GENWORTH FINANCIAL INC - Quarter Report: 2016 March (Form 10-Q)

Large accelerated filer

Accelerated filer

Non-accelerated filer

Smaller reporting company

Form 10-Q

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

x	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2016

¨	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission file number 001-32195

LOGO

GENWORTH FINANCIAL, INC.

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)


Delaware		80-0873306
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)

6620 West Broad Street Richmond, Virginia		23230
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)		(Zip Code)

(804) 281-6000

(Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x

As of April 21, 2016, 498,470,047 shares of Class A Common Stock, par value $0.001 per share, were outstanding.

TABLE OF CONTENTS


	Page
PART I—FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements		3
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of March 31, 2016 (Unaudited) and December 31, 2015		3
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income for the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015 (Unaudited)		4
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015 (Unaudited)		5
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity for the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015 (Unaudited)		6
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015 (Unaudited)		7
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)		8

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations		84

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk		143

Item 4. Controls and Procedures		144

PART II—OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings		145

Item 1A. Risk Factors		145

Item 6. Exhibits		145

Signatures		146

PART I—FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1.

Financial Statements

GENWORTH FINANCIAL, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(Amounts in millions, except per share amounts)


	March 31, 2016			December 31, 2015
	(Unaudited)
Assets
Investments:
Fixed maturity securities available-for-sale, at fair value	$	60,290		$	58,197
Equity securities available-for-sale, at fair value		431			310
Commercial mortgage loans		6,179			6,170
Restricted commercial mortgage loans related to securitization entities		155			161
Policy loans		1,565			1,568
Other invested assets		2,923			2,309
Restricted other invested assets related to securitization entities, at fair value		422			413

Total investments		71,965			69,128
Cash and cash equivalents		4,043			5,965
Accrued investment income		720			653
Deferred acquisition costs		4,235			4,398
Intangible assets and goodwill		291			357
Reinsurance recoverable		17,587			17,245
Other assets		577			520
Deferred tax asset		—			155
Separate account assets		7,624			7,883
Assets held for sale		131			127

Total assets	$	107,173		$	106,431

Liabilities and equity
Liabilities:
Future policy benefits	$	36,776		$	36,475
Policyholder account balances		26,354			26,209
Liability for policy and contract claims		8,177			8,095
Unearned premiums		3,378			3,308
Other liabilities ($42 and $46 of other liabilities are related to securitization entities)		3,596			3,004
Borrowings related to securitization entities ($85 and $81 are at fair value)		173			179
Non-recourse funding obligations		310			1,920
Long-term borrowings		4,232			4,570
Deferred tax liability		449			24
Separate account liabilities		7,624			7,883
Liabilities held for sale		131			127

Total liabilities		91,200			91,794

Commitments and contingencies
Equity:
Class A common stock, $0.001 par value; 1.5 billion shares authorized; 587 million and 586 million shares issued as of March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively; 498 million shares outstanding as of March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015		1			1
Additional paid-in capital		11,952			11,949

Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss):
Net unrealized investment gains (losses):
Net unrealized gains (losses) on securities not other-than-temporarily impaired		2,043			1,236
Net unrealized gains (losses) on other-than-temporarily impaired securities		14			18

Net unrealized investment gains (losses)		2,057			1,254

Derivatives qualifying as hedges		2,302			2,045
Foreign currency translation and other adjustments		(174	)		(289	)

Total accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)		4,185			3,010
Retained earnings		617			564
Treasury stock, at cost (88 million shares as of March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015)		(2,700	)		(2,700	)

Total Genworth Financial, Inc.’s stockholders’ equity		14,055			12,824
Noncontrolling interests		1,918			1,813

Total equity		15,973			14,637

Total liabilities and equity	$	107,173		$	106,431

See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

GENWORTH FINANCIAL, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

(Amounts in millions, except per share amounts)

(Unaudited)


	Three months ended March 31,
	2016			2015
Revenues:
Premiums	$	794		$	1,143
Net investment income		789			781
Net investment gains (losses)		(19	)		(16	)
Policy fees and other income		221			227

Total revenues		1,785			2,135

Benefits and expenses:
Benefits and other changes in policy reserves		860			1,192
Interest credited		177			180
Acquisition and operating expenses, net of deferrals		394			267
Amortization of deferred acquisition costs and intangibles		99			95
Interest expense		105			107

Total benefits and expenses		1,635			1,841

Income before income taxes		150			294
Provision for income taxes		23			91

Income from continuing operations		127			203
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of taxes		(19	)		1

Net income		108			204
Less: net income attributable to noncontrolling interests		55			50

Net income available to Genworth Financial, Inc.’s common stockholders	$	53		$	154

Income from continuing operations available to Genworth Financial, Inc.’s common stockholders per common share:
Basic	$	0.14		$	0.31

Diluted	$	0.14		$	0.31

Net income available to Genworth Financial, Inc.’s common stockholders per common share:
Basic	$	0.11		$	0.31

Diluted	$	0.11		$	0.31

Weighted-average common shares outstanding:
Basic		498.0			497.0

Diluted		499.4			498.9

Supplemental disclosures:
Total other-than-temporary impairments	$	(11	)	$	(3	)
Portion of other-than-temporary impairments included in other comprehensive income (loss)		—			—

Net other-than-temporary impairments		(11	)		(3	)
Other investments gains (losses)		(8	)		(13	)

Total net investment gains (losses)	$	(19	)	$	(16	)

See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

GENWORTH FINANCIAL, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

(Amounts in millions)

(Unaudited)


	Three months ended March 31,
	2016			2015
Net income	$	108		$	204
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of taxes:
Net unrealized gains (losses) on securities not other-than-temporarily impaired		807			323
Net unrealized gains (losses) on other-than-temporarily impaired securities		(4	)		2
Derivatives qualifying as hedges		257			177
Foreign currency translation and other adjustments		216			(370	)

Total other comprehensive income (loss)		1,276			132

Total comprehensive income (loss)		1,384			336
Less: comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests		156			(64	)

Total comprehensive income (loss) available to Genworth Financial, Inc.’s common stockholders	$	1,228		$	400

See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

GENWORTH FINANCIAL, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN EQUITY

(Amounts in millions)

(Unaudited)


	Common stock		Additional paid-in capital		Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)		Retained earnings		Treasury stock, at cost			Total Genworth Financial, Inc.’s stockholders’ equity		Noncontrolling interests			Total equity
Balances as of December 31, 2015	$	1	$	11,949	$	3,010	$	564	$	(2,700	)	$	12,824	$	1,813		$	14,637

Comprehensive income (loss):
Net income		—		—		—		53		—			53		55			108
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of taxes		—		—		1,175		—		—			1,175		101			1,276

Total comprehensive income (loss)													1,228		156			1,384
Dividends to noncontrolling interests		—		—		—		—		—			—		(52	)		(52	)
Stock-based compensation expense and exercises and other		—		3		—		—		—			3		1			4

Balances as of March 31, 2016	$	1	$	11,952	$	4,185	$	617	$	(2,700	)	$	14,055	$	1,918		$	15,973

Balances as of December 31, 2014	$	1	$	11,997	$	4,446	$	1,179	$	(2,700	)	$	14,923	$	1,874		$	16,797

Comprehensive income (loss):
Net income		—		—		—		154		—			154		50			204
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of taxes		—		—		246		—		—			246		(114	)		132

Total comprehensive income (loss)													400		(64	)		336
Dividends to noncontrolling interests		—		—		—		—		—			—		(54	)		(54	)
Stock-based compensation expense and exercises and other		—		1		—		—		—			1		1			2

Balances as of March 31, 2015	$	1	$	11,998	$	4,692	$	1,333	$	(2,700	)	$	15,324	$	1,757		$	17,081

See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

GENWORTH FINANCIAL, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Amounts in millions)

(Unaudited)


	Three months ended March 31,
	2016			2015
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income	$	108		$	204
Less (income) loss from discontinued operations, net of taxes		19			(1	)
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash from operating activities:
Gain on sale of subsidiary		(20	)		—
Amortization of fixed maturity securities discounts and premiums and limited partnerships		(38	)		(21	)
Net investment losses (gains)		19			16
Charges assessed to policyholders		(191	)		(196	)
Acquisition costs deferred		(50	)		(86	)
Amortization of deferred acquisition costs and intangibles		99			95
Deferred income taxes		7			25
Net increase (decrease) in trading securities, held-for-sale investments and derivative instruments		21			18
Stock-based compensation expense		7			(3	)
Change in certain assets and liabilities:
Accrued investment income and other assets		(159	)		(25	)
Insurance reserves		36			443
Current tax liabilities		(8	)		(9	)
Other liabilities, policy and contract claims and other policy-related balances		406			202
Cash from operating activities—held for sale		—			(38	)

Net cash from operating activities		256			624

Cash flows from investing activities:
Proceeds from maturities and repayments of investments:
Fixed maturity securities		840			1,089
Commercial mortgage loans		192			198
Restricted commercial mortgage loans related to securitization entities		6			13
Proceeds from sales of investments:
Fixed maturity and equity securities		905			418
Purchases and originations of investments:
Fixed maturity and equity securities		(2,042	)		(1,802	)
Commercial mortgage loans		(200	)		(247	)
Other invested assets, net		34			(89	)
Policy loans, net		10			—
Cash from investing activities—held for sale		—			54

Net cash from investing activities		(255	)		(366	)

Cash flows from financing activities:
Deposits to universal life and investment contracts		571			630
Withdrawals from universal life and investment contracts		(517	)		(527	)
Redemption of non-recourse funding obligations		(1,620	)		(13	)
Repayment and repurchase of long-term debt		(326	)		—
Repayment of borrowings related to securitization entities		(10	)		(11	)
Dividends paid to noncontrolling interests		(52	)		(54	)
Other, net		13			37
Cash from financing activities—held for sale		—			(27	)

Net cash from financing activities		(1,941	)		35

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents (includes $— and $(4) related to businesses held for sale)		31			(53	)

Net change in cash and cash equivalents		(1,909	)		240
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		5,993			4,918

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period		4,084			5,158
Less cash and cash equivalents held for sale at end of period		41			221

Cash and cash equivalents of continuing operations at end of period	$	4,043		$	4,937

See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

GENWORTH FINANCIAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

(1) Formation of Genworth and Basis of Presentation

Genworth Holdings, Inc. (“Genworth Holdings”) (formerly known as Genworth Financial, Inc.) was incorporated in Delaware in 2003 in preparation for an initial public offering of Genworth common stock, which was completed on May 28, 2004. On April 1, 2013, Genworth Holdings completed a holding company reorganization pursuant to which Genworth Holdings became a direct, 100% owned subsidiary of a new public holding company that it had formed. The new public holding company was incorporated in Delaware on December 5, 2012, in connection with the reorganization, and was renamed Genworth Financial, Inc. (“Genworth Financial”) upon the completion of the reorganization.

The accompanying unaudited condensed financial statements include on a consolidated basis the accounts of Genworth Financial and the affiliate companies in which it holds a majority voting interest or where it is the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity (“VIE”). All intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

References to “Genworth,” the “Company,” “we” or “our” in the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements and these notes thereto are, unless the context otherwise requires, to Genworth Financial on a consolidated basis.

We operate our business through the following five operating segments:

•

U.S. Mortgage Insurance. In the United States, we offer mortgage insurance products predominantly insuring prime-based, individually underwritten residential mortgage loans (“flow mortgage insurance”). We selectively provide mortgage insurance on a bulk basis (“bulk mortgage insurance”) with essentially all of our bulk writings being prime-based.

•

Canada Mortgage Insurance. We offer flow mortgage insurance and also provide bulk mortgage insurance that aids in the sale of mortgages to the capital markets and helps lenders manage capital and risk in Canada.

•

Australia Mortgage Insurance. In Australia, we offer flow mortgage insurance and selectively provide bulk mortgage insurance that aids in the sale of mortgages to the capital markets and helps lenders manage capital and risk.

•

U.S. Life Insurance. We offer long-term care insurance products as well as service traditional life insurance and fixed annuity products in the United States.

•

Runoff. The Runoff segment includes the results of non-strategic products which are no longer actively sold. Our non-strategic products primarily include our variable annuity, variable life insurance, institutional, corporate-owned life insurance and other accident and health insurance products. Institutional products consist of: funding agreements, funding agreements backing notes and guaranteed investment contracts. We no longer offer retail and group variable annuities but continue to service our existing blocks of business.

In addition to our five operating business segments, we also have Corporate and Other activities which include debt financing expenses that are incurred at the Genworth Holdings level, unallocated corporate income and expenses, eliminations of inter-segment transactions and the results of other businesses that are managed outside of our operating segments, including certain smaller international mortgage insurance businesses and discontinued operations.

GENWORTH FINANCIAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

On December 1, 2015, we completed the sale of our lifestyle protection insurance business, which had previously been designated as a non-core business. Prior to its sale, our lifestyle protection insurance business was reported as discontinued operations and its financial position, results of operations and cash flows were separately reported for all periods presented. All prior periods reflected herein have been re-presented on this basis. See note 12 for additional information.

On October 27, 2015, we announced that Genworth Mortgage Insurance Company (“GMICO”), our wholly-owned indirect subsidiary, entered into an agreement to sell our European mortgage insurance business. As the held-for-sale criteria were satisfied during the fourth quarter of 2015, our European mortgage insurance business, included in Corporate and Other activities, has been reported as held for sale and its financial position is separately reported for all periods presented. All prior periods reflected herein have been re-presented on this basis. See note 12 for additional information.

The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements are unaudited and have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“U.S. GAAP”) and rules and regulations of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Preparing financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect reported amounts and related disclosures. Actual results could differ from those estimates. These unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include all adjustments (including normal recurring adjustments) considered necessary by management to present a fair statement of the financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the periods presented. The results reported in these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements should not be regarded as necessarily indicative of results that may be expected for the entire year. The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements included herein should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and related notes contained in our 2015 Annual Report on Form 10-K. Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation.

We have revised our condensed consolidated statement of cash flows previously reported in our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2015 to reflect a correction related to the calculation of the change in reinsurance recoverable that impacted the lines “insurance reserves” and “other liabilities, policy and contract claims and other policy-related balances.” As a result, the change in insurance reserves decreased by $171 million and the change in other liabilities, policy and contract claims and other policy-related balances increased by $171 million. The revisions had no impact on net cash flows from operating activities or the total change in cash and cash equivalents within our condensed consolidated statement of cash flows. Additionally, there was no impact on our unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheet or unaudited condensed consolidated statement of income.

(2) Accounting Changes

Accounting Pronouncement Recently Adopted

On January 1, 2016, we adopted new accounting guidance related to consolidation. The new guidance primarily impacts limited partnerships and similar legal entities, evaluation of fees paid to a decision maker as a variable interest, the effect of fee arrangements and related parties on the primary beneficiary determination and certain investment funds. The adoption of this new guidance did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

GENWORTH FINANCIAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

Accounting Pronouncements Not Yet Adopted

In March 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the “FASB”) issued new accounting guidance related to the accounting for stock compensation. The guidance primarily simplifies the accounting for employee share-based payment transactions, including a new requirement to record all of the income tax effects at settlement or expiration through the income statement, classification of awards as either equity or liabilities, and classification on the statement of cash flows. The guidance is effective for us on January 1, 2017, with early adoption permitted. We are in the process of determining the impact from this guidance on our consolidated financial statements.

In March 2016, the FASB issued new accounting guidance related to transition to the equity method of accounting. The guidance eliminates the retrospective application of the equity method of accounting when obtaining significant influence over a previously held investment. The guidance requires that an entity that has an available-for-sale equity security that becomes qualified for the equity method of accounting recognize through earnings the unrealized holding gain or loss in accumulated other comprehensive income at the date the investment becomes qualified for use of the equity method. The guidance is effective for us on January 1, 2017, with early adoption permitted. We do not expect any significant impact from this guidance on our consolidated financial statements.

In March 2016, the FASB issued new accounting guidance related to the assessment of contingent put and call options in debt instruments. The guidance clarifies the requirements for assessing whether contingent call (put) options that can accelerate the payment of principal on debt instruments are clearly and closely related to their debt hosts. An entity performing the assessment under the amendments in this update is required to assess the embedded call (put) options solely in accordance with the four-step decision sequence. The guidance is effective for us on January 1, 2017, with early adoption permitted. We are in the process of determining the impact from this guidance on our consolidated financial statements.

In March 2016, the FASB issued new accounting guidance related to the effect of derivative contract novations on existing hedge accounting relationships. The guidance clarifies that a change in the counterparty to a derivative instrument that has been designated as the hedging instrument does not, in and of itself, require dedesignation of that hedging relationship provided that all other hedge accounting criteria continue to be met. The guidance is effective for us on January 1, 2017, with early adoption permitted. This guidance is consistent with our accounting for derivative contract novations and, accordingly, we do not expect any impact on our consolidated financial statements.

In February 2016, the FASB issued new accounting guidance related to the accounting for leases. The new guidance generally requires lessees to recognize both a right-to-use asset and a corresponding liability on the balance sheet. The guidance is effective for us on January 1, 2019, with early adoption permitted. We are still in the process of evaluating the impact this guidance will have on our consolidated financial statements.

GENWORTH FINANCIAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

(3) Earnings (Loss) Per Share

Basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share are calculated by dividing each income (loss) category presented below by the weighted-average basic and diluted common shares outstanding for the periods indicated:


	Three months ended March 31,
(Amounts in millions, except per share amounts)	2016			2015
Weighted-average shares used in basic earnings (loss) per common share calculations		498.0			497.0
Potentially dilutive securities:
Stock options, restricted stock units and stock appreciation rights		1.4			1.9

Weighted-average shares used in diluted earnings (loss) per common share calculations		499.4			498.9


Income from continuing operations:
Income from continuing operations	$	127		$	203
Less: income from continuing operations attributable to noncontrolling interests		55			50

Income from continuing operations available to Genworth Financial, Inc.’s common stockholders	$	72		$	153

Basic per common share	$	0.14		$	0.31

Diluted per common share	$	0.14		$	0.31

Income (loss) from discontinued operations:
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of taxes	$	(19	)	$	1
Less: income from discontinued operations, net of taxes, attributable to noncontrolling interests		—			—

Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of taxes, available to Genworth Financial, Inc.’s common stockholders	$	(19	)	$	1

Basic per common share	$	(0.04	)	$	—

Diluted per common share	$	(0.04	)	$	—

Net income:
Income from continuing operations	$	127		$	203
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of taxes		(19	)		1

Net income		108			204
Less: net income attributable to noncontrolling interests		55			50

Net income available to Genworth Financial, Inc.’s common stockholders	$	53		$	154

Basic per common share	$	0.11		$	0.31

Diluted per common share	$	0.11		$	0.31

GENWORTH FINANCIAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

(4) Investments

(a) Net Investment Income

Sources of net investment income were as follows for the periods indicated:


	Three months ended March 31,
(Amounts in millions)	2016			2015
Fixed maturity securities—taxable	$	641		$	632
Fixed maturity securities—non-taxable		3			3
Commercial mortgage loans		81			85
Restricted commercial mortgage loans related to securitization entities		2			4
Equity securities		5			4
Other invested assets		38			40
Restricted other invested assets related to securitization entities		2			1
Policy loans		35			33
Cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments		5			3

Gross investment income before expenses and fees		812			805
Expenses and fees		(23	)		(24	)

Net investment income	$	789		$	781

(b) Net Investment Gains (Losses)

The following table sets forth net investment gains (losses) for the periods indicated:


	Three months ended March 31,
(Amounts in millions)	2016			2015
Available-for-sale securities:
Realized gains	$	16		$	15
Realized losses		(23	)		(12	)

Net realized gains (losses) on available-for-sale securities		(7	)		3

Impairments:
Total other-than-temporary impairments		(11	)		(3	)
Portion of other-than-temporary impairments included in other comprehensive income (loss)		—			—

Net other-than-temporary impairments		(11	)		(3	)

Trading securities		28			6
Commercial mortgage loans		1			2
Net gains (losses) related to securitization entities		8			8
Derivative instruments ⁽¹⁾		(38	)		(32	)

Net investment gains (losses)	$	(19	)	$	(16	)

⁽¹⁾	See note 5 for additional information on the impact of derivative instruments included in net investment gains (losses).

GENWORTH FINANCIAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

We generally intend to hold securities in unrealized loss positions until they recover. However, from time to time, our intent on an individual security may change, based upon market or other unforeseen developments. In such instances, we sell securities in the ordinary course of managing our portfolio to meet diversification, credit quality, yield and liquidity requirements. If a loss is recognized from a sale subsequent to a balance sheet date due to these unexpected developments, the loss is recognized in the period in which we determined that we have the intent to sell the securities or it is more likely than not that we will be required to sell the securities prior to recovery. The aggregate fair value of securities sold at a loss during the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015 was $240 million and $139 million, respectively, which was approximately 91% and 93%, respectively, of book value.

The following represents the activity for credit losses recognized in net income on debt securities where an other-than-temporary impairment was identified and a portion of other-than-temporary impairments was included in other comprehensive income (loss) (“OCI”) as of and for the three months ended March 31:


(Amounts in millions)	2016			2015
Beginning balance	$	64		$	83
Reductions:
Securities sold, paid down or disposed		(1	)		(5	)

Ending balance	$	63		$	78

(c) Unrealized Investment Gains and Losses

Net unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale investment securities reflected as a separate component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) were as follows as of the dates indicated:


(Amounts in millions)	March 31, 2016			December 31, 2015
Net unrealized gains (losses) on investment securities:
Fixed maturity securities	$	4,767		$	3,140
Equity securities		(23	)		(10	)

Subtotal		4,744			3,130
Adjustments to deferred acquisition costs, present value of future profits, sales inducements and benefit reserves		(1,439	)		(1,070	)
Income taxes, net		(1,153	)		(711	)

Net unrealized investment gains (losses)		2,152			1,349
Less: net unrealized investment gains (losses) attributable to noncontrolling interests		95			95

Net unrealized investment gains (losses) attributable to Genworth Financial, Inc.	$	2,057		$	1,254

GENWORTH FINANCIAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

The change in net unrealized gains (losses) on available-for-sale investment securities reported in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) was as follows as of and for the three months ended March 31:


(Amounts in millions)	2016			2015
Beginning balance	$	1,254		$	2,453
Unrealized gains (losses) arising during the period:
Unrealized gains (losses) on investment securities		1,596			943
Adjustment to deferred acquisition costs		(142	)		(98	)
Adjustment to present value of future profits		(34	)		(20	)
Adjustment to sales inducements		(19	)		(15	)
Adjustment to benefit reserves		(174	)		(323	)
Provision for income taxes		(436	)		(162	)

Change in unrealized gains (losses) on investment securities		791			325
Reclassification adjustments to net investment (gains) losses, net of taxes of $(6) and $—		12			—

Change in net unrealized investment gains (losses)		803			325
Less: change in net unrealized investment gains (losses) attributable to noncontrolling interests		—			30

Ending balance	$	2,057		$	2,748

GENWORTH FINANCIAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

(d) Fixed Maturity and Equity Securities

As of March 31, 2016, the amortized cost or cost, gross unrealized gains (losses) and fair value of our fixed maturity and equity securities classified as available-for-sale were as follows:


			Gross unrealized gains				Gross unrealized losses
(Amounts in millions)	Amortized cost or cost		Not other-than- temporarily impaired		Other-than- temporarily impaired		Not other-than- temporarily impaired			Other-than- temporarily impaired			Fair value
Fixed maturity securities:
U.S. government, agencies and government-sponsored enterprises	$	5,389	$	1,135	$	—	$	—		$	—		$	6,524
State and political subdivisions		2,272		262		—		(17	)		—			2,517
Non-U.S. government		1,944		138		—		(2	)		—			2,080
U.S. corporate:
Utilities		3,752		530		—		(13	)		—			4,269
Energy		2,193		85		—		(114	)		—			2,164
Finance and insurance		5,357		476		10		(28	)		—			5,815
Consumer—non-cyclical		3,838		522		—		(6	)		—			4,354
Technology and communications		2,147		175		—		(22	)		—			2,300
Industrial		1,165		82		—		(22	)		—			1,225
Capital goods		1,801		254		—		(5	)		—			2,050
Consumer—cyclical		1,568		135		—		(11	)		—			1,692
Transportation		1,035		105		—		(8	)		—			1,132
Other		362		29		—		(3	)		—			388

Total U.S. corporate		23,218		2,393		10		(232	)		—			25,389

Non-U.S. corporate:
Utilities		1,038		56		—		(10	)		—			1,084
Energy		1,459		48		—		(70	)		—			1,437
Finance and insurance		2,471		154		—		(6	)		—			2,619
Consumer—non-cyclical		735		36		—		(5	)		—			766
Technology and communications		994		59		—		(14	)		—			1,039
Industrial		1,047		32		—		(45	)		—			1,034
Capital goods		594		31		—		(15	)		—			610
Consumer—cyclical		538		10		—		(4	)		—			544
Transportation		561		62		—		(3	)		—			620
Other		2,669		224		—		(17	)		—			2,876

Total non-U.S. corporate		12,106		712		—		(189	)		—			12,629

Residential mortgage-backed		4,716		403		9		(6	)		—			5,122
Commercial mortgage-backed		2,588		133		3		(10	)		(1	)		2,713
Other asset-backed		3,381		12		1		(78	)		—			3,316

Total fixed maturity securities		55,614		5,188		23		(534	)		(1	)		60,290
Equity securities		461		12		—		(42	)		—			431

Total available-for-sale securities	$	56,075	$	5,200	$	23	$	(576	)	$	(1	)	$	60,721

GENWORTH FINANCIAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

As of December 31, 2015, the amortized cost or cost, gross unrealized gains (losses) and fair value of our fixed maturity and equity securities classified as available-for-sale were as follows:


			Gross unrealized gains				Gross unrealized losses
(Amounts in millions)	Amortized cost or cost		Not other-than- temporarily impaired		Other-than- temporarily impaired		Not other-than- temporarily impaired			Other-than- temporarily impaired		Fair value
Fixed maturity securities:
U.S. government, agencies and government-sponsored enterprises	$	5,487	$	732	$	—	$	(16	)	$	—	$	6,203
State and political subdivisions		2,287		181		—		(30	)		—		2,438
Non-U.S. government		1,910		110		—		(5	)		—		2,015
U.S. corporate:
Utilities		3,355		364		—		(26	)		—		3,693
Energy		2,560		103		—		(162	)		—		2,501
Finance and insurance		5,268		392		15		(43	)		—		5,632
Consumer—non-cyclical		3,755		371		—		(30	)		—		4,096
Technology and communications		2,108		123		—		(38	)		—		2,193
Industrial		1,164		53		—		(44	)		—		1,173
Capital goods		1,774		188		—		(12	)		—		1,950
Consumer—cyclical		1,602		95		—		(22	)		—		1,675
Transportation		1,023		75		—		(12	)		—		1,086
Other		385		22		—		(5	)		—		402

Total U.S. corporate		22,994		1,786		15		(394	)		—		24,401

Non-U.S. corporate:
Utilities		815		37		—		(9	)		—		843
Energy		1,700		64		—		(78	)		—		1,686
Finance and insurance		2,327		152		2		(8	)		—		2,473
Consumer—non-cyclical		746		24		—		(18	)		—		752
Technology and communications		978		36		—		(26	)		—		988
Industrial		1,063		19		—		(96	)		—		986
Capital goods		602		19		—		(17	)		—		604
Consumer—cyclical		522		8		—		(4	)		—		526
Transportation		559		52		—		(6	)		—		605
Other		2,574		187		—		(25	)		—		2,736

Total non-U.S. corporate		11,886		598		2		(287	)		—		12,199

Residential mortgage-backed		4,777		330		11		(17	)		—		5,101
Commercial mortgage-backed		2,492		84		3		(20	)		—		2,559
Other asset-backed		3,328		11		1		(59	)		—		3,281

Total fixed maturity securities		55,161		3,832		32		(828	)		—		58,197
Equity securities		325		8		—		(23	)		—		310

Total available-for-sale securities	$	55,486	$	3,840	$	32	$	(851	)	$	—	$	58,507

GENWORTH FINANCIAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

The following table presents the gross unrealized losses and fair values of our investment securities, aggregated by investment type and length of time that individual investment securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position, as of March 31, 2016:


	Less than 12 months							12 months or more							Total
(Dollar amounts in millions)	Fair value		Gross unrealized losses			Number of securities		Fair value		Gross unrealized losses ⁽¹⁾			Number of securities		Fair value		Gross unrealized losses ⁽¹⁾			Number of securities
Description of Securities
Fixed maturity securities:
State and political subdivisions	$	—	$	—			—	$	202	$	(17	)		19	$	202	$	(17	)		19
Non-U.S. government		93		(2	)		17		—		—			—		93		(2	)		17
U.S. corporate		2,610		(141	)		344		1,203		(91	)		167		3,813		(232	)		511
Non-U.S. corporate		1,665		(87	)		209		700		(102	)		102		2,365		(189	)		311
Residential mortgage-backed		349		(2	)		48		104		(4	)		35		453		(6	)		83
Commercial mortgage-backed		331		(8	)		58		113		(3	)		23		444		(11	)		81
Other asset-backed		1,741		(36	)		320		368		(42	)		63		2,109		(78	)		383

Subtotal, fixed maturity securities		6,789		(276	)		996		2,690		(259	)		409		9,479		(535	)		1,405
Equity securities		136		(25	)		170		59		(17	)		29		195		(42	)		199

Total for securities in an unrealized loss position	$	6,925	$	(301	)		1,166	$	2,749	$	(276	)		438	$	9,674	$	(577	)		1,604

% Below cost—fixed maturity securities:
<20% Below cost	$	6,677	$	(229	)		974	$	2,410	$	(127	)		362	$	9,087	$	(356	)		1,336
20%-50% Below cost		110		(44	)		19		272		(120	)		43		382		(164	)		62
>50% Below cost		2		(3	)		3		8		(12	)		4		10		(15	)		7

Total fixed maturity securities		6,789		(276	)		996		2,690		(259	)		409		9,479		(535	)		1,405

% Below cost—equity securities:
<20% Below cost		83		(7	)		152		12		—			6		95		(7	)		158
20%-50% Below cost		53		(18	)		18		47		(17	)		23		100		(35	)		41

Total equity securities		136		(25	)		170		59		(17	)		29		195		(42	)		199

Total for securities in an unrealized loss position	$	6,925	$	(301	)		1,166	$	2,749	$	(276	)		438	$	9,674	$	(577	)		1,604

Investment grade	$	5,974	$	(207	)		892	$	2,362	$	(172	)		357	$	8,336	$	(379	)		1,249
Below investment grade ⁽²⁾		951		(94	)		274		387		(104	)		81		1,338		(198	)		355

Total for securities in an unrealized loss position	$	6,925	$	(301	)		1,166	$	2,749	$	(276	)		438	$	9,674	$	(577	)		1,604

⁽¹⁾	Amounts included $1 million of unrealized losses on other-than-temporarily impaired securities.

⁽²⁾	Amounts that have been in a continuous unrealized loss position for 12 months or more included $1 million of unrealized losses on other-than-temporarily impaired securities.

GENWORTH FINANCIAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

The following table presents the gross unrealized losses and fair values of our corporate securities, aggregated by investment type and length of time that individual investment securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position, based on industry, as of March 31, 2016:


	Less than 12 months							12 months or more							Total
(Dollar amounts in millions)	Fair value		Gross unrealized losses			Number of securities		Fair value		Gross unrealized losses			Number of securities		Fair value		Gross unrealized losses			Number of securities
Description of Securities
U.S. corporate:
Utilities	$	214	$	(9	)		31	$	101	$	(4	)		16	$	315	$	(13	)		47
Energy		961		(83	)		131		171		(31	)		27		1,132		(114	)		158
Finance and insurance		489		(9	)		55		322		(19	)		41		811		(28	)		96
Consumer—non-cyclical		128		(2	)		16		124		(4	)		20		252		(6	)		36
Technology and communications		268		(13	)		36		133		(9	)		18		401		(22	)		54
Industrial		195		(12	)		24		102		(10	)		17		297		(22	)		41
Capital goods		52		(2	)		11		61		(3	)		8		113		(5	)		19
Consumer—cyclical		173		(7	)		22		102		(4	)		12		275		(11	)		34
Transportation		83		(2	)		15		78		(6	)		7		161		(8	)		22
Other		47		(2	)		3		9		(1	)		1		56		(3	)		4

Subtotal, U.S. corporate securities		2,610		(141	)		344		1,203		(91	)		167		3,813		(232	)		511

Non-U.S. corporate:
Utilities		122		(7	)		18		31		(3	)		4		153		(10	)		22
Energy		420		(38	)		43		129		(32	)		23		549		(70	)		66
Finance and insurance		244		(2	)		37		81		(4	)		11		325		(6	)		48
Consumer—non-cyclical		88		(2	)		8		95		(3	)		9		183		(5	)		17
Technology and communications		160		(5	)		14		45		(9	)		8		205		(14	)		22
Industrial		282		(19	)		42		163		(26	)		23		445		(45	)		65
Capital goods		68		(5	)		10		41		(10	)		7		109		(15	)		17
Consumer—cyclical		94		(4	)		10		—		—			—		94		(4	)		10
Transportation		77		(2	)		11		21		(1	)		3		98		(3	)		14
Other		110		(3	)		16		94		(14	)		14		204		(17	)		30

Subtotal, non-U.S. corporate securities		1,665		(87	)		209		700		(102	)		102		2,365		(189	)		311

Total for corporate securities in an unrealized loss position	$	4,275	$	(228	)		553	$	1,903	$	(193	)		269	$	6,178	$	(421	)		822

GENWORTH FINANCIAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

As indicated in the tables above, the majority of the securities in a continuous unrealized loss position for less than 12 months were investment grade and less than 20% below cost. These unrealized losses were primarily attributable to increased market volatility, mostly concentrated in our corporate securities. For securities that have been in a continuous unrealized loss position for less than 12 months, the average fair value percentage below cost was approximately 4% as of March 31, 2016.

Fixed Maturity Securities In A Continuous Unrealized Loss Position For 12 Months Or More

Of the $127 million of unrealized losses on fixed maturity securities in a continuous unrealized loss for 12 months or more that were less than 20% below cost, the weighted-average rating was “BBB” and approximately 81% of the unrealized losses were related to investment grade securities as of March 31, 2016. These unrealized losses were predominantly attributable to corporate securities including fixed rate securities purchased in a lower rate environment and variable rate securities purchased in a higher rate and lower spread environment. The average fair value percentage below cost for these securities was approximately 5% as of March 31, 2016. See below for additional discussion related to fixed maturity securities that have been in a continuous unrealized loss position for 12 months or more with a fair value that was more than 20% below cost.

GENWORTH FINANCIAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

The following tables present the concentration of gross unrealized losses and fair values of fixed maturity securities that were more than 20% below cost and in a continuous unrealized loss position for 12 months or more by asset class as of March 31, 2016:


	Investment Grade
	20% to 50%										Greater than 50%
(Dollar amounts in millions)	Fair value		Gross unrealized losses			% of total gross unrealized losses			Number of securities		Fair value		Gross unrealized losses			% of total gross unrealized losses			Number of securities
Fixed maturity securities:
State and political subdivisions	$	9	$	(3	)		1	%		1	$	—	$	—			—	%		—
U.S. corporate:
Energy		15		(7	)		1			2		—		—			—			—
Finance and insurance		10		(5	)		1			1		—		—			—			—

Total U.S. corporate		25		(12	)		2			3		—		—			—			—

Non-U.S. corporate:
Energy		19		(7	)		1			2		—		—			—			—
Industrial		17		(6	)		1			2		—		—			—			—
Other		6		(1	)		—			1		—		—			—			—

Total non-U.S. corporate		42		(14	)		2			5		—		—			—			—

Structured securities:
Other asset-backed		64		(27	)		5			4		—		—			—			—

Total structured securities		64		(27	)		5			4		—		—			—			—

Total	$	140	$	(56	)		10	%		13	$	—	$	—			—	%		—


	Below Investment Grade
	20% to 50%										Greater than 50%
(Dollar amounts in millions)	Fair value		Gross unrealized losses			% of total gross unrealized losses			Number of securities		Fair value		Gross unrealized losses			% of total gross unrealized losses			Number of securities
Fixed maturity securities:
U.S. corporate:
Energy	$	18	$	(7	)		1	%		5	$	—	$	—			—	%		—
Finance and insurance		7		(3	)		1			1		—		—			—			—
Technology and communications		6		(2	)		—			2		—		—			—			—
Industrial		6		(3	)		1			1		—		—			—			—

Total U.S. corporate		37		(15	)		3			9		—		—			—			—

Non-U.S. corporate:
Utilities		3		(2	)		—			1		—		—			—			—
Energy		45		(22	)		4			9		—		—			—			—
Technology and communications		—		—			—			—		3		(6	)		1			2
Industrial		21		(11	)		2			6		—		—			—			—
Capital goods		3		(2	)		—			1		5		(6	)		1			2
Other		15		(5	)		1			3		—		—			—			—

Total non-U.S. corporate		87		(42	)		7			20		8		(12	)		2			4

Structured securities:
Other asset-backed		8		(7	)		1			1		—		—			—			—

Total structured securities		8		(7	)		1			1		—		—			—			—

Total	$	132	$	(64	)		11	%		30	$	8	$	(12	)		2	%		4

GENWORTH FINANCIAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

For all securities in an unrealized loss position, we expect to recover the amortized cost based on our estimate of the amount and timing of cash flows to be collected. We do not intend to sell nor do we expect that we will be required to sell these securities prior to recovering our amortized cost. See below for further discussion of gross unrealized losses by asset class.

Non-U.S. corporate

As indicated above, $68 million of gross unrealized losses were related to non-U.S. corporate fixed maturity securities that have been in an unrealized loss position for more than 12 months and were more than 20% below cost. Of the total unrealized losses for non-U.S. corporate fixed maturity securities, $29 million, or 43%, related to the energy sector and $17 million, or 25%, related to the industrial sector. Reduced overseas demand for oil and metals has led to a decline in commodities pricing, adversely impacting the fair value of these securities.

We expect that our investments in non-U.S. corporate securities will continue to perform in accordance with our expectations about the amount and timing of estimated cash flows. Although we do not anticipate such events, it is reasonably possible that issuers of our investments in non-U.S. corporate securities may perform worse than current expectations. Such events may lead us to recognize write-downs within our portfolio of non-U.S. corporate securities in the future.

Structured Securities

Of the $34 million of unrealized losses related to structured securities that have been in an unrealized loss position for 12 months or more and were more than 20% below cost, none related to other-than-temporarily impaired securities where the unrealized losses represented the portion of the other-than-temporary impairment recognized in OCI. The extent and duration of the unrealized loss position on our structured securities was primarily due to credit spreads that have widened since acquisition. Additionally, the fair value of certain structured securities has been impacted from high risk premiums being incorporated into the valuation as a result of the amount of potential losses that may be absorbed by the security in the event of additional deterioration in the U.S. economy.

While we consider the length of time each security had been in an unrealized loss position, the extent of the unrealized loss position and any significant declines in fair value subsequent to the balance sheet date in our evaluation of impairment for each of these individual securities, the primary factor in our evaluation of impairment is the expected performance for each of these securities. Our evaluation of expected performance is based on the historical performance of the associated securitization trust as well as the historical performance of the underlying collateral. Our examination of the historical performance of the securitization trust included consideration of the following factors for each class of securities issued by the trust: (i) the payment history, including failure to make scheduled payments; (ii) current payment status; (iii) current and historical outstanding balances; (iv) current levels of subordination and losses incurred to date; and (v) characteristics of the underlying collateral. Our examination of the historical performance of the underlying collateral included: (i) historical default rates, delinquency rates, voluntary and involuntary prepayments and severity of losses, including recent trends in this information; (ii) current payment status; (iii) loan to collateral value ratios, as applicable; (iv) vintage; and (v) other underlying characteristics such as current financial condition.

We use our assessment of the historical performance of both the securitization trust and the underlying collateral for each security, along with third-party sources, when available, to develop our best estimate of cash flows expected to be collected. These estimates reflect projections for future delinquencies, prepayments, defaults and losses for the assets that collateralize the securitization trust and are used to determine the expected

GENWORTH FINANCIAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

cash flows for our security, based on the payment structure of the trust. Our projection of expected cash flows is primarily based on the expected performance of the underlying assets that collateralize the securitization trust and is not directly impacted by the rating of our security. While we consider the rating of the security as an indicator of the financial condition of the issuer, this factor does not have a significant impact on our expected cash flows for each security. In limited circumstances, our expected cash flows include expected payments from reliable financial guarantors where we believe the financial guarantor will have sufficient assets to pay claims under the financial guarantee when the cash flows from the securitization trust are not sufficient to make scheduled payments. We then discount the expected cash flows using the effective yield of each security to determine the present value of expected cash flows.

Based on this evaluation, the present value of expected cash flows was greater than or equal to the amortized cost for each security. Accordingly, we determined that the unrealized losses on each of our structured securities represented temporary impairments as of March 31, 2016.

Despite the considerable analysis and rigor employed on our structured securities, it is reasonably possible that the underlying collateral of these investments may perform worse than current market expectations. Such events may lead to adverse changes in cash flows on our holdings of structured securities and future write-downs within our portfolio of structured securities.

GENWORTH FINANCIAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)


	Less than 12 months							12 months or more							Total
(Dollar amounts in millions)	Fair value		Gross unrealized losses			Number of securities		Fair value		Gross unrealized losses			Number of securities		Fair value		Gross unrealized losses			Number of securities
Description of Securities
Fixed maturity securities:
U.S. government, agencies and government-sponsored enterprises	$	883	$	(16	)		32	$	—	$	—			—	$	883	$	(16	)		32
State and political subdivisions		464		(15	)		81		163		(15	)		17		627		(30	)		98
Non-U.S. government		366		(5	)		49		—		—			—		366		(5	)		49
U.S. corporate		5,836		(332	)		817		466		(62	)		83		6,302		(394	)		900
Non-U.S. corporate		3,016		(170	)		400		486		(117	)		87		3,502		(287	)		487
Residential mortgage-backed		756		(10	)		88		103		(7	)		38		859		(17	)		126
Commercial mortgage-backed		780		(19	)		116		39		(1	)		13		819		(20	)		129
Other asset-backed		1,944		(22	)		349		336		(37	)		55		2,280		(59	)		404

Subtotal, fixed maturity securities		14,045		(589	)		1,932		1,593		(239	)		293		15,638		(828	)		2,225
Equity securities		153		(23	)		64		—		—			—		153		(23	)		64

Total for securities in an unrealized loss position	$	14,198	$	(612	)		1,996	$	1,593	$	(239	)		293	$	15,791	$	(851	)		2,289

% Below cost—fixed maturity securities:
<20% Below cost	$	13,726	$	(472	)		1,877	$	1,259	$	(78	)		238	$	14,985	$	(550	)		2,115
20%-50% Below cost		319		(116	)		54		316		(139	)		50		635		(255	)		104
>50% Below cost		—		(1	)		1		18		(22	)		5		18		(23	)		6

Total fixed maturity securities		14,045		(589	)		1,932		1,593		(239	)		293		15,638		(828	)		2,225

% Below cost—equity securities:
<20% Below cost		133		(18	)		56		—		—			—		133		(18	)		56
20%-50% Below cost		20		(5	)		8		—		—			—		20		(5	)		8

Total equity securities		153		(23	)		64		—		—			—		153		(23	)		64

Total for securities in an unrealized loss position	$	14,198	$	(612	)		1,996	$	1,593	$	(239	)		293	$	15,791	$	(851	)		2,289

Investment grade	$	13,342	$	(524	)		1,834	$	1,245	$	(135	)		225	$	14,587	$	(659	)		2,059
Below investment grade		856		(88	)		162		348		(104	)		68		1,204		(192	)		230

Total for securities in an unrealized loss position	$	14,198	$	(612	)		1,996	$	1,593	$	(239	)		293	$	15,791	$	(851	)		2,289

GENWORTH FINANCIAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)


	Less than 12 months							12 months or more							Total
(Dollar amounts in millions)	Fair value		Gross unrealized losses			Number of securities		Fair value		Gross unrealized losses			Number of securities		Fair value		Gross unrealized losses			Number of securities
Description of Securities
U.S. corporate:
Utilities	$	485	$	(25	)		74	$	14	$	(1	)		7	$	499	$	(26	)		81
Energy		1,162		(134	)		163		131		(28	)		22		1,293		(162	)		185
Finance and insurance		1,142		(35	)		160		94		(8	)		15		1,236		(43	)		175
Consumer—non-cyclical		836		(26	)		107		51		(4	)		10		887		(30	)		117
Technology and communications		658		(36	)		95		23		(2	)		5		681		(38	)		100
Industrial		476		(33	)		64		44		(11	)		9		520		(44	)		73
Capital goods		293		(10	)		48		26		(2	)		4		319		(12	)		52
Consumer—cyclical		427		(18	)		60		63		(4	)		10		490		(22	)		70
Transportation		273		(10	)		38		20		(2	)		1		293		(12	)		39
Other		84		(5	)		8		—		—			—		84		(5	)		8

Subtotal, U.S. corporate securities		5,836		(332	)		817		466		(62	)		83		6,302		(394	)		900

Non-U.S. corporate:
Utilities		130		(6	)		20		32		(3	)		6		162		(9	)		26
Energy		589		(48	)		71		127		(30	)		20		716		(78	)		91
Finance and insurance		478		(7	)		77		30		(1	)		8		508		(8	)		85
Consumer—non-cyclical		261		(14	)		27		37		(4	)		4		298		(18	)		31
Technology and communications		324		(15	)		37		33		(11	)		9		357		(26	)		46
Industrial		495		(54	)		67		110		(42	)		18		605		(96	)		85
Capital goods		154		(8	)		22		41		(9	)		9		195		(17	)		31
Consumer—cyclical		155		(4	)		20		—		—			—		155		(4	)		20
Transportation		147		(6	)		17		—		—			—		147		(6	)		17
Other		283		(8	)		42		76		(17	)		13		359		(25	)		55

Subtotal, non-U.S. corporate securities		3,016		(170	)		400		486		(117	)		87		3,502		(287	)		487

Total for corporate securities in an unrealized loss position	$	8,852	$	(502	)		1,217	$	952	$	(179	)		170	$	9,804	$	(681	)		1,387

GENWORTH FINANCIAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

The scheduled maturity distribution of fixed maturity securities as of March 31, 2016 is set forth below. Actual maturities may differ from contractual maturities because issuers of securities may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties.


(Amounts in millions)	Amortized cost or cost		Fair value
Due one year or less	$	1,861	$	1,879
Due after one year through five years		10,268		10,730
Due after five years through ten years		11,505		11,964
Due after ten years		21,295		24,566

Subtotal		44,929		49,139
Residential mortgage-backed		4,716		5,122
Commercial mortgage-backed		2,588		2,713
Other asset-backed		3,381		3,316

Total	$	55,614	$	60,290

As of March 31, 2016, $8,405 million of our investments (excluding mortgage-backed and asset-backed securities) were subject to certain call provisions.

As of March 31, 2016, securities issued by finance and insurance, utilities and consumer—non-cyclical industry groups represented approximately 22%, 14% and 13%, respectively, of our domestic and foreign corporate fixed maturity securities portfolio. No other industry group comprised more than 10% of our investment portfolio.

As of March 31, 2016, we did not hold any fixed maturity securities in any single issuer, other than securities issued or guaranteed by the U.S. government, which exceeded 10% of stockholders’ equity.

(e) Commercial Mortgage Loans

Our mortgage loans are collateralized by commercial properties, including multi-family residential buildings. The carrying value of commercial mortgage loans is stated at original cost net of principal payments, amortization and allowance for loan losses.

We diversify our commercial mortgage loans by both property type and geographic region. The following tables set forth the distribution across property type and geographic region for commercial mortgage loans as of the dates indicated:


	March 31, 2016						December 31, 2015
(Amounts in millions)	Carrying value			% of total			Carrying value			% of total
Property type:
Retail	$	2,118			34	%	$	2,116			34	%
Industrial		1,582			25			1,562			25
Office		1,527			25			1,516			24
Apartments		445			7			465			8
Mixed use		233			4			234			4
Other		291			5			294			5

Subtotal		6,196			100	%		6,187			100	%

Unamortized balance of loan origination fees and costs		(2	)					(2	)
Allowance for losses		(15	)					(15	)

Total	$	6,179					$	6,170

GENWORTH FINANCIAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)


	March 31, 2016						December 31, 2015
	Carrying			% of			Carrying			% of
(Amounts in millions)	value			total			value			total
Geographic region:
Pacific	$	1,589			26	%	$	1,581			26	%
South Atlantic		1,557			25			1,574			25
Middle Atlantic		874			14			890			14
Mountain		571			9			585			10
West North Central		455			8			416			7
East North Central		382			6			386			6
West South Central		304			5			294			5
New England		269			4			268			4
East South Central		195			3			193			3

Subtotal		6,196			100	%		6,187			100	%

Unamortized balance of loan origination fees and costs		(2	)					(2	)
Allowance for losses		(15	)					(15	)

Total	$	6,179					$	6,170

The following tables set forth the aging of past due commercial mortgage loans by property type as of the dates indicated:


	March 31, 2016
(Amounts in millions)	31 - 60 days past due			61- 90 days past due			Greater than 90 days past due			Total past due			Current			Total
Property type:
Retail	$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	2,118		$	2,118
Industrial		14			—			—			14			1,568			1,582
Office		—			—			5			5			1,522			1,527
Apartments		—			—			—			—			445			445
Mixed use		—			—			—			—			233			233
Other		—			—			—			—			291			291

Total recorded investment	$	14		$	—		$	5		$	19		$	6,177		$	6,196

% of total commercial mortgage loans		—	%		—	%		—	%		—	%		100	%		100	%


	December 31, 2015
(Amounts in millions)	31 - 60 days past due			61 - 90 days past due			Greater than 90 days past due			Total past due			Current			Total
Property type:
Retail	$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	2,116		$	2,116
Industrial		—			—			—			—			1,562			1,562
Office		6			—			5			11			1,505			1,516
Apartments		—			—			—			—			465			465
Mixed use		—			—			—			—			234			234
Other		—			—			—			—			294			294

Total recorded investment	$	6		$	—		$	5		$	11		$	6,176		$	6,187

% of total commercial mortgage loans		—	%		—	%		—	%		—	%		100	%		100	%

GENWORTH FINANCIAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

As of March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, we had no commercial mortgage loans that were past due for more than 90 days and still accruing interest. We also did not have any commercial mortgage loans that were past due for less than 90 days on non-accrual status as of March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015.

We evaluate the impairment of commercial mortgage loans on an individual loan basis. As of March 31, 2016, our commercial mortgage loans greater than 90 days past due included loans with appraised values in excess of the recorded investment and the current recorded investment of these loans was expected to be recoverable.

During the three months ended March 31, 2016 and the year ended December 31, 2015, we modified or extended 5 and 21 commercial mortgage loans, respectively, with a total carrying value of $43 million and $110 million, respectively. All of these modifications or extensions were based on current market interest rates, did not result in any forgiveness in the outstanding principal amount owed by the borrower and were not considered troubled debt restructurings.

The following table sets forth the allowance for credit losses and recorded investment in commercial mortgage loans as of or for the periods indicated:


	Three months ended
	March 31,
(Amounts in millions)	2016		2015
Allowance for credit losses:
Beginning balance	$	15	$	22
Charge-offs		—		(3	)
Recoveries		—		—
Provision		—		1

Ending balance	$	15	$	20

Ending allowance for individually impaired loans	$	—	$	—

Ending allowance for loans not individually impaired that were evaluated collectively for impairment	$	15	$	20

Recorded investment:
Ending balance	$	6,196	$	6,170

Ending balance of individually impaired loans	$	19	$	18

Ending balance of loans not individually impaired that were evaluated collectively for impairment	$	6,177	$	6,152

As of March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, we had an individually impaired commercial mortgage loan included within the office property type with a recorded investment of $5 million, an unpaid principal balance of $6 million and charge-offs of $1 million, which were recorded in the third quarter of 2015. As of March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, we had an individually impaired commercial mortgage loan included within the industrial property type with a recorded investment of $14 million, an unpaid principal balance of $15 million and charge-offs of $1 million, which were recorded in the first quarter of 2014. As of December 31, 2015, this loan had interest income of $1 million.

GENWORTH FINANCIAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

In evaluating the credit quality of commercial mortgage loans, we assess the performance of the underlying loans using both quantitative and qualitative criteria. Certain risks associated with commercial mortgage loans can be evaluated by reviewing both the loan-to-value and debt service coverage ratio to understand both the probability of the borrower not being able to make the necessary loan payments as well as the ability to sell the underlying property for an amount that would enable us to recover our unpaid principal balance in the event of default by the borrower. The average loan-to-value ratio is based on our most recent estimate of the fair value for the underlying property which is evaluated at least annually and updated more frequently if necessary to better indicate risk associated with the loan. A lower loan-to-value indicates that our loan value is more likely to be recovered in the event of default by the borrower if the property was sold. The debt service coverage ratio is based on “normalized” annual net operating income of the property compared to the payments required under the terms of the loan. Normalization allows for the removal of annual one-time events such as capital expenditures, prepaid or late real estate tax payments or non-recurring third-party fees (such as legal, consulting or contract fees). This ratio is evaluated at least annually and updated more frequently if necessary to better indicate risk associated with the loan. A higher debt service coverage ratio indicates the borrower is less likely to default on the loan. The debt service coverage ratio should not be used without considering other factors associated with the borrower, such as the borrower’s liquidity or access to other resources that may result in our expectation that the borrower will continue to make the future scheduled payments.

The following tables set forth the loan-to-value of commercial mortgage loans by property type as of the dates indicated:


	March 31, 2016
(Amounts in millions)	0% - 50%			51% - 60%			61% - 75%			76% - 100%			Greater than 100% ⁽¹⁾			Total
Property type:
Retail	$	765		$	395		$	866		$	83		$	9		$	2,118
Industrial		565			446			502			65			4			1,582
Office		499			301			645			68			14			1,527
Apartments		178			64			193			10			—			445
Mixed use		57			47			125			4			—			233
Other		61			62			168			—			—			291

Total recorded investment	$	2,125		$	1,315		$	2,499		$	230		$	27		$	6,196

% of total		34	%		21	%		40	%		4	%		1	%		100	%

Weighted-average debt service coverage ratio		2.16			1.83			1.56			1.08			0.45			1.80

⁽¹⁾	Included $27 million of loans in good standing, where borrowers continued to make timely payments, with a total weighted-average loan-to-value of 119%.

GENWORTH FINANCIAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)


	December 31, 2015
(Amounts in millions)	0% - 50%			51% - 60%			61% - 75%			76% - 100%			Greater than 100% ⁽¹⁾			Total
Property type:
Retail	$	785		$	417		$	800		$	103		$	11		$	2,116
Industrial		515			478			499			65			5			1,562
Office		493			341			580			83			19			1,516
Apartments		196			66			182			21			—			465
Mixed use		56			48			124			3			3			234
Other		54			55			185			—			—			294

Total recorded investment	$	2,099		$	1,405		$	2,370		$	275		$	38		$	6,187

% of total		34	%		23	%		38	%		4	%		1	%		100	%

Weighted-average debt service coverage ratio		2.13			1.82			1.57			1.12			0.55			1.79

⁽¹⁾	Included $38 million of loans in good standing, where borrowers continued to make timely payments, with a total weighted-average loan-to-value of 123%.

The following tables set forth the debt service coverage ratio for fixed rate commercial mortgage loans by property type as of the dates indicated:


	March 31, 2016
(Amounts in millions)	Less than 1.00			1.00 - 1.25			1.26 - 1.50			1.51 - 2.00			Greater than 2.00			Total
Property type:
Retail	$	66		$	226		$	435		$	880		$	511		$	2,118
Industrial		85			180			214			697			406			1,582
Office		72			105			195			804			351			1,527
Apartments		4			38			70			201			132			445
Mixed use		3			12			28			134			56			233
Other		—			58			145			59			29			291

Total recorded investment	$	230		$	619		$	1,087		$	2,775		$	1,485		$	6,196

% of total		4	%		10	%		17	%		45	%		24	%		100	%

Weighted-average loan-to-value		74	%		64	%		60	%		57	%		43	%		56	%

GENWORTH FINANCIAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)


	December 31, 2015
(Amounts in millions)	Less than 1.00			1.00 - 1.25			1.26 - 1.50			1.51 - 2.00			Greater than 2.00			Total
Property type:
Retail	$	67		$	221		$	433		$	882		$	513		$	2,116
Industrial		94			181			208			672			407			1,562
Office		85			114			265			699			346			1,509
Apartments		6			41			74			199			145			465
Mixed use		3			11			28			135			57			234
Other		—			58			146			60			30			294

Total recorded investment	$	255		$	626		$	1,154		$	2,647		$	1,498		$	6,180

% of total		4	%		10	%		19	%		43	%		24	%		100	%

Weighted-average loan-to-value		74	%		64	%		58	%		58	%		43	%		56	%

As of March 31, 2016, we did not have any floating rate commercial mortgage loans. As of December 31, 2015, we had floating rate commercial mortgage loans of $7 million.

(f) Restricted Commercial Mortgage Loans Related To Securitization Entities

We have a consolidated securitization entity that holds commercial mortgage loans that are recorded as restricted commercial mortgage loans related to securitization entities.

(g) Restricted Other Invested Assets Related To Securitization Entities

We have consolidated securitization entities that hold certain investments that are recorded as restricted other invested assets related to securitization entities. The consolidated securitization entities hold certain investments as trading securities and whereby the changes in fair value are recorded in current period income (loss). The trading securities comprise asset-backed securities, including residual interest in certain policy loan securitization entities and highly rated bonds that are primarily backed by credit card receivables.

(h) Limited Partnerships or Similar Entities

Investments in partnerships or similar entities are generally considered VIEs due to the equity group’s lack of sufficient financial control. Generally, these investments are limited partner or non-managing member equity investments in a widely held fund that is sponsored and managed by a reputable asset manager. We are not the primary beneficiary of any VIE investment in a limited partnership or similar entity. As of March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, the total carrying value of these investments was $155 million and $165 million, respectively. Our maximum exposure to loss is equal to the outstanding carrying value and future funding commitments. We have not contributed, and do not plan to contribute, any additional financial or other support outside of what is contractually obligated.

(5) Derivative Instruments

Our business activities routinely deal with fluctuations in interest rates, equity prices, currency exchange rates and other asset and liability prices. We use derivative instruments to mitigate or reduce certain of these risks. We have established policies for managing each of these risks, including prohibitions on derivatives

GENWORTH FINANCIAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

market-making and other speculative derivatives activities. These policies require the use of derivative instruments in concert with other techniques to reduce or mitigate these risks. While we use derivatives to mitigate or reduce risks, certain derivatives do not meet the accounting requirements to be designated as hedging instruments and are denoted as “derivatives not designated as hedges” in the following disclosures. For derivatives that meet the accounting requirements to be designated as hedges, the following disclosures for these derivatives are denoted as “derivatives designated as hedges,” which include both cash flow and fair value hedges.

GENWORTH FINANCIAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

The following table sets forth our positions in derivative instruments as of the dates indicated:


	Derivative assets					Derivative liabilities
		Fair value					Fair value

(Amounts in millions)	Balance sheet classification	March 31, 2016		December 31, 2015		Balance sheet classification	March 31, 2016		December 31, 2015
Derivatives designated as hedges
Cash flow hedges:
Interest rate swaps	Other invested assets	$	1,087	$	629	Other liabilities	$	68	$	37
Inflation indexed swaps	Other invested assets		—		—	Other liabilities		36		33
Foreign currency swaps	Other invested assets		7		8	Other liabilities		—		—

Total cash flow hedges			1,094		637			104		70

Total derivatives designated as hedges			1,094		637			104		70

Derivatives not designated as hedges
Interest rate swaps	Other invested assets		526		425	Other liabilities		292		183
Interest rate swaps related to securitization entities	Restricted other invested assets		—		—	Other liabilities		35		30
Foreign currency swaps	Other invested assets		—		—	Other liabilities		18		27
Credit default swaps	Other invested assets		1		1	Other liabilities		1		—
Credit default swaps related to securitization entities	Restricted other invested assets		—		—	Other liabilities		6		14
Equity index options	Other invested assets		36		30	Other liabilities		—		—
Financial futures	Other invested assets		—		—	Other liabilities		—		—
Equity return swaps	Other invested assets		2		2	Other liabilities		14		1
Other foreign currency contracts	Other invested assets		7		17	Other liabilities		31		34
GMWB embedded derivatives	Reinsurance recoverable ⁽¹⁾		23		17	Policyholder account balances ⁽²⁾		443		352
Fixed index annuity embedded derivatives	Other assets		—		—	Policyholder account balances ⁽³⁾		345		342
Indexed universal life embedded derivatives	Reinsurance recoverable		—		—	Policyholder account balances ⁽⁴⁾		12		10

Total derivatives not designated as hedges			595		492			1,197		993

Total derivatives		$	1,689	$	1,129		$	1,301	$	1,063

⁽¹⁾	Represents embedded derivatives associated with the reinsured portion of our guaranteed minimum withdrawal benefits (“GMWB”) liabilities.

⁽²⁾	Represents the embedded derivatives associated with our GMWB liabilities, excluding the impact of reinsurance.

⁽³⁾	Represents the embedded derivatives associated with our fixed index annuity liabilities.

⁽⁴⁾	Represents the embedded derivatives associated with our indexed universal life liabilities.

GENWORTH FINANCIAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

The fair value of derivative positions presented above was not offset by the respective collateral amounts retained or provided under these agreements.

The activity associated with derivative instruments can generally be measured by the change in notional value over the periods presented. However, for GMWB, fixed index annuity embedded derivatives and indexed universal life embedded derivatives, the change between periods is best illustrated by the number of policies. The following tables represent activity associated with derivative instruments as of the dates indicated:


(Notional in millions)	Measurement	December 31, 2015		Additions		Maturities/ terminations			March 31, 2016
Derivatives designated as hedges
Cash flow hedges:
Interest rate swaps	Notional	$	11,214	$	—	$	(18	)	$	11,196
Inflation indexed swaps	Notional		571		1		(2	)		570
Foreign currency swaps	Notional		35		—		—			35

Total cash flow hedges			11,820		1		(20	)		11,801

Total derivatives designated as hedges			11,820		1		(20	)		11,801

Derivatives not designated as hedges
Interest rate swaps	Notional		4,932		—		(250	)		4,682
Interest rate swaps related to securitization entities	Notional		67		—		(2	)		65
Foreign currency swaps	Notional		162		17		—			179
Credit default swaps	Notional		144		—		—			144
Credit default swaps related to securitization entities	Notional		312		—		—			312
Equity index options	Notional		1,080		722		(270	)		1,532
Financial futures	Notional		1,331		2,361		(2,187	)		1,505
Equity return swaps	Notional		134		50		(38	)		146
Other foreign currency contracts	Notional		1,656		567		(128	)		2,095

Total derivatives not designated as hedges			9,818		3,717		(2,875	)		10,660

Total derivatives		$	21,638	$	3,718	$	(2,895	)	$	22,461


(Number of policies)	Measurement	December 31, 2015		Additions		Maturities/ terminations			March 31, 2016
Derivatives not designated as hedges
GMWB embedded derivatives	Policies		36,146		—		(717	)		35,429
Fixed index annuity embedded derivatives	Policies		17,482		623		(132	)		17,973
Indexed universal life embedded derivatives	Policies		982		131		(12	)		1,101

Cash Flow Hedges

Certain derivative instruments are designated as cash flow hedges. The changes in fair value of these instruments are recorded as a component of OCI. We designate and account for the following as cash flow hedges when they have met the effectiveness requirements: (i) various types of interest rate swaps to convert floating rate investments to fixed rate investments; (ii) various types of interest rate swaps to convert floating rate

GENWORTH FINANCIAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

liabilities into fixed rate liabilities; (iii) receive U.S. dollar fixed on foreign currency swaps to hedge the foreign currency cash flow exposure of foreign currency denominated investments; (iv) forward starting interest rate swaps to hedge against changes in interest rates associated with future fixed rate bond purchases and/or interest income; (v) forward bond purchase commitments to hedge against the variability in the anticipated cash flows required to purchase future fixed rate bonds; and (vi) other instruments to hedge the cash flows of various forecasted transactions.

The following table provides information about the pre-tax income effects of cash flow hedges for the three months ended March 31, 2016:


(Amounts in millions)	Gain (loss) recognized in OCI		Gain (loss) reclassified into net income from OCI		Classification of gain (loss) reclassified into net income	Gain (loss) recognized in net income⁽¹⁾		Classification of gain (loss) recognized in net income
Interest rate swaps hedging assets	$	457	$	25	Net investment income	$	6	Net investment gains (losses)
Interest rate swaps hedging assets		—		1	Net investment gains (losses)		—	Net investment gains (losses)
Interest rate swaps hedging liabilities		(31)		—	Interest expense		—	Net investment gains (losses)
Inflation indexed swaps		(3)		2	Net investment income		—	Net investment gains (losses)
Foreign currency swaps		(1)		—	Net investment income		—	Net investment gains (losses)

Total	$	422	$	28		$	6

⁽¹⁾	Represents ineffective portion of cash flow hedges as there were no amounts excluded from the measurement of effectiveness.

The following table provides information about the pre-tax income effects of cash flow hedges for the three months ended March 31, 2015:


(Amounts in millions)	Gain (loss) recognized in OCI		Gain (loss) reclassified into net income from OCI		Classification of gain (loss) reclassified into net income	Gain (loss) recognized in net income⁽¹⁾		Classification of gain (loss) recognized in net income
Interest rate swaps hedging assets	$	306	$	19	Net investment income	$	4	Net investment gains (losses)
Interest rate swaps hedging liabilities		(18)		—	Interest expense		—	Net investment gains (losses)
Inflation indexed swaps		11		9	Net investment income		—	Net investment gains (losses)
Foreign currency swaps		3		—	Net investment income		—	Net investment gains (losses)

Total	$	302	$	28		$	4

⁽¹⁾	Represents ineffective portion of cash flow hedges as there were no amounts excluded from the measurement of effectiveness.

GENWORTH FINANCIAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

The following table provides a reconciliation of current period changes, net of applicable income taxes, for these designated derivatives presented in the separate component of stockholders’ equity labeled “derivatives qualifying as hedges,” for the periods indicated:


	Three months ended March 31,
(Amounts in millions)	2016			2015
Derivatives qualifying as effective accounting hedges as of January 1	$	2,045		$	2,070
Current period increases (decreases) in fair value, net of deferred taxes of $(147) and $(107)		275			195
Reclassification to net (income), net of deferred taxes of $10 and $10		(18	)		(18	)

Derivatives qualifying as effective accounting hedges as of March 31	$	2,302		$	2,247

The total of derivatives designated as cash flow hedges of $2,302 million, net of taxes, recorded in stockholders’ equity as of March 31, 2016 is expected to be reclassified to net income in the future, concurrently with and primarily offsetting changes in interest expense and interest income on floating rate instruments and interest income on future fixed rate bond purchases. Of this amount, $72 million, net of taxes, is expected to be reclassified to net income in the next 12 months. Actual amounts may vary from this amount as a result of market conditions. All forecasted transactions associated with qualifying cash flow hedges are expected to occur by 2047. There were immaterial amounts reclassified to net income during the three months ended March 31, 2016 in connection with forecasted transactions that were no longer considered probable of occurring.

Fair Value Hedges

Certain derivative instruments are designated as fair value hedges. The changes in fair value of these instruments are recorded in net income. In addition, changes in the fair value attributable to the hedged portion of the underlying instrument are reported in net income. We designate and account for the following as fair value hedges when they have met the effectiveness requirements: (i) interest rate swaps to convert fixed rate liabilities into floating rate liabilities; (ii) cross currency swaps to convert non-U.S. dollar fixed rate liabilities to floating rate U.S. dollar liabilities; and (iii) other instruments to hedge various fair value exposures of investments.

There were no pre-tax income effects of fair value hedges and related hedged items for the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015.

Derivatives Not Designated As Hedges

We also enter into certain non-qualifying derivative instruments such as: (i) interest rate swaps and financial futures to mitigate interest rate risk as part of managing regulatory capital positions; (ii) credit default swaps to enhance yield and reproduce characteristics of investments with similar terms and credit risk; (iii) equity index options, equity return swaps, interest rate swaps and financial futures to mitigate the risks associated with liabilities that have guaranteed minimum benefits, fixed index annuities and indexed universal life; (iv) interest rate swaps where the hedging relationship does not qualify for hedge accounting; (v) credit default swaps to mitigate loss exposure to certain credit risk; (vi) foreign currency swaps, options and forward contracts to mitigate currency risk associated with non-functional currency investments held by certain foreign subsidiaries

GENWORTH FINANCIAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

and future dividends or other cash flows from certain foreign subsidiaries to our holding company; and (vii) equity index options to mitigate certain macroeconomic risks associated with certain foreign subsidiaries. Additionally, we provide GMWBs on certain variable annuities that are required to be bifurcated as embedded derivatives. We also offer fixed index annuity and indexed universal life products and have reinsurance agreements with certain features that are required to be bifurcated as embedded derivatives.

We also have derivatives related to securitization entities where we were required to consolidate the related securitization entity as a result of our involvement in the structure. The counterparties for these derivatives typically only have recourse to the securitization entity. The interest rate swaps used for these entities are typically used to effectively convert the interest payments on the assets of the securitization entity to the same basis as the interest rate on the borrowings issued by the securitization entity. Credit default swaps are utilized in certain securitization entities to enhance the yield payable on the borrowings issued by the securitization entity and also include a settlement feature that allows the securitization entity to provide the par value of assets in the securitization entity for the amount of any losses incurred under the credit default swap.

The following tables provide the pre-tax gain (loss) recognized in net income for the effects of derivatives not designated as hedges for the periods indicated:


	Three months ended March 31,				Classification of gain (loss) recognized
(Amounts in millions)	2016		2015		in net income
Interest rate swaps	$	15	$	8	Net investment gains (losses)
Interest rate swaps related to securitization entities		(5)		(3)	Net investment gains (losses)
Credit default swaps		(1)		1	Net investment gains (losses)
Credit default swaps related to securitization entities		9		8	Net investment gains (losses)
Equity index options		(3)		(10)	Net investment gains (losses)
Financial futures		7		7	Net investment gains (losses)
Equity return swaps		2		(9)	Net investment gains (losses)
Other foreign currency contracts		(2)		(1)	Net investment gains (losses)
Foreign currency swaps		10		(10)	Net investment gains (losses)
GMWB embedded derivatives		(78)		(16)	Net investment gains (losses)
Fixed index annuity embedded derivatives		3		(7)	Net investment gains (losses)
Indexed universal life embedded derivatives		2		1	Net investment gains (losses)

Total derivatives not designated as hedges	$	(41)	$	(31)

Derivative Counterparty Credit Risk

Most of our derivative arrangements with counterparties require the posting of collateral upon meeting certain net exposure thresholds. For derivatives related to securitization entities, there are no arrangements that

GENWORTH FINANCIAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

require either party to provide collateral and the recourse of the derivative counterparty is typically limited to the assets held by the securitization entity and there is no recourse to any entity other than the securitization entity.

The following table presents additional information about derivative assets and liabilities subject to an enforceable master netting arrangement as of the dates indicated:


	March 31, 2016									December 31, 2015
(Amounts in millions)	Derivatives assets⁽¹⁾			Derivatives liabilities⁽²⁾			Net derivatives			Derivatives assets⁽¹⁾			Derivatives liabilities⁽²⁾			Net derivatives
Amounts presented in the balance sheet:
Gross amounts recognized	$	1,707		$	484		$	1,223		$	1,135		$	320		$	815
Gross amounts offset in the balance sheet		—			—			—			—			—			—

Net amounts presented in the balance sheet		1,707			484			1,223			1,135			320			815
Gross amounts not offset in the balance sheet:
Financial instruments⁽³⁾		(367	)		(367	)		—			(231	)		(231	)		—
Collateral received		(1,128	)		—			(1,128	)		(642	)		—			(642	)
Collateral pledged		—			(182	)		182			—			(263	)		263
Over collateralization		3			68			(65	)		3			174			(171	)

Net amount	$	215		$	3		$	212		$	265		$	—		$	265

⁽¹⁾	Included $41 million and $24 million of accruals on derivatives classified as other assets and does not include amounts related to embedded derivatives as of March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively.

⁽²⁾	Included $24 million and $6 million of accruals on derivatives classified as other liabilities and does not include amounts related to embedded derivatives and derivatives related to securitization entities as of March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively.

⁽³⁾	Amounts represent derivative assets and/or liabilities that are presented gross within the balance sheet but are held with the same counterparty where we have a master netting arrangement. This adjustment results in presenting the net asset and net liability position for each counterparty.

Except for derivatives related to securitization entities, almost all of our master swap agreements contain credit downgrade provisions that allow either party to assign or terminate derivative transactions if the other party’s long-term unsecured debt rating or financial strength rating is below the limit defined in the applicable agreement. As a result of the credit rating downgrades of Genworth Holdings and our life insurance subsidiaries in February 2016, we could have claimed up to $215 million, or could have been required to disburse up to $3 million as of March 31, 2016. If the downgrade provisions had been triggered as of December 31, 2015, we could have claimed up to $265 million. The chart above excludes embedded derivatives and derivatives related to securitization entities as those derivatives are not subject to master netting arrangements.

Credit Derivatives

We sell protection under single name credit default swaps and credit default swap index tranches in combination with purchasing securities to replicate characteristics of similar investments based on the credit quality and term of the credit default swap. Credit default triggers for both indexed reference entities and single

GENWORTH FINANCIAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

name reference entities follow the Credit Derivatives Physical Settlement Matrix published by the International Swaps and Derivatives Association. Under these terms, credit default triggers are defined as bankruptcy, failure to pay or restructuring, if applicable. Our maximum exposure to credit loss equals the notional value for credit default swaps. In the event of default for credit default swaps, we are typically required to pay the protection holder the full notional value less a recovery rate determined at auction.

In addition to the credit derivatives discussed above, we also have credit derivative instruments related to securitization entities that we consolidate. These derivatives represent a customized index of reference entities with specified attachment points for certain derivatives. The credit default triggers are similar to those described above. In the event of default, the securitization entity will provide the counterparty with the par value of assets held in the securitization entity for the amount of incurred loss on the credit default swap. The maximum exposure to loss for the securitization entity is the notional value of the derivatives. Certain losses on these credit default swaps would be absorbed by the third-party noteholders of the securitization entity and the remaining losses on the credit default swaps would be absorbed by our portion of the notes issued by the securitization entity.

The following table sets forth our credit default swaps where we sell protection on single name reference entities and the fair values as of the dates indicated:


	March 31, 2016						December 31, 2015
(Amounts in millions)	Notional value		Assets		Liabilities		Notional value		Assets		Liabilities
Investment grade
Matures in less than one year	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—
Matures after one year through five years		39		—		1		39		—		—

Total credit default swaps on single name reference entities	$	39	$	—	$	1	$	39	$	—	$	—

The following table sets forth our credit default swaps where we sell protection on credit default swap index tranches and the fair values as of the dates indicated:


	March 31, 2016						December 31, 2015
(Amounts in millions)	Notional value		Assets		Liabilities		Notional value		Assets		Liabilities
Original index tranche attachment/detachment point and maturity:
7% - 15% matures in less than one year ⁽¹⁾	$	100	$	1	$	—	$	100	$	1	$	—

Total credit default swap index tranches		100		1		—		100		1		—

Customized credit default swap index tranches related to securitization entities:
Portion backing third-party borrowings maturing 2017 ⁽²⁾		12		—		2		12		—		2
Portion backing our interest maturing 2017 ⁽³⁾		300		—		4		300		—		12

Total customized credit default swap index tranches related to securitization entities		312		—		6		312		—		14

Total credit default swaps on index tranches	$	412	$	1	$	6	$	412	$	1	$	14

⁽¹⁾	The current attachment/detachment as of March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015 was 7% – 15%.

⁽²⁾	Original notional value was $39 million.

⁽³⁾	Original notional value was $300 million.

GENWORTH FINANCIAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

(6) Fair Value of Financial Instruments

Assets and liabilities that are reflected in the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements at fair value are not included in the following disclosure of fair value. Such items include cash and cash equivalents, investment securities, separate accounts, securities held as collateral and derivative instruments. Other financial assets and liabilities—those not carried at fair value—are discussed below. Apart from certain of our borrowings and certain marketable securities, few of the instruments discussed below are actively traded and their fair values must often be determined using models. The fair value estimates are made at a specific point in time, based upon available market information and judgments about the financial instruments, including estimates of the timing and amount of expected future cash flows and the credit standing of counterparties. Such estimates do not reflect any premium or discount that could result from offering for sale at one time our entire holdings of a particular financial instrument, nor do they consider the tax impact of the realization of unrealized gains or losses. In many cases, the fair value estimates cannot be substantiated by comparison to independent markets.

The basis on which we estimate fair value is as follows:

Commercial mortgage loans. Based on recent transactions and/or discounted future cash flows, using current market rates. Given the limited availability of data related to transactions for similar instruments, we typically classify these loans as Level 3.

Restricted commercial mortgage loans. Based on recent transactions and/or discounted future cash flows, using current market rates. Given the limited availability of data related to transactions for similar instruments, we typically classify these loans as Level 3.

Other invested assets. Primarily represents short-term investments and limited partnerships accounted for under the cost method. The fair value of short-term investments typically does not include significant unobservable inputs and approximate our amortized cost basis. As a result, short-term investments are classified as Level 2. Limited partnerships are valued based on comparable market transactions, discounted future cash flows, quoted market prices and/or estimates using the most recent data available for the underlying instrument. Cost method limited partnerships typically include significant unobservable inputs as a result of being relatively illiquid with limited market activity for similar instruments and are classified as Level 3.

Long-term borrowings. We utilize available market data when determining fair value of long-term borrowings issued in the United States and Canada, which includes data on recent trades for the same or similar financial instruments. Accordingly, these instruments are classified as Level 2 measurements. In cases where market data is not available such as our long-term borrowings in Australia, we use broker quotes for which we consider the valuation methodology utilized by the third party, but the valuation typically includes significant unobservable inputs. Accordingly, we classify these borrowings where fair value is based on our consideration of broker quotes as Level 3 measurements.

Non-recourse funding obligations. We use an internal model to determine fair value using the current floating rate coupon and expected life/final maturity of the instrument discounted using the floating rate index and current market spread assumption, which is estimated based on recent transactions for these instruments or similar instruments as well as other market information or broker provided data. Given these instruments are private and very little market activity exists, our current market spread assumption is considered to have significant unobservable inputs in calculating fair value and, therefore, results in the fair value of these instruments being classified as Level 3.

GENWORTH FINANCIAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

Borrowings related to securitization entities. Based on market quotes or comparable market transactions. Some of these borrowings are publicly traded debt securities and are classified as Level 2. Certain borrowings are not publicly traded and are classified as Level 3.

Investment contracts. Based on expected future cash flows, discounted at current market rates for annuity contracts or institutional products. Given the significant unobservable inputs associated with policyholder behavior and current market rate assumptions used to discount the expected future cash flows, we classify these instruments as Level 3 except for certain funding agreement-backed notes that are traded in the marketplace as a security and are classified as Level 2.

The following represents our estimated fair value of financial assets and liabilities that are not required to be carried at fair value as of the dates indicated:


	March 31, 2016
	Notional amount			Carrying amount		Fair value
(Amounts in millions)	Notional amount			Carrying amount		Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
Assets:
Commercial mortgage loans	$		⁽¹⁾	$	6,179	$	6,542	$	—	$	—	$	6,542
Restricted commercial mortgage loans			⁽¹⁾		155		174		—		—		174
Other invested assets			⁽¹⁾		247		253		—		174		79
Liabilities:
Long-term borrowings ⁽²⁾			⁽¹⁾		4,232		3,260		—		3,079		181
Non-recourse funding obligations ⁽²⁾			⁽¹⁾		310		178		—		—		178
Borrowings related to securitization entities			⁽¹⁾		88		93		—		93		—
Investment contracts			⁽¹⁾		17,365		18,456		—		5		18,451
Other firm commitments:
Commitments to fund limited partnerships		143			—		—		—		—		—
Ordinary course of business lending commitments		91			—		—		—		—		—


	December 31, 2015
	Notional amount			Carrying amount		Fair value
(Amounts in millions)	Notional amount			Carrying amount		Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
Assets:
Commercial mortgage loans	$		⁽¹⁾	$	6,170	$	6,476	$	—	$	—	$	6,476
Restricted commercial mortgage loans			⁽¹⁾		161		179		—		—		179
Other invested assets			⁽¹⁾		273		279		—		197		82
Liabilities:
Long-term borrowings ⁽²⁾			⁽¹⁾		4,570		3,518		—		3,343		175
Non-recourse funding obligations ⁽²⁾			⁽¹⁾		1,920		1,401		—		—		1,401
Borrowings related to securitization entities			⁽¹⁾		98		104		—		104		—
Investment contracts			⁽¹⁾		17,258		17,910		—		5		17,905
Other firm commitments:
Commitments to fund limited partnerships		131			—		—		—		—		—
Ordinary course of business lending commitments		40			—		—		—		—		—

⁽¹⁾	These financial instruments do not have notional amounts.

⁽²⁾	See note 7 for additional information related to borrowings.

GENWORTH FINANCIAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

Recurring Fair Value Measurements

We have fixed maturity, equity and trading securities, derivatives, embedded derivatives, securities held as collateral, separate account assets and certain other financial instruments, which are carried at fair value. Below is a description of the valuation techniques and inputs used to determine fair value by class of instrument.

Fixed maturity, equity and trading securities

The fair value of fixed maturity, equity and trading securities are estimated primarily based on information derived from third-party pricing services (“pricing services”), internal models and/or third-party broker provided prices (“broker quotes”), which use a market approach, income approach or a combination of the market and income approach depending on the type of instrument and availability of information. In general, a market approach is utilized if there is readily available and relevant market activity for an individual security. In certain cases where market information is not available for a specific security but is available for similar securities, a security is valued using that market information for similar securities, which is also a market approach. When market information is not available for a specific security or is available but such information is less relevant or reliable, an income approach or a combination of a market and income approach is utilized. For securities with optionality, such as call or prepayment features (including mortgage-backed or asset-backed securities), an income approach may be used. In addition, a combination of the results from market and income approaches may be used to estimate fair value. These valuation techniques may change from period to period, based on the relevance and availability of market data.

We utilize certain third-party data providers when determining fair value. We consider information obtained from pricing services as well as broker quotes in our determination of fair value. Additionally, we utilize internal models to determine the valuation of securities using an income approach where the inputs are based on third-party provided market inputs. While we consider the valuations provided by pricing services and broker quotes to be of high quality, management determines the fair value of our investment securities after considering all relevant and available information. We also use various methods to obtain an understanding of the valuation methodologies and procedures used by third-party data providers to ensure sufficient understanding to evaluate the valuation data received, including an understanding of the assumptions and inputs utilized to determine the appropriate fair value. For pricing services, we analyze the prices provided by our primary pricing services to other readily available pricing services and perform a detailed review of the assumptions and inputs from each pricing service to determine the appropriate fair value when pricing differences exceed certain thresholds. We evaluate changes in fair value that are greater than certain pre-defined thresholds each month to further aid in our review of the accuracy of fair value measurements and our understanding of changes in fair value, with more detailed reviews performed by the asset managers responsible for the related asset class associated with the security being reviewed. A pricing committee provides additional oversight and guidance in the evaluation and review of the pricing methodologies used to value our investment portfolio.

In general, we first obtain valuations from pricing services. If a price is not supplied by a pricing service, we will typically seek a broker quote for public or private fixed maturity securities. In certain instances, we utilize price caps for broker quoted securities where the estimated market yield results in a valuation that may exceed the amount that we believe would be received in a market transaction. For certain private fixed maturity securities where we do not obtain valuations from pricing services, we utilize an internal model to determine fair value since transactions for identical securities are not readily observable and these securities are not typically valued by pricing services. For all securities, excluding certain private fixed maturity securities, if neither a pricing service nor broker quotes valuation is available, we determine fair value using internal models.

GENWORTH FINANCIAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

For pricing services, we obtain an understanding of the pricing methodologies and procedures for each type of instrument. Additionally, on a monthly basis we review a sample of securities, examining the pricing service’s assumptions to determine if we agree with the service’s derived price. When available, we also evaluate the prices sampled as compared to other public prices. If a variance greater than a pre-defined threshold is noted, additional review of the price is executed to ensure accuracy. In general, a pricing service does not provide a price for a security if sufficient information is not readily available to determine fair value or if such security is not in the specific sector or class covered by a particular pricing service. Given our understanding of the pricing methodologies and procedures of pricing services, the securities valued by pricing services are typically classified as Level 2 unless we determine the valuation process for a security or group of securities utilizes significant unobservable inputs, which would result in the valuation being classified as Level 3.

For private fixed maturity securities, we utilize an income approach where we obtain public bond spreads and utilize those in an internal model to determine fair value. Other inputs to the model include rating and weighted-average life, as well as sector which is used to assign the spread. We then add an additional premium, which represents an unobservable input, to the public bond spread to adjust for the liquidity and other features of our private placements. We utilize the estimated market yield to discount the expected cash flows of the security to determine fair value. We utilize price caps for securities where the estimated market yield results in a valuation that may exceed the amount that would be received in a market transaction and value all private fixed maturity securities at par that have less than 12 months to maturity. When a security does not have an external rating, we assign the security an internal rating to determine the appropriate public bond spread that should be utilized in the valuation. To evaluate the reasonableness of the internal model, we review a sample of private fixed maturity securities each month. In that review we compare the modeled prices to the prices of similar public securities in conjunction with analysis on current market indicators. If a pricing variance greater than a pre-defined threshold is noted, additional review of the price is executed to ensure accuracy. At the end of each month, all internally modeled prices are compared to the prior month prices with an evaluation of all securities with a month-over-month change greater than a pre-defined threshold. While we generally consider the public bond spreads by sector and maturity to be observable inputs, we evaluate the similarities of our private placement with the public bonds, any price caps utilized, liquidity premiums applied, and whether external ratings are available for our private placements to determine whether the spreads utilized would be considered observable inputs. We classify private securities without an external rating and public bond spread as Level 3. In general, increases (decreases) in credit spreads will decrease (increase) the fair value for our fixed maturity securities.

For broker quotes, we consider the valuation methodology utilized by the third party and analyze a sample each month to assess reasonableness given then-current market conditions. Additionally, for broker quotes on certain structured securities, we validate prices received against other publicly available pricing sources. Broker quotes are typically based on an income approach given the lack of available market data. As the valuation typically includes significant unobservable inputs, we classify the securities where fair value is based on our consideration of broker quotes as Level 3 measurements.

For remaining securities priced using internal models, we determine fair value using an income approach. We analyze a sample each month to assess reasonableness given then-current market conditions. We maximize the use of observable inputs but typically utilize significant unobservable inputs to determine fair value. Accordingly, the valuations are typically classified as Level 3.

A summary of the inputs used for our fixed maturity, equity and trading securities based on the level in which instruments are classified is included below. We have combined certain classes of instruments together as the nature of the inputs is similar.

GENWORTH FINANCIAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

Level 1 measurements

Equity securities. The primary inputs to the valuation of exchange-traded equity securities include quoted prices for the identical instrument.

Level 2 measurements

Fixed maturity securities

•

Third-party pricing services: In estimating the fair value of fixed maturity securities, approximately 90% of our portfolio is priced using third-party pricing sources. These pricing services utilize industry-standard valuation techniques that include market-based approaches, income-based approaches, a combination of market-based and income-based approaches or other proprietary, internally generated models as part of the valuation processes. These third-party pricing vendors maximize the use of publicly available data inputs to generate valuations for each asset class. Priority and type of inputs used may change frequently as certain inputs may be more direct drivers of valuation at the time of pricing. Examples of significant inputs incorporated by third-party pricing services may include sector and issuer spreads, seasoning, capital structure, security optionality, collateral data, prepayment assumptions, default assumptions, delinquencies, debt covenants, benchmark yields, trade data, dealer quotes, credit ratings, maturity and weighted-average life. We conduct regular meetings with our third-party pricing services for the purpose of understanding the methodologies, techniques and inputs used by the third-party pricing providers.

GENWORTH FINANCIAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

The following table presents a summary of the significant inputs used by our third-party pricing services for certain fair value measurements of fixed maturity securities that are classified as Level 2 as of March 31, 2016:


(Amounts in millions)	Fair value	Primary methodologies	Significant inputs
U.S. government, agencies and government-sponsored enterprises	$6,522	Price quotes from trading desk, broker feeds	Bid side prices, trade prices, Option Adjusted Spread (“OAS”) to swap curve, Bond Market Association OAS, Treasury Curve, Agency Bullet Curve, maturity to issuer spread
State and political subdivisions	$2,475	Multi-dimensional attribute-based modeling systems, third-party pricing vendors	Trade prices, material event notices, Municipal Market Data benchmark yields, broker quotes
Non-U.S. government	$2,062	Matrix pricing, spread priced to benchmark curves, price quotes from market makers	Benchmark yields, trade prices, broker quotes, comparative transactions, issuer spreads, bid-offer spread, market research publications, third-party pricing sources
U.S. corporate	$22,482	Multi-dimensional attribute-based modeling systems, broker quotes, price quotes from market makers, internal models, OAS-based models	Bid side prices to Treasury Curve, Issuer Curve, which includes sector, quality, duration, OAS percentage and change for spread matrix, trade prices, comparative transactions, Trade Reporting and Compliance Engine (“TRACE”) reports
Non-U.S. corporate	$10,796	Multi-dimensional attribute-based modeling systems, OAS-based models, price quotes from market makers	Benchmark yields, trade prices, broker quotes, comparative transactions, issuer spreads, bid-offer spread, market research publications, third-party pricing sources
Residential mortgage-backed	$5,001	OAS-based models, To Be Announced pricing models, single factor binomial models, internally priced	Prepayment and default assumptions, aggregation of bonds with similar characteristics, including collateral type, vintage, tranche type, weighted-average life, weighted-average loan age, issuer program and delinquency ratio, pay up and pay down factors, TRACE reports
Commercial mortgage-backed	$2,705	Multi-dimensional attribute-based modeling systems, pricing matrix, spread matrix priced to swap curves, Trepp commercial mortgage-backed securities analytics model	Credit risk, interest rate risk, prepayment speeds, new issue data, collateral performance, origination year, tranche type, original credit ratings, weighted-average life, cash flows, spreads derived from broker quotes, bid side prices, spreads to daily updated swaps curves, TRACE reports
Other asset-backed	$2,148	Multi-dimensional attribute-based modeling systems, spread matrix priced to swap curves, price quotes from market makers, internal models	Spreads to daily updated swaps curves, spreads derived from trade prices and broker quotes, bid side prices, new issue data, collateral performance, analysis of prepayment speeds, cash flows, collateral loss analytics, historical issue analysis, trade data from market makers, TRACE reports

GENWORTH FINANCIAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

•

Internal models: A portion of our non-U.S. government, U.S. corporate and non-U.S. corporate securities are valued using internal models. The fair value of these fixed maturity securities were $18 million, $618 million and $282 million, respectively, as of March 31, 2016. Internally modeled securities are primarily private fixed maturity securities where we use market observable inputs such as an interest rate yield curve, published credit spreads for similar securities based on the external ratings of the instrument and related industry sector of the issuer. Additionally, we may apply certain price caps and liquidity premiums in the valuation of private fixed maturity securities. Price caps and liquidity premiums are established using inputs from market participants.

Equity securities. The primary inputs to the valuation include quoted prices for identical assets, or similar assets in markets that are not active.

Level 3 measurements

Fixed maturity securities

•

Internal models: A portion of our U.S. government, agencies and government-sponsored enterprises, non-U.S. government, U.S. corporate, non-U.S. corporate, residential mortgage-backed, commercial mortgage-backed and other asset-backed securities are valued using internal models. The primary inputs to the valuation of the bond population include quoted prices for identical assets, or similar assets in markets that are not active, contractual cash flows, duration, call provisions, issuer rating, benchmark yields and credit spreads. Certain private fixed maturity securities are valued using an internal model using market observable inputs such as interest rate yield curve, as well as published credit spreads for similar securities where there are no external ratings of the instrument and include a significant unobservable input. Additionally, we may apply certain price caps and liquidity premiums in the valuation of private fixed maturity securities. Price caps are established using inputs from market participants. For structured securities, the primary inputs to the valuation include quoted prices for identical assets, or similar assets in markets that are not active, contractual cash flows, weighted-average coupon, weighted-average maturity, issuer rating, structure of the security, expected prepayment speeds and volumes, collateral type, current and forecasted loss severity, average delinquency rates, vintage of the loans, geographic region, debt service coverage ratios, payment priority with the tranche, benchmark yields and credit spreads. The fair value of our Level 3 fixed maturity securities priced using internal models was $3,512 million as of March 31, 2016.

•

Broker quotes: A portion of our state and political subdivisions, U.S. corporate, non-U.S. corporate, residential mortgage-backed, commercial mortgage-backed and other asset-backed securities are valued using broker quotes. Broker quotes are obtained from third-party providers that have current market knowledge to provide a reasonable price for securities not routinely priced by third-party pricing services. Brokers utilized for valuation of assets are reviewed annually. The fair value of our Level 3 fixed maturity securities priced by broker quotes was $1,669 million as of March 31, 2016.

Equity securities. The primary inputs to the valuation include broker quotes where the underlying inputs are unobservable and for internal models, structure of the security and issuer rating.

Restricted other invested assets related to securitization entities

We have trading securities related to securitization entities that are classified as restricted other invested assets and are carried at fair value. The trading securities represent asset-backed securities. The valuation for

GENWORTH FINANCIAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

trading securities is determined using a market approach and/or an income approach depending on the availability of information. For certain highly rated asset-backed securities, there is observable market information for transactions of the same or similar instruments, which is provided to us by a third-party pricing service and is classified as Level 2. For certain securities that are not actively traded, we determine fair value after considering third-party broker provided prices or discounted expected cash flows using current yields for similar securities and classify these valuations as Level 3.

Securities lending collateral

The fair value of securities held as collateral is primarily based on Level 2 inputs from market information for the collateral that is held on our behalf by the custodian. We determine fair value after considering prices obtained by third-party pricing services.

Separate account assets

The fair value of separate account assets is based on the quoted prices of the underlying fund investments and, therefore, represents Level 1 pricing.

Derivatives

We consider counterparty collateral arrangements and rights of set-off when evaluating our net credit risk exposure to our derivative counterparties. Accordingly, we are permitted to include consideration of these arrangements when determining whether any incremental adjustment should be made for both the counterparty’s and our non-performance risk in measuring fair value for our derivative instruments. As a result of these counterparty arrangements, we determined that any adjustment for credit risk would not be material and we have not recorded any incremental adjustment for our non-performance risk or the non-performance risk of the derivative counterparty for our derivative assets or liabilities. We determine fair value for our derivatives using an income approach with internal models based on relevant market inputs for each derivative instrument. We also compare the fair value determined using our internal model to the valuations provided by our derivative counterparties with any significant differences or changes in valuation being evaluated further by our derivatives professionals that are familiar with the instrument and market inputs used in the valuation.

Interest rate swaps. The valuation of interest rate swaps is determined using an income approach. The primary input into the valuation represents the forward interest rate swap curve, which is generally considered an observable input, and results in the derivative being classified as Level 2. For certain interest rate swaps, the inputs into the valuation also include the total returns of certain bonds that would primarily be considered an observable input and result in the derivative being classified as Level 2. For certain other swaps, there are features that provide an option to the counterparty to terminate the swap at specified dates. The interest rate volatility input used to value these options would be considered a significant unobservable input and results in the fair value measurement of the derivative being classified as Level 3. These options to terminate the swap by the counterparty are based on forward interest rate swap curves and volatility. As interest rate volatility increases, our valuation of the derivative changes unfavorably.

Interest rate swaps related to securitization entities. The valuation of interest rate swaps related to securitization entities is determined using an income approach. The primary input into the valuation represents the forward interest rate swap curve, which is generally considered an observable input, and results in the derivative being classified as Level 2.

GENWORTH FINANCIAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

Inflation indexed swaps. The valuation of inflation indexed swaps is determined using an income approach. The primary inputs into the valuation represent the forward interest rate swap curve, the current consumer price index and the forward consumer price index curve, which are generally considered observable inputs, and results in the derivative being classified as Level 2.

Foreign currency swaps. The valuation of foreign currency swaps is determined using an income approach. The primary inputs into the valuation represent the forward interest rate swap curve and foreign currency exchange rates, both of which are considered an observable input, and results in the derivative being classified as Level 2.

Credit default swaps. We have both single name credit default swaps and index tranche credit default swaps. For single name credit default swaps, we utilize an income approach to determine fair value based on using current market information for the credit spreads of the reference entity, which is considered observable inputs based on the reference entities of our derivatives and results in these derivatives being classified as Level 2. For index tranche credit default swaps, we utilize an income approach that utilizes current market information related to credit spreads and expected defaults and losses associated with the reference entities that comprise the respective index associated with each derivative. There are significant unobservable inputs associated with the timing and amount of losses from the reference entities as well as the timing or amount of losses, if any, that will be absorbed by our tranche. Accordingly, the index tranche credit default swaps are classified as Level 3. As credit spreads widen for the underlying issuers comprising the index, the change in our valuation of these credit default swaps will be unfavorable.

Credit default swaps related to securitization entities. Credit default swaps related to securitization entities represent customized index tranche credit default swaps and are valued using a similar methodology as described above for index tranche credit default swaps. We determine fair value of these credit default swaps after considering both the valuation methodology described above as well as the valuation provided by the derivative counterparty. In addition to the valuation methodology and inputs described for index tranche credit default swaps, these customized credit default swaps contain a feature that permits the securitization entity to provide the par value of underlying assets in the securitization entity to settle any losses under the credit default swap. The valuation of this settlement feature is dependent upon the valuation of the underlying assets and the timing and amount of any expected loss on the credit default swap, which is considered a significant unobservable input. Accordingly, these customized index tranche credit default swaps related to securitization entities are classified as Level 3. As credit spreads widen for the underlying issuers comprising the customized index, the change in our valuation of these credit default swaps will be unfavorable.

Equity index options. We have equity index options associated with various equity indices. The valuation of equity index options is determined using an income approach. The primary inputs into the valuation represent forward interest rate volatility and time value component associated with the optionality in the derivative, which are considered significant unobservable inputs in most instances. The equity index volatility surface is determined based on market information that is not readily observable and is developed based upon inputs received from several third-party sources. Accordingly, these options are classified as Level 3. As equity index volatility increases, our valuation of these options changes favorably.

Financial futures. The fair value of financial futures is based on the closing exchange prices. Accordingly, these financial futures are classified as Level 1. The period end valuation is zero as a result of settling the margins on these contracts on a daily basis.

GENWORTH FINANCIAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

Equity return swaps. The valuation of equity return swaps is determined using an income approach. The primary inputs into the valuation represent the forward interest rate swap curve and underlying equity index values, which are generally considered observable inputs, and results in the derivative being classified as Level 2.

Forward bond purchase commitments. The valuation of forward bond purchase commitments is determined using an income approach. The primary input into the valuation represents the current bond prices and interest rates, which are generally considered an observable input, and results in the derivative being classified as Level 2.

Other foreign currency contracts. We have certain foreign currency options classified as other foreign currency contracts. The valuation of foreign currency options is determined using an income approach. The primary inputs into the valuation represent the forward interest rate swap curve, foreign currency exchange rates, forward interest rate, foreign currency exchange rate volatility, foreign equity index volatility and time value component associated with the optionality in the derivative. As a result of the significant unobservable inputs associated with the forward interest rate, foreign currency exchange rate volatility and foreign equity index volatility inputs, the derivative is classified as Level 3. As foreign currency exchange rate volatility and foreign equity index volatility increases, the change in our valuation of these options will be favorable for purchase options and unfavorable for options sold. We also have foreign currency forward contracts where the valuation is determined using an income approach. The primary inputs into the valuation represent the forward foreign currency exchange rates, which are generally considered observable inputs and results in the derivative being classified as Level 2.

GMWB embedded derivatives

We are required to bifurcate an embedded derivative for certain features associated with annuity products and related reinsurance agreements where we provide a GMWB to the policyholder and are required to record the GMWB embedded derivative at fair value. The valuation of our GMWB embedded derivative is based on an income approach that incorporates inputs such as forward interest rates, equity index volatility, equity index and fund correlation, and policyholder assumptions such as utilization, lapse and mortality. In addition to these inputs, we also consider risk and expense margins when determining the projected cash flows that would be determined by another market participant. While the risk and expense margins are considered in determining fair value, these inputs do not have a significant impact on the valuation. We determine fair value using an internal model based on the various inputs noted above. The resulting fair value measurement from the model is reviewed by the product actuarial, risk and finance professionals each reporting period with changes in fair value also being compared to changes in derivatives and other instruments used to mitigate changes in fair value from certain market risks, such as equity index volatility and interest rates.

For GMWB liabilities, non-performance risk is integrated into the discount rate. Our discount rate used to determine fair value of our GMWB liabilities includes market credit spreads above U.S. Treasury rates to reflect an adjustment for the non-performance risk of the GMWB liabilities. As of March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, the impact of non-performance risk resulted in a lower fair value of our GMWB liabilities of $91 million and $79 million, respectively.

To determine the appropriate discount rate to reflect the non-performance risk of the GMWB liabilities, we evaluate the non-performance risk in our liabilities based on a hypothetical exit market transaction as there is no exit market for these types of liabilities. A hypothetical exit market can be viewed as a hypothetical transfer of the liability to another similarly rated insurance company which would closely resemble a reinsurance

GENWORTH FINANCIAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

transaction. Another hypothetical exit market transaction can be viewed as a hypothetical transaction from the perspective of the GMWB policyholder. In determining the appropriate discount rate to incorporate non-performance risk of the GMWB liabilities, we also considered the impacts of state guarantees embedded in the related insurance product as a form of inseparable third-party guarantee. We believe that a hypothetical exit market participant would use a similar discount rate as described above to value the liabilities.

For equity index volatility, we determine the projected equity market volatility using both historical volatility and projected equity market volatility with more significance being placed on projected near-term volatility and recent historical data. Given the different attributes and market characteristics of GMWB liabilities compared to equity index options in the derivative market, the equity index volatility assumption for GMWB liabilities may be different from the volatility assumption for equity index options, especially for the longer dated points on the curve.

Equity index and fund correlations are determined based on historical price observations for the fund and equity index.

For policyholder assumptions, we use our expected lapse, mortality and utilization assumptions and update these assumptions for our actual experience, as necessary. For our lapse assumption, we adjust our base lapse assumption by policy based on a combination of the policyholder’s current account value and GMWB benefit.

We classify the GMWB valuation as Level 3 based on having significant unobservable inputs, with equity index volatility and non-performance risk being considered the more significant unobservable inputs. As equity index volatility increases, the fair value of the GMWB liabilities will increase. Any increase in non-performance risk would increase the discount rate and would decrease the fair value of the GMWB liability. Additionally, we consider lapse and utilization assumptions to be significant unobservable inputs. An increase in our lapse assumption would decrease the fair value of the GMWB liability, whereas an increase in our utilization rate would increase the fair value.

Fixed index annuity embedded derivatives

We have fixed indexed annuity products where interest is credited to the policyholder’s account balance based on equity index changes. This feature is required to be bifurcated as an embedded derivative and recorded at fair value. Fair value is determined using an income approach where the present value of the excess cash flows above the guaranteed cash flows is used to determine the value attributed to the equity index feature. The inputs used in determining the fair value include policyholder behavior (lapses and withdrawals), near-term equity index volatility, expected future interest credited, forward interest rates and an adjustment to the discount rate to incorporate non-performance risk and risk margins. As a result of our assumptions for policyholder behavior and expected future interest credited being considered significant unobservable inputs, we classify these instruments as Level 3. As lapses and withdrawals increase, the value of our embedded derivative liability will decrease. As expected future interest credited decreases, the value of our embedded derivative liability will decrease.

Indexed universal life embedded derivatives

We have indexed universal life products where interest is credited to the policyholder’s account balance based on equity index changes. This feature is required to be bifurcated as an embedded derivative and recorded at fair value. Fair value is determined using an income approach where the present value of the excess cash flows above the guaranteed cash flows is used to determine the value attributed to the equity index feature. The inputs

GENWORTH FINANCIAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

used in determining the fair value include policyholder behavior (lapses and withdrawals), near-term equity index volatility, expected future interest credited, forward interest rates and an adjustment to the discount rate to incorporate non-performance risk and risk margins. As a result of our assumptions for policyholder behavior and expected future interest credited being considered significant unobservable inputs, we classify these instruments as Level 3. As lapses and withdrawals increase, the value of our embedded derivative liability will decrease. As expected future interest credited decreases, the value of our embedded derivative liability will decrease.

Borrowings related to securitization entities

We record certain borrowings related to securitization entities at fair value. The fair value of these borrowings is determined using either a market approach or income approach, depending on the instrument and availability of market information. Given the unique characteristics of the securitization entities that issued these borrowings as well as the lack of comparable instruments, we determine fair value considering the valuation of the underlying assets held by the securitization entities and any derivatives, as well as any unique characteristics of the borrowings that may impact the valuation. After considering all relevant inputs, we determine fair value of the borrowings using the net valuation of the underlying assets and derivatives that are backing the borrowings. Accordingly, these instruments are classified as Level 3. Increases in the valuation of the underlying assets or decreases in the derivative liabilities will result in an increase in the fair value of these borrowings.

GENWORTH FINANCIAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

The following tables set forth our assets by class of instrument that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of the dates indicated:


	March 31, 2016
(Amounts in millions)	Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
Assets
Investments:
Fixed maturity securities:
U.S. government, agencies and government-sponsored enterprises	$	6,524	$	—	$	6,522	$	2
State and political subdivisions		2,517		—		2,475		42
Non-U.S. government		2,080		—		2,080		—
U.S. corporate:
Utilities		4,269		—		3,787		482
Energy		2,164		—		1,934		230
Finance and insurance		5,815		—		5,118		697
Consumer—non-cyclical		4,354		—		4,242		112
Technology and communications		2,300		—		2,263		37
Industrial		1,225		—		1,161		64
Capital goods		2,050		—		1,896		154
Consumer—cyclical		1,692		—		1,482		210
Transportation		1,132		—		1,009		123
Other		388		—		208		180

Total U.S. corporate		25,389		—		23,100		2,289

Non-U.S. corporate:
Utilities		1,084		—		768		316
Energy		1,437		—		1,211		226
Finance and insurance		2,619		—		2,428		191
Consumer—non-cyclical		766		—		603		163
Technology and communications		1,039		—		975		64
Industrial		1,034		—		938		96
Capital goods		610		—		396		214
Consumer—cyclical		544		—		474		70
Transportation		620		—		476		144
Other		2,876		—		2,809		67

Total non-U.S. corporate		12,629		—		11,078		1,551

Residential mortgage-backed		5,122		—		5,001		121
Commercial mortgage-backed		2,713		—		2,705		8
Other asset-backed		3,316		—		2,148		1,168

Total fixed maturity securities		60,290		—		55,109		5,181

Equity securities		431		386		1		44

Other invested assets:
Trading securities		471		—		471		—
Derivative assets:
Interest rate swaps		1,613		—		1,613		—
Foreign currency swaps		7		—		7		—
Credit default swaps		1		—		—		1
Equity index options		36		—		—		36
Equity return swaps		2		—		2		—
Other foreign currency contracts		7		—		6		1

Total derivative assets		1,666		—		1,628		38

Securities lending collateral		415		—		415		—

Total other invested assets		2,552		—		2,514		38

Restricted other invested assets related to securitization entities		422		—		181		241
Reinsurance recoverable ⁽¹⁾		23		—		—		23
Separate account assets		7,624		7,624		—		—

Total assets	$	71,342	$	8,010	$	57,805	$	5,527

⁽¹⁾	Represents embedded derivatives associated with the reinsured portion of our GMWB liabilities.

GENWORTH FINANCIAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)


	December 31, 2015
(Amounts in millions)	Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
Assets
Investments:
Fixed maturity securities:
U.S. government, agencies and government-sponsored enterprises	$	6,203	$	—	$	6,200	$	3
State and political subdivisions		2,438		—		2,403		35
Non-U.S. government		2,015		—		2,015		—
U.S. corporate:
Utilities		3,693		—		3,244		449
Energy		2,501		—		2,248		253
Finance and insurance		5,632		—		4,917		715
Consumer—non-cyclical		4,096		—		3,987		109
Technology and communications		2,193		—		2,158		35
Industrial		1,173		—		1,112		61
Capital goods		1,950		—		1,770		180
Consumer—cyclical		1,675		—		1,436		239
Transportation		1,086		—		980		106
Other		402		—		220		182

Total U.S. corporate		24,401		—		22,072		2,329

Non-U.S. corporate:
Utilities		843		—		556		287
Energy		1,686		—		1,434		252
Finance and insurance		2,473		—		2,282		191
Consumer—non-cyclical		752		—		583		169
Technology and communications		988		—		926		62
Industrial		986		—		902		84
Capital goods		604		—		391		213
Consumer—cyclical		526		—		455		71
Transportation		605		—		461		144
Other		2,736		—		2,664		72

Total non-U.S. corporate		12,199		—		10,654		1,545

Residential mortgage-backed		5,101		—		4,985		116
Commercial mortgage-backed		2,559		—		2,549		10
Other asset-backed		3,281		—		2,139		1,142

Total fixed maturity securities		58,197		—		53,017		5,180

Equity securities		310		270		2		38

Other invested assets:
Trading securities		447		—		447		—
Derivative assets:
Interest rate swaps		1,054		—		1,054		—
Foreign currency swaps		8		—		8		—
Credit default swaps		1		—		—		1
Equity index options		30		—		—		30
Equity return swaps		2		—		2		—
Other foreign currency contracts		17		—		14		3

Total derivative assets		1,112		—		1,078		34

Securities lending collateral		347		—		347		—

Total other invested assets		1,906		—		1,872		34

Restricted other invested assets related to securitization entities		413		—		181		232
Reinsurance recoverable ⁽¹⁾		17		—		—		17
Separate account assets		7,883		7,883		—		—

Total assets	$	68,726	$	8,153	$	55,072	$	5,501

⁽¹⁾	Represents embedded derivatives associated with the reinsured portion of our GMWB liabilities.

GENWORTH FINANCIAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

We review the fair value hierarchy classifications each reporting period. Changes in the observability of the valuation attributes may result in a reclassification of certain financial assets or liabilities. Such reclassifications are reported as transfers between levels at the beginning fair value for the reporting period in which the changes occur. Given the types of assets classified as Level 1, which primarily represents mutual fund investments, we typically do not have any transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 measurement categories and did not have any such transfers during any period presented.

Our assessment of whether or not there were significant unobservable inputs related to fixed maturity securities was based on our observations obtained through the course of managing our investment portfolio, including interaction with other market participants, observations related to the availability and consistency of pricing and/or rating, and understanding of general market activity such as new issuance and the level of secondary market trading for a class of securities. Additionally, we considered data obtained from third-party pricing sources to determine whether our estimated values incorporate significant unobservable inputs that would result in the valuation being classified as Level 3.

GENWORTH FINANCIAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

The following tables present additional information about assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis and for which we have utilized significant unobservable (Level 3) inputs to determine fair value as of or for the dates indicated:


	Beginning balance as of January 1, 2016		Total realized and unrealized gains (losses)																				Ending balance as of March 31, 2016		Total gains (losses) included in net income attributable to assets still held
(Amounts in millions)	Beginning balance as of January 1, 2016		Included in net income			Included in OCI			Purchases		Sales		Issuances		Settlements			Transfer into Level 3 ⁽¹⁾		Transfer out of Level 3 ⁽¹⁾			Ending balance as of March 31, 2016
Fixed maturity securities:
U.S. government, agencies and government-sponsored enterprises	$	3	$	—		$	—		$	—	$	—	$	—	$	(1	)	$	—	$	—		$	2	$	—
State and political subdivisions		35		1			(1	)		7		—		—		—			—		—			42		1
U.S. corporate:
Utilities		449		1			5			13		—		—		(8	)		49		(27	)		482		—
Energy		253		—			(1	)		—		—		—		(1	)		7		(28	)		230		—
Finance and insurance		715		10			7			—		—		—		(17	)		—		(18	)		697		10
Consumer—non-cyclical		109		—			3			—		—		—		—			—		—			112		—
Technology and communications		35		1			1			—		—		—		—			—		—			37		1
Industrial		61		—			3			—		—		—		—			—		—			64		—
Capital goods		180		—			3			—		—		—		—			—		(29	)		154		—
Consumer—cyclical		239		4			4			3		—		—		(40	)		—		—			210		—
Transportation		106		—			4			17		—		—		(4	)		—		—			123		—
Other		182		—			1			—		—		—		(1	)		—		(2	)		180		—

Total U.S. corporate		2,329		16			30			33		—		—		(71	)		56		(104	)		2,289		11

Non-U.S. corporate:
Utilities		287		—			3			—		—		—		—			26		—			316		—
Energy		252		—			13			—		—		—		(13	)		—		(26	)		226		—
Finance and insurance		191		1			(1	)		—		—		—		—			—		—			191		1
Consumer—non-cyclical		169		—			5			—		—		—		(11	)		—		—			163		—
Technology and communications		62		—			2			—		—		—		—			—		—			64		—
Industrial		84		—			3			—		—		—		—			9		—			96		—
Capital goods		213		—			7			—		—		—		(6	)		—		—			214		—
Consumer—cyclical		71		—			1			—		—		—		(2	)		—		—			70		—
Transportation		144		—			—			—		—		—		—			—		—			144		—
Other		72		—			2			—		—		—		(7	)		—		—			67		—

Total non-U.S. corporate		1,545		1			35			—		—		—		(39	)		35		(26	)		1,551		1

Residential mortgage-backed		116		—			2			38		—		—		(2	)		—		(33	)		121		—
Commercial mortgage-backed		10		—			—			—		—		—		(2	)		—		—			8		—
Other asset-backed		1,142		1			(16	)		12		—		—		(6	)		35		—			1,168		1

Total fixed maturity securities		5,180		19			50			90		—		—		(121	)		126		(163	)		5,181		14

Equity securities		38		—			—			6		—		—		—			—		—			44		—

Other invested assets:
Derivative assets:
Credit default swaps		1		—			—			—		—		—		—			—		—			1		—
Equity index options		30		(3	)		—			13		—		—		(4	)		—		—			36		3
Other foreign currency contracts		3		(2	)		—			—		—		—		—			—		—			1		(2	)

Total derivative assets		34		(5	)		—			13		—		—		(4	)		—		—			38		1

Total other invested assets		34		(5	)		—			13		—		—		(4	)		—		—			38		1

Restricted other invested assets related to securitization entities		232		9			—			—		—		—		—			—		—			241		9
Reinsurance recoverable ⁽²⁾		17		5			—			—		—		1		—			—		—			23		5

Total Level 3 assets	$	5,501	$	28		$	50		$	109	$	—	$	1	$	(125	)	$	126	$	(163	)	$	5,527	$	29

⁽¹⁾

The transfers into and out of Level 3 for fixed maturity securities were related to changes in the primary pricing source and changes in the observability of external information used in determining the fair value, such as external ratings or credit spreads, as well as changes in the industry sectors assigned to specific securities.

⁽²⁾	Represents embedded derivatives associated with the reinsured portion of our GMWB liabilities.

GENWORTH FINANCIAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)


	Beginning balance as of January 1, 2015		Total realized and unrealized gains (losses)																					Ending balance as of March 31, 2015		Total gains (losses) included in net income attributable to assets still held
(Amounts in millions)	Beginning balance as of January 1, 2015		Included in net income			Included in OCI			Purchases		Sales			Issuances		Settlements			Transfer into Level 3⁽¹⁾		Transfer out of Level 3⁽¹⁾			Ending balance as of March 31, 2015
Fixed maturity securities:
U.S. government, agencies and government-sponsored enterprises	$	4	$	—		$	—		$	—	$	—		$	—	$	(1	)	$	—	$	—		$	3	$	—
State and political subdivisions		30		1			(1	)		5		—			—		—			—		(5	)		30		1
Non-U.S. government		7		—			—			—		—			—		(1	)		—		—			6		—
U.S. corporate:
Utilities		444		—			6			15		—			—		(2	)		—		(1	)		462		—
Energy		285		—			3			—		—			—		—			—		(8	)		280		—
Finance and insurance		616		5			15			20		—			—		(18	)		—		(1	)		637		4
Consumer—non-cyclical		140		1			4			—		—			—		(28	)		—		—			117		—
Technology and communications		45		—			2			—		—			—		—			—		—			47		—
Industrial		36		—			1			—		—			—		—			—		—			37		—
Capital goods		166		—			1			—		—			—		—			—		—			167		—
Consumer—cyclical		363		—			5			—		—			—		(1	)		—		—			367		—
Transportation		153		1			2			7		—			—		(2	)		—		—			161		1
Other		171		1			2			—		—			—		(1	)		—		—			173		1

Total U.S. corporate		2,419		8			41			42		—			—		(52	)		—		(10	)		2,448		6

Non-U.S. corporate:
Utilities		328		—			4			—		—			—		—			—		—			332		—
Energy		324		(1	)		(7	)		—		(9	)		—		—			—		—			307		(1	)
Finance and insurance		221		1			6			—		—			—		(2	)		—		—			226		1
Consumer—non-cyclical		197		—			5			—		—			—		(30	)		—		—			172		—
Technology and communications		42		—			—			—		—			—		—			1		—			43		—
Industrial		131		—			2			7		—			—		(14	)		1		—			127		—
Capital goods		237		—			5			—		—			—		—			—		—			242		—
Consumer—cyclical		89		—			2			—		—			—		—			—		(1	)		90		—
Transportation		154		—			3			—		—			—		—			—		—			157		—
Other		81		—			1			—		—			—		—			1		—			83		—

Total non-U.S. corporate		1,804		—			21			7		(9	)		—		(46	)		3		(1	)		1,779		—

Residential mortgage-backed		65		—			(2	)		—		—			—		(2	)		—		—			61		—
Commercial mortgage-backed		5		—			—			—		—			—		—			—		(1	)		4		—
Other asset-backed		1,420		—			14			38		—			—		(11	)		33		(38	)		1,456		—

Total fixed maturity securities		5,754		9			73			92		(9	)		—		(113	)		36		(55	)		5,787		7

Equity securities		34		—			—			1		(1	)		—		—			—		—			34		—

Other invested assets:
Derivative assets:
Credit default swaps		3		—			—			—		—			—		(1	)		—		—			2		—
Equity index options		17		(10	)		—			8		—			—		—			—		—			15		(8	)

Total derivative assets		20		(10	)		—			8		—			—		(1	)		—		—			17		(8	)

Total other invested assets		20		(10	)		—			8		—			—		(1	)		—		—			17		(8	)

Restricted other invested assets related to securitization entities		230		—			—			—		—			—		—			—		—			230		—
Reinsurance recoverable ⁽²⁾		13		1			—			—		—			—		—			—		—			14		1

Total Level 3 assets	$	6,051	$	—		$	73		$	101	$	(10	)	$	—	$	(114	)	$	36	$	(55	)	$	6,082	$	—

⁽¹⁾	The transfers into and out of Level 3 for fixed maturity securities were related to changes in the primary pricing source and changes in the observability of external information used in determining the fair value, such as external ratings or credit spreads.

⁽²⁾	Represents embedded derivatives associated with the reinsured portion of our GMWB liabilities.

GENWORTH FINANCIAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

The following table presents the gains and losses included in net income from assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis and for which we have utilized significant unobservable (Level 3) inputs to determine fair value and the related income statement line item in which these gains and losses were presented for the three months ended March 31:


(Amounts in millions)	2016		2015
Total realized and unrealized gains (losses) included in net income:
Net investment income	$	20	$	11
Net investment gains (losses)		8		(11	)

Total	$	28	$	—

Net gains (losses) included in net income attributable to assets still held:
Net investment income	$	15	$	9
Net investment gains (losses)		14		(9	)

Total	$	29	$	—

The amount presented for unrealized gains (losses) included in net income for available-for-sale securities represents impairments and accretion on certain fixed maturity securities.

The following tables set forth our liabilities by class of instrument that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of the dates indicated:


	March 31, 2016
(Amounts in millions)	Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
Liabilities
Policyholder account balances:
GMWB embedded derivatives ⁽¹⁾	$	443	$	—	$	—	$	443
Fixed index annuity embedded derivatives		345		—		—		345
Indexed universal life embedded derivatives		12		—		—		12

Total policyholder account balances		800		—		—		800

Derivative liabilities:
Interest rate swaps		360		—		360		—
Interest rate swaps related to securitization entities		35		—		35		—
Inflation indexed swaps		36		—		36		—
Foreign currency swaps		18		—		18		—
Credit default swaps		1		—		1		—
Credit default swaps related to securitization entities		6		—		—		6
Equity return swaps		14		—		14		—
Other foreign currency contracts		31		—		31		—

Total derivative liabilities		501		—		495		6

Borrowings related to securitization entities		85		—		—		85

Total liabilities	$	1,386	$	—	$	495	$	891

⁽¹⁾	Represents embedded derivatives associated with our GMWB liabilities, excluding the impact of reinsurance.

GENWORTH FINANCIAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)


	December 31, 2015
(Amounts in millions)	Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
Liabilities
Policyholder account balances:
GMWB embedded derivatives ⁽¹⁾	$	352	$	—	$	—	$	352
Fixed index annuity embedded derivatives		342		—		—		342
Indexed universal life embedded derivatives		10		—		—		10

Total policyholder account balances		704		—		—		704

Derivative liabilities:
Interest rate swaps		220		—		220		—
Interest rate swaps related to securitization entities		30		—		30		—
Inflation indexed swaps		33		—		33		—
Foreign currency swaps		27		—		27		—
Credit default swaps related to securitization entities		14		—		—		14
Equity return swaps		1		—		1		—
Other foreign currency contracts		34		—		34		—

Total derivative liabilities		359		—		345		14

Borrowings related to securitization entities		81		—		—		81

Total liabilities	$	1,144	$	—	$	345	$	799

⁽¹⁾	Represents embedded derivatives associated with our GMWB liabilities, excluding the impact of reinsurance.

The following tables present additional information about liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis and for which we have utilized significant unobservable (Level 3) inputs to determine fair value as of or for the dates indicated:


	Beginning balance as of January 1, 2016		Total realized and unrealized (gains) losses																		Ending balance as of March 31, 2016		Total (gains) losses included in net (income) attributable to liabilities still held
(Amounts in millions)	Beginning balance as of January 1, 2016		Included in net (income)			Included in OCI		Purchases		Sales		Issuances		Settlements			Transfer into Level 3		Transfer out of Level 3		Ending balance as of March 31, 2016
Policyholder account balances:
GMWB embedded derivatives ⁽¹⁾	$	352	$	83		$	—	$	—	$	—	$	8	$	—		$	—	$	—	$	443	$	87
Fixed index annuity embedded derivatives		342		(3	)		—		—		—		10		(4	)		—		—		345		(3	)
Indexed universal life embedded derivatives		10		(2	)		—		—		—		4		—			—		—		12		(2	)

Total policyholder account balances		704		78			—		—		—		22		(4	)		—		—		800		82

Derivative liabilities:
Credit default swaps related to securitization entities		14		(9	)		—		—		—		1		—			—		—		6		(9	)

Total derivative liabilities		14		(9	)		—		—		—		1		—			—		—		6		(9	)

Borrowings related to securitization entities		81		4			—		—		—		—		—			—		—		85		4

Total Level 3 liabilities	$	799	$	73		$	—	$	—	$	—	$	23	$	(4	)	$	—	$	—	$	891	$	77

⁽¹⁾	Represents embedded derivatives associated with our GMWB liabilities, excluding the impact of reinsurance.

GENWORTH FINANCIAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)


	Beginning balance as of January 1, 2015		Total realized and unrealized (gains) losses																		Ending balance as of March 31, 2015		Total (gains) losses included in net (income) attributable to liabilities still held
(Amounts in millions)	Beginning balance as of January 1, 2015		Included in net (income)			Included in OCI		Purchases		Sales		Issuances		Settlements			Transfer into Level 3		Transfer out of Level 3		Ending balance as of March 31, 2015
Policyholder account balances:
GMWB embedded derivatives ⁽¹⁾	$	291	$	17		$	—	$	—	$	—	$	8	$	—		$	—	$	—	$	316	$	20
Fixed index annuity embedded derivatives		276		7			—		—		—		19		(2	)		—		—		300		7
Indexed universal life embedded derivatives		7		(1	)		—		—		—		1		—			—		—		7		—

Total policyholder account balances		574		23			—		—		—		28		(2	)		—		—		623		27

Derivative liabilities:
Credit default swaps related to securitization entities		17		(8	)		—		1		—		—		—			—		—		10		(8	)

Total derivative liabilities		17		(8	)		—		1		—		—		—			—		—		10		(8	)

Borrowings related to securitization entities		85		(4	)		—		—		—		—		—			—		—		81		(4	)

Total Level 3 liabilities	$	676	$	11		$	—	$	1	$	—	$	28	$	(2	)	$	—	$	—	$	714	$	15

⁽¹⁾	Represents embedded derivatives associated with our GMWB liabilities, excluding the impact of reinsurance.

The following table presents the gains and losses included in net (income) from liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis and for which we have utilized significant unobservable (Level 3) inputs to determine fair value and the related income statement line item in which these gains and losses were presented for the three months ended March 31:


(Amounts in millions)	2016		2015
Total realized and unrealized (gains) losses included in net (income):
Net investment income	$	—	$	—
Net investment (gains) losses		73		11

Total	$	73	$	11

Total (gains) losses included in net (income) attributable to liabilities still held:
Net investment income	$	—	$	—
Net investment (gains) losses		77		15

Total	$	77	$	15

Purchases, sales, issuances and settlements represent the activity that occurred during the period that results in a change of the asset or liability but does not represent changes in fair value for the instruments held at the beginning of the period. Such activity primarily consists of purchases, sales and settlements of fixed maturity, equity and trading securities and purchases, issuances and settlements of derivative instruments.

Issuances presented for GMWB embedded derivative liabilities are characterized as the change in fair value associated with the product fees recognized that are attributed to the embedded derivative to equal the expected future benefit costs upon issuance. Issuances for fixed index annuity and indexed universal life embedded derivative liabilities represent the amount of the premium received that is attributed to the value of the embedded

GENWORTH FINANCIAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

derivative. Settlements of embedded derivatives are characterized as the change in fair value upon exercising the embedded derivative instrument, effectively representing a settlement of the embedded derivative instrument. We have shown these changes in fair value separately based on the classification of this activity as effectively issuing and settling the embedded derivative instrument with all remaining changes in the fair value of these embedded derivative instruments being shown separately in the category labeled “included in net (income)” in the tables presented above.

The following table presents a summary of the significant unobservable inputs used for certain fair value measurements that are based on internal models and classified as Level 3 as of March 31, 2016:

(Amounts in millions)

Valuation technique

Fair value

Unobservable input

Range

Weighted-average

Fixed maturity securities:

U.S. corporate:

Utilities

Internal models

459

Credit spreads

113bps - 447bps

186bps

Energy

Internal models

Credit spreads

137bps - 454bps

282bps

Finance and insurance

Internal models

587

Credit spreads

114bps - 677bps

272bps

Consumer—non-cyclical

Internal models

112

Credit spreads

143bps - 419bps

257bps

Technology and communications

Internal models

Credit spreads

425bps

Not applicable

Industrial

Internal models

Credit spreads

222bps - 321bps

275bps

Capital goods

Internal models

154

Credit spreads

85bps - 436bps

220bps

Consumer—cyclical

Internal models

210

Credit spreads

85bps - 355bps

222bps

Transportation

Internal models

113

Credit spreads

59bps - 323bps

202bps

Other

Internal models

166

Credit spreads

97bps - 310bps

163bps

Total U.S. corporate

Internal models

1,997

Credit spreads

59bps - 677bps

233bps

Non-U.S. corporate:

Utilities

Internal models

316

Credit spreads

114bps - 210bps

170bps

Energy

Internal models

174

Credit spreads

159bps - 398bps

249bps

Finance and insurance

Internal models

181

Credit spreads

127bps - 268bps

179bps

Consumer—non-cyclical

Internal models

158

Credit spreads

85bps - 305bps

196bps

Technology and communications

Internal models

Credit spreads

187bps - 398bps

287bps

Industrial

Internal models

Credit spreads

143bps - 310bps

248bps

Capital goods

Internal models

179

Credit spreads

143bps - 321bps

229bps

Consumer—cyclical

Internal models

Credit spreads

133bps - 317bps

222bps

Transportation

Internal models

144

Credit spreads

122bps - 317bps

205bps

Other

Internal models

Credit spreads

291bps - 786bps

516bps

Total non-U.S. corporate

Internal models

1,411

Credit spreads

85bps - 786bps

217bps

Derivative assets:

Credit default swaps

Discounted cash flows

Credit spreads

9bps

Not applicable

Equity index options

Discounted cash flows

Equity index
volatility

— % - 22%

16%

Other foreign currency contracts

Discounted cash flows

Foreign exchange
rate volatility

10% - 14%

13%

Policyholder account balances:

Withdrawal

utilization rate

— % - 99%

66%

Lapse rate

— % - 15%

Non-performance risk

(credit spreads)

40bps - 85bps

72bps

GMWB embedded derivatives ⁽¹⁾

Stochastic cash

flow model

443

Equity index
volatility

16% - 24%

21%

Fixed index annuity embedded derivatives

Option budget method

345

Expected future
interest credited

— % - 3%

Indexed universal life embedded derivatives

Option budget method

Expected future
interest credited

3% - 9%

⁽¹⁾	Represents embedded derivatives associated with our GMWB liabilities, excluding the impact of reinsurance.

GENWORTH FINANCIAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

Certain classes of instruments classified as Level 3 are excluded above as a result of not being material or due to limitations in being able to obtain the underlying inputs used by certain third-party sources, such as broker quotes, used as an input in determining fair value.

(7) Borrowings and Other Financings

(a) Short-Term Borrowings

Revolving Credit Facility

In April 2016, Genworth Holdings terminated its $300 million multicurrency revolving credit facility, prior to its September 26, 2016 maturity date. There were no amounts outstanding under the credit facility at the time of termination.

(b) Long-Term Borrowings

The following table sets forth total long-term borrowings as of the dates indicated:


(Amounts in millions)	March 31, 2016			December 31, 2015
Genworth Holdings⁽¹⁾
8.625% Senior Notes, due 2016	$	—		$	298
6.52% Senior Notes, due 2018		597			598
7.70% Senior Notes, due 2020		397			397
7.20% Senior Notes, due 2021		381			389
7.625% Senior Notes, due 2021		705			724
4.90% Senior Notes, due 2023		399			399
4.80% Senior Notes, due 2024		400			400
6.50% Senior Notes, due 2034		297			297
6.15% Fixed-to-Floating Rate Junior Subordinated Notes, due 2066		598			598

Subtotal		3,774			4,100
Bond consent fees		(43	)		—
Deferred borrowing charges		(20	)		(21	)

Total Genworth Holdings		3,711			4,079

Canada⁽²⁾
5.68% Senior Notes, due 2020		212			199
4.24% Senior Notes, due 2024		123			116

Subtotal		335			315
Deferred borrowing charges		(2	)		(2	)

Total Canada		333			313

Australia⁽³⁾
Floating Rate Junior Notes, due 2021		38			36
Floating Rate Junior Notes, due 2025		154			146

Subtotal		192			182
Deferred borrowing charges		(4	)		(4	)

Total Australia		188			178

Total	$	4,232		$	4,570

⁽¹⁾

We have the option to redeem all or a portion of the senior notes at any time with notice to the noteholders at a price equal to the greater of 100% of principal or the sum of the present value of the remaining scheduled payments of principal and interest discounted at the then-current treasury rate plus an applicable spread.

⁽²⁾	Senior notes issued by our majority-owned subsidiary, Genworth MI Canada Inc.

⁽³⁾	Subordinated floating rate notes issued by our indirect wholly-owned subsidiary, Genworth Financial Mortgage Insurance Pty Limited.

GENWORTH FINANCIAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

In January 2016, Genworth Holdings redeemed $298 million of its 8.625% senior notes due 2016 issued in December 2009 (the “2016 Notes”) and paid a make-whole premium of approximately $20 million pre-tax in addition to accrued and unpaid interest.

During the three months ended March 31, 2016, we also repurchased $28 million principal amount of Genworth Holdings’ notes with various maturity dates for a pre-tax gain of $4 million and paid accrued and unpaid interest thereon.

On March 18, 2016, Genworth Holdings received the requisite consents, pursuant to a solicitation of consents (the “Consent Solicitation”), to amend the indenture dated as of June 15, 2004, by and between Genworth Holdings and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A. (the “Trustee”), as successor to JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., as amended and supplemented from time to time (as so amended and supplemented, the “Senior Notes Indenture”) and the indenture dated as of November 14, 2006, by and between Genworth Holdings and the Trustee, as amended and supplemented from time to time (as so amended and supplemented, the “Subordinated Notes Indenture” and together with the Senior Notes Indenture, the “Indentures”).

On March 18, 2016, Genworth Holdings, Genworth Financial, as guarantor, and the Trustee entered into Supplemental Indenture No. 12 to the Senior Notes Indenture and the Third Supplemental Indenture to the Subordinated Notes Indenture (the “Supplemental Indentures”) that amended the Senior Notes Indenture and the Subordinated Notes Indenture, respectively, to (i) exclude Genworth Life Insurance Company, Genworth Life Insurance Company of New York and Brookfield Life and Annuity Insurance Company Limited, which operate our long-term care insurance business, from the event of default provisions of the Indentures and (ii) clarify that one or more transactions disposing of any or all of the Genworth Holdings’ long-term care and other life insurance businesses and assets (a “Life Sale”) would not constitute a disposition of “all or substantially all” of Genworth Holdings’ assets under the Indentures, provided that in order to rely on that clarification, the assets of our U.S. Mortgage Insurance segment would be contributed to Genworth Holdings and 80% of any Net Cash Proceeds, as defined in the Supplemental Indentures, to us from any Life Sale would be used to reduce outstanding indebtedness.

The Supplemental Indentures became operative on March 22, 2016 upon the payment of the applicable consent fees payable under the terms of the Consent Solicitation. We paid total fees related to the Consent Solicitation of approximately $61 million, including bond consent fees of $43 million, which were deferred, as well as broker, advisor and investment banking fees of $18 million, which were expensed, in the first quarter of 2016.

GENWORTH FINANCIAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

(c) Non-Recourse Funding Obligations

The following table sets forth the non-recourse funding obligations (surplus notes) of our wholly-owned, special purpose consolidated captive insurance subsidiaries as of the dates indicated:


(Amounts in millions)	March 31,			December 31,
Issuance	2016			2015
River Lake Insurance Company (a), due 2033	$	—		$	570
River Lake Insurance Company (b), due 2033		—			405
River Lake Insurance Company II (a), due 2035		—			192
River Lake Insurance Company II (b), due 2035		—			453
Rivermont Life Insurance Company I (a), due 2050		315			315


Subtotal		315			1,935
Deferred borrowing charges		(5	)		(15	)


Total	$	310		$	1,920

⁽¹⁾	Accrual of interest based on one-month London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) that resets every 28 days plus a fixed margin.

^(b)	Accrual of interest based on one-month LIBOR that resets on a specified date each month plus a contractual margin.

During the three months ended March 31, 2016, in connection with a life block transaction, River Lake Insurance Company, our indirect wholly-owned subsidiary, redeemed $975 million of its total outstanding floating rate subordinated notes due in 2033 and River Lake Insurance Company II, our indirect wholly-owned subsidiary, redeemed $645 million of its total outstanding floating rate subordinated notes due in 2035 for a pre-tax loss of $9 million from the write-off of deferred borrowing costs.

(d) Repurchase agreements and securities lending activity

Repurchase agreements

We have a repurchase program in which we sell an investment security at a specified price and agree to repurchase that security at another specified price at a later date. Repurchase agreements are treated as collateralized financing transactions and are carried at the amounts at which the securities will be subsequently reacquired, including accrued interest, as specified in the respective agreement. The market value of securities to be repurchased is monitored and collateral levels are adjusted where appropriate to protect the parties against credit exposure. Cash received is invested in fixed maturity securities. As of March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, the fair value of securities pledged under the repurchase program was $32 million and $231 million, respectively, and the repurchase obligation of $29 million and $229 million, respectively, was included in other liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets.

Securities lending activity

GENWORTH FINANCIAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

Under the securities lending program in the United States, the borrower is required to provide collateral, which can consist of cash or government securities, on a daily basis in amounts equal to or exceeding 102% of the value of the loaned securities. Currently, we only accept cash collateral from borrowers under the program. Cash collateral received by us on securities lending transactions is reflected in other invested assets with an offsetting liability recognized in other liabilities for the obligation to return the collateral. Any cash collateral received is reinvested by our custodian based upon the investment guidelines provided within our agreement. In the United States, the reinvested cash collateral is primarily invested in a money market fund approved by the National Association of Insurance Commissioners, U.S. and foreign government securities, U.S. government agency securities, asset-backed securities and corporate debt securities. As of March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, the fair value of securities loaned under our securities lending program in the United States was $401 million and $334 million, respectively. As of March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, the fair value of collateral held under our securities lending program in the United States was $415 million and $347 million, respectively, and the offsetting obligation to return collateral of $415 million and $347 million, respectively, was included in other liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets. We did not have any non-cash collateral provided by the borrowers in our securities lending program in the United States as of March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015.

Under our securities lending program in Canada, the borrower is required to provide collateral consisting of government securities on a daily basis in amounts equal to or exceeding 105% of the fair value of the applicable securities loaned. Securities received from counterparties as collateral are not recorded on our consolidated balance sheet given that the risk and rewards of ownership is not transferred from the counterparties to us in the course of such transactions. Additionally, there was no cash collateral because it is not permitted as an acceptable form of collateral under the program. In Canada, the lending institution must be included on the approved Securities Lending Borrowers List with the Canadian regulator and the intermediary must be rated at least “AA-” by Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC. As of March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, the fair value of securities loaned under our securities lending program in Canada was $324 million and $340 million, respectively.

Risks associated with repurchase agreements and securities lending programs

Our repurchase agreement and securities lending programs expose us to liquidity risk if we did not have enough cash or collateral readily available to return to the counterparty when required to do so under the agreements. We manage this risk by regularly monitoring our available sources of cash and collateral to ensure we can meet short-term liquidity demands under normal and stressed scenarios.

We are also exposed to credit risk in the event of default of our counterparties or changes in collateral values. This risk is significantly reduced because our programs require over collateralization and collateral exposures are trued up on a daily basis. We manage this risk by using multiple counterparties and ensuring that changes in required collateral are monitored and adjusted daily. We also monitor the creditworthiness, including credit ratings, of our counterparties on a regular basis.

GENWORTH FINANCIAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

Contractual maturity

The following tables present the remaining contractual maturity of the agreements as of the dates indicated:


	March 31, 2016
(Amounts in millions)	Overnight and continuous		Up to 30 days		31 - 90 days		Greater than 90 days		Total
Repurchase agreements:
U.S. government, agencies and government-sponsored enterprises	$	—	$	29	$	—	$	—	$	29
Securities lending:
Fixed maturity securities:
U.S. government, agencies and government-sponsored enterprises		9		—		—		—		9
Non-U.S. government		60		—		—		—		60
U.S. corporate		120		—		—		—		120
Non-U.S. corporate		219		—		—		—		219

Subtotal, fixed maturity securities		408		—		—		—		408

Equity securities		7		—		—		—		7

Total securities lending		415		—		—		—		415

Total repurchase agreements and securities lending	$	415	$	29	$	—	$	—	$	444


	December 31, 2015
(Amounts in millions)	Overnight and continuous		Up to 30 days		31 - 90 days		Greater than 90 days		Total
Repurchase agreements:
U.S. government, agencies and government-sponsored enterprises	$	—	$	58	$	25	$	146	$	229
Securities lending:
Fixed maturity securities:
U.S. government, agencies and government-sponsored enterprises		18		—		—		—		18
Non-U.S. government		39		—		—		—		39
U.S. corporate		95		—		—		—		95
Non-U.S. corporate		190		—		—		—		190

Subtotal, fixed maturity securities		342		—		—		—		342

Equity securities		5		—		—		—		5

Total securities lending		347		—		—		—		347

Total repurchase agreements and securities lending	$	347	$	58	$	25	$	146	$	576

GENWORTH FINANCIAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

(8) Income Taxes

The reconciliation of the federal statutory tax rate to the effective income tax rate was as follows for the periods indicated:


	Three months ended March 31,
(Amounts in millions)	2016					2015
Pre-tax income	$	150				$	294

Statutory U.S. federal income tax rate	$	53		35.0	%	$	103		35.0	%
Increase (reduction) in rate resulting from:
State income tax, net of federal income tax effect		1		0.8			5		1.5
Benefit on tax favored investments		(1	)	(0.6	)		(3	)	(0.9	)
Effect of foreign operations		(6	)	(4.0	)		(16	)	(5.5	)
Reversal of valuation allowance		(25	)	(16.5	)		—		—
Non-deductible expenses		—		—			1		0.3
Stock-based compensation		3		1.7			1		0.5
Loss on sale of business		(2	)	(1.2	)		—		—

Effective rate	$	23		15.2	%	$	91		30.9	%

The effective tax rate for the three months ended March 31, 2016 was impacted by the reversal of a deferred tax valuation allowance related to our mortgage insurance business in Europe due to newly expected taxable gains supporting the recognition of these deferred tax assets in the current year.

(9) Segment Information

Beginning in the fourth quarter of 2015, we changed how we review our operating businesses and no longer have separate reporting divisions. Under our new structure, we have the following five operating business segments: U.S. Mortgage Insurance; Canada Mortgage Insurance; Australia Mortgage Insurance; U.S Life Insurance (which includes our long-term care insurance, life insurance and fixed annuities businesses); and Runoff (which includes the results of non-strategic products which are no longer actively sold). In addition to our five operating business segments, we also have Corporate and Other activities which include debt financing expenses that are incurred at the Genworth Holdings level, unallocated corporate income and expenses, eliminations of inter-segment transactions and the results of other businesses that are managed outside of our operating segments, including certain smaller international mortgage insurance businesses and discontinued operations. Financial information has been updated for all periods to reflect the reorganized segment reporting structure.

We allocate our consolidated provision for income taxes to our operating segments. Our allocation methodology applies a specific tax rate to the pre-tax income (loss) of each segment, which is then adjusted in each segment to reflect the tax attributes of items unique to that segment such as foreign income. The difference between the consolidated provision for income taxes and the sum of the provision for income taxes in each segment is reflected in Corporate and Other activities. The annually-determined tax rates and adjustments to each segment’s provision for income taxes are estimates which are subject to review and could change from year to year.

We use the same accounting policies and procedures to measure segment income (loss) and assets as our consolidated net income and assets. Our chief operating decision maker evaluates segment performance and

GENWORTH FINANCIAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

allocates resources on the basis of “net operating income (loss).” We define net operating income (loss) as income (loss) from continuing operations excluding the after-tax effects of income attributable to noncontrolling interests, net investment gains (losses), goodwill impairments, gains (losses) on the sale of businesses, gains (losses) on the early extinguishment of debt, gains (losses) on insurance block transactions, restructuring costs and infrequent or unusual non-operating items. Gains (losses) on insurance block transactions are defined as gains (losses) on the early extinguishment of non-recourse funding obligations, early termination fees for other financing restructuring and/or resulting gains (losses) on reinsurance restructuring for certain blocks of business. We exclude net investment gains (losses) and infrequent or unusual non-operating items because we do not consider them to be related to the operating performance of our segments and Corporate and Other activities. A component of our net investment gains (losses) is the result of impairments, the size and timing of which can vary significantly depending on market credit cycles. In addition, the size and timing of other investment gains (losses) can be subject to our discretion and are influenced by market opportunities, as well as asset-liability matching considerations. Goodwill impairments, gains (losses) on the sale of businesses, gains (losses) on the early extinguishment of debt, gains (losses) on insurance block transactions and restructuring costs are also excluded from net operating income (loss) because, in our opinion, they are not indicative of overall operating trends. Infrequent or unusual non-operating items are also excluded from net operating income (loss) if, in our opinion, they are not indicative of overall operating trends.

While some of these items may be significant components of net income (loss) available to Genworth Financial, Inc.’s common stockholders in accordance with U.S. GAAP, we believe that net operating income (loss), and measures that are derived from or incorporate net operating income (loss), are appropriate measures that are useful to investors because they identify the income (loss) attributable to the ongoing operations of the business. Management also uses net operating income (loss) as a basis for determining awards and compensation for senior management and to evaluate performance on a basis comparable to that used by analysts. However, the items excluded from net operating income (loss) have occurred in the past and could, and in some cases will, recur in the future. Net operating income (loss) is not a substitute for net income (loss) available to Genworth Financial, Inc.’s common stockholders determined in accordance with U.S. GAAP. In addition, our definition of net operating income (loss) may differ from the definitions used by other companies.

In the first quarter of 2016, we recorded an estimated gain of $20 million, net of taxes, related to the planned sale of our mortgage insurance business in Europe.

In January 2016, we paid a make-whole expense of $13 million, net of taxes, related to the early redemption of Genworth Holdings’ 2016 Notes. We also repurchased $28 million principal amount of Genworth Holdings’ notes with various maturity dates for a gain of $2 million, net of taxes, in the first quarter of 2016. These transactions were excluded for net operating income for the periods presented as they related to a gain (loss) on the early extinguishment of debt.

In the first quarter of 2016, we completed a life block transaction resulting in an after-tax loss of $6 million in connection the early extinguishment of non-recourse funding obligations.

In the first quarter of 2016, we recorded an after-tax expense of $9 million related to restructuring costs as part of an expense reduction plan as we evaluate and appropriately size our organizational needs and expenses.

There were no infrequent or unusual items excluded from net operating income during the periods presented other than fees incurred during the first quarter of 2016 related to Genworth Holdings’ bond consent solicitation of $12 million, net of taxes, for broker, advisor and investment banking fees.

GENWORTH FINANCIAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) attributable to Genworth Financial, Inc.’s common stockholders and net operating income (loss) assume a 35% tax rate and are net of the portion attributable to noncontrolling interests. Net investment gains (losses) are also adjusted for deferred acquisition costs and other intangible amortization and certain benefit reserves.

The following is a summary of revenues for our segments and Corporate and Other activities for the periods indicated:


	Three months ended March 31,
(Amounts in millions)	2016			2015
Revenues:
U.S. Mortgage Insurance segment’s revenues	$	175		$	170

Canada Mortgage Insurance segment’s revenues		160			136

Australia Mortgage Insurance segment’s revenues		105			118

U.S. Life Insurance segment:
Long-term care insurance		952			905
Life insurance		123			487
Fixed annuities		206			233

U.S. Life Insurance segment’s revenues		1,281			1,625

Runoff segment’s revenues		69			74

Corporate and Other’s revenues		(5	)		12

Total revenues	$	1,785		$	2,135

GENWORTH FINANCIAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

The following is a summary of net operating income for our segments and Corporate and Other activities and a reconciliation of net operating income for our segments and Corporate and Other activities to net income available to Genworth Financial, Inc.’s common stockholders for the periods indicated:


	Three months ended March 31,
(Amounts in millions)	2016			2015
U.S. Mortgage Insurance segment’s net operating income	$	61		$	52

Canada Mortgage Insurance segment’s net operating income		33			40

Australia Mortgage Insurance segment’s net operating income		19			30

U.S. Life Insurance segment:
Long-term care insurance		34			10
Life insurance		31			40
Fixed annuities		26			31

U.S. Life Insurance segment’s net operating income		91			81

Runoff segment’s net operating income		4			11

Corporate and Other’s net operating loss		(105	)		(60	)

Net operating income		103			154
Net investment gains (losses), net		(13	)		(1	)
Gains (losses) on sale of businesses, net		20			—
Gains (losses) on early extinguishment of debt, net		(11	)		—
Gains (losses) from life block transactions, net		(6	)		—
Expenses related to restructuring, net		(9	)		—
Fees associated with bond consent solicitation, net		(12	)		—

Income from continuing operations available to Genworth Financial, Inc.’s common stockholders		72			153
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests		55			50

Income from continuing operations		127			203
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of taxes		(19	)		1

Net income		108			204
Less: net income attributable to noncontrolling interests		55			50

Net income available to Genworth Financial, Inc.’s common stockholders	$	53		$	154

GENWORTH FINANCIAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

The following is a summary of total assets for our segments and Corporate and Other activities as of the dates indicated:


	March 31,		December 31,
(Amounts in millions)	2016		2015
Assets:
U.S. Mortgage Insurance	$	2,367	$	2,899
Canada Mortgage Insurance		4,727		4,520
Australia Mortgage Insurance		3,053		2,987
U.S. Life Insurance		82,410		79,530
Runoff		11,729		12,115
Corporate and Other		2,756		4,253

Segment assets from continuing operations		107,042		106,304
Assets held for sale		131		127

Total assets	$	107,173	$	106,431

(10) Commitments and Contingencies

(a) Litigation and Regulatory Matters

We face the risk of litigation and regulatory investigations and actions in the ordinary course of operating our businesses, including the risk of class action lawsuits. Our pending legal and regulatory actions include proceedings specific to us and others generally applicable to business practices in the industries in which we operate. In our insurance operations, we are, have been, or may become subject to class actions and individual suits alleging, among other things, issues relating to sales or underwriting practices, increases to in-force long-term care insurance premiums, payment of contingent or other sales commissions, claims payments and procedures, product design, product disclosure, administration, additional premium charges for premiums paid on a periodic basis, denial or delay of benefits, charging excessive or impermissible fees on products, recommending unsuitable products to customers, our pricing structures and business practices in our mortgage insurance businesses, such as captive reinsurance arrangements with lenders and contract underwriting services, violations of the Real Estate Settlement and Procedures Act of 1974 or related state anti-inducement laws, and mortgage insurance policy rescissions and curtailments, and breaching fiduciary or other duties to customers, including but not limited to breach of customer information. Plaintiffs in class action and other lawsuits against us may seek very large or indeterminate amounts which may remain unknown for substantial periods of time. In our investment-related operations, we are subject to litigation involving commercial disputes with counterparties. We are also subject to litigation arising out of our general business activities such as our contractual and employment relationships and securities lawsuits. In addition, we are also subject to various regulatory inquiries, such as information requests, subpoenas, books and record examinations and market conduct and financial examinations from state, federal and international regulators and other authorities. A substantial legal liability or a significant regulatory action against us could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Moreover, even if we ultimately prevail in the litigation, regulatory action or investigation, we could suffer significant reputational harm, which could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.

In August 2014, Genworth Financial, Inc., its current chief executive officer and its then current chief financial officer were named in a putative class action lawsuit captioned Manuel Esguerra v. Genworth Financial, Inc., et al, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. Plaintiff alleged

GENWORTH FINANCIAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

securities law violations involving certain disclosures in 2013 and 2014 concerning Genworth’s long-term care insurance reserves. The lawsuit sought unspecified compensatory damages, costs and expenses, including counsel fees and expert fees. In October 2014, a putative class action lawsuit captioned City of Pontiac General Employees’ Retirement System v. Genworth Financial, Inc., et al., was filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia. This lawsuit names the same defendants, alleges the same securities law violations, seeks the same damages and covers the same class as the Esguerra lawsuit. Following the filing of the City of Pontiac lawsuit, the Esguerra lawsuit was voluntarily dismissed without prejudice allowing the City of Pontiac lawsuit to proceed. In the City of Pontiac lawsuit, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia appointed Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Alberta and Fresno County Employees’ Retirement Association as lead plaintiffs and designated the caption of the action as In re Genworth Financial, Inc. Securities Litigation. On December 22, 2014, the lead plaintiffs filed an amended complaint. On February 5, 2015, we filed a motion to dismiss plaintiffs’ amended complaint. On May 1, 2015, the court denied the motion to dismiss. We engaged in mediation in the fourth quarter of 2015, continuing into the first quarter of 2016, and previously accrued $25 million in connection with this matter, which was the amount of our self-insured retention on our executive and organizational liability insurance program. On March 11, 2016, in connection with the mediation, we reached an agreement in principle to settle the action. On April 1, 2016, the parties entered into a stipulation and agreement of settlement. The settlement provides for a full release of all defendants in connection with the allegations made in the lawsuit. We believe that the plaintiffs’ claims are without merit, but we are settling the lawsuit to avoid the burden, risk and expense of further litigation. The agreement provides for a settlement payment to the class of $219 million, inclusive of all plaintiffs’ attorneys fees and expenses and settlement costs, of which $150 million will be paid by our insurance carriers, and $69 million pre-tax will be paid by Genworth. Our payment was made into an escrow account during the first quarter of 2016. We also incurred additional legal fees and expenses of approximately $10 million pre-tax, for a total additional pre-tax incurred amount of $79 million in the first quarter of 2016. On April 13, 2016, the Court granted plaintiffs’ motion for preliminary approval of the settlement, provisional certification of the class for settlement purposes only, and issuance of notice to settlement class members. The settlement remains subject to final court approval. The Court has scheduled a hearing on July 20, 2016 to consider final approval of the settlement. In the event the settlement is approved by the court, it will exhaust all coverage available to Genworth under our 2014 executive and organizational liability insurance program. Therefore, Genworth does not have coverage under the program to pay any future settlements or judgments in relation to litigation brought during the 2014 policy year, including the City of Hialeah Employees’ Retirement System v. Genworth Financial, Inc., et al., case discussed below.

In April 2014, Genworth Financial, Inc., its former chief executive officer and its then current chief financial officer were named in a putative class action lawsuit captioned City of Hialeah Employees’ Retirement System v. Genworth Financial, Inc., et al., in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. Plaintiff alleges securities law violations involving certain disclosures in 2012 concerning Genworth’s Australian mortgage insurance business, including our plans for an initial public offering of the business. The lawsuit seeks unspecified damages, costs and attorneys’ fees and such equitable/injunctive relief as the court may deem proper. The United States District Court for the Southern District of New York appointed City of Hialeah Employees’ Retirement System and New Bedford Contributory Retirement System as lead plaintiffs and designated the caption of the action as In re Genworth Financial, Inc. Securities Litigation. On October 3, 2014, the lead plaintiffs filed an amended complaint. On December 2, 2014, we filed a motion to dismiss plaintiffs’ amended complaint. On March 25, 2015, the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York denied the motion but entered an order dismissing the amended complaint with leave to replead. On April 17, 2015, plaintiffs filed a second amended complaint. We filed a motion to dismiss the second amended complaint and on June 16, 2015, the court denied the motion to dismiss. On January 22, 2016, we filed a motion for reconsideration of the court’s June 16, 2015 order denying our motion to dismiss which the court denied on

GENWORTH FINANCIAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

March 3, 2016. On January 29, 2016, plaintiffs filed a motion for class certification which we opposed. On March 7, 2016, the court granted plaintiffs’ motion for class certification. We intend to vigorously defend this action. As discussed above, we have exhausted all coverage under our 2014 executive and organizational liability insurance program applicable to this case; therefore, there is no insurance coverage for Genworth with respect to any settlement or judgment amount related to this litigation.

In January 2016, Genworth Financial, Inc., its current chief executive officer, its former chief executive officer, its former chief financial officer and the current members of its board of directors were named in a shareholder derivative suit filed by International Union of Operating Engineers Local No. 478 Pension Fund, Richard L. Salberg and David Pinkoski in the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware. The case is captioned Int’l Union of Operating Engineers Local No. 478 Pension Fund, et al v. McInerney, et al. In February 2016, Genworth Financial, Inc., its current Chief Executive Officer, its former Chief Executive Officer, its former Chief Financial Officer and the current members of its board of directors were named in a second shareholder derivative suit filed by Martin Cohen in the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware. The case is captioned Cohen v. McInerney, et al. On February 23, 2016, the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware consolidated these derivative suits under the caption Genworth Financial, Inc. Consolidated Derivative Litigation. On March 28, 2016, plaintiffs in the consolidated action filed an amended complaint. The amended complaint alleges breaches of fiduciary duties concerning Genworth’s long-term care insurance reserves and concerning Genworth’s Australian mortgage insurance business, including our plans for an initial public offering of the business and seeks unspecified damages, costs, attorneys’ fees and such equitable relief as the court may deem proper. The amended consolidated complaint also adds Genworth’s current Chief Financial Officer as a defendant, based on the current Chief Financial Officer’s alleged conduct in her former capacity as Genworth’s Controller and principal accounting officer. We intend to move to dismiss the consolidated action.

At this time, other than as noted above, we cannot determine or predict the ultimate outcome of any of the pending legal and regulatory matters specifically identified above or the likelihood of potential future legal and regulatory matters against us. Except as disclosed above, we also are not able to provide an estimate or range of reasonably possible losses related to these matters. Therefore, we cannot ensure that the current investigations and proceedings will not have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations. In addition, it is possible that related investigations and proceedings may be commenced in the future, and we could become subject to additional unrelated investigations and lawsuits. Increased regulatory scrutiny and any resulting investigations or proceedings could result in new legal precedents and industry-wide regulations or practices that could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

(b) Commitments

As of March 31, 2016, we were committed to fund $143 million in limited partnership investments, $45 million in U.S. commercial mortgage loan investments and $46 million in private placement investments.

GENWORTH FINANCIAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

(11) Changes in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)

The following tables show the changes in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of taxes, by component as of and for the periods indicated:


(Amounts in millions)	Net unrealized investment gains (losses)⁽¹⁾		Derivatives qualifying as hedges⁽²⁾			Foreign currency translation and other adjustments			Total
Balances as of January 1, 2016	$	1,254	$	2,045		$	(289	)	$	3,010
OCI before reclassifications		791		275			216			1,282
Amounts reclassified from (to) OCI		12		(18	)		—			(6	)

Current period OCI		803		257			216			1,276

Balances as of March 31, 2016 before noncontrolling interests		2,057		2,302			(73	)		4,286

Less: change in OCI attributable to noncontrolling interests		—		—			101			101

Balances as of March 31, 2016	$	2,057	$	2,302		$	(174	)	$	4,185

⁽¹⁾	Net of adjustments to deferred acquisition costs, present value of future profits, sales inducements and benefit reserves. See note 4 for additional information.

⁽²⁾	See note 5 for additional information.


(Amounts in millions)	Net unrealized investment gains (losses)⁽¹⁾		Derivatives qualifying as hedges⁽²⁾			Foreign currency translation and other adjustments			Total
Balances as of January 1, 2015	$	2,453	$	2,070		$	(77	)	$	4,446
OCI before reclassifications		325		195			(370	)		150
Amounts reclassified from (to) OCI		—		(18	)		—			(18	)

Current period OCI		325		177			(370	)		132

Balances as of March 31, 2015 before noncontrolling interests		2,778		2,247			(447	)		4,578

Less: change in OCI attributable to noncontrolling interests		30		—			(144	)		(114	)

Balances as of March 31, 2015	$	2,748	$	2,247		$	(303	)	$	4,692

⁽¹⁾	Net of adjustments to deferred acquisition costs, present value of future profits, sales inducements and benefit reserves. See note 4 for additional information.

⁽²⁾	See note 5 for additional information.

The foreign currency translation and other adjustments balance included $5 million and $32 million, respectively, net of taxes of $3 million and $14 million, respectively, related to a net unrecognized postretirement benefit obligation as of March 31, 2016 and 2015. Amount also included taxes of $(45) million and $(91) million, respectively, related to foreign currency translation adjustments as of March 31, 2016 and 2015.

GENWORTH FINANCIAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

The following table shows reclassifications in (out) of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of taxes, for the periods presented:


	Amount reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)						Affected line item in the consolidated statements of income
	Three months ended March 31,

(Amounts in millions)	2016			2015

Net unrealized investment (gains) losses:
Unrealized (gains) losses on investments ⁽¹⁾	$	18		$	—		Net investment (gains) losses
Provision for income taxes		(6	)		—		Provision for income taxes


Total	$	12		$	—


Derivatives qualifying as hedges:
Interest rate swaps hedging assets	$	(25	)	$	(19	)	Net investment income
Interest rate swaps hedging assets		(1	)		—		Net investment (gains) losses
Inflation indexed swaps		(2	)		(9	)	Net investment income
Provision for income taxes		10			10		Provision for income taxes

Total	$	(18	)	$	(18	)

⁽¹⁾	Amounts exclude adjustments to deferred acquisition costs, present value of future profits, sales inducements and benefit reserves.

(12) Sale of Businesses

European mortgage insurance business

On October 27, 2015, we announced that Genworth Mortgage Insurance Corporation, our wholly-owned indirect subsidiary, has entered into an agreement to sell our European mortgage insurance business to AmTrust Financial Services, Inc., which is currently expected to result in net proceeds of approximately $50 million. In the first quarter of 2016, we recorded an estimated pre-tax loss of $7 million and a tax benefit of $27 million primarily related to the reversal of a deferred tax valuation allowance, for a net after-tax gain of $20 million. The transaction is expected to close in the second quarter of 2016 and is subject to customary conditions, including requisite regulatory approvals.

GENWORTH FINANCIAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

The major assets and liability categories of our European mortgage insurance business were as follows as of the dates indicated:


(Amounts in millions)	March 31, 2016			December 31, 2015
Assets
Investments:
Fixed maturity securities available-for-sale, at fair value	$	198		$	195
Other invested assets		2			6

Total investments		200			201
Cash and cash equivalents		41			28
Accrued investment income		3			3
Reinsurance recoverable		22			21
Other assets		12			14

Assets held for sale		278			267
Fair value less closing costs impairment		(147	)		(140	)

Total assets held for sale	$	131		$	127

Liabilities
Liability for policy and contract claims	$	59		$	56
Unearned premiums		61			58
Other liabilities		11			12
Deferred tax liability		—			1

Liabilities held for sale	$	131		$	127

Deferred tax liabilities that result in future taxable or deductible amounts to the remaining consolidated group have been reflected in liabilities of continuing operations and not reflected in liabilities held for sale.

Lifestyle protection insurance

On December 1, 2015, we completed the sale of our lifestyle protection insurance business and received approximately $493 million with net proceeds of approximately $400 million, subject to the finalization of closing balance sheet purchase price adjustments expected in the second quarter of 2016. During the first quarter of 2016, we recorded an additional after-tax loss of approximately $19 million primarily related to claim liabilities and taxes we retain.

We retained liabilities for the U.K. pension plan as well as taxes and certain claims and sales practices that occurred while we owned the lifestyle protection insurance business. We have established our current best estimates for these liabilities, where appropriate; however, there may be future adjustments to these estimates.

(13) Condensed Consolidating Financial Information

Genworth Financial provides a full and unconditional guarantee to the trustee of Genworth Holdings’ outstanding senior notes and the holders of the senior notes, on an unsecured unsubordinated basis, of the full and

GENWORTH FINANCIAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

punctual payment of the principal of, premium, if any and interest on, and all other amounts payable under, each outstanding series of senior notes, and the full and punctual payment of all other amounts payable by Genworth Holdings under the senior notes indenture in respect of such senior notes. Genworth Financial also provides a full and unconditional guarantee to the trustee of Genworth Holdings’ outstanding subordinated notes and the holders of the subordinated notes, on an unsecured subordinated basis, of the full and punctual payment of the principal of, premium, if any and interest on, and all other amounts payable under, the outstanding subordinated notes, and the full and punctual payment of all other amounts payable by Genworth Holdings under the subordinated notes indenture in respect of the subordinated notes. Genworth Holdings is a direct, 100% owned subsidiary of Genworth Financial.

The following condensed consolidating financial information of Genworth Financial and its direct and indirect subsidiaries have been prepared pursuant to rules regarding the preparation of consolidating financial information of Regulation S-X. The condensed consolidating financial information has been prepared as if the guarantee had been in place during the periods presented herein.

The condensed consolidating financial information presents the condensed consolidating balance sheet information as of March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, the condensed consolidating income statement information and the condensed consolidating comprehensive income statement information for the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015 and the condensed consolidating cash flow statement information for the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015.

The condensed consolidating financial information reflects Genworth Financial (“Parent Guarantor”), Genworth Holdings (“Issuer”) and each of Genworth Financial’s other direct and indirect subsidiaries (the “All Other Subsidiaries”) on a combined basis, none of which guarantee the senior notes or subordinated notes, as well as the eliminations necessary to present Genworth Financial’s financial information on a consolidated basis and total consolidated amounts.

The accompanying condensed consolidating financial information is presented based on the equity method of accounting for all periods presented. Under this method, investments in subsidiaries are recorded at cost and adjusted for the subsidiaries’ cumulative results of operations, capital contributions and distributions, and other changes in equity. Elimination entries include consolidating and eliminating entries for investments in subsidiaries and intercompany activity.

GENWORTH FINANCIAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

The following table presents the condensed consolidating balance sheet information as of March 31, 2016:


(Amounts in millions)	Parent Guarantor			Issuer			All Other Subsidiaries			Eliminations			Consolidated
Assets
Investments:
Fixed maturity securities available-for-sale, at fair value	$	—		$	—		$	60,490		$	(200	)	$	60,290
Equity securities available-for-sale, at fair value		—			—			431			—			431
Commercial mortgage loans		—			—			6,179			—			6,179
Restricted commercial mortgage loans related to securitization entities		—			—			155			—			155
Policy loans		—			—			1,565			—			1,565
Other invested assets		—			5			2,927			(9	)		2,923
Restricted other invested assets related to securitization entities, at fair value		—			—			422			—			422
Investments in subsidiaries		14,108			14,197			—			(28,305	)		—

Total investments		14,108			14,202			72,169			(28,514	)		71,965

Cash and cash equivalents		—			760			3,283			—			4,043
Accrued investment income		—			—			720			—			720
Deferred acquisition costs		—			—			4,235			—			4,235
Intangible assets and goodwill		—			—			291			—			291
Reinsurance recoverable		—			—			17,587			—			17,587
Other assets		(4	)		265			317			(1	)		577
Intercompany notes receivable		—			68			392			(460	)		—
Separate account assets		—			—			7,624			—			7,624
Assets held for sale		—			—			131			—			131

Total assets	$	14,104		$	15,295		$	106,749		$	(28,975	)	$	107,173

Liabilities and equity
Liabilities:
Future policy benefits	$	—		$	—		$	36,776		$	—		$	36,776
Policyholder account balances		—			—			26,354			—			26,354
Liability for policy and contract claims		—			—			8,177			—			8,177
Unearned premiums		—			—			3,378			—			3,378
Other liabilities		11			340			3,256			(11	)		3,596
Intercompany notes payable		68			592			—			(660	)		—
Borrowings related to securitization entities		—			—			173			—			173
Non-recourse funding obligations		—			—			310			—			310
Long-term borrowings		—			3,711			521			—			4,232
Deferred tax liability		(30	)		(1,099	)		1,578			—			449
Separate account liabilities		—			—			7,624			—			7,624
Liabilities held for sale		—			—			131			—			131

Total liabilities		49			3,544			88,278			(671	)		91,200

Equity:
Common stock		1			—			—			—			1
Additional paid-in capital		11,952			9,098			17,034			(26,132	)		11,952
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)		4,185			4,242			4,224			(8,466	)		4,185
Retained earnings		617			(1,589	)		(5,005	)		6,594			617
Treasury stock, at cost		(2,700	)		—			—			—			(2,700	)

Total Genworth Financial, Inc.’s stockholders’ equity	14,055			11,751			16,253			(28,004)			14,055
Noncontrolling interests		—			—			2,218			(300	)		1,918

Total equity		14,055			11,751			18,471			(28,304	)		15,973

Total liabilities and equity	$	14,104		$	15,295		$	106,749		$	(28,975	)	$	107,173

GENWORTH FINANCIAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

The following table presents the condensed consolidating balance sheet information as of December 31, 2015:


(Amounts in millions)	Parent Guarantor			Issuer			All Other Subsidiaries			Eliminations			Consolidated
Assets
Investments:
Fixed maturity securities available-for-sale, at fair value	$	—		$	150		$	58,247		$	(200	)	$	58,197
Equity securities available-for-sale, at fair value		—			—			310			—			310
Commercial mortgage loans		—			—			6,170			—			6,170
Restricted commercial mortgage loans related to securitization entities		—			—			161			—			161
Policy loans		—			—			1,568			—			1,568
Other invested assets		—			114			2,198			(3	)		2,309
Restricted other invested assets related to securitization entities, at fair value		—			—			413			—			413
Investments in subsidiaries		12,814			12,989			—			(25,803	)		—

Total investments		12,814			13,253			69,067			(26,006	)		69,128

Cash and cash equivalents		—			1,124			4,841			—			5,965
Accrued investment income		—			—			657			(4	)		653
Deferred acquisition costs		—			—			4,398			—			4,398
Intangible assets and goodwill		—			—			357			—			357
Reinsurance recoverable		—			—			17,245			—			17,245
Other assets		—			199			323			(2	)		520
Intercompany notes receivable		—			2			458			(460	)		—
Deferred tax assets		25			1,038			(908	)		—			155
Separate account assets		—			—			7,883			—			7,883
Assets held for sale		—			—			127			—			127

Total assets	$	12,839		$	15,616		$	104,448		$	(26,472	)	$	106,431

Liabilities and equity
Liabilities:
Future policy benefits	$	—		$	—		$	36,475		$	—		$	36,475
Policyholder account balances		—			—			26,209			—			26,209
Liability for policy and contract claims		—			—			8,095			—			8,095
Unearned premiums		—			—			3,308			—			3,308
Other liabilities		13			279			2,722			(10	)		3,004
Intercompany notes payable		2			658			—			(660	)		—
Borrowings related to securitization entities		—			—			179			—			179
Non-recourse funding obligations		—			—			1,920			—			1,920
Long-term borrowings		—			4,078			492			—			4,570
Deferred tax liability		—			—			24			—			24
Separate account liabilities		—			—			7,883			—			7,883
Liabilities held for sale		—			—			127			—			127

Total liabilities		15			5,015			87,434			(670	)		91,794

Equity:
Common stock		1			—			—			—			1
Additional paid-in capital		11,949			9,097			17,007			(26,104	)		11,949
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)		3,010			3,116			3,028			(6,144	)		3,010
Retained earnings		564			(1,612	)		(5,134	)		6,746			564
Treasury stock, at cost		(2,700	)		—			—			—			(2,700	)

Total Genworth Financial, Inc.’s stockholders’ equity		12,824			10,601			14,901			(25,502	)		12,824
Noncontrolling interests		—			—			2,113			(300	)		1,813

Total equity		12,824			10,601			17,014			(25,802	)		14,637

Total liabilities and equity	$	12,839		$	15,616		$	104,448		$	(26,472	)	$	106,431

GENWORTH FINANCIAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

The following table presents the condensed consolidating income statement information for the three months ended March 31, 2016:


(Amounts in millions)	Parent Guarantor			Issuer			All Other Subsidiaries			Eliminations			Consolidated
Revenues:
Premiums	$	—		$	—		$	794		$	—		$	794
Net investment income		(1	)		(1	)		795			(4	)		789
Net investment gains (losses)		—			(15	)		(4	)		—			(19	)
Policy fees and other income		—			(4	)		225			—			221

Total revenues		(1	)		(20	)		1,810			(4	)		1,785

Benefits and expenses:
Benefits and other changes in policy reserves		—			—			860			—			860
Interest credited		—			—			177			—			177
Acquisition and operating expenses, net of deferrals		88			35			271			—			394
Amortization of deferred acquisition costs and intangibles		—			—			99			—			99
Interest expense		1			71			37			(4	)		105

Total benefits and expenses		89			106			1,444			(4	)		1,635

Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes and equity in income of subsidiaries		(90	)		(126	)		366			—			150
Provision (benefit) for income taxes		(24	)		(43	)		90			—			23
Equity in income of subsidiaries		119			106			—			(225	)		—

Income from continuing operations		53			23			276			(225	)		127
Loss from discontinued operations, net of taxes		—			—			(19	)		—			(19	)

Net income		53			23			257			(225	)		108
Less: net income attributable to noncontrolling interests		—			—			55			—			55

Net income available to Genworth Financial, Inc.’s common stockholders	$	53		$	23		$	202		$	(225	)	$	53

GENWORTH FINANCIAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

The following table presents the condensed consolidating income statement information for the three months ended March 31, 2015:


(Amounts in millions)	Parent Guarantor			Issuer			All Other Subsidiaries			Eliminations			Consolidated
Revenues:
Premiums	$	—		$	—		$	1,143		$	—		$	1,143
Net investment income		—			—			785			(4	)		781
Net investment gains (losses)		—			3			(19	)		—			(16	)
Policy fees and other income		—			(9	)		236			—			227

Total revenues		—			(6	)		2,145			(4	)		2,135

Benefits and expenses:
Benefits and other changes in policy reserves		—			—			1,192			—			1,192
Interest credited		—			—			180			—			180
Acquisition and operating expenses, net of deferrals		5			1			261			—			267
Amortization of deferred acquisition costs and intangibles		—			—			95			—			95
Interest expense		—			77			34			(4	)		107

Total benefits and expenses		5			78			1,762			(4	)		1,841

Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes and equity in income of subsidiaries		(5	)		(84	)		383			—			294
Provision (benefit) for income taxes		(9	)		(29	)		129			—			91
Equity in income of subsidiaries		150			143			—			(293	)		—

Income from continuing operations		154			88			254			(293	)		203
Income from discontinued operations, net of taxes		—			—			1			—			1

Net income		154			88			255			(293	)		204
Less: net income attributable to noncontrolling interests		—			—			50			—			50

Net income available to Genworth Financial, Inc.’s common stockholders	$	154		$	88		$	205		$	(293	)	$	154

GENWORTH FINANCIAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

The following table presents the condensed consolidating comprehensive income statement information for the three months ended March 31, 2016:


(Amounts in millions)	Parent Guarantor			Issuer			All Other Subsidiaries			Eliminations			Consolidated
Net income	$	53		$	23		$	257		$	(225	)	$	108
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of taxes:
Net unrealized gains (losses) on securities not other-than-temporarily impaired		807			789			809			(1,598	)		807
Net unrealized gains (losses) on other-than-temporarily impaired securities		(4	)		(5	)		(4	)		9			(4	)
Derivatives qualifying as hedges		257			256			275			(531	)		257
Foreign currency translation and other adjustments		115			86			217			(202	)		216

Total other comprehensive income (loss)		1,175			1,126			1,297			(2,322	)		1,276

Total comprehensive income (loss)		1,228			1,149			1,554			(2,547	)		1,384
Less: comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests		—			—			156			—			156

Total comprehensive income (loss) available to Genworth Financial, Inc.’s common stockholders	$	1,228		$	1,149		$	1,398		$	(2,547	)	$	1,228

The following table presents the condensed consolidating comprehensive income statement information for the three months ended March 31, 2015:


(Amounts in millions)	Parent Guarantor			Issuer			All Other Subsidiaries			Eliminations			Consolidated
Net income	$	154		$	88		$	255		$	(293	)	$	204
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of taxes:
Net unrealized gains (losses) on securities not other-than-temporarily impaired		293			275			323			(568	)		323
Net unrealized gains (losses) on other-than-temporarily impaired securities		2			2			2			(4	)		2
Derivatives qualifying as hedges		177			177			189			(366	)		177
Foreign currency translation and other adjustments		(226	)		(170	)		(370	)		396			(370	)

Total other comprehensive income (loss)		246			284			144			(542	)		132

Total comprehensive income (loss)		400			372			399			(835	)		336
Less: comprehensive income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests		—			—			(64	)		—			(64	)

Total comprehensive income (loss) available to Genworth Financial, Inc.’s common stockholders	$	400		$	372		$	463		$	(835	)	$	400

GENWORTH FINANCIAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

The following table presents the condensed consolidating cash flow statement information for the three months ended March 31, 2016:


(Amounts in millions)	Parent Guarantor			Issuer			All Other Subsidiaries			Eliminations			Consolidated
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income	$	53		$	23		$	257		$	(225	)	$	108
Less loss from discontinued operations, net of taxes		—			—			19			—			19
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash from operating activities:
Equity in income from subsidiaries		(119	)		(106	)		—			225			—
Dividends from subsidiaries		—			73			(73	)		—			—
Gain on sale of subsidiary		—			—			(20	)		—			(20	)
Amortization of fixed maturity securities discounts and premiums and limited partnerships		—			—			(38	)		—			(38	)
Net investment losses (gains)		—			15			4			—			19
Charges assessed to policyholders		—			—			(191	)		—			(191	)
Acquisition costs deferred		—			—			(50	)		—			(50	)
Amortization of deferred acquisition costs and intangibles		—			—			99			—			99
Deferred income taxes		(5	)		(48	)		60			—			7
Net increase (decrease) in trading securities, held-for-sale investments and derivative instruments		—			3			18			—			21
Stock-based compensation expense		5			—			2			—			7
Change in certain assets and liabilities:
Accrued investment income and other assets		4			(45	)		(113	)		(5	)		(159	)
Insurance reserves		—			—			36			—			36
Current tax liabilities		(7	)		(6	)		5			—			(8	)
Other liabilities, policy and contract claims and other policy-related balances		3			(65	)		469			(1	)		406

Net cash from operating activities		(66	)		(156	)		484			(6	)		256

Cash flows from investing activities:
Proceeds from maturities and repayments of investments:
Fixed maturity securities		—			150			690			—			840
Commercial mortgage loans		—			—			192			—			192
Restricted commercial mortgage loans related to securitization entities		—			—			6			—			6
Proceeds from sales of investments:
Fixed maturity and equity securities		—			—			905			—			905
Purchases and originations of investments:
Fixed maturity and equity securities		—			—			(2,042	)		—			(2,042	)
Commercial mortgage loans		—			—			(200	)		—			(200	)
Other invested assets, net		—			100			(72	)		6			34
Policy loans, net		—			—			10			—			10
Intercompany notes receivable		—			(66	)		66			—			—

Net cash from investing activities		—			184			(445	)		6			(255	)

Cash flows from financing activities:
Deposits to universal life and investment contracts		—			—			571			—			571
Withdrawals from universal life and investment contracts		—			—			(517	)		—			(517	)
Redemption of non-recourse funding obligations		—			—			(1,620	)		—			(1,620	)
Repayment and repurchase of long-term debt		—			(326	)		—			—			(326	)
Repayment of borrowings related to securitization entities		—			—			(10	)		—			(10	)
Dividends paid to noncontrolling interests		—			—			(52	)		—			(52	)
Proceeds from intercompany notes payable		66			(66	)		—			—			—
Other, net		—			—			13			—			13

Net cash from financing activities		66			(392	)		(1,615	)		—			(1,941	)

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents		—			—			31			—			31

Net change in cash and cash equivalents		—			(364	)		(1,545	)		—			(1,909	)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		—			1,124			4,869			—			5,993

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period		—			760			3,324			—			4,084
Less cash and cash equivalents held for sale at end of period		—			—			41			—			41

Cash and cash equivalents of continuing operations at end of period	$	—		$	760		$	3,283		$	—		$	4,043

GENWORTH FINANCIAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

The following table presents the condensed consolidating cash flow statement information for the three months ended March 31, 2015:


(Amounts in millions)	Parent Guarantor			Issuer			All Other Subsidiaries			Eliminations			Consolidated
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income	$	154		$	88		$	255		$	(293	)	$	204
Less income from discontinued operations, net of taxes		—			—			(1	)		—			(1	)
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash from operating activities:
Equity in income from subsidiaries		(150	)		(143	)		—			293			—
Dividends from subsidiaries		—			132			(132	)		—			—
Amortization of fixed maturity securities discounts and premiums and limited partnerships		—			—			(21	)		—			(21	)
Net investment losses (gains)		—			(3	)		19			—			16
Charges assessed to policyholders		—			—			(196	)		—			(196	)
Acquisition costs deferred		—			—			(86	)		—			(86	)
Amortization of deferred acquisition costs and intangibles		—			—			95			—			95
Deferred income taxes		(5	)		(40	)		70			—			25
Net increase (decrease) in trading securities, held-for-sale investments and derivative instruments		—			9			9			—			18
Stock-based compensation expense		2			—			(5	)		—			(3	)
Change in certain assets and liabilities:
Accrued investment income and other assets		2			(7	)		(23	)		3			(25	)
Insurance reserves		—			—			443			—			443
Current tax liabilities		(4	)		66			(71	)		—			(9	)
Other liabilities, policy and contract claims and other policy-related balances		—			(60	)		275			(13	)		202
Cash from operating activities—held for sale		—			—			(38	)		—			(38	)

Net cash from operating activities		(1	)		42			593			(10	)		624

Cash flows from investing activities:
Proceeds from maturities and repayments of investments:
Fixed maturity securities		—			—			1,089			—			1,089
Commercial mortgage loans		—			—			198			—			198
Restricted commercial mortgage loans related to securitization entities		—			—			13			—			13
Proceeds from sales of investments:
Fixed maturity and equity securities		—			—			418			—			418
Purchases and originations of investments:
Fixed maturity and equity securities		—			—			(1,802	)		—			(1,802	)
Commercial mortgage loans		—			—			(247	)		—			(247	)
Other invested assets, net		—			(100	)		1			10			(89	)
Intercompany notes receivable		2			(10	)		38			(30	)		—
Capital contributions to subsidiaries		—			(25	)		25			—			—
Cash from investing activities—held for sale		—			—			54			—			54

Net cash from investing activities		2			(135	)		(213	)		(20	)		(366	)

Cash flows from financing activities:
Deposits to universal life and investment contracts		—			—			630			—			630
Withdrawals from universal life and investment contracts		—			—			(527	)		—			(527	)
Redemption of non-recourse funding obligations		—			—			(13	)		—			(13	)
Repayment of borrowings related to securitization entities		—			—			(11	)		—			(11	)
Dividends paid to noncontrolling interests		—			—			(54	)		—			(54	)
Proceeds from intercompany notes payable		—			(40	)		10			30			—
Other, net		(1	)		—			38			—			37
Cash from financing activities—held for sale		—			—			(27	)		—			(27	)

Net cash from financing activities		(1	)		(40	)		46			30			35

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents		—			—			(53	)		—			(53	)

Net change in cash and cash equivalents		—			(133	)		373			—			240
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		—			953			3,965			—			4,918

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period		—			820			4,338			—			5,158
Less cash and cash equivalents held for sale at end of period		—			—			221			—			221

Cash and cash equivalents from continuing operations at end of period	$	—		$	820		$	4,117		$	—		$	4,937

GENWORTH FINANCIAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

Our insurance company subsidiaries are restricted by state and foreign laws and regulations as to the amount of dividends they may pay to their parent without regulatory approval in any year, the purpose of which is to protect affected insurance policyholders and contractholders, not stockholders. Any dividends in excess of limits are deemed “extraordinary” and require approval. Based on estimated statutory results as of December 31, 2015, in accordance with applicable dividend restrictions, our subsidiaries could pay dividends of approximately $140 million to us in 2016 without obtaining regulatory approval, and the remaining net assets are considered restricted. While the $140 million is unrestricted, we do not expect our insurance subsidiaries to pay dividends to us in 2016 at this level if they need to retain capital for growth and to meet capital requirements and desired thresholds. As of March 31, 2016, Genworth Financial’s and Genworth Holdings’ subsidiaries had restricted net assets of $14.0 billion and $14.1 billion, respectively.

Item 2.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and related notes included herein and with our 2015 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Cautionary note regarding forward-looking statements

This report contains certain “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements may be identified by words such as “expects,” “intends,” “anticipates,” “plans,” “believes,” “seeks,” “estimates,” “will” or words of similar meaning and include, but are not limited to, statements regarding the outlook for our future business and financial performance. Forward-looking statements are based on management’s current expectations and assumptions, which are subject to inherent uncertainties, risks and changes in circumstances that are difficult to predict. Actual outcomes and results may differ materially due to global political, economic, business, competitive, market, regulatory and other factors and risks, including, but not limited to, the following:

•

strategic risks including: our inability to successfully execute strategic plans to effectively address our current business challenges (including with respect to the restructuring of our U.S. life insurance businesses, cost savings, ratings and capital), our inability to complete the planned sale of our European mortgage insurance business at all or on the terms anticipated, and failure to attract buyers for any other businesses or other assets we may seek to sell, or securities we may seek to issue, in each case, in a timely manner on anticipated terms; failure to obtain any required regulatory, stockholder and/or noteholder approvals or consents, or our challenges changing or being more costly or difficult to successfully address than currently anticipated or the benefits achieved being less than anticipated; inability to achieve anticipated cost-savings in a timely manner; or adverse tax or accounting charges; and inability to increase the capital needed in our businesses in a timely manner and on anticipated terms, including through improved business performance, reinsurance or similar transactions, asset sales, securities offerings or otherwise, in each case as and when required;

•

risks relating to estimates, assumptions and valuations including: inadequate reserves and the need to increase reserves (including as a result of any changes we may make to our assumptions, methodologies or otherwise in connection with periodic or other reviews); inaccurate models; deviations from our estimates and actuarial assumptions or other reasons in our long-term care insurance, life insurance and/or annuity businesses; accelerated amortization of deferred acquisition costs (“DAC”) and present value of future profits (“PVFP”) (including as a result of any changes we may make to our assumptions, methodologies or otherwise in connection with periodic or other reviews); adverse impact on our financial results as a result of projected profits followed by projected losses (as is currently the case with our long-term care insurance business); and changes in valuation of fixed maturity, equity and trading securities;

•

risks relating to economic, market and political conditions including: downturns and volatility in global economies and equity and credit markets; interest rates and changes in rates; deterioration in economic conditions or a decline in home prices that adversely affect our loss experience in mortgage insurance; political and economic instability or changes in government policies; and fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates and international securities markets;

•

regulatory and legal risks including: extensive regulation of our businesses and changes in applicable laws and regulations; litigation and regulatory investigations or other actions, including not receiving court approval of the planned settlement of In re Genworth Financial, Inc. Securities Litigation; dependence on dividends and other distributions from our subsidiaries (particularly our international subsidiaries) and the inability of any subsidiaries to pay dividends or make other distributions to us, including as a result of the performance of our subsidiaries and insurance, regulatory or corporate law restrictions (including the unwillingness or inability of the subsidiary that indirectly owns most of the interests in our Australian and Canadian mortgage insurance businesses to pay the dividends that it

receives from those businesses as a result of the impact on its financial condition of its capital support for certain long-term care insurance related reinsurance arrangements); adverse change in regulatory requirements, including risk-based capital; changes in regulations adversely affecting our international operations; inability to meet or maintain the private mortgage insurer eligibility requirements (“PMIERs”); inability of our U.S. mortgage insurance subsidiaries to meet minimum statutory capital requirements and hazardous financial condition standards; the influence of Federal National Mortgage Association (“Fannie Mae”), Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (“Freddie Mac”) and a small number of large mortgage lenders on the U.S. mortgage insurance market and adverse changes to the role or structure of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac; adverse changes in regulations affecting our mortgage insurance businesses; inability to continue to implement actions to mitigate the impact of statutory reserve requirements; impact of additional regulations pursuant to the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the “Dodd-Frank Act”); and changes in accounting and reporting standards;

•

liquidity, financial strength ratings, credit and counterparty risks including: insufficient internal sources to meet liquidity needs and limited or no access to capital (including our inability to replace our credit facility); recent or future adverse rating agency actions, including with respect to rating downgrades or potential downgrades, or being put on review for potential downgrade, all of which could have adverse implications for us, including with respect to key business relationships, product offerings, business results of operations, financial condition and capital needs, strategic plans, collateral obligations and availability and terms of hedging, reinsurance and borrowings; defaults by counterparties to reinsurance arrangements or derivative instruments; defaults or other events impacting the value of our fixed maturity securities portfolio; and defaults on our commercial mortgage loans or the mortgage loans underlying our investments in commercial mortgage-backed securities and volatility in performance;

•

operational risks including: inability to retain, attract and motivate qualified employees or senior management; ineffective or inadequate risk management in identifying, controlling or mitigating risks; reliance on, and loss of, key customer or distribution relationships; availability, affordability and adequacy of reinsurance to protect us against losses; competition; competition in our mortgage insurance businesses from government and government-owned and government-sponsored enterprises (“GSEs”) offering mortgage insurance; material weakness in, or ineffective, internal control over financial reporting; and failure or any compromise of the security of our computer systems, disaster recovery systems and business continuity plans and failures to safeguard, or breaches of, our confidential information;

•

insurance and product-related risks including: our inability to increase sufficiently, and in a timely manner, premiums on in-force long-term care insurance policies and/or reduce in-force benefits, and charge higher premiums on new policies, in each case, as currently anticipated and as may be required from time to time in the future (including as a result of our failure to obtain any necessary regulatory approvals or unwillingness or inability of policyholders to pay increased premiums); our inability to reflect future premium increases and other management actions in our margin calculation as anticipated; failure to sufficiently increase new sales for our long-term care insurance products; inability to realize anticipated benefits of our rescissions, curtailments, loan modifications or other similar programs in our mortgage insurance businesses; premiums for the significant portion of our mortgage insurance risk in-force with high loan-to-value ratios may not be sufficient to compensate us for the greater risks associated with those policies; decreases in the volume of high loan-to-value mortgage originations or increases in mortgage insurance cancellations; increases in the use of alternatives to private mortgage insurance and reductions in the level of coverage selected; potential liabilities in connection with our U.S. contract underwriting services; and medical advances, such as genetic research and diagnostic imaging, and related legislation that impact policyholder behavior in ways adverse to us;

•

other risks including: occurrence of natural or man-made disasters or a pandemic; impairments of or valuation allowances against our deferred tax assets; the possibility that in certain circumstances we

will be obligated to make payments to General Electric Company (“GE”) under the tax matters agreement with GE even if our corresponding tax savings are never realized and payments could be accelerated in the event of certain changes in control; and provisions of our certificate of incorporation and bylaws and the tax matters agreement with GE may discourage takeover attempts and business combinations that stockholders might consider in their best interests; and

•

risks relating to our common stock including: the continued suspension of payment of dividends; and stock price fluctuations.

We undertake no obligation to publicly update any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future developments or otherwise.

Overview

Our business

We are dedicated to helping meet the homeownership and long-term care needs of our customers. We have the following five operating business segments:

•

U.S. Life Insurance. We offer long-term care insurance products as well as service traditional life insurance and fixed annuity products in the United States.

•

Runoff. The Runoff segment includes the results of non-strategic products which are no longer actively sold. Our non-strategic products primarily include our variable annuity, variable life insurance, institutional, corporate-owned life insurance and other accident and health insurance products. Institutional products consist of: funding agreements, funding agreements backing notes (“FABNs”) and guaranteed investment contracts (“GICs”). We no longer offer retail and group variable annuities but continue to service our existing blocks of business.

In addition to our five operating business segments, we also have Corporate and Other activities which include debt financing expenses that are incurred at the Genworth Holdings, Inc. (“Genworth Holdings”) level, unallocated corporate income and expenses, eliminations of inter-segment transactions and the results of other businesses that are managed outside of our operating segments, including certain smaller international mortgage insurance businesses and discontinued operations.

held-for-sale criteria were satisfied during the fourth quarter of 2015, our European mortgage insurance business, included in Corporate and Other activities, has been reported as held for sale and its financial position is separately reported for all periods presented. All prior periods reflected herein have been re-presented on this basis. See note 12 in our consolidated financial statements under “Item 1—Financial Statements” for additional information.

Strategic Update

Our focus remains on improving business performance and increasing financial and strategic flexibility across the organization. Our strategy includes maximizing our opportunities in our mortgage insurance businesses and restructuring our U.S. life insurance businesses.

On February 4, 2016, as part of restructuring our U.S. life insurance businesses, we announced an initiative to: (i) suspend sales of our traditional life insurance and fixed annuity products; (ii) further reduce expense levels in 2016; (iii) repatriate existing business from Brookfield Life and Annuity Insurance Company Limited (“BLAIC”), our primary Bermuda domiciled reinsurance subsidiary, to our U.S. life insurance subsidiaries in 2016; and (iv) separate and potentially isolate our long-term care insurance business.

In the first quarter of 2016, we made progress on this plan. All sales of traditional life insurance and fixed annuity products were suspended on March 7, 2016. Expense actions taken to date are expected to reduce cash expenses by approximately $135 million pre-tax on an annualized basis. Effective April 1, 2016, we recaptured a block of universal life insurance from BLAIC to the U.S. life insurance companies. In March 2016, we successfully completed a bond consent solicitation, demonstrating progress toward the isolation of our long-term care insurance business. The bond consents permitted us to amend our bond indentures to: (i) eliminate concerns that any bankruptcy or insolvency-related events involving the subsidiary companies that operate our long-term care insurance business would result in a default of our bonds; and (ii) provide clarity on how Genworth Holdings’ debt would be treated in a sale or disposition of our life insurance, annuity and long-term care insurance businesses, eliminating uncertainty related to certain potential transactions.

In conjunction with this U.S. life insurance restructuring plan, we continue to remain open to strategic alternatives and are actively pursuing options that would accomplish the goal of separating and isolating the long-term care business from our other businesses and ultimately separating the mortgage insurance businesses from the U.S. life insurance businesses. The successful completion of the bond consent process, our efforts to reduce our holding company debt and our continuing progress in executing the U.S. life insurance restructuring plan to simplify our organization and reduce interdependencies are expected to provide additional strategic and financial flexibility. In assessing strategic options, we are considering many factors, including, the level of debt capacity, tax considerations, the views of regulators and rating agencies, and resulting impacts to book value, liquidity and other financial metrics.

Executive Summary of Financial Results

Below is an executive summary of our consolidated financial results for the periods indicated. Amounts below are net of taxes, unless otherwise indicated.

Three Months Ended March 31, 2016 Compared to Three Months Ended March 31, 2015

•

We had net income available to Genworth Financial, Inc.’s common stockholders of $53 million and $154 million during the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

•

During the three months ended March 31, 2016, we recorded a $45 million expense related to the planned settlement of In re Genworth Financial, Inc. Securities Litigation and an additional $6 million of legal fees and expenses related to this litigation. We also recorded $3 million of additional legal fees in the current year related to other pending litigation.

•

We paid a make-whole expense of approximately $13 million in January 2016 related to the early redemption of Genworth Holdings’ senior notes due in 2016. We repurchased $28 million principal amount of Genworth Holdings’ notes with various maturity dates for a gain of $2 million in the first quarter of 2016.

•

In the first quarter of 2016, we incurred expenses related to Genworth Holdings’ bond consent solicitation of $12 million for broker, advisor and investment banking fees.

•

During the three months ended March 31, 2016, we recorded $9 million related to restructuring costs as part of an expense reduction plan as we evaluate and appropriately size our organizational needs and expenses. In addition, we recorded a loss of $6 million from the write-off of deferred borrowing costs in connection with the early extinguishment of non-recourse funding obligations as part of a life block transaction completed in the first quarter of 2016.

•

Our financial results in our Australia mortgage insurance business were also lower as a result of the additional sale of shares of this business in May 2015, which reduced our ownership percentage to 52.0%.

•

We had an increase of $52 million in our long-term care insurance business in the current year driven by increased premiums and reduced benefits from in-force rate actions, partially offset by a $4 million unfavorable correction related to the calculation on our in-force rate actions.

•

During the three months ended March 31, 2016, we recorded an additional loss of $19 million related to the sale of our lifestyle protection insurance business and an estimated gain of $20 million related to the planned sale of our mortgage insurance business in Europe.

Significant Developments

The periods under review include, among others, the following significant developments.

Dispositions

•

Completed sale of a life insurance block. In January 2016, Genworth Life and Annuity Insurance Company (“GLAIC”), our indirect wholly-owned subsidiary, entered into a reinsurance agreement to coinsure certain term life insurance business with Protective Life Insurance Company (“Protective Life”) as part of a life block transaction. This transaction is expected to generate capital in excess of $150 million in aggregate to Genworth, including anticipated tax benefits of approximately $175 million to the holding company that are scheduled to be settled in July 2016, which are committed to be used in executing the restructuring plan for our U.S. life insurance businesses.

U.S. Life Insurance

•

Rate actions in our long-term care insurance business. As part of our strategy for our long-term care insurance business, we have been implementing, and expect to continue to pursue, significant premium rate increases on the older generation blocks of business that were written before 2002. We are also requesting premium rate increases on newer blocks of business, as needed. For all of these rate action filings, we received 21 filing approvals from six states in the first quarter of 2016, representing a weighted-average increase of 30% on approximately $144 million in annualized in-force premiums. We also submitted 19 new filings in 10 states in the first quarter of 2016 on approximately $206 million in annualized in-force premiums.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

•

Redemption of Genworth Holdings’ 2016 notes. In January 2016, Genworth Holdings redeemed $298 million of its 8.625% senior notes due 2016 issued in December 2009 (the “2016 Notes”) and

paid a make-whole premium of approximately $20 million pre-tax in addition to accrued and unpaid interest using cash proceeds received from the sale of our lifestyle protection insurance business.

•

Repurchase of Genworth Holdings senior notes. During the three months ended March 31, 2016, we repurchased $28 million principal amount of Genworth Holdings’ notes with various maturity dates for a pre-tax gain of $4 million and paid accrued and unpaid interest thereon.

•

Completion of Genworth Holdings’ bond consent solicitation. Genworth Holdings paid total fees related to the bond consent solicitation of approximately $61 million, including bond consent fees of $43 million, which were deferred, as well as broker, advisor and investment banking fees of $18 million, which were expensed, in the first quarter of 2016.

•

Redemption of Non-Recourse Funding Obligations. During the three months ended March 31, 2016, in connection with a life block transaction, River Lake Insurance Company (“River Lake”), our indirect wholly-owned subsidiary, redeemed $975 million of its total outstanding floating rate subordinated notes due in 2033 and River Lake Insurance Company II (“River Lake II”), our indirect wholly-owned subsidiary, redeemed $645 million of its total outstanding floating rate subordinated notes due in 2035 for a pre-tax loss of $9 million from the write-off of deferred borrowing costs.

Financial Strength Ratings

There were no changes of the financial strength ratings of our insurance subsidiaries during the three months ended March 31, 2016 other than the downgrades previously disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on February 26, 2016.

Critical Accounting Estimates

As of March 31, 2016, other than as set forth below, there have been no material changes to critical accounting estimates set forth in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on February 26, 2016.

Deferred acquisition costs

Historically low interest rates spreads have impacted the margins on our fixed immediate annuity products. As of March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, we had margin of approximately $11 million and $19 million, respectively, on $5,758 million and $5,849 million, respectively, of net U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“U.S. GAAP”) liability related to our fixed immediate annuity products. As of March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, we had DAC of $16 million and $17 million, respectively, related to our immediate annuity products. The risks we face include adverse variations in interest rates, credit spreads and/or mortality. Adverse experience in one or both of these risks could result in the DAC associated with our fixed immediate annuity products being no longer fully recoverable as well as the establishment of additional benefit reserves. As of March 31, 2016, for our fixed immediate annuity products, a combined 50 basis point reduction in interest rates or credit spreads, or 2% lower mortality, scenarios that we consider to be reasonably possible given historical changes in market conditions and experience on these products, would result in margin reduction of approximately $27 million or $23 million, respectively. In addition, if interest rates and credit spreads remain at current levels for an extended period of time, margins could decline further or become negative. Margin reduction below zero results in a premium deficiency and would result in a charge to current period earnings. Any favorable variation would result in additional margin in our DAC loss recognition analysis and would result in higher income recognition over the remaining duration of the in-force block. As of March 31, 2016, we believe all of our businesses have sufficient projected future income where the related DAC would be recoverable under selected adverse variations in our assumptions.

Consolidated

General Trends and Conditions

The stability of both the financial markets and global economies in which we operate impacts the sales, revenue growth and profitability trends of our businesses as well as value of assets and liabilities. During 2015 and into 2016, the U.S. and several international financial markets have been impacted by concerns regarding global economies and the rate and strength of recovery, particularly given recent political and geographical events in Europe and the Middle East and slow growth in China, which has kept interest rates low and resulted in decreases in oil and commodity prices.

Slow or varied levels of economic growth, coupled with uncertain financial markets and economic outlooks, changes in government policy, regulatory reforms and other changes in market conditions, influenced, and we believe will continue to influence, investment and spending decisions by consumers and businesses as they adjust their consumption, debt, capital and risk profiles in response to these conditions. These trends change as investor confidence in the markets and the outlook for some consumers and businesses shift. As a result, our sales, revenues and profitability trends of certain insurance and investment products as well as the value of assets and liabilities have been and could be further impacted going forward. In particular, factors such as government spending, monetary policies, the volatility and strength of the capital markets, anticipated tax policy changes and the impact of global financial regulation reform will continue to affect economic and business outlooks, level of interest rates and consumer behaviors moving forward.

The U.S. and international governments, the Federal Reserve, other central banks and other legislative and regulatory bodies have taken certain actions to support the economy and capital markets, influence interest rates, influence housing markets and mortgage servicing and provide liquidity to promote economic growth. These include various mortgage restructuring programs implemented or under consideration by the GSEs, lenders, servicers and the U.S. government. Outside of the United States, various governments and central banks have taken actions to stimulate economies, stabilize financial systems and improve market liquidity. In aggregate, these actions had a positive effect in the short term on the economies of these countries and their markets; however, there can be no assurance as to the future impact these types of actions may have on the economic and financial markets, including levels of interest rates and volatility. A delayed economic recovery period, a U.S. or global recession or regional or global financial crisis could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Consolidated Results of Operations

The following is a discussion of our consolidated results of operations. For a discussion of our segment results, see “—Results of Operations and Selected Financial and Operating Performance Measures by Segment.”

Three Months Ended March 31, 2016 Compared to Three Months Ended March 31, 2015

The following table sets forth the consolidated results of operations for the periods indicated:


	Three months endedMarch 31,						Increase (decrease) and percentage change
(Amounts in millions)	2016			2015			2016 vs. 2015
Revenues:
Premiums	$	794		$	1,143		$	(349	)	(31	)%
Net investment income		789			781			8		1	%
Net investment gains (losses)		(19	)		(16	)		(3	)	(19	)%
Policy fees and other income		221			227			(6	)	(3	)%

Total revenues		1,785			2,135			(350	)	(16	)%

Benefits and expenses:
Benefits and other changes in policy reserves		860			1,192			(332	)	(28	)%
Interest credited		177			180			(3	)	(2	)%
Acquisition and operating expenses, net of deferrals		394			267			127		48	%
Amortization of deferred acquisition costs and intangibles		99			95			4		4	%
Interest expense		105			107			(2	)	(2	)%

Total benefits and expenses		1,635			1,841			(206	)	(11	)%

Income from continuing operations before income taxes		150			294			(144	)	(49	)%
Provision for income taxes		23			91			(68	)	(75	)%

Income from continuing operations		127			203			(76	)	(37	)%
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of taxes		(19	)		1			(20	)	NM	⁽¹⁾

Net income		108			204			(96	)	(47	)%
Less: net income attributable to noncontrolling interests		55			50			5		10	%

Net income available to Genworth Financial, Inc.’s common stockholders	$	53		$	154		$	(101	)	(66	)%

⁽¹⁾	We define “NM” as not meaningful for increases or decreases greater than 200%.

Premiums. Premiums consist primarily of premiums earned on insurance products for mortgage, long-term care, life and accident and health insurance, single premium immediate annuities and structured settlements with life contingencies.

•

Our U.S. Life Insurance segment decreased $342 million. Our life insurance business decreased $364 million principally related to higher ceded reinsurance in the current year. We initially ceded $326 million of certain term life insurance premiums under a new reinsurance treaty as part of a life block transaction. Our fixed annuities business decreased $7 million principally from lower sales of our life-contingent products resulting from the suspension of product offerings in the current year. Our long-term care insurance business increased $29 million largely from $31 million of increased premiums in the current year from in-force rate actions approved and implemented.

•

Our Canada Mortgage Insurance segment decreased $8 million driven by a $17 million decrease attributable to changes in foreign exchange rates during the three months ended March 31, 2016. Excluding the effects of foreign exchange, our Canada Mortgage Insurance segment increased primarily from the seasoning of our larger in-force blocks of business in the current year.

•

Our Australia Mortgage Insurance segment decreased $8 million driven by a $10 million decrease attributable to changes in foreign exchange rates during the three months ended March 31, 2016. Excluding the effects of foreign exchange, our Australia Mortgage Insurance segment increased primarily as a result of the refinements to premium recognition factors made in the third quarter of 2015, partially offset by the seasoning of our prior year in-force blocks of business and a decrease in premiums from a lower loan-to-value mix and flow volume in the current year.

•

Our U.S. Mortgage Insurance segment increased $10 million mainly attributable to higher average flow mortgage insurance in-force and the reversal of the accrual for premium refunds related to policy cancellations that was recorded in the third quarter of 2015, partially offset by higher ceded reinsurance premiums in the current year.

Net investment income. Net investment income represents the income earned on our investments. For discussion of the change in net investment income, see the comparison for this line item under “—Investments and Derivative Instruments.”

Net investment gains (losses). Net investment gains (losses) consist primarily of realized gains and losses from the sale or impairment of our investments, unrealized and realized gains and losses from our trading securities and derivative instruments. For discussion of the change in net investment gains (losses), see the comparison for this line item under “—Investments and Derivative Instruments.”

Policy fees and other income. Policy fees and other income consists primarily of fees assessed against policyholder and contractholder account values, surrender charges, cost of insurance assessed on universal and term universal life insurance policies, advisory and administration service fees assessed on investment contractholder account values, broker/dealer commission revenues and other fees.

•

Our Runoff segment decreased $7 million mainly attributable to lower account values in our variable annuity products in the current year.

•

Our U.S. Life Insurance segment decreased $3 million primarily from our life insurance business largely related to lower production and a decrease in our term universal and universal life insurance in-force blocks in the current year.

•

Our Australia Mortgage Insurance segment increased $4 million primarily due to non-functional currency transactions attributable to remeasurement and repayment of intercompany loans in the prior year that did not recur.

Benefits and other changes in policy reserves. Benefits and other changes in policy reserves consist primarily of claim costs incurred related to mortgage insurance products and benefits paid and reserve activity related to current claims and future policy benefits on insurance and investment products for long-term care, life and accident and health insurance, structured settlements and single premium immediate annuities with life contingencies.

•

Our U.S. Life Insurance segment decreased $333 million. Our life insurance business decreased $337 million principally related to higher ceded reinsurance in the current year. We initially ceded $331 million of certain term life insurance reserves under a new reinsurance treaty as part of a life block transaction. Our fixed annuities business decreased $6 million largely attributable to lower sales of our life-contingent products and lower interest credited, partially offset by less favorable mortality in the current year. Our long-term care insurance business increased $10 million principally from aging and growth of the in-force block, lower terminations, higher severity on new claims, a $7 million unfavorable correction related to a calculation on our in-force rate actions and incremental reserves of $4 million recorded in connection with an accrual for profits followed by losses in the current year. These increases were partially offset by reduced benefits of $52 million in the current year related to in-force rate actions approved and implemented. The prior year also included net unfavorable adjustments of $11 million reflecting a refinement to a reserve calculation on our acquired block of business, partially offset primarily by a favorable correction related to reinsurance.

•

Our U.S. Mortgage Insurance segment decreased $12 million primarily driven by a continued decline in new delinquencies primarily in our 2005 through 2008 book years, partially offset by a lower net benefit from cures and aging of existing delinquencies in the current year.

•

Our Runoff segment increased $8 million primarily related to our variable annuity products from an increase in our guaranteed minimum death benefit (“GMDB”) reserves due to less favorable equity market performance and unfavorable mortality in our corporate-owned life insurance products in the current year.

•

Our Australia Mortgage Insurance segment increased $7 million primarily driven by a favorable adjustment of $7 million in the first quarter of 2015 related to the expected recovery of claims paid in prior periods that did not recur. The increase was also attributable to a higher average reserve per delinquency from aging of existing delinquencies primarily in commodity-dependent regions, partially offset by favorable cures in the current year. The three months ended March 31, 2016 included a decrease of $3 million attributable to changes in foreign exchange rates.

Interest credited. Interest credited represents interest credited on behalf of policyholder and contractholder general account balances.

•

Our U.S. Life Insurance segment decreased $6 million primarily related to our fixed annuities business driven by a decrease in average account values and lower crediting rates in the current year.

•

Our Runoff segment increased $3 million largely related to higher loan cash values in our corporate-owned life insurance products in the current year.

Acquisition and operating expenses, net of deferrals. Acquisition and operating expenses, net of deferrals, represent costs and expenses related to the acquisition and ongoing maintenance of insurance and investment contracts, including commissions, policy issuance expenses and other underwriting and general operating costs. These costs and expenses are net of amounts that are capitalized and deferred, which are costs and expenses that are related directly to the successful acquisition of new or renewal insurance policies and investment contracts, such as first-year commissions in excess of ultimate renewal commissions and other policy issuance expenses.

•

Corporate and Other activities increased $123 million mainly driven by $69 million for the planned settlement of In re Genworth Financial, Inc. Securities Litigation and an additional $10 million of legal fees and expenses related to this litigation. In addition, we paid a make-whole expense of $20 million on the early redemption of Genworth Holdings’ 2016 senior notes in January 2016, and paid broker, advisor and investment banking fees of $18 million associated with Genworth Holdings’ bond consent solicitation in March 2016. The increase was also attributable to an additional estimated loss of $7 million recorded in the first quarter of 2016 related to the planned sale of our mortgage insurance business in Europe and $4 million of additional legal fees in the current year related to other pending litigation. We also had higher net expenses after allocations to our operating segments in the current year.

•

Our Canada Mortgage Insurance segment increased $6 million mainly from higher stock-based compensation expense driven by an increase in Genworth MI Canada Inc.’s (“Genworth Canada”) share price in the current year. The three months ended March 31, 2016 also included a decrease of $2 million attributable to changes in foreign exchange rates.

Amortization of deferred acquisition costs and intangibles. Amortization of deferred acquisition costs and intangibles consists primarily of the amortization of acquisition costs that are capitalized, PVFP and capitalized software. Our U.S. Life Insurance segment increased $5 million. Our life insurance business increased $3 million largely related to the write-off of computer software in connection with a restructuring charge in the current year. Our fixed annuities business increased $2 million largely attributable to a less favorable unlocking primarily related to lapses in the current year.

Interest expense. Interest expense represents interest related to our borrowings that are incurred at Genworth Holdings or subsidiaries and our non-recourse funding obligations and interest expense related to the Tax Matters Agreement and certain reinsurance arrangements being accounted for as deposits.

•

Corporate and Other activities decreased $5 million largely driven by the redemption of $298 million of Genworth Holdings’ senior notes in January 2016.

•

Our U.S. Life Insurance segment increased $3 million driven by our life insurance business principally from the write-off of $9 million of deferred borrowing costs associated with our non-recourse funding obligations as part of a life block transaction and from the impact of credit rating downgrades which increased the cost of financing term life insurance reserves, partially offset by lower letter of credit fees in the current year.

Provision for income taxes. The effective tax rate decreased to 15.2% for the three months ended March 31, 2016 from 30.9% for the three months ended March 31, 2015. The decrease in the effective tax rate was primarily attributable to the reversal of a deferred tax valuation allowance related to our mortgage insurance business in Europe in the current year. The decrease was also related to tax benefits related to the planned sale of our mortgage insurance business in Europe in the current year as well as higher state income tax true ups in the prior year. These decreases were partially offset by international tax true ups in the prior year and higher stock-based compensation in the current year. The three months ended March 31, 2016 included a decrease of $6 million attributable to changes in foreign exchange rates.

Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests. Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests represents the portion of income in a subsidiary attributable to third parties. The increase was primarily related to the additional sale of shares of our Australian mortgage insurance business in May 2015, which reduced our ownership percentage to 52.0%. The three months ended March 31, 2016 included a decrease of $8 million attributable to changes in foreign exchange rates.

Reconciliation of net income to net operating income

Net operating income for the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015 was $103 million and $154 million, respectively. We define net operating income (loss) as income (loss) from continuing operations excluding the after-tax effects of income attributable to noncontrolling interests, net investment gains (losses), goodwill impairments, gains (losses) on the sale of businesses, gains (losses) on the early extinguishment of debt, gains (losses) on insurance block transactions, restructuring costs and infrequent or unusual non-operating items. Gains (losses) on insurance block transactions are defined as gains (losses) on the early extinguishment of non-recourse funding obligations, early termination fees for other financing restructuring and/or resulting gains (losses) on reinsurance restructuring for certain blocks of business. We exclude net investment gains (losses) and infrequent or unusual non-operating items because we do not consider them to be related to the operating performance of our segments and Corporate and Other activities. A component of our net investment gains (losses) is the result of impairments, the size and timing of which can vary significantly depending on market credit cycles. In addition, the size and timing of other investment gains (losses) can be subject to our discretion and are influenced by market opportunities, as well as asset-liability matching considerations. Goodwill impairments, gains (losses) on the sale of businesses, gains (losses) on the early extinguishment of debt, gains (losses) on insurance block transactions and restructuring costs are also excluded from net operating income (loss) because, in our opinion, they are not indicative of overall operating trends. Infrequent or unusual non-operating items are also excluded from net operating income (loss) if, in our opinion, they are not indicative of overall operating trends.

business. Management also uses net operating income (loss) as a basis for determining awards and compensation for senior management and to evaluate performance on a basis comparable to that used by analysts. However, the items excluded from net operating income (loss) have occurred in the past and could, and in some cases will, recur in the future. Net operating income (loss) is not a substitute for net income (loss) available to Genworth Financial, Inc.’s common stockholders determined in accordance with U.S. GAAP. In addition, our definition of net operating income (loss) may differ from the definitions used by other companies.

The following table includes a reconciliation of net income available to Genworth Financial, Inc.’s common stockholders to net operating income for the periods indicated:


	Three months ended March 31,
(Amounts in millions)	2016			2015
Net income available to Genworth Financial, Inc.’s common stockholders	$	53		$	154
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests		55			50

Net income		108			204
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of taxes		(19	)		1

Income from continuing operations		127			203
Less: net income attributable to noncontrolling interests		55			50

Income from continuing operations available to Genworth Financial, Inc.’s common stockholders		72			153
Adjustments to income from continuing operations available to Genworth Financial, Inc.’s common stockholders:
Net investment (gains) losses, net		13			1
(Gains) losses on sale of businesses, net		(20	)		—
(Gains) losses on early extinguishment of debt, net		11			—
(Gains) losses from life block transactions, net		6			—
Expenses related to restructuring, net		9			—
Fees associated with bond consent solicitation, net		12			—

Net operating income	$	103		$	154

In the first quarter of 2016, we recorded an estimated gain of $20 million, net of taxes, related to the planned sale of our mortgage insurance business in Europe.

In the first quarter of 2016, we completed a life block transaction resulting in an after-tax loss of $6 million in connection the early extinguishment of non-recourse funding obligations.

Earnings per share

The following table provides basic and diluted net income available to Genworth Financial, Inc.’s common stockholders and net operating income per common share for the periods indicated:


	Three months ended March 31,
(Amounts in millions, except per share amounts)	2016		2015
Income from continuing operations available to Genworth Financial, Inc.’scommon stockholders per common share:
Basic	$	0.14	$	0.31

Diluted	$	0.14	$	0.31

Net income available to Genworth Financial, Inc.’s common stockholdersper common share:
Basic	$	0.11	$	0.31

Diluted	$	0.11	$	0.31

Net operating income per common share:
Basic	$	0.21	$	0.31

Diluted	$	0.21	$	0.31

Weighted-average common shares outstanding:
Basic		498.0		497.0

Diluted		499.4		498.9

Diluted weighted-average common shares outstanding reflect the effects of potentially dilutive securities including stock options, restricted stock units and other equity-based compensation.

Results of Operations and Selected Financial and Operating Performance Measures by Segment

Our chief operating decision maker evaluates segment performance and allocates resources on the basis of net operating income (loss). See note 9 in our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements under “Item 1—Financial Statements” for a reconciliation of net operating income of our segments and Corporate and Other activities to net income available to Genworth Financial, Inc.’s common stockholders.

Management’s discussion and analysis by segment contains selected operating performance measures including “sales” and “insurance in-force” or “risk in-force” which are commonly used in the insurance industry as measures of operating performance.

Management regularly monitors and reports sales metrics as a measure of volume of new and renewal business generated in a period. Sales refer to: (1) new insurance written for mortgage insurance; (2) annualized first-year premiums for long-term care and term life insurance products; (3) annualized first-year deposits plus

5% of excess deposits for universal and term universal life insurance products; (4) 10% of premium deposits for linked-benefits products; and (5) new and additional premiums/deposits for fixed annuities. Sales do not include renewal premiums on policies or contracts written during prior periods. We consider new insurance written, annualized first-year premiums/deposits, premium equivalents and new premiums/deposits to be a measure of our operating performance because they represent a measure of new sales of insurance policies or contracts during a specified period, rather than a measure of our revenues or profitability during that period.

Management regularly monitors and reports insurance in-force and risk in-force. Insurance in-force for our mortgage and life insurance businesses is a measure of the aggregate face value of outstanding insurance policies as of the respective reporting date. For risk in-force in our mortgage insurance businesses, we have computed an “effective” risk in-force amount, which recognizes that the loss on any particular loan will be reduced by the net proceeds received upon sale of the property. Risk in-force for our U.S. mortgage insurance business is our obligation that is limited under contractual terms to the amounts less than 100% of the mortgage loan value. Effective risk in-force has been calculated by applying to insurance in-force a factor of 35% that represents our highest expected average per-claim payment for any one underwriting year over the life of our businesses in Canada and Australia. In Australia, we have certain risk share arrangements where we provide pro-rata coverage of certain loans rather than 100% coverage. As a result, for loans with these risk share arrangements, the applicable pro-rata coverage amount provided is used when applying the factor. We consider insurance in-force and risk in-force to be measures of our operating performance because they represent measures of the size of our business at a specific date which will generate revenues and profits in a future period, rather than measures of our revenues or profitability during that period.

Management also regularly monitors and reports a loss ratio for our businesses. For our mortgage insurance businesses, the loss ratio is the ratio of incurred losses and loss adjustment expenses to net earned premiums. For our long-term care insurance business, the loss ratio is the ratio of benefits and other changes in reserves less tabular interest on reserves less loss adjustment expenses to net earned premiums. We consider the loss ratio to be a measure of underwriting performance in these businesses and helps to enhance the understanding of the operating performance of our businesses.

An assumed tax rate of 35% is utilized in certain adjustments to net operating income (loss) and in the explanation of specific variances of operating performance.

These operating performance measures enable us to compare our operating performance across periods without regard to revenues or profitability related to policies or contracts sold in prior periods or from investments or other sources.

U.S. Mortgage Insurance segment

Trends and conditions

Results of our U.S. mortgage insurance business are affected primarily by the following factors: competitor actions; unemployment or underemployment levels; other economic and housing market trends, including interest rates, home prices, and mortgage origination volume mix and practices; the levels and aging of mortgage delinquencies, which may be affected by seasonal variations; the inventory of unsold homes; lender modification and other servicing efforts; and resolution of pending or any future litigation, among other items. The impact of prior years’ weakness and uncertainty in the domestic economy, related levels of unemployment and underemployment and resulting increase in foreclosures, the number of borrowers seeking loan modifications and the level of housing inventories with the related impact on home values, all contributed adversely to the performance of our insured portfolio relating to our 2005 through 2008 book years. Our results are subject to the continued recovery of the U.S. housing market and the extent of the adverse impact of seasonality that we experience historically in the second half of the year.

The level of private mortgage insurance industry market penetration and eventual market size is affected in part by actions taken by the GSEs, the Federal Housing Administration (“FHA”), the Federal Housing Finance

Agency (“FHFA”), the U.S. Congress or the U.S. government which impact housing or housing finance policy. In the past, these actions have included announced changes, or potential changes, to underwriting standards, FHA pricing, GSE guaranty fees and loan limits as well as low-down-payment programs available through the FHA or GSEs.

Mortgage origination volume increased modestly from the fourth quarter of 2015, as higher refinance mortgage loan origination volume offset seasonally-lower purchase mortgage loan origination volume. Mortgage interest rates moved slightly lower during the first quarter of 2016, as higher volatility in the U.S. and international financial markets and a weaker outlook for global economic growth reduced U.S. Treasury yields and residential mortgage-backed securities. The relative increase in refinance mortgages compared to purchase mortgages resulted in a mix of originations with fewer purchase mortgages in the first quarter of 2016 compared to the fourth quarter of 2015. Because purchase mortgages typically are insured with private mortgage insurance more often than refinance mortgages, a mix of overall originations containing fewer purchase money mortgages results in a smaller private mortgage insurance market. Our U.S. mortgage insurance estimated market share remained stable during the first quarter of 2016.

New insurance written in the first quarter of 2016 increased 17% compared to the first quarter of 2015 but decreased 5% compared to the fourth quarter of 2015 consistent with normal seasonal declines in purchase originations. We continue to manage the quality of new business through our underwriting guidelines, which we modify from time to time when circumstances warrant. The percentage of single premium new insurance written increased modestly in the first quarter of 2016 reflecting our selective participation in this market. Future volumes of these products will vary depending in part on our evaluation of their risk return profile of these transactions. We have observed changes in competitor pricing protocols as well as continued highly competitive pricing with monthly premium borrower paid mortgage insurance during the first quarter of 2016. In March 2016, we introduced a new monthly premium borrower paid rate card which aligned our pricing with the factors promulgated by the GSEs in the revised industry-wide risk-based capital requirements under PMIERs. Our updated rate card features reduced rates across all loan-to-value ratios for borrowers with credit scores above 740, is broadly competitive with the industry, including the FHA, and results in a weighted-average rate consistent with our prior rate card given our current mix of business.

Our loss ratio decreased to 24% for the three months ended March 31, 2016 reflecting lower new delinquencies. New delinquencies during the first quarter of 2016 decreased compared to the first quarter of 2015 and the fourth quarter of 2015 due to macroeconomic improvements including improvements in unemployment rates and in housing values. The majority of new delinquencies in the first quarter of 2016 continued to come from our 2005 through 2008 book years. We have observed improvement in the ultimate claim expectations from early stage delinquencies through the first quarter of 2016. Foreclosure starts and the number of paid claims decreased during the first quarter of 2016 as compared to the first quarter of 2015. In addition, the older delinquencies that remain in our portfolio, particularly those from our 2005 through 2008 book years, continued to age through the first quarter of 2016 from the lengthening of the foreclosure process. This aging has resulted in increased claims expenses relative to claims paid during the period prior to the 2008 financial crisis when the industry was experiencing a shorter foreclosure process than at present. Overall, we have seen a reduction in loans that have been subject to a modification or workout in the first quarter of 2016 compared to the first quarter of 2015. We expect our level of loan modifications to continue to decline going forward in line with the expected reduction in delinquent loans and the continuing aging of delinquencies. Depending on our experience going forward, we may need to adjust our reserve frequency or severity assumptions as experience from these programs continues to emerge.

As of March 31, 2016, GMICO’s risk-to-capital ratio under the current regulatory framework as established under North Carolina law and enforced by the North Carolina Department of Insurance (“NCDOI”), GMICO’s domestic insurance regulator, was approximately 15.5:1, compared with a risk-to-capital ratio of approximately 16.4:1 as of December 31, 2015. This risk-to-capital ratio remains below the NCDOI’s maximum risk-to-capital ratio of 25:1. GMICO’s ongoing risk-to-capital ratio will depend principally on the magnitude of future losses

incurred by GMICO, the effectiveness of ongoing loss mitigation activities, new business volume and profitability, the amount of policy lapses, the amount of additional capital that is generated within the business or capital support (if any) that we provide and changes in the value of affiliate assets.

Effective December 31, 2015, each GSE adopted revised PMIERs which set forth operational and financial requirements that mortgage insurers must meet in order to remain eligible. Each approved mortgage insurer is required to provide the GSEs with an annual certification and a quarterly report as to its compliance with PMIERs. We have met all PMIERs reporting requirements as required by the GSEs to date. As of March 31, 2016, we estimate our U.S. mortgage insurance business had available assets of approximately 113% of the required assets under PMIERs compared to 109% as of December 31, 2015. This increase was driven primarily by a higher valuation of our U.S mortgage insurance business’ holdings in Genworth Canada, the impact of foreign exchange and the reduction in delinquent loans.

In 2015, our U.S. mortgage insurance business entered into three separate reinsurance transactions for the primary purpose of obtaining capital credit under PMIERs in order to meet the PMIERs financial requirements. Beginning January 1, 2016, the reinsurance treaty covering our 2015 book year includes all eligible mortgage insurance certificates issued through the fourth quarter of 2015. The three reinsurance transactions provided an aggregate of approximately $525 million of PMIERs capital credit as of March 31, 2016.

As of March 31, 2016, loans modified through the Home Affordable Refinance Program (“HARP”) accounted for approximately $16.9 billion of insurance in-force, with $15.8 billion of those loans from our 2005 through 2008 book years. The volume of new HARP modifications continues to decrease as the number of loans that would benefit from a HARP modification decreases. Loans modified through HARP have extended amortization periods and reduced interest rates, which reduce borrower’s monthly payments. Over time, we expect these modified loans to result in extended premium streams and a lower incidence of default. The U.S. government has extended HARP through the year ending December 31, 2016. For financial reporting purposes, we report HARP modified loans as a modification of the coverage on existing insurance in-force rather than new insurance written.

On April 14, 2016, FHFA announced the Principal Reduction Modification program for borrowers whose loans are owned or guaranteed by Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac and who meet specific eligibility criteria. FHFA expects that approximately 33,000 borrowers will be eligible for the program but because actual participation will be dependent upon the effectiveness of loan servicer solicitations and loan modification processes, we are not anticipating a material impact on our results of operations.

Segment results of operations

Three Months Ended March 31, 2016 Compared to Three Months Ended March 31, 2015

The following table sets forth the results of operations relating to our U.S. Mortgage Insurance segment for the periods indicated:


	Three months ended March 31,					Increase (decrease) and percentage change
(Amounts in millions)	2016			2015		2016 vs. 2015
Revenues:
Premiums	$	160		$	150	$	10		7	%
Net investment income		15			19		(4	)	(21	)%
Net investment gains (losses)		(1	)		—		(1	)	NM	⁽¹⁾
Policy fees and other income		1			1		—		—	%

Total revenues		175			170		5		3	%

Benefits and expenses:
Benefits and other changes in policy reserves		38			50		(12	)	(24	)%
Acquisition and operating expenses, net of deferrals		39			37		2		5	%
Amortization of deferred acquisition costs and intangibles		3			2		1		50	%

Total benefits and expenses		80			89		(9	)	(10	)%

Income from continuing operations before income taxes		95			81		14		17	%
Provision for income taxes		34			29		5		17	%

Income from continuing operations available to Genworth Financial, Inc.’s common stockholders		61			52		9		17	%
Adjustment to income from continuing operations available to Genworth Financial, Inc.’s common stockholders:
Net investment (gains) losses, net		—			—		—		—	%

Net operating income	$	61		$	52	$	9		17	%

⁽¹⁾	We define “NM” as not meaningful for increases or decreases greater than 200%.

Net operating income

Net operating income increased in the current year mainly attributable to a continued decline in new delinquencies and higher premiums, partially offset by a lower benefit from net cures and aging of existing delinquencies.

Revenues

Premiums increased mainly attributable to higher average flow mortgage insurance in-force and the reversal of the accrual for premium refunds related to policy cancellations that was recorded in the third quarter of 2015, partially offset by higher ceded reinsurance premiums in the current year.

Net investment income decreased primarily from lower intercompany dividends received of approximately $8 million as a result of the intercompany sale of U.S. mortgage insurance’s ownership interest in affiliate preferred securities in July 2015. This decrease was partially offset by higher average invested assets in the current year.

100

Benefits and expenses

Benefits and other changes in policy reserves decreased due to a continued decline in new delinquencies primarily in our 2005 through 2008 book years, partially offset by a lower net benefit from cures and aging of existing delinquencies in the current year.

Acquisition and operating expenses, net of deferrals, increased primarily from higher employee compensation expense that resulted from growth in sales in the current year. This increase was partially offset by a write-off of software in the prior year that did not recur.

Provision for income taxes. The effective tax rate increased slightly to 35.8% for the three months ended March 31, 2016 from 35.7% for the three months ended March 31, 2015. The increase in the effective tax rate was primarily attributable to changes in state taxes.

U.S. Mortgage Insurance selected operating performance measures

The following table sets forth selected operating performance measures regarding our U.S. Mortgage Insurance segment as of or for the dates indicated:


	As of or for the three months ended March 31,				Increase (decrease) and percentage change
(Amounts in millions)	2016		2015		2016 vs. 2015
Primary insurance in-force	$	124,100	$	115,200	$	8,900	8	%
Risk in-force		31,600		28,900		2,700	9	%
New insurance written		7,400		6,300		1,100	17	%
Net premiums written		176		170		6	4	%

Primary insurance in-force and risk in-force

Primary insurance in-force increased primarily as a result of the increase of $9.8 billion in flow insurance in-force, which increased from $111.9 billion as of March 31, 2015 to $121.7 billion as of March 31, 2016 as a result of new insurance written during the current year. The increase in flow insurance in-force was partially offset by a decline of $0.9 billion in bulk insurance in-force, which decreased from $3.3 billion as of March 31, 2015 to $2.4 billion as of March 31, 2016 from cancellations and lapses. In addition, risk in-force increased primarily as a result of higher flow new insurance written. Flow persistency was 82% and 81% for the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

New insurance written

New insurance written increased in the current year primarily driven by a larger purchase originations market and an increase in our market share. We also had a lower concentration of single premium lender paid business reflecting our decision to selectively participate in the market.

Net premiums written

Net premiums written increased due to higher flow insurance in-force and the reversal of the accrual for premium refunds related to policy cancellations that was recorded in the third quarter of 2015, partially offset by higher ceded reinsurance premiums in the current year.

101

Loss and expense ratios

The following table sets forth the loss and expense ratios for our U.S. Mortgage Insurance segment for the dates indicated:


	Three months ended March 31,						Increase (decrease)
	2016			2015			2016 vs. 2015
Loss ratio		24	%		33	%		(9)	%
Expense ratio (net earned premiums)		26	%		26	%		—	%
Expense ratio (net premiums written)		24	%		23	%		1	%

The loss ratio is the ratio of incurred losses and loss adjustment expenses to net earned premiums. The expense ratio (net earned premiums) is the ratio of general expenses to net earned premiums. The expense ratio (net premiums written) is the ratio of general expenses to net premiums written. In our business, general expenses consist of acquisition and operating expenses, net of deferrals, and amortization of deferred acquisition costs and intangibles.

The loss ratio decreased primarily from a continued decline in new delinquencies primarily in our 2005 through 2008 book years, in addition to higher net earned premiums attributable to higher average flow mortgage insurance in-force and the reversal of the accrual for premium refunds related to policy cancellations that was recorded in the third quarter of 2015, partially offset by higher ceded reinsurance premiums in the current year. These decreases were partially offset by a lower net benefit from cures and aging of existing delinquencies in the current year.

The expense ratio (net premiums written) increased slightly from higher employee compensation expense that resulted from growth in sales, mostly offset by higher net premiums in the current year. The prior year also included a write-off of software that did not recur.

Delinquent loans

The following table sets forth the number of loans insured, the number of delinquent loans and the delinquency rate for our U.S. mortgage insurance portfolio as of the dates indicated:


	March 31, 2016			December 31, 2015			March 31, 2015
Primary insurance:
Insured loans in-force		655,300			651,668			631,591
Delinquent loans		27,602			31,663			35,665
Percentage of delinquent loans (delinquency rate)		4.21	%		4.86	%		5.65	%

Flow loan in-force		632,010			627,349			601,472
Flow delinquent loans		26,491			30,416			34,220
Percentage of flow delinquent loans (delinquency rate)		4.19	%		4.85	%		5.69	%

Bulk loans in-force		23,290			24,319			30,119
Bulk delinquent loans ⁽¹⁾		1,111			1,247			1,445
Percentage of bulk delinquent loans (delinquency rate)		4.77	%		5.13	%		4.80	%

A minus and sub-prime loans in-force		26,995			28,332			33,805
A minus and sub-prime loans delinquent loans		5,546			6,448			7,019
Percentage of A minus and sub-prime delinquent loans (delinquency rate)		20.54	%		22.76	%		20.76	%

Pool insurance:
Insured loans in-force		6,406			6,620			7,979
Delinquent loans		369			386			468
Percentage of delinquent loans (delinquency rate)		5.76	%		5.83	%		5.87	%

⁽¹⁾	Included loans where we were in a secondary loss position for which no reserve was established due to an existing deductible. Excluding these loans, bulk delinquent loans were 776 as of March 31, 2016, 889 as of December 31, 2015 and 984 as of March 31, 2015.

102

Total delinquencies related to our 2005 through 2008 book years have declined as the United States has continued to experience improvement in its residential real estate market.

The following tables set forth flow delinquencies, direct case reserves and risk in-force by aged missed payment status in our U.S. mortgage insurance portfolio as of the dates indicated:


	March 31, 2016
(Dollar amounts in millions)	Delinquencies		Direct casereserves⁽¹⁾		Risk in-force		Reserves as % of risk in-force
Payments in default:
3 payments or less		8,082	$	45	$	337		13	%
4 - 11 payments		7,065		176		294		60	%
12 payments or more		11,344		477		559		85	%

Total		26,491	$	698	$	1,190		59	%

⁽¹⁾	Direct flow case reserves exclude loss adjustment expenses, incurred but not reported and reinsurance reserves.


	December 31, 2015
(Dollar amounts in millions)	Delinquencies		Direct casereserves⁽¹⁾		Risk in-force		Reserves as % of risk in-force
Payments in default:
3 payments or less		10,103	$	52	$	405		13	%
4 - 11 payments		7,366		180		307		59	%
12 payments or more		12,947		543		638		85	%

Total		30,416	$	775	$	1,350		57	%

⁽¹⁾	Direct flow case reserves exclude loss adjustment expenses, incurred but not reported and reinsurance reserves.

Primary insurance delinquency rates differ from region to region in the United States at any one time depending upon economic conditions and cyclical growth patterns. The tables below set forth our primary delinquency rates for the various regions of the United States and the 10 largest states by our risk in-force as of the dates indicated. Delinquency rates are shown by region based upon the location of the underlying property, rather than the location of the lender.


	Percent of primary risk in-force as of March 31, 2016			Percent of totalreserves as ofMarch 31, 2016 ⁽¹⁾			Delinquency rate
	Percent of primary risk in-force as of March 31, 2016			Percent of totalreserves as ofMarch 31, 2016 ⁽¹⁾			March 31, 2016			December 31, 2015			March 31, 2015
By Region:
Southeast ⁽²⁾		19	%		23	^%		5.00	%		5.78	%		6.92	%
South Central ⁽³⁾		16			7			3.35	%		3.81	%		4.03	%
Northeast ⁽⁴⁾		14			34			7.92	%		8.91	%		10.04	%
Pacific ⁽⁵⁾		13			8			2.54	%		3.01	%		4.03	%
North Central ⁽⁶⁾		12			9			3.30	%		3.89	%		4.72	%
Great Lakes ⁽⁷⁾		10			6			2.95	%		3.50	%		3.96	%
New England ⁽⁸⁾		6			6			4.20	%		4.71	%		5.75	%
Mid-Atlantic ⁽⁹⁾		6			5			4.38	%		5.05	%		5.71	%
Plains ⁽¹⁰⁾		4			2			3.20	%		3.70	%		3.88	%

Total		100	%		100	^%		4.21	%		4.86	%		5.65	%

⁽¹⁾	Total reserves were $768 million as of March 31, 2016.

⁽²⁾	Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina and Tennessee.

⁽³⁾	Arizona, Colorado, Louisiana, New Mexico, Oklahoma, Texas and Utah.

⁽⁴⁾	New Jersey, New York and Pennsylvania.

⁽⁵⁾	Alaska, California, Hawaii, Nevada, Oregon and Washington.

⁽⁶⁾	Illinois, Minnesota, Missouri and Wisconsin.

⁽⁷⁾	Indiana, Kentucky, Michigan and Ohio.

⁽⁸⁾	Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island and Vermont.

⁽⁹⁾	Delaware, Maryland, Virginia, Washington D.C. and West Virginia.

⁽¹⁰⁾	Idaho, Iowa, Kansas, Montana, Nebraska, North Dakota, South Dakota and Wyoming.

103


	Percent of primary risk in-force as of March 31, 2016			Percent of total reserves as of March 31, 2016 ⁽¹⁾			Delinquency rate
	Percent of primary risk in-force as of March 31, 2016			Percent of total reserves as of March 31, 2016 ⁽¹⁾			March 31, 2016			December 31, 2015			March 31, 2015
By State:
California		7	%		3	%		1.91	%		2.26	%		2.75	%
Texas		7	%		3	%		3.30	%		3.90	%		3.97	%
New York		6	%		16	%		8.21	%		9.07	%		10.11	%
Florida		6	%		14	%		6.54	%		7.71	%		10.87	%
Illinois		6	%		6	%		3.98	%		4.70	%		5.98	%
Pennsylvania		4	%		4	%		5.30	%		6.20	%		6.94	%
New Jersey		4	%		13	%		11.38	%		12.71	%		14.40	%
Ohio		4	%		3	%		3.52	%		4.14	%		4.61	%
Michigan		4	%		1	%		2.08	%		2.56	%		2.97	%
North Carolina		3	%		2	%		4.24	%		4.75	%		5.20	%

⁽¹⁾	Total reserves were $768 million as of March 31, 2016.

The following table sets forth the dispersion of our total reserves and primary insurance in-force and risk in-force by year of policy origination and average annual mortgage interest rate as of March 31, 2016:


(Amounts in millions)	Average rate			Percent of totalreserves ⁽¹⁾			Primary insurance in-force		Percent of total			Primary risk in-force		Percent of total
Policy Year
2004 and prior		6.04	%		11.9	%	$	3,714		3.0	%	$	833		2.6	%
2005		5.65	%		11.7			3,310		2.7			898		2.9
2006		5.84	%		17.2			5,498		4.4			1,431		4.6
2007		5.74	%		37.1			14,236		11.5			3,588		11.4
2008		5.28	%		16.8			12,181		9.8			3,089		9.8
2009		4.95	%		0.6			1,679		1.4			393		1.2
2010		4.69	%		0.7			2,121		1.7			534		1.7
2011		4.53	%		0.6			3,020		2.4			781		2.5
2012		3.83	%		0.6			7,749		6.2			2,032		6.5
2013		4.01	%		1.0			13,719		11.1			3,548		11.3
2014		4.40	%		1.4			19,256		15.5			4,886		15.5
2015		4.10	%		0.4			30,277		24.4			7,603		24.2
2016		4.12	%		—			7,336		5.9			1,838		5.8

Total portfolio		4.73	%		100.0	%	$	124,096		100.0	%	$	31,454		100.0	%

⁽¹⁾	Total reserves were $768 million as of March 31, 2016.

104

Canada Mortgage Insurance segment

Trends and conditions

Results of our mortgage insurance business in Canada are affected primarily by changes in the regulatory environment, employment levels, consumer borrowing behavior, lender mortgage-related strategies, including lender servicing practices, and other economic and housing market influences, including interest rate trends, home price appreciation or depreciation, mortgage origination volume, levels and aging of mortgage delinquencies and movements in foreign currency exchange rates. During the first quarter of 2016, the U.S. dollar strengthened against the Canadian dollar as compared with first quarter of 2015, which negatively impacted the results of our mortgage insurance business in Canada as reported in U.S. dollars. However, we experienced some reversal in this trend near the end of the quarter as the Canadian dollar strengthened. Any future movement in foreign exchange rates could impact future results.

We closely monitor economic conditions across Canada due to the impact adverse changes in economic conditions can have on our results. The Canadian gross domestic product is expected to have experienced growth in the first quarter of 2016. The impact of continued low commodity prices, particularly oil, was more than offset by a strengthening non-resource export market in the first quarter of 2016, driven by weakness in the Canadian dollar. Although low commodities prices, particularly oil, continue to negatively impact economic growth, especially in the provinces of Alberta, Newfoundland and Labrador and Saskatchewan, Canadian gross domestic product is expected to grow by 1.7% in 2016 in comparison to 1.2% in 2015, and we anticipate growth rates to vary across different provinces. Federal government stimulus is expected to boost growth despite the uncertainty and volatility in the commodities market. We continue to monitor oil prices as part of our portfolio risk management strategy.

The overnight interest rate in Canada remained flat at 0.50% in the first quarter of 2016. With oil prices remaining well below historical averages and shrinking business investment in the energy sector, the low interest rate environment is expected to continue throughout 2016. Despite the continued pressure on oil prices and its impact to oil-producing provinces, Canada’s unemployment rate remained flat at 7.1% at the end of the first quarter of 2016 compared to the end of 2015. Home sales in Canada increased approximately 12% in the first quarter of 2016 compared to the first quarter in 2015 and approximately 2% compared to the fourth quarter of 2015. The national average home price increased modestly as of the end of the first quarter of 2016 compared to the first quarter of 2015 and the fourth quarter of 2015. New construction and activity in the resale market were strong in British Columbia and Ontario, while there were declines in housing activity in the oil-producing provinces. In 2016, the ending national average home price is expected to increase modestly compared to the end of 2015 and resales are expected to increase from 2015 levels but at a lower rate compared to the increase experienced in the first quarter of 2016. The Canadian housing market is expected to continue to experience significant regional variations with weakness in the oil-producing regions offset by strong housing markets in British Columbia and Ontario.

New delinquencies and the average reserve per delinquency in our mortgage insurance business in Canada increased in the first quarter of 2016 compared to the first quarter of 2015 primarily due to ongoing economic pressure in oil-producing regions. As compared to the fourth quarter of 2015, the increase in new delinquencies and average reserve per delinquency were also attributable to seasonality. Our loss ratio in Canada increased 24% for the three months ended March 31, 2016. We expect our loss ratio in Canada to be modestly higher throughout the remainder of 2016 due to the impact of low oil prices.

In the first quarter of 2016, our mortgage insurance business in Canada experienced a modest reduction in new insurance written volumes due to targeted underwriting changes in certain regions and a slowing housing market in oil-producing regions compared to both the first quarter of 2015 and the fourth quarter of 2015. Additionally, the decrease in new insurance written volumes from the fourth quarter of 2015 was also attributable to seasonality. Given this recent experience as well as the economic uncertainties, we expect modestly lower net premiums written from flow mortgage insurance in 2016 compared to 2015. However, given the size of our more recent books and recent price increases, we expect earned premiums to be moderately higher throughout 2016 than in 2015 (excluding impact from foreign exchange movements).

105

Bulk new insurance written levels were lower in the first quarter of 2016 compared to the first quarter of 2015 due to lower customer demand. In Canada, our new insurance written from bulk mortgage insurance varies from period to period based on a number of factors, including the amount of portfolio mortgages lenders seek to insure, the competitiveness of our pricing and our risk appetite for such mortgage insurance. On June 6, 2015, the Canadian government published draft regulations to limit bulk mortgage insurance to only those mortgages that will be used in Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation securitization programs and to prohibit the use of government guaranteed insured mortgages in private securitizations. The regulations will become effective on July 1, 2016. Although it is difficult to determine the full impact from this and other regulatory changes, the regulations have resulted in an increase in demand for bulk mortgage insurance in Canada in the second quarter of 2016 and we anticipate a decrease in demand from the July 1 effective date forward. To date, we have seen increased demand for bulk mortgage insurance in advance of this most recent change. Subsequent to the end of the first quarter of 2016, our mortgage insurance business in Canada has insured approximately CAD$22.0 billion of bulk mortgage insurance of high credit quality in the first three weeks in April 2016.

We are subject to regulation under the Protection of Residential Mortgage or Hypothecary Insurance Act (Canada) (“PRMHIA”). Under PRMHIA and the Insurance Companies Act (Canada), our mortgage insurance business in Canada is required to meet a minimum capital test (“MCT”) to support its outstanding mortgage insurance in-force. The MCT ratio is calculated based on a methodology prescribed by OSFI. The Department of Finance in Canada has established a target MCT ratio for our mortgage insurance business in Canada of 175% under PRMHIA. We regularly review our capital levels and, after reviewing stress testing results and consulting with OSFI in 2014, we have established an operating MCT holding target of 220% pending the development of the new capital framework for mortgage insurers, which is targeted for implementation in 2017. The holding target of 220% MCT is designed to provide a prudent capital buffer to allow time to take necessary actions should capital levels be pressured by deteriorating macroeconomic conditions. As of March 31, 2016, our MCT ratio was approximately 234%, which was above the MCT holding target.

As previously disclosed, the Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (“OSFI”) plans to update the regulatory capital framework for loans secured by residential real properties for both federally regulated mortgage insurers and deposit-taking institutions. OSFI will consult with federally regulated financial institutions and other stakeholders before making any changes, initially through a directed consultation with the industry in 2016, followed by broader public consultation later in the year. OSFI expects to have final rules in place no later than 2017. The anticipated changes may impact the regulatory capital requirements for our mortgage insurance business in Canada. We will continue to closely monitor the development of this framework.

106

Segment results of operations

Three Months Ended March 31, 2016 Compared to Three Months Ended March 31, 2015

The following table sets forth the results of operations relating to our Canada Mortgage Insurance segment for the periods indicated:


	Three months ended March 31,						Increase (decrease) and percentage change
(Amounts in millions)	2016			2015			2016 vs. 2015
Revenues:
Premiums	$	111		$	119		$	(8	)	(7	)%
Net investment income		29			34			(5	)	(15	)%
Net investment gains (losses)		20			(18	)		38		NM	⁽¹⁾
Policy fees and other income		—			1			(1	)	(100	)%

Total revenues		160			136			24		18	%

Benefits and expenses:
Benefits and other changes in policy reserves		26			25			1		4	%
Acquisition and operating expenses, net of deferrals		18			12			6		50	%
Amortization of deferred acquisition costs and intangibles		9			9			—		—	%
Interest expense		4			5			(1	)	(20	)%

Total benefits and expenses		57			51			6		12	%

Income from continuing operations before income taxes		103			85			18		21	%
Provision for income taxes		29			22			7		32	%

Income from continuing operations		74			63			11		17	%
Less: net income attributable to noncontrolling interests		34			29			5		17	%

Income from continuing operations available to Genworth Financial, Inc.’s common stockholders		40			34			6		18	%
Adjustment to income from continuing operations available to Genworth Financial, Inc.’s common stockholders:
Net investment (gains) losses, net		(7	)		6			(13	)	NM	⁽¹⁾

Net operating income	$	33		$	40		$	(7	)	(18	)%

⁽¹⁾	We define “NM” as not meaningful for increases or decreases greater than 200%.

Net operating income

Net operating income decreased mainly driven by a $6 million decrease attributable to changes in foreign exchange rates during the three months ended March 31, 2016. The decrease was also attributable to higher taxes and operating expenses in the current year.

Revenues

Premiums decreased driven by a $17 million decrease attributable to changes in foreign exchange rates during the three months ended March 31, 2016. Excluding the effects of foreign exchange, premiums increased $9 million primarily from the seasoning of our larger in-force blocks of business in the current year.

Net investment income decreased from a $5 million decrease attributable to changes in foreign exchange rates in the current year.

107

Net investment gains in the current year were primarily driven by derivative gains largely from hedging non-functional currency transactions. Net investment losses in the prior year were mainly from derivative losses largely from hedging non-functional currency transactions, partially offset by net gains from the sale of investment securities. The three months ended March 31, 2016 also included a decrease of $2 million attributable to changes in foreign exchange rates.

Benefits and expenses

Benefits and other changes in policy reserves increased due to an increase in change in reserves of $5 million from an increase in the number of new delinquencies, net of cures, and a higher average reserve per delinquency from higher severity in certain regions in the current year. The three months ended March 31, 2016 also included a decrease of $4 million attributable to changes in foreign exchange rates.

Acquisition and operating expenses, net of deferrals, increased mainly driven by higher stock-based compensation expense from an increase in Genworth Canada’s share price in the current year. The three months ended March 31, 2016 also included a decrease of $2 million attributable to changes in foreign exchange rates.

Provision for income taxes. The effective tax rate increased to 27.8% for three months ended March 31, 2016 from 25.7% for the three months ended March 31, 2015. The increase in the effective tax rate was primarily attributable to decreased tax benefits from lower taxed foreign income. The three months ended March 31, 2016 included a decrease of $4 million attributable to changes in foreign exchange rates.

Canada Mortgage Insurance selected operating performance measures

The following table sets forth selected operating performance measures regarding our Canada Mortgage Insurance segment as of or for the dates indicated:


	As of or for the three months ended March 31,				Increase (decrease) and percentage change
(Amounts in millions)	2016		2015		2016 vs. 2015
Primary insurance in-force	$	317,400	$	288,800	$	28,600		10	%
Risk in-force	$	111,100	$	101,100	$	10,000		10	%
New insurance written	$	5,700	$	8,300	$	(2,600	)	(31	)%
Net premiums written	$	84	$	109	$	(25	)	(23	)%

Primary insurance in-force and risk in-force

Our mortgage insurance business in Canada currently provides 100% coverage on the majority of the loans we insure in that market. For the purpose of representing our risk in-force, we have computed an “effective” risk in-force amount, which recognizes that the loss on any particular loan will be reduced by the net proceeds received upon sale of the property. Effective risk in-force has been calculated by applying to insurance in-force a factor that represents our highest expected average per-claim payment for any one underwriting year over the life of our business in Canada. For the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015, this factor was 35%.

Primary insurance in-force and risk in-force increased primarily as a result of flow new insurance written and bulk mortgage insurance activity. Insurance in-force and risk in-force included decreases of $8.3 billion and $2.9 billion, respectively, attributable to changes in foreign exchange rates during the three months ended March 31, 2016.

New insurance written

New insurance written decreased primarily as a result of lower bulk mortgage insurance activity and lower flow new insurance written. The decrease in flow new insurance written was driven by targeted underwriting

108

changes and a slowing housing market in oil-producing regions in the current year. The three months ended March 31, 2016 included a decrease of $900 million attributable to changes in foreign exchange rates.

Net premiums written

Our mortgage insurance policies in Canada provide for single premiums at the time that loan proceeds are advanced. We initially record the single premiums to unearned premium reserves and recognize the premiums earned over time in accordance with the expected pattern of risk emergence. As of March 31, 2016, our unearned premium reserves were $1,527 million, compared to $1,411 million as of March 31, 2015.

Net premiums written decreased primarily from lower bulk mortgage insurance activity from lower customer demand and lower flow volume from targeted underwriting changes and a slowing housing market in oil-producing regions in the current year. These decreases were partially offset by the price increase on high loan-to-value premiums effective June 1, 2015, which resulted in higher net premiums written. The three months ended March 31, 2016 included a decrease of $13 million attributable to changes in foreign exchange rates.

Loss and expense ratios

The following table sets forth the loss and expense ratios for our Canada Mortgage Insurance segment for the periods indicated:


	Three months ended March 31,						Increase (decrease)
	2016			2015			2016 vs. 2015
Loss ratio		24	%		22	%		2	%
Expense ratio (net earned premiums)		24	%		18	%		6	%
Expense ratio (net premiums written)		32	%		20	%		12	%

The loss ratio is the ratio of incurred losses and loss adjustment expenses to net earned premiums. The expense ratio (net earned premiums) is the ratio of general expenses to net earned premiums. The expense ratio (net premiums written) is the ratio of general expenses to net premiums written. In our mortgage insurance business in Canada, general expenses consist of acquisition and operating expenses, net of deferrals, and amortization of deferred acquisition costs and intangibles.

The loss ratio increased primarily from an increase in the number of new delinquencies, net of cures, and a higher average reserve per delinquency from higher severity in certain regions, partially offset by higher premiums in the current year.

The expense ratio (net earned premiums) increased primarily attributable to higher stock-based compensation expense driven by an increase in Genworth Canada’s share price in the current year, partially offset by higher premiums primarily from the seasoning of our larger in-force blocks of business in the current year.

The expense ratio (net premiums written) increased primarily attributable to higher stock-based compensation expense driven by an increase in Genworth Canada’s share price in the current year and lower net premiums written in the current year.

109

Delinquent loans

The following table sets forth the number of loans insured, the number of delinquent loans and the delinquency rate for our Canada mortgage insurance portfolio as of the dates indicated:


	March 31, 2016			December 31, 2015			March 31, 2015
Primary insured loans in-force		1,860,978			1,835,916			1,704,483
Delinquent loans		2,034			1,829			1,792
Percentage of delinquent loans (delinquency rate)		0.11	%		0.10	%		0.11	%
Flow loans in-force		1,341,636			1,331,773			1,266,626
Flow delinquent loans		1,711			1,550			1,532
Percentage of flow delinquent loans (delinquency rate)		0.13	%		0.12	%		0.12	%
Bulk loans in-force		519,342			504,143			437,857
Bulk delinquent loans		323			279			260
Percentage of bulk delinquent loans (delinquency rate)		0.06	%		0.06	%		0.06	%

Flow mortgage loans in-force increased from new policies written and bulk mortgage loans in-force increased from bulk activity. The number of delinquent loans increased primarily from ongoing economic pressures in oil producing regions.

As a part of enhanced lender reporting, we receive updated outstanding loans in-force in Canada from most of our customers on a quarter lag. Based on the data provided by lenders, the 2016 delinquency rate as of December 31, 2015 was approximately 0.21%, reflecting a lower number of outstanding loans and related policies in-force compared to our reported policies in-force using the original terms of the loan.

Primary insurance delinquency rates differ by the various provinces and territories of Canada at any one time depending upon economic conditions and cyclical growth patterns. The table below sets forth our primary delinquency rates for the various provinces and territories of Canada by our risk in-force as of the dates indicated. Delinquency rates are shown by region based upon the location of the underlying property, rather than the location of the lender.


	Percent of primary risk in-force as of March 31, 2016			Delinquency rate
	Percent of primary risk in-force as of March 31, 2016			March 31, 2016			December 31, 2015			March 31, 2015
By province and territory:
Ontario		47	%		0.05	%		0.05	%		0.05	%
Alberta		17			0.16	%		0.12	%		0.09	%
British Columbia		14			0.06	%		0.08	%		0.13	%
Quebec		13			0.20	%		0.19	%		0.19	%
Saskatchewan		3			0.21	%		0.17	%		0.15	%
Nova Scotia		2			0.20	%		0.18	%		0.23	%
Manitoba		2			0.10	%		0.09	%		0.07	%
New Brunswick		1			0.21	%		0.20	%		0.22	%
All other		1			0.14	%		0.13	%		0.12	%

Total		100	%		0.11	%		0.10	%		0.11	%

Delinquency rates increased slightly primarily drive by more commodity dependent regions such as Alberta and Saskatchewan due to economic pressures related to low commodity prices.

110

Australia Mortgage Insurance segment

Trends and conditions

Results of our mortgage insurance business in Australia are affected primarily by changes in regulatory environments, employment levels, consumer borrowing behavior, lender mortgage-related strategies, including lender servicing practices, and other economic and housing market influences, including interest rate trends, home price appreciation or depreciation, mortgage origination volume, levels and aging of mortgage delinquencies and movements in foreign currency exchange rates. During the first quarter of 2016, the U.S. dollar strengthened against the Australian dollar as compared with first quarter of 2015, which negatively impacted the results of our mortgage insurance business in Australia as reported in U.S. dollars. However, the average rates were relatively consistent with the prior quarter. Any future movement in foreign exchange rates could impact future results.

In Australia, the overall economy continued to expand during the first quarter of 2016, with anticipated moderate growth in the gross domestic product in the first quarter of 2016, reflecting contributions from tourism and resource exports, offset by weak domestic demand. At the same time, housing activity improved primarily from sustained low interest rates, with the cash rate remaining at 2.0% through the first quarter of 2016. Job creation slowed in the first quarter of 2016 with a minimal addition of jobs reported during the period. The March 2016 unemployment rate fell to 5.7% from 5.8% at the end of 2015.

Home prices in Australia continued to appreciate in the first quarter of 2016, with March 2016 home values approximately 6% higher than a year ago and approximately 2% higher than at the end of 2015. The Sydney and Melbourne housing markets continue to be the major driver with annual home price growth of approximately 7% and 10%, respectively, as of the end of the first quarter of 2016. We expect home price appreciation for 2016 will moderate compared to 2015 levels.

Our mortgage insurance business in Australia had a higher average reserve per delinquency in the first quarter of 2016 compared to the first quarter of 2015 as a result of higher concentration of later stage delinquencies. Compared to the fourth quarter of 2015, delinquencies increased due to seasonality as well as economic pressures primarily in commodity-dependent regions within Queensland and Western Australia. China’s economic slowdown has also impacted mining demand and investments in these areas. In addition, these regions are impacted by changes in commodity prices, which have remained below historical levels. If these regional trends continue, the loss ratio in the aggregate in Australia, which was 26% for the three months ended March 31, 2016, could increase. We will continue to closely monitor these economic conditions and assess their impact on our business.

In Australia, gross written premiums in the first quarter of 2016 were lower compared to the first quarter of 2015 partly due to the termination of a customer relationship with respect to new business effective in the second quarter of 2015. Compared to both the fourth quarter of 2015 and the first quarter of 2015, our mortgage insurance business in Australia experienced a decrease in gross written premiums driven by a reduction in high loan-to-value mortgage origination volume resulting from regulatory changes restricting loans originated for investment properties and high loan-to-value lending as the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (“APRA”) continues to focus on lending standards, investment lending and serviceability. Our average premium rate in Australia has also been impacted by the tighter lending standards resulting in a shift of our flow new insurance written to lower loan-to-value products that have a lower premium rate and risk. Consequently, we expect high loan-to-value mortgages in proportion to total originations to be lower in 2016 compared to 2015. This will likely result in a decrease in both gross written premiums and earned premiums in 2016 despite the price increase, which was effective in March 2016.

Our mortgage insurance business in Australia evaluates its capital position in relation to the Prescribed Capital Amount (“PCA”) as determined by APRA, utilizing the Internal Capital Adequacy Assessment Process (“ICAAP”) as the framework to ensure that our Australia group of companies as a whole, and each regulated

111

entity, are independently capitalized to meet regulatory requirements. As of March 31, 2016, the estimated PCA ratio of our mortgage insurance business in Australia was approximately 168% representing an increase from the 159% as of December 31, 2015 as a result of changes to reinsurance programs that were effective in 2016 and from capital releases on the seasoning of in-force business outpacing the capital required for the lower levels of new business. In the first quarter of 2016, Genworth Mortgage Insurance Australia Limited (“Genworth Australia”) announced a plan to execute an AUD$202 million capital reduction initiative in the second quarter of 2016. The plan is designed to return a portion of surplus capital equitably to all of its shareholders and ensure Genworth Australia maintains an efficient capital structure. This capital reduction plan has received APRA approval but is subject to Genworth Australia shareholder approval. As of March 31, 2016, if the plan was approved and executed, our estimated PCA ratio in our mortgage insurance business would have decreased to approximately 155%.

Segment results of operations

Three Months Ended March 31, 2016 Compared to Three Months Ended March 31, 2015

The following table sets forth the results of operations relating to our Australia Mortgage Insurance segment for the periods indicated:


	Three months ended March 31,					Increase (decrease) and percentage change
(Amounts in millions)	2016		2015			2016 vs. 2015
Revenues:
Premiums	$	81	$	89		$	(8	)	(9	)%
Net investment income		24		32			(8	)	(25	)%
Net investment gains (losses)		—		1			(1	)	(100	)%
Policy fees and other income		—		(4	)		4		100	%

Total revenues		105		118			(13	)	(11	)%

Benefits and expenses:
Benefits and other changes in policy reserves		21		14			7		50	%
Acquisition and operating expenses, net of deferrals		19		22			(3	)	(14	)%
Amortization of deferred acquisition costs and intangibles		3		5			(2	)	(40	)%
Interest expense		3		2			1		50	%

Total benefits and expenses		46		43			3		7	%

Income from continuing operations before income taxes		59		75			(16	)	(21	)%
Provision for income taxes		19		24			(5	)	(21	)%

Income from continuing operations		40		51			(11	)	(22	)%
Less: net income attributable to noncontrolling interests		21		21			—		—	%

Income from continuing operations available to Genworth Financial, Inc.’s common stockholders		19		30			(11	)	(37	)%
Adjustment to income from continuing operations available to Genworth Financial, Inc.’s common stockholders:
Net investment (gains) losses, net		—		—			—		—	%

Net operating income	$	19	$	30		$	(11	)	(37	)%

Net operating income

Net operating income decreased primarily driven by higher losses and lower net investment income in the current year. The decrease was also from the additional sale of shares of this business in May 2015, which reduced our ownership percentage to 52.0%. The three months ended March 31, 2016 also included a decrease of $3 million attributable to changes in foreign exchange rates.

112

Revenues

Premiums decreased driven by a $10 million decrease attributable to changes in foreign exchange rates during the three months ended March 31, 2016. Excluding the effects of foreign exchange, premiums increased primarily as a result of the refinements to premium recognition factors made in the third quarter of 2015, partially offset by the seasoning of our prior year in-force blocks of business and a decrease in premiums from a lower loan-to-value mix and flow volume in the current year.

Net investment income decreased primarily from lower average invested assets and a $3 million decrease attributable to changes in foreign exchange rates during the three months ended March 31, 2016.

Policy fees and other income increased primarily due to non-functional currency transactions attributable to remeasurement and repayment of intercompany loans in the prior year that did not recur.

Benefits and expenses

Benefits and other changes in policy reserves increased due to a favorable adjustment of $7 million in the first quarter of 2015 related to the expected recovery of claims paid in prior periods that did not recur. The increase was also attributable to a higher average reserve per delinquency from aging of existing delinquencies primarily in commodity-dependent regions, partially offset by favorable cures in the current year. The three months ended March 31, 2016 included a decrease of $3 million attributable to changes in foreign exchange rates.

Acquisition and operating expenses, net of deferrals, decreased primarily from a decrease of $2 million attributable to changes in foreign exchange rates during three months ended March 31, 2016.

Provision for income taxes. The effective tax rate increased to 32.7% for the three months ended March 31, 2016 from 30.5% for the three months ended March 31, 2015. The increase in the effective tax rate was primarily attributable to decreased tax benefits from lower taxed foreign income. The three months ended March 31, 2016 included a decrease of $2 million attributable to changes in foreign exchange rates.

Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests was flat driven by a $3 million decrease attributable to changes in foreign exchange rates during the three months ended March 31, 2016. Excluding the effects of foreign exchange, net income attributable to noncontrolling interests increased primarily related the additional sale of shares of this business in May 2015, which reduced our ownership percentage to 52.0%.

Australia Mortgage Insurance selected operating performance measures

The following table sets forth selected operating performance measures regarding our Australia Mortgage Insurance segment as of or for the dates indicated:


	As of or for the three months ended March 31,				Increase (decrease) and percentage change
(Amounts in millions)	2016		2015		2016 vs. 2015
Primary insurance in-force	$	246,800	$	240,900	$	5,900		2	%
Risk in-force	$	86,000	$	84,300	$	1,700		2	%
New insurance written	$	4,400	$	5,800	$	(1,400	)	(24	)%
Net premiums written	$	47	$	87	$	(40	)	(46	)%

Primary insurance in-force and risk in-force

Our mortgage insurance business in Australia currently provides 100% coverage on the majority of the loans we insure in those markets. For the purpose of representing our risk in-force, we have computed an “effective”

113

risk in-force amount, which recognizes that the loss on any particular loan will be reduced by the net proceeds received upon sale of the property. Effective risk in-force has been calculated by applying to insurance in-force a factor that represents our highest expected average per-claim payment for any one underwriting year over the life of our business in Australia. For the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015, this factor was 35%. We also we have certain risk share arrangements where we provide pro-rata coverage of certain loans rather than 100% coverage. As a result, for loans with these risk share arrangements, the applicable pro-rata coverage amount provided is used when applying the factor.

Primary insurance in-force and risk in-force increased primarily from flow new insurance written. Insurance in-force and risk in-force also included increases of $1.3 billion and $0.5 billion, respectively, attributable to changes in foreign exchange rates during the three months ended March 31, 2016.

New insurance written

New insurance written decreased mainly attributable to a smaller high loan-to-value originations market primarily driven by a reduction in the amount of risk lenders are willing to take in the current year resulting from regulatory focus on the market, as well as the impact of the termination of a customer relationship with respect to new business in the second quarter of 2015. The three months ended March 31, 2016 included a decrease of $500 million attributable to changes in foreign exchange rates.

Net premiums written

Most of our Australian mortgage insurance policies provide for single premiums at the time that loan proceeds are advanced. We initially record the single premiums to unearned premium reserves and recognize the premiums earned over time in accordance with the expected pattern of risk emergence. As of March 31, 2016, our unearned premium reserves were $976 million, compared to $1,036 million as of March 31, 2015.

Net premiums written decreased primarily from changes in the loan-to-value mix in the current year, as well as the impact of the termination of a customer relationship with respect to new business in the second quarter of 2015. The three months ended March 31, 2016 included a decrease of $6 million attributable to changes in foreign exchange rates.

Loss and expense ratios

The following table sets forth the loss and expense ratios for our Australia Mortgage Insurance segment for the periods indicated:


	Three months ended March 31,						Increase (decrease)
	2016			2015			2016 vs. 2015
Loss ratio		26	%		15	%		11	%
Expense ratio (net earned premiums)		27	%		30	%		(3	)%
Expense ratio (net premiums written)		47	%		31	%		16	%

The loss ratio is the ratio of incurred losses and loss adjustment expenses to net earned premiums. The expense ratio (net earned premiums) is the ratio of general expenses to net earned premiums. The expense ratio (net premiums written) is the ratio of general expenses to net premiums written. In our mortgage insurance business in Australia, general expenses consist of acquisition and operating expenses, net of deferrals, and amortization of deferred acquisition costs and intangibles.

The loss ratio increased primarily driven by a favorable adjustment of $7 million in the first quarter of 2015 related to the expected recovery of claims paid in prior periods that did not recur. The increase was also attributable to a higher average reserve per delinquency from aging of existing delinquencies primarily in

114

commodity-dependent regions, partially offset by favorable cures in the current year. The favorable adjustment decreased the loss ratio by nine percentage points for the three months ended March 31, 2015.

The expense ratio (net earned premiums) decreased from higher premiums from refinements to premium recognition factors made in the third quarter of 2015, partially offset by the seasoning of our prior year in-force blocks of business and a decrease in premiums from a lower loan-to-value mix and flow volume in the current year. The decrease was also attributable to lower operating expenses in the current year.

The expense ratio (net premiums written) increased primarily from lower net premiums written in the current year.

Delinquent loans

The following table sets forth the number of loans insured, the number of delinquent loans and the delinquency rate for our Australia mortgage insurance portfolio as of the dates indicated:


	March 31, 2016			December 31, 2015			March 31, 2015
Primary insured loans in-force		1,479,544			1,478,434			1,498,197
Delinquent loans		5,889			5,552			5,378
Percentage of delinquent loans (delinquency rate)		0.40	%		0.38	%		0.36	%
Flow loans in-force		1,366,914			1,364,628			1,382,156
Flow delinquent loans		5,633			5,317			5,112
Percentage of flow delinquent loans (delinquency rate)		0.41	%		0.39	%		0.37	%
Bulk loans in-force		112,630			113,806			116,041
Bulk delinquent loans		256			235			266
Percentage of bulk delinquent loans (delinquency rate)		0.23	%		0.21	%		0.23	%

Flow loans in-force and bulk loans in-force decreased compared to March 31, 2015 from policy cancellations. Flow delinquent loans increased as new delinquencies more than offset cures and paid claims primarily as a result of economic pressures in commodity dependent regions.

Primary insurance delinquency rates differ by the various states and territories of Australia at any one time depending upon economic conditions and cyclical growth patterns. The table below sets forth our primary delinquency rates for the states and territories of Australia by our risk in-force as of the dates indicated. Delinquency rates are shown by region based upon the location of the underlying property, rather than the location of the lender.


	Percent of primary risk in-force as of March 31, 2016			Delinquency rate
	Percent of primary risk in-force as of March 31, 2016			March 31, 2016			December 31, 2015			March 31, 2015
By state and territory:
New South Wales		29	%		0.29	%		0.27	%		0.29	%
Queensland		23			0.55	%		0.53	%		0.50	%
Victoria		23			0.35	%		0.33	%		0.32	%
Western Australia		11			0.53	%		0.46	%		0.37	%
South Australia		6			0.52	%		0.51	%		0.48	%
Australian Capital Territory		3			0.18	%		0.17	%		0.13	%
Tasmania		2			0.38	%		0.32	%		0.28	%
New Zealand		2			0.13	%		0.17	%		0.27	%
Northern Territory		1			0.21	%		0.17	%		0.20	%

Total		100	%		0.40	%		0.38	%		0.36	%

115

Delinquency rates increased in the current year primarily from higher new delinquencies in Queensland and Western Australia mainly attributable to economic pressures.

U.S. Life Insurance segment

Trends and conditions

Results of our U.S. life insurance businesses depend significantly upon the extent to which our actual future experience is consistent with assumptions and methodologies we have used in calculating our reserves. Many factors can affect the reserves in our U.S. life insurance businesses and because they are not known in advance, changes in assumptions and actual experience over time, are difficult to accurately predict and are inherently uncertain, and we cannot determine with precision the ultimate amounts we will pay for actual claims or the timing of those payments. We perform loss recognition testing to ensure that the current reserves along with the present value of future gross premiums are sufficient to cover the present value of future expected claims and expense, as well as recover the unamortized portion of DAC and, if any, PVFP. If the loss recognition test indicates a deficiency in the ability to pay all future claims and expenses, including the amortization of DAC and PVFP, a loss is recognized in earnings as an impairment of the DAC and/or PVFP balance and, if the loss is greater than the DAC and/or PVFP balance, by an increase in reserves. In our U.S. life insurance businesses, our liability for policy and contract claims is reviewed quarterly and we conduct a detailed review of our claim reserve assumptions annually typically during the third quarter of each year. Our liability for future policy benefits is reviewed at least annually as a part of our loss recognition testing typically performed in the third or fourth quarter of each year. As part of loss recognition testing, we also review the recoverability of DAC and PVFP at least annually. In addition, we perform cash flow testing separately for each of our U.S. life insurance companies on a statutory accounting basis annually. In 2016, for our U.S. life insurance businesses, we plan to perform our annual review of claims reserve assumptions in the third quarter of 2016 and our loss recognition testing in the fourth quarter of 2016.

We will continue to monitor our experience and assumptions closely and make changes to our assumptions and methodologies, as appropriate. In our assumption review in 2015, we looked at a number of assumptions, including older age mortality in our life insurance products and shock lapse in our term universal life insurance product as well as assumptions in our group long-term care insurance products, for which we did not make any changes at that time. We will review these and other assumptions again in 2016 with the benefit of updated experience and comparisons to industry experience, where appropriate, and we will likely make changes to at least one or more of these or other assumptions with a resulting negative impact. We do not know whether such impact would be material or whether it would be offset by impacts from other assumption changes that may or may not occur. Even small changes in assumptions or small deviations of actual experience from assumptions can have, and in the past have had, material impacts on our DAC amortization, reserve levels, results of operations and financial condition.

In addition, we intend to continue to enhance our modeling capabilities for various of our businesses, including for our long-term care insurance projection assumptions where we are migrating to a new modeling system in 2016 or later. This new modeling system is intended to segregate and refine assumptions based upon healthy and disabled insured lives, as compared to our total insured lives estimate we use today.

Long-term care insurance

Results of our long-term care insurance business are influenced primarily by sales, morbidity, mortality, persistency, investment yields, expenses, ability to achieve rate actions, changes in regulations and reinsurance. Sales of our products are impacted by the relative competitiveness of our current ratings, product features, pricing and commission levels, future actions by rating agencies and the impact of in-force rate actions on distribution and consumer demand. Changes in regulations or government programs, including long-term care insurance rate action legislation, could impact our long-term care insurance business either positively or negatively.

116

As previously disclosed, we updated our assumptions and methodologies in 2014 primarily impacting claim termination rates and benefit utilization rates, resulting in increases to our long-term care insurance claim reserves. In connection with these updated assumptions and methodologies, we now establish higher claim reserves on new claims, which decreases earnings in the period in which the higher reserves are recorded. Additionally, average claim reserves for new claims are higher as the mix of claims continues to evolve, with an increasing number of policies with higher daily benefit amounts, unlimited benefit pools and higher inflation factors going on claim. Also, we expect growth in new claims as our blocks of business continue to age. Consequently, results of our long-term care insurance business were modest in 2015 and we expect results to continue to be modest in 2016 with some variability period to period. We will continue to regularly review our methodologies and assumptions in light of emerging experience and may be required to make further adjustments to our long-term care insurance claim reserves in the future, which could also impact our loss recognition testing results. Any further materially adverse changes to our claim reserves or changes as a result of loss recognition testing may have a materially negative impact on our results of operations, financial condition and business.

We experience volatility in our loss ratios caused by variances in policy terminations, claim terminations, claim severity and claim counts. Our approved premium rate actions may also cause fluctuations in our loss ratios during the period when reserves are adjusted to reflect policyholders taking reduced benefits or non-forfeiture options within their policy coverage. In addition, we periodically review our reserve assumptions and methodologies based upon developing experience, which may result in changes to claim reserves and loss recognition testing results, causing volatility in our operating results and loss ratios. Our loss ratio was 68% for the three months ended March 31, 2016 compared to 72% for the three months ended March 31, 2015.

Our long-term care insurance sales decreased 36% during the three months ended March 31, 2016 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2015. Sales decreased primarily due to our lower ratings, higher pricing on newer products and certain distributor suspensions driven by recent rating agency actions. Following the adverse rating actions after the announcement of our results for the fourth quarter of 2015, distributors, representing in excess of 20% of our 2015 individual long-term care insurance sales, suspended distribution of our long-term care insurance products. We expect that our sales will continue to be adversely impacted by our current ratings.

In the fourth quarter of 2014, we began filing for regulatory approval of an enhanced product to improve competitiveness, while meeting our targeted returns, by, among other things, reducing premium rates, benefit levels and adjusting other coverage options. As of April 4, 2016, this enhanced product had been filed in 47 states, approved in 45 states and launched in 44 states, with an additional state targeted to be launched in the second half of 2016. In support of this new product, we are investing in targeted distribution and marketing initiatives to increase long-term care insurance sales. In addition, we are evaluating market trends and sales and investing in the development of products and distribution strategies that we believe will help expand the long-term care insurance market over time and meet broader consumer needs.

We also manage risk and capital allocated to our long-term care insurance business through utilization of external reinsurance in the form of coinsurance. We executed external reinsurance agreements to reinsure 20% of all sales of our individual long-term care insurance products that have been introduced since early 2013. External new business reinsurance levels vary and are dependent on a number of factors, including price, availability, risk tolerance and capital levels. Over time, there can be no assurance that affordable, or any, reinsurance will continue to be available. We also have external reinsurance on some older blocks of business which includes a treaty on a yearly renewable term basis on business that was written between 1998 and 2003. This yearly renewable term reinsurance provides coverage for claims on those policies for 15 years after the policy was written. After 15 years, reinsurance coverage ends for policies not on claim, while reinsurance coverage continues for policies on claim until the claim ends. Since 2013, we have seen, and may continue to see through 2018, an increase in benefit costs if and when those policies that are no longer covered under this reinsurance go on claim. In addition, we have a portion of our long-term care insurance business reinsured internally by BLAIC, one of our Bermuda-domiciled captive reinsurance subsidiaries. One of our strategic priorities is to repatriate all of the existing business, including our long-term care insurance business, held in BLAIC. The timing of the

117

repatriation is expected to occur in 2016. If we implement the repatriation (following receipt of required regulatory approvals), there will be no impact on our consolidated results of operations and financial condition prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP as the financial impact of this reinsurance eliminates in consolidation, although there is expected to be an adverse impact on Genworth Life Insurance Company’s risk-based capital ratio, depending on the specifics and timing of a transaction.

As a result of ongoing challenges in our long-term care insurance business, we continue pursuing initiatives to improve the risk and profitability profile of our business including: premium rate increases and benefit reductions on our in-force policies; product refinements; changes to our current product offerings in certain states; new distribution strategies; investing in care coordination capabilities and service offerings; refining underwriting requirements; managing expense levels; actively exploring additional reinsurance strategies; executing investment strategies targeting higher returns; enhancing our financial and actuarial analytical capabilities; and considering other actions to improve the performance of the overall business. These efforts include a plan for significant future in-force premium rate increases on issued policies. For an update on rate actions, refer to “—Significant Developments—U.S. Life Insurance.” In the past, we have suspended new sales, and will consider taking similar actions in the future, in states where we are unable to obtain satisfactory rate increases on in-force policies as we did in Massachusetts, New Hampshire and Vermont. The approval process for in-force premium rate increases and the amount and timing of the rate increases approved vary by state. In certain states, the decision to approve or disapprove a rate increase can take several years. Upon approval, insureds are provided with written notice of the increase and increases are generally applied on the insured’s next policy anniversary date. Therefore, the benefits of any rate increase are not fully realized until the implementation cycle is complete and are therefore expected to be realized over time.

Continued low interest rates have also put pressure on the profitability and returns of our long-term care insurance business as higher yielding investments have matured and been replaced with lower-yielding investments. We seek to manage the impact of low interest rates through asset-liability management and interest rate hedging strategies for a portion of our long-term care insurance product cash flows.

Life insurance

Results of our life insurance business are impacted primarily by sales, competitor actions, mortality, persistency, investment yields, expenses, reinsurance and statutory reserve requirements, among other factors.

On February 4, 2016, because of low sales and our lower ratings, we announced our decision to suspend sales of our traditional life insurance products after the first quarter of 2016. Life insurance sales decreased 47% during the three months ended March 31, 2016 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2015 and decreased 10% in the first quarter of 2016 from the fourth quarter of 2015. The decrease in our sales was predominantly related to our decision to suspend sales, our competitive positioning in the marketplace and distributor suspensions following adverse rating actions.

In 2015 and during the first quarter of 2016, mortality experience was favorable to pricing expectations for our term life insurance products but unfavorable for our universal life insurance products. Mortality levels may deviate each period from historical trends. Between 1999 and 2009, we had a significant increase in term life insurance sales, as compared to 1998 and prior years. As our 15-year term life insurance policies written in 1999 and 2000 transition to their post-level guaranteed premium rate period, we have experienced lower persistency compared to our pricing and valuation assumptions. The blocks of business issued since 2000 vary in size as compared to the 1999 and 2000 blocks of business. Accordingly, in the future, as additional 10-, 15- and 20-year level premium period blocks enter their post-level guaranteed premium rate period, we may experience volatility in amortization of deferred acquisition costs, premiums and mortality experience, which may reduce profitability or create losses in our term life insurance products, in amounts that could be material, if persistency is lower than our original assumptions as it has been on our 10- and 15-year business written in 1999 and 2000. We have also taken actions to mitigate potentially unfavorable impacts through the use of reinsurance, particularly for certain term life insurance policies issued between 2001 and 2004.

118

A portion of our life insurance reserves are financed through captive reinsurance structures. The financing cost of certain captive reinsurance structures is determined in part by the financial strength ratings of our principal life insurance subsidiaries. As a result of the ratings downgrade of our principal life insurance subsidiaries in February 2016, the cost of financing increased for a portion of our captive-financed reserves by approximately $1 million per quarter. However, in April 2016, we successfully refinanced an existing reinsurance structure, which will improve after-tax earnings by $15 million to $20 million on an annual basis by reducing interest expense.

Prior to execution of the repatriation of business reinsured to BLAIC, we plan to replace term life insurance reinsured with BLAIC with third-party reinsurance, which we expect to negatively impact our results of operations.

Fixed annuities

Results of our fixed annuities business are affected primarily by investment performance, interest rate levels, the slope of the interest rate yield curve, net interest spreads, equity market conditions, mortality, persistency, expense and commission levels, product sales, competitor actions and competitiveness of our offerings.

On February 4, 2016, we announced our decision to suspend sales of our traditional fixed annuity products in the first quarter of 2016. Sales of fixed annuities decreased 48% during the three months ended March 31, 2016 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2015. The decrease was largely as a result of our lower rating, distributor actions and our decision to suspend sales.

We monitor and change crediting rates on fixed annuities on a regular basis to maintain spreads and targeted returns. For fixed indexed annuities, equity market performance and volatility could result in additional gains or losses, although associated hedging activities are expected to partially mitigate these impacts.

119

Segment results of operations

Three Months Ended March 31, 2016 Compared to Three Months Ended March 31, 2015

The following table sets forth the results of operations relating to our U.S. Life Insurance segment for the periods indicated:


	Three months ended March 31,						Increase (decrease) and percentage change
(Amounts in millions)	2016			2015			2016 vs. 2015
Revenues:
Premiums	$	436		$	778		$	(342	)	(44	)%
Net investment income		684			671			13		2	%
Net investment gains (losses)		(16	)		(4	)		(12	)	NM	⁽¹⁾
Policy fees and other income		177			180			(3	)	(2	)%

Total revenues		1,281			1,625			(344	)	(21	)%

Benefits and expenses:
Benefits and other changes in policy reserves		758			1,091			(333	)	(31	)%
Interest credited		144			150			(6	)	(4	)%
Acquisition and operating expenses, net of deferrals		165			163			2		1	%
Amortization of deferred acquisition costs and intangibles		78			73			5		7	%
Interest expense		28			25			3		12	%

Total benefits and expenses		1,173			1,502			(329	)	(22	)%

Income from continuing operations before income taxes		108			123			(15	)	(12	)%
Provision for income taxes		39			43			(4	)	(9	)%

Income from continuing operations available to Genworth Financial, Inc.’s common stockholders		69			80			(11	)	(14	)%
Adjustments to income from continuing operations available to Genworth Financial, Inc.’s common stockholders:
Net investment (gains) losses, net		7			1			6		NM	⁽¹⁾
(Gains) losses from life block transactions, net		6			—			6		NM	⁽¹⁾
Expenses related to restructuring, net		9			—			9		NM	⁽¹⁾

Net operating income	$	91		$	81		$	10		12	%

⁽¹⁾	We define “NM” as not meaningful for increases or decreases greater than 200%.

The following table sets forth net operating income for the businesses included in our U.S. Life Insurance segment for the periods indicated:


	Three months ended March 31,				Increase (decrease) and percentage change
(Amounts in millions)	2016		2015		2016 vs. 2015
Net operating income:
Long-term care insurance	$	34	$	10	$	24		NM	⁽¹⁾
Life insurance		31		40		(9	)	(23	)%
Fixed annuities		26		31		(5	)	(16	)%

Total net operating income	$	91	$	81	$	10		12	%

⁽¹⁾	We define “NM” as not meaningful for increases or decreases greater than 200%.

120

Net operating income

•

Our long-term care insurance business increased $24 million largely as a result of higher premiums and reduced benefits of $52 million in the current year from in-force rate actions approved and implemented, partially offset principally by lower terminations, higher severity on new claims and a $4 million unfavorable correction related to the calculation on our in-force rate actions in the current year. The prior year also included net unfavorable adjustments of $7 million reflecting a refinement to a reserve calculation on our acquired block of business, partially offset primarily by a favorable correction related to reinsurance that did not recur.

•

Our life insurance business decreased $9 million principally from unfavorable mortality in our universal life insurance products and higher term universal life insurance reserves reflecting our updated assumptions from the fourth quarter of 2015.

•

Our fixed annuities business decreased $5 million primarily related to less favorable mortality in the current year.

Revenues

Premiums

•

Our long-term care insurance business increased $29 million largely from $31 million of increased premiums in the current year from in-force rate actions approved and implemented.

•

Our life insurance business decreased $364 million attributable to higher ceded reinsurance in the current year. We initially ceded $326 million of certain term life insurance premiums under a new reinsurance treaty as part of a life block transaction in the current year.

•

Our fixed annuities business decreased $7 million principally from lower sales of our life-contingent products resulting from the suspension of product offerings in the current year.

Net investment income

•

Our long-term care insurance business increased $16 million largely from higher average invested assets due to growth of our in-force block, partially offset by lower reinvestment yields in the current year.

•

Our life insurance business increased $6 million due to higher favorable prepayment speed adjustments in the current year.

•

Our fixed annuities business decreased $9 million largely due to lower average invested assets and lower gains of $2 million from bond calls and mortgage loan prepayments in the current year.

Net investment gains (losses). The increase in net investment losses was predominantly related to our fixed annuities business principally from derivative losses in the current year compared to derivative gains in the prior year, higher net losses from the sale of investment securities and higher impairments. These increases were partially offset by gains on embedded derivatives related to our fixed indexed annuities in the current year compared to losses in the prior year.

Policy fees and other income. The decrease was primarily attributable to our life insurance business largely related to lower production and a decrease in our term universal and universal life insurance in-force blocks in the current year.

Benefits and expenses

Benefits and other changes in policy reserves

•

Our long-term care insurance business increased $10 million principally from aging and growth of the in-force block, lower terminations, higher severity on new claims, a $7 million unfavorable correction

121

related to a calculation on our in-force rate actions and incremental reserves of $4 million recorded in connection with an accrual for profits followed by losses in the current year. These increases were partially offset by reduced benefits of $52 million in the current year related to in-force rate actions approved and implemented. The prior year also included net unfavorable adjustments of $11 million reflecting a refinement to a reserve calculation on our acquired block of business, partially offset primarily by a favorable correction related to reinsurance.

•

Our life insurance business decreased $337 million principally related to higher ceded reinsurance in the current year. We initially ceded $331 million of certain term life insurance reserves under a new reinsurance treaty as part of a life block transaction. This decrease was partially offset by unfavorable mortality in our universal life insurance products and higher term universal life insurance reserves reflecting our updated assumptions from the fourth quarter of 2015.

•

Our fixed annuities business decreased $6 million largely attributable to lower sales of our life-contingent products and lower interest credited, partially offset by less favorable mortality in the current year.

Interest credited. The decrease in interest credited was mainly related to our fixed annuities business driven by a decrease in average account values and lower crediting rates in the current year.

Acquisition and operating expenses, net of deferrals

•

Our long-term care insurance business was flat as a $3 million restructuring charge and a $3 million write-off of a receivable associated with a disputed reinsurance claim was offset by lower production in the current year.

•

Our life insurance business was flat as a $5 million restructuring charge was offset by lower production in the current year.

•

Our fixed annuities business increased $2 million largely attributable to a $4 million restructuring charge, partially offset by lower production in the current year.

Amortization of deferred acquisition costs and intangibles

•

Our life insurance business increased $3 million largely related to the write-off of $3 million of computer software in connection with a restructuring charge in the current year.

•

Our fixed annuities business increased $2 million largely attributable to a less favorable unlocking primarily related to lapses in the current year.

Interest expense. Interest expense increased driven by our life insurance business principally from the write-off of $9 million of deferred borrowing costs associated with our non-recourse funding obligations as part of a life block transaction and from the impact of credit rating downgrades which increased the cost of financing term life insurance reserves, partially offset by lower letter of credit fees in the current year.

Provision for income taxes. The effective tax rate was 35.3% for the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015.

122

U.S. Life Insurance selected operating performance measures

Long-term care insurance

The following table sets forth selected operating performance measures regarding our individual and group long-term care insurance products for the periods indicated:


	Three months ended March 31,						Increase (decrease) and percentage change
(Amounts in millions)	2016			2015			2016 vs. 2015
Net earned premiums:
Individual long-term care insurance	$	591		$	561		$	30		5	%
Group long-term care insurance		27			28			(1	)	(4	)%

Total	$	618		$	589		$	29		5	%

Annualized first-year premiums and deposits:
Individual long-term care insurance	$	5		$	10		$	(5	)	(50	)%
Group long-term care insurance		2			1			1		100	%

Annualized first-year premiums and deposits	$	7		$	11		$	(4	)	(36	)%

Loss ratio		68	%		72	%		(4	)%

The loss ratio is the ratio of benefits and other changes in reserves less tabular interest on reserves less loss adjustment expenses to net earned premiums.

Net earned premiums increased mainly attributable to $31 million of increased premiums in the current year from in-force rate actions approved and implemented.

Annualized first-year premiums and deposits decreased principally from reduced sales due to higher pricing on newer products and certain distributor suspensions driven by recent rating agency actions.

The loss ratio decreased for the three months ended March 31, 2016 largely attributable to $83 million of higher premiums and reduced benefits in the current year related to in-force rate actions approved and implemented, partially offset by lower terminations, higher severity on new claims, a $7 million unfavorable correction related to a calculation on our in-force rate actions and incremental reserves of $4 million recorded in connection with an accrual for profits followed by losses in the current year. The prior year also included net unfavorable adjustments of $11 million reflecting a refinement to a reserve calculation on our acquired block of business, partially offset primarily by a favorable correction related to reinsurance.

123

Life insurance

The following table sets forth selected operating performance measures regarding our life insurance business as of or for the dates indicated:


	Three months ended March 31,					Increase (decrease) and percentage change
(Amounts in millions)	2016			2015		2016 vs. 2015
Term and whole life insurance
Net earned premiums	$	(185	)	$	179	$	(364	)	NM	⁽¹⁾
Sales		5			9		(4	)	(44	)%
Life insurance in-force, net of reinsurance		228,958			315,478		(86,520	)	(27	)%
Life insurance in-force before reinsurance		506,572			520,749		(14,177	)	(3	)%
Term universal life insurance
Net deposits	$	64		$	66	$	(2	)	(3	)%
Life insurance in-force, net of reinsurance		124,265			127,508		(3,243	)	(3	)%
Life insurance in-force before reinsurance		125,189			128,498		(3,309	)	(3	)%
Universal life insurance
Net deposits	$	111		$	141	$	(30	)	(21	)%
Sales:
Universal life insurance		2			4		(2	)	(50	)%
Linked-benefits		2			4		(2	)	(50	)%
Life insurance in-force, net of reinsurance		39,888			41,576		(1,688	)	(4	)%
Life insurance in-force before reinsurance		45,945			48,133		(2,188	)	(5	)%
Total life insurance
Net earned premiums and deposits	$	(10	)	$	386	$	(396	)	(103	)%
Sales:
Term life insurance		5			9		(4	)	(44	)%
Universal life insurance		2			4		(2	)	(50	)%
Linked-benefits		2			4		(2	)	(50	)%
Life insurance in-force, net of reinsurance		393,111			484,562		(91,451	)	(19	)%
Life insurance in-force before reinsurance		677,706			697,380		(19,674	)	(3	)%

⁽¹⁾	We define “NM” as not meaningful for increases or decreases greater than 200%.

Term and whole life insurance

Net earned premiums and our life insurance in-force, net of reinsurance, decreased primarily related to higher ceded reinsurance in the current year. We initially ceded $326 million of certain term life insurance premiums under a new reinsurance treaty as part of a life block transaction. Sales of our term life insurance product decreased predominantly related to certain distributor suspensions driven by recent rating agency actions and from our decision to suspend sales of our traditional life insurance products on March 7, 2016.

Term universal life insurance

We no longer solicit sales of term universal life insurance products; however, we continue to service our existing block of business.

Universal life insurance

Net deposits decreased primarily related to changes in our competitive positioning in the marketplace, distributor suspensions following recent adverse rating actions and our decision to suspend sales of our traditional life insurance products on March 7, 2016. Our life insurance in-force decreased primarily from higher lapses of older issued policies and lower deposits in the current year.

124

Fixed annuities

The following table sets forth selected operating performance measures regarding our fixed annuities as of or for the dates indicated:


	As of or for the three months ended March 31,
(Amounts in millions)	2016			2015
Single Premium Deferred Annuities
Account value, beginning of period	$	12,480		$	12,437
Deposits		162			310
Surrenders, benefits and product charges		(314	)		(352	)

Net flows		(152	)		(42	)
Interest credited and investment performance		69			82

Account value, end of period	$	12,397		$	12,477

Single Premium Immediate Annuities
Account value, beginning of period	$	5,180		$	5,763
Premiums and deposits		26			40
Surrenders, benefits and product charges		(193	)		(211	)

Net flows		(167	)		(171	)
Interest credited		59			64
Effect of accumulated net unrealized investment gains (losses)		91			69

Account value, end of period	$	5,163		$	5,725

Structured Settlements
Account value, net of reinsurance, beginning of period	$	1,066		$	1,078
Surrenders, benefits and product charges		(15	)		(15	)

Net flows		(15	)		(15	)
Interest credited		14			14

Account value, net of reinsurance, end of period	$	1,065		$	1,077

Total premiums from fixed annuities	$	3		$	10

Total deposits from fixed annuities	$	185		$	340

Single Premium Deferred Annuities

Account value of our single premium deferred annuities decreased as surrenders and benefits outpaced deposits and interest credited. Sales decreased primarily related to suspension of our products by distributors driven by the rating actions and from our decision to suspend sales of our traditional fixed annuity products on March 7, 2016.

Single Premium Immediate Annuities

Account value of our single premium immediate annuities decreased as benefits exceeded net unrealized investment gains, interest credited and premiums and deposits. Sales declined primarily related to suspension of our products by distributors driven by the rating actions and from our decision to suspend sales of our traditional fixed annuity products on March 7, 2016.

Structured Settlements

We no longer solicit sales of structured settlements; however, we continue to service our existing block of business.

125

Valuation systems and processes

Our U.S. Life Insurance segment will continue to migrate to a new valuation and projection platform for certain lines of business, while we upgrade platforms for other lines of business. For example, we are migrating to a new modeling system in our long-term care insurance business in 2016 or later. The migration and upgrades are part of our ongoing efforts to improve the infrastructure and capabilities of our information systems and our routine assessment and refinement of financial, actuarial, investment and risk management capabilities enterprise wide. These efforts will also provide our U.S. Life Insurance segment with improved platforms to support emerging accounting guidance and ongoing changes in capital regulations. Concurrently, valuation processes and methodologies will be reviewed, and may result in additional refinements to assumptions. Any material changes in balances, margins or income trends that may result from these activities will be disclosed accordingly.

Runoff segment

Trends and conditions

Results of our Runoff segment are affected primarily by investment performance, interest rate levels, net interest spreads, equity market conditions, mortality, policyholder loan activity, policyholder surrenders and scheduled maturities. In addition, the results of our Runoff segment can significantly impact our operating performance, regulatory capital requirements, distributable earnings and liquidity.

We discontinued sales of our individual and group variable annuities in 2011; however, we continue to service our existing blocks of variable annuity business and accept additional deposits on existing contracts. Equity market volatility has caused fluctuations in the results of our variable annuity products and regulatory capital requirements. In the future, equity and interest rate market performance and volatility could result in additional gains or losses in our variable annuity products although associated hedging activities are expected to partially mitigate these impacts. Volatility in the results of our variable annuity products can result in favorable or unfavorable impacts on earnings and statutory capital. In addition to the use of hedging activities to help mitigate impacts related to equity market volatility and interest rate risks, in the future, we may consider reinsurance opportunities to further mitigate volatility in results and manage capital.

The results of our institutional products are impacted by scheduled maturities of the liabilities, credit and interest income performance on assets, as well as liquidity levels. However, we believe our liquidity planning and our asset-liability management will mitigate this risk. While we do not actively sell institutional products, we may periodically issue funding agreements for asset-liability matching purposes.

Several factors may impact the time period for these products to runoff including the specific policy types, economic conditions and management strategies.

126

Segment results of operations

Three Months Ended March 31, 2016 Compared to Three Months Ended March 31, 2015

The following table sets forth the results of operations relating to our Runoff segment for the periods indicated:


	Three months ended March 31,						Increase (decrease) and percentage change
(Amounts in millions)	2016			2015			2016 vs. 2015
Revenues:
Net investment income	$	35		$	31		$	4		13	%
Net investment gains (losses)		(8	)		(6	)		(2	)	(33	)%
Policy fees and other income		42			49			(7	)	(14	)%

Total revenues		69			74			(5	)	(7	)%

Benefits and expenses:
Benefits and other changes in policy reserves		15			7			8		114	%
Interest credited		33			30			3		10	%
Acquisition and operating expenses, net of deferrals		16			19			(3	)	(16	)%
Amortization of deferred acquisition costs and intangibles		6			5			1		20	%

Total benefits and expenses		70			61			9		15	%

Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes		(1	)		13			(14	)	(108	)%
Provision (benefit) for income taxes		(2	)		3			(5	)	(167	)%

Income from continuing operations		1			10			(9	)	(90	)%
Adjustment to income from continuing operations:
Net investment (gains) losses, net		3			1			2		200	%

Net operating income	$	4		$	11		$	(7	)	(64	)%

Net operating income

Net operating income decreased primarily driven by lower account values and less favorable equity market performance in our variable annuity products and unfavorable mortality in our corporate-owned life insurance products in the current year.

Revenues

Net investment income increased $4 million driven by increase in policy loan income in our corporate-owned life insurance products and higher gains from limited partnerships in the current year.

Policy fees and other income decreased mainly attributable to lower account values in our variable annuity products in the current year.

Benefits and expenses

Benefits and other changes in policy reserves increased primarily attributable to our variable annuity products from an increase in our GMDB reserves due to less favorable equity market performance and unfavorable mortality in our corporate-owned life insurance products in the current year.

Interest credited increased largely related to higher loan cash values in our corporate-owned life insurance products in the current year.

127

Acquisition and operating expenses, net of deferrals, decreased largely related to lower commissions as a result of the runoff of our variable annuity products in the current year.

Provision (benefit) for income taxes. The effective tax rate increased to 151.6% for the three months ended March 31, 2016 from 26.0% for the three months ended March 31, 2015. The increase in the effective tax rate is primarily attributable to changes in tax favored investment benefits in relation to pre-tax results in the prior year.

Runoff selected operating performance measures

Variable annuity and variable life insurance products

The following table sets forth selected operating performance measures regarding our variable annuity and variable life insurance products as of or for the dates indicated:


	As of or for the three months ended March 31,
(Amounts in millions)	2016			2015
Variable Annuities—Income Distribution Series ⁽¹⁾
Account value, beginning of period	$	4,942		$	5,666
Deposits		6			9
Surrenders, benefits and product charges		(139	)		(190	)

Net flows		(133	)		(181	)
Interest credited and investment performance		79			110

Account value, end of period	$	4,888		$	5,595

Traditional Variable Annuities
Account value, net of reinsurance, beginning of period	$	1,241		$	1,455
Deposits		1			2
Surrenders, benefits and product charges		(53	)		(75	)

Net flows		(52	)		(73	)
Interest credited and investment performance		11			40

Account value, net of reinsurance, end of period	$	1,200		$	1,422

Variable Life Insurance
Account value, beginning of period	$	291		$	313
Deposits		2			2
Surrenders, benefits and product charges		(10	)		(8	)

Net flows		(8	)		(6	)
Interest credited and investment performance		—			9

Account value, end of period	$	283		$	316

⁽¹⁾

The Income Distribution Series products are comprised of our deferred and immediate variable annuity products, including those variable annuity products with rider options that provide guaranteed income benefits, including guaranteed minimum withdrawal benefits (“GMWBs”) and certain types of guaranteed annuitization benefits. These products do not include fixed single premium immediate annuities or deferred annuities, which may also serve income distribution needs.

Variable Annuities—Income Distribution Series

Account value related to our Income Distribution Series products decreased primarily related to surrenders outpacing less favorable equity market performance. We no longer solicit sales of our variable annuities; however, we continue to service our existing block of business and accept additional deposits on existing contracts.

128

Traditional Variable Annuities

In our traditional variable annuities, the decrease in account value was primarily the result of surrenders outpacing less favorable equity market performance. We no longer solicit sales of our variable annuities; however, we continue to service our existing block of business and accept additional deposits on existing contracts.

Variable Life Insurance

We no longer solicit sales of variable life insurance; however, we continue to service our existing block of business.

Institutional products

The following table sets forth selected operating performance measures regarding our institutional products as of or for the dates indicated:


	As of or for the three months ended March 31,
(Amounts in millions)	2016			2015
GICs, FABNs and Funding Agreements
Account value, beginning of period	$	410		$	493
Deposits		150			—
Surrenders and benefits		(1	)		(3	)

Net flows		149			(3	)
Interest credited		2			1

Account value, end of period	$	561		$	491

Account value related to our institutional products increased mainly attributable to higher deposits as a result of issuing funding agreements for asset-liability management and yield enhancement in the current year.

129

Corporate and Other Activities

Results of operations

Three Months Ended March 31, 2016 Compared to Three Months Ended March 31, 2015

The following table sets forth the results of operations relating to Corporate and Other activities for the periods indicated:


	Three months ended March 31,						Increase (decrease) and percentage change
(Amounts in millions)	2016			2015			2016 vs. 2015
Revenues:
Premiums	$	6		$	7		$	(1	)	(14	)%
Net investment income		2			(6	)		8		133	%
Net investment gains (losses)		(14	)		11			(25	)	NM	⁽¹⁾
Policy fees and other income		1			—			1		NM	⁽¹⁾

Total revenues		(5	)		12			(17	)	(142	)%

Benefits and expenses:
Benefits and other changes in policy reserves		2			5			(3	)	(60	)%
Acquisition and operating expenses, net of deferrals		137			14			123		NM	⁽¹⁾
Amortization of deferred acquisition costs and intangibles		—			1			(1	)	(100	)%
Interest expense		70			75			(5	)	(7	)%

Total benefits and expenses		209			95			114		120	%

Loss from continuing operations before income taxes		(214	)		(83	)		(131	)	(158	)%
Benefit for income taxes		(96	)		(30	)		(66	)	NM	⁽¹⁾

Loss from continuing operations		(118	)		(53	)		(65	)	(123	)%
Adjustments to loss from continuing operations:
Net investment (gains) losses, net		10			(7	)		17		NM	⁽¹⁾
(Gains) losses on sale of businesses, net		(20	)		—			(20	)	NM	⁽¹⁾
(Gains) losses on early extinguishment of debt, net		11			—			11		NM	⁽¹⁾
Fees associated with bond consent solicitation, net		12			—			12		NM	⁽¹⁾

Net operating loss	$	(105	)	$	(60	)	$	(45	)	(75	)%

⁽¹⁾	We define “NM” as not meaningful for increases or decreases greater than 200%.

Net operating loss

The net operating loss increased as a result of additional legal fees and expenses of $54 million, partially offset by higher tax benefits and net investment income in the current year.

Revenues

Net investment income increased related to the elimination of affiliate preferred stock dividends of approximately $8 million in the prior year that did not recur.

Net investment losses in the current year were driven by derivative losses and impairments, partially offset by net realized gains on the sale of investment securities. Net investment gains in the prior year resulted from derivative gains and net realized gains on the sale of investment securities.

130

Benefits and expenses

Benefits and other changes in policy reserves decreased primarily related to our European mortgage insurance business driven by lower new delinquencies and improved aging on our existing delinquencies.

Acquisition and operating expenses, net of deferrals, increased mainly driven by $69 million for the planned settlement of In re Genworth Financial, Inc. Securities Litigation and an additional $10 million of legal fees and expenses related to this litigation. In addition, we paid a make-whole expense of $20 million on the early redemption of Genworth Holdings’ 2016 senior notes in January 2016 and paid broker, advisor and investment banking fees of $18 million associated with Genworth Holdings’ bond consent solicitation in March 2016. The increase was also attributable to an additional estimated loss of $7 million recorded in the first quarter of 2016 related to the planned sale of our mortgage insurance business in Europe and $4 million of additional legal fees in the current year related to other pending litigation. We also had higher net expenses after allocations to our operating segments in the current year.

Interest expense decreased largely driven by the redemption of $298 million of Genworth Holdings’ senior notes in January 2016.

The increase in the income tax benefit in the current year was primarily related to the reversal of a deferred tax valuation allowance related to our mortgage insurance business in Europe. This increase was partially offset by stock-based compensation and taxes on foreign income in the current year.

Investments and Derivative Instruments

Trends and conditions

Investments—credit and investment markets

U.S. Treasury yields declined sharply in the first quarter of 2016 as slower economic growth in various global economies, foreign exchange rates and negative interest rates across much of Europe and Japan drove investors to U.S. markets. Growth concerns led to further monetary stimulus from global central banks and the U.S. Federal Reserve, which put pressure on interest rates.

Oil and metals prices declined to new lows earlier in the first quarter of 2016 before ending the quarter modestly higher in March 2016. Credit spreads, excluding the energy and metals sectors, closed the first quarter of 2016 relatively unchanged from year end levels; however, commodity exposed credits experienced extreme volatility. By the end of the first quarter of 2016, securities in the energy and metals sectors improved to outperform on the quarter, despite widespread ratings downgrades.

As of March 31, 2016, our fixed maturities securities portfolio, which was 96% investment grade, comprises 79% of our total investment portfolio. Our $3.6 billion energy portfolio was predominantly investment grade and our metals and mining sector holdings were less than 1% of our total investment portfolio as March 31, 2016. While we may see prolonged weakness in oil and other commodity prices that could continue to pressure ratings in those sectors, we believe our energy portfolio is well-diversified and would expect manageable capital impact on our U.S. life insurance subsidiaries.

Derivatives

We actively responded to the risk to our derivatives portfolio arising from our counterparties’ right to terminate their bilateral over-the-counter (“OTC”) derivatives transactions with us following the downgrades of Genworth Holdings and our life insurance subsidiaries by Standard & Poor’s Financial Services, LLC and Moody’s Investors Services Inc. in February 2016. We negotiated with our counterparties to determine whether they would exercise their rights to terminate the transactions, agree to maintain the transactions with us under revised terms or permit us to move the transactions to clearing through the Chicago Mercantile Exchange

131

(“CME”). No counterparties terminated any of the existing transactions based on the downgrades. We were able to maintain $3.0 billion in bilateral OTC derivatives transactions subject to providing initial margin in an aggregate amount of $209 million. We moved $5.8 billion of bilateral OTC transactions to clearing through the CME.

As a result of the credit rating downgrades in February 2016, the then current ratings of Genworth Holdings and our life insurance subsidiaries reached levels where our counterparties could terminate the transactions under our master swap agreements. However, as of March 31, 2016, we have successfully maintained all of these agreements either on a bilateral or a cleared basis. As of March 31, 2016, $13.6 billion notional of our derivatives portfolio under our master swap agreements was cleared through the CME. The customer swap agreements that govern our cleared derivatives contain provisions that enable our clearing agents to request initial margin in excess of CME requirements. As of March 31, 2016, we posted initial margin of $308 million to our clearing agents, which represented approximately $49 million more than was otherwise required by the clearinghouse. Because our clearing agents serve as guarantors of our obligations to the CME, the customer agreements contain broad termination provisions that are not specifically dependent on ratings. As of March 31, 2016, $4.5 billion notional of our derivatives portfolio was traded under OTC derivatives agreements pursuant to which we have posted aggregate independent amounts of $209 million and are holding collateral from counterparties in the amount of $95 million. We have $1.5 billion in bilateral OTC derivatives where the counterparty has the right to terminate its transactions with us based on our current ratings. Given our current ratings, our ability to enter into new derivatives transactions will be more limited.

Investment results

The following table sets forth information about our investment income, excluding net investment gains (losses), for each component of our investment portfolio for the periods indicated:


	Three months ended March 31,												Increase (decrease)
(Amounts in millions)	2016						2015						2016 vs. 2015
	Yield			Amount			Yield			Amount			Yield			Amount
Fixed maturity securities—taxable		4.7	%	$	641			4.6	%	$	632			0.1	%	$	9
Fixed maturity securities—non-taxable		3.6	%		3			3.5	%		3			0.1	%		—
Commercial mortgage loans		5.2	%		81			5.6	%		85			(0.4	)%		(4	)
Restricted commercial mortgage loans related tosecuritization entities		5.1	%		2			8.2	%		4			(3.1	)%		(2	)
Equity securities		5.1	%		5			6.1	%		4			(1.0	)%		1
Other invested assets		24.6	%		38			35.4	%		40			(10.8	)%		(2	)
Restricted other invested assets related tosecuritization entities		2.0	%		2			1.0	%		1			1.0	%		1
Policy loans		8.9	%		35			8.8	%		33			0.1	%		2
Cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments		0.4	%		5			0.2	%		3			0.2	%		2

Gross investment income before expenses and fees		4.6	%		812			4.6	%		805			—	%		7
Expenses and fees		(0.1	)%		(23	)		(0.1	)%		(24	)		—	%		1

Net investment income		4.5	%	$	789			4.5	%	$	781			—	%	$	8

Average invested assets and cash				$	69,851					$	69,743					$	108

Yields are based on net investment income as reported under U.S. GAAP and are consistent with how we measure our investment performance for management purposes. Yields are annualized, for interim periods, and are calculated as net investment income as a percentage of average quarterly asset carrying values except for fixed maturity and equity securities, derivatives and derivative counterparty collateral, which exclude unrealized fair value adjustments, and securities lending activity, which is included in other invested assets and is calculated net of the corresponding securities lending liability.

132

For the three months ended March 31, 2016, annualized weighted-average investment yields remained constant primarily attributable to $10 million higher favorable prepayment speed adjustment on structured securities and higher average invested assets, partially offset by lower gains of $3 million related to bond calls and mortgage prepayments in the current year. The three months ended March 31, 2016 included a decrease of $8 million attributable to changes in foreign exchange rates.

The following table sets forth net investment gains (losses) for the periods indicated:


	Three months ended March 31,
(Amounts in millions)	2016			2015
Available-for-sale securities:
Realized gains	$	16		$	15
Realized losses		(23	)		(12	)

Net realized gains (losses) on available-for-sale securities		(7	)		3

Impairments:
Total other-than-temporary impairments		(11	)		(3	)
Portion of other-than-temporary impairments recognized in other comprehensive income (loss)		—			—

Net other-than-temporary impairments		(11	)		(3	)

Trading securities		28			6
Commercial mortgage loans		1			2
Net gains (losses) related to securitization entities		8			8
Derivative instruments		(38	)		(32	)

Net investment gains (losses)	$	(19	)	$	(16	)

Three Months Ended March 31, 2016 Compared to Three Months Ended March 31, 2015

•

We recorded $8 million of higher net other-than-temporary impairments during the three months ended March 31, 2016. Of total impairments of $11 million recorded during the three months ended March 31, 2016, $8 million related to corporate securities and $3 million related to limited partnerships. Impairments of $3 million during the three months ended March 31, 2015 related to commercial mortgage loans.

•

Net investment losses related to derivatives of $38 million during the three months ended March 31, 2016 were primarily associated with hedging programs for our runoff variable annuity products, including decreases in the values of instruments used to protect statutory surplus from equity market fluctuation. We also had losses associated with derivatives used to hedge foreign currency risk associated with expected dividend payments from certain foreign subsidiaries and with hedging programs for our fixed indexed annuity products. These losses were partially offset by gains in derivatives used to hedge foreign currency risk associated with assets held and gains related to hedge ineffectiveness from our cash flow hedge programs for our long-term care insurance business.

Net investment losses related to derivatives of $32 million during the three months ended March 31, 2015 were primarily associated with losses related to derivatives used to hedge foreign currency risk associated with assets held. In addition, there were GMWB losses, including decreases in the values of instruments used to protect statutory surplus from equity market fluctuation. These losses were partially offset by gains related to derivatives to hedge foreign currency risk associated with expected dividend payments from certain foreign subsidiaries.

•

We recorded net losses of $7 million related to the sale of available-for-sale securities during the three months ended March 31, 2016 compared to net gains of $3 million during the three months ended

133

March 31, 2015. We recorded $22 million of higher net gains related to trading securities during the three months ended March 31, 2016 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2015.

Investment portfolio

The following table sets forth our cash, cash equivalents and invested assets as of the dates indicated:


	March 31, 2016					December 31, 2015
(Amounts in millions)	Carrying value		% of total			Carrying value		% of total
Fixed maturity securities, available-for-sale:
Public	$	45,118		59	%	$	43,136		58	%
Private		15,172		20			15,061		20
Commercial mortgage loans		6,179		8			6,170		8
Other invested assets		2,923		4			2,309		3
Policy loans		1,565		2			1,568		2
Restricted other invested assets related to securitization entities		422		1			413		1
Equity securities, available-for-sale		431		1			310		—
Restricted commercial mortgage loans related to securitization entities		155		—			161		—
Cash and cash equivalents		4,043		5			5,965		8

Total cash, cash equivalents and invested assets	$	76,008		100	%	$	75,093		100	%

For a discussion of the change in cash, cash equivalents and invested assets, see the comparison for this line item under “—Consolidated Balance Sheets.” See note 4 in our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements under “Item 1—Financial Statements” for additional information related to our investment portfolio.

We hold fixed maturity, equity and trading securities, derivatives, embedded derivatives, securities held as collateral and certain other financial instruments, which are carried at fair value. Fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. As of March 31, 2016, approximately 9% of our investment holdings recorded at fair value was based on significant inputs that were not market observable and were classified as Level 3 measurements. See note 6 in our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements under “Item 1—Financial Statements” for additional information related to fair value.

134

Fixed maturity and equity securities

As of March 31, 2016, the amortized cost or cost, gross unrealized gains (losses) and fair value of our fixed maturity and equity securities classified as available-for-sale were as follows:


			Gross unrealized gains				Gross unrealized losses
(Amounts in millions)	Amortized cost or cost		Not other-than- temporarily impaired		Other-than- temporarily impaired		Not other-than- temporarily impaired			Other-than- temporarily impaired			Fair value
Fixed maturity securities:
U.S. government, agencies andgovernment-sponsored enterprises	$	5,389	$	1,135	$	—	$	—		$	—		$	6,524
State and political subdivisions		2,272		262		—		(17	)		—			2,517
Non-U.S. government ⁽¹⁾		1,944		138		—		(2	)		—			2,080
U.S. corporate:
Utilities		3,752		530		—		(13	)		—			4,269
Energy		2,193		85		—		(114	)		—			2,164
Finance and insurance		5,357		476		10		(28	)		—			5,815
Consumer—non-cyclical		3,838		522		—		(6	)		—			4,354
Technology and communications		2,147		175		—		(22	)		—			2,300
Industrial		1,165		82		—		(22	)		—			1,225
Capital goods		1,801		254		—		(5	)		—			2,050
Consumer—cyclical		1,568		135		—		(11	)		—			1,692
Transportation		1,035		105		—		(8	)		—			1,132
Other		362		29		—		(3	)		—			388

Total U.S. corporate ⁽¹⁾		23,218		2,393		10		(232	)		—			25,389

Non-U.S. corporate:
Utilities		1,038		56		—		(10	)		—			1,084
Energy		1,459		48		—		(70	)		—			1,437
Finance and insurance		2,471		154		—		(6	)		—			2,619
Consumer—non-cyclical		735		36		—		(5	)		—			766
Technology and communications		994		59		—		(14	)		—			1,039
Industrial		1,047		32		—		(45	)		—			1,034
Capital goods		594		31		—		(15	)		—			610
Consumer—cyclical		538		10		—		(4	)		—			544
Transportation		561		62		—		(3	)		—			620
Other		2,669		224		—		(17	)		—			2,876

Total non-U.S. corporate⁽¹⁾		12,106		712		—		(189	)		—			12,629

Residential mortgage-backed⁽²⁾		4,716		403		9		(6	)		—			5,122
Commercial mortgage-backed		2,588		133		3		(10	)		(1	)		2,713
Other asset-backed ⁽²⁾		3,381		12		1		(78	)		—			3,316

Total fixed maturity securities		55,614		5,188		23		(534	)		(1	)		60,290
Equity securities		461		12		—		(42	)		—			431

Total available-for-salesecurities	$	56,075	$	5,200	$	23	$	(576	)	$	(1	)	$	60,721

⁽¹⁾	Fair value included European periphery exposure of $395 million in Ireland, $251 million in Spain, $105 million in Italy and $16 million in Portugal.

⁽²⁾	Fair value included $49 million collateralized by Alt-A residential mortgage loans and $31 million collateralized by sub-prime residential mortgage loans.

135

As of December 31, 2015, the amortized cost or cost, gross unrealized gains (losses) and fair value of our fixed maturity and equity securities classified as available-for-sale were as follows:


			Gross unrealized gains				Gross unrealized losses
(Amounts in millions)	Amortized cost or cost		Not other-than- temporarily impaired		Other-than- temporarily impaired		Not other-than- temporarily impaired			Other-than- temporarily impaired		Fair value
Fixed maturity securities:
U.S. government, agencies and government-sponsored enterprises	$	5,487	$	732	$	—	$	(16	)	$	—	$	6,203
State and political subdivisions		2,287		181		—		(30	)		—		2,438
Non-U.S. government ⁽¹⁾		1,910		110		—		(5	)		—		2,015
U.S. corporate:
Utilities		3,355		364		—		(26	)		—		3,693
Energy		2,560		103		—		(162	)		—		2,501
Finance and insurance		5,268		392		15		(43	)		—		5,632
Consumer—non-cyclical		3,755		371		—		(30	)		—		4,096
Technology and communications		2,108		123		—		(38	)		—		2,193
Industrial		1,164		53		—		(44	)		—		1,173
Capital goods		1,774		188		—		(12	)		—		1,950
Consumer—cyclical		1,602		95		—		(22	)		—		1,675
Transportation		1,023		75		—		(12	)		—		1,086
Other		385		22		—		(5	)		—		402

Total U.S. corporate ⁽¹⁾		22,994		1,786		15		(394	)		—		24,401

Non-U.S. corporate:
Utilities		815		37		—		(9	)		—		843
Energy		1,700		64		—		(78	)		—		1,686
Finance and insurance		2,327		152		2		(8	)		—		2,473
Consumer—non-cyclical		746		24		—		(18	)		—		752
Technology and communications		978		36		—		(26	)		—		988
Industrial		1,063		19		—		(96	)		—		986
Capital goods		602		19		—		(17	)		—		604
Consumer—cyclical		522		8		—		(4	)		—		526
Transportation		559		52		—		(6	)		—		605
Other		2,574		187		—		(25	)		—		2,736

Total non-U.S. corporate ⁽¹⁾		11,886		598		2		(287	)		—		12,199

Residential mortgage-backed ⁽²⁾		4,777		330		11		(17	)		—		5,101
Commercial mortgage-backed		2,492		84		3		(20	)		—		2,559
Other asset-backed ⁽²⁾		3,328		11		1		(59	)		—		3,281

Total fixed maturity securities		55,161		3,832		32		(828	)		—		58,197
Equity securities		325		8		—		(23	)		—		310

Total available-for-salesecurities	$	55,486	$	3,840	$	32	$	(851	)	$	—	$	58,507

⁽¹⁾	Fair value included European periphery exposure of $361 million in Ireland, $244 million in Spain, $103 million in Italy and $15 million in Portugal.

⁽²⁾	Fair value included $69 million collateralized by Alt-A residential mortgage loans and $32 million collateralized by sub-prime residential mortgage loans.

136

Fixed maturity securities increased $2.1 billion principally from higher net unrealized gains attributable to changes in interest rates as well as changes in foreign exchange rates from the weakening of the U.S. dollar in the current year.

Our exposure in peripheral European countries consists of fixed maturity securities in Portugal, Ireland, Italy and Spain. Investments in these countries are primarily made to support our international businesses and to diversify our U.S. corporate fixed maturity securities with European bonds denominated in U.S. dollars. During the three months ended March 31, 2016, our exposure to the peripheral European countries increased by $44 million to $767 million with unrealized gains of $44 million. Our exposure as of March 31, 2016 was diversified with direct exposure to local economies of $168 million, indirect exposure through debt issued by subsidiaries outside of the European periphery of $100 million and exposure to multinational companies where the majority of revenues come from outside of the country of domicile of $499 million.

Commercial mortgage loans

The following tables set forth additional information regarding our commercial mortgage loans as of the dates indicated:


	March 31, 2016
(Dollar amounts in millions)	Total recorded investment		Number of loans		Loan-to-value ⁽¹⁾			Delinquent principal balance		Number of delinquent loans
Loan Year
2005 and prior	$	1,116		485		40	%	$	—		—
2006		652		156		50	%		—		—
2007		521		141		58	%		15		1
2008		141		26		56	%		6		1
2009		—		—		—	%		—		—
2010		92		17		48	%		—		—
2011		224		48		49	%		—		—
2012		615		91		54	%		—		—
2013		803		137		58	%		—		—
2014		910		147		65	%		—		—
2015		948		143		67	%		—		—
2016		174		20		67	%		—		—

Total	$	6,196		1,411		56	%	$	21		2

⁽¹⁾	Represents weighted-average loan-to-value as of March 31, 2016.


	December 31, 2015
(Dollar amounts in millions)	Total recorded investment		Number of loans		Loan-to-value ⁽¹⁾			Delinquent principal balance		Number of delinquent loans
Loan Year
2004 and prior	$	609		361		32	%	$	—		—
2005		542		146		49	%		5		1
2006		709		177		51	%		1		1
2007		540		146		59	%		6		1
2008		145		27		56	%		—		—
2009		—		—		—	%		—		—
2010		93		17		48	%		—		—
2011		226		48		49	%		—		—
2012		626		92		55	%		—		—
2013		822		138		58	%		—		—
2014		935		150		66	%		—		—
2015		940		142		67	%		—		—

Total	$	6,187		1,444		56	%	$	12		3

⁽¹⁾	Represents weighted-average loan-to-value as of December 31, 2015.

137

Other invested assets

The following table sets forth the carrying values of our other invested assets as of the dates indicated:


	March 31, 2016					December 31, 2015
(Amounts in millions)	Carrying value		% of total			Carrying value		% of total
Derivatives	$	1,667		57	%	$	1,112		48	%
Trading securities		471		16			447		19
Securities lending collateral		415		14			347		15
Limited partnerships		177		6			188		8
Short-term investments		174		6			197		9
Other investments		19		1			18		1

Total other invested assets	$	2,923		100	%	$	2,309		100	%

Derivatives increased primarily attributable to changes in the long-term interest rate environment in the current year. Securities lending collateral also increased driven by market demand.

Derivatives

The activity associated with derivative instruments can generally be measured by the change in notional value over the periods presented. However, for GMWB and fixed index annuity embedded derivatives, the change between periods is best illustrated by the number of policies. The following tables represent activity associated with derivative instruments as of the dates indicated:


(Notional in millions)	Measurement		December 31, 2015		Additions		Maturities/ terminations			March 31, 2016
Derivatives designated as hedges
Cash flow hedges:
Interest rate swaps		Notional	$	11,214	$	—	$	(18	)	$	11,196
Inflation indexed swaps		Notional		571		1		(2	)		570
Foreign currency swaps		Notional		35		—		—			35

Total cash flow hedges				11,820		1		(20	)		11,801

Total derivatives designated as hedges				11,820		1		(20	)		11,801

Derivatives not designated as hedges
Interest rate swaps		Notional		4,932		—		(250	)		4,682
Interest rate swaps related to securitization entities		Notional		67		—		(2	)		65
Foreign currency swaps		Notional		162		17		—			179
Credit default swaps		Notional		144		—		—			144
Credit default swaps related to securitization entities		Notional		312		—		—			312
Equity index options		Notional		1,080		722		(270	)		1,532
Financial futures		Notional		1,331		2,361		(2,187	)		1,505
Equity return swaps		Notional		134		50		(38	)		146
Other foreign currency contracts		Notional		1,656		567		(128	)		2,095

Total derivatives not designated as hedges				9,818		3,717		(2,875	)		10,660

Total derivatives			$	21,638	$	3,718	$	(2,895	)	$	22,461

138


(Number of policies)	Measurement	December 31, 2015		Additions		Maturities/ terminations			March 31, 2016
Derivatives not designated as hedges
GMWB embedded derivatives	Policies		36,146		—		(717	)		35,429
Fixed index annuity embedded derivatives	Policies		17,482		623		(132	)		17,973
Indexed universal life embedded derivatives	Policies		982		131		(12	)		1,101

The $0.8 billion increase in the notional value of derivatives was primarily attributable to a notional increase in our non-qualified equity options related to our hedging strategy associated with fixed index annuity insurance products.

The number of policies related to our GMWB embedded derivatives decreased as variable annuity products are no longer being offered. The number of policies related to our fixed index annuity and indexed universal life embedded derivatives increased as a result of product sales in the current year.

Consolidated Balance Sheets

Total assets. Total assets increased $742 million from $106,431 million as of December 31, 2015 to $107,173 million as of March 31, 2016.

•

Cash, cash equivalents and invested assets increased $915 million primarily from an increase of $2,837 million in invested assets, partially offset by a decrease of $1,922 million in cash and cash equivalents. Our fixed maturity securities increased $2,093 million principally from higher net unrealized investment gains attributable to changes in interest rates as well as from changes in foreign exchange rates from the weakening of the U.S. dollar in the current year. Other invested assets increased $614 million mainly from an increase in derivatives driven by the changes in the long-term interest rate environment in the current year. Cash and cash equivalents decreased primarily from the redemption of non-recourse funding obligations and long-term borrowings in the current year.

•

Deferred acquisition costs decreased $163 million primarily related to higher net unrealized investment gains in the current year.

•

Reinsurance recoverable increased $342 million mainly attributable to a new reinsurance agreement with Protective Life to coinsure certain of our term life insurance policies as part of a life block transaction completed in January 2016. As part of this transaction, we recorded a deferred gain of approximately $67 million in the current year.

•

Deferred tax asset decreased $155 million as a result of an increase in the liabilities related to net unrealized investment gains in the current year.

•

Separate account assets decreased $259 million mainly driven by surrenders and benefits in the current year.

Total liabilities. Total liabilities decreased $594 million from $91,794 million as of December 31, 2015 to $91,200 million as of March 31, 2016.

•

Future policy benefits increased $301 million primarily driven by an increase in our long-term care insurance business largely from the aging and growth of the in-force block in the current year.

•

Other liabilities increased $592 million primarily driven by higher derivative collateral as a result of changes in the long-term interest rate environment in the current year. This increase was partially offset by a decrease of $200 million related to our repurchase program in the current year.

•

Non-recourse funding obligations decreased $1,610 million as a result of early redemptions of non-recourse funding obligations for River Lake and River Lake II related to a life block transaction completed in the current year.

139

•

Long-term borrowings decreased $338 million attributable to the redemption of $298 million of Genworth Holdings’ 2016 senior notes in January 2016 and the repurchase of $28 million principal of Genworth Holdings’ senior notes with various maturity dates during the three months ended March 31, 2016. The decrease was also related to $43 million of bond consent fees paid as part of Genworth Holdings’ bond consent solicitation. These decreases were partially offset by an increase of $30 million from changes in foreign exchange rates on debt in Canada and Australia.

•

Deferred tax liability increased $425 million primarily from an increase in net unrealized investment gains and a decrease in deferred tax assets on net operating losses in the current year.

•

Separate account liabilities decreased $259 million mainly driven by surrenders and benefits in the current year.

Total equity. Total equity increased $1,336 million from $14,637 million as of December 31, 2015 to $15,973 million as of March 31, 2016.

•

We reported net income available to Genworth Financial, Inc.’s common stockholders of $53 million during the three months ended March 31, 2016.

•

Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) increased $1,175 million predominantly attributable to higher net unrealized investment gains of $803 million and derivatives qualifying as hedges of $257 million related to changes in the long-term interest rate environment in the current year. Foreign currency translation also increased $115 million related to the weakening of the U.S. dollar in the current year.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Liquidity and capital resources represent our overall financial strength and our ability to generate cash flows from our businesses, borrow funds at competitive rates and raise new capital to meet our operating and growth needs.

Genworth and subsidiaries

The following table sets forth our unaudited condensed consolidated cash flows for the three months ended March 31:


(Amounts in millions)	2016			2015
Net cash from operating activities	$	256		$	624
Net cash from investing activities		(255	)		(366	)
Net cash from financing activities		(1,941	)		35

Net increase (decrease) in cash before foreign exchange effect	$	(1,940	)	$	293

Our principal sources of cash include sales of our products and services, income from our investment portfolio and proceeds from sales of investments. As an insurance business, we typically generate positive cash flows from operating activities, as premiums collected from our insurance products and income received from our investments exceed policy acquisition costs, benefits paid, redemptions and operating expenses. Our cash flows from operating activities are affected by the timing of premiums, fees and investment income received and benefits and expenses paid. Positive cash flows from operating activities are then invested to support the obligations of our insurance and investment products and required capital supporting these products. In analyzing our cash flow, we focus on the change in the amount of cash available and used in investing activities. Changes in cash from financing activities primarily relate to the issuance of, and redemptions and benefit payments on, universal life insurance and investment contracts; the issuance and acquisition of debt and equity securities; the issuance and repayment or repurchase of borrowings and non-recourse funding obligations; and dividends to our stockholders and other capital transactions.

140

We had lower cash inflows from operating activities during the current year mainly attributable to amounts paid related to a new reinsurance agreement in our life insurance business. We also paid amounts related to the planned settlement of In re Genworth Financial, Inc. Securities Litigation and fees associated with Genworth Holdings’ bond consent solicitation. These increases were partially offset by higher net cash collateral received from counterparties primarily as a result of the change in the derivative positions in the current year.

We had lower cash outflows from investing activities during the current year primarily from net maturities and sales of short-term investments in the current year compared to net purchases in the prior year.

We had cash outflows from financing activities during the current year primarily from the redemption of $1,620 million of non-recourse funding obligations. Genworth Holdings also repaid and repurchased $326 million of its senior notes in the current year.

In the United States and Canada, we engage in certain securities lending transactions for the purpose of enhancing the yield on our investment securities portfolio. We maintain effective control over all loaned securities and, therefore, continue to report such securities as fixed maturity securities on the consolidated balance sheets. We are currently indemnified against counterparty credit risk by the intermediary. See note 7 in our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements under “Item 1—Financial Statements” for additional information related to our securities lending program.

We also have a repurchase program in which we sell an investment security at a specified price and agree to repurchase that security at another specified price at a later date. See note 7 in our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements under “Item 1—Financial Statements” for additional information related to our repurchase program.

Genworth—holding company

Genworth Financial and Genworth Holdings each acts as a holding company for their respective subsidiaries and do not have any significant operations of their own. Dividends from their respective subsidiaries, payments to them under tax sharing and expense reimbursement arrangements with their subsidiaries and proceeds from borrowings or securities issuances are their principal sources of cash to meet their obligations. Insurance laws and regulations regulate the payment of dividends and other distributions to Genworth Financial and Genworth Holdings by their insurance subsidiaries. We expect dividends paid by the insurance subsidiaries will vary depending on strategic objectives, regulatory requirements and business performance.

The primary uses of funds at Genworth Financial and Genworth Holdings include payment of holding company general operating expenses (including taxes), payment of principal, interest and other expenses on current and any future borrowings, payments under current and any future guarantees (including guarantees of certain subsidiary obligations), payment of amounts owed to GE under the Tax Matters Agreement, payments to subsidiaries (and, in the case of Genworth Holdings, to Genworth Financial) under tax sharing agreements, contributions to subsidiaries, repurchases of debt and equity securities and, in the case of Genworth Holdings, loans, dividends or other distributions to Genworth Financial. In deploying future capital, important current priorities include focusing on our operating businesses so they remain appropriately capitalized, and accelerating progress on reducing overall indebtedness of Genworth Holdings. We may from time to time seek to repurchase or redeem outstanding notes for cash (with cash on hand, proceeds from the issuance of new debt and/or the proceeds from asset or stock sales) in open market purchases, tender offers, privately negotiated transactions or otherwise. We currently seek to reduce our indebtedness over time through repurchases, redemptions and/or repayments at maturity.

Our Board of Directors has suspended the payment of stockholder dividends on our Genworth Financial common stock indefinitely. The declaration and payment of future dividends to holders of our common stock will be at the discretion of our Board of Directors and will be dependent on many factors including the receipt of

141

dividends from our operating subsidiaries, our financial condition and operating results, the capital requirements of our subsidiaries, legal requirements, regulatory constraints, our credit and financial strength ratings and such other factors as the Board of Directors deems relevant. In addition, our Board of Directors has suspended repurchases of our Genworth Financial common stock under our stock repurchase program indefinitely. The resumption of our stock repurchase program will be at the discretion of our Board of Directors.

Genworth Holdings had $760 million and $1,124 million of cash and cash equivalents as of March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively. As of March 31, 2016, cash and cash equivalents of Genworth Holdings included approximately $80 million of restricted cash. Genworth Holdings did not hold any U.S. government securities as of March 31, 2016 but held $250 million of these securities as of December 31, 2015.

During the three months ended March 31, 2016, we received common stock dividends from our international subsidiaries of $73 million.

The life block transaction completed in January 2016 is expected to generate approximately $175 million of tax benefits to the holding company that are scheduled to be settled in July 2016, which are committed to be used in executing the restructuring plan for our U.S. life insurance businesses.

Regulated insurance subsidiaries

The liquidity requirements of our regulated insurance subsidiaries principally relate to the liabilities associated with their various insurance and investment products, operating costs and expenses, the payment of dividends to their respective parent company, contributions to their subsidiaries, payment of principal and interest on their outstanding debt obligations and income taxes. Liabilities arising from insurance and investment products include the payment of benefits, as well as cash payments in connection with policy surrenders and withdrawals, policy loans and obligations to redeem funding agreements.

Our insurance subsidiaries have used cash flows from operations and investment activities to fund their liquidity requirements. Our insurance subsidiaries’ principal cash inflows from operating activities are derived from premiums, annuity deposits and insurance and investment product fees and other income, including commissions, cost of insurance, mortality, expense and surrender charges, contract underwriting fees, investment management fees and dividends and distributions from their subsidiaries. The principal cash inflows from investment activities result from repayments of principal, investment income and, as necessary, sales of invested assets.

Our insurance subsidiaries maintain investment strategies intended to provide adequate funds to pay benefits without forced sales of investments. Product liabilities with longer durations are generally matched with investments having similar duration such as long-term fixed maturity securities and commercial mortgage loans. Shorter-term product liabilities are matched with fixed maturity securities that have short- and medium-term fixed maturities. In addition, our insurance subsidiaries hold highly liquid, high quality short-term investment securities and other liquid investment grade fixed maturity securities to fund anticipated operating expenses, surrenders and withdrawals. As of March 31, 2016, our total cash, cash equivalents and invested assets were $76.0 billion. Our investments in privately placed fixed maturity securities, commercial mortgage loans, policy loans, limited partnership interests and select mortgage-backed and asset-backed securities are relatively illiquid and back relatively illiquid liabilities. These asset classes represented approximately 31% of the carrying value of our total cash, cash equivalents and invested assets as of March 31, 2016.

In April 2016, Genworth Canada announced acceptance by the Toronto Stock Exchange of its Notice of Intention to Make a Normal Course Issuer Bid (“NCIB”). Pursuant to the NCIB, Genworth Canada may, if considered advisable, purchase from time to time over the next 12 months, up to an aggregate of approximately 4.6 million of its issued and outstanding common shares. If Genworth Canada decides to repurchase shares through the NCIB, we intend to participate in the NCIB in order to maintain our overall ownership at its current level.

142

Capital resources and financing activities

In January 2016, Genworth Holdings redeemed $298 million of its 2016 Notes and paid a make-whole premium of approximately $20 million pre-tax in addition to accrued and unpaid interest.

During the three months ended March 31, 2016, in connection with a life block transaction, River Lake redeemed $975 million of its total outstanding floating rate subordinated notes due in 2033 and River Lake II redeemed $645 million of its total outstanding floating rate subordinated notes due in 2035 for a pre-tax loss of $9 million from the write-off of deferred borrowing costs.

We believe existing cash held at Genworth Holdings combined with dividends from operating subsidiaries, payments under tax sharing and expense reimbursement arrangements with subsidiaries, proceeds from borrowings or securities issuances and sales of assets will provide us with sufficient capital flexibility and liquidity to meet our projected future operating and financing requirements. We actively monitor our liquidity position, liquidity generation options and the credit markets given changing market conditions. We target liquidity at Genworth Holdings to maintain a minimum balance of one and one-half times expected annual debt interest payments plus an additional $350 million. As of March 31, 2016, Genworth Holdings was below this target by approximately $50 million as a result of our decision to use cash to repurchase debt, settle the In re Genworth Financial, Inc. Securities Litigation and complete the bond consent solicitation. We will continue to evaluate our target level of liquidity as circumstances warrant and may remain below the target for a period of time given these or future actions and due to the timing of cash inflows and outflows. Additionally, we will continue to evaluate market influences on the valuation of our senior debt, and may consider additional opportunities to repurchase our debt over time. We cannot predict with any certainty the impact to us from any future disruptions in the credit markets or the recent or any further downgrades by one or more of the rating agencies of the financial strength ratings of our insurance company subsidiaries and/or the credit ratings of our holding companies. The availability of additional funding will depend on a variety of factors such as market conditions, regulatory considerations, the general availability of credit, the overall availability of credit to the financial services industry, the level of activity and availability of reinsurance, our credit ratings and credit capacity and the performance of and outlook for our business. For a discussion of certain risks associated with our liquidity, see “Item 1A—Risk Factors—Our internal sources of liquidity may be insufficient to meet our needs and our access to capital may be limited or unavailable. Under such conditions, we may seek additional capital but may be unable to obtain it” in our 2015 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Contractual obligations and commercial commitments

Except as disclosed above, there have been no material additions or changes to our contractual obligations and commercial commitments as set forth in our 2015 Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on February 26, 2016.

Securitization Entities

There were no off-balance sheet securitization transactions during the three months ended March 31, 2016 or 2015.

143

New Accounting Standards

For a discussion of recently adopted accounting standards, see note 2 in our consolidated financial statements under “Item 1—Financial Statements.”

Item 3.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Market risk is the risk of the loss of fair value resulting from adverse changes in market rates and prices, such as interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates and equity prices. Market risk is directly influenced by the volatility and liquidity in the markets in which the related underlying financial instruments are traded. The following is a discussion of our market risk exposures and our risk management practices.

Credit spreads, excluding the energy and metals sectors, closed the first quarter of 2016 relatively unchanged from year end levels; however, commodity exposed credits experienced extreme volatility. In the first quarter of 2016, U.S. Treasury yields declined sharply remaining at historically low levels. See “—Business trends and conditions” and “—Investments and Derivative Instruments” in “Item 2—Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” for further discussion of recent market conditions.

In the first quarter of 2016, the U.S. dollar strengthened against currencies in Canada and the United Kingdom but weakened against currencies in Australia as well as the Euro compared to the first quarter of 2015. However, the U.S. dollar weakened against currencies in Canada, Australia and the United Kingdom as well as the Euro compared to the fourth quarter of 2015. The overall weakening of the U.S. dollar in the first quarter of 2016 generally resulted in higher levels of reported revenues and net income, assets, liabilities and accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) in our U.S. dollar consolidated financial statements. See “Item 2—Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” for further discussion on the impact of changes in foreign currency exchange rates.

Except as disclosed above, there were no other material changes in our market risks since December 31, 2015.

Item 4.

Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

As of March 31, 2016, an evaluation was conducted under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934). Based on this evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of March 31, 2016.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting During the Quarter Ended March 31, 2016

During the three months ended March 31, 2016, there have not been any changes in our internal control over financial reporting that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

144

PART II—OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.

Legal Proceedings

See note 10 in our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements under “Part 1—Item 1—Financial Statements” for a description of material pending litigation and regulatory matters affecting us.

Item 1A.

Risk Factors

The discussion of our business and operations should be read together with the risk factors contained in Item 1A of our 2015 Annual Report on Form 10-K, which describe various risks and uncertainties to which we are or may become subject. These risks and uncertainties have the potential to affect our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows, strategies or prospects in a material and adverse manner. There have been no material changes to the risk factors set forth in the above-referenced filings as of March 31, 2016.

Item 6.

Exhibits


Number		Description

4.1		Supplemental Indenture No. 12, dated as of March 18, 2016, among Genworth Holdings, Inc., Genworth Financial, Inc. and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as Trustee, amending the Indenture, dated as of June 15, 2004, between Genworth Financial, Inc. (renamed Genworth Holdings, Inc.) and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (succeeded by The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A.), as Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 22, 2016)

4.2		Third Supplemental Indenture, dated as of March 18, 2016, among Genworth Holdings, Inc., Genworth Financial, Inc. and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as Trustee, amending the Indenture, dated as of November 14, 2006, between Genworth Financial, Inc. (renamed Genworth Holdings, Inc.) and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 22, 2016)

10.1§		Form of Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement under the 2012 Genworth Financial, Inc. Omnibus Incentive Plan (filed herewith)

10.2§		Form of 2016-2018 Performance Stock Unit Award Agreement under the 2012 Genworth Financial, Inc. Omnibus Incentive Plan (filed herewith)

12		Statement of Ratio of Income to Fixed Charges (filed herewith)

31.1		Certification of Thomas J. McInerney (filed herewith)

31.2		Certification of Kelly L. Groh (filed herewith)

32.1		Certification Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code—Thomas J. McInerney (filed herewith)

32.2		Certification Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code—Kelly L. Groh (filed herewith)

101.INS		XBRL Instance Document

101.SCH		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document

101.CAL		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document

101.LAB		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document

101.PRE		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

101.DEF		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document

§	Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.

145

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

146