HALLMARK FINANCIAL SERVICES INC - Quarter Report: 2008 June (Form 10-Q)
UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON,
D.C. 20549
FORM
10-Q
Quarterly
report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities
Exchange Act of 1934
For
the
quarterly period ended June 30, 2008
Commission
file number 001-11252
Hallmark
Financial Services, Inc.
(Exact
name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Nevada
|
87-0447375
|
|
(State
or other jurisdiction of
|
(I.R.S.
Employer
|
|
Incorporation
or organization)
|
Identification
No.)
|
|
777
Main Street, Suite 1000, Fort Worth, Texas
|
76102
|
|
(Address
of principal executive offices)
|
(Zip
Code)
|
Registrant's
telephone number, including area code: (817) 348-1600
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to
be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required
to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements
for
the past 90 days. Yes x
No
¨
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.
See
the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller
reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Accelerated filer ¨
|
|
Non-accelerated filer ¨
|
Smaller reporting company x
|
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x
Indicate the
number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes of common stock,
as
of the latest practicable date: Common Stock, par value $.18 per share -
20,808,954 shares outstanding as of August 11, 2008.
PART
I
FINANCIAL
INFORMATION
Item
1. Financial
Statements
INDEX
TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
Page Number
|
|
Consolidated Balance
Sheets at June 30, 2008 (unaudited) and December 31, 2007
|
3
|
Consolidated
Statements of Operations (unaudited) for the three months and six
months
ended June 30, 2008 and June 30, 2007
|
4
|
Consolidated
Statements of Stockholders’ Equity and Comprehensive Income (unaudited)
for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2008 and June
30,
2007
|
5
|
Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows (unaudited) for the six months ended June
30,
2008 and June 30, 2007
|
6
|
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)
|
7
|
2
Hallmark
Financial Services, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated
Balance Sheets
($
in
thousands)
June 30
|
December 31
|
||||||
|
2008
|
2007
|
|||||
(unaudited)
|
|||||||
ASSETS
|
|||||||
Investments:
|
|||||||
Debt
securites, available-for-sale, at fair value
|
$
|
164,137
|
$
|
248,069
|
|||
Equity
securites, available-for-sale, at fair value
|
51,694
|
15,166
|
|||||
Short-Term
investments, available-for-sale, at fair value
|
121,440
|
2,625
|
|||||
Total
investments
|
337,271
|
265,860
|
|||||
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
33,599
|
145,884
|
|||||
Restricted
cash and cash equivalents
|
11,588
|
16,043
|
|||||
Premiums
receivable
|
47,090
|
46,026
|
|||||
Accounts
receivable
|
5,257
|
5,219
|
|||||
Receivable
for securities
|
200
|
27,395
|
|||||
Prepaid
reinsurance premiums
|
682
|
274
|
|||||
Reinsurance
recoverable
|
3,791
|
4,952
|
|||||
Deferred
policy acquisition costs
|
20,652
|
19,757
|
|||||
Excess
of cost over fair value of net assets acquired
|
30,025
|
30,025
|
|||||
Intangible
assets
|
22,634
|
23,781
|
|||||
Current
federal income tax recoverable
|
724
|
-
|
|||||
Deferred
federal income taxes
|
2,413
|
275
|
|||||
Prepaid
expenses
|
1,212
|
1,240
|
|||||
Other
assets
|
21,402
|
19,583
|
|||||
Total
assets
|
$
|
538,540
|
$
|
606,314
|
|||
LIABILITES
AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
|
|||||||
Liabilites:
|
|||||||
Notes
payable
|
$
|
60,592
|
60,814
|
||||
Structured
settlements
|
-
|
10,000
|
|||||
Reserves
for unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses
|
144,374
|
125,338
|
|||||
Unearned
premiums
|
107,369
|
102,998
|
|||||
Unearned
revenue
|
2,253
|
2,949
|
|||||
Accrued
agent profit sharing
|
1,335
|
2,844
|
|||||
Accrued
ceding commission payable
|
12,189
|
12,099
|
|||||
Pension
liability
|
1,432
|
1,669
|
|||||
Current
federal income tax
|
-
|
630
|
|||||
Payable
for securities
|
3,401
|
91,401
|
|||||
Accounts
payable and other accrued expenses
|
14,150
|
16,385
|
|||||
Total
liabilities
|
347,095
|
427,127
|
|||||
Commitments
and Contingencies (Note 16)
|
|||||||
Stockholders'
equity:
|
|||||||
Common
stock, $.18 par value (authorized 33,333,333 shares in 2008 and 2007;
issued 20,816,782 in 2008 and 20,776,080 shares in 2007)
|
3,747
|
3,740
|
|||||
Capital
in excess of par value
|
119,369
|
118,459
|
|||||
Retained
earnings
|
73,162
|
58,909
|
|||||
Accumulated
other comprehensive loss
|
(4,756
|
)
|
(1,844
|
)
|
|||
Treasury
stock, at cost (7,828 shares in 2008 and 2007)
|
(77
|
)
|
(77
|
)
|
|||
Total
stockholders' equity
|
191,445
|
179,187
|
|||||
$
|
538,540
|
$
|
606,314
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part
of
the
consolidated financial statements
3
Hallmark
Financial Services, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated
Statements of Operations
(Unaudited)
($
in
thousands, except per share amounts)
Three Months Ended
|
Six Months Ended
|
||||||||||||
June 30
|
June 30
|
||||||||||||
2008
|
2007
|
2008
|
2007
|
||||||||||
Gross
premiums written
|
$
|
63,115
|
$
|
66,577
|
$
|
127,352
|
$
|
131,235
|
|||||
Ceded
premiums written
|
(2,327
|
)
|
(4,281
|
)
|
(4,659
|
)
|
(8,168
|
)
|
|||||
Net
premiums written
|
60,788
|
62,296
|
122,693
|
123,067
|
|||||||||
Change
in unearned premiums
|
(1,345
|
)
|
(6,986
|
)
|
(4,334
|
)
|
(16,109
|
)
|
|||||
Net
premiums earned
|
59,443
|
55,310
|
118,359
|
106,958
|
|||||||||
Investment
income, net of expenses
|
3,957
|
3,047
|
7,582
|
6,037
|
|||||||||
Realized
gain
|
232
|
828
|
1,091
|
881
|
|||||||||
Finance
charges
|
1,323
|
1,185
|
2,587
|
2,271
|
|||||||||
Commission
and fees
|
6,669
|
8,159
|
13,153
|
16,064
|
|||||||||
Processing
and service fees
|
36
|
203
|
78
|
475
|
|||||||||
Other
income
|
3
|
4
|
6
|
8
|
|||||||||
Total
revenues
|
71,663
|
68,736
|
142,856
|
132,694
|
|||||||||
Losses
and loss adjustment expenses
|
36,029
|
30,712
|
71,533
|
62,897
|
|||||||||
Other
operating expenses
|
23,608
|
23,723
|
47,073
|
46,424
|
|||||||||
Interest
expense
|
1,186
|
796
|
2,371
|
1,582
|
|||||||||
Amortization
of intangible assets
|
573
|
573
|
1,146
|
1,146
|
|||||||||
Total
expenses
|
61,396
|
55,804
|
122,123
|
112,049
|
|||||||||
Income
before tax
|
10,267
|
12,932
|
20,733
|
20,645
|
|||||||||
Income
tax expense
|
3,066
|
4,117
|
6,480
|
6,860
|
|||||||||
Net
income
|
$
|
7,201
|
$
|
8,815
|
$
|
14,253
|
$
|
13,785
|
|||||
Common
stockholders net income per share:
|
|||||||||||||
Basic
|
$
|
0.35
|
$
|
0.42
|
$
|
0.69
|
$
|
0.66
|
|||||
Diluted
|
$
|
0.34
|
$
|
0.42
|
$
|
0.68
|
$
|
0.66
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part
of
the
consolidated financial statements
4
Hallmark
Financial Services, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated
Statements of Stockholders’ Equity and Comprehensive
Income
(Unaudited)
($
in
thousands)
Three Months Ended
|
Six Months Ended
|
||||||||||||
June 30,
|
June 30,
|
||||||||||||
2008
|
2007
|
2008
|
2007
|
||||||||||
Common
Stock
|
|||||||||||||
Balance,
beginning of period
|
$
|
3,746
|
$
|
3,740
|
$
|
3,740
|
$
|
3,740
|
|||||
Issuance
of common stock upon option exercises
|
1
|
-
|
7
|
-
|
|||||||||
Balance,
end of period
|
3,747
|
3,740
|
3,747
|
3,740
|
|||||||||
Additional
Paid-In Capital
|
|||||||||||||
Balance,
beginning of period
|
119,120
|
117,983
|
118,459
|
117,932
|
|||||||||
Equity
based compensation
|
226
|
102
|
773
|
153
|
|||||||||
Exercise
of stock options
|
23
|
-
|
137
|
-
|
|||||||||
Balance,
end of period
|
119,369
|
118,085
|
119,369
|
118,085
|
|||||||||
Retained
Earnings
|
|||||||||||||
Balance,
beginning of period
|
65,961
|
36,450
|
58,909
|
31,480
|
|||||||||
Net
income
|
7,201
|
8,815
|
14,253
|
13,785
|
|||||||||
Balance,
end of period
|
73,162
|
45,265
|
73,162
|
45,265
|
|||||||||
Accumulated
Other Comprehensive Loss
|
|||||||||||||
Balance,
beginning of period
|
(3,086
|
)
|
(1,982
|
)
|
(1,844
|
)
|
(2,344
|
)
|
|||||
Additional
minimum pension liability, net of tax
|
11
|
64
|
21
|
64
|
|||||||||
Unrealized
losses on securities, net of tax
|
(1,681
|
)
|
(828
|
)
|
(2,933
|
)
|
(466
|
)
|
|||||
Balance,
end of period
|
(4,756
|
)
|
(2,746
|
)
|
(4,756
|
)
|
(2,746
|
)
|
|||||
Treasury
Stock
|
|||||||||||||
Balance,
beginning of period
|
(77
|
)
|
(77
|
)
|
(77
|
)
|
(77
|
)
|
|||||
Acquisition
of treasury shares
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||
Exercise
of stock options
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||
Balance,
end of period
|
(77
|
)
|
(77
|
)
|
(77
|
)
|
(77
|
)
|
|||||
Stockholders'
Equity
|
$
|
191,445
|
$
|
164,267
|
$
|
191,445
|
$
|
164,267
|
|||||
Net
income
|
$
|
7,201
|
$
|
8,815
|
$
|
14,253
|
$
|
13,785
|
|||||
Additional
minimum pension liability, net of tax
|
11
|
64
|
21
|
64
|
|||||||||
Unrealized
losses on securities, net of tax
|
(1,681
|
)
|
(828
|
)
|
(2,933
|
)
|
(466
|
)
|
|||||
Comprehensive
Income
|
$
|
5,531
|
$
|
8,051
|
$
|
11,341
|
$
|
13,383
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part
of
the
consolidated financial statements
5
Hallmark
Financial Services, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows
(Unaudited)
($
in
thousands)
Six Months Ended
|
|||||||
June 30
|
|||||||
2008
|
2007
|
||||||
Cash
flows from operating activities:
|
|||||||
Net
income
|
$
|
14,253
|
$
|
13,785
|
|||
Adjustments
to reconcile net income to cash provided by operating
activities:
|
|||||||
Depreciation
and amortization expense
|
1,517
|
1,564
|
|||||
Amortization
of discount on structured settlement
|
-
|
207
|
|||||
Deferred
federal income tax benefit
|
(641
|
)
|
(916
|
)
|
|||
Realized
gain on investments
|
(1,091
|
)
|
(881
|
)
|
|||
Change
in prepaid reinsurance premiums
|
(408
|
)
|
(144
|
)
|
|||
Change
in premiums receivable
|
(1,064
|
)
|
(9,925
|
)
|
|||
Change
in accounts receivable
|
(38
|
)
|
796
|
||||
Change
in deferred policy acquisition costs
|
(895
|
)
|
(3,069
|
)
|
|||
Change
in unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses
|
19,036
|
26,824
|
|||||
Change
in unearned premiums
|
4,371
|
16,253
|
|||||
Change
in unearned revenue
|
(696
|
)
|
(1,957
|
)
|
|||
Change
in accrued agent profit sharing
|
(1,509
|
)
|
(528
|
)
|
|||
Change
in reinsurance recoverable
|
1,161
|
(575
|
)
|
||||
Change
in current federal income tax payable
|
(1,354
|
)
|
2,520
|
||||
Change
in accrued ceding commission payable
|
90
|
3,103
|
|||||
Change
in all other liabilities
|
(4,258
|
)
|
2,059
|
||||
Change
in all other assets
|
1,275
|
(4,522
|
)
|
||||
Net
cash provided by operating activities
|
29,749
|
44,594
|
|||||
Cash
flows from investing activities:
|
|||||||
Purchases
of property and equipment
|
(273
|
)
|
(269
|
)
|
|||
Change
in restricted cash
|
6,241
|
14,527
|
|||||
Purchases
of debt and equity securities
|
(218,022
|
)
|
(106,636
|
)
|
|||
Maturities
and redemptions of investment securities
|
198,914
|
62,506
|
|||||
Net
purchases of short-term investments
|
(118,815
|
)
|
(38,771
|
)
|
|||
Net
cash used in investing activities
|
(131,955
|
)
|
(68,643
|
)
|
|||
Cash
flows from financing activities:
|
|||||||
Proceeds
from exercise of employee stock options
|
143
|
-
|
|||||
Note
payable
|
(222
|
)
|
(633
|
)
|
|||
Payment
of structured settlement
|
(10,000
|
)
|
(15,000
|
)
|
|||
Net
cash used by financing activities
|
(10,079
|
)
|
(15,633
|
)
|
|||
Decrease
in cash and cash equivalents
|
(112,285
|
)
|
(39,682
|
)
|
|||
Cash
and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
145,884
|
81,474
|
|||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at end of period
|
$
|
33,599
|
$
|
41,792
|
|||
Supplemental
cash flow information:
|
|||||||
Interest
paid
|
$
|
2,387
|
$
|
1,372
|
|||
Taxes
paid
|
$
|
8,402
|
$
|
5,256
|
|||
Supplemental
schedule of non cash investing activities:
|
|||||||
Change
in receivable for securities for investment disposals that settled
after
the balance sheet date
|
$
|
27,195
|
$
|
(14
|
)
|
||
Change
in payable for securities for investment purchases that settled after
the
balance sheet date
|
$
|
(88,000
|
)
|
$
|
8,878
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part
of
the
consolidated financial statements
6
Hallmark
Financial Services, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
1.
General
Hallmark
Financial Services, Inc. (“Hallmark” and, together with subsidiaries, “we,” “us”
or “our”) is an insurance holding company which, through its subsidiaries,
engages in the sale of property/casualty insurance products to businesses and
individuals. Our business involves marketing, distributing, underwriting and
servicing commercial insurance, non-standard automobile insurance and general
aviation insurance, as well as providing other insurance related services.
Our
business is geographically concentrated in the south central and northwest
regions of the United States, except for our general aviation business which
is
written on a national basis.
We
pursue
our business activities through subsidiaries whose operations are organized
into
four operating units which are supported by our three insurance company
subsidiaries. Our HGA Operating Unit handles standard lines commercial insurance
products and services and is comprised of American Hallmark Insurance Services,
Inc. and Effective Claims Management, Inc. Our TGA Operating Unit handles
primarily excess and surplus lines commercial insurance products and services
and is comprised of TGA Insurance Managers, Inc., Pan American Acceptance
Corporation (“PAAC”) and TGA Special Risk, Inc. Our Aerospace Operating Unit
handles general aviation insurance products and services and is comprised of
Aerospace Insurance Managers, Inc., Aerospace Special Risk, Inc. and Aerospace
Claims Management Group, Inc. Our Phoenix Operating Unit handles non-standard
personal automobile insurance products and services and is comprised solely
of
American Hallmark General Agency, Inc. (which does business as Phoenix Indemnity
Insurance Company).
These
four operating units are segregated into three reportable industry segments
for
financial accounting purposes. The Standard Commercial Segment presently
consists solely of the HGA Operating Unit and the Personal Segment presently
consists solely of our Phoenix Operating Unit. The Specialty Commercial Segment
includes both our TGA Operating Unit and our Aerospace Operating Unit.
2.
Basis of Presentation
Our
unaudited consolidated financial statements included herein have been prepared
in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) and
include our accounts and the accounts of our subsidiaries. All significant
intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial
statements prepared in accordance with GAAP have been condensed or omitted
pursuant to rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission
(“SEC”) for interim financial reporting. These financial statements should be
read in conjunction with our audited financial statements for the year ended
December 31, 2007 included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the
SEC.
The
interim financial data as of June 30, 2008 and 2007 is unaudited. However,
in
the opinion of management, the interim data includes all adjustments, consisting
only of normal recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair statement of the
results for the interim periods. The results of operations for the period ended
June 30, 2008 are not necessarily indicative of the operating results to be
expected for the full year.
7
Reclassification
Certain
previously reported amounts have been reclassified in order to conform to our
current year presentation. Such reclassification had no effect on net income
or
stockholders’ equity.
Use
of Estimates in the Preparation of the Financial
Statements
Our
preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires us to
make
estimates and assumptions that affect our reported amounts of assets and
liabilities and our disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the
date
of our financial statements, as well as our reported amounts of revenues and
expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ materially
from those estimates.
Recently
Issued Accounting Standards
In
September 2005, the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants issued
Statement of Position 05-1, “Accounting by Insurance Enterprises for Deferred
Acquisition Costs in Connection With Modifications or Exchanges of Insurance
Contracts” (“SOP 05-1”). This Statement provides guidance on accounting for
deferred acquisition costs on internal replacements of insurance and investment
contracts other than those specifically described in Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 97, “Accounting and Reporting by Insurance Enterprises
for Certain Long-Duration Contracts and for Realized Gains and Losses from
the
Sale of Investments,” previously issued by the Financial Accounting Standards
Board (“FASB”). SOP 05-01 is effective for internal replacements occurring in
fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006. The adoption of SOP 05-01 had
no
material impact on our financial condition or results of
operations.
In
June
2006, FASB Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes -
An Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109” (“FIN 48”), was issued. FIN 48
clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in a
company’s financial statements in accordance with FASB Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes”. FIN 48 also
prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial
statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to
be
taken in a tax return, as well as providing guidance on derecognition,
classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods,
disclosure and transition. FIN 48 is effective for fiscal years beginning after
December 15, 2006 with earlier application permitted as long as the company
has
not yet issued financial statements, including interim financial statements,
in
the period of adoption. We adopted the provisions of FIN 48 on January 1, 2007.
Since we had no unrecognized tax benefits, we recognized no additional liability
or reduction in deferred tax asset as a result of the adoption of FIN 48. We
are
no longer subject to U. S. federal, state, local or non-U.S. income tax
examinations by tax authorities for years prior to 2003.
In
September 2006, FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No.
157,
“Fair Value Measurements” (“SFAS 157”). SFAS 157 establishes a separate
framework for determining fair values of assets and liabilities that are
required by other authoritative GAAP pronouncements to be measured at fair
value. In addition, SFAS 157 incorporates and clarifies the guidance in FASB
Concepts Statement 7 regarding the use of present value techniques in measuring
fair value. SFAS 157 does not require any new fair value measurements. SFAS
157
is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after
November 15, 2007. The adoption of SFAS 157 had no impact on our financial
statements or results of operations but did require additional disclosures.
(See
Note 3, “Fair Value”).
8
In
February 2007, FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No.
159,
“The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Liabilities” (“SFAS 159”). SFAS
159 permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain
other items at fair value with changes in fair value included in current
earnings. The election is made on specified election dates, can be made on
an
instrument-by- instrument basis, and is irrevocable. SFAS 159 is effective
for
financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007.
The adoption of SFAS 159 had no impact on our financial statements or results
of
operations as we did not elect to apply SFAS 159 to any eligible
items.
In
December 2007, the FASB issued Revised Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 141R, “Business Combinations” (“SFAS 141R”), a replacement of
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 141, “Business Combinations”.
SFAS 141R provides revised guidance on how an acquirer recognizes and measures
in its financial statements the identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities
assumed, and any noncontrolling interest in the acquiree. In addition, it
provides revised guidance on the recognition and measurement of goodwill
acquired in the business combination. SFAS 141R also provides guidance specific
to the recognition, classification, and measurement of assets and liabilities
related to insurance and reinsurance contracts acquired in a business
combination. SFAS 141R applies to business combinations for acquisitions
occurring on or after January 1, 2009. We do not expect the provisions of SFAS
141R to have a material effect on our results of operations, financial position
or liquidity. However, SFAS 141R will impact the accounting for any future
acquisitions.
In
December 2007, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No.
160, “Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements—an amendment
of Accounting Research Bulletin No. 51” (“SFAS 160”). SFAS 160 amends Accounting
Research Bulletin No. 51 to establish accounting and reporting standards for
the
noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a
subsidiary. In addition, it clarifies that a noncontrolling interest in a
subsidiary is an ownership interest in the consolidated entity that should
be
reported as a component of equity in the consolidated financial statements.
SFAS
160 is effective on a prospective basis beginning January 1, 2009, except for
the presentation and disclosure requirements which are applied on a
retrospective basis for all periods presented. We do not expect the provisions
of SFAS 160 to have a material effect on our results of operations, financial
position or liquidity.
3.
Fair Value
SFAS 157
defines fair value, establishes a consistent framework for measuring fair value
and expands disclosure requirements about fair value measurements.
SFAS 157, among other things, requires us to maximize the use of observable
inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value.
In
addition, SFAS 157 precludes the use of block discounts when measuring the
fair value of instruments traded in an active market, which were previously
applied to large holdings of publicly traded equity securities. It also requires
recognition of trade-date gains related to certain derivative transactions
whose
fair value has been determined using unobservable market inputs. This guidance
supersedes the guidance in Emerging Issues Task Force Issue No. 02-3,
”Issues Involved in Accounting for Derivative Contracts Held for Trading
Purposes and Contracts Involved in Energy Trading and Risk Management
Activities”, which prohibited the recognition of trade-date gains for such
derivative transactions when determining the fair value of instruments not
traded in an active market.
9
Assets
and Liabilities Recorded at Fair Value on a Recurring
Basis
Effective
January 1, 2008, we determine the fair value of our financial instruments based
on the fair value hierarchy established in SFAS 157 which requires an entity
to
maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable
inputs. Observable inputs reflect market data obtained from independent sources,
while unobservable inputs reflect our market assumptions. In accordance with
SFAS 157, these two types of inputs have created the following fair value
hierarchy:
·
|
Level
1: quoted prices in active markets for identical assets;
|
·
|
Level
2: inputs to the valuation methodology include quoted prices for
similar
assets and liabilities in active markets, inputs of identical assets
for
less active markets, and inputs that are observable for the asset
or
liability, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full
term
of the instrument; and
|
·
|
Level
3: inputs to the valuation methodology are unobservable for the asset
or
liability.
|
This
hierarchy requires the use of observable market data when available.
Under
SFAS 157, we determine fair value based on the price that would be received
for
an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between
market participants on the measurement date. It is our policy to maximize the
use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when
developing fair value measurements, in accordance with the fair value hierarchy
described above. Fair value measurements for assets and liabilities where there
exists limited or no observable market data are calculated based upon our
pricing policy, the economic and competitive environment, the characteristics
of
the asset or liability and other factors as appropriate. These estimated fair
values may not be realized upon actual sale or immediate settlement of the
asset
or liability.
Where
quoted prices are available on active exchanges for identical instruments,
investment securities are classified within Level 1 of the valuation hierarchy.
Level 1 investment securities include common and preferred stock. If quoted
prices are not available from active exchanges for identical instruments, then
fair values are estimated using quoted prices from less active markets, quoted
prices of securities with similar characteristics or by pricing models utilizing
other significant observable inputs. Examples of such instruments, which would
generally be classified within Level 2 of the valuation hierarchy, include
corporate bonds, municipal bonds and U.S. Treasury securities. In cases where
there is limited activity or less transparency around inputs to the valuation,
investment securities are classified within Level 3 of the valuation hierarchy.
Level 3 investments are valued based on the best available data in order to
approximate fair value. This data may be internally developed and consider
risk
premiums that a market participant would require. Investment securities
classified within Level 3 include other less liquid investment
securities.
10
The
following table presents for each of the fair value hierarchy levels, our assets
that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis at June 30, 2008 (in
thousands).
Quoted Prices in
|
Other
|
||||||||||||
Active Markets for
|
Observable
|
Unobservable
|
|||||||||||
Identical Assets
|
Inputs
|
Inputs
|
|||||||||||
(Level 1)
|
(Level 2)
|
(Level 3)
|
Total
|
||||||||||
Debt
securities
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
164,137
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
164,137
|
|||||
Equity
securities
|
51,694
|
-
|
-
|
51,694
|
|||||||||
Short-term
investments
|
-
|
121,440
|
-
|
121,440
|
|||||||||
Total
|
$
|
51,694
|
$
|
285,577
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
337,271
|
The
following table summarizes the changes in fair value for all financial assets
measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable
inputs (Level 3) during the six months ended June 30, 2008 (in thousands).
Beginning
balance as of January 1, 2008
|
$
|
4,000
|
||
Purchases,
issuances, sales and settlements
|
(4,000
|
)
|
||
Total
realized/unrealized gains/(losses) included in net income
|
-
|
|||
Net
gains/(losses) included on other comprehensive income
|
-
|
|||
Transfers
in and/or out of Level 3
|
-
|
|||
Ending
balance as of June 30, 2008
|
$
|
-
|
4.
Investments
We
complete a detailed analysis each quarter to assess whether any decline in
the
fair value of any investment below cost is deemed other-than-temporary. All
securities with an unrealized loss are reviewed. Unless other factors cause
us
to reach a contrary conclusion, investments with a fair market value
significantly less than cost for more than 180 days are deemed to have a decline
in value that is other-than-temporary. A decline in value that is considered
to
be other-than-temporary is charged to earnings based on the fair value of the
security at the time of assessment, resulting in a new cost basis for the
security.
11
The
following schedules summarize the gross unrealized losses showing the length
of
time that investments have been continuously in an unrealized loss position
as
of June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007:
As
of June 30, 2008
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Less than 12 months
|
|
12 months or longer
|
|
Total
|
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
||||||
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
Losses
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
Losses
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
Losses
|
|
||||||
Corporate
debt securities
|
$
|
18,036
|
$
|
708
|
$
|
21,958
|
$
|
1,775
|
$
|
39,994
|
$
|
2,483
|
|||||||
Municipal
bonds
|
74,537
|
1,589
|
4,508
|
89
|
79,045
|
1,678
|
|||||||||||||
Equity
securities
|
29,569
|
3,044
|
-
|
-
|
29,569
|
3,044
|
|||||||||||||
Short
term securities
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||||||
Total
|
$
|
122,142
|
$
|
5,341
|
$
|
26,466
|
$
|
1,864
|
$
|
148,608
|
$
|
7,205
|
As
of December 31, 2007
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Less than 12 months
|
|
12 months or longer
|
|
Total
|
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
||||||
|
|
Fair
Value
|
|
Losses
|
|
Fair
Value
|
|
Losses
|
|
Fair
Value
|
|
Losses
|
|||||||
Corporate
debt securities
|
$
|
19,021
|
$
|
840
|
$
|
18,329
|
$
|
896
|
$
|
37,350
|
$
|
1,736
|
|||||||
Municipal
bonds
|
24,392
|
122
|
7,780
|
130
|
32,172
|
252
|
|||||||||||||
Equity
securities
|
6,954
|
318
|
-
|
-
|
6,954
|
318
|
|||||||||||||
Short
term securities
|
352
|
1
|
-
|
-
|
352
|
1
|
|||||||||||||
Total
|
$
|
50,719
|
$
|
1,281
|
$
|
26,109
|
$
|
1,026
|
$
|
76,828
|
$
|
2,307
|
Of
the
gross unrealized loss at June 30, 2008, $1.9 million is more than twelve months
old, consisting of 16 bond positions. Of the gross unrealized loss at December
31, 2007, $1.0 million is more than twelve months old, consisting of 22 bond
positions. We consider these losses as a temporary decline in value as they
are
predominately on bonds where we believe we have the ability to hold our
positions until maturity and whose decline in fair value is driven by interest
rate increases. We see no other indications that the decline in values of these
securities is other than temporary.
5.
Business Combinations
We
account for business combinations using the purchase method of accounting.
The
cost of an acquired entity is allocated to the assets acquired (including
identified intangible assets) and liabilities assumed based on their estimated
fair values. The excess of the cost of an acquired entity over the net of the
amounts assigned to assets acquired and liabilities assumed is an asset referred
to as “excess of cost over net assets acquired” or “goodwill.” Indirect and
general expenses related to business combinations are expensed as incurred.
6.
Pledged Investments
We
have
certain of our securities pledged for the benefit of various state insurance
departments and reinsurers. These securities are included with our
available-for-sale debt securities because we have the ability to trade these
securities. We retain the interest earned on these securities. These securities
had a carrying value of $17.5 million at June 30, 2008 and a carrying value
of
$18.5 million at December 31, 2007.
12
7.
Share-Based Payment Arrangements
Our
2005
Long Term Incentive Plan (“2005 LTIP”) is a stock compensation plan for key
employees and non-employee directors that was approved by the shareholders
on
May 26, 2005. There are 1,500,000 shares authorized for issuance under the
2005
LTIP. Our 1994 Key Employee Long Term Incentive Plan (the “1994 Employee Plan”)
and 1994 Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan (the “1994 Director Plan”) both
expired in 2004 but have unexercised options outstanding.
As
of
June 30, 2008, there were incentive stock options to purchase 927,499 shares
of
our common stock outstanding and non-qualified stock options to purchase 60,000
shares of our common stock outstanding under the 2005 LTIP, leaving 512,501
shares reserved for future issuance. As of June 30, 2008, there were incentive
stock options to purchase 52,299 shares outstanding under the 1994 Employee
Plan
and non-qualified stock options to purchase 20,834 shares outstanding under
the
1994 Director Plan. In addition, as of June 30, 2008, there were outstanding
non-qualified stock options to purchase 16,666 shares of our common stock
granted to certain non-employee directors outside the 1994 Director Plan in
lieu
of fees for service on our board of directors in 1999. The exercise price of
all
such outstanding stock options is equal to the fair market value of our common
stock on the date of grant.
Options
granted under the 1994 Employee Plan prior to October 31, 2003, vest 40% six
months from the date of grant and an additional 20% on each of the first three
anniversary dates of the grant and terminate ten years from the date of grant.
Incentive stock options granted under the 2005 LTIP and the 1994 Employee Plan
after October 31, 2003, vest 10%, 20%, 30% and 40% on the first, second, third
and fourth anniversary dates of the grant, respectively, and terminate five
to
ten years from the date of grant. Non-qualified stock options granted under
the
2005 LTIP vest 100% six months after the date of grant and terminate ten years
from the date of grant. All non-qualified stock options granted under the 1994
Director Plan vested 40% six months from the date of grant and an additional
10%
on each of the first six anniversary dates of the grant and terminate ten years
from the date of grant. The options granted to non-employee directors outside
the 1994 Director Plan fully vested six months after the date of grant and
terminate ten years from the date of grant.
During
the first quarter of 2008, we determined our previous recognition of
compensation expense on share based arrangements did not conform to GAAP. As
a
result, we corrected our calculation to properly record compensation expense
on
a straight line basis over the requisite service period for the entire award
in
accordance with SFAS No. 123R “Share-Based Payment”. The cumulative impact of
this correction was recorded during the first quarter of 2008 resulting in
additional compensation expense of approximately $354 thousand which is not
considered to have a material impact on our financial position or results of
operations.
13
A
summary
of the status of our stock options as of and changes during the year-to-date
ended June 30, 2008 is presented below:
Average
|
Contractual
|
Intrinsic
|
|||||||||||
Number of
|
Exercise
|
Term
|
Value
|
||||||||||
Shares
|
Price
|
(Years)
|
($000)
|
||||||||||
Outstanding
at January 1, 2008
|
848,000
|
$
|
10.41
|
||||||||||
Granted
|
270,000
|
$
|
11.46
|
||||||||||
Exercised
|
(40,702
|
)
|
$
|
3.54
|
|||||||||
Forfeited
or expired
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
||||||||||
Outstanding
at June 30, 2008
|
1,077,298
|
$
|
11.20
|
8.3
|
$
|
786
|
|||||||
Exercisable
at June 30, 2008
|
261,549
|
$
|
8.15
|
5.8
|
$
|
696
|
The
following table details the intrinsic value of options exercised, total cost
of
share-based payments charged against income before income tax benefit and the
amount of related income tax benefit recognized in income for the periods
indicated (in thousands):
Three Months Ended
|
Six Months Ended
|
||||||||||||
June 30,
|
June 30,
|
||||||||||||
2008
|
2007
|
2008
|
2007
|
||||||||||
Intrinsic
value of options exercised
|
$
|
59
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
337
|
$
|
-
|
|||||
Cost
of share-based payments (non-cash)
|
$
|
226
|
$
|
102
|
$
|
773
|
$
|
153
|
|||||
Income
tax benefit of share-based
|
|||||||||||||
payments
recognized in income
|
$
|
79
|
$
|
36
|
$
|
270
|
$
|
54
|
As
of
June 30, 2008 there was $3.1 million of total unrecognized compensation cost
related to non-vested share-based compensation arrangements granted under our
plans, of which $0.6 million is expected to be recognized in the remainder
of
2008, $1.0 million is expected to be recognized in 2009, $0.9 million is
expected to be recognized in 2010, $0.5 million is expected to be recognized
in
2011 and $0.1 million is expected to be recognized in 2012.
The
fair
value of each stock option granted is estimated on the date of grant using
the
Black-Scholes option pricing model. Expected volatilities are based on the
historical volatility of similar companies' common stock for a period equal
to the expected term. The risk- free interest rates for periods within the
contractual term of the options are based on rates for U.S. Treasury Notes
with
maturity dates corresponding to the options’ expected lives on the dates of
grant. Expected term is determined base on the simplified method as the Company
does not have sufficient historical exercise data to provide a basis for
estimating the expected term.
14
The
following table details the weighted average grant date fair value and related
assumptions for the periods indicated:
Three
Months Ended
|
Six
Months Ended
|
||||||||||||
June
30,
|
June
30,
|
||||||||||||
2008
|
2007
|
2008
|
2007
|
||||||||||
Grant
date fair value per share
|
$
|
4.74
|
$
|
4.04
|
$
|
4.74
|
$
|
4.04
|
|||||
Expected
term (in years)
|
6.4
|
6.4
|
6.4
|
6.4
|
|||||||||
Expected
volatility
|
35.0
|
%
|
19.4
|
%
|
35.0
|
%
|
19.4
|
%
|
|||||
Risk
free interest rate
|
3.4
|
%
|
4.5
|
%
|
3.4
|
%
|
4.5
|
%
|
8.
Segment Information
The
following is business segment information for the three and six months ended
June 30, 2008 and 2007 (in thousands):
Three Months Ended
|
Six Months Ended
|
||||||||||||
June 30,
|
June 30,
|
||||||||||||
2008
|
2007
|
2008
|
2007
|
||||||||||
Revenues:
|
|||||||||||||
Standard
Commercial Segment
|
$
|
22,157
|
$
|
20,003
|
$
|
43,986
|
$
|
41,770
|
|||||
Specialty
Commercial Segment
|
31,988
|
32,978
|
64,075
|
61,076
|
|||||||||
Personal
Segment
|
16,498
|
14,696
|
32,224
|
28,469
|
|||||||||
Corporate
|
1,020
|
1,059
|
2,571
|
1,379
|
|||||||||
Consolidated
|
$
|
71,663
|
$
|
68,736
|
$
|
142,856
|
$
|
132,694
|
|||||
Pre-tax
income (loss):
|
|||||||||||||
Standard
Commercial Segment
|
$
|
3,984
|
$
|
2,664
|
$
|
7,865
|
$
|
5,423
|
|||||
Specialty
Commercial Segment
|
6,265
|
9,441
|
11,558
|
14,127
|
|||||||||
Personal
Segment
|
1,913
|
2,176
|
4,503
|
4,294
|
|||||||||
Corporate
|
(1,895
|
)
|
(1,349
|
)
|
(3,193
|
)
|
(3,199
|
)
|
|||||
Consolidated
|
$
|
10,267
|
$
|
12,932
|
$
|
20,733
|
$
|
20,645
|
15
The
following is additional business segment information as of the dates indicated
(in thousands):
June 30,
|
December 31,
|
||||||
2008
|
2007
|
||||||
Assets
|
|||||||
Standard
Commercial Segment
|
$
|
163,521
|
$
|
211,428
|
|||
Specialty
Commercial Segment
|
202,692
|
229,138
|
|||||
Personal
Segment
|
75,710
|
100,986
|
|||||
Corporate
|
96,617
|
64,762
|
|||||
$
|
538,540
|
$
|
606,314
|
9.
Reinsurance
We
reinsure a portion of the risk we underwrite in order to control the exposure
to
losses and to protect capital resources. We cede to reinsurers a portion of
these risks and pay premiums based upon the risk and exposure of the policies
subject to such reinsurance. Ceded reinsurance involves credit risk and is
generally subject to aggregate loss limits. Although the reinsurer is liable
to
us to the extent of the reinsurance ceded, we are ultimately liable as the
direct insurer on all risks reinsured. Reinsurance recoverables are reported
after allowances for uncollectible amounts. We monitor the financial condition
of reinsurers on an ongoing basis and review our reinsurance arrangements
periodically. Reinsurers are selected based on their financial condition,
business practices and the price of their product offerings. Refer to Note
5 of
our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 for more
discussion of our reinsurance.
The
following table shows earned premiums ceded and reinsurance loss recoveries
by
period (in thousands):
Three Months Ended
|
Six Months Ended
|
||||||||||||
June 30,
|
June 30,
|
||||||||||||
2008
|
2007
|
2008
|
2007
|
||||||||||
Ceded
earned premiums
|
$
|
2,312
|
$
|
4,144
|
$
|
4,622
|
$
|
8,024
|
|||||
Reinsurance
recoveries
|
$
|
1,156
|
$
|
2,349
|
$
|
1,263
|
$
|
3,433
|
10.
Notes Payable
On
June
21, 2005, an unconsolidated trust subsidiary completed a private placement
of
$30.0 million of 30-year floating rate trust preferred securities.
Simultaneously, we borrowed $30.9 million from the trust subsidiary and
contributed $30.0 million to one of our insurance company subsidiaries in order
to increase policyholder surplus. The note bears an initial interest rate of
7.725% until June 15, 2015, at which time interest will adjust quarterly to
the
three-month LIBOR rate plus 3.25 percentage points. Under the terms of the
note,
we pay interest only each quarter and the principal of the note at maturity.
As
of June 30, 2008, the note balance was $30.9 million.
16
On
January 27, 2006, we borrowed $15.0 million under our revolving credit facility
to fund the cash required to close the acquisition of the subsidiaries
comprising our TGA Operating Unit. As of June 30, 2008, the balance on the
revolving note was $2.8 million, which currently bears interest at 4.69% per
annum. Also included in notes payable is $1.1 million outstanding as of June
30,
2008 under PAAC’s revolving credit sub-facility, which also currently bears
interest at 4.69% per annum. (See Note 12, “Credit Facilities”).
On
August
23, 2007, an unconsolidated trust subsidiary completed a private placement
of
$25.0 million of 30-year floating rate trust preferred securities.
Simultaneously, we borrowed $25.8 million from the trust subsidiary for working
capital and general corporate purposes. The note bears an initial interest
rate
at 8.28% until September 15, 2017, at which time interest will adjust quarterly
to the three-month LIBOR rate plus 2.90 percentage points. Under the terms
of
the note, we pay interest only each quarter and the principal of the note at
maturity. As of June 30, 2008 the note balance was $25.8 million.
11.
Structured Settlements
In
connection with the acquisition of the subsidiaries comprising our TGA Operating
Unit, we recorded a payable for future guaranteed payments of $25.0 million
discounted at 4.4%, the rate of two-year U.S. Treasuries (the only investment
permitted on the trust account securing such future payments). As of June 30,
2008 we had fully repaid our obligation to the sellers.
12.
Credit Facilities
On
June
29, 2005, we entered into a credit facility with The Frost National Bank. The
credit facility was amended and restated on January 27, 2006 to a $20.0 million
revolving credit facility, with a $5.0 million letter of credit sub-facility.
The credit facility was further amended effective May 31, 2007 to increase
the
revolving credit facility to $25.0 million and establish a new $5.0 million
revolving credit sub-facility for the premium finance operations of PAAC. The
credit agreement was again amended effective February 20, 2008 to extend the
termination to January 27, 2010, revise various affirmative and negative
covenants and decrease the interest rate in most instances to the three month
Eurodollar rate plus 1.90 percentage points, payable quarterly in arrears.
We
pay letter of credit fees at the rate of 1.00% per annum. Our obligations under
the revolving credit facility are secured by a security interest in the capital
stock of all of our subsidiaries, guaranties of all of our subsidiaries and
the
pledge of substantially all of our assets. The revolving credit facility
contains covenants which, among other things, require us to maintain certain
financial and operating ratios and restrict certain distributions, transactions
and organizational changes. As of June 30, 2008, we were in compliance with
all
of our covenants. (See Note 10, “Notes Payable”).
17
13.
Deferred Policy Acquisition Costs
The
following table shows total deferred and amortized policy acquisition costs
by
period (in thousands):
Three Months Ended
|
Six Months Ended
|
||||||||||||
June 30,
|
June 30,
|
||||||||||||
2008
|
2007
|
2008
|
2007
|
||||||||||
Deferred
|
$
|
(13,613
|
)
|
$
|
(12,606
|
)
|
$
|
(28,018
|
)
|
$
|
(24,966
|
)
|
|
Amortized
|
13,377
|
11,321
|
27,123
|
21,897
|
|||||||||
Net
|
$
|
(236
|
)
|
$
|
(1,285
|
)
|
$
|
(895
|
)
|
$
|
(3,069
|
)
|
14.
Earnings per Share
The
following table sets forth basic and diluted weighted average shares outstanding
for the periods indicated (in thousands):
Three Months Ended
|
Six Months Ended
|
||||||||||||
June 30,
|
June 30,
|
||||||||||||
2008
|
2007
|
2008
|
2007
|
||||||||||
Weighted
average shares - basic
|
20,806
|
20,768
|
20,794
|
20,768
|
|||||||||
Effect
of dilutive securities
|
78
|
-
|
91
|
-
|
|||||||||
Weighted
average shares - assuming dilution
|
20,884
|
20,768
|
20,885
|
20,768
|
For
the
three and six months ended June 30, 2008 , 899,167 shares of common stock
potentially issuable upon the exercise of employee stock options were excluded
from the weighted average number of shares outstanding on a diluted basis
because the effect of such options would be anti-dilutive. For the three and
six
months ended June 30, 2007, 500,000 shares of common stock potentially issuable
upon exercise of employee stock options were excluded from the weighted average
number of shares outstanding on a diluted basis because the effect of such
options would be anti-dilutive.
15.
Net Periodic Pension Cost
The
following table details the net periodic pension cost incurred by period (in
thousands):
Three Months Ended
|
Six Months Ended
|
||||||||||||
June 30,
|
June 30,
|
||||||||||||
2008
|
2007
|
2008
|
2007
|
||||||||||
Interest
cost
|
$
|
167
|
$
|
180
|
$
|
334
|
$
|
360
|
|||||
Amortization
of net (gain) loss
|
(167
|
)
|
50
|
(335
|
)
|
100
|
|||||||
Expected
return on plan assets
|
16
|
(160
|
)
|
32
|
(321
|
)
|
|||||||
Net
periodic pension cost
|
$
|
16
|
$
|
70
|
$
|
31
|
$
|
139
|
18
We
contributed $152 thousand and $196 thousand to our frozen defined benefit cash
balance plan (“Cash Balance Plan”) during the three months ended June 30, 2008
and 2007, respectively. We contributed $236 thousand and $270 thousand to our
Cash Balance Plan during the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007,
respectively. Refer to Note 13 to the consolidated financial statements in
our
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 for more
discussion of our retirement plans.
16.
Contingencies
We
are
engaged in legal proceedings in the ordinary course of business, none of which,
either individually or in the aggregate, are believed likely to have a material
adverse effect on our consolidated financial position or results of operations,
in the opinion of management. The various legal proceedings to which we are
a
party are routine in nature and incidental to our business.
Item
2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results
of
Operations.
The
following discussion should be read together with our consolidated financial
statements and the notes thereto. This discussion contains forward-looking
statements. Please see “Risks Associated with Forward-Looking Statements in this
Form 10-Q” for a discussion of some of the uncertainties, risks and assumptions
associated with these statements.
Introduction
Hallmark
Financial Services, Inc. (“Hallmark” and, together with subsidiaries, “we,” “us”
or “our”) is an insurance holding company which, through its subsidiaries,
engages in the sale of property/casualty insurance products to businesses and
individuals. Our business involves marketing, distributing, underwriting and
servicing commercial insurance, non-standard automobile insurance and general
aviation insurance, as well as providing other insurance related services.
Our
business is geographically concentrated in the south central and northwest
regions of the United States, except for our general aviation business which
is
written on a national basis. We
pursue
our business activities through subsidiaries whose operations are organized
into
four operating units which are supported by our insurance company
subsidiaries.
Our
non-carrier insurance activities are segregated by operating units into the
following reportable segments:
·
|
Standard
Commercial Segment.
Our Standard Commercial Segment includes the standard lines commercial
property/casualty insurance products and services handled by our
HGA
Operating Unit which is comprised of our American Hallmark Insurance
Services, Inc. and Effective Claims Management, Inc. subsidiaries.
|
·
|
Specialty
Commercial Segment.
Our Specialty Commercial Segment includes the excess and surplus
lines
commercial property/casualty insurance products and services handled
by
our TGA Operating Unit and the general aviation insurance products
and
services handled by our Aerospace Operating Unit. Our TGA Operating
Unit
is comprised of our TGA Insurance Managers, Inc., Pan American Acceptance
Corporation (“PAAC”) and TGA Special Risk, Inc. subsidiaries. Our
Aerospace Operating Unit is comprised of our Aerospace Insurance
Managers,
Inc., Aerospace Special Risk, Inc. and Aerospace Claims Management
Group,
Inc. subsidiaries.
|
19
·
|
Personal
Segment.
Our Personal Segment includes the non-standard personal automobile
insurance products and services handled by our Phoenix Operating
Unit
which is comprised solely of American Hallmark General Agency, Inc.,
which
does business as Phoenix Indemnity Insurance
Company.
|
The
retained premium produced by our operating units is supported by the following
insurance company subsidiaries:
·
|
American
Hallmark Insurance Company of Texas (“AHIC”) presently
retains all of the risks on the commercial property/casualty policies
marketed by our HGA Operating Unit, retains a portion of the risks
on the
non-standard personal automobile policies marketed by our Phoenix
Operating Unit, assumes a portion of the risks on the commercial
property/casualty policies marketed by our TGA Operating Unit and
assumes
a portion of the risks on the aviation property/casualty products
marketed
by our Aerospace Operating Unit.
|
·
|
Hallmark
Specialty Insurance Company (“HSIC”) presently
assumes a portion of the risks on the commercial property/casualty
policies marketed by our TGA Operating
Unit.
|
·
|
Hallmark
Insurance Company (“HIC”) (formerly known as Phoenix Indemnity Insurance
Company)
presently assumes a portion of the risks on the non-standard personal
automobile policies marketed by our Phoenix Operating Unit and assumes
a
portion of the risks on the aviation property/casualty products marketed
by our Aerospace Operating Unit.
|
Effective
January 1, 2006, our insurance company subsidiaries entered into a pooling
arrangement, which was subsequently amended on December 15, 2006, pursuant
to
which AHIC retains 46% of the total net premiums written by all of our operating
units, HIC retains 34% of our total net premiums written and HSIC retains 20%
of
our total net premiums written. This pooling arrangement had no impact on our
consolidated financial statements under GAAP.
Results
of Operations
Management
Overview. During
the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, our total revenues were $71.7
and
$142.9 million, representing a 4% and 8% increase over the $68.7 million and
$132.7 in total revenues, respectively, for the same periods of 2007. Increased
earned premium due to increased retention of business produced by our Specialty
Commercial Segment, and increased production by our Personal Segment were the
primary causes of the increase in revenue. Standard Commercial Segment revenues
increased $2.2 million, or 11% and 5%, during the three and six months ended
June 30, 2008 as compared to the same periods during 2007, due primarily to
increased contingent commissions related to favorable loss development on prior
accident years. Specialty Commercial Segment revenues decreased $1.0 million
and
increased $3.0 million, during the three months and six months ended June 30,
2008 as compared to the same periods of 2007, due to lower commission income
primarily as a result of the continued shift from a third-party agency model
to
an underwriting model, partially offset by increased net premiums earned as
a
result of the increased retention of business. Revenues from our Personal
Segment increased $1.8 million and $3.8 million, or 12% and 13%, during the
three and six months ended June 30, 2008 as compared to the same periods during
2007, due largely to geographic expansion into new states. Corporate revenue
of
$1.0 million remained relatively unchanged for the second quarter of 2008 as
compared to the same period in 2007. Corporate revenue increased $1.2 million
for the six months ended June 30, 2008 primarily due to increased recognized
gains on our investment portfolio of $0.2 million and increased investment
income of $1.0 million due to changes in capital allocation.
20
We
reported net income of $7.2 million and $14.3 million for the three and six
months ended June 30, 2008, which was $1.6 million lower and $0.5 million higher
than the $8.8 million and $13.8 million reported for the same periods in 2007.
On a diluted basis per share, net income was $0.34 and $0.68 per share,
respectively, for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2008 as
compared to $0.42 and $0.66 per share for the same periods in 2007. The decrease
in net income for the three months was primarily attributable to favorable
loss
development on prior accident years during the second quarter of 2008 of $0.3
million as compared to $1.9 million for the same period during 2007. The year
to
date increase in net income was primarily attributable to a lower effective
tax
rate from a higher amount of tax exempt bonds in our investment portfolio in
2008 than we held in 2007. Year to date 2008 pre tax income increased $0.1
million to $20.7 million from the prior year. Increased revenue, as discussed
above, was partially offset by increased incurred loss and loss adjustment
expense of $8.6 million, increased interest expense of $0.8 million from our
issuance of trust preferred securities in the third quarter of 2007 and
increased operating expense of $0.6 million.
21
Second
Quarter 2008 as Compared to Second Quarter 2007
The
following is additional business segment information for the three months ended
June 30, 2008 and 2007 (in thousands):
Hallmark
Financial Services, Inc.
Consolidated
Segment Data
Three Months Ended June 30, 2008
|
||||||||||||||||
Standard
|
|
Specialty
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
Commercial
|
|
Commercial
|
|
Personal
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
Segment
|
|
Segment
|
|
Segment
|
|
Corporate
|
|
Consolidated
|
||||||
Produced
premium (1)
|
$
|
21,624
|
$
|
35,986
|
$
|
14,153
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
71,763
|
||||||
Gross
premiums written
|
21,624
|
27,338
|
14,153
|
-
|
63,115
|
|||||||||||
Ceded
premiums written
|
(1,382
|
)
|
(945
|
)
|
-
|
-
|
(2,327
|
)
|
||||||||
Net
premiums written
|
20,242
|
26,393
|
14,153
|
-
|
60,788
|
|||||||||||
Change
in unearned premiums
|
36
|
(2,395
|
)
|
1,014
|
-
|
(1,345
|
)
|
|||||||||
Net
premiums earned
|
20,278
|
23,998
|
15,167
|
-
|
59,443
|
|||||||||||
Total
revenues
|
22,157
|
31,988
|
16,498
|
1,020
|
71,663
|
|||||||||||
Losses
and loss adjustment expenses
|
11,669
|
13,976
|
10,384
|
-
|
36,029
|
|||||||||||
Pre-tax
income (loss)
|
3,984
|
6,265
|
1,913
|
(1,895
|
)
|
10,267
|
||||||||||
Net
loss ratio (2)
|
57.5
|
%
|
58.2
|
%
|
68.5
|
%
|
60.6
|
%
|
||||||||
Net
expense ratio (2)
|
27.3
|
%
|
30.7
|
%
|
21.6
|
%
|
29.2
|
%
|
||||||||
Net
combined ratio (2)
|
84.8
|
%
|
88.9
|
%
|
90.1
|
%
|
89.8
|
%
|
Three Months Ended June 30, 2007
|
||||||||||||||||
Standard
|
|
Specialty
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
Commercial
|
|
Commercial
|
|
Personal
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
Segment
|
|
Segment
|
|
Segment
|
|
Corporate
|
|
Consolidated
|
||||||
Produced
premium (1)
|
$
|
24,751
|
$
|
40,956
|
$
|
13,298
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
79,005
|
||||||
Gross
premiums written
|
24,740
|
28,540
|
13,297
|
-
|
66,577
|
|||||||||||
Ceded
premiums written
|
(2,804
|
)
|
(1,477
|
)
|
-
|
-
|
(4,281
|
)
|
||||||||
Net
premiums written
|
21,936
|
27,063
|
13,297
|
-
|
62,296
|
|||||||||||
Change
in unearned premiums
|
(1,731
|
)
|
(5,474
|
)
|
219
|
-
|
(6,986
|
)
|
||||||||
Net
premiums earned
|
20,205
|
21,589
|
13,516
|
-
|
55,310
|
|||||||||||
Total
revenues
|
20,003
|
32,978
|
14,696
|
1,059
|
68,736
|
|||||||||||
Losses
and loss adjustment expenses
|
11,267
|
10,635
|
8,813
|
(3
|
)
|
30,712
|
||||||||||
Pre-tax
income (loss)
|
2,664
|
9,441
|
2,176
|
(1,349
|
)
|
12,932
|
||||||||||
Net
loss ratio (2)
|
55.8
|
%
|
49.3
|
%
|
65.2
|
%
|
55.5
|
%
|
||||||||
Net
expense ratio (2)
|
27.0
|
%
|
32.0
|
%
|
22.8
|
%
|
27.9
|
%
|
||||||||
Net
combined ratio (2)
|
82.8
|
%
|
81.3
|
%
|
88.0
|
%
|
83.4
|
%
|
(1) |
Produced
premium is a non-GAAP measurement that management uses to track total
controlled premium produced by our operations. We believe this is
a useful
tool
for users of our financial statements to measure our premium production
whether retained by our insurance company subsidiaries or retained
by
third party insurance carriers where we receive commission
revenue.
|
(2) |
The
net loss ratio is calculated as incurred losses and loss adjustment
expenses divided by net premiums earned, each determined in accordance
with GAAP. The net expense ratio is calculated as total underwriting
expenses of our insurance company subsidiaries, including allocated
overhead expenses and offset by agency fee income, divided by net
premiums
earned, each determined in accordance with GAAP. Net combined ratio
is
calculated as the sum of the net loss ratio and the net expense
ratio.
|
22
Standard
Commercial Segment
Gross
premiums written for the Standard Commercial Segment were $21.6 million for
the
three months ended June 30, 2008, which was $3.1 million less than the $24.7
million for the three months ended June 30, 2007. Net premiums written were
$20.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2008 as compared to the $21.9
million reported for the same period in 2007. The primary reasons for the
decline in premiums were increased competition and rate pressure in the standard
commercial markets.
Total
revenue for the Standard Commercial Segment was $22.2 million for the three
months ended June 30, 2008 as compared to $20.0 million for the same period
in
2007. This $2.2 million increase was due primarily to increased contingent
commissions of $2.1 million related to favorable loss development on prior
accident years during the second quarter of 2008 as compared to the same period
for 2007. Net premiums earned increased $0.1 million for the quarter due to
the
upward trend of net premium written in 2007 as compared to the flat net written
premium trend in 2008.
Pre-tax
income for our Standard Commercial Segment of $4.0 million for the second
quarter of 2008 increased $1.3 million from the $2.7 million reported for the
second quarter of 2007. Increased revenue as discussed above was the primary
reason for the increase in pre-tax income, partially offset by higher losses
and
loss adjustment expense of $0.4 million for the quarter and increased operating
expenses of $0.5 million due to production related costs as well as new hires.
The higher losses and loss adjustment expense is evidenced by a net loss ratio
of 57.5% for the three months ended June 30, 2008 as compared to 55.8% for
the
same period of 2007.
The
net
loss ratio was unfavorably impacted by lower ceded losses of $0.9 for the three
months ended June 30, 2008, as compared to $1.8 million for the same period
the
prior year. The gross loss ratio before reinsurance was 58.1% for the three
months ended June 30, 2008 as compared to 57.3% for the same period the prior
year. The gross loss results for the three months ended June 30, 2008 included
$0.4 million of favorable prior year development as compared to favorable loss
development on prior accident years of $0.6 million recognized during the same
period of 2007. The Standard Commercial Segment reported net expense ratios
of
27.3% and 27.0% for the second quarters of 2008 and 2007,
respectively.
Specialty
Commercial Segment
Gross
premiums written for the Specialty Commercial Segment for the second quarter
of
2008 were $27.3 million, which was $1.2 million less than the $28.5 million
reported for the same period in 2007. Net premiums written for the second
quarter of 2008 were $26.4 million, which was $0.7 million less than the $27.1
million reported for the same period in 2007. The decrease in premium volume
was
due to increased competition and rate pressure in both the excess and surplus
and general aviation markets.
Total
revenue for the Specialty Commercial Segment of $32.0 million for the second
quarter of 2008 was $1.0 million less than the $33.0 million reported in the
first quarter of 2007. This 3% decrease in revenue was largely due to lower
commission income of $3.5 million for the quarter primarily as a result of
the
shift from a third party agency structure to an insurance underwriting structure
partially offset by increased net premiums earned of $2.4 million for the
quarter as a result of the increased retention of business and increased net
investment income of $0.1 million.
23
Pre-tax
income for the Specialty Commercial Segment of $6.3 million for the second
quarter of 2008 decreased $3.1 million from the $9.4 million reported for the
same period in 2007. Decreased revenue, discussed above, as well as increased
losses and loss adjustment expenses of $3.3 million were the primary reasons
for
the decrease in pre-tax income, partially offset by lower other operating
expenses of $1.1 million.
The
Specialty Commercial Segment reported a net loss ratio of 58.2% for the second
quarter of 2008 as compared to 49.3% for the second quarter of 2007. Unfavorable
prior accident year development of $0.5 million for the second quarter of 2008
as compared to favorable prior accident year development of $1.4 million during
the same period of 2007 were the primary cause for the increase in net loss
ratio. Absent prior year development, the gross incurred losses and loss
adjustment expense before reinsurance were higher by $1.2 million primarily
due
to increased pricing pressure reflected in our current accident year loss
estimates. The Specialty Commercial Segment reported a net expense ratio of
30.7% for the second quarter of 2008, as compared to 32.0% for the second
quarter of 2007. The decrease in the net expense ratio was primarily due to
increased retention on our catastrophe reinsurance and commercial property
per
risk reinsurance programs during the second quarter of 2008 as compared to
the
second quarter of 2007.
Personal
Segment
Net
premium written for our Personal Segment increased $0.9 million during the
second quarter of 2008 to $14.2 million compared to $13.3 million in the second
quarter of 2007. The increase in net premium was due mostly to continued
geographic expansion.
Total
revenue for the Personal Segment increased 12% to $16.5 million for the second
quarter of 2008 from $14.7 million for the same period in 2007. The primary
reason for the increase was higher earned premium of $1.7 million.
Pre-tax
income for the Personal Segment was $1.9 million for the three months ended
June
30, 2008 as compared to $2.2 million for the same period in 2007. The increased
revenue, as discussed above, was partially offset by increased losses and loss
adjustment expenses of $1.6 million and increased operating expenses of $0.5
million due mostly to production related expenses attributable to the increased
earned premium.
The
Personal Segment reported a net loss ratio of 68.5% for the second quarter
of
2008 as compared to 65.2% for the same period in 2007. A competitive pricing
environment and the new business impact associated with geographic expansion
were the primary reasons for the increase in net loss ratio. We recognized
$0.3
million of favorable prior accident year development in the second quarter
2008
as compared to $0.1 million of unfavorable prior accident year development
in
the second quarter of 2007. The Personal Segment reported a net expense ratio
of
21.6% for the second quarter of 2008 as compared to 22.8% for the second quarter
of 2007. The decrease in the net expense ratio was mainly due to increased
finance charges and fixed overhead allocations in relation to earned
premium.
24
Corporate
Corporate
revenue of $1.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2008 remained
relatively unchanged from the $1.1 million reported for the same period in
2007.
Recognized gains on our investment portfolio decreased $0.6 million and
investment income increased $0.6 million due to changes in capital
allocation.
Corporate
pre-tax loss was $1.9 million for the second quarter of 2008 as compared to
$1.3
million for the same period in 2007. Contributing to the increased loss was
increased interest expense of $0.4 million due primarily to the issuance of
trust preferred securities in August 2007 and increased operating expense of
$0.1 million.
25
Six
Months Ended June 30, 2008 as Compared to Six Months Ended June 30,
2007
The
following is additional business segment information for the six months ended
June 30, 2008 and 2007 (in thousands):
Hallmark
Financial Services, Inc.
Consolidated
Segment Data
Six Months Ended June 30, 2008
|
||||||||||||||||
Standard
|
|
Specialty
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
Commercial
|
|
Commercial
|
|
Personal
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
Segment
|
|
Segment
|
|
Segment
|
|
Corporate
|
|
Consolidated
|
||||||
Produced
premium (1)
|
43,373
|
68,006
|
31,880
|
-
|
143,259
|
|||||||||||
Gross
premiums written
|
43,373
|
52,099
|
31,880
|
-
|
127,352
|
|||||||||||
Ceded
premiums written
|
(2,746
|
)
|
(1,913
|
)
|
-
|
-
|
(4,659
|
)
|
||||||||
Net
premiums written
|
40,627
|
50,186
|
31,880
|
-
|
122,693
|
|||||||||||
Change
in unearned premiums
|
440
|
(2,550
|
)
|
(2,224
|
)
|
(4,334
|
)
|
|||||||||
Net
premiums earned
|
41,067
|
47,636
|
29,656
|
-
|
118,359
|
|||||||||||
Total
revenues
|
43,986
|
64,075
|
32,224
|
2,571
|
142,856
|
|||||||||||
Losses
and loss adjustment expenses
|
22,979
|
28,979
|
19,575
|
-
|
71,533
|
|||||||||||
Pre-tax
income (loss)
|
7,865
|
11,558
|
4,503
|
(3,193
|
)
|
20,733
|
||||||||||
Net
loss ratio (2)
|
56.0
|
%
|
60.8
|
%
|
66.0
|
%
|
60.4
|
%
|
||||||||
Net
expense ratio (2)
|
27.3
|
%
|
30.7
|
%
|
22.0
|
%
|
29.1
|
%
|
||||||||
Net
combined ratio (2)
|
83.3
|
%
|
91.5
|
%
|
88.0
|
%
|
89.5
|
%
|
Six Months Ended June 30, 2007
|
||||||||||||||||
Standard
|
|
Specialty
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
Commercial
|
|
Commercial
|
|
Personal
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
Segment
|
|
Segment
|
|
Segment
|
|
Corporate
|
|
Consolidated
|
||||||
Produced
premium (1)
|
48,301
|
80,313
|
28,374
|
-
|
156,988
|
|||||||||||
Gross
premiums written
|
48,221
|
54,641
|
28,373
|
-
|
131,235
|
|||||||||||
Ceded
premiums written
|
(5,439
|
)
|
(2,729
|
)
|
-
|
-
|
(8,168
|
)
|
||||||||
Net
premiums written
|
42,782
|
51,912
|
28,373
|
-
|
123,067
|
|||||||||||
Change
in unearned premiums
|
(2,655
|
)
|
(11,230
|
)
|
(2,224
|
)
|
-
|
(16,109
|
)
|
|||||||
Net
premiums earned
|
40,127
|
40,682
|
26,149
|
-
|
106,958
|
|||||||||||
Total
revenues
|
41,770
|
61,076
|
28,469
|
1,379
|
132,694
|
|||||||||||
Losses
and loss adjustment expenses
|
24,108
|
21,716
|
17,080
|
(7
|
)
|
62,897
|
||||||||||
Pre-tax
income (loss)
|
5,423
|
14,127
|
4,294
|
(3,199
|
)
|
20,645
|
||||||||||
Net
loss ratio (2)
|
60.1
|
%
|
53.4
|
%
|
65.3
|
%
|
58.8
|
%
|
||||||||
Net
expense ratio (2)
|
27.5
|
%
|
31.8
|
%
|
23.2
|
%
|
28.1
|
%
|
||||||||
Net
combined ratio (2)
|
87.6
|
%
|
85.2
|
%
|
88.5
|
%
|
86.9
|
%
|
(1) |
Produced
premium is a non-GAAP measurement that management uses to track total
controlled premium produced by our operations. We believe this is
a useful
tool for users of our financial statements to measure our premium
production whether retained by our insurance company subsidiaries
or
retained by third party insurance carriers where we receive commission
revenue.
|
(2) |
The
net loss ratio is calculated as incurred losses and loss adjustment
expenses divided by net premiums earned, each determined in accordance
with GAAP. The net expense ratio is calculated as total underwriting
expenses of our insurance company subsidiaries, including allocated
overhead expenses and offset by agency fee income, divided by net
premiums
earned, each determined in accordance with GAAP. Net combined ratio
is
calculated as the sum of the net loss ratio and the net expense
ratio.
|
26
Standard
Commercial Segment
Gross
premiums written for the Standard Commercial Segment were $43.4 million for
the
six months ended June 30, 2008, or 10% less than the $48.2 million reported
for
the same period in 2007. Net premiums written were $40.6 million for the six
months ended June 30, 2008 as compared to $42.8 million reported for the same
period in 2007. Increased competition and rate pressure continue to challenge
premium volume growth in the Standard Commercial Segment.
Total
revenue for the Standard Commercial Segment of $44.0 million for the six months
ended June 30, 2008 was $2.2 million more than the $41.8 million reported during
the six months ended June 30, 2007. This 5% increase in total revenue was
primarily due to increased contingent commissions of $1.4 million related to
favorable loss development on prior accident years during 2008 compared to
the
same period for 2007. Also contributing to this increase in revenues was
increased net premiums earned of $0.9 million and increased net investment
income of $0.2 million. These increases in revenue were partially offset by
lower processing and service fees of $0.3 million, due to the shift from a
third
party agency structure to an insurance underwriting structure.
Pre-tax
income for our Standard Commercial Segment of $7.9 million for the six months
ended June 30, 2008 increased $2.5 million, or 45%, from the $5.4 million
reported for the same period of 2007. This increase in pre-tax income was
primarily attributable to increased revenue discussed above as well as lower
loss and loss adjustment expenses of $1.1 million. These increases were
partially offset by higher operating expenses of $0.9 million primarily due
to
production related expenses related to higher earned premium and new
hires.
The
net
loss ratio for the six months ended June 30, 2008 was 56.0% as compared to
the
60.1% reported for the same period of 2007. The gross loss ratio before
reinsurance was 54.2% for the six months ended June 30, 2008 as compared to
57.5% for the same period the prior year. The gross loss results for the six
months ended June 30, 2008 included $2.2 million of favorable prior year
development as compared to favorable prior year development of $0.6 million
recognized during the same period of 2007. Absent prior year development, the
gross incurred losses and loss adjustment expense before reinsurance for the
Standard Commercial Segment were lower by $0.9 million due to better gross
loss
experience.
The
Standard Commercial Segment reported net expense ratios of 27.3% and 27.5%
for
the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
Specialty
Commercial Segment
Gross
premiums written for the Specialty Commercial Segment for the first six months
of 2008 were $52.1 million, or 5% less than the $54.6 million reported for
the
same period in 2007. Net premiums written for the first six months of 2008
were
$50.2 million or 3% less than the $51.9 million reported for the same period
in
2007. The decrease in premium volume was due to the increased competition and
rate pressure in both the excess and surplus and general aviation markets.
Total
revenue for the Specialty Commercial Segment of $64.1 million for the first
six
months of 2008 was $3.0 million more than the $61.1 million reported in the
first six months of 2007. This 5% increase in revenue was largely due to
increased net premiums earned of $7.0 million for the first six months of 2008
as a result of the increased retention of business. Increased net investment
income contributed an additional $0.3 million to the increase in revenue for
the
quarter. These increases in revenue were partially offset by lower ceding
commission and fee revenue of $4.2 million due primarily to the shift from
a
third party agency structure to an insurance underwriting structure.
27
Pre-tax
income for the Specialty Commercial Segment of $11.6 million for the first
six
months of 2008 decreased $2.6 million, or 18%, from the $14.1 million reported
for the same period in 2007. Increased losses and loss adjustment expenses
of
$7.3 million, partially offset by the increased revenue discussed above and
lower operating expenses of $1.7 million due mostly to production related
expenses.
The
Specialty Commercial Segment reported a net loss ratio of 60.8% for the first
six months of 2008 as compared to 53.4% for the first six months of 2007.
Unfavorable prior year development of $1.0 million for the six months ended
June
30, 2008 as compared to favorable prior year development of $1.4 million for
the
same period of 2007 was the primary cause for the increase in the net loss
ratio. Absent prior year development, the gross incurred losses and loss
adjustment expense before reinsurance were higher by $4.0 million primarily
due
to increased pricing pressure reflected in our current accident year loss
estimates.
The
Specialty Commercial Segment reported a net expense ratio of 30.7% for the
first
six months of 2008 as compared to 31.8% for the first six months of 2007. The
decrease in the net expense ratio was primarily due to increased retention
on
our catastrophe reinsurance and commercial property per risk reinsurance
programs during the first six months of 2008 as compared to the same period
in
2007.
Personal
Segment
Net
premium written for our Personal Segment increased $3.5 million during the
first
six months of 2008 to $31.9 million compared to $28.4 million in the first
six
months of 2007. The increase in premium was due mostly to continued geographic
expansion that began in 2007.
Total
revenue for the Personal Segment increased 13% to $32.2 million for the first
six months of 2008 from $28.5 million for the same period in 2007. Higher earned
premium of $3.5 million was the primary reason for the increase in revenue
for
the period. Increased finance charges of $0.3 million were partially offset
by
lower third party commission revenue of $0.1 million.
Pre-tax
income for the Personal Segment was $4.5 million for the six months ended June
30, 2008 as compared to $4.3 million for the same period in 2007. The increased
revenue, as discussed above, was offset by increased losses and loss adjustment
expenses of $2.5 million and increased operating expenses of $1.0 million due
mostly to production related expenses attributable to the increased earned
premium.
The
Personal Segment reported a net loss ratio of 66.0% for the first six months
of
2008 as compared to 65.3% for the same period in 2007. A competitive pricing
environment and the new business impact associated with geographic expansion
were the primary reasons for the increase in the net loss ratio. We recognized
$0.6 million of favorable prior accident year development during the first
six
months 2008 as compared to $0.1 million of favorable prior year development
during the first six months of 2007.
The
Personal Segment reported a net expense ratio of 22.0% for the first six months
of 2008 as compared to 23.2% for the first six months of 2007. The decrease
in
the net expense ratio was mainly due to increased finance charges in relation
to
earned premium, as well as fixed overhead allocations in relation to earned
premium.
28
Corporate
Corporate
revenue increased $1.2 million for the first six months of 2008 as compared
to
the same period in 2007. The increase was primarily due to increased investment
income of $1.0 million due primarily to changes in capital allocation and $1.1
million of net gains recognized on our investment portfolio during the first
six
months of 2008 as compared to $0.9 million of net gains recognized during the
same period of 2007.
Corporate
pre-tax loss was $3.2 million for the first six months of 2008 and 2007. The
increase in revenue discussed above was offset by increased interest expense
of
$0.8 million due primarily to the issuance of trust preferred securities in
August 2007 and increased operating expenses of $0.4 million.
Financial
Condition and Liquidity
Sources
and Uses of Funds
Our
sources of funds are from insurance-related operations, financing activities
and
investing activities. Major sources of funds from operations include premiums
collected (net of policy cancellations and premiums ceded), commissions, and
processing and service fees. As a holding company, Hallmark is dependent on
dividend payments and management fees from its subsidiaries to meet operating
expenses and debt obligations. As of June 30, 2008, Hallmark had $26.6 million
in unrestricted cash and invested assets at the holding company. Unrestricted
cash and invested assets of our non-insurance subsidiaries were $3.5 million
as
of June 30, 2008.
AHIC,
domiciled in Texas, is limited in the payment of dividends in any 12-month
period, without the prior written consent of the Texas Department of Insurance,
to the greater of statutory net income for the prior calendar year or 10% of
statutory surplus as of the prior year end. Dividends may only be paid from
unassigned surplus funds. HIC, domiciled in Arizona, is limited in the payment
of dividends to the lesser of 10% of prior year surplus or prior year’s net
investment income, without prior written approval from the Arizona Department
of
Insurance. HSIC, domiciled in Oklahoma, is limited in the payment of dividends
to the greater of 10% of prior year surplus or prior year’s statutory net
income, without prior written approval from the Oklahoma Insurance Department.
During 2008, our insurance company subsidiaries’ ordinary dividend capacity is
$16.3 million. None of our insurance company subsidiaries paid a dividend to
Hallmark during the first six months of 2008 or the 2007 fiscal
year.
Comparison
of June 30, 2008 to December 31, 2007
On
a
consolidated basis, our cash and investments (excluding restricted cash) at
June
30, 2008 were $370.9 million compared to $411.7 million at December 31, 2007.
Settlement of receivables and payables for securities during the first quarter
of 2008 as well as a decline in market value for the period, contributed to
this
decrease in our cash and investments. At June 30, 2008, 88% of the Company’s
investments were rated investment grade and had an average duration of 2.9
years, including approximately 36% that were held in short-term investments.
The
Company classifies its bond securities as available for sale. The net unrealized
loss associated with the investment portfolio was $4.7 million (net of tax
effects) at June 30, 2008 (see Note 4 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated
Financial Statements which appears in Item 1 of this Report).
29
Comparison
of Six Months Ended June 30, 2008 and June 30, 2007
Net
cash
provided by our consolidated operating activities was $29.7 million for the
first six months of 2008 compared to $44.6 million for the first six months
of
2007. The decrease in operating cash flow was primarily due to increased paid
losses from the maturing of retained business growth that began in late 2005.
Net
cash
used in investing activities during the first six months of 2008 was $132.0
million as compared to $68.6 million for the same period in 2007. Contributing
to the increase in cash used in investing activities was an increase of $111.4
million in purchases of debt and equity securities, a $80.0 million increase
in
net purchases of short-term investments, and a $8.3 million reduction in
restricted cash, partially offset by a $136.4 million increase in maturities
and
redemptions of investment securities.
Cash
used
in financing activities during the first six months of 2008 was $10.1 million
as
compared to $15.6 million used by financing activities for the same period
of
2007. The cash used in both periods was primarily for the payment of deferred
guaranteed consideration to the sellers of the subsidiaries comprising our
TGA
Operating Unit. As of June 30, 2008 we had fully repaid our obligation to the
sellers.
Credit
Facilities
On
June
29, 2005, we entered into a credit facility with The Frost National Bank. The
credit facility was amended and restated on January 27, 2006 to a $20.0 million
revolving credit facility, with a $5.0 million letter of credit sub-facility.
The credit facility was further amended effective May 31, 2007 to increase
the
revolving credit facility to $25.0 million and establish a new $5.0 million
revolving credit sub-facility for the premium finance operations of PAAC. The
credit agreement was again amended effective February 20, 2008 to extend the
termination to January 27, 2010, revise various affirmative and negative
covenants and decrease the interest rate in most instances to the three month
Eurodollar rate plus 1.90 percentage points, payable quarterly in arrears.
We
pay letter of credit fees at the rate of 1.00% per annum. Our obligations under
the revolving credit facility are secured by a security interest in the capital
stock of all of our subsidiaries, guaranties of all of our subsidiaries and
the
pledge of substantially all of our assets. The revolving credit facility
contains covenants which, among other things, require us to maintain certain
financial and operating ratios and restrict certain distributions, transactions
and organizational changes. As of June 30, 2008, we were in compliance with
all
of our covenants. As of June 30, 2008, we had $3.9 million outstanding under
this credit facility.
Trust
Preferred Securities
On
June
21, 2005, an unconsolidated trust subsidiary completed a private placement
of
$30.0 million of 30-year floating rate trust preferred securities.
Simultaneously, we borrowed $30.9 million from the trust subsidiary and
contributed $30.0 million to one of our insurance company subsidiaries in order
to increase policyholder surplus. The note bears an initial interest rate of
7.725% until June 15, 2015, at which time interest will adjust quarterly to
the
three-month LIBOR rate plus 3.25 percentage points. As of June 30, 2008, the
note balance was $30.9 million. Under the terms of the note, we pay interest
only each quarter and the principal of the note at maturity.
On
August
23, 2007, an unconsolidated trust subsidiary completed a private placement
of
$25.0 million of 30-year floating rate trust preferred securities.
Simultaneously, we borrowed $25.8 million from the trust subsidiary for working
capital and general corporate purposes. The note bears an initial interest
rate
at 8.28% until September 15, 2017, at which time interest will adjust quarterly
to the three-month LIBOR rate plus 2.90 percentage points. As of June 30, 2008,
the note balance was $25.8 million. Under the terms of the note, we pay interest
only each quarter and the principal of the note at maturity.
30
Structured
Settlements
In
connection with our acquisition of the subsidiaries now comprising our TGA
Operating Unit, we issued to the sellers promissory notes in the aggregate
principal amount of $23.7 million, of which $14.2 million was paid on January
2,
2007, and $9.5 million was paid on January 2, 2008. We were also obligated
to
pay to the sellers an additional $1.3 million, of which $0.8 million was paid
on
January 2, 2007 and an additional $0.5 million was paid on January 2, 2008,
in
consideration of the sellers’ compliance with certain restrictive covenants,
including a covenant not to compete for a period of five years after closing.
We
secured payment of these installments of purchase price and restrictive covenant
consideration by depositing $25.0 million in a trust account for the benefit
of
the sellers. We recorded a payable for future guaranteed payments to the sellers
of $25.0 million discounted at 4.4%, the rate of two-year U.S. Treasuries (the
only permitted investment of the trust account). As of June 30, 2008 we had
fully repaid our obligation to the sellers.
Conclusion
Based
on
budgeted and year-to-date cash flow information, we believe that we have
sufficient liquidity to meet our projected insurance obligations, operational
expenses and capital expenditure requirements for the next 12 months.
Item
3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market
Risk.
As
of
June 30, 2008, there had been no material changes in the market risks described
in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2007.
Item
4T. Controls and Procedures.
The
principal executive officer and principal financial officer of Hallmark have
evaluated our disclosure controls and procedures and have concluded that, as
of
the end of the period covered by this report, such disclosure controls and
procedures were effective in ensuring that information required to be disclosed
by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act
of
1934 is timely recorded, processed, summarized and reported. The principal
executive officer and principal financial officer also concluded that such
disclosure controls and procedures were effective in ensuring that information
required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under
such
Act is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal
executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate, to allow
timely decisions regarding required disclosure. During the most recent fiscal
quarter, there have been no changes in our internal controls over financial
reporting that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially
affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
31
Risks
Associated with Forward-Looking Statements Included in this Form
10-Q
This
Form
10-Q contains certain forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section
27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange
Act
of 1934, which are intended to be covered by the safe harbors created thereby.
These statements include the plans and objectives of management for future
operations, including plans and objectives relating to future growth of our
business activities and availability of funds. The forward-looking statements
included herein are based on current expectations that involve numerous risks
and uncertainties. Assumptions relating to the foregoing involve judgments
with
respect to, among other things, future economic, competitive and market
conditions, regulatory framework, weather-related events and future business
decisions, all of which are difficult or impossible to predict accurately and
many of which are beyond our control. Although we believe that the assumptions
underlying the forward-looking statements are reasonable, any of the assumptions
could be inaccurate and, therefore, there can be no assurance that the
forward-looking statements included in this Form 10-Q will prove to be accurate.
In light of the significant uncertainties inherent in the forward-looking
statements included herein, the inclusion of such information should not be
regarded as a representation by us or any other person that our objectives
and
plans will be achieved.
32
PART
II
OTHER
INFORMATION
Item
1. Legal
Proceedings.
We
are
engaged in legal proceedings in the ordinary course of business, none of which,
either individually or in the aggregate, are believed likely to have a material
adverse effect on our consolidated financial position or results of operations,
in the opinion of management. The various legal proceedings to which we are
a
party are routine in nature and incidental to our business.
Item
1A. Risk
Factors.
This
Item
is omitted, as permitted for a “smaller reporting company” (as defined by the
Securities and Exchange Commission).
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.
None.
Item
3. Defaults
Upon Senior Securities.
None.
Item
4. Submission
of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.
Hallmark’s
Annual Meeting of Shareholders was held on May 22, 2008. Of the 20,801,587
shares of common stock of Hallmark entitled to vote at the meeting, 16,666,751
shares were present in person or by proxy.
At
the
Annual Meeting, the following individuals were elected to serve as directors
of
Hallmark and received the number of votes set forth opposite their respective
names:
Director
|
Votes For
|
|
Votes Withheld
|
||||
Mark
E. Schwarz
|
15,212,726
|
281,287
|
|||||
Scott
T. Berlin
|
16,258,362
|
281,287
|
|||||
James
H. Graves
|
16,385,389
|
281,287
|
|||||
George
R. Manser
|
16,169,427
|
281,287
|
At
the
Annual Meeting, Hallmark stockholders approved an increase in the number of
shares of common stock authorized for issuance under the 2005 Long Term
Incentive Plan. Votes were cast 14,443,821 in favor of such proposal, with
11,865 votes abstaining.
Item
5. Other
Information.
None.
33
Item
6. Exhibits.
The
following exhibits are filed herewith or incorporated herein by
reference:
Exhibit
Number
|
Description
|
|
3(a)
|
Restated
Articles of Incorporation of the registrant, as amended (incorporated
by
reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the registrant’s Registration Statement on
Form S-1 [Registration No. 333-136414] filed September 8,
2006).
|
|
3(b)
|
Amended
and Restated By-Laws of the registrant (incorporated by reference
to
Exhibit 3.1 to the registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed October
1, 2007).
|
|
4(a)
|
Specimen
certificate for Common Stock, $0.18 par value per share, of the registrant
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Amendment No. 1 to the
registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 [Registration No.
333-136414] filed September 8, 2006).
|
|
4(b)
|
Indenture
dated as of June 21, 2005, between Hallmark Financial Services, Inc.
and
JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association (incorporated by reference
to
Exhibit 4.1 to the registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed June 27,
2005).
|
|
4(c)
|
Amended
and Restated Declaration of Trust of Hallmark Statutory Trust I dated
as
of June 21, 2005, among Hallmark Financial Services, Inc., as sponsor,
Chase Bank USA, National Association, as Delaware trustee, and JPMorgan
Chase Bank, National Association, as institutional trustee, and Mark
Schwarz and Mark Morrison, as administrators (incorporated by reference
to
Exhibit 4.2 to the registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed June 27,
2005).
|
|
4(d)
|
Form
of Junior Subordinated Debt Security Due 2035 (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 4.1 to the registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed June
27, 2005).
|
|
4(e)
|
Form
of Capital Security Certificate (incorporated by reference to Exhibit
4.2
to the registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed June 27,
2005).
|
|
4(f)
|
First
Restated Credit Agreement dated January 27, 2006, between Hallmark
Financial Services, Inc. and The Frost National Bank (incorporated
by
reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K
filed February 2, 2006).
|
|
4(g)
|
Form
of Registration Rights Agreement dated January 27, 2006, between
Hallmark
Financial Services, Inc. and Newcastle Special Opportunity Fund I,
L.P.
and Newcastle Special Opportunity Fund II, L.P. (incorporated by
reference
to Exhibit 4.1 to the registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed
February 2, 2006).
|
|
4(h)
|
Indenture
dated as of August 23, 2007, between Hallmark Financial Services,
Inc. and
The Bank of New York Trust Company, National Association (incorporated
by
reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K
filed August 24, 2007).
|
|
4(i)
|
Amended
and Restated Declaration of Trust of Hallmark Statutory Trust II
dated as
of August 23, 2007, among Hallmark Financial Services, Inc., as sponsor,
The Bank of New York (Delaware), as Delaware trustee, and The Bank
of New
York Trust Company, National Association, as institutional trustee,
and
Mark Schwarz and Mark Morrison, as administrators (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K
filed August 24, 2007).
|
34
Exhibit
Number
|
Description
|
|
4(j)
|
Form
of Junior Subordinated Debt Security Due 2037 (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 4.1 to the registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed August
24, 2007).
|
|
4(k)
|
Form
of Capital Security Certificate (incorporated by reference to Exhibit
4.2
to the registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed August 24,
2007).
|
|
31(a)
|
Certification
of principal executive officer required by Rule 13a-14(a) or
Rule
15d-14(a).
|
|
31(b)
|
Certification
of principal financial officer required by Rule 13a-14(a) or
Rule
15d-14(a).
|
|
32(a)
|
Certification
of principal executive officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
1350.
|
|
32(b)
|
Certification
of principal financial officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
1350.
|
35
SIGNATURES
In
accordance with the requirements of the Exchange Act, the registrant has caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly
authorized.
HALLMARK
FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
(Registrant)
Date:
August 11, 2008
|
/s/ Mark J. Morrison | |
|
Mark
J. Morrison, Chief Executive Officer and President
(Principal
Executive Officer)
|
|
Date:
August 11, 2008
|
/s/ Jeffrey R. Passmore | |
|
Jeffrey
R. Passmore, Chief Accounting Officer and Senior Vice
President
|
|
(Principal
Financial Officer)
|
36