Genufood Energy Enzymes Corp. - Quarter Report: 2013 June (Form 10-Q)

PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements

GENUFOOD ENERGY ENZYMES CORP.

 (A Development Stage Company)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

NOTE 1- BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Organization and Business Operations

Genufood Energy Enzymes Corp., USA (the “Company” or “GEEC”) was incorporated under the laws of the State of Nevada on June 21, 2010. GEEC is a start-up company and its main focus is to promote market, distribute and export a range of enzyme products for human and animal consumption manufactured in the Unites States for the Asian and ASEAN markets. The Company is the owner of the following trademarks, ProCellax and ProAnilax.  These trademarks and GEEC as a trademark have been filed with the United States Patent and Trademark Office and registered with China (PRC), Hong Kong, Macau, Taiwan and Singapore. Similarly, these trademarks have been filed with the jurisdictions of Thailand, Malaysia, and Sri Lanka.

The Company’s objective is to commence marketing and distribution of American range of enzyme products for human and animal consumption to sole country distributors, wholesalers, dealers and retailers, as well as to the general public following the Company’s Multi-Level Marketing – Franchise Investor Dealer Related (MLM-FIDR) concept, to begin with, in Taiwan, and then to China, Hong Kong, Macau, Thailand, Malaysia, Singapore and Sri Lanka.

On May 24, 2011, GEEC Internet Sales (Private) Limited (“GEECIS”), a wholly owned subsidiary of GEEC, was established in the Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka. GEECIS was established initially to be responsible for GEEC’s internet sales worldwide, but recently its role has been changed to that of a Sole Country Distributor.

 On February 13, 2012 the Company invested and incorporated a wholly owned subsidiary company, GEEC Enzymes (S) Pte Ltd (GESPL) in Singapore with a view to be the Sole Country Distributor for ProCellax and ProAnilax in Singapore. GESPL has started initial test marketing for the range of ProCellax enzymes products.

The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. All significant inter-company accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

The Company is in its development stage with no significant revenues. The Company’s initial operations include organization, capital formation, target markets identification and developing marketing plans.  

The Company’s fiscal year end is September 30.

NOTE 2 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Basis of Presentation

The Company’s unaudited consolidated financial statements included herein have been prepared in accordance with US GAAP and pursuant to the rules of the SEC. The Company believes that the presentations and disclosures herein are adequate for a fair presentation. The unaudited consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of the interim periods presented. These unaudited interim consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements included in its Form 10-K filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission on January 14, 2013. The results of operations for the interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results of operations to be expected for the full year.  

Development Stage Activities

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with ASC 915-10-05, Development Stage Entities. A development - stage company is one in which planned principal operations have not commenced or, if its operations have commenced, but there have been no significant revenues.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America (“US GAAP”) requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period.  Actual results could differ from those estimates.  

Revenue Recognition

Our revenues are generated from sales of enzyme products under our private label.

For sales of enzyme products under our private label – the Company applies paragraph 605-10-S99-1 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for revenue recognition.  The Company recognizes revenue when it is realized or realizable and reduces it for the amount of estimated future doubtful accounts.  The Company considers revenue realized or realizable and earned when all of the following criteria are met: (i) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, (ii) the products have been shipped to the customer, (iii) the sales price is fixed or determinable, and (iv) collectability is reasonably assured.

Foreign Currency Translation and Transactions

The reporting and functional currency of GEEC is the United States Dollar (“U.S. dollar”). The functional currency of GEECIS, a wholly owned subsidiary of GEEC, is the Sri Lanka Rupee (“LKR”). The functional currency of GESPL, a wholly owned subsidiary of GEEC, is the Singapore Dollar (“SGD”).

For financial reporting purposes, the financial statements of the Company’s Sri Lanka subsidiary, which are prepared using the LKR, are translated into the Company’s reporting currency, the U.S. dollar. Assets and liabilities are translated using the exchange rate on the balance sheet date, which was 0.0076 as of June 30, 2013 and 0.0077 as of September 30, 2012, respectively. Revenue and expenses are translated using average exchange rates prevailing during each reporting period.  The average exchange rate of 0.0079 and 0.0075 was used to translate revenues and expenses for the periods ended June 30, 2013 and June 30, 2012, respectively. Stockholders’ equity is translated at historical exchange rates. Adjustments resulting from the translation are recorded as a separate component of accumulated other comprehensive income in stockholders’ equity.

For financial reporting purposes, the financial statements of the Company’s Singapore subsidiary, which are prepared using the SGD, are translated into the Company’s reporting currency, the U.S. dollar. Assets and liabilities are translated using the exchange rate on the balance sheet date, which was 0.7881 as of June 30, 2013 and 0.8145 as of September 30, 2012. Revenue and expenses are translated using average exchange rates prevailing during each reporting period. The 0.8007 average exchange rate was used to translate revenues and expenses for the reporting period ended June 30, 2013. Stockholders’ equity is translated at historical exchange rates. Adjustments resulting from the translation are recorded as a separate component of accumulated other comprehensive income in stockholders’ equity.

Transactions denominated in currencies other than the functional currency are translated into the functional currency at the exchange rates prevailing at the dates of the transactions.  The resulting exchange differences are included in the statements of operations.

No representation is made that the LKR or SGD amounts could have been, or could be converted into U.S. dollar at the above rates.

 
Cash and Cash Equivalents

The Company considers all highly liquid debt instruments with original maturities of three months or less when acquired to be cash equivalents.  The Company places the majority of its cash and cash equivalents with financial institutions that are insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) up to $250,000.  As of June 30, 2013, the Company had $697,732 cash in banks, $364,697 of which with one financial institution, which is $114,697 in excess of FDIC limit. As of September 30, 2012, the Company had $1,166,927 cash in banks, $598,228 and $485,270 of which were with two financial institutions, which is $583,498 in excess of FDIC limit.  The Company mitigates this concentration of credit risk by monitoring the credit worthiness of financial institutions and its customers.  

In October 2008, the Federal government temporarily increased the FDIC insured limits up to a maximum of $250,000 per depositor until January 1, 2014, after which time the insured limits will return to $100,000.

Cash and cash equivalents which are held in foreign banks were $114,471 and $83,429 as of June 30, 2013 and September 30, 2012, respectively. For Singapore’s operation, the Company placed its cash and cash equivalents denominated in Singapore Dollars with financial institutions that are insured by the Singapore Deposit Insurance Corporation (“SDIC”) up to Singapore Dollar 50,000. As of June 30, 2013 and September 30, 2012, $38,162 and $2,566 was insured, respectively. For Sri Lanka’s operation, the Company placed its cash and cash equivalents denominated in Sri Lanka Rupee with financial institutions that are insured by the Sri Lanka Deposit Insurance Scheme (“SLDIS”) up to Sri Lanka Rupee 200,000. As of June 30, 2013 and September 30, 2012, $1,520 and $1,540 was insured, respectively.

Beneficial Conversion Features

From time to time, the Company may issue convertible debt that may have conversion prices that create an embedded beneficial conversion feature pursuant to the Emerging Issues Task Force guidance on beneficial conversion features. A beneficial conversion feature exists on the date a convertible liability is issued when the fair value of the underlying common stock to which the liability is convertible into is in excess of the face value of the liability. In accordance with this guidance, the intrinsic value of the beneficial conversion feature is recorded as a discount on the liability with a corresponding amount to additional paid in capital. The debt discount is amortized to interest expense over the term of the liability using the effective interest method. In cases where the liability relates to amounts owed for direct offering costs of an equity offering, the discount is charged to additional paid in capital with amortization.

Inventories

The Company’s inventories include enzyme products, packaging and labeling materials. Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market value. Cost is determined using the weighted average cost method. As of June 30, 2013 and September 30, 2012, the Company had inventory balances of $197,830 and $93,742, respectively, which was comprised solely of enzyme products, packaging and labeling materials.

Intangible Assets

The Company’s intangible assets consist primarily of trademarks, which are carried at amortized cost.  The company capitalizes filing and legal fees related to the trademark registration. All trademarks have legal lives from 7 to 10 years and are amortized over their respective legal lives upon approval (see Note 5-Trademarks).

The Company reviews its intangible assets for impairment whenever events or circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable.  The Company assesses recoverability by reference to future cash flows from the products underlying these intangible assets.  If these estimates change in the future, the Company may be required to record impairment charges for these assets. As of June 30, 2013, no impairment indicators were prevalent.

Security Deposit Asset

The security deposit is a refundable deposit, lodged with the Sampath Bank, for a facility to receive internet sales funds.  In the event this facility was not obtained and instructions have been given to the Bank to refund the deposit. As of June 30, 2013, GESPL had a balance of $30,491 for refundable security deposit for the lease of retail store and $2,364 for refundable fitting out deposit for the retail store. As of June 30, 2013, GESPL had a balance of $11,822 for refundable security deposit for goods and services tax registration. During the nine months ended June 30, 2013, GESPL paid a deposit of $552 for rent of credit card terminals. As of June 30, 2013, the Company had a balance of $1,652 for a refundable security deposit to a consulting company.

Property, Plant and Equipment

Property, plant and equipment (PP&E) are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. Gains or losses on disposals are recorded in the year of disposal. The cost of improvements that extend the life of property, plant, and equipment are capitalized. These capitalized costs may include structural improvements, equipment, and fixtures. All ordinary repair and maintenance costs are expensed as incurred.

The Company’s PP&E as of June 30, 2013 and September 30, 2012 consisted of computer equipment and software with useful lives of five and three years, respectively. Depreciation is computed using the straight line method over the estimated useful lives.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

FASB ASC Topic 825 – Financial Instruments requires the Company to disclose, when reasonably attainable, the fair market values of its assets and liabilities which are deemed to be financial instruments. The Company's financial instruments consist primarily of cash, prepaid expenses, customer deposit, accounts payable and some other current liabilities. The Company believes that the carrying values of these financial instruments approximate their fair value due to the short-term nature of these items.

As defined in FASB ASC Topic No. 820 – 10 (formerly SFAS 157-Fair Value Measurements), fair value is the price that would be received upon the sale of an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. FASB ASC Topic No. 820 – 10 requires disclosure that establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosure about fair value measurements. The statement requires fair value measurements be classified and disclosed in one of the following categories:

As required by FASB ASC Topic No. 820 – 10, financial assets and liabilities are classified based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The Company’s assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement requires judgment, and may affect the valuation of the fair value of assets and liabilities and their placement within the fair value hierarchy levels.

The Company had no instruments re-measured to fair value on a recurring or non-recurring basis as of June 30, 2013 or September 30, 2012.

Net Earnings (Loss) Per Share

Basic net earnings (loss) per common share are computed by dividing net earnings (loss) by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted net earnings (loss) per common share is determined using the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period, adjusted for the dilutive effect of common stock equivalents. In periods when losses are reported, which is the case for all periods presented in these consolidated financial statements, the diluted weighted-average number of common shares outstanding excludes common stock equivalents because their inclusion would be anti-dilutive. For the nine months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, the company didn't have any potentially dilutive securities.

Stock-Based Compensation

The Company accounts for its stock-based compensation in which the Company obtains employee services in share-based payment transactions under FASB ASC Topic 718, Compensation – Stock Compensation, which requires the Company to expense the cost of employee services received in exchange for an award of equity instruments based on the grant date fair value of such instruments over the vesting period.

The Company also adopted FASB ASC Topic 505-50, Equity-Based Payments to Non-Employees, to account for equity instruments issued to parties other than employees for acquiring goods or services. Such awards for services are recorded at either the fair value of the consideration received or the fair value of the instruments issued in exchange for such services, whichever is more reliably measurable.

No stock based compensation was recorded during the nine months ended June 30, 2013 or June 30, 2012.

Income Taxes

The Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 740, Income Taxes. Under FASB ASC Topic 740, deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on temporary differences between the bases of certain assets and liabilities for income tax and financial reporting purposes. The deferred tax assets and liabilities are classified according to the financial statement classification of the assets and liabilities generating the differences.

The Company maintains a valuation allowance with respect to deferred tax assets. The Company establishes a valuation allowance based upon the potential likelihood of realizing the deferred tax asset and taking into consideration the Company’s financial position and results of operations for the current period. Based upon the level of losses and projections of the future taxable income over the periods in which the deferred tax assets are deductible, a full valuation allowance has been provided as management believes that it is more likely than not, based upon available evidence, that the deferred tax assets will not be realized.

As of June 30, 2013, the Company has a tax receivable balance of $1,240. The tax receivable is related to the goods and services tax (“GST”) refund claimable from Singapore by the Singapore operations for the three months ended June 30, 2013. The Company recorded the amount as a current asset and offset such asset upon receiving refund from the tax authority without impacting revenues or expenses.

Changes in circumstances, such as the Company generating taxable income, could cause a change in judgment about the realizability of the related deferred tax asset. Any change in the valuation allowance will be included in income in the year of the change in estimate.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

New accounting pronouncements are issued by FASB that are adopted by the Company as of the specified date. There have been no developments to recently issued accounting standards, including expected dates of adoption and estimated effects on our financial statements from those disclosed in our previous quarterly report for the period ended March 31, 2013.

NOTE 3 – GOING CONCERN

The Company is a development stage company and has incurred a cumulative net loss since inception of $1,799,847. As of June 30, 2013, the Company had a positive working capital of $847,914, which, however, might be insufficient to finance the Company's business plan for the next twelve months. Due to the start-up nature, the Company expects to incur additional losses in the immediate future. To date, the Company’s cash flow requirements have been primarily met through proceeds received from sales of common stock. The ability of the Company to emerge from the development stage is dependent upon the Company's successful efforts to raise sufficient capital and attain profitable operations.

Management’s plan includes obtaining additional funds by increasing revenues and equity financing through the participation of its country sole distributors, wholesalers, dealers and retailers in the Multi-Level Marketing – Franchise Investor Dealer Related (MLM-FIDR) concept; however there is no assurance of additional funding being available. These circumstances raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The accompanying consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might arise as a result of this uncertainty.

NOTE 4 – PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT

Property, plant and equipment (PP&E) as of June 30, 2013 and September 30, 2012 consisted solely of the computer equipment and software with useful life of 5 and 3 years, respectively. Balances for the PP&E as of June 30, 2013 and September 30, 2012 were as follows:

Depreciation expense for the nine months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 was $2,660 and $553, respectively.

NOTE 5 – TRADEMARKS

The Company filed applications for trademarks on three of its products in their target markets: the United States, Singapore, Thailand, Hong Kong, Taiwan, Macau, Sri Lanka and Malaysia. As of December 31, 2012, the registration for all three products was completed in the United States, China (PRC), Hong Kong, Taiwan, Macau and Singapore, and still pending in other target markets. As of June 30, 2013 and September 30, 2012, the Company capitalized trademark costs of $35,945 and $31,183, respectively. Accumulated amortization at June 30, 2013 and September 30, 2012 was $4,895 and $2,659, respectively. During the nine months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, the Company recorded trademark amortization expense of $2,236 and $2,005. All trademarks have legal lives from 7 to 10 years and are amortized over their respective legal lives upon approval.

NOTE 6 – COMMON STOCK

The total number of shares of capital stock, which the Company shall have authority to issue, is 500,000,000.  These shares consist of one class of 500,000,000 shares designated as common stock at $0.001 par value (“Common Stock”).

Holders of shares of Common Stock shall be entitled to cast one vote for each share held at all stockholders’ meetings for all purposes, including the election of directors.  The Common Stock does not have cumulative voting rights.

Unless there are prior arrangements made and agreed by the Company in writing, no holder of shares of stock of any class shall be entitled as a matter of right to subscribe for, or purchase, or receive any part of any new or additional issue of shares of stock of any class, or of any securities convertible into shares of any class, whether now hereafter authorized or whether issued for money, for consideration other than money, or by way of a dividend.

On July 6, 2010, 150,000,000 shares were issued to a consultant for services directly related to the S-1 registration and offering. These shares were valued at $0.25 per share and recorded as a reduction to additional paid- in capital due to it being an offering cost of the future S-1 offering. As a result of this transaction, additional paid in capital was reduced for the value of the shares equal to $37,500,000. This reduction was offset by recording an increase to common stock according to the par value of the shares issued equal to $150,000, and increasing additional paid in capital by $37,350,000. Due to the offsetting entries to additional paid in capital from the transaction, the net effect on equity was a reduction to additional paid in capital for $150,000 and an increase to the value of common stock for $150,000. In addition to this share issuance, the Company issued an additional 50,000,000 shares to the consultant for offering costs. The 50,000,000 additional shares were issued to convert the $50,000 payable owed to the consulting company (see Note 8).  Through June 30, 2013, the Company paid a total of $345,000 cash to this consultant for offering costs. As of June 30, 2013 nothing additional is owed to the consultant related to the S-1 registration and offering.

On July 6, 2010, the Company received stock subscriptions from investors at various prices;

1.

58,000,000 shares of Common Stock sold to twelve stockholders, at a purchase price of $0.001 per share for cash received  of $58,000,

2.

113,000 shares of Common Stock sold to eleven stockholders at a price of $0.10 for cash received  of $11,300,

3.

106,672 shares of Common Stock sold to sixteen stockholders at a price of $0.15 per share for cash received  of $16,000,

4.

50,000 shares of Common Stock sold to two stockholders at a price of $0.20 per share for cash received  of $10,000,

5.

18,800 shares of Common Stock sold to eight stockholders at a price of $0.25 per share for cash received of $9,700. 

6.

20,000 shares were sold to directors for total consideration of $5,000 on August 9, 2010.

During 2011, pursuant to the terms of the Sole Distributorship Agreement dated October 11, 2010, the Company sold to Taiwan Cell Energy Enzymes Corporation (“TCEEC”) 125,000,000 shares of its common stock at price $0.008 per share for total proceeds of $1,000,000. The value of the shares issued was evaluated and found to be worth more than the cash received at a total value of $1,274,705. The difference of $274,705 represented compensation to the distributor.

The Company considered a third party valuation report to assist with valuing the underlying share issuances associated with the Sole Distributorship Agreement using the weighted discounted cash flow method and discounted market multiple method. The following values represent assumptions and key inputs to this model:

1.

Risk adjusted discount rate – 18.77%

2.

Long-Term growth rate – 12.30%

3.

Discount for lack of marketability – 53.14%

The specific value ascribed to the long term growth rate was based on the expectation of the Company’s consistent long term growth within the current target markets and calculated based on guidance from the Company’s valuation expert regarding industry results for long term growth within the industry. The growth rate used was based on the median historical growth rate of 535 companies selling within emerging markets with businesses related to the following: Food Processing, Retail (Distribution); and Retail (Specialty Lines).  Since the Company believes that there is high demand for its products, it had no reason to think that the Company’s long term growth rate would be below industry benchmarks. Given the Company’s inception stage of operations and strong market demand for its product, the Company believes that the 12.3% growth rate is reasonable and comparable to similar companies within the field.

In December of 2011 the Company’s distributor Taiwan Cell Energy Enzymes Corporation (“TCEEC”) agreed to contribute $279,705 related to subsequent valuations of the shares originally purchased by the distributor for $1,000,000. The Company collected the full $279,705 during the year ended September 30, 2012 inclusive of $5,000 paid to the valuer as professional fees.

During the year ended September 30, 2012 the Company sold 10,000,000 shares for $0.30 per share for total proceeds of $3,000,000. Of this amount, $491,589 was collected during the nine months ended March 31, 2013 and the remaining $1,819,711 was held as a subscription receivable at March 31, 2013. The remaining amount is due in April of 2013 from TCEEC per the related signed promissory note agreement between both parties. On February 27, 2013, the Promissory Note cancelled since TCEEC could not honor. The subscription receivable balance of $1,819,711 was transferred to an existing shareholder and a related party. During the period ended June 30, 2013, $333,779 were collected, therefore the balance of subscription receivable as of June 30, 2013 was $1,485,932.

During the period ended March 31, 2013 the Company signed a Term Sheet with Kodiak Capital Group in respect of a future potential investment of US$3,000,000 to be received in draws by the Company with shares to be granted at a discount to trading prices. The final terms of the agreement were not executed as of March 31, 2013, however with execution of the term sheet the Company was required to pay $15,000 in cash and issue shares worth $150,000. These amounts were recorded as offering costs based on the future prospective offering and accrued for within accounts payable and stock payable as of March 31, 2013. These shares have been issued in May 2013, therefore the balance of stock payable as of June 30, 2013 was zero.

The Company received $625,368 from previously subscribed shares during the nine months ended June 30, 2013.

As of June 30, 2013, $6,020 was accrued and $22,122 was paid as offering costs due to the cost being directly related to the funds raised during the nine months ended June 30, 2013.

NOTE 7 – RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

On August 9, 2010, the Company sold 20,000 shares of common stock at $0.25 a share to its directors for total consideration of $5,000.

The CEO of the Company is the managing director of a consulting company, who provides consulting services for the Company.  In January 2011, the Company converted $50,000 owed to this consulting company into 50,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at the price of $0.001 per share. The $50,000 was recorded as an offering cost when owed due to the cost being directly related to the stock offering. The Company issued this consulting company an additional 150,000,000 shares valued at $150,000 also recorded as offering costs. From inception through September 30, 2011, the Company issued the aforementioned 200,000,000 shares recorded at $200,000 and paid total cash of $345,000 for offering costs. The Company also paid a total $100,000 for consulting services to this company during the year ended September 30, 2011 which was expensed as professional fees.

During the year ended September 30, 2011, the Company’s President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, and director, Mr. Yi Lung Lin paid some operating expenses on behalf of the Company.  The amounts due to him for these expenses were $1,250 and $0 as of June 30, 2013 and September 30, 2012, respectively. 

During the twelve months ended September 30, 2012, the Company paid one of the directors of GEECIS $11,550 for IT consulting services.

During the twelve months ended September 30, 2012, the Company reimbursed one of the directors of GEECIS $8,076 for rent and utilities in Sri Lanka.

On September 21, 2010, the Company entered into a Sole Marketing Agent Agreement with Access Management Consulting and Marketing Pte. Ltd. (“Access Management Consulting”) for the marketing of the Company’s range of enzyme products and to source, select and interview country sole distributors for the distribution of our range of enzyme products to the world at large. The Company’s President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, and director, Mr. Yi Lung Lin, is also the President and Managing Director of Access Management Consulting.

On October 11, 2010, the Company entered into a Sole Distributorship Agreement (General Outlet-Human Consumption) with Taiwan Cell Energy Enzymes Corporation (“TCEEC”) for marketing and distribution of the Company’s enzyme products in the Republic of China (Taiwan). Mr. Chen Wen Hsu, one of the Company’s directors, has voting and investment control over TCEEC. As was provided for under the Sole Distributorship Agreement, during the year ended September 30, 2011, TCEEC had invested in the Company by subscribing to 125,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at a price of $0.008 per share, for total proceeds of $1 million. The value of the shares issued was evaluated and found to be worth more than the cash received at a total value of $1,274,705. The difference of $274,705 represented compensation to the distributor.

During the year ended September 30, 2012 and September 30, 2011, the Company recognized $60,993 and $120,558, respectively, in related party revenue from its customer TCEEC who is controlled by one of the Company’s directors Ken Wen Hsu.

During the nine months ended June 30, 2013 and June 30, 2012, the Company recognized $1,653 and $0, respectively, in related party revenue from Yi Lung Lin who is the President of the Company and Access Management Consulting and Marketing Pte Ltd (AMCM) where Yi Lung Lin is the Managing Director of AMCM.

During the twelve months ended September 30, 2012, the Company collected $279,705 of contribution receivable of capital from its customer TCEEC who is controlled by the Company director Ken Wen Hsu.

During the year ended September 30, 2012, the Company received a total of $850,000 from TCEEC for 2,833,333 shares issued to them during the year then ended. TCEEC owed an additional $2,111,300 to the Company as of September 30, 2012 for 7,037,667 shares issued during the year then ended.

During the year ended September 30, 2012, the Company received a total of $9,000 from Access Equity Capital Management (“AECM”), a company controlled by Mr. Yi Lung Lin, in consideration of 30,000 shares issued to them.

On February 15, 2012 the Board approved the appointment of Access Management Consulting and Marketing Pte Ltd (AMCM) to provide bookkeeping services in replacement of Albeck Financial Services. The Company’s President is also the Managing Director of AMCM.

On September 6, 2012, the Board approved a monthly salary of $5,000 to the Company’s President, Yi Lung Lin commencing September 1, 2012.

On September 24, 2012, NATfresh Beverages has purchased USD$500,000 worth of IPO GEEC shares from the Company. Mr. Yi Lung Lin is the President, CEO, CFO, Treasure, Secretary and Principal Accounting Officer of NATfresh Beverages Corp.

On February 27, 2013, the Promissory Note Agreement entered between the Company and TCEEC was cancelled since TCEEC could not honor. Shares issued in relation to the subscription receivable were cancelled and reissued to AECM and an existing shareholder, both of which have signed a Promissory Note Agreement with the Company respectively to assure the obligation.

During the nine months ended June 30, 2013 the Company paid $37,122 to Access Finance and Securities (NZ) Limited as offering costs.

On March 15, 2013, the Company filed a claim against TCEEC in the United States District Court, District of Nevada for breach of contract pursuant to Clause 13 of the Sole Distributorship Agreement. Total number of the shares at the time of default was 75,000,000. According to the Company’s most recent Form S-1/A filing with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, filed on March 9, 2012, the last subscription agreement the Company signed was at a price of $0.25 per share. At this revised price per share, factoring in: (i) payments actually made, (ii) the fair market value of the remainder of the distribution agreement, and (iii) other costs, the claim is for $17,875,465.

On April 5, 2013, the Company applied to the Nevada Court for an Order (Injunction) to restrain TCEEC from transferring their shares. The court has allowed for the injunction and set April 18, 2013 for hearing.

As of June 30, 2013, and as of September 30, 2012 there were amounts due to related parties of $70,173 and $74,467 respectively.

During the nine months ended June 30, 2013, the Company received a total of $155,000 from TCEEC, $270,368 from an existing shareholder and $200,000 from a related party, respectively for the subscription receivable.

NOTE 8 – COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

On September 21, 2010, the Company reached an agreement with Specialty Enzymes and Biochemicals Co. (BSC Biochemicals), USA (“SEB”) for supplying various types of enzyme product to the Company under the Company’s private label.  SEB has been in operation since 1957 and is the largest enzyme manufacturer and enzymes provider in the US.

During the year ended September 30, 2012, the Company leased a virtual office. The original lease term was from September 1, 2012 through September 30, 2013, and was subject to the annual renewal. On February 23, 2013, the Company entered into a virtual office agreement in Los Angeles. The Agreement is on a month to month basis. One month’s written notification is required by either party to terminate this Agreement. During the year ended September 30, 2012, GESPL entered into a lease agreement for office premises. The lease term was from October 1, 2012 through March 31, 2013. GESPL has the option to renew the lease at the expiration of the lease. During the period ended June 30, 2013 GESPL entered into a memorandum of understanding with a related party for sharing of office premises for three years and a lease agreement with Harmony Convention Holding Pte Ltd for provision of retail shop premises for three years.

                                              
                                                                       Fiscal year end 9/30:

On March 14, 2013 the Company has instructed their Attorney, Atkinson Law Associates P.C. to file a Complaint with the United States District Court, District of Nevada for a civil claim against Taiwan Cell Energy Enzymes Corporation in respect of a breach of contract arising from the Sole Distributorship Agreement (General Outlet – Human Consumption) and Private Placement dated October 11, 2010.  Case 2:13-cv-00435.

NOTE 9 - SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

On July 8, 2013 the Company wrote and notified Taiwan Cell Energy Enzyme Corp (TCEEC) that the Sole Distributorship Agreement (General Outlet-Human Consumption) and Private Placement dated October 11, 2010 has been terminated.

On July 11, 2013, the Company signed the Investment Agreement and Registration Rights Agreement with Kodiak Capital Group, LLC in respect of their investment of US$ 3 million in the businesses of the Company. On July 26, 2013, the Company filed the second Form S-1 with SEC in respect of the investment with Kodiak Capital Group, LLC for the subscription of US $3 million of the shares. On August 8, 2013, the SEC declared the registration statement effective in respect to a US $3 million investment from Kodiak Capital Group, LLC.

On July 14, 2013, the Company opened its first retail chain store by GESPL in Singapore.

Effective August 8, 2013, the name of Company’s wholly owned subsidiary in Sri Lanka was changed from GEEC Internet Sales (Private) Limited to Genufood Enzymes Lanka (Private) Limited.

ITEM 2.  Management Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.  

Safe Harbor Statement

This report on Form 10-Q contains certain forward-looking statements.  All statements other than statements of historical fact are “forward-looking statements” for purposes of these provisions, including any projections of earnings, revenues, or other financial items; any statements of the plans, strategies, and objectives of management for future operation; any statements concerning proposed new products, services, or developments; any statements regarding future economic conditions or performance; statements of belief; and any statement of assumptions underlying any of the foregoing. Such forward-looking statements are subject to inherent risks and uncertainties, and actual results could differ materially from those anticipated by the forward-looking statements.

These forward-looking statements involve significant risks and uncertainties, including, but not limited to, the following: competition, promotional costs, and risk of declining revenues.  Our actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in such forward-looking statements as a result of a number of factors.  These forward-looking statements are made as of the date of this filing, and we assume no obligation to update such forward-looking statements.  The following discusses our financial condition and results of operations based upon our consolidated financial statements which have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.  It should be read in conjunction with our financial statements and the notes thereto included elsewhere herein.

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements, including the notes thereto, appearing elsewhere in this Form 10-Q.  The discussions of results, causes and trends should not be construed to imply any conclusion that these results or trends will necessarily continue into the future.

Overview

We are a start-up company and our main focus is to promote, market, distribute and export enzyme products to the Asian market, to begin with, Taiwan, and then followed by China, Hong Kong, Macau, Thailand, Malaysia, Singapore and Sri Lanka.  These enzyme products are specifically formulated for our marketing and distribution under contract manufacturing arrangements.  There are two contracted OEM manufacturers, one in Taiwan and the other in the United States.  We have contracted with Specialty Enzymes and Biochemicals Co. (Advanced Supplemental Therapies or AST Enzymes) to be our OEM Manufacturer in the United States.  They are located in Chino, California.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

As of June 30, 2013, we had cash and cash equivalents of $697,852 and a working capital surplus of $847,914.  As of June 30, 2013 our accumulated deficit was $1,799,847.  For the nine months ended June 30, 2013 our net loss was $828,765 compared to $242,477 during the same period in 2012.  This increase was due mostly to our increased operations in 2013.

Our loss was funded by proceeds from the sale of our common stock.  During the nine months ended June 30, 2013, we raised in net proceeds $588,246 through financing activities and our cash position decreased by $469,075.  

We used net cash of $1,030,712 in operating activities for the nine months ended June 30, 2013 compared to net cash of $288,725 in operating activities for the same period in 2012.  We used net cash of $10,378 in investing activities for the nine months ended June 30, 2013 compared to $7,147 during the same period in 2012.  The effect of exchange rates on cash was a decrease in cash of $16,231 for the nine months ended June 30, 2013 compared to a decrease of $3,920 during the nine months ended June 30, 2012.

During the nine months ended June 30, 2013 our monthly cash requirement was approximately $114,524, compared to approximately $32,081 for the same period in 2012.

We plan to implement the sole distributorship agreement we had signed and to enter into formal sole distributorship agreement with other country sole distributors.  We plan to promote, market, distribute and export our range of enzyme products to the Asian market, to begin with Taiwan and then to China.

We expect to require a total of approximately $1,763,864 to fully carry out our business plan over the next twelve months beginning September 2013 as set out in this table:

We intend to meet our cash requirements for the next 12 months through external sources: a combination of debt financing and equity financing through private placements.  We are currently not in good short-term financial standing.  We anticipate that we may not generate any revenues in the near future and we will not have enough positive internal operating cash flow until we can generate substantial revenues, which may take the next few years to fully realize.  There is no assurance we will achieve profitable operations.  We have historically financed our operations primarily by cash flows generated from the sale of our equity securities and through cash infusions from officers and outside investors in exchange for debt and/or common stock.

These consolidated financial statements have been prepared on the assumption that we are a going concern, meaning we will continue in operation for the foreseeable future and will be able to realize assets and discharge liabilities in the ordinary course of operations.  Different bases of measurement may be appropriate when a company is not expected to continue operations for the foreseeable future.  Our continuation as a going concern is dependent upon our ability to attain profitable operations and generate funds there-from, and/or raise equity capital or borrowings sufficient to meet current and future obligations.  Management plans to raise equity financings over the next twelve months to finance operations.  There is no guarantee that we will be able to complete any of these objectives.  We have incurred losses from operations since inception and at June 30, 2013, have an accumulated deficit that creates substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.

Results of Operations for the three months ended June 30, 2013 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2012 and from inception to June 30, 2013.

Limited Revenues

Since our inception on June 21, 2010 to June 30, 2013, we have earned limited revenue of $303,191.  As of June 30, 2013, we have an accumulated deficit of $1,799,847 and we did earned revenues of $107,686 during the three months ending on June 30, 2013.  At this time, our ability to generate any significant revenues continues to be uncertain.  Our financial statements contain an additional explanatory paragraph in Note 3, which identifies issues that raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.  Our financial statements do not include any adjustment that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

Net Loss

We incurred a net loss of $172,716 for the three months ended June 30, 2013, compared to a net loss of $116,108 for the same period in 2012.  This increase in net loss is mostly due to increased operating expenses.  From inception on June 21, 2010 to June 30, 2013, we have incurred a net loss of $1,799,847.  Our basic and diluted loss per share was ($0.00) for the three months ended June 30, 2013, and ($0.00) for the same period in 2012.  

Expenses

Our total operating expenses increased from $116,441 to $225,556 for the three months ended June 30, 2013 compared to the same period in 2012.  This increase in expenses is due to higher operating expenses.  Since our inception on June 21, 2010 to June 30, 2013, we have incurred total operating expenses of $1,934,567.

Our professional fees, consisting primarily of legal, accounting and auditing fees, increased by $65,500 to $145,052 for the three months ended June 30, 2013 from $79,552 for the same period in 2012, mainly due to increased legal and auditing services provided in the three month period ended June 30, 2013.  Since our inception on June 21, 2010 until June 30, 2013 we have spent $838,044 on professional fees.

Our rent expenses increased from $11,694 to $19,032 for three months ended June 30, 2013 compared to the same period in 2012.  Since our inception on June 21, 2010 until June 30, 2013 we have spent $89,253 on rent expenses.

Results of Operations for the nine months ended June 30, 2013 compared to the nine months ended June 30, 2012

Revenues

We earned revenues of $121,640 during the nine months ending on June 30, 2013, compared to revenues of $nil during the same period in 2012.  At this time, our ability to generate any significant revenues continues to be uncertain.

Net Loss

We incurred a net loss of $828,765 for the nine months ended June 30, 2013, compared to a net loss of $242,477 for the same period in 2012.  This increase in net loss is due to our increased operations in 2013.  Our basic and diluted loss per share was ($0.00) for the nine months ended June 30, 2013, and ($0.00) for the same period in 2012.  

Expenses

Our total operating expenses increased from $243,434 to $892,898 for the nine months ended June 30, 2013 compared to the same period in 2012.  This increase in expenses is due to higher operating expenses.

Our professional fees, consisting primarily of legal, accounting and auditing fees, increased by $245,102 to $399,289 for the nine months ended June 30, 2013 from $154,187 for the same period in 2012, mainly due to increased legal and auditing services provided in the nine month period ended June 30, 2013.

Our rent expenses increased from $18,166 to $42,021 for the nine months ended June 30, 2013 compared to the same period in 2012.

The amounts presented in the financial statements do not provide for the effect of inflation on our operations or financial position.  The net operating losses shown would be greater than reported if the effects of inflation were reflected either by charging operations with amounts that represent replacement costs or by using other inflation adjustments.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

As of June 30, 2013, we had no off-balance sheet transactions that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in our financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources.

ITEM 3.  Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risks.

Not applicable.

ITEM 4.  Control and Procedures

Not applicable

ITEM 4T.  Control and Procedures.

Disclosure controls and procedures have been designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company is collected and communicated to management to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures.  The Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer have concluded, based on their evaluation as of June 30, 2013 that, as a result of the following material weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting, disclosure controls and procedures were not effective in providing reasonable assurance that material information is made known to them by others within the Company:

(a)    We did not maintain sufficient personnel with an appropriate level of technical accounting knowledge, experience, and training in the application of generally accepted accounting principles commensurate with our complexity and our financial accounting and reporting requirements.  We have limited experience in the areas of financial reporting and disclosure controls and procedures.  Also, we do not have an independent audit committee.  As a result, there is a lack of monitoring of the financial reporting process and there is a reasonable possibility that material misstatements of the consolidated financial statements, including disclosures, will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis; and

(b)    Due to our small size, we do not have a proper segregation of duties in certain areas of our financial reporting process.  The areas where we have a lack of segregation of duties include cash receipts and disbursements, approval of purchases and approval of accounts payable invoices for payment.  This control deficiency, which is pervasive in nature, results in a reasonable possibility that material misstatements of the financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting  

There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2013 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Limitations On The Effectiveness Of Internal Controls

Our management, including our CEO and CFO, does not expect that our disclosure controls and procedures or our internal control over financial reporting will necessarily prevent all fraud and material error.  An internal control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met.  Further, the design of the control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs.  Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the Company have been detected.  These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake.  Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management override of the internal control.  The design of any system of controls also is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions.  Over time, control may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, and/or the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

PART II – OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1.  Legal Proceedings.

We are currently a party to two legal proceedings.  The first legal proceedings is a civil claim we filed on March 14, 2013 in the District Court in the District of Nevada against Taiwan Cell Energy Enzymes Corp (“TCEEC”) for breach of contract under clause 13.3.4.2 of the Sole Distributorship Agreement (General Outlet-Human Consumption) – Case 2:13-cv-00435-RCJ-CWH.  On April 30, 2013, the District Court in the District of Nevada entered a default against TCEEC and on May 17, 2013, a Motion for Default Judgment against TCEEC was filed.  The second legal proceedings, is a criminal complaint we filed on June 21, 2013 with the Taiwan Public Prosecutors Office against Chen Wen Hsu and Pi Lien Peng for breach of fiduciary duty, forgery and fraudulent misrepresentation. 

Our address for service of process in Nevada is 4421 Edward Avenue, Las Vegas, Nevada 89108.

ITEM 2.  Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities.

None.

ITEM 3.  Defaults Upon Senior Securities.

None.

ITEM 4.  Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.

None.

ITEM 5.  Other Information.

None.

ITEM 6.  Exhibits.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on our behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.