Gen Digital Inc. - Quarter Report: 2013 June (Form 10-Q)
Table of Contents
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-Q
(Mark One)
x | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the Quarterly Period Ended June 28, 2013
or
¨ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the Transition Period from to
Commission File Number 000-17781
Symantec Corporation
(Exact name of the registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware | 77-0181864 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
(I.R.S. employer Identification no.) | |
350 Ellis Street, Mountain View, California |
94043 | |
(Address of principal executive offices) | (Zip Code) |
Registrants telephone number, including area code:
(650) 527-8000
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated filer, accelerated filer, and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer | x | Accelerated filer | ¨ | |||
Non-accelerated filer | ¨ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) | Smaller reporting company | ¨ |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x
Shares of Symantec common stock, $0.01 par value per share, outstanding as of July 26, 2013: 698,621,994 shares.
Table of Contents
FORM 10-Q
Quarterly Period Ended June 28, 2013
TABLE OF CONTENTS
2
Table of Contents
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
June 28, | March 29, | |||||||
2013 | 2013 * | |||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||
(In millions) | ||||||||
ASSETS | ||||||||
Current assets: |
||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 3,749 | $ | 4,685 | ||||
Short-term investments |
34 | 62 | ||||||
Trade accounts receivable, net |
744 | 1,031 | ||||||
Inventories, net |
17 | 24 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes |
172 | 169 | ||||||
Deferred commissions |
134 | 130 | ||||||
Other current assets |
329 | 315 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total current assets |
5,179 | 6,416 | ||||||
Property and equipment, net |
1,102 | 1,122 | ||||||
Intangible assets, net |
890 | 977 | ||||||
Goodwill |
5,841 | 5,841 | ||||||
Long-term deferred commissions |
30 | 29 | ||||||
Other long-term assets |
109 | 123 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total assets |
$ | 13,151 | $ | 14,508 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY | ||||||||
Current liabilities: |
||||||||
Accounts payable |
$ | 274 | $ | 334 | ||||
Accrued compensation and benefits |
321 | 422 | ||||||
Deferred revenue |
3,292 | 3,496 | ||||||
Current portion of long-term debt |
| 997 | ||||||
Other current liabilities |
318 | 318 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total current liabilities |
4,205 | 5,567 | ||||||
Long-term debt |
2,094 | 2,094 | ||||||
Long-term deferred revenue |
520 | 521 | ||||||
Long-term deferred tax liabilities |
443 | 426 | ||||||
Long-term income taxes payable |
327 | 318 | ||||||
Other long-term obligations |
65 | 60 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total liabilities |
7,654 | 8,986 | ||||||
Commitments and contingencies (Note 7) |
||||||||
Stockholders equity: |
||||||||
Common stock |
7 | 7 | ||||||
Additional paid-in capital |
7,153 | 7,313 | ||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
177 | 199 | ||||||
Accumulated deficit |
(1,840 | ) | (1,997 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total stockholders equity |
5,497 | 5,522 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
$ | 13,151 | $ | 14,508 | ||||
|
|
|
|
* | Derived from audited financial statements. |
The accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these financial statements.
3
Table of Contents
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
June 28, | June 29, | |||||||
2013 | 2012 | |||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||
(In millions, except per share data) | ||||||||
Net revenue: |
||||||||
Content, subscription, and maintenance |
$ | 1,520 | $ | 1,475 | ||||
License |
189 | 193 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total net revenue |
1,709 | 1,668 | ||||||
Cost of revenue: |
||||||||
Content, subscription, and maintenance |
263 | 249 | ||||||
License |
22 | 17 | ||||||
Amortization of intangible assets |
15 | 18 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total cost of revenue |
300 | 284 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Gross profit |
1,409 | 1,384 | ||||||
Operating expenses: |
||||||||
Sales and marketing |
651 | 668 | ||||||
Research and development |
261 | 249 | ||||||
General and administrative |
119 | 110 | ||||||
Amortization of intangible assets |
71 | 72 | ||||||
Restructuring and transition |
83 | 35 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total operating expenses |
1,185 | 1,134 | ||||||
Operating income |
224 | 250 | ||||||
Interest income |
3 | 3 | ||||||
Interest expense |
(25 | ) | (29 | ) | ||||
Other income (expense), net |
18 | (6 | ) | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Income before income taxes |
220 | 218 | ||||||
Provision for income taxes |
63 | 58 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net income |
157 | 160 | ||||||
Less: Income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interest |
| | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net income attributable to Symantec Corporation stockholders |
$ | 157 | $ | 160 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net income per share attributable to Symantec Corporation stockholders basic |
$ | 0.23 | $ | 0.22 | ||||
Net income per share attributable to Symantec Corporation stockholders diluted |
$ | 0.22 | $ | 0.22 | ||||
Weighted-average shares outstanding attributable to Symantec Corporation stockholders basic |
697 | 716 | ||||||
Weighted-average shares outstanding attributable to Symantec Corporation stockholders diluted |
707 | 720 | ||||||
Cash dividends declared per common share |
$ | 0.15 | $ | |
The accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these financial statements.
4
Table of Contents
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
June 28, 2013 |
June 29, 2012 |
|||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||
(In millions) | ||||||||
Net income |
$ | 157 | $ | 160 | ||||
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of taxes: |
||||||||
Foreign currency translation adjustments: |
||||||||
Translation adjustments |
(18 | ) | 3 | |||||
Available-for-sale securities: |
||||||||
Unrealized gain on available-for-sale securities, net of taxes $2 million and $0 million for the three months ended June 28, 2013 and June 29, 2012, respectively |
4 | 1 | ||||||
Reclassification adjustments for realized gain included in net income, net of taxes of $(5) million and $0 million for the three months ended June 28, 2013 and June 29, 2012, respectively |
(8 | ) | | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net change in unrealized (loss) gain on available-for-sale securities |
(4 | ) | 1 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Other comprehensive (loss) income, net of taxes |
(22 | ) | 4 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Comprehensive income |
135 | 164 | ||||||
Less: Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interest |
| 2 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Comprehensive income attributable to Symantec Corporation stockholders |
$ | 135 | $ | 162 | ||||
|
|
|
|
The accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these financial statements.
5
Table of Contents
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
June 28, | June 29, | |||||||
2013 | 2012 | |||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||
(In millions) | ||||||||
OPERATING ACTIVITIES: |
||||||||
Net income |
$ | 157 | $ | 160 | ||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: |
||||||||
Depreciation |
70 | 70 | ||||||
Amortization of intangible assets |
86 | 90 | ||||||
Amortization of debt issuance costs and discounts |
5 | 15 | ||||||
Stock-based compensation expense |
39 | 38 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes |
31 | (4 | ) | |||||
Excess income tax benefit from the exercise of stock options |
(9 | ) | | |||||
Net gain from sale of short-term investments |
(16 | ) | | |||||
Other |
10 | 6 | ||||||
Net change in assets and liabilities, excluding effects of acquisitions: |
||||||||
Trade accounts receivable, net |
285 | 307 | ||||||
Inventories, net |
6 | 1 | ||||||
Deferred commissions |
(5 | ) | 19 | |||||
Accounts payable |
(64 | ) | | |||||
Accrued compensation and benefits |
(97 | ) | (125 | ) | ||||
Deferred revenue |
(199 | ) | (187 | ) | ||||
Income taxes payable |
(9 | ) | 20 | |||||
Other assets |
1 | (27 | ) | |||||
Other liabilities |
21 | (43 | ) | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
312 | 340 | ||||||
INVESTING ACTIVITIES: |
||||||||
Purchases of property and equipment |
(61 | ) | (79 | ) | ||||
Cash payments for acquisitions, net of cash acquired |
| (28 | ) | |||||
Proceeds from sale of short-term investments |
32 | 22 | ||||||
Other |
| 2 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net cash used in investing activities |
(29 | ) | (83 | ) | ||||
FINANCING ACTIVITIES: |
||||||||
Repayments of debt and other obligations |
(1,189 | ) | | |||||
Proceeds from convertible note hedge |
189 | | ||||||
Net proceeds from sales of common stock under employee stock benefit plans |
54 | 4 | ||||||
Excess income tax benefit from the exercise of stock options |
9 | | ||||||
Tax payments related to restricted stock units |
(25 | ) | (7 | ) | ||||
Dividends paid, net |
(105 | ) | | |||||
Repurchases of common stock |
(125 | ) | (301 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from debt issuance, net of discount |
| 996 | ||||||
Debt issuance costs |
| (7 | ) | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities |
(1,192 | ) | 685 | |||||
Effect of exchange rate fluctuations on cash and cash equivalents |
(27 | ) | (22 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Change in cash and cash equivalents |
(936 | ) | 920 | |||||
Beginning cash and cash equivalents |
4,685 | 3,162 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Ending cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 3,749 | $ | 4,082 | ||||
|
|
|
|
The accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these financial statements.
6
Table of Contents
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Note 1. Basis of Presentation
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements of Symantec Corporation (Symantec, we, us, our, and the Company refer to Symantec Corporation and all of its subsidiaries) as of June 28, 2013 and March 29, 2013, and for the three months ended June 28, 2013 and June 29, 2012, have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America for interim financial information and with the instructions on Form 10-Q pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). In accordance with those rules and regulations, we have omitted certain information and notes normally provided in our annual consolidated financial statements. In the opinion of management, the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements contain all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring items, except as otherwise noted, necessary for the fair presentation of our financial position, results of operations, and cash flows for the interim periods. These unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes thereto included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 29, 2013. The results of operations for the three months ended June 28, 2013 are not necessarily indicative of the results expected for the entire fiscal year.
Segment reporting change
We modified our segment reporting structure to match our new operating structure and how our Chief Operating Decision Maker (CODM) views the business and allocates resources, beginning from the first quarter of fiscal 2014. The CODM function is comprised of our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Operating Officer, Chief Financial Officer, and President, Products & Services. Reclassifications of prior period financial information have been made to conform to the current period presentation. This change does not impact previously reported condensed consolidated financial statements of the Company. See Note 9 for additional information on our segment reporting change.
Significant Accounting Policies
Contingencies
We evaluate contingent liabilities including threatened or pending litigation and government investigations in accordance with the authoritative guidance on contingencies. We assess the likelihood of any adverse judgments or outcomes from potential claims or proceedings, as well as potential ranges of probable losses, when the outcomes of the claims or proceedings are probable and reasonably estimable. A determination of the amount of accrued liabilities required, if any, for these contingencies is made after the analysis of each separate matter. Because of uncertainties related to these matters, we base our estimates on the information available at the time of our assessment. As additional information becomes available, we reassess the potential liability related to our pending claims, litigation and government investigations, and may revise our estimates. Any revisions in the estimates of potential liabilities could have a material impact on our operating results and financial position.
Change in Accounting Policy for Sales Commissions
Effective March 30, 2013, we changed our accounting policy for sales commissions that are incremental and directly related to customer sales contracts in which revenue is deferred. These commission costs are accrued and capitalized upon execution of a non-cancelable customer contract, and subsequently expensed over the term of such contract in proportion to the related future revenue streams. For commission costs where revenue is recognized, the related commission costs are recorded in the period of revenue recognition. Prior to this change in accounting policy, commission costs were expensed in the period in which they were incurred. The adoption of this accounting policy change has been applied retrospectively to all periods presented in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, in which the cumulative effect of the change has been reflected as of the beginning of the first period presented. Deferred
7
Table of Contents
commissions as of June 28, 2013 and March 29, 2013 were $164 million and $159 million, respectively. During the three months ended June 28, 2013, we capitalized $54 million of commission costs and amortized $49 million to sales expense. During the three months ended June 29, 2012, we deferred $31 million of commission costs and amortized $53 million to sales expense.
We believe this change in accounting policy is preferable as the direct and incremental commission costs are closely related to the revenue, and therefore they should be recorded as an asset and recognized as an expense over the same period that the related revenue is recognized.
The cumulative effect of the change on accumulated deficit and accumulated other comprehensive income was $109 million and $3 million, respectively, as of March 31, 2012. The following tables present the changes to financial statement line items as a result of the accounting change for the periods presented in the accompanying unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements:
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet
As of March 29, 2013 | ||||||||||||
As Reported | Adjustment | As Adjusted | ||||||||||
(In millions) | ||||||||||||
Deferred income taxes |
$ | 198 | $ | (29 | ) | $ | 169 | |||||
Deferred commissions |
$ | | $ | 130 | $ | 130 | ||||||
Long-term deferred commissions |
$ | | $ | 29 | $ | 29 | ||||||
Other long-term assets |
$ | 124 | $ | (1 | ) | $ | 123 | |||||
Other current liabilities |
$ | 313 | $ | 5 | $ | 318 | ||||||
Long-term deferred tax liabilities |
$ | 403 | $ | 23 | $ | 426 | ||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
$ | 197 | $ | 2 | $ | 199 | ||||||
Accumulated deficit |
$ | (2,096 | ) | $ | 99 | $ | (1,997 | ) |
Condensed Consolidated Statement of Income
Three Months Ended | ||||||||||||
June 29, 2012 | ||||||||||||
As Reported | Adjustment | As Adjusted | ||||||||||
(In millions, except per share data) | ||||||||||||
Operating expenses: Sales and marketing |
$ | 649 | $ | 19 | $ | 668 | ||||||
Provision for income taxes |
$ | 65 | $ | (7 | ) | $ | 58 | |||||
Net income attributable to Symantec Corporation stockholders |
$ | 172 | $ | (12 | ) | $ | 160 | |||||
Net income per share attributable to Symantec Corporation stockholders basic |
$ | 0.24 | $ | (0.02 | ) | $ | 0.22 | |||||
Net income per share attributable to Symantec Corporation stockholders diluted |
$ | 0.24 | $ | (0.02 | ) | $ | 0.22 | |||||
Weighted-average shares outstanding attributable to Symantec Corporation stockholders basic |
716 | | 716 | |||||||||
Weighted-average shares outstanding attributable to Symantec Corporation stockholders diluted |
720 | | 720 |
8
Table of Contents
Condensed Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income
Three Months Ended | ||||||||||||
June 29, 2012 | ||||||||||||
As Reported | Adjustment | As Adjusted | ||||||||||
(In millions) | ||||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 172 | $ | (12 | ) | $ | 160 | |||||
Net foreign currency translation adjustments |
$ | 6 | $ | (3 | ) | $ | 3 | |||||
Comprehensive income |
$ | 179 | $ | (15 | ) | $ | 164 |
The change in accounting policy does not affect our balance of Cash and cash equivalents and as a result did not change net cash flows from operating, investing, or financing activities in our Condensed Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for the three months ended June 29, 2012.
There have been no material changes in our significant accounting policies for the three months ended June 28, 2013, as compared to the significant accounting policies described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 29, 2013, other than as discussed above.
Note 2. Fair Value Measurements
For assets and liabilities measured at fair value, such amounts are based on an expected exit price representing the amount that would be received on the sale of an asset or paid to transfer a liability, as the case may be, in an orderly transaction between market participants. As such, fair value may be based on assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability. The authoritative guidance on fair value measurements establishes a consistent framework for measuring fair value on either a recurring or nonrecurring basis whereby inputs, used in valuation techniques, are assigned a hierarchical level. The following are the hierarchical levels of inputs to measure fair value:
| Level 1: Observable inputs that reflect quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets. |
| Level 2: Observable inputs that reflect quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in markets that are not active; quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets; inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the assets or liabilities; or inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data by correlation or other means. |
| Level 3: Unobservable inputs reflecting our own assumptions incorporated in valuation techniques used to determine fair value. These assumptions are required to be consistent with market participant assumptions that are reasonably available. |
9
Table of Contents
Assets measured and recorded at fair value on a recurring basis
There have been no transfers between fair value measurement levels during the three months ended June 28, 2013. The following table summarizes our assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis, by level, within the fair value hierarchy:
As of June 28, 2013 | As of March 29, 2013 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Level 1 | Level 2 | Total | Level 1 | Level 2 | Total | |||||||||||||||||||
(In millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash equivalents (1) |
$ | 2,469 | $ | | $ | 2,469 | $ | 3,469 | $ | | $ | 3,469 | ||||||||||||
Marketable equity securities |
34 | | 34 | 62 | | 62 |
(1) | Cash equivalents consist of investments with remaining maturities of three months or less at the date of purchase, or money market funds for which the carrying amount is a reasonable estimate of fair value. |
Note 3. Goodwill and Intangible Assets
Goodwill
The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill were as follows:
User Productivity & Protection |
Information Security |
Information Management |
Total | |||||||||||||
(In millions) | ||||||||||||||||
Net balance as of March 29, 2013 |
$ | 1,649 | $ | 1,486 | $ | 2,706 | $ | 5,841 | ||||||||
Adjustments (1) |
(1 | ) | 1 | | | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Net balance as of June 28, 2013 |
$ | 1,648 | $ | 1,487 | $ | 2,706 | $ | 5,841 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) | Adjustments made to goodwill reflect foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations. |
Effective in the first quarter of fiscal 2014, we evaluated our segment reporting structure and modified the reporting to match our new operating structure. Our reporting units for goodwill are the same as our reportable operating segments, and the net goodwill balance has been allocated to the reporting units based on their relative fair value. See Note 9 for information regarding the changes related to segment information.
As a result of the change in our segments, we assessed goodwill for impairment immediately prior to the changes to the new reporting units and determined that the estimated fair value of our reporting units exceeded their respective carrying amount including goodwill. Based on the results of our impairment analysis, we do not believe that an impairment existed as of the date of the change in our segments.
10
Table of Contents
Intangible assets, net
As of June 28, 2013 | As of March 29, 2013 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gross Carrying Amount |
Accumulated Amortization |
Net Carrying Amount |
Weighted- Average Remaining Useful Life |
Gross Carrying Amount |
Accumulated Amortization |
Net Carrying Amount |
Weighted- Average Remaining Useful Life | |||||||||||||||||||||
($ in millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Customer relationships |
$ | 2,203 | $ | (1,833 | ) | $ | 370 | 4 years | $ | 2,205 | $ | (1,766 | ) | $ | 439 | 2 years | ||||||||||||
Developed technology |
1,917 | (1,734 | ) | 183 | 4 years | 1,917 | (1,720 | ) | 197 | 4 years | ||||||||||||||||||
Finite-lived tradenames |
146 | (113 | ) | 33 | 2 years | 146 | (110 | ) | 36 | 2 years | ||||||||||||||||||
Patents |
26 | (19 | ) | 7 | 4 years | 26 | (18 | ) | 8 | 5 years | ||||||||||||||||||
Indefinite-lived tradenames |
297 | | 297 | Indefinite | 297 | | 297 | Indefinite | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 4,589 | $ | (3,699 | ) | $ | 890 | 4 years | $ | 4,591 | $ | (3,614 | ) | $ | 977 | 2 years | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total future amortization expense for intangible assets that have finite lives as of June 28, 2013, is estimated by fiscal years as follows (in millions):
Remainder of fiscal 2014 |
$ | 124 | ||
2015 |
157 | |||
2016 |
106 | |||
2017 |
86 | |||
2018 |
65 | |||
Thereafter |
55 | |||
|
|
|||
Total |
$ | 593 | ||
|
|
Note 4. Supplemental Financial Information
Property and equipment, net
As of | ||||||||
June 28, | March 29, | |||||||
2013 | 2013 | |||||||
(In millions) | ||||||||
Computer hardware and software |
$ | 1,786 | $ | 1,820 | ||||
Office furniture and equipment |
141 | 172 | ||||||
Buildings |
532 | 530 | ||||||
Leasehold improvements |
323 | 310 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
2,782 | 2,832 | |||||||
Less: Accumulated depreciation |
(1,820 | ) | (1,853 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
962 | 979 | |||||||
Construction in progress |
61 | 64 | ||||||
Land |
79 | 79 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total |
$ | 1,102 | $ | 1,122 | ||||
|
|
|
|
Dividends and dividend equivalents
During the three months ended June 28, 2013, we paid a cash dividend of $0.15 per share of common stock for a total of $105 million, which was recorded as a reduction to Additional paid-in capital. In addition, our board of directors approved dividend equivalent rights entitling holders of restricted stock and performance-based stock to dividend equivalents to be paid in the form of cash upon vesting, for each share of the underlying units. No dividends and dividend equivalents were paid in any periods prior to fiscal 2014. Any future dividends and dividend equivalents will be subject to the approval of our board of directors.
11
Table of Contents
Changes in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income by Component
Foreign Currency Translation Adjustments |
Unrealized Gain On Available-For-Sale Securities |
Total | ||||||||||
(In millions) | ||||||||||||
Balance as of March 29, 2013, net of taxes |
$ | 183 | $ | 16 | $ | 199 | ||||||
Other comprehensive income before reclassifications |
(27 | ) | 6 | (21 | ) | |||||||
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income |
| (13 | ) | (13 | ) | |||||||
Tax effects |
9 | 3 | 12 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Net changes |
(18 | ) | (4 | ) | (22 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Balance as of June 28, 2013, net of taxes |
$ | 165 | $ | 12 | $ | 177 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
The effects on net income of amounts reclassified from Accumulated other comprehensive income for the three months ended June 28, 2013 were as follows (in millions):
Details about Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income |
Amount Reclassified from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income |
Affected Line Item in the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Income | ||||
Unrealized gain on available-for-sale securities |
$ | 13 | Other income (expense), net | |||
Tax effects |
(5 | ) | Provision for income taxes | |||
|
|
|||||
Total amount reclassified, net of taxes |
$ | 8 | ||||
|
|
Note 5. Debt
In the first quarter of fiscal 2007, we issued $1.0 billion in principal amount of 1.00% Convertible Senior Notes (1.00% notes), due in June 2013. On June 15, 2013, the principal balance on those notes matured and was settled by a cash payment of $1.0 billion, along with the $5 million semi-annual interest payment. In addition, we elected to pay the conversion value above par value in cash in the amount of $189 million. Concurrently with the payment of the conversion value, we received $189 million from our note hedge, which we had entered into at the time of the issuance of the 1.00% notes.
At the time of issuance of the 1.00% notes, we granted warrants to affiliates of certain initial purchasers of the notes whereby they have the option to purchase up to 52 million shares of our common stock at a price of $27.3175 per share. As a result of the dividend declaration by our board of directors in May 2013, the strike price for the warrants was reduced to $27.1330 per share, with the number of underlying shares increased to 52.7 million of our common stock. The warrants expire on various dates through August 30, 2013 and must be settled in net shares on any date which the price per share equals or exceeds $27.1330.
Effect of warrant conversion on earnings per share (EPS). If the daily volume weighted average trading price of our common stock exceeds $27.1330 per share, a dilutive effect related to the warrants exists under the treasury stock method. The dilutive effect would total approximately 1.9 million shares assuming that the Companys daily volume weighted average price is $1.00 above the $27.1330 per share price from July 8, 2013 up to the warrant expiration date ending August 30, 2013.
12
Table of Contents
Note 6. Restructuring and Transition
Our restructuring and transition costs and liabilities consist primarily of severance, facilities costs, and transition and other related costs. Severance generally includes severance payments, outplacement services, health insurance coverage, and legal costs. Facilities costs generally include rent expense and lease termination costs, less estimated sublease income. Transition and other related costs primarily consist of severance costs associated with acquisition integrations in efforts to streamline our business operations, and costs associated with the planning and design phases of a new enterprise resource planning system. Restructuring and transition costs are managed at the corporate level and are not allocated to our reportable segments. See Note 9 for information regarding the reconciliation of total segment operating income to total consolidated operating income.
Restructuring plan
In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2013, we announced our strategy to develop innovative products and services, change our go-to-market plans and simplify our organizational structure. We initiated a restructuring plan in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2013 to reduce management and redundant personnel resulting in headcount reductions across the Company. These actions are expected to be completed in fiscal 2014. As of June 28, 2013, total cost incurred to date is $74 million, primarily related to severance and related employee benefits. Including costs previously incurred in fiscal 2013, we expect our total costs for severance and benefits to be between $220 million and $250 million.
Other exit and disposal costs
Our other exit and disposal costs consist primarily of costs associated with closing or consolidating certain facilities. Largely as a result of business acquisitions, management may deem certain leased facilities to be in excess and plan to exit them either at the time of acquisition or after the acquisition in conjunction with our efforts to integrate and streamline our operations. As of June 28, 2013, liabilities for these excess facility obligations at several locations around the world are expected to be paid over the respective lease terms, the longest of which extends through fiscal 2018.
Restructuring and transition summary
March 29, 2013 | Costs, Net
of Adjustments (1) |
Cash Payments | June 28, 2013 | Cumulative Incurred to Date |
||||||||||||||||
(In millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Restructuring liabilities: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Restructuring plan severance |
$ | 10 | $ | 64 | $ | (18 | ) | $ | 56 | $ | 74 | |||||||||
Other exit and disposal costs |
3 | 1 | (1 | ) | 3 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total restructuring liabilities |
$ | 13 | $ | 65 | $ | (19 | ) | $ | 59 | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Transition and other related costs |
18 | |||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Total restructuring and transition |
$ | 83 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Balance Sheet: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Other current liabilities |
$ | 11 | $ | 57 | ||||||||||||||||
Other long-term obligations |
2 | 2 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Total restructuring liabilities |
$ | 13 | $ | 59 | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
(1) | Adjustments primarily relate to foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations. Included in transition and other related costs is $18 million in costs associated with the planning and design phases of a new enterprise resource planning system. |
13
Table of Contents
Note 7. Commitments and Contingencies
Indemnification
In the ordinary course of business, we may provide indemnifications of varying scope and terms to customers, vendors, lessors, business partners, subsidiaries and other parties with respect to certain matters, including, but not limited to, losses arising out of our breach of agreements or representations and warranties made by us. In addition, our bylaws contain indemnification obligations to our directors, officers, employees and agents, and we have entered into indemnification agreements with our directors and certain of our officers to give such directors and officers additional contractual assurances regarding the scope of the indemnification set forth in our bylaws and to provide additional procedural protections. We maintain director and officer insurance, which may cover certain liabilities arising from our obligation to indemnify our directors and officers. It is not possible to determine the aggregate maximum potential loss under these indemnification agreements due to the limited history of prior indemnification claims and the unique facts and circumstances involved in each particular agreement. Such indemnification agreements might not be subject to maximum loss clauses. Historically, we have not incurred material costs as a result of obligations under these agreements and we have not accrued any liabilities related to such indemnification obligations in our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
We provide limited product warranties and the majority of our software license agreements contain provisions that indemnify licensees of our software from damages and costs resulting from claims alleging that our software infringes on the intellectual property rights of a third party. Historically, payments made under these provisions have been immaterial. We monitor the conditions that are subject to indemnification to identify if a loss has occurred.
Litigation contingencies
During the first quarter of fiscal 2013, we were advised by the Commercial Litigation Branch of the Department of Justices Civil Division and the Civil Division of the U.S. Attorneys Office for the District of Columbia that the government is investigating our compliance with certain provisions of our U.S. General Services Administration (GSA) Multiple Award Schedule Contract No. GS-35F-0240T effective January 24, 2007, including provisions relating to pricing, country of origin, accessibility, and the disclosure of commercial sales practices. We are cooperating with the investigation and we are unable, at this time, to predict the likely outcome. It is possible that the investigation could lead to claims or findings of violations of the False Claims Act in connection with our GSA contracting activity. However, given the status of the investigation, we are currently unable to estimate whether any loss has been incurred. Violations of the False Claims Act could result in the imposition of damages, including up to treble damages, plus civil penalties in some cases.
We are also involved in a number of other judicial and administrative proceedings that are incidental to our business. Although adverse decisions (or settlements) may occur in one or more of the cases, it is not possible to estimate the possible loss or losses from each of these cases. The final resolution of these lawsuits, individually or in the aggregate, is not expected to have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition or cash flow.
Note 8. Stock Repurchases
The following table summarizes our stock repurchases:
Three Months Ended | ||
June 28, 2013 | ||
(In millions, except per share data) | ||
Total number of shares repurchased |
5 | |
Dollar amount of shares repurchased |
$125 | |
Average price paid per share |
$23.96 | |
Range of price paid per share |
$21.95 - $25.28 |
14
Table of Contents
We have had stock repurchase programs in the past and have repurchased shares on a quarterly basis since the fourth quarter of fiscal 2004. In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2013, our board of directors authorized a new $1.0 billion stock repurchase program commencing in fiscal 2014. Including our previously approved stock repurchase program, approximately $1.0 billion remains authorized for future repurchases as of June 28, 2013, and neither program has an expiration date.
Note 9. Segment Information
In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2013, we announced a new strategy and created three new business segments to provide customers with integrated solutions that solve important problems, as well as made changes to our organizational structure. In the first quarter of fiscal 2014, we modified our segment reporting structure to more readily match the new operating structure based on information reviewed by our CODM. The three reporting segments, which are the same as our operating segments, are as follows:
| User Productivity & Protection: Our User Productivity & Protection segment focuses on making it simple for customers to be productive and protected at home and at work. These products include our endpoint security and management, encryption, and mobile offerings. |
| Information Security: Our Information Security segment focuses on keeping businesses safe and compliant, regardless of the size, location, or complexity of their infrastructure. These products include our next generation security capabilities, such as mail and web security, authentication services, data center security, managed security services, hosted security services, and data loss prevention. |
| Information Management: Our Information Management segment is comprised of offerings related to backup and recovery, information intelligence, which includes archiving and e-discovery, and information availability, which we previously referred to as storage management. |
There were no intersegment sales for the three months ended June 28, 2013 or June 29, 2012. The historical information presented has been retrospectively adjusted to reflect the new segment reporting. The following table summarizes the operating results of our reporting segments:
User Productivity & Protection |
Information Security |
Information Management |
Total Segments | |||||||||||||
($ in millions) | ||||||||||||||||
Three Months Ended June 28, 2013 |
||||||||||||||||
Net revenue |
$ | 732 | $ | 336 | $ | 641 | $ | 1,709 | ||||||||
Percentage of total net revenue |
43 | % | 20 | % | 37 | % | 100 | % | ||||||||
Operating income |
257 | 26 | 149 | 432 | ||||||||||||
Operating margin |
35 | % | 8 | % | 23 | % | ||||||||||
Three Months Ended June 29, 2012 |
||||||||||||||||
Net revenue |
$ | 737 | $ | 314 | $ | 617 | $ | 1,668 | ||||||||
Percentage of total net revenue |
44 | % | 19 | % | 37 | % | 100 | % | ||||||||
Operating income (loss) |
258 | (8 | ) | 166 | 416 | |||||||||||
Operating margin |
35 | % | (3 | )% | 27 | % |
Operating segments are based upon the nature of the business and how the business is managed. Our CODM uses financial information to evaluate the performance of, and to assign resources to, each of the operating segments. We do not allocate to the operating segments certain operating expenses, which we manage separately at the corporate level. These unallocated costs primarily include amortization of intangible assets, restructuring and transition charges, stock-based compensation expense, impairment charges, and acquisition-related charges.
15
Table of Contents
The reconciliation of Total segment operating income to Total consolidated operating income is as follows:
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
June 28, | June 29, | |||||||
2013 | 2012 | |||||||
(In millions) | ||||||||
Total segment operating income |
$ | 432 | $ | 416 | ||||
Reconciling items: |
||||||||
Amortization of intangibles |
86 | 90 | ||||||
Restructuring & transition |
83 | 35 | ||||||
Stock-based compensation |
39 | 38 | ||||||
Acquisition-related expenses |
| 3 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total consolidated operating income |
$ | 224 | $ | 250 | ||||
|
|
|
|
Note 10. Stock-based Compensation
The following table sets forth the total stock-based compensation expense recognized in our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income:
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
June 28, | June 29, | |||||||
2013 | 2012 | |||||||
(In millions, except per share data) | ||||||||
Cost of revenue |
$ | 4 | $ | 4 | ||||
Sales and marketing |
14 | 16 | ||||||
Research and development |
13 | 11 | ||||||
General and administrative |
8 | 7 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total stock-based compensation expense |
39 | 38 | ||||||
Tax benefit associated with stock-based compensation expense |
(11 | ) | (10 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net stock-based compensation expense |
$ | 28 | $ | 28 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net stock-based compensation expense per share attributable to Symantec Corporation stockholders basic |
$ | 0.04 | $ | 0.04 | ||||
Net stock-based compensation expense per share attributable to Symantec Corporation stockholders diluted |
$ | 0.04 | $ | 0.04 |
16
Table of Contents
The following table summarizes additional information pertaining to our stock-based compensation:
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
June 28, | June 29, | |||||||
2013 | 2012 | |||||||
($ in millions, except per grant data) | ||||||||
Restricted stock |
||||||||
Weighted-average fair value per grant |
$ | 23.86 | $ | 14.95 | ||||
Fair value of awards granted |
45 | 134 | ||||||
Total fair value of awards vested |
74 | 26 | ||||||
Total unrecognized compensation expense |
224 | 292 | ||||||
Weighted-average remaining vesting period |
3 years | 3 years | ||||||
Performance-based restricted stock |
||||||||
Weighted-average fair value per grant |
$ | 19.04 | $ | 16.60 | ||||
Fair value of awards granted |
33 | 21 | ||||||
Total fair value of awards vested |
11 | | ||||||
Total unrecognized compensation expense |
40 | 28 | ||||||
Weighted-average remaining vesting period |
2 years | 2 years | ||||||
Stock options |
||||||||
Weighted-average fair value per grant |
$ | | $ | 4.07 | ||||
Total intrinsic value of stock options exercised |
21 | 2 | ||||||
Total unrecognized compensation expense |
11 | 26 | ||||||
Weighted-average remaining vesting period |
2 years | 2 years |
During the first quarter of fiscal 2014, we granted 67,550 Restricted Stock Awards to members of our board of directors. Each award had a fair value of $24.35 and vested immediately upon grant. As a result, we recorded $2 million of stock-based compensation expense for these awards during the first quarter of fiscal 2014.
Note 11. Income Taxes
The effective tax rate was approximately 29% and 27% for the three months ended June 28, 2013 and June 29, 2012, respectively.
For the three months ended June 28, 2013, the tax expense was reduced by $3 million in tax benefits primarily resulting from tax settlements, lapses of statutes of limitations, and prior year items. These tax benefits were offset by $6 million in tax expense resulting from the sale of short-term investments. For the three months ended June 29, 2012, the tax expense was reduced by $4 million in tax benefits primarily resulting from lapses of statutes of limitations and prior year items.
The provision for the three months ended June 28, 2013 and June 29, 2012 otherwise reflects a forecasted tax rate of 29% and 29%, respectively. The forecasted tax rates for both periods presented reflect the benefits of lower-taxed international earnings, domestic manufacturing incentives, and research and development credits (the U.S. federal R&D tax credit is currently set to expire on December 31, 2013), partially offset by state income taxes.
We are a U.S.-based multinational company subject to tax in multiple U.S. and international tax jurisdictions. A substantial portion of our international earnings were generated from subsidiaries organized in Ireland and Singapore. Our results of operations would be adversely affected to the extent that our geographical mix of income becomes more weighted toward jurisdictions with higher tax rates and would be favorably affected to the extent the relative geographic mix shifts to lower tax jurisdictions. Any change in our mix of earnings is dependent upon many factors and is therefore difficult to predict.
17
Table of Contents
The timing of the resolution of income tax examinations is highly uncertain, and the amounts ultimately paid, if any, upon resolution of the issues raised by the taxing authorities may differ materially from the amounts accrued for each year. Although potential resolution of uncertain tax positions involve multiple tax periods and jurisdictions, it is reasonably possible that the gross unrecognized tax benefits related to these audits could decrease (whether by payment, release, or a combination of both) in the next 12 months by between $15 million and $130 million. Depending on the nature of the settlement or expiration of statutes of limitations, we estimate at least $15 million could affect our income tax provision and therefore benefit the resulting effective tax rate. As of June 28, 2013, we have $76 million on deposit with the IRS pertaining to U.S. tax matters in the Symantec 2005 through 2008 audit cycle.
We continue to monitor the progress of ongoing tax controversies and the impact, if any, of the expected expiration of the statute of limitations in various taxing jurisdictions.
Note 12. Earnings Per Share
The components of earnings per share attributable to Symantec Corporation stockholders are as follows:
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
June 28, | June 29, | |||||||
2013 | 2012 | |||||||
(In millions, except per share data) | ||||||||
Net income |
$ | 157 | $ | 160 | ||||
Net income per share basic |
$ | 0.23 | $ | 0.22 | ||||
Net income per share diluted |
$ | 0.22 | $ | 0.22 | ||||
Weighted-average outstanding common shares basic |
697 | 716 | ||||||
Dilutive potential shares issuable from assumed exercise of stock options |
3 | 1 | ||||||
Dilutive potential shares related to stock award plans |
7 | 3 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Weighted-average shares outstanding diluted |
707 | 720 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Anti-dilutive weighted-average stock options |
4 | 32 | ||||||
Anti-dilutive weighted-average restricted stock |
1 | 6 |
See Note 5 for information regarding the effects of the 1.00% notes, and the warrants issued and the option purchased in connection with the 1.00% notes.
Note 13. Subsequent Event
On July 30, 2013, our board of directors approved a quarterly dividend in the amount of $0.15 per share of common stock to be paid on September 18, 2013 to stockholders of record as of August 26, 2013. All shares of common stock issued and outstanding, and unvested restricted stock and performance-based stock as of August 26th will be entitled to the dividend and dividend equivalents, respectively. Any future dividends and dividend equivalents will be subject to the approval of our board of directors.
18
Table of Contents
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Forward-looking statements and factors that may affect future results
The discussion below contains forward-looking statements, which are subject to safe harbors under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the Securities Act), or the Securities Act, and the Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act). Forward-looking statements include references to our ability to utilize our deferred tax assets, as well as statements including words such as expects, plans, anticipates, believes, estimates, predicts, projects, and similar expressions. In addition, statements that refer to projections of our future financial performance, anticipated growth and trends in our businesses and in our industries, the anticipated impacts of acquisitions, our intent to pay quarterly cash dividends in the future, the actions we intend to take as part of our new strategy, the expected impact of our new strategy and other characterizations of future events or circumstances are forward-looking statements. These statements are only predictions, based on our current expectations about future events and may not prove to be accurate. We do not undertake any obligation to update these forward-looking statements to reflect events occurring or circumstances arising after the date of this report. These forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties, and our actual results, performance, or achievements could differ materially from those expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements on the basis of several factors, including those that we discuss in Risk Factors, set forth in Part I, Item 1A, of our annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 29, 2013. We encourage you to read that section carefully.
Fiscal calendar
We have a 52/53-week fiscal accounting year ending on the Friday closest to March 31. The three months ended June 28, 2013 and June 29, 2012 both consisted of 13 weeks.
OVERVIEW
Our business
Symantec is a global leader in security, backup and availability solutions. Our innovative products and services protect people and information in any digital environment from the smallest mobile device, to the enterprise data center, to cloud-based systems. Our software and services protect against advanced threats independent of the device and environment in which information is used or stored.
Strategy
Our strategy is to develop innovative products and services, change our go-to-market plans and simplify our organizational structure. Our goal is to establish leadership in this evolving information-centric world by identifying and delivering solutions that solve large unmet or underserved customer needs, while building competitive advantage and creating sustainable financial performance. To successfully implement our strategy we are focusing on three areas: developing innovative products and services, changing our go-to-market plans, and simplifying our organization.
Financial Implications of New Strategy
Fiscal 2014 will include significant changes to our offerings, go-to-market plans and our organizational structure as we strive to create sustainable growth. We believe that sales of our innovative and differentiated products are enhanced by knowledgeable salespeople who can convey the strong value of our technology; as such, we are reorganizing our direct sales force into functional areas of security and information management. The focus of these specialized teams will be to generate new business. We expect that by dividing our direct sales force into specialized teams, we will improve the efficiency and effectiveness of our sales process.
Concurrently, we are creating a dedicated renewals team that will be focused on extending the customer relationship and renewing contracts. We are also streamlining our indirect sales channels to effectively reach
19
Table of Contents
customers. We intend to have fewer, more focused partners. Additionally, we intend to reorient our partner programs to enhance reseller sales. We believe these changes will ensure that we provide our end customer with a high-quality sales and post-sales support experiences while expanding our business. Our income and cash flows are expected to be impacted by severance and other charges, as well as capital expenditures as we invest in our people, processes, infrastructure, and offerings to execute our organic growth strategy.
As part of our enhanced capital allocation strategy, we initiated a quarterly cash dividend in addition to our ongoing share repurchase activity. On May 2, 2013, our board of directors approved a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share of common stock, the first dividend in Symantecs history, which was paid on June 27, 2013 to all stockholders of record as of June 19, 2013.
Our operating segments
Our operating segments are significant strategic business units that offer different products and services, distinguished by customer needs. In the first quarter of fiscal 2014, we modified our segment reporting structure to match our new operating structure. The three reporting segments, which are the same as our operating segments, are as follows:
| User Productivity & Protection: Our User Productivity & Protection segment focuses on making it simple for customers to be productive and protected at home and at work. These products include our endpoint security and management, encryption, and mobile offerings. |
| Information Security: Our Information Security segment focuses on keeping businesses safe and compliant, regardless of the size, location, or complexity of their infrastructure. These products include our next generation security capabilities, such as mail and web security, authentication services, data center security, managed security services, hosted security services, and data loss prevention. |
| Information Management: Our Information Management segment is comprised of offerings related to backup and recovery, information intelligence, which includes archiving and e-discovery, and information availability, which we previously referred to as storage management. |
Financial results and trends
Our revenue increased by $41 million for the three months ended June 28, 2013, as compared to the same period last year, primarily driven by growth in our Information Management and Information Security segments. Our revenue grew both domestically and internationally in the three months ended June 28, 2013 as compared to the same period last year, with the highest growth in revenue, on a percentage basis, in the EMEA region followed by the Americas. The Asia Pacific and Japan region declined in this period primarily due to the unfavorable foreign currency impact of the Japanese Yen. Fluctuations in the U.S. dollar compared to foreign currencies unfavorably impacted our international revenue by $13 million for the three months ended June 28, 2013 as compared to the same period last year.
Cost of revenue increased by $16 million for the three months ended June 28, 2013 as compared to the same period last year, primarily due to the growth in our appliances business, Consulting offerings and Business Critical Services.
Operating expenses remained consistent as a percentage of revenue, while we continued to focus on investing in product development and incurred restructuring and transition costs coupled with effectively managing our cost structure. We experienced favorable foreign currency effects on our operating expenses of $13 million in the three months ended June 28, 2013 as compared to the same period last year. We expect research and development expenses to increase through fiscal 2017 as we invest to drive organic innovation for our customers. Furthermore, we will continue to incur significant charges related to the previously initiated restructuring plan as we reduce management and redundant personnel. Including costs previously incurred in fiscal 2013, we expect our total costs for severance and benefits under this restructuring plan to be between $220 million and $250 million. We expect to complete this restructuring plan by the end of fiscal 2014.
20
Table of Contents
Critical accounting estimates
Deferred commissions
Effective March 30, 2013, we changed our accounting policy for sales commissions that are incremental and directly related to customer sales contracts in which revenue is deferred. These commission costs are accrued and capitalized upon execution of a non-cancelable customer contract, and subsequently expensed over the term of such contract in proportion to the related future revenue streams. For commission costs where revenue is recognized, the related commission costs are recorded in the period of revenue recognition. Prior to this change in accounting policy, commission costs were expensed in the period in which they were incurred. The adoption of this accounting policy change has been applied retrospectively to all periods presented in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, in which the cumulative effect of the change has been reflected as of the beginning of the first period presented.
We believe this change in accounting policy is preferable as the direct and incremental commission costs are closely related to the revenue, and therefore they should be recorded as an asset and recognized as an expense over the same period that the related revenue is recognized.
For further information on deferred commissions, refer to Note 1 of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in this Form 10-Q.
There have been no other material changes in the matters for which we make critical accounting estimates in the preparation of our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements during the three months ended June 28, 2013 as compared to those disclosed in Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 29, 2013.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Total net revenue
Three Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||
June
28, 2013 |
June
29, 2012 |
Change in | ||||||||||||||
$ | % | |||||||||||||||
($ in millions) | ||||||||||||||||
Content, subscription, and maintenance revenue |
$ | 1,520 | $ | 1,475 | $ | 45 | 3 | % | ||||||||
Percentage of total net revenue |
89 | % | 88 | % | ||||||||||||
License revenue |
$ | 189 | $ | 193 | $ | (4 | ) | (2 | )% | |||||||
Percentage of total net revenue |
11 | % | 12 | % | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 1,709 | $ | 1,668 | $ | 41 | 2 | % | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
Content, subscription, and maintenance revenue increased for the three months ended June 28, 2013, as compared to the same period last year, primarily due to increases in revenue from our Information Security segment of $21 million and our Information Management segment of $19 million.
License revenue includes sales from software licenses, appliances, and certain revenue-sharing arrangements. License revenue decreased for the three months ended June 28, 2013, as compared to the same period last year, primarily due to a decrease in revenue from our User Productivity & Protection segment of $9 million, partially offset by an increase in revenue from our Information Management segment of $5 million.
21
Table of Contents
Net revenue and operating income (loss) by segment
User Productivity & Protection segment
Three Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||
June
28, 2013 |
June
29, 2012 |
Change in | ||||||||||||||
$ | % | |||||||||||||||
($ in millions) | ||||||||||||||||
User Productivity & Protection revenue |
$ | 732 | $ | 737 | $ | (5 | ) | (1 | )% | |||||||
Percentage of total net revenue |
43 | % | 44 | % | ||||||||||||
User Productivity & Protection operating income |
$ | 257 | $ | 258 | $ | (1 | ) | 0 | % | |||||||
User Productivity & Protection operating margin |
35 | % | 35 | % |
User Productivity & Protection revenue declined for the three months ended June 28, 2013, as compared to the same period last year. Growth in our endpoint security business offset weakness in our endpoint management business and the adverse effects of foreign currency exchange rates. User Productivity & Protection operating income remained consistent for the three months ended June 28, 2013, as compared to the same period last year.
Information Security segment
Three Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||
June
28, 2013 |
June
29, 2012 |
Change in | ||||||||||||||
$ | % | |||||||||||||||
($ in millions) | ||||||||||||||||
Information Security revenue |
$ | 336 | $ | 314 | $ | 22 | 7 | % | ||||||||
Percentage of total net revenue |
20 | % | 19 | % | ||||||||||||
Information Security operating income (loss) |
$ | 26 | $ | (8 | ) | $ | 34 | * | ||||||||
Information Security operating margin |
8 | % | (3 | )% |
* | Percentage not meaningful |
Information Security revenue increased across much of the portfolio of products primarily due to increases in authentication services, hosted security services, and managed security services of $17 million. Information Security operating income increased primarily due to the higher revenue coupled with lower salaries and wages of $7 million and outside services of $5 million.
Information Management segment
Three Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||
June
28, 2013 |
June
29, 2012 |
Change in | ||||||||||||||
$ | % | |||||||||||||||
($ in millions) | ||||||||||||||||
Information Management revenue |
$ | 641 | $ | 617 | $ | 24 | 4 | % | ||||||||
Percentage of total net revenue |
37 | % | 37 | % | ||||||||||||
Information Management operating income |
$ | 149 | $ | 166 | $ | (17 | ) | (10 | )% | |||||||
Information Management operating margin |
23 | % | 27 | % |
Information Management revenue increased primarily due to the growth of our NetBackup and appliance offerings of $40 million, partially offset by declines in our information availability offerings of $14 million and our Backup Exec offerings of $9 million. Information Management operating income decreased primarily from higher cost of revenue of $20 million, compensation of $5 million, and equipment costs of $5 million, partially offset by the revenue growth. The increased cost of revenue was mainly due to growth in the appliance business resulting in higher material costs coupled with higher technical support and services costs.
22
Table of Contents
Net revenue by geographic region
Three Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||
June
28, 2013 |
June
29, 2012 |
Change in | ||||||||||||||
$ | % | |||||||||||||||
($ in millions) | ||||||||||||||||
Americas (U.S., Canada and Latin America) |
||||||||||||||||
User Productivity & Protection segment |
$ | 426 | $ | 419 | $ | 7 | 2 | % | ||||||||
Information Security segment |
174 | 167 | 7 | 4 | % | |||||||||||
Information Management segment |
333 | 323 | 10 | 3 | % | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Total Americas |
$ | 933 | $ | 909 | $ | 24 | 3 | % | ||||||||
Percentage of total net revenue |
55 | % | 55 | % | ||||||||||||
EMEA (Europe, Middle East, Africa) |
||||||||||||||||
User Productivity & Protection segment |
$ | 188 | $ | 184 | $ | 4 | 2 | % | ||||||||
Information Security segment |
91 | 77 | 14 | 18 | % | |||||||||||
Information Management segment |
191 | 175 | 16 | 9 | % | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Total EMEA |
$ | 470 | $ | 436 | $ | 34 | 8 | % | ||||||||
Percentage of total net revenue |
27 | % | 26 | % | ||||||||||||
Asia Pacific/Japan |
||||||||||||||||
User Productivity & Protection segment |
$ | 118 | $ | 134 | $ | (16 | ) | (12 | )% | |||||||
Information Security segment |
71 | 70 | 1 | 1 | % | |||||||||||
Information Management segment |
117 | 119 | (2 | ) | (2 | )% | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Total Asia Pacific/Japan |
$ | 306 | $ | 323 | $ | (17 | ) | (5 | )% | |||||||
Percentage of total net revenue |
18 | % | 19 | % | ||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 1,709 | $ | 1,668 | $ | 41 | 2 | % |
Fluctuations in the U.S. dollar compared to foreign currencies unfavorably impacted our international revenue by approximately $13 million for the three months ended June 28, 2013 as compared to the same period last year. The Asia Pacific and Japan region declined primarily due to the unfavorable foreign currency impact of the Japanese Yen. Our international sales are and will continue to be a significant portion of our revenue. As a result, revenue will continue to be affected by foreign currency exchange rates as compared to the U.S. dollar. We are unable to predict the extent to which revenue in future periods will be impacted by changes in foreign currency exchange rates. If international sales continue to become a greater portion of our total sales in the future, changes in foreign currency exchange rates may have a potentially greater impact on our revenue and operating results.
Cost of revenue
Three Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||
June
28, 2013 |
June
29, 2012 |
Change in | ||||||||||||||
$ | % | |||||||||||||||
($ in millions) | ||||||||||||||||
Cost of content, subscription, and maintenance |
$ | 263 | $ | 249 | $ | 14 | 6 | % | ||||||||
As a percentage of related revenue |
17 | % | 17 | % | ||||||||||||
Cost of license |
$ | 22 | $ | 17 | $ | 5 | 29 | % | ||||||||
As a percentage of related revenue |
12 | % | 9 | % | ||||||||||||
Amortization of intangible assets |
$ | 15 | $ | 18 | $ | (3 | ) | (17 | )% | |||||||
As a percentage of total net revenue |
1 | % | 1 | % | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 300 | $ | 284 | $ | 16 | 6 | % | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Gross margin |
82 | % | 83 | % |
Cost of content, subscription, and maintenance consists primarily of technical support costs, costs of billable services, and fees to original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) under revenue-sharing agreements. Cost of content,
23
Table of Contents
subscription, and maintenance increased primarily due to higher technical support, services, and OEM royalty costs. The increased costs were due to growth in our business and higher services costs and royalty payments to major OEM partners as part of revenue-sharing arrangements. Cost of content, subscription, and maintenance as a percentage of related revenue remained consistent. Cost of license consists primarily of royalties paid to third parties under technology licensing agreements, appliance manufacturing costs, and other direct material costs. Cost of license and cost of license as a percentage of related revenue increased primarily due to the higher direct costs associated with the appliance business. Intangible assets are comprised of developed technologies and patents from acquired companies. Amortization decreased for the three months ended June 28, 2013, as compared with same period last year, due to certain developed technology becoming fully amortized.
Operating expenses
Three Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||
June
28, 2013 |
June
29, 2012 |
Change in | ||||||||||||||
$ | % | |||||||||||||||
($ in millions) | ||||||||||||||||
Sales and marketing expense |
$ | 651 | $ | 668 | $ | (17 | ) | (3 | )% | |||||||
Percentage of total net revenue |
38 | % | 40 | % | ||||||||||||
Research and development expense |
$ | 261 | $ | 249 | $ | 12 | 5 | % | ||||||||
Percentage of total net revenue |
15 | % | 15 | % | ||||||||||||
General and administrative expense |
$ | 119 | $ | 110 | $ | 9 | 8 | % | ||||||||
Percentage of total net revenue |
7 | % | 7 | % | ||||||||||||
Amortization of intangible assets |
$ | 71 | $ | 72 | $ | (1 | ) | (1 | )% | |||||||
Percentage of total net revenue |
4 | % | 4 | % | ||||||||||||
Restructuring and transition |
$ | 83 | $ | 35 | $ | 48 | * | |||||||||
Percentage of total net revenue |
5 | % | 2 | % | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 1,185 | $ | 1,134 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
* | Percentage not meaningful |
Sales and marketing expense decreased for the three months ended June 28, 2013, as compared to the same period last year, primarily due to lower advertising and promotional expenses of $26 million, which was mainly attributable to lower placement fees, and outside services of $9 million, partially offset by higher salaries and wages of $20 million. Research and development and general and administrative expenses remained consistent as a percentage of revenue when compared to the same period last year. Intangible assets are comprised of customer relationships and trade names. Amortization of intangible assets remained consistent for the periods presented.
Restructuring and transition costs consist of severance, facilities, transition and other related costs. Transition and other related costs consist of severance costs associated with acquisition integrations and other charges associated with the planning and design phases of a new enterprise resource planning system. For the three months ended June 28, 2013, we recognized $64 million of severance, $18 million of transition and other related costs, and $1 million of facilities costs. The severance charges were associated with the previously announced restructuring plan in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2013. This plan is expected to be completed in fiscal 2014 and we expect to incur significant restructuring charges thereunder. For the three months ended June 29, 2012, we recognized transition and other related costs of $35 million, which was comprised of $26 million in severance and $9 million in costs related to the planning and design phases. For further information on restructuring and transition costs, see Note 6 of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in this report.
24
Table of Contents
Non-operating income (expense), net
Three Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||
June
28, 2013 |
June
29, 2012 |
Change in | ||||||||||||||
$ | % | |||||||||||||||
($ in millions) | ||||||||||||||||
Interest income |
$ | 3 | $ | 3 | ||||||||||||
Interest expense |
(25 | ) | (29 | ) | ||||||||||||
Other income (expense), net |
18 | (6 | ) | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total |
$ | (4 | ) | $ | (32 | ) | $ | 28 | 88 | % | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Percentage of total net revenue |
0 | % | (2 | )% |
The decrease in non-operating expense, net is mainly driven by a realized gain from sale of short-term investments of $16 million during the three months ended June 28, 2013 coupled with lower amortization of debt issuance costs and discounts of $10 million when compared to the same period last year.
Provision for income taxes
Three Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||
June
28, 2013 |
June
29, 2012 |
Change in | ||||||||||||||
$ | % | |||||||||||||||
($ in millions) | ||||||||||||||||
Provision for income taxes |
$ | 63 | $ | 58 | $ | 5 | 9 | % | ||||||||
Effective tax rate on earnings |
29 | % | 27 | % |
The effective tax rate was approximately 29% and 27% for the three months ended June 28, 2013 and June 29, 2012, respectively.
For the three months ended June 28, 2013, the tax expense was reduced by $3 million in tax benefits primarily resulting from tax settlements, lapses of statutes of limitations, and prior year items. These tax benefits were offset by $6 million in tax expense resulting from the sale of short-term investments. For the three months ended June 29, 2012, the tax expense was reduced by $4 million in tax benefits primarily resulting from lapses of statutes of limitations and prior year items.
The provision for the three months ended June 28, 2013 and June 29, 2012 otherwise reflects a forecasted tax rate of 29% and 29%, respectively. The forecasted tax rates for both periods presented reflect the benefits of lower-taxed international earnings, domestic manufacturing incentives, and research and development credits (the U.S. federal R&D tax credit is currently set to expire on December 31, 2013), partially offset by state income taxes.
We are a U.S.-based multinational company subject to tax in multiple U.S. and international tax jurisdictions. A substantial portion of our international earnings were generated from subsidiaries organized in Ireland and Singapore. Our results of operations would be adversely affected to the extent that our geographical mix of income becomes more weighted toward jurisdictions with higher tax rates and would be favorably affected to the extent the relative geographic mix shifts to lower tax jurisdictions. Any change in our mix of earnings is dependent upon many factors and is therefore difficult to predict.
The timing of the resolution of income tax examinations is highly uncertain, and the amounts ultimately paid, if any, upon resolution of the issues raised by the taxing authorities may differ materially from the amounts accrued for each year. Although potential resolution of uncertain tax positions involve multiple tax periods and jurisdictions, it is reasonably possible that the gross unrecognized tax benefits related to these audits could decrease (whether by payment, release, or a combination of both) in the next 12 months by between $15 million and $130 million. Depending on the nature of the settlement or expiration of statutes of limitations, we estimate at least $15 million could affect our income tax provision and therefore benefit the resulting effective tax rate. As of June 28, 2013, we have $76 million on deposit with the IRS pertaining to U.S. tax matters in the Symantec 2005 through 2008 audit cycle.
25
Table of Contents
We continue to monitor the progress of ongoing tax controversies and the impact, if any, of the expected expiration of the statute of limitations in various taxing jurisdictions.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Sources of Cash
We have historically relied on cash flow from operations, borrowings under a credit facility, and issuances of debt and equity securities for our liquidity needs. As of June 28, 2013, we had cash and cash equivalents of $3.7 billion and an unused credit facility of $1.0 billion resulting in a liquidity position of approximately $4.7 billion. As of June 28, 2013, $2.2 billion in cash and cash equivalents were held by our foreign subsidiaries. We have provided U.S. deferred taxes on a portion of our undistributed foreign earnings sufficient to address the incremental U.S. tax that would be due if we need such portion of these funds to support our operations in the U.S.
Senior Notes: In the first quarter of fiscal 2013, we issued $600 million in principal amount of 2.75% senior notes due June 15, 2017 and $400 million in principal amount of 3.95% senior notes due June 15, 2022, for an aggregate principal amount of $1.0 billion. In the second quarter of fiscal 2011, we issued $350 million in principal amount of 2.75% senior notes due September 15, 2015 and $750 million in principal amount of 4.20% senior notes due September 15, 2020, for an aggregate principal amount of $1.1 billion.
Revolving Credit Facility: In the second quarter of fiscal 2011, we entered into a $1.0 billion senior unsecured revolving credit facility (credit facility), which was amended in the first quarter of 2013 to extend the term to June 7, 2017. Under the terms of this credit facility, we must comply with certain financial and non-financial covenants, including a debt to EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization) covenant. As of June 28, 2013, we were in compliance with all required covenants, and there was no outstanding balance on the credit facility.
We believe that our existing cash and investment balances, our borrowing capacity, our ability to issue new debt instruments, and cash generated from operations will be sufficient to meet our working capital and capital expenditure requirements, as well as any cash dividends to be paid under the capital allocation program announced in January 2013 and repurchases of our stock, for at least the next 12 months and foreseeable future. We have implemented a capital allocation strategy pursuant to which we expect to return over time approximately 50% of free cash flow to stockholders through a combination of dividends and share repurchases, while still enabling our company to invest in its future. Our strategy emphasizes organic growth through internal innovation and will be complemented by acquisitions that fit strategically and meet specific internal profitability hurdles.
Uses of Cash
Our principal cash requirements include working capital, capital expenditures, payments of principal and interest on our debt, and payments of taxes. Also, we may, from time to time, engage in the open market purchase of our notes prior to their maturity. Furthermore, our capital allocation strategy includes plans for a quarterly cash dividend. In addition, we regularly evaluate our ability to repurchase stock, pay debts and acquire other businesses.
Convertible Senior Notes: On June 15, 2013, the principal balance on our 1.00% notes matured and was settled by a cash payment of $1.0 billion, along with the $5 million semi-annual interest payment. In addition, we elected to pay the conversion value above par value in cash in the amount of $189 million. Concurrently with the payment of the conversion value, we received $189 million from our note hedge, which we had entered into at the time of the issuance of the 1.00% notes.
Stock Repurchases: For the three months ended June 28, 2013, we repurchased 5 million shares, or $125 million, of our common stock. During the three months ended June 29, 2012, we repurchased 19 million shares, or $301 million, of our common stock. As of June 28, 2013, we had $1.0 billion remaining under the plans authorized for future repurchases. This includes a new $1.0 billion stock repurchase program authorized by our board of directors during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2013.
26
Table of Contents
Dividend Program: During the three months ended June 28, 2013, we paid a cash dividend of $0.15 per share of common stock for a total of $105 million, which was recorded as a reduction to Additional paid-in capital. In addition, our board of directors approved dividend equivalent rights entitling holders of restricted stock and performance-based stock to dividend equivalents to be paid in the form of cash upon vesting, for each share of the underlying units. No dividends and dividend equivalents were paid in any periods prior to fiscal 2014. On July 30, 2013, our board of directors approved a quarterly dividend in the amount of $0.15 per share to be paid on September 18, 2013 to stockholders of record as of August 26, 2013. Any future dividends and dividend equivalents will be subject to the approval of our board of directors.
Restructuring Plan: In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2013, we announced our strategy to develop innovative products and services, change our go-to-market plans and simplify our organizational structure. We initiated a restructuring plan in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2013 to reduce management and redundant personnel resulting in headcount reductions across the Company. These actions are expected to be completed in fiscal 2014. As of June 28, 2013, total cost incurred to date is $74 million, primarily related to severance and related employee benefits. Including costs previously incurred in fiscal 2013, we expect our total cost for severance and benefits to be between $220 million and $250 million.
Acquisitions: During the three months ended June 29, 2012, we acquired a privately-held provider of mobile application management for an aggregate payment of $28 million, net of cash acquired.
Noncontrolling Interest: In July 2012, we completed a tender offer and paid $92 million to acquire VeriSign Japan common shares and stock rights, which increased our ownership percentage to 92%. In November 2012, we acquired the remaining 8% interest for $19 million and it became a wholly-owned subsidiary. The payment for the remaining 8% interest was made in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2013.
Cash Flows
The following table summarizes, for the periods indicated, selected items in our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows:
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
June 28, 2013 |
June 29, 2012 |
|||||||
(In millions) | ||||||||
Net cash provided by (used in): |
||||||||
Operating activities |
$ | 312 | $ | 340 | ||||
Investing activities |
(29 | ) | (83 | ) | ||||
Financing activities |
(1,192 | ) | 685 |
Operating Activities
Net cash provided by operating activities was $312 million for the three months ended June 28, 2013, which resulted from net income of $157 million adjusted for non-cash items, including depreciation and amortization charges of $161 million, as well as net changes in trade receivables resulting in inflows of $285 million. These amounts were partially offset by decreases in deferred revenue of $199 million and accrued compensation of $97 million.
Net cash provided by operating activities was $340 million for the three months ended June 29, 2012, which resulted from net income of $160 million adjusted for non-cash items, which largely included depreciation and amortization charges of $175 million, as well as net changes in trade receivables resulting in inflows of $307 million. These amounts were partially offset by decreases in deferred revenue of $187 million and in accrued compensation of $125 million.
27
Table of Contents
Investing Activities
Net cash used in investing activities was $29 million for the three months ended June 28, 2013 and was primarily due to payments of $61 million for capital expenditures, partially offset by $32 million in net proceeds from the sale of our short-term investments.
Net cash used in investing activities was $83 million for the three months ended June 29, 2012 and was primarily due to capital expenditures of $79 million and payments for acquisitions, net of cash acquired, of $28 million.
Financing Activities
Net cash used in financing activities was $1.2 billion for the three months ended June 28, 2013 and was primarily due to the repayment of our 1.00% notes of $1.2 billion, repurchases of our common stock of $125 million and a dividend payment of $105 million, partially offset by proceeds from the exercise of our note hedge of $189 million and proceeds from sales of common stock through employee stock plans of $54 million.
Net cash provided in financing activities was $685 million for the three months ended June 29, 2012 and was primarily due to the proceeds from our issuance of $600 million in principal amount of 2.75% interest-bearing senior notes due June 15, 2017 and $400 million in principal amount of 3.95% interest-bearing senior notes due June 15, 2022, net of discount, of $996 million, offset by the repurchases of our common stock of $301 million.
Contractual Obligations
There have been no significant changes during the three months ended June 28, 2013 to the contractual obligations disclosed in Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, set forth in Part II, Item 7, of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 29, 2013.
Indemnifications
In the ordinary course of business, we may provide indemnifications of varying scope and terms to customers, vendors, lessors, business partners, subsidiaries and other parties with respect to certain matters, including, but not limited to, losses arising out of our breach of agreements or representations and warranties made by us. In addition, our bylaws contain indemnification obligations to our directors, officers, employees and agents, and we have entered into indemnification agreements with our directors and certain of our officers to give such directors and officers additional contractual assurances regarding the scope of the indemnification set forth in our bylaws and to provide additional procedural protections. We maintain director and officer insurance, which may cover certain liabilities arising from our obligation to indemnify our directors and officers. It is not possible to determine the aggregate maximum potential loss under these indemnification agreements due to the limited history of prior indemnification claims and the unique facts and circumstances involved in each particular agreement. Such indemnification agreements might not be subject to maximum loss clauses. Historically, we have not incurred material costs as a result of obligations under these agreements and we have not accrued any liabilities related to such indemnification obligations in our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
We provide limited product warranties and the majority of our software license agreements contain provisions that indemnify licensees of our software from damages and costs resulting from claims alleging that our software infringes the intellectual property rights of a third party. Historically, payments made under these provisions have been immaterial. We monitor the conditions that are subject to indemnification to identify if a loss has occurred.
28
Table of Contents
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
There have been no significant changes in our market risk exposures during the three months ended June 28, 2013 as compared to the market risk exposures disclosed in Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, set forth in Part II, Item 7A, of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 29, 2013.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
(a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
The SEC defines the term disclosure controls and procedures to mean a companys controls and other procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported, within the time periods specified in the SECs rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by an issuer in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the issuers management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Our disclosure controls and procedures are designed to provide reasonable assurance that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management. Our management (with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer) has conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act). Based on such evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective at the reasonable assurance level as of the end of the period covered by this report.
(b) Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the three months ended June 28, 2013 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
(c) Limitations on Effectiveness of Controls
Our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, does not expect that our disclosure controls and procedures or our internal controls will prevent all errors and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within our company have been detected.
Information with respect to this Item may be found in Note 7 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in this Form 10-Q, which information is incorporated herein by reference.
A description of the risks associated with our business, financial condition, and results of operations is set forth in Part I, Item 1A, of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 29, 2013. There have been no material changes in our risks from such description.
29
Table of Contents
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
Stock repurchases during the three months ended June 28, 2013 were as follows:
ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
Total Number of Shares Purchased |
Average Price Paid per Share |
Total Number of Shares Purchased Under Publicly Announced Plans or Programs |
Maximum Dollar Value of Shares That May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs |
|||||||||||||
March 30, 2013 to April 26, 2013 |
2 | $ | 24.18 | 2 | $ | 1,106 | ||||||||||
April 27, 2013 to May 24, 2013 |
2 | $ | 24.18 | 2 | $ | 1,052 | ||||||||||
May 25, 2013 to June 28, 2013 |
1 | $ | 22.77 | 1 | $ | 1,033 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total |
5 | $ | 23.96 | 5 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
For information regarding our stock repurchase programs, see Note 8 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, which information is incorporated herein by reference.
30
Table of Contents
EXHIBIT INDEX
Incorporated by Reference | ||||||||||||
Exhibit |
Exhibit Description |
Form |
File |
Exhibit |
File |
Filed with | ||||||
10.01* | FY14 Executive Annual Incentive Plan President and Chief Executive Officer | X | ||||||||||
10.02* | FY14 Executive Annual Incentive Plan Vice President, Senior Vice President and Executive Vice President | X | ||||||||||
10.03* | Performance Contingent Stock Unit Award Agreement, dated May 30, 2013, by and between Symantec Corporation and Steve Bennett | X | ||||||||||
18.01 | Preferability Letter from Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm Regarding Change in Accounting Principle | X | ||||||||||
31.01 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | X | ||||||||||
31.02 | Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | X | ||||||||||
32.01 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | X | ||||||||||
32.02 | Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | X | ||||||||||
101.INS | XBRL Instance Document | X | ||||||||||
101.SCH | XBRL Taxonomy Schema Linkbase Document | X | ||||||||||
101.CAL | XBRL Taxonomy Calculation Linkbase Document | X | ||||||||||
101.DEF | XBRL Taxonomy Definition Linkbase Document | X | ||||||||||
101.LAB | XBRL Taxonomy Labels Linkbase Document | X | ||||||||||
101.PRE | XBRL Taxonomy Presentation Linkbase Document | X |
* | Indicates a management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement. |
| This exhibit is being furnished rather than filed, and shall not be deemed incorporated by reference into any filing, in accordance with Item 601 of Regulation S-K. |
31
Table of Contents
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
SYMANTEC CORPORATION | ||
(Registrant) | ||
By: | /s/ Stephen M. Bennett | |
Stephen M. Bennett | ||
President, Chief Executive Officer and Director | ||
By: | /s/ James A. Beer | |
James A. Beer | ||
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
Date: July 31, 2013
32