Harvest Oil & Gas Corp. - Quarter Report: 2010 June (Form 10-Q)
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
Washington,
D.C. 20549
Form 10-Q
þ QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO
SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934
For
the quarterly period ended June 30, 2010
OR
o TRANSITION REPORT
PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934
Commission
File Number
001-33024
EV
Energy Partners, L.P.
(Exact
name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware
(State
or other jurisdiction
of
incorporation or organization)
|
20–4745690
(I.R.S.
Employer Identification No.)
|
|
1001
Fannin, Suite 800, Houston, Texas
(Address
of principal executive offices)
|
77002
(Zip
Code)
|
Registrant’s
telephone number, including area code: (713) 651-1144
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to
be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such
filing requirements for the past 90 days.
YES þ NO o
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on
its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be
submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this
chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to submit and post such files).
YES o NO o
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting
company. See definition of “accelerated filer,” “large accelerated
filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b–2 of the Exchange
Act. Check one:
Large
accelerated filer o
|
Accelerated
filer þ
|
Non-accelerated
filer o
|
Smaller
reporting company o
|
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in
Rule 12b–2 of the Exchange Act).
YES o NO þ
As of
August 5, 2010, the registrant had 27,060,313 common units
outstanding.
Table
of Contents
PART
I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
||
Item
1.
|
Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)
|
2
|
Item
2.
|
Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
|
14
|
Item
3.
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
|
20
|
Item
4.
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
20
|
PART
II. OTHER INFORMATION
|
||
Item
1.
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
21
|
Item
1A.
|
Risk
Factors
|
21
|
Item
2.
|
Unregistered
Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
|
21
|
Item
3.
|
Defaults
Upon Senior Securities
|
21
|
Item
4.
|
(Removed
and Reserved)
|
21
|
Item
5.
|
Other
Information
|
21
|
Item
6.
|
Exhibits
|
22
|
Signatures
|
23
|
1
PART
I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM
1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
EV
Energy Partners, L.P.
Condensed
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(In
thousands, except number of units)
(Unaudited)
June 30,
|
December 31,
|
|||||||
2010
|
2009
|
|||||||
ASSETS
|
||||||||
Current
assets:
|
||||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
$ | 17,292 | $ | 18,806 | ||||
Accounts
receivable:
|
||||||||
Oil,
natural gas and natural gas liquids revenues
|
17,250 | 14,599 | ||||||
Related
party
|
4,401 | 2,881 | ||||||
Other
|
1,097 | 1,034 | ||||||
Assets
held for sale
|
3,116 | – | ||||||
Derivative
asset
|
48,009 | 26,733 | ||||||
Other
current assets
|
748 | 625 | ||||||
Total
current assets
|
91,913 | 64,678 | ||||||
Oil
and natural gas properties, net of accumulated depreciation, depletion and
amortization; June 30, 2010, $147,290; December 31, 2009,
$121,970
|
907,208 | 771,752 | ||||||
Other
property, net of accumulated depreciation and amortization; June
30, 2010, $365; December 31, 2009, $319
|
1,732 | 742 | ||||||
Long–term
derivative asset
|
76,270 | 68,549 | ||||||
Other
assets
|
1,717 | 1,984 | ||||||
Total
assets
|
$ | 1,078,840 | $ | 907,705 | ||||
LIABILITIES
AND OWNERS’ EQUITY
|
||||||||
Current
liabilities:
|
||||||||
Accounts
payable and accrued liabilities
|
$ | 12,600 | $ | 10,310 | ||||
Derivative
liability
|
715 | 1,543 | ||||||
Total
current liabilities
|
13,315 | 11,853 | ||||||
Asset
retirement obligations
|
54,949 | 42,533 | ||||||
Long–term
debt
|
345,000 | 302,000 | ||||||
Long–term
liabilities
|
1,174 | 3,212 | ||||||
Long–term
derivative liability
|
– | 676 | ||||||
Commitments
and contingencies
|
||||||||
Owners’
equity:
|
||||||||
Common
unitholders – 27,060,313 units and 23,475,471 units issued and outstanding
as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively
|
667,055 | 548,160 | ||||||
General
partner interest
|
(2,653 | ) | (729 | ) | ||||
Total
owners’ equity
|
664,402 | 547,431 | ||||||
Total
liabilities and owners’ equity
|
$ | 1,078,840 | $ | 907,705 |
See
accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial
statements.
2
EV
Energy Partners, L.P.
Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Operations
(In
thousands, except per unit data)
(Unaudited)
Three Months Ended June 30,
|
Six Months Ended June 30,
|
|||||||||||||||
2010
|
2009
|
2010
|
2009
|
|||||||||||||
Revenues:
|
||||||||||||||||
Oil,
natural gas and natural gas liquids revenues
|
$ | 39,431 | $ | 25,156 | $ | 78,027 | $ | 51,163 | ||||||||
Transportation
and marketing–related revenues
|
1,476 | 1,832 | 3,054 | 5,050 | ||||||||||||
Total
revenues
|
40,907 | 26,988 | 81,081 | 56,213 | ||||||||||||
Operating
costs and expenses:
|
||||||||||||||||
Lease
operating expenses
|
14,869 | 9,507 | 26,301 | 20,654 | ||||||||||||
Cost
of purchased natural gas
|
1,095 | 975 | 2,315 | 2,451 | ||||||||||||
Production
taxes
|
1,673 | 1,216 | 3,800 | 2,643 | ||||||||||||
Asset
retirement obligations accretion expense
|
764 | 570 | 1,274 | 1,014 | ||||||||||||
Depreciation,
depletion and amortization
|
13,436 | 12,737 | 25,520 | 26,369 | ||||||||||||
General
and administrative expenses
|
5,825 | 4,098 | 10,549 | 8,351 | ||||||||||||
Gain
on sale of oil and natural gas properties
|
(4,388 | ) | – | (3,824 | ) | – | ||||||||||
Total
operating costs and expenses
|
33,274 | 29,103 | 65,935 | 61,482 | ||||||||||||
Operating
income (loss)
|
7,633 | (2,115 | ) | 15,146 | (5,269 | ) | ||||||||||
Other
income (expense), net:
|
||||||||||||||||
Realized
gains on mark–to–market derivatives, net
|
13,901 | 19,037 | 21,866 | 36,760 | ||||||||||||
Unrealized
(losses) gains on mark–to–market derivatives, net
|
(2,158 | ) | (44,500 | ) | 30,502 | (17,832 | ) | |||||||||
Interest
expense
|
(3,269 | ) | (3,968 | ) | (5,372 | ) | (6,844 | ) | ||||||||
Other
income (expense), net
|
252 | (52 | ) | 393 | (44 | ) | ||||||||||
Total
other income (expense), net
|
8,726 | (29,483 | ) | 47,389 | 12,040 | |||||||||||
Income
(loss) before income taxes
|
16,359 | (31,598 | ) | 62,535 | 6,771 | |||||||||||
Income
taxes
|
(79 | ) | (32 | ) | (131 | ) | (57 | ) | ||||||||
Net
income (loss)
|
$ | 16,280 | $ | (31,630 | ) | $ | 62,404 | $ | 6,714 | |||||||
General
partner’s interest in net income (loss), including incentive distribution
rights
|
$
|
2,624 |
|
$
|
1,063 | $ | 5,836 |
$
|
3,183 | |||||||
Limited
partners’ interest in net income (loss)
|
$ | 13,656 | $ | (32,693 | ) | $ | 56,568 | $ | 3,531 | |||||||
Net
income (loss) per limited partner unit:
|
||||||||||||||||
Basic
|
$ | 0.50 | $ | (1.93 | ) | $ | 2.14 | $ | 0.21 | |||||||
Diluted
|
$ | 0.50 | $ | (1.93 | ) | $ | 2.14 | $ | 0.21 | |||||||
Weighted
average limited partner units outstanding:
|
||||||||||||||||
Basic
|
27,210 | 16,926 | 26,403 | 16,572 | ||||||||||||
Diluted
|
27,264 | 16,926 | 26,438 | 16,572 | ||||||||||||
Distributions
declared per unit
|
$ | 0.757 | $ | 0.753 | $ | 1.513 | $ | 1.505 |
See
accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial
statements.
3
EV
Energy Partners, L.P.
Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Owners’ Equity
(In
thousands, except number of units)
(Unaudited)
Common
Unitholders
|
General
Partner
Interest
|
Total
Owners’
Equity
|
||||||||||
Balance,
December 31, 2009
|
$ | 548,160 | $ | (729 | ) | $ | 547,431 | |||||
Conversion
of 84,842 vested phantom units
|
2,580 | – | 2,580 | |||||||||
Proceeds
from public equity offering, net of underwriters discount
|
92,770 | – | 92,770 | |||||||||
Offering
costs
|
(154 | ) | – | (154 | ) | |||||||
Contribution
from general partner
|
– | 1,977 | 1,977 | |||||||||
Distributions
|
(38,284 | ) | (5,149 | ) | (43,433 | ) | ||||||
Equity–based
compensation
|
827 | – | 827 | |||||||||
Net
income
|
61,156 | 1,248 | 62,404 | |||||||||
Balance,
June 30, 2010
|
$ | 667,055 | $ | (2,653 | ) | $ | 664,402 |
Common
Unitholders
|
Subordinated
Unitholders
|
General
Partner
Interest
|
Total
Owners’
Equity
|
|||||||||||||
Balance,
December 31, 2008
|
$ | 432,031 | $ | 21,618 | $ | 3,835 | $ | 457,484 | ||||||||
Conversion
of 103,409 vested phantom units
|
1,706 | – | – | 1,706 | ||||||||||||
Proceeds
from public equity offering, net of underwriters discount
|
78,649 | – | – | 78,649 | ||||||||||||
Offering
costs
|
(219 | ) | – | – | (219 | ) | ||||||||||
Contribution
from general partner
|
– | – | 1,641 | 1,641 | ||||||||||||
Distributions
|
(19,735 | ) | (4,660 | ) | (3,255 | ) | (27,650 | ) | ||||||||
Equity–based
compensation
|
54 | – | – | 54 | ||||||||||||
Net
income
|
5,103 | 1,477 | 134 | 6,714 | ||||||||||||
Balance,
June 30, 2009
|
$ | 497,589 | $ | 18,435 | $ | 2,355 | $ | 518,379 |
See
accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial
statements.
4
EV
Energy Partners, L.P.
Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(In
thousands)
(Unaudited)
Six Months Ended June 30,
|
||||||||
2010
|
2009
|
|||||||
Cash
flows from operating activities:
|
||||||||
Net
income
|
$ | 62,404 | $ | 6,714 | ||||
Adjustments
to reconcile net income to net cash flows provided by operating
activities:
|
||||||||
Asset
retirement obligations accretion expense
|
1,274 | 1,014 | ||||||
Depreciation,
depletion and amortization
|
25,520 | 26,369 | ||||||
Equity–based
compensation cost
|
2,103 | 1,300 | ||||||
Gain
on sale of oil and natural gas properties
|
(3,824 | ) | – | |||||
Unrealized
(gains) losses on derivatives, net
|
(30,502 | ) | 17,832 | |||||
Amortization
of deferred loan costs
|
275 | 526 | ||||||
Other,
net
|
(1 | ) | 148 | |||||
Changes
in operating assets and liabilities:
|
||||||||
Accounts
receivable
|
(4,098 | ) | 7,057 | |||||
Prepaid
expenses and other current assets
|
2,625 | 114 | ||||||
Other
assets
|
– | (1 | ) | |||||
Accounts
payable and accrued liabilities
|
879 | (1,796 | ) | |||||
Deferred
revenues
|
– | (4,120 | ) | |||||
Long–term
liabilities
|
(734 | ) | – | |||||
Other
|
(119 | ) | 35 | |||||
Net
cash flows provided by operating activities
|
55,802 | 55,192 | ||||||
Cash
flows from investing activities:
|
||||||||
Acquisition
of oil and natural gas properties
|
(147,769 | ) | – | |||||
Deposit
on acquisition of oil and natural gas properties
|
– | (1,218 | ) | |||||
Development
of oil and natural gas properties
|
(8,170 | ) | (8,983 | ) | ||||
Proceeds
from sale of oil and natural gas properties
|
4,471 | – | ||||||
Net
cash flows used in investing activities
|
(151,468 | ) | (10,201 | ) | ||||
Cash
flows from financing activities:
|
||||||||
Long–term
debt borrowings
|
138,000 | – | ||||||
Repayment
of long–term debt borrowings
|
(95,000 | ) | (115,000 | ) | ||||
Loan
costs incurred
|
(8 | ) | – | |||||
Proceeds
from public equity offering, net of underwriters discount
|
92,770 | 78,649 | ||||||
Offering
costs
|
(154 | ) | (219 | ) | ||||
Contribution
from general partner
|
1,977 | 1,641 | ||||||
Distributions
to partners
|
(43,433 | ) | (27,650 | ) | ||||
Net
cash flows provided by (used in) financing activities
|
94,152 | (62,579 | ) | |||||
Decrease
in cash and cash equivalents
|
(1,514 | ) | (17,588 | ) | ||||
Cash
and cash equivalents – beginning of period
|
18,806 | 41,628 | ||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents – end of period
|
$ | 17,292 | $ | 24,040 |
See
accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial
statements.
5
EV
Energy Partners, L.P.
Notes
to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
NOTE
1. ORGANIZATION AND NATURE OF BUSINESS
Nature
of Operations
EV Energy
Partners, L.P. (“we,” “our” or “us”) is a publicly held limited partnership that
engages in the acquisition, development and production of oil and natural gas
properties. Our general partner is EV Energy GP, L.P. (“EV Energy
GP”), a Delaware limited partnership, and the general partner of our general
partner is EV Management, LLC (“EV Management”), a Delaware limited liability
company. EV Management is a wholly owned subsidiary of EnerVest, Ltd.
(“EnerVest”), a Texas limited partnership. EnerVest and its
affiliates also have a significant interest in us through their 71.25% ownership
of EV Energy GP which, in turn, owns a 2% general partner interest in us and all
of our incentive distribution rights.
Basis
of Presentation
Our
unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements included herein have been
prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the “SEC”). Accordingly, certain information and
disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance
with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America
have been condensed or omitted. We believe that the presentations and
disclosures herein are adequate to make the information not
misleading. The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements
reflect all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments) necessary
for a fair presentation of the interim periods. The results of
operations for the interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results
of operations to be expected for the full year. These interim
financial statements should be read in conjunction with our Annual Report on
Form 10–K for the year ended December 31, 2009.
All
intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in
consolidation. In the Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated
Financial Statements, all dollar and share amounts in tabulations are in
thousands of dollars and shares, respectively, unless otherwise
indicated.
NOTE 2. EQUITY–BASED
COMPENSATION
We grant
various forms of equity–based awards to employees, consultants and directors of
EV Management and its affiliates who perform services for us. These
equity–based awards consist primarily of phantom units and performance
units.
We
account for the phantom units issued prior to 2009 as liability awards, and the
fair value of these phantom units is remeasured at the end of each reporting
period based on the current market price of our common units until
settlement. Prior to settlement, compensation cost is recognized for
these phantom units based on the proportionate amount of the requisite service
period that has been rendered to date. We account for the phantom
units issued subsequent to 2008 as equity awards, and we estimate the fair value
of these phantom units using the Black–Scholes option pricing
model. We account for the performance units as equity awards, and we
estimated the fair value of these performance units using the Monte Carlo
simulation model.
The
following table presents the compensation costs recognized in our unaudited
condensed consolidated statements of operations:
Three Months Ended June 30,
|
Six Months Ended June 30,
|
|||||||||||||||
2010
|
2009
|
2010
|
2009
|
|||||||||||||
Liability
awards
|
$ | 608 | $ | 627 | $ | 1,276 | $ | 1,246 | ||||||||
Equity
awards
|
429 | 54 | 827 | 54 | ||||||||||||
Total
|
$ | 1,037 | $ | 681 | $ | 2,103 | $ | 1,300 |
These
costs are included in “General and administrative expenses” in our unaudited
condensed consolidated statements of operations.
6
EV
Energy Partners, L.P.
Notes
to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(continued)
As of
June 30, 2010, total unrecognized compensation costs related to the unvested
liability awards and equity awards and the period over which they are expected
to be recognized are as follows:
Unrecognized
Compensation
Expense
|
Weighted
Average
Period
(in years)
|
|||||||
Liability
awards
|
$ | 3,913 | 2.2 | |||||
Equity
awards
|
6,477 | 3.5 |
NOTE
3. ACQUISITIONS
On March
30, 2010 followed by a second closing on June 29, 2010, we, along with certain
institutional partnerships managed by EnerVest, acquired oil and natural gas
properties in the Appalachian Basin We acquired a 46.15%
interest in these properties for $145.8 million. This acquisition was
primarily funded with borrowings under our credit facility and cash on
hand.
The
following table reflects pro forma revenues, net income and net income per
limited partner unit as if this acquisition had taken place at the beginning of
the periods presented. These unaudited pro forma amounts do not
purport to be indicative of the results that would have actually been obtained
during the periods presented or that may be obtained in the future.
Three Months Ended June 30,
|
Six Months Ended June 30,
|
|||||||||||||||
2010
|
2009
|
2010
|
2009
|
|||||||||||||
Revenues
|
$ | 41,403 | $ | 32,895 | $ | 88,669 | $ | 68,134 | ||||||||
Net
income (loss)
|
16,483 | (30,990 | ) | 64,947 | 8,524 | |||||||||||
Net
income (loss) per limited partner unit:
|
||||||||||||||||
Basic
|
$ | 0.51 | $ | (1.89 | ) | $ | 2.24 | $ | 0.32 | |||||||
Diluted
|
$ | 0.51 | $ | (1.89 | ) | $ | 2.23 | $ | 0.32 |
On April
29, 2010, we, along with certain institutional partnerships managed by EnerVest,
acquired oil and natural gas properties in the Appalachian Basin. We
acquired a 17.2% interest in these properties for $2.0 million. The
acquisition was primarily funded with cash on hand.
The
recognized fair values of the identifiable assets acquired and liabilities
assumed in connection with these acquisitions are as follows:
Accounts
receivable
|
$ | 136 | ||
Other
current assets
|
2,748 | |||
Oil
and natural gas properties
|
156,440 | |||
Other
property
|
1,036 | |||
Accounts
payable and accrued liabilities
|
(79 | ) | ||
Asset
retirement obligations
|
(12,512 | ) | ||
$ | 147,769 |
NOTE
4. DIVESTITURES
On March
1, 2010, we sold 14 non–core oil and natural gas wells and recorded a loss on
the sale of $0.6 million.
On June
14, 2010, we sold unproved oil and natural gas properties and recorded a gain on
the sale of $4.4 million.
7
EV
Energy Partners, L.P.
Notes
to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(continued)
NOTE
5. RISK MANAGEMENT
Our
business activities expose us to risks associated with changes in the market
price of oil and natural gas. In addition, our floating rate credit
facility exposes us to risks associated with changes in interest
rates As such, future earnings are subject to fluctuation due
to changes in the market price of oil and natural gas and interest
rates. We use derivatives to reduce our risk of changes in the prices
of oil and natural gas and interest rates. Our policies do not permit
the use of derivatives for speculative purposes.
We have
elected not to designate any of our derivatives as hedging
instruments. Accordingly, changes in the fair value of our
derivatives are recorded immediately to net income (loss) as “Unrealized
(losses) gains on mark–to–market derivatives, net” in our unaudited condensed
consolidated statements of operations.
As of
June 30, 2010, we had entered into oil and natural gas commodity contracts with
the following terms:
Period Covered
|
Index
|
Hedged
Volume
|
Weighted
Average
Fixed
Price
|
Weighted
Average
Floor
Price
|
Weighted
Average
Ceiling
Price
|
|||||||||||||
Oil
(MBbls):
|
||||||||||||||||||
Swaps
– 2010
|
WTI
|
429.6 | 87.25 | |||||||||||||||
Swaps
– 2011
|
WTI
|
219.0 | 103.66 | |||||||||||||||
Collar
– 2011
|
WTI
|
401.5 | 110.00 | 166.45 | ||||||||||||||
Swaps
– 2012
|
WTI
|
205.0 | 104.05 | |||||||||||||||
Collar
– 2012
|
WTI
|
366.0 | 110.00 | 170.85 | ||||||||||||||
Swaps
– 2013
|
WTI
|
511.0 | 78.64 | |||||||||||||||
Swap
– January 2014 through July 2014
|
WTI
|
106.0 | 84.60 | |||||||||||||||
Swaps
– January 2014 through August 2014
|
WTI
|
194.4 | 82.28 | |||||||||||||||
Natural
Gas (MmmBtus):
|
||||||||||||||||||
Swaps
– 2010
|
Dominion Appalachia
|
1,228.8 | 8.19 | |||||||||||||||
Swap
– 2011
|
Dominion
Appalachia
|
912.5 | 8.69 | |||||||||||||||
Collar
– 2011
|
Dominion
Appalachia
|
1,095.0 | 9.00 | 12.15 | ||||||||||||||
Collar
– 2012
|
Dominion
Appalachia
|
1,830.0 | 8.95 | 11.45 | ||||||||||||||
Swap
– 2010
|
Appalachia
Columbia
|
55.6 | 5.75 | |||||||||||||||
Swaps
– 2010
|
NYMEX
|
4,305.6 | 7.40 | |||||||||||||||
Collar
– 2010
|
NYMEX
|
276.0 | 7.50 | 10.00 | ||||||||||||||
Swaps
– 2011
|
NYMEX
|
7,555.5 | 7.63 | |||||||||||||||
Collar
– 2011
|
NYMEX
|
440.6 | 5.85 | 7.55 | ||||||||||||||
Swaps
– 2012
|
NYMEX
|
7,503.0 | 7.95 | |||||||||||||||
Swaps
– 2013
|
NYMEX
|
3,285.0 | 7.23 | |||||||||||||||
Swaps
– January 2014 through August 2014
|
NYMEX
|
1,215.0 | 7.06 | |||||||||||||||
Swap
– 2010
|
MICHCON_NB
|
920.0 | 8.34 | |||||||||||||||
Collar
– 2011
|
MICHCON_NB
|
1,642.5 | 8.70 | 11.85 | ||||||||||||||
Collar
– 2012
|
MICHCON_NB
|
1,647.0 | 8.75 | 11.05 | ||||||||||||||
Swaps
– 2010
|
HOUSTON
SC
|
278.8 | 5.78 | |||||||||||||||
Collar
– 2010
|
HOUSTON
SC
|
644.0 | 7.25 | 9.55 | ||||||||||||||
Collar
– 2011
|
HOUSTON
SC
|
1,277.5 | 8.25 | 11.65 | ||||||||||||||
Collar
– 2012
|
HOUSTON
SC
|
1,098.0 | 8.25 | 11.10 | ||||||||||||||
Swap
– 2010
|
EL
PASO PERMIAN
|
460.0 | 7.68 | |||||||||||||||
Swap
– 2011
|
EL
PASO PERMIAN
|
912.5 | 9.30 | |||||||||||||||
Swap
– 2012
|
EL
PASO PERMIAN
|
732.0 | 9.21 | |||||||||||||||
Swap
– 2013
|
EL
PASO PERMIAN
|
1,095.0 | 6.77 | |||||||||||||||
Swap
– 2013
|
SAN
JUAN BASIN
|
1,095.0 | 6.66 |
8
EV
Energy Partners, L.P.
Notes
to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(continued)
As of
June 30, 2010, we had entered into natural gas basis swaps with the following
terms:
Period Covered
|
Floating Index 1
|
Floating Index 2
|
Hedged
Volume
(Mmmbtus)
|
Spread
|
||||||
2010
|
NYMEX
|
Panhandle
TX/OK
|
368.0 | (0.30 | ) | |||||
2010
|
NYMEX
|
EL
PASO PERMIAN
|
184.0 | (0.275 | ) | |||||
2010
|
NYMEX
|
SAN
JUAN BASIN
|
828.0 | (0.34 | ) | |||||
2011
|
NYMEX
|
Dominion
Appalachia
|
346.0 | 0.1975 | ||||||
2011
|
NYMEX
|
Appalachia
Columbia
|
94.5 | 0.15 |
As of
June 30, 2010, we had entered into interest rate swaps with the following
terms:
Period Covered
|
Notional
Amount
|
Floating
Rate
|
Fixed
Rate
|
||||||
July
2010 – July 2012
|
$ | 200,000 |
1 Month LIBOR
|
4.163 | % | ||||
July
2010 – September 2012
|
40,000 |
1
Month LIBOR
|
2.145 | % |
The fair
value of these derivatives was as follows:
Asset Derivatives
|
Liability Derivatives
|
|||||||||||||||
June 30,
2010
|
December 31,
2009
|
June 30,
2010
|
December 31,
2009
|
|||||||||||||
Oil
and natural gas commodity contracts
|
$ | 138,402 | $ | 111,541 | $ | 574 | $ | 6,413 | ||||||||
Interest
rate swaps
|
– | – | 14,264 | 12,065 | ||||||||||||
Total
fair value
|
138,402 | 111,541 | 14,838 | 18,478 | ||||||||||||
Netting
arrangements
|
(14,123 | ) | (16,259 | ) | (14,123 | ) | (16,259 | ) | ||||||||
Net
recorded fair value
|
$ | 124,279 | $ | 95,282 | $ | 715 | $ | 2,219 | ||||||||
Location
of derivatives in our condensed consolidated balance
sheets:
|
||||||||||||||||
Derivative
asset
|
$ | 48,009 | $ | 26,733 | $ | – | $ | – | ||||||||
Long–term
derivative asset
|
76,270 | 68,549 | – | – | ||||||||||||
Derivative
liability
|
– | – | 715 | 1,543 | ||||||||||||
Long–term
derivative liability
|
– | – | – | 676 | ||||||||||||
$ | 124,279 | $ | 95,282 | $ | 715 | $ | 2,219 |
The
following table presents the impact of derivatives and their location within the
unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations:
Three Months Ended June 30,
|
Six Months Ended June 30,
|
|||||||||||||||
2010
|
2009
|
2010
|
2009
|
|||||||||||||
Realized
gains on mark–to– market derivatives, net:
|
||||||||||||||||
Oil
and natural gas commodity contracts
|
$ | 16,044 | $ | 21,162 | $ | 26,167 | $ | 40,734 | ||||||||
Interest
rate swaps
|
(2,143 | ) | (2,125 | ) | (4,301 | ) | (3,974 | ) | ||||||||
Total
|
$ | 13,901 | $ | 19,037 | $ | 21,866 | $ | 36,760 | ||||||||
Unrealized
(losses) gains on mark– to–market derivatives, net:
|
||||||||||||||||
Oil
and natural gas commodity contracts
|
$ | (1,189 | ) | $ | (48,986 | ) | $ | 32,701 | $ | (22,216 | ) | |||||
Interest
rate swaps
|
(969 | ) | 4,486 | (2,199 | ) | 4,384 | ||||||||||
Total
|
$ | (2,158 | ) | $ | (44,500 | ) | $ | 30,502 | $ | (17,832 | ) |
9
EV
Energy Partners, L.P.
Notes
to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(continued)
NOTE
6. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
The
following table presents the fair value hierarchy table for our assets and
liabilities that are required to be measured at fair value on a recurring
basis:
Fair Value at Reporting Date Using:
|
||||||||||||||||
June 30,
2010
|
Quoted Prices
in Active
Markets for
Identical
Assets
(Level 1)
|
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
|
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
|
|||||||||||||
Derivative
assets:
|
||||||||||||||||
Oil
and natural gas commodity contracts
|
$ | 138,402 | $ | – | $ | 138,402 | $ | – | ||||||||
Derivative
liabilities:
|
||||||||||||||||
Oil
and natural gas commodity contracts
|
$ | 574 | $ | – | $ | 574 | $ | – | ||||||||
Interest
rate swaps
|
14,264 | – | 14,264 | – | ||||||||||||
Total
derivative liabilities
|
$ | 14,838 | $ | – | $ | 14,838 | $ | – | ||||||||
Fair Value at Reporting Date
Using:
|
||||||||||||||||
December 31,
2009 |
Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical
Assets
(Level 1)
|
Significant Other Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
|
Significant Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
|
|||||||||||||
Derivative
assets:
|
||||||||||||||||
Oil
and natural gas commodity contracts
|
$ | 111,541 | $ | – | $ | 111,541 | $ | – | ||||||||
Derivative
liabilities:
|
||||||||||||||||
Oil
and natural gas commodity contracts
|
$ | 6,413 | $ | – | $ | 6,413 | $ | – | ||||||||
Interest
rate swaps
|
12,065 | – | 12,065 | – | ||||||||||||
Total
derivative liabilities
|
$ | 18,478 | $ | – | $ | 18,478 | $ | – |
Our
derivatives consist of over–the–counter (“OTC”) contracts which are not traded
on a public exchange. These derivatives are indexed to active
trading hubs for the underlying commodity, and are OTC contracts commonly used
in the energy industry and offered by a number of financial institutions and
large energy companies.
As the
fair value of these derivatives is based on inputs using market prices obtained
from independent brokers or determined using quantitative models that use as
their basis readily observable market parameters that are actively quoted and
can be validated through external sources, including third party pricing
services, brokers and market transactions, we have categorized these derivatives
as Level 2. We value these derivatives based on observable market
data for similar instruments. This observable data includes the
forward curve for commodity prices based on quoted market prices and prospective
volatility factors related to changes in the forward curves and yield curves
based on money market rates and interest rate swap data. Our
estimates of fair value have been determined at discrete points in time based on
relevant market data. These estimates involve uncertainty and cannot
be determined with precision. There were no changes in valuation
techniques or related inputs in the six months ended June 30,
2010.
10
EV
Energy Partners, L.P.
Notes
to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(continued)
NOTE
7. ASSET RETIREMENT OBLIGATIONS
We record
an asset retirement obligation (“ARO”) and capitalize the asset retirement cost
in oil and natural gas properties in the period in which the retirement
obligation is incurred based upon the fair value of an obligation to perform
site reclamation, dismantle facilities or plug and abandon
wells. After recording these amounts, the ARO is accreted to its
future estimated value using an assumed cost of funds and the additional
capitalized costs are depreciated on a unit–of–production basis. The
changes in the aggregate ARO are as follows:
Balance
as of December 31, 2009
|
$ | 43,688 | ||
Liabilities
incurred or assumed in acquisitions
|
12,512 | |||
Sale
of oil and natural gas properties
|
(292 | ) | ||
Accretion
expense
|
1,274 | |||
Revisions
in estimated cash flows
|
(1,028 | ) | ||
Payments
to settle liabilities
|
(119 | ) | ||
Balance
as of June 30, 2010
|
$ | 56,035 |
As of
June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, $1.1 million and $1.2 million,
respectively, of our ARO is classified as current and is included in “Accounts
payable and accrued liabilities” in our unaudited condensed consolidated balance
sheet.
NOTE
8. LONG–TERM DEBT
As of
June 30, 2010, our credit facility consists of a $700.0 million senior secured
revolving credit facility that expires in October 2012. Borrowings
under the facility are secured by a first priority lien on substantially all of
our assets and the assets of our subsidiaries. We may use borrowings
under the facility for acquiring and developing oil and natural gas properties,
for working capital purposes, for general corporate purposes and for funding
distributions to partners. We also may use up to $50.0 million of
available borrowing capacity for letters of credit. The facility
requires the maintenance of a current ratio (as defined in the facility) of
greater than 1.0 and a ratio of total debt to earnings plus interest expense,
taxes, depreciation, depletion and amortization expense and exploration expense
of no greater than 4.0 to 1.0. As of June 30, 2010, we were in
compliance with these financial covenants.
Borrowings
under the facility bear interest at a floating rate based on, at our election, a
base rate or the London Inter–Bank Offered Rate plus applicable premiums based
on the percent of the borrowing base that we have outstanding (weighted average
effective interest rate of 3.59% at June 30, 2010).
Borrowings
under the facility may not exceed a “borrowing base” determined by the lenders
under the facility based on our oil and natural gas reserves. As of
June 30, 2010, the borrowing base under the facility was $465.0
million. The borrowing base is subject to scheduled redeterminations
as of April 1 and October 1 of each year with an additional redetermination once
per calendar year at our request or at the request of the lenders and with one
calculation that may be made at our request during each calendar year in
connection with material acquisitions or divestitures of
properties.
We had
$345.0 million and $302.0 million outstanding under the facility at June 30,
2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively.
NOTE
9. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
We are
involved in disputes or legal actions arising in the ordinary course of
business. We do not believe the outcome of such disputes or legal
actions will have a material adverse effect on our unaudited condensed
consolidated financial statements, and no amounts have been accrued at June 30,
2010 or December 31, 2009.
NOTE
10. OWNERS’ EQUITY
Units
Outstanding
At June
30, 2010, owner’s equity consists of 27,060,313 common units, representing a 98%
limited partnership interest in us, and a 2% general partnership
interest.
11
EV
Energy Partners, L.P.
Notes
to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(continued)
Issuance
of Units
In
January 2010, 108,971 phantom units vested at a fair value of $3.3
million. Of these vested units, 84,842 were converted to common units
at a fair value of $2.6 million and 24,129 were settled in cash at a fair value
of $0.7 million. In addition, 50,000 performance units vested and
were converted to common units.
On
February 12, 2010, we closed a public offering of 3.45 million of our common
units at an offering price of $28.08 per common unit. We received net
proceeds of $94.6 million, including a contribution of $2.0 million by our
general partner to maintain its 2% interest in us. We used these net
proceeds to repay indebtedness outstanding under our credit
facility.
Cash
Distributions
The
following sets forth the distributions we paid during the six months ended June
30, 2010:
Date Paid
|
Period Covered
|
Distribution
per Unit
|
Total
Distribution
|
|||||||
February
12, 2010
|
October
1, 2009 – December 31, 2009
|
$ | 0.755 | $ | 20,221 | |||||
May
14, 2010
|
January
1, 2010 – March 31, 2010
|
0.756 | 23,212 | |||||||
$ | 43,433 |
On July
27, 2010, the board of directors of EV Management declared a $0.757 per unit
distribution for the second quarter of 2010 on all common units. The
distribution of approximately $23.2 million is to be paid on August 13, 2010 to
unitholders of record at the close of business on August 6, 2010.
NOTE
11. NET INCOME (LOSS) PER LIMITED PARTNER UNIT
The
following sets forth the calculation of net income (loss) per limited
partner unit:
Three Months Ended June 30,
|
Six Months Ended June 30,
|
|||||||||||||||
2010
|
2009
|
2010
|
2009
|
|||||||||||||
Net
income (loss)
|
$ | 16,280 | $ | (31,630 | ) | $ | 62,404 | $ | 6,714 | |||||||
Less:
|
||||||||||||||||
Incentive
distribution rights
|
(2,298 | ) | (1,696 | ) | (4,588 | ) | (3,049 | ) | ||||||||
General
partner’s 2% interest in net (income) loss
|
(326 | ) | 633 | (1,248 | ) | (134 | ) | |||||||||
Limited
partners’ interest in net income (loss)
|
$ | 13,656 | $ | (32,693 | ) | $ | 56,568 | $ | 3,531 | |||||||
Weighted
average limited partner units outstanding:
|
||||||||||||||||
Common
units
|
27,060 | 13,794 | 26,249 | 13,456 | ||||||||||||
Subordinated
units
|
– | 3,100 | – | 3,100 | ||||||||||||
Performance
units (1)
|
150 | 32 | 154 | 16 | ||||||||||||
Denominator
for basic net income (loss) per limited partner unit
|
27,210 | 16,926 | 26,403 | 16,572 | ||||||||||||
Dilutive
phantom units
|
54 | – | 35 | – | ||||||||||||
Total
|
27,264 | 16,926 | 26,438 | 16,572 | ||||||||||||
Net
income (loss) per limited partner unit:
|
||||||||||||||||
Basic
|
$ | 0.50 | $ | (1.93 | ) | $ | 2.14 | $ | 0.21 | |||||||
Diluted
|
$ | 0.50 | $ | (1.93 | ) | $ | 2.14 | $ | 0.21 |
(1)
|
Our
earned but unvested performance units are considered to be participating
securities for purposes of calculating our net income (loss) per limited
partner unit,
and, accordingly, are included in the basic computation as
such.
|
12
EV
Energy Partners, L.P.
Notes
to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(continued)
NOTE
12. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Pursuant
to an omnibus agreement, we paid EnerVest $2.3 million and $1.9 million in the
three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively, and $4.3 million and
$3.8 million in the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively, in
monthly administrative fees for providing us general and administrative
services. These fees are based on an allocation of charges between
EnerVest and us based on the estimated use of such services by each party, and
we believe that the allocation method employed by EnerVest is reasonable and
reflective of the estimated level of costs we would have incurred on a
standalone basis. These fees are included in “General and
administrative expenses” in our unaudited condensed consolidated statements of
operations.
We have
entered into operating agreements with EnerVest whereby a wholly owned
subsidiary of EnerVest acts as contract operator of the oil and natural gas
wells and related gathering systems and production facilities in which we own an
interest. We reimbursed EnerVest $3.2 million and $2.4 million in the
three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively, and $5.7 million and
$5.0 million in the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively, for
direct expenses incurred in the operation of our wells and related gathering
systems and production facilities and for the allocable share of the costs of
EnerVest employees who performed services on our properties. As the
vast majority of such expenses are charged to us on an actual basis (i.e., no
mark–up or subsidy is charged or received by EnerVest), we believe that the
aforementioned services were provided to us at fair and reasonable rates
relative to the prevailing market and are representative of what the amounts
would have been on a standalone basis. These costs are included in
“Lease operating expenses” in our unaudited condensed consolidated statements of
operations. Additionally, in its role as contract operator,
this EnerVest subsidiary also collects proceeds from oil and natural
gas sales and distributes them to us, other working interest owners and royalty
owners.
NOTE 13. OTHER SUPPLEMENTAL
INFORMATION
Supplemental
cash flows and non–cash transactions were as follows:
Six Months Ended June 30,
|
||||||||
2010
|
2009
|
|||||||
Supplemental
cash flows information:
|
||||||||
Cash
paid for interest
|
$ | 4,755 | $ | 6,714 | ||||
Cash
paid for income taxes
|
245 | 114 | ||||||
Non–cash
transactions:
|
||||||||
Costs
for development of oil and natural gas properties in accounts payable and
accrued liabilities
|
2,533 | 687 |
NOTE 14. NEW ACCOUNTING
STANDARDS
In April
2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010–14, Accounting for Extractive Activities
– Oil & Gas: Amendments to Paragraph 932–10–S99–1, to amend paragraph
932–10–S99–1 due to SEC Release No. 33-8995 [FR 78], Modernization of Oil and Gas
Reporting. No other new accounting pronouncements issued or
effective during the six months ended June 30, 2010 have had or are expected to
have a material impact on our unaudited condensed consolidated financial
statements.
NOTE
15. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
On July
1, 2010, we sold unproved oil and natural gas properties for $41.3
million. We received $20.6 million at the closing and will receive
the remainder of the proceeds, subject to certain conditions, including
purchaser due diligence, on or before November 1, 2010. These
unproved oil and natural gas properties are classified as “Assets held for sale”
in our unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheet.
In July
2010, we repaid $17.0 million of indebtedness outstanding under our credit
facility with proceeds from the sale of unproved oil and natural gas
properties.
We
evaluated subsequent events for appropriate accounting and disclosure through
the date these condensed consolidated financial statements were
issued.
13
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND
ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations should
be read in conjunction with our unaudited condensed consolidated financial
statements and the related notes thereto, as well as our Annual Report on Form
10–K for the year ended December 31, 2009.
OVERVIEW
We are a
Delaware limited partnership formed in April 2006 by EnerVest to acquire,
produce and develop oil and natural gas properties. Our general
partner is EV Energy GP, a Delaware limited partnership, and the general partner
of our general partner is EV Management, a Delaware limited liability
company.
Our
properties are located in the Appalachian Basin (primarily in Ohio and West
Virginia), Michigan, the Monroe Field in Northern Louisiana, Central and East
Texas (which includes the Austin Chalk area), the Permian Basin, the San Juan
Basin and the Mid–Continent areas in Oklahoma, Texas, Kansas and
Louisiana. As of December 31, 2009, we had estimated net proved
reserves of 7.4 MMBbls of oil, 257.2 Bcf of natural gas and 10.7 MMBbls of
natural gas liquids, or 365.6 Bcfe, and a standardized measure of
$351.5 million.
CURRENT
DEVELOPMENTS
In
February 2010, we closed a public offering of 3.45 million common units at an
offering price of $28.08 per common unit. We received net proceeds of
$94.6 million, including a contribution of $2.0 million by our general partner
to maintain its 2% interest in us.
In March
2010 followed by a second closing in June 2010, we, along with certain
institutional partnerships managed by EnerVest, acquired oil and natural gas
properties in the Appalachian Basin. We acquired a 46.15% interest in
these properties for $145.8 million. This acquisition was primarily
funded with borrowings under our credit facility and cash on hand.
In April
2010, we, along with certain institutional partnerships managed by EnerVest,
acquired oil and natural gas properties in the Appalachian Basin. We
acquired a 17.2% interest in these properties for $2.0 million. The
acquisition was primarily funded with cash on hand.
In June
2010, we sold unproved oil and natural gas properties and recorded a gain of
$4.4 million.
In July
2010, we sold unproved oil and natural gas properties for $41.3
million. We received $20.6 million at the closing and will receive
the remainder of the proceeds, subject to certain conditions, including
purchaser due diligence, on or before November 1, 2010.
BUSINESS
ENVIRONMENT
Our
primary business objective is to provide stability and growth in cash
distributions per unit over time. The amount of cash we can
distribute on our units principally depends upon the amount of cash generated
from our operations, which will fluctuate from quarter to quarter based on,
among other things:
|
·
|
the
prices at which we will sell our oil, natural gas liquids and natural gas
production;
|
|
·
|
our
ability to hedge commodity prices;
|
|
·
|
the
amount of oil, natural gas liquids and natural gas we produce;
and
|
|
·
|
the
level of our operating and administrative
costs.
|
Oil and
natural gas prices are expected to be volatile in the future. Factors
affecting the price of oil include worldwide economic conditions, geopolitical
activities, worldwide supply disruptions, weather conditions, actions taken by
the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries and the value of the U.S.
dollar in international currency markets. Factors affecting the price
of natural gas include the discovery of substantial accumulations of natural gas
in unconventional reservoirs due to technological advancements necessary to
commercially produce these unconventional reserves, North American weather
conditions, industrial and consumer demand for natural gas, storage levels of
natural gas and the availability and accessibility of natural gas deposits in
North America.
14
In order
to mitigate the impact of changes in oil and natural gas prices on our cash
flows, we are a party to derivatives, and we intend to enter into derivatives in
the future to reduce the impact of oil and natural gas price volatility on our
cash flows. By removing a significant portion of this price
volatility on our future oil and natural gas production through August 2014, we
have mitigated, but not eliminated, the potential effects of changing oil and
natural gas prices on our cash flows from operations for those
periods. If commodity prices are depressed for an extended period of
time, it could alter our acquisition and development plans, and adversely affect
our growth strategy and ability to access additional capital in the capital
markets.
The
primary factors affecting our production levels are capital availability, our
ability to make accretive acquisitions, the success of our drilling program and
our inventory of drilling prospects. In addition, we face the
challenge of natural production declines. As initial reservoir
pressures are depleted, production from a given well decreases. We
attempt to overcome this natural decline through a combination of drilling and
acquisitions. Our future growth will depend on our ability to
continue to add reserves through drilling and acquisitions in excess of
production. We will maintain our focus on the costs to add reserves
through drilling and acquisitions as well as the costs necessary to produce such
reserves. Our ability to add reserves through drilling is dependent
on our capital resources and can be limited by many factors, including our
ability to timely obtain drilling permits and regulatory
approvals. Any delays in drilling, completion or connection to
gathering lines of our new wells will negatively impact our production, which
may have an adverse effect on our revenues and, as a result, cash available for
distribution.
We focus
our efforts on increasing oil and natural gas reserves and production while
controlling costs at a level that is appropriate for long–term
operations. Our future cash flows from operations are dependent upon
our ability to manage our overall cost structure.
RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS
Three Months Ended June 30,
|
Six Months Ended June 30,
|
|||||||||||||||
2010
|
2009
|
2010
|
2009
|
|||||||||||||
Production
data:
|
||||||||||||||||
Oil
(MBbls)
|
171 | 127 | 297 | 254 | ||||||||||||
Natural
gas liquids (MBbls)
|
178 | 186 | 360 | 400 | ||||||||||||
Natural
gas (MMcf)
|
4,734 | 4,017 | 8,719 | 7,980 | ||||||||||||
Net
production (MMcfe)
|
6,831 | 5,893 | 12,665 | 11,903 | ||||||||||||
Average
sales price per unit:
|
||||||||||||||||
Oil
(Bbl)
|
$ | 73.20 | $ | 54.16 | $ | 73.73 | $ | 44.15 | ||||||||
Natural
gas liquids (Bbl)
|
40.23 | 27.95 | 42.91 | 25.81 | ||||||||||||
Natural
gas (Mcf)
|
4.16 | 3.26 | 4.66 | 3.71 | ||||||||||||
Mcfe
|
5.77 | 4.27 | 6.16 | 4.30 | ||||||||||||
Average
unit cost per Mcfe:
|
||||||||||||||||
Production
costs:
|
||||||||||||||||
Lease
operating expenses
|
$ | 2.18 | $ | 1.61 | $ | 2.08 | $ | 1.74 | ||||||||
Production
taxes
|
0.24 | 0.21 | 0.30 | 0.22 | ||||||||||||
Total
|
2.42 | 1.82 | 2.38 | 1.96 | ||||||||||||
Asset
retirement obligations accretion expense
|
0.11 | 0.10 | 0.10 | 0.09 | ||||||||||||
Depreciation,
depletion and amortization
|
1.97 | 2.16 | 2.02 | 2.22 | ||||||||||||
General
and administrative expenses
|
0.85 | 0.69 | 0.83 | 0.70 |
Three
Months Ended June 30, 2010 Compared with the Three Months Ended June 30,
2009
Net
income for the three months ended June 30, 2010 was $16.3 million, an increase
of $47.9 million compared with the three months ended June 30,
2009. This increase was primarily the result of $13.9 million of
higher revenues due to increased production and higher prices for oil, natural
gas and natural gas liquids, $42.3 million related to non–cash changes in the
fair value of our derivatives and a $4.4 million gain on the sale of oil and
natural gas properties, partially offset by $5.4 million of increased lease
operating expenses, $5.1 million of lower realized gains on our derivatives and
$1.7 million of increased general and administrative expenses.
15
Oil,
natural gas and natural gas liquids revenues for the three months ended June 30,
2010 totaled $39.4 million, an increase of $14.3 million compared with the three
months ended June 30, 2009. This increase was the result of $8.3
million related to higher prices for oil, natural gas and natural gas liquids
and $5.9 million related to increased production.
Transportation
and marketing–related revenues for the three months ended June 30, 2010
decreased $0.4 million compared with the three months ended June 30, 2009
primarily due to the recognition of deferred revenues of $0.5 million in the
three months ended June 30, 2009 from the production curtailments in the Monroe
Field in 2008.
Lease
operating expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2010 increased $5.4
million compared with the three months ended June 30, 2009 primarily as the
result of $4.9 million of lease operating expenses associated with the oil and
natural gas properties that we acquired in 2009 and 2010 and $0.5 million
related to the oil and natural gas properties that we acquired prior to
2009. Included in the $4.9 million of lease operating expenses
associated with the oil and natural gas properties that we acquired in 2009 and
2010 was $2.3 million ($0.34 per Mcfe) associated with oil in tanks acquired in
the March 2010 acquisition that was sold in the three months ended June 30,
2010. Lease operating expenses per Mcfe were $2.18 in the three
months ended June 30, 2010 compared with $1.61 in the three months ended June
30, 2009.
Production
taxes for the three months ended June 30, 2010 increased $0.5 million
compared with the three months ended June 30, 2009 primarily due to increased
oil, natural gas and natural gas liquids revenues. Production taxes
for the three months ended June 30, 2010 were $0.24 per Mcfe compared with $0.21
per Mcfe for the three months ended June 30, 2009.
Asset
retirement obligations accretion expense for the three months ended June 30,
2010 increased $0.2 million compared with the three months ended June 30, 2009
primarily due to the oil and natural gas properties that we acquired in 2009 and
2010. Asset retirement obligations accretion expense for the three
months ended June 30, 2010 was $0.11 per Mcfe compared with $0.10 per Mcfe for
the three months ended June 30, 2009.
Depreciation,
depletion and amortization for the three months ended June 30,
2010 increased $0.7 million compared with the three months ended June 30,
2009 primarily due to an increase of $2.9 million related to the oil and natural
gas properties that we acquired in 2009 and 2010 offset by a decrease of
$2.2 million related to the oil and natural gas properties that we acquired
prior to 2009. The decrease in depreciation, depletion and
amortization for the oil and natural gas properties that we acquired prior to
2009 reflects a lower depreciation, depletion and amortization rate for the
three months ended June 30, 2010 compared with the three months ended June 30,
2009 due to increased reserves at June 30, 2010 compared with June 30,
2009. Depreciation, depletion and amortization for the three months
ended June 30, 2010 was $1.97 per Mcfe compared with $2.16 per Mcfe for the
three months ended June 30, 2009.
General
and administrative expenses include the costs of administrative employees and
related benefits, management fees paid to EnerVest, professional fees and other
costs not directly associated with field operations. General and
administrative expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2010 totaled $5.8
million, an increase of $1.7 million compared with the three months ended June
30, 2009. This increase is primarily the result of (i) $0.6 million
of higher compensation costs related to our equity–based compensation, (ii) $0.6
million of costs incurred in conjunction with the integration of the
acquisitions of oil and natural gas properties in 2010 and (iii) $0.4 million of
higher fees paid to EnerVest under the omnibus agreement due to our acquisitions
of oil and natural gas properties in 2009 and 2010. General and
administrative expenses were $0.85 per Mcfe in the three months ended June 30,
2010 compared with $0.69 per Mcfe in the three months ended June 30,
2009.
Realized
gains on mark–to–market derivatives, net represent the monthly cash settlements
with our counterparties related to derivatives that matured during the
period. During the three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, we
received cash payments of $13.9 million and $19.0 million, respectively, from
our counterparties as the contract prices for our derivatives exceeded the
underlying market price for that period.
Unrealized
losses (gains) on mark–to–market derivatives, net represent the change in the
fair value of our open derivatives during the period. In the three
months ended June 30, 2010, the fair value of our open derivatives decreased
from a net asset of $125.8 million at March 31, 2010 to a net asset of $123.6
million at June 30, 2010. In the three months ended June 30, 2009,
the fair value of our open derivatives decreased from a net asset of $171.4
million at March 31, 2009 to a net asset of $126.9 million at June 30,
2009.
16
Interest
expense for the three months ended June 30, 2010 decreased $0.7 million
compared with the three months ended June 30, 2009 primarily due to a decrease
of $0.8 million from the lower weighted average borrowings outstanding
under our credit facility offset by an increase of $0.1 million due to a higher
weighted average effective interest rate in the three months ended June 30, 2010
compared with the three months ended June 30, 2009.
Six
Months Ended June 30, 2010 Compared with the Six Months Ended June 30,
2009
Net
income for the six months ended June 30, 2010 was $62.4 million, an
increase of $55.7 million compared with the six months ended June 30,
2009. This increase was primarily the result of $24.9 million of
higher revenues due to increased production and higher prices for oil, natural
gas and natural gas liquids, $48.3 million related to non–cash changes in the
fair value of our derivatives and a $3.8 million gain on the sale of oil and
natural gas properties, partially offset by $14.8 million of lower realized
gains on our derivatives, $5.6 million of increased lease operating expenses and
$2.2 million of increased general and administrative expenses.
Oil,
natural gas and natural gas liquids revenues for the six months ended June 30,
2010 totaled $78.0 million, an increase of $26.9 million compared with the six
months ended June 30, 2009. This increase was primarily the result of
$21.9 million related to higher prices for oil, natural gas liquids and natural
gas and $5.0 million related to increased production.
Transportation
and marketing–related revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2010 decreased
$2.0 million compared with the six months ended June 30, 2009 primarily due to
the recognition of deferred revenues of $1.8 million in the six months ended
June 30, 2009 from the production curtailments in the Monroe Field in
2008.
Lease
operating expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2010 increased $5.6 million
compared with the six months ended June 30, 2009 primarily as the result of $5.9
million of lease operating expenses associated with the oil and natural gas
properties that we acquired in 2009 and 2010 offset by a decrease of $0.3
million related to the oil and natural gas properties that we acquired prior to
2009. Included in the $5.9 million of lease operating expenses
associated with the oil and natural gas properties that we acquired in 2009 and
2010 was $2.3 million ($0.18 per Mcfe) associated with oil in tanks acquired in
the March 2010 acquisition that was sold in the six months ended June 30,
2010. Lease operating expenses per Mcfe were $2.08 in the six months
ended June 30, 2010 compared with $1.74 in the six months ended June 30,
2009.
Production
taxes for the six months ended June 30, 2010 increased $1.2 million
compared with the six months ended June 30, 2009 primarily due to increased
oil, natural gas and natural gas liquids revenues. Production taxes
for the six months ended June 30, 2010 were $0.30 per Mcfe compared with $0.22
per Mcfe for the six months ended June 30, 2009.
Asset
retirement obligations accretion expense for the six months ended June 30, 2010
increased $0.3 million compared with the six months ended June 30, 2009
primarily due to the oil and natural gas properties that we acquired in 2009 and
2010. Asset retirement obligations accretion expense for the six
months ended June 30, 2010 was $0.10 per Mcfe compared with $0.09 per Mcfe for
the six months ended June 30, 2009.
Depreciation,
depletion and amortization for the six months ended June 30, 2010 decreased
$0.9 million compared with the six months ended June 30, 2009 primarily due to
an increase of $4.0 million related to the oil and natural gas properties that
we acquired in 2009 and 2010 offset by a decrease of $4.9 million related
to the oil and natural gas properties that we acquired prior to
2009. The decrease in depreciation, depletion and amortization for
the oil and natural gas properties that we acquired prior to 2009 reflects a
lower depreciation, depletion and amortization rate for the six months ended
June 30, 2010 compared with the six months ended June 30, 2009 due to increased
reserves at June 30, 2010 compared with June 30, 2009. Depreciation,
depletion and amortization for the six months ended June 30, 2010 was $2.02 per
Mcfe compared with $2.22 per Mcfe for the six months ended June 30,
2009.
General
and administrative expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2010 totaled $10.5
million, an increase of $2.2 million compared with the six months ended June 30,
2009. This increase is primarily the result of (i) $1.0 million of
higher compensation costs related to our equity–based compensation, (ii) $0.7
million of costs incurred in conjunction with the integration of the
acquisitions of oil and natural gas properties in 2010 and (iii) $0.5 million of
higher fees paid to EnerVest under the omnibus agreement due to our acquisitions
of oil and natural gas properties in 2009 and 2010. General and
administrative expenses were $0.83 per Mcfe in the six months ended June 30,
2010 compared with $0.70 per Mcfe in the six months ended June 30,
2009.
17
Realized
gains represent the monthly cash settlements with our counterparties related to
derivatives that matured during the period. During the six months
ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, we received cash payments of $21.9 million and
$36.8 million, respectively, from our counterparties as the contract prices for
our derivatives exceeded the underlying market price for that
period.
Unrealized
losses (gains) on mark–to–market derivatives, net represent the change in the
fair value of our open derivatives during the period. In the six
months ended June 30, 2010, the fair value of our open derivatives increased
from a net asset of $93.1 million at December 31, 2009 to a net asset of $123.6
million at June 30, 2010. In the six months ended June 30, 2009, the
fair value of our open derivatives decreased from a net asset of $144.7
million at December 31, 2008 to a net asset of $126.9 million at June 30,
2009.
Interest
expense for the six months ended June 30, 2010 decreased $1.5 million compared
with the six months ended June 30, 2009 primarily due to a decrease of $2.5
million from the lower weighted average borrowings outstanding under our
credit facility offset by an increase of $1.0 million due to a higher weighted
average effective interest rate in the six months ended June 30, 2010 compared
with the six months ended June 30, 2009.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL
RESOURCES
Historically,
our primary sources of liquidity and capital have been issuances of equity
securities, borrowings under our credit facility and cash flows from operations,
and our primary uses of cash have been acquisitions of oil and natural gas
properties and related assets, development of our oil and natural gas
properties, distributions to our partners and working capital
needs. For 2010, we believe that cash on hand and net cash flows
generated from operations will be adequate to fund our capital budget and
satisfy our short–term liquidity needs. We may also utilize various
financing sources available to us, including the issuance of equity or debt
securities through public offerings or private placements, to fund our
acquisitions and long–term liquidity needs. Our ability to complete
future offerings of equity or debt securities and the timing of these offerings
will depend upon various factors including prevailing market conditions and our
financial condition.
In the
past we accessed the equity markets to finance our significant
acquisitions. While we have been successful in accessing the public
equity markets in 2010, any disruptions in the financial markets may limit our
ability to access the public equity or debt markets in the future.
Available
Credit Facility
We have a
$700.0 million facility that expires in October 2012. Borrowings
under the facility are secured by a first priority lien on substantially all of
our assets and the assets of our subsidiaries. We may use borrowings
under the facility for acquiring and developing oil and natural gas properties,
for working capital purposes, for general corporate purposes and for funding
distributions to partners. We also may use up to $50.0 million of
available borrowing capacity for letters of credit. The facility
requires the maintenance of a current ratio (as defined in the facility) of
greater than 1.0 and a ratio of total debt to earnings plus interest expense,
taxes, depreciation, depletion and amortization expense and exploration expense
of no greater than 4.0 to 1.0. As of June 30, 2010, we were in
compliance with all of the facility’s financial covenants.
Borrowings
under the facility may not exceed a “borrowing base” determined by the lenders
based on our oil and natural gas reserves. As of June 30, 2010, the
borrowing base was $465.0 million. The borrowing base is subject to
scheduled redeterminations as of April 1 and October 1 of each year with an
additional redetermination once per calendar year at our request or at the
request of the lenders and with one calculation that may be made at our request
during each calendar year in connection with material acquisitions or
divestitures of properties. The borrowing base is determined by each
lender based on the value of our proved oil and natural gas reserves using
assumptions regarding future prices, costs and other matters that may vary by
lender.
Borrowings
under the facility will bear interest at a floating rate based on, at our
election, a base rate or the London Inter–Bank Offered Rate plus applicable
premiums based on the percent of the borrowing base that we have
outstanding.
At June
30, 2010, we had $345.0 million outstanding under the facility.
18
Cash
and Short–term Investments
At June
30, 2010, we had $17.3 million of cash and short–term investments, which
included $10.1 million of short–term investments. With regard to our
short–term investments, we invest in money market accounts with a major
financial institution.
Counterparty
Exposure
At June
30, 2010, our open commodity derivative contracts were in a net receivable
position with a fair value of $123.6 million. All of our commodity
derivative contracts are with major financial institutions who are also lenders
under our credit facility. Should one of these financial
counterparties not perform, we may not realize the benefit of some of our
derivative instruments under lower commodity prices and we could incur a
loss. As of June 30, 2010, all of our counterparties have performed
pursuant to their commodity derivative contracts.
Cash
Flows
Cash
flows provided (used) by type of activity were as follows:
Six Months Ended June 30,
|
||||||||
2010
|
2009
|
|||||||
Operating
activities
|
$ | 55,802 | $ | 55,192 | ||||
Investing
activities
|
(151,468 | ) | (10,201 | ) | ||||
Financing
activities
|
94,152 | (62,579 | ) |
Operating
Activities
Cash
flows from operating activities were $55.8 million and $55.2 million in the six
months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The increase was
primarily due to higher production and prices for oil, natural gas and natural
gas liquids, partially offset by lower realized gains on derivatives and higher
operating expenses.
Investing
Activities
Our
principal recurring investing activity is the acquisition and development of oil
and natural gas properties. During the six months ended June 30,
2010, we spent $147.8 million on the acquisitions of oil and natural gas
properties and $8.2 million for the development of our oil and natural gas
properties. During the six months ended June 30, 2009, we spent $9.0
million for the development of our oil and natural gas properties and $1.2
million for a deposit on our acquisition of oil and natural gas properties in
July 2009.
Financing
Activities
During
the six months ended June 30, 2010, we received net proceeds of $92.6 million
from our public equity offering in February 2010, and we received contributions
of $2.0 million from our general partner in order to maintain its 2% interest in
us. We borrowed $138.0 million under our credit facility to finance
our acquisition of oil and natural gas properties in March 2010 and we repaid
$95.0 million of borrowings outstanding under our credit facility with proceeds
from our public equity offering and cash flows from operations. In
addition, we paid distributions of $43.4 million to holders of our common units
and our general partner.
During
the six months ended June 30, 2009, we received net proceeds of $78.4 million
from our public equity offering in June 2009 and $1.6 million from our general
partner to maintain its 2% interest in us. We repaid $115.0 million
of borrowings outstanding under our credit facility, and we paid $27.7 million
of distributions to our general partner and holders of our common and
subordinated units.
FORWARD–LOOKING
STATEMENTS
19
All of
our forward–looking information is subject to risks and uncertainties that could
cause actual results to differ materially from the results
expected. Although it is not possible to identify all factors, these
risks and uncertainties include the risk factors and the timing of any of those
risk factors identified in the “Risk Factors” section included in our Annual
Report on Form 10–K for the year ended December 31, 2009. This
document is available through our web site or through the SEC’s Electronic Data
Gathering and Analysis Retrieval System at http://www.sec.gov.
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE
DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
We are
exposed to certain market risks that are inherent in our financial statements
that arise in the normal course of business. We may enter into
derivative instruments to manage or reduce market risk, but do not enter into
derivative agreements for speculative purposes.
We do not
designate these or future derivative instruments as hedges for accounting
purposes. Accordingly, the changes in the fair value of these
instruments are recognized currently in earnings.
Commodity
Price Risk
Our major
market risk exposure is to prices for oil, natural gas and natural gas
liquids. These prices have historically been volatile. As
such, future earnings are subject to change due to changes in these
prices. Realized prices are primarily driven by the prevailing
worldwide price for oil and regional spot prices for natural gas
production. We have used, and expect to continue to use, oil and
natural gas commodity contracts to reduce our risk of changes in the prices of
oil and natural gas. Pursuant to our risk management policy, we
engage in these activities as a hedging mechanism against price volatility
associated with pre–existing or anticipated sales of oil and natural
gas.
We have
entered into oil and natural gas commodity contracts to hedge significant
amounts of our anticipated oil and natural gas production through August
2014. The amounts hedged represent, on an Mcfe basis, approximately
55% of the production attributable to our estimated net proved reserves from
July 2010 through August 2014, as estimated in our reserve report prepared by
third party engineers using prices, costs and other assumptions required by SEC
rules. Our actual production will vary from the amounts estimated in
our reserve reports, perhaps materially.
The fair
value of our oil and natural gas commodity contracts and basis swaps at June 30,
2010 was a net asset of $109.3 million. A 10% change in oil and
natural gas prices with all other factors held constant would result in a change
in the fair value (generally correlated to our estimated future net cash flows
from such instruments) of our oil and natural gas commodity contracts and basis
swaps of approximately $24.2 million. Please see “Item 1. Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)” contained herein for additional
information.
Interest
Rate Risk
Our
floating rate credit facility also exposes us to risks associated with changes
in interest rates and as such, future earnings are subject to change due to
changes in these interest rates. The fair value of our interest rate
swaps at June 30, 2010 was a net liability of $14.3 million. If
interest rates on our facility increased by 1%, interest expense for the six
months ended June 30, 2010 would have increased by approximately $1.5
million. Please see “Item 1. Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements (unaudited)” contained herein for additional
information.
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND
PROCEDURES
In
accordance with Exchange Act Rule 13a–15 and 15d–15, we carried out an
evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of management,
including our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, of the
effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the
period covered by this report. Based on that evaluation, our Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure
controls and procedures were effective as of June 30, 2010 to provide reasonable
assurance that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed or
submitted under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported
within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. Our
disclosure controls and procedures include controls and procedures designed to
ensure that information required to be disclosed in reports filed or submitted
under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our management,
including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as
appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required
disclosure.
20
Change
in Internal Controls Over Financial Reporting
There
have not been any changes in our internal controls over financial reporting that
occurred during the quarterly period ended June 30, 2010 that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controls
over financial reporting.
PART II. OTHER
INFORMATION
We are
involved in disputes or legal actions arising in the ordinary course of
business. We do not believe the outcome of such disputes or legal
actions will have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial
statements.
There
have been no material changes with respect to the risk factors disclosed in our
Annual Report on Form 10–K for the year ended December 31, 2009 and our
Quarterly Report on Form 10–Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 except for
the update described below:
The adoption of
derivatives legislation and regulations related to derivative contracts could
have an adverse impact on our ability to hedge risks associated with our
business.
The
President has recently signed into law the Dodd–Frank Wall Street Reform and
Consumer Protection Act (the “Act”). Among other things, the Act
requires the Commodity Futures Trading Commission and the SEC to enact
regulations affecting derivative contracts, including the derivative contracts
we use to hedge our exposure to price volatility. We cannot predict
the content of these regulations or the effect that these regulations will have
on our hedging activities. Of particular concern, the Act does not
explicitly exempt end users (such as us) from the requirements to post margin in
connection with hedging activities. While several senators have
indicated that it was not the intent of the Act to require margin from end
users, the exemption is not in the act. If the regulations ultimately
adopted were to require that we post margin for our hedging activities, our
hedging would become more expensive and we may decide to alter our hedging
strategy. It is also possible that regulations, when finally adopted,
may make our hedging activities more expensive or cause us to alter our hedging
strategy.
ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR
SECURITIES
None.
ITEM 5. OTHER
INFORMATION
None.
21
ITEM
6. EXHIBITS
The
exhibits listed below are filed or furnished as part of this
report:
10.1
|
Fourth
Amendment dated April 26, 2010 to Amended and Restated Credit Agreement
(Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.1 to EV Energy Partners L.P.’s
current report on Form 8–K filed with the SEC on April 30,
2010).
|
|
+31.1
|
Rule
13a-14(a)/15d–14(a) Certification of Chief Executive
Officer.
|
|
+31.2
|
Rule
13a-14(a)/15d–14(a) Certification of Chief Financial
Officer.
|
|
+32
.1
|
Section
1350 Certification of Chief Executive Officer
|
|
+32.2
|
|
Section
1350 Certification of Chief Financial
Officer
|
+
|
Filed
herewith
|
22
SIGNATURES
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto
duly authorized.
EV
Energy Partners, L.P.
|
||
(Registrant)
|
||
Date: August
9, 2010
|
By:
|
/s/ MICHAEL E. MERCER
|
Michael
E. Mercer
|
||
Senior
Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer
|
23
EXHIBIT
INDEX
10.1
|
Fourth
Amendment dated April 26, 2010 to Amended and Restated Credit Agreement
(Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.1 to EV Energy Partners L.P.’s
current report on Form 8–K filed with the SEC on April 30,
2010).
|
|
+31.1
|
Rule
13a-14(a)/15d–14(a) Certification of Chief Executive
Officer.
|
|
+31.2
|
Rule
13a-14(a)/15d–14(a) Certification of Chief Financial
Officer.
|
|
+32
.1
|
Section
1350 Certification of Chief Executive Officer
|
|
+32.2
|
|
Section
1350 Certification of Chief Financial
Officer
|
+ Filed
herewith
24