HALLMARK FINANCIAL SERVICES INC - Quarter Report: 2008 September (Form 10-Q)
UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON,
D.C. 20549
FORM
10-Q
Quarterly
report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities
Exchange Act of 1934
For
the
quarterly period ended September 30, 2008
Commission
file number 001-11252
Hallmark
Financial Services, Inc.
(Exact
name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Nevada
|
87-0447375
|
|
(State
or other jurisdiction of
|
(I.R.S.
Employer
|
|
Incorporation
or organization)
|
Identification
No.)
|
777
Main Street, Suite 1000, Fort Worth, Texas
|
76102
|
|
(Address
of principal executive offices)
|
(Zip
Code)
|
Registrant's
telephone number, including area code: (817) 348-1600
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to
be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required
to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements
for
the past 90 days. Yes x
No
¨
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.
See
the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller
reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Accelerated
filer ¨
|
||
Non-accelerated
filer ¨
|
Smaller
reporting company x
|
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨
No
x
Indicate
the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes of common
stock, as of the latest practicable date: Common Stock, par value $.18 per
share
- 20,808,954 shares outstanding as of November 12, 2008.
PART
I
FINANCIAL
INFORMATION
Item
1. Financial
Statements
INDEX
TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
||
Page
Number
|
||
Consolidated
Balance Sheets at September 30, 2008 (unaudited) and December 31,
2007
|
3
|
|
Consolidated
Statements of Operations (unaudited) for the three months and nine
months
ended September 30, 2008 and September 30, 2007
|
4
|
|
Consolidated
Statements of Stockholders’ Equity and Comprehensive Income (Loss)
(unaudited) for the three months and nine months ended September
30, 2008
and September 30, 2007
|
5
|
|
Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows (unaudited) for the nine months ended September
30, 2008 and September 30, 2007
|
6
|
|
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)
|
7
|
2
Hallmark
Financial Services, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated
Balance Sheets
($
in
thousands)
September 30
|
December 31
|
||||||
2008
|
2007
|
||||||
(unaudited)
|
|||||||
ASSETS
|
|||||||
Investments:
|
|||||||
Debt
securities, available-for-sale, at fair value
|
$
|
180,954
|
$
|
248,069
|
|||
Equity
securities, available-for-sale, at fair value
|
41,568
|
15,166
|
|||||
Short-term
investments, available-for-sale, at fair value
|
112,965
|
2,625
|
|||||
Total
investments
|
335,487
|
265,860
|
|||||
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
24,191
|
145,884
|
|||||
Restricted
cash and cash equivalents
|
8,963
|
16,043
|
|||||
Premiums
receivable
|
47,052
|
46,026
|
|||||
Accounts
receivable
|
5,243
|
5,219
|
|||||
Receivable
for securities
|
-
|
27,395
|
|||||
Prepaid
reinsurance premiums
|
2,636
|
942
|
|||||
Reinsurance
recoverable
|
11,525
|
4,952
|
|||||
Deferred
policy acquisition costs
|
20,149
|
19,757
|
|||||
Excess
of cost over fair value of net assets acquired
|
37,738
|
30,025
|
|||||
Intangible
assets
|
29,683
|
23,781
|
|||||
Current
federal income tax recoverable
|
1,586
|
-
|
|||||
Deferred
federal income taxes
|
4,371
|
275
|
|||||
Prepaid
expenses
|
941
|
1,240
|
|||||
Other
assets
|
20,115
|
19,583
|
|||||
Total
assets
|
$
|
549,680
|
$
|
606,982
|
|||
LIABILITIES
AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
|
|||||||
Liabilities:
|
|||||||
Notes
payable
|
$
|
61,760
|
$
|
60,814
|
|||
Structured
settlements
|
-
|
10,000
|
|||||
Reserves
for unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses
|
155,288
|
125,338
|
|||||
Unearned
premiums
|
105,293
|
102,998
|
|||||
Unearned
revenue
|
2,126
|
2,949
|
|||||
Accrued
agent profit sharing
|
1,935
|
2,844
|
|||||
Accrued
ceding commission payable
|
12,193
|
12,099
|
|||||
Pension
liability
|
1,017
|
1,669
|
|||||
Current
federal income tax
|
-
|
864
|
|||||
Payable
for securities
|
5,504
|
91,401
|
|||||
Accounts
payable and other accrued expenses
|
14,439
|
16,385
|
|||||
Total
liabilities
|
359,555
|
427,361
|
|||||
Commitments
and Contingencies (Note 17)
|
|||||||
Redeemable
minority interest
|
619
|
-
|
|||||
Stockholders'
equity:
|
|||||||
Common
stock, $.18 par value (authorized 33,333,333 shares in 2008 and 2007;
issued 20,816,782 in 2008 and 20,776,080 shares in 2007)
|
3,747
|
3,740
|
|||||
Capital
in excess of par value
|
119,649
|
118,459
|
|||||
Retained
earnings
|
74,649
|
59,343
|
|||||
Accumulated
other comprehensive loss
|
(8,462
|
)
|
(1,844
|
)
|
|||
Treasury
stock, at cost (7,828 shares in 2008 and 2007)
|
(77
|
)
|
(77
|
)
|
|||
Total
stockholders' equity
|
189,506
|
179,621
|
|||||
$
|
549,680
|
$
|
606,982
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part
of
the
consolidated financial statements
3
Hallmark
Financial Services, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated
Statements of Operations
(Unaudited)
($
in
thousands, except per share amounts)
Three Months Ended
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
September 30
|
|
September 30
|
|
||||||||
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|||||
Gross
premiums written
|
$
|
59,005
|
$
|
62,304
|
$
|
186,357
|
$
|
193,539
|
|||||
Ceded
premiums written
|
(2,493
|
)
|
(441
|
)
|
(6,503
|
)
|
(8,609
|
)
|
|||||
Net
premiums written
|
56,512
|
61,863
|
179,854
|
184,930
|
|||||||||
Change
in unearned premiums
|
2,416
|
(2,100
|
)
|
(1,918
|
)
|
(18,209
|
)
|
||||||
Net
premiums earned
|
58,928
|
59,763
|
177,936
|
166,721
|
|||||||||
Investment
income, net of expenses
|
4,100
|
3,774
|
11,682
|
9,811
|
|||||||||
Net
realized gains (impairments and realized losses)
|
(2,496
|
)
|
418
|
(1,405
|
)
|
1,299
|
|||||||
Finance
charges
|
1,307
|
1,206
|
3,894
|
3,477
|
|||||||||
Commission
and fees
|
3,127
|
7,280
|
16,280
|
23,344
|
|||||||||
Processing
and service fees
|
20
|
111
|
98
|
586
|
|||||||||
Other
income
|
3
|
4
|
9
|
12
|
|||||||||
Total
revenues
|
64,989
|
72,556
|
208,494
|
205,250
|
|||||||||
Losses
and loss adjustment expenses
|
38,981
|
36,723
|
110,514
|
99,620
|
|||||||||
Other
operating expenses
|
24,041
|
24,087
|
71,114
|
70,511
|
|||||||||
Interest
expense
|
1,186
|
1,026
|
3,557
|
2,608
|
|||||||||
Amortization
of intangible assets
|
620
|
573
|
1,766
|
1,719
|
|||||||||
Total
expenses
|
64,828
|
62,409
|
186,951
|
174,458
|
|||||||||
Income
before tax and minority interest
|
161
|
10,147
|
21,543
|
30,792
|
|||||||||
Income
tax expense (benefit)
|
(485
|
)
|
3,345
|
6,222
|
10,205
|
||||||||
Income
before minority interest
|
646
|
6,802
|
15,321
|
20,587
|
|||||||||
Minority
interest
|
15
|
-
|
15
|
-
|
|||||||||
Net
income
|
$
|
631
|
$
|
6,802
|
$
|
15,306
|
$
|
20,587
|
|||||
Common
stockholders net income per share:
|
|||||||||||||
Basic
|
$
|
0.03
|
$
|
0.33
|
$
|
0.74
|
$
|
0.99
|
|||||
Diluted
|
$
|
0.03
|
$
|
0.33
|
$
|
0.73
|
$
|
0.99
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part
of
the
consolidated financial statements
4
Hallmark
Financial Services, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated
Statement of Stockholders' Equity and Comprehensive Income
(Loss)
(Unaudited)
($
in
thousands)
Three Months Ended
|
Nine Months Ended
|
||||||||||||
September 30,
|
September 30,
|
||||||||||||
2008
|
2007
|
2008
|
2007
|
||||||||||
Common
Stock
|
|||||||||||||
Balance,
beginning of period
|
$
|
3,747
|
$
|
3,740
|
$
|
3,740
|
$
|
3,740
|
|||||
Issuance
of common stock upon option exercises
|
-
|
-
|
7
|
-
|
|||||||||
Balance,
end of period
|
3,747
|
3,740
|
3,747
|
3,740
|
|||||||||
Additional
Paid-In Capital
|
|||||||||||||
Balance,
beginning of period
|
119,369
|
118,085
|
118,459
|
117,932
|
|||||||||
Accretion
of redeemable minority interest to redemption value
|
(25
|
)
|
-
|
(25
|
)
|
-
|
|||||||
Equity
based compenstion
|
305
|
198
|
1,078
|
351
|
|||||||||
Exercise
of stock options
|
-
|
-
|
137
|
-
|
|||||||||
Balance,
end of period
|
119,649
|
118,283
|
119,649
|
118,283
|
|||||||||
Retained
Earnings
|
|||||||||||||
Balance,
beginning of period
|
74,018
|
45,265
|
59,343
|
31,480
|
|||||||||
Net
income
|
631
|
6,802
|
15,306
|
20,587
|
|||||||||
Balance,
end of period
|
74,649
|
52,067
|
74,649
|
52,067
|
|||||||||
Accumulated
Other Comprehensive Loss
|
|||||||||||||
Balance,
beginning of period
|
(4,756
|
)
|
(2,746
|
)
|
(1,844
|
)
|
(2,344
|
)
|
|||||
Additional
minimun pension liability, net of tax
|
10
|
33
|
31
|
97
|
|||||||||
Unrealized
gains (losses) on securities, net of tax
|
(3,716
|
)
|
1,006
|
(6,649
|
)
|
540
|
|||||||
Balance,
end of period
|
(8,462
|
)
|
(1,707
|
)
|
(8,462
|
)
|
(1,707
|
)
|
|||||
Treasury
Stock
|
|||||||||||||
Balance,
beginning of period
|
(77
|
)
|
(77
|
)
|
(77
|
)
|
(77
|
)
|
|||||
Acquisition
of treasury shares
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||
Balance,
end of period
|
(77
|
)
|
(77
|
)
|
(77
|
)
|
(77
|
)
|
|||||
Stockholders'
Equity
|
$
|
189,506
|
$
|
172,306
|
$
|
189,506
|
$
|
172,306
|
|||||
Net
income
|
$
|
631
|
$
|
6,802
|
$
|
15,306
|
$
|
20,587
|
|||||
Additional
minimum pension liablilty, net of tax
|
10
|
33
|
31
|
97
|
|||||||||
Unrealized
gains (losses) on securities, net of tax
|
(3,716
|
)
|
1,006
|
(6,649
|
)
|
540
|
|||||||
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
|
$
|
(3,075
|
)
|
$
|
7,841
|
$
|
8,688
|
$
|
21,224
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part
of
the
consolidated financial statements
5
Hallmark
Financial Services, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated
Statement of Cash Flows
(Unaudited)
($
in
thousands)
Nine Months Ended
|
|||||||
September 30
|
|||||||
2008
|
2007
|
||||||
Cash
flows from operating activities:
|
|||||||
Net
income
|
$
|
15,306
|
$
|
20,587
|
|||
Adjustments
to reconcile net income to cash provided by operating
activites:
|
|||||||
Depreciation
and amortization expense
|
2,311
|
2,344
|
|||||
Minority
interest
|
15
|
-
|
|||||
Amortization
of discount on structured settlement
|
-
|
310
|
|||||
Deferred
federal income tax benefit
|
(1,849
|
)
|
(1,170
|
)
|
|||
Realized
(gain) loss on investments and impairment losses
|
1,405
|
(1,299
|
)
|
||||
Change
in prepaid reinsurance premiums
|
(1,694
|
)
|
137
|
||||
Change
in prepaid commissions
|
-
|
487
|
|||||
Change
in premiums receivable
|
(1,026
|
)
|
(8,492
|
)
|
|||
Change
in accounts receivable
|
(24
|
)
|
1,604
|
||||
Change
in deferred policy acquisition costs
|
(392
|
)
|
(3,631
|
)
|
|||
Change
in unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses
|
29,950
|
38,572
|
|||||
Change
in unearned premiums
|
2,295
|
16,759
|
|||||
Change
in unearned revenue
|
(823
|
)
|
(2,378
|
)
|
|||
Change
in accrued agent profit sharing
|
(909
|
)
|
206
|
||||
Change
in reinsurance recoverable
|
(6,573
|
)
|
149
|
||||
Change
in reinsurance payable
|
-
|
(1,060
|
)
|
||||
Change
in current federal income tax payable
|
(2,451
|
)
|
(1,678
|
)
|
|||
Change
in accrued ceding commission payable
|
94
|
3,096
|
|||||
Change
in all other liabilities
|
(2,599
|
)
|
3,059
|
||||
Change
in all other assets
|
4,122
|
(5,835
|
)
|
||||
Net
cash provided by operating activities
|
37,158
|
61,767
|
|||||
Cash
flows from investing activities:
|
|||||||
Purchases
of property and equipment
|
(477
|
)
|
(367
|
)
|
|||
Acquisition
of subsidiaries, net of cash acquired
|
(14,799
|
)
|
-
|
||||
Change
in restricted cash
|
7,080
|
12,244
|
|||||
Purchases
of debt and equity securities
|
(258,465
|
)
|
(187,256
|
)
|
|||
Maturities
and redemptions of investment securities
|
227,061
|
115,288
|
|||||
Net
purchases of short-term investments
|
(110,340
|
)
|
(30,713
|
)
|
|||
Net
cash (used in) investing activities
|
(149,940
|
)
|
(90,804
|
)
|
|||
Cash
flows from financing activities:
|
|||||||
Proceeds
from exercise of employee stock options
|
143
|
-
|
|||||
Net
borrowings (repayment) of notes payable
|
946
|
(856
|
)
|
||||
Payment
of structured settlement
|
(10,000
|
)
|
(15,000
|
)
|
|||
Proceeds
from issuance of trust preferred securities
|
-
|
25,774
|
|||||
Debt
issuance costs
|
-
|
(674
|
)
|
||||
Net
cash (used in) provided by financing activities
|
(8,911
|
)
|
9,244
|
||||
Decrease
in cash and cash equivalents
|
(121,693
|
)
|
(19,793
|
)
|
|||
Cash
and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
145,884
|
81,474
|
|||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at end of period
|
$
|
24,191
|
$
|
61,681
|
|||
Supplemental
Cash Flow Information:
|
|||||||
Interest
paid
|
$
|
3,576
|
$
|
2,184
|
|||
Taxes
paid
|
$
|
10,521
|
$
|
13,053
|
|||
Supplemental
schedule of non-cash investing activities:
|
|||||||
Change
in receivable for securities related to investment disposals that
settled
after the balance sheet date
|
$
|
27,395
|
$
|
(14
|
)
|
||
Change
in payable for securities related to investment purchases that settled
after the balance sheet date
|
$
|
(85,897
|
)
|
$
|
8,878
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part
of
the
consolidated financial statements
6
Hallmark
Financial Services, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
1.
General
Hallmark
Financial Services, Inc. (“Hallmark” and, together with subsidiaries, “we,” “us”
or “our”) is an insurance holding company which, through its subsidiaries,
engages in the sale of property/casualty insurance products to businesses and
individuals. Our business involves marketing, distributing, underwriting and
servicing commercial insurance, non-standard automobile insurance and general
aviation insurance, as well as providing other insurance related services.
Our
business is geographically concentrated in the south central and northwest
regions of the United States, except for our general aviation business which
is
written on a national basis.
We
pursue
our business activities through subsidiaries whose operations are organized
into
five operating units which are supported by our three insurance company
subsidiaries. Our HGA Operating Unit handles standard lines commercial insurance
products and services and is comprised of American Hallmark Insurance Services,
Inc. and Effective Claims Management, Inc. Our TGA Operating Unit handles
primarily excess and surplus lines commercial insurance products and services
and is comprised of TGA Insurance Managers, Inc., Pan American Acceptance
Corporation (“PAAC”) and TGA Special Risk, Inc. Our Aerospace Operating Unit
handles general aviation insurance products and services and is comprised of
Aerospace Insurance Managers, Inc., Aerospace Special Risk, Inc. and Aerospace
Claims Management Group, Inc. Our Heath XS Operating Unit handles excess
commercial automobile and commercial umbrella risks on both an admitted and
non-admitted basis and is comprised of Heath XS, LLC and Hardscrabble Data
Solutions, LLC (collectively, “Heath Group”). Our Phoenix Operating Unit handles
non-standard personal automobile insurance products and services and is
comprised solely of American Hallmark General Agency, Inc. (which does business
as Hallmark Insurance Company).
These
five operating units are segregated into three reportable industry segments
for
financial accounting purposes. The Standard Commercial Segment presently
consists solely of the HGA Operating Unit and the Personal Segment presently
consists solely of our Phoenix Operating Unit. The Specialty Commercial Segment
includes our TGA Operating Unit, Aerospace Operating Unit, and Heath XS
Operating Unit.
2.
Basis of Presentation
Our
unaudited consolidated financial statements included herein have been prepared
in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) and
include our accounts and the accounts of our subsidiaries. All significant
intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial
statements prepared in accordance with GAAP have been condensed or omitted
pursuant to rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission
(“SEC”) for interim financial reporting. These financial statements should be
read in conjunction with our audited financial statements for the year ended
December 31, 2007 included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the
SEC.
The
interim financial data as of September 30, 2008 and 2007 is unaudited. However,
in the opinion of management, the interim data includes all adjustments,
consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair statement
of the results for the interim periods. The results of operations for the period
ended September 30, 2008 are not necessarily indicative of the operating results
to be expected for the full year.
7
Redeemable minority
interest
We
are
accreting the redeemable minority interest to its redemption value from the
date
of issuance to the earliest determinable redemption date, August 29, 2012,
using
the interest method. Changes in redemption value are considered a change in
accounting estimate. We follow the two class method of computing earnings per
share. We treat only the portion of the periodic adjustment to the redeemable
minority interest carrying amount that reflects a redemption in excess of fair
value as being akin to an actual dividend. (See Note 3, “Business
Combinations.”)
Reclassification
Certain
previously reported amounts have been reclassified in order to conform to our
current year presentation. Such reclassification had no effect on net income
or
stockholders’ equity.
Immaterial
Correction of an Error
We
maintain catastrophe reinsurance for business produced by both our HGA and
TGA
Operating Units. Prior to July 1, 2007, the premium for our catastrophe
reinsurance was based on all business produced by both operating units.
Effective July 1, 2007, the premium for our catastrophe reinsurance is based
only on business produced in Texas. However, in error we continued to record
ceded premium for this coverage based on all business produced by the HGA and
TGA Operating Units. This understated our earned premium for each quarter since
July 1, 2007 through June 30, 2008.
We
are
correcting our prior period’s financial statements and notes to reflect the
reduction of ceded premium. Because the error was not material to any prior
year
financial statements, the corrections to prior periods will be presented in
future filings, pursuant to SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 108, “Considering
the Effects of Prior Year Misstatements when Quantifying Misstatements in
Current Year Financial Statements.” Financial statements for the year ended
December 31, 2007 will be revised in the December 31, 2008 Annual Report on
Form
10-K.
The
following table presents the effect of the correction on our previously reported
consolidated statements of operations for the three months ended September
30,
2007, December 31, 2007, March 31, 2008 and June 30, 2008.
8
For the Three Months Ended
|
|||||||||||||
September 30,
|
December 31,
|
March 31,
|
June 30,
|
||||||||||
2007
|
2007
|
2008
|
2008
|
||||||||||
As
previously reported:
|
|||||||||||||
Ceded
premiums written
|
$
|
(779
|
)
|
$
|
(2,382
|
)
|
$
|
(2,332
|
)
|
$
|
(2,327
|
)
|
|
Net
premiums written
|
61,525
|
53,551
|
61,905
|
60,788
|
|||||||||
Net
premiums earned
|
59,425
|
58,920
|
58,916
|
59,443
|
|||||||||
Total
revenues
|
72,218
|
69,586
|
71,193
|
71,663
|
|||||||||
Income
before tax
|
9,809
|
10,647
|
10,466
|
10,267
|
|||||||||
Income
tax expense
|
3,227
|
3,585
|
3,414
|
3,066
|
|||||||||
Net
income
|
$
|
6,582
|
$
|
7,062
|
$
|
7,052
|
$
|
7,201
|
|||||
Common
stockholders net income per share:
|
|||||||||||||
Basic
|
$
|
0.32
|
$
|
0.34
|
$
|
0.34
|
$
|
0.35
|
|||||
Diluted
|
$
|
0.32
|
$
|
0.34
|
$
|
0.34
|
$
|
0.34
|
|||||
Adjustments:
|
|||||||||||||
Ceded
premiums written
|
$
|
338
|
$
|
330
|
$
|
328
|
$
|
321
|
|||||
Income
tax expense
|
118
|
116
|
115
|
112
|
|||||||||
Net
income impact
|
$
|
220
|
$
|
214
|
$
|
213
|
$
|
209
|
|||||
As
revised:
|
|||||||||||||
Ceded
premiums written
|
$
|
(441
|
)
|
$
|
(2,052
|
)
|
$
|
(2,004
|
)
|
$
|
(2,006
|
)
|
|
Net
premiums written
|
61,863
|
53,881
|
62,233
|
61,109
|
|||||||||
Net
premiums earned
|
59,763
|
59,250
|
59,244
|
59,764
|
|||||||||
Total
revenues
|
72,556
|
69,916
|
71,521
|
71,984
|
|||||||||
Income
before tax
|
10,147
|
10,977
|
10,794
|
10,588
|
|||||||||
Income
tax expense
|
3,345
|
3,701
|
3,529
|
3,178
|
|||||||||
Net
income
|
$
|
6,802
|
$
|
7,276
|
$
|
7,265
|
$
|
7,410
|
|||||
Common
stockholders net income per share:
|
|||||||||||||
Basic
|
$
|
0.33
|
$
|
0.35
|
$
|
0.35
|
$
|
0.36
|
|||||
Diluted
|
$
|
0.33
|
$
|
0.35
|
$
|
0.35
|
$
|
0.35
|
The
following table presents the effect of the correction on our previously reported
consolidated statements of operations for the nine months ended September 30,
2007, the year ended December 31, 2007, and the six months ended June 30,
2008.
9
For the Nine
|
For the Year
|
For the Six
|
||||||||
Months Ended
|
Ended
|
Months Ended
|
||||||||
September 30,
|
December 31,
|
June
30,
|
||||||||
2007
|
2007
|
2008
|
||||||||
As
previously reported:
|
||||||||||
Ceded
premiums written
|
$
|
(8,947
|
)
|
$
|
(11,329
|
)
|
$
|
(4,659
|
)
|
|
Net
premiums written
|
184,592
|
238,143
|
122,693
|
|||||||
Net
premiums earned
|
166,383
|
225,303
|
118,359
|
|||||||
Total
revenues
|
204,912
|
274,498
|
142,856
|
|||||||
Income
before tax
|
30,454
|
41,101
|
20,733
|
|||||||
Income
tax expense
|
10,087
|
13,672
|
6,480
|
|||||||
Net
income
|
$
|
20,367
|
$
|
27,429
|
$
|
14,253
|
||||
Common
stockholders net income per share:
|
||||||||||
Basic
|
$
|
0.98
|
$
|
1.32
|
$
|
0.69
|
||||
Diluted
|
$
|
0.98
|
$
|
1.32
|
$
|
0.68
|
||||
Adjustments:
|
||||||||||
Ceded
premiums written
|
$
|
338
|
$
|
668
|
$
|
649
|
||||
Income
tax expense
|
118
|
234
|
227
|
|||||||
Net
income impact
|
$
|
220
|
$
|
434
|
$
|
422
|
||||
As
revised:
|
||||||||||
Ceded
premiums written
|
$
|
(8,609
|
)
|
$
|
(10,661
|
)
|
$
|
(4,010
|
)
|
|
Net
premiums written
|
184,930
|
238,811
|
123,342
|
|||||||
Net
premiums earned
|
166,721
|
225,971
|
119,008
|
|||||||
Total
revenues
|
205,250
|
275,166
|
143,505
|
|||||||
Income
before tax
|
30,792
|
41,769
|
21,382
|
|||||||
Income
tax expense
|
10,205
|
13,906
|
6,707
|
|||||||
Net
income
|
$
|
20,587
|
$
|
27,863
|
$
|
14,675
|
||||
Common
stockholders net income per share:
|
||||||||||
Basic
|
$
|
0.99
|
$
|
1.34
|
$
|
0.71
|
||||
Diluted
|
$
|
0.99
|
$
|
1.34
|
$
|
0.70
|
The
following table presents the effect of the correction on our previously reported
consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2007.
As previously
|
||||||||||
reported
|
Adjustment
|
As revised
|
||||||||
Balances
as of December 31, 2007
|
||||||||||
Prepaid
reinsurance premiums
|
$
|
274
|
$
|
668
|
$
|
942
|
||||
Total
assets
|
606,314
|
668
|
606,982
|
|||||||
Current
federal income tax payable
|
630
|
234
|
864
|
|||||||
Total
liabilities
|
427,127
|
234
|
427,361
|
|||||||
Retained
earnings
|
58,909
|
434
|
59,343
|
|||||||
Total
stockholders' equity
|
179,187
|
434
|
179,621
|
10
The
following table presents the effect of the correction on our previously reported
consolidated statements of cash flows for the nine months ended September 30,
2007, the year ended December 31, 2007, the three months ended March 31, 2008,
and the six months ended June 30, 2008.
For the Nine
|
For the Year
|
For the Three
|
For the Six
|
||||||||||
Months Ended
|
Ended
|
Months Ended
|
Months Ended
|
||||||||||
September 30,
|
December 31,
|
March 31,
|
June 30,
|
||||||||||
2007
|
2007
|
2008
|
2008
|
||||||||||
As
previously reported:
|
|||||||||||||
Net
income
|
$
|
20,367
|
$
|
27,429
|
$
|
7,052
|
$
|
14,253
|
|||||
Change
in prepaid reinsurance premiums
|
475
|
1,355
|
(1,923
|
)
|
(408
|
)
|
|||||||
Change
in current federal income tax payable
|
(1,796
|
)
|
(1,502
|
)
|
2,788
|
(1,354
|
)
|
||||||
Net
cash provided by operating activities
|
61,767
|
80,337
|
12,388
|
29,749
|
|||||||||
Adjustments:
|
|||||||||||||
Net
income
|
$
|
220
|
$
|
434
|
$
|
213
|
$
|
422
|
|||||
Change
in prepaid reinsurance premiums
|
(338
|
)
|
(668
|
)
|
(328
|
)
|
(649
|
)
|
|||||
Change
in current federal income tax payable
|
118
|
234
|
115
|
227
|
|||||||||
Net
cash provided by operating activities
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||
As
revised:
|
|||||||||||||
Net
income
|
$
|
20,587
|
$
|
27,863
|
$
|
7,265
|
$
|
14,675
|
|||||
Change
in prepaid reinsurance premiums
|
137
|
687
|
(2,251
|
)
|
(1,057
|
)
|
|||||||
Change
in current federal income tax payable
|
(1,678
|
)
|
(1,268
|
)
|
2,903
|
(1,127
|
)
|
||||||
Net
cash provided by operating activities
|
61,767
|
80,337
|
12,388
|
29,749
|
Use
of Estimates in the Preparation of the Financial
Statements
Our
preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires us to
make
estimates and assumptions that affect our reported amounts of assets and
liabilities and our disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the
date
of our financial statements, as well as our reported amounts of revenues and
expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ materially
from those estimates.
Recently
Issued Accounting Standards
In
September 2005, the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants issued
Statement of Position 05-1, “Accounting by Insurance Enterprises for Deferred
Acquisition Costs in Connection With Modifications or Exchanges of Insurance
Contracts” (“SOP 05-01”). This Statement provides guidance on accounting for
deferred acquisition costs on internal replacements of insurance and investment
contracts other than those specifically described in Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 97, “Accounting and Reporting by Insurance Enterprises
for Certain Long-Duration Contracts and for Realized Gains and Losses from
the
Sale of Investments,” previously issued by the Financial Accounting Standards
Board (“FASB”). SOP 05-01 is effective for internal replacements occurring in
fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006. The adoption of SOP 05-01 had
no
material impact on our financial condition or results of
operations.
11
In
June
2006, FASB Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes -
An Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109” (“FIN 48”), was issued. FIN 48
clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in a
company’s financial statements in accordance with FASB Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes”. FIN 48 also
prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial
statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to
be
taken in a tax return, as well as providing guidance on derecognition,
classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods,
disclosure and transition. FIN 48 is effective for fiscal years beginning after
December 15, 2006 with earlier application permitted as long as the company
has
not yet issued financial statements, including interim financial statements,
in
the period of adoption. We adopted the provisions of FIN 48 on January 1, 2007.
Since we had no unrecognized tax benefits, we recognized no additional liability
or reduction in deferred tax asset as a result of the adoption of FIN 48. We
are
no longer subject to U. S. federal, state, local or non-U.S. income tax
examinations by tax authorities for years prior to 2003.
In
September 2006, FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No.
157,
“Fair Value Measurements” (“SFAS 157”). SFAS 157 establishes a separate
framework for determining fair values of assets and liabilities that are
required by other authoritative GAAP pronouncements to be measured at fair
value. In addition, SFAS 157 incorporates and clarifies the guidance in FASB
Concepts Statement 7 regarding the use of present value techniques in measuring
fair value. SFAS 157 does not require any new fair value measurements. SFAS
157
is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after
November 15, 2007. The adoption of SFAS 157 had no impact on our financial
statements or results of operations but did require additional disclosures.
(See
Note 5, “Fair Value”).
In
February 2007, FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No.
159,
“The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Liabilities” (“SFAS 159”). SFAS
159 permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain
other items at fair value with changes in fair value included in current
earnings. The election is made on specified election dates, can be made on
an
instrument-by- instrument basis, and is irrevocable. SFAS 159 is effective
for
financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007.
The adoption of SFAS 159 had no impact on our financial statements or results
of
operations as we did not elect to apply SFAS 159 to any eligible
items.
In
December 2007, the FASB issued Revised Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 141R, “Business Combinations” (“SFAS 141R”), a replacement of
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 141, “Business Combinations”.
SFAS 141R provides revised guidance on how an acquirer recognizes and measures
in its financial statements the identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities
assumed, and any noncontrolling interest in the acquiree. In addition, it
provides revised guidance on the recognition and measurement of goodwill
acquired in the business combination. SFAS 141R also provides guidance specific
to the recognition, classification, and measurement of assets and liabilities
related to insurance and reinsurance contracts acquired in a business
combination. SFAS 141R applies to business combinations for acquisitions
occurring on or after January 1, 2009. We do not expect the provisions of SFAS
141R to have a material effect on our results of operations or liquidity.
However, SFAS 141R will impact the accounting for any future
acquisitions.
In
December 2007, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No.
160, “Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements—an amendment
of Accounting Research Bulletin No. 51” (“SFAS 160”). SFAS 160 amends Accounting
Research Bulletin No. 51 to establish accounting and reporting standards for
the
noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a
subsidiary. In addition, it clarifies that a noncontrolling interest in a
subsidiary is an ownership interest in the consolidated entity that should
be
reported as a component of equity in the consolidated financial statements.
SFAS
160 is effective on a prospective basis beginning January 1, 2009, except for
the presentation and disclosure requirements which are applied on a
retrospective basis for all periods presented. We are currently assessing the
impact of SFAS 160 on our consolidated financial statements.
12
3.
Business Combinations
We
account for business combinations using the purchase method of accounting.
The
cost of an acquired entity is allocated to the assets acquired (including
identified intangible assets) and liabilities assumed based on their estimated
fair values. The excess of the cost of an acquired entity over the net amounts
assigned to assets acquired and liabilities assumed is an asset referred to
as
“Excess of cost over fair value of net assets acquired.” Indirect and general
expenses related to business combinations are expensed as incurred.
On
August
29, 2008, we acquired 80% of the issued and outstanding membership interests
in
Heath Group for cash consideration of $15 million plus fair value of a put
option of $539 thousand included as redeemable minority interest. (See Note
1,
“General - Redeemable Minority Interest.”) We have the right to purchase the
remaining 20% membership interests in Heath Group and have granted to an
affiliate of the seller the right to require us to purchase such remaining
interests (the “Put/Call Option”). The Put/Call Option becomes exercisable by
either party upon the earlier of August 29, 2012, the termination of the
employment of the seller by the Heath Group or a change in control of Hallmark.
The Put/Call option expires on August 29, 2018. If the Put/Call Option is
exercised, we will have the right or obligation to purchase the remaining
membership interests in the Heath Group for an amount equal to 20% of nine
times
the average pre-tax income for the previous 12 fiscal quarters. We estimate
the
ultimate redemption value of the Put/Call option to be $4.8 million at September
30, 2008.
The
fair
value of the amortizable intangible assets acquired and respective amortization
periods are as follows ($ in thousands):
Tradename
|
$
|
757
|
15
years
|
||||
Non-compete
agreement
|
$
|
526
|
6
years
|
||||
Agency
relationships
|
$
|
6,385
|
15
years
|
The
Heath
Group is an underwriting organization that produces lower hazard, middle market,
excess commercial automobile and commercial umbrella insurance policies on
both
an admitted and non-admitted basis through a network of independent wholesale
agencies throughout the United States.
4.
Supplemental Cash Flow Information
Effective
August 29, 2008, we acquired the Heath Group. (See Note 3, “Business
Combinations.”) In conjunction with the acquisition, cash and cash equivalents
were used in the acquisitions as follows (in thousands):
13
Fair
value of tangible assets excluding cash and cash
equivalents
|
$
|
(3
|
)
|
|
Fair
value of intangible assets acquired
|
15,381
|
|||
Redeemable
minority interest assumed
|
(579
|
)
|
||
Cash
and cash equivalents used in acquisitions,
|
||||
net
of $201 thousand cash and cash equivalents acquired
|
$
|
14,799
|
The
purchase price was preliminarily allocated to the assets acquired and the
liabilities assumed based on their estimated fair values at the purchase date
as
summarized above. The final allocation of the purchase price will be finalized
in the fourth quarter of 2008 upon completing certain Heath Group tax
filings impacting the tax basis of assets and liabilities acquired.
5.
Fair Value
SFAS 157
defines fair value, establishes a consistent framework for measuring fair value
and expands disclosure requirements about fair value measurements.
SFAS 157, among other things, requires us to maximize the use of observable
inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value.
In
addition, SFAS 157 precludes the use of block discounts when measuring the
fair value of instruments traded in an active market, which were previously
applied to large holdings of publicly traded equity securities. It also requires
recognition of trade-date gains related to certain derivative transactions
whose
fair value has been determined using unobservable market inputs. This guidance
supersedes the guidance in Emerging Issues Task Force Issue No. 02-3,
”Issues Involved in Accounting for Derivative Contracts Held for Trading
Purposes and Contracts Involved in Energy Trading and Risk Management
Activities”, which prohibited the recognition of trade-date gains for such
derivative transactions when determining the fair value of instruments not
traded in an active market.
Effective
January 1, 2008, we determine the fair value of our financial instruments based
on the fair value hierarchy established in SFAS 157. In accordance with
SFAS 157, we utilize the following fair value hierarchy:
·
|
Level
1: quoted prices in active markets for identical assets;
|
·
|
Level
2: inputs to the valuation methodology include quoted prices for
similar
assets and liabilities in active markets, inputs of identical assets
for
less active markets, and inputs that are observable for the asset
or
liability, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full
term
of the instrument; and
|
·
|
Level
3: inputs to the valuation methodology that are unobservable for
the asset
or liability.
|
This
hierarchy requires the use of observable market data when available.
Under
SFAS 157, we determine fair value based on the price that would be received
for
an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between
market participants on the measurement date. It is our policy to maximize the
use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when
developing fair value measurements, in accordance with the fair value hierarchy
described above. Fair value measurements for assets and liabilities where there
exists limited or no observable market data are calculated based upon our
pricing policy, the economic and competitive environment, the characteristics
of
the asset or liability and other factors as appropriate. These estimated fair
values may not be realized upon actual sale or immediate settlement of the
asset
or liability.
14
Where
quoted prices are available on active exchanges for identical instruments,
investment securities are classified within Level 1 of the valuation hierarchy.
Level 1 investment securities include common and preferred stock. If quoted
prices are not available from active exchanges for identical instruments, then
fair values are estimated using quoted prices from less active markets, quoted
prices of securities with similar characteristics or by pricing models utilizing
other significant observable inputs. Examples of such instruments, which would
generally be classified within Level 2 of the valuation hierarchy, include
corporate bonds, municipal bonds and U.S. Treasury securities. In cases where
there is limited activity or less transparency around inputs to the valuation,
investment securities are classified within Level 3 of the valuation hierarchy.
Level 3 investments are valued based on the best available data in order to
approximate fair value. This data may be internally developed and consider
risk
premiums that a market participant would require. Investment securities
classified within Level 3 include other less liquid investment
securities.
Quoted Prices in
|
Other
|
||||||||||||
Active Markets for
|
Observable
|
Unobservable
|
|||||||||||
Identical Assets
|
Inputs
|
Inputs
|
|||||||||||
(Level 1)
|
(Level 2)
|
(Level 3)
|
Total
|
||||||||||
Debt
securities
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
180,954
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
180,954
|
|||||
Equity
securities
|
41,568
|
-
|
-
|
41,568
|
|||||||||
Short-term
investments
|
335
|
112,630
|
-
|
112,965
|
|||||||||
Total
|
$
|
41,903
|
$
|
293,584
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
335,487
|
The
following table summarizes the changes in fair value for all financial assets
measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable
inputs (Level 3) during the nine months ended September 30, 2008 (in thousands).
Beginning
balance as of January 1, 2008
|
$
|
4,000
|
||
Purchases,
issuances, sales and settlements
|
(4,000
|
)
|
||
Total
realized/unrealized gains/(losses) included in net income
|
-
|
|||
Net
gains/(losses) included on other comprehensive income
|
-
|
|||
Transfers
in and/or out of Level 3
|
-
|
|||
Ending
balance as of September 30, 2008
|
$
|
-
|
15
6.
Investments
We
complete a detailed analysis each quarter to assess whether any decline in
the
fair value of any investment below cost is deemed other-than-temporary. All
securities with an unrealized loss are reviewed. Unless other factors cause
us
to reach a contrary conclusion, investments with a fair market value
significantly less than cost for more than 180 days are deemed to have a decline
in value that is other-than-temporary. A decline in value that is considered
to
be other-than-temporary is charged to earnings based on the fair value of the
security at the time of assessment, resulting in a new cost basis for the
security. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, we recognized
approximately $3.2 million and $3.7 million of other than temporary impairments
on investments.
The
following schedules summarize the gross unrealized losses showing the length
of
time that investments have been continuously in an unrealized loss position
as
of September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007:
As of September 30, 2008
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Less than 12 months
|
12 months or longer
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||||||
Unrealized
|
Unrealized
|
Unrealized
|
|||||||||||||||||
Fair Value
|
Losses
|
Fair Value
|
Losses
|
Fair Value
|
Losses
|
||||||||||||||
Corporate
debt securities
|
$
|
25,169
|
$
|
(1,063
|
)
|
$
|
16,860
|
$
|
(2,778
|
)
|
$
|
42,029
|
$
|
(3,841
|
)
|
||||
Municipal
bonds
|
79,655
|
(3,216
|
)
|
7,488
|
(232
|
)
|
87,143
|
(3,448
|
)
|
||||||||||
Equity
securities
|
29,181
|
(3,976
|
)
|
-
|
-
|
29,181
|
(3,976
|
)
|
|||||||||||
Short
term securities
|
354
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
354
|
-
|
|||||||||||||
Total
|
$
|
134,359
|
$
|
(8,255
|
)
|
$
|
24,348
|
$
|
(3,010
|
)
|
$
|
158,707
|
$
|
(11,265
|
)
|
As of December 31, 2007
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Less than 12 months
|
12 months or longer
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||||||
Unrealized
|
Unrealized
|
Unrealized
|
|||||||||||||||||
Fair Value
|
Losses
|
Fair Value
|
Losses
|
Fair Value
|
Losses
|
||||||||||||||
Corporate
debt securities
|
$
|
19,021
|
$
|
(840
|
)
|
$
|
18,329
|
$
|
(896
|
)
|
$
|
37,350
|
$
|
(1,736
|
)
|
||||
Municipal
bonds
|
24,392
|
(122
|
)
|
7,780
|
(130
|
)
|
32,172
|
(252
|
)
|
||||||||||
Equity
securities
|
6,954
|
(318
|
)
|
-
|
-
|
6,954
|
(318
|
)
|
|||||||||||
Short
term securities
|
352
|
(1
|
)
|
-
|
-
|
352
|
(1
|
)
|
|||||||||||
Total
|
$
|
50,719
|
$
|
(1,281
|
)
|
$
|
26,109
|
$
|
(1,026
|
)
|
$
|
76,828
|
$
|
(2,307
|
)
|
Of
the
gross unrealized loss at September 30, 2008, $3.0 million is more than twelve
months old, consisting of 17 bond positions. Of the gross unrealized loss at
December 31, 2007, $1.0 million is more than twelve months old, consisting
of 22
bond positions. We consider these losses as a temporary decline in value as
they
are predominately on bonds where we believe we have the ability to hold our
positions until maturity and the debt issuers have the ability to make all
contractual payments. We see no other indications that the decline in values
of
these securities is other than temporary.
Based
on
evidence gathered through our normal credit surveillance process, we presently
expect that all debt securities held in our investment portfolio will be paid
in
accordance with their contractual terms. Nonetheless, it is at least reasonably
possible that the performance of certain issuers of these debt securities will
be worse than currently expected resulting in additional future write-downs
within our portfolio of debt securities.
Also,
as
a result of the challenging market conditions, including expected further
weakening in the economic environment subsequent to September 30, 2008, we
have
experienced continued volatility in the valuation of our equity securities
including increases in our unrealized investment losses. We expect the
volatility in the valuation of our equity securities to continue in the
foreseable future. This volatility may lead to additional impairments on
our
equity securities portfolio or changes regarding retention strategies for
certain equity securities.
16
7.
Pledged Investments
We
have
certain of our securities pledged for the benefit of various state insurance
departments and reinsurers. These securities are included with our
available-for-sale debt securities because we have the ability to trade these
securities. We retain the interest earned on these securities. These securities
had a carrying value of $13.9 million at September 30, 2008 and a carrying
value
of $18.5 million at December 31, 2007.
8.
Share-Based Payment Arrangements
Our
2005
Long Term Incentive Plan (“2005 LTIP”) is a stock compensation plan for key
employees and non-employee directors that was approved by the shareholders
on
May 26, 2005. There are 1,500,000 shares authorized for issuance under the
2005
LTIP. Our 1994 Key Employee Long Term Incentive Plan (the “1994 Employee Plan”)
and 1994 Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan (the “1994 Director Plan”) both
expired in 2004 but have unexercised options outstanding.
As
of
September 30, 2008, there were incentive stock options to purchase 927,499
shares of our common stock outstanding and non-qualified stock options to
purchase 60,000 shares of our common stock outstanding under the 2005 LTIP,
leaving 512,501 shares reserved for future issuance. As of September 30, 2008,
there were incentive stock options to purchase 52,299 shares outstanding under
the 1994 Employee Plan and non-qualified stock options to purchase 20,834 shares
outstanding under the 1994 Director Plan. In addition, as of September 30,
2008,
there were outstanding non-qualified stock options to purchase 16,666 shares
of
our common stock granted to certain non-employee directors outside the 1994
Director Plan in lieu of fees for service on our board of directors in 1999.
The
exercise price of all such outstanding stock options is equal to the fair market
value of our common stock on the date of grant.
Options
granted under the 1994 Employee Plan prior to October 31, 2003, vest 40% six
months from the date of grant and an additional 20% on each of the first three
anniversary dates of the grant and terminate ten years from the date of grant.
Incentive stock options granted under the 2005 LTIP and the 1994 Employee Plan
after October 31, 2003, vest 10%, 20%, 30% and 40% on the first, second, third
and fourth anniversary dates of the grant, respectively, and terminate five
to
ten years from the date of grant. Non-qualified stock options granted under
the
2005 LTIP vest 100% six months after the date of grant and terminate ten years
from the date of grant. All non-qualified stock options granted under the 1994
Director Plan vested 40% six months from the date of grant and an additional
10%
on each of the first six anniversary dates of the grant and terminate ten years
from the date of grant. The options granted to non-employee directors outside
the 1994 Director Plan fully vested six months after the date of grant and
terminate ten years from the date of grant.
During
the first quarter of 2008, we determined our previous recognition of
compensation expense on share based arrangements did not conform to GAAP. As
a
result, we corrected our calculation to properly record compensation expense
on
a straight line basis over the requisite service period for the entire award
in
accordance with SFAS No. 123R “Share-Based Payment”. The cumulative impact of
this correction was recorded during the first quarter of 2008 resulting in
additional compensation expense of approximately $354 thousand which is not
considered to have a material impact on our financial position or results of
operations.
17
A
summary
of the status of our stock options as of September 30, 2008 and changes during
the nine-months then ended is presented below:
Average
|
Contractual
|
Intrinsic
|
|||||||||||
Number of
|
Exercise
|
Term
|
Value
|
||||||||||
Shares
|
Price
|
(Years)
|
($000)
|
||||||||||
Outstanding
at January 1, 2008
|
848,000
|
$
|
10.41
|
||||||||||
Granted
|
270,000
|
$
|
11.46
|
||||||||||
Exercised
|
(40,702
|
)
|
$
|
3.54
|
|||||||||
Forfeited
or expired
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
||||||||||
Outstanding
at September 30, 2008
|
1,077,298
|
$
|
10.93
|
8.0
|
$
|
682
|
|||||||
Exercisable
at September 30, 2008
|
263,549
|
$
|
8.19
|
5.5
|
$
|
614
|
The
following table details the intrinsic value of options exercised, total cost
of
share-based payments charged against income before income tax benefit and the
amount of related income tax benefit recognized in income for the periods
indicated (in thousands):
Three Months Ended
|
Nine Months Ended
|
||||||||||||
September 30,
|
September 30,
|
||||||||||||
2008
|
2007
|
2008
|
2007
|
||||||||||
Intrinsic
value of options exercised
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
337
|
$
|
-
|
|||||
Cost
of share-based payments (non-cash)
|
$
|
305
|
$
|
198
|
$
|
1,078
|
$
|
351
|
|||||
Income
tax benefit of share-based payments recognized in income
|
$
|
107
|
$
|
69
|
$
|
377
|
$
|
123
|
As
of
September 30, 2008 there was $2.8 million of total unrecognized compensation
cost related to non-vested share-based compensation arrangements granted under
our plans, of which $0.3 million is expected to be recognized in the remainder
of 2008, $1.0 million is expected to be recognized in 2009, $0.9 million is
expected to be recognized in 2010, $0.5 million is expected to be recognized
in
2011 and $0.1 million is expected to be recognized in 2012.
The
fair
value of each stock option granted is estimated on the date of grant using
the
Black-Scholes option pricing model. Expected volatilities are based on the
historical volatility of similar companies’ common stock for a period equal to
the expected term. The risk- free interest rates for periods within the
contractual term of the options are based on rates for U.S. Treasury Notes
with
maturity dates corresponding to the options’ expected lives on the dates of
grant. Expected term is determined based on the simplified method as we do
not
have sufficient historical exercise data to provide a basis for estimating
the
expected term.
18
The
following table details the weighted average grant date fair value and related
assumptions for the periods indicated:
Three Months Ended
|
Nine Months Ended
|
||||||||||||
September 30,
|
September 30,
|
||||||||||||
2008
|
2007
|
2008
|
2007
|
||||||||||
Grant
date fair value per share
|
n/a
|
$
|
4.14
|
$
|
4.74
|
$
|
4.04
|
||||||
Expected
term (in years)
|
n/a
|
6.5
|
6.4
|
6.4
|
|||||||||
Expected
volatility
|
n/a
|
19.0
|
%
|
35.0
|
%
|
19.4
|
%
|
||||||
Risk
free interest rate
|
n/a
|
4.8
|
%
|
3.4
|
%
|
4.5
|
%
|
9.
Segment Information
The
following is business segment information for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2008 and 2007 (in thousands):
Three Months Ended
|
Nine Months Ended
|
||||||||||||
September 30,
|
September 30,
|
||||||||||||
2008
|
2007
|
2008
|
2007
|
||||||||||
Revenues:
|
|||||||||||||
Standard
Commercial Segment
|
$
|
20,280
|
$
|
23,718
|
$
|
64,617
|
$
|
65,488
|
|||||
Specialty
Commercial Segment
|
30,245
|
32,910
|
94,617
|
93,986
|
|||||||||
Personal
Segment
|
16,053
|
15,185
|
48,277
|
43,654
|
|||||||||
Corporate
|
(1,589
|
)
|
743
|
983
|
2,122
|
||||||||
Consolidated
|
$
|
64,989
|
$
|
72,556
|
$
|
208,494
|
$
|
205,250
|
|||||
Pre-tax
income (loss), net of minority interest:
|
|||||||||||||
Standard
Commercial Segment
|
$
|
887
|
$
|
3,702
|
$
|
9,104
|
$
|
9,125
|
|||||
Specialty
Commercial Segment
|
745
|
6,500
|
12,601
|
20,627
|
|||||||||
Personal
Segment
|
2,544
|
1,854
|
7,047
|
6,148
|
|||||||||
Corporate
|
(4,030
|
)
|
(1,909
|
)
|
(7,224
|
)
|
(5,108
|
)
|
|||||
Consolidated
|
$
|
146
|
$
|
10,147
|
$
|
21,528
|
$
|
30,792
|
19
The
following is additional business segment information as of the dates indicated
(in thousands):
September 30,
|
December 31,
|
||||||
2008
|
2007
|
||||||
Assets
|
|||||||
Standard
Commercial Segment
|
$
|
157,105
|
$
|
211,761
|
|||
Specialty
Commercial Segment
|
219,124
|
229,473
|
|||||
Personal
Segment
|
78,143
|
100,986
|
|||||
Corporate
|
95,308
|
64,762
|
|||||
$
|
549,680
|
$
|
606,982
|
10.
Reinsurance
We
reinsure a portion of the risk we underwrite in order to control the exposure
to
losses and to protect capital resources. We cede to reinsurers a portion of
these risks and pay premiums based upon the risk and exposure of the policies
subject to such reinsurance. Ceded reinsurance involves credit risk and is
generally subject to aggregate loss limits. Although the reinsurer is liable
to
us to the extent of the reinsurance ceded, we are ultimately liable as the
direct insurer on all risks reinsured. Reinsurance recoverables are reported
after allowances for uncollectible amounts. We monitor the financial condition
of reinsurers on an ongoing basis and review our reinsurance arrangements
periodically. Reinsurers are selected based on their financial condition,
business practices and the price of their product offerings.
The
following table shows earned premiums ceded and reinsurance loss recoveries
by
period (in thousands):
Three Months Ended
|
Nine Months Ended
|
||||||||||||
September 30,
|
September 30,
|
||||||||||||
2008
|
2007
|
2008
|
2007
|
||||||||||
Ceded
earned premiums
|
$
|
2,153
|
$
|
2,035
|
$
|
6,126
|
$
|
10,059
|
|||||
Reinsurance
recoveries
|
$
|
8,211
|
$
|
537
|
$
|
9,474
|
$
|
3,973
|
Our
insurance company subsidiaries presently retain 100% of the risk associated
with
all non-standard personal automobile policies marketed by our Phoenix Operating
Unit. We currently reinsure the following exposures on business generated by
our
HGA Operating Unit, our TGA Operating Unit and our Aerospace Operating
Unit:
·
|
Property
catastrophe.
Our property catastrophe reinsurance reduces the financial impact
a
catastrophe could have on our commercial property insurance lines.
Catastrophes might include multiple claims and policyholders. Catastrophes
include hurricanes, windstorms, earthquakes, hailstorms, explosions,
severe winter weather and fires. Our property catastrophe reinsurance
is
excess-of-loss reinsurance, which provides us reinsurance coverage
for
losses in excess of an agreed-upon amount. We utilize catastrophe
models
to assist in determining appropriate retention and limits to purchase.
The
terms of our property catastrophe reinsurance, effective July 1,
2008,
are:
|
20
o
|
We
retain the first $3.0 million of property catastrophe losses;
and
|
o
|
Our
reinsurers reimburse us 100% for each $1.00 of loss in excess of
our $3.0
million retention up to $10.0 million for each catastrophic occurrence,
subject to an aggregate limit of $14 million. As a result of hurricane
losses we have ceded to our reinsurers losses of approximately $7.0
million and have approximately $7.0 million of coverage remaining
under
this layer of catastrophe reinsurance at September 30,
2008.
|
o
|
Our
reinsurers reimburse us 100% for each $1.00 of loss in excess of
$10.0
million up to $35.0 million for each catastrophic occurrence subject
to an
aggregate limit of $50.0 million.
|
·
|
Commercial
property.
Our commercial property reinsurance is excess-of-loss coverage intended
to
reduce the financial impact a single-event or catastrophic loss may
have
on our results. The terms of our commercial property reinsurance,
effective July 1, 2008, are:
|
o
|
We
retain the first $1.0 million of loss for each commercial property
risk;
|
o
|
Our
reinsurers reimburse us for the next $5.0 million for each commercial
property risk; and
|
o
|
Individual
risk facultative reinsurance is purchased on any commercial property
with
limits above $5.0 million.
|
·
|
Commercial
casualty.
Our commercial casualty reinsurance is excess-of-loss coverage intended
to
reduce the financial impact a single-event loss may have on our results.
The terms of our commercial casualty reinsurance, effective July
1, 2008,
are:
|
o
|
We
retain the first $1.0 million of any commercial liability risk: and
|
o
|
Our
reinsurers reimburse us for the next $5.0 million for each commercial
liability risk.
|
·
|
Aviation.
We purchase reinsurance specific to the aviation risks underwritten
by our
Aerospace Operating Unit. This reinsurance provides aircraft hull
and
liability coverage and airport liability coverage on a per occurrence
basis on the following terms:
|
o
|
We
retain the first $350,000 of each aircraft hull or liability loss
or
airport liability loss;
|
o
|
Our
reinsurers reimburse us for the next $2.15 million of each aircraft
hull
loss and for the next $650,000 of each aircraft or airport liability
loss;
and
|
o
|
Risks
with liability limits greater than $1.0 million are placed in a quota
share treaty where we retain 20% of incurred losses.
|
11.
Notes Payable
On
June
21, 2005, an unconsolidated trust subsidiary completed a private placement
of
$30.0 million of 30-year floating rate trust preferred securities.
Simultaneously, we borrowed $30.9 million from the trust subsidiary and
contributed $30.0 million to one of our insurance company subsidiaries in order
to increase policyholder surplus. The note bears an initial interest rate of
7.725% until June 15, 2015, at which time interest will adjust quarterly to
the
three-month LIBOR rate plus 3.25 percentage points. Under the terms of the
note,
we pay interest only each quarter and the principal of the note at maturity.
As
of September 30, 2008, the note balance was $30.9 million.
21
On
January 27, 2006, we borrowed $15.0 million under our revolving credit facility
to fund the cash required to close the acquisition of the subsidiaries
comprising our TGA Operating Unit. As of September 30, 2008, the balance on
the
revolving note was $2.8 million, which currently bears interest at 5.78% per
annum. Also included in notes payable is $2.3 million outstanding as of
September 30, 2008 under PAAC’s revolving credit sub-facility, which also
currently bears interest at 5.78% per annum. (See Note 13, “Credit
Facilities.”)
On
August
23, 2007, an unconsolidated trust subsidiary completed a private placement
of
$25.0 million of 30-year floating rate trust preferred securities.
Simultaneously, we borrowed $25.8 million from the trust subsidiary for working
capital and general corporate purposes. The note bears an initial interest
rate of 8.28% until September 15, 2017, at which time interest will adjust
quarterly to the three-month LIBOR rate plus 2.90 percentage points. Under
the
terms of the note, we pay interest only each quarter and the principal of the
note at maturity. As of September 30, 2008 the note balance was $25.8
million.
12.
Structured Settlements
In
connection with the acquisition of the subsidiaries comprising our TGA Operating
Unit, we recorded a payable for future guaranteed payments of $25.0 million
discounted at 4.4%, the rate of two-year U.S. Treasuries (the only investment
permitted on the trust account securing such future payments). As of September
30, 2008 we had fully repaid our obligation to the sellers.
13.
Credit Facilities
On
June
29, 2005, we entered into a credit facility with The Frost National Bank. The
credit facility was amended and restated on January 27, 2006 to a $20.0 million
revolving credit facility, with a $5.0 million letter of credit sub-facility.
The credit facility was further amended effective May 31, 2007 to increase
the
revolving credit facility to $25.0 million and establish a new $5.0 million
revolving credit sub-facility for the premium finance operations of PAAC. The
credit agreement was again amended effective February 20, 2008 to extend the
termination to January 27, 2010, revise various affirmative and negative
covenants and decrease the interest rate in most instances to the three month
Eurodollar rate plus 1.90 percentage points, payable quarterly in arrears.
We
pay letter of credit fees at the rate of 1.00% per annum. Our obligations under
the revolving credit facility are secured by a security interest in the capital
stock of all of our subsidiaries, guaranties of all of our subsidiaries and
the
pledge of substantially all of our assets. The revolving credit facility
contains covenants which, among other things, require us to maintain certain
financial and operating ratios and restrict certain distributions, transactions
and organizational changes. As of September 30, 2008, we were in compliance
with
all of our financial and non-financial covenants under this credit facility.
(See Note 11, “Notes Payable.”)
22
14.
Deferred Policy Acquisition Costs
The
following table shows total deferred and amortized policy acquisition costs
by
period (in thousands):
Three Months Ended
|
Nine Months Ended
|
||||||||||||
September 30,
|
September 30,
|
||||||||||||
2008
|
2007
|
2008
|
2007
|
||||||||||
Deferred
|
$
|
(13,700
|
)
|
$
|
(12,197
|
)
|
$
|
(41,718
|
)
|
$
|
(37,163
|
)
|
|
Amortized
|
14,204
|
11,635
|
41,326
|
33,532
|
|||||||||
Net
|
$
|
504
|
$
|
(562
|
)
|
$
|
(392
|
)
|
$
|
(3,631
|
)
|
15.
Earnings per Share
The
following table sets forth basic and diluted weighted average shares outstanding
for the periods indicated (in thousands):
Three Months Ended
|
Nine Months Ended
|
||||||||||||
September 30,
|
September 30,
|
||||||||||||
2008
|
2007
|
2008
|
2007
|
||||||||||
Weighted
average shares - basic
|
20,809
|
20,768
|
20,799
|
20,768
|
|||||||||
Effect
of dilutive securities
|
62
|
-
|
82
|
-
|
|||||||||
Weighted
average shares - assuming dilution
|
20,871
|
20,768
|
20,881
|
20,768
|
For
the
three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, 899,166 shares of common stock
potentially issuable upon the exercise of employee stock options were excluded
from the weighted average number of shares outstanding on a diluted basis
because the effect of such options would be anti-dilutive. For the three and
nine months ended September 30, 2007, 520,000 shares of common stock potentially
issuable upon exercise of employee stock options were excluded from the weighted
average number of shares outstanding on a diluted basis because the effect
of
such options would be anti-dilutive.
16.
Net Periodic Pension Cost
The
following table details the net periodic pension cost incurred by period (in
thousands):
Three Months Ended
|
Nine Months Ended
|
||||||||||||
September 30,
|
September 30,
|
||||||||||||
2008
|
2007
|
2008
|
2007
|
||||||||||
Interest
cost
|
$
|
167
|
$
|
180
|
$
|
501
|
$
|
540
|
|||||
Amortization
of net (gain) loss
|
16
|
50
|
48
|
150
|
|||||||||
Expected
return on plan assets
|
(167
|
)
|
(161
|
)
|
(502
|
)
|
(482
|
)
|
|||||
Net
periodic pension cost
|
$
|
16
|
$
|
69
|
$
|
47
|
$
|
208
|
23
We
contributed $414 thousand and $31 thousand to our frozen defined benefit cash
balance plan (“Cash Balance Plan”) during the three months ended September 30,
2008 and 2007, respectively. We contributed $650 thousand and $301 thousand
to
our Cash Balance Plan during the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007,
respectively. Refer to Note 13 to the consolidated financial statements in
our
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 for more
discussion of our retirement plans.
17.
Contingencies
We
are
engaged in legal proceedings in the ordinary course of business, none of which,
either individually or in the aggregate, are believed likely to have a material
adverse effect on our consolidated financial position or results of operations,
in the opinion of management. The various legal proceedings to which we are
a
party are routine in nature and incidental to our business.
Item
2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results
of
Operations.
The
following discussion should be read together with our consolidated financial
statements and the notes thereto. This discussion contains forward-looking
statements. Please see “Risks Associated with Forward-Looking Statements in this
Form 10-Q” for a discussion of some of the uncertainties, risks and assumptions
associated with these statements.
Introduction
Hallmark
Financial Services, Inc. (“Hallmark” and, together with subsidiaries, “we,” “us”
or “our”) is an insurance holding company which, through its subsidiaries,
engages in the sale of property/casualty insurance products to businesses and
individuals. Our business involves marketing, distributing, underwriting and
servicing commercial insurance, non-standard automobile insurance and general
aviation insurance, as well as providing other insurance related services.
Our
business is geographically concentrated in the south central and northwest
regions of the United States, except for our general aviation business which
is
written on a national basis. We
pursue
our business activities through subsidiaries whose operations are organized
into
four operating units which are supported by our insurance company
subsidiaries.
Our
non-carrier insurance activities are segregated by operating units into the
following reportable segments:
·
|
Standard
Commercial Segment.
Our Standard Commercial Segment includes the standard lines commercial
property/casualty insurance products and services handled by our
HGA
Operating Unit which is comprised of our American Hallmark Insurance
Services, Inc. and Effective Claims Management, Inc. subsidiaries.
|
·
|
Specialty
Commercial Segment.
Our Specialty Commercial Segment includes the excess and surplus
lines
commercial property/casualty insurance products and services handled
by
our TGA Operating Unit, the general aviation insurance products and
services handled by our Aerospace Operating Unit, and the excess
commercial automobile and commercial umbrella insurance products
handled
by our Heath XS Operating Unit. Our TGA Operating Unit is comprised
of our
TGA Insurance Managers, Inc., Pan American Acceptance Corporation
(“PAAC”)
and TGA Special Risk, Inc. subsidiaries. Our Aerospace Operating
Unit is
comprised of our Aerospace Insurance Managers, Inc., Aerospace Special
Risk, Inc. and Aerospace Claims Management Group, Inc. subsidiaries.
Our
Heath XS Operating Unit is compromised of our Heath XS, LLC and
Hardscrabble Data Solutions, LLC subsidiaries (collectively, the
“Heath
Group”.)
|
24
·
|
Personal
Segment.
Our Personal Segment includes the non-standard personal automobile
insurance products and services handled by our Phoenix Operating
Unit
which is comprised solely of American Hallmark General Agency, Inc.,
which
does business as Hallmark Insurance
Company.
|
The
retained premium produced by our operating units is supported by the following
insurance company subsidiaries:
·
|
American
Hallmark Insurance Company of Texas (“AHIC”) presently
retains all of the risks on the commercial property/casualty policies
marketed by our HGA Operating Unit, retains a portion of the risks
on the
non-standard personal automobile policies marketed by our Phoenix
Operating Unit, assumes a portion of the risks on the commercial
property/casualty policies marketed by our TGA Operating Unit and
assumes
a portion of the risks on the aviation property/casualty products
marketed
by our Aerospace Operating Unit.
|
·
|
Hallmark
Specialty Insurance Company (“HSIC”) presently
assumes a portion of the risks on the commercial property/casualty
policies marketed by our TGA Operating
Unit.
|
·
|
Hallmark
Insurance Company (“HIC”) (formerly known as Phoenix Indemnity Insurance
Company)
presently assumes a portion of the risks on the non-standard personal
automobile policies marketed by our Phoenix Operating Unit and assumes
a
portion of the risks on the aviation property/casualty products marketed
by our Aerospace Operating Unit.
|
Effective
January 1, 2006, our insurance company subsidiaries entered into a pooling
arrangement, which was subsequently amended on December 15, 2006, pursuant
to
which AHIC retains 46% of the total net premiums written by all of our operating
units, HIC retains 34% of our total net premiums written and HSIC retains 20%
of
our total net premiums written. This pooling arrangement had no impact on our
consolidated financial statements under GAAP.
Results
of Operations
Management
Overview. During
the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, our total revenues were
$65.0 and $208.5 million, representing a 10% decrease and a 2% increase over
the
$72.6 million and $205.3 million in total revenues for the same periods of
2007.
The decrease in total revenue for the three months ended September 30, 2008
was
primarily due to a reduction in earned premium, recognized net losses on our
investment portfolio and lower commission income. The increase in revenue for
the nine months ended September 30, 2008 was primarily due to increased earned
premium and investment income partially offset by lower commission income and
recognized losses on our investment portfolio. The recognized losses on our
investment portfolio included a $3.0 million impairment for a Washington Mutual
senior debt security.
25
Standard
Commercial Segment revenues decreased $3.4 million and $0.9 million, or 14%
and
1%, during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008 as compared to
the
same periods during 2007, due primarily to lower earned premium as a result
of
general economic conditions and our continued underwriting discipline in an
increasingly competitive marketplace. Specialty Commercial Segment revenues
decreased $2.7 million, or 8%, and increased $0.6 million, or 1%, during the
three months and nine months ended September 30, 2008 as compared to the same
periods of 2007, due to lower commission income primarily as a result of
retaining a higher percentage of the business produced by an agency subsidiary,
partially offset by increased net premiums earned as a result of the increased
retention of business. Revenues from our Personal Segment increased $0.9 million
and $4.6 million, or 6% and 11%, during the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2008 as compared to the same periods during 2007, due largely
to
geographic expansion into new states. Corporate revenue decreased $2.3 million
and $1.1 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008
primarily due to recognized losses on our investment portfolio of $2.5 million
and $1.4 million during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008
as
compared to recognized gains on our investment portfolio of $0.4 million and
$1.3 million during the same period the prior year, offset by investment income
of $0.6 million and $1.6 million for the same periods due to changes in capital
allocation.
We
reported net income of $0.6 million and $15.3 million for the three and nine
months ended September 30, 2008, which was $6.2 million and $5.3 million lower
than the $6.8 million and $20.6 million reported for the same periods in 2007.
On a diluted basis per share, net income was $0.03 and $0.73 per share for
the
three months and nine months ended September 30, 2008 as compared to $0.33
and
$0.99 per share for the same periods in 2007. The decrease in net income for
the
three and nine months ended September 30, 2008 was primarily attributable to
decreased revenue for the three month period, as discussed above, and increased
loss and loss adjustment expenses for both the three and nine month periods
primarily attributable to third quarter net hurricane losses..
26
Third
Quarter 2008 as Compared to Third Quarter 2007
The
following is additional business segment information for the three months ended
September 30, 2008 and 2007 (in thousands):
Consolidated
Segment Data
Three Months Ended September 30, 2008
|
||||||||||||||||
Standard
|
Specialty
|
|||||||||||||||
Commercial
|
Commercial
|
Personal
|
||||||||||||||
Segment
|
Segment
|
Segment
|
Corporate
|
Consolidated
|
||||||||||||
Produced
premium (1)
|
$
|
18,957
|
$
|
36,295
|
$
|
14,763
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
70,015
|
||||||
Gross
premiums written
|
18,954
|
25,288
|
14,763
|
-
|
59,005
|
|||||||||||
Ceded
premiums written
|
(1,274
|
)
|
(1,219
|
)
|
-
|
-
|
(2,493
|
)
|
||||||||
Net
premiums written
|
17,680
|
24,069
|
14,763
|
-
|
56,512
|
|||||||||||
Change
in unearned premiums
|
1,784
|
650
|
(18
|
)
|
-
|
2,416
|
||||||||||
Net
premiums earned
|
19,464
|
24,719
|
14,745
|
-
|
58,928
|
|||||||||||
Total
revenues
|
20,280
|
30,245
|
16,053
|
(1,589
|
)
|
64,989
|
||||||||||
Losses
and loss adjustment expenses
|
13,239
|
16,287
|
9,455
|
-
|
38,981
|
|||||||||||
Pre-tax
income (loss), net of minority interest
|
887
|
745
|
2,544
|
(4,030
|
)
|
146
|
||||||||||
Net
loss ratio (2)
|
68.0
|
%
|
65.9
|
%
|
64.1
|
%
|
66.2
|
%
|
||||||||
Net
expense ratio (2)
|
27.4
|
%
|
31.1
|
%
|
22.6
|
%
|
28.8
|
%
|
||||||||
Net
combined ratio (2)
|
95.4
|
%
|
97.0
|
%
|
86.7
|
%
|
95.0
|
%
|
Three Months Ended September 30, 2007
|
||||||||||||||||
Standard
|
Specialty
|
|||||||||||||||
Commercial
|
Commercial
|
Personal
|
||||||||||||||
Segment
|
Segment
|
Segment
|
Corporate
|
Consolidated
|
||||||||||||
Produced
premium (1)
|
$
|
21,945
|
$
|
37,919
|
$
|
14,854
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
74,718
|
||||||
Gross
premiums written
|
21,918
|
25,531
|
14,855
|
-
|
62,304
|
|||||||||||
Ceded
premiums written
|
386
|
(827
|
)
|
-
|
-
|
(441
|
)
|
|||||||||
Net
premiums written
|
22,304
|
24,704
|
14,855
|
-
|
61,863
|
|||||||||||
Change
in unearned premiums
|
(311
|
)
|
(870
|
)
|
(919
|
)
|
-
|
(2,100
|
)
|
|||||||
Net
premiums earned
|
21,993
|
23,834
|
13,936
|
-
|
59,763
|
|||||||||||
Total
revenues
|
23,718
|
32,910
|
15,185
|
743
|
72,556
|
|||||||||||
Losses
and loss adjustment expenses
|
13,513
|
13,682
|
9,532
|
(4
|
)
|
36,723
|
||||||||||
Pre-tax
income (loss)
|
3,702
|
6,500
|
1,854
|
(1,909
|
)
|
10,147
|
||||||||||
Net
loss ratio (2)
|
61.4
|
%
|
57.4
|
%
|
68.4
|
%
|
61.4
|
%
|
||||||||
Net
expense ratio (2)
|
27.1
|
%
|
30.6
|
%
|
22.9
|
%
|
27.5
|
%
|
||||||||
Net
combined ratio (2)
|
88.5
|
%
|
88.0
|
%
|
91.3
|
%
|
88.9
|
%
|
(1) |
Produced
premium is a non-GAAP measurement that management uses to track total
controlled premium produced by our operations. We believe this is
a useful
tool
for users of our financial statements to measure our premium production
whether retained by our insurance company subsidiaries or retained
by
third party insurance carriers where we receive commission
revenue.
|
(2) |
The
net loss ratio is calculated as incurred losses and loss adjustment
expenses divided by net premiums earned, each determined in accordance
with GAAP. The net expense ratio is calculated as underwriting expenses
of
our insurance company subsidiaries (which include provisional ceding
commissions, direct agent commissions, premium taxes and assessments,
professional fees, other general underwriting expenses and allocated
overhead expenses) and offset by agency fee income, divided by net
premiums earned, each determined in accordance with GAAP. Net combined
ratio is calculated as the sum of the net loss ratio and the net
expense
ratio.
|
27
Standard
Commercial Segment
Gross
premiums written for the Standard Commercial Segment were $19.0 million for
the
three months ended September 30, 2008, which was $2.9 million less than the
$21.9 million for the three months ended September 30, 2007. Net premiums
written were $17.7 million for the three months ended September 30, 2008 as
compared to the $22.3 million reported for the same period in 2007. The primary
reasons for the decline in premiums were general economic conditions and our
continued underwriting discipline in an increasingly competitive marketplace..
Total
revenue for the Standard Commercial Segment was $20.3 million for the three
months ended September 30, 2008 as compared to $23.7 million for the same period
in 2007. This $3.4 million decrease was due primarily to decreased earned
premium of $2.5 million as well as decreased contingent commissions of $0.7
million related to unfavorable loss development on prior accident years during
the third quarter of 2008 as compared to the same period for 2007.
Pre-tax
income for our Standard Commercial Segment of $0.9 million for the third quarter
of 2008 decreased $2.8 million from the $3.7 million reported for the third
quarter of 2007. The decreased revenue discussed above was the primary reason
for the decrease in pre-tax income, partially offset by lower losses and loss
adjustment expense of $0.3 million for the quarter and lower operating expenses
of $0.3 million due to lower production related costs. Losses and loss
adjustment expense decreased despite $3.3 million of incurred losses net of
reinsurance attributable to hurricane damage during the quarter.
The
net
loss ratio of 68.0% for the three months ended September 30, 2008 as compared
to
61.4% for the prior year was unfavorably impacted by hurricane related losses
net of reinsurance for the three months ended September 30, 2008. The gross
loss
ratio was 89.7% for the three months ended September 30, 2008 as compared to
59.6% for the same period the prior year. The gross loss results for the three
months ended September 30, 2008 included $8.8 million of hurricane related
losses partially offset by $0.4 million of favorable prior year development
as
compared to unfavorable loss development on prior accident years of $0.4 million
recognized during the same period of 2007. Hurricane losses accounted for 42.3%
of the gross loss ratio and 17.1% of the net loss ratio for the quarter. The
Standard Commercial Segment reported net expense ratios of 27.4% and 27.1%
for
the second quarters of 2008 and 2007, respectively.
Specialty
Commercial Segment
Gross
premiums written for the Specialty Commercial Segment for the third quarter
of
2008 were $25.3 million, which was $0.2 million less than the $25.5 million
reported for the same period in 2007. Net premiums written for the third quarter
of 2008 were $24.1 million, which was $0.6 million less than the $24.7 million
reported for the same period in 2007. The decrease in premium volume was due
to
general
economic conditions and our continued underwriting discipline in an increasingly
competitive marketplace in
both
the excess and surplus and general aviation markets.
Total
revenue for the Specialty Commercial Segment of $30.2 million for the third
quarter of 2008 was $2.7 million less than the $32.9 million reported in the
third quarter of 2007. This 8% decrease in revenue was largely due to lower
commission income of $2.2 million primarily as a result of retaining a higher
percentage of the business produced by an agency subsidiary, reduced contingent
commission of $1.2 million resulting from the impact of hurricane losses, and
decreased investment income of $0.1 million, partially offset by increased
net
premiums earned of $0.9 million for the quarter as a result of the increased
retention of business.
28
Pre-tax
income for the Specialty Commercial Segment of $0.7 million for the third
quarter of 2008 decreased $5.8 million from the $6.5 million reported for the
same period in 2007. The decline in pre-tax income was primarily attributable
to
decreased revenue, discussed above, as well as increased losses and loss
adjustment expenses of $2.6 million. Incurred losses net of reinsurance of
$2.7
million from hurricane damage was the primary cause of the increase in losses
and loss adjustment expense. Pre-tax income was also impacted by higher other
operating expenses of $1.2 million as a result of a premium receivable write-off
due to the default of a producer in our TGA Operating Unit, partially offset
by
decreased production related expenses of $0.8 million due to lower produced
premium.
The
Specialty Commercial Segment reported a net loss ratio of 65.9% for the third
quarter of 2008 as compared to 57.4% for the third quarter of 2007. In addition
to hurricane related losses, unfavorable prior accident year development of
$0.5
million for the third quarter of 2008 as compared to favorable prior accident
year development of $1.0 million during the same period of 2007 adversely
impacted the net loss ratio. Hurricane losses accounted for 10.8% of the net
loss ratio for the quarter. The Specialty Commercial Segment reported a net
expense ratio of 31.1% for the third quarter of 2008, as compared to 30.6%
for
the third quarter of 2007.
Personal
Segment
Net
premium written for our Personal Segment decreased $0.1 million during the
third
quarter of 2008 to $14.8 million compared to $14.9 million in the third quarter
of 2007.
Total
revenue for the Personal Segment increased 6% to $16.1 million for the third
quarter of 2008 from $15.2 million for the same period in 2007. The primary
reason for the increase was higher earned premium of $0.8 million.
Pre-tax
income for the Personal Segment was $2.5 million for the three months ended
September 30, 2008 as compared to $1.9 million for the same period in 2007.
The
increased revenue, as discussed above, was partially offset by increased
operating expenses of $0.3 million.
The
Personal Segment reported a net loss ratio of 64.1% for the third quarter of
2008 as compared to 68.4% for the same period in 2007. The decline in the net
loss ratio results from a change in current accident year loss estimates. We
recognized $0.2 million of favorable prior accident year development in both
the
third quarter 2008 and 2007. The Personal Segment reported a net expense ratio
of 22.6% for the third quarter of 2008 as compared to 22.9% for the third
quarter of 2007. The decrease in the net expense ratio was mainly due to
increased finance charges and fixed overhead allocations in relation to earned
premium.
29
Corporate
Corporate
revenue decreased $2.3 million for the three months ended September 30, 2008.
Recognized losses of $2.5 million on our investment portfolio as compared to
recognized gains of $0.4 million during the same period in 2007 was partially
offset by increased investment income of $0.6 million due to changes in capital
allocation. The recognized losses on our investment portfolio included a $3.0
million impairment for a Washington Mutual senior debt security.
Corporate
pre-tax loss was $4.0 million for the third quarter of 2008 as compared to
$1.9
million for the same period in 2007. Contributing to the increased loss in
addition to the decreased revenue discussed above was increased interest expense
of $0.2 million due primarily to the issuance of trust preferred securities
in
August 2007 partially offset by decreased operating expense of $0.4 million.
30
Nine
Months Ended September 30, 2008 as Compared to Nine Months Ended September
30,
2007
The
following is additional business segment information for the nine months ended
September 30, 2008 and 2007 (in thousands):
Hallmark
Financial Services, Inc.
Consolidated
Segment Data
Nine
Months Ended September 30, 2008
|
||||||||||||||||
Standard
|
Specialty
|
|||||||||||||||
Commercial
|
Commercial
|
Personal
|
||||||||||||||
Segment
|
Segment
|
Segment
|
Corporate
|
Consolidated
|
||||||||||||
Produced
premium (1)
|
$ |
62,330
|
$ |
104,302
|
$ |
46,643
|
$ |
-
|
$ |
213,275
|
||||||
Gross
premiums written
|
62,327
|
77,387
|
46,643
|
-
|
186,357
|
|||||||||||
Ceded
premiums written
|
(3,667
|
)
|
(2,836
|
)
|
-
|
-
|
(6,503
|
)
|
||||||||
Net
premiums written
|
58,660
|
74,551
|
46,643
|
-
|
179,854
|
|||||||||||
Change
in unearned premiums
|
2,224
|
(1,900
|
)
|
(2,242
|
)
|
-
|
(1,918
|
)
|
||||||||
Net
premiums earned
|
60,884
|
72,651
|
44,401
|
-
|
177,936
|
|||||||||||
Total
revenues
|
64,617
|
94,617
|
48,277
|
983
|
208,494
|
|||||||||||
Losses
and loss adjustment expenses
|
36,218
|
45,266
|
29,030
|
-
|
110,514
|
|||||||||||
Pre-tax
income (loss), net of minority interest
|
9,104
|
12,601
|
7,047
|
(7,224
|
)
|
21,528
|
||||||||||
Net
loss ratio (2)
|
59.5
|
%
|
62.3
|
%
|
65.4
|
%
|
62.1
|
%
|
||||||||
Net
expense ratio (2)
|
27.2
|
%
|
30.7
|
%
|
22.2
|
%
|
28.9
|
%
|
||||||||
Net
combined ratio (2)
|
86.7
|
%
|
93.0
|
%
|
87.6
|
%
|
91.0
|
%
|
Nine
Months Ended September 30, 2007
|
||||||||||||||||
Standard
|
Specialty
|
|||||||||||||||
Commercial
|
Commercial
|
Personal
|
||||||||||||||
Segment
|
Segment
|
Segment
|
Corporate
|
Consolidated
|
||||||||||||
Produced
premium (1)
|
$ |
70,246
|
$ |
118,232
|
$ |
43,228
|
$ |
-
|
$ |
231,706
|
||||||
Gross
premiums written
|
70,139
|
80,172
|
43,228
|
-
|
193,539
|
|||||||||||
Ceded
premiums written
|
(5,053
|
)
|
(3,556
|
)
|
-
|
-
|
(8,609
|
)
|
||||||||
Net
premiums written
|
65,086
|
76,616
|
43,228
|
-
|
184,930
|
|||||||||||
Change
in unearned premiums
|
(2,966
|
)
|
(12,100
|
)
|
(3,143
|
)
|
-
|
(18,209
|
)
|
|||||||
Net
premiums earned
|
62,120
|
64,516
|
40,085
|
-
|
166,721
|
|||||||||||
Total
revenues
|
65,488
|
93,986
|
43,654
|
2,122
|
205,250
|
|||||||||||
Losses
and loss adjustment expenses
|
37,621
|
35,398
|
26,612
|
(11
|
)
|
99,620
|
||||||||||
Pre-tax
income (loss)
|
9,125
|
20,627
|
6,148
|
(5,108
|
)
|
30,792
|
||||||||||
Net
loss ratio (2)
|
60.6
|
%
|
54.9
|
%
|
66.4
|
%
|
59.8
|
%
|
||||||||
Net
expense ratio (2)
|
27.3
|
%
|
31.4
|
%
|
23.1
|
%
|
27.9
|
%
|
||||||||
Net
combined ratio (2)
|
87.9
|
%
|
86.3
|
%
|
89.5
|
%
|
87.7
|
%
|
(1)
Produced premium is a non-GAAP measurement that management uses to track
total
controlled premium produced by our operations. We believe this is a useful
tool
for users of our financial statements to measure our premium production whether
retained by our insurance company subsidiaries or retained by third party
insurance carriers where we receive commission revenue.
(2)
The
net loss ratio is calculated as incurred losses and loss adjustment expenses
divided by net premiums earned, each determined in accordance with GAAP.
The net
expense ratio is calculated as underwriting expenses of our insurance company
subsidiaries (which include provisional ceding commissions, direct agent
commissions, premium taxes and assessments, professional fees, other general
underwriting expenses and allocated overhead expenses) and offset by agency
fee
income, divided by net premiums earned, each determined in accordance with
GAAP.
Net combined ratio is calculated as the sum of the net loss ratio and the
net
expense ratio.
31
Standard
Commercial Segment
Gross
premiums written for the Standard Commercial Segment were $62.3 million for
the
nine months ended September 30, 2008, or 11% less than the $70.1 million
reported for the same period in 2007. Net premiums written were $58.7 million
for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 as compared to $65.1 million
reported for the same period in 2007. The primary reasons for the decline in
premiums were general economic conditions and our continued underwriting
discipline in an increasingly competitive marketplace.
Total
revenue for the Standard Commercial Segment of $64.6 million for the nine months
ended September 30, 2008 was $0.9 million less than the $65.5 million reported
during the nine months ended September 30, 2007. This decrease in total revenue
was primarily due to lower earned premium of $1.2 million and lower processing
and service fees of $0.4 million. These decreases in revenue were partially
offset by increased contingent commissions of $0.6 million related to favorable
loss development on prior accident years during 2008 compared to the same period
for 2007 and increased net investment income of $0.1 million.
Pre-tax
income for our Standard Commercial Segment of $9.1 million for the nine months
ended September 30, 2008 remained relatively unchanged for the same period
of
2007. As discussed above revenues decreased $0.9 million and operating expenses
increased $0.6 million due predominately to employee growth. These changes
were
offset by lower loss and loss adjustment expenses of $1.4 million despite $3.3
million of incurred losses net of reinsurance attributable to hurricane damage
during the third quarter.
The
net
loss ratio for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 was 59.5% as compared
to
the 60.6% reported for the same period of 2007. The gross loss ratio before
reinsurance was 65.6% for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 as compared
to 58.2% for the same period the prior year. The gross loss results for the
nine
months ended September 30, 2008 included $8.8 million of hurricane related
losses and $2.6 million of favorable prior year development as compared to
favorable prior year development of $0.8 million recognized during the same
period of 2007. Hurricane losses accounted for 13.6% of the gross loss ratio
and
5.5% of the net loss ratio for the nine months ended September 30, 2008. The
Standard Commercial Segment reported net expense ratios of 27.2% and 27.3%
for
the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
Specialty
Commercial Segment
Gross
premiums written for the Specialty Commercial Segment for the first nine months
of 2008 were $77.4 million, or 3% less than the $80.2 million reported for
the
same period in 2007. Net premiums written for the first nine months of 2008
were
$74.6 million, or 3% less than the $76.6 million reported for the same period
in
2007. The decrease in premium volume was due to general
economic conditions and our continued underwriting discipline in an increasingly
competitive marketplace
in both
the excess and surplus and general aviation markets.
32
Total
revenue for the Specialty Commercial Segment of $94.6 million for the first
nine
months of 2008 was $0.6 million more than the $94.0 million reported in the
first nine months of 2007. This increase in revenue was largely due to increased
net premiums earned of $8.1 million for the first nine months of 2008 as a
result of the increased retention of business. This increase in revenue was
partially offset by lower ceding commission and fee revenue of $6.4 million
due
primarily to the Company retaining a higher percentage of the business produced
by an agency subsidiary and reduced contingent commission during the third
quarter of 2008 of $1.2 million resulting from the impact of hurricane losses.
Pre-tax
income for the Specialty Commercial Segment of $12.6 million for the first
nine
months of 2008 decreased $8.0 million, or 39%, from the $20.6 million reported
for the same period in 2007. This decrease in pre-tax income was primarily
due
to increased losses and loss adjustment expenses of $9.9 million, including
$2.7
million of incurred losses net of reinsurance attributable to hurricane damage
during the third quarter of 2008. A $1.2 million write-off of a premium
receivable due to the default of a producer in our TGA Operating Unit, partially
offset by the increased revenue discussed above and by decreased production
related expenses of $2.4 million due to lower produced premium, also contributed
to the decline in pre-tax income.
The
Specialty Commercial Segment reported a net loss ratio of 62.3% for the first
nine months of 2008 as compared to 54.9% for the first nine months of 2007.
In
addition to hurricane losses, $1.4 million of unfavorable prior year development
as compared to favorable prior year development of $1.9 million during the
same
period of 2007 adversely impacted the net loss ratio. Hurricane losses accounted
for 3.7% of the net loss ratio for the nine months ended September 30, 2008.
The
Specialty Commercial Segment reported a net expense ratio of 30.7% for the
first
nine months of 2008 as compared to 31.4% for the first nine months of 2007.
The
decrease in the net expense ratio was primarily due to increased retention
on
our catastrophe reinsurance and commercial property per risk reinsurance
programs during the first nine months of 2008 as compared to the same period
in
2007.
Personal
Segment
Net
premium written for our Personal Segment increased $3.4 million during the
first
nine months of 2008 to $46.6 million compared to $43.2 million in the first
nine
months of 2007. The increase in premium was due mostly to continued geographic
expansion that began in 2007.
Total
revenue for the Personal Segment increased 11% to $48.3 million for the first
nine months of 2008 from $43.7 million for the same period in 2007. Higher
earned premium of $4.3 million was the primary reason for the increase in
revenue for the period. Increased finance charges of $0.5 million were partially
offset by lower third party commission revenue of $0.1 million.
Pre-tax
income for the Personal Segment was $7.0 million for the nine months ended
September 30, 2008 as compared to $6.1 million for the same period in 2007.
The
increased revenue, as discussed above, was offset by increased losses and loss
adjustment expenses of $2.4 million and increased operating expenses of $1.3
million due mostly to production related expenses attributable to the increased
earned premium.
The
Personal Segment reported a net loss ratio of 65.4% for the first nine months
of
2008 as compared to 66.4% for the same period in 2007. This decrease in the
net
loss ratio is primarily driven by favorable prior year development and the
maturing of the new business impact associated with geographic expansion. We
recognized $0.8 million of favorable prior accident year development during
the
first nine months 2008 as compared to $0.3 million of favorable prior year
development during the first nine months of 2007.
33
The
Personal Segment reported a net expense ratio of 22.2% for the first nine months
of 2008 as compared to 23.1% for the first nine months of 2007. The decrease
in
the net expense ratio was mainly due to increased finance charges in relation
to
earned premium, as well as fixed overhead allocations in relation to earned
premium.
Corporate
Corporate
revenue decreased $1.1 million for the first nine months of 2008 as compared
to
the same period in 2007. The decrease was primarily due to recognized losses
on
our investment portfolio of $1.4 million as compared to recognized gains of
$1.3
million during the prior year. The 2008 recognized losses include a $3.0 million
impairment of a Washington Mutual senior debt security. Net investment income
increased $1.6 million due primarily to changes in capital allocation during
the
first nine months of 2008 compare to the same period in 2007.
Corporate
pre-tax loss was $7.2 million for the first nine months of 2008 compared to
$5.1
million for the same period in 2007. The decrease in revenue discussed above
was
compounded by increased interest expense of $1.0 million due primarily to the
issuance of trust preferred securities in August 2007.
Financial
Condition and Liquidity
Sources
and Uses of Funds
Our
sources of funds are from insurance-related operations, financing activities
and
investing activities. Major sources of funds from operations include premiums
collected (net of policy cancellations and premiums ceded), commissions, and
processing and service fees. As a holding company, Hallmark is dependent on
dividend payments and management fees from its subsidiaries to meet operating
expenses and debt obligations. As of September 30, 2008, Hallmark had $14.1
million in unrestricted cash and invested assets at the holding company.
Unrestricted cash and invested assets of our non-insurance subsidiaries were
$2.4 million as of September 30, 2008.
AHIC,
domiciled in Texas, is limited in the payment of dividends in any 12-month
period, without the prior written consent of the Texas Department of Insurance,
to the greater of statutory net income for the prior calendar year or 10% of
statutory surplus as of the prior year end. Dividends may only be paid from
unassigned surplus funds. HIC, domiciled in Arizona, is limited in the payment
of dividends to the lesser of 10% of prior year surplus or prior year’s net
investment income, without prior written approval from the Arizona Department
of
Insurance. HSIC, domiciled in Oklahoma, is limited in the payment of dividends
to the greater of 10% of prior year surplus or prior year’s statutory net
income, without prior written approval from the Oklahoma Insurance Department.
During 2008, our insurance company subsidiaries’ ordinary dividend capacity is
$16.3 million. None of our insurance company subsidiaries paid a dividend to
Hallmark during the first nine months of 2008 or the 2007 fiscal
year.
34
Comparison
of September 30, 2008 to December 31, 2007
On
a
consolidated basis, our cash and investments (excluding restricted cash) at
September 30, 2008 were $359.7 million compared to $411.7 million at December
31, 2007. Settlement of receivables and payables for securities during the
first
quarter of 2008, as well as a decline in market value for the period,
contributed to this decrease in our cash and investments. At September 30,
2008,
91% of our investments were rated investment grade and had an average duration
of 3.4 years, including approximately 42% that were held in short-term
investments. We classify our bond securities as available for sale. The net
unrealized loss associated with the investment portfolio was $7.3 million (net
of tax effects) at September 30, 2008. (See Note 6 of Notes to Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements which appears in Item 1 of this Report.)
35
Comparison
of Nine Months Ended September 30, 2008 and September 30,
2007
Net
cash
provided by our consolidated operating activities was $37.2 million for the
first nine months of 2008 compared to $61.8 million for the first nine months
of
2007. The decrease in operating cash flow was primarily due to increased paid
losses from the maturing of retained business growth and hurricane related
losses during the third quarter of 2008.
Net
cash
used in investing activities during the first nine months of 2008 was $149.9
million as compared to $90.8 million for the same period in 2007. Contributing
to the increase in cash used in investing activities was an increase of $71.2
million in purchases of debt and equity securities, a $79.6 million increase
in
net purchases of short-term investments, a $5.2 million reduction in restricted
cash, and a net cash payment of $14.8 million, net of cash acquired for the
acquisition of the Heath Group during the third quarter of 2008, partially
offset by a $111.8 million increase in maturities and redemptions of investment
securities.
Cash
used
in financing activities during the first nine months of 2008 was $8.9 million
as
compared to $9.2 million provided by financing activities for the same period
of
2007. The cash used in both periods was primarily for the payment of deferred
guaranteed consideration to the sellers of the subsidiaries comprising our
TGA
Operating Unit. As of September 30, 2008 we had fully repaid our obligation
to
the sellers. The cash provided during 2007 primarily related to the issuance
of
trust preferred securities in August 2007.
Based
on
budgeted and year-to-date cash flow information, we believe that we have
sufficient liquidity to meet our projected insurance obligations, operational
expenses and capital expenditure requirements for the next 12 months.
Credit
Facilities
On
June
29, 2005, we entered into a credit facility with The Frost National Bank. The
credit facility was amended and restated on January 27, 2006 to a $20.0 million
revolving credit facility, with a $5.0 million letter of credit sub-facility.
The credit facility was further amended effective May 31, 2007 to increase
the
revolving credit facility to $25.0 million and establish a new $5.0 million
revolving credit sub-facility for the premium finance operations of PAAC. The
credit agreement was again amended effective February 20, 2008 to extend the
termination to January 27, 2010, revise various affirmative and negative
covenants and decrease the interest rate in most instances to the three month
Eurodollar rate plus 1.90 percentage points, payable quarterly in arrears.
We
pay letter of credit fees at the rate of 1.00% per annum. Our obligations under
the revolving credit facility are secured by a security interest in the capital
stock of all of our subsidiaries, guaranties of all of our subsidiaries and
the
pledge of substantially all of our assets. The revolving credit facility
contains covenants which, among other things, require us to maintain certain
financial and operating ratios and restrict certain distributions, transactions
and organizational changes. As of September 30, 2008, we were in compliance
with
all of our covenants. As of September 30, 2008, we had $5.1 million outstanding
under this credit facility.
36
Trust
Preferred Securities
On
August
23, 2007, an unconsolidated trust subsidiary completed a private placement
of
$25.0 million of 30-year floating rate trust preferred securities.
Simultaneously, we borrowed $25.8 million from the trust subsidiary for working
capital and general corporate purposes. The note bears an initial interest
rate of 8.28% until September 15, 2017, at which time interest will adjust
quarterly to the three-month LIBOR rate plus 2.90 percentage points. As of
September 30, 2008, the note balance was $25.8 million. Under the terms of
the
note, we pay interest only each quarter and the principal of the note at
maturity.
Structured
Settlements
In
connection with our acquisition of the subsidiaries now comprising our TGA
Operating Unit, we issued to the sellers promissory notes in the aggregate
principal amount of $23.7 million, of which $14.2 million was paid on January
2,
2007, and $9.5 million was paid on January 2, 2008. We were also obligated
to
pay to the sellers an additional $1.3 million, of which $0.8 million was paid
on
January 2, 2007 and an additional $0.5 million was paid on January 2, 2008,
in
consideration of the sellers’ compliance with certain restrictive covenants,
including a covenant not to compete for a period of five years after closing.
We
secured payment of these installments of purchase price and restrictive covenant
consideration by depositing $25.0 million in a trust account for the benefit
of
the sellers. We recorded a payable for future guaranteed payments to the sellers
of $25.0 million discounted at 4.4%, the rate of two-year U.S. Treasuries (the
only permitted investment of the trust account). As of September 30, 2008 we
had
fully repaid our obligation to the sellers.
Item
3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market
Risk.
As
of
September 30, 2008, there had been no material changes in the market risks
described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2007.
Item
4T. Controls and Procedures.
The
principal executive officer and principal financial officer of Hallmark have
evaluated our disclosure controls and procedures and have concluded that, as
of
the end of the period covered by this report, such disclosure controls and
procedures were effective in ensuring that information required to be disclosed
by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act
of
1934 is timely recorded, processed, summarized and reported. The principal
executive officer and principal financial officer also concluded that such
disclosure controls and procedures were effective in ensuring that information
required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under
such
Act is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal
executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate, to allow
timely decisions regarding required disclosure. During the most recent fiscal
quarter, there have been no changes in our internal controls over financial
reporting that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially
affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
37
Risks
Associated with Forward-Looking Statements Included in this Form
10-Q
This
Form
10-Q contains certain forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section
27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange
Act
of 1934, which are intended to be covered by the safe harbors created thereby.
These statements include the plans and objectives of management for future
operations, including plans and objectives relating to future growth of our
business activities and availability of funds. The forward-looking statements
included herein are based on current expectations that involve numerous risks
and uncertainties. Assumptions relating to the foregoing involve judgments
with
respect to, among other things, future economic, competitive and market
conditions, regulatory framework, weather-related events and future business
decisions, all of which are difficult or impossible to predict accurately and
many of which are beyond our control. Although we believe that the assumptions
underlying the forward-looking statements are reasonable, any of the assumptions
could be inaccurate and, therefore, there can be no assurance that the
forward-looking statements included in this Form 10-Q will prove to be accurate.
In light of the significant uncertainties inherent in the forward-looking
statements included herein, the inclusion of such information should not be
regarded as a representation by us or any other person that our objectives
and
plans will be achieved.
38
PART
II
OTHER
INFORMATION
Item
1. Legal
Proceedings.
We
are
engaged in legal proceedings in the ordinary course of business, none of which,
either individually or in the aggregate, are believed likely to have a material
adverse effect on our consolidated financial position or results of operations,
in the opinion of management. The various legal proceedings to which we are
a
party are routine in nature and incidental to our business.
Item
1A. Risk
Factors.
This
Item
is omitted, as permitted for a “smaller reporting company” (as defined by the
Securities and Exchange Commission).
Item
2. Unregistered
Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.
None.
Item
3. Defaults
Upon Senior Securities.
None.
Item
4. Submission
of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.
None.
Item
5. Other
Information.
None.
Item
6. Exhibits.
The
following exhibits are filed herewith or incorporated herein by
reference:
Exhibit
Number
|
Description
|
|
3(a)
|
Restated
Articles of Incorporation of the registrant, as amended (incorporated
by
reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the registrant’s Registration Statement on
Form S-1 [Registration No. 333-136414] filed September 8,
2006).
|
|
3(b)
|
Amended
and Restated By-Laws of the registrant (incorporated by reference
to
Exhibit 3.1 to the registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed October
1, 2007).
|
|
4(a)
|
Specimen
certificate for Common Stock, $0.18 par value per share, of the registrant
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Amendment No. 1 to the
registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 [Registration No.
333-136414] filed September 8,
2006).
|
39
Exhibit
Number
|
Description
|
4(b)
|
Indenture
dated as of June 21, 2005, between Hallmark Financial Services, Inc.
and
JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association (incorporated by reference
to
Exhibit 4.1 to the registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed June 27,
2005).
|
|
4(c)
|
Amended
and Restated Declaration of Trust of Hallmark Statutory Trust I dated
as
of June 21, 2005, among Hallmark Financial Services, Inc., as sponsor,
Chase Bank USA, National Association, as Delaware trustee, and JPMorgan
Chase Bank, National Association, as institutional trustee, and Mark
Schwarz and Mark Morrison, as administrators (incorporated by reference
to
Exhibit 4.2 to the registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed June 27,
2005).
|
|
4(d)
|
Form
of Junior Subordinated Debt Security Due 2035 (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 4.1 to the registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed June
27, 2005).
|
|
4(e)
|
Form
of Capital Security Certificate (incorporated by reference to Exhibit
4.2
to the registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed June 27,
2005).
|
|
4(f)
|
First
Restated Credit Agreement dated January 27, 2006, between Hallmark
Financial Services, Inc. and The Frost National Bank (incorporated
by
reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K
filed February 2, 2006).
|
|
4(g)
|
Form
of Registration Rights Agreement dated January 27, 2006, between
Hallmark
Financial Services, Inc. and Newcastle Special Opportunity Fund I,
L.P.
and Newcastle Special Opportunity Fund II, L.P. (incorporated by
reference
to Exhibit 4.1 to the registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed
February 2, 2006).
|
|
4(h)
|
Indenture
dated as of August 23, 2007, between Hallmark Financial Services,
Inc. and
The Bank of New York Trust Company, National Association (incorporated
by
reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K
filed August 24, 2007).
|
|
4(i)
|
Amended
and Restated Declaration of Trust of Hallmark Statutory Trust II
dated as
of August 23, 2007, among Hallmark Financial Services, Inc., as sponsor,
The Bank of New York (Delaware), as Delaware trustee, and The Bank
of New
York Trust Company, National Association, as institutional trustee,
and
Mark Schwarz and Mark Morrison, as administrators (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K
filed August 24, 2007).
|
|
4(j)
|
Form
of Junior Subordinated Debt Security Due 2037 (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 4.1 to the registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed August
24, 2007).
|
|
4(k)
|
Form
of Capital Security Certificate (incorporated by reference to Exhibit
4.2
to the registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed August 24,
2007).
|
|
31(a)
|
Certification
of principal executive officer required by Rule 13a-14(a) or
Rule
15d-14(a).
|
|
31(b)
|
Certification
of principal financial officer required by Rule 13a-14(a) or
Rule
15d-14(a).
|
|
32(a)
|
Certification
of principal executive officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
1350.
|
|
32(b)
|
Certification
of principal financial officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
1350.
|
40
SIGNATURES
In
accordance with the requirements of the Exchange Act, the registrant has caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly
authorized.
HALLMARK
FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
|
||
(Registrant)
|
||
Date:
November 12, 2008
|
/s/
Mark J. Morrison
|
|
Mark
J. Morrison, Chief Executive Officer and President
(Principal
Executive Officer)
|
||
Date:
November 12, 2008
|
/s/
Jeffrey R. Passmore
|
|
Jeffrey
R. Passmore, Chief Accounting Officer and Senior Vice
President
|
||
(Principal
Financial Officer)
|
41