GROW SOLUTIONS HOLDINGS, INC. - Quarter Report: 2015 September (Form 10-Q)

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

☒    QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended: September 30, 2015

OR

☐    TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from __________ to __________

Commission File No. 000-29301

GROW SOLUTIONS HOLDINGS, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

535 5th Avenue, 24th Floor

New York, NY 10017

(Address of principal executive offices)

(646)-863-6341

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the past 12 months, and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☒    No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files. Yes ☒    No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act:

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ☐    No ☒

As of November 16, 2015, there were 54,596,612 shares outstanding of the registrant’s common stock.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements.

INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Grow Solutions Holdings, Inc.

(Formerly known as Lightouch Vein & Laser, Inc.)

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets

(Unaudited)

See accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements

Grow Solutions Holdings, Inc.

(Formerly known as Lightouch Vein & Laser, Inc.)

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations

(Unaudited)

See accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements

Grow Solutions Holdings, Inc.

(Formerly known as Lightouch Vein & Laser, Inc.)

Condensed Consolidated Statement of Changes in Stockholders' Equity

For the Period from March 21, 2014 (Inception) through September 30, 2015

(unaudited)

See accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements

Grow Solutions Holdings, Inc.

(Formerly known as Lightouch Vein & Laser, Inc.)

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(Unaudited)

See accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements

GROW SOLUTIONS HOLDINGS, INC.

(FORMERLY KNOWN AS LIGHTOUCH VEIN & LASER, INC.)

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Note 1 — Organization and Operations

Grow Solutions Holdings, Inc. (formerly known as LightTouch Vein & Laser, Inc. and Strachan, Inc.) (the “Company”) was organized under the laws of the State of Nevada on May 1, 1981. Currently, the Company provides indoor and outdoor gardening supplies to the rapidly growing garden industry.

The Merger

Effective April 28, 2015, the Company entered into an Acquisition Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “the Merger”) with Grow Solutions, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Grow Solutions”) and LightTouch Vein & Laser Acquisition Corporation, a Delaware corporation and a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company (“LightTouch Acquisition”). Under the terms of the Merger, Grow Solutions merged with LightTouch Acquisition and became a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company. The Grow Solutions’ shareholders and certain creditors of the Company received 44,005,000 shares of the Company’s common stock in exchange for all of the issued and outstanding shares of Grow Solutions. Following the closing of the Grow Solutions Agreement, Grow Solutions’ business became the primary focus of the Company and Grow Solutions management assumed control of the management of the Company with the former director of the Company resigning upon closing of the Agreement. Shareholders maintained 1,886,612 as part of the recapitalization.

As a result of the Merger, the Company discontinued its pre-Merger business. The Merger was accounted for as a “reverse merger,” and Grow Solutions, was deemed to be the accounting acquirer in the reverse merger. Consequently, the assets and liabilities and the historical operations that will be reflected in the financial statements prior to the Merger will be those of Grow Solutions and will be recorded at the historical cost basis and the consolidated financial statements after completion of the Merger will include the assets and liabilities of Grow Solutions., historical operations of the Company, and operations of the Company and its subsidiaries from the closing date of the Merger. As a result of the issuance of the shares of the Company’s Common Stock pursuant to the Merger, a change in control of the Company occurred as of the date of consummation of the Merger. The Merger is intended to be treated as a tax-free exchange under Section 368(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. All historical share amounts of the accounting acquirer were retrospectively recast to reflect the share exchange.

The Acquisition

Effective May 13, 2015 (the “Closing Date”), the Company entered into an Acquisition Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “OneLove Agreement’) with Grow Solutions Acquisition LLC, a Colorado limited liability company and a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company (“Grow Solutions Acquisition”), One Love Garden Supply LLC, a Colorado limited liability company (“OneLove”), and all of the members of OneLove (the “Members”). On the Closing Date, OneLove merged with Grow Solutions Acquisition and became a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company. Under the terms of the OneLove Agreement, the Members received (i) 1,450,000 shares of the Company’s common stock (the “Equity”), (ii) Two Hundred Thousand Dollars (US$200,000) (the “Cash”), and (iii) a cash flow promissory note in the aggregate principal amount of $50,000 issued by OneLove in favor of the Members (the “Cash Flow Note”), whereby each fiscal quarter, upon the Company recording on its financial statements $40,000 in US GAAP Net Income (“Net Income”) from sales of the Company’s products (the “Net Income Threshold”), the Company shall pay to the Members 33% of the Company’s Net Income generated above the Net Income Threshold. The aforementioned obligations owed under the Cash Flow Note shall extinguish upon the earlier of (i) payment(s) by Company in an amount equal to $50,000 in the aggregate or (ii) May 5, 2016 (collectively, the Cash Flow Note, the Equity, and the Cash, the “Consideration”). The Consideration provided to the Members was in exchange for all of the issued and outstanding membership interests of OneLove. Following the Closing Date, OneLove’s business was acquired by the Company and the Company’s management assumed control of the management of OneLove with the former managing members of OneLove resigning from OneLove upon closing of the OneLove Agreement.

The Company recorded the purchase of OneLove using the acquisition method of accounting as specified in ASC 805 “Business Combinations.” This method of accounting requires the acquirer to (i) record purchase consideration issued to sellers in a business combination at fair value on the date control is obtained, (ii) determine the fair value of any non-controlling interest, and (iii) allocate the purchase consideration to all tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their acquisition date fair values. Further, the Company commenced reporting the results of OneLove on a consolidated basis with those of the Company effective upon the date of the acquisition.

The Company consolidated OneLove as of May 13, 2015, and the results of operations of the Company include that of OneLove from May 13, 2015 through September 30, 2015.  The Company recognized net revenues attributable to OneLove of $1,318,128 and recognized income of $162,072 during the period May 13, 2015 through September 30, 2015.

The following table summarizes fair values of the net liabilities assumed and the allocation of the aggregate fair value of the purchase consideration, and net liabilities to assumed identifiable and unidentifiable intangible assets.

The fair value allocation is based on management’s estimates:

As per the Acquisition agreement, the Company has paid $10,000 of the $50,000 cash flow note and as of September 30, 2015, the balance of the cash flow note is $40,000.

Asset Purchase Agreement

On September 23, 2015 (the “Closing Date”), the Company entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement (the “APA”) by and among One Love and D&B Industries, LLC, a Colorado limited liability company doing business as Hygrow. On the Closing Date, the Company purchased all of the assets, rights, properties, and business of Hygrow including certain debts of Hygrow (the “Assets”). Under the terms and conditions of the APA, and for full consideration of the transfer of such Assets to the Company on the Closing Date, the Company issued Hygrow three hundred thousand (300,000) shares of common stock of the Company and a payment to Hygrow in the amount of $5,200 in cash. Following the Closing Date the Company’s management assumed control of the management of Hygrow with the former managing members of Hygrow resigning upon closing of the APA.

The Company recorded the purchase of Hygrow using the acquisition method of accounting as specified in ASC 805 “Business Combinations.” This method of accounting requires the acquirer to (i) record purchase consideration issued to sellers in a business combination at fair value on the date control is obtained, (ii) determine the fair value of any non-controlling interest, and (iii) allocate the purchase consideration to all tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their acquisition date fair values. Further, the Company commenced reporting the results of Hygrow on a consolidated basis with those of the Company effective upon the date of the acquisition.

The following table summarizes fair values of the net liabilities assumed and the allocation of the aggregate fair value of the purchase consideration, and net liabilities to assumed identifiable and unidentifiable intangible assets.

The fair value allocation is based on management’s estimates:

The Financing

Also during the period ended September 30, 2015, the Company completed a closing of a private placement offering (the “Offering”) of 2,705,000 Units, at a purchase price of $0.20 per Unit, each Unit consisting of 1 share of the Company’s common stock, and 1 stock purchase warrants. The warrants are exercisable at $0.40 per warrant into a share of the Company’s common stock and have a maturity of 3 years.

The aggregate gross proceeds from the closing were $541,000 (the Company recorded $332,570 for the fair value of the warrants as a derivative liability see Note 4).

Note 2 — Going Concern and Management’s Plan

The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis, which contemplates the realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business.  As of September 30, 2015, the Company had a working capital of $336,380 and an accumulated deficit of $1,343,217.  The Company has a history net losses since inception. The Company believes that it has sufficient cash to fund its operations.  However, there is no assurance that the Company’s projections and estimates are accurate.  In the event that the Company does not receive anticipated proceeds operations and financings, it is possible that the Company would not have sufficient resources to continue as a going concern for the next year. In order to mitigate these risks, the Company is actively managing and controlling the Company’s cash outflows. These matters raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.  The financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of asset amounts or the classification of liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.

The Company’s primary sources of operating funds since inception have been private equity, and debt and equity financings. The Company intends to raise additional capital through private debt and equity investors. The Company needs to raise additional capital in order to be able to accomplish its business plan objectives. The Company is continuing its efforts to secure additional funds through debt or equity instruments. Management believes that it will be successful in obtaining additional financing based on its history of raising funds; however, no assurance can be provided that the Company will be able to do so. There is no assurance that any funds it raises will be sufficient to enable the Company to attain profitable operations or continue as a going concern. To the extent that the Company is unsuccessful, the Company may need to curtail or cease its operations and implement a plan to extend payables or reduce overhead until sufficient additional capital is raised to support further operations. There can be no assurance that such a plan will be successful.

Note 3 — Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of presentation

The Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“US GAAP”) and the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”).

The unaudited condensed consolidated financial information furnished herein reflects all adjustments, consisting solely of normal recurring items, which in the opinion of management are necessary to fairly state the financial position of the Company and the results of its operations for the periods presented. This report should be read in conjunction with the Company’s financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company’s Form 8-K for the period from inception through December 31, 2014 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) on May 4, 2015. The Company assumes that the users of the interim financial information herein have read or have access to the audited financial statements for the preceding fiscal year and that the adequacy of additional disclosure needed for a fair presentation may be determined in that context. Accordingly, footnote disclosure, which would substantially duplicate the disclosure contained in the Company’s Form 8-K for the period from inception through December 31, 2014 has been omitted. The results of operations for the interim periods presented are not necessarily indicative of results for the entire year ending December 31, 2015 or any other period.

Principles of Consolidation

The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiary, One Love Garden Supply LLC. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

Use of estimates and assumptions

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with US GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date(s) of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period(s).

Critical accounting estimates are estimates for which (a) the nature of the estimate is material due to the levels of subjectivity and judgment necessary to account for highly uncertain matters or the susceptibility of such matters to change and (b) the impact of the estimate on financial condition or operating performance is material. The Company’s critical accounting estimates and assumptions affecting the financial statements were: 

These significant accounting estimates or assumptions bear the risk of change due to the fact that there are uncertainties attached to these estimates or assumptions, and certain estimates or assumptions are difficult to measure or value.

Management bases its estimates on various assumptions that are believed to be reasonable in relation to the financial statements taken as a whole under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

The Company considers all highly liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or less when purchased to be cash equivalents. As of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2015, the Company had cash and cash equivalents of $278,954 and $452,275, respectively. Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of cash deposits. The Company maintains its cash in institutions insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”). At times, the Company’s cash and cash equivalent balances may be uninsured or in amounts that exceed the FDIC insurance limits.

Inventory

Inventory is stated at lower of cost or market using the first-in, first-out (FIFO) valuation method. Inventory was comprised of finished goods at September 30, 2015.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

The Company assesses the recoverability of its long-lived assets, including property and equipment, when there are indications that the assets might be impaired. When evaluating assets for potential impairment, the Company compares the carrying value of the asset to its estimated undiscounted future cash flows.  If an asset’s carrying value exceeds such estimated cash flows (undiscounted and with interest charges), the Company records an impairment charge for the difference.

Goodwill

Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed. The Company is required to perform impairment reviews at each of its reporting units annually and more frequently in certain circumstances. The Company performs the annual assessment on December 31.

In accordance with ASC 350–20 “Goodwill”, the Company is able to make a qualitative assessment of whether it is more likely than not that a reporting unit’s fair value is less than its carrying amount before applying the two–step goodwill impairment test. If the Company concludes that it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is not less than its carrying amount it is not required to perform the two–step impairment test for that reporting unit.

Derivative Liability

The Company evaluates its debt and equity issuances to determine if those contracts or embedded components of those contracts qualify as derivatives to be separately accounted for in accordance with paragraph 815-10-05-4 and Section 815-40-25 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. The result of this accounting treatment is that the fair value of the embedded derivative is marked-to-market each balance sheet date and recorded as either an asset or a liability. In the event that the fair value is recorded as a liability, the change in fair value is recorded in the consolidated statement of operations as other income or expense. Upon conversion, exercise or cancellation of a derivative instrument, the instrument is marked to fair value at the date of conversion, exercise or cancellation and then the related fair value is reclassified to equity.

In circumstances where the embedded conversion option in a convertible instrument is required to be bifurcated and there are also other embedded derivative instruments in the convertible instrument that are required to be bifurcated, the bifurcated derivative instruments are accounted for as a single, compound derivative instrument.

The classification of derivative instruments, including whether such instruments should be recorded as liabilities or as equity, is re-assessed at the end of each reporting period. Equity instruments that are initially classified as equity that become subject to reclassification are reclassified to liability at the fair value of the instrument on the reclassification date. Derivative instrument liabilities will be classified in the balance sheet as current or non-current based on whether or not net-cash settlement of the derivative instrument is expected within 12 months of the balance sheet date.

The Company adopted Section 815-40-15 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“Section 815-40-15”) to determine whether an instrument (or an embedded feature) is indexed to the Company’s own stock.  Section 815-40-15 provides that an entity should use a two-step approach to evaluate whether an equity-linked financial instrument (or embedded feature) is indexed to its own stock, including evaluating the instrument’s contingent exercise and settlement provisions.  

The Company utilizes an option pricing model to compute the fair value of the derivative and to mark to market the fair value of the derivative at each balance sheet date. The Company records the change in the fair value of the derivative as other income or expense in the consolidated statements of operations.

Revenue Recognition

The Company recognizes revenue when it is realized or realizable and earned. The Company considers revenue realized or realizable and earned when all of the following criteria are met: (i) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, (ii) the product has been shipped to the customer, (iii) the sales price is fixed or determinable, and (iv) collectability is reasonably assured.

Equity–based compensation

The Company recognizes compensation expense for all equity–based payments in accordance with ASC 718 “Compensation – Stock Compensation". Under fair value recognition provisions, the Company recognizes equity–based compensation net of an estimated forfeiture rate and recognizes compensation cost only for those shares expected to vest over the requisite service period of the award.

Restricted stock awards are granted at the discretion of the Company. These awards are restricted as to the transfer of ownership and generally vest over the requisite service periods, typically over a five year period (vesting on a straight–line basis). The fair value of a stock award is equal to the fair market value of a share of Company stock on the grant date.

The fair value of an option award is estimated on the date of grant using the Black–Scholes option valuation model. The Black–Scholes option valuation model requires the development of assumptions that are inputs into the model. These assumptions are the value of the underlying share, the expected stock volatility, the risk–free interest rate, the expected life of the option, the dividend yield on the underlying stock and the expected forfeiture rate. Expected volatility is benchmarked against similar companies in a similar industry over the expected option life and other appropriate factors. Risk–free interest rates are calculated based on continuously compounded risk–free rates for the appropriate term. The dividend yield is assumed to be zero as the Company has never paid or declared any cash dividends on its Common stock and does not intend to pay dividends on its Common stock in the foreseeable future. The expected forfeiture rate is estimated based on management’s best estimate.

Determining the appropriate fair value model and calculating the fair value of equity–based payment awards requires the input of the subjective assumptions described above. The assumptions used in calculating the fair value of equity–based payment awards represent management’s best estimates, which involve inherent uncertainties and the application of management’s judgment. As a result, if factors change and the Company uses different assumptions, our equity–based compensation could be materially different in the future. In addition, the Company is required to estimate the expected forfeiture rate and recognize expense only for those shares expected to vest. If the Company’s actual forfeiture rate is materially different from its estimate, the equity–based compensation could be significantly different from what the Company has recorded in the current period.

The Company accounts for share–based payments granted to non–employees in accordance with ASC 505-40, “Equity Based Payments to Non–Employees”. The Company determines the fair value of the stock–based payment as either the fair value of the consideration received or the fair value of the equity instruments issued, whichever is more reliably measurable.  If the fair value of the equity instruments issued is used, it is measured using the stock price and other measurement assumptions as of the earlier of either (1) the date at which a commitment for performance by the counterparty to earn the equity instruments is reached, or (2) the date at which the counterparty’s performance is complete. The fair value of the equity instruments is re-measured each reporting period over the requisite service period.

Loss Per Share

Basic net loss per common share is computed by dividing net loss attributable to common stockholders by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted net loss per common share is determined using the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period, adjusted for the dilutive effect of common stock equivalents. In periods when losses are reported, which is the case for the three months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and the period March 21, 2014 (Inception) through September 30, 2014 presented in these condensed consolidated financial statements, the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding excludes common stock equivalents because their inclusion would be anti-dilutive.

The Company had the following common stock equivalents at September 30, 2015 and 2014:

Subsequent events 

The Company has evaluated events that occurred subsequent to September 30, 2015 and through the date the financial statements were issued.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In February 2015, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2015-02, “Consolidation (Topic 810): Amendments to the Consolidation Analysis” (“ASU 2015-02”). The new consolidation standard changes the way reporting enterprises evaluate whether (a) they should consolidate limited partnerships and similar entities, (b) fees paid to a decision maker or service provider are variable interests in a variable interest entity ("VIE"), and (c) variable interests in a VIE held by related parties of the reporting enterprise require the reporting enterprise to consolidate the VIE. The guidance is effective for public business entities for annual and interim periods in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2015. Early adoption is allowed, including early adoption in an interim period. A reporting entity may apply a modified retrospective approach by recording a cumulative-effect adjustment to equity as of the beginning of the fiscal year of adoption or may apply the amendments retrospectively. The Company is currently assessing the impact, if any, of the adoption of this guidance on the condensed consolidated financial statements.

Note 4 — Notes Receivable and accrued interest

In April 2014, the Company signed a letter of intent with Delta Entertainment Group (‘Delta”) to enter into a reverse merger transaction. In exchange for Delta’s exclusivity until the earlier of the execution of a stock exchange agreement or June 30, 2014, the Company paid Delta $25,000. Delta was to use the $25,000 to become current with its public filings. Since the stock exchange transaction was not executed by June 30, 2014, the $25,000 that the Company provided to Delta reverted to a one year note with an interest rate at 8% per annum. As of December 31, 2014, it was determined by the Company that since Delta lacked the financial resources to get current in its public filings, the collectability of the note was doubtful. Accordingly, the Company has not accrued any interest income on the note and has booked a 100% reserve against the note receivable.

Note 5 — Convertible note

On September 2, 2015, the Company entered into an agreement for the issuance of a convertible note to a third party lender for $120,000. The note accrues interest at 12% per annum maturing on July 2, 2016. The notes are convertible into shares of common stock at a conversion price equal to approximately 58% of the average of the lowest 3 trading prices for the common stock during the 20 day trading period ending on the latest and complete trading day prior to the conversion.

Derivative Analysis

Because the conversion feature included in the convertible note payable has full reset adjustments tied to future issuances of equity securities by the Company, it is subject to derivative liability treatment under Section 815-40-15 of the FASB Accounting Standard Codification (“Section 815-40-15”).

Generally accepted accounting principles require that:

Upon issuance of the note, a debt discount was recorded and any difference in comparison to the face value of the note, representing the fair value of the conversion feature and the warrants in excess of the debt discount, was immediately charged to interest expense.  The debt discount is amortized over the earlier of (i) the term of the debt or (ii) conversion of the debt, using the straight-line method which approximates the interest method. The amortization of debt discount is included as a component of interest expense in the condensed consolidated statements of operations. There was unamortized debt discount of $105,532 as of September 30, 2015.

The fair value of the embedded conversion feature was estimated using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. See Note 6 for the estimates and assumptions used.

Note 6 — Derivative Liabilities

In connection with the private placement transactions during the period ended September 30, 2015, the Company issued 4,955,000 warrants, to purchase common stock with an exercise price of $0.40 and a three year term. The Company identified certain put features embedded in the warrants that potentially could result in a net cash settlement in the event of a fundamental transaction, requiring the Company to classify the warrants as a derivative liability.

In connection with the issuance of a convertible note as discussed above in Note 5, the Company evaluated the note agreement to determine if the agreement contained any embedded components that would qualify the agreement as a derivative. The Company identified certain put features embedded in the convertible note agreement that potentially could result in a net cash settlement in the event of a fundamental transaction, requiring the Company to classify the conversion feature as a derivative liability.

Level 3 Financial Liabilities – Derivative convertible note and warrant liabilities

The following are the major categories of assets and liabilities that were measured at fair value during the nine months ended September 30, 2015, using quoted prices in active markets for identical assets (Level 1), significant other observable inputs (Level 2), and significant unobservable inputs (Level 3):

The following table provides a summary of the changes in fair value, including net transfers in and/or out, of all financial assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs during the nine months ended September 30, 2015.

The fair value of the derivative feature of the convertible notes and warrants on the issuance dates and at the balance sheet date were calculated using an option model valued with the following weighted average assumptions:

Risk-free interest rate: The Company uses the risk-free interest rate of a U.S. Treasury Note with a similar term on the date of the grant.

Dividend yield: The Company uses a 0% expected dividend yield as the Company has not paid dividends to date and does not anticipate declaring dividends in the near future.

Volatility: The Company calculates the expected volatility of the stock price based on the corresponding volatility of the Company’s peer group stock price for a period consistent with the warrants’ expected term.

Remaining term: The Company’s remaining term is based on the remaining contractual maturity of the warrants. 

During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, the Company marked the derivative feature of the warrants to fair value and recorded a gain of $49,259 and a loss of $136,298, respectively, relating to the change in fair value.

Note 6 — Stockholders’ Equity

Preferred Stock

The Company is authorized to issue 25,000,000 shares of preferred stock, $.001 par value, with such rights, preferences, variations and such other designations for each class or series within a class as determined by the Board of Directors. The preferred stock is not convertible into common stock, does not contain any cumulative voting privileges, and does not have any preemptive rights. No shares of preferred stock have been issued.

Common Stock

During the nine months ended September 30, 2015, the Company issued 1,500,000 shares of common stock to 6 consultants for services rendered. The issuances were recorded at fair value ($0.20 per share) and the Company recognized $300,000 in stock based compensation charges.

On August 3, 2015, the Company issued four members of the Board of Directors an aggregate of 600,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. The issuances were recorded at fair value ($0.20 per share) and the Company recognized $110,000 in stock based compensation charges.

Also during the period ended September 30, 2015, the Company completed a closing of a private placement offering (the “Offering”) of 2,705,000 Units, at a purchase price of $0.20 per Unit, each Unit consisting of 1 share of the Company’s common stock, and 1 stock purchase warrants. The warrants are exercisable at $0.40 per warrant into a share of the Company’s common stock and have a maturity of 3 years.

The aggregate gross proceeds from the closing were $541,000 (the Company recorded $332,570 for the fair value of the warrants as a derivative liability see Note 4).

As a result of the OneLove Acquisition and the Hygrow Acquisition, the Company issued 1,450,000 and 300,000 shares of common stock, respectively, to consummate the acquisition.

Warrants

The following is a summary of the Company’s warrant activity during the period from January 1, 2015 to September 30, 2015:

As of September 30, 2015 and December, 31, 2014, the total intrinsic value of options outstanding and exercisable was $0.  

Note 7 — Related Party Transactions

As per the Acquisition agreement, fully described in Note 1, the Company has paid $10,000 of the $50,000 cash flow note and as of September 30, 2015, the balance of the cash flow note is $40,000, payable to a related party.

Note 8 — Commitments and Contingencies

Joint Marketing Agreement with Jasper Group Holdings, Inc.

On June 29, 2015, the Company and Jasper Group Holdings, Inc. (“Jasper”), entered into a Joint Marketing Agreement (the “Joint Marketing Agreement”) to provide services related to website creation for a legal cannabis job posting platform. The website shall include an employee leasing program and allow employers, recruiters and potential employees to communicate through its platform for a fee. All potential employees will be screened with background checks by independent third parties and provided the necessary applications and related materials for individuals to become licensed in the legal cannabis industry on a state by state basis. In accordance with the terms of the Joint Marketing Agreement, Jasper shall invest all funds necessary to form the website.

Pursuant to the Joint Marketing Agreement, the Company issued to Jasper 250,000 common shares upon execution, the shares were issued on July 22, 2015. Additionally, upon the transfer of ownership in the website from Jasper to the Company, the Company shall issue to Jasper an additional 500,000 shares of common stock of the Company.

Proceeds derived from the Company’s website shall be divided as follows: (i) the Company shall retain 75% of the gross proceeds less any sales commissions to third parties collected by the Company for all business that is generated through the website (the “Net Fees”) and pay to Jasper a commission equal to 25% of the Net Fees with payments due within 15 days of the end of each quarter (ii) the Company shall grant to Jasper a warrant for the purchase of one share of common stock of the Company, with an exercise price of $0.75 per share, for every dollar of revenue that the Company earns from the website, up to a maximum of One Million Dollars ($1,000,000).

The initial term of the Joint Marketing Agreement shall be for three (3) years and shall automatically renew for additional three year periods unless terminated by the Company with written notice at least 30 days prior to the expiration of the initial term, or any subsequent term.

Operating Lease

The Company assumed the OneLove lease for storefront property in Colorado, which in November 2012, OneLove extended to an additional three years to run from May 1, 2013 through April 30, 2016. The lease requires base annual rent of $60,000 and the Company’s pro-rata charges for operating expenses and taxes for the first year, with 3% increments thereafter.

Rent expense totaled $31,388 and $- for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively,

Future minimum lease payments under these non-cancelable operating leases are approximately as follows:

Litigation

In the normal course of business, the Company may be involved in legal proceedings, claims and assessments arising in the ordinary course of business. Such matters are subject to many uncertainties, and outcomes are not predictable with assurance. There are no such matters as of September 30, 2015.

Note 9 — Subsequent Events

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

This quarterly report on Form 10-Q and other reports filed by Grow Solutions Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) from time to time with the SEC contain or may contain forward-looking statements and information that are (collectively, the “Filings”) based upon beliefs of, and information currently available to, the Company’s management as well as estimates and assumptions made by Company’s management. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which are only predictions and speak only as of the date hereof. When used in the Filings, the words “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “expect,” “future,” “intend,” “plan,” or the negative of these terms and similar expressions as they relate to the Company or the Company’s management identify forward-looking statements. Such statements reflect the current view of the Company with respect to future events and are subject to risks, uncertainties, assumptions, and other factors, including the risks contained in the “Risk Factors” section of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on May 4, 2015, relating to the Company’s industry, the Company’s operations and results of operations, and any businesses that the Company may acquire. Should one or more of these risks or uncertainties materialize, or should the underlying assumptions prove incorrect, actual results may differ significantly from those anticipated, believed, estimated, expected, intended, or planned.

Although the Company believes that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, the Company cannot guarantee future results, levels of activity, performance, or achievements. Except as required by applicable law, including the securities laws of the United States, the Company does not intend to update any of the forward-looking statements to conform these statements to actual results.

Our financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”). These accounting principles require us to make certain estimates, judgments and assumptions. We believe that the estimates, judgments and assumptions upon which we rely are reasonable based upon information available to us at the time that these estimates, judgments and assumptions are made. These estimates, judgments and assumptions can affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities as of the date of the financial statements as well as the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the periods presented. Our financial statements would be affected to the extent there are material differences between these estimates and actual results. In many cases, the accounting treatment of a particular transaction is specifically dictated by GAAP and does not require management’s judgment in its application. There are also areas in which management’s judgment in selecting any available alternative would not produce a materially different result. The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and notes thereto appearing elsewhere in this report.

Overview

We intend for this discussion to provide information that will assist in understanding our financial statements, the changes in certain key items in those financial statements, and the primary factors that accounted for those changes, as well as how certain accounting principles affect our financial statements.

Business Overview

Grow Solutions Holdings, Inc. is a corporation incorporated under the laws of the State of Nevada (the “Company”). The focus of the Company is to provide comprehensive services within the legal cannabis industry to those growing, processing and dispensing legal cannabis and legal cannabis related products.

The Merger

Effective April 28, 2015, the Company entered into an Acquisition Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Grow Solutions Agreement”) with Grow Solutions, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Grow Solutions”) and LightTouch Vein & Laser Acquisition Corporation, a Delaware corporation and a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company (“LightTouch Acquisition”). Under the terms of the Grow Solutions Agreement, Grow Solutions merged with LightTouch Acquisition and became a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company. The Grow Solutions’ shareholders and certain creditors of the Company received 44,005,000 shares of the Company’s common stock in exchange for all of the issued and outstanding shares of Grow Solutions. Following the closing of the Grow Solutions Agreement, Grow Solutions’ business became the primary focus of the Company and Grow Solutions management assumed control of the management of the Company with the former director of the Company resigning upon closing of the Agreement.

The Grow Solutions Agreement and related transaction documents are included as exhibits to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on February 19, 2015 and is hereby incorporated by reference. All references to the Grow Solutions Agreement and related transaction documents do not purport to be complete and are qualified in their entirety by the text of such exhibits.

Results of Operations

For the Three Months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014

The following table sets forth the summary statements of operations for the three months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014:

Net sales

Net sales increased to $993,077 during the three months ended September 30, 2015, from $0 during the three months ended September 30, 2014. The increase in net sales is primarily related to the Company executing on their expansion strategy and completing the acquisition of One Love in May 2015.

Gross Profit

The gross profit was $287,314 and $0 for the three months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively. This increase is due to the acquisition of One Love during in May 2015.

Selling, general and administrative expenses

Selling, general and administrative expenses for the three months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014 were $539,516 and $18,085, respectively. Selling, general and administrative expenses consisted primarily of professional fees incurred in connection with a private placement of equity securities and reverse merger. In addition, the Company incurred payroll expenses during the three months ended September 30, 2015 due to the operations of One Love.

Other income (expense)

Other income (expense) for the three months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014 was 27,701 and $0, respectively, and consisted primarily of the change in fair value of the derivative liabilities of $39,259 and interest expense of $(12,290) in relation to the amortization of the debt discount on the convertible note.

Net Loss

As a result of the foregoing factors, the net loss for the three months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, was $224,501 and $18,085, respectively.

For the Nine Months ended September 30, 2015 and the Period March 21, 2014 (Inception) through September 30, 2014

The following table sets forth the summary statements of operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and the Period March 21, 2014 (Inception) through September 30, 2014:

Net sales

Net sales increased to $1,318,128 during the nine months ended September 30, 2015, from $0 during the period March 21, 2014 (Inception) through September 30, 2014. The increase in net sales is primarily related to the Company executing on their expansion strategy and completing the acquisition of One Love in May 2015.

Gross Profit

The gross profit was $347,454 for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and $0 for the period March 21, 2014 (Inception) through September 30, 2014. This increase is due to the acquisition of One Love during the nine months ended September 30, 3015.

Selling, general and administrative expenses

Selling, general and administrative expenses for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and the period March 21, 2014 (Inception) through September 30, 2014 were $1,389,906 and $20,070, respectively. Selling, general and administrative expenses consisted primarily of professional fees incurred in connection with a private placement of equity securities and reverse merger. In addition, the Company incurred payroll expenses during the nine months ended September 30, 2015 due to the operations of One Love.

Other income (expense)

Other income (expense) for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and for the period March 21, 2014 (Inception) through September 30, 2014 was $(147,856) and $0, respectively, and consisted primarily of the change in fair value of the derivative liabilities of $(136,298).

Net Loss

As a result of the foregoing factors, the net loss for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and the period March 21, 2014 (Inception) through September 30, 2014, was $1,190,308 and $20,070, respectively.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

The following table summarizes total current assets, liabilities and working capital at September 30, 2015 compared to December 31, 2014:

As of September 30, 2015, we had working capital of $316,380 as compared to working capital of $379,091 as of December 31, 2014, a decrease of $62,711. The decrease in working capital is primarily attributable to a decrease in cash and increases in accounts payable and accrued expenses and a balance due to a related party. These changes were offset by increases in accounts receivable and inventories.

Net Cash

Net cash used in operating activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 was $701,008 compared to $10,070 used in operations for the period March 21, 2014 (inception) through September 30, 2014. This change is primarily attributable to the net loss for the current nine month period offset by non-cash stock-based compensation, change in fair value of derivative liabilities, recapitalization, and accretion of debt discount of $410,000, $136,298, $46,150 and $10,706, respectively. These increases were offset by changes in accounts receivable, inventory and accounts payable of $40,289, $27,301 and $48,761, respectively.

Net cash used in investing activities during the nine months ended September 30, 2015 was $193,313. The Company utilized net cash of $178,711 to complete the acquisitions of One Love and Hygrow during the period. In addition, the Company paid $14,602 for the purchase of machinery and equipment during the nine months ended September 30, 2015. Net cash used in investing activities for the period from March 21, 2014 (inception) to September 30, 2014 was $25,000 paid for a business acquisition. 

Net cash provided from financing activities during the nine months ended September 30, 2015 was $721,000. During the nine months ended September 30, 2015, we received proceeds of $616,000 from the issuance of common stock in a private placement offering under Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act. In addition we received proceeds of $120,000 from a convertible note issued to a third party lender and paid $15,000 in debt issuance costs related to the note. During the period from March 21, 2014 to September 30, 2014 we received proceeds of $70,500 from the issuance of common stock in a private placement.

Liquidity

At September 30, 2015, the Company had a cash balance of $278,954 and for the nine months ended September 30, 2015, the Company had a net loss of $1,190,308. The Company believes it has sufficient cash on hand to meet its operating needs through the next 12 months.

The Acquisition

Effective May 13, 2015 (the “Closing Date”), the Company entered into an Acquisition Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “OneLove Agreement’) with Grow Solutions Acquisition LLC, a Colorado limited liability company and a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company (“Grow Solutions Acquisition”), One Love Garden Supply LLC, a Colorado limited liability company (“OneLove”), and all of the members of OneLove (the “Members”). On the Closing Date, OneLove merged with Grow Solutions Acquisition and became a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company. Under the terms of the OneLove Agreement, the Members received (i) 1,450,000 shares of the Company’s common stock (the “Equity”), (ii) Two Hundred Thousand Dollars (US$200,000) (the “Cash”), and (iii) a cash flow promissory note in the aggregate principal amount of $50,000 issued by OneLove in favor of the Members (the “Cash Flow Note”), whereby each fiscal quarter, upon the Company recording on its financial statements $40,000 in US GAAP Net Income (“Net Income”) from sales of the Company’s products (the “Net Income Threshold”), the Company shall pay to the Members 33% of the Company’s Net Income generated above the Net Income Threshold. The aforementioned obligations owed under the Cash Flow Note shall extinguish upon the earlier of (i) payment(s) by Company in an amount equal to $50,000 in the aggregate or (ii) May 5, 2016 (collectively, the Cash Flow Note, the Equity, and the Cash, the “Consideration”). The Consideration provided to the Members was in exchange for all of the issued and outstanding membership interests of OneLove. Following the Closing Date, OneLove’s indoor and outdoor gardening supply business was acquired by the Company and the Company’s management assumed control of the management of OneLove with the former managing members of OneLove resigning from OneLove upon closing of the OneLove Agreement.

Additionally, on the same date, the Company entered into a two year employment agreement (with three consecutive two year renewal options) with Michael Leago (“Leago”), a former managing member of OneLove (the “Employment Agreement”). Under the terms of the Employment Agreement, Leago serves as the Retail Grow Store Division Head and receives $65,000 per year, payable monthly on the first Monday of each month. Additionally, each fiscal quarter of 2015, upon the Company recording on its financial statements $40,000 in US GAAP gross pretax profits (the “Gross Pretax Profits”) from sales of the Retail Store Division of the Company (the “Pretax Threshold”), the Company shall pay to Leago a cash payment equal to 15% of the Company’s Gross Pretax Profits generated above the Pretax Threshold, but in any event not to exceed $150,000 of bonus for the 2015 calendar year paid to Leago.

The OneLove Agreement and related transaction documents are included as exhibits to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on May 20, 2015 and are hereby incorporated by reference. All references to the OneLove Agreement and related transaction documents do not purport to be complete and are qualified in their entirety by the text of such exhibits.

Joint Marketing Agreement

On June 29, 2015, the Company and Jasper Group Holdings, Inc. (“Jasper”), entered into a Joint Marketing Agreement (the “Joint Marketing Agreement”) whereby Jasper shall provide services related to website creation for a legal cannabis job posting platform. The website shall include an employee leasing program and allow employers, recruiters and potential employees to communicate through its platform for a fee. All potential employees will be screened with background checks by independent third parties and provided the necessary applications and related materials for individuals to become licensed in the legal cannabis industry on a state by state basis. In accordance with the terms of the Joint Marketing Agreement, Jasper shall invest all funds necessary to form the website.

Pursuant to the Joint Marketing Agreement, the Company issued to Jasper 250,000 common shares upon execution. Additionally, upon the transfer of ownership in the website from Jasper to the Company, the Company shall issue to Jasper an additional 500,000 shares of common stock of the Company.

Proceeds derived from the Company’s website shall be divided as follows: (i) the Company shall retain 75% of the gross proceeds less any sales commissions to third parties collected by the Company for all business that is generated through the website (the “Net Fees”) and pay to Jasper a commission equal to 25% of the Net Fees with payments due within 15 days of the end of each quarter (ii) the Company shall grant to Jasper a warrant for the purchase of one share of common stock of the Company, with an exercise price of $0.75 per share, for every dollar of revenue that the Company earns from the website, up to a maximum of One Million Dollars ($1,000,000).

The initial term of the Joint Marketing Agreement shall be for three (3) years and shall automatically renew for additional three year periods unless terminated by the Company with written notice at least 30 days prior to the expiration of the initial term, or any subsequent term.

Debt and Equity Financing

On September 2, 2015 (the “Effective Date”), Grow Solutions Holdings, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”), entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement (the “SPA”) to issue and sell a Convertible Promissory Note (the “Note” and together with the SPA, the “Transaction Documents”) to an institutional investor (the “Investor”), in the principal amount of $120,000.00 (the “Principal Amount”). Pursuant to the Transaction Documents, on or about September 3, 2015 the Company received $120,000 in funding from the Investor (the “Closing Date”). The Company’s issuance of the securities to the Investor pursuant to the SPA are exempt from registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), pursuant to Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act and/or Rule 506 of Regulation D promulgated under the Securities Act.

The Note shall mature on June 2, 2016 (the “Maturity Date”) and shall accrue interest at an annual rate equal to 12%. The Principal Amount and interest shall be paid on the Maturity Date (or sooner as provided in the Note), in cash or, in shares of the Company’s common stock, par value $0.001 per share (the “Common Stock”). In accordance with the terms of the Note, the Investor shall be entitled to convert a portion or all of the Principal Amount and interest due and outstanding under the Note into shares of Common Stock equal to 48% of the average of the lowest three (3) trading prices during the twenty (20) trading day period ending on the latest complete trading day prior to the conversion date.

Additionally, on September 8, 2015, the Company sold 425,000 units, at a purchase price of $0.20 per unit to one investor (the “Subscription”). Each unit consisting of one share of the Company’s common stock, and one common stock purchase warrant. The warrants are exercisable at $0.40 per warrant into a share of the Company’s common stock and have a maturity of three years. The aggregate gross proceeds from the Subscription was $85,000.

Hygrow Asset Purchase

Effective September 23, 2015 (the “Closing Date”), Grow Solutions Holdings, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”) entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement (the “APA”) by and among One Love Garden Supply LLC, a Colorado limited liability company and a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company (“Buyer”), and D&B Industries, LLC, a Colorado limited liability company doing business as Hygrow (“Seller”). On the Closing Date, the Buyer purchased and the Seller sold all of the assets, rights, properties, and business of the Seller including certain debts of the Seller (the “Assets”). Under the terms and conditions of the APA, and for full consideration of the transfer of such Assets to the Buyer on the Closing Date, Buyer issued to Seller three hundred thousand (300,000) shares of common stock of the Company and a payment from Buyer to Seller in the amount of $5,200 in cash (the “Consideration”). Following the Closing Date, the Assets were acquired by the Buyer and the Company’s management assumed control of the management of the Seller with the former managing members of the Seller resigning from the Seller upon closing of the APA. All references to the APA do not purport to be complete and are qualified in their entirety by the text of Exhibit 10.1 hereto.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

As of September 30, 2015, the Company had no off-balance sheet arrangements.

Going Concern

The consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern, which contemplates continuity of operations, realization of assets, and liquidation of liabilities in the normal course of business.

The Company is attempting to further implement its business plan and generate sufficient revenue; however, the Company's cash position may not be sufficient to support the Company's daily operations which raises substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. While the Company believes in the viability of its strategy to further implement its business plan and generate sufficient revenue and in its ability to raise additional funds by way of a public or private offering, there can be no assurances to that effect. The ability of the Company to continue as a going concern is dependent upon its ability to further implement its business plan and generate sufficient revenue and its ability to raise additional funds by way of a public or private offering.

The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments related to the recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts or the amounts and classification of liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.

Critical Accounting Policies

We believe that the following accounting policies are the most critical to aid you in fully understanding and evaluating this “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation.”

Goodwill

Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of assets acquired, including other definite-lived intangible assets. Goodwill is not amortized, but reviewed annually for impairment or upon the occurrence of events or changes in circumstances that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of the reporting unit below its carrying amount. There were no impairment charges recognized during the period.

Derivative Liability

The Company evaluates its convertible debt, options, warrants or other contracts, if any, to determine if those contracts or embedded components of those contracts qualify as derivatives to be separately accounted for in accordance with paragraph 815-10-05-4 and Section 815-40-25 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. The result of this accounting treatment is that the fair value of the embedded derivative is marked-to-market each balance sheet date and recorded as either an asset or a liability. In the event that the fair value is recorded as a liability, the change in fair value is recorded in the consolidated statement of operations as other income or expense. Upon conversion, exercise or cancellation of a derivative instrument, the instrument is marked to fair value at the date of conversion, exercise or cancellation and then the related fair value is reclassified to equity.

In circumstances where the embedded conversion option in a convertible instrument is required to be bifurcated and there are also other embedded derivative instruments in the convertible instrument that are required to be bifurcated, the bifurcated derivative instruments are accounted for as a single, compound derivative instrument.

The classification of derivative instruments, including whether such instruments should be recorded as liabilities or as equity, is re-assessed at the end of each reporting period. Equity instruments that are initially classified as equity that become subject to reclassification are reclassified to liability at the fair value of the instrument on the reclassification date. Derivative instrument liabilities will be classified in the balance sheet as current or non-current based on whether or not net-cash settlement of the derivative instrument is expected within 12 months of the balance sheet date.

The Company adopted Section 815-40-15 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“Section 815-40-15”) to determine whether an instrument (or an embedded feature) is indexed to the Company’s own stock.  Section 815-40-15 provides that an entity should use a two-step approach to evaluate whether an equity-linked financial instrument (or embedded feature) is indexed to its own stock, including evaluating the instrument’s contingent exercise and settlement provisions.  

The Company utilizes the binomial method in order to marks market the fair value of the derivative at each balance sheet date and records the change in the fair value of the derivative as other income or expense in the consolidated statements of operations.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The carrying amounts of cash, accounts payable, accrued expenses, and convertible notes payable approximate fair value due to the short-term nature of these instruments.

The Company measures the fair value of financial assets and liabilities based on the guidance of Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 820, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures,” which defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements.

ASC 820 defines fair value as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. ASC 820 also establishes a fair value hierarchy, which requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. 

Fair value measurements are categorized using a valuation hierarchy for disclosure of the inputs used to measure fair value, which prioritize the inputs into three broad levels: 

Equity–based compensation

The Company recognizes compensation expense for all equity–based payments in accordance with ASC 718 “Compensation – Stock Compensation”. Under fair value recognition provisions, the Company recognizes equity–based compensation net of an estimated forfeiture rate and recognizes compensation cost only for those shares expected to vest over the requisite service period of the award.

Restricted stock awards are granted at the discretion of the Company. These awards are restricted as to the transfer of ownership and generally vest over the requisite service periods, typically over a five year period (vesting on a straight–line basis). The fair value of a stock award is equal to the fair market value of a share of Company stock on the grant date.

The fair value of an option award is estimated on the date of grant using the Black–Scholes option valuation model. The Black–Scholes option valuation model requires the development of assumptions that are inputs into the model. These assumptions are the value of the underlying share, the expected stock volatility, the risk–free interest rate, the expected life of the option, the dividend yield on the underlying stock and the expected forfeiture rate. Expected volatility is benchmarked against similar companies in a similar industry over the expected option life and other appropriate factors. Risk–free interest rates are calculated based on continuously compounded risk–free rates for the appropriate term. The dividend yield is assumed to be zero as the Company has never paid or declared any cash dividends on its Common stock and does not intend to pay dividends on its Common stock in the foreseeable future. The expected forfeiture rate is estimated based on management’s best estimate. 

Determining the appropriate fair value model and calculating the fair value of equity–based payment awards requires the input of the subjective assumptions described above. The assumptions used in calculating the fair value of equity–based payment awards represent management’s best estimates, which involve inherent uncertainties and the application of management’s judgment. As a result, if factors change and the Company uses different assumptions, our equity–based compensation could be materially different in the future. In addition, the Company is required to estimate the expected forfeiture rate and recognize expense only for those shares expected to vest. If the Company’s actual forfeiture rate is materially different from its estimate, the equity–based compensation could be significantly different from what the Company has recorded in the current period. 

The Company accounts for share–based payments granted to non–employees in accordance with ASC 505-40, “Equity Based Payments to Non–Employees”. The Company determines the fair value of the stock–based payment as either the fair value of the consideration received or the fair value of the equity instruments issued, whichever is more reliably measurable. If the fair value of the equity instruments issued is used, it is measured using the stock price and other measurement assumptions as of the earlier of either (1) the date at which a commitment for performance by the counterparty to earn the equity instruments is reached, or (2) the date at which the counterparty’s performance is complete. The fair value of the equity instruments is re-measured each reporting period over the requisite service period.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

Management does not believe that any recently issued, but not yet effective, accounting standards if currently adopted would have a material effect on the accompanying financial statements.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

We do not hold any derivative instruments and do not engage in any hedging activities.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures.

(a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures.

In connection with the preparation of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2015, our Principal Executive Officer (“PEO”) and Principal Financial Officer (“PFO”) evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on that evaluation, our PEO and PFO concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report were not effective such that the information required to be disclosed by us in reports filed under the Exchange Act is (i) recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms and (ii) accumulated and communicated to our Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding disclosure. A controls system cannot provide absolute assurance, however, that the objectives of the controls system are met, and no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within a company have been detected.

(b) Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting.

There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting, as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act, during our most recently completed fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings.

We are currently not involved in any litigation that we believe could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations. There is no action, suit, proceeding, inquiry or investigation before or by any court, public board, government agency, self-regulatory organization or body pending or, to the knowledge of the executive officers of our company or any of our subsidiaries, threatened against or affecting our company, our common stock, any of our subsidiaries or of our companies or our subsidiaries’ officers or directors in their capacities as such, in which an adverse decision could have a material adverse effect.

Item 1A. Risk Factors.

We believe there are no changes that constitute material changes from the risk factors previously disclosed in our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on May 4, 2015.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.

During the period ended June 30, 2015, the Company completed a closing of a private placement offering of 2,025,000 units, at a purchase price of $0.20 per unit to ten investors (the “Offering”). Each unit consisting of one share of the Company’s common stock, and one common stock purchase warrant. The warrants are exercisable at $0.40 per warrant into a share of the Company’s common stock and have a maturity of three years. The aggregate gross proceeds from the closing were $405,000.

On September 2, 2015 (the “Effective Date”), the Company, entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement (the “SPA”) to issue and sell a Convertible Promissory Note (the “Note” and together with the SPA, the “Transaction Documents”) to an institutional investor (the “Investor”), in the principal amount of $120,000.00 (the “Principal Amount”). In accordance with the terms of the Note, the Investor shall be entitled to convert a portion or all of the Principal Amount and interest due and outstanding under the Note into shares of common stock equal to 48% of the average of the lowest three (3) trading prices during the twenty (20) trading day period ending on the latest complete trading day prior to the conversion date. Pursuant to the Transaction Documents, on or about September 3, 2015 the Company received $120,000 in funding from the Investor (the “Closing Date”).

Additionally, on September 8, 2015, the Company sold 425,000 units, at a purchase price of $0.20 per unit to one investor (the “Subscription”). Each unit consisting of one share of the Company’s common stock, and one common stock purchase warrant. The warrants are exercisable at $0.40 per warrant into a share of the Company’s common stock and have a maturity of three years. The aggregate gross proceeds from the Subscription was $85,000.

On September 23, 2015, the Company issued three hundred thousand (300,000) shares of common stock of the Company to D&B Industries, LLC, a Colorado limited liability company doing business as Hygrow, as consideration for all of its assets, rights, properties, and business, including certain debts of D&B Industries, LLC.

These securities were not registered under the Securities Act, but qualified for exemption under Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act. The securities were exempt from registration under Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act because the issuance of such securities by the Company did not involve a “public offering,” as defined in Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act, due to the insubstantial number of persons involved in the transaction, size of the offering, and manner of the offering and number of securities offered. The Company did not undertake an offering in which it sold a high number of securities to a high number of investors. In addition, the Investors had the necessary investment intent as required by Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act since they agreed to, and received, the securities bearing a legend stating that such securities are restricted pursuant to Rule 144 of the Securities Act. This restriction ensures that these securities would not be immediately redistributed into the market and therefore not be part of a “public offering.” Based on an analysis of the above factors, the Company has met the requirements to qualify for exemption under Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act.

Other than as disclosed above, there were no unregistered sales of the Company’s equity securities during the quarter ended September 30, 2015, other than those previously reported in a Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q or Current Report on Form 8-K.

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities.

There has been no default in the payment of principal, interest, sinking or purchase fund installment, or any other material default, with respect to any indebtedness of the Company.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures.

Not applicable.

Item 5. Other Information.

Not applicable.

Item 6. Exhibits.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Exchange Act, the registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

13