GSE SYSTEMS INC - Quarter Report: 2006 March (Form 10-Q)
UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON,
D.C. 20549
FORM
10-Q
[X]
|
Quarterly
Report Pursuant
to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 for
the
Quarterly Period Ended March 31,
2006.
|
or
[ ] |
Transition
Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of
1934 for the Transition Period from
to .
|
Commission
File Number: 0-26494
GSE
SYSTEMS, INC.
(Exact
name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware
|
52-1868008
|
||
(State
of incorporation)
|
(I.R.S.
Employer Identification No.)
|
7133
Rutherford Rd., Suite 200, Baltimore, MD 21244
(Address
of principal executive office and zip code)
Registrant's
telephone number, including area code: (410)
277-3740
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to
be
filed by Sections 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the
preceding 12 months or for such shorter period that the Registrant was
required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [ X ] No [
]
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to
be
filed by Sections 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required
to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements
for
the past 90 days. Yes [ X ] No [ ]
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated
filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
(Check one):
Large
accelerated filer [ ]
|
Accelerated
filer [ ]
|
Non-accelerated
filer [X]
|
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in rule
12(b)-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes [ ] No [X]
The
number of shares outstanding of each of the registrant’s Common Stock and Series
A Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock as of March 15, 2006:
Common
Stock, par value $.01 per share
|
8,999,706
shares
|
Series
A Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock, par value $.01 per share
|
42,500
shares
|
1
GSE
SYSTEMS, INC.
QUARTERLY
REPORT ON FORM 10-Q
INDEX
PAGE
|
||
PART
I.
|
FINANCIAL
INFORMATION
|
3
|
Item
1.
|
Financial
Statements:
|
|
Consolidated
Balance Sheets as of March 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005
|
3
|
|
Consolidated
Statements of Operations for the Three Months Ended
March
31, 2006 and March 31, 2005
|
4
|
|
Consolidated
Statements of Comprehensive Loss for the Three Months Ended
March
31, 2006 and
March 31, 2005
|
5
|
|
Consolidated
Statement of Changes in Stockholders' Equity for the Three
Months
Ended March 31, 2006
|
6
|
|
Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows for the Three Months Ended
March
31, 2006 and March 31, 2005
|
7
|
|
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements
|
8
|
|
Item
2.
|
Management's
Discussion and Analysis of Results of Operations and Financial
Condition
|
19
|
Item
3.
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
|
28
|
Item
4.
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
29
|
PART
II.
|
OTHER
INFORMATION
|
32
|
Item
1.
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
32
|
Item 1 |
A.
Risk Factors
|
32
|
Item
2.
|
Unregistered
Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
|
32
|
Item
3.
|
Defaults
Upon Senior Securities
|
32
|
Item
4.
|
Submission
of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
|
32
|
Item
5.
|
Other
Information
|
32
|
Item
6.
|
Exhibits
|
32
|
SIGNATURES
|
33
|
2
PART
I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
|||||||
Item
1. Financial Statements
|
|||||||
GSE
SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
|||||||
CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEETS
|
|||||||
(in
thousands, except share data)
|
|||||||
|
Unaudited
|
||||||
|
March
31, 2006
|
December
31, 2005
|
|||||
ASSETS
|
|||||||
Current
assets:
|
|||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
$
|
104
|
$
|
1,321
|
|||
Contract
receivables
|
9,199
|
6,896
|
|||||
Prepaid
expenses and other current assets
|
470
|
376
|
|||||
Total
current assets
|
9,773
|
8,593
|
|||||
Equipment
and leasehold improvements, net
|
322
|
329
|
|||||
Software
development costs, net
|
862
|
940
|
|||||
Goodwill
|
1,739
|
1,739
|
|||||
Other
assets
|
1,190
|
381
|
|||||
Total
assets
|
$
|
13,886
|
$
|
11,982
|
|||
LIABILITIES
AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
|
|||||||
Current
liabilities:
|
|||||||
Current
portion of long-term debt
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
1,182
|
|||
Accounts
payable
|
2,226
|
3,019
|
|||||
Due
to GP Strategies Corporation
|
213
|
542
|
|||||
Accrued
expenses
|
1,321
|
1,612
|
|||||
Accrued
compensation and payroll taxes
|
1,310
|
1,226
|
|||||
Billings
in excess of revenue earned
|
2,834
|
1,177
|
|||||
Accrued
warranty
|
672
|
754
|
|||||
Other
current liabilities
|
-
|
6
|
|||||
Total
current liabilities
|
8,576
|
9,518
|
|||||
Long-term
debt
|
403
|
869
|
|||||
Other
liabilities
|
-
|
698
|
|||||
Total
liabilities
|
8,979
|
11,085
|
|||||
Commitments
and contingencies
|
|||||||
Stockholders'
equity:
|
|||||||
Series
A convertible preferred stock $.01 par value,
|
|||||||
2,000,000
shares authorized, shares issued and
|
-
|
-
|
|||||
outstanding
42,500 in 2006 and none in 2005
|
|||||||
Common
stock $.01 par value, 18,000,000 shares authorized,
|
|||||||
shares
issued and outstanding 8,999,706 in 2006 and 2005
|
90
|
90
|
|||||
Additional
paid-in capital
|
36,223
|
30,915
|
|||||
Accumulated
deficit - at formation
|
(5,112
|
)
|
(5,112
|
)
|
|||
Accumulated
deficit - since formation
|
(25,161
|
)
|
(23,839
|
)
|
|||
Accumulated
other comprehensive loss
|
(1,133
|
)
|
(1,157
|
)
|
|||
Total
stockholders' equity
|
4,907
|
897
|
|||||
Total
liabilities and stockholders' equity
|
$
|
13,886
|
$
|
11,982
|
|||
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial
statements.
|
3
GSE
SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
|||||||
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
|
|||||||
(in
thousands, except per share data)
|
|||||||
(Unaudited)
|
|||||||
|
Three
months ended
|
||||||
|
March
31,
|
||||||
2006
|
2005
|
||||||
Contract
revenue
|
$
|
5,584
|
$
|
6,293
|
|||
Cost
of revenue
|
4,133
|
5,238
|
|||||
Gross
profit
|
1,451
|
1,055
|
|||||
Operating
expenses:
|
|||||||
Selling,
general and administrative
|
1,021
|
1,830
|
|||||
Administrative
charges from GP Strategies
|
171
|
171
|
|||||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
47
|
77
|
|||||
Total
operating expenses
|
1,239
|
2,078
|
|||||
Operating
income (loss)
|
212
|
(1,023
|
)
|
||||
Interest
expense, net
|
(157
|
)
|
(17
|
)
|
|||
Loss
on early extinguishment of debt
|
(1,428
|
)
|
-
|
||||
Other
income (expense), net
|
51
|
(51
|
)
|
||||
Loss
before income taxes
|
(1,322
|
)
|
(1,091
|
)
|
|||
Provision
(benefit) for income taxes
|
-
|
(49
|
)
|
||||
Net
loss
|
(1,322
|
)
|
(1,042
|
)
|
|||
Preferred
stock dividends
|
(29
|
)
|
-
|
||||
Net
loss attributed to common shareholders
|
$
|
(1,351
|
)
|
$
|
(1,042
|
)
|
|
Basic
loss per common share
|
$
|
(0.15
|
)
|
$
|
(0.12
|
)
|
|
Diluted
loss per common share
|
$
|
(0.15
|
)
|
$
|
(0.12
|
)
|
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial
statements.
|
|||||||
4
GSE
SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
|||||||
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE LOSS
|
|||||||
(in
thousands)
|
|||||||
(Unaudited)
|
|||||||
|
Three
months ended
|
||||||
|
March
31,
|
||||||
2006
|
2005
|
||||||
Net
loss
|
$
|
(1,322
|
)
|
$
|
(1,042
|
)
|
|
Foreign
currency translation adjustment
|
24
|
(158
|
)
|
||||
Comprehensive
loss
|
$
|
(1,298
|
)
|
$
|
(1,200
|
)
|
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial
statements.
|
5
GSE
SYSTEMS, INC, AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(in
thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Accumulated
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Preferred
|
Common
|
Additional
|
Accumulated
Deficit
|
Other
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock
|
Stock
|
Paid-in
|
At
|
Since
|
Comprehensive
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Shares
|
Amount
|
Shares
|
Amount
|
Capital
|
Formation
|
Formation
|
Loss
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Balance,
January 1, 2006
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
9,000
|
$
|
90
|
$
|
30,915
|
$
|
(5,112
|
)
|
$
|
(23,839
|
)
|
$
|
(1,157
|
)
|
$
|
897
|
|||||||||
Foreign
currency translation adjustment
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
24
|
24
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Issuance
of preferred stock
|
43
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
3,386
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
3,856
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Vesting
of employee stock options
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
10
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
10
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Issuance
of warrants
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
1,941
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
1,471
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Preferred
stock dividends payable
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(29
|
)
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
(29
|
)
|
||||||||||||||||
Net
loss
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(1,322
|
)
|
-
|
(1,322
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||||
Balance,
March 31, 2006
|
43
|
$
|
-
|
9,000
|
$
|
90
|
$
|
36,223
|
$
|
(5,112
|
)
|
$
|
(25,161
|
)
|
$
|
(1,133
|
)
|
$
|
4,907
|
|||||||||
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial
statements.
|
6
GSE
SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
|||||||
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
|
|||||||
(in
thousands)
|
|||||||
(Unaudited)
|
|||||||
Three
months ended
|
|||||||
March
31,
|
|||||||
2006
|
2005
|
||||||
Cash
flows from operating activities:
|
|||||||
Net
loss
|
$
|
(1,322
|
)
|
$
|
(1,042
|
)
|
|
Adjustments
to reconcile net loss to net cash
|
|||||||
used
in operating activities:
|
|||||||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
212
|
192
|
|||||
Loss
on extinguishment of debt
|
1,428
|
-
|
|||||
Employee
stock based compensation expense
|
10 | - | |||||
Changes
in assets and liabilities:
|
|||||||
Contract
receivables
|
(2,303
|
)
|
149
|
||||
Prepaid
expenses and other assets
|
(37
|
)
|
(97
|
)
|
|||
Accounts
payable, accrued compensation and accrued expenses
|
(1,046
|
)
|
(320
|
)
|
|||
Due
to GP Strategies Corporation
|
(329
|
)
|
280
|
||||
Billings
in excess of revenues earned
|
1,657
|
(520
|
)
|
||||
Accrued
warranty reserves
|
(82
|
)
|
8
|
||||
Other
liabilities
|
29
|
(43
|
)
|
||||
Net
cash used in operating activities
|
(1,783
|
)
|
(1,393
|
)
|
|||
Cash
flows from investing activities:
|
|||||||
Capital
expenditures
|
(39
|
)
|
(67
|
)
|
|||
Capitalized
software development costs
|
(29
|
)
|
(91
|
)
|
|||
Net
cash used in investing activities
|
(68
|
)
|
(158
|
)
|
|||
Cash
flows from financing activities:
|
|||||||
Increase
(decrease) in borrowings under lines of credit
|
(779
|
)
|
700
|
||||
Proceeds
from issuance of common stock
|
-
|
100
|
|||||
Net
proceeds from issuance of preferred stock
|
3,856
|
-
|
|||||
Deferred
financing costs
|
(448
|
)
|
-
|
||||
Paydown
of note payable
|
(2,000
|
)
|
-
|
||||
Other
financing activities, net
|
-
|
(6
|
)
|
||||
Net
cash provided by financing activities
|
629
|
794
|
|||||
Effect
of exchange rate changes on cash
|
5
|
(17
|
)
|
||||
Net
decrease in cash and cash equivalents
|
(1,217
|
)
|
(774
|
)
|
|||
Cash
and cash equivalents at beginning of year
|
1,321
|
868
|
|||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at end of period
|
$
|
104
|
$
|
94
|
|||
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial
statements.
|
7
GSE
SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For
the Three Months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005
(Unaudited)
1.
|
Basis
of Presentation
and Revenue Recognition
|
Basis
of Presentation
The
consolidated financial statements included herein have been prepared by GSE
Systems, Inc. (the “Company” or “GSE”) without independent audit. In the opinion
of the Company's management, all adjustments and reclassifications of a normal
and recurring nature necessary to present fairly the financial position,
results
of operations and cash flows for the periods presented have been made. Certain
information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements
prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles
(“GAAP”) have been condensed or omitted. These consolidated financial statements
should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements
and
notes thereto included in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
period ended December 31, 2005 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on March 31, 2005.
On
June
21, 2005, the Board of Directors of GP Strategies Corporation (“GP Strategies”)
approved plans to spin-off its 57% interest in GSE through a special dividend
to
the GP Strategies’ stockholders. On September 30, 2005, the GP Strategies’
stockholders received 0.283075 share of GSE common stock for each share of
GP
Strategies common stock or Class B stock held on the record date of September
19, 2005. Following the spin-off, GP Strategies ceased to have any ownership
interest in GSE. GP Strategies continues to provide corporate support services
to GSE, including accounting, finance, human resources, legal, network support
and tax pursuant to a Management Services Agreement which expires on December
31, 2006.
The
Company has only one reportable segment. The Company has a wide range of
knowledge of simulation systems and the processes those systems are intended
to
control and model. The Company’s knowledge is concentrated heavily in simulation
technology and model development. The Company is primarily engaged in simulation
for the power generation industry, the process industries, and the US
Government. Contracts typically range from 18 months to three years.
On
February 28, 2006, the Company and Dolphin Equity Partners, LP (“Dolphin”)
entered into a Cancellation and Warrant Exchange Agreement (the “Cancellation
Agreement”) under which Dolphin agreed to cancel its Senior Subordinated Secured
Convertible Promissory Note and cancel its outstanding warrant to purchase
380,952 shares of GSE common stock at an exercise price of $2.22 per share.
In
exchange for Dolphin’s agreement to enter into the Cancellation Agreement and
for the participation of Dolphin Offshore Partners, LP in the Preferred Stock
transaction discussed below, the Company repaid the Dolphin Note and agreed
to
issue a new warrant to purchase 900,000 shares of GSE common stock at an
exercise price of $0.67 per share (the “Dolphin Warrant”). Dolphin must exercise
the new warrant promptly after the Company certifies to Dolphin on or after
May
30, 2006 (the “Mandatory Exercise Date”) that, among other things, the current
stock price shall not be less than $1.25 on the Mandatory Exercise Date and
that
the average of the current stock prices for each trading day of the 30 calendar
day period up to and including the Mandatory Exercise Date is not less than
$1.25. At the date of issuance, the fair value of the Dolphin Warrant was
$868,000, as established using the Black-Scholes Model, and was recorded
in
paid-in capital with the offset recorded as loss on extinguishment of debt.
In
conjunction with the early payoff of the Dolphin Note and the cancellation
of
the 380,952 warrants, the Company wrote off the remaining unamortized Original
Issue Discount of $1.1 million, wrote off the remaining unamortized deferred
financing charges of $185,000, recognized a credit of $698,000 from the
write-off of the liabilities related to the Dolphin Note conversion feature
and
the related warrants and took an $868,000 charge for the value of the 900,000
new warrants issued to Dolphin. The total loss on extinguishment of the Dolphin
Note and the cancellation of the related warrants totaled $1.4 million.
8
On
February 28, 2006, the Company raised $3.9 million, net of associated fees
of
$395,000, through the sale of 42,500 shares of Series A Cumulative Convertible
Preferred Stock and Warrants by means of a private placement to “accredited
investors”, as that term is used in rules and regulations of the Securities and
Exchange Commission. The Convertible Preferred Stock is convertible at any
time
into a total of 2,401,130 shares of GSE common stock at a conversion price
of
$1.77 per share. The conversion price was equal to 110% of the closing price
of
the Company’s Common Stock on February 28, 2006, the date the sale of the
Convertible Preferred Stock was completed. Each investor received a five-year
warrant to purchase GSE common stock equal to 20% of the shares they would
receive from the conversion of the Convertible Preferred Stock, at an exercise
price of $1.77. In total, the Company issued warrants to purchase a total
of
480,226 shares of GSE common stock. At
the
date of issuance, the fair value of the warrants was $342,000 and the fair
value
of the preferred stock was $3.9 million. The fair value of the warrants and
the
preferred stock was determined through the use of the relative fair value
method, in which the $4.25 million gross proceeds was allocated based upon
the
fair values of the warrants, as determined by using the Black-Scholes Model,
and
the preferred stock, as determined by an independent appraisal. The
Convertible Preferred Stock holders are entitled to an 8% cumulative dividend,
payable on a semiannual basis every June 30 and December 30. If the Company
does
not make two consecutive dividend payments on the dates such payments are
due,
there will be an additional 30% warrant coverage of five-year warrants at
a
conversion price of $1.77 per share. At any time after March 1, 2007, the
Company has the right to convert the Preferred Stock into shares of GSE common
stock when the average of the current stock price during the twenty trading
days
immediately prior to the date of such conversion exceeds 200% of the Series
A
Conversion Price. The holders of the Convertible Preferred Stock are entitled
to
vote on all matters submitted to the stockholders for a vote, together with
the
holders of the voting common stock, all voting together as a single class.
The
holders of the Convertible Preferred Stock are entitled to the number of
votes
equal to the number of GSE common stock that they would receive upon conversion
of their Convertible Preferred Stock.
The
Company paid the placement agent for the Convertible Preferred Stock and
Warrants 6% of the gross proceeds received by the Company from the offering
($255,000) plus five-year warrants to purchase 150,000 shares of the Company’s
common stock at an exercise price of $1.77 per share. In addition to the
placement agent fee, the Company paid $140,000 of other transaction fees
related
to the offering. At the date of issuance, the fair value of the placement
agent
warrants was $128,000, as established using the Black-Scholes Model, and
was
recorded in paid-in capital, with the offset recognized as a reduction of
the
preferred stock proceeds.
The
proceeds were used to payoff the Dolphin Note and the Company’s line of credit
balance and for other working capital purposes.
On
March
7, 2006, the Company entered into a new loan and security agreement with
Laurus
Master Fund, Ltd. and terminated its $1.5 million bank line of credit. The
new
agreement established a $5.0 million line of credit for the Company. The
line is
collateralized by substantially all of the Company’s assets and provides for
borrowings up to 90% of eligible accounts receivable, and 40% of eligible
unbilled receivables (up to a maximum of $1.0 million). The interest rate
on
this line of credit is based on the prime rate plus 200-basis points, with
interest only payments due monthly. There are no financial covenant requirements
under the new agreement. At March 31, 2006, the Company’s available borrowing
base was $2.7 million of which $403,000 had been utilized. The credit facility
expires on March 6, 2008. The Company issued to Laurus Master Fund, Ltd.
a
warrant to purchase up to 367,647 shares of GSE common stock at an exercise
price of $.01 per share. At the date of issuance, the fair value of the Laurus
warrant, which was established using the Black-Scholes Model, was $603,000
and
was recorded as paid-in capital with the offset recorded as deferred financing
charges. Deferred financing charges are classified as an other asset and
are
amortized over the term of the credit facility through a charge to interest
expense.
The
preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management
to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets
and
liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date
of
the financial statements as well as reported amounts of revenues and expenses
during the reporting period. The Company’s most significant estimates relate to
revenue recognition, capitalization of software development costs, and the
recoverability of deferred tax assets. Actual results could differ from these
estimates and those differences could be material.
9
As
the
Company recognizes revenue under the percentage-of-completion method, it
provides an accrual for estimated future warranty costs based on historical
and
projected claims experience. The Company’s long-term contracts generally provide
for a one-year warranty on parts, labor and any bug fixes as it relates to
software embedded in the systems.
The
Company’s system design contracts do not provide for “post customer support
service” (PCS) in terms of software upgrades, software enhancements or telephone
support. In order to obtain PCS, the customers must purchase a separate
contract. Such PCS arrangements are generally for a one-year period renewable
annually and include customer support, unspecified software upgrades, and
maintenance releases. The Company recognizes revenue from these contracts
ratably over the life of the agreements in accordance with Statement of Position
97-2 Software
Revenue Recognition.
Revenue
from the sale of software licenses for the Company’s modeling tools which do not
require significant modifications or customization are recognized when the
license agreement is signed, the license fee is fixed and determinable, delivery
has occurred, and collection is considered probable.
Revenues
from certain consulting or training contracts are recognized on a
time-and-material basis. For time-and-material type contracts, revenue is
recognized based on hours incurred at a contracted labor rate plus
expenses.
For
the
three months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005, one customer (Battelle’s Pacific
Northwest National Laboratory) accounted for approximately 14.4% and 32.3%,
respectively, of the Company’s consolidated revenue. The Pacific Northwest
National Laboratory is the purchasing agent for the Department of Energy
and the
numerous projects GSE performs in Eastern and Central Europe. The Emirates
Simulation Academy, LLC accounted for 13.4% of the Company’s consolidated
revenue for the three months ended March 31, 2006 (the Company had no revenue
from ESA in the first quarter 2005).
Contract
receivables unbilled totaled $3.5 million and $3.7 million as of March 31,
2006
and December 31, 2005, respectively. In April 2006 the Company billed $609,000
of the unbilled amounts.
2.
|
Basic
and Diluted Loss
Per Common Share
|
Basic
loss per share is based on the weighted average number of outstanding common
shares for the period. Diluted loss per share adjusts the weighted average
shares outstanding for the potential dilution that could occur if stock options,
warrants or convertible preferred stock were exercised or converted into common
stock.
10
The
number of common shares and common share equivalents used in the determination
of basic and diluted loss per share were as follows:
(in
thousands, except for share amounts)
|
Three
months ended
|
||||||
|
March
31,
|
||||||
2006
|
2005
|
||||||
Numerator:
|
|||||||
Net
Loss
|
$
|
(1,322
|
)
|
$
|
(1,042
|
)
|
|
Preferred
stock dividends
|
(29
|
)
|
-
|
||||
Net
loss attributed to common stockholders
|
$
|
(1,351
|
)
|
$
|
(1,042
|
)
|
|
Denominator:
|
|||||||
Weighted-average
shares outstanding for basic
|
|||||||
earnings
per share
|
9,101,830
|
8,996,373
|
|||||
Effect
of dilutive securities:
|
|||||||
Employee
stock options, warrants,
|
|||||||
options
outside the plan and convertible
|
|||||||
preferred
stock
|
-
|
-
|
|||||
Adjusted
weighted-average shares outstanding
|
|||||||
and
assumed conversions for diluted
|
|||||||
earnings
per share
|
9,101,830
|
8,996,373
|
|||||
Shares
related to dilutive securities excluded
|
|||||||
because
inclusion would be anti-dilutive
|
3,477,154
|
1,361,338
|
|||||
The
net
loss for the three months ended March 31, 2006 was increased by preferred stock
dividends of $29,000 in calculating the per share amounts. For the three months
ended March 31, 2005, there were no preferred stock dividends. Conversion of
the
stock options, warrants and convertible preferred stock was not assumed for
the
three months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005 because the impact was anti-dilutive,
with the exception of the 367,647 warrants issued to Laurus Master Funds Ltd.
which
are
already included in basic weighted-average shares outstanding since their
exercise price per share is $0.01.
3.
|
Software
Development Costs
|
Certain
computer software development costs are capitalized in the accompanying
consolidated balance sheets. Capitalization of computer software development
costs begins upon the establishment of technological feasibility. Capitalization
ceases and amortization of capitalized costs begins when the software product
is
commercially available for general release to customers. Amortization of
capitalized computer software development costs is included in cost of revenue
and is determined using the straight-line method over the remaining estimated
economic life of the product, not to exceed five years.
Software
development costs capitalized were $29,000 and $91,000 for the quarters ended
March 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. Total amortization expense was $107,000
and $115,000 for the quarters ended March 31, 2006 and 2005,
respectively.
11
4.
|
Stock-Based
Compensation
|
Accounting
Standard Adopted
In
December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement
of Financial Accounting Standard (SFAS) No. 123R, Share-Based
Payment
(SFAS
No. 123R), which revises SFAS No. 123, Accounting
for Stock-Based Compensation (SFAS
No.
123), and supersedes Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, Accounting
for Stock Issued to Employees
(APB
No. 25), and requires companies to recognize compensation expense for all
equity-based compensation awards issued to employees that are expected to vest.
The Company adopted SFAS No. 123R on January 1, 2006, using the Modified
Prospective Application method without restatement of prior periods. Under
this
method, the Company would begin to amortize compensation cost for the remaining
portion of its outstanding awards for which the requisite service was not yet
rendered as of January 1, 2006. However, at January 1, 2006, all of the
Company’s outstanding options were fully vested and thus there will be no
compensation expense in 2006 related to the adoption of SFAS No. 123R on these
outstanding options. The Company will determine the fair value of and account
for awards that are granted, modified, or settled after January 1, 2006 in
accordance with SFAS No. 123R.
The
following table presents the impact of SFAS No. 123R on operating income, loss
before income tax expense, net loss, basic and diluted loss per share, and
cash
flows from operating and financing activities:
(In thousands, except per share data) |
As
Reported
|
|
|||||||||||
Including
|
Excluding
|
||||||||||||
SFAS
No. 123R
|
SFAS
No. 123R
|
||||||||||||
Three Months Ended March 31, 2006 |
|
Adoption
|
Adoption
|
Impact
|
|||||||||
Operating
income
|
$
|
212
|
$
|
222
|
$
|
(10
|
)
|
||||||
Loss
before income tax expense
|
(1,322
|
)
|
(1,312
|
)
|
(10
|
)
|
|||||||
Net
loss
|
(1,322
|
)
|
(1,312
|
)
|
(10
|
)
|
|||||||
Basic
loss per common share
|
(0.15
|
)
|
(0.15
|
)
|
-
|
||||||||
Diluted
loss per common share
|
(0.15
|
)
|
(0.15
|
)
|
-
|
||||||||
Net
cash used in operating activities
|
(1,783
|
)
|
(1,783
|
)
|
-
|
||||||||
Net
cash provided by financing activities
|
629
|
629
|
-
|
||||||||||
Long
term incentive plan
During
1995, the Company established the 1995 Long-Term Incentive Stock Option Plan
(the “Plan”), which includes all officers, key employees and non-employee
members of the Company’s Board of Directors. All options to purchase shares of
the Company’s common stock under the Plan expire seven years from the date of
grant and generally become exercisable in three installments with 40% vesting
on
the first anniversary of the grant date and 30% vesting on each of the second
and third anniversaries of the grant date, subject to acceleration under certain
circumstances. As of March 31, 2006, the Company had 46,566 shares of common
stock reserved for future grants under the Plan.
12
Under
SFAS No. 123R, the Company recognizes compensation expense on a straight-line
basis over the requisite service period for stock-based compensation awards
with
both graded and cliff vesting terms. The Company applies a forfeiture estimate
to compensation expense recognized for awards that are expected to vest during
the requisite service period, and revises that estimate if subsequent
information indicates that the actual forfeitures will differ from the estimate.
The Company recognizes the cumulative effect of a change in the number of awards
expected to vest in compensation expense in the period of change. The Company
does not capitalize any portion of its stock-based compensation.
During
the three months ended March 31, 2006, the Company recognized $10,000 of pre-tax
stock-based compensation expense under the fair value method in accordance
with
SFAS No. 123R.
Summarized
information for the Company’s non-qualified stock options is as
follows:
Weighted
|
|||||||||||||
Weighted
|
Average
|
Aggregate
|
|||||||||||
|
Average
|
Remaining
|
Intrinsic
|
||||||||||
Shares
|
Exercise
Price
|
Years
|
Value
|
||||||||||
Outstanding
as of December 31, 2005
|
1,917,678
|
$
|
3.13
|
||||||||||
Granted
|
615,000
|
1.61
|
|||||||||||
Exercised
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||||
Cancelled/expired
|
(293,044
|
)
|
3.29
|
||||||||||
Outstanding
as of March 31, 2006
|
2,239,634
|
2.69
|
3.95
|
$
|
67,650
|
||||||||
Exercisable
at March 31, 2006
|
1,624,634
|
3.09
|
2.82
|
|
-
|
||||||||
Nonvested
shares at March 31, 2006
|
615,000 | 1.61 | 6.96 | 67,650 | |||||||||
A
summary
of the status of the Company’s nonvested shares as of March 31, 2006 and changes
during the three months ended March 31, 2006 is presented
below:
|
Weighted
|
||||||
|
Average
|
||||||
|
Number
|
Grant-Date
|
|||||
|
of
Shares
|
Fair
Value
|
|||||
Nonvested
at January 1, 2006
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
||||
Granted
|
615,000
|
1.03
|
|||||
Vested
|
-
|
-
|
|||||
Forfeited
|
-
|
-
|
|||||
Nonvested
at December 31, 2006
|
615,000
|
1.03
|
13
The
fair
value of the options granted in the first quarter 2006 was estimated on the
date
of grant using a Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following
weighted-average assumptions:
Three
months ended
|
|||
March
31,
|
|||
2006
|
|||
Risk-
free interest rates
|
4.73%
|
||
Dividend
yield
|
0%
|
||
Expected
life
|
5.0
|
||
Volatility
|
73.97%
|
||
14
As
of
March 31, 2006, the Company had $449,000 of unrecognized compensation related
to
the unvested portion of outstanding stock options which is expected to be
recognized through March 2009.
Pro-Forma
Information
The
following table presents the pro-forma effect on net income and earnings per
share for all outstanding stock-based compensation awards for the three months
ended March 31, 2005 in which the fair value provisions of SFAS No. 123R were
not in effect:
(in
thousands, except per share data)
|
Three
months ended
|
|||
March
31, 2005
|
||||
Net
loss, as reported
|
$
|
(1,042
|
)
|
|
Add
stock-based employee compensation expense
|
||||
included
in reported net loss
|
-
|
|||
Deduct
total stock-based employee compensation
|
||||
expense
determined under fair-value-method
|
||||
for
all awards
|
(672
|
)
|
||
Pro
forma net loss
|
$
|
(1,714
|
)
|
|
Net
loss per share, as reported:
|
||||
Basic
|
$
|
(0.12
|
)
|
|
Diluted
|
$
|
(0.12
|
)
|
|
Net
loss per share, proforma:
|
||||
Basic
|
$
|
(0.19
|
)
|
|
Diluted
|
$
|
(0.19
|
)
|
The
fair
value of each option was estimated on the date of grant using a Black-Scholes
option-pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions:
15
|
Three
months ended
|
||||
|
March
31,
|
||||
2005
|
|||||
Risk-
free interest rates
|
4.04
|
%
|
|||
Dividend
yield
|
0
|
%
|
|||
Expected
life
|
4.43
|
||||
Volatility
|
74.57
|
%
|
|||
Options
with an average exercise price of $1.85 covering a total of 600,000 shares
of
common stock were granted to 47 employees in the first quarter 2005, all of
which immediately vested.
5.
|
Long-term
Debt
|
The
Company’s long-term debt consists of the following:
(in
thousands)
|
March
31,
|
December
31,
|
|||||
2006
|
2005
|
||||||
Line
of credit with bank
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
1,182
|
|||
Line
of credit with Laurus Master Fund, Ltd.
|
403
|
-
|
|||||
Senior
convertible secured subordinated note payable
|
-
|
2,000
|
|||||
403
|
3,182
|
||||||
Less
warrant related discount, net of accretion
|
-
|
(318
|
)
|
||||
Less
convertible option discount, net of accretion
|
-
|
(813
|
)
|
||||
403
|
2,051
|
||||||
Less
current portion
|
-
|
(1,182
|
)
|
||||
Long-term
debt, less current portion
|
$
|
403
|
$
|
869
|
Line
of Credit
The
Company had a line of credit with a bank through General Physics Corporation,
a
wholly owned subsidiary of GP Strategies. Under the terms of the agreement,
$1.5
million of General Physics’ available credit facility was carved out for use by
GSE. The line was collateralized by substantially all of the Company’s assets
and provided for borrowings up to 80% of eligible accounts receivable and 80%
of
eligible unbilled receivables. GP Strategies guaranteed GSE’s borrowings under
the credit facility, which continued in place after the spin-off from GP
Strategies. The interest rate on the line of credit was based upon the Daily
LIBOR Market Index Rate plus 3%, with interest only payments due monthly. A
portion of the proceeds from the Company’s sale of Series A Cumulative
Convertible Preferred Stock on February 28, 2006 (see Note 6) was used to pay
down the outstanding balance of the line of credit, $1.2 million. The credit
facility was scheduled to expire on August 13, 2006.
On
March
7, 2006, the Company entered into a new loan and security agreement with
Laurus
Master Fund, Ltd. and terminated its existing $1.5 million bank line of credit.
The new agreement established a $5.0 million line of credit for the Company.
The
line is collateralized by substantially all of the Company’s assets and provides
for borrowings up to 90% of eligible accounts receivable, and 40% of eligible
unbilled receivables (up to a maximum of $1.0 million). The interest rate
on
this line of credit is based on the prime rate plus 200-basis points (9.75%
as
of March 31, 2005), with interest only payments due monthly. The credit facility
does not require the Company to comply with any financial ratios.
16
At
March 31, 2006, the Company’s available borrowing base was $2.7 million of which
$403,000 had been utilized. The credit facility expires on March 6, 2008.
The
Company issued to Laurus Master Fund, Ltd. a warrant to purchase up to 367,647
shares of GSE common stock at an exercise price of $.01 per share. At the
date
of issuance, the fair value of the Laurus warrant, which was established
using
the Black-Scholes Model, was $603,000 and was recorded as paid-in capital
with
the offset recorded as deferred financing charges. Deferred financing charges
are classified as an other asset and are amortized over the term of the credit
facility through a charge to interest expense.
Senior
Convertible Secured Subordinated Note Payable
On
May
26, 2005, GSE issued and sold to Dolphin Direct Equity Partners, LP (“Dolphin”)
a Senior Subordinated Secured Convertible Note in the aggregate principal amount
of $2,000,000 which was to mature on March 31, 2009 (the “Dolphin Note”), and a
seven-year warrant to purchase 380,952 shares of GSE common stock at an exercise
price of $2.22 per share (the “GSE Warrant”). The Dolphin Note was convertible
into 1,038,961 shares of GSE common stock at an exercise price of $1.925 per
share and accrued interest at 8% payable quarterly. Both the Convertible Note
and the Warrant were subject to ant-dilution provisions. The aggregate purchase
price for the Dolphin Note and GSE Warrant was $2,000,000. At the date of
issuance, the fair value of the GSE Warrant and Conversion Option, which was
established using the Black-Scholes Model, was $375,000 and $959,000,
respectively, both of which were recorded as noncurrent liabilities, with the
offset recorded as original issue discount (OID). OID was accreted over the
term
of the Dolphin Note and charged to interest expense, and the unamortized balance
was netted against long-term debt in the accompanying consolidated balance
sheets. The GSE Warrant and Conversion Option liabilities were marked to market
through earnings on a quarterly basis in accordance with EITF No. 00-19,
Accounting
for Derivative Financial Instruments Indexed to, and Potentially Settled in
a
Company’s Common Stock.
On
February 28, 2006, the Company and Dolphin entered into a Cancellation
and
Warrant Exchange Agreement (the “Cancellation Agreement”) under which Dolphin
agreed to cancel its Senior Subordinated Secured Convertible Promissory
Note and
cancel its outstanding warrant to purchase 380,952 shares of GSE common
stock at
an exercise price of $2.22 per share. In exchange for Dolphin’s agreement to
enter into the Cancellation Agreement and for the participation of Dolphin
Offshore Partners, LP in the Preferred Stock transaction discussed in Note
6
below, the Company repaid the Dolphin Note and agreed to issue a new warrant
to
purchase 900,000 shares of GSE common stock at an exercise price of $0.67
per
share (the “Dolphin Warrant”). Dolphin must exercise the new warrant promptly
after the Company certifies to Dolphin on or after May 30, 2006 (the “Mandatory
Exercise Date”) that, among other things, the current stock price shall not be
less than $1.25 on the Mandatory Exercise Date and that the average of
the
current stock prices for each trading day of the 30 calendar day period
up to
and including the Mandatory Exercise Date is not less than $1.25. At the
date of
issuance, the fair value of the Dolphin Warrant was $868,000, as established
using the Black-Scholes Model, and was recorded in paid-in capital with
the
offset recorded as loss on extinguishment of debt.
In
conjunction with the early payoff of the Dolphin Note and the cancellation
of
the 380,952 warrants, the Company wrote off the remaining unamortized Original
Issue Discount of $1.1 million, wrote off the remaining unamortized deferred
financing charges of $185,000, recognized a credit of $698,000 from the
write-off of the liabilities related to the Dolphin Note conversion feature
and
the related warrants and took an $868,000 charge for the value of the 900,000
new warrants issued to Dolphin. The total loss on extinguishment of the
Dolphin
Note and the cancellation of the related warrants totaled $1.4 million.
6.
|
Series
A Convertible Preferred
Stock
|
On
February 28, 2006, the Company raised $3.9 million, net of associated fees
of
$395,000, through the sale of 42,500 shares of Series A Cumulative Convertible
Preferred Stock and Warrants by means of a private placement to “accredited
investors”, as that term is used in rules and regulations of the Securities and
Exchange Commission.
17
The
Convertible Preferred Stock is convertible at any time into a total of 2,401,130
shares of GSE common stock at a conversion price of $1.77 per share. The
conversion price was equal to 110% of the closing price of the Company’s Common
Stock on February 28, 2006, the date the sale of the Convertible Preferred
Stock
was completed. Each investor received a five-year warrant to purchase GSE
common
stock equal to 20% of the shares they would receive from the conversion of
the
Convertible Preferred Stock, at an exercise price of $1.77. In total, the
Company issued warrants to purchase a total of 480,226 shares of GSE common
stock. At
the
date of issuance, the fair value of the warrants was $342,000 and the fair
value
of the preferred stock was $3.9 million. The fair value of the warrants and
the
preferred stock was determined through the use of the relative fair value
method, in which the $4.25 million gross proceeds was allocated based upon
the
fair values of the warrants, as determined by using the Black-Scholes Model,
and
the preferred stock, as determined by an independent appraisal. The
Convertible Preferred Stock holders are entitled to an 8% cumulative dividend,
payable on a semiannual basis every June 30 and December 30. If the Company
does
not make two consecutive dividend payments on the dates such payments are
due,
there will be an additional 30% warrant coverage of five-year warrants at
a
conversion price of $1.77 per share. At any time after March 1, 2007, the
Company has the right to convert the Preferred Stock into shares of GSE common
stock when the average of the current stock price during the twenty trading
days
immediately prior to the date of such conversion exceeds 200% of the Series
A
Conversion Price. The holders of the Convertible Preferred Stock are entitled
to
vote on all matters submitted to the stockholders for a vote, together with
the
holders of the voting common stock, all voting together as a single class.
The
holders of the Convertible Preferred Stock are entitled to the number of
votes
equal to the number of GSE common stock that they would receive upon conversion
of their Convertible Preferred Stock.
The
Company paid the placement agent for the Convertible Preferred Stock and
Warrants 6% of the gross proceeds received by the Company from the offering
($255,000) plus five-year warrants to purchase 150,000 shares of the Company’s
common stock at an exercise price of $1.77 per share. In addition to the
placement agent fee, the Company paid $140,000 of other transaction fees
related
to the offering. At the date of issuance, the fair value of the placement
agent
warrants was $128,000, as established using the Black-Scholes Model, and
was
recorded in paid-in capital, with the offset recognized as a reduction
of the
preferred stock proceeds.
On
October 23, 2003, ManTech International, Inc. converted all of its preferred
stock to common stock in conjunction with the sale of its ownership in
GSE to GP
Strategies. The Company had accrued dividends payable to ManTech of $316,000
and
$366,000 as of March 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005, respectively. The
unpaid
dividends accrue interest at 6% per annum. At March 31, 2005 and December
31,
2005, the Company had an accrual for interest payable of $65,000 and $60,000,
respectively.
7.
|
Letters
of Credit
and Performance Bonds
|
As
of
March 31, 2006, the Company was contingently liable for approximately $56,000
under one letter of credit used as a payment bond on a contract, which was
secured by a cash deposit classified as restricted cash and included in other
assets in the consolidated balance sheet. The Company also was contingently
liable for $10,000 under a letter of credit used as a bid bond on an outstanding
proposal, which was cash collateralized. In addition, the Company was
contingently liable at March 31, 2006 for approximately $30,000 under a
performance bond on one contract, which was secured by a bank guarantee of
the
Company’s foreign subsidiary.
8.
|
Income
Taxes
|
The
Company’s effective tax rate was 0% and 4.0% for the three months ended March
31, 2006 and March 31, 2005, respectively. The Company has a $10.4 million
valuation allowance for all of the deferred tax assets at March 31, 2006.
The
amount of loss carryforward which can be used by the Company may be
significantly limited and may expire unutilized.
18
9.
|
Administrative
Charges from GP
Strategies.
|
The
Company has extended its Management Services Agreement with GP Strategies
Corporation through December 31, 2006. Under the agreement, GP Strategies
provides corporate support services to GSE, including accounting, finance,
human
resources, legal, network support and tax. In addition, GSE uses the financial
system of General Physics, a subsidiary of GP Strategies. The Company was
charged $171,000 by GP Strategies in both the first quarter 2006 and 2005.
10.
|
Commitments
and Contingencies
|
In
October 2005, the Company signed an “Assignment of Lease and Amendment to Lease”
that assigns and transfers to another tenant (the “assignee”) the Company’s
rights, title and interest in its Columbia, Maryland facility lease. The
assignee’s obligation to pay rent under the Lease began on February 1, 2006. The
Company remains fully liable for the payment of all rent and for the performance
of all obligations under the lease through the scheduled expiration of the
lease, May 31, 2008, should the assignee default on their obligations. At
March
31, 2006, the remaining rental payments under the lease totaled $1.6 million.
The Company relocated its Maryland operations from its Columbia facility
to its
Baltimore facility in October 2005.
In
January 2006, the Company was awarded a $15.1 million contract from the Emirates
Simulation Academy, LLC (“ESA”) in the United Arab Emirates to supply five
simulators and an integrated training program. Under the terms of the contract,
the Company is required to provide a $2.1 million performance bond to ESA
that
will remain outstanding until the end of the warranty period, approximately
29
months. The bond is expected to be issued by GSE in May 2006.
19
Item
2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Results of Operations and Financial
Condition
GSE
Systems, Inc. (“GSE Systems”, “GSE” or the “Company”) is a world leader in
real-time high fidelity simulation technology and model development. The
Company
provides simulation solutions and services to the power generation industry,
the
process industries, and the US Government. In addition, the Company provides
plant monitoring and signal analysis monitoring and optimization software
primarily to the power industry, and develops specialized software applications
for emerging technologies. The Company has only one reportable segment.
On
June
21, 2005, the Board of Directors of GP Strategies Corporation (“GP Strategies”)
approved plans to spin-off its 57% interest in GSE through a special dividend
to
the GP Strategies’ stockholders. On September 30, 2005, the GP Strategies’
stockholders received 0.283075 share of GSE common stock for each share of
GP
Strategies common stock or Class B stock held on the record date of September
19, 2005. Following the spin-off, GP Strategies ceased to have any ownership
interest in GSE. GP Strategies continues to provide corporate support services
to GSE, including accounting, finance, human resources, legal, network support
and tax pursuant to a Management Services Agreement which expires on December
31, 2006.
In
order
to ensure that the Company has sufficient working capital in 2006, the Company
completed several financing transactions in early 2006. On February 28, 2006,
the Company and Dolphin entered into a Cancellation and Warrant Exchange
Agreement (the “Cancellation Agreement “) under which Dolphin agreed to cancel
its Senior Subordinated Secured Convertible Promissory Note and cancel its
outstanding warrant to purchase 380,952 shares of GSE common stock at an
exercise price of $2.22 per share. In exchange for Dolphin’s agreement to enter
into the Cancellation Agreement and for the participation of Dolphin Offshore
Partners, LP in the Preferred Stock transaction discussed below, the Company
repaid the Dolphin Note and agreed to issue a new warrant to purchase
900,000 shares of GSE common stock at an exercise price of $0.67 per share
(the
“Dolphin Warrant”). Dolphin must exercise the new warrant promptly after the
Company certifies to Dolphin on or after May 30, 2006 (the “Mandatory Exercise
Date”) that, among other things, the current stock price shall not be less than
$1.25 on the Mandatory Exercise Date and that the average of the current
stock
prices for each trading day of the 30 calendar day period up to and including
the Mandatory Exercise Date is not less than $1.25. At the date of issuance,
the
fair value of the Dolphin Warrant was $868,000, as established using the
Black-Scholes Model, and was recorded in paid-in capital with the offset
recorded as loss on extinguishment of debt.
In
conjunction with the early payoff of the Dolphin Note and the cancellation
of
the 380,952 warrants, the Company wrote off the remaining unamortized Original
Issue Discount of $1.1 million, wrote off the remaining unamortized deferred
financing charges of $185,000; recognized a credit of $698,000 from the
write-off of the liabilities related to the Dolphin Note conversion feature
and
the related warrants and took an $868,000 charge for the value of the 900,000
new warrants issued to Dolphin. The total loss on extinguishment of the Dolphin
Note and the cancellation of the related warrants totaled $1.4 million.
On
February 28, 2006, the Company raised $3.9 million, net of associated fees
of
$395,000, through the sale of 42,500 shares of Series A Cumulative Convertible
Preferred Stock and Warrants by means of a private placement to “accredited
investors”, as that term is used in rules and regulations of the Securities and
Exchange Commission. The Convertible Preferred Stock is convertible at
any time
into a total of 2,401,130 shares of GSE common stock at a conversion price
of
$1.77 per share. The conversion price was equal to 110% of the closing
price of
the Company’s Common Stock on February 28, 2006, the date the sale of the
Convertible Preferred Stock was completed. Each investor received a five-year
warrant to purchase GSE common stock equal to 20% of the shares they would
received from the conversion of the Convertible Preferred Stock, at an
exercise
price of $1.77. In aggregate, the Company issued warrants to purchase a
total of
480,226 shares of GSE common stock. At
the
date of issuance, the fair value of the warrants was $342,000 and the fair
value
of the preferred stock was $3.9 million. The fair value of the warrants
and the
preferred stock was determined through the use of the relative fair value
method, in which the $4.25 million gross proceeds was allocated based upon
the
fair values of the warrants, as determined by using the Black-Scholes Model,
and
the preferred stock, as determined by an independent appraisal. The
Convertible Preferred Stock holders are entitled to an 8% cumulative dividend,
payable on a semiannual basis every June 30 and December 30.
20
If
the
Company does not make two consecutive dividend payments on the dates such
payments are due, there will be an additional 30% warrant coverage of five-year
warrants at a conversion price of $1.77 per share. At any time after March
1,
2007, the Company has the right to convert the Preferred Stock into shares
of
GSE common stock when the average of the current stock price during the
twenty
trading days immediately prior to the date of such conversion exceeds 200%
of
the Series A Conversion Price. The holders of the Convertible Preferred
Stock
are entitled to vote on all matters submitted to the stockholders for a
vote,
together with the holders of the voting common stock, all voting together
as a
single class. The holders of the Convertible Preferred Stock are entitled
to the
number of votes equal to the number of GSE common stock that they would
receive
upon conversion of their Convertible Preferred Stock.
The
Company paid the placement agent for the Convertible Preferred Stock and
Warrants 6% of the gross proceeds received by the Company from the offering
($255,000) plus five-year warrants to purchase 150,000 shares of the Company’s
common stock at an exercise price of $1.77 per share. In addition to the
placement agent fee, the Company paid $140,000 of other transaction fees
related
to the offering. At the date of issuance, the fair value of the placement
agent
warrants was $128,000, as established using the Black-Scholes Model, and
was
recorded in paid-in capital, with the offset recognized as a reduction
of the
preferred stock proceeds.
The
proceeds were used to payoff the Dolphin Note and the Company’s line of credit
balance and for other working capital purposes.
On
March
7, 2006, the Company entered into a new loan and security agreement with
Laurus
Master Fund, Ltd. and terminated its existing $1.5 million bank line of
credit.
The new agreement established a $5.0 million line of credit for the Company.
The
line is collateralized by substantially all of the Company’s assets and provides
for borrowings up to 90% of eligible accounts receivable, and 40% of eligible
unbilled receivables (up to a maximum of $1.0 million). The interest rate
on
this line of credit is based on the prime rate plus 200-basis points, with
interest only payments due monthly. There are no financial covenant requirements
under the new agreement. At March 31, 2006, the Company’s available borrowing
base was $2.7 million of which $403,000 had been utilized. The credit facility
expires on March 6, 2008. The Company issued to Laurus Master Fund, Ltd.
a
warrant to purchase up to 367,647 shares of GSE common stock at an exercise
price of $.01 per share. At the date of issuance, the fair value of the
Laurus
warrant, which was established using the Black-Scholes Model, was $603,000
and
was recorded as paid-in capital with the offset recorded as deferred financing
charges. Deferred financing charges are classified as an other asset and
are
amortized over the term of the credit facility through a charge to interest
expense.
After
the
completion of the financing transactions discussed above, the Company believes
that it has sufficient liquidity and working capital for its operations
in 2006.
However, if the Company is unable to operate profitably and generate sufficient
cash from operations, the availability under its new line of credit may
not be
sufficient and the Company may be required to look for additional capital
to
fund its operations. There can be no assurance that the Company would be
successful in raising such additional funds.
In
October 2005, the Company signed an “Assignment of Lease and Amendment to Lease”
that assigns and transfers to another tenant (the “assignee”) the Company’s
rights, title and interest in its Columbia, Maryland facility lease. The
assignee’s obligation to pay rent under the Lease began on February 1, 2006. The
Company remains fully liable for the payment of all rent and for the performance
of all obligations under the lease through the scheduled expiration of
the
lease, May 31, 2008, should the assignee default on their obligations.
At March
31, 2006, the remaining rental payments under the lease totaled $1.6 million.
Cautionary
Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
This
report contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A
of
the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. The Private Securities Litigation Reform
Act
of 1995 provides a “safe harbor” for forward looking statements.
21
Forward-looking
statements are not statements of historical facts, but rather reflect our
current expectations concerning future events and results. We use words such
as
“expects”, “intends”, “believes”, “may”, “will” and “anticipates” to indicate
forward-looking statements. Because these forward-looking statements involve
risks and uncertainties, there are important factors that could cause actual
results to differ materially from those expressed or implied by these
forward-looking statements, including, but not limited to, those factors set
forth under Item 1A - Risk Factors of the Company’s 2005 Annual Report on Form
10-K and those other risks and uncertainties detailed in the Company’s periodic
reports and registration statements filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission. We caution that these risk factors may not be exhaustive. We operate
in a continually changing business environment, and new risk factors emerge
from
time to time. We cannot predict these new risk factors, nor can we assess the
effect, if any, of the new risk factors on our business or the extent to which
any factor or combination of factors may cause actual results to differ from
those expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements.
If
any
one or more of these expectations and assumptions proves incorrect, actual
results will likely differ materially from those contemplated by the
forward-looking statements. Even if all of the foregoing assumptions and
expectations prove correct, actual results may still differ materially from
those expressed in the forward-looking statements as a result of factors we
may
not anticipate or that may be beyond our control. While we cannot assess the
future impact that any of these differences could have on our business,
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows or the market price
of
shares of our common stock, the differences could be significant. We do not
undertake to update any forward-looking statements made by us, whether as a
result of new information, future events or otherwise. You are cautioned not
to
unduly rely on such forward-looking statements when evaluating the information
presented in this report.
General
Business Environment
The
Company believes it is positioned to take advantage of emerging trends in
the
power industry including a global nuclear power renaissance driven by the
high
cost of oil coupled with environmental concerns caused by fossil fuels. In
the
U.S. alone, the operating licenses for 32 nuclear power plants will expire
over
the next several years. Many of these plants are planning significant upgrades
to the physical equipment and control room technology in conjunction with
the
license extensions. Both will result in the need to modify or replace the
existing plant control room simulators. The Company, having what it believes
is
the largest installed base of existing simulators, over 65%, is well positioned
to capture a large portion of this business, although no assurance can be
given
that it will be successful in doing so.
The
Company continues its focus on the fossil power segment of the power industry.
In the first quarter 2006, the Company logged fossil power orders of
approximately $1.0 million. The Company expects continued growth in this
market
segment and is focusing on second time simulation buyers that now demand
the
more sophisticated and realistic simulation models offered by the
Company.
While
GSE
simulators are primarily utilized for power plant operator training, the
uses
are expanding to include engineering analysis, plant modification studies,
and
operation efficiency improvements for both nuclear and fossil utilities.
During
plant construction, simulators are used to test control strategies and ensure
on-time start-up. After commissioning, the same tools can be used to increase
plant availability and optimize plant performance for the life of the facility.
In partnership with an industry leading optimization company, GSE will be
participating in DOE grant programs to utilize simulation and optimization
for
DOE’s clean coal power initiative.
Over
the
course of 2006, the Company will continue to develop its concept of integrating
simulation with broader training programs and educational initiatives giving
customers a turnkey alternative to operator and maintenance training. The
Company believes that this offering is unique. In the fourth quarter 2005,
the
Company announced the formation of the Emirates Simulation Academy, LLC (ESA),
a
United Arab Emirates company, to build and operate simulation training academies
in the Arab Gulf Region.
22
GSE
is a
10% owner of ESA. These simulation training centers will be designed to train
and certify indigenous workers for deployment to a nation’s critical
infrastructure facilities including power plants, oil refineries, petro-chemical
plants, desalination units and other industrial facilities. In January 2006,
the
Company announced the award of a contract valued at over $15 million from
ESA to
supply five simulators and an integrated training program.
In
March
2006, the Company announced that it had agreed to develop a Simulation Training
and Diagnostic Center in concert with the University of Strathclyde located
in
Glasgow, Scotland. Upon finalization of project financing, GSE and Strathclyde
will collaborate to develop a simulation training center in Glasgow where
indigenous UK and international workers can be educated and trained to operate
and maintain power plants, oil refineries, petrochemical plants and other
industrial facilities and to develop a plant and equipment diagnostic center
where actual plant process points are monitored and analyzed.
Results
of Operations
The
following table sets forth the results of operations for the periods presented
expressed in thousands of dollars and as a percentage of revenues:
(in
thousands)
|
|
Three
months ended March, 31
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
2006
|
%
|
2005
|
%
|
||||||||||||||||||
Contract
revenue
|
$
|
5,584
|
100.0
|
%
|
$
|
6,293
|
100.0
|
%
|
||||||||||||||
Cost
of revenue
|
4,133
|
74.0
|
%
|
5,238
|
83.2
|
%
|
||||||||||||||||
Gross
profit
|
1,451
|
26.0
|
%
|
1,055
|
16.8
|
%
|
||||||||||||||||
Operating
expenses:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Selling,
general and administrative
|
1,021
|
18.3
|
%
|
1,830
|
29.2
|
%
|
||||||||||||||||
Administrative
charges from GP Strategies
|
171
|
3.1
|
%
|
171
|
2.7
|
%
|
||||||||||||||||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
47
|
0.8
|
%
|
77
|
1.2
|
%
|
||||||||||||||||
Total
operating expenses
|
1,239
|
22.2
|
%
|
2,078
|
33.1
|
%
|
||||||||||||||||
Operating
income (loss)
|
212
|
3.8
|
%
|
(1,023
|
)
|
(16.3
|
)%
|
|||||||||||||||
Interest
expense, net
|
(157
|
)
|
(2.8
|
)%
|
(17
|
)
|
(0.2
|
)%
|
||||||||||||||
Loss
on extinquishment of debt
|
(1,428
|
)
|
(25.6
|
)%
|
-
|
0.0
|
%
|
|||||||||||||||
Other
income (expense), net
|
51
|
0.9
|
%
|
(51
|
)
|
(0.8
|
)%
|
|||||||||||||||
Loss
before income taxes
|
(1,322
|
)
|
(23.7
|
)%
|
(1,091
|
)
|
(17.3
|
)%
|
||||||||||||||
Provision
(benefit) for income taxes
|
-
|
0.0
|
%
|
(49
|
)
|
(0.7
|
)%
|
|||||||||||||||
Net
loss
|
$
|
(1,322
|
)
|
(23.7
|
)%
|
$
|
(1,042
|
)
|
(16.6
|
)%
|
||||||||||||
Critical
Accounting Policies and Estimates
In
preparing the Company’s financial statements, management makes several estimates
and assumptions that affect the Company’s reported amounts of assets,
liabilities, revenue and expenses. Those accounting estimates that have the
most
significant impact on the Company’s operating results and place the most
significant demands on management's judgment are discussed below. For all of
these policies, management cautions that future events rarely develop exactly
as
forecast, and the best estimates may require adjustment.
Revenue
Recognition on Long-Term Contracts.
The
majority of the Company’s revenue is derived through the sale of uniquely
designed systems containing hardware, software and other materials under
fixed-price contracts. In accordance with Statement of Position 81-1,
Accounting
for Performance of Construction-Type and Certain Production-Type
Contracts,
the
revenue under these fixed-price contracts is accounted for on the
percentage-of-completion method.
23
This
methodology recognizes revenue and earnings as work progresses on the contract
and is based on an estimate of the revenue and earnings earned to date, less
amounts recognized in prior periods. The Company bases its estimate of the
degree of completion of the contract by reviewing the relationship of costs
incurred to date to the expected total costs that will be incurred on the
project. Estimated contract earnings are reviewed and revised periodically
as
the work progresses, and the cumulative effect of any change in estimate is
recognized in the period in which the change is identified. Estimated losses
are
charged against earnings in the period such losses are identified. The Company
recognizes revenue arising from contract claims either as income or as an offset
against a potential loss only when the amount of the claim can be estimated
reliably and realization is probable and there is a legal basis of the claim.
Uncertainties
inherent in the performance of contracts include labor availability and
productivity, material costs, change order scope and pricing, software
modification and customer acceptance issues. The reliability of these cost
estimates is critical to the Company’s revenue recognition as a significant
change in the estimates can cause the Company’s revenue and related margins to
change significantly from the amounts estimated in the early stages of the
project.
As
the
Company recognizes revenue under the percentage-of-completion method, it
provides an accrual for estimated future warranty costs based on historical
and
projected claims experience. The Company’s long-term contracts generally provide
for a one-year warranty on parts, labor and any bug fixes as it relates to
software embedded in the systems.
The
Company’s system design contracts do not provide for “post customer support
service” (PCS) in terms of software upgrades, software enhancements or telephone
support. In order to obtain PCS, the customers must purchase a separate
contract. Such PCS arrangements are generally for a one-year period renewable
annually and include customer support, unspecified software upgrades, and
maintenance releases. The Company recognizes revenue from these contracts
ratably over the life of the agreements in accordance with Statement of Position
97-2, Software
Revenue Recognition.
Revenue
from the sale of software licenses which do not require significant
modifications or customization for the Company’s modeling tools are recognized
when the license agreement is signed, the license fee is fixed and determinable,
delivery has occurred, and collection is considered probable.
Revenues
from certain consulting or training contracts are recognized on a
time-and-material basis. For time-and-material type contracts, revenue is
recognized based on hours incurred at a contracted labor rate plus
expenses.
Capitalization
of Computer Software Development Costs.
In
accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 86,
Accounting
for the Costs of Computer Software to Be Sold, Leased, or Otherwise
Marketed,
the
Company capitalizes computer software development costs incurred after
technological feasibility has been established, but prior to the release of
the
software product for sale to customers. Once the product is available to be
sold, the Company amortizes the costs, on a straight line method, over the
estimated useful life of the product, which normally ranges from three to five
years. As of March 31, 2006, the Company has net capitalized software
development costs of $862,000. On an annual basis, and more frequently as
conditions indicate, the Company assesses the recovery of the unamortized
software computer costs by estimating the net undiscounted cash flows expected
to be generated by the sale of the product. If the undiscounted cash flows
are
not sufficient to recover the unamortized software costs the Company will
write-down the investment to its estimated fair value based on future discounted
cash flows. The excess of any unamortized computer software costs over the
related net realizable value is written down and charged to operations.
24
Significant
changes in the sales projections could result in an impairment with respect
to
the capitalized software that is reported on the Company’s consolidated balance
sheet.
Deferred
Income Tax Valuation Allowance.
Deferred income taxes arise from temporary differences between the tax bases
of
assets and liabilities and their reported amounts in the financial statements.
As required by SFAS No. 109 Accounting
for Income Taxes,
management makes a regular assessment of the realizability of the Company’s
deferred tax assets. In making this assessment, management considers whether
it
is more likely than not that some or all of the deferred tax assets will not
be
realized. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon
the
generation of future taxable income during the periods in which those temporary
differences become deductible. Management considers the scheduled reversal
of
deferred tax liabilities and projected future taxable income of the Company
in
making this assessment. A valuation allowance is recorded to reduce the total
deferred income tax asset to its realizable value. As of March 31, 2006, the
Company’s largest deferred tax asset related to a U.S. net operating loss
carryforward of $20.4 million which expires in various amounts over the next
twenty years. The amount of loss carryforward which can be used by the Company
may be significantly limited. The recovery of the net deferred tax asset could
not be substantiated by currently available objective evidence. Accordingly,
the
Company has established a $10.4 million valuation allowance for its deferred
tax
assets at March 31, 2006.
Results
of Operations - Three Months ended March 31, 2006 versus Three Months ended
March 31, 2005.
Contract
Revenue.
Total
contract revenue for the quarter ended March 31, 2006 totaled $5.6 million,
which was 11.3% lower than the $6.3 million total revenue for the quarter
ended
March 31, 2005. The decrease reflects a decline in orders and lower volume
in
2005. However, total orders logged in the first quarter 2006 totaled $23.0
million (including the $15.1 million contract received from ESA) as compared
to
$3.1 million in the first quarter 2005 and $15.3 million for the year ended
December 31, 2005. At March 31, 2006, the Company’s backlog was $29.7
million.
Gross
Profit.
Gross
profit totaled $1.5 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2006 versus $1.1
million for the same quarter in 2005. As a percentage of revenue, gross profit
increased from 16.8% for the three months ended March 31, 2005 to 26.0 %
for the
three months ended March 31, 2006. In the first quarter 2005, the Company
had
made certain adjustments to the estimated costs to complete several of its
long-term contracts which resulted in a net reduction of the contract-to-date
gross profit recognized on the contracts.
Selling,
General and Administrative Expenses.
Selling, general and administrative (“SG&A”) expenses totaled $1.0 million
in the quarter ended March 31, 2006, a 44.2% decrease from the $1.8 million
for
the same period in 2005. Business development and marketing costs decreased
from
$939,000 in the first quarter 2005 to $431,000 in the first quarter 2006.
In
order to reduce operating expenses, the Company terminated several of its
business development personnel in mid-2005 and reassigned others to operating
positions. The Company’s corporate and G&A expenses totaled $479,000 in the
first quarter 2006, which was 35.0% lower than the $737,000 incurred in the
first quarter 2005. The reductions reflect lower facility costs in 2006,
plus
the reassignment of one executive from corporate to an operating position.
Gross
spending on software product development (“development”) totaled $139,000 in the
quarter ended March 31, 2006 as compared to $144,000 in the same period of
2005.
The Company anticipates that its total gross development spending in 2006
will
approximate $700,000.
The
Company capitalized $29,000 of development expenditures in the three months
ended March 31, 2005 as compared to $91,000 in the same period of 2005. The
Company’s development expenditures in 2006 were primarily related to the
development of new features for the Xflow modeling tool for modeling power
plant
buildings.
25
At
the
end of the first quarter 2005, the Company implemented a staff reduction;
SG&A expense reflects $100,000 of accrued severance. The Company does not
anticipate any severance charges in 2006.
Administrative
Charges from GP Strategies.
The
Company has extended its Management Services Agreement with GP Strategies
Corporation through December 31, 2006. Under the agreement, GP Strategies
provides corporate support services to GSE, including accounting, finance,
human
resources, legal, network support and tax. In addition, GSE uses the financial
system of General Physics, a subsidiary of GP Strategies. The Company was
charged $171,000 by GP Strategies in both the first quarter 2006 and 2005.
Under
the Management Services Agreement, the Company will be charged $171,000 per
quarter throughout the remainder of 2006.
Depreciation
and Amortization.
Depreciation expense totaled $47,000 and $77,000 during the quarters ended
March
31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. Due to the relocation of the Company’s Maryland
operations from Columbia, Maryland to Baltimore, Maryland, the Company
accelerated the depreciation of certain leasehold improvements in 2005 which
has
resulted in lower depreciation expense in 2006.
Operating
Income (Loss).
The
Company had operating income of $212,000 (3.8% of revenue) in the first
quarter 2006, as compared with an operating loss of $1.0 million (16.3% of
revenue) for the same period in 2005. The variances were due to the factors
outlined above.
Interest
Expense, Net. Net interest expense increased from $17,000 in the quarter
ended March 31, 2005 to $157,000 for the same quarter in 2006. The Company
incurred interest expense of $26,000 on the Dolphin Note in the first quarter
2006 and original issue discount accretion related to the Dolphin Note and
GSE
Warrant of $58,000.
Amortization
of deferred financing costs related to the Company’s lines of credit totaled
$44,000 in the first quarter 2006 versus only $6,000 in the first quarter 2005.
The
Company incurred interest expense of $19,000 and $6,000 on borrowings against
its credit facilities in the three months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005,
respectively.
Loss
on Extinguishment of Debt.
On February 28, 2006, the Company and Dolphin entered into a Cancellation
and
Warrant Exchange Agreement (the “Cancellation Agreement “) under which Dolphin
agreed to cancel its Senior Subordinated Secured Convertible Promissory Note
and
cancel its outstanding warrant to purchase 380,952 shares of GSE common stock
at
an exercise price of $2.22 per share. In exchange for Dolphin’s agreement to
enter into the Cancellation Agreement and for the participation of Dolphin
Offshore Partners, LP in the Preferred Stock transaction, the Company repaid
the
Dolphin Note and agreed to issue a new warrant to purchase 900,000 shares
of GSE
common stock at an exercise price of $0.67 per share.
In
conjunction with the early payoff of the Dolphin Note and the cancellation
of
the 380,952 warrants, the Company wrote off the remaining unamortized Original
Issue Discount of $1.1 million, wrote off the remaining unamortized deferred
financing charges of $185,000; recognized a credit of $698,000 from the
write-off of the liabilities related to the Dolphin Note conversion feature
and
the related warrants and took an $868,000 charge for the value of the 900,000
new warrants issued to Dolphin.
Other
Income (Expense), Net.
At
March 31, 2006, the Company had contracts for the sale of approximately 237
million Japanese Yen at fixed rates. The contracts expire on various dates
through May 2007. The Company has not designated the contracts as hedges and,
accordingly, has recorded the change in the estimated fair value of the
contracts during the first quarter 2006 of ($9,000) in other income (expense).
26
At
March
31, 2005, the Company had contracts for sale of approximately 381 million
Japanese Yen at fixed rates. The Company had not designated the contracts as
hedges and, accordingly, recorded the change in the estimated fair value of
the
contracts of $54,000 in other income (expense).
In
the
first quarter 2006, the Company incurred foreign currency transaction gains
of
$43,000 versus foreign currency transaction losses of $13,000 in the first
quarter 2005.
Provision
(Benefit) for Income Taxes.
The Company’s effective tax rate was 0% and 4.0% for the three months ended
March 31, 2006 and March 31, 2005, respectively. The Company has a $10.4
million
valuation allowance for all of the deferred tax assets at March 31, 2006.
The
amount of loss carryforward which can be used by the Company may be
significantly limited and may expire unutilized.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
As
of
March 31, 2006, the Company’s cash and cash equivalents totaled $104,000
compared to $1,321,000 at December 31, 2005.
Cash
used in operating activities.
Net
cash used in operating activities was $1.8 million for the three months ended
March 31, 2006. The loss on early extinguishment of debt of $1.4 million was
a
non-cash expense that had no impact on the Company’s operating cash flow.
Significant changes in the Company’s assets and liabilities in 2006
included:
¨
|
A
$2.3 million increase in contracts receivable. The increase mainly
reflects a $2.2 million invoice issued in January 2006 to the Emirates
Simulation Academy, LLC (ESA) for an advance payment on the UAE training
center project which is still outstanding.
|
¨
|
A
$1.0 million decrease in accounts payable, accrued compensation and
accrued expenses. The reduction mainly reflects the utilization of
a
portion of the funds received through the Company’s convertible preferred
stock transaction to pay down accounts payable.
|
¨
|
A
$1.7 million increase in billings in excess of revenues earned. This
increase is also due to the advance payment billing to ESA.
|
For
the
three months ended March 31, 2005, net cash used in operating activities was
$1.4 million, primarily due to the Company’s net loss. The only significant
change in the Company’s assets and liabilities in 2005 was a decrease in
billings in excess of revenues earned by $520,000.
Cash
used in investing activities. For
the
three months ended March 31, 2006, net cash used in investing activities was
$68,000 consisting of $29,000 of capitalized software development costs and
$39,000 of capital expenditures.
Net
cash
used in investing activities was $158,000 for the three months ended March
31,
2005, consisting of $91,000 of capitalized software development costs and
$67,000 of capital expenditures.
Cash
provided by financing activities.
The
Company generated $629,000 from financing activities in the three months ended
March 31, 2006. The Company generated net proceeds of $3.9 million from the
issuance of 42,500 shares of Series A Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock
which were used to pay off the $2.0 million Dolphin Note and the outstanding
borrowings under the Company’s bank line of credit. In conjunction with the
establishment of a new line of credit with Laurus Master Fund, Ltd. the Company
incurred cash financing costs of $448,000.
27
In
the
three months ended March 31, 2005, the Company generated $794,000 from financing
activities. The Company borrowed $700,000 from its bank line of credit and
generated $100,000 from the conversion of employee stock options. The Company
also paid down a note payable by $6,000 during the quarter.
Credit
Facilities
The
Company had a line of credit with a bank through General Physics Corporation,
a
wholly owned subsidiary of GP Strategies. Under the terms of the agreement,
$1.5
million of General Physics’ available credit facility was carved out for use by
GSE. The line was collateralized by substantially all of the Company’s assets
and provided for borrowings up to 80% of eligible accounts receivable and
80% of
eligible unbilled receivables. GP Strategies guaranteed GSE’s borrowings under
the credit facility, which continued in place after the spin-off from GP
Strategies. The interest rate on the line of credit was based upon the Daily
LIBOR Market Index Rate plus 3%, with interest only payments due monthly.
A
portion of the proceeds from the Company’s sale of Series A Cumulative
Convertible Preferred Stock on February 28, 2006 (see discussion below) was
used
to pay down the outstanding balance of the line of credit, $1.2 million.
The
credit facility was scheduled to expire on August 13, 2006.
On
March
7, 2006, the Company entered into a new loan and security agreement with
Laurus
Master Fund, Ltd. and terminated its existing $1.5 million bank line of
credit.
The new agreement established a $5.0 million line of credit for the Company.
The
line is collateralized by substantially all of the Company’s assets and provides
for borrowings up to 90% of eligible accounts receivable, and 40% of eligible
unbilled receivables (up to a maximum of $1.0 million). The interest rate
on
this line of credit is based on the prime rate plus 200-basis points (9.75%
as
of March 31, 2006), with interest only payments due monthly. There are
no
financial covenant requirements under the new agreement. At March 31, 2006,
the
Company’s available borrowing base was $2.7 million of which $403,000 had been
utilized. The credit facility expires on March 6, 2008. The Company issued
to
Laurus Master Fund, Ltd. a warrant to purchase up to 367,647 shares of
GSE
common stock at an exercise price of $.01 per share. At the date of issuance,
the fair value of the Laurus warrant, which was established using the
Black-Scholes Model, was $603,000 and was recorded as paid-in capital with
the
offset recorded as deferred financing charges. Deferred financing charges
are
classified as an other asset and are amortized over the term of the credit
facility through a charge to interest expense.
Senior
Convertible Secured Subordinated Note Payable
On
May
26, 2005, GSE issued and sold to Dolphin Direct Equity Partners, LP a Senior
Subordinated Secured Convertible Note in the aggregate principal amount of
$2,000,000, which matures March 31, 2009 (the “Dolphin Note”), and a seven-year
warrant to purchase 380,952 shares of GSE common stock at an exercise price
of
$2.22 per share (the “GSE Warrant”). The Dolphin Note was convertible into
1,038,961 shares of GSE common stock at a conversion price of $1.925 per
share
and accrued interest at 8% payable quarterly. The aggregate purchase price
for
the Dolphin Note and GSE Warrant was $2,000,000. At the date of issuance,
the
fair value of the GSE Warrant was $375,000 and the fair value of the Conversion
Option of the Dolphin Note was $959,000, both of which were recorded as
noncurrent liabilities, with the offset recorded as original issue discount
(OID). OID was accreted over the term of the Dolphin Note and charged to
interest expense, and the unamortized balance was netted against long-term
debt
in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. The GSE Warrant and Conversion
Option liabilities were marked to market through earnings on a quarterly
basis
in accordance with EITF NO. 00-19, Accounting
for Derivative Financial Instruments Indexed to, and Potentially Settled
in a
Company’s Common Stock.
28
On
February 28, 2006, the Company and Dolphin entered into a Cancellation and
Warrant Exchange Agreement (the “Cancellation Agreement “) under which Dolphin
agreed to cancel its Senior Subordinated Secured Convertible Promissory Note
and
cancel its outstanding warrant to purchase 380,952 shares of GSE common stock
at
an exercise price of $2.22 per share. In exchange for Dolphin’s agreement to
enter into the Cancellation Agreement and for the participation of Dolphin
Offshore Partners, LP in the Preferred Stock transaction discussed below,
the
Company repaid the Dolphin Note and agreed to issue a new warrant to
purchase 900,000 shares of GSE common stock at an exercise price of $0.67
per
share (“the Dolphin Warrant”). Dolphin must exercise the new warrant promptly
after the Company certifies to Dolphin on or after May 30, 2006 (the “Mandatory
Exercise Date”) that, among other things, the current stock price shall not be
less than $1.25 on the Mandatory Exercise Date and that the average of the
current stock prices for each trading day of the 30 calendar day period up
to
and including the Mandatory Exercise Date is not less than $1.25. At the
date of
issuance, the fair value of the Dolphin Warrant was $868,000, as established
using the Black-Scholes Model, and was recorded in paid-in capital with the
offset recorded as loss on extinguishment of debt.
In
conjunction with the early payoff of the Dolphin Note and the cancellation
of
the 380,952 warrants, the Company wrote off the remaining unamortized Original
Issue Discount of $1.1 million, wrote off the remaining unamortized deferred
financing charges of $185,000, recognized a credit of $698,000 from the
write-off of the liabilities related to the Dolphin Note conversion feature
and
the related warrants and took an $868,000 charge for the value of the 900,000
new warrants issued to Dolphin. The total loss on extinguishment of the Dolphin
Note and the cancellation of the related warrants totaled $1.4 million.
Series
A Cumulative Preferred Stock
On
February 28, 2006, the Company raised $3.9 million, net of associated fees
of
$395,000, through the sale of 42,500 shares of Series A Cumulative Convertible
Preferred Stock and Warrants by means of a private placement to “accredited
investors”, as that term is used in rules and regulations of the Securities and
Exchange Commission. The Convertible Preferred Stock is convertible at any
time
into a total of 2,401,130 shares of GSE common stock at a conversion price
of
$1.77 per share. The conversion price was equal to 110% of the closing price
of
the Company’s Common Stock on February 28, 2006, the date the sale of the
Convertible Preferred Stock was completed. Each investor received a five-year
warrant to purchase GSE common stock equal to 20% of the shares they would
receive from the conversion of the Convertible Preferred Stock, at an exercise
price of $1.77. In aggregate, the Company issued warrants to purchase a total
of
480,226 shares of GSE common stock. At
the
date of issuance, the fair value of the warrants was $342,000 and the fair
value
of the preferred stock was $3.9 million. The fair value of the warrants and
the
preferred stock was determined through the use of the relative fair value
method, in which the $4.25 million gross proceeds was allocated based upon
the
fair values of the warrants, as determined by using the Black-Scholes Model,
and
the preferred stock, as determined by an independent appraisal. The
Convertible Preferred Stock holders are entitled to an 8% cumulative dividend,
payable on a semiannual basis every June 30 and December 30. If the Company
does
not make two consecutive dividend payments on the dates such payments are
due,
there will be an additional 30% warrant coverage of five-year warrants at
a
conversion price of $1.77 per share. At any time after March 1, 2007, the
Company has the right to convert the Preferred Stock into shares of GSE common
stock when the average of the current stock price during the twenty trading
days
immediately prior to the date of such conversion exceeds 200% of the Series
A
Conversion Price. The holders of the Convertible Preferred Stock are entitled
to
vote on all matters submitted to the stockholders for a vote, together with
the
holders of the voting common stock, all voting together as a single class.
The
holders of the Convertible Preferred Stock are entitled to the number of
votes
equal to the number of GSE common stock that they would receive upon conversion
of their Convertible Preferred Stock.
The
Company paid the placement agent 6% of the gross proceeds received by the
Company from the offering ($255,000) plus five-year warrants to purchase
150,000
shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $1.77 per share. In
addition to the placement agent fee, the Company paid $140,000 of other
transaction fees related to the offering. At the date of issuance, the
fair
value of the placement agent warrants was $128,000, as established using
the
Black-Scholes Model, and was recorded in paid-in capital, with the offset
recognized as a reduction of the preferred stock proceeds.
The
proceeds were used to payoff the Dolphin Note and the Company’s bank line of
credit balance and for other working capital purposes.
29
Accounting
Standard Adopted
In
December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement
of Financial Accounting Standard (SFAS) No. 123R, Share-Based
Payment
(SFAS
No. 123R), which revises SFAS No. 123, Accounting
for Stock-Based Compensation (SFAS
No.
123), and supersedes Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, Accounting
for Stock Issued to Employees
(APB
No. 25), and requires companies to recognize compensation expense for all
equity-based compensation awards issued to employees that are expected
to vest.
The Company adopted SFAS No. 123R on January 1, 2006, using the Modified
Prospective Application method without restatement of prior periods. Under
this
method, the Company would begin to amortize compensation cost for the remaining
portion of its outstanding awards for which the requisite service was not
yet
rendered as of January 1, 2006. However, at January 1, 2006, all of the
Company’s outstanding options were fully vested and thus there will be no
compensation expense in 2006 related to the adoption of SFAS No. 123R on
these
outstanding options. The Company will determine the fair value of and account
for awards that are granted, modified, or settled after January 1, 2006
in
accordance with SFAS No. 123R.
During
the three months ended March 31, 2006, the Company recognized $10,000 of
pre-tax
stock-based compensation expense under the fair value method in accordance
with
SFAS No. 123R. As of March 31, 2006, the Company had $446,000 of unrecognized
compensation related to the unvested portion of outstanding stock option
awards
expected to be recognized through March 2009.
Item
3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure about Market
Risk
The
Company’s market risk is principally confined to changes in foreign currency
exchange rates. The Company’s exposure to foreign exchange rate fluctuations
arises in part from inter-company accounts in which costs incurred in one entity
are charged to other entities in different foreign jurisdictions. The Company
is
also exposed to foreign exchange rate fluctuations as the financial results
of
all foreign subsidiaries are translated into U.S. dollars in consolidation.
As
exchange rates vary, those results when translated may vary from expectations
and adversely impact overall expected profitability.
The
Company utilizes forward foreign currency financial instruments to manage market
risks associated with the fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates.
It is
the Company's policy to use derivative financial instruments to protect against
market risk arising in the normal course of business. The criteria the Company
uses for designating an instrument as a hedge include the instrument's
effectiveness in risk reduction and one-to-one matching of derivative
instruments to underlying transactions. The Company monitors its foreign
currency exposures to maximize the overall effectiveness of its foreign currency
hedge positions. The principal currency hedged is the Japanese yen. The
Company's objectives for holding derivatives are to minimize the risks using
the
most effective methods to reduce the impact of these exposures. The Company
minimizes credit exposure by limiting counterparties to nationally recognized
financial institutions.
As
of
March 31, 2006, the Company had contracts for the sale of approximately 237
million Japanese Yen at fixed rates. The contracts expire on various dates
through May 2007. The Company has not designated the contracts as hedges and,
accordingly, has recorded the estimated fair value of the contracts of $23,000
as of March 31, 2006 in other assets. The Company recognized unrealized
gains (losses) of approximately ($9,000) and $54,000 in the first quarter 2006
and 2005, respectively, on these contracts.
The
Company is also subject to market risk related to the interest rate on its
existing line of credit. As of March 31, 2005, such interest rate is based
on
the prime rate plus 200 basis-points. A 100 basis-point change in such rate
during the three months ended March 31, 2006 would have increased (decreased)
the Company’s interest expense by approximately $2,000.
30
Item
4.
Controls and Procedures
(a)
Evaluation
of disclosure controls and procedures.
Based
on their evaluation as of the end of the period covered by this Form 10-Q,
the
Company’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer have
concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Rules 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”))
are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company
in reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded,
processed, and summarized and reported within the time periods specified in
Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms.
(b)
Changes
in internal control. There
were no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that
occurred during the most recent fiscal quarter that have materially affected,
or
are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over
financial reporting.
31
PART
II - OTHER INFORMATION
Item
1.
Legal
Proceedings
In
accordance with its conduct in the ordinary course of business, certain actions
and proceedings are pending to which the Company is a party. In the opinion
of
management, the aggregate liabilities, if any, arising from such actions are
not
expected to have a material adverse effect on the financial condition of the
Company.
Item
1A.
Risk Factors
The
Company has no material changes to the disclosure on this matter made in its
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31,
2005.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
None
Item
3.
Defaults Upon Senior Securities
None
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
None
Item
5.
Other Information
None
Item
6.
Exhibits
31.1 Certification
of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes- Oxley
Act of 2002.
31.2
Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.1 Certification
of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32
SIGNATURES
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant
has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto
duly authorized.
Date:
May
15, 2006
GSE
SYSTEMS, INC.
/S/
JOHN V. MORAN
John
V.
Moran
Chief
Executive Officer
(Principal
Executive Officer)
/S/
JEFFERY G. HOUGH
Jeffery
G. Hough
Senior
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal
Financial and Accounting Officer)