Green Brick Partners, Inc. - Quarter Report: 2009 September (Form 10-Q)
UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON,
D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
x
|
QUARTERLY
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
For
the quarterly period ended September 30, 2009
OR
¨
|
TRANSITION
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
For
the transition period from to
Commission
file number: 001-33530
BIOFUEL
ENERGY CORP.
(Exact
name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware
|
20-5952523
|
|
(State
of incorporation)
|
(I.R.S.
employer identification number)
|
|
1600
Broadway, Suite 2200
|
||
Denver,
Colorado
|
80202
|
|
(Address
of principal executive offices)
|
(Zip
Code)
|
(303)
640-6500
(Registrant’s
telephone number, including area code)
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to
be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
as required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on
its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be
submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of
this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that
the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ¨ No ¨
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated
filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
(Check one):
Large
accelerated filer ¨
|
Accelerated
filer ¨
|
|
Non-accelerated
filer ¨
|
Smaller
reporting company x
|
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No x
Number of
shares of common stock outstanding as of November 12, 2009: 25,884,211
exclusive of 809,606 shares held in treasury.
PART I.
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1.
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The
accompanying interim consolidated financial statements of BioFuel Energy Corp.
(the “Company”) have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America. The statements are
unaudited but reflect all adjustments which, in the opinion of management, are
necessary to fairly present the Company’s financial position and results of
operations. All such adjustments are of a normal recurring nature. The results
of operations for the interim period are not necessarily indicative of the
results for the full year. For further information, refer to the financial
statements and notes presented in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the twelve months ended December 31, 2008 (filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on March 30, 2009).
2
BioFuel
Energy Corp.
Consolidated
Balance Sheets
(in
thousands, except share and per share data)
(Unaudited)
September 30,
|
December 31,
|
|||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
Assets
|
||||||||
Current
assets
|
||||||||
Cash
and equivalents
|
$ | 8,167 | $ | 12,299 | ||||
Accounts
receivable
|
16,163 | 16,669 | ||||||
Inventories
|
13,709 | 14,929 | ||||||
Certificates
of deposit
|
1,882 | — | ||||||
Prepaid
expenses
|
1,413 | 2,153 | ||||||
Restricted
cash
|
— | 612 | ||||||
Other
current assets
|
344 | 203 | ||||||
Total
current assets
|
41,678 | 46,865 | ||||||
Property,
plant and equipment, net
|
289,508 | 305,350 | ||||||
Certificates
of deposit
|
— | 4,015 | ||||||
Debt
issuance costs, net
|
6,833 | 7,917 | ||||||
Restricted
cash
|
— | 1,003 | ||||||
Other
assets
|
2,297 | 574 | ||||||
Total
assets
|
$ | 340,316 | $ | 365,724 | ||||
Liabilities
and stockholders’ equity
|
||||||||
Current
liabilities
|
||||||||
Accounts
payable
|
$ | 7,415 | $ | 11,274 | ||||
Construction
retainage
|
— | 9,407 | ||||||
Current
portion of long-term debt
|
33,647 | 11,588 | ||||||
Current
portion of derivative financial instrument
|
619 | 2,658 | ||||||
Current
portion of tax increment financing
|
309 | 298 | ||||||
Other
current liabilities
|
1,902 | 2,932 | ||||||
Total
current liabilities
|
43,892 | 38,157 | ||||||
Long-term
debt, net of current portion
|
220,785 | 226,351 | ||||||
Tax
increment financing, net of current portion
|
5,729 | 5,887 | ||||||
Derivative
financial instrument, net of current portion
|
— | 83 | ||||||
Other
non-current liabilities
|
1,284 | 487 | ||||||
Total
liabilities
|
271,690 | 270,965 | ||||||
Commitments
and contingencies
|
||||||||
BioFuel
Energy Corp. stockholders’ equity
|
||||||||
Preferred
stock, $0.01 par value; 5.0 million shares authorized and no shares
outstanding at September 30, 2009 and December 31,
2008
|
— | — | ||||||
Common
stock, $0.01 par value; 100.0 million shares authorized and 25,235,497
shares outstanding at September 30, 2009 and 23,318,636 shares
outstanding at December 31, 2008
|
252 | 233 | ||||||
Class B
common stock, $0.01 par value; 50.0 million shares authorized and
8,149,431 shares outstanding at September 30, 2009 and
10,082,248 shares outstanding at
December 31, 2008
|
81 | 101 | ||||||
Less
common stock held in treasury, at cost, 809,606 shares at
September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008
|
(4,316 | ) | (4,316 | ) | ||||
Additional
paid-in capital
|
136,439 | 134,360 | ||||||
Accumulated
other comprehensive loss
|
(355 | ) | (2,741 | ) | ||||
Accumulated
deficit
|
(67,425 | ) | (46,947 | ) | ||||
Total
BioFuel Energy Corp. stockholders’ equity
|
64,676 | 80,690 | ||||||
Noncontrolling
interest
|
3,950 | 14,069 | ||||||
Total
equity
|
68,626 | 94,759 | ||||||
Total
liabilities and stockholders’ equity
|
$ | 340,316 | $ | 365,724 |
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial
statements.
3
BioFuel
Energy Corp.
Consolidated
Statements of Operations
(in
thousands, except per share data)
(Unaudited)
Three Months Ended September 30,
|
Nine Months Ended September 30,
|
|||||||||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||||||||
Net
sales
|
$ | 91,138 | $ | 90,549 | $ | 295,096 | $ | 90,841 | ||||||||
Cost
of goods sold
|
89,039 | 103,765 | 298,911 | 104,021 | ||||||||||||
Gross
income (loss)
|
2,099 | (13,216 | ) | (3,815 | ) | (13,180 | ) | |||||||||
General
and administrative expenses:
|
||||||||||||||||
Compensation
expense
|
1,467 | 1,115 | 4,551 | 6,560 | ||||||||||||
Other
|
4,270 | 1,353 | 8,060 | 8,408 | ||||||||||||
Other
operating expense
|
150 | 1,345 | 150 | 1,345 | ||||||||||||
Operating
loss
|
(3,788 | ) | (17,029 | ) | (16,576 | ) | (29,493 | ) | ||||||||
Other
income (expense):
|
||||||||||||||||
Interest
income
|
13 | 135 | 74 | 987 | ||||||||||||
Interest
expense
|
(4,598 | ) | (1,632 | ) | (12,036 | ) | (1,632 | ) | ||||||||
Other
non-operating expense
|
— | (2,123 | ) | (1 | ) | (1,785 | ) | |||||||||
Loss
on derivative financial instruments
|
— | (49,992 | ) | — | (39,912 | ) | ||||||||||
Loss
before income taxes
|
(8,373 | ) | (70,641 | ) | (28,539 | ) | (71,835 | ) | ||||||||
Income
tax provision (benefit)
|
— | — | — | — | ||||||||||||
Net
loss
|
(8,373 | ) | (70,641 | ) | (28,539 | ) | (71,835 | ) | ||||||||
Less:
Net loss attributable to the noncontrolling interest
|
2,139 | 37,493 | 8,061 | 37,856 | ||||||||||||
Net
loss attributable to BioFuel Energy Corp. common
shareholders
|
$ | (6,234 | ) | $ | (33,148 | ) | $ | (20,478 | ) | $ | (33,979 | ) | ||||
Loss
per share - basic and diluted attributable to BioFuel Energy Corp.
common shareholders
|
$ | (0.26 | ) | $ | (2.18 | ) | $ | (0.87 | ) | $ | (2.23 | ) | ||||
Weighted
average shares outstanding
|
||||||||||||||||
Basic
|
24,397 | 15,210 | 23,418 | 15,250 | ||||||||||||
Diluted
|
24,397 | 15,210 | 23,418 | 15,250 |
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial
statements.
4
BioFuel
Energy Corp.
Consolidated
Statements of Stockholders’ Equity
(in
thousands, except share data)
(Unaudited)
Accumulated
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Class B
|
Additional
|
Other
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Common Stock
|
Common Stock
|
Treasury
|
Paid-in
|
Accumulated
|
Comprehensive
|
Noncontrolling
|
Stockholders’
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares
|
Amount
|
Shares
|
Amount
|
Stock
|
Capital
|
Deficit
|
Loss
|
Interest
|
Equity
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance
at December 31, 2007
|
15,994,124 | $ | 160 | 17,396,686 | $ | 174 | $ | (2,040 | ) | $ | 130,409 | $ | (6,082 | ) | $ | (950 | ) | $ | 68,799 | $ | 190,470 | |||||||||||||||||||
Stock
based compensation
|
— | — | — | — | — | 682 | — | — | — | 682 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Exchange
of Class B shares to common
|
7,314,438 | 73 | (7,314,438 | ) | (73 | ) | — | 3,269 | — | — | (11,468 | ) | (8,199 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance
of restricted stock, (net of forfeitures)
|
10,074 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Purchase
of common stock for treasury
|
— | — | — | — | (2,276 | ) | — | — | — | — | (2,276 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive
loss:
|
— | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Hedging
settlements
|
— | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1,098 | — | 1,098 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Change
in derivative financial instrument fair value
|
— | — | — | — | — | — | — | (2,889 | ) | — | (2,889 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net
loss
|
— | — | — | — | — | — | (40,865 | ) | — | (43,262 | ) | (84,127 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total
comprehensive loss
|
(85,918 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance
at December 31, 2008
|
23,318,636 | 233 | 10,082,248 | 101 | (4,316 | ) | 134,360 | (46,947 | ) | (2,741 | ) | 14,069 | 94,759 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock
based compensation
|
— | — | — | — | — | 284 | — | — | — | 284 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Exchange
of Class B shares to common
|
1,932,817 | 20 | (1,932,817 | ) | (20 | ) | — | 1,794 | — | — | (1,794 | ) | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance
of restricted stock, (net of forfeitures)
|
(15,956 | ) | (1 | ) | — | — | — | 1 | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive
loss:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Hedging
settlements
|
— | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2,065 | 777 | 2,842 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Change
in derivative financial instrument fair value
|
— | — | — | — | — | — | — | 321 | (1,041 | ) | (720 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net
loss
|
— | — | — | — | — | — | (20,478 | ) | — | (8,061 | ) | (28,539 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total
comprehensive loss
|
(26,417 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance
at September 30, 2009
|
25,235,497 | $ | 252 | 8,149,431 | $ | 81 | $ | (4,316 | ) | $ | 136,439 | $ | (67,425 | ) | $ | (355 | ) | $ | 3,950 | $ | 68,626 |
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial
statements.
5
BioFuel
Energy Corp.
Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows
(in
thousands)
(Unaudited)
Nine Months Ended September 30,
|
||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
Cash
flows from operating activities
|
||||||||
Net
loss
|
$ | (28,539 | ) | $ | (71,835 | ) | ||
Adjustments
to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating
activities:
|
||||||||
Stock
based compensation expense
|
284 | 521 | ||||||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
20,988 | 2,562 | ||||||
Loss
on disposal of assets
|
— | 1,095 | ||||||
Changes
in operating assets and liabilities:
|
||||||||
Accounts
receivable
|
506 | (18,727 | ) | |||||
Inventories
|
1,220 | (17,066 | ) | |||||
Prepaid
expenses
|
740 | (1,221 | ) | |||||
Accounts
payable
|
(4,183 | ) | 26,448 | |||||
Other
current liabilities
|
(1,330 | ) | 2,974 | |||||
Other
assets and liabilities
|
(380 | ) | 707 | |||||
Net
cash used in operating activities
|
(10,694 | ) | (74,542 | ) | ||||
Cash
flows from investing activities
|
||||||||
Capital
expenditures (including payment of construction retainage)
|
(12,570 | ) | (41,972 | ) | ||||
Proceeds
from insurance claim
|
300 | — | ||||||
Purchase
of certificates of deposit
|
— | (1,847 | ) | |||||
Redemption
of certificates of deposit
|
2,159 | — | ||||||
Net
cash used in investing activities
|
(10,111 | ) | (43,819 | ) | ||||
Cash
flows from financing activities
|
||||||||
Proceeds
from issuance of debt
|
20,387 | 85,500 | ||||||
Repayment
of debt
|
(4,383 | ) | — | |||||
Withdrawal
from debt service reserve
|
1,615 | — | ||||||
Payment
of notes payable and capital leases
|
(718 | ) | (453 | ) | ||||
Repayment
of tax increment financing
|
(228 | ) | (369 | ) | ||||
Payment
of debt issuance costs
|
— | (387 | ) | |||||
Purchase
of treasury stock
|
— | (2,276 | ) | |||||
Net
cash provided by financing activities
|
16,673 | 82,015 | ||||||
Net
decrease in cash and equivalents
|
(4,132 | ) | (36,346 | ) | ||||
Cash
and equivalents, beginning of period
|
12,299 | 55,987 | ||||||
Cash
and equivalents, end of period
|
$ | 8,167 | $ | 19,641 | ||||
Cash
paid for taxes
|
$ | 8 | $ | 305 | ||||
Cash
paid for interest
|
$ | 10,993 | $ | 9,801 | ||||
Non-cash
investing and financing activities:
|
||||||||
Additions
to property, plant and equipment unpaid during period
|
$ | 324 | $ | 2,171 | ||||
Additions
to property, plant and equipment financed with notes payable and capital
lease
|
$ | 445 | $ | — | ||||
Additions
to debt and deferred offering costs unpaid during period
|
$ | — | $ | 37 |
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial
statements.
6
BioFuel
Energy Corp.
Notes
to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
1.
|
Organization,
Nature of Business, and Basis of
Presentation
|
Organization
and Nature of Business
BioFuel
Energy Corp. (the “Company”, “we”, “our” or “us”) produces and sells
ethanol and distillers grain, through its two ethanol production facilities
located in Wood River, Nebraska (“Wood River”) and Fairmont, Minnesota
(“Fairmont”). Both facilities, with a combined annual nameplate production
capacity of 230 Mmgy, based on the maximum amount of permitted denaturant,
commenced start-up and began commercial operations in late June 2008.
At each location, Cargill, Incorporated (“Cargill”), a related party with whom
we have an extensive contractual relationship, has a strong local presence and
owns adjacent grain storage facilities. From inception, we have worked
closely with Cargill, one of the world’s leading agribusiness companies. Cargill
provides corn procurement services, markets the ethanol and distillers grain we
produce and provides transportation logistics for our two plants under long-term
contracts. In addition, we lease their adjacent grain storage and handling
facilities. Our operations and cash flows are subject to fluctuations due
to changes in commodity prices. We may use derivative financial
instruments, such as futures contracts, swaps and option contracts to manage
commodity prices as further discussed in Note 8.
We were
incorporated as a Delaware corporation on April 11, 2006 to invest solely
in BioFuel Energy, LLC (the “LLC”), a limited liability company organized on
January 25, 2006 to build and operate a series of ethanol production
facilities in the Midwestern United States. The Company’s headquarters are
located in Denver, Colorado.
At
September 30, 2009, the Company owned 75.0% of the LLC membership units
with the remaining 25.0% owned by the historical equity investors of the
LLC. The Class B common shares of the Company are held by the
historical equity investors of the LLC, who held 8,149,431 membership interests
in the LLC that, together with the corresponding Class B shares, can be
exchanged for newly issued shares of common stock of the Company on a
one-for-one basis. During the nine months ended September 30, 2009, unit
holders exchanged 1,932,817 membership units in the LLC for common stock
substantially all of which are or will be eligible for sale under Rule 144
promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933 (the “Act”) upon lapse of a
six-month holding period. LLC membership units held by the
historical equity investors are recorded as noncontrolling interest on the
consolidated balance sheets. Holders of shares of Class B common
stock have no economic rights but are entitled to one vote for each share
held. Shares of Class B common stock are retired upon exchange of the
related membership units in the LLC.
The
aggregate book value of the assets of the LLC at September 30, 2009 and
December 31, 2008 was approximately $347.7 million and $373.6 million,
respectively, and such assets are collateral for the LLC’s obligations. Our bank
facility imposes restrictions on the ability of the LLC’s subsidiaries that own
and operate our Wood River and Fairmont plants to pay dividends or make other
distributions to us, which restricts our ability to pay dividends.
From
inception through June 30, 2008, the LLC’s operations primarily consisted
of arranging financing for and constructing its two ethanol plants in Wood River
and Fairmont. Both plants commenced start-up and began the production of
ethanol in late June 2008. In late August 2008, both plants
reached provisional acceptance, the first of three tests required under their
respective turn-key construction contracts, at which time operational control of
the plants passed to the LLC from the contractor. We exited development
stage status in the third quarter of 2008. Both plants achieved project
completion milestones in December 2008.
Basis
of Presentation and Liquidity Considerations
The
accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in conformity
with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America,
which contemplate our continuation as a going concern. Our results of
operations and financial condition depend substantially on the price of our main
commodity input, corn, relative to the price of our main commodity product,
ethanol, which is known in the industry as the “crush spread”. The prices
of these commodities are volatile and beyond our control. As shown in the
accompanying consolidated financial statements, the Company incurred a net loss
of $8.4 million and $28.5 million during the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2009, respectively, primarily resulting from poor operating
margins due to unfavorable crush spreads and operating issues in addition to
increased legal, financial advisory, and interest expenses associated with the
Company’s negotiations with its lenders relating to restructuring and loan
conversion.
Certain
subsidiaries of the LLC (the “Operating Subsidiaries”) received a Notice of
Default dated May 22, 2009 from its lenders under the senior secured credit
facility (“Senior Debt facility”), asserting that a “material adverse effect”
had occurred. The Company disagreed with the lenders assertion that a
material adverse effect had occurred and, beginning on May 28, 2009, entered
into a series of consent agreements with its lenders granting the Operating
Subsidiaries limited access to its bank accounts as it continued discussions
with the lenders relating to the asserted events of default and conversion of
the construction loans to term loans. Effective September 29, 2009, the
Operating Subsidiaries entered into a Waiver and Amendment to the Senior Debt
which converted the two construction loans to two term loans and waived all
defaults previously asserted by the lenders. At conversion, the Waiver and
Amendment to the Senior Debt provided for $198.6 million of total funded debt
under the term loans. Following the conversion, the Operating Subsidiaries
made their first principal payment on September 30, 2009 of $3.2 million which
resulted in $195.4 million in term loans outstanding as of September 30,
2009. The Waiver and Amendment to the Senior Debt also provides for up to
$9.7 million in additional loans to make future principal and interest payments
under the Senior Debt facility.
7
Although
we have come to a resolution with the lenders concerning our Senior Debt
facility and losses have narrowed in the third quarter as a result of crush
spreads steadily improving throughout the year to date, we cannot predict when
or if crush spreads will narrow again or if current or more favorable margins
will continue. In the event crush spreads narrow further, and remain at
unprofitable levels for an extended period of time, we may not be able to
generate sufficient cash flow to meet our obligations and sustain our
operations. In
addition, we have had, and continue to have, severely limited liquidity, with
$8.2 million in cash on hand as of September 30, 2009. If we do not
have sufficient cash flow to service our debt, we would need to refinance all or
part of our existing debt, sell assets, borrow more money or sell securities,
any or all of which we may not be able to do on commercially reasonable terms or
at all. If we are unable to do so, we may be required to curtail
operations or cease operating altogether.
2.
|
Summary
of Significant Accounting Policies
|
Principles
of Consolidation and Noncontrolling Interest
The
accompanying consolidated financial statements include the Company, the LLC and
its wholly owned subsidiaries: BFE Holding Company, LLC; BFE Operating Company,
LLC; Buffalo Lake Energy, LLC; and Pioneer Trail Energy, LLC. All
inter-company balances and transactions have been eliminated in
consolidation.
Use
of Estimates
Preparation
of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States (“GAAP”) requires management to make estimates and
assumptions that affect reported amounts of assets and liabilities and
disclosures in the accompanying notes at the date of the financial statements
and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting
period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Revenue
Recognition
Sales and
related costs of goods sold are included in income when risk of loss and title
transfers upon delivery of ethanol and distillers grain to Cargill. In
accordance with the LLC’s agreements, through its subsidiaries, with Cargill for
the marketing and sale of ethanol and related products, commissions, freight,
and shipping and handling charges are deducted from the gross sales price at the
time revenue is recognized. Ethanol sales are recorded net of
commissions. Commissions on ethanol sales totaled $798,000 and $2,474,000
during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, respectively and
totaled $925,000 in both the three and nine month periods ended September 30,
2008. Sales of dried distillers grain with solubles (“DDGS”) and wet
distillers grain with solubles (“WDGS”) are also recorded net of
commissions. Commissions on distillers grain totaled $546,000 and
$2,005,000 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009,
respectively, and totaled $556,000 and $579,000 during the three and nine months
ended September 30, 2008, respectively.
Cost
of goods sold
Cost of
goods sold primarily includes costs of raw materials (primarily corn and natural
gas), purchasing and receiving costs, inspection costs, shipping costs, other
distribution expenses, plant management, certain compensation costs and general
facility overhead charges.
General
and administrative expenses
General
and administrative expenses consist of salaries and benefits paid to our
management and administrative employees, expenses relating to third party
services, insurance, travel, office rent, marketing and other expenses,
including certain expenses associated with being a public company, such as fees
paid to our independent auditors associated with our annual audit and quarterly
reviews, compliance with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, and listing
and transfer agent fees. During the three and nine months ended September
30, 2009, significant third party legal and financial advisory
expenses were incurred associated with the Company's negotiations with its
lenders relating to restructuring and loan conversion.
Cash
and Equivalents
Cash and
equivalents include highly liquid investments with an original maturity of three
months or less. Cash equivalents are currently comprised of money market
mutual funds. At September 30, 2009, we had $2,257,000 invested in money
market mutual funds held at one financial institution, which is in excess of
FDIC insurance limits.
8
Accounts
Receivable
Accounts
receivable are carried at original invoice amount less an estimate made for
doubtful receivables based on a review of all outstanding amounts on a monthly
basis. Management determines the allowance for doubtful accounts by
regularly evaluating individual customer receivables and considering a
customer’s financial condition, credit history and current economic
conditions. Receivables are written off when deemed uncollectible.
Recoveries of receivables previously written off are recorded as a reduction to
bad debt expense when received. As of September 30, 2009 and
December 31, 2008, Cargill was our only customer and no allowance was
considered necessary.
Concentrations
of Credit Risk
Credit
risk represents the accounting loss that would be recognized at the reporting
date if counterparties failed completely to perform as contracted.
Concentrations of credit risk, whether on- or off-balance sheet, that arise from
financial instruments exist for groups of customers or counterparties when they
have similar economic characteristics that would cause their ability to meet
contractual obligations to be similarly affected by changes in economic or other
conditions described below.
During
the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, the Company recorded
sales to Cargill representing 100% of total net sales. As of
September 30, 2009, the LLC, through its subsidiaries, had receivables from
Cargill of approximately $16.2 million, representing 100% of total accounts
receivable.
The LLC,
through its subsidiaries, purchases corn, its largest cost component in
producing ethanol, from Cargill. During the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2009, corn purchases from Cargill totaled $60.6 million and
$208.0 million, respectively, and during the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2008, totaled $76.1 million and $113.1 million,
respectively.
Inventories
Raw
materials inventories, which consist primarily of corn, denaturant, supplies,
and chemicals and work in process inventories are valued at the
lower-of-cost-or-market, with cost determined on a first-in, first-out
basis. Finished goods inventories consist of ethanol and distillers grain
and are stated at lower of average cost or market.
A summary
of inventories is as follows (in thousands):
September 30,
|
December 31,
|
|||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
Raw
materials
|
$ | 8,209 | $ | 8,687 | ||||
Work
in process
|
2,300 | 2,052 | ||||||
Finished
goods
|
3,200 | 4,190 | ||||||
$ | 13,709 | $ | 14,929 |
Due to a
decline in commodity prices, the LLC recorded a lower of cost or market
inventory write-down of $189,000 for corn and $12,000 for distillers grains at
September 30, 2009 and a write down of $450,000 for ethanol at
December 31, 2008.
Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities
Derivatives
are recognized on the balance sheet at their fair value and are included in the
accompanying balance sheets as “derivative financial instruments.” On the
date the derivative contract is entered into, the Company may designate the
derivative as a hedge of a forecasted transaction or of the variability of cash
flows to be received or paid related to a recognized asset or liability (“cash
flow” hedge). Changes in the fair value of a derivative that is highly
effective and that is designated and qualifies as a cash flow hedge are recorded
in other comprehensive income, net of tax effect, until earnings are affected by
the variability of cash flows (e.g., when periodic settlements on a variable
rate asset or liability are recorded in earnings). Changes in the fair
value of undesignated derivative instruments or derivatives that do not qualify
for hedge accounting are recognized in current period operations. The
Company has designated its interest rate swaps as cash flow hedges. The
value of these instruments is recorded on the balance sheet as an asset in other
assets, and as a liability under derivative financial instruments, while the
unrealized gain/loss on the change in the fair value has been recorded in other
comprehensive income (loss). The statement of operations impact of these
hedges is included in interest expense. See Note 8 for additional required
disclosure.
Accounting
guidance for derivatives requires a company to evaluate contracts to determine
whether the contracts are derivatives. Certain contracts that meet the
definition of a derivative may be exempted as normal purchases or normal
sales. Normal purchases and normal sales are contracts that provide for
the purchase or sale of something other than a financial instrument or
derivative instrument that will be delivered in quantities expected to be used
or sold over a reasonable period in the normal course of business. The
Company’s contracts that meet the requirements of normal purchases are exempted
from the derivative accounting and reporting requirements.
9
Certificates
of Deposit
At
September 30, 2009, certificates of deposit was comprised of approximately
$1.9 million held in three certificates of deposit with remaining maturities
less than one year. These certificates of deposit have been pledged as
collateral supporting three letters of credit. Two of these certificates
of deposit totaling $0.7 million are held at one financial institution, which is
in excess of FDIC insurance limits. The remaining certificate of deposit
for $1.2 million is held with another financial institution and this amount is
also in excess of FDIC insurance limits.
Restricted
Cash
At
September 30, 2009, there were no amounts held as restricted cash. At
December 31, 2008, restricted cash was comprised of $1,615,000, held in
debt service reserve accounts in accordance with our Senior Debt facility.
The balance outstanding as of December 31, 2008 was utilized to pay interest
amounts due under the Senior Debt facility during the nine months ended
September 30, 2009.
Property,
Plant and Equipment
Property,
plant and equipment is recorded at cost. All costs related to purchasing
and developing land or the engineering, design and construction of a plant are
capitalized. Maintenance, repairs and minor replacements are charged to
operating expenses while major replacements and improvements are
capitalized. Costs not directly related to a site or plants are
expensed. The Company began depreciation of land improvements and its
plant assets in September 2008 as construction of its production facilities
was considered to be complete at the end of August 2008. Depreciation
is computed by the straight-line method over the following estimated useful
lives:
Years
|
||||
Land
improvements
|
20-30 | |||
Buildings
and improvements
|
7-40 | |||
Machinery
and equipment:
|
||||
Railroad
equipment
|
20-39 | |||
Facility
equipment
|
20-39 | |||
Other
|
5-7 | |||
Office
furniture and equipment
|
3-10 |
Capitalized
Interest
The
Company capitalized interest costs and the amortization of debt issuance costs
related to its ethanol plant development and construction expenditures through
August 2008 as part of the cost of constructed assets. There were no
interest or debt issuance costs capitalized for the three or nine months ended
September 30, 2009. Interest and debt issuance costs capitalized for
the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008 totaled $2,849,000 and
$10,208,000, respectively.
Debt
Issuance Costs
Debt
issuance costs are stated at cost, less accumulated amortization. Debt
issuance costs represent costs incurred related to the Company’s senior debt,
subordinated debt and tax increment financing agreements. These costs are
being amortized over the term of the related debt and any such amortization was
capitalized as part of the value of construction in progress during the
construction period. After the Wood River and Fairmont plants reached
provisional acceptance in August 2008, the amortization of debt issuance
costs has been expensed. Estimated future debt issuance cost amortization
as of September 30, 2009 is as follows (in thousands):
Remainder
of 2009
|
$ | 362 | ||
2010
|
1,409 | |||
2011
|
1,298 | |||
2012
|
1,298 | |||
2013
|
1,298 | |||
Thereafter
|
1,168 | |||
Total
|
$ | 6,833 |
10
Impairment
of Long-Lived Assets
The
Company assesses impairment of long-lived assets, which are comprised primarily
of property, plant and equipment related to the Company’s ethanol plants
whenever circumstances indicate their carrying value may not be fully
recoverable. Recoverability is measured by comparing the carrying value of
an asset with estimated undiscounted future cash flows expected to result from
the use of the asset and its eventual disposition. An impairment loss is
reflected as the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset exceeds the
fair value of the asset. Fair value is determined based on the present
value of estimated expected future cash flows using a discount rate commensurate
with the risk involved, quoted market prices or appraised values, depending on
the nature of the assets. As of September 30, 2009, no circumstances
existed which would indicate the carrying value of long-lived assets may not be
fully recoverable. Therefore, no recoverability test was
performed.
Stock-Based
Compensation
Expense
associated with stock-based awards and other forms of equity compensation is
based on fair value at grant and recognized on a straight line basis in the
financial statements over the requisite service period, if any, for those awards
that are expected to vest. The Company adopted the use of the simplified
method of calculating the expected term for stock-based grants during
2008. During 2009, the Company used historical data to calculate the
expected term for new stock-based grants.
Asset
Retirement Obligations
Asset
retirement obligations are recognized when a contractual or legal obligation
exists and a reasonable estimate of the amount can be made. At
September 30, 2009, the Company had accrued asset retirement obligation
liabilities of $132,000 and $167,000 for its plants at Wood River and Fairmont,
respectively. At December 31, 2008, the Company had accrued asset
retirement obligation liabilities of $129,000 and $162,000 for its plants at
Wood River and Fairmont, respectively.
The asset
retirement obligations accrued for Wood River relate to the obligations in our
contracts with Cargill and Union Pacific Railroad (“Union Pacific”).
According to the grain elevator lease with Cargill, the equipment that is
adjacent to the grain elevator may be required at Cargill’s discretion to be
removed at the end of the lease. In addition, according to the
contract with Union Pacific, the buildings that are built near their land in
Wood River may be required at Union Pacific’s request to be removed at the end
of our contract with them. The asset retirement obligations accrued for
Fairmont relate to the obligations in our contracts with Cargill and in our
water permit with the state of Minnesota. According to the grain elevator
lease with Cargill, the equipment that is adjacent to the grain elevator being
leased may be required at Cargill’s discretion to be removed at the end of the
lease. In addition, the water permit in Fairmont requires that we
secure all above ground storage tanks whenever we discontinue the use of our
equipment for an extended period of time in Fairmont. The estimated costs
of these obligations have been accrued at the current net present value of these
obligations at the end of an estimated 20 year life for each of the
plants. These liabilities have corresponding assets recorded in property,
plant and equipment, which are being depreciated over 20 years.
Income
Taxes
The
Company accounts for income taxes using the asset and liability method, under
which deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax
consequences attributable to temporary differences between financial statement
carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax
bases and operating loss and tax credit carryforwards. Deferred tax assets
and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to
taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to
be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities
of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the
enactment date. The Company regularly reviews historical and anticipated
future pre-tax results of operations to determine whether the Company will be
able to realize the benefit of its deferred tax assets. A valuation
allowance is required to reduce the potential deferred tax asset when it is more
likely than not that all or some portion of the potential deferred tax asset
will not be realized due to the lack of sufficient taxable income. The
Company establishes reserves for uncertain tax positions that reflect its best
estimate of deductions and credits that may not be sustained. As the
Company has incurred losses since its inception and expects to continue to incur
losses for the foreseeable future, we will provide a valuation allowance against
all deferred tax assets until the Company believes that such assets will be
realized. The Company includes interest on tax deficiencies and income tax
penalties in the provision for income taxes.
Fair
Value of Financial Instruments
The
Company’s financial instruments, including cash and equivalents, accounts
receivable, certificates of deposit, and accounts payable are carried at cost,
which approximates their fair value because of the short-term maturity of these
instruments. The fair value of the Company’s senior debt and notes payable
(excluding the Cargill note payable) approximates their carrying amounts based
on anticipated interest rates that management believes would currently be
available to the Company for similar issues of debt, taking into account the
current credit risk of the Company and other market factors. The Company
is unable to determine a fair value of its subordinated debt and its note
payable to Cargill due to the nature of the relationship between the parties and
the Company. The derivative financial instruments are carried at fair
value.
11
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
Comprehensive
income (loss) consists of the unrealized changes in the fair value on the
Company’s financial instruments designated as cash flow hedges. The
financial instrument liabilities are recorded at fair value and the changes in
the fair value are recorded as other comprehensive income (loss).
Interim
Financial Statements
In
May 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued new
requirements related to subsequent events, to incorporate the accounting and
disclosure requirements for subsequent events into GAAP. This new
requirement introduces new terminology, defines a date through which management
must evaluate subsequent events, and lists the circumstances under which an
entity must recognize and disclose events or transactions occurring after the
balance-sheet date. The Company adopted these new requirements as of
June 30, 2009, which was the required effective date.
The
Company evaluated its September 30, 2009 financial statements for
subsequent events through November 12, 2009, the date the financial statements
were issued. The Company is not aware of any subsequent events which would
require recognition or disclosure in the financial statements.
From time
to time, new accounting pronouncements are issued by the FASB or other standards
setting bodies that are adopted by us as of the specified effective date. Unless
otherwise discussed, our management believes that the impact of recently issued
standards that are not yet effective will not have a material impact on our
consolidated financial statements upon adoption.
3.
|
Property,
Plant and Equipment
|
Property,
plant and equipment, stated at cost, consist of the following at September 30,
2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively (in thousands):
September 30,
|
December 31,
|
|||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
Land
and land improvements
|
$ | 19,637 | $ | 18,887 | ||||
Construction
in progress
|
2,196 | 1,690 | ||||||
Buildings
and improvements
|
49,379 | 49,138 | ||||||
Machinery and
equipment
|
241,337 | 238,918 | ||||||
Office
furniture and equipment
|
6,047 | 5,982 | ||||||
318,596 | 314,615 | |||||||
Accumulated
depreciation
|
(29,088 | ) | (9,265 | ) | ||||
Property,
plant and equipment, net
|
$ | 289,508 | $ | 305,350 |
Depreciation
expense related to property, plant and equipment was $6,669,000 and $19,823,000
for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 and $2,417,000 and
$2,543,000 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008.
The
Company began depreciating land improvements and its plant assets in
September 2008 as construction of the Wood River and Fairmont plants was
considered to be complete at the end of August 2008. The Company has
netted liquidated damages, arising out of completion delays at both plants, of
$19.1 million against its plant assets. The construction retainage amounts
included in property, plant and equipment at December 31, 2008 were
$5,218,000 related to the Fairmont facility and $4,189,000 related to the Wood
River facility. The construction retainage amounts payable as of
December 31, 2008 were paid in full in February 2009.
4.
|
Earnings
Per Share
|
Basic
earnings per share are computed by dividing net income by the weighted average
number of common shares outstanding during each period. Diluted earnings
per share are calculated using the treasury stock method and includes the effect
of all dilutive securities, including stock options, restricted stock and
Class B common shares. For those periods in which the Company
incurred a net loss, the inclusion of the potentially dilutive shares in the
computation of diluted weighted average shares outstanding would have been
anti-dilutive to the Company’s loss per share, and, accordingly, all potentially
dilutive shares have been excluded from the computation of diluted weighted
average shares outstanding in those periods.
For both
the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, 334,075 shares issuable
upon the exercise of stock options have been excluded from the computation of
diluted earnings per share as the exercise price exceeded the average price of
the Company’s shares during the period. For both the three and nine months
ended September 30, 2008, 602,700 shares issuable upon the exercise of
stock options have been excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per
share as the exercise price exceeded the average price of the Company’s shares
during the period.
12
A summary
of the reconciliation of basic weighted average shares outstanding to diluted
weighted average shares outstanding follows:
Three Months Ended
September 30,
|
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
|
|||||||||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||||||||
Weighted
average common shares outstanding - basic
|
24,397,327 | 15,209,891 | 23,418,419 | 15,250,384 | ||||||||||||
Potentially
dilutive common stock equivalents
|
||||||||||||||||
Class B
common shares
|
8,149,431 | 17,303,151 | 9,115,731 | 17,340,019 | ||||||||||||
Restricted
stock
|
28,564 | 88,162 | 43,801 | 102,266 | ||||||||||||
8,177,995 | 17,391,313 | 9,159,532 | 17,442,285 | |||||||||||||
32,575,322 | 32,601,204 | 32,557,951 | 32,692,669 | |||||||||||||
Less
anti-dilutive common stock equivalents
|
(8,177,995 | ) | (17,391,313 | ) | (9,159,532 | ) | (17,442,285 | ) | ||||||||
Weighted
average common shares outstanding - diluted
|
24,397,327 | 15,209,891 | 23,418,419 | 15,250,384 |
5.
|
Long-Term
Debt
|
The
following table summarizes long-term debt (in thousands):
September 30,
|
December 31,
|
|||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
Term
(formerly construction) loans
|
$ | 195,387 | $ | 181,150 | ||||
Subordinated
debt
|
20,075 | 20,595 | ||||||
Working
capital loans
|
20,000 | 17,000 | ||||||
Notes
payable
|
16,430 | 16,709 | ||||||
Capital
leases
|
2,540 | 2,485 | ||||||
254,432 | 237,939 | |||||||
Less
current portion
|
(33,647 | ) | (11,588 | ) | ||||
Long
term portion
|
$ | 220,785 | $ | 226,351 |
In
September 2006, the Operating Subsidiaries entered into a Senior Secured
Credit Facility providing for the availability of $230.0 million of borrowings
(“Senior Debt”) with BNP Paribas and a syndicate of lenders to finance
construction and operation of the Wood River and Fairmont plants. The
Senior Debt initially consisted of two construction loans, which together
totaled $210.0 million of available borrowings, and working capital loans of up
to $20.0 million. No principal payments were required until the
construction loans were converted to term loans. Thereafter, principal
payments are payable quarterly at a minimum amount of $3,150,000, with
additional pre-payments to be made out of available cash flow. The
Operating Subsidiaries received a Notice of Default from the lenders, dated May
22, 2009, asserting that a “material adverse effect” had occurred due to the
Company’s lack of liquidity. The Company disagreed with the lenders
assertion that a material adverse effect had occurred and, beginning on May 28,
2009, entered into a series of consent agreements with its lenders granting the
Operating Subsidiaries limited access to its bank accounts as it continued
discussions with the lenders relating to the asserted events of default and
conversion of the construction loans to term loans. Effective September
29, 2009, the Operating Subsidiaries entered into a Waiver and Amendment to the
Senior Debt which converted the two construction loans to two term loans and
waived all defaults previously asserted by the lenders. At conversion, the
Waiver and Amendment to the Senior Debt provided for $198.6 million of total
funded debt under the term loans. Following the conversion, the Operating
Subsidiaries made their first principal payment on September 30, 2009 of $3.2
million which resulted in $195.4 million in term loans outstanding as of
September 30, 2009. The Waiver and Amendment to the Senior Debt also
provides for up to $9.7 million in additional loans to make future principal and
interest payments under the Senior Debt facility. These term loans mature
in September 2014.
13
Senior
Debt also includes working capital loans of up to $20.0 million, a portion of
which may be used as letters of credit. The working capital loans mature in
September 2010, and as a result the entire outstanding amount of such loans
was classified as current as of September 30, 2009. However, with consent
from two-thirds of the lenders, the maturity date of the working capital loans
may be extended to September 2011. Interest rates on Senior Debt
(term loans and working capital loans) are, at management’s option, set at:
i) a base rate, which is the higher of the federal funds rate plus 0.5% or
BNP Paribas’ prime rate, in each case plus a margin of 2.0%; or ii) at LIBOR
plus 3.0%. Interest on base rate loans is payable quarterly and, depending
on the LIBOR rate elected, as frequently as monthly on LIBOR loans, but no less
frequently than quarterly. The weighted average interest rate in effect on
the borrowings at September 30, 2009 was 3.3%. Neither the Company nor the
LLC is a borrower under the Senior Debt, although the equity interests and
assets of our subsidiaries are pledged as collateral to secure the debt under
the facility.
While we
have borrowed substantial amounts under our Senior Debt facility, additional
borrowings remain subject to the satisfaction of a number of
additional conditions precedent, including continuing compliance with debt
covenants and payment of principal and interest when due. The Senior Debt
is secured by a first lien on all rights, titles and interests in the Wood River
and Fairmont plants and any accounts receivable or property associated with
those plants. The Company has established collateral deposit accounts
maintained by an agent of the banks, into which our revenues are
deposited. These funds are then allocated into various sweep accounts held
by the collateral agent, with the remaining cash, if any, to be distributed to
the Company each month. The sweep accounts have various provisions,
including an interest coverage ratio and debt service reserve requirements,
which restrict the amount of cash that is made available to the Company each
month. The terms of the Senior Debt include certain limitations on, among other
things, the ability of the Operating Subsidiaries to incur additional debt,
grant liens or encumbrances, declare or pay dividends or distributions, conduct
asset sales or other dispositions, merge or consolidate, conduct transactions
with affiliates and amend, modify or change the scope of the Wood River and
Fairmont construction projects, the project agreements or the budgets relating
to them. The terms of the Senior Debt also contain customary events of
default including failure to meet payment obligations, failure to pay financial
obligations, failure of the LLC to remain solvent and failure to obtain or
maintain required governmental approvals.
As of
September 30, 2009, the Company’s subsidiaries had $215.4 million
outstanding under the Senior Debt facility, which included $195.4 million of
outstanding term loans and $20.0 million of outstanding working capital
loans.
A
quarterly commitment fee of 0.50% per annum on the unused portion of available
Senior Debt is payable. Debt issuance fees and expenses of approximately
$8.5 million ($5.2 million, net of accumulated amortization) have been incurred
in connection with the Senior Debt at September 30, 2009. These costs
have been deferred and are being amortized over the term of the Senior Debt,
although the amortization of debt issuance costs during the period of
construction through August 2008 were capitalized as part of the cost of
the constructed assets.
In
September 2006, the LLC entered into a loan agreement with certain
Class A unitholders (“Sub Lenders”) providing for up to $50.0 million of
loans (“Subordinated Debt”) to be used for general corporate purposes including
construction of the Wood River and Fairmont plants. The Subordinated Debt
must be repaid by no later than March 2015. Interest on Subordinated
Debt was payable quarterly in arrears at a 15.0% annual rate. The LLC did
not make the scheduled quarterly interest payments that were due on
September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2008. Under the terms of the
Subordinated Debt, the failure to pay interest when due is an event of
default. In January 2009, the LLC and the Sub Lenders entered into a
waiver and amendment agreement to the loan agreement (“Waiver and
Amendment”). Under the Waiver and Amendment, an initial payment of $2.0
million, which was made on January 16, 2009, was made to pay the $767,000
of accrued interest due September 30, 2008 and to reduce outstanding
principal by $1,233,000. Effective upon the $2.0 million initial payment,
the Sub Lenders waived the defaults and any associated penalty interest relating
to the LLC’s failure to make the September 30, 2008 and the
December 31, 2008 quarterly interest payments. Effective
December 1, 2008, interest on the Subordinated Debt began accruing at a
5.0% annual rate compounded quarterly, a rate that will apply until the debt
with Cargill (under an agreement entered into simultaneously) has been paid in
full, at which time the rate will revert to a 15.0% annual rate and quarterly
payments in arrears are required. As long as the debt with Cargill remains
outstanding, future payments to the Sub Lenders are contingent upon available
cash received by the LLC, as defined in the Waiver and Amendment. The
Subordinated Debt is secured by the equity of the
subsidiaries of the LLC owning the Wood River and Fairmont plant sites and fully
and unconditionally guaranteed by those subsidiaries, which guarantees are
subordinated to the obligations of the subsidiaries under our Senior Debt
facility. A default under our Senior Debt would also constitute a default
under our Subordinated Debt and would entitle the lenders to accelerate the
repayment of amounts outstanding. The receipt by the Company of the Notice
of Default dated May 22, 2009, from the lenders under the Senior Debt
facility constituted an event of default under the Subordinated Debt. The
Sub Lenders did not elect to exercise any of the rights and remedies available
to them as a result of the Notice of Default under the Senior Debt facility, and
did not declare or otherwise provide a notice of acceleration. Since all
of the asserted events of default under the Senior Debt facility were waived by
the lenders under that facility on September 29, 2009, there is no longer an
event of default under the Subordinated Debt.
Debt
issuance fees and expenses of approximately $5.5 million ($1.5 million, net of
accumulated amortization) have been incurred in connection with the Subordinated
Debt at September 30, 2009. Debt issuance costs associated with the
Subordinated Debt are being deferred and amortized over the term of the
agreement, although the amortization of debt issuance costs during the period of
construction through August 2008 were capitalized as part of the cost of
the constructed assets. All $50.0 million available under the Subordinated
Debt was borrowed in the first six months of 2007. During the third
quarter of 2007, the Company retired $30.0 million of its Subordinated Debt with
a portion of the proceeds from the initial public offering of the Company’s
stock. This resulted in accelerated amortization of debt issuance fees of
approximately $3.1 million in 2007, which represents the pro rata share of the
retired debt.
14
In
January 2009, the LLC and Cargill entered into an agreement (“Cargill
Agreement”) which finalized the payment terms for $17.4 million owed to Cargill
(“Cargill Debt”) by the LLC related to hedging losses with respect to corn
hedging contracts that had been liquidated in the third quarter of 2008.
See Note 8 — Derivative Financial Instruments. The Cargill Agreement
required an initial payment of $3.0 million on the outstanding balance, which
was paid on December 5, 2008. Upon the initial payment of $3.0
million, Cargill also forgave $3.0 million. Effective December 1,
2008, interest on the Cargill Debt began accruing at a 5.0% annual rate
compounded quarterly. Future payments to Cargill of both principal and
interest are contingent upon available cash received by the LLC, as defined in
the Cargill Agreement. Cargill will forgive, on a dollar for dollar basis
a further $2.8 million as it receives the next $2.8 million of principal
payments. The Cargill Debt is being accounted for as a troubled debt
restructuring. As the future cash payments specified by the terms of the
Cargill Agreement exceed the carrying amount of the debt before the $3.0 million
was forgiven, the carrying amount of the debt is not reduced and no gain is
recorded. As future payments are made, the LLC will determine, based on
the timing of payments, whether or not any gain should be recorded.
The
Company had three letters of credit for a total of approximately $1.9 million
outstanding as of September 30, 2009. These letters of credit have
been provided as collateral to the natural gas provider at the Fairmont plant
and the electrical service providers at both the Fairmont and Wood River plants,
and are all secured by certificates of deposit in the respective
amounts.
The LLC,
through its subsidiary that constructed the Fairmont plant, has entered into an
agreement with the local utility pursuant to which the utility has built and
owns and operates a substation and distribution facility in order to supply
electricity to the plant. The LLC is paying a fixed facilities charge
based on the cost of the substation and distribution facility of $34,000 per
month, over the 30-year term of the agreement. This fixed facilities
charge is being accounted for as a capital lease in the accompanying financial
statements. The agreement also includes a $25,000 monthly minimum energy
charge, which also began in the first quarter of 2008.
Notes
payable relate to certain financing agreements in place at each of our sites, as
well as the Cargill Debt. The subsidiaries of the LLC that constructed the
plants entered into financing agreements in the first quarter of 2008 for the
purchase of certain rolling stock equipment to be used at the facilities for
$748,000. The notes have fixed interest rates (weighted average rate of
approximately 5.6%) and require 48 monthly payments of principal and interest,
maturing in the first and second quarter of 2012. In addition, the
subsidiary of the LLC that constructed the Wood River facility has entered into
a note payable for $2,220,000 with a fixed interest rate of 11.8% for the
purchase of our natural gas pipeline. The note requires 36 monthly payments of
principal and interest and matures in the first quarter of 2011. In
addition, the subsidiary of the LLC that constructed the Wood River facility has
entered in a note payable for $419,000 with the City of Wood River for special
assessments related to street, water, and sanitary improvements at our Wood
River facility. This note requires 10 annual payments of $58,000,
including interest at 6.5%, and matures in 2018.
The
following table summarizes the aggregate maturities of our long term debt as of
September 30, 2009 (in thousands):
Remainder
of 2009
|
$ | 3,387 | ||
2010
|
33,674 | |||
2011
|
12,997 | |||
2012
|
12,706 | |||
2013
|
12,647 | |||
Thereafter
|
179,021 | |||
Total
|
$ | 254,432 |
6.
|
Tax
Increment Financing
|
In
February 2007, the subsidiary of the LLC that constructed the Wood River
plant received $6.0 million from the proceeds of a tax increment revenue note
issued by the City of Wood River, Nebraska. The proceeds funded
improvements to property owned by the subsidiary. The City of Wood River
will pay the principal and interest of the note from the incremental increase in
the property taxes related to the improvements made to the property. The
interest rate on the note is 7.85%. The proceeds have been recorded as a
liability and will be reduced as the subsidiary remits property taxes to the
City of Wood River, beginning in 2008 and continuing for approximately 13
years.
The LLC
has guaranteed the principal and interest of the tax increment revenue note if,
for any reason, the City of Wood River fails to make the required payments to
the holder of the note.
On
June 15, 2008, December 15, 2008, and June 15, 2009 the first
three principal payments on the note were made. Due to delays in the plant
construction, property taxes on the plant in 2008 and the first half of 2009
were lower than anticipated and therefore, the LLC was required to pay $760,000
in 2008 and $228,000 in 2009 as a portion of the note payments.
15
The
following table summarizes the aggregate maturities of the tax increment
financing debt as of September 30, 2009 (in thousands):
Remainder
of 2009
|
$ | 290 | ||
2010
|
318 | |||
2011
|
343 | |||
2012
|
370 | |||
2013
|
399 | |||
Thereafter
|
4,318 | |||
Total
|
$ | 6,038 |
7.
|
Stockholders’
Equity
|
On
October 15, 2007, the Company announced the adoption of a stock repurchase
plan authorizing the repurchase of up to $7.5 million of the Company’s common
stock. Purchases will be funded out of cash on hand and made from time to
time in the open market. From the inception of the buyback program through
September 30, 2009, the Company had repurchased 809,606 shares at an average
price of $5.30 per share, leaving $3,184,000 available under the repurchase
plan. The shares repurchased are being held as treasury
stock.
The
Company has not declared any dividends on its common stock and does not
anticipate paying dividends in the foreseeable future. In addition, the
terms of the Senior Debt contain restrictions on the ability of the LLC to pay
dividends or other distributions, which will restrict the Company’s ability to
pay dividends in the future.
8.
|
Derivative
Financial Instruments
|
On
January 1, 2009, the Company adopted new disclosure requirements related to
its derivative financial instruments. The adoption of these new
requirements had no financial impact on our consolidated financial statements
and only required additional financial statement disclosures. We have
applied these requirements on a prospective basis. Accordingly, disclosure
related to interim periods prior to the date of adoption have not been
presented.
We use
interest rate swaps to manage the economic effect of variable interest
obligations associated with our floating rate Senior Debt facility so that the
interest payable on a portion of the principal value of the Senior Debt facility
effectively becomes fixed at a certain rate, thereby reducing the impact of
future interest rate changes on our future interest expense. The unrealized
losses on these interest rate swaps are included in accumulated other
comprehensive income (loss) and the corresponding fair value liabilities are
included in the current portion of derivative financial instrument liability in
our consolidated balance sheet. The monthly interest settlements are
reclassified from other comprehensive income (loss) to interest expense as they
are settled each month. The full amount of accumulated other comprehensive
income (loss) at September 30, 2009 related to these interest rate swaps
will be reclassified to the statement of operations over the next twelve months
as they expire. See Note 5 for further discussion of interest rates on the
Senior Debt facility.
In
September 2007, the LLC, through its subsidiary, entered into an interest
rate swap for a two-year period that has been designated as a hedge of cash
flows related to the interest payments on the underlying debt. The
contract was for $60.0 million principal with a fixed interest rate of 4.65%,
payable by the subsidiary and the variable interest rate, the one-month LIBOR,
payable by the third party. The difference between the subsidiary’s fixed
rate of 4.65% and the one-month LIBOR rate, which is reset every 30 days, is
received or paid every 30 days in arrears. The interest rate swap expired
in September 2009, and therefore, there is no fair value for this swap on the
consolidated balance sheet at September 30, 2009. The LLC made
payments under this swap arrangement for the three and nine month periods ended
September 30, 2009, totaling $670,000, and $1,941,000, respectively, and
for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2008, totaling $334,000
and $758,000, respectively. These payments were included in the amounts
capitalized as part of construction in progress through the end of
August 2008. After September 1, 2008 these amounts were included
in interest expense.
In
March 2008, the LLC, through its subsidiary, entered into a second interest
rate swap for a two-year period that has been designated as a hedge of cash
flows related to the interest payments on the underlying debt. The
contract is for $50.0 million principal with a fixed interest rate of 2.766%,
payable by the subsidiary and the variable interest rate, the one-month LIBOR,
payable by the third party. The difference between the subsidiary’s fixed
rate of 2.766% and the one-month LIBOR rate, which is reset every 30 days, is
received or paid every 30 days in arrears. The fair value of this swap
($619,000) has been recorded as a derivative financial instrument liability and
in accumulated other comprehensive income on the consolidated balance sheet at
September 30, 2009. The LLC made net payments under this swap
arrangement for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2009
totaling $318,000, and $900,000, respectively, and for the three and nine month
periods ended September 30, 2008 totaling $38,000 and $39,000,
respectively. These payments were included in the amounts capitalized
as part of construction in progress through the end of
August 2008. After September 1, 2008 these amounts were
included in interest expense.
16
During
the second quarter of 2008, the LLC entered into various derivative instruments
with Cargill in order to manage exposure to commodity prices for corn and
ethanol, generally through the use of futures, swaps, and option
contracts. During August 2008, the market price of corn declined
sharply, exposing the LLC to large losses and significant unmet margin calls
under those contracts. Cargill began liquidating the hedge contracts
in August 2008 and by September 30, 2008 the LLC was no longer a party
to any hedge contracts for any of its commodities. The Company
recorded $39.9 million in losses during the nine months ended September 30, 2008
resulting from the liquidation of its hedge contracts. As of
December 31, 2008, the LLC had converted its payable with Cargill relating
to its hedging contract losses into a note payable. See further
discussion of the Cargill Debt in Note 5 — Long Term Debt.
The
effects of derivative instruments on our consolidated financial statements were
as follows as of September 30, 2009 and for the three and nine months then
ended (amounts presented exclude any income tax effects and have not been
adjusted for the amount attributable to the noncontrolling
interest):
Fair
Value of Derivative Instruments in Consolidated Balance Sheet
September 30, 2009
|
||||||
(In thousands)
|
Balance Sheet
Location
|
Fair Value
|
||||
Cash flow hedges:
|
||||||
Interest
rate swap agreements designated as cash flow hedges
|
Current
portion of derivative financial instrument liability
|
$
|
(619
|
)
|
Effects
of Derivative Instruments on Income and Other Comprehensive Income
(Loss)
Amount of Gain
(Loss) recognized in
Accumulated OCI on
Derivative (effective
Portion)
|
Amount of Gain
(Loss) recognized
in Accumulated
OCI on Derivative
(effective Portion)
|
Amount and Location of Gain (Loss) Rec
lassified
from Accumulated OCI into Income (effective
Portion)
|
Amount and Location of Gain (Loss)
Recognized in Income on Derivative
(Ineffective Portion and Amount
Excluded from Effectiveness Testing)
|
|||||||||||||||
Three Months Ended
|
Nine Months Ended
|
Three Months Ended
|
Nine Months Ended
|
Three and Nine Months Ended
|
||||||||||||||
(In thousands)
|
September 30, 2009
|
September 30, 2009
|
September 30, 2009
|
September 30, 2009
|
September 30, 2009
|
|||||||||||||
Cash
flow hedges:
|
||||||||||||||||||
Interest
Rate Swaps
|
$
|
(141
|
)
|
$
|
(720
|
)
|
$
|
(988
|
)
|
$
|
(2,842
|
)
|
Interest
expense
|
$
|
—
|
Other
non-operating
income
|
Effective
January 1, 2008, the Company adopted the provisions of FASB ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and
Disclosures. FASB ASC 820 defines and establishes a
framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosures about fair value
measurements. In accordance with these provisions, we have
categorized our financial assets and liabilities, based on the priority of the
inputs to the valuation technique, into a three-level fair value hierarchy as
set forth below. If the inputs used to measure the financial
instruments fall within different levels of the hierarchy, the categorization is
based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value
measurement of the instrument.
Financial
assets and liabilities recorded on the Company’s consolidated balance sheets are
categorized based on the inputs to the valuation techniques as
follows:
Level 1 —
Financial assets and liabilities whose values are based on unadjusted quoted
prices for identical assets or liabilities in an active market that the company
has the ability to access at the measurement date. We currently do not have any
Level 1 financial assets or liabilities.
Level 2 —
Financial assets and liabilities whose values are based on quoted prices in
markets where trading occurs infrequently or whose values are based on quoted
prices of instruments with similar attributes in active
markets. Level 2 inputs include the following:
|
·
|
Quoted prices for identical or
similar assets or liabilities in non-active markets (examples include
corporate and municipal bonds which trade
infrequently);
|
|
·
|
Inputs other than quoted prices
that are observable for substantially the full term of the asset or
liability (examples include interest rate and currency swaps);
and
|
|
·
|
Inputs
that are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market
data for substantially the full term of the asset or liability (examples
include certain securities and
derivatives).
|
17
Level 3 —
Financial assets and liabilities whose values are based on prices or valuation
techniques that require inputs that are both unobservable and significant to the
overall fair value measurement. These inputs reflect management’s own
assumptions about the assumptions a market participant would use in pricing the
asset or liability. We currently do not have any Level 3 financial
assets or liabilities.
(in thousands)
|
September 30,
|
|||
Level 2
|
2009
|
|||
Financial
Liabilities:
|
||||
Interest
rate swaps
|
$
|
(619
|
)
|
|
Total
liabilities
|
$
|
(619
|
)
|
|
Total
net position
|
$
|
(619
|
)
|
The fair
value of our interest rate swaps are primarily based on the LIBOR
index.
9.
|
Stock-Based
Compensation
|
The
following table summarizes the stock based compensation incurred by the Company
and the LLC:
Three Months Ended,
|
Nine Months Ended,
|
|||||||||||||||
(In thousands)
|
September 30,
2009
|
September 30,
2008
|
September 30,
2009
|
September 30,
2008
|
||||||||||||
Stock options
|
$ | 64 | $ | — | $ | 190 | $ | 340 | ||||||||
Restricted
stock
|
3 | — | 94 | 181 | ||||||||||||
Total
|
$ | 67 | $ | — | $ | 284 | $ | 521 |
2007
Equity Incentive Compensation Plan
Immediately
prior to the Company’s initial public offering, the Company adopted the 2007
Equity Incentive Compensation Plan (“2007 Plan”). The 2007 Plan
provides for the grant of options intended to qualify as incentive stock
options, non-qualified stock options, stock appreciation rights or restricted
stock awards and any other equity-based or equity related awards. The
2007 Plan is administered by the Compensation Committee of the Board of
Directors. Subject to adjustment for changes in capitalization, the
aggregate number of shares that may be delivered pursuant to awards under the
2007 Plan is 3,000,000 and the term of the Plan is ten years, expiring in
June 2017.
Stock Options —
Except as otherwise directed by the Compensation Committee, the exercise price
for options cannot be less than the fair market value of our common stock on the
grant date. Other than the stock options issued to Directors, the
options will generally vest and become exercisable with respect to 30%, 30% and
40% of the shares of our common stock subject to such options on each of the
first three anniversaries of the grant date. Compensation expense
related to these options is expensed on a straight line basis over the 3 year
vesting period. Options issued to Directors generally vest and become
exercisable on the first anniversary of the grant date. All stock options have a
five year term from the date of grant.
During
the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, the Company issued 0
and 30,000 stock options, respectively under the 2007 Plan to certain of our
non-employee Directors with a per share exercise price equal to the market price
of the stock on the date of grant. During the three and nine months
ended September 30, 2008 the Company issued 0 and 299,025 stock options,
respectively, under the 2007 Plan to certain of our employees and non-employee
Directors with a per share exercise price equal to the market price of the stock
on the date of grant. The determination of the fair value of the
stock option awards, using the Black-Scholes model, incorporated the assumptions
in the following table for stock options granted during the three and nine
months ended September 30, 2009 and the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2008. The risk-free rate is based on the
U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant over the expected
term. Expected volatility is calculated by considering, among other
things, the expected volatilities of public companies engaged in the ethanol
industry. Due to the lack of historical experience in 2008, the
expected option term in 2008 is calculated using the “simplified”
method.
18
The
weighted average variables used in calculating fair value for options issued
during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 are as
follows:
Three Months Ended
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|||||||||||||||
September 30,
2009
|
September 30,
2008
|
September 30,
2009
|
September 30,
2008
|
|||||||||||||
Expected stock price volatility
|
n/a | % | n/a | % | 191 | % | 58 | % | ||||||||
Expected
life (in years)
|
n/a | n/a | 3.6 | 3.6 | ||||||||||||
Risk-free
interest rate
|
n/a | % | n/a | % | 2.16 | % | 2.70 | % | ||||||||
Expected
dividend yield
|
n/a | % | n/a | % | 0.00 | % | 0.00 | % | ||||||||
Expected
forfeiture rate
|
n/a | % | n/a | % | 35.00 | % | 35.00 | % | ||||||||
Weighted
average grant date fair value
|
$ | n/a | $ | n/a | $ | 0.68 | $ | 2.32 |
A summary
of the status of outstanding stock options at September 30, 2009 and the
changes during the nine months ended September 30, 2009 is as
follows:
Weighted
|
Weighted
|
Unrecognized
|
||||||||||||||||||
Average
|
Average
|
Aggregate
|
Remaining
|
|||||||||||||||||
Exercise
|
Remaining
|
Intrinsic
|
Compensation
|
|||||||||||||||||
Shares
|
Price
|
Life (years)
|
Value
|
Expense
|
||||||||||||||||
Options
outstanding, January 1, 2009
|
557,700 | $ | 7.75 | |||||||||||||||||
Granted
|
30,000 | 0.73 | ||||||||||||||||||
Exercised
|
— | — | ||||||||||||||||||
Forfeited
|
(256,570 | ) | 8.57 | |||||||||||||||||
Options
outstanding, September 30, 2009
|
331,130 | $ | 6.48 | 3.3 | $ | — | ||||||||||||||
Options
vested or expected to vest at September 30, 2009
|
278,339 | $ | 6.65 | 3.3 | $ | — | $ | 214,577 | ||||||||||||
Options
exercisable, September 30, 2009
|
163,194 | $ | 7.36 | 3.2 | $ | — |
Based on
the Company’s closing common stock price of $0.68 on September 30, 2009,
there was no intrinsic value related to any stock options
outstanding.
Restricted Stock - In
the nine months ended September 30, 2009, the Company granted 15,000 shares
to its non-employee directors. The shares vest 100% on the first
anniversary of the grant date.
A summary
of the restricted stock activity during the nine months ended September 30,
2009 is as follows:
Weighted
|
||||||||||||||||
Average
|
Unrecognized
|
|||||||||||||||
Grant Date
|
Aggregate
|
Remaining
|
||||||||||||||
Fair Value
|
Intrinsic
|
Compensation
|
||||||||||||||
Shares
|
per Award
|
Value
|
Expense
|
|||||||||||||
Restricted
stock outstanding, January 1, 2009
|
76,307 | $ | 8.32 | |||||||||||||
Granted
|
15,000 | 0.73 | ||||||||||||||
Vested
|
(31,787 | ) | 5.82 | |||||||||||||
Cancelled
or expired
|
(30,956 | ) | 9.94 | |||||||||||||
Restricted
stock outstanding, September 30, 2009
|
28,564 | $ | 5.37 | $ | 19,424 | |||||||||||
Restricted
stock expected to vest at September 30, 2009
|
19,635 | $ | 4.82 | $ | 13,352 | $ | 91,670 |
The
Company recorded $67,000 and $284,000 of non-cash compensation expense during
the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, respectively, relating
to stock options and restricted stock. During the three and nine
months ended September 30, 2008, the company recorded $352 and $521,000,
respectively, of non-cash compensation expense relating to stock options and
restricted stock. Compensation expense was determined based on the
fair value of each award type at the grant date and is recognized on a straight
line basis over their respective vesting periods. The remaining
unrecognized option and restricted stock expense will be recognized over 1.1 and
1.7 years, respectively. After considering the stock option and
restricted stock awards issued and outstanding, net of forfeitures, the Company
had 2,571,442 shares of common stock available for future grant under our 2007
Plan at September 30, 2009.
10.
|
Income
Taxes
|
The
Company has not recognized any income tax provision (benefit) for the three and
nine months ended September 30, 2009, and September 30,
2008. At September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the
Company recognized a tax receivable of $279,000 and $305,000, respectively,
related to expected tax refunds.
19
The U.S.
statutory federal income tax rate is reconciled to the Company’s effective
income tax rate as follows:
Three Months Ended,
|
Nine Months Ended,
|
|||||||||||||||
September 30,
2009
|
September 30,
2008
|
September 30,
2009
|
September 30,
2008
|
|||||||||||||
Statutory
U.S. federal income tax rate
|
(34.0 | )% | (34.0 | )% | (34.0 | )% | (34.0 | )% | ||||||||
Expected
state tax benefit, net
|
(3.6 | )% | (3.6 | )% | (3.6 | )% | (3.6 | )% | ||||||||
Valuation
allowance
|
37.6 | % | 37.6 | % | 37.6 | % | 37.6 | % | ||||||||
0.0 | % | 0.0 | % | 0.0 | % | 0.0 | % |
The
effects of temporary differences and other items that give rise to deferred tax
assets and liabilities are presented below (in thousands).
September 30,
|
December 31,
|
|||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
Deferred
tax assets:
|
||||||||
Capitalized
start up costs
|
$ | 4,016 | $ | 4,528 | ||||
Net
unrealized loss on derivatives
|
174 | 712 | ||||||
Net
operating loss carryover
|
41,697 | 20,993 | ||||||
Other
|
796 | 779 | ||||||
Deferred
tax asset
|
46,683 | 27,012 | ||||||
Valuation
allowance
|
(25,326 | ) | (18,412 | ) | ||||
Deferred
tax liabilities:
|
||||||||
Property,
plant and equipment
|
(21,357 | ) | (8,600 | ) | ||||
Deferred
tax liabilities
|
(21,357 | ) | (8,600 | ) | ||||
Net
deferred tax asset
|
$ | — | $ | — | ||||
Current
tax receivable
|
$ | 279 | $ | 305 | ||||
Increase
in valuation allowance
|
$ | 6,914 |
The
Company assesses the recoverability of deferred tax assets and the need for a
valuation allowance on an ongoing basis. In making this assessment,
management considers all available positive and negative evidence to determine
whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax
assets will be realized in future periods. This assessment requires
significant judgment and estimates involving current and deferred income taxes,
tax attributes relating to the interpretation of various tax laws, historical
bases of tax attributes associated with certain assets and limitations
surrounding the realization of deferred tax assets.
As of
September 30, 2009, the net operating loss carryforward is $111.0 million, which
will begin to expire if not used by December 31, 2028. The U.S.
federal statute of limitations remains open for our 2006 and subsequent tax
years.
11.
|
Employee
Benefit Plans
|
Deferred
Compensation Plan
The
Company maintains a deferred compensation plan. The plan is available
to executive officers of the Company and certain key managers of the Company as
designated by the Board of Directors or its Compensation Committee. The plan
allows participants to defer all or a portion of their salary and annual
bonuses. The Company may make discretionary matching contributions of
a percentage of the participant’s salary deferral and those assets are invested
in instruments as directed by the participant. The deferred
compensation plan does not have dollar limits on tax-deferred
contributions. The assets of the deferred compensation plan are held
in a “rabbi trust” and, therefore, may be available to satisfy the claims of the
Company’s creditors in the event of bankruptcy or
insolvency. Participants may direct the plan administrator to invest
their salary and bonus deferrals into pre-approved mutual funds held by the
trust or other investments approved by the Board. In addition, each
participant may request that the plan administrator re-allocate the portfolio of
investments in the participant’s individual account within the
trust. However, the plan administrator is not required to honor such
requests. Matching contributions, if any, will be made in cash and
vest ratably over a three-year period. Assets of the trust are
invested in over ten mutual funds that cover an investment spectrum ranging from
equities to money market instruments. These mutual funds are publicly
quoted and reported at market value. No funds were contributed to the
plan in the three or nine months ended September 30,
2009. Approximately $28,000 of employee deferrals was contributed to
the plan in the three and nine months ended September 30,
2008. These funds incurred a gain in value of $6,200, and $9,800 in
the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 and a loss in value of
$5,900 and $11,600 in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008,
respectively. These deferrals have been recorded as other assets and
other non-current liabilities on the consolidated balance sheet at September 30,
2009 and December 31, 2008.
20
401(k) Plan
The LLC
sponsors a 401(k) profit sharing and savings plan for its
employees. Employee participation in this plan is
voluntary. Contributions to the plan by the LLC are
discretionary. There were no contributions by the LLC to the plan for
the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 or 2008.
12.
|
Commitments
and Contingencies
|
The LLC,
through its subsidiaries, entered into two operating lease agreements with
Cargill. Cargill’s grain handling and storage facilities, located
adjacent to the Wood River and Fairmont plants, are being leased for 20 years,
which began in September 2008 for both plants. Minimum annual
payments are $800,000 for the Fairmont plant and $1,000,000 for the Wood River
plant so long as the associated corn supply agreements with Cargill remain in
effect. Should the Company not maintain its corn supply agreements
with Cargill, the minimum annual payments under each lease increase to
$1,200,000 and $1,500,000, respectively. The leases contain
escalation clauses which are based on the percentage change in the Midwest
Consumer Price Index. The escalation clauses are considered to be
contingent rent and, accordingly, are not included in minimum lease
payments. Rent expense is recognized on a straight line basis over
the terms of the leases. Events of default under the leases include
failure to fulfill monetary or non-monetary obligations and
insolvency. Effective September 1, 2009, the subsidiaries and Cargill
entered into Omnibus Agreements whereby the two operating lease agreements were
modified, for a period of one year, to defer a portion of the monthly lease
payments. The deferred lease payments will be payable to Cargill over
a two year period beginning September 1, 2010.
Subsidiaries
of the LLC entered into agreements to lease a total of 875 railroad
cars. Pursuant to these lease agreements, which began in the second
quarter of 2008, these subsidiaries will pay an average of approximately $7.4
million per year for ten years. Monthly rental charges escalate if
modifications of the cars are required by governmental authorities or mileage
exceeds 30,000 miles in any calendar year. Rent expense is recognized
on a straight line basis over the terms of the leases. Events of
default under the leases include failure to fulfill monetary or non-monetary
obligations and insolvency.
In
April 2008, the LLC entered into a five year lease that began July 1,
2008 for office space for its corporate headquarters. Rent expense is
being recognized on a straight line basis over the term of the
lease.
Future
minimum operating lease payments at September 30, 2009 are as follows (in
thousands):
Remainder
of 2009
|
$
|
1,776
|
||
2010
|
9,427
|
|||
2011
|
10,461
|
|||
2012
|
10,036
|
|||
2013
|
9,464
|
|||
Thereafter
|
58,536
|
|||
Total
|
$
|
99,700
|
Rent
expense recorded for the three and nine month periods ended September 30,
2009 totaled $2,366,000 and $7,080,000, respectively, and for the three and nine
month periods ended September 30, 2008 totaled $1,586,000 and $4,166,000,
respectively.
The LLC,
through its subsidiaries that constructed the Wood River and Fairmont plants,
has entered into agreements with electric utilities pursuant to which the
electric utilities built, own and operate substation and distribution facilities
in order to supply electricity to the plants. For its Wood River
plant, the LLC paid the utility $1.5 million for the cost of the substation and
distribution facility, which was recorded as property, plant and
equipment. The balance of the utilities direct capital costs is being
recovered from monthly demand charges of approximately $124,000 per month for
three years which began in the second quarter of 2008.
Subsidiaries
of the LLC entered into engineering, procurement and construction (“EPC”)
contracts with The Industrial Company — Wyoming (“TIC”) for the construction of
the Wood River and Fairmont plants. Pursuant to these EPC contracts,
TIC was to be paid a total of $272.0 million, subject to certain adjustments,
for the turnkey construction of the two plants. As part of the EPC
contracts, the subsidiaries of the LLC were permitted to withhold approximately
5% of progress payments billed by TIC as retainage, payable upon substantial
completion of the plants. The subsidiaries of the LLC entered into
settlement agreements with TIC, effective December 11, 2008, that settled
certain outstanding issues between the parties under the terms of the EPC
contracts. Among the items agreed to were that each plant had met
both substantial completion and project completion, that TIC would continue to
be responsible for its warranty obligations, and that TIC would pay the
subsidiaries of the LLC $2.0 million for each plant, which amounts would be
deducted from the retainage amounts owed to TIC. The construction
retainage in the consolidated balance sheets at December 31, 2008 of $9.4
million was recorded net of the $2.0 million for each plant owed by TIC as part
of the settlement agreement. The $9.4 million of construction
retainage was paid to TIC in February 2009. At
September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, property, plant and
equipment related to the EPC contracts totaled $248.9 million, which was
recorded net of liquidated damages of $19.1 million arising out of completion
delays at both plants and net of $4.0 million arising out of the settlement
agreements.
21
Pursuant
to long-term agreements, Cargill is the exclusive supplier of corn to the Wood
River and Fairmont plants for twenty years commencing
September 2008. The price of corn purchased under these
agreements is based on a formula including cost plus an origination fee of
$0.045 per bushel. The minimum annual origination fee payable to
Cargill per plant under the agreements is $1.2 million. The
agreements contain events of default that include failure to pay, willful
misconduct, purchase of corn from another supplier, insolvency or the
termination of the associated grain facility lease. Effective
September 1, 2009, the subsidiaries and Cargill entered into Omnibus Agreements
whereby the two corn supply agreements were modified, for a period of one year,
extending payment terms for our corn purchases which payment terms will revert
back to the original terms on September 1, 2010.
At
September 30, 2009, the LLC had committed, through its subsidiaries, to
purchase 879,000 bushels of corn to be delivered between October 2009 and
October 2010 at our Fairmont location, and 1,733,000 bushels of corn to be
delivered between October 2009 and March 2011 at our Wood River
location. These purchase commitments represent 2% and 3% of the
projected corn requirements during those periods for Fairmont and Wood River,
respectively. The purchase price of the corn will be determined at
the time of delivery. These normal purchase commitments are not
marked to market or recorded in the consolidated balance sheet.
Cargill
has agreed to market all ethanol and distillers grain produced at the Wood River
and Fairmont plants through September 2016. Under the terms of
the ethanol marketing agreements, the Wood River and Fairmont plants will
generally participate in a marketing pool where all parties receive the same net
price. That price will be the average delivered price per gallon
received by the marketing pool less average transportation and storage charges
and less a 1% commission. In certain circumstances, the plants may
elect not to participate in the marketing pool. Minimum annual
commissions are payable to Cargill and represent 1% of Cargill’s average selling
price for 82.5 million gallons of ethanol from each plant. Under the distillers
grain marketing agreements, the Wood River and Fairmont plants will receive the
market value at time of sale less a commission. Minimum annual commissions are
payable to Cargill and range from $500,000 to $700,000 depending upon certain
factors as specified in the agreement. The marketing agreements contain events
of default that include failure to pay, willful misconduct and
insolvency. Effective September 1, 2009, the subsidiaries and Cargill
entered into Omnibus Agreements whereby the two ethanol marketing agreements
were modified, for a period of one year, to defer a portion of the monthly
ethanol commission payments. The deferred commission payments will be
payable to Cargill over a two year period beginning September 1,
2010.
The
Company is not currently a party to any material legal, administrative or
regulatory proceedings that have arisen in the ordinary course of business or
otherwise that would result in loss contingencies.
13.
|
Noncontrolling
Interest
|
We have
retrospectively applied the presentation requirements of FASB ASC 810 in our
consolidated financial statements. Noncontrolling interest consists
of equity issued to members of the LLC. Under its original LLC
agreement, the LLC was authorized to issue 9,357,500 Class A, 950,000
Class B, 425,000 Class M, 2,683,125 Class C and 894,375
Class D Units. Class M, C and D Units were considered “profits
interests” for which no cash consideration was received upon issuance. In
accordance with the LLC agreement, all classes of the LLC’s equity units
were converted to one class of LLC equity upon the Company’s initial public
offering in June 2007. As provided in the LLC agreement, the exchange
ratio of the various existing classes of equity for the single class of equity
was based on the Company’s initial public offering price of $10.50 per share and
the resulting implied valuation of the Company. The exchange resulted in the
issuance of 17,957,896 LLC membership units and Class B common
shares. Each LLC membership unit combined with a share of
Class B common stock is exchangeable at the holder’s option into one share
of Company common stock. The LLC may make distributions to members as determined
by the Company.
Exchange
of LLC Units
LLC
membership units, when combined with the Class B shares, can be exchanged
for newly issued shares of common stock of the Company on a one-for-one
basis. The following table summarizes the exchange activity since the
Company’s initial public offering:
22
LLC
Membership Units and Class B common shares outstanding at
initial public offering, June 2007
|
17,957,896 | |||
LLC
Membership Units and Class B common shares exchanged in
2007
|
(561,210 | ) | ||
LLC
Membership Units and Class B common shares exchanged in
2008
|
(7,314,438 | ) | ||
LLC
Membership Units and Class B common shares exchanged in
2009
|
(1,932,817 | ) | ||
Remaining
LLC Membership Units and Class B shares at September 30,
2009
|
8,149,431 |
At the
time of its initial public offering, the Company owned 28.9% of the LLC
membership units of the LLC. At September 30, 2009, the Company owned 75.0%
of the LLC membership units. The noncontrolling interest will continue to be
reported until all Class B common shares and LLC membership units have been
exchanged into the Company’s common stock.
The
exchanges of LLC membership units for common stock prior to January 1, 2009
were accounted for as acquisitions of minority interests in accordance with FASB
ASC 805, Business
Combinations. Under FASB ASC 805, the common stock was
recorded based on the market value at the date of issuance while minority
interest was eliminated based on its book value at the date of the exchange with
any difference between these two amounts recorded as an adjustment of the
capitalized cost of long-lived assets. Beginning on
January 1, 2009, the Company adopted the provisions FASB ASC 810, whereby
all exchanges of LLC membership units for Company common stock will be accounted
for as equity transactions, with any difference between the fair value of the
Company’s common stock and the amount by which the noncontrolling interest is
adjusted being recognized in equity.
The table
below shows the effects of the changes in BioFuel Energy Corp.’s ownership
interest in LLC on the equity attributable to BioFuel Energy Corp.’s common
shareholders for the three and nine month periods ended September 30,
2009 and 2008 (in thousands):
Net
Loss Attributable to BioFuel Energy Corp.’s common
shareholders and
Transfers
(to) from the Noncontrolling Interest
Three Months Ended
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|||||||||||||||
September 30,
2009
|
September 30,
2008
|
September 30,
2009
|
September 30,
2008
|
|||||||||||||
Net
income (loss) attributable to BioFuel Energy Corp.’s common
shareholders
|
$ | (6,234 | ) | $ | (33,148 | ) | $ | (20,478 | ) | $ | (33,979 | ) | ||||
Transfers
(to) from the noncontrolling interest
|
||||||||||||||||
Increase
in BioFuel Energy Corp.’s paid-in capital for issuance of common
shares in exchange for Class B common shares and units of
BioFuel Energy, LLC
|
— | — | 1,794 | 360 | ||||||||||||
Net
transfers (to) from noncontrolling interest
|
— | — | 1,794 | 360 | ||||||||||||
Change
from net income (loss) attributable to BioFuel Energy Corp.’s common
shareholders and transfers (to) from noncontrolling
interest
|
$ | (6,234 | ) | $ | (33,148 | ) | $ | (18,684 | ) | $ | (33,619 | ) |
Tax Benefit Sharing
Agreement
Membership
units in the LLC combined with the related Class B common shares held by
the historical equity investors may be exchanged in the future for shares of our
common stock on a one-for-one basis, subject to customary conversion rate
adjustments for stock splits, stock dividends and
reclassifications. The LLC will make an election under
Section 754 of the IRS Code effective for each taxable year in which an
exchange of membership interests and Class B shares for common shares
occurs, which may result in an adjustment to the tax basis of the assets owned
by the LLC at the time of the exchange. Increases in tax basis, if
any, would reduce the amount of tax that the Company would otherwise be required
to pay in the future, although the IRS may challenge all or part of the tax
basis increases, and a court could sustain such a challenge. The Company has
entered into tax benefit sharing agreements with its historical LLC investors
that will provide for a sharing of these tax benefits, if any, between the
Company and the historical LLC equity investors. Under these agreements, the
Company will make a payment to an exchanging LLC member of 85% of the amount of
cash savings, if any, in U.S. federal, state and local income taxes the Company
actually realizes as a result of this increase in tax basis. The
Company and its common stockholders will benefit from the remaining 15% of cash
savings, if any, in income taxes realized. For purposes of the tax benefit
sharing agreement, cash savings in income tax will be computed by comparing the
Company’s actual income tax liability to the amount of such taxes the Company
would have been required to pay had there been no increase in the tax basis in
the assets of the LLC as a result of the exchanges. The term of the
tax benefit sharing agreement commenced on the Company’s initial public offering
in June 2007 and will continue until all such tax benefits have been
utilized or expired, unless a change of control occurs and the Company exercises
its resulting right to terminate the tax benefit sharing agreement for an amount
based on agreed payments remaining to be made under the
agreement.
23
True
Up Agreement
At the
time of formation of the LLC, the founders agreed with certain of our principal
stockholders as to the relative ownership interests in the Company of our
management members and affiliates of Greenlight Capital, Inc.
(“Greenlight”) and Third Point LLC (“Third Point”). Certain management
members and affiliates of Greenlight and Third Point agreed to exchange LLC
membership interests, shares of common stock or cash at a future date, referred
to as the “true-up date”, depending on the Company’s performance. This provision
functions by providing management with additional value if the Company’s value
improves and by reducing management’s interest in the Company if its value
decreases, subject to a predetermined rate of return accruing to Greenlight and
Third Point. In particular, if the value of the Company increases from the time
of the initial public offering to the “true-up date”, the management members
will be entitled to receive LLC membership units, shares of common stock or cash
from the affiliates of Greenlight and Third Point. On the other hand, if the
value of the Company decreases from the time of the initial public offering to
the “true-up date” or if a predetermined rate of return is not met, the
affiliates of Greenlight and Third Point will be entitled to receive LLC
membership units or shares of common stock from the management
members.
The
“true-up date” will be the earlier of (1) the date on which the Greenlight
and Third Point affiliates sell a number of shares of our common stock equal to
or greater than the number of shares of common stock or Class B common
stock received by them at the time of our initial public offering in respect of
their original investment in the LLC, and (2) five years from the date of
the initial public offering which is June 2012. On the “true-up
date”, the LLC’s value will be determined, based on the prices at which the
Greenlight and Third Point affiliates sold shares of our common stock prior to
that date, with any remaining shares (or LLC membership units exchangeable for
shares) held by them deemed to have been sold at the then-current trading price.
If the number of LLC membership units held by the management members at the time
of the offering is greater than the number of LLC membership units the
management members would have been entitled to in connection with the “true-up”
valuation, the management members will be obligated to deliver to the Greenlight
and Third Point affiliates a portion of their LLC membership units or an
equivalent number of shares of common stock. Conversely, if the number of LLC
membership units the management members held at the time of the offering is less
than the number of LLC membership units the management members would have been
entitled to in connection with the “true-up” valuation, the Greenlight and Third
Point affiliates will be obligated to deliver, at their option, to the
management members a portion of their LLC membership interests or an equivalent
amount of cash or shares of common stock. In no event will any management member
be required to deliver more than 50% of the membership units in the LLC, or an
equivalent number of shares of common stock, held on the date of the initial
public offering, provided that Mr. Thomas J. Edelman may be required
to deliver up to 100% of his LLC membership units, or an equivalent amount of
cash or number of shares of common stock. No new shares will be issued as a
result of the true-up. As a result there will be no impact on our public
shareholders, but rather a redistribution of shares among certain members of our
management group and our two largest investors, Greenlight and Third Point. This
agreement was considered a modification of the awards granted to the
participating management members; however, no incremental fair value was created
as a result of the modification.
ITEM
2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS
You
should read the following discussion in conjunction with the unaudited
consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes included in this
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. This discussion contains forward-looking
statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Specifically, forward-looking
statements may be preceded by, followed by or may include such words as
“estimate”, “plan”, “project”, “forecast”, “intend”, “expect”, “is to be”,
“anticipate”, “goal”, “believe”, “seek”, “target” or other similar
expressions. You are cautioned not to place undue reliance on any
forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this
Form 10-Q, or in the case of a document incorporated by reference, as of
the date of that document. Except as required by law, we undertake no obligation
to publicly update or release any revisions to these forward-looking statements
to reflect any events or circumstances after the date of this Form 10-Q or
to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events. Our actual results
may differ materially from those discussed in or implied by any of the
forward-looking statements as a result of various factors, including but not
limited to those listed elsewhere in this Form 10-Q and those listed in our
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 or in
other documents we have filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission.
Overview
BioFuel
Energy Corp. produces and sells ethanol and distillers grain through its two
ethanol production facilities located in Wood River, Nebraska and Fairmont,
Minnesota. In late June 2008, we commenced start-up of
commercial operations and began to produce ethanol at both of our plants, each
having a nameplate capacity of 115 million gallons per year (“Mmgy”), based on
the maximum amount of permitted denaturant. During the remainder of
2008, we focused on optimizing production and streamlining operations with the
goal of producing at nameplate capacity, which was achieved in
December 2008. From inception, we have worked closely with
Cargill, Inc., one of the world’s leading agribusiness companies and a
related party, with whom we have an extensive contractual
relationship. The two plant locations were selected primarily based
on access to corn supplies, the availability of rail transportation and natural
gas and Cargill’s competitive position in the area. At each location,
Cargill, has a strong local presence and owns adjacent grain storage
facilities. Cargill provides corn procurement services, markets the
ethanol and distillers grain we produce and provides transportation logistics
for our two plants under long-term contracts. In addition, we lease
grain storage and handling facilities adjacent to our plants from affiliates of
Cargill.
24
Our
operations and cash flows are subject to fluctuations due to changes in
commodity prices. We may attempt to use derivative financial
instruments such as futures contracts, swaps and option contracts to manage
commodity prices in the future, although sufficient financial resources may not
be available to us and opportunities to sell ethanol for future delivery may be
significantly limited. See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Liquidity and capital
resources;—Cargill debt agreement,” and “Quantitative and Qualitative
Disclosures about Market Risk,” elsewhere in this report.
We are a
holding company with no operations of our own, and are the sole managing member
of BioFuel Energy, LLC, or the LLC, which is itself a holding company and
indirectly owns all of our operating assets. The Company’s ethanol
plants are owned and operated by the Operating Subsidiaries of the
LLC.
At
September 30, 2009, the Company owned 75.0% of the LLC and the remainder
was owned by our founders and some of our original equity investors. As a
result, the Company consolidates the results of the LLC. The amount of income or
loss allocable to the 25.0% holders is reported as noncontrolling interest in
our Consolidated Statements of Operations. The Class B common
shares of the Company are held by the historical equity investors of the LLC,
who held 8,149,431 membership interests in the LLC that, together with the
corresponding Class B shares, can be exchanged for newly issued shares of
common stock of the Company on a one-for-one basis. As of December
31, 2008, the unit holders owned 10,082,248 membership units, or 30.9% of the
membership interests in the LLC. During the nine months ended
September 30, 2009, unit holders exchanged 1,932,817 membership units in the LLC
(together with the corresponding shares of Class B common stock) for shares of
our common stock, substantially all of which are eligible for sale under Rule
144 promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933 upon lapse of a six-month
holding period.
The
Operating Subsidiaries, entered into engineering, procurement and construction,
or EPC contracts with The Industrial Company — Wyoming, or TIC, for the turnkey
construction of the Wood River and Fairmont plants. The Operating
Subsidiaries of the LLC entered into agreements with TIC, effective
December 11, 2008, that settled certain issues that had arisen between the
parties under the terms of the EPC contracts during the course of constructing
the plants. Among the items agreed to were that each plant had met
both substantial completion and project completion, that TIC would continue to
be responsible for its warranty obligations, and that TIC would pay the
subsidiaries of the LLC $2.0 million for each plant, which amounts would be
deducted from the retainage amounts owed to TIC. At
September 30, 2009, property, plant and equipment related to the EPC
contracts was $248.9 million, which was recorded net of liquidated damages of
$19.1 million arising out of completion delays at both plants and net of $4.0
million arising out of the settlement agreements.
Going
Concern and Liquidity Considerations
The
accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in conformity
with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America,
which contemplate our continuation as a going concern. Our results of
operations and financial condition depend substantially on the price of our main
commodity input, corn, relative to the price of our main commodity product,
ethanol, which is known in the industry as the “crush spread”. The
prices of these commodities are volatile and beyond our control. As shown in the
accompanying consolidated financial statements, the Company incurred a net loss
of $8.4 million and $28.5 million during the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2009, respectively, primarily resulting from poor operating
margins due to unfavorable crush spreads and operating issues in addition to
increased legal, financial advisory, and interest expenses associated with the
Company’s negotiations with its lenders relating to restructuring and loan
conversion.
Certain
subsidiaries of the LLC, or the Operating Subsidiaries, received a Notice of
Default dated May 22, 2009 from its lenders under the senior secured credit
facility, the Senior Debt facility, asserting that a “material adverse effect”
had occurred. The Company disagreed with the lenders assertion that a
material adverse effect had occurred and, beginning on May 28, 2009, entered
into a series of consent agreements with its lenders granting the Operating
Subsidiaries limited access to its bank accounts as it continued discussions
with the lenders relating to the asserted events of default and conversion of
the construction loans to term loans. Effective September 29, 2009,
the Operating Subsidiaries entered into a Waiver and Amendment to the Senior
Debt which converted the two construction loans to two term loans and waived all
defaults previously asserted by the lenders. At conversion, the
Waiver and Amendment to the Senior Debt provided for $198.6 million of total
funded debt under the term loans. Following the conversion, the
Operating Subsidiaries made their first principal payment on September 30, 2009
of $3.2 million which resulted in $195.4 million in term loans outstanding as of
September 30, 2009. The Waiver and Amendment to the Senior Debt also
provides for up to $9.7 million in additional loans to make future principal and
interest payments under the Senior Debt facility.
25
Although
we have come to a resolution with the lenders concerning our Senior Debt
facility and losses have narrowed in the third quarter as a result of crush
spreads steadily improving throughout the year to date, we cannot predict when
or if crush spreads will narrow again or if current or more favorable margins
will continue. In the event crush spreads narrow further, and remain
at unprofitable levels for an extended period of time, we may not be able to
generate sufficient cash flow to meet our obligations and sustain our
operations. In
addition, we have had, and continue to have, severely limited liquidity, with
$8.2 million in cash on hand as of September 30, 2009. If we do not
have sufficient cash flow to service our debt, we would need to refinance all or
part of our existing debt, sell assets, borrow more money or sell securities,
any or all of which we may not be able to do on commercially reasonable terms or
at all. If we are unable to do so, we may be required to curtail
operations or cease operating altogether.
Revenues
Our
primary source of revenue is the sale of ethanol. The selling prices
we realize for our ethanol are largely determined by the market supply and
demand for ethanol, which, in turn, is influenced by industry factors over which
we have little control. Ethanol prices are extremely volatile.
We also
receive revenue from the sale of distillers grain, which is a residual
co-product of the processed corn used in the production of ethanol and is sold
as animal feed. The selling prices we realize for our distillers grain are
largely determined by the market supply and demand, primarily from livestock
operators and marketing companies in the U.S. and
internationally. Distillers grain is sold by the ton and, based upon
the amount of moisture retained in the product, can either be sold “wet” or
“dry”.
Cost
of goods sold and gross income (loss)
Our gross
income (loss) is derived from our revenues less our cost of goods sold. Our cost
of goods sold is affected primarily by the cost of corn and natural gas. The
prices of both corn and natural gas are volatile and can vary as a result of a
wide variety of factors, including weather, market demand, regulation and
general economic conditions, all of which are outside of our
control.
Corn is
our most significant raw material cost. Historically, rising corn
prices result in lower profit margins because ethanol producers are unable to
pass along increased corn costs to customers. The price and availability of corn
is influenced by weather conditions and other factors affecting crop yields,
farmer planting decisions and general economic, market and regulatory factors.
These factors include government policies and subsidies with respect to
agriculture and international trade, and global and local demand and supply for
corn and for other agricultural commodities for which it may be substituted,
such as soybeans. Historically, the spot price of corn tends to rise during the
spring planting season in May and June and tends to decrease during
the fall harvest in October and November.
We also
purchase natural gas to power steam generation in our ethanol production process
and as fuel for our dryers to dry our distillers grain. Natural gas represents
our second largest operating cost after corn, and natural gas prices are
extremely volatile. Historically, the spot price of natural gas tends to be
highest during the heating and cooling seasons and tends to decrease during the
spring and fall.
Corn
procurement fees paid to Cargill are included in our cost of goods sold. Other
cost of goods sold primarily consists of our cost of chemicals and enzymes,
electricity, depreciation, manufacturing overhead and rail car lease
expenses.
General
and administrative expenses
General
and administrative expenses consist of salaries and benefits paid to our
management and administrative employees, expenses relating to third party
services, insurance, travel, office rent, marketing and other expenses,
including certain expenses associated with being a public company, such as costs
associated with our annual audit and quarterly reviews, compliance with
Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, and listing and transfer agent
fees. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009,
significant third
party legal and financial advisory expenses were incurred associated
with the Company’s negotiations with its lenders relating to
restructuring and loan conversion.
Results
of operations
The
following discussion summarizes the significant factors affecting the
consolidated operating results of the Company for the three and nine months
ended September 30, 2009 and 2008. This discussion should be read in
conjunction with the unaudited consolidated financial statements and notes to
the unaudited consolidated financial statements contained in this
Form 10-Q.
26
The
following table sets forth net sales, expenses and net loss, as well as the
percentage relationship to net sales of certain items in our consolidated
statements of operations:
Three Months Ended
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
September 30,
|
September 30,
|
September 30,
|
September 30,
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(unaudited)
|
(unaudited)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands)
|
(dollars in thousands)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net
sales
|
$ | 91,138 | 100.0 | % | $ | 90,549 | 100.0 | % | $ | 295,096 | 100.0 | % | $ | 90,841 | 100.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Cost
of goods sold
|
89,039 | 97.7 | 103,765 | 114.6 | 298,911 | 101.3 | 104,021 | 114.5 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gross
income (loss)
|
2,099 | 2.3 | (13,216 | ) | (14.6 | ) | (3,815 | ) | (1.3 | ) | (13,180 | ) | (14.5 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
General
and administrative expenses
|
5,737 | 6.3 | 2,468 | 2.7 | 12,611 | 4.3 | 14,968 | 16.5 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other
operating expense
|
150 | 0.2 | 1,345 | 1.5 | 150 | 0.0 | 1,345 | 1.5 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating
loss
|
(3,788 | ) | (4.2 | ) | (17,029 | ) | (18.8 | ) | (16,576 | ) | (5.6 | ) | (29,493 | ) | (32.5 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Other
income (expense), net
|
(4,585 | ) | (5.0 | ) | (53,612 | ) | (59.2 | ) | (11,963 | ) | (4.1 | ) | (42,342 | ) | (46.6 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Net
loss
|
(8,373 | ) | (9.2 | ) | (70,641 | ) | (78.0 | ) | (28,539 | ) | (9.7 | ) | (71,835 | ) | (79.1 | ) |
The
following table sets forth key operational data for the three and nine months
ended September 30, 2009 and the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2008 that we believe are important indicators of our results
of operations:
Three Months Ended
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|||||||||||||||
September 30,
2009
|
September 30,
2008
|
September 30,
2009
|
September 30,
2008
|
|||||||||||||
(unaudited)
|
(unaudited)
|
(unaudited)
|
(unaudited)
|
|||||||||||||
Ethanol sold (gallons, in thousands)
|
51,557 | 35,599 | 162,568 | 35,599 | ||||||||||||
Dry
distillers grains sold (tons, in thousands)
|
117.3 | 68.7 | 360.8 | 68.7 | ||||||||||||
Wet
distillers grains sold (tons, in thousands)
|
84.3 | 83.4 | 283.1 | 89.9 | ||||||||||||
Average
price of ethanol sold (per gallon)
|
$ | 1.56 | $ | 2.20 | $ | 1.54 | $ | 2.20 | ||||||||
Average
price of dry distillers grains sold (per ton)
|
$ | 84.25 | $ | 149.22 | $ | 108.05 | $ | 149.22 | ||||||||
Average
price of wet distillers grains sold (per ton)
|
$ | 23.08 | $ | 38.99 | $ | 34.34 | $ | 39.63 | ||||||||
Average
corn cost (per bushel)
|
$ | 3.14 | $ | 5.36 | $ | 3.58 | $ | 5.45 |
Three
Months Ended September 30, 2009 Compared to the Three Months Ended
September 30, 2008
Net Sales: Net
Sales were $91,138,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2009
compared to $90,549,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2008 or an
increase of $589,000. This was due to an increase in volumes of
ethanol and distillers grains sold offset by a decline in the price of ethanol
and distillers grains.
Cost of goods sold and gross income
(loss): Cost of goods sold was $89,039,000 for the three
months ended September 30, 2009 which resulted in gross income of
$2,099,000 for the period. Cost of goods sold for the three months
ended September 30, 2009 included $60,456,000 for corn, $5,359,000 for natural
gas, $1,817,000 for denaturant, $3,300,000 for electricity, $3,528,000 for
chemicals and enzymes, $8,219,000 for general operating expenses, and $6,360,000
for depreciation. Cost of goods sold was $103,765,000 for the three
months ended September 30, 2008 which resulted in a gross loss of $13,216,000
for the three months ended September 30, 2008. Cost of goods sold for
the three months ended September 30, 2008 included $74,442,000 for corn,
$11,551,000 for natural gas, $2,103,000 for denaturant, $2,793,000 for
electricity, $4,906,000 for chemicals and enzymes, $5,645,000 for general
operating expenses, and $2,325,000 for depreciation. Our cost of
goods sold was higher than expected in the three months ended September 30, 2008
due to the delay in having our plants up and running at capacity, which resulted
in inefficiencies in all cost categories, except depreciation
expense.
General and administrative
expenses: General and administrative expenses increased
$3,269,000 or 132.5%, to $5,737,000 for the three months ended
September 30, 2009, compared to $2,468,000 for the three months ended
September 30, 2008. The increase was due to an increase of
$352,000 in compensation costs and an increase of $2,917,000 in other
expenses. Other expenses for the three months ended
September 30, 2009 included $3,205,000 of third party legal and financial
advisory expenses, primarily related to the Company’s negotiations with the
lenders under the Senior Debt facility concerning restructuring and loan
conversion.
Other operating
expense: Other operating expense decreased $1,195,000 or
88.8%, to $150,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2009, compared
to $1,345,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2008. The
expense for the three months ended September 30, 2009 consisted of a $150,000
insurance claim deductible expense. The expense for the three months
ended September 30, 2008 consisted of a $250,000 insurance claim deductible
expense and a $1,095,000 write off of development costs associated with the
evaluation of three additional plant sites.
27
Other income
(expense): Interest income decreased $122,000, or 90.4%, to
$13,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2009, compared to $135,000
for the three months ended September 30, 2008. The decrease was
primarily attributable to a decrease in the amount of funds invested in money
market mutual funds during the period.
Interest
expense was $4,598,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2009,
compared to $1,632,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2008, or an
increase of $2,966,000. The increase is a result of the Company no
longer capitalizing interest associated with the loans financing construction of
the plants effective September 1, 2008. The amount represents
one month of interest expense on such loans during the three months ended
September 30, 2008, compared to three months of expense in the three months
ended September 30, 2009. Interest expense was approximately
$1,050,000 higher than expected for the three months ended September 30,
2009, as a result of the Notice of Default issued by the lenders under the
Senior Debt facility, following which the lenders caused the construction loans
and working capital loans to revert to base rate loans effective June 1, 2009,
carrying a higher interest rate. Effective October 1, 2009, the term
loans and working capital loans under the Senior Debt facility were converted
back to LIBOR-based loans carrying a lower interest rate.
Other
non-operating expense was zero for the three months ended September 30,
2009, compared to $2,123,000 for the three months ended September 30,
2008. The loss in the three months ended September 30, 2008 consisted
of a $2,165,000 loss on the sale of corn, which was offset by $42,000 of other
miscellaneous income.
Loss on
derivative financial instruments was zero for the three months ended
September 30, 2009, compared to $49,992,000 for the three months ended
September 30, 2008. The loss in 2008 was a result of the Company
realizing losses associated with commodities hedging contracts during the
period. The Company was not a party to any such derivative financial
instruments during the three months ended September 30, 2009.
Noncontrolling
Interest. The net loss attributable to the noncontrolling
interest decreased $35,354,000 to $2,139,000 for the three months ended
September 30, 2009, compared to $37,493,000 for the three months ended
September 30, 2008. The decrease was attributable to the
Company’s net loss decreasing from $70,641,000 for the three months ended
September 30, 2008 to $8,373,000 for the three months ended
September 30, 2009, as well as the decrease in the percentage ownership of
the noncontrolling interest from 53.1% at September 30, 2008 to 25.0% at
September 30, 2009.
Nine
Months Ended September 30, 2009 Compared to the Nine Months Ended
September 30, 2008
Both of
the Company’s plants commenced start-up and began commercial operations in late
June 2008. Because of this, we reported only three months of net
sales, cost of goods sold, or gross profit (loss) for the nine months ended
September 30, 2008 for comparison purposes.
Net Sales: Net
Sales were $295,096,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2009
compared to $90,841,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 or an
increase of $204,255,000. This was due to only three months of
operations in the nine months ended September 30, 2008, compared to nine full
months of operations in the period ended September 30, 2009.
Cost of goods sold and gross
loss: Cost of goods sold was $298,911,000 for the nine months
ended September 30, 2009 which resulted in a gross loss of
$3,815,000. Cost of goods sold included $211,736,000 for corn,
$18,493,000 for natural gas, $4,934,000 for denaturant, $9,293,000 for
electricity, $12,677,000 for chemicals and enzymes, $22,868,000 for general
operating expenses, and $18,910,000 for depreciation. Our cost of
goods sold was high in relation to revenues primarily due to the cost of corn
per gallon of ethanol being greater than it historically has been, resulting in
a narrowed crush spread. Cost of goods sold was $104,021,000 for the
nine months ended September 30, 2008 which resulted in a gross loss of
$13,180,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2008. Cost of
goods sold included $74,701,000 for corn, $11,687,000 for natural gas,
$2,152,000 for denaturant, $2,802,000 for electricity, $5,416,000 for chemicals
and enzymes, $4,938,000 for general operating expenses, and $2,325,000 for
depreciation. Our cost of goods sold during the period ended
September 30, 2008 was higher than expected due to the delay in having our
plants up and running at capacity, which resulted in inefficiencies in all cost
categories, except depreciation expense.
General and administrative
expenses: General and administrative expenses decreased
$2,357,000 or 15.7%, to $12,611,000 for the nine months ended September 30,
2009, compared to $14,968,000 for the nine months ended September 30,
2008. The decrease was primarily due to a decrease in compensation
expense of $2,009,000 and other expense of $348,000. Of the
$2,009,000 decrease in compensation expense, $1,328,000 was attributable to
plant employees who began working and training at the plants in early
2008. As the plants did not begin commercial operation until June
2008, the plant employees’ compensation costs were included in selling, general
and administrative expenses until that time while the plant employees’ costs are
included in cost of goods sold for the nine months ended September 30,
2009. Of the $348,000 decrease in other expense, $4,854,000 was
attributable to an increase in third party legal and financial advisory
expenses, primarily related to the Company’s negotiations with the lenders under
the Senior Debt facility concerning restructuring and loan conversion expenses
relating to the plants, which was offset by a decrease in other general and
administrative expenses of $5,202,000. Of the $5,202,000 decrease in
other expenses, $4,223,000 was attributable to expenses related to the
plants. As the plants did not begin commercial operation until
June 2008, all start-up costs were included in general and administrative
expenses until that time. Subsequent to June 2008, plant costs
are now included in cost of goods sold.
28
Other operating
expense: Other operating expense decreased $1,195,000 or
88.8%, to $150,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2009, compared
to $1,345,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2008. The
expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 consisted of a $150,000
insurance claim deductible expense. The expense for the nine months
ended September 30, 2008 consisted of a $250,000 insurance claim deductible
expense and a $1,095,000 write off of development costs associated with the
evaluation of three additional plant sites.
Other income
(expense): Interest income decreased $913,000 or 92.5%, to
$74,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2009, compared to $987,000
for the nine months ended September 30, 2008. The decrease was
primarily attributable to a decrease in the amount of funds available to be
invested in money market mutual funds as a result of the Company having to fund
operating losses with its existing cash balances.
Interest
expense was $12,036,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2009,
compared to $1,632,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2008, as a
result of the Company no longer capitalizing interest associated with the loans
financing the construction of the plants effective September 1,
2008. The amount represents one month of interest expense on such
loans during the nine months ended September 30, 2008, compared to nine months
of expense in the nine months ended September 30, 2009. Interest
expense was approximately $1,400,000 higher than expected for the nine months
ended September 30, 2009, as a result of the Notice of Default issued by
the lenders under the Senior Debt facility, following which the lenders caused
the construction loans and working capital loans to revert to base rate loans
effective June 1, 2009, carrying a higher interest rate. Effective
October 1, 2009, the term loans and working capital loans under the Senior Debt
facility were converted back to LIBOR-based loans carrying a lower interest
rate.
Other
non-operating expense was $1,000 for the nine months ended September 30,
2009 compared to $1,785,000 for the nine months ended September 30,
2008. The loss in 2008 consisted of a $1,879,000 loss on the sale of
corn which was offset by $94,000 of other miscellaneous income.
Loss
on derivative financial instruments was zero for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009, compared to $39,912,000 for the nine months ended
September 30, 2008. The loss in 2008 was a result of the Company
incurring losses associated with commodities hedging contracts during the
period. The Company was not a party to any such hedging contracts
during the nine months ended September 30, 2009.
Noncontrolling
Interest. The net loss attributable to the noncontrolling
interest decreased $29,795,000 to $8,061,000 for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009, compared to $37,856,000 for the nine months ended
September 30, 2008. The decrease was attributable to the
Company’s net loss decreasing from $71,835,000 for the nine months ended
September 30, 2008 to $28,539,000 for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009, as well as the decrease in the percentage ownership of
the noncontrolling interest from 53.1% at September 30, 2008 to 25.0% at
September 30, 2009.
Liquidity
and capital resources
Our cash
flows from operating, investing and financing activities during the nine month
periods ended September 30, 2009 and September 30, 2008 are summarized
below (in thousands):
For the
|
For the
|
|||||||
Nine Months Ended
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|||||||
September 30, 2009
|
September 30, 2008
|
|||||||
Cash
provided by (used in):
|
||||||||
Operating
activities
|
$ | (10,694 | ) | $ | (74,542 | ) | ||
Investing
activities
|
(10,111 | ) | (43,819 | ) | ||||
Financing
activities
|
16,673 | 82,015 | ||||||
Net
decrease in cash and equivalents
|
$ | (4,132 | ) | $ | (36,346 | ) |
29
Cash used in operating activities.
Net cash used in operating activities was $10,694,000 for the nine months
ended September 30, 2009, compared to $74,542,000 for the nine months ended
September 30, 2008. For the nine months ended September 30,
2009, the amount was primarily comprised of a net loss of $28,539,000 and
working capital uses of $3,427,000 which were offset by non-cash charges,
primarily depreciation and amortization, of $21,272,000. Working capital uses
primarily related to decreases in accounts payable and other current liabilities
offset by decreases in accounts receivable and inventory. For the
nine months ended September 30, 2008, the amount was primarily comprised of
a net loss of $71,835,000, and working capital uses of $6,885,000, which were
offset by non-cash charges, primarily depreciation and amortization and loss on
disposal of assets, of $4,178,000. Working capital uses mostly related to an
increase in accounts receivable of $18,727,000 and an increase in inventory of
$17,066,000 offset by an increase in accounts payable of
$26,448,000.
Cash used in investing
activities. Net cash used in investing activities was
$10,111,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2009, compared to
$43,819,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2008. The
cash used during the nine months ended September 30, 2009 was primarily for
payment of the construction retainage on the Wood River and Fairmont ethanol
plants, while during the nine months ended September 30, 2008 the cash used
was primarily for capital expenditures related to the construction of the Wood
River and Fairmont ethanol plants. The decrease between the nine
months ended September 30, 2008 and 2009 was a result of the construction
being largely completed by the end of 2008, with only minor construction
projects being completed in 2009.
Cash provided by financing
activities. Net cash provided by financing activities was
$16,673,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2009, compared to
$82,015,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2008. For
the nine months ended September 30, 2009 the amount was primarily comprised
of $3,000,000 of borrowings under the Company’s working capital facility and
$17,387,000 of proceeds under its term (formerly construction) loan facilities,
which were offset by $1,233,000 in payments of Subordinated Debt and $3,150,000
in payments of the Senior Debt. For the nine months ended
September 30, 2008 the amount was primarily comprised of $10,000,000 of
borrowings under the Company’s working capital facility and $75,500,000 in
borrowings under the Company’s construction facilities offset by $2,276,000 in
payments for treasury stock purchases.
Our
principal sources of liquidity at September 30, 2009 consisted of cash and
equivalents, working capital generated from operations, and available borrowings
under our bank facilities as summarized in the following table (in
thousands).
September 30,
2009
|
||||
Cash
and equivalents
|
$
|
8,167
|
||
Working
capital
|
(2,214)
|
(1)
|
||
Debt
Service Reserve loan commitment availability
|
9,743
|
(1)
Includes $20.0 million working capital loan maturing in September
2010
Our
principal liquidity needs are expected to be funding our operations, funding
project costs, debt service requirements of our indebtedness, and general
corporate purposes. Our Debt Service Reserve availability can only be
utilized to fund principal and interest payments under our Senior Debt
facility.
Stock
repurchase plan
On
October 15, 2007, the Company announced the adoption of a stock repurchase
plan pursuant to which the repurchase of up to $7.5 million of the
Company’s common stock was authorized. Purchases were funded out of cash on hand
and made from time to time in the open market. From the inception of
the buyback program through September 30, 2009, the Company had repurchased
809,606 shares at an average price of $5.30 per share, leaving $3,184,000
available under the repurchase plan. The shares repurchased are held
as treasury stock. As of September 30, 2009, there were no plans
to repurchase any additional shares.
Tax
and our tax benefit sharing agreement
As a
result of future exchanges of membership interests in the LLC for shares of our
common stock, the tax basis of the LLC’s assets attributable to our interest in
the LLC may be increased. These increases in tax basis, if any, will result in a
potential tax benefit to the Company that would not have been available but for
the exchanges of the LLC membership interests for shares of our common stock.
These increases in tax basis would reduce the amount of tax that we would
otherwise be required to pay in the future, although the IRS may challenge all
or part of the tax basis increases, and a court could sustain such a challenge.
There have been no assets recognized with respect to any exchanges made through
September 30, 2009. The amount of any potential increases in tax basis and
the resulting recording of tax assets are dependent upon the share price of our
common stock at the time of the exchange of the membership interests in the LLC
for shares of our common stock. At the current trading price, which
was $1.45
as of November
9, 2009, we do not anticipate any material change in the tax basis
of the LLC’s assets.
30
We have
entered into a tax benefit sharing agreement with our historical LLC equity
investors that will provide for a sharing of these tax benefits, if any, between
the Company and the historical LLC equity investors. Under this agreement, the
Company will make a payment to an exchanging LLC member of 85% of the amount of
cash savings, if any, in U.S. federal, state and local income tax that we
actually realize as a result of this increase in tax basis. The Company and its
common stockholders will benefit from the remaining 15% of cash savings, if any,
in income tax that is realized by the Company. For purposes of the tax benefit
sharing agreement, cash savings in income tax will be computed by comparing our
actual income tax liability to the amount of such taxes that we would have been
required to pay had there been no increase in the tax basis of the tangible and
intangible assets of the LLC as a result of the exchanges and had we not entered
into the tax benefit sharing agreement. The term of the tax benefit sharing
agreement will continue until all such tax benefits have been utilized or
expired, unless a change of control occurs and we exercise our resulting right
to terminate the tax benefit sharing agreement for an amount based on agreed
payments remaining to be made under the agreement.
Although
we are not aware of any issue that would cause the IRS to challenge a tax basis
increase, our historical LLC equity investors are not required to reimburse us
for any payments previously made under the tax benefit sharing agreement. As a
result, in certain circumstances we could make payments to our historical LLC
equity investors under the tax benefit sharing agreement in excess of our cash
tax savings. Our historical LLC equity investors will receive 85% of our cash
tax savings, leaving us with 15% of the benefits of the tax savings. The actual
amount and timing of any payments under the tax benefit sharing agreement will
vary depending upon a number of factors, including the timing of exchanges, the
extent to which such exchanges are taxable, the price of our common stock at the
time of the exchange and the amount and timing of our income. As a result of the
size of the potential increases of the tangible and intangible assets of the LLC
attributable to our interest in the LLC, during the expected term of the tax
benefit sharing agreement, the payments that we may make to our historical LLC
equity investors could be substantial should our stock price appreciate prior to
their exchanging their membership interests in the LLC.
Senior
Debt facility
In
September 2006, our Operating Subsidiaries entered into a
$230.0 million senior secured bank facility with BNP Paribas and a
syndicate of lenders to finance the construction of our Wood River and Fairmont
plants. Neither the Company nor the LLC is a borrower under the Senior Debt
facility, although the equity interests and assets of our subsidiaries are
pledged as collateral to secure the debt under the facility.
The
Senior Debt facility initially consisted of two construction loans, which
together totaled $210.0 million of available borrowings, and working capital
loans of up to $20.0 million. No principal payments were required
until the construction loans were converted to term
loans. Thereafter, principal payments are payable quarterly at a
minimum amount of $3,150,000, with additional pre-payments to be made out of
available cash flow. The Operating Subsidiaries received a Notice of
Default from the lenders, dated May 22, 2009, asserting that a “material adverse
effect” had occurred due to the Company’s lack of liquidity. The
Company disagreed with the lenders assertion that a material adverse effect had
occurred and, beginning on May 28, 2009, entered into a series of consent
agreements with its lenders, granting the Operating Subsidiaries limited access
to its bank accounts as it continued discussions with the lenders relating to
the asserted events of default and conversion of the construction loans to term
loans. Effective September 29, 2009, the Operating Subsidiaries
entered into a Waiver and Amendment to the Senior Debt which converted the two
construction loans to two term loans and waived all defaults previously asserted
by the lenders. At conversion, the Waiver and Amendment to the Senior
Debt provided for $198.6 million of total funded debt under the term
loans. Following the conversion, the Operating Subsidiaries made
their first principal payment on September 30, 2009 of $3.2 million which
resulted in $195.4 million in term loans outstanding as of September 30,
2009. The Waiver and Amendment to the Senior Debt also provides for
up to $9.7 million in additional loans to make future principal and interest
payments under the Senior Debt facility. The term loans mature in
September 2014.
The
Senior Debt facility also includes working capital loans of up to
$20.0 million, a portion of which is available to us in the form of letters
of credit. The working capital loans are available to pay certain operating
expenses of the plants, and may be drawn on and repaid at any time until
maturity. The working capital loans mature in September 2010,
and as a result the entire outstanding amount of such loans was classified as
current as of September 30, 2009. However ,with consent from
two-thirds of the lenders, the maturity date of the working capital loans may be
extended to September 2011. As of September 30, 2009, the
Company’s subsidiaries had $20.0 million of outstanding working capital
loans.
Although
we have borrowed substantial amounts under the Senior Debt facility, additional
borrowings remain subject to the satisfaction of a number of
additional conditions precedent, including continued compliance with debt
covenants and payment of principal and interest when due. To the extent that we
are not able to satisfy these requirements, we will not be able to make
additional borrowings under the Senior Debt facility without obtaining a waiver
or consent from the lenders.
The
Senior Debt facility includes certain limitations on, among other things, the
ability of our subsidiaries to incur additional indebtedness, grant liens or
encumbrances, declare or pay dividends or distributions, conduct asset sales or
other dispositions, mergers or consolidations, and conduct transactions with
affiliates. The Company has established collateral deposit accounts maintained
by an agent of the banks, into which our revenues are to be deposited. These
funds will then be allocated into various sweep accounts held by the collateral
agent, with the remaining cash, if any, distributed to the Company each month.
The sweep accounts have various provisions, including an interest coverage ratio
and debt service reserve requirements, which will restrict the amount of cash
that is made available to the Company each month.
31
The
obligations under the Senior Debt facility are secured by first priority liens
on all assets of the borrowers and a pledge of all of our equity interests in
our subsidiaries. In addition, substantially all cash of the borrowers is
required to be deposited into blocked collateral accounts subject to security
interests to secure any outstanding obligations under the Senior Debt facility.
Funds will be released from such accounts only in accordance with the terms of
the Senior Debt facility.
Interest
rates on each of the loans under the Senior Debt facility will be, at our
option, (a) a base rate equal to the higher of (i) the federal funds effective
rate plus 0.5% or (ii) BNP Paribas’s prime rate, in each case, plus 2.0% or (b)
a Eurodollar rate equal to LIBOR adjusted for reserve requirements plus 3.0%.
Interest periods for loans based on a Eurodollar rate will be, at our option,
one, three or six months, or, if available, nine or twelve months. Accrued
interest is due quarterly in arrears for base rate loans, on the last date of
each interest period for Eurodollar loans with interest periods of one or three
months, and at three month intervals for Eurodollar loans with interest periods
in excess of three months. Overdue amounts bear additional interest at a default
rate of 2.0%. The average interest rate in effect on the borrowings at September
30, 2009 was 3.3%. As a result of the Notice of Default, the lenders caused the
construction loans and working capital loans to revert to base rate, effective
June 1, 2009 which resulted in additional interest expense of approximately
$350,000 per month for the period of June through September 2009. This resulted
in incremental interest expense of approximately $1,050,000 for the third
quarter of 2009. Effective October 1, 2009, the term loans and working capital
loans under the Senior Debt facility were converted back to LIBOR-based
loans.
We are
required to pay certain fees in connection with our Senior Debt facility,
including a commitment fee equal to 0.50% per annum on the daily average unused
portion of the construction loans and working capital loans and letter of credit
fees. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 we incurred $0,
and $51,000 in commitment fees, respectively.
Debt
issuance fees and expenses of approximately $8.5 million ($5.2 million, net of
accumulated amortization) have been incurred in connection with the Senior Debt
facility through September 30, 2009. These costs have been deferred and are
being amortized over the term of the Senior Debt facility, although the
amortization of debt issuance costs during the period of construction through
August 2008, were capitalized as part of the cost of the constructed assets.
During the three month and nine month periods ended September 30, 2009, we
amortized $361,000 and $723,000 in debt issuance costs to interest expense,
respectively.
Subordinated
Debt agreement
The LLC
is the borrower of subordinated debt under a loan agreement dated September 25,
2006, entered into with certain affiliates of Greenlight Capital, Inc. and Third
Point LLC, each of which are related parties. The loan agreement provides for up
to $50.0 million of non-amortizing loans, all of which must be used for general
corporate purposes, working capital or the development, financing and
construction of our ethanol plants. Interest on the subordinated debt is payable
quarterly in arrears at a 15.0% annual rate. The entire principal balance, if
any, plus all accrued and unpaid interest will be due in March 2015. Once
repaid, the subordinated debt may not be re-borrowed. The subordinated debt is
secured by the subsidiary equity interests owned by the LLC and are fully and
unconditionally guaranteed by all of the LLC’s subsidiaries, which guarantees
are subordinated to the obligations of these subsidiaries under our Senior Debt
facility. A default under our Senior Debt facility would also constitute a
default under our subordinated debt and would entitle the lenders to accelerate
the repayment of amounts outstanding. The receipt by the Company of the Notice
of Default dated May 22, 2009, from the lenders under the Senior Debt facility
constituted an event of default under the Subordinated Debt. The Sub Lenders did
not elect to exercise any of the rights and remedies available to them as a
result of the Notice of Default under the Senior Debt facility, and did not
declare or otherwise provide a notice of acceleration. Since all of the asserted
events of default under the Senior Debt facility were waived by the lenders
under that facility on September 29, 2009, there is no longer an event of
default under the Subordinated Debt.
All $50.0
million available under the subordinated debt agreement was borrowed in the
first six months of 2007. During the third quarter of 2007, the Company retired
$30.0 million of its subordinated debt with a portion of the initial public
offering proceeds. This resulted in accelerated amortization of deferred fees of
approximately $3.1 million, which represents the fees relating to the pro rata
share of the retired debt.
The LLC
did not make the scheduled quarterly interest payments which were due on
September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2008. Under the terms of the subordinated
debt agreement, the failure to pay interest when due is an event of default. In
January 2009, the LLC and the subordinated debt lenders entered into a waiver
and amendment agreement to the subordinated debt agreement. Under the waiver and
amendment, an initial payment of $2.0 million, which was made on January 16,
2009, was made to pay the $767,000 of accrued interest due September 30, 2008
and to reduce outstanding principal by $1,233,000. As of September 30, 2009, the
LLC had $20.1 million outstanding under its subordinated debt facility.
Effective upon the $2.0 million initial payment, the subordinated debt lenders
waived the defaults and any associated penalty interest relating to our failure
to make the September 30, 2008 and the December 31, 2008 quarterly interest
payments. Effective December 1, 2008, interest on the subordinated debt began
accruing at a 5.0% annual rate compounded quarterly, a rate that will apply
until the debt owed to Cargill, under an agreement entered into simultaneously,
has been paid in full, at which time the rate will revert to a 15.0% annual rate
and quarterly payments in arrears are required. As long as the debt to Cargill
remains outstanding, future payments to the subordinated debt lenders will be
contingent upon available cash (as defined in both agreements) being received by
the LLC.
32
Debt
issuance fees and expenses of approximately $5.5 million ($1.5 million, net of
accumulated amortization) have been incurred in connection with the subordinated
debt through September 30, 2009. Debt issuance costs associated with the
subordinated debt are being deferred and amortized over the term of the
agreement, although the amortization of debt issuance costs during the period of
construction through August 2008 were capitalized as part of the cost of the
constructed assets.
Cargill
debt agreement
During
the second quarter of 2008, the LLC entered into various derivative instruments
with Cargill in order to manage exposure to commodity prices for corn and
ethanol, generally through the use of futures, swaps, and option contracts.
During August 2008, the market price of corn declined sharply, exposing the LLC
to large losses and significant unmet margin calls under these contracts.
Cargill began liquidating the hedge contracts in August 2008 and by September
30, 2008 the LLC was no longer a party to any hedge contracts for any of its
commodities. In January 2009, the LLC and Cargill entered into an agreement
which finalized the payment terms for $17.4 million owed to Cargill by the LLC
related to these hedging losses. The agreement with Cargill required an initial
payment of $3.0 million on the outstanding balance, which was paid on December
5, 2008. Upon the initial payment of $3.0 million, Cargill also forgave $3.0
million. Effective December 1, 2008, interest on the Cargill debt began accruing
at a 5.0% annual rate compounded quarterly. Future payments to Cargill of both
principal and interest are contingent upon the receipt by the LLC of available
cash, as defined in the agreement. Cargill will forgive, on a dollar for dollar
basis, a further $2.8 million as it receives the next $2.8 million of principal
payments. The Cargill Debt is being accounted for in accordance with Financial
Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification (“FASB ASC”)
470-60, Troubled Debt
Restructurings by Debtors. As the future cash payments specified by the
terms exceed the carrying amount of the debt before the $3.0 million is
forgiven, the carrying amount of the debt is not reduced and no gain is
recorded. As future payments are made, the LLC will determine, based on the
timing of payments, whether or not any gain contingency should be
recorded.
Capital
lease
The LLC,
through its subsidiary that constructed the Fairmont plant, entered into an
agreement with the local utility pursuant to which the utility has built and
owns and operates a substation and distribution facility in order to supply
electricity to the plant. The LLC is paying a fixed facilities charge based on
the cost of the substation and distribution facility of $34,000 per month, over
the 30-year term of the agreement. This fixed facilities charge is being
accounted for as a capital lease in the accompanying financial statements. The
agreement also includes a $25,000 monthly minimum energy charge that also began
in the first quarter of 2008.
Notes
payable
Notes
payable relate to certain financing agreements in place at each of our sites.
The subsidiaries of the LLC that constructed the plants entered into finance
agreements in the first quarter of 2008 for the purchase of certain rolling
stock equipment to be used at the facilities for $748,000. The notes have fixed
interest rates (weighted average rate of approximately 5.6%) and require 48
monthly payments of principal and interest, maturing in the first and second
quarter of 2012. In addition, the subsidiary of the LLC that constructed the
Wood River facility has entered into a note payable for $2,220,000 with a fixed
interest rate of 11.8% for the purchase of our natural gas pipeline. The note
requires 36 monthly payments of principal and interest and matures in the first
quarter of 2011. In addition, the subsidiary of the LLC that constructed the
Wood River facility has entered in a note payable for $419,000 with the City of
Wood River for special assessments related to street, water, and sanitary
improvements at our Wood River facility. This note requires 10 annual payments
of $58,000, including interest at 6.5%, and matures in 2018.
Tax
increment financing
In
February 2007, the subsidiary of the LLC that constructed the Wood River plant
received $6.0 million from the proceeds of a tax increment revenue note issued
by the City of Wood River, Nebraska. The proceeds funded improvements to
property owned by the subsidiary. The City of Wood River will pay the principal
and interest of the note from the incremental increase in the property taxes
related to the improvements made to the property. The proceeds have been
recorded as a liability and will be reduced as the LLC remits property taxes to
the City of Wood River beginning in 2008 and continuing for approximately 13
years. The LLC has guaranteed the principal and interest of the tax increment
revenue note if, for any reason, the City of Wood River fails to make the
required payments to the holder of the note.
33
Letters
of credit
The
Company had obtained three letters of credit, for a total of approximately $1.9
million outstanding, as of September 30, 2009. These letters of credit have been
provided as collateral to the natural gas provider at the Fairmont plant and the
electrical service providers at both the Fairmont and Wood River plants, and are
all secured by certificates of deposit in the respective amounts, which will
automatically renew each year.
Off-balance
sheet arrangements
Except
for our operating leases discussed in Note 12 to the consolidated financial
statements, we do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are
reasonably likely to have a material current or future effect on our financial
condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of
operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources.
Summary
of critical accounting policies and significant estimates
The
consolidated financial statements of BioFuel Energy Corp. included in this Form
10-Q have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States. Note 2 to these financial statements contains a
summary of our significant accounting policies, certain of which require the use
of estimates and assumptions. Accounting estimates are an integral part of the
preparation of financial statements and are based on judgments by management
using its knowledge and experience about the past and current events and
assumptions regarding future events, all of which we consider to be reasonable.
These judgments and estimates reflect the effects of matters that are inherently
uncertain and that affect the carrying value of our assets and liabilities, the
disclosure of contingent liabilities and reported amounts of expenses during the
reporting period.
The
accounting estimates and assumptions discussed in this section are those that we
believe involve significant judgments and the most uncertainty. Changes in these
estimates or assumptions could materially affect our financial position and
results of operations and are therefore important to an understanding of our
consolidated financial statements.
Recoverability
of property, plant and equipment
We have
made a significant investment in property, plant and equipment. Construction of
our two ethanol facilities located in Wood River and Fairmont has been
completed. We evaluate the recoverability of fixed assets whenever events or
changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of our property, plant
and equipment may not be recoverable.
Management
must continuously assess whether or not circumstances require a formal
evaluation of the recoverability of our property, plant and equipment. In
analyzing impairment, management must estimate future ethanol and distillers
grain sales volume, ethanol and distillers grain prices, corn and natural gas
prices, inflation and capital spending, among other factors. These estimates
involve significant inherent uncertainties, and the measurement of the
recoverability of the cost of our property, plant and equipment is dependent on
the accuracy of the assumptions used in making the estimates and how these
estimates compare to our future operating performance. Certain of the operating
assumptions will be particularly sensitive and subject to change as the ethanol
industry develops.
Recoverability
is measured by comparing the carrying value of an asset with estimated
undiscounted future cash flows expected to result from the use of the asset and
its eventual disposition. An impairment loss is reflected as the amount by which
the carrying amount of the asset exceeds the fair value of the asset. Fair value
is determined based on the present value of estimated expected future cash flows
using a discount rate commensurate with the risk involved, quoted market prices
or appraised values, depending on the nature of the assets. As of September 30,
2009, no circumstances existed which would indicate the carrying value of
long-lived assets may not be fully recoverable. Therefore, no recoverability
test was performed.
Share-based
compensation
Under the
fair value recognition provisions of this guidance, share-based compensation
cost for stock options granted is measured at the grant date based on the
award’s fair value as calculated by the Black-Scholes option-pricing model and
is recognized as expense over the requisite service period. The key assumptions
generally used in the Black-Scholes calculations include the expected term, the
estimated volatility of our common stock, and the risk-free rate of return
during the expected term. Additionally, we are required to estimate the expected
forfeiture rate, as we recognize expense only for those shares or stock options
expected to vest. Due to the uncertainties inherent in these estimates, the
amount of compensation expense to be recorded will be dependent on the
assumptions used in making the estimates.
34
Recent
accounting pronouncements
In May
2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued new requirements related
to subsequent events, to incorporate the accounting and disclosure requirements
for subsequent events into GAAP. This new requirement introduces new
terminology, defines a date through which management must evaluate subsequent
events, and lists the circumstances under which an entity must recognize and
disclose events or transactions occurring after the balance-sheet date. The
Company adopted these new requirements as of June 30, 2009, which was the
required effective date.
The
Company evaluated its September 30, 2009 financial statements for subsequent
events through November 12, 2009, the date the financial statements were issued.
The Company is not aware of any subsequent events which would require
recognition or disclosure in the financial statements.
From time
to time, new accounting pronouncements are issued by the FASB or other standards
setting bodies that are adopted by us as of the specified effective date. Unless
otherwise discussed, our management believes that the impact of recently issued
standards that are not yet effective will not have a material impact on our
consolidated financial statements upon adoption.
ITEM
3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
We are
subject to significant risks relating to the prices of four primary commodities:
corn and natural gas, our principal production inputs, and ethanol and
distillers grain, our principal products. These commodities are also subject to
geographic basis differentials, which can vary considerably. In recent years,
ethanol prices have been primarily influenced by gasoline prices, the
availability of other gasoline additives and federal, state and local laws,
regulations, subsidies and tariffs. Distillers grain prices tend to be
influenced by the prices of alternative animal feeds. However, in the short to
intermediate term, logistical issues may have a significant impact on ethanol
prices. In addition, the acceptance by livestock operators of the anticipated
sharp increase in quantities of distillers grain production as new ethanol
plants become operational could significantly depress its
price.
We expect
that lower ethanol prices will tend to result in lower profit margins even when
corn prices decrease due to the significance of fixed costs. The price of
ethanol is subject to wide fluctuations due to domestic and international supply
and demand, infrastructure, government policies, including subsidies and
tariffs, and numerous other factors. Ethanol prices are extremely volatile. From
October 1, 2007 to September 30, 2009, the CBOT ethanol month prices have
fluctuated from a low of $1.40 per gallon in December 2008 to a high of $2.94
per gallon in June 2008 and averaged $1.96 per gallon during this
period.
We expect
that lower distillers grain prices will tend to result in lower profit margins.
The selling prices we realize for our distillers grain are largely determined by
market supply and demand, primarily from livestock operators and marketing
companies in the U.S. and internationally. Distillers grain are sold by the ton
and can either be sold “wet” or “dry”.
We
anticipate that higher corn prices will tend to result in lower profit margins,
as it is unlikely that such an increase in costs can be passed on to ethanol
customers. The availability as well as the price of corn is subject to wide
fluctuations due to weather, carry-over supplies from the previous year or
years, current crop yields, government agriculture policies, international
supply and demand and numerous other factors. Using an average corn price of
$4.00 per bushel, we estimate that corn will represent approximately 70% of our
operating costs. Historically, the spot price of corn tends to rise during the
spring planting season in May and June and tends to decrease during the fall
harvest in October and November. From October 1, 2007 to September 30, 2009 the
CBOT month price of corn has fluctuated from a low of $3.00 per bushel in
September 2009 to a high of $7.55 per bushel in June 2008 and averaged $4.53 per
bushel during this period.
Higher
natural gas prices will tend to reduce our profit margin, as it is unlikely that
such an increase in costs can be passed on to ethanol customers. Natural gas
prices and availability are affected by weather, overall economic conditions,
oil prices and numerous other factors. Using an average corn price of $4.00 per
bushel and an average price of $5.50 per Mmbtu for natural gas, we estimate that
natural gas will represent approximately 8.5% of our operating costs.
Historically, the spot price of natural gas tends to be highest during the
heating and cooling seasons and tends to decrease during the spring and fall.
From October 1, 2007 to September 30, 2009, the Nymex month price of natural gas
has fluctuated from a low of $2.51 per Mmbtu in September 2009 to a high of
$13.58 per Mmbtu in July 2008 and averaged $6.90 per Mmbtu during this
period.
To reduce
the risks implicit in price fluctuations of these four principal commodities and
variations in interest rates, we plan to continuously monitor these markets and
to hedge a portion of our exposure, provided we have the financial resources to
do so. Specifically, when we can reduce volatility through hedging on an
attractive basis, we expect to do so. Our objective would be to hedge between
60% and 75% of our commodity price exposure on a rolling 12 to 24 month basis
when a positive margin can be assured. This range would include the effect of
intermediate to longer-term purchase and sales contracts we may enter into,
which act as de facto hedges. In hedging, we may buy or sell exchange-traded
commodities futures or options, or enter into swaps or other hedging
arrangements. While there is an active futures market for corn and natural gas,
the futures market for ethanol is still in its infancy and very illiquid, and we
do not believe a futures market for distillers grain currently exists. Although
we will attempt to link our hedging activities such that sales of ethanol and
distillers grain match pricing of corn and natural gas, there is a limited
ability to do this against the current forward or futures market for ethanol and
corn. Consequently, our hedging of ethanol and distillers grain may be limited
or have limited effectiveness due to the nature of these markets. Due to the
Company’s limited liquidity resources and the potential for required postings of
significant cash collateral or margin deposits resulting from changes in
commodity prices associated with hedging activities, the Company is limited in
its ability to hedge with third-party brokers. We also may vary the amount of
hedging activities we undertake, and may choose to not engage in hedging
transactions at all. As a result, our operations and financial position may be
adversely affected by increases in the price of corn or natural gas or decreases
in the price of ethanol or unleaded gasoline.
35
We have
prepared a sensitivity analysis as set forth below to estimate our exposure to
market risk with respect to our projected corn and natural gas requirements and
our ethanol sales for the last three months of 2009. Market risk related to
these factors is estimated as the potential change in pre-tax income, resulting
from a hypothetical 10% adverse change in the fair value of our corn and natural
gas requirements and our ethanol sales based on current prices as of September
30, 2009, excluding activity we may undertake related to corn and natural gas
forward and futures contracts used to hedge our market risk. Actual results may
vary from these amounts due to various factors including significant increases
or decreases in the LLC’s production capacity during the last three months of
2009.
Volume
Requirements
|
Units
|
Price per Unit
at September 30,
2009
|
Hypothetical
Adverse Change
in Price
|
Change in
Three months ended
12/31/09 Pre-tax
Income
|
|||||||||||||
(in millions)
|
(in millions)
|
||||||||||||||||
Ethanol
|
55.8 |
Gallons
|
$ | 1.67 | 10 | % | $ | (9.3 | ) | ||||||||
Corn
|
20.1 |
Bushels
|
$ | 3.39 | 10 | % | $ | (6.8 | ) | ||||||||
Natural
Gas
|
1.7 |
Mmbtu
|
$ | 3.72 | 10 | % | $ | (0.6 | ) |
We
believe that managing our commodity price exposure has the potential to reduce
the volatility implicit in a commodity-based business. However, it may also tend
to reduce our ability to benefit from favorable commodity price changes. Hedging
arrangements also expose us to risk of financial loss if the counterparty
defaults or in the event of extraordinary volatility in the commodities markets.
Furthermore, if geographic basis differentials are not hedged, they could cause
our hedging programs to be ineffective or less effective than anticipated. In
the third quarter of 2008, corn prices pulled back sharply resulting in the
Company realizing significant losses on its hedge contracts. See “Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations—Liquidity and capital resources—Cargill debt agreement” elsewhere in
this report.
We are
subject to interest rate risk in connection with our Senior Debt facility. Under
the facility, our bank borrowings bear interest at a floating rate based, at our
option, on LIBOR or an alternate base rate. In September 2007, the LLC, through
its subsidiaries, entered into an interest rate swap for a two-year period. The
contract was for $60.0 million principal with a fixed interest rate of 4.65%
payable by the subsidiary, and the variable interest rate, the one-month LIBOR,
payable by the third party. The difference between the subsidiary’s fixed rate
of 4.65% and the one-month LIBOR rate, which is reset every 30 days, is received
or paid every 30 days in arrears. This interest rate swap expired in September
2009. In March 2008, the LLC, through its subsidiaries, entered into a second
interest rate swap for a two-year period. The contract is for $50.0 million
principal with a fixed interest rate of 2.766%, payable by the subsidiary, and
the variable interest rate, the one-month LIBOR, payable by the third party. The
difference between the subsidiary’s fixed rate of 2.766% and the one-month LIBOR
rate, which is reset every 30 days, is received or paid every 30 days in
arrears. As of September 30, 2009, we had borrowed $215.4 million under our
Senior Debt facility. After considering the $50.0 million of interest rate swaps
in place with respect to our bank borrowings, a hypothetical 100 basis points
increase in interest rates under our Senior Debt facility would result in an
increase of $1,654,000 on our annual interest expense. See “Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations –
Liquidity and capital resources – Senior Debt facility” elsewhere in this
report.
At
September 30, 2009, we had $2,257,000 of cash and equivalents invested in money
market mutual funds held at one financial institution, which is in excess of
FDIC insurance limits. We also had certificates of deposit for $1.9 million held
at two financial institutions, which is in excess of FDIC insurance limits. The
money market mutual funds are not invested in any auction rate
securities.
36
ITEM
4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Controls
and Procedures
The
Company’s management carried out an evaluation, as required by Rule 13a-15(b) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”), with the participation
of our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, of the
effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of our
last fiscal quarter. Based upon this evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and
the Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and
procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q, such that the information relating to the Company and its
consolidated subsidiaries required to be disclosed in our Exchange Act reports
filed with the SEC (i) is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within
the time periods specified in SEC rules and forms, and (ii) is accumulated and
communicated to the Company’s management, including our Chief Executive Office
and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding
required disclosure.
In
addition, the Company’s management carried out an evaluation, as required by
Rule 13a-15(d) of the Exchange Act, with the participation of our Chief
Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, of changes in the Company’s
internal control over financial reporting. Based on this evaluation, the Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that no change in
internal control over financial reporting occurred during the quarter ended
September 30, 2009, that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial
reporting.
PART
II. OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1A.
|
RISK
FACTORS
|
The
Company included in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December
31, 2008 a description of certain risks and uncertainties that could affect the
Company’s business, future performance or financial condition (See Part I, Item
1A “Risk Factors” in our Form 10-K). The Risk Factors as included in our Form
10-K are updated by the risk factors described below. You should carefully
consider these risks, and the risks described in our Form 10-K, as well as other
information contained in this Form 10-Q, including “Management’s discussion and
analysis of financial condition and results of operations”. Any of these risks
could significantly and adversely affect our business, prospects, financial
condition and results of operations. These risks are not the only risks facing
the Company. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or
that we currently deem to be immaterial also may materially adversely affect our
business, financial condition or future results.
Commodity
margins continue to present a significant risk, which we may not be able to
hedge against.
Our
results of operations and financial condition depend substantially on the price
of our main commodity input, corn, relative to the price of our main commodity
product, ethanol, which is known in the industry as the “crush spread.” The
prices of these commodities are volatile and beyond our control. As a result of
the volatility of the prices for these and other items, our results fluctuate
substantially and in ways largely beyond our control. As shown in the
accompanying consolidated financial statements, the Company incurred a net loss
of $8.4 million and $28.5 million during the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2009, respectively, primarily resulting from poor operating
margins due to unfavorable crush spreads. Although our losses narrowed in the
third quarter, and crush spreads have steadily improved throughout the year to
date, we cannot predict when or if crush spreads will narrow again or if the
current improved margins will continue. In the event crush spreads narrow
further, and remain at unprofitable levels for an extended period of time, we
may not be able to generate sufficient cash flow to meet our obligations and
sustain our operations.
We have
developed and adopted a risk management policy under which we may enter into
contracts, including exchange-traded futures contracts, to sell a portion of our
ethanol and distillers grain production or to purchase a portion of our corn or
natural gas requirements on a forward basis to attempt to offset some of the
effects of volatility of ethanol prices and costs of commodities. We are
currently unable to engage in such hedging activities due to our lack of
financial resources, and we may not have the financial resources to conduct
hedging activities in the future. In addition, ethanol futures have historically
traded with an inverted price progression, or “strip,” whereby outer month
contracts are priced at lower prices than spot or near-month contracts. In
contrast, corn futures historically have traded such that outer months have
higher prices than near or spot months. As a result, even under market
conditions in which we realize positive margins at current (spot) prices we may
not be able to lock in such margins for future production. Furthermore, because
of the lack of an established futures market or established markets for future
physical delivery of ethanol, we may not be able to price a material amount of
our future production so as to permit us to hedge a material portion of our
commodities price risks.
There
are significant risks arising from the substantial amount of indebtedness we
have incurred.
The
Operating Subsidiaries of the LLC entered into a Senior Secured Credit Facility
originally providing for the availability of an aggregate of $230.0 million of
borrowings (“Senior Debt”) with BNP Paribas and a syndicate of lenders to
finance construction and operation of the Wood River and Fairmont plants. The
Senior Debt initially consisted of two construction loans, which together
totaled $210.0 million of available borrowings, and working capital loans of up
to $20.0 million. No principal payments were required until the construction
loans were converted to term loans. Thereafter, principal payments are payable
quarterly at a minimum amount of $3,150,000, with additional pre-payments to be
made out of available cash flow. The Company received a Notice of Default from
the lenders, dated May 22, 2009, asserting that a “material adverse effect” had
occurred due to the Company’s lack of liquidity. The Company disagreed with the
lenders assertion that a material adverse effect had occurred and, beginning on
May 28, 2009, entered into a series of consent agreements with its lenders
granting the Company limited access to its bank accounts as it continued
discussions with the lenders relating to the asserted events of default and
conversion of the construction loans to term loans. Effective September 29,
2009, the Operating Subsidiaries entered into a Waiver and Amendment to the
Senior Debt which converted the two construction loans to two term loans and
waived all defaults previously asserted by the lenders. At conversion, the
Waiver and Amendment to the Senior Debt provided for $198.6 million of total
funded debt under the term loans. Following the conversion, the Operating
Subsidiaries made their first principal payment on September 30, 2009 of $3.2
million resulting in $195.4 million in term loans outstanding as of September
30, 2009. The Waiver and Amendment to the Senior Debt also provides for up to
$9.7 million in additional loans to make future principal and interest payments
under the Senior Debt. The term loans mature in September 2014.
37
Although,
as of September 30, 2009, we had borrowed a total of $215.4 million (including
the term loans and $20 million in working capital loans) under our Senior Debt
facility, additional borrowings under the remaining debt service reserve
availability of $9.7 million remain subject to the satisfaction of a number of
additional conditions precedent, including compliance with debt covenants and
payment of principal and interest when due. To the extent that we are not able
to satisfy these requirements, we will not be able to make additional borrowings
under our Senior Debt facility without obtaining a waiver or consent from the
lenders, which could prevent or delay our borrowing. In addition, our Senior
Debt facility agreement contains standard clauses regarding occurrence of a
‘‘material adverse effect,’’ which is defined very broadly and in such fashion
as to be subjective. As discussed above, our lenders previously asserted that a
“material adverse effect” had occurred under our Senior Debt facility in May,
2009. Irrespective of the recent resolution of that dispute, in the event our
banks should assert in the future that a ‘‘material adverse effect’’ has
occurred, they could declare us in default and accelerate payment of all
principal and interest due, or prevent us from borrowing additional funds under
the Senior Debt facility
During
our limited period of operations we have been unable to consistently generate
positive cash flow, most recently due to the narrow crush spread experienced in
the commodities markets. If this should recur, we may not be able to generate
enough cash flow from operations in the future or obtain enough additional
capital to service our debt, finance our business operations or fund our planned
capital expenditures. In addition, we have had, and continue to have, severely
limited liquidity, with $8.2 million in cash on hand as of September 30, 2009.
If we do not have sufficient cash flow to service our debt, we would need to
refinance all or part of our existing debt, sell assets, borrow more money or
sell securities, any or all of which we may not be able to do on commercially
reasonable terms or at all. If we are unable to do so, we may be required to
curtail operations or cease operating altogether, and could be forced to seek
relief from creditors through a filing under the U.S. Bankruptcy
Code.
A default
under our Senior Debt facility would also constitute a default under our
subordinated debt and would entitle both the senior lenders and the subordinated
lenders to accelerate the repayment of amounts outstanding. In the event of a
default, the lenders could also proceed to foreclose against the assets securing
such obligations, although the ability of the lenders under our subordinated
debt to do so, or to pursue other remedies against the LLC and its subsidiaries,
would be subject to, and substantially limited by, the subordination agreement
among the subordinated debt lenders, the lenders under our Senior Debt facility,
and the LLC and its subsidiaries. The receipt by the Company of the Notice of
Default dated May 22, 2009, from the lenders under the Senior Debt facility
constituted an event of default under the Subordinated Debt. The lenders under
our subordinated debt did not elect to exercise any of the rights and remedies
available to them as a result of the Notice of Default under the Senior Debt
facility, and did not declare or otherwise provide a notice of acceleration.
Since all of the asserted events of default under the Senior Debt facility were
waived by the lenders under that facility on September 29, 2009, there is no
longer an event of default under the Subordinated Debt.
Because
the debt under our existing arrangements subjects substantially all of our
assets to liens, there may be no assets left for stockholders in the event of a
liquidation. In the event of a foreclosure on all or substantially all of our
assets, we may not be able to continue to operate as a going
concern.
We
have encountered unanticipated difficulties in operating our plants, which may
recur and cause us to incur substantial losses.
We are
aware of certain plant design and construction defects that may impede the
reliable operation of the plants and continuous operations. We are in the
process of addressing these and a variety of other reliability issues at our
plants, but we have no assurance that our initiatives will be successful or can
be implemented in a timely fashion or without an extended period of interruption
to operations. As a result, we have encountered unanticipated difficulties and
the operation of our plants has been in some respects more costly or inefficient
than we anticipated, and this may recur in the future. We may be entitled to
damages from our general contractor for warranty claims under our engineering,
procurement and construction contracts for some of the unanticipated
difficulties we have encountered in operating our plants due to deficiencies in
design, construction or materials, but we have no assurance of our ability to
obtain payment for any damages or that such damages, if paid to us, will fully
compensate us for the cost of remedying such defects. In any event, we will not
be able to recover lost sales or lost profits that have resulted, or might
result in the future, from any defect in the design or construction of our
plants.
38
We may
also encounter other factors that could prevent us from conducting operations as
expected, resulting in decreased capacity or interruptions in production,
including shortages of workers or materials, design issues relating to
improvements, construction, repair and equipment cost escalation, transportation
constraints, adverse weather, unforeseen difficulties or labor issues, or
changes in political administrations at the federal, state or local levels that
result in policy change towards ethanol in general or our plants in particular.
Our operations may be subject to significant interruption if any of our
facilities experiences a major accident or is damaged by severe weather or other
natural disasters. In addition, our operations may be subject to labor
disruptions, unscheduled downtime or other operational hazards inherent in our
industry. Some of these operational hazards may cause personal injury or loss of
life, severe damage to or destruction of property and equipment or environmental
damage, and may result in suspension of operations and the imposition of civil
or criminal penalties. Our insurance may not be adequate to cover the potential
operational hazards described above and we may not be able to renew our
insurance on commercially reasonable terms or at all. Any interruption or
cessation of operations due to any of the above factors would cause our sales to
decrease significantly, which would have a material adverse effect on our
results of operation and financial condition.
We
face intense competition for qualified personnel to operate our ethanol
plants.
Our
success depends in large part on our ability to attract and retain competent
personnel. At each of our plants we must retain qualified managers, engineers,
maintenance, operations and other personnel, which can be challenging in a rural
community. Competition for both managers and plant employees in the ethanol
industry can be intense, particularly as competitors have begun operating plants
in close proximity to ours. Although we have hired substantially all of the
personnel necessary to operate our plants, we currently have vacancies for
certain key operations managers which we have had difficulty filling,
particularly as our liquidity issues and our dispute with our lenders under the
Senior Debt facility became widely known in the industry. If we are unable to
hire and maintain or retain productive and competent personnel, our operations
may be adversely affected and we may not be able to efficiently operate our
ethanol plants.
Our
common stock could be delisted from The Nasdaq Global Market, which could
negatively impact the price of our common stock and our ability to access the
capital markets.
Our
common stock is currently listed on The Nasdaq Global Market under the symbol
‘‘BIOF.’’ The listing standards of The Nasdaq Global Market provide, among other
things, that a company may be delisted if the bid price of its stock drops below
$1.00 for a period of 30 consecutive business days. On September 15, 2009, we
received a Nasdaq Staff Deficiency Letter, indicating that the Company had
failed to comply with the minimum bid price requirement for continued listing.
The listing rules also provide a grace period of 180 calendar days during which,
should the closing price of the Company’s stock reach $1.00 or higher for ten or
more consecutive trading days, the Company would once again be in compliance
with the Rule. On October 28, 2009, we received another letter from the Nasdaq
staff, indicating that the closing bid price of the Company’s common stock had
been at $1.00 per share or greater for at least the previous 10 consecutive
business days and that, accordingly, the Company had regained compliance in
accordance with the listing rules. Although we are once again in compliance with
the listing rules of the Nasdaq Global Market, trading in our stock remains
volatile and there can be no assurances that our stock price will not fall below
$1.00 again or, if it does, that it will not trade below $1.00 for 30
consecutive business days.
If we
were to receive another Nasdaq Staff Determination Letter, we will have 180 days
in which to satisfy the minimum bid price requirements. However, in such event,
there can be no assurances that our stock would trade above $1.00 for the 10
consecutive business days required to regain compliance. If we fail to comply
with the listing standards, our common stock listing may be moved, in our
discretion and subject to the satisfaction of certain listing requirements,
including, without limitation, the payment of a listing fee, to the Nasdaq
Capital Market, which is a lower tier market, or our common stock may be
delisted and traded on the over-the-counter bulletin board network. Moving our
listing to the Nasdaq Capital Market could adversely affect the liquidity of our
common stock. The delisting of our common stock would significantly affect the
ability of investors to trade our securities and could significantly negatively
affect the value and liquidity of our common stock. In addition, the delisting
of our common stock could materially adversely affect our ability to raise
capital on terms acceptable to us or at all. Delisting from Nasdaq could also
have other negative results, including the potential loss of confidence by
suppliers and employees, the loss of institutional investor interest and fewer
business development opportunities.
ITEM3.
|
DEFAULTS
UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
|
Please
see Part I, Item 2—Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Result of Operations—Senior Debt Facility, and —Subordinated Debt agreement,
for more information.
ITEM
6.
|
EXHIBITS
|
|
Exhibit
Number
|
Exhibit
|
|
3.1
|
Amended
and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of BioFuel Energy Corp.
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s
Form 8-K filed June 19, 2007)
|
|
3.2
|
BioFuel
Energy Corp. Bylaws, as Amended and Restated (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 3.2 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed March 23,
2009)
|
39
10.1
|
Waiver
and Amendment dated September 29, 2009, pursuant to that certain Credit
Agreement, dated as of September 25, 2006, among BFE Operating Company,
LLC, Buffalo Lake Energy, LLC, and Pioneer Trail Energy, LLC
(collectively, as "Borrowers"),
BFE Operating Company, LLC as Borrowers’ Agent, the Lenders party thereto,
BNP Paribas, as Administrative Agent and Arranger, and Deutsche Bank Trust
Company Americas, as Collateral Agent, incorporated by reference from the
Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on September 30,
2009.
|
|
10.2
|
Agreement
and Omnibus Amendment dated as of July 30, 2009, among Buffalo Lake
Energy, LLC, Cargill, Incorporated and Cargill Commodity Services, Inc.,
incorporated by reference from the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
for the period ended June 30, 2009, filed with the SEC on August 14,
2009.
|
|
10.3
|
Agreement
and Omnibus Amendment dated as of July 30, 2009, among Pioneer Trail
Energy, LLC, Cargill, Incorporated and Cargill Commodity Services, Inc.,
incorporated by reference from the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
for the period ended June 30, 2009, filed with the SEC on August 14,
2009.
|
|
31.1
|
Certification
of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer Pursuant To Section 302 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.
Section 7241).
|
|
31.2
|
Certification
of the Company’s Chief Financial Officer Pursuant To Section 302 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.
Section 7241).
|
|
32.1
|
Certification
of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer Pursuant To Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.
Section 1350).
|
|
32.2
|
Certification
of the Company’s Chief Financial Officer Pursuant To Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.
Section 1350).
|
|
99.1
|
Press
Release Announcing Results for Third Quarter of
2009
|
40
SIGNATURES
Pursuant
to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its
behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
BIOFUEL
ENERGY CORP.
|
||
(Registrant)
|
||
Date:
November 13, 2009
|
By:
|
/s/
Scott H. Pearce
|
Scott
H. Pearce,
|
||
President,
|
||
Chief
Executive Officer and Director
|
||
Date:
November 13, 2009
|
By:
|
/s/
Kelly G. Maguire
|
Kelly
G. Maguire,
|
||
Vice
President - Finance and Chief Financial
Officer
|
41
INDEX
TO EXHIBITS
Exhibit
Number
|
Exhibit
|
|
3.1
|
Amended
and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of BioFuel Energy Corp.
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s
Form 8-K filed June 19, 2007)
|
|
3.2
|
BioFuel
Energy Corp. Bylaws, as Amended and Restated (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 3.2 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed March 23,
2009)
|
|
10.1
|
Waiver
and Amendment dated September 29, 2009, pursuant to that certain Credit
Agreement, dated as of September 25, 2006, among BFE Operating Company,
LLC, Buffalo Lake Energy, LLC, and Pioneer Trail Energy, LLC
(collectively, as "Borrowers"),
BFE Operating Company, LLC as Borrowers’ Agent, the Lenders party thereto,
BNP Paribas, as Administrative Agent and Arranger, and Deutsche Bank Trust
Company Americas, as Collateral Agent, incorporated by reference from the
Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on September 30,
2009.
|
|
10.2
|
Agreement
and Omnibus Amendment dated as of July 30, 2009, among Buffalo Lake
Energy, LLC, Cargill, Incorporated and Cargill Commodity Services, Inc.,
incorporated by reference from the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
for the period ended June 30, 2009, filed with the SEC on August 14,
2009.
|
|
10.3
|
Agreement
and Omnibus Amendment dated as of July 30, 2009, among Pioneer Trail
Energy, LLC, Cargill, Incorporated and Cargill Commodity Services, Inc.,
incorporated by reference from the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
for the period ended June 30, 2009, filed with the SEC on August 14,
2009.
|
|
31.1
|
Certification
of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer Pursuant To Section 302 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.
Section 7241).
|
|
31.2
|
Certification
of the Company’s Chief Financial Officer Pursuant To Section 302 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.
Section 7241).
|
|
32.1
|
Certification
of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer Pursuant To Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.
Section 1350).
|
|
32.2
|
Certification
of the Company’s Chief Financial Officer Pursuant To Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.
Section 1350).
|
|
99.1
|
Press
Release Announcing Results for Third Quarter of
2009
|
42