Green Plains Partners LP - Quarter Report: 2016 June (Form 10-Q)







UNITED STATES 

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

_______________________



FORM 10-Q



Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the

Securities Exchange Act of 1934



For the Quarterly Period Ended June 30, 2016



Commission File Number 001-37469



Green Plains PARTNERS LP 

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)







Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.



☒ Yes   ☐ No





Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).



☒ Yes   ☐ No



Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.



Large accelerated filer ☐      Accelerated filer ☐      Non‑accelerated filer ☒     Smaller reporting company ☐



Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). 



☐ Yes   ☒ No



The registrant had 15,910,658 common units and 15,889,642 subordinated units outstanding as of August 2, 2016.

 

---

 



TABLE OF CONTENTS









 

---

 

Commonly Used Defined Terms



The abbreviations, acronyms and industry terminology used in this quarterly report are defined as follows:



Green Plains Partners LP and Subsidiaries:





Green Plains Inc. and Subsidiaries:





Other Defined Terms:















---

 

GREEN PLAINS PARTNERS LP

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(in thousands, except unit amounts)









*Recast to include the historical balances of assets acquired in a transfer between entities under common control. See Notes 1 and 3 to the consolidated financial statements.



See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.

 

---

 

GREEN PLAINS PARTNERS LP

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(unaudited and in thousands, except per unit amounts)









See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.



 

---

 



GREEN PLAINS PARTNERS LP

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(unaudited and in thousands)





See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.

---

 

GREEN PLAINS PARTNERS LP



NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS



(unaudited)

 

1.  BASIS OF PRESENTATION, DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES



References to the Partnership and to the MLP Predecessor



References to “the partnership” in the consolidated financial statements and in these notes to the consolidated financial statements refer to Green Plains Partners LP and its subsidiaries. References to the “MLP predecessor” refer to BlendStar LLC and its subsidiaries, the partnership’s predecessor for accounting purposes, and the assets, liabilities and results of operations of certain ethanol storage and railcar assets contributed by Green Plains Inc. in connection with the IPO on July 1, 2015. References to “the sponsor” in transactions subsequent to the IPO refer to Green Plains.

 

On July 1, 2015, Green Plains Partners closed its IPO of common units representing limited partner interests of the partnership. Green Plains Holdings LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of Green Plains Inc., serves as the general partner of the partnership. References to (i) “the general partner” and “Green Plains Holdings” refer to Green Plains Holdings LLC; (ii) “the parent,” “the sponsor” and “Green Plains” refer to Green Plains Inc.; and (iii) “Green Plains Trade” refers to Green Plains Trade Group LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of Green Plains.



Consolidated Financial Statements



The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the partnership and its controlled subsidiaries. All significant intercompany balances and transactions are eliminated on a consolidated basis for reporting purposes. Results for the interim periods presented are not necessarily indicative of results expected for the entire year.



The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with GAAP for interim financial information and instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Because they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by GAAP, the consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the partnership’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015, or the 2015 annual report, and the recast Form 8-K filed on May 12, 2016, which retroactively adjusted Items 1, 6, 7, and 15 of our 2015 annual report to give retroactive effect to the acquisition of the ethanol storage and leased railcar assets of the Hereford, Texas and Hopewell, Virginia production facilities.



When transferring assets between entities under common control, the entity receiving the net assets initially recognizes the carrying amounts of the assets and liabilities at the date of transfer and the prior period financial statements of the transferee are recast for all periods the transferred operations were part of the parent’s consolidated financial statements, in accordance with GAAP. On July 1, 2015, in addition to the interests of BlendStar, the partnership received the ethanol storage and railcar assets in a transfer between entities under common control. The transferred assets and liabilities are recognized at our parent’s historical cost and reflected retroactively in the consolidated financial statements presented in this report. Expenses related to the ethanol storage and railcar assets, such as depreciation, amortization and railcar lease expenses, are also reflected retroactively in the consolidated financial statements. There are no revenues related to the operation of the contributed ethanol storage and railcar assets for periods prior to July 1, 2015, when the related commercial agreements with Green Plains Trade became effective.



Effective January 1, 2016, the partnership acquired the ethanol storage and leased railcar assets of the Hereford, Texas and Hopewell, Virginia production facilities from its sponsor in a transfer between entities under common control. The assets were recognized at historical cost and reflected retroactively along with related expenses for periods prior to the effective date of the acquisition, subsequent to the initial dates the assets were acquired by the sponsor, or October 23, 2015, and November 12, 2015, for Hopewell and Hereford, respectively. There were no revenues related to these assets for periods before January 1, 2016, when amendments to the commercial agreements related to the dropdown became effective.



The MLP predecessor was a single member limited liability company, treated as a non-taxable disregarded entity in Green Plains’ federal and state income tax returns. For periods prior to the IPO, the consolidated financial statements reflect income taxes as if the MLP predecessor had filed separate federal and state tax returns.



---

 

The unaudited financial information reflects all adjustments which are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair presentation of the results of operations, financial position and cash flows for the periods presented. The adjustments are normal and recurring in nature, unless otherwise noted.



Reclassifications



Certain prior year amounts were reclassified to conform to a revised current year presentation. These reclassifications did not affect total revenues, operating expenses, net income or partners’ capital.



Use of Estimates in the Preparation of Consolidated Financial Statements



Preparation of the consolidated financial statements in accordance with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. The partnership bases its estimates on historical experience and assumptions it believes are proper and reasonable under the circumstances. The partnership regularly evaluates the appropriateness of these estimates and assumptions. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Key accounting policies, including, but not limited to, those related to depreciation of property and equipment, asset retirement obligations, and impairment of long-lived assets and goodwill are impacted significantly by judgments, assumptions and estimates used to prepare the consolidated financial statements.



Description of Business



The partnership provides fuel storage and transportation services by owning, operating, developing and acquiring ethanol and fuel storage tanks, terminals, transportation assets and other related assets and businesses. The partnership is its parent’s primary downstream logistics provider, supporting its parent’s approximately 1.2 bgy ethanol marketing and distribution business. The partnership’s assets are the principal method of storing and delivering the ethanol the parent produces. The ethanol produced by the parent is fuel and industrial grade, made principally from starch extracted from corn, and is primarily used for blending with gasoline. Ethanol currently comprises approximately 10% of the U.S. gasoline market and is an economical source of octane and oxygenate for blending into the fuel supply. The partnership does not take ownership of, or receive any payments based on the value of, the ethanol or other fuels it handles; as a result, the partnership does not have any direct exposure to fluctuations in commodity prices.



Revenue Recognition



The partnership recognizes revenues when all of the following criteria are satisfied: persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists; services have been rendered; the price is fixed and determinable; and collectability is reasonably assured.



The partnership derives revenues when product is delivered to the customer from its ethanol storage tanks and fuel terminals, and transportation services are performed. The partnership generates a substantial portion of its revenues under fee-based commercial agreements with Green Plains Trade.



The partnership’s storage and throughput agreement and certain terminal services agreements with Green Plains Trade are supported by minimum volume commitments. The partnership’s rail transportation services agreement is supported by minimum take-or-pay capacity commitments. Green Plains Trade is required to pay the partnership fees for these minimum commitments regardless of the actual volume, throughput or capacity used for storage or transport. Payment related to volume that was not actually throughput by Green Plains Trade is applied as a credit toward volume in excess of the minimum volume commitment during any of the next four quarters, after which time unused credits expire. The partnership records a liability for deferred revenue in the amount of the credit that may be used in future periods and for customer prepayments before the product is delivered. The partnership recognizes revenue and relieves the liability when throughput volumes exceed the minimum volume commitment or unused credits expire. As a result, a significant portion of the partnership’s revenues may be associated with cash collected during an earlier period that does not generate any cash during the current period.



Concentrations of Credit Risk



In the normal course of business, the partnership is exposed to credit risk resulting from the possibility a loss may occur due to failure of another party to perform according to the terms of a contract. The partnership provides fuel storage and transportation services for various parties with a significant portion of its revenues earned from Green Plains Trade. The partnership continually monitors its credit risk exposure and concentrations.



---

 

Segment Reporting



The partnership accounts for segment reporting in accordance with ASC 280, Segment Reporting, which establishes standards for entities reporting information about the operating segments and geographic areas in which they operate. Management evaluated how its chief operating decision maker has organized the partnership for purposes of making operating decisions and assessing performance, and concluded it has one reportable segment.



Asset Retirement Obligations



The partnership records an ARO for the fair value of the estimated costs to retire a tangible long-lived asset in the period it will be incurred if it can be reasonably estimated, which is subsequently adjusted for accretion expense. The corresponding asset retirement costs are capitalized as a long-lived asset and depreciated on a straight-line basis over the asset’s remaining useful life. The expected present value technique used to calculate the fair value of AROs includes assumptions about costs, settlement dates, interest, accretion and inflation. Changes in assumptions, including the amount or timing of estimated cash flows, could result in increases or decreases to the AROs. The partnership’s AROs are based on legal obligations to perform remedial activity when certain machinery and equipment are disposed and operating leases expire.



Income Taxes



The partnership is a limited partnership and as a result is not subject to federal income taxes. The partnership owns a subsidiary that is taxed as a corporation for federal and state income tax purposes. In addition, the partnership is subject to state income taxes in certain states. As a result, the financial statements reflect a provision or benefit for such income taxes. The general partner and the unitholders are responsible for paying federal and state income taxes on their share of the partnership’s taxable income.



The partnership recognizes uncertainties in income taxes within the financial statements under a process by which the likelihood of a tax position is gauged based upon the technical merits of the position, and then a subsequent measurement relates the maximum benefit and the degree of likelihood to determine the amount of benefit recognized in the financial statements.



Recent Accounting Pronouncements 



Effective January 1, 2016, the partnership adopted the amended guidance in ASC 835-30, Interest - Imputation of Interest: Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs, which requires debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of that debt liability, consistent with debt discounts. The amended guidance has been applied on a retrospective basis and the balance sheet of each individual period presented has been adjusted to reflect the period-specific effects of the new guidance. 



Effective January 1, 2016, the partnership adopted the amended guidance in ASC 260, Effects on Historical Earnings per Unit of Master Limited Partnership Dropdown Transactions, which specifies how to calculate historical earnings or losses per unit under the two-class method of a transferred business before the date of a dropdown transaction that should be allocated entirely to the sponsor.



Effective January 1, 2018, the partnership will adopt the amended guidance in ASC 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, which requires revenue recognition to reflect the transfer of promised goods or services to customers. The updated standard permits either the retrospective or cumulative effect transition method. Early application beginning January 1, 2017, is permitted. The partnership does not expect the adoption of this guidance to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.



Effective January 1, 2019, the partnership will adopt the amended guidance in ASC 842, Leases, which aims to make leasing activities more transparent and comparable and requires substantially all leases to be recognized by lessees on their balance sheet as a right-of-use asset and corresponding lease liability, including leases currently accounted for as operating leases. Early application is permitted. The partnership is currently evaluating the impact the adoption of the amended guidance will have on the consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.



2.   INITIAL PUBLIC OFFERING



On June 26, 2015, the common units of the partnership began trading under the symbol “GPP” on Nasdaq. On July 1, 2015, the partnership closed the IPO of 11,500,000 common units to the public at a price of $15.00 per common unit.



---

 

In connection with the IPO, the partnership issued (i) 4,389,642 common units and 15,889,642 subordinated units to Green Plains and its affiliates, representing a 62.5% limited partner interest in the partnership; (ii) a 2.0% general partner interest in the partnership and all of its incentive distribution rights to the general partner; and (iii) 11,500,000 common units to the public, representing a 35.5% limited partner interest in the partnership. Green Plains contributed the interests of BlendStar, its ethanol storage facilities and transportation assets, including its leased railcar fleet, to the partnership, and, through its wholly owned subsidiary, controls all of the business and affairs of the partnership.



The partnership received net proceeds of $157.5 million from the sale of 11,500,000 common units, after deducting underwriting discounts of $10.3 million, structuring fees of $0.9 million and other IPO expenses of approximately $3.8 million. The partnership used the net proceeds to make a cash distribution of $155.3 million to Green Plains, in part, as reimbursement for capital expenditures incurred and to pay $0.9 million in origination fees under its new revolving credit facility. The remaining $1.3 million was retained for general partnership purposes.





The following descriptions relate to agreements entered into in connection with the IPO on July 1, 2015. For additional information and the agreements in their entirety, please refer to the 2015 annual report, and Note 11 – Related Party Transactions to the consolidated financial statements in this report.



Omnibus Agreement



In connection with the IPO, the partnership entered into an omnibus agreement with Green Plains and its affiliates which addresses:



If Green Plains or its affiliates cease to control the general partner, then either Green Plains or the partnership may terminate the omnibus agreement, provided that (i) the indemnification obligations of the parties survive according to their respective terms; and (ii) Green Plains’ obligation to reimburse the partnership for operational failures survives according to its terms.



Contribution, Conveyance and Assumption Agreement



On July 1, 2015, in connection with the IPO, the partnership entered into a contribution, conveyance and assumption agreement with the general partner, Green Plains, Green Plains Operating Company, Green Plains Obion and Green Plains Trucking, and the following transactions, among others, occurred concurrently with the closing of the IPO:

---

 

Subsequent to the IPO, Green Plains Obion and Green Plains Trucking conveyed their interest in the partnership to Green Plains.



Operating Services and Secondment Agreement



In connection with the IPO, the general partner entered into an operational services and secondment agreement with Green Plains. Under the terms of the agreement, Green Plains seconds employees to the general partner to provide management, maintenance and operational functions for the partnership, including regulatory matters, health, environment, safety and security programs, operational services, emergency response, employees training, finance and administration, human resources, business operations and planning. The seconded personnel are under the direct management and supervision of the general partner.



The general partner reimburses the parent for the cost of the seconded employees, including wages and benefits. If a seconded employee does not devote 100% of his or her time providing services to the general partner, the general partner reimburses the parent for a prorated portion of the employee’s overall wages and benefits based on the percentage of time the employee spent working for the general partner. The parent bills the general partner monthly in arrears for services provided during the prior month. Payment is due within 10 days of the general partner’s receipt of the invoice.



Revolving Credit Facility



In connection with the IPO, Green Plains Operating Company, entered into an agreement for a five-year, $100.0 million revolving credit facility, as the borrower, with various lenders to fund working capital, acquisitions, distributions, capital expenditures and other general partnership purposes. The revolving credit facility contains customary representations and warranties, affirmative covenants, negative covenants and events of default. The negative covenants include restrictions on the partnership’s ability to incur additional debt, acquire and sell assets, create liens, invest capital, pay distributions and materially amend the partnership’s commercial agreements with Green Plains Trade. See Note 4 – Debt to the consolidated financial statements for further details regarding the revolving credit facility.



Commercial Agreements



In connection with the IPO, the partnership entered into various fee-based commercial agreements with Green Plains Trade, including:



The partnership also assumed:



The storage and throughput agreement and terminal services agreements are supported by minimum volume commitments. The rail transportation services agreement is supported by minimum take-or-pay capacity commitments. All of the commercial agreements with Green Plains Trade include provisions that permit Green Plains Trade to suspend, reduce or terminate its obligations under the applicable commercial agreement if certain events occur, including a material breach of the applicable commercial agreement by the partnership, force majeure events that prevent the partnership or Green Plains Trade from performing the respective obligations under the applicable commercial agreement, and not being available to Green Plains Trade for any reason other than action or inaction by Green Plains Trade. If Green Plains Trade reduces its minimum commitment under the commercial agreements, Green Plains Trade is required to pay fees on the revised minimum commitments only.

 

---

 

3.  ACQUISITION



Effective January 1, 2016, the partnership acquired the ethanol storage and leased railcar assets located in Hereford, Texas and Hopewell, Virginia from Green Plains for $62.3 million. The transaction was financed through the use of the revolving credit facility and cash on hand.



This transaction was considered a transfer between entities under common control; therefore, the net assets were transferred at their historical cost of $6.3 million as of the original date of acquisition by the sponsor in the fourth quarter of 2015. The consolidated financial statements have been recast to reflect the results of operations, financial position and cash flows of this transaction as if the net assets were owned by the partnership since the sponsor purchased the two ethanol production facilities in the fourth quarter of 2015.



The following is a summary of assets acquired and liabilities assumed (in thousands):









The following is a summary of the results of operations of the acquired assets for the period of common control during the year ended December 31, 2015 (in thousands):





At the time of acquisition, the Hopewell facility was not operational; however, upon completion of certain maintenance and enhancement projects, operations began at the plant in early February 2016. In conjunction with the transfer of assets under common control, the partnership amended the 1) omnibus agreement, 2) operational services agreement, and 3) ethanol storage and throughput agreement; the rail transportation services agreement was also adjusted. Please refer to Note 11 – Related Party Transactions to the consolidated financial statements for additional information. 



4.  DEBT



Revolving Credit Facility



On July 1, 2015, Green Plains Operating Company entered into an agreement for a five-year, $100.0 million revolving credit facility, as the borrower, with various lenders to fund working capital, acquisitions, distributions, capital expenditures and other general partnership purposes. The revolving credit facility contains customary representations and warranties, affirmative covenants, negative covenants and events of default. The negative covenants include restrictions on the partnership’s ability to incur additional debt, acquire and sell assets, create liens, invest capital, pay distributions and materially amend the partnership’s commercial agreements with Green Plains Trade. The revolving credit facility may be increased up to $50.0 million without the consent of the lenders.



Loans under the revolving credit facility are subject to a floating interest rate based on the partnership’s maximum consolidated net leverage ratio equal to (a) a base rate plus 0.75% to 1.75% per year or (b) a LIBOR rate plus 1.75% to 2.75%.  The revolving credit facility requires the partnership to maintain a maximum consolidated net leverage ratio of no more than 3.50 to 1.00 and a minimum consolidated interest coverage ratio of no less than 2.75 to 1.00.



The partnership had $47.0 million borrowings outstanding as of June 30, 2016, and  no borrowings outstanding as of December 31, 2015, under the revolving credit facility.

---

 



Qualified Low Income Community Investment Notes



Birmingham BioEnergy was a recipient of qualified low income community investment notes executed in June 2013 in conjunction with NMTC financing related to the Birmingham, Alabama terminal. Promissory notes payable totaling $10.0 million and notes receivable of $8.1 million were issued in connection with this transaction. The notes payable bear an interest rate of 1.0% per year and require quarterly interest only payments through December 31, 2019. Beginning March 15, 2020, the notes payable require quarterly principal and interest payments of approximately $0.2 million and mature on September 15, 2031. BlendStar retains the right to call $8.1 million of the promissory notes payable in 2020. Income tax credits were generated for the benefit of the lender in connection with the NMTC financing. BlendStar guaranteed the lender the value of these income tax credits over their statutory lives of seven years in the event the income tax credits are recaptured or reduced. The value of the income tax credits was estimated to be $5.0 million at the time of the transaction. The partnership believes the likelihood of recapture or reduction of the income tax credits is remote, and therefore has not established a liability in connection with this guarantee.



The investors of the NMTC financing paid $1.9 million to Birmingham BioEnergy in the form of a promissory note and are entitled to all of the NMTC tax benefits derived from the Birmingham facility. This transaction includes a put/call provision under which BlendStar can forgive the $1.9 million. The partnership accounted for the $1.9 million as a grant received and reflected a reduction in the carrying value of the property and equipment at Birmingham BioEnergy, which is recognized in earnings as a decrease in depreciation expense over the useful life of the property and equipment.



Effective January 1, 2016, the partnership adopted ASC 835-30, Interest - Imputation of Interest: Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs, which resulted in the reclassification of approximately $221 thousand from other assets to long-term debt within the balance sheet as of December 31, 2015. As of June 30, 2016, there was $197 thousand of debt issuance costs recorded as a direct reduction of the carrying value of the partnership’s long-term debt. 



Scheduled long‑term debt repayments as of June 30, 2016, are as follows (in thousands):







Covenant Compliance

 

The partnership, including all of its subsidiaries, was in compliance with its debt covenants as of June 30, 2016.



Capitalized Interest



The partnership’s policy is to capitalize interest costs incurred on debt during the construction of major projects. The partnership had no capitalized interest for the  three and six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015.



5.  UNIT-BASED COMPENSATION



The board of directors of the general partner adopted the LTIP upon completion of the IPO. The LTIP is intended to promote the interests of the partnership, its general partner and affiliates by providing unit-based incentive compensation awards to employees, consultants and directors to encourage superior performance. The LTIP reserves 2,500,000 common units for issuance in the form of options, restricted units, phantom units, distribution equivalent rights, substitute awards, unit appreciation rights, unit awards, profits interest units or other unit-based awards. The partnership measures unit-based compensation grants at fair value on the grant date and records noncash compensation expense related to the awards over the requisite service period.



---

 

The non-vested unit-based award activity for the six months ended June 30, 2016, is as follows:









Compensation costs of approximately $37 thousand and $22 thousand were recognized during the three and six months ended June 30, 2016, respectively. A net benefit of $15 thousand was recognized due to a forfeiture during the three months ended March 31, 2016. There were no unit-based compensation costs during the three and six months ended June 30, 2015.  At June 30, 2016, there were no unrecognized compensation costs from unit-based compensation.

 

6.  PARTNERS’ CAPITAL





Components of partners’ capital are as follows (in thousands):







*Recast to include the historical balances of assets acquired in a transfer between entities under common control. See Notes 1 and 3 to the consolidated financial statements.



A rollforward of the number of common and subordinated limited partner units outstanding is as follows:









The partnership’s subordinated units are not entitled to distributions until the common units have received the minimum quarterly distribution for that quarter plus any arrearages of the minimum quarterly distribution from prior quarters. Subordinated units do not accrue arrearages.



The partnership agreement authorizes the partnership to issue unlimited additional partnership interests on the terms and conditions determined by the general partner without unitholder approval.

---

 



Quarterly distributions are made within 45 days after the end of each calendar quarter, assuming the partnership has sufficient available cash. Available cash generally means, all cash and cash equivalents on hand at the end of that quarter less cash reserves established by the general partner plus all or any portion of the cash on hand resulting from working capital borrowings made subsequent to the end of that quarter.



On February 12, 2016, the partnership distributed $13.1 million to unitholders of record as of February 5, 2016, related to the quarterly cash distribution of $0.4025 per unit that was declared on January 21, 2016, for the quarter ended December 31, 2015.



On May 13, 2016, the partnership distributed $13.1 million to unitholders of record as of May 6, 2016, related to the quarterly cash distribution of $0.4050 per unit that was declared on April 21, 2016, for the quarter ended March 31, 2016.



On July  20, 2016, the board of directors of the general partner declared a quarterly cash distribution of $0.41 per unit, or approximately $13.3 million in total, for the quarter ended June 30, 2016. The distribution will be paid on August 12, 2016, to unitholders of record as of August 5, 2016.



The allocation of total cash distributions to the general and limited partners applicable to the period the distributions were earned for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016, are as follows (in thousands):























7.  EARNINGS PER UNIT



The partnership computes earnings per unit using the two-class method. Earnings per unit applicable to common and subordinated units is calculated by dividing the respective limited partners’ interest in net income by the weighted average number of common and subordinated units outstanding during the period, adjusted for the dilutive effect of any outstanding dilutive securities. Diluted earnings per limited partner unit is the same as basic earnings per limited partner unit as there were no potentially dilutive common or subordinated units outstanding as of June 30, 2016.  The following tables show the calculation of earnings per limited partner unit – basic and diluted (in thousands, except for per unit data):





 

---

 













8.  INCOME TAXES



The partnership is a limited partnership and as a result is not subject to federal income taxes. The partnership owns a subsidiary that is taxed as a corporation for federal and state income tax purposes. In addition, the partnership is subject to state income taxes in certain states. As a result, the financial statements reflect a provision or benefit for such income taxes. The general partner and the unitholders are responsible for paying federal and state income taxes on their share of the partnership’s taxable income.



The MLP predecessor was a single member limited liability company, treated as a non-taxable disregarded entity in Green Plains’ federal and state income tax returns. For periods prior to the IPO, the consolidated financial statements reflect income taxes as if the MLP predecessor had filed separate federal and state tax returns. Under a tax sharing agreement between the MLP predecessor and Green Plains, the MLP predecessor periodically made payments to Green Plains for its share of Green Plains’ tax liabilities. Differences between amounts due to Green Plains under the agreement and the total income tax expense of the MLP predecessor, which were determined as if the MLP predecessor filed separate tax returns, are reflected as member contributions in partners’ capital. These amounts included net contributions of $11 thousand for the six months ended June 30, 2015.



Income taxes for the MLP predecessor were accounted for under the asset and liability method. Deferred tax assets and liabilities were recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases, and for net operating loss and tax credit carry-forwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities were measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates was recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date.

 

At the closing of the IPO, current and deferred income taxes were settled through equity contributions from Green Plains. At the same time, the MLP predecessor’s participation in the tax sharing agreement was terminated.



9.  COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES



Operating Leases



The partnership leases certain facilities, parcels of land, and railcars under agreements that expire on various dates. For accounting purposes, rent expense is based on a straight-line amortization of the total payments required over the term of the lease, which resulted in a deferred lease liability of $660 thousand and $349 thousand as of June 30, 2016, and December 31, 2015, respectively. The partnership incurred lease expenses of $6.1 million and $12.6 million during the three and six months

---

 

ended June 30, 2016, respectively, and $5.6 million and $11.2 million during the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, respectively. Aggregate minimum lease payments under these agreements in future years are as follows (in thousands):







In connection with the IPO, the partnership and Green Plains Trade entered into a ten-year storage and throughput agreement, under which Green Plains Trade was obligated to throughput a minimum of 212.5 mmg of product per calendar quarter at the partnership’s storage facilities and pay $0.05 per gallon on all volume it throughputs.



Effective January 1, 2016, the storage and throughput agreement was amended in connection with the acquisition of the ethanol storage and leased railcar assets of the Hereford and Hopewell production facilities. In accordance with the amended agreement, Green Plains Trade is now obligated to throughput a minimum of 246.5 mmg per calendar quarter. For accounting purposes, the partnership records revenues related to this agreement as operating lease revenues. Minimum revenues under this agreement in future years are as follows (in thousands):







Service Agreements



The partnership entered into agreements for contracted services with certain vendors that require the partnership to pay minimum monthly amounts, which expire on various dates. The partnership exceeded all minimum commitments under these agreements during the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015. Aggregate minimum payments under these agreements in future years are as follows (in thousands):







Legal



Routinely, the partnership may be involved in litigation that arises during the ordinary course of business. The partnership is not currently party to any material litigation.

 

---

 

10.   MAJOR CUSTOMERS



Revenues from three customers exceeding 10% of the partnership’s total revenues are as follows (in thousands):





  

11.  RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS



The partnership engages in various related party transactions with Green Plains and subsidiaries of Green Plains.



Green Plains provides a variety of shared services to the partnership, including general management, accounting and finance, payroll and human resources, information technology, legal, communications and treasury activities. These costs are proportionally allocated by Green Plains to its subsidiaries based on common financial metrics management believes are reasonable. While these allocated costs are not necessarily representative of costs that may have been incurred if they were from a third party, the partnership believes these costs would not have been materially different had they been determined on a stand-alone basis. The partnership recorded expenses related to these shared services of approximately $0.9 million and $1.8 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016, respectively, and $176 thousand and $182 thousand for  three and six months ended June 30, 2015, respectively. In addition, the partnership reimburses Green Plains for wages and benefits of employees directly performing services on its behalf. Green Plains may also pay certain direct costs on behalf of the partnership, which are reimbursed by the partnership. The partnership believes the consolidated financial statements reflect all material costs of doing business related to these operations, including expenses incurred by other entities on its behalf.



The partnership has various fee-based commercial agreements with Green Plains Trade. In connection with the IPO, the partnership entered into:



The partnership also assumed:



The storage and throughput agreement and terminal services agreements are supported by minimum volume commitments. The rail transportation services agreement is supported by minimum take-or-pay capacity commitments.



Under the storage and throughput agreement, Green Plains Trade was obligated to throughput a minimum of 212.5 mmg of product per calendar quarter at the partnership’s storage facilities and pay $0.05 per gallon on all volume it throughputs. Effective January 1, 2016, the storage and throughput agreement was amended in connection with the acquisition of certain ethanol storage and leased railcar assets of the Hereford and Hopewell production facilities. Under the amended agreement, Green Plains Trade is now obligated to a throughput of 246.5 mmg per calendar quarter. If Green Plains Trade fails to meet its minimum volume commitment during any quarter, Green Plains Trade will pay the partnership a deficiency payment equal to the deficient volume multiplied by the applicable fee. The deficiency payment may be applied as a credit toward volumes throughput by Green Plains Trade in excess of the minimum volume commitment during the next four quarters, after which time any unused credits will expire. Green Plains Trade has met its minimum volume commitments for each of the quarters since inception of the storage and throughput agreement.



Under the rail transportation services agreement, Green Plains Trade is obligated to use the partnership to transport ethanol and other fuels from receipt points identified by Green Plains Trade to nominated delivery points. Effective January 1, 2016, the rail transportation agreement, as previously amended, was adjusted in connection with the acquisition of the ethanol storage and leased railcar assets of the Hereford and Hopewell production facilities. Under the adjusted agreement,

---

 

Green Plains Trade agreed to an increase in the minimum railcar volumetric capacity commitment of 6.7 mmg. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2016, the average monthly fee was approximately $0.0343 and $0.0351 per gallon, respectively, for the railcar volumetric capacity provided by the partnership, which was 80.0 mmg as of June 30, 2016. Green Plains Trade is also obligated to use the partnership for logistical operations management and other services related to railcar volumetric capacity. Green Plains Trade is obligated to pay a monthly fee of approximately $0.0013 per gallon for these services. Green Plains Trade reimburses the partnership for costs related to: (1) railcar switching and unloading fees; (2) increased costs related to changes in law or governmental regulation related to the specification, operation or maintenance of railcars; (3) demurrage charges, except when the charges are due to the partnership’s gross negligence or willful misconduct; and (4) fees related to rail transportation services under transportation contracts with third-party common carriers. Since the IPO, lease renewals entered into by Green Plains Trade were done in the normal course of business at comparable margins.



Under the trucking transportation agreement, Green Plains Trade pays the partnership to use its truck transportation services to transport ethanol and other fuels from receipt points identified by Green Plains Trade to nominated delivery points. Green Plains Trade is obligated to pay a monthly trucking transportation services fee equal to the aggregate volume transported in a calendar month by the partnership’s trucks, multiplied by the applicable rate for each trucking lane. Green Plains Trade reimburses the partnership for costs related to: (1) truck switching and unloading fees; (2) increased costs related to changes in law or governmental regulation related to the specification, operation and maintenance of trucks; and (3) fees related to trucking transportation services under transportation contracts with third-party common carriers.



Under the Birmingham terminal services agreement, Green Plains Trade is obligated to pay $0.0355 per gallon on its throughput subject to a minimum volume commitment of approximately 2.8 mmg per month of ethanol and other fuels, as well as fees for providing ancillary services. 



The partnership recorded revenues from Green Plains Trade under the storage and throughput agreement and rail transportation agreement of $21.8 million and $42.0 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016. The partnership recorded revenues from Green Plains Trade related to trucking and terminal services of $1.7 million and $3.3 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016, respectively, and the MLP predecessor recorded revenues from Green Plains Trade related to trucking and terminal services of $1.3 million and $2.6 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, respectively.



In February 2015, a subsidiary of the MLP predecessor made an equity distribution to Green Plains in the amount of $3.3 million.

 



---

 

Item 2.  Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.



The following discussion and analysis provides information we believe is relevant to understand our consolidated financial condition and results of operations. This discussion should be read in conjunction with our unaudited consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes contained in this report together with our 2015 annual report and recast Form 8‑K. The results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016,  are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the full year.



Cautionary Information Regarding Forward-Looking Statements



This report contains forward-looking statements based on current expectations that involve a number of risks and uncertainties. Forward-looking statements generally do not relate strictly to historical or current facts, but rather to plans and objectives for future operations based on management’s reasonable estimates of future results or trends, and include statements preceded by, or followed by words such as “anticipates,” “believes,” “continue,” “estimates,” “expects,” “intends,” “outlook,” “plans,” “predicts,” “may,” “could,” “should,” “will,” and similar words and phrases, and include, but are not limited to, statements regarding future operating or financial performance, business strategy, business environment, key trends and benefits of actual or planned acquisitions. In addition, any statements that refer to expectations, projections or other characterizations of future events or circumstances, including any underlying assumptions, are forward-looking statements. The forward-looking statements are made in accordance with safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Although we believe our expectations regarding future events are based on reasonable assumptions, any or all forward-looking statements in this report may be based on inaccurate assumptions or not account for known or unknown risks and uncertainties, and therefore, may be incorrect. Consequently, no forward-looking statement is guaranteed, and actual future results may vary materially from the results expressed or implied in our forward-looking statements. The cautionary statements in this report apply to all of our forward-looking statements. In addition, we are not obligated, and do not intend, to update any of our forward-looking statements at any time unless an update is required by applicable securities laws. Factors that could cause actual results to differ from those expressed or implied in the forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, those discussed in Part I, Item 1A – Risk Factors of our 2015 annual report. Specifically, we may experience significant fluctuations in future operating results due to a number of economic conditions, such as changes in general economic, market or business conditions; foreign imports of ethanol; fluctuations in demand for ethanol and other fuels; risks of accidents or other unscheduled shutdowns affecting our assets, including mechanical breakdown of equipment or infrastructure; risks associated with changes to federal policy or regulation; ability to comply with changing government usage mandates and regulations affecting the ethanol industry; price availability and acceptance of alternative fuels and alternative fuel vehicles, and laws mandating such fuels or vehicles; changes in operational costs at our facilities and for our railcars; failure to realize the benefits projected for capital projects; competition; inability to successfully implement growth strategies; the supply of corn and other feedstocks; unusual or severe weather conditions and natural disasters; ability and willingness of parties with whom we have material relationships, including Green Plains Trade, to fulfill their obligations; labor and material shortages; changes in the availability of unsecured credit and changes affecting the credit markets in general; and other risk factors detailed in our reports filed with the SEC.



In light of these assumptions, risks and uncertainties, the results and events discussed in the forward-looking statements contained in this report or in any document incorporated by reference might not occur. Investors are cautioned not to place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements, which represent management’s views only as of the date of this report or the date of the document incorporated by reference in this report. We are not under any obligation, and expressly disclaim any obligation, to update or alter any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.



Overview



Green Plains Partners is a  Delaware limited partnership that provides fee-based fuel storage and transportation services by owning, operating, developing and acquiring ethanol and fuel storage tanks, terminals, transportation assets and other related assets and businesses. We were formed by Green Plains, a vertically integrated ethanol producer, to be its primary downstream logistics provider and completed our IPO on July 1, 2015, at which time our parent contributed its ethanol storage and leased railcar assets in a transfer between entities under common control. We generate a substantial portion of our revenues under fee-based commercial agreements with Green Plains Trade for receiving, storing, transferring and transporting ethanol and other fuels, which are supported by minimum volume or take-or-pay capacity commitments. We do not take ownership or receive any payments based on the value of the ethanol or other fuels we handle; therefore, we do not have any direct exposure to fluctuating commodity prices.

---

 

Results of Operations



Industry Trends and Factors Affecting our Results of Operations



In May of 2016, the EPA released its 2017 renewable fuel standard proposal, outlining the volume requirements for biofuels under the Clean Air Act. The proposal modestly increases the minimum volume requirements of ethanol to 14.8 billion gallons for the coming year. This proposal is expected to be finalized by November of 2016.



Gasoline demand increased during the second quarter as a result of lower gasoline prices and normal seasonality. Ethanol demand followed gasoline demand and also increased. According to the EIA, during the second quarter of 2016, domestic ethanol demand averaged 918,000 barrels per day and estimated net exports averaged 51,000 barrels per day, while domestic ethanol production averaged 962,000 barrels per day. Compared with EIA-reported first quarter production of 983,000 barrels per day, domestic demand of 861,000 barrels per day and net exports of 102,000 barrels per day, which caused ethanol inventories to build, second quarter fundamentals reduced ethanol inventories. As of July 1, 2016, domestic ethanol ending stocks were 21.6 million barrels according to the EIA, 3.0% lower than April 1, 2016, and 8.6% higher than one year ago. Summer driving season, particularly in an environment of relatively inexpensive gasoline prices, is expected to increase domestic ethanol consumption over the next quarter. The number of retail stations offering E15 continued to grow during the first half of the year, reaching 275 stations as of June 30, 2016. 



During the second quarter, our parent operated its facilities at approximately 89.8% of capacity, resulting in record ethanol production of 274.3 million gallons for the quarter, compared with 238.7 million gallons for the quarter ended June 30, 2015. The increase in production volumes and associated revenues were attributable to production at the Hereford, Texas plant, which our parent acquired on November 12, 2015, and the Hopewell, Virginia plant, which our parent acquired on October 23, 2015 and resumed ethanol production on February 8, 2016.



U.S. ethanol produced from corn continues to be the most economical source of octane and oxygenates for the world fuel supply. Ethanol futures have generally traded at a premium to RBOB since September of 2015. During the second quarter of 2016, ethanol traded at a premium to RBOB by 4 cents per gallon on average driven by its global demand. The market price of RINs associated with ethanol also increased during the quarter, providing non-obligated parties incentive to continue blending with ethanol. Corn prices fell with the USDA’s news of increased acres of corn of 94.1 million in its June 30, 2016, acreage report. The equivalent value of sugar produced from corn starch is approximately 7.3 cents per pound based on current U.S. corn costs of approximately $3.50 per bushel. Brazil, the second largest ethanol-producing country, uses sugarcane to produce ethanol. The average market price of sugar during the second quarter was 17.1 cents per pound, peaking at 21.0 cents. Global sugar prices have surged since February 2016 on forecasts of supply shortages. Given these production economics, we expect the United States will continue to be the leading supplier of ethanol in the world.



According to data from the U.S. Department of Commerce and U.S. Census Bureau Foreign Trade Statistics, year-to-date U.S. ethanol exports through May 31, 2016, was 400.7 million gallons, compared to 377.1 million gallons for the same period in 2015. The top five countries to receive U.S. exports were China, Canada, Brazil, India and South Korea, which accounted for 80% of total U.S. exports.



Adjusted EBITDA and Distributable Cash Flow



Adjusted EBITDA is defined as earnings before interest expense, income tax expense, depreciation and amortization, plus adjustments for transaction costs related to acquisitions or financing transactions, minimum volume commitment deficiency payments, unit-based compensation expense and net gains or losses on asset sales.



Distributable cash flow is defined as adjusted EBITDA less interest paid or payable, income taxes paid or payable and maintenance capital expenditures, which are defined under our partnership agreement as cash expenditures (including expenditures for the construction or development of new capital assets or the replacement, improvement or expansion of existing capital assets) made to maintain our operating capacity or operating income.



We believe the presentation of adjusted EBITDA and distributable cash flow provides useful information to investors in assessing our financial condition and results of operations. Adjusted EBITDA and distributable cash flow are supplemental financial measures that we use to assess our financial performance; however, these presentations are not made in accordance with GAAP. The GAAP measure most directly comparable to adjusted EBITDA and distributable cash flow is net income. Since adjusted EBITDA and distributable cash flow may be defined differently by other companies in our industry, our definitions of adjusted EBITDA and distributable cash flow may not be comparable to similarly titled measures of other companies, diminishing its utility. Adjusted EBITDA and distributable cash flow should not be considered in isolation or as

---

 

alternatives to net income or any other measure of financial performance presented in accordance with GAAP to analyze our results.



The following table presents a reconciliation of net income to adjusted EBITDA for each of the periods presented and a reconciliation of net income to distributable cash flow for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 (in thousands): 







(1) Distributable cash flow computations for periods before the partnership’s IPO are not considered meaningful.

(2) Includes distributions declared for the quarter ended June 30, 2016.

(3) Includes distributions declared for the quarters ended March 31, 2016, and June 30, 2016.



Recent Developments



On June 12, 2016, our parent entered into an asset purchase agreement to acquire two ethanol plants with combined annual production capacity of approximately 180 million gallons for approximately $200 million in cash, plus certain inventory adjustments and liabilities. The agreement constitutes a stalking horse bid, which is subject to bidding procedures and receipt of higher or otherwise better bids at the proposed auction for the plants, and approval by the U.S. Bankruptcy Court.  Should our parent submit the winning bid, the parent expects the transactions to close during the third quarter of 2016 and to offer the plants’ transportation and storage assets to the partnership.



On June 14, 2016, our parent and Jefferson Gulf Coast Energy Partners, a subsidiary of Fortress Transportation and Infrastructure Investors LLC, announced the formation of a 50/50 joint venture to construct and operate an intermodal export and import fuels terminal at Jefferson’s existing Beaumont, Texas terminal. Green Plains will offer its interest in the joint venture to the partnership once commercial development is complete.



Comparability of our Financial Results



For the six months ended June 30, 2016, the financial results reflect those of the partnership, which includes the results related to assets acquired from our sponsor subsequent to the IPO in transfers between entities under common control. For the six months ended June 30, 2015, the financial results reflect only those of the MLP predecessor, which includes the results of BlendStar, our predecessor for accounting purposes, and the assets, liabilities and results of operations of certain ethanol storage and railcar assets contributed by Green Plains in a transfer between entities under common control in connection with the IPO.



When transferring assets between entities under common control, the entity receiving the net assets initially recognizes the carrying amounts of the assets and liabilities at the date of transfer and the prior period financial statements of the transferee are recast for all periods the transferred operations were part of the parent’s consolidated financial statements, in accordance with GAAP. On July 1, 2015, in addition to the interests of BlendStar, we received the ethanol storage and railcar assets in a transfer between entities under common control. The transferred assets and liabilities are recognized at our

---

 

parent’s historical cost and reflected retroactively in the consolidated financial statements presented in this report. Expenses related to the ethanol storage and railcar assets, such as depreciation, amortization and railcar lease expenses, are also reflected retroactively in the consolidated financial statements. There are no revenues related to the operation of the contributed ethanol storage and railcar assets for periods prior to July 1, 2015, when the related commercial agreements with Green Plains Trade became effective.

 

Selected Financial Information and Operating Data



The following table reflects selected financial information (in thousands):









The following table reflects selected operating data:







(1) Volumetric data for periods before July 1, 2015, is not considered meaningful, as the related commercial agreements were not in effect prior to that date.



Three Months Ended  June 30, 2016,  Compared with the Three Months Ended June 30, 2015



Revenues generated from our storage and throughput agreement and rail transportation services agreement with Green Plains Trade, executed in connection with our IPO and effective beginning July 1, 2015, were $21.8 million for the three months ended June 30, 2016.



Operations and maintenance expenses increased $1.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2016,  compared with the same period for 2015, primarily due to higher railcar lease expense and wages, partially offset by lower terminal throughput unloading fees.



General and administrative expenses increased $0.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2016, compared with the same period for 2015, primarily due to administrative costs incurred as a publicly traded entity.



---

 

Six Months  Ended June 30, 2016, Compared with the Six Months Ended June 30, 2015



Revenues generated from our storage and throughput agreement and rail transportation services agreement with Green Plains Trade, executed in connection with our IPO and effective beginning July 1, 2015, were $42.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016.



Operations and maintenance expenses increased $3.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016, compared with the same period for 2015, primarily due to higher railcar lease expense and wages, partially offset by lower terminal throughput unloading fees.



General and administrative expenses increased $1.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016, compared with the same period for 2015, primarily due to administrative costs incurred as a publicly traded entity.



Liquidity and Capital Resources



Our principal sources of liquidity include cash generated from operating activities and borrowings under our revolving credit facility. We consider opportunities to repay, redeem, repurchase or refinance our debt, depending on market conditions, as part of our normal course of doing business. Our ability to meet our debt service obligations and other capital requirements depends on our future operating performance, which is subject to general economic, financial, business, competitive, legislative, regulatory and other conditions, many of which are beyond our control. We plan to fund future expansion capital expenditures primarily from external sources, including borrowings under our revolving credit facility and issuances of debt and equity securities, and expect these sources will be adequate for both our short-term and long-term liquidity needs.    



On January 1, 2016, we purchased the ethanol storage and leased railcar assets of the Hereford and Hopewell production facilities from our sponsor by drawing $48.0 million on our revolving credit facility and using cash on hand. At June 30, 2016,  we had $2.8 million of cash and cash equivalents and  $53.0 million available under our revolving credit facility.



Net cash provided by operating activities was $28.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016, compared with net cash used by operating activities of $8.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2015. Cash flows from operating activities were driven primarily by increased operating profits. Net cash used by investing activities was $62.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016, primarily due to the acquisition of ethanol storage and leased railcar assets from our sponsor on January 1, 2016. Net cash provided by financing activities was $20.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016, primarily due to net borrowings on the revolving credit facility related to the acquisition of ethanol storage and leased railcar assets from our sponsor on January 1, 2016, partially offset by quarterly cash distributions.



We incurred capital expenditures of $0.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016,  of which $0.2 million relate to maintenance capital expenditures.



Revolving Credit Facility



On July 1, 2015, Green Plains Operating Company entered into an agreement for a five-year, $100.0 million revolving credit facility with various lenders to fund working capital, acquisitions, distributions, capital expenditures and other general partnership purposes. As of June 30, 2016, we had $47.0 million in borrowings outstanding under the revolving credit facility at a weighted-average interest rate of 2.5%. We were in compliance with our debt covenants as of June 30, 2016, and expect to maintain compliance with our debt covenants over the next twelve months. For more information related to our debt, see Note 4 – Debt to the consolidated financial statements included in this report and Note 8 – Debt to the consolidated financial statements included in our recast Form 8-K.



Distributions to Unitholders



The partnership agreement provides for a minimum quarterly distribution of $0.40 per unit, which equates to approximately $13.0 million per quarter, or $51.9 million per year, based on the 2% general partner interest and the number of common and subordinated units currently outstanding. For more information, see Note 6 – Partners’ Capital to the consolidated financial statements included in this report.



On February 12, 2016, the partnership distributed $13.1 million to unitholders of record as of February 5, 2016, related to the quarterly cash distribution of $0.4025 per unit that was declared on January 21, 2016, for the quarter ended December 31, 2015.



---

 

On May 13, 2016, the partnership distributed $13.1 million to unitholders of record as of May 6, 2016, related to the quarterly cash distribution of $0.4050 per unit that was declared on April 21, 2016, for the quarter ended March 31, 2016.



On July 20, 2016, the board of directors of the general partner declared a quarterly cash distribution of $0.41 per unit, or approximately $13.3 million in total, for the quarter ended June 30, 2016. The distribution will be paid on August 12, 2016, to unitholders of record as of August 5, 2016.



Contractual Obligations



Our contractual obligations as of June 30, 2016, were as follows (in thousands):







(1)  Excludes debt discounts and issuance costs.

(2)  Interest amounts are calculated over the terms of the loans using current interest rates, assuming scheduled principal and interest amounts are paid pursuant to the debt agreements. Includes administrative and/or commitment fees on debt obligations.

(3)  Operating lease costs are primarily for property and railcar leases.

(4)  Service agreements are related to minimum commitments on unloading contracts.

(5)  Includes asset retirement obligations to return property to its original condition at the termination of lease agreements.



Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates



Key accounting policies, including those relating to depreciation of property and equipment, asset retirement obligations, and impairment of long-lived assets and goodwill are impacted significantly by judgments, assumptions and estimates used to prepare our consolidated financial statements. Information about our critical accounting policies and estimates are included in our recast Form 8-K.



Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

 

We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements other than operating leases, which are entered into in the ordinary course of business and disclosed in the Contractual Obligations section above.

 

Item 3.  Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.



Market risk is the risk of loss arising from adverse changes in market rates and prices. At this time, we conduct all of our business in U.S. dollars and are not exposed to foreign currency risk.



Interest Rate Risk



We are exposed to interest rate risk through our revolving credit facility, which bears interest at variable rates.  At June 30, 2016, we had $47.0 million outstanding under the revolving credit facility. A 10% change in interest rates would affect our interest cost by approximately $116 thousand per year, assuming no changes in the amount outstanding or other variables under our revolving credit facility.



Other details about our outstanding debt are discussed in the notes to the consolidated financial statements included in this report and  in  our recast Form 8-K.



Commodity Price Risk



We do not have any direct exposure to risks associated with fluctuating commodity prices because we do not own the ethanol and other fuels that are stored at our facilities or transported by our railcars. 

---

 

 

Item 4.   Controls and Procedures.



Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures



We maintain disclosure controls and procedures designed to ensure information that must be disclosed in the reports we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to management, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required financial disclosure.



Under the supervision and participation of our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, management carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of June 30, 2016, as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act and concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective.



Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting



There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.



Emerging Growth Company Status



As an emerging growth company,  we are not required to provide an auditor’s attestation report on the effectiveness of our system of internal control over financial reporting, adopt new or revised financial accounting standards until they apply to private companies, comply with any new requirements adopted by the PCAOB to rotate audit firms or supplement the auditor’s report with additional information about the audit and financial statements of the issuer, or disclose the same level of information about executive compensation required of larger public companies.



We have elected to take advantage of these provisions except for the exemption that allows us to extend the transition period for compliance with new or revised financial accounting standards. This election is irrevocable.

---

 

PART II – OTHER INFORMATION



Item 1.   Legal Proceedings.



We may be involved in litigation that arises during the ordinary course of business. We are not, however, involved in any material litigation at this time.



Item 1A.  Risk Factors.



Investors should carefully consider the discussion of risks and the other information in our 2015 annual report and recast Form 8-K, and in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q, including the risk factors discussion in Part I, Item 1A, “Risk Factors” of the 2015 annual report and the discussion of risks and other information in this report, including “Cautionary Information Regarding Forward-Looking Statements,” which is included in Part I, Item 2, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.” Although we have attempted to discuss key factors, our investors need to be aware that other risks may prove to be important in the future. New risks may emerge at any time. We cannot predict such risks nor estimate the extent to which they may affect our financial performance. There have been no material changes to the risk factors disclosed in our 2015 annual report.



Item 2.  Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.



None.



Item 3.  Defaults Upon Senior Securities.



None.



Item 4.  Mine Safety Disclosures.



Not applicable.



Item 5.  Other Information.



None.

---

 

Item 6. Exhibits. 







---

 

SIGNATURES



Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.





 



---