e10vq
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.
20549
Form 10-Q
|
|
|
(Mark One)
|
|
|
|
þ
|
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For the quarterly period ended
September 30, 2007
|
or
|
o
|
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For the transition period
from to
|
Commission File
No. 0-24993
LAKES ENTERTAINMENT,
INC.
(Exact name of registrant as
specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Minnesota
(State or other
jurisdiction
of incorporation or organization)
|
|
41-1913991
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
|
|
|
|
130 Cheshire Lane, Suite 101
Minnetonka, Minnesota
(Address of principal
executive offices)
|
|
55305
(Zip
Code)
|
(952) 449-9092
(Registrants telephone
number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has
filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has
been subject to such filing requirements for the past
90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated
filer. See definition of accelerated filer and large
accelerated filer in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large Accelerated
Filer o Accelerated
Filer þ
Non Accelerated
Filer o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company
(as defined in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange
Act). Yes o No þ
As of November 5, 2007, there were 24,515,675 shares
of Common Stock, $0.01 par value per share, outstanding.
LAKES
ENTERTAINMENT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
INDEX
2
LAKES
ENTERTAINMENT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
7,921
|
|
|
$
|
9,759
|
|
(balances include $4.5 million and $8.4 million of
WPT Enterprises, Inc.)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted cash
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,738
|
|
Investments in marketable securities
|
|
|
51,572
|
|
|
|
52,901
|
|
(balances include $21.4 million and $24.3 million of
WPT Enterprises, Inc.)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
4,453
|
|
|
|
2,963
|
|
Notes receivable current
|
|
|
3,029
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
3,087
|
|
|
|
2,706
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
70,062
|
|
|
|
81,067
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
|
16,857
|
|
|
|
17,460
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term assets related to Indian casino projects:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes receivable from Indian tribes
|
|
|
79,278
|
|
|
|
164,308
|
|
Land held for development
|
|
|
7,597
|
|
|
|
16,790
|
|
Intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization of
$1.1 million at September 30, 2007
|
|
|
66,942
|
|
|
|
54,279
|
|
Other
|
|
|
5,615
|
|
|
|
8,450
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term assets related to Indian casino projects
|
|
|
159,432
|
|
|
|
243,827
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments in marketable securities
|
|
|
9,004
|
|
|
|
6,962
|
|
Investments
|
|
|
2,923
|
|
|
|
2,923
|
|
Deferred tax asset
|
|
|
6,333
|
|
|
|
6,248
|
|
Debt issuance costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,972
|
|
Other long-term assets
|
|
|
546
|
|
|
|
717
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other assets
|
|
|
18,806
|
|
|
|
18,822
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
265,157
|
|
|
$
|
361,176
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
|
Current Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$
|
2,348
|
|
|
$
|
5,345
|
|
Income taxes payable
|
|
|
16,632
|
|
|
|
14,593
|
|
Accrued payroll and related costs
|
|
|
2,395
|
|
|
|
2,480
|
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
4,458
|
|
|
|
4,740
|
|
Current portion of contract acquisition costs payable related to
Indian casino projects, net of $1.2 million discount
|
|
|
1,850
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other accrued expenses
|
|
|
2,209
|
|
|
|
2,191
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
29,892
|
|
|
|
29,349
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt, other, net of unamortized discount of
$0.9 million at December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
104,471
|
|
Contract acquisition costs payable related to Indian casino
projects, net of $2.8 million discount
|
|
|
7,923
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warrant liability
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,816
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term liabilities
|
|
|
7,923
|
|
|
|
110,287
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
37,815
|
|
|
|
139,636
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minority interest in subsidiary
|
|
|
14,570
|
|
|
|
16,764
|
|
Shareholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series A preferred stock, $.01 par value; authorized
7,500 shares; 4,458 issued and outstanding at
September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, respectively
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
Common stock, $.01 par value; authorized
200,000 shares; 24,456 and 22,949 issued and outstanding at
September 30, 2007, and December 31, 2006, respectively
|
|
|
245
|
|
|
|
229
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
189,148
|
|
|
|
171,710
|
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
23,353
|
|
|
|
33,250
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
(458
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity
|
|
|
212,772
|
|
|
|
204,776
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity
|
|
$
|
265,157
|
|
|
$
|
361,176
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial
statements
3
LAKES
ENTERTAINMENT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Earnings (Loss) and
Comprehensive Earnings (Loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended
|
|
|
Nine months ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
October 1,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
October 1,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
License fee income
|
|
$
|
2,695
|
|
|
$
|
4,672
|
|
|
$
|
12,535
|
|
|
$
|
18,098
|
|
Host fees, sponsorship, online gaming and other
|
|
|
1,732
|
|
|
|
1,221
|
|
|
|
4,158
|
|
|
|
5,315
|
|
Management, consulting and development fees
|
|
|
2,580
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
3,415
|
|
|
|
345
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
7,007
|
|
|
|
5,908
|
|
|
|
20,108
|
|
|
|
23,758
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative
|
|
|
10,058
|
|
|
|
8,772
|
|
|
|
29,747
|
|
|
|
26,787
|
|
Production costs
|
|
|
1,355
|
|
|
|
1,737
|
|
|
|
6,594
|
|
|
|
8,333
|
|
Loss on abandonment of online gaming assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,270
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net impairment losses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
331
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of intangible assets related to Indian casino
projects
|
|
|
1,121
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
1,126
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
192
|
|
|
|
158
|
|
|
|
573
|
|
|
|
431
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses
|
|
|
12,726
|
|
|
|
10,673
|
|
|
|
40,641
|
|
|
|
35,557
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net realized and unrealized gains (losses) on notes
receivable
|
|
|
(600
|
)
|
|
|
5,788
|
|
|
|
8,503
|
|
|
|
38,911
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) from operations
|
|
|
(6,319
|
)
|
|
|
1,023
|
|
|
|
(12,030
|
)
|
|
|
27,112
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
981
|
|
|
|
1,209
|
|
|
|
7,613
|
|
|
|
2,299
|
|
Interest expense, related party
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(137
|
)
|
Interest expense, other
|
|
|
(330
|
)
|
|
|
(360
|
)
|
|
|
(646
|
)
|
|
|
(5,000
|
)
|
Amortization of debt issuance costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(139
|
)
|
|
|
(95
|
)
|
|
|
(450
|
)
|
Loss on extinguishment of debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,830
|
)
|
|
|
(6,821
|
)
|
Gain on sale of investment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,541
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,216
|
|
Other
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income, net
|
|
|
701
|
|
|
|
5,256
|
|
|
|
3,120
|
|
|
|
188
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) before income taxes and minority interest in
net (earnings) loss of subsidiary
|
|
|
(5,618
|
)
|
|
|
6,279
|
|
|
|
(8,910
|
)
|
|
|
27,300
|
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
453
|
|
|
|
2,195
|
|
|
|
1,142
|
|
|
|
8,742
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) before minority interest in net (earnings)
loss of subsidiary
|
|
|
(6,071
|
)
|
|
|
4,084
|
|
|
|
(10,052
|
)
|
|
|
18,558
|
|
Minority interest in net (earnings) loss of subsidiary
|
|
|
859
|
|
|
|
(1,035
|
)
|
|
|
3,035
|
|
|
|
(3,383
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings (loss)
|
|
|
(5,212
|
)
|
|
|
3,049
|
|
|
|
(7,017
|
)
|
|
|
15,175
|
|
Stock warrant inducement discount
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,444
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings (loss) available to common shareholders
|
|
|
(5,212
|
)
|
|
|
3,049
|
|
|
|
(8,461
|
)
|
|
|
15,175
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive earnings (loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gains (loss) on marketable securities, net of tax
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
125
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
(301
|
)
|
Change in estimated fair value of derivative
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(468
|
)
|
|
|
409
|
|
|
|
(629
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive earnings (loss)
|
|
$
|
(5,182
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,706
|
|
|
$
|
(8,022
|
)
|
|
$
|
14,245
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) available to common shareholders per
share basic
|
|
$
|
(0.21
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.13
|
|
|
$
|
(0.36
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.67
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) available to common shareholders per
share diluted
|
|
$
|
(0.21
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.12
|
|
|
$
|
(0.36
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.62
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average common shares outstanding
basic
|
|
|
24,393
|
|
|
|
22,876
|
|
|
|
23,758
|
|
|
|
22,720
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dilutive effect of common stock equivalents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,752
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,826
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average common shares outstanding
diluted
|
|
|
24,393
|
|
|
|
24,628
|
|
|
|
23,758
|
|
|
|
24,546
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial
statements
4
LAKES
ENTERTAINMENT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
October 1,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings (loss)
|
|
$
|
(7,017
|
)
|
|
$
|
15,175
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings (loss) to net cash used in
operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
818
|
|
|
|
685
|
|
Amortization of debt issuance costs
|
|
|
95
|
|
|
|
450
|
|
Amortization of debt discount
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
446
|
|
Decrease in value of warrant liability
|
|
|
(2,272
|
)
|
|
|
(44
|
)
|
Amortization of intangible assets related to Indian casino
projects
|
|
|
1,126
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
Share-based compensation
|
|
|
3,607
|
|
|
|
4,973
|
|
Loss on extinguishment of debt
|
|
|
2,783
|
|
|
|
6,821
|
|
Loss on abandonment of online gaming assets
|
|
|
2,270
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net realized and unrealized gains on notes receivable
|
|
|
(9,565
|
)
|
|
|
(38,911
|
)
|
Minority interest in net earnings (loss) of subsidiary
|
|
|
(3,035
|
)
|
|
|
3,383
|
|
Gain on sale of investment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,216
|
)
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
(85
|
)
|
|
|
5,495
|
|
Net impairment losses
|
|
|
331
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
(1,501
|
)
|
|
|
294
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
(666
|
)
|
|
|
(52
|
)
|
Income taxes payable
|
|
|
601
|
|
|
|
3,114
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
(1,054
|
)
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
(281
|
)
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
|
(68
|
)
|
|
|
1,461
|
|
Contract acquisition costs payable
|
|
|
(227
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in operating activities
|
|
|
(13,023
|
)
|
|
|
(7,985
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of marketable securities
|
|
|
(90,861
|
)
|
|
|
(78,202
|
)
|
Sale/maturity of marketable securities
|
|
|
90,179
|
|
|
|
39,351
|
|
Proceeds from sale of land held for development
|
|
|
8,758
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collections on notes receivable
|
|
|
3,759
|
|
|
|
2,955
|
|
Increases in long-term assets related to Indian casino projects
|
|
|
(15,120
|
)
|
|
|
(37,412
|
)
|
Advances to unconsolidated investees
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,923
|
)
|
Advances on notes receivable current
|
|
|
(3,029
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sale of investment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,236
|
|
Purchase of property and equipment
|
|
|
(2,158
|
)
|
|
|
(4,682
|
)
|
Increase in other long-term assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(78
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(8,472
|
)
|
|
|
(70,755
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease (increase) in restricted cash
|
|
|
12,844
|
|
|
|
(16,099
|
)
|
Debt issuance costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,004
|
)
|
Restricted cash proceeds from long-term debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,090
|
|
Unrestricted cash proceeds from long-term debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
109,860
|
|
Repayment of long-term debt
|
|
|
(105,000
|
)
|
|
|
(35,000
|
)
|
Cash proceeds from issuance of common and preferred stock
|
|
|
9,699
|
|
|
|
3,283
|
|
Shareholder trading settlement
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,805
|
|
Cash proceeds from sale of participation notes
|
|
|
102,114
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities
|
|
|
19,657
|
|
|
|
78,935
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(1,838
|
)
|
|
|
195
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents beginning of period
|
|
|
9,759
|
|
|
|
9,912
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents end of period
|
|
$
|
7,921
|
|
|
$
|
10,107
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial
statements
5
LAKES
ENTERTAINMENT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements
The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements of
Lakes Entertainment, Inc., a Minnesota corporation
(Lakes or the Company), have been
prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities
and Exchange Commission (SEC) applicable to interim
financial information. Accordingly, certain information normally
included in the annual financial statements prepared in
accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States has been condensed
and/or
omitted. As of September 30, 2007, Lakes owned
approximately 61% of WPT Enterprises, Inc. (WPTE).
Accordingly, Lakes unaudited condensed consolidated
financial statements include the results of operations of WPTE,
and a substantial portion of Lakes revenues for the
periods reported have been derived from WPTEs business.
For further information, please refer to the annual audited
consolidated financial statements of the Company, and the
related notes included within the Companys Annual Report
on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2006, as amended,
previously filed with the SEC on October 19, 2007, from
which the balance sheet information as of that date is derived.
In the opinion of management, all adjustments considered
necessary for a fair presentation have been included, consisting
only of normal recurring adjustments. The results for the
current interim period are not necessarily indicative of the
results to be expected for the full year.
WPTE has reclassified $7.0 million of investments in
marketable securities that were previously reported erroneously
as current assets to non-current assets as of December 31,
2006. This reclassification is also reflected in Lakes
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet. In addition,
certain other minor reclassifications to amounts previously
reported have been made to conform to the current period
presentation. These reclassifications had no effect on net
earnings (loss) or shareholders equity as previously
presented.
|
|
2.
|
Long-Term
Assets Related to Indian Casino Projects
|
At September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, long-term
assets related to Indian casino projects are primarily related
to three separate projects for the Pokagon Band of Potawatomi
Indians (the Pokagon Band), Shingle Springs Band of
Miwok Indians (the Shingle Springs Tribe) and the
Jamul Indian Village (the Jamul Tribe) as indicated
in the following tables (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shingle
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pokagon
|
|
|
Springs
|
|
|
Jamul
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band
|
|
|
Tribe
|
|
|
Tribe
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
Notes receivable, at estimated fair value
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
52,176
|
|
|
$
|
23,616
|
|
|
$
|
3,486
|
|
|
$
|
79,278
|
|
Land held for development
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,751
|
|
|
|
846
|
|
|
|
7,597
|
|
Intangible assets related to Indian casino projects, net(*)
|
|
|
32,454
|
|
|
|
21,812
|
|
|
|
11,556
|
|
|
|
1,120
|
|
|
|
66,942
|
|
Other
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
767
|
|
|
|
1,016
|
|
|
|
3,772
|
|
|
|
5,615
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
32,514
|
|
|
$
|
74,755
|
|
|
$
|
42,939
|
|
|
$
|
9,224
|
|
|
$
|
159,432
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
LAKES
ENTERTAINMENT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shingle
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pokagon
|
|
|
Springs
|
|
|
Jamul
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band
|
|
|
Tribe
|
|
|
Tribe
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Notes receivable, at estimated fair value
|
|
$
|
100,544
|
|
|
$
|
40,912
|
|
|
$
|
20,754
|
|
|
$
|
2,098
|
|
|
$
|
164,308
|
|
Land held for development
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,739
|
|
|
|
6,710
|
|
|
|
1,341
|
|
|
|
16,790
|
|
Intangible assets related to Indian casino projects, net(*)
|
|
|
23,573
|
|
|
|
20,387
|
|
|
|
9,760
|
|
|
|
559
|
|
|
|
54,279
|
|
Other
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
2,041
|
|
|
|
2,207
|
|
|
|
4,142
|
|
|
|
8,450
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
124,177
|
|
|
$
|
72,079
|
|
|
$
|
39,431
|
|
|
$
|
8,140
|
|
|
$
|
243,827
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(*) |
|
Intangible assets consist primarily of contractual rights to
develop, finance and/or manage Indian-owned casino properties.
Amortization of intangible assets begins once the related
project becomes operational, and is calculated using the
straight line method over the term of the underlying contract. |
Pokagon
Band.
On August 2, 2007, the Four Winds Casino Resort in New
Buffalo, Michigan opened to the public. Lakes has a five-year
contract for management of the Four Winds Casino Resort.
Accordingly, management fees for the approximate eight weeks of
operations since the opening have been included in the
accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial
statements for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2007.
On March 2, 2007 (the Settlement Date), Lakes
contracted with a group of investors for their participation in
the loans made by Lakes to the Pokagon Band for the development
of the Four Winds Casino Resort, which loans have been assumed
by the Pokagon Gaming Authority. As of the Settlement Date, the
face value of Lakes notes receivable was approximately
$104.2 million, including accrued interest of approximately
$33.0 million. On the Settlement Date, Lakes transferred
100% of the Pokagon Gaming Authority loans to the aforementioned
group of investors for cash proceeds of approximately
$102.1 million, which was based upon the accreted value of
the Pokagon Gaming Authority loans less a two percent discount.
Lakes incurred transaction fees of approximately
$1.1 million, which were recorded as a reduction of net
realized and unrealized gains on notes receivable in the
accompanying Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of
Earnings (Loss) and Comprehensive Earnings (Loss). Accordingly,
based upon the previously recorded estimated fair value of the
notes at December 31, 2006, Lakes realized a gain of
$0.5 million as a result of the consummation of the
participation agreement.
The participation agreements also allow the participants to
pledge or exchange the notes receivable and Lakes no longer has
any rights or obligations with respect to the loans and is
isolated from liability, even in default. As a result, the
Pokagon notes receivable participation transaction has been
treated as a sale pursuant to Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 140, Accounting for Transfers and
Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishment of
Liabilities. The sale does not have any effect on
Lakes related management agreement with the Pokagon Band.
The participation agreements entitled Lakes to appoint an agent
for purposes of servicing and administering of the loans.
Accordingly, Lakes has appointed Bank of America, N.A.
(BofA) to provide these services for an annual fee
of approximately $20,000.
7
LAKES
ENTERTAINMENT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Shingle
Springs Tribe.
The following table provides the key assumptions used to value
the notes receivable at estimated fair value (dollars in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, 2007
|
|
As of December 31, 2006
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
Face value of note (principal and interest)
|
|
$65,460
|
|
$55,942
|
|
|
($47,068 principal and $18,392 interest)
|
|
($42,310 principal and $13,632 interest)
|
Estimated months until casino opens (weighted-average of three
scenarios)
|
|
15 months
|
|
28 months
|
Projected interest rate until casino opens
|
|
9.67%
|
|
9.98%
|
Projected interest rate during the loan repayment term
|
|
10.28%
|
|
9.76%
|
Discount rate
|
|
15%
|
|
15%
|
Repayment terms of
note(*)
|
|
84 months
|
|
|
Projected repayment terms of note (**)
|
|
|
|
24 months
|
Probability rate of casino opening (weighting of four scenarios)
|
|
95%
|
|
85%
|
|
|
|
(*) |
|
Note is payable in even monthly installments over the course of
the management agreement subsequent to the casino opening. |
|
(**) |
|
Note was previously payable in varying monthly installments
based on contract terms subsequent to the casino opening. |
On June 28, 2007, an affiliate of the Shingle Springs Tribe
closed on a $450 million senior note financing to fund the
Foothill Oaks Casino project in Shingle Springs, California.
Immediately following the closing of this financing, Lakes was
repaid approximately $17.2 million by the Shingle Springs
Tribe for land Lakes had previously purchased on behalf of the
Shingle Springs Tribe, and for certain construction advances
including accrued interest thereon. Lakes, through a
wholly-owned subsidiary, has management and development
agreements with an affiliate of the Shingle Springs Tribe to
develop and manage the Foothill Oaks Casino. Amounts owed to
Lakes under the management and development agreements are
subordinated to the $450 million senior note financing.
The net unrealized gains on notes receivable related to the
Shingle Springs Tribe casino project were $1.2 million and
$2.6 million for the three months ended September 30,
2007 and October 1, 2006, respectively, and
$7.9 million and $5.1 million for the nine months
ended September 30, 2007 and October 1, 2006,
respectively, and are included in the accompanying Unaudited
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Earnings (Loss) and
Comprehensive Earnings (Loss).
8
LAKES
ENTERTAINMENT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Jamul
Tribe.
The following table provides the key assumptions used to value
the notes receivable at estimated fair value (dollars in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, 2007
|
|
As of December 31, 2006
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
Face value of note (principal and interest)
|
|
$40,591
|
|
$32,952
|
|
|
($29,278 principal and $11,313 interest)
|
|
($24,509 principal and $8,443 interest)
|
Estimated months until casino opens (weighted-average of three
scenarios)
|
|
29 months
|
|
29 months
|
Projected interest rate until casino opens
|
|
9.67%
|
|
9.98%
|
Projected interest rate during the loan repayment term
|
|
10.49%
|
|
9.76%
|
Discount rate
|
|
17.50%
|
|
15.75%
|
Projected repayment terms of note
|
|
120 months
|
|
120 months
|
Probability rate of casino opening (weighting of four scenarios)
|
|
85%
|
|
85%
|
The net unrealized gain (loss) on notes receivable related to
the Jamul Tribe casino project were ($1.8) million and
$1.1 million for the three months ended September 30,
2007 and October 1, 2006, respectively, and
($0.1) million and $8.4 million for the nine months
ended September 30, 2007 and October 1, 2006,
respectively, and are included in the accompanying Unaudited
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Earnings (Loss) and
Comprehensive Earnings (Loss).
|
|
3.
|
Intangible
assets related to Indian casino projects and related
obligations
|
Intangible assets consist of costs associated with the
acquisition of the management, development, consulting or
financing contracts related to tribal gaming projects and are
periodically evaluated for impairment after they are initially
recorded. Information with respect to the intangible assets
related to the acquisition of management, development,
consulting or financing contracts by project is summarized as
follows, (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shingle
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pokagon
|
|
|
Springs
|
|
|
Jamul
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band
|
|
|
Tribe
|
|
|
Tribe
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Balance as of January 1, 2006
|
|
$
|
18,356
|
|
|
$
|
18,755
|
|
|
$
|
7,872
|
|
|
$
|
1,105
|
|
|
$
|
46,088
|
|
Allocation of advances made to Indian tribes
|
|
|
4,167
|
|
|
|
1,632
|
|
|
|
1,888
|
|
|
|
590
|
|
|
|
8,277
|
|
Acquisition of management contract rights
|
|
|
1,050
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
1,124
|
|
Amortization expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
Impairment loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,201
|
)
|
|
|
(1,201
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2006
|
|
|
23,573
|
|
|
|
20,387
|
|
|
|
9,760
|
|
|
|
559
|
|
|
|
54,279
|
|
Allocation of advances made to Indian tribes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,425
|
|
|
|
1,796
|
|
|
|
598
|
|
|
|
3,819
|
|
Acquisition of management contract rights
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
Amortization expense
|
|
|
(1,119
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
(1,125
|
)
|
Impairment loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(31
|
)
|
|
|
(31
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of September 30, 2007 (unaudited)
|
|
$
|
32,454
|
|
|
$
|
21,812
|
|
|
$
|
11,556
|
|
|
$
|
1,120
|
|
|
$
|
66,942
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9
LAKES
ENTERTAINMENT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Lakes amortizes the intangible assets related to the acquisition
of the management, development, consulting or financing
contracts under the straight-line method over the lives of the
contracts in accordance with FASB No. 142, which commences
when the related casinos open. Amortization expense related to
the Four Winds Casino Resort commenced upon opening in August of
2007.
The opening of the Four Winds Casino Resort triggered
obligations for Lakes to pay two unrelated third parties amounts
related to the acquisition of the management contract with the
Pokagon Band. The first obligation of $10.6 million is
payable quarterly for five years and the second obligation of
$3.2 million is payable monthly for two years. These
obligations do not have a stated interest rate and have payments
terms which extend beyond one fiscal year. As a result, these
intangible assets and related obligations have been recorded at
their net present value. The intangible assets are being
amortized over the life of the management contract.
The related obligations have also been recorded at their net
present value and the difference between the face amount,
$13.8 million, and the net present value of the
obligations, $9.8 million, is recorded as a discount, which
is amortized to interest expense as the payments are made
pursuant to the respective agreement.
For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007,
Lakes recognized approximately $1.1 million of amortization
expense for intangible assets related to Indian casino projects
and $0.3 million of interest expense related to the
obligation to third parties for acquisition of the Pokagon
management contract. There was no amortization or interest
expense related to intangible assets recognized in the
comparable 2006 periods.
During fiscal 2006, Lakes recognized a $1.2 million
impairment charge related to its intangible asset related to the
acquisition of the management, development and consulting
contracts with the Pawnee Nations Chilocco Casino and
Travel Plaza.
On March 2, 2007, Lakes repaid its $105 million credit
agreement with BofA and certain lenders under a financing
facility (the Credit Agreement), using proceeds
received from the Pokagon notes receivable participation
transaction (as described in Note 2) in addition to
amounts previously included in a restricted interest reserve
account related to the Credit Agreement. Lakes incurred
approximately $1.1 million in a prepayment penalty
associated with the payoff of the Credit Agreement. The
prepayment penalty, along with the remaining unamortized portion
of the related debt issuance costs and unamortized discount of
approximately $1.8 million and $0.9 million,
respectively, were also written off, resulting in a loss on
extinguishment of debt of approximately $3.8 million in the
first quarter of 2007, which is included in the accompanying
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statement of Earnings (Loss)
and Comprehensive Earnings (Loss).
Pursuant to the terms and conditions of a financing agreement
dated as of February 15, 2006 among Lakes, PLKS Funding,
LLC and various subsidiaries of Lakes, PLKS Holdings, LLC
(PLKS) was granted a warrant to purchase common
shares of Lakes at $7.50 per share (the Warrant),
which had an expiration date of February 15, 2013. During
April 2007, PLKS exercised and purchased 102,500 shares
underlying the Warrant at $7.50 per share and paid Lakes
$0.8 million.
On May 4, 2007, Lakes and PLKS amended the exercise price
of the Warrant (the Amendment). The Amendment
reduced the exercise price of the Warrant from $7.50 per share
to $6.50 per share for the remaining 1,147,500 shares
underlying the Warrant. In consideration for the amended
exercise price, PLKS agreed to, within two days of the execution
of the Amendment, exercise the Warrant with respect to the
remaining 1,147,500 shares underlying the Warrant and pay
the aggregate exercise price of $7.5 million, which PLKS
did on May 7, 2007. The Company calculated the impacts of
the Amendments reduction in the exercise price and of
PLKSs agreement to exercise the Warrant within two days of
the Amendments execution on the fair value of the Warrant
using a Black-Scholes pricing model; this calculation of the
impacts consisted of valuing the Warrant with and without the
10
LAKES
ENTERTAINMENT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Amendment in force. The variables used in the Black-Scholes
model were the value of the common stock on which the Warrant
was written, the Warrants exercise price, the period of
time until the Warrants expected expiration date, the
expected price volatility of the common stock, the zero-coupon
risk-free interest rate applicable to the period of time until
the Warrants expected expiration date, and the present
value of the expected dividends on the common stock during the
term of the Warrant. As a result of the reduction in exercise
price of the Warrant, Lakes recognized a stock warrant
inducement discount of approximately $1.4 million during
the second quarter of 2007, which is included in the
determination of net earnings available to common shareholders
for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 in the
accompanying Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statement of
Earnings (Loss) and Comprehensive Earnings (Loss).
|
|
6.
|
Share-based
Compensation
|
The following table summarizes the consolidated share-based
compensation expense related to employee stock options and stock
purchases and non-vested shares under Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 123(R),
Share-Based Payment-Revised 2004
(SFAS No. 123(R)) for the three months
and nine months ended September 30, 2007 and
October 1, 2006, respectively.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended
|
|
|
Nine months ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
October 1,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
October 1,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited, in thousands)
|
|
|
Total cost of share-based payment plans
|
|
$
|
1,172
|
|
|
$
|
1,283
|
|
|
$
|
3,607
|
|
|
$
|
4,960
|
|
No income tax benefit was recognized in Lakes Unaudited
Condensed Consolidated Statement of Earnings (Loss) and
Comprehensive Earnings (Loss) for share-based compensation
arrangements for the three months and nine months ended
September 30, 2007 and October 1, 2006. Management
assessed the likelihood that the deferred tax assets relating to
future tax deductions from share-based compensation will be
recovered from future taxable income and determined that a
valuation allowance is necessary to the extent that management
currently believes it is more likely than not that tax benefits
will not be realized. Managements determination is based
primarily on historical earnings volatility, the relatively
short operating history of WPTE, and Lakes current stages
of planned operational activities.
Lakes and WPTE both use a Black-Scholes option-pricing model to
value stock options, which requires the consideration of
historical employee exercise behavior data and the use of a
number of assumptions including volatility of the
companies stock prices, the weighted-average risk-free
interest rate, and the weighted-average expected life of the
options. Since neither Lakes nor WPTE currently pay dividends,
the dividend rate variable in the Black-Scholes model is zero.
The following values represent the average per grant for the
indicated variables used to value options granted during the
three months and nine months ended September 30, 2007 and
October 1, 2006, respectively. There have been no
significant changes to the assumptions thus far in 2007 and none
are expected during the remainder of 2007.
Lakes
stock option plans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended
|
|
|
Nine months ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
October 1,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
October 1,
|
|
Key valuation assumptions:
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Expected volatility
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
58.21
|
%
|
|
|
54.95
|
%
|
|
|
59.99
|
%
|
Expected dividend yield
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
4.72
|
%
|
|
|
4.89
|
%
|
|
|
4.78
|
%
|
Expected term (in years)
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
8.2 years
|
|
|
|
8.2 years
|
|
|
|
8.2 years
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
There were no options granted during the three months ended
September 30, 2007. |
11
LAKES
ENTERTAINMENT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
Expected volatility The volatility assumption is
based on the historical weekly price data of Lakes stock
over a two-year period. Management evaluated whether there were
factors during that period which were unusual and which would
distort the volatility figure if used to estimate future
volatility and concluded that there were no such factors.
|
|
|
|
Forfeiture rate As share-based compensation expense
recognized is based on awards ultimately expected to vest,
expense for grants beginning upon adoption of SFAS 123(R)
will be reduced for estimated forfeitures. SFAS 123(R)
requires forfeitures to be estimated at the time of grant and
revised, if necessary, in subsequent periods if actual
forfeitures differ from those estimates. The Company has
reviewed the historical forfeitures which are minimal, and as
such will amortize the grants to the end of the vesting period
and will adjust for forfeitures at the end of the term.
|
|
|
|
Risk free interest rate The risk free interest rate
assumption is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in
effect at the time of grant and with maturities consistent with
the expected term of options.
|
|
|
|
Expected term The expected term of employee stock
options represents the weighted-average period that the stock
options are expected to remain outstanding. It is based upon an
analysis of the historical behavior of option holders during the
period from September 1995 to September 30, 2007.
Management believes historical data is reasonably representative
of future exercise behavior.
|
At Lakes annual shareholder meeting, which was held on
June 6, 2007, Lakes shareholders approved the 2007
Lakes Stock Option and Compensation Plan, which reserves a total
of 500,000 shares of the Companys common stock.
Shares that are subject to awards that terminate, lapse or are
cancelled or forfeited will be available again for grant under
the 2007 Plan. The Company issues new shares of common stock
upon exercise of options.
12
LAKES
ENTERTAINMENT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
The following table summarizes Lakes stock option activity
during the three months and nine months ended September 30,
2007 and October 1, 2006 (unaudited):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of common shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-avg.
|
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available
|
|
|
exercise
|
|
|
|
outstanding
|
|
|
Exercisable
|
|
|
for grant
|
|
|
price
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2006
|
|
|
4,716,400
|
|
|
|
3,712,350
|
|
|
|
35,500
|
|
|
$
|
6.15
|
|
Authorized
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited/cancelled/expired
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(112,500
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.82
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at April 1, 2007
|
|
|
4,603,900
|
|
|
|
4,025,750
|
|
|
|
35,500
|
|
|
$
|
6.15
|
|
Authorized
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
500,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
2,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,500
|
)
|
|
|
11.84
|
|
Forfeited/cancelled/expired
|
|
|
(44,500
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44,500
|
|
|
|
9.79
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(74,500
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.83
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at July 1, 2007
|
|
|
4,487,400
|
|
|
|
3,954,500
|
|
|
|
577,500
|
|
|
$
|
6.13
|
|
Authorized
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited/cancelled/expired
|
|
|
(1,500
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,500
|
|
|
|
8.13
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(75,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.63
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2007
|
|
|
4,410,900
|
|
|
|
3,881,200
|
|
|
|
579,000
|
|
|
$
|
6.13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at January 1, 2006
|
|
|
5,307,626
|
|
|
|
4,153,476
|
|
|
|
94,500
|
|
|
$
|
6.03
|
|
Authorized
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
30,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(30,000
|
)
|
|
|
9.77
|
|
Forfeited/cancelled/expired
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(550,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.65
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at April 2, 2006
|
|
|
4,787,626
|
|
|
|
3,711,626
|
|
|
|
64,500
|
|
|
$
|
6.10
|
|
Authorized
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,000
|
)
|
|
|
12.10
|
|
Forfeited/cancelled/expired
|
|
|
(5,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
8.15
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(25,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.75
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at July 2, 2006
|
|
|
4,762,626
|
|
|
|
3,718,126
|
|
|
|
64,500
|
|
|
$
|
6.11
|
|
Authorized
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,000
|
)
|
|
|
7.92
|
|
Forfeited/cancelled/expired
|
|
|
(1,500
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.67
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(2,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at October 1, 2006
|
|
|
4,761,126
|
|
|
|
3,750,326
|
|
|
|
62,500
|
|
|
$
|
6.11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13
LAKES
ENTERTAINMENT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
The following table summarizes significant ranges of Lakes
outstanding and exercisable options as of September 30,
2007 (unaudited):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options outstanding at September 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options exercisable at September 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
average
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
remaining
|
|
|
Weighted-average
|
|
|
intrinsic
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
intrinsic
|
|
Range of exercise prices
|
|
outstanding
|
|
|
contractual life
|
|
|
exercise price
|
|
|
value
|
|
|
exercisable
|
|
|
average price
|
|
|
value
|
|
|
$ (3.25 3.63)
|
|
|
286,200
|
|
|
|
3.7 years
|
|
|
$
|
3.45
|
|
|
$
|
1,738,086
|
|
|
|
286,200
|
|
|
$
|
3.45
|
|
|
$
|
1,738,086
|
|
(3.64 5.45)
|
|
|
2,324,700
|
|
|
|
1.5 years
|
|
|
|
4.21
|
|
|
|
12,355,612
|
|
|
|
2,324,700
|
|
|
|
4.21
|
|
|
|
12,355,612
|
|
(5.46 7.26)
|
|
|
60,000
|
|
|
|
6.2 years
|
|
|
|
7.18
|
|
|
|
141,300
|
|
|
|
45,000
|
|
|
|
7.18
|
|
|
|
105,975
|
|
(7.27 9.08)
|
|
|
1,412,000
|
|
|
|
6.0 years
|
|
|
|
8.13
|
|
|
|
1,980,330
|
|
|
|
1,074,000
|
|
|
|
8.13
|
|
|
|
1,506,285
|
|
(9.09 10.90)
|
|
|
72,000
|
|
|
|
6.3 years
|
|
|
|
10.36
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,450
|
|
|
|
10.48
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10.91 12.71)
|
|
|
91,000
|
|
|
|
7.4 years
|
|
|
|
11.47
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41,350
|
|
|
|
11.44
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12.72 14.53)
|
|
|
95,000
|
|
|
|
7.4 years
|
|
|
|
14.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45,500
|
|
|
|
14.01
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14.54 16.34)
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
7.3 years
|
|
|
|
16.11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
|
16.11
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16.35 18.16)
|
|
|
65,000
|
|
|
|
6.5 years
|
|
|
|
17.91
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,000
|
|
|
|
17.97
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,410,900
|
|
|
|
3.6 years
|
|
|
$
|
6.13
|
|
|
$
|
16,215,328
|
|
|
|
3,881,200
|
|
|
$
|
5.64
|
|
|
$
|
15,705,958
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The aggregate intrinsic value in the preceding table represents
the total pre-tax intrinsic value, based on Lakes closing
stock price of $9.53 on September 28, 2007, which would
have been received by the option holders had all option holders
exercised their options as of that date. The total intrinsic
value of options exercised during the three months and nine
months ended September 30, 2007 and October 1, 2006
were $0.4 million, $0.0 million, $1.3 million and
$2.2 million, respectively. As of September 30, 2007,
Lakes unrecognized share-based compensation related to
stock options was approximately $1.4 million, which is
expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of
1.3 years.
WPTE
stock option plan:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended
|
|
|
Nine months ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
October 1,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
October 1,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Expected volatility
|
|
|
69.89
|
%
|
|
|
77.31
|
%
|
|
|
71.98
|
%
|
|
|
79.44
|
%
|
Forfeiture rate
|
|
|
16.71
|
%
|
|
|
4.13
|
%
|
|
|
16.71
|
%
|
|
|
4.13
|
%
|
Expected dividend yield
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
|
4.07
|
%
|
|
|
4.62
|
%
|
|
|
4.46
|
%
|
|
|
4.65
|
%
|
Expected term (in years)
|
|
|
6 years
|
|
|
|
6.5 years
|
|
|
|
6 years
|
|
|
|
6.5 years
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expected volatility As WPTE has a relatively short
operating history and no definitive peer or peer groups,
expected volatility was based on historical volatility of
WPTEs stock price since it began trading in August 2004.
|
|
|
|
Forfeiture rate As share-based compensation expense
recognized is based on awards ultimately expected to vest,
expense for grants beginning upon adoption of SFAS 123(R)
will be reduced for estimated forfeitures. SFAS 123(R)
requires forfeitures to be estimated at the time of grant and
revised, if necessary, in subsequent periods if actual
forfeitures differ from those estimates. WPTE used historical
data to estimate employee departure behavior in estimating
future forfeitures.
|
|
|
|
Risk free interest rate The risk free interest rate
assumption is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in
effect at the time of grant and with maturities consistent with
the expected term of options.
|
|
|
|
Expected term Due to WPTEs limited operating
history including stock option exercises and forfeitures, WPTE
calculated expected term using the Simplified Method
in accordance with Staff Accounting Bulletin 107.
|
14
LAKES
ENTERTAINMENT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
The following table summarizes WPTE stock option activity during
the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2007
and October 1, 2006 (unaudited):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of common shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-avg.
|
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available
|
|
|
exercise
|
|
|
|
outstanding
|
|
|
Exercisable
|
|
|
for grant
|
|
|
price
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2006
|
|
|
2,318,166
|
|
|
|
1,050,200
|
|
|
|
983,501
|
|
|
$
|
6.76
|
|
Authorized
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
287,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(287,000
|
)
|
|
|
4.80
|
|
Forfeited/cancelled/expired
|
|
|
(90,466
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90,466
|
|
|
|
8.49
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at April 1, 2007
|
|
|
2,514,700
|
|
|
|
1,010,533
|
|
|
|
786,967
|
|
|
$
|
6.47
|
|
Authorized
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
182,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(182,000
|
)
|
|
|
4.53
|
|
Forfeited/cancelled/expired
|
|
|
(85,667
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
85,667
|
|
|
|
5.25
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(113,660
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0049
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at July 1, 2007
|
|
|
2,497,373
|
|
|
|
912,139
|
|
|
|
690,634
|
|
|
$
|
6.67
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Authorized
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
220,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(220,000
|
)
|
|
|
3.50
|
|
Forfeited/cancelled/expired
|
|
|
(202,599
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
202,599
|
|
|
|
7.26
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2007
|
|
|
2,514,774
|
|
|
|
1,307,106
|
|
|
|
673,233
|
|
|
$
|
6.34
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at January 1, 2006
|
|
|
2,158,000
|
|
|
|
620,333
|
|
|
|
283,667
|
|
|
$
|
7.14
|
|
Authorized
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
219,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(219,000
|
)
|
|
|
6.20
|
|
Forfeited/cancelled/expired
|
|
|
(159,333
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
159,333
|
|
|
|
8.13
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(115,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0049
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at April 2, 2006
|
|
|
2,102,667
|
|
|
|
785,500
|
|
|
|
224,000
|
|
|
$
|
7.36
|
|
Authorized
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,080,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
109,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(109,500
|
)
|
|
|
5.18
|
|
Forfeited/cancelled/expired
|
|
|
(153,501
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
153,501
|
|
|
|
10.07
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(105,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0049
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at July 2, 2006
|
|
|
1,953,666
|
|
|
|
619,333
|
|
|
|
1,348,001
|
|
|
$
|
7.42
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Authorized
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
249,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(249,000
|
)
|
|
|
4.22
|
|
Forfeited/cancelled/expired
|
|
|
(15,333
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,333
|
|
|
|
13.50
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at October 1, 2006
|
|
|
2,187,333
|
|
|
|
1,043,167
|
|
|
|
1,114,334
|
|
|
$
|
7.01
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15
LAKES
ENTERTAINMENT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
The following table summarizes significant ranges of WPTE
outstanding and exercisable options as of September 30,
2007 (unaudited):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options outstanding
|
|
|
Options exercisable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-avg.
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
Range of
|
|
Number
|
|
|
remaining
|
|
|
avg. exercise
|
|
|
intrinsic
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
intrinsic
|
|
exercise prices
|
|
outstanding
|
|
|
contractual life
|
|
|
price
|
|
|
value
|
|
|
exercisable
|
|
|
avg. price
|
|
|
value
|
|
|
$ 0.0049
|
|
|
111,340
|
|
|
|
4.41
|
|
|
$
|
0.0049
|
|
|
$
|
320,114
|
|
|
|
111,340
|
|
|
$
|
0.0049
|
|
|
$
|
320,114
|
|
$ 3.50 - 4.80
|
|
|
910,500
|
|
|
|
9.46
|
|
|
|
4.19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,500
|
|
|
|
4.21
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ 5.18 - 9.92
|
|
|
1,317,600
|
|
|
|
7.23
|
|
|
|
7.57
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,073,600
|
|
|
|
7.93
|
|
|
|
|
|
$11.95 - 14.51
|
|
|
166,000
|
|
|
|
7.88
|
|
|
|
12.17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
77,333
|
|
|
|
12.27
|
|
|
|
|
|
$15.05 - 19.50
|
|
|
9,334
|
|
|
|
7.83
|
|
|
|
15.53
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,333
|
|
|
|
15.45
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,514,774
|
|
|
|
7.96
|
|
|
$
|
6.34
|
|
|
$
|
320,114
|
|
|
|
1,307,106
|
|
|
$
|
7.45
|
|
|
$
|
320,114
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The aggregate intrinsic value in the preceding table represents
the total pre-tax intrinsic value, based on WPTEs closing
stock price of $2.88 on September 28, 2007, which would
have been received by the option holders had all option holders
exercised their options as of that date. The total intrinsic
value of options exercised during the nine months ended
September 30, 2007 and October 1, 2006 were,
$0.5 million and $1.4 million, respectively. As of
September 30, 2007. No options were exercised during the
three months ended September 30, 2007 and October 1,
2006, respectively. As of September 30, 2007, WPTEs
unrecognized share-based compensation related to stock options
was approximately $2.5 million, which is expected to be
recognized over a weighted-average period of 2.7 years.
|
|
7.
|
Earnings
(Loss) Available to Common Shareholders Per Share
|
For all periods, basic earnings (loss) available to common
shareholders per share is calculated by dividing net earnings
(loss) available to common shareholders by the weighted-average
number of common shares outstanding during the applicable
period. For the three months and nine months ended
October 1, 2006, respectively, diluted earnings (loss)
available to common shareholders per share reflects the effect
of all potentially dilutive common shares outstanding by
dividing net earnings (loss) available to common shareholders by
the weighted-average of all common and potentially dilutive
shares outstanding. Stock options of approximately
1.9 million were not included in the computation of diluted
earnings (loss) available to common shareholders per share for
the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2007,
respectively, because the effects would have been anti-dilutive
for those periods.
Lakes evaluated the ability to utilize deferred tax assets
arising from net operating loss carryforwards, and other
ordinary items and determined that a valuation allowance was
appropriate at September 30, 2007 and December 31,
2006. Lakes evaluated all evidence and determined net losses
(excluding net realized and unrealized gains and losses on notes
receivable) generated over the past five years outweighed the
current positive evidence that Lakes believes exists surrounding
its ability to generate significant income from its long-term
assets related to Indian casino projects. Therefore, Lakes
recorded a 100% valuation allowance against its deferred tax
assets related to net operating losses and other ordinary items
at September 30, 2007, and December 31, 2006, which is
the primary reason that Lakes effective tax rate is not
comparable to the statutory federal rate of 35%.
Lakes has recorded deferred tax assets related to capital
losses. The realization of these benefits is dependent on the
generation of capital gains during the applicable carryforward
periods. Lakes believes it will have sufficient capital gains in
the foreseeable future to utilize these benefits due to
significant appreciation in its investment in WPTE, which has a
minimal cost basis and could be sold at a substantial gain.
Lakes owns approximately 12.5 million shares of WPTE common
stock valued at approximately $36 million as of
September 30, 2007 based
16
LAKES
ENTERTAINMENT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
upon the closing stock price as reported by NASDAQ on
September 28, 2007 of $2.88. Accordingly, Lakes has not
established a valuation allowance for these deferred tax assets.
Lakes is currently disputing the results of an audit by the
Internal Revenue Service (IRS) for the fiscal years
ended 2001 and 2000, and has been petitioned by the Louisiana
Department of Revenue to pay additional Louisiana corporation
income
and/or
franchise taxes for the fiscal years ended 1999 through 2002.
Lakes may be required to pay taxes up to approximately
$12 million plus interest and fees related to these two tax
matters. Excluding these matters, Lakes is no longer subject to
U.S. federal or state/local income tax examinations by tax
authorities for years prior to 2003.
Effective January 1, 2007, Lakes adopted the provisions of
Financial Accounting Standards Board Interpretation No. 48,
Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes
(FIN 48). The adoption of FIN 48
resulted in an increase of $1.4 million in Lakes
liability for unrecognized tax benefits, which was accounted for
as a reduction of retained earnings as of January 1, 2007.
The adoption of FIN 48 did not materially affect net
operating loss carry forwards, the related deferred tax assets
and valuation allowance thereon, nor the income tax provision
through September 30, 2007.
At the beginning of 2007, Lakes liability for uncertain
tax positions was $10.1 million plus an additional
$8.2 million for the possible payment of interest and fees
related to these tax liabilities. These tax liabilities are
considered unrecognized tax benefits which would affect
Lakes effective tax rate if recognized. Lakes records
changes in accrued interest related to uncertain tax positions
as a component of income tax expense. There were no significant
changes in components of the liability during the first nine
months of 2007.
Lakes files a consolidated U.S. federal income tax return,
as well as income tax returns in various states.
Lakes believes it is reasonably possible that, within the next
12 months, it could recognize previously unrecognized tax
benefits of between $0.6 million and $1.4 million as a
result of the resolution of the IRS audit discussed above.
|
|
9.
|
Commitments
and contingencies
|
IRS tax audit. Lakes is under audit by
the IRS for the fiscal years ended 2001 and 2000. The IRS is
challenging the treatment of income categorized as a capital
gain. If Lakes is unsuccessful in sustaining its position, Lakes
may be required to pay up to approximately $3.2 million
plus accrued interest related to tax on ordinary income. Lakes
has recorded a liability for this matter including interest, as
described in Note 8, which is included as part of income
taxes payable on the accompanying Unaudited Condensed
Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Louisiana Department of Revenue Litigation Tax
Matter. The Louisiana Department of Revenue
maintains a position that Lakes owes additional Louisiana
corporation income tax for the period ended January 3, 1999
and the tax years ended 1999 through 2001 and additional
Louisiana corporation franchise tax for the tax years ended 2000
through 2002. This determination is the result of an audit of
Louisiana tax returns filed by Lakes for the tax periods at
issue and relates to the reporting of income earned by Lakes in
connection with the managing of two Louisiana-based casinos. On
December 20, 2004, the Secretary of the Department of
Revenue of the State of Louisiana filed a petition to collect
taxes in the amount of $8.6 million, plus interest, against
Lakes for the taxable periods set forth above. Lakes maintains
that it remitted the proper Louisiana corporation income tax and
Louisiana corporation franchise tax for the taxable periods at
issue. On February 14, 2005, Lakes filed an answer to the
petition to collect taxes asserting all proper defenses and
maintaining that no additional taxes were owed and that the
petition to collect taxes should be dismissed. Management
intends to continue to vigorously contest this action by the
Louisiana Department of Revenue. Lakes may be required to pay up
to the $8.6 million assessment plus interest if Lakes is
not successful in this matter. Lakes has determined it is more
likely than not that it will not be able to support its position
related to this tax matter. As such, Lakes has recorded a
liability for an estimated settlement related to this
examination including accrued interest and fees, which is
included as part of income taxes payable on the accompanying
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.
17
LAKES
ENTERTAINMENT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
WPTE China agreement and related
commitment. On August 6, 2007, WPTE
entered into an agreement with a Chinese government-sanctioned
body with authority over certain leisure sports, including the
popular national Chinese card game Traktor Poker,
known as Tuo La Ji. During the five year term of the
agreement, WPTE is to receive exclusive branding and certain
marketing and sponsorship rights related to the China National
Traktor Poker Tour. In exchange for these rights, WPTE is
required to pay an annual fee, which starts at approximately
$0.5 million in the first year and increases by 10%
annually for the remaining four years of the agreement. WPTE
does not consider the annual fees for years two through five to
be commitments as the agreement terminates for failure of
payment.
WPTE poker player litigation. On
July 19, 2006, a legal action was commenced against WPTE by
seven poker players that alleges, among other things, an unfair
business practice of WPTE. On March 14, 2007, the
plaintiffs filed a motion for summary judgment in the case and
on April 12, 2007, WPTE filed its opposition to the motion.
On May 22, 2007, the plaintiffs motion for summary
judgment was denied. A trial date has been set for April 1,
2008. Although WPTEs management is currently unable to
estimate the minimum loss to be incurred, if any, as a result of
the ultimate outcome of this matter, it believes that WPTE is
not likely to sustain any material loss in connection therewith,
and accordingly, no provision for loss has been recorded in
connection therewith.
Miscellaneous legal matters. Lakes and
its subsidiaries (including WPTE) are involved in various other
inquiries, administrative proceedings, and pending or threatened
litigation relating to contracts and other matters arising in
the normal course of business. While any proceeding or
litigation has an element of uncertainty, management currently
believes that an unfavorable outcome in these matters is not
probable. Furthermore, even in the event of an unfavorable
outcome in one or all of these matters, the estimated effect on
the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements would
not likely be material. Accordingly, no provision for loss has
been recorded in connection therewith.
Lakes principal business is the development and management
of gaming-related properties. Additionally, the Company is the
majority owner of WPTE. Substantially all of Lakes and
WPTEs operations are conducted in the United States.
Episodes of the World Poker
Tour®
television series are distributed internationally by a third
party distributor. Lakes segments reported below (in
millions) are the segments of the Company for which separate
financial information is available and for which operating
results are evaluated by the chief operating decision-maker in
deciding how to allocate resources and in assessing performance.
The total assets in Corporate and Eliminations below
primarily relate to Lakes short-term investments, deferred
tax assets, Lakes corporate office building and
construction in progress related to a Company-owned casino
project in Vicksburg, Mississippi. Costs in Corporate and
Eliminations below have not been allocated to the other
segments because these costs are not easily allocable and to do
so would not be practical.
18
LAKES
ENTERTAINMENT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Industry segments
|
|
|
|
Indian
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
casino
|
|
|
WPT
|
|
|
Corporate and
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
projects
|
|
|
Enterprises, Inc.
|
|
|
eliminations
|
|
|
consolidated
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
Total assets as of September 30, 2007
|
|
$
|
163.8
|
|
|
$
|
44.7
|
|
|
$
|
56.7
|
|
|
$
|
265.2
|
|
Total assets as of December 31, 2006
|
|
$
|
242.8
|
|
|
$
|
51.3
|
|
|
$
|
67.1
|
|
|
$
|
361.2
|
|
For the three months ended September 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
$
|
2.6
|
|
|
$
|
4.4
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
7.0
|
|
Earnings (loss) from operations
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
(2.6
|
)
|
|
|
(3.8
|
)
|
|
|
(6.3
|
)
|
Depreciation and amortization expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
For the three months ended October 1, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
5.9
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
5.9
|
|
Earnings (loss) from operations
|
|
|
5.6
|
|
|
|
(0.4
|
)
|
|
|
(4.2
|
)
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
Depreciation and amortization expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
For the nine months ended September 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
$
|
3.4
|
|
|
$
|
16.6
|
|
|
$
|
0.1
|
|
|
$
|
20.1
|
|
Earnings (loss) from operations
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
|
|
(9.1
|
)
|
|
|
(13.0
|
)
|
|
|
(12.0
|
)
|
Depreciation and amortization expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
For the nine months ended October 1, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
$
|
0.3
|
|
|
$
|
23.4
|
|
|
$
|
0.1
|
|
|
$
|
23.8
|
|
Earnings (loss) from operations
|
|
|
38.1
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
(12.0
|
)
|
|
|
27.1
|
|
Depreciation and amortization expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
WPTE Israel office closure. As a result
of the decision to cease development of WPTEs stand alone
online gaming platform based on the CyberArts software, WPTE
wrote off certain property and equipment and related capitalized
costs of approximately $2.3 million during the second
quarter of 2007. In addition to the write off, WPTE curtailed
the Israel operations and closed one of the two offices. During
the fourth quarter of 2007, further restructuring of the online
division has been initiated, including closing down the
remaining office in Israel. WPTE expects to incur approximately
$0.2 million in costs during the fourth quarter of 2007
related to the closing of the Israel location.
19
|
|
ITEM 2.
|
MANAGEMENTS
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS
|
Overview
We develop, finance and manage Indian-owned casino properties.
We currently have development and management agreements with
five separate tribes for casino operations in Michigan,
California, and Oklahoma, for a total of eight separate casino
sites. We are currently managing the Cimarron Casino for the
Iowa Tribe of Oklahoma (Iowa Tribe) and the Four
Winds Casino Resort for the Pokagon Band of Potawatomi Indians
(Pokagon Band). The remaining projects are in
various stages of development. We are also involved in other
business activities including development of a non-Indian casino
in Mississippi and the development of new table games for
licensing to both Tribal and non-Tribal casinos. In addition, as
of September 30, 2007, we owned approximately 61% of WPT
Enterprises, Inc. (WPTE), a separate publicly held
media and entertainment company. Our unaudited condensed
consolidated financial statements include the results of
operations of WPTE, and our revenues have been derived primarily
from WPTEs business.
WPTE creates internationally branded entertainment and consumer
products driven by the development, production and marketing of
televised programming based on gaming themes. The World Poker
Tour®
(WPT), is a television show based on a series of
high-stakes poker tournaments that airs in the United States and
has been licensed to telecast in more than 150 markets globally.
WPTE also operates a real-money online gaming website which
prohibits wagers from players in the United States and other
restricted jurisdictions. WPTE currently licenses its brand to
companies in the business of poker equipment and instruction,
apparel, publishing, electronic and wireless entertainment,
DVD/home entertainment, casino games, and giftware. WPTE is also
engaged in the sale of corporate sponsorships. WPTE has four
operating units:
WPT Studios. WPTEs multi-media
entertainment division, generates revenue from the domestic and
international licensing of broadcast and telecast rights of
WPTEs television shows and through casino host fees. Since
WPTEs inception, the WPT Studios division has been
responsible for 72% of total revenue. WPTE licensed WPT
series Seasons One through Five to the Travel Channel, LLC
(TRV or Travel Channel) for telecast in
the United States under an exclusive license agreement
(WPT Agreement). On April 2, 2007, WPTE entered
into an agreement (the GSN Agreement) with Game Show
Network, LLC (GSN), pursuant to which GSN agreed to
license Season Six for a $300,000 license fee per episode. WPTE
received an average of $477,000 per episode for Season Five of
the WPT television series from TRV. WPTE has license agreements
for the distribution of WPT and Professional Poker Tour
(PPT) episodes into international territories for
which WPTE receives license fees, net of WPTEs
agents sales fee and agreed upon sales and marketing
expenses. WPTE also collects annual host fees from member
casinos that host WPT events (WPTEs member casinos).
Since WPTEs inception, fees from TRV under the WPT
Agreement and an agreement with TRV relating to the PPT series
have been responsible for approximately 57% of WPTEs total
revenue. For each season covered by the WPT Agreement and
related options, TRV has exclusive rights to exhibit the
episodes in that season an unlimited number of times on its
television network in the United States for four years.
Under the TRV and GSN Agreements, TRV and GSN pay fixed license
fees for each episode WPTE produces, which are payable at
various times during the pre-production, production and
post-production process and revenues are recognized upon receipt
and acceptance of the completed episode. Television production
costs related to WPT episodes are generally capitalized and
charged to cost of revenues as revenues are recognized.
Therefore, the timing and number of episodes involved in the
various seasons of the series affect the timing of the revenues
and expenses
20
of the WPT Studios business. The following table describes the
timing of Seasons One through Six of the WPT series, including
the delivery and exhibition of the episodes each season:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date of
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
agreement or
|
|
episodes
|
|
|
|
|
|
World Poker
|
|
option for
|
|
(including
|
|
|
Production period and delivery
|
|
|
Tour®
season
|
|
season
|
|
specials)
|
|
|
of episodes
|
|
Initial telecast of episodes in season
|
|
Season One
|
|
January 2003
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
February 2002 June 2003
|
|
March 2003 June 2003
|
Season Two
|
|
August 2003
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
July 2003 June 2004
|
|
December 2003 September 2004
|
Season Three
|
|
May 2004
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
May 2004 April 2005
|
|
October 2004 August 2005
|
Season Four
|
|
March 2005
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
May 2005 April 2006
|
|
October 2005 June 2006
|
Season Five
|
|
March 2006
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
May 2006 April 2007
|
|
August 2006 August 2007
|
Season Six
|
|
April 2007
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
May 2007 April 2008 (projected)
|
|
March 2008 August 2008 (projected)
|
The agreement with TRV relating to the PPT series, which
continues to cover the broadcast rights to Season One of the
PPT, was substantially similar in structure to the TRV Agreement.
Under the WPT and PPT Agreements, TRV has the right to receive a
percentage of WPTEs adjusted gross revenues from
international television licenses, product licensing and
publishing, merchandising and certain other sources, after
specified minimum amounts are met. For the nine months ended
September 30, 2007, WPTE recognized $0.5 million of
Travel Channel participation expense that was recorded in cost
of revenues.
In December 2006, WPTE signed a multi-year agreement with
PartyGaming Plc (PartyGaming), owner of
PartyPoker.com, pursuant to which they sponsor certain
international television broadcasts of the WPT and PPT. The
agreement covers shows produced under WPTE Seasons Four, Five,
and Six and PPT Seasons One, Two and Three. The agreement helps
solidify and expand the international WPT brand through
PartyGamings extensive marketing resources, provides
valuable promotional opportunities for WPTs online gaming
site, WorldPokerTour.com, and represents a new revenue stream
for WPTE. PartyGaming receives exclusive in-show branded
integration and association with a premiere brand in televised
poker. For the three months ended September 30, 2007, WPTE
recognized revenues of $0.7 million from the PartyGaming
agreement.
WPT Global Marketing. Includes branded
consumer products, sponsorship, and event management divisions.
WPTE branded consumer products division generates revenue
principally from royalties from the licensing of the
WPTE brand to companies seeking to use the WPT brand and
logo in the retail sales of their consumer products. In
addition, this business unit generates revenue from direct sales
of WPTE-produced branded merchandise. WPTE has generated
significant revenues from existing licensees, including Hands-On
Mobile and MDI.
WPTE sponsorship and event management division generates revenue
from corporate sponsorship and management of televised and live
events. WPTE sponsorship program uses the professional sports
model as a method to foster entitlement sponsorship
opportunities and naming rights to major corporations.
Anheuser-Busch has been the largest source of revenues through
its sponsorship of Seasons Two, Three, Four and Five of the WPT
series on TRV. In addition, WPTE had an agreement with Blue
Diamond Almonds to sponsor the WPT Season Five Championship in
April 2007 at the Bellagio. WPTE recognized revenues from these
agreements when the Season Five programs were broadcast.
WPT Online. In 2005, WPTE began operating
WPTonline.com through a license agreement with WagerWorks, Inc.
(WagerWorks), under which WPTE licensed its brand to
WagerWorks and WagerWorks shared a percentage of all net revenue
it collected from the operation of the online poker room and
online casino. In June 2007, WPTonline.com ceased operations and
the relationship with WagerWorks, Inc. was terminated as WPTE
transitioned to a new online gaming software platform as
described below.
In 2006, WPTE decided to develop its own software for its online
poker room. WPTE licensed a software platform from CyberArts
Licensing, LLC (CyberArts), and hired approximately
30 employees in Israel to develop the software and a
support infrastructure. On April 23, 2007, WPTE entered
into a three year software supply and support agreement (the
CryptoLogic Agreement) with CryptoLogic Inc., and
its wholly-owned subsidiary WagerLogic Limited, (collectively
referred to as CryptoLogic). As a result of
WPTEs decision to
21
move away from the online gaming platform WPTE was developing
based on the CyberArts software and stopping the development of
WPTEs own online gaming site, WPTE wrote off certain
property and equipment and related capitalized costs of
approximately $2.3 million during the second quarter of
2007. In addition to the write off, during the second quarter of
2007, WPTE curtailed its Israel operations and closed one of
WPTEs two offices. In the fourth quarter of 2007, WPTE
decided to close the remaining office in Israel and expects to
incur approximately $0.2 million in closing costs during
the quarter.
Pursuant to the CryptoLogic Agreement, CryptoLogic operates an
online gaming site for WPTE featuring a poker room and casino
games utilizing its proprietary software in exchange for a
percentage of the revenue generated from the site. WPTE is
entitled to approximately 80% of net gaming revenues, as defined
below, from the operation of the site. Under the CryptoLogic
Agreement, WPTE is also a member in a centralized online gaming
network (the Network) with several other licensees
of CryptoLogic pursuant to which players are able to play on
WPTEs branded gaming site on the online gaming network.
On June 14, 2007 CryptoLogic delivered the poker software
to WPTE and the go-live date for WPTEs online poker room
was June 28, 2007. On July 26, 2007, CryptoLogic
delivered 10 casino games (the Initial Casino),
including multi-hand blackjack, European roulette and multiple
interactive slots including their most popular casino
games Millionaires
Club®,
Bejeweled®
and The Hulk TM. WPTE also has an option, exercisable at any
time prior to July 1, 2008, to require CryptoLogic to
provide WPTEs customers with access to a full suite of
casino games within three months of such notice.
WPTE is entitled to the following percentages of net gaming
revenue: (a) 78% of the first $150,000 per month,
(b) 79% of revenue in excess of $150,000 but less than
$500,000 per month; and (c) 80% of the revenue in excess of
$500,000 per month. CryptoLogic is entitled to earn a minimum
guaranteed revenue associated with the Initial casino of
$500,000 per year or $125,000 for the Initial Casino per
quarter. In the third quarter, WPTE had a shortfall of $77,000,
which will be netted against future settlements from CryptoLogic.
If, at any time after the nine month anniversary of the go-live
date monthly gaming revenues fall below $500,000 for three
consecutive months, CryptoLogic has the right to terminate the
CryptoLogic Agreement on 90 days written notice. However,
WPTE may prevent any such termination through payment of the
shortfall of CryptoLogics percentage of such gaming
revenue within 30 days of receipt of CryptoLogics
notice of termination.
WPT China. On August 6, 2007, WPTE
entered into a Cooperation Agreement (the Cooperation
Agreement) with the China Leisure Sports Administrative
Center (the CLSAC), a Chinese government-sanctioned
body with authority over certain leisure sports, including the
popular Chinese national card game Traktor Poker or
Tuo La Ji. Pursuant to the Cooperation
Agreement, WPTE has the right to brand and exploit the China
National Traktor Poker TourTM (the Traktor Poker
Tour) during the five year term of the Cooperation
Agreement. Additionally, WPTE is afforded certain marketing and
sponsorship rights in conjunction with the Traktor Poker Tour,
including the right to sanction and derive revenue from
third-party branding at tour events and the right to exploit
films and other content generated in conjunction with the
Traktor Poker Tour in all media. Furthermore, the CLSAC agreed
to organize no less than 15 Traktor Poker Tour events each year
during the term, to secure placement of the championship finals
on a major Chinese television station, and agreed to promote the
Traktor Poker Tour. In exchange, WPTE pays a yearly fee to the
CLSAC starting at approximately $0.5 million for the first
year and increasing by 10% annually for the remaining four years
of the term.
On October 12, 2007, WPTE officially launched the inaugural
season of the Traktor Poker Tour in Lanzhou, Gansu. The
tournament was the first of 15 regional preliminary tournaments
to be held each weekend throughout China, which will run from
October 2007 through April 2008. Tour play is based on a team
structure where teams in each tour city compete to qualify for a
final tournament called the grand final.
Results
of Operations
The following discussion and analysis should be read in
conjunction with the unaudited condensed consolidated financial
statements and notes thereto included elsewhere in this
Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the three months and nine months ended September 30,
2007, respectively.
22
Three
months ended September 30, 2007 compared to the three
months ended October 1, 2006
Revenues. Total revenues increased by
$1.1 million during the three months ended
September 30, 2007 compared to the three months ended
October 1, 2006. Domestic television licensing revenues
decreased $1.7 million in the third quarter of 2007
compared to the 2006 period. The decrease was primarily a result
of the delivery of three episodes of Season Five of the WPT
series in the third quarter of 2007 versus the delivery of one
episode of Season Five of the WPT and nine episodes of the PPT
in the 2006 period. International television licensing revenues
decreased by $0.1 million as a result of fewer distribution
agreements in the international marketplace. Product licensing
revenues decreased by approximately $0.1 million in the
third quarter of 2007 compared to the 2006 period. The decrease
was primarily due to lower license revenues from US Playing
Cards and MDI. Online gaming decreased $0.8 million
primarily due to lower levels of player activity versus the
prior year period, which was primarily a result of migrating
less than 20% of WPTEs player database from WagerWorks, as
well as not aggressively marketing the online gaming site. Event
hosting and sponsorship revenues increased $1.3 million
primarily due to PartyGaming sponsorship revenues that did not
exist in the same period in 2006 and sponsorship revenues from
the airing of seven Season Five episodes in the third quarter of
2007 versus no airings in the prior year period.
Lakes casino management fees were $2.6 million during
the third quarter of 2007 and primarily related to fees from the
management of the Four Winds Casino Resort and the Cimarron
Casino. There were no casino management fees during the third
quarter of 2006.
Selling, general and administrative
expense. Selling, general and administrative
expense increased approximately $1.3 million in the third
quarter of 2007 compared to the 2006 period. The increase was
primarily due to costs associated with WPTEs online gaming
operations, as well as increased costs associated with WPT
China, which was not established in the 2006 period.
Production costs. Production costs decreased
by approximately $0.4 million in the third quarter of 2007
compared to the 2006 period. The decrease was primarily a result
of a decrease in online gaming costs as there were lower levels
of player activity as WPTE transitioned operations from the
WagerWorks network to the CryptoLogic network. Overall gross
margins for WPTE were 69% in the third quarter of 2007 compared
to 70% in the third quarter of 2006. Domestic television
licensing margins were 42% in the third quarter of 2007 compared
to 73% in the same period in 2006. This decrease was principally
because of the delivery of nine episodes of WPTEs PPT
series in the 2006 period for which the production costs had
been expensed in an earlier period. The lower domestic
television margins in the 2007 period were largely offset by
increased margin contribution, international television and
sponsorship.
Amortization of intangible assets related to Indian casino
projects. Amortization of intangible assets
related to Indian casino projects was $1.1 million for the
three months ended September 30, 2007. This amortization
related primarily to the intangible assets associated with the
Four Winds Casino Resort, which began when it opened to the
public on August 2, 2007. There was no amortization of
intangible assets related to the Indian casino projects for the
three months ended October 1, 2006.
Net unrealized gains (losses) on notes
receivable. Net unrealized gains (losses) on
notes receivable were ($0.6) million and $5.8 million
for the three months ended September 30, 2007 and
October 1, 2006, respectively. The net unrealized loss in
the third quarter of 2007 related primarily to our notes
receivable from the Jamul Indian Village (Jamul
Tribe), which were partially offset by unrealized gains
from the Shingle Springs Band of Miwok Indians (Shingle
Springs Tribe). Net unrealized gains (losses) are the
result of adjustment of notes receivable related to tribal
casino projects to their estimated fair value based upon current
tribal casino projects status.
The increase in fair value of the notes receivable from the
Shingle Springs Tribe relates primarily to continued progress on
the construction of this project, which is currently within
budget and on schedule.
The decrease in fair value of the notes receivable from the
Jamul Tribe relates primarily to an increase in discount rate
which resulted from a decrease in current estimated win per unit
for this project.
During the third quarter of 2006, the net unrealized gains of
$5.8 million related primarily to favorable events
occurring during the third quarter of 2006, which increased the
estimated probability of opening for the Shingle
23
Springs Tribes casino development project. Specifically,
during September of 2006, the Shingle Springs Tribe reached an
agreement with El Dorado County that will provide El Dorado
County with certain funding from the planned Shingle Springs
Tribe casino operations. El Dorado County also agreed to seek
dismissal of all of its existing litigation against the Shingle
Springs Tribe and formally support the Shingle Springs Tribe
interchange and casino projects.
Other income. Other income for the third
quarter of 2007 was $0.7 million compared to other income
of $5.3 million for the third quarter of 2006. In the first
quarter of 2006, Lakes issued a warrant to PLKS Holdings, LLC in
connection with a financing agreement. During the third quarter
of 2006, we adjusted the liability related to this warrant to
its estimated fair value, which resulted in a decrease to
interest expense of approximately $2.9 million. Also during
the third quarter of 2006, WPTE recognized a $4.5 million
gain on sale of investment relating to the sale of its remaining
stock in PokerTek, Inc. (PokerTek).
Income taxes. The provision for income taxes
was $0.5 million and $2.2 million for the three months
ended September 30, 2007 and October 1, 2006,
respectively. Our effective income tax rates were (8%) and 35%
for the third quarter of 2007 and the corresponding period of
2006, respectively. In the current year period, the provision
consisted primarily of Lakes interest expense on the
Louisiana state income tax dispute and the IRS tax matter. The
prior year period provision consisted of $0.3 million
related to Lakes and $1.9 million related to WPTE. The
prior year period provision for Lakes consisted primarily of
interest expense on the Louisiana state income tax dispute and
the IRS tax matter. WPTEs prior year period provision was
due to positive taxable income that WPTE expected to generate
during 2006, which resulted from the sale of its interest in
PokerTek.
Minority interest. The minority interest in
WPTEs earnings (loss) was approximately
($0.9) million and $1.0 million for the three months
ended September 30, 2007 and October 1, 2006,
respectively. WPTEs net earnings (loss) were
($2.2) million and $2.7 million for the three months
ended September 30, 2007 and October 1, 2006,
respectively.
Nine
months ended September 30, 2007 compared to the nine months
ended October 1, 2006
Revenues. Total revenues decreased by
$3.6 million during the nine months ended
September 30, 2007 compared to the nine months ended
October 1, 2006. Domestic television licensing revenues
decreased $5.3 million in the first nine months of 2007
compared to the 2006 period. The decrease was primarily the
result of the delivery of 17 episodes of Season Five of the WPT
television series in the first nine months of 2007 versus 16
episodes of Season Four of the WPT and 19 episodes of the PPT
delivered in the 2006 period. International television licensing
revenues decreased by $0.5 million as a result of fewer
distribution agreements in the international marketplace.
Product licensing revenues increased by approximately
$0.2 million in the first nine months of 2007 compared to
the 2006 period. The increase was primarily due to higher
interactive gaming revenues from Take Two. Online gaming
revenues decreased $1.7 million primarily due to lower
levels of player activity versus the prior year period, as well
as WPTE ceasing operations on the WagerWorks network in June
while transitioning WPTEs online gaming operation to
CryptoLogic. Event hosting and sponsorship revenues increased
$0.6 million due primarily to PartyGaming sponsorship
revenues that did not exist in the same period in 2006.
Lakes casino management fees were $3.4 million during
the first nine months of 2007 and primarily related to fees from
the management of the Four Winds Casino Resort and the Cimarron
Casino. Lakes casino management fees during the first nine
months of 2006 primarily related to fees from the management of
the Cimarron Casino.
Selling, general and administrative
expense. Selling, general and administrative
expense increased approximately $3.0 million in the first
nine months of 2007 compared to the 2006 period. The increase
primarily related to WPTEs efforts to develop their own
online gaming software and support infrastructure prior to
entering into an agreement with CryptoLogic, as well as costs
associated with WPT China.
Production costs. Production costs decreased
by approximately $1.7 million in the first nine months of
2007 compared to the 2006 period. The decrease was primarily a
result of a decrease in production costs of $1.3 million as
WPTE delivered fewer episodes in the 2007 period versus the 2006
period, as noted above. Additionally, online gaming costs of
revenues decreased $0.8 million in the first nine months of
2007 versus the 2006 period due to lower revenues. The decreased
costs were offset by higher costs of $0.4 million related
to PartyGaming sponsorship
24
revenues. Overall gross margins for WPTE were 60% in the first
nine months of 2007 compared to 64% in the first nine months of
2006. Domestic television licensing margins were 41% in the
first nine months of 2007 compared to 55% in the same period in
2006. This decrease was principally because of the delivery of
19 episodes of WPTEs PPT series in 2006 for which the
production costs had been expensed in an earlier period. In
addition, online gaming contributed to the overall lower margin
in the first nine months of 2007 as a result of an amendment of
the agreement with WagerWorks that was effective in July of
2006, which significantly increased the percentage of revenues
paid to it.
Loss on abandonment of online gaming
assets. During the second quarter of 2007, WPTE
wrote off approximately $2.3 million in online gaming
assets as a result of ceasing development of the stand-alone
online gaming platform WPTE was developing based on the
CyberArts software.
Impairment losses. We recognized a
$0.3 million impairment charge in the first quarter of 2007
related to the Trading Post casino project with the Pawnee
Tribal Development Corporation (Pawnee TDC). The
Pawnee TDC, together with its three wholly-owned subsidiaries,
are referred to collectively as the Pawnee Nation.
No impairment losses were recognized during the nine months
ended October 1, 2006.
Amortization of intangible assets related to Indian casino
projects. Amortization of intangible assets
related to Indian casino projects was $1.1 million for the
nine months ended September 30, 2007. This amortization
related primarily to the intangible assets associated with the
Four Winds Casino Resort, which began when it opened to the
public on August 2, 2007. There was no amortization of
intangible assets related to the Indian casino projects for the
nine months ended October 1, 2006.
Net realized and unrealized gains on notes
receivable. Net realized and unrealized gains on
notes receivable were $8.5 million and $38.9 million
for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and
October 1, 2006, respectively. The net realized and
unrealized gains in the first nine months of 2007 related
primarily to our notes receivable from the Shingle Springs Tribe
which are adjusted to estimated fair value based upon the
current status of the tribal casino project. The unrealized
gains associated with notes receivable from the Shingle Springs
Tribe were the result of the close of third party financing by
the Shingle Springs Tribe in June of 2007, which resulted in an
increased probability of opening of the casino development
project with the Shingle Springs Tribe. The result was an
unrealized gain of approximately $7.9 million during the
nine months ended September 30, 2007.
During the first nine months of 2006, unrealized gains of
approximately $33.5 million related primarily to the
increased probability of opening related to the casino
development projects with the Pokagon Band, Jamul Tribe and with
the Shingle Springs Tribe as well as the increased interest rate
charged on the notes with the Jamul Tribe as a result of the
development financing and services agreement entered into on
March 30, 2006 with the Jamul Tribe, along with a
retroactive interest rate adjustment on the Pokagon Band loans.
In addition, we recognized gains of approximately
$5.4 million related to a note receivable repayment and
liability releases received from various venders related to the
settlement with the Kickapoo Traditional Tribe of Texas.
Other income (expense). Other income for the
first nine months of 2007 was $3.1 million compared to
$0.2 million for the first nine months of 2006. In
conjunction with the close of the Shingle Springs Tribes
$450 million senior note financing, the Shingle Springs
Tribe repaid us for land we had previously purchased on its
behalf and the related accrued interest. The repayment resulted
in interest income of approximately $4.9 million in June of
2007. In March 2007, Lakes contracted with a group of investors
for their participation in the loans made by Lakes to the
Pokagon Band (and assumed by the Pokagon Gaming Authority) at an
agreed upon price of 98% of the face value of the loans as of
the settlement date of March 2, 2007. This participation
arrangement was accounted for as a sale during 2007. Lakes
then existing $105 million Credit Agreement was repaid with
proceeds from the Pokagon notes receivable participation
transaction. This repayment resulted in a loss on extinguishment
of debt of approximately $3.8 million during March of 2007.
In the second quarter of 2006, we refinanced substantially all
of our long-term debt. As a result, we wrote-off the unamortized
portion of the debt discount related to the issuance of common
stock warrants ($4.3 million) as well as unamortized
closing costs ($2.5 million), resulting in a loss on
extinguishment of debt of approximately $6.8 million. This
activity was offset by a WPTE gain on sale of securities of
approximately $10.2 million related to a sale of
WPTEs shares of common stock of PokerTek.
25
Income taxes. The provision for income taxes
was $1.1 million and $8.7 million for the nine months
ended September 30, 2007 and October 1, 2006,
respectively. Our effective income tax rates were (13%) and 32%
for the first nine months of 2007 and the corresponding period
of 2006, respectively. In the current year period, the provision
primarily related to interest charges on the Louisiana state
income tax dispute and the IRS tax matter.
In the prior year period, the provision consisted of
$5.2 million related to Lakes and $3.5 million related
to WPTE. Lakes provision included approximately
$2.0 million related to an IRS audit matter and
$2.0 million related to the reversal of deferred tax assets
related to the losses that were reversed during the period
related to the Kickapoo Traditional Tribe of Texas. The
remainder of Lakes provision primarily consisted of
interest charges on the Louisiana state income tax dispute.
WPTEs prior year period provision was due to positive
taxable income that WPTE expected to generate during 2006, which
resulted from the sale of its interest in PokerTek.
Minority interest. The minority interest in
WPTEs earnings (loss) was approximately
($3.0) million and $3.4 million for the nine months
ended September 30, 2007 and October 1, 2006,
respectively. WPTEs net earnings (loss) were
($7.8) million and $8.8 million for the nine months
ended September 30, 2007 and October 1, 2006,
respectively.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
At September 30, 2007, our Unaudited Condensed Consolidated
Balance Sheet included cash and cash equivalents and short-term
investment balances of $59.5 million, comprised of Lakes
cash of $3.4 million, Lakes short-term investments of
$30.2 million, WPTE cash of $4.5 million and WPTE
short-term investments of $21.4 million. WPTE cash and
short-term investments will not be used in Lakes business.
Lakes expects that cash, cash equivalents and investments in
marketable securities on hand and generated from operations will
be sufficient to fund our working capital requirements for at
least the next twelve months.
WPTE also expects that cash, cash equivalents and investments in
marketable securities on hand and generated from operations will
be sufficient to fund WPTEs working capital and
capital expenditure requirements for at least the next twelve
months.
Lakes major use of cash over the past three years has been
pre-construction financing provided to our tribal partners and
on-going corporate costs.
Lakes agreements with tribal partners require that we
provide certain financing for project development in the form of
loans. These loans are interest bearing; however, the loans and
related interest are not due until the casino is built and has
established profitable operations. In the event that the casinos
are not built, our only recourse is to attempt to liquidate
assets of the development, if any, excluding any land in trust.
Lakes cash forecast requirements do not include
construction-related costs that will be incurred when projects
begin construction. The construction of our casino projects will
depend on the ability of the tribes
and/or Lakes
to obtain financing for the projects. If such financing cannot
be obtained on acceptable terms, it may not be possible to
complete these projects, which could have a material adverse
effect on our results of operations and financial condition. In
order to assist the tribes, we may be required to guarantee the
tribes debt financing or otherwise provide support for the
tribes obligations. Guarantees by us, if any, will
increase our potential exposure in the event of a default by any
of these tribes.
We believe that our casino development projects currently in
progress will be constructed and ultimately, along with those
currently operating, will achieve profitable operations;
however, no assurance can be made that this will occur. If this
does not occur, it is likely that we would incur substantial or
complete losses on our notes receivable from Indian tribes and
related intangible assets associated with the acquisition of the
management, development, consulting and financing contracts. In
addition, if our casino development projects currently in
progress are not completed or, upon completion, fail to
successfully compete in the highly competitive market for gaming
activities, we may lack the funds to compete for and develop
future gaming or other business opportunities and our business
could be adversely affected to the extent that we may be forced
to cease our operations entirely.
26
Following is a table summarizing remaining contractual
obligations as of September 30, 2007 (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payment due by period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
More than
|
|
Contractual obligations
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1 year
|
|
|
1-3 years
|
|
|
3-5 years
|
|
|
5 years
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
Remaining casino development commitment(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jamul Tribe(2)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Shingle Springs Tribe(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pokagon Band(4)
|
|
|
9.8
|
|
|
|
1.9
|
|
|
|
3.8
|
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
Iowa Tribe Ioway Project(5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lakes operating lease(6)
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lakes FIN 48 liability(7)
|
|
|
4.3
|
|
|
|
4.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WPTE operating leases(8)
|
|
|
3.3
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
|
1.8
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
WPTE purchase obligations(9)
|
|
|
2.7
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
20.6
|
|
|
$
|
8.9
|
|
|
$
|
6.9
|
|
|
$
|
4.8
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
We may be required to provide a guarantee of tribal debt
financing or otherwise provide support for the tribal
obligations related to any of the projects (see (2),
(3) and (5) below). Any guarantees by us or similar
off-balance sheet liabilities will increase our potential
exposure in the event of a default by any of these tribes. No
such guarantees or similar off-balance sheet liabilities exist
at September 30, 2007. |
|
(2) |
|
Effective March 30, 2006, we entered into a development
financing and services agreement with the Jamul Tribe. As part
of the agreement, we will use our best efforts to obtain
financing from which advances will be made to the Jamul Tribe of
up to $350 million to pay for the design and construction
of a casino project. It has been determined that the proposed
gaming facility will be reduced in size and scope. The current
plan is for the gaming facility to decrease in size and become a
solely class II electronic gaming device facility which
will not require a compact with the state of California. The
agreement between Lakes and the Jamul Tribe is being modified to
reflect the new economics of the revised casino plan but will
not be subject to approval by the State of California or the
NIGC. |
|
(3) |
|
The development agreement between Lakes and the Shingle Springs
Tribe, as amended, provides for pre-construction advances Lakes
may make to the Shingle Springs Tribe in the form of a
transition loan and land loan up to a maximum combined amount of
$75.0 million, but it does not contractually require us to
make such advances. |
|
(4) |
|
We are obligated to pay approximately $11 million to an
unrelated third party now that the Four Winds Casino Resort is
open and we are the manager of the casino. The payment is
payable quarterly for five years and is only payable if we are
the manager and the casino is open and operational. The payment
is part of a settlement and release agreement associated with
our obtaining the management contract with the Pokagon Band. We
are also obligated to pay approximately $3 million over
24 months to a separate unrelated third party on behalf of
the Pokagon Band in accordance with the management contract
which commenced when the casino opened. These obligations do not
have a stated interest rate and have payments terms which extend
beyond one fiscal year. As a result, these obligations have been
recorded at their net present value and the difference between
the face amount and the net present value of the obligations is
recorded as a discount, which is amortized to interest expense
as the payments are made pursuant to the respective agreement. |
|
(5) |
|
We have agreed to make advances to the Iowa Tribe subject to a
project budget to be agreed upon by us and the Iowa Tribe and
certain other conditions. The development loan will be for
preliminary development costs under the Ioway project budget. We
have also agreed to use reasonable efforts to assist the Iowa
Tribe in obtaining permanent financing for any projects
developed under the Iowa consulting agreement. |
|
(6) |
|
We lease an airplane under a non-cancelable operating lease that
expires on May 1, 2008. |
|
(7) |
|
We believe it is reasonably possible that, within the next
12 months, we could be required to pay up to approximately
$3.2 million plus accrued interest related to an IRS tax
matter. |
27
|
|
|
(8) |
|
WPTE operating lease obligations include rent payments for WPTE
corporate offices pursuant to two lease agreements. For the
first lease, monthly lease payments began at approximately
$38,000 and escalate to approximately $45,000 over the six-year
lease term. For the second lease, monthly payments began at
approximately $28,000 and escalate up to approximately $33,000
over the five-year lease term. The amounts set forth in the
table above include monthly lease payments through June 2011. |
|
(9) |
|
WPTE purchase obligations include minimum guarantees to
CryptoLogic and operational expenses associated with WPTEs
online gaming division, as well as a $0.5 million annual
payment to the CLSAC for exclusive marketing and sponsorship
opportunities in China (the table does not include commitments
for years two through five, as the agreement terminates for
failure of payment). Additionally, included in purchase
obligations are open purchase orders of approximately
$0.5 million as of September 30, 2007. These
liabilities are included in Other Accrued Expenses within the
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. |
We have incurred cumulative development and land development
costs of approximately $6.4 million and $2.9 million,
respectively, relating to the development of a Company-owned
non-Indian casino in Vicksburg, Mississippi. These costs are
included in property and equipment as construction in progress
and land, respectively. We have received various regulatory
approvals to develop our own casino near Vicksburg, Mississippi.
Lakes does not expect to pursue further development of this
project until 2008.
Critical
Accounting Policies and Estimates
This Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations discusses our unaudited
condensed consolidated financial statements which have been
prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted
accounting principles. The preparation of these financial
statements requires us to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the balance
sheet date and reported amounts of revenue and expenses during
the reporting period. On an ongoing basis, we evaluate our
estimates and judgments, including those related to revenue
recognition, long-term assets related to Indian casino projects,
deferred television costs, investments, litigation costs, income
taxes, share-based compensation and derivative financial
instruments. We base our estimates and judgments on historical
experience and on various other factors that are reasonable
under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for
making judgments about the carrying values of assets and
liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources.
Actual results may differ from these estimates.
We believe the following critical accounting policies involve
the more significant judgments and estimates used in the
preparation of our unaudited condensed consolidated financial
statements.
Revenue recognition. Revenue from the
management of Indian-owned casino gaming facilities is
recognized in accordance with our policy described below under
the caption Accounting for long-term assets related to
Indian casino projects.
Revenue from the domestic and international distribution of WPTE
television series is recognized as earned under the following
criteria established by the American Institute of Certified
Public Accountants Statement of Position (SOP)
No. 00-2,
Accounting by Producers or Distributors of Films
(SOP 00-2):
|
|
|
|
|
Persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists;
|
|
|
|
The show/episode is complete, and in accordance with the terms
of the arrangement, has been delivered or is available for
immediate and unconditional delivery;
|
|
|
|
The license period has begun and the customer can begin its
exploitation, exhibition or sale;
|
|
|
|
The sellers price to the buyer is fixed and
determinable; and
|
|
|
|
Collectibility is reasonably assured.
|
In accordance with the terms of the TRV Agreements, WPTE
recognizes domestic television license revenues upon the receipt
and acceptance of completed episodes. However, due to
restrictions and practical limitations applicable to WPTEs
operating relationships with foreign networks, WPTE currently
does not consider collectibility of international television
license revenues to be reasonably assured, and accordingly, WPTE
does not
28
recognize such revenue until the distributor has received
payment. Additionally, WPTE presents international distribution
license fee revenues net of the distributors fees, as the
distributor is the primary obligor in the transaction with the
ultimate customer pursuant to Emerging Issues Task Force
(EITF)
99-19,
Reporting Revenue Gross as a Principal versus Net as an
Agent
(EITF 99-19).
Product licensing revenues are recognized when the underlying
royalties from the sales of the related products are earned.
WPTE recognizes minimum revenue guarantees ratably over the term
of the license or as earned royalties based on actual sales of
the related products, if greater. WPTE presents product
licensing fees gross of licensing commissions, which are
recorded as selling and administrative expenses because WPTE is
the primary obligor in the transaction with the ultimate
customer pursuant to
EITF 99-19.
Online gaming revenues are recognized monthly based on detailed
statements received from CryptoLogic, WPTEs online gaming
service provider, for online poker and casino activity during
the previous month. In accordance with
EITF 99-19,
WPTE presents online gaming revenues gross of the service
provider costs (including the service providers management
fee, royalties and credit card processing fees that are recorded
as cost of revenues) because WPTE has the ability to adjust
price and specifications of the online gaming site, WPTE bears
the majority of the credit risk and WPTE is responsible for the
sales and marketing of the gaming site. WPTE includes certain
promotional expenses related to free bets and deposit bonuses
along with customer chargebacks as deductions of revenue. All
other promotional expenses are generally recorded as sales and
marketing expenses.
Event hosting fees are paid by host casinos for the privilege of
hosting the events and are recognized as the episodes that
feature the host casino are aired. Sponsorship revenues are
recognized as the episodes that feature the sponsor are aired.
Licensing advances and guaranteed payments collected, but not
yet earned, by WPTE, as well as casino host fees and sponsorship
receipts collected prior to the airing of episodes, are
classified as deferred revenue in the accompanying balance
sheets.
Deferred television costs. WPTE
accounts for deferred television costs in accordance with
SOP 00-2.
Deferred television costs include capitalizable direct costs,
production overhead and development costs and are stated at the
lower of cost or net realizable value based on anticipated
revenue. WPTE has not currently anticipated any revenues in
excess of those subject to existing contractual relationships,
because WPTE has insufficient operating history to enable such
anticipation. Marketing, distribution and general and
administrative costs are expensed as incurred. Capitalized
television production costs for each episode are expensed as
revenues are recognized upon delivery and acceptance by TRV of
the completed episode. WPTEs management currently
estimates that 41% of the approximately $1.7 million in
capitalized deferred television costs at September 30, 2007
are expected to be expensed in connection with episode
deliveries by the end of fiscal 2007.
Share-based compensation expense. We
measure share-based compensation expense pursuant to the
Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB)
SFAS No. 123(R), which requires companies to estimate
the fair value of share-based payment awards on the date of
grant using an option-pricing model. The value of the portion of
the award that is ultimately expected to vest is recognized as
expense over the requisite service periods in our Unaudited
Condensed Consolidated Statement of Earnings (Loss) and
Comprehensive Earnings (Loss).
We use the Black-Scholes option pricing method to establish fair
value of options. Our determination of fair value of share-based
payment awards on the date of grant using an option-pricing
model is affected by our stock price as well as assumptions
regarding a number of highly complex and subjective variables.
These variables include, but are not limited to our expected
stock price volatility and actual and projected employee stock
option exercise behaviors. Any changes in these assumptions may
materially affect the estimated fair value of the share-based
award.
Income taxes. We include interest expense relative
to uncertain income tax matters in our income tax provision. In
accordance with SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income
Taxes we evaluated the ability to utilize deferred tax
assets arising from net operating loss carryforwards, and other
ordinary items and determined that a valuation allowance was
appropriate at September 30, 2007 and December 31,
2006. We evaluated all evidence and determined net losses
(excluding net realized and unrealized gains and losses on notes
receivable) generated over the past five years outweighed the
current positive evidence that we believe exists surrounding our
ability to
29
generate significant income from our long-term assets related to
Indian casino projects. Therefore, we have recorded a 100%
valuation allowance against these items at September 30,
2007, and December 31, 2006.
We have recorded deferred tax assets related to capital losses.
The realization of these benefits is dependent on the generation
of capital gains during the applicable carryforward periods. We
believe we will have sufficient capital gains in the foreseeable
future to utilize these benefits due to significant appreciation
in our investment in WPTE, which has a minimal cost basis and
could be sold at a substantial gain. We own approximately
12.5 million shares of WPTE common stock valued at
approximately $36 million as of September 30, 2007
based upon the closing stock price as reported by NASDAQ on
September 28, 2007 of $2.88.
WPTEs current growth plans include international expansion
primarily related to WPTEs online gaming business and
activities in China, and expansion of television and product
licensing businesses, and entry into new branded gaming
businesses. Although WPTE anticipates that all potential
strategies will be accretive to earnings, WPTE is aware of the
risks involved with an aggressive growth strategy. Therefore,
based on WPTEs limited and volatile earnings history
combined with WPTEs cautious optimism, WPTE has determined
that a valuation allowance is necessary to the extent that
management currently believes it is more likely than not that
tax assets will not be recovered in the foreseeable future.
A discussion of the effects of adopting FASB Interpretation
No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes
in the first quarter of fiscal 2007 is included in
Note 8.
Long-term assets related to Indian casino projects:
Notes receivable. We have formal procedures
governing our evaluation of opportunities for potential
development projects that we follow before entering into
agreements to provide financial support for the development of
these Indian owned casino projects. We determine whether there
is probable future economic benefit prior to recording any asset
related to the Indian casino project. We initially evaluate the
following factors involving critical milestones that affect the
probability of developing and operating a casino:
|
|
|
|
|
Has the U.S. Governments Bureau of Indian Affairs
federally recognized the tribe as a tribe?
|
|
|
|
Does the tribe hold or have the right to acquire land to be
used for the casino site?
|
|
|
|
Has the Department of the Interior put the land into trust
for purposes of being used as a casino site?
|
|
|
|
Has the tribe entered into a gaming agreement with the state
in which the land is located, if required by the state?
|
|
|
|
Has the tribe obtained approval by the National Indian Gaming
Commission of the management agreement?
|
|
|
|
Do other legal and political obstacles exist that could block
development of the project and, if so, what is the likelihood of
the tribe successfully prevailing?
|
|
|
|
An evaluation by management of the financial projections of
the project given the projects geographic location and the
feasibility of the projects success given such
location;
|
|
|
|
The structure and stability of the tribal government;
|
|
|
|
The scope of the proposed project, including the physical
scope of the contemplated facility and the expected financial
scope of the related development;
|
|
|
|
An evaluation of the proposed projects ability to be
built as contemplated and the likelihood that financing will be
available; and
|
|
|
|
The nature of the business opportunity to us, including
whether the project would be a financing, development
and/or
management opportunity.
|
We account for our notes receivable from and service contracts
with the tribes as separate assets. The estimated fair value of
the advances made to the tribes are accounted for as
in-substance structured notes in accordance with the guidance
contained in Emerging Issues Task Force Consensus
No. 96-12,
Recognition of Interest Income and Balance Sheet
Classification of Structured Notes (EITF
No. 96-12).
Under their terms, the notes do not become
30
due and payable unless and until the projects are completed and
operational. However, in the event our development activity is
terminated prior to completion, we generally retain the right to
collect in the event of completion by another developer. Because
the stated rate of the notes receivable alone is not
commensurate with the risk inherent in these projects (at least
prior to commencement of operations), the estimated fair value
of the notes receivable is generally less than the amount
advanced. Costs incurred related to Indian casino projects are
not considered advanced to the tribe until actually paid by us.
At the date of each advance, the difference between the
estimated fair value of the note receivable and the actual
amount advanced is recorded as an intangible asset.
Subsequent to its initial recording at estimated fair value, the
note receivable portion of the advance is adjusted to its
current estimated fair value at each balance sheet date using
then current assumptions including typical market discount
rates, and expected repayment terms as may be affected by
estimated future interest rates and opening dates, with the
latter affected by changes in project-specific circumstances
such as ongoing litigation, the status of regulatory approvals
and other factors previously noted. The notes receivable are not
adjusted to a fair value estimate that exceeds the face value of
the note plus accrued interest, if any. Due to uncertainties
surrounding the projects, no interest income is recognized
during the development period, but changes in estimated fair
value of the notes receivable still held as of the balance sheet
date are recorded as unrealized gains or losses in our Unaudited
Condensed Statement of Earnings (Loss) and Comprehensive
Earnings (Loss).
Upon opening of the casino, any difference between the then
estimated fair value of the notes receivable and the amount
contractually due under the notes will be amortized into income
using the effective interest method over the remaining term of
the note. Such notes would then be evaluated for impairment
pursuant to Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No. 114, Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a
Loan.
Intangible assets related to Indian casino
projects. Intangible assets related to the
acquisition of the management, development, consulting or
financing contracts are accounted for using the guidance in
SFAS No. 142 Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
(SFAS No. 142). Pursuant to that
guidance, the assets are periodically evaluated for impairment
based on the estimated cash flows from the contract on an
undiscounted basis. In the event the carrying value of the
intangible assets, in combination with the carrying value of
land held for development and other assets associated with the
Indian casino projects described below, were to exceed the
undiscounted cash flow, an impairment would be recorded. Such an
impairment would be measured based on the difference between the
fair value and carrying value of the assets. In accordance with
SFAS No. 142, we amortize the intangible assets
related to the acquisition of the management, development,
consulting or financing contracts under the straight-line method
over the lives of the contracts which will commence when the
related casinos open. In addition to the intangible asset
associated with the cash advances to tribes described above,
these assets include actual costs incurred to acquire our
interest in the projects from third parties.
Land held for development. Included in land
held for development is land held for possible transfer to
Indian tribes for use in certain of the future casino resort
projects. In the event that this land is not transferred to the
tribes, we can sell it. We evaluate these assets for impairment
in combination with intangible assets related to acquisition of
management, development, consulting or financing contracts and
other assets related to the Indian casino projects as discussed
above.
Other. Included in this category are costs
incurred related to the Indian casino projects which have not
yet been included as part of the notes receivable because of
timing of the payment of these costs. When paid, these amounts
are allocated between notes receivable and intangible assets
related to the acquisition of management, development,
consulting or financing contracts and will be evaluated for
changes in fair value or impairment, respectively, as described
above. These amounts vary from period to period due to timing of
payment of these costs. Also included in this category are
receivables from related parties that are directly related to
the development and opening of Lakes Indian casino
projects.
In addition, we incur certain costs related to the projects that
are not included in notes receivable, which are expensed as
incurred. These costs include salaries, travel and certain legal
costs.
31
As of September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, the
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets include
long-term assets related to Indian casino projects of
$159.4 million and $243.8 million, respectively. The
amounts are as follows by project (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shingle
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pokagon
|
|
|
Springs
|
|
|
Jamul
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band
|
|
|
Tribe
|
|
|
Tribe
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
Notes receivable, at estimated fair value
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
52,176
|
|
|
$
|
23,616
|
|
|
$
|
3,486
|
|
|
$
|
79,278
|
|
Land held for development
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,751
|
|
|
|
846
|
|
|
|
7,597
|
|
Intangible assets related to Indian casino projects, net
|
|
|
32,454
|
|
|
|
21,812
|
|
|
|
11,556
|
|
|
|
1,120
|
|
|
|
66,942
|
|
Other
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
767
|
|
|
|
1,016
|
|
|
|
3,772
|
|
|
|
5,615
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
32,514
|
|
|
$
|
74,755
|
|
|
$
|
42,939
|
|
|
$
|
9,224
|
|
|
$
|
159,432
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shingle
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pokagon
|
|
|
Springs
|
|
|
Jamul
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band
|
|
|
Tribe
|
|
|
Tribe
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Notes receivable, at estimated fair value
|
|
$
|
100,544
|
|
|
$
|
40,912
|
|
|
$
|
20,754
|
|
|
$
|
2,098
|
|
|
$
|
164,308
|
|
Land held for development
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,739
|
|
|
|
6,710
|
|
|
|
1,341
|
|
|
|
16,790
|
|
Intangible assets related to Indian casino projects, net
|
|
|
23,573
|
|
|
|
20,387
|
|
|
|
9,760
|
|
|
|
559
|
|
|
|
54,279
|
|
Other
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
2,041
|
|
|
|
2,207
|
|
|
|
4,142
|
|
|
|
8,450
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
124,177
|
|
|
$
|
72,079
|
|
|
$
|
39,431
|
|
|
$
|
8,140
|
|
|
$
|
243,827
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The key assumptions and criteria used in the determination of
the estimated fair value of the notes receivable are estimated
casino opening date, projected interest rates, discount rates
and probability of projects opening. The estimated casino
opening date used in the valuation reflects the weighted-average
of three scenarios: a base case (which is based on our
forecasted casino opening date) and one and two years out from
the base case. The projected interest rates are based upon the
one year U.S. Treasury Bill spot yield curve per Bloomberg
and the specific assumptions on contract term, stated interest
rate and casino opening date. The discount rate for the projects
is based on the yields available on certain financial
instruments at the valuation date, the risk level of equity
investments in general, and the specific operating risks
associated with open and operating gaming enterprises similar to
each of the projects. In estimating this discount rate, market
data of other public gaming related companies is considered. The
probability applied to each project is based upon a weighting of
four different scenarios with the fourth scenario assuming the
casino never opens. The first three scenarios assume the casino
opens but applies different opening dates as discussed above.
The probability weighting applied to each scenario captures the
element of risk in these projects and is based upon the status
of each project, review of the critical milestones and
likelihood of achieving the milestones.
32
The following table provides the key assumptions used to value
the notes receivable at estimated fair value (dollars in
thousands):
Shingle Springs Tribe:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, 2007
|
|
As of December 31, 2006
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
Face value of note (principal and interest)
|
|
$65,460
|
|
$55,942
|
|
|
($47,068 principal and $18,392 interest)
|
|
($42,310 principal and $13,632 interest)
|
Estimated months until casino opens (weighted-average of three
scenarios)
|
|
15 months
|
|
28 months
|
Projected interest rate until casino opens
|
|
9.67%
|
|
9.98%
|
Projected interest rate during the loan repayment term
|
|
10.28%
|
|
9.76%
|
Discount rate
|
|
15%
|
|
15%
|
Repayment terms of note(*)
|
|
84 months
|
|
|
Projected repayment terms of note (**)
|
|
|
|
24 months
|
Probability rate of casino opening (weighting of four scenarios)
|
|
95%
|
|
85%
|
|
|
|
(*) |
|
Note is payable in even monthly installments over the course of
the management agreement subsequent to the casino opening. |
|
(**) |
|
Note was previously payable in varying monthly installments
based on contract terms subsequent to the casino opening. |
See discussion included below under Description of each
Indian casino project and evaluation of critical
milestones Shingle Springs.
Jamul
Tribe:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, 2007
|
|
As of December 31, 2006
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
Face value of note (principal and interest)
|
|
$40,591
|
|
$32,952
|
|
|
($29,278 principal and $11,313 interest)
|
|
($24,509 principal and $8,443 interest)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated months until casino opens (weighted-average of three
scenarios)
|
|
29 months
|
|
29 months
|
Projected interest rate until casino opens
|
|
9.67%
|
|
9.98%
|
Projected interest rate during the loan repayment term
|
|
10.49%
|
|
9.76%
|
Discount rate
|
|
17.50%
|
|
15.75%
|
Projected repayment terms of note
|
|
120 months
|
|
120 months
|
Probability rate of casino opening (weighting of four scenarios)
|
|
85%
|
|
85%
|
See discussion below included under the caption
Description of each Indian casino project and evaluation
of critical milestones Jamul Tribe.
33
The following table represents a sensitivity analysis prepared
by us of the notes receivable from the Jamul Tribe and Shingle
Springs Tribe, based upon a change in the probability rate of
the casino opening by five percentage points and the estimated
casino opening date by one year (probability will not be
adjusted in excess of 100%):
September 30,
2007 (unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated fair
|
|
|
Sensitivity analysis
|
|
|
|
value notes
|
|
|
5% less
|
|
|
One year
|
|
|
|
|
|
5% increased
|
|
|
One year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
receivable
|
|
|
probable
|
|
|
delay
|
|
|
Both
|
|
|
probability
|
|
|
sooner
|
|
|
Both
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Shingle Springs
|
|
$
|
52,176
|
|
|
$
|
49,411
|
|
|
$
|
49,942
|
|
|
$
|
47,294
|
|
|
$
|
54,941
|
|
|
$
|
54,509
|
|
|
$
|
57,398
|
|
Jamul
|
|
|
23,616
|
|
|
|
22,231
|
|
|
|
22,135
|
|
|
|
20,837
|
|
|
|
25,001
|
|
|
|
25,196
|
|
|
|
26,675
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
75,792
|
|
|
$
|
71,642
|
|
|
$
|
72,077
|
|
|
$
|
68,131
|
|
|
$
|
79,942
|
|
|
$
|
79,705
|
|
|
$
|
84,073
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated fair
|
|
|
Sensitivity analysis
|
|
|
|
value notes
|
|
|
5% less
|
|
|
One year
|
|
|
|
|
|
5% increased
|
|
|
One year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
receivable
|
|
|
probable
|
|
|
delay
|
|
|
Both
|
|
|
probability
|
|
|
sooner
|
|
|
Both
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Shingle Springs
|
|
$
|
40,912
|
|
|
$
|
38,469
|
|
|
$
|
39,269
|
|
|
$
|
36,923
|
|
|
$
|
43,355
|
|
|
$
|
42,623
|
|
|
$
|
45,166
|
|
Jamul
|
|
|
20,754
|
|
|
|
19,548
|
|
|
|
19,815
|
|
|
|
18,664
|
|
|
|
21,960
|
|
|
|
21,738
|
|
|
|
23,002
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
61,666
|
|
|
$
|
58,017
|
|
|
$
|
59,084
|
|
|
$
|
55,587
|
|
|
$
|
65,315
|
|
|
$
|
64,361
|
|
|
$
|
68,168
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The assumption changes used in the sensitivity analysis above
are hypothetical. The effect of the variation in the probability
assumption and estimated opening date on the estimated fair
value of the notes receivable from Indian tribes was calculated
without changing any other assumptions; in reality, changes in
these factors may result in changes in another. For example, the
change in probability could be associated with a change in
discount rate, which might magnify or counteract the
sensitivities.
The following table represents the nature of the advances to the
tribes. The table represents the total amount of advances, which
represent the principal amount of the notes receivable, as of
September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006. The notes
receivable are carried on the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated
Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2007 and
December 31, 2006 at their estimated fair values of
$79.3 million and $63.8 million, respectively.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
Shingle
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advances Principal Balance
|
|
Springs
|
|
|
Jamul
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Note receivable, pre-construction(a),(c)
|
|
$
|
47,068
|
|
|
$
|
28,328
|
|
|
$
|
3,031
|
|
|
$
|
78,427
|
|
Note receivable, land(b),(c)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
950
|
|
|
|
973
|
|
|
|
1,923
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
47,068
|
|
|
$
|
29,278
|
|
|
$
|
4,004
|
|
|
$
|
80,350
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
Shingle
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advances Principal Balance
|
|
Springs
|
|
|
Jamul
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Note receivable, pre-construction(a),(c)
|
|
$
|
42,310
|
|
|
$
|
23,559
|
|
|
$
|
1,386
|
|
|
$
|
67,255
|
|
Note receivable, land(b),(c)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
950
|
|
|
|
756
|
|
|
|
1,706
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
42,310
|
|
|
$
|
24,509
|
|
|
$
|
2,142
|
|
|
$
|
68,961
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
We fund certain costs incurred to develop the casino project.
These costs relate to construction costs, legal fees in
connection with various regulatory approvals and litigation,
environmental costs and design consulting, and |
34
|
|
|
|
|
we, in order to obtain the development agreement and management
contract, agree to advance a monthly amount used by the tribe
for a variety of tribal expenses. |
|
(b) |
|
We purchased land to be used and transferred to the tribe in
connection with the casino project. |
|
(c) |
|
Amounts listed under the other column represent amounts advanced
under the agreements with the Iowa Tribe. |
The notes receivable pre-construction advances consist of the
following principal amounts advanced to the Shingle Springs
Tribe and Jamul Tribe at September 30, 2007 and
December 31, 2006 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
Shingle Springs Tribe
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Monthly stipend
|
|
$
|
9,290
|
|
|
$
|
7,690
|
|
Construction
|
|
|
1,922
|
|
|
|
1,657
|
|
Legal
|
|
|
14,193
|
|
|
|
13,790
|
|
Environmental
|
|
|
1,739
|
|
|
|
1,680
|
|
Design
|
|
|
11,230
|
|
|
|
9,554
|
|
Gaming license
|
|
|
3,726
|
|
|
|
3,626
|
|
Lobbyist
|
|
|
4,968
|
|
|
|
4,313
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
47,068
|
|
|
$
|
42,310
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
Jamul Tribe
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Monthly stipend
|
|
$
|
4,915
|
|
|
$
|
4,451
|
|
Construction
|
|
|
1,091
|
|
|
|
649
|
|
Legal
|
|
|
4,272
|
|
|
|
3,675
|
|
Environmental
|
|
|
2,272
|
|
|
|
1,985
|
|
Design
|
|
|
12,343
|
|
|
|
9,578
|
|
Gaming license
|
|
|
745
|
|
|
|
641
|
|
Lobbyist
|
|
|
2,690
|
|
|
|
2,580
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
28,328
|
|
|
$
|
23,559
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Evaluation
of impairment related to our long-term assets related to Indian
casino projects, excluding the notes receivable, which are
valued at fair value:
Management periodically evaluates the intangible assets, land
held for development and other costs associated with each of the
projects for impairment. The assets are periodically evaluated
for impairment based on the estimated undiscounted cash flows
from the management contract on an undiscounted basis. In the
event the carrying value of the intangible assets, in
combination with the carrying value of land held for development
and other assets associated with the Indian casino projects were
to exceed the undiscounted cash flow, an impairment would be
recorded. Such impairment would be measured based on the
difference between the fair value and carrying value of the
assets.
The financial models prepared by management for each project are
based upon the scope of each of the projects, which are
supported by a feasibility study as well as a market analysis
where the casino will be built. We (as predecessor to Grand
Casinos Inc.) began developing Indian casino projects in 1990
and demonstrated success from the day the first Indian casino
opened in 1991 through the expiration of the Coushatta
management contract in 2002. Additionally, we have been managing
the Cimarron Casino since 2006, as well as the Four Winds Casino
Resort since August of 2007. This successful history legitimizes
many of the key assumptions supporting the financial models.
Projections for each applicable casino development were
developed based on analysis of published information pertaining
to the particular markets in which our Indian casinos will be
located and are updated quarterly based on evolving events and
market conditions. In addition, we have many years of casino
35
operations experience, which provides a basis for our revenue
expectations. The projections were prepared by us not for
purposes of the valuation at hand but rather for purposes of our
and the tribes business planning.
The primary assumptions included within managements
financial model for each Indian casino project are as follows:
Jamul
Tribe
We and the Jamul Tribe have consulted with third party advisors
as to the architectural feasibility of a plan to build a casino
with related amenities such as parking on the six acres of
reservation land held by the Jamul Tribe and have concluded that
such a project could be successfully built assuming adequate
financing can be obtained. As of September 30, 2007, we
have included assumptions within our financial model that
reflect current discussions with the Jamul Tribe to reduce the
size of the planned casino facility as a result of comments
received from various state agencies including representatives
from the California Governors office related to the Jamul
Tribes project. The gaming facility is currently planned
to be a class II electronic gaming device facility which
will not require a compact. The agreement between Lakes and the
Jamul Tribe will also be modified to reflect the new economics
of the revised casino plan but will not be subject to approval
by the State of California or the NIGC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
No. of Class II electronic gaming devices
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
No. of Table games
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
No. of Poker tables
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
Win/Class II electronic gaming devices/day 1st
year
|
|
$
|
172
|
|
|
$
|
250
|
|
Win/Table game/day 1st year
|
|
$
|
471
|
|
|
$
|
900
|
|
Win/Poker table/day 1st year
|
|
$
|
312
|
|
|
$
|
650
|
|
The San Diego market contains other Indian-owned casinos in
the surrounding area, each of which is self-managed. Because of
the proprietary nature of those operations no public information
is readily attainable. However, based on the apparent successful
nature of their operations (large casinos which continually
expand, new hotel developments, new golf courses, etc.) coupled
with our knowledge of their operations, we feel that a
successful operation can be built.
Shingle
Springs Tribe
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
No. of Class III slot machines
|
|
349
|
|
349
|
No. of Class II electronic gaming devices
|
|
1,651
|
|
1,651
|
No. of Table games
|
|
100
|
|
100
|
Win/Class II & III electronic gaming devices/slot
machine/day 1st year
|
|
$350
|
|
$350
|
Win/Table game/day 1st year
|
|
$1,275
|
|
$1,275
|
Expected increase (decrease) in management fee cash flows
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year 2 17.6%
|
|
Year 2 8.0%
|
|
|
Year 3 10.5%
|
|
Year 3 7.5%
|
|
|
Year 4 7.9%
|
|
Year 4 7.1%
|
|
|
Year 5 8.8%
|
|
Year 5 6.4%
|
|
|
Year 6 (4.0)%
|
|
Year 6 -- (12.3)%
|
|
|
(management fees were
reduced in year six)
|
|
(management fees were
reduced in year six)
|
|
|
Year 7 5.0%
|
|
Year 7 11.7%
|
36
In the Shingle Springs Sacramento market, there is one other
Indian casino that is managed by another public company.
Management considered the available information related to this
other Indian casino when projecting management fees from the
Shingle Springs Casino project. Based on the apparent successful
nature of their operations coupled with our knowledge of their
operations, we feel that our forecast of operations is within
the revenue metrics of the market.
As of September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, we are
not aware of any impairment indicators related to the recorded
long-term assets related to the Shingle Springs or Jamul
projects.
Description
of each Indian casino project and evaluation of critical
milestones:
Pokagon
Band
Business arrangement. On August 2, 2007,
the Four Winds Casino Resort in New Buffalo, Michigan opened to
the public. We receive approximately 24% of net income up to a
certain level and 19% of the net income over that level, as a
management fee. The term of the management contract, as amended,
is currently planned for five years, which began on
August 2, 2007. Payment of our management fee is
subordinated to the Pokagon Gaming Authoritys senior
indebtedness relating to the Four Winds Casino Resort. The
Pokagon Band may also buy out the management contract provisions
after two years from the opening date. The buyout amount is
calculated based upon the previous 12 months of management
fees earned multiplied by the remaining number of years under
the management contract, discounted back to the present value at
the time the buyout occurs. The NIGC approved the management
contract in March 2006.
Shingle
Springs Tribe
Business arrangement. Plans for the Shingle
Springs Casino project include an approximately
278,000 square-foot facility (including approximately
88,000 square feet of gaming space) to be located adjacent
to the planned Shingle Springs Rancheria exit, approximately
35 miles east of downtown Sacramento, on U.S. Highway
50. The Shingle Springs Casino project is currently planned to
feature approximately 2,000 gaming devices and approximately 100
table games, a high stakes gaming room, as well as restaurants,
enclosed parking and other facilities.
We acquired our initial interest in the development and
management contracts for the Shingle Springs Casino project from
Kean Argovitz Resorts- Shingle Springs, LLC
(KAR Shingle Springs) in 1999 and formed
a joint venture, in which the contracts were held, between us
and KAR Shingle Springs. On January 30, 2003,
we purchased the remaining KAR Shingle Springs
partnership interest in the joint venture. In connection with
the purchase transaction, we entered into separate agreements
with the two individual owners of KAR Shingle
Springs (Kevin M. Kean and Jerry A. Argovitz). Under the
agreement with Mr. Kean, he may elect to serve as a
consultant to us during the term of the casino management
contract if he is found suitable by relevant gaming regulatory
authorities. In such event, Mr. Kean will be entitled to
receive annual consulting fees equal to 15% of the management
fees received by us from the Shingle Springs Casino project
operations, less certain costs of these operations. If
Mr. Kean is not found suitable by relevant gaming
regulatory authorities or otherwise elects not to serve as a
consultant, he will be entitled to receive annual payments of
$1 million from the Shingle Springs Casino project during
the term of the respective casino management contract (but not
during any renewal term of such management contract).
Under the agreement with Mr. Argovitz, if he is found
suitable by relevant gaming regulatory authorities he may elect
to re-purchase his respective original equity interest in our
subsidiary and then be entitled to obtain a 15% equity interest
in our entity that holds the rights to the management contract
with the Shingle Springs Casino project. If he is not found
suitable or does not elect to purchase equity interests in our
subsidiary, Mr. Argovitz would receive annual payments of
$1 million from the Shingle Springs Casino project from the
date of election through the term of the respective casino
management contract (but not during any renewal term of such
management contract).
The development agreement, as amended, provides for us to make
certain pre-construction advances to the Shingle Springs Tribe
in the form of a transition loan and land loan up to a maximum
combined amount of $75.0 million. On June 28, 2007 an
affiliate of the Shingle Springs Tribe closed on a
$450 million senior note financing to fund the Foothill
Oaks Casino project.
The amended development agreement provides for us to assist in
the design, development and construction of the facility as well
as manage the pre-opening, opening and continued operations of
the casino and related amenities for a period of seven years. As
compensation for our management services, we will receive a
management fee between 21%
37
and 30% of net income (as that term is defined by the management
contract) of the operations annually for the first five years
with a declining percentage in years six and seven. Payment of
our management fee is subordinated to the $450 million
senior note financing of the affiliate of the Shingle Springs
Tribe and a minimum priority payment to the Shingle Springs
Tribe. The Shingle Springs Tribe may terminate the agreement
after five years from the opening of the casino if any of
certain required elements of the project have not been
developed. The management contract includes provisions that
allow the Shingle Springs Tribe to buy out the management
contract after four years from the opening date. The buyout
amount is calculated based upon the previous twelve months of
management fees earned multiplied by the remaining number of
years under the contract, discounted back to the present value
at the time the buyout occurs.
Our evaluation of the critical milestones. The
following table outlines the status of each of the following
primary milestones necessary to complete the Shingle Springs
Casino project as of the end of the third quarter of fiscal
2007, fiscal 2006 and fiscal 2005. Both the positive and
negative evidence was reviewed during our evaluation of the
critical milestones.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Critical milestone
|
|
|
September 30, 2007
|
|
|
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
January 1, 2006
|
Federal recognition of the tribe
|
|
|
Yes
|
|
|
Yes
|
|
|
Yes
|
|
Possession of usable land corresponding with needs based on
Lakes project plan
|
|
|
Yes
|
|
|
Yes
|
|
|
Yes
|
|
Usable land placed in trust by Federal government
|
|
|
Not necessary, as land is reservation land.
|
|
|
Not necessary, as land is reservation land.
|
|
|
Not necessary, as land is reservation land.
|
|
Usable county agreement, if applicable
|
|
|
Yes
|
|
|
Yes
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Usable state compact that allows for gaming consistent with
that outlined in Lakes project plan
|
|
|
Yes
|
|
|
Yes
|
|
|
Yes
|
|
NIGC approval of management contract in current and desired
form
|
|
|
Yes
|
|
|
Yes
|
|
|
Yes approval received in 2004.
|
|
Resolution of all litigation and legal obstacles
|
|
|
No See below.
|
|
|
No See below.
|
|
|
No, Federal and state litigation regarding approval of highway
interchange, environmental issues and other issues.
See below.
|
|
Financing for construction
|
|
|
Yes. On June 28, 2007 an affiliate of the Shingle Springs Tribe
closed on a $450 million senior note financing to fund the
Foothill Oaks Casino project in Shingle Springs, California.
|
|
|
No, however the Shingle Springs Tribe has engaged investment
banks to assist with obtaining financing.
|
|
|
No, however the Shingle Springs Tribe has engaged investment
banks to assist with obtaining financing.
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Critical milestone
|
|
|
September 30, 2007
|
|
|
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
January 1, 2006
|
Any other significant project milestones or contingencies,
the outcome of which could have a material affect on the
probability of project completion as planned
|
|
|
No others known at this time by Lakes.
|
|
|
No others known at this time by Lakes.
|
|
|
No others known at this time by Lakes.
|
|
Our evaluation and conclusion regarding the above critical
milestones and progress: The Shingle Springs
Tribe is a federally recognized tribe, has a compact with the
State of California and owns approximately 160 acres of
reservation land on which the casino can be built. During July
2004, we received notification from the NIGC that the
development and management contract between the Shingle Springs
Tribe and us, allowing us to manage a Class II and
Class III casino, was approved by the NIGC.
The Shingle Springs Casino project is currently planned to open
with 349 Class III slot machines and approximately 1,650
Class II electronic gaming devices. Under the form of
tribal-state compact first signed by the State of California
with the Shingle Springs Tribe in 1999, the Shingle Springs
Tribe is allowed to operate up to 350 Class III slot
machines without licenses from the state. This form of compact
allows California tribes to operate additional Class II
electronic gaming devices. Under these tribal-state compacts,
there is a state-wide limitation on the aggregate number of
Class III slot machine licenses that are available. Tribes
who have entered into new tribal-state compacts or amendments to
the 1999 form of tribal-state compact in general are allowed to
operate an unlimited number of Class II electronic gaming
devices without the need for obtaining additional licenses,
subject to the payment of additional fees to the state,
including, in recent cases, fees based on a percentage of slot
net win. Currently, the Shingle Springs Tribe has
not amended its tribal-state compact. If the compact is not
renegotiated and amended, the Shingle Springs Tribe could
operate under its existing compact which allows for up to 350
Class III gaming devices and an unlimited number of
Class II electronic gaming devices. Management believes
that this number of gaming devices is adequate to equip the
planned development, and therefore, the availability of
additional slot licenses is not an issue that could prevent the
project from progressing.
El Dorado County and Voices for Rural Living (VRL)
commenced litigation in 2003 against the California regulatory
agencies attempting to block the approval of the interchange.
The litigation has resulted in various decisions in favor of the
California regulatory agencies to proceed with the interchange
and subsequent appeals by El Dorado County and VRL of those
decisions over the next several years. For a more complete
discussion of the history of this litigation see Item 3 of
our Annual Report on
Form 10-K,
as amended, for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006.
A construction permit for the U.S. Highway 50 interchange,
which will provide direct access to the Shingle Springs
Rancheria on which the Shingle Springs Casino project will be
built, was issued on April 30, 2007 and construction began
on the U.S. Highway 50 interchange on May 7, 2007.
Due to the close of the $450 million senior note financing
and construction progress made on the U.S. Highway 50
interchange, construction of the Foothill Oaks casino project
commenced during June of fiscal 2007 and also increased the
estimated probability of opening the casino development project
from 85% to 95% in the second quarter of 2007.
As a result of achieving the critical milestones as described
above, the casino is planned to open in late 2008.
Jamul
Tribe
Business arrangement. The Jamul Tribe has an
approximate
six-acre
reservation on which the casino project is currently planned to
be built. The reservation is located near San Diego,
California.
Lakes acquired its initial interest in the development agreement
and management contract for the Jamul casino from Kean Argovitz
Resorts-Jamul, LLC (KAR Jamul) in 1999
and formed a joint venture in which the contracts were held
between Lakes and KAR Jamul. This development
agreement and a management contract
39
have been submitted to the NIGC for approval. On
January 30, 2003, Lakes purchased the remaining
KAR Jamuls partnership interest in the joint
venture. In connection with the purchase transaction, Lakes
entered into separate agreements with the two individual owners
of KAR Jamul (Mr. Kean and Mr. Argovitz).
The term of the contract is expected to be five or seven years.
Under the current agreement with Mr. Kean, Mr. Kean
may elect to serve as a consultant to Lakes during the term of
the casino agreement if he is found suitable by relevant gaming
regulatory authorities. In such event, Mr. Kean will be
entitled to receive annual consulting fees equal to 20% of the
management fees received by Lakes from the Jamul Casino
operations, less certain costs of these operations. If
Mr. Kean is not found suitable by relevant gaming
regulatory authorities or otherwise elects not to serve as a
consultant, he will be entitled to receive annual payments of
$1 million from the Jamul Casino project during the term of
the respective casino agreement (but not during any renewal term
of such agreement).
Under the current agreement with Mr. Argovitz, if he is
found suitable by relevant gaming regulatory authorities he may
elect to re-purchase his respective original equity interest in
the Lakes subsidiary and then be entitled to obtain a 20% equity
interest in the Lakes entity that holds the rights to the
development agreement and management contract with the Jamul
Tribe. If he is not found suitable or does not elect to purchase
equity interests in the Lakes subsidiary, Mr. Argovitz may
elect to receive annual payments of $1 million from the
Jamul Casino project from the date of election through the term
of the respective casino agreement (but not during any renewal
term of such agreement).
Effective March 30, 2006, Lakes entered into a development
financing and services agreement with the Jamul Tribe to assist
the Jamul Tribe in developing the Jamul Casino which the Jamul
Tribe will manage. As part of the current agreement, Lakes will
use its best efforts to obtain financing from which advances
will be made to the Jamul Tribe of up to $350 million to
pay for the design and construction of the Jamul Casino. There
can be no assurance that third party financing will be available
with acceptable terms, and if Lakes is unable to obtain the
appropriate amount of financing for this project, the project
may not be completed as planned.
Under the current development financing and services agreement,
Lakes is entitled to receive a flat fee of $15 million for
its development design services, and a flat fee of
$15 million for its construction oversight services,
payable evenly over the first five years after the opening date
of the Jamul Casino. In connection with Lakes financing of
the Jamul Casino, the Jamul Tribe is required to pay interest
over a ten-year period on sums advanced by Lakes equal to the
rate charged to Lakes for obtaining the necessary funds plus 5%.
Amounts previously advanced by Lakes to the Jamul Tribe in
connection with the Jamul Tribes proposed casino resort
are included in the development financing and services agreement
financing amount.
Under the current compact that the Jamul Tribe has with the
State of California (the State) and based upon
requirements in other compacts approved by the State in 2004,
the Jamul Tribe completed a Tribal Environmental Impact
Statement/Report that was approved by the Jamul Tribes
General Council with a record of decision issued by the Jamul
Tribe on December 16, 2006. Since that time, the Jamul
Tribe has received comments from various state agencies
including the representative from the California Governors
office. The Jamul Tribe and the State met on several occasions
in an attempt to address the States comments related to
compact requirements. Based on the most recent meeting with the
State, Lakes and the Jamul Tribe evaluated the Jamul
Tribes alternatives of pursuing a new compact, complying
with certain requirements in their existing compact or building
and operating a casino based solely on class II electronic
gaming devices. Since resolution of any requests by the State
related to the Jamul Tribes existing compact or a proposed
new compact may take more time than is acceptable to the Jamul
Tribe, it was determined that the proposed gaming facility
should be reduced in size and scope. The current plan is for the
gaming facility to decrease in size and become a solely
class II electronic gaming device facility which will not
require a compact. The agreement between Lakes and the Jamul
Tribe will also be modified to reflect the new economics of the
revised casino plan but will not be subject to approval by the
State of California or the NIGC.
40
Lakes evaluation of the critical
milestones. The following table outlines the
status of each of the following primary milestones necessary to
complete the Jamul project as of the end of the third quarter of
fiscal 2007, fiscal 2006 and fiscal 2005. Both the positive and
negative evidence was reviewed during Lakes evaluation of
the critical milestones.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Critical milestone
|
|
|
September 30, 2007
|
|
|
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
January 1, 2006
|
Federal recognition of the tribe
|
|
|
Yes
|
|
|
Yes
|
|
|
Yes
|
|
Possession of usable land corresponding with needs based on
Lakes project plan
|
|
|
Yes
|
|
|
Yes
|
|
|
Yes
|
|
Usable land placed in trust by Federal government
|
|
|
Not necessary, as the land to be used for the project is
reservation land.
|
|
|
Not necessary, as land is reservation land.
|
|
|
Yes, six acres is reservation land held by the Jamul Tribe on
which the casino will be built. There is an additional
82 acres contiguous to the reservation land pending BIA
approval to be placed into trust that could be used for
additional development of the project. The Jamul Tribe and Lakes
prepared an EIS and trust application, which has been submitted
to, reviewed and recommended for approval by the regional office
of the BIA. The Washington, D.C. office of the BIA is
currently reviewing the submission.
|
|
Usable county agreement, if applicable
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Usable state compact that allows for gaming consistent with
that outlined in Lakes project plan
|
|
|
Yes
|
|
|
Yes
|
|
|
Yes
|
|
NIGC approval of management contract in current and desired
form
|
|
|
N/A as the Jamul Tribe and Lakes entered into a development
financing and services agreement in March 2006, which does not
need to be approved by the NIGC.
|
|
|
N/A as the Jamul Tribe and Lakes entered into a development
financing and services agreement in March 2006, which does not
need to be approved by the NIGC.
|
|
|
No, submitted for approval by the NIGC in 2000. We are in
communication with the NIGC and have responded to initial
comments. Approval is not expected until the process to place
land in trust by the BIA is complete.
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Critical milestone
|
|
|
September 30, 2007
|
|
|
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
January 1, 2006
|
Resolution of all litigation and legal obstacles
|
|
|
N/A, there has been some local opposition regarding the project.
|
|
|
N/A, there has been some local opposition regarding the project.
|
|
|
N/A, there has been some local opposition regarding the project,
although no formal legal action has been taken.
|
|
Financing for construction
|
|
|
No, however, preliminary discussions with investment bankers
regarding assisting in obtaining financing have taken place.
|
|
|
No, however, preliminary discussions with investment bankers
regarding assisting in obtaining financing have taken place.
|
|
|
No, however, preliminary discussions with investment bankers
regarding assisting in obtaining financing have taken place.
|
|
Any other significant project milestones or contingencies,
the outcome of which could have a material affect on the
probability of project completion as planned
|
|
|
Yes. The Jamul Tribe and the State of California have had a
series of meetings to discuss what requirements the State has to
either allow the project to be built as currently planned or to
enter into a new compact similar to those approved in 2004 for
other tribes in the State. The Jamul Tribe has decided to move
forward with building a casino based solely on class II
electronic gaming devices. This plan will decrease the size and
scope of the project, but will allow it to move forward.
|
|
|
Yes. The Jamul Tribe and the State of California have had a
series of recent meetings to discuss what requirements the State
has to either allow the project to be built as currently planned
or to enter into a new compact similar to those approved in 2004
for other tribes in the State. Based on these discussions, the
Jamul Tribe is evaluating which of any of these requirements are
acceptable or in lieu of a compact, building a casino based
solely on class II electronic gaming devices.
|
|
|
No others known at this time by Lakes.
|
|
Lakes evaluation and conclusion regarding the above
critical milestones and progress. We entered into
a development financing and services agreement with the Jamul
Tribe in March 2006 as discussed above which eliminated the need
for land contiguous to the reservation land being taken into
trust. There is no requirement that the NIGC approve the
development financing and services agreement. The Jamul Casino
is planned to be built on the Jamul Tribes existing six
acres of reservation land. Reservation land qualifies for gaming
without going through a land in trust process.
Under the form of tribal-state compact first signed by the State
of California with the Jamul Tribe in 1999, the Jamul Tribe is
allowed to operate up to 350 Class III slot machines
without licenses from the state. This form of compact also
allows California tribes to operate additional Class II
electronic gaming devices. Under these tribal-state compacts,
there is a state-wide limitation on the aggregate number of
Class III slot machine licenses that are available to
tribes. Certain tribes have entered into new tribal-state
compacts or amendments to the 1999 form of tribal-state compact
that allow them to operate an unlimited number of Class II
electronic gaming devices without the need for obtaining
additional licenses, subject to the payment of additional fees
to the state, including in recent cases, fees based on a
percentage of slot net win. Currently, the Jamul
Tribe has not amended its tribal-state compact. If the compact
is not renegotiated and amended, the Jamul Tribe believes it
could operate under its existing compact which allow for up to
350 Class III gaming devices and an unlimited number of
Class II electronic gaming devices, or the Jamul Tribe
could choose to operate only Class II gaming devices
without a compact and currently plans to do so. We believe this
number of gaming devices is adequate under either approach to
equip the
42
planned development and therefore, we believe the availability
of additional slot licenses should not prevent the project from
progressing.
The process of getting the land contiguous to the reservation
placed into trust has been slow. Therefore, during August of
2005, we and the Jamul Tribe formally announced plans to build
the casino on the approximately six acres of reservation land
held by the Jamul Tribe. The design of the project was changed
significantly from a complex of lower-level buildings spread out
over a larger area to a multi-level resort built on a smaller
parcel of land.
We have consulted with third-party advisors as to the
architectural feasibility of the alternative plan and have been
assured that the project can be successfully built on the
reservation land. We have also completed economic models for
various alternatives and concluded that each alternative would
result in a successful operation assuming that adequate
financing can be obtained. Therefore, we believe this project
will be successfully completed.
We and the leaders of the Jamul Tribe are currently evaluating
plans for the casino facility to determine when construction
will start and when casino operations will begin.
Iowa
Tribe
Business arrangement. On March 15, 2005,
Lakes, through its wholly-owned subsidiaries, entered into
consulting agreements and management contracts with the Iowa
Tribe. The agreements are effective as of January 27, 2005.
Lakes will provide consulting services to assist the Iowa Tribe
in developing a new first class casino and ancillary amenities
and facilities to be located on Indian land approximately
25 miles northeast of Oklahoma City along Route 66 (the
Ioway Casino); and currently manages operations at
the Cimarron Casino, located in Perkins Oklahoma. Lakes will
also provide management services for the Tribes casino
operations at the planned Ioway Casino project subject to
regulatory approval.
Each of the projects has a gaming consulting agreement
(Iowa Consulting Agreement) and a management
contract (Iowa Management Contract), independent of
the other project. Key terms relating to the agreements for the
projects are as follows:
Ioway Casino. For its gaming development
consulting services under the Iowa Consulting Agreement related
to the Ioway Casino, Lakes will receive a development fee of
$4 million paid upon the opening of the Ioway Casino, and a
flat monthly fee of $500,000 commencing upon the opening of the
project.
Lakes has agreed to make advances to the Iowa Tribe pursuant to
a project budget to be agreed upon by Lakes and the Iowa Tribe
and certain other conditions. The development loan will be for
preliminary development costs under the Ioway Casino budget.
Lakes has also agreed to use reasonable efforts to assist the
Iowa Tribe in obtaining permanent financing for any projects
developed under the Iowa Consulting Agreement.
The Iowa Management Contract for the Ioway Casino is subject to
the approval of the NIGC and certain other conditions. For its
performance under the Iowa Management Contract, Lakes will be
entitled to receive management fees of approximately 30% of net
income, as defined in the agreement, for each month during the
term of the Iowa Management Contract. The Iowa Management
Contract term is seven years from the first day that Lakes is
able to commence management of the Ioway Casino gaming
operations under all legal and regulatory requirements (the
Commencement Date), provided that the Iowa Tribe has
the right to buy out the remaining term of the Iowa Management
Contract after the Ioway Casino has been in continuous operation
for four years, for an amount based on the then present value of
estimated future management fees. If the Iowa Tribe elects to
buy-out the contract, all outstanding amounts owed to Lakes
become immediately due and payable if not already paid. Subject
to certain conditions, Lakes agreed to make advances for the
Ioway Casinos working capital requirements, if needed,
during the first month after the Commencement Date. The advances
are to be repaid through an operating note payable from revenues
generated by future operations of the Ioway Casino bearing
interest at two percent over the prime rate. Lakes also agrees
to fund any shortfall in certain minimum monthly Ioway Casino
payments to the Iowa Tribe by means of non-interest bearing
advances under the same operating note.
Cimarron Casino. Lakes has entered into a
separate gaming consulting agreement (Cimarron Consulting
Agreement) and management contract (Cimarron
Management Contract) with the Iowa Tribe with respect to
the Cimarron Casino. Lakes operated under the Cimarron
Consulting agreement until the NIGC approved the seven
43
year Cimarron Management Contract on May 1, 2006, and Lakes
is currently managing the Cimarron Casino under that agreement.
The annual fee under the Cimarron Management Contract is 30% of
net income in excess of $4 million. The fee under the
Cimarron Consulting agreement consisted entirely of a limited
flat monthly fee of $50,000.
Arrangement with consultant. Lakes has an
agreement with Kevin Kean that will compensate him for his
consulting services (relating to the Iowa Tribe) rendered to
Lakes. Under this arrangement, subject to Mr. Kean
obtaining certain regulatory approvals, Mr. Kean will
receive 20% of Lakes fee compensation that is received
under the Iowa Consulting Agreement, Iowa Management Contract
and Cimarron Management Contract with the Iowa Tribe (i.e., six
percent of the incremental total net income or 20% of
Lakes 30% share). This agreement provides that payments
will be due to Mr. Kean when Lakes is paid by the Iowa
Tribe and after Mr. Kean has been found suitable by the
NIGC.
Lakes evaluation of the Ioway casino
project. The following table outlines the status
of each of the following primary milestones necessary to
complete the Ioway Casino project as of the end of the third
quarter of fiscal 2007, fiscal 2006 and fiscal 2005. Both the
positive and negative evidence was reviewed during Lakes
evaluation of the critical milestones:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Critical milestone
|
|
|
September 30, 2007
|
|
|
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
January 1, 2006
|
Federal recognition of the tribe
|
|
|
Yes
|
|
|
Yes
|
|
|
Yes
|
|
Possession of usable land corresponding with needs based on
Lakes project plan
|
|
|
Yes, the Iowa Tribe has Tribal members that own a 74-acre
allotment on US Route 66 midway between the access points to
Warwick and Chandler, Oklahoma from I44. The Iowa Tribe has
obtained the rights to purchase and/or lease this parcel from
the allottees. An additional 100 acres of fee land has been
purchased to provide the necessary site area for the beginning
of the project.
|
|
|
Yes, the Iowa Tribe has members that own a 74-acre allotment on
US Route 66 midway between the access points to Warwick and
Chandler, Oklahoma from I44. The Iowa Tribe has obtained the
rights to purchase and/or lease this parcel from the allottees.
An additional 100 acres of fee land has been optioned to
provide the necessary site area for the beginning of the project.
|
|
|
Yes, the Iowa Tribe is currently leasing and acquiring land from
tribal members, which is held in trust for the individual tribal
members by the United States Government. These transactions will
need to be approved by the BIA.
|
|
Usable land placed in trust by Federal government
|
|
|
Yes, the Iowa Tribe is currently leasing and acquiring land from
tribal members, which is held in trust for the individual tribal
members by the United States Government. These transactions will
need to be approved by the BIA.
|
|
|
Yes, the Iowa Tribe is currently leasing and acquiring land from
tribal members, which is held in trust for the individual tribal
members by the United States Government. These transactions will
need to be approved by the BIA.
|
|
|
Yes, the Iowa Tribe is currently leasing and acquiring land from
tribal members, which is held in trust for the individual tribal
members by the United States Government. These transactions will
need to be approved by the BIA.
|
|
Usable county agreement, if applicable
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Critical milestone
|
|
|
September 30, 2007
|
|
|
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
January 1, 2006
|
Usable state compact that allows for gaming consistent with
that outlined in Lakes project plan
|
|
|
Yes
|
|
|
Yes
|
|
|
Yes
|
|
NIGC approval of management contract in current and desired
form
|
|
|
No, submitted to the NIGC for review on April 22, 2005. The NIGC
has provided their final comments to the Iowa Tribe on the
management contract and the Iowa Tribe has approved the
revisions and returned the contract to the NIGC for final
action. There have been no comments on the consulting agreement
from the NIGC and is therefore considered operative.
|
|
|
No, submitted to the NIGC for review on April 22, 2005. An EA is
currently being prepared and is necessary for the management
contract to be approved. Completion of the EA is expected by
Spring 2007. There have been no comments on the consulting
agreement from the NIGC and is therefore considered operative.
|
|
|
No, submitted to the NIGC for review on April 22, 2005. An EA
will be prepared in order for the management contract to be
approved.
|
|
Resolution of all litigation and legal obstacles
|
|
|
None at this time.
|
|
|
None at this time.
|
|
|
None at this time.
|
|
Financing for construction
|
|
|
No. Preliminary discussions with lending institutions have
occurred.
|
|
|
No. Preliminary discussions with lending institutions have
occurred.
|
|
|
No. Preliminary discussions with lending institutions have
occurred.
|
|
Any other significant project milestones or contingencies,
the outcome of which could have a material affect on the
probability of project completion as planned
|
|
|
No others known at this time by Lakes.
|
|
|
No others known at this time by Lakes.
|
|
|
No others known at this time by Lakes.
|
|
Lakes evaluation and conclusion regarding the above
critical milestones and progress. Long-term
assets have been recorded as it is considered probable that the
Ioway Casino project will result in economic benefit to us
sufficient to recover our investment. Based upon the above
status of all primary milestones and the projected fees to be
earned under the consulting agreements and management contracts,
no impairment has been recorded. The Ioway Casino could open as
early as July 2009.
Pawnee
Nation of Oklahoma
Business arrangement. In January 2005, we
entered into three gaming development and consulting agreements
and three separate management contracts with three wholly-owned
subsidiaries of the Pawnee Nation in connection with assisting
the Pawnee Nation in developing, equipping and managing three
separate casino destinations.
On December 1, 2006, we announced that the Pawnee Business
Council declined to approve a proposed updated tribal agreement
with our subsidiary relating to the Pawnee Trading Post Casino.
The consulting agreement
45
and management contract were originally entered into in January
2005, and since then several new members have been appointed to
the Pawnee Business Council which has resulted in a substantial
change in the Pawnee Business Councils membership. We, the
Pawnee TDC and its gaming subsidiaries (the tribal entities that
own and operate the tribal casinos), which support approving the
updated tribal agreement and our involvement in the projects,
are evaluating how to proceed with the current project
agreements given this action, including perhaps terminating the
project agreements.
Recently
issued accounting pronouncements
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157,
Fair Value Measurements, which defines fair value,
establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands
disclosures about fair value measurements. In February 2007, the
FASB issued SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for
Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities Including
an amendment of FASB Statement No. 115, which will
permit the option of choosing to measure certain eligible items
at fair value at specified election dates and report unrealized
gains and losses in earnings. SFAS No. 157 and
SFAS No. 159 will both become effective for our 2008
fiscal year and we are currently evaluating the effect, if any,
that they will have on our financial position, results of
operations and operating cash flows.
Seasonality
We believe that the operations of all casinos to be managed by
us will be affected by seasonal factors, including holidays,
weather and travel conditions. WPTEs license revenues are
affected by the timetable for delivery of episodes to TRV.
Regulation
and taxes
We and the casinos to be managed by us are subject to extensive
regulation by state gaming authorities. We will also be subject
to regulation, which may or may not be similar to current state
regulations, by the appropriate authorities in any jurisdiction
where we may conduct gaming activities in the future. Changes in
applicable laws or regulations could have an adverse effect on
us.
The gaming industry represents a significant source of tax
revenues to regulators. From time to time, various federal
legislators and officials have proposed changes in tax law, or
in the administration of such law, affecting the gaming
industry. It is not possible to determine the likelihood of
possible changes in tax law or in the administration of such
law. Such changes, if adopted, could have a material adverse
effect on our future financial position, results of operations
and cash flows.
Off-balance
sheet arrangements
We have no off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are
reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our
financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or
expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures
or capital resources that is material to investors, except for
the financing commitments previously discussed.
Private
Securities Litigation Reform Act
The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 provides a
safe harbor for forward-looking statements. Certain
information included in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K
and other materials filed or to be filed by Lakes with the
United States Securities and Exchange Commission
(SEC) as well as information included in oral
statements or other written statements made or to be made by
Lakes contain statements that are forward-looking, such as plans
for future expansion and other business development activities
as well as other statements regarding capital spending,
financing sources and the effects of regulation (including
gaming and tax regulation) and competition.
46
Such forward looking information involves important risks and
uncertainties that could significantly affect the anticipated
results in the future and, accordingly, actual results may
differ materially from those expressed in any forward-looking
statements made by or on behalf of Lakes.
These risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to,
need for financing to meet Lakes future operational and
development needs; those relating to the inability to complete
or possible delays in completion of Lakes casino projects,
including various regulatory approvals and numerous other
conditions which must be satisfied before completion of these
projects; possible termination or adverse modification of
management or development contracts; Lakes operates in a highly
competitive industry; possible changes in regulations; reliance
on continued positive relationships with Indian tribes and
repayment of amounts owed to Lakes by Indian tribes; continued
contracts with the Pawnee Nation as a result of the change in
its business council membership; possible need for future
financing to meet Lakes expansion goals; risks of entry
into new businesses; reliance on Lakes management; and the
fact that the WPT Enterprises, Inc. (NASDAQ: WPTE)
(WPTE) shares held by Lakes are currently not liquid
assets, and there is no assurance that Lakes will be able to
realize value from these holdings equal to the current or future
market value of WPTE common stock. There are also risks and
uncertainties relating to WPTE that may have a material effect
on Lakes consolidated results of operations or the market
value of the WPTE shares held by Lakes, including WPTEs
significant dependence on The Travel Channel, L.L.C. as a
current source of revenue and GSN as a future source of revenue,
and the risk that GSN will not exercise its options to air
seasons of the WPT series beyond Season Six; the potential that
WPTEs television programming will fail to maintain a
sufficient audience; difficulty of predicting the growth of
WPTEs online casino business, which is a relatively new
industry with an increasing number of market entrants; reliance
on the efforts of CryptoLogic to develop and maintain the online
gaming website in compliance with WPTEs business model and
applicable gaming laws; the risk that WPTE may not be able to
protect its entertainment concepts, current and future brands
and other intellectual property rights; the risk that
competitors with greater financial resources or marketplace
presence might develop television programming that would
directly compete with WPTEs television programming; risks
associated with future expansion into new or complementary
businesses; the termination or impairment of WPTEs
relationships with key licensing and strategic partners; and
WPTEs dependence on its senior management team. For more
information, review Lakes filings with the Securities and
Exchange Commission. For further information regarding the risks
and uncertainties, see the Risk Factors section in
Item 1A of our Annual Report on
Form 10-K,
as amended, for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006.
|
|
ITEM 3.
|
QUANTITATIVE
AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
|
Our financial instruments include cash and cash equivalents and
marketable securities. Our main investment objectives are the
preservation of investment capital and the maximization of
after-tax returns on our investment portfolio. Consequently, we
invest with only high-credit-quality issuers and limit the
amount of credit exposure to any one issuer.
Our cash and cash equivalents are not subject to significant
interest rate risk due to the short maturities of these
instruments. As of September 30, 2007, the carrying value
of our cash and cash equivalents approximates fair value. We
also hold short-term investments consisting of marketable debt
securities (principally consisting of commercial paper,
corporate bonds, and government securities) having a
weighted-average duration of one year or less. Consequently,
such securities are not subject to significant interest rate
risk.
Our primary exposure to market risk associated with changes in
interest rates involves our long-term assets related to Indian
casino projects in the form of notes receivable due from our
tribal partners for the development and construction of
Indian-owned casinos. The loans earn interest based upon a
defined reference rate. The floating interest rate will generate
more or less interest income if interest rates rise or fall. Our
notes receivable from Indian tribes related to properties under
development bear interest generally at prime plus one percent or
two percent, however, the interest is only payable if the casino
is successfully opened and distributable profits are available
from casino operations. We record our notes receivable at fair
value and subsequent changes in fair value are recorded as
unrealized gains or losses in our Unaudited Condensed
Consolidated Statement of Earnings (Loss) and Comprehensive
Earnings (Loss). As of September 30, 2007, we had
$79.3 million of notes receivable, at fair value with a
floating interest rate (principal amount of $80.3 million).
Based on the applicable current reference rates and assuming all
other factors remain constant, interest income for a
12 month period would be approximately $7.8 million. A
reference rate increase of 100 basis points
47
would result in an increase in interest income of
$0.8 million. A 100 basis point decrease in the
reference rate would result in a decrease of $0.8 million
in interest income over the same 12 month period.
|
|
ITEM 4.
|
CONTROLS
AND PROCEDURES
|
Under the supervision and with the participation of our
management, including our chief executive officer and chief
financial officer, we conducted an evaluation of our disclosure
controls and procedures, as such term is defined under
Rules 13a-15(e)
and Rule 15d 15(e) promulgated under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as of the end of the period
covered by this quarterly report. Based on their evaluation, our
chief executive officer and chief financial officer concluded
that Lakes Entertainment, Inc.s disclosure controls and
procedures are effective.
There have been no changes (including corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies or material weaknesses) in
our internal control over financial reporting during the three
months ended September 30, 2007 that have materially
affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our
internal control over financial reporting.
48
Part II.
Other Information
|
|
ITEM 1.
|
LEGAL
PROCEEDINGS
|
WPTE
litigation.
On July 19, 2006, a legal action was commenced against WPTE
by seven poker players that alleged that WPTE engaged in, among
other things, unfair, anti-competitive business practices. On
March 14, 2007, the plaintiffs filed a motion for summary
judgment and on April 12, 2007 WPTE filed its opposition to
the motion. On May 22, 2007, the court denied the
plaintiffs motion for summary judgment. A trial date has
been set for April 1, 2008.
Miscellaneous
legal matters.
We and our subsidiaries (including WPTE) are involved in various
other inquiries, administrative proceedings, and pending or
threatened litigation relating to contracts and other matters
arising in the normal course of business. While any proceeding
or litigation has an element of uncertainty, management
currently believes that an unfavorable outcome in these matters
is not probable. Furthermore, even in the event of an
unfavorable outcome in one or all of these matters, the
estimated effect on the unaudited condensed consolidated
financial statements would not likely be material. Accordingly,
no provision for loss has been recorded in connection therewith.
There have been no material changes to our risk factors
identified in the Risk Factors section in
Item 1A of our Annual Report on
Form 10-K,
as amended, for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006
except for the following, which have been updated in their
entirety:
In May
2006, the NIGC issued proposed regulations concerning
classification of gaming devices which could negatively affect
projected management/consulting fees to be received from the
Shingle Springs and Jamul Casino projects.
In May 2006, in response to the Department of Justice decision
not to proceed with its proposed legislation to amend the
Johnson Act, the NIGC proposed new regulations concerning the
classification of gaming devices. These proposed regulations, if
adopted, could restrict the types of gaming devices permitted as
Class II games under IGRA, and such restrictions could
limit the type of gaming devices planned to be used at the
Shingle Springs and Jamul Casinos. If the NIGC proposed
regulations were adopted as published, there is no assurance
that substitute allowable Class II gaming devices would
result in the same projected operating results as the
Class II gaming devices currently planned to be used by the
above-mentioned projects. If this were to occur it could have a
material adverse effect on our results of operations and
financial conditions. In February 2007, after receiving numerous
negative comments to the proposed regulations from tribes and
industry companies, the NIGC withdrew its proposed rules and
indicated it would attempt to review and modify the proposed
regulations and publish a new version at a later date.
On October 24, 2007, the NIGC published its revised
proposed rules concerning the classification of games and
companion proposed rules related to technical standards for
Class II gaming devices, revised definitions for
determining Class III gaming devices and minimum internal
control standards for Class II gaming. Together, these
proposed rules, if implemented and enforced, could materially
adversely affect the appeal and operating results of
Class II gaming devices currently planned to be used in the
above-mentioned projects. The comment period on the revised
proposed regulations is currently scheduled to expire in
December 2007, but may be extended until sometime during the
first quarter of 2008. The revised proposed regulations have
already received substantial criticism from tribes and industry
companies and lawsuits challenging the revised proposed
regulations are likely if final regulations substantially
similar to the proposed regulations are adopted; this could
delay the implementation of the proposed regulations for some
time or completely if the lawsuits are successful.
49
We
cannot guarantee the financial results of the expansion of the
World Poker Tour business, which may negatively impact our
financial results.
As of December 31, 2006, we, through our subsidiary Lakes
Poker Tour, LLC, owned approximately 61% of the outstanding
common stock of WPT Enterprises, Inc., referred to as WPTE. As a
result, our consolidated results included WPTE operations. We
cannot guarantee the financial results of the expansion of the
World Poker Tour business, which may negatively impact our
financial results. We can provide no assurance that WPTE will
achieve its forecasted revenues, that WPTE will be able to
expand its business, or that WPTEs operations will
positively impact our financial results because WPTEs
business is subject to many risks and uncertainties. These risks
include, but are not limited to, WPTEs significant
dependence on the Travel Channel as a current source of revenue
and GSN as a future source of revenue, and the risk that GSN
will not exercise its options to air seasons of the WPT series
beyond Season Six; difficulty of predicting the growth of
WPTEs online gaming business, which is a relatively new
industry with an increasing number of market entrants; reliance
on the efforts of CryptoLogic to develop and maintain
WPTEs online gaming website in compliance with WPTEs
business model and applicable gaming laws; the potential that
WPTEs television programming will fail to maintain a
sufficient audience; the risk that competitors with greater
financial resources or marketplace presence might develop
television programming that would directly compete with
WPTEs television programming; the risk that WPTE may not
be able to protect its entertainment concepts, current and
future brands and other intellectual property rights; risks
associated with future expansion into new or complementary
businesses; the termination or impairment of WPTEs
relationships with key licensing and strategic partners;
WPTEs dependence on its senior management team; and WPTE
is highly dependent on third-parties for the success of the WPT
Traktor Poker Tour in China and there is no guarantee that it
will be able to monetize its rights in China. The Unlawful
Internet Gambling Enforcement Act of 2006 prohibits online
gambling in the United States of America. Congress passing of
the Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act or future
government regulation of online gaming in the United States may
restrict the activities or affect the financial results of
WPTEs online gaming venture currently operating and
WPTEs new online gaming venture in development.
TRV had until April 1, 2007 to exercise its option to
broadcast Season Six of the WPT television series. TRV did not
exercise this option. On April 2, 2007, WPTE entered into
an agreement with the GSN, pursuant to which GSN agreed to
license Season Six for $300,000 per episode. The agreement also
provides GSN options for Seasons Seven and Eight.
In addition to the risks related to WPTEs business listed
above, WPTE has updated its risk factors on the following
matters:
|
|
|
|
|
On April 23, 2007, WPTE entered into an agreement with
CryptoLogic pursuant to which CryptoLogic operates and manages
WPTEs branded real-money gaming website,
WorldPokerTour.com, solely in jurisdictions where online gaming
is not restricted. WPTE cannot be assured that
CryptoLogics operation of the site going forward will meet
WPTEs business expectations, the failure of which would
have a material adverse impact on WPTEs online gaming
business.
|
|
|
|
WPTE is currently reliant on CryptoLogic for WPTEs gaming
website compliance with all applicable regulations, including
the initial verification that players who wish to wager are
actually from non-restricted countries. In addition, WPTE relies
on CryptoLogic and third party vendors to assure that players
cannot place improper wagers on an on-going basis. If
CryptoLogics compliance or verification is inadequate or
WPTEs third party verification tools fail, regulators in
the U.S. or other jurisdictions may impose fines or other
sanctions or threaten or take other actions that could adversely
affect WPTEs reputation and the revenues WPTE derives from
the license of rights to CryptoLogic. Additionally, certain
territories and foreign networks may restrict WPTE from
incorporating marketing elements related to WPTEs online
site into WPTEs international telecasts and certain laws
or regulations may restrict the type of advertising in general
in those territories. If these restrictions occur, WPTEs
costs of customer acquisition may be substantially higher than
anticipated.
|
|
|
|
WPTE has developed relationships with key strategic partners in
many areas of WPTEs business, including poker tournament
event sponsorship, merchandise licensing, corporate sponsorship,
Internet gaming and international distribution. If WPTE was to
fail to manage its existing licensing relationships, this
failure
|
50
|
|
|
|
|
could have a material adverse effect on WPTEs financial
condition and results of operations. WPTE relies on a limited
number of contracts under which third parties provide WPTE with
services vital to WPTEs business. If WPTEs
relationship with any third party was to be interrupted, or the
services provided by any third party were to be delayed or
deteriorate for any reason without being adequately replaced,
WPTE business could be materially adversely affected. If WPTE is
forced to find a replacement for any strategic partner, this
could create disruption in WPTEs business and may result
in reduced revenues, increased costs or diversion of
managements attention and resources. In addition, while
WPTE has significant control over its licensed products and
advertising, WPTE does not have operational and financial
control over third parties, and WPTE has limited influence with
respect to the manner in which they conduct their businesses. If
any strategic partner experiences a significant downturn in its
business or were otherwise unable to honor its obligations to
WPTE, WPTEs business could be materially disrupted.
|
|
|
|
|
|
WPTE intends to further expand business in foreign markets,
including continued international distribution of WPTEs
U.S. telecasts, creating additional poker tours in foreign
countries and distributing branded merchandise in foreign
countries. WPTEs international operations could be
adversely affected by changes in political and economic
conditions, trade protection measures and the status of
regulatory requirements that may restrict the sales of WPTE
products, increase costs of foreign production or other costs
that prohibit Internet gaming activities in international
jurisdictions. Also, changes in exchange rates between the
U.S. dollar and other currencies could potentially result
in significant increases in WPTE costs or decreases in earnings.
|
|
|
|
The success of WPTEs initiative in China will greatly
depend upon WPTEs ability to expand the brand and to
monetize WPTEs rights throughout the territory. WPTE is
highly dependent upon third-parties for the organization of
events, acquisition and use of certain business licenses
throughout China, the marketing of the WPT Traktor Poker Tour
and the licensing of WPTEs trademark and intellectual
property rights. If these
third-parties
fail to perform as anticipated, business operations in China
could be severely affected. Furthermore, there is no guarantee
that WPTE will be able to successfully enforce its rights in
China against any infringers of WPTE trademarks or other rights
granted to WPTE.
|
WPTE is highly dependent upon the CLSACs performance of
its obligations under its contract, which include organizing WPT
Traktor Poker Tour events, securing placement of the
championship finals on a major Chinese Television station, and
promoting the tour. Failure of the CLSAC to properly support the
tour could severely impact WPTEs ability to generate
revenue in China. Moreover, even if the tournaments attract a
large number of participants, WPTE cannot guarantee that this
will translate into significant revenue for WPTE.
For a complete listing of WPTEs risk factors, see its
Annual Report on
Form 10-K,
as amended, for the year ended December 31, 2006, and its
Quarterly Reports on
Form 10-Q
for the quarters ended April 1, 2007, as amended,
July 1, 2007, as amended, and September 30, 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibits
|
|
Description
|
|
|
31
|
.1
|
|
Certification of CEO pursuant to Securities Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e) as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
|
31
|
.2
|
|
Certification of CFO pursuant to Securities Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e) as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
|
32
|
.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
51
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, the registrant has duly caused this report on
Form 10-Q
to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly
authorized.
LAKES ENTERTAINMENT, INC.
Registrant
Lyle Berman
Chairman of the Board and
Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
Timothy J. Cope
President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
Dated: November 9, 2007
52