Harvest Oil & Gas Corp. - Quarter Report: 2008 June (Form 10-Q)
UNITED
STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington,
D.C. 20549
Form 10-Q
þ QUARTERLY
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934
For
the quarterly period ended June 30, 2008
OR
o TRANSITION
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934
Commission
File Number
001-33024
EV
Energy Partners, L.P.
(Exact
name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware
(State
or other jurisdiction
of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
20-4745690
(I.R.S.
Employer Identification No.)
|
|
|
|
1001
Fannin, Suite 800, Houston, Texas
(Address
of principal executive offices)
|
|
77002
(Zip
Code)
|
Registrant’s
telephone number, including area code: (713) 651-1144
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to
be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to
such
filing requirements for the past 90 days.
YES
þ
NO
o
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.
See
definition of “accelerated filer,” “large accelerated filer” and “smaller
reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. Check one:
Large
accelerated filer o
|
|
Accelerated
filer þ
|
|
Non-accelerated
filer o
|
Smaller
reporting company o
|
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in
Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
YES
o
NO
þ
As
of
August 8, 2008, the registrant had 11,881,939 common units outstanding.
Table
of Contents
PART
I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
||
Item
1. Financial Statements (unaudited)
|
2
|
|
Item
2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results
of Operations
|
13
|
|
Item
3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market
Risk
|
20
|
|
Item
4. Controls and Procedures
|
21
|
|
PART
II. OTHER INFORMATION
|
||
Item
1. Legal Proceedings
|
22
|
|
Item
1A. Risk Factors
|
22
|
|
Item
2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of
Proceeds
|
22
|
|
Item
3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
|
22
|
|
Item
4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
|
22
|
|
Item
5. Other Information
|
22
|
|
Item
6. Exhibits
|
22
|
|
|
||
Signatures
|
23
|
1
PART
1. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM
1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
EV
Energy Partners, L.P.
Condensed
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(In
thousands, except number of units)
(Unaudited)
June 30,
|
December 31,
|
||||||
2008
|
2007
|
||||||
ASSETS
|
|||||||
Current
assets:
|
|||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
$
|
14,507
|
$
|
10,220
|
|||
Accounts
receivable:
|
|||||||
Oil,
natural gas and natural gas liquids revenues
|
27,806
|
18,658
|
|||||
Related
party
|
13,611
|
3,656
|
|||||
Other
|
12
|
15
|
|||||
Derivative
asset
|
-
|
1,762
|
|||||
Prepaid
expenses and other current assets
|
294
|
594
|
|||||
Total
current assets
|
56,230
|
34,905
|
|||||
Oil
and natural gas properties, net of accumulated depreciation, depletion
and
amortization;
June
30, 2008, $47,056; December 31, 2007, $30,724
|
586,546
|
570,398
|
|||||
Other
property, net of accumulated depreciation and amortization;
June
30, 2008, $262; December 31, 2007, $239
|
201
|
225
|
|||||
Other
assets
|
1,999
|
2,013
|
|||||
Total
assets
|
$
|
644,976
|
$
|
607,541
|
|||
LIABILITIES
AND OWNERS’ EQUITY
|
|||||||
Current
liabilities:
|
|||||||
Accounts
payable and accrued liabilities
|
$
|
15,678
|
$
|
12,113
|
|||
Deferred
revenues
|
2,517
|
1,122
|
|||||
Derivative
liability
|
77,821
|
5,232
|
|||||
Total
current liabilities
|
96,016
|
18,467
|
|||||
Asset
retirement obligations
|
21,078
|
19,463
|
|||||
Long-term
debt
|
287,000
|
270,000
|
|||||
Share-based
compensation liability
|
1,506
|
1,507
|
|||||
Long-term
derivative liability
|
99,811
|
15,074
|
|||||
Commitments
and contingencies
|
|||||||
Owners’
equity:
|
|||||||
Common
unitholders – 11,881,939 units and 11,839,439 units issued
and outstanding
as of June 30, 2008 and
December
31, 2007, respectively
|
172,943
|
282,676
|
|||||
Subordinated
unitholders – 3,100,000 units issued and outstanding as of June
30, 2008 and December 31, 2007
|
(34,482
|
)
|
(5,488
|
)
|
|||
General
partner interest
|
169
|
4,245
|
|||||
Accumulated
other comprehensive income
|
935
|
1,597
|
|||||
Total
owners’ equity
|
139,565
|
283,030
|
|||||
Total
liabilities and owners’ equity
|
$
|
644,976
|
$
|
607,541
|
See
accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
2
EV
Energy Partners, L.P.
Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Operations
(In
thousands, except per unit data)
(Unaudited)
Three Months Ended June 30,
|
Six Months Ended June 30,
|
||||||||||||
2008
|
2007
|
2008
|
2007
|
||||||||||
Revenues:
|
|||||||||||||
Oil,
natural gas and natural gas liquids revenues
|
$
|
57,136
|
$
|
17,791
|
$
|
101,664
|
$
|
27,831
|
|||||
Gain
on derivatives, net
|
604
|
947
|
662
|
1,694
|
|||||||||
Transportation
and marketing-related revenues
|
3,309
|
4,400
|
6,480
|
5,620
|
|||||||||
Total
revenues
|
61,049
|
23,138
|
108,806
|
35,145
|
|||||||||
Operating
costs and expenses:
|
|||||||||||||
Lease
operating expenses
|
9,552
|
4,215
|
18,714
|
6,521
|
|||||||||
Cost
of purchased natural gas
|
2,803
|
3,777
|
5,415
|
4,886
|
|||||||||
Production
taxes
|
2,606
|
479
|
4,628
|
852
|
|||||||||
Asset
retirement obligations accretion expense
|
308
|
123
|
606
|
214
|
|||||||||
Depreciation,
depletion and amortization
|
7,811
|
3,504
|
16,355
|
5,536
|
|||||||||
General
and administrative expenses
|
3,571
|
2,129
|
7,024
|
3,731
|
|||||||||
Total
operating costs and expenses
|
26,651
|
14,227
|
52,742
|
21,740
|
|||||||||
Operating
income
|
34,398
|
8,911
|
56,064
|
13,405
|
|||||||||
Other
(expense) income, net:
|
|||||||||||||
Interest
expense
|
(3,069
|
)
|
(1,380
|
)
|
(6,827
|
)
|
(2,323
|
)
|
|||||
(Loss)
gain on mark-to-market derivatives, net
|
(130,889
|
)
|
4,245
|
(173,465
|
)
|
(2,000
|
)
|
||||||
Other
income, net
|
94
|
181
|
162
|
273
|
|||||||||
Total
other (expense) income, net
|
(133,864
|
)
|
3,046
|
(180,130
|
)
|
(4,050
|
)
|
||||||
(Loss)
income before income taxes
|
(99,466
|
)
|
11,957
|
(124,066
|
)
|
9,355
|
|||||||
Income
taxes
|
(58
|
)
|
-
|
(130
|
)
|
-
|
|||||||
Net
(loss) income
|
$
|
(99,524
|
)
|
$
|
11,957
|
$
|
(124,196
|
)
|
$
|
9,355
|
|||
General
partner’s interest in net (loss) income
|
$
|
(1,991
|
)
|
$
|
239
|
$
|
(2,484
|
)
|
$
|
187
|
|||
Limited
partners’ interest in net (loss) income
|
$
|
(97,533
|
)
|
$
|
11,718
|
$
|
(121,712
|
)
|
$
|
9,168
|
|||
Net
(loss) income per limited partner unit:
|
|||||||||||||
Common
units (basic and diluted)
|
$
|
(6.51
|
)
|
$
|
0.93
|
$
|
(8.13
|
)
|
$
|
0.84
|
|||
Subordinated
units (basic and diluted)
|
$
|
(6.51
|
)
|
$
|
0.93
|
$
|
(8.13
|
)
|
$
|
0.84
|
|||
Weighted
average limited partner units outstanding:
|
|||||||||||||
Common
units (basic and diluted)
|
11,882
|
9,554
|
11,879
|
7,756
|
|||||||||
Subordinated
units (basic and diluted)
|
3,100
|
3,100
|
3,100
|
3,100
|
See
accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
EV
Energy Partners, L.P.
Condensed
Statements of Cash Flows
(In
thousands)
(Unaudited)
Six Months Ended June 30,
|
|||||||
2008
|
2007
|
||||||
Cash
flows from operating activities:
|
|||||||
Net
(loss) income
|
$
|
(124,196
|
)
|
$
|
9,355
|
||
Adjustments
to reconcile net (loss) income to net cash flows provided
by operating
activities:
|
|||||||
Asset
retirement obligations accretion expense
|
606
|
214
|
|||||
Depreciation,
depletion and amortization
|
16,355
|
5,536
|
|||||
Share-based
compensation cost
|
1,261
|
498
|
|||||
Amortization
of deferred loan costs
|
144
|
57
|
|||||
Unrealized
loss on derivatives, net
|
158,425
|
4,304
|
|||||
Changes
in operating assets and liabilities:
|
|||||||
Accounts
receivable
|
(19,099
|
)
|
353
|
||||
Prepaid
expenses and other current assets
|
300
|
462
|
|||||
Other
assets
|
(5
|
)
|
(285
|
)
|
|||
Accounts
payable and accrued liabilities
|
3,183
|
575
|
|||||
Deferred
revenues
|
1,395
|
-
|
|||||
Net
cash flows provided by operating activities
|
38,369
|
21,069
|
|||||
Cash
flows from investing activities:
|
|||||||
Acquisitions
of oil and natural gas properties
|
(17,491
|
)
|
(258,935
|
)
|
|||
Development
of oil and natural gas properties
|
(13,597
|
)
|
(3,111
|
)
|
|||
Net
cash flows used in investing activities
|
(31,088
|
)
|
(262,046
|
)
|
|||
Cash
flows from financing activities:
|
|||||||
Debt
borrowings
|
17,000
|
243,350
|
|||||
Repayment
of debt borrowings
|
-
|
(196,350
|
)
|
||||
Deferred
loan costs
|
(125
|
)
|
(153
|
)
|
|||
Proceeds
from private equity offerings
|
-
|
220,000
|
|||||
Offering
costs
|
-
|
(131
|
)
|
||||
Distributions
to partners and dividends paid
|
(19,869
|
)
|
(8,512
|
)
|
|||
Distributions
related to acquisitions
|
-
|
(5,801
|
)
|
||||
Net
cash flows (used in) provided by financing activities
|
(2,994
|
)
|
252,403
|
||||
Increase
in cash and cash equivalents
|
4,287
|
11,426
|
|||||
Cash
and cash equivalents – beginning of period
|
10,220
|
1,875
|
|||||
Cash
and cash equivalents – end of period
|
$
|
14,507
|
$
|
13,301
|
See
accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
EV
Energy Partners, L.P.
Notes
to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
NOTE
1. ORGANIZATION AND NATURE OF BUSINESS
Nature
of Operations
EV
Energy
Partners, L.P. (“we,” “our” or “us”) is a publicly held limited partnership that
engages in the acquisition, development and production of oil and natural gas
properties. Our general partner is EV Energy GP, L.P. (“EV Energy GP”), a
Delaware limited partnership, and the general partner of our general partner
is
EV Management, LLC (“EV Management”), a Delaware limited liability company.
Basis
of Presentation
Our
unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements included herein have
been
prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange
Commission. Accordingly, certain information and disclosures normally included
in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America have been condensed or
omitted. We believe that the presentations and disclosures herein are adequate
to make the information not misleading. The unaudited condensed consolidated
financial statements reflect all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring
adjustments) necessary for a fair presentation of the interim periods. The
results of operations for the interim periods are not necessarily indicative
of
the results of operations to be expected for the full year. These interim
financial statements should be read in conjunction with our Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007.
All
intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
In
the Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, all dollar
and share amounts in tabulations are in thousands of dollars and shares,
respectively, unless otherwise indicated.
NOTE
2. SHARE–BASED COMPENSATION
We
account for our share-based compensation in accordance with Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 123 - Revised 2004,
Share-Based
Payment (“SFAS
123(R)”). As of June 30, 2008, we had 0.3 million phantom units outstanding,
which are subject to graded vesting over a two or three year period. On
satisfaction of the vesting requirement, the holders of the phantom units are
entitled, at our discretion, to either common units or a cash payment equal
to
the current value of the units. We account for these phantom units as liability
awards, and the fair value of the phantom units is remeasured at the end of
each
reporting period based on the current market price of our common units until
settlement. Prior to settlement, compensation cost is recognized for the phantom
units based on the proportionate amount of the requisite service period that
has
been rendered to date.
We
recognized compensation cost related to our phantom units of $0.8 million and
$0.3 million in the three months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively,
and
$1.3 million and $0.5 million in the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007,
respectively. These costs are included in “General and administrative expenses”
in our condensed consolidated statement of operations.
In
January 2008, 42,500 phantom units vested and were converted to common units
at
a fair value of $1.3 million.
As
of
June 30, 2008, there was $4.4 million of total unrecognized compensation
cost related to nonvested phantom units which is expected to be recognized
over
a weighted average period of 2.1 years.
5
EV
Energy Partners, L.P.
Notes
to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
NOTE
3. ACQUISITIONS
In
May
2008, we acquired oil properties in South Central Texas for $17.5 million.
The
acquisition was primarily funded with borrowings under our credit facility.
In
2007,
we completed the following acquisitions:
·
|
in
January, we acquired natural gas properties in Michigan from an
institutional partnership managed by EnerVest for $69.5 million,
net of
cash acquired;
|
·
|
in
March, we acquired additional natural gas properties in the Monroe
Field
in Louisiana from an institutional partnership managed by EnerVest
for
$95.4 million;
|
·
|
in
June, we acquired oil and natural gas properties in Central and East
Texas
from Anadarko Petroleum Corporation for $93.6
million;
|
·
|
in
October, we acquired oil and natural gas properties in the Permian
Basin
from Plantation Operating, LLC, a company sponsored by investment
funds
formed by EnCap Investments, L.P. for $154.7 million;
and
|
·
|
in
December, we acquired oil and natural gas properties in the Appalachian
Basin from an institutional partnership managed by EnerVest for $59.6
million.
|
The
following table reflects pro forma revenues, net income and net income per
limited partner unit as if the acquisitions completed in 2007 had taken place
at
the beginning of the period presented. These unaudited pro forma amounts do
not
purport to be indicative of the results that would have actually been obtained
during the periods presented or that may be obtained in the future.
Three
Months
Ended
June 30,
|
Six
Months
Ended
June 30,
|
||||||
2007
|
2007
|
||||||
Revenues
|
$
|
46,456
|
$
|
87,156
|
|||
Net
income
|
19,986
|
25,375
|
|||||
Net
income per limited partner unit:
|
|||||||
Basic
|
$
|
1.55
|
$
|
2.29
|
|||
Diluted
|
$
|
1.55
|
$
|
2.29
|
6
EV
Energy Partners, L.P.
Notes
to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
NOTE
4. RISK MANAGEMENT
Our
business activities expose us to risks associated with changes in the market
price of oil and natural gas and as such, future earnings are subject to change
due to changes in these market prices. We use derivative instruments to reduce
our risk of changes in the prices of oil and natural gas. As of June 30, 2008,
we had entered into oil and natural gas derivative instruments with the
following terms:
Period
Covered
|
Index
|
Hedged
Volume
per Day
|
Weighted
Average
Fixed
Price
|
Weighted
Average
Floor
Price
|
Weighted
Average
Ceiling
Price
|
|||||||||||
Oil
(Bbls):
|
||||||||||||||||
Swaps
– 2008
|
WTI
|
1,354
|
$
|
76.27
|
$
|
$
|
||||||||||
Collar
– 2008
|
WTI
|
125
|
62.00
|
73.95
|
||||||||||||
Swaps
– 2009
|
WTI
|
1,131
|
75.86
|
|||||||||||||
Collar
– 2009
|
WTI
|
125
|
62.00
|
73.90
|
||||||||||||
Swaps
– 2010
|
WTI
|
1,150
|
74.91
|
|||||||||||||
Swap
– 2011
|
WTI
|
150
|
98.55
|
|||||||||||||
Collar
– 2011
|
WTI
|
1,100
|
110.00
|
166.45
|
||||||||||||
Swap
– 2012
|
WTI
|
150
|
98.25
|
|||||||||||||
Collar
– 2012
|
WTI
|
1,000
|
110.00
|
170.85
|
||||||||||||
Natural
Gas (MMBtu):
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Swaps
– 2008
|
Dominion
Appalachia
|
6,500
|
9.07
|
|||||||||||||
Swaps
– 2009
|
Dominion
Appalachia
|
4,400
|
8.79
|
|||||||||||||
Swaps
– 2010
|
Dominion
Appalachia
|
5,600
|
8.65
|
|||||||||||||
Swap
– 2011
|
Dominion
Appalachia
|
2,500
|
8.69
|
|||||||||||||
Collar
– 2011
|
Dominion
Appalachia
|
3,000
|
9.00
|
12.15
|
||||||||||||
Collar
– 2012
|
Dominion
Appalachia
|
5,000
|
8.95
|
11.45
|
||||||||||||
Swaps
– 2008
|
NYMEX
|
4,000
|
8.85
|
|||||||||||||
Collars
– 2008
|
NYMEX
|
6,000
|
7.67
|
10.25
|
||||||||||||
Swaps
– 2009
|
NYMEX
|
4,500
|
8.00
|
|||||||||||||
Collars
– 2009
|
NYMEX
|
7,000
|
7.79
|
9.50
|
||||||||||||
Swaps
– 2010
|
NYMEX
|
7,500
|
8.44
|
|||||||||||||
Collar
– 2010
|
NYMEX
|
1,500
|
7.50
|
10.00
|
||||||||||||
Swaps
– 2011
|
NYMEX
|
8,000
|
8.96
|
|||||||||||||
Swaps
– 2012
|
NYMEX
|
8,000
|
9.77
|
|||||||||||||
Swaps
– 2008
|
MICHCON_NB
|
3,500
|
8.16
|
|||||||||||||
Collar
-2008
|
MICHCON_NB
|
|
2,000
|
8.00
|
9.55
|
|||||||||||
Swaps
– 2009
|
MICHCON_NB
|
5,000
|
8.27
|
|||||||||||||
Swap
– 2010
|
MICHCON_NB
|
5,000
|
8.34
|
|||||||||||||
Collar
– 2011
|
MICHCON_NB
|
4,500
|
8.70
|
11.85
|
||||||||||||
Collar
– 2012
|
MICHCON_NB
|
4,500
|
8.75
|
11.05
|
||||||||||||
Swaps
– 2008
|
HOUSTON
SC
|
5,206
|
8.16
|
|||||||||||||
Swaps
– 2009
|
HOUSTON
SC
|
4,320
|
8.29
|
|||||||||||||
Collar
– 2010
|
HOUSTON
SC
|
3,500
|
7.25
|
9.55
|
||||||||||||
Collar
– 2011
|
HOUSTON
SC
|
3,500
|
8.25
|
11.65
|
||||||||||||
Collar
– 2012
|
HOUSTON
SC
|
3,000
|
8.25
|
11.10
|
||||||||||||
Swap
– 2008
|
EL
PASO PERMIAN
|
3,000
|
7.23
|
|||||||||||||
Swap
– 2009
|
EL
PASO PERMIAN
|
2,500
|
7.93
|
|||||||||||||
Swap
– 2010
|
EL
PASO PERMIAN
|
2,500
|
7.68
|
|||||||||||||
Swap
– 2011
|
EL
PASO PERMIAN
|
2,500
|
9.30
|
|||||||||||||
Swap
– 2012
|
EL
PASO PERMIAN
|
2,000
|
9.21
|
7
EV
Energy Partners, L.P.
Notes
to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
In
addition, our floating rate credit facility exposes us to risks associated
with
changes in interest rates and as such, future earnings are subject to change
due
to changes in these interest rates. In June 2008, we entered into four interest
rate swaps to reduce our risk of changes in interest rates. As of June 30,
2008,
we had entered into interest rate swaps with the following terms:
Period
Covered
|
Notional
Amount
|
Fixed
Rate
|
|||||
July
2008 – July 2012
|
$
|
20,000
|
4.248
|
%
|
|||
July
2008 – July 2012
|
35,000
|
4.220
|
%
|
||||
July
2008 – July 2012
|
35,000
|
4.250
|
%
|
||||
July
2008 – July 2012
|
35,000
|
4.220
|
%
|
At
June
30, 2008, the fair value associated with these oil and natural gas derivative
instruments and interest rate swaps was a net liability of $177.6 million.
As
of
June 30, 2008, we had accumulated other comprehensive income (“AOCI”) of $0.9
million related to derivative instruments where we removed the hedge
designation. We reclassified $0.6 million and $1.0 million during the three
months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively, and $0.7 million and $1.7
million during the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively, from
AOCI to “Gain on derivatives, net.” We anticipate that $0.9 million will be
reclassified from AOCI during the next six months.
We
recorded unrealized (losses) gains on the change in fair value of our derivative
instruments in “(Loss) gain on mark-to-market derivatives, net” of $(118.7)
million and $2.4 million during the three months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007,
respectively, and $(159.1) million and $(6.0) million during the six months
ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. In addition, we recorded net
realized (losses) gains related to settlements of our derivative instruments
in
“(Loss) gain on mark-to-market derivatives, net.” of $(12.2) million and $1.8
million during the three months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively,
and
$(14.4) million and $4.0 million during the six months ended June 30, 2008
and
2007, respectively.
NOTE
5. ASSET RETIREMENT OBLIGATIONS
If
a
reasonable estimate of the fair value of an obligation to perform site
reclamation, dismantle facilities or plug and abandon wells can be made, we
record an asset retirement obligation (“ARO”) and capitalize the asset
retirement cost in oil and natural gas properties in the period in which the
retirement obligation is incurred. After recording these amounts, the ARO is
accreted to its future estimated value using an assumed cost of funds and the
additional capitalized costs are depreciated on a unit-of-production basis.
The
changes in the aggregate ARO are as follows:
Balance
as of December 31, 2007
|
$
|
19,595
|
||
Accretion
expense
|
606
|
|||
Liabilities
assumed in acquisition
|
1,037
|
|||
Revisions
in estimated cash flows
|
(28
|
)
|
||
Balance
as of June 30, 2008
|
$
|
21,210
|
As
of
both June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, $0.1 million of our ARO is classified
as current and is included in “Accounts payable and accrued liabilities” on our
condensed consolidated balance sheet.
NOTE
6. LONG-TERM DEBT
As
of
June 30, 2008, our credit facility consists of a $500.0 million senior secured
revolving credit facility that expires in October 2012. Borrowings under the
facility are secured by a first priority lien on substantially all of our assets
and the assets of our subsidiaries. We may use borrowings under the facility
for
acquiring and developing oil and natural gas properties, for working capital
purposes, for general corporate purposes and for funding distributions to
partners. We also may use up to $50.0 million of available borrowing capacity
for letters of credit. The facility contains certain covenants which, among
other things, require the maintenance of a current ratio (as defined in the
facility) of greater than 1.00 and a ratio of total debt to earnings plus
interest expense, taxes, depreciation, depletion and amortization expense and
exploration expense of no greater than 4.0 to 1.0. As of June 30, 2008, we
were
in compliance with all of the facility covenants.
8
EV
Energy Partners, L.P.
Notes
to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
Borrowings
under the facility bear interest at a floating rate based on, at our election,
a
base rate or the London Inter-Bank Offered Rate plus applicable premiums based
on the percent of the borrowing base that we have outstanding (weighted average
effective interest rate of 4.99% at June 30, 2008).
Borrowings
under the facility may not exceed a “borrowing base” determined by the lenders
based on our oil and natural gas reserves. As of June 30, 2008, the borrowing
base was $325.0 million. The borrowing base is subject to scheduled
redeterminations on a semi-annual basis with an additional redetermination
once
per calendar year at our request or at the request of the lenders and with
one
calculation that may be made at our request during each calendar year in
connection with material acquisitions or divestitures of
properties.
At
June
30, 2008, we had $287.0 million outstanding under the facility.
NOTE
7. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
We
are
involved in disputes or legal actions arising in the ordinary course of
business. We do not believe the outcome of such disputes or legal actions will
have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial
statements.
NOTE
8. OWNERS’ EQUITY
On
January 29, 2008, the board of directors of EV Management declared a $0.60
per
unit distribution for the fourth quarter of 2007 on all common and subordinated
units. The distribution of $9.7 million was paid on February 14, 2008 to
unitholders of record at the close of business on February 8, 2008.
On
April 25, 2008, the board of directors of EV Management declared a $0.62 per
unit distribution for the first quarter of 2008 on all common and subordinated
units. The distribution of $10.1 million was paid on May 15, 2008 to unitholders
of record at the close of business on May 8, 2008.
On
July
24, 2008, the board of directors of EV Management declared a $0.70 per unit
distribution for the second quarter of 2008 on all common and subordinated
units. The distribution of $11.7 million is to be paid on August 14, 2008 to
unitholders of record at the close of business on August 5, 2007.
NOTE
9. COMPREHENSIVE (LOSS) INCOME
Comprehensive
(loss) income includes all changes in equity during a period except those
resulting from investments by and distributions to owners. The components of
our
comprehensive (loss) income, net of related tax, are as follows:
|
Three Months Ended June 30,
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|||||||||
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
||||
Net (loss) income
|
$
|
(99,524
|
)
|
$
|
11,957
|
$
|
(124,196
|
)
|
$
|
9,355
|
|||
Other
comprehensive loss:
|
|||||||||||||
Reclassification
adjustment into earnings
|
(604
|
)
|
(947
|
)
|
(662
|
)
|
(1,694
|
)
|
|||||
Comprehensive
(loss) income
|
$
|
(100,128
|
)
|
$
|
11,010
|
$
|
(124,858
|
)
|
$
|
7,661
|
9
EV
Energy Partners, L.P.
Notes
to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
NOTE
10. NET (LOSS) INCOME PER LIMITED PARTNER UNIT
We
calculate net (loss) income per limited partner unit in accordance with Emerging
Issues Task Force 03-06, Participating
Securities and the Two-Class Method under FASB Statement
No. 128
(“EITF
03-06”). The computation of net (loss) income per limited partner unit is based
on the weighted average number of common and subordinated units outstanding
during the period. Basic and diluted net (loss) income per limited partner
unit
is determined by dividing net (loss) income, after deducting the amount
allocated to the general partner interest, by the weighted average number of
outstanding limited partner units during the period.
The
following sets forth the net (loss) income allocation in accordance with EITF
03-06:
|
Three Months Ended June 30,
|
Six Months Ended June 30,
|
|||||||||||
|
2008
|
2007
|
2008
|
2007
|
|||||||||
Net
(loss) income
|
$
|
(99,524
|
)
|
$
|
11,957
|
$
|
(124,196
|
)
|
$
|
9,355
|
|||
Less
general partner’s 2% interest in net
(loss) income
|
1,991
|
(239
|
)
|
2,484
|
(187
|
)
|
|||||||
Net
(loss) income available for limited partners
|
$
|
(97,533
|
)
|
$
|
11,718
|
$
|
(121,712
|
)
|
$
|
9,168
|
|||
Weighted
average common units outstanding
(basic and diluted)
|
|||||||||||||
Common
units (basic and diluted)
|
11,882
|
9,554
|
11,879
|
7,756
|
|||||||||
Subordinated
units (basic and diluted)
|
3,100
|
3,100
|
3,100
|
3,100
|
|||||||||
Net
(loss) income per limited partner unit (basic
and diluted)
|
$
|
(6.51
|
)
|
$
|
0.93
|
$
|
(8.13
|
)
|
$
|
0.84
|
NOTE
11. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Pursuant
to an omnibus agreement, we paid EnerVest $1.3 million and $0.6 million in
the
three months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively, and $2.5 million and
$1.0 million in the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively,
in
monthly administrative fees for providing us general and administrative
services. These fees are included in general and administrative expenses in
our
condensed consolidated statement of operations.
On
January 31, 2007, we acquired natural gas properties in Michigan for $69.5
million, net of cash acquired, from certain institutional partnerships managed
by EnerVest, and on March 30, 2007, we acquired additional natural gas
properties in the Monroe Field in Louisiana from an institutional partnership
managed by EnerVest for $95.4 million (see Note 3).
We
have
entered into operating agreements with EnerVest whereby a subsidiary of EnerVest
acts as contract operator of the oil and natural gas wells and related gathering
systems and production facilities in which we own an interest. We reimbursed
EnerVest $2.2 million and $1.6 million in the three months ended June 30, 2008
and 2007, respectively, and $4.4 million $2.4 million in the six months ended
June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively, for direct expenses incurred in the
operation of our wells and related gathering systems and production facilities
and for the allocable share of the costs of EnerVest employees who performed
services on our properties. These costs are included in lease operating expenses
in our condensed consolidated statement of operations. Additionally, in its
role
as contract operator, this EnerVest subsidiary also collects proceeds from
oil
and natural gas sales and distributes them to us and other working interest
owners. We believe that the aforementioned services were provided to us at
fair
and reasonable rates relative to the prevailing market.
During
the three months ended March 31, 2007, we sold $1.3 million of natural gas
to
EnerVest Monroe Marketing, Ltd. (“EnerVest Monroe Marketing”), a subsidiary of
one of the EnerVest partnerships. On March 30, 2007, we acquired EnerVest Monroe
Marketing in our acquisition of natural gas properties in the Monroe Field
in
Louisiana (see Note 3).
10
EV
Energy Partners, L.P.
Notes
to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
NOTE
12. OTHER SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION
Supplemental
cash flows and non-cash transactions were as follows:
Six Months Ended June 30,
|
|||||||
2008
|
2007
|
||||||
Supplemental
cash flows information:
|
|||||||
Cash
paid for interest
|
$
|
7,270
|
$
|
2,157
|
|||
Cash
paid for income taxes
|
54
|
–
|
|||||
Non–cash
transactions:
|
|||||||
Costs
for development of oil and natural gas properties in accounts payable
and
accrued liabilities
|
382
|
(517
|
)
|
NOTE
13. NEW ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
In
September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued
SFAS No. 157, Fair
Value Measurements,
to
provide guidance for using fair value to measure assets and liabilities. SFAS
No. 157 was to be effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years
beginning after November 15, 2007, and interim periods within those fiscal
years; however, in February 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position FAS 157-2,
Effective
Date of FASB Statement No. 157,
which
delayed the effective date of SFAS No. 157 for all nonfinancial assets and
nonfinancial liabilities, except those that are recognized or disclosed at
fair
value in the financial statements on a recurring basis, for one year. We adopted
SFAS No. 157 on January 1, 2008 for our financial assets and financial
liabilities.
SFAS
157
establishes a valuation hierarchy for disclosure of the inputs to valuation
used
to measure fair value. This hierarchy prioritizes the inputs into the following
three levels:
· |
Level
1 inputs are quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical
assets or liabilities.
|
· |
Level
2 inputs are quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in
active
markets or inputs that are observable for the asset or liability,
either
directly or indirectly through market corroboration.
|
· |
Level
3 inputs are unobservable inputs based on our own assumptions used
to
measure assets and liabilities at fair value.
|
A
financial asset or liability’s classification within the hierarchy is determined
based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value
measurement.
The
following table presents the fair value hierarchy table for our assets and
liabilities that are required to be measured at fair value on a recurring
basis:
Fair
Value Measurements at June 30, 2008 Using:
|
|||||||||||||
Total
Carrying
Value
|
Quoted Prices
in Active
Markets for
Identical
Assets
(Level 1)
|
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
|
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
|
||||||||||
Derivative instruments
|
$
|
(177,632
|
)
|
$
|
–
|
$
|
(177,632
|
)
|
$
|
–
|
Our
derivative instruments consist of over-the-counter (“OTC”) contracts which are
not traded on a public exchange. These derivative instruments are
indexed to active trading hubs for the underlying commodity, and are OTC
contracts commonly used in the energy industry and offered by a number of
financial institutions and large energy companies.
As
the
fair value of these derivative instruments is based on inputs using market
prices obtained from independent brokers or determined using quantitative models
that use as their basis readily observable market parameters that are actively
quoted and can be validated through external sources, including third-party
pricing services, brokers and market transactions, we have categorized these
derivative instruments as Level 2.
11
EV
Energy Partners, L.P.
Notes
to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
We
will
adopt SFAS No. 157 on January 1, 2009 for our nonfinancial assets and
nonfinancial liabilities, and we have not yet determined the impact, if any,
on
our consolidated financial statements.
In
February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, The
Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities - Including
an
amendment of FASB Statement No. 115.
SFAS
No. 159 permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and
certain other items at fair value that are not currently required to be measured
at fair value. Unrealized gains and losses on items for which the fair value
option has been selected are reported in earnings. SFAS No. 159 also establishes
presentation and disclosure requirements designed to facilitate comparisons
between entities that choose different measurement attributes for similar types
of assets and liabilities. SFAS No. 159 is effective for fiscal years beginning
after November 15, 2007. We have elected not to apply the provisions of SFAS
No.
159.
In
December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No 141 (Revised 2007), Business
Combinations
(“SFAS
No. 141(R)”) to significantly change the accounting for business combinations.
Under SFAS No. 141(R), an acquiring entity will be required to recognize all
the
assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a transaction at the acquisition
date
fair value with limited exceptions and will change the accounting treatment
for
certain specific items, including:
·
|
acquisition
costs will generally be expensed as
incurred;
|
·
|
noncontrolling
interests will be valued at fair value at the date of acquisition;
and
|
·
|
liabilities
related to contingent consideration will be recorded at fair value
at the
date of acquisition and subsequently remeasured each subsequent reporting
period.
|
SFAS
No.
141(R) is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. We
will
adopt SFAS No. 141(R) on January 1, 2009, and we have not yet determined the
impact, if any, on our consolidated financial statements.
In
December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, Noncontrolling
Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements - An Amendment of ARB No.
51,
to
establish new accounting and reporting standards for the noncontrolling interest
in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary. SFAS No. 160
requires the recognition of a noncontrolling interest (minority interest) as
equity in the consolidated financial statements and separate from the parent’s
equity. The amount of net income attributable to the noncontrolling interest
will be included in consolidated net income on the face of the income statement.
SFAS No. 160 clarifies that changes in a parent’s ownership interest in a
subsidiary that do not result in deconsolidation are equity transactions if
the
parent retains its controlling financial interest. In addition, SFAS No. 160
requires that a parent recognize a gain or loss in net income when a subsidiary
is deconsolidated. SFAS No. 160 also includes expanded disclosure requirements
regarding the interests of the parent and its noncontrolling interest. SFAS
No.
160 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. We will
adopt SFAS No. 160 on January 1, 2009, and we have not yet determined the
impact, if any, on our consolidated financial statements.
In
March
2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, Disclosures
about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities—an amendment of FASB
Statement No. 133. SFAS
No.
161 requires
enhanced disclosures about an entity’s derivative and hedging activities and how
they affect an entity’s financial position, financial performance and cash
flows. SFAS No. 161 is effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning
after November 15, 2008. We will adopt SFAS No. 161 on January 1,
2009, and we have not yet determined the impact, if any, on our consolidated
financial statements.
In
March
2008, the FASB issued Emerging Issues Task Force 07-04, Application
of the Two-Class Method under FASB Statement No. 128, Earnings per Share, to
Master Limited Partnerships
(“EITF
07-04”), to provide guidance as to how current period earnings should be
allocated between limited partners and a general partner when the partnership
agreement contains incentive distribution rights. EITF 07-04 is effective for
fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. We will adopt EITF 07-04 on
January 1, 2009, and we have not yet determined the impact, if any, on our
consolidated financial statements.
In
May
2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 162, The
Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles.
SFAS No.
162 identifies the sources for accounting principles and the framework for
selecting the principles to be used in preparing financial statements of
nongovernmental entities that are presented in conformity with generally
accepted accounting principles (GAAP) in the United States. SFAS No. 162 is
effective 60 days following the Securities and Exchanges Commission's approval
of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board Auditing amendments to AU
Section 411, The
Meaning of Present Fairly in Conformity with Generally Accepted Accounting
Principles.
NOTE
14. SUBSEQUENT EVENT
In
August
2008, we entered into four agreements to acquire oil and natural gas
properties
in the San Juan Basin, the Mid-Continent area (Oklahoma, Texas Panhandle
and
Kansas), Eastland County, Texas and West Virginia for $202.7 million.
We are
acquiring the San Juan Basin oil and natural gas properties from institutional
partnerships managed by EnerVest and the West Virginia natural gas properties
from EnerVest. In addition, we are acquiring the Mid-Continent area oil
and
natural gas properties from a company sponsored by investment funds formed
by
EnCap Investments, L.P. (“EnCap”). These acquisitions, which have been approved
by the board of directors of EV Management, are expected to close between
the
end of August and mid-September, and are subject to customary closing
conditions
and purchase price adjustments.
We
plan
to initially finance these acquisitions with borrowings under an amended
and
restated credit facility. We have agreed with EnerVest that it will receive
its
share of the net proceeds, estimated to be approximately $35.0 million,
in our
common units based on the volume weighted average price of the common
units from
August 7, 2008 through August 14, 2008; however, in order to receive
common
units, EnerVest must receive the consent of the investors in its institutional
partnerships. If EnerVest does not receive the consent, only approximately
$5.0
million of the estimated proceeds to EnerVest will be paid in common
units, and
the balance will be paid in cash.
12
ITEM
2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS
Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations should
be read in conjunction with our condensed consolidated financial statements
and
the related notes thereto, as well as our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2007.
OVERVIEW
We
are a
Delaware limited partnership formed in April 2006 by EnerVest to acquire,
produce and develop oil and natural gas properties. Our general partner is
EV
Energy GP, a Delaware limited partnership, and the general partner of our
general partner is EV Management, a Delaware limited liability
company.
In
May
2008, we acquired oil properties in South Central Texas for $17.5 million (the
“Charlotte acquisition”). The acquisition was primarily funded with borrowings
under our credit facility.
In
August
2008, we entered into four agreements to acquire oil and natural gas
properties
in the San Juan Basin, the Mid-Continent area (Oklahoma, Texas Panhandle
and
Kansas), Eastland County, Texas and West Virginia for $202.7 million.
We are
acquiring the San Juan Basin oil and natural gas properties from institutional
partnerships managed by EnerVest and the West Virginia natural gas
properties
from EnerVest. In addition, we are acquiring the Mid-Continent area
oil and
natural gas properties from a company sponsored by investment funds
formed by
EnCap. These acquisitions, which have been approved by the board of
directors of
EV Management, are expected to close between the end of August and
mid-September, and are subject to customary closing conditions and
purchase
price adjustments.
We
plan
to initially finance these acquisitions with borrowings under an amended
and
restated credit facility. We have agreed with EnerVest that it will
receive its
share of the net proceeds, estimated to be approximately $35.0 million,
in our
common units based on the volume weighted average price of the common
units from
August 7, 2008 through August 14, 2008; however, in order to receive common
units, EnerVest must receive the consent of the investors in its institutional
partnerships. If EnerVest does not receive the consent, only approximately
$5.0
million of the estimated proceeds to EnerVest will be paid in common
units, and
the balance will be paid in cash.
In
2007,
we completed the following acquisitions (collectively, the “2007
acquisitions”):
·
|
in
January, we acquired natural gas properties in Michigan (the “Michigan
acquisition”) from an institutional partnership managed by EnerVest for
$69.5 million, net of cash
acquired;
|
·
|
in
March, we acquired additional natural gas properties in the Monroe
Field
in Louisiana (the “Monroe acquisition”) from an institutional partnership
managed by EnerVest for $95.4
million;
|
·
|
in
June, we acquired oil and natural gas properties in Central and East
Texas
from Anadarko Petroleum Corporation (the “Anadarko acquisition”) for $93.6
million;
|
·
|
in
October, we acquired oil and natural gas properties in the Permian
Basin
from Plantation Operating, LLC, a company sponsored by investment
funds
formed by EnCap (the “Plantation acquisition”) for $154.7 million;
and
|
·
|
in
December, we acquired oil and natural gas properties in the Appalachian
Basin (the “Appalachian acquisition”) from an institutional partnership
managed by EnerVest for $59.6
million.
|
Our
Assets
As
of
December 31, 2007, our properties were located in the Appalachian Basin
(primarily in Ohio and West Virginia), Michigan, the Monroe Field in Northern
Louisiana, Central and East Texas, the Permian Basin and the Mid-Continent
areas
in Oklahoma, Texas and Louisiana. Our oil and natural gas properties had
estimated net proved reserves of 4.5 MMBbls of oil, 250.0 Bcf of natural gas
and
8.7 MMBbls of natural gas liquids, or 329.6 Bcfe, and a standardized measure
of
$679.9 million.
BUSINESS
ENVIRONMENT
Our
primary business objective is to provide stability and growth in cash
distributions per unit over time. The amount of cash we can distribute on our
units principally depends upon the amount of cash generated from our operations,
which will fluctuate from quarter to quarter based on, among other
things:
·
the
prices at which we will sell our oil and natural gas production;
·
our
ability to hedge commodity prices;
·
the
amount of oil and natural gas we produce; and
· the
level
of our operating and administrative costs.
Oil
and
natural gas prices have been, and are expected to be, volatile. Prices for
oil
and natural gas fluctuate widely in response to relatively minor changes in
the
supply of and demand for oil and natural gas, market uncertainty and a variety
of factors beyond our control. Factors affecting the price of oil include the
lack of excess productive capacity, geopolitical activities, worldwide supply
disruptions, worldwide economic conditions, weather conditions, actions taken
by
the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries and the value of the U.S.
dollar in international currency markets. Factors affecting the price of natural
gas include North American weather conditions, industrial and consumer demand
for natural gas, storage levels of natural gas and the availability and
accessibility of natural gas deposits in North America.
13
As
of
June 30, 2008, we are a party to derivative agreements, and we intend to enter
into derivative agreements in the future to reduce the impact of oil and natural
gas price volatility on our cash flows. By removing a significant portion of
our
price volatility on our future oil and natural gas production, we have
mitigated, but not eliminated, the potential effects of changing oil and natural
gas prices on our cash flows from operations for those periods.
The
primary factors affecting our production levels are capital availability, our
ability to make accretive acquisitions, the success of our drilling program
and
our inventory of drilling prospects. In addition, we face the challenge of
natural production declines. As initial reservoir pressures are depleted,
production from a given well decreases. We attempt to overcome this natural
decline by drilling to find additional reserves and acquiring more reserves
than
we produce. Our future growth will depend on our ability to continue to add
reserves in excess of production. We will maintain our focus on costs to add
reserves through drilling and acquisitions as well as the costs necessary to
produce such reserves. Our ability to add reserves through drilling is dependent
on our capital resources and can be limited by many factors, including our
ability to timely obtain drilling permits and regulatory approvals. Any delays
in drilling, completion or connection to gathering lines of our new wells will
negatively impact our production, which may have an adverse effect on our
revenues and, as a result, cash available for distribution.
Higher
oil and natural gas prices have led to higher demand for drilling rigs,
operating personnel and field supplies and services, and have caused increases
in the costs of these goods and services. We focus our efforts on increasing
oil
and natural gas reserves and production while controlling costs at a level
that
is appropriate for long-term operations. Our future cash flows from operations
are dependent on our ability to manage our overall cost structure.
RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS
Three Months Ended June 30,
|
Six Months Ended June 30,
|
||||||||||||
2008
|
2007
|
2008
|
2007
|
||||||||||
Production
data:
|
|||||||||||||
Oil
(MBbls)
|
97
|
32
|
190
|
63
|
|||||||||
Natural
gas liquids (MBbls)
|
135
|
3
|
259
|
3
|
|||||||||
Natural
gas (MMcf)
|
3,403
|
2,143
|
7,020
|
3,301
|
|||||||||
Net
production (MMcfe)
|
4,797
|
2,352
|
9,712
|
3,698
|
|||||||||
Average
sales price per unit:
|
|||||||||||||
Oil
(Bbl)
|
$
|
121.72
|
$
|
60.93
|
$
|
108.97
|
$
|
57.77
|
|||||
Natural
gas liquids (Bbl)
|
67.57
|
40.87
|
64.26
|
40.87
|
|||||||||
Natural
gas (Mcf)
|
10.63
|
7.34
|
9.16
|
7.29
|
|||||||||
Average
unit cost per Mcfe:
|
|||||||||||||
Production
costs:
|
|||||||||||||
Lease
operating expenses
|
$
|
1.99
|
$
|
1.79
|
$
|
1.93
|
$
|
1.76
|
|||||
Production
taxes
|
0.54
|
0.20
|
0.48
|
0.23
|
|||||||||
Total
|
2.53
|
1.99
|
2.41
|
1.99
|
|||||||||
Depreciation,
depletion and amortization
|
1.63
|
1.49
|
1.68
|
1.50
|
|||||||||
General
and administrative expenses
|
0.74
|
0.91
|
0.72
|
1.01
|
Three
Months Ended June 30, 2008 Compared with the Three Months Ended June 30,
2007
Oil,
natural gas and natural gas liquids revenues for the three months ended
June 30,
2008 totaled $57.1 million, an increase of $39.3 million compared with
the three
months ended June 30, 2007. This increase was primarily the result
of $31.9
million related to the oil and natural gas properties that we acquired
in the
Charlotte, Anadarko, Plantation and Appalachia acquisitions and $9.9
million
related to higher prices for oil, natural gas and natural gas liquids
partially
offset by a decrease of $2.5 million related to lower natural gas production
primarily related to pipeline curtailments at our natural gas properties
in the
Monroe Field. These curtailments reduced production from the Monroe
Field during
the three months ended June 30, 2008 by approximately 166 Mmcf (an
average of
approximately 3.3 Mmcf per day during the period of curtailment). These
curtailments are currently expected to continue into the fourth quarter of
2008; however, during any period of significant curtailment, we are
contractually entitled to receive payment from the purchaser for the
amount of
natural gas production that has been curtailed, subject to the purchaser
recouping such amounts out of a percentage of future production during
periods
when such production is not curtailed.
14
Transportation
and marketing-related revenues for the three months ended June 30, 2008
decreased $1.1 million compared with the three months ended June 30, 2007
primarily due to a decrease in volume of natural gas transported through our
gathering systems in the Monroe Field.
Lease
operating expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2008 increased $5.3
million compared with the three months ended June 30, 2007 primarily as the
result of $5.1 million of lease operating expenses associated with the oil
and
natural gas properties that we acquired in the Charlotte, Anadarko, Plantation
and Appalachia acquisitions. Lease operating expenses per Mcfe were $1.99 in
the
three months ended June 30, 2008 compared with $1.79 in the three months ended
June 30, 2007. This increase is primarily the result of the Charlotte, Anadarko,
Plantation and Appalachia acquisitions having lease operating expenses of $1.91
per Mcfe for the three months ended June 30, 2008 and higher lease operating
expenses per Mcfe for the three months ended June 30, 2008 at our natural gas
properties in the Monroe Field due to the effect of curtailments.
The
cost
of purchased natural gas for the three months ended June 30, 2008 decreased
$1.0
million compared with the three months ended June 30, 2007 primarily due to
a
decrease in the volume of natural gas that we purchased and transported through
our gathering systems in the Monroe Field.
Production
taxes for the three months ended June 30, 2008 increased $2.1 million compared
with the three months ended June 30, 2007 primarily as the result of $1.9
million of production taxes associated with the oil and natural gas properties
that we acquired in the Charlotte, Anadarko, Plantation and Appalachia
acquisitions. Production taxes for the three months ended June 30, 2008 were
$0.54 per Mcfe compared with $0.20 per Mcfe for the three months ended June
30,
2007. This increase is primarily the result of the Charlotte, Anadarko,
Plantation and Appalachia acquisitions having production taxes of $0.70 per
Mcfe
for the three months ended June 30, 2008.
Depreciation,
depletion and amortization for the three months ended June 30, 2008 increased
$4.3 million compared with the three months ended June 30, 2007 primarily due
the oil and natural gas properties that we acquired in the Charlotte, Anadarko,
Plantation and Appalachia acquisitions. Depreciation, depletion and amortization
for the three months ended June 30, 2008 was $1.63 per Mcfe compared with $1.49
per Mcfe for the three months ended June 30, 2007. This increase is primarily
due to the oil and natural gas properties that we acquired in the Charlotte,
Anadarko, Plantation and Appalachia acquisitions having depreciation, depletion
and amortization of $1.85 per Mcfe for the three months ended June 30, 2008.
General
and administrative expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2008 totaled
$3.6 million, an increase of $1.4 million compared with the three months ended
June 30, 2007. This increase is primarily the result of (i) an increase of
$0.6
million of fees paid to EnerVest under the omnibus agreement, (ii) an increase
of $0.5 million in compensation cost related to our phantom units, (iii) an
increase of $0.2 million in audit and tax costs and (iv) an overall increase
in
costs related to our significant growth. General and administrative expenses
were $0.74 per Mcfe in the three months ended June 30, 2008 compared with $0.91
per Mcfe in the three months ended June 30, 2007.
Due
to
the significant increase in oil, natural gas and natural gas liquids prices,
(loss) gain on mark-to-market derivatives, net for the three months ended June
30, 2008 included $12.2 million of net realized losses and $118.7 million of
unrealized losses on the mark-to-market of derivatives.
Six
Months Ended June 30, 2007 Compared with the Six Months Ended June 30,
2006
Oil,
natural gas and natural gas liquids revenues for the six months ended June
30,
2008 totaled $101.7 million, an increase of $73.8 million compared with the
six
months ended June 30, 2007. This increase was primarily the result of (i) $65.6
million related to the oil and natural gas properties that we acquired in the
Charlotte acquisition and the 2007 acquisitions, (ii) $7.9 million related
to
higher prices for oil, natural gas liquids and natural gas and (iii) $0.3
million related to higher production.
Transportation
and marketing-related revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2008 increased
$0.9 million compared with the six months ended June 30, 2007 primarily due
to
transportation and marketing-related revenues from the Monroe acquisition
partially offset by a decrease in the volume of natural gas transported through
our gathering systems.
15
Lease
operating expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2008 increased $12.2
million compared with the six months ended June 30, 2007 primarily as the result
of $12.1 million of lease operating expenses associated with the oil and natural
gas properties that we acquired in the Charlotte acquisition and the 2007
acquisitions. Lease operating expenses per Mcfe were $1.93 in the six months
ended June 30, 2008 compared with $1.76 in the six months ended June 30, 2007.
This increase is primarily the result of the Charlotte acquisition and the
2007
acquisitions having lease operating expenses of $2.02 per Mcfe for the six
months ended June 30, 2008.
The
cost
of purchased natural gas for the six months ended June 30, 2008 increased $0.5
million compared with the six months ended June 30, 2007 primarily due to costs
from the Monroe acquisition partially offset by a decrease in the volume of
natural gas that we purchased.
Production
taxes for the six months ended June 30, 2008 increased $3.8 million compared
with the six months ended June 30, 2007 primarily as the result of $3.6 million
of production taxes associated with the oil and natural gas properties that
we
acquired in the Charlotte acquisition and the 2007 acquisitions. Production
taxes for the six months ended June 30, 2008 were $0.48 per Mcfe compared with
$0.23 per Mcfe for the six months ended June 30, 2007. This increase is
primarily the result of the Charlotte acquisition and the 2007 acquisitions
having production taxes of $0.60 per Mcfe for the six months ended June 30,
2008.
Depreciation,
depletion and amortization for the six months ended June 30, 2008 increased
$10.8 million compared with the six months ended June 30, 2007 primarily due
to
the oil and natural gas properties that we acquired in the Charlotte acquisition
and the 2007 acquisitions. Depreciation, depletion and amortization for the
six
months ended June 30, 2008 was $1.68 per Mcfe compared with $1.50 per Mcfe
for
the six months ended June 30, 2007. This increase is primarily due to the oil
and natural gas properties that we acquired in the Charlotte acquisition and
the
2007 acquisitions having depreciation, depletion and amortization of $1.84
per
Mcfe for the six months ended June 30, 2008.
General
and administrative expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2008 totaled
$7.0
million, an increase of $3.3 million compared with the six months ended June
30,
2007. This increase is primarily the result of (i) an increase of $1.4 million
of fees paid to EnerVest under the omnibus agreement, (ii) an increase of $0.7
million in compensation cost related to our phantom units, (iii) an increase
of
$0.6 million in audit and tax costs and (iv) an overall increase in costs
related to our significant growth. General and administrative expenses were
$0.72 per Mcfe in the six months ended June 30, 2008 compared with $1.01 per
Mcfe in the six months ended June 30, 2007.
Due
to
the significant increase in oil, natural gas and natural gas liquids prices,
(loss) gain on mark-to-market derivatives, net for the six months ended June
30,
2008 included $14.4 million of net realized losses and $159.1 million of
unrealized losses on the mark-to-market of derivatives.
LIQUIDITY
AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Our
primary sources of liquidity and capital have been issuances of equity
securities, borrowings under our credit facility and cash flows from operations.
Our primary uses of cash have been acquisitions of oil and natural gas
properties and related assets, development of our oil and natural gas
properties, distributions to our partners and working capital needs. For 2008,
we believe that cash on hand, net cash flows generated from operations and
borrowings under our credit facility will be adequate to fund our capital budget
and satisfy our short-term liquidity needs. We may also utilize various
financing sources available to us, including the issuance of additional common
units through public offerings or private placements, to fund our long-term
liquidity needs. Our ability to complete future offerings of our common units
and the timing of these offerings will depend upon various factors including
prevailing market conditions and our financial condition.
Available
Credit Facility
We
have a
$500.0 million senior secured credit facility that expires in October 2012.
Borrowings under the facility are secured by a first priority lien on
substantially all of our assets and the assets of our subsidiaries. We may
use
borrowings under the facility for acquiring and developing oil and natural
gas
properties, for working capital purposes, for general corporate purposes and
for
funding distributions to partners. We also may use up to $50.0 million of
available borrowing capacity for letters of credit. The facility contains
certain covenants which, among other things, require the maintenance of a
current ratio (as defined in the facility) of greater than 1.0 and a ratio
of
total debt to earnings plus interest expense, taxes, depreciation, depletion
and
amortization expense and exploration expense of no greater than 4.0 to 1.0.
As
of June 30, 2008, we were in compliance with all of the facility
covenants.
16
Borrowings
under the facility will bear interest at a floating rate based on, at our
election, a base rate or the London Inter-Bank Offered Rate plus applicable
premiums based on the percent of the borrowing base that we have outstanding.
The amount of borrowings that we may have outstanding is subject to scheduled
redeterminations on a semi-annual basis with an additional redetermination
once
per calendar year at our request or at the request of the lenders and with
one
calculation that may be made at our request during each calendar year in
connection with material acquisitions or divestitures of properties. As of
June
30, 2008, the borrowing base was $325.0 million.
At
June
30, 2008, we had $287.0 million outstanding under the facility.
Cash
Flows
Cash
flows provided (used) by type of activity were as follows:
Six Months Ended June 30,
|
|||||||
2008
|
2007
|
||||||
Operating
activities
|
$
|
38,369
|
$
|
21,069
|
|||
Investing
activities
|
(31,088
|
)
|
(262,046
|
)
|
|||
Financing
activities
|
(2,994
|
)
|
252,403
|
Operating
Activities
Cash
flows from operating activities provided $38.4 million and $21.1 million in
the
six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The increase reflects
our
significant growth primarily as a result of our acquisitions.
Investing
Activities
Our
principal recurring investing activity is the acquisition and development of
oil
and natural gas properties. During the six months ended June 30, 2008, we spent
$17.5 million on the Charlotte acquisition and $13.6 million for the development
of our oil and natural gas properties. During the six months ended June 30,
2007, we spent $258.9 million for the Michigan, Monroe and Anadarko acquisitions
and $3.1 million for the development of our oil and natural gas properties.
Financing
Activities
During
the six months ended June 30, 2008, we borrowed $17.0 million to finance the
Charlotte acquisition and we paid distributions of $19.9 million to our general
partners and holders of our common and subordinated units.
During
the six months ended June 30, 2007, we received net proceeds of $219.9 million
from our private equity offerings in February and June 2007. From these net
proceeds, we repaid $196.4 million of borrowings outstanding under our credit
facility. We borrowed $243.4 million under our credit facility to
finance the Michigan, Monroe and Anadarko acquisitions. We paid $8.5
million of distributions to holders of our common and subordinated units. In
addition, we recorded deemed distributions of $5.8 million related to the
difference between the purchase price allocations and the amounts paid for
the
Michigan and Monroe acquisitions.
NEW
ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
In
September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued
SFAS No. 157, Fair
Value Measurements,
to
provide guidance for using fair value to measure assets and liabilities. SFAS
No. 157 was to be effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years
beginning after November 15, 2007, and interim periods within those fiscal
years; however, in February 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position FAS 157-2,
Effective
Date of FASB Statement No. 157,
which
delayed the effective date of SFAS No. 157 for all nonfinancial assets and
nonfinancial liabilities, except those that are recognized or disclosed at
fair
value in the financial statements on a recurring basis, for one year. We adopted
SFAS No. 157 on January 1, 2008 for our financial assets and financial
liabilities.
SFAS
157
establishes a valuation hierarchy for disclosure of the inputs to valuation
used
to measure fair value. This hierarchy prioritizes the inputs into the following
three levels:
· |
Level
1 inputs are quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical
assets or liabilities.
|
17
· |
Level
2 inputs are quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in
active
markets or inputs that are observable for the asset or liability,
either
directly or indirectly through market corroboration.
|
· |
Level
3 inputs are unobservable inputs based on our own assumptions used
to
measure assets and liabilities at fair value.
|
A
financial asset or liability’s classification within the hierarchy is determined
based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value
measurement.
The
following table presents the fair value hierarchy table for our assets and
liabilities that are required to be measured at fair value on a recurring
basis:
Fair Value Measurements at June 30, 2008 Using:
|
|||||||||||||
Total
Carrying
Value
|
Quoted Prices
in Active
Markets for
Identical
Assets
(Level 1)
|
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
|
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
|
||||||||||
Derivative
instruments
|
$
|
(177,632
|
)
|
$
|
–
|
$
|
(177,632
|
)
|
$
|
–
|
Our
derivative instruments consist of over-the-counter (“OTC”) contracts which are
not traded on a public exchange. These derivative instruments are
indexed to active trading hubs for the underlying commodity, and are OTC
contracts commonly used in the energy industry and offered by a number of
financial institutions and large energy companies.
As
the
fair value of these derivative instruments is based on inputs using market
prices obtained from independent brokers or determined using quantitative models
that use as their basis readily observable market parameters that are actively
quoted and can be validated through external sources, including third-party
pricing services, brokers and market transactions, we have categorized these
derivative instruments as Level 2.
We
will
adopt SFAS No. 157 on January 1, 2009 for our nonfinancial assets and
nonfinancial liabilities, and we have not yet determined the impact, if any,
on
our consolidated financial statements.
In
February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, The
Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities - Including
an
amendment of FASB Statement No. 115.
SFAS
No. 159 permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and
certain other items at fair value that are not currently required to be measured
at fair value. Unrealized gains and losses on items for which the fair value
option has been selected are reported in earnings. SFAS No. 159 also establishes
presentation and disclosure requirements designed to facilitate comparisons
between entities that choose different measurement attributes for similar types
of assets and liabilities. SFAS No. 159 is effective for fiscal years beginning
after November 15, 2007. We have elected not to apply the provisions of SFAS
No.
159.
In
December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No 141 (Revised 2007), Business
Combinations
(“SFAS
No. 141(R)”) to significantly change the accounting for business combinations.
Under SFAS No. 141(R), an acquiring entity will be required to recognize all
the
assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a transaction at the acquisition
date
fair value with limited exceptions and will change the accounting treatment
for
certain specific items, including:
·
|
acquisition
costs will generally be expensed as
incurred;
|
·
|
noncontrolling
interests will be valued at fair value at the date of acquisition;
and
|
·
|
liabilities
related to contingent consideration will be recorded at fair value
at the
date of acquisition and subsequently remeasured each subsequent reporting
period.
|
SFAS
No.
141(R) is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. We
will
adopt SFAS No. 141(R) on January 1, 2009, and we have not yet determined the
impact, if any, on our consolidated financial statements.
18
In
December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, Noncontrolling
Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements - An Amendment of ARB No.
51,
to
establish new accounting and reporting standards for the noncontrolling interest
in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary. SFAS No. 160
requires the recognition of a noncontrolling interest (minority interest) as
equity in the consolidated financial statements and separate from the parent’s
equity. The amount of net income attributable to the noncontrolling interest
will be included in consolidated net income on the face of the income statement.
SFAS No. 160 clarifies that changes in a parent’s ownership interest in a
subsidiary that do not result in deconsolidation are equity transactions if
the
parent retains its controlling financial interest. In addition, SFAS No. 160
requires that a parent recognize a gain or loss in net income when a subsidiary
is deconsolidated. SFAS No. 160 also includes expanded disclosure requirements
regarding the interests of the parent and its noncontrolling interest. SFAS
No.
160 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. We will
adopt SFAS No. 160 on January 1, 2009, and we have not yet determined the
impact, if any, on our consolidated financial statements.
In
March
2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, Disclosures
about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities—an amendment of FASB
Statement No. 133. SFAS
No.
161 requires
enhanced disclosures about an entity’s derivative and hedging activities and how
they affect an entity’s financial position, financial performance and cash
flows. SFAS No. 161 is effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning
after November 15, 2008. We will adopt SFAS No. 161 on January 1,
2009, and we have not yet determined the impact, if any, on our consolidated
financial statements.
In
March
2008, the FASB issued Emerging Issues Task Force 07-04, Application
of the Two-Class Method under FASB Statement No. 128, Earnings per Share, to
Master Limited Partnerships
(“EITF
07-04”), to provide guidance as to how current period earnings should be
allocated between limited partners and a general partner when the partnership
agreement contains incentive distribution rights. EITF 07-04 is effective for
fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. We will adopt EITF 07-04 on
January 1, 2009, and we have not yet determined the impact, if any, on our
consolidated financial statements.
In
May
2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 162, The
Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles.
SFAS No.
162 identifies the sources for accounting principles and the framework for
selecting the principles to be used in preparing financial statements of
nongovernmental entities that are presented in conformity with generally
accepted accounting principles (GAAP) in the United States. SFAS No. 162 is
effective 60 days following the Securities and Exchanges Commission's approval
of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board Auditing amendments to AU
Section 411, The
Meaning of Present Fairly in Conformity with Generally Accepted Accounting
Principles.
FORWARD-LOOKING
STATEMENTS
All
of
our forward-looking information is subject to risks and uncertainties that
could
cause actual results to differ materially from the results expected. Although
it
is not possible to identify all factors, these risks and uncertainties include
the risk factors and the timing of any of those risk factors identified in
the
“Risk Factors” section included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2007. This document is available through our web site or
through the SEC’s Electronic Data Gathering and Analysis Retrieval System at
http://www.sec.gov.
19
ITEM
3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET
RISK
Our
business activities expose us to risks associated with changes in the market
price of oil and natural gas and as such, future earnings are subject to change
due to changes in these market prices. We use derivative instruments to reduce
our risk of changes in the prices of oil and natural gas. As of June 30, 2008,
we had entered into oil and natural gas derivative instruments with the
following terms:
Period
Covered
|
Index
|
Hedged
Volume
per Day
|
Weighted
Average
Fixed
Price
|
Weighted
Average
Floor
Price
|
Weighted
Average
Ceiling
Price
|
|||||||||||
Oil (Bbls):
|
||||||||||||||||
Swaps
– 2008
|
WTI
|
1,354
|
$
|
76.27
|
$
|
$
|
||||||||||
Collar
– 2008
|
WTI
|
125
|
62.00
|
73.95
|
||||||||||||
Swaps
– 2009
|
WTI
|
1,131
|
75.86
|
|||||||||||||
Collar
– 2009
|
WTI
|
125
|
62.00
|
73.90
|
||||||||||||
Swaps
– 2010
|
WTI
|
1,150
|
74.91
|
|||||||||||||
Swap
– 2011
|
WTI
|
150
|
98.55
|
|||||||||||||
Collar
– 2011
|
WTI
|
1,100
|
110.00
|
166.45
|
||||||||||||
Swap
– 2012
|
WTI
|
150
|
98.25
|
|||||||||||||
Collar
– 2012
|
WTI
|
1,000
|
110.00
|
170.85
|
||||||||||||
Natural
Gas (MMBtu):
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Swaps
– 2008
|
Dominion
Appalachia
|
6,500
|
9.07
|
|||||||||||||
Swaps
– 2009
|
Dominion
Appalachia
|
4,400
|
8.79
|
|||||||||||||
Swaps
– 2010
|
Dominion
Appalachia
|
5,600
|
8.65
|
|||||||||||||
Swap
– 2011
|
Dominion
Appalachia
|
2,500
|
8.69
|
|||||||||||||
Collar
– 2011
|
Dominion
Appalachia
|
3,000
|
9.00
|
12.15
|
||||||||||||
Collar
– 2012
|
Dominion
Appalachia
|
5,000
|
8.95
|
11.45
|
||||||||||||
Swaps
– 2008
|
NYMEX
|
4,000
|
8.85
|
|||||||||||||
Collars
– 2008
|
NYMEX
|
6,000
|
7.67
|
10.25
|
||||||||||||
Swaps
– 2009
|
NYMEX
|
4,500
|
8.00
|
|||||||||||||
Collars
– 2009
|
NYMEX
|
7,000
|
7.79
|
9.50
|
||||||||||||
Swaps
– 2010
|
NYMEX
|
7,500
|
8.44
|
|||||||||||||
Collar
– 2010
|
NYMEX
|
1,500
|
7.50
|
10.00
|
||||||||||||
Swaps
– 2011
|
NYMEX
|
8,000
|
8.96
|
|||||||||||||
Swaps
– 2012
|
NYMEX
|
8,000
|
9.77
|
|||||||||||||
Swaps
– 2008
|
MICHCON_NB
|
3,500
|
8.16
|
|||||||||||||
Collar
-2008
|
MICHCON_NB
|
2,000
|
8.00
|
9.55
|
||||||||||||
Swaps
– 2009
|
MICHCON_NB
|
5,000
|
8.27
|
|||||||||||||
Swap
– 2010
|
MICHCON_NB
|
5,000
|
8.34
|
|||||||||||||
Collar
– 2011
|
MICHCON_NB
|
4,500
|
8.70
|
11.85
|
||||||||||||
Collar
– 2012
|
MICHCON_NB
|
4,500
|
8.75
|
11.05
|
||||||||||||
Swaps
– 2008
|
HOUSTON
SC
|
5,206
|
8.16
|
|||||||||||||
Swaps
– 2009
|
HOUSTON
SC
|
4,320
|
8.29
|
|||||||||||||
Collar
– 2010
|
HOUSTON
SC
|
3,500
|
7.25
|
9.55
|
||||||||||||
Collar
– 2011
|
HOUSTON
SC
|
3,500
|
8.25
|
11.65
|
||||||||||||
Collar
– 2012
|
HOUSTON
SC
|
3,000
|
8.25
|
11.10
|
||||||||||||
Swap
– 2008
|
EL
PASO PERMIAN
|
3,000
|
7.23
|
|||||||||||||
Swap
– 2009
|
EL
PASO PERMIAN
|
2,500
|
7.93
|
|||||||||||||
Swap
– 2010
|
EL
PASO PERMIAN
|
2,500
|
7.68
|
|||||||||||||
Swap
– 2011
|
EL
PASO PERMIAN
|
2,500
|
9.30
|
|||||||||||||
Swap
– 2012
|
EL
PASO PERMIAN
|
2,000
|
9.21
|
20
In
addition, our floating rate credit facility exposes us to risks associated
with
changes in interest rates and as such, future earnings are subject to change
due
to changes in these interest rates. In June 2008, we entered into four interest
rate swaps to reduce our risk of changes in interest rates. As of June 30,
2008,
we had entered into interest rate swaps with the following terms:
Period
Covered
|
Notional
Amount
|
Fixed
Rate
|
|||||
July
2008 – July 2012
|
$
|
20,000
|
4.248
|
%
|
|||
July
2008 – July 2012
|
35,000
|
4.220
|
%
|
||||
July
2008 – July 2012
|
35,000
|
4.250
|
%
|
||||
July
2008 – July 2012
|
35,000
|
4.220
|
%
|
We
do not
designate these or future derivative agreements as hedges for accounting
purposes pursuant to SFAS No. 133, Accounting
for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities,
as
amended. Accordingly, the changes in the fair value of these agreements are
recognized currently in earnings. At June 30, 2008, the fair value associated
with these derivative agreements was a net liability of $177.6 million.
ITEM
4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
In
accordance with Exchange Act Rule 13a-15 and 15d-15, we carried out an
evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of management,
including our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, of the
effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the
period covered by this report. Based on that evaluation, our Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls
and
procedures were effective as of June 30, 2008 to provide reasonable assurance
that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed or submitted
under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within
the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and
forms. Our disclosure controls and procedures include controls and procedures
designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in reports filed
or
submitted under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our
management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer,
as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Change
in Internal Controls Over Financial Reporting
There
have not been any changes in our internal controls over financial reporting
that
occurred during the quarterly period ended June 30, 2008 that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controls
over financial reporting.
21
PART
II. OTHER INFORMATION
We
are
involved in disputes or legal actions arising in the ordinary course of
business. We do not believe the outcome of such disputes or legal actions will
have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial statements.
As
of the
date of this filing, there have been no significant changes from the risk
factors previously disclosed in our “Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007.
An
investment in our common units involves various risks. When considering an
investment in us, you should consider carefully all of the risk factors
described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2007. These risks and uncertainties are not the only ones facing us and there
may be additional matters that we are unaware of or that we currently consider
immaterial. All of these could adversely affect our business, financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows and, thus, the value of an
investment in us.
None.
ITEM
3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
None.
None.
ITEM
5. OTHER INFORMATION
None.
ITEM
6. EXHIBITS
The
exhibits listed below are filed or furnished as part of this
report:
+31.1
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)
Certification of Chief Executive Officer.
+31.2
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)
Certification of Chief Financial Officer.
+32
.1 Section 1350
Certification of Chief Executive Officer
+32.2 Section
1350 Certification of Chief Financial Officer
________________
+ Filed
herewith
22
SIGNATURES
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant
has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto
duly authorized.
EV
Energy Partners, L.P.
|
||
(Registrant)
|
||
Date:
August 11, 2008
|
By:
|
/s/
MICHAEL E. MERCER
|
Michael
E. Mercer
|
||
Senior
Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer
|
23
EXHIBIT
INDEX
+31.1
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)
Certification of Chief Executive Officer.
+31.2
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)
Certification of Chief Financial Officer.
+32
.1 Section 1350
Certification of Chief Executive Officer
+32.2 Section
1350 Certification of Chief Financial Officer
________________
+
Filed
herewith