Genesis Healthcare, Inc. - Quarter Report: 2007 June (Form 10-Q)
Table of Contents
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
þ | Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2007.
OR
o | Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
For the transition period from to .
Commission file number: 001-33459
Skilled Healthcare Group, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
SEE TABLE OF ADDITIONAL
REGISTRANTS BELOW
Delaware | 20-3934755 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of | (IRS Employer | |
incorporation or organization) | Identification No.) | |
27442 Portola Parkway, Suite 200 | ||
Foothill Ranch, California | 92610 | |
(Address of principal executive offices) | (Zip Code) |
(949) 282-5800
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject
to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes o No þ
Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer,
or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of accelerated filer and large accelerated filer in
Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer o Accelerated filer o Non-accelerated filer þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as of
the close of business on August 7, 2007.
Class A common stock, $0.001 par value 19,166,666 shares
Class B common stock, $0.001 par value 17,730,928 shares
Class B common stock, $0.001 par value 17,730,928 shares
Table of Contents
TABLE OF ADDITIONAL
REGISTRANTS
(State or Other |
(Primary Standard |
|||||||||||
Jurisdiction of |
Industrial |
|||||||||||
Incorporation or |
Classification Code |
(I.R.S. Employer |
||||||||||
(Exact Names of Registrants as Specified in Their
Charters)
|
Organization) | Number) | Identification No.) | |||||||||
Alexandria Care Center, LLC
|
Delaware | 8051 | 95-4395382 | |||||||||
Alta Care Center, LLC
|
Delaware | 8051 | 20-0081141 | |||||||||
Anaheim Terrace Care Center, LLC
|
Delaware | 8051 | 20-0081125 | |||||||||
Baldwin Healthcare and
Rehabilitation Center, LLC
|
Delaware | 8051 | 20-1854609 | |||||||||
Bay Crest Care Center, LLC
|
Delaware | 8051 | 20-0081158 | |||||||||
Blue River Rehabilitation Center, LLC
|
Delaware | 8051 | 20-8386525 | |||||||||
Briarcliff Nursing and
Rehabilitation Center GP, LLC
|
Delaware | 8051 | 20-0080490 | |||||||||
Briarcliff Nursing and
Rehabilitation Center, LP
|
Delaware | 8051 | 20-0081646 | |||||||||
Brier Oak on Sunset, LLC
|
Delaware | 8051 | 95-4212165 | |||||||||
Cameron Nursing and Rehabilitation Center, LLC
|
Delaware | 8051 | 20-8571379 | |||||||||
Carehouse Healthcare Center, LLC
|
Delaware | 8051 | 20-0080962 | |||||||||
Carmel Hills Healthcare and
Rehabilitation Center, LLC
|
Delaware | 8051 | 20-4214320 | |||||||||
Carson Senior Assisted Living, LLC
|
Delaware | 8051 | 20-0081172 | |||||||||
Clairmont Beaumont GP, LLC
|
Delaware | 8051 | 20-0080531 | |||||||||
Clairmont Beaumont, LP
|
Delaware | 8051 | 20-0081662 | |||||||||
Clairmont Longview GP, LLC
|
Delaware | 8051 | 20-0080552 | |||||||||
Clairmont Longview, LP
|
Delaware | 8051 | 20-0081682 | |||||||||
Colonial New Braunfels Care
Center, LP
|
Delaware | 8051 | 20-0081694 | |||||||||
Colonial New Braunfels GP, LLC
|
Delaware | 8051 | 20-0080585 | |||||||||
Colonial Tyler Care Center, LP
|
Delaware | 8051 | 20-0081705 | |||||||||
Colonial Tyler GP, LLC
|
Delaware | 8051 | 20-0080596 | |||||||||
Comanche Nursing Center GP, LLC
|
Delaware | 8051 | 20-0080618 | |||||||||
Comanche Nursing Center, LP
|
Delaware | 8051 | 20-0081764 | |||||||||
Coronado Nursing Center GP, LLC
|
Delaware | 8051 | 20-0080630 | |||||||||
Coronado Nursing Center, LP
|
Delaware | 8051 | 20-0081776 | |||||||||
Devonshire Care Center, LLC
|
Delaware | 8051 | 20-0080978 | |||||||||
East Walnut Property, LLC
|
Delaware | 8051 | 20-4214556 | |||||||||
Elmcrest Care Center, LLC
|
Delaware | 8051 | 95-4274740 | |||||||||
Eureka Healthcare and
Rehabilitation Center, LLC
|
Delaware | 8051 | 20-0146285 | |||||||||
Flatonia Oak Manor GP, LLC
|
Delaware | 8051 | 20-0080645 | |||||||||
Flatonia Oak Manor, LP
|
Delaware | 8051 | 20-0081788 | |||||||||
Fountain Care Center, LLC
|
Delaware | 8051 | 20-0081005 | |||||||||
Fountain Senior Assisted Living,
LLC
|
Delaware | 8051 | 20-0081024 | |||||||||
Fountain View Subacute and Nursing
Center, LLC
|
Delaware | 8051 | 95-2506832 | |||||||||
Glen Hendren Property, LLC
|
Delaware | 8051 | 20-4214585 | |||||||||
Granada Healthcare and
Rehabilitation Center, LLC
|
Delaware | 8051 | 20-0146353 | |||||||||
Guadalupe Valley Nursing Center
GP, LLC
|
Delaware | 8051 | 20-0080693 | |||||||||
Guadalupe Valley Nursing Center, LP
|
Delaware | 8051 | 20-0081801 | |||||||||
Hallettsville Rehabilitation and
Nursing Center, LP
|
Delaware | 8051 | 20-0081807 | |||||||||
Hallettsville Rehabilitation GP,
LLC
|
Delaware | 8051 | 20-0080721 | |||||||||
Hallmark Investment Group,
Inc.
|
Delaware | 8051 | 95-4644786 | |||||||||
Hallmark Rehabilitation GP, LLC
|
Delaware | 8051 | 20-0083989 |
Table of Contents
(State or Other |
(Primary Standard |
|||||||||||
Jurisdiction of |
Industrial |
|||||||||||
Incorporation or |
Classification Code |
(I.R.S. Employer |
||||||||||
(Exact Names of Registrants as Specified in Their
Charters)
|
Organization) | Number) | Identification No.) | |||||||||
Hallmark Rehabilitation, LP
|
Delaware | 8051 | 20-0084046 | |||||||||
Hancock Park Rehabilitation
Center, LLC
|
Delaware | 8051 | 95-3918421 | |||||||||
Hancock Park Senior Assisted
Living, LLC
|
Delaware | 8051 | 95-3918420 | |||||||||
Hemet Senior Assisted Living, LLC
|
Delaware | 8051 | 20-0081183 | |||||||||
Highland Healthcare and
Rehabilitation Center, LLC
|
Delaware | 8051 | 20-1854718 | |||||||||
Holmesdale Healthcare and
Rehabilitation Center, LLC
|
Delaware | 8051 | 20-4214404 | |||||||||
Holmesdale Property, LLC
|
Delaware | 8051 | 20-4214625 | |||||||||
Hospice Care Investments, LLC
|
Delaware | 8051 | 20-0674503 | |||||||||
Hospice Care of the West, LLC
|
Delaware | 8051 | 20-0662232 | |||||||||
Hospice of the West, LP
|
Delaware | 8051 | 20-1138347 | |||||||||
Hospitality Nursing and
Rehabilitation Center, LP
|
Delaware | 8051 | 20-0081818 | |||||||||
Hospitality Nursing GP, LLC
|
Delaware | 8051 | 20-0080750 | |||||||||
Leasehold Resource Group, LLC
|
Delaware | 8051 | 20-0083961 | |||||||||
Liberty Terrace Healthcare and
Rehabilitation Center, LLC
|
Delaware | 8051 | 20-4214454 | |||||||||
Live Oak Nursing Center GP, LLC
|
Delaware | 8051 | 20-0080766 | |||||||||
Live Oak Nursing Center, LP
|
Delaware | 8051 | 20-0081828 | |||||||||
Louisburg Healthcare and
Rehabilitation Center, LLC
|
Delaware | 8051 | 20-1854747 | |||||||||
Montebello Care Center, LLC
|
Delaware | 8051 | 20-0081194 | |||||||||
Monument Rehabilitation and
Nursing Center, LP
|
Delaware | 8051 | 20-0081831 | |||||||||
Monument Rehabilitation GP, LLC
|
Delaware | 8051 | 20-0080781 | |||||||||
Oak Crest Nursing Center GP, LLC
|
Delaware | 8051 | 20-0080801 | |||||||||
Oak Crest Nursing Center, LP
|
Delaware | 8051 | 20-0081841 | |||||||||
Oakland Manor GP, LLC
|
Delaware | 8051 | 20-0080814 | |||||||||
Oakland Manor Nursing Center, LP
|
Delaware | 8051 | 20-0081854 | |||||||||
Pacific Healthcare and
Rehabilitation Center, LLC
|
Delaware | 8051 | 20-0146398 | |||||||||
Preferred Design, LLC
|
Delaware | 8051 | 20-4645757 | |||||||||
Richmond Healthcare and
Rehabilitation Center, LLC
|
Delaware | 8051 | 20-1854787 | |||||||||
Rio Hondo Subacute and Nursing
Center, LLC
|
Delaware | 8051 | 95-4274737 | |||||||||
Rossville Healthcare and
Rehabilitation Center, LLC
|
Delaware | 8051 | 20-1854816 | |||||||||
Royalwood Care Center, LLC
|
Delaware | 8051 | 20-0081209 | |||||||||
Seaview Healthcare and
Rehabilitation Center, LLC
|
Delaware | 8051 | 20-0146473 | |||||||||
Sharon Care Center, LLC
|
Delaware | 8051 | 20-0081226 | |||||||||
Shawnee Gardens Healthcare and
Rehabilitation Center, LLC
|
Delaware | 8051 | 20-1854845 | |||||||||
SHG Resources, LP
|
Delaware | 8051 | 20-0084078 | |||||||||
Skilled Healthcare, LLC
|
Delaware | 8051 | 20-0084014 | |||||||||
Southwest Payroll Services, LLC
|
Delaware | 8051 | 41-2115227 | |||||||||
Southwood Care Center GP, LLC
|
Delaware | 8051 | 20-0080824 | |||||||||
Southwood Care Center, LP
|
Delaware | 8051 | 20-0081861 |
Table of Contents
(State or Other |
(Primary Standard |
|||||||||||
Jurisdiction of |
Industrial |
|||||||||||
Incorporation or |
Classification Code |
(I.R.S. Employer |
||||||||||
(Exact Names of Registrants as Specified in Their
Charters)
|
Organization) | Number) | Identification No.) | |||||||||
Spring Senior Assisted Living, LLC
|
Delaware | 8051 | 20-0081045 | |||||||||
St. Elizabeth Healthcare and
Rehabilitation Center, LLC
|
Delaware | 8051 | 20-1609072 | |||||||||
St. Luke Healthcare and
Rehabilitation Center, LLC
|
Delaware | 8051 | 20-0366729 | |||||||||
St. Joseph Transitional
Rehabilitation Center, LLC
|
Delaware | 8051 | 20-4974918 | |||||||||
Summit Care Corporation
|
Delaware | 8051 | 95-3656297 | |||||||||
Summit Care Pharmacy, Inc.
|
Delaware | 8051 | 95-3747839 | |||||||||
Sycamore Park Care Center, LLC
|
Delaware | 8051 | 95-2260970 | |||||||||
Texas Cityview Care Center GP, LLC
|
Delaware | 8051 | 20-0080841 | |||||||||
Texas Cityview Care Center, LP
|
Delaware | 8051 | 20-0081871 | |||||||||
Texas Heritage Oaks Nursing and
Rehabilitation Center GP, LLC
|
Delaware | 8051 | 20-0080949 | |||||||||
Texas Heritage Oaks Nursing and
Rehabilitation Center, LP
|
Delaware | 8051 | 20-0081888 | |||||||||
The Clairmont Tyler GP, LLC
|
Delaware | 8051 | 20-0080856 | |||||||||
The Clairmont Tyler, LP
|
Delaware | 8051 | 20-0081909 | |||||||||
The Earlwood, LLC
|
Delaware | 8051 | 20-0081060 | |||||||||
The Heights of Summerlin, LLC
|
Delaware | 8051 | 20-1380043 | |||||||||
The Rehabilitation Center of Raymore, LLC
|
Delaware | 8051 | 20-8386866 | |||||||||
The Woodlands Healthcare Center
GP, LLC
|
Delaware | 8051 | 20-0080888 | |||||||||
The Woodlands Healthcare Center, LP
|
Delaware | 8051 | 20-0081923 | |||||||||
Town and Country Manor GP, LLC
|
Delaware | 8051 | 20-0080866 | |||||||||
Town and Country Manor, LP
|
Delaware | 8051 | 20-0081914 | |||||||||
Travelmark Staffing, LLC
|
Delaware | 8051 | 20-2905079 | |||||||||
Travelmark Staffing, LP
|
Delaware | 8051 | 20-3176804 | |||||||||
Valley Healthcare Center, LLC
|
Delaware | 8051 | 20-0081076 | |||||||||
Villa Maria Healthcare Center, LLC
|
Delaware | 8051 | 20-0081090 | |||||||||
Vintage Park at Atchison, LLC
|
Delaware | 8051 | 20-1854925 | |||||||||
Vintage Park at Baldwin City, LLC
|
Delaware | 8051 | 20-1854971 | |||||||||
Vintage Park at Gardner, LLC
|
Delaware | 8051 | 20-1855022 | |||||||||
Vintage Park at Lenexa, LLC
|
Delaware | 8051 | 20-1855099 | |||||||||
Vintage Park at Louisburg, LLC
|
Delaware | 8051 | 20-1855153 | |||||||||
Vintage Park at Osawatomie, LLC
|
Delaware | 8051 | 20-1855502 | |||||||||
Vintage Park at Ottawa, LLC
|
Delaware | 8051 | 20-1855554 | |||||||||
Vintage Park at Paola, LLC
|
Delaware | 8051 | 20-1855675 | |||||||||
Vintage Park at Stanley, LLC
|
Delaware | 8051 | 20-1855749 | |||||||||
Wathena Healthcare and
Rehabilitation Center, LLC
|
Delaware | 8051 | 20-1854880 | |||||||||
West Side Campus of Care GP, LLC
|
Delaware | 8051 | 20-0080879 | |||||||||
West Side Campus of Care, LP
|
Delaware | 8051 | 20-0081918 | |||||||||
Willow Creek Healthcare Center, LLC
|
Delaware | 8051 | 20-0081112 | |||||||||
Woodland Care Center, LLC
|
Delaware | 8051 | 20-0081237 |
The
address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area
code, of each additional registrants principal executive office
is 27442 Portola Parkway, Suite 200, Foothill Ranch, California 92610.
These
companies are listed as guarantors of the 11.0% senior subordinated
notes of the registrant. All of the equity securities of each of the
guarantors set forth in the table above are owned, either directly or
indirectly, by the registrant.
Skilled Healthcare Group, Inc.
Form 10-Q
For the Quarterly Period Ended June 30, 2007
For the Quarterly Period Ended June 30, 2007
Index
Page | ||||||||
Number | ||||||||
Part I. | 2 | |||||||
Item 1. | 2 | |||||||
2 | ||||||||
3 | ||||||||
4 | ||||||||
5 | ||||||||
7 | ||||||||
Item 2. | 18 | |||||||
Item 3. | 34 | |||||||
Item 4. | 35 | |||||||
Item 4T. | 35 | |||||||
Part II. | 36 | |||||||
Item 1. | 36 | |||||||
Item 1A. | 36 | |||||||
Item 2. | 54 | |||||||
Item 3. | 54 | |||||||
Item 4. | 54 | |||||||
Item 5. | 55 | |||||||
Item 6. | 55 | |||||||
Signature. | 58 | |||||||
EXHIBIT 2.6 | ||||||||
EXHIBIT 3.2 | ||||||||
EXHIBIT 10.3 | ||||||||
EXHIBIT 31.1 | ||||||||
EXHIBIT 31.2 | ||||||||
EXHIBIT 32 |
1
Table of Contents
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements.
Skilled Healthcare Group, Inc.
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
June 30, | December 31, | |||||||
2007 | 2006 | |||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||
Current assets: |
||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 2,333 | $ | 2,821 | ||||
Accounts receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts of
$8,472 and $7,889 at June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006,
respectively |
89,696 | 86,168 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes, net |
14,060 | 13,248 | ||||||
Prepaid expenses |
2,858 | 2,101 | ||||||
Other current assets |
14,527 | 10,296 | ||||||
Total current assets |
123,474 | 114,634 | ||||||
Property and equipment, net |
267,456 | 230,904 | ||||||
Other assets: |
||||||||
Notes receivable |
5,992 | 4,968 | ||||||
Deferred financing costs, net |
12,768 | 15,764 | ||||||
Goodwill |
418,857 | 411,349 | ||||||
Intangible assets, net |
32,565 | 33,843 | ||||||
Non-current income tax receivable |
1,882 | 1,882 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes, net |
1,367 | 1,504 | ||||||
Other assets |
20,431 | 23,847 | ||||||
Total other assets |
493,862 | 493,157 | ||||||
Total assets |
$ | 884,792 | $ | 838,695 | ||||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
||||||||
Current liabilities: |
||||||||
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
$ | 46,752 | $ | 69,136 | ||||
Employee compensation and benefits |
21,734 | 22,693 | ||||||
Current portion of long-term debt and capital leases |
2,957 | 3,177 | ||||||
Total current liabilities |
71,443 | 95,006 | ||||||
Long-term liabilities: |
||||||||
Insurance liability risks |
26,779 | 28,306 | ||||||
Other long-term liabilities |
20,168 | 8,857 | ||||||
Long-term debt and capital leases, less current portion |
405,591 | 465,878 | ||||||
Total liabilities |
523,981 | 598,047 | ||||||
Stockholders equity: |
||||||||
Preferred stock, 50,000
shares authorized, 25,000
Class A convertible shares
and 25,000 Class B shares. |
| | ||||||
Class A, $0.001 par value
per share; no shares and
22,312 shares issued and
outstanding at June 30,
2007 (unaudited) and
December 31, 2006,
respectively, liquidation
preference of $0 and
$18,652 at June 30, 2007
(unaudited) and December
31, 2006, respectively |
| 18,652 | ||||||
Class B, $0.001 par value
per share; no shares
issued and outstanding at
June 30, 2007 and
December 31, 2006,
respectively |
| | ||||||
Preferred stock, 25,000,000
shares authorized, $0.001
par value per share; no
shares issued and
outstanding at June 30,
2007 and December 31, 2006,
respectively |
| | ||||||
Common stock, 25,350,000
shares authorized, $0.001
par value per share; no
and 12,636,079 shares
issued and outstanding at
June 30, 2007 (unaudited)
and December 31, 2006,
respectively |
| 13 | ||||||
Class A common stock,
175,000,000 shares
authorized, $0.001 par
value per share; 19,166,666
and no shares issued and
outstanding at June 30,
2007 (unaudited) and
December 31, 2006,
respectively |
19 | | ||||||
Class B common stock,
30,000,000 shares
authorized, $0.001 par
value per share; 17,730,928
and no shares issued and
outstanding at June 30,
2007 (unaudited) and
December 31, 2006,
respectively |
18 | | ||||||
Additional paid-in-capital |
364,688 | 221,983 | ||||||
Retained deficit |
(3,914 | ) | | |||||
Total stockholders equity |
360,811 | 240,648 | ||||||
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
$ | 884,792 | $ | 838,695 | ||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
2
Table of Contents
Skilled Healthcare Group, Inc.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
Three Months Ended June 30, | ||||||||
2007 | 2006 | |||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||
Revenue |
$ | 151,091 | $ | 131,171 | ||||
Expenses: |
||||||||
Cost of services (exclusive of rent cost of sales and
depreciation and amortization shown below) |
113,494 | 98,430 | ||||||
Rent cost of sales |
2,527 | 2,302 | ||||||
General and administrative |
10,403 | 9,298 | ||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
4,239 | 3,573 | ||||||
130,663 | 113,603 | |||||||
Other income (expenses): |
||||||||
Interest expense |
(11,926 | ) | (11,612 | ) | ||||
Premium on redemption of debt and write-off of related
deferred financing costs |
(11,648 | ) | | |||||
Interest income and other |
684 | 242 | ||||||
Equity in earnings of joint venture |
353 | 511 | ||||||
Change in fair value of interest rate hedge |
| 77 | ||||||
Total other income (expenses), net |
(22,537 | ) | (10,782 | ) | ||||
(Loss) income before (benefit) provision for income taxes |
(2,109 | ) | 6,786 | |||||
(Benefit) provision for income taxes |
(556 | ) | 3,071 | |||||
Net (loss) income |
(1,553 | ) | 3,715 | |||||
Accretion on preferred stock |
(2,583 | ) | (4,540 | ) | ||||
Net loss attributable to common stockholders |
$ | (4,136 | ) | $ | (825 | ) | ||
Net loss per share data: |
||||||||
Net loss per common share, basic |
$ | (0.18 | ) | $ | (0.07 | ) | ||
Net loss per common share, diluted |
$ | (0.18 | ) | $ | (0.07 | ) | ||
Weighted-average common shares outstanding, basic |
23,436,598 | 11,634,129 | ||||||
Weighted-average common shares outstanding, diluted |
23,436,598 | 11,634,129 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
Table of Contents
Skilled Healthcare Group, Inc.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
Six Months Ended June 30, | ||||||||
2007 | 2006 | |||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||
Revenue |
$ | 295,746 | $ | 256,357 | ||||
Expenses: |
||||||||
Cost of services (exclusive of rent cost of
sales and depreciation and amortization shown
below) |
220,707 | 190,741 | ||||||
Rent cost of sales |
5,221 | 4,753 | ||||||
General and administrative |
21,900 | 18,864 | ||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
8,200 | 7,247 | ||||||
256,028 | 221,605 | |||||||
Other income (expenses): |
||||||||
Interest expense |
(24,018 | ) | (22,839 | ) | ||||
Premium on redemption of debt and write-off of
related deferred financing costs |
(11,648 | ) | | |||||
Interest income and other |
1,011 | 628 | ||||||
Equity in earnings of joint venture |
893 | 892 | ||||||
Change in fair value of interest rate hedge |
(33 | ) | 56 | |||||
Total other income (expenses), net |
(33,795 | ) | (21,263 | ) | ||||
Income before provision for income taxes |
5,923 | 13,489 | ||||||
Provision for income taxes |
2,822 | 5,672 | ||||||
Net income |
3,101 | 7,817 | ||||||
Accretion on preferred stock |
(7,354 | ) | (8,941 | ) | ||||
Net loss attributable to common stockholders |
$ | (4,253 | ) | $ | (1,124 | ) | ||
Net loss per share data: |
||||||||
Net loss per common share, basic |
$ | (0.24 | ) | $ | (0.10 | ) | ||
Net loss per common share, diluted |
$ | (0.24 | ) | $ | (0.10 | ) | ||
Weighted-average common shares outstanding, basic |
17,729,314 | 11,626,271 | ||||||
Weighted-average common shares outstanding, diluted |
17,729,314 | 11,626,271 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
Table of Contents
Skilled Healthcare Group, Inc.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
Six Months Ended | ||||||||
June 30, | ||||||||
2007 | 2006 | |||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||
Cash Flows from Operating Activities |
||||||||
Net income |
$ | 3,101 | $ | 7,817 | ||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: |
||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
8,200 | 7,247 | ||||||
Loss on disposal of property and equipment |
| 251 | ||||||
Provision for doubtful accounts |
2,515 | 2,431 | ||||||
Non-cash stock-based compensation |
256 | 35 | ||||||
Amortization of deferred financing costs |
1,421 | 1,424 | ||||||
Write-off of deferred financing costs and premium on early redemption of debt |
11,648 | | ||||||
Deferred income taxes |
(2,220 | ) | (396 | ) | ||||
Change in fair value of interest rate hedge |
33 | (56 | ) | |||||
Amortization of discount on senior subordinated notes |
82 | 82 | ||||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
||||||||
Accounts receivable |
(6,043 | ) | (15,502 | ) | ||||
Other current assets |
(3,991 | ) | 1,998 | |||||
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
(16,458 | ) | 11,143 | |||||
Employee compensation and benefits |
(928 | ) | 1,437 | |||||
Insurance liability risks |
(1,184 | ) | 2,183 | |||||
Other long-term liabilities |
11,311 | 131 | ||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
7,743 | 20,225 | ||||||
Cash Flows from Investing Activities |
||||||||
(Additions) principal payments on notes receivable, net |
(1,024 | ) | 415 | |||||
Acquisition of healthcare facilities |
(36,654 | ) | (34,016 | ) | ||||
Additions to property and equipment |
(12,627 | ) | (7,962 | ) | ||||
Changes in other assets |
3,260 | (4,803 | ) | |||||
Cash distributed related to the Onex Transaction |
(7,330 | ) | | |||||
Net cash used in investing activities |
(54,375 | ) | (46,366 | ) | ||||
Cash Flows from Financing Activities |
||||||||
Borrowings under line of credit, net |
10,500 | | ||||||
Repayments on long-term debt and capital leases |
(71,469 | ) | (1,457 | ) | ||||
Premium paid for redemption of debt |
(7,700 | ) | | |||||
Additions to deferred financing costs |
(1,993 | ) | (38 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from initial public offering of common stock, net of expenses |
116,806 | | ||||||
Proceeds from the issuance of new common stock |
| 100 | ||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
46,144 | (1,395 | ) | |||||
Decrease in cash and cash equivalents |
(488 | ) | (27,536 | ) | ||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
2,821 | 37,272 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
$ | 2,333 | $ | 9,736 | ||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
5
Table of Contents
Skilled Healthcare Group, Inc.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (continued)
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
Six Months Ended | ||||||||
June 30, | ||||||||
2007 | 2006 | |||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||
Supplemental cash flow information |
||||||||
Cash paid for: |
||||||||
Interest expense |
$ | 26,481 | $ | 10,061 | ||||
Income taxes |
$ | 10,620 | $ | | ||||
Details of accumulated other comprehensive loss: |
||||||||
Change in market value of marketable securities, net of tax |
$ | | $ | 225 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
6
Table of Contents
SKILLED HEALTHCARE GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
1. Description of Business
Current Business
Skilled Healthcare Group, Inc., through its subsidiaries (collectively the Company), is a
provider of integrated long-term healthcare services in its skilled nursing facilities and
rehabilitation therapy business. The Company also provides other related healthcare services,
including assisted living care and hospice care. The Company focuses on providing high-quality
care to its patients, and has a strong reputation for treating patients who require a high level of
skilled nursing care and extensive rehabilitation therapy, who it refers to as high-acuity
patients. As of June 30, 2007, the Company owned or leased 64 skilled nursing facilities (SNFs),
and 13 assisted living facilities (ALFs), together comprising approximately 8,900 licensed beds.
The Company currently owns approximately 75% of its facilities, which are located in California,
Texas, Kansas, Missouri and Nevada and are generally clustered in large urban or suburban markets.
In addition, the Company provides a variety of ancillary services, such as physical, occupational
and speech therapy in Company-operated facilities and unaffiliated facilities. Furthermore, the
Company owns and operates two licensed hospices providing palliative care in its California and
Texas markets. The Company is also a member in a joint venture located in Texas providing
institutional pharmacy services which currently serves approximately eight of the Companys SNFs
and other facilities unaffiliated with the Company.
Other Information
The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements as of June 30, 2007 and for the
three and six- month periods ended June 30, 2007 and 2006 (collectively, the Interim Financial
Statements), are unaudited. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in the
Companys annual consolidated financial statements have been condensed or omitted, as permitted
under applicable rules and regulations. Readers of the Interim Financial Statements should refer to
the Companys audited consolidated statements and notes thereto for the year ended December 31,
2006 which are included in the Companys Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 333-137897
(the Registration Statement) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC).
Management believes that the Interim Financial Statements reflect all adjustments which are of a
normal and recurring nature necessary to present fairly the Companys financial position and
results of operations in all material respects. The results of operations presented in the Interim
Financial Statements are not necessarily representative of operations for the entire year.
Recent Developments
Effective April 1, 2007, the Company purchased the owned real property, tangible assets,
intellectual property and related rights and licenses of three skilled nursing facilities located
in Missouri for a cash purchase price of $30.1 million, including $0.1 million of transaction
expenses. The Company also assumed certain liabilities under related operating contracts. The
transaction added approximately 426 beds, as well as 24 unlicensed apartments, to the Companys
operations. The acquisition was financed by draw downs of $30.1 million on the Companys revolving
credit facility.
In April 2007, the Companys board of directors approved the Companys amended and restated
certificate of incorporation to be effective immediately following the Companys initial public
offering (the IPO). The amended and restated certificate of incorporation:
| authorizes 25,000,000 shares of preferred stock, $0.001 par value; | ||
| authorizes 175,000,000 shares of class A common stock, voting power of one vote per share, $0.001 par value; | ||
| authorizes 30,000,000 shares of class B common stock, voting power of ten votes per share, $0.001 par value; and |
7
Table of Contents
SKILLED HEALTHCARE GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (Continued)
| provides for mandatory and optional conversion of the class B common stock into class A common stock on a one-for-one basis under certain circumstances. |
In April 2007, the Companys board of directors also approved a 507-for-one split of the
Companys common stock. As a result, share numbers and per share amounts for all periods presented
in the condensed consolidated financial statements throughout this Form 10-Q reflect the effects of
this stock split.
In May 2007, in connection with the Companys IPO, the Company sold 8,333,333 shares of class
A common stock and selling stockholders sold 10,833,333 shares of class A common stock, each at the
IPO price of $15.50, for net proceeds to the Company of approximately $116.8 million. Concurrently
with the closing of the IPO, all previously outstanding shares of class A preferred stock converted
into shares of the Companys new class B common stock.
2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Information regarding the Companys significant accounting policies is contained in Note 2,
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, to the Companys consolidated financial statements
included in the Registration Statement. Presented below in this and the following notes is
supplemental information that should be read in conjunction with Note 2 to the Companys
consolidated financial statements included in the Registration Statement.
Basis of Presentation
The condensed consolidated financial statements of the Company include the accounts of the
Company and the Companys wholly-owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany transactions have
been eliminated in consolidation.
8
Table of Contents
SKILLED HEALTHCARE GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (Continued)
Estimates and Assumptions
The preparation of the condensed consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S.
generally accepted accounting principles, or GAAP, requires management to make estimates and
assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent
assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues
and expenses during the reporting period. The most significant estimates in the Companys condensed
consolidated financial statements relate to revenue, allowance for doubtful accounts, the
self-insured portion of general and professional liability claims, and impairment of long-lived
assets. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Revenue and Accounts Receivable
Revenue and accounts receivable are recorded on an accrual basis as services are performed at
their estimated net realizable value. The Company derives a significant amount of its revenue from
funds under federal Medicare and state Medicaid assistance programs, the continuation of which are
dependent upon governmental policies, audit risk and potential recoupment.
The Companys revenue is derived from services provided to patients in the following payor
classes (dollars in thousands):
Three Months Ended June 30, | ||||||||||||||||
2007 | 2006 | |||||||||||||||
(Unaudited) | (Unaudited) | |||||||||||||||
Revenue | Percentage | Revenue | Percentage | |||||||||||||
Dollars | of Revenue | Dollars | of Revenue | |||||||||||||
Medicare |
$ | 56,134 | 37.1 | % | $ | 47,903 | 36.5 | % | ||||||||
Medicaid |
45,746 | 30.3 | 41,348 | 31.5 | ||||||||||||
Subtotal Medicare and Medicaid |
101,880 | 67.4 | 89,251 | 68.0 | ||||||||||||
Managed Care |
12,668 | 8.4 | 10,543 | 8.0 | ||||||||||||
Private and Other |
36,543 | 24.2 | 31,377 | 24.0 | ||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 151,091 | 100.0 | % | $ | 131,171 | 100.0 | % | ||||||||
Six Months Ended June 30, | ||||||||||||||||
2007 | 2006 | |||||||||||||||
(Unaudited) | (Unaudited) | |||||||||||||||
Revenue | Percentage | Revenue | Percentage | |||||||||||||
Dollars | of Revenue | Dollars | of Revenue | |||||||||||||
Medicare |
$ | 111,421 | 37.6 | % | $ | 94,074 | 36.7 | % | ||||||||
Medicaid |
88,359 | 29.9 | 81,110 | 31.6 | ||||||||||||
Subtotal Medicare and Medicaid |
199,780 | 67.5 | 175,184 | 68.3 | ||||||||||||
Managed Care |
24,418 | 8.3 | 20,580 | 8.0 | ||||||||||||
Private and Other |
71,548 | 24.2 | 60,593 | 23.7 | ||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 295,746 | 100.0 | % | $ | 256,357 | 100.0 | % | ||||||||
Stock Options and Equity Related Charges
On January 1, 2006, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards, or
SFAS, No. 123 (revised), Share-Based Payments, or SFAS No. 123R, which requires measurement and
recognition of compensation expense for all share-based payment awards made to employees and
directors. Under SFAS No. 123R, the fair value of share-based payment awards is estimated at grant
date using an option pricing model and the portion that is ultimately expected to vest is
recognized as compensation cost over the requisite service period.
9
Table of Contents
SKILLED HEALTHCARE GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (Continued)
The Company adopted SFAS No. 123R using the modified prospective application method. Under the
modified prospective application method, prior periods are not revised for comparative purposes.
The valuation provisions of SFAS No. 123R apply to new awards and awards that are outstanding on
the adoption effective date that are subsequently modified or cancelled. The Company did not have
stock options outstanding subsequent to December 27, 2005 through May 18, 2007, the date of the
Companys IPO. As the Company had no options outstanding during this period, the initial
implementation of SFAS No. 123R had no impact on the Companys financial statements.
Equity-related charges included in general and administrative expenses in the Companys
consolidated statements of operations were $241,000 and $256,000 in the three- and six-month
periods ended June 30, 2007, respectively, and $20,000 and $35,000 in the three and six month
periods ended June 30, 2006, respectively.
Net Income (Loss) Per Share of Class A and Class B Common Stock
The Company computes net (loss) income per share of class A common stock and class B common
stock in accordance with SFAS No. 128, Earnings Per Share, using the two-class method. The
Companys class A common stock and class B common stock are identical in all respects, except with
respect to voting rights and except that each share of class B common stock is convertible into one
share of class A common stock under certain circumstances. Therefore, net (loss) income is
allocated on a proportionate basis.
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted net (loss) income per
share of class A common stock and class B common stock for the three- and six-month periods ended
June 30, 2007 (dollars in thousands, except per share data):
Three Months Ended June 30, 2007 | Six Months Ended June 30, 2007 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
(Unaudited) | (Unaudited) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Class A | Class B | Total | Class A | Class B | Total | |||||||||||||||||||
Net loss per share, basic |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Numerator: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Allocation of loss
attributable to common
stockholders |
$ | (1,598 | ) | $ | (2,538 | ) | $ | (4,136 | ) | $ | (1,092 | ) | $ | (3,161 | ) | $ | (4,253 | ) | ||||||
Denominator: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Weighted-average common shares
outstanding |
9,056,776 | 14,379,822 | 23,436,598 | 4,553,407 | 13,175,907 | 17,729,314 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net loss per common share, basic |
$ | (0.18 | ) | $ | (0.18 | ) | $ | (0.18 | ) | $ | (0.24 | ) | $ | (0.24 | ) | $ | (0.24 | ) | ||||||
Net (loss) income per share,
diluted |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Numerator: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Allocation of loss
attributable to common
stockholders |
$ | (1,598 | ) | $ | (2,538 | ) | $ | (4,136 | ) | $ | (1,092 | ) | $ | (3,161 | ) | $ | (4,253 | ) | ||||||
Denominator: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Weighted-average common shares
outstanding |
9,056,776 | 14,379,822 | 23,436,598 | 4,553,407 | 13,175,907 | 17,729,314 | ||||||||||||||||||
Plus: incremental shares
related to dilutive effect of
stock options and restricted
stock, if applicable |
| | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Adjusted weighted-average
common shares outstanding |
9,056,776 | 14,379,822 | 23,436,598 | 4,553,407 | 13,175,907 | 17,729,314 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net loss per common share, diluted |
$ | (0.18 | ) | $ | (0.18 | ) | $ | (0.18 | ) | $ | (0.24 | ) | $ | (0.24 | ) | $ | (0.24 | ) | ||||||
10
Table of Contents
SKILLED HEALTHCARE GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (Continued)
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In September 2006, the Financial Standards Accounting Board, or FASB, issued SFAS No. 157,
Fair Value Measurements, or SFAS No. 157. SFAS No. 157 addresses differences in the definition of
fair value and provides guidance in applying the definition of fair value to the many accounting
pronouncements that require fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 emphasizes that (1) fair value is
a market-based measurement that should be determined based on assumptions that market participants
would use in pricing the asset or liability for sale or transfer and (2) fair value is not
entity-specific but based on assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or
liability. Finally, SFAS No. 157 establishes a hierarchy of fair value assumptions that
distinguishes between independent market participant assumptions and the reporting entitys own
assumptions about market participant assumptions. SFAS No. 157 is effective for financial
statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, and interim periods within
those fiscal years. The Company does not expect that SFAS No. 157 will have a material effect on
its consolidated results of operations, financial position or liquidity.
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and
Financial Liabilities, or SFAS No. 159. SFAS No. 159 expands opportunities to use fair value
measurement in financial reporting and permits entities to choose to measure many financial
instruments and certain other items at fair value. SFAS No. 159 is effective for fiscal years
beginning after November 15, 2007. The Company has not determined whether it will adopt SFAS No.
159 early or if it will choose to measure any eligible financial assets and liabilities at fair
value. Management is still in the process of evaluating the effect, if any, on the Company of
adopting SFAS No. 159.
Reclassifications
Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to current year presentation.
3. Business Segments
The Company has two reportable operating segments long-term care services, which includes
the operation of skilled nursing and assisted living facilities and is the most significant portion
of the Companys business, and ancillary services, which includes the Companys rehabilitation
therapy and hospice businesses. The other category includes general and administrative items and
eliminations. The Companys reporting segments are business
units that offer different
services, and that are managed separately due to the nature of the services provided or the
products sold.
At June 30, 2007, long-term care services were provided by 64 SNF subsidiaries that offer
sub-acute, rehabilitative and specialty skilled nursing care, as well as 13 ALF subsidiaries that
provide room and board and social services. Ancillary services include rehabilitative therapy
services such as physical, occupational and speech therapy provided in the Companys facilities and
in unaffiliated facilities by its subsidiary, Hallmark Rehabilitative Services, Inc. Also included
in the ancillary services segment is the Companys hospice business.
The Company evaluates performance and allocates resources to each segment based on an
operating model that is designed to maximize the quality of care provided and profitability.
Accordingly, EBITDA is used as the primary measure of each segments operating results because it
does not include such costs as interest expense, income taxes, and depreciation and amortization
which may vary from segment to segment depending upon various factors, including the method used to
finance the original purchase of a segment or the tax law of the states in which a segment
operates. By excluding these items, the Company is better able to evaluate operating performance of
the segment by focusing on more controllable measures. General and administrative overhead is not
allocated to any segment for purposes of determining segment profit or loss, and is included in the
other category in the selected segment financial data that follows. The accounting policies of
the reporting segments are the same as those described in the accounting policies (Note 2) included
in the Registration Statement. Intersegment sales and transfers are recorded at cost plus standard
mark-up; intersegment transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
11
Table of Contents
SKILLED HEALTHCARE GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (Continued)
The following table sets forth selected financial data by business segment (dollars in
thousands):
Long-term | Ancillary | |||||||||||||||
Care Services | Services | Other | Total | |||||||||||||
Three months ended June 30, 2007 (unaudited) |
||||||||||||||||
Revenue from external customers |
$ | 131,929 | $ | 19,038 | $ | 124 | $ | 151,091 | ||||||||
Intersegment revenue |
| 14,892 | | 14,892 | ||||||||||||
Total revenue |
$ | 131,929 | $ | 33,930 | $ | 124 | $ | 165,983 | ||||||||
Segment capital expenditures |
$ | 5,842 | $ | 139 | $ | 267 | $ | 6,248 | ||||||||
EBITDA(1) |
$ | 20,728 | $ | 4,871 | $ | (12,227 | ) | $ | 13,372 | |||||||
Three months ended June 30, 2006 (unaudited) |
||||||||||||||||
Revenue from external customers |
$ | 116,291 | $ | 14,786 | $ | 94 | $ | 131,171 | ||||||||
Intersegment revenue |
| 12,699 | | 12,699 | ||||||||||||
Total revenue |
$ | 116,291 | $ | 27,485 | $ | 94 | $ | 143,870 | ||||||||
Segment capital expenditures |
$ | 4,508 | $ | 94 | $ | 168 | $ | 4,770 | ||||||||
EBITDA(1) |
$ | 16,846 | $ | 4,694 | $ | 189 | $ | 21,729 |
Long-term | Ancillary | |||||||||||||||
Care Services | Services | Other | Total | |||||||||||||
Six months ended June 30, 2007 (unaudited) |
||||||||||||||||
Revenue from external customers |
$ | 257,926 | $ | 37,570 | $ | 250 | $ | 295,746 | ||||||||
Intersegment revenue |
| 29,360 | | 29,360 | ||||||||||||
Total revenue |
$ | 257,926 | $ | 66,930 | $ | 250 | $ | 325,106 | ||||||||
Segment total assets (2) |
$ | 532,631 | $ | 71,300 | $ | 280,861 | $ | 884,792 | ||||||||
Goodwill and intangibles included in total assets (2) |
$ | 414,876 | $ | 36,546 | $ | | $ | 451,422 | ||||||||
Segment capital expenditures |
$ | 14,408 | $ | 361 | $ | (2,142 | ) | $ | 12,627 | |||||||
EBITDA(1) |
$ | 41,406 | $ | 9,960 | $ | (14,236 | ) | $ | 37,130 | |||||||
Six months ended June 30, 2006 (unaudited) |
||||||||||||||||
Revenue from external customers |
$ | 227,989 | $ | 28,232 | $ | 136 | $ | 256,357 | ||||||||
Intersegment revenue |
| 24,533 | | 24,533 | ||||||||||||
Total revenue |
$ | 227,989 | $ | 52,765 | $ | 136 | $ | 280,890 | ||||||||
Segment total assets (3) |
$ | 682,018 | $ | 117,400 | $ | 33,684 | $ | 833,102 | ||||||||
Goodwill and intangibles included in total assets (3) |
$ | 378,949 | $ | 64,123 | $ | | $ | 443,072 | ||||||||
Segment capital expenditures |
$ | 7,102 | $ | 213 | $ | 647 | $ | 7,962 | ||||||||
EBITDA(1) |
$ | 35,328 | $ | 8,113 | $ | (494 | ) | $ | 42,947 |
(1) | EBITDA is defined as net income before depreciation, amortization and interest expense (net) and the provision for income taxes. See reconciliation of net (loss) income to EBITDA and a discussion of its uses and limitations on pages 23-25 of this quarterly report. | |
(2) | Balance sheet information as of June 30, 2007. | |
(3) | Balance sheet information as of June 30, 2006. |
4. Income Taxes
For the three months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, the Company recognized an income tax
benefit of $0.6 million and income tax expense of $3.1 million, respectively, which was primarily
related to the Companys effective tax rate applied to the Companys operating (loss) income.
12
Table of Contents
SKILLED HEALTHCARE GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (Continued)
For the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, the Company recognized income tax expense of
$2.8 million and $5.7 million, respectively, which primarily was related to the Companys effective
tax rate applied to the Companys operating income.
The Company adopted the provisions of FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty
in Income Taxes An Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109, or FIN No. 48, on January 1, 2007.
FIN No. 48 clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an enterprises
financial statements in accordance with FASB Statement No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes, and
prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement criteria for the financial statement recognition
and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. FIN No. 48 also
provides guidance on de-recognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim
periods, disclosure and transition. As a result of the adoption of FIN No. 48, the Company recorded
a $1.5 million increase in goodwill and taxes payable as of January 1, 2007. As of January 1, 2007,
the total amount of unrecognized tax benefit was $11.1 million. If reversed, the entire decrease in
the unrecognized benefit amount would result in a reduction to the balance of goodwill recorded in
connection with the acquisition of the Company by Onex Partners LP, Onex American Holdings II LLC
and Onex U.S. Principals LP, collectively referred to as Onex.
The Company recognizes interest and penalties associated with unrecognized tax benefits in the
(Benefit) Provision for income taxes line item of the condensed consolidated statements of
operations. As of January 1, 2007, the Company had accrued approximately $2.7 million in interest
and penalties, net of approximately $0.6 million of tax benefit, related to unrecognized tax
benefits. A substantial portion of the accrued interest and penalties relate to periods prior to
the acquisition of the Company by Onex. If reversed, approximately $2.1 million of the reversal of
interest and penalties would result in a reduction to goodwill.
The Company and its subsidiaries file income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction and
various state jurisdictions. With few exceptions, the Company is no longer subject to U.S. federal
or state income tax examinations by tax authorities for years before 2002. During the first quarter
of 2007, the Company agreed to an adjustment related to depreciation claimed on its 2003 federal
tax return and is awaiting assessment. As a result, the Company anticipates that there is a
reasonable possibility that the amount of unrecognized tax benefits will decrease by $1.8 million
due to the settlement of the 2003 federal tax depreciation matters during 2007. In addition, due to
normal closures of the statute of limitations, the Company anticipates that there is a reasonable
possibility that the amount of unrecognized state tax benefits will decrease by approximately $0.4
million within the next 12 months.
5. Other Current Assets and Other Assets
Other current assets consist of the following at June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006 (dollars in
thousands):
June 30, 2007 | December 31, 2006 | |||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||
Receivable from escrow |
$ | 7,031 | $ | 6,000 | ||||
Income tax refund receivable |
2,512 | | ||||||
Supply inventories |
2,093 | 2,152 | ||||||
Other notes receivable |
2,891 | 2,144 | ||||||
$ | 14,527 | $ | 10,296 | |||||
Other assets consist of the following at June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006 (dollars in
thousands):
June 30, 2007 | December 31, 2006 | |||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||
Equity investment in pharmacy joint venture |
$ | 4,113 | $ | 4,170 | ||||
Restricted cash |
7,721 | 8,448 | ||||||
Investments |
3,421 | 4,856 | ||||||
Deposits and other assets |
5,176 | 4,695 | ||||||
Expenses related to initial public offering |
| 1,678 | ||||||
$ | 20,431 | $ | 23,847 | |||||
13
Table of Contents
SKILLED HEALTHCARE GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (Continued)
6. Commitments and Contingencies
Litigation
As is typical in the health care industry, the Company has experienced an increasing trend in
the number and severity of litigation claims asserted against it. While the Company believes that
it provides quality care to its patients and is in substantial compliance with regulatory
requirements, a legal judgment or adverse governmental investigation could have a material negative
effect on the Companys financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
The Company is involved in various lawsuits and claims arising in the ordinary course of
business. These matters are, in the opinion of management, immaterial both individually and in the
aggregate with respect to the Companys condensed consolidated financial position, results of
operations and cash flows.
Under GAAP, the Company establishes an accrual for an estimated loss contingency when it is
both probable that an asset has been impaired or that a liability has been incurred and the amount
of the loss can be reasonably estimated. Given the uncertain nature of litigation generally, and
the uncertainties related to the incurrence, amount and range of loss on any pending litigation,
investigation or claim, the Company is currently unable to predict the ultimate outcome of any
litigation, investigation or claim, determine whether a liability has been incurred or make a
reasonable estimate of the liability that could result from an unfavorable outcome. While the
Company believes that the liability, if any, resulting from the aggregate amount of uninsured
damages for any outstanding litigation, investigation or claim will not have a material adverse
effect on its condensed consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows, in
view of the uncertainties discussed above, it could incur charges in excess of any currently
established accruals and, to the extent available, excess liability insurance. In view of the
unpredictable nature of such matters, the Company cannot provide any assurances regarding the
outcome of any litigation, investigation or claim to which it is a party or the effect on the
Company of an adverse ruling in such matters. As additional information becomes available, the
Company will assess its potential liability and revise its estimates.
Insurance
The Company maintains insurance for general and professional liability, workers compensation,
employee benefits liability, property, casualty, directors and officers liability, inland marine,
crime, boiler and machinery, automobile, employment practices liability and earthquake and flood.
The Company believes that its insurance programs are adequate and where there has been a direct
transfer of risk to the insurance carrier, the Company does not recognize a liability in the
condensed consolidated financial statements.
Workers Compensation. The Company has maintained workers compensation insurance as
statutorily required. Most of its commercial workers compensation insurance purchased is loss
sensitive in nature. As a result, the Company is responsible for adverse loss development.
Additionally, the Company self-insures the first unaggregated $1.0 million per workers
compensation claim in both California and Nevada.
The Company has elected to not carry workers compensation insurance in Texas and it may be
liable for negligence claims that are asserted against it by its employees.
The Company has purchased guaranteed cost policies for Kansas and Missouri. There are no
deductibles associated with these programs. The Company recognizes a liability in its condensed
consolidated financial statements for its estimated self-insured workers compensation risks.
Historically, estimated liabilities have been sufficient to cover actual claims.
14
Table of Contents
SKILLED HEALTHCARE GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (Continued)
General and Professional Liability. The Companys skilled nursing services subject it to
certain liability risks. Malpractice claims may be asserted against the Company if its services are
alleged to have resulted in patient injury or other adverse effects, the risk of which may be
greater for higher-acuity patients, such as those receiving specialty and sub-acute services, than
for traditional long-term care patients. The Company has from time to time been subject to
malpractice claims and other litigation in the ordinary course of business.
From April 10, 2001 to August 31, 2006, the Company maintained a retrospectively rated
claims-made policy with a self-insured retention of $0.3 million for its California and Nevada
facilities and $1.0 million for its Texas facilities. This policy had an occurrence and annual
aggregate limit of $5.0 million each for professional liability and general liability losses.
Effective September 1, 2006, the Company obtained professional and general liability insurance
with an individual claim limit of $2.0 million per loss and a $6.0 million annual aggregate limit
for its California, Texas and Nevada facilities. Under this program, the Company retains an
unaggregated $1.0 million self-insured professional and general liability retention per claim.
The Companys Kansas facilities are insured on an occurrence basis with an occurrence and
aggregate coverage limit of $1.0 million and $3.0 million, respectively, and there are no
self-insurance retentions under these contracts. The Companys Missouri facilities are underwritten
on a claims-made basis with no self-insured retention and have an individual claim and aggregate
coverage limit of $1.0 million and $3.0 million, respectively.
In September 2004, the Company purchased a multi-year aggregate excess professional and
general liability insurance policy providing an additional $10.0 million of coverage for losses
arising from claims in excess of $5.0 million in California, Texas, Nevada, Kansas or Missouri. As
of September 1, 2006, this excess coverage was modified to increase the coverage to $12.0 million
for losses arising from claims in excess of $3.0 million which are reported after the September 1,
2006 change.
A summary of the liabilities related to insurance risks are as follows (dollars in thousands):
June 30, 2007 | December 31, 2006 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
General and | General and | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Professional | Workers | Professional | Workers | |||||||||||||||||||||
Liability | Compensation | Total | Liability | Compensation | Total | |||||||||||||||||||
Current |
$ | 16,430 | (1) | $ | 3,033 | (2) | $ | 19,463 | $ | 16,056 | (1) | $ | 3,064 | (2) | $ | 19,120 | ||||||||
Non current |
18,422 | 8,357 | 26,779 | 20,591 | 7,715 | 28,306 | ||||||||||||||||||
$ | 34,852 | $ | 11,390 | $ | 46,242 | $ | 36,647 | $ | 10,779 | $ | 47,426 | |||||||||||||
(1) | Included in accounts payable and accrued liabilities. | |
(2) | Included in employee compensation benefits. |
Financial Guarantees
Substantially all of the Companys subsidiaries guarantee the 11.0% senior subordinated notes
maturing on January 15, 2014, the Companys first lien senior secured term loan and the Companys
revolving credit facility. The guarantees provided by the subsidiaries are full and unconditional
and joint and several. Other subsidiaries of the Company that are not guarantors are considered
minor.
15
Table of Contents
SKILLED HEALTHCARE GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (Continued)
7. Stockholders Equity
In April 2007, the Companys board of directors approved the Companys amended and restated
certificate of incorporation, which became effective on May 18, 2007. The amended and restated
certificate of incorporation:
| authorizes 25,000,000 shares of preferred stock, $0.001 par value; | ||
| authorizes 175,000,000 shares of class A common stock, voting power of one vote per share, $0.001 par value; | ||
| authorizes 30,000,000 shares of class B common stock, voting power of ten votes per share, $0.001 par value; and | ||
| provides for mandatory and optional conversion of the class B common stock into class A common stock on a one-for-one basis under certain circumstances. |
In April 2007, the Companys board of directors also approved a 507-for-one split of the
Companys common stock. As a result, share numbers and per share amounts for all periods presented
in the condensed consolidated financial statements throughout this Form 10-Q reflect the effects of
this stock split.
In May 2007, in connection with the Companys IPO, the Company sold 8,333,333 shares of class
A common stock and the selling stockholders sold 10,833,333 shares of class A common stock, each at
the IPO price of $15.50, for net proceeds to the Company of approximately $116.8 million.
Concurrently with the closing of the IPO, all outstanding shares of class A preferred stock
converted into the Companys new class B common stock.
2007 Incentive Award Plan
The Company adopted the Skilled Healthcare Group, Inc. 2007 Incentive Award Plan (the 2007
Plan) in April 2007. Under the 2007 Plan, incentive and nonqualified stock options or rights to
purchase common stock and various other equity awards may be granted to eligible participants. The
Company granted 134,000 options to purchase shares of class A common stock effective on the date of
its IPO in May 2007, with no additional grants made through June 30, 2007.
Determining Fair Value
Valuation and Amortization Method. The Company estimated the fair value of stock options
granted using the Black-Scholes-option-pricing formula and a single option award approach. This
fair value is then amortized ratably over the requisite service periods of the awards, which is
generally the vesting period.
Expected Term. The Companys expected term represents the period that the Companys
stock-based awards are expected to be outstanding and was estimated based upon the mid-point of the
estimated weighted-average vesting term and the contractual term of ten years.
Expected Volatility. Expected volatility was estimated based upon the implied and historical
volatilities of publicly-traded comparable companies over the expected term.
Expected Dividend. The Black-Scholes valuation model calls for a single expected dividend
yield as an input and the Company has no plans to pay dividends.
Risk-Free Interest Rate. The risk-free interest rate was estimated based upon the spot rates
for U.S. treasury strips at the time of the grant for periods corresponding with the expected terms
of the options.
Estimated Forfeitures. The estimated forfeiture rate was based on the Companys historical
turnover in the employee groups for which the options were granted.
16
Table of Contents
SKILLED HEALTHCARE GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (Continued)
The fair value of the stock option grants for each of the three- and six-month periods ended
June 30, 2007 under SFAS No. 123R was estimated on the date of the grants using the Black-Scholes
option pricing model with the following assumptions:
Risk-free interest rate |
4.62 | % | ||
Expected life |
5.75 years | |||
Dividend yield |
0 | % | ||
Volatility |
32.00 | % | ||
Estimated forfeitures |
9.00 | % | ||
Weighted-average fair value |
$ | 6.09 |
There were no options exercised during the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2007.
The total grant date fair value of stock options vested during each of the three- and six-month
periods ended June 30, 2007 was $204,000. As of June 30, 2007, there was $461,000 of unrecognized
compensation cost related to outstanding stock options, net of forecasted forfeitures. This amount
is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 3.0 years. To the extent the
forfeiture rate is different than the Company has anticipated, stock-based compensation related to
these awards will be different from the Companys expectations.
The following table summarizes stock option activity during the six months ended June 30, 2007
under the 2007 Plan:
Weighted- | ||||||||||||||||
Average | ||||||||||||||||
Weighted - | Remaining | |||||||||||||||
Average | Contractual | Aggregate | ||||||||||||||
Number of | Exercise | Term | Intrinsic | |||||||||||||
Shares | Price | (in years) | Value | |||||||||||||
Outstanding at January 1, 2007 |
| $ | | |||||||||||||
Granted |
134,000 | $ | 15.50 | |||||||||||||
Exercised |
| $ | | |||||||||||||
Forfeited or cancelled |
| $ | | |||||||||||||
Outstanding at June 30, 2007 |
134,000 | $ | 15.50 | 9.83 | $ | 816 | ||||||||||
Exercisable at June 30, 2007 |
33,500 | $ | 15.50 | 9.83 | $ | 204 |
8. Subsequent Events
On July 31, 2007, the Company and certain affiliates of Laurel
Healthcare Providers, LLC, entered into definitive agreements, pursuant to which the Company will acquire substantially
all the assets and assume the operations of several inter-related
companies related to ten skilled nursing facilities and a
hospice company, all of which are located in or around Albuquerque,
New Mexico, for approximately $51.5 million. The acquired
facilities will add 1,180 beds to the Companys operations.
17
Table of Contents
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
This Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations is
intended to assist in understanding and assessing the trends and significant changes in our results
of operations and financial condition. Historical results may not indicate future performance. Our
forward-looking statements reflect our current views about future events, are based on assumptions
and are subject to known and unknown risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to
differ materially from those contemplated by these statements. Factors that may cause differences
between actual results and those contemplated by forward-looking statements include, but are not
limited to, those discussed in Part II, Item 1A, Risk Factors, of this quarterly report. As used
in this Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, the
words, we, our and us refer to Skilled Healthcare Group, Inc. and its consolidated
subsidiaries. This Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and related
notes included in this report.
Business Overview
We are a provider of integrated long-term healthcare services through our skilled nursing
facilities and rehabilitation therapy business. We also provide other related healthcare services,
including assisted living care and hospice care. We focus on providing high quality care to our
patients, and we have a strong reputation for treating patients who require a high level of skilled
nursing care and extensive rehabilitation therapy, whom we refer to as high-acuity patients. As of
June 30, 2007, we owned or leased 64 skilled nursing facilities and 13 assisted living facilities,
together comprising approximately 8,900 licensed beds. We currently own approximately 75% of our
facilities, which are located in California, Texas, Kansas, Missouri and Nevada, and are generally
clustered in large urban or suburban markets. For the six months ended June 30, 2007, our skilled
nursing facilities, including our integrated rehabilitation therapy services at these facilities,
generated approximately 84.5% of our revenue, compared to 85.9% of our revenue for the six months
ended June 30, 2006, with the remainder generated by our other related healthcare services.
We operate our business in two reportable segments: long-term care services, which include the
operation of skilled nursing and assisted living facilities and is the most significant portion of
our business, and ancillary services, which include our rehabilitation therapy and hospice
businesses. The other category includes general and administrative items and eliminations.
On
July 31, 2007, the Company and certain affiliates at Laurel
Healthcare Providers, LLC, entered into definitive agreements,
pursuant to which the Company will acquire substantially all the
assets and assume the operations of several inter-related companies
related to ten skilled nursing facilities and a
hospice company, all of which are located in or around Albuquerque,
New Mexico, for approximately $51.5 million. The acquired
facilities will add 1,180 beds to the Companys operations.
Revenue
Revenue by Service Offering
In our long-term care services segment, we derive the majority of our revenue by providing
skilled nursing care and integrated rehabilitation therapy services to residents in our network of
skilled nursing facilities. In our ancillary services segment, we derive revenue by providing
related healthcare services, including our rehabilitation therapy services provided to third-party
facilities and hospice care.
18
Table of Contents
The following table shows the percentage of our total revenue
generated by each of these segments for the periods presented:
Percentage Total Revenue | Percentage Total Revenue | ||||||||||||||||||
Three Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | ||||||||||||||||||
2007 | 2006 | 2007 | 2006 | ||||||||||||||||
(Unaudited) | (Unaudited) | ||||||||||||||||||
Long-term care services segment: |
|||||||||||||||||||
Skilled nursing facilities |
84.7 | % | 85.7 | % | 84.5 | % | 85.9 | % | |||||||||||
Assisted living facilities |
2.6 | 2.9 | 2.7 | 3.0 | |||||||||||||||
Total long-term care services segment |
87.3 | 88.6 | 87.2 | 88.9 | |||||||||||||||
Ancillary services segment: |
|||||||||||||||||||
Third-party rehabilitation therapy services |
11.4 | 10.5 | 11.5 | 10.3 | |||||||||||||||
Hospice |
1.2 | 0.8 | 1.2 | 0.7 | |||||||||||||||
Total ancillary services segment |
12.6 | 11.3 | 12.7 | 11.0 | |||||||||||||||
Other: |
0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | |||||||||||||||
Total |
100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | |||||||||||
Sources of Revenue
Long-Term Care Services Segment
Skilled Nursing Facilities. Within our skilled nursing facilities, we generate our revenue
from Medicare, Medicaid, managed care providers, insurers, private pay and other sources. We
believe that our skilled mix, which we define as the number of Medicare and managed care patient
days at our skilled nursing facilities divided by the total number of patient days at our skilled
nursing facilities for any given period, is an important indicator of our success in attracting
high-acuity patients because it represents the percentage of our patients who are reimbursed by
Medicare and managed care, for whom we receive higher reimbursement rates. Medicare and managed
care payors typically do not provide reimbursement for custodial care, which is a basic level of
healthcare.
The following table sets forth our Medicare, managed care, private pay/other and Medicaid
patient days for our skilled nursing facilities as a percentage of total patient days for our
skilled nursing facilities and the level of skilled mix for our skilled nursing facilities:
Percentage Skilled Nursing Patient Days | ||||||||||||||||
Three Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2007 | 2006 | 2007 | 2006 | |||||||||||||
Medicare |
18.7 | % | 18.4 | % | 19.1 | 18.7 | % | |||||||||
Managed care |
6.0 | 5.3 | 5.9 | 5.3 | ||||||||||||
Skilled mix |
24.7 | 23.7 | 25.0 | 24.0 | ||||||||||||
Private and other |
16.4 | 16.8 | 16.3 | 16.6 | ||||||||||||
Medicaid |
58.9 | 59.5 | 58.7 | 59.4 | ||||||||||||
Total |
100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | ||||||||
Assisted Living Facilities. Within our assisted living facilities, we generate our revenue
primarily from private pay sources, with a small portion earned from Medicaid or other state
specific programs.
Ancillary Services Segment
Rehabilitation Therapy. As of June 30, 2007, we provided rehabilitation therapy services to a
total of 187 facilities, 64 of which were our facilities and 123 of which were unaffiliated
facilities, compared to 153 facilities, 60 of which were our facilities and 93 of which were
unaffiliated facilities as of June 30, 2006. Rehabilitation therapy revenue derived from servicing
our own facilities is included in our revenue from skilled nursing facilities. Our rehabilitation
therapy business receives payment for services from the
third-party skilled nursing facilities that it serves based on negotiated patient per diem
rates or a negotiated fee schedule based on the type of service rendered.
19
Table of Contents
Hospice. We provide hospice care in Texas and California. We derive substantially all of the
revenue from our hospice business from Medicare reimbursement for hospice services.
Regulatory and Other Governmental Actions Affecting Revenue
Our revenue is derived from services provided to patients in the following payor classes
(dollars in thousands):
Three months ended June 30, | Six months ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2007 | 2006 | 2007 | 2006 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Revenue | Percent of | Revenue | Percent of | Revenue | Percent of | Revenue | Percent of | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dollars | Total | Dollars | Total | Dollars | Total | Dollars | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Medicare |
$ | 56,134 | 37.1 | % | $ | 47,903 | 36.5 | % | $ | 111,421 | 37.6 | % | $ | 94,074 | 36.7 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Medicaid |
45,746 | 30.3 | 41,348 | 31.5 | 88,359 | 29.9 | 81,110 | 31.6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Managed Care |
12,668 | 8.4 | 10,543 | 8.0 | 24,418 | 8.3 | 20,580 | 8.0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Private and Other |
36,543 | 24.2 | 31,377 | 24.0 | 71,548 | 24.2 | 60,593 | 23.7 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 151,091 | 100.0 | % | $ | 131,171 | 100.0 | % | $ | 295,746 | 100.0 | % | $ | 256,357 | 100.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||
We derive a substantial portion of our revenue from the Medicare and Medicaid programs. For
the six months ended June 30, 2007, we derived approximately 37.6% and 29.9% of our total revenue
from the Medicare and Medicaid programs, respectively, and for the six months ended June 30, 2006,
we derived approximately 36.7% and 31.6% of our total revenue from the Medicare and Medicaid
programs, respectively. In addition, our rehabilitation therapy services, for which we receive
payment from private payors, are significantly dependent on Medicare and Medicaid funding, as those
private payors are often reimbursed by these programs.
Medicare. Medicare is an exclusively federal program that primarily provides healthcare
benefits to beneficiaries who are 65 years of age or older. It is a broad program of health
insurance designed to help the nations elderly meet hospital, hospice, home health and other
health care costs. Medicare coverage extends to certain persons under age 65 who qualify as
disabled and those having end-stage renal disease.
Medicare reimburses our skilled nursing facilities under a prospective payment system, or PPS,
for inpatient Medicare Part A covered services. Under the PPS, facilities are paid a predetermined
amount per patient, per day, based on the anticipated costs of treating patients. The amount to be
paid is determined by classifying each patient into a resource utilization group, or RUG, category,
that is based upon each patients acuity level. As of January 1, 2006, the RUG categories were
expanded from 44 to 53, with increased reimbursement rates for treating higher acuity patients. The
new rules also implemented a market basket increase that increased rates by 3.1% for fiscal year
2006. At the same time, Congress terminated certain temporary add on payments that were added in
1999 and 2000 as the nursing home industry came under financial pressure from prior Medicare cuts.
Therefore, while Medicare payments to skilled nursing facilities were reduced by an estimated $1.02
billion because of the expiration of the temporary payment add-ons, this reduction was more than
offset by a $510.0 million increase in payments resulting from the refined classification system
and a $530.0 million increase resulting from updates to the payment rates in connection with the
market basket index. While the federal fiscal year 2007 Medicare skilled nursing facility payment
rates did not decrease payments to skilled nursing facilities, the loss of revenue associated with
future changes in skilled nursing facility payments could, in the future, have an adverse impact on
our financial condition or results of operations.
On February 8, 2006, President Bush signed into law the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005, or DRA,
which is expected to reduce Medicare and Medicaid payments to skilled nursing facilities by $100.0
million over five years (i.e., federal fiscal years 2006 to 2010). Among other things, the DRA
included a reduction in the amount of bad debt reimbursement for skilled nursing facilities.
Medicare reimburses providers for certain unpaid Medicare beneficiary coinsurance and deductibles,
also known as bad debt. Under the
20
Table of Contents
DRAs revisions, for patients who are not full-benefit, dual-eligible individuals, allowable
bad-debt amounts attributable to coinsurance under the Medicare program for a skilled nursing
facility will be reduced to 70%. Allowable bad-debt amounts for patients who are full-benefit,
dual-eligible individuals will continue to be paid at 100%. This reduction took place for Medicare
cost reports beginning on or after October 1, 2005. In addition, under previously enacted federal
law, caps on annual reimbursements for rehabilitation therapy became effective on January 1, 2006.
The DRA directed the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, or CMS, to create a process to
allow exceptions to the therapy caps for certain medically necessary services provided after
January 1, 2006 for patients with certain conditions or multiple complexities whose therapy is
reimbursed under Medicare Part B. The majority of the residents in our skilled nursing facilities
and patients served by our rehabilitation therapy agencies whose therapy is reimbursed under
Medicare Part B have qualified for these exceptions. The Tax Relief and Health Care Act of 2006
extended these exceptions through the end of 2007. Unless further extended, these exceptions will
expire on December 31, 2007.
Also pursuant to DRA directives, CMS is required to establish a post-acute care payment reform
demonstration by January 1, 2008. The goal of the initiative is to standardize patient assessment
information from post-acute care settings, which includes skilled nursing facilities, long-term
care hospitals, inpatient rehabilitation facilities and home health agencies, and to use this data
to guide future payment policies in the Medicare program. The project will provide standardized
information on patient health and functional status independent of post-acute care site of care and
will examine resources and outcomes associated with treatment in each type of setting. The project
is being completed in two phases: Phase I, scheduled to be completed by December 2007, includes
developing a patient assessment tool and resource use tools, testing them in one market area, and
selecting markets for further testing. Phase II, scheduled to begin in early 2008 and continuing
through 2009, involves expanding the demonstration to 10 market areas. Although the agency is
exploring the possibility of site-neutral payments for post-acute care, it remains unclear at this
time how information from the project would be employed by CMS to guide future changes to payment
policies for post-acute care, or how the change would impact reimbursement rates for skilled
nursing facilities.
On February 5, 2007, the Bush Administration released its fiscal year 2008 budget proposal,
with legislative and administrative proposals that would reduce Medicare spending by $5.3 billion
in fiscal year 2008 and $75.9 billion over five years. The budget would, among other things, freeze
payments in fiscal year 2008 to skilled nursing facilities and reduce payment updates for hospice
services. Of these proposals, $4.3 billion for 2008 and $65.6 billion over five years would require
legislation to be implemented. Both the DRA and the 2008 budget proposal may result in reduced
Medicare funding for skilled nursing facilities and other providers. For 2007, as part of a market
basket adjustment implemented for increased cost of living, Medicare payments to skilled nursing
facilities increase by an average of 3.1% over prior year rates.
On July 31, 2007, CMS released its final rule on the fiscal year 2008 per diem payment rates
for skilled nursing facilities. Under the final rule, CMS revises and rebases the skilled nursing
facility market basket, resulting in a 3.3% market basket increase factor. Using this increase
factor, the final rule increases aggregate payments to skilled nursing facilities nationwide by
approximately $690 million. While CMS has calculated a market basket increase of 3.3% in its final
rule, the Presidents budget recommendation includes a proposal for a zero percent update to the
skilled nursing facility market basket. To become effective, the Presidents budget proposal would
require legislation enacted by Congress. On August 1, 2007, the U.S. House of Representatives passed a bill that included
a provision to eliminate the 3.3% market basket increase for 2008. The U.S. Senate
did not include a similar provision in its companion bill. At this time, it is uncertain whether the legislation will be approved.
Historically, adjustments to the reimbursement rates under Medicare have had a significant
effect on our revenue. For a discussion of historic adjustments and recent changes to the Medicare
program and related reimbursement rates, see Business Sources of Reimbursement in our
Registration Statement filed with the SEC and Risk Factors Risks Related to Our Business and
Industry Reductions in Medicare reimbursement rates or changes in the rules governing the
Medicare program could have a material adverse effect on our revenue, financial condition and
results of operations in Part II, Item 1A in this quarterly report.
21
Table of Contents
Medicaid. Medicaid is a state administered medical assistance program for the indigent,
operated by the individual states with the financial participation of the federal government. Each
state has relatively broad discretion in establishing its Medicaid reimbursement formulas and
coverage of service, which must be approved by the federal government in accordance with federal
guidelines. All states in which we operate cover long-term care services for individuals who are
Medicaid eligible and qualify for institutional care. Medicaid payments are made directly to
providers, who must accept the Medicaid reimbursement level as payment in full for services
rendered. Rapidly increasing Medicaid spending, combined with slow state revenue growth, has led
many states to institute measures aimed at controlling spending growth. Given that Medicaid outlays
are a significant component of state budgets, we expect continuing cost containment pressures on
Medicaid outlays for skilled nursing facilities in the states in which we operate. In addition, the
DRA limited the circumstances under which an individual may become financially eligible for
Medicaid and nursing home services paid for by Medicaid. The following summarizes the Medicaid
regime in the principal states in which we operate.
| California. In 2005, under State Assembly Bill 1629, California Medicaid, known as Medi-Cal, switched from a prospective payment system to a prospective cost-based system for free standing nursing facilities that is facility-specific-based upon the cost of providing care at that facility. State Assembly Bill 1629 included both a rate increase, as well as a quality assurance fee that is a provider tax. The provider tax is a mechanism for states to obtain additional federal funding for the states Medicaid program. State Assembly Bill 1629 is scheduled to expire, with its prospective cost-based system and quality assurance fee becoming inoperative, on July 31, 2008, unless a later enacted statute extends this date. | ||
| Texas. Texas has a prospective cost-based system that is facility specific based upon patient acuity mix for that facility. | ||
| Kansas. The Kansas Medicaid reimbursement system is prospective, cost based and is case mix adjusted for resident activity levels. | ||
| Missouri. The Missouri Medicaid reimbursement system is prospective and cost based. The facility specific rate is composed of five cost components: patient care; ancillary; administration; capital; and working capital. | ||
| Nevada. Nevadas reimbursement system is prospective cost based, adjusted for patient acuity mix and designed to cover all costs except those currently associated with property, return on equity and certain ancillaries. Property cost is reimbursed at a prospective rate for each facility. |
The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services has established a Medicaid advisory
commission charged with recommending ways in which Congress can restructure the program. The
commission issued its report on December 29, 2006. The commissions report included several
recommendations that involved giving states greater discretion in the determination of eligibility,
formulation of benefit packages, financing, and tying payment for services to quality measures. The
commission also recommended to expand home and community-based care for seniors and the disabled.
Managed Care. Our managed care patients consist of individuals who are insured by a
third-party entity, typically called a senior HMO plan, or are Medicare beneficiaries who assign
their Medicare benefits to a senior HMO plan.
Private Pay and Other. Private pay and other sources consist primarily of individuals or
parties who directly pay for their services or are beneficiaries of the Department of Veterans
Affairs or hospice beneficiaries not enrolled in Medicare.
Critical Accounting Policies Update
There have been no significant changes during the three- and six-month periods ended June 30,
2007 to the items that we disclosed as our critical accounting policies and estimates in our
discussion and analysis
of financial condition and results of operations in our Registration Statement on Form S-1
filed with the SEC.
22
Table of Contents
Results of Operations
The following table sets forth details of our revenue and earnings as a percentage of total
revenue for the periods indicated:
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2007 | 2006 | 2007 | 2006 | |||||||||||||
(Unaudited) | (Unaudited) | |||||||||||||||
Revenue |
100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | ||||||||
Expenses: |
||||||||||||||||
Cost of services (exclusive of rent cost of sales
and depreciation and amortization shown below) |
75.1 | 75.0 | 74.6 | 74.4 | ||||||||||||
Rent cost of sales |
1.7 | 1.8 | 1.8 | 1.9 | ||||||||||||
General and administrative |
6.9 | 7.1 | 7.4 | 7.3 | ||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
2.8 | 2.7 | 2.8 | 2.8 | ||||||||||||
86.5 | 86.6 | 86.6 | 86.4 | |||||||||||||
Other income (expenses): |
||||||||||||||||
Interest expense |
(10.5 | ) | (8.9 | ) | (9.4 | ) | (8.9 | ) | ||||||||
Premium on redemption of debt and write-off
of related deferred financing costs |
(5.1 | ) | | (2.6 | ) | | ||||||||||
Interest income and other |
0.5 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.2 | ||||||||||||
Equity in earnings of joint venture |
0.2 | 0.4 | 0.3 | 0.3 | ||||||||||||
Change in fair value of interest rate hedge |
| 0.1 | | | ||||||||||||
Total other income (expenses), net |
(14.9 | ) | (8.2 | ) | (11.4 | ) | (8.4 | ) | ||||||||
(Loss) income before (benefit) provision for income taxes |
(1.4 | ) | 5.2 | 2.0 | 5.2 | |||||||||||
(Benefit) provision for income taxes |
(0.4 | ) | 2.3 | 1.0 | 2.2 | |||||||||||
Net (loss) income |
(1.0 | )% | 2.9 | % | 1.0 | % | 3.0 | % | ||||||||
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2007 | 2006 | 2007 | 2006 | |||||||||||||
(Unaudited) | (Unaudited) | |||||||||||||||
Reconciliation of net (loss) income to EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA
(in thousands): |
||||||||||||||||
Net (loss) income |
$ | (1,553 | ) | $ | 3,715 | $ | 3,101 | $ | 7,817 | |||||||
Interest expense, net of interest income and other |
11,242 | 11,370 | 23,007 | 22,211 | ||||||||||||
(Benefit) provision for income taxes |
(556 | ) | 3,071 | 2,822 | 5,672 | |||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization expense |
4,239 | 3,573 | 8,200 | 7,247 | ||||||||||||
EBITDA |
13,372 | 21,729 | 37,130 | 42,947 | ||||||||||||
Change in fair value of interest rate hedge |
| (77 | ) | 33 | (56 | ) | ||||||||||
Write-off of deferred financing costs related to redemption of debt |
3,948 | | 3,948 | | ||||||||||||
Premium on redemption of debt |
7,700 | | 7,700 | | ||||||||||||
Adjusted EBITDA |
$ | 25,020 | $ | 21,652 | $ | 48,811 | $ | 42,891 | ||||||||
23
Table of Contents
We believe that the presentation of EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA provide useful
information to investors regarding our operational performance because they enhance an investors
overall understanding of the financial performance and prospects for the future of our core
business activities. Specifically, we believe that a report of EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA provide
consistency in our financial reporting and provides a basis for the comparison of results of core
business operations between our current, past and future periods. EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA are
two of the primary indicators management uses for planning and forecasting in future periods,
including trending and analyzing the core operating performance of our business from
period-to-period without the effect of U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, or GAAP,
expenses, revenues and gains (losses) that are unrelated to the day-to-day performance of our
business. We also use EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA to benchmark the performance of our business
against expected results, to analyze year-over-year trends, as described below, and to compare our
operating performance to that of our competitors.
Management uses both EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA to assess the performance of our core business
operations, to prepare operating budgets and to measure our performance against those budgets on an
administrative services, segment and a facility by facility level. We typically use Adjusted EBITDA
for these purposes at the administrative services level (because the adjustments to EBITDA are not
generally allocable to any individual business unit) and we typically use EBITDA to compare the
operating performance of each skilled nursing and assisted living facility, as well as to assess
the performance of our operating segments: long term care services, which includes the operation of
our skilled nursing and assisted living facilities; and ancillary services, which includes our
rehabilitation therapy and hospice businesses. EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA are useful in this regard
because they do not include such costs as interest expense, income taxes, depreciation and
amortization expense and special charges, which may vary from business unit to business unit and
period to period depending upon various factors, including the method used to finance the business,
the amount of debt that we have determined to incur, whether a facility is owned or leased, the
date of acquisition of a facility or business, the original purchase price of a facility or
business unit or the tax law of the state in which a business unit operates. These types of charges
are dependent on factors unrelated to our underlying business. As a result, we believe that the use
of EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA provide a meaningful and consistent comparison of our underlying
business between periods by eliminating certain items required by GAAP which have little or no
significance in our day-to-day operations.
We also make capital allocations to each of our facilities based on expected EBITDA returns
and establish compensation programs and bonuses for our executive management and facility level
employees that are based upon the achievement of pre-established EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA
targets.
We also use Adjusted EBITDA to determine compliance with our debt covenants and assess our
ability to borrow additional funds to finance or expand our operations. The credit agreement
governing our first lien term loan uses a measure substantially similar to Adjusted EBITDA as the
basis for determining compliance with our financial covenants, specifically our minimum interest
coverage ratio and our maximum total leverage ratio, and for determining the interest rate of our
first lien term loan. The indenture governing our 11.0% senior subordinated notes also uses a
substantially similar measurement for determining the amount of additional debt we may incur. For
example, both our credit facility and the indenture for our 11.0% senior subordinated notes include
adjustments for (i) gain or losses on the sale of assets, (ii) the write-off of deferred financing
costs of redeemed debt; (iii) reorganization expenses; and (iv) fees and expenses related to the
Transactions. Our non-compliance with these financial covenants could lead to acceleration of
amounts under our credit facility. In addition, if we cannot satisfy certain financial covenants
under the indenture for our 11.0% senior subordinated notes, we cannot engage in specified
activities, such as incurring additional indebtedness or making certain payments. We are currently
in compliance with our debt covenants.
Despite the importance of these measures in analyzing our underlying business, maintaining our
financial requirements, designing incentive compensation and for our goal setting both on an
aggregate and facility level basis, EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA are non-GAAP financial measures that
have no standardized meaning defined by GAAP. Therefore, our EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA measures
have
24
Table of Contents
limitations as analytical tools, and they should not be considered in isolation, or as a
substitute for analysis of our results as reported under GAAP. Some of these limitations are:
| they do not reflect our cash expenditures, or future requirements, for capital expenditures or contractual commitments; | |
| they do not reflect changes in, or cash requirements for, our working capital needs; | |
| they do not reflect the interest expense, or the cash requirements necessary to service interest or principal payments, on our debt; | |
| they do not reflect any income tax payments we may be required to make; | |
| although depreciation and amortization are non-cash charges, the assets being depreciated and amortized will often have to be replaced in the future, and EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA do not reflect any cash requirements for such replacements; | |
| they are not adjusted for all non-cash income or expense items that are reflected in our consolidated statements of cash flows; | |
| they do not reflect the impact on net income of charges resulting from certain matters we consider not to be indicative of our on-going operations; and | |
| other companies in our industry may calculate these measures differently than we do, which may limit their usefulness as comparative measures. |
We compensate for these limitations by using them only to supplement both net income on a
basis prepared in conformance with GAAP in order to provide a more complete understanding of the
factors and trends affecting our business. We strongly encourage investors to consider net income
(loss) determined under GAAP as compared to EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA, and to perform their own
analysis, as appropriate.
25
Table of Contents
Three Months Ended June 30, 2007 Compared to Three Months Ended June 30, 2006
Revenue. Revenue increased $19.9 million, or 15.2%, to $151.1 million for the three months
ended June 30, 2007 from $131.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2006.
Revenue in our long-term care services segment, comprising skilled nursing and assisted living
facilities, increased $15.6 million, or 13.4%, to $131.9 million in the three months ended June 30,
2007 from $116.3 million in the three months ended June 30, 2006. The increase in the long-term
care services segment revenue resulted from a $15.4 million, or 13.7%, increase in skilled nursing
facilities revenue, and a $0.2 million, or 5.3%, increase in assisted living facilities revenue. Of
the increase in skilled nursing facilities revenue, $8.7 million resulted from increased
reimbursement rates from Medicare, Medicaid and managed care, as well as a higher patient acuity
mix and $6.7 million resulted from increased occupancy. Our average daily Medicare rate increased
8.2% to $488 in the three months ended June 30, 2007 from $451 in the three months ended June 30,
2006 as a result of market increases provided under the Medicare program, as well as a shift to
higher-acuity Medicare patients. Our average daily Medicaid rate increased 5.7% to $129 in the
three months ended June 30, 2007 from $122 in the three months ended June 30, 2006, primarily due
to increased Medicaid rates in California and Texas. Our private pay and other rates decreased by
approximately 6.5% in the three months ended June 30, 2007 as compared to the three months ended
June 30, 2006. Our managed care rates increased by approximately 0.4% in the three months ended
June 30, 2007 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2006. Our skilled mix increased to 24.7%
in the three months ended June 30, 2007 from 23.7% for the three months ended June 30, 2006 as we
continued marketing our capabilities to referral sources to attract high-acuity patients to our
facilities and recent regulatory changes limited the type of patient that can be admitted to
certain higher-cost post-acute care facilities. Our average daily number of patients increased 371,
or 6.0%, to 6,597 in the three months ended June 30, 2007 from 6,226 in the three months ended June
30, 2006, primarily due to our acquisition of one healthcare facility in Nevada on June 16, 2006,
one healthcare facility in Missouri on December 15, 2006, and three healthcare facilities in
Missouri on April 1, 2007.
Revenue from external customers in our ancillary services segment increased $4.3 million, or
29.2%, to $19.1 million in the three months ended June 30, 2007, compared to $14.8 million in the
three months ended June 30, 2006. The increase in our ancillary services segment revenue resulted
from a $3.6 million, or 26.3%, increase in our rehabilitation therapy services revenue and a $0.7
million, or 63.6%, increase in our hospice business revenue. Of the $3.6 million increase in
rehabilitation therapy services revenue, $3.0 million resulted from an increase in the number of
rehabilitation therapy contracts with third-party facilities, with the remaining $0.6 million
resulting primarily from increased services under existing third-party contracts. Increased
services under existing third-party contracts primarily resulted from increases in volume at the
facilities and, to a lesser extent, the timing of contract execution during the periods, with some
contracts entered into during the second quarter of 2006 being in effect for the full second
quarter of 2007.
Cost of Services Expenses. Our cost of services expenses increased $15.1 million, or 15.3%,
to $113.5 million, or 75.1% of revenue, in the three months ended June 30, 2007 from $98.4 million,
or 75.0% of revenue, in the three months ended June 30, 2006.
Cost of services expenses for our long-term care services segment increased $10.7 million, or
11.7%, to $101.8 million, or 77.2% of revenue, in the three months ended June 30, 2007 from $91.1
million, or 78.4% of revenue, in the three months ended June 30, 2006.
The increase in long-term care services segment cost of services expenses resulted from a
$10.4 million, or 11.7%, increase in cost of services expenses at our skilled nursing facilities
and a $0.3 million, or 12.5%, increase in cost of services expenses at our assisted living
facilities.
Of the increase in cost of services expenses at our skilled nursing facilities, $5.3 million
resulted from operating costs per patient day increasing $8 to $165 in the three months ended June
30, 2007 from $157 in the three months ended June 30, 2006 and $5.1 million resulted from increased
occupancy. The
26
Table of Contents
$5.3 million increase in operating costs as a result of increased operating costs per patient
day primarily resulted from increased labor costs of $2.4 million, due to an average hourly rate
increase of 3.9% and increased staffing, primarily in the nursing area, to respond to increased
acuity levels, an increase in ancillary expenses, such as pharmacy and therapy costs, due to an
increase in the mix of higher acuity patients of $2.6 million and a net increase in other expenses,
such as supplies, food, taxes and licenses, insurance and utilities of $0.3 million, due to
increased purchasing costs. The increase in occupancy resulted in increased operating costs of $5.1
million, in which the average daily number of patients increased by 371 to 6,597 in the three
months ended June 30, 2007 from 6,226 in the three months ended June 30, 2006, due to our 2006
acquisitions of four healthcare facilities in Missouri and one healthcare facility in Nevada, as
well as three Missouri healthcare facilities in April 2007.
Cost of services expenses in our ancillary services segment, prior to any intercompany
eliminations, increased $6.3 million, or 31.0%, to $26.6 million, or 78.4% of revenue, from both
internal and external customers, in the three months ended June 30, 2007 from $20.3 million, or
73.7% of revenue, from both internal and external customers, in the three months ended June 30,
2006. The increase in ancillary services segment cost of services expenses resulted from a $5.9
million, or 30.7%, increase in cost of services expenses related to our rehabilitation therapy
services business to $25.1 million, or 78.0% of revenue, from both internal and external customers,
in the three months ended June 30, 2007 from $19.2 million, or 72.7% of revenue, from both internal
and external customers, in the three months ended June 30, 2006, and a $0.4 million, or 36.4%,
increase in cost of services expenses related to our hospice business. The increase in cost of
services expenses in our rehabilitation therapy services business primarily resulted from the
increased activity under third-party rehabilitation therapy contracts discussed above. The increase
in hospice operating costs related to the increase in hospice revenue of 63.6%.
Rent Cost of Sales. Rent cost of sales increased by $0.2 million, or 9.8%, to $2.5 million in
the three months ended June 30, 2007 from $2.3 million in the three months ended June 30, 2006.
This increase was primarily caused by the June 2006 acquisition of a leased healthcare facility in
Nevada, partially offset by the February 2007 acquisition of a previously leased facility.
General and Administrative Services Expenses. Our general and administrative services
expenses increased $1.1 million, or 11.9%, to $10.4 million, or 6.9% of revenue, in the three
months ended June 30, 2007 from $9.3 million, or 7.1% of revenue, in the three months ended June
30, 2006. The increase in our general and administrative expenses resulted from increased
professional fees of $1.0 million in 2007, primarily in the areas of accounting and audit services
and legal fees incurred in preparation for our initial public offering in May 2007, as well as
professional tax services and payroll services. Other expenses increased $0.1 million.
Depreciation and Amortization. Depreciation and amortization increased by $0.6 million, or
18.6%, to $4.2 million in the three months ended June 30, 2007 from $3.6 million in the three
months ended June 30, 2006. This increase primarily resulted from increased depreciation related to
our acquisitions of one healthcare facility in Nevada in June 2006, one healthcare facility in
Missouri in December 2006 and three healthcare facilities in Missouri in April 2007.
Interest Expense. Interest expense increased by $0.3 million, or 2.7%, to $11.9 million in the
three months ended June 30, 2007 from $11.6 million in the three months ended June 30, 2006. The
increase in our interest expense was primarily due to the average debt for the three months ended
June 30, 2007 increasing by $16.6 million to $483.0 million from $466.4 million for the three
months ended June 30, 2006. The average interest rate on our debt decreased to 9.0% for the three
months ended June 30, 2007 from 9.2% for the same period in 2006. Debt increased primarily as a
result of borrowings made to fund acquisitions, offset by the use of IPO proceeds to redeem $70.0
million of our 11.0% senior subordinated notes and to pay down $36.0 million of our revolving
credit facility. We incurred $0.3 million of penalty interest on our 11.0% senior subordinated
notes as a result of the notes not being publicly registered until May 2007.
27
Table of Contents
Premium on Redemption of Debt and Write-off of Related Deferred Financing Costs. Premium on
redemption of debt and write-off of related deferred financing costs of extinguished debt was $11.6
million
in the three months ended June 30, 2007, with no comparable amount in the year ago period. In
June 2007, we redeemed $70.0 million of our 11.0% senior subordinated notes before their scheduled
maturities. These notes had an interest rate of 11.0% and a maturity date of 2014. We recorded a
redemption premium of $7.7 million, as well as write-offs of $3.6 million of unamortized debt costs
and $0.3 of original issue discount associated with this redemption of debt.
Interest Income and Other. Interest income and other increased by $0.5 million, or 182.6%, to
$0.7 million in the three months ended June 30, 2007 from $0.2 million in the three months ended
June 30, 2006. This increase was primarily due to interest income earned on IPO proceeds which were held for one month until the $70.0 million of 11.0% senior subordinated notes were redeemed.
(Benefit from) Provision for Income Taxes. Benefit from income taxes for the three months
ended June 30, 2007 was $0.6 million, or 26.4% of loss before benefit from income taxes. The tax
benefit rate of 26.4% consisted of our effective tax rate, offset by the recording of interest
expense on our tax contingency reserves incurred for the three months ended June 30, 2007 in
accordance with FIN 48. Provision for income taxes for the three months ended June 30, 2006 was
$3.1 million, or 45.3% of income before provision for income taxes.
EBITDA. EBITDA decreased by $8.3 million, or 38.5%, to $13.4 million in the three months
ended June 30, 2007 from $21.7 million in the three months ended June 30, 2006. The $8.3 million
decrease was primarily related to the $19.9 million increase in revenue discussed above, offset by
the $15.1 million increase in cost of services expenses discussed above, the $0.2 million increase
in rent cost of sales discussed above, the $1.1 million increase in general and administrative
services expenses discussed above, the $11.6 million charges related to the premium on early
retirement of debt and write-off of deferred financing costs of extinguished debt discussed above,
as well as a $0.2 million increase in other expense items.
EBITDA for our long-term care services segment increased by $3.9 million, or 23.0%, to $20.7
million in the three months ended June 30, 2007 from $16.8 million in the three months ended June
30, 2006. The $3.9 million increase was primarily related to the $15.6 million increase in revenue
in our long-term care services segment discussed above, offset by the $10.7 million increase in
cost of services in our long-term care services segment expenses discussed above and an increase in
rent cost of sales of $1.1 million, primarily due to additional facilities.
EBITDA for our ancillary services segment increased by $0.2 million, or 3.8%, to $4.9 million
in the three months ended June 30, 2007 from $4.7 million in the three months ended June 30, 2006.
The $0.2 million increase was primarily related to the $4.3 million increase in our ancillary
services segment revenue discussed above, as well as a $2.2 million increase in intercompany
revenue, primarily related to an increase in the volume of rehabilitation therapy services provided
to our skilled nursing facilities, offset by the $6.3 million increase in cost of services in our
ancillary services segment expenses discussed above.
Net (Loss) Income. Net loss for the three months ended June 30, 2007 was $1.6 million,
compared to net income of $3.7 million for the three months ended June 30, 2006, a decrease of $5.3
million. The $5.3 million decrease was primarily related to the $3.7 million decrease in income
taxes discussed above, as well as an increase in interest income and other of $0.5 million
discusses above, offset by the $0.3 million increase in interest expense discussed above, the $11.6
million premium on the redemption of debt and write-off of deferred financing costs of extinguished
debt discussed above, the $8.3 million decrease in EBITDA discussed above, and the increase in
depreciation and amortization of $0.6 million discussed above. The most material factors that
contributed to the decrease in net income in the three months ended June 30, 2007 as compared to
the three months ended June 30, 2006 were the premium paid on the redemption of debt and write-off
of deferred financing costs.
Six Months Ended June 30, 2007 Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2006
Revenue. Revenue increased $39.3 million, or 15.4%, to $295.7 million for the six months
ended June 30, 2007 from $256.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006.
28
Table of Contents
Revenue in our long-term care services segment, comprised of skilled nursing and assisted
living facilities, increased $29.9 million, or 13.1%, to $257.9 million in the six months ended
June 30, 2007 from $228.0 million in the six months ended June 30, 2006. The increase in long-term
care services segment revenue resulted from a $29.6 million, or 13.4%, increase in skilled nursing
facilities revenue, and a $0.3 million, or 3.9%, increase in assisted living facilities revenue. Of
the increase in skilled nursing facilities revenue, $17.0 million resulted from increased
reimbursement rates from Medicare, Medicaid, managed care and private pay sources, as well as a
higher patient acuity mix and $12.6 million resulted from increased occupancy. Our average daily
Medicare rate increased 8.5% to $484 in the six months ended June 30, 2007 from $446 in the six
months ended June 30, 2006 as a result of market increases provided under the Medicare program, as
well as a shift to higher-acuity Medicare patients. Our average daily Medicaid rate increased 4.1%
to $127 in the six months ended June 30, 2007 from $122 in the six months ended June 30, 2006,
primarily due to increased Medicaid rates in California and Texas. Our private pay and other rates
increased by approximately 6.0% in the six months ended June 30, 2007 as compared to the six months
ended June 30, 2006. Our managed care rates increased by approximately 1.4% in the six months ended
June 30, 2007 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2006. Our skilled mix increased to 25.0% in
the six months ended June 30, 2007 from 24.0% for the six months ended June 30, 2006 as we
continued marketing our capabilities to referral sources to attract high-acuity patients to our
facilities and recent regulatory changes limited the type of patient that can be admitted to
certain higher-cost post-acute care facilities. Our average daily number of patients increased 352,
or 5.7%, to 6,493 in the six months ended June 30, 2007 from 6,141 in the six months ended June 30,
2006 due to our March 2006 acquisitions of three healthcare facilities in Missouri, our June 2006
acquisition of one healthcare facility in Nevada, our December 2006 acquisition of one healthcare
facility in Missouri and our April 2007 acquisition of three healthcare facilities in Missouri.
Revenue from external customers in our ancillary services segment increased $9.3 million, or
33.1%, to $37.6 million in the six months ended June 30, 2007, compared to $28.3 million in the six
months ended June 30, 2006. The increase in our ancillary services segment revenue resulted from a
$7.8 million, or 29.5%, increase in our rehabilitation therapy services revenue and a $1.5 million,
or 78.9%, increase in our hospice business revenue. Of the $7.8 million increase in rehabilitation
therapy services revenue, $5.3 million resulted from an increase in the number of rehabilitation
therapy contracts with third-party facilities, with the remaining $2.5 million resulting primarily
from increased services under existing third-party contracts. Increased services under existing
third-party contracts primarily resulted from increases in volume at the facilities and, to a
lesser extent, the timing of contract execution during the periods, with some contracts entered
into during the first half of 2006 being in effect for the full first half of 2007.
Cost of Services Expenses. Our cost of services expenses increased $30.0 million, or 15.7%,
to $220.7 million, or 74.6% of revenue, in the six months ended June 30, 2007 from $190.7 million,
or 74.4% of revenue, in the six months ended June 30, 2006.
Cost of services expenses for our long-term care services segment increased $21.9 million, or
12.4% to $198.2 million, or 76.9% of revenue, in the six months ended June 30, 2007 from $176.3
million, or 77.3% of revenue, in the six months ended June 30, 2006.
The increase in long-term care services segment cost of services expenses resulted from a
$21.6 million, or 12.6%, increase in cost of services expenses at our skilled nursing facilities
and a $0.3 million, or 6.0%, increase in cost of services expenses at our assisted living
facilities.
Of the increase in cost of services expenses at our skilled nursing facilities, $11.2 million
resulted from operating costs per patient day increasing $10 to $164 in the six months ended June
30, 2007 from $154 in the six months ended June 30, 2006 and $10.4 million resulted from increased
occupancy. The $11.2 million increase in operating costs as a result of increased operating costs
per patient day primarily resulted from increased labor costs of $4.7 million, due to an average
hourly rate increase of 4.3% and increased staffing, primarily in the nursing area, to respond to
increased acuity levels, an increase in ancillary expenses, such as pharmacy and therapy costs due
to an increase in the mix of higher acuity patients of $5.2 million and net increases in other
expenses, such as supplies, food, taxes and licenses, insurance and
29
Table of Contents
utilities of $1.3 million, due to increased purchasing costs. The increase in occupancy
resulted in increased operating costs of $10.4 million, in which the average daily number of
patients increased by 352 to 6,493 in the six months ended June 30, 2007 from 6,141 in the six
months ended June 30, 2006, due to our 2006 acquisitions of four healthcare facilities in Missouri
and one healthcare facility in Nevada, as well as three Missouri healthcare facilities in April
2007.
Cost of services expenses in our ancillary services segment, prior to any intercompany
eliminations, increased $11.9 million, or 29.8%, to $51.8 million, or 77.4% of revenue, from both
internal and external customers, in the six months ended June 30, 2007 from $39.9 million, or 75.6%
of revenue, from both internal and external customers, in the six months ended June 30, 2006. The
increase in ancillary services segment cost of services expenses resulted from a $10.8 million, or
28.4%, increase in cost of services expenses related to our rehabilitation therapy services
business to $48.8 million, or 76.8% of revenue, from both internal and external customers, in the
six months ended June 30, 2007 from $38.0 million, or 74.6% of revenue, from both internal and
external customers, in the six months ended June 30, 2006, and a $1.1 million, or 57.9%, increase
in cost of services expenses related to our hospice business. The increase in cost of services
expenses in our rehabilitation therapy services business primarily resulted from the increased
activity under third-party rehabilitation therapy contracts discussed above. The increase in
hospice operating costs related to the increase in hospice revenue of 78.9%.
Rent Cost of Sales. Rent cost of sales increased by $0.4 million, or 9.8%, to $5.2 million in
the six months ended June 30, 2007 from $4.8 million in the six months ended June 30, 2006. This
increase was primarily caused by the June 2006 acquisition of a leased healthcare facility in
Nevada, partially offset by the February 2007 acquisition of a previously leased facility.
General and Administrative Services Expenses. Our general and administrative services
expenses increased $3.0 million, or 16.1%, to $21.9 million, or 7.4% of revenue, in the six months
ended June 30, 2007 from $18.9 million, or 7.3% of revenue, in the six months ended June 30, 2006.
The increase in our general and administrative expenses resulted from increased compensation and
benefits of $1.3 million as we added administrative service personnel. Professional fees also
increased $1.9 million in 2007, primarily in the areas of accounting and audit services and legal
fees incurred in preparation for becoming a public reporting company. Other expenses decreased $0.2
million.
Depreciation and Amortization. Depreciation and amortization increased by $1.0 million, or
13.2%, to $8.2 million in the six months ended June 30, 2007 from $7.2 million in the six months
ended June 30, 2006. This increase primarily resulted from increased depreciation related to our
March and December 2006 acquisitions of four healthcare facilities in Missouri, one healthcare
facility in Nevada in June 2006 and three healthcare facilities in Missouri in April 2007.
Interest Expense. Interest expense increased by $1.2 million, or 4.9%, to $24.0 million in the
six months ended June 30, 2007 from $22.8 million in the six months ended June 30, 2006. The
increase in our interest expense was primarily due to an increase in average debt for the six
months ended June 30, 2007 of $14.0 million to $481.5 million from $467.5 million for the six
months ended June 30, 2006. The average interest rate on our debt increased to 9.1% for the six
months ended June 30, 2007 from 9.0% for the same period in 2006. Debt increased primarily as a
result of borrowings made to fund acquisitions, offset by the use of IPO proceeds to redeem $70.0
million of our 11.0% senior subordinated notes and to pay down $36.0 million of our revolving
credit facility. We incurred $0.6 million of penalty interest on our 11.0% senior subordinated
notes as a result of the notes not being publicly registered until May 2007.
Premium on Redemption of Debt and Write-off of Related Deferred Financing Costs. Premium on
redemption of debt and write-off of related deferred financing costs was $11.6 million in the six
months ended June 30, 2007, with no comparable amount in the year ago period. In June 2007, we
redeemed $70.0 million of our 11.0% senior subordinated notes before their scheduled maturities.
These notes had an interest rate of 11.0% and a maturity date of 2014. We recorded a redemption
premium of $7.7 million, as well as write-offs of $3.6 million of unamortized debt costs and $0.3
of original issue discount associated with this redemption of debt.
30
Table of Contents
Interest Income and Other. Interest income and other increased by $0.4 million, or 61.0%, to
$1.0 million in the six months ended June 30, 2007 from $0.6 million in the six months ended June
30, 2006. This increase was primarily due to interest income earned on IPO proceeds which were held for one month until the $70.0 million of 11.0% senior subordinated notes were redeemed.
Provision for Income Taxes. Provision for income taxes for the six months ended June 30, 2007
was $2.8 million, or 47.6% of income before income tax, a decrease of $2.9 million from provision
for income taxes of $5.7 million, or 42.0% of income before income tax, for the six months ended
June 30, 2006. The increase in our tax rate was primarily the result of recording interest expense
on our tax contingency reserves incurred for the six months ended June 30, 2007 in accordance with
FIN 48.
EBITDA. EBITDA decreased by $5.8 million, or 13.5%, to $37.1 million in the six months ended
June 30, 2007 from $42.9 million in the six months ended June 30, 2006. The $5.8 million decrease
was primarily related to the $39.3 million increase in revenue discussed above, offset by the $30.0
million increase in cost of services expenses discussed above, the $0.4 million increase in rent
cost of sales discussed above, the $3.0 million increase in general and administrative services
expenses discussed above, and the $11.6 million charges related to the premium on early retirement
of debt and write-off of deferred financing costs of extinguished debt discussed above.
EBITDA for our long-term care services segment increased by $6.1 million, or 17.2%, to $41.4
million in the six months ended June 30, 2007 from $35.3 million in the six months ended June 30,
2006. The $6.1 million increase was primarily related to the $29.9 million increase in revenue in
our long-term care services segment discussed above, offset by the $21.9 million increase in cost
of services in our long-term care services segment expenses discussed above, and an increase in
rent cost of sales of $1.9 million, primarily due to additional facilities.
EBITDA for our ancillary services segment increased by $1.9 million, or 22.8% to $10.0 million
in the six months ended June 30, 2007 from $8.1 million in the six months ended June 30, 2006. The
$1.9 million increase was primarily related to the $9.3 million increase in our ancillary services
segment revenue discussed above, as well as a $4.8 million increase in intercompany revenue,
primarily related to an increase in the volume of rehabilitation therapy services provided to our
skilled nursing facilities, offset by the $11.9 million increase in cost of services in our
ancillary services segment expenses discussed above, and a $0.5 million increase in general and
administrative services expenses.
Net Income. Net income decreased by approximately $4.7 million, or 60.3%, to $3.1 million for
the six months ended June 30, 2007 from $7.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006. The
$4.7 million decrease was primarily related to the $2.9 million decrease in income taxes discussed
above, as well as the increase in interest income and other of $0.4 million discussed above, offset
by the $1.2 million increase in interest expense discussed above, the $11.6 million premium on the
redemption of debt and write-off of related deferred financing costs discussed above, the $5.8
million decrease in EBITDA discussed above, and the increase in depreciation and amortization of
$1.0 million discussed above. The most material factors that contributed to the decrease in net
income in the six months ended June 30, 2007 as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2006 were
the premium paid on the redemption of debt and write-off of related deferred financing costs.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Six Months Ended June 30, 2007 Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2006
Our principal sources of liquidity are cash generated by operating activities and borrowings
under our credit facility.
Cash provided by operating activities primarily consists of net income adjusted for certain
non-cash items including write-off of deferred financing costs and extinguishment of debt,
depreciation, amortization, stock-based compensation as well as the effect of changes in working capital
and other activities. Cash provided by operating activities in the six months ended June 30, 2007
was $7.7 million and consisted of net income of $3.1 million, adjustments for non-cash items of
$21.9 million and $17.3 million used by
31
Table of Contents
working capital and other activities. Working capital and other activities primarily
consisted of an increase in accounts receivable of $6.0 million, a $16.5 million reduction in
accounts payable and accrued liabilities and an $11.3 million increase in other long-term
liabilities. The reduction in accounts payable and accrued liabilities and the increase in other
long-term liabilities was primarily the result of an $11.1 million reclassification from accrued
income tax contingencies to other long-term liabilities as a result of our adoption of the
provisions of FIN No. 48.
Cash provided by operating activities in the six months ended June 30, 2006 was $20.2 million
and consisted of net income of $7.8 million, adjustments for non-cash items of $11.0 million and
$1.4 million used by working capital and other activities. Working capital and other activities
primarily consisted of an increase in accounts receivable of $15.5 million, offset by an increase
in accounts payable and accrued liabilities of $11.1 million.
Cash used in investing activities in the six months ended June 30, 2007 of $54.4 million was
primarily attributable to the acquisition of healthcare facilities for $36.7 million, capital
expenditures of $12.6 million and cash distributed related to the Onex transaction of $7.3 million,
of which $6.3 million was used to pay our former stockholders for amounts paid to the Internal
Revenue Service in excess of the 2006 tax amounts on our tax return for the period ended December
27, 2005 and $1.0 million was used to fund an escrow account for the satisfaction of certain tax
liabilities that arose prior to the date of the Onex transaction. The Onex transaction refers to
the acquisition of Skilled Healthcare Group, Inc., our predecessor company and formerly known as
Fountain View, Inc. (SHG), by SHG Acquisition Corp. (Acquisition), effective December 27, 2005,
pursuant to that certain agreement and plan of merger, entered into in October 2005, by the
Company, SHG, Acquisition and SHGs former sponsor, Heritage Fund II LP and related investors.
Cash used in investing activities in the six months ended June 30, 2006 of $46.4 million was
primarily attributable to the acquisition of healthcare facilities for $34.0 million and capital
expenditures of $8.0 million.
Cash provided by financing activities in the six months ended June 30, 2007 of $46.1 million
primarily reflects the proceeds of our initial public offering, net of expenses, of $116.8
million, offset by the redemption of $70.0 million of our subordinated debt and the associated $7.7
million early redemption premium. In addition, net borrowings on our line of credit for the six
months ended June 30, 2007 were $10.5 million.
Cash used in financing activities in the six months ended June 30, 2006 of $1.4 million
consisted primarily of scheduled repayments of long-term debt and capital leases.
Principal Debt Obligations and Capital Expenditures
We are significantly leveraged. As of June 30, 2007, we had $408.6 million in aggregate
indebtedness outstanding, consisting of $129.3 million principal amount of our 11.0% senior
subordinated notes (net of the unamortized portion of the original issue discount of $0.7 million),
a $254.8 million first lien senior secured term loan that matures on June 15, 2012, $19.0 million
principal amount outstanding under our $100.0 million revolving credit facility that matures on June 15, 2010,
and capital leases and other debt of approximately $5.5 million. Furthermore, we have $4.2 million
in outstanding letters of credit against our $100.0 million revolver, leaving approximately $76.8
million of additional borrowing capacity under our amended senior secured credit facility. For the
six-month period ended June 30, 2007, our interest expense, net of interest income and other, was
$23.0 million.
We must maintain compliance with standard financial covenants measured on a quarterly basis,
including an interest coverage minimum ratio as well as a total maximum leverage ratio. The
covenants also include annual and lifetime limitations, including the incurrence of additional
indebtedness, liens, investments in other businesses and capital expenditures. Furthermore, in
addition to a $2.6 million annual permanent reduction requirement, we must permanently reduce the
principal amount of debt outstanding by applying the proceeds from any asset sale, insurance or
condemnation payments, additional indebtedness or
equity securities issuances, and 25% to 50% of excess cash flows from operations based on the
leverage ratio then in effect. We were in compliance with our debt covenants as of June 30, 2007.
32
Table of Contents
Substantially all of our subsidiaries guarantee our 11.0% senior subordinated notes, the first
lien senior secured term loan and our revolving credit facility. We have no independent assets or
operations and the guarantees provided by our subsidiaries are full and unconditional and joint and
several. Other subsidiaries that are not guarantors are considered minor.
We intend to invest in the maintenance and general upkeep of our facilities on an ongoing
basis. We expect to spend on average about $400 per annum per licensed bed for each of our skilled
nursing facilities and $400 per unit at each of our assisted living facilities. We also expect to
perform renovations of our existing facilities every five to ten years to remain competitive.
Combined, we expect that these activities will amount to between $8.0 million and $12.0 million in
capital expenditures per annum on our existing facilities. We are continuing with the expansion of
our Express Recoverytm units. We expect to open an additional 11 units before
December 31, 2007, bringing our total to 35 units with more than 1,100 beds or about 14.1% of our
total SNF beds. We plan on further Express Recoverytm unit expansions into
2008, as we continue to selectively target additional markets to accommodate high-acuity patients.
These units cost between $0.4 million and $0.6 million for each Express
Recoverytm unit. We have extended our relationship with Baylor Healthcare
System, which offers us the right to build on Baylor acute campuses. We currently have three
Baylor facilities we are in the process of developing, including two 136-bed skilled nursing
facilities in each of downtown Dallas and Fort Worth, and an additional 120- to 136-bed facility in
a northern suburb of Dallas. We are also in the process of developing two additional assisted
living facilities in our Kansas City market, much like the facility we recently opened in Ottawa,
Kansas. We expect the majority of these facilities to be completed by mid-2009. We anticipate
total capital expenditures for 2007 to range from $35.0 million to $38.0 million.
Based upon our current level of operations, we believe that cash generated from operations,
cash on hand and borrowings available to us will be adequate to meet our anticipated debt service
requirements, capital expenditures and working capital needs for at least the next 12 months. On
July 31, 2007, the Company and certain affiliates of Laurel
Healthcare Providers, LLC, entered into definitive agreements, pursuant to which we will acquire substantially all the
assets and assume the operations of several inter-related companies
related to ten skilled nursing facilities and a hospice company,
all of which are located in or around Albuquerque, New Mexico, for
approximately $51.5 million. We intend to fund this
acquisition by borrowing under our revolving credity facility. We cannot assure you, however, that
our business will generate sufficient cash flow from operations or that future borrowings will be
available under our senior secured credit facilities, or otherwise, to enable us to grow our
business, service our indebtedness, including our amended senior secured credit facilities and our
11.0% senior subordinated notes, or make anticipated capital expenditures. One element of our
business strategy is to selectively pursue acquisitions and strategic alliances. Any acquisitions
or strategic alliances may result in the incurrence of, or assumption by us, of additional
indebtedness. We continually assess our capital needs and may seek additional financing, including
debt or equity as considered necessary, to fund capital expenditures and potential acquisitions or
for other purposes. Our future operating performance, ability to service or refinance our 11.0%
senior subordinated notes and ability to service and extend or refinance our new senior secured
credit facilities and our 11.0% senior subordinated notes will be subject to future economic
conditions and to financial, business and other factors, many of which are beyond our control.
Other Factors Affecting Liquidity and Capital Resources
Medical and Professional Malpractice and Workers Compensation Insurance. In recent years,
physicians, hospitals and other healthcare providers have become subject to an increasing number of
legal actions alleging malpractice, product liability or related legal theories. Many of these
actions involve large claims and significant defense costs. To protect ourselves from the cost of
these claims, we maintain professional liability and general liability as well as workers
compensation insurance in amounts and with deductibles that we believe to be sufficient for our
operations. Historically, unfavorable pricing and availability trends emerged in the professional
liability and workers compensation insurance market and the insurance market in general that
caused the cost of these liability coverages to generally increase dramatically. Many insurance
underwriters became more selective in the insurance limits and types of
33
Table of Contents
coverage they would provide as a result of rising settlement costs and the significant
failures of some nationally known insurance underwriters. As a result, we experienced substantial
changes in our professional insurance program beginning in 2001. Specifically, we were required to
assume substantial self-insured retentions for our professional liability claims. A self-insured
retention is a minimum amount of damages and expenses (including legal fees) that we must pay for
each claim. We use actuarial methods to estimate the value of the losses that may occur within this
self-insured retention level and we are required under our workers compensation insurance
agreements to post a letter of credit or set aside cash in trust funds to securitize the entire
estimated losses that we will assume. Because of the high retention levels, we cannot predict with
absolute certainty the actual amount of the losses we will assume and pay.
We estimate our professional liability and general liability reserve on a quarterly basis and
our workers compensation reserve on a semi annual basis, based on actuarial analysis using the
most recent trends of claims, settlements and other relevant data from our own and our industrys
loss history. Based upon this analysis, at June 30, 2007, we had reserved $34.9 million for known
or unknown or potential uninsured professional liability and general liability and $11.4 million
for workers compensation claims. We have estimated that we may incur approximately $16.4 million
for professional and general liability claims and $3.0 million for workers compensation claims,
for a total of approximately $19.4 million to be payable within the next 12 months; however, there
are no set payment schedules and we cannot assure you that the payment amount in 2007 will not be
significantly larger. To the extent that subsequent claims information varies from loss estimates,
the liabilities will be adjusted to reflect current loss data. There can be no assurance that in
the future malpractice or workers compensation insurance will be available at a reasonable price
or that we will not have to further increase our levels of self-insurance.
Inflation. We derive a substantial portion of our revenue from the Medicare program. We also
derive revenue from state Medicaid and similar reimbursement programs. Payments under these
programs generally provide for reimbursement levels that are adjusted for inflation annually based
upon the states fiscal year for the Medicaid programs and in each October for the Medicare
program. However, we cannot assure you that these adjustments will continue in the future, or if
received, will reflect the actual increase in our costs for providing healthcare services.
Labor and supply expenses make up a substantial portion of our cost of services expenses.
Those expenses can be subject to increase in periods of rising inflation and when labor shortages
occur in the marketplace. To date, we have generally been able to implement cost control measures
or obtain increases in reimbursement sufficient to offset increases in these expenses. We cannot
assure you that we will be successful in offsetting future cost increases.
Seasonality. Our business experiences slight seasonality as a result of variation in average
daily census levels, with historically the highest average daily census in the first quarter of the
year and the lowest average daily census in the third quarter of the year. In addition, revenue has
typically increased in the fourth quarter of the year on a sequential basis due to annual increases
in Medicare and Medicaid rates that typically have been implemented during that quarter.
Off Balance Sheet Arrangements
As of June 30, 2007, we had no off-balance sheet arrangements.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
In the normal course of business, our operations are exposed to risks associated with
fluctuations in interest rates. We routinely monitor our risks associated with fluctuations in
interest rates and consider the use of derivative financial instruments to hedge these exposures.
We do not enter into derivative financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes, nor do
we enter into energy or commodity contracts. There have been no material changes in interest rate
risk since December 31, 2006 as discussed in our Registration Statement filed with the SEC.
34
Table of Contents
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Not applicable. See Item 4T below.
Item 4T. Controls and Procedures
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Our management, with the participation of our chief executive officer and chief financial
officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of June 30, 2007.
The term disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act, means controls and other
procedures of a company that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by a
company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed,
summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SECs rules and forms. Disclosure
controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure
that information required to be disclosed by a company in the reports that it files or submits
under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the companys management, including its
principal executive and principal financial officers, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions
regarding required disclosure. Our management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no
matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving their
objectives and management necessarily applies its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit
relationship of possible controls and procedures. Based on the evaluation of our disclosure
controls and procedures as of June 30, 2007, our chief executive officer and chief financial
officer concluded that, as of such date, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective at
the reasonable assurance level.
We are not yet required to comply with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. We will
be required to comply with Section 404 for the first time, and will be required to provide a
management report on internal control over financial reporting and an independent registered public
accounting firm attestation report on internal controls in connection with our Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2008. While we are not yet required to comply with
Section 404 for this reporting period, in order to achieve compliance with Section 404 within the
prescribed period, management has commenced a Section 404 compliance project under which management
has engaged outside consultants and adopted a project work plan to assess the adequacy of our
internal control over financial reporting, remediate any control deficiencies that may be
identified, validate through testing that controls are functioning as documented and implement a
continuous reporting and improvement process for internal control over financial reporting.
Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
During the quarter ended June 30, 2007, there have been no changes in our internal control
over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) that
have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over
financial reporting.
35
Table of Contents
Part II. Other Information
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
We are involved in legal proceedings and regulatory enforcement investigations from time to
time in the ordinary course of our business. We do not believe the outcome of these proceedings and
investigations will have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of
operations or cash flows.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
Statements made by us in this report and in other reports and statements released by us that
are not historical facts constitute forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements
are necessarily estimates reflecting the best judgment of our senior management based on our
current estimates, expectations, forecasts and projections and include comments that express our
current opinions about trends and factors that may impact future operating results. Disclosures
that use words such as we believe, anticipate, estimate, intend, could, plan, expect,
project or the negative of these, as well as similar expressions, are intended to identify
forward-looking statements. Such statements rely on a number of assumptions concerning future
events, many of which are outside of our control, and involve known and unknown risks and
uncertainties that could cause our actual results, performance or achievements, or industry
results, to differ materially from any future results, performance or achievements, expressed or
implied by such forward-looking statements. Any such forward-looking statements, whether made in
this report or elsewhere, should be considered in the context of the various disclosures made by us
about our businesses including, without limitation, the risk factors discussed below. We do not
plan to update any such forward-looking statements and expressly disclaim any duty to update the
information contained in this filing, except as required by law.
Risks Related to Our Business and Industry
Reductions in Medicare reimbursement rates or changes in the rules governing the Medicare program
could have a material adverse effect on our revenue, financial condition and results of operations.
Medicare is our largest source of revenue, accounting for 37.1% and 36.5% of our total
revenue during the three months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively, and 37.6% and 36.7%
during the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively. In addition, many private payors
base their reimbursement rates on the published Medicare rates or, in the case of our
rehabilitation therapy services, are themselves reimbursed by Medicare. Accordingly, if Medicare
reimbursement rates are reduced or fail to increase as quickly as our costs, or if there are
changes in the rules governing the Medicare program that are disadvantageous to our business or
industry, our business and results of operations will be adversely affected.
The Medicare program and its reimbursement rates and rules are subject to frequent
change. These include statutory and regulatory changes, rate adjustments (including retroactive
adjustments), administrative or executive orders and government funding restrictions, all of which
may materially adversely affect the rates at which Medicare reimburses us for our services.
Implementation of these and other types of measures has in the past, and could in the future,
result in substantial reductions in our revenues and operating margins. Prior reductions in
governmental reimbursement rates partially contributed to our bankruptcy filing under Chapter 11 of
the United States Bankruptcy Code in October 2001.
Budget pressures often lead the federal government to place limits on reimbursement
rates under Medicare. For instance, the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005, or DRA, included provisions
that are expected to reduce Medicare and Medicaid payments to skilled nursing facilities by $100.0
million over five years (i.e., federal fiscal years 2006 through 2010). Also, effective January 1,
2006, there are caps on the annual amount that Medicare Part B will pay for physical and speech
language therapy and occupation therapy for any given patient. Despite certain exceptions
applicable through the end of 2007, these caps may result in
36
Table of Contents
decreased demand for rehabilitation therapy services for beneficiaries whose therapy would
have been reimbursed under Part B but for the caps. This decrease in demand could be exacerbated if
the exceptions to the caps expire and are not continued beyond December 31, 2007.
In addition, the federal government often changes the rules governing the Medicare
program, including those governing reimbursement. Changes that could adversely affect our business
include:
| administrative or legislative changes to base rates or the bases of payment; | ||
| limits on the services or types of providers for which Medicare will provide reimbursement; | ||
| the reduction or elimination of annual rate increases; or | ||
| an increase in co-payments or deductibles payable by beneficiaries. |
On February 5, 2007, President Bush submitted his proposed 2008 budget to Congress.
Through legislative and regulatory action, the President proposes to reduce Medicare spending by
$5.3 billion in fiscal year 2008 and by $75.9 billion over five years. The budget would, among
other things, freeze payments to skilled nursing facilities in 2008 and reduce payment updates for
hospice services. The President also proposes to eliminate bad debt reimbursement for unpaid
beneficiary cost sharing over four years for all providers, including skilled nursing facilities.
Medicare currently pays 70% of unpaid beneficiary co-payments and deductibles to skilled nursing
facilities.
Given the history of frequent revisions to the Medicare program and its reimbursement rates
and rules, we may not continue to receive reimbursement rates from Medicare that sufficiently
compensate us for our services. Limits on reimbursement rates or the scope of services being
reimbursed could have a material adverse effect on our revenues, financial condition and results of
operations. For a more comprehensive description of recent changes in reimbursement rates provided
by Medicare, see Business Sources of Reimbursement Medicare in our Registration Statement
filed with the SEC.
We expect the federal and state governments to continue their efforts to contain growth in
Medicaid expenditures, which could adversely affect our revenue and profitability.
We receive a significant portion of our revenue from Medicaid, which accounted for
30.3% and 31.5% of our total revenue during the three months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006,
respectively, and 29.9% and 31.6% in the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively. In
addition, many private payors for our rehabilitation therapy services are reimbursed under the
Medicaid program. Accordingly, if Medicaid reimbursement rates are reduced or fail to increase as
quickly as our costs, or if there are changes in the rules governing the Medicaid program that are
disadvantageous to our business or industry, our business and results of operations could be
adversely affected.
Medicaid is a state-administered program financed by both state funds and matching federal
funds. Medicaid spending has increased rapidly in recent years, becoming a significant component of
state budgets. This, combined with slower state revenue growth, has led both the federal government
and many states to institute measures aimed at controlling the growth of Medicaid spending. For
example, the DRA included several measures that are expected to reduce Medicare and Medicaid
payments to skilled nursing facilities by $100.0 million over five years. These included limiting
the circumstances under which an individual may become financially eligible for nursing home
services under Medicaid, which could result in fewer patients being able to afford our services. In
addition, the presidential budget submitted for federal fiscal year 2008 includes proposed reform
of the Medicaid program to cut a total of $25.7 billion in Medicaid expenditures over the next five
years.
We expect continuing cost containment pressures on Medicaid outlays for skilled nursing
facilities both by the states in which we operate and by the federal government. These may take the
form of both direct decreases in reimbursement rates or in rule changes that limit the
beneficiaries, services or providers eligible to receive Medicaid benefits. For a description of
currently proposed reductions in Medicaid expenditures and a description of the implementation of
the Medicaid program in the states in which we
operate, see Business Sources of Reimbursement Medicaid in our Registration Statement
filed with the SEC.
37
Table of Contents
Recent federal government proposals could limit the states use of provider tax programs to
generate revenue for their Medicaid expenditures, which could result in a reduction in our
reimbursement rates under Medicaid.
To generate funds to pay for the increasing costs of the Medicaid program, many
states utilize financial arrangements such as provider taxes. Under provider tax arrangements, a
state collects taxes from health care providers and then returns the revenue to these providers as
a Medicaid expenditure. This allows the state to claim federal matching funds on this additional
reimbursement. The Tax Relief and Health Care Act of 2006, signed into law on December 20, 2006,
reduced the maximum allowable provider tax from 6% to 5.5% from January 1, 2008 through October 1,
2011. As a result, many states may have less funds available for payment of Medicaid expenses,
which would also decrease their federal matching payments.
Revenue we receive from Medicare and Medicaid is subject to potential retroactive
reduction.
Payments we receive from Medicare and Medicaid can be retroactively adjusted after a new
examination during the claims settlement process or as a result of post-payment audits. Payors may
disallow our requests for reimbursement based on determinations that certain costs are not
reimbursable because either adequate or additional documentation was not provided or because
certain services were not covered or deemed to be medically necessary. Congress and CMS may also
impose further limitations on government payments to healthcare providers. Significant adjustments
to our Medicare or Medicaid revenues could adversely affect our financial condition and results of
operations.
Healthcare reform legislation could adversely affect our revenue and financial
condition.
In recent years, there have been numerous initiatives on the federal and state
levels for comprehensive reforms affecting the payment for, the availability of, and reimbursement
for, healthcare services in the United States. These initiatives have ranged from proposals to
fundamentally change federal and state healthcare reimbursement programs, including to provide
comprehensive healthcare coverage to the public under governmental funded programs, to minor
modifications to existing programs. The ultimate content or timing of any future healthcare reform
legislation, and its impact on us, is impossible to predict. If significant reforms are made to the
U.S. healthcare system, those reforms may have an adverse effect on our financial condition and
results of operations.
In addition, we incur considerable administrative costs in monitoring the changes made within
the various reimbursement programs, determining the appropriate actions to be taken in response to
those changes and implementing the required actions to meet the new requirements and minimize the
repercussions of the changes to our organization, reimbursement rates and costs.
We are subject to extensive and complex laws and government regulations. If we are
not operating in compliance with these laws and regulations or if these laws and regulations
change, we could be required to make significant expenditures or change our operations in order to
bring our facilities and operations into compliance.
We, along with other companies in the healthcare industry, are required to comply
with extensive and complex laws and regulations at the federal, state and local government levels
relating to, among other things:
| licensure and certification; | ||
| adequacy and quality of healthcare services; | ||
| qualifications of healthcare and support personnel; | ||
| quality of medical equipment; |
38
Table of Contents
| confidentiality, maintenance and security issues associated with health care information and claims processing; | ||
| relationships with physicians and other referral sources and recipients; | ||
| constraints on protective contractual provisions with patients and third-party payors; | ||
| operating policies and procedures; | ||
| addition of facilities and services; and | ||
| billing for services. |
Many of these laws and regulations are expansive, and we do not always have the benefit
of significant regulatory or judicial interpretation of these laws and regulations. In addition,
certain regulatory developments, such as revisions in the building code requirements for assisted
living and skilled nursing facilities, mandatory increases in scope and quality of care to be
offered to residents and revisions in licensing and certification standards, could have a material
adverse effect on us. In the future, different interpretations or enforcement of these laws and
regulations could subject our current or past practices to allegations of impropriety or illegality
or could require us to make changes in our facilities, equipment, personnel, services, capital
expenditure programs and operating expenses.
In addition, federal and state government agencies have heightened and coordinated civil
and criminal enforcement efforts as part of numerous ongoing investigations of healthcare companies
and, in particular, skilled nursing facilities. This includes investigations of:
| fraud and abuse; | ||
| quality of care; | ||
| financial relationships with referral sources; and | ||
| the medical necessity of services provided. |
We are unable to predict the future course of federal, state and local regulation or
legislation, including Medicare and Medicaid statutes and regulations, or the intensity of federal
and state enforcement actions. Changes in the regulatory framework, our failure to obtain or renew
required regulatory approvals or licenses or to comply with applicable regulatory requirements, the
suspension or revocation of our licenses or our disqualification from participation in federal and
state reimbursement programs, or the imposition of other harsh enforcement sanctions could have a
material adverse effect upon our results of operations, financial condition and liquidity.
Furthermore, should we lose licenses or certifications for a number of our facilities as a result
of regulatory action or otherwise, we could be deemed to be in default under some of our
agreements, including agreements governing outstanding indebtedness and the report of such issues
at one of our facilities could harm our reputation for quality care and lead to a reduction in our
patient referrals and ultimately our revenue and operating income. For a discussion of the material
government regulations applicable to our business, see Business Government Regulation in our
Registration Statement filed with the SEC.
We face periodic reviews, audits and investigations under federal and state government
programs and contracts. These audits could have adverse findings that may negatively affect our
business.
As a result of our participation in the Medicare and Medicaid programs, we are
subject to various governmental reviews, audits and investigations to verify our compliance with
these programs and applicable laws and regulations. Private pay sources also reserve the right to
conduct audits. An adverse review, audit or investigation could result in:
| refunding amounts we have been paid pursuant to the Medicare or Medicaid programs or from private payors; | ||
| state or federal agencies imposing fines, penalties and other sanctions on us; | ||
| temporary suspension of payment for new patients to the facility; |
39
Table of Contents
| decertification or exclusion from participation in the Medicare or Medicaid programs or one or more private payor networks; | ||
| damage to our reputation; | ||
| the revocation of a facilitys license; and | ||
| loss of certain rights under, or termination of, our contracts with managed care payors. |
Significant legal actions, which are commonplace in our industry, could subject us to increased
operating costs and substantial uninsured liabilities, which would materially and adversely affect
our results of operations, liquidity and financial condition.
The long-term care industry has experienced an increasing trend in the number and
severity of litigation claims involving punitive damages and settlements. We believe that this
trend is endemic to the industry and is a result of the increasing number of large judgments,
including large punitive damage awards, against long-term care providers in recent years resulting
in an increased awareness by plaintiffs lawyers of potentially large recoveries. According to a
report issued by AON Risk Consultants in March 2005 on long-term care operators professional
liability and general liability costs, the average cost per bed for professional liability and
general liability costs has increased from $430 in 1993 to $2,310 per bed in 2004. This has
resulted from average professional liability and general liability claims in the long-term care
industry more than doubling from $72,000 in 1993 to $176,000 in 2004 and the average number of
claims per 1,000 beds increasing at an average annual rate of 10% from 6.0 in 1993 to 13.1 in 2004.
Our long-term care operators professional liability and general liability cost per bed was $1,385
in 2006 and $1,892 in 2005, as compared to our average revenue per bed of $74,280 in 2006 and
$70,443 in 2005. Our professional and general liability cost per bed decreased in 2006 due to a
favorable downward adjustment in our actuarially estimated costs of $3.2 million, primarily
associated with the favorable impact of Texas tort reform established in 2003, and our acquisitions
in Kansas and Missouri, which have existing tort reform laws. Should a trend of increasing
professional liability and general liability costs occur, we may not be able to increase our
revenue sufficiently to cover the cost increases, and our operating income could suffer.
We could face significant financial difficulty as a result of one or more of the
risks discussed above, which could cause our stock price to decline, could cause us to seek
protection under bankruptcy laws or could cause our creditors to have a receiver appointed on our
behalf.
We could face significant financial difficulty if Medicare or Medicaid
reimbursement rates are reduced, patient demand for our services is reduced or we incur unexpected
liabilities or expenses, including in connection with legal actions. This financial difficulty
could cause our stock price to decline, could cause us to seek protection under bankruptcy laws or
could cause our creditors to have a receiver appointed on our behalf.
In 2001, we filed a voluntary petition for protection under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy
Code, or Chapter 11. See Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results
of Operations Historical Overview Reorganization under Chapter 11 in our Registration
Statement filed with the SEC.
The financial difficulties that led to our filing under Chapter 11 were caused by a
combination of industry and company specific factors. Effective in 1997, the federal government
fundamentally changed the reimbursement system for skilled nursing operators, which had a
significant adverse effect on the cash flows of many providers, including us. Soon thereafter, we
also began to experience significant industry-wide increases in our labor costs and professional
liability and other insurance costs that adversely affected our operating results.
In late 2000, one of our facilities was temporarily decertified from the Medicare and Medicaid
programs for alleged regulatory compliance reasons, causing a significant loss and delay in receipt
of revenue at this facility. During this time, a patient brought a claim against us for negligence,
infliction of emotional distress and willful misconduct. The plaintiff was able to obtain a
judgment in the amount of approximately
40
Table of Contents
$6.0 million. These events occurred as the amortization of principal payments on our then
outstanding senior debt substantially increased. To preserve resources for our operations, we
discontinued amortization payments on our senior debt and interest payments on our subordinated
debt and began to negotiate with our lenders to restructure our balance sheet. Early in the fourth
quarter of 2001, before we could reach an agreement with our lenders, the plaintiff in the
professional liability litigation placed a lien on our assets, including our cash. With our ability
to operate severely restricted, we filed for protection under Chapter 11. We ultimately settled the
professional liability claim for approximately $1.1 million, an amount that was fully covered by
insurance proceeds. It is possible that future professional liability claims could harm our ability
to meet our obligations or repay our liabilities.
A significant portion of our business is concentrated in a few markets, and an
economic downturn or changes in the laws affecting our business in those markets could have a
material adverse effect on our operating results.
In the six months ended June 30, 2007, we received approximately 50.6% and 30.6% of our
revenue from operations in California and Texas, respectively, and in the six months ended June 30,
2006, we received approximately 54.0% and 34.0% of our revenue from operations in California and
Texas, respectively. Accordingly, isolated economic conditions prevailing in either of these
markets could affect the ability of our patients and third-party payors to reimburse us for our
services, either through a reduction of the tax base used to generate state funding of Medicaid
programs, an increase in the number of indigent patients eligible for Medicaid benefits or other
factors. An economic downturn or changes in the laws affecting our business in these markets could
have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations and cash flows.
Possible changes in the acuity mix of residents and patients as well as payor mix and
payment methodologies may significantly reduce our profitability or cause us to incur losses.
Our revenue is affected by our ability to attract a favorable patient acuity mix,
and by our mix of payment sources. Changes in the type of patients we attract, as well as our payor
mix among private payors, managed care companies, Medicare and Medicaid, significantly affect our
profitability because not all payors reimburse us at the same rates. Particularly, if we fail to
maintain our proportion of high-acuity patients or if there is any significant increase in the
percentage of our population for which we receive Medicaid reimbursement, our financial position,
results of operations and cash flow may be adversely affected.
It is difficult to attract and retain qualified nurses, therapists, healthcare professionals
and other key personnel, which increases our costs relating to these employees and could adversely
affect our profitability.
We rely on our ability to attract and retain qualified nurses, therapists and other
healthcare professionals. The market for these key personnel is highly competitive, and we could
experience significant increases in our operating costs due to shortages in their availability.
Like other healthcare providers, we have experienced difficulties in attracting and retaining
qualified personnel, especially facility administrators, nurses, therapists, certified nurses
aides and other important healthcare personnel. We may continue to experience increases in our
labor costs, primarily due to higher wages and greater benefits required to attract and retain
qualified healthcare personnel, and such increases may adversely affect our profitability.
This shrinking labor market and the high demand for such employees has created high turnover
among clinical professional staff, as many seek to take advantage of the supply of available
positions. A lack of qualified personnel at a facility could result in significant increases in
labor costs and an increased reliance on expensive temporary nursing agencies or otherwise
adversely affect operations at that facility. If we are unable to attract and retain qualified
professionals, our ability to provide services to our residents and patients may decline and our
ability to grow may be constrained.
41
Table of Contents
If we are unable to comply with state minimum staffing requirements at one or more
of our facilities, we could be subject to fines or other sanctions.
Increased attention to the quality of care provided in skilled nursing facilities has
caused several states to mandate, and other states to consider mandating, minimum staffing laws
that require minimum nursing hours of direct care per resident per day. These minimum staffing
requirements further increase the gap between demand for and supply of qualified professionals, and
lead to higher labor costs.
We operate a number of facilities in California, which has enacted legislation establishing
minimum staffing requirements for facilities operating in that state. This legislation requires
that the California Department of Health Services, or DHS, promulgate regulations requiring each
skilled nursing facility to provide a minimum of 3.2 nursing hours per patient day. Although DHS
has not promulgated such regulations, it enforces this requirement through on-site reviews
conducted during periodic licensing and certification surveys and in response to complaints. If a
facility is determined to be out of compliance with this minimum staffing requirement, DHS may
issue a notice of deficiency, or a citation, depending on the impact on patient care. A citation
carries with it the imposition of monetary fines that can range from $100 to $100,000 per citation.
The issuance of either a notice of deficiency or a citation requires the facility to prepare and
implement an acceptable plan of correction.
Our ability to satisfy these minimum staffing requirements depends upon our ability to attract
and retain qualified healthcare professionals, including nurses, certified nurses assistants and
other personnel. As mentioned above, attracting and retaining these personnel is difficult, given
existing shortages in the labor markets in which we operate. Furthermore, if states do not
appropriate additional funds (through Medicaid program appropriations or otherwise) sufficient to
pay for any additional operating costs resulting from minimum staffing requirements, our
profitability may be materially adversely affected.
If we fail to attract patients and residents or to compete effectively with other
healthcare providers, our revenue and profitability may decline and we may incur losses.
The long-term healthcare services industry is highly competitive. Our skilled nursing
facilities compete primarily on a local and regional basis with many long-term care providers, from
national and regional chains to smaller providers owning as few as a single nursing center. We also
compete with inpatient rehabilitation facilities and long-term acute care hospitals. Increased
competition could limit our ability to attract and retain patients, maintain or increase rates or
to expand our business. Our ability to compete successfully varies from location to location
depending on a number of factors, including the number of competing centers in the local market,
the types of services available, our local reputation for quality care of patients, the commitment
and expertise of our staff and physicians, our local service offerings and treatment programs, the
cost of care in each locality, and the physical appearance, location, age and condition of our
facilities. If we are unable to attract patients to our facilities, particularly the high-acuity
patients we target, then our revenue and profitability will be adversely affected. Some of our
competitors have greater financial and other resources than us, may have greater brand recognition
and may be more established in their respective communities than we are. Competing long-term care
companies may also offer newer facilities or different programs or services than we do and may
thereby attract our patients who are presently residents of our facilities, potential residents of
our facilities, or who are otherwise receiving our healthcare services. Other competitors may
accept a lower margin, and therefore, present significant price competition for managed care and
private pay patients.
We also encounter competition in connection with our other related healthcare services,
including our rehabilitation therapy services provided to third-party facilities, assisted living
facilities, hospice care and institutional pharmacy services. Generally, this competition is
national, regional and local in nature. Many companies competing in these industries have greater
financial and other resources than we have. The primary competitive factors for these other related
healthcare services are similar to those for our skilled nursing and rehabilitation therapy
businesses and include reputation, the cost of services, the quality of clinical services,
responsiveness to customer needs and the ability to provide support in other areas such as
third-party reimbursement, information management and patient record-keeping. Given the relatively
low barriers to entry and continuing healthcare cost containment pressures in the assisted living
industry, we
42
Table of Contents
expect that the assisted living industry will become increasingly competitive in the future.
Increased competition in the future could limit our ability to attract and retain residents,
maintain or increase resident service fees, or expand our business.
In addition, our institutional pharmacy services generally compete on price and quality of the
services provided. The introduction of the Medicare Part D benefit may also have an impact on our
competitiveness in the pharmacy business by providing patients with an increased range of pharmacy
alternatives and putting pressure on pharmacy plans to reduce prices.
Insurance coverage may become increasingly expensive and difficult to obtain for
long-term care companies, and our self-insurance may expose us to significant losses.
It may become more difficult and costly for us to obtain coverage for patient care
liabilities and certain other risks, including property and casualty insurance. Insurance carriers
may require long-term care companies to significantly increase their self-insured retention levels
and/or pay substantially higher premiums for reduced coverage for most insurance coverages,
including workers compensation, employee healthcare and patient care liability.
We self-insure a significant portion of our potential liabilities for several risks, including
professional liability, general liability and workers compensation. In California, Texas and
Nevada, we have professional and general liability insurance with an individual claim limit of $2.0
million per loss and an annual aggregate coverage limit for all facilities in these states of $6.0
million. In Kansas, we have occurrence-based professional and general liability insurance with an
occurrence limit of $1.0 million per loss and an annual aggregate coverage limit of $3.0 million
for each individual facility. In Missouri, we have claims-made based professional and general
liability insurance with an individual claim limit of $1.0 million per loss and an annual aggregate
coverage limit of $3.0 million for each individual facility. We have also purchased excess general
and professional liability insurance coverage providing an additional $12.0 million of coverage for
losses arising from any claims in excess of $3.0 million. We also maintain a $1.0 million
self-insured professional and general liability retention per claim in California, Nevada and
Texas. We maintain no deductibles in Kansas and Missouri. Additionally, we self-insure the first
$1.0 million per workers compensation claim in each of California and Nevada. We purchase workers
compensation policies for Kansas and Missouri with no deductibles. We have elected to not carry
workers compensation insurance in Texas and we may be liable for negligence claims that are
asserted against us by our employees.
Due to our self-insured retentions under our professional and general liability and workers
compensation programs, including our election to self-insure against workers compensation claims
in Texas, there is no limit on the maximum number of claims or amount for which we can be liable in
any policy period. We base our loss estimates on actuarial analyses, which determine expected
liabilities on an undiscounted basis, including incurred but not reported losses, based upon the
available information on a given date. It is possible, however, for the ultimate amount of losses
to exceed our estimates and our insurance limits. In the event our actual liability exceeds our
estimates for any given period, our results of operations and financial condition could be
materially adversely impacted.
At June 30, 2007, we had $34.9 million in accruals for known or potential uninsured general
and professional liability claims and $11.4 million in accruals for workers compensation, based on
claims experience and an independent actuarial review. We may need to increase our accruals as a
result of future actuarial reviews and claims that may develop. An adverse determination in legal
proceedings, whether currently asserted or arising in the future, could have a material adverse
effect on our business.
If our referral sources fail to view us as an attractive long-term care provider,
our patient base may decrease.
We rely significantly on appropriate referrals from physicians, hospitals and other
healthcare providers in the communities in which we deliver our services to attract the kinds of
patients we target. Our referral
43
Table of Contents
sources are not obligated to refer business to us and may refer business to other healthcare
providers. We believe many of our referral sources refer business to us as a result of the quality
of our patient service and our efforts to establish and build a relationship with them. If we lose,
or fail to maintain, existing relationships with our referral resources, fail to develop new
relationships or if we are perceived by our referral sources for any reason as not providing high
quality patient care, the quality of our patient mix could suffer and our revenue and profitability
could decline.
We may be unable to reduce costs to offset decreases in our occupancy rates or
other expenses completely.
We depend on implementing adequate cost management initiatives in response to
fluctuations in levels of occupancy in our skilled nursing and assisted living facilities and in
other sources of income in order to maintain our current cash flow and earnings levels. Fluctuation
in our occupancy levels may become more common as we increase our emphasis on patients with shorter
stays but higher acuities. A decline in our occupancy rates could result in decreased revenue. If
we are unable to put in place corresponding reductions in costs in response to falls in census or
other revenue shortfalls, we may be unable to prevent future decreases in earnings. As a result,
our financial condition and operating results may be adversely affected.
If we do not achieve or maintain a reputation for providing high quality of care,
our business may be negatively affected.
Our ability to achieve or maintain a reputation for providing high quality of care
to our patients at each of our skilled nursing and assisted living facilities, or through our
rehabilitation therapy and hospice businesses, is important to our ability to attract and retain
patients, particularly high-acuity patients. We believe that the perception of our quality of care
by a potential patient or potential patients family seeking to contract for our services is
influenced by a variety of factors, including doctor and other healthcare professional referrals,
community information and referral services, newspapers and other print and electronic media,
results of patient surveys, recommendations from family and friends, published quality care
statistics compiled by CMS or other industry data. Through our focus on retaining high quality
staffing, reviewing feedback and surveys from our patients and referral sources to highlight areas
of improvement and integrating our service offerings at each of our facilities, we seek to maintain
and improve on the outcomes from each of the factors listed above in order to build and maintain a
strong reputation at our facilities. If any of our skilled nursing or assisted living facilities
fail to achieve or maintain a reputation for providing high-quality care, or is perceived to
provide a lower quality of care than comparable facilities within the same geographic area, or
users of our rehabilitation therapy services perceive that they could receive higher quality
services from other providers, our ability to attract and retain patients at such facility could be
adversely affected. If this perception were to become widespread within the areas in which we
operate, our revenue and profitability could be adversely affected.
Consolidation of managed care organizations and other third-party payors or
reductions in reimbursement from these payors may adversely affect our revenue and income or cause
us to incur losses.
Managed care organizations and other third-party payors have continued to
consolidate in order to enhance their ability to influence the delivery of healthcare services.
Consequently, the healthcare needs of a large percentage of the United States population are
increasingly served by a small number of managed care organizations. These organizations generally
enter into service agreements with a limited number of providers for needed services. These
organizations have become an increasingly important source of revenue and referrals for us. To the
extent that such organizations terminate us as a preferred provider or engage our competitors as a
preferred or exclusive provider, our business could be materially adversely affected.
44
Table of Contents
In addition, private third-party payors, including managed care payors, are continuing their
efforts to control healthcare costs through direct contracts with healthcare providers, increased
utilization reviews, or
reviews of the propriety of, and charges for, services provided, and greater enrollment in
managed care programs and preferred provider organizations. As these private payors increase their
purchasing power, they are demanding discounted fee structures and the assumption by healthcare
providers of all or a portion of the financial risk associated with the provision of care.
Significant reductions in reimbursement from these sources could materially adversely affect our
business.
Annual caps that limit the amounts that can be paid for outpatient therapy services rendered
to any Medicare beneficiary may reduce our future net operating revenue and profitability or cause
us to incur losses.
Some of our rehabilitation therapy revenue is paid by the Medicare Part B program
under a fee schedule. Congress has established annual caps that limit the amounts that can be paid
(including deductible and coinsurance amounts) for rehabilitation therapy services rendered to any
Medicare beneficiary under Medicare Part B. The Balanced Budget Act of 1997, or BBA, requires a
combined cap for physical therapy and speech-language pathology and a separate cap for occupational
therapy. Due to a series of moratoria enacted subsequent to the BBA, the caps were only in effect
in 1999 and for a few months in 2003. With the expiration of the most recent moratorium, the caps
were reinstated on January 1, 2006 at $1,740 for the physical therapy and speech therapy cap and
$1,740 for the occupational therapy cap. Each of these caps increased to $1,780 on January 1, 2007.
President Bush signed the DRA into law on February 8, 2006. The DRA directed CMS to create a
process to allow exceptions to therapy caps for certain medically necessary services provided on or
after January 1, 2006 for patients with certain conditions or multiple complexities whose therapy
is reimbursed under Medicare Part B. The majority of the residents in our skilled nursing
facilities and patients served by our rehabilitation therapy programs whose therapy is reimbursed
under Medicare Part B have qualified for the exceptions to these reimbursement caps. The Tax Relief
and Health Care Act of 2006 extended the exceptions through the end of 2007. Unless further
extended, these exceptions will expire on December 31, 2007.
The application of annual caps, or the discontinuation of exceptions to the annual caps, could
have an adverse effect on our integrated rehabilitation therapy revenue as well as the
rehabilitation therapy revenue that we receive from third-party facilities for treating their
Medicare Part B beneficiaries. Additionally, the exceptions to these caps may not be extended
beyond December 31, 2007, which would have an even greater adverse effect on our revenue.
Delays in reimbursement may cause liquidity problems.
If we have information systems problems or issues arise with Medicare, Medicaid or
other payors, we may encounter delays in our payment cycle. Any future timing delay may cause
working capital shortages. As a result, working capital management, including prompt and diligent
billing and collection, is an important factor in our consolidated results of operations and
liquidity. Our working capital management procedures may not successfully ameliorate the effects of
any delays in our receipt of payments or reimbursements. Accordingly, such delays could have an
adverse effect on our liquidity and financial condition.
Our rehabilitation and other related healthcare services are also subject to delays in
reimbursement, as we act as vendors to other providers who in turn must wait for reimbursement from
other third-party payors. Each of these customers is therefore subject to the same potential delays
to which our nursing homes are subject, meaning any such delays would further delay the date we
would receive payment for the provision of our related healthcare services.
For example, the California legislature, which, in part, approves funding for the States Medicaid
program, or Medi-Cal, has not approved additional funding prior to its recent recess and will not approve
a State operating budget until it returns on August 20, 2007. Since previously allocated
funding was depleted as of June, we anticipate payment delays in Medi-Cal payments until a budget is approved, unless remedial measures are implemented before that time. As we continue to grow
and expand the rehabilitation and other complementary services that we offer to third parties, we
may incur increasing delays in payment for these services, and these payment delays could have an
adverse effect on our liquidity and financial condition.
45
Table of Contents
Our success is dependent upon retaining key personnel.
Our senior management team has extensive experience in the healthcare industry. We
believe that they have been instrumental in guiding our emergence from Chapter 11, instituting
valuable performance and quality monitoring and driving innovation. Accordingly, our future
performance is substantially dependent upon the continued services of our senior management team.
The loss of the services of any of these persons could have a material adverse effect upon us.
Future acquisitions may use significant resources, may be unsuccessful and could
expose us to unforeseen liabilities.
We intend to selectively pursue acquisitions of skilled nursing facilities,
assisted living facilities and other related healthcare operations. Acquisitions may involve
significant cash expenditures, debt incurrence, operating losses and additional expenses that could
have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations and liquidity.
Acquisitions involve numerous risks, including:
| difficulties integrating acquired operations, personnel and accounting and information systems, or in realizing projected efficiencies and cost savings; | ||
| diversion of managements attention from other business concerns; | ||
| potential loss of key employees or customers of acquired companies; | ||
| entry into markets in which we may have limited or no experience; | ||
| increasing our indebtedness and limiting our ability to access additional capital when needed; | ||
| assumption of unknown material liabilities or regulatory issues of acquired companies, including for failure to comply with healthcare regulations; and | ||
| straining of our resources, including internal controls relating to information and accounting systems, regulatory compliance, logistics and others. |
Furthermore, certain of the foregoing risks could be exacerbated when combined with
other growth measures that we expect to pursue.
Our substantial indebtedness could adversely affect our financial health and
prevent us from fulfilling our financial obligations.
We have a significant amount of indebtedness. On June 30, 2007, our total
indebtedness was approximately $408.6 million.
Our substantial indebtedness could have important consequences to you. For example,
it could:
| increase our vulnerability to adverse economic and industry conditions; | ||
| require us to dedicate a substantial portion of our cash flow from operations to payments on our indebtedness, thereby reducing the availability of our cash flow to fund working capital, capital expenditures and other general purposes; | ||
| limit our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in our business and the industry in which we operate; | ||
| place us at a competitive disadvantage compared to our competitors that have less debt; | ||
| increase the cost or limit the availability of additional financing, if needed or desired, to fund future working capital, capital expenditures and other general requirements, or to carry out other aspects of our business plan; | ||
| require us to maintain debt coverage and financial ratios at specified levels, reducing our financial flexibility; and |
| limit our ability to make strategic acquisitions and develop new facilities. |
46
Table of Contents
In addition, if we are unable to generate sufficient cash flow or otherwise obtain
funds necessary to make required debt payments, or if we fail to comply with the various covenants
and requirements of our 11% senior subordinated notes, our senior secured credit facility or other
existing or future indebtedness, we would be in default, which could permit the holders of our 11%
senior subordinated notes and the holders of our other indebtedness, including our senior secured
credit facility, to accelerate the maturity of the notes or such other indebtedness, as the case
may be. Any default under the notes, our senior secured credit facility, or our other existing or
future indebtedness, as well as any of the above-listed factors, could have a material adverse
effect on our business, operating results, liquidity and financial condition.
Despite our substantial indebtedness, we may still be able to incur more debt. This
could intensify the risks associated with this indebtedness.
The terms of the indenture governing our 11% senior subordinated notes and our
senior secured credit facility contain restrictions on our ability to incur additional
indebtedness. These restrictions are subject to a number of important qualifications and
exceptions, and the indebtedness incurred in compliance with these exceptions could be substantial.
Accordingly, we could incur significant additional indebtedness in the future. In addition, as of
June 30, 2007, we had approximately $76.8 million available for additional borrowing under our
first lien revolving credit facility. The more we become leveraged, the more we become exposed to
the risks described above under Our substantial indebtedness could adversely affect our
financial health and prevent us from fulfilling our financial obligations.
Our operations are subject to environmental and occupational health and safety
regulations, which could subject us to fines, penalties and increased operational costs.
We are subject to a wide variety of federal, state and local environmental and
occupational health and safety laws and regulations. Regulatory requirements faced by healthcare
providers such as us include those relating to air emissions, waste water discharges, air and water
quality control, occupational health and safety (such as standards regarding blood-borne pathogens
and ergonomics), management and disposal of low-level radioactive medical waste, biohazards and
other wastes, management of explosive or combustible gases, such as oxygen, specific regulatory
requirements applicable to asbestos, lead-based paints, polychlorinated biphenyls and mold, and
providing notice to employees and members of the public about our use and storage of regulated or
hazardous materials and wastes. Failure to comply with these requirements could subject us to
fines, penalties and increased operational costs. Moreover, changes in existing requirements or
more stringent enforcement of them, as well as discovery of currently unknown conditions at our
owned or leased facilities, could result in additional cost and potential liabilities, including
liability for conducting clean-up, and there can be no guarantee that such increased expenditures
would not be significant.
A portion of our workforce has unionized and our operations may be adversely
affected by work stoppages, strikes or other collective actions.
Certain of our employees are represented by various unions and covered by
collective bargaining agreements. In addition, certain labor unions have publicly stated that they
are concentrating their organizing efforts within the long-term health care industry. We cannot
predict the effect that continued union representation or future organizational activities will
have on our business or future operations. We cannot assure you that we will not experience a
material work stoppage in the future.
Natural disasters, terrorist attacks or acts of war may seriously harm our
business.
Terrorist attacks or acts of nature, such as hurricanes or earthquakes, may cause
damage or disruption to us, our employees and our facilities, which could have an adverse impact on
our residents. In order to provide care for our residents, we are dependent on consistent and
reliable delivery of food,
47
Table of Contents
pharmaceuticals, power and other products to our facilities and the availability of employees
to provide services at our facilities. If the delivery of goods or the ability of employees to
reach our facilities were interrupted due to a natural disaster or a terrorist attack, it would
have a significant impact on our facilities. For example, in connection with Hurricane Katrina in
New Orleans, several nursing home operators unaffiliated with us have been accused of not properly
caring for their residents, which has resulted in, among other things, criminal charges being filed
against the proprietors of those facilities. Furthermore, the impact, or impending threat, of a
natural disaster has in the past and may in the future require that we evacuate one or more
facilities, which would be costly and would involve risks, including potentially fatal risks, for
the patients. The impact of natural disasters and terrorist attacks is inherently uncertain. Such
events could severely damage or destroy one or more of our facilities, harm our business,
reputation and financial performance or otherwise cause our business to suffer in ways that we
currently cannot predict.
The efficient operation of our business is dependent on our information systems.
We depend on several information technology systems for the efficient functioning
of our business. The software programs supporting these systems are licensed to us by independent
software developers. Our inability, or the inability of these developers, to continue to maintain
and upgrade these information systems and software programs could disrupt or reduce the efficiency
of our operations. In addition, costs and potential problems and interruptions associated with the
implementation of new or upgraded systems and technology or with maintenance or adequate support of
existing systems could also disrupt or reduce the efficiency of our operations. For example, during
the first quarter of 2007, we implemented an upgrade to our general ledger system, including
reorganizing our financial database configuration, implementing a redesigned chart of accounts and
providing for the production of new financial reports. There are inherent risks associated with
modifications to our general ledger system, including the potential for inaccurately capturing data
as well as system disruptions. Either of these problems, if not anticipated and appropriately
mitigated, could have a negative impact on our ability to provide timely and accurate financial
reporting and have a material adverse effect on our operations.
Risks Related to Ownership of Our Class A Common Stock
We are controlled by Onex Corporation, whose interests may conflict with yours.
Our class A common stock has one vote per share, while our class B common stock has ten
votes per share on all matters to be voted on by our stockholders. As of June 30, 2007, Onex
Corporation, its affiliates and our directors and members of our senior management owned shares of
common stock representing over 75.0% of the combined voting power of our outstanding common stock.
Accordingly, Onex Corporation may have the power to control the outcome of matters on which
stockholders are entitled to vote. These include the election and removal of directors, the
adoption or amendment of our certificate of incorporation and bylaws, possible mergers, corporate
control contests and significant transactions. Through its control of the elections to our board of
directors, Onex Corporation may also have the ability to appoint or replace our senior management
and cause us to issue additional shares of our common stock or repurchase common stock, declare
dividends or take other actions. Onex Corporation may make decisions regarding our company and
business that are opposed to our other stockholders interests or with which they disagree. Onex
Corporation may also delay or prevent a change of control of us, even if the change of control
would benefit our other stockholders, which could deprive our other stockholders of the opportunity
to receive a premium for their class A common stock. The significant concentration of stock
ownership and voting power may also adversely affect the trading price of our class A common stock
due to investors perception that conflicts of interest may exist or arise. To the extent that the
interests of our public stockholders are harmed by the actions of Onex Corporation, the price of
our class A common stock may be harmed.
Additionally, Onex Corporation is in the business of making investments in companies and
currently holds, and may from time to time in the future acquire, controlling interests in
businesses engaged in the healthcare industries that complement or directly or indirectly compete
with certain portions of our business. Further, if it pursues such acquisitions in the healthcare
industry, those acquisition opportunities
48
Table of Contents
may not be available to us. We urge you to read the discussions under the headings Principal
and Selling Stockholders and Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions in our
Registration Statement for further information about the equity interests held by Onex
Corporation and members of our senior management.
If our stock price is volatile, purchasers of our class A common stock could incur
substantial losses.
Our stock price is likely to be volatile. The stock market in general often
experiences substantial volatility that is seemingly unrelated to the operating performance of
particular companies. These broad market fluctuations may adversely affect the trading price of our
class A common stock. The price for our class A common stock will be determined in the marketplace
and may be influenced by many factors, including:
| the depth and liquidity of the market for our class A common stock; | ||
| developments generally affecting the healthcare industry; | ||
| investor perceptions of us and our business; | ||
| actions by institutional or other large stockholders; | ||
| strategic actions, such as acquisitions or restructurings, or the introduction of new services by us or our competitors; | ||
| new laws or regulations or new interpretations of existing laws or regulations applicable to our business; | ||
| litigation and governmental investigations; | ||
| changes in accounting standards, policies, guidance, interpretations or principles; | ||
| adverse conditions in the financial markets or general economic conditions, including those resulting from war, incidents of terrorism and responses to such events; | ||
| sales of class B common stock by us or members of our management team; | ||
| additions or departures of key personnel; and | ||
| our results of operations, financial performance and future prospects. |
These and other factors may cause the market price and demand for our class A common
stock to fluctuate substantially, which may limit or prevent investors from readily selling their
shares of class A common stock and may otherwise negatively affect the liquidity of our class A
common stock. In addition, in the past, when the market price of a stock has been volatile, holders
of that stock have instituted securities class action litigation against the company that issued
the stock. If any of our stockholders brought a lawsuit against us, we could incur substantial
costs defending or settling the lawsuit. Such a lawsuit could also divert the time and attention of
our management from our business.
If securities or industry analysts do not publish research or reports about our
business, if they change their recommendations regarding our stock adversely or if our operating
results do not meet their expectations, our stock price and trading volume could decline.
The trading market for our class A common stock will be influenced by the research
and reports that industry or securities analysts publish about us or our business. If one or more
of these analysts cease coverage of our company or fail to publish reports on us regularly, we
could lose visibility in the financial markets, which in turn could cause our stock price or
trading volume to decline. Moreover, if one or more of the analysts who cover us downgrade our
stock or if our operating results do not meet their expectations, our stock price could decline.
We do not intend to pay dividends on our class A common stock.
We do not anticipate paying any cash dividends on our class A common stock in the
foreseeable future. We currently anticipate that we will retain all of our available cash, if any,
for use as working capital and
49
Table of Contents
for other general purposes, including to service our debt and to fund the operation and
expansion of our business. Any payment of future dividends will be at the discretion of our board
of directors and will depend on, among other things, our earnings, financial condition, capital
requirements, level of indebtedness, statutory and contractual restrictions applying to the payment
of dividends and other considerations that our board of directors deems relevant. Investors must
rely on sales of their class A common stock after price appreciation, which may never occur, as the
only way to realize a return on their investment. Investors seeking cash dividends should not
purchase our class A common stock.
Failure to achieve and maintain effective internal controls in accordance with Section
404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act could result in a restatement of our financial statements, cause
investors to lose confidence in our financial statements and our company and have a material
adverse effect on our business and stock price.
We produce our consolidated financial statements in accordance with the
requirements of GAAP, but our internal accounting controls may not currently meet all standards
applicable to companies with publicly traded securities. Effective internal controls are necessary
for us to provide reliable financial reports to help mitigate the risk of fraud and to operate
successfully as a publicly traded company. As a public company, we will be required to document and
test our internal control procedures in order to satisfy the requirements of Section 404 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, or Section 404, which will require annual management assessments of the
effectiveness of our internal controls over financial reporting and a report by our independent
registered public accounting firm that addresses both managements assessments and our internal
controls. This requirement will apply to us starting with our annual report for the year ended
December 31, 2008.
Our fiscal 2006 audit revealed that a significant deficiency existed in the documentation of
our internal control design and that evidence of the functioning and effectiveness of key controls
did not exist for our significant accounts and processes for 2006. In addition, our fiscal 2005
audit revealed a reportable condition in our internal controls over our financial closing and
reporting processes. A reportable condition or a significant deficiency is a control deficiency, or
combination of deficiencies, that adversely affects a companys ability to initiate, authorize,
record, process or report external financial data reliably in accordance with GAAP such that there
is a more than remote likelihood that a misstatement of the companys annual or interim financial
statements that is more than inconsequential will not be prevented or detected. In particular, we
and our independent registered public accounting firm identified numerous post-closing adjustments
to our financial statements as part of our 2005 audit and our 2006 interim review process. In
addition, during our second quarter 2006 closing review, and as we prepared to register the
issuance of our new 11.0% senior subordinated notes in an exchange offer for our private 11.0%
senior subordinated notes, we identified certain accounting errors in our financial statements for
the three years ended December 31, 2005 and the first quarter of 2006. These errors primarily
related to purchase accounting entries made in connection with the Onex transactions. As a result
of discovering these errors, we undertook a further review of our historical financial statements
and identified adjustments to additional accounts. Following this review, our board of directors
and independent registered public accounting firm concluded that an amendment of our annual report
to holders of our 11.0% senior subordinated notes, which included the restatement of our financial
statements for the three years ended December 31, 2005, and an amendment of our quarterly report to
holders of our 11.0% senior subordinated notes for the first quarter of 2006, which included a
restatement of our financial statements therein, was necessary. We are in the process of
remediating the significant deficiency identified above in order to help prevent and detect further
errors in the financial statement closing and reporting process. We are doing this by hiring staff
with the appropriate experience, upgrading our general ledger system to produce timely and accurate
financial information and performing an evaluation of our internal controls and remediating where
necessary. We have implemented many of these measures, and we intend to implement other measures to
improve our internal control over financial reporting. If these measures are insufficient to
address the issues raised, or if we discover additional internal control deficiencies, we may fail
to meet reporting requirements established by the SEC and our reporting obligations under the terms
of our existing or future indebtedness, our financial statements may contain material misstatements
and require restatement and our business and operating results may be harmed.
50
Table of Contents
The restatement of previously issued financial statements could also expose us to legal risk.
The defense of any such actions could cause the diversion of managements attention and resources,
and we could be required to pay damages to settle such actions if any such actions are not resolved
in our favor. Even if resolved in our favor, such actions could cause us to incur
significant legal and other expenses. Moreover, we may be the subject of negative publicity
focusing on the financial statement inaccuracies and resulting restatement and negative reactions
from our stockholders, creditors or others with which we do business. The occurrence of any of the
foregoing could harm our business and reputation and cause the price of our securities, including
our class A common stock, to decline.
As we prepare to comply with Section 404, we may identify significant deficiencies or errors
that we may not be able to remediate in time to meet our deadline for compliance with Section 404.
Testing and maintaining internal controls can divert our managements attention from other matters
that are important to our business. We may not be able to conclude on an ongoing basis that we have
effective internal controls over financial reporting in accordance with Section 404 or our
independent registered public accounting firm may not be able or willing to issue a favorable
assessment if we conclude that our internal controls over financial reporting are effective. If
either we are unable to conclude that we have effective internal controls over financial reporting
or our independent registered public accounting firm is unable to provide us with an unqualified
report as required by Section 404, investors could lose confidence in our reported financial
information and our company, which could result in a decline in the market price of our class A
common stock, and cause us to fail to meet our reporting obligations in the future, which in turn
could impact our ability to raise additional financing if needed in the future.
If we fail to implement the requirements of Section 404 in a timely manner, we may also be
subject to sanctions or investigation by regulatory authorities, such as the SEC or The New York
Stock Exchange.
Complying with the requirements of being a public company may increase our costs ,
strain our resources and distract management, and we may be unable to comply with these
requirements in a cost-effective manner.
As a public company, we are required to comply with laws, regulations and
requirements, certain corporate governance provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as
discussed above, related regulations of the SEC and the requirements of The New York Stock
Exchange. Such compliance will substantially increase our legal, accounting and other expenses,
will occupy a significant amount of the time of our board of directors and management, will require
us to have additional finance and accounting staff, and make some activities more difficult, time
consuming and costly. We also expect these laws, regulations and requirements to make it more
expensive for us to obtain director and officer liability insurance, and we may be required to
accept reduced policy limits and coverage or incur substantially higher costs to obtain the same or
similar coverage. As a result, it may be more difficult for us to attract and retain qualified
persons to serve on our board of directors, and in particular, on our audit committee, or as
officers.
We may also be unable to comply with these requirements in a cost-effective manner. If our
finance and accounting personnel insufficiently support us in fulfilling these requirements, or if
we are unable to hire adequate finance and accounting personnel, we could face significant legal
liability, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of
operations. Further, if we identify any issues in complying with these requirements (for example,
if we or our independent registered public accountants identified a material weakness or
significant deficiency in our internal control over financial reporting), we could incur additional
costs rectifying those issues, and the existence of those issues could adversely affect us, our
reputation or investor perceptions of us.
Substantial future sales of our class A or class B common stock in the public
market may cause the price of our stock to decline.
If our existing stockholders sell substantial amounts of our class A or class B common
stock or the public market perceives that our existing stockholders might sell substantial amounts
of our class A
51
Table of Contents
common stock, the market price of our class A common stock could decline significantly. Such
sales also might make it more difficult for us to sell equity or equity-related securities in the
future at a time and price that we deem appropriate. As of June 30, 2007, we had 19,166,666 shares
of class A common stock and 17,730,928 shares of class B common stock outstanding. All of the
shares of class A common stock sold in our initial public offering are freely tradable without
restriction or further registration under the federal securities laws, unless purchased by our
affiliates, as that term is defined in Rule 144 under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or
the Securities Act. All shares of our class B common stock (which will convert into shares of class
A common stock if transferred to holders other than our current class B stockholders, which
includes Onex Corporation, our management group and certain of their affiliates), will be available
for sale in the public market pursuant to Rules 144, 144(k) and 701 under the Securities Act
beginning on the date when the lock-up agreements between the underwriters for our initial public
offering and certain of our stockholders expire, which we currently expect will be on November 11,
2007, subject to extension under certain circumstances. Additionally, the underwriters may release
all or a portion of these shares subject to lock-up agreements at any time prior to this date.
Moreover, current stockholders holding an aggregate of 17,730,928 shares of class B common
stock (which will convert into shares of class A common stock if transferred to holders other than
our current class B stockholders, which includes Onex Corporation, our management group and certain
of their affiliates), have the right, subject to some conditions, to require us to file a
registration statement with the SEC or include their shares for registration in certain
registration statements that we may file under the Securities Act. Once we register these shares,
they may be freely sold in the public market upon issuance, subject to the lock-up agreements and
the restrictions imposed on our affiliates under Rule 144. We may issue shares of our common stock,
or other securities, from time to time as consideration for future acquisitions and investments. In
the event any such acquisition or investment is significant, the number of shares of our common
stock or the number or aggregate principal amount, as the case may be, of other securities that we
may issue may also be significant. We may also grant registration rights covering those shares or
other securities in connection with any such acquisitions and investments. Any additional capital
raised through the sale of our equity securities may dilute your percentage ownership of us.
We are a controlled company within the meaning of The New York Stock Exchange
rules and, as a result, qualify for and rely on exemptions from certain corporate governance
requirements.
Onex Corporation and its affiliates continue to control a majority of the voting
power of our outstanding common stock and we are a controlled company within the meaning
of The New York Stock Exchange, or the NYSE, corporate governance standards. Under the NYSE rules,
a company of which more than 50% of the voting power is held by another person or group of persons
acting together is a controlled company and may elect not to comply with certain NYSE corporate
governance requirements, including the requirements that:
| a majority of the board of directors consist of independent directors; | ||
| the nominating and corporate governance committee be entirely composed of independent directors with a written charter addressing the committees purpose and responsibilities; | ||
| the compensation committee be entirely composed of independent directors with a written charter addressing the committees purpose and responsibilities; and | ||
| there be an annual performance evaluation of the nominating and corporate governance and compensation committees. |
We elect to be treated as a controlled company and thus utilize these exemptions,
including the exemption for a board composed of a majority of independent directors. In addition,
although we have adopted charters for our audit, nominating and corporate governance and
compensation committees and intend to conduct annual performance evaluations for these committees,
none of these committees are composed entirely of independent directors. We will rely on the
phase-in rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission and The New York Stock Exchange with
respect to the independence of our audit committee. These rules permit us to have an audit
committee that has one member who is independent
52
Table of Contents
upon the effectiveness of the Registration Statement on Form S-1 that we filed with the SEC, a
majority of members that are independent within 90 days thereafter and all members that are
independent within one year thereafter. Accordingly, you may not have the same protections afforded
to stockholders of companies that are subject to all of The New York Stock Exchange corporate
governance requirements.
Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation, bylaws and Delaware law
contain provisions that could discourage transactions resulting in a change in control, which may
negatively affect the market price of our class A common stock.
In addition to the effect that the concentration of ownership by our significant
stockholders may have, our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and our amended and
restated bylaws contain provisions that may enable our management to resist a change in control.
These provisions may discourage, delay or prevent a change in the ownership of our company or a
change in our management, even if doing so might be beneficial to our stockholders. In addition,
these provisions could limit the price that investors would be willing to pay in the future for
shares of our class A common stock. The provisions in our amended and restated certificate of
incorporation or amended and restated bylaws include:
| our board of directors is authorized, without prior stockholder approval, to create and issue preferred stock, commonly referred to as blank check preferred stock, with rights senior to those of our class A common stock and class B common stock; | ||
| advance notice requirements for stockholders to nominate individuals to serve on our board of directors or to submit proposals that can be acted upon at stockholder meetings; provided, that prior to the date that the total number of outstanding shares of our class B common stock is less than 10% of the total number of shares of common stock outstanding, which we refer to as the Transition Date, no such requirement is required for holders of at least 10% of our outstanding class B common stock; | ||
| our board of directors is classified so not all of the members of our board of directors are elected at one time, which may make it more difficult for a person who acquires control of a majority of our outstanding voting stock to replace our directors; | ||
| following the Transition Date, stockholder action by written consent will be prohibited; | ||
| special meetings of the stockholders are permitted to be called only by the chairman of our board of directors, our chief executive officer or by a majority of our board of directors; | ||
| stockholders are not permitted to cumulate their votes for the election of directors; | ||
| newly created directorships resulting from an increase in the authorized number of directors or vacancies on our board of directors will be filled only by majority vote of the remaining directors; | ||
| our board of directors is expressly authorized to make, alter or repeal our bylaws; and | ||
| stockholders are permitted to amend our bylaws only upon receiving at least 66 2/3% of the votes entitled to be cast by holders of all outstanding shares then entitled to vote generally in the election of directors, voting together as a single class. |
After the Transition Date, we will also be subject to the provisions of Section 203
of the Delaware General Corporation Law, which may prohibit certain business combinations with
stockholders owning 15% or more of our outstanding voting stock. These and other provisions in our
amended and rested certificate of incorporation, amended and restated bylaws and Delaware law could
discourage acquisition proposals and make it more difficult or expensive for stockholders or
potential acquirers to obtain control of our board of directors or initiate actions that are
opposed by our then-current board of directors, including delaying or impeding a merger, tender
offer or proxy contest involving us. Any delay or prevention of a change of control transaction or
changes in our board of directors could cause the market price of our class A common stock to
decline.
53
Table of Contents
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
On May 14, 2007, the SEC declared effective our Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No.
333-137897) relating to our initial public offering. The registration statement related to
19,166,666 shares of our common stock, par value $0.001 per share, including shares of common stock
subject to an over-allotment option that selling stockholders granted to the underwriters. On May
15, 2007, we sold 8,333,333 shares of our class A common stock and selling stockholders sold
10,833,333 shares of our class A common stock, each at the initial public offering price of $15.50,
for an aggregate sale price of $297.1 million, settling those sales on May 18, 2007. The managing
underwriters for our initial public offering were Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC, Banc of
America Securities LLC and UBS Securities LLC. Following the sale of the 19,166,666 shares of our
common stock, the offering terminated.
We paid approximately $8.7 million in underwriting discounts and commissions in connection
with the offering of the shares sold on our behalf and the selling stockholders paid underwriting
discounts and commissions of approximately $11.3 million in connection with the shares sold on
their behalf. We also incurred an estimated $3.8 million of other offering expenses, which when
added to the underwriting discounts and commissions paid by us, amounted to total estimated
expenses of approximately $12.5 million. The net offering proceeds to us, after deducting
underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses paid by us, was
approximately $116.8 million. We did not receive any of the proceeds from the offering that were
paid to the selling stockholders.
None of the underwriting discounts and commissions or offering expenses were paid, directly or
indirectly, to any of our directors or officers or their associates or to persons owning 10% or
more of our common stock or to any affiliates of ours. We used all of the net proceeds paid to us
from our initial public offering to redeem $70.0 million aggregate principal amount of our 11%
senior subordinated notes, due January 15, 2014 for an aggregate redemption price, including
accrued interest, of approximately $81.1 million, and used the remaining proceeds to reduce the
outstanding balance of our first lien revolving credit facility.
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
None.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
On April 26, 2007, our stockholders holding a majority of our then outstanding class A
preferred stock and common stock adopted resolutions by written consent in lieu of an annual
meeting authorizing the following matters in connection with our initial public offering:
| the re-election of the following individuals to our board of directors, effective immediately, to serve until the election and qualification of their respective successors: Boyd Hendrickson, Jose Lynch, Robert LeBlanc, Michael Boxer, John Miller, Glenn Schafer and William Scott; | ||
| approval of a Certificate of Amendment to our Restated Certificate of Incorporation to, among other things, increase our authorized capital stock and effect a stock split and a recapitalization; | ||
| approval of our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation, to be effective upon completion of our initial public offering; and | ||
| approval of our 2007 Incentive Award Plan. |
54
Table of Contents
The foregoing written consent was effected in compliance with Section 228 of the General
Corporation Law of the State of Delaware, and was adopted by holders of 15,879.2109 shares of our
class A preferred
stock out of 22,312 shares of class A preferred stock then issued and outstanding, and
15,879.2109 shares of our common stock out of 12,636,079 shares of common stock then issued and
outstanding.
The directors elected pursuant to the foregoing written consent constituted the full board of
directors.
Item 5. Other Information
None.
Item 6. Exhibits
(a) Exhibits.
55
Table of Contents
Number | Description | |
2.1*
|
Agreement of and Plan of Merger, dated as of October 22, 2005, among SHG Acquisition Corp., SHG Holding Solutions, Inc. and Skilled Healthcare Group, Inc (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Companys Registration Statement on Form S-1, No. 333-137897, filed on October 10, 2006). | |
2.2*
|
Amendment No. 1 to Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated October 22, 2005, by and between SHG Holding Solutions, Inc. and Skilled Healthcare Group, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.2 to the Companys Registration Statement on Form S-1, No. 333-137897, filed on October 10, 2006). | |
2.3*
|
Asset Purchase Agreement, dated as of January 31, 2006, by and among Skilled Healthcare Group, Inc., each of the entities listed on Schedule 2.1 thereto, M. Terence Reardon and M. Sue Reardon, individually and as Trustees of the M. Terence Reardon Trust U.T.A. dated June 26, 2003, and M. Sue Reardon and M. Terence Reardon, as Trustees of the M. Sue Reardon Trust U.T.A. dated June 26, 2003 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.3 to the Companys Registration Statement on Form S-1, No. 333-137897, filed on October 10, 2006). | |
2.4*
|
Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of February 7, 2007, by and between SHG Holding Solutions, Inc., and Skilled Healthcare Group, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.4 to the Companys Registration Statement on Form S-1/A, No. 333-137897, filed on February 9, 2007). | |
2.5*
|
Asset Purchase Agreement, dated February 8, 2007, by and among Skilled Healthcare Group, Inc., Raymore Care Center LLC, Blue River Care Center LLC, MLD Healthcare LLC, Blue River Real Estate LLC, MLD Real Estate LLC, Melvin Dunsworth and Raymore Health Care, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.5 to the Companys Registration Statement on Form S-1/A, No. 333-137897, filed on April 23, 2007). | |
2.6+
|
Asset Purchase Agreement, dated as of July 31, 2007, by and among Skilled Healthcare Group, Inc. and certain affiliates of Laurel Healthcare Providers, LLC. | |
3.1*
|
Certificate of Ownership and Merger of Skilled Healthcare Group, Inc., dated February 7, 2007 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1.1 to the Companys Registration Statement on Form S-1/A, No. 333-137897, filed on April 27, 2007). | |
3.2
|
Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Skilled Healthcare Group, Inc. | |
3.3*
|
Amended and Restated Bylaws of Skilled Healthcare Group, Inc., dated April 19, 2007 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.4 to the Companys Registration Statement on Form S-1/A, No. 333-137897, filed on April 27, 2007). | |
4.1*
|
Form of specimen certificate for Skilled Healthcare Group, Inc.s class A common stock (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Companys Registration Statement on Form S-1/A, No. 333-137897, filed on April 27, 2007). | |
4.2*
|
Indenture, dated as of December 27, 2005, by and among SHG Acquisition Corp., Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and certain subsidiaries of Skilled Healthcare Group, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Companys Registration Statement on Form S-1, No. 333-137897, filed on October 10, 2006). | |
4.3*
|
Form of 11% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2014 (included in exhibit 4.1). | |
4.4*
|
Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of December 27, 2005, by and among SHG Acquisition Corp., all the subsidiaries of Skilled Healthcare Group, Inc. listed therein, Credit Suisse First Boston LLC and J.P. Morgan Securities, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to the Companys Registration Statement on Form S-1, No. 333-137897, filed on October 10, 2006). | |
4.5*
|
Investor Stockholders Agreement, dated as of December 27, 2005, among SHG Holding Solutions, Inc., Onex Partners LP and the stockholders listed on the signature pages thereto (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to the Companys Registration Statement on Form S-1, No. 333-137897, filed on October 10, 2006). | |
4.6*
|
Registration Agreement dated as of December 27, 2005, among SHG Holding Solutions, Inc. and the persons listed thereon (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.5 to the Companys Registration |
56
Table of Contents
Number | Description | |
Statement on Form S-1, No. 333-137897, filed on October 10, 2006). | ||
10.1*
|
Skilled Healthcare Group, Inc. 2007 Incentive Award Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Companys Registration Statement on Form S-1/A, No. 333-137897, filed on April 27, 2007). | |
10.2*
|
Form of Indemnification Agreement with Skilled Healthcare Groups directors and executive officers (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10 to the Companys Registration Statement on Form S-1/A, No. 333-137897, filed on April 27, 2007). (1) | |
10.3
|
Instrument of Joinder, dated as of May 11, 2007, by and among Skilled Healthcare Group, Inc., Bank of America, N.A., UBS Loan Finance LLC and Credit Suisse, Cayman Islands Branch. | |
31.1
|
Certification of Principal Executive Officer Required Under Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. | |
31.2
|
Certification of Principal Financial Officer Required Under Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. | |
32
|
Certification of Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer Required Under Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. |
* | Incorporated by reference. | |
+ | The Company has omitted certain schedules and exhibits pursuant to Item 601(b)(2) of Regulation S-K and shall furnish supplementally to the SEC copies of any of the omitted schedules and exhibits upon the SECs request. | |
(1) | Skilled Healthcare Group, Inc. has entered into an indemnification agreement with the following individuals: Boyd Hendrickson, Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and Director; Jose Lynch, President, Chief Operating Officer and Director; John E. King, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer; Roland Rapp, General Counsel, Secretary and Chief Administrative Officer; Mark Wortley, Executive Vice President and President of Ancillary Subsidiaries; Peter A. Reynolds, Senior Vice President, Finance and Chief Accounting Officer; Susan Whittle, Senior Vice President and Chief Compliance Officer; Robert M. Le Blanc, Lead Director; Michael E. Boxer, Director; John M. Miller, Director; Glenn S. Schafer, Director; William C. Scott, Director. |
57
Table of Contents
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
SKILLED HEALTHCARE GROUP, INC. |
||||
Date: August 9, 2007 | /s/ John E. King | |||
John E. King | ||||
Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer and Authorized Signatory) |
/s/ Peter A. Reynolds | ||||
Peter A. Reynolds | ||||
Senior Vice President, Finance and Chief Accounting Officer (Principal Accounting Officer) |
58
Table of Contents
EXHIBIT INDEX
Number | Description | |
2.1*
|
Agreement of and Plan of Merger, dated as of October 22, 2005, among SHG Acquisition Corp., SHG Holding Solutions, Inc. and Skilled Healthcare Group, Inc (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Companys Registration Statement on Form S-1, No. 333-137897, filed on October 10, 2006). | |
2.2*
|
Amendment No. 1 to Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated October 22, 2005, by and between SHG Holding Solutions, Inc. and Skilled Healthcare Group, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.2 to the Companys Registration Statement on Form S-1, No. 333-137897, filed on October 10, 2006). | |
2.3*
|
Asset Purchase Agreement, dated as of January 31, 2006, by and among Skilled Healthcare Group, Inc., each of the entities listed on Schedule 2.1 thereto, M. Terence Reardon and M. Sue Reardon, individually and as Trustees of the M. Terence Reardon Trust U.T.A. dated June 26, 2003, and M. Sue Reardon and M. Terence Reardon, as Trustees of the M. Sue Reardon Trust U.T.A. dated June 26, 2003 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.3 to the Companys Registration Statement on Form S-1, No. 333-137897, filed on October 10, 2006). | |
2.4*
|
Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of February 7, 2007, by and between SHG Holding Solutions, Inc., and Skilled Healthcare Group, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.4 to the Companys Registration Statement on Form S-1/A, No. 333-137897, filed on February 9, 2007). | |
2.5*
|
Asset Purchase Agreement, dated February 8, 2007, by and among Skilled Healthcare Group, Inc., Raymore Care Center LLC, Blue River Care Center LLC, MLD Healthcare LLC, Blue River Real Estate LLC, MLD Real Estate LLC, Melvin Dunsworth and Raymore Health Care, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.5 to the Companys Registration Statement on Form S-1/A, No. 333-137897, filed on April 23, 2007). | |
2.6+
|
Asset Purchase Agreement, dated as of July 31, 2007, by and among Skilled Healthcare Group, Inc. and certain affiliates of Laurel Healthcare Providers, LLC. | |
3.1*
|
Certificate of Ownership and Merger of Skilled Healthcare Group, Inc., dated February 7, 2007 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1.1 to the Companys Registration Statement on Form S-1/A, No. 333-137897, filed on April 27, 2007). | |
3.2
|
Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Skilled Healthcare Group, Inc. | |
3.3*
|
Amended and Restated Bylaws of Skilled Healthcare Group, Inc., dated April 19, 2007 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.4 to the Companys Registration Statement on Form S-1/A, No. 333-137897, filed on April 27, 2007). | |
4.1*
|
Form of specimen certificate for Skilled Healthcare Group, Inc.s class A common stock (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Companys Registration Statement on Form S-1/A, No. 333-137897, filed on April 27, 2007). | |
4.2*
|
Indenture, dated as of December 27, 2005, by and among SHG Acquisition Corp., Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and certain subsidiaries of Skilled Healthcare Group, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Companys Registration Statement on Form S-1, No. 333-137897, filed on October 10, 2006). | |
4.3*
|
Form of 11% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2014 (included in exhibit 4.1). | |
4.4*
|
Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of December 27, 2005, by and among SHG Acquisition Corp., all the subsidiaries of Skilled Healthcare Group, Inc. listed therein, Credit Suisse First Boston LLC and J.P. Morgan Securities, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to the Companys Registration Statement on Form S-1, No. 333-137897, filed on October 10, 2006). | |
4.5*
|
Investor Stockholders Agreement, dated as of December 27, 2005, among SHG Holding Solutions, Inc., Onex Partners LP and the stockholders listed on the signature pages thereto (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to the Companys Registration Statement on Form S-1, No. 333-137897, filed on October 10, 2006). |
59
Table of Contents
Number | Description | |
4.6*
|
Registration Agreement dated as of December 27, 2005, among SHG Holding Solutions, Inc. and the persons listed thereon (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.5 to the Companys Registration Statement on Form S-1, No. 333-137897, filed on October 10, 2006). | |
10.1*
|
Skilled Healthcare Group, Inc. 2007 Incentive Award Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Companys Registration Statement on Form S-1/A, No. 333-137897, filed on April 27, 2007). | |
10.2*
|
Form of Indemnification Agreement with Skilled Healthcare Groups directors and executive officers (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10 to the Companys Registration Statement on Form S-1/A, No. 333-137897, filed on April 27, 2007). (1) | |
10.3
|
Instrument of Joinder, dated as of May 11, 2007, by and among Skilled Healthcare Group, Inc., Bank of America, N.A., UBS Loan Finance LLC and Credit Suisse, Cayman Islands Branch. | |
31.1
|
Certification of Principal Executive Officer Required Under Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. | |
31.2
|
Certification of Principal Financial Officer Required Under Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. | |
32
|
Certification of Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer Required Under Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. |
* | Incorporated by reference. | |
+ | The Company has omitted certain schedules and exhibits pursuant to Item 601(b)(2) of Regulation S-K and shall furnish supplementally to the SEC copies of any of the omitted schedules and exhibits upon the SECs request. | |
(1) | Skilled Healthcare Group, Inc. has entered into an indemnification agreement with the following individuals: Boyd Hendrickson, Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and Director; Jose Lynch, President, Chief Operating Officer and Director; John E. King, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer; Roland Rapp, General Counsel, Secretary and Chief Administrative Officer; Mark Wortley, Executive Vice President and President of Ancillary Subsidiaries; Peter A. Reynolds, Senior Vice President, Finance and Chief Accounting Officer; Susan Whittle, Senior Vice President and Chief Compliance Officer; Robert M. Le Blanc, Lead Director; Michael E. Boxer, Director; John M. Miller, Director; Glenn S. Schafer, Director; William C. Scott, Director. |
60