Granite Falls Energy, LLC - Quarter Report: 2009 April (Form 10-Q)
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
o Quarterly report under Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. |
|
For the fiscal quarter ended April 30, 2009 |
|
o Transition report under Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act of 1934. |
Commission file number 00051277
GRANITE FALLS ENERGY, LLC
(Name of small business issuer in its charter)
Minnesota |
|
41-1997390 |
(State or other jurisdiction of |
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
|
|
|
15045 Highway 23 SE |
|
|
Granite Falls, MN |
|
56241-0216 |
(Address of principal executive offices) |
|
(Zip Code) |
320-564-3100
(Issuers telephone
number)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. x Yes o No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). o Yes o No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer o |
|
Accelerated filer o |
|
|
|
Non-accelerated filer x |
|
Smaller reporting company o |
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). o Yes x No
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date: As of June 1, 2009 there were 30,656 membership units outstanding.
2
PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
GRANITE FALLS ENERGY, LLC
Condensed Balance Sheets
|
|
April 30, |
|
October 31, |
|
||
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
||
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
|
||
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Current Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Cash |
|
$ |
440,859 |
|
$ |
37,773 |
|
Restricted cash |
|
1,418,487 |
|
1,000,000 |
|
||
Accounts receivable - primarily related party |
|
2,425,411 |
|
3,790,454 |
|
||
Inventory |
|
3,734,486 |
|
3,875,324 |
|
||
Derivative instruments |
|
14,923 |
|
568,822 |
|
||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
256,541 |
|
110,411 |
|
||
Total current assets |
|
8,290,707 |
|
9,382,784 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Property, Plant and Equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Land and improvements |
|
3,490,107 |
|
3,490,107 |
|
||
Railroad improvements |
|
4,127,738 |
|
4,127,738 |
|
||
Process equipment and tanks |
|
59,221,289 |
|
59,140,218 |
|
||
Administration building |
|
279,734 |
|
279,734 |
|
||
Office equipment |
|
135,912 |
|
135,912 |
|
||
Rolling stock |
|
563,007 |
|
563,007 |
|
||
Construction in progress |
|
193,908 |
|
92,557 |
|
||
|
|
68,011,695 |
|
67,829,273 |
|
||
Less accumulated depreciation |
|
22,337,938 |
|
19,181,232 |
|
||
Net property, plant and equipment |
|
45,673,757 |
|
48,648,041 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Other Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Deferred financing costs, net of amortization |
|
34,294 |
|
35,694 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Total Assets |
|
$ |
53,998,758 |
|
$ |
58,066,519 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
LIABILITIES AND MEMBERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Current Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Current portion of long-term debt |
|
$ |
74,362 |
|
$ |
73,771 |
|
Revolving line of credit |
|
2,090,000 |
|
2,560,500 |
|
||
Accounts payable |
|
1,227,093 |
|
1,351,695 |
|
||
Corn payable to FCE - related party |
|
1,124,619 |
|
|
|
||
Due to broker |
|
|
|
238,581 |
|
||
Derivative instruments |
|
99,970 |
|
|
|
||
Accrued liabilities |
|
539,886 |
|
1,884,085 |
|
||
Total current liabilities |
|
5,155,930 |
|
6,108,632 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Long-Term Debt, less current portion |
|
407,767 |
|
445,097 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Commitments and Contingencies |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Members Equity, 30,656 and 31,156 units authorized, issued, and outstanding, respectively |
|
48,435,061 |
|
51,512,790 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Total Liabilities and Members Equity |
|
$ |
53,998,758 |
|
$ |
58,066,519 |
|
Notes to the Unaudited Condensed Financial Statements are an integral part of this Statement.
3
GRANITE FALLS ENERGY, LLC
Condensed Statements of Operations
|
|
Three Months |
|
Three Months |
|
||
|
|
Ended |
|
Ended |
|
||
|
|
April 30, |
|
April 30, |
|
||
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
||
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
(Unaudited) |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Revenues |
|
$ |
21,529,863 |
|
$ |
19,018,497 |
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Cost of Goods Sold |
|
22,089,595 |
* |
19,027,679 |
* |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Gross Loss |
|
(559,732 |
) |
(9,182 |
) |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Operating Expenses |
|
518,509 |
|
566,866 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Operating Loss |
|
(1,078,241 |
) |
(576,048 |
) |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Other Income (Expense) |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Other income |
|
31,339 |
|
43,824 |
|
||
Interest income |
|
2,468 |
|
6,883 |
|
||
Interest expense |
|
(26,809 |
) |
(27,545 |
) |
||
Total other income, net |
|
6,998 |
|
23,162 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net Loss |
|
$ |
(1,071,243 |
) |
$ |
(552,886 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Weighted Average Units Outstanding - Basic and Diluted |
|
30,656 |
|
31,156 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net Loss Per Unit - Basic and Diluted |
|
$ |
(34.94 |
) |
$ |
(17.75 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Distributions Per Unit - Basic and Diluted |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
* Primarily related party
Notes to the Unaudited Condensed Financial Statements are an integral part of this Statement.
4
GRANITE FALLS ENERGY, LLC
Condensed Statements of Operations
|
|
Six Months |
|
Six Months |
|
||
|
|
Ended |
|
Ended |
|
||
|
|
April 30, |
|
April 30, |
|
||
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
||
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
(Unaudited) |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Revenues |
|
$ |
42,312,605 |
|
$ |
43,317,367 |
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Cost of Goods Sold |
|
43,161,411 |
* |
39,910,492 |
* |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Gross Profit (Loss) |
|
(848,806 |
) |
3,406,875 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Operating Expenses |
|
1,039,484 |
|
1,222,296 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Operating Income (Loss) |
|
(1,888,290 |
) |
2,184,579 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Other Income (Expense): |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Other income (expense), net |
|
(631,503 |
) |
43,426 |
|
||
Interest income |
|
5,706 |
|
25,437 |
|
||
Interest expense |
|
(63,642 |
) |
(75,548 |
) |
||
Total other expense, net |
|
(689,439 |
) |
(6,685 |
) |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net Income (Loss) |
|
$ |
(2,577,729 |
) |
$ |
2,177,894 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Weighted Average Units Outstanding - Basic and Diluted |
|
30,907 |
|
31,156 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net Income (Loss) Per Unit - Basic and Diluted |
|
$ |
(83.40 |
) |
$ |
69.90 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Distributions Per Unit - Basic and Diluted |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
* Primarily related party
Notes to Unaudited Condensed Financial Statements are an integral part of this Statement.
5
GRANITE FALLS ENERGY, LLC
Condensed Statements of Cash Flows
|
|
Six Months |
|
Six Months |
|
||
|
|
Ended |
|
Ended |
|
||
|
|
April 30, |
|
April 30, |
|
||
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
||
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
(unaudited) |
|
||
Cash Flows from Operating Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
(2,577,729 |
) |
$ |
2,177,894 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Depreciation and amortization |
|
3,158,106 |
|
3,365,486 |
|
||
Change in fair value of derivative instruments |
|
128,451 |
|
(1,686,025 |
) |
||
Changes in assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Restricted cash |
|
(418,487 |
) |
(1,115,524 |
) |
||
Derivative instruments |
|
525,418 |
|
5,596,181 |
|
||
Accounts receivable |
|
865,043 |
|
332,903 |
|
||
Inventory |
|
140,838 |
|
(1,208,603 |
) |
||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
(146,130 |
) |
65,638 |
|
||
Accounts payable |
|
1,000,017 |
|
364,635 |
|
||
Due to broker |
|
(238,581 |
) |
|
|
||
Accrued liabilities |
|
(1,344,199 |
) |
(212,638 |
) |
||
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities |
|
1,092,747 |
|
7,679,947 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Cash Flows from Investing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Capital expenditures |
|
(81,071 |
) |
(88,708 |
) |
||
Construction in process |
|
(101,351 |
) |
(138,528 |
) |
||
Net Cash Used in Investing Activities |
|
(182,422 |
) |
(227,236 |
) |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Cash Flows from Financing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Payments on revolving line of credit, net |
|
(470,500 |
) |
|
|
||
Payments on long-term debt |
|
(36,739 |
) |
(36,163 |
) |
||
Member distributions paid |
|
|
|
(6,231,200 |
) |
||
Net Cash Used in Financing Activities |
|
(507,239 |
) |
(6,267,363 |
) |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net Increase in Cash |
|
403,086 |
|
1,185,348 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Cash Beginning of Period |
|
37,773 |
|
3,963,425 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Cash End of Period |
|
$ |
440,859 |
|
$ |
5,148,773 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Supplemental Cash Flow Information |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Cash paid during the period for: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Interest expense |
|
$ |
52,833 |
|
$ |
66,793 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Supplemental Disclosure of Noncash Investing, Operating and Financing Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Accounts receivable offset by repurchase of membership units |
|
$ |
500,000 |
|
$ |
|
|
Notes to the Unaudited Condensed Financial Statements are an integral part of this Statement.
6
GRANITE FALLS ENERGY, LLC
Notes to Unaudited Condensed Financial Statements
April 30, 2009
1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Basis of Presentation
The accompanying condensed balance sheet as of October 31, 2008 is derived from audited financial statements. The unaudited interim condensed financial statements of Granite Falls Energy, LLC (the Company) reflect all adjustments consisting only of normal recurring adjustments that are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair presentation of their financial position and results of operations and cash flows. The results for the three and six month periods ended April 30, 2009 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for a full fiscal year. Certain information and note disclosures normally included in annual financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP) are condensed or omitted pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), although the Company believes that the disclosures made are adequate to make the information not misleading. These condensed financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Companys audited financial statements and notes thereto included in its annual report for the year ended October 31, 2008 filed on Form 10-K with the SEC.
Nature of Business
Granite Falls Energy, LLC (GFE) is a Minnesota limited liability company operating an ethanol manufacturing facility near Granite Falls, Minnesota. The Company produces and sells fuel ethanol and distillers grains, a co-product of the fuel ethanol production process, in the continental United States. GFEs plant has an approximate production capacity of 50 million gallons per year.
Accounting Estimates
Management uses estimates and assumptions in preparing these condensed financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America. Those estimates and assumptions affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities, and the reported revenues and expenses. The Company uses estimates and assumptions in accounting for the following significant matters, among others: economic lives of property, plant, and equipment; realizability of accounts receivable; valuation of derivatives, inventory, and analysis of long-lived assets impairment. Actual results may differ from previously estimated amounts, and such differences may be material to our condensed financial statements. The Company periodically reviews estimates and assumptions, and the effects of revisions are reflected in the period in which the revision is made.
Revenue Recognition
The Company sells ethanol and related products pursuant to marketing agreements. Revenues from the production of ethanol and the related products are recorded when the customer has taken title and assumed the risks and rewards of ownership, prices are fixed or determinable and collectability is reasonably assured. Title is generally assumed by the buyer at the Companys shipping point.
In accordance with the Companys agreements for the marketing and sale of ethanol and related products, marketing fees and commissions due to the marketers are deducted from the gross sales price as earned. These fees and commissions are recorded net of revenues as they do not provide an identifiable benefit that is sufficiently separable from the sale of ethanol and related products. Shipping costs incurred by the Company in the sale of ethanol are not specifically identifiable and as a result, are recorded based on the net selling price reported to the Company from the marketer. Shipping costs incurred by the Company in the sale of ethanol related products are included in cost of goods sold.
Ethanol marketing fees and commissions totaled approximately $177,000 and $149,000 for the three month periods ended April 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Ethanol marketing fees and commissions totaled approximately $326,000, and $331,000 for the six month periods ended April 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Distillers grain marketing fees and commissions totaled approximately $30,000 and $53,000 for the three month periods ended
7
GRANITE FALLS ENERGY, LLC
Notes to Unaudited Condensed Financial Statements
April 30, 2009
April 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Distillers grain marketing fees and commissions totaled approximately $70,000 and $75,000 for the six month periods ended April 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
Long-Lived Assets
Property, plant, and equipment are stated at cost. Depreciation is provided over estimated useful lives by use of the straight line method. Maintenance and repairs are expensed as incurred. Major improvements and betterments are capitalized.
Long-lived assets, such as property, plant, and equipment, and purchased intangible assets subject to amortization, are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. If circumstances require a long-lived asset be tested for possible impairment, the Company first compares undiscounted cash flows expected to be generated by an asset to the carrying value of the asset. If the carrying value of the long-lived asset is not recoverable on an undiscounted cash flow basis, impairment is recognized to the extent that the carrying value exceeds its fair value. Fair value is determined through various valuation techniques including, but not limited to, discounted cash flow models, quoted market values and third-party independent appraisals, as considered necessary.
The Company currently owns and operates an ethanol plant that has an approximate production capacity of 50 million gallons per year. The carrying value of these facilities at April 30, 2009 was approximately $46 million. In accordance with the Companys policy for evaluating impairment of long-lived assets described above, management has evaluated the recoverability of the facilities based on projected future cash flows from operations over the facilities estimated useful lives. Management has determined that the projected future undiscounted cash flows from operations of these facilities exceed their carrying value at April 30, 2009; therefore, no impairment loss was indicated or recognized. In determining the projected future undiscounted cash flows, the Company has made significant assumptions concerning the future viability of the ethanol industry, the future price of corn in relation to the future price of ethanol and the overall demand in relation to production and supply capacity.
Derivative Instruments
From time to time the Company enters into derivative transactions to hedge its exposures to commodity price fluctuations. The Company accounts for derivatives in accordance with SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities. SFAS No. 133 requires the recognition of derivatives in the balance sheet and the measurement of these instruments at fair value.
In order for a derivative to qualify as a hedge, specific criteria must be met and appropriate documentation maintained. Gains and losses from derivatives that do not qualify as hedges, or are undesignated, must be recognized immediately in earnings. If the derivative does qualify as a hedge, depending on the nature of the hedge, changes in the fair value of the derivative will be either offset against the change in fair value of the hedged assets, liabilities, or firm commitments through earnings or recognized in other comprehensive income until the hedged item is recognized in earnings. Changes in the fair value of undesignated derivatives are recorded in revenue or cost of goods sold based on the commodity being hedged.
Additionally, SFAS No. 133 requires a company to evaluate its contracts to determine whether the contracts are derivatives. Certain contracts that literally meet the definition of a derivative may be exempted as normal purchases or normal sales. Normal purchases and normal sales are contracts that provide for the purchase or sale of something other than a financial instrument or derivative instrument that will be delivered in quantities expected to be used or sold over a reasonable period in the normal course of business. Certain corn and distillers grains contracts that meet the requirements of normal purchases or sales are documented as normal and exempted from the accounting and reporting requirements of SFAS No. 133, and therefore, are not marked to market in the financial statements.
8
GRANITE FALLS ENERGY, LLC
Notes to Unaudited Condensed Financial Statements
April 30, 2009
During the first quarter of 2008, the FASB issued FASB Statement No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, an amendment of FAS Statement No. 133 (SFAS 161). This statement requires holders of derivative instruments to provide qualitative disclosures about objectives and strategies for using derivatives, quantitative disclosures about fair value amounts of gains and losses from derivative instruments, and disclosures about credit-risk-related contingent features in derivative agreements. The Company adopted this statement effective in the three months ended April 30, 2009. See further discussion in Note 4.
2. RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES
The Company has certain risks and uncertainties that it experiences during volatile market conditions such as what the Company experienced during fiscal 2008 and to date in fiscal 2009. These volatilities can have a severe impact on operations. The Companys revenues are derived from the sale and distribution of ethanol and distillers grains to customers primarily located in the United States. Corn for the production process is supplied to the plant primarily from local agricultural producers through the Companys grain procurement agent. For the three month period ended April 30, 2009, ethanol sales averaged 68% of total revenues and corn costs averaged 66% of cost of goods sold.
The Companys operating and financial performance is largely driven by the prices at which it sells ethanol and the net expense of corn. The price of ethanol is influenced by factors such as supply and demand, the weather, government policies and programs, unleaded gasoline prices and the petroleum markets as a whole. Excess ethanol supply in the market, in particular, puts downward pressure on the price of ethanol. The Companys largest cost of production is corn. The cost of corn is generally impacted by factors such as supply and demand, the weather, government policies and programs, and our risk management program used to protect against the price volatility of these commodities. The Company anticipates that results from operations for the 2009 fiscal year will continue to be affected by relatively high corn prices, a surplus of ethanol, and possibly low ethanol prices. If the price of ethanol remains low for an extended period of time, the Company anticipates this could significantly affect our liquidity and gross margins may continue to stay negative, especially if raw material costs continue to increase.
3. INVENTORY
Inventory consists of the following:
|
|
April 30, 2009 |
|
October 31, 2008 |
|
||
Raw materials |
|
$ |
1,489,628 |
|
$ |
1,805,713 |
|
Spare parts |
|
451,592 |
|
484,032 |
|
||
Work in process |
|
545,332 |
|
573,416 |
|
||
Finished goods |
|
1,247,934 |
|
1,012,163 |
|
||
Totals |
|
$ |
3,734,486 |
|
$ |
3,875,324 |
|
4. DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS
As of April 30, 2009, the Company has entered into corn, natural gas, and denaturant derivative instruments, which are required to be recorded as either assets or liabilities at fair value in the balance sheet. Derivatives qualify for treatment as hedges when there is a high correlation between the change in fair value of the derivative instrument and the related change in value of the underlying hedged item and when the Company formally documents, designates, and assesses the effectiveness of transactions that receive hedge accounting initially and on an on-going basis. The Company must designate the hedging instruments based upon the exposure being hedged as a fair value hedge or a cash flow hedge. While the Company does not typically designate the derivative instruments that it enters into as hedging instruments because of the administrative costs associated with the related accounting, the Company believes that the derivative instruments represent an economic hedge. The Company does not enter into derivative transactions for trading purposes.
In order to reduce the risk caused by market fluctuations, the Company occasionally hedges its anticipated corn, natural gas, and denaturant purchases and ethanol sales by entering into options and futures contracts. These contracts are used with the intention to fix the purchase price of anticipated requirements of corn, natural gas, and
9
GRANITE FALLS ENERGY, LLC
Notes to Unaudited Condensed Financial Statements
April 30, 2009
denaturant in the Companys ethanol production activities and the related sales price of ethanol. The fair value of these contracts is based on quoted prices in active exchange-traded or over-the-counter markets. Although the Company believes its commodity derivative positions are economic hedges, none have been formally designated as a hedge for accounting purposes and derivative positions are recorded on the balance sheet at their fair market value, with changes in fair value recognized in current period earnings or losses. Gains and losses from ethanol related derivative instruments, including unrealized changes in the fair value of these positions, are included in the results of operations and are classified as a component of revenue. Gains and losses from corn, natural gas, and denaturant derivative instruments, including unrealized changes in the fair value of these positions, are included in the results of operations and are classified as a component of costs of goods sold. The Company does not enter into financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes. The Company records withdrawals and payments against the trade equity of derivative instruments as a reduction or increase in the value of the derivative instruments
As of April 30, 2009, the total notional amount of the Companys outstanding corn derivative instruments was approximately 950,000 bushels that were entered into to hedge forecasted corn purchases through July 2009. As of April 30, 2009, the total notional amount of the Companys outstanding natural gas derivative instruments was approximately 160,000 million British thermal units (MMBTU) that were entered into to hedge forecasted natural gas purchases through March 2010. At of April 30, 2009, the total notional amount of the Companys outstanding denaturant derivative instruments was approximately 630,000 gallons that were entered into to hedge forecasted denaturant purchases through January 2010. There may be offsetting positions that are not shown on a net basis that could lower the notional amount of positions outstanding as disclosed above.
The following tables provide details regarding the Companys derivative instruments at April 30, 2009, none of which are designated as hedging instruments under SFAS 133:
|
|
Balance Sheet location |
|
Assets |
|
Liabilities |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Corn contracts |
|
Derivative instruments |
|
$ |
3,262 |
|
$ |
|
|
Natural gas contracts |
|
Derivative instruments |
|
|
|
99,970 |
|
||
Denaturant contracts |
|
Derivative instruments |
|
11,661 |
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Totals |
|
|
|
$ |
14,923 |
|
$ |
99,970 |
|
In addition, as of April 30, 2009 the Company maintains $418,487 of restricted cash related to margin requirements for the Companys derivative instrument positions.
The following tables provide details regarding the gains and (losses) from Companys derivative instruments in statements of operations, none of which are designated as hedging instruments under SFAS 133:
|
|
Statement of |
|
Three-Months Ended April 30, |
|
||||
|
|
Operations location |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Ethanol contracts |
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
(3,884,446 |
) |
Corn contracts |
|
Cost of Goods Sold |
|
(3,921 |
) |
4,853,264 |
|
||
Natural gas contracts |
|
Cost of Goods Sold |
|
(164,727 |
) |
|
|
||
Denaturant contracts |
|
Cost of Goods Sold |
|
20,847 |
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Total gain (loss) |
|
|
|
$ |
(147,801 |
) |
$ |
968,818 |
|
10
GRANITE FALLS ENERGY, LLC
Notes to Unaudited Condensed Financial Statements
April 30, 2009
|
|
Statement of |
|
Six-Months Ended April 30, |
|
||||
|
|
Operations location |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Ethanol contracts |
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
119,248 |
|
$ |
(7,307,659 |
) |
Corn contracts |
|
Cost of Goods Sold |
|
(108,463 |
) |
8,993,684 |
|
||
Natural gas contracts |
|
Cost of Goods Sold |
|
(160,083 |
) |
|
|
||
Denaturant contracts |
|
Cost of Goods Sold |
|
20,847 |
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Total gain (loss) |
|
|
|
$ |
(128,451 |
) |
$ |
1,686,025 |
|
5. REVOLVING LINE OF CREDIT
The Company has a Loan Agreement with Minnwest Bank M.V. of Marshall, MN (the Bank). Under the Loan Agreement, the Company has a revolving line of credit with a maximum of $10,000,000 available and is secured by substantially all of the Companys assets. The interest rate on the revolving line of credit is 0.75 percentage points under the prime rate as reported by the Wall Street Journal, with a minimum rate of 6.0%. The interest rate on the revolving line of credit at April 30, 2009 was 6.0%, the minimum rate under the terms of the agreement. At April 30, 2009, the Company had an outstanding balance on this line of credit of $2,090,000. The Company is required to maintain a $1,000,000 savings account balance with the Bank to serve as collateral on this line of credit. This amount is included in restricted cash as of April 30, 2009 and October 31, 2008.
During first quarter of fiscal year 2008, the Company transferred letters of credit totaling $610,750 from FNBO to Minnwest Bank. These letters of credit were renewed for the same amount with Minnwest Bank on December 18, 2008. On February 13, 2009, the outstanding balance of the letters of credit was reduced to $462,853 due to the reduction in the credit requirement by Northern Natural Gas.
6. LONG-TERM DEBT
Long-term debt consists of the following:
|
|
April 30, 2009 |
|
October 31, 2008 |
|
||
Economic Development Authority (EDA) Loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
City of Granite Fall / MIF |
|
$ |
322,993 |
|
$ |
352,880 |
|
Western Minnesota RLF |
|
75,641 |
|
79,756 |
|
||
Chippewa County |
|
83,495 |
|
86,232 |
|
||
Total EDA Loan |
|
482,129 |
|
518,868 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Less: Current Maturities |
|
(74,362 |
) |
(73,771 |
) |
||
Total Long-Term Debt |
|
$ |
407,767 |
|
$ |
445,097 |
|
The estimated maturities of long term debt at April 30, 2009 are as follows:
2009 |
|
$ |
74,362 |
|
2010 |
|
75,568 |
|
|
2011 |
|
76,807 |
|
|
2012 |
|
78,081 |
|
|
2013 |
|
79,390 |
|
|
Thereafter |
|
97,921 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
482,129 |
|
11
GRANITE FALLS ENERGY, LLC
Notes to Unaudited Condensed Financial Statements
April 30, 2009
EDA Loans:
On February 1, 2006, the Company signed a Loan Agreement with the City of Granite Falls, MN (EDA Loan Agreement) for amounts to be borrowed from several state and regional economic development authorities. The original amounts are as follows:
City of Granite Falls / Minnesota Investment Fund (MIF): |
|
|
|
Original Amount: |
|
$500,000 |
|
Interest Rate: |
|
1.00% |
|
Principal and Interest Payments: |
|
Quarterly |
|
Maturity Date: |
|
June 15, 2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
Western Minnesota Revolving Loan Fund (RLF): |
|
|
|
Original Amount: |
|
$100,000 |
|
Interest Rate: |
|
5.00% |
|
Principal and Interest Payments: |
|
Semi-Annual |
|
Maturity Date: |
|
June 15, 2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
Chippewa County: |
|
|
|
Original Amount: |
|
$100,000 |
|
Interest Rate: |
|
3.00% |
|
Principal and Interest Payments: |
|
Semi-Annual |
|
Maturity Date: |
|
June 15, 2021 |
|
Amounts borrowed under the EDA Loan Agreements are secured by a second mortgage on all of the assets of the Company.
7. LEASES
On October 3, 2005, the Company signed a lease agreement with Trinity Industries Leasing Company (Trinity) for 75 hopper cars to assist us with the transport of distillers grains by rail. The lease is for a five-year period once the cars have been delivered and inspected in Granite Falls, MN. Based on final manufacturing and interest costs, the Company will pay Trinity $673 per month plus $0.03 per mile traveled in excess of 36,000 miles per year. Rent expense for these leases was $150,231 and $149,000 for the three months ended April 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Rent expense for these leases was $301,561 and $297,000 for the six month periods ended April 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
In February 2009, the Company assumed three rail car leases for the transportation of the Companys ethanol. The rail car lease payments are due monthly in the aggregate amount of approximately $89,000.
At April 30, the Company had the following minimum commitments, which at inception had non-cancelable terms of more than one year:
Periods Ending October 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
$ |
533,432 |
|
2010 |
|
1,059,564 |
|
|
2011 |
|
1,054,974 |
|
|
2012 |
|
1,015,644 |
|
|
2013 |
|
771,114 |
|
|
Thereafter |
|
1,070,318 |
|
|
Total minimum lease commitments |
|
$ |
5,505,046 |
|
12
GRANITE FALLS ENERGY, LLC
Notes to Unaudited Condensed Financial Statements
April 30, 2009
8. MEMBERS EQUITY
The Company has one class of membership units. The units have no par value and have identical rights, obligations and privileges. Income and losses are allocated to all members based upon their respective percentage of units held. In January 2009, the Company repurchased 500 units at the original offering price of $1,000 per unit from its former ethanol marketer. As of April 30, 2009 and October 31, 2008, the Company had 30,656 and 31,156 membership units issued and outstanding, respectively.
9. FAIR VALUE
Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (SFAS 157) defines fair value, outlines a framework for measuring fair value (although it does not expand the required use of fair value) and details the required disclosures about fair value measurements. Effective November 1, 2008, the Company adopted SFAS 157 except for certain nonfinancial assets and liabilities with respect to the deferral under FSP 157-2. The adoption of SFAS 157 did not have a material effect on the Companys financial position as of April 30, 2009, or the results of operations, or cash flows for the three and six month periods then ended. SFAS 157s requirements for certain nonfinancial assets and liabilities recognized or disclosed at fair value on a nonrecurring basis are deferred until fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008 in accordance with FASB Staff Position 157-2, Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157 (FSP 157-2). At the present time, the Company does not have any nonfinancial assets or liabilities that would require fair value recognition or disclosures under SFAS 157.
Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date in the principal or most advantageous market. The Company uses a fair value hierarchy that has three levels of inputs, both observable and unobservable, with use of the lowest possible level of input to determine fair value. Level 1 inputs include quoted market prices in an active market or the price of an identical asset or liability. Level 2 inputs are market data, other than Level 1, that are observable either directly or indirectly. Level 2 inputs include quoted market prices for similar assets or liabilities, quoted market prices in an inactive market, and other observable information that can be corroborated by market data. Level 3 inputs are unobservable and corroborated by little or no market data. The Company uses valuation techniques in a consistent manner from year-to-year.
The following table provides information on those assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis:
|
|
April 30, 2009 |
|
||||||||
|
|
Fair Value Carrying |
|
Fair Value Measurement Using |
|
||||||
|
|
Balance Sheet |
|
Level 1 |
|
Level 2 |
|
Level 3 |
|
||
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Derivative instruments |
|
$ |
14,923 |
|
$ |
14,923 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets at fair value |
|
$ |
14,923 |
|
$ |
14,923 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Derivative instruments |
|
$ |
99,970 |
|
$ |
99,970 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities at fair value |
|
$ |
99,970 |
|
$ |
99,970 |
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative instruments approximate their fair value based on quoted prices in active exchange-traded or over-the-counter markets.
13
GRANITE FALLS ENERGY, LLC
Notes to Unaudited Condensed Financial Statements
April 30, 2009
10. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Corn Storage and Grain Handling Agreement and Purchase Commitments
The Company has a corn storage and grain handling agreement with Farmers Cooperative Elevator (FCE), a member. Under this agreement, the Company agrees to purchase all of the corn needed for the operation of the plant from FCE. The price of the corn purchased will be the bid price FCE establishes for the plant plus a fee of $0.05 per bushel. The Company did not have any forward contracts in place with FCE for corn purchases at April 30, 2009.
Operating and Management Agreement
On August 1, 2008, the Company and Glacial Lakes Energy, LLC (GLE), a member, executed a settlement agreement and mutual release related to the dispute with GLE over the termination of the Operating and Management Agreement. The Company has agreed to pay GLE a contingent amount of 2% of net income of the Company, as defined per the agreement, for each of the fiscal years ending October 31, 2008 and 2009 and 1.5% of net income of the Company, as defined per the agreement, for the fiscal year ending October 31, 2010. As of April 30, 2009, the Company has not accrued for any contingent amounts due on this agreement.
14
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
We prepared the following discussion and analysis to help you better understand our financial condition, changes in our financial condition, and results of operations for the three and six month periods ended April 30, 2009, compared to the same period of the prior fiscal year. This discussion should be read in conjunction with the condensed financial statements and notes and the information contained in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2008.
Disclosure Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
This report contains historical information, as well as forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements include any statements that involve known and unknown risks and relate to future events and our expectations regarding future performance or conditions. Words such as may, will, should, expect, plan, anticipate, believe, estimate, future, intend, could, hope, predict, target, potential, or continue or the negative of these terms or other similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements, but are not the exclusive means of identifying such statements. These forward-looking statements, and others we make from time to time, are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties. Many factors could cause actual results to differ materially from those projected in forward-looking statements. While it is impossible to identify all such factors, factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those estimated by us include, but are not limited to:
· Changes in the availability and price of corn and natural gas;
· Changes in our business strategy, capital improvements or development plans;
· Results of our hedging transactions and other risk management strategies;
· Decreases in the market prices of ethanol and distillers grains;
· Ethanol supply exceeding demand; and corresponding ethanol price reductions;
· Changes in the environmental regulations that apply to our plant operations;
· Changs in the availability of credit and our ability to generate sufficient liquidity to fund our operations, debt service requirements and capital expenditures;
· Changes in plant production capacity or technical difficulties in operating the plant;
· Changes in general economic conditions or the occurrence of certain events causing an economic impact in the agriculture, oil or automobile industries;
· Lack of transport, storage and blending infrastructure preventing ethanol from reaching high demand markets;
· Changes in federal and/or state laws (including the elimination of any federal and/or state ethanol tax incentives);
· Changes and advances in ethanol production technology;
· Effects of mergers, consolidations or contractions in the ethanol industry;
· Competition from alternative fuel additives;
· The development of infrastructure related to the sale and distribution of ethanol;
· Our inelastic demand for corn, as it is the only available feedstock for our plant;
· Our ability to retain key employees and maintain labor relations; and
· Volatile commodity and financial markets.
The cautionary statements referred to in this section also should be considered in connection with any subsequent written or oral forward-looking statements that may be issued by us or persons acting on our behalf. We do not undertake any duty to update forward-looking statements after the date they are made or to conform forward-looking statements to actual results or to changes in circumstances or expectations. Furthermore, we cannot guarantee future results, events, levels of activity, performance, or achievements. We caution you not to put undue reliance on any forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this report. You should read this report and the documents that we reference in this report and have filed as exhibits, completely and with the understanding that our actual future results may be materially different from what we currently expect. We qualify all of our forward-looking statements by these cautionary statements.
15
Overview
Granite Falls Energy, LLC (Granite Falls or the Company) is a Minnesota limited liability company currently producing fuel-grade ethanol, distillers grains, and crude corn oil for sale. Our plant has an approximate annual production capacity of 50 million gallons, and our environmental permits allow us to produce ethanol at a rate of 49.9 million gallons of undenatured ethanol on a twelve month rolling sum basis.
Our operating results are largely driven by the prices at which we sell our ethanol, distillers grains, and crude corn oil as well as the other costs related to production. The price of ethanol has historically fluctuated with the price of petroleum-based products such as unleaded gasoline, heating oil and crude oil. The price of distillers grains has historically been influenced by the price of corn as a substitute livestock feed. We expect these price relationships to continue for the foreseeable future, although recent volatility in the commodities markets makes historical price relationships less reliable. Our largest costs of production are corn, natural gas, depreciation and manufacturing chemicals. The cost of corn is largely impacted by geopolitical supply and demand factors and the outcome of our risk management strategies. Prices for natural gas, manufacturing chemicals and denaturant are tied directly to the overall energy sector, crude oil and unleaded gasoline.
As of the date of this report, we have 35 full time employees. Ten of these employees are involved primarily in management and administration. The remaining employees are involved primarily in plant operations. We do not currently anticipate any significant change in the number of employees at our plant.
Results of Operations for the Three Months Ended April 30, 2009 and 2008
The following table shows the results of our operations and the approximate percentage of revenues, costs of goods sold, operating expenses and other items to total revenues in our unaudited statements of operations for the three months ended April 30, 2009 and 2008:
|
|
Three
Months |
|
Three
Months |
|
||||||
Statement of Operations Data |
|
Amount |
|
Percent |
|
Amount |
|
Percent |
|
||
Revenues |
|
$ |
21,529,863 |
|
100.0 |
% |
$ |
19,018,497 |
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Cost of Goods Sold |
|
22,089,595 |
|
102.6 |
% |
19,027,679 |
|
100.0 |
% |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Gross Loss |
|
(559,732 |
) |
(2.6 |
)% |
(9,182 |
) |
(0.1 |
)% |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Operating Expenses |
|
518,509 |
|
2.4 |
% |
556,866 |
|
2.9 |
% |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Operating Loss |
|
(1,078,241 |
) |
(5.0 |
)% |
(576,048 |
) |
(3.0 |
)% |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Other Income, net |
|
6,998 |
|
|
% |
23,162 |
|
0.1 |
% |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net Loss |
|
$ |
(1,071,243 |
) |
(5.0 |
)% |
$ |
(552,886 |
) |
(2.9 |
)% |
Revenues
Our revenues from operations come from two primary sources: sales of fuel ethanol and sales of distillers grains. However, during the quarter ended April 30, 2009, we also had revenue from the sale of corn oil.
The following table shows the sources of our revenue for the three months ended April 30, 2009.
16
|
|
Amount |
|
Percentage of |
|
|
Revenue Sources |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ethanol Sales |
|
$ |
17,473,968 |
|
81.1 |
% |
Distillers Grains Sales |
|
3,812,328 |
|
17.7 |
|
|
Corn Oil Sales |
|
243,567 |
|
1.2 |
|
|
Ethanol Derivative Activity Gains (Losses) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Revenues |
|
$ |
21,529,863 |
|
100.0 |
% |
The following table shows the sources of our revenue for the three months ended April 30, 2008:
|
|
Amount |
|
Percentage of |
|
|
Revenue Sources |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ethanol Sales |
|
$ |
19,836,318 |
|
104.3 |
% |
Distillers Grains Sales |
|
3,066,625 |
|
16.1 |
|
|
Corn Oil Sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ethanol Derivative Activity Gains (Losses) |
|
(3,884,446 |
) |
(20.4 |
) |
|
Total Revenues |
|
$ |
19,018,497 |
|
100.0 |
% |
The following table shows additional data regarding production and price levels for our primary inputs and products for the three months ended April 30, 2009 and 2008:
|
|
Three
Months |
|
Three
Months |
|
||
Additional Data |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Ethanol sold (gallons) |
|
12,082,537 |
|
9,891,100 |
|
||
Dried distillers grains sold (tons) |
|
29,934 |
|
25,987 |
|
||
Modified distillers grains sold (tons) |
|
4,767 |
|
414 |
|
||
Corn oil sold (pounds) |
|
1,436,920 |
|
|
|
||
Ethanol average price per gallon (net of hedging activity) |
|
$ |
1.45 |
|
$ |
1.61 |
|
Dried distillers grains average price per ton |
|
$ |
117.14 |
|
$ |
117.57 |
|
Modified distillers grains average price per ton |
|
$ |
64.15 |
|
$ |
27.65 |
|
Corn oil average price per pound |
|
$ |
0.17 |
|
|
|
|
Corn costs per bushel (net of hedging activity) |
|
$ |
3.48 |
|
$ |
3.82 |
|
Revenues.
In the three month period ended April 30, 2009, ethanol sales comprised approximately 81% of our revenues and distillers grains sales comprised approximately 18% percent of our revenues, while corn oil sales comprised approximately 1% of our revenues. For the three month period ended April 30, 2008, ethanol sales comprised approximately 87% of our revenue, and distillers grains sales comprised approximately 13% of our revenue, without including ethanol derivatives. We did not have any revenue from the sale of corn oil for the three month period ended April 30, 2008.
Management believes that distillers grains represent a larger proportion of our revenues during the three months ended April 30, 2009 compared to the same period of 2008 as a result of lower ethanol prices and higher distillers grains prices we received during our second fiscal quarter of 2009 compared to the same period of 2008. A second factor driving our revenues for our second fiscal quarter of 2009 compared to the same period of 2008 is our increased production of ethanol, distillers grains and corn oil. In November, 2008 we increased our production of ethanol and our co-products from a 45 million gallon per year rate to a 50 million gallon per year rate.
The average ethanol sales price we received for the three month period ended April 30, 2009 was approximately 10% lower than our average ethanol sales price for the comparable 2008 period. Management attributes this decrease
17
in ethanol prices, and the decrease in commodity prices generally, to the worldwide economic slowdown. However, management anticipates that the price of ethanol may increase during the second half of our 2009 fiscal year as a result of an increased fuel demand as we move into the summer driving season, which seems to be positively affecting the market prices of crude oil and gasoline.
Management also anticipates that our results of operations for our 2009 fiscal year will continue to be affected by high corn prices, a surplus of ethanol, and volatility in the commodity markets. As a result of these factors, management anticipates that the ethanol plant may not operate profitably in 2009. If the price of ethanol remains low for an extended period of time, management anticipates that this could significantly impact our liquidity, especially if our raw material costs continue to increase. Management believes the industry will need to continue to grow demand and further develop an ethanol distribution system to facilitate additional blending of ethanol and gasoline to offset the increased supply brought to the marketplace by additional production. We expect ethanol demand to continue to grow and ethanol distribution to continue to expand as a result of the positive blend economics that currently exist once the Volumetric Ethanol Excise Tax Credit is accounted for by the gasoline refiners and blenders.
The price we received for our dried distillers grains was steady during the three month period ended April 30, 2009 compared to the same period of 2008. Prior to November 2008 we were not producing modified distillers grains on a regular basis and any modified distillers grains we sold were off specification product and were sold at a discount. However, after November 2008 we began producing and selling modified distillers grains and the price we received for our modified distillers grains increased by approximately 232% during the three month period ended April 30, 2009 compared to the same period of 2008. We anticipate that the market price of distillers grains will continue to be volatile as a result of changes in the price of corn and competing animal feed substitutes such as soybean meal as well as volatility in distillers grains supplies related to changes in ethanol production.
We independently market our corn oil which is used primarily as a biodiesel feedstock and as a supplement for animal feed. Corn oil sales accounted for approximately 1% of our revenues during our quarter ended April 30, 2009.
We occasionally engage in hedging activities with respect to our ethanol sales. We recognize the gains or losses that result from the changes in the value of these derivative instruments in revenues as the changes occur. As ethanol prices fluctuate, the value of our derivative instruments are impacted, which affects our financial performance. We anticipate continued volatility in our revenues due to the timing of the changes in value of the derivative instruments relative to the price and volume of the ethanol being hedged.
Cost of Sales
Our costs of goods sold as a percentage of revenues were approximately 103% for the three month period ended April 30, 2009 compared to approximately 100% for the same period of 2008. Our two largest costs of production are corn (66% of cost of goods sold for our three months ended April 30, 2009) and natural gas (14% of cost of goods sold for our three months ended April 30, 2009). Our cost of goods sold increased by approximately $3,000,000 in the three months ended April 30, 2009, compared to the three months ended April 30, 2008, even though our revenue only increased by approximately $2,500,000. This increase in the cost of goods sold is primarily a result of increased corn and natural gas consumption, which resulted in the production of approximately 2,200,000 additional gallons of ethanol. Our per bushel corn costs decreased by approximately 10% for the three months ended April 30, 2009 as compared to the same period for our 2008 fiscal year. However, due to our increased corn consumption and corresponding ethanol production our aggregate cost of goods sold also increased. Our increased cost of goods sold combined with declining ethanol revenues placed pressure on our operating margins.
We anticipate that corn prices will continue to be volatile throughout the first half of the growing season. Wet weather in the eastern corn belt has caused planting delays, which have caused recent increases in the price of corn. However, we anticipate that corn prices may decrease somewhat following planting time. We expect that the poor conditions associated with the global economic slowdown will ultimately reduce demand for corn. We anticipate that this may reduce corn prices during the end of the current marketing year. We performed a lower of cost or market analysis on inventory as of April 30, 2009 and determined that the market values of certain inventories were not less than their carrying value.
18
For the three month period ended April 30, 2009, we experienced an increase of approximately 15% in natural gas prices compared to the same period of 2008. We attribute this significant increase in natural gas prices to the forward purchase contracts we entered last summer and fall to hedge our winter natural gas usage. The market price for natural gas over the winter months was less than our forward contract prices and our natural gas expense was higher than it would have been had we decided not to hedge our winter natural gas supplies. We expect the market price for natural gas to remain low in the near term as we continue to endure the worldwide economic slowdown and the resulting decreased energy demand. Our natural gas consumption increased by approximately 17% for the three month period ended April 30, 2009 compared to the same period of 2008. We attribute this increase in natural gas consumption with increased ethanol production during the three month period ended April 30, 2009 compared to the same period of 2008.
We occasionally engage in hedging activities with respect to corn, natural gas or denaturant. We recognize the gains or losses that result from the changes in the value of our derivative instruments in cost of goods sold as the changes occur. As corn, natural gas and denaturant prices fluctuate, the value of our derivative instruments are impacted, which affects our financial performance. We anticipate continued volatility in our cost of goods sold due to the timing of the changes in value of the derivative instruments relative to the cost and use of the commodity being hedged.
Operating Expense
Our operating expenses as a percentage of revenues were lower for the three month period ended April 30, 2009 than they were for the same period ended April 30, 2008. These percentages were 2.4% and 2.9% for the three months ended April 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. This decrease in operating expenses is primarily due to increased operating efficiencies and a concerted effort by management and staff to lower our operating expenses. We expect that going forward our operating expenses will remain relatively steady.
Operating Income (Loss)
Our loss from operations for the three months ended April 30, 2009 was approximately 5.0% of our revenues compared to a loss of approximately 3.0% of our revenues for the three months ended April 30, 2008. For the three months ended April 30, 2009, we reported an operating loss of approximately $1,100,000 and for the three months ended April 30, 2008, we had an operating loss of approximately $600,000. This significant decrease in our operating income is primarily due to lower per gallon revenue from our ethanol sales.
Interest Expense and Interest Income
Interest expense for the three months ended April 30, 2009, was approximately 0.13% of our revenue and totaled $27,000, compared to no interest expense for the three months ended April 30, 2008. This increase in interest expense is due primarily to an increase in the outstanding balance we have been carrying on our revolving line of credit at Minnwest Bank.
Results of Operations for the Six Months Ended April 30, 2009 and 2008
The following table shows the results of our operations and the approximate percentage of revenues, costs of sales, operating expenses and other items to total revenues in our unaudited statements of operations for the six months ended April 30, 2009 and 2008:
19
|
|
Six Months |
|
Six Months |
|
||||||
Statement of Operations Data |
|
Amount |
|
Percent |
|
Amount |
|
Percent |
|
||
Revenues |
|
$ |
42,312,605 |
|
100.0 |
% |
$ |
43,317,367 |
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Cost of Goods Sold |
|
43,161,411 |
|
102.0 |
% |
39,910,492 |
|
92.1 |
% |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Gross Profit (Loss) |
|
(848,806 |
) |
(2.0 |
)% |
3,406,875 |
|
7.9 |
% |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Operating Expenses |
|
1,039,484 |
|
2.5 |
% |
1,222,296 |
|
2.8 |
% |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Operating Income (Loss) |
|
(1,888,290 |
) |
(4.5 |
)% |
2,184,579 |
|
5.0 |
% |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Other Expense, net |
|
(689,439 |
) |
(1.6 |
)% |
(6,685 |
) |
|
% |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net Income (Loss) |
|
$ |
(2,577,729 |
) |
(6.0 |
)% |
$ |
2,177,894 |
|
5.0 |
% |
Revenues
Our revenues from operations come from two primary sources: sales of fuel ethanol and sales of distillers grains. However, during the six months ended April 30, 2009, we also had revenue from the sale of corn oil.
The following table shows the sources of our revenue for the six months ended April 30, 2009.
|
|
Amount |
|
Percentage of |
|
|
Revenue Sources |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ethanol Sales |
|
$ |
34,238,833 |
|
81.0 |
% |
Distillers Grains Sales |
|
7,492,845 |
|
17.7 |
|
|
Corn Oil Sales |
|
461,678 |
|
1.0 |
|
|
Ethanol Derivative Activity Gains/ (Losses) |
|
119,249 |
|
0.3 |
|
|
Total Revenues |
|
$ |
43,312,605 |
|
100.0 |
% |
The following table shows the sources of our revenue for the six months ended April 30, 2008:
|
|
Amount |
|
Percentage of |
|
|
Revenue Sources |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ethanol Sales |
|
$ |
43,866,258 |
|
101.3 |
% |
Distillers Grains Sales |
|
6,758,767 |
|
15.6 |
|
|
Corn Oil Sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ethanol Derivative Activity Gains/ (Losses) |
|
(7,307,658 |
) |
(16.9 |
) |
|
Total Revenues |
|
$ |
43,317,367 |
|
100.0 |
% |
The following table shows additional data regarding production and price levels for our primary inputs and products for the six months ended April 30, 2009 and 2008:
20
|
|
Six Months |
|
Six Months |
|
||
Additional Data |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Ethanol sold (gallons) |
|
23,880,583 |
|
22,848,677 |
|
||
Dried distillers grains sold (tons) |
|
61,498 |
|
62,892 |
|
||
Modified distillers grains sold (tons) |
|
8,747 |
|
900 |
|
||
Corn oil sold (pounds) |
|
2,882,360 |
|
|
|
||
Ethanol average price per gallon (net of hedging activity) |
|
$ |
1.44 |
|
$ |
1.60 |
|
Dried distillers grains average price per ton |
|
$ |
112.68 |
|
$ |
107.08 |
|
Modified distillers grains average price per ton |
|
$ |
64.39 |
|
$ |
27.23 |
|
Corn oil average price per pound |
|
$ |
0.16 |
|
|
|
|
Corn costs per bushel (net of hedging activity) |
|
$ |
3.38 |
|
$ |
3.40 |
|
Revenues
In the six month period ended April 30, 2009, ethanol sales comprised approximately 81.0% of our revenues and distillers grains sales comprised approximately 18.0% percent of our revenues, while corn oil sales comprised approximately 1.0% of our revenues. For the six month period ended April 30, 2008, ethanol sales comprised approximately 84.0% of our revenue, without accounting for ethanol hedging, and distillers grains sales comprised approximately 16.0% of our revenue. We did not have any revenue from the sale of corn oil for the six month period ended April 30, 2008.
Management believes that distillers grains represent a larger proportion of our revenues during the six months ended April 30, 2009 compared to the same period of 2008 as a result of lower ethanol prices and higher distillers grains prices we received during our first half of fiscal year 2009 compared to the same period of 2008. Our revenues were lower for our first half of fiscal year 2009 compared to the same period of 2008 primarily as a result of lower ethanol prices, despite our increase in ethanol production.
The average ethanol sales price we received for the six month period ended April 30, 2009 was approximately 10.0% lower than our average ethanol sales price for the comparable 2008 period. Management attributes this decrease in ethanol prices with the decrease in commodity prices generally as a result of the worldwide economic slowdown. However, management anticipates the price of ethanol may increase during the second half of our 2009 fiscal year as a result of an increase in fuel demand as we move into the summer driving season which seems to be positively affecting the market prices of crude oil and gasoline.
The price we received for our dried distillers grains increased by approximately 5.0% during the six month period ended April 30, 2009 compared to the same period of 2008. Prior to November 2008 we were not producing modified distillers grains on a regular basis and any modified distillers grains we sold were off specification product and were sold at a discount. However, after November 2008 we began producing and selling modified distillers grains and the price we received for our modified distillers grains increased by approximately 236% during the six month period ended April 30, 2009 compared to the same period of 2008. Management attributes this increase in the price of our dried distillers grains to an increase in product quality and a larger volume of local sales. We anticipate that the market price of distillers grains will continue to be volatile as a result of changes in the price of corn and competing animal feed substitutes such as soybean meal as well as volatility in distillers grains supplies related to changes in ethanol production.
Cost of Sales
Our costs of goods sold as a percentage of revenues were approximately 102.0% for the six month period ended April 30, 2009 compared to 92.0% for the same period of 2008. Our two largest costs of production are corn (66.0% of cost of goods sold for our six months ended April 30, 2009) and natural gas (14.0% of cost of goods sold for our three months ended April 30, 2009). Our cost of goods sold increased by approximately $3,250,000 in the six months ended April 30, 2009, compared to the six months ended April 30, 2008, while our revenue for the same period decreased by approximately $1,000,000. This increase in the cost of goods sold is primarily a result of steady corn prices combined with an increase in the volume of corn processed at our facility.
21
Operating Expense
Our operating expenses as a percentage of revenues were slightly lower for the six month period ended April 30, 2009 than they were for the same period ended April 30, 2008. These percentages were 2.5% and 2.8% for the six months ended April 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. This decrease in operating expenses is primarily due to increased operating efficiences and a concerted effort by our management and staff to lower our operating expenses. We expect that going forward our operating expenses will remain relatively steady.
Operating Income (Loss)
Our loss from operations for the six months ended April 30, 2009 was approximately 4.5% of our revenues compared to income of approximately 5.0% of our revenues for the six months ended April 30, 2008. This decrease in our profitability is primarily due to a decrease in the price of ethanol and the corresponding decline in our operating margins.
Other Income and Other Expense
Other expense for the six months ended April 30, 2009, was approximately 1.6% of our revenue and totaled approximately $700,000. Other expense for the six months ended April 30, 2008 was insignificant relative to our revenue and totaled approximately $7,000. This increase in other expense is due primarily to the termination fee of approximately $780,000 that we incurred in connection with the termination of our ethanol marketing agreement with Aventine Renewable Energy, Inc. during our fiscal quarter ended January 31, 2009, which was offset by consulting income of approximately $120,000.
Interest Expense
Interest expense for the six months ended April 30, 2009, was approximately $64,000. Interest expense for the six months ended April 30, 2008 was approximately $75,000. This reduction in interest expense is due primarily to a reduction in our outstanding debt.
Changes in Financial Condition for the Six Months Ended April 30, 2009
The following table highlights the changes in our financial condition for the six months ended April 30, 2009 from our previous fiscal year ended October 31, 2008:
|
|
April 30, 2009 |
|
October 31, 2008 |
|
||
Current Assets |
|
$ |
8,290,707 |
|
$ |
9,382,784 |
|
Current Liabilities |
|
$ |
5,155,930 |
|
$ |
6,108,632 |
|
Long-Term Debt |
|
$ |
407,767 |
|
$ |
445,097 |
|
Members Equity |
|
$ |
48,435,061 |
|
$ |
51,512,790 |
|
Total assets were approximately $54,000,000 at April 30, 2009 compared to approximately $58,000,000 at October 31, 2008. This decrease in total assets is primarily a result of a charge of approximately $3,200,000 for depreciation expense, which reduces the carrying value of our property, plant and equipment on our balance sheet.
Current assets totaled approximately $8,000,000 at April 30, 2009, a slight decrease from approximately $9,000,000 at October 31, 2008. The change resulted primarily from a decrease in our accounts receivable and our outstanding derivative instruments.
Total current liabilities totaled approximately $5,000,000 at April 30, 2009 compared to approximately $6,000,000 at October 31, 2008. At October 31, 2008 we accrued a write down of approximately $1,300,000 on our forward corn contracts to net realizable value. At April 30, 2009 no such accrual was required so there was a decrease of approximately $1,300,000 in our accrued liabilities because no write down was required. Long-term debt decreased slightly from approximately $445,000 at October 31, 2008 to approximately $408,000 at April 30, 2009 as we
22
continue to pay down our EDA loans.
We did not make any distributions to our members during the first six months of our 2009 fiscal year. Further, as a result of the operating losses incurred so far this fiscal year we do not currently expect to make any distributions during our 2009 fiscal year.
Plant Operations
Management anticipates our plant will continue to operate at our currently permitted capacity of 49.9 million gallons per year. We expect to have sufficient cash generated by continuing operations, current lines of credit and cash reserves to cover our usual operating costs, which consist primarily of our corn supply, our natural gas supply, staffing expense, office expense, audit and legal compliance, working capital costs and debt service obligations.
Trends and Uncertainties Impacting the Ethanol and Distillers Grains Industries and Our Future Revenues
Our revenues primarily consist of sales of the ethanol and distillers grains we produce; however, we also realize revenue from the sale of corn oil we separate from our distillers syrup. The price we received for ethanol decreased during our fiscal quarter ended April 30, 2009 in conjunction with a decreases in the market price of gasoline during that period. Management anticipates stronger ethanol demand and higher ethanol prices during the summer months due to a seasonal increase in the demand for gasoline and ethanol. Management also anticipates that our results of operations for our 2009 fiscal year will continue to be affected by relatively high corn prices. If the price of ethanol remains low for an extended period of time, management anticipates that this could significantly impact our liquidity, especially if our raw material costs continue to increase. We anticipate that the price of distillers grains will continue to fluctuate in reaction to changes in the price of corn and soybean meal. The ethanol industry needs to continue to expand the market for distillers grains in order to maintain current distillers grains prices.
According to the Renewable Fuels Association (RFA), as of May 26, 2009, there were 196 ethanol plants nationwide with the capacity to produce approximately 12.6 billion gallons of ethanol annually. The RFA estimates that plants with an annual production capacity of approximately 10.9 billion gallons are currently operating and that approximately 14% of the nameplate production capacity is not currently operational. Others estimate that 20% or more of the nations ethanol production capacity is currently idle. An additional 21 plants are currently under construction or expansion, which may add an estimated 1.9 billion gallons of annual ethanol production capacity when they are completed. Accordingly, management believes the production capacity of the ethanol industry is greater than ethanol demand which may continue to depress ethanol prices. According to the Energy Information Administration, 2008 ethanol demand was 9.5 billion gallons which is significantly less than the current production capacity of the ethanol industry. Pursuant to the National Renewable Fuels Standard, renewable fuels must be blended into 11.1 billion gallons of fuel in 2009, however, corn based ethanol can only account for 10.5 billion gallons of the RFS. Therefore, management anticipates that ethanol demand will be capped at approximately 10.5 billion gallons for 2009. In previous years, more ethanol was blended than was required by the RFS as a result of the price of ethanol being less than the price of gasoline. However, during our quarter ended April 30, 2009, the difference in price between ethanol and gasoline did not present a strong incentive for gasoline blenders to utilize ethanol which has reduced ethanol demand. As ethanol prices and gasoline prices converge, the economic incentive for gasoline blenders to use ethanol increases, especially when the gasoline blenders account for the value of the Volumetric Ethanol Excise Tax Credit. Subsequent to our quarter ended April 30, 2009, gasoline prices have moved higher than ethanol prices and there seems to be more economic incentive for blenders to use more ethanol.
Currently, ethanol is primarily blended with conventional gasoline for use in standard (non-flex fuel) vehicles to create a blend which is 10% ethanol and 90% conventional gasoline. Estimates indicate that approximately 135 billion gallons of gasoline are sold in the United States each year. However, gasoline demand may be shrinking in the United States as a result of the global economic slowdown. Assuming that all gasoline in the United States is blended at a rate of 10% ethanol and 90% gasoline, the maximum demand for ethanol is 13.5 billion gallons. This is commonly referred to as the blending wall, which represents a limit where more ethanol cannot be blended into the national gasoline pool. This is a theoretical limit since it is believed it would not be possible to blend ethanol into every gallon of gasoline that is used in the United States and it discounts higher percentage blends of ethanol such as E85 used in flex fuel vehicles. Many believe that the ethanol industry will reach this blending wall in 2009 or 2010. In addition, the
23
RFS requires the use of 36 billion gallons of renewable fuels being used each year by 2022. The Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 also requires the increased use of advanced biofuels, which are alternative biofuels produced without using corn starch such as cellulosic ethanol and biomass-based diesel, with 21 billion gallons of the mandated 36 billion gallons of renewable fuel required to come from advanced biofuels by 2022. In order to meet the RFS and expand demand for ethanol, higher blends of ethanol must be utilized in conventional automobiles. Such higher blends of ethanol have recently become a contentious issue. Automobile manufacturers and environmental groups have fought against higher ethanol blends. Currently, state and federal regulations prohibit the use of higher ethanol blends in conventional automobiles and vehicle manufacturers have indicated that using higher blends of ethanol in conventional automobiles would void the manufacturers warranty. Without increases in the allowable percentage blends of ethanol, demand for ethanol may not continue to increase. The ethanol industry must continue to expand demand for ethanol in order to support the market price of ethanol. Our financial condition may be negatively affected by decreases in the selling price of ethanol resulting from decreased ethanol demand.
Trends and Uncertainties Impacting the Corn and Natural Gas Markets and Our Future Cost of Goods Sold
Our costs of our goods sold consist primarily of costs relating to the corn and natural gas supplies necessary to produce ethanol and distillers grains for sale. We grind approximately 1,450,000 bushels of corn each month. For the quarter ended April 30, 2009, our average cost of corn, net of hedging activity, was approximately $3.48 per bushel, which is approximately $0.34 lower than our cost of corn for the same period ended April 30, 2008. We attempt to use hedging strategies to minimize our exposure to corn price movements; however, there is no guarantee or assurance that our hedging strategies will be effective.
Natural gas is also an important input commodity to our manufacturing process. Our natural gas usage is approximately 115,000 million British thermal units (mmBTU) per month. We continue to work to find ways to limit our natural gas price risk through efficient usage practices, research of new technologies, and pricing and hedging strategies. We use a marketing firm and an energy consultant for our natural gas procurement and will work with them on an ongoing basis to mitigate our exposure to volatile gas prices.
Compliance with Environmental Laws
We are subject to extensive air, water and other environmental regulations and we have been required to obtain a number of environmental permits to construct and operate the plant. We submitted an air permit amendment to the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) in early January 2008 to correct inconsistencies in fermentation tank capacity and process throughput parameters. At that time we also requested authorization for the production of wet cake and a production increase of 4.9 million gallons per year of undenatured ethanol. In September 2008, we received the amended environmental permits which included all of items requested above.
Along with the requested production increase in the Air Permit, the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) water discharge permit required a permit modification to ensure continued compliance. The permit modification was also completed and received in September 2008. The MPCA requires the NPDES permit to be renewed every five years. Our expiration date is April 2009. A permit renewal package was submitted to the state in November 2008. The MPCA has not yet taken any action on our NPDES permit renewal application. We are allowed to continue operation under our current permit until the package has been renewed.
We are subject to oversight activities by the MPCA as well as the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). There is always a risk that the EPA may enforce certain rules and regulations differently than the MPCA. Minnesota or EPA rules are subject to change, and any such changes could result in greater regulatory burdens on plant operations. We could also be subject to environmental or nuisance claims from adjacent property owners or residents in the area arising from possible foul smells or other air or water discharges from the plant. Such claims may have adverse results in court if we are deemed to have engaged in a nuisance that substantially impairs the fair use and enjoyment of real estate. Our management considers environmental compliance a top priority and strives to consistently meet the environmental standards of the MPCA and the EPA.
The governments regulation of the environment changes constantly. It is possible that more stringent federal or state environmental rules or regulations could be adopted, which could increase our operating costs and expenses. It is
24
also possible that federal or state environmental rules or regulations could be adopted and have an adverse effect on the production or use of ethanol. For example, changes in the environmental regulations regarding the required oxygen content of automobile emissions could have an adverse effect on the ethanol industry. Furthermore, plant operations are governed by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). OSHA regulations may change such that the cost of operating the plant may increase.
Contracting Activity
Farmers Cooperative Elevator Company supplies our corn. Eco-Energy markets our ethanol, and CHS, Inc. markets our distillers grains by rail. Each of these contracts is critical to our success and we are very dependent on each of these companies. Accordingly, the financial stability of these partners is critical to the successful operation of our business. We are independently marketing a portion of our distillers grains to local markets; however, if local markets do not support competitive prices we may market all of our distillers grains through CHS, Inc. We independently market a small portion of our ethanol production as E-85 to local retailers and all of the corn oil we produce is presently sold on the spot market.
Ethanol Distribution
On December 24, 2008, we entered into an Ethanol Marketing Agreement (Eco Agreement) with EcoEnergy. Pursuant to the Eco Agreement, Eco-Energy agreed to purchase the entire ethanol output of our ethanol plant and to arrange for the transportation of ethanol; however, we are responsible for securing all of the rail cars necessary for the transportation of ethanol by rail. We pay Eco-Energy a certain percentage of the FOB plant price in consideration of Eco-Energy s services.
Commodity Price Risk Protection
We seek to minimize the risks from fluctuations in the prices of corn, ethanol and natural gas through the use of derivative instruments. In practice, as markets move, we actively manage our risk and adjust hedging strategies as appropriate. We do not use hedge accounting which would match the gain or loss on our hedge positions to the specific commodity contracts being hedged. Instead, we are using fair value accounting for our hedge positions, which means that as the current market price of our hedge positions changes, the gains and losses are immediately recognized in our cost of goods sold. The immediate recognition of hedging gains and losses under fair value accounting can cause net income to be volatile from quarter to quarter due to the timing of the change in value of the derivative instruments relative to the cost and use of the commodity being hedged.
As of April 30, 2009, the fair values of our derivative instruments are reflected as a liability in the amount of $85,047. As of October 31, 2008, we recorded an asset for our derivative instruments in the amount of $568,822. There are several variables that could affect the extent to which our derivative instruments are impacted by fluctuations in the price of corn, ethanol, denaturant or natural gas. However, it is likely that commodity cash prices will have the greatest impact on the derivative instruments with delivery dates nearest the current cash price. As we move forward, additional protection may be necessary. As the prices of these hedged commodities move in reaction to market trends and information, our statement of operations will be affected depending on the impact such market movements have on the value of our derivative instruments. Depending on market movements, crop prospects and weather, these price protection positions may cause immediate adverse effects, but are expected to produce long-term positive growth for Granite Falls.
As of April 30, 2009, we had entered into derivative instruments to hedge 500,000 bushels of our future corn purchases through July 2009 for the purpose of minimizing risk from future market price fluctuations. We have used various option contracts as vehicles for these hedges.
As of April 30, 2009, we had price protection in place for approximately 71% of our natural gas needs through March 2010. As we move forward, we may determine that additional price protection for natural gas purchases is necessary to reduce our susceptibility to price increases. However, we may not be able to secure natural gas for prices less than current market price and we may not recover high costs of production resulting from high natural gas prices, which may raise our costs of production and reduce our net income.
25
The derivative accounts are reported at fair value as designated by our broker. We have categorized the cash flows related to the hedging activities in the same category as the item being hedged. We expect substantially all of our hedge positions outstanding as of April 30, 2009 to be realized and recognized by March 2010.
Critical Accounting Estimates
Management uses estimates and assumptions in preparing our financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. These estimates and assumptions affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities, and the reported revenues and expenses.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
The following table shows cash flows for the six months ended April 30, 2009 and 2008:
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
$ |
1,092,747 |
|
$ |
7,679,947 |
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
$ |
(182,422 |
) |
$ |
(227,236 |
) |
Net cash used in financing activities |
|
$ |
(507,239 |
) |
$ |
(6,267,363 |
) |
Net increase (decrease) in cash |
|
$ |
403,086 |
|
$ |
(1,185,348 |
) |
Operating Cash Flows. Cash provided by operating activities was $1,092,747 for the six months ended April 30, 2009, which was a decrease from $7,679,947 provided by operating activities for the six months ended April 30, 2008. Contributing to this decrease in cash provided by our operating activities is our negative net income, the decrease in the fair value of our derivative instruments and our increase in accrued liabilities compared to the six months ended April 30, 2008. Currently, our capital needs are being adequately met through cash flows from our operating activities and our currently available credit facilities.
Investing Cash Flows. Cash used in investing activities was ($182,422) for the six months ended April 30, 2009, compared to $227,236 for the six months ended April 30, 2008. During the six months ended April 30, 2008 we were investing in our crude corn oil extraction equipment. This year we are investing in an upgrade to our mash cooler, which we expect to cost a total of approximately $325,000.
Financing Cash Flows. Cash used in financing activities was $507,239 for the six months ended April 30, 2009, compared to $6,267,363 for the six months ended April 30, 2008. In the six month period ended April 30, 2009, cash was used to decrease the revolving line of credit balance and principle payments on the Companys EDA loans.
Indebtedness
Short-Term Debt Sources
The Company has a Loan Agreement with Minnwest Bank M.V. of Marshall, MN (the Bank). Under the Loan Agreement, the Company has a revolving line of credit with a maximum of a $10,000,000 available which is secured by substantially all of our assets. The interest rate on the revolving line of credit is at 6.0%. At April 30, 2009, the Company had a $2,090,000 outstanding balance on this line of credit.
Long-Term Debt Sources
We have paid off our term loans with FNBO and received a release of FNBOs security interest in all of our tangible and intangible property, real and personal, which had served as collateral for our term loans.
Below is a summary of our remaining long term loans payable:
Note payable to City of Granite Falls/Minnesota Investment Fund, bearing interest of 1.0% due in quarterly installments of $15,807, payable in full on June 15, 2014, secured by a second mortgage on all assets. The outstanding balance at April 30, 2009 was $322,993.
26
Note payable to City of Granite Falls/Western Minnesota Revolving Loan Fund, bearing interest of 5.0% due in semi-annual installments of $6,109, payable in full on June 15, 2016, secured by a second mortgage on all assets. The outstanding balance at April 30, 2009 was $75,641.
Note payable to City of Granite Falls/Chippewa County, bearing interest of 3.0% due in semi-annual installments of $4,030, payable in full on June 15, 2021, secured by a second mortgage on all assets. The outstanding balance at April 30, 2009 was $83,495.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.
We are exposed to the impact of market fluctuations associated with interest rates and commodity prices as discussed below. We have no exposure to foreign currency risk as all of our business is conducted in U.S. Dollars. We use derivative financial instruments as part of an overall strategy to manage market risk. We use cash, futures and option contracts to hedge changes to the commodity prices of corn, ethanol and natural gas. We do not enter into these derivative financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes, nor do we designate these contracts as hedges for accounting purposes pursuant to the requirements of SFAS 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities.
Interest Rate Risk
We are generally exposed to market risk from changes in interest rates. Exposure to interest rate risk results primarily from our revolving line of credit and letters of credit with Minnwest Bank. As of April 30, 2009, we had a $2,090,000 outstanding balance on this revolving line of credit. The specifics of these credit facilities are discussed in greater detail in Item 2 Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations Short-Term Debt Sources.
Commodity Price Risk
We seek to minimize the risks from fluctuations in the prices of raw material inputs, such as corn and natural gas, and finished products, such as ethanol and distillers grains, through the use of hedging instruments. In practice, as markets move, we actively manage our risk and adjust hedging strategies as appropriate. Although we believe our hedge positions accomplish an economic hedge against our future purchases and sales, management has chosen not to use hedge accounting, which would match the gain or loss on our hedge positions to the specific commodity purchase being hedged. We are using fair value accounting for our hedge positions, which means as the current market price of our hedge positions changes, the realized or unrealized gains and losses are immediately recognized in our cost of goods sold or as an offset to revenues. The immediate recognition of hedging gains and losses under fair value accounting can cause net income to be volatile from quarter to quarter due to the timing of the change in value of the derivative instruments relative to the cost and use of the commodity being hedged.
As corn prices move in reaction to market trends and information, our income statement will be affected depending on the impact such market movements have on the value of our derivative instruments. Depending on market movements, crop prospects and weather, these price protection positions may cause immediate adverse effects, but are expected to produce long-term positive growth for us.
A sensitivity analysis has been prepared to estimate our exposure to ethanol, corn and natural gas price risk. Market risk related to these factors is estimated as the potential change in income resulting from a hypothetical 10% adverse change in the fair value of our corn and natural gas prices and average ethanol price as of April 30, 2009, net of the forward and future contracts used to hedge our market risk for corn and natural gas usage requirements. The volumes are based on our expected use and sale of these commodities for a one year period from April 30, 2009. The results of this analysis, which may differ from actual results, are as follows:
27
|
|
Estimated Volume |
|
Unit of Measure |
|
Hypothetical |
|
Approximate |
|
|
Natural Gas |
|
475,000 |
|
MMBTU |
|
10 |
% |
$ |
285,000 |
|
Ethanol |
|
51,000,000 |
|
Gallons |
|
10 |
% |
$ |
8,364,000 |
|
Corn |
|
17,400,000 |
|
Bushels |
|
10 |
% |
$ |
6,960,000 |
|
We participate in a captive reinsurance company (Captive). The Captive reinsures losses related to workmans compensation, commercial property and general liability. Premiums are accrued by a charge to income for the period to which the premium relates and is remitted by our insurer to the captive reinsurer. The Captive reinsures losses in excess of a predetermined amount. The Captive insurer has estimated and collected a premium amount in excess of expected losses but less than the aggregate loss limits reinsured by the Captive. We have contributed limited capital surplus to the Captive that is available to fund losses should the actual losses sustained exceed premium funding. So long as the Captive is fully-funded through premiums and capital contributions to the aggregate loss limits reinsured, and the fronting insurers are financially strong, we can not be assessed over the amount of our current contributions.
Item 4T. Disclosure Controls and Procedures.
Our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and General Manager (the principal executive officer), Tracey Olson, along with our Chief Financial Officer (the principal financial officer), Stacie Schuler, have reviewed and evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of April 30, 2009. Based upon this review and evaluation, these officers have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods required by the forms and rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission; and to ensure that the information required to be disclosed by an issuer in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our management including our principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, have reviewed and evaluated any changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended April 30, 2009 and there has been no change that has materially affected or is reasonably likely to materially affect our internal control over financial reporting.
On February 4, 2009, Glacial Lakes Energy, LLC (Glacial Lakes) filed a lawsuit in Minnesota district court against Granite Falls and seven of its governors, including Ken Berg, Paul Enstad, Scott Dubbelde, Myron Peterson, Rodney Wilkison, Shannon Johnson and Julie Oftedahl-Volstad. The complaint filed by Glacial Lakes asked the court to review and determine the effect of a contract Glacial Lakes entered into with Fagen, Inc. (Fagen). On December 4, 2008, Glacial Lakes entered into a Membership Unit Purchase Agreement (the Purchase Agreement) with Fagen. The Purchase Agreement related to the conditional sale by Glacial Lakes to Fagen of 2,000 membership units that Glacial Lakes holds in Granite Falls in exchange for $2,000,000, which was paid at the time the Purchase Agreement was executed.
The transaction was conditional only upon Glacial Lakes right to sell its entire membership interest in Granite Falls, approximately 20% of the outstanding membership units, to a third party purchaser within seven months of the date the Purchase Agreement was executed. During the time between the date the Purchase Agreement was executed and the date the seven month condition expired, Fagen had the right to any distributions declared by Granite Falls. The Granite Falls Board of Governors considered the conditional transaction and believed that such a transaction met the
28
definition of a Transfer under the terms of Fifth Amended and Restated Operating and Member Control Agreement. On January 13, 2009, the Granite Falls Board of Governors adopted a resolution recognizing and approving the private transfer of 2,000 membership units from Glacial Lakes to Fagen. In response to this resolution Glacial Lakes filed its lawsuit claiming breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duties and seeking an injunction preventing the Granite Falls Board of Governors from approving the private transfer of 2,000 membership units from Glacial Lakes to Fagen.
On February 19, 2009, Granite Falls was notified that a Minnesota district court judge had granted an injunction preventing the Granite Falls Board of Governors from recognizing the sale of 2,000 membership units from Glacial Lakes to Fagen. The injunction states that no sale has occurred and nullifies the resolution adopted by the Granite Falls Board of Governors on January 13, 2009. The outcome of Glacial Lakes other claims are still pending. The Granite Falls Board of Governors is vigorously defending itself in this action. Glacial Lakes claims its damages in connection with this dispute are in excess of $50,000. No liabilities were recorded in connection with this dispute as of April 30, 2009.
The following risk factors are provided due to material changes from the risk factors previously disclosed in our annual report on Form 10-K. The risk factors set forth below should be read in conjunction with the risk factors section and the Managements Discussion and Analysis section for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2008, included in our annual report on Form 10-K.
Overcapacity within the ethanol industry has resulted in depressed ethanol prices. Excess capacity in the ethanol industry has had an adverse impact on our results of operations, cash flows and general financial condition. As of May 26, 2009, the Renewable Fuels Association reported that U.S. ethanol production capacity was approximately 12.6 billion gallons and that approximately 14% of that production capacity is not currently operational. Others estimate that 20% or more of the nations ethanol production capacity is currently idle. If excess ethanol production capacity and ethanol demand do not equalize, the market price of ethanol may decline to a level that is inadequate to generate sufficient cash flow to cover our costs.
The implementation of the renewable fuels standard (RFS) through the renewable identification number (RIN) tracking system allows blenders of ethanol and gasoline to purchase RINs rather than blend actual ethanol to meet the RFS, which is exacerbating the current excess ethanol supply problem and may in turn further depress ethanol prices and reduce our revenues. A RIN is assigned to each batch of renewable fuel a producer makes and serves as a tracking device so the Environmental Protection Agency can record exactly how much renewable fuel is being produced and blended into petroleum based fuels. The RFS and the RIN tracking system allow blenders of ethanol and gasoline to blend more ethanol than required by the RFS and to hold or sell the number of RINs tied to the excess ethanol that has been blended. During periods when relative ethanol and gasoline prices make discretionary blending economical, blenders have accumulated more RINs than they need to comply with the RFS. During periods when relative ethanol and gasoline prices discourage discretionary blending, blenders are permitted to use their excess RINs or purchase someone elses RINs to comply with the RFS. Currently, we are in a period when relative prices discourage the blending of ethanol into gasoline and blenders are using excess RINs or RINs they have purchased on the open market to meet the RFS and are not blending actual ethanol with gasoline. This practice is exacerbating the current excess ethanol supply problem and may further depress ethanol prices, which may decrease our ethanol sales and reduce revenues.
Demand for ethanol may not continue to grow unless ethanol can be blended into gasoline in higher percentage blends for conventional automobiles. Currently, ethanol is blended with conventional gasoline for use in standard (non-flex fuel) vehicles to create a blend which is 10% ethanol and 90% conventional gasoline. Estimates indicate that approximately 135 billion gallons of gasoline are sold in the United States each year. Assuming that all gasoline in the United States is blended at a rate of 10% ethanol and 90% gasoline, the maximum demand for ethanol is 13.5 billion gallons. This is commonly referred to as the blending wall, which represents a theoretical limit where more ethanol cannot be blended into the national gasoline pool. Many in the ethanol industry believe that the ethanol industry will reach this blending wall in 2009 or 2010. In order to expand demand for ethanol, higher percentage blends of ethanol must be utilized in conventional automobiles. Such higher percentage blends of ethanol have recently become a
29
contentious issue. Automobile manufacturers and environmental groups have fought against higher percentage ethanol blends. Currently, state and federal regulations prohibit the use of higher percentage ethanol blends in conventional automobiles and vehicle manufacturers have stated that using higher percentage ethanol blends in conventional vehicles would void the manufacturers warranty. Without increases in the allowable percentage blends of ethanol, demand for ethanol may not continue to increase which could decrease the selling price of ethanol and could result in our inability to operate the ethanol plant profitably which could reduce or eliminate the value of our units.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.
None.
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities.
None.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.
We held our annual members meeting on Thursday, March 19, 2009, for the purpose of electing two governors to our Board of Governors. We had three nominees for the two open governor positions. Votes were solicited in person and by proxy.
Election of Governors
The following three persons were nominated to fill two open positions on our Board of Governors. At our 2009 Annual Members Meeting two of the nominees were elected to serve on our Board of Governors until the 2012 annual members meeting and until their successors are duly elected and qualified:
Nominee |
|
Votes For |
|
Dean Buesing |
|
6,455 |
|
Dennis Wagner |
|
6,597 |
|
Rod Wilkison (incumbent) |
|
7,373 |
|
Incumbent Rod Wilkison and Dennis Wagner were elected to the Board of Governors for three year terms. The other governors whose positions on the board continued after the meeting include our at-large elected governors, Ken Berg, Paul Enstad, Shannon Johnson, and Julie Oftedahl-Volstad, our appointed governors, Chad Core, Terry Mudgett, and Mark Schmidt, as well as our alternate governor, Myron Peterson.
Mr. Wilkison was initially appointed to an at-large board seat in December 2006 and elected as an at-large governor in 2007. Mr. Wilkison has served as a member of the Audit Committee since being elected as an at-large governor in 2007. He also served as a member of the Nominating Committee for the 2008 election of governors. Mr. Wilkison has been the owner and chief executive officer of Wilkison Consulting Service since 1985. Wilkison Consulting Service provides financial consulting, tax preparation, and monthly accounting services for farmers and small businesses. Prior to starting his consulting business, Mr. Wilkison worked for two different banks for over eleven years and continues to work closely with several area banks on joint clients. Mr. Wilkison graduated from Pipestone Area Vocational Technical Institute with a degree in Agricultural Banking. Mr. Wilkison is certified by the Minnesota Department of Agriculture as a Farm Business Management Instructor.
For the past five years, Mr. Wagner has been owner and president of Wagner Construction, Inc., a highway and heavy contractor specializing in sewer, water, grading and logging operations in South International Falls, MN. He has also been president of Wagner Logging since 1974. Mr. Wagner has been president of Logs-R-Us since 1988 and president of Recreational Land Developers since 2005. From 1980 to 1984, Mr. Wagner was vice president of Derden Forest Products. From 1993 to 2003, he was president of Nagurski Oil.
30
None.
The following exhibits are included herein:
Exhibit No. |
|
Description |
|
|
|
31.1 |
|
Certificate Pursuant to 17 CFR 240.15d-14(a). |
|
|
|
31.2 |
|
Certificate Pursuant to 17 CFR 240.15d-14(a). |
|
|
|
32.1 |
|
Certificate Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350. |
|
|
|
32.2 |
|
Certificate Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350. |
In accordance with the requirements of the Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
GRANITE FALLS ENERGY, LLC |
|
|
June 12, 2009 |
/s/ Tracey L. Olson |
|
Tracey L. Olson |
|
Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
June 12, 2009 |
/s/ Stacie Schuler |
|
Stacie Schuler |
|
Chief Financial Officer |
31