GUIDED THERAPEUTICS INC - Annual Report: 2019 (Form 10-K)

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

FORM 10-K

(Mark One)

OR

For the transition period from ____________ to ____________

 

Commission file number: 0-22179

 

GUIDED THERAPEUTICS, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

Delaware		58-2029543
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

 

5835 Peachtree Corners East, Suite B Norcross, Georgia		30092
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)

 

Securities registered under Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act: None

Securities registered under Section 12(g) of the Act:

 Common Stock, $0.001 par value

(Title of class)

 

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ☐ No ☒

 

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes ☐ No ☒

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☐ No ☒

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ☒ No ☐

 

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. Yes ☒ No ☐

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.

 

Large accelerated filer ☐	Accelerated filer ☐
Non-accelerated filer ☐	Smaller reporting company ☒
Emerging growth company ☐

 

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act ☐

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes ☐ No ☒

 

The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates was approximately $500,000 as of December 31, 2019 (the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed fiscal quarter).

 

As of April 17, 2020, the registrant had 11,308,191 shares of common stock outstanding.

 

 

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE. None.

 

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

PART I	3
ITEM 1. BUSINESS	3
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS	10
ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS	20
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES	20
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS	20
ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES	20
PART II	21
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES	21
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA	21
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS	22
ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.	29
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA	30
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE	62
ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES	62
ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION	62
PART III	63
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE	63
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION	65
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS	67
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE	68
ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES	69
PART IV	70
ITEM 15. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES	70
ITEM 16. FORM 10-K SUMMARY	70
SIGNATURES	71

 

 

PART I

 

Item 1. Business

 

Overview

We are a medical technology company focused on developing innovative medical devices that have the potential to improve healthcare. Our primary focus is the sales and marketing of our LuViva® Advanced Cervical Scan non-invasive cervical cancer detection device. The underlying technology of LuViva primarily relates to the use of biophotonics for the non-invasive detection of cancers. LuViva is designed to identify cervical cancers and precancers painlessly, non-invasively and at the point of care by scanning the cervix with light, then analyzing the reflected and fluorescent light.

 

LuViva provides a less invasive and painless alternative to conventional tests for cervical cancer screening and detection. Additionally, LuViva improves patient well-being not only because it eliminates pain, but also because it is convenient to use and provides rapid results at the point of care. We focus on two primary applications for LuViva: first, as a cancer screening tool in the developing world, where infrastructure to support traditional cancer-screening methods is limited or non-existent, and second, as a triage following traditional screening in the developed world, where a high number of false positive results cause a high rate of unnecessary and ultimately costly follow-up tests.

 

Screening for cervical cancer represents one of the most significant demands on the practice of diagnostic medicine. As cervical cancer is linked to a sexually transmitted disease—the human papillomavirus (HPV)—every woman essentially becomes “at risk” for cervical cancer simply after becoming sexually active. In the developing world, there are approximately 2.0 billion women aged 15 and older who are potentially eligible for screening with LuViva. Guidelines for screening intervals vary across the world, but U.S. guidelines call for screening every three years. Traditionally, the Pap smear screening test, or Pap test, is the primary cervical cancer screening methodology in the developed world. However, in developing countries, cancer screening using Pap tests is expensive and requires infrastructure and skill not currently existing, and not likely to be developed in the near future, in these countries.

 

We believe LuViva is the answer to the developing world’s cervical cancer screening needs. Screening for cervical cancer in the developing world often requires working directly with foreign governments or non-governmental agencies (NGOs). By partnering with governments or NGOs, we can provide immediate access to cervical cancer detection to large segments of a nation’s population as part of national or regional governmental healthcare programs, eliminating the need to develop expensive and resource-intensive infrastructures.

 

In the developed world, we believe LuViva offers a more accurate and ultimately cost-effective triage medical device, to be used once a traditional Pap test or HPV test indicates the possibility of cervical cancer. Due to the high number of false positive results from Pap tests, traditional follow-on tests entail increased medical treatment costs. We believe these costs can be minimized by utilizing LuViva as a triage to determine whether and to what degree follow-on tests are warranted.

 

We believe our non-invasive cervical cancer detection technology can be applied to the early detection of other cancers as well. In 2013, we announced a license agreement with Konica Minolta, Inc. allowing us to manufacture and develop a non-invasive esophageal cancer detection product from Konica Minolta based on our biophotonic technology platform. Early market analyses of our biophotonic technology indicated that skin cancer detection was also promising, but currently we are focused primarily on the large-scale commercialization of LuViva.

 

Cancer

 

Cancer is a group of many related diseases. All forms of cancer involve the out-of-control growth and spread of abnormal cells. Normal cells grow, divide, and die in an orderly fashion. Cancer cells, however, continue to grow and divide and can spread to other parts of the body. In America, half of all men and one-third of all women will develop some form of cancer during their lifetimes. According to the American Cancer Society, the sooner a cancer is found and treatment begins, the better a patient’s chances are of being cured. We began investigating the applications of our biophotonic technology to cancer detection before 1997, when we initiated a preliminary market analysis. We concluded that our biophotonic technology had applications for the detection of a variety of cancers through the exposure of tissue to light. We selected detection of cervical cancer and skin cancer from a list of the ten most promising applications to pursue initially, and ultimately focused primarily on our LuViva cervical cancer detection device.

 

Cervical cancer is a cancer that begins in the lining of the cervix (which is located in the lower part of the uterus). Cervical cancer forms over time and may spread to other parts of the body if left untreated. There is generally a gradual change from a normal cervix to a cervix with precancerous cells to cervical cancer. For some women, precancerous changes may go away without any treatment. While the majority of precancerous changes in the cervix do not advance to cancer, if precancers are treated, the risk that they will become cancers can be greatly reduced.

 

 

The Developing World

 

According to the most recent data published by the World Health Organization (WHO), cervical cancer is the fourth most frequent cancer in women worldwide, with an estimated 570,000 new cases in 2018, an increase of 40,000 cases from 2012. For women living in less developed regions, however, cervical cancer is the second most common cancer, and 9 out of 10 women who die from cervical cancer reside in low- and middle-income countries. In 2018, GLOBOCAN, the international cancer tracking agency, estimated that approximately 311,000 women died from cervical cancer, with 85% to 90% of these deaths occurring in low- and middle-income countries.

 

As noted by the WHO, in developed countries, programs are in place that enable women to get screened, making most pre-cancerous lesions identifiable at stages when they can easily be treated. Early treatment prevents up to 80% of cervical cancers in these countries. In developing countries, however, limited access to effective screening means that the disease is often not identified until it is further advanced and symptoms develop. In addition, prospects for treatment of such late-stage disease may be poor, resulting in a higher rate of death from cervical cancer in these countries.

 

We believe that the greatest need and market opportunity for LuViva lies in screening for cervical cancer in developing countries where the infrastructure for traditional screening may be limited or non-existent.

 

We are actively working with distributors in the following countries to implement government-sponsored screening programs: Turkey, Indonesia, and Nigeria. The number of screening candidates in those countries is approximately 131 million and Indonesia and Nigeria represent 2 of the 10 most populous countries in the world.

 

The Developed World

 

The Pap test, which involves a sample of cervical tissue being placed on a slide and observed in a laboratory, is currently the most common form of cervical cancer screening. Since the introduction of screening and diagnostic methods, the number of cervical cancer deaths in the developed world has declined dramatically, due mainly to the increased use of the Pap test. However, the Pap test has a wide variation in sensitivity, which is the ability to detect the disease, and specificity, which is the ability to exclude false positives. A study by Duke University for the U.S. Agency for Health Care Policy and Research published in 1999 showed Pap test performance ranging from a 22%-95% sensitivity and 78%-10% specificity, although new technologies improving the sensitivity and specificity of the Pap test have recently been introduced and are finding acceptance in the marketplace. About 60 million Pap tests are given annually in the United States, at an average price of approximately $26 per test.

 

After a Pap test returns a positive result for cervical cancer, accepted protocol calls for a visual examination of the cervix using a colposcope, usually followed by a biopsy, or tissue sampling, at one or more locations on the cervix. This method looks for visual changes attributable to cancer. There are about two million colposcope examinations annually in the United States and Europe. In 2003, the average cost of a stand-alone colposcope examination in the United States was $185 and the average cost of a colposcopy with biopsy was $277.

 

Given this landscape, we believe that there is a material need and market opportunity for LuViva as a triage device in the developed world where LuViva represents a more cost-effective method of verifying a positive Pap test than the alternatives.

 

The LuViva Advanced Cervical Scan

 

LuViva is designed to identify cervical cancers and precancers painlessly, non-invasively and at the point of care by scanning the cervix with light, then analyzing the light reflected from the cervix. The information presented by the light would be used to indicate the likelihood of cervical cancer or precancers. Our product, in addition to detecting the structural changes attributed to cervical cancer, is also designed to detect the biochemical changes that precede the development of visual lesions. In this way, cervical cancer may be detected earlier in its development, which should increase the chances of effective treatment. In addition to the device itself, operation of LuViva requires employment of our single-use, disposable calibration and alignment cervical guide.

 

To date, thousands of women in multiple international clinical settings have been tested with LuViva. As a result, more than 25 papers and presentations have been published regarding LuViva in a clinical setting, including at the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics Congress in London in 2015 and at the Indonesian National Obstetrics and Gynecology (POGI) Meeting in Solo in 2016.

 

Internationally, we contract with country-specific or regional distributors. We believe that the international market will be significantly larger than the U.S. market due to the international demand for cervical cancer screening. We have executed formal distribution agreements covering 54 countries and still have active contracts in place for countries that cover roughly half of the world’s population, including China and Southeast Asia (including Indonesia), Eastern Europe and Russia as well as the Middle East (including Turkey). In 2020, we intend to focus on other large markets such as those in the European Union, India,and certain Latin American countries, such as Mexico.

 

 

We have previously obtained regulatory approval to sell LuViva in Europe under our Edition 3 CE Mark. Additionally, LuViva has also obtained marketing approval from Health Canada, COFEPRIS in Mexico, Ministry of Health in Kenya and the Singapore Health Sciences Authority. In addition, in 2018, we were approved for sales and marketing in India. We currently are seeking regulatory approval to market LuViva in the United States but have not yet received approval from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). As of December 31, 2019, we have sold 140 LuViva devices and approximately 76,780 single-use-disposable cervical guides to international distributors.

 

We believe our non-invasive cervical cancer detection technology can be applied to the early detection of other cancers as well. From 2008 to early 2013, we worked with Konica Minolta to explore the feasibility of adapting our microporation and biophotonic cancer detection technology to other areas of medicine and to determine potential markets for these products in anticipation of a development agreement. In February 2013, we replaced our existing agreements with Konica Minolta with a new agreement, pursuant to which, subject to the payment of a nominal license fee due upon FDA approval, Konica Minolta has granted us a five-year, world-wide, non-transferable and non-exclusive right and license to manufacture and to develop a non-invasive esophageal cancer detection product from Konica Minolta and based on our biophotonic technology platform. The license permits us to use certain related intellectual property of Konica Minolta. In return for the license, we have agreed to pay Konica Minolta a royalty for each licensed product we sell. We continue to seek new collaborative partners to further develop our biophotonic technology.

 

Manufacturing, Sales Marketing and Distribution

We manufacture LuViva at our Norcross, Georgia facility. Most of the components of LuViva are custom made for us by third-party manufacturers. We adhere to ISO 13485:2003 quality standards in our manufacturing processes. Our single-use cervical guides are manufactured by a vendor that specializes in injection molding of plastic medical products. On January 22, 2017, we entered into a license agreement with Shandong Yaohua Medical Instrument Corporation (“SMI”) pursuant to which we granted SMI an exclusive global license to manufacture the LuViva device and related disposables (subject to a carve-out for manufacture in Turkey). On December 18, 2018, we entered into a co-development agreement with Newmars Technologies, Inc. (“NTI”), whereby NTI will perform final assembly of the LuViva device for its contracted distribution countries in Eastern Europe and Russia at its ISO 13485 facility in Hungary. This additional carve out has been agreed to by SMI.

 

We rely on distributors to sell our products. Distributors can be country exclusive or cover multiple countries in a region. We manage these distributors, provide them marketing materials and train them to demonstrate and operate LuViva. We seek distributors that have experience in gynecology and in introducing new technology into their assigned territories.

 

We have only limited experience in the production planning, quality system management, facility development, and production scaling that will be needed to bring production to increased sustained commercial levels. We will likely need to develop additional expertise in order to successfully manufacture, market, and distribute any future products.

 

Research, Development and Engineering

 

We have been engaged primarily in the research, development and testing of our LuViva non-invasive cervical cancer detection product and our core biophotonic technology. Since 2013, we have incurred approximately $7.8 million in research and development expenses, net of about $927,000 reimbursed through collaborative arrangements and government grants. Research and development costs were approximately $0.1 and $0.2 million in 2019 and 2018, respectively.

 

Since 2013, we have focused our research and development and our engineering resources almost exclusively on development of our biophotonic technology, with only limited support of other programs funded through government contracts or third-party funding. Because our research and clinical development programs for other cancers are at a very early stage, substantial additional research and development and clinical trials will be necessary before we can produce commercial prototypes of other cancer detection products.

 

Several of the components used in LuViva currently are available from only one supplier, and substitutes for these components could not be obtained easily or would require substantial modifications to our products.

 

Patents

We have pursued a course of developing and acquiring patents and patent rights and licensing technology. Our success depends in large part on our ability to establish and maintain the proprietary nature of our technology through the patent process and to license from other’s patents and patent applications necessary to develop our products. As of December 31, 2019, we have 16 granted U.S. patents relating to our biophotonic cancer detection technology that were developed in-house and are owned by the Company. Currently we do not own third party patents nor do we make any outside payments for patents.

 

 

As of April 14, 2020, patents 6,400,875, 6,577,391, and 6,870,620 had expired.

 

Patent No.	Title	Ctry	Grant Date	Expiration Date
6,400,875	Method for Protecting A Fiber Optic Probe And The Resulting Fiber Optic Probe	US	06/04/2002	11/01/2019
6,577,391	Apparatus And Method For Determining Tissue Characteristics	US	06/10/2003	03/24/2020
6,590,651	Apparatus and Method for Determining Tissue Characteristics	US	07/08/2003	11/16/2020
6,792,982	Vacuum Source For Harvesting Substances	US	09/21/2004	07/23/2023
6,870,620	Apparatus And Method For Determining Tissue Characteristics	US	03/22/2005	03/24/2020
6,975,889	Multi-Modal Optical Cancer Diagnostic System	US	12/13/2005	03/09/2021
7,006,220	Apparatus and Method for Determining Tissue Characteristics	US	02/28/2006	11/16/2020
7,174,927	Vacuum Source For Harvesting Substances	US	02/13/2007	09/03/2024
7,301,629	Apparatus and Method for Determining Tissue Characteristics	US	11/27/2007	07/03/2023
7,335,166	System And Methods For Fluid Extractions And Monitoring	US	02/26/2008	05/22/2023
8,644,912	Method and Apparatus For Determining Tissue Characteristics	US	02/04/2014	11/16/2020
8,781,560	Method and Apparatus For Rapid Detection and Diagnosis of Tissue Abnormalities	US	07/15/2014	07/14/2031
9,561,003	Method and Apparatus For Rapid Detection and Diagnosis of Tissue Abnormalities	US	02/07/2017	07/14/2031
D714453	Mobile Cart and Hand Held Unit for Diagnostics of Measurement	US	09/30/2014	09/30/2028
D724199	Medical Diagnostic Stand Off Tube	US	03/10/2015	03/10/2029
D746475	Mobile Cart and Hand Held Unit for Diagnostics or Measurement	US	12/29/2015	12/29/2029

 

In addition to the patents listed above, the Company owns four additional corresponding foreign patents and has applied for two additional US patents, although there is no assurance that these patents will be granted.  The Company’s strategy is to continue improving its products and filing new patents to protect those improvements.

 

In the United States, additional years of patent protection may be added (on a case by case basis) beyond the standard patent terms under the 1984 Drug Price Competition and Patent Term Restoration Act, also known as the Hatch-Waxman Act.  The Hatch-Waxman act includes Section 156, which provides for the extension of the term of a granted patent (PTE) under certain circumstances. The intent behind Section 156 is to extend patent life to compensate patent holders for patent term lost while developing their product and awaiting FDA approval.  The Company’s patents qualify under Section 156 because LuViva has not yet been commercialized in the United States and it is being regulated by FDA as a Class III Medical Device.

 

Competition

The medical device industry in general and the markets for cervical cancer detection in particular, are intensely competitive. If successful in our product development, we will compete with other providers of cervical cancer detection and prevention products.

 

Current cervical cancer screening and diagnostic tests, primarily the Pap test, HPV test, and colposcopy, are well established and pervasive. Improvements and new technologies for cervical cancer detection and prevention, such as Thin-Prep from Hologic and HPV testing from Qiagen, have led to other new competitors. In addition, there are other companies attempting to develop products using forms of biophotonic technologies in cervical cancer detection, such as Spectrascience, which has a very limited U.S. FDA approval to market its device for detection of cervical cancers, but has not yet entered the market. The approval limits use of the Spectrascience device only after a colposcopy, as an adjunct. In addition to the Spectrascience device, there are other technologies that are seeking to enter the market as adjuncts to colposcopy, including devices from Dysis and Zedco. While these technologies are not direct competitors to LuViva, modifications to them or other new technologies will require us to develop devices that are more accurate, easier to use or less costly to administer so that our products have a competitive advantage.

 

In April 2014, the U.S. FDA approved the use of the Roche cobas HPV test as a primary screener for cervical cancer. Using a sample of cervical cells, the cobas HPV test detects DNA from 14 high-risk HPV types. The test specifically identifies HPV 16 and HPV 18, while concurrently detecting 12 other types of high-risk HPVs. This could make HPV testing a competitor to the Pap test. However, due to its lower specificity, we believe that screening with HPV will increase the number of false positive results if widely adopted.

 

In June 2006, the U.S. FDA approved the HPV vaccine Gardasil from drug maker Merck. Gardasil is a prophylactic HPV vaccine, meaning that it is designed to prevent the initial establishment of HPV infections. For maximum efficacy, it is recommended that girls receive the vaccine prior to becoming sexually active. Since Gardasil will not block infection with all of the HPV types that can cause cervical cancer, the vaccine should not be considered a substitute for routine Pap tests. On October 16, 2009, GlaxoSmithKline PLC was granted approval in the United States for a similar preventive HPV vaccine, known as Cervarix. Due to the limited availability and lack of 100% protection against all potentially cancer-causing strains of HPV, we believe that the vaccines will have a limited impact on the cervical cancer screening and diagnostic market for many years.

 

 

Government Regulation

 

The medical devices that we manufacture are subject to regulation by numerous regulatory bodies, including the CFDA, the U.S. FDA, and comparable international regulatory agencies. These agencies require manufacturers of medical devices to comply with applicable laws and regulations governing the development, testing, manufacturing, labeling, marketing and distribution of medical devices. Devices are generally subject to varying levels of regulatory control, the most comprehensive of which requires that a clinical evaluation program be conducted before a device receives approval for commercial distribution.

 

In the European Union, medical devices are required to comply with the Medical Devices Directive and obtain CE Mark certification in order to market medical devices. The CE Mark certification, granted following approval from an independent “Notified Body,” is an international symbol of adherence to quality assurance standards and compliance with applicable European Medical Devices Directives. From 2017 through 2019, we were unable to pay the annual registration fees to maintain our ISO 13485:2003 certification and our CE Mark. Once our financing is completed, we will make the required payments and reobtain both certifications. In addition, our December 21, 2018 agreement with Newmars, described above, will allow final assembly at their ISO 13485:2016 accredited facility. Once all inspections have been passed for LuViva, this will allow an alternative path for obtaining the CE Mark.

 

China has a regulatory regime similar to that of the European Union, but due to interaction with the U.S. regulatory regime, the CFDA also shares some similarities with its U.S. counterpart. Devices are classified by the CFDA’s Center for Medical Device Evaluation (CMDE) into three categories based on medical risk, with the level of regulatory oversight determined by degree of risk and invasiveness. CMDE’s device classifications and definitions are as follows:

 

 

Based on the above definitions and several discussions with regulatory consultants and potential partners, we believe that LuViva is most likely to be classified as a Class II device, however, this is not certain and the CFDA may determine that LuViva requires a Class III registration. Class III registrations are granted by the national CFDA office while Class I and II registrations occur at the provincial level. Typically, registration granted at the provincial level allows a medical device to be marketed in all of China’s provinces.

 

While Class I devices usually do not require clinical trial data from Chinese patients and Class III devices almost always do, Class II medical devices sometimes do and sometimes do not require Chinese clinical trials, and this determination may depend on the claim for the device and quality of clinical trials conducted outside of China. If clinical trials conducted in China are required, they usually are less burdensome for Class II devices than Class III devices.

 

CFDA labs also conduct electrical, mechanical and electromagnetic emission safety testing for medical devices similar to those required for the CE Mark. As is the case with the U.S. FDA, manufacturers in China undergo periodic inspections and must comply with international quality standards such as ISO 13485 for medical devices. As part of our agreement with SMI, SMI will underwrite the cost of securing approval of LuViva with the CFDA.

 

In the United States, permission to distribute a new device generally can be met in one of two ways. The first process requires that a pre-market notification (510(k) Submission) be made to the U.S. FDA to demonstrate that the device is as safe and effective as, or substantially equivalent to, a legally marketed device that is not subject to premarket approval (PMA). A legally marketed device is a device that (1) was legally marketed prior to May 28, 1976, (2) has been reclassified from Class III to Class II or I, or (3) has been found to be substantially equivalent to another legally marketed device following a 510(k) Submission. The legally marketed device to which equivalence is drawn is known as the “predicate” device. Applicants must submit descriptive data and, when necessary, performance data to establish that the device is substantially equivalent to a predicate device. In some instances, data from human clinical studies must also be submitted in support of a 510(k) Submission. If so, these data must be collected in a manner that conforms with specific requirements in accordance with federal regulations. The U.S. FDA must issue an order finding substantial equivalence before commercial distribution can occur. Changes to existing devices covered by a 510(k) Submission which do not significantly affect safety or effectiveness can generally be made by us without additional 510(k) Submissions.

 

The second process requires that an application for premarket approval (PMA) be made to the U.S. FDA to demonstrate that the device is safe and effective for its intended use as manufactured. This approval process applies to most Class III devices, including LuViva. In this case, two steps of U.S. FDA approval are generally required before marketing in the United States can begin. First, investigational device exemption (IDE) regulations must be complied with in connection with any human clinical investigation of the device in the United States. Second, the U.S. FDA must review the PMA application, which contains, among other things, clinical information acquired under the IDE. The U.S. FDA will approve the PMA application if it finds that there is a reasonable assurance that the device is safe and effective for its intended purpose.

 

 

We completed enrollment in our U.S. FDA pivotal trial of LuViva in 2008 and, after the U.S. FDA requested two-years of follow-up data for patients enrolled in the study, the U.S. FDA accepted our completed PMA application on November 18, 2010, effective September 23, 2010, for substantive review. On March 7, 2011, we announced that the U.S. FDA had inspected two clinical trial sites and audited our clinical trial data base systems as part of its review process and raised no formal compliance issues. On January 20, 2012, we announced our intent to seek an independent panel review of our PMA application after receiving a “not-approvable” letter from the U.S. FDA. On November 14, 2012 we filed an amended PMA with the U.S. FDA. On September 6, 2013, we received a letter from the U.S. FDA with additional questions and met with the U.S. FDA on May 8, 2014 to discuss our response. On July 25, 2014, we announced that we had responded to the U.S. FDA’s most recent questions.

 

We received a “not-approvable” letter from the U.S. FDA on May 15, 2015. We had a follow up meeting with the U.S. FDA to discuss a path forward on November 30, 2015, at which we agreed to submit a detailed clinical protocol for U.S. FDA review so that additional studies can be completed. We held a follow up teleconference with FDA on January 28, 2020 and filed a pre-submission document to the Agency on February 17, 2020 that summarized the clinical protocol to be submitted for FDA review. These studies may not be completed in 2020, although we intend to pursue FDA approval and start studies in 2020 once funds are available. We remain committed to obtaining U.S. FDA approval, but at the same time we are focused on international sales growth, where we believe the commercial opportunities are larger and the clinical need is more significant.

 

The process of obtaining clearance to market products is costly and time-consuming in virtually all of the major markets in which we sell, or expect to sell, our products and may delay the marketing and sale of our products. Countries around the world have recently adopted more stringent regulatory requirements, which are expected to add to the delays and uncertainties associated with new product releases, as well as the clinical and regulatory costs of supporting those releases. No assurance can be given that our products will be approved on a timely basis in any particular jurisdiction, if at all. In addition, regulations regarding the development, manufacture and sale of medical devices are subject to future change. We cannot predict what impact, if any, those changes might have on our business. Failure to comply with regulatory requirements could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

 

Noncompliance with applicable requirements can result in import detentions, fines, civil penalties, injunctions, suspensions or losses of regulatory approvals or clearances, recall or seizure of products, operating restrictions, denial of export applications, governmental prohibitions on entering into supply contracts, and criminal prosecution. Failure to obtain regulatory approvals or the restriction, suspension or revocation of regulatory approvals or clearances, as well as any other failure to comply with regulatory requirements, would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

 

Regulatory approvals and clearances, if granted, may include significant labeling limitations and limitations on the indicated uses for which the product may be marketed. In addition, to obtain regulatory approvals and clearances, the U.S. FDA and some foreign regulatory authorities impose numerous other requirements with which medical device manufacturers must comply. U.S. FDA enforcement policy strictly prohibits the marketing of approved medical devices for unapproved uses. Any products we manufacture or distribute under U.S. FDA clearances or approvals are subject to pervasive and continuing regulation by the U.S. FDA. The U.S. FDA also requires us to provide it with information on death and serious injuries alleged to have been associated with the use of our products, as well as any malfunctions that would likely cause or contribute to death or serious injury.

 

The U.S. FDA requires us to register as a medical device manufacturer and list our products. We are also subject to inspections by the U.S. FDA and state agencies acting under contract with the U.S. FDA to confirm compliance with good manufacturing practice. These regulations require that we manufacture our products and maintain documents in a prescribed manner with respect to manufacturing, testing, quality assurance and quality control activities. The U.S. FDA also has promulgated final regulatory changes to these regulations that require, among other things, design controls and maintenance of service records. These changes will increase the cost of complying with good manufacturing practice requirements.

 

Distributors of medical devices may also be required to comply with other foreign regulatory agencies, and we or our distributors currently have marketing approval for LuViva from Health Canada, COFEPRIS in Mexico, the Ministry of Health in Kenya, and the Singapore Health Sciences Authority. The time required to obtain these foreign approvals to market our products may be longer or shorter than that required in China or the United States, and requirements for those approvals may differ from those required by the CFDA or the U.S. FDA.

 

We are also subject to a variety of other controls that affect our business. Labeling and promotional activities are subject to scrutiny by the U.S. FDA and, in some instances, by the U.S. Federal Trade Commission. The U.S. FDA actively enforces regulations prohibiting marketing of products for unapproved users. We are also subject, as are our products, to a variety of state and local laws and regulations in those states and localities where our products are or will be marketed. Any applicable state or local regulations may hinder our ability to market our products in those regions. Manufacturers are also subject to numerous federal, state and local laws relating to matters such as safe working conditions, manufacturing practices, environmental protection, fire hazard control and disposal of hazardous or potentially hazardous substances. We may be required to incur significant costs to comply with these laws and regulations now or in the future. These laws or regulations may have a material adverse effect on our ability to do business.

 

 

Although our marketing and distribution partners around the world assist in the regulatory approval process, ultimately, we are be responsible for obtaining and maintaining regulatory approvals for our products. The inability or failure to comply with the varying regulations or the imposition of new regulations would materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

 

Employees and Consultants

As of December 31, 2019, we had five regular employees and three consultants to provide services to us on a full- or part-time basis. Of the eight people employed or engaged by us, two are engaged in engineering, manufacturing and development, two are engaged in sales and marketing activities, one is engaged in clinical testing and regulatory affairs, and three are engaged in administration and accounting. No employees are covered by collective bargaining agreements, and we believe we maintain good relations with our employees.

 

Our ability to operate successfully and manage our potential future growth depends in significant part upon the continued service of key scientific, technical, managerial and finance personnel, and our ability to attract and retain additional highly qualified personnel in these fields. Two of these key employees have an employment contract with us; none are covered by key person or similar insurance. In addition, if we are able to successfully develop and commercialize our products, we likely will need to hire additional scientific, technical, marketing, managerial and finance personnel. We face intense competition for qualified personnel in these areas, many of whom are often subject to competing employment offers. The loss of key personnel or our inability to hire and retain additional qualified personnel in the future could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

 

Corporate History

We are a Delaware corporation, originally incorporated in 1992 under the name “SpectRx, Inc.,” and, on February 22, 2008, changed our name to Guided Therapeutics, Inc. At the same time, we renamed our wholly owned subsidiary, InterScan, which originally had been incorporated as “Guided Therapeutics.”

 

Our principal executive and operations facility is located at 5835 Peachtree Corners East, Suite B, Norcross, Georgia 30092, and our telephone number is (770) 242-8723.

 

 

Item 1A. Risk Factors

 

In addition to the other information in this annual report on Form 10-K, the following risk factors should be considered carefully in evaluating us.

 

Risks Related to Our Business

 

Although we will be required to raise additional funds in 2020, there is no assurance that such funds can be raised on terms that we would find acceptable, on a timely basis, or at all.

Additional debt or equity financing will be required for us to continue as a going concern. We may seek to obtain additional funds for the financing of our cervical cancer detection business through additional debt or equity financings and/or new collaborative arrangements. Management believes that additional financing, if obtainable, will be sufficient to support planned operations only for a limited period. Management has implemented operating actions to reduce cash requirements. Any required additional funding may not be available on terms attractive to us, on a timely basis, or at all. If we cannot obtain additional funds or achieve profitability, we may not be able to continue as a going concern.

 

Because we must obtain additional funds through financing transactions or through new collaborative arrangements in order to grow the revenues of our cervical cancer detection product line, there exists substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. Therefore, it will be necessary to raise additional funds. There can be no assurance that we will be able to raise these additional funds. If we do not secure additional funding when needed, we will be unable to conduct all of our product development efforts as planned, which may cause us to alter our business plan in relation to the development of our products. Even if we obtain additional funding, we will need to achieve profitability thereafter.

 

Our independent registered public accountants’ report on our consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2019, indicated that there was substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern because we had suffered recurring losses from operations and had an accumulated deficit of $139.6 million at December 31, 2019 summarized as follows:

 

Accumulated deficit, from inception to 12/31/2017	$138.6 million
Preferred dividends	$ 0.1 million
Net Profit for fiscal year 2018, ended 12/31/2018	$ (1.0) million
Accumulated deficit, from inception to 12/31/2018	$137.7 million
Net Loss for year to date ended 12/31/2019	$ 1.9 million
Accumulated deficit, from inception to 12/31/2019	$139.6 million

 

Our management has implemented reductions in operating expenditures and reductions in some development activities. We have determined to make cervical cancer detection the focus of our business. We are managing the development of our other programs only when funds are made available to us via grants or contracts with government entities or strategic partners. However, there can be no assurance that we will be able to successfully implement or continue these plans.

 

If we cannot obtain additional funds when needed, we will not be able to implement our business plan.

 

We require substantial additional capital to develop our products, including completing product testing and clinical trials, obtaining all required regulatory approvals and clearances, beginning and scaling up manufacturing, and marketing our products. We have historically financed our operations though the public and private sale of debt and equity, funding from collaborative arrangements, and grants. Any failure to achieve adequate funding in a timely fashion would delay our development programs and could lead to abandonment of our business plan. To the extent we cannot obtain additional funding, our ability to continue to manufacture and sell our current products, or develop and introduce new products to market, will be limited. Further, financing our operations through the public or private sale of debt or equity may involve restrictive covenants or other provisions that could limit how we conduct our business or finance our operations. Financing our operations through collaborative arrangements generally means that the obligations of the collaborative partner to fund our expenditures are largely discretionary and depend on a number of factors, including our ability to meet specified milestones in the development and testing of the relevant product. We may not be able to obtain an acceptable collaboration partner, and even if we do, we may not be able to meet these milestones, or the collaborative partner may not continue to fund our expenditures.

 

We do not have a long operating history, especially in the cancer detection field, which makes it difficult to evaluate our business.

 

Although we have been in existence since 1992, we have only recently begun to commercialize our cervical cancer detection technology. Because limited historical information is available on our revenue trends and manufacturing costs, it is difficult to evaluate our business. Our prospects must be considered in light of the substantial risks, expenses, uncertainties and difficulties encountered by entrants into the medical device industry, which is characterized by increasing intense competition and a high failure rate.

 

 

We have a history of losses, and we expect losses to continue.

 

We have never been profitable and we have had operating losses since our inception. We expect our operating losses to continue as we continue to expend substantial resources to complete commercialization of our products, obtain regulatory clearances or approvals; build our marketing, sales, manufacturing and finance capabilities, and conduct further research and development. The further development and commercialization of our products will require substantial development, regulatory, sales and marketing, manufacturing and other expenditures. We have only generated limited revenues from product sales. Our accumulated deficit was approximately $139.6 million at December 31, 2019.

 

We file federal taxes that may be subject to audit and adjustments from time to time.

 

Although we have been experiencing recurring losses, we are obligated to file tax returns for compliance with IRS regulations and that of applicable state jurisdictions. We have filed our 2018 federal and state corporate tax returns. At December 31, 2019 and 2018, we have approximately $75.8 and $77.2 million of net operating losses, respectively. This net operating loss will be eligible to be carried forward for tax purposes at federal and applicable states level, but the use of such net operating losses may be subject to restrictions under applicable tax law. A full valuation allowance has been recorded related to the deferred tax assets generated from the net operating losses.

 

We are currently delinquent with some of our federal payroll and unemployment taxes and applicable state payroll and unemployment tax filings

 

In prior years we have been delinquent in filing our payroll and unemployment taxes. We are currently working with both the IRS and the State of Georgia to establish a payment plan. We have been able to abate some of the penalties associated with the late filings. We will attempt to file on time and to make payments to federal state agencies on time, but we cannot guarantee that we will have adequate funds or the personnel necessary to make these payments and filings.

 

Our ability to sell our products is controlled by government regulations, and we may not be able to obtain any necessary clearances or approvals.

 

The design, manufacturing, labeling, distribution and marketing of medical device products are subject to extensive and rigorous government regulation in most of the markets in which we sell, or plan to sell, our products, which can be expensive and uncertain and can cause lengthy delays before we can begin selling our products in those markets.

 

In foreign countries, including European countries, we are subject to government regulation, which could delay or prevent our ability to sell our products in those jurisdictions.

 

In order for us to market our products in Europe and some other international jurisdictions, we and our distributors and agents must obtain required regulatory registrations or approvals. We must also comply with extensive regulations regarding safety, efficacy and quality in those jurisdictions. We may not be able to obtain the required regulatory registrations or approvals, or we may be required to incur significant costs in obtaining or maintaining any regulatory registrations or approvals we receive. Delays in obtaining any registrations or approvals required for marketing our products, failure to receive these registrations or approvals, or future loss of previously obtained registrations or approvals would limit our ability to sell our products internationally. For example, international regulatory bodies have adopted various regulations governing product standards, packaging requirements, labeling requirements, import restrictions, tariff regulations, duties and tax requirements. These regulations vary from country to country. In order to sell our products in Europe, in 2018 we or our assigns must undergo an inspection and re-file for ISO 13485:2016 and the CE Mark, which is an international symbol of quality and compliance with applicable European medical device directives. Failure to maintain ISO 13485:2016 certification or CE mark certification or other international regulatory approvals would prevent us from selling in some countries in the European Union.

 

In the United States, we are subject to regulation by the U.S. FDA, which could prevent us from selling our products domestically.

 

In order for us to market our products in the United States, we must obtain clearance or approval from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, or U.S. FDA. We cannot be sure that:

 

 

It can take several years from initial filing of a PMA application and require the submission of extensive supporting data and clinical information. The U.S. FDA may impose strict labeling or other requirements as a condition of its clearance or approval, any of which could limit our ability to market our products domestically. Further, if we wish to modify a product after U.S. FDA approval of a PMA application, including changes in indications or other modifications that could affect safety and efficacy, additional clearances or approvals will be required from the U.S. FDA. Any request by the U.S. FDA for additional data, or any requirement by the U.S. FDA that we conduct additional clinical studies, could result in a significant delay in bringing our products to market domestically and require substantial additional research and other expenditures. Similarly, any labeling or other conditions or restrictions imposed by the U.S. FDA could hinder our ability to effectively market our products domestically. Further, there may be new U.S. FDA policies or changes in U.S. FDA policies that could be adverse to us.

 

 

Even if we obtain clearance or approval to sell our products, we are subject to ongoing requirements and inspections that could lead to the restriction, suspension or revocation of our clearance.

 

We, as well as any potential collaborative partners, will be required to adhere to applicable regulations in the markets in which we operate and sell our products, regarding good manufacturing practice, which include testing, control, and documentation requirements. Ongoing compliance with good manufacturing practice and other applicable regulatory requirements will be strictly enforced applicable regulatory agencies. Failure to comply with these regulatory requirements could result in, among other things, warning letters, fines, injunctions, civil penalties, recall or seizure of products, total or partial suspension of production, failure to obtain premarket clearance or premarket approval for devices, withdrawal of approvals previously obtained, and criminal prosecution. The restriction, suspension or revocation of regulatory approvals or any other failure to comply with regulatory requirements would limit our ability to operate and could increase our costs.

 

We depend on a limited number of distributors and any reduction, delay or cancellation of an order from these distributors or the loss of any of these distributors could cause our revenue to decline.

 

Each year we have had one or a few distributors that have accounted for substantially all of our limited revenues. As a result, the termination of a purchase order with any one of these distributors may result in the loss of substantially all of our revenues. We are constantly working to develop new relationships with existing or new distributors, but despite these efforts we may not be successful at generating new orders to maintain similar revenues as current purchase orders are filled. In addition, since a significant portion of our revenues is derived from a relatively few distributors, any financial difficulties experienced by any one of these distributors, or any delay in receiving payments from any one of these distributors, could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.

 

To successfully market and sell our products internationally, we must address many issues with which we have limited experience.

 

All of our sales of LuViva to date have been to distributors outside of the United States. We expect that substantially all of our business will continue to come from sales in foreign markets, through increased penetration in countries where we currently sell LuViva, combined with expansion into new international markets. However, international sales are subject to a number of risks, including:

 

 

If one or more of these risks were realized, it could require us to dedicate significant resources to remedy the situation, and even if we are able to find a solution, our revenues may still decline.

 

To market and sell LuViva internationally, we depend on distributors and they may not be successful.

 

We currently depend almost exclusively on third-party distributors to sell and service LuViva internationally and to train our international distributors, and if these distributors terminate their relationships with us or under-perform, we may be unable to maintain or increase our level of international revenue. We will also need to engage additional international distributors to grow our business and expand the territories in which we sell LuViva. Distributors may not commit the necessary resources to market, sell and service LuViva to the level of our expectations. If current or future distributors do not perform adequately, or if we are unable to engage distributors in particular geographic areas, our revenue from international operations will be adversely affected.

 

The coronavirus outbreak could adversely impact our business.

 

In December 2019, it was first reported that there had been an outbreak of a novel strain of coronavirus, SARS-CoV-2, in China. As the coronavirus continues to spread outside of China, including throughout the United States, we may experience disruptions that could severely impact our business and regulatory filings, including:

 

 

 

The global outbreak of coronavirus continues to rapidly evolve. The extent to which the coronavirus impacts our results will depend on future developments, which are highly uncertain and cannot be predicted, including new information which may emerge concerning the severity of the coronavirus, the ultimate geographic spread of the coronavirus, the duration of the outbreak, travel restrictions imposed by countries we conduct our business, business closures or business disruption in the world, a reduction in time spent out of home and the actions taken throughout the world, including in our markets, to contain the coronavirus or treat its impact. The future impact of the outbreak is highly uncertain and cannot be predicted, and we cannot provide any assurance that the outbreak will not have a material adverse impact on our operations or future results or filings with regulatory health authorities. The extent of the impact to us, if any, will depend on future developments, including actions taken to contain the coronavirus.

 

Risks Related to Our Intellectual Property

 

Our success largely depends on our ability to maintain and protect the proprietary information on which we base our products.

 

Our success depends in large part upon our ability to maintain and protect the proprietary nature of our technology through the patent process, as well as our ability to license from other’s patents and patent applications necessary to develop our products. If any of our patents are successfully challenged, invalidated or circumvented, or our right or ability to manufacture our products was to be limited, our ability to continue to manufacture and market our products could be adversely affected. In addition to patents, we rely on trade secrets and proprietary know-how, which we seek to protect, in part, through confidentiality and proprietary information agreements. The other parties to these agreements may breach these provisions, and we may not have adequate remedies for any breach. Additionally, our trade secrets could otherwise become known to or be independently developed by competitors.

 

As of December 31, 2019, we have been issued, or have rights to, 16 U.S. patents (including those under license). In addition, we have filed for, or have rights to, two U.S. patents (including those under license) that are still pending. We also have three granted patents that apply to our interstitial fluid analysis system as well as seven international patents that apply to our noninvasive technologies. There are additional international patents and pending applications. One or more of the patents we hold directly or license from third parties, including those for our cervical cancer detection products, may be successfully challenged, invalidated or circumvented, or we may otherwise be unable to rely on these patents. These risks are also present for the process we use or will use for manufacturing our products. In addition, our competitors, many of whom have substantial resources and have made substantial investments in competing technologies, may apply for and obtain patents that prevent, limit or interfere with our ability to make, use and sell our products, either in the United States or in international markets.

 

The medical device industry has been characterized by extensive litigation regarding patents and other intellectual property rights. In addition, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, or USPTO, may institute interference proceedings. The defense and prosecution of intellectual property suits, USPTO proceedings and related legal and administrative proceedings are both costly and time consuming. Moreover, we may need to litigate to enforce our patents, to protect our trade secrets or know-how, or to determine the enforceability, scope and validity of the proprietary rights of others. Any litigation or interference proceedings involving us may require us to incur substantial legal and other fees and expenses and may require some of our employees to devote all or a substantial portion of their time to the proceedings. An adverse determination in the proceedings could subject us to significant liabilities to third parties, require us to seek licenses from third parties or prevent us from selling our products in some or all markets. We may not be able to reach a satisfactory settlement of any dispute by licensing necessary patents or other intellectual property. Even if we reached a settlement, the settlement process may be expensive and time consuming, and the terms of the settlement may require us to pay substantial royalties. An adverse determination in a judicial or administrative proceeding or the failure to obtain a necessary license could prevent us from manufacturing and selling our products.

 

We may be unable to commercialize our products if we are unable to protect our proprietary rights, and we may be liable for significant costs and damages if we face a claim of intellectual property infringement by a third party.

 

Our near and long-term prospects depend in part on our ability to obtain and maintain patents, protect trade secrets and operate without infringing upon the proprietary rights of others. In the absence of patent and trade secret protection, competitors may adversely affect our business by independently developing and marketing substantially equivalent or superior products and technology, possibly at lower prices. We could also incur substantial costs in litigation and suffer diversion of attention of technical and management personnel if we are required to defend ourselves in intellectual property infringement suits brought by third parties, with or without merit, or if we are required to initiate litigation against others to protect or assert our intellectual property rights. Moreover, any such litigation may not be resolved in our favor.

 

Although we and our licensors have filed various patent applications covering the uses of our product candidates, patents may not be issued from the patent applications already filed or from applications that we might file in the future. Moreover, the patent position of companies in the pharmaceutical industry generally involves complex legal and factual questions and has been the subject of much litigation. Any patents we own or license, now or in the future, may be challenged, invalidated or circumvented. To date, no consistent policy has been developed in the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (the “PTO”) regarding the breadth of claims allowed in biotechnology patents.

 

 

In addition, because patent applications in the U.S. are maintained in secrecy until patent applications publish or patents issue, and because publication of discoveries in the scientific or patent literature often lags behind actual discoveries, we cannot be certain that we and our licensors are the first creators of inventions covered by any licensed patent applications or patents or that we or they are the first to file. The PTO may commence interference proceedings involving patents or patent applications, in which the question of first inventorship is contested. Accordingly, the patents owned or licensed to us may not be valid or may not afford us protection against competitors with similar technology, and the patent applications licensed to us may not result in the issuance of patents.

 

It is also possible that our owned and licensed technologies may infringe on patents or other rights owned by others, and licenses to which may not be available to us. We may be unable to obtain a license under such patent on terms favorable to us, if at all. We may have to alter our products or processes, pay licensing fees or cease activities altogether because of patent rights of third parties.

 

In addition to the products for which we have patents or have filed patent applications, we rely upon unpatented proprietary technology and may not be able to meaningfully protect our rights with regard to that unpatented proprietary technology. Furthermore, to the extent that consultants, key employees or other third parties apply technological information developed by them or by others to any of our proposed projects, disputes may arise as to the proprietary rights to this information, which may not be resolved in our favor.

 

We may be involved in lawsuits to protect or enforce our patents, which could be expensive and time consuming.

 

The pharmaceutical industry has been characterized by extensive litigation regarding patents and other intellectual property rights, and companies have employed intellectual property litigation to gain a competitive advantage. We may become subject to infringement claims or litigation arising out of patents and pending applications of our competitors, or additional interference proceedings declared by the PTO to determine the priority of inventions. The defense and prosecution of intellectual property suits, PTO proceedings, and related legal and administrative proceedings are costly and time-consuming to pursue, and their outcome is uncertain. Litigation may be necessary to enforce our issued patents, to protect our trade secrets and know-how, or to determine the enforceability, scope, and validity of the proprietary rights of others. An adverse determination in litigation or interference proceedings to which we may become a party could subject us to significant liabilities, require us to obtain licenses from third parties, or restrict or prevent us from selling our products in certain markets. Although patent and intellectual property disputes might be settled through licensing or similar arrangements, the costs associated with such arrangements may be substantial and could include our paying large fixed payments and ongoing royalties. Furthermore, the necessary licenses may not be available on satisfactory terms or at all.

 

Competitors may infringe our patents, and we may file infringement claims to counter infringement or unauthorized use. This can be expensive, particularly for a company of our size, and time-consuming. In addition, in an infringement proceeding, a court may decide that a patent of ours is not valid or is unenforceable or may refuse to stop the other party from using the technology at issue on the grounds that our patents do not cover its technology. An adverse determination of any litigation or defense proceedings could put one or more of our patents at risk of being invalidated or interpreted narrowly.

 

Also, a third party may assert that our patents are invalid and/or unenforceable. There are no unresolved communications, allegations, complaints or threats of litigation related to the possibility that our patents are invalid or unenforceable. Any litigation or claims against us, whether or not merited, may result in substantial costs, place a significant strain on our financial resources, divert the attention of management and harm our reputation. An adverse decision in litigation could result in inadequate protection for our product candidates and/or reduce the value of any license agreements we have with third parties.

 

Interference proceedings brought before the PTO may be necessary to determine priority of invention with respect to our patents or patent applications. During an interference proceeding, it may be determined that we do not have priority of invention for one or more aspects in our patents or patent applications and could result in the invalidation in part or whole of a patent or could put a patent application at risk of not issuing. Even if successful, an interference proceeding may result in substantial costs and distraction to our management.

 

Furthermore, because of the substantial amount of discovery required in connection with intellectual property litigation or interference proceedings, there is a risk that some of our confidential information could be compromised by disclosure. In addition, there could be public announcements of the results of hearings, motions or other interim proceedings or developments. If investors perceive these results to be negative, the price of our common stock could be adversely affected.

 

If we infringe the rights of third parties, we could be prevented from selling products, forced to pay damages, and defend against litigation.

 

If our products, methods, processes and other technologies infringe the proprietary rights of other parties, we could incur substantial costs and we may have to: obtain licenses, which may not be available on commercially reasonable terms, if at all; abandon an infringing product candidate; redesign our products or processes to avoid infringement; stop using the subject matter claimed in the patents held by others; pay damages; and/or defend litigation or administrative proceedings which may be costly whether we win or lose, and which could result in a substantial diversion of our financial and management resources. 

 

 

Risks Related to Our Sales Strategy

 

We may not be able to generate sufficient sales revenues to sustain our growth and strategy plans.

 

Our cervical cancer diagnostic activities have been financed to date through a combination of government grants, strategic partners and direct investment. Growing revenues for this product are the main focus of our business. In order to effectively market the cervical cancer detection product, additional capital will be needed.

 

Additional product lines involve the modification of the cervical cancer detection technology for use in other cancers. These product lines are only in the earliest stages of research and development and are currently not projected to reach market for several years. Our goal is to receive enough funding from government grants and contracts, as well as payments from strategic partners, to fund development of these product lines without diverting funds or other necessary resources from the cervical cancer program.

 

Because our products, which use different technology or apply technology in different ways than other medical devices, are or will be new to the market, we may not be successful in launching our products and our operations and growth would be adversely affected.

 

Our products are based on new methods of cancer detection. If our products do not achieve significant market acceptance, our sales will be limited and our financial condition may suffer. Physicians and individuals may not recommend or use our products unless they determine that these products are an attractive alternative to current tests that have a long history of safe and effective use. To date, our products have been used by only a limited number of people, and few independent studies regarding our products have been published. The lack of independent studies limits the ability of doctors or consumers to compare our products to conventional products.

 

If we are unable to compete effectively in the highly competitive medical device industry, our future growth and operating results will suffer.

 

The medical device industry in general and the markets in which we expect to offer products in particular, are intensely competitive. Many of our competitors have substantially greater financial, research, technical, manufacturing, marketing and distribution resources than we do and have greater name recognition and lengthier operating histories in the health care industry. We may not be able to effectively compete against these and other competitors. A number of competitors are currently marketing traditional laboratory-based tests for cervical cancer screening and diagnosis. These tests are widely accepted in the health care industry and have a long history of accurate and effective use. Further, if our products are not available at competitive prices, health care administrators who are subject to increasing pressures to reduce costs may not elect to purchase them. Also, a number of companies have announced that they are developing, or have introduced, products that permit non-invasive and less invasive cancer detection. Accordingly, competition in this area is expected to increase.

 

Furthermore, our competitors may succeed in developing, either before or after the development and commercialization of our products, devices and technologies that permit more efficient, less expensive non-invasive and less invasive cancer detection. It is also possible that one or more pharmaceutical or other health care companies will develop therapeutic drugs, treatments or other products that will substantially reduce the prevalence of cancers or otherwise render our products obsolete.

 

We have limited manufacturing experience, which could limit our growth.

 

We do not have manufacturing experience that would enable us to make products in the volumes that would be necessary for us to achieve significant commercial sales, and we rely upon our suppliers. In addition, we may not be able to establish and maintain reliable, efficient, full scale manufacturing at commercially reasonable costs in a timely fashion. Difficulties we encounter in manufacturing scale-up, or our failure to implement and maintain our manufacturing facilities in accordance with good manufacturing practice regulations, international quality standards or other regulatory requirements, could result in a delay or termination of production. In the past, we have had substantial difficulties in establishing and maintaining manufacturing for our products and those difficulties impacted our ability to increase sales. Companies often encounter difficulties in scaling up production, including problems involving production yield, quality control and assurance, and shortages of qualified personnel.

 

Since we rely on sole source suppliers for several of the components used in our products, any failure of those suppliers to perform would hurt our operations.

 

Several of the components used in our products or planned products, are available from only one supplier, and substitutes for these components could not be obtained easily or would require substantial modifications to our products. Any significant problem experienced by one of our sole source suppliers may result in a delay or interruption in the supply of components to us until that supplier cures the problem or an alternative source of the component is located and qualified. Any delay or interruption would likely lead to a delay or interruption in our manufacturing operations. For our products that require premarket approval, the inclusion of substitute components could require us to qualify the new supplier with the appropriate government regulatory authorities. Alternatively, for our products that qualify for premarket notification, the substitute components must meet our product specifications.

 

 

Because we operate in an industry with significant product liability risk, and we have not specifically insured against this risk, we may be subject to substantial claims against our products.

 

The development, manufacture and sale of medical products entail significant risks of product liability claims. We currently have no product liability insurance coverage beyond that provided by our general liability insurance. Accordingly, we may not be adequately protected from any liabilities, including any adverse judgments or settlements, we might incur in connection with the development, clinical testing, manufacture and sale of our products. A successful product liability claim, or series of claims brought against us that result in an adverse judgment against or settlement by us in excess of any insurance coverage could seriously harm our financial condition or reputation. In addition, product liability insurance is expensive and may not be available to us on acceptable terms, if at all.

 

The availability of third party reimbursement for our products is uncertain, which may limit consumer use and the market for our products.

 

In the United States and elsewhere, sales of medical products are dependent, in part, on the ability of consumers of these products to obtain reimbursement for all or a portion of their cost from third-party payors, such as government and private insurance plans. Any inability of patients, hospitals, physicians and other users of our products to obtain sufficient reimbursement from third-party payors for our products, or adverse changes in relevant governmental policies or the policies of private third-party payors regarding reimbursement for these products, could limit our ability to sell our products on a competitive basis. We are unable to predict what changes will be made in the reimbursement methods used by third-party health care payors. Moreover, third-party payors are increasingly challenging the prices charged for medical products and services, and some health care providers are gradually adopting a managed care system in which the providers contract to provide comprehensive health care services for a fixed cost per person. Patients, hospitals and physicians may not be able to justify the use of our products by the attendant cost savings and clinical benefits that we believe will be derived from the use of our products, and therefore may not be able to obtain third-party reimbursement.

 

Reimbursement and health care payment systems in international markets vary significantly by country and include both government-sponsored health care and private insurance. We may not be able to obtain approvals for reimbursement from these international third-party payors in a timely manner, if at all. Any failure to receive international reimbursement approvals could have an adverse effect on market acceptance of our products in the international markets in which approvals are sought.

 

We have a substantial amount of indebtedness, which may adversely affect our cash flow and our ability to operate our business.

 

Our outstanding indebtedness, which is considered ordinary course payables and accrued payroll liabilities, was $4.2 million at December 31, 2019.

 

The terms of our indebtedness could have negative consequences to us, such as:

 

 

Our ability to meet our expenses and debt obligations will depend on our future performance, which will be affected by financial, business, economic, regulatory and other factors. We will be unable to control many of these factors, such as economic conditions. We cannot be certain that our earnings will be sufficient to allow us to pay the principal and interest on our debt and meet any other obligations. If we do not have enough money to service our debt, we may be required, but unable, to refinance all or part of our existing debt, sell assets, borrow money or raise equity on terms acceptable to us, if at all.

 

We have outstanding debt that is collateralized by a general security interest in all of our assets, including our intellectual property. If we were to fail to repay the debt when due, the holders would have the right to foreclose on these assets.

 

At April 7, 2020, we had notes outstanding that are collateralized by a security interest in our current and future inventory and accounts receivable. We also had a note outstanding that is collateralized by a security interest in all of our assets, including our intellectual property. When the debt is repaid, the holders’ security interests on our assets will be extinguished. However, if an event of default occurs under the notes prior to their repayment, the holders may exercise their rights to foreclose on these secured assets for the payment of these obligations. Under “cross-default” provisions in each of the notes, an event of default under one note is automatically an event of default under the other notes. Any such default and resulting foreclosure would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

 

 

We are subject to restrictive covenants under the terms of our outstanding secured debt. If we were to default under the terms of these covenants, the holders would have the right to foreclose on the assets that secure the debt.

 

The instruments governing our outstanding secured debt contain restrictive covenants. For example, our senior secured convertible note prohibits us from incurring additional indebtedness for borrowed money, repurchasing any outstanding shares of our common stock, or paying any dividends on our capital stock, in each case without the note holder's prior written consent, If we were to breach any of these covenants, the holder could declare an event of default on the note, and exercise its rights to foreclose on the assets securing the note.

 

Our success depends on our ability to attract and retain scientific, technical, managerial and finance personnel.

 

Our ability to operate successfully and manage our future growth depends in significant part upon the continued service of key scientific, technical, managerial and finance personnel, as well as our ability to attract and retain additional highly qualified personnel in these fields. We may not be able to attract and retain key employees when necessary, which would limit our operations and growth. In addition, if we are able to successfully develop and commercialize our products, we will need to hire additional scientific, technical, marketing, managerial and finance personnel. We face intense competition for qualified personnel in these areas, many of whom are often subject to competing employment offers.

 

Certain provisions of our certificate of incorporation that authorize the issuance of additional shares of preferred stock may make it more difficult for a third party to effect a change in control.

 

Our certificate of incorporation authorizes our board of directors to issue up to 5.0 million shares of preferred stock. Our undesignated shares of preferred stock may be issued in one or more series, the terms of which may be determined by the board without further stockholder action. These terms may include, among other terms, voting rights, including the right to vote as a series on particular matters, preferences as to liquidation and dividends, repurchase rights, conversion rights, redemption rights and sinking fund provisions. The issuance of any preferred stock could diminish the rights of holders of our common stock, and therefore could reduce the value of our common stock. In addition, specific rights granted to future holders of preferred stock could be used to restrict our ability to merge with or sell assets to a third party. The ability of our board to issue preferred stock could make it more difficult, delay, discourage, prevent or make it more costly to acquire or effect a change in control, which in turn could prevent our stockholders from recognizing a gain in the event that a favorable offer is extended and could materially and negatively affect the market price of our common stock.

 

Risks Related to Our Common Stock

 

On March 29, 2019, a 1:800 reverse stock split of all of our issued and outstanding common stock was implemented. There are risks associated with a reverse stock split.

 

On March 29, 2019, a 1:800 reverse stock split of all of our issued and outstanding common stock was implemented. As a result of the reverse stock split, every 800 shares of issued and outstanding common stock were converted into 1 share of common stock. All fractional shares created by the reverse stock split were rounded to the nearest whole share. The number of authorized shares of common stock did not change.

 

There are certain risks associated with the reverse stock split, including the following:

 

 

The reverse stock split may decrease the liquidity of the shares of our common stock.

 

The liquidity of the shares of our common stock may be affected adversely by the reverse stock split given the reduced number of shares that were outstanding immediately following the reverse stock split, especially if the market price of our common stock does not increase as a result of the reverse stock split. In addition, the reverse stock split may have increased the number of stockholders who own odd lots of our common stock, creating the potential for such stockholders to experience an increase in the cost of selling their shares and greater difficulty effecting such sales.

 

 

 

Following the reverse stock split, the resulting market price of our common stock may not attract new investors, including institutional investors, and may not satisfy the investing requirements of those investors. Consequently, the trading liquidity of our common stock may not improve.

 

Although we believe that a higher market price of our common stock may help generate greater or broader investor interest, there can be no assurance that the reverse stock split will result in a share price that will attract new investors, including institutional investors. In addition, there can be no assurance that the market price of our common stock will satisfy the investing requirements of those investors. As a result, the trading liquidity of our common stock may not necessarily improve.

 

The number of shares of our common stock issuable upon the conversion of our outstanding convertible debt and preferred stock or exercise of outstanding warrants and options is substantial.

 

As of April 14, 2020, our outstanding convertible debt was convertible into an aggregate of 108,900,837 shares of our common stock, and the outstanding shares of our Series C, Series C1 and Series C2 preferred stock were convertible into an aggregate of 9,267,770 shares of common stock. Also, as of that date we had warrants outstanding that were exercisable for an aggregate of 66,615,856 shares, contractual obligations to issue 2,132 shares, and outstanding options to purchase 50 shares. The shares of common stock issuable upon conversion or exercise of these securities would have constituted approximately 97.0% of the total number of shares of common stock then issued and outstanding. However, please refer to Footnote 11 - CONVERTIBLE DEBT IN DEFAULT in the paragraph: Debt Restructuring for more information regarding our warrants.

 

Further, under the terms of our convertible debt and preferred stock, as well as certain of our outstanding warrants, the conversion price or exercise price, as the case may be, could be adjusted downward, causing substantial dilution. See “—Adjustments to the conversion price for our convertible debt and preferred stock, and the exercise price for certain of our warrants, will dilute the ownership interests of our existing stockholders.”

 

Adjustments to the conversion price of our convertible debt and preferred stock, and the exercise price for certain of our warrants, will dilute the ownership interests of our existing stockholders.

 

Under the terms of a portion of our convertible debt, the conversion price fluctuates with the market price of our common stock. Additionally, under the terms of our Series C preferred stock, any dividends we choose to pay in shares of our common stock will be calculated based on the then-current market price of our common stock. Accordingly, if the market price of our common stock decreases, the number of shares of our common stock issuable upon conversion of the convertible debt or upon payment of dividends on our outstanding Series C preferred stock will increase, and may result in the issuance of a significant number of additional shares of our common stock.

 

Under the terms of our preferred stock and certain of our convertible notes and outstanding warrants, the conversion price or exercise price will be lowered if we issue common stock at a per share price below the then-conversion price or then-exercise price for those securities. Reductions in the conversion price or exercise price would result in the issuance of a significant number of additional shares of our common stock upon conversion or exercise, which would result in dilution in the value of the shares of our outstanding common stock and the voting power represented thereby.

 

Our stock is thinly traded, so you may be unable to sell at or near ask prices or at all.

 

The shares of our common stock are only quoted in the OTC pink sheet marketplace. Shares of our common stock are thinly traded, meaning that the number of persons interested in purchasing our common shares at or near ask prices at any given time may be relatively small or non-existent. This situation is attributable to a number of factors, including:

 

 

As a consequence, our stock price may not reflect an actual or perceived value. Also, there may be periods of several days or more when trading activity in our shares is minimal or non-existent, as compared to a seasoned issuer that has a large and steady volume of trading activity that will generally support continuous sales without an adverse effect on share price. A broader or more active public trading market for our common shares may not develop or if developed, may not be sustained. Due to these conditions, you may not be able to sell your shares at or near ask prices or at all if you need money or otherwise desire to liquidate your shares.

 

 

Trading in our common stock is subject to special sales practices and may be difficult to sell.

 

Our common stock is subject to the Securities and Exchange Commission’s “penny stock” rule, which imposes special sales practice requirements upon broker-dealers who sell such securities to persons other than established distributors or accredited investors. Penny stocks are generally defined to be an equity security that has a market price of less than $5.00 per share. For transactions covered by the rule, the broker-dealer must make a special suitability determination for the purchaser and receive the purchaser’s written agreement to the transaction prior to the sale. Consequently, the rule may affect the ability of broker-dealers to sell our securities and also may affect the ability of our stockholders to sell their securities in any market that might develop.

 

Stockholders should be aware that, according to Securities and Exchange Commission, the market for penny stocks has suffered from patterns of fraud and abuse. Such patterns include:

 

 

Our management is aware of the abuses that have occurred historically in the penny stock market. Although we do not expect to be in a position to dictate the behavior of the market or of broker-dealers who participate in the market, management will strive within the confines of practical limitations to prevent the described patterns from being established with respect to our common stock.

 

Our need to raise additional capital in the near future or to use our equity securities for payments could have a dilutive effect on your investment.

 

In order to continue operations, we will need to raise additional capital. We may attempt to raise capital through the public or private sale of our common stock or securities convertible into or exercisable for our common stock. In addition, from time to time we have issued our common stock or warrants in lieu of cash payments. If we sell additional shares of our common stock or other equity securities or issue such securities in respect of other claims or indebtedness, such sales or issuances will further dilute the percentage of our equity that you own. Depending upon the price per share of securities that we sell or issue in the future, if any, your interest in us could be further diluted by any adjustments to the number of shares and the applicable exercise price required pursuant to the terms of the agreements under which we previously issued convertible securities.

 

 

FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS

 

Statements in this report, which express “belief,” “anticipation” or “expectation,” as well as other statements that are not historical facts, are forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, or Securities Act, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or Exchange Act. These forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from historical results or anticipated results, including those identified in the foregoing “Risk Factors” and elsewhere in this report. Examples of these uncertainties and risks include, but are not limited to:

 

 

Forward-looking statements should not be read as a guarantee of future performance or results and will not necessarily be accurate indications of the times at, or by which, such performance or results will be achieved. Forward-looking information is based on information available at the time and/or management’s good faith belief with respect to future events and is subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual performance or results to differ materially from those expressed in the statements.

 

Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date the statements are made. We assume no obligation to update forward-looking statements to reflect actual results, changes in assumptions or changes in other factors affecting forward-looking information except to the extent required by applicable securities laws. If we update one or more forward-looking statements, no inference should be drawn that we will make additional updates with respect thereto or with respect to other forward-looking statements.

 

Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments

 

Not applicable.

 

Item 2. Properties

 

Our corporate offices, which also comprise our administrative, research and development, marketing and production facilities, are located at 5835 Peachtree Corners East, Suite B, Norcross, Georgia 30092, where we lease approximately 12,800 square feet under a lease that expires in March 2021.

 

Item 3. Legal Proceedings

 

We are subject to claims and legal actions that arise in the ordinary course of business. However, we are not currently subject to any claims or actions that we believe would have a material adverse effect on our financial position or results of operations.

 

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures

 

Not applicable.

 

 

PART II

 

Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

 

Market for Common Stock; Holders

 

Our common stock is dually listed on the OTC pink sheets under the ticker symbol “GTHP.” The number of record holders of our common stock at April 7, 2020 was 215.

 

A 1:800 reverse stock split of all of our issued and outstanding common stock was implemented on March 29, 2019. As a result of the reverse stock split, every 800 shares of issued and outstanding common stock were converted into 1 share of common stock. All fractional shares created by the reverse stock split were rounded to the nearest whole share. The number of authorized shares of common stock did not change.

 

The high and low common stock share prices for the first and second quarter of 2020 and calendar years 2019 and 2018, as reported by the OTCBB, are as set forth in the following table. All share prices set forth in the table have been retroactively adjusted to reflect the reverse stock split (as discussed above) for all periods presented.

 

	2020		2019		2018
	High	Low	High	Low	High	Low
First Quarter	$0.23	$0.11	$1.45	$0.02	$26.00	$4.48
Second Quarter*	$0.16	$0.10	$0.26	$0.10	$12.80	$2.40
Third Quarter			$0.25	$0.16	$3.20	$0.64
Fourth Quarter			$0.24	$0.10	$3.04	$0.08

* Through April 14, 2020.

 

Dividend Policy

 

We have not paid any dividends on our common stock since our inception and do not intend to pay any dividends in the foreseeable future.

 

Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans

 

All the securities we have provided our employees, directors and consultants have been issued under our stock option plans, which are approved by our stockholders. We have issued common stock to other individuals that are not employees or directors, in lieu of cash payments, that are not part of any plan approved by our stockholders.

 

Securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans as of December 31, 2019:

 

Plan category	Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights	Weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights	Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column(a))
	(a)	(b)	( c )
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders	47	$58,083	-
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders	-	-	-
TOTAL	47	$58,083	-

 

Item 6. Selected Financial Data

 

Not applicable.

 

 

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

 

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our financial statements and notes thereto included elsewhere in this report.

 

Overview

 

We are a medical technology company focused on developing innovative medical devices that have the potential to improve healthcare. Our primary focus is the sales and marketing of our LuViva® Advanced Cervical Scan non-invasive cervical cancer detection device. The underlying technology of LuViva primarily relates to the use of biophotonics for the non-invasive detection of cancers. LuViva is designed to identify cervical cancers and precancers painlessly, non-invasively and at the point of care by scanning the cervix with light, then analyzing the reflected and fluorescent light.

 

LuViva provides a less invasive and painless alternative to conventional tests for cervical cancer screening and detection. Additionally, LuViva improves patient well-being not only because it eliminates pain, but also because it is convenient to use and provides rapid results at the point of care. We focus on two primary applications for LuViva: first, as a cancer screening tool in the developing world, where infrastructure to support traditional cancer-screening methods is limited or non-existent, and second, as a triage following traditional screening in the developed world, where a high number of false positive results cause a high rate of unnecessary and ultimately costly follow-up tests.

 

We are a Delaware corporation, originally incorporated in 1992 under the name “SpectRx, Inc.,” and, on February 22, 2008, changed our name to Guided Therapeutics, Inc. At the same time, we renamed our wholly owned subsidiary, InterScan, which originally had been incorporated as “Guided Therapeutics.”

 

Since our inception, we have raised capital through the public and private sale of debt and equity, funding from collaborative arrangements, and grants.

 

Our prospects must be considered in light of the substantial risks, expenses and difficulties encountered by entrants into the medical device industry. This industry is characterized by an increasing number of participants, intense competition and a high failure rate. We have experienced operating losses since our inception and, as of December 31, 2019 we have an accumulated deficit of approximately $139.6 million. To date, we have engaged primarily in research and development efforts and the early stages of marketing our products. We do not have significant experience in manufacturing, marketing or selling our products. We may not be successful in growing sales for our products. Moreover, required regulatory clearances or approvals may not be obtained in a timely manner, or at all. Our products may not ever gain market acceptance and we may not ever generate significant revenues or achieve profitability. The development and commercialization of our products requires substantial development, regulatory, sales and marketing, manufacturing and other expenditures. We expect our operating losses to continue for the foreseeable future as we continue to expend substantial resources to complete commercialization of our products, obtain regulatory clearances or approvals, build our marketing, sales, manufacturing and finance capabilities, and conduct further research and development.

 

Our product revenues to date have been limited. In 2019, the majority of our revenues were from the sale of LuViva devices and disposables. We expect that the majority of our revenue in 2020 will be derived from revenue from the sale of LuViva devices and disposables.

 

Current Demand for LuViva

Based on discussions with our distributors, we expect to generate purchase orders for approximately $1.0 to $2.0 million in LuViva devices and disposables in 2020 and expect those purchase orders to result in actual sales of $0.5 to $1.0 million in 2020, representing what we view as current demand for our products. We cannot be assured that we will generate all or any of these additional purchase orders, or that existing orders will not be canceled by the distributors or that parts to build product will be available to meet demand, such that existing orders will result in actual sales. Because we have a short history of sales of our products, we cannot confidently predict future sales of our products beyond this time frame and cannot be assured of any particular amount of sales. Accordingly, we have not identified any particular trends with regard to sales of our products.

 

Recent Developments

On December 18, 2018, we entered into a co-development agreement with Newmars Technologies, Inc. (“NTI”), whereby NTI will perform final assembly of the LuViva device for its contracted distribution countries in Eastern Europe and Russia at its ISO 13485 facility in Hungary. The agreement enables Newmars to manufacture LuViva® Advance Cervical Scan devices in Hungary for distribution in the nine Central and Eastern European countries for which Newmars has distribution rights. Guided Therapeutics will manufacture sub-assemblies and sell these and other parts to Newmars and will receive an additional $2,000 royalty for each device sold in those countries, which include Russia, Ukraine, Poland, Romania, Hungary, Moldova, Kazakhstan, Belarus and Armenia, subject to certain minimum royalty payments and parts orders. The additional carve out for these territories has been agreed to by SMI. The Agreement with Newmars does not allow them to manufacture single use Cervical Guides, which the Company will continue to supply.

 

 

We received Regulatory Approval from the Indian Ministry of Health & Family Welfare to allow commercialization of the LuViva device and disposables. The Ministry concluded that the LuViva device is “Non Invasive” and as such is “not regulated under the Drugs and Cosmetics Act 1940 and Medical Device Rules 2017 thereunder.” As a result, LuViva can now be commercialized in India.

 

On August 31, 2018, we entered into agreements with certain holders of the our Series C1 preferred stock, par value $0.001 per share (the “Series C1 Preferred Stock”), including John Imhoff, the chairman of our board of directors, and Mark Faupel, the Chief Operating Officer and a director of our company (the “Exchange Agreements”), pursuant to which those holders separately agreed to exchange each share of the Series C1 Preferred Stock held for one (1) share of our newly created Series C2 preferred stock, par value $0.001 per share (the “Series C2 Preferred Stock”). In total, for 3,262 shares of Series C1 Preferred Stock to be surrendered, we issued 3,262 shares of Series C2 Preferred Stock.

 

On October 19, 2018, we held our 2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “Annual Meeting”). As described in the our Definitive Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A, as amended, originally filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 11, 2018, at the Annual Meeting, stockholders voted and approved the following proposals: (1) the election of the director-nominees (the “Directors”) of our board of directors (the “Board”), with the five Directors receiving the highest number of affirmative votes cast by holders of shares of common stock and holders of Series C2 Preferred Stock, voting as a single class; (2) the ratification of the appointment of UHY LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm by a majority of the votes cast by the holders of common stock and of Series C2 Preferred Stock, voting as a single class; (3) an amendment to the Restated Certificate of Incorporation, as amended (the “Certificate of Incorporation”), to enable a potential reverse split of the issued and outstanding shares of common stock at a ratio of between 1-for-25 and 1-for-800, with such ratio to be determined at the sole discretion of the Board and with such reverse split to be effected at such time and date on or before March 31, 2019, if at all, as determined by the Board in its sole discretion (the “Reverse Split Amendment”) by a majority of the issued and outstanding common stock and Series C2 Preferred Stock voting as a single class; (4) the adoption of an amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation, to, among other things, increase our authorized common stock from 1,000,000,000 shares to 3,000,000,000 shares; and (5) the adoption of our 2018 Stock Option Plan and the material terms thereunder (the “Plan”) by a majority of the votes cast by the holders of common stock and of Series C2 Preferred Stock, voting as a single class.

 

On November 7, 2018, we increased the number of common stock shares authorized from one billion to three billion.

 

A 1:800 reverse stock split of all of our issued and outstanding common stock was implemented on March 29, 2019. As a result of the reverse stock split, every 800 shares of issued and outstanding common stock were converted into 1 share of common stock. All fractional shares created by the reverse stock split were rounded to the nearest whole share. The number of authorized shares of common stock did not change.

 

Critical Accounting Policies

 

Our material accounting policies, which we believe are the most critical to investors understanding of our financial results and condition, are discussed below. Because we are still early in our enterprise development, the number of these policies requiring explanation is limited. As we begin to generate increased revenue from different sources, we expect that the number of applicable policies and complexity of the judgments required will increase.

 

Revenue Recognition: ASC 606 Revenue from Contracts with Customers establishes a single and comprehensive framework which sets out how much revenue is to be recognized, and when. The core principle is that a vendor should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the vendor expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. Revenue will now be recognized by a vendor when control over the goods or services is transferred to the customer. In contrast, Revenue based revenue recognition around an analysis of the transfer of risks and rewards; this now forms one of a number of criteria that are assessed in determining whether control has been transferred. The application of the core principle in ASC 606 is carried out in five steps: Step 1 – Identify the contract with a customer: a contract is defined as an agreement (including oral and implied), between two or more parties, that creates enforceable rights and obligations and sets out the criteria for each of those rights and obligations. The contract needs to have commercial substance and it is probable that the entity will collect the consideration to which it will be entitled. Step 2 – Identify the performance obligations in the contract: a performance obligation in a contract is a promise (including implicit) to transfer a good or service to the customer. Each performance obligation should be capable of being distinct and is separately identifiable in the contract. Step 3 – Determine the transaction price: transaction price is the amount of consideration that the entity can be entitled to, in exchange for transferring the promised goods and services to a customer, excluding amounts collected on behalf of third parties. Step 4 – Allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract: for a contract that has more than one performance obligation, the entity will allocate the transaction price to each performance obligation separately, in exchange for satisfying each performance obligation. The acceptable methods of allocating the transaction price include adjusted market assessment approach, expected cost plus a margin approach, and, the residual approach in limited circumstances. Discounts given should be allocated proportionately to all performance obligations unless certain criteria are met and reallocation of changes in standalone selling prices after inception is not permitted. Step 5 – Recognize revenue as and when the entity satisfies a performance obligation: the entity should recognize revenue at a point in time, except if it meets any of the three criteria, which will require recognition of revenue over time: the entity’s performance creates or enhances an asset controlled by the customer, the customer simultaneously receives and consumes the benefit of the entity’s performance as the entity performs, and the entity does not create an asset that has an alternative use to the entity and the entity has the right to be paid for performance to date.

 

 

Valuation of Deferred Taxes: We account for income taxes in accordance with the liability method. Under the liability method, we recognize deferred assets and liabilities based upon anticipated future tax consequences attributable to differences between financial statement carrying amounts of assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. We establish a valuation allowance to the extent that it is more likely than not that deferred tax assets will not be utilized against future taxable income.

 

Valuation of Equity Instruments Granted to Employee, Service Providers and Investors: On the date of issuance, the instruments are recorded at their fair value as determined using either the Black-Scholes valuation model or Monte Carlo Simulation model.

 

Beneficial Conversion Features of Convertible Securities: Conversion options that are not bifurcated as a derivative pursuant to ASC 815 and not accounted for as a separate equity component under the cash conversion guidance are evaluated to determine whether they are beneficial to the investor at inception (a beneficial conversion feature) or may become beneficial in the future due to potential adjustments. The beneficial conversion feature guidance in ASC 470-20 applies to convertible stock as well as convertible debt which are outside the scope of ASC 815. A beneficial conversion feature is defined as a nondetachable conversion feature that is in the money at the commitment date. The beneficial conversion feature guidance requires recognition of the conversion option’s in-the-money portion, the intrinsic value of the option, in equity, with an offsetting reduction to the carrying amount of the instrument. The resulting discount is amortized as a dividend over either the life of the instrument, if a stated maturity date exists, or to the earliest conversion date, if there is no stated maturity date. If the earliest conversion date is immediately upon issuance, the dividend must be recognized at inception. When there is a subsequent change to the conversion ratio based on a future occurrence, the new conversion price may trigger the recognition of an additional beneficial conversion feature on occurrence.

 

Allowance for Accounts Receivable: We estimate losses from the inability of our distributors to make required payments and periodically review the payment history of each of our distributors, as well as their financial condition, and revise our reserves as a result.

 

Inventory Valuation: All inventories are stated at lower of cost or net realizable value, with cost determined substantially on a “first-in, first-out” basis. Selling, general, and administrative expenses are not inventoried, but are charged to expense when purchased.

 

Reverse Stock Split: On March 29, 2019, the Company implemented a 1:800 reverse stock split of all of our issued and outstanding common stock. As a result of the reverse stock split, every 800 shares of issued and outstanding common stock were converted into 1 share of common stock. All fractional shares created by the reverse stock split were rounded to the nearest whole share. The number of authorized shares of common stock did not change. The reverse stock split decreased the Company’s issued and outstanding shares of common stock from 2,135,478,405 shares of Common Stock to 2,669,348 shares as of that date.

 

Results of Operations

 

Comparison of 2019 and 2018

 

Sales Revenue, Cost of Sales and Gross Loss from Devices and Disposables: Revenues from the sale of LuViva devices for 2019 and 2018 were approximately $36,000 and $57,000, respectively. Revenues in 2019 were approximately, $21,000 or 37% lower when compared to the same period in 2018, due to lack of funding to support sales and marketing efforts. Related costs of sales were approximately $70,000 and $89,000 in 2019 and 2018, respectively. Costs of sales in 2019, were approximately, $19,000 or 21% lower when compared to the same period in 2018, due to lower sales and cost of sales in the same period. This resulted in a gross loss of approximately $34,000 on the sales of devices and disposables for 2019 compared with a gross loss of approximately $32,000 for the same period in 2018.

 

Research and Development Expenses: Research and development expenses for 2019, decreased to approximately $122,000, from approximately $244,000 in 2018. The decrease of $122,000, or 50%, was primarily due to cost reduction plans in research and development payroll expenses.

 

Sales and Marketing Expenses: Sales and marketing expenses for 2019, decreased to approximately $87,000, compared to $195,000 in 2018. The decrease, of approximately $108,000, or 55% was primarily due to Company-wide expense reduction and cost savings efforts.

 

 

 

General and Administrative Expense: General and administrative expenses for 2019, decreased to approximately $694,000, compared to $1,077,000 for the same period in 2018. The decrease of approximately $383,000, or 36%, was primarily related to lower compensation and option expenses incurred during the same period. For 2019, general and administrative expenses consisted primarily of professional fees, insurance, and paid and accrued compensation costs.

 

Other Income: Other income was approximately $48,000 in 2019, compared to $54,000 in the same period in 2018, a decrease of $6,000 or 11%. Other income consists of refunds from prior years for insurance policies.

 

Interest Expense: Interest expense for 2019 decreased to approximately $1,412,000, compared to $1,763,000 for the same period in 2018. The decrease of approximately $351,000, or 20%, was primarily related to a decrease in the amortization expense of and interest recorded for the value of the beneficial conversion feature on convertible debt outstanding and amortization of debt issuance costs.

 

Fair Value of Warrants Recovery and Expense: Fair value of warrants recovery for 2019, decreased to approximately $380,000 compared to $3,234,000 for the same period in 2018. The decrease of approximately $2,854,000, or 88% was primarily due to the less favorable significant changes in warrant conversion prices and decrease in stock price, in the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019.

 

Gain from extinguishment of debt: Gain from the restructuring and exchange of debt due to officers for 2019, decreased to approximately nil compared to $1,039,000 for the same period in 2018. The decrease of approximately $1,039,000 or 100% was primarily due to having no exchanges of debt for equity in 2019 than in the same period in 2018.

 

Net loss / profit: Net loss attributable to common stockholders increased to approximately $1,921,000, or $0.58 per share, in 2019, from a net profit of $900,000, or $1.95 per share, in 2018. The increase in the net loss of $2,821,000, or 313% was for reasons outlined above. As stated previously, our net loss for the year ended December 31, 2019 was primarily realized due $1.4 million, of amortization expense of and interest recorded for the value of the beneficial conversion feature on convertible debt outstanding and amortization of debt issuance costs and the other items as described above. Our net profit for the year ended December 31, 2018 was primarily realized due to a $3.2 million gain in the fair value of warrants recorded in 2018 and a $1.0 million gain from extinguishment of debt.

 

There was no income tax benefit recorded for 2019 or 2018, due to recurring net operating losses.

 

Liquidity and Capital Resources

 

Since our inception, we have raised capital through the public and private sale of debt and equity, funding from collaborative arrangements, and grants. At December 31, 2019, we had cash of approximately $899,000 and a negative working capital of approximately $11,381,000.

 

Our major cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2019 consisted of cash out-flows of $0.8 million from operations, including approximately $1.9 million of net loss, and a net change from financing activities of $1.7 million, which primarily represented the proceeds received from future issuance of common stock and warrants, and proceeds from debt financing. Our net loss for the year ended December 31, 2019 was primarily realized due to $1.4 million, of interest expense and of amortization expense of and interest recorded for the value of the beneficial conversion feature on convertible debt outstanding and amortization of debt issuance costs.

 

Capital resources for 2020

 

On January 6, 2020, we entered into an exchange agreement with Jones Day. We will exchange $1,744,768 of debt outstanding for: $175,000, an unsecured promissory note in the amount of $550,000; due 13 months form the date of issuance, that may be called at any time prior to maturity upon a payment of $150,000; and an unsecured promissory note in the principal amount of $444,768, bearing an annualized interest rate of 6.0% and due in four equal annual installments beginning on the second anniversary of the date of issuance.

 

On January 16, 2020, we entered into an exchange agreement with GPB. This exchange agreement which has not been completed will call for the exchange of $3,360,811 of debt outstanding as of December 12, 2019 for: cash of $1,500,000; 1,860,811 common stock shares; 7,185,000 warrants to purchase common stock shares at a strike price of $0.20 for the 2016 warrants issued; 1,860,811 warrants to purchase common stock shares at a strike price of $0.25; 3,721,622 warrants to purchase common stock shares at a strike price of $0.75; and 2,791 series D preferred stock shares (each Series D preferred stock share converts into 3,000 shares of the Company’s common stock shares). If we are able to raise capital in excess of $4,000,000, the exchange amounts shall be adjusted. If the financing is between $4,000,000 and $4,900,000, for every $100,000 raised in excess of $4,000,000 we will pay an additional $50,000 to pay down debt. If between $5,000,000 and $6,000,000 is raised thru financings, we will pay an additional $1,000,000 to pay down debt. If the financing is in excess of $6,000,000 then we will pay the entire debt balance outstanding. In the event of alternative financings, we may elect to pay GPB a total of $1,500,000 in cash to GPB at which time GPB shall waive any security interest in our assets, and GPB shall exchange any remaining debt from the notes into the Series D unit offering. GPB shall have the right to convert the outstanding notes into equity, but not the obligation. A 9.99% blocker shall be in effect such that GPB agrees to restrict its holdings of our common stock shares to less than 9.99% of the total number of our outstanding common stock shares at any one point in time. All royalty payments owed to GPB pursuant thereto shall remain our obligations to GPB and shall remain in full force and effect. We shall have 8 months from the execution date of this exchange agreement, subject to early termination as forth below (in “forbearance agreement”). We shall be entitled to extend the forbearance agreement for four additional months for a $50,000 per month payment. If after the financing is completed and in the event of future financings or significant collaborations with a partner generating sales greater than $1,000,000, we agree to buy back $500,000 of the Series D preferred stock shares. The interest rate will revert to their original non default rates. Also, all existing warrants issued prior to exchange agreement will be canceled.

 

 

On March 31, 2020, we entered into a securities purchase agreement with Auctus Fund, LLC for the issuance and sale to Auctus of $112,750 in aggregate principal amount of a 12% convertible promissory note. On March 31, 2020, we issued the note to Auctus and issued 250,000 five-year common stock warrants at an exercise price of $0.16. On April 3, 2020, we received net proceeds of $100,000. The note matures on January 26, 2021 and accrues interest at a rate of 12% per year. We may not prepay the note, in whole or in part. After the 90th calendar day after the issuance date, and ending on the later of maturity date and the date of payment of the default amount, Auctus may convert the note, at any time, in whole or in part, provided such conversion does not provide Auctus with more than 4.99% of the outstanding common share stock. The conversion may be made converted into shares of the our common stock, at a conversion price equal to the lesser of: (i) the lowest Trading Price during the twenty-five (25) trading day period on the latest complete trading prior to the issue date and (ii) the variable conversion price (55% multiplied by the market price, market price means the lowest trading price for the common stock during the twenty-five (25) trading day period ending on the latest complete trading day prior to the conversion date. Trading price is the lowest trade price on the trading market as reported. The note includes customary events of default provisions and a default interest rate of 24% per year.

 

Capital resources for 2019

 

On December 5, 2019, we entered into an exchange agreement with Aquarius. Based on this agreement we will exchange $145,544 of debt outstanding for: 291,088 common stock shares; 145,544 warrants to purchase common stock shares at a strike price of $0.25; and 145,544 warrants to purchase common stock shares at a strike price of $0.75.

 

On December 30, 2019, we entered into an exchange agreement with K2 Medical. Based on this agreement we will exchange $790,544 of debt outstanding for: 1,905,270 common stock shares; 496,602 warrants to purchase common stock shares at a strike price of $0.20; 704,334 warrants to purchase common stock shares at a strike price of $0.25; and 704,334 warrants to purchase common stock shares at a strike price of $0.75.

 

On December 30, 2019, we entered into an exchange agreement with Mr. Blumberg. Based on this agreement we will exchange $305,320 of debt outstanding for: 1,167,630 common stock shares; 928,318 warrants to purchase common stock shares at a strike price of $0.20; 119,656 warrants to purchase common stock shares at a strike price of $0.25; and 119,656 warrants to purchase common stock shares at a strike price of $0.75.

 

On December 30, 2019, we entered into an exchange agreement with Mr. Case. Based on this agreement we will exchange $179,291 of debt outstanding for: 896,455 common stock shares; and 896,456 warrants to purchase common stock shares at a strike price of $0.20.

 

On December 30, 2019, we entered into an exchange agreement with Mr. Grimm. Based on this agreement we will exchange $51,110 of debt outstanding for: 255,548 common stock shares; and 255,548 warrants to purchase common stock shares at a strike price of $0.20.

 

On December 30, 2019, we entered into an exchange agreement with Mr. Gould. Based on this agreement we will exchange $111,227 of debt outstanding for: 556,136 common stock shares; and 556,136 warrants to purchase common stock shares at a strike price of $0.20.

 

On December 30, 2019, we entered into an exchange agreement with Mr. Mamula. Based on this agreement we will exchange $15,577 of debt outstanding for: 77,885 common stock shares; and 77,885 warrants to purchase common stock shares at a strike price of $0.20.

 

On December 30, 2019, we entered into an exchange agreement with Mr. Imhoff. Based on this agreement we will exchange $400,417 of debt outstanding for: 1,699,255 common stock shares; 1,497,367 warrants to purchase common stock shares at a strike price of $0.20; 100,944 warrants to purchase common stock shares at a strike price of $0.25; and 100,944 warrants to purchase common stock shares at a strike price of $0.75.

 

On December 30, 2019, we entered into an exchange agreement with Ms. Rosenstock. Based on this agreement we will exchange $78,986 of debt outstanding for: 100,000 common stock shares; and 50,000 warrants to purchase common stock shares at a strike price of $0.25; and 50,000 warrants to purchase common stock shares at a strike price of $0.75. Ms. Rosenstock also forgave $28,986 in debt.

 

On July 1, 2019, we entered into a loan agreement with Accilent Capital Management Inc / Rev Royalty Income and Growth Trust (“Accilent”), providing for the purchase by Rev of an unsecured promissory note in the principal amount of $49,389 (CAD$ 65,500). The note was fully funded on July 9, 2019 (net of a 8% original issue discount and other expenses). The note bears an interest rate of 16% and was due and payable on September 11, 2019. Following maturity, demand, default, or judgment and until actual payment in full, interest rate shall be paid at the rate of 19% per annum. We will issue warrants to purchase one common share for each warrant held in the aggregate amount of 215,000 warrants at an exercise price of $0.25 per warrant, or alternatively, the same price as for warrants granted to investors as part of our financing subject to adjustment and exercisable within 3 years from issuance (the “Initial Warrants”). In the event that the common shares of the Issuer were not listed on the TSX Venture Exchange pursuant to the “Transaction” on or prior to September 1, 2019, an additional 100,000 warrants will be issued at an exercise price equal to the lesser of $0.25 or the price of the next issuance of common shares of the Issuer (the “Revised Exercise Price”). Further, the exercise price of the Initial Warrants will adjust to the Revised Exercise Price has stated herein. As of December 31, 2019, $57,946 remained outstanding, which included a fee of $3,951 and accrued interest of $4,606.

 

 

Auctus Note

 

On December 17, 2019, we entered into a securities purchase agreement and convertible note with Auctus. The convertible note issued to Auctus will be for a total of $2.4 million. The first tranche of $700,000 has been received and will have a maturity date of December 17, 2021 and an interest rate of ten percent (10%). The note may not be prepaid in whole or in part except as otherwise explicitly allowed. Any amount of principal or interest on the note which is not paid when due shall bear interest at the rate of the lessor of 24% and the maximum permitted by law (the “default interest”). The variable conversion prices shall equal the lesser of: (i) the lowest trading price on the issue date, and (ii) the variable conversion price. The variable conversion price shall mean 95% multiplied by the market price (the market price means the average of the five lowest trading prices during the period beginning on the issue date and ending on the maturity date), minus $0.04 per share, provided however that in no event shall the variable conversion price be less than $0.15. If an event of default under this note occurs and/or the note is not extinguished in its entirety prior to December 17, 2020 the $0.15 price shall no longer apply. In addition, Auctus will receive 7,500,000 five-year common stock purchase warrants, at an exercise price of $0.20, on the first tranche of $700,000. From the $700,000, received $570,000, $65,000 went to attorney’s fees and Auctus Fund Management, and $65,000 was paid for the partial payment of an $89,250 promissory note that was issued on July 3, 2018 to Auctus. At a future date, the second tranche of $400,000 will be received when we register the underlying shares. The last tranche of $1.3 million will be received within 60 days of the S-1 registration statement becoming effective. The conversion price of the notes will be at market value with a minimum conversion amount of $0.15. The last two tranches will have warrants attached. As of December 31, 2019, $700,000 remained outstanding and accrued interest of $2,722.

 

In the event (i) the we make a public announcement of certain merger or consolidation or sale of substantially all of its assets or (ii) any person (including our company) publicly announces a tender offer to purchase 50% or more of the outstanding Common Stock, then the Conversion Price shall equal the lower of (x) the Conversion Price which would have been applicable before the date of such announcement and (y) the Conversion Price that would otherwise be in effect until the transaction is consummated or abandoned.

 

We shall include on each registration statement it files with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) all the shares of Common Stock issuable upon conversion of the Auctus Note and exercise of the Auctus Warrant (the “Auctus Registrable Securities”). We will be subject to liquidated damages of 25% of the outstanding principal balance of the Auctus Note, but not less than $15,000, if it fails to comply with the registration requirement.

 

Six months following the date of the Auctus Note, Auctus shall have the right to redeem all or a portion of the Auctus Note, up to the maximum monthly redemption amount as set forth in the Auctus Note. Payments for such redemption maybe made either in cash or shares or a combination of both.

 

The Auctus Warrant entitles its holder to purchase 7,500,000 shares of the Common Stock at an exercise price of $0.2 per share (the “Exercise Price”), subject to certain adjustments as provided in the Auctus Warrant. If we at any time while the Auctus Warrant is outstanding, sells any Common Stock or securities entitling any person to acquire shares of Common Stock at an effective price per share less than the then Exercise Price (such lower price, the “Base Share Price” and such issuances collectively, a “Dilutive Issuance”), then the Exercise Price shall be reduced at the option of the holder and only reduced to equal the Base Share Price, and the number of Warrant Shares issuable hereunder shall be increased proportionately. The Auctus Warrant may be exercised cashlessly if there is no effective registration statement covering the Common Stock issuable upon exercise of the Auctus Warrant. The Auctus Warrant contains a 4.99% beneficial ownership blocker.

 

Pursuant to a Security Agreement between Auctus (the “Auctus Security Agreement”) and us dated December 17, 2019, all our obligations under the Auctus Note are secured by our assets and personal properties, subordinate only to the our obligations to GPB Debt Holdings II LLC and senior to all other obligations.

 

On December 17, 2019, we also entered into a Registration Rights Agreement (the “Auctus Registration Rights Agreement”) with Actus pursuant to which, we agreed to file with the SEC a registration statement covering the maximum number of the Auctus Registrable Securities within 90 days of the date of the Registration Rights Agreement and use its reasonable best efforts to amend or file a new Registration Statement to cover all the Registrable Securities as soon as practicable. All reasonable expenses related to such registration shall be borne by us.

 

Series D Financing

 

During December 2019 and January 2020, the Company received equity investments in the amount of $738,000. These investors received a total of 1,476,000 common stock shares and 1,476,000 warrants to purchase common stock shares at a strike price of $0.25, 1,476,000 warrants to purchase common stock shares at a strike price of $0.75 and 738 Series D preferred stock shares (each Series D preferred stock share converts into 3,000 shares of the Company’s common stock shares). Of the amount invested $388,000 was from related parties.

 

 

We agreed use commercially reasonable efforts to have its Common Stock listed on the TSX Venture Exchange. Commencing on the date of listing of the Common Stock on TSX Venture Exchange, each Series D Investor has the right, upon 5 days’ notice to us, to exchange its Series D Preferred into certain 12% Senior Secured Debentures (the “Debentures”) on the basis of $1 Stated Value of Series D Preferred for $1 principal amount of the Debentures. The Debentures shall bear interest at 10% per annum, payable quarterly in cash or, at our option, in shares of Common Stock at the average of the 20 VWAPs (as defined in the Debentures) immediately prior to the payment date.

 

Each share of Series D Preferred is convertible, at any time for a period of 5 years after issuance, into that number of shares of Common Stock, determined by dividing the Stated Value by $0.25, subject to certain adjustments set forth in the Series D Certificate of Designation (the “Series D Conversion Price”). The conversion of Series D Preferred is subject to a 4.99% beneficial ownership limitation, which may be increased to 9.99% at the election of the holder of the Series D Preferred. If the average of the VWAPs (as defined in the Series D Certificate of Designation) for any consecutive 5 trading day period (“Measurement Period”) exceeds 200% of the then Series D Conversion Price and the average daily trading volume of the Common Stock on the primary trading market exceeds a number of shares per trading day during the Measurement Period (subject to adjustments), the Company may redeem the then outstanding Series D Preferred, for cash in an amount equal to aggregate Stated Value then outstanding plus accrued but unpaid dividends .

 

The Series D Warrants may be exercised cashlessly if there is no effective registration statement covering the Common Stock issuable upon exercise of the Series D Warrants. The Series D Warrants contain a 4.99% beneficial ownership blocker which may be increased to 9.99% at the holder’s election.

 

On December 30, 2019, we also entered into a Security Agreement with the Series D Investors (the “Series D Security Agreement”) pursuant to which all obligations under the Debentures and the Series D Certificate of Designation are secured by all of our assets and personal properties.

 

On December 30, 2019, we also entered into a Registration Rights Agreement (the “Series D Registration Rights Agreement “) with the Series D Investors pursuant to which we agreed to file with the SEC, a registration statement on a Form S-3 (or on other appropriate form if a Form S-3 is not available) covering the Common Stock issuable upon conversion of the Debentures or exercise of the Series D Warrants within 90 days of the date of the Registration Rights Agreement and cause such registration statement to be declared effective within 120 days of the date of the Registration Rights Agreement. All reasonable expenses related to such registration shall be borne by us.

 

On February 14, 2019, we entered into a Purchase and Sale Agreement with Everest Business Funding for the sale of its accounts receivable. The transaction provided us with $48,735 after $1,265 in debt issuance costs (bank costs) for a total purchase amount of $50,000, in which we would have to repay $68,500. At a minimum we would need to pay $535.16 per day or 20.0% of the future collected accounts receivable or “receipts.” The effective interest rate as calculated for this transaction is approximately 132.5%. As of December 31, 2019, $60,484 had been paid, leaving a balance of $8,016, the discount and unamortized debt issuance costs had been fully amortized.

 

Effective March 29, 2019, we entered into a securities purchase with Auctus for the issuance of a $65,000 convertible promissory note. At issuance, we recorded a $65,000 beneficial conversion feature, which was fully amortized at December 31, 2019. The note accrued interest at a rate of 12% until it matured in December 2019. Beginning December 2019, the note is convertible, in whole or in part, at the holder's option, into shares of our stock at a conversion price equal to 50% of the lowest trading price during the 25 trading days prior to conversion. Upon the occurrence of an event of default, the note will bear interest at a rate of 24% per year and the holder of the note we may be required to redeem or convert the note at 150% of the outstanding principal balance. At December 31, 2019, the balance due on this total was $106,210, including a default penalty of $41,210. Interest accrued on the note totaled $142 at December 31, 2019 and is included in accrued expenses on the accompanying consolidated balance sheet.

 

On May 15, 2019, we entered into a securities purchase agreement with Eagle Equities, LLC, providing for the purchase by Eagle of a convertible redeemable note in the principal amount of $57,750. The note was fully funded on May 21, 2019, upon which we received $45,000 of net proceeds (net of a 10% original issue discount and other expenses). The note bears an interest rate of 8% and are due and payable on May 15, 2020. We could have prepaid the note, in whole or in part, for 115% of outstanding principal and interest until 30 days from issuance, for 121% of outstanding principal and interest at any time from 31 to 60 days from issuance, for 127% of outstanding principal and interest at any time from 61 to 90 days from issuance, for 133% of outstanding principal and interest at any time from 91 to 120 days from issuance, for 139% of outstanding principal and interest at any time from 121 to 150 days from issuance and for 145% of outstanding principal and interest at any time from 151 days from issuance to 180 days from issuance. The note may not be prepaid after the 180th day. The note may be converted by Eagle at any time after five months from issuance into shares of our common stock (as determined in the notes) calculated at the time of conversion. The conversion price of the notes will be equal to 60% of the average of the two lowest closing bid prices of our common stock shares as reported on OTC Markets exchange, for the 20 prior trading days including the day upon which we receive a notice of conversion is received by us. The notes may be prepaid in accordance with the terms set forth in the notes. The notes also contain certain representations, warranties, covenants and events of default including if we are delinquent in our periodic report filings with the SEC and increases in the amount of the principal and interest rates under the notes in the event of such defaults. In the event of default, at Eagle’s option and in its sole discretion, Eagle may consider the notes immediately due and payable. As of December 31, 2019, the outstanding note was for $27,817, which consisted of unamortized balance of $14,438 of a beneficial conversion feature, unamortized original issue discount of $1,942, unamortized debt issuance costs of $2,774 and interest of $1,166 included in accrued expenses on the accompanying consolidated balance sheet.

 

 

On May 15, 2019, we entered into a securities purchase agreement with Adar Bays, LLC, providing for the purchase by Adar of a convertible redeemable note in the principal amount of $57,750. The note was fully funded on May 21, 2019, upon which we received $45,000 of net proceeds (net of a 10% original issue discount and other expenses). The note bears an interest rate of 8% and are due and payable on May 15, 2020. We could have prepaid the note, in whole or in part, for 115% of outstanding principal and interest until 30 days from issuance, for 121% of outstanding principal and interest at any time from 31 to 60 days from issuance, for 127% of outstanding principal and interest at any time from 61 to 90 days from issuance, for 133% of outstanding principal and interest at any time from 91 to 120 days from issuance, for 139% of outstanding principal and interest at any time from 121 to 150 days from issuance and for 145% of outstanding principal and interest at any time from 151 days from issuance to 180 days from issuance. The note may not be prepaid after the 180th day. The note may be converted by Adar at any time after five months from issuance into shares of our common stock (as determined in the notes) calculated at the time of conversion. The conversion price of the notes will be equal to 60% of the average of the two lowest closing bid prices of our common stock shares as reported on OTC Markets exchange, for the 20 prior trading days including the day upon which we receive a notice of conversion is received by us. The notes may be prepaid in accordance with the terms set forth in the notes. The notes also contain certain representations, warranties, covenants and events of default including if we are delinquent in our periodic report filings with the SEC and increases in the amount of the principal and interest rates under the notes in the event of such defaults. In the event of default, at Adar’s option and in its sole discretion, Adar may consider the notes immediately due and payable. In addition, we had recorded a $38,500 beneficial conversion feature, $5,250 original issue discount and $7,500 of debt issuance costs. As of December 31, 2019, the note outstanding increased to $87,970 as a default penalty of $27,030 was added to the outstanding balance of the note, which consisted of unamortized balance of $14,438 of a beneficial conversion feature, unamortized original issue discount of $1,942, unamortized debt issuance costs of $2,774 and interest of $3,190 included in accrued expenses on the accompanying consolidated balance sheet.

 

See “—Recent Developments” for information regarding capital-raising activities since December 31, 2019.

 

We will be required to raise additional funds through public or private financing, additional collaborative relationships or other arrangements, as soon as possible. We cannot be certain that our existing and available capital resources will be sufficient to satisfy our funding requirements through 2019. We are evaluating various options to further reduce our cash requirements to operate at a reduced rate, as well as options to raise additional funds, including loans.

 

Generally, substantial capital will be required to develop our products, including completing product testing and clinical trials, obtaining all required U.S. and foreign regulatory approvals and clearances, and commencing and scaling up manufacturing and marketing our products. Any failure to obtain capital would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Based on discussions with our distributors, we expect to generate purchase orders for approximately $1.0 to $2.0 million in LuViva devices and disposables in 2020 and expect those purchase orders to result in actual sales of $0.5 to $1.0 million in 2020, representing what we view as current demand for our products. We cannot be assured that we will generate all or any of these additional purchase orders, or that existing orders will not be canceled by the distributors or that parts to build product will be available to meet demand, such that existing orders will result in actual sales. Because we have a short history of sales of our products, we cannot confidently predict future sales of our products beyond this time frame and cannot be assured of any particular amount of sales. Accordingly, we have not identified any particular trends with regard to sales of our products.

 

Our financial statements have been prepared and presented on a basis assuming we will continue as a going concern. The above factors raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern, as more fully discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements contained herein and in the report of our independent registered public accounting firm accompanying our financial statements contained in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019.

 

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

 

We have no material off-balance sheet arrangements, no special purpose entities, and no activities that include non-exchange-traded contracts accounted for at fair value.

 

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk.

 

Not applicable.

 

 

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

 

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

 

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of

Guided Therapeutics, Inc.

 

Opinion on the Financial Statements

 

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Guided Therapeutics, Inc. and Subsidiary. (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ deficit, and cash flows for the years then ended, and the related notes (collectively, the “consolidated financial statements”). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

 

Substantial Doubt about the Company’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company has recurring losses from operations, limited cash flow, and an accumulated deficit. These conditions raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. Management's plans in regard to these matters are also described in Note 1. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustment that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty. Our opinion is not modified with respect to that matter.

 

Basis for Opinion

 

These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

 

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.

 

Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risk of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

 

We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2007.

 

/s/ UHY LLP

UHY LLP

 

Sterling Heights, Michigan

April 20, 2020

  

 

GUIDED THERAPEUTICS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (in thousands)

AS OF DECEMBER 31,

 

 

ASSETS	2019	2018
CURRENT ASSETS:
Cash and cash equivalents	$899	$-
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $114 and $157 at December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively	13	13
Inventory, net of reserves of $831 and $767 at December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively	48	114
Other current assets	70	69
Total current assets	1,030	196
NONCURRENT ASSETS:
Property and equipment, net	-	21
Lease asset-right, net of amortization	132	-
Other assets	18	19
Total noncurrent assets	150	40
TOTAL ASSETS	1,180	236
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT
CURRENT LIABILITIES:
Notes payable in default, related parties	349	334
Notes payable in default	427	366
Short-term notes payable	380	225
Short-term notes payable, related parties	646	674
Convertible notes in default	2,915	2,778
Short-term convertible notes payable	73	-
Short-term convertible notes payable, related parties	513	380
Accounts payable	2,897	3,013
Accounts payable, related parties	136	-
Accrued liabilities	3,235	3,156
Subscription receivable	635	-
Current portion of lease liability	103	-
Deferred revenue	101	66
Total current liabilities	12,410	10,992
LONG-TERM LIABILITIES:
Warrants, at fair value	5,092	4,728
Lease liability	29	-
Long-term convertible notes payable, net	15	-
Long-term debt-related parties	569	340
Total long-term liabilities	5,705	5,068
TOTAL LIABILITIES	18,115	16,060
COMMITMENTS & CONTINGENCIES (Note 8)

 

STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT:
Series C convertible preferred stock, $.001 par value; 9.0 shares authorized, 0.3 shares issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. (Liquidation preference of $286 at December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively).	105	105
Series C1 convertible preferred stock, $.001 par value; 20.3 shares authorized, 1.0 shares issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. (Liquidation preference of $1,049 at December 31, 2019 and 2018).	170	170
Series C2 convertible preferred stock, $.001 par value; 5,000 shares authorized, 3.3 shares issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. (Liquidation preference of $3,263 at December 31, 2019 and 2018).	531	531
Common stock, $.001 par value; 3,000,000 shares authorized, 3,319 and 2,669 shares issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively	3,394	2,877
Additional paid-in capital	118,552	118,259
Treasury stock, at cost	(132)	(132)
Accumulated deficit	(139,555)	(137,634)
TOTAL STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT	(16,935)	(15,824)
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT	1,180	236

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated statements.

 

 

GUIDED THERAPEUTICS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (in thousands)

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,

 

	2019	2018
REVENUE:
Sales – devices and disposables, net	$36	$57
Cost of goods sold	70	89
Gross loss	(34)	(32)
OPERATING EXPENSES:
Research and development	122	244
Sales and marketing	87	195
General and administrative	694	1,077
Total operating expenses	903	1,516
Operating loss	(937)	(1,548)
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSES):
Other income	48	54
Interest expense	(1,412)	(1,763)
Gain from extinguishment of debt	-	1,039
Change in fair value of warrants	380	3,234
Total other income (expenses)	(984)	2,564
(LOSS) INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES	(1,921)	1,016
PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES	-	-
NET (LOSS) INCOME	(1,921)	1,016
PREFERRED STOCK DIVIDENDS	-	(116)
NET (LOSS) INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO COMMON STOCKHOLDERS	$(1,921)	$900
NET (LOSS) INCOME PER SHARE ATTRIBUTABLE TO COMMON STOCKHOLDERS
BASIC	$(0.58)	$1.95
DILUTED	$(0.58)	$0.0138
WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES OUTSTANDING
BASIC	3,302	462
DILUTED	3,302	65,227

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated statements.

 

 

GUIDED THERAPEUTICS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2019 AND 2018 (In Thousands)

 

	Preferred Stock Series C		Preferred Stock Series C1		Preferred Stock Series C2		Common Stock		Additional Paid-In	Treasury	Accumulated
	Shares	Amount	Shares	Amount	Shares	Amount	Shares	Amount	Capital	Stock	Deficit	TOTAL
BALANCE, January 1, 2018	1	$355	4	$701	-	$-	62	$791	$117,416	$(132)	$(138,533)	$(19,402)
Issuance of warrants with debt	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	20	-	-	20
Conversion of Series C preferred stock to common stock	(1)	(250)	-	-	-	-	160	128	409	-	(117)	170
Conversion of debt into common stock	-	-	-	-	-	-	2,359	1,888	(963)	-	-	925
Issuance of common stock	-	-	-	-	-	-	88	70	(23)	-	-	47
Exchange of Series C1 for C2 preferred stock	-	-	(3)	(531)	3	531	-	-	-	-	-	-
Beneficial conversion feature for convertible debt	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	689	-	-	689
Stock-based compensation	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	44	-	-	44
Forgiveness of debt	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	667	-	-	667
Net income	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1,016	1,016
BALANCE, December 31, 2018	-	$105	1	$170	3	$531	2,669	$2,877	$118,259	$(132)	$(137,634)	$(15,824)
Shares in transit	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	692	-	-	692
Conversion of debt into common stock	-	-	-	-	-	-	650	517	(484)	-	-	33
Beneficial conversion feature of convertible debt	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	77	-	-	77
Stock-based compensation	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	8	-	-	8
Net income	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	(1,921)	(1,921)
BALANCE, December 31, 2019	-	$105	1	$170	3	$531	3,319	$3,394	$118,552	$(132)	$(139,555)	$(16,935)

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated statements.

 

 

GUIDED THERAPEUTICS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,

(In Thousands)

 

	2019	2018
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net (loss) income	$(1,921)	$1,016
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash used in operating activities:
Bad debt expense	-	1
Depreciation	21	27
Amortization of debt issuance costs and discounts	105	190
Amortization of beneficial conversion feature	92	645
Stock based compensation	8	44
Change in fair value of warrants	(380)	(3,234)
Gain on extinguishment of debt	-	(1,039)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable	-	(10)
Inventory	66	151
Other current assets	(2)	42
Other assets	1	41
Accounts payable	20	(6)
Deferred revenue	35	45
Accrued liabilities	1,149	722
Total adjustments	1,115	(2,382)
Net cash used in operating activities	(806)	(1,365)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Proceeds from debt financing, net of discounts and debt issuance costs	1,351	1,386
Payments made on notes and loans payable	(281)	(192)
Proceeds for future issuance of common stock, warrants and preferred stock	635	126
Net proceeds from issuance of common stock and warrants	-	44
Net cash provided by financing activities	1,705	1,364
NET CHANGE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS	899	(1)
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, beginning of year	-	1
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, end of year	$899	$-
SUPPLEMENTAL SCHEDULE OF:
Cash paid for:
Interest	$14	$116
NONCASH INVESTING AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Issuance of common stock as debt repayment	$33	$925
Dividends on preferred stock	$-	$116

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated statements.

 

 

GUIDED THERAPEUTICS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 DECEMBER 31, 2019 AND 2018

 

 

1. ORGANIZATION, BACKGROUND, AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION

 

Guided Therapeutics, Inc. (formerly SpectRx, Inc.), together with its wholly owned subsidiary, InterScan, Inc. (formerly Guided Therapeutics, Inc.), collectively referred to herein as the “Company”, is a medical technology company focused on developing innovative medical devices that have the potential to improve healthcare. The Company’s primary focus is the continued commercialization of its LuViva non-invasive cervical cancer detection device and extension of its cancer detection technology into other cancers, including esophageal. The Company’s technology, including products in research and development, primarily relates to biophotonics technology for the non-invasive detection of cancers.

 

Basis of Presentation

 

All information and footnote disclosures included in the consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.

 

A 1:800 reverse stock split of all of the Company’s issued and outstanding common stock was implemented on March 29, 2019. As a result of the reverse stock split, every 800 shares of issued and outstanding common stock were converted into 1 share of common stock. All fractional shares created by the reverse stock split were rounded to the nearest whole share. The number of authorized shares of common stock did not change. The reverse stock split decreased the Company’s issued and outstanding shares of common stock from 2,652,309,322 shares to 3,319,486 shares as of that date with rounding. See Note 4, Stockholders’ Deficit. Unless otherwise specified, all per share amounts are reported on a post-stock split basis, as of December 31, 2019 and 2018.

 

The Company’s prospects must be considered in light of the substantial risks, expenses and difficulties encountered by entrants into the medical device industry. This industry is characterized by an increasing number of participants, intense competition and a high failure rate. The Company has experienced net losses since its inception and, as of December 31, 2019, it had an accumulated deficit of approximately $139.6 million. To date, the Company has engaged primarily in research and development efforts and the early stages of marketing its products. The Company may not be successful in growing sales for its products. Moreover, required regulatory clearances or approvals may not be obtained in a timely manner, or at all. The Company’s products may not ever gain market acceptance and the Company may not ever generate significant revenues or achieve profitability. The development and commercialization of the Company’s products requires substantial development, regulatory, sales and marketing, manufacturing and other expenditures. The Company expects operating losses to continue for the foreseeable future as it continues to expend substantial resources to complete development of its products, obtain regulatory clearances or approvals, build its marketing, sales, manufacturing and finance capabilities, and conduct further research and development.

 

Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified in order to conform to the current year presentation.

 

Going Concern

 

The Company’s consolidated financial statements have been prepared and presented on a basis assuming it will continue as a going concern. The factors below raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might be necessary from the outcome of this uncertainty.

 

At December 31, 2019, the Company had a negative working capital of approximately $11.4 million, accumulated deficit of $139.6 million, and incurred a net loss of $1.9 million for the year then ended (the net loss for the year ended December 31, 2019 was primarily realized due to a $1.4 million in interest expense). Stockholders’ deficit totaled approximately $16.9 million at December 31, 2019, primarily due to recurring net losses from operations, deemed dividends on warrants and preferred stock, offset by proceeds from the exercise of options and warrants and proceeds from sales of stock.

 

During the end of 2019 and beginning of 2020, the Company was able to raise $1.4 million in equity and debt investments. In addition, the Company has executed several exchange agreements that will convert debt for equity, as well as eliminate some existing debt. The Company’s capital-raising efforts are ongoing and the Company has taken the following steps to increase the likelihood of a successful financing: 1) Applied to the Canadian Stock Exchange for a possible listing, 2) Debt has been significantly reduced and additional agreements are in place, contingent on a successful financing, to reduce debt even further either by forgiveness of debt and/or exchanges of debt for equity and 3) Monthly operating expenses are scrutinized and controlled. If sufficient capital cannot be raised during 200, the Company will continue its plans of curtailing operations by reducing discretionary spending and staffing levels and attempting to operate by only pursuing activities for which it has external financial support. However, there can be no assurance that such external financial support will be sufficient to maintain even limited operations or that the Company will be able to raise additional funds on acceptable terms, or at all. In such a case, the Company might be required to enter into unfavorable agreements or, if that is not possible, be unable to continue operations, and to the extent practicable, liquidate and/or file for bankruptcy protection.

 

 

The Company had warrants exercisable for approximately 46.0 million shares of its common stock outstanding at December 31, 2019, with exercise prices ranging between $0.04 and $60,000 per share. Exercises of these warrants would generate a total of approximately $1.6 million in cash, assuming full exercise, although the Company cannot be assured that holders will exercise any warrants. Management may obtain additional funds through the public or private sale of debt or equity, and grants, if available. However, please refer to Footnote 11 - CONVERTIBLE DEBT IN DEFAULT in the paragraph: Debt Restructuring for more information regarding our warrants.

 

2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

 

Use of Estimates

 

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Significant areas where estimates are used include the allowance for doubtful accounts, inventory valuation and input variables for Black-Scholes, Monte Carlo simulations and binomial calculations. The Company uses the Monte Carlo simulations and binomial calculations in the calculation of the fair value of the warrant liabilities and the valuation of embedded conversion options and freestanding warrants.

 

Principles of Consolidation

 

The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Guided Therapeutics, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiary. All intercompany transactions are eliminated.

 

Accounting Standard Updates

 

Implemented

 

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, “Leases (Topic 842)” that requires lessees to recognize on the balance sheet the assets and liabilities associated with the rights and obligations created by those leases. Under the new guidance, a lessee is required to recognize assets and liabilities for leases with lease terms of more than 12 months. Consistent with current U.S. GAAP, the recognition, measurement, and presentation of expenses and cash flows arising from a lease by a lessee primarily depends on its classification as finance or operating lease. The update is effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018. The adoption resulted in the Company in recognizing a lease asset and a corresponding lease liability of $213,000 at adoption.

 

In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued ASU 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Distributors (Topic 606),” (“ASU 2014-09”). ASU 2014-09 outlines a new, single comprehensive model for entities to use in accounting for revenue arising from contracts with distributors and supersedes most current revenue recognition guidance, including industry-specific guidance. This new revenue recognition model provides a five-step analysis in determining when and how revenue is recognized. The new model requires revenue recognition to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to distributors in an amount that reflects the consideration a company expects to receive. ASU 2014-09 also requires additional disclosure about the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from customer contracts, including significant judgments and changes in judgments and assets recognized from costs incurred to obtain or fulfill a contract. In August 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-14, “Deferral of the Effective Date”, which amends ASU 2014-09. As a result, the effective date will be the first quarter of fiscal year 2018 with early adoption permitted in the first quarter of fiscal year 2017. Subsequently, the FASB has issued the following standards related to ASU 2014-09: ASU 2016-08, “Revenue from Contracts with Distributors (Topic 606), Principal versus Agent Considerations (Reporting Revenue Gross versus Net),” (“ASU 2016-08”); ASU 2016-10, “Revenue from Contracts with Distributors (Topic 606), Identifying Performance Obligations and Licensing,” (“ASU 2016-10”); ASU 2016-12, “Revenue from Contracts with Distributors (Topic 606) Narrow-Scope Improvements and Practical Expedients,” (“ASU 2016-12”); and ASU 2016-20, “Technical Corrections and Improvements to Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Distributors,” (“ASU 2016-20”), which are intended to provide additional guidance and clarity to ASU 2014-09. The Company must adopt ASU 2016-08, ASU 2016-10, ASU 2016-12 and ASU 2016-20 along with ASU 2014-09 (collectively, the “New Revenue Standards”). The New Revenue Standards may be applied using one of two retrospective application methods: (1) a full retrospective approach for all periods presented, or (2) a modified retrospective approach that presents a cumulative effect as of the adoption date and additional required disclosures. The Company has evaluated the adoption of this guidance and has taken a modified retrospective approach to the presentation of revenue from contracts with distributors. The Company adopted this standard on January 1, 2018, using the modified retrospective method, with no impact on its 2018 financial statements. The cumulative effect of initially applying the new guidance had no impact on its financial statements in future periods.

 

 

In February 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-02, Income Statement – Reporting Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Reclassification of Certain Tax Effects from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income. The amendment of ASU 2018-02 states an entity may elect to reclassify the income tax effects of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (the “Tax Cuts and Jobs Act”) on items within accumulated other comprehensive income to retained earnings. The amendments in this update are effective for annual periods, and interim periods within those annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2018. Early adoption is permitted. The adoption did not have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

 

Except as noted above, the guidance issued by the FASB during the current year is not expected to have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

 

A variety of proposed or otherwise potential accounting standards are currently under consideration by standard-setting organizations and certain regulatory agencies. Because of the tentative and preliminary nature of such proposed standards, management has not yet determined the effect, if any, that the implementation of such proposed standards would have on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

 

Cash Equivalents

 

The Company considers all highly liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or less when purchased to be a cash equivalent.

 

Accounts Receivable

 

The Company performs periodic credit evaluations of its distributors’ financial conditions and generally does not require collateral. The Company reviews all outstanding accounts receivable for collectability on a quarterly basis. An allowance for doubtful accounts is recorded for any amounts deemed uncollectable. The Company does not accrue interest receivable on past due accounts receivable.

 

Concentrations of Credit Risk

 

The Company, from time to time during the years covered by these consolidated financial statements, may have bank balances in excess of its insured limits. Management has deemed this a normal business risk.

 

Inventory Valuation

 

All inventories are stated at lower of cost or net realizable value, with cost determined substantially on a “first-in, first-out” basis. Selling, general, and administrative expenses are not inventoried, but are charged to expense when incurred. At December 31, 2019 and 2018, our inventories were as follows (in thousands):

 

	Year Ended December 31,
	2019	2018
Raw materials	$781	$783
Work in process	81	81
Finished goods	17	17
Inventory reserve	(831)	(767)
Total	$48	$114

 

The company periodically reviews the value of items in inventory and provides write-downs or write-offs of inventory based on its assessment of market conditions. Write-downs and write-offs are charged to cost of goods sold.

 

Property and Equipment

 

Property and equipment are recorded at cost. Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method over estimated useful lives of three to seven years. Leasehold improvements are amortized at the shorter of the useful life of the asset or the remaining lease term. Depreciation and amortization expense is included in general and administrative expense on the statement of operations. Expenditures for repairs and maintenance are expensed as incurred. Property and equipment are summarized as follows at December 31, 2019 and 2018 (in thousands):

 

 

	Year Ended December 31,
	2019	2018
Equipment	$1,349	$1,378
Software	740	740
Furniture and fixtures	124	124
Leasehold Improvement	180	199
	2,393	2,441
Less accumulated depreciation	(2,393)	(2,420)
Total	$-	$21

 

Debt Issuance Costs

 

Debt issuance costs are capitalized and amortized over the term of the associated debt. Debt issuance costs are presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of the debt liability consistent with the debt discount.

 

Other Assets

 

Other assets primarily consist of a deposit for the corporate office.

 

Patent Costs (Principally Legal Fees)

 

Costs incurred in filing, prosecuting, and maintaining patents are recurring, and expensed as incurred. Maintaining patents are expensed as incurred as the Company has not yet received U.S. FDA approval and recovery of these costs is uncertain. Such costs aggregated approximately $15,000 and $11,000 in 2019 and 2018, respectively.

 

Leases

With the implementation of ASU 2016-02, “Leases (Topic 842)”, the Company recorded a lease asset-right and a lease liability. The implementation required the analysis of certain criteria in determining its treatment. The Company determined that its corporate office lease met those criteria. The Company implemented the guidance using the alternative transition method. Under this alternative, the effective date would be the date of initial application. The Company analyzed the lease at its effective date and calculated an initial lease payment amount of $267,380 with a present value of $213,000 using a 20% discount. As of December 31, 2019, the balance of the lease asset – right and lease liability was approximately $132,000.

 

The cumulative effect of initially applying the new guidance had an immaterial impact on the opening balance of retained earnings, The Company does not expect the guidance to have a material impact on its consolidated net earnings in future periods. The Company elected the Practical expedients permitted under the transition guidance within the new standards, which allowed the Company to carry forward the historical lease classification.

 

Accrued Liabilities

 

Accrued liabilities are summarized as follows at December 31, 2019 and 2018 (in thousands):

 

	Year Ended December 31,
	2019	2018
Compensation	$1,123	$1,030
Professional fees	181	203
Interest	1,603	892
Warranty	2	2
Vacation	41	53
Preferred dividends	120	120
Stock subscription for licenses	-	692
Other accrued expenses	165	164
Total	$3,235	$3,156

 

 

Subscription receivables

 

Cash received from investors for common stock shares that has not completed processing is recorded as a liability to subscription receivables. As of December 31, 2019, the Company had reserved 1,270,000 common stock shares in exchange for $635,000.

 

Revenue recognition

 

The Company follows, ASC 606 Revenue from Contracts with Customers establishes a single and comprehensive framework which sets out how much revenue is to be recognized, and when. The core principle is that a vendor should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the vendor expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. Revenue will now be recognized by a vendor when control over the goods or services is transferred to the customer. In contrast, Revenue based revenue recognition around an analysis of the transfer of risks and rewards; this now forms one of a number of criteria that are assessed in determining whether control has been transferred. The application of the core principle in ASC 606 is carried out in five steps: Step 1 – Identify the contract with a customer: a contract is defined as an agreement (including oral and implied), between two or more parties, that creates enforceable rights and obligations and sets out the criteria for each of those rights and obligations. The contract needs to have commercial substance and it is probable that the entity will collect the consideration to which it will be entitled. Step 2 – Identify the performance obligations in the contract: a performance obligation in a contract is a promise (including implicit) to transfer a good or service to the customer. Each performance obligation should be capable of being distinct and is separately identifiable in the contract. Step 3 – Determine the transaction price: transaction price is the amount of consideration that the entity can be entitled to, in exchange for transferring the promised goods and services to a customer, excluding amounts collected on behalf of third parties. Step 4 – Allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract: for a contract that has more than one performance obligation, the entity will allocate the transaction price to each performance obligation separately, in exchange for satisfying each performance obligation. The acceptable methods of allocating the transaction price include adjusted market assessment approach, expected cost plus a margin approach, and, the residual approach in limited circumstances. Discounts given should be allocated proportionately to all performance obligations unless certain criteria are met and reallocation of changes in standalone selling prices after inception is not permitted. Step 5 – Recognize revenue as and when the entity satisfies a performance obligation: the entity should recognize revenue at a point in time, except if it meets any of the three criteria, which will require recognition of revenue over time: the entity’s performance creates or enhances an asset controlled by the customer, the customer simultaneously receives and consumes the benefit of the entity’s performance as the entity performs, and the entity does not create an asset that has an alternative use to the entity and the entity has the right to be paid for performance to date.

 

Revenue by product line:

 

	Year Ended December 31,
	2019	2018
Devices	$17	$17
Disposables	2	32
Other	15	1
Warranty	2	7
Total	$36	$57

 

Revenue by geographic location:

 

	Year Ended December 31,
	2019	2018
Asia	$22	$49
Africa	-	8
Europe	14	-
Total	$36	$57