THE SOUTHERN COMPANY
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
þ QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2005
OR
o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR
15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from _____to_____
|
|
|
|
|
Commission |
|
Registrant, State of Incorporation, |
|
I.R.S. Employer |
File Number |
|
Address and Telephone Number |
|
Identification No. |
1-3526
|
|
The Southern Company
|
|
58-0690070 |
|
|
(A Delaware Corporation) |
|
|
|
|
270 Peachtree Street, N.W. |
|
|
|
|
Atlanta, Georgia 30303 |
|
|
|
|
(404) 506-5000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1-3164
|
|
Alabama Power Company
|
|
63-0004250 |
|
|
(An Alabama Corporation) |
|
|
|
|
600 North 18th Street |
|
|
|
|
Birmingham, Alabama 35291 |
|
|
|
|
(205) 257-1000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1-6468
|
|
Georgia Power Company
|
|
58-0257110 |
|
|
(A Georgia Corporation) |
|
|
|
|
241 Ralph McGill Boulevard, N.E. |
|
|
|
|
Atlanta, Georgia 30308 |
|
|
|
|
(404) 506-6526 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0-2429
|
|
Gulf Power Company
|
|
59-0276810 |
|
|
(A Maine Corporation) |
|
|
|
|
One Energy Place |
|
|
|
|
Pensacola, Florida 32520 |
|
|
|
|
(850) 444-6111 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
001-11229
|
|
Mississippi Power Company
|
|
64-0205820 |
|
|
(A Mississippi Corporation) |
|
|
|
|
2992 West Beach |
|
|
|
|
Gulfport, Mississippi 39501 |
|
|
|
|
(228) 864-1211 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1-5072
|
|
Savannah Electric and Power Company
|
|
58-0418070 |
|
|
(A Georgia Corporation) |
|
|
|
|
600 East Bay Street |
|
|
|
|
Savannah, Georgia 31401 |
|
|
|
|
(912) 644-7171 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
333-98553
|
|
Southern Power Company
|
|
58-2598670 |
|
|
(A Delaware Corporation) |
|
|
|
|
270 Peachtree Street, N.W. |
|
|
|
|
Atlanta, Georgia 30303 |
|
|
|
|
(404) 506-5000 |
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrants (1) have filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrants were required to file such reports), and (2) have been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes
þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Registrant |
|
Yes |
|
|
No |
|
The Southern Company |
|
|
x |
|
|
|
|
|
Alabama Power Company |
|
|
|
|
|
|
x |
|
Georgia Power Company |
|
|
|
|
|
|
x |
|
Gulf Power Company |
|
|
|
|
|
|
x |
|
Mississippi Power Company |
|
|
|
|
|
|
x |
|
Savannah Electric and Power Company |
|
|
|
|
|
|
x |
|
Southern Power Company |
|
|
|
|
|
|
x |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Description of |
|
Shares Outstanding |
|
Registrant |
|
Common Stock |
|
at June 30, 2005 |
|
The Southern Company |
|
Par Value $5 Per Share |
|
|
746,811,645 |
|
Alabama Power Company |
|
Par Value $40 Per Share |
|
|
9,250,000 |
|
Georgia Power Company |
|
Without Par Value |
|
|
7,761,500 |
|
Gulf Power Company |
|
Without Par Value |
|
|
992,717 |
|
Mississippi Power Company |
|
Without Par Value |
|
|
1,121,000 |
|
Savannah Electric and Power Company |
|
Par Value $5 Per Share |
|
|
10,844,635 |
|
Southern Power Company |
|
Par Value $0.01 Per Share |
|
|
1,000 |
|
This combined Form 10-Q is separately filed by The Southern Company, Alabama Power Company,
Georgia Power Company, Gulf Power Company, Mississippi Power Company, Savannah Electric and Power
Company, and Southern Power Company. Information contained herein relating to any individual
company is filed by such company on its own behalf. Each company makes no representation as to
information relating to the other companies.
INDEX TO QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q
June 30, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page |
|
|
|
Number |
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 1. Financial Statements (Unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
|
64 |
|
|
|
|
66 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
76 |
|
|
|
|
76 |
|
|
|
|
77 |
|
|
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
|
80 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
|
91 |
|
|
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
|
94 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
104 |
|
|
|
|
104 |
|
|
|
|
105 |
|
|
|
|
106 |
|
|
|
|
108 |
|
|
|
|
114 |
|
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
|
27 |
|
3
INDEX TO QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q
June 30, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page |
|
|
|
Number |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
129 |
|
|
|
|
|
129 |
|
|
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities |
|
Inapplicable |
|
|
|
|
130 |
|
|
Item 5. Other Information |
|
Inapplicable |
|
|
|
|
132 |
|
|
|
|
|
137 |
|
4
DEFINITIONS
|
|
|
TERM |
|
MEANING |
|
|
|
Alabama Power
|
|
Alabama Power Company |
AFUDC
|
|
Allowance for funds used during construction |
BMA
|
|
Bond Market Association |
Clean Air Act
|
|
Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 |
DOE
|
|
U.S. Department of Energy |
ECO Plan
|
|
Environmental Compliance Overview Plan |
EPA
|
|
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency |
FASB
|
|
Financial Accounting Standards Board |
FERC
|
|
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission |
Form 10-K
|
|
Combined Annual Report on Form 10-K of Southern Company, |
|
|
Alabama Power, Georgia Power, Gulf Power, Mississippi Power, |
|
|
Savannah Electric, and Southern Power for the year ended |
|
|
December 31, 2004 |
Georgia Power
|
|
Georgia Power Company |
Gulf Power
|
|
Gulf Power Company |
IIC
|
|
Intercompany Interchange Contract |
IRC
|
|
Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended |
IRS
|
|
Internal Revenue Service |
LIBOR
|
|
London Interbank Offered Rate |
Mirant
|
|
Mirant Corporation |
Mississippi Power
|
|
Mississippi Power Company |
Moodys
|
|
Moodys Investors Service, Inc. |
MW
|
|
Megawatts |
NRC
|
|
Nuclear Regulatory Commission |
PEP
|
|
Performance Evaluation Plan |
PPA
|
|
Purchase Power Agreement |
PSC
|
|
Public Service Commission |
PUHCA
|
|
Public Utility Holding Company Act of 1935, as amended |
retail operating companies
|
|
Alabama Power, Georgia Power, Gulf Power, Mississippi Power, and Savannah Electric |
RTO
|
|
Regional Transmission Organization |
S&P
|
|
Standard and Poors, a division of The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. |
Savannah Electric
|
|
Savannah Electric and Power Company |
SCS
|
|
Southern Company Services, Inc. |
SEC
|
|
Securities and Exchange Commission |
Southern Company
|
|
The Southern Company |
Southern Company GAS
|
|
Southern Company Gas LLC |
Southern Company system
|
|
Southern Company, the retail operating companies, Southern Power, and other subsidiaries |
Southern Power
|
|
Southern Power Company |
Super Southeast
|
|
Southern Companys traditional
service territory, Alabama, Florida, Georgia, and Mississippi, plus the surrounding states of Kentucky, Louisiana, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee, and Virginia |
5
CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements. Forward-looking
statements include, among other things, statements concerning the strategic goals for Southern
Companys wholesale business, retail sales growth, storm damage cost recovery, environmental
regulations and expenditures, financing activities, completion of construction projects, impacts of
adoption of new accounting rules, and estimated construction and other expenditures. In some
cases, forward-looking statements can be identified by terminology such as may, will, could,
should, expects, plans, anticipates, believes, estimates, projects, predicts,
potential, or continue or the negative of these terms or other similar terminology. There are
various factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those suggested by the
forward-looking statements; accordingly, there can be no assurance that such indicated results will
be realized. These factors include:
|
|
the impact of recent and future federal and state regulatory change, including legislative and regulatory initiatives
regarding deregulation and restructuring of the electric utility industry, and also changes in environmental, tax, and
other laws and regulations to which Southern Company and its subsidiaries are subject, as well as changes in
application of existing laws and regulations; |
|
|
|
current and future litigation, regulatory investigations, proceedings, or inquiries, including the pending EPA civil
actions against certain Southern Company subsidiaries, FERC matters, IRS audits, and Mirant related matters; |
|
|
|
the effects, extent, and timing of the entry of additional competition in the markets in which Southern Companys
subsidiaries operate; |
|
|
|
variations in demand for electricity and gas, including those relating to weather, the general economy and population,
and business growth (and declines); |
|
|
|
available sources and costs of fuels; |
|
|
|
ability to control costs; |
|
|
|
investment performance of Southern Companys employee benefit plans; |
|
|
|
advances in technology; |
|
|
|
state and federal rate regulations and the impact of pending and future rate cases and negotiations; |
|
|
|
the performance of projects undertaken by the non-utility businesses and the success of efforts to invest in and
develop new opportunities; |
|
|
|
internal restructuring or other restructuring options that may be pursued; |
|
|
|
potential business strategies, including acquisitions or dispositions of assets or businesses, which cannot be assured
to be completed or beneficial to Southern Company or its subsidiaries; |
|
|
|
the ability of counterparties of Southern Company and its subsidiaries to make payments as and when due; |
|
|
|
the ability to obtain new short- and long-term contracts with neighboring utilities; |
|
|
|
the direct or indirect effect on Southern Companys business resulting from terrorist incidents and the threat of
terrorist incidents; |
|
|
|
interest rate fluctuations and financial market conditions and the results of financing efforts, including Southern
Companys and its subsidiaries credit ratings; |
|
|
|
the ability of Southern Company and its subsidiaries to obtain additional generating capacity at competitive prices; |
|
|
|
catastrophic events such as fires, earthquakes, explosions, floods, hurricanes, or other similar occurrences; |
|
|
|
the direct or indirect effects on Southern Companys business resulting from incidents similar to the August 2003 power
outage in the Northeast; |
|
|
|
the effect of accounting pronouncements issued periodically by standard setting bodies; and |
|
|
|
other factors discussed elsewhere herein and in other reports filed by the registrants from time to time with the SEC. |
The registrants expressly disclaim any obligation to update any forward-looking statements.
6
THE SOUTHERN COMPANY
AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
7
THE SOUTHERN COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME (UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months |
|
|
For the Six Months |
|
|
|
Ended June 30, |
|
|
Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Operating Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retail revenues |
|
$ |
2,555,091 |
|
|
$ |
2,477,856 |
|
|
$ |
4,823,900 |
|
|
$ |
4,621,945 |
|
Sales for resale |
|
|
384,909 |
|
|
|
343,793 |
|
|
|
731,974 |
|
|
|
694,530 |
|
Other electric revenues |
|
|
109,347 |
|
|
|
94,220 |
|
|
|
210,442 |
|
|
|
187,791 |
|
Other revenues |
|
|
95,088 |
|
|
|
93,026 |
|
|
|
242,579 |
|
|
|
236,944 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating revenues |
|
|
3,144,435 |
|
|
|
3,008,895 |
|
|
|
6,008,895 |
|
|
|
5,741,210 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fuel |
|
|
1,012,474 |
|
|
|
869,978 |
|
|
|
1,933,858 |
|
|
|
1,708,750 |
|
Purchased power |
|
|
123,677 |
|
|
|
218,066 |
|
|
|
221,893 |
|
|
|
337,824 |
|
Other operations |
|
|
579,452 |
|
|
|
569,443 |
|
|
|
1,105,551 |
|
|
|
1,083,458 |
|
Maintenance |
|
|
259,975 |
|
|
|
268,459 |
|
|
|
554,067 |
|
|
|
505,956 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
287,879 |
|
|
|
233,449 |
|
|
|
580,488 |
|
|
|
474,103 |
|
Taxes other than income taxes |
|
|
162,863 |
|
|
|
154,583 |
|
|
|
325,861 |
|
|
|
313,067 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
2,426,320 |
|
|
|
2,313,978 |
|
|
|
4,721,718 |
|
|
|
4,423,158 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Income |
|
|
718,115 |
|
|
|
694,917 |
|
|
|
1,287,177 |
|
|
|
1,318,052 |
|
Other Income and (Expense): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for equity funds used during construction |
|
|
14,011 |
|
|
|
9,467 |
|
|
|
30,870 |
|
|
|
17,651 |
|
Interest income |
|
|
6,223 |
|
|
|
6,455 |
|
|
|
11,495 |
|
|
|
14,109 |
|
Equity in losses of unconsolidated subsidiaries |
|
|
(29,574 |
) |
|
|
(21,253 |
) |
|
|
(52,678 |
) |
|
|
(46,569 |
) |
Leveraged lease income |
|
|
18,677 |
|
|
|
17,005 |
|
|
|
36,925 |
|
|
|
32,932 |
|
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized |
|
|
(154,216 |
) |
|
|
(138,613 |
) |
|
|
(293,202 |
) |
|
|
(269,198 |
) |
Interest expense to affiliate trusts |
|
|
(31,931 |
) |
|
|
(31,985 |
) |
|
|
(63,861 |
) |
|
|
(31,985 |
) |
Distributions on mandatorily redeemable preferred
securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(31,168 |
) |
Preferred dividends of subsidiaries |
|
|
(7,402 |
) |
|
|
(9,539 |
) |
|
|
(14,804 |
) |
|
|
(15,011 |
) |
Other income (expense), net |
|
|
(1,895 |
) |
|
|
(15,302 |
) |
|
|
(7,631 |
) |
|
|
(23,464 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income and (expense) |
|
|
(186,107 |
) |
|
|
(183,765 |
) |
|
|
(352,886 |
) |
|
|
(352,703 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings Before Income Taxes |
|
|
532,008 |
|
|
|
511,152 |
|
|
|
934,291 |
|
|
|
965,349 |
|
Income taxes |
|
|
145,187 |
|
|
|
159,020 |
|
|
|
224,510 |
|
|
|
282,075 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Net Income |
|
$ |
386,821 |
|
|
$ |
352,132 |
|
|
$ |
709,781 |
|
|
$ |
683,274 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock Data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated basic earnings per share |
|
$ |
0.52 |
|
|
$ |
0.48 |
|
|
$ |
0.95 |
|
|
$ |
0.93 |
|
Consolidated diluted earnings per share |
|
$ |
0.52 |
|
|
$ |
0.47 |
|
|
$ |
0.95 |
|
|
$ |
0.92 |
|
Average number of basic shares of common
stock outstanding (in thousands) |
|
|
746,823 |
|
|
|
738,185 |
|
|
|
745,424 |
|
|
|
737,412 |
|
Average number of diluted shares of common
stock outstanding (in thousands) |
|
|
751,016 |
|
|
|
742,453 |
|
|
|
749,360 |
|
|
|
741,920 |
|
Cash dividends paid per share of common stock |
|
$ |
0.3725 |
|
|
$ |
0.350 |
|
|
$ |
0.7300 |
|
|
$ |
0.700 |
|
The accompanying notes as they relate to Southern Company are an integral part of these condensed financial statements.
8
THE SOUTHERN COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Six Months |
|
|
|
Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Operating Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated net income |
|
$ |
709,781 |
|
|
$ |
683,274 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile consolidated net income
to net cash provided from operating activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
687,205 |
|
|
|
569,766 |
|
Deferred income taxes and investment tax credits |
|
|
175,751 |
|
|
|
325,804 |
|
Allowance for equity funds used during construction |
|
|
(30,870 |
) |
|
|
(17,651 |
) |
Equity in losses of unconsolidated subsidiaries |
|
|
52,678 |
|
|
|
46,569 |
|
Leveraged lease income |
|
|
(36,925 |
) |
|
|
(32,932 |
) |
Pension, postretirement, and other employee benefits |
|
|
25,860 |
|
|
|
8,794 |
|
Tax benefit of stock options |
|
|
36,963 |
|
|
|
15,110 |
|
Hedge settlements |
|
|
(19,860 |
) |
|
|
5,548 |
|
Natural disaster reserve accounting order |
|
|
45,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other, net |
|
|
(48,388 |
) |
|
|
(53,537 |
) |
Changes in certain current assets and liabilities
|
|
Receivables, net |
|
|
(361,124 |
) |
|
|
(282,363 |
) |
Fossil fuel stock |
|
|
(112,968 |
) |
|
|
(7,501 |
) |
Materials and supplies |
|
|
(21,615 |
) |
|
|
(9,699 |
) |
Other current assets |
|
|
43,757 |
|
|
|
(5,916 |
) |
Accounts payable |
|
|
(109,448 |
) |
|
|
(24,771 |
) |
Accrued taxes |
|
|
(80,978 |
) |
|
|
(138,495 |
) |
Accrued compensation |
|
|
(210,061 |
) |
|
|
(199,683 |
) |
Other current liabilities |
|
|
47,384 |
|
|
|
19,158 |
|
Net cash provided from operating activities |
|
|
792,142 |
|
|
|
901,475 |
|
Investing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross property additions |
|
|
(1,183,777 |
) |
|
|
(1,039,120 |
) |
Investment in unconsolidated subsidiaries |
|
|
(51,870 |
) |
|
|
(49,276 |
) |
Cost of removal net of salvage |
|
|
(41,485 |
) |
|
|
(42,078 |
) |
Construction receivables/payables, net |
|
|
(59,860 |
) |
|
|
(20,768 |
) |
Other |
|
|
44,808 |
|
|
|
(12,566 |
) |
Net cash used for investing activities |
|
|
(1,292,184 |
) |
|
|
(1,163,808 |
) |
Financing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in notes payable, net |
|
|
510,947 |
|
|
|
170,439 |
|
Proceeds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
870,695 |
|
|
|
840,122 |
|
Mandatorily redeemable preferred securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
200,000 |
|
Preferred stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
175,000 |
|
Common stock |
|
|
148,609 |
|
|
|
62,059 |
|
Redemptions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
(436,474 |
) |
|
|
(493,836 |
) |
Mandatorily redeemable preferred securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(240,000 |
) |
Preferred stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(28,388 |
) |
Common stock repurchased |
|
|
(62,321 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Special deposits redemption funds |
|
|
(102,481 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Payment of common stock dividends |
|
|
(543,637 |
) |
|
|
(515,824 |
) |
Other |
|
|
(21,737 |
) |
|
|
(27,348 |
) |
Net cash provided from financing activities |
|
|
363,601 |
|
|
|
142,224 |
|
Net Change in Cash and Cash Equivalents |
|
|
(136,441 |
) |
|
|
(120,109 |
) |
Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Period |
|
|
373,199 |
|
|
|
311,274 |
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Period |
|
$ |
236,758 |
|
|
$ |
191,165 |
|
Supplemental Cash Flow Information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid during the period for |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest (net of $12,589 and $22,613 capitalized for 2005 and 2004, respectively) |
|
$ |
312,975 |
|
|
$ |
277,681 |
|
Income taxes (net of refunds) |
|
$ |
45,896 |
|
|
$ |
30,810 |
|
The accompanying notes as they relate to Southern Company are an integral part of these condensed financial statements.
9
THE SOUTHERN COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At June 30, |
|
|
At December 31, |
|
Assets |
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Current Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
236,758 |
|
|
$ |
373,199 |
|
Receivables |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer accounts receivable |
|
|
827,910 |
|
|
|
755,436 |
|
Unbilled revenues |
|
|
357,901 |
|
|
|
304,479 |
|
Under recovered regulatory clause revenues |
|
|
372,617 |
|
|
|
530,898 |
|
Special deposits redemption funds |
|
|
100,005 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
Other accounts and notes receivable |
|
|
306,626 |
|
|
|
310,966 |
|
Accumulated provision for uncollectible accounts |
|
|
(37,316 |
) |
|
|
(46,100 |
) |
Fossil fuel stock, at average cost |
|
|
438,338 |
|
|
|
325,370 |
|
Vacation pay |
|
|
105,292 |
|
|
|
105,437 |
|
Materials and supplies, at average cost |
|
|
623,434 |
|
|
|
601,820 |
|
Prepaid expenses |
|
|
140,770 |
|
|
|
126,059 |
|
Other |
|
|
113,662 |
|
|
|
83,665 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
3,585,997 |
|
|
|
3,471,234 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, Plant, and Equipment: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In service |
|
|
42,905,926 |
|
|
|
41,437,517 |
|
Less accumulated depreciation |
|
|
15,289,111 |
|
|
|
14,950,939 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,616,815 |
|
|
|
26,486,578 |
|
Nuclear fuel, at amortized cost |
|
|
212,535 |
|
|
|
218,133 |
|
Construction work in progress |
|
|
1,065,888 |
|
|
|
1,656,772 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total property, plant, and equipment |
|
|
28,895,238 |
|
|
|
28,361,483 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Property and Investments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nuclear decommissioning trusts, at fair value |
|
|
920,020 |
|
|
|
904,828 |
|
Leveraged leases |
|
|
1,041,834 |
|
|
|
976,000 |
|
Other |
|
|
359,765 |
|
|
|
380,904 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other property and investments |
|
|
2,321,619 |
|
|
|
2,261,732 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred Charges and Other Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred charges related to income taxes |
|
|
877,424 |
|
|
|
864,477 |
|
Prepaid pension costs |
|
|
1,004,737 |
|
|
|
985,633 |
|
Unamortized debt issuance expense |
|
|
164,459 |
|
|
|
153,351 |
|
Unamortized loss on reacquired debt |
|
|
316,101 |
|
|
|
323,394 |
|
Deferred under recovered regulatory clause revenues |
|
|
362,692 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other regulatory assets |
|
|
199,314 |
|
|
|
246,644 |
|
Other |
|
|
342,561 |
|
|
|
294,138 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred charges and other assets |
|
|
3,267,288 |
|
|
|
2,867,637 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets |
|
$ |
38,070,142 |
|
|
$ |
36,962,086 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes as they relate to Southern Company are an integral part of these condensed financial statements.
10
THE SOUTHERN COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At June 30, |
|
|
At December 31, |
|
Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity |
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Current Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities due within one year |
|
$ |
1,168,641 |
|
|
$ |
983,282 |
|
Notes payable |
|
|
937,341 |
|
|
|
426,394 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
719,928 |
|
|
|
884,240 |
|
Customer deposits |
|
|
209,858 |
|
|
|
200,454 |
|
Accrued taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes |
|
|
113,103 |
|
|
|
47,237 |
|
Other |
|
|
255,224 |
|
|
|
243,200 |
|
Accrued interest |
|
|
189,946 |
|
|
|
179,301 |
|
Accrued vacation pay |
|
|
137,186 |
|
|
|
137,452 |
|
Accrued compensation |
|
|
221,863 |
|
|
|
431,023 |
|
Other |
|
|
337,844 |
|
|
|
278,477 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
4,290,934 |
|
|
|
3,811,060 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term Debt |
|
|
10,727,802 |
|
|
|
10,488,076 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term Debt Payable to Affiliated Trusts |
|
|
1,960,644 |
|
|
|
1,960,644 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred Credits and Other Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated deferred income taxes |
|
|
5,331,754 |
|
|
|
5,237,162 |
|
Deferred credits related to income taxes |
|
|
327,646 |
|
|
|
372,528 |
|
Accumulated deferred investment tax credits |
|
|
539,266 |
|
|
|
552,108 |
|
Employee benefit obligations |
|
|
908,060 |
|
|
|
864,216 |
|
Asset retirement obligations |
|
|
932,397 |
|
|
|
903,385 |
|
Other cost of removal obligations |
|
|
1,317,722 |
|
|
|
1,295,871 |
|
Miscellaneous regulatory liabilities |
|
|
331,926 |
|
|
|
327,710 |
|
Other |
|
|
292,111 |
|
|
|
311,167 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred credits and other liabilities |
|
|
9,980,882 |
|
|
|
9,864,147 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities |
|
|
26,960,262 |
|
|
|
26,123,927 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred Stock of Subsidiaries |
|
|
560,442 |
|
|
|
560,472 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stockholders Equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, par value $5 per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Authorized 1 billion shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issued June 30, 2005: 748,895,394 Shares; |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2004: 741,734,998 Shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treasury June 30, 2005: 2,083,749 Shares; |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2004: 240,425 Shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Par value |
|
|
3,744,477 |
|
|
|
3,708,675 |
|
Paid-in capital |
|
|
1,018,964 |
|
|
|
868,747 |
|
Treasury, at cost |
|
|
(68,691 |
) |
|
|
(5,557 |
) |
Retained earnings |
|
|
6,004,775 |
|
|
|
5,838,986 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
|
(150,087 |
) |
|
|
(133,164 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Common Stockholders Equity |
|
|
10,549,438 |
|
|
|
10,277,687 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities and Stockholders Equity |
|
$ |
38,070,142 |
|
|
$ |
36,962,086 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes as they relate to Southern Company are an integral part of these condensed financial statements.
11
THE SOUTHERN COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months |
|
|
For the Six Months |
|
|
|
Ended June 30, |
|
|
Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Consolidated Net Income |
|
$ |
386,821 |
|
|
$ |
352,132 |
|
|
$ |
709,781 |
|
|
$ |
683,274 |
|
Other comprehensive income (loss): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in fair value of marketable securities, net of tax
of $(346), $(754), $(2,075) and $3,307, respectively |
|
|
(598 |
) |
|
|
(1,721 |
) |
|
|
(3,924 |
) |
|
|
5,902 |
|
Changes in fair value of qualifying hedges, net of tax
of $(12,769), $15,514, $(10,744) and $7,803,
respectively |
|
|
(20,515 |
) |
|
|
25,274 |
|
|
|
(17,352 |
) |
|
|
12,570 |
|
Reclassification adjustment for amounts included in net
income,
net of tax of $988, $2,214, $2,998 and $4,385,
respectively |
|
|
1,202 |
|
|
|
3,570 |
|
|
|
4,353 |
|
|
|
7,060 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME |
|
$ |
366,910 |
|
|
$ |
379,255 |
|
|
$ |
692,858 |
|
|
$ |
708,806 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
accompanying notes as they relate to Southern Company are an integral
part of these condensed financial statements.
12
THE SOUTHERN COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
SECOND QUARTER 2005 vs. SECOND QUARTER 2004
AND
YEAR-TO-DATE 2005 vs. YEAR-TO-DATE 2004
OVERVIEW
Discussion of the results of operations is focused on Southern Companys primary business of
electricity sales in the Southeast by the retail operating companies Alabama Power, Georgia
Power, Gulf Power, Mississippi Power, and Savannah Electric and Southern Power. Southern Power
is an electric wholesale generation subsidiary with market-based rate authority. Southern
Companys other business activities include investments in synthetic fuels and leveraged lease
projects, telecommunications, energy-related services, and natural gas marketing. For additional
information on these businesses, see BUSINESS The SOUTHERN System Retail Operating Companies,
Southern Power, and Other Business in Item 1 of the Form 10-K. Also see Note (P) to the
Condensed Financial Statements herein for information on a letter of intent signed in July 2005 to
sell the assets of Southern Company GAS, the natural gas marketing business.
Southern Company continues to focus on several key performance indicators. These indicators
include customer satisfaction, peak season equivalent forced outage rate, return on equity, and
earnings per share. For additional information on these indicators, see MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND
ANALYSIS OVERVIEW Key Performance Indicators of Southern Company in Item 7 of the Form 10-K.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Earnings
Southern Companys second quarter and year-to-date 2005 earnings were $387 million ($0.52
per share) and $710 million ($0.95 per share) compared with $352 million ($0.48 per share) and $683
million ($0.93 per share), respectively, for the corresponding periods in 2004. Increases in
earnings in the second quarter and year-to-date 2005 primarily resulted from sustained economic
strength and customer growth in the Southern Company service area, as well as a base rate increase
at Georgia Power. These increases were partially offset by mild weather, the expiration of certain
provisions of Georgia Powers three-year retail rate plan ending December 31, 2004 (2001 Retail
Rate Plan), and higher maintenance costs as compared to the corresponding periods in 2004.
Significant income statement items appropriate for discussion include the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (Decrease) |
|
|
Second Quarter |
|
Year-To-Date |
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
% |
|
(in thousands) |
|
% |
Retail revenues |
|
$ |
77,235 |
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
$ |
201,955 |
|
|
|
4.4 |
|
Sales for resale |
|
|
41,116 |
|
|
|
12.0 |
|
|
|
37,444 |
|
|
|
5.4 |
|
Other electric revenues |
|
|
15,127 |
|
|
|
16.1 |
|
|
|
22,651 |
|
|
|
12.1 |
|
Fuel expense |
|
|
142,496 |
|
|
|
16.4 |
|
|
|
225,108 |
|
|
|
13.2 |
|
Purchased power expense |
|
|
(94,389 |
) |
|
|
(43.3 |
) |
|
|
(115,931 |
) |
|
|
(34.3 |
) |
Maintenance expense |
|
|
(8,484 |
) |
|
|
(3.2 |
) |
|
|
48,111 |
|
|
|
9.5 |
|
Depreciation and amortization expense |
|
|
54,430 |
|
|
|
23.3 |
|
|
|
106,385 |
|
|
|
22.4 |
|
Allowance for equity funds used during
construction |
|
|
4,544 |
|
|
|
48.0 |
|
|
|
13,219 |
|
|
|
74.9 |
|
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized |
|
|
15,603 |
|
|
|
11.3 |
|
|
|
24,004 |
|
|
|
8.9 |
|
Other income (expense), net |
|
|
13,407 |
|
|
|
87.6 |
|
|
|
15,833 |
|
|
|
67.5 |
|
Income taxes |
|
|
(13,833 |
) |
|
|
(8.7 |
) |
|
|
(57,565 |
) |
|
|
(20.4 |
) |
13
THE SOUTHERN COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Retail revenues. The chart below reflects the primary drivers of the 3.1% and 4.4% increases
in retail revenues in the second quarter and year-to-date 2005 when compared to the prior year.
Changes in revenue related to cost recovery mechanisms such as fuel and environmental have no
effect on net income. In the second quarter and year-to-date 2005, retail kilowatt-hour energy
sales decreased by 1.8% and 1.3%, respectively, from the same periods a year ago, primarily due to
milder weather. The decrease was partially offset by continued customer and demand growth due to
sustained economic growth in the Southeast. The number of retail customers increased by 1.5% and
weather-adjusted average consumption by retail customers increased by 0.5% and 0.7%, respectively,
in the second quarter and year-to-date 2005 when compared with the second quarter and year-to-date
2004.
Details of retail revenues are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second Quarter |
|
|
|
|
|
Year-to-Date |
|
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
% change |
|
(in millions) |
|
% change |
Retail prior year |
|
$ |
2,478 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
4,622 |
|
|
|
|
|
Change in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Base rates |
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
101 |
|
|
|
2.2 |
|
Sales growth |
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
64 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
Weather |
|
|
(47 |
) |
|
|
(1.9 |
) |
|
|
(73 |
) |
|
|
(1.6 |
) |
Fuel cost recovery |
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
95 |
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
Other cost recovery |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
Retail current year |
|
$ |
2,555 |
|
|
|
3.1 |
% |
|
$ |
4,824 |
|
|
|
4.4 |
% |
|
Sales for resale. In the second quarter and year-to-date 2005, sales for resale increased
$41.1 million, or 12.0%, and $37.4 million, or 5.4%, respectively, over the same periods in 2004. The increases reflect a rise in fuel revenues due to the higher cost of fuel and new
wholesale contracts between Georgia Power and 30 electric membership cooperatives (EMCs) and Flint
EMC, both beginning in January 2005. In addition, Southern Power entered into new wholesale
contracts with Flint EMC in January 2005 and added additional wholesale revenues through its
acquisition of Oleander Power Project, L.P. (Oleander) and assumption of associated PPAs in June
2005. See FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL Other Matters herein for additional information on the
Oleander acquisition.
Other electric revenues. In the second quarter and year-to-date 2005, when compared to the
same periods in 2004, other electric revenues increased $15.1 million, or 16.1%, and $22.7 million,
or 12.1%, respectively. These increases were primarily due to higher transmission revenues of $6.1
million and $8.5 million, and increased outdoor lighting revenues of $1.7 million and $3.2 million
in the second quarter and year-to-date 2005, respectively, as compared to the same periods in 2004.
In addition, customer fees increased $1.3 million and $2.4 million in the second quarter and
year-to-date 2005, respectively, over the corresponding periods in 2004. Other electric revenues
also increased by $1.5 million in the second quarter and year-to-date 2005 when compared to the
same periods in 2004 as the result of an Alabama Power customers early termination of a contract.
Fuel expense. Fuel expense was higher in the second quarter and year-to-date 2005 due to
increases of 19.0% and 15.0%, respectively, in the average unit cost of fuel per net kilowatt-hour
generated when compared to the same periods in the prior year. Increases in fuel expense at the
retail operating companies are generally offset by fuel revenues and do not affect net income.
Fuel expenses incurred under Southern Powers PPAs are generally the responsibility of the
counterparties, and do not significantly affect net income.
14
THE SOUTHERN COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Purchased power expense. The 43.3% and 34.3% decreases in purchased power expense in the
second quarter and year-to-date 2005, respectively, compared with the same periods in the prior
year are primarily a result of lower kilowatt-hour purchases resulting from milder weather reducing
demand and a decrease in the cost of purchased power per kilowatt-hour. Since these expenses are
offset by energy revenues, they generally do not have a significant impact on earnings.
Maintenance expense. The $48.1 million increase in maintenance expense year-to-date 2005 is
mainly attributable to $45 million of expenses recorded by Alabama Power in accordance with an
accounting order approved by the Alabama PSC to offset the costs of Hurricane Ivan and restore the
natural disaster reserve. In accordance with the accounting order, Alabama Power also returned
certain regulatory liabilities related to deferred taxes to its retail customers; therefore, the
combined effects of this accounting order had no impact on net income. See Note 3 to the financial
statements of Southern Company under Gulf Power and Alabama Power Storm Damage Recovery in Item 8
of the Form 10-K and Income taxes below for additional information.
Depreciation and amortization expense. The $54.4 million and $106.4 million increases in
depreciation and amortization in the second quarter and year-to-date 2005, respectively, when
compared to the prior year are due to the expiration in 2004 of certain provisions in Georgia
Powers 2001 Retail Rate Plan. In accordance with the 2001 Retail Rate Plan, Georgia Power
amortized an accelerated cost recovery liability equally as a credit to amortization expense and
recognized new Georgia PSC-certified purchased power costs in rates evenly over the three years
ended December 31, 2004. This treatment resulted in a credit to amortization expense of $47
million and $94 million during the second quarter and year-to-date 2004, respectively. See Note 3
to the financial statements of Southern Company under Georgia Power Retail Rate Activity in Item
8 of the Form 10-K for additional information.
Allowance for equity funds used during construction. The $13.2 million increase in AFUDC
equity year-to-date 2005 compared to the same period in the prior year relates primarily to
construction of the McIntosh combined cycle units 10 and 11 by Georgia Power and Savannah Electric.
See Note 3 to the financial statements of Southern Company under Plant McIntosh Construction
Project in Item 8 of the Form 10-K for further information. AFUDC equity is non-taxable. See
Note (H) to the Condensed Financial Statements herein for information on the impact on Southern
Companys 2005 annual effective tax rate.
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized. The $15.6 million and $24.0 million increases
in interest expense, net of amounts capitalized, in the second quarter and year-to-date 2005,
respectively, when compared to the same periods in 2004 are mainly attributed to an increase in the
amount of senior notes outstanding and lower amounts of interest capitalized as projects have
reached completion, partially offset by refinancing with lower interest-rate long-term debt. See
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS FINANCIAL CONDITION AND LIQUIDITY Financing Activities
of Southern Company in Item 7 of the Form 10-K and herein for additional information.
Other income (expense), net. The increases in other income (expense), net, of $13.4 million
and $15.8 million in the second quarter and year-to-date 2005, respectively, when compared to the
same periods in the prior year, are a result of $5.5 million and $6.2 million increases in flat
bill revenues for the second quarter and year-to-date 2005, respectively, and a $4.9 million
increase for the second quarter and year-to-date 2005, related to the timing of the employee stock
ownership plan contribution when compared to the prior year periods.
Income taxes. The $13.8 million decrease in income taxes in the second quarter 2005 compared
to the prior year is primarily due to a $8.8 million increase in tax benefits received related to
higher production at synfuel production facilities. The $57.6 million decrease in year-to-date
2005 income taxes over the prior year is primarily the result of the impact of the Alabama PSC
accounting order discussed under Maintenance expense
above and, along with other items, is expected to result in an annual effective income tax rate of
15
THE SOUTHERN COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
approximately 27% for Southern Company in 2005. See Note 5 to the financial statements of Southern
Company in Item 8 of the Form 10-K and Note (H) to the Condensed Financial Statements herein for
additional information.
FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL
The results of operations discussed above are not necessarily indicative of future earnings
potential. The level of Southern Companys future earnings depends on numerous factors that affect
the opportunities, challenges, and risks of Southern Companys primary business of selling
electricity. These factors include the retail operating companies ability to maintain a stable
regulatory environment, to achieve energy sales growth while containing costs, and to recover costs
related to growing demand and increasingly stringent environmental standards. Another major factor
is the profitability of the competitive market-based wholesale generating business and federal
regulatory policy, which may impact Southern Companys level of participation in this market.
Future earnings for the electricity business in the near term will depend, in part, upon growth in
energy sales, which is subject to a number of factors. These factors include weather, competition,
new energy contracts with neighboring utilities, energy conservation practiced by customers, the
price of electricity, the price elasticity of demand, and the rate of economic growth in the
service area. For additional information relating to these issues, see BUSINESS The SOUTHERN
System Risk Factors in Item 1 and MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS FUTURE EARNINGS
POTENTIAL of Southern Company in Item 7 of the Form 10-K.
Environmental Matters
Compliance costs related to the Clean Air Act and other environmental regulations could affect
earnings if such costs cannot be recovered. For additional information, including information on
certain environmental litigation, see MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS FUTURE EARNINGS
POTENTIAL Environmental Matters of Southern Company in Item 7 and Note 3 to the financial
statements of Southern Company under Environmental Matters in Item 8 of the Form 10-K.
New Source Review Actions
On June 3, 2005, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Alabama issued its decision
in favor of Alabama Power on two primary legal issues in the case: (1) the scope of the routine
maintenance repair and replacement exclusion under the New Source Review rules and (2) the proper
test for calculating emissions increases under those rules. The court decided that routine
maintenance repair and replacement must be defined with reference to what is routine in the
industry as opposed to what is routine at an individual unit and emissions increases must be
measured against the maximum hourly emission rate. The decision does not resolve the case, nor
does it address other legal issues associated with the EPAs allegations involving Plant Miller
Units 3 and 4. In separate orders, the court dismissed Alabama Powers motion for summary judgment
on the other claims, stayed the entire case, and referred the parties to mediation to be completed
by September 9, 2005. Alabama Power may refile its motion for summary judgment if the mediation
proves unsuccessful. The Georgia Power and Savannah Electric case, which is pending in federal
district court in Georgia, remains administratively closed. The ultimate outcome of these matters
cannot now be determined. See MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL
Environmental Matters New Source Review Actions of Southern Company in Item 7 and Note 3 to the
financial statements of Southern Company under Environmental Matters New Source Review Actions
in Item 8 of the Form 10-K and Note (B) to the Condensed Financial Statements herein under New
Source Review Actions for additional information.
16
THE SOUTHERN COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Plant Wansley Environmental Litigation
In March 2005, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit accepted Georgia Powers petition
for review of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgias December 15, 2004
order related to the Plant Wansley environmental litigation. Oral argument on that appeal has not
been scheduled. The ultimate outcome of this matter cannot now be determined. See MANAGEMENTS
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL Environmental Matters Plant Wansley
Environmental Litigation of Southern Company in Item 7 and Note 3 to the financial statements of
Southern Company under Environmental Matters Plant Wansley Environmental Litigation in Item 8
of the Form 10-K and Note (B) to the Condensed Financial Statements herein under Plant Wansley
Environmental Litigation for additional information.
Other Environmental Matters
The EPA issued the final Clean Air Interstate Rule on March 10, 2005. The rule addresses sulfur
dioxide (SO2) and nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions that contribute to
nonattainment of the eight-hour ozone and fine particulate matter National Ambient Air Quality
Standards. Twenty-eight eastern states, including each of the
states within Southern Companys service area, are subject to the fine particulate and/or the
eight-hour ozone requirements set forth within the rule. The rule may require additional
reductions of NOx and/or SO2 to be achieved by the installation of additional
controls at Southern Company facilities or through the purchase of allowances. The impact of this
final rule on Southern Company will, however, depend on the outcome of legal challenges and
development and implementation of applicable state regulations and therefore cannot be determined
at this time.
On March 15, 2005, the EPA announced the final Clean Air Mercury Rule, selecting a
cap-and-trade approach to be implemented in two phases, 2010 and 2018. The rule sets a permanent
cap on emissions at the 2018 level and provides for an emissions allowance trading market. The
impact of this final rule on Southern Company will depend on the outcome of legal challenges and
development and implementation of applicable state regulations and therefore cannot be determined
at this time.
On June 15, 2005, the EPA issued final rules addressing Best Available Retrofit Technology
(BART) standards under the Regional Haze Program. States must develop regulations to implement the
federal regional haze requirements, including BART standards, by December 17, 2007. The impact of
the final BART rules on Southern Company will depend on the outcome of any litigation over the
final rules and the development and implementation of the applicable state regulations and
therefore cannot be determined at this time.
On June 14 and 15, 2005, the EPA published final rules approving the redesignation of the
Atlanta metro area to attainment under the one-hour ground-level ozone standard.
FERC and State PSC Matters
Market-Based Rate Authority
See MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL FERC and State
PSC Matters Market-Based Rate Authority of Southern Company in Item 7 and Note 3 to the
financial statements of Southern Company under Market-Based Rate Authority in Item 8 of the
Form 10-K for information on the FERCs April 2004 order adopting a new interim analysis for
measuring generation market power and a proceeding initiated by the FERC in December 2004 to
assess Southern Companys generation dominance within its retail service territory. Each of the
retail operating companies and Southern Power has authorization from the FERC to sell power to
non-affiliates at market-based prices. The retail operating companies and Southern Power also
have FERC authority to make short-term opportunity sales at
17
THE SOUTHERN COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
market rates. Specific FERC
approval must be obtained with respect to a market-based contract with an
affiliate. On February 15, 2005, Southern Company submitted additional information related to
generation dominance in its retail service territory. On July 8, 2005, the FERC initiated a
hearing before an administrative law judge to review the generation market power issues. Any
new market-based rate transactions in its retail service territory entered into after February
27, 2005 will be subject to refund to the level of the default cost-based rates, pending the
outcome of the proceeding. In the event that the FERCs default mitigation measures are
ultimately applied, the retail operating companies and Southern Power may be required to charge
cost-based rates for certain wholesale sales in the Southern Company retail service territory,
which may be lower than negotiated market-based rates. The impact of such sales through June
30, 2005 is not material to Southern Companys net income. The final outcome of this matter
will depend on the form in which the final methodology for assessing generation market power and
mitigation rules may be ultimately adopted and cannot be determined at this time.
In addition, on May 5, 2005, the FERC issued an order expanding the generation market power
proceeding initiated in December 2004 to include an investigation of whether Southern Company
satisfies the other three parts of the FERCs market-based rate analysis: transmission market
power, barriers to entry, and affiliate abuse or reciprocal dealing. The FERC established a new
refund period related to this expanded investigation. Any and all new market-based rate
transactions involving any Southern Company subsidiary will be subject to refund to the extent the
FERC orders lower rates beginning July 19, 2005. The FERC also directed that this expanded
proceeding be held in abeyance pending the outcome of the proceeding on the IIC discussed below.
Southern Company and its subsidiaries believe that there is no meritorious basis for these
allegations and intend to vigorously defend themselves in the proceeding. However, the final
outcome of this matter, including any remedies to be applied in the event of an adverse ruling in
this proceeding, cannot now be determined.
Intercompany Interchange Contract
Also, on May 5, 2005, the FERC initiated a new proceeding to examine (1) the provisions of the IIC
among Alabama Power, Georgia Power, Gulf Power, Mississippi Power, Savannah Electric, Southern
Power, and SCS, as agent, under the terms of which the power pool of Southern Company is operated,
and, in particular, the propriety of the continued inclusion of Southern Power as a party to the
IIC, (2) whether any parties to the IIC have violated the FERCs standards of conduct applicable to
utility companies that are transmission providers, and (3) whether Southern Companys code of
conduct defining Southern Power as a system company rather than a marketing affiliate is just
and reasonable. In 2000, in connection with the formation of Southern Power, the FERC authorized
Southern Powers inclusion in the IIC. The FERC also previously approved Southern Companys code
of conduct. The FERC order directs that the administrative law judge who presided over the
McIntosh PPA proceeding be assigned to preside over the hearing in this proceeding and that the
testimony and exhibits presented in that proceeding be preserved to the extent appropriate. See
Note 3 to the financial statements of Southern Company under Plant McIntosh Construction Project
in Item 8 of the Form 10-K for further information on the McIntosh PPA proceeding. Effective July
19, 2005, revenues from transactions under the IIC involving any Southern Company subsidiaries will
be subject to refund to the extent the FERC orders any changes to the IIC.
Southern Company and its subsidiaries believe that there is no meritorious basis for these
allegations and intend to vigorously defend themselves in the proceeding. However, the final
outcome of this matter, including any remedies to be applied in the event of an adverse ruling in
this proceeding, cannot now be determined.
18
THE SOUTHERN COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Generation Interconnection Agreements
See MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL FERC and State PSC Matters
Generation Interconnection Agreements of Southern Company in Item 7 of the Form 10-K for
information on the FERCs Order 2003 related to standardization of generation interconnection
agreements and procedures. The FERC has indicated that Order 2003, which was effective January 20,
2004, is to be applied prospectively to interconnection agreements. Subsidiaries of Tenaska, Inc.,
as counterparties to three previously executed interconnection agreements with subsidiaries of
Southern Company, have filed complaints at the FERC requesting that the FERC modify the agreements
and that Southern Company refund a total of $19 million previously paid for interconnection
facilities, with interest. Southern Company has also received similar requests from other entities
totaling approximately $14 million. Southern Company has opposed such relief, and the proceedings
are still pending. The impact of Order 2003 and its subsequent rehearings on Southern Company and
the final results of these matters cannot be determined at this time.
Retail Fuel Cost Recovery
The retail operating companies each have established fuel cost recovery rates approved by their
respective state PSCs. In recent quarters, the retail operating companies have experienced higher
than expected fuel costs for coal and gas. These higher fuel costs have increased the under
recovered fuel costs included in the balance sheets. The retail operating companies will continue
to monitor the under recovered fuel cost balance in light of these higher fuel costs.
Alabama Power fuel costs are recovered under Rate ECR (Energy Cost Recovery), which provides
for the addition of a fuel and energy cost factor to base rates. Alabama Powers under-recovered
fuel costs as of June 30, 2005 totaled $127.4 million as compared to $101.6 million at December 31,
2004. Alabama Power increased its fuel billing factor in April 2005. Alabama Power will continue
to monitor the under-recovered fuel cost balance to determine if an additional adjustment to
billing rates should be requested from the Alabama PSC. See Note 3 to the financial statements of
Southern Company under Alabama Power Retail Regulatory Matters in Item 8 of the Form 10-K and
Note (I) to the Condensed Financial Statements herein for additional information.
On May 17, 2005, the Georgia PSC voted to allow Georgia Power to increase customer fuel rates
to recover estimated under-recovered fuel costs of approximately $508 million as of May 31, 2005
over the period from June 1, 2005 through May 31, 2009, as well as future projected fuel costs
based on a June 2005 through May 2006 test period. The new fuel rate became effective June 1, 2005
and represents an average annual increase in revenues of approximately 9.5%, or approximately $473
million. Based on the order, a portion of the under-recovered regulatory clause revenues was
reclassified from current to long-term on the balance sheet. At June 30, 2005, Georgia Powers
under-recovered fuel costs totaled $516 million, of which $363 million is classified as long-term.
See Note 3 to the financial statements of Southern Company under Georgia Power Retail Rate
Activity in Item 8 of the Form 10-K and Note (J) to the Condensed Financial Statements herein for
additional information.
Storm Damage Cost Recovery
See MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL FERC and State PSC Matters
- Storm Damage Cost Recovery of Southern Company in Item 7 and Notes 1 and 3 to the financial
statements of Southern Company under Storm Damage Reserves and Gulf Power and Alabama Power
Storm Damage Recovery, respectively, in Item 8 of the Form 10-K. Each retail operating company
maintains a reserve for property damage to cover the cost of damages from major storms to its
transmission and distribution lines and the cost of uninsured damages to its generation facilities
and other property.
19
THE SOUTHERN COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Hurricane Ivan hit Gulf Powers service territory in September 2004. In March 2005, the
Florida PSC approved a Stipulation and Settlement between Gulf Power, the Office of Public Counsel
for the State of Florida, and the Florida Industrial Power Users Group which allows Gulf Power to
recover the retail portion of $51.7 million, the projected reserve deficiency, plus interest and
revenue taxes, from customers over a 24-month period beginning in April 2005. In connection with
the Stipulation, Gulf Power has agreed that it will not seek any additional increase in its base
rates and charges to become effective on or before March 1, 2007.
On July 10, 2005, Hurricane Dennis hit Gulf Powers service territory. Approximately 242,000,
or 60%, of Gulf Powers customers were without electrical service immediately after the hurricane
struck. More than 98% of those without power had service restored in six days. Based on current
projections, retail sales revenues lost as a result of power outages from Hurricane Dennis are not
expected to have a material impact on the net income of Gulf Power. Gulf Power maintains an
accumulated provision for property damage to cover the cost of damages from major storms and other
uninsured damages to its property. Due to the damages incurred in 2004 related to Hurricane Ivan
(Ivan), the accumulated reserve had a deficit balance of $42 million at June 30, 2005, including
the Ivan deficit. The Ivan deficit at June 30, 2005 was $44.4 million, which is currently being
recovered from retail customers through a surcharge on the customers bill over a two-year recovery
period. The current preliminary estimate of Hurricane Dennis restoration costs are approximately
$60 million. The established policy of the Florida PSC, as recently reaffirmed by its decisions
following the 2004 hurricane experience of Floridas investor owned electric utilities, provides
for recovery of these costs through the mechanism of the property insurance reserve and, where
necessary, through a special recovery surcharge. In 2005, the Florida legislature authorized
securitized financing as an additional mechanism available to the Florida PSC and electric
utilities in Florida for addressing the extraordinary costs associated with hurricanes.
Based upon the additional costs related to Hurricane Dennis, this option, along with other
alternatives, is being evaluated to allow a more rapid recovery of these costs. See Note (K) to
the Condensed Financial Statements herein for additional information.
Hurricane Dennis also impacted the Gulf Coast of Alabama and continued north through the state
of Alabama, causing significant damage in parts of the service territory of Alabama Power.
Approximately 241,000 of Alabama Powers 1,390,000 customer accounts were without electrical
service immediately after the hurricane. The total operation and maintenance costs associated with
repairing the damage to facilities and restoring service to customers are preliminarily estimated
to be approximately $30 million. The June 30, 2005 balance of $4.2 million in the natural disaster
reserve is not sufficient to cover these costs. Alabama Power has requested clarification from the
Alabama PSC concerning an October 2004 order that allows the natural disaster reserve to carry a
negative balance and to defer such costs for recovery in future periods to be determined by the
Alabama PSC. If this request is not approved, Alabama Power would be required to expense the costs
in excess of the reserve balance in the third quarter of 2005. See Note (I) to the Condensed
Financial Statements herein for additional information.
Mirant Related Matters
See MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL Other Matters of Southern
Company in Item 7 and Note 3 to the financial statements of Southern Company under Mirant Related
Matters in Item 8 of the Form 10-K and Note (B) to the Condensed Financial Statements herein under
Mirant Related Matters. In July 2003, Mirant filed for voluntary reorganization under Chapter
11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. In June 2004, Mirants bankruptcy counsel notified Southern
Company that it was investigating, on behalf of a committee of independent Mirant directors,
potential claims against Southern Company.
In June 2005, Mirant, as a debtor in possession, and The Official Committee of Unsecured
Creditors of Mirant Corporation filed a complaint against Southern Company in the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the Northern District of Texas and filed an amended complaint on July 6, 2005.
The complaint alleges that Southern
20
THE SOUTHERN COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Company
caused Mirant to engage in certain fraudulent transfers and to pay illegal dividends to Southern
Company in 1999 and 2000 with actual intent to hinder, delay or defraud creditors or,
alternatively, when Southern Company knew or should have known that Mirant was allegedly insolvent,
undercapitalized or unable to pay its debts. The alleged fraudulent transfers and/or illegal
dividends include: (1) certain dividends from Mirant to Southern Company in the aggregate amount of
$668 million, (2) the repayment of certain intercompany loans and accrued interest in an aggregate
amount of $1.035 billion, and (3) the dividend distribution of one share of Series B Preferred
Stock and its subsequent redemption in exchange for Mirants 80% interest in a holding company
which owned SE Finance Capital Corporation and Southern Company Capital Funding, Inc., which
transfer Mirant asserts is valued at $247.9 million. The complaint also seeks to recharacterize
certain advances from Southern Company to Mirant for investments in energy facilities from debt to
equity. The complaint further alleges that Southern Company is liable to Mirants creditors for
the full amount of Mirants liability under an alter ego theory of liability and that Southern
Company caused Mirant to breach its fiduciary duty of loyalty to its creditors. The complaint
seeks monetary damages in excess of $2 billion plus interest, punitive damages, attorneys fees, and
costs. Finally, Mirant objects to Southern Companys claims against Mirant in the Bankruptcy Court
(which, in the aggregate, currently total approximately $70 million) and seeks equitable
subordination of Southern Companys claims to the claims of all other creditors. Southern Company
believes there is no meritorious basis for Mirants claims and intends to vigorously defend itself
in this action.
On July 13, 2005, The Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of Mirant Corporation, on
behalf of Mirant, as a debtor in possession, and its creditors, filed a complaint in the Bankruptcy
Court against certain former officers and directors of Mirant and/or Southern Company. The
complaint alleges that the defendants breached their fiduciary duties of loyalty and care owed to
Mirant and its creditors by allowing Mirant to overpay for certain acquisitions of utility assets
in 1997, 1998, and 1999, and by authorizing or participating in certain transfers from Mirant to
Southern Company in 1999 and 2000 as described above when Mirant was allegedly insolvent,
undercapitalized, or unable to pay its debts. Specifically, the complaint alleges that the
defendants lacked independence in judgment and failed to act in the best interest of Mirant and its
creditors when they authorized or participated in these acquisitions and transfers. The complaint
seeks to recover damages in excess of $1.9 billion for such transfers. Under certain
circumstances, Southern Company may be obligated under its Bylaws to indemnify the individuals
named as defendants in the complaint.
The ultimate outcome of these matters cannot be determined at this time.
Southern Company has various other contingent liabilities associated with Mirant, including
guarantees of contractual commitments, litigation, and joint and several liabilities in connection
with the consolidated federal income tax return. The ultimate outcome of such contingent
liabilities cannot now be determined.
Income Tax Matters
Leveraged Lease Transactions
See MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL Income Tax Matters -
Leveraged Lease Transactions of Southern Company in Item 7 and Note 3 to the financial statements
of Southern Company under Income Tax Matters Leveraged Lease Transactions in Item 8 of the Form
10-K and Note (B) to the Condensed Financial Statements herein under Income Tax Matters for
information regarding IRS challenges to Southern Companys transactions related to international
leveraged leases that could have material impacts on Southern Companys financial statements. The
ultimate outcome of these matters cannot now be determined.
21
THE SOUTHERN COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Synthetic Fuel Tax Credits
As
discussed in Note 3 to the financial statements of Southern Company
under Income Tax Matters
Synthetic Fuel Tax Credits in Item 8 of the Form 10-K, Southern Company has investments in two
entities that produce synthetic fuel and receive tax credits under Section 29 of the IRC. In
accordance with Section 29 of the IRC, these tax credits are subject to limitation as the annual
average price of oil (as determined by the DOE) increases over a specified, inflation-adjusted
dollar amount published in the spring of the subsequent year. Southern Company, along with its
partners in these investments, will continue to monitor oil prices. Any indicated potential
limitation on these credits could affect either the timing or the amount of the credit recognition
and could also require an impairment analysis of these investments by Southern Company. In April
2005, Southern Company entered into a derivative transaction designed to reduce its exposure to the
potential phase-out of these credits in 2005. The purchased option, which had an initial fair
value of approximately $7 million, is being marked to market over the remainder of the year through
other income (expense), net. See Note (F) to the Condensed Financial Statements herein for
additional information.
Other Matters
On June 7, 2005, Southern Power, through certain of its wholly-owned subsidiaries, acquired all of
the outstanding general and limited partnership interests of Oleander from Constellation Power,
Inc. and certain other subsidiaries of Constellation Energy Group, Inc. Southern Powers
acquisition of the general and limited partnership interests in Oleander was pursuant to a Purchase
and Sale Agreement dated April 8, 2005, for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $206
million, plus approximately $12 million of working capital and other adjustments. The purchase was
for a dual-fueled generating plant in Brevard County, Florida with a nominal installed capacity of
680 MW. The entire output of the plant is sold under separate PPAs with Florida Power & Light
Company and Seminole Electric Cooperative, Inc. The PPAs expire in 2007 and 2009, respectively.
In
July 2005, the U.S. Congress passed the Energy Policy Act of
2005 (Energy Act), which President Bush is expected to sign into law
in early August 2005. Among other things, the Energy Act
includes various tax subsidies for electric utilities and provisions
repealing the PUHCA. The Energy Act also amends federal energy laws
and provides the FERC with new oversight responsibilities for the
electric utility industry. The implementation of the Energy Act
requires proceedings at the state level and the development of
regulations by the FERC, as well as other federal agencies. Southern
Company is still reviewing the legislation; however, its impacts will
depend on the promulgation and implementation of final rules and
cannot be determined at this time.
Southern Company is subject to certain claims and legal actions arising in the ordinary course
of business. In addition, Southern Companys business activities are subject to extensive
governmental regulation related to public health and the environment. Litigation over
environmental issues and claims of various types, including property damage, personal injury, and
citizen enforcement of environmental requirements, has increased generally throughout the United
States. In particular, personal injury claims for damages caused by alleged exposure to hazardous
materials have become more frequent. The ultimate outcome of such litigation against Southern
Company and its subsidiaries cannot be predicted at this time; however, management does not
anticipate that the liabilities, if any, arising from such current proceedings would have a
material adverse effect on Southern Companys financial statements.
See the Notes to the Condensed Financial Statements herein for discussion of various
contingencies and other matters which may affect future earnings potential.
ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Application of Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Southern Company prepares its consolidated financial statements in accordance with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States. Significant accounting policies are
described in Note 1 to the financial
statements of Southern Company in Item 8 of the Form 10-K. In the application of these
policies,
22
THE SOUTHERN COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
certain estimates are made that may have a material impact on Southern Companys
results of operations and related disclosures. Different assumptions and measurements could
produce estimates that are significantly different from those recorded in the financial
statements. Also see MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS ACCOUNTING POLICIES Application
of Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates of Southern Company in Item 7 of the Form 10-K
for a complete discussion of Southern Companys critical accounting policies and estimates
related to Electric Utility Regulation, Contingent Obligations, and Unbilled Revenues.
New Accounting Standards
FASB Statement No. 123R, Share-Based Payments, was issued in December 2004. This statement
requires that compensation cost relating to share-based payment transactions be recognized in
financial statements. That cost will be measured based on the grant date fair value of the
equity instruments issued. In April 2005, the SEC amended the compliance dates for FASB
Statement No. 123R. For Southern Company, this statement is now effective beginning January 1,
2006. Although the compensation expense calculation required under the revised statement differs
slightly, the impacts on Southern Companys financial statements are expected to be similar to
the pro forma disclosures included in Note 1 to the financial statements of Southern Company
under Stock Options in Item 8 of the Form 10-K and in Note (C) to the Condensed Financial
Statements herein.
FASB Interpretation No. 47 (FIN 47), Accounting for Conditional Asset Retirement Obligations,
was issued in March 2005. This interpretation requires that asset retirement obligations be
recorded when a legal obligation exists even though the timing and/or the method of settlement are
conditional on a future event. For Southern Company, FIN 47 is effective no later than December
31, 2005. Southern Company is currently assessing the impact of FIN 47 on its balance sheet;
however, adoption is not currently expected to have a material impact on Southern Companys income
statement.
In December 2004, the FASB issued Staff Position No. 109-1 (FSP 109-1), Application of FASB
Statement No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes, to the Tax Deduction on Qualified Production
Activities provided by the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004, which requires that the generation
deduction for utilities be accounted for as a special tax deduction rather than as a tax rate
reduction. Southern Company adopted FSP 109-1 in the first quarter of 2005 with no material impact
on its financial statements.
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND LIQUIDITY
Overview
Southern Companys financial condition continued to be strong at June 30, 2005. Net cash flow
from operating activities totaled $792 million for first six months of 2005, compared to $901
million for the corresponding period in 2004. The $109 million decrease in 2005 resulted
primarily from higher fuel costs at the retail operating companies. Those costs are recoverable
in future periods and are reflected on the balance sheets as under recovered regulatory clause
revenues. Gross property additions to utility plant were $1.2 billion in the first six months
of 2005. The majority of funds needed for gross property additions since 2000 has been provided
from operating activities.
Significant balance sheet changes include a $240 million increase in long-term debt for the
first half of 2005 due to the replacement of short-term financing with long-term debt, consistent
with Southern Companys finance policy, and an increase of $534 million in property, plant, and
equipment.
The market price of Southern Companys common stock at June 30, 2005 was $34.67 per share and
the book value was $14.13 per share, representing a market-to-book ratio of 245%, compared to
$33.52, $13.86, and
242%, respectively, at the end of 2004. The dividend for the second quarter 2005 was $0.3725 per
share compared to $0.35 per share in the second quarter 2004.
23
THE SOUTHERN COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The retail operating companies, Southern Power, and SCS have each maintained investment grade
ratings from the major rating agencies.
Capital Requirements and Contractual Obligations
See MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS FINANCIAL CONDITION AND LIQUIDITY Capital Requirements
and Contractual Obligations of Southern Company in Item 7 of the Form 10-K for a description of
Southern Companys capital requirements for its construction program and other funding requirements
associated with scheduled maturities of long-term debt, as well as the related interest, preferred
stock dividends, leases, trust funding requirements, and other purchase commitments. Approximately
$1.2 billion will be required by June 30, 2006 for redemptions and maturities of long-term debt.
Sources of Capital
Southern Company intends to meet its future capital needs through internal cash flow and external
security issuances. The amounts and timing of additional equity capital to be raised will be
contingent on Southern Companys investment opportunities. The retail operating companies and
Southern Power plan to obtain the
funds required for construction and other purposes from sources similar to those used in the past,
which were primarily from operating cash flows, security issuances, and term loan and short-term
borrowings. However, the amount, type, and timing of any financings, if needed, will
depend upon market conditions and regulatory approval. See MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND LIQUIDITY Sources of Capital of Southern Company in Item 7 of the Form
10-K for additional information.
To meet short term cash needs and contingencies, the Southern Company system had at June 30,
2005 approximately $237 million of cash and cash equivalents and approximately $3.1 billion of
unused credit arrangements with banks, of which $238 million
expire in 2005 and $2.8 billion expire
in 2006 and beyond. Of the facilities maturing in 2005 and 2006, $168 million contain provisions
allowing two-year term loans executable at the expiration date and $275 million contain provisions
allowing one-year term loans executable at the expiration date. These unused credit arrangements
also provide liquidity support to variable rate pollution control bonds and commercial paper
programs. Southern Company expects to renew its credit facilities, as needed, prior to
expiration. The retail operating companies may also meet short-term cash needs through a Southern
Company subsidiary organized to issue and sell commercial paper and extendible commercial notes at
the request and for the benefit of each of the retail operating companies. At June 30, 2005, the
Southern Company system had outstanding commercial paper of $893.1 million and extendible
commercial notes of $24.3 million. Management believes that the need for working capital can be
adequately met by utilizing commercial paper programs and lines of credit without maintaining large
cash balances.
Off-Balance Sheet Financing Arrangements
See MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS FINANCIAL CONDITION AND LIQUIDITY Off-Balance Sheet
Financing Arrangements of Southern Company in Item 7 and Note 7 to the financial statements of
Southern Company under Operating Leases in Item 8 of the Form 10-K for information related to
Mississippi Powers lease of a combined cycle generating facility at Plant Daniel.
Credit Rating Risk
Southern Company does not have any credit arrangements that would require material changes in
payment schedules or terminations as a result of a credit rating downgrade. There are certain
contracts that could require
collateral, but not accelerated payment, in the event of a credit rating change to BBB- or Baa3
or below. These contracts are primarily for physical electricity purchases and sales. At June
30, 2005, the
24
THE SOUTHERN COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
maximum potential collateral requirements at a BBB- or Baa3 rating were
approximately $51.8 million. The maximum potential collateral requirements at a rating below
BBB- or Baa3 were approximately $353.8 million. In addition, through the acquisition of
Oleander, Southern Power assumed a PPA with Seminole Electric Cooperative, Inc. that could
require collateral, but not accelerated payment, in the event of a credit rating change to BBB-
or Baa3 or below. The amount of this collateral cannot be determined at this time. Generally,
collateral may be provided for by a Southern Company guaranty, letter of credit, or cash.
Southern Company is also party to certain derivative agreements that could require collateral
and/or accelerated payment in the event of a credit rating change to below investment grade.
These agreements are primarily for natural gas price and interest rate risk management
activities. At June 30, 2005, Southern Company and its subsidiaries had no material exposure
under these contracts.
Market Price Risk
Southern Companys market risk exposures relative to interest rate changes have not changed
materially compared with the December 31, 2004 reporting period. In addition, Southern Company is
not aware of any facts or circumstances that would significantly affect such exposures in the near
term.
Due to cost-based rate regulations, the retail operating companies have limited exposure to
market volatility in interest rates, commodity fuel prices, and prices of electricity. In
addition, Southern Powers exposure to market volatility in commodity fuel prices and prices of
electricity is limited because its long-term sales contracts shift substantially all fuel cost
responsibility to the purchaser. To mitigate residual risks relative to movements in
electricity prices, the retail operating companies and Southern Power enter into fixed-price
contracts for the purchase and sale of electricity through the wholesale electricity market and,
to a lesser extent, into similar contracts for gas purchases. The retail operating companies
have implemented fuel hedging programs at the instruction of their respective state PSCs.
Southern Company GAS also has in place a risk management program to substantially mitigate its
exposure to price volatility for its natural gas purchases.
The fair value of derivative energy contracts at June 30, 2005 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second Quarter |
|
|
|
|
2005 |
|
Year-to-Date |
|
|
Changes |
|
Changes |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
(in millions) |
Contracts beginning of period |
|
$ |
119.5 |
|
|
$ |
10.5 |
|
Contracts realized or settled |
|
|
(45.1 |
) |
|
|
(35.1 |
) |
New contracts at inception |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in valuation techniques |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current period changes (a) |
|
|
(10.4 |
) |
|
|
88.6 |
|
|
Contracts at June 30, 2005 |
|
$ |
64.0 |
|
|
$ |
64.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Current period changes also include the changes in fair value of new contracts entered
into during the period. |
25
THE SOUTHERN COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Source of June 30, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valuation Prices |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
Maturity |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
Year 1 |
|
13 Years |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
|
|
|
Actively quoted |
|
$ |
64.9 |
|
|
$ |
40.1 |
|
|
$ |
24.8 |
|
External sources |
|
|
(0.9 |
) |
|
|
(0.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Models and other methods |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contracts at June 30, 2005 |
|
$ |
64.0 |
|
|
$ |
39.2 |
|
|
$ |
24.8 |
|
|
For additional information, see MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
LIQUIDITY Market Price Risk of Southern Company in Item 7 and Notes 1 and 6 to the financial
statements of Southern Company under Financial Instruments in Item 8 of the Form 10-K and Note
(F) to the Condensed Financial Statements herein.
Financing Activities
In the first six months of 2005, Southern Company and its subsidiaries issued $655 million of
senior notes and $149 million of common stock through employee and director stock plans and
incurred obligations in connection with the issuance of $185 million of pollution control revenue
bonds. The proceeds were primarily used to refund senior notes, obligations incurred in connection
with pollution control revenue bonds, and other long-term debt and to fund ongoing construction
projects. The remainder was used to repay short-term indebtedness. See Southern Companys
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows herein for further details on financing activities
during the first six months of 2005.
In June 2005, Southern Company started repurchasing shares of stock to offset issuances under
the Southern Companys stock compensation plans. The total number of shares repurchased during the
first six months of 2005 was 1.8 million at a cost of $62.3 million.
In addition to any financings that may be necessary to meet capital requirements and
contractual obligations, Southern Company and its subsidiaries plan to continue, when economically
feasible, a program to retire higher-cost securities and replace these obligations with lower-cost
capital if market conditions permit.
26
PART I
Item 3. Quantitative And Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.
See MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS FINANCIAL CONDITION AND LIQUIDITY Market Price Risk
herein for each registrant and Notes 1 and 6 to the financial statements of each registrant under
Financial Instruments in Item 8 of the Form 10-K. Also, see Note (F) to the Condensed Financial
Statements herein for information relating to derivative instruments.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures.
(a) Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures.
As of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report, Southern Company, the retail
operating companies, and Southern Power conducted separate evaluations under the supervision and
with the participation of each companys management, including the Chief Executive Officer and the
Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Sections 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934). Based upon these evaluations, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial
Officer, in each case, concluded that the disclosure controls and procedures are effective in
alerting them in a timely manner to material information relating to their company (including its
consolidated subsidiaries, if any) required to be included in periodic filings with the SEC.
(b) Changes in internal controls.
There have been no changes in Southern Companys, the retail operating companies, or Southern
Powers internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and
15d-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) during the second quarter of 2005 that have
materially affected or are reasonably likely to materially affect Southern Companys, the retail
operating companies, or Southern Powers internal control over financial reporting.
27
ALABAMA POWER COMPANY
CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF INCOME (UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months |
|
|
For the Six Months |
|
|
|
Ended June 30, |
|
|
Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Operating Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retail revenues |
|
$ |
863,155 |
|
|
$ |
847,148 |
|
|
$ |
1,572,241 |
|
|
$ |
1,591,781 |
|
Sales for resale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-affiliates |
|
|
130,598 |
|
|
|
120,491 |
|
|
|
245,012 |
|
|
|
232,436 |
|
Affiliates |
|
|
47,934 |
|
|
|
53,945 |
|
|
|
155,220 |
|
|
|
119,733 |
|
Other revenues |
|
|
44,152 |
|
|
|
37,233 |
|
|
|
83,102 |
|
|
|
74,561 |
|
Total operating revenues |
|
|
1,085,839 |
|
|
|
1,058,817 |
|
|
|
2,055,575 |
|
|
|
2,018,511 |
|
Operating Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fuel |
|
|
323,328 |
|
|
|
277,110 |
|
|
|
623,148 |
|
|
|
549,089 |
|
Purchased power |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-affiliates |
|
|
34,316 |
|
|
|
65,508 |
|
|
|
58,182 |
|
|
|
94,150 |
|
Affiliates |
|
|
61,487 |
|
|
|
60,400 |
|
|
|
109,785 |
|
|
|
120,332 |
|
Other operations |
|
|
168,987 |
|
|
|
160,889 |
|
|
|
315,277 |
|
|
|
307,275 |
|
Maintenance |
|
|
80,858 |
|
|
|
90,718 |
|
|
|
204,412 |
|
|
|
171,105 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
101,019 |
|
|
|
106,146 |
|
|
|
209,510 |
|
|
|
211,499 |
|
Taxes other than income taxes |
|
|
62,985 |
|
|
|
59,328 |
|
|
|
125,534 |
|
|
|
123,775 |
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
832,980 |
|
|
|
820,099 |
|
|
|
1,645,848 |
|
|
|
1,577,225 |
|
Operating Income |
|
|
252,859 |
|
|
|
238,718 |
|
|
|
409,727 |
|
|
|
441,286 |
|
Other Income and (Expense): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for equity funds used during construction |
|
|
4,785 |
|
|
|
3,914 |
|
|
|
10,439 |
|
|
|
8,024 |
|
Interest income |
|
|
4,001 |
|
|
|
3,890 |
|
|
|
7,569 |
|
|
|
8,329 |
|
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized |
|
|
(50,415 |
) |
|
|
(52,367 |
) |
|
|
(96,722 |
) |
|
|
(102,446 |
) |
Interest expense to affiliate trusts |
|
|
(4,060 |
) |
|
|
(4,181 |
) |
|
|
(8,119 |
) |
|
|
(4,181 |
) |
Distributions on mandatorily redeemable preferred securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,938 |
) |
Other income (expense), net |
|
|
(1,032 |
) |
|
|
(6,415 |
) |
|
|
(3,837 |
) |
|
|
(10,753 |
) |
Total other income and (expense) |
|
|
(46,721 |
) |
|
|
(55,159 |
) |
|
|
(90,670 |
) |
|
|
(104,965 |
) |
Earnings Before Income Taxes |
|
|
206,138 |
|
|
|
183,559 |
|
|
|
319,057 |
|
|
|
336,321 |
|
Income taxes |
|
|
78,573 |
|
|
|
72,567 |
|
|
|
92,018 |
|
|
|
129,835 |
|
Net Income |
|
|
127,565 |
|
|
|
110,992 |
|
|
|
227,039 |
|
|
|
206,486 |
|
Dividends on Preferred Stock |
|
|
6,072 |
|
|
|
6,705 |
|
|
|
12,144 |
|
|
|
11,452 |
|
Net Income After Dividends on Preferred Stock |
|
$ |
121,493 |
|
|
$ |
104,287 |
|
|
$ |
214,895 |
|
|
$ |
195,034 |
|
CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months |
|
|
For the Six Months |
|
|
|
Ended June 30, |
|
|
Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Net Income After Dividends on Preferred Stock |
|
$ |
121,493 |
|
|
$ |
104,287 |
|
|
$ |
214,895 |
|
|
$ |
195,034 |
|
Other comprehensive income (loss): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in fair value of marketable securities, net of tax
of $285 and $285, respectively |
|
|
|
|
|
|
470 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
470 |
|
Changes in fair value of qualifying hedges, net of tax
of $(4,490), $11,847, $(5,203) and $5,685, respectively |
|
|
(7,386 |
) |
|
|
19,486 |
|
|
|
(8,558 |
) |
|
|
9,350 |
|
Reclassification adjustment for amounts included in net income,
net of tax of $(347), $718, $(281) and $1,572,
respectively |
|
|
(569 |
) |
|
|
1,180 |
|
|
|
(461 |
) |
|
|
2,585 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME |
|
$ |
113,538 |
|
|
$ |
125,423 |
|
|
$ |
205,876 |
|
|
$ |
207,439 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes as they relate to Alabama Power are an integral part of these condensed financial statements.
29
ALABAMA POWER COMPANY
CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Six Months |
|
|
|
Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Operating Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
227,039 |
|
|
$ |
206,486 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income
to net cash provided from operating activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
247,403 |
|
|
|
239,039 |
|
Deferred income taxes and investment tax credits, net |
|
|
17,335 |
|
|
|
85,355 |
|
Deferred revenues |
|
|
(6,689 |
) |
|
|
(5,552 |
) |
Allowance for equity funds used during construction |
|
|
(10,439 |
) |
|
|
(8,024 |
) |
Pension, postretirement, and other employee benefits |
|
|
(1,769 |
) |
|
|
(19,862 |
) |
Tax benefit of stock options |
|
|
13,373 |
|
|
|
5,419 |
|
Hedge settlements |
|
|
(21,445 |
) |
|
|
5,548 |
|
Natural disaster reserve accounting order |
|
|
45,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other, net |
|
|
(22,001 |
) |
|
|
(28,587 |
) |
Changes in certain current assets and liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables, net |
|
|
(58,981 |
) |
|
|
(105,447 |
) |
Fossil fuel stock |
|
|
(59,524 |
) |
|
|
(1,631 |
) |
Materials and supplies |
|
|
(8,228 |
) |
|
|
(3,800 |
) |
Other current assets |
|
|
7,598 |
|
|
|
11,088 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
(73,305 |
) |
|
|
(105,485 |
) |
Accrued taxes |
|
|
(11,344 |
) |
|
|
33,647 |
|
Accrued compensation |
|
|
(29,589 |
) |
|
|
(32,216 |
) |
Other current liabilities |
|
|
26,527 |
|
|
|
15,875 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided from operating activities |
|
|
280,961 |
|
|
|
291,853 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross property additions |
|
|
(379,655 |
) |
|
|
(376,205 |
) |
Cost of removal net of salvage |
|
|
(25,453 |
) |
|
|
(18,743 |
) |
Other |
|
|
9,041 |
|
|
|
14,567 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used for investing activities |
|
|
(396,067 |
) |
|
|
(380,381 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in notes payable, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
45,978 |
|
Proceeds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior notes |
|
|
250,000 |
|
|
|
350,000 |
|
Preferred stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
100,000 |
|
Common stock |
|
|
40,000 |
|
|
|
20,000 |
|
Redemptions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior notes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(200,000 |
) |
Other long-term debt |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(1,443 |
) |
Payment of preferred stock dividends |
|
|
(10,815 |
) |
|
|
(9,274 |
) |
Payment of common stock dividends |
|
|
(204,950 |
) |
|
|
(218,650 |
) |
Other |
|
|
(2,438 |
) |
|
|
(13,035 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided from financing activities |
|
|
71,793 |
|
|
|
73,576 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Change in Cash and Cash Equivalents |
|
|
(43,313 |
) |
|
|
(14,952 |
) |
Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Period |
|
|
84,461 |
|
|
|
42,752 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Period |
|
$ |
41,148 |
|
|
$ |
27,800 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental Cash Flow Information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid during the period for |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest (net of $4,133 and $3,343 capitalized for 2005 and 2004, respectively) |
|
$ |
81,932 |
|
|
$ |
81,471 |
|
Income taxes (net of refunds) |
|
$ |
84,604 |
|
|
$ |
9,554 |
|
The accompanying notes as they relate to Alabama Power are an integral part of these condensed financial statements.
30
ALABAMA POWER COMPANY
CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS (UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At June 30, |
|
|
At December 31, |
|
Assets |
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Current Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
41,148 |
|
|
$ |
84,461 |
|
Receivables |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer accounts receivable |
|
|
267,864 |
|
|
|
235,221 |
|
Unbilled revenues |
|
|
109,008 |
|
|
|
96,486 |
|
Under recovered regulatory clause revenues |
|
|
134,705 |
|
|
|
119,773 |
|
Other accounts and notes receivable |
|
|
45,479 |
|
|
|
52,145 |
|
Affiliated companies |
|
|
49,064 |
|
|
|
61,149 |
|
Accumulated provision for uncollectible accounts |
|
|
(6,975 |
) |
|
|
(5,404 |
) |
Fossil fuel stock, at average cost |
|
|
117,312 |
|
|
|
57,787 |
|
Vacation pay |
|
|
36,494 |
|
|
|
36,494 |
|
Materials and supplies, at average cost |
|
|
246,147 |
|
|
|
237,919 |
|
Prepaid expenses |
|
|
56,400 |
|
|
|
61,897 |
|
Other |
|
|
25,424 |
|
|
|
16,283 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
1,122,070 |
|
|
|
1,054,211 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, Plant, and Equipment: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In service |
|
|
15,054,722 |
|
|
|
14,636,168 |
|
Less accumulated provision for depreciation |
|
|
5,218,991 |
|
|
|
5,097,930 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,835,731 |
|
|
|
9,538,238 |
|
Nuclear fuel, at amortized cost |
|
|
82,968 |
|
|
|
93,388 |
|
Construction work in progress |
|
|
347,683 |
|
|
|
470,844 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total property, plant, and equipment |
|
|
10,266,382 |
|
|
|
10,102,470 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Property and Investments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity investments in unconsolidated subsidiaries |
|
|
45,278 |
|
|
|
45,455 |
|
Nuclear decommissioning trusts, at fair value |
|
|
453,365 |
|
|
|
445,634 |
|
Other |
|
|
35,451 |
|
|
|
36,192 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other property and investments |
|
|
534,094 |
|
|
|
527,281 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred Charges and Other Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred charges related to income taxes |
|
|
329,514 |
|
|
|
316,528 |
|
Prepaid pension costs |
|
|
501,005 |
|
|
|
489,193 |
|
Unamortized debt issuance expense |
|
|
28,797 |
|
|
|
28,392 |
|
Unamortized loss on reacquired debt |
|
|
105,300 |
|
|
|
109,403 |
|
Other regulatory assets |
|
|
9,045 |
|
|
|
47,811 |
|
Other |
|
|
112,402 |
|
|
|
108,170 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred charges and other assets |
|
|
1,086,063 |
|
|
|
1,099,497 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets |
|
$ |
13,008,609 |
|
|
$ |
12,783,459 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes as they relate to Alabama Power are an integral part of these condensed financial statements.
31
ALABAMA POWER COMPANY
CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS (UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At June 30, |
|
|
At December 31, |
|
Liabilities and Stockholder's Equity |
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Current Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities due within one year |
|
$ |
421,505 |
|
|
$ |
225,005 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Affiliated |
|
|
122,269 |
|
|
|
141,096 |
|
Other |
|
|
123,095 |
|
|
|
198,834 |
|
Customer deposits |
|
|
52,671 |
|
|
|
49,598 |
|
Accrued taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes |
|
|
39,313 |
|
|
|
28,498 |
|
Other |
|
|
72,876 |
|
|
|
29,688 |
|
Accrued interest |
|
|
46,744 |
|
|
|
40,029 |
|
Accrued vacation pay |
|
|
36,494 |
|
|
|
36,494 |
|
Accrued compensation |
|
|
47,269 |
|
|
|
76,858 |
|
Other |
|
|
63,254 |
|
|
|
34,290 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
1,025,490 |
|
|
|
860,390 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term Debt |
|
|
3,909,298 |
|
|
|
3,855,257 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term Debt Payable to Affiliated Trusts |
|
|
309,279 |
|
|
|
309,279 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred Credits and Other Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated deferred income taxes |
|
|
1,881,285 |
|
|
|
1,885,120 |
|
Deferred credits related to income taxes |
|
|
111,720 |
|
|
|
148,395 |
|
Accumulated deferred investment tax credits |
|
|
200,604 |
|
|
|
205,353 |
|
Employee benefit obligations |
|
|
204,881 |
|
|
|
194,837 |
|
Deferred capacity revenues |
|
|
18,367 |
|
|
|
25,056 |
|
Asset retirement obligations |
|
|
396,172 |
|
|
|
383,621 |
|
Asset retirement obligation regulatory liability |
|
|
152,915 |
|
|
|
159,230 |
|
Other cost of removal obligations |
|
|
602,752 |
|
|
|
597,147 |
|
Miscellaneous regulatory liabilities |
|
|
50,032 |
|
|
|
47,535 |
|
Other |
|
|
16,166 |
|
|
|
36,988 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred credits and other liabilities |
|
|
3,634,894 |
|
|
|
3,683,282 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities |
|
|
8,878,961 |
|
|
|
8,708,208 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred Stock |
|
|
465,046 |
|
|
|
465,047 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stockholders Equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, par value $40 per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Authorized - 15,000,000 shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding - 9,250,000 shares |
|
|
370,000 |
|
|
|
330,000 |
|
Paid-in capital |
|
|
1,968,556 |
|
|
|
1,955,183 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
1,351,093 |
|
|
|
1,341,049 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
|
(25,047 |
) |
|
|
(16,028 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total common stockholders equity |
|
|
3,664,602 |
|
|
|
3,610,204 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities and Stockholders Equity |
|
$ |
13,008,609 |
|
|
$ |
12,783,459 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
accompanying notes as they relate to Alabama Power are an integral part of these condensed financial
statements.
32
ALABAMA POWER COMPANY
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
SECOND QUARTER 2005 vs. SECOND QUARTER 2004
AND
YEAR-TO-DATE 2005 vs. YEAR-TO-DATE 2004
OVERVIEW
Discussion of the results of operations is focused on Alabama Powers business of electricity sales
to retail customers within its traditional service area located within the State of Alabama and to
wholesale customers in the Southeast. Many factors affect the opportunities, challenges, and risks
of Alabama Powers business of selling electricity. These factors include the ability to maintain
a stable regulatory environment, to achieve energy sales growth while containing costs, and to
recover costs related to growing demand and increasingly stringent environmental standards.
Alabama Power continues to focus on several key performance indicators. These indicators
include customer satisfaction, peak season equivalent forced outage rate and return on equity. For
additional information on these indicators, see MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OVERVIEW
Key Performance Indicators of Alabama Power in Item 7 of the Form 10-K.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Alabama Powers net income after dividends on preferred stock for the second quarter and
year-to-date 2005 was $121.5 million and $214.9 million, respectively, compared to $104.3 million
and $195.0 million, respectively, for the corresponding periods of 2004. Earnings in the second
quarter 2005 increased by $17.2 million, or 16.5%, and earnings year-to-date 2005 increased by
$19.9 million, or 10.2%, respectively. Though these amounts were partially offset by mild weather,
these increases were primarily due to the continued strength of industrial revenues, additional
transmission revenues, and a 1% increase in retail rates that took effect January 1, 2005 under
Alabama Powers new environmental rate order approved by the Alabama PSC. Additionally, Alabama
Power experienced lower maintenance costs (exclusive of storm provision made in the first quarter
2005; see Maintenance expense below) and ceased its nuclear decommissioning expense accrual in
accordance with an Alabama PSC order in June 2005. See Nuclear Relicensing herein and Note 3 to
the financials statements of Alabama Power under Retail Regulatory Matters in Item 8 of the Form
10-K for additional information on nuclear decommissioning expense and Alabama Powers rates,
respectively.
33
ALABAMA POWER COMPANY
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Significant income statement items appropriate for discussion include the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (Decrease) |
|
|
|
Second Quarter |
|
|
Year-To-Date |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
% |
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
% |
|
Retail revenues |
|
$ |
16,007 |
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
$ |
(19,540 |
) |
|
|
(1.2 |
) |
Sales for resale-non-affiliates |
|
|
10,107 |
|
|
|
8.4 |
|
|
|
12,576 |
|
|
|
5.4 |
|
Sales for resale-affiliates |
|
|
(6,011 |
) |
|
|
(11.1 |
) |
|
|
35,487 |
|
|
|
29.6 |
|
Other revenues |
|
|
6,919 |
|
|
|
18.6 |
|
|
|
8,541 |
|
|
|
11.5 |
|
Fuel expense |
|
|
46,218 |
|
|
|
16.7 |
|
|
|
74,059 |
|
|
|
13.5 |
|
Purchased power -non-affiliates |
|
|
(31,192 |
) |
|
|
(47.6 |
) |
|
|
(35,968 |
) |
|
|
(38.2 |
) |
Purchased power -affiliates |
|
|
1,087 |
|
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
(10,547 |
) |
|
|
(8.8 |
) |
Maintenance expense |
|
|
(9,860 |
) |
|
|
(10.9 |
) |
|
|
33,307 |
|
|
|
19.5 |
|
Income taxes |
|
|
6,006 |
|
|
|
8.3 |
|
|
|
(37,817 |
) |
|
|
(29.1 |
) |
Retail revenues. The chart below reflects the primary drivers of the 1.9% increase in retail
revenues in the second quarter 2005 compared to the same period in the prior year and the 1.2%
decrease in retail revenues year-to-date compared to the corresponding period in 2004. Energy cost
recovery revenues and revenues associated with the recovery of costs associated with PPAs
certificated by the Alabama PSC (Rate CNP-PPA) generally do not affect net income. Excluding these
revenues, retail revenues increased by $7.5 million, or 1.3%, for the second quarter 2005 and $5.9
million, or 0.5%, year-to-date 2005 when compared to the corresponding periods in 2004 due to the
retail rate increase implemented in January 2005 to recover environmental costs. See Note 3 to the
financial statements of Alabama Power under Retail Regulatory Matters in Item 8 of the Form 10-K
for additional information on Alabama Powers rates. Kilowatt-hour energy sales to residential and
commercial customers decreased 4.3% and 0.5%, respectively, for the second quarter 2005 and
decreased 4.0% and 1.0%, respectively, year-to-date 2005 when compared to the corresponding periods
of 2004 primarily due to less favorable weather conditions in 2005. Kilowatt-hour energy sales to
industrial customers increased 2.0% for the second quarter 2005 and increased 2.6% year-to-date
2005 when compared to the corresponding periods of 2004 primarily from increased sales demand in
the pulp and paper, chemical, and automotive sectors.
Details of retail revenues are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second Quarter |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year-to-Date |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
|
% change |
|
|
(in millions) |
|
|
% change |
|
Retail prior year |
|
$ |
847 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,592 |
|
|
|
|
|
Change in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Base rates |
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
Sales growth |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
Weather |
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
(2.0 |
) |
|
|
(29 |
) |
|
|
(1.8 |
) |
Energy cost recovery |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
(28 |
) |
|
|
(1.8 |
) |
Rate CNP-PPA cost recovery |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
Retail current year |
|
$ |
863 |
|
|
|
1.9 |
% |
|
$ |
1,572 |
|
|
|
(1.2 |
)% |
|
Sales for resale non-affiliates. Energy sales to non-affiliates will vary depending on the
market cost of available energy compared to the cost of Alabama Power and Southern Company system
owned generation,
34
ALABAMA POWER COMPANY
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
demand for energy within the Southern Company service territory, and availability of Southern
Company system generation. In the second quarter 2005, sales for resale to non-affiliates
increased when compared to the same period in 2004 primarily due to a 7.7% increase in price while
kilowatt-hour sales to non-affiliates remained relatively flat. Year-to-date 2005, sales for
resale to non-affiliates increased $12.6 million primarily due to a 3.5% increase in kilowatt-hour
sales while price remained relatively flat. These transactions did not have a significant impact
on earnings since energy is usually sold at variable cost.
Sales for resale affiliates. Energy sales to affiliated companies within the Southern
Company system vary from period to period depending on demand and the availability and cost of
generating resources at each company. These sales are made in accordance with the IIC, as approved
by the FERC. In the second quarter 2005, sales for resale to affiliates decreased $6 million when
compared to the same period in 2004 primarily due to a 16.1% decrease in kilowatt-hour sales to
affiliates, primarily as a result of milder weather conditions in the Southern Company service
territory. Year-to-date 2005, sales for resale to affiliates increased $35.5 million due to a 6.3%
increase in kilowatt-hour sales to affiliates from Alabama Powers more economical available
capacity and price increases related to the recovery of increased fuel-related expenses. These
transactions did not have a significant impact on earnings since this energy is generally sold at
marginal cost.
Other revenues. The increases in other revenues for the second quarter and year-to-date 2005
when compared to the same periods in 2004 are attributed to a $4.3 million increase in transmission
revenues, a $1.3 million increase in rent from electric property, and a $1.5 million increase in
miscellaneous electric revenues due to a customers early termination of an electric service
contract.
Fuel expense. Fuel expense was higher in the second quarter 2005 when compared to the
corresponding period in 2004 due to a 23.6% increase in the average cost of coal and a 12.1%
increase in natural gas prices. The year-to-date 2005 increase in fuel expense when compared to
the same period in 2004 is mainly due to an 18.6% increase in the average cost of coal and a 5.7%
increase in generation from coal-fired facilities. The increase in generation from coal-fired
facilities for year-to-date 2005 is mainly due to a 20.3% decrease in generation from Alabama
Powers gas-fired generating facilities because of a 19.4% increase in gas prices. Since energy
expenses are generally offset by energy revenues, these expenses do not have a significant impact
on earnings.
Purchased power non-affiliates. Purchased power from non-affiliates will vary depending on
market cost of available energy being lower than Southern Company system generated energy, demand
for energy within the service territory, and availability of Southern Company system generation.
In the second quarter 2005, purchased power from non-affiliates decreased when compared to the same
period in 2004 primarily due to a 44.4% decrease in the amount of energy purchased resulting from a
4% increase in self-generation and a 5.9% decrease in the average price of non-affiliate purchased
power. Year-to-date 2005, purchased power from non-affiliates decreased $36.0 million when
compared to the same period in 2004 mainly due to a 31.1% decrease in energy purchased as a result
of a 6% increase in self-generation. These transactions did not have a significant impact on
earnings since energy purchases are generally offset by energy revenues through Alabama Powers
energy cost recovery clause.
Purchased power affiliates. Purchased power from affiliates will vary depending on demand
and the availability and cost of generating resources at each company within the Southern Company
system. These purchases are made in accordance with the IIC, as approved by the FERC. Purchased
power from affiliates increased in the second quarter 2005 compared to the same period in 2004 due
to a 21.3% increase in price primarily resulting from increased fuel costs offset by a 16.1%
reduction in the amount of energy purchased resulting from a 4% increase in self-generation.
Year-to-date 2005 purchased power from affiliates decreased $10.5 million when compared to the same period in 2004 mainly due to a 25.6% decrease in energy
purchased
35
ALABAMA POWER COMPANY
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
as a result of a 6% increase in self-generation as purchased power prices increased by
22.6% during 2005. These transactions did not have a significant impact on earnings since energy
purchases are generally offset by energy revenues through Alabama Powers energy cost recovery
clause.
Maintenance expense. The decrease in maintenance expense for the second quarter 2005 when
compared to the same period in 2004 is attributed to a $5.4 million decrease to other power
generation expense primarily related to a customers reimbursement of expenses for damage at the
Washington County combined cycle facility that occurred in 2004, a $2.2 million decrease to
transmission expense, and a $1.9 million decrease in distribution expense. These decreases in
transmission and distribution expenses for the second quarter 2005 are mainly related to the timing
of scheduled overhead line maintenance. The year-to-date 2005 increase in maintenance expense is
mainly due to a $10.8 million increase in transmission expense and a $34.2 million increase in
distribution expense. These increases are a result of the Alabama PSC accounting order to offset
the costs of the damage from Hurricane Ivan in September 2004 and to restore a balance in the
natural disaster reserve. See Notes 1 and 3 to the financial statements of Alabama Power under
Natural Disaster Reserve and Natural Disaster Cost Recovery, respectively, in Item 8 of the
Form 10-K for additional information. Also, see Income tax expense below for additional
offsetting impacts of the Alabama PSCs order.
Income tax expense. Year-to-date 2005, in accordance with the Alabama PSC accounting order
described above, Alabama Power returned $27.7 million of regulatory liabilities related to deferred
income taxes to its retail customers. The remainder of the decrease in income tax expense
primarily reflects the $17.3 million tax effect of the additional maintenance expenses recorded
under the accounting order. For additional information, see Maintenance expense above and Note 3
to the financial statements of Alabama Power under Natural Disaster Cost Recovery in Item 8 of
the Form 10-K. The impact of this accounting order is expected to reduce Alabama Powers annual
effective income tax rate to approximately 35% for 2005. See Note 5 to the financial statements of
Alabama Power in Item 8 of the Form 10-K and Note (H) to the Condensed Financial Statements herein
for additional information.
FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL
The results of operations discussed above are not necessarily indicative of Alabama Powers future
earnings potential. The level of Alabama Powers future earnings depends on numerous factors that
affect the opportunities, challenges, and risks of Alabama Powers business of selling electricity.
These factors include Alabama Powers ability to maintain a stable regulatory environment, to
achieve energy sales growth while containing costs, and to recover costs related to growing demand
and increasingly stringent environmental standards. Future earnings in the near term will depend,
in part, upon growth in energy sales, which is subject to a number of factors. These factors
include weather, competition, new energy contracts with neighboring utilities, energy conservation
practiced by customers, the price of electricity, the price elasticity of demand, and the rate of
economic growth in Alabama Powers service area. For additional information relating to these
issues, see BUSINESS The SOUTHERN System Risk Factors in Item 1 and MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION
AND ANALYSIS FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL of Alabama Power in Item 7 of the Form 10-K.
Environmental Matters
Compliance costs related to the Clean Air Act and other environmental regulations could affect
earnings if such costs cannot be recovered. For additional information, including information on
certain environmental litigation, see MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS FUTURE EARNINGS
POTENTIAL Environmental Matters of Alabama Power in Item 7 and Note 3 to the financial statements of
Alabama Power under Environmental Matters in Item 8 of the Form 10-K.
36
ALABAMA POWER COMPANY
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
New Source Review Actions
On June 3, 2005, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Alabama issued its decision
in favor of Alabama Power on two primary legal issues in the case: (1) the scope of the routine
maintenance repair and replacement exclusion under the New Source Review rules and (2) the proper
test for calculating emissions increases under those rules. The court decided that routine
maintenance repair and replacement must be defined with reference to what is routine in the
industry as opposed to what is routine at an individual unit and emissions increases must be
measured against the maximum hourly emission rate. The decision does not resolve the case, nor
does it address other legal issues associated with the EPAs allegations involving Plant Miller
Units 3 and 4. In separate orders, the court dismissed Alabama Powers motion for summary judgment
on the other claims, stayed the entire case, and referred the parties to mediation to be completed
by September 9, 2005. Alabama Power may refile its motion for summary judgment if the mediation
proves unsuccessful. The ultimate outcome of this matter cannot now be determined. See
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL Environmental Matters New
Source Review Actions of Alabama Power in Item 7 and Note 3 to the financial statements of Alabama
Power under New Source Review Actions in Item 8 of the Form 10-K.
Environmental Statutes and Regulations
The EPA issued the final Clean Air Interstate Rule on March 10, 2005. The rule addresses sulfur
dioxide (SO2) and nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions that contribute to
nonattainment of the eight-hour ozone and fine particulate matter National Ambient Air Quality
Standards. Twenty-eight eastern states, including the State of Alabama, are subject to the fine
particulate and/or the eight-hour ozone requirements set forth within the rule. The rule may
require additional reductions of NOx and/or SO2 to be achieved by the
installation of additional controls at Alabama Powers facilities or through the purchase of
allowances. The impact of this final rule on Alabama Power will, however, depend on the outcome of
legal challenges and development and implementation of applicable state regulations and therefore
cannot be determined at this time.
On March 15, 2005, the EPA announced the final Clean Air Mercury Rule, selecting a
cap-and-trade approach to be implemented in two phases, 2010 and 2018. The rule sets a permanent
cap on emissions at the
2018 level and provides for an emissions allowance trading market. The impact of this final rule
on Alabama Power will depend on the outcome of legal challenges and development and implementation
of applicable state regulations and therefore cannot be determined at this time.
On June 15, 2005, the EPA issued final rules addressing Best Available Retrofit Technology
(BART) standards under the Regional Haze Program. States must develop regulations to implement the
federal regional haze requirements, including BART standards, by December 17, 2007. The impact of
the final BART rules on Alabama Power will depend on the outcome of any litigation over the final
rules and the development and implementation of the applicable state regulations and therefore
cannot be determined at this time.
FERC and Alabama PSC Matters
Market-Based Rate Authority
See MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL FERC and
Alabama PSC Matters Market-Based Rate Authority of Alabama Power in Item 7 and Note 3 to the
financial statements of Alabama Power under Market-Based Rate Authority in Item 8 of the Form
10-K for information on the FERCs April 2004 order adopting a new interim analysis for
measuring generation market power and a proceeding initiated by the FERC in December 2004 to
assess Southern Companys generation dominance within its retail service territory. Alabama
Power has authorization from the FERC to
37
ALABAMA POWER COMPANY
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
sell power to non-affiliates at market-based prices.
Alabama Power, through SCS as agent, also has FERC authority to make short-term opportunity
sales at market rates. Specific FERC approval must be obtained with respect to a market-based
contract with an affiliate. On February 15, 2005, Southern Company submitted additional
information related to generation dominance in its retail service territory. On July 8, 2005,
the FERC initiated a hearing before an administrative law judge to review the generation market
power issues. Any new market-based rate transactions in Southern Companys retail service
territory entered into after February 27, 2005 will be subject to refund to the level of the
default cost-based rates, pending the outcome of the proceeding. In the event that the FERCs
default mitigation measures are ultimately applied, Alabama Power may be required to charge
cost-based rates for certain wholesale sales in the Southern Company retail service territory,
which may be lower than negotiated market-based rates. The impact of such sales through June
30, 2005 is not material to Alabama Powers net income. The final outcome of this matter will
depend on the form in which the final methodology for assessing generation market power and
mitigation rules may be ultimately adopted and cannot be determined at this time.
In addition, on May 5, 2005, the FERC issued an order expanding the generation market power
proceeding initiated in December 2004 to include an investigation of whether Southern Company
satisfies the other three parts of the FERCs market-based rate analysis: transmission market
power, barriers to entry, and affiliate abuse or reciprocal dealing. The FERC established a new
refund period related to this expanded investigation. Any and all new market-based rate
transactions involving any Southern Company subsidiary will be subject to refund to the extent the
FERC orders lower rates beginning July 19, 2005. The FERC also directed that this expanded
proceeding be held in abeyance pending the outcome of the proceeding on the IIC discussed below.
Southern Company and its subsidiaries believe that there is no meritorious basis for these
allegations and intend to vigorously defend themselves in the proceeding. However, the final
outcome of this matter, including any remedies to be applied in the event of an adverse ruling in
this proceeding, cannot now be determined.
Intercompany Interchange Contract
Also, on May 5, 2005, the FERC initiated a new proceeding to examine (1) the provisions of the IIC
among Alabama Power, Georgia Power, Gulf Power, Mississippi Power, Savannah Electric, Southern
Power, and SCS, as agent, under the terms of which the power pool of Southern Company is operated,
and, in particular, the propriety of the continued inclusion of Southern Power as a party to the
IIC, (2) whether any parties to the IIC have violated the FERCs standards of conduct applicable to
utility companies that are transmission providers, and (3) whether Southern Companys code of
conduct defining Southern Power as a system company rather than a marketing affiliate is just
and reasonable. In 2000, in connection with the formation of Southern Power, the FERC authorized
Southern Powers inclusion in the IIC. The FERC also previously approved Southern Companys code
of conduct. The FERC order directs that the administrative law judge who presided over a previous
proceeding involving Southern Power, Georgia Power and Savannah Electric be assigned to preside
over the hearing in this proceeding and that the testimony and exhibits presented in that
proceeding be preserved to the extent appropriate. Effective July 19, 2005, revenues from
transactions under the IIC involving any Southern Company subsidiaries will be subject to refund to
the extent the FERC orders any changes to the IIC.
Southern Company and its subsidiaries believe that there is no meritorious basis for these
allegations and intend to vigorously defend themselves in the proceeding. However, the final
outcome of this matter, including any remedies to be applied in the event of an adverse ruling in
this proceeding, cannot now be determined.
38
ALABAMA POWER COMPANY
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Generation Interconnection Agreements
See MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL FERC and Alabama PSC
Matters Generation Interconnection Agreements of Alabama Power in Item 7 of the Form 10-K for
information on the FERCs Order 2003 related to standardization of generation interconnection
agreements and procedures. The FERC has indicated that Order 2003, which was effective January 20,
2004, is to be applied prospectively to interconnection agreements. Subsidiaries of Tenaska, Inc.,
as counterparties to two previously executed interconnection agreements with Alabama Power, have
filed complaints at the FERC requesting that the FERC modify the agreements and that Alabama Power
refund a total of $11 million previously paid for interconnection facilities, with interest.
Alabama Power has also received similar requests from other entities totaling $7 million. Alabama
Power has opposed such relief, and the proceedings are still pending. The impact of Order 2003 and
its subsequent rehearings on Alabama Power and the final results of these matters cannot be
determined at this time.
Hydro Relicensing
On July 28, 2005, Alabama Power filed two applications with the FERC for a new 50-year license for
Alabama Powers seven hydroelectric developments on the Coosa River (Weiss, Henry, Logan Martin,
Lay, Mitchell, Jordan, and Bouldin) and a new 50-year license for the Lewis Smith and Bankhead
developments on the Warrior River. The FERC licenses for all of these nine projects expire in
2007. Upon or after the expiration of each license, the United States Government, by act of
Congress, may take over the project or the FERC may relicense the project either to the original
licensee or to a new licensee. The FERC may grant relicenses subject to certain requirements that
could result in additional costs to Alabama Power. The final outcome of this matter cannot be
determined at this time. See Note (I) to the Condensed Financial Statements herein for additional
information.
Nuclear Relicensing
See MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL FERC and Alabama PSC
Matters Nuclear Relicensing of Alabama Power in Item 7 and Note 1 to the financial statements of
Alabama Power under Nuclear Decommissioning in Item 8 of the Form 10-K for information on Alabama
Powers application to extend the operating license for Plant Farley for an additional 20 years and
Alabama Powers nuclear decommissioning trust funds (NDT). On May 12, 2005, the NRC approved the
license extension. Consequently, amounts previously contributed to the NDT are currently projected
to be adequate to meet the decommissioning obligations. Therefore, on June 23, 2005, the Alabama
PSC approved a request by Alabama Power to suspend, effective January 1, 2005, the inclusion in its
annual cost of service of $18 million in decommissioning costs and to suspend also the associated
obligation to make semi-annual contributions to the NDT. Should projections of balances in the
external trusts prove to be inadequate to meet future estimates for decommissioning costs, Alabama
Power would seek Alabama PSC approval to address that issue in a manner consistent with NRC and
other applicable requirements. See Note (I) to the Condensed Financial Statements herein for
additional information.
Environmental Rate Filing
On October 5, 2004, the Alabama PSC approved a specific rate mechanism for the recovery of
Alabama Powers retail costs associated with environmental laws, regulations, or other such
mandates. The rate mechanism began operation in January 2005 and provides for the recovery of
these costs pursuant to a factor that will be calculated annually. Environmental costs to be
recovered include operation and maintenance expenses, depreciation, and a return on invested capital. Retail rates increased 1 percent in
January 2005, which should yield an annual recovery of approximately $33 million, and are
expected to increase an
39
ALABAMA POWER COMPANY
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
additional 1% in 2006. In conjunction with the Alabama PSCs
approval, Alabama Power agreed to a moratorium until March 2007 on any retail rate increase under the previously approved Rate Stabilization
and Equalization plan (RSE). Any increase in March 2007 would be based upon the earned return
on retail common equity at December 31, 2006. See Note 3 to the financial statements of Alabama
Power under Retail Regulatory Matters in Item 8 of the Form 10-K for further information on
the RSE plan.
Retail Fuel Cost Recovery
Alabama Power fuel costs are recovered under Rate ECR (Energy Cost Recovery), which provides for
the addition of a fuel and energy cost factor to base rates. Alabama Powers under-recovered fuel
costs as of June 30, 2005 totaled $127.4 million as compared to $101.6 million at December 31,
2004. Alabama Power increased its fuel billing factor in April 2005. Alabama Power will continue
to monitor the under-recovered fuel cost balance to determine if an additional adjustment to
billing rates should be requested from the Alabama PSC. See MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS -
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS Revenues of Alabama Power in Item 7 and Note 3 to the financial
statements of Alabama Power under Retail Regulatory Matters in Item 8 of the Form 10-K and Note
(I) to the Condensed Financial Statements herein for additional information.
Natural Disaster Cost Recovery
On July 10, 2005, Hurricane Dennis impacted the Gulf Coast of Alabama and continued north through
the state of Alabama, causing significant damage in parts of the service territory of Alabama
Power. Approximately 241,000 of Alabama Powers 1,390,000 customer accounts were without
electrical service immediately after the hurricane. See Note 1 to the financial statements of
Alabama Power under Natural Disaster Reserve in Item 8 of the Form 10-K for information on how
Alabama Power maintains a reserve to cover uninsured expenses resulting from storms. The total
operation and maintenance costs associated with repairing the damage to facilities and restoring
service to customers are preliminarily estimated to be approximately $30 million. The June 30,
2005 balance of $4.2 million in the natural disaster reserve is not sufficient to cover these
costs. Alabama Power has requested clarification from the Alabama PSC concerning an October 2004
order that allows the natural disaster reserve to carry a negative balance and to defer such costs
for recovery in future periods to be determined by the Alabama PSC. If this request is not
approved, Alabama Power would be required to expense the costs in excess of the reserve balance in
the third quarter of 2005. See Note (I) to the Condensed Financial Statements herein for
additional information.
Other Matters
In July 2005, the U.S. Congress passed the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (Energy
Act), which President Bush is expected to sign into law in early August 2005. Among
other things, the Energy Act includes various tax subsidies for electric utilities
and provisions repealing the PUHCA. The Energy Act also amends federal energy laws
and provides the FERC with new oversight responsibilities for the electric utility
industry. The implementation of the Energy Act requires proceedings at the state
level and the development of regulations by the FERC, as well as other federal
agencies. Alabama Power is still reviewing the legislation; however, its impacts
will depend on the promulgation and implementation of final rules and cannot be
determined at this time.
Alabama Power is subject to certain claims and legal actions arising in the ordinary course of
business. In addition, Alabama Powers business activities are subject to extensive governmental
regulation related to public health and the environment. Litigation over environmental issues and
claims of various types, including property damage, personal injury, and citizen enforcement of
environmental requirements, has increased generally throughout the United States. In particular,
personal injury claims for damages caused by alleged exposure to hazardous materials have become
more frequent. The ultimate outcome of such litigation against Alabama Power cannot be predicted
at this time; however, management does not anticipate that the liabilities, if any, arising from
such current proceedings would have a material adverse effect on Alabama Powers financial
statements.
40
ALABAMA POWER COMPANY
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
See the Notes to the Condensed Financial Statements herein for discussion of various
contingencies and other matters which may affect future earnings potential.
ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Application of Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Alabama Power prepares its financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States. Significant accounting policies are described in Note 1 to the
financial statements of Alabama Power in Item 8 of the Form 10-K. In the application of these
policies, certain estimates are made that may have a material impact on Alabama Powers results of
operations and related disclosures. Different assumptions and measurements could produce estimates
that are significantly different from those recorded in the financial statements. See MANAGEMENTS
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS ACCOUNTING POLICIES Application of Critical Accounting
Policies and Estimates of Alabama Power in Item 7 of the Form 10-K for a complete discussion of
Alabama Powers critical accounting policies and estimates related to Electric Utility Regulation,
Contingent Obligations, and Unbilled Revenues.
New Accounting Standards
FASB Statement No. 123R, Share-Based Payments, was issued in December 2004. This statement
requires that compensation cost relating to share-based payment transactions be recognized in
financial statements. That cost will be measured based on the grant date fair value of the equity
instruments issued. In April 2005, the SEC amended the compliance dates for FASB Statement No. 123R. For Alabama Power, this
statement is now effective beginning January 1, 2006. Although the compensation expense
calculation required under the revised statement differs slightly, the impacts on Alabama Powers
financial statements are expected to be similar to the pro forma disclosures included in Note 1 to
the financial statements of Alabama Power under Stock Options in Item 8 of the Form 10-K and in
Note (C) to the Condensed Financial Statements herein.
FASB Interpretation No. 47 (FIN 47), Accounting for Conditional Asset Retirement Obligations,
was issued in March 2005. This interpretation requires that asset retirement obligations be
recorded when a legal obligation exists even though the timing and/or the method of settlement are
conditional on a future event. For Alabama Power, FIN 47 is effective no later than December 31,
2005. Alabama Power is currently assessing the impact of FIN 47 on its balance sheet; however,
adoption is not currently expected to have a material impact on Alabama Powers income statement.
In December 2004, the FASB issued Staff Position No. 109-1 (FSP 109-1), Application of FASB
Statement No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes, to the Tax Deduction on Qualified Production
Activities provided by the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004, which requires that the generation
deduction for utilities be accounted for as a special tax deduction rather than as a tax rate
reduction. Alabama Power adopted FSP 109-1 in the first quarter of 2005 with no material impact on
its financial statements.
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND LIQUIDITY
Alabama Powers financial condition continued to be strong at June 30, 2005. Net cash flows from
operating activities totaled $281 million for the first six months of 2005, compared to $291.9
million for the first six months of 2004. The $10.9 million decrease in the first six months
resulted primarily from an increase in cost
41
ALABAMA POWER COMPANY
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
and inventory of fuel. Those costs are recoverable in future periods and are reflected on the balance
sheets as under recovered regulatory clause revenues. Gross property additions to utility plant
were $379.7 million in the first six months of 2005 and are included in the balance sheets herein.
The majority of funds needed for gross property additions since 2000 has been provided from
operating activities.
Capital Requirements and Contractual Obligations
See MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS FINANCIAL CONDITION AND LIQUIDITY Capital Requirements and Contractual Obligations of
Alabama Power in Item 7 of the Form 10-K for a description of Alabama Powers capital requirements
for its construction program, lease obligations, purchase commitments, and trust funding
requirements. See Note (I) to the Condensed Financial Statements herein for information concerning
the suspension of the funding of the Nuclear Decommissioning Trust. Approximately $422 million
will be required by June 30, 2006 for redemptions and maturities of long-term debt.
Sources of Capital
Alabama Power plans to obtain the funds required for construction and other
purposes from sources similar to those used in the past, including funds from operations and new
security issuances. The amount, type, and timing of any financings if needed will depend
upon maintenance of adequate earnings, regulatory approval, prevailing market conditions, and other
factors. See MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS FINANCIAL CONDITION AND LIQUIDITY Sources
of Capital of Alabama Power in Item 7 of the Form 10-K for additional information.
To meet short-term cash needs and contingencies, Alabama Power had at June 30, 2005
approximately $41 million of cash and cash equivalents, unused committed lines of credit of
approximately $872 million (including $504 million of such lines which are dedicated to funding
purchase obligations relating to variable rate pollution control bonds), of which $136 million will
expire at various times during 2005, and an extendible commercial note program. Alabama Power
expects to renew its credit facilities, as needed, prior to expiration. See Note 6 to the
financial statements of Alabama Power under Bank Credit Arrangements in Item 8 of the Form 10-K
for additional information. Alabama Power may also meet short-term cash needs through a Southern
Company subsidiary organized to issue and sell commercial paper and extendible commercial notes at
the request and for the benefit of Alabama Power and other Southern Company subsidiaries. Alabama
Power has regulatory authority for up to $1 billion of short-term borrowings. At June 30, 2005,
Alabama Power had no commercial paper or extendible notes payable outstanding. Management believes
that the need for working capital can be adequately met by issuing commercial paper or utilizing
lines of credit without maintaining large cash balances.
Credit Rating Risk
Alabama Power does not have any credit arrangements that would require material changes in payment
schedules or terminations as a result of a credit rating downgrade. However, Alabama Power is
party to certain derivative agreements that could require collateral and/or accelerated payment in
the event of a credit rating change to below investment grade. These agreements are primarily for
natural gas price and interest rate risk management activities. At June 30, 2005, Alabama Power
had no material exposure under these contracts.
42
ALABAMA POWER COMPANY
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Market Price Risk
Alabama Powers market risk exposures relative to interest rate changes have not changed materially
compared with the December 31, 2004 reporting period. In addition, Alabama Power is not aware of
any facts or circumstances that would significantly affect such exposures in the near term.
Due to cost-based rate regulations, Alabama Power has limited exposure to market volatility in
interest rates, commodity fuel prices, and prices of electricity. To mitigate residual risks
relative to movements in electricity prices, Alabama Power enters into fixed-price contracts for
the purchase and sale of electricity through the wholesale electricity market. Alabama Power has
also implemented a retail fuel hedging program at the instruction of the Alabama PSC.
The fair value of derivative energy contracts at June 30, 2005 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second Quarter |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
Year-to-Date |
|
|
|
Changes |
|
|
Changes |
|
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Contracts beginning of period |
|
$ |
38,162 |
|
|
$ |
4,017 |
|
Contracts realized or settled |
|
|
(15,190 |
) |
|
|
(11,370 |
) |
New contracts at inception |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in valuation techniques |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current period changes (a) |
|
|
(3,717 |
) |
|
|
26,608 |
|
|
Contracts at June 30, 2005 |
|
$ |
19,255 |
|
|
$ |
19,255 |
|
|
(a) |
|
Current period changes also include the changes in fair value of new contracts
entered into during the period. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Source of June 30, 2005 |
|
|
|
Valuation Prices |
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
Maturity |
|
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Year 1 |
|
|
1-3 Years |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
Actively quoted |
|
$ |
19,300 |
|
|
$ |
12,569 |
|
|
$ |
6,731 |
|
External sources |
|
|
(45 |
) |
|
|
(45 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Models and other methods |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contracts at June 30, 2005 |
|
$ |
19,255 |
|
|
$ |
12,524 |
|
|
$ |
6,731 |
|
|
For additional information, see MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
LIQUIDITY Market Price Risk of Alabama Power in Item 7 and Notes 1 and 6 to the
financial statements of Alabama Power under Financial Instruments in Item 8 of the Form 10-K and
Note (F) to the Condensed Financial Statements herein.
Financing Activities
In the first quarter 2005, Alabama Power issued $250 million of Series DD 5.65% Senior Notes due
March 15, 2035. The proceeds from the sale were used to repay a portion of Alabama Powers
outstanding short-term indebtedness and for other general corporate purposes, including Alabama
Powers continuing construction
43
ALABAMA POWER COMPANY
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
activities. Alabama Power settled interest rate swaps related to the transaction at a cost of $21
million, which was recorded in other comprehensive income. This cost will be amortized over a
30-year period.
In the second quarter 2005, Alabama Power entered into two interest rate hedges related to the
anticipated issuance of senior notes totaling $600 million. The notes are expected to be issued in
2005 and 2006.
In June 2005, Alabama Power issued 1,000,000 shares of common stock to Southern Company at
$40.00 a share ($40 million aggregate purchase price). The proceeds from the sale were used by
Alabama Power for general corporate purposes.
In addition to any financings that may be necessary to meet capital requirements and
contractual obligations, Alabama Power plans to continue, when economically feasible, a program to
retire higher-cost securities and replace these obligations with lower-cost capital if market
conditions permit.
44
GEORGIA POWER COMPANY
CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF INCOME (UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months |
|
|
For the Six Months |
|
|
|
Ended June 30, |
|
|
Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Operating Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retail revenues |
|
$ |
1,227,087 |
|
|
$ |
1,199,220 |
|
|
$ |
2,412,323 |
|
|
$ |
2,237,015 |
|
Sales for resale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-affiliates |
|
|
126,000 |
|
|
|
61,597 |
|
|
|
238,852 |
|
|
|
127,053 |
|
Affiliates |
|
|
54,743 |
|
|
|
48,950 |
|
|
|
80,374 |
|
|
|
103,092 |
|
Other revenues |
|
|
51,358 |
|
|
|
43,395 |
|
|
|
98,069 |
|
|
|
85,391 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating revenues |
|
|
1,459,188 |
|
|
|
1,353,162 |
|
|
|
2,829,618 |
|
|
|
2,552,551 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fuel |
|
|
412,050 |
|
|
|
324,220 |
|
|
|
721,316 |
|
|
|
609,434 |
|
Purchased power |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-affiliates |
|
|
64,523 |
|
|
|
97,392 |
|
|
|
117,497 |
|
|
|
160,081 |
|
Affiliates |
|
|
140,800 |
|
|
|
139,319 |
|
|
|
360,804 |
|
|
|
274,461 |
|
Other operations |
|
|
223,471 |
|
|
|
220,799 |
|
|
|
425,550 |
|
|
|
419,192 |
|
Maintenance |
|
|
123,575 |
|
|
|
124,675 |
|
|
|
240,225 |
|
|
|
233,143 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
124,999 |
|
|
|
68,542 |
|
|
|
248,099 |
|
|
|
136,279 |
|
Taxes other than income taxes |
|
|
58,648 |
|
|
|
56,488 |
|
|
|
119,407 |
|
|
|
112,920 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
1,148,066 |
|
|
|
1,031,435 |
|
|
|
2,232,898 |
|
|
|
1,945,510 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Income |
|
|
311,122 |
|
|
|
321,727 |
|
|
|
596,720 |
|
|
|
607,041 |
|
Other Income and (Expense): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for equity funds used during construction |
|
|
7,935 |
|
|
|
4,700 |
|
|
|
17,192 |
|
|
|
8,047 |
|
Interest income |
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
1,768 |
|
|
|
502 |
|
|
|
4,120 |
|
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized |
|
|
(55,174 |
) |
|
|
(48,293 |
) |
|
|
(105,594 |
) |
|
|
(93,943 |
) |
Interest expense to affiliate trusts |
|
|
(14,877 |
) |
|
|
(14,810 |
) |
|
|
(29,755 |
) |
|
|
(14,810 |
) |
Distributions on mandatorily redeemable preferred securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15,839 |
) |
Other income (expense), net |
|
|
2,821 |
|
|
|
(5,613 |
) |
|
|
(21 |
) |
|
|
(10,008 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income and (expense) |
|
|
(59,264 |
) |
|
|
(62,248 |
) |
|
|
(117,676 |
) |
|
|
(122,433 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings Before Income Taxes |
|
|
251,858 |
|
|
|
259,479 |
|
|
|
479,044 |
|
|
|
484,608 |
|
Income taxes |
|
|
94,140 |
|
|
|
103,597 |
|
|
|
178,794 |
|
|
|
184,717 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income |
|
|
157,718 |
|
|
|
155,882 |
|
|
|
300,250 |
|
|
|
299,891 |
|
Dividends on Preferred Stock |
|
|
167 |
|
|
|
167 |
|
|
|
335 |
|
|
|
335 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income After Dividends on Preferred Stock |
|
$ |
157,551 |
|
|
$ |
155,715 |
|
|
$ |
299,915 |
|
|
$ |
299,556 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months |
|
|
For the Six Months |
|
|
|
Ended June 30, |
|
|
Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Net Income After Dividends on Preferred Stock |
|
$ |
157,551 |
|
|
$ |
155,715 |
|
|
$ |
299,915 |
|
|
$ |
299,556 |
|
Other comprehensive income (loss): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in fair value of marketable securities, net of tax
of $28 and $103, respectively |
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
164 |
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in fair value of qualifying hedges, net of tax
of $(7,260), $4,590, $(5,890) and $3,710, respectively |
|
|
(11,510 |
) |
|
|
7,277 |
|
|
|
(9,338 |
) |
|
|
5,882 |
|
Reclassification adjustment for amounts included in net income,
net of tax of $345, $558, $521 and $1,237, respectively |
|
|
246 |
|
|
|
884 |
|
|
|
526 |
|
|
|
1,961 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME |
|
$ |
146,333 |
|
|
$ |
163,876 |
|
|
$ |
291,267 |
|
|
$ |
307,399 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes as they relate to Georgia Power are an integral part of these condensed financial statements.
46
GEORGIA POWER COMPANY
CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Six Months |
|
|
|
Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Operating Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
300,250 |
|
|
$ |
299,891 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income
to net cash provided from operating activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
292,447 |
|
|
|
177,927 |
|
Deferred income taxes and investment tax credits |
|
|
89,724 |
|
|
|
127,958 |
|
Deferred expenses affiliates |
|
|
20,302 |
|
|
|
8,454 |
|
Allowance for equity funds used during construction |
|
|
(17,192 |
) |
|
|
(8,047 |
) |
Pension, postretirement, and other employee benefits |
|
|
5,318 |
|
|
|
1,616 |
|
Tax benefit of stock options |
|
|
10,854 |
|
|
|
5,570 |
|
Other, net |
|
|
(11,912 |
) |
|
|
(19,266 |
) |
Changes in certain current assets and liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables, net |
|
|
(247,991 |
) |
|
|
(146,027 |
) |
Fossil fuel stock |
|
|
(23,692 |
) |
|
|
(6,309 |
) |
Materials and supplies |
|
|
(16,024 |
) |
|
|
(2,680 |
) |
Other current assets |
|
|
14,055 |
|
|
|
29,779 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
(59,236 |
) |
|
|
50,399 |
|
Accrued taxes |
|
|
43,098 |
|
|
|
(78,952 |
) |
Accrued compensation |
|
|
(64,952 |
) |
|
|
(67,828 |
) |
Other current liabilities |
|
|
22,357 |
|
|
|
25,648 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided from operating activities |
|
|
357,406 |
|
|
|
398,133 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross property additions |
|
|
(408,120 |
) |
|
|
(339,171 |
) |
Purchase of property from affiliates |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(333,253 |
) |
Cost of removal net of salvage |
|
|
(10,359 |
) |
|
|
(14,236 |
) |
Change in construction payables, net of joint owner portion |
|
|
(39,400 |
) |
|
|
(23,743 |
) |
Other |
|
|
24,356 |
|
|
|
10,899 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used for investing activities |
|
|
(433,523 |
) |
|
|
(699,504 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in notes payable, net |
|
|
171,669 |
|
|
|
234,749 |
|
Proceeds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior notes |
|
|
375,000 |
|
|
|
350,000 |
|
Pollution control bonds |
|
|
185,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Mandatorily redeemable preferred securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
200,000 |
|
Capital contributions from parent company |
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
|
223,000 |
|
Redemptions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior notes |
|
|
(300,000 |
) |
|
|
(200,000 |
) |
Pollution control redemptions |
|
|
(85,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Mandatorily redeemable preferred securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(200,000 |
) |
Special deposits redemption funds |
|
|
(100,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Payment of preferred stock dividends |
|
|
(211 |
) |
|
|
(209 |
) |
Payment of common stock dividends |
|
|
(278,050 |
) |
|
|
(282,750 |
) |
Other |
|
|
(16,494 |
) |
|
|
(11,860 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided from financing activities |
|
|
51,914 |
|
|
|
312,930 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Change in Cash and Cash Equivalents |
|
|
(24,203 |
) |
|
|
11,559 |
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Period |
|
|
33,497 |
|
|
|
8,699 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Period |
|
$ |
9,294 |
|
|
$ |
20,258 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental Cash Flow Information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid during the period for |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest (net of $6,996 and $2,804 capitalized
for 2005 and 2004, respectively) |
|
$ |
123,323 |
|
|
$ |
120,449 |
|
Income taxes (net of refunds) |
|
$ |
3,310 |
|
|
$ |
35,078 |
|
The accompanying notes as they relate to Georgia Power are an integral part of these condensed financial statements.
47
GEORGIA POWER COMPANY
CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS (UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At June 30, |
|
|
At December 31, |
|
Assets |
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Current Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
9,294 |
|
|
$ |
33,497 |
|
Receivables |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer accounts receivable |
|
|
361,605 |
|
|
|
317,937 |
|
Unbilled revenues |
|
|
168,392 |
|
|
|
140,027 |
|
Under recovered regulatory clause revenues |
|
|
153,301 |
|
|
|
345,542 |
|
Special deposits redemption funds |
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other accounts and notes receivable |
|
|
85,223 |
|
|
|
94,377 |
|
Affiliated companies |
|
|
31,350 |
|
|
|
17,042 |
|
Accumulated provision for uncollectible accounts |
|
|
(6,575 |
) |
|
|
(7,100 |
) |
Fossil fuel stock, at average cost |
|
|
207,959 |
|
|
|
184,267 |
|
Vacation pay |
|
|
57,227 |
|
|
|
57,372 |
|
Materials and supplies, at average cost |
|
|
286,446 |
|
|
|
270,422 |
|
Prepaid expenses |
|
|
10,862 |
|
|
|
32,695 |
|
Other |
|
|
23,730 |
|
|
|
28,262 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
1,488,814 |
|
|
|
1,514,340 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, Plant, and Equipment: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In service |
|
|
19,327,416 |
|
|
|
18,681,533 |
|
Less accumulated provision for depreciation |
|
|
7,392,744 |
|
|
|
7,217,607 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,934,672 |
|
|
|
11,463,926 |
|
Nuclear fuel, at amortized cost |
|
|
129,567 |
|
|
|
124,745 |
|
Construction work in progress |
|
|
443,904 |
|
|
|
766,140 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total property, plant, and equipment |
|
|
12,508,143 |
|
|
|
12,354,811 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Property and Investments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity investments in unconsolidated subsidiaries |
|
|
65,949 |
|
|
|
66,192 |
|
Nuclear decommissioning trusts, at fair value |
|
|
466,656 |
|
|
|
459,194 |
|
Other |
|
|
64,472 |
|
|
|
64,571 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other property and investments |
|
|
597,077 |
|
|
|
589,957 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred Charges and Other Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred charges related to income taxes |
|
|
506,259 |
|
|
|
505,664 |
|
Prepaid pension costs |
|
|
460,865 |
|
|
|
450,270 |
|
Unamortized debt issuance expense |
|
|
88,638 |
|
|
|
77,925 |
|
Unamortized loss on reacquired debt |
|
|
172,961 |
|
|
|
176,825 |
|
Deferred under recovered regulatory clause revenues |
|
|
362,692 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other regulatory assets |
|
|
94,288 |
|
|
|
69,637 |
|
Other |
|
|
76,410 |
|
|
|
82,909 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred charges and other assets |
|
|
1,762,113 |
|
|
|
1,363,230 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets |
|
$ |
16,356,147 |
|
|
$ |
15,822,338 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
accompanying notes as they relate to Georgia Power are an integral part of these condensed financial statements.
48
GEORGIA POWER COMPANY
CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS (UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At June 30, |
|
|
At December 31, |
|
Liabilities and Stockholder's Equity |
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Current Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities due within one year |
|
$ |
402,603 |
|
|
$ |
452,498 |
|
Notes payable |
|
|
379,902 |
|
|
|
208,233 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Affiliated |
|
|
157,765 |
|
|
|
194,253 |
|
Other |
|
|
248,786 |
|
|
|
310,763 |
|
Customer deposits |
|
|
122,446 |
|
|
|
115,661 |
|
Accrued taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes |
|
|
183,985 |
|
|
|
78,269 |
|
Other |
|
|
115,596 |
|
|
|
129,520 |
|
Accrued interest |
|
|
78,595 |
|
|
|
74,529 |
|
Accrued vacation pay |
|
|
44,179 |
|
|
|
44,894 |
|
Accrued compensation |
|
|
62,388 |
|
|
|
127,340 |
|
Other |
|
|
124,252 |
|
|
|
83,632 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
1,920,497 |
|
|
|
1,819,592 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term Debt |
|
|
3,931,825 |
|
|
|
3,709,852 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term Debt Payable to Affiliated Trusts |
|
|
969,073 |
|
|
|
969,073 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred Credits and Other Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated deferred income taxes |
|
|
2,598,783 |
|
|
|
2,556,040 |
|
Deferred credits related to income taxes |
|
|
164,588 |
|
|
|
170,973 |
|
Accumulated deferred investment tax credits |
|
|
293,872 |
|
|
|
300,018 |
|
Employee benefit obligations |
|
|
346,916 |
|
|
|
331,002 |
|
Asset retirement obligations |
|
|
520,298 |
|
|
|
504,515 |
|
Other cost of removal obligations |
|
|
416,431 |
|
|
|
411,692 |
|
Miscellaneous regulatory liabilities |
|
|
90,672 |
|
|
|
84,678 |
|
Other |
|
|
73,974 |
|
|
|
59,733 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred credits and other liabilities |
|
|
4,505,534 |
|
|
|
4,418,651 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities |
|
|
11,326,929 |
|
|
|
10,917,168 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred Stock |
|
|
14,609 |
|
|
|
14,609 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stockholders Equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, without par value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Authorized
15,000,000 shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding 7,761,500 shares |
|
|
344,250 |
|
|
|
344,250 |
|
Paid-in capital |
|
|
2,589,121 |
|
|
|
2,478,268 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
2,124,641 |
|
|
|
2,102,798 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
|
(43,403 |
) |
|
|
(34,755 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total common stockholders equity |
|
|
5,014,609 |
|
|
|
4,890,561 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities and Stockholders Equity |
|
$ |
16,356,147 |
|
|
$ |
15,822,338 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
accompanying notes as they relate to Georgia Power are an integral part of these condensed financial statements.
49
GEORGIA POWER COMPANY
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
SECOND QUARTER 2005 vs. SECOND QUARTER 2004
AND
YEAR-TO-DATE 2005 vs. YEAR-TO-DATE 2004
OVERVIEW
Georgia Power operates as a vertically integrated utility providing electricity to retail customers
within its traditional service area located within the State of Georgia and to wholesale customers
in the Southeast. Many factors affect the opportunities, challenges, and risks of Georgia Powers
business of selling electricity. These factors include the ability to maintain a stable regulatory
environment, to achieve energy sales growth while containing costs, and to recover costs related to
growing demand and increasingly stringent environmental standards.
Georgia Power continues to focus on several key performance indicators. These indicators
include customer satisfaction, peak season equivalent forced outage rate, and return on equity.
For additional information on these indicators, see MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OVERVIEW
Key Performance Indicators of Georgia Power in Item 7 of the Form 10-K.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Earnings
Georgia Powers net income after dividends on preferred stock for the second quarter and
year-to-date 2005 was $157.6 million and $299.9 million, respectively, compared to $155.7 million
and $299.6 million, respectively, for the corresponding periods in 2004. The $1.9 million and $0.3
million increases in the second quarter and year-to-date 2005, respectively, over the corresponding
periods in 2004 were primarily due to higher retail base revenues resulting from the retail rate
increase effective January 1, 2005, offset by increased non-fuel operating expenses. For
additional information on the rate increase, see MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS FUTURE
EARNINGS POTENTIAL FERC and Georgia PSC Matters Retail Rate Case of Georgia Power in Item 7
and Note 3 to the financial statements of Georgia Power under Retail Rate Orders in Item 8 of the
Form 10-K.
50
GEORGIA POWER COMPANY
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Significant income statement items appropriate for discussion include the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (Decrease) |
|
|
|
Second Quarter |
|
Year-To-Date |
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
% |
|
Retail revenues |
|
$ |
27,867 |
|
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
$ |
175,308 |
|
|
|
7.8 |
|
Sales for
resale non-affiliates |
|
|
64,403 |
|
|
|
104.6 |
|
|
|
111,799 |
|
|
|
88.0 |
|
Sales for
resale affiliates |
|
|
5,793 |
|
|
|
11.8 |
|
|
|
(22,718 |
) |
|
|
(22.0 |
) |
Other revenues |
|
|
7,963 |
|
|
|
18.4 |
|
|
|
12,678 |
|
|
|
14.8 |
|
Fuel expense |
|
|
87,830 |
|
|
|
27.1 |
|
|
|
111,882 |
|
|
|
18.4 |
|
Purchased
power expense non-affiliates |
|
|
(32,869 |
) |
|
|
(33.7 |
) |
|
|
(42,584 |
) |
|
|
(26.6 |
) |
Purchased
power expense affiliates |
|
|
1,481 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
86,343 |
|
|
|
31.5 |
|
Depreciation and amortization expense |
|
|
56,457 |
|
|
|
82.4 |
|
|
|
111,820 |
|
|
|
82.1 |
|
Allowance for equity funds used during construction |
|
|
3,235 |
|
|
|
68.8 |
|
|
|
9,145 |
|
|
|
113.6 |
|
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized |
|
|
6,881 |
|
|
|
14.2 |
|
|
|
11,651 |
|
|
|
12.4 |
|
Other income (expense), net |
|
|
8,434 |
|
|
|
150.3 |
|
|
|
9,987 |
|
|
|
99.8 |
|
Retail revenues. The chart below reflects the primary drivers of the 2.3% and 7.8% increases
in retail revenues in the second quarter and year-to-date 2005, respectively, compared to the same
periods in the prior year. Excluding fuel cost recovery revenues, which generally do not affect
net income, retail sales revenue increased by $29.6 million, or 3.7%, and $89.4 million, or 5.9%,
in the second quarter and year-to-date 2005 compared to the corresponding periods in 2004,
primarily due to the retail rate increase effective January 1, 2005. See Note 3 to the financial
statements of Georgia Power under Retail Rate Orders in Item 8 of the Form 10-K for additional
information. During the second quarter 2005, kilowatt-hour energy sales to residential,
commercial, and industrial customers were down by 7.4%, up by 2.8%, and down by 5.6%, respectively,
when compared to the same period in 2004, which resulted in total kilowatt-hour energy sales
decreasing 3% in the second quarter of 2005. Year-to-date kilowatt-hour energy sales to
residential, commercial, and industrial customers were down by 4.8%, up by 2.8%, and down by 4.1%,
resulting in a total kilowatt-hour energy sales decrease of 1.8%. The decreases in kilowatt-hour
energy sales in the second quarter and year-to-date 2005 were due to milder weather in 2005,
despite customer growth of 1.8% in the residential sector. The increase in commercial
kilowatt-hour energy sales in the second quarter and year-to-date 2005 can be attributed to
sustained economic strength, customer growth of 2.4%, and a reclassification of customers from
industrial to commercial to be consistent with the rate structure approved by the Georgia PSC when
compared to the same periods in 2004. Industrial kilowatt-hour energy sales were down primarily as
a result of this reclassification of customers.
Details of retail revenues are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second Quarter |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year-to-Date |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
|
% change |
|
|
(in millions) |
|
|
% change |
|
Retail prior year |
|
$ |
1,199 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,237 |
|
|
|
|
|
Change in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Base rates |
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
3.4 |
|
|
|
85 |
|
|
|
3.8 |
|
Sales growth |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
Weather |
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
|
(1.9 |
) |
|
|
(30 |
) |
|
|
(1.3 |
) |
Fuel cost recovery |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
86 |
|
|
|
3.8 |
|
|
Retail current year |
|
$ |
1,227 |
|
|
|
2.3 |
% |
|
$ |
2,412 |
|
|
|
7.8 |
% |
|
51
GEORGIA POWER COMPANY
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Sales for resale non-affiliates and Purchased power expense non-affiliates. During the
second quarter and year-to-date 2005, sales for resale to non-affiliates increased primarily as a
result of new contracts with these customers effective in January 2005 when compared to the
corresponding periods in 2004 which increased demand for energy by 88.2% and 73.6%, respectively.
The capacity component of these transactions increased $18.3 million and $36.6 million in the
second quarter and year-to-date 2005, respectively, over the same periods in 2004. Purchased power
expense non-affiliates decreased during the second quarter and year-to-date 2005 due to lower
demand resulting from the milder weather and Georgia Powers ability to utilize more economical
self-generation from base load resources. These expenses do not have a significant impact on
earnings since energy expenses are generally offset by energy revenues through Georgia Powers fuel
cost recovery clause.
Sales for resale affiliates and Purchased power expense affiliates. Energy sales to and
purchases from affiliated companies within the Southern Company system will vary depending on
demand and the availability and cost of generating resources at each company. These sales and
purchases are made in accordance with the IIC, as approved by the FERC. These transactions did not
have a significant impact on earnings since this energy is generally sold at marginal cost and
energy purchases are generally offset by energy revenues through Georgia Powers fuel cost recovery
clause. Purchased power from affiliates during the second quarter and year-to-date 2005 when
compared to the same periods in 2004 reflects $12.8 million and $30.4 million, respectively, of
additional capacity expenses under PPAs with Southern Power that went into effect in June 2004.
See Note 7 to the financial statements of Georgia Power under Purchased Power Commitments in Item
8 of the Form 10-K for additional information.
Other revenues. Other revenues increased in the second quarter and year-to-date 2005 as
compared with the same periods in 2004 as a result of $1.7 million and $3.2 million, respectively,
of higher outdoor lighting revenues, $1.3 million and $2.4 million, respectively, of higher
customer fees that went into effect January 2005, and $1.3 million and $2.3 million, respectively,
of higher transmission revenues.
Fuel expense. Fuel expense increased in the second quarter and year-to-date 2005 primarily as
a result of an increase in the average cost of fuel per net kilowatt-hour generated of 16.3% and
15.2%, respectively, when compared to the same periods in the prior year. These expenses do not
have a significant impact on earnings since fuel expenses are generally offset by fuel revenues
through Georgia Powers fuel cost recovery clause. See MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL FERC and Georgia PSC Matters Retail Fuel Cost Recovery and Note (J)
to the Condensed Financial Statements herein for additional information.
Depreciation and amortization expense. Depreciation and amortization expense in the second
quarter and year-to-date 2005 compared to the same periods in the prior year increased primarily
due to the expiration in 2004 of certain provisions in Georgia Powers three-year retail rate plan
ending December 31, 2004 (2001 Retail Rate Plan). In accordance with the 2001 Retail Rate Plan,
Georgia Power amortized an accelerated cost recovery liability as a credit to amortization expense
and recognized new Georgia PSC-certified purchased power costs in rates evenly over the three years
ended December 31, 2004. This treatment resulted in a credit to amortization expense of $47
million and $94 million, respectively, during the second quarter and year-to-date 2004. See Note 3
to the financial statements of Georgia Power under Retail Rate Orders in Item 8 of the Form 10-K
for additional information.
Allowance for equity funds used during construction. The second quarter and year-to-date 2005
increases in AFUDC equity compared to the same periods in the prior year relate primarily to
construction of the McIntosh combined cycle units 10 and 11. See Note 3 to the financial
statements of Georgia Power under Plant McIntosh Construction Project in Item 8 of the Form 10-K
for further information. AFUDC equity is non-taxable;
52
GEORGIA POWER COMPANY
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
however, these increases are not expected to have a significant impact on Georgia Powers effective
tax rate for 2005.
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized. The second quarter and year-to-date 2005
increases in interest expense, net of amounts capitalized relate primarily to the issuance of
additional senior notes since June 2004.
Other income (expense), net. The second quarter and year-to-date 2005 increases in other
income (expense), net compared to the same periods in the prior year relate primarily to $4.5
million and $5.2 million of revenue, respectively, from the flat bill pricing program and the
timing of the employee stock ownership plan contribution made in June 2004 of $3.4 million. The
2005 contribution is expected to occur in the third quarter.
FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL
The results of operations discussed above are not necessarily indicative of Georgia Powers future
earnings potential. The level of Georgia Powers future earnings depends on numerous factors that
affect the opportunities, challenges, and risks of Georgia Powers business of selling electricity.
These factors include Georgia Powers ability to maintain a stable regulatory environment, to
achieve energy sales growth while containing costs, and to recover costs related to growing demand
and increasingly stringent environmental standards. Future earnings in the near term will depend,
in part, upon growth in energy sales which is subject to a number of factors. These factors
include weather, competition, new energy contracts with neighboring utilities, energy conservation
practiced by customers, the price of electricity, the price elasticity of demand, and the rate of
economic growth in Georgia Powers service area. For additional information relating to these
issues, see BUSINESS The SOUTHERN System Risk Factors in Item 1 and MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION
AND ANALYSIS FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL of Georgia Power in Item 7 of the Form 10-K.
Environmental Matters
Compliance costs related to the Clean Air Act and other environmental regulations could affect
earnings if such costs cannot be fully recovered in rates on a timely basis. For additional
information, including information on certain environmental litigation, see MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION
AND ANALYSIS FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL Environmental Matters of Georgia Power in Item 7 and
Note 3 to the financial statements of Georgia Power under New Source Review Actions in Item 8 of
the Form 10-K.
Plant Wansley Environmental Litigation
In March 2005, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit accepted Georgia Powers petition
for review of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgias December 15, 2004
order related to the Plant Wansley environmental litigation. Oral argument on that appeal has not
been scheduled. See MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL
Environmental Matters Plant Wansley Environmental Litigation of Georgia Power in Item 7 and
Note 3 to the financial statements of Georgia Power under Plant Wansley Environmental Litigation
in Item 8 of the Form 10-K and Note (B) to the Condensed Financial Statements herein under Plant
Wansley Environmental Litigation for additional information. The ultimate outcome of this matter
cannot now be determined.
Other Environmental Matters
The EPA issued the final Clean Air Interstate Rule on March 10, 2005. The rule addresses sulfur
dioxide (SO2) and nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions that contribute to
nonattainment of the eight-hour ozone and fine particulate
53
GEORGIA POWER COMPANY
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
matter National Ambient Air Quality Standards. Twenty-eight eastern states, including the State of
Georgia, are subject to the fine particulate and/or the eight-hour ozone requirements set forth
within the rule. The rule may require additional reductions of NOx and/or
SO2 to be achieved by the installation of additional controls at Georgia Powers
facilities or through the purchase of allowances. The impact of this final rule on Georgia Power
will, however, depend on the outcome of legal challenges and development and implementation of
applicable state regulations and therefore cannot be determined at this time.
On March 15, 2005, the EPA announced the final Clean Air Mercury Rule, selecting a
cap-and-trade approach to be implemented in two phases, 2010 and 2018. The rule sets a permanent
cap on emissions at the 2018 level and provides for an emissions allowance trading market. The
impact of this final rule on Georgia Power will depend on the outcome of legal challenges and
development and implementation of applicable state regulations and therefore cannot be determined
at this time.
On June 15, 2005, the EPA issued final rules addressing Best Available Retrofit Technology
(BART) standards under the Regional Haze Program. States must develop regulations to implement the
federal regional haze requirements, including BART standards, by December 17, 2007. The impact of
the final BART rules on Georgia Power will depend on the outcome of any litigation over the final
rules and the development and implementation of the applicable state regulations and therefore
cannot be determined at this time.
On June 14 and 15, 2005, the EPA published final rules approving the redesignation of the
Atlanta metro area to attainment under the one-hour ground-level ozone standard.
FERC and Georgia PSC Matters
Market-Based Rate Authority
See MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL FERC and Georgia
PSC Matters Market-Based Rate Authority of Georgia Power in Item 7 and Note 3 to the financial
statements of Georgia Power under Market-Based Rate Authority in Item 8 of the Form 10-K for
information on the FERCs April 2004 order adopting a new interim analysis for measuring generation
market power and a proceeding initiated by the FERC in December 2004 to assess Southern Companys
generation dominance within its retail service territory. Georgia Power has authorization from the
FERC to sell power to non-affiliates at market-based prices. Georgia Power, through SCS as agent,
also has FERC authority to make short-term opportunity sales at market rates. Specific FERC
approval must be obtained with respect to a market-based contract with an affiliate. On February
15, 2005, Southern Company submitted additional information related to generation dominance in its
retail service territory. On July 8, 2005, the FERC initiated a hearing before an administrative
law judge to review the generation market power issues. Any new market-based rate transactions in
Southern Companys retail service territory entered into after February 27, 2005 will be subject to
refund to the level of the default cost-based rates, pending the outcome of the proceeding. In the
event that the FERCs default mitigation measures are ultimately applied, Georgia Power may be
required to charge cost-based rates for certain wholesale sales in the Southern Company retail
service territory, which may be lower than negotiated market-based rates. The impact of such sales
through June 30, 2005 is not material to Georgia Powers net income. The final outcome of this
matter will depend on the form in which the final methodology for assessing generation market power
and mitigation rules may be ultimately adopted and cannot be determined at this time.
In addition, on May 5, 2005, the FERC issued an order expanding the generation market power
proceeding initiated in December 2004 to include an investigation of whether Southern Company
satisfies the other three parts of the FERCs market-based rate analysis: transmission market
power, barriers to entry, and affiliate abuse or reciprocal dealing. The FERC established a new
refund period related to this expanded investigation. Any
54
GEORGIA POWER COMPANY
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
and all new market-based rate transactions involving any Southern Company subsidiary will be
subject to refund to the extent the FERC orders lower rates beginning July 19, 2005. The FERC also
directed that this expanded proceeding be held in abeyance pending the outcome of the proceeding on
the IIC discussed below.
Southern Company and its subsidiaries believe that there is no meritorious basis for these
allegations and intend to vigorously defend themselves in the proceeding. However, the final
outcome of this matter, including any remedies to be applied in the event of an adverse ruling in
this proceeding, cannot now be determined.
Intercompany Interchange Contract
Also, on May 5, 2005, the FERC initiated a new proceeding to examine (1) the provisions of the IIC
among Alabama Power, Georgia Power, Gulf Power, Mississippi Power, Savannah Electric, Southern
Power, and SCS, as agent, under the terms of which the power pool of Southern Company is operated,
and, in particular, the propriety of the continued inclusion of Southern Power as a party to the
IIC, (2) whether any parties to the IIC have violated the FERCs standards of conduct applicable to
utility companies that are transmission providers, and (3) whether Southern Companys code of
conduct defining Southern Power as a system company rather than a marketing affiliate is just
and reasonable. In 2000, in connection with the formation of Southern Power, the FERC authorized
Southern Powers inclusion in the IIC. The FERC also previously approved Southern Companys code
of conduct. The FERC order directs that the administrative law judge who presided over the
McIntosh PPA proceeding be assigned to preside over the hearing in this proceeding and that the
testimony and exhibits presented in that proceeding be preserved to the extent appropriate. See
Note 3 to the financial statements of Georgia Power under Plant McIntosh Construction Project in
Item 8 of the Form 10-K for further information on the McIntosh PPA proceeding. Effective July 19,
2005, revenues from transactions under the IIC involving any Southern Company subsidiary will be
subject to refund to the extent the FERC orders any changes to the IIC.
Southern Company and its subsidiaries believe that there is no meritorious basis for these
allegations and intend to vigorously defend themselves in the proceeding. However, the final
outcome of this matter, including any remedies to be applied in the event of an adverse ruling in
this proceeding, cannot now be determined.
Generation Interconnection Agreements
See MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL FERC and Georgia PSC
Matters Generation Interconnection Agreements of Georgia Power in Item 7 of the Form 10-K for
information on the FERCs Order 2003 related to standardization of generation interconnection
agreements and procedures. The FERC has indicated that Order 2003, which was effective January 20,
2004, is to be applied prospectively to interconnection agreements. Subsidiaries of Tenaska, Inc., as
counterparties to previously executed interconnection agreements with Georgia Power and another
Southern Company subsidiary, have filed complaints at the FERC requesting that the FERC modify the
agreements and that Georgia Power refund a total of $7.9 million previously paid for
interconnection facilities, with interest. Georgia Power has opposed such relief, and the
proceedings are still pending. The impact of Order 2003 and its subsequent rehearings on Georgia
Power and the final results of these matters cannot be determined at this time.
Retail Fuel Cost Recovery
On May 17, 2005, the Georgia PSC voted to allow Georgia Power to increase customer fuel rates to
recover estimated under-recovered fuel costs of approximately $508 million as of May 31, 2005 over
the period from June 1, 2005 through May 31, 2009, as well as future projected fuel costs based on
a June 2005 through May 2006 test period. The new fuel rate became effective June 1, 2005 and
represents an average annual increase in
55
GEORGIA POWER COMPANY
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
revenues of approximately 9.5%, or approximately $473 million. Based on the order, a portion of
the under-recovered regulatory clause revenues was reclassified from current assets to deferred
charges and other assets on the balance sheet. At June 30, 2005, Georgia Powers under-recovered
fuel costs totaled $516 million, of which $363 million is classified as deferred charges and other
assets. See Note 3 to the financial statements of Georgia Power under Fuel Cost Recovery in Item
8 of the Form 10-K and Note (J) to the Condensed Financial Statements herein for additional
information.
Other Matters
In
July 2005, the U.S. Congress passed the Energy Policy Act of 2005
(Energy Act), which President Bush is expected to sign into law in
early August 2005. Among other things, the Energy Act includes
various tax subsidies for electric utilities and provisions repealing
the PUHCA. The Energy Act also amends federal energy laws and
provides the FERC with new oversight responsibilities for the
electric utility industry. The implementation of the Energy Act
requires proceedings at the state level and the development of
regulations by the FERC, as well as other federal agencies. Georgia
Power is still reviewing the legislation; however, its impacts will
depend on the promulgation and implementation of final rules and
cannot be determined at this time.
Georgia Power is subject to certain claims and legal actions arising in the ordinary course of
business. In addition, Georgia Powers business activities are subject to extensive governmental
regulation related to public health and the environment. Litigation over environmental issues and
claims of various types, including property damage, personal injury, and citizen enforcement of
environmental requirements, has increased generally throughout the United States. In particular,
personal injury claims for damages caused by alleged exposure to hazardous materials have become
more frequent. The ultimate outcome of such litigation against Georgia Power cannot be predicted at
this time; however, management does not anticipate that the liabilities, if any, arising from such
current proceedings would have a material adverse effect on Georgia Powers financial statements.
See the Notes to the Condensed Financial Statements herein for discussion of various
contingencies and other matters which may affect future earnings potential.
ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Application of Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Georgia Power prepares its financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States. Significant accounting policies are described in Note 1 to the
financial statements of Georgia Power in Item 8 of the Form 10-K. In the application of these
policies, certain estimates are made that may have a material impact on Georgia Powers results of
operations and related disclosures. Different assumptions and measurements could produce estimates
that are significantly different from those recorded in the financial statements. Also see
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS ACCOUNTING POLICIES Application of Critical Accounting
Policies and Estimates of Georgia Power in Item 7 of the Form 10-K for a complete discussion of
Georgia Powers critical accounting policies and estimates related to Electric Utility Regulation,
Contingent Obligations, and Unbilled Revenues.
New Accounting Standards
FASB Statement No. 123R, Share-Based Payments, was issued in December 2004. This statement
requires that compensation cost relating to share-based payment transactions be recognized in
financial statements. That cost will be measured based on the grant date fair value of the equity
instruments issued. In April 2005, the SEC amended the compliance dates for FASB Statement No.
123R. For Georgia Power, this statement is now effective beginning January 1, 2006. Although the
compensation expense calculation required under the revised statement differs slightly, the impacts
on Georgia Powers financial statements are expected to be similar to the
56
GEORGIA POWER COMPANY
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
pro forma disclosures included in Note 1 to the financial statements of Georgia Power under Stock
Options in Item 8 of the Form 10-K and in Note (C) to the Condensed Financial Statements herein.
FASB Interpretation No. 47 (FIN 47), Accounting for Conditional Asset Retirement Obligations,
was issued in March 2005. This interpretation requires that asset retirement obligations be
recorded when a legal obligation exists even though the timing and/or the method of settlement are
conditional on a future event. For Georgia Power, FIN 47 is effective no later than December 31,
2005. Georgia Power is currently assessing the impact of FIN 47 on its balance sheet; however,
adoption is not currently expected to have a material impact on Georgia Powers income statement.
In December 2004, the FASB issued Staff Position No. 109-1 (FSP 109-1), Application of FASB
Statement No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes, to the Tax Deduction on Qualified Production
Activities provided by the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004, which requires that the generation
deduction for utilities be accounted for as a special tax deduction rather than as a tax rate
reduction. Georgia Power adopted FSP 109-1 in the first quarter of 2005 with no material impact on
its financial statements.
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND LIQUIDITY
Overview
Georgia Powers financial condition remained stable at June 30, 2005. Net cash flow from
operating activities totaled $357 million for the year-to-date 2005, compared to $398 million for
the same period in 2004. The decrease of $41 million in 2005 is primarily the result of higher
fuel costs, which are recoverable in future periods and are reflected in the balance sheets as
under recovered regulatory clause revenues. During year-to-date 2005, gross property additions
were $408.1 million. These additions were primarily related to the construction of Plant McIntosh
Units 10 and 11, transmission and distribution facilities, purchases of nuclear fuel, and purchases
of equipment to comply with environmental standards. The majority of funds for these additions and
other capital requirements were derived primarily from operating activities and financing
activities. See Georgia Powers Condensed Statements of Cash Flows herein for further details.
Capital Requirements and Contractual Obligations
See MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS FINANCIAL CONDITION AND LIQUIDITY Capital
Requirements and Contractual Obligations of Georgia Power in Item 7 of the Form 10-K for a
description of Georgia Powers capital requirements for its construction program, lease
obligations, purchase commitments, and trust funding requirements. Approximately $403 million will
be required by June 30, 2006 for redemptions and maturities of long-term debt.
Sources of Capital
Georgia Power plans to obtain the funds required for construction and other purposes from sources
similar to those used in the past, including funds from operations and new security issuances. The
amount, type, and timing of any financings, if needed, will depend upon maintenance of adequate earnings, regulatory
approval, prevailing market conditions, and other factors. See MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND
ANALYSIS FINANCIAL CONDITION AND LIQUIDITY Sources of Capital of Georgia Power in Item 7 of
the Form 10-K for additional information.
At June 30, 2005, Georgia Powers current liabilities exceeded current assets because of the
continued use of short-term debt as a funding source to meet cash needs, which can fluctuate
significantly due to the
57
GEORGIA POWER COMPANY
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
seasonality of the business. To meet short-term cash needs and contingencies, Georgia Power had at
June 30, 2005 approximately $9 million of cash and cash equivalents and $780 million of unused
credit arrangements with banks. Of these facilities, $70.4 million expire in 2006, $350 million
expire in 2007, and $360 million expire in 2010. The facilities that expire in 2006 contain
provisions allowing two year term loans executable at expiration. Georgia Power expects to renew
its credit facilities, as needed, prior to expiration. These unused credit arrangements provide
liquidity support to Georgia Powers obligations with respect to variable rate pollution control
bonds and commercial paper. Georgia Power may also meet short-term cash needs through a Southern
Company subsidiary organized to issue and sell commercial paper and extendible commercial notes at
the request and for the benefit of Georgia Power and other Southern Company subsidiaries. At June
30, 2005, Georgia Power had approximately $380 million of commercial paper and no extendible
commercial notes outstanding. Management believes that the need for working capital can be
adequately met by utilizing commercial paper programs and lines of credit without maintaining large
cash balances.
Credit Rating Risk
Georgia Power does not have any credit arrangements that would require material changes in payment
schedules or terminations as a result of a credit rating downgrade. There are certain contracts
that could require collateral, but not accelerated payment, in the event of a credit rating change
to BBB- or Baa3 or below. Generally, collateral may be provided for by a Southern Company
guaranty, letter of credit, or cash. These contracts are primarily for physical electricity
purchases and sales. At June 30, 2005, the maximum potential collateral requirements at a BBB- or
Baa3 rating were approximately $8 million. The maximum potential collateral requirements at a
rating below BBB- or Baa3 were approximately $246 million. Georgia Power is also party to certain
derivative agreements that could require collateral and/or accelerated payment in the event of a
credit rating change to below investment grade. These agreements are primarily for natural gas
price and interest rate risk management activities. At June 30, 2005, Georgia Power had no
material exposure related to these agreements.
Market Price Risk
Georgia Powers market risk exposures relative to interest rate changes have not
changed materially compared with the December 31, 2004 reporting period. In addition, Georgia
Power is not aware of any facts or circumstances that would significantly affect such exposures in
the near term.
Due to cost-based rate regulations, Georgia Power has limited exposure to market volatility in
interest rates, commodity fuel prices, and prices of electricity. To mitigate residual risks
relative to movements in electricity prices, Georgia Power enters into fixed-price contracts for
the purchase and sale of electricity through the wholesale electricity market. Georgia Power has
also implemented a fuel hedging program at the instruction of the Georgia PSC.
58
GEORGIA POWER COMPANY
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The fair value of derivative energy contracts at June 30, 2005 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second Quarter |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
Year-to-Date |
|
|
|
Changes |
|
|
Changes |
|
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Contracts beginning of period |
|
$ |
37,132 |
|
|
$ |
5,777 |
|
Contracts realized or settled |
|
|
(14,212 |
) |
|
|
(12,962 |
) |
New contracts at inception |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in valuation techniques |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current period changes (a) |
|
|
(4,053 |
) |
|
|
26,052 |
|
|
Contracts at June 30, 2005 |
|
$ |
18,867 |
|
|
$ |
18,867 |
|
|
(a) |
|
Current period changes also include the changes in fair value of new contracts
entered into during the period. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Source of June 30, 2005 |
|
|
|
Valuation Prices |
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
Maturity |
|
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Year 1 |
|
|
1-3 Years |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
Actively quoted |
|
$ |
18,921 |
|
|
$ |
12,391 |
|
|
$ |
6,530 |
|
External sources |
|
|
(54 |
) |
|
|
(54 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Models and other methods |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contracts at June 30, 2005 |
|
$ |
18,867 |
|
|
$ |
12,337 |
|
|
$ |
6,530 |
|
|
For additional information, see MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
LIQUIDITY Market Price Risk of Georgia Power in Item 7 and Notes 1 and 6 to the financial
statements of Georgia Power under Financial Instruments in Item 8 of the Form 10-K and Note (F)
to the Condensed Financial Statements herein.
Financing Activities
In January 2005, Georgia Power issued $250 million of Series X 5.70% Senior Notes due January 15,
2045. Proceeds from the sale were used to repay at maturity $250 million principal amount of
Series L Floating Rate Senior Notes in February 2005.
In April 2005, Georgia Power incurred obligations in connection with the issuance of $85
million 4.75% pollution control revenue bonds. Proceeds from the sale were used to repay
obligations in connection with $85 million of 5.40% pollution control revenue bonds in May 2005.
Also in April, Georgia Power issued $125 million of Series Y 5.80% Senior Notes due April 15, 2035.
Proceeds were used to repay a portion of Georgia Powers short-term indebtedness and for other
corporate purposes.
Also, in April 2005, Georgia Power entered into an interest rate swap designed to mitigate its
exposure to adverse interest rate movements with respect to the anticipated Series Y Senior Note
issuance. In connection with the issuance of such senior notes, Georgia Power terminated the swap
at a fair value loss of $0.3 million, which will be amortized over a 10-year period.
59
GEORGIA POWER COMPANY
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Further, in April 2005, Georgia Power converted the interest rate on $14 million in pollution
control revenue bonds from one long-term interest rate to another long-term interest rate. The
conversion reduced the interest rate from 5.0% to 4.35%.
In June 2005, Georgia Power incurred obligations in connection with the issuance of $100
million 4.625% pollution control revenue bonds. Proceeds were held by the trustee and were used to
repay obligations in connection with $100 million 5.25% pollution control revenue bonds in July
2005.
In the first six months of 2005, Georgia Power entered into two derivative transactions to
reduce its exposure to interest rate risk. The transactions consisted of a $300 million hedge of an
anticipated senior note issuance in 2007 and an interest rate swap on $300 million of tax-exempt
pollution control bonds.
In addition to any financings that may be necessary to meet capital requirements and
contractual obligations, Georgia Power plans to continue, when economically feasible, a program to
retire higher-cost securities and replace these obligations with lower-cost capital.
60
GULF POWER COMPANY
61
GULF POWER COMPANY
CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF INCOME (UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months |
|
|
For the Six Months |
|
|
|
Ended June 30, |
|
|
Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Operating Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retail revenues |
|
$ |
207,110 |
|
|
$ |
191,189 |
|
|
$ |
369,392 |
|
|
$ |
356,273 |
|
Sales for resale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-affiliates |
|
|
19,614 |
|
|
|
18,470 |
|
|
|
39,326 |
|
|
|
37,958 |
|
Affiliates |
|
|
14,443 |
|
|
|
21,964 |
|
|
|
47,043 |
|
|
|
42,659 |
|
Other revenues |
|
|
10,130 |
|
|
|
9,547 |
|
|
|
20,133 |
|
|
|
19,199 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating revenues |
|
|
251,297 |
|
|
|
241,170 |
|
|
|
475,894 |
|
|
|
456,089 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fuel |
|
|
94,814 |
|
|
|
90,778 |
|
|
|
187,444 |
|
|
|
169,194 |
|
Purchased power |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-affiliates |
|
|
4,958 |
|
|
|
11,724 |
|
|
|
10,066 |
|
|
|
18,157 |
|
Affiliates |
|
|
10,829 |
|
|
|
7,843 |
|
|
|
16,841 |
|
|
|
15,271 |
|
Other operations |
|
|
41,148 |
|
|
|
36,430 |
|
|
|
74,917 |
|
|
|
69,448 |
|
Maintenance |
|
|
16,286 |
|
|
|
16,773 |
|
|
|
33,885 |
|
|
|
32,979 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
21,333 |
|
|
|
20,722 |
|
|
|
42,082 |
|
|
|
41,274 |
|
Taxes other than income taxes |
|
|
17,776 |
|
|
|
17,076 |
|
|
|
35,277 |
|
|
|
34,139 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
207,144 |
|
|
|
201,346 |
|
|
|
400,512 |
|
|
|
380,462 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Income |
|
|
44,153 |
|
|
|
39,824 |
|
|
|
75,382 |
|
|
|
75,627 |
|
Other Income and (Expense): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for equity funds used during construction |
|
|
310 |
|
|
|
345 |
|
|
|
1,029 |
|
|
|
872 |
|
Interest income |
|
|
444 |
|
|
|
152 |
|
|
|
699 |
|
|
|
287 |
|
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized |
|
|
(8,991 |
) |
|
|
(8,138 |
) |
|
|
(17,251 |
) |
|
|
(16,032 |
) |
Interest expense to affiliate trusts |
|
|
(1,147 |
) |
|
|
(1,147 |
) |
|
|
(2,295 |
) |
|
|
(1,147 |
) |
Distributions on mandatorily redeemable preferred
securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,113 |
) |
Other income (expense), net |
|
|
(470 |
) |
|
|
(588 |
) |
|
|
(997 |
) |
|
|
(1,232 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income and (expense) |
|
|
(9,854 |
) |
|
|
(9,376 |
) |
|
|
(18,815 |
) |
|
|
(18,365 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings Before Income Taxes |
|
|
34,299 |
|
|
|
30,448 |
|
|
|
56,567 |
|
|
|
57,262 |
|
Income taxes |
|
|
12,787 |
|
|
|
11,392 |
|
|
|
20,355 |
|
|
|
21,313 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income |
|
|
21,512 |
|
|
|
19,056 |
|
|
|
36,212 |
|
|
|
35,949 |
|
Dividends on Preferred Stock |
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
108 |
|
|
|
108 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income After Dividends on Preferred Stock |
|
$ |
21,458 |
|
|
$ |
19,002 |
|
|
$ |
36,104 |
|
|
$ |
35,841 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months |
|
|
For the Six Months |
|
|
|
Ended June 30, |
|
|
Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Net Income After Dividends on Preferred Stock |
|
$ |
21,458 |
|
|
$ |
19,002 |
|
|
$ |
36,104 |
|
|
$ |
35,841 |
|
Other comprehensive income (loss): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in fair value of marketable securities, net
of tax
of $40 and $40, respectively |
|
|
|
|
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63 |
|
Reclassification adjustment for amounts included in net income,
net of tax of $32, $31, $63 and $62, respectively |
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
101 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME |
|
$ |
21,507 |
|
|
$ |
19,116 |
|
|
$ |
36,204 |
|
|
$ |
36,005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes as they relate to Gulf Power are an integral part of these condensed financial statements.
62
GULF POWER COMPANY
CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Six Months |
|
|
|
Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Operating Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
36,212 |
|
|
$ |
35,949 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income
to net cash provided from operating activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
45,007 |
|
|
|
44,278 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
(2,553 |
) |
|
|
4,097 |
|
Pension, postretirement, and other employee benefits |
|
|
1,123 |
|
|
|
425 |
|
Tax benefit of stock options |
|
|
2,659 |
|
|
|
988 |
|
Other, net |
|
|
5,571 |
|
|
|
(1,880 |
) |
Changes in certain current assets and liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables, net |
|
|
(3,394 |
) |
|
|
(7,591 |
) |
Fossil fuel stock |
|
|
(17,991 |
) |
|
|
(6,235 |
) |
Materials and supplies |
|
|
1,270 |
|
|
|
781 |
|
Other current assets |
|
|
10,301 |
|
|
|
338 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
(38,761 |
) |
|
|
6,155 |
|
Accrued taxes |
|
|
6,256 |
|
|
|
17,684 |
|
Accrued compensation |
|
|
(7,837 |
) |
|
|
(3,457 |
) |
Other current liabilities |
|
|
7,987 |
|
|
|
6,602 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided from operating activities |
|
|
45,850 |
|
|
|
98,134 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross property additions |
|
|
(66,024 |
) |
|
|
(66,828 |
) |
Cost of removal net of salvage |
|
|
(2,668 |
) |
|
|
(3,935 |
) |
Other |
|
|
(19,009 |
) |
|
|
(7,803 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used for investing activities |
|
|
(87,701 |
) |
|
|
(78,566 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in notes payable, net |
|
|
13,710 |
|
|
|
(32,671 |
) |
Proceeds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior notes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,000 |
|
Capital contributions from parent company |
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,000 |
|
Payment of preferred stock dividends |
|
|
(108 |
) |
|
|
(108 |
) |
Payment of common stock dividends |
|
|
(34,200 |
) |
|
|
(35,000 |
) |
Other |
|
|
(270 |
) |
|
|
(1,509 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used for financing activities |
|
|
(20,868 |
) |
|
|
(9,288 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Change in Cash and Cash Equivalents |
|
|
(62,719 |
) |
|
|
10,280 |
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Period |
|
|
64,829 |
|
|
|
2,548 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Period |
|
$ |
2,110 |
|
|
$ |
12,828 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental Cash Flow Information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid during the period for |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest (net of $454 and $385 capitalized for 2005 and 2004, respectively) |
|
$ |
17,814 |
|
|
$ |
15,652 |
|
Income taxes (net of refunds) |
|
$ |
14,419 |
|
|
$ |
5,008 |
|
The accompanying notes as they relate to Gulf Power are an integral part of these condensed financial statements.
63
GULF POWER COMPANY
CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS (UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At June 30, |
|
|
At December 31, |
|
Assets |
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Current Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
2,110 |
|
|
$ |
64,829 |
|
Receivables |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer accounts receivable |
|
|
53,073 |
|
|
|
44,255 |
|
Unbilled revenues |
|
|
45,203 |
|
|
|
35,889 |
|
Under recovered regulatory clause revenues |
|
|
1,361 |
|
|
|
9,283 |
|
Other accounts and notes receivable |
|
|
12,095 |
|
|
|
7,177 |
|
Affiliated companies |
|
|
3,227 |
|
|
|
16,218 |
|
Accumulated provision for uncollectible accounts |
|
|
(885 |
) |
|
|
(2,144 |
) |
Fossil fuel stock, at average cost |
|
|
50,990 |
|
|
|
32,999 |
|
Vacation pay |
|
|
5,446 |
|
|
|
5,446 |
|
Materials and supplies, at average cost |
|
|
35,491 |
|
|
|
36,761 |
|
Prepaid income taxes |
|
|
33,540 |
|
|
|
34,812 |
|
Hurricane Ivan cost recovery |
|
|
28,152 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other regulatory assets current |
|
|
2,571 |
|
|
|
7,097 |
|
Other |
|
|
10,680 |
|
|
|
5,198 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
283,054 |
|
|
|
297,820 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, Plant, and Equipment: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In service |
|
|
2,455,105 |
|
|
|
2,367,189 |
|
Less accumulated provision for depreciation |
|
|
847,215 |
|
|
|
844,617 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,607,890 |
|
|
|
1,522,572 |
|
Construction work in progress |
|
|
15,894 |
|
|
|
74,004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total property, plant, and equipment |
|
|
1,623,784 |
|
|
|
1,596,576 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Property and Investments |
|
|
6,577 |
|
|
|
6,425 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred Charges and Other Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred charges related to income taxes |
|
|
17,198 |
|
|
|
17,566 |
|
Prepaid pension costs |
|
|
45,431 |
|
|
|
45,384 |
|
Unamortized debt issuance expense |
|
|
6,528 |
|
|
|
6,615 |
|
Unamortized loss on reacquired debt |
|
|
18,330 |
|
|
|
19,197 |
|
Other regulatory assets |
|
|
78,558 |
|
|
|
107,994 |
|
Other |
|
|
13,503 |
|
|
|
13,086 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred charges and other assets |
|
|
179,548 |
|
|
|
209,842 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets |
|
$ |
2,092,963 |
|
|
$ |
2,110,663 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes as they relate to Gulf Power are an integral part of these condensed financial statements.
64
GULF POWER COMPANY
CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS (UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At June 30, |
|
|
At December 31, |
|
Liabilities and Stockholder's Equity |
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Current Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities due within one year |
|
$ |
112,075 |
|
|
$ |
100,000 |
|
Notes payable |
|
|
63,710 |
|
|
|
50,000 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Affiliated |
|
|
30,113 |
|
|
|
35,359 |
|
Other |
|
|
25,211 |
|
|
|
77,452 |
|
Customer deposits |
|
|
18,450 |
|
|
|
18,470 |
|
Accrued taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,927 |
|
Other |
|
|
15,506 |
|
|
|
9,250 |
|
Accrued interest |
|
|
7,111 |
|
|
|
7,665 |
|
Accrued vacation pay |
|
|
5,446 |
|
|
|
5,446 |
|
Accrued compensation |
|
|
9,861 |
|
|
|
16,989 |
|
Other regulatory liabilities current |
|
|
20,423 |
|
|
|
7,821 |
|
Other |
|
|
4,433 |
|
|
|
5,167 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
312,339 |
|
|
|
335,546 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term Debt |
|
|
539,168 |
|
|
|
550,989 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term Debt Payable to Affiliated Trusts |
|
|
72,166 |
|
|
|
72,166 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred Credits and Other Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated deferred income taxes |
|
|
234,897 |
|
|
|
229,909 |
|
Deferred credits related to income taxes |
|
|
21,991 |
|
|
|
23,354 |
|
Accumulated deferred investment tax credits |
|
|
17,529 |
|
|
|
18,489 |
|
Employee benefit obligations |
|
|
56,040 |
|
|
|
54,869 |
|
Other cost of removal obligations |
|
|
161,263 |
|
|
|
155,831 |
|
Miscellaneous regulatory liabilities |
|
|
6,615 |
|
|
|
2,048 |
|
Other |
|
|
70,022 |
|
|
|
71,192 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred credits and other liabilities |
|
|
568,357 |
|
|
|
555,692 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities |
|
|
1,492,030 |
|
|
|
1,514,393 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred Stock |
|
|
4,098 |
|
|
|
4,098 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stockholders Equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, without par value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Authorized - 992,717 shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding - 992,717 shares |
|
|
38,060 |
|
|
|
38,060 |
|
Paid-in capital |
|
|
400,054 |
|
|
|
397,396 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
161,486 |
|
|
|
159,581 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
|
(2,765 |
) |
|
|
(2,865 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total common stockholders equity |
|
|
596,835 |
|
|
|
592,172 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities and Stockholders Equity |
|
$ |
2,092,963 |
|
|
$ |
2,110,663 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes as they relate to Gulf Power are an integral part of these condensed financial statements.
65
GULF
POWER COMPANY
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
SECOND QUARTER 2005 vs. SECOND QUARTER 2004
AND
YEAR-TO-DATE 2005 vs. YEAR-TO-DATE 2004
OVERVIEW
Gulf Power operates as a vertically integrated utility providing electricity to customers within
its traditional service area located in northwest Florida and to wholesale customers in the
Southeast. Prices for electricity provided by Gulf Power to retail customers are set by the
Florida PSC. Many factors affect the opportunities, challenges, and risks of Gulf Powers business
of selling electricity. These factors include the ability to maintain a stable regulatory
environment, to achieve energy sales growth while containing costs, and to recover costs related to
growing demand and increasingly stringent environmental standards.
Gulf Power continues to focus on several key performance indicators. These indicators include
customer satisfaction, peak season equivalent forced outage rate, and return on equity. For
additional information on these indicators, see MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OVERVIEW -
Key Performance Indicators of Gulf Power in Item 7 of the Form 10-K.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Earnings
Gulf Powers net income after dividends on preferred stock for the second quarter and year-to-date
2005 was $21.5 million and $36.1 million, respectively, compared to $19.0 million and $35.8
million, respectively, for the corresponding periods in 2004. Earnings in the second quarter and
year-to-date 2005 increased by $2.5 million, or 12.9%, and $0.3 million, or 0.7%, respectively,
primarily due to lower non-fuel operating expenses, excluding expenses related to Hurricane Ivan,
which are offset by revenues and do not affect earnings.
Significant income statement items appropriate for discussion include the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (Decrease) |
|
|
Second Quarter |
|
Year-To-Date |
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
% change |
|
(in thousands) |
|
% change |
Retail revenues |
|
$ |
15,921 |
|
|
|
8.3 |
|
|
$ |
13,119 |
|
|
|
3.7 |
|
Sales for resale affiliates |
|
|
(7,521 |
) |
|
|
(34.2 |
) |
|
|
4,384 |
|
|
|
10.3 |
|
Fuel expense |
|
|
4,036 |
|
|
|
4.4 |
|
|
|
18,250 |
|
|
|
10.8 |
|
Purchased power expense non-affiliates |
|
|
(6,766 |
) |
|
|
(57.7 |
) |
|
|
(8,091 |
) |
|
|
(44.6 |
) |
Purchased power expense affiliates |
|
|
2,986 |
|
|
|
38.1 |
|
|
|
1,570 |
|
|
|
10.3 |
|
Other operations expense |
|
|
4,718 |
|
|
|
13.0 |
|
|
|
5,469 |
|
|
|
7.9 |
|
Retail revenues. The chart below reflects the primary drivers of the 8.3% increase in retail
revenues in the second quarter and 3.7% increase year-to-date 2005 when compared to the
corresponding periods in the prior year. Excluding revenues related to fuel and other cost
recovery, which do not affect net income, retail revenues were relatively flat for the second
quarter 2005 and decreased by $4.4 million, or 1.2%, year-to-date 2005 as compared to the
corresponding periods in 2004. Retail energy sales for second quarter and year-to-date 2005 from
residential, commercial, and industrial customers remained mostly constant as compared to the same
periods in 2004. Other cost recovery for 2005 includes $6.5 million of revenues related to the
recovery of
66
GULF POWER COMPANY
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
expenses for Hurricane Ivan as approved by the Florida PSC. See Note (K) to the Condensed
Financial Statements herein and Note 3 to the financial statement of Gulf Power under Retail
Regulatory Matters in Item 8 of the Form 10-K for additional information.
Details of retail revenues are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second Quarter |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year-to-Date |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
% |
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
% |
|
Retail prior year |
|
$ |
191,189 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
356,273 |
|
|
|
|
|
Change in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales growth |
|
|
1,893 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
3,396 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
Weather |
|
|
(1,943 |
) |
|
|
(1.0 |
) |
|
|
(7,755 |
) |
|
|
(2.2 |
) |
Fuel cost recovery |
|
|
6,088 |
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
|
5,708 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
Other cost recovery |
|
|
9,883 |
|
|
|
5.1 |
|
|
|
11,770 |
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
Retail current year |
|
$ |
207,110 |
|
|
|
8.3 |
|
|
$ |
369,392 |
|
|
|
3.7 |
|
|
Sales for resale affiliates and Purchased power expense affiliates. Revenues from sales
for resale to affiliates and purchases of energy from affiliates will vary depending on demand and
the availability and cost of generating resources at each company within the Southern Company
system. These affiliate sales and purchases are made in accordance with the IIC, as approved by
the FERC. These transactions do not have a significant impact on earnings since this energy is
generally sold at marginal cost and energy purchases are generally offset by energy revenues
through Gulf Powers fuel cost recovery mechanism. The decrease in sales for resale to affiliates
and increased purchased power from affiliates in the second quarter 2005 is due to outages for Gulf
Power generating units which reduced availability. In addition, milder weather in the Southern
Company service territory reduced demand. The increase in sales for resale to affiliates for
year-to-date 2005 is primarily due to increased sales of available generation in the first quarter
2005 at a higher unit cost resulting from higher fuel prices.
Fuel expense. In the second quarter and year-to-date 2005, fuel expense was higher than the
same period in 2004 primarily due to an 11.6% increase in coal prices and a 14.0% increase in
natural gas prices year-to-date. Since energy expenses are generally offset by energy revenues
through Gulf Powers fuel cost recovery mechanism, these expenses do not have a material impact on
net income.
Purchased power expense non-affiliates. The decreases in the second quarter and
year-to-date 2005, as compared to the corresponding periods in 2004, are primarily the result of an
increase in available Southern Company system generation. Since energy expenses are generally
offset by revenues through Gulf Powers fuel cost recovery mechanism, these expenses do not have a
significant impact on net income.
Other operations expense. The increases in other operations expense during the second quarter
and year-to-date 2005, as compared to the same periods in 2004, are primarily due to expenses
related to Hurricane Ivan as approved by the Florida PSC. In April 2005, Gulf Power began billing
retail customers approximately $2 million monthly to recover these expenses. See Note (K) to the
Condensed Financial Statements herein and Note 3 to the financial statements of Gulf Power under
Retail Regulatory Matters in Item 8 of the Form 10-K for additional information.
67
GULF POWER COMPANY
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL
The results of operations discussed above are not necessarily indicative of Gulf Powers future
earnings potential. The level of Gulf Powers future earnings depends on numerous factors that
affect the opportunities, challenges, and risks of Gulf Powers business of selling electricity.
These factors include Gulf Powers ability to maintain a stable regulatory environment, to achieve
energy sales growth while containing costs, and to recover costs related to growing demand and
increasingly stringent environmental standards. Future earnings in the near term will depend, in
part, upon growth in energy sales, which is subject to a number of factors. These factors include
weather, competition, new energy contracts with neighboring utilities, energy conservation
practiced by customers, the price of electricity, the price elasticity of demand, and the rate of
economic growth in Gulf Powers service area. For additional information relating to these issues,
see BUSINESS The SOUTHERN System Risk Factors in Item 1 and MANAGEMENTS
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL of Gulf Power in Item 7 of the Form 10-K.
Environmental Matters
Compliance costs related to the Clean Air Act and other environmental regulations could affect
earnings if such costs cannot be recovered. For additional information, including information on
certain environmental litigation, see MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS FUTURE EARNINGS
POTENTIAL Environmental Matters of Gulf Power in Item 7 and Note 3 to the financial statements
of Gulf Power under New Source Review Actions and Environmental Remediation in Item 8 of the
Form 10-K.
The EPA issued the final Clean Air Interstate Rule on March 10, 2005. The rule addresses
sulfur dioxide (SO2) and nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions that contribute to
nonattainment of the eight-hour ozone and fine particulate matter National Ambient Air Quality
Standards. Twenty-eight eastern states, including the States of Georgia, Florida, and Mississippi,
are subject to the fine particulate and/or the eight-hour ozone requirements set forth within the
rule. The rule may require additional reductions of NOx and/or SO2 to be
achieved by the installation of additional controls at Gulf Powers facilities or through the
purchase of allowances. The impact of this final rule on Gulf Power will, however, depend on the
outcome of legal challenges and development and implementation of applicable state regulations and
therefore cannot be determined at this time.
On March 15, 2005, the EPA announced the final Clean Air Mercury Rule, selecting a
cap-and-trade approach to be implemented in two phases, 2010 and 2018. The rule sets a permanent
cap on emissions at the 2018 level and provides for an emissions allowance trading market. The
impact of this final rule on Gulf Power will depend on the outcome of legal challenges and
development and implementation of applicable state regulations and therefore cannot be determined
at this time.
On June 15, 2005, the EPA issued final rules addressing Best Available Retrofit Technology
(BART) standards under the Regional Haze Program. States must develop regulations to implement the
federal regional haze requirements, including BART standards, by December 17, 2007. The impact of
the final BART rules on Gulf Power will depend on the outcome of any litigation over the final
rules and the development and implementation of the applicable state regulations and therefore
cannot be determined at this time.
68
GULF POWER COMPANY
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
FERC Matters
Market-Based Rate Authority
See MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL FERC and
Florida PSC Matters Market-Based Rate Authority of Gulf Power in Item 7 and Note 3 to the
financial statements of Gulf Power under Market-Based Rate Authority in Item 8 of the Form
10-K for information on the FERCs April 2004 order adopting a new interim analysis for
measuring generation market power and a proceeding initiated by the FERC in December 2004 to
assess Southern Companys generation dominance within its retail service territory. Gulf Power has authorization from the
FERC to sell power to non-affiliates at market-based prices. Gulf Power, through SCS as agent,
also has FERC authority to make short-term opportunity sales at market rates. Specific FERC
approval must be obtained with respect to a market-based contract with an affiliate. On
February 15, 2005, Southern Company submitted additional information related to generation
dominance in its retail service territory. On July 8, 2005, the FERC initiated a hearing before
an administrative law judge to review the generation market power issues. Any new market-based
rate transactions in Southern Companys retail service territory entered into after February 27,
2005 will be subject to refund to the level of the default cost-based rates, pending the outcome
of the proceeding. In the event that the FERCs default mitigation measures are ultimately
applied, Gulf Power may be required to charge cost-based rates for certain wholesale sales in
the Southern Company retail service territory, which may be lower than negotiated market-based
rates. The impact of such sales through June 30, 2005 is not material to Gulf Powers net
income. The final outcome of this matter will depend on the form in which the final methodology
for assessing generation market power and mitigation rules may be ultimately adopted and cannot
be determined at this time.
In addition, on May 5, 2005, the FERC issued an order expanding the generation market power
proceeding initiated in December 2004 to include an investigation of whether Southern Company
satisfies the other three parts of the FERCs market-based rate analysis: transmission market
power, barriers to entry, and affiliate abuse or reciprocal dealing. The FERC established a new
refund period related to this expanded investigation. Any and all new market-based rate
transactions involving any Southern Company subsidiary will be subject to refund to the extent the
FERC orders lower rates beginning July 19, 2005. The FERC also directed that this expanded
proceeding be held in abeyance pending the outcome of the proceeding on the IIC discussed below.
Southern Company and its subsidiaries believe that there is no meritorious basis for these
allegations and intend to vigorously defend themselves in the proceeding. However, the final
outcome of this matter, including any remedies to be applied in the event of an adverse ruling in
this proceeding, cannot now be determined.
Intercompany Interchange Contract
Also on May 5, 2005, the FERC initiated a new proceeding to examine (1) the provisions of the IIC
among Alabama Power, Georgia Power, Gulf Power, Mississippi Power, Savannah Electric, Southern
Power, and SCS, as agent, under the terms of which the power pool of Southern Company is operated,
and, in particular, the propriety of the continued inclusion of Southern Power as a party to the
IIC, (2) whether any parties to the IIC have violated the FERCs standards of conduct applicable to
utility companies that are transmission providers, and (3) whether Southern Companys code of
conduct defining Southern Power as a system company rather than a marketing affiliate is just
and reasonable. In 2000, in connection with the formation of Southern Power, the FERC authorized
Southern Powers inclusion in the IIC. The FERC also previously approved Southern Companys code
of conduct. The FERC order directs that the administrative law judge who presided over a previous
proceeding involving Southern Power, Georgia Power and Savannah Electric be assigned to preside
over the hearing in this proceeding and that the testimony and exhibits presented in that
proceeding be preserved to the extent appropriate. Effective July 19, 2005, revenues from
transactions under the IIC involving
69
GULF POWER COMPANY
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
any Southern Company subsidiaries will be subject to refund to the extent the FERC orders any
changes to the IIC.
Southern Company and its subsidiaries believe that there is no meritorious basis for these
allegations and intend to vigorously defend themselves in the proceeding. However, the final
outcome of this matter, including any remedies to be applied in the event of an adverse ruling in
this proceeding, cannot now be determined.
Generation Interconnection Agreements
See MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL FERC and Florida PSC
Matters Generation Interconnection Agreements of Gulf Power in Item 7 of the Form 10-K for
information on the FERCs Order 2003 related to standardization of generation interconnection
agreements and procedures. The FERC has indicated that Order 2003, which was effective January 20,
2004, is to be applied prospectively to interconnection agreements. Subsidiaries of Tenaska, Inc.,
as counterparties to previously executed interconnection agreements with any other Southern Company
subsidiary, have filed complaints at the FERC requesting that the FERC modify the agreements and
that the applicable Southern Company subsidiary refund amounts previously paid for interconnection
facilities, with interest. Gulf Power has also received similar requests from other entities
totaling $6.6 million. Gulf Power has opposed such relief, and the proceedings are still pending.
The impact of Order 2003 and its subsequent rehearings on Gulf Power and the final results of these
matters cannot be determined at this time.
Storm Damage Cost Recovery
Hurricane Ivan (Ivan) hit Gulf Powers service territory in September 2004. In March 2005, the
Florida PSC approved a Stipulation and Settlement (Stipulation) between Gulf Power, the Office
of Public Counsel for the State of Florida, and the Florida Industrial Power Users Group which
allows Gulf Power to recover the retail portion of $51.7 million, the projected reserve
deficiency, plus interest and revenue taxes from customers over a 24-month period beginning in
April 2005. In connection with the Stipulation, Gulf Power has agreed that it will not seek any
additional increase in its base rates and charges to become effective on or before March 1,
2007. See MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL FERC and Florida
PSC Matters Storm Damage Cost Recovery of Gulf Power in Item 7 and Note 3 to the financial
statements of Gulf Power under Retail Regulatory Matters in Item 8 of the Form 10-K and Note
(K) to the Condensed Financial Statements herein for additional information.
On July 10, 2005, Hurricane Dennis hit Gulf Powers service territory. Approximately 242,000,
or 60%, of Gulf Powers customers were without electrical service immediately after the hurricane
struck. More than 98% of those without power had service restored within six days. Based on
current projections, retail sales revenues lost as a result of power outages from Hurricane Dennis
are not expected to have a material impact on the net income of Gulf Power. Gulf Power maintains
an accumulated provision for property damage to cover the cost of damages from major storms and
other uninsured damages to its property. Due to the damages incurred in 2004 related to Ivan, the
accumulated reserve had a deficit balance of $42 million at June 30, 2005. The current preliminary
estimate of Hurricane Dennis restoration costs are approximately $60 million. The established
policy of the Florida PSC, as recently reaffirmed by its decisions following the 2004 hurricane
experience of Floridas investor owned electric utilities, provides for recovery of these costs
through the mechanism of the property insurance reserve and, where necessary, through a special
recovery surcharge. In 2005, the Florida legislature authorized securitized financing as an
additional mechanism available to the Florida PSC and electric utilities in Florida for addressing
the extraordinary costs associated with hurricanes. Based upon the additional costs
related to Hurricane Dennis, this option, along with other alternatives, is being evaluated. See
Note (K) to the Condensed Financial Statements herein for additional information.
70
GULF POWER COMPANY
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Other Matters
In July 2005, the
U.S. Congress passed the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (Energy
Act), which President Bush is expected to sign into law in early August 2005. Among
other things, the Energy Act includes various tax subsidies for electric utilities
and provisions repealing the PUHCA. The Energy Act also amends federal energy laws
and provides the FERC with new oversight responsibilities for the electric utility
industry. The implementation of the Energy Act requires proceedings at the state
level and the development of regulations by the FERC, as well as other federal
agencies. Gulf Power is still reviewing the legislation; however, its impacts
will depend on the promulgation and implementation of final rules and cannot be
determined at this time.
Gulf Power is subject to certain claims and legal actions arising in the ordinary course of
business. In addition, Gulf Powers business activities are subject to extensive governmental
regulation related to public health and the environment. Litigation over environmental issues and
claims of various types, including property damage, personal injury, and citizen enforcement of
environmental requirements, has increased generally throughout the United States. In particular,
personal injury claims for damages caused by alleged exposure to hazardous materials have become
more frequent. The ultimate outcome of such litigation against Gulf Power cannot be predicted at
this time; however, management does not anticipate that the liabilities, if any, arising from such
current proceedings would have a material adverse effect on Gulf Powers financial statements.
See the Notes to the Condensed Financial Statements herein for discussion of various
contingencies and other matters which may affect future earnings potential.
ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Application of Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Gulf Power prepares its financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States. Significant accounting policies are described in Note 1 to the
financial statements of Gulf Power in Item 8 of the Form 10-K. In the application of these
policies, certain estimates are made that may have a material impact on Gulf Powers results of
operations and related disclosures. Different assumptions and measurements could produce estimates
that are significantly different from those recorded in the financial statements. Also see
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS ACCOUNTING POLICIES Application of Critical Accounting
Policies and Estimates of Gulf Power in Item 7 of the Form 10-K for a complete discussion of Gulf
Powers critical accounting policies and estimates related to Electric Utility Regulation,
Contingent Obligations, and Unbilled Revenues.
New Accounting Standards
FASB Statement No. 123R, Share-Based Payments, was issued in December 2004. This statement
requires that compensation cost relating to share-based payment transactions be recognized in
financial statements. That cost will be measured based on the grant date fair value of the equity
instruments issued. In April 2005, the SEC amended the compliance dates for FASB Statement No.
123R. For Gulf Power, this statement is now effective beginning January 1, 2006. Although the
compensation expense calculation required under the revised statement differs slightly, the impacts
on Gulf Powers financial statements are expected to be similar to the pro forma disclosures
included in Note 1 to the financial statements of Gulf Power under Stock Options in Item 8 of the
Form 10-K and in Note (C) to the Condensed Financial Statements herein.
FASB Interpretation No. 47 (FIN 47), Accounting for Conditional Asset Retirement Obligations,
was issued in March 2005. This interpretation requires that asset retirement obligations be
recorded when a legal obligation exists even though the timing and/or the method of settlement are
conditional on a future event. For Gulf Power, FIN 47 is effective no later than December 31,
2005. Gulf Power is currently assessing the impact
71
GULF POWER COMPANY
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
of FIN 47 on its balance sheet; however, adoption is not currently expected to have a material
impact on Gulf Powers income statement.
In December 2004, the FASB issued Staff Position No. 109-1 (FSP 109-1), Application of FASB
Statement No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes, to the Tax Deduction on Qualified Production
Activities provided by the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004, which requires that the generation
deduction for utilities be accounted for as a special tax deduction rather than as a tax rate
reduction. Gulf Power adopted FSP 109-1 in the first quarter of 2005 with no material impact on
its financial statements.
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND LIQUIDITY
Gulf Powers financial condition remained stable at June 30, 2005. Net cash flow from operating
activities totaled $45.9 million for year-to-date 2005, compared to $98.1 million for the
corresponding period in 2004. The $52.2 million decrease in 2005 resulted primarily from payments
related to storm damage from Hurricane Ivan. Gross property additions to utility plant were $66
million for year-to-date 2005. Funds for Gulf Powers property additions were provided by
operating activities and other financing activities. See the Condensed Statements of Cash Flows
for additional information.
Capital Requirements and Contractual Obligations
See MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS FINANCIAL CONDITION AND LIQUIDITY - Capital
Requirements and Contractual Obligations of Gulf Power in Item 7 of the Form 10-K for a
description of Gulf Powers capital requirements for its construction program, lease obligations,
purchase commitments, and trust funding requirements. Approximately $112.1 million will be
required by June 30, 2006 for maturities of long-term debt.
Sources of Capital
Gulf Power plans to obtain the funds required for construction and other purposes from sources
similar to those used in the past including funds from operations and new security issuances. The
amount, type, and timing of any financings, if needed, will depend upon maintenance of adequate
earnings, regulatory approval, prevailing market conditions, and other factors. See
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS FINANCIAL CONDITION AND LIQUIDITY Sources of
Capital of Gulf Power in Item 7 of the Form 10-K for additional information.
At June 30, 2005, Gulf Powers current liabilities exceeded current assets because of the
continued use of short-term debt as a funding source to meet cash needs, which can fluctuate
significantly due to the seasonality of the business. To meet short-term cash needs and
contingencies, Gulf Power has various internal and external sources of liquidity. At June 30,
2005, Gulf Power had approximately $2.1 million of cash and cash equivalents and $55.5 million of
unused committed lines of credit with banks of which $10 million expire in 2005 and $45.5 million
expire in 2006. Gulf Power expects to renew its credit facilities, as needed, prior to expiration.
These credit arrangements provide liquidity support to Gulf Powers obligations with respect to
variable rate pollution control bonds and commercial paper. In addition, Gulf Power has
substantial cash flow from operating activities. Gulf Power may also meet short-term cash needs
through a Southern Company subsidiary organized to issue and sell commercial paper and extendible
commercial notes at the request and for the benefit of Gulf Power and other Southern Company
subsidiaries. At June 30, 2005, Gulf Power had $33.4 million of commercial paper and $10.3 million
of extendible commercial notes outstanding.
72
GULF POWER COMPANY
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Credit Rating Risk
Gulf Power does not have any credit arrangements that would require material changes in payment
schedules or terminations as a result of a credit rating downgrade. There are certain contracts
that could require collateral, but not accelerated payment, in the event of a credit rating change
to BBB- or Baa3 or below. Generally, collateral may be provided for by a Southern Company
guaranty, letter of credit, or cash. These contracts are primarily for the sale of electric
capacity. At June 30, 2005, the maximum potential collateral requirements at a BBB- or Baa3 rating
were approximately $5 million. The maximum potential collateral requirements at a rating below
BBB- or Baa3 were approximately $10 million. Gulf Power is also party to certain derivative
agreements that could require collateral and/or accelerated payment in the event of a credit rating
change to below investment grade. These agreements are primarily for natural gas price risk
management activities. At June 30, 2005, Gulf Power had no exposure under these agreements.
Market Price Risk
Gulf Powers market risk exposures relative to interest rate changes have not changed materially
compared with the December 31, 2004 reporting period. In addition, Gulf Power is not aware of any
facts or circumstances that would significantly affect such exposures in the near term.
Due to cost-based rate regulation, Gulf Power has limited exposure to market volatility in
interest rates, commodity fuel prices, and prices of electricity. To mitigate residual risks
relative to movements in electricity prices, Gulf Power enters into fixed-price contracts for
purchase of coal supplies and the purchase and sale of electricity through the wholesale
electricity market. Gulf Power has received approval from the Florida PSC to recover prudently
incurred costs related to its fuel hedging program through the fuel cost recovery mechanism. The
fair value of derivative energy contracts at June 30, 2005 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second Quarter |
|
|
|
|
2005 |
|
Year-to-Date |
|
|
Changes |
|
Changes |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
(in thousands) |
Contracts beginning of period |
|
$ |
11,916 |
|
|
$ |
317 |
|
Contracts realized or settled |
|
|
(4,539 |
) |
|
|
(3,104 |
) |
New contracts at inception |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in valuation techniques |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current period changes (a) |
|
|
(724 |
) |
|
|
9,440 |
|
|
Contracts at June 30, 2005 |
|
$ |
6,653 |
|
|
$ |
6,653 |
|
|
(a) |
|
Current period changes also include the changes in fair value of new contracts
entered into during the period. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Source of June 30, 2005 |
|
|
Valuation Prices |
|
|
Total |
|
Maturity |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
Year 1 |
|
1-3 Years |
|
|
(in thousands) |
Actively quoted |
|
$ |
6,663 |
|
|
$ |
4,284 |
|
|
$ |
2,379 |
|
External sources |
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Models and other methods |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contracts at June 30, 2005 |
|
$ |
6,653 |
|
|
$ |
4,274 |
|
|
$ |
2,379 |
|
|
73
GULF POWER COMPANY
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
See MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS FINANCIAL CONDITION AND LIQUIDITY Market Price
Risk of Gulf Power in Item 7 and Notes 1 and 6 to the financial statements of Gulf Power under
Financial Instruments in Item 8 of the Form 10-K and Note (F) to the Condensed Financial
Statements herein for further information.
Financing Activities
Gulf Power did not issue or redeem any long-term securities in the first and second quarters of
2005. In addition to any financings that may be necessary to meet capital requirements,
contractual obligations, and storm recovery, Gulf Power plans to continue, when economically
feasible, a program to retire higher-cost securities and replace these obligations with lower-cost
capital if market conditions permit.
74
MISSISSIPPI POWER COMPANY
75
MISSISSIPPI POWER COMPANY
CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF INCOME (UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months |
|
|
For the Six Months |
|
|
|
Ended June 30, |
|
|
Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Operating Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retail revenues |
|
$ |
166,597 |
|
|
$ |
151,861 |
|
|
$ |
298,391 |
|
|
$ |
280,416 |
|
Sales for resale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-affiliates |
|
|
67,726 |
|
|
|
68,935 |
|
|
|
127,312 |
|
|
|
134,735 |
|
Affiliates |
|
|
9,988 |
|
|
|
8,558 |
|
|
|
28,920 |
|
|
|
20,367 |
|
Other revenues |
|
|
4,265 |
|
|
|
3,431 |
|
|
|
9,169 |
|
|
|
6,995 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating revenues |
|
$ |
248,576 |
|
|
|
232,785 |
|
|
|
463,792 |
|
|
|
442,513 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fuel |
|
|
90,639 |
|
|
|
76,343 |
|
|
|
181,678 |
|
|
|
152,890 |
|
Purchased power |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-affiliates |
|
|
5,210 |
|
|
|
13,093 |
|
|
|
10,629 |
|
|
|
20,048 |
|
Affiliates |
|
|
24,919 |
|
|
|
22,837 |
|
|
|
34,523 |
|
|
|
40,153 |
|
Other operations |
|
|
39,723 |
|
|
|
39,154 |
|
|
|
79,234 |
|
|
|
74,110 |
|
Maintenance |
|
|
21,683 |
|
|
|
18,144 |
|
|
|
37,221 |
|
|
|
33,216 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
8,195 |
|
|
|
5,874 |
|
|
|
16,252 |
|
|
|
20,017 |
|
Taxes other than income taxes |
|
|
15,146 |
|
|
|
14,050 |
|
|
|
29,292 |
|
|
|
27,189 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
205,515 |
|
|
|
189,495 |
|
|
|
388,829 |
|
|
|
367,623 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Income |
|
|
43,061 |
|
|
|
43,290 |
|
|
|
74,963 |
|
|
|
74,890 |
|
Other Income and (Expense): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
66 |
|
|
|
162 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(597 |
) |
|
|
(3,048 |
) |
|
|
(4,123 |
) |
|
|
(5,851 |
) |
Interest expense to affiliate trusts |
|
|
(650 |
) |
|
|
(649 |
) |
|
|
(1,299 |
) |
|
|
(649 |
) |
Distributions on mandatorily redeemable preferred securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(630 |
) |
Other income (expense), net |
|
|
215 |
|
|
|
(231 |
) |
|
|
646 |
|
|
|
221 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income and (expense) |
|
|
(1,001 |
) |
|
|
(3,885 |
) |
|
|
(4,710 |
) |
|
|
(6,747 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings Before Income Taxes |
|
|
42,060 |
|
|
|
39,405 |
|
|
|
70,253 |
|
|
|
68,143 |
|
Income taxes |
|
|
15,995 |
|
|
|
15,051 |
|
|
|
26,808 |
|
|
|
25,967 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income |
|
|
26,065 |
|
|
|
24,354 |
|
|
|
43,445 |
|
|
|
42,176 |
|
Dividends on Preferred Stock |
|
|
433 |
|
|
|
2,463 |
|
|
|
866 |
|
|
|
2,966 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income After Dividends on Preferred Stock |
|
$ |
25,632 |
|
|
$ |
21,891 |
|
|
$ |
42,579 |
|
|
$ |
39,210 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months |
|
|
For the Six Months |
|
|
|
Ended June 30, |
|
|
Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Net Income After Dividends on Preferred Stock |
|
$ |
25,632 |
|
|
$ |
21,891 |
|
|
$ |
42,579 |
|
|
$ |
39,210 |
|
Other comprehensive income (loss): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in fair value of marketable securities, net of tax
of $49 and $49, respectively |
|
|
|
|
|
|
80 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80 |
|
Changes in fair value of qualifying hedges,
net of tax of $47, $(926), $(125) and $(1,400),
respectively |
|
|
74 |
|
|
|
(1,495 |
) |
|
|
(203 |
) |
|
|
(2,260 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME |
|
$ |
25,706 |
|
|
$ |
20,476 |
|
|
$ |
42,376 |
|
|
$ |
37,030 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes as they relate to Mississippi Power are an integral part of these condensed financial statements.
76
MISSISSIPPI POWER COMPANY
CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Six Months |
|
|
|
Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Operating Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
43,445 |
|
|
$ |
42,176 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income
to net cash provided from operating activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
31,097 |
|
|
|
30,481 |
|
Deferred income taxes and investment tax credits, net |
|
|
27,486 |
|
|
|
19,142 |
|
Plant Daniel capacity |
|
|
(12,563 |
) |
|
|
(8,254 |
) |
Pension, postretirement, and other employee benefits |
|
|
1,259 |
|
|
|
447 |
|
Tax benefit of stock options |
|
|
2,676 |
|
|
|
474 |
|
Other, net |
|
|
(3,034 |
) |
|
|
(1,324 |
) |
Changes in certain current assets and liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables, net |
|
|
(16,991 |
) |
|
|
(18,606 |
) |
Fossil fuel stock |
|
|
(15,097 |
) |
|
|
(1,567 |
) |
Materials and supplies |
|
|
2,491 |
|
|
|
(864 |
) |
Other current assets |
|
|
1,683 |
|
|
|
(3,157 |
) |
Accounts payable |
|
|
(10,540 |
) |
|
|
(18,507 |
) |
Accrued taxes |
|
|
(14,855 |
) |
|
|
(14,649 |
) |
Accrued compensation |
|
|
(11,305 |
) |
|
|
(9,546 |
) |
Over recovered regulatory clause revenues |
|
|
(1,851 |
) |
|
|
(16,914 |
) |
Other current liabilities |
|
|
551 |
|
|
|
1,217 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided from operating activities |
|
|
24,452 |
|
|
|
549 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross property additions |
|
|
(32,385 |
) |
|
|
(32,023 |
) |
Cost of removal net of salvage |
|
|
(1,366 |
) |
|
|
(3,606 |
) |
Other |
|
|
(1,167 |
) |
|
|
(1,547 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used for investing activities |
|
|
(34,918 |
) |
|
|
(37,176 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in notes payable, net |
|
|
37,887 |
|
|
|
44,830 |
|
Proceeds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior notes |
|
|
30,000 |
|
|
|
40,000 |
|
Preferred stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,000 |
|
Redemptions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First mortgage bonds |
|
|
(30,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Senior notes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(80,000 |
) |
Preferred stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(28,388 |
) |
Payment of preferred stock dividends |
|
|
(866 |
) |
|
|
(962 |
) |
Payment of common stock dividends |
|
|
(31,000 |
) |
|
|
(33,100 |
) |
Other |
|
|
(2,482 |
) |
|
|
(931 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided from (used for) financing activities |
|
|
3,539 |
|
|
|
(28,551 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Change in Cash and Cash Equivalents |
|
|
(6,927 |
) |
|
|
(65,178 |
) |
Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Period |
|
|
6,945 |
|
|
|
69,120 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Period |
|
$ |
18 |
|
|
$ |
3,942 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental Cash Flow Information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid during the period for |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest |
|
$ |
6,783 |
|
|
$ |
5,836 |
|
Income taxes (net of refunds) |
|
$ |
(11,811 |
) |
|
$ |
1,615 |
|
The accompanying notes as they relate to Mississippi Power are an integral part of these condensed financial statements.
77
MISSISSIPPI POWER COMPANY
CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS (UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At June 30, |
|
|
At December 31, |
|
Assets |
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Current Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
18 |
|
|
$ |
6,945 |
|
Receivables |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer accounts receivable |
|
|
37,614 |
|
|
|
32,978 |
|
Unbilled revenues |
|
|
26,754 |
|
|
|
20,803 |
|
Under recovered regulatory clause revenues |
|
|
42,626 |
|
|
|
32,499 |
|
Other accounts and notes receivable |
|
|
3,505 |
|
|
|
8,881 |
|
Affiliated companies |
|
|
17,190 |
|
|
|
15,769 |
|
Accumulated provision for uncollectible accounts |
|
|
(542 |
) |
|
|
(774 |
) |
Fossil fuel stock, at average cost |
|
|
34,801 |
|
|
|
19,704 |
|
Vacation pay |
|
|
6,125 |
|
|
|
6,125 |
|
Materials and supplies, at average cost |
|
|
24,947 |
|
|
|
27,438 |
|
Assets from risk management activities |
|
|
8,789 |
|
|
|
4,471 |
|
Prepaid income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,814 |
|
Prepaid expenses |
|
|
3,953 |
|
|
|
3,423 |
|
Other |
|
|
1,472 |
|
|
|
3,193 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
$ |
207,252 |
|
|
$ |
187,269 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, Plant, and Equipment: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In service |
|
|
1,900,834 |
|
|
|
1,882,542 |
|
Less accumulated provision for depreciation |
|
|
715,146 |
|
|
|
697,862 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,185,688 |
|
|
|
1,184,680 |
|
Construction work in progress |
|
|
32,013 |
|
|
|
27,961 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total property, plant, and equipment |
|
|
1,217,701 |
|
|
|
1,212,641 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Property and Investments |
|
|
6,461 |
|
|
|
6,402 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred Charges and Other Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred charges related to income taxes |
|
|
10,326 |
|
|
|
10,668 |
|
Prepaid pension costs |
|
|
17,612 |
|
|
|
19,158 |
|
Unamortized debt issuance expense |
|
|
7,028 |
|
|
|
6,955 |
|
Unamortized loss on reacquired debt |
|
|
11,369 |
|
|
|
9,437 |
|
Prepaid rent |
|
|
11,932 |
|
|
|
12,874 |
|
Other |
|
|
20,941 |
|
|
|
13,709 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred charges and other assets |
|
|
79,208 |
|
|
|
72,801 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets |
|
$ |
1,510,622 |
|
|
$ |
1,479,113 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes as they relate to Mississippi Power are an integral part of these condensed financial statements.
78
MISSISSIPPI POWER COMPANY
CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS (UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At June 30, |
|
|
At December 31, |
|
Liabilities and Stockholder's Equity |
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Current Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes payable |
|
$ |
37,887 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Affiliated |
|
|
24,372 |
|
|
|
19,568 |
|
Other |
|
|
37,930 |
|
|
|
52,688 |
|
Customer deposits |
|
|
8,467 |
|
|
|
9,053 |
|
Accrued taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes |
|
|
3,979 |
|
|
|
396 |
|
Other |
|
|
25,800 |
|
|
|
44,285 |
|
Accrued interest |
|
|
1,820 |
|
|
|
1,731 |
|
Accrued vacation pay |
|
|
6,125 |
|
|
|
6,125 |
|
Accrued compensation |
|
|
12,608 |
|
|
|
23,913 |
|
Regulatory clauses over recovery |
|
|
3,505 |
|
|
|
5,356 |
|
Plant Daniel capacity |
|
|
19,067 |
|
|
|
25,125 |
|
Other regulatory liabilities current |
|
|
16,901 |
|
|
|
9,841 |
|
Other |
|
|
7,461 |
|
|
|
11,101 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
205,922 |
|
|
|
209,182 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term Debt |
|
|
242,545 |
|
|
|
242,498 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term Debt Payable to Affiliated Trusts |
|
|
36,082 |
|
|
|
36,082 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred Credits and Other Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated deferred income taxes |
|
|
190,501 |
|
|
|
167,345 |
|
Deferred credits related to income taxes |
|
|
20,281 |
|
|
|
20,261 |
|
Accumulated deferred investment tax credits |
|
|
18,060 |
|
|
|
18,654 |
|
Employee benefit obligations |
|
|
56,987 |
|
|
|
57,275 |
|
Plant Daniel lease guarantee obligation, at fair value |
|
|
10,048 |
|
|
|
10,990 |
|
Plant Daniel capacity |
|
|
12,163 |
|
|
|
18,667 |
|
Other cost of removal obligations |
|
|
79,167 |
|
|
|
76,228 |
|
Miscellaneous regulatory liabilities |
|
|
7,361 |
|
|
|
4,487 |
|
Other |
|
|
38,834 |
|
|
|
38,827 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred credits and other liabilities |
|
|
433,402 |
|
|
|
412,734 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities |
|
|
917,951 |
|
|
|
900,496 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred Stock |
|
|
32,780 |
|
|
|
32,780 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stockholders Equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, without par value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Authorized 1,130,000 shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding 1,121,000 shares |
|
|
37,691 |
|
|
|
37,691 |
|
Paid-in capital |
|
|
298,515 |
|
|
|
295,837 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
227,472 |
|
|
|
215,893 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
|
(3,787 |
) |
|
|
(3,584 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total common stockholders equity |
|
|
559,891 |
|
|
|
545,837 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities and Stockholders Equity |
|
$ |
1,510,622 |
|
|
$ |
1,479,113 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes as they relate to Mississippi Power are an integral part of these condensed financial statements.
79
MISSISSIPPI POWER COMPANY
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
SECOND QUARTER 2005 vs. SECOND QUARTER 2004
AND
YEAR-TO-DATE 2005 vs. YEAR-TO-DATE 2004
OVERVIEW
Mississippi Power operates as a vertically integrated utility providing electricity to retail
customers within its traditional service area located within the State of Mississippi and to
wholesale customers in the Southeast. Many factors affect the opportunities, challenges, and risks
of Mississippi Powers business of selling electricity. These factors include the ability to
maintain a stable regulatory environment, to achieve energy sales growth while containing costs,
and to recover costs related to growing demand and increasingly stringent environmental standards.
Mississippi Power continues to focus on several key performance indicators. In recognition
that Mississippi Powers long-term financial success is dependent upon how well it satisfies its
customers needs, Mississippi Powers retail base rate mechanism, PEP, includes performance
indicators that directly tie customer service indicators to Mississippi Powers allowed return. In
addition to the PEP performance indicators, Mississippi Power focuses on other performance
measures, including broader measures of customer satisfaction, return on equity, and peak season
equivalent forced outage rate. For additional information on these indicators, see MANAGEMENTS
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OVERVIEW Key Performance Indicators of Mississippi Power in Item 7 of
the Form 10-K.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Earnings
Mississippi Powers net income after dividends on preferred stock for the second quarter and
year-to-date 2005 was $25.6 million and $42.6 million, respectively, compared to $21.9 million and
$39.2 million, respectively, for the corresponding periods of 2004. Earnings in the second quarter
and year-to-date 2005 increased by $3.7 million, or 17.1%, and $3.4 million, or 8.6%, respectively,
compared to the same periods of 2004 as a result of higher operating revenues, lower amortization
expenses associated with the regulatory liability for Plant Daniel capacity, and lower interest
expense and dividends, partially offset by increased operation and maintenance expenses. See Note
3 to the financial statements of Mississippi Power under Retail Regulatory Matters in Item 8 of
the Form 10-K for additional information on the Plant Daniel capacity regulatory liability.
80
MISSISSIPPI
POWER COMPANY
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Significant income statement items appropriate for discussion include the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (Decrease) |
|
|
|
Second Quarter |
|
|
Year-To-Date |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
% |
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
% |
|
Retail revenues |
|
$ |
14,736 |
|
|
|
9.7 |
|
|
$ |
17,975 |
|
|
|
6.4 |
|
Sales for resale non-affiliates |
|
|
(1,209 |
) |
|
|
(1.8 |
) |
|
|
(7,423 |
) |
|
|
(5.5 |
) |
Sales for resale affiliates |
|
|
1,430 |
|
|
|
16.7 |
|
|
|
8,553 |
|
|
|
42.0 |
|
Fuel expense |
|
|
14,296 |
|
|
|
18.7 |
|
|
|
28,788 |
|
|
|
18.8 |
|
Purchased power expense non-affiliates |
|
|
(7,883 |
) |
|
|
(60.2 |
) |
|
|
(9,419 |
) |
|
|
(47.0 |
) |
Purchased power expense affiliates |
|
|
2,082 |
|
|
|
9.1 |
|
|
|
(5,630 |
) |
|
|
(14.0 |
) |
Other operations expense |
|
|
569 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
5,124 |
|
|
|
6.9 |
|
Maintenance expense |
|
|
3,539 |
|
|
|
19.5 |
|
|
|
4,005 |
|
|
|
12.1 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
2,321 |
|
|
|
39.5 |
|
|
|
(3,765 |
) |
|
|
(18.8 |
) |
Taxes other than income taxes |
|
|
1,096 |
|
|
|
7.8 |
|
|
|
2,103 |
|
|
|
7.7 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(2,451 |
) |
|
|
(80.4 |
) |
|
|
(1,728 |
) |
|
|
(29.5 |
) |
Dividends on preferred stock |
|
|
(2,030 |
) |
|
|
(82.4 |
) |
|
|
(2,100 |
) |
|
|
(70.8 |
) |
Retail revenues. The chart below reflects the primary drivers of the 9.7% increase and 6.4%
increase in retail revenues in the second quarter and year-to-date 2005, respectively, compared to
the same periods in the prior year. Retail revenues for the second quarter and year-to-date 2005
increased when compared to the same periods in 2004 primarily as a result of increases in fuel
revenues. During the second quarter 2005, kilowatt-hour energy sales to residential, commercial,
and industrial customers were up 3.6%, up 4.0%, and down 0.6%, respectively, when compared to the
same period in 2004. Year-to-date 2005 kilowatt-hour energy sales to residential, commercial, and
industrial customers were down 0.9%, up 1.4%, and up 0.4%, respectively, when compared to the
corresponding period in 2004. The increase in kilowatt-hour energy sales for the residential
sector in the second quarter 2005 was due to customer growth and warmer June weather. The
year-to-date 2005 decrease in kilowatt-hour energy sales for the residential sector was due to
milder winter weather in the first quarter 2005. Commercial kilowatt-hour energy sales were up in
the second quarter and year-to-date 2005 primarily as a result of growth in the number of
customers. The decrease in kilowatt-hour energy sales for the industrial sector in the second
quarter 2005 was due to an extended maintenance outage at a major industrial customers plant. The
year-to-date 2005 increase in kilowatt-hour energy sales for the industrial sector was due to
growth in the number of customers.
Details of retail revenues are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second Quarter |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year-to-Date |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
% change |
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
% change |
|
Retail prior year |
|
$ |
151,861 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
280,416 |
|
|
|
|
|
Change in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Base rates |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales growth |
|
|
4,749 |
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
|
5,653 |
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
Weather |
|
|
(1,746 |
) |
|
|
(1.1 |
) |
|
|
(3,514 |
) |
|
|
(1.3 |
) |
Fuel cost recovery |
|
|
11,198 |
|
|
|
7.4 |
|
|
|
14,360 |
|
|
|
5.1 |
|
Other cost recovery |
|
|
535 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
1,476 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
Retail current year |
|
$ |
166,597 |
|
|
|
9.7 |
% |
|
$ |
298,391 |
|
|
|
6.4 |
% |
|
81
MISSISSIPPI POWER COMPANY
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Sales
for resale non-affiliates and Purchased power expense
non-affiliates. The decreases
in sales for resale to non-affiliates and purchased power expense from non-affiliates in the second
quarter and year-to-date 2005 as compared to the same periods in 2004 are primarily the result of
fewer opportunities in the wholesale market due to milder weather and higher fuel costs when
compared to the same period last year.
Sales
for resale affiliates and Purchased power expense
affiliates. Revenues from sales
for resale to affiliates, as well as purchases of energy from affiliates, will vary depending on
demand and the availability and cost of generating resources at each company within the Southern
Company system. These affiliate sales and purchases are made in accordance with the IIC, as
approved by the FERC. These transactions do not have a significant impact on earnings since the
energy is generally sold at marginal cost and energy purchases are generally offset by energy
revenues through Mississippi Powers retail and wholesale fuel cost recovery clauses. The second
quarter and year-to-date 2005 increases in sales for resale to affiliates are a result of
Mississippi Powers more economical generating cost when compared to its affiliates. The second
quarter 2005 increase in purchased power from affiliates is associated with more economical
generating costs for affiliates as compared to non-affiliates. The year-to-date 2005 decrease in
purchased power from affiliates is due to lower wholesale opportunity sales due to the milder
weather and higher fuel costs when compared to the same period last year.
Fuel expense. The increases in fuel expense for the second quarter and year-to-date 2005 as
compared to the same periods in 2004 are a result of a 31.6% increase in the price of coal, a 5.1%
increase in the price of gas, and a 9.4% increase in coal generation. Since energy expenses are
generally offset by energy revenues through Mississippi Powers retail and wholesale fuel cost
recovery clauses, these expenses do not have a significant impact on earnings.
Other operations expense. The increases in other operations expense for the second quarter
and year-to-date 2005 as compared to the same periods in 2004 result from increases in expenses
associated with the Plant Daniel combined cycle lease of $0.2 million and $0.8 million,
respectively. Also impacting other operations expense were increases of $0.9 million and $1.8
million, respectively, in employee medical benefit costs and $0.5 million and $1.2 million,
respectively, in pension and post-retirement benefit costs.
Maintenance expense. The second quarter and year-to-date 2005 increases in maintenance
expense when compared to the same periods in 2004 are primarily the result of scheduled maintenance
at Plants Watson, Daniel, and Greene County and scheduled maintenance on overhead lines.
Depreciation and amortization. The second quarter 2005 increase in depreciation and
amortization expense when compared to the same period in 2004 is primarily the result of lower
credit amortization related to the Plant Daniel capacity regulatory liability in 2005. An order
approved in May 2004 by the Mississippi PSC allowed Mississippi Power to credit expense in the
amount of $8.3 million to amortize the regulatory liability retroactive to January 1, 2004 in the
second quarter of 2004. The year-to-date 2005 decrease in depreciation and amortization expense
when compared to the same period in 2004 is primarily the result of the increase in the credit
amortization of the regulatory liability in 2005. The Mississippi PSCs final order of May 2004
established $25.1 million to be credited to earnings in 2005. See Note 3 to the financial
statements of Mississippi Power under Retail Regulatory Matters in Item 8 of the Form 10-K for
additional information.
Taxes other than income taxes. The increases in taxes other than income taxes for the second
quarter and year-to-date 2005 as compared to the same periods in 2004 are a result of higher
property taxes due to the increase in property investment. Since the retail portion is recoverable
through Mississippi Powers ad valorem tax adjustment clause, this increase does not have a
significant impact on earnings.
82
MISSISSIPPI
POWER COMPANY
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Interest expense. The decreases in interest expense for the second quarter and year-to-date
2005 as compared to the same periods in 2004 are due to the reversal in June 2005, as a result of
changes in the legal and regulatory environment, of a $2.5 million liability originally recorded
for the potential assessment of interest associated with a customer
advance.
Dividends on preferred stock. The decreases in dividends on preferred stock for the second
quarter and year-to-date 2005 as compared to the same periods in 2004 are a result of a one-time
loss in 2004 associated with the redemption of preferred stock.
FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL
The results of operations discussed above are not necessarily indicative of Mississippi Powers
future earnings potential. The level of Mississippi Powers future earnings depends on numerous
factors that affect the opportunities, challenges, and risks of Mississippi Powers business of
selling electricity. These factors include Mississippi Powers ability to maintain a stable
regulatory environment, to achieve energy sales growth while containing costs, and to recover costs
related to growing demand and increasingly stringent environmental standards. Future earnings in
the near term will depend, in part, upon growth in energy sales, which is subject to a number of
factors. These factors include weather, competition, new energy contracts with neighboring
utilities, energy conservation practiced by customers, the price of electricity, the price
elasticity of demand, and the rate of economic growth in Mississippi Powers service area. For
additional information relating to these issues, see BUSINESS The SOUTHERN System Risk
Factors in Item 1 and MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND
ANALYSIS FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL of
Mississippi Power in Item 7 of the Form 10-K.
Environmental Matters
Compliance costs related to the Clean Air Act and other environmental regulations could affect
earnings if such costs cannot be recovered. For additional information, including information on
certain environmental litigation, see MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS FUTURE EARNINGS
POTENTIAL Environmental Matters of Mississippi Power in Item 7 and Note 3 to the financial
statements of Mississippi Power in Item 8 of the Form 10-K.
The EPA issued the final Clean Air Interstate Rule on March 10, 2005. The rule addresses
sulfur dioxide (SO2) and nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions that contribute to
nonattainment of the eight-hour ozone and fine particulate matter National Ambient Air Quality
Standards. Twenty-eight eastern states, including the States of Alabama and Mississippi, are
subject to the fine particulate and/or the eight-hour ozone requirements set forth within the rule.
The rule may require additional reductions of NOx and/or SO2 to be achieved
by the installation of additional controls at Mississippi Powers facilities or through the
purchase of allowances. The impact of this final rule on Mississippi Power will, however, depend
on the outcome of legal challenges and development and implementation of applicable state
regulations and therefore cannot be determined at this time.
On March 15, 2005, the EPA announced the final Clean Air Mercury Rule, selecting a
cap-and-trade approach to be implemented in two phases, 2010 and 2018. The rule sets a permanent
cap on emissions at the 2018 level and provides for an emissions allowance trading market. The
impact of this final rule on Mississippi Power will depend on the outcome of legal challenges and
development and implementation of applicable state regulations and therefore cannot be determined
at this time.
On June 15, 2005, the EPA issued final rules addressing Best Available Retrofit Technology
(BART) standards under the Regional Haze Program. States must develop regulations to implement the
federal regional
83
MISSISSIPPI
POWER COMPANY
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
haze requirements, including BART standards, by December 17, 2007. The impact of the final BART
rules on Mississippi Power will depend on the outcome of any litigation over the final rules and
the development and implementation of the applicable state regulations and therefore cannot be
determined at this time.
FERC and Mississippi PSC Matters
Market-Based Rate Authority
See
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND
ANALYSIS FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL FERC and
Mississippi PSC Matters Market-Based Rate Authority of Mississippi Power in Item 7 and Note 3 to
the financial statements of Mississippi Power under Market-Based Rate Authority in Item 8 of the
Form 10-K for information on the FERCs April 2004 order adopting a new interim analysis for
measuring generation market power and a proceeding initiated by the FERC in December 2004 to assess
Southern Companys generation dominance within its retail service territory. Mississippi Power has
authorization from the FERC to sell power to non-affiliates at market-based prices. Mississippi
Power, through SCS as agent, also has FERC authority to make short-term opportunity sales at market
rates. Specific FERC approval must be obtained with respect to a market-based contract with an
affiliate. On February 15, 2005, Southern Company submitted additional information related to
generation dominance in its retail service territory. On July 8, 2005, the FERC initiated a
hearing before an administrative law judge to review the generation market power issues. Any new
market-based rate transactions in Southern Companys retail service territory entered into after
February 27, 2005 will be subject to refund to the level of the default cost-based rates, pending
the outcome of the proceeding. In the event that the FERCs default mitigation measures are
ultimately applied, Mississippi Power may be required to charge cost-based rates for certain
wholesale sales in the Southern Company retail service territory, which may be lower than
negotiated market-based rates. The impact of such sales through June 30, 2005 is not material to
Mississippi Powers net income. The final outcome of this matter will depend on the form in which
the final methodology for assessing generation market power and mitigation rules may be ultimately
adopted and cannot be determined at this time.
In addition, on May 5, 2005, the FERC issued an order expanding the generation market power
proceeding initiated in December 2004 to include an investigation of whether Southern Company
satisfies the other three parts of the FERCs market-based rate analysis: transmission market
power, barriers to entry, and affiliate abuse or reciprocal dealing. The FERC established a new
refund period related to this expanded investigation. Any and all new market-based rate
transactions involving any Southern Company subsidiary will be subject to refund to the extent the
FERC orders lower rates beginning July 19, 2005. The FERC also directed that this expanded
proceeding be held in abeyance pending the outcome of the proceeding on the IIC discussed below.
Southern Company and its subsidiaries believe that there is no meritorious basis for these
allegations and intend to vigorously defend themselves in the proceeding. However, the final
outcome of this matter, including any remedies to be applied in the event of an adverse ruling in
this proceeding, cannot now be determined.
Intercompany Interchange Contract
Also on May 5, 2005, the FERC initiated a new proceeding to examine (1) the provisions of the IIC
among Alabama Power, Georgia Power, Gulf Power, Mississippi Power, Savannah Electric, Southern
Power, and SCS, as agent, under the terms of which the power pool of Southern Company is operated,
and, in particular, the propriety of the continued inclusion of Southern Power as a party to the
IIC, (2) whether any parties to the IIC have violated the FERCs standards of conduct applicable to
utility companies that are transmission providers, and (3) whether Southern Companys code of
conduct defining Southern Power as a system company rather than a marketing affiliate is just
and reasonable. In 2000, in connection with the formation of Southern
84
MISSISSIPPI
POWER COMPANY
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Power, the FERC authorized Southern Powers inclusion in the IIC. The FERC also previously
approved Southern Companys code of conduct. The FERC order directs that the administrative law
judge who presided over a previous proceeding involving Southern Power, Georgia Power and Savannah
Electric be assigned to preside over the hearing in this proceeding and that the testimony and
exhibits presented in that proceeding be preserved to the extent appropriate. Effective July 19,
2005, revenues from transactions under the IIC involving any Southern Company subsidiaries will be
subject to refund to the extent the FERC orders any changes to the IIC.
Southern Company and its subsidiaries believe that there is no meritorious basis for these
allegations and intend to vigorously defend themselves in the proceeding. However, the final
outcome of this matter, including any remedies to be applied in the event of an adverse ruling in
this proceeding, cannot now be determined.
Environmental Compliance Overview Plan
See Note 3 to the financial statements of Mississippi Power under Environmental Compliance
Overview Plan in Item 8 of the Form 10-K for additional information on the ECO Plan. Mississippi
Powers ECO Plan annual filing for 2005 was approved by the Mississippi PSC at the conclusion of
the ECO Plan hearings on April 5, 2005. An order was issued on July 7, 2005, resulting in a slight
increase in rates effective May 2005. Compliance costs related to the Clean Air Act and other
environmental regulations could affect earnings if such costs cannot continue to be recovered.
Other Matters
In July 2005, the U.S. Congress passed the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (Energy Act), which President Bush is
expected to sign into law in early August 2005. Among other things, the Energy Act includes various tax subsidies for electric utilities and provisions repealing the PUHCA.
The Energy Act also amends federal energy laws and provides the FERC with new oversight responsibilities for the electric utility industry. The implementation of the Energy Act
requires proceedings at the state level and the development of regulations by the FERC, as well as other federal agencies. Mississippi Power is still reviewing the legislation; however, its impacts
will depend on the promulgation and implementation of final rules and cannot be determined at this time.
Mississippi Power is subject to certain claims and legal actions arising in the ordinary
course of business. In addition, Mississippi Powers business activities are subject to extensive
governmental regulation related to public health and the environment. Litigation over
environmental issues and claims of various types, including property damage, personal injury, and
citizen enforcement of environmental requirements, has increased generally throughout the United
States. In particular, personal injury claims for damages caused by alleged exposure to hazardous
materials have become more frequent. The ultimate outcome of such litigation against Mississippi
Power cannot be predicted at this time; however, management does not anticipate that the
liabilities, if any, arising from such current proceedings would have a material adverse effect on
Mississippi Powers financial statements.
See the Notes to the Condensed Financial Statements herein for discussion of various
contingencies and other matters which may affect future earnings potential.
ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Application of Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Mississippi Power prepares its financial statements in accordance with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States. Significant accounting policies are described in Note 1
to the financial statements of Mississippi Power in Item 8 of the Form 10-K. In the application of
these policies, certain estimates are made that may have a material impact on Mississippi Powers
results of operations and related disclosures. Different assumptions and measurements could
produce estimates that are significantly different from those recorded in
85
MISSISSIPPI
POWER COMPANY
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
the
financial statements. Also see MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Application of Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates of Mississippi Power in Item 7 of the
Form 10-K for a complete discussion of Mississippi Powers critical accounting policies and
estimates related to Electric Utility Regulation, Contingent Obligations, Unbilled Revenues, and
Plant Daniel Operating Lease.
New Accounting Standards
FASB Statement No. 123R, Share-Based Payments, was issued in December 2004. This statement
requires that compensation cost relating to share-based payment transactions be recognized in
financial statements. That cost will be measured based on the grant date fair value of the equity
instruments issued. In April 2005, the SEC amended the compliance dates for FASB Statement No.
123R. For Mississippi Power, this statement is now effective beginning January 1, 2006. Although
the compensation expense calculation required under the revised statement differs slightly, the
impacts on Mississippi Powers financial statements are expected to be similar to the pro forma
disclosures included in Note 1 to the financial statements of Mississippi Power under Stock
Options in Item 8 of the Form 10-K and Note (C) to the Condensed Financial Statements herein.
FASB Interpretation No. 47 (FIN 47), Accounting for Conditional Asset Retirement Obligations,
was issued in March 2005. This interpretation requires that asset retirement obligations be
recorded when a legal obligation exists even though the timing and/or the method of settlement are
conditional on a future event. For Mississippi Power, FIN 47 is effective no later than December
31, 2005. Mississippi Power is currently assessing the impact of FIN 47 on its balance sheet;
however, adoption is not currently expected to have a material impact on Mississippi Powers income
statement.
In December 2004, the FASB issued Staff Position No. 109-1 (FSP 109-1), Application of FASB
Statement No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes, to the Tax Deduction on Qualified Production
Activities provided by the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004, which requires that the generation
deduction for utilities be accounted for as a special tax deduction rather than as a tax rate
reduction. Mississippi Power adopted FSP 109-1 in the first quarter of 2005 with no material
impact on its financial statements.
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND LIQUIDITY
Overview
Mississippi Powers financial condition remained stable at June 30, 2005. Net cash flow
provided from operating activities totaled $24.5 million for year-to-date 2005, compared to net
cash flow provided from operating activities of $549 thousand for the same period in 2004. The
$23.9 million increase in 2005 resulted primarily from the collection of higher regulatory
clause rates and income tax refunds.
Capital Requirements and Contractual Obligations
See
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS FINANCIAL CONDITION AND LIQUIDITY Capital
Requirements and Contractual Obligations of Mississippi Power in Item 7 of the Form 10-K for a
description of Mississippi Powers capital requirements for its construction program, lease
obligations, purchase commitments, and trust funding requirements. Mississippi Power has no
maturities or redemptions of long-term debt required by June 30, 2006.
Sources of Capital
In addition to the financing activities described herein, Mississippi Power plans to obtain the
funds required for construction and other purposes from sources similar to those used in the past
including funds from operations
86
MISSISSIPPI
POWER COMPANY
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
and new security issuances. The amount, type, and timing of any financings, if needed, will depend
upon maintenance of adequate earnings, regulatory approval, prevailing market conditions, and other
factors. See MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND LIQUIDITY Sources
of Capital of Mississippi Power in Item 7 of the Form 10-K for additional information.
Mississippi Power continues to use short-term debt as a funding source to meet cash needs,
which can fluctuate significantly due to the seasonality of the business. To meet short-term cash
needs and contingencies, Mississippi Power had at June 30, 2005 approximately $18 thousand of cash
and cash equivalents and $100.5 million of unused committed credit arrangements with banks; $50.5
million of which expire in 2005, and $50 million of which expire in 2006. Approximately $38
million of these credit arrangements contain provisions allowing two-year term loans executable at
expiration. Mississippi Power expects to renew its credit facilities, as needed, prior to
expiration. The credit arrangements provide liquidity support to Mississippi Powers obligations
with respect to variable rate pollution control bonds and commercial paper. Mississippi Power may
also meet short-term cash needs through a Southern Company subsidiary organized to issue and sell
commercial paper and extendible commercial notes at the request and for the benefit of Mississippi
Power and other Southern Company subsidiaries. At June 30, 2005, Mississippi Power had $37.9
million in outstanding notes payable. Management believes that the need for working capital can be
adequately met by utilizing commercial paper programs and lines of credit without maintaining large
cash balances.
Off-Balance Sheet Financing Arrangements
See
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND LIQUIDITY Off-Balance Sheet
Financing Arrangements in Item 7 and Note 7 to the financial statements of Mississippi Power under
Operating Leases in Item 8 of the Form 10-K for information related to Mississippi Powers lease
of a combined cycle generating facility at Plant Daniel.
Credit Rating Risk
Mississippi Power does not have any credit arrangements that would require material changes in
payment schedules or terminations as a result of a credit rating downgrade. Mississippi Power is
party to certain derivative agreements that could require collateral and/or accelerated payment in
the event of a credit rating change to below investment grade. These agreements are primarily for
natural gas price risk management activities. At June 30, 2005, Mississippi Power had no exposure
under these agreements.
Market Price Risk
Mississippi Powers market risk exposures relative to interest rate changes have not changed
materially compared with the December 31, 2004 reporting period. In addition, Mississippi Power is
not aware of any facts or circumstances that would significantly affect such exposures in the near
term.
Due to cost-based rate regulation, Mississippi Power has limited exposure to market volatility
in interest rates, commodity fuel prices, and prices of electricity. To mitigate residual risks
relative to movements in electricity prices, Mississippi Power enters into fixed-price contracts
for the purchase and sale of electricity through the wholesale electricity market. Mississippi
Power has also implemented retail fuel hedging programs at the instruction of the Mississippi PSC
and wholesale fuel hedging programs under agreements with wholesale customers.
87
MISSISSIPPI
POWER COMPANY
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The fair value of derivative, fuel, and energy contracts at June 30, 2005 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second Quarter |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
Year-to-Date |
|
|
|
Changes |
|
|
Changes |
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Contracts beginning of period |
|
$ |
23,180 |
|
|
$ |
889 |
|
Contracts realized or settled |
|
|
(8,149 |
) |
|
|
(6,144 |
) |
New contracts at inception |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in valuation techniques |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current period changes (a) |
|
|
(1,048 |
) |
|
|
19,238 |
|
|
Contracts at June 30, 2005 |
|
$ |
13,983 |
|
|
$ |
13,983 |
|
|
(a) |
|
Current period changes also include the changes in fair value of new contracts
entered into during the period. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Source of June 30, 2005 |
|
|
|
Valuation Prices |
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
Maturity |
|
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Year 1 |
|
|
1-3 Years |
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Actively quoted |
|
$ |
14,718 |
|
|
$ |
7,732 |
|
|
$ |
6,986 |
|
External sources |
|
|
(735 |
) |
|
|
(735 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Models and other methods |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contracts at June 30, 2005 |
|
$ |
13,983 |
|
|
$ |
6,997 |
|
|
$ |
6,986 |
|
|
For
additional information, see MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
LIQUIDITY Market Price Risk of Mississippi Power in Item 7 and Notes 1 and 6 to the financial
statements of Mississippi Power under Financial Instruments in Item 8 of the Form 10-K and Note
(F) to the Condensed Financial Statements herein.
Financing Activities
Mississippi Power did not issue or redeem any long-term securities during the first quarter of
2005. However, in June 2005, Mississippi Power issued $30 million of Series G 5.40% Senior Notes
due July 1, 2035. The proceeds from this sale were used for the legal defeasance of $30 million
principal amount of its First Mortgage Bonds, 6 7/8% Series due December 1, 2025 and the related
first mortgage bond indenture. An irrevocable trust agreement was executed by Mississippi Power
and the trustee for the bondholders under which the bonds will be redeemed in December 2005. As a
result of the defeasance, there are no longer any first mortgage bond liens on Mississippi Powers
property. Mississippi Power has extinguished the liability related to the first mortgage bonds
since Mississippi Power has been legally released from being the primary obligor by the
bondholders. See Note (L) to the Condensed Financial Statements herein for additional information.
In addition to any financings that may be necessary to meet capital requirements and
contractual obligations, Mississippi Power plans to continue, when economically feasible, a program
to retire higher-cost securities and replace these obligations with lower-cost capital if market
conditions permit.
88
SAVANNAH ELECTRIC
AND
POWER COMPANY
89
SAVANNAH ELECTRIC AND POWER COMPANY
CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF INCOME (UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months |
|
|
For the Six Months |
|
|
|
Ended June 30, |
|
|
Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As Restated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
As Restated |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
(Note N) |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
(Note N) |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Operating Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retail revenues |
|
$ |
91,143 |
|
|
$ |
87,516 |
|
|
$ |
176,147 |
|
|
$ |
155,025 |
|
Sales for resale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-affiliates |
|
|
1,355 |
|
|
|
1,294 |
|
|
|
1,813 |
|
|
|
2,704 |
|
Affiliates |
|
|
1,254 |
|
|
|
1,653 |
|
|
|
3,315 |
|
|
|
4,090 |
|
Other revenues |
|
|
2,836 |
|
|
|
686 |
|
|
|
3,901 |
|
|
|
1,651 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating revenues |
|
|
96,588 |
|
|
|
91,149 |
|
|
|
185,176 |
|
|
|
163,470 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fuel |
|
|
18,901 |
|
|
|
14,123 |
|
|
|
32,023 |
|
|
|
24,607 |
|
Purchased power |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-affiliates |
|
|
2,345 |
|
|
|
4,387 |
|
|
|
4,231 |
|
|
|
6,729 |
|
Affiliates |
|
|
28,783 |
|
|
|
27,145 |
|
|
|
65,062 |
|
|
|
49,275 |
|
Other operations |
|
|
15,612 |
|
|
|
15,577 |
|
|
|
29,936 |
|
|
|
29,678 |
|
Maintenance |
|
|
6,190 |
|
|
|
6,905 |
|
|
|
16,076 |
|
|
|
13,336 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
5,528 |
|
|
|
5,246 |
|
|
|
10,876 |
|
|
|
10,450 |
|
Taxes other than income taxes |
|
|
3,898 |
|
|
|
3,795 |
|
|
|
7,697 |
|
|
|
7,392 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
81,257 |
|
|
|
77,178 |
|
|
|
165,901 |
|
|
|
141,467 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Income |
|
|
15,331 |
|
|
|
13,971 |
|
|
|
19,275 |
|
|
|
22,003 |
|
Other Income and (Expense): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
98 |
|
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized |
|
|
(3,606 |
) |
|
|
(2,989 |
) |
|
|
(6,829 |
) |
|
|
(6,132 |
) |
Distributions on mandatorily redeemable preferred securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(109 |
) |
Other income (expense), net |
|
|
1,047 |
|
|
|
(101 |
) |
|
|
2,153 |
|
|
|
(519 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income and (expense) |
|
|
(2,541 |
) |
|
|
(3,063 |
) |
|
|
(4,641 |
) |
|
|
(6,662 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings Before Income Taxes |
|
|
12,790 |
|
|
|
10,908 |
|
|
|
14,634 |
|
|
|
15,341 |
|
Income taxes |
|
|
4,387 |
|
|
|
3,974 |
|
|
|
4,536 |
|
|
|
5,574 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income |
|
|
8,403 |
|
|
|
6,934 |
|
|
|
10,098 |
|
|
|
9,767 |
|
Dividends on Preferred Stock |
|
|
675 |
|
|
|
150 |
|
|
|
1,350 |
|
|
|
150 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income After Dividends on Preferred Stock |
|
$ |
7,728 |
|
|
$ |
6,784 |
|
|
$ |
8,748 |
|
|
$ |
9,617 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months |
|
|
For the Six Months |
|
|
|
Ended June 30, |
|
|
Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As Restated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
As Restated |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
(Note N) |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
(Note N) |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Net Income After Dividends on Preferred Stock |
|
$ |
7,728 |
|
|
$ |
6,784 |
|
|
$ |
8,748 |
|
|
$ |
9,617 |
|
Other comprehensive income (loss): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in fair value of qualifying hedges,
net of tax of $(667), $10, $(217) and
$(10), respectively |
|
|
(1,058 |
) |
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
(345 |
) |
|
|
(15 |
) |
Reclassification adjustment for amounts
included in net income, net of tax of $2,
$15, $5 and $30, respectively |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME |
|
$ |
6,675 |
|
|
$ |
6,825 |
|
|
$ |
8,412 |
|
|
$ |
9,649 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes as they relate to Savannah Electric are an integral part of these condensed financial statements.
90
SAVANNAH ELECTRIC AND POWER COMPANY
CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Six Months |
|
|
|
Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As Restated |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
(Note N) |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Operating Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
10,098 |
|
|
$ |
9,767 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income
to net cash provided from operating activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
12,045 |
|
|
|
11,550 |
|
Deferred income taxes and investment tax credits, net |
|
|
10,311 |
|
|
|
5,716 |
|
Allowance for equity funds used during construction |
|
|
(2,143 |
) |
|
|
(553 |
) |
Pension, postretirement, and other employee benefits |
|
|
3,938 |
|
|
|
3,538 |
|
Tax benefit of stock options |
|
|
1,087 |
|
|
|
611 |
|
Other, net |
|
|
5,307 |
|
|
|
(5,783 |
) |
Changes in certain current assets and liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables, net |
|
|
(26,469 |
) |
|
|
(12,243 |
) |
Fossil fuel stock |
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
(486 |
) |
Materials and supplies |
|
|
(409 |
) |
|
|
(750 |
) |
Other current assets |
|
|
(6,739 |
) |
|
|
(2,645 |
) |
Accounts payable |
|
|
(8,081 |
) |
|
|
2,604 |
|
Accrued taxes |
|
|
(709 |
) |
|
|
2,847 |
|
Accrued compensation |
|
|
(2,538 |
) |
|
|
(2,588 |
) |
Other current liabilities |
|
|
(682 |
) |
|
|
(1,631 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided from (used for) operating activities |
|
|
(4,894 |
) |
|
|
9,954 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross property additions |
|
|
(26,225 |
) |
|
|
(28,761 |
) |
Purchase of property from affiliates |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(67,093 |
) |
Other |
|
|
(507 |
) |
|
|
(1,211 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used for investing activities |
|
|
(26,732 |
) |
|
|
(97,065 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in notes payable, net |
|
|
41,803 |
|
|
|
17,586 |
|
Proceeds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other long-term debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
Preferred stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
45,000 |
|
Capital contributions from parent company |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,000 |
|
Redemptions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other long-term debt |
|
|
(500 |
) |
|
|
(500 |
) |
Mandatorily redeemable preferred securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(40,000 |
) |
Payment of preferred stock dividends |
|
|
(1,350 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Payment of common stock dividends |
|
|
(13,350 |
) |
|
|
(11,600 |
) |
Other |
|
|
(80 |
) |
|
|
109 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided from financing activities |
|
|
26,523 |
|
|
|
51,595 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Change in Cash and Cash Equivalents |
|
|
(5,103 |
) |
|
|
(35,516 |
) |
Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Period |
|
|
8,862 |
|
|
|
37,943 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Period |
|
$ |
3,759 |
|
|
$ |
2,427 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental Cash Flow Information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid during the period for |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest (net of $989 and $409 capitalized for
2005 and 2004, respectively) |
|
$ |
5,932 |
|
|
$ |
5,295 |
|
Income taxes (net of refunds) |
|
$ |
(384 |
) |
|
$ |
774 |
|
The accompanying notes as they relate to Savannah Electric are an integral part of these condensed financial statements.
91
SAVANNAH ELECTRIC AND POWER COMPANY
CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS (UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At June 30, |
|
|
At December 31, |
|
Assets |
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Current Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
3,759 |
|
|
$ |
8,862 |
|
Receivables |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer accounts receivable |
|
|
29,268 |
|
|
|
22,875 |
|
Unbilled revenues |
|
|
8,544 |
|
|
|
6,681 |
|
Under recovered regulatory clause revenues |
|
|
40,624 |
|
|
|
23,800 |
|
Other accounts and notes receivable |
|
|
1,539 |
|
|
|
1,608 |
|
Affiliated companies |
|
|
4,826 |
|
|
|
3,392 |
|
Accumulated provision for uncollectible accounts |
|
|
(854 |
) |
|
|
(878 |
) |
Fossil fuel stock, at average cost |
|
|
10,500 |
|
|
|
10,590 |
|
Materials and supplies, at average cost |
|
|
10,322 |
|
|
|
9,913 |
|
Prepaid income taxes |
|
|
23,684 |
|
|
|
21,615 |
|
Prepaid expenses |
|
|
1,690 |
|
|
|
1,415 |
|
Assets from risk management activities |
|
|
3,474 |
|
|
|
2,287 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
137,376 |
|
|
|
112,160 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, Plant, and Equipment: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In service |
|
|
1,025,924 |
|
|
|
945,359 |
|
Less accumulated provision for depreciation |
|
|
391,096 |
|
|
|
408,415 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
634,828 |
|
|
|
536,944 |
|
Construction work in progress |
|
|
9,871 |
|
|
|
91,275 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total property, plant, and equipment |
|
|
644,699 |
|
|
|
628,219 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Property and Investments |
|
|
3,993 |
|
|
|
3,925 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred Charges and Other Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred charges related to income taxes |
|
|
10,592 |
|
|
|
10,588 |
|
Cash surrender value of life insurance for
deferred compensation plans |
|
|
25,970 |
|
|
|
25,335 |
|
Unamortized debt issuance expense |
|
|
5,142 |
|
|
|
5,303 |
|
Unamortized loss on reacquired debt |
|
|
7,572 |
|
|
|
7,935 |
|
Other regulatory assets |
|
|
14,226 |
|
|
|
15,592 |
|
Other |
|
|
3,418 |
|
|
|
3,534 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred charges and other assets |
|
|
66,920 |
|
|
|
68,287 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets |
|
$ |
852,988 |
|
|
$ |
812,591 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes as they relate to Savannah Electric are an integral part of these condensed financial statements.
92
SAVANNAH ELECTRIC AND POWER COMPANY
CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS (UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At June 30, |
|
|
At December 31, |
|
Liabilities and Stockholders Equity |
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Current Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities due within one year |
|
$ |
21,031 |
|
|
$ |
1,010 |
|
Notes payable |
|
|
62,370 |
|
|
|
20,567 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Affiliated |
|
|
13,928 |
|
|
|
17,379 |
|
Other |
|
|
9,868 |
|
|
|
16,166 |
|
Customer deposits |
|
|
7,114 |
|
|
|
6,973 |
|
Accrued taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
148 |
|
Other |
|
|
4,829 |
|
|
|
5,390 |
|
Accrued interest |
|
|
3,201 |
|
|
|
3,050 |
|
Accrued vacation pay |
|
|
2,705 |
|
|
|
2,661 |
|
Accrued compensation |
|
|
3,074 |
|
|
|
5,612 |
|
Other |
|
|
7,690 |
|
|
|
6,765 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
135,810 |
|
|
|
85,721 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term Debt |
|
|
217,539 |
|
|
|
237,769 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred Credits and Other Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated deferred income taxes |
|
|
96,432 |
|
|
|
90,079 |
|
Deferred credits related to income taxes |
|
|
8,228 |
|
|
|
8,738 |
|
Accumulated deferred investment tax credits |
|
|
7,629 |
|
|
|
7,961 |
|
Employee benefit obligations |
|
|
50,518 |
|
|
|
46,580 |
|
Other cost of removal obligations |
|
|
43,798 |
|
|
|
41,890 |
|
Miscellaneous regulatory liabilities |
|
|
12,168 |
|
|
|
11,066 |
|
Other |
|
|
8,630 |
|
|
|
6,693 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred credits and other liabilities |
|
|
227,403 |
|
|
|
213,007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities |
|
|
580,752 |
|
|
|
536,497 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred Stock |
|
|
43,909 |
|
|
|
43,938 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stockholders Equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, par value $5 per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Authorized - 16,000,000 shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding - 10,844,635 shares |
|
|
54,223 |
|
|
|
54,223 |
|
Paid-in capital |
|
|
73,621 |
|
|
|
72,533 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
103,104 |
|
|
|
107,685 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
|
(2,621 |
) |
|
|
(2,285 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total common stockholders equity |
|
|
228,327 |
|
|
|
232,156 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities and Stockholders Equity |
|
$ |
852,988 |
|
|
$ |
812,591 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
93
SAVANNAH ELECTRIC AND POWER COMPANY
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
SECOND QUARTER 2005 vs. SECOND QUARTER 2004
AND
YEAR-TO-DATE 2005 vs. YEAR-TO-DATE 2004
OVERVIEW
Savannah Electric operates as a vertically integrated utility providing electricity to retail
customers within its traditional service area of southeastern Georgia. Many factors affect the
opportunities, challenges, and risks of Savannah Electrics business of selling electricity. These
factors include the ability to maintain a stable regulatory environment, to achieve energy sales
growth while containing costs, and to recover costs related to growing demand and increasingly
stringent environmental standards.
Savannah Electric continues to focus on several key performance indicators. These indicators
include customer satisfaction, peak season equivalent forced outage rate, and return on equity.
For additional information on these indicators, see MANAGEMENTS
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OVERVIEW
Key Performance Indicators of Savannah Electric in Item 7 of the Form 10-K.
See Note 9 to the financial statements of Savannah Electric in Item 8 of the Form 10-K and
Note (N) to the Condensed Financial Statements herein for information regarding Savannah Electrics
restatement of its financial statements for the second quarter and year-to-date June 30, 2004 as
the result of errors in the estimate of unbilled revenues for these periods.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Earnings
Savannah Electrics net income after dividends on preferred stock for the second quarter and
year-to-date 2005 was $7.7 million and $8.7 million, respectively, compared to $6.8 million and
$9.6 million, respectively, for the corresponding periods of 2004. Earnings increased by $0.9
million, or 13.9%, in the second quarter 2005, primarily due to increases in transmission revenues
and AFUDC equity related to the Plant McIntosh combined cycle units, partially off-set by higher
interest expense. Year-to-date 2005 earnings were down by $0.9 million, or 9.0%, as a result of
higher maintenance and interest expenses partially off-set by the increases in AFUDC equity and
transmission revenues in the second quarter of 2005.
Significant income statement items appropriate for discussion include the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (Decrease) |
|
|
|
Second Quarter |
|
|
Year-To-Date |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
% |
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
% |
|
Retail revenues |
|
$ |
3,627 |
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
$ |
21,122 |
|
|
|
13.6 |
|
Sales for resale affiliates |
|
|
(399 |
) |
|
|
(24.1 |
) |
|
|
(775 |
) |
|
|
(18.9 |
) |
Other revenues |
|
|
2,150 |
|
|
|
313.4 |
|
|
|
2,250 |
|
|
|
136.3 |
|
Fuel expense |
|
|
4,778 |
|
|
|
33.8 |
|
|
|
7,416 |
|
|
|
30.1 |
|
Purchased
power expense non-affiliates |
|
|
(2,042 |
) |
|
|
(46.5 |
) |
|
|
(2,498 |
) |
|
|
(37.1 |
) |
Purchased
power expense affiliates |
|
|
1,638 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
|
15,787 |
|
|
|
32.0 |
|
Maintenance expense |
|
|
(715 |
) |
|
|
(10.4 |
) |
|
|
2,740 |
|
|
|
20.5 |
|
Interest
expense, net of amounts capitalized |
|
|
617 |
|
|
|
20.6 |
|
|
|
697 |
|
|
|
11.4 |
|
Other income (expense), net |
|
|
1,148 |
|
|
|
N/M |
|
|
|
2,672 |
|
|
|
N/M |
|
Income taxes |
|
|
413 |
|
|
|
10.4 |
|
|
|
(1,038 |
) |
|
|
(18.6 |
) |
Dividends on preferred stock |
|
|
525 |
|
|
|
N/M |
|
|
|
1,200 |
|
|
|
N/M |
|
94
SAVANNAH ELECTRIC AND POWER COMPANY
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Retail revenues. The chart below reflects the primary drivers of the 4.1% second quarter and
13.6% year-to-date 2005 increases in retail revenues, compared to the same periods in the prior
year. Excluding fuel cost recovery revenues, which do not affect net income, retail revenue
decreased by $1.4 million, or 2.8%, in the second quarter 2005 and decreased by $1.2 million, or
1.4%, year-to-date 2005, when compared to the corresponding periods in 2004. For the second
quarter and year-to-date 2005, the base revenue decreases are primarily related to decreases in
residential sales due to mild weather. These decreases were partially offset by an increase in
commercial revenues reflecting restructured rates and the general base rate increases for all
classes effective June 2005.
Details of retail revenues are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second Quarter |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year-to-Date |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
% change |
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
% change |
|
Retail prior year |
|
$ |
87,516 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
155,025 |
|
|
|
|
|
Change in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Base rates |
|
|
1,005 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
1,005 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
Sales growth |
|
|
560 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
938 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
Weather |
|
|
(2,919 |
) |
|
|
(3.3 |
) |
|
|
(3,126 |
) |
|
|
(2.0 |
) |
Fuel cost recovery |
|
|
4,981 |
|
|
|
5.7 |
|
|
|
22,305 |
|
|
|
14.4 |
|
|
Retail current year |
|
$ |
91,143 |
|
|
|
4.1 |
% |
|
$ |
176,147 |
|
|
|
13.6 |
% |
|
Sales
for resale affiliates and Purchased power expense affiliates. Energy sales to and
purchases from affiliated companies within the Southern Company system will vary depending on
demand and the availability and cost of generating resources at each company. These sales and
purchases are made in accordance with the IIC, as approved by the FERC. Sales to affiliated
companies decreased for the second quarter and year-to-date 2005 when compared to the corresponding
periods in 2004 due to an increase in Savannah Electrics fuel costs relative to other Southern
Company generating plants and unavailability of Savannah Electrics plants due to scheduled
maintenance. Purchased power from affiliates increased year-to-date 2005 due to a 9.5% increase in
energy purchased as a result of scheduled maintenance on Savannah Electrics largest coal units and
an increase for the second quarter and year-to-date 2005 due to an increase in the average cost of
fuel per net kilowatt-hour generated. These transactions do not have a significant impact on
earnings since this energy is generally sold at marginal cost and energy purchases are generally
offset by energy revenues through Savannah Electrics fuel cost recovery clause.
Other revenues. Other revenues increased in the second quarter and year-to-date 2005 when
compared to the corresponding periods in 2004. The increases were primarily due to $1.96 million
in revenues associated with a transmission facilities agreement with Georgia Power related to the
Plant McIntosh combined cycle units. These revenues were recorded retroactive to June 2004,
following FERC approval of the contract which was received in May 2005. Approximately $0.9 million
of the revenues were related to 2004.
Fuel expense. Fuel expense increased in the second quarter and year-to-date 2005 primarily as
a result of the Plant McIntosh combined cycle units which were placed in service in June 2005, an
adjustment in 2004 as a result of billing credits relating to the Plant McIntosh combustion
turbines which reduced 2004 fuel expense, and an increase in the average cost of fuel per net
kilowatt-hour generated of 23% in the second quarter and 48% year-to-date 2005 when compared to the
same periods in the prior year. Since fuel expenses are generally offset by fuel
revenues through Savannah Electrics fuel cost recovery clause, these expenses do not have a
significant impact on net income.
95
SAVANNAH ELECTRIC AND POWER COMPANY
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Purchased
power expense non-affiliates. The decreases in the amount of purchased power from
non-affiliates in the second quarter and year-to-date 2005 when compared to the corresponding
periods in 2004 resulted from the increase in more economical purchased power from affiliates
discussed above. These transactions do not have a significant impact on earnings, as energy costs
are generally recovered through Savannah Electrics fuel cost recovery clause.
Maintenance expense. The decrease in the second quarter 2005 as compared to the same period
in the prior year is mainly due to an unscheduled coal mill repair at Plant Kraft in 2004.
Maintenance expense increased for the year-to-date 2005 as a result of scheduled maintenance
outages at Plant Kraft and Plant McIntosh and an increase in distribution expenses primarily
related to tree trimming.
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized. The increases in the second quarter and
year-to-date 2005 when compared to the corresponding periods in 2004 were primarily due to the
issuance in December 2004 of $35 million of senior notes and an increase in short-term borrowing
and higher interest rates.
Other income (expense), net and income taxes. In the second quarter and year-to-date 2005,
other income increased primarily due to an increase in non-taxable AFUDC equity of $0.5 million and
$1.6 million, respectively, associated with the Plant McIntosh combined cycle construction project.
The decrease in income taxes for the year-to-date 2005 as compared to the prior year is mainly
attributed to the increase in the non-taxable AFUDC equity. See Note 3 to the financial statements
of Savannah Electric under Plant McIntosh Construction Project in Item 8 of the Form 10-K for
additional information. AFUDC equity has substantially decreased following commercial operation of
the project in June 2005; thus Savannah Electrics annual effective income tax rate is expected to
be approximately 35% for 2005. See Note 5 to the financial statements of Savannah Electric in Item
8 of the Form 10-K and Note (H) to the Condensed Financial Statements herein for additional
information.
Dividends on preferred stock. Dividends on preferred stock increased for the second quarter
and year-to-date 2005 due to the issuance of 1.8 million shares of 6.00% Series Preferred Stock in
June 2004.
FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL
The results of operations discussed above are not necessarily indicative of Savannah Electrics
future earnings potential. The level of Savannah Electrics future earnings depends on numerous
factors that affect the opportunities, challenges, and risks of Savannah Electrics business of
selling electricity. These factors include Savannah Electrics ability to maintain a stable
regulatory environment, to achieve energy sales growth while containing costs, and to recover costs
related to growing demand and increasingly stringent environmental standards. Future earnings in
the near term will depend, in part, upon growth in energy sales, which is subject to a number of
factors. These factors include weather, competition, energy conservation practiced by customers,
the price of electricity, the price elasticity of demand, and the rate of economic growth in
Savannah Electrics service area. For additional information relating to these issues, see
BUSINESS The SOUTHERN System Risk Factors in Item 1 and MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND
ANALYSIS FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL of Savannah Electric in Item 7 of the Form 10-K.
96
SAVANNAH ELECTRIC AND POWER COMPANY
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Environmental Matters
Compliance costs related to the Clean Air Act and other environmental regulations could affect
earnings if such costs cannot be recovered. For additional information, including information on
certain environmental litigation, see MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS FUTURE EARNINGS
POTENTIAL Environmental Matters of Savannah Electric in Item 7 and Note 3 to the financial
statements of Savannah Electric under New Source Review Actions in Item 8 of the Form 10-K.
The EPA issued the final Clean Air Interstate Rule on March 10, 2005. The rule addresses
sulfur dioxide (SO2) and nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions that contribute to
nonattainment of the eight-hour ozone and fine particulate matter National Ambient Air Quality
Standards. Twenty-eight eastern states, including the State of Georgia, are subject to the fine
particulate and/or the eight-hour ozone requirements set forth within the rule. The rule may
require additional reductions of NOx and/or SO2 to be achieved by the
installation of additional controls at Savannah Electrics facilities or through the purchase of
allowances. The impact of this final rule on Savannah Electric will, however, depend on the outcome
of legal challenges and development and implementation of applicable state regulations and
therefore cannot be determined at this time.
On March 15, 2005, the EPA announced the final Clean Air Mercury Rule, selecting a
cap-and-trade approach to be implemented in two phases, 2010 and 2018. The rule sets a permanent
cap on emissions at the 2018 level and provides for an emissions allowance trading market. The
impact of this final rule on Savannah Electric will depend on the outcome of legal challenges and
development and implementation of applicable state regulations and therefore cannot be determined
at this time.
On June 15, 2005, the EPA issued final rules addressing Best Available Retrofit Technology
(BART) standards under the Regional Haze Program. States must develop regulations to implement the
federal regional haze requirements, including BART standards, by December 17, 2007. The impact of
the final BART rules on Savannah Electric will depend on the outcome of any litigation over the
final rules and the development and implementation of the applicable state regulations and
therefore cannot be determined at this time.
FERC and Georgia PSC Matters
Market-Based Rate Authority
See MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS FUTURE EARNINGS
POTENTIAL FERC and Georgia PSC Matters Market-Based Rate Authority of Savannah Electric in Item 7 and Note 3 to the
financial statements of Savannah Electric under Market-Based Rate Authority in Item 8 of the Form
10-K for information on the FERCs April 2004 order adopting a new interim analysis for measuring
generation market power and a proceeding initiated by the FERC in December 2004 to assess Southern
Companys generation dominance within its retail service territory. Savannah Electric has
authorization from the FERC
to sell power to non-affiliates at market-based prices. Savannah Electric, through SCS as agent,
also has FERC authority to make short-term opportunity sales at market rates. Specific FERC
approval must be obtained with respect to a market-based contract with an affiliate. On February
15, 2005, Southern Company submitted additional information related to generation dominance in its
retail service territory. On July 8, 2005, the FERC initiated a hearing before an administrative
law judge to review the generation market power issues. Any new market-based rate transactions in
Southern Companys retail service territory entered into after February 27, 2005 will be subject to
refund to the level of the default cost-based rates, pending the outcome of the proceeding. In the
event that the FERCs default mitigation measures are ultimately applied, Savannah Electric may be
required to charge cost-based rates for certain wholesale sales in the Southern Company retail
service territory, which may be
lower than negotiated market-based rates. The impact of such sales through June 30,
97
SAVANNAH ELECTRIC AND POWER COMPANY
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
2005 is not
material to Savannah Electrics net income. The final outcome of this matter will depend on the
form in which the final methodology for assessing generation market power and mitigation rules may
be ultimately adopted and cannot be determined at this time.
In addition, on May 5, 2005, the FERC issued an order expanding the generation market power
proceeding initiated in December 2004 to include an investigation of whether Southern Company
satisfies the other three parts of the FERCs market-based rate analysis: transmission market
power, barriers to entry, and affiliate abuse or reciprocal dealing. The FERC established a new
refund period related to this expanded investigation. Any and all new market-based rate
transactions involving any Southern Company subsidiary will be subject to refund to the extent the
FERC orders lower rates beginning July 19, 2005. The FERC also directed that this expanded
proceeding be held in abeyance pending the outcome of the proceeding on the IIC discussed below.
Southern Company and its subsidiaries believe that there is no meritorious basis for these
allegations and intend to vigorously defend themselves in the proceeding. However, the final
outcome of this matter, including any remedies to be applied in the event of an adverse ruling in
this proceeding, cannot now be determined.
Intercompany Interchange Contract
Also on May 5, 2005, the FERC initiated a new proceeding to examine (1) the provisions of the IIC
among Alabama Power, Georgia Power, Gulf Power, Mississippi Power, Savannah Electric, Southern
Power, and SCS, as agent, under the terms of which the power pool of Southern Company is operated,
and, in particular, the propriety of the continued inclusion of Southern Power as a party to the
IIC, (2) whether any parties to the IIC have violated the FERCs standards of conduct applicable to
utility companies that are transmission providers, and (3) whether Southern Companys code of
conduct defining Southern Power as a system company rather than a marketing affiliate is just
and reasonable. In 2000, in connection with the formation of Southern Power, the FERC authorized
Southern Powers inclusion in the IIC. The FERC also previously approved Southern Companys code
of conduct. The FERC order directs that the administrative law judge who presided over the
McIntosh PPA proceeding be assigned to preside over the hearing in this proceeding and that the
testimony and exhibits presented in that proceeding be preserved to the extent appropriate.
Effective July 19, 2005, revenues from transactions under the IIC involving any Southern Company
subsidiaries will be subject to refund to the extent the FERC orders any changes to the IIC. See
Note 3 to the financial statements of Savannah Electric under Plant McIntosh Construction Project
in Item 8 of the Form 10-K for additional information on the McIntosh PPA proceeding.
Southern Company and its subsidiaries believe that there is no meritorious basis for these
allegations and intend to vigorously defend themselves in the proceeding. However, the final
outcome of this matter, including any remedies to be applied in the event of an adverse ruling in
this proceeding, cannot now be determined.
Retail Rate Case Filing
See MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL FERC and Georgia PSC
Matters Retail Rate Case Filing in Item 7 and Note 3 to the financial statements of Savannah
Electric under Retail Regulatory Matters 2004 Retail Rate Case Filing in Item 8 of the Form
10-K and Note (M) to the Condensed Financial Statements herein for additional information.
On May 17, 2005, the Georgia PSC approved a new three-year retail rate plan for Savannah
Electric ending May 31, 2008 (2005 Plan). Under the terms of the 2005 Plan, earnings will be
evaluated against a retail return
on common equity range of 9.75% to 11.75%. Two-thirds of any earnings above 11.75% will be applied
to rate refunds with the remaining one-third retained by Savannah Electric. Retail base rates were
increased by
98
SAVANNAH ELECTRIC AND POWER COMPANY
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
approximately $9.6 million, or 5.1%, on an annual basis effective in June 2005 to
cover the cost of new generation and PPAs; higher operating and maintenance expenses; and continued
investment in new transmission and distribution facilities to support growth and ensure
reliability.
Savannah Electric will not file for a general base rate increase unless its projected retail
return on common equity falls below 9.75%. Savannah Electric is required to file a general rate
case on November 30, 2007, in response to which the Georgia PSC would be expected to determine
whether the rate plan should be continued, modified, or discontinued.
Retail Fuel Cost Recovery
At
June 30, 2005, Savannah Electrics under-recovered fuel
balance totaled $40.6 million. In response to this increase and
the expected continuation of rising fuel costs, Savannah Electric
anticipates filing a request with the Georgia PSC in August 2005
to increase its fuel cost recovery rate. In a separate proceeding,
on August 2, 2005, the Georgia PSC approved its staffs
recommendation to initiate an investigation of Savannah
Electrics fuel practices. The ultimate outcome of these matters
cannot now be determined.
Other Matters
In
July 2005, the U.S. Congress passed the Energy Policy Act of
2005 (Energy Act), which President Bush is expected to sign into law
in early August 2005. Among other things, the Energy Act
includes various tax subsidies for electric utilities and provisions
repealing the PUHCA. The Energy Act also amends federal energy laws
and provides the FERC with new oversight responsibilities for the
electric utility industry. The implementation of the Energy Act
requires proceedings at the state level and the development of
regulations by the FERC, as well as other federal agencies. Savannah
Electric is still reviewing the legislation; however, its impacts
will depend on the promulgation and implementation of final rules and
cannot be determined at this time.
Effective September 30, 2004, Savannah Electric retired Units 4 and 5 at Plant Riverside. The
remaining units at the plant were retired on May 31, 2005. These retirements had no material
impact on Savannah Electrics financial statements.
Savannah Electric is subject to certain claims and legal actions arising in the ordinary
course of business. In addition, Savannah Electrics business activities are subject to extensive
governmental regulation related to public health and the environment. Litigation over
environmental issues and claims of various types, including property damage, personal injury, and
citizen enforcement of environmental requirements, has increased generally throughout the United
States. In particular, personal injury claims for damages caused by alleged exposure to hazardous
materials have become more frequent. The ultimate outcome of such litigation against Savannah
Electric cannot be predicted at this time; however, management does not anticipate that the
liabilities, if any, arising from such current proceedings would have a material adverse effect on
Savannah Electrics financial statements.
See the Notes to the Condensed Financial Statements herein for discussion of various
contingencies and other matters which may affect future earnings potential.
ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Application of Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Savannah Electric prepares its financial statements in accordance with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States. Significant accounting policies are described in Note 1
to the financial statements of Savannah Electric in Item 8 of the Form 10-K. In the application of
these policies, certain estimates are made that may have a material impact on Savannah Electrics
results of operations and related disclosures. Different assumptions and
measurements could produce estimates that are significantly different from those recorded in the
financial statements. Also see MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND
ANALYSIS ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Application of Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates of Savannah Electric in Item 7 of the
99
SAVANNAH ELECTRIC AND POWER COMPANY
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Form 10-K for a complete discussion of Savannah Electrics critical accounting policies and
estimates related to Electric Utility Regulation, Contingent Obligations, and Unbilled Revenues.
New Accounting Standards
FASB Statement No. 123R, Share-Based Payments, was issued in December 2004. This statement
requires that compensation cost relating to share-based payment transactions be recognized in
financial statements. That cost will be measured based on the grant date fair value of the equity
instruments issued. In April 2005, the SEC amended the compliance dates for FASB Statement No.
123R. For Savannah Electric, this statement is now effective beginning January 1, 2006. Although
the compensation expense calculation required under the revised statement differs slightly, the
impacts on Savannah Electrics financial statements are expected to be similar to the pro forma
disclosures included in Note 1 to the financial statements of Savannah Electric under Stock
Options in Item 8 of the Form 10-K and in Note (C) to the Condensed Financial Statements herein.
FASB Interpretation No. 47 (FIN 47), Accounting for Conditional Asset Retirement Obligations,
was issued in March 2005. This interpretation requires that asset retirement obligations be
recorded when a legal obligation exists even though the timing and/or the method of settlement are
conditional on a future event. For Savannah Electric, FIN 47 is effective no later than December
31, 2005. Savannah Electric is currently assessing the impact of FIN 47 on its balance sheet;
however, adoption is not currently expected to have a material impact on Savannah Electrics income
statement.
In December 2004, the FASB issued Staff Position No. 109-1 (FSP 109-1), Application of FASB
Statement No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes, to the Tax Deduction on Qualified Production
Activities provided by the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004, which requires that the generation
deduction for utilities be accounted for as a special tax deduction rather than as a tax rate
reduction. Savannah Electric adopted FSP 109-1 in the first quarter of 2005 with no material
impact on its financial statements.
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND LIQUIDITY
Overview
Savannah Electrics financial condition remained stable at June 30, 2005. Net cash flow provided
from (used in) operating activities totaled $(4.9) million for the first six months of 2005,
compared to $10.0 million for the first six months of 2004. The $14.9 million decrease in 2005
resulted primarily from higher fuel costs. Those costs are recoverable in future periods and are
reflected on the balance sheets as under recovered regulatory clause revenues. Major changes in
Savannah Electrics financial condition during the first six months of 2005 included the addition
of approximately $26.2 million to utility plant, which includes the Plant McIntosh combined cycle
construction project. The funds for these additions and other capital requirements were derived
primarily from short-term debt. See Savannah Electrics Condensed Statements of Cash Flows herein
for further details.
Capital Requirements and Contractual Obligations
See MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS FINANCIAL CONDITION AND LIQUIDITY Capital
Requirements and Contractual Obligations of Savannah Electric in Item 7 of the Form 10-K for a
description of Savannah Electrics capital requirements for its construction program, lease
obligations, purchase
commitments, and trust funding requirements. Approximately $21 million will be required by June
30, 2006 for redemptions and maturities of long-term debt.
100
SAVANNAH ELECTRIC AND POWER COMPANY
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Sources of Capital
Savannah Electric plans to obtain the funds required for construction and other purposes from
sources similar to those used in the past, including funds from operations and new securities
issuances. The amount, type, and timing of any future financings if needed will depend upon
maintenance of adequate earnings, regulatory approval, prevailing market conditions, and other
factors. See MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND LIQUIDITY Sources
of Capital of Savannah Electric in Item 7 of the Form 10-K for additional information.
To meet short-term cash needs and contingencies, Savannah Electric had at June 30, 2005
approximately $3.8 million of cash and cash equivalents and $80 million of unused committed credit
arrangements with banks, of which $31 million expire in 2005, $29 million expire in 2006, and $20
million expires in 2008. All of the unused credit arrangements expiring in 2005 include two-year
term loan options executable at the expiration date. The credit arrangements provide liquidity
support to some of Savannah Electrics obligations with respect to its variable rate debt and its
commercial paper. Savannah Electric expects to renew its credit facilities, as needed, prior to
expiration. Savannah Electric may also meet short-term cash needs through a Southern Company
subsidiary organized to issue and sell commercial paper and extendible commercial notes at the
request and for the benefit of Savannah Electric and other Southern Company subsidiaries. At June
30, 2005, Savannah Electric had $48.4 million of outstanding commercial paper and $14.0 million of
outstanding extendible commercial notes.
Credit Rating Risk
Savannah Electric does not have any credit arrangements that would require material changes in
payment schedules or terminations as a result of a credit rating downgrade. Savannah Electric is
party to certain derivatives agreements that could require collateral and/or accelerated payment in
the event of a credit rating change to below investment grade. These agreements are primarily for
natural gas price and interest rate risk management activities. At June 30, 2005, Savannah
Electric had no exposure under these contracts.
Market Price Risk
Savannah Electrics market risk exposures relative to interest rate changes have not changed
materially compared with the December 31, 2004 reporting period. In addition, Savannah Electric is
not aware of any facts or circumstances that would significantly affect such exposures in the near
term.
Due to cost-based rate regulations, Savannah Electric has limited exposure to market
volatility in interest rates, commodity fuel prices, and prices of electricity. To mitigate
residual risks relative to movements in electricity prices, Savannah Electric enters into
fixed-price contracts for the purchase and sale of electricity through the wholesale electricity
market. Savannah Electric has also implemented a retail fuel hedging program at the instruction of
the Georgia PSC.
101
SAVANNAH
ELECTRIC AND POWER COMPANY
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The fair value of derivative energy contracts at June 30, 2005 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second Quarter |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
Year-to-Date |
|
|
|
Changes |
|
|
Changes |
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Contracts beginning of period |
|
$ |
8,034 |
|
|
$ |
1,474 |
|
Contracts realized or settled |
|
|
(2,712 |
) |
|
|
(2,733 |
) |
New contracts at inception |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in valuation techniques |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current period changes (a) |
|
|
(158 |
) |
|
|
6,423 |
|
|
Contracts at June 30, 2005 |
|
$ |
5,164 |
|
|
$ |
5,164 |
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Current period changes also include the changes in fair value of new contracts
entered into during the period. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Source of June 30, 2005 |
|
|
|
Valuation Prices |
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
Maturity |
|
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Year 1 |
|
|
1-3 Years |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Actively quoted |
|
$ |
5,167 |
|
|
$ |
2,993 |
|
|
$ |
2,174 |
|
External sources |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Models and other methods |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contracts at June 30, 2005 |
|
$ |
5,164 |
|
|
$ |
2,990 |
|
|
$ |
2,174 |
|
|
For additional information, see MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
LIQUIDITY Market Price Risk of Savannah Electric in Item 7 and Notes 1 and 6 to the financial
statements of Savannah Electric under Financial Instruments in Item 8 of the Form 10-K and Note
(F) to the Condensed Financial Statements herein.
Financing Activities
Savannah Electric did not issue or redeem any long-term securities during the first six months of
2005. In addition to any financings that may be necessary to meet capital requirements and
contractual obligations, Savannah Electric plans to continue, when economically feasible, a program
to retire higher-cost securities and replace these obligations with lower-cost capital if market
conditions permit.
In the first six months of 2005, Savannah Electric entered into a forward starting interest
rate swap in order to mitigate its exposure to unfavorable changes in interest rates related to a
series of senior notes Savannah Electric anticipates to issue in 2006. See Note (F) to the
Condensed Financial Statements herein for additional information.
102
SOUTHERN POWER COMPANY
103
SOUTHERN POWER COMPANY
CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF INCOME (UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months |
|
|
For the Six Months |
|
|
|
Ended June 30, |
|
|
Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Operating Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales for resale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-affiliates |
|
$ |
39,703 |
|
|
$ |
73,032 |
|
|
$ |
79,807 |
|
|
$ |
159,731 |
|
Affiliates |
|
|
109,217 |
|
|
|
107,218 |
|
|
|
221,554 |
|
|
|
194,013 |
|
Other revenues |
|
|
306 |
|
|
|
2,499 |
|
|
|
686 |
|
|
|
4,610 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating revenues |
|
|
149,226 |
|
|
|
182,749 |
|
|
|
302,047 |
|
|
|
358,354 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fuel |
|
|
26,730 |
|
|
|
43,998 |
|
|
|
61,274 |
|
|
|
74,333 |
|
Purchased power |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-affiliates |
|
|
10,772 |
|
|
|
25,813 |
|
|
|
19,634 |
|
|
|
39,418 |
|
Affiliates |
|
|
16,159 |
|
|
|
28,926 |
|
|
|
37,113 |
|
|
|
70,982 |
|
Other operations |
|
|
13,814 |
|
|
|
13,529 |
|
|
|
26,533 |
|
|
|
28,254 |
|
Maintenance |
|
|
4,939 |
|
|
|
4,407 |
|
|
|
8,198 |
|
|
|
7,419 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
13,109 |
|
|
|
12,796 |
|
|
|
25,892 |
|
|
|
25,574 |
|
Taxes other than income taxes |
|
|
3,092 |
|
|
|
2,718 |
|
|
|
6,047 |
|
|
|
5,397 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
88,615 |
|
|
|
132,187 |
|
|
|
184,691 |
|
|
|
251,377 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Income |
|
|
60,611 |
|
|
|
50,562 |
|
|
|
117,356 |
|
|
|
106,977 |
|
Other Income and (Expense): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized |
|
|
(19,935 |
) |
|
|
(14,323 |
) |
|
|
(39,179 |
) |
|
|
(26,909 |
) |
Other income (expense), net |
|
|
202 |
|
|
|
1,271 |
|
|
|
294 |
|
|
|
1,764 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income and (expense) |
|
|
(19,733 |
) |
|
|
(13,052 |
) |
|
|
(38,885 |
) |
|
|
(25,145 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings Before Income Taxes |
|
|
40,878 |
|
|
|
37,510 |
|
|
|
78,471 |
|
|
|
81,832 |
|
Income taxes |
|
|
15,644 |
|
|
|
15,093 |
|
|
|
30,164 |
|
|
|
32,230 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income |
|
$ |
25,234 |
|
|
$ |
22,417 |
|
|
$ |
48,307 |
|
|
$ |
49,602 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months |
|
|
For the Six Months |
|
|
|
Ended June 30, |
|
|
Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Net Income |
|
$ |
25,234 |
|
|
$ |
22,417 |
|
|
$ |
48,307 |
|
|
$ |
49,602 |
|
Other comprehensive income (loss): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in fair value of qualifying
hedges, net of tax of $50, $104,
$50 and $(418), respectively |
|
|
72 |
|
|
|
166 |
|
|
|
72 |
|
|
|
(762 |
) |
Reclassification adjustment for
amounts included in net income,
net of tax of $1,050, $886,
$2,091 and $1,873, respectively |
|
|
1,620 |
|
|
|
1,414 |
|
|
|
3,232 |
|
|
|
2,983 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME |
|
$ |
26,926 |
|
|
$ |
23,997 |
|
|
$ |
51,611 |
|
|
$ |
51,823 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes as they relate to Southern Power are an integral part of these condensed financial statements.
104
SOUTHERN POWER COMPANY
CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Six Months |
|
|
|
Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Operating Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
48,307 |
|
|
$ |
49,602 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income
to net cash provided from operating activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
33,271 |
|
|
|
32,521 |
|
Deferred income taxes and investment
tax credits, net |
|
|
23,272 |
|
|
|
20,281 |
|
Deferred revenues |
|
|
(26,309 |
) |
|
|
(14,972 |
) |
Tax benefit of stock options |
|
|
231 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
Other, net |
|
|
(1,205 |
) |
|
|
483 |
|
Changes in certain current assets
and liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables, net |
|
|
(34,828 |
) |
|
|
(32,912 |
) |
Fossil fuel stock |
|
|
(3,092 |
) |
|
|
2,880 |
|
Materials and supplies |
|
|
(2,494 |
) |
|
|
(1,493 |
) |
Other current assets |
|
|
5,659 |
|
|
|
10,480 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
213 |
|
|
|
(21,417 |
) |
Accrued taxes |
|
|
6,794 |
|
|
|
5,577 |
|
Accrued interest |
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
(291 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided from operating activities |
|
|
49,868 |
|
|
|
50,839 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross property additions |
|
|
(218,822 |
) |
|
|
(94,991 |
) |
Sale of property to affiliates |
|
|
|
|
|
|
400,346 |
|
Change in construction payables, net |
|
|
(103 |
) |
|
|
(9,463 |
) |
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
778 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided from (used for) investing activities |
|
|
(218,925 |
) |
|
|
296,670 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in notes payable, net |
|
|
163,090 |
|
|
|
(90,218 |
) |
Redemptions Other long-term debt |
|
|
(200 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Capital distributions to parent company |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(225,000 |
) |
Other |
|
|
(958 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided from (used for) financing activities |
|
|
161,932 |
|
|
|
(315,218 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Change in Cash and Cash Equivalents |
|
|
(7,125 |
) |
|
|
32,291 |
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Period |
|
|
25,241 |
|
|
|
2,798 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Period |
|
$ |
18,116 |
|
|
$ |
35,089 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental Cash Flow Information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid during the period for
|
|
Interest (net of $0 and $15,544 capitalized for
2005 and 2004, respectively) |
|
$ |
31,562 |
|
|
$ |
19,839 |
|
Income taxes (net of refunds) |
|
$ |
3,582 |
|
|
$ |
2,201 |
|
The accompanying notes as they relate to Southern Power are an integral part of these condensed financial statements.
105
SOUTHERN POWER COMPANY
CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS (UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At June 30, |
|
|
At December 31, |
|
Assets |
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Current Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
18,116 |
|
|
$ |
25,241 |
|
Receivables |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer accounts receivable |
|
|
16,705 |
|
|
|
12,865 |
|
Other accounts receivable |
|
|
1,134 |
|
|
|
893 |
|
Accumulated provision for uncollectible accounts |
|
|
(350 |
) |
|
|
(350 |
) |
Affiliated companies |
|
|
56,170 |
|
|
|
25,423 |
|
Fossil fuel stock, at average cost |
|
|
5,997 |
|
|
|
2,904 |
|
Materials and supplies, at average cost |
|
|
12,333 |
|
|
|
9,839 |
|
Prepaid income taxes |
|
|
6,575 |
|
|
|
4,619 |
|
Prepaid expenses |
|
|
3,440 |
|
|
|
8,085 |
|
Other |
|
|
83 |
|
|
|
112 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
120,203 |
|
|
|
89,631 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, Plant, and Equipment: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In service |
|
|
2,028,502 |
|
|
|
1,821,434 |
|
Less accumulated provision for depreciation |
|
|
137,110 |
|
|
|
111,200 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,891,392 |
|
|
|
1,710,234 |
|
Construction work in progress |
|
|
202,243 |
|
|
|
200,903 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total property, plant, and equipment |
|
|
2,093,635 |
|
|
|
1,911,137 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred Charges and Other Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unamortized debt issuance expense |
|
|
13,183 |
|
|
|
14,078 |
|
Prepaid long-term service agreements |
|
|
45,492 |
|
|
|
34,800 |
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Affiliated |
|
|
6,517 |
|
|
|
6,455 |
|
Other |
|
|
10,868 |
|
|
|
10,912 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred charges and other assets |
|
|
76,060 |
|
|
|
66,245 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets |
|
$ |
2,289,898 |
|
|
$ |
2,067,013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes as they relate to Southern Power are an integral part of these condensed financial statements.
106
SOUTHERN POWER COMPANY
CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS (UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At June 30, |
|
|
At December 31, |
|
Liabilities and
Stockholders Equity |
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Current Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities due within one year |
|
$ |
200 |
|
|
$ |
200 |
|
Notes payable |
|
|
163,090 |
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Affiliated |
|
|
24,756 |
|
|
|
19,265 |
|
Other |
|
|
5,751 |
|
|
|
11,024 |
|
Accrued taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes |
|
|
4,108 |
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued taxes Other |
|
|
9,159 |
|
|
|
4,104 |
|
Accrued interest |
|
|
28,675 |
|
|
|
28,626 |
|
Other |
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
83 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
235,750 |
|
|
|
63,302 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term Debt |
|
|
1,099,423 |
|
|
|
1,099,435 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred Credits and Other Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated deferred income taxes |
|
|
65,625 |
|
|
|
40,212 |
|
Deferred capacity revenues Affiliated |
|
|
12,579 |
|
|
|
39,118 |
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Affiliated |
|
|
12,774 |
|
|
|
13,333 |
|
Other |
|
|
294 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred credits and other liabilities |
|
|
91,272 |
|
|
|
92,665 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities |
|
|
1,426,445 |
|
|
|
1,255,402 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stockholders Equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, par value $.01 per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Authorized - 1,000,000 shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding - 1,000 shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paid-in capital |
|
|
740,766 |
|
|
|
740,535 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
170,441 |
|
|
|
122,134 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
|
(47,754 |
) |
|
|
(51,058 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total common stockholders equity |
|
|
863,453 |
|
|
|
811,611 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities and Stockholders Equity |
|
$ |
2,289,898 |
|
|
$ |
2,067,013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
accompanying notes as they relate to Southern Power are an integral
part of these condensed financial statements.
107
SOUTHERN POWER COMPANY
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
SECOND QUARTER 2005 vs. SECOND QUARTER 2004
AND
YEAR-TO-DATE 2005 vs. YEAR-TO-DATE 2004
OVERVIEW
Southern Power constructs, owns, and manages Southern Companys competitive generation assets and
sells electricity at market-based rates in the Super Southeast wholesale market. Southern Power
continues to focus on executing its regional strategy in the Super Southeast in 2005. Southern
Power continues to address questions at the federal regulatory level relative to market power and
affiliate transactions. See FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL FERC Matters herein for additional
detail.
To evaluate operating results and to ensure Southern Powers ability to meet its
contractual commitments to customers, Southern Power focuses on two key performance indicators.
These indicators consist of plant availability and peak season equivalent forced outage rate
(EFOR). Plant availability shows the percentage of time during the year that Southern Powers
generating units are available to be called upon to generate (the higher the better), whereas
the EFOR more narrowly defines the hours during peak demand times when Southern Powers
generating units are not available due to forced outages (the lower the better). For additional
information on these indicators, see MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND
ANALYSIS OVERVIEW Key
Performance Indicators of Southern Power in Item 7 of the Form 10-K.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Earnings
Southern Powers net income for the second quarter and year-to-date 2005 was $25.2 million and
$48.3 million compared to $22.4 million and $49.6 million, respectively, for the corresponding
periods of 2004. The increase in second quarter 2005 earnings of $2.8 million, or 12.6%, was
primarily the result of new operations at Plant Oleander and lower purchased power and fuel
expenses. The decrease in year-to-date 2005 earnings of $1.3 million, or 2.6%, is primarily a
result of ceasing the capitalization of interest on construction. Capitalization of construction
interest ended with the sale of Plant McIntosh Units 10 and 11 to Georgia Power and Savannah
Electric in May 2004 and the cessation of construction activities at Plant Franklin Unit 3 in
August 2004. For further information, see Note 2 to the financial statements of Southern Power
under Plant Franklin Unit 3 Construction Project and Plant McIntosh Construction Project in
Item 8 of the Form 10-K. Also see Note (O) to the Condensed Financial Statements herein for
information on the acquisition of Oleander Power Project, L.P. (Oleander) in June 2005.
Significant income statement items appropriate for discussion include the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (Decrease) |
|
|
Second Quarter |
|
Year-To-Date |
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
% |
|
(in thousands) |
|
% |
Sales for
resale non-affiliates |
|
$ |
(33,329 |
) |
|
|
(45.6 |
) |
|
$ |
(79,924 |
) |
|
|
(50.0 |
) |
Sales for
resale affiliates |
|
$ |
1,999 |
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
27,541 |
|
|
|
14.2 |
|
Other revenues |
|
|
(2,193 |
) |
|
|
(87.8 |
) |
|
|
(3,924 |
) |
|
|
(85.1 |
) |
Fuel expense |
|
|
(17,268 |
) |
|
|
(39.2 |
) |
|
|
(13,059 |
) |
|
|
(17.6 |
) |
Purchased
power expense non-affiliates |
|
|
(15,041 |
) |
|
|
(58.3 |
) |
|
|
(19,784 |
) |
|
|
(50.2 |
) |
Purchased
power expense affiliates |
|
|
(12,767 |
) |
|
|
(44.1 |
) |
|
|
(33,869 |
) |
|
|
(47.7 |
) |
Interest expense, net of amounts
capitalized |
|
|
(5,612 |
) |
|
|
(39.2 |
) |
|
|
(12,270 |
) |
|
|
(45.6 |
) |
108
SOUTHERN
POWER COMPANY
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Sales
for resale affiliates and non-affiliates. Second quarter and year-to-date 2005
revenues from sales for resale to non-affiliates decreased and sales to affiliates increased when
compared to the corresponding periods in 2004 due primarily to the inception of a new PPA with
Georgia Power at Plant Harris Unit 2 and a scheduled increase in the existing PPA with Georgia
Power at Plant Franklin Unit 2 in June 2004. These units were initially placed into service in June
2003 and were previously available for market sales to non-affiliates until the commencement of the
affiliate PPAs. Reductions in operating revenues at Plant Harris Unit 2 and Plant Franklin Unit 2
caused by the shift from market sales of this capacity to sales to affiliates under PPAs in June
2004 were largely offset by reductions in purchased power expense and fuel expense.
Other revenues. In the second quarter and year-to-date 2005, other revenues decreased when
compared to the corresponding quarter and year-to-date 2004. This decrease was primarily due to
the expiration of a contract that included significant transmission components, as well as the
inception of the PPA with Georgia Power at Plant Harris Unit 2.
Fuel expense. Fuel expense in the second quarter 2005 decreased when compared to the same
period in 2004 despite a 13% increase in fuel prices. The reduction is attributed to 15% lower
generation during the second quarter 2005 at Plant Wansley due to milder weather when compared to
the second quarter 2004. Also contributing was the shift of fuel responsibility for Plant Harris
Unit 2 and a portion of Plant Franklin Unit 2 to Georgia Power beginning in June 2004 in accordance
with the terms of the PPAs. The year-to-date 2005 decrease when compared to the same period in
2004 is primarily due to the inception of the Georgia Power PPA at Plant Harris Unit 2 and the full
commitment of Plant Franklin Unit 2. Existing PPAs generally provide that the purchasers are
responsible for substantially all of the fuel costs relating to energy delivered under the PPAs;
therefore, changes in fuel expenses do not have a significant impact on net income.
Purchased
power expense affiliates and non-affiliates. The decreases in purchased power
from affiliates and non-affiliates during the second quarter and year-to-date 2005 when compared to
the corresponding periods of 2004 are primarily due to the commitment of Plant Harris Unit 2 and
the commitment of an additional portion of Plant Franklin Unit 2 to Georgia Power beginning in June
2004; prior to that time the capacity from these units was sold into short-term markets and related
energy sales were sometimes served with short-term power purchases from both affiliates and
non-affiliates when market costs were lower than the cost of self-generation.
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized. Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized
increased in the second quarter and year-to-date 2005 when compared to the same periods in 2004
primarily as the result of ceasing the capitalization of interest on construction. Capitalized
interest on construction ended with the sale of Plant McIntosh Units 10 and 11 to Georgia Power and
Savannah Electric in May 2004 and the cessation of construction activities at Plant Franklin Unit 3
in August 2004. For further information, see Note 2 to the financial statements of Southern Power
under Plant Franklin Unit 3 Construction Project and Plant McIntosh Construction Project in
Item 8 of the Form 10-K. Interest expense also increased due to additional financing for the
purchase of the Oleander plant in June 2005.
FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL
The results of operations discussed above are not necessarily indicative of future earnings.
Several factors affect the opportunities, challenges, and risks of Southern Powers competitive
wholesale energy business. These factors include the ability to achieve sales growth while
containing costs. Another major factor is federal regulatory policy, which may impact Southern
Powers level of participation in this market. The level of future earnings depends on numerous
factors, especially regulatory matters, including those related to affiliate contracts, sales,
creditworthiness of customers, total generating capacity available in the Southeast, and the
109
SOUTHERN
POWER COMPANY
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
successful remarketing of capacity as current contracts expire. For additional information
relating to these issues, see BUSINESS The SOUTHERN System
Risk Factors in Item 1 and
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL of Southern Power in Item 7 of the Form 10-K.
FERC Matters
See
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND
ANALYSIS FUTURE
EARNINGS POTENTIAL FERC Matters
Market-Based Rate Authority of Southern Power in Item 7 and Note 2 to the financial statements of
Southern Power under FERC Matters Market-Based Rate Authority in Item 8 of the Form 10-K for
information on the FERCs April 2004 order adopting a new interim analysis for measuring generation
market power and a proceeding initiated by the FERC in December 2004 to assess Southern Companys
generation dominance within its retail service territory. Southern Power has authorization from
the FERC to sell power to non-affiliates at market-based prices. Southern Power, through SCS as
agent, also has FERC authority to make short-term opportunity sales at market rates. Specific FERC
approval must be obtained with respect to a market-based contract with an affiliate. On February
15, 2005, Southern Company submitted additional information related to generation dominance in its
retail service territory. On July 8, 2005, the FERC initiated a hearing before an administrative
law judge to review the generation market power issues. Any new market-based rate transactions in
Southern Companys retail service territory entered into after February 27, 2005 will be subject to
refund to the level of the default cost-based rates, pending the outcome of the proceeding. In the
event that the FERCs default mitigation measures are ultimately applied, Southern Power may be
required to charge cost-based rates for certain wholesale sales in the Southern Company retail
service territory, which may be lower than negotiated market-based rates. The impact of such sales
through June 30, 2005 is not material to Southern Powers net income. The final outcome of this
matter will depend on the form in which the final methodology for assessing generation market power
and mitigation rules may be ultimately adopted and cannot be determined at this time.
In addition, on May 5, 2005, the FERC issued an order expanding the generation market power
proceeding initiated in December 2004 to include an investigation of whether Southern Company
satisfies the other three parts of the FERCs market-based rate analysis: transmission market
power, barriers to entry, and affiliate abuse or reciprocal dealing. The FERC established a new
refund period related to this expanded investigation. Any and all new market-based rate
transactions involving any Southern Company subsidiary will be subject to refund to the extent the
FERC orders lower rates beginning July 19, 2005. The FERC also directed that this expanded
proceeding be held in abeyance pending the outcome of the proceeding on the IIC discussed below.
Southern Company and its subsidiaries believe that there is no meritorious basis for these
allegations and intend to vigorously defend themselves in the proceeding. However, the final
outcome of this matter, including any remedies to be applied in the event of an adverse ruling in
this proceeding, cannot now be determined.
Intercompany Interchange Contract
Also on May 5, 2005, the FERC initiated a new proceeding to examine (1) the provisions of the IIC
among Alabama Power, Georgia Power, Gulf Power, Mississippi Power, Savannah Electric, Southern
Power, and SCS, as agent, under the terms of which the power pool of Southern Company is operated,
and, in particular, the propriety of the continued inclusion of Southern Power as a party to the
IIC, (2) whether any parties to the IIC have violated the FERCs standards of conduct applicable to
utility companies that are transmission providers, and (3) whether Southern Companys code of
conduct defining Southern Power as a system company rather than a marketing affiliate is just
and reasonable. In 2000, in connection with the formation of Southern Power, the FERC authorized
Southern Powers inclusion in the IIC. The FERC also previously approved
110
SOUTHERN
POWER COMPANY
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Southern Companys code
of conduct. The FERC order directs that the administrative law judge who presided over the
McIntosh PPA proceeding be assigned to preside over the hearing in this proceeding and that the
testimony and exhibits presented in that proceeding be preserved to the extent appropriate. See
Note 2 to the financial statements of Southern Power under Plant McIntosh Construction Project in
Item 8 of the Form 10-K for more information on the McIntosh PPA proceeding. Effective July 19, 2005, revenues from
transactions under the IIC involving any Southern Company subsidiaries will be subject to refund to
the extent the FERC orders any changes to the IIC.
Southern Company and its subsidiaries believe that there is no meritorious basis for these
allegations and intend to vigorously defend themselves in the proceeding. However, the final
outcome of this matter, including any remedies to be applied in the event of an adverse ruling in
this proceeding, cannot now be determined.
Other Matters
See
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS FUTURE EARNINGS
POTENTIAL General and Power Sales
Agreements of Southern Power in Item 7 of the Form 10-K for additional information on long-term
power sales agreements and PPAs. Southern Powers PPAs with non-affiliated counterparties have
provisions that require the posting of collateral or an acceptable substitute guarantee in the
event that the counterparty does not meet certain rating or financial requirements. The PPAs are
expected to provide Southern Power with a stable source of revenue during their respective terms.
On June 7, 2005, Southern Power, through certain of its wholly-owned subsidiaries, acquired
all of the outstanding general and limited partnership interests of Oleander from Constellation
Power, Inc. and certain other subsidiaries of Constellation Energy Group, Inc. Southern Powers
acquisition of the general and limited partnership interests in Oleander was pursuant to a Purchase
and Sale Agreement dated April 8, 2005, for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $206
million, plus approximately $12 million of working capital and other adjustments. The purchase was
for a dual-fueled generating plant in Brevard County, Florida with a nominal installed capacity of
680 MW. The entire output of the plant is sold under separate PPAs with Florida Power & Light
Company and Seminole Electric Cooperative, Inc. The PPAs expire in 2007 and 2009, respectively.
See Note (O) to the Condensed Financial Statements herein for additional information.
See
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL Environmental Matters
of Southern Power in Item 7 of the Form 10-K for information on the development by federal and
state environmental regulatory agencies of additional control strategies for emission of air
pollution from industrial sources, including electric generating facilities. Compliance costs
related to current and future environmental laws and regulations could affect earnings if such
costs are not fully recovered.
In
July 2005, the U.S. Congress passed the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (Energy
Act), which President Bush is expected to sign into law in early August 2005. Among
other things, the Energy Act includes various tax subsidies for electric utilities
and provisions repealing the PUHCA. The Energy Act also amends federal energy laws
and provides the FERC with new oversight responsibilities for the electric utility
industry. The implementation of the Energy Act requires proceedings at the state
level and the development of regulations by the FERC, as well as other federal
agencies. Southern Power is still reviewing the legislation; however, its impacts
will depend on the promulgation and implementation of final rules and cannot be
determined at this time.
Southern Power is subject to certain claims and legal actions arising in the ordinary course
of business. In addition, Southern Powers business activities are subject to extensive
governmental regulation related to public health and the environment. Litigation over
environmental issues and claims of various types, including property damage, personal injury, and
citizen enforcement of environmental requirements, has increased generally throughout the United
States. In particular, personal injury claims for damages caused by alleged exposure to hazardous
materials have become more frequent. No such litigation is currently pending against Southern
Power.
111
SOUTHERN
POWER COMPANY
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
See the Notes to the Condensed Financial Statements herein for discussion of various
contingencies and other matters which may affect future earnings potential.
ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Application of Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Southern Power prepares its financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States. Significant accounting policies are described in Note 1 to the
financial statements of Southern Power in Item 8 of the Form 10-K. In the application of these
policies, certain estimates are made that may have a material impact on Southern Powers results of
operations and related disclosures. Different assumptions and measurements could produce estimates
that are significantly different from those recorded in the financial statements. Also see
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND
ANALYSIS
ACCOUNTING POLICIES Application of Critical
Accounting Policies and Estimates of Southern Power in Item 7 of the Form 10-K for a complete
discussion of Southern Powers critical accounting policies and estimates related to Revenue
Recognition and Asset Impairments.
New Accounting Standards
FASB Interpretation No. 47 (FIN 47), Accounting for Conditional Asset Retirement Obligations, was
issued in March 2005. This interpretation requires that asset retirement obligations be recorded
when a legal obligation exists even though the timing and/or the method of settlement are
conditional on a future event. For Southern Power, FIN 47 is effective no later than December 31,
2005. Southern Power is currently assessing the impact of FIN 47 on its financial statements.
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND LIQUIDITY
Overview
Major changes in Southern Powers financial condition during the second quarter 2005 included the
purchase of Oleander which closed on June 7, 2005. This acquisition of Oleander contributed an
additional $218 million of utility plant and working capital items. This acquisition was financed
with the addition of $143 million of commercial paper as well as funds generated from operations
Capital Requirements and Contractual Obligations
See
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND LIQUIDITY Capital Requirements
and Contractual Obligations of Southern Power in Item 7 of the Form 10-K for a description of
Southern Powers capital requirements for its construction program, maturing debt, purchase
commitments, and long-term service agreements.
Sources of Capital
Southern Power may use external funds, equity capital from Southern Company, or internally
generated cash from operations to finance any new projects and ongoing capital requirements.
Southern Power expects to generate external funds from the issuance of unsecured senior debt and
commercial paper or utilization of credit arrangements from banks. See MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND
ANALYSIS FINANCIAL CONDITION AND LIQUIDITY Sources of Capital of Southern Power in Item 7 of
the Form 10-K for additional information.
112
SOUTHERN
POWER COMPANY
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
At June 30, 2005, Southern Powers current liabilities exceeded current assets due to the
issuance of commercial paper and the use of internal cash to finance the Oleander acquisition. To
meet liquidity and capital resource requirements, in June 2005 Southern Power entered into a new
$400 million committed credit facility with banks expiring in 2010. This new arrangement replaces
Southern Powers previous $325 million unsecured syndicated credit arrangement. The new
arrangement eliminates all cross defaults and Southern Company guarantee terms and conditions that
existed in the previous arrangement. The new $400 million revolving credit facility does include
two financial covenants, a 65% debt to capitalization test and an 80% contract coverage test.
Proceeds from borrowings under this arrangement may be used for working capital and
general corporate purposes. This arrangement also provides liquidity support for Southern Powers
commercial paper program. At June 30, 2005, Southern Power had no outstanding borrowings under its
new credit facility.
At June 30, 2005, Southern Power had approximately $163.1 million of commercial paper
outstanding. Amounts drawn under the commercial paper program may be used to finance acquisition
and construction costs related to electric generating facilities and for general corporate
purposes.
Credit Rating Risk
Southern Power does not have any credit arrangements that would require material changes in payment
schedules or terminations as a result of a credit rating downgrade. There are certain contracts
that could require collateral, but not accelerated payment, in the event of a credit rating change
to BBB- or Baa3 or below. Generally, collateral may be provided with a Southern Company guaranty,
letter of credit, or cash. These contracts are primarily for physical electricity purchases and
sales. At June 30, 2005, the maximum potential collateral requirements at a BBB- or Baa3 rating
were approximately $44 million. The maximum potential collateral requirements at a rating below
BBB- or Baa3 were approximately $107 million. In addition, through the acquisition of Oleander,
Southern Power assumed a PPA with Seminole Electric Cooperative, Inc. that could require
collateral, but not accelerated payment, in the event of a credit rating change to BBB- or Baa3 or
below for an amount which currently cannot be determined. Southern Power is also party to certain
derivative agreements that could require collateral and/or accelerated payment in the event of a
credit rating change to below investment grade. These agreements are primarily for natural gas
price risk management activities. At June 30, 2005, Southern Power had no material exposure related
to these agreements.
Market Price Risk
Southern Powers market risk exposures relative to interest rate changes have not changed
materially compared with the December 31, 2004 reporting period. In addition, Southern Power is
not aware of any facts or circumstances that would significantly affect such exposures in the near
term.
Because energy from Southern Powers generating facilities is primarily sold under long-term
PPAs with tolling agreements and provisions shifting substantially all of the responsibility for
fuel cost to the purchasers, Southern Powers exposure to market volatility in commodity fuel
prices and prices of electricity is limited. To mitigate residual risks in those areas, Southern
Power enters into fixed-price contracts for the sale of electricity. Any unrealized gains and
losses on electric and gas contracts qualifying as cash flow hedges of anticipated purchases and
sales are deferred in Other Comprehensive Income. The fair value of derivative energy contracts at
June 30, 2005 was immaterial.
For
additional information, see MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
LIQUIDITY Market Price Risk of Southern Power in Item 7 and Notes 1 and 5 to the financial
statements of Southern Power under Financial Instruments in Item 8 of the Form 10-K and Note (F)
to the Condensed Financial Statements herein.
113
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR
THE SOUTHERN COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
ALABAMA POWER COMPANY
GEORGIA POWER COMPANY
GULF POWER COMPANY
MISSISSIPPI POWER COMPANY
SAVANNAH ELECTRIC AND POWER COMPANY
SOUTHERN POWER COMPANY
INDEX TO APPLICABLE NOTES TO
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS BY REGISTRANT
|
|
|
Registrant |
|
Applicable Notes |
Southern Company
|
|
A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, I, J, K, P, Q, R |
|
|
|
Alabama Power
|
|
A, B, C, D, F, G, H, I |
|
|
|
Georgia Power
|
|
A, B, C, D, F, G, J |
|
|
|
Gulf Power
|
|
A, B, C, D, F, G, K |
|
|
|
Mississippi Power
|
|
A, B, C, D, F, G, L |
|
|
|
Savannah Electric
|
|
A, B, C, D, F, G, H, M, N |
|
|
|
Southern Power
|
|
A, B, F, O |
114
THE
SOUTHERN COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
ALABAMA POWER COMPANY
GEORGIA POWER COMPANY
GULF POWER COMPANY
MISSISSIPPI POWER COMPANY
SAVANNAH ELECTRIC AND POWER COMPANY
SOUTHERN POWER COMPANY
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS:
|
(A) |
|
The condensed financial statements of the registrants included herein have been
prepared by each registrant, without audit, pursuant to the rules and regulations of the
SEC. In the opinion of each registrants management, the information regarding such
registrant furnished herein reflects all adjustments necessary to present fairly the
results of operations for the periods ended June 30, 2005 and 2004. Certain information
and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance
with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States have been condensed or
omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations, although each registrant believes that the
disclosures regarding such registrant are adequate to make the information presented not
misleading. Disclosure which would substantially duplicate the disclosure in the Form 10-K
and details which have not changed significantly in amount or composition since the filing
of the Form 10-K are omitted from this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Therefore, these
condensed financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements
and the notes thereto included in the Form 10-K. Certain prior period amounts have been
reclassified to conform to current period presentation. Due to seasonal variations in the
demand for energy, operating results for the periods presented do not necessarily indicate
operating results for the entire year. |
|
|
(B) |
|
See Note 3 to the financial statements of Southern Company and the retail operating
companies and Note 2 to the financial statements of Southern Power in Item 8 of the Form
10-K for information relating to various lawsuits and other contingencies. |
|
|
|
|
NEW SOURCE REVIEW ACTIONS |
|
|
|
|
See Note 3 to the financial statements of Southern Company
and Alabama Power under Environmental Matters New Source Review Actions and Georgia Power, Gulf Power and
Savannah Electric under New Source Review Actions in Item 8 of the Form 10-K. On June 3,
2005, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Alabama issued its decision in
favor of Alabama Power on the two primary legal issues in the case: (1) the scope of the
routine maintenance repair and replacement exclusion under the New Source Review rules and
(2) the proper test for calculating emissions increases under those rules. The court
decided that routine maintenance repair and replacement must be defined with reference to
what is routine in the industry as opposed to what is routine at an individual unit and
emissions increases must be measured against the maximum hourly emission rate. The decision
does not resolve the case, nor does it address other legal issues associated with the EPAs
allegations involving Plant Miller Units 3 and 4. In separate orders, the court dismissed
Alabama Powers motion for summary judgment on the claims, stayed the entire case, and
referred the parties to mediation to be completed by September 9, 2005. Alabama Power may
refile its motion for summary judgment if the mediation proves unsuccessful. The Georgia
Power and Savannah Electric case, which is pending in federal district court in Georgia,
remains administratively closed. The ultimate outcome of these matters cannot now be
determined. |
115
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS: (Continued)
|
|
|
PLANT WANSLEY ENVIRONMENTAL LITIGATION |
|
|
|
|
See Note 3 to the financial statements of Southern Company under Environmental Matters -
Plant Wansley Environmental Litigation and Georgia Power under Plant Wansley Environmental
Litigation in Item 8 of the Form 10-K. On March 11, 2005, the U.S. Circuit Court of
Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit accepted Georgia Powers petition for review of the U.S.
District Court for the Northern District of Georgias December 15, 2004 order related to the
Plant Wansley environmental litigation. Oral argument on that appeal has not been
scheduled. The final outcome of this matter cannot now be determined. |
|
|
|
|
MIRANT RELATED MATTERS |
|
|
|
|
See Note 3 to the financial statements of Southern Company
under Mirant Related Matters
Mirant Bankruptcy in Item 8 of the Form 10-K for information regarding Southern Companys
contingent liabilities associated with Mirant, including guarantees of contractual
commitments, litigation, and joint and several liabilities in connection with the
consolidated federal income tax return. |
In July 2003, Mirant filed for voluntary reorganization under Chapter 11 of the U.S.
Bankruptcy Code. In June 2004, Mirants bankruptcy counsel notified Southern Company that
it was investigating, on behalf of a committee of independent Mirant directors, potential
claims against Southern Company.
In June 2005, Mirant, as a debtor in possession, and The Official Committee of
Unsecured Creditors of Mirant Corporation filed a complaint against Southern Company in the
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Texas and filed an amended complaint on
July 6, 2005. The complaint alleges that Southern Company caused Mirant to engage
in certain fraudulent transfers and to pay illegal dividends to Southern Company in 1999 and
2000 with actual intent to hinder, delay, or defraud creditors or, alternatively, when
Southern Company knew or should have known that Mirant was allegedly insolvent,
undercapitalized or unable to pay its debts. The alleged fraudulent transfers and/or
illegal dividends include: (1) certain dividends from Mirant to Southern Company in the
aggregate amount of $668 million, (2) the repayment of certain intercompany loans and
accrued interest in an aggregate amount of $1.035 billion, and (3) the dividend distribution
of one share of Series B Preferred Stock and its subsequent redemption in exchange for
Mirants 80% interest in a holding company that owned SE Finance Capital Corporation and
Southern Company Capital Funding, Inc., which transfer Mirant asserts is valued at $247.9
million. The complaint also seeks to recharacterize certain advances from Southern Company
to Mirant for investments in energy facilities from debt to equity. The complaint further
alleges that Southern Company is liable to Mirants creditors for the full amount of
Mirants liability under an alter ego theory of liability and that Southern Company caused
Mirant to breach its fiduciary duty of loyalty to its creditors. The complaint seeks
monetary damages in excess of $2 billion plus interest, punitive damages, attorneys fees,
and costs. Finally, Mirant objects to Southern Companys claims against Mirant in the
Bankruptcy Court (which, in the aggregate, currently total approximately $70 million) and
seeks equitable subordination of Southern Companys claims to the claims of all other
creditors. Southern Company believes there is no meritorious basis for Mirants claims and
intends to vigorously defend itself in this action.
On July 13, 2005, The Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of Mirant Corporation,
on behalf of Mirant, as a debtor in possession, and its creditors, filed a complaint in the
Bankruptcy Court against certain former officers and directors of Mirant and/or Southern
Company. The complaint alleges that the defendants breached their fiduciary duties of
loyalty and care owed to Mirant and its creditors by allowing Mirant to overpay for certain
acquisitions of utility assets in 1997, 1998, and 1999, and by authorizing or participating
in the transfers described above from Mirant to Southern Company in 1999
and 2000 when Mirant was allegedly insolvent, undercapitalized, or unable to pay its debts.
Specifically, the complaint alleges that the defendants lacked independence in judgment and
failed to act in the best
116
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS: (Continued)
interest of Mirant and its creditors when they authorized or
participated in these acquisitions and transfers. The complaint seeks to recover damages in
excess of $1.9 billion for the transfers in 1999 and 2000. Under certain circumstances,
Southern Company may be obligated under its Bylaws to indemnify the individuals named as
defendants in the complaint.
The ultimate outcome of these matters cannot be determined at this time.
|
|
|
RACE DISCRIMINATION LITIGATION |
|
|
|
|
See Note 3 to the financial statements of Southern Company and Georgia Power under Race
Discrimination Litigation in Item 8 of the Form 10-K. On April 15, 2005, the U.S. Court of
Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied the plaintiffs petition for rehearing by the entire
Eleventh Circuit panel of judges. On July 13, 2005, the plaintiffs filed a petition for
writ of certiorari to the U.S. Supreme Court, asking the Court to review several adverse
rulings made by the trial court and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit.
Georgia Power will file an opposition brief shortly. The final outcome of this matter
cannot now be determined. |
|
|
|
|
FERC MATTERS |
|
|
|
|
See Note 3 to the financial statements of Southern Company, Alabama Power, Georgia Power,
Gulf Power, Mississippi Power, and Savannah Electric under Market-Based Rate Authority and
Note 2 to the financial statements of Southern Power under FERC Matters Market-Based Rate
Authority in Item 8 of the Form 10-K for information on the FERCs April 2004 order
adopting a new interim analysis for measuring generation market power and a proceeding
initiated by the FERC in December 2004 to assess Southern Companys generation dominance
within its retail service territory. Each of the retail operating companies and Southern
Power has authorization from the FERC to sell power to non-affiliates at market-based
prices. Through SCS, as agent, the retail operating companies and Southern Power also have
FERC authority to make short-term opportunity sales at market rates. Specific FERC approval
must be obtained with respect to a market-based contract with an affiliate. On February 15,
2005, Southern Company submitted additional information related to generation dominance in
its retail service territory. On July 8, 2005, the FERC initiated a hearing before an
administrative law judge to review the generation market power issues. Any new market-based
rate transactions in Southern Companys retail service territory entered into after February
27, 2005 will be subject to refund to the level of the default cost-based rates, pending the
outcome of the proceeding. In the event that the FERCs default mitigation measures are
ultimately applied, Southern Power and the retail operating companies may be required to
charge cost-based rates for certain wholesale sales in the Southern Company retail service
territory, which may be lower than negotiated market-based rates. The impact of such sales
through June 30, 2005 is not material to the net income of Southern Company, any of the
retail operating companies, or Southern Power. The final outcome of this matter will depend
on the form in which the final methodology for assessing generation market power and
mitigation rules may be ultimately adopted and cannot be determined at this time. |
In addition, on May 5, 2005, the FERC issued an order expanding the generation market
power proceeding initiated in December 2004 to include an investigation of whether Southern
Company satisfies the other three parts of the FERCs market-based rate analysis:
transmission market power, barriers to entry, and affiliate abuse or reciprocal dealing.
The FERC established a new refund period related to this expanded investigation. Any and
all new market-based rate transactions involving any Southern Company subsidiary will be
subject to refund to the extent the FERC orders lower rates beginning July 19, 2005. The
FERC also directed that this expanded proceeding be held in abeyance pending the outcome of
the proceeding on the IIC discussed below.
117
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS: (Continued)
Also on May 5, 2005, the FERC initiated a new proceeding to examine (1) the provisions
of the IIC among Alabama Power, Georgia Power, Gulf Power, Mississippi Power, Savannah
Electric, Southern Power, and SCS, as agent, under the terms of which the power pool of
Southern Company is operated, and, in particular, the propriety of the continued inclusion
of Southern Power as a party to the IIC, (2) whether any parties to the IIC have violated
the FERCs standards of conduct applicable to utility companies that are transmission
providers, and (3) whether Southern Companys code of conduct defining Southern Power as a
system company rather than a marketing affiliate is just and reasonable. In 2000, in
connection with the formation of Southern Power, the FERC authorized
Southern Powers inclusion in the
IIC. The FERC also previously approved Southern Companys code of conduct. The FERC order
directs that the administrative law judge who presided over the McIntosh PPA proceeding be
assigned to preside over the hearing in this proceeding and that the testimony and exhibits
presented in that proceeding be preserved to the extent appropriate. See Note 3 to the
financial statements of Southern Company, Georgia Power and Savannah Electric and Note 2 to
the financial statements of Southern Power under Plant McIntosh Construction Project in
Item 8 of the Form 10-K for information on the McIntosh PPA proceeding. Effective July 19,
2005, revenues from transactions under the IIC involving any Southern Company subsidiaries
will be subject to refund to the extent the FERC orders any changes to the IIC.
Southern Company and its subsidiaries believe that there is no meritorious basis for
these allegations and intend to vigorously defend themselves in the proceedings. However,
the final outcome of these matters, including any remedies to be applied in the event of an
adverse ruling in these proceedings, cannot now be determined.
|
|
|
INCOME TAX MATTERS |
|
|
|
|
See Note 3 to the financial statements of Southern Company under Income Tax Matters
Leveraged Lease Transactions in Item 8 of the Form 10-K for information related to Southern
Companys deductions related to three international lease transactions (so-called SILO or
sale-in-lease-out transactions), which the IRS challenged in connection with its audit of
Southern Companys 2000 and 2001 tax returns. If the IRS is ultimately successful in
disallowing the tax deductions related to these transactions beginning with the 2000 tax
year, Southern Company could be subject to additional interest charges of up to $25 million.
In addition, the IRS has proposed a penalty of approximately $16 million. Additionally,
although the payment of the tax liability, exclusive of interest and any penalties, would
not affect Southern Companys results of operations under current accounting standards, it
could have a material impact on cash flow. See Note 1 to the financial statements of
Southern Company under Leveraged Leases in Item 8 of the Form 10-K for additional details
of the deferred taxes related to these transactions. Furthermore, the FASB has recently
proposed changes to the accounting for both leveraged leases and uncertain tax positions.
If approved as proposed, these changes could require Southern Company to reflect the tax
deductions that the IRS is challenging as currently payable on the balance sheet and to
change the timing of the income recognized under the leases, including a cumulative effect
upon adoption of this change that could be significant, and potentially material, to
Southern Companys net income. Southern Company believes these transactions are valid
leases for U.S. tax purposes, the related deductions are allowable, and the assessment of a
penalty is inappropriate. Southern Company is continuing to pursue resolution of these
matters with the IRS; however, the ultimate outcome of these matters cannot now be
determined. |
|
|
(C) |
|
See Note 1 to the financial statements of Southern Company and the retail operating
companies under Stock Options and Note 8 to the financial statements of Southern Company
and the retail operating companies under Stock Option Plan in Item 8 of the Form 10-K for
information regarding non-qualified employee stock options provided by Southern Company.
Southern Company accounts for options granted in accordance with Accounting Principles
Board Opinion No. 25; thus, no compensation expense is recognized because the exercise
price of all options granted equaled the fair market value on |
118
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS: (Continued)
|
|
|
the date of the grant. The estimated fair values of stock options granted during the
three-month and six-month periods ending June 30, 2005 and 2004 have been derived using the
Black-Scholes stock option pricing model. |
|
|
|
|
The following table shows the assumptions and the weighted average fair values of these
stock options: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six |
|
Months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Months |
|
Ended |
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Ended |
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, 2005 |
|
June 30, 2004 |
|
June 30, 2005 |
|
2004 |
Interest rate |
|
|
3.8 |
% |
|
|
3.7 |
% |
|
|
3.9 |
% |
|
|
3.1 |
% |
Average expected life of stock
options (in years) |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
Expected volatility of common stock |
|
|
17.7 |
% |
|
|
19.6 |
% |
|
|
17.9 |
% |
|
|
19.7 |
% |
Expected annual dividends on
common stock |
|
$ |
1.49 |
|
|
$ |
1.40 |
|
|
$ |
1.43 |
|
|
$ |
1.40 |
|
Weighted average fair value of
stock options
granted |
|
$ |
3.78 |
|
|
$ |
3.41 |
|
|
$ |
3.90 |
|
|
$ |
3.29 |
|
The pro forma impact of fair-value accounting for options granted on Southern Companys
consolidated earnings per share is as follows: (in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, 2005 |
|
June 30, 2004 |
|
|
As Reported |
|
Pro Forma |
|
As Reported |
|
Pro Forma |
Earnings per share (dollars): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
0.52 |
|
|
$ |
0.51 |
|
|
$ |
0.48 |
|
|
$ |
0.47 |
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.52 |
|
|
$ |
0.51 |
|
|
$ |
0.47 |
|
|
$ |
0.46 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, 2005 |
|
June 30, 2004 |
|
|
As Reported |
|
Pro Forma |
|
As Reported |
|
Pro Forma |
Earnings per share (dollars): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
0.95 |
|
|
$ |
0.93 |
|
|
$ |
0.93 |
|
|
$ |
0.91 |
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.95 |
|
|
$ |
0.93 |
|
|
$ |
0.92 |
|
|
$ |
0.90 |
|
119
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS: (Continued)
The pro forma impact of fair-value accounting for options granted on net income after
dividends on preferred stock is as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, 2005 |
|
June 30, 2004 |
|
|
As Reported |
|
Pro Forma |
|
As Reported |
|
Pro Forma |
Net income after
dividends on
preferred stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alabama Power |
|
$ |
121 |
|
|
$ |
121 |
|
|
$ |
104 |
|
|
$ |
104 |
|
Georgia Power |
|
|
158 |
|
|
|
157 |
|
|
|
156 |
|
|
|
155 |
|
Gulf Power |
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
Mississippi Power |
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
Savannah Electric |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Southern Company |
|
$ |
387 |
|
|
$ |
385 |
|
|
$ |
352 |
|
|
$ |
350 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, 2005 |
|
June 30, 2004 |
|
|
As Reported |
|
Pro Forma |
|
As Reported |
|
Pro Forma |
Net income after
dividends on
preferred stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alabama Power |
|
$ |
215 |
|
|
$ |
213 |
|
|
$ |
195 |
|
|
$ |
193 |
|
Georgia Power |
|
|
300 |
|
|
|
297 |
|
|
|
300 |
|
|
|
297 |
|
Gulf Power |
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
Mississippi Power |
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
Savannah Electric |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Southern Company |
|
$ |
710 |
|
|
$ |
696 |
|
|
$ |
683 |
|
|
$ |
671 |
|
|
(D) |
|
See Note 1 to the financial statements of Southern Company, Alabama Power, Georgia
Power, Gulf Power, Mississippi Power, and Savannah Electric under Asset Retirement
Obligations and Other Costs of Removal in Item 8 of the Form 10-K. The following table
reflects the details of the asset retirement obligations included in the Condensed Balance
Sheets (in millions). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at |
|
Liabilities |
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flow |
|
Balance at |
|
|
12/31/04 |
|
Incurred |
|
Settled |
|
Accretion |
|
Revisions |
|
6/30/05 |
Alabama Power |
|
$ |
383.6 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
13.0 |
|
|
$ |
(0.4 |
) |
|
$ |
396.2 |
|
Georgia Power |
|
|
504.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.6 |
) |
|
|
16.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
520.3 |
|
Gulf Power |
|
|
5.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
Mississippi Power |
|
|
5.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.7 |
|
Savannah Electric |
|
|
3.9 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Southern Company |
|
$ |
903.3 |
|
|
$ |
0.5 |
|
|
$ |
(0.9 |
) |
|
$ |
29.9 |
|
|
$ |
(0.4 |
) |
|
$ |
932.4 |
|
120
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS: (Continued)
|
(E) |
|
For Southern Company, the only difference in computing basic and diluted earnings per
share is attributable to outstanding options under the stock option plan. See Note 8 to
the financial statements of Southern Company in Item 8 of the Form 10-K for further
information on the stock option plan. The effect of the stock options was determined
using the treasury stock method. Shares used to compute diluted earnings per share are as
follows (in thousands): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
Three Months |
|
Six Months |
|
Six Months |
|
|
Ended |
|
Ended |
|
Ended |
|
Ended |
|
|
June 30, 2005 |
|
June 30, 2004 |
|
June 30, 2005 |
|
June 30, 2004 |
|
As reported shares |
|
|
746,823 |
|
|
|
738,185 |
|
|
|
745,424 |
|
|
|
737,412 |
|
Effect of options |
|
|
4,193 |
|
|
|
4,268 |
|
|
|
3,936 |
|
|
|
4,508 |
|
Diluted shares |
|
|
751,016 |
|
|
|
742,453 |
|
|
|
749,360 |
|
|
|
741,920 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(F) |
|
See Note 6 to the financial statements of Southern Company, Alabama Power, Georgia
Power, Gulf Power, Mississippi Power, and Savannah Electric under Financial Instruments
in Item 8 of the Form 10-K. At June 30, 2005, the fair value of derivative energy
contracts was reflected in the financial statements as follows (in millions): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Southern |
|
Alabama |
|
Georgia |
|
Gulf |
|
Mississippi |
|
Savannah |
|
|
Company |
|
Power |
|
Power |
|
Power |
|
Power |
|
Electric |
|
|
|
Amounts |
Regulatory liabilities, net |
|
$ |
64.8 |
|
|
$ |
19.3 |
|
|
$ |
18.9 |
|
|
$ |
6.7 |
|
|
$ |
14.8 |
|
|
$ |
5.2 |
|
Other comprehensive income
(loss) |
|
|
(0.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fair value |
|
$ |
64.0 |
|
|
$ |
19.3 |
|
|
$ |
18.9 |
|
|
$ |
6.7 |
|
|
$ |
14.0 |
|
|
$ |
5.2 |
|
|
For the three months and six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004, the amounts
recognized in income for derivative energy contracts that are not hedges, as well as the
amounts expected to be reclassified from other comprehensive income to fuel expense for the
twelve month period ending June 30, 2006 were immaterial for each registrant. Additionally,
no material ineffectiveness has been recorded in net income for the three months and six
months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004.
In April 2005, Southern Company entered into a purchased option with an initial fair
value of approximately $7 million to reduce its exposure to a potential phase-out of certain
income tax credits in 2005. In accordance with Section 29 of the IRC, these tax credits are
subject to limitation as the annual average price of oil increases. At June 30, 2005 the
fair value of the option was approximately $6 million. For the three months and six months
ended June 30, 2005, the expense recognized in income to mark the option to market was $1
million.
121
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS: (Continued)
At June 30, 2005, Southern Company had $3.1 billion notional amount of interest rate
derivatives outstanding with net fair value losses of $5.0 million as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Gain |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hedge |
|
(Loss) |
|
|
Notional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maturity |
|
June 30, 2005 |
|
|
Amount |
|
Fixed Rate Received |
|
Variable Rate Paid |
|
Date |
|
(in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6-month LIBOR |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in arrears) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Southern Company |
|
$400 million |
|
|
5.30 |
% |
|
less 0.103% |
|
February 2007 |
|
$ |
10.8 |
|
|
Southern Company |
|
$40 million |
|
|
7.625 |
% |
|
6-month LIBOR |
|
December 2009 |
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in arrears) plus |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.9225 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average |
|
Hedge |
|
Gain (Loss) |
|
|
Notional |
|
Variable Rate |
|
Fixed Rate |
|
Maturity |
|
June 30, 2005 |
|
|
Amount |
|
Received |
|
Paid |
|
Date |
|
(in millions) |
|
Alabama Power |
|
$536 million |
|
BMA Index |
|
|
2.007 |
% |
|
January 2007 |
|
$ |
6.5 |
|
Alabama Power |
|
$195 million |
|
3-month LIBOR |
|
|
1.89 |
% |
|
April 2006 |
|
|
3.4 |
|
Alabama Power |
|
$300 million |
|
3-month LIBOR |
|
|
4.798 |
% |
|
December 2015 |
|
|
(9.8 |
) |
Alabama Power |
|
$300 million |
|
3-month LIBOR |
|
|
4.418 |
% |
|
February 2016 |
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
Georgia Power |
|
$100 million |
|
3-month LIBOR |
|
|
5.029 |
% |
|
December 2015 |
|
|
(5.1 |
) |
Georgia Power* |
|
$150 million |
|
3-month LIBOR |
|
|
4.133 6.00 |
% |
|
February 2016 |
|
|
(1.3 |
) |
Georgia Power** |
|
$400 million |
|
Floating |
|
|
2.35 3.85 |
% |
|
December 2007 |
|
|
0.6 |
|
Georgia Power |
|
$300 million |
|
3-month LIBOR |
|
|
4.58 5.75 |
% |
|
July 2037 |
|
|
(10.0 |
) |
Georgia Power |
|
$300 million |
|
1-month LIBOR |
|
|
2.6745 |
% |
|
June 2007 |
|
|
0.2 |
|
Savannah Electric |
|
$ 14 million |
|
BMA Index |
|
|
2.502 |
% |
|
December 2007 |
|
|
0.1 |
|
Savannah Electric |
|
$ 30 million |
|
3-month LIBOR |
|
|
4.686 |
% |
|
May 2016 |
|
|
(0.6 |
) |
|
|
|
* |
|
Interest rate collar |
|
** |
|
Series of interest rate caps and collars with variable rate based on one-month LIBOR |
122
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS: (Continued)
|
|
|
For the twelve month period ended June 30, 2006, the following table reflects the
estimated pre-tax gains/(losses) that will be reclassified from Accumulated Other
Comprehensive Income to Interest Expense. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
Alabama Power |
|
$ |
4.8 |
|
Georgia Power |
|
|
(2.1 |
) |
Gulf Power |
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
Savannah Electric |
|
|
|
|
Southern Power |
|
|
(11.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Southern Company |
|
$ |
(9.1 |
) |
|
(G) |
|
See Note 2 to the financial statements of Southern Company, Alabama Power, Georgia
Power, Gulf Power, Mississippi Power, and Savannah Electric in Item 8 of the Form 10-K.
Components of the pension plans and postretirement plans net periodic costs for the
three-month and six-month periods ending June 30, 2005 and 2004 are as follows (in
millions): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Southern |
|
Alabama |
|
Georgia |
|
|
|
|
|
Mississippi |
|
Savannah |
PENSION PLANS |
|
Company |
|
Power |
|
Power |
|
Gulf Power |
|
Power |
|
Electric |
|
Three Months Ended
June 30, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service cost |
|
$ |
35 |
|
|
$ |
8 |
|
|
$ |
11 |
|
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
Interest cost |
|
|
72 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Expected return on plan assets |
|
|
(116 |
) |
|
|
(35 |
) |
|
|
(46 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
Recognized net (gain)/loss |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net amortization |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cost (income) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(5 |
) |
|
$ |
(5 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
June 30, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service cost |
|
$ |
71 |
|
|
$ |
17 |
|
|
$ |
23 |
|
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
$ |
2 |
|
Interest cost |
|
|
143 |
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
Expected return on plan assets |
|
|
(231 |
) |
|
|
(70 |
) |
|
|
(92 |
) |
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
Recognized net (gain)/loss |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net amortization |
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cost (income) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(11 |
) |
|
$ |
(11 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
June 30, 2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service cost |
|
$ |
32 |
|
|
$ |
8 |
|
|
$ |
10 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
Interest cost |
|
|
68 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Expected return on plan assets |
|
|
(113 |
) |
|
|
(35 |
) |
|
|
(45 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
Recognized net (gain)/loss |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net amortization |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cost (income) |
|
$ |
(10 |
) |
|
$ |
(9 |
) |
|
$ |
(8 |
) |
|
$ |
(1 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
June 30, 2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service cost |
|
$ |
64 |
|
|
$ |
16 |
|
|
$ |
20 |
|
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
$ |
2 |
|
Interest cost |
|
|
136 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Expected return on plan assets |
|
|
(226 |
) |
|
|
(70 |
) |
|
|
(90 |
) |
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
Recognized net (gain)/loss |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net amortization |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cost (income) |
|
$ |
(20 |
) |
|
$ |
(18 |
) |
|
$ |
(16 |
) |
|
$ |
(2 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2 |
|
123
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS: (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
POSTRETIREMENT PLANS |
|
Southern |
|
Alabama |
|
Georgia |
|
Gulf |
|
Mississippi |
|
Savannah |
|
|
Company |
|
Power |
|
Power |
|
Power |
|
Power |
|
Electric |
|
Three Months Ended
June 30, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service cost |
|
$ |
7 |
|
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Interest cost |
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Expected return on plan assets |
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net amortization |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cost (income) |
|
$ |
30 |
|
|
$ |
8 |
|
|
$ |
12 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
June 30, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service cost |
|
$ |
14 |
|
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
$ |
5 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Interest cost |
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Expected return on plan assets |
|
|
(22 |
) |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net amortization |
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Net cost (income) |
|
$ |
59 |
|
|
$ |
14 |
|
|
$ |
24 |
|
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
June 30, 2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service cost |
|
$ |
7 |
|
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Interest cost |
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Expected return on plan assets |
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net amortization |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cost (income) |
|
$ |
28 |
|
|
$ |
6 |
|
|
$ |
12 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
June 30, 2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service cost |
|
$ |
14 |
|
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Interest cost |
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Expected return on plan assets |
|
|
(24 |
) |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net amortization |
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cost (income) |
|
$ |
56 |
|
|
$ |
12 |
|
|
$ |
24 |
|
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
(H) |
|
See Note 5 to the financial statements of Southern Company, Alabama Power, and
Savannah Electric in Item 8 of the Form 10-K for information on each companys effective
income tax rate. In accordance with an Alabama PSC-approved accounting order to restore
the natural disaster reserve, Alabama Power recorded a reduction in its income tax
expense of approximately $27.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005. In
addition, in connection with construction on the Plant McIntosh combined cycle units,
Savannah Electric recorded an increase of approximately $0.5 million and
$1.6 million in AFUDC equity, which is not taxable, for the three months and six months
ended June 30, 2005, respectively. The impact of these entries caused a significant
reduction in the effective income tax rate for the six months ended June 30, 2005 for
each of Southern Company, Alabama Power, and Savannah Electric. On an annual basis, the
effective income tax rate for 2005 is expected to be approximately 27% for Southern
Company, 35% for Alabama Power, and 35% for Savannah Electric. For additional
information on Alabama Powers accounting order, see Note 3 to the financial statements
of Southern Company and Alabama Power under Gulf Power and Alabama Power Storm Damage
Recovery and Natural Disaster Cost Recovery, respectively, in Item 8 of the Form 10-K.
For additional information on the Plant McIntosh construction, see Note 3 to the
financial statements of Southern Company and Savannah Electric under Plant McIntosh
Construction Project in Item 8 of the Form 10-K. |
124
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS: (Continued)
|
(I) |
|
Alabama Power fuel costs are recovered under Rate ECR (Energy Cost Recovery), which
provides for the addition of a fuel and energy cost factor to base rates. In April 2005,
this factor was increased from 1.518 cents per kilowatt-hour to 1.788 cents per
kilowatt-hour, which should result in a 4.5% increase in annual retail revenues, or
approximately $148 million. Alabama Power will continue to monitor the under recovered
fuel cost balance to determine if an additional adjustment to billing rates should be
requested from the Alabama PSC. Alabama Powers under recovered fuel costs as of June 30,
2005 totaled $127.4 million. See Note 3 to the financial statements of Southern Company
and Alabama Power under Alabama Power Retail Regulatory Matters and Retail Regulatory
Matters, respectively, in Item 8 of the Form 10-K for additional information. |
See Note 1 to the financial statements of Southern Company and Alabama Power under
Nuclear Decommissioning in Item 8 of the Form 10-K for information on Alabama Powers
external nuclear decommissioning trust funds (NDT). On May 12, 2005, Alabama Power received
notice from the NRC renewing the licenses on both reactor units at Plant Farley for an
additional 20 years. As a result of the license extension, amounts previously contributed
to the NDT are currently projected to be adequate to meet the decommissioning obligations.
Therefore, on June 23, 2005, the Alabama PSC approved Alabama Powers request to suspend,
effective January 1, 2005, the inclusion in its annual cost of service of $18 million in
decommissioning costs and to also suspend the associated obligation to make semi-annual
contributions to the NDT. Alabama Power will continue to provide site specific estimates of
the decommissioning costs and related projections of funds in the NDT to the Alabama PSC
and, if necessary, would seek the Alabama PSCs approval to address any changes in a manner
consistent with NRC and other applicable requirements. The approved suspension would not
affect the transfer of internal reserves (less than $1 million annually) previously
collected from customers prior to the establishment of the NDT over the remaining life of
the licenses.
On July 10, 2005, Hurricane Dennis impacted the Gulf Coast of Alabama and continued
north through the state of Alabama, causing significant damage in parts of the service
territory of Alabama Power. Approximately 241,000 of Alabama Powers 1,390,000 customer
accounts were without electrical service immediately after the hurricane. See Note 1 to the
financial statements of Alabama Power under Natural Disaster Reserve in Item 8 of the Form
10-K for information on how Alabama Power maintains a reserve to cover uninsured expenses
resulting from storms. The total operation and maintenance costs associated with repairing
the damage to facilities and restoring service to customers are preliminarily estimated to
be $30 million. The June 30, 2005 balance of $4.2 million in the natural disaster reserve
is not sufficient to cover these costs. Alabama Power has requested clarification from the
Alabama PSC concerning an October 2004 order that allows the natural disaster reserve to
carry a negative balance and to defer such costs for recovery in future periods to be
determined by the Alabama PSC. If this request is not approved, Alabama Power would be
required to expense the costs in excess of the reserve balance in the third quarter of 2005.
On July 28, 2005, Alabama Power filed two applications with the FERC for a new 50-year
license for the Alabama Powers seven hydroelectric developments on the Coosa River (Weiss,
Henry, Logan Martin, Lay, Mitchell, Jordan, and Bouldin) and a new 50-year license for the
Lewis Smith and Bankhead developments on the Warrior River. The FERC licenses for all of
these nine projects expire in 2007. Upon or after the expiration of each license, the
United States Government, by act of Congress, may take over the project or the FERC may
relicense the project either to the original licensee or to a new licensee. The FERC may
grant relicenses subject to certain requirements that could result in additional costs to
Alabama Power. The final outcome of this matter cannot be determined at this time.
|
(J) |
|
On May 17, 2005, the Georgia PSC voted to allow Georgia Power to increase customer
fuel rates to recover estimated under-recovered fuel costs of approximately $508 million as
of May 31, 2005 over the period from June 1, 2005 through May 31, 2009, as well as future
projected fuel costs based on a June 2005 through May 2006 test period. The new fuel rate
became effective June 1, 2005 and represents an |
125
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS: (Continued)
|
|
|
average annual increase in revenues of approximately 9.5%, or approximately $473 million.
Based on the order, a portion of the under-recovered regulatory clause revenues was
reclassified from current assets to deferred charges and other assets on the balance sheet. |
|
|
(K) |
|
See Note 3 to the financial statements of Southern Company and Gulf Power under Gulf
Power and Alabama Power Storm Damage Recovery and Retail Regulatory Matters,
respectively, in Item 8 of the Form 10-K for information on a Stipulation and Settlement
filed with the Florida PSC to resolve all matters regarding the effects of Hurricane Ivan
on Gulf Powers reserve for property damage. The Florida PSC approved the Stipulation and
Settlement as filed in March 2005 and Gulf Power began billing customers accordingly in
April 2005. In connection with the Stipulation, Gulf Power has agreed that it will not
seek any additional increase in its base rates and charges to become effective on or before
March 1, 2007. |
On July 10, 2005, Hurricane Dennis impacted the Gulf Coast of Florida causing
substantial damage in Gulf Powers service territory. Approximately 242,000 of Gulf Powers
405,000 customer accounts were without electrical service immediately after the hurricane
struck. See Note 1 to the financial statements of Gulf Power under Provision for Property
Damage in Item 8 of the Form 10-K for information on Gulf Powers accrual to cover the cost
of damages to its transmission and distribution lines from major storms and the cost of
uninsured damages to its generation facilities and other property. Due to the damages
incurred last year related to Hurricane Ivan, the accumulated reserve had a deficit balance
of $42 million at June 30, 2005. The current preliminary estimate of Hurricane Dennis
restoration costs are approximately $60 million. The established policy of the Florida PSC,
as recently reaffirmed by its decisions following the 2004 hurricane experience of Floridas
investor owned electric utilities, provides for recovery of these costs through the
mechanism of the property insurance reserve and, where necessary, through a special recovery
surcharge. In 2005, the Florida legislature authorized securitized financing as an
additional mechanism available to the Florida PSC and electric utilities in Florida for
addressing the extraordinary costs associated with hurricanes. Based upon the
additional costs related to Hurricane Dennis, this option, along with other alternatives, is
being evaluated.
|
(L) |
|
On June 30, 2005, Mississippi Power issued $30 million of Series G 5.40% Senior Notes
due July 1, 2035. The proceeds were used to purchase Treasury securities for the legal
defeasance of $30 million principal amount of its First Mortgage Bonds, 6 7/8% Series. An
irrevocable trust agreement was executed by Mississippi Power and the trustee for the bond
holders under which the bonds will be redeemed in December 2005. As a result of this legal
defeasance, there are no longer any first mortgage bond liens on Mississippi Powers
property and Mississippi Power no longer has to comply with the covenants and restrictions
of the first mortgage bond indenture. The liability associated with the first mortgage
bonds has been extinguished on Mississippi Powers balance sheet since Mississippi Power
has been legally released from being the primary obligor by the bondholders. |
|
|
(M) |
|
On May 17, 2005, the Georgia PSC approved a new three-year retail rate plan for
Savannah Electric ending May 31, 2008 (2005 Plan). Under the terms of the 2005 Plan,
earnings will be evaluated against a retail return on common equity range of 9.75% to
11.75%. Two-thirds of any earnings above 11.75% will be applied to rate refunds with the
remaining one-third retained by Savannah Electric. Retail base rates were increased by
approximately $9.6 million, or 5.1%, on an annual basis effective in June 2005 to cover the
cost of new generation and PPAs; higher operating and maintenance expenses; and continued
investment in new transmission and distribution facilities to support growth and ensure
reliability. |
Savannah Electric will not file for a general base rate increase unless its projected
retail return on common equity falls below 9.75%. Savannah Electric is required to file a
general rate case on November 30, 2007, in response to which the Georgia PSC would be
expected to determine whether the rate plan should be continued, modified, or discontinued.
126
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS: (Continued)
Savannah Electric anticipates filing a request with the Georgia PSC in August 2005 to
increase its fuel cost recovery rate in response to rising fuel costs and to recover its
under-recovered fuel balance. The ultimate outcome of this matter cannot now be determined.
|
(N) |
|
See Notes 9 and 10 to the financial statements of Savannah Electric in Item 8 of the
Form 10-K for information regarding Savannah Electrics restatement of its financial
statements for the three-month and six-month periods ended June 30, 2004 as the result of
errors in the estimate of unbilled revenues for the
period. A summary of the effects of those restatement adjustments for the three-month and
six-month periods ended June 30, 2004 is as follows (in thousands): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, 2004 |
|
June 30, 2004 |
|
|
As Originally |
|
As |
|
As Originally |
|
As |
|
|
Reported |
|
Restated |
|
Reported |
|
Restated |
|
|
|
Retail sales revenues |
|
$ |
88,437 |
|
|
$ |
87,516 |
|
|
$ |
156,460 |
|
|
$ |
155,025 |
|
Total operating revenues |
|
|
92,070 |
|
|
|
91,149 |
|
|
|
164,905 |
|
|
|
163,470 |
|
Operating income |
|
|
14,892 |
|
|
|
13,971 |
|
|
|
23,438 |
|
|
|
22,003 |
|
Earnings before income taxes |
|
|
11,830 |
|
|
|
10,908 |
|
|
|
16,776 |
|
|
|
15,341 |
|
Income taxes |
|
|
4,331 |
|
|
|
3,974 |
|
|
|
6,129 |
|
|
|
5,574 |
|
Net income |
|
|
7,499 |
|
|
|
6,934 |
|
|
|
10,647 |
|
|
|
9,767 |
|
Net income after dividends on
preferred stock |
|
|
7,349 |
|
|
|
6,784 |
|
|
|
10,497 |
|
|
|
9,617 |
|
Comprehensive income |
|
|
7,390 |
|
|
|
6,825 |
|
|
|
10,529 |
|
|
|
9,649 |
|
|
|
(O) |
|
On June 7, 2005, Southern Power, through certain of its wholly-owned subsidiaries,
acquired all of the outstanding general and limited partnership interests of Oleander Power
Project, L.P. (Oleander) from Constellation Power, Inc. and certain other subsidiaries of
Constellation Energy Group, Inc. The results of Oleanders operations have been included in
the financial statements since that date. Southern Powers acquisition of the general and
limited partnership interests in Oleander was pursuant to a Purchase and Sale Agreement
dated April 8, 2005, for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $206 million, plus
approximately $12 million of working capital and other adjustments. The total purchase
price of $206 million was allocated to property, plant, and
equipment, based on a preliminary assessment. Oleander owns a
dual-fueled generating plant in Brevard County, Florida with a nominal installed capacity
of 680 MW. The entire output of the plant is sold under separate PPAs with Florida Power &
Light Company and Seminole Electric Cooperative, Inc. The PPAs expire in 2007 and 2009,
respectively. |
|
|
(P) |
|
On July 8, 2005, Southern Company GAS signed a letter of intent to negotiate the sale
of substantially all of its assets to Cobb Electric Membership Corporation. At June 30,
2005, Southern Company GAS assets totaled $62.8 million. The proposed sale is subject to
the negotiation of a definitive sale agreement and receipt of necessary regulatory or
governmental approvals. |
|
|
(Q) |
|
In May 2005, Southern Company completed the purchase from Ormat Nevada, Inc. and
subsequent leaseback of the Puna Geothermal Facility, a 25 MW geothermal facility in Hilo,
Hawaii. The cost of the facility was approximately $71 million. Southern Companys net
investment in the leveraged lease is approximately $30 million. |
127
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS: (Continued)
|
(R) |
|
Southern Companys reportable business segment is the sale of electricity in the
Southeast by the five retail operating companies and Southern Power. The All Other
column includes parent Southern Company, which does not allocate operating expenses to
business segments. Also, this category includes segments below the quantitative
threshold for separate disclosure. These segments include investments in synthetic
fuels and leveraged lease projects, telecommunications, energy-related services, and
natural gas marketing. Southern Powers revenues from sales to the retail operating
companies were $109 million and $222 million for the three months and six months ended
June 30, 2005, respectively, and $107 million and $194 million for the three months and
six months ended June 30, 2004, respectively. All other intersegment revenues are not
material. Financial data for business segments and products and services are as
follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Electric Utilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retail |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All |
|
Reconciling |
|
|
|
|
Companies |
|
Southern Power |
|
Eliminations |
|
Total |
|
Other |
|
Eliminations |
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, 2005: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating revenues |
|
$ |
3,026 |
|
|
$ |
149 |
|
|
$ |
(126 |
) |
|
$ |
3,049 |
|
|
$ |
127 |
|
|
$ |
(31 |
) |
|
$ |
3,145 |
|
Segment net income (loss) |
|
|
332 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
357 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
387 |
|
Six Months Ended June 30, 2005: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating revenues |
|
$ |
5,723 |
|
|
$ |
302 |
|
|
$ |
(259 |
) |
|
$ |
5,766 |
|
|
$ |
300 |
|
|
|
(57 |
) |
|
$ |
6,009 |
|
Segment net income (loss) |
|
|
598 |
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
646 |
|
|
|
64 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
710 |
|
Total assets at June 30, 2005 |
|
$ |
34,391 |
|
|
$ |
2,290 |
|
|
$ |
(113 |
) |
|
$ |
36,568 |
|
|
$ |
1,899 |
|
|
$ |
(397 |
) |
|
$ |
38,070 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, 2004: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating revenues |
|
$ |
2,869 |
|
|
$ |
182 |
|
|
$ |
(135 |
) |
|
$ |
2,916 |
|
|
$ |
119 |
|
|
$ |
(26 |
) |
|
$ |
3,009 |
|
Segment net income (loss) |
|
|
308 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
331 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
352 |
|
Six Months Ended June 30, 2004: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating revenues |
|
$ |
5,411 |
|
|
$ |
358 |
|
|
$ |
(265 |
) |
|
$ |
5,504 |
|
|
$ |
292 |
|
|
$ |
(55 |
) |
|
$ |
5,741 |
|
Segment net income (loss) |
|
|
580 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
630 |
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
683 |
|
Total assets at December 31, 2004 |
|
$ |
33,524 |
|
|
$ |
2,067 |
|
|
$ |
(103 |
) |
|
$ |
35,488 |
|
|
$ |
1,996 |
|
|
$ |
(522 |
) |
|
$ |
36,962 |
|
|
Products and Services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Electric Utilities Revenues |
Period |
|
|
Retail |
|
Wholesale |
|
Other |
|
Total |
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, 2005 |
|
$ |
2,555 |
|
|
$ |
385 |
|
|
$ |
109 |
|
|
$ |
3,049 |
|
Three Months Ended June 30, 2004 |
|
|
2,478 |
|
|
|
344 |
|
|
|
94 |
|
|
|
2,916 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, 2005 |
|
$ |
4,824 |
|
|
$ |
732 |
|
|
$ |
210 |
|
|
$ |
5,766 |
|
Six Months Ended June 30, 2004 |
|
|
4,622 |
|
|
|
695 |
|
|
|
187 |
|
|
|
5,504 |
|
|
128
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings.
See the Notes to the Condensed Financial Statements herein for information regarding certain
legal and administrative proceedings in which Southern Company and its reporting subsidiaries are
involved.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum Approximate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of |
|
Dollar Value of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Purchased as |
|
Shares that May Yet |
|
|
Total Number of |
|
|
|
|
|
Part of Publicly |
|
Be Purchased Under |
|
|
Shares |
|
Average Price |
|
Announced Plans or |
|
the Plans or |
2005 |
|
Purchased (a) |
|
Paid Per Share |
|
Programs |
|
Programs (a) |
|
April 1 -
April 30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 1 -
May 31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 1 -
June 30 |
|
|
1,813,637 |
|
|
$ |
34.34 |
|
|
|
1,813,637 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
Total |
|
|
1,813,637 |
|
|
$ |
34.34 |
|
|
|
1,813,637 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
(a) |
|
In fiscal year 2004, Southern Company announced that it planned to engage an
agent in fiscal year 2005 to repurchase shares of its common stock to offset shares
issued in connection with the exercise of stock options under the Southern Omnibus
Incentive Compensation Plan (Omnibus Plan). In May 2005, Southern Company engaged an
agent to (i) begin repurchasing shares of Southern Company common stock to offset the
6,273,876 shares of common stock issued from January 2005 through May 2005 in
connection with the exercise of stock options under the Omnibus Plan and (ii)
repurchase shares of Southern Company common stock on an ongoing basis to offset
additional shares issued in connection with the exercise of stock options under the
Omnibus Plan. Southern Company has engaged the agent to effect such repurchases
through December 31, 2007. |
129
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.
Southern Company
Southern Company held its annual meeting of shareholders on May 25, 2005. Each nominee for
director of Southern Company received the requisite plurality of votes for election. The
vote tabulation was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nominees |
|
Shares For |
|
Shares Withhold Vote |
Daniel P. Amos |
|
|
574,671,959 |
|
|
|
9,594,420 |
|
Dorrit J. Bern |
|
|
574,668,187 |
|
|
|
9,598,192 |
|
Francis S. Blake |
|
|
547,962,884 |
|
|
|
36,303,495 |
|
Thomas F. Chapman |
|
|
548,131,611 |
|
|
|
36,134,768 |
|
Bruce S. Gordon |
|
|
572,993,728 |
|
|
|
11,272,651 |
|
Donald M. James |
|
|
547,558,282 |
|
|
|
36,708,097 |
|
Zack T. Pate |
|
|
575,144,117 |
|
|
|
9,122,262 |
|
J. Neal Purcell |
|
|
575,196,783 |
|
|
|
9,069,596 |
|
David M. Ratcliffe |
|
|
572,030,009 |
|
|
|
12,236,370 |
|
Gerald J. St. Pé |
|
|
574,874,447 |
|
|
|
9,391,932 |
|
In addition, at the annual meeting, shareholders were asked to vote for the ratification of
the appointment of auditors. The vote tabulation was 574,810,937 shares for, 3,750,791
shares against, and 5,704,651 shares abstaining. As a result of this vote the audit
appointment was ratified. Shareholders were also entitled to vote on the shareholder
proposal on political contributions report. The vote tabulation was 51,903,882 shares for,
343,179,489 shares against, and 39,526,361 shares abstaining. As a result of this vote,
the shareholder proposal on political contributions report was not approved.
Alabama Power
Alabama
Power held its annual meeting of common shareholders and preferred shareholders on
April 22, 2005, and the following persons were elected to serve as directors of Alabama
Power:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Whit Armstrong
|
|
Charles D. McCrary |
|
|
David J. Cooper, Sr.
|
|
Malcolm Portera |
|
|
R. Kent Henslee
|
|
Robert D. Powers |
|
|
John D. Johns
|
|
David M. Ratcliffe |
|
|
Carl E. Jones, Jr.
|
|
C. Dowd Ritter |
|
|
Patricia M. King
|
|
James H. Sanford |
|
|
James K. Lowder
|
|
John C. Webb, IV |
|
|
Wallace D. Malone, Jr.
|
|
James W. Wright |
All 8,250,000 of the shares of Alabama Powers common stock outstanding on the record date
were owned by Southern Company and were voted in favor of the nominees for directors. None
of the shares of preferred stock or Class A preferred stock were voted.
130
|
|
|
Item 4.
|
|
Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders. (Continued) |
|
|
|
|
|
Georgia Power |
|
|
|
|
|
Georgia Power held its annual meeting of common shareholders and preferred shareholders on
May 18, 2005 and the following persons were elected to serve as directors of Georgia Power: |
|
|
|
Juanita Powell Baranco
|
|
David M. Ratcliffe |
Robert L. Brown, Jr.
|
|
D. Gary Thompson |
Ronald D. Brown
|
|
Richard W. Ussery |
Anna R. Cablik
|
|
William Jerry Vereen |
Michael D. Garrett
|
|
E. Jenner Wood, III |
|
|
|
|
|
All of the 7,761,500 outstanding shares of Georgia Powers common stock are owned by
Southern Company and were voted in favor of the nominees for directors. Ten shares of
preferred stock were voted in favor of the nominees for directors. |
|
|
|
|
|
Gulf Power |
|
|
|
|
|
Gulf Power held its annual meeting of common shareholders and preferred shareholders on May
18, 2005 and the following persons were elected to serve as directors of Gulf Power: |
|
|
|
C. LeDon Anchors
|
|
William A. Pullum |
William C. Cramer, Jr.
|
|
Winston E. Scott |
Fred C. Donovan, Sr.
|
|
Susan N. Story |
|
|
|
|
|
All of the 992,717 outstanding shares of Gulf Powers common stock are owned by Southern
Company and were voted in favor of the nominees for directors. None of the shares of
preferred stock were voted. |
|
|
|
|
|
Mississippi Power |
|
|
|
|
|
Mississippi Power held its annual meeting of common shareholders and preferred shareholders
on May 18, 2005 and the following persons were elected to serve as directors of Mississippi
Power: |
|
|
|
Tommy E. Dulaney
|
|
Philip J. Terrell |
Warren A. Hood, Jr.
|
|
Anthony J. Topazi |
Robert C. Khayat
|
|
N. Eugene Warr |
George A. Schloegel |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All of the 1,121,000 outstanding shares of Mississippi Powers common stock are owned by
Southern Company and were voted in favor of the nominees for directors. None of the shares
of preferred stock were voted. |
131
|
|
|
Item 4.
|
|
Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders. (Continued) |
|
|
|
|
|
Savannah Electric |
|
|
|
|
|
By written consent, in lieu of the annual meeting of stockholders of Savannah Electric,
effective April 29, 2005, the following persons were elected to serve as directors of
Savannah Electric: |
|
|
|
Gus H. Bell, III
|
|
Anthony R. James |
Archie H. Davis
|
|
Robert B. Miller, III |
Walter D. Gnann
|
|
Arnold M. Tenenbaum |
|
|
|
|
|
All of the 10,844,635 outstanding shares of Savannah Electrics common stock are owned by
Southern Company and were voted in favor of the nominees for directors. |
|
|
|
|
|
Southern Power |
|
|
|
|
|
By written consent, in lieu of the annual meeting of stockholders of Southern Power,
effective January 5, 2005, the number of directors constituting the board of directors was
set at six and the following persons were elected to serve as directors of Southern Power: |
|
|
|
W. Paul Bowers
|
|
Charles D. McCrary |
Thomas A. Fanning
|
|
David M. Ratcliffe |
Michael D. Garrett |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All of the 1,000 outstanding shares of Southern Powers common stock are owned by Southern
Company and were voted in favor of the nominees for directors. |
|
|
|
Item 6.
|
|
Exhibits. |
|
|
|
(10)
|
|
Material Contracts |
|
|
|
|
|
Southern Power |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(g) 1
|
|
-
|
|
Multi-Year Credit Agreement among Southern Power,
Citibank N.A., as the administrative agent, and the
lenders listed therein dated as of June 10, 2005. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(g) 2
|
|
-
|
|
Purchase and Sale Agreement, by and between CP Oleander,
LP and CP Oleander I, Inc., as Sellers, Constellation
Power, Inc. and SP Newco I LLC and SP Newco II LLC, as
Purchasers, and Southern Power, as Purchasers Parent,
for the Sale of Partnership Interests of Oleander Power
Project, LP, dated as of April 8, 2005. (Designated in
Form 8-K dated June 7, 2005, File No. 333-98553, as
Exhibit 2.1 and incorporated herein by reference.) |
|
|
|
(24)
|
|
Power of Attorney and Resolutions |
|
|
|
|
|
Southern Company |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a)1
|
|
-
|
|
Power of Attorney and
resolution. (Designated in
the Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2004, File
No. 1-3526 as Exhibit 24(a)
and incorporated herein by
reference.) |
132
|
|
|
Item 6.
|
|
Exhibits. (continued) |
|
|
|
|
|
Alabama Power |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(b)1
|
|
-
|
|
Power of Attorney and
resolution. (Designated in
the Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2004, File
No. 1-3164 as Exhibit 24(b)
and incorporated herein by
reference.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(c)1
|
|
-
|
|
Power of Attorney and resolution. (Designated in
the Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004,
File No. 1-6468 as Exhibit 24(c) and incorporated
herein by reference.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(c)2
|
|
-
|
|
Power of Attorney for Cliff S. Thrasher.
(Designated in the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
March 31, 2005, File No. 1-6468 as Exhibit 24(c)2
and incorporated herein by reference.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(d)1
|
|
-
|
|
Power of Attorney and resolution. (Designated in the Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 2004, File No. 0-2429 as Exhibit 24(d) and
incorporated herein by reference.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(e)1
|
|
-
|
|
Power of Attorney and resolution. (Designated in the Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 2004, File No. 001-11229 as Exhibit 24(e) and
incorporated herein by reference.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(f)1
|
|
-
|
|
Power of Attorney and resolution. (Designated in the Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 2004, File No. 1-5072 as Exhibit 24(f) and
incorporated herein by reference.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(g)1
|
|
-
|
|
Power of Attorney and resolution. (Designated
in the Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004, File No.
333-98553 as Exhibit 24(g) and incorporated herein by reference.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(g)2
|
|
-
|
|
Power of Attorney for Ronnie L. Bates.
(Designated in the Form 10-Q the quarter ended March 31, 2005,
File No. 333-98553 as Exhibit 24(g)2 and incorporated herein by
reference.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(g)3
|
|
-
|
|
Power of Attorney for Michael W. Southern.
(Designated in the Form 10-Q the quarter ended March 31, 2005,
File No. 333-98553 as Exhibit 24(g)3 and incorporated herein by
reference.) |
133
|
|
|
Item 6.
|
|
Exhibits. (continued) |
|
|
|
(31)
|
|
Section 302 Certifications |
|
|
|
|
|
Southern Company |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a)1
|
|
-
|
|
Certificate of Southern Companys Chief Executive
Officer required by Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a)2
|
|
-
|
|
Certificate of Southern Companys Chief Financial
Officer required by Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(b)1
|
|
-
|
|
Certificate of Alabama Powers Chief Executive
Officer required by Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(b)2
|
|
-
|
|
Certificate of Alabama Powers Chief Financial
Officer required by Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(c)1
|
|
-
|
|
Certificate of Georgia Powers Chief Executive
Officer required by Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(c)2
|
|
-
|
|
Certificate of Georgia Powers Chief Financial
Officer required by Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(d)1
|
|
-
|
|
Certificate of Gulf Powers Chief Executive Officer
required by Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(d)2
|
|
-
|
|
Certificate of Gulf Powers Chief Financial Officer
required by Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(e)1
|
|
-
|
|
Certificate of Mississippi Powers Chief Executive Officer required
by Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(e)2
|
|
-
|
|
Certificate of Mississippi Powers Chief Financial Officer required
by Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
134
|
|
|
Item 6.
|
|
Exhibits. (continued) |
|
|
|
|
|
Savannah Electric |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(f)1
|
|
-
|
|
Certificate of Savannah
Electrics Chief Executive
Officer required by Section
302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(f)2
|
|
-
|
|
Certificate of Savannah
Electrics Chief Financial
Officer required by Section
302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(g)1
|
|
-
|
|
Certificate of Southern Powers Chief Executive
Officer required by Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(g)2
|
|
-
|
|
Certificate of Southern Powers Chief Financial
Officer required by Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
(32)
|
|
Section 906 Certifications |
|
|
|
|
|
Southern Company |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
|
-
|
|
Certificate of Southern Companys Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(b)
|
|
-
|
|
Certificate of Alabama Powers Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(c)
|
|
-
|
|
Certificate of Georgia Powers Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(d)
|
|
-
|
|
Certificate of Gulf Powers Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(e)
|
|
-
|
|
Certificate of Mississippi Powers Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer required by Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
135
|
|
|
Item 6.
|
|
Exhibits. (continued) |
|
|
|
|
|
Savannah Electric |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(f)
|
|
-
|
|
Certificate of Savannah Electrics Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(g)
|
|
-
|
|
Certificate of Southern Powers Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
136
THE SOUTHERN COMPANY
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
The signature of the undersigned company shall be deemed to relate only to matters having
reference to such company and any subsidiaries thereof.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
THE SOUTHERN COMPANY |
|
|
|
|
|
By
|
|
David M. Ratcliffe |
|
|
|
|
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
(Principal Executive Officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By
|
|
Thomas A. Fanning |
|
|
|
|
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
|
|
|
(Principal Financial Officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By
|
|
/s/ Wayne Boston |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Wayne Boston, Attorney-in-fact) |
|
|
Date: August 3, 2005
137
ALABAMA POWER COMPANY
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
The signature of the undersigned company shall be deemed to relate only to matters having
reference to such company and any subsidiaries thereof.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ALABAMA POWER COMPANY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By
|
|
Charles D. McCrary |
|
|
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
(Principal Executive Officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By
|
|
Art P. Beattie |
|
|
|
|
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
|
|
|
(Principal Financial Officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By
|
|
/s/ Wayne Boston |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Wayne Boston, Attorney-in-fact) |
|
|
Date: August 3, 2005
138
GEORGIA POWER COMPANY
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
The signature of the undersigned company shall be deemed to relate only to matters having
reference to such company and any subsidiaries thereof.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GEORGIA POWER COMPANY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By
|
|
Michael D. Garrett |
|
|
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
(Principal Executive Officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By
|
|
Cliff S. Thrasher |
|
|
|
|
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
|
|
|
(Principal Financial Officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By
|
|
/s/ Wayne Boston |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Wayne Boston, Attorney-in-fact) |
|
|
Date: August 3, 2005
139
GULF POWER COMPANY
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
The signature of the undersigned company shall be deemed to relate only to matters having
reference to such company and any subsidiaries thereof.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GULF POWER COMPANY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By
|
|
Susan N. Story |
|
|
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
(Principal Executive Officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By
|
|
Ronnie R. Labrato |
|
|
|
|
Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Comptroller
|
|
|
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By
|
|
/s/ Wayne Boston |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Wayne Boston, Attorney-in-fact) |
|
|
Date: August 3, 2005
140
MISSISSIPPI POWER COMPANY
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
The signature of the undersigned company shall be deemed to relate only to matters having
reference to such company and any subsidiaries thereof.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MISSISSIPPI POWER COMPANY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By
|
|
Anthony J. Topazi |
|
|
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
(Principal Executive Officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By
|
|
Frances V. Turnage |
|
|
|
|
Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
|
|
|
(Principal Financial Officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By
|
|
/s/ Wayne Boston |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Wayne Boston, Attorney-in-fact) |
Date: August 3, 2005
141
SAVANNAH ELECTRIC AND POWER COMPANY
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
The signature of the undersigned company shall be deemed to relate only to matters having
reference to such company and any subsidiaries thereof.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SAVANNAH ELECTRIC AND POWER COMPANY |
|
|
|
|
|
By
|
|
A. R. James |
|
|
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
(Principal Executive Officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By
|
|
Kirby R. Willis |
|
|
|
|
Vice President, Treasurer, Chief Financial |
|
|
Officer and Assistant Corporate Secretary |
|
|
|
|
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
|
|
|
|
|
|
By
|
|
/s/ Wayne Boston |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Wayne Boston, Attorney-in-fact) |
|
|
Date: August 3, 2005
142
SOUTHERN POWER COMPANY
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
The signature of the undersigned company shall be deemed to relate only to matters having
reference to such company and any subsidiaries thereof.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SOUTHERN POWER COMPANY |
|
|
|
|
|
By
|
|
Ronnie L. Bates |
|
|
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
(Principal Executive Officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By
|
|
Michael W. Southern |
|
|
|
|
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|
|
|
(Principal Financial Officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By
|
|
/s/ Wayne Boston |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Wayne Boston, Attorney-in-fact) |
|
|
Date: August 3, 2005
143