GH Capital Inc. - Annual Report: 2018 (Form 10-K)

William Eilers was appointed on May 24, 2017 as a Director of the Company. Mr. Eilers has been a securities attorney for ten years focusing his practice on mid and micro-cap securities transactions. Mr. Eilers is well versed the requirements of SEC compliance as it relates to issuers and securities transactions. He has provided services related to private securities transactions, private raises under federal securities laws, corporate governance, capital structures, going public transactions, mergers, corporate actions, and OTC Markets alternative reporting compliance. Mr. Eilers also provides general consulting services related to fund raising and going public. Recently, Mr. Eilers has begun to focus on the implementation of equity crowdfunding and its application in underserved communities in rural Appalachia. Mr. Eilers is a graduate of North Carolina State University, magna cum laude, and received his juris doctorate from the University Of Miami School Of Law.

Bane Katic was appointed on October 23, 2018 as the Chief Operating Officer of the Company. Mr. Katic has over fifteen years of experience in marketing and media. In 2001, he worked for Sky Germany as a broadcast operations officer. In 2011, he started Netbox, an IT development company, where he managed 28 employees in providing software solutions. Since 2016, Mr. Katic has acted as a start-up consultant in Europe focusing on increasing marketing sales.

Involvement in Certain Legal Proceedings

None of our directors or executive officers has, during the past ten years:

Except as set forth in our discussion below in “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions,” none of our directors or executive officers has been involved in any transactions with us or any of our directors, executive officers, affiliates or associates which are required to be disclosed pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Commission.

Term of Office

Our directors are appointed for a one-year term to hold office until the next annual general meeting of our shareholders or until removed from office in accordance with our bylaws. Our officers are appointed by our board of directors and hold office until removed by the board.

Family Relationships

There are no family relationships among any of our officers or directors.

Employment Agreements

Mr. Ruecker is not subject to any formal employment agreement. He has agreed to provide services to us without compensation until such time as we have earnings from revenue, at which time we will re-consider paying him a salary.

Mr. Bollander receives payment of $1,000 per month, as does Mr. Eilers.

Mr. Katic does not receive any salary.

ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

The following sets forth information with respect to the compensation awarded or paid to Wolfgang Ruecker, our former President and Chief Executive Officer and current Director, Carl Podeyn, our former Chief Operating Officer, Bane Katic, our Chief Operating Officer, William Bollander, our Chief Executive Officer and Director, and William Eilers, our Director, for all services rendered in all capacities to us in fiscal year 2018 and 2017. These executive officers are referred to as the “named executive officers” throughout this report.

Summary Compensation Table

The following table sets forth information regarding each element of compensation that we paid or awarded to our named executive officers for fiscal year 2018 and 2017.

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End Table

We had no outstanding equity awards as of the end of fiscal year 2018.

Compensation of Directors

Other than compensation expense disclosed above, our directors receive no other compensation.

ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS.

Securities Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans

None.

The following table sets forth certain information as of December 26, 2018 with respect to the holdings of: (1) each person known to us to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of our common stock; (2) each of our directors, nominees for director and named executive officers; and (3) all directors and executive officers as a group. Each of the persons named in the table below as beneficially owning the shares set forth therein has sole voting power and sole investment power with respect to such shares, unless otherwise indicated.

ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE.

Transactions with Related Persons

Please refer to Note 6 of our financial statements for the year ended September 30, 2018.

Director Independence

We do not have any independent directors. Because our common stock is not currently listed on a national securities exchange, we have used the definition of “independence” of The NASDAQ Stock Market to make this determination.  NASDAQ Listing Rule 5605(a)(2) provides that an “independent director” is a person other than an officer or employee of the company or any other individual having a relationship which, in the opinion of the Company’s Board of Directors, would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director.  The NASDAQ listing rules provide that a director cannot be considered independent if:

William Eilers, Bane Katic, and William Bollander are not considered independent because each is an executive officer of the Company.

We do not currently have a separately designated audit, nominating or compensation committee.

ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES

Salberg & Company, P.A., served for the year ended September 30, 2017 all interim periods and the year ended September 30, 2018.

Audit Fees

For the Company’s fiscal year ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, we were billed approximately $23,000 and $11,000 by Salberg & Company, P.A., a professional services rendered by our independent auditors for the audit and review of our financial statements (See item 9).

Audit Related Fees

There were no fees for audit related services rendered by our independent auditors or the years ended September 30, 2018 and 2017.

Tax Fees

For the Company’s fiscal years ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, there were no fees for professional services rendered by our independent auditors for tax compliance, tax advice, and tax planning.

All Other Fees

The Company did not incur any other fees related to services rendered by our independent auditors for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2018 and 2017.

Pre-Approval Policies

Effective May 6, 2003, the Securities and Exchange Commission adopted rules that require that before our auditor is engaged by us to render any auditing or permitted non-audit related service, the engagement be:

- approved by our audit committee; or

- entered into pursuant to pre-approval policies and procedures established by the audit committee, provided the policies and procedures are detailed as to the particular  service,  the  audit committee is informed of each service, and such policies and procedures do not include delegation of the audit committee’s responsibilities to management.

We do not have an audit committee.  Our entire board of directors pre-approves all services provided by our independent auditors.

All of the above services and fees were reviewed and approved by the entire board of directors before the respective services were rendered.

PART IV

Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules.

a) Documents filed as part of this Annual Report

1. Financial Statements

2. Financial Statement Schedules

3. Exhibits

(3) EXHIBITS. The following exhibits required by Item 601 to be filed herewith are incorporated by reference to previously filed documents:

(1) Incorporated by reference to the Company’s previously filed Form S-1 Registration Statement, on June 2, 2016.

(2) Incorporated by reference to the Company’s previously filed Form S-1 Registration Statement, amendment 2, on August 26, 2016

+ In accordance with SEC Release 33-8238, Exhibits 32.1 is being furnished and not filed.

* In accordance with Regulation S-T, the XBRL-related information in Exhibit 101 to this report shall be deemed “furnished” and not “filed.”

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

GH CAPITAL INC.

INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

September 30, 2018

CONTENTS

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of:

GH Capital Inc.

Opinion on the Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of GH Capital, Inc. (the “Company”) as of September 30, 2018 and 2017, the related statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss), changes in stockholders’ equity (deficit) and cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended September 30, 2018 and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “financial statements”). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of September 30, 2018 and 2017, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended September 30, 2018, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Going Concern

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 2 to the financial statements, the Company has a net loss of $1,058,972 and net cash used in operating activities of $215,699 for the year ended September 30, 2018. The Company also has an accumulated deficit of $6,390,864 and a working capital deficit of $888,693 at September 30, 2018. These matters raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s Plan regarding these matters is also described in Note 2. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

Basis for Opinion

These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.

Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

2295 NW Corporate Blvd., Suite 240 • Boca Raton, FL 33431

Phone: (561) 995-8270 • Toll Free: (866) CPA-8500 • Fax: (561) 995-1920

www.salbergco.com • info@salbergco.com

Member National Association of Certified Valuation Analysts • Registered with the PCAOB

Member CPAConnect with Affiliated Offices Worldwide • Member Center for Public Company Audit Firms

GH CAPITAL INC.

BALANCE SHEETS

See accompanying notes to financial statements.

GH CAPITAL INC.

STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)

See accompanying notes to financial statements.

GH CAPITAL INC.

STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)

FOR THE YEARS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2018 AND 2017

See accompanying notes to financial statements.

GH CAPITAL INC.

STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

See accompanying notes to financial statements.

NOTE 1 - ORGANIZATION AND NATURE OF OPERATIONS  

GH Capital Inc. (the “Company”), a Florida corporation, was formed on May 5, 2014 and commenced operations in October 2014. The Company provided online payment processing services to consumers, primarily in Europe and provides certain consulting services to assist companies in going public.

On September 18, 2018, the Company’s management terminated the Company’s online payment processing services. As a result, the Company will shift its focus to its consulting services business. As such, the online payment processing services business activities were reclassified and reported as part of “discontinued operations”.

NOTE 2 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES 

Basis of Presentation

The financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”) and in accordance with Regulation S-X of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). The Company’s fiscal year ends on September 30, of each year.

Going Concern

These financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis, which contemplates the realization of assets and the settlement of liabilities and commitments in the normal course of business. As reflected in the accompanying financial statements, the Company had net losses of $1,058,972 and $5,051,835 for the years ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively. The net cash used in operations were $215,699 and $147,156 for the years ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively. Additionally, the Company had an accumulated deficit of $6,390,864 at September 30, 2018. It is management’s opinion that these conditions raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern for a period of twelve months from the issue date of this report. The Company is seeking to raise capital through additional debt and/or equity financings to fund its operations in the future. Management cannot provide assurance that the Company will ultimately achieve profitable operations or become cash flow positive, or raise additional debt and/or equity capital. Although the Company has historically raised capital from sales of common stock and debt financing, there is no assurance that it will be able to continue to do so. If the Company is unable to raise additional capital or secure additional debt in the near future, management expects that the Company will need to curtail its operations. These financial statements do not include any adjustments related to the recoverability and classification of assets or the amounts and classification of liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.

Use of Estimates 

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the year. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Included in these estimates are valuation of marketable securities, assumptions used in determining the useful lives and valuations of long-lived assets, the fair value of derivative liabilities, valuation allowance for deferred tax assets and the valuation of stock issued for services or upon conversion of debt.

NOTE 2 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)

Fair value of financial instruments and fair value measurements

FASB ASC 820 — Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 820 requires disclosures about the fair value of all financial instruments, whether or not recognized, for financial statement purposes. Disclosures about the fair value of financial instruments are based on pertinent information available to the Company on September 30, 2018. Accordingly, the estimates presented in these financial statements are not necessarily indicative of the amounts that could be realized on disposition of the financial instruments. 

FASB ASC 820 specifies a hierarchy of valuation techniques based on whether the inputs to those valuation techniques are observable or unobservable. Observable inputs reflect market data obtained from independent sources, while unobservable inputs reflect market assumptions. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1 measurement) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurement). The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are as follows:

Level 1- Inputs are unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities available at the measurement date.

Level 2- Inputs are quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets and liabilities in markets that are not active, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable, and inputs derived from or corroborated by observable market data.

Level 3- Inputs are unobservable inputs that reflect the reporting entity’s own assumptions on what assumptions the market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability based on the best available information.

The carrying amounts reported in the balance sheets for cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, loans, accounts payable, accrued expenses, and other payables approximate their fair market value based on the short-term maturity of these instruments.

The Company analyzes all financial and non-financial instruments with features of both liabilities and equity under the FASB’s accounting standard for such instruments. Under this standard, financial and non-financial assets and liabilities are classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.

The Company accounts for the following instruments at fair value. 

Fair Value of Financial Assets and Liabilities Measured on a Recurring Basis

Marketable securities are adjusted to fair value each balance sheet date, based on quoted prices; which are considered level 1 inputs (see note 3). The estimated fair value is not necessarily indicative of the amounts the Company would realize in a current market exchange or from future earnings or cash flows. The fair value of marketable securities categorized as Level 1 that are measured on a recurring basis totaled $0 and $2,734 as of September 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively.

NOTE 2 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)

The Company’s convertible notes payable approximate the fair value of such instruments based upon management’s best estimate of interest rates that would be available to the Company for similar financial arrangements as of September 30, 2018. The Company uses Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy to measure the fair value of the derivative liabilities (see note 7) and revalues its derivative liability on the conversion feature at every reporting period and recognizes gains or losses in the statements of operations that are attributable to the change in the fair value of the derivative liabilities. The fair value of derivative financial instruments, measured and recorded at fair value on the Company’s balance sheets on a recurring basis, and their level within the fair value hierarchy as of September 30, 2018 measured $589,980.

A roll forward of the level 3 derivative liabilities is as follows:

Cash and Cash Equivalents

For purposes of the statements of cash flows, the Company considers all highly liquid instruments with a maturity of three months or less at the purchase date and money market accounts to be cash equivalents The Company had no cash equivalents during the years ended September 30, 2018 and 2017.

Investments, Carried at Cost

The Company accounts for equity investments that do not have a readily determinable fair value as cost method investments under the measurement alternative prescribed within Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2016-01, Financial Instruments – Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities , to the extent such investments are not subject to consolidation or the equity method. Under the measurement alternative, these financial instruments are carried at cost, less any impairment (assessed quarterly), plus or minus changes resulting from observable price changes in orderly transactions for an identical or similar investment of the same issuer. In addition, income is recognized when dividends are received only to the extent they are distributed from net accumulated earnings of the investee. Otherwise, such distributions are considered returns of investment and are recorded as a reduction of the cost of the investment. In March 2017, the Company received 18,000,000 common shares, 19.6%, of Vmoney Holdings, Inc. (“Vmoney”) a startup company as a consulting fee and management determined that such securities were non-marketable and had a zero value at the receipt date and as of September 30, 2018. Furthermore the Company’s then CEO received 5,000,000 common shares from Vmoney as a consulting fee for similar consulting services. Since his personal services cannot be separated as CEO, these 5,000,000 were treated as compensation to him, however, since these shares were deemed to have a zero fair value and also a zero book value, there was no accounting effect to this compensation.

Concentration of Credit Risk, Accounts Receivable and Revenues 

The Company maintains its cash in financial institutions in the United States for which balances are insured up to Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation limits of $250,000 per account. The Company also maintains cash in financial institutions based in the country of Cyprus. At September 30, 2018, bank accounts in Cyprus are insured for up to $119,000 per Bank under the regulations of the European Union. At September 30, 2018, $3,655, was maintained in the Cyprus accounts. At times, cash balances may exceed the insured limits. The Company had no amounts that exceeded insured limits at September 30, 2018 and 2017.

NOTE 2 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)

All of the Company’s revenues from continuing operations are from customers that are located outside of the United States. There is one customer that accounts for 89% of revenues from continuing operations in fiscal year 2018 and another customer that accounts for 100 % of the Company’s Accounts Receivable balance at September 30, 2018. Accounts receivable included in discontinued operations that were due from a related party was $0 and $908 at September 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively.

Prepaid Expenses and Other Current Assets

Prepaid expenses and other current assets of $7,250 and $10,167 at September 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively, consist primarily of costs paid for future services which will occur within a year. Prepaid expenses may include prepayments in cash and equity instruments for consulting, public relations and business advisory services, and accounting fees which are being amortized over the terms of their respective agreements.

Marketable Securities

Pursuant to ASC 320, Investments – Debt and Equity Securities, marketable securities held by the Company are held for an indefinite period of time and thus are classified as available-for-sale securities. The fair value is based on quoted market prices for the investment as of the balance sheet date. Realized investment gains and losses are included in the statement of operations, as are provisions for other than temporary declines in the market value of available for-sale securities. Unrealized gains and unrealized losses deemed to be temporary are excluded from earnings (losses), net of applicable taxes, as a component of other comprehensive income (loss). Factors considered in judging whether an impairment is other than temporary include the financial condition, business prospects and creditworthiness of the issuer, the length of time that fair value has been less than cost, the relative amount of decline, and the Company’s ability and intent to hold the investment until the fair value recovers. Realized gains and losses and decline in value judged to be other than temporary on available-for-sale securities are included in the statements of operations. The cost of securities sold or disposed is determined on first-in first-out, or FIFO method.

Capitalized Software Development Costs

Software development costs related to the development of our electronic payment platform software, which is developed for internal use, falls under the accounting guidance of ASC Topic 350-40, Intangibles Goodwill and Other–Internal Use Software, in which computer software costs are expensed as incurred during the preliminary project stage and capitalization begins in the application development stage once the capitalization criteria are met. Costs capitalized during the application development stage include external direct costs of materials and services consumed in developing or obtaining internal-use software and payroll and payroll-related costs for employees who are directly associated with, and who devote time to, the internal-use computer software. Once the project is substantially complete and ready for its intended use these costs are amortized on a straight-line basis over the technology’s estimated useful life of three years. 

Intangible Assets

Intangible assets with finite lives primarily consist of licensed technology and were being amortized on a straight-line basis over the expected period to be benefited by future cash flows of two years and reviewed for impairment. As a result, we fully impaired all intangible assets as of September 30, 2017.

NOTE 2 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)

Impairment of Long-lived Assets

In accordance with ASC Topic 360, the Company reviews long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the assets may not be fully recoverable, or at least annually. The Company recognizes an impairment loss when the sum of expected undiscounted future cash flows is less than the carrying amount of the asset. The amount of impairment is measured as the difference between the asset’s estimated fair value and its book value.  

Derivative Liabilities

The Company evaluates all its financial instruments to determine if those contracts or any potential embedded components of those contracts qualify as derivatives to be separately accounted for in accordance with FASB ASC 815-10-05-4 and 815-40.  This accounting treatment requires that the carrying amount of any embedded conversion options be recorded at fair value at issuance and marked-to-market at each balance sheet date.  In the event that the fair value is recorded as a liability, as is the case with the Company, the change in the fair value during the period is recorded as either other income or expense. Upon conversion, exercise and repayment, the respective derivative liability is marked to fair value at the conversion, repayment or exercise date, and then the related fair value amount is reclassified to other income or expense as part of gain or loss on debt extinguishment.

Revenue Recognition

The Company recognizes revenue when persuasive evidence of a sale arrangement exists, services have been rendered, the sales price is fixed and determinable and collectability is reasonably assured. There are two sources of recognized revenue. These comprise (1) payment processing services related to online money transfer transactions for diversified online merchants with a target market in Europe and (2) consulting for business development. For the consulting services, included in continuing operations, revenue is recognized when the Company satisfies the performance obligation based on the consulting agreement. The Company received consideration in the form of cash and/or securities. The Company measures and recognizes these securities received at fair value on the date the revenues are agreed upon over the terms of the related consulting agreement. In the payment processing segment, which is included in loss from discontinued operations, revenues consisted of fees generated through the electronic processing of payment transactions and related services, and was recognized as revenue during the period the transactions were processed or when the related services were performed. Merchants may be charged for these processing services at a bundled rate based on a percentage of the dollar amount of each transaction and, in some instances, additional fees are charged for each transaction. Merchant customers were generally charged a flat fee plus percentage per transaction, while others may also be charged miscellaneous fees, including fees for chargebacks or returns, monthly minimums, and other miscellaneous services. Revenues also included any up-front fees for the work involved in implementing the basic functionality required to provide electronic payment processing services to a customer. Revenue from such implementation fees was recognized over the term of the related service contract. The Company’s revenue was comprised of monthly recurring services provided to customers, for whom charges are contracted for over a specified period of time. Payments received from customers that are related to future periods are recorded as deferred revenue until the service is provided.

Cost of Revenues

Cost of revenues primarily includes labor cost or fees related to the Company’s consulting business services.

Stock-Based Compensation 

Stock-based compensation is accounted for based on the requirements of ASC 718, Share-Based Payment, which requires recognition in the financial statements of the cost of employee and director services received in exchange for an award of equity instruments over the period the employee or director is required to perform the services in exchange for the award (presumptively, the vesting period). The Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) also requires measurement of the cost of employee and director services received in exchange for an award based on the grant-date fair value of the award. Pursuant to ASC Topic 505-50, for share-based payments non-employees, compensation expense is determined at the measurement date defined as the earlier of a) the date at which a commitment for performance by the counterparty to earn the equity instruments is reached or b) the date at which the counterparty’s performance is complete.

NOTE 2 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)

The expense is recognized over the vesting period of the award. Until the measurement date is reached, the total amount of compensation expense remains uncertain. The Company records compensation expense based on the fair value of the award at the reporting date. The awards to consultants and other third-parties are then revalued, or the total compensation is recalculated, based on the then current fair value, at each subsequent reporting date.

Research and Development

Research and development costs are expensed as incurred.

Income Taxes 

The Company recognizes deferred tax liabilities and assets based on the temporary differences between the financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities that will result in future taxable or deductible amounts, based on enacted tax laws and rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to affect taxable income. Temporary differences between taxable income reported for financial reporting purposes and income tax purposes consist primarily of timing differences such as stock-based compensation and deferred revenue. A valuation allowance is provided against net deferred tax assets when the Company determines it is more likely than not that it will fail to generate sufficient taxable income to be able to realize the deferred tax assets.

The Company follows the accounting guidance for uncertainty in income taxes using the provisions of ASC 740, Income Taxes. Using that guidance, tax positions initially need to be recognized in the financial statements when it is more likely than not the position will be sustained upon examination by the tax authorities. As of September 30, 2018 and 2017, the Company had no uncertain tax positions that qualify for either recognition or disclosure in the financial statements. The Company’s 2015 to 2017 tax returns are subject to examination. The Company recognizes interest and penalties related to uncertain income tax positions in other expense. However, no such interest and penalties were recorded during the years ended September 30, 2018 and 2017.

Loss per Common Share and Common Share Equivalent 

Basic net loss per share is computed by dividing the net loss by the weighted average number of common shares during the period. Diluted net loss per share is computed using the weighted average number of common shares and potentially dilutive securities outstanding during the period. At September 30, 2018, the Company has 46,672,138 and 50,000 potentially dilutive securities outstanding, respectively, related to the convertible promissory notes and outstanding stock warrants. Those potentially dilutive common stock equivalents were excluded from the dilutive loss per share calculation as they would be antidilutive. The Company had no dilutive securities outstanding during the year ended September 30, 2017. In addition, there are 39,960,798 shares reserved for issuance related to convertible note agreements.

Foreign Currency Transactions

The reporting and functional currency of the Company is the U.S. dollar. Transactions denominated in foreign currencies are translated into the functional currency at the exchange rates prevailing on the transaction dates. Assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are translated into the functional currency at the exchange rates prevailing at the balance sheet date with any transaction gains and losses that arise from exchange rate fluctuations on transactions denominated in a currency other than the functional currency are included in the results of operations as incurred. Transaction gains or losses have not had, and are not expected to have, a material effect on the results of operations of the Company.

NOTE 2 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)

Recently Issued Accounting Standards 

From time to time, the FASB or other standards setting bodies will issue new accounting pronouncements. Updates to the FASB ASC are communicated through issuance of an Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”).

In May 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606),” (“ASU 2014-09”). ASU 2014-09 outlines a new, single comprehensive model for entities to use in accounting for revenue arising from contracts with customers and supersedes most current revenue recognition guidance, including industry-specific guidance. This new revenue recognition model provides a five-step analysis in determining when and how revenue is recognized. The new model will require revenue recognition to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration a company expects to receive in exchange for those goods or services. ASU 2014-09 is effective for public entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016 and interim periods within those periods. Early adoption is not permitted.

The FASB has approved a one-year deferral of the effective date (for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017) with the option to early adopt using the original effective date. Entities may use either a full retrospective or a modified retrospective approach to adopt ASU 2014-09. In December 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-20, Technical Corrections and Improvements to Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, or ASU 2016-20. In May 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-12, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Narrow-Scope Improvements and Practical Expedients, or ASU 2016-12. In April 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-10, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Identifying Performance Obligations and Licensing, or ASU 2016-10. In March 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-08, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Principal versus Agent Considerations (Reporting Revenue Gross), or ASU 2016-08.

These updates provide additional clarification and implementation guidance on the previously issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606), or ASU 2014-09. The amendments in ASU 2016-20 provide technical corrections to various implementation examples and clarifying guidance on the treatment of capitalized advertising costs, impairment testing of capitalized contract costs, performance obligation disclosures and scope exceptions. The amendments in ASU 2016-12 provide clarifying guidance on assessing collectability; noncash consideration; presentation of sales taxes; and transition. The amendments in ASU 2016-10 provide clarifying guidance on the materiality and evaluation of performance obligations; treatment of shipping and handling costs; and determining whether an entity’s promise to grant a license provides a customer with either a right to use or a right to access an entity’s intellectual property. The amendments in ASU 2016-08 clarify how an entity should identify the specified good or service for the principal versus agent evaluation and how it should apply the control principle to certain types of arrangements. Collectively, these updates will require a company to recognize revenue when it transfers promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the company expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. The adoption of ASU 2016-20, ASU 2016-12, ASU 2016-10 and ASU 2016-08 is to coincide with an entity’s adoption of ASU 2014-09. The new guidance permits adoption through either a full retrospective approach or a modified retrospective approach with a cumulative effect adjustment to retained earnings. The Company will adopt this standard as required on October 1, 2018. The Company has assessed the impact that adopting this new accounting guidance will have on its financial statements and footnote disclosures and believes such impact will not be material.

NOTE 2 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)

In January 2017, the FASB issued the Accounting Standards Update No. 2017-01 (“ASU 2017-01”), Clarifying the Definition of a Business. ASU 2017-01 clarifies the definition of a business and establishes a screening process to determine whether an integrated set of assets and activities acquired is deemed the acquisition of a business or the acquisition of assets. ASU 2017-01 is effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2017 and should be applied prospectively, with early adoption permitted. The Company does not expect that adoption of ASU 2017-01 will have a material impact on its financial statements and related disclosures. 

In June 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-07, Improvements to Nonemployee Share-Based Payment Accounting, which simplifies several aspects of the accounting for nonemployee share-based payment transactions by expanding the scope of the stock-based compensation guidance in ASC 718 to include share-based payment transactions for acquiring goods and services from non-employees. ASU No. 2018-07 is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those annual periods. Early adoption is permitted, but entities may not adopt prior to adopting the new revenue recognition guidance in ASC 606. The Company is evaluating the impact this ASU will have on its financial statements.

In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-13, “Changes to Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurements”, which will improve the effectiveness of disclosure requirements for recurring and nonrecurring fair value measurements. The standard removes, modifies, and adds certain disclosure requirements, and is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2019. The Company will be evaluating the impact this standard will have on the Company’s financial statements.

Management does not believe that any other recently issued, but not yet effective accounting pronouncements, if adopted, would have a material effect on the accompanying financial statements.

NOTE 3 – MARKETABLE SECURITIES

The Company classifies its marketable securities as available-for-sale securities, which are carried at their fair value based on the quoted market prices of the securities with unrealized gains and losses, net of deferred income taxes, reported as accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), a separate component of stockholders’ equity. Realized gains and losses on available-for-sale securities are included in net earnings in the period earned or incurred. For the years ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, realized gains (losses) from the sale of available-for-sale securities were $838 and ($1,693), respectively.

The following summarizes the carrying value of marketable securities as of September 30, 2018 and 2017:

NOTE 4 – CAPITALIZED SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT COSTS  

At September 30, 2018 and 2017, capitalized software development costs, net consisted of the following:

For the years ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, the Company recorded amortization expense of $0 and $22,700, respectively. The Company reviews intangible assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of assets may not be recoverable. As a result during the year ended September 30, 2017, we recorded a non-cash impairment charge of $55,489 (which consisted of a $90,800 cost less accumulated amortization of $35,311), associated with the software development costs. These charges are included in the Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss).

NOTE 5 – INTANGIBLE ASSETS    

At September 30, 2018 and 2017, intangible assets consisted of the following:

In May, 2017 the Company licensed certain software technology in exchange for 190,000 common shares valued at $38,000.

Intangible assets are amortized on a straight-line method of amortization over their estimated useful lives. Intangible assets are reviewed for impairment annually or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be fully recoverable.

For the years ended September 30, 2018 and 2017 amortization expense amounted to $0 and $7,917, respectively. There was an asset impairment charge recorded in the amount of $30,083 for the year ended September 30, 2017.

NOTE 6 - RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS    

On March 30, 2015, the Company entered into a services contract with Global Humax Cyprus Ltd. (“Cyprus”), a company owned by the Company’s chief executive officer. Under the terms of the contract, the Company will provide services to Cyprus for a period of two years from the date of the agreement. Additionally, the Company earns fees from the processing of payment transactions and related services from Cyprus. For the years ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, aggregate revenues – related party amount to $6,364 and $17,279 respectively.

NOTE 6 - RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS (continued)   

During the year ended September 30, 2015, Cyprus paid various general and administrative expenses on behalf of the Company in the amount of $3,173. These advances are non-interest bearing and are due on demand. At September 30, 2018 and 2017, the Company owed Cyprus $3,173 and $3,173, respectively.

During the year ended September 30, 2015, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer advanced $10 to the Company for working capital purpose. The advance is non-interest bearing and payable on demand. At September 30, 2018 and 2017, the Company owed its Chief Executive Officer $10 and $10, respectively.

During the year ended September 30, 2018, the Company’s Attorney advanced $1,070 to the Company for working capital purpose. The advance is non-interest bearing and payable on demand. At September 30, 2018 and 2017, the Company owed its Attorney $1,070 and $0, respectively.

In addition to stock-based compensation (see Note 8), for the years ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, the Company paid cash compensation to a designated member of its board of directors in the amount of $13,500 and $16,900 in connection with a written agreement with the director, respectively.

On April 24, 2017, the Company entered into a Consulting Agreement with an unrelated start-up company whereby the Company agreed to provide certain services related to business development for the entity in exchange for 18,000,000 founder shares of common stock of the company which represented approximately 19% of that entity. The shares received were valued at estimated fair value of zero and the receipt of shares resulted in the entity becoming a related party to the Company. Furthermore the Company’s then CEO received 5,000,000 common shares from Vmoney as a consulting fee for similar consulting services. Since his personal services cannot be separated as CEO, these 5,000,000 were treated as compensation to him however since these shares were deemed to have a zero fair value and also a zero book value, there was no accounting effect to this compensation. After 10 months of providing services, the parties believed it best to extend the term of the agreement through September 30, 2018 in exchange for $56,000 to the Company as the entity has chosen to “go public” through an S-1 filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission which will require additional resources on behalf of the Company. During the year ended September 30, 2018, the Company recognized revenue - related party of $56,000 in connection with this agreement.

NOTE 7– CONVERTIBLE PROMISSORY NOTES

On October 10, 2017, the Company issued a 12% Convertible Promissory Note for principal borrowings of $160,000 to a non-related party. The 12% convertible promissory note and all accrued interest are due on July 10, 2018. The Company received proceeds of $143,250 in cash which is net of offering costs of $16,750, recorded as a discount. The note is unsecured and bears interest at the rate of 12% per annum from the issuance date thereof until the note is paid. The note holder shall have the right to convert beginning on the date which is following the issuance date the outstanding principal amount and accrued but unpaid interest into the Company’s common stock at a conversion price equal to a price which is the lower of $0.65 per share or 55% of the lowest trading price of the Company’s common stock during the 25 trading days immediately preceding the conversion date. At any time during the period beginning on the issue date and ending on the date which is 90 days following the issue date, the Borrower shall have the right, exercisable on not less than 3 trading days prior written notice to the holder of the Note to prepay the outstanding Note (principal and accrued interest), in full by making a payment to the Holder of an amount in cash equal to 130%, multiplied by the sum of then outstanding principal amount of the Note plus accrued and unpaid interest on the unpaid principal amount of the Note plus default interest, if any. During the first 180 days following the date of the note, the Company has the right to prepay the principal and accrued but unpaid interest due under the note, together with any other amounts that the Company may owe the holder under the terms of the note, at a premium of 140%. After this initial 180-day period, the Company does not have a right to prepay the note. Any amount of principal or interest on this note which is not paid when due shall bear interest at the rate of 24% per annum from the due date thereof until the same is paid.

NOTE 7– CONVERTIBLE PROMISSORY NOTES (continued)

The conversion price, however, is subject to full ratchet anti-dilution in the event that the Company issues any securities at a per share price lower than the conversion price then in effect. The Note contains representations, warranties, and events of default, beneficial ownership limitations, and other provisions that are customary of similar instruments.

On April 26, 2018 the Company issued 25,000 shares of common stock to the noteholder with a contractual conversion price of $0.04 to convert $0 principal amount with $501 of accrued and unpaid interest and $500 conversion fee, totaling $1,001.

On May 25, 2018 the Company issued 50,000 shares of common stock to the noteholder with a contractual conversion price of $0.03 to convert $0 principal amount with $902 of accrued and unpaid interest and $500 conversion fee, totaling $1,402.

On June 12, 2018 the Company issued 110,000 shares of common stock to the noteholder with a contractual conversion price of $0.03 to convert $0 principal amount with $2,585 of accrued and unpaid interest and $500 conversion fee, totaling $3,085.

On July 10, 2018, the Company failed to make the repayment of the outstanding principal and interest at the maturity date which causes the default interest rate of 24% to become effective.

On August 21, 2018 the Company issued 150,000 shares of common stock to the noteholder with a contractual conversion price of $0.02 to convert $0 principal amount with $2,056 of accrued and unpaid interest and $500 conversion fee, totaling $2,556.

On September 7, 2018 the Company issued 100,000 shares of common stock to the noteholder with a contractual conversion price of $0.01 to convert $0 principal amount with $544 of accrued and unpaid interest and $500 conversion fee, totaling $1,044.

On September 28, 2018 the Company issued 180,000 shares of common stock to the noteholder with a contractual conversion price of $0.0048 to convert $0 principal amount with $364 of accrued and unpaid interest and $500 conversion fee, totaling $864. The conversion price falling below $0.01 triggered clause 1.4(g) of the promissory note which allows for the principal amount of the note to increase by $15,000. Per the noteholder, this $15,000 will be added to the principal at the end of the note, allowing the Company to convert out of the original principal and interest first, however, for accounting purposes the $15,000 was added to the principal on September 25, 2018. In addition, the variable conversion price shall be redefined to mean 40% multiplied by the market price (or a 60% discount).

As of September 30, 2018, the principal balance of this note is $175,000 and accrued interest of $16,627.

In February 2018, under a Securities Purchase Agreement, the Company issued a 10% Convertible Promissory Note for principal borrowings of up to $180,000 and received initial proceeds of $60,000. In June 2018, the Company received additional proceeds of $20,000 which resulted to a total of $80,000 proceeds. The 10% convertible promissory notes and all accrued interest are due in twelve months from the effective date of each tranche. The notes are unsecured and bears interest at the rate of 10% per annum from the issuance date thereof until the notes are paid. The note holder shall have the right to convert beginning on the issuance date, the outstanding principal amount and accrued but unpaid interest into the Company’s common stock at a conversion price to a price which is 65% of the lowest trading price of the Company’s common stock during the 25 prior trading days to the conversion date subject to increases in the discount rate based on certain future events. If at any time while this note is outstanding, the conversion price is equal to or lower than $0.15, then an additional 15% discount shall be added into the conversion price resulting in a discount rate of 50%.

NOTE 7– CONVERTIBLE PROMISSORY NOTES (continued)

During the first 90 days following the date of this note, the Company has the right to prepay the principal and accrued but unpaid interest due under this note, together with any other amounts that the Company may owe the holder under the terms of this note, at a premium ranging from 135% to 145% as defined in the note agreement. After this initial 90-day period, the Company does not have a right to prepay the note. Any amount of principal or interest on this note which is not paid when due shall bear interest at the rate of 15% per annum from the due date thereof until the same is paid. The conversion price, however, is subject to full ratchet anti-dilution in the event that the Company issues any securities at a per share price lower than the conversion price then in effect.

The Company paid an original issuance discount of $8,000 and related loan fees of $3,500 in connection with this note payable which is being amortized over the term of the note. The Note contains representations, warranties, events of default, beneficial ownership limitations, piggyback registration rights and other provisions that are customary of similar instruments.

On September 5, 2018 the Company issued 270,000 shares of common stock to the noteholder with a contractual conversion price of $0.01 to convert $3,023 principal amount with $0 of accrued and unpaid interest and $500 conversion fee, totaling $3,523.

As of September 30, 2018, the principal balance of this note is $76,977.

The Company evaluated whether or not the above two convertible promissory notes contains embedded conversion features, which meet the definition of derivatives under ASC 815 and related interpretations. The Company determined that the terms of the notes discussed above contains conversion terms, primarily those resulting in an indeterminable number of shares being issued upon conversion which causes the embedded conversion option to be bifurcated and accounted for as derivative liability at fair value.

In connection with the issuance of these notes during the year ended September 30, 2018, on the initial measurement date of the notes, the fair values of the embedded conversion option of $423,778 was recorded as derivative liabilities of which $218,234 was charged to current period operations as initial derivative expense, and $205,544 was recorded as a debt discount which will be amortized into interest expense over the term of the note. Upon conversion, the respective derivative liability was marked to fair value at the conversion, and then a related fair value amount of $4,751 relating to the portion of debt converted was reclassified to other income or expense as part of gain or loss on debt extinguishment. Additionally, the Company recorded loss on debt extinguishment of $41,481 during the year ended September 30, 2018 in connection with the conversion of notes. 

At the end of each reporting period, the Company revalues the embedded conversion option derivative liabilities. In connection with the revaluation, the Company recorded a loss from change in fair value of conversion option liability of $170,953 for the year ended September 30, 2018 (see Note 2).

In June 2018, under a Securities Purchase Agreement, the Company issued a 10% Convertible Promissory Note for principal borrowings of up to $58,000. The 10% convertible promissory note and all accrued interest are due in June 2019. The note is unsecured and bears interest at the rate of 10% per annum from the issuance date thereof until the notes are paid. The note holder has the right to convert beginning 180 days following the issuance date, the outstanding principal amount and accrued but unpaid interest into the Company’s common stock at a conversion price equal to 61% of the average of the lowest two trading prices of the Company’s common stock during the 20 trading days immediately preceding the conversion date. During the first 30 to 180 days following the date of the note, the Company has the right to prepay the principal and accrued but unpaid interest due under these notes, together with any other amounts that the Company may owe the holder under the terms of these notes, at a premium ranging from 115% to 140% as defined in the note agreements. After this initial 180-day period, the Company does not have a right to prepay the note. The Company paid original issuance cost and related loan fees of $3,000 in connection with this note payable which is being amortized over the term of the note. The Company granted the note holder 50,000 warrants in connection with the issuance of this note. The warrants had a term of 5 years from the date of grant and was exercisable at an exercise price of $0.40.

NOTE 7– CONVERTIBLE PROMISSORY NOTES (continued)

The Company accounted for the warrants by using the relative fair value method and recorded debt discount from the relative fair value of the warrants of $6,206 using a simple binomial lattice model (see Note 6). The Company has accounted for this convertible promissory note as stock settled debt under ASC 480 and in June 2018 recorded a debt premium liability of $37,082 and a charge to interest expense of $37,082. As of September 30, 2018, the principal balance of this note was $58,000.

For the year ended September 30, 2018, amortization of debt discounts related to all convertible promissory notes amounted to $204,217, which has been amortized to interest expense on the accompanying statements of operations. 

During the year ended September 30, 2018, the fair value of the derivative liabilities were estimated using the Binomial option pricing method with the following assumptions:

 At September 30, 2018 and 2017, the components of convertible promissory notes, net consisted of the following:

NOTE 8 - STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

Preferred Stock

The Company has 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock authorized. Preferred stock may be issued in one or more series. The Company’s board of directors is authorized to issue the shares of preferred stock in such series and to fix from time to time before issuance thereof the number of shares to be included in any such series and the designation, powers, preferences and relative, participating, optional or other rights, and the qualifications, limitations or restrictions thereof, of such series. No shares of preferred stock have been issued as of September 30, 2018 and 2017.

Common Stock

Between October 2016 and March 2017, the Company issued 571,900 of shares of common stock for cash of $115,258.

Effective August 1, 2016, the Company entered into a twelve month consulting agreement (the “Consulting Agreement”) with an investor relations firm for investor relations services. In connection with this consulting agreement, the Company shall compensate the consultant for services rendered 1) cash of $2,000 per month for the first three months then $2,500 per month thereafter and 2) Monthly restricted stock for consulting and services fees paid in advance of services each month to consultant will be $6,000 per month; Such fee will be calculated and valued at the lower of the trailing 5-day volume-weighted average price or the closing price on the last day of each month. On October 1, 2016, the Company issued 40,000 shares of restricted stock to the consultant. The shares were valued at their fair value of $6,000 using the recent sale price of the common stock on the dates of grant of $0.15 per common share.

NOTE 8 - STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (continued)

On January 23, 2017, the Company issued 160,000 shares of restricted stock to this consultant for services that covered from November 2016 through February 2017. The shares were valued at their fair value of $30,400 using the most recent sale price on October 27, 2016 of the common stock on the dates of grant of $0.19 per common share. Additionally, on March 10, 2017, the Company issued 300,001 shares of restricted stock to this consultant for services covering from March 2017 through July 2017. The shares were valued at their fair value of $51,000 using the most recent sale price on March 9, 2017 of the common stock on the dates of grant of $0.17 per common share.

In aggregate, in connection with the issuance of common shares to this consultant, during the year ended September 30, 2017, the Company recognized consulting fees of $87,400.

In connection with various consulting agreements, on March 3, 2017 and March 6, 2017, the Company issued 8,545,000 vested shares of restricted stock to eight consultants for business development services covering from March 2017 through September 2017. The shares were valued on the grant dates at their fair value of $1,623,550 using the most recent sale price on October 27, 2016 of the common stock of $0.19 per common share. During the year ended September 30, 2017, the Company recognized stock based compensation of $1,623,550 related to these consulting agreements.

On March 23, 2017, the Company issued 120,000 shares of restricted stock to a consultant for accounting services covering from January 2017 through December 2017. The shares were valued at their fair value of $24,000 using the most recent sale price on March 21, 2017 of the common stock on the dates of grant of $0.20 per common share. During the year ended September 30, 2017, the Company recognized stock based compensation of $18,000 and prepaid expense of $6,000 to be amortized over the remaining service period.

On February 27, 2017, in connection with Director Agreements, the Company issued 15,000,000 shares of restricted stock to the Company’s CEO /Director and issued 500,000 shares of restricted common stock to a director. The 15,500,000 shares of common stock are considered fully vested on the date of grant. The shares were valued at their fair value of $2,945,000 using the most recent sale price on October 27, 2016 of the common stock on the dates of grant of $0.19 per common share. During the year ended September 30, 2017, the Company recognized stock based compensation of $2,945,000 on these fully vested shares as there were no forfeiture provision in accordance with ASC 718.

On May 2, 2017, the Company issued 190,000 shares of restricted stock in connection with a two-year software licensing agreement. The shares were valued at their fair value of $38,000 using the most recent sale price of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant of $0.20 per common share. In connection with the issuance of these shares, the Company recorded an intangible asset of $38,000 which was being amortized over the license term until it was deemed fully impaired on September 30, 2017.

On May 23, 2017, in connection with Director Agreements, the Company issued 500,000 shares of restricted stock to a director of the Company. The shares were valued at their fair value of $100,000 using the most recent sale price of the common stock on the dates of grant of $0.20 per common share. During the year ended September 30, 2017, the Company recognized stock based compensation of $100,000 on these fully vested shares as there were no forfeiture provision in accordance with ASC 718.

On June 21, 2017, the Company issued 117,500 shares of restricted stock in connection with system development services. The shares were valued at their fair value of $23,500 using the most recent sale price of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant of $0.20 per common share. In connection with the issuance of these shares, during the year ended September 30, 2017, the Company reduced accrued expenses by $23,500.

NOTE 8 - STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (continued)

On February 13, 2018, in connection with a contract agreement, the Company issued 300,000 shares of restricted stock to a consultant. The shares were valued on the date of grant at their fair value of $105,000, or $0.35 per share, using the closing quoted trading price of the Company’s common stock on February 13, 2018 which was recorded as a prepaid asset to be recognized through the 7 ½ month term of the agreement, ended September 30, 2018. The Company recognized consulting fees of $105,000 as of September 30, 2018.

Between April 2018 and September 2018, the Company issued an aggregate of 885,000 shares of the Company’s common stock to note holders with contractual conversion prices ranging from $0.01 to $0.04 to convert $3,023 in principal amount with $6,952 of accrued and unpaid interest and $3,500 of conversion fees, totaling $13,475 (see note 7). The shares were valued at their fair value of $59,707 using the closing quoted trading price of the Company’s common stock on the date of grants ranging from $0.02 to $0.29 per common share. The Company recorded loss on debt extinguishment of $41,481 during the year ended September 30, 2018 in connection with the conversion of the notes.

Stock Warrants

In June 2018, the Company granted a note holder 50,000 warrants in connection with the issuance of a convertible note. The warrants have a term of 5 years from the date of grant and are exercisable at an exercise price of $0.40. The Company accounted for the warrants by using the relative fair value method. The Company recorded debt discount resulting from the relative fair value of the warrants of $6,206 using a simple binomial lattice model with the following assumptions: stock price at date of grant of $0.18, exercise price of $0.40, dividend yield of zero, years to maturity of 5, a risk free rate of 2.80%, and expected volatility of 473%. The debt discount is being amortized over the term of the convertible note (see Note 7).

NOTE 9 – DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS

The remaining assets and liabilities of discontinued operations are presented in the balance sheets under the caption “Assets of discontinued operations” and “Liabilities of discontinued operations” which relates to the operations of the online payment processing services. The carrying amounts of the major classes of these assets and liabilities as of September 30, 2018 and 2017 are summarized as follows:

NOTE 9 – DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS (continued)

The following table sets forth for the years ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, indicated selected financial data of the Company’s discontinued operations of its online payment processing services.

NOTE 10 - INCOME TAXES

The Company maintains deferred tax assets and liabilities that reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes. The net deferred tax asset has been fully offset by a valuation allowance because of the uncertainty of the attainment of future taxable income. The Company did not have an income tax provision or benefit for the year ended September 30, 2018 or 2017. The Company has incurred losses and therefore has provided a full valuation allowance against net deferred tax assets as of September 30, 2018 and 2017.

The Company does not have any uncertain tax positions or events leading to uncertainty in a tax position. The Company’s 2015, 2016 and 2017 Corporate Income Tax Returns are subject to Internal Revenue Service examination.

The items accounting for the difference between income taxes at the effective statutory rate and the provision for income taxes for the year ended September 30, 2018 and 2017 were as follows:

The Company’s approximate net deferred tax assets as of September 30, 2018 and 2017 were as follows:

NOTE 10 - INCOME TAXES (continued)

On December 22, 2017, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the “Act”) was signed into law. The Act decreases the U.S. corporate federal income tax rate from a maximum of 35% to a flat 21% effective January 1, 2018. The impact of the re-measurement on the Corporation’s net deferred tax asset, as of September 30, 2018, was an approximately $135,000 decrease in deferred tax assets, with a corresponding decrease in the Company’s valuation allowance, and no impact on income tax expense. The Act also includes a number of other provisions including, among others, the elimination of net operating loss carrybacks and limitations on the use of future losses, the repeal of the Alternative Minimum Tax regime and the repeal of the domestic production activities deduction. These provisions are not expected to have a material effect on the Corporation. Given the significant complexity of the Act and anticipated additional implementation guidance from the Internal Revenue Service, further implications of the Act may be identified in future periods.

At September 30, 2018, the Company had U.S. net operating loss carryforwards of $752,942 for income tax purposes, which expire in varying amounts through 2037. The amount of any benefit from the Company’s U.S. tax net operating losses is dependent on: (1) its ability to generate future taxable income, and (2) the unexpired amount of net operating loss carryforwards available to offset amounts payable on such taxable income. Any change in ownership greater than fifty percent under IRC section 382 places significant annual limitations on the use of the Company’s U.S. net operating losses to offset any future taxable U.S. income that may be generated. The valuation allowance increased (decreased) by ($28,027) and $104,676 for the periods ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively.  

NOTE 11 – COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

From time to time, we may become involved in various lawsuits and legal proceedings, which arise, in the ordinary course of business. However, litigation is subject to inherent uncertainties, and an adverse result in these or other matters may arise from time to time that may harm our business. We are currently not aware of any such legal proceedings or claims that we believe will have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or operating results.

NOTE 12 – SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

Between October 4, 2018 and November 29, 2018, the Company issued an aggregate of 9,180,000 shares of the Company’s common stock to note holders with contractual conversion prices ranging from $0.001 to $0.01 to convert $13,134 in principal amount with $6,848 of accrued and unpaid interest and $3,000 of conversion fees, totaling $22,982. The shares were valued at their fair value of $137,490 using the closing quoted trading price of the Company’s common stock on the date of grants ranging from $0.01 to $0.03 per common share. The Company recorded loss on debt extinguishment of $114,508 in connection with the conversion of the notes.