GAMCO INVESTORS, INC. ET AL - Annual Report: 2007 (Form 10-K)
UNITED
STATES
|
||||
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
|
||||
Washington,
D.C. 20549
|
||||
FORM
10-K
|
||||
|
||||
[ X ] ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
||||
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007
|
||||
or
|
||||
[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13
OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
||||
For the transition period from ______ to ______
|
||||
Commission file number 1-14761
|
||||
GAMCO Investors,
Inc.
|
||||
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its
charter)
|
||||
New York
|
|
13-4007862
|
||
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or
organization)
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
|
|||
One Corporate Center, Rye, NY
|
|
10580-1422
|
||
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
(Zip Code)
|
|||
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code (914)
921-5100
|
||||
Securities registered pursuant to Section
12(b) of the Act:
|
||||
Title of each class
|
Name of each exchange on which
registered
|
|||
Class A Common Stock, par value $0.001 per share | New York Stock Exchange, Inc. | |||
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
None
|
||||
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known
seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act Yes ¨ No x.
|
||||
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to
file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act Yes ¨ No x.
|
||||
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all
reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter
period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has
been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days Yes x No ¨.
|
||||
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers
pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and
will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in
definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in
Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K ¨.
|
||||
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a
smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large
accelerated filer", "accelerated filer", and "smaller reporting company”
in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
||||
Large accelerated filer ¨
|
Accelerated filer x | |||
Non-accelerated filer o | Smaller reporting company o | |||
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell
company (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 12b-2) Yes ¨ No x.
|
1
The aggregate market value of the class A common stock held by
non-affiliates of the registrant as of June 30, 2007 (the last business day of
the Registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter) was
$417,224,766.
As of March 1, 2008, 7,998,920 shares of Class A common
stock common stock and 20,626,644 shares of class B common stock were
outstanding. 20,428,500 shares of class B common stock were held
by GGCP, Inc.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE: The definitive proxy
statement for the 2008 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.
2
3
Forward-Looking
Information
Our disclosure and analysis in this report and in documents that are
incorporated by reference contain some forward-looking statements.
Forward-looking statements give our current expectations or forecasts of future
events. You can identify these statements because they do not relate
strictly to historical or current facts. They use words such as “anticipate,”
“estimate,” “expect,” “project,” “intend,” “plan,” “believe,” and other words
and terms of similar meaning. They also appear in any discussion of
future operating or financial performance. In particular, these include
statements relating to future actions, future performance of our products,
expenses, the outcome of any legal proceedings, and financial results.
Although we believe that we are basing our expectations and beliefs
on reasonable assumptions within the bounds of what we currently know about our
business and operations, there can be no assurance that our actual results will
not differ materially from what we expect or believe. Some of the factors that
could cause our actual results to differ from our expectations or beliefs
include, without limitation: the adverse effect from a decline in the securities
markets; a decline in the performance of our products; a general downturn in the
economy; changes in government policy or regulation; changes in our ability to
attract or retain key employees; and unforeseen costs and other effects related
to legal proceedings or investigations of governmental and self-regulatory
organizations. We also direct your attention to any more specific discussions of
risk contained in Item 1A below and in our other public filings or in documents
incorporated by reference here or in prior filings or reports.
We are providing these statements as permitted by the Private
Litigation Reform Act of 1995. We do not undertake to update publicly any
forward-looking statements if we subsequently learn that we are unlikely to
achieve our expectations or if we receive any additional information relating to
the subject matters of our forward-looking statements.
Unless we have indicated otherwise, or the context otherwise
requires, references in this report to “GAMCO Investors, Inc.,” “GBL,” “we,”
“us” and “our” or similar terms are to GAMCO Investors, Inc., its predecessors
and its subsidiaries.
GAMCO Investors, Inc. (New York Stock Exchange ("NYSE"): GBL), well
known for its Private Market Value (PMV) with a CatalystTM investment
approach, is a
widely-recognized provider of investment advisory services to mutual funds,
institutional and private wealth management investors, and investment
partnerships, principally in the United States. Through Gabelli &
Company, Inc. ("Gabelli & Company"), we provide institutional research
services to institutional clients and investment partnerships. We
generally manage assets on a discretionary basis and invest in a variety of U.S.
and international securities through various investment styles. Our
revenues are based primarily on the firm’s levels of assets under management
("AUM") and fees associated with our various investment products.
Since 1977, we have been identified with and enhanced the “value”
style approach to investing. Over the 30 years since the inception of the firm,
consistent with our fundamental objective of providing an absolute rate of
return for our clients, GBL generated over $16 billion in investment returns for
our institutional and private wealth management clients. The 30
year CARR (compounded annual rate of return) for the institutional clients (as
measured by our composite return) approached 18.6% on a gross basis and 17.7% on
a net basis, and in 2007 we produced $1.1 billion and 12.1% net return for our
institutional clients. As stated in our mission statement, our investment
objective is to earn a superior risk-adjusted return for our value clients over
the long-term through our proprietary fundamental research. In
addition to our value portfolios, we offer our clients a broad array of
investment strategies that include global, growth, international and convertible
products. We also offer a series of investment partnership
(performance fee-based) vehicles that provide a series of long-short investment
opportunities, both market and sector specific opportunities, including
offerings of non-market correlated investments in merger arbitrage, as well as
fixed income strategies.
As of December 31, 2007, we had $31.0 billion of AUM, 96% of which
were in equity products. We conduct our investment advisory business
principally through our subsidiaries: GAMCO Asset Management Inc. (Separate
Accounts), Gabelli Funds, LLC (Mutual Funds) and Gabelli Securities, Inc.
(Investment Partnerships). We also act as an underwriter, are a
distributor of our open-end mutual funds and provide institutional research
through Gabelli & Company, our broker-dealer subsidiary.
4
Our assets under management are organized into three groups:
·
|
Investment
Partnerships: we
provide advisory services to limited partnerships, offshore funds and
certain separate accounts, and also serve as a sub-advisor to certain
third-party investment funds across merger arbitrage, regional long/short
equity, and sector-focused strategies (“Investment
Partnerships”). We managed a total of $460 million in
Investment Partnership assets on December 31,
2007.
|
·
|
Separate
Accounts: we provide advisory services to a broad range of
investors, including private wealth management, corporate
pension and profit-sharing plans, foundations, endowments,
jointly-trusteed plans and municipalities, and also serve as sub-advisor
to certain other third-party investment funds including registered
investment companies (“Separate Accounts”). Each Separate
Account portfolio is managed to meet the specific needs and objectives of
the particular client by utilizing investment strategies and techniques
within our areas of expertise. On December 31, 2007, we had
$13.3 billion of Separate Account assets under
management.
|
·
|
Open
and Closed-End Funds: we provide advisory services to (i)
twenty one open-end mutual funds and nine closed-end funds under Gabelli,
GAMCO and Comstock brands; and (ii) six mutual funds within the Westwood
family of funds (collectively, the “Mutual Funds”). The Mutual
Funds had $17.2 billion of assets under management on December 31,
2007.
|
GAMCO Investors, Inc. ("GBL") is a holding company formed in
connection with our initial public offering (“Offering”) in February
1999. GGCP, Inc. owns a majority of the outstanding shares of class B
common stock of GBL, which ownership represented approximately 95% of the
combined voting power of the outstanding common stock and approximately 71% of
the equity interest on December 31, 2007. GGCP, Inc. is
majority-owned by Mr. Mario J. Gabelli (“Mr. Gabelli”) with the balance owned by
our professional staff and other individuals. Accordingly, Mr.
Gabelli could be deemed to control GBL.
Our principal executive offices are located at One Corporate Center,
Rye, New York 10580. Our telephone number is (914)
921-5100. We post or provide a link on our website, www.gabelli.com, to
the following filings as soon as reasonably practicable after they are
electronically filed with or furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
("Commission" or “SEC”): our annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on
Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and any amendments to those reports
filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934. All such filings on our website are available free of
charge.
Performance
Highlights
Separate
Accounts
The institutional client composite of our separate account business
has achieved a compound annual return of approximately 17.7% on a net basis for
over 30 years since inception through December 31, 2007. In 2007, this composite
had a net return of 12.1%. The accounts in this composite are managed in our
absolute return, research-driven PMV with a CatalystTM style since
inception.
5
The table below compares the long-term performance record for our
separate account composite since 1977, using our traditional value-oriented
product, the Gabelli PMV with a CatalystTM investment approach,
versus various benchmarks.
GAMCO
Value
1977 -
2007
GAMCO (a)
|
S&P 500 (b)
|
Russell 2000 (b)
|
CPI+10 (b)
|
|||||||||||||
Number
of Up Years
|
26 | 24 | 21 | |||||||||||||
Number
of Down Years
|
3 | 5 | 7 | |||||||||||||
Years
GAMCO Value Beat Index
|
21 | 20 | 19 | |||||||||||||
Total
Return (CAGR) (a)
|
18.6 | 12.9 | 12.8 | 14.1 | ||||||||||||
Total
Return (CAGR) net
|
17.7 | |||||||||||||||
Beta
|
0.78 |
The chart below illustrates how this methodology performed during
recent market cycles to capture the upside in positive markets while limiting
the downside in the most recent down markets.
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________
|
Footnotes to Table and
Chart
|
|
(a)
|
·
|
The Gabelli Value
composite represents fully discretionary, tax-exempt institutional
accounts managed for at least one full quarter and meeting minimum account
size requirements. The minimum size requirement for inclusion
in 1985 was $500,000; $1 million in 1986; and $5 million in 1987 and
thereafter. The performance calculations include accounts under management
during the respective periods. As of 12/31/07, the GAMCO Value composite
included 41 accounts with an aggregate market value of $4.1
billion. No two portfolios are identical. Accounts
not within this size and type may have experienced different results. Not
all accounts in the Gabelli Value Composite are included in the
composite.
|
·
|
Gabelli Value
performance results are computed on a total-return basis, which includes
all dividends, interest, and realized and unrealized gains and
losses. The summary of past performance is not intended as a
prediction of future results. Returns are presented in U.S.
dollars. All returns are before taxes and custodial fees. The
inception date of the Gabelli Value composite is
10/1/77.
|
·
|
The compound annual
growth rate from 1990 to present is net of actual fees and actual
transaction costs. The compound annual growth rate before 1990
reflects the calculation of a model investment fee (1% compounded
quarterly) and actual transaction
costs.
|
·
|
Gabelli Value Total
Return represents the total net return of the composite from 10/1/77
through 12/31/07.
|
·
|
Beta is the measure
of the Gabelli Value composite’s risk (volatility) in relation to the
S&P 500 Index.
|
|
(b)
|
·
|
The S&P 500 is
an unmanaged index of 500 U.S. stocks and performance represents total
return of the index including reinvestment of dividends. The
Russell 2000 is an unmanaged index of 2,000 small capitalization stocks
and performance represents total return of the index including
reinvestment of dividends. The performance figures for the
Russell 2000 are based on an inception date of 1/1/79. The
S&P 500 and Russell 2000 do not necessarily reflect how a managed
portfolio of equity securities would have performed. The CPI is
a widely-used measure of inflation, and the CPI+10 measure is used to show
the results that would have been achieved by obtaining a rate of return
that exceeded the CPI by a constant 10% as a basis of comparison versus
the results of the Gabelli Value
composite.
|
·
|
Up and down markets
in the chart were determined by the performance of the S&P 500 Index
during the respective periods.
|
6
-
|
GAM
GAMCO Equity Fund was awarded Standard & Poor's AAA Rating for
the fourth consecutive year and was one of only four S&P AAA
rated funds out of the 1,268 fund Mainstream Sector Group. GAM GAMCO
Equity Fund has been sub-advised by GAMCO Asset Management Inc. ("GAMCO")
for London UK based Global Asset Management (GAM), since the fund's launch
in October 1987.
|
|
Open
and Closed-End Funds
|
-
|
The Gabelli Equity
Income Fund and the Gabelli Small Cap Growth Fund both exceeded the $1.0
billion level in AUM at December 31, 2007. The
GAMCO Gold Fund reached $500 million as of December 31,
2007.
|
-
|
Our
100% US Treasury Money Market Fund¹, exceeded $1 billion as investors fled
enhanced-money market funds in favor of funds that focus on the highest
quality U.S. Treasury instruments and superior yield. The fund
ranked third in total return for the 12 months ended December 31, 2007
among 83 US Treasury money market funds tracked by Lipper Inc.², For the 5
year and 10 year periods ended December 31, 2007, the fund ranked 2nd out
of 66 funds and 3rd out of 49 funds, respectively, within that
category.
|
- | 70% of our rated Equity Assets had four or five-star ratings from Morningstar, compared to 53% within the asset management industry, according to Merrill Lynch’s December fund flows report. |
(1) Past
performance is no guarantee of future results. An investment in any money market
fund is not insured or guaranteed by the US government, the Federal Deposit
Insurance Corporation or any government agency. Although the Fund seeks to
maintain the value of an investment at $1.00 per share it is possible to lose
money by investing in the Fund. Dividend yields and returns have been enhanced
due to expense limitations initiated by the Adviser. Equity
funds involve the risk that the underlying investments may lose
value. Accordingly, it is possible to lose money by investing in
these funds. Investing in gold stocks is considered speculative and is affected
by a variety of worldwide economic, financial, and political risks. Small
capitalization companies present greater risks than securities of larger more
established companies. They trade less frequently and experience more abrupt
price movements. Investors
should consider the investment objectives, risks, sales charges and expense of
the fund carefully before investing. The prospectus contains more complete
information about this and other matters. The prospectus should be read
carefully before investing. You can obtain a prospectus by calling
Gabelli & Company, Inc. at 1-800-GABELLI (1-800-422-3554) or contacting your
financial representative or by visiting
http://www.gabelli.com.
(2)
Lipper
Inc. is a nationally-recognized independent provider of investment company
data.
7
Since our initial public offering in February 1999, GBL has generated
a 313% total return (including dividends) for its shareholders through December
31, 2007 versus a total return of 39% (including dividends) for the S&P 500
Index during the same period. Our class A common stock, which is
traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “GBL”, ended the year at
a closing market price of $69.20.
During 2007, we returned $40.2 million of our earnings to
shareholders through dividends and our stock buyback program. We paid $31.5
million, or $1.12 per share, in dividends to our common shareholders
and purchased 186,400 million shares at $8.7 million, for an
investment of $46.45 per share.
In 2007, we reported earnings of $2.79 per fully diluted share vs.
$2.49 per fully diluted share in 2006. Our net income for the
full year ended December 31, 2007 was $79.6 million versus $71.9
million in the 2006 period, and revenues were $292.4 million in 2007
compared to $261.5 million in the prior year. Our 2006 earnings
are after a charge of $0.34 per fully diluted share related to previously
disclosed discussions with the SEC. See the "Regulatory Developments"
section.
We ended 2007 with equity AUM of $29.9 billion versus $27.3 billion
on December 31, 2006. Overall, AUM were $31.0 billion on December 31,
2007 versus $28.1 billion at the end of 2006. Our equity open-end
mutual funds and closed-end funds reached AUM of $16.1 billion on December 31,
2007, an increase of approximately 13.5% from year-end 2006 of $14.2 billion, as
our open-end equity mutual funds and closed-end funds had AUM of $9.8 billion
and $6.3 billion, respectively.
8
Our
liquid balance sheet, coupled with investment grade credit ratings from both
Moody's and Standard & Poor's, provides access to financial markets and the
flexibility to opportunistically add operating resources to our firm, repurchase
our stock and consider strategic initiatives. As a result of GBL's shelf
registration in the third quarter 2006, we have the right to issue any
combination of senior and subordinate debt securities, convertible debt
securities and equity securities (including common and preferred securities) up
to a total amount of $520 million.
Our financial strength is underscored by having received an
investment grade rating from two well-respected ratings agencies, Moody’s
Investors Services and Standard and Poor’s Ratings Services. We
believe that maintaining these investment grade ratings will provide greater
access to the capital markets, enhance liquidity and lower overall borrowing
costs. However, we will also consider the use of leverage as part of our
corporate financial strategy even if it results in a lowering of our investment
rating.
On
June 30, 2006, we and Cascade Investment L.L.C. ("Cascade") agreed to amend the
terms of the $50 million convertible note issued by us (the "Note") and maturing
in August 2011, as follows: increase the coupon rate of interest to 6% from 5%
and raise the conversion price to $53 per GBL share from $52 per share, both
effective on September 15, 2006. In addition, we and Cascade agreed to extend
the exercise date for Cascade's put option until May 15, 2007. The expiration
date of the related letter of credit was extended to May 22, 2007 and a call
option was included giving us the right to redeem the Note at 101% of its
principal amount together with all accrued but unpaid interest thereon upon at
least 30 days prior written notice, subject to certain provisions. On April
18, 2007, the Company and Cascade amended the terms of the Note maturing in
August 2011, to extend the exercise date for Cascade’s put option from May 15,
2007 to December 17, 2007 and to extend the expiration date of the related
letter of credit to December 24, 2007. The put option expired on
December 17, 2007, the related letter of credit expired on December 24, 2007,
and the collateral securing the letter of credit was released and became
unrestricted Company assets as of that date. Subsequent
to year end, GBL filed a Form S-3 to register the resale of shares of GBL
by Cascade. On January 22, 2008, Cascade elected to convert $10 million of the
Note into 188,697 GBL shares. Cascade requested that the remaining $40
million face value of notes be segregated into eight notes each with a face
value of $5 million.
Our research and institutional sales team at Gabelli & Company
hosted six industry institutional investor symposiums and conferences during
2007. These institutional investor symposiums and conferences
provided an opportunity for the firm’s institutional clients to meet with the
senior management teams of leading companies and gain insight on the dynamics
within these industries. Our events in 2007 included our 31st annual Automotive
Aftermarket Symposium, our 18th annual Pump Valve &
Motor Symposium, our 13th annual Aircraft Supplier
Conference, fifth annual Dental Conference, our third annual RFID (Radio
Frequency Identification) Conference, and our second annual Water Infrastructure
conference.
Our business strategy targets global growth of the franchise through
continued leveraging of our proven asset management strengths including our
brand name, long-term performance record, diverse product offerings and
experienced investment, research and client service professionals. In
order to achieve growth in AUM and profitability, we are pursuing a strategy
which includes the following key elements:
·
|
Incentive
Fees and Fulcrum Fees. Our investment strategy is focused on
adding stock specific alpha through our proprietary Private Market Value
(PMV) with a CatalystTM
equity research efforts. We expect to receive an increasing portion
of our revenues and earnings through various products with incentive and
fulcrum fees. Since we envision that a growing percentage of
the firm's revenues will be directly linked to performance-based fees,
this will also increase the variability of our revenues and
profits. As of December 31, 2007, over $1.6 billion of separate
account assets are managed on a performance fee basis along with $1.1
billion of preferred issues of closed-end funds, the $400 million Gabelli
Global Deal Fund and $460 million of investment partnership
assets. Unlike most money management firms, we elected not to
receive a management fee on a majority of the preferred offerings in our
closed-end funds until the fund’s overall performance exceeds each
preferred’s nominal cost of capital. In addition, the incubation of
new product strategies using proprietary capital will compensate the
investment team with a performance fee model to reinforce our
pay-for-performance approach.
|
·
|
Establishing
Research and Relationship Centers. To
extend our research into new areas and add to our core research
competency, we opened two research offices in Shanghai and Singapore
supplementing our existing offices in London, New York, Chicago, Greenwich
CT, Reno, Palm Beach, and Minneapolis. We will continue to evaluate
adding additional research offices throughout the
world.
|
9
·
|
Introducing
New Products and Services. We
believe we have the capacity for development of new products and services
around the Gabelli and GAMCO brands to complement our existing product
offerings. New products since our initial public offering
include:
|
-
|
Six closed-end
funds: The Gabelli Dividend & Income Trust, Gabelli Global Deal Fund,
The Gabelli Global Utility and Income Trust, The Gabelli Global Gold,
Natural Resources & Income Trust, The Gabelli Utility Trust, and The
Gabelli Healthcare and Wellness RX
Trust.
|
-
|
Four open-end mutual
funds: Gabelli Blue Chip Value Fund (1999), Gabelli Utilities
Fund (1999) Gabelli Woodland Small Cap Value Fund (2003), and the
Gabelli SRI Fund (2007).
|
-
|
Six offshore
funds: Gabelli Global Partners, Ltd., Gabelli European
Partners, Ltd., Gabelli Japanese Value Partners, Ltd., GAMCO Performance
Partners, Ltd., Gabelli Capital Structure Arbitrage Fund Ltd., and GAMCO
SRI Partners, Ltd.
|
-
|
Eleven private
limited partnerships: Gemini Global Partners, L.P., Gabelli
Capital Structure Arbitrage Fund LP., Gabelli European Partners, L.P.,
Gabelli Intermediate Credit, L.P., Gabelli Japanese Value Partners, L.P.,
Gabelli Associates Fund II, L.P., GAMCO Performance Partners, L.P., GAMA
Select Energy Plus, L.P., GAMCO Telecom Plus, L.P. GAMCO Medical
Opportunities, L.P., and Gabelli Umbrella Fund,
L.P.
|
·
|
Promulgating
the Gabelli “Private
Market Value (PMV) with a CatalystTM”
Investment
Approach. While we have expanded our investment
product offerings, our “value investing” approach remains the core of our
business. This method is based on the value investing
principles articulated by Graham & Dodd in 1934 and further augmented
by Mario J. Gabelli, CFA with his development of Private Market Value
(PMV) with a CatalystTM and
his introduction of a catalyst into the value investment
methodology. The development of PMV analysis combined with the
concept of a catalyst has evolved into our value investing approach,
commonly referred to as Private Market Value (PMV) with a CatalystTM investing.
|
|
Private Market Value
(PMV) with a CatalystTM investing
is a disciplined, research-driven approach based on intensive security
analysis. In this process, we generally select stocks whose
intrinsic value, based on our estimate of current asset value and future
growth and earnings power, is significantly different from the value as
reflected in the public market. We then calculate the firm’s
PMV, which is defined as the price an informed industrial buyer would be
likely to pay to acquire the
business.
|
|
To limit the time
horizon in which the PMV is likely to be realized, we look for situations
in which catalyst(s) is (are) are working to help eliminate the
premium or realize the discount between the public market price and the
estimated PMV. Catalysts which are company specific
include: realization of hidden assets, recognition of
underperforming subsidiaries, share buybacks, spin-offs, mergers and
acquisitions, balance sheet changes, new products, accounting changes, new
management and cross-shareholder unwinding. Other catalysts are
related to industry dynamics or macroeconomics and include but are not
limited to: industry consolidation, deregulation, accounting, tax, pension
and political reforms, technological change and the macroeconomic
backdrop. The time horizons for catalysts to trigger change can
either be short-term, medium-term or
long-term.
|
10
|
To further extend
“value investing” and our fundamental research approach to stock
selection:
|
-
|
We established the
Gabelli Graham & Dodd, Murray, Greenwald Prize for Value Investing in
coordination with the Columbia University Graduate School of
Business. The monetary prize is awarded each year at GAMCO’s
annual client meeting to the individual who best exemplifies the goals of
refining, extending, and disseminating the practice of Value
Investing.
|
·
|
Expanding
Mutual Fund Distribution. We continue to expand
our distribution network primarily through national and regional brokerage
firms and have developed additional classes of shares for most of our
mutual funds for sale through these firms and other third-party
distribution channels on a commission basis. We intend to
increase our wholesaling efforts to market the multi-class shares, which
have been designed to meet the needs of investors who seek advice through
financial consultants.
|
·
|
Increasing
Presence in Private Wealth Management
Market. Our private wealth management
business focuses, in general, on serving clients who have established an
account relationship of $1 million or more with us. According
to industry estimates, the number of households with over $1 million in
investable assets will continue to grow in the future, subject to ups and
downs in the equity and fixed income markets. With our 31-year
history of serving this segment, long-term performance record, customized
portfolio approach, dominant, tax-sensitive, buy-hold investment strategy,
brand name recognition and broad array of product offerings, we believe
that we are well-positioned to capitalize on the growth opportunities in
this market.
|
·
|
Increasing
Marketing for Institutional Separate
Accounts. The institutional Separate Accounts
business was principally developed through direct marketing channels.
Historically, pension and financial consultants have not been a major
source of new institutional Separate Accounts business for
us. We plan to augment our institutional sales force through
the addition of staff to market directly to the consultant community as
well as our traditional marketing
channels.
|
·
|
Attracting
and Retaining Experienced Professionals. We have
increased the scope of our investment management capabilities by adding
portfolio managers and other investment personnel in order to expand our
broad array of products. The ability to attract and retain
highly-experienced investment and other professionals with a long-term
commitment to us and our clients has been, and will continue to be, a
significant factor in our long-term growth. In December 2007, we issued
385,400 restricted stock awards to our professional staff recommended by
and excluding Mr. Gabelli, which have three- and five-year vesting, and
will reward long-term commitment to our
goals.
|
·
|
Sponsorship
of Industry Conferences. Gabelli & Company, our
institutional research boutique, sponsors industry conferences and
management events throughout the year. At these conferences and events,
senior management from leading industry companies share their thoughts on
the industry, competition, regulatory issues and the challenges and
opportunities in their businesses with portfolio managers and securities
analysts.
|
11
·
|
Hosting
of Institutional Investor Symposiums. We have a
tradition of sponsoring institutional investor symposiums that bring
together prominent portfolio managers, members of academia and other
leading business professionals to present, discuss and debate current
issues and topics in the investment
industry.
|
-1997
|
“Active vs. Passive
Stock Selection”
|
-1998
|
“The Role of Hedge
Funds as a Way of Generating Absolute Returns”
|
-2001
|
“Virtues of Value
Investing”
|
-2003
|
“Dividends, Taxable
versus Non-Taxable Issues”
|
-2006
|
“Closed-End Funds:
Premiums vs. Discounts, Dividends and
Distributions”
|
We also hold annual conferences for our investment partnership
clients and prospects in New York and London at which our portfolio management
team discusses the investment environment, our strategies and portfolios, and
event-driven investment opportunities.
·
|
Capitalizing
on Acquisitions and Strategic Alliances. We
intend to selectively and opportunistically pursue acquisitions and
alliances that will broaden our product offerings and add new sources of
distribution. In November 2002, we completed our alliance with
Woodland Partners LLC, a Minneapolis based investment advisor of
institutional, high net-worth and sub-advisory accounts. On
October 1, 1999, we completed our alliance with Mathers and Company, Inc.
and now act as investment advisor to the Mathers Fund (renamed GAMCO
Mathers Fund), and in May 2000, we added Comstock Partners Funds, Inc.,
(renamed Comstock Funds, Inc.). The Mathers and Comstock funds
are part of our Non-Market Correlated mutual fund product
line.
|
We believe that we have the entrepreneurial flexibility and corporate
resumé to
pursue acquisitions and alliances.
We believe that our growth to date is traceable to the following
factors:
·
|
Strong
Industry Fundamentals: According to data compiled
by the U.S. Federal Reserve, the investment management industry has grown
faster than more traditional segments of the financial services industry,
including the banking and insurance industries. Since GBL began managing
institutional separate accounts in 1977, world equity markets have grown
at a 12.9% compounded annual growth rate through December 31, 2007 to
nearly $61 trillion(a). The
U.S. equity market comprises about $17.7 trillion(a)
or roughly 29% of world equity markets. We believe that
demographic trends and the growing role of money managers in the placement
of capital compared to the traditional role played by banks and life
insurance companies will result in continued growth of the investment
management industry.
|
·
|
Long-Term
Performance: We
have a superior long-term record of achieving relatively high returns for
our Separate Account clients. We believe that our performance record
represents a competitive advantage and a recognized component of our
franchise.
|
·
|
Stock
Market Gains: Since
we began managing institutional separate accounts in 1977, our traditional
value-oriented separate account composite has earned a compound annual
return of 17.7% net of fees versus a compound annual return of 12.8% for
the S&P
500 through December 31, 2007. Since our initial public
offering in February 1999 through December 2007, the compound annual
return for our traditional value-oriented separate account composite was
10.5% versus the S&P 500’s compound annual total return of
3.7%.
|
·
|
Widely-Recognized
“Gabelli” and “GAMCO” Brand Names: For much of
our history, our portfolio managers and investment products have been
featured in a variety of financial print media, including both U.S. and
international publications such as The
Wall
Street Journal, Financial Times, Money Magazine, Barron's, Fortune,
Business Week, Nikkei Financial News, Forbes Magazine, Consumer Reports
and Investor's
Business Daily. We also underwrite publications written by our
investment professionals, including Deals…Deals…and
More Deals which examines the practice of merger arbitrage and
Global
Convertible Investing: The Gabelli Way, a comprehensive guide to
effective investing in convertible
securities.
|
12
·
|
Diversified
Product Offerings: Since the inception of our
investment management activities, we have sought to expand the breadth of
our product offerings. We currently offer a wide spectrum of investment
products and strategies, including product offerings in U.S. equities,
U.S. fixed income, global and international equities, convertible
securities, U.S. balanced and investment
partnerships.
|
Our financial strength is underscored by having received an
investment grade rating from two well-respected ratings agencies, Moody’s
Investors Services and Standard and Poor’s Ratings Services. We
believe that maintaining these investment grade ratings will provide greater
access to the capital markets, enhance liquidity and lower overall borrowing
costs. However, we will also consider the use of leverage as part of our
corporate financial strategy even if it results in a lowering of our investment
rating.
(a)
Source: Birinyi Associates, LLC
GBL was originally founded in 1976 as an institutional
broker-dealer. We entered the separate accounts business in 1977,
management of investment partnerships in 1985 and the mutual fund business in
1986. Our initial product offerings centered on our tax sensitive,
buy-hold, value-oriented investment philosophy. Starting in the
mid-1980s, we began building on our core value-oriented equity investment
products by adding new investment strategies designed for a broad array of
clients seeking to invest in growth-oriented equities, convertible securities
and fixed income products. Since then, we have continued to build our
franchise by expanding our investment management capabilities through the
addition of industry specific, international, global, non-market correlated,
venture capital, leveraged buy-out and merchant banking product
offerings. Throughout our 30-year history, we have marketed most of
our products under the “Gabelli” and “GAMCO” brand names. Other
brands include Mathers, Comstock, Westwood and Woodland.
Our AUM are organized principally in three
groups: Separate Accounts, Mutual Funds and Investment
Partnerships.
Separate Accounts – Institutional
and Private Wealth Management: Since 1977, we have
provided investment management services through our subsidiary GAMCO to a
broad spectrum of institutional and private wealth
investors. At December 31, 2007, we had $13.3 billion of AUM in
approximately 1,700 separate accounts, representing approximately 43% of our
total AUM. We currently provide advisory services to a broad range of investors,
the majority of which (in total number of accounts) are private wealth
management client accounts – defined as individuals and their retirement
assets generally having minimum account balances of $1 million. As of
December 31, 2007, Institutional client accounts, which include corporate
pension and profit sharing plans, jointly-trusteed plans and public funds,
represented 41% of the Separate Accounts assets and 7% of the accounts.
Private wealth management accounts comprised approximately 83% of the
total number of Separate Accounts and approximately 29% of the assets as of
December 31, 2007.
Private wealth management clients are attracted to us by
our gross returns and the tax efficient nature of the underlying investment
process in these traditional products. Foundation and endowment fund
assets represented an additional 9% of the number of Separate Accounts and
approximately 10% of the assets. The sub-advisory portion of the
Separate Accounts (where we act as sub-advisor to certain other third-party
investment funds) held approximately $2.6 billion or 19% of total Separate
Account assets with less than 1% of the number of accounts.
The ten largest relationships comprised approximately 44% of our
total Separate Account AUM and approximately 24% of our total Separate Account
revenues as of and for the year ended December 31, 2007, respectively.
In general, our Separate Accounts are managed to meet the specific
needs and objectives of each client by utilizing investment strategies –
traditional “value”, “large cap value”, “large cap growth”, “global”,
“international growth” and “convertible bonds” – and techniques that are within
our areas of expertise. We distinguish between taxable and tax-free
assets and manage client portfolios with tax sensitivity within given investment
strategies.
13
At December 31, 2007, over 85% of our assets in Separate Accounts
(excluding sub-advisory assets) were obtained through direct sales
relationships. Sales efforts are conducted on a regional and product
specialist basis. Members of the sales and marketing staff for the
Separate Accounts business have an average of more than ten years of experience
with us and focus on developing and maintaining direct, long-term relationships
with their Separate Account clients. The firm will host its 23rd
Annual Client Conference in May 2008. This two-day event will kick off with a
gathering at the American Museum of Natural History in New York followed by
presentations by our portfolio managers and analysts the following
day. Along with these client seminars, we continue to establish and
staff relationship offices around the country.
We act as a sub-advisor on certain funds for several large and
well-known fund managers. Similar to corporate clients, sub-advisory
clients are also subject to business combinations which may result in the
curtailment of product distribution or the termination of the
relationship.
Investment advisory agreements for our Separate Accounts are
typically subject to termination by the client without penalty on 30 days'
notice or less.
Open and Closed-End
Funds: We provide advisory services to (a) twenty-one
open-end mutual funds and nine closed-end funds of which one open-end fund is
managed by an unaffiliated advisor; and (b) the Westwood family of funds,
consisting of six open-end mutual funds, three of which are managed on a
day-to-day basis by Westwood Management Corporation, a wholly-owned subsidiary
of Westwood Holdings Group (collectively, the "Mutual Funds"). At
December 31, 2007, we had $17.2 billion of AUM in open-end mutual funds and
closed-end funds, representing approximately 56% of our total
AUM. Our equity mutual funds and closed-end funds were $16.1 billion
in AUM on December 31, 2007, 13.5% ahead of the $14.2 billion on December 31,
2006.
During January 2006, eight open-end Mutual Funds changed their
names to GAMCO from Gabelli. The GAMCO name more appropriately
represents the various investment strategies offered to investors by Gabelli
Funds, LLC ("Funds Advisor"), including growth, gold, convertible securities and
contrarian. Funds continuing to use the Gabelli name primarily
represent value portfolios managed in the absolute return, research-driven
Private Market Value (PMV) with a CatalystTM style. This
name change has no effect on the management, the investment objective, or the
investment strategy of each fund.
The eight GAMCO branded open-end mutual funds are:
GAMCO
|
Growth
|
GAMCO
|
International
Growth
|
GAMCO
|
Gold
|
GAMCO
|
Global
Telecommunications
|
GAMCO
|
Global
Growth
|
GAMCO
|
Global
Opportunity
|
GAMCO
|
Global Convertible
Securities
|
GAMCO
|
Mathers
|
The Gabelli brand continues to represent our “Value” business,
primarily representing our absolute return, research-driven Private Market Value
(PMV) with a CatalystTM funds including the
GAMCO Westwood Mighty MitesSM micro-cap value fund,
GAMCO Westwood SmallCap Equity Fund, GAMCO Westwood Income Fund and the
Global Telecommunications Fund, which are value portfolio but retains the
GAMCO Global series name. The Gabelli brand also includes The Gabelli Blue Chip
Value Fund and The Gabelli Woodland Small Cap Growth Fund as well as all of the
closed-end funds.
The GAMCO brand encompasses a panoply of portfolios. It is the
brand for our “Growth” business, which is primarily represented by The GAMCO
Growth Fund, The GAMCO Global Growth Fund, and The GAMCO International Growth
Fund. GAMCO also includes other distinct investment strategies and
styles including our gold, convertible securities and contrarian funds.
14
Open-end
Funds
On December 31, 2007, we had $10.9 billion of AUM in twenty seven
open-end mutual funds. At year-end, of the AUM in open-end mutual funds having
an overall rating from Morningstar, Inc. ("Morningstar") 81% were ranked "three
stars" or better, with approximately 70% ranked "five stars" or "four stars" on
an overall basis (i.e.,
derived from a weighted average of the performance figures associated with its
three-, five-, and ten-year Morningstar Rating metrics). There can be
no assurance, however, that these funds will be able to maintain such ratings or
that past performance will be indicative of future results.
At December 31, 2007, approximately 33% of our AUM in open-end,
equity mutual funds had been obtained through direct sales relationships. We
also sell our open-end mutual funds through Third-Party Distribution Programs,
particularly No-Transaction Fee (“NTF”) Programs, and have developed additional
classes of shares for many of our mutual funds for sale through additional
third-party distribution channels on a commission basis. At December
31, 2007, Third Party Distribution Programs accounted for approximately 67% of
all assets in open-end funds.
In June
2007, The Gabelli SRI Fund was launched. This is an open-end fund
that will invest according to the Fund's stated socially responsible
guidelines.
Closed-end
Funds
We act as
investment advisor to nine closed-end funds, seven of which trade on the NYSE:
Gabelli Equity Trust (GAB), Gabelli Global Deal Fund (GDL), Gabelli Global
Multimedia Trust (GGT), The Gabelli
Healthcare & Wellness Rx Trust (GRX), Gabelli Convertible and Income Securities
Fund (GCV), Gabelli Utility Trust (GUT) and Gabelli Dividend & Income Trust
(GDV) and two that trade on the American Stock Exchange (“AMEX”): Gabelli Global
Utility & Income Trust (GLU) and Gabelli Global Gold, Natural Resources
& Income Trust (GGN). As of December 31, 2007, the nine Gabelli closed-end
funds had total assets of $6.3 billion, representing 36.8% of the total assets
in our Mutual Funds business.
The Gabelli Equity Trust, which raised $400 million through its
initial public offering in August 1986, finished its 21st year with net assets of
$2.0 billion. In September 2005, the Equity Trust completed its first
acquisition of the assets of another closed-end investment company, Sterling
Capital Corporation, with total assets of $18.3 million. In October
2005, the Equity Trust completed a heavily over-subscribed rights offering,
retaining gross proceeds of $143.7 million. Since inception, the
Equity Trust has distributed $1.953 billion in cash to common shareholders
through its 10% Distribution Policy and has spun off three other closed-end
funds, the Gabelli Global Multimedia Trust, the Gabelli Utility Trust and the
Gabelli Health Care and Wellness Rx Trust
. In 2006, the Equity Trust also received net proceeds of $144.8
million of assets attributable to the 6.20% Series F Preferred Stock.
The Gabelli Dividend & Income Trust, launched in November
2003, raised $196.6 million in net proceeds through its placement of Series D
and Series E Preferred Shares in November 2005. The Gabelli Dividend
& Income Trust, which invests primarily in dividend-paying equity
securities, had a total annualized return of 12.2% since inception and net
assets of $2.5 billion as of December 31, 2007.
The Gabelli Global Gold, Natural Resources & Income Trust
raised gross proceeds of $332 million through its initial public offering in
March 2005 and $20 million through the exercise of the underwriters’
overallotment option in May 2005. The Gabelli Global Gold, Natural
Resources & Income Trust, which invests primarily in equity securities of
gold and natural resources companies and utilizes a covered call option writing
program to generate current income, had a total annualized return of 26.2% since
inception and net assets of $634 million as of December 31, 2007.
In January 2007, we launched the Gabelli Global Deal Fund (NYSE:
GDL), a closed-end fund which will seek to achieve its investment objective by
investing primarily in announced merger and acquisition transactions and, to a
lesser extent, in corporate reorganizations involving stubs, spin-offs and
liquidations. In May
2007, the shareholders of the Gabelli Equity Trust approved the spin-off of the
Gabelli Healthcare & WellnessRx
Trust (NYSE: GRX), our ninth closed-end fund.
A detailed description of our Mutual Funds is provided within this Item 1 beginning on page 18.
15
Investment
Partnerships: We manage Investment Partnerships through
our 92% majority-owned subsidiary, Gabelli Securities, Inc. ("GSI"). The
Investment Partnerships consist primarily of limited partnerships, offshore
funds, separate accounts and sub-advisory relationships within the following
investment strategies: merger arbitrage, event-driven long/short equity funds,
sector-focused funds and merchant banking. We had $460 million of Investment
Partnership AUM.
We introduced our first investment partnership, a merger arbitrage
partnership, in 1985. An offshore version of this strategy was added
in 1989. Building on our strengths in global event-driven value
investing, several new Investment Partnerships have been added to balance
investors’ geographic, strategy and sector needs. Today we offer a
broad range of absolute return products. Within our merger arbitrage strategy,
we manage approximately $362 million of assets for investors who seek positive
returns not correlated to fluctuations of the general market. These funds seek
to drive returns by investing in announced merger and acquisition transactions
that are primarily dependent on deal closure and less on the overall market
environment. In event-driven strategies, we manage $40 million of
assets focused on the U.S., Japanese, and European markets. We also
manage a series of sector-focused absolute return funds designed to offer
investors a mechanism to diversify their portfolios by global economic sector
rather than by geographic region. We currently offer four
sector-focused portfolios: the Gabelli International Gold Fund Ltd., GAMA Select
Energy Plus, L.P., GAMCO Telecom +, L.P., and GAMCO Medical Opportunities,
L.P. Merchant banking activities are carried out through ALCE
Partners, L.P. and Gabelli Multimedia Partners, L.P., both of which are closed
to new investors. In 2006, in response to SEC registration proposals, GSI
registered as an investment advisor for all of the investment
partnerships.
Our Investment Partnerships have been marketed primarily by our
direct sales force to private wealth clients and
institutions. We intend to expand product offerings, both domestic
and international, and the geographic composition of our customer base in
Investment Partnerships. It is our expectation that the assets
invested in these products will provide a growing source of revenues in the
future.
16
The following table sets forth total AUM by product type as of the
dates shown and their compound annual growth rates ("CAGR"):
Assets Under Management
By Product Type
(Dollars in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
January
1,
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
2003 to
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
December
31,
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|
At December
31,
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|
2003
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
CAGR(a)
|
|
|
|
2007 /
06
|
|
||||||
Equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Mutual
Funds
|
|
$
|
11,618
|
|
|
$
|
12,371
|
|
|
$
|
12,963
|
|
|
$
|
14,195
|
|
|
$
|
16,115
|
|
|
|
14.8
|
%
|
|
|
13.5
|
%
|
Institutional
& Private Wealth Management
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Direct
|
|
|
9,106
|
|
|
|
9,881
|
|
|
|
9,550
|
|
|
|
10,282
|
|
|
|
10,708
|
|
|
|
7.7
|
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
Sub-advisory
|
|
|
3,925
|
|
|
|
3,706
|
|
|
|
2,832
|
|
|
|
2,340
|
|
|
|
2,584
|
|
|
|
(0.2
|
) |
|
|
10.4
|
|
Total
Equity
|
|
|
24,649
|
|
|
|
25,958
|
|
|
|
25,345
|
|
|
|
26,817
|
|
|
|
29,407
|
|
|
|
10.2
|
|
|
9.7
|
|
|
Fixed
Income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Money
Market Mutual Funds
|
|
|
1,703
|
|
|
|
1,488
|
|
|
|
724
|
|
|
|
734
|
|
|
|
1,112
|
|
|
|
(10.7
|
) |
|
|
50.8
|
|
Bond
Mutual Funds
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
(4.7
|
) |
|
|
-
|
|
Institutional
& Private Wealth Management
|
|
|
504
|
|
|
|
388
|
|
|
|
84
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
(47.7
|
) |
|
|
(52.0
|
) |
Total
Fixed Income
|
|
|
2,218
|
|
|
|
1,887
|
|
|
|
819
|
|
|
|
794
|
|
|
|
1,146
|
|
|
|
(15.0
|
) |
|
|
44.3
|
|
Investment
Partnerships:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Investment
Partnerships
|
|
|
692
|
|
|
|
814
|
|
|
|
634
|
|
|
|
491
|
|
|
|
460
|
|
|
|
(4.5
|
) |
|
|
(6.3
|
) |
Total Assets Under
Management
|
|
$
|
27,559
|
|
|
$
|
28,659
|
|
|
$
|
26,798
|
|
|
$
|
28,102
|
|
|
$
|
31,013
|
|
|
|
7.9
|
|
|
10.4
|
||
Breakdown of Total Assets Under Management: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mutual
Funds
|
|
$
|
13,332
|
|
|
$
|
13,870
|
|
|
$
|
13,698
|
|
|
$
|
14,939
|
|
|
$
|
17,237
|
|
|
|
11.4
|
|
|
15.4
|
||
Institutional
& Private Wealth Management
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Direct
|
|
|
9,610
|
|
|
|
10,269
|
|
|
|
9,634
|
|
|
|
10,332
|
|
|
|
10,732
|
|
|
|
6.1
|
|
|
3.9
|
||
Sub-advisory
|
|
|
3,925
|
|
|
|
3,706
|
|
|
|
2,832
|
|
|
|
2,340
|
|
|
|
2,584
|
|
|
|
(0.2
|
) |
|
|
10.4
|
|
Investment
Partnerships
|
|
|
692
|
|
|
|
814
|
|
|
|
634
|
|
|
|
491
|
|
|
|
460
|
|
|
|
(4.5
|
) |
|
|
(6.3
|
) |
Total Assets Under
Management
|
|
$
|
27,559
|
|
|
$
|
28,659
|
|
|
$
|
26,798
|
|
|
$
|
28,102
|
|
|
$
|
31,013
|
|
|
|
7.9
|
|
|
10.4
|
|
(a) Compound annual growth rate.
Summary of
Investment Products
We manage assets in the following wide spectrum of investment
products and strategies, many of which are focused on fast-growing areas:
U.S.
Equities:
|
Global
and International Equities:
|
Investment
Partnerships:
|
All
Cap Value
|
International
Growth
|
Merger
Arbitrage
|
Large Cap
Value
|
Global
Growth
|
U.S.
Long/Short
|
Large Cap
Growth
|
Global
Value
|
Global
Long/Short
|
Mid
Cap Value
|
Global
Telecommunications
|
European
Arbitrage
|
Small Cap
Value
|
Global
Multimedia
|
Japanese
Long/Short
|
Small Cap
Growth
|
Gold
|
Sector-Focused
|
Micro
Cap
|
-
Energy
|
|
Natural
Resources
|
U.S.
Fixed Income:
|
-
Global Telecom
|
Real
Estate
|
Corporate
|
-
Gold
|
Utilities
|
Government
|
-
Medical Opportunities
|
Non-Market
Correlated
|
Municipals
|
Merchant
Banking
|
Options
Income
|
Asset-backed
|
|
Intermediate
|
||
Convertible
Securities:
|
Short-term
|
U.S.
Balanced:
|
U.S. Convertible
Securities
|
Balanced
Growth
|
|
Global Convertible
Securities
|
Balanced
Value
|
17
In 2007, we continued to develop the skills of our investment team by
allocating firm capital to incubate investment strategies. This began with a
capital structure arbitrage strategy (2004) and now includes a merger-arbitrage,
a global trading strategy as well as investment accounts for a designated group
of analysts.
Additional
Information on Mutual Funds
The Mutual Funds include twenty-seven open-end mutual funds and nine
closed-end funds which had total assets as of December 31, 2007 of $17.2
billion. The open-end Mutual Funds are available to individuals and institutions
on both a no-load and commission basis, while the closed-end funds are listed
and traded on either the NYSE or the AMEX. At December 31, 2007, the
open-end funds had total net assets of $10.9 billion and the closed-end
funds had total net assets of $6.3 billion. The assets managed in the closed-end
funds represent approximately 37% of the assets in the Mutual Funds group and
20% of the total AUM at December 31, 2007. Our AUM consist of a broad range of
U.S. and international stock, bond and money market mutual funds that meet the
varied needs and objectives of our Mutual Fund shareholders. At December 31,
2007, approximately 33% of our AUM in open-end Mutual Funds had been obtained
through direct sales relationships.
Through our affiliates, we act as advisor to all of the Mutual Funds,
except with respect to the Gabelli Capital Asset Fund for which we act as a
sub-advisor and Guardian Investment Services Corporation, an unaffiliated
company, acts as manager. As sub-advisor, we make day-to-day investment
decisions for the $229 million Gabelli Capital Asset Fund.
Funds Advisor, a wholly-owned subsidiary of GBL, acts as the
investment advisor for all of the Mutual Funds other than the Westwood family of
funds.
Teton Advisors, Inc. ("Teton", formerly Gabelli Advisers, Inc. until
January 24, 2008), a subsidiary controlled by GBL, acts as investment advisor to
the Westwood family of funds and has retained Westwood Management Corporation, a
NYSE listed company (NYSE: WHG), to act as sub-advisor for three of the six
portfolios. The GAMCO Westwood Mighty MitesSM Fund, launched in May
1998, along with the GAMCO Westwood Smallcap Equity Fund and GAMCO Westwood
Income Fund, are advised solely by Teton, using a team investment approach.
Westwood Management Corporation owns an approximately 19.0% equity interest in
Teton.
18
The following table lists the Mutual Funds, together with the
December 31, 2007 Morningstar overall rating, where rated (ratings are not
available for the money-market mutual funds and other mutual funds, which
collectively represent 27.4% of the AUM in the Mutual Funds), provides a
description of the primary investment objective, fund characteristics, fees, the
date that the mutual fund was initially offered to investors and the AUM in the
mutual funds as of December 31, 2007.
Net
Assets as of
|
|||||||
December 31,
|
|||||||
Fund
|
Advisory
|
12b-1
|
Initial
|
2007
|
|||
(Morningstar
Overall
|
Primary Investment
|
Fund
|
Fees
|
Fees
|
Offer
|
(all
classes)
|
|
Rating) (1)
|
Objective
|
Characteristics
|
(%)
|
(%)
|
Date
|
($ in
millions)
|
|
OPEN-END
FUNDS:
|
|||||||
EQUITY
INCOME:
|
|||||||
The Gabelli Equity
|
High level of total return
|
Class AAA:
|
1.00
|
.25
|
01/02/92
|
$1,263
|
|
Income Fund
|
with an emphasis on
|
No-load,
|
|||||
«««««
|
income-producing equities
|
Open-end,
|
|||||
with yields greater than
|
Diversified
|
||||||
the S&P 500 average.
|
Multi-class Shares (2)
|
||||||
GAMCO Westwood
|
Both capital appreciation
|
Class AAA:
|
.75
|
.25
|
10/01/91
|
$157
|
|
Balanced Fund
|
and current income using
|
No-load,
|
|||||
««««
|
portfolios containing stocks,
|
Open-end,
|
|||||
bonds, and cash as appropriate
|
Diversified
|
||||||
in light of current economic
|
Multi-class shares (2)
|
||||||
and business conditions.
|
|||||||
GAMCO Westwood
|
High level of current income
|
Class AAA:
|
1.00 (9)
|
.25
|
09/30/97
|
$12
|
|
Income Fund
|
as well as long-term capital
|
No-load,
|
|||||
««««
|
appreciation by investing
|
Open-end,
|
|||||
primarily in income producing
|
Diversified
|
||||||
equity and fixed income
|
Multi-class shares (2)
|
||||||
securities.
|
|||||||
VALUE:
|
|||||||
GAMCO Westwood
|
Capital appreciation through a
|
Class AAA:
|
1.00
|
.25
|
01/02/87
|
$194
|
|
Equity Fund
|
diversified portfolio of equity
|
No-load,
|
|||||
«««««
|
securities using bottom-up
|
Open-end,
|
|||||
fundamental research with a
|
Diversified
|
||||||
focus on identifying
|
Multi-class shares (2)
|
||||||
well-seasoned companies.
|
|||||||
The Gabelli Asset | Growth of capital as a primary | Class AAA: |
1.00
|
.25
|
03/03/86
|
$2,973
|
|
Fund | investment objective, with |
No-load,
|
|||||
«««« | current income as a secondary |
Open-end,
|
|||||
investment objective. Invests in
|
Diversified
|
||||||
equity securities of companies |
Multi-class shares (2)
|
||||||
selling at a significant discount | |||||||
to their private market value. | |||||||
The Gabelli Blue Chip
|
Capital appreciation through
|
Class AAA:
|
1.00
|
.25
|
08/26/99
|
$32
|
|
Value Fund
|
investments in equity securities
|
No-load,
|
|||||
««««
|
of established companies, which
|
Open-end,
|
|||||
are temporarily out of favor and
|
Diversified
|
||||||
which have market capitalizations
|
Multi-class shares (2)
|
||||||
in excess of $5 billion.
|
|||||||
SMALL CAP
VALUE:
|
|||||||
The Gabelli Small Cap
|
High level of capital appreciation
|
Class AAA:
|
1.00
|
.25
|
10/22/91
|
$1,048
|
|
Growth Fund
|
from equity securities of smaller
|
No-load,
|
|||||
««««
|
companies with market
|
Open-end,
|
|||||
capitalization of $2 billion or less
|
Diversified
|
||||||
at the time of purchase.
|
Multi-class Shares (2)
|
||||||
19
Net Assets
as of
|
||||||||
December
31,
|
||||||||
Fund
|
Advisory
|
12b-1
|
Initial
|
2007
|
||||
(Morningstar
Overall
|
Primary Investment
|
Fund
|
Fees
|
Fees
|
Offer
|
(all
classes)
|
||
Rating) (1)
|
Objective
|
Characteristics
|
(%)
|
(%)
|
Date
|
($ in
millions)
|
||
The Gabelli Woodland
|
Long Term capital appreciation
|
Class AAA:
|
1.00 (9)
|
.25
|
12/31/02
|
$9
|
||
Small Cap Value Fund
|
investing at least 80% of its
|
No-load,
|
||||||
««
|
in equity securities of
|
Open-end,
|
||||||
companies with market
|
Non-diversified
|
|||||||
capitalizations less than
|
Multi-class shares (2)
|
|||||||
the greater of $3.0 billion
|
||||||||
or the largest company
|
||||||||
in the Russell 2000 Index.
|
||||||||
GAMCO Westwood
|
Long-term capital
|
Class AAA:
|
1.00 (9)
|
.25
|
04/15/97
|
$10
|
||
SmallCap Equity Fund
|
appreciation, investing
|
No-load,
|
||||||
««
|
at least 80% of its assets
|
Open-end,
|
||||||
|
in equity securities of
|
Diversified
|
||||||
companies with market
|
Multi-class shares (2)
|
|||||||
capitalizations of $2.5 billion
|
||||||||
or less at the time of purchase.
|
||||||||
FOCUSED
VALUE:
|
||||||||
The Gabelli Value
|
High level of capital
|
Class A:
|
1.00
|
.25
|
09/29/89
|
$827
|
||
Fund
|
appreciation from
|
Front end-load,
|
||||||
««
|
undervalued equity
|
Open-end
|
||||||
securities that are
|
Non-diversified
|
|||||||
held in a concentrated
|
Multi-class shares (2)
|
|||||||
portfolio.
|
||||||||
GROWTH:
|
||||||||
The GAMCO Growth
|
Capital appreciation from
|
Class AAA:
|
1.00
|
.25
|
04/10/87
|
$949
|
||
Fund
|
companies that have
|
No-load,
|
||||||
««««
|
favorable, yet undervalued,
|
Open-end,
|
||||||
prospects for earnings
|
Diversified
|
|||||||
growth. Invests in equity
|
Multi-class Shares (2)
|
|||||||
securities of companies
|
||||||||
that have above-average
|
||||||||
or expanding market
|
||||||||
shares and profit margins.
|
||||||||
GAMCO International |
Capital appreciation
|
Class AAA:
|
1.00
|
.25
|
06/30/95
|
$58
|
||
Growth Fund |
by investing primarily
|
No-load,
|
||||||
«« |
in equity securities of
|
Open-end,
|
||||||
foreign companies with
|
Diversified
|
|||||||
rapid growth in revenues
|
Multi-class shares (2)
|
|||||||
and earnings.
|
||||||||
AGGRESSIVE
GROWTH:
|
||||||||
The GAMCO Global
|
High level of capital
|
Class AAA:
|
1.00
|
.25
|
02/07/94
|
$107
|
||
Growth Fund
|
appreciation through
|
No load,
|
||||||
«««
|
investment in a
|
Open-end,
|
||||||
portfolio of equity
|
Non-diversified
|
|||||||
securities focused on
|
Multi-class shares (2)
|
|||||||
companies involved
|
||||||||
in the global marketplace.
|
||||||||
MICRO-CAP:
|
||||||||
GAMCO Westwood
|
Long-term capital appreciation
|
Class AAA:
|
1.00
|
.25
|
05/11/98
|
$57 | ||
Mighty MitesSM Fund
|
by investing primarily
|
No load,
|
||||||
««««
|
In equity securities with
|
Open-end,
|
||||||
Market capitalization
|
Diversified
|
|||||||
of $300 million or less
|
Multi-class shares (2)
|
|||||||
at the time of purchase.
|
20
Net Assets
as of
|
|||||||||
December
31,
|
|||||||||
Fund
|
Advisory
|
12b-1
|
Initial
|
2007
|
|||||
(Morningstar
Overall
|
Primary Investment
|
Fund
|
Fees
|
Fees
|
Offer
|
(all
classes)
|
|||
Rating) (1)
|
Objective
|
Characteristics
|
(%)
|
(%)
|
Date
|
($ in
millions)
|
|||
SPECIALTY
EQUITY:
|
|||||||||
The GAMCO Global
|
High level of capital
|
Class AAA:
|
1.00 (9)
|
.25
|
05/11/98
|
$23
|
|||
Opportunity Fund
|
appreciation through
|
No-load,
|
|||||||
«««
|
worldwide investments
|
Open-end,
|
|||||||
in equity securities.
|
Non-diversified
|
||||||||
Multi-class shares (2)
|
|||||||||
The GAMCO Global
|
High level of total return
|
Class AAA:
|
1.00 (9)
|
.25
|
02/03/94
|
$10
|
|||
Convertible
|
through a combination of
|
No-load,
|
|||||||
Securities Fund
|
current income and capital
|
Open-end,
|
|||||||
«««
|
Appreciation through
|
Non-diversified
|
|||||||
investment in convertible
|
Multi-class shares (2)
|
||||||||
securities of U.S. and
|
|||||||||
non-U.S. issuers.
|
|||||||||
The Gabelli Capital Asset
|
Capital appreciation from
|
No-load,
|
.75
|
n/a
|
05/01/95
|
$229
|
|||
Fund
|
equity securities of companies
|
Open-end,
|
|||||||
(not rated) (8)
|
selling at a significant
|
Diversified,
|
|||||||
discount to their private
|
Variable Annuity
|
||||||||
market value.
|
|||||||||
The Gabelli SRI Fund | Capital appreciation from | Class A |
1.00
(9)
|
.25
|
6/1/07 |
$2
|
|||
(not rated) (8) | equity securities of companies |
No-load,
|
|||||||
the fund deems to be | Open-end, | ||||||||
socially responsible. | Diversified, | ||||||||
Multi-class shares (2) | |||||||||
SECTOR:
|
|||||||||
GAMCO Gold | Seeks capital |
Class AAA:
|
1.00
|
.25
|
07/11/94
|
$510
|
|||
Fund | appreciation and |
No-load,
|
|||||||
««« | employs a value |
Open-end,
|
|||||||
approach to investing |
Diversified
|
||||||||
primarily in equity |
Multi-class shares (2)
|
||||||||
securities of gold- | |||||||||
related companies | |||||||||
worldwide. | |||||||||
The GAMCO Global |
High level of capital
|
Class AAA:
|
1.00
|
.25
|
11/01/93
|
$313
|
|||
Telecommunications |
appreciation through
|
No-load,
|
|||||||
Fund |
worldwide investments
|
Open-end,
|
|||||||
««« |
in equity securities,
|
Non-diversified
|
|||||||
including the U.S.,
|
Multi-class shares (2)
|
||||||||
primarily in the
|
|||||||||
telecommunications
|
|||||||||
industry.
|
|||||||||
The Gabelli Utilities
|
High level of total return through
|
Class AAA:
|
1.00
|
.25
|
08/31/99
|
$739
|
|||
Fund
|
a combination of capital
|
No-load,
|
|||||||
«
|
appreciation and current income
|
Open-end,
|
|||||||
from investments in utility
|
Diversified
|
||||||||
companies.
|
Multi-class shares (2)
|
||||||||
ABSOLUTE RETURN: | |||||||||
The Gabelli ABC Fund | Total returns that are | No-load, |
.50
(7)
|
n/a
(7)
|
5/14/93
|
$183
|
|||
attractive to investors | Open-end, | ||||||||
««
|
in various market conditions | Non-diversified | |||||||
without excessive risk of | |||||||||
capital loss, utilizing certain | |||||||||
arbitrage strategies and | |||||||||
investing in value orientated | |||||||||
common stocks at a significant | |||||||||
discount to their PMV. |
21
Net Assets
as of
|
||||||
December
31,
|
||||||
Fund
|
Advisory
|
12b-1
|
Initial
|
2007
|
||
(Morningstar
Overall
|
Primary Investment
|
Fund
|
Fees
|
Fees
|
Offer
|
(all
classes)
|
Rating)
(1)
|
Objective
|
Characteristics
|
(%)
|
(%)
|
Date
|
($ in
millions)
|
CONTRARIAN:
|
||||||
Comstock
|
Capital appreciation and current
|
Class A
|
1.00
|
.25
|
10/10/85
|
$38
|
Capital Value Fund
|
income through investment in a
|
Load,
|
||||
(not rated) (8)
|
highly diversified portfolio of
|
Open-end,
|
||||
securities.
|
Diversified
|
|||||
Multi-class shares (2)
|
||||||
Comstock
|
Capital appreciation and current
|
Class A
|
.85
|
.25
|
05/26/88
|
$5
|
Strategy Fund
|
income through investment in a
|
Load,
|
||||
(not rated) (8)
|
portfolio of debt securities.
|
Open-end,
|
||||
Non-Diversified
|
||||||
Multi-class shares (2)
|
||||||
GAMCO Mathers
|
Long-term capital appreciation
|
Class AAA:
|
1.00
|
.25
|
8/19/65
|
$26
|
Fund
|
in various market conditions
|
No-load,
|
||||
«
|
without excess risk of capital loss.
|
Open-end,
|
||||
Diversified
|
FIXED
INCOME:
|
||||||||
GAMCO Westwood
|
Total return and current
|
Class AAA:
|
.60 (9)
|
.25
|
10/01/91
|
$10
|
||
Intermediate Bond
|
income, while limiting
|
No-load,
|
||||||
Fund
|
risk to principal. Pursues
|
Open-end,
|
||||||
««
|
higher yields than shorter
|
Diversified
|
||||||
maturity funds and has
|
Multi-class shares (2)
|
|||||||
more price stability than
|
||||||||
generally higher yielding
|
||||||||
long-term funds.
|
||||||||
CASH
MANAGEMENT-MONEY MARKET:
|
||||||||
The Gabelli U.S. Treasury
|
High current income
|
Money Market,
|
.30 (9)
|
n/a
|
10/01/92
|
$1,111
|
||
Money Market Fund
|
with preservation of
|
Open-end,
|
||||||
(11)
|
principal and
|
Diversified
|
||||||
liquidity, while
|
||||||||
striving to keep
|
||||||||
expenses among the
|
||||||||
lowest of all U.S.
|
||||||||
Treasury money market
|
||||||||
funds.
|
||||||||
22
Net Assets
as of
|
||||||||
December
31,
|
||||||||
Fund
|
Advisory
|
12b-1
|
Initial
|
2007
|
||||
(Morningstar
Overall
|
Primary Investment
|
Fund
|
Fees
|
Fees
|
Offer
|
(all
classes)
|
||
Rating)
(1)
|
Objective
|
Characteristics
|
(%)
|
(%)
|
Date
|
($ in
millions)
|
||
CLOSED-END
FUNDS:
|
||||||||
The Gabelli Equity
|
Long-term growth of
|
Closed-end,
|
1.00 (10)
|
n/a
|
08/14/86
|
$1,990
|
||
Trust Inc.
|
capital by investing
|
Non-diversified
|
||||||
(not rated) (8)
|
in equity securities.
|
NYSE Symbol: GAB
|
||||||
The Gabelli
|
High total return
|
Closed-end,
|
1.00 (10)
|
n/a
|
07/03/89
|
$149
|
||
Convertible and Income
|
from investing
|
diversified
|
||||||
Securities Fund Inc. (4)
|
primarily in
|
NYSE Symbol: GCV
|
||||||
«««
|
convertible
|
|||||||
instruments.
|
||||||||
The Gabelli Global
|
Long-term capital
|
Closed-end,
|
1.00 (10)
|
n/a
|
11/15/94
|
$251
|
||
Multimedia Trust Inc. (3)
|
appreciation from
|
Non-diversified
|
||||||
(not rated) (8)
|
equity investments in
|
NYSE Symbol: GGT
|
||||||
global telecommunications,
|
||||||||
media, publishing and
|
||||||||
entertainment holdings.
|
||||||||
The Gabelli
|
High total return from
|
Closed-end,
|
1.00 (10)
|
n/a
|
07/09/99
|
$300
|
||
Utility Trust (5)
|
investments primarily in
|
Non-diversified
|
||||||
«««
|
securities of companies
|
NYSE Symbol: GUT
|
||||||
involved in gas, electricity
|
||||||||
and water industries.
|
||||||||
The Gabelli
|
Qualified dividend income
|
Closed-end,
|
1.00 (10)
|
n/a
|
11/24/03
|
$2,476
|
||
Dividend & Income
|
and capital appreciation
|
Non-diversified
|
||||||
Trust
|
potential.
|
NYSE Symbol: GDV
|
||||||
««««
|
||||||||
The Gabelli
|
A consistent level of after-tax
|
Closed-end,
|
1.00
|
n/a
|
5/28/04
|
$78
|
||
Global Utility & Income
|
total return with an emphasis
|
Non-diversified
|
||||||
Trust
|
on tax-advantaged dividend
|
AMEX Symbol: GLU
|
||||||
«««
|
income.
|
|||||||
The Gabelli
|
High level of current income
|
Closed-end,
|
1.00
|
n/a
|
3/29/05
|
$634
|
||
Global Gold, Natural
|
through an option writing strategy
|
Non-diversified
|
||||||
Resources
& Income Trust
|
on
equity securities owned in the
|
AMEX
Symbol: GGN
|
||||||
(not
rated) (8)
|
gold
and natural resources
|
|||||||
industries.
|
||||||||
The Gabelli Global Deal Fund | Achieve absolute return through | Closed-end, |
0.50
|
n/a
|
1/26/07
|
$394
|
||
in various market conditions | Non-diversified | |||||||
without excessive risk of | NYSE Symbol: GDL | |||||||
capital. | ||||||||
The Gabelli Healthcare | Seeks long-term growth of | Closed-end, |
1.00
|
n/a
|
6/28/07
|
$68
|
||
and Wellness Rx Fund (6) | capital within the health and | Non-diversified | ||||||
wellness industries. | NYSE Symbol: GRX | |||||||
23
(1)
|
Morningstar
RatingTM
as of December 31, 2007. For each fund with at least a three-year history,
Morningstar calculates a Morningstar RatingTM
based on a Morningstar risk-adjusted return measure that accounts for
variation in a fund’s monthly performance (including the effects of sales
charges, loads and redemption fees) placing more emphasis on downward
variations and rewarding consistent performance. The top 10% of
the funds in an investment category receive five stars, the next 22.5%
receive four stars, the next 35% receive three stars, the next 22.5%
receive two stars and the bottom 10% receive one star. The
Overall Morningstar Rating for a fund is derived from a weighted average
of the performance figures associated with its three, five, and ten-year
(if applicable) Morningstar Rating metrics. Morningstar Ratings
are shown for the respective class shown; other classes may have different
performance characteristics. There were 378 Conservative
Allocation funds rated for three years, 232 funds for five years and 110
funds for ten years (GAMCO Mathers Fund). There were 413
Mid-Cap Blend funds rated for three years, 329 funds for five years and
140 funds for ten years (The Gabelli Asset Fund, The Gabelli ABC Fund, The
Gabelli Value Fund). There were 1,132 Large Value funds rated
for three years, 902 funds for five years and 413 funds for ten years (The
Gabelli Blue Chip Value Fund, GAMCO GAMCO
Westwood Equity Fund, The Gabelli Equity Income
Fund). There were 69 Convertibles funds rated for three years,
60 funds for five years and 47 funds for ten years (The GAMCO Global
Convertible Securities Fund). There were 432 World Stock funds
rated for three years, 380 funds for five years and 184 funds for ten
years (The GAMCO Global Growth Fund, The GAMCO Global Opportunity
Fund). There were 42 Specialty-Communications funds rated for
three years, 40 funds for five years and 12 funds for ten years (The GAMCO
Global Telecommunications Fund). There were 59
Specialty-Precious Metals funds rated for three years, 53 funds for five
years and 28 funds for ten years (GAMCO Gold
Fund).
|
There were 1,420 Large Growth funds rated for three years, 1,196
funds for five years and 552 funds for ten years (The GAMCO Growth
Fund). There were 169 Foreign Large Growth funds rated for three
years, 153 funds for five years and 67 funds for ten years (GAMCO International
Growth Fund). There were 332 Small Value funds rated for three years,
254 funds for five years and 91 funds for ten years (The Gabelli Small Cap
Growth Fund, GAMCO Westwood Mighty MitesSM Fund, Gabelli Woodland
Small Cap Value Fund). There were 93 Specialty-Utilities funds rated
for three years, 77 funds rated for five years and 54 funds for ten years (The
Gabelli Utilities Fund). There were 871 Moderate Allocation funds
rated for three years, 685 funds for five years and 393 funds for ten years
(GAMCO Westwood Balanced Fund). There were 953 Intermediate-Term Bond
funds rated for three years, 812 funds for five years and 408 funds for ten
years (GAMCO Westwood Intermediate Bond Fund). There were 262
Specialty-Real Estate funds rated for three years and 187 funds for five years
and 78 funds for ten years (GAMCO Westwood Income Fund). There
were 502 Small Blend funds rated for three years and 395 funds for five years
and 160 funds for ten years (GAMCO Westwood SmallCap Equity Fund, The Gabelli
Woodland Small Cap Value Fund). (a) 2007 Morningstar, Inc. All Rights
reserved. This information is (1) proprietary to Morningstar and/or
its content providers (2) may not be copied or distributed; and (3) is not
warranted to be accurate, complete or timely. Neither Morningstar nor
its content providers are responsible for any damages or losses arising from any
use of this information. Past performance is no guarantee of future
results.
(2)
|
These funds have
multi-classes of shares available. Multi-class shares include
Class A shares which have a front-end sales charge, Class B shares which
are subject to a back-end contingent deferred sales charge for up to 6
years and Class C which shares are subject to a 1% back-end
contingent deferred sales charge for up to two years. However,
Class B shares are no longer offered for new purchases as of July 2004.
Comstock Strategy Fund Class R shares, which are no-load, are available
only for retirement and certain institutional
accounts. Comstock Strategy Fund class O shares are no longer
offered to the public. Class I shares are available to
institutional accounts. Net assets include all share
classes.
|
(3)
|
The Gabelli Global
Multimedia Trust Inc. was formed in 1994 through a spin-off of assets from
The Gabelli Equity Trust.
|
(4)
|
The Gabelli
Convertible and Income Securities Fund Inc. was originally formed in 1989
as an open-end investment company and was converted to a closed-end
investment company in March 1995.
|
(5)
|
The Gabelli Utility
Trust was formed in 1999 through a spin-off of assets from The Gabelli
Equity Trust.
|
(6) | The Gabelli Healthcare and WellnessRX Trust was formed in 2007 through a spin-off of assets from The Gabelli Equity Trust. |
(7)
|
Funds Advisor has
reduced the Advisory fee from 1.00% to 0.50% since April 1,
2002. Gabelli & Company waived receipt of the 12b-1 Plan
distribution fees as of January 1, 2003, and on February 25, 2004, the
Fund’s Board of Directors agreed with the Funds Advisor’s request to
terminate the 12b-1 Plan. The advisory fee was contractually set at 0.50%
as of May 1, 2007.
|
(8)
|
Certain funds are
not rated because they do not have a three-year history, or there are not
enough similar funds in the category determined by
Morningstar.
|
(9)
|
Funds Advisor has an
agreement in place to waive its advisory fee or reimburse expenses of the
Fund to maintain fund expenses at a specified level for Class AAA shares;
multi-class shares have separate limits as described in the Fund’s
prospectus. (The Gabelli Woodland Small Cap Value Fund – 2.00%;
GAMCO Westwood Income Fund – 1.50%; The GAMCO Global Opportunity Fund –
2.00%; The GAMCO Global Convertible Securities Fund – 2.00%; The Gabelli
SRI Fund - 2.00%; GAMCO Westwood SmallCap Equity Fund – 1.50%; GAMCO
Westwood Intermediate Bond Fund – 1.00%; The Gabelli U.S. Treasury Money
Market Fund –0.08% through September 30, 2007. Such agreements
are renewable annually).
|
(10)
|
Funds Advisor has
agreed to reduce its advisory fee on the liquidation value of preferred
stock outstanding if certain performance levels are not
met.
|
(11)
|
The Gabelli U.S.
Treasury Money Market Fund ranked in the top tier in total return for the
12 months ended December 31, 2007 among 83 US Treasury money market funds
tracked by Lipper Inc. For the 5 year and 10 year periods ended December
31, 2007, the fund ranked 2nd out of 66 funds and 3rd out of 49 funds,
respectively, within that category. Investment returns and yield will
fluctuate. An investment in a money market fund is not guaranteed by the
United States government nor insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance
Corporation or any government agency. Although the Fund seeks to preserve
the value of an investment at $1.00 per share, it is possible to lose
money by investing on the Fund.
|
24
Shareholders of the open-end Funds are allowed to exchange shares
among the same class of shares of the other open-end funds as economic and
market conditions and investor needs change at no additional
cost. However, as noted below, certain Mutual Funds impose a 2%
redemption fee on shares redeemed in seven days or less after a purchase. We
periodically introduce new mutual funds designed to complement and expand our
investment product offerings, respond to competitive developments in the
financial marketplace and meet the changing needs of investors.
On December 30, 2004, the shareholders of The Gabelli ABC Fund voted
to approve a charter amendment that would require investment accounts held at
the fund's transfer agent, State Street Bank & Trust Company, be directly
registered to the beneficial owners of the fund. The action, which
was recommended by Funds Advisor and approved by the fund’s Board of Directors,
permits the redemption of shares held through certain brokers and financial
consultants in omnibus and individual accounts where the beneficial owner is not
disclosed.
Our marketing efforts for the Mutual Funds are currently focused on
increasing the distribution and sales of our existing funds as well as creating
new products for sale through our distribution channels. We believe that our
marketing efforts for the Mutual Funds will continue to generate additional
revenues from investment advisory fees. We have traditionally distributed most
of our open-end Mutual Funds by using a variety of direct response marketing
techniques, including telemarketing and advertising, and as a result we maintain
direct relationships with many of our no-load open-end Mutual Fund customers.
Beginning in late 1995, we expanded our product distribution by offering several
of our open-end Mutual Funds through Third-Party Distribution Programs,
including NTF Programs. In 1998 and 1999, we further expanded these efforts to
include substantially all of our open-end Mutual Funds in Third-Party
Distribution Programs. More than 33% of the AUM in the open-end Mutual Funds are
still attributable to our direct response marketing efforts. Third-Party
Distribution Programs have become an increasingly important source of asset
growth for us. Of the $9.8 billion of AUM in the open-end equity
Mutual Funds as of December 31, 2007, approximately 67% were generated through
Third-Party Distribution Programs. We are responsible for paying the
service and distribution fees charged by many of the Third-Party Distribution
Programs, although a portion of such service fees under certain circumstances
are payable by the funds. Several bills have been introduced in
Congress that would amend the Investment Company Act. These
proposals, which include but are not limited to the elimination or restriction
of Rule 12b-1 distribution fees, if enacted or adopted, could have a substantial
impact on the regulation and operation of our registered funds. In
light of such legislation and efforts by some of the program sponsors to
increase fees beyond what we deem to be acceptable, several of our Mutual Funds
may be withdrawn from such programs. During 2000, we completed
development of additional classes of shares for many of our mutual funds for
sale through national brokerage and investment firms and other third-party
distribution channels on a commission basis. The multi-class shares
are available in all of the Gabelli mutual funds, except for the Gabelli
Capital Asset Fund and the GAMCO Mathers Fund. The use of multi-class
share products will expand the distribution of Gabelli Fund products into the
advised sector of the mutual fund investment community. During 2003,
we introduced Class I shares, which are no load shares with higher minimum
initial investment and without distribution fees available to Institutional and
Retirement Plan Accounts held directly through Gabelli & Company. The
no-load shares are designated as Class AAA shares and are available for new and
current investors. Effective February 15, 2007, Class AAA shares of
the GAMCO Growth Fund, GAMCO International Growth Fund, and GAMCO Global Growth
Fund are only available to existing Gabelli Fund Shareholders who established
accounts prior to February 15, 2007. In general, distribution through
Third-Party Distribution Programs has greater variable cost components and lower
fixed cost components than distribution through our traditional direct sales
methods.
We provide investment advisory and management services pursuant to an
investment management agreement with each Mutual Fund. The investment management
agreements with the Mutual Funds generally provide that we are responsible for
the overall investment and administrative services, subject to the oversight of
each Mutual Fund's Board of Directors or Trustees and in accordance with each
Mutual Fund's fundamental investment objectives and policies. The investment
management agreements permit us to enter into separate agreements for
administrative and accounting services on behalf of the respective Mutual
Funds.
25
We provide the Mutual Funds with administrative services pursuant to
the management contracts. Such services include, without limitation,
supervision of the calculation of net asset value, preparation of financial
reports for shareholders of the Mutual Funds, internal accounting, tax
accounting and reporting, regulatory filings and other services. Most of these
administrative services are provided through sub-contracts with unaffiliated
third parties. Transfer agency and custodial services are provided directly to
the Mutual Funds by unaffiliated third parties.
Our Mutual Fund investment management agreements may continue in
effect from year to year only if specifically approved at least annually by (i)
the Mutual Fund's Board of Directors or Trustees or (ii) the Mutual Fund's
shareholders and, in either case, the vote of a majority of the Mutual Fund's
directors or trustees who are not parties to the agreement or "interested
persons" of any such party, within the meaning of the Investment Company Act of
1940 as amended (the “Investment Company Act”). Each Mutual Fund may terminate
its investment management agreement at any time upon 60 days' written notice by
(i) a vote of the majority of the Board of Directors or Trustees cast in person
at a meeting called for the purpose of voting on such termination or (ii) a vote
at a meeting of shareholders of the lesser of either 67% of the voting shares
represented in person or by proxy or 50% of the outstanding voting shares of
such Mutual Fund. Each investment management agreement automatically terminates
in the event of its assignment, as defined in the Investment Company
Act. We may terminate an investment management agreement without
penalty on 60 days' written notice.
Gabelli & Company, the wholly-owned subsidiary of our 92%
majority-owned subsidiary GSI, is a broker-dealer registered under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and is regulated by the Financial Industry
Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”). Gabelli & Company's revenues are
derived primarily from the distribution of our Mutual Funds, brokerage
commissions, underwriting fees and selling concessions.
Mutual Fund
Distribution
Gabelli & Company distributes our open-end Mutual Funds pursuant
to distribution agreements with each Mutual Fund. Under each distribution
agreement with an open-end Mutual Fund, Gabelli & Company offers and sells
such open-end Mutual Fund's shares on a continuous basis and pays all of the
costs of marketing and selling the shares, including printing and mailing
prospectuses and sales literature, advertising and maintaining sales and
customer service personnel and sales and services fulfillment systems, and
payments to the sponsors of Third-Party Distribution Programs, financial
intermediaries and Gabelli & Company sales personnel. Gabelli
& Company receives fees for such services pursuant to distribution plans
adopted under provisions of Rule 12b-1 (“12b-1”) of the Investment Company Act.
Distribution fees from the open-end mutual funds are computed daily based on
average net assets and are accrued monthly. Distribution fees from the open-end
Mutual Funds amounted to $19.4 million, $20.6 million and $25.0 million for the
years ended December 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007, respectively. Gabelli &
Company is the principal underwriter for funds distributed in multiple classes
of shares which carry either a front-end or back-end sales
charge. Underwriting fees and sales charges retained amounted to
$646,000, $859,000 and $938,000 for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2006 and
2007, respectively.
Under the distribution plans, the open-end Class AAA shares of the
Mutual Funds (except The Gabelli US Treasury Money Market Fund, Gabelli Capital
Asset Fund and The Gabelli ABC Fund) and the Class A shares of various funds pay
Gabelli & Company a distribution or service fee of .25% per year (except the
Class A shares of the GAMCO Westwood Funds which pay .50% per year and GAMCO
Westwood Intermediate Bond Fund which pay 0.35% per year) on the average daily
net assets of the fund. Class B and Class C shares have a 12b-1 distribution
plan with a service and distribution fee totaling 1%. Gabelli &
Company’s distribution agreements with the Mutual Funds may continue in effect
from year to year only if specifically approved at least annually by (i) the
Mutual Fund's Board of Directors or Trustees or (ii) the Mutual Fund's
shareholders and, in either case, the vote of a majority of the Mutual Fund's
directors or trustees who are not parties to the agreement or "interested
persons" of any such party, within the meaning of the Investment Company Act.
Each Mutual Fund may terminate its distribution agreement, or any agreement
thereunder, at any time upon 60 days' written notice by (i) a vote of the
majority of its directors or trustees cast in person at a meeting called for the
purpose of voting on such termination or (ii) a vote at a meeting of
shareholders of the lesser of either 67% of the voting shares represented in
person or by proxy or 50% of the outstanding voting shares of such Mutual Fund.
Each distribution agreement automatically terminates in the event of its
assignment, as defined in the Investment Company Act. Gabelli &
Company may terminate a distribution agreement without penalty upon 60 days'
written notice.
26
Gabelli & Company also offers our open-end mutual fund products
through our website, www.gabelli.com,
where directly registered mutual fund investors can access their personal
account information and buy, sell and exchange Fund shares. Fund
prospectuses, quarterly reports, fund applications, daily net asset values and
performance charts are all available online. As part of our efforts
to educate investors, we introduced Gabelli University with our initial
publications Deals, Deals… and
More Deals and Global
Convertible Investing: The Gabelli Way. Our website is an
active, informative and valuable resource which we believe has become an
increasingly important feature of our client service efforts.
Institutional
Research
Gabelli & Company provides institutional investors with
investment ideas on numerous industries and special situations, with a
particular focus on small-cap and mid-cap companies. Our team of
sell-side analysts follow economic sectors on a global basis. Our
research focuses on company fundamentals, cash flow statistics, and catalysts
that will help realize returns.
Brokerage Commissions and
Trading
Gabelli & Company generates brokerage commission revenues from
securities transactions executed on an agency basis on behalf of institutional
and private wealth management clients as well as from retail customers
and mutual funds. Commission revenues totaled $12.2 million, $12.6
million, and $15.7 million for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007,
respectively. Gabelli & Company has considered and continues to explore
expansion of its proprietary trading activities.
Underwriting
Gabelli & Company is involved in external syndicated underwriting
activities. In 2005, 2006 and 2007, Gabelli & Company
participated syndicated underwritings of public equity and debt offerings
managed by major investment banks. In 2005, Gabelli & Company participated
in 4 of these underwritings with commitments of $21.4 million, of which 2
included a commitment of $5.9 million for participation in offerings of Gabelli
closed-end funds shares. In 2006, Gabelli & Company participated in 4 of
these underwritings with commitments of $15.5 million, of which 1 included
a commitment of $14.0 million for participation in offerings of Gabelli
closed-end funds shares. In 2007, Gabelli & Company participated in 5
of these underwritings with commitments of $7.0 million, of which 2 included a
commitment of $42.5 million for participation in offerings of Gabelli closed-end
funds shares.
We compete with other investment management firms and mutual fund
companies, insurance companies, banks, brokerage firms and other financial
institutions that offer products that have similar features and investment
objectives to those offered by us. Many of the investment management
firms with which we compete are subsidiaries of large diversified financial
companies and many others are much larger in terms of AUM and revenues and,
accordingly, have much larger sales organizations and marketing
budgets. Historically, we have competed primarily on the basis of the
long-term investment performance of many of our investment
products. However, we have taken steps to increase our distribution
channels, brand name awareness and marketing efforts.
The market for providing investment management services to
institutional and private wealth management separate accounts is also
highly competitive. Approximately 35% of our investment advisory fee revenue for
the year ended December 31, 2007 was derived from our Separate
Accounts. Selection of investment advisors by U.S. institutional
investors is often subject to a screening process and to favorable
recommendations by investment industry consultants. Many of these
investors require their investment advisors to have a successful and sustained
performance record, often five years or longer, and also focus on one-year and
three-year performance records. We have significantly increased our
AUM on behalf of U.S. institutional investors since our entry into the
institutional asset management business in 1977. At the current time, we believe
that our investment performance record would be attractive to potential new
institutional and private wealth
management clients. However, no assurance can be given that our
efforts to obtain new business will be successful.
27
Service marks and brand name recognition are important to our
business. We have rights to the service marks under which our products are
offered. We have registered certain service marks in the United
States and will continue to do so as new trademarks and service marks are
developed or acquired. We have rights to use the “Gabelli” name, the
“GAMCO” name, and other names. Pursuant to an assignment agreement,
Mr. Gabelli has assigned to us all of his rights, title and interests in and to
the “Gabelli” name for use in connection with investment management services,
mutual funds and securities brokerage services. However, under the agreement,
Mr. Gabelli will retain any and all rights, title and interests he has or may
have in the “Gabelli” name for use in connection with (i) charitable foundations
controlled by Mr. Gabelli or members of his family or (ii) entities engaged in
private investment activities for Mr. Gabelli or members of his family. In
addition, the funds managed by Mr. Gabelli outside GBL have entered into a
license agreement with us permitting them to continue limited use of the
“Gabelli” name under specified circumstances. We have taken, and will continue
to take, action to protect our interests in these service marks.
Virtually all aspects of our businesses are subject to various
federal and state laws and regulations. These laws and regulations are primarily
intended to protect investment advisory clients and shareholders of registered
investment companies. Under such laws and regulations, agencies that regulate
investment advisors and broker-dealers such as us have broad administrative
powers, including the power to limit, restrict or prohibit such an advisor or
broker-dealer from carrying on its business in the event that it fails to comply
with such laws and regulations. In such event, the possible sanctions that may
be imposed include the suspension of individual employees, limitations on
engaging in certain lines of business for specified periods of time, revocation
of investment advisor and other registrations, censures, and fines. We believe
that we are in substantial compliance with all material laws and
regulations.
Our business is subject to regulation at both the federal and state
level by the SEC and other regulatory bodies. Certain of our subsidiaries are
registered with the Commission under the Investment Advisers Act, and the Mutual
Funds are registered with the Commission under the Investment Company Act. We
also have a subsidiary that is registered as a broker-dealer with the Commission
and is subject to regulation by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority
("FINRA") and various states.
The subsidiaries of GBL that are registered with the Commission under
the Investment Advisers Act (Funds Advisor, Teton, Gabelli Fixed Income LLC,
GAMCO and GSI) are regulated by and subject to examination by the
Commission. The Investment Advisers Act imposes numerous obligations on
registered investment advisors including fiduciary duties, record keeping
requirements, operational requirements, marketing requirements and disclosure
obligations. The Commission is authorized to institute proceedings and impose
sanctions for violations of the Investment Advisers Act, ranging from censure to
termination of an investment advisor's registration. The failure of a subsidiary
to comply with the requirements of the Commission could have a material adverse
effect on us. We believe that we are in substantial compliance with
the requirements of the regulations under the Investment Advisers Act.
We derive a substantial majority of our revenues from investment
advisory services through our investment management agreements. Under the
Investment Advisers Act, our investment management agreements terminate
automatically if assigned without the client's consent. Under the Investment
Company Act, advisory agreements with registered investment companies such as
the Mutual Funds terminate automatically upon assignment. The term "assignment"
is broadly defined and includes direct assignments as well as assignments that
may be deemed to occur, under certain circumstances, upon the transfer, directly
or indirectly, of a controlling interest in GBL.
In its capacity as a broker-dealer, Gabelli & Company is required
to maintain certain minimum net capital and cash reserves for the benefit of our
customers. Gabelli & Company’s net capital, as defined, has consistently met
or exceeded all minimum requirements. Gabelli & Company is also
subject to periodic examination by FINRA.
Subsidiaries of GBL are subject to the Employee Retirement Income
Security Act of 1974, as amended (“ERISA”), and to regulations promulgated there
under, insofar as they are “fiduciaries” under ERISA with respect to certain of
their clients. ERISA and applicable provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of
1986, as amended (the “Code”), impose certain duties on persons who are
fiduciaries under ERISA and prohibit certain transactions involving ERISA plan
clients. Our failure to comply with these requirements could have a material
adverse effect on us.
28
Investments by GBL on behalf of our clients often represent a
significant equity ownership position in an issuer's class of stock. As of
December 31, 2007, we had five percent or more beneficial ownership with respect
to approximately 100 equity securities. This activity raises frequent regulatory
and legal issues regarding our aggregate beneficial ownership level with respect
to portfolio securities, including issues relating to issuers' shareholder
rights plans or “poison pills,” state gaming laws and regulations, federal
communications laws and regulations, public utility holding company laws and
regulations, federal proxy rules governing shareholder communications and
federal laws and regulations regarding the reporting of beneficial ownership
positions. Our failure to comply with these requirements could have a
material adverse effect on us.
The USA Patriot Act of 2001, enacted in response to the terrorist
attacks on September 11, 2001, contains anti-money laundering and financial
transparency laws and mandates the implementation of various new regulations
applicable to broker-dealers, mutual funds and other financial services
companies, including standards for verifying client identification at account
opening, and obligations to monitor client transactions and report suspicious
activities. Anti-money laundering laws outside of the U.S. contain
some similar provisions. Our failure to comply with these
requirements could have a material adverse effect on us.
We and certain of our affiliates are subject to the laws of non-U.S.
jurisdictions and non-U.S. regulatory agencies or bodies. In particular, we are
subject to requirements in numerous jurisdictions regarding reporting of
beneficial ownership positions in securities issued by companies whose
securities are publicly-traded in those countries. In addition, GAMCO is
registered as an international advisor, investment counsel and portfolio manager
with the Ontario Securities Commission in Canada in order to market our services
to prospective clients who reside in Ontario. Several of our
Investment Partnerships are organized under the laws of foreign jurisdictions.
In connection with our opening of an office in London and our plans to market
certain products in Europe, we are required to comply with the laws of the
United Kingdom and other European countries regarding these
activities. Our subsidiary, GAMCO Asset Management (UK) Limited, is
regulated by the Financial Services Authority. In connection with our
registration in the United Kingdom, we have minimum capital requirements that
have been consistently met or exceeded. In 2007, we opened research offices in
Shanghai and Singapore and therefore are subject to national and local
laws in those jurisdictions.
Regulatory
matters
On
September 3, 2003, the New York Attorney General’s office (“NYAG”) announced
that it had found evidence of widespread improper trading involving mutual fund
shares. These transactions included the “late trading” of mutual fund
shares after the 4:00 p.m. pricing cutoff and “time zone arbitrage” of mutual
fund shares designed to exploit pricing inefficiencies. Since the
NYAG’s announcement, FINRA, the SEC, the NYAG and officials of other states have
been conducting inquiries into and bringing enforcement actions related to
trading abuses in mutual fund shares. We received information
requests and subpoenas from the SEC and the NYAG in connection with their
inquiries and have complied with these requests for documents and testimony. We
implemented additional compliance policies and procedures in response to recent
industry initiatives and an internal review of our mutual fund practices and
procedures in a variety of areas. A special committee of all of our
independent directors was also formed to review various issues involving mutual
fund share transactions and was assisted by independent
counsel.
As part
of our review, hundreds of documents were examined and approximately fifteen
individuals were interviewed. The Company has found no evidence that
any employee participated in or facilitated any “late trading”. The
Company also has found no evidence of any improper trading in our mutual funds
by our investment professionals or senior executives. As the Company
previously reported, we did find that in August of 2002, we banned an account,
which had been engaging in frequent trading in our Global Growth Fund (the
prospectus of which did not impose limits on frequent trading) and which had
made a small investment in one of our hedge funds, from further transactions
with our firm. Certain other investors had been banned prior to
that. The Company also found that certain discussions took place in
2002 and 2003 between GBL’s staff and personnel of an investment advisor
regarding possible frequent trading in certain Gabelli domestic equity
funds. In June 2006, we began discussions with the SEC staff for a
potential resolution of their inquiry. As a result of these discussions
the
Company increased its reserve (“SEC reserve”) from an initial $1 million in
2003 to $16 million in 2006. In February 2007, the Company made an
offer of settlement to the SEC staff for communication to the Commission for its
consideration to resolve this matter. This offer of settlement is subject
to final agreement regarding the specific language of the SEC’s administrative
order and other settlement documents. Should an offer of
settlement with the SEC be agreed upon, it is contemplated that management will
engage a consultant to determine an appropriate distribution of disgorgement
proceeds to affected mutual fund shareholders. Since these discussions are
ongoing, the Company cannot determine at this time whether they will ultimately
result in a settlement of this matter, whether our reserves will be sufficient
to cover any payments by the Company related to such a settlement, or whether
and to what extent insurance may cover such payments.
29
In
September 2005, we were informed by the staff of the SEC that they may recommend
to the Commission that one of our advisory subsidiaries be held accountable for
the actions of two of the seven closed-end funds then managed by the subsidiary
relating to Section 19(a) and Rule 19a-1 of the Investment Company Act of
1940. These provisions require registered investment companies to
provide written statements to shareholders when a dividend is made from a source
other than net investment income. While the funds sent annual
statements containing the required information and Form 1099-Div statements as
required by the IRS, the funds did not send written statements to shareholders
with each distribution in 2002 and 2003. The staff indicated that
they may recommend to the Commission that administrative remedies be sought,
including a monetary penalty. The closed-end funds changed their notification
procedures, and we believe that all of the funds have been in compliance since
2004.
In
response to industry-wide inquiries and enforcement actions, a number of
regulatory and legislative initiatives were introduced. The SEC has
proposed and adopted a number of rules under the Investment Company Act and the
Investment Advisers Act and is currently studying potential major revisions of
other rules. The SEC adopted rules requiring written compliance
programs for registered investment advisers and registered investment companies
and additional disclosures regarding portfolio management and advisory contract
renewals. In addition, several bills were introduced in a prior
Congress that, if adopted, would have amended the Investment Company
Act. These proposals, if reintroduced and enacted, or if adopted by
the SEC, could have a substantial impact on the regulation and operation of our
registered and unregistered funds. For example, certain of these
proposals would, among other things, limit or eliminate Rule 12b-1 distribution
fees, limit or prohibit third party soft dollar arrangements and restrict the
management of hedge funds and mutual funds by the same portfolio manager.
The
investment management industry is likely to continue facing a high level of
regulatory scrutiny and become subject to additional rules designed to increase
disclosure, tighten controls and reduce potential conflicts of
interest. In addition, the SEC has substantially increased its use of
focused inquiries in which it requests information from a number of fund
complexes regarding particular practices or provisions of the securities
laws. We participate in some of these inquiries in the normal course
of our business. The SEC
periodically proposes and adopts how rules or rule changes under the Investment
Company Act and the Investment Advisers Act and is currently studying potential
major revisions of various rules including those govering the financing of
mutual fund distribution activities. Changes in laws,
regulations and administrative practices by regulatory authorities, and the
associated compliance costs, have increased our cost structure and could in the
future have a material impact.
On February 28, 2008, we had a full-time staff of 214 individuals, of
whom 67 served in the portfolio management, research and trading areas
(including 24 portfolio managers for the Mutual Funds, Separate Accounts
and Investment Partnerships), 71 served in the marketing and shareholder
servicing areas and 76 served in the administrative area.
30
Business
Risks
We caution the reader that the following business risks and those
risks described elsewhere in this report and in our other SEC filings could
cause our actual results to differ materially from expectations stated in our
forward-looking statements.
Risks Related to Our
Industry
Changes in laws or
regulations or in governmental policies could limit the sources and amounts of
our revenues, increase our costs of doing business, decrease our profitability
and materially and adversely affect our business.
Our business is subject to extensive regulation in the United States,
primarily at the federal level, including regulation by the SEC under the
Investment Company Act and the Investment Advisers Act, by the Department of
Labor under ERISA, as well as regulation by FINRA and state regulators. The
mutual funds managed by Fund Advisor and Teton are registered
with the SEC as investment companies under the Investment Company Act. The
Investment Advisers Act imposes numerous obligations on investment advisors,
including record-keeping, advertising and operating requirements, disclosure
obligations and prohibitions on fraudulent activities. The Investment Company
Act imposes similar obligations, as well as additional detailed operational
requirements, on registered investment companies and investment advisors. Our
failure to comply with applicable laws or regulations could result in fines,
censure, suspensions of personnel or other sanctions, including revocation of
our registration as an investment advisor or broker-dealer. Industry regulations
are designed to protect our clients and investors in our funds and other third
parties who deal with us and to ensure the integrity of the financial markets.
They are not designed to protect our stockholders. Changes in laws or
regulations or in governmental policies could limit the sources and amounts of
our revenues, increase our costs of doing business, decrease our profitability
and materially and adversely affect our business.
To the extent we
are forced to compete on the basis of price, we may not be able to maintain our
current fee structure.
The investment management business is highly competitive and has
relatively low barriers to entry. To the extent we are forced to compete on the
basis of price, we may not be able to maintain our current fee structure.
Although our investment management fees vary from product to product,
historically we have competed primarily on the performance of our products and
not on the level of our investment management fees relative to those of our
competitors. In recent years, however, there has been a trend toward lower fees
in the investment management industry. In order to maintain our fee structure in
a competitive environment, we must be able to continue to provide clients with
investment returns and service that make investors willing to pay our fees. In
addition, the board of directors of each mutual fund managed by Funds
Advisor and Teton must make certain findings as to the reasonableness of
its fees. We cannot be assured that we will succeed in providing investment
returns and service that will allow us to maintain our current fee structure.
Fee reductions on existing or future new business could have an adverse effect
on our profit margins and results of operations.
We derive a
substantial portion of our revenues from contracts that may be terminated on
short notice.
A substantial majority of all of our revenues are derived from
investment management agreements and distribution
arrangements. Investment management agreements and distribution
arrangements with the Mutual Funds are terminable without penalty on 60 days'
notice (subject to certain additional procedural requirements in the case of
termination by a Mutual Fund) and must be specifically approved at least
annually, as required by law. Such annual renewal requires, among
other things, approval by the disinterested members of each Mutual Fund's board
of directors or trustees. Investment advisory agreements with the
Separate Accounts are typically terminable by the client without penalty on 30
days' notice or less. Any failure to renew or termination of a
significant number of these agreements or arrangements would have a material
adverse effect on us.
31
Investors in the
open-end funds can redeem their investments in these funds at any time without
prior notice, which could adversely affect our earnings.
Open-end fund investors may redeem their investments in those funds
at any time without prior notice. Investors may reduce the aggregate amount of
AUM for any number of reasons, including investment performance, changes in
prevailing interest rates and financial market performance. In a declining stock
market, the pace of mutual fund redemptions could accelerate. Poor performance
relative to other asset management firms tends to result in decreased purchases
of mutual fund shares and increased redemptions of mutual fund shares. The
redemption of investments in mutual funds managed by Funds Advisor or Teton
would adversely affect our revenues, which are substantially dependent upon
the AUM in our funds. If redemptions of investments in mutual funds
caused our revenues to decline, it could have a material adverse effect on our
earnings.
Certain changes in
control of our company would automatically terminate our investment management
agreements with our clients, unless our separate account clients consent and, in
the case of fund clients, the funds’ boards of directors and shareholders vote
to continue the agreements, and could prevent us for a two-year period from
increasing the investment advisory fees we are able to charge our mutual fund
clients.
Under the Investment Company Act, an investment management agreement
with a fund must provide for its automatic termination in the event of its
assignment. The fund’s board and shareholders must vote to continue the
agreement following its assignment, the cost of which ordinarily would be borne
by us.
Under the Investment Advisers Act, a client’s investment management
agreement may not be “assigned” by the investment advisor without the client’s
consent. An investment management agreement is considered under both acts to be
assigned to another party when a controlling block of the advisor’s securities
is transferred. In our case, an assignment of our investment management
agreements may occur if, among other things, we sell or issue a certain number
of additional common shares in the future. We cannot be certain that our clients
will consent to assignments of our investment management agreements or approve
new agreements with us if an assignment occurs. Under the Investment Company
Act, if a fund’s investment advisor engages in a transaction that results in the
assignment of its investment management agreement with the fund, the advisor may
not impose an “unfair burden” on that fund as a result of the transaction for a
two-year period after the transaction is completed. The term “unfair burden” has
been interpreted to include certain increases in investment advisory fees. This
restriction may discourage potential purchasers from acquiring a controlling
interest in our company.
Regulatory
developments designed to increase oversight of hedge funds may adversely affect
our business.
The SEC has proposed a rule that would limit the eligibility of
individuals to invest in hedge funds by requiring that such individuals own not
less than $2.5 million in investments at the time of their hedge fund
investment. The SEC may also propose or enact other rules designed to increase
oversight of hedge funds by the SEC. Any regulations applicable to hedge funds
that may be adopted could have an impact on our operations and may adversely
affect our hedge fund business and decrease our future income.
A decline in the
prices of securities would lead to a decline in our assets under management,
revenues and earnings.
Substantially all of our revenues are determined by the amount of our
AUM. Under our investment advisory contracts with our clients, the investment
advisory fees we receive are typically based on the market value of AUM. In
addition, we receive asset-based distribution and/or service fees with respect
to the open-end funds managed by Funds Advisor or Teton over time pursuant to
distribution plans adopted under provisions of Rule 12b-1 under the
Investment Company Act. Rule 12b-1 fees typically are based on the market
value of AUM and represented approximately 8.6% of our revenues for the year
ended December 31, 2007 and 7.7% and 7.9% of our revenues for the years
ended December 31, 2005 and 2006, respectively. Accordingly, a decline in
the prices of securities generally may cause our revenues and net income to
decline by either causing the value of our AUM to decrease, which would result
in lower investment advisory and Rule 12b-1 fees, or causing our clients to
withdraw funds in favor of investments they perceive to offer greater
opportunity or lower risk, which would also result in lower fees. The securities
markets are highly volatile, and securities prices may increase or decrease for
many reasons, including economic and political events and acts of terrorism
beyond our control. If a decline in securities prices caused our revenues to
decline, it could have a material adverse effect on our earnings.
32
Catastrophic and
unpredictable events could have a material adverse effect on our
business.
A terrorist attack, war, power failure, cyber-attack, natural
disaster or other catastrophic or unpredictable event could adversely affect our
future revenues, expenses and earnings by: interrupting our normal business
operations; sustaining employee casualties, including loss of our key
executives; requiring substantial expenditures and expenses to repair, replace
and restore normal business operations; and reducing investor confidence.
We have a disaster recovery plan to address certain contingencies,
but we cannot be assured that this plan will be sufficient in responding or
ameliorating the effects of all disaster scenarios. If our employees or vendors
we rely upon for support in a catastrophic event are unable to respond
adequately or in a timely manner, we may lose clients resulting in a decrease in
AUM which may have a material adverse effect on revenues and net income.
Risks Related to Our
Business
Control by Mr.
Gabelli of a majority of the combined voting power of our common stock may give
rise to conflicts of interests.
Since our initial public offering in 1999, Mr. Gabelli, through his
majority ownership of GGCP, has beneficially owned a majority of our outstanding
class B common stock. As of December 31, 2007, GGCP’s holdings of our class B
common stock represent approximately 95% of the combined voting power of all
classes of our voting stock. As long as Mr. Gabelli indirectly
beneficially owns a majority of the combined voting power of our common stock,
he will have the ability to elect all of the members of our Board of Directors
and thereby control our management and affairs, including determinations with
respect to acquisitions, dispositions, borrowings, issuances of common stock or
other securities, and the declaration and payment of dividends on the common
stock. In addition, Mr. Gabelli will be able to determine the outcome
of matters submitted to a vote of our shareholders for approval and will be able
to cause or prevent a change in control of our company. As a result
of Mr. Gabelli's control, none of our agreements with Mr. Gabelli and other
companies controlled by him can be assumed to have been arrived at through
"arm's-length" negotiations, although we believe that the parties endeavor to
implement market-based terms. There can be no assurance that we would
not have received more favorable terms from an unaffiliated party.
In order to minimize conflicts and potential competition with our
investment management business, in 1999 and as part of our initial public
offering, Mr. Gabelli entered into a written agreement to limits his activities
outside of GBL. On February 6, 2008, Mr. Gabelli entered into an
amended and restated employment agreement which was approved by the GBL
shareholders on November 30, 2007 and which limits his activities outside of
GBL. The
amended agreement ("Amended Agreement") amended Mr. Gabelli’s Employment
Agreement primarily by (i) eliminating outdated provisions, clarifying certain
language and reflecting our name change, (ii) revising the term of the
Employment Agreement from an indefinite term to automatically renewed one-year
periods in perpetuity following the initial three-year term unless either party
gives 90 days written notice prior to the expiration of the annual term
following the initial three-year term, (iii)
allowing for services to be performed for former subsidiaries that are spun off
to shareholders or otherwise cease to be subsidiaries in similar transactions,
(iv) allowing new investors in the permitted outside accounts if all of the
performance fees, less expenses, generated by assets attributable to such
investors are paid to us, (v) allowing for the management fee to be paid
directly to Mr. Gabelli or to an entity designated by him, and (vi) adding
certain language to ensure that the Amended Agreement is construed to avoid the
imposition of any tax pursuant to Section 409A of the Code.
Prior to
our initial public offering in February 1999, GAMCO entered into an Employment
Agreement with Mr. Gabelli. Under the Amended Agreement, the manner of computing
Mr. Gabelli’s remuneration from GAMCO is unchanged.
Mr.
Gabelli (or his designee under the Amended Agreement) will continue receiving an
incentive-based management fee in the amount of 10% of our aggregate pre-tax
profits, if any, as computed for financial reporting purposes in accordance with
U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (before consideration of this fee)
so long as he is an executive of GAMCO and devotes the substantial majority of
his working time to our business. This incentive-based management fee is subject
to the Compensation Committee’s review at least annually for compliance with its
terms.
Consistent
with the firm’s practice since its inception in 1977, Mr. Gabelli will also
continue receiving a percentage of revenues or net operating contribution, which
are substantially derived from AUM, as compensation relating to or generated by
the following activities: (i) managing or overseeing the management of various
investment companies and partnerships, (ii) attracting mutual fund shareholders,
(iii) attracting and managing separate accounts, and (iv) otherwise generating
revenues for the company. Such payments are made in a manner and at rates as
agreed to from time to time by GAMCO, which rates have been and generally will
be the same as those received by other professionals at GAMCO performing similar
services. With respect to our institutional and high net worth asset management
and mutual fund advisory business, we pay out up to 40% of the revenues or net
operating contribution to the portfolio managers and marketing staff who
introduce, service or generate such business, with payments involving the
separate accounts being typically based on revenues and payments involving the
mutual funds being typically based on net operating contribution.
Mr.
Gabelli has agreed that while he is employed by us he will not provide
investment management services outside of GAMCO, except for certain permitted
accounts. These accounts held assets at December 31, 2006 and 2007 of
approximately $97.3 million and $91.4 million, respectively. The Amended
Agreement may not be amended without the approval of the Compensation
Committee.
33
We depend on Mario
J. Gabelli and other key personnel.
We are dependent on the efforts of Mr. Gabelli, our Chairman of the
Board, Chief Executive Officer and the primary portfolio manager for a
significant majority of our AUM. The loss of Mr. Gabelli's services would have a
material adverse effect on us.
In addition to Mr. Gabelli, our future success depends to a
substantial degree on our ability to retain and attract other qualified
personnel to conduct our investment management business. The market
for qualified portfolio managers is extremely competitive and has grown more so
in recent periods as the investment management industry has experienced
growth. We anticipate that it will be necessary for us to add
portfolio managers and investment analysts as we further diversify our
investment products and strategies. There can be no assurance,
however, that we will be successful in our efforts to recruit and retain the
required personnel. In addition, our investment professionals and
senior marketing personnel have direct contact with our Separate Account
clients, which can lead to strong client relationships. The loss of
these personnel could jeopardize our relationships with certain Separate Account
clients, and result in the loss of such accounts. The loss of key
management professionals or the inability to recruit and retain sufficient
portfolio managers and marketing personnel could have a material adverse effect
on our business.
Potential adverse
effects on our performance prospects from a decline in the performance of the
securities markets.
Our results of operations are affected by many economic factors,
including the performance of the securities markets. During the
1990s, unusually favorable and sustained performance of the U.S. securities
markets, and the U.S. equity market, in particular, attracted substantial
inflows of new investments in these markets and has contributed to significant
market appreciation which has, in turn, led to an increase in our AUM and
revenues. At December 31, 2007, approximately 96% of our AUM were
invested in portfolios consisting primarily of equity
securities. More recently, the securities markets in general have
experienced significant volatility. Any decline in the securities markets,
in general, and the equity markets, in particular, could reduce our AUM and
consequently reduce our revenues. In addition, any such decline in
the equity markets, failure of these markets to sustain their prior levels of
growth, or continued short-term volatility in these markets could result in
investors withdrawing from the equity markets or decreasing their rate of
investment, either of which would be likely to adversely affect
us. From time to time, a relatively high proportion of the assets we
manage may be concentrated in particular industry sectors. A general
decline in the performance of securities in those industry sectors could have an
adverse effect on our AUM and revenues.
Possibility of
losses associated with proprietary investment activities.
We may from time to time make or maintain large proprietary
investment positions in securities. Market fluctuations and other
factors may result in substantial losses in our proprietary accounts, which
could have an adverse effect on our balance sheet, reduce our ability or
willingness to make new investments or impair our credit ratings.
Future investment
performance could reduce revenues and other income.
Success in the investment management and mutual fund businesses is
dependent on investment performance as well as distribution and client
servicing. Good performance generally stimulates sales of our
investment products and tends to keep withdrawals and redemptions low, which
generates higher management fees (which are based on the amount of
AUM). Conversely, relatively poor performance tends to result in
decreased sales, increased withdrawals and redemptions in the case of the
open-end Mutual Funds, and in the loss of Separate Accounts, with corresponding
decreases in revenues to us. Many analysts of the mutual fund
industry believe that investment performance is the most important factor for
the growth of open and closed-end funds, such as those we
offer. Failure of our investment products to perform well could,
therefore, have a material adverse effect on us.
Loss of significant
Separate Accounts could affect our revenues.
We had approximately 1,700 Separate Accounts as of December 31, 2007,
of which the ten largest accounts generated approximately 7.4% of our total
revenues during the year ended December 31, 2007. Loss of these
accounts for any reason would have an adverse effect on our
revenues. Notwithstanding performance, we have from time to time lost
large Separate Accounts as a result of corporate mergers and restructurings, and
we could continue to lose accounts under these or other circumstances.
34
During 2007, as in prior years, we experienced client “turnover”.
In the Separate Accounts, over one half of the decrease in assets were
subadvisory assets where the advisor underwent a corporate change in control,
specifically, the sale of the advisor to a third party.
A decline in the
market for closed-end funds could reduce our ability to raise future assets to
manage.
Market conditions may preclude us from increasing the assets we
manage in closed-end funds. A significant portion of our recent growth in the
assets we manage has resulted from public offerings of the common and preferred
shares of closed-end funds. We have raised $1.6 billion in gross assets through
closed-end fund offerings since January 2004. The market conditions for these
offerings may not be as favorable in the future, which could adversely impact
our ability to grow the assets we manage and our revenue.
We rely on
third-party distribution programs.
We have since 1996 experienced significant growth in sales of our
open-end Mutual Funds through Third-Party Distribution Programs, which are
programs sponsored by third-party intermediaries that offer their mutual fund
customers a variety of competing products and administrative
services. Most of the sales growth from our Third-Party Distribution
Programs is from programs with no transaction fees payable by the customer,
which we refer to as NTF Programs. Approximately $3.4 billion of
our AUM in the open-end Mutual Funds as of December 31, 2007 were obtained
through NTF Programs. The cost of participating in Third-Party
Distribution Programs is higher than our direct distribution costs, and it is
anticipated that the cost of Third-Party Distribution Programs will increase in
the future. Any increase would be likely to have an adverse effect on
our profit margins and results of operations. In addition, there can
be no assurance that the Third-Party Distribution Programs will continue to
distribute the Mutual Funds. At December 31, 2007, approximately
89.3% of the NTF Program net assets in the Gabelli/GAMCO and Westwood families
of funds are attributable to two NTF Programs. The decision by these
Third-Party Distribution Programs to discontinue distribution of the Mutual
Funds, or a decision by us to withdraw one or more of the Mutual Funds from the
programs, could have an adverse effect on our growth of AUM.
Possibility of
losses associated with underwriting, trading and market-making
activities.
Our underwriting and trading activities are primarily conducted
through our subsidiary, Gabelli & Company, primarily as
agent. Such activities subject our capital to significant risks of
loss. The risks of loss include those resulting from ownership of
securities, extension of credit, leverage, liquidity, counterparty failure to
meet commitments, client fraud, employee errors, misconduct and fraud (including
unauthorized transactions by traders), failures in connection with the
processing of securities transactions and litigation. We have
procedures and internal controls to address such risks, but there can be no
assurance that these procedures and controls will prevent losses from
occurring.
We may have
liability as a general partner or otherwise with respect to our alternative
investment products.
Certain of our subsidiaries act as general partner for investment
partnerships, including arbitrage, event-driven long/short, sector focused and
merchant banking limited partnerships. As a general partner of these
partnerships, we may be held liable for the partnerships' liabilities in excess
of their ability to pay such liabilities. In addition, in certain
circumstances, we may be liable as a control person for the acts of our
investment partnerships. As of December 31, 2007, our AUM included
approximately $460 million in investment partnerships. A substantial
adverse judgment or other liability with respect to our investment partnerships
could have a material adverse effect on us.
Operational risks
may disrupt our businesses, result in regulatory action against us or limit our
growth.
We face operational risk arising from errors made in the execution,
confirmation or settlement of transactions or from transactions not being
properly recorded, evaluated or accounted for. Our business is highly
dependent on our ability to process, on a daily basis, transactions across
markets in an efficient and accurate manner. Consequently, we rely heavily on
our financial, accounting and other data processing systems. If any of these
systems do not operate properly or are disabled, we could suffer financial loss,
a disruption of our businesses, liability to clients, regulatory intervention or
reputational damage.
35
Dependence on
information systems.
We operate in an industry that is highly dependent on its information
systems and technology. We outsource a significant portion of our
information systems operations to third parties who are responsible for
providing the management, maintenance and updating of such
systems. There can be no assurance, however, that our information
systems and technology will continue to be able to accommodate our growth or
that the cost of maintaining such outsourcing arrangements will not increase
from its current level. Such a failure to accommodate growth, or an
increase in costs related to these information systems, could have a material
adverse effect on us.
We may not be able
to refinance or have the funds necessary to repurchase our existing
indebtedness.
On August 10, 2001, we and certain of our affiliates entered into a
note purchase agreement with Cascade Investment, L.L.C., pursuant to which
Cascade purchased $100 million in principal amount of a convertible promissory
note. Pursuant to the terms of the Note, Cascade may require us, or
upon a change in control or Mr. Gabelli ceasing to provide our predominant
executive leadership, to repurchase the Note (i.e., put option) at par plus
accrued and unpaid interest on the Note. In March 2005, we amended
the terms of the Note. The new terms extended the exercise date of
Cascade's put option to September 15, 2006, reduced the principal of the Note to
$50 million, effective April 1, 2005, and removed limitations on the issuance of
additional debt. In June 2006, GBL and Cascade agreed to amend the terms of the
Note. Effective September 15, 2006, the rate on the Note increased
from 5% to 6% while the conversion price was raised to $53 per share from $52
per share. In addition, the exercise date of Cascade’s put option was
extended to May 15, 2007, the expiration date of the related letter of credit
was extended to May 22, 2007 and a call option was included giving GBL the right
to redeem the Note at 101% of its principal amount together with all accrued but
unpaid interest thereon upon at least 30 days prior written notice, subject to
certain provisions. On April 18, 2007, the Company and Cascade amended the
terms of the Note maturing in August 2011, to extend the exercise date for
Cascade’s put option from May 15, 2007 to December 17, 2007 and to extend the
expiration date of the related letter of credit to December 24, 2007. The
put option expired on December 17, 2007, the related letter of credit expired on
December 24, 2007, and the collateral securing the letter of credit was released
and became unrestricted company assets as of that date. Subsequent to year end,
GBL filed a Form S-3 to register the resale of shares of GBL by Cascade. On
January 22, 2008, Cascade elected to convert $10 million of the Note into
188,679 GBL shares. Cascade requested that the remaining $40 million face value
of notes be segregated into eight notes each with a face value of $5
million.
Our credit ratings
affect our borrowing costs.
Our borrowing costs and our access to the debt capital markets depend
significantly on our credit ratings. A reduction in our credit ratings could
increase our borrowing costs and limit our access to the capital markets.
We face exposure to
litigation within our business.
The volume of litigation against financial services firms and the
amount of damages claimed has increased over the past several
years. The types of claims that we may face are
varied. For example, we may face claims against us for purchasing
securities that are inconsistent with a client’s investment objectives or
guidelines, in connection with the operation of the Mutual Funds or arising from
an employment dispute. The risk of litigation is difficult to assess
or quantify, and may occur years after the activities or events at
issue. Even if we prevail in a legal action brought against us, the
costs alone of defending against the action could have a material adverse effect
on us.
Compliance failures
and changes in regulation could adversely affect us.
Our investment management activities are subject to client
guidelines, and our Mutual Fund business involves compliance with numerous
investment, asset valuation, distribution and tax requirements. A
failure to adhere to these guidelines or satisfy these requirements could result
in losses which could be recovered by the client from us in certain
circumstances. Although we have installed procedures and utilize the
services of experienced administrators, accountants and lawyers to assist us in
adhering to these guidelines and satisfying these requirements, and maintain
insurance to protect ourselves in the case of client losses, there can be no
assurance that such precautions or insurance will protect us from potential
liabilities.
36
Our businesses are subject to extensive regulation in the United
States, including by the SEC and FINRA. We are also subject to the
laws of non-U.S. jurisdictions and non-U.S. regulatory agencies or
bodies. Our failure to comply with applicable laws or regulations
could result in fines, suspensions of personnel or other sanctions, including
revocation of our subsidiaries' registrations as an investment advisor or
broker-dealer. Changes in laws or regulations or in governmental
policies could have a material adverse effect on us. The regulatory
matters described in the “Regulatory Matters” section above or other regulatory
or compliance matters could also have a material adverse effect on us.
Our reputation is
critical to our success.
Our reputation is critical to maintaining and developing
relationships with our clients, Mutual Fund shareholders and third-party
intermediaries. In recent years, there have been a number of
well-publicized cases involving fraud, conflicts of interest or other misconduct
by individuals in the financial services industry. Misconduct by our
staff, or even unsubstantiated allegations, could result not only in direct
financial harm but also harm to our reputation, causing injury to the value of
our brands and our ability to retain or attract AUM. In addition, in
certain circumstances, misconduct on the part of our clients or other parties
could damage our reputation. Harm to our reputation could have a
material adverse effect on us.
We face strong
competition from numerous and sometimes larger companies.
We compete with numerous investment management companies, stock
brokerage and investment banking firms, insurance companies, banks, savings and
loan associations and other financial institutions. Continuing
consolidation in the financial services industry has created stronger
competitors with greater financial resources and broader distribution channels
than our own. Additionally, competing securities dealers whom we rely
upon to distribute our mutual funds also sell their own proprietary funds and
investment products, which could limit the distribution of our investment
products. To the extent that existing or potential customers,
including securities dealers, decide to invest in or distribute the products of
our competitors, the sales of our products as well as our market share, revenues
and net income could decline.
Fee pressures could
reduce our profit margins.
There has been a trend toward lower fees in some segments of the
investment management industry. In order for us to maintain our fee
structure in a competitive environment, we must be able to provide clients with
investment returns and service that will encourage them to be willing to pay
such fees. Accordingly, there can be no assurance that we will be
able to maintain our current fee structure. Fee reductions on
existing or future new business could have an adverse impact on our profit
margins and results of operations.
Risks Related to the
Company
The disparity in
the voting rights among the classes of shares may have a potential adverse
effect on the price of our class A common stock.
The
holders of class A common stock and class B common stock have identical rights
except that (i) holders of class A common stock are entitled to one vote per
share, while holders of class B common stock are entitled to ten votes per share
on all matters to be voted on by shareholders in general, and (ii) holders of
class A common stock are not eligible to vote on matters relating exclusively to
class B common stock and vice versa. The differential in voting
rights and the ability of our company to issue additional class B common stock
could adversely affect the value of the class A common stock to the extent the
investors, or any potential future purchaser of our company, view the superior
voting rights of the class B common stock to have value. On November 30,
2007, class A
common stock shareholders approved that the Board of Directors should consider
the conversion and reclassification of our shares of class B common stock into
class A common stock at a ratio of 1.15 shares of class A common stock for each
share of class B common stock.
Future sales of our class A
common stock in the public market or sales or distributions of our class B
common stock could lower our stock price, and any additional capital raised by
us through the sale of equity or convertible securities may dilute our
stockholders’ ownership in us.
We may
sell additional shares of class A common stock in subsequent public
offerings. We also may issue additional shares of class A common stock or
convertible debt securities. As of December 31, 2007, we had 7,819,741
outstanding shares of class A common stock. On September 1, 2006, a shelf
registration statement on Form S-3 was declared effective by the SEC for the
re-sale of up to 2,486,763 class A shares. Subsequent to December 31, 2007, on
January 18, 2008, a registration statement on Form S-3 was declared effective by
the SEC for the registration for resale
by Cascade of an aggregate of 943,396 shares of class A common stock
issuable upon conversion of the Note. The Note matures on August 14,
2011. On January 22, 2008, Cascade elected to convert $10 million of the Note
into 188,697 GBL shares. Cascade requested that the remaining $40 million face
value of notes be segregated into eight notes each with a face value of $5
million.
37
No prediction can be made as to the effect, if any, that future sales
or distributions of class B common stock owned by GGCP will have on the market
price of the class A common stock prevailing from time to
time. Sales or distributions of substantial amounts of class A
or class B common stock, or the perception that such sales or distributions
could occur, could adversely affect the prevailing market price for the class A
common stock.
None.
At December 31, 2007, we leased our principal offices which consisted
of a single 60,000 square foot building located at 401 Theodore Fremd Avenue,
Rye, New York which expires on April 30, 2013. This building was leased in
December 1997 (prior to our 1999 IPO) from an entity controlled by members of
Mr. Gabelli's immediate family. For 2007, 2006 and 2005 we paid
approximately $856,000, $834,000 and $802,000, respectively under this
lease. Approximately 6,000 square feet was subleased to another tenant up
until July 31, 2007. Another 3,000 square feet was subleased to an
affiliate. We receive rental payments under the sublease agreements, which
totaled approximately $259,000 in 2007 and were used to offset operating
expenses incurred for the property. The lease provides that in
addition to the lease payments, all operating expenses related to the
property, which are estimated at $820,000 annually, are to be paid by us.
We have also entered into leases for office space in both the U.S.
and overseas principally for portfolio management, research, sales and marketing
personnel. These offices are generally less than 4,000 square feet
and leased for periods of five years or less.
From time to time, we are a defendant in various lawsuits incidental to our
business. We do not believe that the outcome of any current
litigation will have a material effect on our financial condition.
On
September 3, 2003, the NYAG announced that it had found evidence of widespread
improper trading involving mutual fund shares. These transactions
included the “late trading” of mutual fund shares after the 4:00 p.m. pricing
cutoff and “time zone arbitrage” of mutual fund shares designed to exploit
pricing inefficiencies. Since the NYAG’s announcement, FINRA, the
SEC, the NYAG and officials of other states have been conducting inquiries into
and bringing enforcement actions related to trading abuses in mutual fund
shares. We received information requests and subpoenas from the SEC
and the NYAG in connection with their inquiries and have complied with these
requests for documents and testimony. We implemented additional compliance
policies and procedures in response to recent industry initiatives and an
internal review of our mutual fund practices and procedures in a variety of
areas. A special committee of all of our independent directors was
also formed to review various issues involving mutual fund share transactions
and was assisted by independent counsel.
As part
of our review, hundreds of documents were examined and approximately fifteen
individuals were interviewed. The Company has found no evidence that
any employee participated in or facilitated any “late trading”. The
Company also has found no evidence of any improper trading in our mutual funds
by our investment professionals or senior executives. As the Company
previously reported, we did find that in August of 2002, we banned an account,
which had been engaging in frequent trading in our Global Growth Fund (the
prospectus of which did not impose limits on frequent trading) and which had
made a small investment in one of our hedge funds, from further transactions
with our firm. Certain other investors had been banned prior to
that. The Company also found that certain discussions took place in
2002 and 2003 between GBL’s staff and personnel of an investment advisor
regarding possible frequent trading in certain Gabelli domestic equity
funds. In June 2006, we began discussions with the SEC staff for a
potential resolution of their inquiry. As a result of these discussions
the
Company increased its SEC reserve from an initial $1 million in 2003 to $16
million in 2006. In February 2007, the Company made an offer of
settlement to the SEC staff for communication to the Commission for its
consideration to resolve this matter. This offer of settlement is subject
to final agreement regarding the specific language of the SEC’s administrative
order and other settlement documents. Should an offer of
settlement with the SEC be agreed upon, it is contemplated that management will
engage a consultant to determine an appropriate distribution of disgorgement
proceeds to affected mutual fund shareholders. Since these discussions are
ongoing, the Company cannot determine at this time whether they will ultimately
result in a settlement of this matter, whether our reserves will be sufficient
to cover any payments by the Company related to such a settlement, or whether
and to what extent insurance may cover such payments.
In
September 2005, we were informed by the staff of the SEC that they may recommend
to the Commission that one of our advisory subsidiaries be held accountable for
the actions of two of the seven closed-end funds then managed by the subsidiary
relating to Section 19(a) and Rule 19a-1 of the Investment Company Act of
1940. These provisions require registered investment companies to
provide written statements to shareholders when a dividend is made from a source
other than net investment income. While the funds sent annual
statements containing the required information and Form 1099-Div statements as
required by the IRS, the funds did not send written statements to shareholders
with each distribution in 2002 and 2003. The staff indicated that
they may recommend to the Commission that administrative remedies be sought,
including a monetary penalty. The closed-end funds changed their notification
procedures, and we believe that all of the funds have been in compliance since
2004.
On November 30, 2007, our
shareholders considered and acted on the following proposals at a
special meeting:
Approve,
subject to final action by our Board of Directors, the distribution to our
shareholders of the shares of common stock of Teton that we
own.
Votes
|
%
Votes Cast*
|
|||||||
FOR
|
209,109,746 | 99.4 | % | |||||
AGAINST
|
1,257,269 | 0.6 | ||||||
ABSTAIN
|
4,590 |
Vote by
our holders of class A common stock on whether our Board of Directors should
consider the conversion and reclassification of our shares of class B common
stock into class A common stock at a ratio of 1.15 shares of class A common
stock for each share of class B common stock.
Votes
|
%
Votes Cast*
|
|||||||
FOR
|
5,072,397 | 97.7 | % | |||||
AGAINST
|
119,347 | 2.3 | ||||||
ABSTAIN
|
828,771 |
Approve
the amended and restated Employment Agreement with Mr. Gabelli, our Chairman and
Chief Executive Officer.
Votes
|
%
Votes Cast*
|
|||||||
FOR
|
210,128,528 | 99.9 | % | |||||
AGAINST
|
240,559 | 0.1 | ||||||
ABSTAIN
|
2,518 |
*
Excludes abstentions
38
Our shares of class A common stock have been traded on the NYSE under
the symbol GBL since our initial public offering on February 11,
1999. Prior to that, there was no public market for our common
stock.
As of March 1, 2008, there were 250 class A common stockholders of
record and 13 class B common stockholders of record. These figures do
not include stockholders with shares held under beneficial ownership in nominee
name, which are estimated to be approximately 2,000.
The following table sets forth the high and low prices of our class A
common stock for each quarter of 2007 and 2006 as reported by the NYSE.
Quarter
Ended
|
High
|
Low
|
||||||
March 31, 2007
|
$ | 43.85 | $ | 37.51 | ||||
June 30, 2007
|
$ | 58.63 | $ | 42.67 | ||||
September 30, 2007
|
$ | 62.43 | $ | 41.90 | ||||
December 31, 2007
|
$ | 70.15 | $ | 52.02 | ||||
March 31, 2006
|
$ |
49.05
|
$ |
38.80
|
||||
June 30, 2006
|
$ |
42.50
|
$ |
32.82
|
||||
September 30, 2006
|
$ |
39.94
|
$ |
33.62
|
||||
December 31, 2006
|
$ |
40.50
|
$ |
36.49
|
We paid our first dividend, a $.02 per share dividend, on December
15, 2003 to our class A shareholders of record December 1, 2003. Our
class B shareholders elected to waive receipt of this dividend.
In 2004, we paid $1.16 per share in dividends to our common
shareholders. This included three quarterly dividends of $0.02 per
share on June 30, 2004, September 30, 2004 and December 28, 2004 to all
shareholders of record on June 15, 2004, September 15, 2004 and December 14,
2004, respectively. We also paid two special dividends, a $0.10 per
share dividend on June 30, 2004 to all shareholders of record on June 15, 2004
and a $1.00 per share dividend on November 30, 2004 to class A shareholders of
record on November 15, 2004 and on December 23, 2004 to our class B shareholders
of record on that date.
In 2005, we paid $0.69 per share in dividends to our common
shareholders. This included three quarterly dividends of $0.02 per
share on March 28, 2005, June 28, 2005, September 28, 2005 to all shareholders
of record on March 14, 2005, June 15, 2005 and September 15, 2005, respectively
and a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share on December 28, 2005 to all
shareholders of record on December 15, 2005. We also paid a special
dividend of $0.60 per share on January 18, 2005 to all shareholders of record on
January 3, 2005.
In 2006, we paid $0.12 per share in dividends to our common
shareholders. This included four quarterly dividends of $0.03 per
share on March 28, 2006, June 28, 2006, September 28, 2006, and December 26,
2006, respectively, to all shareholders of record on February 7, 2006, May 9,
2006, August 8, 2006, and November 13, 2006, respectively.
In June 2006, the holders of 2,347,473 Class B shares exchanged their
B shares for an equal number of Class A shares. Subsequently, the
holders of 154,383 Class B shares have exchanged their B shares for an equal
number of Class A shares.
In 2007,
we paid $1.12 per share in dividends to our common shareholders. This
included four quarterly dividends of $0.03 per share on March 28, 2007, June 28,
2007, September 28, 2007, and December 28, 2007, respectively, to all
shareholders of record on March 15, 2007, June 15, 2007, September 14, 2007, and
December 14, 2007, respectively. We also paid a special
dividend of $1.00 per share to all of our shareholders, payable on July 30, 2007
to shareholders of record on July 23, 2007.
39
The following table provides information with respect to the shares
of our class A common stock we repurchased during the three months ended
December 31, 2007:
Period
|
(a) Total Number of Shares Repurchased
|
(b) Average Price Paid Per Share, net of Commissions
|
(c) Total Number of Shares Repurchased as Part of Publicly
Announced Plans or Programs
|
(d) Maximum Number of Shares (or Approximate Dollar Value) That
May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs
|
||||||||||||
10/01/07 – 10/31/07
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
881,561
|
||||||||||||
11/01/07 – 11/30/07
|
13,100
|
$ |
54.61
|
13,100
|
868,461
|
|||||||||||
12/01/07 – 12/31/07
|
7,100
|
$ |
53.03
|
7,100
|
861,361
|
|||||||||||
Totals
|
20,200
|
20,200
|
||||||||||||||
In November 2006, we announced an increase in the number of shares of
GBL to be repurchased of 400,000 shares. Our stock repurchase program
is not subject to an expiration date.
We are required by the SEC to provide you with a comparison of the
cumulative total return on our class A common stock as of December 31, 2007 with
that of a broad equity market index and either a published industry index or a
peer group index selected by us. The following chart compares the return on the
class A common stock with the return on the S&P 500 Index and an index
comprised of public companies with the Standard Industrial Classification (SIC)
Code 6282, Investment Advice. The comparison assumes that $100 was invested in
the class A common stock and in each of the named indices, including the
reinvestment of dividends, on December 31, 2002. This chart is not intended to
forecast future performance of our common stock.
Dec.
31,
|
Dec.
31,
|
Dec.
31,
|
Dec.
31,
|
Dec.
31,
|
Dec.
31,
|
|||||||||||||||||||
2002
|
2003
|
2004
|
2005
|
2006
|
2007
|
|||||||||||||||||||
GAMCO Investors, Inc.
|
100.00
|
132.56
|
167.69
|
150.74
|
133.59
|
245.18
|
||||||||||||||||||
SIC Code Index
|
100.00
|
131.83
|
169.54
|
211.64
|
275.95
|
319.25
|
||||||||||||||||||
S&P 500 Index
|
100.00
|
128.68
|
142.69
|
149.70
|
173.34
|
182.87
|
40
The following table shows information regarding outstanding options
and shares reserved for future issuance under our equity compensation plans as
of December 31, 2007.
Plan
Category
|
Number of
Securities to be Issued upon Exercise of Outstanding Options, Warrants and
Rights
|
Weighted-Average Exercise Price
of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights
|
|||||||||
Equity compensation plans approved by
security holders:
|
|
|
|||||||||
Stock options |
173,925
|
$ |
31.65
|
||||||||
Restricted stock awards | 382,400 | n/a | |||||||||
Equity compensation plans not
approved by security holders
|
-0-
|
-0-
|
|||||||||
Total
|
556,325
|
|
|||||||||
The
number of securities
remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans
(excluding securities reflected in the first column above) are 875,375. The
allocation of the grants was recommended by the Company's Chairman who did not
receive an RSA award.
41
General
The selected historical financial data presented below has been
derived in part from, and should be read in conjunction with Management’s
Discussion and Analysis included in Item 7 and the audited Consolidated
Financial Statements of GAMCO Investors, Inc. and subsidiaries and related notes
included in Item 8 of this report.
2003
|
2004
|
2005
|
2006
|
2007
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Income
Statement Data
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Revenues:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investment
advisory and incentive
fees
|
$
|
175,195
|
$
|
220,561
|
$
|
220,464
|
$
|
227,005
|
$
|
250,410
|
||||||||||||||
Commission
revenue
|
12,863
|
15,573
|
12,195
|
12,619
|
15,729
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Distribution
fees and other income
|
17,631
|
19,651
|
20,673
|
21,839
|
26,230
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Total
revenues
|
205,689
|
255,785
|
253,332
|
261,463
|
292,369
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Expenses:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Compensation
costs
|
86,998
|
103,837
|
106,146
|
101,995
|
119,571
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Management
fee
|
8,961
|
11,023
|
11,462
|
13,236
|
14,463
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Distribution
costs
|
16,510
|
20,347
|
21,512
|
25,782
|
28,965
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Other
operating
expenses
|
18,872
|
21,455
|
26,665
|
44,103
|
26,203
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Total
expenses
|
131,341
|
156,662
|
165,785
|
185,116
|
189,202
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Operating
income
|
74,348
|
99,123
|
87,547
|
76,347
|
103,167
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Other
income (expense), net:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net
gain from investments
|
15,610
|
5,627
|
10,912
|
41,737
|
6,147
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Interest
and dividend income
|
5,530
|
10,481
|
18,483
|
29,382
|
32,497
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Interest
expense
|
(14,838
|
)
|
(16,027
|
)
|
(13,782
|
)
|
(14,226
|
)
|
(11,965
|
)
|
||||||||||||||
Total
other income (expense), net
|
6,302
|
81
|
15,613
|
56,893
|
26,679
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Income
before income taxes
and
minority interest
|
80,650
|
99,204
|
103,160
|
133,240
|
129,846
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Income
Taxes
|
30,201
|
36,118
|
38,685
|
50,848
|
49,548
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Minority
interest
|
816
|
495
|
533
|
10,465
|
729
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Net
income
|
$
|
49,633
|
$
|
62,591
|
$
|
63,942
|
$
|
71,927
|
$
|
79,569
|
||||||||||||||
Net
income per share:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Basic
|
$
|
1.65
|
$
|
2.11
|
$
|
2.15
|
$
|
2.52
|
$
|
2.83
|
||||||||||||||
Diluted
|
$
|
1.65
|
$
|
2.06
|
$
|
2.11
|
$
|
2.49
|
$
|
2.79
|
||||||||||||||
Weighted
average shares outstanding:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Basic
|
30,018
|
29,673
|
29,805
|
28,542
|
28,142
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Diluted
|
32,081
|
31,804
|
31,155
|
29,525
|
29,129
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Actual
shares outstanding at
December
31st
|
30,050
|
28,837
|
29,543
|
28,241
|
28,064
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Dividends
declared
|
$
|
0.02
|
$
|
1.76
|
$
|
0.09
|
$
|
0.12
|
$
|
1.12
|
42
|
December
31,
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
2003
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
2007
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
Balance
Sheet Data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Total
assets
|
|
$
|
734,759
|
|
|
$
|
697,842
|
|
|
$
|
728,138
|
|
|
$
|
837,231
|
$ |
757,580
|
|
||
Total
liabilities and minority interest
|
|
|
356,658
|
|
|
|
363,142
|
|
|
|
303,637
|
|
|
|
385,655
|
256,265
|
|
|||
Total
stockholders’ equity
|
|
$
|
378,101
|
|
|
$
|
334,700
|
|
|
$
|
424,501
|
|
|
$
|
451,576
|
$ |
501,315
|
|
December
31,
|
||||||||||||||||||||
2003
|
2004
|
2005
|
2006
|
2007
|
||||||||||||||||
Assets
Under Management (unaudited)
|
||||||||||||||||||||
(at
year end, in millions):
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Mutual
Funds
|
$
|
13,332
|
$
|
13,870
|
$
|
13,698
|
$
|
14,939
|
$ |
17,237
|
||||||||||
Institutional
& PWM Separate Accounts
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Direct
|
9,610
|
10,269
|
9,634
|
10,332
|
10,732
|
|||||||||||||||
Sub-advisory
|
3,925
|
3,706
|
2,832
|
2,340
|
2,584
|
|||||||||||||||
Investment
Partnerships
|
692
|
814
|
634
|
491
|
460
|
|||||||||||||||
Total
|
$
|
27,559
|
$
|
28,659
|
$
|
26,798
|
$
|
28,102
|
$ |
31,013
|
43
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND
ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS
|
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the
Consolidated Financial Statements and the notes thereto included in Item 8 to
this report.
Introduction
Our revenues are highly correlated to the level of AUM and fees associated
with our various investment products, rather than our own corporate
assets. AUM, which are directly influenced by the level and changes
of the overall equity markets, can also fluctuate through acquisitions, the
creation of new products, the addition of new accounts or the loss of existing
accounts. Since various equity products have different fees, changes
in our business mix may also affect revenues. At times, the
performance of our equity products may differ markedly from popular market
indices, and this can also impact our revenues. It is our belief that
general stock market trends will have the greatest impact on our level
of AUM and hence, revenues. This becomes increasingly
likely as the base of assets grows.
We conduct our investment advisory business principally through:
GAMCO (Separate Accounts), Funds Advisor (Mutual Funds) and GSI (Investment
Partnerships). We also act as an underwriter and are a
distributor of our open-end mutual funds and provide institutional research
through Gabelli & Company, our broker-dealer subsidiary.
44
Overview
Consolidated
Statements of Income
Investment advisory and incentive fees, which are based on the amount
and composition of AUM in our Mutual Funds, Separate Accounts and Investment
Partnerships, represent our largest source of revenues. In addition
to the general level and trends of the stock market, growth in revenues depends
on good investment performance, which influences the value of existing AUM as
well as contributes to higher investment and lower redemption rates and
facilitates the ability to attract additional investors while maintaining
current fee levels. Growth in AUM is also dependent on being able to
access various distribution channels, which is usually based on several factors,
including performance and service. Historically, we have depended primarily on
direct distribution of our products and services but since 1995 have
participated in Third-Party Distribution Programs, including NTF Programs. A
majority of our cash inflows to mutual fund products have come through these
channels since 1998. The effects of this on our future financial
results cannot be determined at this time but could be material. In
recent years, we have been engaged to act as a sub-advisor for other much larger
financial services companies with much larger sales distribution
organizations. A substantial portion of the cash flows into our
Separate Accounts has come through this channel. These
sub-advisory clients are subject to business combinations that may result in the
termination of the relationship. The loss of a sub-advisory
relationship could have a significant impact on our financial results in the
future.
Advisory fees from the open-end mutual funds, closed-end funds and
sub-advisory accounts are computed daily or weekly based on average net
assets. Advisory fees from the Separate Accounts are generally
computed quarterly based on account values as of the end of the preceding
quarter and accrued monthly. Management fees from Investment
Partnership fees are computed either monthly or quarterly and accrued monthly.
These revenues vary depending upon the level of sales compared with redemptions,
financial market conditions and the fee structure for AUM. Revenues derived from
the equity-oriented portfolios generally have higher management fee rates than
fixed income portfolios.
Revenues from Investment Partnerships also generally include an
incentive allocation or fee of 20% of the economic profit, as
defined. The incentive allocation is generally based on the absolute
gain in a portfolio. We recognize revenue only when the measurement period has
been completed and when the incentive fees have been earned. We also receive
fulcrum fees from certain institutional separate accounts, which are based upon
meeting or exceeding specific benchmark index or indices. These fees
are recognized at the end of the stipulated contract period for the respective
account. Management fees on assets attributable to a majority of the
closed-end preferred shares are earned at year-end if the total return to common
shareholders of the closed-end fund for the calendar year exceeds the dividend
rate of the preferred shares. These fees are recognized at the end of
the measurement period. A total of $1.1 billion of assets in
closed-end funds are subject to such arrangements.
Commission revenues consist of brokerage commissions derived from
securities transactions executed on an agency basis on behalf of mutual funds,
institutional and private wealth management clients as well as
investment banking revenue, which consists of underwriting profits, selling
concessions and management fees associated with underwriting
activities. Commission revenues vary directly with account trading
activity and new account generation. Investment banking revenues are
directly impacted by the overall market conditions, which affect the number of
public offerings which may take place.
45
Distribution fees and other income primarily include distribution fee
revenue in accordance with Rule 12b-1 (“12b-1”) of the Investment Company Act of
1940, as amended (the “Investment Company Act”), along with sales charges and
underwriting fees associated with the sale of the Mutual Funds plus other
revenues. Distribution fees fluctuate based on the level of AUM and the amount
and type of Mutual Funds sold directly by Gabelli & Company and through
various distribution channels.
Compensation costs include variable and fixed compensation and
related expenses paid to officers, portfolio managers, sales, trading, research
and all other professional staff. Distribution costs include
marketing, product distribution and promotion costs, clearing charges and fees
for Gabelli & Company’s brokerage operation. Management fees are
incentive-based and entirely variable compensation in the amount of 10% of the
aggregate pre-tax profits which is paid to Mr. Gabelli or his designee for
acting as CEO pursuant to his amended Employment Agreement so long as he is an
executive of GBL and devoting the substantial majority of his working time to
the business. Other operating expenses includes other general and
administrative operating costs.
Other income and expenses include net gain from investments (which
includes both realized and unrealized gains from trading securities), interest
and dividend income, and interest expense. Net gain from investments is derived
from our proprietary investment portfolio consisting of various public and
private investments.
Minority interest represents the share of net income attributable to
the minority stockholders, as reported on a separate company basis, of our
consolidated majority-owned subsidiaries and for certain partnerships and
offshore funds whose net income we consolidate under FIN 46R "Consolidation of
Variable Interest Entities." and EITF 04-5 "Determining
Whether a General Partner, or the General Partners as a Group, Controls a
Limited Partnership or Similar Entity When the Limited Partners Have Certain
Rights.". Please refer to Note C in our Consolidated Financial
Statements.
Consolidated
Statements of Financial Condition
We ended
the year with approximately $689.0 million in cash and investments, which is net
of $5.3 million of cash and investments held by our consolidated investment
partnerships. This included approximately $127.3 million of our
available for sale securities, consisting of investments in The Gabelli Dividend
& Income Trust, The Gabelli Global Deal Fund, and Westwood Holdings Group
and various Gabelli and GAMCO open-end mutual funds. Our debt
consisted of $100 million of 5.5% senior notes due May 2013 and a $50 million 6%
convertible note due August 2011. We had cash and investments in
securities, net of debt and minority interest, of $18.96 per share on December
31, 2007 compared with $17.12 per share on December 31, 2006. We caution that
this metric, while correct from an accounting point of view, is not always the
same as investors would view cash-on-hand.
Stockholders'
equity was $501.3 million or $17.86 per share on December 31, 2007 compared
to $451.6 million or $15.99 per share on December 31, 2006. The
increase in stockholder’s equity from the end of 2006 was principally related to
a $86.6 million increase in total comprehensive income, partially offset by our
payment of dividends of $31.5 million and the purchase of treasury stock of $8.7
million during 2007.
46
Our liquid balance sheet, coupled with an investment grade credit
rating, provides access to financial markets and the flexibility to
opportunistically add operating resources to our firm, repurchase our stock and
consider strategic initiatives. As a result of a shelf registration which was
filed in June 2005 and which became effective in the third quarter of 2006, we
have the right to issue any combination of senior and subordinate debt
securities, convertible debt securities and equity securities (common and/or
preferred securities) up to a total amount of $520 million.
Our primary goal is to use our liquid resources to
opportunistically and strategically convert our interest income to operating
income. While this goal is our priority, if opportunities are not
present with what we consider a margin of safety, we will consider other ways to
return capital to our shareholders including stock repurchase and
dividends.
Asset
Highlights
We reported
assets under management as follows (dollars in millions):
%
Inc(Dec)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2003
|
2004
|
2005
|
2006
|
2007
|
2007/2006
|
CAGR
(a)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Mutual
Funds
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Open-End
|
$
|
8,088
|
$
|
8,029
|
$
|
7,888
|
$
|
8,389
|
$ |
9,774
|
16.5
|
%
|
8.6
|
%
|
||||||||||||||
Closed-End
|
3,530
|
4,342
|
5,075
|
5,806
|
6,341
|
9.2
|
31.6
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Fixed
Income
|
1,714
|
1,499
|
735
|
744
|
1,122
|
50.8
|
(10.7
|
) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total
Mutual Funds
|
13,332
|
13,870
|
13,698
|
14,939
|
17,237
|
15.4
|
11.4
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Institutional
& Separate Accounts
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Equities:
direct
|
9,106
|
9,881
|
9,550
|
10,282
|
10,708
|
4.1
|
7.7
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
“ sub-advisory
|
3,925
|
3,706
|
2,832
|
2,340
|
2,584
|
10.4
|
(0.2
|
) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Fixed
Income
|
504
|
388
|
84
|
50
|
24
|
(52.0
|
) |
(47.7
|
) | |||||||||||||||||||
Total
Institutional & Separate Accounts
|
13,535
|
13,975
|
12,466
|
12,672
|
13,316
|
5.1
|
4.7
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Investment
Partnerships
|
692
|
814
|
634
|
491
|
460
|
(6.3
|
) |
(4.5
|
) | |||||||||||||||||||
Total
Assets Under Management
|
$
|
27,559
|
$
|
28,659
|
$
|
26,798
|
$
|
28,102
|
$ |
31,013
|
10.4
|
7.9
|
(a) The % CAGR is computed for the five-year period January 1,
2003 through December 31, 2007
Net inflows in 2007 totaled $0.6 billion compared to net outflows of
$3.0 billion and $2.3 billion in 2006 and 2005, respectively.
Total net inflows from equities products were approximately $0.3
billion in 2007, and net inflows from fixed income products were $0.3 billion in
2007.
47
For the three years ended December 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007 our net
cash inflows and outflows by product line were as follows (in
millions):
2005
|
2006
|
2007
|
||||||||||
Mutual
Funds
|
||||||||||||
Equities
|
$
|
167
|
$
|
(802
|
)
|
$
|
829
|
|||||
Fixed
Income
|
(788
|
)
|
(18
|
)
|
331
|
|||||||
Total
Mutual Funds
|
(621
|
)
|
(820
|
)
|
1,160
|
|||||||
Institutional
& PWM Separate Accounts
|
||||||||||||
Equities:
direct
|
(310
|
)
|
(807
|
)
|
(448)
|
|||||||
“ sub-advisory
|
(845
|
)
|
(1,057
|
)
|
(31)
|
|||||||
Fixed
Income
|
(310
|
)
|
(36
|
)
|
(28)
|
|||||||
Total
Institutional & PWM Separate Accounts
|
(1,465
|
)
|
(1,900
|
)
|
(507)
|
|||||||
Investment
Partnerships
|
(208
|
)
|
(236
|
)
|
(53)
|
|||||||
Total
Equities
|
(1,196
|
)
|
(2,902
|
)
|
297
|
|||||||
Total
Fixed Income
|
(1,098
|
)
|
(54
|
)
|
303
|
|||||||
Total
Net Cash (Out) In Flows
|
$
|
(2,294
|
)
|
$
|
(2,956
|
)
|
$ |
600
|
||||
48
For the three years ended December 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007 our net
appreciation and depreciation by product line were as follows (in
millions):
2005
|
2006
|
2007
|
||||||||||
Mutual
Funds
|
||||||||||||
Equities
|
$
|
425
|
$
|
2,034
|
$
|
1,092
|
||||||
Fixed
Income
|
25
|
27
|
48
|
|||||||||
Total
Mutual Funds
|
450
|
2,061
|
1,140
|
|||||||||
Institutional
& HNW Separate Accounts
|
||||||||||||
Equities:
direct
|
(22
|
)
|
1,539
|
834
|
||||||||
“ sub-advisory
|
(29
|
)
|
565
|
313
|
||||||||
Fixed
Income
|
6
|
2
|
2
|
|||||||||
Total
Institutional & HNW Separate Accounts
|
(45
|
)
|
2,106
|
1,149
|
||||||||
Total
Investment Partnerships
|
28
|
93
|
22
|
|||||||||
Total
Equities
|
402
|
4,231
|
2,261
|
|||||||||
Total
Fixed Income
|
31
|
29
|
50
|
|||||||||
Total
Net Appreciation
|
$
|
433
|
$
|
4,260
|
$ |
2,311
|
AUM were
$31.0 billion as of December 31, 2007, 10.4% higher than December 31, 2006 AUM
of $28.1 billion and 2.0% lower than September 30, 2007 AUM of $31.6
billion.
–
|
Our
closed-end equity funds AUM reached $6.3 billion at December 31, 2007,
9.2% above the $5.8 billion on December 31, 2006 and below September 30,
2007 AUM of $6.4 billion. There are currently nine closed-end funds
including the Gabelli Global Deal Fund, which was launched in January
2007. The closed end AUM are comprised
of $5.1 billion common and $1.2 billion of preferred issues
consisting of $548 million of fixed rate issues and $610 million of
variable rate issues.
|
–
|
Our
open-end equity funds AUM at December 31, 2007 were $9.8 billion,
16.5% greater than the $8.4 billion on December 31, 2006 and about the
same as the September 30, 2007 AUM of $9.9 billion.
|
–
|
Our
institutional and private wealth management business had $13.3 billion in
separately managed accounts on December 31, 2007, 5.1% over December 31,
2006 AUM of $12.7 billion versus $13.8 billion on September 30,
2007.
|
–
|
Our
investment partnership AUM were $460 million on December 31, 2007 down
from $491 million on September 30, 2007 and December 31,
2006.
|
–
|
As
of December 31, 2007, assets generating performance-based fees were $3.5
billion, an increase of 10.5% from the $3.2 billion on December 31,
2006 and 3.2% below $3.7 billion on September 30,
2007.
|
49
Operating Results for the
Year Ended December 31, 2007 as Compared to the Year Ended December 31,
2006
Revenues
Total revenues were $292.4 million in 2007, $30.9 million or 11.8%
higher than the total revenues of $261.5 million in 2006. The
increase in total revenues by revenue component was as follows (in
millions):
Increase
(decrease)
|
||||||||||||||||
2006
|
2007
|
$
|
%
|
|||||||||||||
Investment advisory
and incentive fees
|
$ |
227.0
|
$ |
250.4
|
$ |
23.4
|
10.3 | % | ||||||||
Commissions
|
12.6
|
15.7
|
3.1
|
24.6
|
||||||||||||
Distribution fees
and other income
|
21.9
|
26.3
|
4.4
|
20.1
|
||||||||||||
Total
revenues
|
$ |
261.5
|
$ |
292.4
|
$ |
30.9
|
11.8
|
% |
Investment Advisory and
Incentive Fees: Investment advisory and
incentive fees, which comprised 85.6% of total revenues in 2007, are directly
influenced by the level and mix of AUM. At December 31, 2007 AUM were
$31.0 billion, a 10.4% increase from prior year-end AUM of $28.1
billion. Our equity AUM were $29.9 billion on December 31, 2007
versus $27.3 billion on December 31, 2006. Increases in open-end and closed-end
fund assets ($2.3 billion), both from inflows of AUM and the result of market
appreciation and a slight increase in separate account and institutional assets
($620 million) were slightly offset by decreases in AUM in our investment
partnerships ($31 million). Our fixed income assets increased
approximately 45% to $1.1 billion at year-end 2007 from $794 million at the end
of 2006.
Mutual fund revenues increased $20.3 million or 15.1%, driven by
record breaking revenues from our open-end and closed-end equity
funds. Revenue from open-end equity funds increased $13.3 million or
16.6% from the prior year as average AUM in 2007 rose $1.4 billion to $9.4
billion from the $8.0 billion in 2006. Closed-end fund revenues increased $7.0
million, or 13.0%, from the prior year to $60.6 million. Revenue from Separate
Accounts increased $7.9 million, or 9.8%, principally due to higher average
asset levels and increase in fulcrum fees earned on certain
accounts. Assets in our equity Separate Accounts increased $0.6
billion or 5.1% for the year to $13.3 billion.
Total advisory fees from Investment Partnerships fell to $7.2 million
in 2006 from $12.0 million in 2007. Incentive allocations and
fees from investment partnerships, which generally represent 20% of the economic
profit, decreased to $3.5 million in 2007 compared to $6.4 million in
2006 while management fees were $3.7 million in 2007 from $5.6 million in
2006.
Commissions: Commission
revenues in 2007 were $15.7 million, a $3.1 million or 24.6% increase from $12.6
million in 2006. Commission revenues derived from transactions on
behalf of our Mutual Funds and Separate Account clients totaled $12.0 million,
or approximately 77% of total commission revenues in 2007.
Distribution Fees and Other
Income: Distribution fees and
other income increased 20.1%, or $4.4 million, to $26.3 million in 2007 from
2006. The increase was primarily due to higher distribution fees of
$25.0 million 2007 versus $20.6 million for the prior year, principally as a
result of an increase in average AUM due to our increased wholesaling of funds
sold through unaffiliated broker dealers.
50
Expenses
Compensation: Compensation
costs, which are largely variable in nature, increased approximately $17.6
million, or 17.2%, to $119.7 million in 2007 from $102.0 million in
2006. Our variable compensation costs increased $16.6 million to
$88.7 million in 2007 from $72.1 million in 2006 and increased, as a percent of
revenues, to 30.4% in 2007 compared to 27.6% in 2006. While overall
revenues increased, revenues in the Investment Partnership area decreased $4.8
million, as disclosed on page 50. As a result, the compensation
relating to the Investment Partnership area decreased from year to year because
the variable compensation is driven by revenue levels. Fixed compensation
costs rose approximately $0.9 million to $30.8 million in 2007 from $29.9
million in 2006 principally due to increases in salaries, partially offset by
reduced bonus expense.
Management Fee: Management fee expense is incentive-based and entirely variable compensation in the amount of 10% of the aggregate pre-tax profits which is paid to Mr. Gabelli for acting as CEO pursuant to his amended Employment Agreement so long as he is an executive of GBL and devoting the substantial majority of his working time to the business. In accordance with his amended employment agreement, Mr. Gabelli chose to allocate $1.5 million of his management fee to certain other employees of the Company in 2007. In 2007 management fee expense increased 9.3% to $14.5 million versus $13.2 million in 2006.
Distribution
Costs: Distribution
costs, which include marketing, promotion and distribution costs increased $3.2
million or 12.3% in 2007 from the 2006 period.
Other
Operating Expenses: Our
ongoing other operating expenses were $26.2 million in 2007 compared to $27.6
million in 2006. However, total other operating expenses decreased
40.6% from 2006 as a result of a reserve against earnings of approximately
$15.0 million in 2006 relating to the proposed settlement of an SEC inquiry.
Other
Income and Expense
Total
other income (which represents primarily investment income from our proprietary
investments), net of interest expense, was $26.7 million for the year ended
December 31, 2007 compared to $56.9 million in 2006. In 2006, we
adopted FIN 46R and EITF 04-5 which led to the consolidation of certain
partnerships and offshore funds. These accounting changes resulted in $14.2
million of other income, absent in the 2007 full year results. Also contributing
to the year over year decline was the fourth quarter 2007 impairment charge of
$5.1 million from losses on available for sale securities deemed from an
accounting point of view to be other than temporary.
Interest
and dividend income was $32.5 million in 2007 compared to $29.4 million in
2006.
Interest
expense decreased $2.2 million to $12.0 million in 2007, from $14.2 million in
2005. The decrease is due to the maturity of 5.22% Senior notes on
February 17, 2007.
Income
Taxes
The
effective tax rate was 38.2% for the year ended December 31, 2007, consistent
with the prior year’s comparable period.
Minority
Interest
Minority
interest expense was $0.7 million in 2007 compared to $10.5 million in
2006. The decrease was primarily due to the earnings from our
Investment Partnerships, which were consolidated into our results for year ended
December 31, 2006 as a result of FIN 46R and EITF 04-5, and income from
investments at our 92%-owned subsidiary, GSI.
Net
Income
Net
income for 2007 was $79.6 million or $2.79 per fully diluted share versus $71.9
million or $2.49 per fully diluted share for 2006.
Operating
Margin
For the full
year ended December 31, 2007, the operating margin before management fee was
40.2% versus 40.5% in the prior year. The operating margin in 2006 is
before the inclusion of a litigation reserve of approximately $15 million taken
in 2006, a
prepayment of $3.7 million in net distribution expenses and the funding of the
Graham & Dodd, Murray, Greenwald Prize for Value Investing. Operating
margin after management fee was 35.3% for the full year ended December 31,
2007 compared to 29.2% in the prior year.
Shareholder
Compensation and Initiatives
During
2007, we returned $40.2 million of our earnings to shareholders through
dividends and our stock repurchases. We paid $1.12 per share in
dividends ($31.5 million) to our common shareholders in 2007, which included
four quarterly dividends of $0.03 per share on March 28, 2007, June 28, 2007,
September 28, 2007, and December 28, 2007, respectively, to all shareholders of
record on March 15, 2007, June 15, 2007, September 14, 2007, and December 14,
2007, respectively. We also paid a special
dividend of $1.00 per share to all of our shareholders, payable on July 30, 2007
to shareholders of record on July 23, 2007. Through our stock
buyback program, we repurchased approximately 186,400 shares in 2007 for a total
investment of approximately $8.7 million or $46.45 per
share. There remain approximately 862,000 shares authorized under our
stock buyback program on December 31, 2007.
Weighted
average shares outstanding on a diluted basis in 2007 were 29.1 million and
included 0.9 million shares from the assumed conversion of our 6%
convertible note for the full year 2007, as under the applicable accounting
methodology used to compute dilution, the convertible note was
dilutive. The full number of shares which may be issued upon
conversion of this note is approximately 0.9 million. During 2007, we
issued 9,150 shares from the exercise of stock options and 385,400 RSA's. RSA's
affect weighted average shares for diluted earnings per share but not for basic
earnings per share. See Note F for details.
At
December 31, 2007, we had 173,925 options outstanding to purchase our class A
common stock and 382,400 RSA's which were granted under our Stock Award and
Incentive Plans (the “Plans”). The allocation of the RSA's was recommended by
the Company's Chairman who did not receive an RSA
award.
51
Operating Results
for the Year Ended December 31, 2006 as Compared to the Year Ended December 31,
2005
Revenues
Total revenues were $261.5 million in 2006, $8.2 million or 3.2%
higher than the total revenues of $253.3 million in 2005. The
increase in total revenues by revenue component was as follows (in
millions):
Increase
(decrease)
|
||||||||||||||||
2005
|
2006
|
$
|
%
|
|||||||||||||
Investment advisory
and incentive fees
|
$ |
220.4
|
$ |
227.0
|
$ |
6.6
|
3.0 | % | ||||||||
Commissions
|
12.2
|
12.6
|
0.4
|
3.5
|
||||||||||||
Distribution fees
and other income
|
20.7
|
21.9
|
1.2
|
5.6
|
||||||||||||
Total
revenues
|
$ |
253.3
|
$ |
261.5
|
$ |
8.2
|
3.2
|
% |
Investment Advisory and
Incentive Fees: Investment advisory and
incentive fees, which comprised 86.8% of total revenues in 2006, are directly
influenced by the level and mix of AUM. At December 31, 2006 AUM were
$28.1 billion, a 4.9% increase from prior year-end AUM of $26.8
billion. Our equity AUM were $27.3 billion on December 31, 2006
versus $26.0 billion on December 31, 2005. Increases in open-end and closed-end
fund assets ($1.2 billion), principally the result of market appreciation during
fourth quarter 2006 and a slight increase in separate account and institutional
assets ($206 million) were slightly offset by decreases in AUM in our investment
partnerships ($143 million). Our fixed income assets decreased
slightly to $794 million at year-end 2006 from $819 million at the end of
2005.
Mutual fund revenues increased $11.1 million or 9.0%, driven by
revenues from closed-end funds and slightly increased revenues from open-end
equity mutual funds. Closed-end fund revenues increased $10.2
million, or 23.7%, from the prior year to $53.6 million. Revenue from open-end
equity funds increased $0.8 million or 1.0% from the prior year as average AUM
in 2006 rose $0.2 billion to $8.0 billion from the $7.8 billion in 2005.
Revenue from Separate Accounts decreased $1.7 million, or 2.1%,
principally due to lower average asset levels, which was partially offset by a
$4.6 million increase in fulcrum fees earned on certain
accounts. Assets in our equity Separate Accounts increased $0.2
billion or 1.9% for the year to $12.6 billion.
Total advisory fees from Investment Partnerships fell to $12.0
million in 2006 from $14.8 million in 2005. Incentive allocations and
fees from investment partnerships, which generally represent 20% of the economic
profit, increased to $7.7 million in 2006 compared to $7.1 million in 2005 but
were more than offset by a decrease in management fees to $4.3 million in 2006
from $7.7 million in 2005.
Commissions: Commission
revenues in 2006 were $12.6 million, slightly above commission revenues of $12.2
million in 2005. Commission revenues derived from transactions on
behalf of our Mutual Funds and Separate Account clients totaled $9.4 million, or
approximately 75% of total commission revenues in 2006.
Distribution Fees and Other
Income: Distribution fees and
other income increased 5.6%, or $1.2 million, to $21.9 million in 2006 from
2005. The increase was primarily due to higher distribution fees of
$20.6 million 2006 versus $19.4 million for the prior year, principally as a
result of an increase in average AUM due to our increased wholesaling of funds
sold through unaffiliated broker dealers.
52
Expenses
Compensation: Compensation
costs, which are largely variable in nature, decreased approximately $4.2
million, or 3.9%, to $102.0 million in 2006 from $106.1 million in
2005. Our variable compensation costs decreased $5.2 million to $72.1
million in 2006 from $77.3 million in 2005 and decreased, as a percent of
revenues, to 27.6% in 2006 compared to 30.5% in 2005. While overall
revenues increased, revenues in the Investment Partnership area decreased $2.8
million, as disclosed on page 51. As a result, the compensation
relating to the Investment Partnership area decreased from year to year because
the variable compensation is driven by revenue levels. An additional
component of this decrease was the change in the compensation structure and the
decision to not pay certain investment partnership compensation for
2006. On a comparable basis, GBL paid out a lower percentage of
Investment Partnership revenues in related variable compensation in 2006 than we
did in 2005. Fixed compensation costs rose approximately $1.1 million to $29.9
million in 2006 from $28.8 million in 2005 principally due to increases in
salaries and bonuses, partially offset by reduced stock option
expense.
Management Fee: Management fee expense is incentive-based and entirely variable compensation in the amount of 10% of the aggregate pre-tax profits which is paid to Mr. Gabelli for acting as CEO pursuant to his Employment Agreement so long as he is an executive of GBL and devoting the substantial majority of his working time to the business. In 2006, management fee expense increased 15.5% to $13.2 million versus $11.5 million in 2005.
Distribution
Costs: Distribution costs,
which include marketing, promotion and distribution costs increased $4.3 million
or 19.8% in 2006 from the 2005 period. This increase relates
primarily to the voluntary prepayment of distribution expenses of $4.2 million
in connection with a closed-end fund, The Gabelli Dividend & Income Trust,
and continuing distribution costs increases to $1.2 million in 2006 from the
2005 period.
Other Operating
Expenses: Our ongoing other
operating expenses were $27.6 million in 2006 compared to $26.7 million in 2005.
However, total other operating expenses increased 65.2% in 2006 as a result of a
reserve against earnings of approximately $15.0 million relating to the
proposed settlement of an SEC inquiry, an increase in operating expenses of $1.0
million due to the funding of the Graham & Dodd, Murray, Greenwald Prize for
Value Investing, and other donations of approximately $0.5 million. We cannot
determine at this time whether our reserves will be sufficient to cover any
payments by the Company related to such a settlement, or whether and to what
extent insurance may cover such payments.
53
Other Income and
Expense
Our proprietary investment portfolio consists of investments in
mutual funds, U.S. treasury bills, common stocks as well as other investments
including limited partnerships and offshore funds. Net gain from
investments increased to $35.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2006
compared to $9.2 million in 2005. Of the increase, $12.9 million was primarily
due to improved investment results and $13.5 million of the increase was due to
the consolidation of certain partnerships and offshore funds that are not
expected to be consolidated in future periods in accordance with FIN 46R and
EITF 04-5 in 2006.
Interest and dividend income was $35.5 million in 2006 compared to
$20.2 million in 2005.
Interest expense increased $0.4 million to $14.2 million in 2006,
from $13.8 million in 2005. The increase is a result of changes to
the terms of our Note with Cascade. In June 2006, GBL and Cascade agreed to
amend the terms of the $50 million convertible note maturing in August
2011. Effective September 15, 2006, the rate on the Note increased
from 5% to 6% while the conversion price was raised to $53 per share from $52
per share. In addition, the exercise date of Cascade’s put option was
extended to May 15, 2007, the expiration date of the related letter of credit
was extended to May 22, 2007 and a call option was included giving GBL the right
to redeem the Note at 101% of its principle amount together with all accrued but
unpaid interest thereon upon at least 30 days prior written notice, subject to
certain provisions.
Income Taxes
The effective tax rate for 2006 was 38.2% compared to 37.5% in the
prior year. Excluding the tax effects of the reserve against earnings as
described above, the effective tax rate was 37.1%.
Minority
Interest
Minority interest expense was $10.5 million in 2006 compared to $0.5
million in 2005. The increase was primarily due to the earnings from
our Investment Partnerships, which were consolidated into our results for year
ended December 31, 2006 as a result of FIN 46R and EITF 04-5, and income from
investments at our 92%-owned subsidiary, GSI.
Net Income
Net income for 2006 was $71.9 million or $2.49 per fully diluted
share versus $63.9 million or $2.11 per fully diluted share for 2005.
Operating Margin
For the full year ended December 31, 2006, the operating margin before
management fee was 40.5% versus 39.1% in the prior year. The
operating margin in 2006 is before the inclusion of a litigation reserve of
approximately $15 million taken in 2006 and other charges in the fourth quarter
as described above. Operating margin after management fee and the litigation
reserve was 29.2% for the full year ended December 31, 2006 compared to 34.6% in
the prior year.
Shareholder Compensation and
Initiatives
During 2006, we returned $58.0 million of our earnings to
shareholders through dividends and our stock repurchases. We paid
$0.12 per share in dividends ($3.4 million) to our common shareholders in 2006,
which included four quarterly dividends of $0.03 per share paid on March 28,
2006, June 28, 2006, September 28, 2006 and December 26, 2006. Through our stock
buyback program, we repurchased approximately 1,335,000 shares in 2006 for a
total investment of approximately $54.6 million or $40.88 per
share. There remain approximately 1,048,000 shares authorized under
our stock buyback program on December 31, 2006.
Weighted average shares outstanding on a diluted basis in 2006 were
29.5 million and included 1.0 million shares from the assumed conversion of our
6% convertible note for the full year 2006, as under the applicable accounting
methodology used to compute dilution, the convertible note was
dilutive. The full number of shares which may be issued upon
conversion of this note is approximately 0.9 million. During 2006, we
issued 33,250 shares from the exercise of stock options.
At December 31, 2006, we had 193,075 options outstanding to purchase
our class A common stock which were granted under our Stock Award and Incentive
Plans (the “Plans”).
54
Liquidity and Capital
Resources
Our principal assets consist of cash, short-term investments,
securities held for investment purposes and investments in mutual funds, and
investment partnerships and offshore funds, both proprietary and external.
Short-term investments are comprised primarily of United States treasury
securities with maturities of less than one year and money market funds managed
by GBL. Although the investment partnerships and offshore funds are
for the most part illiquid, the underlying investments of such partnerships or
funds are for the most part liquid, and the valuations of these products reflect
that underlying liquidity.
Summary cash flow data is as follows:
2005
|
2006
|
2007
|
||||||||||
(in
thousands)
|
||||||||||||
Cash flows (used in)
provided by from:
|
||||||||||||
Operating
activities
|
$ | (31,029 | ) | $ | (5,708 | ) | $ | 175,263 | ||||
Investing
activities
|
(7,205 | ) | (2,668 | ) | (21,181 | ) | ||||||
Financing
activities
|
(45,626 | ) | (28,390 | ) | (123,890 | ) | ||||||
(Decrease)
increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
(83,860 | ) | (36,766 | ) | 30,192 | |||||||
Cash and cash
equivalents at beginning of year
|
257,096
|
173,161
|
138,113
|
|||||||||
Income related to
investment partnerships and offshore funds consolidated under FIN 46R and
EITF 04-5, net
|
-
|
1,754
|
-
|
|||||||||
Effect of exchange
rates on cash and cash equivalents
|
(75
|
) | (36 | ) | 14 | |||||||
Cash and cash
equivalents at end of year
|
$ |
173,161
|
$ |
138,113
|
$ |
168,319
|
Cash and liquidity requirements have historically been met through
cash generated by operating income and our borrowing capacity. At
December 31, 2007, we had cash and cash equivalents of $168.3 million, an
increase of $30.2 million from the prior year-end primarily due to the Company’s
operating activities. Under the terms of the capital lease, we are
obligated to make minimum total payments of $4.2 million through April
2013.
Net cash provided by operating activities was $175.3 million for the
year ended December 31, 2007, principally resulting from proceeds from sales of
investments in securities of $1,364.3 million, net income of $79.6 million,
$17.2 million in distributions from investments in partnerships and affiliates
and a decrease in receivable from brokers of $17.5 million. Cash flows from
operations were partially offset by $1,253.5 million in purchases of
investments in securities, $18.0 million in purchases of investments in
partnerships and affiliates and a $26.6 million decrease in payable to
brokers. Excluding the net effects of the consolidation of investment
partnerships and offshore funds, our cash provided by operating activities was
$171.1 million. Net cash used in operating activities was $5.7 million for the
year ended December 31, 2006, principally resulting from $1,021.3 million in
purchases of investments in securities, a $42.1 million increase in receivable
from brokers, $4.9 million in purchases of investments in partnerships and
affiliates and $40.0 million from the net effects of the FIN 46R and EITF 04-5
consolidation. The uses were partially offset by proceeds from sales
of investments in securities of $995.4 million, $22.8 million in increase in
accrued expenses and other liabilities, $14.6 million in distributions from
investments in partnerships and affiliates and an increase in compensation
payable of $1.3 million. Excluding the net effects of the
consolidation of investment partnerships and offshore funds, our cash provided
by operating activities was $34.2 million.
Net cash used in investing activities of $21.2 million in 2007 is due
to purchases of available for sale securities of $26.4 million, partially offset
by proceeds from sales of available for sale securities of $5.2
million. Net cash used in investing activities of $2.7 million in
2006 is due to purchases of available for sale securities of $5.4 million,
partially offset by proceeds from sales of available for sale securities of $2.8
million.
Net cash used in financing activities of $123.9 million in 2007
principally resulted from the $82.3 million payoff of 5.22% Senior Notes, the
repurchase of our class A common stock under the Stock Repurchase Program of
$8.7 million and dividends paid of $31.5 million. Excluding the net effects of
the consolidation of investment partnerships and offshore funds, our net cash
used in financing activities was $122.7 million. Net cash used in
financing activities of $28.4 million in 2006 principally resulted from the
repurchase of our class A common stock under the Stock Repurchase Program of
$54.6 million and dividends paid of $3.4 million, partially offset by $29.7
million in contributions by partners into our investment partnerships. Excluding
the net effects of the consolidation of investment partnerships and offshore
funds, our net cash used in financing activities was $58.1
million.
55
We continue to maintain our investment grade ratings which we have received
from two ratings agencies, Moody’s Investors Services and Standard and Poor’s
Ratings Services. We believe that our ability to maintain our
investment grade ratings will provide greater access to the capital markets,
enhance liquidity and lower overall borrowing costs.
Gabelli & Company is registered with the SEC as a
broker-dealer and is regulated by FINRA. As such, it is subject to the minimum
net capital requirements promulgated by the SEC. G&Co's net capital has
historically exceeded these minimum requirements. Gabelli & Company computes
its net capital under the alternative method permitted by the SEC, which
requires minimum net capital of $250,000. As of December 31, 2006 and 2007,
Gabelli & Company had net capital, as defined, of approximately $17.5
million and $19.1 million, respectively, exceeding the regulatory requirement by
approximately $17.3 million and $18.9 million, respectively. Regulatory net
capital requirements increase when Gabelli & Company is involved in
underwriting activities.
Our subsidiary, GAMCO Asset Management (UK) Limited is a registered
member of the Financial Services Authority. In connection with this
registration in the United Kingdom, we have a minimum Liquid Capital Requirement
of £267,000, ($533,000 at December 31, 2007) and an Own Funds Requirement of
€50,000 ($74,000 at December 31, 2007). We have consistently met or
exceeded these minimum requirements.
Market
Risk
Equity Price
Risk
We are subject to potential losses from certain market risks as a
result of absolute and relative price movements in financial instruments due to
changes in interest rates, equity prices and other factors. Our
exposure to market risk is directly related to our role as financial
intermediary and advisor for AUM in our Mutual Funds, Separate Accounts, and
Investment Partnerships as well as our proprietary investment and trading
activities. At December 31, 2007, our primary market risk exposure
was for changes in equity prices and interest rates. At December 31,
2006 and 2007, we had equity investments, including mutual funds largely
invested in equity products, of $279.6 million and $278.8 million,
respectively. Investments in mutual funds, $144.3 million and $136.8
million at December 31, 2006 and 2007, respectively, usually generate lower
market risk through the diversification of financial instruments within their
portfolios. In addition, we may alter our investment holdings from
time to time in response to changes in market risks and other factors considered
appropriate by management. We also hold investments in partnerships
and affiliates which invest primarily in equity securities and which are subject
to changes in equity prices. Investments in partnerships and
affiliates totaled $81.9 million and $100.0 million at December 31, 2006 and
2007, respectively, of which $36.9 million and $27.4 million were invested in
partnerships and affiliates which invest in event-driven merger arbitrage
strategies. These strategies are primarily dependent upon deal
closure rather than the overall market environment.
The following table provides a sensitivity analysis for our
investments in equity securities and partnerships and affiliates which invest
primarily in equity securities, excluding arbitrage products for which the
principal exposure is to deal closure and not overall market conditions, as of
December 31, 2006 and 2007. The sensitivity analysis assumes a 10%
increase or decrease in the value of these investments.
(In
thousands)
Fair
Value
|
Fair Value
assuming
10% decrease
in
equity
prices
|
Fair Value
assuming
10% increase
in
equity
prices
|
||||||||||
At December
31, 2006:
|
||||||||||||
Equity price sensitive investments,
at fair value
|
$ |
387,703
|
$ |
348,933
|
$ |
426,473
|
||||||
At December 31, 2007: | ||||||||||||
Equity price sensitive investments,
at fair value
|
$ | 351,482 | $ | 316,334 | $ | 386,631 |
56
Our revenues are primarily driven by the market value of our AUM and
are therefore exposed to fluctuations in market prices of these assets, which
are largely readily marketable equity securities. Investment advisory
fees for mutual funds are based on average daily or weekly asset
values. Advisory fees earned on institutional and private wealth
management separate accounts, for any given quarter, are generally
determined based on asset values at the beginning of a quarter. Any
significant increases or decreases in market value of assets managed which occur
during a quarter will result in a relative increase or decrease in revenues for
the following quarter.
Investment Partnership advisory fees are computed based on monthly or
quarterly asset values. The incentive allocation or fee of 20% of the
economic profit from Investment Partnerships is impacted by changes in the
market prices of the underlying investments of these products and is not
recognized until the end of the measurement period.
Interest Rate
Risk
Our exposure to interest rate risk results, principally, from our
investment of excess cash in government obligations and money market
funds. These investments are primarily short term in nature, and the
fair value of these investments generally approximates market
value.
Commitments and
Contingencies
We are obligated to make future payments under various contracts such
as debt agreements and capital and operating lease agreements. The
following table sets forth our significant contractual cash obligations as of
December 31, 2007 (in thousands):
Total
|
2008
|
2009
|
2010
|
2011
|
2012
|
Thereafter
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Contractual Obligations:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
5.5% Senior notes
|
$ |
100,000
|
$ |
-
|
$ |
-
|
$ |
-
|
$ |
-
|
$ |
-
|
$ |
100,000
|
||||||||||||||
6% Convertible note
|
50,000
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
50,000
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Capital lease obligations
|
4,205
|
890
|
765
|
765
|
765
|
765
|
255
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Non-cancelable operating
lease obligations
|
1,559
|
562
|
476
|
374
|
147
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Total
|
$ |
155,764
|
$ |
1,452
|
$ |
1,241
|
$ |
1,139
|
$ |
50,912
|
$ |
765
|
$ |
100,255
|
In June 2006, GBL and Cascade agreed to amend the terms of the Note
maturing in August 2011. Effective September 15, 2006, the rate on
the Note increased from 5% to 6% while the conversion price was raised to $53
per share from $52 per share. In addition, the exercise date of
Cascade’s put option was extended to May 15, 2007, the expiration date of the
related letter of credit was extended to May 22, 2007 and a call option was
included giving GBL the right to redeem the Note at 101% of its principal amount
together with all accrued but unpaid interest thereon upon at least 30 days
prior written notice, subject to certain provisions. On April 18, 2007, the
Company and Cascade amended the terms of the Note maturing in August 2011,
to extend the exercise date for Cascade’s put option from May 15, 2007 to
December 17, 2007 and to extend the expiration date of the related letter of
credit to December 24, 2007. The put option expired on December 17, 2007,
the related letter of credit expired on December 24, 2007, and the collateral
securing the letter of credit was released and became unrestrcited company
assets as of that date. Subsequent to year end, GBL filed a Form S-3
to register the resale of shares of GBL by Cascade. On January 22, 2008,
Cascade elected to convert $10 million of the Note into 188,697 GBL shares.
Cascade requested that the remaining $40 million face value of notes be
segregated into eight notes each with a face value of $5 million.
Off-Balance Sheet
Arrangements
We are the General Partner or co-General Partner of various limited
partnerships whose underlying assets consist primarily of marketable securities.
As General Partner or co-General Partner, we are contingently liable for all of
the limited partnerships' liabilities.
Our income from these limited partnerships consists of our share of
the management fees and the 20% incentive allocation from the limited partners.
We also receive our pro-rata return on any investment made in the limited
partnership. We earned management fees of $2.0 million in 2007 and
$1.6 million in 2006 and incentive fees of $1.5 million and $2.4 million in 2007
and 2006, respectively. Our pro-rata gain on investments in these
limited partnerships totaled $0.5 million in 2007 as compared to a pro-rata gain
of $0.8 million in 2006.
We do not invest in any other off-balance sheet vehicles that provide
financing, liquidity, market or credit risk support or engage in any leasing
activities that expose us to any liability that is not reflected in the
Consolidated Financial Statements.
57
Certain
Relationships and Related Transactions
The
following is a summary of certain related party transactions. Further
details regarding these and other relationships will appear in our Proxy
Statement for our 2008 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.
GGCP,
Inc. owns a majority of our Class B Stock, representing approximately 95% of the
combined voting power and 72% of the outstanding shares of our common stock
at December 31, 2007.
We
lease an approximately 60,000 square foot building located at 401 Theodore Fremd
Avenue, Rye, New York as our headquarters (the “Building”) from an entity that
is owned by the children of Mr. Gabelli. Under the lease for the Building, which
expires on April 30, 2013, we are responsible for all operating expenses, costs
of electricity and other utilities and taxes. For 2007, the rent was $855,937,
or $14.27 per square foot, and will increase to $889,570, or $14.83 per square
foot, for the period January 1, 2008 through December 31, 2008. For
2005 and 2006, the rent was $802,384, or $13.37 per square foot, and $834,047,
or $13.90 per square foot, respectively.
Through
August 2007, we sub-leased approximately 5,069 square feet in the Building to an
unaffiliated entity, which paid rent to us at the rate of $28 per square foot
plus $3 per square foot for electricity. We also sub-lease
approximately 3,300 square feet in the Building to LICT Corporation, a company
for which Mr. Gabelli serves as Chairman, which also pays rent to us at the
rate of $28 per square foot plus $3 per square foot for electricity, subject to
adjustment for increases in taxes and other operating expenses. The total
amounts paid in 2005, 2006, and 2007 to us for rent and other expenses under
this lease were $111,332, $113,573, and $115,030, respectively. In
October 2007, we and LICT Corporation further agreed to extend the term of the
sub-lease for a minimum of three years until December 2013 on the same terms and
conditions.
Prior
to our initial public offering in February 1999, the Company and GGCP entered
into a Management Services Agreement, with a one-year term, renewable annually,
under which we will provide certain services for GGCP, including furnishing
office space and equipment, providing insurance coverage, overseeing the
administration of its business and providing personnel to perform certain
administrative services. The Management Services Agreement was renewed in May
2007. Pursuant to the Management Services Agreement, GGCP paid us
$200,000 for services provided in each of the years 2005 and 2006. For
2007, GGCP is currently negotiating an amount and is unlikely to extend this
agreement beyond 2007.
On
May 31, 2006, we entered into an Exchange and Standstill Agreement with
Frederick J. Mancheski, a significant shareholder, pursuant to which, among
other things, he agreed to exchange his 2,071,635 shares of Class B Stock for an
equal number of shares of Class A Stock. Certain shareholders of GGCP, including
two of our executive officers and a director, who received shares of Class B
Stock in a distribution from GGCP, also agreed to exchange their shares of Class
B Stock for an equal number of shares of Class A Stock. Pursuant to a
Registration Rights Agreement that we entered into with Mr. Mancheski, we filed
a shelf registration statement that was declared effective by the SEC on
September 1, 2006 for the sale by Mr. Mancheski and others, including certain of
our officers, employees and a director, of up to 2,486,763 shares of Class A
Stock.
For
2005, 2006, and 2007, we incurred charges of $159,124, $190,477, and $270,787,
respectively, for incremental costs (but not the fixed costs) relating to our
use of an airplane in which GGCP owns a fractional interest.
GAMCO,
a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, has entered into agreements to provide
advisory and administrative services to MJG Associates, Inc., which is
wholly-owned by Mr. Gabelli, and to GSI, a majority-owned subsidiary of the
company, with respect to the private investment funds managed by each of them.
Pursuant to such agreements, GSI and MJG Associates, Inc. paid
GAMCO $50,000 and $10,000, respectively, (excluding reimbursement of
expenses) for each of the years 2005, 2006, and 2007. Manhattan
Partners I, L.P. and Manhattan Partners II, L.P., investment partnerships for
which John Gabelli Inc. is the general partner, paid GAMCO investment
advisory fees in the amount of $54,499 for 2007 and Manhattan Partners I, L.P.
paid management fees in the amount of $16,959 to the general partners of Gemini
Global Partners, L.P. For 2006, the investment advisory fees were
$42,680 and the management fees were $15,779. Comparable amounts for
2005 were $65,443 and $15,598, respectively.
Gabelli
Securities International Limited (“GS International”) was formed in 1994 to
provide management and investment advisory services to offshore funds and
accounts. Mr. Marc Gabelli, who had various responsibilities within several of
our subsidiaries and is the son of our Chairman, owns 55% of GS International
and GSI owns the remaining 45%. In 1994, Gabelli International Gold Fund Limited
(“GIGFL”), an offshore investment company investing primarily in securities of
issuers with gold-related activities, was formed and GS International entered
into an agreement to provide management services to GIGFL. GSI in turn entered
into an agreement with GS International to provide investment advisory services
to GIGFL in return for receiving all investment management fees paid by GIGFL.
Pursuant to such agreement, GSI received investment management fees of $62,184
and incentive fees of $156,211 for 2007. Comparable amounts for 2006
were $49,279 and $209,720, respectively, and for 2005 they were $77,649 and
$168,280, respectively. In April 1999, Gabelli Global Partners,
Ltd., an offshore investment fund, was incorporated. GS International and Gemini
Capital Management, LLC (“Gemini”), an entity owned by Mr. Marc Gabelli, were
engaged by the fund as investment advisors as of July 1, 1999. The fund paid
half of the management fees and incentive fees for 2007 in the amounts of
$36,462 and $11,281, respectively, to GS International, which amounts it in turn
paid to GSI for services provided. Therefore, for 2007, Gemini
received half of the management fee and incentive fee paid by the fund in the
amount of $36,462 and $11,281, respectively. For 2005 and 2006, there
were no incentive fees paid by the fund to GS International but there were
management fees paid by the fund to GS International of $73,696 and $61,651,
respectively, with equal amounts being received by Gemini in each
year. In 2005, GS International incurred $34,179 for the clawback of
incentive fees charged to the investment advisor from the fund, and Gemini
incurred its equal share, or $34,179, for this clawback. No clawback
amounts were recorded in 2006 and 2007. In April 1999, GSI formed
Gabelli Global Partners, L.P., an investment limited partnership for which GSI
and Gemini are the general partners. In March 2002, Gabelli Global Partners,
L.P. changed its name to Gemini Global Partners, L.P. Gemini received half of
the management fee paid by the partnership to the general partners in the amount
of $86,371 and half of incentive fee earned by the general partners in the
amount of $42,929 for 2007. Comparable amounts for 2006 were $90,096 and
$19,515, respectively, and comparable amounts for 2005 were $96,106 and $654,
respectively. In December 1999, Gabelli European Partners, Ltd., an
offshore investment fund, was incorporated. GS International was engaged as an
investment advisor by the fund as of January 1, 2000. For services rendered by
GSI, GS International paid GSI all of the management and incentive fees it
received for 2007 from the fund in the amount of $11,756 and $55,974,
respectively. Comparable amounts for 2006 were $38,915 and $42,133,
respectively, and comparable amounts for 2005 were $41,237 and $56,694,
respectively.
58
At
December 31, 2006 and December 31, 2007, approximately $176 million and $201
million, respectively, of our proprietary investment portfolio were managed by
our analysts or portfolio managers other than Mr. Gabelli. The individuals
managing these accounts receive 20% of the net profits, if any, earned on the
accounts; however, some of the analysts are required to meet a hurdle rate of 5%
before earning this 20% payout. A son of the Chairman, who is our Director
of Trading, was given responsibility in August 2006 for managing an account with
up to $50 million of our proprietary investments, which account was funded with
approximately $40 million during 2006, for which he would be paid on an annual
basis 20% of any net profits earned on the account for the year. For
2006 and 2007, he earned $118,427 and $401,624, respectively, for managing this
account.
As
required by our Code of Ethics, our staff members are required to maintain their
brokerage accounts at Gabelli & Company unless they receive permission to
maintain an outside account. Gabelli & Company offers all of its staff the
opportunity to engage in brokerage transactions at discounted rates.
Accordingly, many of our staff members, including the executive officers or
entities controlled by them, have brokerage accounts at Gabelli & Company
and have engaged in securities transactions through it at discounted rates. From
time to time, we through our subsidiaries in the ordinary course of business
have also provided brokerage or investment advisory services to our directors,
the substantial shareholders listed in the table under “Certain Ownership of Our
Stock” (in item 12 of this report on Form 10-K) or entities controlled by such
persons for customary fees.
We serve
as the investment advisor for the Funds and earn advisory fees based on
predetermined percentages of the average net assets of the Funds. In addition,
Gabelli & Company has entered into distribution agreements with each of the
Funds. As principal distributor, Gabelli & Company incurs certain
promotional and distribution costs related to the sale of Fund shares, for which
it receives a distribution fee from the Funds or reimbursement from the
investment advisor. Gabelli & Company earns a majority of its commission
revenue from transactions executed on behalf of clients of affiliated
companies. Advisory and distribution fees receivable from the Funds
were approximately $23,219,000 and $24,830,000 at December 31, 2006 and 2007,
respectively. GBL earned approximately $1,323,000, $1,308,000 and
$1,400,000 in 2005, 2006 and 2007, respectively, in advisory fee revenues and
approximately $15,000, $20,000 and $21,000 in 2005, 2006 and 2007, respectively,
in distribution fees from our proprietary investments in the Funds which are
included in investment advisory and incentive fees and distribution fees and
other income, respectively, on the consolidated statements of
income.
Gabelli
& Company also participates in syndicated underwriting activities, some of
which involve the issuance of preferred or common shares of Gabelli closed-end
funds. In 2005, 2006, and 2007, there were 2, 1, and 2 such Gabelli
closed-end fund offering underwritings, respectively, with Gabelli &
Company commitments for them of $5.9 million, $14.0 million and $42.5 million,
respectively.
We had an
aggregate investment in the Funds of approximately $277,487,000 and $301,482,000
at December 31, 2006 and 2007, respectively, of which approximately $135,428,000
and $167,357,000 was invested in money market mutual funds, included in cash and
cash equivalents, at December 31, 2006 and 2007, respectively. GBL
earned approximately $4,615,000, $6,550,000, and $6,717,000 in 2005, 2006 and
2007, respectively, in interest income from our investment in our money market
mutual fund. Distributions from the Funds, which are included within interest
and dividend income on the consolidated statements of income, were approximately
$6,236,000, $12,750,000, and $11,391,000 in 2005, 2006 and 2007,
respectively.
Immediately
preceding the Offering and in conjunction with the Reorganization, GBL and our
Chairman entered into an Employment Agreement. Under the Employment
Agreement, we will pay the Chairman 10% of our aggregate pre-tax profits while
he is an executive of GBL and devoting the substantial majority of his working
time to the business of GBL. The management fee was approximately $11,462,000,
$13,236,000, and $14,463,000 for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2006 and
2007, respectively. For 2007, the Chairman allocated $1,452,000 and
in 2006 he allocated $1,250,000 of his compensation to Douglas R. Jamieson, for
activities and support of the Chairman. The Chairman also earned
$15,271,000, $14,763,000 and $19,391,000, respectively, for acting as portfolio
manager and/or attracting and providing client service to a large number of
GAMCO's separate accounts; $17,272,000, $18,112,000 and $20,501,000,
respectively; for creating and acting as portfolio manager of several open-end
funds; $9,557,000, $9,997,000 and $16,723,000, respectively, for creating and
acting as portfolio manager of the closed-end Funds; and $2,087,000, $1,777,000
and $784,000, respectively, for providing other services, including acting as
portfolio and relationship manager of investment partnerships for the years
ended December 31, 2005, 2006, and 2007, which have been included in
compensation costs, of which $4,210,000 and $1,307,000 was payable at December
31, 2006 and 2007, respectively.
On
February 6, 2008, Mr. Gabelli entered into an amended and restated employment
agreement which was approved by the GBL shareholders on November 30, 2007 and
which limits his activities outside of GBL. The Amended Agreement amended Mr.
Gabelli’s Employment Agreement primarily by (i) eliminating outdated provisions,
clarifying certain language and reflecting our name change, (ii) revising the
term of the Employment Agreement from an indefinite term to automatically
renewed one-year periods in perpetuity following the initial three-year term
unless either party gives 90 days written notice prior to the expiration of the
annual term following the initial three-year term,
(iii) allowing for services to be performed for former subsidiaries that are
spun off to shareholders or otherwise cease to be subsidiaries in similar
transactions, (iv) allowing new investors in the permitted outside accounts if
all of the performance fees, less expenses, generated by assets attributable to
such investors are paid to us, (v) allowing for the management fee to be paid
directly to Mr. Gabelli or to an entity designated by him, and (vi) adding
certain language to ensure that the Amended Agreement is construed to avoid the
imposition of any tax pursuant to Section 409A of the Code.
Consistent
with the firm’s practice since its inception in 1977, Mr. Gabelli will also
continue receiving a percentage of revenues or net operating contribution, which
are substantially derived from AUM, as compensation relating to or generated by
the following activities: (i) managing or overseeing the management of various
investment companies and partnerships, (ii) attracting mutual fund shareholders,
(iii) attracting and managing separate accounts, and (iv) otherwise generating
revenues for the company. Such payments are made in a manner and at rates as
agreed to from time to time by GAMCO, which rates have been and generally will
be the same as those received by other professionals at GAMCO performing similar
services. With respect to our institutional and high net worth asset management
and mutual fund advisory business, we pay out up to 40% of the revenues or net
operating contribution to the portfolio managers and marketing staff who
introduce, service or generate such business, with payments involving the
separate accounts being typically based on revenues and payments involving the
mutual funds being typically based on net operating contribution.
Mr.
Gabelli has agreed that while he is employed by us he will not provide
investment management services outside of GAMCO, except for certain permitted
accounts. The Amended Agreement may not be amended without the approval of the
Compensation Committee.
Critical Accounting
Policies
In the ordinary course of business, we make a number of estimates and
assumptions relating to the reporting of results of operations and financial
condition in the preparation of our financial statements in conformity with U.S.
generally accepted accounting principles. We base our estimates on historical
experience, when available, and on other various assumptions that are believed
to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results could differ
significantly from those estimates under different assumptions and
conditions.
We believe the critical assumptions and estimates are those applied
to revenue recognition, the accounting for and valuation of investments,
partnerships, and offshore funds, goodwill and other long-lived intangibles,
income taxes, and stock based compensation accounting.
Major
Revenue-Generating Services and Revenue Recognition
The
Company’s revenues are derived primarily from investment advisory and incentive
fees, commissions and distribution fees.
Investment
advisory and incentive fees are directly influenced by the level and mix of AUM
as fees are derived from a contractually-determined percentage of AUM for each
account as well as fulcrum fees earned on certain accounts. Advisory
fees from the open-end mutual funds, closed-end funds and sub-advisory accounts
are computed daily or weekly based on average net assets and amounts receivable
are included in investment advisory fees receivable in the consolidated
statements of financial condition. Advisory fees from separate
accounts ("Separate Accounts") are generally computed quarterly based on account
values as of the end of the preceding quarter and accrued monthly, and amounts
receivable are included in investment advisory fees receivable in the
consolidated statements of financial condition. Management fees from
Investment Partnerships are computed either monthly or quarterly and accrued
monthly, and amounts receivable are included in other receivables from
affiliates in the consolidated statements of financial condition. The Company
derives approximately 86% of its total revenues from advisory and management
fees. These revenues vary depending upon the level of sales compared with
redemptions, financial market conditions and the fee structure for AUM. Revenues
derived from the equity-oriented portfolios generally have higher management fee
rates than fixed income portfolios.
59
Revenues
from Investment Partnerships also generally include an incentive allocation or a
fee of 20% of the economic profit. The incentive allocation or fee is
generally based on the absolute gain in a portfolio and is recognized at the end
of the measurement period, and amounts receivable are included in other
receivables from affiliates in the consolidated statements of financial
condition. There were $6.6 and $2.8 million in incentive allocations
or fees receivable as of December 31, 2006 and 2007,
respectively. The Company also receives fulcrum fees from certain
institutional separate accounts, which are based upon meeting or exceeding
specific benchmark index or indices. These fees are recognized at the end of the
stipulated contract period for the respective account, and receivables due from
fulcrum fees earned are included in investment advisory fees receivable on the
consolidated statements of financial condition. There was $4.4 and
$5.1 million in fulcrum fees receivable as of December 31, 2006 and 2007,
respectively. Management fees on a majority of the closed-end
preferred shares are received at year-end if the total return to common
shareholders of the closed-end fund for the calendar year exceeds the dividend
rate of the preferred shares. These fees are recognized at the end of
the measurement period. Receivables due on management fees on
closed-end preferred shares are included in investment advisory fees receivable
on the consolidated statements of financial condition. There were $10.5 and
$10.1 million in management fees receivable on closed-end preferred shares as of
December 31, 2006 and 2007, respectively.
Gabelli
& Company, Inc., a subsidiary of GBL, generates brokerage commission
revenues and related clearing charges on a trade-date basis from securities
transactions executed on an agency basis on behalf of institutional clients and
mutual funds, private wealth management clients and retail customers of
affiliate companies. It is also involved in syndicated underwriting
activities. It participates in syndicated underwritings of public
equity and debt offerings managed by major investment banks. It provides
institutional investors and investment partnerships with investment ideas on
numerous industries and special situations, with a particular focus on small-cap
and mid-cap companies. The team of sell-side analysts follow economic
sectors on a global basis, and are bottom-up stock pickers, recommending
companies that trade at significant differences to PMV. PMV investing
is a disciplined, research-driven approach based on the extensive use of
security analysis. In this process, it carefully selects stocks whose
intrinsic value, based on its estimate of current asset value and future growth
and earnings power, is significantly different from the value as reflected in
the public market. It then calculates the firm’s PMV, which is
defined as the price an informed industrial buyer would by likely to pay to
acquire the business. The research focuses on company fundamentals,
cash flow statistics, and catalysts that will help realize returns.
Distribution
fees revenues are derived primarily from the distribution of Gabelli mutual
funds (“Funds”) advised by two subsidiaries of GBL, Gabelli Funds, LLC and
Gabelli Advisers, Inc. Another GBL subsidiary, Gabelli & Company,
distributes our open-end Funds pursuant to distribution agreements with each
Fund. Under each distribution agreement with an open-end Fund,
Gabelli & Company offers and sells such open-end Fund shares on a continuous
basis and pays all of the costs of marketing and selling the shares, including
printing and mailing prospectuses and sales literature, advertising and
maintaining sales and customer service personnel and sales and services
fulfillment systems, and payments to the sponsors of Third-Party Distribution
Programs, financial intermediaries and Gabelli & Company’s sales
personnel. Gabelli & Company receives fees for such services
pursuant to distribution plans adopted under provisions of Rule 12b-1 of the
Investment Company Act. Gabelli & Company is the principal
underwriter for funds distributed in multiple classes of shares which carry
either a front-end or back-end sales charge.
Under the
distribution plans, the open-end Class AAA shares of the Funds (except The
Gabelli US Treasury Money Market Fund, Gabelli Capital Asset Fund and The
Gabelli ABC Fund) and the Class A shares of various Funds pay Gabelli &
Company a distribution or service fee of .25% per year (except the Class A
shares of the Westwood Funds which pay .50% per year) on the average daily net
assets of the fund. Class B and Class C shares have a 12b-1 distribution plan
with a service and distribution fee totaling 1%. Gabelli &
Company’s distribution agreements with the Funds may continue in effect from
year to year only if specifically approved at least annually by (i) the Fund's
Board of Directors or Trustees or (ii) the Fund's shareholders and, in either
case, the vote of a majority of the Fund's directors or trustees who are not
parties to the agreement or "interested persons" of any such party, within the
meaning of the Investment Company Act. Each Fund may terminate its distribution
agreement, or any agreement thereunder, at any time upon 60 days' written notice
by (i) a vote of the majority of its directors or trustees cast in person at a
meeting called for the purpose of voting on such termination or (ii) a vote at a
meeting of shareholders of the lesser of either 67% of the voting shares
represented in person or by proxy or 50% of the outstanding voting shares of
such Fund. Each distribution agreement automatically terminates in the event of
its assignment, as defined in the Investment Company Act. Gabelli
& Company may terminate a distribution agreement without penalty upon 60
days' written notice.
Distribution
fees from the open-end mutual funds are computed daily based on average net
assets and are accrued monthly. The amounts receivable for distribution fees are
included in other receivables from affiliates on the consolidated statements of
financial condition.
Finally,
GBL also has investment income generated from its proprietary trading
activities.
GBL’s
principal market is in the United States. In 2007, the GBL opened a
research office in Shanghai, China and another in Singapore in early 2008 and
will continue to evaluate adding additional research offices throughout the
world.
Investments in
Securities Transactions and Commissions Revenue and Clearing
Charges
Investments in securities are accounted for as either “trading
securities” or “available for sale” and are stated at quoted market values.
Securities that are not readily marketable are stated at their estimated fair
values as determined by our management. The resulting unrealized gains and
losses for trading securities are included in net gain from investments, and the
unrealized gains and losses for available for sale securities, net of management
fees and tax, are reported as a separate component of stockholders’
equity. Securities transactions and any related gains and losses are
recorded on a trade date basis. Realized gains and losses from securities
transactions are recorded on the identified cost basis and are included in net
gain from investments. Commissions revenue and related clearing
charges are recorded on a trade date basis.
Securities sold, but not yet purchased are recorded at trade date,
and are stated at quoted market values and represent obligations of GBL to
purchase the securities at prevailing market prices. Therefore, the future
satisfaction of such obligations may be for an amount greater or less than the
amounts recorded on the consolidated statements of financial
condition. The ultimate gains or losses recognized are dependent upon
the prices at which these securities are purchased to settle the obligations
under the sales commitments.
Investments in Partnerships and
Affiliates
Beginning
January 1, 2006, the provisions of FIN 46R and EITF 04-5 require consolidation
of the majority of our investment partnerships and offshore funds managed by our
subsidiaries into our consolidated financial statements. However,
since we amended the agreements of certain investment partnerships and an
offshore fund on March 31, 2006, FIN 46R and EITF 04-5 only required us to
consolidate these entities on our consolidated statement of income and
consolidated statement of cash flows for the first quarter 2006. We were not
required to consolidate these entities on our consolidated statement of
financial condition at March 31, 2006. In addition, these
partnerships and offshore funds, for which the agreements were amended, are not
required to be consolidated within our consolidated statement of income and
consolidated statement of cash flows or on our consolidated statement of
financial condition in the second quarter or future periods as long as GBL
continues to not maintain direct or indirect control over the investment
partnerships and offshore funds. For the year ended December 31,
2006, the consolidation of these entities for the first quarter 2006 had no
effect on net income but does affect the classification of income between
operating and other income.
60
We were not required to consolidate these entities on our consolidated
statements of financial condition at March 31, 2006. In addition,
these partnerships and offshore funds, for which the agreements were amended,
are not required to be consolidated within our consolidated statements of income
and consolidated statements of cash flows or on our consolidated statements of
financial condition from the second quarter of 2006 and forward as long as GBL
continues to not maintain direct or indirect control over the investment
partnerships and offshore funds. For the year ended December 31,
2006, the consolidation of these entities for the first quarter 2006 had no
effect on net income but did affect the classification of income between
operating and other income. The equity method of accounting is applied for the
investment partnerships and offshore funds that are not consolidated under the
provisions of FIN 46R and EITF 04-5.
We also consolidated five other investment partnerships and two other
offshore funds in which we have a direct or indirect controlling financial
interest as of and for the year ended December 31, 2006. These
entities have been consolidated within our consolidated financial statements for
the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2007 and will continue to be consolidated
in future periods as long as we continue to maintain a direct or indirect
controlling financial interest. In addition to minor FIN 46R and EITF
04-5 adjustments to the consolidated statements of income and consolidated
statements of cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2007 related
to these entities, the consolidation of these entities also resulted in minor
adjustments to our consolidated statements of financial condition at December
31, 2006 and 2007.
For 2006, six entities, five investment partnerships and one offshore
fund, were consolidated as a result of applying the guidance in EITF 04-5 and
one entity, an offshore fund, was consolidated as a result of applying the
guidance in FIN 46R. In 2007, eight entities (six investment partnerships and
two offshore funds) are consolidated as a result of applying the guidance in
EITF 04-5. No entities were consolidated as a result of FIN 46R for 2007 as the
Company was no longer considered the primary beneficiary effective January 1,
2007.
For the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2007, the consolidation of these
entities had no impact on net income but did result in (a) the elimination of
revenues and expenses which are now intercompany transactions; (b) the recording
of all the partnerships’ operating expenses of these entities including those
pertaining to third-party interests; (c) the recording of all other income of
these entities including those pertaining to third-party interests; (d)
recording of income tax expense of these entities including those pertaining to
third party interests and (e) the recording of minority interest which offsets
the net amount of any of the partnerships’ revenues, operating expenses, other
income and income taxes recorded in these respective line items which pertain to
third-party interest in these entities. While this had no impact on
net income, the consolidation of these entities does affect the classification
of income between operating and other income.
Goodwill
Prior to the issuance of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
(“SFAS”) No. 142, goodwill and other long-lived intangible assets were amortized
each year. The adoption of SFAS No. 142 at the beginning of 2002
eliminated the amortization of these assets and established requirements for
having them tested for impairment at least annually.
There was
an impairment charge of $56,000 recorded for the year ended December 31, 2007 as
a result of the voluntary deregistration of an inactive broker dealer
subsidiary.
At November 30, 2006 and November 30, 2007, management conducted its
annual assessments and assessed the recoverability of goodwill and determined
that there was no further impairment of the remaining goodwill on GBL’s
consolidated financial statements. In assessing the recoverability of
goodwill, projections regarding estimated future cash flows and other factors
are made to determine the fair value of the respective assets. If
these estimates or related projections change in the future, it may result in an
impairment charge for these assets to income.
Income Taxes
In June
2006, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in
Income Taxes” (“FIN 48”), which is an interpretation of FAS 109. This
interpretation prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for
the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or
expected to be taken in a tax return. The Company adopted this
interpretation on January 1, 2007.
In May
2007, the FASB issued FSP FIN 48-1, “Definition of Settlement in FASB
Interpretation No. 48”, amending FSP FIN 48 to clarify that a tax position could
be effectively settled upon examination by a taxing authority. We have updated
our schedule of uncertain tax positions and the impact of taxes, interest, and
penalties has been reflected within our income tax provision and disclosed
within our footnotes to the consolidated financial
statements.
Income tax expense is based on pre-tax financial accounting income, including adjustments made for the recognition or derecognition related to uncertain tax positions. The recognition or derecognition of income tax expense related to uncertain tax positions is determined under the guidance as prescribed by FIN 48. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to be recovered or concluded. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in earnings in the period that includes the enactment date.
Stock Based
Compensation
Effective January 1, 2003, we use a fair value based method of
accounting for stock-based compensation provided to our employees in accordance
with SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock Based Compensation.” The
estimated fair value of option awards is determined using the Black Scholes
option-pricing model. This sophisticated model utilizes a number of
assumptions in arriving at its results, including the estimated life of the
option, the risk free interest rate at the date of grant and the volatility of
the underlying common stock. There may be other factors, which have
not been considered, which may have an effect on the value of the options as
well. The effects of changing any of the assumptions or factors
employed by the Black Scholes model may result in a significantly different
valuation for the options. We adopted Statement 123 (R), “Share-Based
Payment” (“Statement 123 (R)”) on January 1, 2005. In light of our
modified prospective adoption of the fair value recognition provisions of
Statement 123 (R) for all grants of employee stock options, the adoption of
Statement 123 (R) did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial
statements.
On
December 7, 2007, employees of the Company were granted 385,400 RSA's . The
allocation of the RSA's was recommended by the Company's Chairman who did not
receive an RSA award. Under the terms of the RSA, employees will vest 30% of
their respective awards after 3 years of service and vest 70% of their
respective awards after 5 years of service. The
closing share price of GBL shares on December 20, 2007 was $63.50, which is
the grant date for purposes of calculation of the compensation expense to
be recognized over the 5 year vesting period. During the vesting period,
dividends to RSA holders are held until their shares have vested. Dividends paid
on equity awards that vest are charged to retained
earnings.
61
Recent Accounting
Developments
In
February 2006, the FASB issued FASB Statement No. 155, “Accounting for Certain
Hybrid Financial Instruments – an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133 and 140,”
(“Statement 155”) that amends FASB Statements No. 133 “Accounting for Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities,” (“Statement 133”) and No. 140 “Accounting
for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of
Liabilities a replacement of FASB Statement 125” (“Statement
140”). The statement permits fair value remeasurement for any hybrid
financial instrument that contains an embedded derivative that otherwise would
require bifurcation; clarifies which interest-only strips and principal-only
strips are not subject to the requirements of Statement 133; establishes a
requirement to evaluate interests in securitized financial assets to identify
interests that are freestanding derivatives or that are hybrid financial
instruments that contain an embedded derivative requiring bifurcation; clarifies
that concentrations of credit risk in the form of subordination are not embedded
derivatives; amends Statement 140 to eliminate the prohibition on a qualifying
special-purpose entity from holding a derivative financial instrument that
pertains to a beneficial interest other than another derivative financial
instrument. Statement 155 does not permit prior period
restatement. The statement is effective for all financial instruments
acquired or issued after the beginning of an entity’s first fiscal year that
begins after September 15, 2006. The Company adopted this statement
on January 1, 2007. The impact of adopting this statement has been
immaterial to the Company’s consolidated financial
statements.
In April
2006, the FASB issued FSP FIN 46R-6 “Determining the Variability to be
Considered in Applying FASB Interpretation No. 46R” (“FIN
46-R-6”). FIN 46-R-6 addresses certain major implementation issues
related to FIN 46R, specifically how a reporting enterprise should determine the
variability to be considered in applying FIN 46R. FIN 46-R-6 is effective as of
the beginning of the first day of the first reporting period beginning after
September 15, 2006. The Company adopted this Statement on January 1,
2007. The impact of adopting this statement has been immaterial to
the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
In June
2006, the FASB issued FIN 48, which is an interpretation of FAS 109. This
interpretation prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for
the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or
expected to be taken in a tax return. This interpretation is effective for
fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006. The Company adopted this
interpretation on January 1, 2007. See Note D to the
consolidated financial statements of this report on Form 10-K for
discussion.
In
September 2006, the FASB issued FASB Statement No. 157, “Fair Value
Measurements” (“Statement 157”). The statement provides guidance for using fair
value to measure assets and liabilities. The statement provides guidance to
companies about the extent of which to measure assets and liabilities at fair
value, the information used to measure fair value, and the effect of fair value
measurements on earnings. The statement applies whenever other standards require
(or permit) assets or liabilities to be measured at fair value. The statement
does not expand the use of fair value in any new circumstances. The statement is
effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after
November 15, 2007 and for interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company
plans to adopt this statement on January 1, 2008. The impact of adopting
Statement 157 is expected to be immaterial to the Company’s consolidated
financial statements.
In
September 2006, the SEC released Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 108, "Considering
the Effects of Prior Year Misstatements when Quantifying Misstatements in
Current Year Financial Statements" (the “SAB”). The SAB addresses diversity in
how companies consider and resolve the quantitative effect of financial
statement misstatements. The SAB is effective as of the beginning
of the first day of the first reporting period beginning after
November 15, 2006. The Company adopted this SAB on January 1,
2007. The impact of adopting this SAB has been immaterial to the
Company’s consolidated financial statements.
In
February 2007, the FASB issued FASB Statement No. 159, “The Fair Value
Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities – Including an Amendment
of FASB Statement No. 115,” (“Statement 159”), which provides companies with an
option to report selected financial assets and liabilities at fair value. The
standard’s objective is to reduce both the complexity in accounting for
financial instruments and the volatility in earnings caused by measuring related
assets and liabilities differently. Statement 159 also establishes presentation
and disclosure requirements designed to facilitate comparisons between companies
that choose different measurement attributes for similar types of assets and
liabilities. This statement is effective as of the beginning of an
entity’s first fiscal year beginning after November 15, 2007. Early adoption is
permitted as of the beginning of the previous fiscal year provided that the
entity makes that choice in the first 120 days of that fiscal year and also
elects to apply the provisions of Statement 157. The Company plans to
adopt this statement on January 1, 2008. The impact of adopting
Statement 159 is expected to be immaterial to the Company’s consolidated
financial statements because the Company has not elected to report selected
financial assets and liabilities at fair value.
In June 2007, the FASB
issued Emerging Issues Task Force ("EITF") 06-11, "Accounting
for Income Tax Benefits of Dividends on Share-Based Payment
Awards". The
EITF release discusses how an entity should recognize the income tax benefit
received on dividends that are (a) paid to employees holding equity-classified
nonvested shares, equity-classified nonvested share units, or equity-classified
outstanding share options and (b) charged to retained earnings under FAS
123(R).The
release became relevant to the Company after the Board of Directors authorized
the issuance of restricted stock awards (share based payments) to Company
employees in December 2007. Employees
of the Company who received shares in the 2007 granting of restricted stock
awards earn dividends which are held for them until the RSA vesting dates and
are forfeited if they are no longer employed by the Company on those dates.
Accordingly, because they are not entitled to receive dividends on their
unvested shares, the release does not have any financial impact on the Company
for the year ended December 31, 2007.
In
December 2007, the FASB issued FASB Statement No. 160, "Noncontrolling
Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements, an
Amendment of ARB No. 51" ("Statement 160") to
improve the relevance, comparability, and transparency of the financial
information that a reporting entity with minority interests provides in its
consolidated financial statements. Statement
160 changes the way the consolidated income statement is presented. It requires
consolidated net income to be reported at amounts that include the amounts
attributable to both the parent and the noncontrolling interest. It also
requires disclosure, on the face of the consolidated statement of income, of the
amounts ofconsolidated
net income attributable to the parent and to the noncontrolling interest.
Statement
160 requires expanded disclosures in the consolidated financial statements that
clearly identify and distinguish between the interests of the parent’s owners
and the interests of the noncontrolling owners of a subsidiary. Statement 160
does not change the provisions of “Consolidation
of Variable Interest Entities—An Interpretation of Accounting Research
Bulletin No. 51” ("ARB 51") related to consolidation purpose
or consolidation policy or the requirement that a parent consolidate
all entities in which it has a controlling financial interest. Statement 160
does, however, amend certain of ARB 51’s consolidation procedures to make them
consistent with the requirements of FASB Statement 141(R) "Business
Combinations". It also amends ARB 51 to provide definitions for certain terms
and to clarify some terminology. This
Statement is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal
years, beginning on or after December 15, 2008. Earlier adoption is
prohibited. The Company plans to adopt this statement on January 1, 2009.
Statement 160 will impact the Company's consolidated financial statements
presentation and disclosure of minority
interest.
62
Seasonality and
Inflation
We do not believe our operations are subject to significant seasonal
fluctuations. We do not believe inflation will significantly affect our
compensation costs, as they are substantially variable in nature. However, the
rate of inflation may affect our expenses such as information technology and
occupancy costs. To the extent inflation results in rising interest rates and
has other effects upon the securities markets, it may adversely affect our
financial position and results of operations by reducing our AUM, revenues or
otherwise.
Reference is made to the information contained under the heading
"Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations -- Market Risk."
63
GAMCO INVESTORS,
INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
INDEX TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Page
|
|
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting
Firm
|
F-2
|
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on Effectiveness of Internal Control over Financial Reporting | F-3 |
Consolidated Financial
Statements:
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Income for the years ended December
31, 2005, 2006 and 2007
|
F-4
|
Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition at December
31, 2006 and 2007
|
F-5
|
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity for the
years ended December 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007
|
F-6
|
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended
December 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007
|
F-7
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements
|
F-9
|
All schedules for which provision is made in the applicable
accounting regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission that are not
required under the related instructions or are inapplicable have been
omitted.
F -
1
REPORT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The
Board of Directors and Stockholders
GAMCO
Investors, Inc. and Subsidiaries
We
have audited the accompanying consolidated statements of financial condition of
GAMCO Investors, Inc. and Subsidiaries (“GAMCO”) as of December 31, 2007 and
2006, and the related consolidated statements of income, stockholders’ equity,
and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31,
2007. These financial statements are the responsibility of GAMCO’s
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these
financial statements based on our audits.
We
conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan
and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial
statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial
statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall
financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
In
our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all
material respects, the consolidated financial position of GAMCO Investors, Inc.
and Subsidiaries at December 31, 2007 and 2006, and the consolidated results of
their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period
ended December 31, 2007, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting
principles.
As
discussed in Note D Income Taxes to the consolidated financial statements, GAMCO
adopted FASB Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income
Taxes” on January 1, 2007.
We
also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States), GAMCO Investors, Inc. and
Subsidiaries’ internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2007,
based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by
the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our
report dated March 17, 2008, expressed an unqualified opinion
thereon.
ERNST
& YOUNG LLP
New
York, New York
March
17, 2008
F -
2
REPORT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM ON EFFECTIVENESS OF INTERNAL
CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
The Board
of Directors and Stockholders
GAMCO
Investors, Inc. and Subsidiaries
We have
audited GAMCO Investors, Inc. and Subsidiaries’ (“GAMCO’s”) internal control
over financial reporting as of December 31, 2007, based on criteria established
in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission (the COSO criteria). GAMCO’s management
is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial
reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over
financial reporting included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal
Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on
the company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our
audit.
We
conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan
and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective
internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material
respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over
financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing
and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based
on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered
necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable
basis for our opinion.
A
company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting
and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance
with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over
financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to
the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly
reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2)
provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to
permit preparation of consolidated financial statements in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of
the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management
and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding
prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition
of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the consolidated
financial statements.
Because
of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not
prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation
of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may
become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of
compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our
opinion, GAMCO Investors, Inc. and Subsidiaries maintained, in all material
respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31,
2007, based on the
COSO criteria.
We also
have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated statements of financial
condition of GAMCO Investors, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 2007 and
2006, and the related consolidated statements of income, stockholders’ equity,
and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31,
2007, of GAMCO Investors, Inc. and Subsidiaries and our report dated March 17,
2008, expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
ERNST & YOUNG LLP
New York,
New York
March 17,
2008
F -
3
GAMCO INVESTORS,
INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(In thousands,
except per share data)
Year ended
December 31,
|
||||||||||||
2005
|
2006
|
2007
|
||||||||||
Revenues | ||||||||||||
Investment advisory and incentive
fees
|
$ |
220,464
|
$ |
227,005
|
$ |
250,410
|
||||||
Commission
revenue
|
12,195
|
12,619
|
15,729
|
|||||||||
Distribution fees and other
income
|
20,673
|
21,839
|
26,230
|
|||||||||
Total
revenues
|
253,332
|
261,463
|
292,369
|
|||||||||
Expenses | ||||||||||||
Compensation
costs
|
106,147
|
101,995
|
119,571
|
|||||||||
Management
fee
|
11,462
|
13,236
|
14,463
|
|||||||||
Distribution
costs
|
21,512
|
25,782
|
28,965
|
|||||||||
Other operating
expenses
|
26,665
|
44,103
|
26,203
|
|||||||||
Total
expenses
|
165,786
|
185,116
|
189,202
|
|||||||||
Operating
income
|
87,546
|
76,347
|
103,167
|
|||||||||
Other Income
(Expense)
|
||||||||||||
Net gain from
investments
|
9,172
|
35,613
|
6,147
|
|||||||||
Interest and dividend
income
|
20,223
|
35,506
|
32,497
|
|||||||||
Interest
expense
|
(13,782 | ) | (14,226 | ) | (11,965 | ) | ||||||
Total other income,
net
|
15,613
|
56,893
|
26,679
|
|||||||||
Income before income taxes and minority interest
|
103,159
|
133,240
|
129,846
|
|||||||||
Income
taxes
|
38,685
|
50,848
|
49,548
|
|||||||||
Minority
interest
|
533
|
10,465
|
729
|
|||||||||
Net
income
|
$ |
63,941
|
$ |
71,927
|
$ |
79,569
|
||||||
Net income per share:
|
||||||||||||
Basic
|
$ |
2.15
|
$ |
2.52
|
$ |
2.83
|
||||||
Diluted
|
$ |
2.11
|
$ |
2.49
|
$ |
2.79
|
||||||
Weighted average shares outstanding:
|
||||||||||||
Basic
|
29,805
|
28,542
|
28,142
|
|||||||||
Diluted
|
31,155
|
29,525
|
29,129
|
|||||||||
Dividends
declared
|
$ |
0.09
|
$ |
0.12
|
$ |
1.12
|
||||||
See accompanying notes.
F -
4
GAMCO INVESTORS,
INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
(In
thousands, except per share data)
|
December 31,
|
||||||||
2006
|
2007
|
|||||||
ASSETS
|
||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents, including restricted cash of $2,079
and $0, respectively
|
$ |
138,113
|
$ |
168,319
|
||||
Investments in securities, including restricted securities of
$52,116 and $0, respectively
|
507,595
|
394,977
|
||||||
Investments in partnerships and
affiliates
|
81,884
|
100,031
|
||||||
Receivable from
brokers
|
53,682
|
40,145
|
||||||
Investment advisory fees
receivable
|
31,094
|
33,701
|
||||||
Other receivables from
affiliates
|
9,902
|
7,126
|
||||||
Capital lease
|
1,459
|
1,213
|
||||||
Goodwill
|
3,523
|
3,467
|
||||||
Other assets
|
9,979
|
8,601
|
||||||
Total
assets
|
$ |
837,231
|
$ |
757,580
|
||||
LIABILITIES
AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
|
||||||||
Payable to brokers
|
$ |
36,345
|
$ |
7,562
|
||||
Income taxes payable
|
13,922
|
17,539
|
||||||
Capital lease obligation
|
2,781
|
2,525
|
||||||
Compensation payable
|
30,174
|
25,362
|
||||||
Securities sold, not yet purchased
|
8,244
|
2,229
|
||||||
Accrued expenses and other liabilities
|
41,053
|
38,810
|
||||||
Total operating
liabilities
|
132,519
|
94,027
|
||||||
5.5% Senior notes (due May 15, 2013)
|
100,000
|
100,000
|
||||||
6% Convertible note, $50 million outstanding (conversion
price, $53.00 per share; note due August 14, 2011)
|
49,504
|
49,608
|
||||||
5.22% Senior notes (due February 17,
2007)
|
82,308
|
-
|
||||||
Total liabilities
|
364,331
|
243,635
|
||||||
Minority interest
|
21,324
|
12,630
|
||||||
Stockholders' equity:
|
||||||||
Class A Common Stock, $.001 par value; 100,000,000
shares
|
||||||||
authorized; 12,055,872 and 12,574,995
shares issued, respectively;
7,487,018 and 7,819,741 shares
outstanding, respectively
|
12
|
12
|
||||||
Class B Common Stock, $.001 par value; 100,000,000
shares
|
||||||||
authorized; 24,000,000 shares issued
and 20,754,217 and
|
||||||||
20,626,644 shares outstanding,
respectively
|
21
|
21
|
||||||
Additional paid-in capital
|
229,699
|
230,483
|
||||||
Retained earnings
|
397,893
|
445,121
|
||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive gain
|
10,427
|
20,815
|
||||||
Treasury stock, class A, at cost (4,568,854 and
4,755,254 shares, respectively)
|
(186,476 | ) | (195,137 | ) | ||||
Total stockholders'
equity
|
451,576
|
501,315
|
||||||
Total liabilities and
stockholders' equity
|
$ |
837,231
|
$ |
757,580
|
||||
See accompanying notes.
F -
5
GAMCO INVESTORS,
INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
(In
thousands)
Common
Stock
|
Additional
Paid-in
Capital
|
Retained
Earnings
|
Accumulated
Other
Compre-hensive
(Loss) /
Gain
|
Treasury
Stock
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2004
|
$ |
31
|
$ |
161,053
|
$ |
268,341
|
$ |
(53
|
) | $ | (94,672 | ) | $ |
334,700
|
||||||||||
Comprehensive income:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income
|
-
|
-
|
63,941
|
-
|
-
|
63,941
|
||||||||||||||||||
Other comprehensive gain:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net unrealized gains on
securities
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
available for
sale, net of management
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
fees and income
tax expense of $438
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
564 |
-
|
564 | ||||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency translation | 15 | 15 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Total comprehensive income
|
64,520
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Dividends declared
|
-
|
-
|
(2,819 | ) |
-
|
-
|
(2,819 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Tender for employee stock options | (9,665 | ) | (9,665 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Stock based compensation expense
|
-
|
2,770
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
2,770
|
||||||||||||||||||
Exercise of stock options including tax
benefit
|
-
|
1,659 |
-
|
-
|
-
|
1,659
|
||||||||||||||||||
Proceeds from settlement of purchase
contracts
|
2
|
70,567
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
70,569
|
||||||||||||||||||
Capitalized costs
|
-
|
(31 | ) |
-
|
-
|
-
|
(31 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Purchase of treasury stock
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(37,201 | ) | (37,201 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2005
|
$ |
33
|
$ |
226,353
|
$ |
329,463
|
$ | 526 | $ | (131,873 | ) | $ |
424,502
|
|||||||||||
Comprehensive income:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net
income
|
-
|
-
|
71,927
|
-
|
-
|
71,927
|
||||||||||||||||||
Other comprehensive gain:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net unrealized gains on
securities
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
available for
sale, net of management
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
fees and income
tax expense of $7,649
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
9,834
|
-
|
9,834
|
||||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency
translation
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
67
|
-
|
67
|
||||||||||||||||||
Total comprehensive income
|
81,828
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Dividends declared
|
-
|
-
|
(3,413 | ) |
-
|
-
|
(3,413 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Discount on debt amendment
|
-
|
633 |
-
|
-
|
-
|
633 | ||||||||||||||||||
Excess tax benefit for exercised stock options | 1,782 | 1,782 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock based compensation expense
|
-
|
53
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
53
|
||||||||||||||||||
Exercise of stock options including tax
benefit
|
-
|
878
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
878
|
||||||||||||||||||
Capitalized costs
|
-
|
- |
(84
|
) |
-
|
-
|
(84 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Purchase of treasury stock
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(54,603 | ) | (54,603 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2006
|
$ |
33
|
$ |
229,699
|
$ |
397,893
|
$ |
10,427
|
$ | (186,476 | ) | $ |
451,576
|
|||||||||||
Cumulative effect of applying the provisions of FIN 48 at January 1, 2007 | (822 | ) | (822 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive income:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net
income
|
-
|
-
|
79,569
|
-
|
-
|
79,569
|
||||||||||||||||||
Other comprehensive gain:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net unrealized gains on
securities
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
available for
sale, net of management
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
fees and income
tax expense of $4,968
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
10,380
|
-
|
10,380
|
||||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency
translation
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
8
|
-
|
8
|
||||||||||||||||||
Total comprehensive income
|
89,957
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Dividends declared
|
-
|
-
|
(31,519 | ) |
-
|
-
|
(31,519 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Stock based compensation expense
|
-
|
483
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
483
|
||||||||||||||||||
Exercise of stock options including tax
benefit
|
-
|
301
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
301
|
||||||||||||||||||
Purchase of treasury stock
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(8,661 | ) | (8,661 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2007
|
$ |
33
|
$ |
230,483
|
$ |
445,121
|
$ |
20,815
|
$ | (195,137 | ) | $ |
501,315
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
F -
6
GAMCO INVESTORS,
INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)
Year ended December
31
|
||||||||||||
2005
|
2006
|
2007
|
||||||||||
Operating
activities
Net income
|
$ |
63,941
|
$ |
71,927
|
$ |
79,569
|
||||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash
provided by (used in) operating
activities:
|
||||||||||||
Equity in net gains from partnerships and
affiliates
|
(6,967 | ) | (7,427 | ) | (5,489 | ) | ||||||
Depreciation and
amortization
|
975
|
882
|
962
|
|||||||||
Stock based compensation
expense
|
2,770
|
53
|
483
|
|||||||||
Deferred income
tax
|
1,088 |
(7,129
|
) | 1,907 | ||||||||
Tax benefit from exercise of stock
options
|
328
|
191
|
62
|
|||||||||
Foreign currency
loss
|
191
|
67
|
8
|
|||||||||
Other-than-temporary loss on available for sale
securities
|
3,301
|
40
|
5,072
|
|||||||||
Impairment of
goodwill
|
1,127
|
-
|
56
|
|||||||||
Market value of donated
securities
|
-
|
331
|
273
|
|||||||||
Minority interest in net income of consolidated
subsidiaries
|
533
|
1,641
|
834
|
|||||||||
Realized gains on sales of available for sale
securities
|
(482 | ) | (621 | ) | (2,239 | ) | ||||||
Realized gains on sales of trading investments in
securities and
securities sold, not yet purchased, net
|
(10,676 | ) | (18,667 | ) | (16,816 | ) | ||||||
Change in unrealized value of trading investments
in securities and
securities sold, not yet purchased, net
|
(2,872 | ) | (2,035 | ) | 9,984 | |||||||
Amortization on discount on
debt
|
-
|
137
|
104
|
|||||||||
Excess tax benefit
adjustment
|
-
|
1,782
|
-
|
|||||||||
(Increase) decrease in operating assets:
|
||||||||||||
Purchases of trading investments
in
securities
|
(1,166,701 | ) | (1,021,339 | ) | (1,253,493 | ) | ||||||
Proceeds from sales of trading
investments in securities
|
1,057,733
|
995,435
|
1,364,328
|
|||||||||
Cost of covers | (4,648 | ) | (18,607 | ) | (118,530 | ) | ||||||
Proceeds from sales of securities sold, not yet purchased | 5,363 | 18,912 | 123,931 | |||||||||
Investments in partnerships and
affiliates
|
(15,969 | ) | (4,903 | ) | (17,998 | ) | ||||||
Distributions from partnerships
and
affiliates
|
37,448
|
14,615
|
17,229
|
|||||||||
Receivable from
brokers
|
(4,288 | ) | (42,052 | ) | 17,467 | |||||||
Investment advisory fees
receivable
|
(3,338 | ) |
(9,123
|
) | (2,532 | ) | ||||||
Other receivables from
affiliates
|
126
|
3,155
|
2,785
|
|||||||||
Other
assets
|
(755
|
) | (2,486 | ) | 609 | |||||||
Increase (decrease) in operating liabilities:
|
||||||||||||
Payable to
brokers
|
3,635 |
30,929
|
(27,304
|
) | ||||||||
Income taxes
payable
|
544 |
4,423
|
(2,076
|
) | ||||||||
Compensation
payable
|
159
|
1,344
|
(6,237
|
) | ||||||||
Accrued expenses and other
liabilities
|
(271 | ) | 22,769 |
(1,825
|
) | |||||||
Effects of consolidation of investment partnerships and
offshore funds consolidated
under FIN 46R and EITF 04-5:
|
||||||||||||
Realized gains on sales of investments in securities and
securities sold, not yet purchased, net
|
-
|
(12,522
|
) | (671 | ) | |||||||
Change in unrealized value of investments in securities and
securities sold, not yet purchased, net
|
-
|
(5,627
|
) | 927 | ||||||||
Equity in net gains from partnerships and affiliates
|
-
|
(885
|
) | (1,116 | ) | |||||||
Purchases of trading investments in securities and securities
sold short
|
-
|
(675,519
|
) | (49,774 | ) | |||||||
Proceeds from sales of trading investments in securities and
securities sold short
|
-
|
652,880
|
55,853
|
|||||||||
Investments in partnerships and affiliates
|
-
|
(2,004
|
) | (2,000 | ) | |||||||
Distributions from partnerships and affiliates
|
-
|
380
|
5,589
|
|||||||||
Decrease (increase) in investment advisory fees
receivable
|
-
|
127
|
(75
|
) | ||||||||
Increase in receivable from brokers
|
-
|
(9,290
|
) | (3,930 | ) | |||||||
Decrease in other assets
|
-
|
441
|
39
|
|||||||||
Increase (decrease) in payable to brokers
|
-
|
7,263
|
(1,480
|
) | ||||||||
(Decrease) increase in accrued expenses and other
liabilities
|
-
|
(11,643
|
) | 174 | ||||||||
Income related to investment partnerships and offshore
funds
consolidated under FIN 46R and EITF 04-5,
net
|
-
|
16,447
|
603
|
|||||||||
Total
adjustments
|
(94,970 | ) | (77,635 | ) | 95,694 | |||||||
Net cash (used in) provided by operating
activities
|
(31,029 | ) | (5,708 | ) | 175,263 |
F -
7
GAMCO INVESTORS,
INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)
Year
ended December 31
|
|||
2005
|
2006
|
2007
|
Investing
activities
|
||||||||||||
Purchases of available for sale
securities
|
(9,290 | ) | (5,434 | ) | (26,376 | ) | ||||||
Proceeds from sales of available for sale
securities
|
2,085
|
2,766
|
5,195
|
|||||||||
Net cash used in investing
activities
|
(7,205 | ) | (2,668 | ) | (21,181 | ) | ||||||
Financing
activities
|
||||||||||||
Dividend paid to minority stockholders of subsidiary
|
(507 | ) | (795 | ) | (441 | ) | ||||||
Payoff of 5.22% Senior Notes | (82,308 | ) | ||||||||||
Contributions related to investment partnerships and offshore
funds
consolidated under FIN 46R and EITF
04-5,
net
|
-
|
29,734
|
(1,199
|
) | ||||||||
Proceeds from exercise of stock
options
|
1,331
|
687
|
238
|
|||||||||
Repurchase of 5.5% convertible
note
|
(50,000
|
) | - |
-
|
||||||||
Dividends
paid
|
(20,122 | ) | (3,413 | ) | (31,519 | ) | ||||||
Proceeds from the settlement of purchase
contracts
|
70,569
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||
Tender for employee stock
options
|
(9,665
|
) | - |
-
|
||||||||
Capitalized
costs
|
(31 | ) | - |
-
|
||||||||
Purchase of treasury
stock
|
(37,201 | ) | (54,603 | ) | (8,661 | ) | ||||||
Net cash used in financing
activities
|
(45,626 | ) | (28,390 | ) | (123,890 | ) | ||||||
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash
equivalents
|
(83,860 | ) | (36,766 | ) | 30,192 | |||||||
Net increase in cash from partnerships and offshore funds
consolidated
under FIN 46R and EITF 04-5
|
-
|
1,754
|
-
|
|||||||||
Effect of exchange rates on cash and cash equivalents
|
(75
|
) | (36 | ) | 14 | |||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of
year
|
257,096
|
173,161
|
138,113
|
|||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of
year
|
$ |
173,161
|
$ |
138,113
|
$ |
168,319
|
||||||
Supplemental
disclosures of cash flow information
Cash paid for
interest
|
$ |
14,692
|
$ |
13,019
|
$ |
15,116
|
||||||
Cash paid for income
taxes
|
$ |
36,779
|
$ |
46,314
|
$ |
49,763
|
||||||
See accompanying notes.
F -
8
A. Significant Accounting
Policies
Basis of
Presentation
GAMCO Investors, Inc. (“GBL” or the “Company”) was incorporated in
April 1998 in the state of New York, with no significant assets or liabilities
and did not engage in any substantial business activities prior to the initial
public offering (“Offering”) of our shares. On February 9, 1999, we exchanged 24
million shares of our class B common stock, representing all of our then issued
and outstanding common stock, with Gabelli Funds, Inc. (“GFI”) and two of its
subsidiaries in consideration for substantially all of the operating assets and
liabilities of GFI, relating to its institutional and retail asset management,
mutual fund advisory, underwriting and brokerage business (the
“Reorganization”). GBL distributed net assets and liabilities,
principally a proprietary investment portfolio, of approximately $165 million,
including cash of $18 million, which has been recorded for accounting purposes
as a deemed distribution to GFI. GFI, which was renamed Gabelli Group
Capital Partners, Inc. in 1999, is the parent of GBL and was renamed GGCP, Inc.
(“GGCP”) during 2005.
On February 17, 1999, we completed our sale of 6 million shares of
class A common stock in the Offering and received proceeds, after fees and
expenses, of approximately $96 million. Immediately after the
Offering, GFI owned 80% of the outstanding common stock of GBL and as of
December 31, 2007 their ownership is 71.8%. In addition, with the
completion of the Offering, we became a “C” Corporation for federal and state
income tax purposes and are subject to substantially higher income tax
rates. Our corporate name change to GAMCO Investors, Inc. became
effective August 29, 2005.
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the
assets, liabilities and earnings of:
·
|
GBL;
and
|
·
|
Our wholly-owned
subsidiaries: Gabelli Funds, LLC (“Funds Advisor”), GAMCO Asset Management
Inc. (“GAMCO”), GAMCO Asset Management (UK) Limited, Gabelli Arbitrage
Holdings LLC, Gabelli Trading Holdings LLC, Gabelli Fixed Income,
Inc. (“Fixed Income”) and its
subsidiaries;
|
·
|
Our majority-owned
or majority-controlled subsidiaries: Gabelli Securities, Inc. (“GSI”) and
its subsidiaries and Teton Advisors, Inc. (“Teton”, formerly Gabelli
Advisers, Inc. until January 24, 2008);
and
|
·
|
Certain investment
partnerships ("Investment Partnerships") and offshore funds in which we
have a direct or indirect controlling financial interest as required by
FIN 46R
"Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities" and EITF 04-5 "Determining
Whether a General Partner, or the General Partners as a Group, Controls a
Limited Partnership or Similar Entity When the Limited Partners Have
Certain Rights". Please see Note C included
herein.
|
At December 31, 2005, 2006, and 2007 we owned approximately 92%
of GSI and had a 51% voting interest in Teton (42% economic
interest). The consolidated financial statements comprise the
financial statements of GBL and its subsidiaries as of December 31 of each
year. The financial statements of the subsidiaries are prepared for
the same reporting year as the parent company, using consistent accounting
policies. All significant intercompany transactions and balances have
been eliminated. Subsidiaries are fully consolidated from the date of
acquisition, being the date on which GBL obtains control, and continue to be
consolidated until the date that such control ceases.
Use of
Estimates
The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in
conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires
management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in
the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual
results could differ from those estimates.
Nature of
Operations
GAMCO, Funds Advisor, Gabelli Fixed Income LLC (“Fixed Income LLC”),
a wholly-owned subsidiary of Fixed Income, Teton and GSI (effective January 19,
2006) are registered investment advisors under the Investment Advisers Act of
1940. Gabelli & Company, Inc. (“Gabelli & Company”), a wholly-owned
subsidiary of GSI is a registered broker-dealer with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) and is regulated by the Financial
Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”). Gabelli & Company acts as an
introducing broker, and all transactions for its customers are cleared through
the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) member firms on a fully-disclosed basis.
Accordingly, open customer transactions are not reflected in the accompanying
consolidated statements of financial condition. Gabelli & Company
is exposed to credit losses on these open positions in the event of
nonperformance by its customers, pursuant to conditions of its clearing
agreements with its clearing brokers. This exposure is reduced by the
clearing brokers' policy of obtaining and maintaining adequate collateral and
credit of the counterparties until the open transaction is completed. Refer to
Major Revenue-Generating Services and Revenue Recognition section within Note A
for additional discussion of GBL's business.
F -
9
Gabelli Direct, Inc. (“Gabelli Direct”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of
GSI, and Gabelli Fixed Income Distributors, Inc. (“Fixed Income Distributors”),
a wholly-owned subsidiary of Fixed Income LLC, were voluntarily deregistered as
broker-dealers with the SEC and thus ceased to be regulated by the National
Association of Securities Dealers (a predecessor firm of FINRA) in October 2006
and January 2007, respectively.
Cash and Cash
Equivalents
Cash equivalents primarily consist of affiliated money market mutual
funds which are highly liquid. At
December 31, 2006, approximately $2.1 million of cash and cash equivalents
was held as part of the collateral to secure a $51.3 million letter of credit
originally issued on August 14, 2002, in favor of the holder of the 6%
convertible note, and this amount was disclosed as restricted cash on the
consolidated statements of financial condition. The $51.3 million
letter of credit expired on December 24, 2007.
Securities
Transactions
Investments in securities are accounted for as either “trading
securities” or “available for sale” and are stated at quoted market values.
Securities that are not readily marketable are stated at their estimated fair
values as determined by our management. The resulting unrealized gains and
losses for trading securities are included in net gain from investments, and the
unrealized gains and losses for available for sale securities, net of management
fees and tax, are reported as a separate component of stockholders’
equity. Securities transactions and any related gains and losses are
recorded on a trade date basis. Realized gains and losses from securities
transactions are recorded on the identified cost basis and are included in net
gain from investments.
At December 31, 2006, approximately $52.1 million of investments
in securities were held as collateral to secure a $51.3 million letter of credit
originally issued on August 14, 2002 in favor of the holder of the 6%
convertible note, and this amount is disclosed as restricted investments in
securities on the consolidated statements of financial condition. The
$51.3 million letter of credit expired on December 24, 2007, and therefore there
are no collateral or restricted securities at December 31, 2007.
Securities sold, but not yet purchased are recorded at trade date,
and are stated at quoted market values and represent obligations of GBL to
purchase the securities at prevailing market prices. Therefore, the future
satisfaction of such obligations may be for an amount greater or less than the
amounts recorded on the consolidated statements of financial
condition. The ultimate gains or losses recognized are dependent upon
the prices at which these securities are purchased to settle the obligations
under the sales commitments.
Investments in
Partnerships and Affiliates
Investments in partnerships and affiliates, whose underlying assets
consist mainly of marketable securities, are accounted for as consolidated
subsidiaries or equity investments in accordance with FIN 46R and EITF 04-5
effective as January 1, 2006. Please refer to Note C included herein. Prior to
January 1, 2006, Investments in Partnerships and Affiliates were accounted for
using the equity method under which our share of net earnings or losses of these
partnerships and affiliated entities was reflected in income as earned, capital
contributions were recorded as investments when paid, and distributions received
were reductions of the investments. Depending on the terms of the
investment, the Company may be restricted as to the timing and amounts of
withdrawals.
Receivables from
and Payables to Brokers
Receivables from and payables to brokers consist of amounts arising
primarily from the purchases and sales of securities.
Major
Revenue-Generating Services and Revenue Recognition
The
Company’s revenues are derived primarily from investment advisory and incentive
fees, commissions and distribution fees.
Investment
advisory and incentive fees are directly influenced by the level and mix of
assets under management ("AUM") as fees are derived from a
contractually-determined percentage of AUM for each account as well as fulcrum
fees earned on certain accounts. Advisory fees from the open-end
mutual funds, closed-end funds and sub-advisory accounts are computed daily or
weekly based on average net assets and amounts receivable are included in
investment advisory fees receivable in the consolidated statements of financial
condition. Advisory fees from separate accounts ("Separate Accounts")
are generally computed quarterly based on account values as of the end of the
preceding quarter and accrued monthly, and amounts receivable are included in
investment advisory fees receivable in the consolidated statements of financial
condition. Management fees from Investment Partnerships are computed
either monthly or quarterly and accrued monthly, and amounts receivable are
included in other receivables from affiliates in the consolidated statements of
financial condition. The Company derives approximately 86% of its total revenues
from advisory and management fees. These revenues vary depending upon the level
of sales compared with redemptions, financial market conditions and the fee
structure for AUM. Revenues derived from the equity-oriented portfolios
generally have higher management fee rates than fixed income
portfolios.
Revenues
from investment partnerships also generally include an incentive allocation or a
fee of 20% of the economic profit. The incentive allocation or fee is
generally based on the absolute gain in a portfolio and is recognized at the end
of the measurement period, and amounts receivable are included in other
receivables from affiliates in the consolidated statements of financial
condition. There were $6.6 and $2.8 million in incentive allocations
or fees receivable as of December 31, 2006 and 2007,
respectively. The Company also receives fulcrum fees from certain
institutional separate accounts, which are based upon meeting or exceeding
specific benchmark index or indices. These fees are recognized at the end of the
stipulated contract period for the respective account, and receivables due from
fulcrum fees earned are included in investment advisory fees receivable on the
consolidated statements of financial condition. There was $4.4 and
$5.1 million in fulcrum fees receivable as of December 31, 2006 and 2007,
respectively. Management fees on a majority of the closed-end
preferred shares are received at year-end if the total return to common
shareholders of the closed-end fund for the calendar year exceeds the dividend
rate of the preferred shares. These fees are recognized at the end of
the measurement period. Receivables due on management fees on
closed-end preferred shares are included in investment advisory fees receivable
on the consolidated statements of financial condition. There were $10.5 and
$10.1 million in management fees receivable on closed-end preferred shares as of
December 31, 2006 and 2007, respectively.
Gabelli
& Company, Inc., a subsidiary of GBL, generates brokerage commission
revenues and related clearing charges on a trade-date basis from securities
transactions executed on an agency basis on behalf of institutional clients and
mutual funds, private wealth management clients and retail customers of
affiliate companies. It is also involved in syndicated underwriting
activities. It participates in syndicated underwritings of public
equity and debt offerings managed by major investment banks. It provides
institutional investors and investment partnerships with investment ideas on
numerous industries and special situations, with a particular focus on small-cap
and mid-cap companies. The team
of sell-side analysts follow economic sectors on a global basis, and are
bottom-up stock pickers, recommending companies that trade at significant
differences to Private Market Value (“PMV”). PMV investing is a
disciplined, research-driven approach based on the extensive use of security
analysis. In this process, it carefully selects stocks whose
intrinsic value, based on its estimate of current asset value and future growth
and earnings power, is significantly different from the value as reflected in
the public market. It then calculates the firm’s PMV, which is
defined as the price an informed industrial buyer would by likely to pay to
acquire the business. The research focuses on company fundamentals,
cash flow statistics, and catalysts that will help realize
returns. Commissions revenue and related clearing charges are
recorded on a trade-date basis.
Distribution
fees revenues are derived primarily from the distribution of Gabelli mutual
funds (“Funds”) advised by two subsidiaries of GBL, Funds Advisor and
Teton. Another GBL subsidiary, Gabelli & Company, distributes our
open-end Funds pursuant to distribution agreements with each
Fund. Under each distribution agreement with an open-end Fund,
Gabelli & Company offers and sells such open-end Fund shares on a continuous
basis and pays all of the costs of marketing and selling the shares, including
printing and mailing prospectuses and sales literature, advertising and
maintaining sales and customer service personnel and sales and services
fulfillment systems, and payments to the sponsors of Third-Party Distribution
Programs, financial intermediaries and Gabelli & Company’s sales
personnel. Gabelli & Company receives fees for such services
pursuant to distribution plans adopted under provisions of Rule 12b-1 (“12b-1”)
of the Investment Company Act. Gabelli & Company is the principal
underwriter for funds distributed in multiple classes of shares which carry
either a front-end or back-end sales charge.
Under the
distribution plans, the open-end Class AAA shares of the Funds (except The
Gabelli US Treasury Money Market Fund, Gabelli Capital Asset Fund and The
Gabelli ABC Fund) and the Class A shares of various Funds pay Gabelli &
Company a distribution or service fee of .25% per year (except the Class A
shares of the Westwood Funds which pay .50% per year) on the average daily net
assets of the fund. Class B and Class C shares have a 12b-1 distribution plan
with a service and distribution fee totaling 1%. Gabelli &
Company’s distribution agreements with the Funds may continue in effect from
year to year only if specifically approved at least annually by (i) the Fund's
Board of Directors or Trustees or (ii) the Fund's shareholders and, in either
case, the vote of a majority of the Fund's directors or trustees who are not
parties to the agreement or "interested persons" of any such party, within the
meaning of the Investment Company Act. Each Fund may terminate its distribution
agreement, or any agreement thereunder, at any time upon 60 days' written notice
by (i) a vote of the majority of its directors or trustees cast in person at a
meeting called for the purpose of voting on such termination or (ii) a vote at a
meeting of shareholders of the lesser of either 67% of the voting shares
represented in person or by proxy or 50% of the outstanding voting shares of
such Fund. Each distribution agreement automatically terminates in the event of
its assignment, as defined in the Investment Company Act. Gabelli
& Company may terminate a distribution agreement without penalty upon 60
days' written notice.
F -
10
Distribution
fees from the open-end mutual funds are computed daily based on average net
assets and are accrued monthly. The amounts receivable for distribution fees are
included in other receivables from affiliates on the consolidated statements of
financial condition.
Finally,
GBL also has investment income generated from its proprietary trading
activities.
GBL’s
principal market is in the United States. In 2007, the GBL opened a
research office in Shanghai, China and another in Singapore in early 2008 and
will continue to evaluate adding additional research offices throughout the
world.
Distribution
Costs
We incur certain promotion and distribution costs, which are expensed
as incurred, principally related to the sale of shares of open-end mutual funds,
shares sold in the initial public offerings of our closed-end funds, and
after-market support services related to our closed-end
funds. Distribution costs relating to closed-end funds were
approximately $5,576,000, $8,217,000 and $7,467,000 for 2005, 2006 and 2007,
respectively. In fourth quarter 2006, we made a prepayment of $4.2
million in distribution expenses to a broker in connection with the termination
of certain after-market support services related to the common share assets of
The Gabelli Dividend and Income Trust which is included in distribution costs on
the consolidated statement of income. During
the second quarter of 2007, we made a prepayment of $4.2 million in connection
with the termination of certain after-market support services related to
the common share assets of the Gabelli Global Deal Fund which is included in
distribution costs on the consolidated statement of income.
Dividends and
Interest Income and Interest Expense
Dividends are recorded on the ex-dividend date. Interest income
and interest expense are accrued as earned or incurred.
Depreciation and
Amortization
Fixed assets other than leasehold improvements, with net book value
of $0.7 and $0.6 million at December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively, which
are included in other assets, are recorded at cost and depreciated using the
straight-line method over their estimated useful lives. Leasehold improvements,
with net book value of $2.1 and $2.6 million at December 31, 2007 and 2006,
respectively, which are included in other assets, are recorded at cost and
amortized using the straight-line method over their estimated useful lives or
lease terms, whichever is shorter. Amortization of the capital lease
obligation is computed on the interest rate method while the leased property is
depreciated utilizing the straight-line method over the term of the lease, which
expires on April 30, 2013.
Derivative
Financial Instruments
The Company accounts for derivative financial instruments in
accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 133
(“Statement No. 133”), Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities, as amended. Statement No. 133 requires that an entity recognize all
derivatives, as defined, as either assets or liabilities measured at fair value.
The Company uses swaps and treasury futures to manage its exposure to market and
credit risks from changes in certain equity prices, interest rates, and
volatility and does not hold or issue swaps and treasury futures for speculative
or trading purposes. These swaps and treasury futures are not designated as
hedges, and changes in fair values of these derivatives are included in net gain
from investments in the consolidated statements of income. The unrealized change
in fair value of swaps and treasury futures are included in the investments in
securities in the consolidated statements of financial condition. The
notional value of derivatives at December 31, 2007 and 2006 was $4.4 and $19.2
million, respectively.
F -
11
Goodwill
Prior to the issuance of SFAS No. 142, "Goodwill and Other
Intangible Assets" (SFAS No. 142"), goodwill and other long-lived intangible
assets were amortized each year. The adoption of SFAS No. 142 at the
beginning of 2002 eliminated the amortization of these assets and established
requirements for having them tested for impairment at least
annually.
There was
an impairment charge of $56,000 recorded for the year ended December 31, 2007 as
a result of the voluntary deregistration of an inactive broker dealer
subsidiary.
At November 30, 2006 and November 30, 2007, management conducted its
annual assessments and assessed the recoverability of goodwill and determined
that there was no further impairment of the remaining goodwill on GBL’s
consolidated financial statements. In assessing the recoverability of
goodwill, projections regarding estimated future cash flows and other factors
are made to determine the fair value of the respective assets. If
these estimates or related projections change in the future, it may result in an
impairment charge for these assets to income.
Income
Taxes
In June
2006, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in
Income Taxes” (“FIN 48”), which is an interpretation of FAS 109, "Accounting For
Income Taxes". This interpretation prescribes a recognition threshold and
measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of
a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. The Company
adopted this interpretation on January 1, 2007. The cumulative effect of
applying the provisions of FIN 48 at January 1, 2007 was an adjustment to
beginning retained earnings of $0.8 million.
In May
2007, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position ("FSP") FIN 48-1, “Definition of
Settlement in FASB Interpretation No. 48”, amending FIN 48 to clarify that a tax
position could be effectively settled upon examination by a taxing authority. We
have updated our schedule of uncertain tax positions and the impact of taxes,
interest, and penalties has been reflected within our income tax provision and
disclosed within our footnotes to the consolidated financial
statements.
Income tax expense is based on pre-tax financial accounting income, including adjustments made for the recognition or derecognition related to uncertain tax positions. The recognition or derecognition of income tax expense related to uncertain tax positions is determined under the guidance as prescribed by FIN 48 and FSP FIN 48-1. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to be recovered or concluded. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in earnings in the period that includes the enactment date.
Minority
Interest
For the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2007, minority interest on
the consolidated statements of income represents income attributable to the
minority stockholders of GSI and Teton, as well as for certain
investment partnerships and offshore funds that are consolidated as required by
FIN 46R and EITF 04-5. For the year ended December 31, 2005, minority
interest on the consolidated statements of income represents income attributable
to the minority stockholders of GSI, Teton and Fixed Income. The minority
stockholders of Teton and Fixed Income are principally employees, officers and
directors of GBL.
As of December 31, 2007 and 2006, minority interest on the
consolidated statements of financial condition represents amounts attributable
to the minority stockholders of GSI and Teton, as well as amounts attributable
to the other investors of certain investment partnerships and offshore funds
that are consolidated as required by FIN 46R and EITF 04-5.
Fair Values of
Financial Instruments
The carrying amount of all assets and liabilities, other than
goodwill, capital lease, fixed assets, leasehold improvements, and certain other
assets in the consolidated statements of financial condition approximate their
fair values.
Earnings Per
Share
Net income per share is computed in accordance with SFAS No. 128,
“Earnings Per Share”. Basic net income per common share is calculated by
dividing net income applicable to common stockholders by the weighted average
number of shares of common stock outstanding during the year.
F -
12
Diluted net income per share, in addition to the weighted average
number of shares determined for basic net income per share, includes common
stock equivalents which would arise from the exercise of stock options and from
the vesting of unvested restricted stock awards using the treasury stock method
and, if dilutive, assumes the conversion of our convertible note for the period
outstanding since its issuance in August 2001. An average of 151,000,
29,000 and 42,000 incremental shares were included as the dilutive effect of
stock options and restricted stock awards ("RSA's") in 2005, 2006 and 2007,
respectively. RSA's only affect the 2007 weighted average shares as
they were granted to employees of the Company on December 7, 2007. The
allocation of these RSA's was recommended by Mario J. Gabelli ("Mr. Gabelli" or
"Chairman") who did not receive an RSA award. In 2005, net income is adjusted
for interest expense, net of management fees and taxes, of $1,758,000 and the
weighted average shares outstanding includes 1,199,000 incremental shares as the
convertible note had a dilutive effect. In 2006, net income is
adjusted for interest expense, net of management fees and taxes, of $1,489,000
and the weighted average shares outstanding includes 956,000 incremental shares
as the convertible note had a dilutive effect. In 2007, net income is adjusted
for interest expense, net of management fees and taxes, of $1,715,000 and the
weighted average shares outstanding includes 943,000 incremental shares as the
convertible note had a dilutive effect.
Management
Fee
Management fee expense is incentive-based and entirely variable compensation in the amount of 10% of the aggregate pre-tax profits which is paid to Mr. Gabelli for acting as CEO pursuant to his amended Employment Agreement so long as he is an executive of GBL and devoting the substantial majority of his working time to the business. In accordance with his amended employment agreement, he has allocated $1.5 million of his management fee to certain other employees of the Company in 2007.
Stock Based
Compensation
We maintain two Stock Award and Incentive Plans (the “Plans”)
approved by the shareholders, which are designed to provide incentives which
will attract and retain individuals key to the success of GBL through direct or
indirect ownership of our common stock. The Plans were previously adopted and
approved by our shareholders as a means to attract, retain and motivate
employees. Effective January 1, 2003, we adopted the fair value recognition
provisions of SFAS No. 123 “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation” in
accordance with the transition and disclosure provisions under the recently
issued SFAS No. 148, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation – Transition and
Disclosure.” Previously we had elected to use the intrinsic value
method prescribed in Accounting Principles Board (“APB”) Opinion No. 25,
“Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees” and related
interpretations. Accordingly, no compensation expense was recognized
where the exercise price equaled or exceeded the market price of the underlying
stock on the date of grant. We adopted Statement 123 (R) “Share-Based
Payment” (“Statement 123 (R)”) on January 1, 2005. In light of our
modified prospective adoption of the fair value recognition provisions of
Statement 123 (R) for all grants of employee stock options, the adoption of
Statement 123 (R) did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial
statements. In 2005, 2006 and 2007, we have recognized a total of
$2,770,000, $53,000 and $417,000, respectively, in stock-based compensation
expense. We expense stock option compensation over the vesting period
of the option in line with the vesting characteristics. For RSA's,
the grant
date fair value is $63.50 per share which was the closing share price of GBL
shares on December 20, 2007, the effective grant date under Statement
123(R) and FSP 123(R)-2 for purposes of calculation of the compensation
expense. This expense will be recognized over the vesting period for these
awards, 30% over three years and 70% over 5 years. Refer
also to Note F.
Concentration
of Credit Risk
Financial
instruments that potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit
risk consist primarily of cash and cash equivalents held. The Company
maintains cash and cash equivalents primarily in the Gabelli U.S. Treasury Money
Market Fund, which invests fully in instruments issued by the U.S. government,
and to a much lesser extent with various financial institutions, where these
balances may sometimes exceed the federally insured limit. The
concentration of credit risk with respect to advisory fees receivable is
generally limited due to the short payment terms extended to clients by the
Company. In addition, the credit risk is further limited by virtue of
the fact that no single advisory relationship provided over 10 percent of the
total revenue of the Company during the years 2007, 2006, or 2005.
Business
Segments
We operate predominantly in one business segment, the investment
advisory and asset management business. We conduct our investment
advisory business principally through: GAMCO (Separate Accounts), Funds Advisor
(Mutual Funds) and GSI (Investment Partnerships). We also act as an
underwriter, are a distributor of our open-end mutual funds and provide
institutional research through Gabelli & Company, our broker-dealer
subsidiary.
Reclassifications
Certain prior period amounts reflect reclassifications to conform
with the current year’s presentation. We have reclassified distributions from
mutual funds, categorized as either short-term or long-term capital gains, to
interest and dividend income from net gain from investments for 2005 and 2006 of
$1.7 and $6.1 million, respectively. In addition, we have reclassified
approximately $3.5 million between income taxes payable and deferred income tax
on the consolidated statements of cash flows for 2006.
F -
13
Recent
Accounting Developments
In
February 2006, the FASB issued FASB Statement No. 155, “Accounting for Certain
Hybrid Financial Instruments – an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133 and 140,”
(“Statement 155”) that amends FASB Statements No. 133 “Accounting for Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities,” (“Statement 133”) and No. 140 “Accounting
for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of
Liabilities a replacement of FASB Statement 125” (“Statement
140”). The statement permits fair value remeasurement for any hybrid
financial instrument that contains an embedded derivative that otherwise would
require bifurcation; clarifies which interest-only strips and principal-only
strips are not subject to the requirements of Statement 133; establishes a
requirement to evaluate interests in securitized financial assets to identify
interests that are freestanding derivatives or that are hybrid financial
instruments that contain an embedded derivative requiring bifurcation; clarifies
that concentrations of credit risk in the form of subordination are not embedded
derivatives; amends Statement 140 to eliminate the prohibition on a qualifying
special-purpose entity from holding a derivative financial instrument that
pertains to a beneficial interest other than another derivative financial
instrument. Statement 155 does not permit prior period
restatement. The statement is effective for all financial instruments
acquired or issued after the beginning of an entity’s first fiscal year that
begins after September 15, 2006. The Company adopted this statement
on January 1, 2007. The impact of adopting this statement has been
immaterial to the Company’s consolidated financial
statements.
In
April 2006, the FASB issued FSP FIN 46R-6 “Determining the Variability to be
Considered in Applying FASB Interpretation No. 46R” (“FIN
46-R-6”). FIN 46-R-6 addresses certain major implementation issues
related to FIN 46R, specifically how a reporting enterprise should determine the
variability to be considered in applying FIN 46R. FIN 46-R-6 is effective as of
the beginning of the first day of the first reporting period beginning after
September 15, 2006. The Company adopted this Statement on January 1,
2007. The impact of adopting this statement has been immaterial to
the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
In
September 2006, the FASB issued FASB Statement No. 157, “Fair Value
Measurements” (“Statement 157”). The statement provides guidance for using fair
value to measure assets and liabilities. The statement provides guidance to
companies about the extent of which to measure assets and liabilities at fair
value, the information used to measure fair value, and the effect of fair value
measurements on earnings. The statement applies whenever other standards require
(or permit) assets or liabilities to be measured at fair value. The statement
does not expand the use of fair value in any new circumstances. The statement is
effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after
November 15, 2007 and for interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company
plans to adopt this statement on January 1, 2008. The impact of adopting
Statement 157 is expected to be immaterial to the Company’s consolidated
financial statements.
In
September 2006, the SEC released Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 108, "Considering
the Effects of Prior Year Misstatements when Quantifying Misstatements in
Current Year Financial Statements" (the “SAB”). The SAB addresses diversity in
how companies consider and resolve the quantitative effect of financial
statement misstatements. The SAB is effective as of the beginning
of the first day of the first reporting period beginning after
November 15, 2006. The Company adopted this SAB on January 1,
2007. The impact of adopting this SAB has been immaterial to the
Company’s consolidated financial statements.
In
February 2007, the FASB issued FASB Statement No. 159, “The Fair Value
Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities – Including an Amendment
of FASB Statement No. 115,” (“Statement 159”), which provides companies with an
option to report selected financial assets and liabilities at fair value. The
standard’s objective is to reduce both the complexity in accounting for
financial instruments and the volatility in earnings caused by measuring related
assets and liabilities differently. Statement 159 also establishes presentation
and disclosure requirements designed to facilitate comparisons between companies
that choose different measurement attributes for similar types of assets and
liabilities. This statement is effective as of the beginning of an
entity’s first fiscal year beginning after November 15, 2007. The Company
plans to adopt this statement on January 1, 2008. The impact of
adopting Statement 159 is expected to be immaterial to the Company’s
consolidated financial statements. The impact of adopting Statement 159 is
expected to be immaterial to the Company’s consolidated financial statements
because the Company has not elected to report selected financial assets and
liabilities at fair value.
In
June 2007, the FASB issued Emerging Issues Task Force 06-11, "Accounting
for Income Tax Benefits of Dividends on Share-Based Payment
Awards". The
EITF release discusses how an entity should recognize the income tax benefit
received on dividends that are (a) paid to employees holding equity-classified
nonvested shares, equity-classified nonvested share units, or equity-classified
outstanding share options and (b) charged to retained earnings under FAS
123(R).The
release became relevant to the Company after the Board of Directors authorized
the issuance of restricted stock awards (share based payments) to Company
employees in December 2007. Employees
of the Company who received shares in the 2007 granting of restricted stock
awards are not entitled to receive dividends on their unvested shares.
Therefore, the release does not have any financial impact on the Company for the
year ended December 31,
2007.
In
December 2007, the FASB issued FASB Statement No. 160, "Noncontrolling
Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements, an
Amendment of ARB No. 51" ("Statement 160") to
improve the relevance, comparability, and transparency of the financial
information that a reporting entity with minority interests provides in its
consolidated financial statements. Statement
160 changes the way the consolidated income statement is presented. It requires
consolidated net income to be reported at amounts that include the amounts
attributable to both the parent and the noncontrolling interest. It also
requires disclosure, on the face of the consolidated statement of income, of the
amounts of consolidated
net income attributable to the parent and to the noncontrolling interest.
Statement
160 requires expanded disclosures in the consolidated financial statements that
clearly identify and distinguish between the interests of the parent’s owners
and the interests of the noncontrolling owners of a subsidiary. Statement 160
does not change the provisions of “Consolidation
of Variable Interest Entities—An Interpretation of Accounting Research
Bulletin No. 51” ("ARB 51") related to consolidation purpose
or consolidation policy or the requirement that a parent consolidate
all entities in which it has a controlling financial interest. Statement 160
does, however, amend certain of ARB 51’s consolidation procedures to make them
consistent with the requirements of FASB Statement 141(R) "Business
Combinations". It also amends ARB 51 to provide definitions for certain terms
and to clarify some terminology. This
Statement is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal
years, beginning on or after December 15, 2008. Earlier adoption is
prohibited. The Company plans to adopt this statement on January 1, 2009.
Statement 160 will impact the Company's consolidated financial statements
presentation and disclosure of minority
interest.
F -
14
B. Investments in
Securities
Investments in securities at December 31, 2006 and 2007 consisted of
the following:
2006
|
2007
|
|||||||||||||||
Cost
|
Fair
Value
|
Cost
|
Fair
Value
|
|||||||||||||
(In
thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||
Trading
securities:
|
||||||||||||||||
U.S. Government
obligations
|
$ |
161,578
|
$ |
164,532
|
$ |
116,007
|
$ |
117,502
|
||||||||
Corporate bonds
|
57,786
|
59,522
|
-
|
-
|
||||||||||||
Common
stocks
|
98,383
|
106,175
|
91,892
|
95,163
|
||||||||||||
Mutual
funds
|
72,695
|
71,413
|
49,703
|
47,089
|
||||||||||||
Preferred
stocks
|
3,511
|
3,605
|
-
|
-
|
||||||||||||
Other investments
|
526
|
383
|
572
|
688
|
||||||||||||
Total trading
securities
|
394,479
|
405,630
|
258,174
|
260,442
|
||||||||||||
Available for sale
securities:
|
||||||||||||||||
Common
stocks
|
21,979
|
29,081
|
21,061
|
44,857
|
||||||||||||
Mutual
funds
|
60,422
|
72,884
|
79,688
|
89,678
|
||||||||||||
Total available for
sale securities
|
82,401
|
101,965
|
100,749
|
134,535
|
||||||||||||
Total investments in
securities
|
$ |
476,880
|
$ |
507,595
|
$ |
358,923
|
$ |
394,977
|
||||||||
The
aggregate fair value of available for sale securities at December 31, 2006 and
2007 was $102.0 million and $134.5 million, respectively. The total
unrealized gains for securities with net unrealized gains was $19.6 million and
$34.2 million at December 31, 2006 and 2007, respectively, while the total
unrealized losses for securities with net unrealized losses was $0.1 million and
$0.3 million, respectively.
Investments
classified as available for sale at December 31, 2006 and 2007 that are in an
unrealized loss position for which other-than-temporary impairment has not been
recognized consisted of the following:
2006
|
2007 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Cost
|
Unrealized
Losses
|
Fair
Value
|
Cost
|
Unrealized
Losses
|
Fair
Value
|
|||||||||||||||||||
(In
thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mutual
funds
|
$ | 1,174 | $ | (59 | ) | $ | 1,115 | $ | 4,163 | $ | (336 | ) | $ | 3,827 | ||||||||||
Total
available for sale securities in unrealized loss
positions
|
$ | 1,174 | $ | (59 | ) | $ | 1,115 | $ | 4,163 | $ | (336 | ) | $ | 3,827 |
Securities sold, not yet purchased at December 31, 2006 and 2007 consisted
of the following:
2006 | 2007 | |||||||||||||||
Cost
|
Fair
Value
|
Cost
|
Fair
Value
|
|||||||||||||
(In
thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||
Corporate bonds | $ | 1,612 | $ | 2,036 | $ | - | $ | - | ||||||||
Common stocks | 5,335 | 5,970 | 1,836 | 1,798 | ||||||||||||
Mutual funds | - | - | 553 | 427 | ||||||||||||
Other investments | 128 | 238 | 4 | 4 | ||||||||||||
Total Securities sold, not yet purchased | $ | 7,075 | $ | 8,244 | $ | 2,393 | $ | 2,229 |
F -
15
GBL has
an established accounting policy and methodology to determine
other-than-temporary impairment. Under this policy, a holding must
generally be impaired for nine consecutive months in order to be considered
other-than-temporarily impaired. Once the nine month threshold is
met, the investment is considered other-than-temporarily impaired and the
appropriate writedown is taken in accordance with FASB Statement No. 115 "Accounting
for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity
Securities". However, the determination of temporary versus
other-than-temporary impairment for investments where the impairment is less
than nine consecutive months are subject to further scrutiny. GBL
augments the general systematic “nine month” methodology by identifying both
issuer-specific declines and market/industry related declines, which might
indicate other-than-temporary impairment in instances where the nine consecutive
month threshold has not yet been met. The
Company has the ability and intent to hold these investments until they are no
longer in a loss position.
At
December 31, 2006, there was one holding in a loss position which was not deemed
to be other-than-temporarily impaired due to the length of time that it had been
in a loss position (less than nine months) and because it passed scrutiny in our
evaluation of issuer-specific and industry-specific
considerations. In this specific instance, the one investment at
December 31, 2006 was a mutual fund with diversified holdings across multiple
companies and in most cases across multiple industries. Given this
diversification, it was concluded that no deviation from the nine month criteria
was warranted. The one holding at December 31, 2006 was impaired for
one month. The value of the one holding at December 31, 2006 was $1.1
million.
At
December 31, 2007, there were fifteen holdings in a loss position which were not
deemed to be other-than-temporarily impaired due to the length of time they had
been in a loss position (less than nine months) and because they passed scrutiny
in our evaluation of issuer-specific and industry-specific
considerations. In each of these specific instances, the investments
at December 31, 2007 were mutual funds with diversified holdings across
multiple companies and in most cases across multiple
industries. Given this diversification, it was concluded that no
deviation from the nine month criteria was warranted. Eight holdings
were impaired for two consecutive months, two holdings were impaired for six
consecutive months and five holdings were impaired for seven consecutive months.
The value of the fifteen holdings at December 31, 2007 was $3.8 million.
For the
years ended December 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007, there were $3.3 million, $0.1
million and $5.1 million, respectively, in losses on available for sale
securities deemed to be other than temporary, which were recorded in the
consolidated statements of income.
Management determines the appropriate classification of debt and equity
securities at the time of purchase and reevaluates such designation as of each
balance sheet date. Investments in Treasury Bills and Notes with
maturities of greater than three months at the time of purchase are classified
as investments in securities and with maturities of three months or less at time
of purchase are classified as cash and cash equivalents. A
substantial portion of investments in securities are held for resale in
anticipation of short-term market movements and therefore are classified as
trading securities. Trading securities are stated at fair value, with any
unrealized gains or losses, net of deferred taxes, reported in current period
earnings. Available for sale (“AFS”) investments are stated at fair value, with
any unrealized gains or losses, net of management fee and taxes, reported as a
component of stockholders’ equity except for losses deemed to be other than
temporary which are recorded as realized losses in the consolidated statements
of income.
GBL uses
swaps and treasury futures to manage its exposure to market and credit risks
from changes in certain equity prices, interest rates, and volatility and does
not hold or issue swaps and treasury futures for speculative or trading
purposes. These
swaps and treasury futures are not designated as hedges, and changes in fair
values of these derivatives are included in net gain from investments in the
consolidated statements of income. As of
December 31, 2007 and 2006, the notional value of derivatives included within
Investments in securities was $4.4 and $19.2 million, respectively. For the
years ended 2007, 2006 and 2005, the effect of derivative transactions was
immaterial to GBL's consolidated statements of income.
C. Investments
in Partnerships and Affiliates
Beginning
January 1, 2006, the provisions of FIN 46R and EITF 04-5 require consolidation
of the majority of our investment partnerships and offshore funds managed by our
subsidiaries into our consolidated financial statements. However,
since we amended the agreements of certain investment partnerships and an
offshore fund on March 31, 2006, FIN 46R and EITF 04-5 only required us to
consolidate these entities on our consolidated statements of income and
consolidated statements of cash flows for the first quarter 2006. The business
purpose of amending the agreements was to avoid having to consolidate
them. There was no economic impact of giving up control of these
entities.
The consolidation of the entities whose agreements were amended
to add the substantive kickout rights and were not consolidated at and after
March 31, 2006 but whose results of operations were consolidated for the three
months ended March 31, 2006 had the following impact on our Consolidated
Statement of Income for the three months ended March 31, 2006: decrease to
distribution fees and other income revenues of $0.9 million, increase to other
operating expenses of $0.2 million, decrease in operating income of $1.0
million, increase to net gain from investments of $13.6 million, increase to
interest and dividend income of $1.3 million, increase to interest expense of
$0.6 million, increase to income taxes of $4.9 million and an increase to
minority interest of $8.2 million. There was no impact on net income
for the three months ended March 31, 2006. The impact on the cash
flows for the three months ended March 31, 2006 was as
follows: $627.9 million in purchase of trading investments in
securities and securities sold short, $609.4 million in proceeds from sales of
trading investments in securities and securities sold short, $28.2 million in
contributions related to investment partnerships and offshore funds consolidated
under FIN 46R and EITF 04-5, net, $13.8 million of income related to investment
partnerships and offshore funds consolidated under FIN 46R and EITF 04-5, net,
$11.5 million increase in receivable from brokers, $11.7 million of realized
gains on sales of investments in securities and securities sold short, net,
$11.4 million decrease in accrued expenses and other liabilities, $6.3 million
increase in payable to brokers, $4.7 million increase in unrealized value of
investments in securities and securities sold short, net, $0.3 million of
investments in partnerships and affiliates, $0.4 million of equity in net gains
from partnerships and affiliates, less than $0.1 million in distributions from
partnerships and affiliates, and $0.3 million decrease in other
assets.
F -
16
We were not required to consolidate these entities with amended agreements
on our consolidated statements of financial condition at March 31,
2006. In addition, these partnerships and offshore funds, for which
the agreements were amended, are not required to be consolidated within our
consolidated statements of income and consolidated statements of cash flows or
on our consolidated statements of financial condition from the second quarter
2006 and forward as long as GBL continues to not maintain direct or indirect
control over the investment partnerships and offshore funds. For the
year ended December 31, 2006, the consolidation of these entities for the first
quarter 2006 had no effect on net income but does affect the classification of
income between operating and other income. The equity method of accounting is
applied for the investment partnerships and offshore funds that are not
consolidated under the provisions of FIN 46R and EITF 04-5.
In addition to the previously-mentioned entities consolidated for the first
quarter of 2006 only, we also consolidated five other investment partnerships
and two other offshore funds in which we had a direct or indirect controlling
financial interest as of and for the year ended December 31,
2006. Six of these seven entities were consolidated as of and for the
year ended December 31, 2006 as a result of applying the guidance in EITF 04-5
and the one other entity, an offshore fund, was consolidated as a variable
interest entity ("VIE") as a result of applying the guidance in FIN 46R. These
entities have been consolidated within our consolidated financial statements for
the year ended December 31, 2006. In addition to minor FIN 46R and
EITF 04-5 adjustments to the consolidated statements of income and consolidated
statements of cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2006 related to these
entities, the consolidation of these entities also resulted in minor adjustments
to our consolidated statements of financial condition at December 31,
2006. The consolidation of these entities on the consolidated
statements of financial condition has increased assets by $17.5 million,
liabilities by $3.2 million and minority interest by $14.3
million. As of and for the year ended December 31, 2007, eight
entities (the same six entities that were consolidated under EITF 04-5 as for
the prior year as well as two new entities established in 2007 for a total of
six investment partnerships and two offshore funds) are consolidated as a result
of applying the guidance in EITF 04-5. These entities have been consolidated
within our consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31,
2007 and will continue to be consolidated in future periods as long as we
continue to maintain a direct or indirect controlling financial interest. As of
and for the year ended December 31, 2007, we no longer consolidate any
investment partnerships or offshore funds under FIN 46R, and we will continue to
not consolidate under FIN 46R as long as we do not maintain a direct or indirect
controlling financial interest. The consolidation of these entities on the
consolidated statements of financial condition has increased assets by $5.3
million, liabilities by $0.1 million and minority interest by $5.2 million at
December 31, 2007. Prior to consolidation of these entities, our investments in
these entities were reflected within investments in partnerships and affiliates
on the consolidated statements of financial condition and accounted for under
the equity method.
For the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2007, the consolidation of these
entities had no impact on net income but did result in (a) the elimination of
revenues and expenses which are now intercompany transactions; (b) the recording
of all the partnerships’ operating expenses of these entities including those
pertaining to third-party interests; (c) the recording of all other income of
these entities including those pertaining to third-party interests; (d)
recording of income tax expense of these entities including those pertaining to
third party interests and (e) the recording of minority interest which offsets
the net amount of any of the partnerships’ revenues, operating expenses, other
income and income taxes recorded in these respective line items which pertain to
third-party interest in these entities. While this had no impact on
net income, the consolidation of these entities does affect the classification
of income between operating and other income.
We also serve as the investment manager or co-investment manager for
several offshore funds and the general partner for one partnership, which are
classified as VIEs. These offshore funds seek to earn absolute
returns for investors and are primarily focused within our event-driven
long/short equity and sector-focused strategies. The
partnership seeks to generate absolute returns by investing in, and optimizing,
a portfolio of several investment partnerships managed and advised by us.
Our involvement with one of these offshore funds began in 1994 but the majority
of the offshore funds were launched between 1999 and 2002. The
partnership began in 2005.
The total net assets of the six offshore funds and one partnership, which
are classified as VIEs, were approximately $32.8 million and $56.5 million on
December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively. As of January 1, 2007, we were
not the primary beneficiary or a holder of a significant variable interest in
any of the seven VIEs and therefore these are not consolidated in our
consolidated financial statements for 2007. For 2006, we were not the primary
beneficiary or a holder of a significant variable interest in six of the seven
VIEs and therefore these are not consolidated in our consolidated financial
statements. In the other instance, an unconsolidated related party
held an interest in an offshore fund which, when combined with the Company’s
cash flows from the incentive fee allocation and the management fee as
co-investment manager results in the Company being considered the primary
beneficiary of such entity in 2006. The same entity was no longer required to be
consolidated under FIN 46R in 2007 because we no longer were considered the
primary beneficiary. This offshore fund is a global event-driven long/short
equity fund with total assets of $9,246,000 and total liabilities of $872,000 at
December 31, 2006. This fund has been consolidated in accordance with FIN
46R as of and for the year ended December 31, 2006. As co-investment
manager of this fund, we earned approximately $62,000 in management and
incentive fees in 2006.
Our maximum exposure to loss as a result of our involvement with the six
offshore funds classified as VIEs is limited to our investment in the respective
VIEs which was only the case for one of these funds. On December 31,
2006 and 2007, we had an investment in the one offshore fund of approximately
$196,000 and $206,000, respectively. Our maximum exposure to loss as
a result of our involvement with the partnership classified as a VIE includes
our investment as well as being contingently liable for all of the partnership’s
liabilities in our capacity as general partner. On December 31, 2006
and 2007, we did not have an investment in this partnership.
We are general partner or co-general partner of various limited
partnerships and the Investment Manager of various offshore funds whose
underlying assets consist primarily of marketable securities. As described
above, some of these partnerships and offshore funds are consolidated and others
are not. As general partner or co-general partner of various limited
partnerships, we are contingently liable for all of the partnerships’
liabilities. Summary financial information from these partnerships that are
not consolidated at December 31, 2006 and 2007 and for the years then ended, is
as follows (in thousands):
2006
|
2007
|
|||||||
Total assets
|
$ |
261,437
|
$ |
278,040
|
||||
Total liabilities
|
3,637
|
42,327
|
||||||
Equity
|
257,800
|
235,713
|
||||||
Our balance sheet caption “investments in partnerships and
affiliates” includes those investments, both external and internal
partnerships, which we account for under the equity method of
accounting. We reflect the equity in earnings of these equity method
investees under the caption net gain from investments on the consolidated
statements of income. For 2005, 2006 and 2007, the equity in earnings
of these equity method investees was $7.0 million, $7.4 million and $2.4
million, respectively.
For the year ended December 31, 2007, the net earnings and Company's
carrying value for the above partnerships that are not consolidated were
$12,808,000 and $10,006,000, respectively. For the year ended
December 31, 2006, the net earnings and Company's carrying value for the above
partnerships that are not consolidated were $24,548,000 and $12,862,000,
respectively. For the year ended December 31, 2005, the net earnings for the
above partnerships that are not consolidated was $13,804,000.
For the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2007, the income from our
investments in the above partnerships that are not consolidated was $849,000 and
$524,000, respectively. For the year ended December 31, 2005, the
income from our investments for all of the partnerships was approximately
$747,000.
As general partner or co-general partner of various limited
partnerships, we receive a management fee based on a percentage of each
partnership's net assets and a 20% incentive allocation based on economic
profits. For the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2007 for the
partnerships that were not consolidated, we earned management fees of
$1,606,000 and $1,975,000, respectively, and incentive allocations of
$2,373,000 and $1,506,000, respectively. For the year ended December
31, 2005 for all of the partnerships, we earned management fees of approximately
$1,865,000 and earned incentive allocations of $1,585,000.
F -
17
We also serve as investment manager or co-investment manager for
various affiliated offshore funds whose underlying assets consist primarily of
marketable securities. As the investment manager or
co-investment manager, we earn a management fee based on a percentage of net
assets and are entitled to a 20% incentive allocation based on the absolute gain
in the portfolio. For the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, for the
offshore funds that are not consolidated, we earned management fees of
$1,620,000 and $1,850,000, respectively, and recorded incentive fees of
$1,725,000 and $3,656,000. For the year ended December 31, 2005 for
all of the offshore funds, we earned management fees of $2,306,000 and recorded
incentive fees of $3,013,000. At December 31, 2006 and 2007, for
the offshore funds that are not consolidated, we had investments in these
affiliated offshore funds aggregating $29,008,000 and $23,942,000, respectively,
and earned income of $3,292,000 and $1,505,000, respectively.
At December 31, 2006 and 2007, we had various interests in
unaffiliated limited partnerships, offshore funds and other investments
aggregating approximately $21,098,000 and $35,007,000, respectively. For the
years ended December 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007, we recorded net gains related to
these investments of approximately $1,183,000, $2,078,000, and $401,000,
respectively.
At December 31, 2006 and 2007, as a result of consolidation under the
provisions of FIN 46R and EITF 04-5 we included $18.9 million and $7.4 million
in limited partnership investments in master funds in investments in
partnerships and affiliates on the consolidated statements of financial
condition.
D. Income
Taxes
We account for income taxes under the liability method prescribed by
FAS 109. Under FAS 109, deferred income taxes reflect the net effects
of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities
for financial accounting purposes and the amounts used for income tax
purposes.
GBL and our greater than 80% owned subsidiaries file a consolidated
federal income tax return. Teton, our less than 80% owned subsidiary files a
separate federal income tax return. Accordingly, the income tax
provision represents the aggregate of the amounts provided for all
companies.
In May
2007, the FASB issued FSP FIN 48-1, “Definition of Settlement in FASB
Interpretation No. 48”, amending FSP FIN 48 to clarify that a tax position could
be effectively settled upon examination by a taxing authority. We have updated
our schedule of uncertain tax positions and the impact of taxes, interest, and
penalties has been reflected in the consolidated financial
statements.
Income
tax expense is based on pre-tax financial accounting income, including
adjustments made for the recognition or derecognition related to uncertain tax
positions. The recognition or derecognition of income tax expense related
to uncertain tax positions is determined under the guidance as prescribed by
FIN 48. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the
future tax attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying
amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases.
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates
expected to be recovered or concluded. The effect on deferred tax assets
and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in earnings in the period
that includes the enactment date.
The provision for (benefit from) income taxes for the years ended
December 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007 consisted of the following:
2005
|
2006
|
2007
|
|||||||||
(In Thousands) | |||||||||||
Federal:
|
|||||||||||
Current
|
$ |
32,024
|
$ |
52,472
|
$ |
40,738
|
|||||
Deferred
|
1,183
|
(6,502
|
) | 2,002 | |||||||
State and local:
|
|||||||||||
Current
|
5,573
|
5,505
|
6,903
|
||||||||
Deferred
|
(95 | ) |
(627
|
) | (95 |
)
|
|||||
$ |
38,685
|
$ |
50,848
|
$ |
49,548
|
||||||
Our effective tax rate for each of the years ended December 31, 2005,
2006 and 2007 was 37.5%, 38.2% and 38.2%, respectively. A
reconciliation of the Federal statutory income tax rate to the effective tax
rate is set forth below:
2005
|
2006
|
2007
|
||||||||||
Statutory Federal income tax
rate
|
35.0 | % | 35.0 | % | 35.0 | % | ||||||
State income tax, net of Federal
benefit
|
3.5
|
2.4
|
3.4
|
|||||||||
Other
|
(1.0 | ) | 0.8 |
(0.2
|
) | |||||||
Effective income tax
rate
|
37.5 | % | 38.2 | % | 38.2 | % |
Significant components of our deferred tax assets and liabilities
were as follows:
2006
|
2007
|
|||||||
Deferred tax assets:
|
(in
thousands)
|
|||||||
Stock option expense
|
$ | (622 | ) | $ | (618 | ) | ||
Deferred compensation
|
(3,602 | ) | (2,885 | ) | ||||
Accrued Bonus
|
(1,575
|
) | - | |||||
Reserve for settlement
|
(4,500
|
) | (4,514 | ) | ||||
Other
|
(495 | ) | (478 | ) | ||||
Total deferred tax assets
|
(10,794 | ) | (8,495 | ) | ||||
Deferred tax liabilities:
|
||||||||
Investments in securities available for sale
|
6,207
|
9,753
|
||||||
Investments in securities and partnerships
|
4,551
|
4,357
|
||||||
Other
|
399
|
199
|
||||||
Total deferred tax liabilities
|
11,157
|
14,309
|
||||||
Net deferred tax liabilities
|
$ |
363
|
$ |
5,814
|
F -
18
The
Company adopted the provisions of FIN 48 on January 1, 2007. Upon
such adoption, the Company had a cumulative effect of $0.8 million, which was
accounted for as a reduction to the January 1, 2007 balance of retained
earnings. As of January 1, 2007, the Company had a gross
unrecognized tax benefit of approximately $2.6 million, of which recognition of
$2.5 million would impact the Company’s effective tax rate. As of December
31, 2007, the total amount of gross unrecognized tax benefits was approximately
$8.1 million, of which recognition of $5.3 million would impact the Company’s
effective tax rate.
A reconciliation of the beginning
and ending amount of gross unrecognized tax benefits is as follows:
(in
millions)
|
||||
Balance at January 1, 2007 | $ | 2.6 | ||
Additions based on tax positions related to the current year | 2.8 | |||
Additions for tax positions of prior years | 3.0 | |||
Reductions for tax positions of prior years | - | |||
Settlements | (0.3 | ) | ||
Balance at December 31, 2007 | $ | 8.1 |
The
Company’s historical accounting policy with respect to penalties and interest
related to tax uncertainties has been to classify these amounts as income taxes,
and the Company continued this classification upon the adoption of FIN 48.
As of
December 31, 2007, the Company had a gross unrecognized tax benefit of
approximately $3.5 million related to interest and penalties, of which
recognition of $2.6 million would impact the Company’s effective tax
rate. For the year ended December 31, 2007,
the Company recorded income tax expense related to an increase in its liability
for interest and penalties of $1.6 million.
The
Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) concluded its audit of the 2003 and 2004
federal income tax returns during the year ended December 31, 2007. Total
adjustments of $1.4 million were recognized during the year ended December 31,
2007. The 2005 and 2006 federal income tax returns remain subject to
potential future audit by the IRS.
The
Company is currently being audited by New York state for its income tax returns
filed between 1999 and 2003. It is reasonably possible that the Company
will conclude the audits of 1999 and 2000 within the next 12-month period and the Company
does not expect that the potential assessments will be material to its results
of operations. The state income tax returns for all years
after 2003 are subject to potential future audit by tax authorities in the
Company’s major state tax jurisdictions.
F -
19
E. Debt
Debt consists of the following (in thousands):
2006
|
2007
|
|||||||
5.5% Senior notes
|
$ |
100,000
|
$ |
100,000
|
||||
6% Convertible note (a)
|
49,504
|
49,608
|
||||||
5.22% Senior notes
|
82,308
|
-
|
||||||
Total
|
$ |
231,812
|
$ |
149,608
|
||||
(a) The face value was $50 million at December 31, 2006 and 2007.
5.5% Senior
notes
On May 15, 2003, we issued 10-year, $100 million senior
notes. The senior notes, due May 15, 2013, pay interest semi-annually
at 5.5%.
6% Convertible
note
On August 13, 2001, we issued a 10-year, $100 million convertible
note to Cascade Investment LLC (“Cascade”). The convertible note, due
August 14, 2011, paid interest semi-annually at 6.5% for the first year and 6%
thereafter and was convertible into our class A common stock at $53 per
share. In August 2003, the interest rate on the note was lowered to
5% and the conversion price was lowered by $1 per share to $52 per
share. On April 1, 2005 we repurchased $50 million, plus accrued
interest. On June 30, 2006, we and Cascade agreed to amend the
terms of the $50 million convertible note issued by us (the "Note") and maturing
in August 2011, as follows: increase the coupon rate of interest to 6% from 5%
and raise the conversion price to $53 per GBL share from $52 per share, both
effective on September 15, 2006. In addition, we and Cascade agreed to extend
the exercise date for Cascade's put option until May 15, 2007. The expiration
date of the related letter of credit was extended to May 22, 2007 and a call
option was included giving us the right to redeem the Note at 101% of its
principal amount together with all accrued but unpaid interest thereon upon at
least 30 days prior written notice, subject to certain provisions. The
evaluation of the change in the terms of the Note under EITF 96-19, “Debtor’s
Accounting for a Modification or Exchange of Debt Instruments,” and EITF 05-7,
“Accounting for Modifications to Conversion Options Embedded in Debt Instruments
and Related Issues,” resulted in a debt discount of $632,500, which is being
amortized over the remaining life of the debt. For the years ended December 31,
2006 and 2007, we amortized $137,000 and $104,000, respectively, of the
debt discount. On April
18, 2007, the Company and Cascade amended the terms of the Note maturing in
August 2011, to extend the exercise date for Cascade’s put option from May 15,
2007 to December 17, 2007 and to extend the expiration date of the related
letter of credit to December 24, 2007. The put option expired on
December 17, 2007, the related letter of credit expired on December 24, 2007,
and the collateral securing the letter of credit was released and became
unrestricted Company assets as of that date. An
evaluation of these changes did not result in an additional debt discount as per
the provisions of EITF 96-19. The Note matures on August 14, 2011.
Subsequent to December 31, 2007, on January 18, 2008, a registration
statement on Form S-3 was declared effective by the SEC for
the registration for resale
by Cascade an aggregate of 943,396 shares of class A common stock issuable upon
conversion of the Note of the Company issued to Cascade on August 14, 2001. On
January 22, 2008, Cascade elected to convert $10 million of the Note into
188,697 GBL shares. Cascade requested that the remaining $40 million face value
of notes be segregated into eight notes each with a face value of $5
million.
If this Note were converted, Cascade would own approximately 11% of
our aggregate outstanding class A common stock as of December 31,
2007. GBL is required to reserve and keep available free from
pre-emptive rights, shares of common stock out of its authorized stock for
purpose of conversion of the Note.
On August 9, 2002, the Board of Directors authorized GBL to establish
a collateral account consisting of cash or securities totaling $103 million,
lowered to $102.5 million in August 2003, lowered again to $51.3 million in
April 2005, to secure a $51.3 million letter of credit in favor of
Cascade. We have paid fees of $148,000 in 2005, $128,000 in 2006, and
$126,000 in 2007 on the collateral account. The $51.3 million letter of
credit expired on December 24, 2007. At that time, all cash or
securities held in the collateral account were made available for general
corporate use.
5.22% Senior
Notes
On February 6, 2002, we completed our public offering of 3.6 million
mandatory convertible securities. The securities were listed on the
NYSE under the symbol “GBL.I” until February 2005. These securities
initially consisted of (a) a purchase contract under which the holder purchased
shares of our class A common stock on February 17, 2005 and (b) senior notes due
February 17, 2007. In connection with the offering, we received
$90,000,000 before underwriting and other expenses of approximately
$3,100,000. For accounting purposes, the net present value of the
purchase contract adjustments and their related offering costs, totaling $4.6
million, have been recorded as a reduction to additional paid in
capital. Costs incurred in connection with the issuance of the senior
notes have been capitalized as deferred financing costs and will be amortized as
an adjustment to interest expense over the term of the notes. During
2005, 2006 and 2007, approximately $97,000, $91,000 and $8,000, respectively,
have been amortized to interest expense.
F -
20
The notes paid interest quarterly at a rate of 5.22% per year, which
rate was reset on November 17, 2004. Each purchase contract obligated
its holder to purchase, on February 17, 2005, newly issued shares of our class A
common stock. During December 2004, a holder of 469,600 purchase
contracts purchased 252,456 shares of our class A common stock through early
settlement. In February 2005, the remaining holders of the 2,822,700
purchase contracts purchased 1,517,483 shares of our class A common stock for
$70,569,000. These securities were paid in full on February 17, 2007.
F. Stockholders'
Equity
Voting
Rights
The holders of class A common stock and class B common stock have
identical rights except that (i) holders of class A common stock are entitled to
one vote per share, while holders of class B common stock are entitled to ten
votes per share on all matters to be voted on by shareholders in general, and
(ii) holders of class A common stock are not eligible to vote on matters
relating exclusively to class B common stock and vice versa.
On November 30, 2007, class A
common stock shareholders approved that the Board of Directors should consider
the conversion and reclassification of our shares of class B common stock into
class A common stock at a ratio of 1.15 shares of class A common stock for each
share of class B common stock. The Board of Directors have yet to take
action.
Stock Award and
Incentive Plan
We maintain two Plans approved by the shareholders, which are
designed to provide incentives which will attract and retain individuals key to
the success of GBL through direct or indirect ownership of our common
stock. Benefits under the Plans may be granted in any one or a
combination of stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock,
restricted stock units, stock awards, dividend equivalents and other stock or
cash based awards. A maximum of 1,500,000 shares of class A common
stock have been reserved for issuance under each of the Plans by a committee of
the Board of Directors responsible for administering the Plans. Under
the Plans, the committee may grant either incentive or nonqualified stock
options with a term not to exceed ten years from the grant date and at an
exercise price that the committee may determine. Options granted
under the Plans vest 75% after three years and 100% after four years from the
date of grant and expire after ten years.
On December 7, 2007, employees of the Company were granted
385,400 RSA's under one of the plans. The allocation of the RSA's was
recommended by the Company's Chairman who did not receive an RSA award. The grant
date fair value of the RSA's is $63.50 per share which was the closing share
price of GBL shares on December 20, 2007, the effective grant
date under Statement 123(R) and FSP 123(R)-2 for purposes of calculation of
the compensation expense. This expense will be recognized over the vesting
period for these awards which is 30% over three years and 70% over five
years. During the vesting period, dividends to RSA holders
are held for them until the RSA vesting dates and are forfeited if the grantee
is no longer employed by the Company on the vesting dates. Dividends declared on
these RSA's are charged to retained earnings on the declaration
date.
A summary of the stock option and RSA activity for the years ended
December 31, 2006 and 2007 is as follows:
Options
|
RSA's
|
|||||||||||
Weighted
Average
|
||||||||||||
Shares
|
Exercise
Price
|
Awards
|
||||||||||
Outstanding,
December 31, 2005
|
226,325 | $ | 30.38 | - | ||||||||
Granted
|
10,000 | $ | 39.55 | - | ||||||||
Forfeited
|
(10,000 | ) | $ | 44.90 | - | |||||||
Exercised
|
(33,250 | ) | $ | 20.75 | - | |||||||
Outstanding,
December 31, 2006
|
193,075 | $ | 31.77 | - | ||||||||
Granted
|
10,000 | $ | 39.90 | 385,400 | ||||||||
Forfeited
|
(10,000 | ) | $ | 39.65 | (3,000 | ) | ||||||
Exercised
|
(9,150 | ) | $ | 25.72 | - | |||||||
Outstanding,
December 31, 2007
|
183,925 | $ | 32.08 | 382,400 | ||||||||
Shares
and/or awards available for future issuance
|
||||||||||||
at
December 31, 2007
|
865,375 |
At December 31, 2006 and 2007, there were exercisable outstanding stock options of 173,075 and 153,925, respectively. The weighted average exercise price of the exercisable outstanding stock options at December 31, 2006 and 2007 was $30.56 per share and $30.26 per share, respectively. At December 31, 2007, there were outstanding RSA's of 382,400 shares.
F -
21
The table below represents for various prices, the weighted average
characteristics of outstanding employee stock options at December 31, 2007.
Exercise
Price
|
Options
Outstanding
|
Weighted
average remaining contractual life
|
Options
currently exercisable
|
Exercise
Price of options currently exercisable
|
||||||||||||||
$ |
16.00
|
5,750
|
2.08
|
5,750
|
$ |
16.00
|
||||||||||||
$ |
16.28
|
7,525
|
1.08
|
7,525
|
$ |
16.28
|
||||||||||||
$ |
28.95
|
70,400
|
5.17
|
70,400
|
$ |
28.95
|
||||||||||||
$ |
29.00
|
22,000
|
5.42
|
22,000
|
$ |
29.00
|
||||||||||||
$ |
31.62
|
18,250
|
3.08
|
18,250
|
$ |
31.62
|
||||||||||||
$ |
39.55
|
10,000
|
8.33
|
-
|
N/A
|
|||||||||||||
$ |
39.65
|
30,000
|
6.42
|
30,000
|
$ |
39.65
|
||||||||||||
$ | 39.90 | 10,000 | 9.08 | - |
N/A
|
|||||||||||||
$ |
44.90
|
10,000
|
7.83
|
-
|
N/A
|
The weighted average estimated fair value of the options granted at
their grant date using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model was as
follows:
2005
|
2006
|
2007
|
||||||||||
Weighted average fair value of
|
||||||||||||
options granted:
|
$ |
11.99
|
$ |
11.64
|
$ |
11.00
|
||||||
Assumptions made:
|
||||||||||||
Expected volatility
|
23 | % | 23 | % | 19 | % | ||||||
Risk free interest rate
|
3.50 | % | 4.89 | % | 5.15 | % | ||||||
Expected life
|
5 years
|
5 years
|
5 years
|
|||||||||
Dividend yield
|
0.27 | % | 0.30 | % | 0.30 | % |
The expected volatility reflects the volatility of GBL stock over a
period of approximately four years, prior to each respective grant date, based
on month-end prices. The expected life reflected an estimate of the
length of time the employees are expected to hold the options, including the
vesting period, and is based, in part, on actual experience with other
grants. The dividend yield for the grants reflected the assumption of
a $0.03 per share quarterly dividend. The weighted average remaining
contractual life of the outstanding options at December 31, 2007 was 5.41
years.
Prior to January 1, 2003, we applied APB Opinion No. 25, “Accounting
for Stock Issued to Employees,” and related interpretations in accounting for
our stock option plan. Accordingly, no compensation expense was
recognized where the exercise price equals or exceeds the market price of the
underlying stock on the date of grant.
Effective January 1, 2003, we adopted the fair value recognition
provisions of Statement No. 123 in accordance with the transition and disclosure
provisions of SFAS No. 148, “Accounting for Stock Based Compensation –
Transition and Disclosure”.
We adopted Statement 123 (R) on January 1, 2005. In light
of our modified prospective adoption of the fair value recognition provisions of
Statement 123 (R) for all grants of employee stock options, the adoption of
Statement 123 (R) did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial
statements. During June 2005, the Board of Directors authorized the
accelerated vesting of all unvested stock options as of July 1,
2005. This resulted in the expensing of an additional $1.8 million in
stock option expense during the second quarter of 2005. The total
compensation costs related to non-vested awards not yet recognized is
approximately $19.4 million as of December 31, 2007. This will be
recognized as expense in the following periods:
2008
|
2009
|
2010
|
2011
|
2012
|
||||||||||||||
$ | 4,004,700 | $ | 3,963,000 | $ | 3,924,900 | $ | 3,916,100 | $ | 3,589,400 |
In August 2005, the Company commenced a tender offer to repurchase
all outstanding options to purchase its class A common stock. The
tender offer was completed in October 2005 and approximately 110 option holders
elected to tender options to purchase an aggregate of approximately 522,000
shares of its class A common stock. These option holders received an
aggregate of approximately $9.7 million in cash (less any withholding
taxes). For 2006, we recognized a tax benefit from previously
exercised stock options of $1.8 million. As a result of the
completion of the tender offer, there was a reduction in fully diluted shares
outstanding of approximately 130,000 shares.
F -
22
Stock Repurchase
Program
In 1999, the Board of Directors established the Stock Repurchase
Program through which we have been authorized to purchase up to $9 million of
our class A common stock. We completed the Stock Repurchase Program
during the first quarter of 2001 and on March 2, 2001 the Board of Directors
authorized the repurchase of an additional $3 million of our class A common
stock. On September 17, 2001, the Board of Directors raised the
amount authorized to repurchase shares to $10 million. In 2002, the
Board of Directors raised the amount authorized by $5 million in July and an
additional $10 million in December. In 2004, the Board of Directors
raised the amount authorized by $12 million in May, an additional $25 million in
August and by an additional 1 million shares in October. In addition,
the Board of Directors also authorized $25 million to be used for an accelerated
stock repurchase program as further discussed below. During 2005, the
Board of Directors authorized additional repurchases of 500,000 shares each in
August and November. During 2006, the Board of Directors authorized
additional repurchases of 500,000 shares in March, and 400,000 shares in May and
November. We also repurchased 300,000 shares of our class B common stock held by
GGCP, our parent, which was converted to class A common stock in December 2002
at $28.20 per share and an aggregate cost of $8.46 million. The
repurchase of these shares are not included in determining the total dollars
available under the Stock Repurchase Program. In 2006 and 2007, we
repurchased 1,335,032 and 186,400 shares at an average price of $40.88 per share
and $46.45 per share, respectively. There remain 862,000 shares
available under this program at December 31, 2007. Under the program,
we have repurchased 4,856,058 shares at an average price of $39.72 per share and
an aggregate cost of $192.9 million through December 31, 2007.
In November 2004, we entered into an accelerated stock repurchase program
(“ASR”) whereby we repurchased 400,000 shares of stock from an investment bank
for approximately $18.8 million. The ASR permitted us to repurchase
the shares immediately, while the investment bank would purchase the shares in
the market over time. The 400,000 shares repurchased under the
agreement were subject to a future contingent price adjustment based on the
actual prices paid by the investment bank to purchase our stock in the market
over time. At December 31, 2004, the investment bank had purchased
203,500 shares resulting in a contingent purchase liability of approximately
$120,000 for the Company. During 2005, the investment bank completed
its share repurchases resulting in a reduction to the original purchase
agreement of approximately $35,000. There were no share repurchases under this
ASR in 2006 and 2007.
Dividends
During 2005, we paid dividends of $0.69 per share to class A and
class B shareholders totaling $20.1 million. During 2006, we paid
dividends of $0.12 per share to class A and class B shareholders totaling $3.4
million. During 2007, we paid dividends of $1.12 per share to class A and class
B shareholders totaling $31.5 million. Under the terms of the RSA
agreements, we accrue dividends for RSA grantees from the date of grant but
these dividends are held for grantees who are not entitled to receive dividends
until their awards vest and only if they are still employed by the Company at
those dates. As of December 31, 2007, dividends accrued on RSA's not yet
vested were approximately $9,300.
F -
23
Shelf
Registration
On December 28, 2001, we filed a “shelf” registration statement
registering $400 million in aggregate amount of debt and other
securities. The issuance of the mandatory convertible securities used
$180 million and the issuance of the 5.5% Senior Notes used $100 million of the
shelf registration leaving $120 million for future use. Such
securities may be issued as debt securities, trust preferred securities or class
A common stock. In May 2006, the SEC declared effective the Company’s $400
million “shelf” registration statement on Form S-3. This provides us
flexibility to sell any combination of senior and subordinate debt securities,
convertible debt securities and equity securities (including common and
preferred securities) up to a total amount of $520 million.
G. Capital
Lease
On December 5, 1997, we entered into a fifteen-year lease, expiring
on April 30, 2013, of office space from an entity controlled by members of Mr.
Gabelli's family. The lease has been accounted for as a capital lease
in accordance with FASB Statement No. 13, "Accounting for Leases" ("Statement 13"), as it transfers
substantially all the benefits and risks of ownership to GBL. We have recorded a
capital lease asset and liability for the fair value of the leased
property. The capital lease is amortized over the fifteen-year lease
term on a straight-line basis. The capital lease liability is amortized over the
same term using the interest method of accounting. Capital lease improvements
are amortized from the date of expenditure through the end of the lease term on
a straight-line basis. The lease provides that all operating expenses relating
to the property (such as property taxes, utilities and maintenance) are to be
paid by the lessee, GBL. These are recognized as expenses in the
periods that they arise. Accumulated amortization on the leased property was
approximately $2,241,000 and $2,487,000 at December 31, 2006 and 2007,
respectively.
Future minimum lease payments for this capitalized lease at December
31, 2007 are as follows:
(In
thousands)
|
|||||
2008
|
$ |
890
|
|||
2009
|
765
|
||||
2010
|
765
|
||||
2011
|
765
|
||||
2012
|
765
|
||||
Thereafter
|
255
|
||||
Total minimum
obligations
|
4,205
|
||||
Interest
|
1,656
|
||||
Present value of net
obligations
|
$ |
2,549
|
Lease payments under this agreement amounted to approximately
$802,000, $834,000 and $856,000 for each of the years ended December 31, 2005,
2006 and 2007, respectively. The capital lease contains an escalation
clause tied to the change in the Consumer Price Index which may cause the future
minimum payments to exceed $765,000 annually. Future minimum lease
payments have not been reduced by related minimum future sublease rentals of
approximately $306,000, which are due from an affiliated
entity. Total minimum obligations exclude the operating expenses to
be borne by us, which are estimated to be approximately $820,000 per year.
H. Commitments
We rent office space under leases which expire at various dates
through June 2011. Future minimum lease commitments under these operating leases
as of December 31, 2007 are as follows:
(In
thousands)
|
||||
2008
|
$ |
562
|
||
2009
|
476
|
|||
2010 | 374 | |||
2011 | 147 | |||
$ |
1,559
|
Equipment rentals and occupancy expense amounted to approximately
$2,662,000, $2,722,000 and $3,001,000, respectively, for the years ended
December 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007.
F -
24
I. Related
Party Transactions
The
following is a summary of certain related party transactions. Further
details regarding these and other relationships will appear in our Proxy
Statement for our 2008 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.
GGCP,
Inc. owns a majority of our Class B Stock, representing approximately 95% of the
combined voting power and 72% of the outstanding shares of our common stock
at December 31, 2007.
We
lease an approximately 60,000 square foot building located at 401 Theodore Fremd
Avenue, Rye, New York as our headquarters (the “Building”) from an entity that
is owned by the children of Mr. Gabelli. Under the lease for the Building, which
expires on April 30, 2013, we are responsible for all operating expenses, costs
of electricity and other utilities and taxes. For 2007, the rent was $855,937,
or $14.27 per square foot, and will increase to $889,570, or $14.83 per square
foot, for the period January 1, 2008 through December 31, 2008. For
2005 and 2006, the rent was $802,384, or $13.37 per square foot, and $834,047,
or $13.90 per square foot, respectively.
Through
August 2007, we sub-leased approximately 5,069 square feet in the Building to an
unaffiliated entity, which paid rent to us at the rate of $28 per square foot
plus $3 per square foot for electricity. We also sub-lease
approximately 3,300 square feet in the Building to LICT Corporation, a company
for which Mr. Gabelli serves as Chairman, which also pays rent to us at the
rate of $28 per square foot plus $3 per square foot for electricity, subject to
adjustment for increases in taxes and other operating expenses. The total
amounts paid in 2005, 2006, and 2007 to us for rent and other expenses under
this lease were $111,332, $113,573, and $115,030, respectively. In
October 2007, we and LICT Corporation further agreed to extend the term of the
sub-lease for a minimum of three years until December 2013 on the same terms and
conditions.
Prior
to our initial public offering in February 1999, the Company and GGCP entered
into a Management Services Agreement, with a one-year term, renewable annually,
under which we will provide certain services for GGCP, including furnishing
office space and equipment, providing insurance coverage, overseeing the
administration of its business and providing personnel to perform certain
administrative services. The Management Services Agreement was renewed in May
2007. Pursuant to the Management Services Agreement, GGCP paid
us $200,000 for services provided in each of the years 2005 and 2006. For
2007, GGCP is currently negotiating an amount and is unlikely to extend this
agreement beyond 2007.
On
May 31, 2006, we entered into an Exchange and Standstill Agreement with
Frederick J. Mancheski, a significant shareholder, pursuant to which, among
other things, he agreed to exchange his 2,071,635 shares of Class B Stock for an
equal number of shares of Class A Stock. Certain shareholders of GGCP, including
two of our executive officers and a director, who received shares of Class B
Stock in a distribution from GGCP, also agreed to exchange their shares of Class
B Stock for an equal number of shares of Class A Stock. Pursuant to a
Registration Rights Agreement that we entered into with Mr. Mancheski, we filed
a shelf registration statement that was declared effective by the SEC on
September 1, 2006 for the sale by Mr. Mancheski and others, including certain of
our officers, employees and a director, of up to 2,486,763 shares of Class A
Stock.
For
2005, 2006, and 2007, we incurred charges of $159,124, $190,477, and $270,787,
respectively, for incremental costs (but not the fixed costs) relating to our
use of an airplane in which GGCP owns a fractional interest.
GAMCO,
a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, has entered into agreements to provide
advisory and administrative services to MJG Associates, Inc., which is
wholly-owned by Mr. Gabelli, and to GSI, a majority-owned subsidiary of the
company, with respect to the private investment funds managed by each of them.
Pursuant to such agreements, GSI and MJG Associates, Inc. paid
GAMCO $50,000 and $10,000, respectively, (excluding reimbursement of
expenses) for each of the years 2005, 2006, and 2007. Manhattan
Partners I, L.P. and Manhattan Partners II, L.P., investment partnerships for
which John Gabelli Inc. is the general partner, paid GAMCO investment
advisory fees in the amount of $54,499 for 2007 and Manhattan Partners I, L.P.
paid management fees in the amount of $16,959 to the general partners of Gemini
Global Partners, L.P. For 2006, the investment advisory fees were
$42,680 and the management fees were $15,779. Comparable amounts for
2005 were $65,443 and $15,598, respectively.
F -
25
Gabelli
Securities International Limited (“GS International”) was formed in 1994 to
provide management and investment advisory services to offshore funds and
accounts. Mr. Marc Gabelli, who had various responsibilities within several of
our subsidiaries and is the son of our Chairman, owns 55% of GS International
and GSI owns the remaining 45%. In 1994, Gabelli International Gold Fund Limited
(“GIGFL”), an offshore investment company investing primarily in securities of
issuers with gold-related activities, was formed and GS International entered
into an agreement to provide management services to GIGFL. GSI in turn entered
into an agreement with GS International to provide investment advisory services
to GIGFL in return for receiving all investment management fees paid by GIGFL.
Pursuant to such agreement, GSI received investment management fees of $62,184
and incentive fees of $156,211 for 2007. Comparable amounts for 2006
were $49,279 and $209,720, respectively, and for 2005 they were $77,649 and
$168,280, respectively. In April 1999, Gabelli Global Partners,
Ltd., an offshore investment fund, was incorporated. GS International and Gemini
Capital Management, LLC (“Gemini”), an entity owned by Mr. Marc Gabelli, were
engaged by the fund as investment advisors as of July 1, 1999. The fund paid
half of the management fees and incentive fees for 2007 in the amounts of
$36,462 and $11,281, respectively, to GS International, which amounts it in turn
paid to GSI for services provided. Therefore, for 2007, Gemini
received half of the management fee and incentive fee paid by the fund in the
amount of $36,462 and $11,281, respectively. For 2005 and 2006, there
were no incentive fees paid by the fund to GS International but there were
management fees paid by the fund to GS International of $73,696 and $61,651,
respectively, with equal amounts being received by Gemini in each
year. In 2005, GS International incurred $34,179 for the clawback of
incentive fees charged to the investment advisor from the fund, and Gemini
incurred its equal share, or $34,179, for this clawback. No clawback
amounts were recorded in 2005 and 2006. In April 1999, GSI formed
Gabelli Global Partners, L.P., an investment limited partnership for which GSI
and Gemini are the general partners. In March 2002, Gabelli Global Partners,
L.P. changed its name to Gemini Global Partners, L.P. Gemini received half of
the management fee paid by the partnership to the general partners in the amount
of $86,371 and half of incentive fee earned by the general partners in the
amount of $42,929 for 2007. Comparable amounts for 2006 were $90,096 and
$19,515, respectively, and comparable amounts for 2005 were $96,106 and $654,
respectively. In December 1999, Gabelli European Partners, Ltd., an
offshore investment fund, was incorporated. GS International was engaged as an
investment advisor by the fund as of January 1, 2000. For services rendered by
GSI, GS International paid GSI all of the management and incentive fees it
received for 2007 from the fund in the amount of $11,756 and $55,974,
respectively. Comparable amounts for 2006 were $38,915 and $42,133,
respectively, and comparable amounts for 2005 were $41,237 and $56,694,
respectively.
At
December 31, 2006 and December 31, 2007, approximately $176 million and $201
million, respectively, of our proprietary investment portfolio were managed by
our analysts or portfolio managers other than Mr. Gabelli. The individuals
managing these accounts receive 20% of the net profits, if any, earned on the
accounts; however, some of the analysts are required to meet a hurdle rate of 5%
before earning this 20% payout. A son of the Chairman, who is our Director
of Trading, was given responsibility in August 2006 for managing an account with
up to $50 million of our proprietary investments, which account was funded with
approximately $40 million during 2006, for which he would be paid on an annual
basis 20% of any net profits earned on the account for the year. For
2006 and 2007, he earned $118,427 and $401,624, respectively, for managing this
account.
As
required by our Code of Ethics, our staff members are required to maintain their
brokerage accounts at Gabelli & Company unless they receive permission to
maintain an outside account. Gabelli & Company offers all of its staff the
opportunity to engage in brokerage transactions at discounted rates.
Accordingly, many of our staff members, including the executive officers or
entities controlled by them, have brokerage accounts at Gabelli & Company
and have engaged in securities transactions through it at discounted rates. From
time to time, we through our subsidiaries in the ordinary course of business
have also provided brokerage or investment advisory services to our directors,
the substantial shareholders listed in the table under “Certain Ownership of Our
Stock” (in item 12 of this report on Form 10-K) or entities controlled by such
persons for customary fees.
We serve
as the investment advisor for the Funds and earn advisory fees based on
predetermined percentages of the average net assets of the Funds. In addition,
Gabelli & Company has entered into distribution agreements with each of the
Funds. As principal distributor, Gabelli & Company incurs certain
promotional and distribution costs related to the sale of Fund shares, for which
it receives a distribution fee from the Funds or reimbursement from the
investment advisor. Gabelli & Company earns a majority of its commission
revenue from transactions executed on behalf of clients of affiliated
companies. Advisory and distribution fees receivable from the Funds
were approximately $23,219,000 and $24,830,000 at December 31, 2006 and 2007,
respectively. GBL earned approximately $1,323,000, $1,308,000 and
$1,400,000 in 2005, 2006 and 2007, respectively, in advisory fee revenues and
approximately $15,000, $20,000 and $21,000 in 2005, 2006 and 2007, respectively,
in distribution fees from our proprietary investments in the Funds which are
included in investment advisory and incentive fees and distribution fees and
other income, respectively, on the consolidated statements of
income.
Gabelli
& Company also participates in syndicated underwriting activities, some of
which involve the issuance of preferred or common shares of Gabelli
closed-end funds. In 2005, 2006, and 2007, there were 2, 1, and 2 such
Gabelli closed-end fund offering underwritings, respectively, with Gabelli
& Company commitments for them of $5.9 million, $14.0 million and $42.5
million, respectively.
We had an
aggregate investment in the Funds of approximately $277,487,000 and $301,482,000
at December 31, 2006 and 2007, respectively, of which approximately $135,428,000
and $167,357,000 was invested in money market mutual funds, included in cash and
cash equivalents, at December 31, 2006 and 2007, respectively. GBL
earned approximately $4,615,000, $6,550,000, and $6,717,000 in 2005, 2006 and
2007, respectively, in interest income from our investment in our money market
mutual fund. Distributions from the Funds, which are included within interest
and dividend income on the consolidated statements of income, were approximately
$6,236,000, $12,750,000, and $11,391,000 in 2005, 2006 and 2007,
respectively.
Under an
Employment Agreement with the Chairman, we pay the Chairman 10% of our aggregate
pre-tax profits while he is an executive of GBL and devoting the substantial
majority of his working time to the business of GBL. The management fee was
approximately $11,462,000, $13,236,000, and $14,463,000 for the years ended
December 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007, respectively. For 2007, the
Chairman allocated $1,452,000 and in 2006 he allocated $1,250,000 of his
compensation to Douglas R. Jamieson, for activities and support of the
Chairman. The Chairman also earned $15,271,000, $14,763,000 and
$19,391,000, respectively, for acting as portfolio manager and/or attracting and
providing client service to a large number of GAMCO's separate accounts;
$17,272,000, $18,112,000 and $20,501,000, respectively; for creating and acting
as portfolio manager of several open-end funds; $9,557,000, $9,997,000 and
$16,723,000, respectively, for creating and acting as portfolio manager of the
closed-end Funds; and $2,087,000, $1,777,000 and $784,000, respectively, for
providing other services, including acting as portfolio and relationship manager
of investment partnerships for the years ended December 21, 2005, 2006, and
2007, which have been included in compensation costs, of which $4,210,000 and
$1,307,000 was payable at December 31, 2006 and 2007,
respectively.
On
February 6, 2008, Mr. Gabelli entered into an amended and restated employment
agreement which was approved by the GBL shareholders on November 30, 2007 and
which limits his activities outside of GBL. The Amended Agreement amended Mr.
Gabelli’s Employment Agreement primarily by (i) eliminating outdated provisions,
clarifying certain language and reflecting our name change, (ii) revising the
term of the Employment Agreement from an indefinite term to automatically
renewed one-year periods in perpetuity following the initial three-year term
unless either party gives 90 days written notice prior to the expiration of the
annual term following the initial three-year term,
(iii) allowing for services to be performed for former subsidiaries that are
spun off to shareholders or otherwise cease to be subsidiaries in similar
transactions, (iv) allowing new investors in the permitted outside accounts if
all of the performance fees, less expenses, generated by assets attributable to
such investors are paid to us, (v) allowing for the management fee to be paid
directly to Mr. Gabelli or to an entity designated by him, and (vi) adding
certain language to ensure that the Amended Agreement is construed to avoid the
imposition of any tax pursuant to Section 409A of the Code.
Consistent
with the firm’s practice since its inception in 1977, Mr. Gabelli will also
continue receiving a percentage of revenues or net operating contribution, which
are substantially derived from AUM, as compensation relating to or generated by
the following activities: (i) managing or overseeing the management of various
investment companies and partnerships, (ii) attracting mutual fund shareholders,
(iii) attracting and managing separate accounts, and (iv) otherwise generating
revenues for the company. Such payments are made in a manner and at rates as
agreed to from time to time by GAMCO, which rates have been and generally will
be the same as those received by other professionals at GAMCO performing similar
services. With respect to our institutional and high net worth asset management
and mutual fund advisory business, we pay out up to 40% of the revenues or net
operating contribution to the portfolio managers and marketing staff who
introduce, service or generate such business, with payments involving the
separate accounts being typically based on revenues and payments involving the
mutual funds being typically based on net operating contribution.
Mr.
Gabelli has agreed that while he is employed by us he will not provide
investment management services outside of GAMCO, except for certain permitted
accounts. The Amended Agreement may not be amended without the approval of the
Compensation Committee.
Refer
also to Note C and G.
F -
26
J. Financial
Requirements
As a registered broker-dealer, Gabelli & Company is subject to
Uniform Net Capital Rule 15c3-1 (the “Rule”) of the SEC. Gabelli & Company
computes its net capital under the alternative method permitted by the Rule
which requires minimum net capital of $250,000. We have consistently
met or exceeded this requirement.
In connection with the registration of our subsidiary, GAMCO Asset
Management (UK) Limited with the Financial Services Authority, we are required
to maintain a minimum Liquid Capital Requirement of £267,000 ($533,000 at
December 31, 2007), and an Own Funds Requirement of €50,000 ($74,000 at December
31, 2007). We have consistently met or exceeded these
requirements.
K. Administration
Fees
We have entered into administration agreements with other companies
(the “Administrators”), whereby the Administrators provide certain services on
behalf of several of the Funds and Investment Partnerships. Such
services do not include the investment advisory and portfolio management
services provided by GBL. The fees are negotiated based on
predetermined percentages of the net assets of each of the Funds.
L. Profit
Sharing Plan and Incentive Savings Plan
We have a qualified contributory employee profit sharing plan and
incentive savings plan covering substantially all employees. Company
contributions to the plans are determined annually by the Board of Directors but
may not exceed the amount permitted as a deductible expense under the Internal
Revenue Code. We accrued contributions of approximately $32,000, $67,000 and
$102,000 to the plans for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007,
respectively.
During 2005, the qualified contributory employee profit sharing plan
was terminated and the proceeds were distributed to the plan
participants. No contributions were made to the qualified
contributory employee profit sharing plan for 2005.
M. Quarterly Financial
Information (Unaudited)
Quarterly financial information for the years ended December 31, 2007
and 2006 is presented below.
2007
|
||||||||||||||||||||
(in thousands, except per share data)
|
1st
|
2nd
|
3rd
|
4th
|
Full
Year
|
|||||||||||||||
Revenues
|
$ |
66,606
|
$ |
68,277
|
$ |
68,469
|
$ |
89,017
|
$ |
292,369
|
||||||||||
Operating
income
|
20,511
|
17,168
|
27,100
|
38,388
|
103,167
|
|||||||||||||||
Net
income
|
19,164
|
17,997
|
18,337
|
24,071
|
79,569
|
|||||||||||||||
Net income per share:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Basic
|
0.68
|
0.64
|
0.65
|
0.86
|
2.83
|
|||||||||||||||
Diluted
|
0.67
|
0.63
|
0.64
|
0.84
|
2.79
|
|||||||||||||||
2006
|
||||||||||||||||||||
1st
|
2nd
|
3rd
|
4th
|
Full
Year
|
||||||||||||||||
Revenues
|
$ |
59,284
|
$ |
61,659
|
$ |
57,994
|
$ |
82,526
|
$ |
261,463
|
||||||||||
Operating
income
|
18,485
|
9,463
|
18,498
|
29,901
|
76,347
|
|||||||||||||||
Net
income
|
18,960
|
8,944
|
17,043
|
26,980
|
71,927
|
|||||||||||||||
Net income per share:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Basic
|
0.65
|
0.31
|
0.60
|
0.96
|
2.52
|
|||||||||||||||
Diluted
|
0.64
|
0.31
|
0.60
|
0.94
|
2.49
|
In the second quarter and fourth quarter of 2006, GBL recorded $12 million
and $3 million of reserves, respectively, for a regulatory matter. See Note O
below for details.
F -
27
N.
Goodwill
In
accordance with SFAS 142, we assess the recoverability of goodwill and other
intangible assets at least annually, or more often should events
warrant. During the first quarter of 2007, there was an impairment
charge of $56,000 recorded as a result of the voluntary deregistration of an
inactive broker dealer subsidiary. There was no impairment charge recorded
in 2006. At December 31, 2007, there remains $3.5 million of goodwill
related to our 92% owned subsidiary, GSI.
At November 30, 2007 and November 30, 2006, management conducted its
annual assessments and assessed the recoverability of goodwill and other
intangible assets and determined that there was no further impairment of the
remaining goodwill on GBL’s consolidated financial statements. In
assessing the recoverability of goodwill and other intangible assets,
projections regarding estimated future cash flows and other factors are made to
determine the fair value of the respective assets. If these estimates
or related projections change in the future, it may result in an impairment
charge for these assets to income.
O. Other
Matters
On
September 3, 2003, the New York Attorney General’s office (“NYAG”) announced
that it had found evidence of widespread improper trading involving mutual fund
shares. These transactions included the “late trading” of mutual fund
shares after the 4:00 p.m. pricing cutoff and “time zone arbitrage” of mutual
fund shares designed to exploit pricing inefficiencies. Since the
NYAG’s announcement, FINRA, the SEC, the NYAG and officials of other states have
been conducting inquiries into and bringing enforcement actions related to
trading abuses in mutual fund shares. We received information
requests and subpoenas from the SEC and the NYAG in connection with their
inquiries and have complied with these requests for documents and testimony. We
implemented additional compliance policies and procedures in response to recent
industry initiatives and an internal review of our mutual fund practices and
procedures in a variety of areas. A special committee of all of our
independent directors was also formed to review various issues involving mutual
fund share transactions and was assisted by independent
counsel.
As part
of our review, hundreds of documents were examined and approximately fifteen
individuals were interviewed. The Company has found no evidence that
any employee participated in or facilitated any “late trading”. The
Company also has found no evidence of any improper trading in our mutual funds
by our investment professionals or senior executives. As the Company
previously reported, we did find that in August of 2002, we banned an account,
which had been engaging in frequent trading in our Global Growth Fund (the
prospectus of which did not impose limits on frequent trading) and which had
made a small investment in one of our hedge funds, from further transactions
with our firm. Certain other investors had been banned prior to
that. The Company also found that certain discussions took place in
2002 and 2003 between GBL’s staff and personnel of an investment advisor
regarding possible frequent trading in certain Gabelli domestic equity
funds. In June 2006, we began discussions with the SEC staff for a
potential resolution of their inquiry. As a result of these discussions
the
Company increased its SEC reserve from an initial $1 million in 2003 to $16
million in 2006. In February 2007, the Company made an offer of
settlement to the SEC staff for communication to the Commission for its
consideration to resolve this matter. This offer of settlement is subject
to final agreement regarding the specific language of the SEC’s administrative
order and other settlement documents. Should an offer of
settlement with the SEC be agreed upon, it is contemplated that management will
engage a consultant to determine an appropriate distribution of disgorgement
proceeds to affected mutual fund shareholders. Since these discussions are
ongoing, the Company cannot determine at this time whether they will ultimately
result in a settlement of this matter, whether our reserves will be sufficient
to cover any payments by the Company related to such a settlement, or whether
and to what extent insurance may cover such payments.
In
September 2005, we were informed by the staff of the SEC that they may recommend
to the Commission that one of our advisory subsidiaries be held accountable for
the actions of two of the seven closed-end funds then managed by the subsidiary
relating to Section 19(a) and Rule 19a-1 of the Investment Company Act of
1940. These provisions require registered investment companies to
provide written statements to shareholders when a dividend is made from a source
other than net investment income. While the funds sent annual
statements containing the required information and Form 1099-Div statements as
required by the IRS, the funds did not send written statements to shareholders
with each distribution in 2002 and 2003. The staff indicated that
they may recommend to the Commission that administrative remedies be sought,
including a monetary penalty. The closed-end funds changed their notification
procedures, and we believe that all of the funds have been in compliance since
2004.
In November 2002, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 45, “Guarantor’s
Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect
Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others” (“FIN 45”), which provides accounting and
disclosure requirements for certain guarantees. The disclosure
requirements are effective for financial statements of interim or annual periods
ending after December 15, 2002. The interpretation’s initial
recognition and initial measurement provisions are applicable on a prospective
basis to guarantees issued or modified after December 31, 2002. We
indemnify our clearing brokers for losses they may sustain from the customer
accounts introduced by our broker-dealer subsidiaries. In accordance
with NYSE rules, customer balances are typically collateralized by customer
securities or supported by other recourse provisions. In addition, we
further limit margin balances to a maximum of 25% versus 50% permitted under
Regulation T of the Federal Reserve Board and exchange
regulations. At December 31, 2007 and 2006, the total amount of
customer balances subject to indemnification (i.e. unsecured margin debits) was
immaterial. The Company also has entered into arrangements with
various other third parties which provide for indemnification against losses,
costs, claims and liabilities arising from the performance of their obligations
under our agreement, except for gross negligence or bad faith. The
Company has had no claims or payments pursuant to these or prior agreements, and
we believe the likelihood of a claim being made is remote. Utilizing
the methodology in FIN 45, our estimate of the value of such agreements is de
minimis, and therefore an accrual has not been made in the financial
statements.
P. Subsequent
Events
On
January 18, 2008, a registration statement on Form S-3 was declared effective by
the SEC for the registration for resale
by Cascade an aggregate of 943,396 shares of class A common stock issuable
upon conversion of the Note of the Company issued to Cascade on August 14, 2001.
The Note matures on August 14, 2011.
On
January 17, 2008, the American Stock Exchange (“AMEX”) announced entry into a
definitive agreement to be acquired by NYSE Euronext. The AMEX has informed the
Company that each regular member will receive $311,924 in NYSE Euronext shares
as well as contingent consideration in the form of additional shares of NYSE
Euronext common stock based on the net proceeds (net of fees, taxes, and other
items), if any, from the expected sale of the AMEX headquarters in lower
Manhattan. At December 31, 2007, the Company’s two stock exchange memberships
totaling $197,998 are recorded at cost and are included in other assets. In
2008, the Company expects to receive $623,848 in NYSE Euronext shares and may
receive additional NYSE Euronext shares generated from the possible sale of the
AMEX headquarters.
On January 22, 2008, Cascade converted $10 million of their $50
million note into 188,697 shares of GBL class A common stock.
On January 24, 2008, the shareholders of Gabelli Advisers, Inc. voted
to approve changing the name of the company to Teton Advisors, Inc.
On February 5, 2008, the Board of Directors declared a regular
quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share to all of its shareholders, payable on
March 28, 2008 to shareholders of record on March 11, 2008.
On
February 6, 2008, the Company entered into an amended and restated Employment
Agreement with Mr. Gabelli, which was previously approved by the Compensation
Committee of the Board of Directors and our shareholders.
During 2008, the Company repurchased 62,504 shares at $52.12 per
share. This brings the remaining authorization under the stock repurchase
program to approximately 799,000 shares at March 14, 2008.
On March
10, 2008 the Enterprise Mergers and Acquisitions Fund's Board of Directors,
subsequent to obtaining shareholder approval,
approved Funds
Advisor as the investment advisor to the Enterprise Mergers and
Acquisitions Fund. GAMCO had been the sub-adviser to this fund.
This transaction is
expected to have a
positive, but nominal, effect on our
financial results.
F -
28
CHANGES
IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL
DISCLOSURE
|
None.
ITEM
9A: CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
(a) Evaluation of
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
The
Company maintains a system of disclosure controls and procedures that is
designed to provide reasonable assurance that information, which is required to
be timely disclosed, is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported to
management within the time periods specified in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). The
Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Co-Chief Financial Officers, after
evaluating the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in the Exchange Act) as of the end of the period covered by this
report, have concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are
effective to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be
disclosed by the Company in the reports that it files or submits under the
Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management,
including its principal executive officer and principal financial officers, as
appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure and are
effective to provide reasonable assurance that such information is recorded,
processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the
SEC’s rules and forms.
(b) Management’s
Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
GBL's management is responsible for establishing and maintaining
adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in
Rule 13a-15(f) of the Exchange Act. Management, with the
participation of the principal executive officer and under the supervision of
the acting co-principal financial officers, the Company conducted an evaluation
of the effectiveness of the GBL's internal control over financial reporting as
of December 31, 2007, as required by Rule 13a-15(c) of the Exchange Act.
There are inherent limitations to the effectiveness of any system of internal
control over financial reporting, including the possibility of human error and
the circumvention or overriding of the controls and procedures. Accordingly,
even effective internal control over financial reporting controls can only
provide reasonable assurance of achieving their control objectives. In making
its assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial
reporting, the Company used the criteria set forth by the Committee of
Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal Control-Integrated
Framework.
Based on its evaluation, management concluded that, as of December
31, 2007, the Company maintained effective internal control over financial
reporting. The
registered public accounting firm that audited the consolidated financial
statements included in the annual report containing the disclosure required by
this Item has issued an attestation report on the Company's internal control
over financial reporting.
(c) Changes in
Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There has
been no change in our internal control over financial reporting during the
quarter ended December 31, 2007 that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial
reporting.
ITEM
9B: OTHER INFORMATION
None.
II -
1
ITEM
10: DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT
Information regarding the Directors and Executive Officers of GBL and
compliance with Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is
incorporated herein by reference from the our definitive proxy statement for our
2008 Annual Meeting of Shareholders (the “Proxy Statement”).
GBL has adopted a Code of Business Conduct that applies to all of our
officers, directors, full-time and part-time employees and a Code of Conduct
that sets forth additional requirements for our principal executive officer,
principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller, or
persons performing similar functions (together, the “Codes of
Conduct”). The Codes of Conduct are posted on our website (www.gabelli.com) and
are available in print free of charge to anyone who requests a
copy. Interested parties may address a written request for a printed
copy of the Codes of Conduct to: Deputy General Counsel, GAMCO Investors, Inc.,
One Corporate Center, Rye, New York 10580-1422. We intend to satisfy
the disclosure requirement regarding any amendment to, or a waiver of, a
provision of the Codes of Conduct by posting such information on our
website.
In addition to the certifications attached as Exhibits to this Form
10-K, following its 2007 Annual Meeting, GBL also submitted to the New York
Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) a certification by our Chief Executive Officer that he
is not aware of any violations by GBL of the NYSE corporate governance listing
standards as of the date of the certification.
ITEM
11: EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Information from the Proxy Statement is incorporated herein by
reference.
SECURITY
OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED
STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
|
Information from the Proxy Statement is incorporated herein by
reference.
ITEM
13: CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
Information from the Proxy Statement is incorporated herein by
reference.
II -
2
ITEM
14: PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
The information set forth under the caption “Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm” in the Proxy Statement is incorporated herein by
reference.
Item
15: EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES, AND REPORTS ON FORM
8-K
(a) List of documents
filed as part of this Report:
|
(1)
|
Consolidated
Financial Statements and Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm’s
Reports included herein:
|
(2) Financial
Statement Schedules
Financial statement
schedules are omitted as not required or not applicable or because
the information is included in the Financial Statements or
notes thereto.
(3) List of
Exhibits:
Exhibit
Number Description of
Exhibit
|
3.1
|
--
|
Restated Certificate of Incorporation of GAMCO
Investors, Inc. (the “Company”). (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 3.0 to the Company's Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30,
2005 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 9,
2005).
|
|
3.2
|
--
|
Amended Bylaws of the Company. (Incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 3.4 to Amendment No. 4 to the Company's
Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-51023) filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on February 10,
1999).
|
|
4.1
|
--
|
Specimen of class A common stock Certificate.
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Amendment No. 3 to the
Company's Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-51023) filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 29,
1999).
|
|
4.2
|
--
|
Convertible Promissory Note, dated August 14, 2001, of
the Company. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.2 to the Company’s
Report on Form 8-K dated March 1, 2005 filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on June 30, 2006).
|
|
4.3
|
--
|
Indenture, dated as of February 6, 2002, between GAMCO
Investors, Inc. and The Bank of New York, as
Trustee. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the
Company's Report on Form 8-K dated February 8, 2002 filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on February 8,
2002).
|
|
4.4
|
--
|
First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of February 6,
2002, between GAMCO Investors, Inc. and The Bank of New York, as
Trustee. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the
Company's Report on Form 8-K dated February 8, 2002 filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on February 8,
2002).
|
|
4.5
|
--
|
Form of Note (included in Exhibit
4.4). (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to the
Company's Report on Form 8-K dated February 8, 2002 filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on February 8,
2002).
|
|
10.1
|
--
|
Management Services Agreement between the Company and
GFI dated as of February 9, 1999. (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 to Amendment No. 4 to the Company's Registration Statement on
Form S-1 (File No. 333-51023) filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on February 10, 1999).
|
|
10.2
|
--
|
Tax Indemnification Agreement between the Company and
GFI. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Amendment
No. 4 to the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No.
333-51023) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February
10, 1999).
|
|
10.3
|
--
|
GAMCO Investors, Inc. 1999 Stock Award and Incentive
Plan. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to Amendment
No. 4 to the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No.
333-51023) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February
10, 1999).
|
|
10.4
|
--
|
GAMCO Investors, Inc. 1999 Annual Performance Incentive
Plan. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to Amendment
No. 4 to the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No.
333-51023) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February
10, 1999).
|
|
10.5
|
--
|
GAMCO Investors, Inc. 2002 Stock Award and Incentive Plan.
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit A to the Company’s definitive proxy
statement on Schedule 14A filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on April 30, 2002).
|
II -
3
|
10.6
|
--
|
Employment Agreement between the Company and Mario
J. Gabelli. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to Amendment
No. 4 to the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No.
333-51023) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February
10, 1999).
|
|
10.7
|
--
|
Registration Rights Agreement, dated August 14, 2001,
between the Company and Cascade Investment LLC. (Incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company's Form 10-Q/A for the quarter
ended September 30, 2001 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on November 16, 2001).
|
|
10.8
|
--
|
Note Purchase Agreement, dated as of August 10, 2001,
by and among Cascade Investment LLC, a Washington limited liability
company, GAMCO Investors, Inc., a New York corporation, Mario J. Gabelli,
Gabelli Group Capital Partners, Inc., a New York corporation, and Rye
Holdings, Inc., a New York corporation, and Rye Capital Partners, Inc., a
Delaware corporation (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1.1 to the
Company's Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended September 30, 2001, filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 16, 2001), as amended
by the Third Amendment, dated as of February 28, 2005 (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 99.2 to the Company’s Report on Form 8-K dated March
1, 2005 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 2,
2005), as amended by the Fourth Amendment, dated as of June 30. 2006
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to the Company’s Report on Form
8-K dated June 30, 2006 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on June 30, 2006).
|
|
10.9
|
--
|
Exchange and Standstill Agreement, dated May 31, 2006,
between the Company and Frederick J. Mancheski (Incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30,
2006 filed with the Security and Exchange Commission on August 8,
2006.)
|
|
10.10
|
--
|
Registration Rights Agreement, dated May 31, 2006.
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Form 10-Q for
the quarter ended June 30, 2006 filed with Security and Exchange
Commission on August 8, 2006).
|
|
12.1
|
--
|
Computation of Ratios of Earnings to Fixed
Charges.
|
|
21.1
|
--
|
Subsidiaries of the
Company.
|
|
23.1
|
--
|
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting
Firm
|
|
24.1
|
--
|
Powers of Attorney (included on page II-3 of this
Report).
|
|
31.1
|
--
|
Certification of CEO pursuant to Rule
13a-14(a).
|
|
31.2
|
--
|
Certification of Acting co-CFO pursuant to Rule
13a-14(a).
|
|
31.3
|
--
|
Certification of Acting co-CFO pursuant to Rule
13a-14(a).
|
|
32.1
|
--
|
Certification of CEO pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002.
|
|
32.2
|
--
|
Certification of Acting co-CFOs pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes- Oxley
Act of 2002.
|
__________________
(b) Reports on Form
8-K:
|
We filed the following Current Reports on Form 8-K
during the three months ended December 31,
2007.
|
1.
|
Current Report on Form 8-K, dated November 7, 2007 announcing that Karl Otto Pohl would be retiring from the Board of Directors and would serve as Director Emeritus following his retirement. |
2. |
Current Report on Form 8-K, dated November 9, 2007
containing the press release disclosing our operating results for the
third quarter ended September 30, 2007.
|
3. | Current Report on Form 8-K, dated November 30, 2007 containing the voting results of a special Meeting of Shareholders of GAMCO Investors, Inc. |
4. | Current Report on Form 8-K, dated December 7, 2007 annoucing the issuance of 385,400 shares of restricted stock awards to the Company's staff. |
5. | Current Report on Form 8-K, dated December 26, 2007 announcing that Vincent Tese would be resigning from the Board of Directors. |
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on
its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in the City of Rye,
State of New York, on March 14, 2008.
GAMCO INVESTORS, INC.
By:/s/ Kieran Caterina
|
By:/s/ Diane M. LaPointe
|
||
Name: Kieran Caterina
|
Name: Diane M. LaPointe
|
||
Title: Acting Co-Chief Financial Officer
|
Title: Acting Co-Chief Financial Officer
|
||
II -
4
Each person whose signature appears below hereby constitutes and
appoints Kieran Caterina, Diane M. LaPointe, and Chris Michailoff and each of
them, his true and lawful attorney-in-fact and agent with full power of
substitution and resubstitution, for him in his name, place and stead, in any
and all capacities, to sign any and all amendments to this report and to file
the same, with all exhibits thereto, and other documents in connection
therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and hereby grants to
such attorney-in-fact and agent full power and authority to do and perform each
and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done, as fully to all
intents and purposes as he might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and
confirming all that said attorney-in-fact and agent or his substitute or
substitutes may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
this report has been signed by the following persons in the capacities and on
the dates indicated.
Signature
|
Title
|
Date
|
/s/ Mario J. Gabelli
|
Chairman of the Board,
|
March 17, 2008
|
Mario J. Gabelli
|
Chief Executive Officer
|
|
(Principal Executive Officer)
|
||
and Director
|
||
/s/ Kieran Caterina | Acting Co-Chief Financial Officer | March 17, 2008 |
Kieran Caterina | ||
/s/ Diane M. LaPointe | Acting Co-Chief Financial Officer | March 17, 2008 |
Diane M. LaPointe | ||
/s/ Raymond C. Avansino, Jr.
|
Director
|
March 17, 2008
|
Raymond C. Avansino, Jr.
|
|
|
/s/ Edwin L. Artzt
|
Director
|
March 17, 2008
|
Edwin L. Artzt
|
||
/s/ Richard L. Bready
|
Director
|
March 17, 2008
|
Richard L. Bready
|
||
/s/ John D. Gabelli
|
Director
|
March 17, 2008
|
John D. Gabelli
|
||
/s/ Eugene R. McGrath
|
Director
|
March 17, 2008
|
Eugene R. McGrath
|
||
/s/ Robert S. Prather, Jr.
|
Director
|
March 17, 2008
|
Robert S. Prather, Jr.
|
II -
5
Exhibit 12.1
The following table sets forth certain information regarding our
consolidated ratio of earnings to fixed charges for the five-year period ended
December 31, 2007.
Year Ended
December 31,
|
||||||||||||||||||||
2003
|
2004
|
2005
|
2006
|
2007
|
||||||||||||||||
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges (a)
|
6.4
|
7.2
|
8.5
|
10.3
|
11.8
|
|||||||||||||||
(a)
|
These ratios were calculated by dividing the sum of fixed
charges into the sum of earnings before taxes and fixed
charges. Fixed charges for these purposes consist of all
interest expense and the approximate portion of rental expense
representing interest.
|
Exhibit 21.1
The following table lists the direct and indirect subsidiaries of
GAMCO Investors, Inc. (the “Company”), except those investment partnerships and
offshore funds consolidated in accordance with FIN46R and EITF
04-5. In accordance with Item 601 (21) of Regulation S-K, the omitted
subsidiaries considered in the aggregate as a single subsidiary would not
constitute a “significant subsidiary” as defined under Rule 1-02(w) of
Regulation S-X.
Name
|
Jurisdiction
of
Incorporation
or
Organization
|
Gabelli Funds, LLC
(100%-owned by the Company)
|
New York
|
GAMCO Asset Management Inc.
(100%-owned by the Company)
|
New York
|
Gabelli Fixed Income, Inc.
(100%-owned by the Company)
|
New York
|
GAMCO Asset Management (UK) Limited
(100%-owned by the Company)
|
United Kingdom
|
Gabelli Securities, Inc.
(92.1%-owned by the Company)
|
Delaware
|
Teton Advisors, Inc. (f/k/a/ Gabelli Advisers, Inc. until
January 24, 2008)
(42.1%-owned by the Company)
|
Delaware
|
Gabelli & Company, Inc.
(100%-owned by Gabelli Securities, Inc.)
|
New York
|
Gabelli & Partners LLC
(100%-owned by Gabelli Securities, Inc.)
|
Delaware
|
Gabelli Fixed Income L.L.C.
(100%-owned by Gabelli Fixed Income, Inc.)
|
Delaware
|
Gabelli Arbitrage Holdings LLC
(100%-owned by the Company)
|
Delaware
|
Gabelli Trading Holdings LLC
(100%-owned by the Company)
|
Delaware
|
Exhibit
23.1
CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
We
consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) of
GAMCO Investors, Inc. and Subsidiaries of our report dated March 17, 2008, with
respect to the consolidated financial statements of GAMCO Investors, Inc. and
Subsidiaries, included in the 2007 Annual Report to Shareholders of GAMCO
Investors, Inc. and Subsidiaries.
We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration
Statements:
1)
|
Registration
Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-148046) of GAMCO Investors, Inc. and
Subsidiaries,
|
2)
|
Registration
Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-74676) of GAMCO Investors, Inc. and
Subsidiaries,
|
3)
|
Registration
Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-102935) of GAMCO Investors, Inc. and
Subsidiaries and
|
4)
|
Registration
Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-76748) pertaining to the 1999 Stock Award and
Incentive Plan of GAMCO Investors, Inc. and
Subsidiaries.
|
of our
report dated March 17, 2008 with respect to the consolidated financial
statements of GAMCO Investors, Inc. and Subsidiaries incorporated herein by
reference and our report dated March 17, 2008, with respect to the effectiveness
of internal control over financial reporting of GAMCO Investors, Inc. and
Subsidiaries included herein.
/s/ Ernst
& Young LLP
New York,
New York
March 17,
2008
Exhibit 31.1
I, Mario J. Gabelli,
certify that:
|
1.
|
I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of GAMCO
Investors, Inc.;
|
|
2.
|
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under
which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;
|
|
3.
|
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;
|
|
4.
|
The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and
internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and
have:
|
a)
|
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us
by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which
this report is being prepared;
|
b)
|
Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or
caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under
our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability
of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for
external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles;
|
c)
|
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about
the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
and
|
d)
|
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal
quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or
is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal
control over financial reporting; and
|
5.
|
The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee
of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):
|
a)
|
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information;
and
|
b)
|
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management
or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s
internal control over financial reporting.
|
By:
|
/s/ Mario J. Gabelli
|
Name:
|
Mario J. Gabelli
|
Title:
|
Chief Executive Officer
|
Date:
|
March 17, 2008
|
Exhibit 31.2
I, Kieran Caterina, certify that:
|
1.
|
I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of GAMCO
Investors, Inc.;
|
|
2.
|
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under
which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;
|
|
3.
|
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;
|
|
4.
|
The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and
internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and
have:
|
a)
|
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us
by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which
this report is being prepared;
|
b)
|
Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or
caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under
our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability
of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for
external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles;
|
c)
|
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about
the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
and
|
d)
|
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal
quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or
is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal
control over financial reporting; and
|
5.
|
The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee
of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):
|
a)
|
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information;
and
|
b)
|
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management
or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s
internal control over financial reporting.
|
By:
|
/s/ Kieran Caterina
|
Name:
|
Kieran Caterina
|
Title:
|
Acting Co-Chief Financial Officer
|
Date:
|
March 17, 2008
|
Exhibit 31.3
I, Diane M. LaPointe, certify that:
|
1.
|
I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of GAMCO
Investors, Inc.;
|
|
2.
|
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under
which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;
|
|
3.
|
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;
|
|
4.
|
The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and
internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and
have:
|
a)
|
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us
by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which
this report is being prepared;
|
b)
|
Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or
caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under
our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability
of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for
external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles;
|
c)
|
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about
the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
and
|
d)
|
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal
quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or
is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal
control over financial reporting; and
|
5.
|
The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee
of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):
|
a)
|
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information;
and
|
b)
|
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management
or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s
internal control over financial reporting.
|
By: |
/s/ Diane M. LaPointe
|
Name: |
Diane M. LaPointe
|
Title: |
Acting Co-Chief Financial Officer
|
Date: |
March 17, 2008
|
Exhibit 32.1
18 U.S.C. Section
1350,
as Adopted
Pursuant to
Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of GAMCO Investors,
Inc. (the “Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Mario J.
Gabelli, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:
|
(1)
|
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and
|
|
(2)
|
The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.
|
By: |
/s/ Mario J. Gabelli
|
Name:
|
Mario J. Gabelli
|
Title:
|
Chief Executive Officer
|
Date:
|
March 17, 2008
|
This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Exhibit 32.2
18 U.S.C. Section
1350,
as Adopted
Pursuant to
Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of GAMCO Investors,
Inc. (the “Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Kieran
Caterina and Diane M. LaPointe, as Acting Co-Chief Financial Officers of the
Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to
§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of their
knowledge:
|
(1)
|
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and
|
|
(2)
|
The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.
|
By:
/s/ Kieran Caterina
|
By:
/s/ Diane M. LaPointe
|
Name: Kieran Caterina
|
Name: Diane M. LaPointe
|
Title: Acting Co-Chief Financial Officer
|
Title: Acting Co-Chief Financial Officer
|
Date: March 17, 2008
|
Date: March 17, 2008
|
This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.