Golden Growers Cooperative - Quarter Report: 2017 March (Form 10-Q)

 

 

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

FORM 10-Q

 

☒ Quarterly report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

 

For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2017

 

Commission file number:  000-53957

 

Golden Growers Cooperative

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

 

1002 Main Avenue West, Suite 5

West Fargo, ND 58078

(Address of principal executive offices)

 

Telephone Number 701-281-0468

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months, and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  

 

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).  

 

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.  See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

 

 

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐ 

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in rule 12b-2 of the Act).

 

 

As of May 11, 2017  the Cooperative had 15,490,480 Units issued and outstanding.

 

 

 

 

GOLDEN GROWERS COOPERATIVE

 

FORM 10-Q

 

INDEX

 

 

 

 

                  PART I.  FINANCIAL INFORMATION

 

Item 1.  Financial Statements

 

GOLDEN GROWERS COOPERATIVE

BALANCE SHEETS

(In Thousands)

 

 

 

 

See Notes to Financial Statements

 

 

 

GOLDEN GROWERS COOPERATIVE

STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

(In Thousands, Other Than Share and Per-Share Data)

(Unaudited)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

See Notes to Financial Statements

 

GOLDEN GROWERS COOPERATIVE

STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(In Thousands)

(Unaudited)

 

 

 

 

See Notes to Financial Statements

 

 

 

 

 

GOLDEN GROWERS COOPERATIVE

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2017 AND 2016

 

NOTE 1 – BASIS OF PRESENTATION

 

The financial statements of the Golden Growers Cooperative (the “Cooperative”) for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2017 and 2016 are unaudited and reflect all adjustments consisting of normal recurring adjustments which are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair presentation of the financial position and operating results for the interim period. The condensed financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto, contained in the Cooperative’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016. The results of operations for the periods ended March 31, 2017 are not necessarily indicative of the results for the entire fiscal year ending December 31, 2017.

 

NOTE 2 – EXPENSES

 

The Cooperative contracts with Cargill, Incorporated (“Cargill”) in connection with the procurement of corn and other agency services for an annual fee of $92,000, which is paid by the Cooperative to Cargill in quarterly installments and terminates on December 31, 2017.

 

NOTE 3 – PROGOLD LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY

 

The Cooperative has a 49% ownership interest in ProGold Limited Liability Company (“ProGold LLC”).  Following is summary financial information for ProGold LLC, which were derived from the monthly unaudited financial statements of ProGold LLC:

 

 

 

 

 

 

NOTE 4 – INVESTMENTS

 

Fair value is defined as the price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date.  Quoted market prices are generally not available for the Company’s financial instruments.  Fair values are based on judgments regarding anticipated cash flows, future expected loss experience, current economic conditions, risk characteristics of various financial instruments and other factors.  These estimates involve uncertainties and matters of judgment, and therefore, cannot be determined with precision.  Changes in assumptions could significantly affect the estimates.

 

The Cooperative has determined fair value of its investments held to maturity based on Level 1 inputs.  The Cooperative’s investments held to maturity are as follows as of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 (in thousands):

 

 

 

 

NOTE 5 – EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS

 

Pension Plan – In December 2012, the Cooperative approved a change to freeze the Cooperative’s defined benefit plan. As a result, no additional benefits will accrue to participants in the plan and no new employees are eligible for the plan.

 

The following schedules provide the components of Net Periodic Benefit Cost for the three-months ended March 31, 2017 and March 31, 2016 (in thousands):  

 

 

 

 

Through the three-months ended March 31, 2017, the Cooperative has made $0 in contributions as compared to $6,000 through the three-months ended March 31, 2016.  The Cooperative anticipates $9,000 in contributions in 2017. Contributions in 2016 totaled $20,000.

 

NOTE 6 – RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

 

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09, Revenues from Contracts with Customers. The new revenue guidance broadly replaces the revenue guidance provided throughout the Codification.  The core principle of the revenue guidance is that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services.  To achieve that core principle, an entity should apply the following steps: (1) identify the contract(s) with a customer, (2) identify the performance obligations in the contract, (3) determine the transaction price, (4) allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract, and (5) recognize revenue when (or as) the entity satisfies a performance obligation.  The new revenue guidance also requires the capitalization of certain contract acquisition costs.  Reporting entities must prepare new disclosures providing qualitative and quantitative information on the nature, amount, timing, and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from contracts with customers.  New disclosures also include qualitative and quantitative information on significant judgments, changes in judgments, and contract acquisition assets. At issuance, ASU 2014-09 was effective starting in 2017 for calendar-year public entities, and interim periods within that year. In August 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-14, Revenue from Contracts with Customers: Deferral of the Effective Date, which defers the adoption of ASU 2014-09 to annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim reporting periods within that reporting period. Earlier application is permitted only as of annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim reporting periods within that reporting period. During the fourth quarter of 2016, the Cooperative completed the initial evaluation of the new standard and the related assessment and review of existing revenue contracts with its customers. The Cooperative determined, on a preliminary basis, that the timing, pattern and amount of revenue recognized during the year should remain substantially the same.  The Cooperative anticipates utilizing the full retrospective transition method. The primary impact of the adoption on the Cooperative’s financial statements will be the additional required disclosures around revenue recognition in the notes to the financial statements.

 

NOTE 7 – CHANGE IN ACCOUNTING STANDARDS

 

The Cooperative has not been impacted by any changes in Accounting Standards since the filing of its most recent 10-K.

 

NOTE 8 – DISTRIBUTIONS TO MEMBERS

 

On February 16, 2017, the Cooperative made distributions to its members totaling $2,215,139 or $0.143 per outstanding membership unit. Traditionally, the Cooperative has issued distributions near $0.20/bushel.  This year, however, the Cooperative issued a distribution equal to 30% of allocated income, the minimum amount required to be distributed according to the Cooperative’s Bylaws, because the ProGold LLC Board of Governors voted in January 2017 to suspend automatic distributions to its partners until such time as a final decision had been made for the use of its corn wet-milling facility starting on January 1, 2018. For more information on the lease of ProGold LLC’s wet-milling facility to Cargill, see Note 10 to the Financial Statements, Subsequent Events, below.

 

NOTE 9 – COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

 

The Cooperative contracted with Cargill in connection with the procurement of corn which includes an annual fee of $92,000 paid by the Cooperative to Cargill in quarterly installments and terminates December 31, 2017.

 

NOTE 10 – SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

 

The Cooperative, Cargill, and American Crystal Sugar Company (“American Crystal”) have entered into a Consent Agreement dated as of April 4, 2017 to be effective on January 1, 2018 relating to the lease of ProGold LLC’s wet-milling facility to Cargill and the Cooperative’s interest in ProGold LLC. ProGold LLC and Cargill entered into a Second Amended and Restated Facility Lease (as further described below), and Cargill and American Crystal entered into an Option Agreement dated as of April 4, 2017 to be effective on January 1, 2018 detailing the price, term and other conditions under which American Crystal grants to Cargill an exclusive option to purchase a 50% interest in ProGold LLC from American Crystal during the first four years of the lease.

 

Under the Consent Agreement, the Cooperative approves and consents to the transfer of the 50% interest in ProGold LLC from American Crystal to Cargill in the event Cargill exercises its option.  The Cooperative also secures the right to purchase American Crystal’s remaining 1% interest in ProGold LLC for a base price ranging from $1.7 million to $1.3  million, depending on when Cargill notifies American Crystal of its intention to exercise its option.  The Cooperative would also be required to pay to American Crystal a capital adjustment in an amount equal to 1% of the portion of costs that have not been paid by Cargill to ProGold LLC through additional rent with respect to certain projects at the facility.  In the event Cargill intends to exercise its option, before exercising such option, Cargill and the Cooperative will expeditiously and in good faith work together to finalize agreements for the structure, governance and operation of ProGold LLC according to certain operational principles and other guideline terms as provided in a Memorandum of Understanding attached to the Consent Agreement.

 

The Second Amended and Restated Facility Lease entered into by ProGold LLC and Cargill dated as of April 4, 2017 commences on January 1, 2018 and continues through December 31, 2022. The lease will be automatically extended for one year in the event that either (i) Cargill has not, prior to December 31, 2021, exercised the option to purchase American Crystal’s 50% interest in ProGold LLC or (ii) if the parties have not otherwise mutually agreed to extend or terminate the lease.

 

Cargill will pay ProGold LLC annual rent of $17 million in 2018 and 2019, $16 million in 2020, $15.5 million in 2021 and 2022, and $14 million if the lease is extended through 2023 as described above.

 

In connection with renewing the lease between ProGold LLC and Cargill, ProGold LLC has agreed to pay at least $750,000 annually for infrastructure maintenance and may also be required to pay additional sums in order to make certain capital improvements.  The payments will reduce any income available for ProGold LLC’s members at the time of such expenses.  The Cooperative and American Crystal would experience any such reduction in ProGold LLC’s income proportionately based on their percentage ownership of ProGold LLC.

Item 2.  Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

 

The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto included in Item 1 of Part I of this report and the audited consolidated financial statements and related notes thereto and Item 7, Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Conditions and Results of Operations, included in the Cooperative’s Annual Report Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016.  This report contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties.  Such forward-looking statements include, among others, those statements including the words “expect”, “anticipate”, “believe”, “may” and similar expressions.  The Cooperative’s actual results could differ materially from those indicated.  See the discussion of risk factors in Item 1A, Risk Factors, included in the Cooperative’s Annual Report for the 2016 fiscal year on Form 10-K.  The Cooperative does not intend to update the forward-looking statements contained in this report other than as required by law and qualifies all of its forward-looking statements by these cautionary statements.

 

Overview

 

Golden Growers Cooperative is a value added agricultural cooperative association governed under Minnesota Statutes Chapter 308B owned by 1,554 members in the business of providing value to our members by facilitating their delivery of corn to the corn wet-milling facility owned by ProGold Limited Liability Company (“ProGold LLC”), a Minnesota limited liability company in which the Cooperative owns a 49% membership interest.  ProGold LLC leases its corn wet milling facility to Cargill Incorporated (“Cargill”) who uses the facility to process corn into high fructose corn syrup.  We accomplish our business on behalf of our members through our contract relationships with all of the parties involved in the ownership and operation of the facility.  From an income production perspective, our membership interest in ProGold LLC is our primary asset that, in addition to giving us the right to receive distributions from ProGold LLC, also provides our members with additional value for the delivery of their corn for processing.  Annually, we are required to deliver approximately 15,490,480 bushels of corn to Cargill for processing at the ProGold LLC facility.

 

Any person residing in the United States can own our Units as long as that person delivers or provides for the delivery of corn for processing at the ProGold LLC facility. Ownership of our membership units requires our members to deliver corn to the Cooperative for processing in proportion to the number of units each member holds. Currently, 15,490,480 of our units are issued and outstanding.  The Cooperative’s income and losses are allocated to our members based on the volume of corn they deliver.  Subject to certain limitations, as long as a member patronizes the Cooperative by delivering corn equal to the number of units held by the member, the member will be allocated a corresponding portion of our income (or loss).  In this way, we operate on a cooperative basis.

 

To hold our units, a member is required to execute a Uniform Member Agreement that obligates the member to deliver corn to us and an Annual Delivery Agreement by which each member annually elects the member’s method to deliver corn — either Method A or Method B, or a combination of both.  Under Method A, a member is required to physically deliver the required bushels of corn to us either at the facility or another location designated by the Cooperative.  Under Method B, a member appoints us as its agent to arrange for the acquisition and delivery of the required bushels of corn on the member’s behalf.  We appoint Cargill as our agent to arrange for the delivery of the corn by our members who elect to deliver corn using Method A, and we appoint Cargill as our agent to acquire corn on our behalf for our members who elect to deliver corn using Method B.  If a member elects to deliver corn using Method B, the price per bushel the Cooperative pays to the member is equal to the price per bushel paid by Cargill to acquire the corn as our agent.  Members who deliver corn under Method A are paid the market price or contracted price for their corn at the time of delivery.  Members who deliver corn under Method A receive from the Cooperative an incentive payment of $.05 per bushel on the corn that they deliver while members who elect Method B to deliver corn pay to the Cooperative a $.02 per bushel agency fee for the cost of having us deliver corn on their behalf.  The incentive payment for Method A deliveries and the agency fee for Method B deliveries are subject to annual adjustment at the sole discretion of our Board of Directors. While the Cooperative is financially responsible for the various payments to the members for corn, Cargill, serving as the Cooperative’s administrative agent, issues payments to members for corn on the Cooperative’s behalf.

 

Annually, we notify Cargill of the volume of Method A corn to be delivered by each Method A member.  Once we provide notification to Cargill of the volume of corn, Cargill then confirms the amount of corn with each member and notifies that member with respect to quality specifications, allowances, deductions and premiums to be applicable to that corn.  The Method A member then directly contracts with Cargill for the contract price agreed upon for the corn or, in the absence of an agreed upon price, the market price per bushel for corn delivered on the day on which the corn is delivered and accepted at the facility.  With respect to all Method A corn that is delivered, Cargill pays to the

Cooperative the aggregate purchase price for corn purchased from our members, and then, on our behalf, makes individual payments for corn directly to our members.  In the event a Method A member delivers to Cargill more than its delivery commitment, any corn delivered in excess of that commitment is handled as a direct sale of corn to Cargill and is priced at the current closing delivery corn price established by Cargill at the facility on the day it is unloaded.  In the event a Method A member delivers to Cargill less than its committed amount of corn, the quantity of the shortfall is then purchased and delivered by Cargill on our behalf, but this purchased corn is not credited to the Method A member’s account.  If a Method A member fails to fully satisfy the corn delivery requirement, Cargill purchases replacement corn for which we reimburse Cargill the amount by which the underlying contracted corn price is less than the price of buying the replacement corn that was due on the delivery date.  In addition, if a Method A member fails to deliver all of the corn it was obligated to deliver, that member’s allocation of our profit or losses and any cash distributions is proportionately reduced and we may terminate the member’s membership.

 

Our Bylaws establish a Method A delivery pool and a Method B delivery pool.  Generally, our income and/or losses are allocated annually based on the percentage of bushels of corn our members elect to deliver using either Method A or Method B.  Regardless of the actual percentage allocation between our members who deliver bushels of corn using Method A or Method B, our Bylaws require us to annually allocate at least 25% of our income and/or losses to the Method A pool.  The amount of our income and/or losses actually allocated to the Method A pool is a percentage equal to the greater of 25% or the actual percentage of bushels of corn delivered by our members using Method A.

 

For the 2017 fiscal year, members elected to deliver 29% of their corn by Method A and members elected to deliver 71% of their corn by Method B.  This election will result in 29% of the Cooperative’s income and/or losses and 29% of any cash distributions being allocated to the Method A pool in fiscal year 2017, which reflects the actual percentage of corn members elected to deliver using Method A and does not result in reallocation to meet the 25% requirement set forth in our governing documents.

 

Results of Operations

 

Revenues. The Cooperative derives revenue from two sources: operations related to the marketing of members’ corn and income derived from the Cooperative’s membership interest in ProGold LLC.  The corn marketing operations generate revenue for the Cooperative equal to the value of the corn that is delivered to Cargill. The Cooperative recognizes expense equal to this same amount which results in the corn marketing operations being revenue neutral to the Cooperative, except for revenue from the Method B agency fee and expenses related to the Method A incentive payments, required licensing and bonding expenses, and the service fee paid to Cargill.

 

For the three-months ended March 31, 2017, the Cooperative sold approximately 4.3 million bushels of corn compared to 4.4 million bushels of corn sold during the three-months ended March 31, 2016.

 

For the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, the Cooperative recognized corn revenue of $17,367,000 and $17,795,000, respectively, a decrease of 2%, due primarily to a decrease in the selling price per bushel of corn sold in 2017 compared to 2016.  The Cooperative recognized corn expense of $17,390,000 and $17,817,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016 respectively, a decrease of 2% due primarily to a decrease in the cost per bushel of corn purchased in 2017 compared to 2016.  For the three-months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, its members, on the Cooperative’s behalf, delivered to Cargill for processing at the facility 1,547,000 and 1,554,000 bushels of corn respectively using Method A, and 2,788,000 and 2,807,000 bushels of corn respectively, using Method B. For the three-months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, the Cooperative recognized expense of $23,000 and $23,000, respectively, in connection with costs incurred to Cargill related to the Cooperative’s corn marketing operation.

 

Income from ProGold LLC.  The Cooperative derived income from ProGold LLC for the three-months ended March 31, 2017, of $2,355,000 compared to $1,371,000 for the three-months ended March 31, 2016, an increase of 71% due primarily to a reduction in ProGold LLC depreciation expense in 2017 compared to 2016.

 

General and Administrative Expenses. The Cooperative’s general and administrative expenses include salaries and benefits, professional fees and fees paid to our board of directors. The general and administrative expenses for the three-months ended March 31, 2017, was $206,000 compared to $169,000 for the three-months ended March 31, 2016 primarily based on timing differences in payments as compared to 2016.

 

Interest Income. Interest income for the three-months ended March 31, 2017, was $2,000 compared to $2,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2016.

 

Liquidity and Capital Resources

 

The Cooperative’s working capital at March 31, 2017 was $689,000 compared to $1,891,000 at March 31, 2016. The reduced working capital in the first quarter of 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016 was due to the fact that the Cooperative received no cash distributions from ProGold LLC for the three-month period ended March 31, 2017 compared to $2,650,000 for the three-month period ended March 31, 2016.    The ProGold LLC Board of Governors voted in January 2017 to suspend automatic distributions to its partners until such time as a final decision had been made for the use of its corn wet-milling facility starting on January 1, 2018. For more information on the lease of ProGold LLC’s wet-milling facility to Cargill, see Note 10 to the Financial Statements, Subsequent Events, included in Item 1 of Part I of this report.

 

ProGold’s suspension of automatic distributions also affected the Cooperative’s use of cash flows and cash distributions to the Cooperative’s members. The Cooperative used operating cash flows of $576,000 for the three-month period ended March 31, 2017 compared to $36,000 for the three-month period ended March 31, 2016 and paid cash distributions to its members totaling $2,215,000 for the three-month period ended March 31, 2017 compared to $3,098,000 for the three-month period ended March 31, 2016. The Cooperative’s reduced distribution, equal to 30% of allocated income, was the minimum amount required to be distributed according to the Cooperative’s Bylaws.

 

The Cooperative had no long-term debt as of March 31, 2017 and March 31, 2016.

 

Management believes that non-cash working capital levels are appropriate in the current business environment and does not expect a significant increase or reduction of non-cash working capital in the next 12-months.

 

Significant Accounting Estimates and Policies

 

The Cooperative generally does not pay out Method A incentive payments or collect Method B agency fees until the end of its fiscal year.  These amounts are accrued quarterly and then confirmed at the end of the fiscal year.  The total annual Method B agency fee was determinable once the members completed their delivery method determination prior to January 1, 2017.  The quarterly Method B bushel delivery and agency fee revenue is calculated by allocating the portion of the total annual agency fee for that particular quarter or cumulating it for the particular period.  The Cooperative tracks Method A corn deliveries throughout the year so it can report the bushels of corn delivered by its members as well as the corresponding Method A incentive fees earned.  The final amounts owed by or due to Cargill and/or the Cooperative’s members who elect to deliver using Method A is not calculated until after December 31 in order to account for any failures to deliver or over-deliveries of corn.

 

The remainder of the Cooperative’s significant accounting policies are described in Note 2, Summary of Significant Accounting Polices, of the Notes to the Financial Statements included in the Cooperative’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2016.  The Cooperative’s critical accounting estimates are discussed in Item 7, Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Conditions and Results of Operations, included in the Cooperative’s Annual Report Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016.  There has been no significant change in the Cooperative’s significant accounting policies or critical accounting estimates since the end of fiscal 2016.

 

Off Balance Sheet Arrangements

 

None.

 

 

Item 3.  Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

 

Market risk is the risk of loss to future earnings, to fair values or to future cash flows that may result from changes in the price of a financial instrument.  The value of a financial instrument may change as a result of changes in the interest rates, exchange rates, commodity prices, equity prices and other market changes.  Market risk is attributed to all market risk-sensitive financial instruments, including long term debt.

 

Due to the pass through nature of the Cooperative’s marketing of its members’ corn, the Cooperative does not believe that it is subject to any material market risk exposure with respect to interest rates, exchange rates, commodity prices, equity prices and other market changes that would require disclosure under this item.

 

Item 4.  Controls and Procedures

 

The Cooperative’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer has reviewed and evaluated the effectiveness of the Cooperative’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 240.13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) as of March 31, 2017.  Based on that review and evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer has concluded that the Cooperative’s current disclosure controls and procedures, as designed and implemented, are effective and provide reasonable assurance that information relating to the Cooperative required to be disclosed in the reports the Cooperative files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms, including ensuring that such information is accumulated and communicated to the Cooperative’s management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.  There were no changes in the Cooperative’s internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during the Cooperative’s most recent fiscal quarter that may have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Cooperative’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

PART II.  OTHER INFORMATION

 

Item 1.  Legal Proceedings

 

None.

 

Item 1A.  Risk Factors

 

For a detailed discussion of certain risk factors that could affect the Cooperative’s operations, financial condition or results for future periods, see Item 1A, Risk Factors, in the Cooperative’s Annual Report for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016 on Form 10-K.

 

Item 2.  Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

 

None.

 

Item 3.  Defaults Upon Senior Securities

 

None.

 

Item 4.  Mine Safety Disclosures

 

None.

 

Item 5.  Other Information.

 

None.

 

Item 6.  Exhibits

 

 

 

SIGNATURES

 

Pursuant to the requirement of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.