Glatfelter Corp - Annual Report: 2008 (Form 10-K)
Table of Contents
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-K
þ
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
|
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 | ||
or
|
||
o
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
|
For the transition period from to |
Commission file number 1-03560
P. H. Glatfelter
Company
(Exact name of registrant as
specified in its charter)
Pennsylvania (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
23-0628360 (IRS Employer Identification No.) |
|
96 South George Street, Suite 500
York, Pennsylvania 17401 (Address of principal executive offices) |
(717) 225-4711 (Registrants telephone number, including area code) |
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the
Act:
Title of Class
|
Name of Exchange on Which Registered
|
|
Common Stock, par value $.01 per share | New York Stock Exchange |
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known
seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities
Act. Yes o No þ.
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file
reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the
Act. Yes o No þ.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed
all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject
to such filing requirements for at least the past
90 days. Yes þ No o.
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers
pursuant to Item 405 of
Regulation S-K
is not contained herein, and will not be contained to the best
of registrants knowledge, in definitive proxy of
information statements incorporated by reference in
Part III of this
Form 10-K
or any amendment to this
Form 10-K. o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated
filer, or a small reporting company. See the definitions of
large accelerated filer, accelerated
filer and smaller reporting company in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer o | Accelerated filer þ | Non-accelerated filer o | Smaller reporting company o |
(Do
not check if a smaller reporting company)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company
(as defined in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange
Act) Yes o No þ.
Based on the closing price as of June 30, 2008, the
aggregate market value of Common Stock of the Registrant held by
non-affiliates was $606.2 million.
Common Stock outstanding on March 5, 2009 totaled
45,474,571 shares.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the following documents are incorporated by
reference in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K:
Proxy Statement to be dated on or about March 25, 2009
(Part III).
P. H. GLATFELTER
COMPANY
ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K
For the Year Ended
ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K
For the Year Ended
DECEMBER 31,
2008
Table of Contents
Table of Contents
PART I
ITEM 1 | BUSINESS |
Overview Glatfelter began operations in 1864
and today, we believe we are one of the worlds leading
manufacturers of specialty papers and engineered (paper based)
products. Headquartered in York, Pennsylvania, we own and
operate manufacturing facilities located in Pennsylvania, Ohio,
Germany, the United Kingdom, France and the Philippines.
We serve customers in numerous markets, including book
publishing, carbonless and forms, envelope and converting,
engineered products, food and beverage, composite laminates and
other highly technical niche markets. Many of the markets in
which we operate are characterized by higher-value-added
products and, in some cases, by higher growth prospects and
lower cyclicality than commodity paper markets. Examples of some
of our key product offerings include papers for:
| trade book publishing; | |
| carbonless products; | |
| tea bag and coffee pods/pads and filters; | |
| specialized envelopes; | |
| playing cards; | |
| pressure-sensitive postage stamps; | |
| metallized papers for labels and packaging; and | |
| digital imaging applications. |
Acquisitions Over the past several years we
completed the acquisitions summarized in the following table:
Est |
Primary |
||||||||||||||||||
Purchase |
Annual |
Paper |
|||||||||||||||||
Dollars in millions | Date | Price | Revenue | Products | |||||||||||||||
Business Location
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Lydney, England
|
Mar 06 | $ | 65.0 | $ | 75.0 |
Tea bag & coffee papers |
|||||||||||||
Chillicothe, Ohio
|
Apr 06 | 83.3 | 440.0 | Carbonless | |||||||||||||||
Caerphilly, Wales
|
Nov 07 | 12.6 | 53.4 | Metallized | |||||||||||||||
These strategic acquisitions significantly increased our
revenues and provide us with additional operating scale,
opportunities for increased production capacity, and an
expansion of our geographic reach.
Our Business Units We manage our business as
two distinct units: the North America-based Specialty Papers
business unit and the Europe-based Composite Fibers business
unit. The following table summarizes consolidated net sales and
the relative net sales contribution of each of our business
units for the past three years:
Dollars in thousands | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | ||||||||||||
Net sales
|
$ | 1,263,850 | $ | 1,148,323 | $ | 986,411 | |||||||||
Business unit composition
|
|||||||||||||||
Specialty Papers
|
66.0 | % | 69.9 | % | 70.3 | % | |||||||||
Composite Fibers
|
34.0 | 30.1 | 29.7 | ||||||||||||
Total
|
100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | |||||||||
Net tons sold by each business unit for the past three years
were as follows:
2008 | 2007 | 2006 | |||||||||||||
Specialty Papers
|
743,755 | 726,657 | 653,734 | ||||||||||||
Composite Fibers
|
85,599 | 72,855 | 68,148 | ||||||||||||
Other
|
| | 10 | ||||||||||||
Total
|
829,354 | 799,512 | 721,892 | ||||||||||||
Specialty Papers Our North
America-based Specialty Papers business unit focuses on
producing papers for the following markets:
| Book publishing papers for the production of high quality hardbound books and other book publishing needs; | |
| Carbonless and forms papers for credit card receipts, multi-part forms, security papers and other end-user applications; | |
| Envelope and converting papers for the direct mail market, shopping bags, and other converting applications; and | |
| Engineered products for digital imaging, transfer, casting, release, postal, playing card and other niche specialty applications. |
The markets in which Specialty Papers competes has undergone
significant and rapid consolidation over the past several years
resulting in fewer, more globally focused producers. Over 80% of
the North American market share is now served by five paper
companies, of which Glatfelter is one. Specialty Papers
revenue composition by market consisted of the following for the
years indicated:
In thousands | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | ||||||||||||
Carbonless & forms
|
$ | 338,067 | $ | 345,785 | $ | 266,647 | |||||||||
Book publishing
|
201,040 | 185,343 | 166,605 | ||||||||||||
Envelope & converting
|
138,293 | 116,797 | 103,042 | ||||||||||||
Engineered products
|
149,372 | 136,785 | 137,007 | ||||||||||||
Other
|
7,127 | 17,583 | 20,359 | ||||||||||||
Total
|
$ | 833,899 | $ | 802,293 | $ | 693,660 | |||||||||
-1-
GLATFELTER
Table of Contents
We believe we are one of the leading suppliers of book
publishing papers in the United States and the second leading
carbonless paper producer. The market for carbonless papers is
declining approximately 8% to 10% per year. However, we have
been successful in executing our strategy to replace this lost
volume with book publishing papers, envelope &
converting papers, forms and other products. Specialty Papers
also produces paper that is converted into specialized envelopes
in a wide array of colors, finishes and capabilities. These
markets are generally more mature and declining. However, we
compete on our customer service capabilities and have grown our
market share each of the last three years.
Specialty Papers highly technical engineered products
include those designed for multiple end uses, such as papers for
pressure-sensitive postage stamps, greeting and playing cards,
conical cups, digital imaging applications and for release paper
applications. Such products comprise an array of distinct
business niches that are in a continuous state of evolution.
Many of these products are utilized by demanding, specialized
customer and end-user applications. Some of our products are new
and high growth while others are more mature and further along
in the product life cycle. Because many of these products are
technically complex and involve substantial customer-supplier
development collaboration, they typically command higher per ton
prices and generally exhibit greater pricing stability relative
to commodity grade paper products.
Composite Fibers Our Composite Fibers
business unit, based in Gernsbach, Germany, serves customers
globally and focuses on higher-value-added products in the
following markets:
| Food & Beverage paper used for tea bags and coffee pods/pads and filters; | |
| Composite Laminates papers used in production of decorative laminates for furniture and flooring; | |
| Metallized products used in the labeling of beer bottles, innerliners, gift wrap, self-adhesive labels and other consumer products applications; and | |
| Technical Specialties is a diverse line of paper products used in batteries, medical masks and other highly engineered applications. |
We believe this business unit maintains a market leadership
position in the tea bag and coffee pods/pads and filters market
and the composite laminates market. Since the completion of the
Caerphilly acquisition, we have the second largest market share
for metallized products globally. Composite Fibers revenue
composition by market consisted of the following for the years
indicated:
In thousands | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | ||||||||||||
Food & beverage
|
$ | 252,545 | $ | 218,961 | $ | 180,258 | |||||||||
Metallized
|
85,719 | 45,426 | 40,078 | ||||||||||||
Composite laminates
|
58,705 | 52,972 | 50,734 | ||||||||||||
Technical specialties and other
|
32,983 | 28,671 | 21,681 | ||||||||||||
Total
|
$ | 429,952 | $ | 346,030 | $ | 292,751 | |||||||||
Our focus on products made from abaca pulp has made us the
worlds largest producer of tea bag and coffee pods/pads
and filter papers. Many of this units papers are
technically sophisticated. Most of the papers produced in the
Composite Fibers business unit, except for metallized papers,
are extremely lightweight and require very specialized fibers.
Our engineering capabilities, specifically designed papermaking
equipment and customer orientation position us well to compete
in these global markets.
Additional financial information for each of our business units
is included in Item 7 Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations and in Item 8 Financial Statements
and Supplementary Data, Note 21.
Our Competitive Strengths Since commencing
operations over 140 years ago, we believe that Glatfelter
has developed into one of the worlds leading manufacturers
of specialty papers and engineered products. We believe that the
following competitive strengths have contributed to our success:
Leading market positions in higher-value, niche
segments. We have focused our resources to
achieve market-leading positions in certain higher-value, niche
segments. Our products include various highly specialized paper
products designed for technically demanding end uses.
Consequently, many of our products achieve premium pricing
relative to that of commodity paper grades. In 2008 and 2007,
approximately 81% of our sales were derived from these
higher-value, niche products. The specialized nature of these
products generally provides greater pricing stability relative
to commodity paper products.
Customer-centric business
focus. We offer a unique and diverse product line
that can be customized to serve the individual needs of our
customers. Our customer focus allows us to develop close
relationships with our key customers and to be adaptable in our
product development, manufacturing, sales and marketing
practices. We believe that this approach has led to the
development of excellent customer relationships, defensible
market positions, and increased pricing stability relative to
commodity paper producers. Additionally, our
-2-
GLATFELTER
Table of Contents
customer-centric focus has been a key driver to our success in
new product development.
Significant investment in product
development. In order to keep up with our
customers ever-changing needs, we continually enhance our
product offerings through significant investment in product
development. In each of the past three years, we invested
approximately $8.0 million in product development
activities. We derive a significant portion of our revenue from
products developed, enhanced or improved as a result of these
activities. Revenue generated from products developed, enhanced
or improved within the five previous years as a result of these
activities represented approximately 54% of net sales in each of
the past three years ended December 31, 2008.
Integrated and flexible
production. As a nearly fully integrated
producer, we are able to mitigate changes in the costs of
certain raw materials and energy. In Specialty Papers, our
Spring Grove and Chillicothe facilities are vertically
integrated operations producing in excess of 85% of the annual
pulp required for their paper production. Our Spring Grove and
Chillicothe facilities also generate 100% of the steam and
substantially all of the electricity required for their
operations. Our Specialty Papers mills also provide us with a
flexible operating platform allowing us to shift certain
production from one machine or mill to another should demand
levels change.
In Composite Fibers, our Philippine mill processes abaca fiber
to produce abaca pulp, a key raw material used by this business
unit. The Philippine mill produces approximately 70% of the
annual abaca pulp required for Composite Fibers production
requirements.
Our Business Strategy Our vision is to become
the global supplier of choice in specialty papers and engineered
products. We are continuously developing and refining our
strategies to strengthen our business and position it for the
future. Execution of our strategies is dependent on our customer
relationships, technology, operational flexibility and our new
product development efforts. Components of our strategy include:
Specialty Papers The North American
uncoated free sheet market has been challenged by a supply and
demand imbalance, particularly for commodity-like products.
While the industry has narrowed the supply-demand gap by
eliminating capacity, the imbalance continues. To be successful
in the current market environment, our strategy is focused on:
| employing a low-cost approach to our manufacturing activities and continuously implementing cost reduction initiatives; | |
| improving business processes and deploying continuous improvement capabilities to maintain market leadership positions in customer service; and | |
| optimizing our products mix by growing book publishing, envelope, forms and engineered products and utilizing new product development capabilities to replace declining carbonless volumes. |
Composite Fibers A core component of
this business units long-term strategy is to capture
world-wide growth in its core markets of food &
beverage, composite laminates and metallized papers. Composite
Fibers strategy also includes enhancing product mix across all
of its markets by utilizing new product development
capabilities. In addition, the Composite Fibers business unit is
focused on cost reduction initiatives including, among others,
work-force efficiencies and improved supply chain management.
Balance Sheet We are focused on prudent
financial management and the maintenance of a conservative
capital structure. We are committed to maintaining a strong
balance sheet and preserving our flexibility so that we may
pursue strategic opportunities, including strategic
acquisitions, that will benefit our shareholders.
Timberland Strategy In 2006, we
initiated a strategy to sell substantially all of our
timberlands. At the time the strategy was announced, we expected
proceeds from the sales to generate approximately
$150 million to $200 million on a pre-tax basis by the
end of 2010. Through the end of 2008, we have sold approximately
48,000 acres of timberland for an aggregate proceeds of
$121 million. As a result of conditions in the overall real
estate and credit markets, we do not expect to complete a
significant amount of additional sales in the near term.
Although proceeds have been used to reduce debt obligations, the
sale of timberland will require us to replace company owned
timberland as a source of fiber with more costly purchased
woods. We believe the interest expense reduction and the
financial flexibility for investment opportunity offer a greater
return than the additional higher cost for raw fiber.
-3-
GLATFELTER
Table of Contents
Raw Material and Energy The following table
provides an overview of the estimated amount of principal raw
materials (PRM) expected to be used in 2009 by each
of our manufacturing facilities:
Estimated Annual |
|||||||||||
Quantity (short |
Percent of PRM |
||||||||||
tons) | Purchased | ||||||||||
Specialty Papers
|
|||||||||||
Spring Grove
|
|||||||||||
Pulpwood
|
1,088,000 | 86 | |||||||||
Wood and other pulps
|
37,000 | 100 | |||||||||
Chillicothe
|
|||||||||||
Pulpwood
|
1,045,000 | 100 | |||||||||
Wood and other pulps
|
58,000 | 100 | |||||||||
Composite Fibers
|
|||||||||||
Wood and other pulps
|
35,120 | 100 | |||||||||
Abaca pulp
|
12,650 | 30 | |||||||||
Synthetic fiber
|
8,700 | 100 | |||||||||
Metallized base stock
|
32,800 | 100 | |||||||||
Abaca fiber
|
17,000 | 100 | |||||||||
Our Spring Grove, Pennsylvania and Chillicothe, Ohio mills are
vertically integrated operations producing in excess of 85% of
the combined annual pulp required for paper production. The
principal raw material used to produce this pulp is pulpwood, of
which both hardwoods and softwoods are used. Hardwoods are
available within a relatively short distance of our mills.
Softwoods are obtained from a variety of locations including the
states of Pennsylvania, Maryland, Delaware, Virginia, Kentucky,
Tennessee and South Carolina. To protect our sources of
pulpwood, we actively promote conservation and forest management
among suppliers and woodland owners. In addition to sourcing the
pulpwood in the open market, we have long-term supply contracts
that provide access to timber at market prices.
In addition to integrated pulp making, both the Spring Grove and
Chillicothe facilities generate 100% of the steam and 100% and
80%, respectively, of their electricity needs. Principal fuel
sources vary by facility and include over 600,000 tons of coal,
870,000 MMBTUs of natural gas, as well as recycled pulping
chemicals, bark, wood waste, and fuel oil. Spring Groves
coal needs are met under a contract that expires at the end of
2009 and Chillicothes coal needs are supplied under two
contracts that expire in the fourth quarter of 2010.
The Spring Grove facility produces more electricity than it
requires. Excess electricity is sold to the local power company
under a long-term co-generation contract expiring in April 2010.
Gross energy sales were $19.8 million, $19.6 million,
and $19.1 million in 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively. The
continuation of this revenue stream at these levels is dependent
on our ability to negotiate an electricity sales agreement at
pricing at or above current contracted levels for periods beyond
2010. Our current electricity contract provides for pricing
which is approximately 20% above current forward prices. In
addition, our cost of coal is under a long-term supply contract
that is currently below market. This coal contract expires at
the end of 2009. The current market price for coal is
approximately 30% to 35% above our current fixed-price contract.
This cost, as well as the costs incurred for natural gas and
other fuels used to generate electricity, has a major impact on
the net revenue and overall profitability of the Specialty Paper
business unit.
The Gernsbach, Scaër and Lydney facilities generate all of
the steam required for their operations. The Gernsbach facility
generated approximately 16% of its 2008 electricity needs and
purchased the balance. The Scaër and Lydney facilities
purchased 100% of their 2008 electric power requirements.
Natural gas was used to produce substantially all internally
generated energy at the Gernsbach, Scaër and Lydney
facilities during 2008.
Our Philippines mill processes abaca fiber to produce a
specialized pulp. This abaca pulp production provides a unique
advantage by supplying a key raw material used by our Composite
Fibers business unit. The supply of abaca fiber was somewhat
constrained in 2008. As a result, the Composite Fibers business
unit slowed its paper machines and used substitute grades of
abaca and substitute fibers to meet customer demands. In
addition, events may arise from the relatively unstable
political and economic environment in which the Philippine
facility operates that could interrupt the production of abaca
pulp. Management periodically evaluates the availability of
abaca pulp for our Composite Fibers business unit. Any extended
interruption of the Philippine operation could have a material
impact on our consolidated financial position
and/or
results of operations. We target to have approximately one month
of fiber supply in stock and one month of fiber supply at sea
available to us. In addition, we have established contingency
plans for alternative sources of abaca pulp. However, the cost
of obtaining abaca pulp from such alternative sources, if
available, would likely be much higher.
Based on information currently available, we believe that we
will continue to have ready access, for the foreseeable future,
to all principal raw materials used in the production of our
products. However, as discussed in the preceding paragraph, the
supply of abaca fiber has been constrained and has adversely
impacted pricing. The cost of our raw materials is subject to
significant change, including, but not limited to, the costs of
wood, pulp products, certain commodity chemicals and energy.
Concentration of Customers In the past three
years, no single customer represented more than 10% of our
consolidated net sales.
-4-
GLATFELTER
Table of Contents
Competition Our industry is highly
competitive. We compete on the basis of product quality,
customer service, product development, price and distribution.
We offer our products throughout the United States and globally
in approximately 85 countries. Competition in the markets in
which we participate comes from companies of various sizes, some
of which have greater financial and other capital resources than
we do.
There are a number of companies in the United States that
manufacture printing and converting papers. We believe we are
one of the leading producers of book publishing papers and
compete in these markets with, among others, Domtar and Fraser.
In the envelope sector we compete with, among others,
International Paper, Domtar and Blue Ridge. In the carbonless
paper and forms market, we compete with Appleton Papers and, to
a lesser extent, Nekoosa Papers, Inc. In our Specialty
Papers engineered products markets and for the Composite
Fibers business units markets, competition is product line
specific as the necessity for technical expertise and
specialized manufacturing equipment limits the number of
companies offering multiple product lines. We compete with
specialty divisions of large companies such as, among others,
Ahlstrom, International Paper, MeadWestvaco, Sappi and Stora
Enso. Service, product performance, technological advances and
product pricing are important competitive factors with respect
to all our products. We believe our reputation in these areas
continues to be excellent.
Capital Expenditures Our business is capital
intensive and requires extensive expenditures for new and
enhanced equipment. These capital investments are necessary for
environmental compliance, normal upgrades or replacements,
business strategy and research and development. For 2009, we
expect capital expenditures to total approximately
$35 million.
Environmental Matters We are subject to loss
contingencies resulting from regulation by various federal,
state, local and foreign governmental authorities with respect
to the environmental impact of our mills. To comply with
environmental laws and regulations, we have incurred substantial
capital and operating expenditures in past years. For a
discussion of environmental matters, see Item 8
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
Note 20.
Employees The following table summarizes our
workforce as of December 31, 2008:
Contract Period | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Location | Hourly | Salaried | Total | Union | Start | End | |||||||||||||||||||
U.S
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Corporate/Spring Grove
|
610 | 380 | 990 | United Steelworkers of | Feb. 2008 | Jan. 2011 | |||||||||||||||||||
America (USW) & Office and | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Professional | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Chillicothe/Fremont
|
1,124 | 333 | 1,457 | Employees International Union | Aug. 2006 | Aug. 2009 | |||||||||||||||||||
International
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gernsbach
|
355 | 204 | 559 | Industriegewerkschaft | Dec. 2008 | Dec. 2009 | |||||||||||||||||||
Bergbau, Chemie, Energie-IG | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
BCE | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Scaër
|
73 | 48 | 121 | Confederation Generale des | Mar. 2008 | Feb. 2009 | (1) | ||||||||||||||||||
Travailleurs & Force | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ouvriere | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Lydney
|
69 | 220 | 289 | Unite the Union | Feb. 2008 | Jan. 2009 | (1) | ||||||||||||||||||
Caerphilly
|
102 | 32 | 134 | General Maintenance & Boilers | Aug. 2008 | Dec. 2009 | |||||||||||||||||||
Philippines
|
55 | 28 | 83 | Newtech Pulp Workers Union & Federation of Democratic Labor Org. | Sept. 2007 | Sept. 2012 | |||||||||||||||||||
Total worldwide employees
|
2,388 | 1,245 | 3,633 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
(1) | Employees of these facilities are covered by one-year labor agreements. Negotiations to renew the agreements are underway. The terms and conditions of the existing agreements will remain in effect until new agreements are reached. |
We consider the overall relationship with our employees to be
satisfactory.
Available Information On our investor
relations page of our Corporate website at www.glatfelter.com we
make available free of charge our Annual Reports on
Form 10-K,
Quarterly Reports on
Form 10-Q
and Current Reports on
Form 8-K
and other related information as soon as reasonably practical
after they are filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission. In addition, our website includes a Corporate
Governance page consisting of, among others, our Governance
Principles and Code of Business Conduct, Board of Directors and
Executive Officers, Audit, Compensation, Finance and Nominating
Committees of the Board of Directors and their respective
Charters, Code of Business Ethics for the CEO and Senior
Financial Officers of Glatfelter, our whistle-blower
policy and other related material. We intend to satisfy the
disclosure requirement for any future amendments to, or waivers
from, our Code of Business Conduct or Code of Business Ethics
for the CEO and Senior Financial Officers by posting such
information on our website. We will
-5-
GLATFELTER
Table of Contents
provide a copy of the Code of Business Conduct or Code of
Business Ethics for the CEO and Senior Financial Officers,
without charge, to any person who requests one, by calling
(717) 225-2724.
ITEM 1A | RISK FACTORS |
Risks Related to
Our Business
Our business
and financial performance may be adversely affected by the
adverse global economic environment or downturns in the target
markets that we serve.
Demand for our products in the markets we serve is primarily
driven by demand for our customers products, which is
often affected by general economic conditions. Downturns in our
target markets could result in decreased demand for our
products. In particular, our businesses will be adversely
affected by the current global economic downturn and by softness
in targeted markets. Our results could be adversely affected if
economic conditions further weaken or fail to improve. Also,
there may be periods during which demand for our products is
insufficient to enable us to operate our production facilities
in an economical manner. The economic impact may cause customer
insolvencies which may result in their inability to satisfy
their financial obligations to us. These conditions are beyond
our ability to control and may have a significant impact on our
sales and results of operations.
In addition to fluctuations in demand for our products in the
markets we serve, the markets for our paper products are also
significantly affected by changes in industry capacity and
output levels. There have been periods of supply/demand
imbalance in the pulp and paper industry, which have caused pulp
and paper prices to be volatile. The timing and magnitude of
price increases or decreases in the pulp and paper market have
generally varied by region and by product type. A sustained
period of weak demand or excess supply would likely adversely
affect pulp and paper prices. This could have a material adverse
affect on our operating and financial results.
The impairment
of financial institutions may adversely affect us.
We, our customers and our vendors, have transactions and
borrowing arrangements with U.S. and foreign commercial
banks, and other financial institutions, some of whom may be
exposed to ratings downgrade, bankruptcy, liquidity, default or
similar risks, especially in connection with recent financial
market turmoil. A ratings downgrade, bankruptcy, receivership,
default or similar event involving such institutions may
adversely affect the counterpartys performance under
letters of credit, limit our access to capital, impact the
ability of our suppliers to provide us with raw materials needed
for our production, impact our customers ability to meet
obligations to us, or adversely affect our liquidity position,
future business and results of operations.
The cost of
raw materials and energy used to manufacture our products could
increase and the availability of certain raw materials could
become more constrained.
We require access to sufficient and reasonably priced quantities
of pulpwood, purchased pulps, pulp substitutes, abaca fiber and
certain other raw materials. Our Spring Grove and Chillicothe
locations are vertically integrated manufacturing facilities
that generate in excess of 85% of their annual pulp
requirements. However, as a result of selling timberlands over
the past two years, purchased timber will represent a larger
source of the total pulpwood used in our operations.
Our Philippine mill purchases abaca fiber to produce abaca pulp,
which we use to manufacture our tea bag and coffee pods/pads and
filter paper products at our Gernsbach, Scaër and Lydney
facilities. However, the supply of abaca fiber has been
constrained due to severe weather related damage to the source
crop as well as selection by land owners of alternative uses of
land in lieu of fiber producing activities. As a result of
supply constraints, pricing pressure persists.
The cost of many of our production materials and costs,
including petroleum based chemicals and freight charges, are
influenced by the cost of oil. In addition, coal is a principal
source fuel for both the Spring Grove and Chillicothe
facilities. Natural gas is the principal source of fuel for our
Chillicothe and Composite Fibers business unit facilities.
Other input costs such as caustic, starch and others, have
exhibited extreme upward pricing pressure. In addition, our
vendors liquidity may be impacted by the economy creating
supply shortages.
We may not be able to pass increased raw materials or energy
costs on to our customers if the market will not bear the higher
price or where existing agreements with our customers limit
price increases. If price adjustments significantly trail
increases in raw materials or energy prices our operating
results could be adversely affected.
Our industry
is highly competitive and increased competition could reduce our
sales and profitability.
In recent years, the global paper industry in which we compete
has been adversely affected by paper
-6-
GLATFELTER
Table of Contents
producing capacity exceeding the demand for products. As a
result, the uncoated free sheet industry has taken steps to
reduce underperforming capacity. However, slowing demand or
increased competition could force us to lower our prices or to
offer additional services at a higher cost to us, which could
reduce our gross margins and net income. The greater financial
resources of certain of our competitors may enable them to
commit larger amounts of capital in response to changing market
conditions. Certain competitors may also have the ability to
develop product or service innovations that could put us at a
competitive disadvantage.
Some of the factors that may adversely affect our ability to
compete in the markets in which we participate include:
| the entry of new competitors into the markets we serve, including foreign producers; | |
| the willingness of commodity-based paper producers to enter our specialty markets when they are unable to compete or when demand softens in their traditional markets; | |
| the aggressiveness of our competitors pricing strategies, which could force us to decrease prices in order to maintain market share; | |
| our failure to anticipate and respond to changing customer preferences; | |
| our inability to develop new, improved or enhanced products; and | |
| our inability to maintain the cost efficiency of our facilities. |
If we cannot effectively compete in the markets in which we
operate, our sales and operating results would be adversely
affected.
We may not be
able to develop new products acceptable to our
customers.
Our business strategy is market focused and includes investments
in developing new products to meet the changing needs of our
customers and to maintain our market share. Our success will
depend in large part on our ability to develop and introduce new
and enhanced products that keep pace with introductions by our
competitors and changing customer preferences. If we fail to
anticipate or respond adequately to these factors, we may lose
opportunities for business with both current and potential
customers. The success of our new product offerings will depend
on several factors, including our ability to:
| anticipate and properly identify our customers needs and industry trends; | |
| price our products competitively; | |
| develop and commercialize new products and applications in a timely manner; | |
| differentiate our products from our competitors products; and | |
| invest in research and development activities efficiently. |
Our inability to develop new products could adversely impact our
business and ultimately harm our profitability.
We are subject
to substantial costs and potential liability for environmental
matters.
We are subject to various environmental laws and regulations
that govern our operations, including discharges into the
environment, and the handling and disposal of hazardous
substances and wastes. We are also subject to laws and
regulations that impose liability and
clean-up
responsibility for releases of hazardous substances into the
environment. To comply with environmental laws and regulations,
we have incurred, and will continue to incur, substantial
capital and operating expenditures. We anticipate that
environmental regulation of our operations will continue to
become more burdensome and that capital and operating
expenditures necessary to comply with environmental regulations
will continue, and perhaps increase, in the future. Because
environmental regulations are not consistent worldwide, our
ability to compete globally may be adversely affected by capital
and operating expenditures required for environmental
compliance. In addition, we may incur obligations to remove or
mitigate any adverse effects on the environment, such as air and
water quality, resulting from mills we operate or have operated.
Potential obligations include compensation for the restoration
of natural resources, personal injury and property damages.
We have exposure to liability for remediation and other costs
related to the presence of polychlorinated biphenyls, or PCBs,
in the lower Fox River on which our former Neenah, Wisconsin
mill was located. We have financial reserves for environmental
matters but we cannot be certain that those reserves will be
adequate to provide for future obligations related to these
matters, that our share of costs
and/or
damages for these matters will not exceed our available
resources, or that such obligations will not have a long-term,
material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position,
liquidity or results of operations.
Our environmental issues are complicated and should be reviewed
in context; please see a more
-7-
GLATFELTER
Table of Contents
detailed discussion of these matters in Item 8
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
Note 20.
We have
operations in a potentially politically and economically
unstable location.
We own and operate a pulp mill in the Philippines where the
operating environment is unstable and subject to political
unrest. Our Philippine pulp mill produces abaca pulp, a
significant raw material used by our Composite Fibers business
unit. Our Philippine pulp mill is currently our main provider of
abaca pulp. There are limited suitable alternative sources of
readily available abaca pulp in the world. In the event of a
disruption in supply from our Philippine mill, there is no
guarantee that we could obtain adequate amounts of abaca pulp
from alternative sources at a reasonable price or at all. As a
consequence, any civil disturbance, unrest, political
instability or other event that causes a disruption in supply
could limit the availability of abaca pulp and would increase
our cost of obtaining abaca pulp. Such occurrences could
adversely impact our sales volumes, revenues and operating
results.
Our
international operations pose certain risks that may adversely
impact sales and earnings.
We have significant operations and assets located in Germany,
France, the United Kingdom, and the Philippines. Our
international sales and operations are subject to a number of
special risks, in addition to the risks in our domestic sales
and operations, including differing protections of intellectual
property, trade barriers, labor unrest, exchange controls,
regional economic uncertainty, differing (and possibly more
stringent) labor regulation, risk of governmental expropriation,
domestic and foreign customs and tariffs, differing regulatory
environments, difficulty in managing widespread operations and
political instability. These factors may adversely affect our
future profits. Also, in some foreign jurisdictions, we may be
subject to laws limiting the right and ability of entities
organized or operating therein to pay dividends or remit
earnings to affiliated companies unless specified conditions are
met. Any such limitations would restrict our flexibility in
using funds generated in those jurisdictions.
Foreign
currency exchange rate fluctuations could adversely affect our
results of operations.
We own and operate paper and pulp mills in Germany, France, the
United Kingdom and the Philippines. The majority of our business
is transacted in U.S. dollars, however, a substantial
portion of business is transacted in Euros, British Pound
Sterling and Canadian dollars. With respect to the Euro and
Canadian dollar, we generate substantially greater cash inflow
in these currencies than we do outflow. However, with respect to
the British Pound Sterling, we have greater outflows than
inflows of this currency. As a result of these positions, we are
exposed to changes in currency exchange rates.
Our ability to maintain our products price competitiveness
is reliant, in part, on the relative strength of the currency in
which the product is denominated compared to the currency of the
market into which it is sold and the functional currency of our
competitors. Changes in the rate of exchange of foreign
currencies in relation to the U.S. dollar, and other
currencies, may adversely impact our results of operations and
our ability to offer products in certain markets at acceptable
prices.
In the event
any of the above risk factors impact our business in a material
way or in combination during the same period, we may be unable
to generate sufficient cash flow to simultaneously fund our
operations, finance capital expenditures, satisfy obligations
and make dividend payments on our common stock.
In addition to debt service obligations, our business is capital
intensive and requires significant expenditures for equipment
maintenance, new or enhanced equipment, environmental
compliance, and research and development to support our business
strategies. We expect to meet all of our near and long-term cash
needs from a combination of operating cash flow, cash and cash
equivalents, our existing credit facility and other long-term
debt. If we are unable to generate sufficient cash flow from
these sources, we could be unable to meet our near and long-term
cash needs or make dividend payments.
ITEM 2 | PROPERTIES |
Our leased corporate offices are located in York, Pennsylvania.
We own and operate paper mills located in Pennsylvania; Ohio;
the United Kingdom; Germany; and France. Our metallized paper
production facility located in Caerphilly, Wales leases the
building and land associated with its operations. We also own
and operate a pulp mill in the Philippines. Substantially all of
the equipment used in our papermaking and related operations, is
also owned. All of our properties, other than those that are
leased, are free from any material liens or encumbrances. We
consider all of our buildings to be in good structural condition
and well maintained and our properties to be suitable and
adequate for present operations.
-8-
GLATFELTER
Table of Contents
The following table summarizes the estimated production capacity
of each of our facilities:
Estimated Annual Production |
||||||||||
Capacity (short tons) | ||||||||||
Specialty Papers
|
||||||||||
Spring Grove
|
332,000 | Uncoated | ||||||||
68,000 | Coated | |||||||||
Chillicothe
|
400,000 | Uncoated | ||||||||
7,500 | Coated | |||||||||
Composite Fibers
|
||||||||||
Gernsbach
|
40,000 | Lightweight | ||||||||
11,800 | Metallized | |||||||||
Scaër
|
6,000 | Lightweight | ||||||||
Lydney
|
16,800 | Lightweight | ||||||||
Caerphilly
|
17,000 | Metallized | ||||||||
Philippines
|
13,000 | Abaca pulp | ||||||||
The Spring Grove facility includes five uncoated paper machines
that have been rebuilt and modernized from time to time with the
capacity to produce 332,000 tons. It has an off-line combi-blade
coater and a Specialty Coater (S-Coater), which
together yield a potential annual production capacity for coated
paper of approximately 68,000 tons. Since uncoated paper is
used in producing coated paper, this is not additional capacity.
We view the S-Coater as an important asset that allows us to
expand our engineered paper products business. The Spring Grove
facility also includes a pulpmill that has a production capacity
of approximately 650 tons of bleached pulp per day.
The Chillicothe facility operates four paper machines which
together yield a potential annual production capacity of
uncoated and carbonless paper of approximately 400,000 tons. In
addition, this location produces 7,500 tons per year of
other coated paper. This facility also includes a pulpmill that
has a production capacity of approximately 955 tons of bleached
pulp per day.
The Composite Fibers business units four facilities
operate a combined ten papermaking machines with the capacity to
produce approximately 60,700 tons of lightweight paper on an
annual basis. In addition, the business unit has the capacity to
produce an aggregate of 27,500 tons of metallized papers
from its lacquering and metallizing operations in Gernsbach,
Germany and Caerphilly, Wales.
Our Philippines facility consists of a pulpmill that supplies a
majority of the abaca pulp requirements of the Composite Fibers
paper mills.
ITEM 3 | LEGAL PROCEEDINGS |
We are involved in various lawsuits that we consider to be
ordinary and incidental to our business. The ultimate outcome of
these lawsuits cannot be predicted with certainty; however, we
do not expect such lawsuits individually or in the aggregate,
will have a material adverse effect on our consolidated
financial position, liquidity or results of operations.
For a discussion of commitments, legal proceedings and related
contingencies, see Item 8 Financial Statements
and Supplementary Data Note 20.
ITEM 4 | SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS. |
Not Applicable no matters were submitted to a vote
of security holders during the fourth quarter of 2008.
EXECUTIVE
OFFICERS
The following table sets forth certain information with respect
to our executive officers as of March 5, 2009.
Name | Age | Office with the Company | ||||||
George H. Glatfelter II
|
57 | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer | ||||||
Dante C. Parrini
|
44 | Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer | ||||||
John P. Jacunski
|
43 | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer | ||||||
Thomas G. Jackson
|
43 | Vice President General Counsel and Corporate Secretary | ||||||
Debabrata Mukherjee
|
39 | Vice President and General Manager, Specialty Papers Business Unit | ||||||
Martin Rapp
|
49 | Vice President and General Manager, Composite Fibers Business Unit | ||||||
Mark A. Sullivan
|
54 | Vice President Global Supply Chain | ||||||
William T. Yanavitch II
|
48 | Vice President Human Resources and Administration | ||||||
David C. Elder
|
40 | Vice President and Corporate Controller | ||||||
Officers are elected to serve at the pleasure of the Board of
Directors. Except in the case of officers elected to fill a new
position or a vacancy occurring at some other date, officers are
generally elected at the organizational meeting of the Board of
Directors held immediately after the annual meeting of
shareholders.
George H. Glatfelter II is our Chairman and Chief
Executive Officer. From April 2000 to February 2001,
Mr. Glatfelter was Chairman, President and Chief Executive
Officer. From June 1998 to April 2000, he was Chief Executive
Officer and President.
Mr. Glatfelter serves as a director of Met-Pro Corporation.
Dante C. Parrini became Executive Vice President and
Chief Operating Officer in February 2005. Prior to this,
Mr. Parrini was Senior Vice President and General Manager,
a position he held since January 2003. From December 2000 until
January 2003, Mr. Parrini was Vice President
Sales and Marketing. From July 2000 to December 2000, he was
Vice President Sales and Marketing, Glatfelter
Division and Corporate Strategic Marketing.
-9-
GLATFELTER
Table of Contents
John P. Jacunski became Senior Vice President &
Chief Financial Officer in July 2006. From October 2003 until
July 2006, he was Vice President and Corporate Controller.
Mr. Jacunski was previously Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer at WCI Steel, Inc. from June 1999 to October
2003. Prior to joining WCI, Mr. Jacunski was with KPMG, an
international accounting and consulting firm, where he served in
various capacities.
Thomas G. Jackson became Vice President, General Counsel
and Secretary in June 2008. Prior to this, Mr. Jackson was
Assistant General Counsel, Assistant Secretary and Director of
Compliance a position he held since May 2007. From
November 2006 until May 2007, Mr. Jackson was Assistant
General Counsel for the Company. Prior to joining our company,
Mr. Jackson was Director of Business Development at
C&D Technologies, Inc. from August 2005 to September 2006
and prior to that was Deputy General Counsel at C&D
Technologies from October 1999 to August 2005.
Debabrata Mukherjee was appointed Vice
President & General Manager Specialty
Papers Business Unit in April 2008. Dr. Mukherjee joined
our Company in 1998 and since then has held various operational,
sales and technical leadership positions within the Specialty
Papers Business Unit. From March 2006 through March 2008,
Dr. Mukherjee served as Division Vice President,
Engineered & Converting Products. From February 2004
thru February 2006. Dr. Mukherjee served as Director,
Engineered Products. Prior to joining Glatfelter,
Dr. Mukherjee served in various capacities with Felix
Schoeller, a German based global specialty paper manufacturer.
Martin Rapp joined Glatfelter in August 2006 and serves
as Vice President and General Manager Composite
Fibers Business Unit. Prior to this, Mr. Rapp was Vice
President and General Manager of Avery Dennisons Roll
Materials Business in Central and Eastern Europe since August
2002. From May 2000 until July 2002 Mr. Rapp was Partner
and Managing Director of BonnConsult.
Mark A. Sullivan was appointed Vice President, Global
Supply Chain in February 2005. Mr. Sullivan joined our
company in December 2003, as Chief Procurement Officer. His
experience includes a broad array of operations and supply chain
management responsibilities during 20 years with the DuPont
Company. He served with
T-Mobile USA
as an independent contractor during 2003, and Concur
Technologies from 1999 until 2002.
William T. Yanavitch II rejoined the Company in May
2005 as Vice President Human Resources and Administration.
Mr. Yanavitch served as Vice President Human Resources from
July 2000 until his resignation in January 2005 at which time he
became Corporate Human Resources Manager of Constellation Energy.
David C. Elder was appointed Vice President in March 2009
and has served as Corporate Controller and Chief Accounting
Officer since July 2006. Prior to joining us in January 2006,
Mr. Elder was Corporate Controller for YORK International
Corporation, a position he held since December 2003. Prior
thereto, he was the Director, Financial Planning and Analysis
for YORK International Corporation from August 2000 to December
2003.
PART II
ITEM 5 | MARKET FOR THE REGISTRANTS COMMON STOCK AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES |
Common Stock Prices and Dividends Declared Information
The following table shows the high and low prices of our common
stock traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol
GLT and the dividend declared per share for each
quarter during the past two years.
Quarter | High | Low | Dividend | |||||||||||
2008
|
||||||||||||||
Fourth
|
$ | 13.69 | $ | 7.50 | $ | 0.09 | ||||||||
Third
|
15.76 | 12.51 | 0.09 | |||||||||||
Second
|
15.76 | 13.51 | 0.09 | |||||||||||
First
|
15.44 | 12.85 | 0.09 | |||||||||||
2007
|
||||||||||||||
Fourth
|
$ | 17.23 | $ | 14.00 | $ | 0.09 | ||||||||
Third
|
15.59 | 12.47 | 0.09 | |||||||||||
Second
|
16.30 | 12.92 | 0.09 | |||||||||||
First
|
18.05 | 14.86 | 0.09 | |||||||||||
As of March 5, 2009, we had 1,561 shareholders of
record.
-10-
GLATFELTER
Table of Contents
STOCK PERFORMANCE
GRAPH
The following graph compares the cumulative
5-year total
return of our common stock with the cumulative total returns of
both a peer group and a broad market index. The peer group
consists of AbitibiBowater, Inc., Neenah Paper, Inc.,
Schweitzer-Mauduit International and Wausau Paper Corp.
In addition, the chart includes a comparison to the Russell
2000, which we believe is an appropriate index for stocks such
as ours.
The graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common
stock, in each index, and in each of the peer groups (including
reinvestment of dividends) was $100 on December 31, 2003
and charts it through December 31, 2008.
ITEM 6 | SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA |
Summary of Selected Consolidated Financial Data
As of or for the year ended
December 31 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dollars in thousands, except per share | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | |||||||||||||||||||
Net sales
|
$ | 1,263,850 | $ | 1,148,323 | $ | 986,411 | $ | 579,121 | $ | 543,524 | ||||||||||||||
Energy sales, net
|
9,364 | 9,445 | 10,726 | 10,078 | 9,953 | |||||||||||||||||||
Total revenue
|
1,273,214 | 1,157,768 | 997,137 | 589,199 | 553,477 | |||||||||||||||||||
Reversal of (Shutdown and restructuring charges and unusual
items)
|
856 | (35 | ) | (30,318 | ) | (1,564 | ) | (20,375 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Gains on dispositions of plant, equipment and timberlands, net
|
18,468 | 78,685 | 17,394 | 22,053 | 58,509 | |||||||||||||||||||
Gains from insurance recoveries
|
| | 205 | 20,151 | 32,785 | |||||||||||||||||||
Net income (loss)
|
57,888 | 63,472 | (12,236 | ) | 38,609 | 56,102 | ||||||||||||||||||
Earnings (loss) per share
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Basic
|
1.28 | 1.41 | (0.27 | ) | 0.88 | 1.28 | ||||||||||||||||||
Diluted
|
1.27 | 1.40 | (0.27 | ) | 0.87 | 1.27 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total assets
|
1,057,309 | 1,287,067 | 1,225,643 | 1,044,977 | 1,052,270 | |||||||||||||||||||
Total debt
|
313,285 | 313,185 | 397,613 | 207,073 | 211,227 | |||||||||||||||||||
Shareholders equity
|
342,707 | 476,068 | 388,368 | 432,312 | 420,370 | |||||||||||||||||||
Cash dividends declared per common share
|
0.36 | 0.36 | 0.36 | 0.36 | 0.36 | |||||||||||||||||||
Shares outstanding
|
45,434 | 45,141 | 44,821 | 44,132 | 43,950 | |||||||||||||||||||
Capital expenditures
|
52,469 | 28,960 | 44,460 | 31,024 | 18,587 | |||||||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization
|
60,611 | 56,001 | 50,021 | 50,647 | 51,598 | |||||||||||||||||||
Tons sold
|
829,354 | 799,512 | 721,892 | 498,593 | 470,422 | |||||||||||||||||||
Number of employees
|
3,633 | 3,854 | 3,704 | 1,958 | 1,988 | |||||||||||||||||||
-11-
GLATFELTER
Table of Contents
ITEM 7 | MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS |
Forward-Looking Statements This Annual Report
on
Form 10-K
includes forward-looking statements within the meaning of the
Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. All statements
other than statements of historical fact, including statements
regarding industry prospects and future consolidated financial
position or results of operations, made in this Report on
Form 10-K
are forward looking. We use words such as
anticipates, believes,
expects, future, intends and
similar expressions to identify forward-looking statements.
Forward-looking statements reflect managements current
expectations and are inherently uncertain. Our actual results
may differ significantly from such expectations. The following
discussion includes forward-looking statements regarding
expectations of, among others, net sales, costs of products
sold, non-cash pension income, environmental costs, capital
expenditures and liquidity, all of which are inherently
difficult to predict. Although we make such statements based on
assumptions that we believe to be reasonable, there can be no
assurance that actual results will not differ materially from
our expectations. Accordingly, we identify the following
important factors, among others, which could cause our results
to differ from any results that might be projected, forecasted
or estimated in any such forward-looking statements:
i. | changes in the cost or availability of raw materials we use, in particular pulpwood, market pulp, pulp substitutes, caustic soda and abaca fiber; |
ii. | changes in energy-related costs and commodity raw materials with an energy component; |
iii. | variations in demand, including the impact of any unplanned market-related downtime, and the pricing of our products; |
iv. | our ability to develop new, high value-added Specialty Papers and Composite Fibers products; |
v. | our ability to renew our electricity sales agreement at acceptable margins in relation to our current coal supply contract; |
vi. | the impact of competition, changes in industry paper production capacity, including the construction of new mills, the closing of mills and incremental changes due to capital expenditures or productivity increases; |
vii. | the impairment of financial institutions as a result of the current credit market conditions and any resulting impact on us, our customers, or our vendors; |
viii. | the gain or loss of significant customers and/or on-going viability of such customers; |
ix. | cost and other effects of environmental compliance, cleanup, damages, remediation or restoration, or personal injury or property damages related thereto, such as the costs of natural resource restoration or damages related to the presence of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) in the lower Fox River on which our former Neenah mill was located; |
x. | risks associated with our international operations, including local economic and political environments and fluctuations in currency exchange rates; |
xi. | geopolitical events, including war and terrorism; |
xii. | enactment of adverse state, federal or foreign tax or other legislation or changes in government policy or regulation; |
xiii. | adverse results in litigation; and |
xiv. | our ability to finance, consummate and integrate future acquisitions. |
Introduction We manufacture, both domestically
and internationally, a wide array of specialty papers and
engineered products. Substantially all of our revenue is earned
from the sale of our products to customers in numerous markets,
including book publishing, envelope and converting, carbonless
papers and forms, food and beverage, decorative laminates for
furniture and flooring, and other highly technical niche markets.
Overview Our results of operations for 2008
when compared with 2007 reflect improved pricing conditions and
increased shipping volumes in each of our business units.
However, each of our business units results in the
comparison was adversely impacted by significantly higher input
costs that offset, to a large degree, the benefits from higher
selling prices.
Specialty Papers operating income in 2008 increased
approximately 45% compared to 2007 largely due to initiatives
taken to improve the operational effectiveness and overall
profitability of the Chillicothe facility.
Net sales in our Composite Fibers business unit increased 24%
primarily due to the 2007 Caerphilly acquisition, foreign
currency translation and higher selling prices. However,
operating income decreased 3.5% in 2008 compared to 2007.
The results of operations in 2007 include $26 million of
pre-tax charges related to our estimated costs associated with
the Fox River environmental matter. The results also include
approximately $5.7 million of income tax benefits recorded
as a result of a change in the German corporate income tax rate.
-12-
GLATFELTER
Table of Contents
As part of our strategy to monetize the value of our
timberlands, we completed sales of these assets generating
proceeds of $19.3 million and $84.4 million in 2008
and 2007 respectively. We also monetized a $43.2 million
note received in 2007 as consideration for the sale of
timberlands by pledging this asset to secure a
$36.7 million borrowing. Proceeds from the new borrowing
were used to reduce outstanding debt.
RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS
2008 versus
2007
The following table sets forth summarized results of operations:
Year Ended December 31 | ||||||||||||
In thousands, except per share | 2008 | 2007 | ||||||||||
Net sales
|
$ | 1,263,850 | $ | 1,148,323 | ||||||||
Gross profit
|
177,782 | 156,312 | ||||||||||
Operating income
|
99,209 | 118,818 | ||||||||||
Net income
|
57,888 | 63,472 | ||||||||||
Earnings per diluted share
|
1.27 | 1.40 | ||||||||||
The consolidated results of operations for the years ended
December 31, 2008 and 2007 include the following
non-routine items:
After-tax |
||||||||||
In thousands, except per share | Income (loss) | Diluted EPS | ||||||||
2008
|
||||||||||
Gains on sale of timberlands
|
$ | 10,984 | $ | 0.24 | ||||||
Reversal of shutdown and restructuring charges
|
517 | 0.01 | ||||||||
Acquisition integration costs
|
(889 | ) | (0.02 | ) | ||||||
2007
|
||||||||||
Gains on sale of timberlands
|
$ | 44,052 | $ | 0.97 | ||||||
Environmental remediation
|
(15,979 | ) | (0.35 | ) | ||||||
Acquisition integration costs
|
(1,569 | ) | (0.03 | ) | ||||||
These items increased earnings by $10.6 million, or $0.23
per diluted share in 2008. Comparatively, the items identified
above increased earnings in 2007 by $26.5 million, or $0.59
per diluted share.
Business Units Results of individual business
units are presented based on our management accounting practices
and management structure. There is no comprehensive,
authoritative body of guidance for management accounting
equivalent to accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America; therefore, the financial results of
individual business units are not necessarily comparable with
similar information for any other company. The management
accounting process uses assumptions and allocations to measure
performance of the business units. Methodologies are refined
from time to time as management accounting practices are
enhanced and businesses change. The costs incurred by support
areas not directly aligned with the business unit are allocated
primarily based on an estimated utilization of support area
services or are included in Other and Unallocated in
the table below.
Management evaluates results of operations of the business units
before non-cash pension income, charges related to the Fox River
environmental reserves, restructuring related charges, unusual
items, certain corporate level costs, effects of asset
dispositions and insurance recoveries because it believes this
is a more meaningful representation of the operating performance
of its core papermaking businesses, the profitability of
business units and the extent of cash flow generated from core
operations. Such amounts are presented under the caption
Other and Unallocated. This presentation is aligned
with the management and operating structure of our company. It
is also on this basis that the Companys performance is
evaluated internally and by the Companys Board of
Directors.
Business Unit Performance |
Year Ended December 31 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
In thousands, except tons | Specialty Papers | Composite Fibers | Other and Unallocated | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | 2008 | 2007 | 2008 | 2007 | 2008 | 2007 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net sales
|
$ | 833,899 | $ | 802,293 | $ | 429,952 | $ | 346,030 | $ | (1 | ) | $ | | $ | 1,263,850 | $ | 1,148,323 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Energy sales, net
|
9,364 | 9,445 | | | | | 9,364 | 9,445 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total revenue
|
843,263 | 811,738 | 429,952 | 346,030 | $ | (1 | ) | | 1,273,214 | 1,157,768 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cost of products sold
|
739,481 | 721,216 | 366,791 | 287,606 | (10,840 | ) | (7,366 | ) | 1,095,432 | 1,001,456 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gross profit
|
103,782 | 90,522 | 63,161 | 58,424 | 10,839 | 7,366 | 177,782 | 156,312 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
SG&A
|
54,596 | 56,561 | 38,206 | 32,541 | 5,095 | 27,042 | 97,897 | 116,144 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shutdown and restructuring charges
|
| | | | (856 | ) | 35 | (856 | ) | 35 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gains on dispositions of plant, equipment and timberlands
|
| | | | (18,468 | ) | (78,685 | ) | (18,468 | ) | (78,685 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total operating income
|
49,186 | 33,961 | 24,955 | 25,883 | 25,068 | 58,974 | 99,209 | 118,818 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Non operating income (expense)
|
| | | | (18,183 | ) | (24,884 | ) | (18,183 | ) | (24,884 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Income before income taxes
|
$ | 49,186 | $ | 33,961 | $ | 24,955 | $ | 25,883 | $ | 6,885 | $ | 34,090 | $ | 81,026 | $ | 93,934 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Supplementary Data
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net tons sold
|
743,755 | 726,657 | 85,599 | 72,855 | | | 829,354 | 799,512 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Depreciation, depletion and amortization
|
$ | 35,010 | $ | 34,882 | $ | 25,601 | $ | 21,119 | $ | | $ | | $ | 60,611 | $ | 56,001 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Capital expenditures
|
20,878 | 17,395 | 31,591 | 11,565 | | | 52,469 | 28,960 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
-13-
GLATFELTER
Table of Contents
Sales and Costs
of Products Sold
Year Ended December 31 | ||||||||||||||||
In thousands | 2008 | 2007 | Change | |||||||||||||
Net sales
|
$ | 1,263,850 | $ | 1,148,323 | $ | 115,527 | ||||||||||
Energy sales net
|
9,364 | 9,445 | (81 | ) | ||||||||||||
Total revenues
|
1,273,214 | 1,157,768 | 115,446 | |||||||||||||
Costs of products sold
|
1,095,432 | 1,001,456 | 93,976 | |||||||||||||
Gross profit
|
$ | 177,782 | $ | 156,312 | $ | 21,470 | ||||||||||
Gross profit as a percent of Net sales
|
14.1 | % | 13.6 | % | ||||||||||||
The following table sets forth the contribution to consolidated
net sales by each business unit:
Percent of total | ||||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | |||||||||||
Business Unit
|
||||||||||||
Specialty Papers
|
66.0 | % | 69.9 | % | ||||||||
Composite Fibers
|
34.0 | 30.1 | ||||||||||
Total
|
100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | ||||||||
Net sales totaled $1,263.9 million for
the year ended December 31, 2008, an increase of
$115.5 million, or 10.1%, compared to the previous year.
In the Specialty Papers business unit, net sales for 2008
increased $31.6 million to $833.9 million and
operating income totaled $49.2 million, an increase of
$15.2 million over the previous year. The improved
operating income is primarily due to progress achieved in
executing Chillicothes profit improvement initiatives and
improved operating efficiencies. Higher average selling prices
contributed $36.4 million of the increase in net sales and
volumes shipped increased 2.4%. These price and volume increases
were partially offset by expected mix changes between carbonless
papers and uncoated papers, as well as lower sales of scrap
paper. The benefits of higher average selling prices were offset
by $37.7 million of higher costs, largely driven by fiber
and energy. Unplanned operating downtime at the Spring Grove and
Chillicothe facilities also reduced operating results by
$4.3 million in 2008 compared to 2007.
In Composite Fibers, net sales were $430.0 million for
2008, an increase of $83.9 million from the previous year.
The completion of the November 30, 2007 Caerphilly
acquisition accounted for $40.9 million of the increase in
net sales, the translation of foreign currencies benefited net
sales by $14.4 million and higher average selling prices
contributed $16.3 million. Total volumes shipped by this
business unit increased 17.5%, including a 4.3% increase in
Food & Beverage paper product shipments. Shipments of
Composite Laminates were down 1.5% primarily due to the weak
housing and related markets.
Energy and raw material costs in the Composite Fibers business
unit were $17.1 million higher than a year ago, increasing
at a rate faster than average selling prices. Operating income
for Composite Fibers declined $0.9 million in the
comparison and totaled $25.0 million for 2008. During 2008,
this units results were adversely impacted by an aggregate
of $6.2 million due to operating issues, market related
downtime and accelerated depreciation related to completed or
planned machine upgrades.
Non-Cash Pension Income Non-cash pension
income resulted from the over-funded status of our pension
plans. The following summarizes non-cash pension income for 2008
compared to 2007:
Year Ended December 31 | ||||||||||||||||
In thousands | 2008 | 2007 | Change | |||||||||||||
Recorded as:
|
||||||||||||||||
Costs of products sold
|
$ | 11,067 | $ | 8,846 | $ | 2,221 | ||||||||||
SG&A expense
|
4,995 | 4,050 | 945 | |||||||||||||
Total
|
$ | 16,062 | $ | 12,896 | $ | 3,166 | ||||||||||
The amount of pension income recognized each year is determined
using various actuarial assumptions and certain other factors,
including the fair value of our pension assets as of the
beginning of the year. As discussed in Item 8
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
Note 11, the fair value of the plans assets has
declined approximately 34% since the beginning of 2008.
Accordingly, during 2009 we expect to recognize net pension
expense totaling approximately $6 million, pre-tax.
Selling, general and administrative
(SG&A) expenses decreased
$18.2 million in the year-to-year comparison and totaled
$97.9 million in 2008 compared to $116.1 million a
year ago. The decrease was primarily due to a $26.0 million
charge for the Fox River environmental matter in 2007 partially
offset by the inclusion in 2008 of a full years result for
the Caerphilly acquisition.
Gain on Sales of Plant, Equipment and
Timberlands During 2008 and 2007, we completed
sales of timberlands which are included in the following table:
Dollars in thousands | Acres | Proceeds | Gain | |||||||||||||
2008
|
||||||||||||||||
Timberlands
|
4,561 | $ | 19,279 | $ | 18,649 | |||||||||||
Other
|
n/a | | (181 | ) | ||||||||||||
Total
|
$ | 19,279 | $ | 18,468 | ||||||||||||
2007
|
||||||||||||||||
Timberlands
|
37,448 | $ | 84,409 | $ | 78,958 | |||||||||||
Other
|
n/a | 377 | (273 | ) | ||||||||||||
Total
|
$ | 84,786 | $ | 78,685 | ||||||||||||
In connection with each of the asset sales set forth above, we
received cash proceeds with the exception of the sale of
approximately 26,000 acres of timberland completed in
November 2007. As consideration for the timberland sold in this
transaction, we received a $43.2 million,
20-year
interest-bearing note due from the
-14-
GLATFELTER
Table of Contents
buyer, Glawson Investments Corp. (Glawson), a
Georgia corporation, and GIC Investments LLC, a Delaware limited
liability company owned by Glawson. The note receivable is fully
secured by a letter of credit issued by The Royal Bank of
Scotland plc. In January 2008, we monetized this note receivable
by pledging it as collateral for a new $36.7 million term
note payable.
Income taxes During 2008, we recorded income
tax expense totaling $23.1 million on pre tax income of
$81.0 million. The comparable amounts in 2007 were income
taxes of $30.5 million on a taxable income of
$93.9 million. The effective rate in 2007 included a
$5.7 million deferred income tax benefit related to the
reduction of German corporate income tax rates passed into law
July 2007. Overall, the decline in the effective tax rate from
2007 to 2008 was primarily due to higher gains from timberland
sales in the prior year which are taxed at a higher rate.
Foreign Currency We own and operate paper and
pulp mills in Germany, France, the United Kingdom and the
Philippines. The functional currency in Germany and France is
the Euro, in the UK it is the British Pound Sterling, and in the
Philippines it is the Peso. During 2008, Euro functional
currency operations generated approximately 20.6% of our sales
and 19.9% of operating expenses and British Pound Sterling
operations represented 10.6% of net sales and 11.2% of operating
expenses. The translation of the results from international
operations into U.S. dollars is subject to changes in
foreign currency exchange rates. The table below summarizes the
translation impact on reported results that changes in currency
exchange rates had on our
non-U.S. based
operations from the conversion of these operations results:
Year Ended |
||||||
In thousands | December 31 | |||||
Favorable |
||||||
(unfavorable) | ||||||
Net sales
|
$ | 14,360 | ||||
Costs of products sold
|
(10,435 | ) | ||||
SG&A expenses
|
(855 | ) | ||||
Income taxes and other
|
(1,033 | ) | ||||
Net income
|
$ | 2,037 | ||||
The above table only presents the financial reporting impact of
foreign currency translations. It does not present the impact of
certain competitive advantages or disadvantages of operating or
competing in multi-currency markets.
RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS
2007 versus
2006
The following table sets forth summarized results of operations:
Year Ended December 31 | ||||||||||||
In thousands, except per share | 2007 | 2006 | ||||||||||
Net sales
|
$ | 1,148,323 | $ | 986,411 | ||||||||
Gross profit
|
156,312 | 105,294 | ||||||||||
Operating income
|
118,818 | 94 | ||||||||||
Net income (loss)
|
63,472 | (12,236 | ) | |||||||||
Earnings (loss) per diluted share
|
1.40 | (0.27 | ) | |||||||||
The consolidated results of operations for the years ended
December 31, 2007 and 2006 include the following
significant items:
After-tax |
||||||||||
In thousands, except per share | Income (loss) | Diluted EPS | ||||||||
2007
|
||||||||||
Gains on sale of timberlands
|
$ | 44,052 | $ | 0.97 | ||||||
Environmental remediation
|
(15,979 | ) | (0.35 | ) | ||||||
Acquisition integration costs
|
(1,569 | ) | (0.03 | ) | ||||||
2006
|
||||||||||
Gains on sale of timberlands
|
8,812 | 0.20 | ||||||||
Shutdown and restructuring charges
|
(35,212 | ) | (0.79 | ) | ||||||
Acquisition integration costs
|
(8,647 | ) | (0.19 | ) | ||||||
Debt redemption premium
|
(1,820 | ) | (0.04 | ) | ||||||
Insurance recoveries
|
130 | | ||||||||
These items increased earnings by $26.5 million, or $0.59
per diluted share in 2007. Comparatively, the items identified
above decreased earnings in 2006 by $36.7 million, or $0.82
per diluted share.
-15-
GLATFELTER
Table of Contents
Business Units The following table sets forth
profitability information by business unit and the composition
of consolidated income from continuing operations before income
taxes:
Year Ended December 31 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
In thousands, except tons | Specialty Papers | Composite Fibers | Other and Unallocated | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2007 | 2006 | 2007 | 2006 | 2007 | 2006 | 2007 | 2006 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net sales
|
$ | 802,293 | $ | 693,660 | $ | 346,030 | $ | 292,751 | $ | | $ | | $ | 1,148,323 | $ | 986,411 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Energy sales, net
|
9,445 | 10,726 | | | | | 9,445 | 10,726 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total revenue
|
811,738 | 704,386 | 346,030 | 292,751 | | | 1,157,768 | 997,137 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cost of products sold
|
721,216 | 635,143 | 287,606 | 246,797 | (7,366 | ) | 9,903 | 1,001,456 | 891,843 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gross profit
|
90,522 | 69,243 | 58,424 | 45,954 | 7,366 | (9,903 | ) | 156,312 | 105,294 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
SG&A
|
56,561 | 50,285 | 32,541 | 28,458 | 27,042 | 13,738 | 116,144 | 92,481 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Restructuring charges
|
| | | | 35 | 30,318 | 35 | 30,318 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gains on dispositions of plant, equipment and timberlands
|
| | | | (78,685 | ) | (17,394 | ) | (78,685 | ) | (17,394 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gain on insurance recoveries
|
| | | | (205 | ) | | (205 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total operating income (loss)
|
33,961 | 18,958 | 25,883 | 17,496 | 58,974 | (36,360 | ) | 118,818 | 94 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Nonoperating income (expense)
|
| | | | (24,884 | ) | (22,322 | ) | (24,884 | ) | (22,322 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes
|
$ | 33,961 | $ | 18,958 | $ | 25,883 | $ | 17,496 | $ | 34,090 | $ | (58,682 | ) | $ | 93,934 | $ | (22,228 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Supplementary Data
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net tons sold
|
726,657 | 653,734 | 72,855 | 68,148 | | 10 | 799,512 | 721,892 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Depreciation expense
|
$ | 34,882 | $ | 32,824 | $ | 21,119 | $ | 17,197 | $ | | $ | | $ | 56,001 | $ | 50,021 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Capital expenditures
|
17,395 | 36,484 | 11,565 | 7,976 | | | 28,960 | 44,460 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sales and Costs
of Products Sold
Year Ended December 31 | ||||||||||||||||
In thousands | 2007 | 2006 | Change | |||||||||||||
Net sales
|
$ | 1,148,323 | $ | 986,411 | $ | 161,912 | ||||||||||
Energy sales net
|
9,445 | 10,726 | (1,281 | ) | ||||||||||||
Total revenues
|
1,157,768 | 997,137 | 160,631 | |||||||||||||
Costs of products sold
|
1,001,456 | 891,843 | 109,613 | |||||||||||||
Gross profit
|
$ | 156,312 | $ | 105,294 | $ | 51,018 | ||||||||||
Gross profit as a percent of Net sales
|
13.6 | % | 10.7 | % | ||||||||||||
The following table sets forth the contribution to consolidated
net sales by each business unit:
Percent of total | ||||||||||||
2007 | 2006 | |||||||||||
Business Unit
|
||||||||||||
Specialty Papers
|
69.9 | % | 70.3 | % | ||||||||
Composite Fibers
|
30.1 | 29.7 | ||||||||||
Total
|
100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | ||||||||
Net sales totaled $1.1 billion in 2007,
an increase of $161.9 million, or 16.4%, compared to the
previous year.
In the Specialty Papers business unit, net sales increased
$108.6 million to $802.3 million and operating income
totaled $34.0 million, an increase of $15.0 million
over the previous year. The increase in net sales is
attributable to the Chillicothe acquisition that was completed
April 3, 2006 and an overall favorable pricing environment
that contributed a $16.1 million benefit in 2007 with
prices increasing in all product markets. Shipping volumes
increased 11% in the comparison. Specialty Papers
production costs increased in the comparison primarily due to
higher shipping volumes. Higher raw material prices largely
driven by energy and pulp, and wood material usage adversely
impacted production costs by $19.2 million. These adverse
factors were partially offset by improved material usage and
machine yields.
In Composite Fibers, net sales were $346.0 million in 2007,
an increase of $53.3 million from the prior year and
operating income totaled $25.9 million, an increase of
$8.4 million in the comparison. The completion of the
March 13, 2006 Lydney acquisition accounted for
approximately $17.5 million of the increase in net sales
and the translation of foreign currencies benefitted net sales
by $19.6 million. On a constant currency basis, average
selling prices increased on average 0.3% and volumes increased
approximately 7% with increases realized in food and beverage,
technical specialties and metallized product markets. Energy and
raw material costs in this business unit were $3.2 million
higher than a year ago.
The reported amounts of costs of products sold in 2006 included
a $25.4 million charge for inventory write-downs and
accelerated depreciation on property and equipment abandoned in
connection with the Neenah facility shutdown. In the preceding
Business Unit Performance table, this amount is included in the
Other and Unallocated column.
Non-Cash Pension Income Non-cash pension
income results from the net over-funded status of our pension
plans. The amount of pension income recognized each year is
determined using various actuarial assumptions and certain other
factors, including the fair value of our pension assets as of
the beginning of the year. The following summarizes non-cash
pension income, before
-16-
GLATFELTER
Table of Contents
the curtailment charges recorded in connection with the Neenah
shutdown during 2006:
Year Ended December 31 | ||||||||||||||||
In thousands | 2007 | 2006 | Change | |||||||||||||
Recorded as:
|
||||||||||||||||
Costs of products sold
|
$ | 8,846 | $ | 15,480 | $ | (6,634 | ) | |||||||||
SG&A expense
|
4,050 | 1,513 | 2,537 | |||||||||||||
Total
|
$ | 12,896 | $ | 16,993 | $ | (4,097 | ) | |||||||||
Selling, general and administrative
(SG&A) expenses increased
$23.7 million in the year-to-year comparison and totaled
$116.1 million in 2007 compared to $92.5 million a
year ago. The increase was due to a $26.0 million charge
for the Fox River environmental matter and the inclusion of a
full years results for the Chillicothe and Lydney
acquisitions in the current periods results. These
unfavorable factors were partially offset in the comparison by
$12.2 million of lower acquisition integration costs.
Gain on Sales of Plant, Equipment and
Timberlands During 2007 and 2006 we completed
sales of timberlands. The following table summarizes these
transactions:
Dollars in thousands | Acres | Proceeds | Gain | |||||||||||||
2007
|
||||||||||||||||
Timberlands
|
37,448 | $ | 84,409 | $ | 78,958 | |||||||||||
Other
|
n/a | 377 | (273 | ) | ||||||||||||
Total
|
$ | 84,786 | $ | 78,685 | ||||||||||||
2006
|
||||||||||||||||
Timberlands
|
5,923 | $ | 17,130 | $ | 15,677 | |||||||||||
Other
|
n/a | 3,941 | 1,717 | |||||||||||||
Total
|
$ | 21,071 | $ | 17,394 | ||||||||||||
In connection with each of the asset sales set forth above, we
received cash proceeds with the exception of the sale of
approximately 26,000 acres of timberland completed in
November 2007. As consideration for the timberland sold in this
transaction we received a $43.2 million,
20-year
interest-bearing note due from the buyer, Glawson Investments
Corp. (Glawson), a Georgia corporation, and GIC
Investments LLC, a Delaware limited liability company owned by
Glawson. The note receivable is fully secured by a letter of
credit issued by The Royal Bank of Scotland plc. In January
2008, we monetized this note receivable by pledging it as
collateral for a new $36.7 million term note payable.
Shutdown and Restructuring Charges Neenah
Facility Shutdown In connection with our
agreement to acquire the Chillicothe operations, we permanently
closed the Neenah, WI facility. Production at this facility
ceased effective June 30, 2006 and certain products
previously manufactured at the Neenah facility have been
transferred to Chillicothe. Results of operations in 2006
included charges totaling $54.4 million including the
$25.4 million charge to cost of goods discussed previously.
The remaining reserve as of December 31, 2006 associated
with this restructuring initiative totaled $2.8 million.
During 2007, we made payments totaling $1.7 million; thus,
the remaining reserve balance was $1.1 million at
December 31, 2007.
Non-operating income (expense) During April
2006, we completed the placement of a $200 million bond
offering, the proceeds of which were used to redeem the then
outstanding $150 million notes scheduled to mature in July
2007. In connection with the early redemption, a charge of
$2.9 million, related to a redemption premium and the
write-off of unamortized debt issuance costs, was recorded in
Consolidated Statement of Income as Non-operating expense under
the caption
Other-net.
Income taxes During 2007, we recorded income
tax expense totaling $30.5 million on pre tax income of
$93.9 million. The comparable amounts in 2006 were income
tax benefits of $10.0 million on a pre-tax loss of
$22.2 million. For 2007, income tax expense is net of a
$5.7 million deferred income tax benefit related to the
reduction of German corporate income tax rates passed into law
July 2007.
Foreign Currency We own and operate paper and
pulp mills in Germany, France, the United Kingdom and the
Philippines. The functional currency in Germany and France is
the Euro, in the UK it is the British Pound Sterling, and in the
Philippines is the Peso. During 2007, Euro functional currency
operations generated approximately 19.9% of our sales and 18.8%
of operating expenses and British Pound Sterling operations
represented 7.6% of net sales and 7.8% of operating expenses.
The translation of the results from international operations
into U.S. dollars is subject to changes in foreign currency
exchange rates. The table below summarizes the translation
impact on reported results that changes in currency exchange
rates had on our
non-U.S. based
operations from the conversion of these operations results:
Year Ended |
||||||
In thousands | December 31 | |||||
Favorable |
||||||
(unfavorable) | ||||||
Net sales
|
$ | 19,563 | ||||
Costs of products sold
|
(17,952 | ) | ||||
SG&A expenses
|
(1,927 | ) | ||||
Income taxes and other
|
79 | |||||
Net loss
|
$ | (237 | ) | |||
The above table only presents the financial reporting impact of
foreign currency translations. It does not present the impact of
certain competitive advantages or
-17-
GLATFELTER
Table of Contents
disadvantages of operating or competing in multi-currency
markets.
LIQUIDITY AND
CAPITAL RESOURCES
Our business is capital intensive and requires significant
expenditures for new or enhanced equipment, for environmental
compliance matters, to support our research and development
efforts and for our business strategy. In addition we have
mandatory debt service requirements of both principal and
interest. The following table summarizes cash flow information
for each of the years presented:
Year Ended December 31 | ||||||||||||
In thousands | 2008 | 2007 | ||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
$ | 29,833 | $ | 21,985 | ||||||||
Cash provided by (used for)
|
||||||||||||
Operating activities
|
53,425 | 100,332 | ||||||||||
Investing activities
|
(33,190 | ) | 4,733 | |||||||||
Financing activities
|
(12,879 | ) | (99,371 | ) | ||||||||
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash
|
(4,955 | ) | 2,154 | |||||||||
Net cash provided
|
2,401 | 7,848 | ||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
|
$ | 32,234 | $ | 29,833 | ||||||||
Operating cash flow declined by $46.9 million in the
comparison as stronger overall gross profit was offset by higher
levels of working capital. Accounts receivable were higher
reflecting higher shipping volumes and selling prices. Overall
inventory levels were lower, however higher input costs and
replenishment of key raw materials at year end 2008 used
approximately $10.0 million. In addition, cash paid for
income taxes increased $17.4 million in 2008 compared to
2007 and we used approximately $13.0 million in connection
with the Fox River and Ecusta environmental matters.
Net cash used for investing activities increased in the
comparison primarily due to a $23.5 million increase in
capital expenditures, which includes an investment of
approximately $11 million to upgrade the capabilities of
one of our inclined wire paper machines in Germany. In addition,
the increase in net cash used for investing activities reflects
$22.3 million less in proceeds from timberland sales in
2008 than in 2007. In 2009, capital expenditures are expected to
be reduced to approximately $35 million reflecting our
decision, in light of current economic conditions, to delay most
discretionary spending.
During 2008 and 2007, cash dividends paid on common stock
totaled approximately $16.5 million and $16.4 million,
respectively. Our Board of Directors determines what, if any,
dividends will be paid to our shareholders. Dividend payment
decisions are based upon then-existing factors and conditions
and, therefore, historical trends of dividend payments are not
necessarily indicative of future payments.
During 2008, net debt, defined as total debt less term notes
secured by letters of credit and less cash balances, declined
$39.0 million to $210.4 million as proceeds from
operations and timberland sales were used to reduce debt
outstanding. Our Term loan, due in April 2011 has mandatory
quarterly repayment requirements approximating $3.4 million
per quarter in 2009.
During 2008, $13 million of required principal payments
were made under our Term Loan. In 2009, we are required to make
$13.8 million of quarterly principal repayments. The
following table sets forth our outstanding long-term
indebtedness:
December 31 | ||||||||||||
In thousands | 2008 | 2007 | ||||||||||
Revolving credit facility, due April 2011
|
$ | 6,724 | $ | 35,049 | ||||||||
Term loan, due April 2011
|
30,000 | 43,000 | ||||||||||
71/8% Notes,
due May 2016
|
200,000 | 200,000 | ||||||||||
2008 Term Loan, due January 2013
|
36,695 | - | ||||||||||
Note payable, due March 2013
|
34,000 | 34,000 | ||||||||||
Total long-term debt
|
307,419 | 312,049 | ||||||||||
Less current portion
|
(13,759 | ) | (11,008 | ) | ||||||||
Long-term debt, excluding current portion
|
$ | 293,660 | $ | 301,041 | ||||||||
The significant terms of the debt instruments are more fully
discussed in
Item 8-
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
Note 17.
In January 2008, we monetized a note received as consideration
from the sale of timberlands. In this transaction, we entered
into a new $36.7 million term loan agreement (the
2008 Term Loan) with a financial institution. The
2008 Term Loan matures in five years, bears interest at a
six-month reserve adjusted LIBOR plus a margin rate of 1.20% per
annum. This is secured by, among other assets, a
$43.2 million note received from the buyers of certain
timberland sold in November 2007. For a more complete
description of the 2008 Term Loan, refer to Note 17.
In January 2009, we used $6.5 million to satisfy a
commitment we had to fund certain Fox River remediation
activities. For complete details of this obligation, refer to
Item 8 Financial Statements, Note 20.
We are subject to loss contingencies resulting from regulation
by various federal, state, local and foreign governmental
authorities with respect to the environmental impact of mills we
operate, or have operated. To comply with environmental laws and
regulations, we have incurred substantial capital and operating
expenditures in past years. We anticipate that environmental
regulation of our operations will continue to be burdensome and
that capital and operating expenditures necessary to comply with
environmental regulations will continue, and perhaps increase,
in the future. In addition, we may incur obligations to remove
or mitigate any adverse effects on the environment resulting
from our
-18-
GLATFELTER
Table of Contents
operations, including the restoration of natural resources and
liability for personal injury and for damages to property and
natural resources. See Item 8 Financial
Statements and Supplementary Data Note 20 for a
summary of significant environmental matters.
We expect to meet all of our near and long-term cash needs from
a combination of operating cash flow, cash and cash equivalents,
and our existing credit facilities. However, as discussed in
Item 8 Financial Statements and Supplementary
Data Note 20, an unfavorable outcome of various
environmental matters could have a material adverse impact on
our consolidated financial position, liquidity
and/or
results of operations.
Our credit agreement, as amended, contains a number of customary
compliance covenants. In addition, the
71/8% Notes
contain a cross default provision that in the event of a default
under the credit agreement, the
71/8% Notes
would become currently due. As of December 31, 2008, we met
all of the requirements of our debt covenants.
Off-Balance-Sheet Arrangements As of
December 31, 2008 and 2007, we had not entered into any
off-balance-sheet arrangements. Financial derivative instruments
to which we are a party and guarantees of indebtedness, which
solely consist of obligations of subsidiaries and a partnership,
are reflected in the condensed consolidated balance sheets
included herein in Item 8 Financial Statements
and Supplementary Data.
Contractual Obligations The following table sets forth
contractual obligations as of December 31, 2008.
Payments Due During the Year |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||||
2010 to |
2012 to |
2014 and |
||||||||||||||||||||
In millions | Total | 2009 | 2011 | 2013 | beyond | |||||||||||||||||
Long-term
debt(1)
|
$ | 422 | $ | 31 | $ | 56 | $ | 102 | $ | 233 | ||||||||||||
Operating
leases(2)
|
22 | 7 | 5 | 2 | 8 | |||||||||||||||||
Purchase
obligations(3)
|
178 | 130 | 48 | | | |||||||||||||||||
Other long term
obligations(4),(5)
|
104 | 11 | 19 | 18 | 56 | |||||||||||||||||
Total
|
$ | 726 | $ | 179 | $ | 128 | $ | 122 | $ | 297 | ||||||||||||
(1) | Represents principal and interest payments due on long-term debt. We have $200.0 million of debt maturing in May 2016 and bearing a fixed rate of interest at 71/8%, payable semiannually, a $36.7 million note maturing in January 2013 bearing interest at six-month reserve adjusted LIBOR plus a margin rate of 1.20% per annum, and a $34.0 million note maturing in March 2013 and bearing a fixed rate of interest of 3.10%. In addition, at December 31, 2008, $6.7 million was outstanding under our revolving credit facility and $30 million was outstanding under a term loan. Both the revolving credit facility and the term loan bear a variable interest rate (3.03% and 2.34%, respectively, as of December 31, 2008) and mature in April 2011. | |
(2) | Represents rental agreements for various land buildings, and computer and office equipment. | |
(3) | Represents open purchase order commitments and other obligations, primarily for raw material forward purchases and pulpwood contracts with minimum annual purchase obligations. In certain situations, prices are subject to variations based on market prices. In such situations, the information above is based on prices in effect at December 31, 2008 or expectations based on historical experience and/or current market conditions. | |
(4) | Primarily represents expected benefits to be paid pursuant to medical retirement plans and nonqualified pension plans over the next ten years and expected costs of asset retirement obligations. | |
(5) | Since we are unable to reasonably estimate the timing of ultimate payment, the amounts set forth above do not include any payments that may be made related to uncertain tax positions, including potential interest, accounted for in accordance with FASB Interpretation No. 48. As discussed in more detail in Item 8 Financial Statements, Note 9, Income Taxes, such amounts totaled $29.2 million at December 31, 2008. |
-19-
GLATFELTER
Table of Contents
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates The
preceding discussion and analysis of our consolidated financial
position and results of operations is based upon our
consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in
accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America. The preparation of these consolidated
financial statements requires us to make estimates and
assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets,
liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosures of
contingent assets and liabilities. On an on-going basis, we
evaluate our estimates, including those related to inventories,
long-lived assets, pension and post-retirement obligations,
environmental liabilities and income taxes. We base our
estimates on historical experience and on various other
assumptions that we believe are reasonable under the
circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making
judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities
that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results
may differ from these estimates.
We believe the following represent the most significant and
subjective estimates used in the preparation of our consolidated
financial statements.
Inventory Reserves We maintain reserves for
excess and obsolete inventories to reflect our inventory at the
lower of its stated cost or market value. Our estimate for
excess and obsolete inventory is based upon our assumptions
about future demand and market conditions. If actual conditions
are less favorable than those we have projected, we may need to
increase our reserves for excess and obsolete inventories. Any
increases in our reserves will adversely impact our results of
operations. The establishment of a reserve for excess and
obsolete inventory establishes a new cost basis in the
inventory. Such reserves are not reduced until the product is
sold. If we are able to sell such inventory, any related
reserves would be reversed in the period of sale.
Long-lived Assets We evaluate the
recoverability of our long-lived assets, including plant,
equipment, timberlands and intangible assets periodically or
whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the
carrying amounts may not be recoverable. Our evaluations include
analyses based on the cash flows generated by the underlying
assets, profitability information, including estimated future
operating results, trends or other determinants of fair value.
If the value of an asset determined by these evaluations is less
than its carrying amount, a loss is recognized for the
difference between the fair value and the carrying value of the
asset. Future adverse changes in market conditions or poor
operating results of the related business may indicate an
inability to recover the carrying value of the assets, thereby
possibly requiring an impairment charge in the future.
Pension and Other Post-Retirement
Obligations Accounting for defined-benefit
pension plans, and any curtailments thereof, requires various
assumptions, including, but not limited to, discount rates,
expected long-term rates of return on plan assets and future
compensation growth rates. Accounting for our retiree medical
plans, and any curtailments thereof, also requires various
assumptions, which include, but are not limited to, discount
rates and annual rates of increase in the per capita costs of
health care benefits. We evaluate these assumptions at least
once each year or as facts and circumstances dictate and we make
changes as conditions warrant. Changes to these assumptions will
increase or decrease our reported income, which will result in
changes to the recorded benefit plan assets and liabilities.
Environmental Liabilities We maintain accruals
for losses associated with environmental obligations when it is
probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of
the liability can be reasonably estimated based on existing
legislation and remediation technologies. These accruals are
adjusted periodically as assessment and remediation actions
continue
and/or
further legal or technical information develops. Such
undiscounted liabilities are exclusive of any insurance or other
claims against third parties. Recoveries of environmental
remediation costs from other parties, including insurance
carriers, are recorded as assets when their receipt is assured
beyond a reasonable doubt.
Income Taxes We record the estimated future
tax effects of temporary differences between the tax bases of
assets and liabilities and amounts reported in our balance
sheets, as well as operating loss and tax credit carry forwards.
These deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using
enacted tax rates and laws that will be in effect when such
amounts are expected to reverse or be utilized. We regularly
review our deferred tax assets for recoverability based on
historical taxable income, projected future taxable income, the
expected timing of the reversals of existing temporary
differences and tax planning strategies. If we are unable to
generate sufficient future taxable income, or if there is a
material change in the actual effective tax rates or time period
within which the underlying temporary differences become taxable
or deductible, we could be required to increase the valuation
allowance against our deferred tax assets, which may result in a
substantial increase in our effective tax rate and a material
adverse impact on our reported results.
Significant judgment is required in determining our worldwide
provision for income taxes and recording the related assets and
liabilities. In the ordinary course of our business, there are
many transactions and calculations
-20-
GLATFELTER
Table of Contents
where the ultimate tax determination is less than certain. We
and our subsidiaries are examined by various Federal, State and
foreign tax authorities. We regularly assess the potential
outcomes of these examinations and any future examinations for
the current or prior years in determining the adequacy of our
provision for income taxes. We continually assess the likelihood
and amount of potential adjustments and adjust the income tax
provision, the current liability and deferred taxes in the
period in which the facts that give rise to a revision become
known.
Other significant accounting policies, not involving the same
level of uncertainties as those discussed above, are
nevertheless important to an understanding of the Consolidated
Financial Statements. Refer to Item 8 Financial
Statements and Supplementary Data Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements for additional accounting
policies.
ITEM 7A | QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISKS |
At December 31, |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Year Ended December 31 | 2008 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dollars in thousands | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | Carrying Value | Fair Value | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Long-term debt
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Average principal outstanding
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
At fixed interest rates Bond
|
$ | 200,000 | $ | 200,000 | $ | 200,000 | $ | 200,000 | $ | 200,000 | $ | 200,000 | $ | 167,727 | ||||||||||||||||||
At fixed interest rates Note payable
|
34,000 | 34,000 | 34,000 | 34,000 | 7,825 | 34,000 | 36,164 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
At variable interest rates
|
66,539 | 52,780 | 40,004 | 36,695 | 1,407 | 73,419 | 75,202 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
$ | 307,419 | $ | 279,093 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Weighted-average interest rate
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fixed interest rate debt Bond
|
7.13 | % | 7.13 | % | 7.13 | % | 7.13 | % | 7.13 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Fixed interest rate debt Note payable
|
3.10 | 3.10 | 3.10 | 3.10 | 3.10 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Variable interest rate debt
|
3.06 | 3.25 | 3.46 | 3.52 | 3.52 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The table above presents average principal outstanding and
related interest rates for the next five years. Fair values
included herein have been determined based upon rates currently
available to us for debt with similar terms and remaining
maturities.
Our market risk exposure primarily results from changes in
interest rates and currency exchange rates. At December 31,
2008, we had long-term debt outstanding of $307.4 million,
of which $73.4 million or 24% was at variable interest
rates. Variable-rate debt outstanding represents borrowings
under our revolving credit facility and term loans that incur
interest based on the domestic prime rate or a Eurocurrency
rate, at our option, plus a margin. At December 31, 2008,
the weighted-average interest rate paid was approximately 3.1%.
A hypothetical 100 basis point increase or decrease in the
interest rate on variable rate debt would increase or decrease
annual interest expense by $0.7 million.
We are subject to certain risks associated with changes in
foreign currency exchange rates to the extent our operations are
conducted in currencies other than the U.S. Dollar. During
2008, Euro functional currency operations generated
approximately 20.6% of our sales and 19.9% of operating expenses
and British Pound Sterling operations represented 10.6% of net
sales and 11.2% of operating expenses.
-21-
GLATFELTER
Table of Contents
ITEM 8 | FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA |
MANAGEMENTS
REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
Management of P. H. Glatfelter Company (the Company)
is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate
internal control over financial reporting. The Companys
internal control over financial reporting is a process designed
under the supervision of the chief executive and chief financial
officers to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of the
Companys financial statements for external reporting
purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States.
As of December 31, 2008, management conducted an assessment
of the effectiveness of the Companys internal control over
financial reporting based on the framework established in
Internal Control Integrated Framework issued
by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission (COSO). Management has determined that the
Companys internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2008 is effective to provide reasonable
assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and
the preparation of the Companys financial statements for
external reporting purposes in accordance with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States.
The Companys internal control over financial reporting
includes policies and procedures that pertain to the maintenance
of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly
reflect transactions and dispositions of assets; provide
reasonable assurances that transactions are recorded as
necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in
accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States, and that receipts and expenditures are being made
only in accordance with authorizations of management; and
provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely
detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the
Companys assets that could have a material effect on our
financial statements.
The Companys internal control over financial reporting as
of December 31, 2008, has been audited by
Deloitte & Touche LLP, an independent registered
public accounting firm, as stated in their report appearing
herein, which expresses an unqualified opinion on the
effectiveness of the Companys internal control over
financial reporting as of December 31, 2008.
The Companys management, including the chief executive
officer and chief financial officer, does not expect that our
internal control over financial reporting will prevent or detect
all errors and all frauds. A control system, no matter how well
designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, not
absolute, assurance that the control systems objectives
will be met. The design of a control system must reflect the
fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of
controls must be considered relative to their costs. Further,
because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no
evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that
misstatements due to error or fraud will not occur or that all
control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the
Company have been detected. These inherent limitations include
the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty
and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or
mistake. Controls can also be circumvented by the individual
acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by
management override of the controls. The design of any system of
controls is based, in part, on certain assumptions about the
likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that
any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all
potential future conditions. Projections of any evaluation of
controls effectiveness to future periods are subject to risks.
Over time, controls may become inadequate because of changes in
conditions or deterioration in the degree of compliance with
policies or procedures.
-22-
GLATFELTER
Table of Contents
REPORT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of P. H. Glatfelter
Company
We have audited the internal control over financial reporting of
P.H. Glatfelter Company and subsidiaries (the
Company) as of December 31, 2008, based on
criteria established in Internal Control
Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission. The Companys
management is responsible for maintaining effective internal
control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the
effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting,
included in the accompanying Managements Report on
Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is
to express an opinion on the Companys internal control
over financial reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control
over financial reporting was maintained in all material
respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of
internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk
that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the
design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on
the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we
considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our
audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
A companys internal control over financial reporting is a
process designed by, or under the supervision of, the
companys principal executive and principal financial
officers, or persons performing similar functions, and effected
by the companys board of directors, management, and other
personnel to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles. A companys
internal control over financial reporting includes those
policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance
of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly
reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the
company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions
are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial
statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company
are being made only in accordance with authorizations of
management and directors of the company; and (3) provide
reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of
unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the
companys assets that could have a material effect on the
financial statements.
Because of the inherent limitations of internal control over
financial reporting, including the possibility of collusion or
improper management override of controls, material misstatements
due to error or fraud may not be prevented or detected on a
timely basis. Also, projections of any evaluation of the
effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting
to future periods are subject to the risk that the controls may
become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the
degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may
deteriorate.
In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material
respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as
of December 31, 2008, based on the criteria established in
Internal Control Integrated Framework issued
by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the
consolidated financial statements and financial statement
schedule as of and for the year ended December 31, 2008 of
the Company and our report dated March 11, 2009 expressed
an unqualified opinion on those financial statements and
financial statement schedule.
DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
March 11, 2009
-23-
GLATFELTER
Table of Contents
REPORT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of P.H. Glatfelter
Company
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of
P.H. Glatfelter Company and subsidiaries (the
Company) as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, and
the related consolidated statements of income,
shareholders equity, and cash flows for each of the three
years in the period ended December 31, 2008. Our audits
also included the financial statement schedule listed in the
Index at Item 15. These financial statements and financial
statement schedule are the responsibility of the Companys
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the
financial statements and financial statement schedule based on
our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present
fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of P.H.
Glatfelter Company and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2008
and 2007, and the results of their operations and their cash
flows for each of the three years in the period ended
December 31, 2008, in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America. Also, in our
opinion, the financial statement schedule, when considered in
relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as
a whole, presents fairly, in all material respects, the
information set forth therein.
As discussed in Note 11 to the consolidated financial
statements, the Company adopted Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 158, Employers
Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement
Plans an amendment of FASB Statements No. 87,
88, 106, and 132(R), as of December 31, 2006.
As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial
statements, the Company adopted Financial Accounting Standards
Board Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for
Uncertainty in Income Taxes an interpretation of
FASB No. 109 as of January 1, 2007.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the
Companys internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2008, based on the criteria established in
Internal Control Integrated Framework issued
by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission and our report dated March 11, 2009, expressed
an unqualified opinion on the Companys internal control
over financial reporting.
DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
March 11, 2009
-24-
GLATFELTER
Table of Contents
P. H. GLATFELTER
COMPANY and SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
Year Ended December 31 | ||||||||||||||||
In thousands, except per share | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | |||||||||||||
Net sales
|
$ | 1,263,850 | $ | 1,148,323 | $ | 986,411 | ||||||||||
Energy sales net
|
9,364 | 9,445 | 10,726 | |||||||||||||
Total revenues
|
1,273,214 | 1,157,768 | 997,137 | |||||||||||||
Costs of products sold
|
1,095,432 | 1,001,456 | 891,843 | |||||||||||||
Gross profit
|
177,782 | 156,312 | 105,294 | |||||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
97,897 | 116,144 | 92,481 | |||||||||||||
(Reversals of) Shutdown and restructuring charges
|
(856 | ) | 35 | 30,318 | ||||||||||||
Gains on disposition of plant, equipment and timberlands, net
|
(18,468 | ) | (78,685 | ) | (17,394 | ) | ||||||||||
Insurance recoveries
|
| | (205 | ) | ||||||||||||
Operating income
|
99,209 | 118,818 | 94 | |||||||||||||
Other nonoperating income (expense)
|
||||||||||||||||
Interest expense
|
(23,160 | ) | (29,022 | ) | (24,453 | ) | ||||||||||
Interest income
|
4,975 | 3,933 | 3,132 | |||||||||||||
Other net
|
2 | 205 | (1,001 | ) | ||||||||||||
Total other nonoperating expense
|
(18,183 | ) | (24,884 | ) | (22,322 | ) | ||||||||||
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
81,026 | 93,934 | (22,228 | ) | ||||||||||||
Income tax provision (benefit)
|
23,138 | 30,462 | (9,992 | ) | ||||||||||||
Net income (loss)
|
$ | 57,888 | $ | 63,472 | $ | (12,236 | ) | |||||||||
Weighted average shares outstanding
|
||||||||||||||||
Basic
|
45,247 | 45,035 | 44,584 | |||||||||||||
Diluted
|
45,572 | 45,422 | 44,584 | |||||||||||||
Earnings (loss) per share
|
||||||||||||||||
Basic
|
$ | 1.28 | $ | 1.41 | $ | (0.27 | ) | |||||||||
Diluted
|
1.27 | 1.40 | (0.27 | ) | ||||||||||||
The accompanying notes are an
integral part of the consolidated financial
statements.
-25-
GLATFELTER
Table of Contents
P. H. GLATFELTER
COMPANY and SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
December 31 | ||||||||||||
Dollars in thousands, except par values | 2008 | 2007 | ||||||||||
Assets
|
||||||||||||
Current assets
|
||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents
|
$ | 32,234 | $ | 29,833 | ||||||||
Accounts receivable (less allowance for doubtful accounts:
2008 $2,633; 2007 $3,117)
|
132,635 | 122,980 | ||||||||||
Inventories
|
193,354 | 193,042 | ||||||||||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
33,596 | 27,557 | ||||||||||
Total current assets
|
391,819 | 373,412 | ||||||||||
Plant, equipment and timberlands net
|
493,564 | 519,866 | ||||||||||
Other long-term assets
|
171,926 | 393,789 | ||||||||||
Total assets
|
$ | 1,057,309 | $ | 1,287,067 | ||||||||
Liabilities and Shareholders Equity
|
||||||||||||
Current liabilities
|
||||||||||||
Current portion of long-term debt
|
$ | 13,759 | $ | 11,008 | ||||||||
Short-term debt
|
5,866 | 1,136 | ||||||||||
Accounts payable
|
59,750 | 73,195 | ||||||||||
Dividends payable
|
4,089 | 4,063 | ||||||||||
Environmental liabilities
|
5,734 | 7,038 | ||||||||||
Other current liabilities
|
100,904 | 101,116 | ||||||||||
Total current liabilities
|
190,102 | 197,556 | ||||||||||
Long-term debt
|
293,660 | 301,041 | ||||||||||
Deferred income taxes
|
90,158 | 189,156 | ||||||||||
Other long-term liabilities
|
140,682 | 123,246 | ||||||||||
Total liabilities
|
714,602 | 810,999 | ||||||||||
Commitments and contingencies
|
| | ||||||||||
Shareholders equity
|
||||||||||||
Common stock, $.01 par value; authorized
120,000,000 shares; issued
54,361,980 shares (including shares in treasury:
2008 8,928,004; 2007 9,219,476)
|
544 | 544 | ||||||||||
Capital in excess of par value
|
45,806 | 44,697 | ||||||||||
Retained earnings
|
605,001 | 563,608 | ||||||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
|
(176,133 | ) | 4,061 | |||||||||
475,218 | 612,910 | |||||||||||
Less cost of common stock in treasury
|
(132,511 | ) | (136,842 | ) | ||||||||
Total shareholders equity
|
342,707 | 476,068 | ||||||||||
Total liabilities and shareholders equity
|
$ | 1,057,309 | $ | 1,287,067 | ||||||||
The accompanying notes are an
integral part of the consolidated financial
statements.
-26-
GLATFELTER
Table of Contents
P.H. GLATFELTER
COMPANY and SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Year Ended December 31 | ||||||||||||||||
In thousands | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | |||||||||||||
Operating activities
|
||||||||||||||||
Net income (loss)
|
$ | 57,888 | $ | 63,472 | $ | (12,236 | ) | |||||||||
Adjustments to reconcile to net cash (used) provided by
operations:
|
||||||||||||||||
Depreciation, depletion and amortization
|
60,611 | 56,001 | 50,021 | |||||||||||||
(Cash used) reserve for environmental matters
|
(13,012 | ) | 26,000 | | ||||||||||||
Pension income
|
(16,062 | ) | (12,896 | ) | (16,993 | ) | ||||||||||
(Reversals of) shutdown and restructuring charges
|
(856 | ) | 35 | 37,066 | ||||||||||||
Deferred income taxes
|
3,265 | 8,004 | (12,726 | ) | ||||||||||||
Gains on dispositions of plant, equipment and timberlands, net
|
(18,468 | ) | (78,685 | ) | (17,394 | ) | ||||||||||
Share-based compensation
|
4,350 | 3,850 | 2,335 | |||||||||||||
Change in operating assets and liabilities
|
||||||||||||||||
Accounts receivable
|
(17,668 | ) | 16,662 | (17,622 | ) | |||||||||||
Inventories
|
(9,975 | ) | 8,493 | (8,869 | ) | |||||||||||
Prepaid and other assets
|
871 | (2,461 | ) | 4,413 | ||||||||||||
Liabilities
|
2,481 | 11,857 | (36,422 | ) | ||||||||||||
Net cash provided (used) by operations
|
53,425 | 100,332 | (28,427 | ) | ||||||||||||
Investing activities
|
||||||||||||||||
Expenditures for purchases of plant, equipment and timberlands
|
(52,469 | ) | (28,960 | ) | (44,460 | ) | ||||||||||
Proceeds from disposal of plant, equipment and timberlands
|
19,279 | 41,616 | 21,071 | |||||||||||||
Acquisitions, net of cash acquired
|
| (7,923 | ) | (158,442 | ) | |||||||||||
Net cash (used) provided by investing activities
|
(33,190 | ) | 4,733 | (181,831 | ) | |||||||||||
Financing activities
|
||||||||||||||||
Net (repayments of) proceeds from revolving credit facility
|
(24,197 | ) | (30,656 | ) | 43,522 | |||||||||||
Net (repayments of) proceeds from other short-term debt
|
2,927 | (6,916 | ) | (995 | ) | |||||||||||
Net (repayments of) proceeds from $100 million term loan
facility
|
(13,000 | ) | (53,000 | ) | 94,829 | |||||||||||
Net proceeds from $200 million
71/8% note
offering
|
| | 196,440 | |||||||||||||
Repayment of $150 million
67/8
notes
|
| | (152,675 | ) | ||||||||||||
Proceeds from borrowing under Term Loan due 2013
|
36,695 | | | |||||||||||||
Payment of dividends
|
(16,469 | ) | (16,350 | ) | (16,023 | ) | ||||||||||
Proceeds and excess tax benefits from stock options exercised
and other
|
1,165 | 7,551 | 8,290 | |||||||||||||
Net cash (used) provided by financing activities
|
(12,879 | ) | (99,371 | ) | 173,388 | |||||||||||
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash
|
(4,955 | ) | 2,154 | 1,413 | ||||||||||||
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
2,401 | 7,848 | (35,457 | ) | ||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of period
|
29,833 | 21,985 | 57,442 | |||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at the end of period
|
$ | 32,234 | $ | 29,833 | $ | 21,985 | ||||||||||
Supplemental cash flow information
|
||||||||||||||||
Cash paid for
|
||||||||||||||||
Interest
|
$ | 21,243 | $ | 28,498 | $ | 26,218 | ||||||||||
Income taxes
|
20,011 | 2,614 | 17,579 | |||||||||||||
The accompanying notes are an
integral part of the consolidated financial
statements.
-27-
GLATFELTER
Table of Contents
P. H. GLATFELTER
COMPANY and SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
For the Years Ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
For the Years Ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006
Accumulated |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Capital in |
Other |
Total |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Common |
Excess of |
Retained |
Deferred |
Comprehensive |
Treasury |
Shareholders |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
In thousands, except shares outstanding | Stock | Par Value | Earnings | Compensation | Income (Loss) | Stock | Equity | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at January 1, 2006
|
$ | 544 | $ | 43,450 | $ | 547,810 | $ | (2,295 | ) | $ | (5,343 | ) | $ | (151,854 | ) | $ | 432,312 | |||||||||||||
Net loss
|
(12,236 | ) | (12,236 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency translation adjustments
|
12,343 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adjustment to minimum pension liability prior to adoption of
SFAS No. 158
|
583 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other comprehensive income
|
12,926 | 12,926 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive income
|
690 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reversal of minimum pension liability under
SFAS No. 158
|
3,909 | 3,909 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Additional net pension liability, net of tax benefit of $27,318
|
(43,829 | ) | (43,829 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adoption of SFAS No. 123(R)
|
(2,295 | ) | 2,295 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tax effect on employee stock options exercised
|
792 | 792 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash dividends declared ($0.36 per share)
|
(16,085 | ) | (16,085 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Share-based compensation expense RSU
|
1,107 | 1,107 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Delivery of treasury shares
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Performance Shares
|
7 | 200 | 207 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
401(k) plans
|
46 | 1,608 | 1,654 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Director compensation
|
8 | 105 | 113 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Employee stock options exercised net
|
(827 | ) | 8,325 | 7,498 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2006
|
544 | 42,288 | 519,489 | | (32,337 | ) | (141,616 | ) | 388,368 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive income
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income
|
63,472 | 63,472 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency translation adjustments
|
24,966 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Change in benefit plans net funded status, net of tax
benefit of $7,167
|
11,432 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other comprehensive income
|
36,398 | 36,398 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive income
|
99,870 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cumulative effect of adopting of FIN 48
|
(2,974 | ) | (2,974 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tax effect on employee stock options exercised
|
89 | 89 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash dividends declared ($0.36 per share)
|
(16,379 | ) | (16,379 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Share-based compensation expense
|
2,348 | 2,348 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Delivery of treasury shares
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
401(k) plans
|
85 | 3,049 | 3,134 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Director compensation
|
1 | 162 | 163 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Employee stock options exercised net
|
(114 | ) | 1,563 | 1,449 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2007
|
544 | 44,697 | 563,608 | | 4,061 | (136,842 | ) | 476,068 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive income
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income
|
57,888 | 57,888 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency translation adjustments
|
(32,029 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Change in benefit plans net funded status, net of tax
benefit of $92,570
|
(148,165 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other comprehensive income
|
(180,194 | ) | (180,194 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive income
|
(122,306 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tax effect on employee stock options exercised
|
38 | 38 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash dividends declared ($0.36 per share)
|
(16,495 | ) | (16,495 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Share-based compensation expense
|
3,244 | 3,244 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Delivery of treasury shares
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
RSUs
|
(1,739 | ) | 1,400 | (339 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
401(k) plans
|
(248 | ) | 1,768 | 1,520 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Director compensation
|
(43 | ) | 206 | 163 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Employee stock options exercised net
|
(143 | ) | 957 | 814 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2008
|
$ | 544 | $ | 45,806 | $ | 605,001 | $ | | $ | (176,133 | ) | $ | (132,511 | ) | $ | 342,707 | ||||||||||||||
The accompanying notes are an
integral part of the consolidated financial
statements.
-28-
GLATFELTER
Table of Contents
P. H. GLATFELTER
COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. | ORGANIZATION |
P. H. Glatfelter Company and subsidiaries
(Glatfelter) is a manufacturer of specialty papers
and engineered products. Headquartered in York, Pennsylvania,
our manufacturing facilities are located in Spring Grove,
Pennsylvania; Chillicothe and Freemont, Ohio; Gloucestershire
(Lydney), England; Caerphilly, Wales, Gernsbach, Germany;
Scaër, France; and the Philippines. Our products are
marketed throughout the United States and in over 85 other
countries, either through wholesale paper merchants, brokers and
agents or directly to customers.
2. | ACCOUNTING POLICIES |
Principles of Consolidation The consolidated
financial statements include the accounts of Glatfelter and its
wholly owned subsidiaries. All intercompany balances and
transactions have been eliminated.
Accounting Estimates The preparation of
financial statements in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America requires
management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the
reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosures of
contingencies as of the balance sheet date and the reported
amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period.
Management believes the estimates and assumptions used in the
preparation of these consolidated financial statements are
reasonable, based upon currently available facts and known
circumstances, but recognizes that actual results may differ
from those estimates and assumptions.
Cash and Cash Equivalents We classify all
highly liquid instruments with an original maturity of three
months or less at the time of purchase as cash equivalents.
Inventories Inventories are stated at the
lower of cost or market. Raw materials, in-process and finished
inventories of our domestic manufacturing operations are valued
using the
last-in,
first-out (LIFO) method, and the supplies inventories are valued
principally using the average-cost method. Inventories at our
foreign operations are valued using a method that approximates
average cost.
Plant, Equipment and Timberlands For financial
reporting purposes, depreciation is computed using the
straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the
respective assets.
The range of estimated service lives used to calculate financial
reporting depreciation for principal items of plant and
equipment are as follows:
Buildings
|
10 45 Years | |||
Machinery and equipment
|
7 35 Years | |||
Other
|
4 40 Years |
Maintenance and Repairs Maintenance and
repairs costs are charged to income and major renewals and
betterments are capitalized. At the time property is retired or
sold, the net carrying value is eliminated and any resultant
gain or loss is included in income.
Valuation of Long-lived Assets, Intangible Assets and
Goodwill We evaluate long-lived assets for
impairment when a specific event indicates that the carrying
value of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability is
assessed based on estimates of future cash flows expected to
result from the use and eventual disposition of the asset. If
the sum of expected undiscounted cash flows is less than the
carrying value of the asset, the assets fair value is
estimated and an impairment loss is recognized for any
deficiencies. Goodwill is reviewed for impairment on a
discounted cash flow basis at least annually. Impairment losses,
if any, are recognized for the amount by which the carrying
value of the asset exceeds its fair value.
Asset Retirement Obligations In accordance
with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
(SFAS) No. 143, Accounting for Asset
Retirement Obligations, as interpreted by Financial
Accounting Standards Board Interpretation No. 47,
Accounting for Conditional Asset Retirement Obligations,
an interpretation of SFAS No. 143
(FIN 47), we accrue asset retirement
obligations, if any, in the period in which obligations relating
to future asset retirements are incurred and when a reasonable
estimate of fair value can be determined. Under these standards,
costs are to be accrued at estimated fair value, and a related
long-lived asset is capitalized. Over time, the liability is
accreted to its settlement value and the capitalized cost is
depreciated over the useful life of the related asset for which
the obligation exists. Upon settlement of the liability, we
recognize a gain or loss for any difference between the
settlement amount and the liability recorded.
Income Taxes Income taxes are determined using
the asset and liability method of accounting for income taxes in
accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes
(SFAS No. 109). Under
SFAS No. 109, tax expense includes U.S. and
international income taxes plus the provision for U.S. taxes on
undistributed earnings of
-29-
GLATFELTER
Table of Contents
international subsidiaries not deemed to be permanently
invested. Tax credits and other incentives reduce tax expense in
the year the credits are claimed. Certain items of income and
expense are not reported in tax returns and financial statements
in the same year. The tax effect of such temporary differences
is reported in deferred income taxes. Deferred tax assets are
recognized if it is more likely than not that the assets will be
realized in future years. We establish a valuation allowance for
deferred tax assets for which realization is not more likely
than not.
Effective January 1, 2007, income tax contingencies are
accounted for in accordance with FASB Interpretation
No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income
Taxes an interpretation of FASB Statement
No. 109 (FIN 48). Significant
judgment is required in determining our worldwide provision for
income taxes and recording the related assets and liabilities.
In the ordinary course of our business, there are many
transactions and calculations where the ultimate tax
determination is less than certain. We and our subsidiaries are
examined by various Federal, State and foreign tax authorities.
We regularly assess the potential outcomes of these examinations
and any future examinations for the current or prior years in
determining the adequacy of our provision for income taxes. We
continually assess the likelihood and amount of potential
adjustments and record any necessary adjustments in the period
in which the facts that give rise to a revision become known.
Treasury Stock Common stock purchased for
treasury is recorded at cost. At the date of subsequent reissue,
the treasury stock account is reduced by the cost of such stock
on the weighted-average cost basis.
Foreign Currency Translation Our subsidiaries
outside the United States use their local currency as the
functional currency. Accordingly, translation gains and losses
and the effect of exchange rate changes on transactions
designated as hedges of net foreign investments are included as
a component of other comprehensive income (loss). Transaction
gains and losses are included in income in the period in which
they occur.
Revenue Recognition We recognize revenue on
product sales when the customer takes title and assumes the
risks and rewards of ownership. We record revenue net of an
allowance for customer returns and rebates.
Revenue from energy sales is recognized when electricity is
delivered to the customer. Certain costs associated with the
production of electricity, such as fuel, labor, depreciation and
maintenance are netted against energy sales for presentation on
the Consolidated Statements of Income. Costs netted against
energy sales totaled $10.4 million, $10.2 million,
$8.4 million for the years ended December 31, 2008,
2007 and 2006, respectively. Our current contract to sell
electricity generated in excess of our own use expires in the
year 2010 and requires that the customer purchase all of our
excess electricity up to a certain level. The price for the
electricity is determined pursuant to a formula and varies
depending upon the amount sold in any given year.
Environmental Liabilities Accruals for losses
associated with environmental obligations are recorded when it
is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of
the liability can be reasonably estimated based on existing
legislation and remediation technologies. Costs related to
environmental remediation are charged to expense. These accruals
are adjusted periodically as assessment and remediation actions
continue
and/or
further legal or technical information develops. Such
undiscounted liabilities are exclusive of any insurance or other
claims against third parties. Environmental costs are
capitalized if the costs extend the life of the asset, increase
its capacity
and/or
mitigate or prevent contamination from future operations.
Recoveries of environmental remediation costs from other
parties, including insurance carriers, are recorded as assets
when their receipt is assured beyond a reasonable doubt.
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income The
amounts reported on the consolidated Statement of
Shareholders Equity for Accumulated Other Comprehensive
Income at December 31, 2008 consist of $180.6 million
of additional defined benefit liabilities, net of tax, and
$4.5 million of gains from foreign currency translation
adjustments.
Earnings Per Share Basic earnings per share
are computed by dividing net income by the weighted-average
common shares outstanding during the respective periods. Diluted
earnings per share are computed by dividing net income by the
weighted-average common shares and common share equivalents
outstanding during the period. The dilutive effect of common
share equivalents is considered in the diluted earnings per
share computation using the treasury stock method.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments The
amounts reported on the Consolidated Balance Sheets for cash and
cash equivalents, accounts receivable, other assets, and
short-term debt approximate fair value. The following table sets
forth carrying value and fair value of long-term debt:
2008 | 2007 | ||||||||||||||||||
Carrying |
Fair |
Carrying |
Fair |
||||||||||||||||
In thousands | Value | Value | Value | Value | |||||||||||||||
Long-term debt
|
$ | 307,419 | $ | 279,093 | $ | 312,049 | $ | 301,300 | |||||||||||
-30-
GLATFELTER
Table of Contents
3. | RECENT PRONOUNCEMENTS |
In September 2006, SFAS No. 157, Fair Value
Measurements, was issued. SFAS No. 157,
which defines fair value, establishes a framework for
measurement and requires expanded disclosures about the fair
value measurements, was effective for us beginning
January 1, 2008. The adoption of SFAS No. 157 did
not have a material impact on our consolidated financial
position or results of operations.
In December 2007, SFAS No. 141(R), Business
Combinations was issued. This statement establishes
principles and requirements for how the acquirer of a business
recognizes and measures in its financial statements the
identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, and any
noncontrolling interest in the acquiree.
SFAS No. 141(R) also provides guidance for recognizing
and measuring the goodwill acquired in the business combination
and determines what information to disclose to enable users of
the financial statements to evaluate the nature and financial
effects of the business combination. It also changes the
recognition of assets acquired and liabilities assumed arising
from contingencies, requires the capitalization of in-process
research and development at fair value, and requires the
expensing of acquisition-related costs as incurred. In addition,
under SFAS No. 141(R), changes in an acquired
entitys deferred tax assets and uncertain tax positions
after the measurement period will impact income tax expense.
With respect to us, SFAS No. 141(R) applies
prospectively to business combinations for which the acquisition
date is on or after January 1, 2009. However, after
adoption of SFAS No. 141(R), changes in estimates of
deferred tax assets and liabilities, and final settlements of
all income tax uncertainties that related to a business
combination which are made after the measurement period will
impact income tax expense. We expect SFAS No. 141(R)
will have an impact on accounting for business combinations once
adopted but the effect is dependent upon acquisitions at that
time.
On December 30, 2008, the FASB issued FSP FAS 132(R)-1
Employers Disclosures about Postretirement
Benefit Plan Assets (FSP
FAS 132(R)-1). This standard, which will be effective
for us beginning December 31, 2009, will require more
detailed disclosures about pension plan assets, our investment
strategies, major categories of plan assets, concentrations of
risk within the plan, and valuation techniques used to measure
fair value. The adoption of FSP FAS 132(R) is not expected
to have a material impact on our consolidated financial position
or results of operation.
4. | ACQUISITIONS |
Metallised Products Limited On
November 30, 2007, through Glatfelter-UK Limited
(GLT-UK), a wholly-owned subsidiary, we completed
our acquisition of Metallised Products Limited
(MPL), a privately owned company that manufactures a
variety of metallized paper products for consumer and industrial
applications. MPL is based in Caerphilly, Wales.
Under terms of the agreement, we agreed to purchase the stock of
MPL for $7.2 million cash and assumed $5.8 million of
debt in addition to $1.4 million of transaction costs. The
acquisition was financed from our existing cash balance. This
facility employed about 165 people at the time of the
acquisition and had 2007 revenues of approximately
$53.4 million.
The following table summarizes the allocation of the purchase
price to assets acquired and liabilities assumed:
In thousands | ||||||||
Assets
|
||||||||
Cash
|
$ | 730 | ||||||
Accounts receivable
|
7,718 | |||||||
Inventory
|
4,731 | |||||||
Property and equipment
|
9,663 | |||||||
Other assets
|
903 | |||||||
Goodwill
|
2,239 | |||||||
Total
|
25,984 | |||||||
Liabilities
|
||||||||
Acquisition related liabilities including accounts payable and
accrued expenses
|
11,783 | |||||||
Long term debt
|
5,830 | |||||||
Total
|
17,613 | |||||||
Total purchase price
|
$ | 8,371 | ||||||
5. | NEENAH FACILITY SHUTDOWN |
In 2006, we committed to a plan to permanently close the Neenah,
WI facility. Production at this facility ceased effective
June 30, 2006 and certain products previously manufactured
at the Neenah facility have been transferred to Chillicothe.
The remaining reserve as of December 31, 2006 associated
with this restructuring initiative totaled $2.8 million.
During 2007, we made payments totaling $1.7 million; thus,
the remaining reserve balance was $1.1 million at
December 31, 2007. In 2008, we reversed $0.9 million
into income upon the sale of the property and the remaining
balance at December 31, 2008 totaled $0.2 million.
-31-
GLATFELTER
Table of Contents
The following table summarizes shutdown reserve activity during
the year ended December 31, 2006:
Less non- |
||||||||||||||||||
cash |
||||||||||||||||||
charges |
||||||||||||||||||
Beg. |
Amount |
and cash |
||||||||||||||||
In thousands | balance | Accrued | payments | Balance | ||||||||||||||
Non-cash charges
|
||||||||||||||||||
Accelerated depreciation
|
$ | | $ | 22,466 | $ | (22,466 | ) | $ | ||||||||||
Inventory write-down
|
| 2,905 | (2,905 | ) | | |||||||||||||
Pension curtailments and other retirement benefit charges
|
| 7,675 | (7,675 | ) | | |||||||||||||
Total non cash charges
|
| 33,046 | (33,046 | ) | | |||||||||||||
Cash charges
|
||||||||||||||||||
Severance and benefit continuation
|
| 7,653 | (6,026 | ) | 1,627 | |||||||||||||
Contract termination costs
|
| 11,367 | (11,367 | ) | | |||||||||||||
Other
|
| 2,379 | (1,229 | ) | 1,150 | |||||||||||||
Total cash charges
|
| 21,399 | (18,622 | ) | 2,777 | |||||||||||||
Total
|
$ | | $ | 54,445 | $ | (51,668 | ) | $2,777 | ||||||||||
The Neenah shutdown resulted in the elimination of approximately
200 positions that had been supporting our Specialty Papers
business unit. Approximately $25.4 million of the Neenah
shutdown related charges are recorded as part of costs of
products sold in the accompanying statements of income. The
amounts accrued for severance and benefit continuation are
recorded as other current liabilities in the accompanying
consolidated balance sheets. As part of the Neenah shutdown, we
terminated our long-term steam supply contract, as provided for
within the contract, resulting in a termination fee of
approximately $11.4 million as of the end of the second
quarter 2006.
6. | RESTRUCTURING CHARGES |
European Restructuring and Optimization Program (EURO
Program) During the fourth quarter of 2005,
we began to implement this restructuring program, a
comprehensive series of initiatives designed to improve the
performance of our Composite Fibers business unit. In 2006, we
recorded restructuring charges of $1.2 million associated
with the related work force efficiency plans at the Gernsbach,
Germany facility. This charge reflects severance, early
retirement and related costs for the affected employees.
7. | GAIN ON DISPOSITIONS OF PLANT, EQUIPMENT AND TIMBERLANDS |
During 2008, 2007 and 2006, we completed sales of timberlands.
The following table summarizes these transactions:
Dollars in thousands | Acres | Proceeds | Gain | |||||||||||
2008
|
||||||||||||||
Timberlands
|
4,561 | $ | 19,279 | $ | 18,649 | |||||||||
Other
|
n/a | | (181 | ) | ||||||||||
Total
|
$ | 19,279 | $ | 18,468 | ||||||||||
2007
|
||||||||||||||
Timberlands
|
37,448 | $ | 84,409 | $ | 78,958 | |||||||||
Other
|
n/a | 377 | (273 | ) | ||||||||||
Total
|
$ | 84,786 | $ | 78,685 | ||||||||||
2006
|
||||||||||||||
Timberlands
|
5,923 | $ | 17,130 | $ | 15,677 | |||||||||
Other
|
n/a | 3,941 | 1,717 | |||||||||||
Total
|
$ | 21,071 | $ | 17,394 | ||||||||||
The amounts set forth above for 2008 include a $2.9 million
gain from the sale of 246 acres of timberlands for cash
consideration to George H. Glatfelter II, our chairman and chief
executive officer, and his spouse. The 246 acres of
timberlands had been independently appraised and marketed for
public sale by the Company. Based on those appraisals and the
marketing process that was pursued, the Company and its Board
believed that the sale price agreed to with the Glatfelters
constituted fair market value for the timberland. In accordance
with terms of our credit facility, we are required to use the
proceeds from timberland sales to reduce amounts outstanding
under our term loan.
In connection with the asset sales set forth above we received
cash proceeds with the exception of the sale of approximately
26,000 acres of timberland completed in November 2007. As
consideration for the timberland sold in this transaction we
received a $43.2 million,
20-year
interest-bearing note due from the buyer, Glawson Investments
Corp. (Glawson), a Georgia corporation, and GIC
Investments LLC, a Delaware limited liability company owned by
Glawson. The note receivable is fully secured by a letter of
credit issued by The Royal Bank of Scotland plc.
8. | EARNINGS PER SHARE |
The following table sets forth the details of basic and diluted
earnings per share (EPS):
In thousands, except per share | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | ||||||||||||
Net income (loss)
|
$57,888 | $63,472 | $(12,236 | ) | |||||||||||
Weighted average common shares outstanding used in basic EPS
|
45,247 | 45,035 | 44,584 | ||||||||||||
Common shares issuable upon exercise of dilutive stock options,
restricted stock awards and performance awards
|
325 | 387 | | ||||||||||||
Weighted average common shares outstanding and common share
equivalents used in diluted EPS
|
45,572 | 45,422 | 44,584 | ||||||||||||
Basic EPS
|
$1.28 | $1.41 | $(0.27 | ) | |||||||||||
Diluted EPS
|
1.27 | 1.40 | (0.27 | ) | |||||||||||
-32-
GLATFELTER
Table of Contents
The following table sets forth the potential common shares
outstanding for stock options and restricted stock units that
were not included in the computation of diluted EPS for the
period indicated, because their effect would be anti-dilutive:
In thousands | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | ||||||||||||
Potential common shares
|
1,132 | 438 | 1,280 | ||||||||||||
9. | INCOME TAXES |
Income taxes are recognized for the amount of taxes payable or
refundable for the current year and deferred tax liabilities and
assets for the future tax consequences of events that have been
recognized in our consolidated financial statements or tax
returns. The effects of income taxes are measured based on
enacted tax laws and rates.
The provision for income taxes from operations consisted of the
following:
Year Ended December 31 | |||||||||||||||
In thousands | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | ||||||||||||
Current taxes
|
|||||||||||||||
Federal
|
$5,647 | $8,388 | $1,009 | ||||||||||||
State
|
2,609 | 4,422 | 1,013 | ||||||||||||
Foreign
|
11,617 | 6,397 | 712 | ||||||||||||
19,873 | 19,207 | 2,734 | |||||||||||||
Deferred taxes and other
|
|||||||||||||||
Federal
|
9,026 | 11,766 | (11,903 | ) | |||||||||||
State
|
86 | 2,674 | (2,970 | ) | |||||||||||
Foreign
|
(5,847 | ) | (3,185 | ) | 2,147 | ||||||||||
3,265 | 11,255 | (12,726 | ) | ||||||||||||
Income tax provision (benefit)
|
$23,138 | $30,462 | $(9,992 | ) | |||||||||||
The amounts set forth above for total deferred taxes and other
include deferred taxes of $3.0 million, $8.0 million
and $(12.7) million at December 31, 2008, 2007 and
2006, respectively. Other taxes totaled $0.2 million at
December 31, 2008 and $3.3 million at
December 31, 2007 and related to uncertain tax positions
expected to be taken in future tax filings.
The following are the domestic and foreign components of pretax
income from operations:
Year Ended December 31 | |||||||||||||||
In thousands | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | ||||||||||||
United States
|
$61,387 | $70,051 | $(30,010 | ) | |||||||||||
Foreign
|
19,639 | 23,883 | 7,782 | ||||||||||||
Total pretax income (loss)
|
$81,026 | $93,934 | $(22,228 | ) | |||||||||||
A reconciliation between the income tax provision, computed by
applying the statutory federal income tax rate of 35% to income
before income taxes, and the actual income tax is as follows:
Year Ended December 31 | |||||||||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | 2006 | |||||||||||||||
Federal income tax provision at statutory rate
|
35.0 | % | 35.0 | % | (35.0 | )% | |||||||||||
State income taxes, net of federal income tax benefit
|
3.1 | 3.5 | (6.7 | ) | |||||||||||||
Foreign income tax rate differential
|
(2.5 | ) | 0.2 | 3.8 | |||||||||||||
Change in statutory tax rates
|
| (5.8 | ) | | |||||||||||||
Tax credits
|
(5.7 | ) | (2.8 | ) | (8.1 | ) | |||||||||||
Change in unrecognized tax benefits, net
|
2.5 | 4.0 | 3.8 | ||||||||||||||
Charitable contribution valuation allowance release
|
(1.8 | ) | | | |||||||||||||
Other
|
(2.0 | ) | (1.7 | ) | (2.8 | ) | |||||||||||
Total provision for income taxes
|
28.6 | % | 32.4 | % | (45.0 | )% | |||||||||||
The sources of deferred income taxes were as follows at December
31:
2008 | 2007 | ||||||||||||||||||
Non |
Non- |
||||||||||||||||||
Current |
current |
Current |
current |
||||||||||||||||
Asset |
Asset |
Asset |
Asset |
||||||||||||||||
In thousands | (Liability) | (Liability) | (Liability) | (Liability) | |||||||||||||||
Reserves
|
$ | 8,983 | $ | 11,086 | $ | 10,301 | $ | 10,008 | |||||||||||
Compensation
|
3,292 | 3,368 | 3,369 | 2,819 | |||||||||||||||
Post-retirement benefits
|
1,619 | 18,748 | 1,409 | 16,104 | |||||||||||||||
Property
|
13 | (107,921 | ) | 104 | (109,858 | ) | |||||||||||||
Pension
|
781 | (13,507 | ) | 833 | (98,445 | ) | |||||||||||||
Installment sales
|
| (25,148 | ) | | (25,492 | ) | |||||||||||||
Inventories
|
(803 | ) | | 366 | | ||||||||||||||
Other
|
475 | 6,909 | 501 | (1,454 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Tax carryforwards
|
| 28,006 | | 29,458 | |||||||||||||||
Subtotal
|
14,360 | (78,459 | ) | 16,883 | (176,860 | ) | |||||||||||||
Valuation allowance
|
(2,547 | ) | (10,215 | ) | (3,280 | ) | (12,296 | ) | |||||||||||
Total
|
$ | 11,813 | $ | (88,674 | ) | $ | 13,603 | $ | (189,156 | ) | |||||||||
Current and non-current deferred tax assets and liabilities are
included in the following balance sheet captions:
December 31 | |||||||||||||
In thousands | 2008 | 2007 | |||||||||||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
$ | 14,421 | $ | 16,982 | |||||||||
Other long term assets
|
1,484 | | |||||||||||
Other current liabilities
|
2,608 | 3,379 | |||||||||||
Deferred income taxes
|
90,158 | 189,156 | |||||||||||
At December 31, 2008, we had state and foreign tax net
operating loss (NOL) carryforwards of
$96.0 million and $31.0 million, respectively. These
NOL carryforwards are available to offset future taxable income,
if any. The state NOL carryforwards expire between 2015 and
2027; the foreign NOL carryforwards do not expire.
In addition, we had federal foreign tax credit carryforwards of
$0.3 million, which expire in 2013, and various state tax
credit carryforwards totaling $0.1 million, which expire
between 2014 and 2027.
We have established a valuation allowance of $12.8 million
against the net deferred tax assets, primarily due to the
uncertainty regarding the ability to utilize state tax credit
carryforwards and certain deferred foreign tax credits.
Tax credits and other incentives reduce tax expense in the year
the credits are claimed. In 2008, we recorded
-33-
GLATFELTER
Table of Contents
tax credits of $4.7 million related to research and
development credits, fuels tax, and the electricity production
tax credits. In 2007 and 2006 similar tax credits of
$2.6 million and $1.8 million, respectively, were
recorded.
At December 31, 2008 and 2007, unremitted earnings of
subsidiaries outside the United States deemed to be permanently
reinvested totaled $107.4 million and $92.5 million,
respectively. Because the unremitted earnings of subsidiaries
are deemed to be permanently reinvested as of December 31,
2008, no deferred tax liability has been recognized in our
consolidated financial statements.
As of December 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, we had
$29.2 million and $26.1 million of gross unrecognized
tax benefits respectively. As of December 31, 2008, if such
benefits were to be recognized, approximately $25.3 million
would be recorded as a component of income tax expense, thereby
affecting our effective tax rate.
A reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances of the
total amounts of gross unrecognized tax benefits is as follows:
In millions | 2008 | 2007 | ||||||||||
Balance at January 1
|
$ | 26.1 | $ | 20.7 | ||||||||
Increases in tax positions for prior years
|
0.4 | 0.3 | ||||||||||
Decreases in tax positions for prior years
|
| (0.5 | ) | |||||||||
Increases in tax positions for current year
|
3.2 | 6.1 | ||||||||||
Lapse in statue of limitations
|
(0.5 | ) | (0.5 | ) | ||||||||
Balance at December 31
|
$ | 29.2 | $ | 26.1 | ||||||||
The current year increase was primarily due to tax positions
taken, or expected to be taken, on certain foreign income tax
returns.
We, or one of our subsidiaries, file income tax returns with the
United States Internal Revenue Service, as well as various state
and foreign authorities. The following table summarizes tax
years that remain subject to examination by major jurisdiction:
Open Tax Year | |||||
Examination in |
Examination not yet |
||||
Jurisdiction | progress | initiated | |||
United States
|
|||||
Federal
|
2004-2006 | 2007 and 2008 | |||
State
|
2004 | 2003 2008 | |||
Germany(1)
|
2003-2006 | 2007 and 2008 | |||
France
|
N/A | 2006 2008 | |||
United Kingdom
|
N/A | 2006 2008 | |||
Philippines
|
2005 2007 | 2008 | |||
(1) | includes provincial or similar local jurisdictions, as applicable. |
The amount of income taxes we pay is subject to ongoing audits
by federal, state and foreign tax authorities, which often
result in proposed assessments. Management performs a
comprehensive review of its global tax positions on a quarterly
basis and accrues amounts for uncertain tax positions. Based on
these reviews and the result of discussions and resolutions of
matters with certain tax authorities and the closure of tax
years subject to tax audit, reserves are adjusted as necessary.
However, future results may include favorable or unfavorable
adjustments to our estimated tax liabilities in the period the
assessments are determined or resolved or as such statutes are
closed. Due to potential for resolution of federal, state and
foreign examinations, and the expiration of various statutes of
limitation, it is reasonably possible our gross unrecognized tax
benefits balance may change within the next twelve months by a
range of zero to $8.8 million. Substantially all of this
range relates to tax positions taken in the U.S. and in
Germany.
We recognize interest and penalties related to uncertain tax
positions as income tax expense. Interest expense recognized in
2008 and 2007, respectively, totaled $2.6 million and
$1.8 million. We did not record any penalties associated
with uncertain tax positions during 2008 or 2007.
10. | STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION |
On April 25, 2005, shareholders approved the P. H.
Glatfelter 2005 Long Term Incentive Plan (2005 Plan)
to authorize, among other things, the issuance of up to
1,500,000 shares of Glatfelter common stock to eligible
participants. The 2005 Plan provides for the issuance of
restricted stock units, restricted stock awards, non-qualified
stock options, performance shares, incentive stock options and
performance units. As of December 31, 2008,
380,917 shares of common stock were available for future
issuance under the 2005 Plan.
During 2008, 2007 and 2006, we recognized non-cash stock-based
compensation expense totaling $4.4 million,
$3.8 million and $2.3 million, respectively. Since the
approval of the 2005 Plan, we have issued to eligible
participants restricted stock units and stock only stock
appreciation rights.
Restricted Stock Units
(RSU) Awards of RSU are made under
our 2005 Plan. Under terms of the awards, the RSUs vest based
solely on the passage of time on a graded scale over a three,
four, and five-year period. The following table summarizes RSU
activity during the past three years:
Units | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | ||||||||||||
Beginning balance
|
505,173 | 411,154 | 290,662 | ||||||||||||
Granted
|
137,649 | 127,423 | 145,398 | ||||||||||||
Forfeited
|
(25,214 | ) | (33,404 | ) | (24,906 | ) | |||||||||
Restriction lapsed/shares delivered
|
(130,620 | ) | | | |||||||||||
Ending balance
|
486,988 | 505,173 | 411,154 | ||||||||||||
Dollars in thousands
|
|||||||||||||||
Compensation expense
|
$ | 1,772 | $ | 1,768 | $ | 1,107 | |||||||||
The weighted average grant fair value per unit for awards in
2008, 2007 and 2006 was $14.82, $15.32
-34-
GLATFELTER
Table of Contents
and $16.10, respectively. As of December 31, 2008,
unrecognized compensation expense for outstanding RSUs totaled
$2.6 million. The weighted average remaining period over
which the expense will be recognized is 3.3 years.
Non-Qualified Stock Options and Stock Only Stock Appreciation
Rights (SOSARs) The following tables summarize
the activity with respect to non-qualified stock options and
SOSARS:
2008 | 2007 | 2006 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Weighted- |
Weighted- |
Weighted- |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Average |
Average |
Average |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Non-Qualified Options | Shares | Exercise Price | Shares | Exercise Price | Shares | Exercise Price | |||||||||||||||||||||
Outstanding at beginning of year
|
700,270 | $ | 13.81 | 906,210 | $ | 14.06 | 1,553,209 | $ | 14.06 | ||||||||||||||||||
Granted
|
| | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Exercised
|
(64,400 | ) | 12.64 | (105,190 | ) | 13.78 | (560,239 | ) | 13.38 | ||||||||||||||||||
Canceled
|
(98,170 | ) | 13.08 | (100,750 | ) | 17.07 | (86,760 | ) | 17.27 | ||||||||||||||||||
Outstanding at end of year
|
537,700 | 14.08 | 700,270 | 13.81 | 906,210 | 14.17 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Exercisable at end of year
|
537,700 | $ | 14.08 | 700,270 | $ | 13.81 | 906,210 | $ | 14.17 | ||||||||||||||||||
Options Outstanding | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Weighted- |
Options Exercisable | |||||||||||||||||||||
Average |
Weighted- |
Weighted- |
||||||||||||||||||||
Remaining |
Average |
Average |
||||||||||||||||||||
Non-Qualified Options | Shares | Contractual Life | Exercise Price | Shares | Exercise Price | |||||||||||||||||
$10.78 to $11.36
|
39,000 | 4.9 | $ | 11.22 | 39,000 | $ | 11.22 | |||||||||||||||
12.95 to 14.44
|
295,000 | 2.6 | 13.38 | 295,000 | 13.38 | |||||||||||||||||
15.47 to 15.47
|
186,200 | 3.0 | 15.47 | 186,200 | 15.47 | |||||||||||||||||
17.54 to 17.54
|
17,500 | 3.3 | 17.54 | 17,500 | 17.54 | |||||||||||||||||
537,700 | 2.9 | 537,700 | ||||||||||||||||||||
All options expire on the earlier of termination or, in some
instances, a defined period subsequent to termination of
employment, or ten years from the date of grant. The exercise
price represents the quoted market price of Glatfelter common
stock on the date of grant, or the average quoted market prices
of Glatfelter common stock on the first day before and after the
date of grant for which quoted market price information was
available if such information was not available on the date of
grant.
Under terms of the SOSAR, the recipients received the right to
receive a payment in the form of shares of common stock equal to
the difference, if any, in the fair market value of one share of
common stock at the time of exercising the SOSAR and the strike
price. The SOSARs, which vest ratably over a three year period.
2008 | 2007 | ||||||||||||||||||
Wtd Avg |
Wtd Avg |
||||||||||||||||||
Exercise |
Exercise |
||||||||||||||||||
SOSARS | Shares | Price | Shares | Price | |||||||||||||||
Outstanding at Jan. 1,
|
484,800 | $ | 15.30 | | | ||||||||||||||
Granted
|
284,240 | 13.49 | 493,100 | $ | 15.31 | ||||||||||||||
Exercised
|
| | | | |||||||||||||||
Canceled
|
(50,230 | ) | 14.63 | (8,300 | ) | 15.94 | |||||||||||||
Outstanding at Dec. 31,
|
718,810 | $ | 14.63 | 484,800 | $ | 15.30 | |||||||||||||
Exercisable at Dec. 31,
|
150,967 | 15.30 | | | |||||||||||||||
Vested and expected to vest
|
690,418 | 460,560 | |||||||||||||||||
Weighted average granted date fair value per share
|
$ | 3.77 | $ | 4.63 | |||||||||||||||
Aggregate grant date fair value (in thousands)
|
$ | 1,002 | $ | 2,079 | |||||||||||||||
Black-Scholes Assumptions Dividend yield
|
2.67 | % | 2.35 | % | |||||||||||||||
Risk free rate of return
|
3.71 | 4.27 | |||||||||||||||||
Volatility
|
32.09 | 31.87 | |||||||||||||||||
Expected life
|
6 yrs | 6 yrs | |||||||||||||||||
11. | RETIREMENT PLANS AND OTHER POST-RETIREMENT BENEFITS |
We hav e both funded and, with respect to our international
operations, unfunded noncontributory defined-benefit pension
plans covering substantially all of our employees. The benefits
are based, in the case of certain plans, on average salary and
years of service and, in the case of other plans, on a fixed
amount for each year of service. U.S. Plan provisions and
funding meet the requirements of the Employee Retirement Income
Security Act of 1974. We use a December 31-measurement date for
all of our defined benefit plans.
We also provide certain health care benefits to eligible retired
employees. These benefits include a comprehensive medical plan
for retirees prior to age 65 and fixed supplemental premium
payments to certain retirees over age 65 to help defray the
costs of Medicare. The plan is partially funded and claims are
paid as reported.
-35-
GLATFELTER
Table of Contents
Pension Benefits | Other Benefits | |||||||||||||||||||
In millions | 2008 | 2007 | 2008 | 2007 | ||||||||||||||||
Change in Benefit Obligation
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at beginning of year
|
$ | 373.3 | $ | 378.7 | $55.3 | $57.9 | ||||||||||||||
Service cost
|
8.3 | 9.6 | 2.1 | 2.0 | ||||||||||||||||
Interest cost
|
23.1 | 21.8 | 3.2 | 3.0 | ||||||||||||||||
Plan amendments
|
6.5 | (6.4 | ) | | (1.2 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Actuarial (gain)/loss
|
2.6 | (7.1 | ) | 2.5 | (1.7 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Participant contributions
|
| | 0.9 | 0.8 | ||||||||||||||||
Benefits paid
|
(27.5 | ) | (23.3 | ) | (5.4 | ) | (5.5 | ) | ||||||||||||
Balance at end of year
|
$ | 386.3 | $ | 373.3 | $58.6 | $55.3 | ||||||||||||||
Change in Plan Assets
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year
|
$ | 603.6 | $ | 579.0 | $9.9 | $10.5 | ||||||||||||||
Actual return on plan assets
|
(177.7 | ) | 45.6 | (2.9 | ) | 0.8 | ||||||||||||||
Employer contributions
|
2.2 | 2.3 | 3.2 | 3.3 | ||||||||||||||||
Participant contributions
|
| | 0.9 | 0.8 | ||||||||||||||||
Benefits paid
|
(27.5 | ) | (23.3 | ) | (5.4 | ) | (5.5 | ) | ||||||||||||
Fair value of plan assets at end of year
|
400.6 | 603.6 | 5.7 | 9.9 | ||||||||||||||||
Funded status at end of year
|
$ | 14.3 | $ | 230.3 | $(52.9 | ) | $(45.4 | ) | ||||||||||||
The net prepaid pension cost for qualified pension plans is
primarily included in Other assets, and the accrued
pension cost for non-qualified pension plans and accrued
post-retirement benefit costs are primarily included in
Other long-term liabilities on the Consolidated
Balance Sheets at December 31, 2008 and 2007.
Amounts recognized in the consolidated balance sheets consist of
the following as of December 31:
Pension Benefits | Other Benefits | |||||||||||||||||||
In millions | 2008 | 2007 | 2008 | 2007 | ||||||||||||||||
Other long-term assets
|
$ | 44.5 | $ | 259.4 | $ | $ | ||||||||||||||
Other long-term liabilities
|
(30.2 | ) | (29.1 | ) | (52.9 | ) | (45.4 | ) | ||||||||||||
Net amount recognized
|
$ | 14.3 | $ | 230.3 | $(52.9 | ) | $(45.4 | ) | ||||||||||||
The components of amounts recognized as Accumulated other
comprehensive income consist of the following on a pre-tax
basis:
Pension Benefits | Other Benefits | |||||||||||||||||||
In millions | 2008 | 2007 | 2008 | 2007 | ||||||||||||||||
Prior service cost/(credit)
|
$ | 16.5 | $ | 12.4 | $ | (6.5 | ) | $ | (7.8 | ) | ||||||||||
Net actuarial loss
|
259.9 | 29.7 | 23.4 | 18.3 | ||||||||||||||||
The accumulated benefit obligation for all defined benefit
pension plans was $367.3 million and $355.5 million at
December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
The weighted-average assumptions used in computing the benefit
obligations above were as follows:
Pension Benefits | Other Benefits | |||||||||||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | 2008 | 2007 | |||||||||||||||||
Discount rate benefit obligation
|
6.25 | % | 6.25 | % | 6.25 | % | 6.25 | % | ||||||||||||
Future compensation growth rate
|
4.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 | ||||||||||||||||
Information for pension plans with an accumulated benefit
obligation in excess of plan assets was as follows:
In millions | 2008 | 2007 | |||||||||
Projected benefit obligation
|
$ | 30.2 | $ | 29.3 | |||||||
Accumulated benefit obligation
|
27.2 | 27.8 | |||||||||
Fair value of plan assets
|
| | |||||||||
Net periodic benefit (income) cost includes the following
components:
Year Ended December 31 | |||||||||||||||
In millions | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | ||||||||||||
Pension Benefits
|
|||||||||||||||
Service cost
|
$8.3 | $9.6 | $6.0 | ||||||||||||
Interest cost
|
23.1 | 21.8 | 20.1 | ||||||||||||
Expected return on plan assets
|
(50.1 | ) | (47.5 | ) | (44.9 | ) | |||||||||
Amortization of prior service cost
|
2.3 | 2.4 | 1.8 | ||||||||||||
Amortization of actuarial loss
|
0.3 | 0.8 | | ||||||||||||
Net periodic benefit income
|
(16.1 | ) | (12.9 | ) | (17.0 | ) | |||||||||
Special termination benefits
|
| | 4.4 | ||||||||||||
Total net periodic benefit income
|
$(16.1 | ) | $(12.9 | ) | $(12.6 | ) | |||||||||
Other Benefits
|
|||||||||||||||
Service cost
|
$2.1 | $2.0 | $1.7 | ||||||||||||
Interest cost
|
3.2 | 3.0 | 3.0 | ||||||||||||
Expected return on plan assets
|
(0.8 | ) | (0.9 | ) | | ||||||||||
Amortization of prior service cost
|
(1.3 | ) | (1.0 | ) | (0.7 | ) | |||||||||
Amortization of actuarial loss
|
1.3 | 1.0 | 1.3 | ||||||||||||
Net periodic benefit cost
|
4.5 | 4.1 | 5.3 | ||||||||||||
Special termination benefits
|
| | 3.3 | ||||||||||||
Total net periodic benefit cost
|
$4.5 | $4.1 | $8.6 | ||||||||||||
The estimated net loss and prior service cost for our defined
benefit pension plans that will be amortized from accumulated
other comprehensive income into net periodic benefit cost over
the next fiscal year are $12.5 million and
$2.1 million, respectively.
The weighted-average assumptions used in computing the net
periodic benefit (income) cost information above were as follows:
Year Ended December 31 | |||||||||||||||
In millions | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | ||||||||||||
Pension Benefits
|
|||||||||||||||
Discount rate benefit expense
|
6.25 | % | 5.75 | % | 5.5 | % | |||||||||
Future compensation growth rate
|
4.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 | ||||||||||||
Expected long-term rate of return on plan assets
|
8.5 | 8.5 | 8.5 | ||||||||||||
Other Benefits
|
|||||||||||||||
Discount rate benefit expense
|
6.25 | % | 5.75 | % | 5.5 | % | |||||||||
Expected long-term rate of return on plan assets
|
8.5 | 8.5 | | ||||||||||||
To develop the expected long-term rate of return assumption, we
considered the historical returns and the future expected
returns for each asset class, as well as the target asset
allocation of the pension portfolio.
Assumed health care cost trend rates used to determine benefit
obligations at December 31 were as follows:
2008 | 2007 | |||||||||||
Health care cost trend rate assumed for next year
|
8.75 | % | 9.5 | % | ||||||||
Rate to which the cost trend rate is assumed to decline (the
ultimate trend rate)
|
4.5 | 5.0 | ||||||||||
Year that the rate reaches the ultimate rate
|
2021 | 2015 | ||||||||||
Assumed health care cost trend rates have a significant effect
on the amounts reported for health care
-36-
GLATFELTER
Table of Contents
plans. A one percentage-point change in assumed health care cost
trend rates would have the following effects:
One Percentage Point | ||||||||||
In millions | Increase | decrease | ||||||||
Effect on:
|
||||||||||
Post-retirement benefit obligation
|
$ | 3.8 | $ | 3.5 | ||||||
Total of service and interest cost components
|
0.4 | 0.4 | ||||||||
Plan Assets Glatfelters pension plan
weighted-average allocations at December 31, 2008 and 2007,
by asset category, are as follows:
2008 | 2007 | ||||||||||
Asset Category
|
|||||||||||
Equity securities
|
63 | % | 72 | % | |||||||
Cash and fixed income
|
37 | 28 | |||||||||
Total
|
100 | % | 100 | % | |||||||
Our objective is to achieve an above-market rate of return on
our pension plan assets. Based upon this objective, along with
the timing of benefit payments and the risks associated with
various asset classes available for investment, we have
established the following asset allocation guidelines:
Minimum | Target | Maximum | ||||||||||||
Equity
|
60 | % | 70 | % | 80 | % | ||||||||
Fixed Income & Other
|
20 | 30 | 40 | |||||||||||
Real estate can be between 0% and 5% of the target equity
allocation. Glatfelter stock can also be between 0% and 5% of
the target equity allocation, although there were no holdings of
Glatfelter stock as of December 31, 2008 or 2007. Our
investment policy prohibits the investment in certain securities
without the approval of the Finance Committee of the Board of
Directors. Regarding Fixed Income securities, the
weighted-average credit quality will be at least AA
with a BBB minimum credit quality for each issue.
Cash Flow We do not expect to make
contributions to our qualified pension plans in 2009.
Contributions expected to be made in 2009 under our
non-qualified pension plans and other benefit plans are
summarized below:
In thousands | ||||||
Nonqualified pension plans
|
$ | 1,618 | ||||
Other benefit plans
|
4,091 | |||||
The following benefit payments, which reflect expected future
service, as appropriate, are expected to be paid:
In thousands | Pension Benefits | Other Benefits | ||||||||||
2009
|
$ | 29,462 | $ | 5,712 | ||||||||
2010
|
28,768 | 5,653 | ||||||||||
2011
|
29,097 | 5,657 | ||||||||||
2012
|
29,346 | 5,406 | ||||||||||
2013
|
30,054 | 5,006 | ||||||||||
2014 through 2018
|
169,745 | 23,098 | ||||||||||
Defined Contribution Plans We maintain 401(k)
plans for certain hourly and salaried employees. Employees may
contribute up to 15% of their salary to these plans, subject to
certain restrictions. We will match a portion of the
employees contribution, subject to certain limitations, in
the form of shares of Glatfelter common stock. The expense
associated with our 401(k) match was $0.9 million,
$1.5 million and $1.2 million in 2008, 2007 and 2006,
respectively.
12. | INVENTORIES |
Inventories, net of reserves were as follows:
In thousands | 2008 | 2007 | ||||||||||
Raw materials
|
$ | 49,083 | $ | 41,119 | ||||||||
In-process and finished
|
97,390 | 102,219 | ||||||||||
Supplies
|
46,881 | 49,704 | ||||||||||
Total
|
$ | 193,354 | $ | 193,042 | ||||||||
If we had valued all inventories using the average-cost method,
inventories would have been $16.9 million and
$12.9 million higher than reported at December 31,
2008 and 2007, respectively. During 2008 and 2007, we liquidated
certain LIFO inventories, the effect of which did not have a
significant impact on results of operations.
13. | PLANT, EQUIPMENT AND TIMBERLANDS |
Plant, equipment and timberlands at December 31 were as follows:
In thousands | 2008 | 2007 | ||||||||||
Land and buildings
|
$ | 131,258 | $ | 136,875 | ||||||||
Machinery and equipment
|
964,502 | 960,133 | ||||||||||
Other
|
90,535 | 90,448 | ||||||||||
Accumulated depreciation
|
(722,630 | ) | (680,804 | ) | ||||||||
463,665 | 506,652 | |||||||||||
Construction in progress
|
17,141 | 11,607 | ||||||||||
Asset retirement Lagoons
|
11,085 | | ||||||||||
Timberlands, less depletion
|
1,673 | 1,607 | ||||||||||
Total
|
$ | 493,564 | $ | 519,866 | ||||||||
14. | GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS |
The following table sets forth information with respect to
goodwill and other intangible assets which are recorded in the
caption Other long-term assets in the accompanying
Consolidated Balance Sheets:
December 31 | ||||||||||||
In thousands | 2008 | 2007 | ||||||||||
Goodwill Composite Fibers
|
$ | 16,513 | $ | 18,520 | ||||||||
Specialty Papers
|
||||||||||||
Customer relationships
|
$ | 6,155 | $ | 6,155 | ||||||||
Composite Fibers
|
||||||||||||
Technology and related
|
3,931 | 5,409 | ||||||||||
Customer relationships
|
291 | 401 | ||||||||||
Total intangibles
|
10,377 | 11,965 | ||||||||||
Accumulated amortization
|
(2,534 | ) | (1,032 | ) | ||||||||
Net intangibles
|
$ | 7,843 | $ | 10,933 | ||||||||
-37-
GLATFELTER
Table of Contents
In thousands | 2008 | 2007 | ||||||||||
Aggregate amortization expense:
|
||||||||||||
2008
|
$ | 999 | $ | 1,032 | ||||||||
Estimated amortization expense:
|
||||||||||||
2009
|
$ | 999 | ||||||||||
2010
|
999 | |||||||||||
2011
|
999 | |||||||||||
2012
|
999 | |||||||||||
2013
|
999 | |||||||||||
In connection with the acquisition of MPL, we recorded
$2.2 million of goodwill. The remaining weighted average
useful life of intangible assets was 9 years at
December 31, 2008.
15. | OTHER LONG-TERM ASSETS |
Other long-term assets consist of the following:
December 31 | ||||||||||||
In thousands | 2008 | 2007 | ||||||||||
Pension
|
$ | 44,460 | $ | 259,445 | ||||||||
Installment notes receivable
|
81,033 | 81,033 | ||||||||||
Goodwill and intangibles
|
24,356 | 29,453 | ||||||||||
Other
|
22,077 | 23,858 | ||||||||||
Total
|
$ | 171,926 | $ | 393,789 | ||||||||
16. | OTHER CURRENT LIABILITIES |
Other current liabilities consist of the following:
December 31 | ||||||||||||
In thousands | 2008 | 2007 | ||||||||||
Accrued payroll and benefits
|
$ | 39,672 | $ | 37,210 | ||||||||
Other accrued compensation and retirement benefits
|
6,560 | 5,963 | ||||||||||
Income taxes payable
|
6,163 | 10,195 | ||||||||||
Accrued rebates
|
16,205 | 19,707 | ||||||||||
Other accrued expenses
|
32,304 | 28,041 | ||||||||||
Total
|
$ | 100,904 | $ | 101,116 | ||||||||
17. | LONG-TERM DEBT |
Long-term debt is summarized as follows:
December 31 | ||||||||||||
In thousands | 2008 | 2007 | ||||||||||
Revolving credit facility, due April 2011
|
$ | 6,724 | $ | 35,049 | ||||||||
Term Loan, due April 2011
|
30,000 | 43,000 | ||||||||||
71/8% Notes,
due May 2016
|
200,000 | 200,000 | ||||||||||
Term Loan, due January 2013
|
36,695 | | ||||||||||
Note payable due March 2013
|
34,000 | 34,000 | ||||||||||
Total long-term debt
|
307,419 | 312,049 | ||||||||||
Less current portion
|
(13,759 | ) | (11,008 | ) | ||||||||
Long-term debt, excluding current portion
|
$ | 293,660 | $ | 301,041 | ||||||||
On April 3, 2006, we, along with certain of our
subsidiaries as borrowers and certain of our subsidiaries as
guarantors, entered into a credit agreement with certain
financial institutions. Pursuant to the credit agreement, we may
borrow, repay and reborrow revolving credit loans in an
aggregate principal amount not to exceed $200 million
outstanding at any time. All borrowings under our credit
facility are unsecured. The revolving credit commitment expires
on April 2, 2011.
In addition, on April 3, 2006, pursuant to the credit
agreement, we received a term loan in the principal amount of
$100 million. Quarterly repayments of principal outstanding
under the term loan began on March 31, 2007 with the final
principal payment due on April 2, 2011. In addition, if
certain prepayment events occur, such as a sale of assets, the
incurrence of additional indebtedness in excess of
$30.0 million in the aggregate, or issuance of additional
equity; we must repay a specified portion of the term loan
within five days of the prepayment event.
Borrowings under the credit agreement bear interest, at our
option, at either (a) the banks base rate described
in the credit agreement as the greater of the prime rate or the
federal funds rate plus 50 basis points, or (b) the
EURO rate based generally on the London Interbank Offer Rate,
plus an applicable margin that varies from 67.5 basis
points to 137.5 basis points according to our corporate
credit rating determined by S&P and Moodys.
We have the right to prepay the term loan and revolving credit
borrowings in whole or in part without premium or penalty,
subject to timing conditions related to the interest rate option
chosen.
The credit agreement contains a number of customary covenants
for financings of this type that, among other things, restrict
our ability to dispose of or create liens on assets, incur
additional indebtedness, repay other indebtedness, create liens
on assets, make acquisitions and engage in mergers or
consolidations. We are also required to comply with specified
financial tests and ratios, each as defined in the credit
agreement, including a consolidated minimum net worth test and a
maximum debt to earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation
and amortization (EBITDA) ratio. A breach of these
requirements, of which we were not aware of any at
December 31, 2008, would give rise to certain remedies
under the credit agreement as amended, among which are the
termination of the agreement and accelerated repayment of the
outstanding borrowings plus accrued and unpaid interest under
the credit facility.
On April 28, 2006 we completed an offering of
$200.0 million aggregate principal amount of our
71/8% Senior
Notes due 2016. Net proceeds from this offering totaled
approximately $196.4 million, after deducting the
commissions and other fees and expenses relating to the
offering. The proceeds were primarily used to redeem
$150.0 million aggregate principal amount of our then
outstanding
67/8% notes
due July 2007, plus the
-38-
GLATFELTER
Table of Contents
payment of applicable redemption premium and accrued interest.
Interest on these Senior Notes accrues at the rate of
71/8%
per annum and is payable semiannually in arrears on May 1 and
November 1.
Prior to May 1, 2011, we may redeem all, but not less than
all, of the notes at a redemption price equal to 100% of the
principal amount thereof plus accrued and unpaid interest, if
any, plus a make-whole premium. On or after
May 1, 2011, we may redeem some or all of the notes at
specified redemption prices. In addition, prior to May 1,
2009, we may redeem up to 35% of the aggregate principal amount
of the notes using the net proceeds from certain equity
offerings.
The
71/8% Senior
Note agreement contains a cross-default clause that
provides if there were to be an event of default under the
credit agreement discussed earlier, we would also be in default
under the
71/8% Senior
Notes.
In November 2007, we sold timberlands and as consideration
received a $43.2 million,
20-year
interest bearing note receivable from the timberland buyer (the
Glawson Note). In January 2008, we monetized the
Glawson Note. In this transaction, we entered into a new
$36.7 million term loan agreement (the 2008 Term
Loan) with a financial institution. The 2008 Term Loan
matures in five years, bears interest at a six-month reserve
adjusted LIBOR plus a margin rate of 1.20% per annum. This is
secured by, among other assets, the Glawson Note, together with
letter of credit issued in our favor backing the collectability
of the Glawson Note.
On March 21, 2003, we sold timberlands and received as
consideration a $37.9 million
10-year
interest bearing note receivable from the timberland buyer. We
pledged this note as collateral under a $34.0 million
promissory note payable to SunTrust Financial (the Note
Payable). The Note Payable, as amended, bears a fixed rate
of interest of 3.10% and matures in March 2013.
The following schedule sets forth the maturity of our long-term
debt during the indicated year.
In thousands | ||||||
2009
|
$13,759 | |||||
2010
|
13,759 | |||||
2011
|
9,206 | |||||
2012
|
| |||||
2013
|
70,695 | |||||
Thereafter
|
200,000 | |||||
P. H. Glatfelter Company guarantees all debt obligations of its
subsidiaries. All such obligations are recorded in these
consolidated financial statements.
At December 31, 2008 and 2007, we had $12.1 million
and $14.1 million, respectively, of letters of credit
issued to us by a financial institution. Such letters of c redit
reduce amounts available under our revolving credit facility.
The letters of credit provide financial assurances for
i) commitments made related to the Fox River environmental
matter, ii) for the benefit of certain state workers
compensation insurance agencies in conjunction with our
self-insurance program, and iii) assurance related to the
purchase of certain utilities for our manufacturing facilities.
We bear the credit risk on this amount to the extent that we do
not comply with the provisions of certain agreements. As of
December 31, 2008, no amounts were outstanding under the
letters of credit. In January 2009, a $6.5 million letter
of credit included in the amount above was cancelled in
connection with the cash funding to the Fox River OU1 escrow
account for the same amount.
18. | ASSET RETIREMENT OBLIGATION |
During 2008, we recorded $11.5 million, net present value,
of asset retirement obligations related to the legal requirement
to close several lagoons at the Spring Grove, PA facility.
Historically, lagoons were used to dispose of residual waste
material. Closure of the lagoons, which is expected to occur
over the next eight years, will be accomplished by filling the
lagoons, installing a non-permeable liner which will be covered
with soil to construct the required cap over the lagoons. The
amount referred to above was accrued with a corresponding
increase in the carrying value of the property, equipment and
timberlands caption on the consolidated balance sheet. The
amount capitalized is being depreciated on the straight-line
basis in relation to the expected closure period. Following is a
summary of activity recorded during 2008:
In thousands | Liability | |||||
Original estimate
|
$11,487 | |||||
Accretion
|
229 | |||||
Payments
|
(110 | ) | ||||
Balance at December 31, 2008
|
$11,606 | |||||
Of the total liability set forth above, $1.6 million is
recorded in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet under
the caption Other current liabilities and
$10.0 million is recorded under the caption Other
long-term liabilities.
19. | SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
The following table summarizes outstanding shares of common
stock:
Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||
In thousands | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | ||||||||||||
Shares outstanding at beginning of year
|
45,143 | 44,821 | 44,132 | ||||||||||||
Treasury shares issued for:
|
|||||||||||||||
Restricted stock performance awards
|
94 | | 14 | ||||||||||||
401(k) plan
|
119 | 206 | 108 | ||||||||||||
Director compensation
|
14 | 11 | 7 | ||||||||||||
Employee stock options exercised
|
64 | 105 | 560 | ||||||||||||
Shares outstanding at end of year
|
45,434 | 45,143 | 44,821 | ||||||||||||
-39-
GLATFELTER
Table of Contents
20. | COMMITMENTS, CONTINGENCIES AND LEGAL PROCEEDINGS |
Contractual Commitments The following table
summarizes the minimum annual payments due on noncancelable
operating leases and other similar contractual obligations
having initial or remaining terms in excess of one year:
In thousands | Leases | Other | ||||||||
2009
|
$6,544 | $130,361 | ||||||||
2010
|
3,080 | 30,151 | ||||||||
2011
|
1,876 | 18,101 | ||||||||
2012
|
1,194 | | ||||||||
2013
|
834 | | ||||||||
Thereafter
|
7,952 | |||||||||
Other contractual obligations primarily represent minimum
purchase commitments under energy and pulp wood supply contracts
and other purchase obligations.
At December 31, 2008, required minimum annual payments due
under operating leases and other similar contractual obligations
aggregated $21.5 million and $178.6 million,
respectively.
Fox
River Neenah, Wisconsin
Background We have significant
uncertainties associated with environmental claims arising out
of the presence of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs)
in sediments in the lower Fox River and in the Bay of Green Bay
Wisconsin (Site). As part of the 1979 acquisition of
the Bergstrom Paper Company we acquired a facility located at
the Site (the Neenah Facility). In part, the Neenah
Facility used wastepaper as a source of fiber. At no time did
the Neenah Facility utilize PCBs in the pulp and paper making
process, but discharges to the lower Fox River from the Neenah
Facility which may have contained PCBs from wastepaper may have
occurred from 1954 to the late 1970s. Any PCBs that our Neenah
Facility discharged into the lower Fox River resulted from the
presence of PCBs in
NCR®-brand
carbonless copy paper in the wastepaper that was recycled at the
Neenah Facility. We closed the Neenah Facility in June 2006.
The United States, the State of Wisconsin and various state and
federal governmental agencies (collectively, the
Governments), as well as private parties, have found
PCBs in sediments on the bed of the Fox River, apparently from a
number of sources at municipal and industrial facilities along
the upstream and downstream portions of the Site. The
Governments have identified manufacturing and recycling of
NCR®-brand
carbonless copy paper as the principal source of that
contamination.
The United States Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA) has divided the lower Fox River and the Bay of
Green Bay site into five operable units numbered
from the most upstream (OU1) to the most downstream
(OU5). OU1 is the reach from primarily Lake
Winnebago to the dam at Appleton, and is comprised of Little
Lake Butte des Morts. Our Neenah Facility discharged its
wastewater into OU1. OU2 extends from the dam at Appleton to the
dam at Little Rapids, OU3 from the dam at Little Rapids to the
dam at De Pere, OU4 from the dam at De Pere to the mouth of the
river, and OU5 from the mouth into the lower portion of Green
Bay. The river extends 39 miles from the upstream end of
OU1 to the downstream end of OU4.
Our liabilities, if any, for this contamination primarily arise
under the federal Comprehensive Environmental, Response,
Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA or
Superfund). The Governments have sought to recover
response actions or response costs,
which are the costs of studying and cleaning up contamination,
from various responsible parties. In addition,
various natural resource trustee agencies of the United States,
the States of Wisconsin and Michigan, and several Indian Tribes
have sought to recover natural resource damages
(NRDs), including natural resource damage assessment
costs. Parties that have incurred response costs or NRDs either
voluntarily or in response to the governments and
trustees demands may have an opportunity to seek
contribution or other recovery of some or all of those costs
from other parties who are jointly and severally responsible
under Superfund for those costs. Therefore, as we incur costs,
we also acquire a claim against other parties who may not have
paid their equitable share of those costs. As others incur
costs, they acquire a claim against us to the extent that they
claim that we have not paid our equitable share of the total.
Any party that resolves its liability to the United States or a
state in a judicially or administratively approved settlement
agreement obtains protection from contribution claims for
matters addressed in the settlement.
For these reasons, all of the parties who are potentially
responsible (PRPs) under CERCLA for response costs
or NRDs have exposure to liability for: (a) the cost of
past response actions taken by anyone else, (b) the cost of
past NRD payments or restoration projects incurred by anyone
else, (c) the cost of response actions to be taken in the
future, and (d) NRDs. All of this exposure is subject to
substantial defenses, including, for example, that the PRP is
not liable or not jointly and severally liable for any
particular cost or damage, that the cost or damage is not
recoverable under CERCLA or any other law, or that the recovery
is barred by the passage of time. In addition, a party that has
incurred or committed to incur costs or has paid NRDs may be
able to claim credit for that cost or payment in any equitable
allocation of response costs or NRDs in any action for
reallocation of costs.
-40-
GLATFELTER
Table of Contents
Cleanup Decisions. Our liability exposure
depends importantly on the decisions made by EPA and the
Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources (WDNR) as
to how the Site will be cleaned up, and consequently the costs
and timing of those response actions. The nature of the response
actions has been highly controversial. EPA issued a record of
decision (ROD) selecting response actions for OU1
and OU2 in December 2002. EPA issued a separate ROD selecting
response actions for OU3, OU4, and OU5 in March 2004.
As the result of continuing discussions with parties other than
us, as well as our experience in OU1 (discussed below), EPA
amended the ROD for OU2-5 in June 2007 to rely less on dredging
and more on capping and covering of sediments containing PCBs.
The governments project that these methods will allow certain
costs to be lower for this portion of the cleanup. In June 2008,
EPA amended the ROD for OU1.
NRD Assessment. The natural resources trustees
have engaged in work to assess NRDs at and arising from the
Site. However, they have not completed a required NRD Assessment
under the pertinent regulations. The trustees estimate of
NRDs ranges from $176 million to $333 million, some of
which has already been satisfied. With specific respect to NRD
claims, we contended that the trustees claims are barred
by the applicable 3 year statute of limitations.
Past Costs Demand. By letter dated
January 15, 2009, EPA demanded that we and six other
parties reimburse EPA for approximately $17.6 million in
costs that EPA claims it incurred as necessary costs of response
not subject to any other agreement in this matter. The
supporting documentation provided by EPA has not yet allowed us
fully to evaluate this demand, and, accordingly we are unable to
reasonably estimate our potential liability.
Work Under Agreements, Orders, and Decrees. As
we mention above, our exposure to liability depends on the
amount of work done, costs incurred, and damages paid both by us
and by others. The procedural context of the work done, costs
incurred, and damages paid also matter.
Since 1991, the Governments and various groups of potentially
responsible parties, including us, have entered into a series of
agreements, orders, and decrees under which we and others have
performed work, incurred costs, or paid damages in connection
with the Site. As a result, some parties have contributed or
performed substantial work at the Site and at least one party,
Fort Howard Corporation (whose successor is either the
Fort James Operating Company or Georgia Pacific
Corporation) has resolved its NRD liability at the Site.
Notably, in April 2004, the United States District Court for the
Eastern District of Wisconsin entered a consent decree
(OU1 Consent Decree) in United States v.
P.H. Glatfelter Co.,
No. 2:03-cv-949,
under which we and WTM I Corp. have been implementing the remedy
in OU1, dividing costs evenly in addition to a $7 million
contribution from Menasha Corp. and a $10 million
contribution that the United States contributed from a separate
settlement in United States v. Appleton Papers Inc.,
No. 2:01-cv-816,
obligating NCR and Appleton Papers to contribute to certain NRD
projects. In June 2008, the parties entered into an amendment to
the OU1 Consent Decree (Amended OU1 Consent Decree).
The amendment allows for implementation of the amended remedy
for OU1. It also commits us and WTM I to implement that remedy
without a cost limitation on that commitment. The court entered
the Amended OU1 Consent Decree in August 2008.
Further, in November 2007, EPA issued an administrative order
for remedial action (UAO) to Appleton Papers Inc.,
CBC Coating, Inc. (formerly known as Riverside Paper
Corporation), Georgia-Pacific Consumer Products, L.P. (formerly
known as Fort James Operating Company), Menasha
Corporation, NCR Corporation, us, U.S. Paper Mills Corp.,
and WTM I Company directing those respondents to implement the
amended remedy in OU2-5. Shortly following issuance of the UAO,
Appleton Papers Inc. and NCR Corp. commenced litigation against
us and others, as described below. Accordingly, we have no
vehicle for complying with the UAOs overall requirements
other than answering a judgment in the litigation, and we have
so informed EPA. However, in February 2009, the EPA sent a
demand to each of the respondents on the UAO other than WTM I
demanding payment of the governments oversight costs under
the UAO for the period from November 2007 through August 2008.
In February 2009, we notified the EPA that we believed that its
demand could prove distracting to litigation commenced by
Appleton Papers and NCR against the other UAO respondents. In
order to remove this distraction, and in the spirit of
cooperation, we would satisfy the EPAs demand, an amount
which was insignificant, in full. We have paid this amount.
Cost estimates. Estimates of the Site
remediation change over time as we, or others, gain additional
experience. In addition, disagreement exists over the likely
costs for some of this work. The Governments estimate that the
total cost of implementing the amended remedy in OU1 will be
approximately $102 million. Because we have completed a
significant amount of work in this portion of the river, we
believe the costs of
-41-
GLATFELTER
Table of Contents
completing the remedial actions specified in the amended ROD can
be completed for this amount. However, it is reasonably possible
costs could exceed this amount by up to $10 million. The
cost of implementing the remedy set forth in the amended ROD for
OU2-5 (the downstream portions of the Site) is estimated by the
Governments to total between $270 million and
$499 million, reflecting a contingency factor of plus or
minus 30%. However, based on independent estimates commissioned
by various potentially responsible parties, we believe the
actual costs to be incurred to implement the remedy of
OU2-5 will
exceed the Governments estimate by a significant amount.
NRDs. The trustees claim that we are jointly
and severally responsible for NRDs with a value between
$176 million and $333 million. We deny
(a) liability for most of these NRDs, (b) that if
anyone is liable, that we are jointly and severally liable for
the full amount, and (c) that the trustees can pursue this
claim at this late date as the limitations period for NRD claims
is three years from discovery.
Allocation. Since 1991, various potentially
responsible parties have, without success, attempted to agree on
a binding, final, allocation of costs and damages among
themselves. All costs that they have incurred to date have been
incurred individually, or under interim, nonbinding allocations.
However, the consent decree in United States v. P.H.
Glatfelter Co. affords us and WTM I contribution protection
for claims seeking to reallocate costs of implementing the OU1
remedy, and Fort James Operating Co. (now Georgia-Pacific)
has certain rights under its consent decree. Otherwise, the
parties have not litigated their internal allocation with us.
NCR and Appleton Papers Inc. have commenced litigation in the
United States District Court for the Eastern District of
Wisconsin captioned Appleton Papers Inc. v. George A.
Whiting Paper Co.,
No. 2:08-cv-16,
seeking to reallocate costs and damages allegedly incurred or
paid or to be incurred or paid by NCR or Appleton Papers. They
have to date joined a number of defendants, dismissed some of
those, filed a parallel action, and consolidated the two cases.
At present, the case involves allocation claims among the two
plaintiffs and 28 defendants: us, George A. Whiting Paper
Co., Menasha Corporation, Green Bay Packaging Inc.,
International Paper Company, Leicht Transfer & Storage
Company, Neenah Foundry Company, Newpage Wisconsin System Inc.,
The Procter & Gamble Paper Products Company, Wisconsin
Public Service Corp., the Cities of Appleton, De Pere, and Green
Bay, Brown County, Green Bay Metropolitan Sewerage District,
Heart of the Valley Metropolitan Sewerage District,
Neenah-Menasha Sewerage Commission, WTM I Company,
U.S. Paper Mills Corporation, Georgia-Pacific Consumer
Products LP, Georgia-Pacific LLC, Fort James Operating
Company, CBC Coating Company, Inc., Fort James Corporation,
Kimberly-Clark Corporation, LaFarge North America Inc., Union
Pacific Railroad Company, and the United States Army Corps of
Engineers. As the result of certain third-party claims, federal
agencies other than the Corps of Engineers are also involved in
this allocation. That litigation may be expected to result in an
allocation of responsibility, at least as among these parties.
Eleven of the defendants have represented to the court that they
have reached an agreement in principle with the United States to
resolve their liability for this site. This group includes
George A. Whiting Paper Co.; Green Bay Metropolitan Sewerage
District; Green Bay Packaging, Inc.; Heart of the Valley
Metropolitan Sewerage District; International Paper Co.; LaFarge
North America Inc.; Leicht Transfer and Storage Co.; Neenah
Foundry Co.; Procter & Gamble Paper Products Co.;
Union Pacific Railroad Co.; and Wisconsin Public Service Corp.
We understand that this settlement will be on a de minimis
basis, but no consent decree has yet been lodged with the
court. A settlement would remove these parties from the
litigation.
The court has entered a case management order segmenting this
litigation for discovery and trial. The first phase of the
proceeding, addressing a single set of issues, is currently
scheduled for trial beginning in December 2009. Resolution of
that issue could adjudicate the entire case or it may resolve
issues sufficiently that the parties can then settle the
remaining disputes. However, there can be no assurance that this
trial will result, directly or indirectly, in a judgment or
settlement disposing of all claims among the parties.
We contend that we are not jointly and severally liable for
costs or damages arising from the presence of PCBs downstream of
OU1. In addition, we contend that NCR or other sources of
NCR®-brand
carbonless copy paper that our Neenah Mill recycled bear most of
the responsibility for costs and damages arising from the
presence of PCBs in OU1. Other parties disagree.
To date we have spent or have committed to spend nearly
$50 million implementing the remedy in OU1, and under the
various agreements, orders, and decrees under which we and
others have performed work, incurred costs, or paid damages in
connection with the Site.
Reserves for the Fox River Site. As of
December 31, 2008, our total reserve for our claimed
liability at the Fox River, including our remediation
obligations at OU1, our claimed liability for the remediation of
OU2-5, our claimed liability for NRDs associated with PCB
contamination at the Site and all pending, threatened or
-42-
GLATFELTER
Table of Contents
asserted and unasserted claims against us relating to PCB
contamination at the Site totaled $20.9 million which
includes additional amounts that were reserved in the first and
third quarter of 2007 which, in aggregate, increased our reserve
by $26.0 million. Of our total reserve for the Fox River,
$4.3 million is recorded in the accompanying consolidated
balance sheets under the caption Environmental
liabilities and the remaining $16.6 million is
recorded under the caption Other long term
liabilities.
Under the OU1 Consent Decree which was signed in 2004, we
contributed $27.0 million to past and future costs and
NRDs. We later contributed $6.0 million under an agreed
supplement to the OU1 Consent Decree and have since contributed
an additional $9.5 million under the Amended Consent
Decree. This amount includes $3.0 million contributed in
July 2008 and $6.5 million in January 2009. WTM I has
contributed parallel amounts. These funds are placed into an
escrow account from which we and WTM I pay for work on the
project. As required by the Amended Consent Decree, in a
quarterly report submitted to EPA in November 2008, we and WTM I
concluded that the amounts in the escrow account would be
sufficient to pay for the estimated cost of the work at OU1,
including operation, maintenance, and other post-construction
expenses. However, there can be no assurance that these amounts
will in fact suffice. WTM I has filed a bankruptcy petition in
the Bankruptcy Court in Richmond. There can be no assurance
should additional amounts be required to complete the project
that WTM I will be able to fulfill its obligation to pay half
the additional cost.
We believe that we have strong defenses to liability for
remediation of OU2-5 including the existence of ample data that
indicates that PCBs did not leave OU1 in concentrations that
could have caused or contributed to the need for cleanup in
OU2-5.
Others, including the EPA and other PRPs, disagree with us and,
as a result, the EPA has issued a UAO to us and to others to
perform the OU2-5 work. NCR and Appleton Papers have recently
commenced the Whiting Litigation and have joined us and others.
Additional litigation associated with the remediation of the
Site is likely. As illustrated by the Whiting Litigation, we
also note that there exist additional potentially responsible
parties other than the PRPs who were named in the UAO or who
have been joined in the Whiting Litigation, including the owners
of public wastewater treatment facilities who discharged
PCB-contaminated wastewater to the Fox River and entities
providing PCB-containing wastepaper to each of the recycling
mills.
Even if we are not successful in establishing that we are not
liable for the remediation of OU2-5, we do not believe that we
would be allocated a significant percentage share of liability
in any equitable allocation of the remediation costs and other
potential damages associated with OU2-5. The accompanying
consolidated financial statements do not include reserves for
any future litigation or defense costs for the Fox River, and
because litigation has commenced, the costs to do so could be
significant.
In setting our reserve for the Fox River, we have assessed our
defenses to liability, including matters raised in the Whiting
Litigation, and assumed that we will not bear the entire cost of
remediation and damages to the exclusion of other known PRPs at
the Site who are also potentially jointly and severally liable.
The existence and ability of other PRPs to participate has also
been taken into account in setting our reserve, and is generally
based on our evaluation of recent publicly available financial
information on each PRP, and any known insurance, indemnity or
cost sharing agreements between PRPs and third parties. In
addition, our assessment is based upon the magnitude, nature,
location and circumstances associated with the various
discharges of PCBs to the river and the relationship of those
discharges to identified contamination. We will continue to
evaluate our exposure and the level of our reserves, including,
but not limited to, our potential share of the costs and NRDs,
if any, associated with the Fox River site.
Other than with respect to the Amended OU1 Consent Decree, the
amount and timing of future expenditures for environmental
compliance, cleanup, remediation and personal injury, NRDs and
property damage liabilities cannot be ascertained with any
certainty due to, among other things, the unknown extent and
nature of any contamination, the response actions that may
ultimately be required, the availability of remediation
equipment, and landfill space, and the number and financial
resources of any other PRPs.
Other Information The Wisconsin DNR and FWS
have each published studies, the latter in draft form,
estimating the amount of PCBs discharged by each identified PRP
to the lower Fox River and the Bay of Green Bay. These reports
estimate the Neenah Facilitys share of the volumetric
discharge to be as high as 27%. We do not believe the volumetric
estimates used in these studies are accurate because
(a) the studies themselves disclose that they are not
accurate and (b) the volumetric estimates contained in the
studies are based on assumptions that are unsupported by
existing data on the Site. We believe that our volumetric
contribution is significantly lower than the estimates set forth
in these studies. Further, we do not believe that a volumetric
allocation would constitute an equitable allocation of the
potential liability for the contamination. Other factors, such
as the
-43-
GLATFELTER
Table of Contents
location of contamination, the location of discharge, and a
partys role in causing discharge, must be considered in
order for the allocation to be equitable.
We previously entered into interim cost-sharing agreements with
four of the other PRPs, which provided for those PRPs to share
certain costs relating to scientific studies of PCBs discharged
at the Site (Interim Cost Sharing Agreements). These
interim cost-sharing agreements do not establish the final
allocation of remediation costs incurred at the Site. Based upon
our evaluation of the volume, nature and location of the various
discharges of PCBs at the Site and the relationship of those
discharges to identified contamination, we believe our allocable
share of liability at the Site is less than our share of costs
under the Interim Cost Sharing Agreements.
While the Amended OU1 Consent Decree provides a negotiated
framework for resolving both our and WTM Is liability for
the remediation of OU1, it does not resolve our exposure at the
Site. The OU1 Consent Decree does not address response costs
necessary to remediate the remainder of the Site and only
addresses NRDs and claims for reimbursement of government
expenses to a limited extent. Because CERCLA imposes strict
joint and several liability, uncertainty persists regarding our
exposure with respect to the remainder of the Fox River site. In
addition, as mentioned previously, EPA has issued a UAO to us
and others calling for further work in OU2-5, and Appleton
Papers and NCR have commenced the Whiting Litigation that may
become more complicated and involve additional parties. We
cannot predict the outcome of the Whiting Litigation or any
other litigation or regulatory actions related to this matter.
Range of Reasonably Possible Outcomes Our
analysis of the range of reasonably possible outcomes is derived
from all available information, including but not limited to
official documents such as RODs, discussions with the United
States and other PRPs, as well as legal counsel and engineering
consultants. Based on our analysis of the current RODs and cost
estimates for work to be performed at the Site, we believe that
it is reasonably possible that our costs associated with the Fox
River matter may exceed our cost estimates and the aggregate
amounts accrued for the Fox River matter by amounts that are
insignificant or that could range up to $265 million over a
period that is currently undeterminable but that could range
beyond 15 years. We believe that the likelihood of an
outcome in the upper end of the monetary range is significantly
less than other possible outcomes within the range and that the
possibility of an outcome in excess of the upper end of the
monetary range is remote.
Based on currently available information, we believe that the
remaining work to complete the remediation of OU1 can be
completed with the amounts in the OU1 Escrow Account. Our
assessment assumes that: 1) we and WTM I successfully
negotiate acceptable contracts covering the work provided for in
the amended OU1 ROD; and 2) the remedial measures provided
in the amended OU1 ROD are successfully implemented. However, if
we are unsuccessful in managing our costs to implement the
amended OU1 ROD, additional charges may be necessary and
such amounts could be material.
Summary Our current assessment is that we will
be able to manage these environmental matters without a
long-term, material adverse impact on the Company. These matters
could, however, at any particular time or for any particular
year or years, have a material adverse effect on our
consolidated financial position, liquidity
and/or
results of operations or could result in a default under our
loan covenants. Moreover, there can be no assurance that our
reserves will be adequate to provide for future obligations
related to these matters, that our share of costs
and/or
damages for these matters will not exceed our available
resources, or that such obligations will not have a long-term,
material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position,
liquidity or results of operations. With regard to the Fox River
site, if we are not successful in managing the completion of the
remaining remedial work at OU1
and/or
should the United States seek to enforce the UAO for OU2-5
against us which requires us either to perform directly or to
contribute significant amounts towards the performance of that
work, those developments could have a material adverse effect on
our consolidated financial position, liquidity and results of
operations and might result in a default under our loan
covenants.
Ecusta Environmental Matters Beginning
in April 2003, government authorities, including the North
Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
(NCDENR), initiated discussions with us and other
parties regarding, among other environmental issues, certain
landfill closure liabilities associated with our former Ecusta
mill and its properties (the Ecusta Property). The
discussions focused on NCDENRs desire to establish a plan
and secure financial resources to close three landfills located
at the Ecusta Property and to address other environmental
matters at the facility. During the third quarter of 2003, the
discussions ended with NCDENRs conclusion to hold us
responsible for the closure of three landfills. Accordingly, in
2003 we established reserves totaling approximately
$7.6 million representing estimated landfill closure costs.
We have completed the closure of two landfills and are in the
process of closing the third; in addition, we have accepted
responsibility for decommissioning a fourth
-44-
GLATFELTER
Table of Contents
landfill (collectively, the Landfill Closure and
Post-Closure Obligations).
In September 2005, we established an additional
$2.7 million reserve for potential environmental
liabilities associated with the Ecusta Property relating to:
(i) mercury releases from the Electro-Chemical Building;
(ii) contamination in and operation of the aeration and
stabilization basin (the ASB), which is part of the
Ecusta Propertys wastewater treatment system; (iii) a
previously closed ash landfill (Brown #1
Landfill); and (iv) contamination in the vicinity of
a former caustic building.
On January 25, 2008, we entered into a series of agreements
(the DRV Transaction) pursuant to which we
transferred potential liabilities for certain environmental
matters at the Ecusta Property to Davidson River Village, LLC
(DRV), which contemporaneously purchased the
facility. As part of the DRV Transaction, DRV assumed, and
indemnified us for, liability arising from environmental matters
and conditions at the Ecusta Property with certain enumerated
exceptions, including the Landfill Closure and Post-Closure
Obligations and investigation and remediation (if necessary) of
any pollutants that may have migrated from the Ecusta Property
to the Davidson and French Broad Rivers (the River
Areas), which liabilities were retained by us.
DRVs assumption of liability and indemnification of us was
secured in a number of ways: (i) an escrow account was
established in the amount of $4.4 million, of which we
contributed $2.2 million, to pay for the estimated cost of
the assessment and remediation of
on-site
mercury contamination at the Ecusta Property; (ii) DRV
caused two irrevocable letters of credit totaling
$7.0 million issued by Bank of America in our favor; and
(iii) DRV purchased an insurance policy that provides
insurance coverage in the event mercury remediation costs exceed
$11.4 million in addition to $25 million of potential
third party liability. Thus, in consideration of the amount we
contributed to the escrow account and bearing a share of the
cost of the insurance policies, our potential liability for
future claims with respect to the previously disclosed
environmental matters has been transferred to DRV. Our reserve
associated with this matter was adequate to cover the amounts
contributed towards resolution of these matters. As of
December 31, 2008, approximately $2.1 million of
amounts held in escrow related to the DRV Transaction are
recorded in the accompanying balance sheet under the caption
Prepaid expenses and other current assets and a
corresponding reserve for potential liabilities in the same
amount is recorded under the caption Other current
liabilities. Notwithstanding our contractual and legal
agreements pursuant to the DRV transaction, we remain
contingently liable in the unlikely event DRV fails to perform
and the letters of credit and the insurance policy are
insufficient to satisfy the remediation required by EPA.
With respect to the River Areas, we entered into two agreements
with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA)
and/or
NCDENR. Specifically, we completed risk assessments of the River
Areas to determine the nature and extent of contamination and
threat to the public health, welfare or the environment caused
by any hazardous substances released from the Ecusta Property to
the River Areas and, if necessary, to identify and evaluate
remedial alternatives to prevent, mitigate or remedy such a
release. Based on the results of the risk assessment, we do not
believe there is any indication of levels of contamination that
would warrant any remediation activities be performed in the
River Areas. We are in the process of finalizing a report to the
EPA.
-45-
GLATFELTER
Table of Contents
21. | SEGMENT AND GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION |
The following table sets forth profitability and other
information by business unit for the year ended December 31:
Specialty Papers | Composite Fibers | Other and Unallocated | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
In thousands | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net sales
|
$833,899 | $802,293 | $693,660 | $429,952 | $346,030 | $292,751 | $(1 | ) | $ | $ | $1,263,850 | $1,148,323 | $986,411 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Energy sales, net
|
9,364 | 9,445 | 10,726 | | | | | | | 9,364 | 9,445 | 10,726 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total revenue
|
843,263 | 811,738 | 704,386 | 429,952 | 346,030 | 292,751 | $(1 | ) | | | 1,273,214 | 1,157,768 | 997,137 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cost of products sold
|
739,481 | 721,216 | 635,143 | 366,791 | 287,606 | 246,797 | (10,840 | ) | (7,366 | ) | 9,903 | 1,095,432 | 1,001,456 | 891,843 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gross profit (loss)
|
103,782 | 90,522 | 69,243 | 63,161 | 58,424 | 45,954 | 10,839 | 7,366 | (9,903 | ) | 177,782 | 156,312 | 105,294 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
SG&A
|
54,596 | 56,561 | 50,285 | 38,206 | 32,541 | 28,458 | 5,095 | 27,042 | 13,738 | 97,897 | 116,144 | 92,481 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Restructuring charges
|
| | | | | | (856 | ) | 35 | 30,318 | (856 | ) | 35 | 30,318 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gains on dispositions of plant, equipment and timberlands
|
| | | | | | (18,468 | ) | (78,685 | ) | (17,394 | ) | (18,468 | ) | (78,685 | ) | (17,394 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gain on insurance recoveries
|
| | | | | | | | (205 | ) | | | (205 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total operating income (loss)
|
49,186 | 33,961 | 18,958 | 24,955 | 25,883 | 17,496 | 25,068 | 58,974 | (36,360 | ) | 99,209 | 118,818 | 94 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Nonoperating income (expense)
|
| | | | | | (18,183 | ) | (24,884 | ) | (22,322 | ) | (18,183 | ) | (24,884 | ) | (22,322 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
$49,186 | $33,961 | $18,958 | $24,955 | $25,883 | $17,496 | $6,885 | $34,090 | $(58,682 | ) | $81,026 | $93,934 | $(22,228 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Supplemental Data
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Plant, equipment and timberlands, net
|
$284,689 | $287,107 | $315,556 | $208,875 | $232,759 | $213,311 | $ | $ | $ | $493,564 | $519,866 | $528,867 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Capital expenditures
|
20,878 | 17,395 | 36,484 | 31,591 | 11,565 | 7,976 | | | | 52,469 | 28,960 | 44,460 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Depreciation, depletion and amortization
|
35,010 | 34,882 | 32,824 | 25,601 | 21,119 | 17,197 | | | | 60,611 | 56,001 | 50,021 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Results of individual business units are presented based on our
management accounting practices and management structure. There
is no comprehensive, authoritative body of guidance for
management accounting equivalent to accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America; therefore,
the financial results of individual business units are not
necessarily comparable with similar information for any other
company. The management accounting process uses assumptions and
allocations to measure performance of the business units.
Methodologies are refined from time to time as management
accounting practices are enhanced and businesses change. The
costs incurred by support areas not directly aligned with the
business unit are allocated primarily based on an estimated
utilization of support area services.
Management evaluates results of operations of the business units
before non-cash net pension income, charges related to the Fox
River environmental reserves, restructuring related charges,
unusual items, certain corporate level costs, effects of asset
dispositions and insurance recoveries because it believes this
is a more meaningful representation of the operating performance
of its core papermaking businesses, the profitability of
business units and the extent of cash flow generated from core
operations. Such amounts are presented under the caption
Other and Unallocated. This presentation is aligned
with the management and operating structure of our company. It
is also on this basis that the Companys performance is
evaluated internally and by the Companys Board of
Directors Our North America-based Specialty Papers business unit
focuses on producing papers for the following markets:
| Book publishing papers for the production of high quality hardbound books and other book publishing needs; | |
| Carbonless and forms papers for credit card receipts, multi-part forms, security papers and other end-user applications; | |
| Envelope and converting papers for the direct mail market, shopping bags, and other converting applications; and | |
| Engineered products for digital imaging, transfer, casting, release, postal, playing card and other niche specialty applications. |
Specialty Papers revenue composition by market consisted
of the following for the years indicated:
In thousands | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | ||||||||||||
Carbonless & forms
|
$ | 338,067 | $ | 345,785 | $ | 266,647 | |||||||||
Book publishing
|
201,040 | 185,343 | 166,605 | ||||||||||||
Envelope & converting
|
138,293 | 116,797 | 103,042 | ||||||||||||
Engineered products
|
149,372 | 136,785 | 137,007 | ||||||||||||
Other
|
7,127 | 17,583 | 20,359 | ||||||||||||
Total
|
$ | 833,899 | $ | 802,293 | $ | 693,660 | |||||||||
-46-
GLATFELTER
Table of Contents
Our Composite Fibers business unit, based in Gernsbach, Germany,
serves customers globally and focuses on higher-value-added
products in the following markets:
| Food & Beverage paper used for tea bags and coffee pods/pads and filters; | |
| Composite Laminates papers used in production of decorative laminates for furniture and flooring; | |
| Metallized products used in the labeling of beer bottles, innerliners, gift wrap, self-adhesive labels and other consumer products applications; and | |
| Technical Specialties is a diverse line of paper products used in batteries, medical masks and other highly engineered applications. |
Composite Fibers revenue composition by market consisted
of the following for the years indicated:
In thousands | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | ||||||||||||
Food & beverage
|
$ | 252,545 | $ | 218,961 | $ | 180,258 | |||||||||
Metallized
|
85,719 | 45,426 | 40,078 | ||||||||||||
Composite laminates
|
58,705 | 52,972 | 50,734 | ||||||||||||
Technical specialties and other
|
32,983 | 28,671 | 21,681 | ||||||||||||
Total
|
$ | 429,952 | $ | 346,030 | $ | 292,751 | |||||||||
We sell a significant portion of our specialty papers through
wholesale paper merchants. No individual customer accounted for
more than 10% of our consolidated net sales in 2008, 2007 or
2006.
Our net sales to external customers and location of net plant,
equipment and timberlands are summarized below. Net sales are
attributed to countries based upon origin of shipment.
2008 | 2007 | 2006 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Plant, |
Plant, |
Plant, |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Equipment and |
Equipment and |
Equipment and |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
In thousands | Net sales | Timberlands Net | Net sales | Timberlands Net | Net sales | Timberlands Net | |||||||||||||||||||||
United States
|
$ | 869,325 | $ | 284,689 | $ | 832,724 | $ | 287,107 | $ | 719,720 | $ | 315,556 | |||||||||||||||
Germany
|
216,011 | 131,304 | 190,796 | 133,505 | 173,267 | 128,290 | |||||||||||||||||||||
United Kingdom
|
134,212 | 53,054 | 87,054 | 74,000 | 60,115 | 63,061 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Other
|
44,302 | 24,517 | 37,749 | 25,254 | 33,309 | 21,960 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Total
|
$ | 1,263,850 | $ | 493,564 | $ | 1,148,323 | $ | 519,866 | $ | 986,411 | $ | 528,867 | |||||||||||||||
-47-
GLATFELTER
Table of Contents
22. | GUARANTOR FINANCIAL STATEMENTS |
Our
71/8%
Notes have been fully and unconditionally guaranteed, on a joint
and several basis, by certain of our 100%-owned domestic
subsidiaries, PHG Tea Leaves, Inc., Mollanvick, Inc., The
Glatfelter Pulp Wood Company, GLT International Finance, LLC,
Glatfelter Holdings, LLC and Glatfelter Holdings II, LLC.
The following presents our consolidating statements of income
and cash flow for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007
and 2006 and our consolidating balance sheets as of
December 31, 2008 and 2007. These financial statements
reflect P. H. Glatfelter Company (the parent), the
guarantor subsidiaries (on a combined basis), the non-guarantor
subsidiaries (on a combined basis) and elimination entries
necessary to combine such entities on a consolidated basis.
Condensed
Consolidating Statement of Income for the
year ended December 31, 2008
year ended December 31, 2008
Parent |
Non |
Adjustments/ |
||||||||||||||||||||
In thousands | Company | Guarantors | Guarantors | Eliminations | Consolidated | |||||||||||||||||
Net sales
|
$ | 833,900 | $ | 45,640 | $ | 429,950 | $ | (45,640 | ) | $ | 1,263,850 | |||||||||||
Energy sales net
|
9,364 | | | | 9,364 | |||||||||||||||||
Total revenues
|
843,264 | 45,640 | 429,950 | (45,640 | ) | 1,273,214 | ||||||||||||||||
Costs of products sold
|
729,425 | 44,448 | 367,005 | (45,446 | ) | 1,095,432 | ||||||||||||||||
Gross profit
|
113,839 | 1,192 | 62,945 | (194 | ) | 177,782 | ||||||||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
56,425 | 1,910 | 39,562 | | 97,897 | |||||||||||||||||
Reversal of shutdown and restructuring charges
|
(856 | ) | | | | (856 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Gains on dispositions of plant, equipment and timberlands, net
|
183 | (18,651 | ) | | | (18,468 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Operating income (loss)
|
58,087 | 17,933 | 23,383 | (194 | ) | 99,209 | ||||||||||||||||
Non-operating income (expense)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest expense
|
(19,940 | ) | (14 | ) | (3,206 | ) | | (23,160 | ) | |||||||||||||
Other income (expense) net
|
36,376 | 11,130 | (4,383 | ) | (38,146 | ) | 4,977 | |||||||||||||||
Total other income (expense)
|
16,436 | 11,116 | (7,589 | ) | (38,146 | ) | (18,183 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
74,523 | 29,049 | 15,794 | (38,340 | ) | 81,026 | ||||||||||||||||
Income tax provision (benefit)
|
16,635 | 11,486 | 4,211 | (9,194 | ) | 23,138 | ||||||||||||||||
Net income (loss)
|
$ | 57,888 | $ | 17,563 | $ | 11,583 | $ | (29,146 | ) | $ | 57,888 | |||||||||||
Condensed
Consolidating Statement of Income for the
year ended December 31, 2007
year ended December 31, 2007
Parent |
Non |
Adjustments/ |
||||||||||||||||||||
In thousands | Company | Guarantors | Guarantors | Eliminations | Consolidated | |||||||||||||||||
Net sales
|
$ | 802,293 | $ | 42,801 | $ | 346,030 | $ | (42,801 | ) | $ | 1,148,323 | |||||||||||
Energy sales net
|
9,445 | | | | 9,445 | |||||||||||||||||
Total revenues
|
811,738 | 42,801 | 346,030 | (42,801 | ) | 1,157,768 | ||||||||||||||||
Costs of products sold
|
716,015 | 40,181 | 287,931 | (42,671 | ) | 1,001,456 | ||||||||||||||||
Gross profit
|
95,723 | 2,620 | 58,099 | (130 | ) | 156,312 | ||||||||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
80,112 | 1,845 | 34,187 | | 116,144 | |||||||||||||||||
(Reversal of) Shutdown and restructuring charges
|
201 | | (166 | ) | | 35 | ||||||||||||||||
Gains on dispositions of plant, equipment and timberlands, net
|
76 | (78,761 | ) | | | (78,685 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Operating income
|
15,334 | 79,536 | 24,078 | (130 | ) | 118,818 | ||||||||||||||||
Non-operating income (expense)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest expense
|
(26,980 | ) | (3 | ) | (2,039 | ) | | (29,022 | ) | |||||||||||||
Other income (expense) net
|
75,806 | 15,910 | (5,939 | ) | (81,639 | ) | 4,138 | |||||||||||||||
Total other income (expense)
|
48,826 | 15,907 | (7,978 | ) | (81,639 | ) | (24,884 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
64,160 | 95,443 | 16,100 | (81,769 | ) | 93,934 | ||||||||||||||||
Income tax provision (benefit)
|
688 | 35,992 | 555 | (6,773 | ) | 30,462 | ||||||||||||||||
Net income (loss)
|
$ | 63,472 | $ | 59,451 | $ | 15,545 | $ | (74,996 | ) | $ | 63,472 | |||||||||||
-48-
GLATFELTER
Table of Contents
Condensed
Consolidating Statement of Income for the
year ended December 31, 2006
year ended December 31, 2006
Parent |
Non |
Adjustments/ |
||||||||||||||||||||
In thousands | Company | Guarantors | Guarantors | Eliminations | Consolidated | |||||||||||||||||
Net sales
|
$693,661 | $36,432 | $292,750 | $(36,432 | ) | $986,411 | ||||||||||||||||
Energy sales net
|
10,726 | | | | 10,726 | |||||||||||||||||
Total revenues
|
704,387 | 36,432 | 292,750 | (36,432 | ) | 997,137 | ||||||||||||||||
Costs of products sold
|
647,877 | 33,340 | 247,041 | (36,415 | ) | 891,843 | ||||||||||||||||
Gross profit
|
56,510 | 3,092 | 45,709 | (17 | ) | 105,294 | ||||||||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
60,119 | 2,501 | 29,861 | | 92,481 | |||||||||||||||||
Shutdown and restructuring charges
|
29,073 | | 1,245 | | 30,318 | |||||||||||||||||
Gains on dispositions of plant, equipment and timberlands, net
|
(1,761 | ) | (15,960 | ) | 327 | | (17,394 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Gains from insurance recoveries
|
(205 | ) | | | | (205 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Operating income
|
(30,716 | ) | 16,551 | 14,276 | (17 | ) | 94 | |||||||||||||||
Non-operating income (expense)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest expense
|
(20,942 | ) | (463 | ) | (3,048 | ) | | (24,453 | ) | |||||||||||||
Other income (expense) net
|
22,643 | 14,767 | (5,477 | ) | (29,802 | ) | 2,131 | |||||||||||||||
Total other income (expense)
|
1,701 | 14,304 | (8,525 | ) | (29,802 | ) | (22,322 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
(29,015 | ) | 30,855 | 5,751 | (29,819 | ) | (22,228 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Income tax provision (benefit)
|
(16,779 | ) | 11,062 | 1,908 | (6,183 | ) | (9,992 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Net income (loss)
|
$(12,236 | ) | $19,793 | $3,843 | $(23,636 | ) | $(12,236 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Condensed
Consolidating Balance Sheet as of December 31,
2008
Parent |
Non |
Adjustments/ |
||||||||||||||||||||
In thousands | Company | Guarantors | Guarantors | Eliminations | Consolidated | |||||||||||||||||
Assets
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Current assets
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents
|
$8,860 | $756 | $22,618 | $ | $32,234 | |||||||||||||||||
Other current assets
|
266,899 | 256,834 | 88,288 | (252,436 | ) | 359,585 | ||||||||||||||||
Plant, equipment and timberlands net
|
277,215 | 7,470 | 208,879 | | 493,564 | |||||||||||||||||
Other assets
|
510,144 | 175,927 | (29,767 | ) | (484,378 | ) | 171,926 | |||||||||||||||
Total assets
|
$1,063,118 | $440,987 | $290,018 | $(736,814 | ) | $1,057,309 | ||||||||||||||||
Liabilities and Shareholders Equity
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Current liabilities
|
$336,182 | $17,072 | $85,668 | $(248,820 | ) | $190,102 | ||||||||||||||||
Long-term debt
|
222,965 | | 70,695 | | 293,660 | |||||||||||||||||
Deferred income taxes
|
53,976 | 24,615 | 26,272 | (14,705 | ) | 90,158 | ||||||||||||||||
Other long-term liabilities
|
107,288 | 13,838 | 8,941 | 10,615 | 140,682 | |||||||||||||||||
Total liabilities
|
720,411 | 55,525 | 191,576 | (252,910 | ) | 714,602 | ||||||||||||||||
Shareholders equity
|
342,707 | 385,462 | 98,442 | (483,904 | ) | 342,707 | ||||||||||||||||
Total liabilities and shareholders equity
|
$1,063,118 | $440,987 | $290,018 | $(736,814 | ) | $1,057,309 | ||||||||||||||||
-49-
GLATFELTER
Table of Contents
Condensed
Consolidating Balance Sheet as of December 31,
2007
Parent |
Non |
Adjustments/ |
||||||||||||||||||||
In thousands | Company | Guarantors | Guarantors | Eliminations | Consolidated | |||||||||||||||||
Assets
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Current assets
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents
|
$6,693 | $162 | $22,978 | $ | $29,833 | |||||||||||||||||
Other current assets
|
257,804 | 277,958 | 37,008 | (229,191 | ) | 343,579 | ||||||||||||||||
Plant, equipment and timberlands net
|
279,511 | 7,591 | 232,764 | | 519,866 | |||||||||||||||||
Other assets
|
749,913 | 212,513 | (78,513 | ) | (490,124 | ) | 393,789 | |||||||||||||||
Total assets
|
$1,293,921 | $498,224 | $214,237 | $(719,315 | ) | $1,287,067 | ||||||||||||||||
Liabilities and Shareholders Equity
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Current liabilities
|
$319,516 | $39,285 | $64,423 | $(225,668 | ) | $197,556 | ||||||||||||||||
Long-term debt
|
267,041 | | 34,000 | | 301,041 | |||||||||||||||||
Deferred income taxes
|
138,615 | 33,557 | 32,236 | (15,252 | ) | 189,156 | ||||||||||||||||
Other long-term liabilities
|
92,681 | 14,310 | 8,489 | 7,766 | 123,246 | |||||||||||||||||
Total liabilities
|
817,853 | 87,152 | 139,148 | (233,154 | ) | 810,999 | ||||||||||||||||
Shareholders equity
|
476,068 | 411,072 | 75,089 | (486,161 | ) | 476,068 | ||||||||||||||||
Total liabilities and shareholders equity
|
$1,293,921 | $498,224 | $214,237 | $(719,315 | ) | $1,287,067 | ||||||||||||||||
Condensed
Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows for the year
ended December 31, 2008
ended December 31, 2008
Parent |
Non |
Adjustments/ |
||||||||||||||||||||
In thousands | Company | Guarantors | Guarantors | Eliminations | Consolidated | |||||||||||||||||
Net cash provided (used) by
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating activities
|
$15,641 | $26,929 | $34,455 | $(23,600 | ) | $53,425 | ||||||||||||||||
Investing activities
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Purchase of plant, equipment and timberlands
|
(19,998 | ) | (880 | ) | (31,591 | ) | | (52,469 | ) | |||||||||||||
Proceeds from disposal plant, equipment and timberlands
|
19,279 | | | | 19,279 | |||||||||||||||||
Repayments from (advances of) intercompany loans, net
|
4,593 | (19,678 | ) | (17,502 | ) | 32,587 | | |||||||||||||||
Return (contributions) of intercompany capital, net
|
| 24,997 | | (24,997 | ) | | ||||||||||||||||
Total investing activities
|
(719 | ) | (880 | ) | (31,591 | ) | | (33,190 | ) | |||||||||||||
Financing activities
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Net (repayments of) proceeds from indebtedness
|
(39,196 | ) | | 41,621 | | 2,425 | ||||||||||||||||
Payment of dividends to shareholders
|
(16,469 | ) | | | | (16,469 | ) | |||||||||||||||
(Repayments) borrowings of intercompany loans, net
|
39,280 | (7,174 | ) | 481 | (32,587 | ) | | |||||||||||||||
Return of intercompany capital, net
|
| | (24,997 | ) | 24,997 | |||||||||||||||||
Payment of intercompany dividends
|
| (23,600 | ) | | 23,600 | |||||||||||||||||
Proceeds from stock options exercised and other
|
1,165 | | | | 1,165 | |||||||||||||||||
Total financing activities
|
(15,220 | ) | (30,774 | ) | 17,105 | 16,010 | (12,879 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Effect of exchange rate on cash
|
(2,128 | ) | | (2,827 | ) | | (4,955 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Net increase (decrease) in cash
|
2,167 | 594 | (360 | ) | | 2,401 | ||||||||||||||||
Cash at the beginning of period
|
6,693 | 162 | 22,978 | 29,833 | ||||||||||||||||||
Cash at the end of period
|
$8,860 | $756 | $22,618 | $ | $32,234 | |||||||||||||||||
-50-
GLATFELTER
Table of Contents
Condensed
Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows for the year
ended December 31, 2007
ended December 31, 2007
Parent |
Non |
Adjustments/ |
||||||||||||||||||||
In thousands | Company | Guarantors | Guarantors | Eliminations | Consolidated | |||||||||||||||||
Net cash provided (used) by
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating activities
|
$92,366 | $(40,334 | ) | $48,300 | $ | $100,332 | ||||||||||||||||
Investing activities
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Purchase of plant, equipment and timberlands
|
(16,334 | ) | (1,091 | ) | (11,535 | ) | | (28,960 | ) | |||||||||||||
Proceeds from disposal plant, equipment and timberlands
|
199 | 41,041 | 376 | | 41,616 | |||||||||||||||||
Acquisitions, net of cash acquired
|
| | (7,923 | ) | | (7,923 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Total investing activities
|
(16,135 | ) | 39,950 | (19,082 | ) | | 4,733 | |||||||||||||||
Financing activities
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Net (repayments of) proceeds from indebtedness
|
(71,570 | ) | | (19,002 | ) | | (90,572 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Payment of dividends
|
(16,350 | ) | | | | (16,350 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Proceeds from stock options exercised and other
|
7,551 | | | | 7,551 | |||||||||||||||||
Total financing activities
|
(80,369 | ) | | (19,002 | ) | | (99,371 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Effect of exchange rate on cash
|
604 | | 1,550 | | 2,154 | |||||||||||||||||
Net increase (decrease) in cash
|
(3,534 | ) | (384 | ) | 11,766 | | 7,848 | |||||||||||||||
Cash at the beginning of period
|
10,227 | 546 | 11,212 | | 21,985 | |||||||||||||||||
Cash at the end of period
|
$6,693 | $162 | $22,978 | $ | $29,833 | |||||||||||||||||
Condensed
Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows for the year
ended December 31, 2006
ended December 31, 2006
Parent |
Non |
Adjustments/ |
||||||||||||||||||||
In thousands | Company | Guarantors | Guarantors | Eliminations | Consolidated | |||||||||||||||||
Net cash provided (used) by
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating activities
|
$(75,468 | ) | $23,795 | $13,860 | $9,386 | $(28,427 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Investing activities
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Purchase of plant, equipment and timberlands
|
(35,527 | ) | (957 | ) | (7,976 | ) | | (44,460 | ) | |||||||||||||
Proceeds from disposal plant, equipment and timberlands
|
4,632 | 16,436 | 3 | | 21,071 | |||||||||||||||||
Acquisitions
|
(89,217 | ) | (69,225 | ) | 0 | | (158,442 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Total investing activities
|
(120,112 | ) | (53,746 | ) | (7,973 | ) | | (181,831 | ) | |||||||||||||
Financing activities
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Net (repayments of) proceeds from indebtedness
|
199,016 | | (8,476 | ) | (9,419 | ) | 181,121 | |||||||||||||||
Payment of dividends
|
(16,023 | ) | | | (16,023 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Proceeds from stock options exercised and other
|
8,290 | | | | 8,290 | |||||||||||||||||
Total financing activities
|
191,283 | | (8,476 | ) | (9,419 | ) | 173,388 | |||||||||||||||
Effect of exchange rate on cash
|
| 2 | 1,411 | 0 | 1,413 | |||||||||||||||||
Net increase (decrease) in cash
|
(4,297 | ) | (29,949 | ) | (1,178 | ) | (33 | ) | (35,457 | ) | ||||||||||||
Cash at the beginning of period
|
14,524 | 30,495 | 12,390 | 33 | 57,442 | |||||||||||||||||
Cash at the end of period
|
$10,227 | $546 | $11,212 | $ | $21,985 | |||||||||||||||||
-51-
GLATFELTER
Table of Contents
23. | QUARTERLY RESULTS (UNAUDITED) |
In thousands, except per share
Diluted |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Earnings (loss) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net sales | Gross Profit | Net Income (loss) | Per Share | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | 2008 | 2007 | 2008 | 2007 | 2008 | 2007 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
First
|
$ | 305,499 | $ | 280,989 | $ | 44,258 | $ | 36,709 | $ | 19,675 | $3,253 | $ | 0.43 | $ | 0.07 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Second
|
320,224 | 288,091 | 32,398 | 28,800 | 3,156 | 1,998 | 0.07 | 0.04 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Third
|
339,822 | 291,859 | 57,172 | 46,880 | 21,662 | 7,812 | 0.47 | 0.17 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fourth
|
298,305 | 287,384 | 43,954 | 43,923 | 13,395 | 50,409 | 0.29 | 1.12 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The information set forth above includes the following, on an
after-tax basis:
Reversal of (charges for) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gains on Sales of Plant, |
Shutdown and |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Equipment and Timberlands | Acquisition Integration Costs | Restructuring Costs | Environmental Reserve | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
In thousands | 2008 | 2007 | 2008 | 2007 | 2008 | 2007 | 2008 | 2007 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
First
|
$ | 8,662 | $ | 1,914 | $ | (411 | ) | $ | (406 | ) | $ | | $(147 | ) | $ | | $ | 3,695 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Second
|
| 3,486 | (177 | ) | (704 | ) | 532 | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Third
|
2,371 | 1,415 | (240 | ) | (322 | ) | | | | 12,286 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fourth
|
(9 | ) | 37,237 | (61 | ) | (97 | ) | 10 | (85 | ) | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ITEM 9A | CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES |
Disclosure
Controls and Procedures
Our chief executive officer and our chief financial officer,
after evaluating the effectiveness of our disclosure controls
and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e)
and
15d-15(e)),
as of December 31, 2008, have concluded that, as of the
evaluation date, our disclosure controls and procedures were
effective.
Internal Control
Over Financial Reporting.
Managements report on the Companys internal control
over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(f)
and
15d-15(f))
and the related report of our independent registered public
accounting firm are included in Item 8
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.
Changes in
Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There were no changes in our internal control over financial
reporting during the three months ended December 31, 2008,
that have materially affected or are reasonably likely to
materially affect our internal control over financial reporting.
In the course of completing our evaluation of internal control
over financial reporting we implemented certain changes and
enhancements to our controls.
PART III
ITEM 10 | DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE |
Directors The information with respect
to directors required under this Item is incorporated herein by
reference to our Proxy Statement, to be dated on or about
March 25, 2009. Our board of directors has determined that,
based on the relevant experience of the members of the Audit
Committee, the members are audit committee financial experts
as this term is set forth in the applicable regulations of
the SEC.
Executive Officers of the
Registrant The information with respect to
the executive officers required under this Item is set forth in
Part I of this report.
We have adopted a Code of Business Ethics for the CEO and Senior
Financial Officers in compliance with applicable rules of the
Securities and Exchange Commission that applies to our chief
executive officer, chief financial officer and our principal
accounting officer or controller, or persons performing similar
functions. A copy of the Code of Ethical Business Conduct is
filed as an exhibit to this Annual Report on
Form 10-K
and is available on our website, free of charge, at
www.glatfelter.com.
ITEM 11 | EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION |
The information required under this Item is incorporated herein
by reference to our Proxy Statement, to be dated on or about
March 25, 2009.
ITEM 12 | SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT |
The information required under this Item is incorporated herein
by reference to our Proxy Statement, to be dated on or about
March 25, 2009.
ITEM 13 | CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE |
The information required under this Item is incorporated herein
by reference to our Proxy Statement, to be dated on or about
March 25, 2009.
-52-
GLATFELTER
Table of Contents
ITEM 14 | PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES |
The information required under this Item is incorporated herein
by reference to our Proxy Statement, to be dated on or about
March 25, 2009.
Our Chief Executive Officer has certified to the New York Stock
Exchange that he is not aware of any violations by the Company
of the NYSE corporate governance listing standards.
PART IV
ITEM 15 | EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES. |
(a)
|
1. | Our Consolidated Financial Statements as follows are included in Part II, Item 8: | ||||||
i. | Consolidated Statements of Income for the Years Ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 | |||||||
ii. | Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2008 and 2007 | |||||||
iii. | Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 | |||||||
iv. | Consolidated Statements of Shareholders Equity for the Years Ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 | |||||||
v. | Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for the Years Ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 | |||||||
2. | Financial Statement Schedules (Consolidated) are included in Part IV: | |||||||
i. | Schedule II Valuation and Qualifying Accounts For Each of the Three Years in the Period Ended December 31, 2008 |
(b) | Exhibit Index |
Exhibit Number | Description of Documents | Incorporated by Reference to | ||||||||||
Exhibit | Filing | |||||||||||
2 | (a) |
Asset Purchase Agreement, dated February 21, 2006, among
NewPage Corporation, Chillicothe Paper Inc. and P. H. Glatfelter
Company
|
2.1 |
February 21, 2006 Form 8-K |
||||||||
(b) |
Agreement for Sale of Assets (Lydney), dated March 8, 2006,
by and among J R Crompton Limited, Nicholas James Dargan and
Willian Kenneth Dawson, as administrators and Glatfelter-UK
Limited and the Company
|
10 |
March 31, 2006 Form 10-Q |
|||||||||
(c) |
Agreement, dated as of November 30, 2007, between
Metallised Products Limited (MPL) and Glatfelter
Lydney Limited, a wholly-owned indirect subsidiary of P. H.
Glatfelter Company to acquire MPL, filed herewith. (the
schedules have been omitted pursuant to Item 601(b)(2) of
Regulation S-K
and will be provided to the Securities and Exchange Commission
upon request)
|
|||||||||||
3 | (a) |
Articles of Incorporation, as amended through December 20,
2007 (restated for the purpose of filing on EDGAR)
|
3(b) | 2007 Form 10-K | ||||||||
(b) |
By-Laws as amended through February 18, 2009, filed herewith
|
|||||||||||
4 | (a) |
Indenture, dated as of April 28, 2006, by and between the
Company and SunTrust Bank, as trustee relating to
71/8
Notes due 2016
|
4.1 |
May 3, 2006 Form 8-K |
||||||||
(b) |
First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of September 22,
2006, among Glatfelter Holdings, LLC, Glatfelter Holdings II,
LLC, the Existing Subsidiary Guarantors named therein and
SunTrust Bank relating to
71/8
Notes due 2016
|
4.3 |
September 22, 2006 Form S-4/A |
|||||||||
10 | (a) |
P. H. Glatfelter Company Management Incentive Plan, effective
January 1, 1982, as amended and restated effective
January 1, 1994**
|
10(a) | 2000 Form 10-K | ||||||||
(b) |
P. H. Glatfelter Company 2005 Management Incentive Plan, adopted
as of April 27, 2005
|
10.4 |
April 27, 2005 Form 8-K |
|||||||||
(c) |
P. H. Glatfelter Company Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan,
as amended and restated effective April 23, 1998 and
further amended December 20, 2000**
|
10(c) | 2000 Form 10-K | |||||||||
(d) |
Description of Executive Salary Continuation Plan**
|
10(g) | 1990 Form 10-K | |||||||||
(e) |
P. H. Glatfelter Company Supplemental Management Pension Plan,
effective as of April 23, 1998**
|
10(f) | 1998 Form 10-K | |||||||||
(f) |
P. H. Glatfelter Company 1992 Key Employee Long-Term Incentive
Plan, as amended December 20, 2000**
|
10(g) | 2000 Form 10-K | |||||||||
(g) |
P. H. Glatfelter Company 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan, adopted
as of April 27, 2005
|
10.1 |
April 27, 2005 Form 8-K |
|||||||||
(g) | (A) |
Form of Top Management Restricted Stock Unit Award Certificate**
|
10.2 |
April 27, 2005 Form 8-K |
||||||||
(g) | (B) |
Form of Non-Employee Director Restricted Stock Unit Award
Certificate**
|
10.3 |
April 27, 2005 Form 8-K |
||||||||
(h) |
P. H. Glatfelter Company Deferred Compensation Plan for
Directors, effective as of April 22, 1998**
|
10(h) | 1998 Form 10-K | |||||||||
(i) |
Change in Control Employment Agreement by and between P. H.
Glatfelter Company and George H. Glatfelter II, dated as of
December 8, 2008, filed herewith**
|
|||||||||||
(j) |
Form of Change in Control Employment Agreement by and between P.
H. Glatfelter Company and certain employees, dated as of
December 8, 2008, filed herewith**
|
-53-
GLATFELTER
Table of Contents
Exhibit Number | Description of Documents | Incorporated by Reference to | ||||||||||
Exhibit | Filing | |||||||||||
(j) | (A) |
Schedule of Change in Control Employment Agreements, filed
herewith**
|
||||||||||
(k) |
Agreement between the State of Wisconsin and Certain Companies
Concerning the Fox River, dated as of January 31, 1997,
among P. H. Glatfelter Company, Fort Howard Corporation,
NCR Corporation, Appleton Papers Inc., Riverside Paper
Corporation, U.S. Paper Mills, Wisconsin Tissue Mills Inc. and
the State of Wisconsin
|
10(i) | 1996 Form 10-K | |||||||||
(l) |
Credit Agreement, dated as of April 3, 2006, by and among
the Company, certain of the Companys subsidiaries as
guarantors, the banks party thereto, PNC Bank, National
Association, as agent for the banks under the Credit Agreement,
PNC Capital Markets LLC and Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC,
as joint arrangers and bookrunners, and Credit Suisse Securities
(USA) LLC, as syndication agent
|
10.1 |
April 7, 2006 Form 8-K |
|||||||||
(l) | (A) |
First Amendment to Credit Agreement among the Company, certain
of the Companys subsidiaries, certain lenders party
thereto and PNC Bank, National Association, in its capacity as
agent for such lenders, dated April 25, 2006
|
10.1 |
June 30, 2007 Form 10-Q |
||||||||
(l) | (B) |
Second Amendment to Credit Agreement among the Company, certain
of the Companys subsidiaries, certain lenders party
thereto and PNC Bank, National Association, in its capacity as
agent for such lenders, dated December 22, 2006
|
10.2 |
June 30, 2007 Form 10-Q |
||||||||
(l) | (C) |
Third Amendment to Credit Agreement among the Company, certain
of the Companys subsidiaries, certain lenders party
thereto and PNC Bank, National Association, in its capacity as
agent for such lenders, dated June 8, 2007
|
10.3 |
June 30, 2007 Form 10-Q |
||||||||
(m) |
Contract for the Purchase and Bargain Sale of Property, dated as
of December 16, 2002, by and among Glatfelter Pulp Wood
Company (a wholly owned subsidiary of the Registrant), the
Conservation Fund and Fidelity National Title Insurance
Company
|
10(o) | 2002 Form 10-K | |||||||||
(n) |
Term Loan Agreement, dated as of March 21, 2003, among GPW
Timberlands, LLC (a wholly owned subsidiary of the Registrant)
and SunTrust Bank, as Administrative Agent
|
10.3 |
March 31, 2003 Form 10-Q |
|||||||||
(n) | (A) |
First Amendment to Term Loan Agreement dated January 31,
2008, by and during GPW Timberlands, LLC, P.H. Glatfelter
Company and Sun Trust Bank, an administrative agent
|
10(n)(A) | 2007 Form 10-K | ||||||||
(o) |
Consent Decree for Remedial Design and Remedial Action at
Operable Unit 1 of the Lower Fox River and Green Bay site by and
among the United States of America and the State of
Wisconsin v. P. H. Glatfelter Company and WTMI Company
(f/k/a Wisconsin Tissue Mills, Inc.)
|
10.2 |
October 1, 2003 Form 8-K/A No. 1 |
|||||||||
(o) | (A) |
Agreed Supplement to Consent Decree between United States of
America and the State of Wisconsin vs. P.H. Glatfelter Company
and WTM I Company (f/k/a Wisconsin Tissue Mills Inc.)
|
10(o) | 2007 Form 10-K | ||||||||
(o) | (B) |
Second Agreed Supplement to Consent Decree between United States
of America and the State of Wisconsin vs. P.H. Glatfelter
Company and WTM I Company (f/k/a Wisconsin Tissue Mills Inc.)
|
10.1 |
Nov 15, 2008 Form 8-K |
||||||||
(p) |
Administrative Order for Remedial Action dated November 13,
2008; issued by the United States Environmental Protection Agency
|
10.2 |
Nov 15, 2008 Form 8-K |
|||||||||
(q) |
Amended Consent Decree for Remedial Design and Remedial Action
at Operable Unit 1 of the Lower Fox River and Green Bay Site by
and among the United States of America and the State of
Wisconsin v. P. H. Glatfelter and WTM I Company (f/k/a
Wisconsin Tissue Mills Inc.), certain Appendices have been
intentionally omitted, copies of which can be obtained free of
charge from the Registrant)
|
10.1 |
June 30, 2008 Form 8-K |
|||||||||
(r) |
Compensatory Arrangements with Certain Executive Officers, filed
herewith**
|
|||||||||||
(s) |
Summary of Non-Employee Director Compensation (effective
January 1, 2007), filed herewith**
|
|||||||||||
(t) |
Service Agreement, commencing on August 1, 2006, between
the Registrant (through a wholly owned subsidiary) and Martin
Rapp**
|
10(r) | 2006 Form 10-K | |||||||||
(u) |
Retirement Pension Contract, dated October 31, 2007,
between Registrant (through a wholly owned subsidiary) and
Martin Rapp**
|
10(t) | 2007 Form 10-K | |||||||||
(v) |
Form of Stock-Only Stock Appreciation Right Award Certificate**
|
10(s) | 2006 Form 10-K | |||||||||
(w) |
Form of 2008 Top Management Restricted Stock Unit Award
Certificate**
|
10(t) | 2006 Form 10-K | |||||||||
(x) |
Separation Agreement and General Release entered into between
Jeffrey J. Norton and P. H. Glatfelter Company dated as of
October 25, 2008
|
10.1 |
Sept. 30, 2008 Form 10-Q |
|||||||||
(y) |
Timberland Purchase & Sale Agreement
Virginia Timberlands, entered into by and among Glawson
Investments Corp., GIC Investments LLC and Glatfelter Pulp Wood
Company, dated and effective as of August 8, 2007
|
10.1 |
Sept. 30, 2007 Form 10-Q |
|||||||||
(z) |
Term Loan Agreement dated January 15, 2008, among GPW
Virginia Timberlands LLC, certain lenders party thereto and
SunTrust Bank, in its capacity as agent for such lenders
|
10(x) | 2007 Form 10-K | |||||||||
(aa) |
Contract for Sale for Sale of Real Estate between Glatfelter
Pulp Wood Company, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, and
George H. Glatfelter II and Beverly G. Glatfelter, dated
May 8, 2008
|
10.2 |
June 30, 2008 Form 10Q |
|||||||||
14 |
Code of Business Ethics for the CEO and Senior Financial
Officers of Glatfelter
|
14 | 2003 Form 10-K | |||||||||
21 |
Subsidiaries of the Registrant, filed herewith
|
-54-
GLATFELTER
Table of Contents
Exhibit Number | Description of Documents | Incorporated by Reference to | ||||||||||
Exhibit | Filing | |||||||||||
23 |
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm, filed
herewith
|
|||||||||||
31 | .1 |
Certification of George H. Glatfelter II, Chairman and Chief
Executive Officer of Glatfelter, pursuant to
Section 302(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002,
filed herewith
|
||||||||||
31 | .2 |
Certification of John P. Jacunski, Senior Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer of Glatfelter, pursuant to
Section 302(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002,
filed herewith
|
||||||||||
32 | .1 |
Certification of George H. Glatfelter II, Chairman and Chief
Executive Officer of Glatfelter, pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, filed herewith
|
||||||||||
32 | .2 |
Certification of John P. Jacunski, Senior Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer of Glatfelter, pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, filed herewith
|
* | Confidential treatment has been received for certain portions thereof pursuant to a confidential treatment request filed with the Commission on August 7, 2007. Such provisions have been filed separately with the Commission. | |
** | Management contract or compensatory plan |
-55-
GLATFELTER
Table of Contents
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned,
thereunto duly authorized.
P. H. GLATFELTER COMPANY
(Registrant)
March 12, 2009
By |
/s/ George
H. Glatfelter II
|
George H. Glatfelter II
Chairman and
Chief Executive Officer
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons
on behalf of the Registrant in the capacities and on the dates
indicated:
Date | Signature | Capacity | ||
March 12, 2009
|
/s/ George
H. Glatfelter II George H. Glatfelter II Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |
Principal Executive Officer and Director | ||
March 12, 2009
|
/s/ John
P. Jacunski John P. Jacunski Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
Principal Financial Officer | ||
March 12, 2009
|
/s/ David
C. Elder David C. Elder Vice President and Corporate Controller |
Controller | ||
March 12, 2009
|
/s/ Kathleen
A. Dahlberg Kathleen A. Dahlberg |
Director | ||
March 12, 2009
|
/s/ Nicholas
DeBenedictis Nicholas DeBenedictis |
Director | ||
March 12, 2009
|
/s/ Richard
C. Ill Richard C. Ill |
Director | ||
March 12, 2009
|
/s/ J.
Robert Hall J. Robert Hall |
Director | ||
March 12, 2009
|
/s/ Ronald
J. Naples Ronald J. Naples |
Director | ||
March 12, 2009
|
/s/ Richard
L. Smoot Richard L. Smoot |
Director | ||
March 12, 2009
|
/s/ Lee
C. Stewart Lee C. Stewart |
Director |
-56-
GLATFELTER
Table of Contents
CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 (a) OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002
I, George H. Glatfelter II, certify that:
1. | I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 of P. H. Glatfelter Company (Glatfelter); |
2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; |
3. | Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report. |
4. | Glatfelters other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for Glatfelter and have: |
(a) | Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to Glatfelter, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; | |
(b) | Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; |
(c) | Evaluated the effectiveness of Glatfelters disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and |
(d) | Disclosed in this report any change in Glatfelters internal control over financial reporting that occurred during Glatfelters most recent fiscal quarter (the fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, Glatfelters internal control over financial reporting; and |
5. | Glatfelters other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to Glatfelters auditors and the audit committee of the Glatfelters board of directors: |
(a) | All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect Glatfelters ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and | |
(b) | Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in Glatfelters internal control over financial reporting. |
Date: March 12, 2009
|
By:
/s/ George
H. Glatfelter II George
H. Glatfelter II
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |
-57-
GLATFELTER
Table of Contents
CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 (a) OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002
I, John P. Jacunski, certify that:
1. | I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 of P. H. Glatfelter Company (Glatfelter); |
2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; |
3. | Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; |
4. | Glatfelters other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for Glatfelter and have: |
(a) | Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to Glatfelter, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; | |
(b) | Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; |
(c) | Evaluated the effectiveness of Glatfelters disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and |
(d) | Disclosed in this report any change in Glatfelters internal control over financial reporting that occurred during Glatfelters most recent fiscal quarter (the fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, Glatfelters internal control over financial reporting; and |
5. | Glatfelters other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to Glatfelters auditors and the audit committee of the Glatfelters board of directors: |
(a) | All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect Glatfelters ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and | |
(b) | Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in Glatfelters internal control over financial reporting. |
Date: March 12, 2009
|
By: /s/ John
P. JacunskiJohn P. Jacunski Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
-58-
GLATFELTER
Table of Contents
Schedule II
P. H.
GLATFELTER COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
SUPPLEMENTAL FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULE
SUPPLEMENTAL FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULE
For each of the
three years ended December 31, 2008
Valuation and Qualifying Accounts
Valuation and Qualifying Accounts
Allowance for | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
In thousands | Doubtful Accounts | Sales Discounts and Deductions | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance, beginning of year
|
$ | 3,117 | $3,613 | $931 | $4,345 | $2,585 | $2,045 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Provision(a)
|
(36 | ) | 781 | 2,771 | 6,620 | 6,723 | 3,153 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Write-offs, recoveries and discounts allowed
|
(296 | ) | (1,319 | ) | (137 | ) | (6,045 | ) | (5,195 | ) | (2,795 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Other(b)
|
(152 | ) | 42 | 48 | (1,551 | ) | 232 | 182 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Balance, end of year
|
$ | 2,633 | $3,117 | $3,613 | $3,369 | $4,345 | $2,585 | |||||||||||||||||||||
The provision for doubtful accounts is included in selling,
general and administrative expense and the provision for sales
discounts and deductions is deducted from sales. The related
allowances are deducted from accounts receivable.
(a) | The amount in 2006 includes $1.8 million of doubtful account allowances acquired in connection with the Chillicothe and Lydney acquisitions. | |
(b) | Relates primarily to changes in currency exchange rates and, in 2008 a change in presentation of certain customer rebates. |
-59-
GLATFELTER