GRAPHIC PACKAGING HOLDING CO - Quarter Report: 2011 March (Form 10-Q)
Table of Contents
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
þ | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2011
or
o | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
COMMISSION FILE NUMBER: 001-33988
Graphic Packaging Holding Company
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
26-0405422 (I.R.S. employer identification no.) |
|
814 Livingston Court Marietta, Georgia (Address of principal executive offices) |
30067 (Zip Code) |
(770) 644-3000
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer o | Accelerated filer þ | Non-accelerated filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act).
Yes o No þ
As
of April 18, 2011, there were 343,730,747 shares of the registrants Common Stock, par
value $0.01 per share, outstanding.
Table of Contents
Information Concerning Forward-Looking Statements
Certain statements regarding the expectations of Graphic Packaging Holding Company (GPHC and,
together with its subsidiaries, the Company), including, but not limited to, statements regarding
cost savings from its continuous improvement programs, capital investment, depreciation and
amortization, interest expense, net debt reduction, pension plan
contributions and postretirement health care benefit payments, in this report
constitute forward-looking statements as defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act
of 1995. Such statements are based on currently available operating, financial and competitive
information and are subject to various risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to
differ materially from the Companys historical experience and its present expectations. These
risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, the Companys substantial amount of debt,
inflation of and volatility in raw material and energy costs, continuing pressure for lower cost
products, the Companys ability to implement its business strategies, including productivity
initiatives and cost reduction plans, currency movements and other risks of conducting business
internationally, and the impact of regulatory and litigation matters, including those that could
limit the Companys ability to utilize its net operating losses to offset taxable income and those
that impact the Companys ability to protect and use its intellectual property. Undue reliance
should not be placed on such forward-looking statements, as such statements speak only as of the
date on which they are made and the Company undertakes no obligation to update such statements.
Additional information regarding these and other risks is contained in Part I, Item 1A., Risk
Factors of the Companys 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K and in other filings with the Securities
and Exchange Commission.
2
Table of Contents
TABLE OF CONTENTS
3
Table of Contents
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
GRAPHIC PACKAGING HOLDING COMPANY
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||
In millions, except per share amounts | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||
Net Sales |
$ | 1,000.6 | $ | 1,004.1 | ||||
Cost of Sales |
842.4 | 858.3 | ||||||
Selling, General and Administrative |
89.5 | 77.4 | ||||||
Other Expense, Net |
0.1 | 0.3 | ||||||
Restructuring and Other Special Charges |
| 8.5 | ||||||
Income from Operations |
68.6 | 59.6 | ||||||
Interest Expense, Net |
(39.3 | ) | (45.0 | ) | ||||
Income before Income Taxes and Equity Income of Unconsolidated Entities |
29.3 | 14.6 | ||||||
Income Tax Expense |
(2.9 | ) | (8.6 | ) | ||||
Income before Equity Income of Unconsolidated Entities |
26.4 | 6.0 | ||||||
Equity Income of Unconsolidated Entities |
0.3 | 0.3 | ||||||
Net Income |
$ | 26.7 | $ | 6.3 | ||||
Income Per Share Basic |
$ | 0.08 | $ | 0.02 | ||||
Income Per Share Diluted |
$ | 0.08 | $ | 0.02 | ||||
Weighted Average Number of Shares Outstanding Basic |
344.2 | 343.4 | ||||||
Weighted Average Number of Shares Outstanding Diluted |
349.8 | 346.9 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
4
Table of Contents
GRAPHIC PACKAGING HOLDING COMPANY
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Unaudited)
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Unaudited)
March 31, | December 31, | |||||||
In millions, except share and per share amounts | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||
Current Assets: |
||||||||
Cash and Cash Equivalents |
$ | 109.1 | $ | 138.7 | ||||
Receivables, Net |
409.2 | 382.2 | ||||||
Inventories, Net |
490.5 | 417.3 | ||||||
Other Current Assets |
72.8 | 75.4 | ||||||
Total Current Assets |
1,081.6 | 1,013.6 | ||||||
Property, Plant and Equipment, Net |
1,623.0 | 1,641.5 | ||||||
Goodwill |
1,206.3 | 1,205.2 | ||||||
Intangible Assets, Net |
565.5 | 576.6 | ||||||
Other Assets |
47.7 | 47.7 | ||||||
Total Assets |
$ | 4,524.1 | $ | 4,484.6 | ||||
LIABILITIES |
||||||||
Current Liabilities: |
||||||||
Short-Term Debt and Current Portion of Long-Term Debt |
$ | 26.9 | $ | 26.0 | ||||
Accounts Payable |
359.0 | 361.5 | ||||||
Interest Payable |
41.3 | 28.4 | ||||||
Other Accrued Liabilities |
165.4 | 179.8 | ||||||
Total Current Liabilities |
592.6 | 595.7 | ||||||
Long-Term Debt |
2,553.1 | 2,553.1 | ||||||
Deferred Income Tax Liabilities |
244.2 | 241.1 | ||||||
Other Noncurrent Liabilities |
342.5 | 347.7 | ||||||
Total Liabilities |
3,732.4 | 3,737.6 | ||||||
SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
||||||||
Preferred Stock, par value $.01 per share; 100,000,000 shares authorized; no shares issued or outstanding |
| | ||||||
Common Stock, par value $.01 per share; 1,000,000,000 shares authorized; 343,730,747 and 343,698,778
shares issued and outstanding at March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively |
3.4 | 3.4 | ||||||
Capital in Excess of Par Value |
1,967.4 | 1,965.2 | ||||||
Accumulated Deficit |
(981.6 | ) | (1,008.3 | ) | ||||
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss |
(197.5 | ) | (213.3 | ) | ||||
Total Shareholders Equity |
791.7 | 747.0 | ||||||
Total Liabilities and Shareholders Equity |
$ | 4,524.1 | $ | 4,484.6 | ||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
5
Table of Contents
GRAPHIC PACKAGING HOLDING COMPANY
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||
In millions | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: |
||||||||
Net Income |
$ | 26.7 | $ | 6.3 | ||||
Non-cash Items Included in Net Income: |
||||||||
Depreciation and Amortization |
71.0 | 74.3 | ||||||
Deferred Income Taxes |
2.8 | 7.9 | ||||||
Amount of Postemployment Expense Less Than Funding |
(3.0 | ) | (1.4 | ) | ||||
Other, Net |
7.7 | 7.0 | ||||||
Changes in Operating Assets and Liabilities |
(99.1 | ) | (119.3 | ) | ||||
Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Operating Activities |
6.1 | (25.2 | ) | |||||
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: |
||||||||
Capital Spending |
(36.8 | ) | (18.2 | ) | ||||
Other, Net |
(0.8 | ) | (1.1 | ) | ||||
Net Cash Used in Investing Activities |
(37.6 | ) | (19.3 | ) | ||||
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: |
||||||||
Borrowings under Revolving Credit Facilities |
11.2 | 96.0 | ||||||
Payments on Revolving Credit Facilities |
(10.6 | ) | (95.8 | ) | ||||
Other, Net |
0.1 | | ||||||
Net Cash Provided by Financing Activities |
0.7 | 0.2 | ||||||
Effect of Exchange Rate Changes on Cash |
1.2 | 0.1 | ||||||
Net Decrease in Cash and Cash Equivalents |
(29.6 | ) | (44.2 | ) | ||||
Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Period |
138.7 | 149.8 | ||||||
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF PERIOD |
$ | 109.1 | $ | 105.6 | ||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
6
Table of Contents
GRAPHIC PACKAGING HOLDING COMPANY
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
NOTE 1 GENERAL INFORMATION
Nature of Business and Basis of Presentation
Graphic Packaging Holding Company (GPHC and, together with its subsidiaries, the Company) is a
leading provider of packaging solutions for a wide variety of products to food, beverage and other
consumer products companies. The Company is the largest U.S. producer of folding cartons and holds
a leading market position in coated unbleached kraft paperboard, coated-recycled boxboard and
flexible packaging. The Companys customers include some of the most widely recognized companies in
the world. The Company strives to provide its customers with packaging solutions designed to
deliver marketing and performance benefits at a competitive cost by capitalizing on its low-cost
paperboard mills and converting plants, its proprietary carton and packaging designs, and its
commitment to customer service.
GPHC and Graphic Packaging Corporation (GPC) conduct no significant business and have no
independent assets or operations other than GPHCs ownership of all of GPCs outstanding common
stock, and GPCs ownership of all of Graphic Packaging International, Inc.s (GPII) outstanding
common stock.
The Companys Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements include all subsidiaries in which the
Company has the ability to exercise direct or indirect control over operating and financial
policies. Intercompany transactions and balances are eliminated in consolidation.
In the Companys opinion, the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements contain all
normal recurring adjustments necessary to present fairly the financial position, results of
operations and cash flows for the interim periods. The Companys year end Consolidated Balance
Sheet data was derived from audited financial statements. The accompanying unaudited Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements have been prepared in accordance with instructions to Form 10-Q
and Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X and do not include all the information required by accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America (U.S. GAAP) for complete financial
statements. Therefore, these Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements should be read in
conjunction with GPHCs Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010. In
addition, the preparation of the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in conformity with
U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of
assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses
during the reporting period. Actual amounts could differ from those estimates and changes in these
statements are recorded as known.
For a summary of the Companys significant accounting policies, please refer to GPHCs Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.
Adoption of New Accounting Standards
Effective January 1, 2011, the Company adopted guidance as required by the Revenue Recognition
topic of the FASB Codification which requires vendors to account for transactions with the same
customer involving multiple products or services (deliverables) separately rather than as a
combined unit. The adoption did not have a material impact on the Companys financial position,
results of operations or cash flows.
7
Table of Contents
NOTE 2 INVENTORIES, NET
Inventories, Net by major class:
March 31, | December 31, | |||||||
In millions | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||
Finished Goods |
$ | 277.1 | $ | 231.7 | ||||
Work in Progress |
46.0 | 36.5 | ||||||
Raw Materials |
119.8 | 102.0 | ||||||
Supplies |
64.7 | 65.6 | ||||||
507.6 | 435.8 | |||||||
Less: Allowance |
(17.1 | ) | (18.5 | ) | ||||
Total |
$ | 490.5 | $ | 417.3 | ||||
NOTE 3 DEBT
There were no significant changes in the Companys debt agreements during the three months ended
March 31, 2011. For more information regarding the characteristics of the Companys debt, see Note
6 Debt of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements of the Companys 2010 Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
Long-Term Debt is composed of the following:
March 31, | December 31, | |||||||
In millions | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||
Senior Notes with interest payable semi-annually at 7.875%, payable in 2018 ($250.0 million face amount) |
$ | 246.1 | $ | 246.0 | ||||
Senior Notes with interest payable semi-annually at 9.5%, payable in 2017 ($425.0 million face amount) |
423.4 | 423.5 | ||||||
Senior Subordinated Notes with interest payable semi-annually at 9.5%, payable in 2013 |
73.3 | 73.3 | ||||||
Senior Secured Term Loan Facility with interest payable at various dates at floating rates (2.30% at March 31, 2011) payable through 2014 |
837.7 | 837.7 | ||||||
Senior Secured Term Loan Facility with interest payable at various dates at floating rates (3.05% at March 31, 2011) payable through 2014 |
989.9 | 989.9 | ||||||
Senior Secured Revolving Facility with interest payable at various dates at floating rates (2.52% at March 31, 2011) payable in 2013 |
| | ||||||
Other |
2.4 | 2.0 | ||||||
2,572.8 | 2,572.4 | |||||||
Less: current portion |
19.7 | 19.3 | ||||||
Total |
$ | 2,553.1 | $ | 2,553.1 | ||||
At March 31, 2011, the Company and its U.S. and international subsidiaries had the following
commitments, amounts outstanding and amounts available under revolving credit facilities:
Total | Total | Total | ||||||||||
In millions | Commitments | Outstanding | Available(a) | |||||||||
Revolving Credit Facility |
$ | 400.0 | $ | | $ | 363.6 | ||||||
International Facilities |
17.1 | 7.2 | 9.9 | |||||||||
Total |
$ | 417.1 | $ | 7.2 | $ | 373.5 | ||||||
Note:
(a) | In accordance with its debt agreements, the Companys availability under its Revolving Credit
Facility has been reduced by the amount of standby letters of credit issued of $36.4 million
as of March 31, 2011. These letters of credit are primarily used as security against its
self-insurance obligations and workers compensation obligations. These letters of credit
expire at various dates in 2012 unless extended. |
8
Table of Contents
The Credit Agreement and the indentures governing the 9.5% Senior Notes due 2017, the 9.5% Senior
Subordinated Notes due 2013, and the 7.875% Senior Notes due 2018 (the Indentures) limit the
Companys ability to incur additional indebtedness. Additional covenants contained in the Credit
Agreement and the Indentures, among other things, restrict the ability of the Company to dispose of
assets, incur guarantee obligations, prepay other indebtedness, make dividend and other restricted
payments, create liens, make equity or debt investments, make acquisitions, modify terms of the
Indentures, engage in mergers or consolidations, change the business conducted by the Company and
its subsidiaries, and engage in certain transactions with affiliates. Such restrictions, together
with the highly leveraged nature of the Company, could limit the Companys ability to respond to
changing market conditions, fund its capital spending program, provide for unexpected capital
investments or take advantage of business opportunities. As of March 31, 2011, the Company was in
compliance with the covenants in the Credit Agreement.
NOTE 4 STOCK INCENTIVE PLANS
The Company has five equity compensation plans, but since 2004 the Companys only plan pursuant to
which new grants are made is the Graphic Packaging Holding Company Amended and Restated 2004 Stock
and Incentive Compensation plan (previously named the Graphic Packaging Corporation 2004 Stock and
Incentive Compensation Plan) (the 2004 Plan). Stock options and other awards granted under all of
the Companys plans generally vest and expire in accordance with terms established at the time of
grant. Shares issued pursuant to awards under the plans are from the Companys authorized but
unissued shares. Compensation costs are recognized on a straight-line basis over the requisite
service period of the award.
Stock Awards, Restricted Stock and Restricted Stock Units
The Companys 2004 Plan permits the grant of stock awards, restricted stock and RSUs. All RSUs vest
and become payable in one to five years from date of grant. Upon vesting, RSUs are payable in cash
and shares of common stock, based on the proportion set forth in the grant agreements.
Data concerning RSUs and stock awards granted in the first three months of 2011 is as follows:
Weighted Avg. | ||||||||
Grant Date Fair | ||||||||
Shares in thousands | Shares | Value Per Share | ||||||
RSUs Employees |
3,946 | $ | 5.17 |
During the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, $8.6 million and $2.2 million, respectively,
were charged to compensation expense for stock incentive plans.
NOTE 5 PENSIONS AND OTHER POSTRETIREMENT BENEFITS
The Company maintains both defined benefit pension plans and postretirement health care plans that
provide medical and life insurance coverage to eligible salaried and hourly retired employees in
North America and their dependents. The Company maintains international defined benefit pension
plans which are both noncontributory and contributory and are funded in accordance with applicable
local laws. Pension or termination benefits are based primarily on years of service and the
employees compensation.
Currently, the North American plans are closed to newly-hired salaried and non-union hourly
employees. The U.K. defined benefit plan was frozen effective March 31, 2001 and replaced with a
defined contribution plan.
9
Table of Contents
Pension and Postretirement Expense
The pension and postretirement expenses related to the Companys plans consisted of the following:
Postretirement Health | ||||||||||||||||
Pension Benefits | Care Benefits | |||||||||||||||
Three Months Ended March 31, | ||||||||||||||||
In millions | 2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||||||||
Components of Net Periodic Cost: |
||||||||||||||||
Service Cost |
$ | 4.8 | $ | 5.0 | $ | 0.3 | $ | 0.3 | ||||||||
Interest Cost |
13.1 | 12.7 | 0.7 | 0.7 | ||||||||||||
Expected Return on Plan Assets |
(14.3 | ) | (12.7 | ) | | | ||||||||||
Amortization: |
||||||||||||||||
Prior Service Cost |
0.1 | 0.1 | | | ||||||||||||
Actuarial Loss (Gain) |
3.0 | 2.3 | (0.2 | ) | (0.5 | ) | ||||||||||
Net Periodic Cost |
$ | 6.7 | $ | 7.4 | $ | 0.8 | $ | 0.5 | ||||||||
Employer Contributions
The Company made contributions of $10.2 million and $8.7 million to its pension plans during the
first three months of 2011 and 2010, respectively. The Company expects to make contributions of $45
million to $70 million for the full year 2011. During 2010, the Company made $47.3 million of
contributions to its pension plans.
The Company made postretirement health care benefit payments of $0.3 million and $0.6 million
during the first three months of 2011 and 2010, respectively. The Company estimates its
postretirement health care benefit payments for the full year 2011 to be approximately $4 million.
During 2010, the Company made postretirement health care benefit payments of $3.2 million.
NOTE 6 FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS AND FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENT
The Company enters into derivative instruments for risk management purposes only, including
derivatives designated as hedging instruments under the Derivatives and Hedging topic of the FASB
Codification and those not designated as hedging instruments under this guidance. The Company uses
interest rate swaps, natural gas swap contracts, and forward exchange contracts. These derivative
instruments are designated as cash flow hedges and, to the extent they are effective in offsetting
the variability of the hedged cash flows, changes in the derivatives fair value are not included
in current earnings but are included in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss. These changes in fair
value will subsequently be reclassified to earnings.
Interest Rate Risk
The Company uses interest rate swaps to manage interest rate risks on future interest payments
caused by interest rate changes on its variable rate term loan facility. The differential to be
paid or received under these agreements is recognized as an adjustment to Interest Expense related
to debt. At March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010 the Company had interest rate swap agreements
with a notional amount of $1,250.0 million which expire on various dates from 2011 to 2012 under
which the Company will pay fixed rates of 2.24% to 3.84% and receive three-month LIBOR rates.
Changes in fair value will subsequently be reclassified into earnings as a component of Interest
Expense, Net as interest is incurred on amounts outstanding under the term loan facility.
Ineffectiveness measured in the hedging relationship is recorded in earnings in the period it
occurs.
During the first three months of 2011 and 2010, there were no amounts or minimal amounts of
ineffectiveness related to changes in the fair value of interest rate swap agreements.
Additionally, there were no amounts excluded from the measure of effectiveness.
10
Table of Contents
Commodity Risk
To manage risks associated with future variability in cash flows and price risk attributable to
certain commodity purchases, the Company enters into natural gas swap contracts to hedge prices for
a designated percentage of its expected natural gas usage. The Company has entered into natural
gas swap contracts to hedge price for approximately 48% of its expected natural gas usage for the
remainder of 2011 with a weighted average contractual rate of $4.71 per one million British Thermal
Units. Such contracts are designated as cash flow hedges. The contracts are carried at fair value
with changes in fair value recognized in Other Comprehensive Income (Loss), and the resulting gain
or loss is reclassified into Cost of Sales concurrently with the recognition of the commodity
purchased. The ineffective portion of the swap contracts change in fair value, if any, would be
recognized immediately in earnings.
During the first three months of 2011 and 2010, there were minimal amounts of ineffectiveness
related to changes in the fair value of natural gas swap contracts. Additionally, there were no
amounts excluded from the measure of effectiveness.
Foreign Currency Risk
The Company enters into forward exchange contracts to manage risks associated with future
variability in cash flows resulting from anticipated foreign currency transactions that may be
adversely affected by changes in exchange rates. Such contracts are designated as cash flow hedges.
The contracts are carried at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in Other
Comprehensive Income (Loss), and gains/losses related to these contracts are recognized in Other
Expense, Net when the anticipated transaction affects income. At March 31, 2011, multiple forward
exchange contracts existed that expire on various dates through 2012. Those purchased forward
exchange contracts outstanding at March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, when aggregated and
measured in U.S. dollars at contractual rates at March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010,
respectively, had notional amounts totaling $60.2 million and $58.7 million.
No amounts were reclassified to earnings during the first three months of 2011 or during 2010 in
connection with forecasted transactions that were no longer considered probable of occurring, and
there was no amount of ineffectiveness related to changes in the fair value of foreign currency
forward contracts. Additionally, there were no amounts excluded from the measure of effectiveness.
Derivatives not Designated as Hedges
The Company enters into forward exchange contracts to effectively hedge substantially all of
accounts receivable resulting from transactions denominated in foreign currencies in order to
manage risks associated with foreign currency transactions adversely affected by changes in
exchange rates. At March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, multiple foreign currency forward exchange
contracts existed, with maturities ranging up to three months. Those foreign currency exchange
contracts outstanding at March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, when aggregated and measured in U.S.
dollars at exchange rates at March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively, had net notional
amounts totaling $18.9 million and $8.2 million. Unrealized gains and losses resulting from these
contracts are recognized in Other Expense, Net and approximately offset corresponding recognized
but unrealized gains and losses on these accounts receivable.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The Companys derivative instruments are carried at fair value. The Company has determined that the
inputs to the valuation of these derivative instruments are level 2 in the fair value hierarchy.
Level 2 inputs are defined as quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets or
inputs that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly through market
corroboration, for substantially the full term of the financial instrument. The Company uses
valuation techniques based on discounted cash flow analyses, which reflects the terms of the
derivatives and uses observable market-based inputs, including forward rates and uses market price
quotations obtained from independent derivatives brokers.
As of March 31, 2011, there has not been any significant impact to the fair value of the Companys
derivative liabilities due to its own credit risk. Similarly, there has not been any significant
adverse impact to the Companys derivative assets based on evaluation of the Companys
counterparties credit risks.
11
Table of Contents
The fair value of the Companys derivative instruments is as follows:
Derivative | Derivative | |||||||||||||||||||
Assets | Liabilities | |||||||||||||||||||
Balance Sheet | March 31, | December 31, | Balance Sheet | March 31, | December 31, | |||||||||||||||
In millions | Location | 2011 | 2010 | Location | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||||||||||
Derivative Contracts
Designated as Hedging
Instruments |
||||||||||||||||||||
Commodity Contracts |
Other Current Assets | $ | | $ | 0.1 | Other Accrued Liabilities | $ | 0.3 | $ | 0.8 | ||||||||||
Foreign Currency Contracts |
Other Current Assets | 0.3 | 0.7 | Other Accrued Liabilities and Other Noncurrent Liabilities | 0.8 | 0.6 | ||||||||||||||
Interest Rate Swap Agreements |
Other Current Assets | | | Other Accrued Liabilities, Other Noncurrent Liabilities, and Interest Payable | 26.1 | 33.3 | ||||||||||||||
Total Derivative Contracts |
$ | 0.3 | $ | 0.8 | $ | 27.2 | $ | 34.7 | ||||||||||||
The fair values of the Companys other financial assets and liabilities at March 31, 2011 and
December 31, 2010 approximately equal the carrying values reported on the Consolidated Balance
Sheets except for Long-Term Debt. The fair value of the Companys Long-Term Debt was $2,636.3
million and $2,626.8 million as compared to the carrying amounts of $2,572.8 million and $2,572.4
million as of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively. The fair value of Long-Term Debt
is based on quoted market prices.
Effect of Derivative Instruments
The effect of derivative instruments in cash flow hedging relationships on the Companys
Consolidated Statements of Operations is as follows:
Amount of Loss (Gain) | Amount of Loss | Amount of Loss (Gain) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Recognized in | Recognized in Statement of | Recognized in Statement of | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Accumulated Other | Operations | Operations | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive Loss | Location | (Effective Portion) | Location | (Ineffective Portion) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Three Months Ended | in Statement of | Three Months Ended | in Statement of | Three Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
March 31, | Operations | March 31, | Operations | March 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Effective | (Ineffective | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
In millions | 2011 | 2010 | Portion) | 2011 | 2010 | Portion) | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Commodity
Contracts |
$ | 0.9 | $ | 7.0 | Cost of Sales | $ | 1.7 | $ | 0.1 | Cost of Sales | $ | | $ | 0.2 | ||||||||||||||
Foreign Currency
Contracts |
0.7 | (1.5 | ) | Other Expense, Net | 0.4 | 0.8 | Other Expense, Net | | | |||||||||||||||||||
Interest Rate Swap Agreements |
0.8 | 12.2 | Interest Expense, Net | 7.7 | 9.5 | Interest Expense, Net | | (0.2 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 2.4 | $ | 17.7 | $ | 9.8 | $ | 10.4 | $ | | $ | | ||||||||||||||||
The effect of derivative instruments not designated as hedging instruments on the Companys
Consolidated Statements of Operations is for the three months ended March 31 is as follows:
In millions | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||||
Foreign Currency Contracts |
Other Expense, Net | $ | 0.7 | $ | 0.1 | |||||
12
Table of Contents
Accumulated Derivative Instruments (Loss) Gain
The following is a rollforward of Accumulated Derivative Instruments (Loss) Gain which is included
within Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income in the Companys Consolidated Balance Sheets:
In millions | ||||
Balance at December 31, 2010 |
$ | (27.4 | ) | |
Reclassification to earnings |
9.8 | |||
Current period change in fair value |
(2.4 | ) | ||
Balance at March 31, 2011 |
$ | (20.0 | ) | |
At March 31, 2011, the Company expects to reclassify $19.7 million of losses in the next twelve
months from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss to earnings, contemporaneously with and offsetting
changes in the related hedged exposure. The actual amount that will be reclassified to future
earnings may vary from this amount as a result of changes in market conditions.
NOTE 7 INCOME TAXES
During
the first three months of 2011, the Company recognized Income Tax
Expense of $2.9 million on Income before Income Taxes and Equity
Income of Unconsolidated Entities of $29.3 million. During the
first three months of 2010, the Company recognized Income Tax Expense
of $8.6 million on Income before Income Taxes and Equity Income
of Unconsolidated Entities of $14.6 million. Income Tax Expense
for the first three months of 2011 and 2010 primarily relates to the
non-cash expense of $5.6 million and $7.9 million,
respectively, associated with the amortization of goodwill for tax
purposes. The reduction was due to a portion of goodwill being fully
amortized at the end of 2010. The Company also recorded a benefit
related to certain discrete events including the revision of state
tax positions and the expiration of the statute of limitation
associated with reserves in a foreign jurisdiction. The Company has
approximately $1.3 billion of NOLs for U.S. federal income tax
purposes, which may be used to offset future taxable income.
NOTE 8 COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
The following table shows the components of Comprehensive Income (Loss):
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||
In millions | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||
Net Income |
$ | 26.7 | $ | 6.3 | ||||
Other Comprehensive Income (Loss): |
||||||||
Derivative Instruments Income (Loss) |
7.4 | (7.3 | ) | |||||
Pension Benefit Plans |
3.1 | 2.4 | ||||||
Postretirement Benefit Plans |
(0.2 | ) | (0.5 | ) | ||||
Postemployment Benefit Plans |
| 0.1 | ||||||
Currency Translation Adjustment |
5.5 | (0.8 | ) | |||||
Total Comprehensive Income |
$ | 42.5 | $ | 0.2 | ||||
NOTE 9 ENVIRONMENTAL AND LEGAL MATTERS
Environmental Matters
The Company is subject to a broad range of foreign, federal, state and local environmental, health
and safety laws and regulations, including those governing discharges to air, soil and water, the
management, treatment and disposal of hazardous substances, solid waste and hazardous wastes, the
investigation and remediation of contamination resulting from historical site operations and
releases of hazardous substances, and the health and safety of employees. Compliance initiatives
could result in significant costs, which could negatively impact the Companys consolidated
financial position, results of operations or cash flows. Any failure to comply with environmental
or health and safety laws and regulations or any permits and authorizations required thereunder
could subject the Company to fines, corrective action or other sanctions.
Some of the Companys current and former facilities are the subject of environmental investigations
and remediations resulting from historical operations and the release of hazardous substances or
other constituents. Some current and former facilities have a history of industrial usage for which
investigation and remediation obligations may be imposed in the future or for which indemnification
claims may be asserted against the Company. Also, potential future closures or sales of facilities
may necessitate further investigation and may result in future remediation at those facilities.
On October 8, 2007, the Company received a notice from the United States Environmental Protection
Agency (the EPA) indicating that it is a potentially responsible party for the remedial
investigation and feasibility study to be conducted at the Devils Swamp Lake site in East Baton
Rouge Parish, Louisiana. The Company believes it is a de minimis contributor to the site and
expects to enter into
13
Table of Contents
negotiations with the EPA and other potentially responsible parties regarding
its potential responsibility and liability, but it is too early in the investigation process to
quantify possible costs with respect to such site.
The Company has established reserves for those facilities or issues where liability is probable and
the costs are reasonably estimable. The Company believes that the amounts accrued for all of its
loss contingencies, and the reasonably possible loss beyond the amounts accrued, are not material
to the Companys consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows. The Company
cannot estimate with certainty other future corrective compliance, investigation or remediation
costs. Costs relating to historical usage that the Company considers to be reasonably possible of
resulting in liability are not quantifiable at this time. The Company will continue to monitor
environmental issues at each of its facilities, as well as regulatory developments, and will revise
its accruals, estimates and disclosures relating to past, present and future operations, as
additional information is obtained.
Legal Matters
The Company is a party to a number of lawsuits arising in the ordinary conduct of its business.
Although the timing and outcome of these lawsuits cannot be predicted with certainty, the Company
does not believe that disposition of these lawsuits will have a material adverse effect on the
Companys consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
NOTE
10 BUSINESS SEGMENT INFORMATION
The Company reports its results in two business segments: paperboard packaging and flexible
packaging. These segments are evaluated by the chief operating decision maker based primarily on
Income from Operations. The Companys reportable segments are based upon strategic business units
that offer different products. The accounting policies of the reportable segments are the same as
those described in GPHCs Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.
The paperboard packaging segment is highly integrated and includes a system of mills and plants
that produces a broad range of paperboard grades convertible into folding cartons. Folding cartons
are used primarily to protect products, such as food, detergents, paper products, beverages, and
health and beauty aids, while providing point of purchase advertising. The paperboard packaging
business segment includes the design, manufacture and installation of packaging machinery related
to the assembly of cartons and the production and sale of corrugated medium and kraft paper from
paperboard mills in the U.S.
The flexible packaging segment converts kraft and specialty paper into multi-wall bags, consumer
and specialty retail bags and produces flexible packaging, label solutions and laminations. The
bags are designed to ship and protect a wide range of industrial and consumer products including
fertilizers, chemicals, concrete and pet and food products. The flexible packaging, label solutions
and laminations are converted from a wide variety of technologically advanced films for use in the
food, pharmaceutical and industrial end-markets. Flexible packaging paper and metallicized paper
labels and heat transfer labels are used in a wide range of consumer applications.
Business segment information is as follows:
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||
In millions | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||
NET SALES: |
||||||||
Paperboard Packaging |
$ | 825.0 | $ | 834.6 | ||||
Flexible Packaging |
175.6 | 169.5 | ||||||
Total |
$ | 1,000.6 | $ | 1,004.1 | ||||
INCOME (LOSS) FROM OPERATIONS: |
||||||||
Paperboard Packaging |
$ | 74.4 | $ | 75.7 | ||||
Flexible Packaging |
6.0 | 6.7 | ||||||
Corporate |
(11.8 | ) | (22.8 | ) | ||||
Total |
$ | 68.6 | $ | 59.6 | ||||
14
Table of Contents
NOTE
11 EARNINGS PER SHARE
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||
In millions, except per share data | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||
Net Income |
$ | 26.7 | $ | 6.3 | ||||
Weighted Average Shares: |
||||||||
Basic |
344.2 | 343.4 | ||||||
Dilutive Effect of Stock Awards |
5.6 | 3.5 | ||||||
Diluted |
349.8 | 346.9 | ||||||
Earnings Per Share Basic and Diluted |
$ | 0.08 | $ | 0.02 | ||||
The following are the potentially dilutive securities excluded from the above calculation because
the effect would have been anti-dilutive:
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Employee Stock Options |
4,504,572 | 4,892,072 | ||||||
15
Table of Contents
NOTE 12 GUARANTOR CONSOLIDATING FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
These Consolidating Financial Statements reflect GPHC and GPC (collectively the Parent); GPII
(the Subsidiary Issuer); and the Subsidiary Guarantors, which consist of all material 100% owned
subsidiaries of GPII other than its foreign subsidiaries. The nonguarantor subsidiaries are herein
referred to as Nonguarantor Subsidiaries. Separate complete financial statements of the
Subsidiary Guarantors are not presented because the guarantors are jointly and severally, fully and
unconditionally liable under the guarantees.
Three Months Ended March 31, 2011 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Combined | Combined | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Subsidiary | Guarantor | Nonguarantor | Consolidating | |||||||||||||||||||||
In millions | Parent | Issuer | Subsidiaries | Subsidiaries | Eliminations | Consolidated | ||||||||||||||||||
Net Sales |
$ | | $ | 811.2 | $ | 136.9 | $ | 107.6 | $ | (55.1 | ) | $ | 1,000.6 | |||||||||||
Cost of Sales |
| 680.5 | 119.2 | 97.8 | (55.1 | ) | 842.4 | |||||||||||||||||
Selling, General and Administrative |
| 72.9 | 9.0 | 7.6 | | 89.5 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other Expense (Income), Net |
| (0.1 | ) | | 0.2 | | 0.1 | |||||||||||||||||
Income from Operations |
| 57.9 | 8.7 | 2.0 | | 68.6 | ||||||||||||||||||
Interest Expense, Net |
| (39.0 | ) | | (0.3 | ) | | (39.3 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Income before Income Taxes and Equity
Income of Unconsolidated Entities |
| 18.9 | 8.7 | 1.7 | | 29.3 | ||||||||||||||||||
Income Tax Expense |
| (2.8 | ) | | (0.1 | ) | | (2.9 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Income before Equity Income of
Unconsolidated Entities |
| 16.1 | 8.7 | 1.6 | | 26.4 | ||||||||||||||||||
Equity Income of Unconsolidated Entities |
| | | 0.3 | | 0.3 | ||||||||||||||||||
Equity in Net Earnings of Subsidiaries |
26.7 | 10.6 | (0.4 | ) | | (36.9 | ) | | ||||||||||||||||
Net Income |
$ | 26.7 | $ | 26.7 | $ | 8.3 | $ | 1.9 | $ | (36.9 | ) | $ | 26.7 | |||||||||||
16
Table of Contents
Three Months Ended March 31, 2010 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Combined | Combined | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Subsidiary | Guarantor | Nonguarantor | Consolidating | |||||||||||||||||||||
In millions | Parent | Issuer | Subsidiaries | Subsidiaries | Eliminations | Consolidated | ||||||||||||||||||
Net Sales |
$ | | $ | 808.0 | $ | 133.5 | $ | 98.8 | $ | (36.2 | ) | $ | 1,004.1 | |||||||||||
Cost of Sales |
| 686.2 | 115.6 | 92.7 | (36.2 | ) | 858.3 | |||||||||||||||||
Selling, General and Administrative |
| 61.0 | 8.7 | 7.7 | | 77.4 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other Expense (Income), Net |
| 1.1 | | (0.8 | ) | | 0.3 | |||||||||||||||||
Restructuring and Other Special Charges |
| 8.4 | 0.1 | | | 8.5 | ||||||||||||||||||
Income (Loss) from Operations |
| 51.3 | 9.1 | (0.8 | ) | | 59.6 | |||||||||||||||||
Interest Expense, Net |
| (44.6 | ) | | (0.4 | ) | | (45.0 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Income (Loss) before Income Taxes and
Equity Income of Unconsolidated
Entities |
| 6.7 | 9.1 | (1.2 | ) | | 14.6 | |||||||||||||||||
Income Tax Expense |
| (7.7 | ) | | (0.9 | ) | | (8.6 | ) | |||||||||||||||
(Loss) Income before Equity Income of
Unconsolidated Entities |
| (1.0 | ) | 9.1 | (2.1 | ) | | 6.0 | ||||||||||||||||
Equity Income of Unconsolidated Entities |
| | | 0.3 | | 0.3 | ||||||||||||||||||
Equity in Net Earnings of Subsidiaries |
6.3 | 7.3 | 1.3 | | (14.9 | ) | | |||||||||||||||||
Net Income (Loss) |
$ | 6.3 | $ | 6.3 | $ | 10.4 | $ | (1.8 | ) | $ | (14.9 | ) | $ | 6.3 | ||||||||||
17
Table of Contents
March 31, 2011 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Combined | Combined | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Subsidiary | Guarantor | Nonguarantor | Consolidating | |||||||||||||||||||||
In millions | Parent | Issuer | Subsidiaries | Subsidiaries | Eliminations | Consolidated | ||||||||||||||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Current Assets: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash and Cash Equivalents |
$ | | $ | 74.5 | $ | | $ | 34.6 | $ | | $ | 109.1 | ||||||||||||
Receivables, Net |
| 282.9 | 51.8 | 74.5 | | 409.2 | ||||||||||||||||||
Inventories, Net |
| 363.7 | 66.3 | 60.5 | | 490.5 | ||||||||||||||||||
Intercompany |
11.0 | 148.9 | (99.1 | ) | (60.8 | ) | | | ||||||||||||||||
Other Current Assets |
| 67.6 | 1.0 | 4.2 | | 72.8 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total Current Assets |
11.0 | 937.6 | 20.0 | 113.0 | | 1,081.6 | ||||||||||||||||||
Property, Plant and Equipment, Net |
| 1,443.1 | 116.6 | 63.5 | (0.2 | ) | 1,623.0 | |||||||||||||||||
Investment in Consolidated Subsidiaries |
780.7 | 242.2 | 2.8 | 141.4 | (1,167.1 | ) | | |||||||||||||||||
Goodwill |
| 1,170.8 | | 35.5 | | 1,206.3 | ||||||||||||||||||
Intangible Assets, Net |
| 553.7 | | 11.8 | | 565.5 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other Assets |
| 35.9 | 0.1 | 11.7 | | 47.7 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total Assets |
$ | 791.7 | $ | 4,383.3 | $ | 139.5 | $ | 376.9 | $ | (1,167.3 | ) | $ | 4,524.1 | |||||||||||
LIABILITIES |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Current Liabilities: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Short-Term Debt and Current Portion of Long-Term
Debt |
$ | | $ | 18.9 | $ | | $ | 8.0 | $ | | $ | 26.9 | ||||||||||||
Accounts Payable |
| 270.0 | 48.3 | 40.7 | | 359.0 | ||||||||||||||||||
Interest Payable |
| 41.3 | | | | 41.3 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other Accrued Liabilities |
| 142.2 | 7.8 | 15.4 | | 165.4 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total Current Liabilities |
| 472.4 | 56.1 | 64.1 | | 592.6 | ||||||||||||||||||
Long-Term Debt |
| 2,552.3 | | 0.8 | | 2,553.1 | ||||||||||||||||||
Deferred Income Tax Liabilities |
| 240.5 | | 3.7 | | 244.2 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other Noncurrent Liabilities |
| 337.4 | | 5.1 | | 342.5 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total Liabilities |
| 3,602.6 | 56.1 | 73.7 | | 3,732.4 | ||||||||||||||||||
SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Shareholders Equity |
791.7 | 780.7 | 83.4 | 303.2 | (1,167.3 | ) | 791.7 | |||||||||||||||||
Total Liabilities and Shareholders Equity |
$ | 791.7 | $ | 4,383.3 | $ | 139.5 | $ | 376.9 | $ | (1,167.3 | ) | $ | 4,524.1 | |||||||||||
18
Table of Contents
December 31, 2010 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Combined | Combined | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Subsidiary | Guarantor | Nonguarantor | Consolidating | |||||||||||||||||||||
In millions | Parent | Issuer | Subsidiaries | Subsidiaries | Eliminations | Consolidated | ||||||||||||||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Current Assets: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash and Cash Equivalents |
$ | | $ | 107.1 | $ | | $ | 31.6 | $ | | $ | 138.7 | ||||||||||||
Receivables, Net |
| 266.1 | 46.0 | 70.1 | | 382.2 | ||||||||||||||||||
Inventories, Net |
| 315.8 | 55.2 | 46.3 | | 417.3 | ||||||||||||||||||
Deferred Income Tax Assets |
| 27.4 | | 0.6 | | 28.0 | ||||||||||||||||||
Intercompany |
8.8 | 144.0 | (103.3 | ) | (49.5 | ) | | | ||||||||||||||||
Other Current Assets |
| 42.0 | 1.0 | 4.4 | | 47.4 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total Current Assets |
8.8 | 902.4 | (1.1 | ) | 103.5 | | 1,013.6 | |||||||||||||||||
Property, Plant and Equipment, Net |
| 1,460.0 | 119.5 | 62.2 | (0.2 | ) | 1,641.5 | |||||||||||||||||
Investment in Consolidated Subsidiaries |
738.2 | 220.8 | 0.8 | 129.6 | (1,089.4 | ) | | |||||||||||||||||
Goodwill |
| 1,170.7 | | 34.5 | | 1,205.2 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other Assets |
| 600.2 | 0.2 | 23.9 | | 624.3 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total Assets |
$ | 747.0 | $ | 4,354.1 | $ | 119.4 | $ | 353.7 | $ | (1,089.6 | ) | $ | 4,484.6 | |||||||||||
LIABILITIES |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Current Liabilities: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Short-Term Debt and Current Portion of Long-Term
Debt |
$ | | $ | 18.9 | $ | | $ | 7.1 | $ | | $ | 26.0 | ||||||||||||
Accounts Payable |
| 281.6 | 38.0 | 41.9 | | 361.5 | ||||||||||||||||||
Interest Payable |
| 28.4 | | | | 28.4 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other Accrued Liabilities |
| 157.4 | 8.7 | 13.7 | | 179.8 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total Current Liabilities |
| 486.3 | 46.7 | 62.7 | | 595.7 | ||||||||||||||||||
Long-Term Debt |
| 2,552.2 | | 0.9 | | 2,553.1 | ||||||||||||||||||
Deferred Income Tax Liabilities |
| 237.1 | | 4.0 | | 241.1 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other Noncurrent Liabilities |
| 340.3 | | 7.4 | | 347.7 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total Liabilities |
| 3,615.9 | 46.7 | 75.0 | | 3,737.6 | ||||||||||||||||||
SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Shareholders Equity |
747.0 | 738.2 | 72.7 | 278.7 | (1,089.6 | ) | 747.0 | |||||||||||||||||
Total Liabilities and Shareholders Equity |
$ | 747.0 | $ | 4,354.1 | $ | 119.4 | $ | 353.7 | $ | (1,089.6 | ) | $ | 4,484.6 | |||||||||||
19
Table of Contents
Three Months Ended March 31, 2011 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Combined | Combined | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Subsidiary | Guarantor | Nonguarantor | Consolidating | |||||||||||||||||||||
In millions | Parent | Issuer | Subsidiaries | Subsidiaries | Eliminations | Consolidated | ||||||||||||||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Income (Loss) |
$ | 26.7 | $ | 26.7 | $ | 8.3 | $ | 1.9 | $ | (36.9 | ) | $ | 26.7 | |||||||||||
Non-cash Items Included in Net Income (Loss): |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Depreciation and Amortization |
| 64.0 | 4.4 | 2.6 | | 71.0 | ||||||||||||||||||
Deferred Income Taxes |
| 5.6 | (2.8 | ) | | | 2.8 | |||||||||||||||||
Amount of Postretirement Expense Less
Than Funding |
| (2.2 | ) | | (0.8 | ) | | (3.0 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Equity in Net Earnings of Subsidiaries |
(26.7 | ) | (10.6 | ) | 0.4 | | 36.9 | | ||||||||||||||||
Other, Net |
| 6.6 | | 1.1 | | 7.7 | ||||||||||||||||||
Changes in Operating Assets and Liabilities |
| (88.6 | ) | (9.4 | ) | (1.1 | ) | | (99.1 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities |
| 1.5 | 0.9 | 3.7 | | 6.1 | ||||||||||||||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Capital Spending |
| (33.4 | ) | (0.9 | ) | (2.5 | ) | | (36.8 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Other, Net |
| (0.8 | ) | | | | (0.8 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Net Cash Used in Investing Activities |
| (34.2 | ) | (0.9 | ) | (2.5 | ) | | (37.6 | ) | ||||||||||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Borrowings under Revolving Credit Facilities |
| | | 11.2 | | 11.2 | ||||||||||||||||||
Payments on Revolving Credit Facilities |
| | | (10.6 | ) | | (10.6 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Other, Net |
| 0.1 | | | | 0.1 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net Cash Provided by Financing Activities |
| 0.1 | | 0.6 | | 0.7 | ||||||||||||||||||
Effect of Exchange Rate Changes on Cash |
| | | 1.2 | | 1.2 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net (Decrease) Increase in Cash and Cash
Equivalents |
| (32.6 | ) | | 3.0 | | (29.6 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Period |
| 107.1 | | 31.6 | | 138.7 | ||||||||||||||||||
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF PERIOD |
$ | | $ | 74.5 | $ | | $ | 34.6 | $ | | $ | 109.1 | ||||||||||||
20
Table of Contents
Three Months Ended March 31, 2010 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Combined | Combined | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Subsidiary | Guarantor | Nonguarantor | Consolidating | |||||||||||||||||||||
In millions | Parent | Issuer | Subsidiaries | Subsidiaries | Eliminations | Consolidated | ||||||||||||||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Income (Loss) |
$ | 6.3 | $ | 6.3 | $ | 10.4 | $ | (1.8 | ) | $ | (14.9 | ) | $ | 6.3 | ||||||||||
Non-cash Items Included in Net Income (Loss): |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Depreciation and Amortization |
| 67.9 | 4.1 | 2.3 | | 74.3 | ||||||||||||||||||
Deferred Income Taxes |
| 7.9 | | | | 7.9 | ||||||||||||||||||
Amount of Postretirement Expense Less
Than Funding |
| (0.8 | ) | | (0.6 | ) | | (1.4 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Equity in Net Earnings of Subsidiaries |
(6.3 | ) | (7.3 | ) | (1.3 | ) | | 14.9 | | |||||||||||||||
Other, Net |
| 7.0 | | | | 7.0 | ||||||||||||||||||
Changes in Operating Assets and Liabilities |
| (102.9 | ) | (13.2 | ) | (3.2 | ) | | (119.3 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Net Cash Used in Operating Activities |
| (21.9 | ) | | (3.3 | ) | | (25.2 | ) | |||||||||||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Capital Spending |
| (17.0 | ) | | (1.2 | ) | | (18.2 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Other, Net |
| (1.1 | ) | | | | (1.1 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Net Cash Used in Investing Activities |
| (18.1 | ) | | (1.2 | ) | | (19.3 | ) | |||||||||||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Borrowings under Revolving Credit Facilities |
| 82.3 | | 13.7 | | 96.0 | ||||||||||||||||||
Payments on Revolving Credit Facilities |
| (82.7 | ) | | (13.1 | ) | | (95.8 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Net Cash (Used in) Provided by Financing
Activities |
| (0.4 | ) | | 0.6 | | 0.2 | |||||||||||||||||
Effect of Exchange Rate Changes on Cash |
| | | 0.1 | | 0.1 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net Decrease in Cash and Cash Equivalents |
| (40.4 | ) | | (3.8 | ) | | (44.2 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Period |
| 124.3 | | 25.5 | | 149.8 | ||||||||||||||||||
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF PERIOD |
$ | | $ | 83.9 | $ | | $ | 21.7 | $ | | $ | 105.6 | ||||||||||||
21
Table of Contents
NOTE
13 SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
On April 2, 2011, the Company entered into a definitive agreement to acquire substantially all of
the assets and business of Sierra Pacific Packaging, Inc., a producer of folding cartons, beverage
carriers and corrugated boxes for the consumer packaged goods industry for approximately $53.5
million. Completion of the transaction is expected to occur during the second quarter of 2011.
On April 20, 2011, the Company closed the 47.0 million share public offering of its common stock
that was priced at $4.75 per share, representing net proceeds of approximately $213.2 million after
deducting the underwriting discounts. The Company will use a portion of the net proceeds from the
offering to repurchase 6.5 million shares of common stock held by the Grover C. Coors Trust.
Additionally, the Company intends to use approximately $53.5 million of the proceeds from the
offering to acquire substantially all of the assets of Sierra Pacific Packaging, Inc. The Company
will use any remaining net proceeds to reduce its indebtedness and for general corporate purposes.
Had the public offering of common stock and repurchase of common shares held by the Grover C. Coors
Trust occurred during the first quarter of 2011, the number of common shares outstanding as of
March 31, 2011 would have increased from 343.7 million shares to 384.2 million shares.
22
Table of Contents
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
INTRODUCTION
This managements discussion and analysis of financial conditions and results of operations is
intended to provide investors with an understanding of Graphic Packaging Holding Companys (GPHC
and, together with its subsidiaries, the Company) past performance, its financial condition and
its prospects. The following will be discussed and analyzed:
|
Overview of Business |
|
|
Overview of 2011 Results |
|
|
Results of Operations |
|
|
Financial Condition, Liquidity and Capital Resources |
|
|
Critical Accounting Policies |
|
|
New Accounting Standards |
|
|
Business Outlook |
OVERVIEW OF BUSINESS
The Companys objective is to strengthen its position as a leading provider of packaging solutions.
To achieve this objective, the Company offers customers its paperboard, cartons and packaging
machines, either as an integrated solution or separately. Cartons and carriers are designed to
protect and contain products. Product offerings include a variety of laminated, coated and printed
packaging structures that are produced from the Companys CUK, CRB, and URB, as well as other
grades of paperboard that are purchased from third party suppliers. Innovative designs and
combinations of paperboard, films, foils, metallization, holographics and embossing are customized
to the individual needs of the customers.
The Company is a leading supplier of flexible packaging in North America. Products include
multi-wall bags, shingle wrap, plastic bags and film for building materials (such as ready-mix
concrete), retort pouches (such as meals ready to go), medical test kits, batch inclusion bags and
film. Key end-markets include food and agriculture, building and industrial materials, chemicals,
minerals, pet foods, and pharmaceutical products. The Companys label business focuses on two
product lines: heat transfer labels and lithographic labels.
The Company is implementing strategies (i) to expand market share in its current markets and to
identify and penetrate new markets; (ii) to capitalize on the Companys customer relationships,
business competencies, and mills and converting assets; (iii) to develop and market innovative,
sustainable products and applications; and (iv) to continue to reduce costs by focusing on
operational improvements. The Companys ability to fully implement its strategies and achieve its
objective may be influenced by a variety of factors, many of which are beyond its control, such as
inflation of raw material and other costs, which the Company cannot always pass through to its
customers, and the effect of overcapacity in the worldwide paperboard packaging industry.
Significant Factors That Impact The Companys Business
Impact of Inflation. The Companys cost of sales consists primarily of energy (including natural
gas, fuel oil and electricity), pine pulpwood, chemicals, recycled fibers, purchased paperboard,
paper, aluminum foil, ink, plastic films and resins, depreciation expense and labor. Inflation
increased costs in the first three months of 2011 by $35.5 million, compared to the first three
months of 2010. The higher costs in 2011 are primarily related to externally purchased board ($8.9
million), chemical-based inputs ($11.0 million); external paper ($5.8 million); secondary fiber
($5.0 million); labor and related benefits ($4.9 million); freight ($4.8 million) and other costs
($1.0 million). These higher costs were partially offset by lower wood ($3.2 million) and energy
costs ($2.7 million), mainly due to the price of natural gas.
23
Table of Contents
As the price of natural gas has experienced variability, the Company has entered into contracts
designed to manage risks associated with future variability in cash flows caused by changes in the
price of natural gas. The Company has entered into natural gas swap contracts to hedge prices for a
portion of its expected natural gas usage for the remainder of 2011. Since negotiated sales
contracts and the market largely determine the pricing for its products, the Company is at times
limited in its ability to raise prices and pass through to its customers any inflationary or other
cost increases that the Company may incur.
Substantial Debt Obligations. The Company has $2,580.0 million of outstanding debt obligations as
of March 31, 2011. This debt can have significant consequences for the Company, as it requires a
significant portion of cash flow from operations to be used for the payment of principal and
interest, exposes the Company to the risk of increased interest rates and restricts the Companys
ability to obtain additional financing. Covenants in the Companys Credit Agreement dated May 15,
2007, as amended (the Credit Agreement) and the indentures governing its 9.5% Senior Notes due
2017, the 9.5% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2013, and the 7.875% Senior Notes due 2018 (the
Indentures) also prohibit or restrict, among other things, the disposal of assets, the incurrence
of additional indebtedness (including guarantees), payment of dividends, loans or advances and
certain other types of transactions. These restrictions could limit the Companys flexibility to
respond to changing market conditions and competitive pressures. The Credit Agreement also requires
compliance with a maximum consolidated secured leverage ratio. The Companys ability to comply in
future periods with the financial covenant will depend on its ongoing financial and operating
performance, which in turn will be subject to many other factors, many of which are beyond the
Companys control. See Financial Condition, Liquidity and Capital Resources Liquidity and
Capital Resources for additional information regarding the Companys debt obligations.
The substantial debt and the restrictions under the Credit Agreement and the Indentures could limit
the Companys flexibility to respond to changing market conditions and competitive pressures. The
material outstanding debt obligations and the restrictions may also leave the Company more
vulnerable to a downturn in general economic conditions or its business, or unable to carry out
capital expenditures that are necessary or important to its growth strategy and productivity
improvement programs.
Commitment to Cost Reduction. In light of increasing margin pressure throughout the packaging
industry, the Company has programs in place that are designed to reduce costs, improve productivity
and increase profitability. The Company utilizes a global continuous improvement initiative that
uses statistical process control to help design and manage many types of activities, including
production and maintenance. This includes a Six Sigma process focused on reducing variable and
fixed manufacturing and administrative costs. The Company expanded the continuous improvement
initiative to include the deployment of Lean Sigma principles into manufacturing and supply chain
services. As the Company strengthens the systems approach to continuous improvement, Lean Sigma
supports the efforts to build a high performing culture. During the first three months of 2011, the
Company achieved $22.2 million in cost savings as compared to the first three months of 2010,
through its continuous improvement programs and manufacturing initiatives.
The Companys ability to continue to successfully implement its business strategies and to realize
anticipated savings and operating efficiencies is subject to significant business, economic and
competitive uncertainties and contingencies, many of which are beyond the Companys control. If the
Company cannot successfully implement the strategic cost reductions or other cost savings plans it
may not be able to continue to compete successfully against other manufacturers. In addition, any
failure to generate the anticipated efficiencies and savings could adversely affect the Companys
financial results.
Competition and Market Factors. As some products can be packaged in different types of materials,
the Companys sales are affected by competition from other manufacturers CUK board and other
substrates such as solid bleached sulfate and recycled clay-coated news. Substitute products also
include plastic, shrink film and corrugated containers. In addition, while the Company has
long-term relationships with many of its customers, the underlying contracts may be re-bid or
renegotiated from time to time, and the Company may not be successful in renewing on favorable
terms or at all. The Company works to maintain market share through efficiency, product innovation
and strategic sourcing to its customers; however, pricing and other competitive pressures may
occasionally result in the loss of a customer relationship.
In addition, the Companys sales historically are driven by consumer buying habits in the markets
its customers serve. Increases in the costs of living, the poor condition of the residential real
estate market, high unemployment rates, reduced access to credit markets, as well as other
macroeconomic factors, may significantly negatively affect consumer spending behavior, which could
have a material
24
Table of Contents
adverse effect on demand for the Companys products. New product introductions and promotional
activity by the Companys customers and the Companys introduction of new packaging products also
impact its sales. The Companys containerboard business is subject to conditions in the cyclical
worldwide commodity paperboard markets, which have a significant impact on containerboard sales.
OVERVIEW OF 2011 RESULTS
This managements discussion and analysis contains an analysis of Net Sales, Income from Operations
and other information relevant to an understanding of results of operations.
| Net Sales in the first three months of 2011 decreased by $3.5 million, or 0.3%, to $1,000.6
million from $1,004.1 million in the first three months of 2010 primarily due to lower volume
in both the paperboard packaging and flexible packaging segments. These decreases were
partially offset by pricing improvement across all segments as well as favorable currency
exchange rates, primarily in Japan and Australia. |
| Income from Operations in the first three months of 2011 increased by $9.0 million, or 15.1%,
to $68.6 million from $59.6 million in the first three months of 2010. This increase was
primarily due to lower restructuring charges of $8.5 million, the higher pricing, and improved
performance due to cost savings, partially offset by the higher inflation and the lower
volume. |
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Segment Information
The Company reports its results in two business segments: paperboard packaging and flexible
packaging.
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||
In millions | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||
NET SALES: |
||||||||
Paperboard Packaging |
$ | 825.0 | $ | 834.6 | ||||
Flexible Packaging |
175.6 | 169.5 | ||||||
Total |
$ | 1,000.6 | $ | 1,004.1 | ||||
INCOME (LOSS) FROM OPERATIONS: |
||||||||
Paperboard Packaging |
$ | 74.4 | $ | 75.7 | ||||
Flexible Packaging |
6.0 | 6.7 | ||||||
Corporate |
(11.8 | ) | (22.8 | ) | ||||
Total |
$ | 68.6 | $ | 59.6 | ||||
FIRST QUARTER 2011 COMPARED WITH FIRST QUARTER 2010
Net Sales
Three Months Ended March 31, | ||||||||||||||||
Increase / | Percent | |||||||||||||||
In millions | 2011 | 2010 | (Decrease) | Change | ||||||||||||
Paperboard Packaging |
$ | 825.0 | $ | 834.6 | $ | (9.6 | ) | (1.2 | %) | |||||||
Flexible Packaging |
175.6 | 169.5 | 6.1 | 3.6 | % | |||||||||||
Total |
$ | 1,000.6 | $ | 1,004.1 | $ | (3.5 | ) | (0.3 | %) | |||||||
25
Table of Contents
The components of the change in Net Sales by segment are as follows:
Three Months Ended March 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Variances | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
In millions | 2010 | Price | Volume/Mix | Exchange | Total | 2011 | ||||||||||||||||||
Paperboard Packaging |
$ | 834.6 | $ | 14.9 | $ | (28.2 | ) | $ | 3.7 | $ | (9.6 | ) | $ | 825.0 | ||||||||||
Flexible Packaging |
169.5 | 9.1 | (3.7 | ) | 0.7 | 6.1 | 175.6 | |||||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 1,004.1 | $ | 24.0 | $ | (31.9 | ) | $ | 4.4 | $ | (3.5 | ) | $ | 1,000.6 | ||||||||||
Paperboard Packaging
The Companys Net Sales from paperboard packaging in the first three months of 2011 decreased by
$9.6 million, or 1.2%, to $825.0 million from $834.6 million in 2010 as a result of lower volume
for consumer and beverage products, containerboard and open market CRB. The decrease in volume was
partially offset by higher pricing for open market and consumer products sales, which was primarily
due to inflationary cost pass throughs. The lower volume for consumer products was due to the
continuing impact of general market conditions in which volume was down primarily in cereal and dry
foods. Additionally, the storms in the Midwestern United States in February interrupted shipments,
resulting in lost sales for consumer products. The decrease in beverage volume was due to the
continued decline of the soft drink market due to higher consumer pricing and delayed promotional
activity, and lower beer volume due to overall declines. Favorable currency exchange rate changes,
primarily in Japan and Australia, also positively impacted Net Sales.
Flexible Packaging
The Companys Net Sales from flexible packaging in the first three months of 2011 increased by $6.1
million, or 3.6%, to $175.6 million from $169.5 million as a result of higher pricing primarily due
to negotiated inflationary pass throughs, and favorable currency exchange rates in Canada. These
increases were partially offset by lower volume as a result of the market conditions where
construction and industrial sectors remained weak.
Income (Loss) from Operations
Three Months Ended March 31, | ||||||||||||||||
Increase | Percent | |||||||||||||||
In millions | 2011 | 2010 | (Decrease) | Change | ||||||||||||
Paperboard Packaging |
$ | 74.4 | $ | 75.7 | $ | (1.3 | ) | (1.7 | %) | |||||||
Flexible Packaging |
6.0 | 6.7 | (0.7 | ) | (10.4 | %) | ||||||||||
Corporate |
(11.8 | ) | (22.8 | ) | 11.0 | N.M. | (a) | |||||||||
Total |
$ | 68.6 | $ | 59.6 | $ | 9.0 | 15.1 | % | ||||||||
Note:
(a) | Percentage calculation not meaningful. |
The components of the change in Income (Loss) from Operations by segment are as follows:
Three Months Ended March 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Variances | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
In millions | 2010 | Price | Volume/Mix | Inflation | Exchange | Other(a) | Total | 2011 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Paperboard Packaging |
$ | 75.7 | $ | 14.9 | $ | (4.2 | ) | $ | (24.1 | ) | $ | 1.6 | $ | 10.5 | $ | (1.3 | ) | $ | 74.4 | |||||||||||||
Flexible Packaging |
6.7 | 9.1 | (1.4 | ) | (11.4 | ) | 0.1 | 2.9 | (0.7 | ) | 6.0 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Corporate |
(22.8 | ) | | | | 2.1 | 8.9 | 11.0 | (11.8 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 59.6 | $ | 24.0 | $ | (5.6 | ) | $ | (35.5 | ) | $ | 3.8 | $ | 22.3 | $ | 9.0 | $ | 68.6 | ||||||||||||||
Note:
(a) | Includes the Companys cost reduction initiatives. |
26
Table of Contents
Paperboard Packaging
The Companys Income from Operations from paperboard packaging in the first three months of 2011
decreased by $1.3 million, or 1.7%, to $74.4 million from $75.7 million in 2010 as a result of
inflation, the lower volume, and higher incentive compensation cost. These decreases were partially
offset by higher pricing and cost savings through continuous improvement programs and manufacturing
initiatives. The inflation was primarily related to externally purchased board ($8.9 million);
higher chemical-based inputs ($7.9 million); secondary fiber ($5.0 million); freight ($4.3
million); labor and related benefits ($3.7 million); and other costs ($0.2 million). These higher
costs were partially offset by lower wood costs ($3.2 million) and energy costs ($2.7 million),
mainly due to the price of natural gas.
Flexible Packaging
The Companys Income from Operations from flexible packaging in the first three months of 2011
decreased by $0.7 million, or 10.4%, to $6.0 million from $6.7 million in 2010 as a result of the
inflation primarily due to external paper ($5.8 million), resin ($2.9 million), labor and related
benefits ($1.3 million) and other costs ($1.4 million), as well as higher incentive compensation
cost. The higher inflation was partially offset by the higher pricing and cost savings.
Corporate
The Companys Loss from Operations from corporate in the first three months of 2011 was $11.8
million compared to $22.8 million for the same period in 2010. The change was primarily due to
lower restructuring expenses of $8.5 million due to the finalization of merger related activities
last year and the favorable impact of foreign exchange rates.
INTEREST EXPENSE AND INCOME TAX EXPENSE
Interest Expense, Net
Interest Expense, Net was $39.3 million and $45.0 million in the first three months of 2011 and
2010, respectively. Interest Expense, Net decreased due to lower debt levels and lower average
rates of the Companys debt. As of March 31, 2011, approximately 22.7% of the Companys total debt
was subject to floating interest rates. Interest rate swaps with notional amounts totaling $330
million expired during April 2011. After the expiration of these swaps approximately 35.5% of the
Companys total debt was subject to floating interest rates, which are currently lower than the
fixed rates under the expiring interest rate swaps.
Income Tax Expense
During the first three months of 2011, the Company recognized Income Tax Expense of $2.9 million on
Income before Income Taxes and Equity Income of Unconsolidated Entities of $29.3 million. During
the first three months of 2010, the Company recognized Income Tax Expense of $8.6 million on Income
before Income Taxes and Equity Income of Unconsolidated Entities of $14.6 million. Income Tax
Expense for the first three months of 2011 and 2010 primarily relates to the non-cash expense of
$5.6 million and $7.9 million, respectively, associated with the amortization of goodwill for tax
purposes. The reduction was due to a portion of goodwill being fully amortized at the end of 2010.
The Company also recorded a benefit related to certain discrete events including the revision of
state tax positions and the expiration of the statute of limitation associated with reserves in a
foreign jurisdiction. The Company has approximately $1.3 billion of NOLs for U.S. federal income
tax purposes, which may be used to offset future taxable income.
FINANCIAL CONDITION, LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
The Company broadly defines liquidity as its ability to generate sufficient funds from both
internal and external sources to meet its obligations and commitments. In addition, liquidity
includes the ability to obtain appropriate debt and equity financing and to convert into cash those
assets that are no longer required to meet existing strategic and financial objectives. Therefore,
liquidity cannot be considered separately from capital resources that consist of current or
potentially available funds for use in achieving long-range business objectives and meeting debt
service commitments.
27
Table of Contents
Cash Flows
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||
In millions | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||
Net Cash (Used in) Provided by Operating Activities |
$ | 6.1 | $ | (25.2 | ) | |||
Net Cash Used in Investing Activities |
(37.6 | ) | (19.3 | ) | ||||
Net Cash Provided by Financing Activities |
0.7 | 0.2 |
Net cash provided by operating activities in the first three months of 2011 totaled $6.1 million,
compared to net cash used in operating activities of $25.2 million in 2010. The increase was
primarily due to higher net income and lower working capital requirements, primarily as a result of
higher accounts payable and lower receivables and the timing of interest payments, partially offset
by higher inventory due to upcoming customer promotions and the lower volume.
Net cash used in investing activities in the first three months of 2011 totaled $37.6 million,
compared to $19.3 million in 2010. This year over year change was due primarily to an increase in
capital spending of $18.6 million as a result of managements decision to invest in capital
projects to improve process capabilities and reduce cost including the previously announced biomass
boiler project in Macon, Ga.
Net cash provided by financing activities in the first three months of 2011 totaled $0.7 million
compared to $0.2 million in 2010. This increase was primarily due to higher net borrowings under
the Companys international revolving credit facilities.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
The Companys liquidity needs arise primarily from debt service on its substantial indebtedness and
from the funding of its capital expenditures, ongoing operating costs and working capital.
Principal and interest payments under the term loan facility and the revolving credit facility,
together with principal and interest payments on the Companys 9.5% Senior Notes due 2017, the 9.5%
Senior Subordinated Notes due 2013, and the 7.875% Senior Notes due 2018 (Notes), represent
significant liquidity requirements for the Company. Based upon current levels of operations,
anticipated cost savings and expectations as to future growth, the Company believes that cash
generated from operations, together with amounts available under its revolving credit facility and
other available financing sources, will be adequate to permit the Company to meet its debt service
obligations, necessary capital expenditure program requirements and ongoing operating costs and
working capital needs, although no assurance can be given in this regard. The Companys future
financial and operating performance, ability to service or refinance its debt and ability to comply
with the covenants and restrictions contained in its debt agreements (see Covenant Restrictions)
will be subject to future economic conditions, including conditions in the credit markets, and to
financial, business and other factors, many of which are beyond the Companys control, and will be
substantially dependent on the selling prices and demand for the Companys products, raw material
and energy costs, and the Companys ability to successfully implement its overall business and
profitability strategies.
Covenant Restrictions
The Credit Agreement and the Indentures limit the Companys ability to incur additional
indebtedness. Additional covenants contained in the Credit Agreement and the Indentures, among
other things, restrict the ability of the Company to dispose of assets, incur guarantee
obligations, prepay other indebtedness, make dividends and other restricted payments, create liens,
make equity or debt investments, make acquisitions, modify terms of the indentures under which the
Notes are issued, engage in mergers or consolidations, change the business conducted by the Company
and its subsidiaries, and engage in certain transactions with affiliates. Such restrictions,
together with the highly leveraged nature of the Company and disruptions in the credit markets,
could limit the Companys ability to respond to changing market conditions, fund its capital
spending program, provide for unexpected capital investments or take advantage of business
opportunities.
Under the terms of the Credit Agreement, the Company must comply with a maximum consolidated
secured leverage ratio, which is defined as the ratio of: (a) total long-term and short-term
indebtedness of the Company and its consolidated subsidiaries as determined in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (U.S. GAAP), plus the aggregate
cash proceeds received by the Company and its subsidiaries from any receivables or other
securitization but excluding therefrom (i) all unsecured indebtedness, (ii) all subordinated
indebtedness permitted to be incurred under the Credit Agreement, and (iii) all secured
indebtedness of foreign subsidiaries to (b) Adjusted EBITDA, which we refer to as Credit Agreement
EBITDA(1). Pursuant to this financial
covenant, the Company must maintain a maximum consolidated secured leverage ratio of less than the
following:
28
Table of Contents
Maximum Consolidated Secured | ||||
Leverage Ratio(1) | ||||
October 1, 2009 and thereafter |
4.75 to 1.00 | |||
Note:
(1) | Credit Agreement EBITDA is defined in the Credit Agreement as consolidated net income
before consolidated net interest expense, non-cash expenses and charges, total income tax
expense, depreciation expense, expense associated with amortization of intangibles and other
assets, non-cash provisions for reserves for discontinued operations, extraordinary, unusual
or non-recurring gains or losses or charges or credits, gain or loss associated with sale or
write-down of assets not in the ordinary course of business, any income or loss accounted
for by the equity method of accounting, and projected run rate cost savings, prior to or
within a twelve month period. |
At March 31, 2011, the Company was in compliance with the financial covenant in the Credit
Agreement and the ratio was as follows:
Consolidated Secured Leverage Ratio 2.74 to 1.00
The Companys management believes that presentation of the consolidated secured leverage ratio and
Credit Agreement EBITDA herein provides useful information to investors because borrowings under
the Credit Agreement are a key source of the Companys liquidity, and the Companys ability to
borrow under the Credit Agreement is dependent on, among other things, its compliance with the
financial ratio covenant. Any failure by the Company to comply with this financial covenant could
result in an event of default, absent a waiver or amendment from the lenders under such agreement,
in which case the lenders may be entitled to declare all amounts owed to be due and payable
immediately.
Credit Agreement EBITDA is a financial measure not calculated in accordance with U.S. GAAP, and is
not a measure of net income, operating income, operating performance or liquidity presented in
accordance with U.S. GAAP. Credit Agreement EBITDA should be considered in addition to results
prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP, but should not be considered a substitute for, or superior
to, U.S. GAAP results. In addition, Credit Agreement EBITDA may not be comparable to EBITDA or
similarly titled measures utilized by other companies because other companies may not calculate
Credit Agreement EBITDA in the same manner as the Company does.
The calculations of the components of the maximum consolidated secured leverage ratio for and as of
the period ended March 31, 2011 are listed below:
Twelve Months Ended | ||||
In millions | March 31, 2011 | |||
Net Income |
$ | 31.1 | ||
Income Tax Expense |
21.8 | |||
Interest Expense, Net |
168.8 | |||
Depreciation and Amortization |
285.4 | |||
Equity Income of Unconsolidated Entities, Net of Dividends |
(0.2 | ) | ||
Other Non-Cash Charges |
40.0 | |||
Merger Related Expenses |
46.6 | |||
Losses Associated with Sale/Write-Down of Assets |
5.6 | |||
Other Non-Recurring/Extraordinary/Unusual Items |
8.4 | |||
Projected Run Rate Cost Savings (a) |
60.8 | |||
Credit Agreement EBITDA |
$ | 668.3 | ||
29
Table of Contents
As of | ||||
In millions | March 31, 2011 | |||
Short-Term Debt |
$ | 26.9 | ||
Long-Term Debt |
2,553.1 | |||
Total Debt |
$ | 2,580.0 | ||
Less: Adjustments (b) |
752.3 | |||
Consolidated Secured Indebtedness |
$ | 1,827.7 | ||
Notes:
(a) | As defined by the Credit Agreement, this represents projected cost savings expected by
the Company to be realized as a result of specific actions taken or expected to be taken
prior to or within twelve months of the period in which Credit Agreement EBITDA is to be
calculated, net of the amount of actual benefits realized or expected to be realized from
such actions. |
The terms of the Credit Agreement limit the amount of projected run rate cost savings that
may be used in calculating Credit Agreement EBITDA by stipulating that such amount may not
exceed the lesser of (i) ten percent of EBITDA as defined in the Credit Agreement for the
last twelve-month period (before giving effect to projected run rate cost savings) and (ii)
$100 million. As a result, in calculating Credit Agreement EBITDA above, the Company used
projected run rate cost savings of $60.8 million or ten percent of EBITDA as calculated in
accordance with the Credit Agreement, which amount is lower than total projected cost savings
identified by the Company, net of actual benefits realized for the twelve month period ended
March 31, 2011. Projected run rate cost savings were calculated by the Company solely for its
use in calculating Credit Agreement EBITDA for purposes of determining compliance with the
maximum consolidated secured leverage ratio contained in the Credit Agreement and should not
be used for any other purpose. |
(b) | Represents consolidated indebtedness/securitization that is either (i) unsecured, or (ii)
all subordinated indebtedness permitted to be incurred under the Credit Agreement, or
secured indebtedness permitted to be incurred by the Companys foreign subsidiaries per the
Credit Agreement. |
If inflationary pressures on key inputs continue, or depressed selling prices, lower sales volumes,
increased operating costs or other factors have a negative impact on the Companys ability to
increase its profitability, the Company may not be able to maintain its compliance with the
financial covenant in its Credit Agreement. The Companys ability to comply in future periods with
the financial covenant in the Credit Agreement will depend on its ongoing financial and operating
performance, which in turn will be subject to economic conditions and to financial, business and
other factors, many of which are beyond the Companys control, and will be substantially dependent
on the selling prices for the Companys products, raw material and energy costs, and the Companys
ability to successfully implement its overall business strategies, and meet its profitability
objective. If a violation of the financial covenant or any of the other covenants occurred, the
Company would attempt to obtain a waiver or an amendment from its lenders, although no assurance
can be given that the Company would be successful in this regard. The Credit Agreement and the
Indentures governing the Notes have certain cross-default or cross-acceleration provisions; failure
to comply with these covenants in any agreement could result in a violation of such agreement which
could, in turn, lead to violations of other agreements pursuant to such cross-default or
cross-acceleration provisions. If an event of default occurs, the lenders are entitled to declare
all amounts owed to be due and payable immediately. The Credit Agreement is collateralized by
substantially all of the Companys domestic assets.
Capital Investment
The Companys capital investment in the first three months of 2011 was $36.8 million compared to
$18.2 million in the first three months of 2010. During the first three months of 2011, the Company
had capital spending of $27.2 million for improving process capabilities, $4.7 million for capital
spares and $4.9 million for manufacturing packaging machinery.
Environmental Matters
Some of the Companys current and former facilities are the subject of environmental investigations
and remediations resulting from historical operations and the release of hazardous substances or
other constituents. Some current and former facilities have a history of industrial usage for which
investigation and remediation obligations may be imposed in the future or for which indemnification
claims may be asserted against the Company. Also, potential future closures or sales of facilities
may necessitate further investigation and
may result in future remediation at those facilities. The Company has established reserves for
those facilities or issues where liability is probable and the costs are reasonably estimable.
30
Table of Contents
For
further discussion of the Companys environmental matters, see Note 9 in Part I, Item 1, Notes
to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make
estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of
the financial statements and the reported amounts of net sales and expenses during the reporting
period. Actual results could differ from these estimates, and changes in these estimates are
recorded when known. The critical accounting policies used by management in the preparation of the
Companys condensed consolidated financial statements are those that are important both to the
presentation of the Companys financial condition and results of operations and require significant
judgments by management with regard to estimates used.
The Companys most critical accounting policies which require significant judgment or involve
complex estimations are described in GPHCs Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December
31, 2010.
NEW ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
For a discussion of recent accounting pronouncements impacting the Company, see Note 1 in Part I,
Item 1, Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
BUSINESS OUTLOOK
The Company expects to realize between $70 million and $90 million of year over year operating cost
savings from its continuous improvement programs, including Lean Sigma manufacturing projects.
Total capital investment for 2011 is expected to be between $170 million and $190 million and is
expected to relate principally to the Companys process capability improvements (approximately $146
million), acquiring capital spares (approximately $20 million), and producing packaging machinery
(approximately $14 million).
The Company also expects the following in 2011:
| Depreciation and
amortization in the $285 million range. |
||
| Interest expense of $145 million to $155 million, including $9 million of non-cash interest
expense associated with amortization of debt issuance costs. |
||
| Net debt reduction from
operations in the $200 million to $220 million range in
addition to the use of the proceeds from the equity offering. |
||
| Pension plan contributions of $45 million to $70 million. |
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURE ABOUT MARKET RISK
For a discussion of certain market risks related to the Company, see Part II, Item 7A,
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure about Market Risk, in GPHCs Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2010. There have been no significant developments with respect to
derivatives or exposure to market risk during the first three months of 2011. For a discussion of
the Companys Financial Instruments, Derivatives and Hedging Activities, see GPHCs Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 and Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations Financial Condition, Liquidity and Capital
Resources.
31
Table of Contents
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
The Companys management has carried out an evaluation, with the participation of its Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the Companys disclosure
controls and procedures pursuant to Rule 13a-15 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Based upon such evaluation, management has concluded that the Companys disclosure controls and
procedures were effective as of March 31, 2011.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There was no change in the Companys internal control over financial reporting that occurred during
the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2011 that has materially affected, or is likely to materially
affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
The Company is a party to a number of lawsuits arising in the ordinary conduct of its business.
Although the timing and outcome of these lawsuits cannot be predicted with certainty, the Company
does not believe that disposition of these lawsuits will have a material adverse effect on the
Companys consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows. For more
information see Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations Environmental Matters.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
There have been no material changes from the risk factors previously disclosed in GPHCs Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.
32
Table of Contents
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS
a) | Exhibit Index |
Exhibit Number | Description | |
4.1
|
Second Amendment to Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of March 7, 2011, by and among Graphic Packaging Holding Company, Clayton Dubilier & Rice Fund V Limited Partnership, Old Town S.A., Jeffrey H. Coors, TPG Bluegrass IV-AIV 1, L.P., TPG Bluegrass IV-AIV 2, L.P., TPG Bluegrass V-AIV 1, L.P., TPG Bluegrass V-AIV 2, L.P., TPG FOF V-A, L.P. and TPG FOF V-B, L.P. | |
10.1
|
Form of 2011 Perfomance-Based Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement | |
10.2
|
Form of 2011 Service-Based Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement | |
31.1
|
Certification required by Rule 13a-14(a). | |
31.2
|
Certification required by Rule 13a-14(a). | |
32.1
|
Certification required by Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code. | |
32.2
|
Certification required by Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code. |
33
Table of Contents
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto
duly authorized.
GRAPHIC PACKAGING HOLDING COMPANY
(Registrant)
(Registrant)
/s/ STEPHEN A. HELLRUNG
|
Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary | April 21, 2011 | ||
/s/ DANIEL J. BLOUNT
|
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer) |
April 21, 2011 | ||
/s/ DEBORAH R. FRANK
|
Vice President and Chief Accounting
Officer (Principal Accounting Officer) |
April 21, 2011 |
34