GlassBridge Enterprises, Inc. - Quarter Report: 2008 June (Form 10-Q)
Table of Contents
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
þ | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2008
or
o | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For
the transition period from to
Commission File Number: 1-14310
IMATION CORP.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware | 41-1838504 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of | (I.R.S. Employer | |
incorporation or organization) | Identification No.) | |
1 Imation Way | ||
Oakdale, Minnesota | 55128 | |
(Address of principal executive offices) | (Zip Code) |
(651) 704-4000
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Not Applicable
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer,
a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.
See the definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer þ | Accelerated filer o | Non-accelerated filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as
of the latest practicable date: 37,641,274 shares of Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share, were
outstanding at July 30, 2008.
IMATION CORP.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PAGE | ||||||||
3 | ||||||||
4 | ||||||||
5 | ||||||||
6 | ||||||||
20 | ||||||||
21 | ||||||||
31 | ||||||||
31 | ||||||||
32 | ||||||||
32 | ||||||||
33 | ||||||||
33 | ||||||||
34 | ||||||||
34 | ||||||||
34 | ||||||||
35 | ||||||||
36 | ||||||||
37 | ||||||||
Awareness Letter | ||||||||
Section 302 Certification | ||||||||
Section 302 Certification | ||||||||
Section 906 Certification | ||||||||
Section 906 Certification |
Table of Contents
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements.
IMATION CORP.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In millions, except per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In millions, except per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | 2008 | 2007 | |||||||||||||
Net revenue |
$ | 547.0 | $ | 412.8 | $ | 1,077.9 | $ | 834.7 | ||||||||
Cost of goods sold |
452.1 | 340.3 | 884.3 | 680.4 | ||||||||||||
Gross profit |
94.9 | 72.5 | 193.6 | 154.3 | ||||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative expense |
72.7 | 44.7 | 144.6 | 89.9 | ||||||||||||
Research and development expense |
6.0 | 9.6 | 12.6 | 22.0 | ||||||||||||
Restructuring and other expense |
4.0 | 20.8 | 4.7 | 21.4 | ||||||||||||
Total |
82.7 | 75.1 | 161.9 | 133.3 | ||||||||||||
Operating income (loss) |
12.2 | (2.6 | ) | 31.7 | 21.0 | |||||||||||
Other (income) and expense |
||||||||||||||||
Interest income |
(0.7 | ) | (2.5 | ) | (1.6 | ) | (5.0 | ) | ||||||||
Interest expense |
0.3 | 0.3 | 1.0 | 0.6 | ||||||||||||
Other expense, net |
2.0 | 1.5 | 3.4 | 2.2 | ||||||||||||
Total |
1.6 | (0.7 | ) | 2.8 | (2.2 | ) | ||||||||||
Income (loss) before income taxes |
10.6 | (1.9 | ) | 28.9 | 23.2 | |||||||||||
Income tax provision (benefit) |
3.4 | (0.5 | ) | 10.7 | 8.9 | |||||||||||
Net income (loss) |
$ | 7.2 | $ | (1.4 | ) | $ | 18.2 | $ | 14.3 | |||||||
Earnings (loss) per common share |
||||||||||||||||
Basic |
$ | 0.19 | $ | (0.04 | ) | $ | 0.48 | $ | 0.41 | |||||||
Diluted |
0.19 | (0.04 | ) | 0.48 | 0.41 | |||||||||||
Weighted average shares outstanding |
||||||||||||||||
Basic |
37.4 | 34.9 | 37.6 | 34.9 | ||||||||||||
Diluted |
37.5 | 34.9 | 37.7 | 35.3 | ||||||||||||
Cash dividend paid per common share |
$ | 0.16 | $ | 0.16 | $ | 0.32 | $ | 0.30 |
The accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these statements.
3
Table of Contents
IMATION CORP.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In millions)
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In millions)
June 30, | December 31, | |||||||
2008 | 2007 | |||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||
Current assets |
||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 117.7 | $ | 135.5 | ||||
Accounts receivable, net |
394.7 | 507.1 | ||||||
Inventories, net |
346.3 | 366.1 | ||||||
Other current assets |
111.8 | 109.9 | ||||||
Total current assets |
970.5 | 1,118.6 | ||||||
Property, plant and equipment, net |
163.1 | 171.5 | ||||||
Intangible assets, net |
366.5 | 371.0 | ||||||
Goodwill |
60.7 | 55.5 | ||||||
Other assets |
36.2 | 34.4 | ||||||
Total assets |
$ | 1,597.0 | $ | 1,751.0 | ||||
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
||||||||
Current liabilities |
||||||||
Accounts payable |
$ | 287.1 | $ | 350.1 | ||||
Accrued payroll |
15.8 | 13.5 | ||||||
Other current liabilities |
197.2 | 257.3 | ||||||
Current maturities of long-term debt |
| 10.0 | ||||||
Total current liabilities |
500.1 | 630.9 | ||||||
Other liabilities |
44.8 | 45.0 | ||||||
Long-term debt, less current maturities |
| 21.3 | ||||||
Commitments and contingencies
|
||||||||
Shareholders equity |
1,052.1 | 1,053.8 | ||||||
Total liabilities and shareholders equity |
$ | 1,597.0 | $ | 1,751.0 | ||||
The
accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these statements.
4
Table of Contents
IMATION CORP.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In millions)
(Unaudited)
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In millions)
(Unaudited)
Six Months Ended | ||||||||
June 30, | ||||||||
2008 | 2007 | |||||||
Cash Flows from Operating Activities: |
||||||||
Net income |
$ | 18.2 | $ | 14.3 | ||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: |
||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
25.3 | 21.0 | ||||||
Stock-based compensation |
4.6 | 7.9 | ||||||
Excess tax benefits from exercise of stock options |
| (0.2 | ) | |||||
Deferred income taxes |
2.2 | 0.8 | ||||||
Non-cash restructuring and other charges |
| 2.8 | ||||||
Other |
(0.2 | ) | 1.8 | |||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
||||||||
Accounts receivable |
126.2 | 29.4 | ||||||
Inventories |
29.0 | (33.1 | ) | |||||
Other assets |
0.5 | (3.9 | ) | |||||
Accounts payable |
(75.0 | ) | (8.5 | ) | ||||
Accrued payroll and other liabilities |
(52.5 | ) | (16.8 | ) | ||||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
78.3 | 15.5 | ||||||
Cash Flows from Investing Activities: |
||||||||
Acquisitions, net of cash acquired |
(15.0 | ) | 5.5 | |||||
Acquisition of minority interest |
(8.0 | ) | | |||||
Capital expenditures |
(6.5 | ) | (9.4 | ) | ||||
Other, net |
0.1 | (0.2 | ) | |||||
Net cash used in by investing activities |
(29.4 | ) | (4.1 | ) | ||||
Cash Flows from Financing Activities: |
||||||||
Debt repayment |
(31.3 | ) | | |||||
Purchase of treasury stock |
(26.4 | ) | (17.8 | ) | ||||
Dividend payments |
(12.0 | ) | (10.5 | ) | ||||
Exercise of stock options |
0.4 | 5.8 | ||||||
Excess tax benefits from exercise of stock options |
| 0.2 | ||||||
Net cash used in financing activities |
(69.3 | ) | (22.3 | ) | ||||
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents |
2.6 | 1.1 | ||||||
Net change in cash and cash equivalents |
(17.8 | ) | (9.8 | ) | ||||
Cash and cash equivalents beginning of period |
135.5 | 252.5 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents end of period |
$ | 117.7 | $ | 242.7 | ||||
The accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these statements.
5
Table of Contents
IMATION CORP.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Note 1 Basis of Presentation
The interim Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements of Imation Corp. (Imation, the
Company, we, us or our) are unaudited but, in the opinion of management, reflect all adjustments
necessary for a fair statement of financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the
periods presented. Except as otherwise disclosed herein, these adjustments consist of normal,
recurring items. The results of operations for any interim period are not necessarily indicative of
full year results. The Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes are presented in
accordance with the requirements for Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and do not contain certain
information included in our annual Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes.
The preparation of the interim Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to
make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the interim Condensed Consolidated
Financial Statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting periods.
Despite our intention to establish accurate estimates and use reasonable assumptions, actual
results may differ from our estimates.
The December 31, 2007 Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet data was derived from the audited
Consolidated Financial Statements but does not include all disclosures required by accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America. This Form 10-Q should be read in
conjunction with our Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes included in our Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007.
Note 2 Weighted Average Basic and Diluted Shares Outstanding
Basic earnings per share is calculated using the weighted average number of shares outstanding
during the period. Diluted earnings per share is computed on the basis of the weighted average
basic shares outstanding plus the dilutive effect of our stock-based compensation plans using the
treasury stock method. The following table sets forth the computation of the weighted average
basic and diluted shares outstanding:
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||||
(In millions) | 2008 | 2007 | 2008 | 2007 | ||||||||||||
Weighted average number of shares outstanding during the period |
37.4 | 34.9 | 37.6 | 34.9 | ||||||||||||
Dilutive effect of stock-based compensation plans |
0.1 | | 0.1 | 0.4 | ||||||||||||
Weighted average number of diluted shares outstanding during the period |
37.5 | 34.9 | 37.7 | 35.3 | ||||||||||||
Options to purchase approximately 3,627,000, and 3,313,000 shares for the three and six month
periods ended June 30, 2008, respectively, were anti-dilutive and, therefore, were not included in
the computation of diluted shares outstanding. Options to purchase approximately 1,522,000 and
643,000 shares for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2007, respectively, were
anti-dilutive and, therefore, were not included in the computation of diluted shares outstanding.
Note 3 Fair Value Measurements
In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (SFAS 157), which is effective for
fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007 and for interim periods within those years. This
statement defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands the
related disclosure requirements. This statement applies under other accounting pronouncements that
require or permit fair value measurements. SFAS 157 establishes a three-tier fair value hierarchy,
which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value. These tiers include: Level 1, defined as
observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets; Level 2, defined as inputs other than
quoted prices in active markets that are either directly or indirectly observable; and Level 3,
defined as unobservable inputs in which little or no market data exists, therefore requiring an
entity to develop its own assumptions. SFAS 157 defines fair value based upon an exit price model.
6
Table of Contents
In February 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (FSP) 157-1, Application of FASB
Statement No. 157 to FASB Statement No. 13 and Other Accounting Pronouncements That Address Fair
Value Measurements for Purposes of Lease Classification or Measurement under Statement 13 (FSP
157-1) and 157-2, Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157 (FSP 157-2). FSP 157-1 amends SFAS 157
to exclude SFAS No. 13, Accounting for Leases, and its related interpretive accounting
pronouncements that address leasing transactions, while FSP 157-2 delays the effective date of the
application of SFAS 157 to fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008 for all nonfinancial
assets and liabilities that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements
on a nonrecurring basis. The aspects that have been deferred by FSP FAS 157-2 will be effective
for the Company beginning January 1, 2009. We are currently evaluating the impact of this standard
on our Consolidated Financial Statements.
Effective January 1, 2008, we adopted SFAS 157 for all financial instruments and nonfinancial
instruments accounted for at fair value on a recurring basis as required.
As of June 30, 2008, we held derivative instruments that are required to be measured at fair
value on a recurring basis. Our derivative instruments consist of foreign currency forwards, option
contracts and option combination strategies. The fair value of our derivative instruments is
determined based on inputs that are readily available in the public market or can be derived from
information available in publicly quoted markets (Level 1).
Our financial assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis at
June 30, 2008, were as follows:
Quoted prices in | ||||||||||||||||
active markets | Significant | |||||||||||||||
for identical | other observable | Unobservable | ||||||||||||||
June 30, | assets | inputs | inputs | |||||||||||||
(In millions) | 2008 | (Level 1) | (Level 2) | (Level 3) | ||||||||||||
Derivative assets |
$ | 0.1 | $ | 0.1 | $ | | $ | | ||||||||
Derivative liabilities |
(2.2 | ) | (2.2 | ) | | | ||||||||||
Total |
$ | (2.1 | ) | $ | (2.1 | ) | $ | | $ | | ||||||
Net realized losses on derivative instruments of $0.6 and $1.2 million were recognized in the
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations during the three and six month periods ended June
30, 2008. The amount of net deferred losses on foreign currency cash flow hedges included in the
accumulated other comprehensive loss in shareholders equity as of June 30, 2008 was $2.7 million,
pre-tax, which, depending on market factors, is expected to reverse or be recognized in the
Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations in 2008.
Note 4 Business Combinations
Xtreme Accessories, LLC
On June 30, 2008, we acquired substantially all of the assets of Xtreme Accessories, LLC
(XtremeMac), a Florida-based product design and marketing firm focused on consumer electronic
products and accessories. The purchase price was $7.3 million, consisting of a cash payment of $7.0
million and $0.3 million of direct acquisition costs.
We may pay additional cash consideration of up to $10 million payable over a three-year period,
contingent on future financial performance of the acquired business.
The preliminary purchase price allocation resulted in goodwill of $4.8 million. The following
table illustrates our preliminary allocation of the purchase price to the assets acquired and
liabilities assumed:
(In millions) | Amount | |||
Inventory |
$ | 1.4 | ||
Accounts receivable |
0.1 | |||
Fixed assets |
0.2 | |||
Intangibles |
4.8 | |||
Goodwill |
4.8 | |||
Accounts payable |
(4.0 | ) | ||
$ | 7.3 | |||
7
Table of Contents
Our allocation of the purchase price to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed resulted
in the recognition of the following intangible assets:
Weighted | ||||||||
Average | ||||||||
(In millions) | Amount | Life | ||||||
Trade names |
$ | 2.0 | 12 years | |||||
Intellectual property |
1.8 | 12 years | ||||||
Customer Relationships |
0.8 | 4 years | ||||||
Non-compete |
0.2 | 3 years | ||||||
$ | 4.8 | |||||||
The effects of the acquisition are not expected to materially impact our 2008 results of
operations. Therefore, pro forma disclosures are not included.
A final determination of fair values from the acquisition may differ materially from the
preliminary estimates presented above and will include managements final valuation of the fair
values of assets acquired and liabilities assumed as well as a final determination of any related
restructuring charges. This final valuation, which is expected by the end of 2008, will be based on
the actual net tangible assets that existed as of the date of the acquisition. The final valuation
may change the allocation of the purchase price, which could affect the fair value assigned to the
assets and liabilities.
Imation Corporation Japan
On March 16, 2008, we completed the acquisition of the 40 percent minority interest in Imation
Corporation Japan (ICJ). The purchase price for the acquisition was $8.0 million, which was paid in
cash. The transaction was accounted for using the step acquisition method prescribed by Accounting
Research Bulletin No. 51, Consolidated Financial Statements. The step acquisition method requires
the allocation of the excess purchase price to the fair value of net assets acquired. The excess
purchase price is determined as the difference between the cash paid and the historical book value
of the interest in net assets acquired.
The following table presents the excess purchase price over historical book value:
(In millions) | Amount | |||
Cash consideration |
$ | 8.0 | ||
Interest acquired in historical book value of ICJ |
(7.1 | ) | ||
Excess purchase price over historical book value |
$ | 0.9 | ||
The following table summarizes the allocation of the excess purchase price over historical
book value arising from the acquisition:
(In millions) | Amount | |||
Customer relationships |
$ | 0.8 | ||
Inventory |
0.1 | |||
Goodwill |
0.4 | |||
Deferred tax liability |
(0.4 | ) | ||
Excess purchase price over historical book value |
$ | 0.9 | ||
The weighted average life of the customer relationships intangible asset is six years. The
effects of the acquisition are not expected to materially impact our 2008 results of
operations. Therefore, pro forma disclosures are not included.
TDK Recording Media
On July 31, 2007, we completed the acquisition of substantially all of the assets relating to
the marketing, distribution, sales, customer service and support of removable recording media
products, accessory products and ancillary products under the TDK Life on Record brand name (TDK
Recording Media), from TDK Corporation, a Japanese corporation (TDK), pursuant to an acquisition
agreement dated April 19, 2007, between Imation and TDK (the TDK Acquisition Agreement). As
provided in the TDK Acquisition Agreement, we acquired substantially all of the assets of TDK
Recording Media operations, including the assets or capital stock of certain of TDKs operating
subsidiaries engaged in TDK Recording Media operations, and use of the TDK Life on Record brand
name for current and future recording media products including magnetic tape, optical media, flash
media and accessories.
8
Table of Contents
In conjunction with the acquisition, we issued to TDK approximately 6.8 million shares of
Imation common stock, representing 16.6 percent of the shares then outstanding after the issuance
of the shares to TDK, valued at $216.7 million and paid $54.9 million in cash to TDK for a total of
$271.6 million. We may pay additional cash consideration of up to $70 million to TDK, contingent on
future financial performance of the acquired business. Additional cash consideration, if paid, will
be recorded as additional goodwill.
The TDK Acquisition Agreement provided for a future purchase price adjustment related to the
target working capital amount at the date of acquisition. During the first quarter of 2008 we
reached an agreement with TDK on the closing date working capital amount resulting in a required
additional payment to TDK of $6.5 million which was paid during the second quarter of 2008. The
required additional payment to TDK was $3.7 million less than the previous estimate of the
additional liability. The favorable adjustment to the estimated purchase price was allocated to our
reporting units in a manner consistent with the initial allocation of the purchase price. As a
result of the finalization of the purchase price and additional direct acquisition costs, goodwill
decreased by $1.2 million. For those reporting units where we previously incurred a goodwill
impairment charge, income of $2.3 million was recorded in Restructuring and Other Expense during
the first quarter of 2008 due to the adjustment to the purchase consideration originally allocated
to these reporting units.
Memcorp
On July 9, 2007, we completed the acquisition of certain assets of Memcorp, Inc., a Florida
corporation, and Memcorp Asia Limited, a corporation organized under the laws of Hong Kong
(together Memcorp, subsidiaries of Hopper Radio of Florida, Inc., a Florida corporation), pursuant
to an asset purchase agreement dated as of May 7, 2007. We acquired the assets of Memcorp used in
or relating to the sourcing and sale of consumer electronic products, principally sold under the
Memorex brand name, including inventories, equipment and other tangible personal property and
intellectual property. The acquisition also included existing brand licensing agreements, including
Memcorps agreement with MTV Networks, a division of Viacom International, to design and distribute
specialty consumer electronics under certain Nickelodeon character-based properties and the NPower
brand.
The purchase price for the acquisition was $70.3 million including three-year promissory notes
in the aggregated amount of $37.5 million. This purchase price excludes the cost of integration, as
well as other indirect costs related to the transaction. An earn-out payment may be paid three
years after closing of up to $20 million, dependent on financial performance of the purchased
business. Additional cash consideration, if paid, will be recorded as additional goodwill.
We had the option to prepay the three-year promissory notes at any time. In the first quarter
of 2008, we repaid all outstanding promissory notes in the amount of $31.3 million.
Pro Forma Disclosure
The following unaudited pro forma financial information illustrates our quarterly results of
operations as if the acquisitions of the TDK Recording Media and Memcorp businesses had occurred on
January 1, 2007:
Three Months | Six Months | |||||||
Ended | Ended | |||||||
(In millions, except per share amounts) | June 30, 2007 | June 30, 2007 | ||||||
Net revenue |
$ | 580.0 | $ | 1,209.3 | ||||
Net income |
(9.3 | ) | 8.2 | |||||
Earnings per common share |
||||||||
Basic |
$ | (0.22 | ) | $ | 0.20 | |||
Diluted |
$ | (0.22 | ) | $ | 0.20 |
The pro forma operating results are presented for comparative purposes only. They do not
represent the results that would have been reported had the acquisitions occurred on the dates
assumed, and they are not necessarily indicative of future operating results.
Memorex International Inc.
On April 28, 2006, we closed on the acquisition of substantially all of the assets of Memorex
International Inc. (Memorex), including the Memorex brand name and the capital stock of its
operating subsidiaries engaged in the business of the design, development, sourcing, marketing,
distribution and sale of hardware, media and accessories used for the storage of electronic data
under the Memorex brand name.
9
Table of Contents
Memorexs product portfolio includes recordable CDs and DVDs, branded
accessories, USB flash drives and magnetic and optical drives.
The cash purchase price for the acquisition was $329.3 million, after net asset adjustments
were made to the original purchase price of $330.0 million. This amount excludes the cost of
integration, as well as other indirect costs related to the transaction. Certain price adjustments
were finalized post-closing. During the second quarter of 2007 we paid $2.5 million related to the
minimum additional cash consideration. During the second quarter of 2008 we paid the remaining $2.5
million related to the minimum additional cash consideration. We may be required to pay additional
cash consideration up to a maximum of $40 million on June 1, 2009, contingent on financial
performance of the purchased business.
Note 5 Supplemental Balance Sheet Information
June 30, | December 31, | |||||||
(In millions) | 2008 | 2007 | ||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||
Accounts Receivable |
||||||||
Accounts receivable |
$ | 427.1 | $ | 535.4 | ||||
Less allowances |
(32.4 | ) | (28.3 | ) | ||||
Accounts receivable, net |
$ | 394.7 | $ | 507.1 | ||||
Inventories |
||||||||
Finished goods |
$ | 296.4 | $ | 308.7 | ||||
Work in process |
29.1 | 34.7 | ||||||
Raw materials and supplies |
20.8 | 22.7 | ||||||
Total inventories, net |
$ | 346.3 | $ | 366.1 | ||||
Other Current Assets |
||||||||
Deferred income taxes |
$ | 55.1 | $ | 53.1 | ||||
Other |
56.7 | 56.8 | ||||||
Total other current assets |
$ | 111.8 | $ | 109.9 | ||||
Property, Plant and Equipment |
||||||||
Property, plant and equipment |
$ | 517.8 | $ | 542.6 | ||||
Less accumulated depreciation |
(354.7 | ) | (371.1 | ) | ||||
Property, plant and equipment, net |
$ | 163.1 | $ | 171.5 | ||||
Other Assets |
||||||||
Deferred income taxes |
$ | 15.9 | $ | 14.9 | ||||
Other |
20.3 | 19.5 | ||||||
Total other assets |
$ | 36.2 | $ | 34.4 | ||||
10
Table of Contents
June 30, | December 31, | |||||||
(In millions) | 2008 | 2007 | ||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||
Other Current Liabilities |
||||||||
Rebates |
$ | 81.8 | $ | 104.0 | ||||
Employee separation costs |
13.6 | 23.9 | ||||||
Income taxes |
13.4 | 18.2 | ||||||
Other |
88.4 | 111.2 | ||||||
Total other current liabilities |
$ | 197.2 | $ | 257.3 | ||||
Other Liabilities |
||||||||
Pension |
$ | 9.9 | $ | 7.7 | ||||
Deferred income taxes |
6.7 | 2.5 | ||||||
Other |
28.2 | 34.8 | ||||||
Total other liabilities |
$ | 44.8 | $ | 45.0 | ||||
Note 6 Intangible Assets and Goodwill
The breakdown of intangible assets as of June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007 was as follows:
Customer | ||||||||||||||||||||
(In millions) | Trade Names | Software | Relationships | Other | Total | |||||||||||||||
June 30, 2008 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Cost |
$ | 334.1 | $ | 56.5 | $ | 63.5 | $ | 11.9 | $ | 466.0 | ||||||||||
Accumulated amortization |
(17.6 | ) | (54.3 | ) | (18.1 | ) | (9.5 | ) | (99.5 | ) | ||||||||||
Net |
$ | 316.5 | $ | 2.2 | $ | 45.4 | $ | 2.4 | $ | 366.5 | ||||||||||
December 31, 2007 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Cost |
$ | 330.0 | $ | 54.6 | $ | 60.9 | $ | 8.8 | $ | 454.3 | ||||||||||
Accumulated amortization |
(12.2 | ) | (52.7 | ) | (12.8 | ) | (5.6 | ) | (83.3 | ) | ||||||||||
Net |
$ | 317.8 | $ | 1.9 | $ | 48.1 | $ | 3.2 | $ | 371.0 | ||||||||||
The changes in the carrying value of goodwill by segment are as follows:
Electronic | ||||||||||||||||
(In millions) | Americas | Asia Pacific | Products | Total | ||||||||||||
Balance as of December 31,
2007 |
$ | 9.5 | $ | 12.4 | $ | 33.6 | $ | 55.5 | ||||||||
TDK post-closing purchase
price adjustment |
(0.1 | ) | (1.1 | ) | | (1.2 | ) | |||||||||
Purchase of ICJ minority
interest |
| 0.4 | | 0.4 | ||||||||||||
Purchase of XtremeMac |
4.8 | 4.8 | ||||||||||||||
Foreign exchange impact |
| 1.2 | | 1.2 | ||||||||||||
Balance as of June 30, 2008 |
$ | 9.4 | $ | 12.9 | $ | 38.4 | $ | 60.7 | ||||||||
Note 7 Stock-Based Compensation
We have stock options outstanding under our 1996 Employee Stock Incentive Program (Employee
Plan) and our 1996 Directors Stock Compensation Program (Directors Plan). We have stock options and
restricted stock outstanding under our 2000 Stock Incentive Plan (2000 Incentive Plan), our 2005
Stock Incentive Plan (2005 Incentive Plan) and our 2008 Stock Incentive Plan (2008 Incentive Plan),
collectively, the Stock Plans. We also have restricted stock units outstanding under our 2005 Stock
Incentive Plan. No further shares are available for grant under the Employee Plan, Directors
Plan, 2000 Incentive Plan or the 2005 Incentive Plan.
11
Table of Contents
The 2008 Incentive Plan was approved and adopted by our shareholders on May 7, 2008 and became
effective immediately. The 2008 Incentive Plan permits grants of stock options, stock appreciation
rights, restricted stock, restricted stock units, dividend equivalents, performance awards, stock
awards and other stock-based awards (collectively, Awards). The Companys Board of Directors and
Compensation Committee have the authority to determine the type of Award as well as the amount,
terms and conditions of each Award under the 2008 Incentive Plan, subject to the limitations and
other provisions of the 2008 Incentive Plan. The total number of shares of common stock that may be
issued or granted under the 2008 Incentive Plan may not exceed 4.0 million, of which the maximum
number of shares that may be provided pursuant to grants of Awards other than options and stock
appreciation rights is 2.0 million. The number of shares available for Awards, as well as the terms
of outstanding Awards, are subject to adjustment as provided in the 2008 Incentive Plan for stock
splits, stock dividends, recapitalization and other similar events. The outstanding options are
non-qualified and normally have a term of ten years. For employees, the options generally become
exercisable and restricted stock vests 25 percent per year beginning on the first anniversary of
the grant date. For directors, the options generally become exercisable and restricted stock vests
in full on the first anniversary of the grant date. Exercise prices are equal to the fair market
value of our common stock on the date of grant. Awards may be granted under the 2008 Incentive Plan
until May 6, 2018 or until all shares available for Awards under the 2008 Incentive Plan have been
purchased or acquired; provided, however, that incentive stock options may not be granted after
March 11, 2018. As a result of the approval and adoption of the 2008 Incentive Plan in May 2008, no
further shares are available for grant under the 2005 Incentive Plan. As of June 30, 2008, there
were 3,698,171 shares available for grant under our 2008 Incentive Plan.
Total stock-based compensation expense recognized in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of
Operations associated with the Stock Plans for the three months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 was
$2.0 million and $4.9 million, respectively, and for the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007
was $4.6 million and $7.9 million, respectively. Stock-based compensation expense for the three and
six months ended June 30, 2007 included expense of $2.2 million recorded in restructuring and other
charges related to a terminated employment agreement.
Stock Options
The following table summarizes our stock option activity for the six months ended June 30,
2008:
Weighted | ||||||||
Stock | Average | |||||||
Options | Exercise Price | |||||||
Outstanding December 31, 2007 |
3,149,761 | $ | 35.16 | |||||
Granted |
1,218,013 | 24.45 | ||||||
Exercised |
(41,330 | ) | 18.42 | |||||
Forfeited |
(141,425 | ) | 37.28 | |||||
Outstanding June 30, 2008 |
4,185,019 | $ | 32.15 | |||||
Exercisable as of June 30, 2008 |
2,301,972 | $ | 34.44 | |||||
The weighted average grant-date fair value of options that were granted during the six months
ended June 30, 2008 was $5.99. The total intrinsic value of stock options exercised during the six
months ended June 30, 2008 was $273,000. As of June 30, 2008, there was $14.4 million of total
unrecognized compensation expense related to non-vested stock options granted under our Stock
Plans. That expense is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 2.89 years.
Note 8 Retirement Plans
Employer Contributions
During the six months ended June 30, 2008, we contributed approximately $1.1 million to our
pension plans. We presently anticipate contributing additional amounts of approximately $4 million
to $5 million to fund our pension plans in 2008.
12
Table of Contents
Components of Net Periodic Pension Cost
United States | International | United States | International | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Three Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(In millions) | 2008 | 2007 | 2008 | 2007 | 2008 | 2007 | 2008 | 2007 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Service cost |
$ | 1.6 | $ | 1.5 | $ | 0.2 | $ | 0.2 | $ | 3.2 | $ | 3.5 | $ | 0.4 | $ | 0.2 | ||||||||||||||||
Interest cost |
1.8 | 1.9 | 1.0 | 0.9 | 3.6 | 3.7 | 1.9 | 1.7 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Expected return on plan assets |
(2.2 | ) | (2.5 | ) | (1.1 | ) | (1.1 | ) | (4.4 | ) | (4.9 | ) | (2.1 | ) | (1.9 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Amortization of unrecognized items |
| 0.1 | | | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net periodic pension cost |
$ | 1.2 | $ | 1.0 | $ | 0.1 | $ | | $ | 2.5 | $ | 2.4 | $ | 0.3 | $ | 0.1 | ||||||||||||||||
Curtailment |
| 1.4 | | | | 1.4 | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total pension costs |
$ | 1.2 | $ | 2.4 | $ | 0.1 | $ | | $ | 2.5 | $ | 3.8 | $ | 0.3 | $ | 0.1 | ||||||||||||||||
Note 9 Restructuring and Other Expense
The components of our restructuring and other expense included in the Condensed Consolidated
Statements of Operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 were as follows:
Three Months | Six Months | |||||||
Ended | Ended | |||||||
(In millions) | June 30, 2008 | June 30, 2008 | ||||||
Restructuring |
||||||||
Severance and severance-related expense |
$ | 2.5 | $ | 3.6 | ||||
Lease termination costs |
1.9 | 3.5 | ||||||
Total restructuring |
4.4 | 7.1 | ||||||
TDK post-closing purchase price adjustment |
| (2.3 | ) | |||||
Other |
(0.4 | ) | (0.1 | ) | ||||
Total |
$ | 4.0 | $ | 4.7 | ||||
During the second quarter of 2008, we recorded severance and severance-related costs of $2.5
million for personnel reductions at our Anaheim distribution center
and in Europe. We also recorded lease
termination costs of $1.2 million related to the early termination of our existing lease
agreement for our TDK office space in Germany and $0.7 million
related to unutilized office space in California associated with a
prior restructuring program. During the first quarter of 2008, we recorded severance and
severance-related costs of $1.1 million for personnel reductions primarily in Europe and lease
termination costs of $1.6 million related to the full settlement of a leased office space no longer
utilized in the United Kingdom. The majority of the severance and severance-related costs are
expected to be paid during the remainder of 2008.
The TDK post-closing purchase price adjustment is associated with the finalization of certain
acquisition-related working capital amounts as negotiated with TDK as set forth in Note 4 herein.
2007 Cost Reduction Restructuring Program
The following tables summarize the restructuring activity related to our 2007 cost reduction
restructuring program which began in the second quarter of 2007.
Changes in the 2007 cost reduction restructuring accruals during the six months ended June 30,
2008 were as follows:
Balance as of | Balance as of | |||||||||||||||
December 31, | Additional | June 30, | ||||||||||||||
(In millions) | 2007 | Charges | Usage | 2008 | ||||||||||||
Severance and other liability |
$ | 13.6 | $ | 1.1 | $ | (7.5 | ) | $ | 7.2 |
13
Table of Contents
On a cumulative basis through June 30, 2008, the status of the 2007 cost reduction restructuring
accruals was as follows:
Initial | Liability as of | |||||||||||||||
Program | Additional | Cumulative | June 30, | |||||||||||||
(In millions) | Amounts | Charges | Usage | 2008 | ||||||||||||
Severance and other liability |
$ | 15.1 | $ | 7.3 | $ | (15.2 | ) | $ | 7.2 |
Initial | Balance as of | |||||||||||||||
Headcount | Cumulative | June 30, | ||||||||||||||
Amounts | Additions | Reductions | 2008 | |||||||||||||
Total employees affected |
675 | 160 | (587 | ) | 248 |
TDK Recording Media Restructuring Costs
The following tables summarize the restructuring activity related to TDK Recording Media which
began in the third quarter of 2007.
Changes in the TDK Recording Media restructuring accruals during the six months ended June 30,
2008 were as follows:
Balance as of | Balance as of | |||||||||||||||||||
December 31, | Additional | Currency | June 30, | |||||||||||||||||
(In millions) | 2007 | Charges | Impacts | Usage | 2008 | |||||||||||||||
Severance and other liability |
$ | 9.4 | $ | 2.3 | $ | 0.5 | $ | (5.8 | ) | $ | 6.4 | |||||||||
Lease termination costs |
| 1.2 | | (0.1 | ) | $ | 1.1 |
On a cumulative basis through June 30, 2008, the status of the TDK Recording Media
restructuring accruals was as follows:
Initial | Liability as of | |||||||||||||||||||
Program | Additional | Currency | Cumulative | June 30, | ||||||||||||||||
(In millions) | Amounts | Charges | Impacts | Usage | 2008 | |||||||||||||||
Severance and other liability |
$ | 11.7 | $ | 2.3 | $ | 0.5 | $ | (8.1 | ) | $ | 6.4 | |||||||||
Lease termination costs |
| 1.2 | | (0.1 | ) | 1.1 |
Initial | Balance as of | |||||||||||||||
Headcount | Cumulative | June 30, | ||||||||||||||
Amounts | Additions | Reductions | 2008 | |||||||||||||
Total employees affected |
172 | 40 | (134 | ) | 78 |
Note
10 Taxes
We file income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction and various states and foreign
jurisdictions. The Internal Revenue Service commenced an examination of one of our U.S.
subsidiarys (Memorex Products Inc.) federal income tax
returns for the year ended March 31, 2006 and a stub period ended April 30, 2006. Some state
and foreign jurisdiction tax years remain open to examination for years before 2006; however, we
believe any additional assessments for years before 2006 will not be material to our consolidated
financial statements.
Taxes collected from customers and remitted to governmental authorities that were included in
revenue in the three months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 were $21.0 million and $11.2 million,
respectively. Taxes collected from customers and remitted to governmental authorities that were
included in revenue in the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 were $40.6 million and $24.5
million, respectively.
14
Table of Contents
Note
11 Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss consisted of the following:
June 30, | December 31, | |||||||
(In millions) | 2008 | 2007 | ||||||
Cumulative currency translation adjustment |
$ | (25.9 | ) | $ | (40.0 | ) | ||
Pension adjustments, net of income tax |
(4.3 | ) | (4.4 | ) | ||||
Cash flow hedging and other, net of income tax |
(1.3 | ) | 0.3 | |||||
Total accumulated other comprehensive loss |
$ | (31.5 | ) | $ | (44.1 | ) | ||
Comprehensive income for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2008 and 2007
consisted of the following:
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||||
(In millions) | 2008 | 2007 | 2008 | 2007 | ||||||||||||
Net income (loss) |
$ | 7.2 | $ | (1.4 | ) | $ | 18.2 | $ | 14.3 | |||||||
Currency translation adjustment |
(1.3 | ) | 7.6 | 14.1 | 14.9 | |||||||||||
Pension liability adjustments, net of income tax |
0.1 | 6.7 | 0.1 | 6.5 | ||||||||||||
Cash flow hedging and other, net of income tax |
2.5 | (0.1 | ) | (1.6 | ) | (0.7 | ) | |||||||||
Total comprehensive income |
$ | 8.5 | $ | 12.8 | $ | 30.8 | $ | 35.0 | ||||||||
Note
12 Segment Information
Our data storage media business is organized, managed and internally and externally reported
as segments differentiated by the regional markets we serve: Americas, Europe and Asia Pacific.
Each of these segments has responsibility for selling virtually all Imation product lines except
for consumer electronic products. Consumer electronics are sold primarily through our new
Electronic Products (EP) segment. The EP segment is currently focused primarily in North America
and primarily under the Memorex brand name.
We evaluate segment performance based on net revenue and operating income. Net revenue for
each segment is generally based on customer location where the product is shipped. The operating
income reported in our segments excludes corporate and other unallocated amounts. Although such
amounts are excluded from the business segment results, they are included in reported consolidated
earnings. Corporate and unallocated amounts include research and development expense, corporate
expense, stock-based compensation expense and restructuring and other expenses which are not
allocated to the segments.
Net revenue and operating income (loss) were as follows:
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||||
(In millions) | 2008 | 2007 | 2008 | 2007 | ||||||||||||
Net Revenue |
||||||||||||||||
Americas |
$ | 190.2 | $ | 229.4 | $ | 404.9 | $ | 444.5 | ||||||||
Europe |
185.3 | 126.7 | 361.4 | 269.4 | ||||||||||||
Asia Pacific |
113.3 | 56.7 | 227.6 | 120.8 | ||||||||||||
Electronic Products |
58.2 | | 84.0 | | ||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 547.0 | $ | 412.8 | $ | 1,077.9 | $ | 834.7 | ||||||||
15
Table of Contents
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||||
(In millions) | 2008 | 2007 | 2008 | 2007 | ||||||||||||
Operating Income (Loss) |
||||||||||||||||
Americas |
$ | 17.5 | $ | 22.1 | $ | 41.3 | $ | 46.6 | ||||||||
Europe |
7.2 | 7.9 | 12.9 | 19.0 | ||||||||||||
Asia Pacific |
8.0 | 4.0 | 15.7 | 10.4 | ||||||||||||
Electronic Products |
0.6 | | (2.1 | ) | | |||||||||||
Corporate and unallocated |
(21.1 | ) | (36.6 | ) | (36.1 | ) | (55.0 | ) | ||||||||
Total |
$ | 12.2 | $ | (2.6 | ) | $ | 31.7 | $ | 21.0 | |||||||
Corporate and unallocated amounts above include restructuring and other expense of $4.0
million and $20.8 million for the three months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
Corporate and unallocated amounts above include restructuring and other expense of $4.7 million and
$21.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
We have four major product categories: optical, magnetic, flash media, and electronic
products, accessories and other. Net revenue by product category was as follows:
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||||
(In millions) | 2008 | 2007 | 2008 | 2007 | ||||||||||||
Net Revenue |
||||||||||||||||
Optical products |
$ | 264.3 | $ | 192.6 | $ | 525.9 | $ | 385.3 | ||||||||
Magnetic products |
166.4 | 150.4 | 344.5 | 312.8 | ||||||||||||
Flash media products |
27.0 | 42.8 | 53.9 | 78.5 | ||||||||||||
Electronic products,
accessories and other |
89.3 | 27.0 | 153.6 | 58.1 | ||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 547.0 | $ | 412.8 | $ | 1,077.9 | $ | 834.7 | ||||||||
Note 13 Litigation, Commitments and Contingencies
Litigation
In the normal course of business, we periodically enter into agreements that incorporate
general indemnification language. Performance under these indemnities would generally be triggered
by a breach of terms of the contract or by a third-party claim. There have historically been no
material losses related to such indemnifications. In accordance with SFAS No. 5, Accounting for
Contingencies, we record a liability in our consolidated financial statements for these actions
when a loss is known or considered probable and the amount can be reasonably estimated.
We are the subject of various pending or threatened legal actions in the ordinary course of
our business. All such matters are subject to many uncertainties and outcomes that are not
predictable with assurance. Consequently, as of June 30, 2008, we are unable to ascertain the
ultimate aggregate amount of any monetary liability or financial impact that we may incur with
respect to these matters. While these matters could materially affect operating results depending
upon the final resolution in future periods, it is our opinion that after final disposition, except
for possibly the Philips dispute described below, any monetary liability beyond that provided in
the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as of June 30, 2008 would not be material to our financial
position.
Moser Baer India Ltd. (MBI) has made a claim for indemnification of its legal expenses
incurred with respect to the Philips litigation described below. We are currently reviewing this
claim to determine the extent of our obligations under the relevant agreements with MBI.
Philips
Imation filed a Declaratory Judgment Action on October 27, 2006, in Federal District Court in
St. Paul, Minnesota requesting that the court resolve an ongoing dispute with Philips Electronics
N.V., U.S. Philips Corporation and North American Philips Corporation (collectively, Philips).
Philips has asserted that (1) the patent cross-license between 3M Company and Philips was not
validly assigned to Imation in connection with the spin-off of Imation from 3M Company in 1996; (2)
Imations 51 percent owned subsidiary, Global Data Media (GDM), is not a subsidiary as defined in
the cross-license; (3) the coverage of the cross-license does not apply to Imations acquisition of
Memorex; (4) the cross-license does not apply to DVD discs; (5) certain Philips patents that are
not covered by the cross-license are infringed by Imation; and (6) as a result, Imation owes
Philips royalties for the prior and future sales of CD and DVD discs.
16
Table of Contents
We believe that these
allegations are without merit and filed a Declaratory Judgment Action to have a court reaffirm
Imations rights under the cross-license. On February 26, 2007, the parties signed a Standstill
Agreement and the litigation was voluntarily dismissed without prejudice. Imation and Philips held
settlement negotiations but were unable to come to an agreement. Imation re-filed its Declaratory
Judgment Action on August 10, 2007. Philips filed its Answer and Counterclaims against Imation and
MBI, Imations partner in GDM. Philips alleged that (1) the cross-license does not apply to
companies that Imation purchased or created after March 1, 2000; (2) GDM is not a legitimate
subsidiary of Imation; (3) Imations formation of GDM is a breach of the cross-license resulting in
termination of the cross-license at that time; (4) Imation (including Memorex and GDM) infringes
various patents that would otherwise be licensed under the cross-license; and (5) Imation
(including Memorex and GDM) infringes one or more patents that are not covered by the
cross-license. Philips claimed damages of $655 million plus interest and costs, as well as a claim requesting a trebling of that amount.
Imation was aware of these claims prior to filing its Declaratory Judgment Action. Imation believed
then and continues to believe that Philips claims are without merit.
On October 30, 2007, Imation filed its answers to Philips counterclaims and a Motion for
Partial Summary Judgment on the issue of whether the patent cross-license was validly assigned by
3M Company to Imation. Philips did not contest Imations Motion and on November 26, 2007, the
parties filed a stipulation affirming that the cross-license was validly assigned to Imation.
On April 7, 2008, Philips amended its counterclaims to (1) add claims that DVD discs sold by
Imation infringe its patents, and (2) withdraw its specific claim of $655 million in damages in
favor of the more general damages in an amount to be proved at trial.
Imation, Philips and MBI participated in a series of court-ordered settlement discussions in
June 2008 and plan to continue such discussions. Discovery will continue in parallel with such
discussions. Trial is currently scheduled for fall 2009.
SanDisk
On July 11, 2007, SanDisk Corporation filed a patent infringement action in U.S. District
Court, Northern District of California, against Imation and its subsidiary, Memorex Products, Inc.
This action alleged that we have infringed a patent held by SanDisk (U.S. Patent 5,602,987) by
offering and selling USB flash drives. On September 6, 2007, SanDisk voluntarily withdrew its
lawsuit without prejudice.
On October 24, 2007, SanDisk Corporation filed another patent infringement action in U.S.
District Court, Western District of Wisconsin, against Imation and its subsidiaries, Imation
Enterprises Corp. and Memorex Products, Inc. The lawsuit also names over twenty other companies as
defendants. This action alleges that we have infringed five patents held by SanDisk: US Patent
6,426,893; 6,763,424; 5,719,808; 6,947,332 and 7,137,011. SanDisk alleges that our sale of various
flash memory products, such as USB flash drives and certain flash card formats, infringes these
patents and is seeking damages for prior sales, and an injunction and/or royalties on future sales.
This action has been stayed pending resolution of the related case described below.
Also on October 24, 2007, SanDisk filed a complaint with the United States International Trade
Commission (ITC) against the same Imation entities listed above, as well as over twenty other
companies. This action involves the same patents and the same products as described above and
SanDisk is seeking an order from the ITC blocking the defendants importation of these products
into the United States. On January 9, 2008, Imation filed its response to the complaint. Discovery
is ongoing and all remaining issues continue to be in dispute. Because some of our suppliers are
already licensed by SanDisk and we are generally indemnified by our suppliers against claims for
patent infringement, at this time we do not believe these actions will have a material adverse
impact on our financial statements.
Note 14 Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In May 2008, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 162, The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles,
(SFAS 162) to set forth levels of authority for various types of accounting standards (the GAAP
hierarchy). The current GAAP hierarchy, as set forth in the AICPA Statement on Auditing Standards
69 (SAS 69), has been criticized in the past because 1) it is directed to auditors rather than
entities, 2) it is complex, and 3) it ranks FASB Statements of Financial Accounting Concepts, which
are subject to the same level of due process as FASB Statements of Financial Accounting Standards,
below industry practices that are widely recognized as generally accepted but are not subject to
due process.
17
Table of Contents
By moving the GAAP hierarchy into the accounting literature, SFAS 162 establishes that
decisions with respect to the GAAP hierarchy rest primarily with an entity not its auditor in
selecting accounting principles for financial statements that are presented in conformity with
GAAP. In order to fully shift the GAAP hierarchy from the auditing literature to the accounting
literature, the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) has released a final amendment to
their auditing standards, including SAS 69 noted above. The effective date of SFAS 162 will be 60
days after the SEC approves the PCAOBs amendments to the auditing standards. We have determined
that the adoption of SFAS 162 will not have a material impact on our consolidated financial
position, results of operations or cash flows.
On April 25, 2008, the FASB issued FSP SFAS No. 142-3, Determination of the Useful Life of
Intangible Assets, which amends the list of factors an entity should consider in developing renewal
or extension assumptions used in determining the useful life of recognized intangible assets under
SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. The new guidance applies to (1) intangible
assets that are acquired individually or with a group of other assets and (2) intangible assets
acquired in both business
combinations and asset acquisitions. We are required to adopt the FSP at the beginning of 2009
and for interim periods within that year. While the guidance on determining the useful life of a
recognized intangible asset must be applied prospectively only to intangible assets acquired after
the FSPs effective date, the disclosure requirements of the FSP must be applied prospectively to
all intangible assets recognized as of, and after, the FSPs effective date. Early adoption of the
FSP is prohibited. We are currently evaluating the impact of this standard on our Consolidated
Financial Statements.
In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and
Hedging Activities an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133 (SFAS 161). SFAS 161 requires
qualitative disclosures about objectives and strategies for using derivatives, quantitative
disclosures about fair value amounts of, and gains and losses on, derivative instruments, and
disclosures about credit-risk-related contingent features in derivative agreements. We are required
to adopt SFAS 161 effective at the beginning of 2009. We are currently evaluating the disclosure
implications of this statement.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141(R), Business Combinations (SFAS 141(R)), which
is a revision of SFAS No. 141, Business Combinations. SFAS 141(R) retains the fundamental
requirements in SFAS No. 141 that the acquisition method of accounting be used for all business
combinations and for an acquirer to be identified for each business combination. This statement
includes changes in the measurement of fair value of the assets acquired, the liabilities assumed
and any noncontrolling interest in the acquiree as of the acquisition date, with limited
exceptions. This statement requires in general that transaction costs and costs to restructure the
acquired company be expensed and contractual contingencies be recorded at their acquisition-date
fair values. We are required to adopt the new standard prospectively effective at the beginning of
2009. Early adoption of SFAS 141(R) is prohibited. We are currently evaluating the impact of this
standard on our Consolidated Financial Statements.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated
Financial Statements an amendment of ARB No. 51. This statement clarifies that a noncontrolling
interest in a subsidiary is an ownership interest in the consolidated entity that should be
reported as equity in the consolidated financial statements. This statement also changes the way
the consolidated income statement is presented. It requires consolidated net income to be reported
at amounts that include the amounts attributable to both the parent and the noncontrolling
interest, with disclosure on the face of the consolidated statement of income of the amounts of
consolidated net income attributable to the parent and the noncontrolling interest. We are required
to adopt the new standard effective at the beginning of 2009. We have determined that the adoption
of SFAS 160 will not have a material impact on our consolidated financial position, results of
operations or cash flows.
Note 15 Subsequent Event
On July 21, 2008, the Board of Directors approved the Companys restructuring plan for its
Camarillo, California plant as a further implementation of the Companys manufacturing strategy.
The Company will end manufacturing operations and exit its Camarillo plant by year-end 2008, and
will focus its manufacturing efforts on magnetic tape coating operations at its existing plant in
Weatherford, Oklahoma.
The plant closing will result in the elimination of approximately 140 positions by the end of
2008 out of a current worldwide total of 1,950. The Company anticipates it will incur up to $20
million in restructuring and related charges associated with the Camarillo closure, the majority of
which will occur in the second half of 2008. Approximately half of the charges will be non-cash
asset write-offs.
18
Table of Contents
The remaining half of the charges will be divided equally between cash payments
associated with severance benefits and costs of exiting the site.
Note 16 Review Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, our independent registered public accounting firm, has performed a
review of the unaudited interim Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included herein and
their report thereon accompanies this filing. This report is not a report within the meaning of
Sections 7 and 11 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and the independent registered public
accounting firms liability under Section 11 does not extend to it.
19
Table of Contents
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of Imation Corp.:
We have reviewed the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet of Imation Corp. and
its subsidiaries as of June 30, 2008, and the related condensed consolidated statements of
operations for each of the three-month and six-month periods ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 and the
condensed consolidated statements of cash flows for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2008 and
2007. These interim financial statements are the responsibility of the Companys management.
We conducted our review in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (United States). A review of interim financial information consists principally of
applying analytical procedures and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and
accounting matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance with
the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the objective of
which is the expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole.
Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.
Based on our review, we are not aware of any material modifications that should be made to the
accompanying condensed consolidated interim financial statements for them to be in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
We previously audited in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2007, and the
related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders equity and comprehensive income
(loss), and of cash flows for the year then ended (not presented herein), and in our report dated
February 29, 2008, we expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements
(our opinion contained an explanatory paragraph stating the Company changed the manner in which it
accounts for income taxes effective January 1, 2007). In our opinion, the information set forth in
the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2007, is fairly stated in
all material respects in relation to the consolidated balance sheet from which it has been derived.
/s/ | PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP | |||
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP | ||||
Minneapolis, Minnesota
August 1, 2008
August 1, 2008
20
Table of Contents
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
Overview
Imation Corp. is a leading global marketer of brands and developer of products in digital
storage, audio and video electronics and accessories. As used herein, the terms Imation,
Company, we, us or our mean Imation Corp. and its subsidiaries unless the context
indicates otherwise. We sell data storage products in approximately 100 countries around the world
and under several different brand names across multiple technology platforms or pillars
magnetic media, recordable optical media, solid state flash drives and removable hard drives. The
primary brand names are Imation, Memorex and TDK Life on Record. We also sell a range of consumer
video, audio and home electronic products, and accessories primarily in North America and primarily
under the Memorex brand name. Except for certain tape media formats, we do not manufacture the
products we sell and distribute. We provide unique product industrial designs, packaging and
merchandising and source these products from a variety of third party manufacturers.
The data storage removable media market presents an important market for Imation, as we hold
leading market shares in magnetic tape and optical media and have long-standing OEM, end-user customer
and channel relationships. We also have multiple brands, global coverage, proprietary tape formats
and a significant intellectual property portfolio, particularly in tape. This industry
presents several challenges. The market is highly competitive, characterized by continuing changes
in technology, ongoing variable price erosion, diverse distribution channels and a large variety of
brands and formats for tape, optical, flash and removable hard disk products.
The magnetic tape industry has consistently addressed the growth in demand for storage
capacity with higher capacity cartridges resulting in lower cost per gigabyte and lower overall
cartridge volume. Non-proprietary lower cost open format LTO tape continues to gain share with
legacy formats declining at an increasing rate. In the current economic environment, we have seen
this trend accelerate, especially among some of our enterprise class customers. Finally, lower cost
disk and optimization strategies such as virtual tape and de-duplication remain a factor in certain
sectors of the market. We expect our tape revenue and margins to continue to be under
pressure as these factors result in gradual decline in the size of the total tape media market over time.
Our recordable optical media product sales are primarily composed of CDs and DVDs sold
throughout the world under our brands (Imation, Memorex and TDK Life on Record) as well as under a
distribution agreement for the HP brand. We also have a majority interest in a sales and marketing
joint venture for optical media, named Global Data Media (GDM). While our different brands have
varying strengths in different regions of the world, in aggregate we have the leading overall
market share for optical media globally. While the overall market for CDs and DVDs is declining
somewhat as hard disk and flash media replace optical media in some applications (music and video
recording), we have continued to grow both optical revenue and market share through our
acquisitions. In addition, we sell Blu-ray recordable media as a new and emerging format targeted
at the recording of high definition video content. Our optical media products are sold through a
variety of retail consumer and commercial distribution channels and sourced from manufacturers in
Asia (primarily Taiwan and India).
Our flash media sales are primarily composed of USB flash drives sold through a variety of
retail consumer and commercial distribution channels around the world under our brands (Imation,
Memorex and TDK Life on Record) and sourced from manufacturers in Asia. The removable flash media
market is highly competitive with highly variable price swings driven by the balance between raw
chip capacity and demand in the much larger embedded flash market. Focused and efficient sourcing
and distribution are particularly critical elements for success in this market. In addition to USB
flash drives, we sell some flash cards and solid state drives.
We participate in the audio/video segment of the much larger consumer electronics (CE) market.
Products we sell include flat panel displays and televisions, iPod accessories and MP3 players,
clock radios, CD and DVD players, karaoke machines, digital picture frames and digital cameras. It
is a large and highly diverse market in terms of competitors and channels. We compete in mass
merchant channels for second tier brand preference primarily under the Memorex brand in North
America. The accessories market encompasses cases, cleaning and labeling products, cables and
connectors sold through retail outlets and distribution channels. Both CE products and accessories
are sourced from manufacturers throughout Asia.
We have taken several actions which have significantly increased our industry presence and
relevance in both commercial and consumer retail channels and markets globally. We continue to
retain our tape media business as a cornerstone of the Company while we broadened the scope of our
business. Our long-term strategy is built upon three key elements which we describe as optimize,
grow and extend.
| Optimize our magnetic tape business. The magnetic tape market remains an attractive market with growing demand for storage capacity across a substantial installed base of commercial information technology users, a relatively small number of competitors, and high barriers to entry. |
21
Table of Contents
Imation enjoys a leading market share, significant intellectual property portfolio, solid industry reputation and relationships among key original equipment manufacturers (OEMs). The magnetic tape industry has consistently addressed the growth in demand for storage capacity with higher capacity cartridges resulting in lower cost per gigabyte and lower overall cartridge volume. To optimize our magnetic tape business and stabilize or reduce our manufacturing costs, in May 2007 we started a major restructuring of our manufacturing operations. We announced further manufacturing optimization steps in July 2008 whereby we plan to focus our tape coating operations in our Weatherford, Oklahoma plant and close our Camarillo, California plant by year end. We are concentrating our direct manufacturing investments on coating operations and outsourcing other parts of manufacturing operations for magnetic tape. We continue to have a focused investment in tape technology and seek to maintain and extend value-added technology capabilities in key areas, including precision thin-film tape coating and servo-writing. |
| Grow the data storage media business across the four pillars of storage offering products under multiple brands. Over the years, we have brought to market recordable media products beyond magnetic tape, including recordable optical media, removable USB flash drives and flash cards, and external and removable hard disk products. We have also acquired additional brands, beyond the Imation brand, and established distribution agreements for other brands. In addition, with approximately 60 percent of our revenue coming from outside the United States for the six months ended June 30, 2008, we seek to leverage our global marketing and distribution capability in bringing products to market across multiple geographies. | ||
| Extend certain brands selectively across multiple product categories. We sell accessories and certain consumer electronic products, selectively, under multiple brands in various regions of the world. With the acquisition of the Memcorp business in the third quarter of 2007, we entered into the consumer electronics market to sell certain consumer electronic products primarily in North America, which we did not offer previously. Our product portfolio includes flat panel displays and televisions, iPod accessories, and MP3 players, clock radios, CD and DVD players, karaoke machines, digital picture frames and digital cameras. The Memcorp business acquisition also included a brand licensing agreement with MTV Networks, a division of Viacom International, to design and distribute consumer electronic items under certain Nickelodeon character-based properties and the NPower brands. |
Factors Affecting Comparability of our Financial Results
On July 9, 2007, we completed the acquisition of certain assets of Memcorp, Inc., a Florida
corporation, and Memcorp Asia Limited, a corporation organized under the laws of Hong Kong
(together Memcorp, subsidiaries of Hopper Radio of Florida, Inc., a Florida corporation), pursuant
to an Asset Purchase Agreement dated as of May 7, 2007. We acquired the assets of Memcorp used in
or relating to the sourcing and sale of consumer electronic products, principally sold under the
Memorex brand name, including inventories, equipment and other tangible personal property and
intellectual property. The acquisition also included existing brand licensing agreements, including
Memcorps agreement with MTV Networks, a division of Viacom International, to design and distribute
specialty consumer electronics under certain Nickelodeon character-based properties and the NPower
brand.
On July 31, 2007, we completed the acquisition of substantially all of the assets relating to
the marketing, distribution, sales, customer service and support of removable recording media
products, accessory products and ancillary products under the TDK Life on Record brand name (TDK
Recording Media), from TDK Corporation, a Japanese corporation (TDK), pursuant to an Acquisition
Agreement dated April 19, 2007 between Imation and TDK.
Memcorp and TDK Recording Media operating results are included in our condensed consolidated
results of operations from their respective dates of acquisition. For further information see Note
4 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
Executive Summary
Consolidated Results of Operations for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2008
| Revenue of $1,077.9 million in the six months ended June 30, 2008 was up 29.1 percent over the same period last year. | ||
| Operating income of $31.7 million in the six months ended June 30, 2008 was up 51.0 percent compared to $21.0 million in the same period last year. | ||
| Diluted earnings per share was $0.48 for the six months ended June 30, 2008 compared to $0.41 for the same period last year. |
22
Table of Contents
Cash Flow/Financial Condition for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2008
| Cash flow from operations totaled $78.3 million in the six months ended June 30, 2008 compared to $15.5 million during the same period last year. | ||
| Total cash and cash equivalents were $117.7 million as of June 30, 2008, compared to $135.5 million at year-end 2007. | ||
| Dividends of $0.16 per share were paid in June 2008. |
Results of Operations
Net Revenue
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||
June 30, | Percent | June 30, | Percent | |||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in millions) | 2008 | 2007 | Change | 2008 | 2007 | Change | ||||||||||||||||||
Net revenue |
$ | 547.0 | $ | 412.8 | 32.5 | % | $ | 1,077.9 | $ | 834.7 | 29.1 | % |
Our worldwide revenue growth for the three months ended June 30, 2008, compared to the same
period last year, was driven by overall volume increases of approximately 34 percent and a foreign
currency benefit of approximately six percent, partially offset by price declines of approximately
seven percent. The volume increases for the three months ended June 30, 2008, compared to the same
period last year, were driven by optical and consumer electronics product sales, primarily due to
the addition of TDK Recording Media and Memcorp incremental revenue which totaled $189.6 million.
Our revenue growth for the six months ended June 30, 2008, compared to the same period last year,
was driven by overall volume increases of approximately 31 percent and a foreign currency benefit
of approximately six percent, partially offset by price declines of approximately eight percent.
The volume increases for the six months ended June 30, 2008, compared to the same period last year,
were driven by optical and consumer electronics product sales, primarily due to the addition of TDK
Recording Media and Memcorp incremental revenue which totaled $352.1 million. Excluding
acquisitions, revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2008 from our magnetic products was down
due to declines in demand for entry level and mature data center tape formats; revenue from our
optical products was down in the Americas and Europe segments, and up in other regions of the
world; and revenue from our flash products was down due to our planned rationalization of our
exposure to the U.S. retail channel.
Gross Profit
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||
June 30, | Percent | June 30, | Percent | |||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in millions) | 2008 | 2007 | Change | 2008 | 2007 | Change | ||||||||||||||||||
Gross profit |
$ | 94.9 | $ | 72.5 | 30.9 | % | $ | 193.6 | $ | 154.3 | 25.5 | % | ||||||||||||
Gross margin |
17.3 | % | 17.6 | % | 18.0 | % | 18.5 | % |
Our gross margin as a percent of revenue was relatively unchanged for the three months ended
June 30, 2008, compared to the same period last year due to increased margins from optical
products, offset by changes in product mix. Our gross margin as a percent of revenue decreased
slightly for the six months ended June 30, 2008, compared to the same period last year, driven by
changes in our product mix and ongoing reduced gross profits in our legacy magnetic tape products.
Product mix changes are primarily due to the acquisitions of TDK Recording Media and Memcorp, which
sell products with lower gross margin percentages than our base magnetic tape business.
Selling, General and Administrative (SG&A)
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||
June 30, | Percent | June 30, | Percent | |||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in millions) | 2008 | 2007 | Change | 2008 | 2007 | Change | ||||||||||||||||||
Selling, general and
administrative |
$ | 72.7 | $ | 44.7 | 62.6 | % | $ | 144.6 | $ | 89.9 | 60.8 | % | ||||||||||||
As a percent of revenue |
13.3 | % | 10.8 | % | 13.4 | % | 10.8 | % |
The increase in SG&A expense for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2008, compared
to the same periods last year, was due to the addition of TDK Recording Media and Memcorp SG&A
expenses and intangible asset amortization, as well as spending for integrating the acquisitions,
legal costs related to the Phillips litigation, and incremental brand investments.
These items were
partially offset by synergies achieved from acquisition integration as well as spending declines
elsewhere.
23
Table of Contents
Research and Development (R&D)
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||
June 30, | Percent | June 30, | Percent | |||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in millions) | 2008 | 2007 | Change | 2008 | 2007 | Change | ||||||||||||||||||
Research and development |
$ | 6.0 | $ | 9.6 | -37.5 | % | $ | 12.6 | $ | 22.0 | -42.7 | % | ||||||||||||
As a percent of revenue |
1.1 | % | 2.4 | % | 1.2 | % | 2.6 | % |
The decrease in R&D expense for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2008, compared
to the same periods last year, was due to the result of savings from restructuring actions
initiated in the second quarter of 2007 as we focused our activities primarily on development of
new magnetic tape formats.
Restructuring and Other
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||
June 30, | Percent | June 30, | Percent | |||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in millions) | 2008 | 2007 | Change | 2008 | 2007 | Change | ||||||||||||||||||
Restructuring and other |
$ | 4.0 | $ | 20.8 | -80.8 | % | $ | 4.7 | $ | 21.4 | -78.0 | % | ||||||||||||
As a percent of revenue |
| % | 5.0 | % | | % | 2.6 | % |
During the three months ended June 30, 2008, we recorded restructuring charges of $4.0 million
related to our previously announced restructuring programs, including severance and
severance-related costs of $2.5 million and lease termination costs of $1.9 million. Restructuring
and other expense of $0.7 million recorded during the first quarter of 2008 related mainly to
restructuring charges of $2.7 million offset by income of $2.3 million associated with the TDK
post-closing purchase price adjustment. The TDK post-closing purchase price adjustment is
associated with the finalization of certain acquisition-related working capital amounts as
negotiated with TDK as set forth in Note 4 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
Restructuring and other expense of $21.4 million recorded for the six months ended June 30,
2007 included $16.9 million of restructuring costs related to our cost reduction program which
began in the second quarter of 2007, $3.1 million for a terminated employment agreement and asset
impairments of $1.4 million.
Operating Income (Loss)
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||
June 30, | Percent | June 30, | Percent | |||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in millions) | 2008 | 2007 | Change | 2008 | 2007 | Change | ||||||||||||||||||
Operating income (loss) |
$ | 12.2 | $ | (2.6 | ) | NM | $ | 31.7 | $ | 21.0 | 51.0 | % | ||||||||||||
As a percent of revenue |
2.2 | % | -0.6 | % | 2.9 | % | 2.5 | % |
NM Not Meaningful |
The increase in operating income for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2008,
compared to the same periods last year, was mainly due to lower restructuring and other charges,
partially offset by reduced profitability in our legacy magnetic tape products.
Income Tax Provision (Benefit)
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||
June 30, | Percent | June 30, | Percent | |||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in millions) | 2008 | 2007 | Change | 2008 | 2007 | Change | ||||||||||||||||||
Income tax provision (benefit) |
$ | 3.4 | $ | (0.5 | ) | NM | $ | 10.7 | $ | 8.9 | 20.2 | % | ||||||||||||
Effective tax rate |
32.1 | % | 26.3 | % | 37.0 | % | 38.3 | % |
NM Not Meaningful |
The tax rate increased for the three months ended June 30, 2008 compared to same the period
last year, which included tax benefits associated with restructuring and other charges during 2007.
24
Table of Contents
Segment Results
Our data storage media business is organized, managed and internally and externally reported
as segments differentiated by the regional markets we serve: Americas, Europe and Asia Pacific.
Each of these segments has responsibility for selling virtually all Imation product lines except
for consumer electronic products. Consumer electronics are sold primarily through our new
Electronic Products (EP) segment. The EP segment is currently focused primarily in North America
and primarily under the Memorex brand name.
We evaluate segment performance based on net revenue and operating income. Net revenue for
each segment is generally based on customer location where the product is shipped. The operating
income reported in our segments excludes corporate and other unallocated amounts. Although such
amounts are excluded from the business segment results, they are included in reported consolidated
earnings. Corporate and unallocated amounts include research and development expense, corporate
expense, stock-based compensation expense and restructuring and other expenses which are not
allocated to the segments.
Information related to our segments is as follows:
Americas
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||
June 30, | Percent | June 30, | Percent | |||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in millions) | 2008 | 2007 | Change | 2008 | 2007 | Change | ||||||||||||||||||
Net revenue |
$ | 190.2 | $ | 229.4 | -17.1 | % | $ | 404.9 | $ | 444.5 | -8.9 | % | ||||||||||||
Operating income |
17.5 | 22.1 | -20.8 | % | 41.3 | 46.6 | -11.4 | % | ||||||||||||||||
As a percent of revenue |
9.2 | % | 9.6 | % | 10.2 | % | 10.5 | % |
The Americas segment is our largest segment comprising 34.8 percent of our total revenue for
the three months ended June 30, 2008 and 37.6 percent of our total revenue for the six months ended
June 30, 2008. For the three months ended June 30, 2008, the net revenue decrease compared to the
same period last year was driven primarily by lower revenues from our flash, magnetic and to a
lesser degree optical products, partially offset by incremental revenue of $23.3 million from the
TDK Recording Media acquisition. For the six months ended June 30, 2008, the net revenue decrease
compared to the same period last year was driven by lower revenue from our magnetic, optical and
flash products, partially offset by incremental revenue of $50.7 million associated with the TDK
Recording Media acquisition.
Operating income as a percentage of revenue for the three and six month periods ended June 30,
2008 for our Americas segment remained fairly consistent as compared to the same periods last year.
Europe
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||
June 30, | Percent | June 30, | Percent | |||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in millions) | 2008 | 2007 | Change | 2008 | 2007 | Change | ||||||||||||||||||
Net revenue |
$ | 185.3 | $ | 126.7 | 46.3 | % | $ | 361.4 | $ | 269.4 | 34.1 | % | ||||||||||||
Operating income |
7.2 | 7.9 | -8.9 | % | 12.9 | 19.0 | -32.1 | % | ||||||||||||||||
As a percent of revenue |
3.9 | % | 6.2 | % | 3.6 | % | 7.1 | % |
The Europe segment revenue comprised 33.9 percent of our total revenue for the three months
ended June 30, 2008 and 33.5 percent of our total revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2008.
For the three months ended June 30, 2008, the net revenue increase compared to the same period last
year was driven by incremental revenue of $52.1 million from the TDK Recording Media acquisition,
mostly in our optical and audio video products. For the six months ended June 30, 2008, the net
revenue increase compared to the same period last year was driven by incremental revenue from the
TDK Recording Media acquisition of $112.4 million, again mostly in our optical and audio video
products.
The decrease in operating income for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2008,
compared to the same periods last year, was driven mainly by lower sales and gross profits in our
magnetic products.
25
Table of Contents
Asia Pacific
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||
June 30, | Percent | June 30, | Percent | |||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in millions) | 2008 | 2007 | Change | 2008 | 2007 | Change | ||||||||||||||||||
Net revenue |
$ | 113.3 | $ | 56.7 | 99.8 | % | $ | 227.6 | $ | 120.8 | 88.4 | % | ||||||||||||
Operating income |
8.0 | 4.0 | 100.0 | % | 15.7 | 10.4 | 51.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||
As a percent of revenue |
7.1 | % | 7.1 | % | 6.9 | % | 8.6 | % |
The Asia Pacific segment revenue comprised 20.7 percent of our total revenue for the three
months ended June 30, 2008 and 21.1 percent of our total revenue for the six months ended June 30,
2008. For the three months ended June 30, 2008, the net revenue increase compared to the same
period last year was driven by incremental revenue of $54.3 million from the TDK Recording Media
acquisition, mostly in our optical products. For the six months ended June 30, 2008, the net
revenue increase compared to the same period last year was driven by incremental revenue from the
TDK Recording Media acquisition of $103.3 million, again mostly in our optical products.
The decrease in operating income as a percentage of revenue for the six months ended June 30,
2008 for our Asia Pacific segment was driven by higher SG&A costs associated with the TDK Recording
Media acquisition in advance of acquisition integration.
Electronic Products
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||
June 30, | Percent | June 30, | Percent | |||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in millions) | 2008 | 2007 | Change | 2008 | 2007 | Change | ||||||||||||||||||
Net revenue |
$ | 58.2 | $ | | NM | $ | 84.0 | $ | | NM | ||||||||||||||
Operating income |
0.6 | | NM | (2.1 | ) | | NM | |||||||||||||||||
As a percent of revenue |
NM | % | NM | % |
NM Not Meaningful |
The Electronic Products segment comprised 10.6 percent of our total revenue for the three
months ended June 30, 2008 and 7.8 percent of our total revenue for the six months ended June 30,
2008. This operating segment is the result of the Memcorp business acquisition in July 2007. This
segment experiences seasonality associated with consumer channels which means that the majority of
the
net revenue and operating income for this segment is expected to occur in the second half of
the year with a greater concentration in the fourth quarter.
Corporate and Unallocated
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||
June 30, | Percent | June 30, | Percent | |||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in millions) | 2008 | 2007 | Change | 2008 | 2007 | Change | ||||||||||||||||||
Operating costs |
$ | 21.1 | $ | 36.6 | -42.3 | % | $ | 36.1 | $ | 55.0 | -34.4 | % |
Corporate and unallocated amounts include research and development expense, corporate expense,
stock-based compensation expense and restructuring and other expense that are not allocated to the
segments. The decreased operating costs for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 compared
to the same periods last year, were attributed to higher restructuring and other expenses in 2007.
Impact of Changes in Foreign Currency Rates
We have a market presence in more than 100 countries and we sell products on a local currency
basis through a variety of distribution channels. We source optical, flash and other finished goods
from manufacturers located primarily in Asia, although much of this sourcing is on a U.S. dollar
basis. Further, we produce a significant portion of our magnetic tape products in our own
manufacturing facilities in the United States. Comparisons of revenue and gross profit from foreign
countries are subject to various fluctuations due to the impact of translating results at differing
exchange rates in different periods.
Changes in foreign currency exchange rates in each of the three and six months ended June 30,
2008 positively impacted worldwide revenue by approximately six percent compared with the same
periods of 2007. The impact on profit is more difficult to determine due to the influence of other
factors that we believe are also impacted by currency rate changes, including the translation
impact on local offsetting expense and pricing declines that tend to offset translation benefits
over time.
26
Table of Contents
Our foreign currency hedging program attempts to manage some of the foreign currency risks
over near term periods; however, these risk management activities cannot ensure that the program
will offset more than a portion of the adverse financial impact resulting from unfavorable
movements in foreign exchange rates or that medium and longer term effects of exchange rates will
not be significant (see Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk in
this Form 10-Q).
Financial Position
As of June 30, 2008, our cash and cash equivalents balance was $117.7 million, a decrease of
$17.8 million from $135.5 million as of December 31, 2007. We had operating cash flow of $78.3
million. The decrease in cash and cash equivalents was due to the repayment of the Memcorp
promissory notes of $31.3 million, repurchase of common stock of $26.4 million, dividend payments
of $12.0 million, cash paid for minority interest acquisition of $8.0 million, cash paid for the
XtremeMac acquisition of $7.0 million, cash paid for capital expenditures of $6.5 million, and cash
paid for the TDK working capital settlement of $6.5 million.
As of June 30, 2008 our receivables balance was $394.7 million, a decrease of $112.4 million
as of December 31, 2007. The decrease was due to the seasonable nature of our sales and
collections. Accounts receivable days sales outstanding was 61 days as of June 30, 2008, down 3
days from December 31, 2007. Days sales outstanding is calculated using the count-back method,
which calculates the number of days of most recent revenue that is reflected in the net accounts
receivable balance. Days of inventory supply was 66 days as of June 30, 2008, up 1 day from
December 31, 2007. Days of inventory supply is calculated using the current period inventory
balance divided by the average of the inventoriable portion of cost of goods sold for the previous
12 months, expressed in days.
Accounts payable was $287.1 million as of June 30, 2008, compared with $350.1 million as of
December 31, 2007. The decrease in accounts payable was due to lower purchasing levels as well as
payments made during the second quarter of 2008.
Other current liabilities were $197.2 million as of June 30, 2008 compared with $257.3 million
as of December 31, 2007. The decrease was mainly due to lower accrued rebates, lower acquisition
related liabilities, lower foreign levies payable and payments made under our restructuring plans.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Cash provided by operating activities of $78.3 million in the six months ended June 30, 2008
was driven by net income as adjusted for non-cash items of $50.1 million and changes in our
operating assets and liabilities which provided cash of $28.2 million. Cash provided by operating
activities of $15.5 million in the six months ended June 30, 2007 was driven by net income as
adjusted for non-cash items of $48.4 million partially offset by cash used for working capital
changes. Cash provided by operating activities increased mainly due to the seasonable impacts
related to the collection of receivables.
Cash used in investing activities was $29.4 million in the six months ended June 30, 2008
compared with $4.1 million in the six months ended June 30, 2007. Investing activities for the six
months ended June 30, 2008 included payment for the acquisition of a minority interest of $8.0
million, payment for the acquisition of XtremeMac of $7.0 million, payment for the TDK working
capital settlement of $6.5 million, capital spending of $6.5 million, and payment for the Memorex
earn-out of $2.5 million. Investing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2007 included
capital spending of $9.4 million partially offset by a net receipt of $5.5 million settlement
related to post-closing purchase price adjustments associated with the acquisition of Memorex.
Cash used in financing activities of $69.3 million in the six months ended June 30, 2008
included payment of $31.3 million to repay the Memcorp promissory notes, repurchase of common stock
of $26.4 million and dividend payments of $12.0 million. Cash used in financing activities of $22.3
million in the six months ended June 30, 2007 included repurchase of common stock of $17.8 million
and dividend payments of $10.5 million, partially offset by cash inflows of $5.8 million related to
the exercise of stock options.
On March 30, 2006, we entered into a credit agreement with a group of banks that were party to
a prior credit agreement, extending the expiration date from December 15, 2006 to March 29, 2011.
This credit agreement was amended on July 24, 2007 and the following changes were made to the
credit agreement (as amended, the Credit Agreement): (i) increased the credit facility from $300
million to $325 million and added an option to increase the facility to $400 million at a future
date; (ii) extended the term for an additional year to March 29, 2012; (iii) permitted the
Companys acquisition of the TDK Recording Media business; (iv) increased the guarantee of foreign
obligations limit and letter of credit sub-limit; (v) modified the fixed charge coverage ratio
definition and (vi) reduced the applicable interest rates. The Credit Agreement provides for
revolving credit, including letters of credit. An amendment on April 25, 2008 formally expanded the
types of letters of credit available under the Agreement. Borrowings under the amended Credit
Agreement bear interest, at our option, at either: (a) the higher of the federal funds rate plus
0.50 percent or the rate of interest published by Bank of America as its prime rate plus, in each
case, up to an additional 0.50 percent depending on the applicable leverage ratio,
as described
below, or (b) the British Bankers Association LIBOR, adjusted by the reserve percentage in effect
from time to time, as determined by the Federal Reserve Board, plus up to 0.95 percent depending on
the applicable leverage ratio.
27
Table of Contents
Leverage ratio is defined as the ratio of total debt to EBITDA. A
facility fee ranging from 0.125 to 0.250 percent per annum based on our consolidated leverage ratio
is payable on the revolving line of credit. The Credit Agreement contains covenants, which are
customary for similar credit arrangements, and contains financial covenants that require us to have
a leverage ratio not exceeding 2.5 to 1.0 and a fixed charge coverage ratio (defined as the ratio
of EBITDA less capital expenditures to interest expenses and income taxes actually paid) not less
than 2.5 to 1.0. We do not expect these covenants to materially restrict our ability to borrow
funds in the future. No borrowings were outstanding and we complied with all covenants under the
Credit Agreement as of June 30, 2008.
In connection with the Memcorp acquisition which closed on July 9, 2007, we issued promissory
notes totaling $37.5 million payable to Hopper Radio of Florida, Inc., a Florida corporation,
Memcorp, Inc., a Florida corporation, and Memcorp Asia Limited, a corporation organized under the
laws of Hong Kong (together, the Sellers). Promissory note payments totaling $30 million were due
in quarterly installments over three years from the closing date, with an interest rate of 6
percent per annum, and not subject to offset. Payment of the $30 million obligation was further
provided for by an irrevocable letter of credit issued pursuant to the Credit Agreement. The
remaining $7.5 million obligation was payable to the Sellers in a lump sum payment 18 months from
the closing date, with an interest rate of 6 percent per annum, which was unsecured and subject to
offset to satisfy any claims to indemnification; provided that if an existing obligation of the
Sellers was satisfied prior to the 18-month maturity date, $3.75 million of such note was to be
paid in advance of the maturity date, and provided further that if the existing obligation was not
satisfied prior to the 18-month maturity date, $3.75 million of such note was to be withheld until
such obligation was satisfied, or until the third anniversary of the closing date, whichever
occurred first. As a result of an existing obligation of the Sellers being satisfied prior to the
18-month maturity date, we paid $3.75 million of such note during the third quarter of 2007. We
also paid a quarterly installment in the amount of $2.5 million in the fourth quarter of 2007, in
accordance with the note agreements. In the first quarter of 2008, we repaid in full the promissory
notes outstanding at December 31, 2007 of $31.3 million.
In addition, certain international subsidiaries have borrowing arrangements locally outside of
the Credit Agreement discussed above. As of June 30, 2008, there were no borrowings outstanding
under such arrangements.
On January 28, 2008, the Board of Directors authorized a share repurchase program increasing
the total outstanding authorization to 3.0 million shares of common stock. The Companys previous
authorization was cancelled with the new authorization. During the three months ended March 30,
2008, we repurchased 0.8 million shares completing the 10b5-1 plan announced in May 2007. As of
June 30, 2008, we had repurchased 0.7 million shares under the latest authorization and held, in
total, 16.7 million shares of treasury stock acquired at an average price of $27.57 per share.
Authorization for repurchases of an additional 2.3 million shares remained outstanding as of June
30, 2008.
We paid cash dividends of $0.16 per share, or $6.0 million, during the first quarter of 2008
and $0.16 per share, or $6.0 million, during the second quarter of 2008. On July 31, 2008, our
Board of Directors declared a third quarter cash dividend of $0.16 per share payable September 30,
2008, to shareholders of record at the close of business on September 15, 2008. Any future
dividends are at the discretion of, and subject to, the approval of our Board of Directors.
We expect total pension contributions to be in the range of $4 million to $5 million in 2008.
We contributed approximately $1.1 million to our pension plans during the first half of 2008.
Our remaining anticipated liquidity needs for 2008 include but are not limited to the
following: capital expenditures in the range of $9 million to $14 million; restructuring payments
of approximately $20 million; pension funding in a range of $4 million to $5 million; operating
lease payments of approximately $8 million; and any amounts associated with litigation, the
repurchase of common stock under the authorization discussed above, or dividends that may be paid
upon approval of the Board of Directors. We expect that cash and cash equivalents, together with
cash flow from operations and availability of borrowings under our current and future sources of
financing, will provide liquidity sufficient to meet these needs and for our operations.
Other than operating lease commitments, we are not using off-balance sheet arrangements,
including special purpose entities, nor do we have any contractual obligations or commercial
commitments with terms greater than one year that would significantly impact our liquidity.
28
Table of Contents
Contractual Obligations
A table of our contractual obligations was provided in Item 7 in our Annual Report on Form
10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007. We repaid the full amount of the Memcorp
promissory notes of $31.3 million in the first three months of 2008. There were no other
significant changes to our contractual obligations during the first six months of 2008.
Fair Value Measurements
As discussed in Note 3 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, we adopted the
provision of Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Statement No. 157, Fair Value Measurements
(SFAS 157) effective January 1, 2008. The adoption of SFAS 157 had no material impact on our
financial results for the quarter ended June 30, 2008.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
A discussion of the Companys critical accounting policies was provided in Item 7 in our
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007. There were no significant
changes to these accounting policies during the first six months of 2008.
The Company is required to test goodwill for impairment at least annually. The goodwill
impairment test compares the fair value of individual reporting units to the carrying value of
these reporting units. If fair value is less than carrying value, a goodwill impairment may be
present. The market value of the Companys common stock is an indicator of fair value and a
consideration in determining the fair value of the companys reporting units. A significant decline
in the market value of the Companys common stock from current levels could result in an impairment
of the carrying value of goodwill.
Recently Issued Accounting Standards
In May 2008, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 162, The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles,
(SFAS 162) to set forth levels of authority for various types of accounting standards (the GAAP
hierarchy). The current GAAP hierarchy, as set forth in the AICPA Statement on Auditing Standards
69 (SAS 69), has been criticized in the past because 1) it is directed to auditors rather than
entities, 2) it is complex, and 3) it ranks FASB Statements of Financial Accounting Concepts, which
are subject to the same level of due process as FASB Statements of Financial Accounting Standards,
below industry practices that are widely recognized as generally accepted but are not subject to
due process. By moving the GAAP hierarchy into the accounting literature, SFAS 162 establishes that
decisions with respect to the GAAP hierarchy rest primarily with an entity not its auditor in
selecting accounting principles for financial statements that are presented in conformity with
GAAP. In order to fully shift the GAAP hierarchy from the auditing literature to the accounting
literature, the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) has released a final amendment to
their auditing standards, including SAS 69 noted above. The effective date of SFAS 162 will be 60
days after the SEC approves the PCAOBs amendments to the auditing standards. We have determined
that the adoption of SFAS 162 will not have a material impact on our consolidated financial
position, results of operations or cash flows.
On April 25, 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (FSP) SFAS No. 142-3, Determination of
the Useful Life of Intangible Assets, which amends the list of factors an entity should consider in
developing renewal or extension assumptions used in determining the useful life of recognized
intangible assets under SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. The new guidance
applies to (1) intangible assets that are acquired individually or with a group of other assets and
(2) intangible assets acquired in both business combinations and asset acquisitions. We are
required to adopt the FSP at the beginning of 2009 and for interim periods within that year. While
the guidance on determining the useful life of a recognized intangible asset must
be applied prospectively only to intangible assets acquired after the FSPs effective date,
the disclosure requirements of the FSP must be applied prospectively to all intangible assets
recognized as of, and after, the FSPs effective date. Early adoption of the FSP is prohibited. We
are currently evaluating the impact of this standard on our Consolidated Financial Statements.
In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and
Hedging Activities an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133 (SFAS 161). SFAS 161 requires
qualitative disclosures about objectives and strategies for using derivatives, quantitative
disclosures about fair value amounts of, and gains and losses on, derivative instruments, and
disclosures about credit-risk-related contingent features in derivative agreements. We are required
to adopt SFAS 161 effective at the beginning of 2009. We are currently evaluating the disclosure
implications of this statement.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141(R), Business Combinations (SFAS 141(R)), which
is a revision of SFAS No. 141, Business Combinations. SFAS 141(R) retains the fundamental
requirements in SFAS No. 141 that the acquisition method of accounting be used for all business
combinations and for an acquirer to be identified for each business combination.
29
Table of Contents
This statement
includes changes in the measurement of fair value of the assets acquired, the liabilities assumed
and any noncontrolling interest in the acquiree as of the acquisition date, with limited
exceptions. This statement requires in general that transaction costs and costs to restructure the
acquired company be expensed and contractual contingencies be recorded at their acquisition-date
fair values. We are required to adopt the new standard prospectively effective at the beginning of
2009. Early adoption of SFAS 141(R) is prohibited. We are currently evaluating the impact of this
standard on our Consolidated Financial Statements.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated
Financial Statements an amendment of ARB No. 51. This statement clarifies that a noncontrolling
interest in a subsidiary is an ownership interest in the consolidated entity that should be
reported as equity in the consolidated financial statements. This statement also changes the way
the consolidated income statement is presented. It requires consolidated net income to be reported
at amounts that include the amounts attributable to both the parent and the noncontrolling
interest, with disclosure on the face of the consolidated statement of income of the amounts of
consolidated net income attributable to the parent and the noncontrolling interest. We are required
to adopt the new standard effective at the beginning of 2009. We have determined that the adoption
of SFAS 160 will not have a material impact on our consolidated financial position, results of
operations or cash flows.
Subsequent Event
On July 21, 2008, the Board of Directors approved the Companys restructuring plan for its
Camarillo, California plant as a further implementation of the Companys manufacturing strategy.
The Company will end manufacturing operations and exit its Camarillo plant by year-end 2008 and
focus its manufacturing efforts on magnetic tape coating operations at its existing plant in
Weatherford, Oklahoma.
The restructuring will result in the elimination of approximately 140 positions by the end of
2008 out of a current worldwide total of 1,950. The Company anticipates it will incur up to $20
million in restructuring and related charges associated with the Camarillo closure, the majority of
which will occur in the second half of 2008. Approximately half of the charges will be non-cash
asset write-offs. The remaining half of the charges will be divided equally between cash payments
associated with severance benefits and costs of exiting the site.
Forward-Looking Statements and Risk Factors
The following section contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private
Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.
This business outlook, except where noted, is unchanged from the outlook issued in January
2008, and is subject to the risks and uncertainties described below.
| Revenue is targeted at approximately $2.4 billion, representing growth of approximately 16 percent over 2007. | ||
| Operating income, including restructuring and other charges, is targeted to be in the range of $80 million to $90 million. We anticipate restructuring and other charges to be in the range of $17 million to $22 million for 2008. This change in outlook is the result of the anticipated 2008 restructuring and related charges of $13 million to $16 million associated with the manufacturing restructuring announced July 22, 2008. Previously, operating income was targeted to be in the range of $95 million to $105 million with restructuring and other charges in the range of $4 million to $6 million for 2008. | ||
| Diluted earnings per share is targeted between $1.26 and $1.43 which includes the negative impact of approximately $0.33 from restructuring and related charges. This outlook reflects the restructuring and related charges discussed above. Previously, diluted earnings per share was targeted between $1.51 and $1.68 which included the negative impact of approximately $0.08 from restructuring and other charges. | ||
| Capital spending is targeted in the range of $15 million to $20 million. | ||
| The tax rate is anticipated to be in the range of 35 percent to 37 percent, absent any one-time tax items that may occur in the future. |
| Depreciation and amortization expense is targeted in the range of $48 million to $52 million. |
30
Table of Contents
Certain information which does not relate to historical financial information may be deemed to
constitute forward-looking statements. The words or phrases is targeted, will likely result,
are expected to, will continue, is anticipated, estimate, project, believe or similar
expressions identify forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities
Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such statements are subject to certain risks and uncertainties that
could cause our actual results in the future to differ materially from our historical results and
those presently anticipated or projected. We wish to caution investors not to place undue reliance
on any such forward-looking statements. Any forward-looking statements speak only as of the date on
which such statements are made, and we undertake no obligation to update such statements to reflect
events or circumstances arising after such date. Risk factors include our ability to successfully
integrate our recent acquisitions and achieve the anticipated benefits, including synergies, in a
timely manner; our ability to successfully manage multiple brands globally; our ability to
successfully defend our intellectual property rights; continuing uncertainty in global economic
conditions; our ability to meet our revenue growth and cost reduction targets; our ability to
successfully implement our global manufacturing strategy for magnetic data storage products and to
realize the benefits expected from the related restructuring; our ability to introduce new
offerings in a timely manner either independently or in association with OEMs or other third
parties; our ability to efficiently source, warehouse and distribute our products globally; our
ability to secure and maintain adequate shelf and display space at retailers which conduct periodic
line reviews; our ability to achieve the expected benefits from our strategic relationships and
distribution agreements; the competitive pricing environment and its possible impact on
profitability and inventory valuations; foreign currency fluctuations; the outcome of any pending
or future litigation, including the pending Philips litigation; our ability to secure adequate
supply of certain high demand products at acceptable prices; the ready availability and price of
energy and key raw materials or critical components; the market acceptance of newly introduced
product and service offerings; the rate of decline for certain existing products, especially
proprietary tape products; the possibility that our goodwill or other assets may become impaired,
as well as various factors set forth under the caption Risk Factors in Item 1A of the Companys
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 and from time to time in our
filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk.
Except for the paragraph noted below, there has been no material change since the Companys
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007. For further information,
see Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk included in the Companys
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007.
As of June 30, 2008, we had $258.1 million notional amount of foreign currency forward and
option contracts of which $83.1 million hedged recorded balance sheet exposures. This compares to
$321.4 million notional amount of foreign currency forward and option contracts as of December 31,
2007, of which $67.8 million hedged recorded balance sheet exposures. An immediate adverse change
of 10 percent in quarter-end foreign currency exchange rates with all other variables (including
interest rates) held constant would reduce the fair value of foreign currency contracts outstanding
as of June 30, 2008 by $14.4 million.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures.
Based on an evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e)
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Exchange Act)) as of June 30, 2008, the end of the
period covered by this report, the President and Chief Executive Officer, Frank P. Russomanno, and
the Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, Paul R. Zeller, have concluded that the disclosure
controls and procedures were effective.
During the quarter ended June 30, 2008, there was no change in our internal control over
financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial
reporting. The Company is in the process of integrating certain acquired entities onto its
information technology system. Management does not believe that these implementations will
adversely affect the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
31
Table of Contents
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings.
In the normal course of business, we periodically enter into agreements that incorporate
general indemnification language. Performance under these indemnities would generally be triggered
by a breach of terms of the contract or by a third-party claim. There have historically been no
material losses related to such indemnifications. In accordance with SFAS No. 5, Accounting for
Contingencies, we record a liability in our consolidated financial statements for these actions
when a loss is known or considered probable and the amount can be reasonably estimated.
We are the subject of various pending or threatened legal actions in the ordinary course of
our business. All such matters are subject to many uncertainties and outcomes that are not
predictable with assurance. Consequently, as of June 30, 2008, we are unable to ascertain the
ultimate aggregate amount of any monetary liability or financial impact that we may incur with
respect to these matters. While these matters could materially affect operating results depending
upon the final resolution in future periods, it is our opinion that after final disposition, except
for possibly the Philips dispute described below, any monetary liability beyond that provided in
the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as of June 30, 2008 would not be material to our financial
position.
Moser Baer India Ltd. (MBI) has made a claim for indemnification of its legal expenses
incurred with respect to the Philips litigation described below. We are currently reviewing this
claim to determine the extent of our obligations under the relevant agreements with MBI.
Philips
Imation filed a Declaratory Judgment Action on October 27, 2006, in Federal District Court in
St. Paul, Minnesota requesting that the court resolve an ongoing dispute with Philips Electronics
N.V., U.S. Philips Corporation and North American Philips Corporation (collectively, Philips).
Philips has asserted that (1) the patent cross-license between 3M Company and Philips was not
validly assigned to Imation in connection with the spin-off of Imation from 3M Company in 1996; (2)
Imations 51 percent owned subsidiary, Global Data Media, (GDM) is not a subsidiary as defined in
the cross-license; (3) the coverage of the cross-license does not apply to Imations acquisition of
Memorex; (4) the cross-license does not apply to DVD discs; (5) certain Philips patents that are
not covered by the cross-license are infringed by Imation; and (6) as a result, Imation owes
Philips royalties for the prior and future sales of CD and DVD discs. We believe that these
allegations are without merit and filed a Declaratory Judgment Action to have a court reaffirm
Imations rights under the cross-license. On February 26, 2007, the parties signed a Standstill
Agreement and the litigation was voluntarily dismissed without prejudice. Imation and Philips held
settlement negotiations but were unable to come to an agreement. Imation re-filed its Declaratory
Judgment Action on August 10, 2007. Philips filed its Answer and Counterclaims against Imation and
MBI, Imations partner in GDM. Philips alleged that (1) the cross-license does not apply to
companies that Imation purchased or created after March 1, 2000; (2) GDM is not a legitimate
subsidiary of Imation; (3) Imations formation of GDM is a breach of the cross-license resulting in
termination of the cross-license at that time; (4) Imation (including Memorex and GDM) infringes
various patents that would otherwise be licensed under the cross-license; and (5) Imation
(including Memorex and GDM) infringes one or more patents that are not covered by the
cross-license. Philips claimed damages of $655 million plus interest and costs, as well as a claim
requesting a trebling of that amount. Imation was aware of these claims prior to filing its
Declaratory Judgment Action. Imation believed then and continues to believe that Philips claims
are without merit.
On October 30, 2007, Imation filed its answers to Philips counterclaims and a Motion for
Partial Summary Judgment on the issue of whether the patent cross-license was validly assigned by
3M Company to Imation. Philips did not contest Imations Motion and on November 26, 2007, the
parties filed a stipulation affirming that the cross-license was validly assigned to Imation.
On April 7, 2008, Philips amended its counterclaims to (1) add claims that DVD discs sold by
Imation infringe its patents, and (2) withdraw its specific claim of $655 million in damages in
favor of the more general damages in an amount to be proved at trial.
Imation, Philips and MBI participated in a series of court-ordered settlement discussions in
June 2008 and plan to continue such discussions. Discovery will continue in parallel with such
discussions. Trial is currently scheduled for fall 2009.
32
Table of Contents
SanDisk
On July 11, 2007, SanDisk Corporation filed a patent infringement action in U.S. District
Court, Northern District of California, against Imation and its subsidiary, Memorex Products, Inc.
This action alleged that we have infringed a patent held by SanDisk (U.S. Patent 5,602,987) by
offering and selling USB flash drives. On September 6, 2007, SanDisk voluntarily withdrew its
lawsuit without prejudice.
On October 24, 2007, SanDisk Corporation filed another patent infringement action in U.S.
District Court, Western District of Wisconsin, against Imation and its subsidiaries, Imation
Enterprises Corp. and Memorex Products, Inc. The lawsuit also names over twenty other companies as
defendants. This action alleges that we have infringed five patents held by SanDisk: US Patent
6,426,893; 6,763,424; 5,719,808; 6,947,332 and 7,137,011. SanDisk alleges that our sale of various
flash memory products, such as USB flash drives and certain flash card formats, infringes these
patents and is seeking damages for prior sales, and an injunction and/or royalties on future sales.
This action has been stayed pending resolution of the related case described below.
Also on October 24, 2007, SanDisk filed a complaint with the United States International Trade
Commission (ITC) against the same Imation entities listed above, as well as over twenty other
companies. This action involves the same patents and the same products as described above and
SanDisk is seeking an order from the ITC blocking the defendants importation of these products
into the United States. On January 9, 2008, Imation filed its response to the complaint. Discovery
is ongoing and all remaining issues continue to be in dispute. Because some of our suppliers are
already licensed by SanDisk and we are generally indemnified by our suppliers against claims for
patent infringement, at this time we do not believe these actions will have a material adverse
impact on our financial statements.
Item 1A. Risk Factors.
There has been no material change in the risk factors set forth in our Annual Report on Form
10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007. For further information, see Item 1A. Risk
Factors included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.
(a) (b)
Not applicable
(c) Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
(c) | ||||||||||||||||
Total Number of | Maximum Number | |||||||||||||||
(a) | (b) | Shares Purchased | of Shares that May | |||||||||||||
Total Number | Average | as Part of Publicly | Yet Be Purchased | |||||||||||||
of Shares | Price Paid | Announced Plans | Under the Plans or | |||||||||||||
Period | Purchased | per Share | or Programs | Programs | ||||||||||||
April 1, 2008 April 30, 2008 |
| $ | | | 2,604,700 | |||||||||||
May 1,
2008 May 31, 2008 |
155,230 | 25.55 | 139,000 | 2,465,700 | ||||||||||||
June 1,
2008 June 30, 2008 |
129,800 | 26.14 | 129,800 | 2,335,900 | ||||||||||||
Total |
285,030 | $ | 25.82 | 268,800 | 2,335,900 | |||||||||||
a) | The purchases in this column include shares repurchased as part of our publicly announced programs and include 16,230 shares that were surrendered to Imation by participants in our stock-based compensation plans (the Plans) to satisfy the tax obligations related to the vesting of restricted stock awards. | |
b) | The average price paid in this column includes shares repurchased as part of our publicly announced programs and shares that were surrendered to Imation by participants in the Plans to satisfy the tax obligations related to the vesting of restricted stock awards. |
33
Table of Contents
c) | On April 17, 2007, our Board of Directors authorized and announced the repurchase of 5.0 million shares of common stock. On January 28, 2008, the Board of Directors authorized and announced a share repurchase program increasing total outstanding share repurchase authorization to 3.0 million shares of common stock. The Companys previous authorization, which had a remaining share repurchase authorization of 0.8 million shares, was cancelled with the new authorization. During the three months ended June 30, 2008, we repurchased 0.3 million shares. As of June 30, 2008, we had repurchased 0.7 million shares under the latest authorization and held, in total, 16.7 million shares of treasury stock acquired at an average price of $27.57 per share. Authorization for repurchases of an additional 2.3 million shares remained outstanding as of June 30, 2008, and such authorization has no expiration date. |
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities.
Not Applicable
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.
At our Annual Meeting of Shareholders held on May 7, 2008, the shareholders approved the
following:
a) | A proposal to elect five directors of Imation, with four directors (Ms. Hart and Messrs. Leung and Lucas and Dr. Reich) being nominated for three-year terms ending in 2011 and one director (Mr. Russomanno) being nominated for a two-year term ending in 2010, as follows: |
Votes | ||||||||
Directors | Voted For | Withheld | ||||||
Linda W. Hart |
31,734,532 | 2,083,954 | ||||||
Raymond Leung |
32,788,722 | 1,029,764 | ||||||
Mark E. Lucas |
32,874,193 | 944,293 | ||||||
Charles Reich |
31,902,438 | 1,916,048 | ||||||
Frank P. Russomanno |
32,725,347 | 1,093,139 |
There were no broker non-votes. In addition, the terms of the following directors continued
after the meeting: Class I directors with a term ending in 2009: Michael S. Fields, L. White
Matthews, III and Ronald T. LeMay and Class II directors with a term ending in 2010: Charles
A. Haggerty, Glen A. Taylor and Daryl J. White.
b) | A proposal to ratify the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP to serve as the independent registered public accounting firm of the Company for the year ending December 31, 2008. The proposal received 33,488,569 votes for and 313,514 against ratification. There were 16,403 abstentions and no broker non-votes. | ||
c) | A proposal to approve the 2008 Stock Incentive Plan. The proposal received 26,234,851votes for and 2,783,646 against approval. There were 2,623,725 abstentions and 2,176,264 broker non-votes. |
Item 5. Other Information.
Not Applicable
34
Table of Contents
Item 6. Exhibits.
The following documents are filed as part of this report:
Exhibit | |||||
Number | Description of Exhibit | ||||
10.1 | Imation Corp. 2008 Stock Incentive Plan
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Imations Form 8-K Current Report filed on May 12, 2008) |
||||
10.2 | Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement for Executive Officers under the Imation Corp. 2005 Stock Incentive Plan
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Imations Form 8-K Current Report filed on May 12, 2008) |
||||
10.3 | Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement for Executive Officers under the Imation Corp. 2008 Stock Incentive Plan
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to Imations Form 8-K Current Report filed on May 12, 2008) |
||||
10.4 | Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement for Directors under the Imation Corp. 2008 Stock Incentive Plan
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to Imations Form 8-K Current Report filed on May 12, 2008) |
||||
10.5 | Form of Restricted Stock Agreement for Executive Officers under the Imation Corp. 2008 Stock Incentive Plan
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to Imations Form 8-K Current Report filed on May 12, 2008) |
||||
10.6 | Form of Restricted Stock Agreement for Directors under the Imation Corp. 2008 Stock Incentive Plan
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to Imations Form 8-K Current Report filed on May 12, 2008) |
||||
15.1 | An awareness letter from the Companys independent registered public accounting firm regarding unaudited interim
financial statements |
||||
31.1 | Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
||||
31.2 | Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
||||
32.1 | Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
||||
32.2 | Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
35
Table of Contents
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
Imation Corp. |
||||
Date: August 1, 2008 | /s/ Paul R. Zeller | |||
Paul R. Zeller | ||||
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (duly authorized officer and principal financial officer) |
36
Table of Contents
EXHIBIT INDEX
Exhibit | ||||
Number | Description of Exhibit | |||
15.1 | An awareness letter from the Companys independent registered public accounting firm regarding unaudited interim
financial statements |
|||
31.1 | Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|||
31.2 | Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|||
32.1 | Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|||
32.2 | Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
37