GB SCIENCES INC - Quarter Report: 2015 September (Form 10-Q)
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
☒ | QUARTERLY REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2015
☐ | TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from __________ to ___________
Commission file number: 333-82580
GROWBLOX SCIENCES, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware (State or other Jurisdiction of
Incorporation |
59-3733133 (IRS Employer I.D. No.) |
6450 Cameron Street #110A
Las Vegas, Nevada 89118
Phone: (844) 843-2569
(Address and telephone number of
principal executive offices)
N/A
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. ☒ Yes ☐ No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). ☒ Yes ☐ No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer ☐ | Accelerated filer ☐ |
Non-accelerated filer ☐ (Do not check if a smaller |
Smaller reporting company ☒ |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Act). ☐ Yes ☒ No
There were 46,750,647 shares of common stock, par value $0.0001 per share, outstanding as of November 17, 2015.
GROWBLOX SCIENCES, INC.
FORM 10-Q
FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2015
INDEX
2 |
GROWBLOX SCIENCES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES |
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS |
(unaudited) |
September 30, 2015 | March 31, 2015 | |||||||
CURRENT ASSETS: | ||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 345,044 | $ | — | ||||
Accounts receivable, net | 10,000 | 50,000 | ||||||
Prepaid expenses | 73,937 | 190,374 | ||||||
TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS | 428,981 | 240,374 | ||||||
Property and Equipment, Net | 1,587,364 | 913,642 | ||||||
Intangible Assets | 3,555 | 3,555 | ||||||
Deposits and Prepayments | 264,406 | 293,920 | ||||||
TOTAL ASSETS | $ | 2,284,306 | $ | 1,451,491 | ||||
CURRENT LIABILITIES: | ||||||||
Accounts Payable | $ | 1,096,447 | $ | 677,230 | ||||
Accrued Interest | 10,572 | 230 | ||||||
Accrued Liabilities | 145,062 | 72,776 | ||||||
Notes Payable | 1,588,858 | 180,000 | ||||||
Deferred Revenue | — | 54,409 | ||||||
Deferred Compensation | — | 1,522,537 | ||||||
TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES | 2,840,939 | 2,507,182 | ||||||
Deferred Revenue | — | 220,506 | ||||||
Other Liabilities | — | 654,968 | ||||||
TOTAL LIABILITIES | 2,840,939 | 875,474 | ||||||
Commitments and Contingencies (Note 6) | ||||||||
STOCKHOLDERS’ (DEFICIT)/EQUITY: | ||||||||
Common Stock, $0.0001 par value, 250,000,000 shares authorized, 46,310,814 and 35,972,929 shares issued and outstanding at September 30, 2015 and March 31, 2015 | 4,631 | 3,597 | ||||||
Deferred Stock Compensation | 4,102,752 | 1,573,033 | ||||||
Additional Paid In Capital | 13,522,374 | 10,751,690 | ||||||
Accumulated Deficit | (18,031,270 | ) | (14,008,525 | ) | ||||
TOTAL GROWBLOX SCIENCES, INC. STOCKHOLDERS’ (DEFICIT)/EQUITY | (401,513 | ) | (1,680,205 | ) | ||||
Non-controlling interest | (155,120 | ) | (250,960 | ) | ||||
TOTAL (DEFICIT)/EQUITY | (556,633 | ) | (1,931,165 | ) | ||||
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ (DEFICIT)/EQUITY | $ | 2,284,306 | $ | 1,451,491 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements
3 |
GROWBLOX SCIENCES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES |
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS |
(unaudited) |
For the Three Months Ended September 30, | For the Six Months Ended September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2015 | 2014 | 2015 | 2014 | |||||||||||||
NET REVENUE | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||||
GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES | 2,693,145 | 1,780,161 | 4,215,910 | 3,275,358 | ||||||||||||
LOSS FROM OPERATIONS | (2,693,145 | ) | (1,780,161 | ) | (4,215,910 | ) | (3,275,358 | ) | ||||||||
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE) | ||||||||||||||||
Interest Income | — | 160 | 1,218 | 334 | ||||||||||||
Interest Expense | (10,571 | ) | — | (11,229 | ) | — | ||||||||||
Other | (985 | ) | — | (985 | ) | — | ||||||||||
Total other expense | (11,556 | ) | 160 | (10,996 | ) | 334 | ||||||||||
NET LOSS | (2,704,701 | ) | (1,780,001 | ) | (4,226,906 | ) | (3,275,024 | ) | ||||||||
Net income/(loss) attributable to non-controlling interest | (23,704 | ) | (109,902 | ) | (204,160 | ) | (159,707 | ) | ||||||||
NET LOSS ATTRIBUTABLE TO GROWBLOX SCIENCES, INC. | $ | (2,680,997 | ) | $ | (1,670,099 | ) | $ | (4,022,746 | ) | $ | (3,115,317 | ) | ||||
Net loss per share - basic and diluted | $ | (0.06 | ) | $ | (0.07 | ) | $ | (0.09 | ) | $ | (0.12 | ) | ||||
Weighted average common shares outstanding - basic and diluted | 46,104,790 | 34,046,111 | 43,331,875 | 25,515,847 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements
4 |
GROWBLOX SCIENCES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES |
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS |
(unaudited) |
Six Months Ended September 30, | ||||||||
2015 | 2014 | |||||||
OPERATING ACTIVITIES: | ||||||||
Net income (loss) | $ | (4,226,906 | ) | $ | (3,275,024 | ) | ||
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities: | ||||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 88,072 | 1,468 | ||||||
Stock-based compensation | 1,751,264 | 1,033,258 | ||||||
Deferred Compensation | (5,998 | ) | — | |||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: | ||||||||
Accounts receivable | 40,000 | — | ||||||
Prepaid expenses | 116,437 | (152,490 | ) | |||||
Accounts payable | 586,770 | (314 | ) | |||||
Accrued expenses | 84,627 | — | ||||||
Net cash used in operating activities | (1,565,734 | ) | (2,393,102 | ) | ||||
INVESTING ACTIVITIES: | ||||||||
Purchase of property and equipment | (761,793 | ) | (97,865 | ) | ||||
Change in deposits | 29,514 | (77,483 | ) | |||||
Net cash used in investing activities | (732,279 | ) | (175,348 | ) | ||||
FINANCING ACTIVITIES: | ||||||||
Net proceeds from the issuance of common stock and warrants | 1,229,057 | 3,579,612 | ||||||
Proceeds from non-controlling interest | 300,000 | 112,500 | ||||||
Proceeds from notes payable | 1,200,000 | — | ||||||
Repayment of debt | (30,000 | ) | — | |||||
Cash used to purchase warrants | (56,000 | ) | — | |||||
Other financing activities | — | 150,000 | ||||||
Stock subscription payable | — | 25,250 | ||||||
Net cash provided by financing activities | 2,643,057 | 3,867,362 | ||||||
Net change in cash and cash equivalent | 345,044 | 1,298,912 | ||||||
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENT AT BEGINNING OF PERIOD | — | 339,327 | ||||||
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENT AT END OF PERIOD | $ | 345,044 | $ | 1,638,239 | ||||
Non-cash transactions: | ||||||||
Stock issued to satisfy debt | $ | 167,451 | $ | 1,262,411 | ||||
Stock issued to settle interest expense | $ | — | $ | 252,304 |
5 |
GROWBLOX SCIENCES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
Note 1 – Basis of Presentation and Significant Accounting Policies
Basis of Presentation
The accompanying unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements of Growblox Sciences, Inc. (the “Company,” “We” or “Us”) have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“U.S. GAAP”) for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulations S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by U.S. GAAP for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. Operating results for the periods presented are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending March 31, 2016. The balance sheet at March 31, 2015 has been derived from the audited financial statements at that date but does not include all of the information and footnotes required by U.S. GAAP for complete financial statements. For further information, refer to the consolidated financial statements and footnotes thereto included in the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2015.
Principles of Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include all operating divisions and majority owned subsidiaries, reported as a single operating segment, for which we maintain controlling interests. Intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Reclassifications
Certain reclassifications have been made to the comparative period amounts in order to conform to the current period presentation. These reclassifications had no effect on the reported financial position, results of operations or cash flows of the entity.
Significant Accounting Policies
A description of the Company’s significant accounting policies is included in Item 15 of its Annual Report on Form 10–K/A (Amendment No. 1) for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2015.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
Management does not believe that any recently issued but not yet effective accounting pronouncements, if adopted, would have a material effect on the accompanying consolidated financial statements.
Note 2 – Going Concern
The Company’s financial statements have been prepared assuming the Company will continue as a going concern. The Company has sustained net losses since April 4, 2001, which have caused an accumulated deficit of approximately $18 million at September 30, 2015. In addition, the Company has consumed cash in its operating activities of approximately $1.6 million for the six months ended September 30, 2015 compared to $2.4 million for the same period last year. These factors, among others, raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.
6 |
Management has been able, thus far, to finance the losses through a public offering, private placements and obtaining operating funds from stockholders. The Company is continuing to seek sources of financing. There are no assurances that the Company will be successful in achieving its goals.
In view of these conditions, the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern is dependent upon its ability to obtain additional financing or capital sources, to meet its financing requirements, and ultimately to achieve profitable operations. Management believes that its current and future plans provide an opportunity to continue as a going concern. The accompanying financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of recorded assets, or the amounts and classification of liabilities that may be necessary in the event the Company is unable to continue as a going concern.
Note 3 – License Fee
On December 16, 2014, the Company entered into an agreement to license certain proprietary equipment to an entity that intends to market the service of isolating particular cannabis strains for the purpose of developing tissue from those strains so as to create a consistent, brandable product of the customer’s choosing from any such strain. The agreement was conditional upon approval from the appropriate regulatory body. During the quarter ended September 30, 2015, the approval was not granted. The Company is obligated to return the fee amount received. Thus, the $0.3 million initial license fee received from licensor was reclassified to notes payable.
Note 4 – Note Payable
We entered into a Note Purchase Agreement, dated May 12, 2015 and effective as of June 8, 2015, with Pacific Leaf Ventures, LP (“Pacific Leaf”), pursuant to which Pacific Leaf has made installment loans (the “Loans”) to us in the aggregate amount of $1.5 million and is required to make $250,000 in additional Loans. To evidence the Loans, we issued to Pacific Leaf a 6% senior secured convertible promissory note (the “Note”), bearing interest at the rate of 6% per annum, payable quarterly. All outstanding principal and interest due under the Note is due and payable on May 12, 2020. We are required to prepay the outstanding principal amount of the Note on a quarterly basis in an amount equal to 50% of the cash flow (accrued EBITDA) of GBS Nevada attributable to our percentage interest in GBS Nevada no later than the earlier to occur of (a) the fifth (5th) business day following receipt of a distribution of the Company’s Share of GBS Nevada EBITDA for the calendar quarter in question, or (b) thirty (30) days following the end of the calendar quarter in question, with the first such prepayment to be made not later than July 31, 2015 with respect to the quarter ending June 30, 2015. In order to induce the Pacific Leaf to extend the loan to the Company, the Grantors have agreed to grant Secured Party security and assurance in order to secure the payment and performance of all of the Secured Obligations, and to that effect to grant Secured Party a security interest in certain of their assets and enter into the lending agreement. The purpose of the financing is to provide for the acquisition and installation of an operating facility, equipment and other tangible assets by GBS Nevada. Such facility and equipment will be dedicated to the cultivation of cannabis and the extraction of oils and other constituents present in cannabis, subject at all times to Nevada legal requirements. The note is convertible at the option of the holder into common shares at a conversion price of $0.50, subject to anti-dilution adjustments. As of September 30, 2015, the total amount of installments received is $1.2 million.
Note 5 – Capital Transactions
During the six months ended September 30, 2015, the Board of Directors passed a resolution to temporarily reduce the exercise price of such B warrants from $2.00 per share to $0.20 per share in order to encourage the exercise of its B warrants, and the holders of the B warrants were notified of such temporary exercise price reduction. As a result of this incentive, B warrants to purchase 2,160,112 shares of common stock were exercised at $0.20 per share, resulting in net proceeds of $0.4 million.
On April 22, 2015, the Chief Executive Officer of Growblox Sciences Puerto Rico LLC, purchased 2,820,000 shares of common stock for $0.6 million or $0.21 per share. The Company agreed to register such common stock for resale under the Securities Act pursuant to a registration rights agreement. In addition, the Company sold 1,995,833 shares of common stock to investors for $0.21 per share, resulting in total proceeds of $0.4 million. The Company issued 476,190 shares of common stock during the current period, the warrants of which were purchased in March 2015 for $0.21 per share, or $100,000.
7 |
Between February, 2015 and May 15, 2015, certain holders of B Warrants sold back to the Company for $0.01 each, B warrants to purchase an aggregate of 1,600,000 shares of common stock. On April 27, 2015, two limited partnerships sold back to the Company for $0.01 each, warrants to purchase a total of 4,000,000 warrants for a total of $56,000.
In May 2015, the Company issued 1,000,000 shares of common stock in connection with a cashless exercise of B warrants.
During the six months ended September 30, 2015, the Company issued an aggregate of 2,252,000 shares of common stock in settlement and release of certain obligations owed by the Company to various persons and recorded related expenses of $1.7 million, as follows:
The Company issued 150,000 and 95,250 shares of restricted common stock in connection with the conversions of $30,000 and $19,025 in indebtedness owed by us at a conversion price of $0.20 per share.
The Company issued 796,000 shares of restricted common stock as compensation for consulting services. The Company recorded approximately $295,000 of compensation or $0.37 per share.
The Company issued 19,500 shares of restricted common stock pursuant to the terms of a July 23, 2015 Investor Relations Consulting Agreement (the “IRCA”). The IRCA has a term of 12 months under which the Company is obligated to pay 6,500 shares per month to the consultant. The 19,500 shares represent payment for the first three months of the IRCA.
The Company issued 424,400 shares of common stock to certain persons and employees and recorded an expense of $0.1 million.
During the current period, the Company cancelled 892,400 shares of common stock of which 392,400 of the cancelled shares represented shares erroneously issued associated with unexercised options, 100,000 shares erroneously issued under an employment agreement, and 400,000 shares issued under an employment agreement which were subject to forfeiture.
During the three months ended September 30, 2015, the Company modified and restructured certain employee agreements which resulted in a reclassification of previously recognized compensation obligations previously recorded as current and noncurrent obligations to equity. A portion of the related expense was recognized in the prior periods.
Subsequent to September 30, 2015, the Company issued 333,333 shares of restricted common stock for aggregate consideration of $100,000, or $0.30 per share.
Note 6 – Commitments and Contingencies
On April 2, 2014, the Company commenced an action in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York captioned Signature Exploration and Production Corporation v. GCM Administrative Services, LLC, Strategic Turnaround Equity Partners, L.P. (Cayman), Seth M. Lukash, and Gary Herman, 14 Civ. 02280 (ER) (the “Action”). After the change of name of Signature Exploration and Production Corporation, the caption was amended to substitute Growblox Sciences, Inc. as the plaintiff. The complaint in the Action sought a declaratory judgment that neither Lukash nor Herman was entitled to receive any interest in, including any shares of stock of, Growblox Sciences, Inc. pursuant to certain share conversion rights held under promissory notes in the aggregate amount of $75,000, given by a related party of ours to the entity defendants GCM and Strategic.
8 |
On May 9, 2014, defendants filed an answer denying the complaint’s material allegations, and asserted a counterclaim against us, against persons identified as certain of our officers or directors, and against GrowOpp, LLC and Tumbleweed Holdings, Inc. On November 19, 2014, defendants filed an amended counterclaim, including a prayer for monetary relief or damages in the sum of $9 million. The Company moved to dismiss the counterclaim and by opinion dated June 2, 2015, the Court granted the motion in part and dismissed counts one and two (for declaratory judgment as to an alleged partnership or joint venture, and for breach of fiduciary duty predicated upon those allegations), and denied the motion in part, leaving counts three and four of the counterclaim standing. The Court viewed the third and fourth claims as a single claim for unjust enrichment, in which recovery would be based on quantum merit, that is, upon the alleged value of any benefit conferred by defendants to us through alleged work and services rendered. In view of the fact that the pleading did not assign a particular value to that claim we are unable at present to advise what specific sum of money damages is sought. The Company did not challenge the fifth count of the counterclaim at this stage that seeks damages of $75,000 for alleged non-payment of the above-referenced promissory notes.
On August 19, 2015, Cathryn Kennedy, our former Chief Financial Officer, filed a Complaint against us in the District Court in Clark County, Nevada alleging that she was assigned new duties by us which constituted a termination without cause effective July 24, 2015, and that as a consequence thereof she is entitled to severance, vacation pay and stock compensation from us pursuant to her Employment Agreement dated November 18, 2014. The Company intends to vigorously defend itself against these allegations.
From time to time, the Company also becomes involved in certain legal proceedings and claims which arise in the ordinary course of business. In our opinion, based on consultations with outside counsel, the results of any of these ordinary course matters, individually and in the aggregate, are not expected to have a material effect on our results of operations, financial condition, or cash flows. As more information becomes available, if management should determine that an unfavorable outcome is probable on such a claim and that the amount of such probable loss that it will incur on that claim is reasonably estimable, we will record a reserve for the claim in question. If and when we record such a reserve is recorded, it could be material and could adversely impact our results of operations, financial condition, and cash flows.
Note 7 – Loss per Share
The Company’s basic loss per share has been calculated using the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. The Company had 46,104,790 and 29,520,288 potentially dilutive common shares at September 30, 2015 and March 31, 2015, respectively. However, such common stock equivalents were not included in the computation of diluted net loss per share as their inclusion would have been anti-dilutive.
9 |
ITEM 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following discussion and analysis contains “forward-looking statements,” as defined in the United States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terminology such as “may”, “will”, “should”, “could”, “expects”, “plans”, “intends”, “anticipates”, “believes”, “estimates”, “predicts” or “continue” , which list is not meant to be all-inclusive and other such negative terms and comparable technology. These forward-looking statements, include, without limitation, statements about our market opportunity, our strategies, competition, expected activities and expenditures as we pursue our business plan, and the adequacy of our available cash resources. Although we believe the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot guarantee future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements. Actual results may differ materially from the predictions discussed in these forward-looking statements. The economic environment within which we operate could materially affect our actual results. Additional factors that could materially affect these forward-looking statements and/or predictions include among other things: (1)product demand, market and customer acceptance of Growblox Sciences products, equipment and other goods, (ii) ability to obtain financing to expand its operations, (iii) ability to attract qualified personnel, (iv)competition pricing and development difficulties, (v) general industry and market conditions and growth rates, unexpected natural disasters, and other factors, which we have little or no control: and other factors discussed in the Company’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). The Company does not undertake any obligation to update forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances occurring after the date of this report.
The following discussion highlights the Company’s results of operations and the principal factors that have affected our financial condition, as well as our liquidity and capital resources for the periods described, and provides information that management believes is relevant for an assessment and understanding of the statements of financial condition and results of operations presented herein. The following discussion and analysis is based on the Company’s unaudited financial statements contained in this Quarterly Report, which we have prepared in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles. You should read this discussion and analysis together with such financial statements and the related notes thereto.
Overview
The Company is an innovative technology and solution company that converts the cannabis plant into medicines, therapies and treatments for a variety of ailments. The Company is developing and utilizing state of the art technologies in plant biology, cultivation and extraction techniques, combined with biotechnology, to produce consistent and measurable medical-grade cannabis, cannabis concentrates and cannabinoid therapies.
We seek to become a trusted producer of consistent and efficacious medicinal strains and products, combining both cannabinoids and terpenes, which we intend to market in those states within the United States and in other countries where the sale of medical cannabis products are permitted. In addition, subject to obtaining Food and Drug Administrative (FDA) certification, we intend to market our cannabinoid based drug discoveries on a world-wide basis.
On March 18, 2014, we purchased assets, including the Growblox™ cultivation technology, from our current Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Craig Ellins and his affiliated companies which resulted in a change in our corporate name on April 4, 2014, from Signature Exploration and Production Corporation to Growblox Sciences, Inc.
We were incorporated in the State of Delaware on April 4, 2001, under the name “Flagstick Venture, Inc.” On March 28, 2008, stockholders owning a majority of our outstanding common stock approved changing our then name “Signature Exploration and Production Corp.” as our business model had changed.
Plan of Operation
The Company believes that it is a leader in developing innovative technologies and solutions to convert the cannabis plant into medicines, therapies and treatments for a variety of ailments. We intend to conduct our business operations primarily through subsidiaries in three distinct operating units which we designate as our “Solutions,” “Sciences” and “Products” divisions.
10 |
Our Solutions division involves the development and use of our proprietary suite of controlled-climate indoor agricultural technology growing and cultivation Suites, which we call “TissueBLOX”, “GrowBLOX,” TM”CureBLOX” and “ExtractionLAB” (collectively, the “GrowBLOX Suites”). Our GrowBLOX Suites are engineered and designed to cultivate medical grade cannabis and create cGMP-certified plant extracts, and thereafter to enable us to process and manufacture a variety of pharmaceutical, nutraceutical and cosmeceutical formulations and products based on these certified raw ingredients.
Our Science division will seek to create and validate the effectiveness of proprietary formulations of active ingredients derived from the cannabis plant, in combination with “big data” driven clinical research and development programs to bring pain relief and potential cures to patients suffering from a variety of neurological and other diseases. Our Science division is currently engaged in preclinical testing of its biopharmaceutical cannabinoid product prototypes to begin future human clinical trials. In addition, we are seeking co-development partners to assist us with growing a phytocannabinoid-based biopharmaceutical product pipeline.
Our Products division will market the pharmaceutical, nutraceutical and cosmeceutical drugs and therapies produced by our Science division. In addition, our Products division will seek to dispense medical-grade cannabis solutions and products in states within the United States and in other countries where the sale and use of such products are permitted. We will operate our Products division and market its solutions and products through existing and future subsidiaries to be located in permitted jurisdictions.
Subsidiaries
Our majority owned subsidiary GB Sciences Nevada, LLC (“GBS Nevada”) leases a warehouse facility at 3550 W. Teco Avenue, Las Vegas Nevada. GBS Nevada holds a provisional certificate from the Division of Public & Behavioral Health of the Nevada Department of Health and Human Services to operate an establishment to cultivate medical cannabis at its Las Vegas location. The certificate is considered provisional until the establishment is in compliance with applicable local government requirements and has received a state business operating license. Granted in November 2014, the provisional certificate is subject to revocation if a medical marijuana establishment is not fully operational within 18 months from receipt.
GBS Nevada has applied for a permit or certificate to dispense medical cannabis at two locations in Clark County, Nevada, including one location within the City of Las Vegas, and a certificate to deliver medical grade cannabis throughout the State of Nevada. GBS Nevada is waiting for approval of such dispensary and delivery certificates by the State of Nevada. There can be no assurance that such certificates or permits will be issued, or if issued, that we or GBS Nevada will derive any significant revenues or profits from the cultivation, dispensing and delivery of medical cannabis within such County or City.
In March 2015, the Company and GBS Nevada entered into a binding memorandum (the “Memorandum”) with GBS Nevada Partners, LLC (“GBS Partners”), the local minority members of GBS Nevada. Under the terms of such agreement, our equity in GBS Nevada was to increase from 55% to 65%, GBS Nevada was to retain its existing certification to cultivate and grow cannabis and, if and when issued by Clark County and/or Las Vegas, Nevada, the delivery certification. If and when issued, the dispensary certification was to be assigned to an entity to be wholly-owned by the minority owners of GBS Nevada. In consideration for such assignment, the entity operating the dispensaries was to agree to purchase a minimum of 20% of its inventory of cannabis from GBS Nevada and pay to us 10% of all profits derived from its dispensary business. In addition, GBS Nevada was to retain the delivery certificate and the exclusive right to provide all delivery services on behalf of the dispensaries that are permitted by applicable state and local Nevada law. The delivery and dispensary certifications have yet to be issued and none of the actions contemplated by the Memorandum have been taken. Further to the determination to separate the business activities of GBS Nevada and ownership rights therein, on August 17, 2015, we entered into an agreement (the “Separation Agreement”) with GBS Partners, pursuant to which the rights and obligations of the parties contemplated by the Memorandum were expanded upon. Pursuant thereto, we will become the sole shareholder of GBS Nevada which will retain the Clark County cultivation license together with all related Supplemental Use Permits (“SUPs”) and state certificates. GBS Partners will receive the Clark County and City of Las Vegas dispensary location licenses together with related SUPs and state certificates. In connection therewith, the parties intend to enter into a ten year Consignment and Delivery Agreement (the “CDA”). For a more detailed description of the Separation Agreement and CDA see Part II, Item 5 of this Form 10-Q.
11 |
We are finalizing the production and testing of the Growblox™ Suites system, primarily at our Growblox Sciences, Puerto Rico, LLC, (GBSPR) facility which we opened in San Juan in April 2015. We shipped our first Growblox Suites from third party contractor production facilities located in China during November 2014. After testing and revisions are made, GBSPR intends to produce an initial round of demonstration production Suites in the second quarter of fiscal 2016.
Installment Loan Financing – Convertible Debenture
On May 12, 2015, we entered into a note purchase agreement, (the “NPA”) effective as of June 9, 2015, with Pacific Leaf Ventures, LP ( “Pacific Leaf”), pursuant to which Pacific Leaf agreed to make installment loans to us in the aggregate amount of $1.75 million (the “Loans”). The purpose of the financing is to provide for the acquisition and installation of an operating facility, equipment and other tangible assets by GBS Nevada. Such facility and equipment will be dedicated to the cultivation of cannabis and the extraction of oils and other constituents present in cannabis, subject at all times to Nevada legal requirements. Currently, the Company expects to achieve operating revenues in March or April 2016.
Under the NPA, Pacific Leaf made advances detailed in the table below resulting in total Loans to date of $1.5 million.
Advance amount | Cumulative amount | ||||||||
June 9, 2015 | $ | 100,000 | $ | 100,000 | |||||
July 3, 2015 | $ | 200,000 | $ | 300,000 | |||||
July 22, 2015 | $ | 200,000 | $ | 500,000 | |||||
August 3, 2015 | $ | 190,000 | $ | 690,000 | |||||
August 19, 2015 | $ | 95,000 | $ | 785,000 | |||||
August 21, 2015 | $ | 15,000 | $ | 800,000 | |||||
September 2, 2015 | $ | 200,000 | $ | 1,000,000 | |||||
September 30, 2015 | $ | 200,000 | $ | 1,200,000 | |||||
October 8, 2015 | $ | 200,000 | $ | 1,400,000 | |||||
October 27, 2015 | $ | 100,000 | $ | 1,500,000 |
Pursuant to the NPA, the Company was to receive an initial installment of $0.1 million on June 9, 2015, a second installment of $0.6 million on July 9, 2015, a third installment of $0.7 million on August 9, 2015 and a fourth and final installment of $0.35 million on September 9, 2015. The installment advances were designed to coincide with the Company’s construction and implementation needs for the cultivation facility for GBS Nevada. The note is convertible at the option of the holder into common shares of the Company at a conversion price of $0.50, subject to anti-dilution adjustments.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following table sets forth certain of our Statements of Operations data:
Three months ended | Six months ended | ||||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | ||||||||||||||||
2015 | 2014 | 2015 | 2014 | ||||||||||||||
Revenue | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | |||||||||
General and administrative expenses | 2,693,145 | 1,780,161 | 4,132,531 | 3,275,358 | |||||||||||||
Other income/(expense) | (10,571 | ) | 160 | (10,011 | ) | 334 | |||||||||||
Other | (985 | ) | — | (985 | ) | — | |||||||||||
Loss attributable to non-controlling interest | (23,704 | ) | (109,902 | ) | (204,160 | ) | (159,707 | ) | |||||||||
Net income/(loss) | (2,680,997 | ) | (1,670,099 | ) | (4,022,746 | ) | (3,115,317 | ) |
12 |
Comparison of the Three Months Ended September 30, 2015 and September 30, 2014
Revenues
The Company had no operating revenues for the three months ended September 30, 2015, and September 30, 2014, and has not achieved any operating revenues to date.
General and administrative expenses
General and administrative expenses increased $0.9 million to $2.7 million for the three months ended September 30, 2015 compared to $1.8 million for the three months ended September 30, 2014. The increase in primarily attributable to increases in professional fees, consulting, and advisory services related to our licensing procedures.
Other expense
Total other expense increased by $0.01 million compared to the same period in prior year primarily due to the recognition of accrued interest at September 30, 2015 pertaining to the loan proceeds received from Pacific Leaf.
Comparison of the Six Months Ended September 30, 2015 and September 30, 2014
Revenues
The Company had no operating revenues for the six months ended September 30, 2015, and September 30, 2014, and has not achieved any operating revenues to date.
General and administrative expenses
General and administrative expenses increased $0.9 million to $4.1 million for the six months ended September 30, 2015 compared to $3.3 million for the six months ended September 30, 2014. The increase in primarily attributable to increases in professional fees, consulting, and advisory services related to our licensing procedures combined with increase in utilities and facilities expenses due to additional facilities leased during the six months ended September 30, 2015.
Other expense
Total other expense increased by $0.01 million compared to the same period in prior year primarily due to the recognition of accrued interest at September 30, 2015 pertaining to the loan proceeds received from Pacific Leaf.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Current Liquidity
The Company will need additional capital to implement our strategies. There is no assurance that it will be able to raise the amount of capital needed for future growth plans. Even if financing is available, it may not be on terms that are acceptable. If unable to raise the necessary capital at the times required, the Company may have to materially change the business plan, including delaying implementation of aspects of the business plan or curtailing or abandoning the business plan. The Company represents a speculative investment and investors may lose all of their investment. In order to be able to achieve the strategic goals, the Company needs to further expand its business and financing activities. Based upon the cash position, it is necessary to raise additional capital by the end of the next quarter in order to continue to fund current operations. These factors raise substantial doubt about the ability to continue as a going concern. The Company is pursuing several alternatives to address this situation, including the raising of additional funding through equity or debt financings. In order to finance existing operations and pay current liabilities over the next twelve months, the Company will need to raise approximately $4-5 million of capital depending upon license status. No assurance can be given that the Company will be able to operate profitably on a consistent basis, or at all, in the future.
The principal sources of liquidity to date have been cash generated from sales of debt and equity securities and loans.
13 |
At September 30, 2015, cash was $0.3 million, other current assets excluding cash were $0.1 million and our working capital deficit was $2.4 million. At the same time, current liabilities were approximately $1.6 million, which consisted principally of $1.1 million in accounts payable, $1.6 million in notes payable, and $0.1 million in accrued liabilities. At March 31, 2015, cash was $0, and other current assets, excluding cash was $0.2 million. At the same time, current liabilities were $2.5 million, which consisted principally of $1.5 million in deferred compensation, $0.7 million in accounts payable, and $0.2 million in notes payable. The working capital deficit at March 31, 2015 was $2.3 million. The improvement in our liquidity position at September 30, 2015 compared to March 31, 2015 is primarily attributable to the decrease in deferred compensation.
Sources and Uses of Cash
Operating Activities
Net cash used in operating activities was $1.6 million for the six months ended September 30, 2015, as compared to net cash used of $2.4 million for the six months ended September 30, 2014. The decrease in net cash used in operations was primarily due to the increase in stock based compensation offset by an increase in net loss when compared to the prior period due to increase in general and administrative expenses.
Investing Activities
During the six months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, the Company used $0.7 million and $0.2 million, respectively, of cash in investing activities. The cash used in investing activities during the six months ended September 30, 2015 was primarily for the purchase of property and equipment.
Financing Activities
During the six months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, cash flows from financing activities totaled $2.6 million and $3.8 million, respectively. Cash flows from financing activities for the six months ended September 30, 2015 relate primarily to $1.2 million in proceeds from the issuance of debt securities, $1.2 million in proceeds from the issuance of common stock and warrants, and $0.3 million in proceeds from non-controlling interests.
GOING CONCERN
The unaudited interim financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis which assumes that the Company will be able to realize assets and discharge liabilities in the normal course of business for the foreseeable future. The Company has incurred losses since inception resulting in an accumulated deficit of approximately $18 million as of September 30, 2015, and further losses are anticipated in the development of the business raising substantial doubt about the ability to continue as a going concern. The ability to continue as a going concern is dependent upon generating profitable operations in the future and/or obtaining the necessary financing to meet obligations and repay liabilities arising from normal business operations when they come due. Management intends to finance operating costs over the next twelve months with existing cash on hand and/or private placements of debt and equity securities. The financials do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and reclassification of recorded asset amounts, or amounts and classifications of liabilities that might result from this uncertainty.
VARIABLES AND TRENDS
In the event the Company is able to obtain the necessary financing to progress with its business plan, the Company expects expenses to increase significantly to grow the business. Accordingly, the comparison of the financial data for the periods presented may not be a meaningful indicator of future performance and must be considered in light of these circumstances.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
A description of the Company’s significant accounting policies is included in Item 15 of its Annual Report on Form 10–K/A (Amendment No. 1) for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2015, as filed with the SEC.
14 |
ITEM 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
As a “smaller reporting company” as defined by Item 10 of Regulation S-K, the Company is not required to provide information required by this Item.
ITEM 4. Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
The Company maintains disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that material information required to be disclosed in the periodic reports filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or 1934 Act, is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms and to ensure that such information is accumulated and communicated to management, including the chief executive officer and chief financial officer as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. At the end of the quarter ended September 30, 2015, the Company carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of management, including the principal executive officer and the principal financial officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rule 13(a)-15(e) and Rule 15d-15(e) under the 1934 Act. Based on this evaluation, management concluded that as of September 30, 2015 the disclosure controls and procedures were not effective due to material weaknesses resulting from not having a functioning audit committee consisting of independent board members.
Limitations on Effectiveness of Controls and Procedures
Management, including the Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer), does not expect that disclosure controls and procedures will prevent all errors and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the Company have been detected. These inherent limitations include, but are not limited to, the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management override of the control. The design of any system of controls also is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions. Over time, controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected.
Changes in Internal Controls
During the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2015, there have been no changes in the internal controls over financial reporting that have materially affected or are reasonably likely to materially affect the internal controls over financial reporting.
On April 2, 2014, we commenced an action in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York captioned Signature Exploration and Production Corporation v. GCM Administrative Services, LLC, Strategic Turnaround Equity Partners, L.P. (Cayman), Seth M. Lukash, and Gary Herman, 14 Civ. 02280 (ER) (the “Action”). After the change of name of Signature Exploration and Production Corporation, the caption was amended to substitute GrowBlox Sciences, Inc. as the plaintiff. The complaint in the Action sought a declaratory judgment that neither Lukash nor Herman was entitled to receive any interest in, including any shares of stock of, Growblox pursuant to certain share conversion rights held under promissory notes in the aggregate amount of $75,000, given by a related party of ours to the entity defendants GCM and Strategic.
15 |
On May 9, 2014, defendants filed an answer denying the complaint’s material allegations, and asserted a counterclaim against us, against persons identified as certain of our officers or directors, and against GrowOpp, LLC and Tumbleweed Holdings, Inc. On November 19, 2014, defendants filed an amended counterclaim, including a prayer for monetary relief or damages in the sum of $9 million. We moved to dismiss the counterclaim and by opinion dated June 2, 2015, the Court granted the motion in part and dismissed counts one and two (for declaratory judgment as to an alleged partnership or joint venture, and for breach of fiduciary duty predicated upon those allegations), and denied the motion in part, leaving counts three and four of the counterclaim standing. The Court viewed the third and fourth claims as a single claim for unjust enrichment, in which recovery would be based on quantum meruit, that is, upon the alleged value of any benefit conferred by defendants to us through alleged work and services rendered. In view of the fact that the pleading did not assign a particular value to that claim we are unable at present to advise what specific sum of money damages is sought. We did not challenge the fifth count of the counterclaim at this stage that seeks damages of $75,000 for alleged non-payment of the above-referenced promissory notes.
We intend we vigorously contest the remaining claim of the defendants as we do not believe that the defendants provided any benefit or value to us or GrowOpp, LLC and Tumbleweed Holdings, Inc., the predecessor entities affiliated with Craig Ellins.
On August 19, 2015, Cathryn Kennedy, our former Chief Financial Officer, filed a Complaint against us in the District Court in Clark County, Nevada alleging that she was assigned new duties by us which constituted a termination without cause effective July 24, 2015, and that as a consequence thereof she is entitled to severance, vacation pay and stock compensation from us pursuant to her Employment Agreement dated November 18, 2014. We intend to vigorously contest the claims of Ms. Kennedy as we believe them to be wholly without merit.
There are no material changes from the risk factors previously disclosed in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K/A (Amendment No. 1) for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2015, as filed with the SEC.
ITEM 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
Common Stock
On September 30, 2015, we issued 95,250 shares of our restricted common stock to one person in connection with the conversion, effective August 15, 2015, of $19,025 in debt owed by us to such person at a conversion price of $0.20 per share.
On September 30, 2015, we issued 150,000 shares of our restricted common stock to one person in connection with the conversion, effective May 15, 2015, of $30,000 in debt owed by us to such person at a conversion price of $0.20 per share.
On September 30, 2015 we issued 796,000 shares of our restricted common stock to one person in consideration of consulting services.
On September 30, 2015 we issued 19,500 shares of our restricted common stock to one person pursuant to a July 23, 2015 Investor Relations Consulting Agreement (the “IRCA”). The IRCA has a term of 12 months under which we are paying to consultant 6,500 shares per month. The 19,500 shares represent payment for the first three months of the IRCA.
In October 2015, we issued 333,333 shares of our restricted common stock to one person at a price of $0.30 per share or an aggregate of $100,000.
Options
On August 1, 2015, we issued 300,000 stock options under our 2014 Equity Incentive Plan to Sandra Tiffany. The options are exercisable upon vesting for a period of 10 years from issuance at an exercise price of $0.34 per share.
16 |
On August 10, 2015, we issued 600,000 stock options under our 2014 Equity Incentive plan to John Poss. The options are exercisable upon vesting for a period of 10 years from issuance at an exercise price of $0.30 per share.
On October 1, 2015 we issued 111,000 stock options under our 2014 Equity Incentive Plan to a consultant. The options are exercisable upon vesting for a period of 10 years from issuance at an exercise price of $0.30 per share.
Convertible Note
We entered into a Note Purchase Agreement, dated May 12, 2015 and effective as of June 8, 2015, with Pacific Leaf Ventures, LP (“Pacific Leaf”), pursuant to which Pacific Leaf has made installment loans (the “Loans”) to us in the aggregate amount of $1.5 million and is required to make $250,000 in additional Loans. To evidence the Loans, we issued to Pacific Leaf a 6% senior secured convertible promissory note (the “Note”), bearing interest at the rate of 6% per annum, payable quarterly. All outstanding principal and interest due under the Note is due and payable on May 12, 2020. We are required to prepay the outstanding principal amount of the Note on a quarterly basis in an amount equal to 50% of the cash flow (accrued EBITDA) of GBS Nevada attributable to our percentage interest in GBS Nevada. Pacific Leaf has the option, at any time and from time to time, prior to the date on which is made the payment in full of the Note, to convert all or any portion of the outstanding principal amount of the Note into shares of our common stock at an initial conversion price equal to $0.50 per share.
All of the foregoing securities were issued in reliance on the exemption from registration provided by Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933 (the “Securities Act”) and/or Rule 506 of Regulation D under the Securities Act, as amended.
ITEM 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
None.
ITEM 4. Mine Safety Disclosures
Not Applicable.
CFO Appointment
Effective July 27, 2015, the board of directors hired John Poss as our Chief Financial Officer.
Mr. Poss has over 30 years of experience working as a consultant to companies facing major transitions and transformations. Mr. Poss began his career in the Washington, D.C. office of Arthur Andersen & Co. and has served as Chief Executive Officer, Chief Operating Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Technology Officer of both public and private companies in such diverse industries as homebuilding, mining, telecommunications, manufacturing, logistics, construction lending and mortgage banking. For the past twenty months Mr. Poss served as Chief Executive Officer of Experiential Teaching Online Corp., an educational content developer and for four years prior thereto owned and operated his own consulting firm. Mr. Poss has also has worked extensively internationally, successfully negotiating agreements in countries throughout Asia, Europe and the Americas. Mr. Poss graduated from the University of Texas in 1974 with a degree in accounting.
By letter agreement dated August 10, 2015, we confirmed the terms of the employment of Mr. Poss as our Chief Financial Officer. The term of employment is one year subject to automatic extensions for additional one year periods unless either party chooses to terminate such employment. We may terminate the Employment Agreement at any time with or without cause. If we terminate the Employment Agreement without cause we are required to pay three months’ severance to Mr. Poss if the termination takes place during the first year of employment, four months’ severance if the termination takes place during the second year of employment and six months’ severance if the termination takes place during the third year or a subsequent year of employment. No severance payments are due in the case of a termination for cause. Similar severance provisions apply to a termination by Mr. Poss for good reason but not to a termination by Mr. Poss without good reason. We are paying Mr. Poss a monthly salary of $10,000 per month. In addition, in August 2015 we issued 600,000 options to Mr. Poss under our 2014 Equity Incentive Plan. The options are exercisable upon vesting for a period of 10 years from issuance for the purchase of shares of our common stock at a price of $0.30 per share. The options vest ratably on a monthly basis in equal installments over the course of 30 months commencing on the seventh month of the employment period. In the event that Mr. Poss’ employment is terminated by us for cause or by Mr. Poss without good reason, all unvested options at the time of termination will be cancelled.
17 |
In the event of a Change of Control, as such term is defined in the 2014 Equity Incentive Plan, all of the options issued to Mr. Poss shall vest immediately. The number of options issuable to Mr. Poss is subject to increase within 6 months of the commencement of Mr. Poss’ employment at the discretion of our Board of Directors. At the end of the third year of employment, the compensation payable to Mr. Poss shall be renegotiated in good faith by the parties.
Separation Agreement between GBS Sciences Nevada, LLC and GBS Nevada Partners, LLC
In March 2015, we and GBS Sciences Nevada, LLC (“GBS Nevada”) entered into a binding memorandum (the “Memorandum”) with GBS Nevada Partners, LLC (“GBS Partners”), the minority member of GBS Nevada. Under the terms of such agreement, our equity in GBS Nevada was to increase from 55% to 65%, and GBS Nevada was to retain its existing certification to cultivate and grow cannabis and, if and when issued by Clark County and/or Las Vegas, Nevada, the delivery certification. It was further agreed that, if and when issued, the dispensary certification would be assigned to an entity to be wholly-owned by GBS Partners. In consideration for such assignment, the entity operating the dispensaries was to agree to purchase a minimum of 20% of its inventory of cannabis from GBS Nevada and pay to us 10% of all profits derived from its dispensary business. In addition, GBS Nevada was to retain the delivery certificate and the exclusive right to provide all delivery services on behalf of the dispensaries that are permitted by applicable state and local Nevada law. The actions contemplated by the Memorandum were never taken because the delivery and dispensary certifications have yet to be issued and our ownership of GBS Nevada remains at 55%.
On August 17, 2015, however, we entered into a letter agreement with GB Partners to expand on the actions contemplated by the Memorandum and to effect an ownership separation. Pursuant thereto, we are to become the sole shareholder of GBS Nevada which will retain the Clark County cultivation license and state certificates together with all related SUPs and state certificates. GBS Partners will receive the Clark County and City of Las Vegas dispensary location licenses, together with related SUPs and state certificates. In connection with the foregoing, the parties agreed to enter into a Consignment and Delivery Agreement (“CDA”) with a term of ten years subject to optional extensions for additional five year periods. The initial extension is automatic assuming neither party is in breach of the CDA. Further extensions thereafter, will require mutual agreement of the parties.
Pursuant to the CDA, GBS Partners will provide GBS Nevada with 20% of its most prominent in-store retail merchandising shelf space for consignment sales. All after-tax consignment sale proceeds resulting therefrom will be split equally between GBS Partners and GBS Nevada. The CDA will further provide that GBS Nevada will establish and bear all expenses of operating and administrating a local delivery service from the dispensary locations. All product sold through such services will be treated as a consignment sale and as such, all after-tax delivery consignment sale proceeds will be split between GBS Nevada and GBS Partners on an 80/20 basis. The service may also include non-GBS Nevada product to be sold through the service from GBS Partners’ county dispensary and in such event, GBS Nevada will retain 20% of the initial sales price thereof.
The CDA will also provide for GBS Nevada to receive a non-dilutable 10% interest in the distributions, profits and equity of all entities that own or have the right to 100% of all dispensary operations. GBS Nevada will also have the right to tag along with any sale or transfer of any direct or derivative interest in the dispensary operation on a pari passu basis.
GBS Partners is required to reimburse GBS Nevada approximately $307,000 for expenses incurred in connection with the application and issuance of an approved provisional state certificate from both the Las Vegas and Clark County dispensaries. Approximately $61,000 of such amount is payable upon the governmental approval of the license transfers. The balance of such amount is payable from the first sale proceeds from dispensary operations and in all events no later than 2 years from the date the county dispensary receives its final certificate of occupancy (the “County Certificate”) and opens for business. In the event that the County Certificate is not issued, GBS Partners can defer payment of approximately $153,000 for a maximum of two additional years. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if GBS Partners finances the dispensary operations with a third party resulting in the receipt of net proceeds by GBS Partners, then all expense amounts shall become immediately due and payable.
18 |
Management Agreement between Growblox Sciences, Inc. and Compassionate Team of Las Vegas LLC
On August 17, 2015, the Company entered into a Medical Marijuana Establishment Management Agreement with Compassionate Team of Las Vegas LLC (“Compassionate Team”) pursuant to the term of which the Company agreed to manage the operation of the Medical Marijuana Establishment for cultivation, located at 2601 Highland Drive, Las Vegas, Clark County, Nevada (“Real Property”). The responsibility and control of all operations shall reside with Compassionate Team as licensee. Growblox Sciences agrees to provide all capital funding to the Medical Marijuana Establishment for cultivation to become fully operational. Growblox Sciences will receive 70% of the total profits in connection with management services provided which will be distributed on a quarterly basis. The effectiveness of the management agreement is depended upon Compassionate Team providing Growblox Sciences with written proof of Provisional Medical Marijuana Establishment Registration Certificate for cultivation and evidence of approved Special Use Permit and a Compliance Permit at the Real Property.
Issuance and Transfer of Provisional Cultivation and Production Certificates
On August 14, 2015, Sandra Tiffany, the managing member of GWGA, LLC (“GWGA”), LVIG Holdings LLC (“LVIG”) and LVOP Holdings LLC (“LVOP”) agreed to transfer the State of Nevada, Division of Public and Behavioral Health (the “Division”) provisional Cultivation Establishment Registration Certificates to be issued to GWGA and LVIG and the Division’s provisional Production Establishment Registration Certificate to be issued to LVOP to us at such time that the Division allows for the transfer of such certificates. The certificates have been issued and transferred to Ms. Tiffany by the respective entities but have yet to be transferred by Ms. Tiffany to us. In connection with the issuance of such certificates by the Division, in August 2015, we have agreed to issue 125,000 shares of our restricted common stock to Ms. Tiffany. We have agreed to issue an additional 125,000 shares of our restricted common stock to Ms. Tiffany at the time that the issued certificates are transferred to us. We further agreed to employ Ms. Tiffany as the General Manager of GB Sciences Nevada LLC effective as of August 1, 2015.
In connection with the transfers to Ms. Tiffany of the provisional cultivation and production certificate, Ms. Tiffany has or will make payment to her former partners in the aggregate amount of $86,500. We have agreed by letter agreement dated September 23, 2015 to reimburse Ms. Tiffany for these payments on or before January 1, 2016 and to pay Ms. Tiffany an additional $10,000 in consideration of her work related to the project.
Tiffany Employment Agreement
On August 1, 2015, we entered into a one-year Executive Employment Agreement (the “Employment Agreement”) with Sandra Tiffany (the “Executive”) pursuant to which the Executive serves as the General Manager of our subsidiary, GB Sciences Nevada, LLC. The Employment Agreement extends automatically for additional one-year terms unless either party notifies the other, at least 15 days prior to the end of the then existing term, of their determination not to renew. We may terminate the Employment Agreement at any time with or without cause. If we terminate the Employment Agreement without cause we are required to pay three months’ severance to the Executive if the termination takes place during the first year of employment, four months’ severance if the termination takes place during the second year of employment and six months’ severance if the termination takes place during the third year or any subsequent year of employment. No severance payments are due in the case of a termination by us for cause. We must provide the Executive with advance notice in the case of a termination for cause in which we identify the manner in which we believe the Executive has failed to perform her duties or identify the other basis for such termination.
The Executive may terminate the Employment Agreement with or without good reason by providing us with notice at least 10 days prior to the date of termination. If the termination is not for good reason, we have no severance obligations to the Executive. If the termination is for good reason, the same severance requirements applicable to a termination by us without cause shall apply.
The Executive’s duties under the Employment Agreement include finalizing business plans and budgets, communicating and working with governmental agencies to assure compliance with applicable rules and regulations, coordinating production, overseeing product sale and distribution, and developing operating procedures.
19 |
The Executive is also responsible for managing cultivation and production facilities and the recruiting, hiring and training of employees.
The Executive is receiving an initial annual base salary of $72,000 which is subject to review on an annual basis for possible increase as determined by our CEO and/or Board of Directors. The Executive also received 300,000 stock options under our 2014 Equity Incentive Plan, each exercisable for the purchase of a share of our common stock at an exercise price of $0.34 per share. The options vest ratably on a monthly basis over the course of the 30 month period commencing in the seventh month of employment. In the event that the Agreement is terminated by us for cause or by the Executive without good reason, all unvested options at the time of termination will be cancelled. At the end of the third year of employment, the compensation payable to the Executive shall be renegotiated in good faith by the parties.
The Employment Agreement also provides for Executive’s participation in the Company’s Nevada Operations Bonus Pool (the “Bonus Pool”) to be established on or before December 31, 2015. The Executive’s participation in the Bonus Pool will allow the Executive to receive a bonus in the amount of her annual salary if our Nevada operations achieve 90% of annual projected earnings. If and when the Nevada operations achieve 100% or more of annual projected earnings, Executive shall be entitled to additional compensation in an amount to be mutually determined by the Executive and our CEO.
Pacific Leaf Note Purchase Agreement
We entered into a Note Purchase Agreement, dated May 12, 2015 and effective as of June 8, 2015 (the “Effective Date”), with Pacific Leaf Ventures, LP (the “Lender” or “Pacific Leaf”), pursuant to which the Lender agreed to make installment loans to us in the aggregate amount of $1.75 million (the “Loans”). The purpose of the financing is to provide for the acquisition and installation of an operating facility, equipment and other tangible assets by GB Nevada. Such facility and equipment will be dedicated to the cultivation of cannabis and the extraction of oils and other constituents present in cannabis, subject at all times to Nevada legal requirements.
GBS Nevada holds a provisional certificate from the Division of Public & Behavioral Health of the Nevada Department of Health and Human Services to operate an establishment to cultivate medical cannabis at 3550 West Teco Avenue, in Clark County Nevada. The certificate is considered provisional until the establishment is in compliance with applicable local government requirements and has received a state business operating license. Granted in November 2014, the provisional certificate is subject to revocation if a medical marijuana establishment is not fully operational within 18 months from receipt.
Pursuant to the terms and conditions of the Note Purchase Agreement (the “Agreement”), the Lender has made advances to us as of November 6, 2015 in the aggregate amount of $1.5 million and is required to make additional advances in the amount of $250,000. Currently, the Company expects to achieve operating revenues in March or April 2016.The obligation of the Lender to make each periodic installment advance in connection with the Agreement was and is to subject to satisfaction by us of certain conditions, including compliance with certain covenants and with Nevada legal requirements and no material adverse events. The proceeds of the Agreement can be used only for the purchase of assets, construction, and leasehold improvements related to the cultivation facility. Part of the assets purchased with the proceeds of the Agreement will include extraction equipment developed by us in cooperation with Pacific Leaf. The Agreement is secured by a first lien and security interest on (i) the equipment of GBS Nevada, including the equipment purchased with the proceeds of the Agreement, and (ii) our equity in GBS Nevada.
To evidence the Agreement, the Company issued to the Lender a 6% senior secured convertible promissory note, bearing interest at a fixed rate of 6% per annum, payable quarterly (the “Note”). All outstanding principal and interest due under the Note is due and payable on May 12, 2020. The Company is required to repay the outstanding principal amount of the Note on a quarterly basis in an amount equal to 50% of the cash flow (accrued EBITDA) of GBS Nevada attributable to the percentage interest in GBS Nevada.
Pacific Leaf has the option, at any time and from time to time, prior to the date on which the Company makes payment in full on the Note, to convert all or any portion of the outstanding principal amount of the Note into shares of common stock at an initial conversion price equal to $0.50. Pacific Leaf and any subsequent holders of the note have or will be granted rights to piggyback registration on all shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of the Note.
20 |
In a related matter, the Company also entered into an exclusive perpetual license agreement with Pacific Leaf to make use of Pacific Leaf’s intellectual property for the cultivation of cannabis and extraction of oils and other strains of cannabis that it has developed or acquired (the “Pacific Leaf Intellectual Property”) for the sole use of GBS Nevada in its operations within the State of Nevada; it being understood that any other use of the Pacific Leaf Intellectual Property requires the approval of the licensor.
The Company believes that the rights to the Pacific Leaf Intellectual Property will give GBS Nevada a significant competitive advantage in the Nevada cannabis market. In consideration for the license of the Pacific Leaf Intellectual Property, the Company has agreed to pay Pacific Leaf for a period of ten years out of all periodic distributions received from GBS Nevada (based on the percentage equity in GBS Nevada) a royalty at the rate of approximately 7.7% of the gross revenue earned by the Company from GBS Nevada for the initial five years, and a royalty at the rate of approximately 3.85% of gross sales revenues of GBS Nevada in years six through ten.
As part of the Pacific Leaf license, the Company was also granted the exclusive perpetual right in Nevada to use certain proprietary techniques developed by Pacific Leaf for the extraction of oils from the product grown in the Nevada facility, using the extraction equipment financed by the proceeds of the Pacific Leaf loan. In connection therewith, the Company has agreed to pay a royalty of $2.00 per extracted gram for a period of five years.
There can be no assurance that:
· | the Company will be able to comply with the covenants under the Pacific Leaf Note Purchase Agreement so as to enable the Company to receive all of the anticipated funding thereunder; |
· | there will not be cost over-runs in connection with the purchase and/or lease of the cultivation facility and related equipment resulting in the proceeds of the Loan being insufficient to enable GBS Nevada to complete the installation and commence production of cannabis for medical purposes; |
· | a state business license to operate the medical cannabis facility will be issued, or that the Company or GBS Nevada will not violate existing or newly imposed state, county and city regulations in Nevada that would significant restrict or prohibit its proposed business activities; or |
· | the proposed business to be conducted by GBS Nevada with the proceeds of the Loan will prove profitable to the Company or its subsidiaries. |
A default by the Company under the Note Purchase Agreement could have a material adverse effect on the business.
Although the proposed and actual business activities of GBS Nevada are not illegal within the State of Nevada, the production and sale of cannabis products violate federal laws as presently constituted.
Agreement with Growblox Sciences, Puerto Rico
On May 7, 2015, the Company entered into certain agreements with Growblox Sciences, Puerto Rico, LLC, a limited liability company organized under the laws of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico (“GBSPR”). GBSPR was formed and is being capitalized primarily by Cesar Cordero-Kruger, a prominent business executive and resident of Puerto Rico.
Under the terms of a commercialization agreement between the Company and GBSPR, the Company has granted to GBSPR the exclusive world-wide rights to all of our technology and intellectual property to:
(a) manufacture, produce, lease and license our indoor series of controlled-climate indoor agricultural technology growing and cultivation chambers engineered and designed to produce medical grade cannabis and other plant extracts (the “Growblox Chambers”) and provide remote diagnostic monitoring and servicing of the Growing Chambers to third party growers and processors of hemp, cannabis and other plant extracts;
(b) sell to the Company, for resale and distribution throughout the world, in all territories and jurisdictions (including states in the United States) where the sale and use of such products are permitted, any and all pharmaceutical raw materials and products as well as neutraceuticals and cosmeceutical skin care products derived from medical-grade cannabis and hemp raw materials that were cultivated and grown in Growblox Chambers;
21 |
(c) use the trademarks and packaging developed by the Company to be used to identify all cannabis products grown in Growblox Chambers;
(d) provide technical support for the licensing, permitting and other requisite applications for the cannabis business in Puerto Rico and related markets;
(e) access all research supporting the Growblox Chambers and educational materials previously developed or collected in the future by the Company to the extent associated or used with GBSPR Business; and
(f) access all of the dispensary related technology, proprietary information and contacts including, without limitation, technology, proprietary information, and contacts.
All rights not granted to GBSPR under the commercialization agreement are retained by the Company and include the (i) right to conduct pre-clinical and clinical trials and ongoing research and development to create cannabis-based therapies for specific clinical conditions based on an understanding of how cannabinoids interact with the natural receptors in the human body; (ii) formulation of targeted combinations of active ingredients to combat specific conditions and diseases; (iii) use of proprietary cannabinoid formulations, to develop palliative and curative pharmaceutical treatment options and products for patients with certain critical diseases; (iv) exclusive right to sell, dispense and market cannabinoid and hemp based pharmaceutical raw materials and products as well as neutraceuticals and cosmeceutical skin care products throughout the world, either directly, through distributors or under other agreements with third parties; and (iv) right, directly, or through one or more of our subsidiaries (other than GBSPR), to cultivate, grow, dispense and sell medical-grade cannabis or marijuana in Nevada and Colorado.
To the extent that GBSPR produces and sells to the Company for resale or distribution pharmaceutical raw materials and products, neutraceuticals and/or cosmeceutical skin care products derived from plants cultivated and grown in Growblox Chambers (collectively, the “Finished Products”), the Company has agreed to establish mutually acceptable transfer pricing between GBSPR and the Company for such Finished Products; failing which agreement, an independent third party will arbitrate such pricing and pricing policies. In the event that GBSPR is unable to fulfill 100% of the requirements of the customers for Growblox Chambers or Finished Products, GBSPR will subcontract such production to third parties that are reasonably acceptable to the Company. Neither the Company nor GBSPR may commercially sell (as opposed to leasing or licensing) Growblox Chambers without the consent of both parties.
The grant of rights under the commercialization agreement was subject to the condition that GBSPR obtain not less than $1.25 million of equity financing by no later than September 30, 2015; failing which we could unilaterally terminate the agreement. If we decide to terminate the agreement, Cesar Cordero-Kruger who has invested the initial $300,000 of capital to GBSPR, will be responsible for obtaining the remaining $950,000 of capital. Mr. Cordero-Kruger, on behalf of GBSPR, intended to raise the equity financing in Puerto Rico but, due in part to delays in the development of our business, was not able to do so. We are presently discussing with Mr. Cordero-Kruger an extension of the equity financing timeline.
Upon consummation of the contemplated $1.25 million capitalization of GBSPR, the Company will be the majority owner of its equity, owning approximately 66% of the GBSPR membership interests; Mr. Cordero-Kruger will own approximately 15.9% of such membership interests, Dr. Andrea Small-Howard, a director and chief technology officer will own approximately 2.1% of such membership interests and Joseph J. Bianco, a GBSPR Board member will own approximately 8.3% of such membership interests. The remaining percentage of ownership of such membership interests will be owned by other non-related party investors.
Under the terms of the GBSPR operating agreement, Mr. Cordero-Kruger is the managing member of GBSPR, entitled to designate a majority of the five member board of managers of GBSPR, and is delegated with the authority to manage the business of GBSPR, subject only to certain major decisions defined in the operating agreement (dealing primarily with matters of finance, related party transactions and amending agreements among the parties) which require unanimous approval of the Board or approval by the Company. The Company has designated Craig Ellins, President and CEO, and Joseph J. Bianco as members of the GBSPR Board.
22 |
The operating agreement also provides that the investors (including Mr. Cordero-Kruger) who have provided the maximum $1.25 million of capital to GBSPR will hold Class A membership interests that entitle them to exclusive rights to certain research and development tax credits available to residents of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico. The Company and its affiliates and associates hold Class B membership interests, which are identical to the Class A membership interest, other than the right to the research and development tax credits.
Assuming it completes its initial $1.25 million capitalization, GBSPR may seek to raise an additional $4.75 million of capital in 2015 or thereafter to enable it to expand its business activities. The operating agreement provides that the terms of such additional financing, if undertaken, have to be unanimously approved by all members of the GBSPR board, including the Company’s designees. Under certain conditions, after three years, the operating agreement provides that Mr. Cordero-Kruger or his designated members of the GBSPR board may require the Company to acquire the remaining equity of GBSPR under a formula or consummate another liquidity event for the members of GBSPR.
There can be no assurance that the proposed initial $1.25 million capitalization of GBSPR will be consummated, or that the contemplated $4.75 million of additional financing will be undertaken or completed upon terms and conditions that are acceptable to GBSPR, if at all. There can also be no assurance that:
· | the proposed business activities of GBSPR will be successful; |
· | the ongoing research and development will result in pre-clinical trials or clinical trials that will result in the production of any pharmaceutical or related products that will either be commercially accepted or permitted to be sold by the FDA or any other state or federal regulatory authority; or |
· | the Company will ever be able to purchase or be permitted to resell medical grade cannabis or other Finished Products. |
Trenk Consulting Agreement
Effective October 1, 2015 we entered into a 3-year Consulting Agreement (the “Consulting Agreement”) with Steven Trenk (the “Consultant”) pursuant to which Consultant will assist us in the development of our Cannaplex project. The Cannaplex project involves the syndication of an 80% interest in the physical property owned by Consultant and leased to us for purposes of cultivating marijuana to be used for medical purposes and creating a center for related professional and/or entertainment services. Consultant will assist with arranging for third-party financing needed for such syndication. The Consulting Agreement can be cancelled by mutual agreement if the parties determine that the Cannaplex project cannot be funded or is unable to proceed for other reasons. The Consulting Agreement may also be terminated by us for cause. In connection with the services to be provided by the Consultant under the Consulting Agreement, we are obligated to issue to Consultant upon execution of the Consulting Agreement and on the first and second anniversaries thereof, options to purchase 111,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $0.30 per share. The initial 111,000 options were issued by us on October 1, 2015.
Share Cancellations
During the three months ended September 30, 2015, the Company cancelled 892,400 shares of common stock. 392,400 of the cancelled shares represented shares that had been erroneously issued upon vesting of options that were never exercised. 100,000 of the cancelled shares represented the excess number of shares that had been erroneously issued under an employment agreement. 400,000 of the shares represented shares issued under an employment agreement which were subject to forfeiture in the event that the employee (Cathryn Kennedy) ceased to remain in the employment of the Company on certain specified dates which proved to be the case.
23 |
In reviewing the agreements included as exhibits to this Form 10-Q, please remember that they are included to provide you with information regarding their terms and are not intended to provide any other factual or disclosure information about the Company or the other parties to the agreements. The agreements may contain representations and warranties by each of the parties to the applicable agreement. These representations and warranties have been made solely for the benefit of the parties to the applicable agreement and:
· | should not in all instances be treated as categorical statements of fact, but rather as a way of allocating the risk to one of the parties if those statements prove to be inaccurate; |
· | have been qualified by disclosures that were made to the other party in connection with the negotiation of the applicable agreement, which disclosures are not necessarily reflected in the agreement; |
· | may apply standards of materiality in a way that is different from what may be viewed as material to you or other investors; and |
· | were made only as of the date of the applicable agreement or such other date or dates as may be specified in the agreement and are subject to more recent developments. |
Accordingly, these representations and warranties may not describe the actual state of affairs as of the date they were made or at any other time. Additional information about the Company may be found elsewhere in this Form 10-Q and the Company’s other public filings, which are available without charge through the SEC’s website at http://www.sec.gov.
The following exhibits are included as part of this report:
Exhibit Number |
Description of Exhibit | |
10.1 | Employment Agreement between Registrant and John Poss dated August 10, 2015 | |
10.2 | Employment Agreement between Registrant and Sandra Tiffany dated August 14, 2015 | |
10.3 | Separation Agreement dated August 17, 2015 between GBS Sciences Nevada, LLC and GBS Nevada Partners, LLC | |
10.4 | Medical Marijuana Establishment Management Agreement | |
31.1 | Certification of Principal Executive Officer and Pursuant to Rule 13a-14 | |
31.2 | Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14 | |
32.1* | CEO Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act | |
32.2* |
CFO Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act Contract with Mr. John Poss, Chief Financial Officer | |
101.INS | XBRL Instance Document | |
101.SCH | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document | |
101.CAL | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document | |
101.LAB | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Labels Linkbase Document | |
101.PRE | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document | |
101.DEF | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document |
* This certification is being furnished and shall not be deemed “filed” with the SEC for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section, and shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the registrant specifically incorporates it by reference
24 |
In accordance with the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
GROWBLOX SCIENCES, INC. | ||
November 17, 2015 | By: | /s/ Craig Ellins |
Craig Ellins, Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) | ||
GROWBLOX SCIENCES, INC. | ||
November 17, 2015 | By: | /s/ John Poss |
John Poss, Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer) |
25 |