G III APPAREL GROUP LTD /DE/ - Annual Report: 2010 (Form 10-K)

 

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

Form 10-K

 

 

Commission file number 0-18183

G-III APPAREL GROUP, LTD.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

 

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code:

(212) 403-0500

 

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

 

 

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

None.

 

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.  Yes o     No þ

 

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Act.  Yes o     No þ

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  Yes þ     No o

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).  Yes o     No o

 

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§ 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.  þ

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

 

(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).  Yes o     No þ

 

As of July 31, 2009, the aggregate market value of the registrant’s voting stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant (based on the last sale price for such shares as quoted by the Nasdaq Global Select Market) was approximately $158,045,800.

 

The number of outstanding shares of the registrant’s Common Stock as of April 1, 2010 was 18,895,879.

 

Documents incorporated by reference: Certain portions of the registrant’s definitive Proxy Statement relating to the registrant’s Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on or about June 8, 2010, to be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 with the Securities and Exchange Commission, are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Report.

 

 

SPECIAL NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

 

Various statements contained in this Form 10-K or incorporated by reference into this Form 10-K, in future filings by us with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), in our press releases and in oral statements made from time to time by us or on our behalf constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements are based on current expectations and are indicated by words or phrases such as “anticipate,” “estimate,” “expect,” “project,” “we believe,” “is or remains optimistic,” “currently envisions,” “forecasts” and similar words or phrases and involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from the future results, performance or achievements expressed in or implied by such forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements also include representations of our expectations or beliefs concerning future events that involve risks and uncertainties, including:

 

 

These forward-looking statements are based largely on our expectations and judgments and are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties, many of which are unforeseeable and beyond our control. A detailed discussion of significant risk factors that have the potential to cause our actual results to differ materially from our expectations is described in Part I of this Form 10-K under the heading of “Risk Factors.” We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required by law.

 

Website Access to Reports

 

Our internet website is http://www.g-iii.com. We make available free of charge on our website (under the heading “About G-III”) our Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file such material with, or furnish it to, the Securities and Exchange Commission.

 

 

Unless the context otherwise requires, “G-III”, “us”, “we” and “our” refer to G-III Apparel Group, Ltd. and its subsidiaries. References to fiscal years refer to the year ended or ending on January 31 of that year. For example, our fiscal year ended January 31, 2010 is referred to as “fiscal 2010”.

 

All share and per share information in this Annual Report has been adjusted to give retroactive effect to a three-for-two stock split of our Common Stock in March 2006.

 

Overview

 

G-III designs, manufactures and markets an extensive range of outerwear, sportswear and dresses, including coats, jackets, pants and women’s suits. We sell our products under licensed brands, our own proprietary brands and private retail labels. We provide high quality apparel under recognized brands to a cross section of leading retailers such as Macy’s, Bloomingdale’s, Nordstrom, Lord & Taylor, JC Penney and Kohl’s. We also operate 121 retail stores, of which 118 are outlet stores operated under the Wilsons Leather name. We distribute our products through a diverse mix and a large number of retailers at a variety of price points, as well as through our own retail stores.

 

We have expanded our portfolio of proprietary and licensed brands for more than 15 years through acquisitions and by entering into license agreements for new brands or for additional product categories under previously licensed brands.

 

Selling products under well-known licensed brands is an important part of our strategy. We have licenses to produce branded fashion apparel, including under the Calvin Klein, Sean John, Kenneth Cole, Cole Haan, Guess?, Jones New York, Jessica Simpson, Nine West, Ellen Tracy, Tommy Hilfiger, Enyce, Levi’s and Dockers brands. We also have sports licenses with the National Football League, National Basketball Association, Major League Baseball, National Hockey League, Touch by Alyssa Milano and over 100 U.S. colleges and universities.

 

G-III sells outerwear and dresses under our own Andrew Marc and Marc New York brands and has licensed these brands for women’s footwear, men’s accessories, women’s handbags and men’s cold weather accessories. Our other owned brands include, among others, Jessica Howard, Eliza J, Black Rivet, G-III and G-III Sports by Carl Banks. We also work with a diversified group of retailers, such as Macy’s, JC Penney and Kohl’s, in developing private label product lines.

 

We have made five acquisitions since July 2005 that have helped to broaden our product offerings, expand our ability to serve different tiers of distribution and add a retail component to our business. Our acquisitions are part of our strategy to expand our product offerings and increase the portfolio of proprietary and licensed brands that we offer through different tiers of retail distribution. We believe that our two most recent additions, Andrew Marc and the Wilsons retail outlet business, both of which were completed in fiscal 2009, leverage our core strength in outerwear and provide us with new avenues for growth. We also believe that these acquisitions complement our other licensed brands, G-III owned brands and private label programs.

 

We operate our business in three segments, wholesale licensed apparel, wholesale non-licensed apparel and retail operations. The wholesale licensed apparel segment includes sales of apparel brands licensed by us from third parties. The wholesale non-licensed apparel segment principally includes sales of apparel under our own brands and private label brands. The retail segment consists almost entirely of the Wilsons retail outlet stores we acquired in July 2008, now operating as AM Retail Group, Inc. See Note N to our Consolidated Financial Statements for financial information with respect to these segments.

 

We are a Delaware corporation that was formed in 1989. We and our predecessors have conducted our business since 1974.

Competitive Strengths

 

We believe that our broad portfolio of high-profile brands combined with our extensive distribution relationships position us for growth. We intend to capitalize on the following competitive strengths in order to achieve our goal of creating an all-season diversified apparel company:

 

Broad portfolio of recognized brands.  We have built a broad and deep portfolio of over 30 licensed and proprietary brands. We believe we are a licensee of choice for well-known brands that have built a loyal following of both fashion-conscious consumers and retailers who desire high quality, well designed apparel. We have selectively added the licensing rights to premier brands in women’s, men’s and sports categories catering to a wide range of customers. In an environment of rapidly changing consumer fashion trends, we benefit from a balanced mix of well-established and newer brands. In addition to our licensed brands, we own several successful proprietary brands, including Andrew Marc and Marc New York. Our experience in developing and acquiring licensed brands and proprietary labels, as well as our reputation for producing high quality, well-designed apparel, has led major department stores and retailers, including Macy’s, JC Penney and Kohl’s, to select us as a designer and manufacturer for their private label programs. We currently market apparel under the following licensed and proprietary brand names:

 

 

Diversified distribution base.  We market our products at multiple price points and across multiple channels of distribution, allowing us to provide products to a broad range of consumers, while reducing our reliance on any one demographic segment, merchandise preference or distribution channel. Our products are sold to approximately 2,800 customers, including a cross section of leading retailers such as Macy’s, Bloomingdale’s, Nordstrom, Lord & Taylor, JC Penney and Kohl’s, and membership clubs such as Costco and Sam’s Club. As a result of our broad distribution platform, we are a licensee and supplier of choice and can more easily adapt to changes in the retail

environment. We believe our strong relationships with retailers have been established through many years of personal customer service and adherence to meeting or exceeding retailer expectations. Our Wilsons retail outlet stores provide an additional distribution network for our outerwear products.

 

Superior design, sourcing and quality control.  Our in-house design and merchandising team designs substantially all of our licensed, proprietary and private label products. Our designers work closely with our licensors and private label customers to create designs and styles that represent the look they want. We believe that our creative design team and our sourcing expertise give us an advantage in product development. We have a network of worldwide suppliers that allows us to negotiate competitive terms without relying on any single vendor. In addition, we employ a quality control team and a sourcing group in China to ensure the quality of our products. We believe we have developed a significant customer following and positive reputation in the industry as a result of our design capabilities, sourcing expertise, on-time delivery and high standards of quality control.

 

Leadership position in the outerwear wholesale business.  As one of the largest outerwear wholesalers, we are widely recognized within the apparel industry for our high-quality and well-designed products. We believe that our acquisition of Andrew Marc reinforces our leadership position in the outerwear business. Our knowledge of the outerwear business and our industry-wide reputation provide us with an advantage when we are competing for outerwear licenses and private label business. Our expertise and reputation in designing, manufacturing and marketing outerwear have enabled us to build strong customer relationships and to expand into women’s dresses, sportswear, suits, performance wear and other product categories.

 

Experienced management team.  Our executive management team has extensive experience in the apparel industry. Morris Goldfarb, our Chief Executive Officer, has been with us for 35 years. Sammy Aaron, our Vice Chairman who joined us in 2005 when we acquired Marvin Richards, has more than 25 years of experience in the apparel industry, Jeanette Nostra, our President, has been with us for over 25 years, and Wayne S. Miller, our Chief Operating Officer, has been with us for over ten years.

 

Growth Strategy

 

Our goal is to build an all-season diversified apparel company with a broad portfolio of brands that we offer in multiple channels of retail distribution through the following growth strategies:

 

Execute diversification initiatives.  We are continually seeking opportunities to produce products for all seasons as we attempt to reduce our dependency on our third fiscal quarter for a significant portion of our net sales and our net income. We have initiated the following diversification efforts:

 

 

Continue to grow our outerwear business.  We have been a leader in the outerwear business for many years and believe there is significant growth potential for us in this category. Specifically, our Calvin Klein men’s and women’s outerwear businesses benefit from Calvin Klein’s strong brand awareness and loyalty among consumers. In February 2008, our acquisition of Andrew Marc added two well known proprietary brands in the men’s and women’s outerwear market, as well as licenses for men’s and women’s outerwear under the Levi’s and Dockers brands.

Extend our new product categories to additional brands.  We have been able to leverage our expertise and experience in the outerwear business to expand our licenses to new product categories such as women’s dresses, sportswear and suits. Most recently, we added licenses for Calvin Klein women’s performance wear and women’s better sportswear. We will attempt to expand our distribution of products in these and other categories under licensed brands, our own brands and private label brands.

 

Seek attractive acquisitions.  We plan to continue to pursue acquisitions of complementary product lines and businesses. In July 2005, we acquired two businesses, both of which added name-brand licenses, including Calvin Klein, Guess?, Ellen Tracy and Tommy Hilfiger, to our expanding brand portfolio. In addition, each of these companies had recognized proprietary labels and significant private label programs. In May 2007, we acquired the Jessica Howard and Eliza J dress business. In February 2008, we acquired Andrew Marc, which added to our portfolio two well-known proprietary brands, Andrew Marc and Marc New York, as well as licenses for the Levi’s and Dockers brands. In July 2008, we acquired 116 Wilsons Leather retail outlet stores. Our acquisitions have increased our portfolio of licensed and proprietary brands, allowed us to realize economies of scale and added a retail component to our business. We believe that our existing infrastructure and management depth will enable us to complete additional acquisitions in the apparel industry.

 

Products — Development and Design

 

G-III designs, manufactures and markets women’s and men’s apparel at a wide range of retail sales prices. Our product offerings primarily include outerwear, women’s dresses and suits, and sportswear, including coats, jackets, pants and skirts. We also market accessories including women’s handbags and men’s carrying cases. We sell products under licensed brands, our own brands and private retail labels.

 

G-III’s licensed apparel consists of both men’s and women’s products. Our strategy is to seek licenses that will enable us to offer a range of products targeting different price points and different distribution channels.

 

G-III’s proprietary branded apparel also consists of both men’s and women’s products. The Andrew Marc line of women’s and men’s luxury outerwear is sold to upscale department and specialty retail stores. The Marc New York line of women’s and men’s better priced outerwear is sold to upper tier stores. The Jessica Howard label is a moderate price dress line that sells to department stores, specialty stores and catalogs. Eliza J is a better dress line that sells to better department and specialty stores. The Black Rivet line of apparel consists of moderately priced women’s and men’s outerwear. We sell men’s sports-related apparel under our G-III Sports by Carl Banks label.

 

We also work with a diversified group of retail chains, such as Macy’s, JC Penney and Kohl’s, in developing product lines that are sold under their private label programs. We meet frequently with department and specialty chain store buyers who custom order products by color, fabric and style. These buyers may provide samples to us or may select styles already available in our showrooms. We believe we have established a reputation among these buyers for our ability to produce high quality product on a reliable, expeditious and cost-effective basis.

 

Our in-house designers are responsible for the design and look of our licensed and non-licensed products. We work closely with our licensors to create designs and styles for each of our licensed brands. Licensors generally must approve products to be sold under their brand names prior to production. We respond to style changes in the apparel industry by maintaining a continuous program of style, color, leather and fabric selection. In designing new products and styles, we attempt to incorporate current trends and consumer preferences. We seek to design products in response to trends in consumer preferences, rather than attempt to create new market trends and styles.

 

Our design personnel meet regularly with our sales and merchandising department, as well as with the design and merchandising staffs of our licensors, to review market trends, sales results and the popularity of our latest products. In addition, our representatives regularly attend trade and fashion shows and shop at fashion forward stores in the United States, Europe and the Far East. Our designers present sample items along with their evaluation of the styles expected to be in demand in the United States. We also seek input from selected customers with respect to product design. We believe that our sensitivity to the needs of retailers, coupled with the flexibility of our production capabilities and our continual monitoring of the retail market, enables us to modify designs and order specifications in a timely fashion.

Licensing

 

The sale of licensed products is a key element of our strategy and we have continually expanded our offerings of licensed products for more than fifteen years. During the past year, we entered into a new license agreement for Sean John boys’ outerwear and Enyce men’s and women’s outerwear. We also expanded our relationship with Tommy Hilfiger to include all men’s outerwear.

 

The following table sets forth, for each of our principal licenses, the date on which the current term ends and the date on which any potential renewal term ends:

 

 

Under our license agreements, we are generally required to achieve minimum net sales of licensed products, pay guaranteed minimum royalties, make specified royalty and advertising payments (usually based on a percentage of net sales of licensed products), and receive prior approval of the licensor as to all design and other elements of a garment prior to production. If we do not satisfy any of these requirements or otherwise fail to meet our obligations under a license agreement, a licensor usually will have the right to terminate our license.

 

Our ability to renew the current term of a license agreement is usually subject to attaining minimum sales and/or royalty levels and to our compliance with the terms of the agreement. Other criteria may also impact our ability to renew a license. As a result, we cannot be sure that we will be able to renew a license agreement when it expires if we desire to do so. We believe that brand owners are looking to consolidate the number of licensees they

engage to develop product and to choose licensees who have a successful track record of developing brands. We continue to seek other opportunities to enter into license agreements in order to expand our product offerings under well-known labels and broaden the markets that we serve.

 

Revenues from the sale of licensed products accounted for 65.4% of our net sales (73.5% of our net sales of wholesale apparel) in fiscal 2010 compared to 60.5% of our net sales (68.0% of net sales of wholesale apparel) in fiscal 2009 and 70.3% of our net sales in fiscal 2008. For comparability purposes, we have included the percentage that sales of licensed apparel accounted for of our wholesale sales in fiscal 2009 and fiscal 2010, consisting of sales in our licensed and non-licensed apparel segments, as we added a retail segment in fiscal 2009 as a result of our acquisition of the Wilsons retail outlet business.

 

Retail Operations

 

In July 2008, we acquired certain assets of Wilsons The Leather Experts, which had been a national retailer of outerwear and accessories. The assets acquired included 116 retail outlet store leases, inventory, distribution center operations and the Wilsons name and other related trademarks and trade names. As of January 31, 2010, we operated 121 retail stores in 35 states, 118 of which are outlet stores operated under the name Wilsons Leather Outlets. Substantially all of our outlet stores are located in larger outlet centers and average approximately 3,900 total leased square feet.

 

Our outlet stores sell men’s and women’s outerwear and accessories. Outerwear sold in our stores includes products primarily manufactured by us and accessories which are purchased from third parties. Our Wilsons Leather Outlet stores offer clearance items and special outlet-only merchandise, as well as certain key in-season products for both men and women.

 

Merchandise for our stores is shipped directly from domestic merchandise vendors or overseas manufacturers to our retail outlet distribution center located in Brooklyn Park, Minnesota. Merchandise is shipped from our Brooklyn Park, Minnesota distribution center to replenish stores as needed with key styles and to build inventory for the peak holiday selling season.

 

Manufacturing and Sourcing

 

G-III arranges for the production of products from independent manufacturers located primarily in China and, to a lesser extent, in Vietnam, India, Indonesia, Thailand, Sri Lanka, Taiwan and Central and South America. A small portion of our garments are manufactured in the United States.

 

We currently have representative offices in Qingdao, Hangzhou and Nanjing, China. These offices act as a liaison between us and manufacturers in China. At January 31, 2010, we had 105 employees in our China offices.

 

G-III’s headquarters provides these liaison offices with production orders stating the quantity, quality, delivery time and types of garments to be produced. Liaison office personnel assist in the negotiation and placement of orders with manufacturers. In allocating production among independent suppliers, we consider a number of criteria, including, but not limited to, quality, availability of production capacity, pricing and ability to meet changing production requirements.

 

To facilitate better service for our customers and accommodate the volume of manufacturing in the Far East, we also have an office in Hong Kong. The Hong Kong office supports third party production of products on a commission-fee basis that we arrange as agent directly for some of our customers. We utilize our China and Hong Kong office employees to monitor production at each manufacturer’s facility to ensure quality control, compliance with our specifications and timely delivery of finished garments to our distribution facilities and customers. At January 31, 2010, the Hong Kong office employed seven persons.

 

In connection with the foreign manufacture of our apparel, manufacturers purchase leather, wool and other fabrics under our direction. In addition, they purchase necessary “submaterials” (such as linings, zippers, buttons and trimmings) according to parameters specified by us. Prior to commencing the manufacture of garments, samples of raw materials or submaterials are sent to us for approval. We regularly inspect and supervise the

manufacture of our products in order to ensure timely delivery, maintain quality control and monitor compliance with our manufacturing specifications. We also inspect finished apparel at the factory site.

 

The manufacture of the substantial majority of our apparel is performed manually. A pattern is used in cutting fabric to panels that are assembled in the factory. All submaterials are also added at this time. We inspect products throughout this process to insure that the design and quality specifications of the order are being maintained as the garment is assembled. After pressing, cleaning and final inspection, the garment is labeled and ready for shipment. A final random inspection by us occurs when the garments are packed for shipment.

 

We generally arrange for the production of apparel on a purchase order basis with completed garments manufactured to our design specifications. We assume the risk of loss predominantly on a Freight-On-Board (F.O.B.) basis when goods are delivered to a shipper and are insured against casualty losses arising during shipping.

 

As is customary in the apparel industry, we have not entered into any long-term contractual arrangements with any contractor or manufacturer. We believe that the production capacity of foreign manufacturers with which we have developed, or are developing, a relationship is adequate to meet our apparel production requirements for the foreseeable future. We believe that alternative foreign apparel manufacturers are readily available.

 

A majority of all finished goods manufactured for us is shipped to our New Jersey warehouse and distribution facilities or to designated third party facilities for final inspection and allocation, as well as reshipment to customers. The goods are delivered to our customers and us by independent shippers. We choose the form of shipment (principally ship, truck or air) based upon a customer’s needs, cost and timing considerations.

 

Quotas, Customs and Import Restrictions

 

Our arrangements with textile manufacturers and suppliers are subject to requisite customs clearances for textile apparel and the imposition of export duties. United States Customs duties on our textile apparel presently range from duty free to 28%, depending upon the type of fabric used and how the garment is constructed. Quotas represent the right to export restricted amounts of certain categories of merchandise into a country or territory pursuant to a visa or a license. Countries in which our products are manufactured and sold may, from time to time, impose new duties, tariffs, surcharges or other import controls or restrictions or adjust prevailing duty or tariff levels. The products we are currently importing are not subject to quota restrictions. We continually monitor duty, tariff and other import restriction developments. We seek to minimize our potential exposure to import related risks through, among other measures, geographical diversification of manufacturing sources and shifts of production among countries and manufacturers.

 

Raw Materials

 

We purchase most products manufactured for us on a finished goods basis. We coordinate the sourcing of raw materials used in the production of our apparel, such as leather, wool and cotton, which are available from numerous sources. The leather apparel industry competes with manufacturers of other leather products for the supply of leather. Leather skins are a byproduct. Accordingly, raw material costs for leather products are generally impacted by changes in meat consumption worldwide, as well as by the popularity of leather products.

 

Marketing and Distribution

 

G-III’s products are sold primarily to department, specialty and mass merchant retail stores in the United States. We sell to approximately 2,800 customers, ranging from national and regional chains to small specialty stores. We also distribute our products through our retail outlet stores.

 

Sales to our 10 largest customers accounted for 55.0% of our net sales in fiscal 2010 compared to 53.8% of our net sales in fiscal 2009 and 59.7% of our net sales in fiscal 2008. Sales to Macy’s, which includes sales to its Macy’s and Bloomingdale’s store chains, accounted for an aggregate of 16.8% of our net sales in fiscal 2010, 15.4% of our net sales in fiscal 2009 and 18.9% of our net sales in fiscal 2008. The loss of Macy’s as a customer, or a significant reduction in purchases by Macy’s, could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations.

Almost all of our sales are made in the United States. We also market our products in Canada, Europe and the Far East, which, on a combined basis, accounted for approximately 3% of our wholesale net sales in fiscal 2010.

 

G-III’s products are sold primarily through a direct sales force consisting of 73 employees at January 31, 2010. Our principal executives are also actively involved in sales of our products. Some of our products are also sold by various retail buying offices and independent sales representatives located throughout the United States. Final authorization of all sales of product is solely through our New York showrooms, enabling our management to deal directly with, and be readily accessible to, major customers, as well as to more effectively control our selling operations.

 

Brand name products sold by us pursuant to a license agreement are promoted by institutional and product advertisements placed by the licensor. Our license agreements generally require us to pay the licensor a fee, based on a percentage of net sales of licensed product, to pay for a portion of these advertising costs. We may also be required to spend a specified percentage of net sales of a licensed product on advertising placed by us.

 

We primarily rely on our reputation and relationships to generate business in our non-licensed segment. We believe we have developed a significant customer following and positive reputation in the industry as a result of, among other things, standards of quality control, on-time delivery, competitive pricing and the willingness and ability to assist customers in their merchandising of our products. In addition, we have, to a limited extent, advertised our own labels and engaged in cooperative advertising programs with retailers. We believe we have developed brand awareness of our own labels primarily through our reputation, consumer acceptance and the fashion press. We have allocated additional marketing and advertising resources to support the growth of our Andrew Marc brand.

 

Seasonality

 

Retail sales of outerwear apparel have traditionally been seasonal in nature. Sales of outerwear constitute a significant majority of our sales. In prior years, we have been dependent on our sales from July through November for the substantial majority of our net sales and net income. Although we sell our apparel products throughout the year, net sales in the months of July through November accounted for approximately 64% of our net sales in fiscal 2010, 70% of our net sales in fiscal 2009 and 75% of our net sales in fiscal 2008. Andrew Marc, which was acquired in February 2008, experiences similar seasonality to our other wholesale outerwear businesses. Our Wilsons retail outlet business, which we acquired in July 2008, is also highly seasonal, with the third and fourth fiscal quarters accounting for a significant majority of its sales and operating income. As a result, the second half of our fiscal year is expected to provide a disproportionate amount of our net sales and substantially all of our net income.

 

Order Book

 

A portion of our orders consists of short-term purchase orders from customers who place orders on an as-needed basis. Information relative to open purchase orders at any date may also be materially affected by, among other things, the timing of the initial showing of apparel to the trade, as well as by the timing of recording of orders and shipments. As a result, we do not believe that disclosure of the amount of our unfilled customer orders at any time is meaningful.

 

Competition

 

We have numerous competitors with respect to the sale of apparel, including distributors that import apparel from abroad and domestic retailers with established foreign manufacturing capabilities. Many of our competitors have greater financial and marketing resources and greater manufacturing capacity than we do. We also compete with vertically integrated apparel manufacturers that also own retail stores. The general availability of contract manufacturing capacity also allows ease of access by new market entrants. Our retail outlet business competes against a diverse group of retailers, including, among others, other outlet stores, department stores, specialty stores, warehouse clubs and e-commerce retailers. Sales of our products are affected by style, price, quality, brand reputation and general fashion trends.

Trademarks

 

We own the trademarks used in connection with our non-licensed apparel segment and act as licensee of certain trademarks owned by third parties that are used in connection with our licensed apparel. The principal brands that we license are summarized under the heading “Licensing” above. We also own a number of proprietary brands that we use in connection with our business and products including, among others, Andrew Marc, Marc New York, Jessica Howard, Eliza J., Black Rivet, Marvin Richards, Winlit, G-III and G-III Sports by Carl Banks. We have registered, or applied for registration of, many of our trademarks in multiple jurisdictions, including those referenced above, for use on a variety of apparel and apparel-related products, as well as for retail services.

 

In markets outside of the U.S., our rights to some of our trademarks may not be clearly established. In the course of our attempts to expand into foreign markets, we may experience conflicts with various third parties who have acquired ownership rights in certain trademarks, which would impede our use and registration of some of our trademarks. Such conflicts are common and may arise again from time to time as we pursue international expansion. Although we have not in the past suffered any material restraints or restrictions on doing business in desirable markets or in new product categories, we cannot be sure that significant impediments will not arise in the future as we expand product offerings and introduce additional brands to new markets.

 

We regard our trademarks and other proprietary rights as valuable assets and believe that they have value in the marketing of our products. We vigorously protect our trademarks and other intellectual property rights against infringement.

 

Employees

 

As of January 31, 2010, we had 1,880 employees, of whom 149 worked in executive or administrative capacities, 385 worked in design, merchandising and sourcing, 358 worked in warehouse and distribution facilities, 73 worked in wholesale sales, and 915 worked in our retail outlet stores. Additionally, during our peak retail selling season from October through January, we employed approximately 36 additional seasonal employees in our Brooklyn Park, Minnesota distribution center and approximately 725 additional seasonal associates in our Wilsons retail outlet stores. We employ both union and non-union personnel and believe that our relations with our employees are good. We have not experienced any interruption of any of our operations due to a labor disagreement with our employees and do not believe any interruption will occur if the labor agreements referred to below are not renewed.

 

We are a party to agreements with two labor unions. One agreement covers approximately 187 of our full-time employees as of January 31, 2010 and is currently in effect through October 31, 2011. The other agreement covers approximately 13 full-time employees of our Andrew Marc division and is currently in effect through December 31, 2011.

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT

 

The following table sets forth certain information with respect to our executive officers.

 

 

Morris Goldfarb is our Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, as well as one of our directors. Until April 1997, Mr. Goldfarb also served as our President. Mr. Goldfarb has served as an executive officer of G-III and our predecessors since our formation in 1974. Mr. Goldfarb is also a director of Lakes Entertainment, Inc.

 

Sammy Aaron has been our Vice Chairman, as well as one of our directors, since we acquired the Marvin Richards business in July 2005. Mr. Aaron also oversees the operations of our Calvin Klein division. Prior to joining G-III, Mr. Aaron served as the President of Marvin Richards from 1998 until July 2005.

 

Jeanette Nostra became our President in April 1997. In March 2008, Ms. Nostra added the role of President of our Andrew Marc division. Ms. Nostra’s responsibilities include sales, marketing, merchandising, product development and public relations for selected licensed fashion brands. We have employed Ms. Nostra since 1981.

 

Wayne S. Miller has been our Chief Operating Officer since December 2003 and our Secretary since November 1998. He also served as our Chief Financial Officer from April 1998 until September 2005 and as our Treasurer from November 1998 until April 2006.

 

Neal S. Nackman has been our Chief Financial Officer since September 2005 and was elected Treasurer in April 2006. Mr. Nackman served as Vice President — Finance from December 2003 until April 2006. Prior to joining G-III, Mr. Nackman was a financial consultant with Jefferson Wells International from January 2003 until December 2003. From May 2001 until October 2002, he was Senior Vice President — Controller of Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia, Inc. From May 1999 until May 2001, he was Chief Financial Officer of Perry Ellis International Inc. From August 1995 until May 1999, he was the Vice-President — Finance with Nautica Enterprises, Inc.

 

Deborah Gaertner became Group President-G-III Women’s in March 2008. She had been Vice President — Women’s Division since March 1992. Ms. Gaertner is responsible for sales, merchandising, product development and marketing of certain of our women’s apparel lines. She previously served as Vice President, Imports from June 1989 until March 1992, coordinating production and merchandising.

 

Carl Katz, one of our directors, and Jeanette Nostra are married to each other.

 

 

The following risk factors should be read carefully in connection with evaluating our business and the forward-looking statements contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Any of the following risks could materially adversely affect our business, our prospects, our operating results, our financial condition, the trading prices of our securities and the actual outcome of matters as to which forward-looking statements are made in this report. Additional risks that we do not yet know of or that we currently think are immaterial may also affect our business operations.

 

Risk Factors Relating to Our Licensed and Non-Licensed Wholesale Apparel Business

 

The failure to maintain our license agreements could cause us to lose significant revenues and have a material adverse effect on our results of operations.

 

We are dependent on sales of licensed product for a substantial portion of our revenues. In fiscal 2010, revenues from the sale of licensed product accounted for 65.4% of our net sales (73.5% of our net sales of wholesale apparel) compared to 60.5% of our net sales (68.0% of net sales of wholesale apparel) in fiscal 2009 and 70.3% of our net sales in fiscal 2008.

 

We are generally required to achieve specified minimum net sales, make specified royalty and advertising payments and receive prior approval of the licensor as to all design and other elements of a garment prior to production. License agreements also may restrict our ability to enter into other license agreements for competing products. If we do not satisfy any of these requirements, a licensor usually will have the right to terminate our license. Even if a licensor does not terminate our license, the failure to achieve net sales sufficient to cover our required minimum royalty payments could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations. If a license contains a renewal provision, there are usually minimum sales and other conditions that must be met in order to be able to renew a license. Even if we comply with all the terms of a license agreement, we cannot be sure that we will be able to renew an agreement when it expires even if we desire to do so. The failure to maintain our license agreements could cause us to lose significant revenue and have a material adverse effect on our results of operations.

 

Our success is dependent on the strategies and reputation of our licensors.

 

Our business strategy is to offer our products on a multiple brand, multiple channel and multiple price point basis. As a part of this strategy, we license the names and brands of numerous recognized companies, designers and celebrities. In entering into these license agreements, we plan our products to be targeted towards different market segments based on consumer demographics, design, suggested pricing and channel of distribution. If any of our licensors decides to “reposition” its products under the brands we license from them, introduce similar products under similar brand names or otherwise change the parameters of design, pricing, distribution, target market or competitive set, we could experience a significant downturn in that brand’s business, adversely affecting our sales and profitability. We have six different license agreements relating to a variety of products sold under the Calvin Klein brand that is owned by Phillips-Van Heusen Corporation. Any change by Phillips-Van Heusen in the marketing of products sold under the Calvin Klein label, or any adverse change in our relationship with Phillips Van-Heusen, could have a material adverse affect on our results of operations. In addition, as licensed products may be personally associated with designers or celebrities, our sales of those products could be materially and adversely affected if any of those individuals’ images, reputations or popularity were to be negatively impacted.

 

If we are unable to successfully translate market trends into attractive product offerings, our sales and profitability could suffer.

 

Our ability to successfully compete depends on a number of factors, including our ability to effectively anticipate, gauge and respond to changing consumer demands and tastes across multiple product lines and tiers of distribution. We are required to translate market trends into attractive product offerings and operate within substantial production and delivery constraints. We cannot be sure we will continue to be successful in this regard. We need to anticipate and respond to changing trends quickly, efficiently and effectively in order to be successful.

Expansion of our product offerings involves significant costs and uncertainty and could adversely affect our results of operations.

 

An important part of our strategy is to expand the types of products we offer. During the past few years, we have added licenses for new lines of women’s suits, dresses, performance wear and sportswear. In addition, we acquired a dress and sportswear manufacturer. We had limited prior experience designing, manufacturing and marketing these types of products. We intend to continue to add additional product lines in the future. As is typical with new products, demand and market acceptance for any new products we introduce will be subject to uncertainty. Designing, producing and marketing new products require substantial expenditures. We cannot be certain that our efforts and expenditures will successfully generate sufficient sales or that sales that are generated will be sufficient to cover our expenditures. For example, in March 2006, we entered into a license for women’s sportswear under the Sean John label. This license was mutually terminated in January 2008, resulting in a charge to earnings in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2008.

 

If our customers change their buying patterns, request additional allowances, develop their own private label brands or enter into agreements with national brand manufacturers to sell their products on an exclusive basis, our sales to these customers could be materially adversely affected.

 

Our customers’ buying patterns, as well as the need to provide additional allowances to vendors, could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition. Customers’ strategic initiatives, including developing their own private labels brands, selling national brands on an exclusive basis or reducing the number of vendors they purchase from, could also impact our sales to these customers.

 

We have significant customer concentration, and the loss of one of our large customers could adversely affect our business.

 

Our 10 largest customers accounted for approximately 55.0% of our net sales in fiscal 2010, 53.8% of our net sales in fiscal 2009 and 59.7% of our net sales in fiscal 2008, with our largest customer accounting for 16.8% of our net sales in fiscal 2010. Consolidation in the retail industry could increase the concentration of our sales to our largest customers. We do not have long-term contracts with any customers, and sales to customers generally occur on an order-by-order basis that may be subject to cancellation or rescheduling by the customer. A decision by our major customers to decrease the amount of merchandise purchased from us, to increase the use of their own private label brands, to sell a national brand on an exclusive basis or to change the manner of doing business with us could reduce our revenues and materially adversely affect our results of operations. The loss of any of our large customers, or the bankruptcy or serious financial difficulty of any of our large customers, could have a material adverse effect on us.

 

If we miscalculate the market for our products, we may end up with significant excess inventories for some products and missed opportunities for others.

 

We often produce garments to hold in inventory in order to meet our customers’ delivery requirements and to be able to quickly fulfill reorders. If we misjudge the market for our products, we may be faced with significant excess inventories for some products and missed opportunities for others. In addition, weak sales and resulting markdown requests from customers could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations.

 

We are subject to the risks of doing business abroad.

 

Our arrangements with foreign manufacturers are subject to the usual risks of doing business abroad, including currency fluctuations, political or labor instability and potential import restrictions, duties and tariffs. We do not maintain insurance for the potential lost profits due to disruptions of our overseas manufacturers. Because our products are produced abroad, primarily in China, political or economic instability in China or elsewhere could cause substantial disruption in the business of our foreign manufacturers. For example, in the past, the Chinese government has reduced tax rebates to factories for the manufacture of textile and leather garments. The rebate reduction resulted in factories seeking to recoup more of their costs from customers, resulting in higher prices for goods imported from China. This tax rebate has been reinstated in certain instances. However, new or increased

reductions in this rebate would cause an increase in the cost of finished garments from China which could materially adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.

 

Heightened terrorism security concerns could subject imported goods to additional, more frequent or more thorough inspections. This could delay deliveries or increase costs, which could adversely impact our results of operations. In addition, since we negotiate our purchase orders with foreign manufacturers in United States dollars, the decline in value of the United States dollar against local currencies would negatively impact our cost in dollars of product sourced from these manufacturers. We are not currently engaged in any hedging activities to protect against currency risks. If there is downward pressure on the value of the dollar, our purchase prices for our products could increase. We may not be able to offset an increase in product costs with a price increase to our customers.

 

Fluctuations in the price, availability and quality of materials used in our products could have a material adverse effect on our cost of goods sold and our ability to meet our customers’ demands.

 

Fluctuations in the price, availability and quality of the leather, wool and other materials used in our products could have a material adverse effect on our cost of sales or our ability to meet our customers’ demands. We compete with numerous entities for supplies of materials and manufacturing capacity. The supply and price of leather are vulnerable to animal diseases as well as natural disasters that can affect the supply and price of raw leather. For example, in the past, the outbreak of mad-cow and foot-and-mouth disease in Europe, and its aftereffects, adversely affected the supply and cost of leather. Any recurrence of these diseases could adversely affect us. The prices for wool and other fabrics used in our products depend largely on the market prices for the raw materials used to produce them, such as raw wool or cotton. We may not be able to pass on all or any portion of higher material prices to our customers.

 

Our trademark and other intellectual property rights may not be adequately protected.

 

We believe that our trademarks and other proprietary rights are important to our success and our competitive position. We may, however, experience conflict with various third parties who acquire or claim ownership rights in certain trademarks. We cannot be sure that the actions we have taken to establish and protect these trademarks and other proprietary rights will be adequate to prevent imitation of our products by others or to prevent others from seeking to block sales of our products as a violation of the trademarks and proprietary rights of others. In addition, enforcing rights to our intellectual property may be difficult and expensive, and we may not be successful in combating counterfeit products and stopping infringement of our intellectual property rights, which could make it easier for competitors to capture market share. Furthermore, our efforts to enforce our trademark and other intellectual property rights may be met with defenses, counterclaims and countersuits attacking the validity and enforceability of our trademark and other intellectual property rights. If we are unsuccessful in protecting and enforcing our intellectual property rights, continued sales of such competing products by third parties could harm our brands and adversely impact our business, financial condition and results of operations.

 

Risks Relating to Our Retail Outlet Business

 

Expansion of our business into the retail sector involves significant costs and uncertainties.

 

In July 2008, we acquired 116 outlet store leases, as well as inventory, fixtures, a warehouse location and trademarks and trade names, from Wilsons The Leather Experts. As of January 31, 2010, we operated 121 retail stores. Managing the Wilsons outlet stores requires the expenditure of our time and resources. Operation of a retail chain could divert our management’s time and resources from our core wholesale apparel business. Operation of a retail chain could be viewed as competitive by our licensors and existing retail customers and adversely affect our relationships with them. Accordingly, the ownership of the Wilsons retail outlet business could negatively impact our results of operations.

 

We will need to improve the results of operations of the acquired Wilsons retail outlet stores in order for these stores to operate profitably for us. We had no experience operating a retail chain prior to this acquisition.

 

Prior to our acquisition of the Wilsons retail outlet stores, these stores as a whole were experiencing declines in comparable store sales, sales per square foot and gross margins. The operation of these stores negatively impacted our

results of operations in fiscal 2009 and 2010. We will need to further improve store operations and upgrade merchandise offered at these stores in order for these stores to operate profitably for us. We had no experience operating a retail chain prior to this acquisition and cannot be sure we will be able to improve the operations of these stores. If we cannot improve the results of operations of these stores sufficiently for them to be profitable, this acquisition could have a material adverse effect on our result of operations.

 

Leasing of significant amounts of real estate exposes us to possible liabilities and losses.

 

All of the Wilsons retail outlet stores operated by us are leased. Accordingly, we are subject to all of the risks associated with leasing real estate. Store leases generally require us to pay a fixed minimum rent and a variable amount based on a percentage of annual sales at that location. We generally cannot cancel our leases. If an existing or future store is not profitable, and we decide to close it, we may be committed to perform certain obligations under the applicable lease including, among other things, paying rent for the balance of the applicable lease term. As each of our leases expires, if we do not have a renewal option, we may be unable to negotiate a renewal, on commercially acceptable terms or at all, which could cause us to close stores in desirable locations. In addition, we may not be able to close an unprofitable store due to an existing operating covenant, which may cause us to operate the location at a loss and prevent us from finding a more desirable location.

 

Our retail outlet stores are heavily dependent on the ability and desire of consumers to travel and shop. A reduction in the volume of outlet mall traffic could adversely affect our retail sales.

 

Our retail outlet stores are located in outlet malls, which are typically located in or near vacation destinations or away from large population centers where department stores and other traditional retailers are concentrated. Factors, such as the current economic problems in the U.S., fuel shortages, increased fuel prices, travel concerns and other circumstances, which would lead to decreased travel, could have a material adverse affect on sales at our outlet stores. Other factors which could affect the success of our outlet stores include:

 

 

Sales at our stores are derived, in part, from the volume of traffic at the malls where our stores are located. Our stores benefit from the ability of a mall’s other tenants and other area attractions to generate consumer traffic in the vicinity of our stores and the continuing popularity of outlet malls as shopping destinations. A reduction in outlet mall traffic as a result of these or other factors could materially adversely affect our business.

 

The retail business is intensely competitive and increased or new competition could have a material adverse effect on us.

 

The retail industry is intensely competitive. We compete against a diverse group of retailers, including, among others, other outlet stores, department stores, specialty stores, warehouse clubs and e-commerce retailers. We also compete in particular markets with a number of retailers that specialize in the products that we sell. A number of different competitive factors could have a material adverse effect on our retail business, results of operations and financial condition including:

 

 

We may not be able to continue to compete successfully with our existing or new competitors, or be assured that prolonged periods of deep discount pricing by our competitors will not have a material adverse effect on our business.

 

A privacy breach could adversely affect our business.

 

The protection of customer, employee, and company data is critical to us. The regulatory environment surrounding information security and privacy is increasingly demanding, with the frequent imposition of new and constantly changing requirements across business units. In addition, customers have a high expectation that we will adequately protect their personal information. A significant breach of customer, employee, or company data could damage our reputation and result in lost sales, fines, or lawsuits.

 

Risk Factors Relating to the Operation of Our Business

 

If we lose the services of our key personnel, our business will be harmed.

 

Our future success depends on Morris Goldfarb, our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, and other key personnel. The loss of the services of Mr. Goldfarb and any negative market or industry perception arising from the loss of his services could have a material adverse effect on us and the price of our shares. Our other executive officers have substantial experience and expertise in our business and have made significant contributions to our success. The unexpected loss of services of one or more of these individuals could also adversely affect us.

 

We have expanded our business through acquisitions that could result in diversion of resources, an inability to integrate acquired operations and extra expenses. This could disrupt our business and adversely affect our financial condition.

 

Part of our growth strategy is to pursue acquisitions. In July 2005, we acquired Marvin Richards and the operating assets of Winlit, in May 2007, we acquired the operating assets of Jessica Howard, in February 2008, we acquired Andrew Marc and in July 2008, we acquired certain assets related to the Wilsons retail outlet business. The negotiation of potential acquisitions as well as the integration of acquired businesses could divert our management’s time and resources. Acquired businesses may not be successfully integrated with our operations. We may not realize the intended benefits of any acquisition. For example, the results of Wilsons adversely affected our results of operations in fiscal 2009 and 2010.

 

Acquisitions could also result in:

 

 

If acquisitions disrupt our operations, our business may suffer.

 

We may need additional financing to continue to grow.

 

The continued growth of our business depends on our access to sufficient funds to support our growth. Our primary source of working capital to support our growth is our line of credit which, in April 2008, was extended to July 2011. Our need for working capital and the amount of our debt has increased significantly as a result of our five acquisitions since July 2005. The maximum available under our line of credit has increased from $110 million prior

to our acquisitions in July 2005 to its current level of $250 million. Our growth is dependent on our ability to continue to be able to extend and increase the line of credit. If we are unable to refinance our debt, we cannot be sure we will be able to secure alternative financing on satisfactory terms or at all. The loss of the use of this credit facility or the inability to replace this facility when it expires would materially impair our ability to operate our business. In addition, considering the uncertainties of the present economic environment, it is possible, in general, that one or more committed lenders might not meet its obligations to lend to us and there is no assurance we would be able to replace any such lender.

 

Our business is highly seasonal. Our results of operations may suffer in the event that the weather is unusually warm during the peak outerwear selling season.

 

Retail sales of outerwear have traditionally been seasonal in nature. Sales of outerwear constitute a significant majority of our sales. As a result, in prior years we have been dependent on our sales from July through November for the substantial majority of our net sales and net income. Net sales in the months of July through November accounted for approximately 64% of our net sales in fiscal 2010, 70% of our net sales in fiscal 2009 and 75% of our net sales in fiscal 2008. The Andrew Marc business we acquired in February 2008 experiences seasonality similar to our other wholesale outerwear businesses. Our Wilsons retail outlet business, acquired in July 2008, is also highly seasonal, with the third and fourth fiscal quarters accounting for a significant majority of its sales and operating income. As a result, we will be highly dependent on our results of operations during the second half of our fiscal year. Any difficulties we may encounter during this period as a result of weather or disruption of manufacturing or transportation of our products will have a magnified effect on our net sales and net income for the year. In addition, because of the large amount of outerwear we sell at both wholesale and retail, unusually warm weather conditions during the peak fall and winter outerwear selling season, including as a result of any change in historical climate patterns, could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations. Our quarterly results of operations for our retail business also may fluctuate based upon such factors as the timing of certain holiday seasons, the number and timing of new store openings, the acceptability of seasonal merchandise offerings, the timing and level of markdowns, store closings and remodels, competitive factors, weather and general economic conditions. The second half of the year is expected to continue to provide a disproportionate amount of our net sales and substantially all of our net income for the foreseeable future.

 

We are dependent upon foreign manufacturers.

 

We do not own or operate any manufacturing facilities. We also do not have long-term written agreements with any of our manufacturers. As a result, any of these manufacturers may unilaterally terminate its relationship with us at any time. Almost all of our products are imported from independent foreign manufacturers. The failure of these manufacturers to meet required quality standards could damage our relationships with our customers. In addition, the failure by these manufacturers to ship products to us in a timely manner could cause us to miss the delivery date requirements of our customers. Ocean carriers have significantly reduced capacity as a result of the decrease of imports into the U.S. that accompanied the economic downturn in 2009. This reduction in shipping supply could adversely impact our ability to timely receive products from our foreign manufacturers and could result in an increase in the cost to ship products. The failure to make timely deliveries could cause customers to cancel orders, refuse to accept delivery of products or demand reduced prices.

 

We are also dependent on these manufacturers for compliance with our policies and the policies of our licensors and customers regarding labor practices employed by factories that manufacture product for us. Any failure by these manufacturers to comply with required labor standards or any other divergence in their labor or other practices from those generally considered ethical in the United States, and the potential negative publicity relating to any of these events, could result in a violation by us of our license agreements and harm us and our reputation. In addition, a manufacturer’s failure to comply with safety or content regulations and standards could result in substantial liability and harm to our reputation.

The construction and operation of our new warehouse facility could disrupt our business and adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.

 

In December 2009, we entered into a lease for a new warehouse facility in New Jersey. This new facility will be approximately twice as large as the biggest warehouse facility that we currently operate. We are expending significant amounts to install racking systems, machinery, equipment and other furnishings in this building. The construction of a new facility could divert our management’s time and attention from the operation of the rest of our business. We will be transferring part of our warehouse operations from other facilities to this new facility. If there is a delay in the construction of this new facility or we do not efficiently manage the transfer of operations to this new facility, our operations could be disrupted during the busiest time of our year which could reduce our ability to ship product to our customers on a timely basis and damage our relationships with our customers. We cannot be sure that we will realize the intended benefits of consolidating some of our warehouse operations into a single facility and lessen our dependence on third party warehouses. Any disruption in our warehouse operations and in the timely distribution of our products could have an adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

 

Risk Factors Relating to the Economy and the Apparel Industry

 

Recent and future economic conditions, including turmoil in the financial and credit markets, may adversely affect our business.

 

The current economic and credit environment is having a significant negative impact on businesses around the world. The impact of the current environment on the apparel industry and our major customers has been significant. Conditions may continue to be depressed or may be subject to further deterioration which could lead to a reduction in consumer spending overall, which could have an adverse impact on sales of our products. A disruption in the ability of our significant customers to access liquidity could cause serious disruptions or an overall deterioration of their businesses which could lead to a significant reduction in their orders of our products and the inability or failure on their part to meet their payment obligations to us, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and liquidity. A significant adverse change in a customer’s financial and/or credit position could also require us to assume greater credit risk relating to that customer’s receivables or could limit our ability to collect receivables related to previous purchases by that customer. As a result, our reserves for doubtful accounts and write-offs of accounts receivable may increase.

 

Our ability to continue to have the necessary liquidity to operate our business may be adversely impacted by a number of factors, including a continuation of the difficult conditions in the credit and financial markets which could limit the availability and increase the cost of financing. A deterioration of our results of operations and cash flow resulting from continued decreases in consumer spending, could, among other things, impact our ability to comply with financial covenants in our existing credit facility.

 

Our historical sources of liquidity to fund ongoing cash requirements include cash flows from operations, cash and cash equivalents, as well as borrowings through our loan agreement (which includes revolving and trade letter of credit facilities). The sufficiency and availability of credit may be adversely affected by a variety of factors, including, without limitation, the tightening of the credit markets, including lending by financial institutions who are sources of credit for our borrowing and liquidity; an increase in the cost of capital; the reduced availability of credit; our ability to execute our strategy; the level of our cash flows, which will be impacted by retailer and consumer acceptance of our products and the level of consumer discretionary spending; maintenance of financial covenants included in our loan agreement; and interest rate fluctuations. We cannot be certain that any additional required financing, whether debt or equity, will be available in amounts needed or on terms acceptable to us, if at all.

 

As of January 31, 2010, we were in compliance with the financial covenants in our loan agreement. Compliance with these financial covenants is dependent on the results of our operations, which are subject to a number of factors including current economic conditions. The current economic environment has resulted generally in lower consumer confidence and lower retail sales. A continuation of this trend may lead to further reduced consumer spending which could adversely impact our net sales and cash flow, which could affect our compliance with our financial covenants. A violation of our covenants could limit access to our credit facilities. Should such

restrictions on our credit facilities and these factors occur, they could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.

 

The cyclical nature of the apparel industry and uncertainty over future economic prospects and consumer spending could have a materially adverse effect on our results of operations.

 

The apparel industry is cyclical. Purchases of outerwear, sportswear and other apparel tend to decline during recessionary periods and may decline for a variety of other reasons, including changes in fashion trends and the introduction of new products or pricing changes by our competitors. Uncertainties regarding future economic prospects may affect consumer-spending habits and could have an adverse effect on our results of operations. Uncertainty with respect to consumer spending as a result of weak economic conditions has, at times, caused our customers to delay the placing of initial orders and to slow the pace of reorders during the seasonal peak of our business. Weak economic conditions have had a material adverse effect on our results of operations at times in the past and could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations in the future as well.

 

The competitive nature of the apparel industry may result in lower prices for our products and decreased gross profit margins.

 

The apparel business is highly competitive. We have numerous competitors with respect to the sale of apparel, including distributors that import apparel from abroad and domestic retailers with established foreign manufacturing capabilities. Many of our competitors have greater financial and marketing resources and greater manufacturing capacity than we do. We also compete with vertically integrated apparel manufacturers that also own retail stores. The general availability of contract manufacturing capacity also allows ease of access by new market entrants. The competitive nature of the apparel industry may result in lower prices for our products and decreased gross profit margins, either of which may materially adversely affect our sales and profitability. Sales of our products are affected by style, price, quality, brand reputation and general fashion trends.

 

If major department, mass merchant and specialty store chains continue to consolidate, our business could be negatively affected.

 

We sell our products to major department, mass merchant and specialty store chains. Continued consolidation in the retail industry could negatively impact our business. Consolidation could reduce the number of our customers and potential customers. With increased consolidation in the retail industry, we are increasingly dependent on retailers whose bargaining strength may increase and whose share of our business may grow. As a result, we may face greater pressure from these customers to provide more favorable terms, including increased support of their retail margins. As purchasing decisions become more centralized, the risks from consolidation increase. A store group could decide to decrease the amount of product purchased from us, modify the amount of floor space allocated to outerwear or other apparel in general or to our products specifically or focus on promoting private label products or national brand products for which it has exclusive rights rather than promoting our products. Customers are also concentrating purchases among a narrowing group of vendors. These types of decisions by our key customers could adversely affect our business.

 

A significant increase in fuel prices could adversely affect our results of operations.

 

Fuel prices have increased significantly at times during the past few years. Increased gasoline prices could adversely affect consumer spending, including discretionary spending on apparel. In addition, higher fuel prices have caused our operating expenses to increase, particularly for freight. Any significant decrease in sales or increase in expenses as a result of higher fuel prices could adversely affect our results of operations.

 

If new legislation restricting the importation or increasing the cost of textiles and apparel produced abroad is enacted, our business could be adversely affected.

 

Legislation that would restrict the importation or increase the cost of textiles and apparel produced abroad has been periodically introduced in Congress. The enactment of new legislation or international trade regulation, or executive action affecting international textile or trade agreements, could adversely affect our business.

International trade agreements that can provide for tariffs and/or quotas can increase the cost and limit the amount of product that can be imported.

 

China’s accession agreement for membership in the World Trade Organization provides that member countries, including the United States, may impose safeguard quotas on specific products. In May 2005, the United States imposed unilateral quotas on several product categories, limiting growth in imports of these categories to 7.5% a year. These safeguard quotas were eliminated in 2009. We are unable to assess the potential for future action by the United States government with respect to any product category in the event that the quantity of imported apparel significantly disrupts the apparel market in the United States. Future action by the United States in response to a disruption in its apparel markets could limit our ability to import apparel and increase our costs.

 

The effects of war or acts of terrorism could adversely affect our business.

 

The continued threat of terrorism, heightened security measures and military action in response to acts of terrorism has, at times, disrupted commerce and intensified concerns regarding the United States economy. Any further acts of terrorism or new or extended hostilities may disrupt commerce and undermine consumer confidence, which could negatively impact our sales and results of operations.

 

Other Risks Relating to Ownership of Our Common Stock

 

Our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer may be in a position to control matters requiring a stockholder vote.

 

As of April 1, 2010, Morris Goldfarb, our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, beneficially owned approximately 17.2% of our common stock. His significant role in our management and his reputation in the apparel industry could make his support crucial to the approval of any major transaction involving us. As a result, he may have the ability to control the outcome on matters requiring stockholder approval including, but not limited to, the election of directors and any merger, consolidation or sale of all or substantially all of our assets. He also may have the ability to control our management and affairs.

 

The price of our common stock has fluctuated significantly and could continue to fluctuate significantly.

 

Between February 1, 2007 and April 1, 2010, the market price of our common stock has ranged from a high of $28.78 per share to a low of $3.24. The market price of our common stock may change significantly in response to various factors and events beyond our control, including:

 

 

Our actual financial results might vary from our publicly disclosed financial forecasts.

 

From time to time, we publicly disclose financial forecasts. Our forecasts reflect numerous assumptions concerning our expected performance, as well as other factors that are beyond our control and that might not turn out to be correct. As a result, variations from our forecasts could be material. Our financial results are subject to numerous risks and uncertainties, including those identified throughout this “Risk Factors” section and elsewhere in

this Annual Report and in the documents incorporated by reference in this Annual Report. If our actual financial results are worse than our financial forecasts, the price of our common stock may decline.

 

We recorded significant charges for the impairment of goodwill and trademarks during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2009 which caused us to report a net loss for fiscal 2009. If our goodwill and other intangibles become further impaired, we may be required to record additional charges to earnings.

 

We recorded aggregate charges of $33.5 million in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2009 for impairment charges related to goodwill in our non-licensed apparel segment and one of our trademarks. As a result, we reported a net loss for fiscal 2009. As of January 31, 2010, we had goodwill and other intangibles in an aggregate amount of $45.9 million, or approximately 13.8% of our total assets and 19.8% of our stockholders’ equity. Under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, we review our goodwill and other intangibles for impairment annually during the fourth quarter of each fiscal year and when events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying value may not be recoverable. The carrying value of our goodwill and other intangibles may not be recoverable due to factors such as a decline in our stock price and market capitalization, reduced estimates of future cash flows and profitability and slower growth rates in our industry. Our impairment charges in fiscal 2009 were primarily the result of a decrease in our market capitalization and, to a lesser extent, from a decrease in projected revenues and profitability for one of our proprietary brands. Estimates of future cash flows and profitability are based on an updated long-term financial outlook of our operations. However, actual performance in the near-term or long-term could be materially different from these forecasts, which could impact future estimates. A further significant decline in our market capitalization or further deterioration in our projected results could result in additional impairment of goodwill and/or intangibles. We may be required to record a significant charge to earnings in our financial statements during a period in which an impairment of our goodwill is determined to exist, as happened in fiscal 2009, which would negatively impact our results of operations and could negatively impact our stock price.

 

We are subject to significant corporate regulation as a public company and failure to comply with all applicable regulations could subject us to liability or negatively affect our stock price.

 

As a publicly traded company, we are subject to a significant body of regulation, including the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. While we have developed and instituted corporate compliance programs and continue to update our programs in response to newly implemented or changing regulatory requirements, we cannot provide assurance that we are or will be in compliance with all potentially applicable corporate regulations. If we fail to comply with any of these regulations, we could be subject to a range of regulatory actions, fines or other sanctions or litigation.

 

The internal control over financial reporting required by the Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act may not prevent or detect misstatements because of certain of its limitations, including the possibility of human error, the circumvention or overriding of controls, or fraud. As a result, even effective internal controls may not provide reasonable assurances with respect to the preparation and presentation of financial statements. We cannot provide assurance that, in the future, our management will not find a material weakness in connection with its annual review of our internal control over financial reporting pursuant to Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. We also cannot provide assurance that we could correct any such weakness to allow our management to assess the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of the end of our fiscal year in time to enable our independent registered public accounting firm to state that such assessment will have been fairly stated in our Annual Report on Form 10-K or state that we have maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of the end of our fiscal year. If we must disclose any material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting, our stock price could decline.

 

 

None.

 

 

Our executive offices, sales showrooms and support staff are located at 512 Seventh Avenue in New York City. In March 2010, we entered into amendments to our leases related to our space in 512 Seventh Avenue that extended the term of our leases and provided for a common expiration date of March 31, 2023 for all of our space in this building, with a five year renewal option. Prior to the amendments, we leased approximately 69,000 square feet in this building. The amendments added an aggregate of approximately 34,000 square feet of space to our leases and granted us options to lease up to an additional 48,000 square feet of space in this building. Our rent for our space at 512 Seventh Avenue is expected to be approximately $2.8 million in fiscal 2011 and $2.5 million in fiscal 2012, net of landlord contributions. Our annual rent could increase if we were to exercise any of our options for additional space.

 

We also lease approximately 4,000 square feet through April 30, 2011 at a current annual rent of $140,000 in an adjoining building at 500 Seventh Avenue for additional administrative personnel. We assumed a lease in New York City for approximately 20,000 square feet of office and showroom space at 463 Seventh Avenue in connection with the Winlit transaction. The current annual rent is approximately $484,000 and the lease expires in December 2011.

 

In connection with our acquisition of Andrew Marc, we assumed leases in New York City for approximately 21,000 square feet of office and showroom space at 570 Seventh Avenue that expire in December 2010 and for which the current aggregate annual rent is approximately $682,000. We expect to consolidate our Andrew Marc offices into our new space at 512 Seventh Avenue when this lease expires. We also assumed a lease for approximately 109,000 square feet of warehouse, office and retail space in Secaucus, N.J. that expires in July 2011 and for which the aggregate annual rent is approximately $707,000. We expect to consolidate the operations of this warehouse with our new Jamesburg warehouse described below and do not expect to renew the lease for this warehouse.

 

We have a lease for our warehouse and distribution facility, located in Secaucus, New Jersey, through February 2011 covering an aggregate of approximately 205,000 square feet. Annual rent for the premises is approximately $1.2 million. We expect to consolidate the operations of this warehouse with our new Jamesburg warehouse described below and do not expect to renew the lease for this warehouse.

 

We have a lease through January 2014 for another distribution center in South Brunswick, New Jersey. This facility contains approximately 305,000 square feet of space which is used by us for product distribution. Annual rent for this facility is approximately $1.3 million. This facility became fully operational in May 2007 and replaced a smaller 89,000 square foot distribution center previously used by us.

 

In December 2009, we entered into a lease for a new warehouse facility located in Jamesburg, New Jersey, for a term that commences June 1, 2010 and ends December 31, 2020. We also have one five year renewal option. The warehouse consists of approximately 583,000 square feet which we intend to utilize for the warehousing and distribution of our products. The initial fixed rent for the warehouse is approximately $2 million per year, with set increases in months 32, 56 and 92. We will receive an abatement of fixed rent for the first seven months of the lease term, and will also receive certain work allowances from the landlord. We expect to begin using this warehouse in September 2010.

 

A majority of our finished goods is shipped to our New Jersey warehouse and distribution facilities for final reshipment to customers. We also use third-party warehouses to accommodate our finished goods storage and reshipment needs. We expect to reduce our use of third party warehouses after our new Jamesburg facility is fully operational.

 

In connection with our acquisition of Wilsons, we assumed a lease in Brooklyn Park, Minnesota for an office, warehouse and distribution facility of approximately 358,000 square feet for which the aggregate annual rent was approximately $1.4 million. This lease expired in May 2009. We entered into a new lease for 155,000 square feet at a current aggregate annual rent of approximately $591,000. This lease commenced in June 2009 and expires in May 2012.

As of January 31, 2010, we operated 121 leased store locations, of which 118 are located in outlet centers. Most leases require us to pay annual minimum rent plus a contingent rent dependent on the store’s annual sales in excess of a specified threshold. In addition, the leases generally require us to pay costs such as real estate taxes and common area maintenance costs. Outlet store leases are typically 5 to 10 years in duration. Our leases expire at varying dates through 2019. During fiscal 2010, we entered into 1 new store lease, renewed 11 store leases and allowed 2 store leases to expire. The following table indicates the periods during which our retail leases expire.

 

 

 

In the ordinary course of our business, we are subject to periodic lawsuits, investigations and claims. Although we cannot predict with certainty the ultimate resolution of lawsuits, investigations and claims asserted against us, we do not believe that any currently pending legal proceeding or proceedings to which we are a party will have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.

 

 

PART II

 

 

Market For Common Stock

 

Our Common Stock is quoted on the Nasdaq Global Select Market under the trading symbol “GIII”. The following table sets forth, for the fiscal periods shown, the high and low sales prices for our Common Stock, as reported by the Nasdaq.

 

 

The last sales price of our Common Stock as reported by the Nasdaq Global Select Market on April 14, 2010 was $28.00 per share.

 

On April 14, 2010, there were 48 holders of record and, we believe, approximately 950 beneficial owners of our Common Stock.

 

Dividend Policy

 

Our Board of Directors currently intends to follow a policy of retaining any earnings to finance the growth and development of our business and does not anticipate paying cash dividends in the foreseeable future. Any future determination as to the payment of cash dividends will be dependent upon our financial condition, results of operations and other factors deemed relevant by the Board. Our loan agreement limits payments for cash dividends and stock redemptions to $1.5 million plus an additional amount based on the proceeds of sales of equity securities. See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Liquidity and Capital Resources” in Item 7 below and Note F to our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

Performance Graph

 

The following Performance Graph and related information shall not be deemed to be “filed” with the Securities and Exchange Commission, nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, each as amended, except to the extent that we specifically incorporate it by reference into such filing.

 

The Securities and Exchange Commission require;s us to present a chart comparing the cumulative total stockholder return on our Common Stock with the cumulative total stockholder return of (i) a broad equity market index and (ii) a published industry index or peer group. This chart compares the Common Stock with (i) the S&P 500 Composite Index and (ii) the S&P Textiles Index, and assumes an investment of $100 on January 31, 2005 in each of the Common Stock, the stocks comprising the S&P 500 Composite Index and the stocks comprising the S&P Textile Index.

 

G-III Apparel Group, Ltd.
Comparison of Cumulative Total Return
(January 31, 2005 — January 31, 2010)

 

 

 

The selected consolidated financial data set forth below as of and for the years ended January 31, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009 and 2010, have been derived from our audited consolidated financial statements. Our audited consolidated balance sheets as of January 31, 2006, 2007 and 2008, and our audited consolidated statements of income for the years ended January 31, 2006 and 2007, are not included in this filing. The selected consolidated financial data should be read in conjunction with “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” (Item 7 of this Report) and the audited consolidated financial statements and related notes thereto included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

 

Our results of operations for the year ended January 31, 2006 include the results of our Marvin Richards and Winlit divisions from July 11, 2005, the date we acquired the stock of Marvin Richards and certain assets from Winlit. Results for fiscal 2008 include the operating results of the Jessica Howard business from May 24, 2007, the date of acquisition. Results for fiscal 2009 include the operating results of the (i) Andrew Marc business from February 11, 2008, the date of acquisition, and (ii) Wilsons retail outlet business from July 8, 2008, the date of acquisition.

 

 

 

 

Unless the context otherwise requires, “G-III”, “us”, “we” and “our” refer to G-III Apparel Group, Ltd. and its subsidiaries. References to fiscal years refer to the year ended or ending on January 31 of that year. For example, our fiscal year ended January 31, 2010 is referred to as “fiscal 2010.”

 

The following presentation of management’s discussion and analysis of our consolidated financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with our financial statements, the accompanying notes and other financial information appearing elsewhere in this Report.

 

Overview

 

G-III designs, manufactures, and markets an extensive range of outerwear, sportswear and dresses, including coats, jackets, pants and women’s suits. We sell our products under licensed brands, our own proprietary brands and private retail labels. G-III also operates 121 retail stores, 118 of which are outlet stores operated under the Wilsons Leather name. While our products are sold at a variety of price points through a broad mix of retail partners and our own outlet stores, a majority of our sales are concentrated with our ten largest customers. Sales to our ten largest customers were 59.7% of our net sales in fiscal 2008, 53.8% of our net sales in fiscal 2009 and 55.0% of our net sales in fiscal 2010.

 

Our business is dependent on, among other things, retailer and consumer demand for our products. We believe that significant economic uncertainty and a slowdown in the global macroeconomic environment continue to negatively impact the level of consumer spending for discretionary items. The current depressed economic environment has been characterized by a decline in consumer discretionary spending that has affected retailers and sellers of consumer goods, particularly those whose goods are viewed as discretionary purchases, such as fashion apparel and related products, such as ours. We cannot predict the direction in which the current economic downturn will move. Continued uncertain macroeconomic conditions and concerns about the access of retailers and consumers to credit may have a negative impact on our results for fiscal 2011.

 

We operate in fashion markets that are intensely competitive. Our ability to continuously evaluate and respond to changing consumer demands and tastes, across multiple market segments, distribution channels and geographies is critical to our success. Although our portfolio of brands is aimed at diversifying our risks in this regard, misjudging shifts in consumer preferences could have a negative effect on our business. Our success in the future will depend on our ability to design products that are accepted in the markets we serve, source the manufacture of our products on a competitive basis, and continue to diversify our product portfolio and the markets we serve.

 

We have expanded our portfolio of proprietary and licensed brands for more than 15 years through acquisitions and by entering into license agreements for new brands or for additional products under previously licensed brands. We have made five acquisitions since July 2005 that have helped to broaden our product offerings, expand our ability to serve different tiers of distribution and add a retail component to our business.

 

In May 2007, we acquired specified operating assets of Jessica Howard Ltd. Jessica Howard designs and markets moderate and better dresses, under the proprietary Jessica Howard and Eliza J brands, as well as under private label programs.

 

The acquired Jessica Howard dress operations expanded and complemented our dress business which began shipping under the Calvin Klein label in September 2006. We believe that the capabilities of our Jessica Howard division are helpful to us in seeking additional dress licenses. We added to our dress business in July 2007, when we expanded our license with Ellen Tracy to include dresses and again in July 2008, when we entered into a new license to design and distribute dresses under the Jessica Simpson label. We also intend to grow the existing Jessica Howard and Eliza J brands and expand private label programs to further develop our dress business.

 

In February 2008, we acquired Andrew Marc, a supplier of fine outerwear and handbags for both men and women to upscale specialty and department stores. As a result of this acquisition, we added Andrew Marc and Marc New York as additional company-owned brands and Levi’s and Dockers as additional licensed brands. We believe that the Andrew Marc brand can be leveraged into a variety of new categories to become a meaningful lifestyle

brand for us. Since we acquired Andrew Marc, we have entered into agreements to license the Andrew Marc and Marc New York brands for women’s footwear, men’s accessories, women’s handbags and men’s cold weather accessories. We also launched a Marc New York dress line utilizing our own in-house designers and our manufacturing sources. This line began shipping for the Fall 2009 season.

 

In July 2008, we acquired certain assets of Wilsons The Leather Experts, which had been a national retailer of outerwear and accessories. The assets acquired included 116 outlet store leases, inventory, distribution center operations and the Wilsons name and other related trademarks and trade names.

 

Our retail operations segment, which consists almost entirely of our Wilsons retail outlet store business, had an operating loss during fiscal 2009 and fiscal 2010. For further details regarding the operating results of our Wilsons retail outlet business, see Note N to our Consolidated Financial Statements. We acquired Wilsons during July 2008 when the merchandise plan for the key Fall and Holiday seasons was already set. The difficult economic environment also contributed to a weaker than expected performance by our Wilsons retail business in fiscal 2009. During fiscal 2010, we undertook the following initiatives to improve the performance of our retail outlet business:

 

 

As a result, the amount of the operating loss in our retail segment was reduced in fiscal 2010. We continue to believe that operation of the Wilsons retail stores is part of our core competency, as outerwear comprised about one-half of our net sales at Wilsons in fiscal 2010, the first full year of operation for us. We expect to continue to implement and refine these initiatives with a view to creating a store concept that is capable of building growth and profitability over the long-term.

 

Our acquisitions are part of our strategy to expand our product offerings and increase the portfolio of proprietary and licensed brands that we offer through different tiers of retail distribution and at a variety of price points. We believe that both Andrew Marc and the Wilsons retail outlet business leverage our core strength in outerwear and provide us with new avenues for growth. We also believe that these acquisitions complement our other licensed brands, G-III owned labels and private label programs.

 

We market our products to department, specialty and mass merchant retail stores in the United States. We also supply our outerwear to our Wilsons outlet stores and to our Wilsons e-commerce business. We launched a website for Andrew Marc product to further expand our e-commerce presence.

 

We operate our business in three segments, wholesale licensed apparel, wholesale non-licensed apparel and retail operations. The wholesale licensed apparel segment includes sales of apparel brands licensed by us from third parties. The wholesale non-licensed apparel segment includes sales of apparel under our own brands and private label brands. The retail segment consists almost entirely of the Wilsons retail outlet stores we acquired in July 2008, now operating as AM Retail Group, Inc.

 

The sale of licensed product has been a key element of our business strategy for many years. As part of this strategy, we continue to add new fashion and sports apparel licenses. We have expanded our relationship with Calvin Klein by adding licenses for women’s performance wear in December 2007 and for better women’s sportswear in August 2008. We began limited shipments of women’s performance wear for the Spring 2008 season and expanded distribution for the Fall 2008 season. We began shipping women’s better sportswear for the Spring 2009 season. In July 2008, we entered into a license agreement to design and distribute Jessica Simpson dresses, which we began shipping for the Spring 2009 season. During fiscal 2010, we entered into a new license agreement for Enyce men’s and women’s outerwear. We also expanded our relationship with Ellen Tracy to include men’s outerwear and with Sean John to include boys’ outerwear.

We believe that consumers prefer to buy brands they know and we have continually sought licenses that would increase the portfolio of name brands we can offer through different tiers of retail distribution, for a wide array of products and at a variety of price points. We believe that brand owners will look to consolidate the number of licensees they engage to develop product and they will seek licensees with a successful track record of developing brands. We are continually having discussions with licensors regarding new opportunities.

 

It is our objective to continue to expand our product offerings. The sale of licensed product accounted for 65.4% of our net sales (73.5% of net sales of wholesale apparel) in fiscal 2010 compared to 60.5% of our net sales (68.0% of net sales of wholesale apparel) in fiscal 2009 and 70.3% of our net sales in fiscal 2008. For comparability purposes, we have included the percentage that sales of licensed apparel accounted for of our wholesale sales in fiscal 2009 and fiscal 2010, which consists of sales in our licensed and non-licensed apparel segments, as we added a retail segment in fiscal 2009 as a result of our acquisition of the Wilsons retail outlet business.

 

Significant trends that affect the apparel industry include the continuing consolidation of retail chains, the desire on the part of retailers to consolidate vendors supplying them, and a shift in consumer shopping preferences away from traditional department stores to other mid-tier and specialty store venues.

 

Retailers are seeking to expand the differentiation of their offerings by devoting more resources to the development of exclusive products, whether by focusing on their own private label products or on products produced exclusively for a retailer by a national brand manufacturer. Retailers are placing more emphasis on building strong images for their private label merchandise. Exclusive brands are only made available to a specific retailer, and thus customers loyal to their brands can only find them in the stores of that retailer.

 

The weakness in the economy and financial markets has reduced consumer confidence and consumer spending. There has also been significant downward pressure on average retail prices for many categories of apparel, in large part as a result of the weakness of the economy.

 

A number of retailers are experiencing significant financial difficulties, which in some cases has resulted in bankruptcies, liquidations and/or store closings. The financial difficulties of a retail customer of ours could result in reduced business with that customer. We may also assume higher credit risk relating to receivables of a retail customer experiencing financial difficulty that could result in higher reserves for doubtful accounts or increased write-offs of accounts receivable. We attempt to lower credit risk from our customers by closely monitoring accounts receivable balances and shipping levels, as well as the ongoing financial performance and credit standing of customers.

 

We have attempted to respond to these trends by continuing to focus on selling products with recognized brand equity, by attention to design, quality and value and by improving our sourcing capabilities. We have also responded with the strategic acquisitions made by us and new license agreements entered into by us that have added additional licensed and proprietary brands and helped diversify our business by adding new product lines, additional distribution channels and a retail component to our business. We believe that our broad distribution capabilities help us to respond to the various shifts by consumers between distribution channels and that our operational capabilities will enable us to continue to be a vendor of choice for our retail partners.

 

Use of Estimates and Critical Accounting Policies

 

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Significant accounting policies employed by us, including the use of estimates, are presented in the notes to our consolidated financial statements.

 

Critical accounting policies are those that are most important to the portrayal of our financial condition and our results of operations, and require management’s most difficult, subjective and complex judgments, as a result of the need to make estimates about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain. Our most critical accounting estimates, discussed below, pertain to revenue recognition, accounts receivable, inventories, income taxes, sales taxes, goodwill and intangible assets and stock-based compensation. In determining these estimates, management must use amounts that are based upon its informed judgments and best estimates. On an on-going basis, we evaluate our estimates, including those related to customer allowances and discounts, product returns, bad debts and

inventories, and carrying values of intangible assets. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that we believe are reasonable under the circumstances. The results of these estimates form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions and conditions.

 

Revenue Recognition

 

Goods are shipped to retailers in accordance with specific customer orders. We recognize wholesale sales when the risks and rewards of ownership have transferred to the customer, determined by us to be when title to the merchandise passes to the customer. In addition, we act as an agent in brokering sales between customers and overseas factories. On these transactions, we recognize commission fee income on sales that are financed by and shipped directly to our customers. Title to goods shipped by overseas vendors transfers to customers when the goods have been delivered to the customer. We recognize commission income upon the completion of the delivery by our vendors to the customer. We recognize retail sales upon customer receipt of our merchandise, generally at the point of sale. Our sales are recorded net of applicable sales tax. Net sales take into account reserves for returns and allowances. We estimate the amount of reserves and allowances based on current and historical information and trends. Sales are reported net of returns, discounts and allowances. Discounts, allowances and estimates of future returns are recognized when the related revenues are recognized.

 

Accounts Receivable

 

In the normal course of business, we extend credit to our wholesale customers based on pre-defined credit criteria. Accounts receivable, as shown on our consolidated balance sheet, are net of allowances and anticipated discounts. In circumstances where we are aware of a specific customer’s inability to meet its financial obligation (such as in the case of bankruptcy filings or substantial downgrading by credit sources), a specific reserve for bad debts is recorded against amounts due to reduce the net recognized receivable to the amount reasonably expected to be collected. For all other wholesale customers, an allowance for doubtful accounts is determined through analysis of the aging of accounts receivable at the date of the financial statements, assessments of collectability based on historical trends and an evaluation of the impact of economic conditions.

 

An allowance for discounts is based on reviews of open invoices where concessions have been extended to customers. Costs associated with allowable deductions for customer advertising expenses are charged to advertising expenses in the selling, general and administrative section of our consolidated statements of income. Costs associated with markdowns and other operational charge backs, net of historical recoveries, are included as a reduction of net sales. All of these are part of the allowances included in accounts receivable. We reserve against known charge backs, as well as for an estimate of potential future deductions by customers. These provisions result from seasonal negotiations with our customers as well as historical deduction trends, net of historical recoveries and the evaluation of current market conditions.

 

Inventories

 

Wholesale inventories are stated at lower of cost (determined by the first-in, first-out method) or market. We reduce the carrying cost of inventories for obsolete or slow moving items as necessary to properly reflect inventory value. The cost elements included in inventory consist of all direct costs of merchandise, inbound freight and merchandise acquisition costs such as commissions and import fees. Retail inventories are valued at the lower of cost or market as determined by the retail inventory method. Retail inventory cost includes the cost of merchandise, inbound freight, duty and other merchandise-specific charges.

 

We continually evaluate the composition of our inventories, assessing slow-turning, ongoing product as well as fashion product from prior seasons. The market value of distressed inventory is based on historical sales trends of our individual product lines, the impact of market trends and economic conditions, expected permanent retail markdowns and the value of current orders for this type of inventory. A provision is recorded to reduce the cost of inventories to the estimated net realizable values, if required.

Income Taxes

 

As part of the process of preparing our consolidated financial statements, we are required to estimate our income taxes in each of the jurisdictions in which we operate. This process involves estimating our actual current tax exposure, together with assessing temporary differences resulting from differing treatment of items for tax and accounting purposes. These differences result in deferred tax assets and liabilities, which are included within our consolidated balance sheet.

 

Goodwill and Intangible Assets

 

In July 2005, we acquired Marvin Richards and specified operating assets of Winlit, in May 2007, we acquired specified operating assets of Jessica Howard and in February 2008, we acquired Andrew Marc. ASC 350 requires that goodwill and intangible assets with an indefinite life be tested for impairment at least annually. Goodwill and intangible assets with an indefinite life are required to be written down when impaired, rather than amortized as previous accounting standards required. Goodwill and intangible assets with an indefinite life are tested for impairment by comparing the fair value of the reporting unit with its carrying value. Fair value is generally determined using discounted cash flows, market multiples and market capitalization. Significant estimates used in the fair value methodologies include estimates of future cash flows, future short-term and long-term growth rates, weighted average cost of capital and estimates of market multiples of the reportable unit. If these estimates or their related assumptions change in the future, we may be required to record impairment charges for our goodwill and intangible assets with an indefinite life. Our annual impairment test is performed in the fourth quarter each year.

 

The process of evaluating the potential impairment of goodwill is subjective and requires significant judgment at many points during the analysis. In estimating the fair value of a reporting unit for the purposes of our annual or periodic analyses, we make estimates and judgments about the future cash flows of that reporting unit. Although our cash flow forecasts are based on assumptions that are consistent with our plans and estimates we are using to manage the underlying businesses, there is significant exercise of judgment involved in determining the cash flows attributable to a reporting unit over its estimated remaining useful life. In addition, we make certain judgments about allocating shared assets to the estimated balance sheets of our reporting units. We also consider our and our competitor’s market capitalization on the date we perform the analysis. Changes in judgment on these assumptions and estimates could result in a goodwill impairment charge.

 

We allocated the purchase price of the companies we acquired in fiscal 2006, fiscal 2008 and fiscal 2009 to the tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed, based on their estimated fair values. These valuations require management to make significant estimations and assumptions, especially with respect to intangible assets. The amount allocated to goodwill was increased with respect to each of fiscal 2007, fiscal 2008 and fiscal 2009, as a result of additional payments made based on the performance of Marvin Richards and Winlit. The amount allocated to goodwill also increased in fiscal 2008 as a result of the acquisition of Jessica Howard. In fiscal 2009 as a result of the acquisition of Andrew Marc, $20.0 million was allocated to goodwill and $13.2 million was allocated to trademarks with an indefinite life. There was no goodwill associated with our acquisition in July 2008 of the Wilsons retail outlet business.

 

Critical estimates in valuing intangible assets include future expected cash flows from license agreements, trade names and customer relationships. In addition, other factors considered are the brand awareness and market position of the products sold by the acquired companies and assumptions about the period of time the brand will continue to be used in the combined company’s product portfolio. Management’s estimates of fair value are based on assumptions believed to be reasonable, but which are inherently uncertain and unpredictable.

 

If we did not appropriately allocate these components or we incorrectly estimate the useful lives of these components, our computation of depreciation and amortization expense may not appropriately reflect the actual impact of these costs over future periods, which will affect our net income.

 

Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price and related costs over the value assigned to net tangible and identifiable intangible assets of businesses acquired and accounted for under the purchase method. We review and test our goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite lives for impairment at least annually, or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of such assets may be impaired. We perform

our test in the fourth fiscal quarter of each year using a combination of a discounted cash flow analysis and a market approach. The discounted cash flow approach requires that certain assumptions and estimates be made regarding industry economic factors and future profitability. The market approach estimates the fair value based on comparisons with the market values and market multiples of earnings and revenues of similar public companies. The fair values derived from these two methodologies are then compared to the carrying value of the respective segments. As a result of the fiscal 2009 impairment analysis, we determined that the goodwill balance existing in our non-licensed apparel segment was impaired as a result of adverse equity market conditions which caused a decline in industry market multiples and reduced fair values from our projected cash flows. Accordingly, we recorded a non-cash goodwill impairment charge of $31.2 million in fiscal 2009.

 

Trademarks having finite lives are amortized over their estimated useful lives and measured for impairment when events or circumstances indicate that the carrying value may be impaired. Sales and profitability for our Marvin Richard’s brand have significantly deteriorated and are not expected to recover. As a result, we recorded an impairment charge of $2.3 million to this trademark in fiscal 2009.

 

Stock-based Compensation

 

All share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options, are recognized as compensation expense over the service period (generally the vesting period) in the consolidated financial statements based on their fair values. We utilize the Black-Scholes option pricing model to estimate the fair value of stock-based compensation at the date of grant. The Black-Scholes model requires subjective assumptions regarding dividend yields, expected volatility, expected life of options and risk-free interest rates. These assumptions reflect management’s best estimates. Changes in these inputs and assumptions can materially affect the estimate of fair value and the amount of our stock-based compensation expenses. We recognized stock-based compensation of approximately $703,000 in fiscal 2008, $1.4 million in fiscal 2009 and $1.9 million in fiscal 2010. As of February 1, 2010, there was approximately $5.5 million of total unrecognized stock-based compensation expense related to non-vested stock-based compensation granted by us. These expenses are expected to be recognized by us through January 31, 2015.

 

Results of Operations

 

The following table sets forth selected operating data as a percentage of our net sales for the fiscal years indicated below:

 

Year ended January 31, 2010 (“fiscal 2010”) compared to year ended January 31, 2009 (“fiscal 2009”)

 

Net sales for fiscal 2010 increased to $800.9 million from $711.1 million in the prior year. Net sales of wholesale licensed apparel accounted for 65.4% of our net sales in fiscal 2010 compared to 60.5% of our net sales in fiscal 2009. Excluding net sales in the retail segment, net sales of wholesale licensed apparel accounted for 73.5% of net sales of wholesale apparel in fiscal 2010 and 68.0% of net sales of wholesale apparel in fiscal 2009. Net sales of wholesale licensed apparel increased to $523.6 million in fiscal 2010 from $430.2 million in fiscal 2009. This increase was primarily the result of an increase of $99.0 million in net sales of Calvin Klein licensed product, primarily attributable to sales of Calvin Klein sportswear which began shipping in the first quarter of fiscal 2010 and increased sales of Calvin Klein dresses.

 

Net sales of wholesale non-licensed apparel decreased to $188.3 million in fiscal 2010 from $202.4 million in fiscal 2009, primarily due to a decrease of $18.0 million in net sales of private label outerwear and sportswear offset, in part, by an increase $6.2 million in net sales of our Andrew Marc and Marc New York products.

 

Net sales of our retail operations were $126.6 million in fiscal 2010 compared to $78.5 million in fiscal 2009. The Wilsons retail outlet stores were acquired on July 11, 2008. All income statement items relating to our retail outlet operations for fiscal 2009 are included only from the date of acquisition.

 

Gross profit increased to $266.9 million, or 33.3% of net sales, for fiscal 2010, from $200.7 million, or 28.2% of net sales, in the prior year. Our gross profit as a percentage of net sales increased due to increased gross margin in all three of our segments. The gross profit in our wholesale licensed apparel segment increased to $156.2 million, or 29.8% of net sales, for fiscal 2010 from $119.5 million, or 27.8% of net sales, in the prior year primarily due to an increase in gross profit of our Calvin Klein products. The gross profit in our wholesale non-licensed apparel segment increased to $53.7 million in fiscal 2010, or 28.5% of net sales, from $51.4 million, or 25.4% of net sales, in fiscal 2009. The gross profit percentage in our wholesale non-licensed apparel segment was positively impacted by higher margins on our Andrew Marc product and in our Jessica Howard dress division. The gross profit in our retail operations segment increased to $57.0 million or 45.0% of net sales for fiscal 2010 from $29.8 million, or 37.9% of net sales, for fiscal 2009. The gross profit in our retail operations segment increased primarily because we owned Wilsons for the entire year in fiscal 2010 and the gross profit percentage increased primarily because of reduced markdowns and stronger initial mark ups as a result of our improved merchandising.

 

Selling, general and administrative expenses increased to $205.3 million in fiscal 2010 from $164.1 million in the prior year. Selling, general and administrative expenses increased primarily as a result of expenses related to the Wilsons retail business ($24.3 million) which were included for the entire period in fiscal 2010 and only from the date of acquisition (July 2008) in fiscal 2009. In addition, there were increases in personnel costs ($11.4 million), advertising and promotion expenses ($3.1 million) and third party warehousing costs ($2.0 million). Personnel costs increased primarily as a result of higher bonus payments associated with higher profitability. Advertising costs increased because sales of licensed product increased and we typically pay an advertising fee under our license agreements based on a percentage of sales of licensed product. Third party warehousing costs increased as a result of our increased shipping volume.

 

There were no impairment charges in fiscal 2010. As a result of our annual impairment analysis in fiscal 2009, we recorded a goodwill impairment charge of $31.2 million and a trademark impairment charge of $2.3 million in our non-licensed apparel segment resulting primarily from adverse equity market conditions which caused a decline in industry market multiples and reduced fair values from our projected cash flows.

 

Depreciation and amortization decreased to $5.4 million in fiscal 2010 from $6.9 million for the prior year primarily as a result of certain intangible assets that became fully amortized during fiscal 2009.

 

Interest and finance charges, net for fiscal 2010 decreased to $4.7 million from $5.6 million in the prior year. The lower interest expense is a result of the decrease in the prime rate and LIBOR.

 

Income tax expense for fiscal 2010 increased to $19.8 million from $4.6 million in the prior year. The effective rate for fiscal 2010 was 38.4% compared to an effective tax rate for fiscal 2009 of 48.6%. The effective rate in fiscal 2010 was positively impacted by additional net operating losses recorded in connection with the acquisition of

Andrew Marc. The effective tax rate in fiscal 2009 was negatively impacted by the impairment charges recorded in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2009.

 

Year ended January 31, 2009 (“fiscal 2009”) compared to year ended January 31, 2008 (“fiscal 2008”)

 

Net sales for fiscal 2009 increased to $711.1 million from $518.9 million in the prior year. Net sales of wholesale licensed apparel accounted for 60.5% of our net sales in fiscal 2009 compared to 70.3% of our net sales in fiscal 2008. The decrease in the percentage of net sales of wholesale licensed apparel is primarily attributable to the addition of the new retail segment in fiscal 2009. Excluding net sales in the retail segment, net sales of wholesale licensed apparel accounted for 68.0% of net sales of wholesale apparel in fiscal 2009, which includes the licensed and non-licensed segments that constituted all of our business prior to fiscal 2009. Net sales of wholesale licensed apparel increased to $430.2 million in fiscal 2009 from $365.0 million in fiscal 2008. This increase was primarily the result of an increase of $38.5 million in net sales of Calvin Klein licensed product, $18.3 million in net sales of Dockers and Levi’s licensed product added as a result of the acquisition of Andrew Marc in fiscal 2009 and an increase of $10.2 million in net sales of Guess licensed product. Our Calvin Klein licensed product consists of men’s and women’s outerwear, women’s suits, dresses, performance wear and sportswear. The Dockers, Levi’s and Guess licensed product consists of men’s and women’s outerwear.

 

Net sales of wholesale non-licensed apparel increased to $202.4 million in fiscal 2009 from $153.9 million in fiscal 2008, primarily due to the addition of $41.1 million of net sales of non-licensed apparel as a result of the acquisition of Andrew Marc and an increase of $27.2 million in net sales by the Jessica Howard business, all of which constituted sales of proprietary branded or private label product. Fiscal 2008 did not include a full year of net sales for Jessica Howard as we acquired this business in May 2007. The increase in net sales of wholesale non-licensed apparel was offset, in part, by decreases of $13.9 million in net sales in the Marvin Richards division and $6.2 million in net sales of Exsto branded sales. Net sales of our retail operations were $78.5 million in fiscal 2009. Almost all of these sales were from the Wilsons retail outlet stores we acquired in July 2008.

 

Gross profit increased to $200.7 million, or 28.2% of net sales, for fiscal 2009, from $139.5 million, or 26.9% of net sales, in the prior year. Our gross profit percentage in the prior year was negatively impacted by a $3.0 million charge incurred as the result of a payment related to our guarantee of purchase commitments by a long-standing vendor that is no longer in business. Of this charge, $2.0 million related to our wholesale licensed apparel segment and $1.0 million related to our wholesale non-licensed apparel segment. The gross profit percentage in our wholesale licensed apparel segment was 27.8% for fiscal 2009 compared to 28.6% in the prior year primarily due to the decreased margin for our sports licensed product in fiscal 2009. The gross profit percentage in our wholesale non-licensed segment was 25.4% for fiscal 2009 compared to 22.8% in the same period last year. This percentage was positively impacted by higher margins on sales of Andrew Marc non-licensed product compared to other products comprising our wholesale non-licensed segment. The gross profit percentage in our retail segment was 37.9% for fiscal 2009. We did not have a retail operations segment in fiscal 2008.

 

Selling, general and administrative expenses increased to $164.1 million in fiscal 2009 from $101.7 million in the prior year. Selling, general and administrative expenses increased primarily as a result of our acquisitions of Wilsons ($34.0 million since July 2008), Andrew Marc ($13.9 million) and Jessica Howard ($4.3 million). The current year included a full year of operations for the Jessica Howard business. We also experienced increases in our Calvin Klein business ($4.9 million) as we expanded into new women’s sportswear and performance wear lines and continued to grow the Calvin Klein dress line from the prior year.

 

As a result of our annual impairment analysis, we recorded a goodwill impairment charge of $31.2 million and a trademark impairment charge of $2.3 million in our non-licensed segment in fiscal 2009 resulting primarily from adverse equity market conditions which caused a decline in industry market multiples and reduced fair values from our projected cash flows. These impairment charges do not impact our business operations, cash flows or compliance with the financial covenants in our financing agreement. There was no impairment charge in the prior year.

 

Depreciation and amortization increased to $6.9 million in fiscal 2009 from $5.4 million in the prior year primarily as a result of the depreciation and amortization of assets acquired from Andrew Marc ($930,000) and Wilsons ($504,000).

Interest and finance charges, net for fiscal 2009 increased to $5.6 million from $3.2 million in the prior year. Interest expense increased due to a higher average borrowing throughout the year primarily to finance the acquisition of Andrew Marc and Wilsons.

 

Income tax expense for fiscal 2009 decreased to $4.6 million from $11.7 million in the prior year. Excluding the pre-tax impairment charge recorded in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2009, the effective tax rate for fiscal 2009 was 40.4% compared to 40.1% for the prior year. The prior year rate was positively impacted by the reversal of restructuring reserves in the amount of $860,000. This amount was not included in our taxable income because it was not deducted for tax purposes when recorded.

 

Liquidity and Capital Resources

 

Our primary operating cash requirements are to fund our seasonal build up in inventories and accounts receivable, primarily during the second and third fiscal quarters each year. Due to the seasonality of our business, we generally reach our maximum borrowing under our asset-based credit facility during our third fiscal quarter. The primary sources to meet our operating cash requirements have been borrowings under this credit facility and cash generated from operations. We also raised cash from offerings of our common stock in March 2007 and December 2009 as described below. We were in a net cash position of $46.8 million at January 31, 2010 compared to a net borrowing position of $26.5 million at January 31, 2009.

 

Public Offerings

 

In December 2009, we sold 1,907,010 shares of our common stock, including 207,010 shares sold pursuant to the exercise of the underwriters’ over-allotment option, at a public offering price of $19.50 per share. We received net proceeds of $34.7 million from this offering after payment of the underwriting discount and expenses of the offering. The net proceeds we received are expected to be used for general corporate purposes to support the growth of our business.

 

In March 2007, we completed a public offering of 4,500,000 shares of our common stock, of which 1,621,000 shares were offered by us and 2,879,000 shares were offered by selling stockholders, at a public offering price of $20.00 per share. We received net proceeds of $30.3 million from this offering after payment of the underwriting discount and expenses of the offering. In April 2007, we received additional net proceeds of $6.0 million in connection with the sale of 313,334 shares pursuant to the exercise of the underwriters’ overallotment option. The net proceeds we received were used for general corporate purposes.

 

Financing Agreement

 

We have a financing agreement with JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Agent for a consortium of banks. The financing agreement, which extends through July 2011, is a senior secured revolving credit facility providing for borrowings in the aggregate principal amount of up to $250 million. This financing agreement replaced our prior financing agreement that consisted of a revolving line of credit of up to $165 million and a term loan in the initial principal amount of $30 million.

 

The financing agreement provides for a maximum revolving line of credit of $250 million. Amounts available under the line are subject to borrowing base formulas and over advances as specified in the financing agreement. Borrowings under the line of credit bear interest, at our option, at the prime rate plus 0.75% (4.0% at March 31, 2010) or LIBOR plus 3.0% (3.25% at March 31, 2010).

 

The amount borrowed under the line of credit has varied based on our seasonal requirements. The maximum amount outstanding, including open letters of credit, under our line of credit was approximately $108.7 million in fiscal 2008, $235.1 million in fiscal 2009 and $212.5 million in fiscal 2010. At January 31, 2009, there were direct borrowings in the amount of $29.0 million outstanding, and at January 31, 2010 there were no direct borrowings outstanding. Our contingent liability under open letters of credit was approximately $8.1 million at January 31, 2009 and $13.6 million at January 31, 2010.

 

The prior financing agreement included a term loan in the original principal amount of $30 million that was payable over three years with eleven quarterly installments of principal in the amount of $1,650,000 and a balloon

payment due on July 11, 2008, the maturity date of that loan. Mandatory prepayments were required under the term loan commencing with fiscal 2007 to the extent of 50% of excess cash flow, as defined. The amount outstanding under the term loan ($13.1 million at January 31, 2008) was repaid in full from the proceeds of the amended and extended financing agreement.

 

The financing agreement requires us, among other things, to maintain a maximum senior leverage ratio and minimum fixed charge coverage ratio, as defined. It also limits payments for cash dividends and stock redemption to $1.5 million plus an additional amount based on the proceeds of sales of equity securities. As of January 31, 2010, we were in compliance with these covenants. The financing agreement is secured by all of our assets.

 

Cash from Operating Activities

 

At January 31, 2010, we had cash and cash equivalents of $46.8 million. We generated $44.0 million of cash from operating activities in fiscal 2010. Cash was generated primarily from our net income of $31.7 million, an increase in accrued expenses of $10.0 million and non-cash depreciation and amortization charges of $5.4 million. Accrued expenses increased primarily as a result of higher accrued bonuses associated with higher profitability.

 

At January 31, 2009, we had cash and cash equivalents of $2.5 million. We generated $22.5 million of cash from operating activities in fiscal 2009. Cash was generated primarily from our increases in accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities of $24.7 million and non-cash impairment charges of $33.5 million and depreciation and amortization of $6.9 million offset in part by an increase of $28.7 million in inventory and our net loss of $14.0 million. Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities increased as a result of the acquired retail outlet business, the timing of our contractual royalty and advertising payments to licensors and higher inventory purchases. The increase in inventory was attributable to several factors, including inventory for new lines of business, such as Calvin Klein sportswear and Jessica Simpson dresses, more on hand inventory for our retail business due to its seasonality, additional inventory to support increased sales volume and the timing of receipt of product for certain divisions.

 

At January 31, 2008, we had cash and cash equivalents of $38.3 million. We generated $10.6 million of cash from operating activities in fiscal 2008. Cash was generated primarily from our net income of $17.5 million, increases in accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities of $13.3 million, and non-cash charges for depreciation and amortization of $5.4 million offset by an increase of $18.4 million in inventory and $6.0 million in accounts receivable. The increases in accounts payable and inventory are attributable to the inventory purchases for our dress and sportswear businesses. Inventory purchases for our Jessica Howard dress division, which was acquired in May 2007, represents a majority of the increase. The increase in accounts receivable was due to a 30% increase in sales in the fourth quarter in fiscal 2008 compared to the comparable period in the prior year.

 

Cash from Investing Activities

 

In fiscal 2010, we used $7.0 million of cash for investing activities. We used $5.5 million of cash in connection with contingent payments earned as a result of the fiscal 2009 operating results of our Marvin Richards and Winlit divisions. Fiscal 2009 was the last year of our obligation to make these payments. We also used $1.5 million of cash for capital expenditures, primarily for renovating existing showroom space. In December 2009, we entered into a lease for a new warehouse facility. In March 2010, we amended our leases for our existing corporate showrooms and offices to extend the leases and add additional office space. As a result of these new leases, we expect our capital expenditures for fiscal 2011 to be an aggregate of approximately $13.0 million, net of landlord contributions, for the build out and renovation of the additional warehouse facility and office space.

 

In fiscal 2009, we used $75.4 million of cash for investing activities. We used $43.1 million of cash in connection with the acquisition of Andrew Marc in February 2008 and $25.0 million of cash in connection with the acquisition of Wilsons in July and October 2008. We used $4.9 million of cash in connection with contingent payments earned as a result of the fiscal 2008 operating results of our Marvin Richards and Winlit divisions. We also used $2.4 million of cash for capital expenditures, primarily for renovating existing showroom space.

 

We used $13.5 million of cash for investing activities in fiscal 2008. We used $8.3 million of cash in connection with the acquisition of Jessica Howard, including associated fees and expenses. We used $3.7 million of cash in

connection with contingent payments earned as a result of the operating results of our Marvin Richards and Winlit divisions that were acquired in July 2005. We also used $1.4 million of cash for capital expenditures, primarily for renovation of our back office space which was relocated as a result of a lease termination and the completion of our renovation of our new warehouse facility in South Brunswick, NJ.

 

Cash from Financing Activities

 

Cash flows from financing activities provided $7.4 million in fiscal 2010 primarily as a result of net proceeds of $34.7 million from our public offering of common stock in December 2009 offset, in part, by repayments of $29.0 of outstanding borrowings.

 

Cash flows from financing activities provided $17.0 million in fiscal 2009 primarily as a result of an increase of $16.0 million in borrowings under our financing agreement.

 

Cash flows from financing activities provided $29.2 million in fiscal 2008 primarily as a result of net proceeds of $36.5 million from our public offering of common stock in March 2007 offset, in part, by repayments of $8.7 million under our term loan. During fiscal 2008, we made four required installment payments of $1.65 million under our term loan and were also required to make a prepayment of $2.1 million based on excess cash flow as defined in the loan agreement.

 

Financing Needs

 

We believe that our cash on hand and cash generated from operations, together with funds available from our line of credit and recent public offering of common stock, are sufficient to meet our expected operating and capital expenditure requirements. We may seek to acquire other businesses in order to expand our product offerings. We may need additional financing in order to complete one or more acquisitions. We cannot be certain that we will be able to obtain additional financing, if required, on acceptable terms or at all.

 

New Accounting Pronouncements

 

In June 2009, FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“the “Codification”) became effective (ASC Topic 105). This guidance establishes the FASB Accounting Standards Codification as the source of authoritative accounting principles recognized by the FASB to be applied by nongovernmental entities in the preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. The Codification was effective for financial statements issued for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. As a result of the adoption of this pronouncement, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended October 31, 2009 and all subsequent public filings will reference the Codification as the sole source of authoritative literature. Accordingly, all accounting references have been updated and SFAS references have been replaced with ASC references as if the SFAS has been adopted into the Codification. The adoption of the Codification had no impact on our results of operations or our financial position.

 

In May 2009, the FASB issued an accounting standard which provided guidance on accounting for and disclosing subsequent events (ASC Topic 855 — Subsequent Events, originally issued as FASB Statement No. 165, Subsequent Events). This pronouncement establishes principles and requirements for subsequent events, which are events or transactions that occur after the balance sheet date but before financial statements are issued or are available to be issued. In particular, it sets forth (a) the period after the balance sheet date during which management of a reporting entity shall evaluate events or transactions that may occur for potential recognition or disclosure in the financial statements, (b) the circumstances under which an entity shall recognize events or transactions occurring after the balance sheet date in its financial statements, and (c) the disclosures that an entity shall make about events or transactions that occurred after the balance sheet date. The pronouncement was effective for interim or annual financial periods ending after June 15, 2009. The implementation of this standard did not have a material impact on our results of operations or our financial position. We evaluated events and transactions that occurred after the balance sheet date through April 15, 2010, the date at which we issued our financial statements.

 

In December 2007, the FASB issued revised guidance on business combinations (ASC 810 — Business Combinations, originally issued as FASB Statement No. 141(Revised), Business Combinations), which revises how

business combinations are accounted for, both at the acquisition date and in subsequent periods. This pronouncement requires the acquiring entity in a business combination to (i) measure all assets acquired and liabilities assumed at their fair value at the acquisition date, (ii) recognize the full fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed in either a full or a partial acquisition, (iii) expense transaction and restructuring costs and (iv) provide additional disclosures not required under prior rules. The pronouncement applies to business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2008. Our adoption of this pronouncement did not have a significant impact on our financial position and results of operations.

 

Off Balance Sheet Arrangements

 

We do not have any “off-balance sheet arrangements” as such term is defined in Item 303 of Regulation S-K of the SEC rules.

 

Tabular Disclosure of Contractual Obligations

 

As of January 31, 2010, our contractual obligations were as follows (in thousands):

 

 

 

 

 

Impact of Inflation and Foreign Exchange

 

Our results of operations for the periods discussed have not been significantly affected by inflation or foreign currency fluctuation. We negotiate our purchase orders with foreign manufacturers in United States dollars. Thus, notwithstanding any fluctuation in foreign currencies, our cost for any purchase order is not subject to change after the time the order is placed. However, if the value of the United States dollar against local currencies were to decrease, manufacturers might increase their United States dollar prices for products.

 

We believe that inflation has not had a material effect on our costs and net revenues during the past three years.

 

Interest Rate Exposure

 

We are subject to market risk from exposure to changes in interest rates relating primarily to our line of credit. We borrow under the line of credit to support general corporate purposes, including capital expenditures and working capital needs. We do not expect changes in interest rates to have a material adverse effect on income or cash flows in fiscal 2011. Based on our average borrowings during fiscal 2010, we estimate that each 100 basis point increase in our borrowing rates would result in additional interest expense to us of approximately $850,000.

 

 

Financial statements and supplementary data required pursuant to this Item begin on page F-1 of this Report.

 

 

None.

 

 

As of January 31, 2010, our management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Exchange Act). Based on that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is (i) recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the Commission’s rules and forms and (ii) accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive and principal financial officers, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure, and thus, are effective in making known to them material information relating to G-III required to be included in this report.

 

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

 

During our last fiscal quarter, there were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

 

Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

 

Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining an adequate system of internal control over our financial reporting. In order to evaluate the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, as required by Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, management has conducted an assessment, including testing, using the criteria on Internal Control-Integrated Framework, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Our system of internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation and fair presentation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.

 

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

 

Based on its assessment, management has concluded that we maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of January 31, 2010, based on criteria in Internal Control-Integrated Framework, issued by the COSO.

 

Our independent auditors, Ernst & Young LLP, a registered public accounting firm, have audited and reported on our consolidated financial statements and the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. The reports of our independent auditors appear on pages F-2 and F-3 of this Form 10-K and express unqualified opinions on the consolidated financial statements and the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting.

 

 

None.

 

PART III

 

 

We have adopted a code of ethics and business conduct, or Code of Ethics, which applies to our principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller and persons performing similar functions. Our Code of Ethics is located on our Internet website at www.g-iii.com under the heading “About G-III.” Any amendments to, or waivers from, a provision of our Code of Ethics that apply to our principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller and persons performing similar functions will be disclosed on our internet website within five business days following such amendment or waiver. The information contained on or connected to our Internet website is not incorporated by reference into this Form 10-K and should not be considered part of this or any other report we file with or furnish to the Securities and Exchange Commission.

 

The information required by Item 401 of Regulation S-K regarding directors is contained under the heading “Proposal No. 1 — Election of Directors” in our definitive Proxy Statement (the “Proxy Statement”) relating to our Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on or about June 8, 2010, to be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and is incorporated herein by reference. For information concerning our executive officers and other significant employees, see “Business-Executive Officers of the Registrant” in Item 1 above in this Report.

 

The information required by Item 405 of Regulation S-K is contained under the heading “Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance” in our Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference. The information required by Items 407(c)(3), (d)(4), and (d)(5) of Regulation S-K is contained under the heading “Corporate Governance” in our Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference.

 

 

The information required by this Item 11 is contained under the headings “Executive Compensation” and “Compensation Committee Report” in our Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference.

 

 

Security ownership information of certain beneficial owners and management as called for by this Item 12 is incorporated by reference to the information set forth under the heading “Beneficial Ownership of Common Stock by Certain Stockholders and Management” in our Proxy Statement.

 

Equity Compensation Plan Information

 

The following table provides information as of January 31, 2010, the last day of fiscal 2010, regarding securities issued under G-III’s equity compensation plans that were in effect during fiscal 2010.

 

 

 

 

 

The information required by this Item 13 is contained under the headings “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions” and “Corporate Governance” in our Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference.

 

 

The information required by this Item 14 is contained under the heading “Principal Accounting Fees and Services” in our Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference.

 

PART IV

 

 

1. Financial Statements.

 

2. Financial Statement Schedules.

 

The Financial Statements and Financial Statement Schedules are listed in the accompanying index to consolidated financial statements beginning on page F-1 of this report. All other schedules, for which provision is made in the applicable accounting regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission are not required under the related instructions, are shown in the financial statements or are not applicable and therefore have been omitted.

 

3. Exhibits:

 

(a) The following exhibits filed as part of this report or incorporated herein by reference are management contracts or compensatory plans or arrangements: Exhibits 10.1, 10.1(a), 10.1(b), 10.7, 10.7(a), 10.8, 10.8(a), 10.9, 10.9(a), 10.9(b), 10.9(c), 10.9(d), 10.9(e), 10.10, 10.11, 10.11(a) and 10.11(b).

 

 

 

 

 

Exhibits have been included in copies of this Report filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. We will provide, without charge, a copy of these exhibits to each stockholder upon the written request of any such stockholder. All such requests should be directed to G-III Apparel Group, Ltd., 512 Seventh Avenue, 35th floor, New York, New York 10018, Attention: Mr. Wayne S. Miller, Secretary.

 

SIGNATURES

 

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

 

G-III APPAREL GROUP, LTD.

 

Morris Goldfarb,

Chief Executive Officer

 

April 15, 2010

 

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

 

 

EXHIBIT INDEX

 

G-III Apparel Group, Ltd. and Subsidiaries

 

INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULE
(Item 15(a))

 

 

All other schedules for which provision is made in the applicable regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission are not required under the related instructions or are inapplicable and, accordingly, are omitted.

 

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders

of G-III Apparel Group, Ltd.

 

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of G-III Apparel Group, Ltd. and subsidiaries as of January 31, 2010 and 2009, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended January 31, 2010. Our audits also included the financial statement schedule listed in the index at Item 15(a). These financial statements and schedule are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and schedule based on our audits.

 

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

 

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of G-III Apparel Group, Ltd. and subsidiaries at January 31, 2010 and 2009, and the consolidated results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended January 31, 2010, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Also, in our opinion, the related financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects, the information set forth therein.

 

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), G-III Apparel Group, Ltd. and subsidiaries’ internal control over financial reporting as of January 31, 2010, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated April 15, 2010 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

 

 

New York, New York

April 15, 2010

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

 

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders

of G-III Apparel Group, Ltd.

 

We have audited G-III Apparel Group Ltd. and subsidiaries internal control over financial reporting as of January 31, 2010, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (the COSO criteria). G-III Apparel Group Ltd. and subsidiaries management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

 

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

 

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

 

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

 

In our opinion, G-III Apparel Group, Ltd. and subsidiaries maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of January 31, 2010, based on the COSO criteria.

 

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of G-III Apparel Group, Ltd. and subsidiaries as of January 31, 2010 and 2009, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended January 31, 2010 of G-III Apparel Group, Ltd. and subsidiaries, and our report dated April 15, 2010 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

 

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

New York, New York

April 15, 2010

G-III Apparel Group, Ltd. and Subsidiaries

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

G-III Apparel Group, Ltd. and Subsidiaries

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

G-III Apparel Group, Ltd. and Subsidiaries

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Years ended January 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement.

G-III Apparel Group, Ltd. and Subsidiaries

 

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS