Healthcare Integrated Technologies Inc. - Annual Report: 2016 (Form 10-K)

PART I

ITEM 1. BUSINESS.

As used in this Annual Report, “we,” “us,” “our,” “Grasshopper,”” “Company,” or “our Company” refers to Grasshopper Staffing, Inc.

CORPORATE BACKGROUND

Grasshopper Staffing Inc (the “Company”), formally Tomichi Creek Outfitters, was incorporated in the state of Nevada on June 25, 2013.  Our plan of operation is to provide our clients with a once in a lifetime experience to harvest a big game animal or to enjoy a guided scenic tour on the western slopes of the Rocky Mountains.  Our operations are located in Sargents, Colorado, which is approximately four hours southwest of Denver. We are nestled just west of the continental divide surrounded by 12,000 to 14,000-foot mountain peaks.  This territory is remote, yet accessible, and rich with diverse wildlife which is adjacent to the 1.86 million acre Rio Grande National Forest.  The Company has access to over 500,000 acres of private land which is located adjacent to approximately 42 square miles of public land.

On March 2, 2015, the Company entered into a Business Acquisition Agreement and share exchange under which we acquired the business and assets of Grasshopper Staffing Inc. (“Grasshopper Colorado”), formed in the state of Colorado on January 13, 2015. The exchange for $10,651 was represented by 250,000 shares of the Company’s common stock in exchange for all of the outstanding shares of Grasshopper Colorado. The assets purchased include the trademark and website, office supplies and office furniture.  Grasshopper Colorado is operating as a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company and is now the primary operation of our business.

4

Grasshopper Colorado was founded as a solution to the staffing needs presented in the blossoming cannabis industry in Colorado. Grasshopper Colorado is an agency that serves the Colorado's cannabis employment needs by providing employee recruiting, training, securing proper credentials and ensuring compliance with the ever-changing local and state laws. Grasshopper Colorado specializes in providing budtenders, trimmers, janitorial, security, payroll, armored transport, edible production, infusion specialists, grow consultants, irrigation, retail sales, IT solutions, web design, and event services.

Grasshopper Staffing was founded in 2015 by Amber Wick, Melanie Osterman, Barbara Ianne, and Cheryl Zanotelli, as a solution to the staffing needs presented in the blossoming cannabis industry in Colorado. Grasshopper Staffing is an agency that serves the Colorado's cannabis employment needs by providing employee recruiting, training, securing proper credentials and ensuring compliance with the ever-changing local and state laws. Grasshopper Staffing specializes in providing budtenders, trimmers, janitorial, security, payroll, armored transport, edible production, infusion specialists, grow consultants, irrigation, retail sales, IT solutions, web design, and event services.

Effective February 27, 2015 Jeremy Gindro resigned as Chief Executive Officer, President, Secretary, Treasurer and Director. Effective February 27, 2015, Amber Wick was appointed to the board of directors. Effective March 2, 2015, Amber Wick was appointed as Chief Executive Officer, Secretary, and Treasurer.  

On May 5, 2015, Amber Wick resigned from all officer and director positions with the Company and the board of directors appointed Melanie Osterman to serve as Chief Executive Officer and President until the next regularly scheduled election of directors and officers.

On November 2, 2015 we filed a Certificate of Amendment to our Articles of Incorporation changing the name of our Company from Tomichi Creek Outfitters to Grasshopper Staffing, Inc., a name which more accurately represents our new business.

Available Information

We electronically file certain documents with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC). We file annual reports on Form 10-K; quarterly reports on Form 10-Q; and current reports on Form 8-K (as appropriate); along with any related amendments and supplements thereto. From time-to-time, we may also file registration statements and related documents in connection with equity or debt offerings. You may read and copy any materials we file with the SEC at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, NE, Washington, DC 20549. You may obtain information regarding the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. In addition, the SEC maintains an internet website at www.sec.gov that contains reports and other information regarding registrants that file electronically with the SEC.

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS.

Risks Related to Our Business

Marijuana remains illegal under federal law

Marijuana is a Schedule I controlled substance and is illegal under federal law. Even in states that have legalized the use of marijuana, its sale and use remain violations of federal law. The illegality of marijuana under federal law preempts state laws that legalize its use. Therefore, strict enforcement of federal law regarding marijuana would likely result in our inability to proceed with our business plan.

Our business is dependent on laws pertaining to the marijuana industry

The United States federal government regulates drugs through the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. § 811), which places controlled substances, including cannabis, in a schedule. Cannabis is classified as a Schedule I drug, which is viewed as highly addictive and having no medical value. The United States Federal Drug Administration has not approved the sale of marijuana for any medical application. Doctors may not prescribe cannabis for medical use under federal law, however they can recommend its use under the First Amendment. In 2010, the United States Veterans Affairs Department clarified that veterans using medicinal cannabis will not be denied services or other medications that are denied to those using illegal drugs.

5

As of July 18, 2017, 29 states, Washington D.C, the District of Columbia and Guam allow their citizens to use medical cannabis through de-criminalization. Voters in the following 8 States, Oregon, Colorado, Washington, Alaska, California, Massachusetts, Maine and Nevada, have legalized cannabis for adult recreational use. In 2017, Indiana, Iowa, Kentucky, Missouri, Nebraska, North Carolina, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Utah and Wisconsin all have legislative bills in various stages of progress concerning cannabis legalization.

These noted state laws, both proposed and enacted, are in conflict with the federal Controlled Substances Act, which makes cannabis use and possession illegal on a national level. However, on August 29, 2013, the U.S. Department of Justice issued a memorandum providing that where states and local governments enact laws authorizing cannabis-related use, and implement strong and effective regulatory and enforcement systems, the federal government will rely upon states and local enforcement agencies to address cannabis activity through the enforcement of their own state and local narcotics laws. The memorandum further stated that the U.S Justice Department’s limited investigative and prosecutorial resources will be focused on eight priorities to prevent unintended consequences of the state laws, including distribution of cannabis to minors, preventing the distribution of cannabis from states where it is legal to states where it is not, and preventing money laundering, violence and drugged driving.

On December 11, 2014, the U.S. Department of Justice issued another memorandum with regard to its position and enforcement protocol with regard to Indian Country, stating that the eight priorities in the previous federal memo would guide the United States Attorneys' cannabis enforcement efforts in Indian Country. On December 16, 2014, as a component of the federal spending bill, the Obama administration enacted regulations that prohibit the Department of Justice from using funds to prosecute state-based legal medical cannabis programs. As of June 28, 2016, in addition to the 23 states and the District of Columbia which had already passed legislation allowing citizens to use cannabis in some form, an additional 13 states had pending legislation or ballot measures to legalize medical cannabis.

These noted state laws, both proposed and enacted, are in conflict with the federal Controlled Substances Act, which makes cannabis use and possession illegal on a national level. However, on August 29, 2013, the U.S. Department of Justice issued a memorandum providing that where states and local governments enact laws authorizing cannabis-related use, and implement strong and effective regulatory and enforcement systems, the federal government will rely upon states and local enforcement agencies to address cannabis activity through the enforcement of their own state and local narcotics laws. The memorandum further stated that the U.S Justice Department’s limited investigative and prosecutorial resources will be focused on eight priorities to prevent unintended consequences of the state laws, including distribution of cannabis to minors, preventing the distribution of cannabis from states where it is legal to states where it is not, and preventing money laundering, violence and drugged driving.

On December 11, 2014, the U.S. Department of Justice issued another memorandum with regard to its position and enforcement protocol with regard to Indian Country, stating that the eight priorities in the previous federal memo would guide the United States Attorneys' cannabis enforcement efforts in Indian Country. On December 16, 2014, as a component of the federal spending bill, the Obama administration enacted regulations that prohibit the Department of Justice from using funds to prosecute state-based legal medical cannabis programs.

Laws and regulations affecting our industry are constantly changing

The constant evolution of laws and regulations affecting the marijuana industry could detrimentally affect our operations. Local, state and federal medical marijuana laws and regulations are broad in scope and subject to changing interpretations. These changes may require us to incur substantial costs associated with legal and compliance fees and ultimately require us to alter our business plan. Furthermore, violations of these laws, or alleged violations, could disrupt our business and result in a material adverse effect on our operations. In addition, we cannot predict the nature of any future laws, regulations, interpretations or applications, and it is possible that regulations may be enacted in the future that will be directly applicable to our business.

Risk of government action

While we will use our best efforts to comply with all laws, including federal, state and local laws and regulations, there is a possibility that governmental action to enforce any alleged violations may result in legal fees and damage awards that would adversely affect us.

6

Because our business is dependent upon continued market acceptance by consumers, any negative trends will adversely affect our business operations

We are substantially dependent on continued market acceptance and proliferation of consumers of medical marijuana and recreational marijuana. We believe that as marijuana becomes more accepted the stigma associated with marijuana use will diminish and as a result consumer demand will continue to grow.   While we believe that the market and opportunity in the marijuana space continues to grow, we cannot predict the future growth rate and size of the market. Any negative outlook on the marijuana industry will adversely affect our business operations.

In addition, it is believed by many that large well-funded businesses may have a strong economic opposition to the cannabis industry. We believe that the pharmaceutical industry clearly does not want to cede control of any product that could generate significant revenue. For example, medical marijuana will likely adversely impact the existing market for the current "marijuana pill" Marinol, sold by the mainstream pharmaceutical industry, should marijuana displace other drugs or encroach upon the pharmaceutical industry's products. The pharmaceutical industry is well funded with a strong and experienced lobby that eclipses the funding of the medical marijuana movement. Any inroads the pharmaceutical could make in halting the impending cannabis industry could have a detrimental impact on our business.

FDA Regulation of marijuana and the possible registration of facilities where medical marijuana is grown could negatively affect the cannabis industry which would directly affect our financial condition

Should the federal government legalize marijuana for medical use, it is possible that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration ("FDA") would seek to regulate it under the Food, Drug and Cosmetics Act of 1938. Additionally, the FDA may issue rules and regulations including CGMPs (certified good manufacturing practices) related to the growth, cultivation, harvesting and processing of medical marijuana. Clinical trials may be needed to verify efficacy and safety. It is also possible that the FDA would require that facilities where medical marijuana is grown be registered with the FDA and comply with certain federally prescribed regulations. In the event that some or all of these regulations are imposed, we do not know what the impact would be on the medical marijuana industry and what costs, requirements and possible prohibitions may be enforced. If we are unable to comply with the regulations and/or registration as prescribed by the FDA, we may be unable to continue to operate our business.

Our clients may have difficulty accessing the service of banks

On February 14, 2014, the U.S. government issued rules allowing banks to legally provide financial services to state-licensed marijuana businesses. A memorandum issued by the Justice Department to federal prosecutors re-iterated guidance previously given, this time to the financial industry that banks can do business with legal marijuana businesses and "may not" be prosecuted. The Treasury Department's Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) issued guidelines to banks that "it is possible to provide financial services"" to state-licensed marijuana businesses and still be in compliance with federal anti-money laundering laws. The guidance falls short of the explicit legal authorization that banking industry officials had pushed the government to provide and to date, it is not clear if any banks have relied on the guidance and taken on legal marijuana companies as clients. The aforementioned policy may be administration dependent and a change in presidential administrations may cause a policy reversal and retraction of current policies, wherein legal marijuana businesses may not have access to the banking industry. Also, the inability of potential clients in our target market to open accounts and otherwise use the service of banks may make it difficult for them to contract with us.

Due to our involvement in the cannabis industry, we may have a difficult time obtaining the various insurances that are desired to operate our business, which may expose us to additional risk and financial liability

Insurance that is otherwise readily available, such as general liability, and directors and officer’s insurance, is more difficult for us to find, and more expensive, because we are service providers to companies in the cannabis industry. There are no guarantees that we will be able to find such insurances in the future, or that the cost will be affordable to us. If we are forced to go without such insurances, it may prevent us from entering into certain business sectors, may inhibit our growth, and may expose us to additional risk and financial liabilities.

7

The Company’s industry is highly competitive and we have less capital and resources than many of our competitors which may give them and advantage in developing and marketing products similar to ours or make our products obsolete.

We are involved in a highly competitive industry where we may compete with numerous other companies who offer alternative methods or approaches, who may have far greater resources, more experience, and personnel perhaps more qualified than we do. Such resources may give our competitors an advantage in developing and marketing products similar to ours or products that make our products obsolete. There can be no assurance that we will be able to successfully compete against these other entities.

The Company may be unable to respond to the rapid technological change in its industry and such change may increase costs and competition that may adversely affect its business

Rapidly changing technologies, frequent new product and service introductions and evolving industry standards characterize the Company’s market. The continued growth of the Internet and intense competition in the Company’s industry exacerbate these market characteristics. The Company’s future success will depend on its ability to adapt to rapidly changing technologies by continually improving the performance features and reliability of its products and services. The Company may experience difficulties that could delay or prevent the successful development, introduction or marketing of its products and services. In addition, any new enhancements must meet the requirements of its current and prospective users and must achieve significant market acceptance. The Company could also incur substantial costs if it needs to modify its products and services or infrastructures to adapt to these changes.

The Company also expects that new competitors may introduce products, systems or services that are directly or indirectly competitive with the Company. These competitors may succeed in developing, products, systems and services that have greater functionality or are less costly than the Company’s products, systems and services, and may be more successful in marketing such products, systems and services. Technological changes have lowered the cost of operating communications and computer systems and purchasing software. These changes reduce the Company’s cost of providing services but also facilitate increased competition by reducing competitors’ costs in providing similar services. This competition could increase price competition and reduce anticipated profit margins.

The Company’s industry is highly competitive and we have less capital and resources than many of our competitor, which may give them an advantage in developing and marketing products similar to ours or make our products obsolete.

We are involved in a highly competitive industry where we may compete with numerous other companies who offer alternative methods or approaches, who may have far greater resources, more experience, and personnel perhaps more qualified than we do. Such resources may give our competitors an advantage in developing and marketing products similar to ours or products that make our products obsolete. There can be no assurance that we will be able to successfully compete against these other entities.

The Company’s services are new and its industry is evolving.

You should consider the Company’s prospects in light of the risks, uncertainties and difficulties frequently encountered by companies in their early stage of development, particularly companies in the rapidly evolving legal cannabis industry. To be successful in this industry, the Company must, among other things:

·

develop and introduce functional and attractive service offerings;

·

attract and maintain a large base of consumers;

·

increase awareness of the Company brand and develop consumer loyalty;

·

establish and maintain strategic relationships with distribution partners and service providers;

·

respond to competitive and technological developments;

·

build an operations structure to support the Company business; and

·

attract, retain and motivate qualified personnel.

The Company cannot guarantee that it will succeed in achieving these goals, and its failure to do so would have a material adverse effect on its business, prospects, financial condition and operating results.

8

Some of the Company’s products and services are new and are only in early stages of commercialization. The Company is not certain that these products and services will function as anticipated or be desirable to its intended market. Also, some of the Company’s products and services may have limited functionalities, which may limit their appeal to consumers and put the Company at a competitive disadvantage. If the Company’s current or future products and services fail to function properly or if the Company does not achieve or sustain market acceptance, it could lose customers or could be subject to claims which could have a material adverse effect on the Company business, financial condition and operating results.

As is typical in a new and rapidly evolving industry, demand and market acceptance for recently introduced products and services are subject to a high level of uncertainty and risk. Because the market for the Company is new and evolving, it is difficult to predict with any certainty the size of this market and its growth rate, if any. The Company cannot guarantee that a market for the Company will develop or that demand for Company services will emerge or be sustainable. If the market fails to develop, develops more slowly than expected or becomes saturated with competitors, the Company’s business, financial condition and operating results would be materially adversely affected.

Risks Related to Our Company

Uncertainty of profitability

Our business strategy may result in increased volatility of revenues and earnings. As we will only develop a limited number of products and services at a time, our overall success will depend on a limited number of products and services, which may cause variability and unsteady profits and losses depending on the products and services offered.

Our revenues and our profitability may be adversely affected by economic conditions and changes in the market for medical and recreational marijuana. Our business is also subject to general economic risks that could adversely impact the results of operations and financial condition.

Because of the anticipated nature of the products and services that we will attempt to develop, it is difficult to accurately forecast revenues and operating results and these items could fluctuate in the future due to a number of factors. These factors may include, among other things, the following:

·

Our ability to raise sufficient capital to take advantage of opportunities and generate sufficient revenues to cover expenses.

·

Our ability to source strong opportunities with sufficient risk adjusted returns.

·

Our ability to manage our capital and liquidity requirements based on changing market conditions generally and changes in the developing legal medical marijuana and recreational marijuana industries.

·

The acceptance of the terms and conditions of our licenses and/or the acceptance of our royalties and fees.

·

The amount and timing of operating and other costs and expenses.

·

The nature and extent of competition from other companies that may reduce market share and create pressure on pricing and investment return expectations.

·

Adverse changes in the national and regional economies in which we will participate, including, but not limited to, changes in our performance, capital availability, and market demand.

·

Adverse changes in the projects in which we plan to invest which result from factors beyond our control, including, but not limited to, a change in circumstances, capacity and economic impacts.

·

Adverse developments in the efforts to legalize marijuana or increased federal enforcement.

·

Changes in laws, regulations, accounting, taxation, and other requirements affecting our operations and business.

·

Our operating results may fluctuate from year to year due to the factors listed above and others not listed. At times, these fluctuations may be significant.

9

Management of growth will be necessary for us to be competitive

Successful expansion of our business will depend on our ability to effectively attract and manage staff, strategic business relationships, and shareholders. Specifically, we will need to hire skilled management and technical personnel as well as manage partnerships to navigate shifts in the general economic environment. Expansion has the potential to place significant strains on financial, management, and operational resources, yet failure to expand will inhibit our profitability goals.

We are entering a potentially highly competitive market

The markets for ancillary businesses in the medical marijuana and recreational marijuana industries are competitive and evolving. In particular, we face strong competition from larger companies that may be in the process of offering similar products and services to ours. Many of our current and potential competitors have longer operating histories, significantly greater financial, marketing and other resources and larger client bases than we have (or may be expected to have).

Given the rapid changes affecting the global, national, and regional economies generally and the medical marijuana and recreational marijuana industries, in particular, we may not be able to create and maintain a competitive advantage in the marketplace. Our success will depend on our ability to keep pace with any changes in its markets, especially with legal and regulatory changes. Our success will depend on our ability to respond to, among other things, changes in the economy, market conditions, and competitive pressures. Any failure by us to anticipate or respond adequately to such changes could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, operating results, liquidity, cash flow and our operational performance.

If we fail to establish and maintain an effective system of internal control, we may not be able to report our financial results accurately or to prevent fraud.  Any ability to report and file our financial results accurately and timely could harm our reputation and adversely impact the future trading price of our common stock.

Effective internal control is necessary for us to provide reliable financial reports and prevent fraud. If we cannot provide reliable financial reports or prevent fraud, we may not be able to manage our business as effectively as we would if an effective control environment existed, and our business and reputation with investors may be harmed. As a result, our small size and any current internal control deficiencies may adversely affect our financial condition, results of operation and access to capital.

We currently have insufficient written policies and procedures for accounting and financial reporting with respect to the requirements and application of US GAAP and SEC disclosure requirements. Additionally, there is a lack of formal process and timeline for closing the books and records at the end of each reporting period and such weaknesses restrict the Company’s ability to timely gather, analyze and report information relative to the financial statements.

Because of the Company’s limited resources, there are limited controls over information processing. There is inadequate segregation of duties consistent with control objectives. Our Company’s management is composed of a small number of individuals resulting in a situation where limitations on segregation of duties exist. In order to remedy this situation, we would need to hire additional staff.

The Company’s failure to continue to attract, train, or retain highly qualified personnel could harm the company’s business.

The Company’s success also depends on the Company’s ability to attract, train, and retain qualified personnel, specifically those with management and product development skills. In particular, the Company must hire additional skilled personnel to further the Company’s research and development efforts. Competition for such personnel is intense. If the Company does not succeed in attracting new personnel or retaining and motivating the Company’s current personnel, the Company’s business could be harmed.

10

Risks Related to Our Common Stock

Because we will likely issue additional shares of our common stock, investment in our Company could be subject to substantial dilution.

Investors’ interests in our company will be diluted and investors may suffer dilution in their net book value per share when we issue additional shares. We are authorized to issue 200,000,000 shares of common stock, $0.001 par value per share. As of July 18, 2017, there were 26,287,500 shares of our common stock issued and outstanding. We anticipate that all or at least some of our future funding, if any, will be in the form of equity financing from the sale of our common stock. If we do sell more common stock, investors’ investment in our company will likely be diluted. Dilution is the difference between what you pay for your stock and the net tangible book value per share immediately after the additional shares are sold by us. If dilution occurs, any investment in our company’s common stock could seriously decline in value.

Trading in our common stock on the OTC Pink has been subject to wide fluctuations.

Our common stock is currently quoted for public trading on the OTC Pink. The trading price of our common stock has been subject to wide fluctuations. Trading prices of our common stock may fluctuate in response to a number of factors, many of which will be beyond our control. The stock market has generally experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations that have often been unrelated or disproportionate to the operating performance of companies with no current business operation. There can be no assurance that trading prices and price earnings ratios previously experienced by our common stock will be matched or maintained. These broad market and industry factors may adversely affect the market price of our common stock, regardless of our operating performance. In the past, following periods of volatility in the market price of a company’s securities, securities class-action litigation has often been instituted. Such litigation, if instituted, could result in substantial costs for us and a diversion of management’s attention and resources.

Our Certificate of Incorporation and by-laws provides for indemnification of officers and directors at our expense and limit their liability which may result in a major cost to us and hurt the interests of our shareholders because corporate resources may be expended for the benefit of officers and/or directors.

Our Certificate of Incorporation and By-Laws include provisions that eliminate the personal liability of our directors for monetary damages to the fullest extent possible under the laws of the State of Delaware or other applicable law. These provisions eliminate the liability of our directors and our shareholders for monetary damages arising out of any violation of a director of his fiduciary duty of due care. Under Delaware law, however, such provisions do not eliminate the personal liability of a director for (i) breach of the director's duty of loyalty, (ii) acts or omissions not in good faith or involving intentional misconduct or knowing violation of law, (iii) payment of dividends or repurchases of stock other than from lawfully available funds, or (iv) any transaction from which the director derived an improper benefit. These provisions do not affect a director's liabilities under the federal securities laws or the recovery of damages by third parties.

We do not intend to pay dividends on any investment in the shares of stock of our Company and any gain on an investment in our Company will need to come through an increase in our stock’s price, which may never happen.

We have never paid any cash dividends and currently do not intend to pay any dividends for the foreseeable future. To the extent that we require additional funding currently not provided for in our financing plan, our funding sources may prohibit the payment of a dividend. Because we do not intend to declare dividends, any gain on an investment in our company will need to come through an increase in the stock’s price. This may never happen and investors may lose all of their investment in our company.

Because our securities are subject to penny stock rules, you may have difficulty reselling your shares.

Our shares as penny stocks, are covered by Section 15(g) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 which imposes additional sales practice requirements on broker/dealers who sell our company’s securities including the delivery of a standardized disclosure document; disclosure and confirmation of quotation prices; disclosure of compensation the broker/dealer receives; and, furnishing monthly account statements. These rules apply to companies whose shares are not traded on a national stock exchange, trade at less than $5.00 per share, or who do not meet certain other financial requirements specified by the Securities and Exchange Commission.

11

These rules require brokers who sell “penny stocks” to persons other than established customers and “accredited investors” to complete certain documentation, make suitability inquiries of investors, and provide investors with certain information concerning the risks of trading in such penny stocks. These rules may discourage or restrict the ability of brokers to sell our shares of common stock and may affect the secondary market for our shares of common stock. These rules could also hamper our ability to raise funds in the primary market for our shares of common stock.

FINRA sales practice requirements may also limit a stockholder’s ability to buy and sell our stock.

In addition to the “penny stock” rules described above, the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (known as “FINRA”) has adopted rules that require that in recommending an investment to a customer, a broker-dealer must have reasonable grounds for believing that the investment is suitable for that customer. Prior to recommending speculative low priced securities to their non-institutional customers, broker-dealers must make reasonable efforts to obtain information about the customer’s financial status, tax status, investment objectives and other information. Under interpretations of these rules, FINRA believes that there is a high probability that speculative low priced securities will not be suitable for at least some customers. FINRA requirements make it more difficult for broker-dealers to recommend that their customers buy our common shares, which may limit your ability to buy and sell our stock and have an adverse effect on the market for our shares.

There could be unidentified risks involved with an investment in our securities

The foregoing risk factors are not a complete list or explanation of the risks involved with an investment in the securities. Additional risks will likely be experienced that are not presently foreseen by the Company. Prospective investors must not construe this the information provided herein as constituting investment, legal, tax or other professional advice. Before making any decision to invest in our securities, you should read this entire prospectus and consult with your own investment, legal, tax and other professional advisors. An investment in our securities is suitable only for investors who can assume the financial risks of an investment in the Company for an indefinite period of time and who can afford to lose their entire investment. The Company makes no representations or warranties of any kind with respect to the likelihood of the success or the business of the Company, the value of our securities, any financial returns that may be generated or any tax benefits or consequences that may result from an investment in the Company.

ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS.

Not applicable.

ITEM 2. PROPERTIES.

Our executive offices are located at 200 S Victoria Ave, Pueblo, Co 81003.  We lease this property through a one-year lease beginning on February 1, 2016. The lease expired on January 31, 2017 and we are now leasing on a month to month basis with a monthly rental payment of $800. We believe that this space is adequate for our needs at this time, and we believe that we will be able to locate additional space in the future, if needed, on commercially reasonable terms.

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.

The Company is currently not involved in any litigation that the Company believes could have a materially adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition or results of operations. There is no action, suit, proceeding, inquiry or investigation before or by any court, public board, government agency, self-regulatory organization or other body pending or, to the knowledge of the executive officers of the Company or any of the Company’s subsidiaries, threatened against or affecting the Company, the Company’s Common Stock, any of the Company’s subsidiaries or the Company’s or the Company’s subsidiaries’ officers or directors in their capacities as such, in which an adverse decision could have a material adverse effect.

ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES.

Not applicable.

12

PART II

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR OUR COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES.

(a) Market Information

Our common stock is quoted on the OTC Pink under the symbol “TCKF”.  The OTC Pink is a quotation service that displays real-time quotes, last-sale prices, and volume information in over-the-counter equity securities.

The following table shows, for the periods indicated, the high and low bid prices per share of the Company’s Common Stock as reported by the OTC Pink quotation service. The quotations reflect inter-dealer prices, without retail mark-up, mark-down or commissions, and may not necessarily represent actual transactions.

(b) Holders

As of July 18, 2017, there were approximately 46 stockholders of record. Because shares of the Company’s Common Stock are held by depositaries, brokers and other nominees, the number of beneficial holders of the Company’s shares is larger than the number of stockholders of record.

(c) Dividends

We have never declared or paid dividends on our common stock. We do not intend to declare dividends in the foreseeable future because we anticipate that we will reinvest any future earnings into the development and growth of our business. Any decision as to the future payment of dividends will depend on our results of operations and financial position and such other factors as our Board of Directors in its discretion deems relevant.

(d) Securities Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation Plan

The Company does not have in effect any compensation plans under which the Company’s equity securities are authorized for issuance.

Transfer Agent

Our transfer agent is Island Stock Transfer located at 15500 Roosevelt Blvd, Suite 301, Clearwater, Florida 33760.

13

Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities

On August 3, 2015, the Company entered into a one-year consulting agreement with Acorn Management Partners, LLC.  Under the terms of the agreement, the Company paid compensation of $12,500 for the first month and $10,000 a month thereafter and issued 375,000 shares of the Company’s common stock on August 24, 2015 valued at $146,213.  In addition, as per the agreement, the Company was to issue $75,000 in common stock to be priced at the closing bid price of the last trading day of the previous period during both the third and fourth three-month period. This agreement was terminated on December 3, 2015 and as a result, the additional $150,000 in common stock will not be issued.  As of the date of termination, the Company had paid Acorn Management an aggregate total of $36,500.  The remaining $6,000 due to Acorn was satisfied through the issuance of warrants as per the agreement dated March 29, 2016 (see below).

On August 10, 2015, the Company entered into a second consulting agreement with Acorn Management Partners, LLC, with no termination date, for 1,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock that were authorized to be issued on August 5, 2015 and were issued on August 24, 2015. Under the terms of the agreement, the stock is considered to be fully earned on the date of issuance.  The shares were valued at the date of authorization at $0.3889 per share or $389,900.

On January 15, 2016, the Company entered into a three-year consulting and advisory agreement with Platinum Equity Advisors, LLC, a related party. Compensation consists of a monthly retainer fee of $20,000. In addition, for services rendered through January 15, 2016, the Company issued on February 15, 2016, 8,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at a value of $0.35 per share or $2,788,000. The first month’s retainer was offset by $8,000 for the shares issued, resulting in a reduction of accounts payable and the remainder will be amortized over the life of the agreement. For the year ended July 31, 2016, the Company has recorded $503,389 in consulting expense related to this agreement resulting in an unamortized portion amounting to $2,284,611.

On September 28, 2015, the Company issued 50,000 shares of common stock at $0.20 per share for gross proceeds for working capital of $10,000.

On September 28, 2015, the Company issued 37,500 shares of common stock at $0.20 per share for gross proceeds for working capital of $7,500.

On October 28, 2015, the Company entered into a one-year consulting agreement with Caro Capital LLC. Under the terms of the agreement, the Company made a commitment of $2,500 per month for nine months, until the Company closed on financing. As the agreement terminated on February 18, 2016 and no financing was raised, the Company does not owe the consultant any cash compensation and therefore no accrual is shown on the balance sheet.  According to the terms of the agreement, upon execution the Company is to issue 200,000 warrants for share of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of 0.001 per share for a total purchase price of $200.  In addition, the Company is to issue, and the consultant is to purchase, 200,000 additional warrants per quarter (up to 800,000 warrants in total).  As of January 31, 2016 the Company has issued 400,000 warrants and recorded $127,609 in consulting fees related to the fair value of the warrants.  On February 10, 2016, the Company terminated the agreement dated October 28, 2015 with Caro Capital LLC.  As a result of the termination of the agreement, the 400,000 warrants were cancelled.  On February 10, 2016, 400,000 shares of common stock with a market value of $0.32 per share or $128,000 were issued by the Company as compensation for four months of service.

On March 29, 2016, the Company agreed to issue 6,000,000 warrants to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock as satisfaction of $6,000 in compensation that was owed to Acorn Management Partners, LLC. The warrants have an exercise price of $0.01 and expire ten years from the date of issuance.  The warrants were valued using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model and a fair value of approximately $3,200,000 was expensed.

14

Rule 10B-18 Transactions

During the year ended July 31, 2016, there were no repurchases of the Company’s common stock by the Company.

ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA.

Not applicable

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.

THE FOLLOWING DISCUSSION OF OUR PLAN OF OPERATION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS SHOULD BE READ IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND RELATED NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDED ELSEWHERE IN THIS REPORT. THIS DISCUSSION CONTAINS FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS THAT RELATE TO FUTURE EVENTS OR OUR FUTURE FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE. THESE STATEMENTS INVOLVE KNOWN AND UNKNOWN RISKS, UNCERTAINTIES AND OTHER FACTORS THAT MAY CAUSE OUR ACTUAL RESULTS, LEVELS OF ACTIVITY, PERFORMANCE OR ACHIEVEMENTS TO BE MATERIALLY DIFFERENT FROM ANY FUTURE RESULTS, LEVELS OF ACTIVITY, PERFORMANCE OR ACHIEVEMENTS EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED BY THESE FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS. THESE RISKS AND OTHER FACTORS INCLUDE, AMONG OTHERS, THOSE LISTED UNDER “FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS” AND “RISK FACTORS” AND THOSE INCLUDED ELSEWHERE IN THIS REPORT.

Business Overview

Grasshopper Staffing Inc (the “Grasshopper Staffing”), formally Tomichi Creek Outfitters, was incorporated in the state of Nevada on June 25, 2013.  We are a development stage company with a plan of operation to provide clients with an opportunity to harvest a trophy size elk or deer or to enjoy a guided scenic tour on the western slopes of the Rocky Mountains.  Our operations are located in Sargents, Colorado which is approximately four hours southwest from Denver.  We are located just west of the continental divide surrounded by 12,000 to 14,000-foot mountain peaks.  This territory is remote yet accessible with diverse wildlife which is adjacent to the 1.86 million acre Rio Grande National Forest.  Grasshopper Staffing’s primary business is offering professionally guided Elk or Deer animal hunts.  This area of the country is home to trophy size Elk and Mule Deer.  Our secondary business includes offering guided scenic tours.  Every season offers an opportunity to view diverse wildlife and scenic views for every season of the year.  We plan to offer guided options in addition to providing maps and information on where clients can locate what they are interested in if they wish to trek on their own.

On March 2, 2015, we entered into a Business Acquisition Agreement under which we acquired the business and assets of Grasshopper Staffing in exchange for 250,000 shares of common stock. The assets purchased include the trademark and website, office supplies and office furniture.  Grasshopper is operating as a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company and is now the primary operation of our business.

Grasshopper Staffing was founded in 2015 by Wick, Melanie Osterman, Barbara Ianne, and Cheryl Zanotelli, as a solution to the staffing needs presented in the blossoming cannabis industry in Colorado. Grasshopper Staffing is an agency that serves the Colorado's cannabis employment needs by providing employee recruiting, training, securing proper credentials and ensuring compliance with the ever-changing local and state laws. Grasshopper Staffing specializes in providing budtenders, trimmers, janitorial, security, payroll, armored transport, edible production, infusion specialists, grow consultants, irrigation, retail sales, IT solutions, web design, and event services.

Plan of Operation

Company management and affiliated business development consultants plan to leverage our extensive operational, industry, M&A and finance contacts and experience to quickly expand upon the foundation recently established at Grasshopper Staffing.  We plan to greatly increase our staffing efforts in both the cannabis and non-cannabis space through existing business expansion and acquisitions. Potential cannabis acquisition targets have been identified in Colorado, as well as addition states where cannabis has been legalized for medical or recreational usage with plans for an eventual national footprint. In addition, staffing companies outside of the cannabis space have also been identified as potential acquisition targets, which will allow for diverse sources of revenue.

15

To further our diversification, the company plans to pursue additional acquisition targets within the cannabis space, including businesses specializing in security, testing, proprietary growing equipment, comprehensive facility consulting, facility leasing and unique social media entities. To this end, in the near future “Grasshopper Staffing” will change its name to simply “Grasshopper” to better reflect its plans to aggressively grow into the preeminent multifaceted cannabis company in the fastest growing business space in the United States today.

The cannabis industry in general historically experiences seasonal fluctuations in revenue and net income.  The Company’s revenues reflect two cutting periods resulting in higher revenues in the months of May through July and October through December.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Results of Operations

The Company had $439,736 and $146,305 of revenue during the year ended July 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. The increase of $293,431 was due to revenue achieved by contract staffing services.

General and Administrative Expenses

The Company’s general and administrative expenses were incurred in the amounts of $5,893,055 and $396,089 for the years ended July 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. This increase of $5,496,966 was primarily due to the fair value of warrants in the amount of $3,221,070 that were issued in the year ended July 31, 2016.  Additionally, there was a $702,578 increase in payroll and related expenses which was primarily related to the amortization of stock compensation and a $1,524,770 increase in professional fees during the year ended July 31, 2016 as a result of shares and warrants issued for services.  

Net Loss

The comparable net loss for the year ended July 31, 2016 was $5,779,882, as compared to the net loss of $346,413 for the year ended July 31, 2015. This increased net loss of $5,433,469 was due primarily to the fair value of warrants in the amount of $3,227,070 that were issued in the year ended July 31, 2016.  In addition, there was also an increase in professional fees of approximately $1,500,000 mainly related to shares and warrants issued for services along with an increase in payroll and related expenses amounting to $702,578 mainly related to the amortization of deferred stock compensation.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Working Capital

Current assets for the year ended July 31, 2016 decreased compared to July 31, 2015, primarily due to a decrease in cash and cash equivalents during the year ended July 31, 2016.

Current liabilities for the year ended July 31, 2016 increased compared to July 31, 2015 due to an increase in loans from management and accrued expenses during the year ended July 31, 2016.

Net Cash Used in Operating Activities

Net cash used in operations was $153,907 for the year ended July 31, 2016 compared to $19,517 for the year ended July 31, 2015. This increase was primarily attributable to an increase in net loss during the year ended July 31, 2016, offset by an increase in stock compensation expense, an increase in common stock issued for services, and an increase in the fair value of warrants issued for services in the year ended July 31, 2016.

16

Net Cash Provided by Financing Activities

Cash flows provided by financing activities for the year ended July 31, 2016 were $136,290 compared to $14,071 for year ended July 31, 2015.  This increase is primarily attributed to proceeds from shareholder loans of $110,564 as well as proceeds from the issuance of common stock of $17,501.

The Company’s cash balance at July 31, 2016 was $0. As a result, the Company will need to generate sufficient revenues and/or seek additional funding in the near future. The Company currently does not have a specific plan of how it will obtain such funding; however, the Company anticipates that additional funding will be in the form of debt financing and/or equity financing from the sale of the Company’s common stock.

At this time, the Company cannot provide investors with any assurance that it will be able to generate sufficient revenues and/or obtain sufficient funding from debt financing and/or the sale of its common stock to meet its obligations over the next twelve months. The Company does not have any arrangements in place for any future financing. The Company may also seek to obtain short-term loans from its officers and directors to meet its short-term funding needs. The Company has no material commitments for capital expenditures as of July 31, 2016.

The financial position of the Company at the year ended July 31, 2016 showed a decrease in assets of $21,824 from $49,951 at July 31, 2015.  This was due primarily to the decreases in the Company’s cash account.  The liabilities at July 31, 2016 increased to $359,212 from $61,968 at July 31, 2015. This increase was partially the result of an increase in accounts payable and monies due to a related party.

Going Concern Qualification

We have a history of losses, an accumulated deficit, a negative working capital and have not generated cash from operations to support meaningful ongoing operations. Our Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm has included a “Going Concern Qualification” in their report for the years ended July 31, 2016 and 2015.  The foregoing raises substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.  We intend on financing our future development activities and working capital needs largely from the sale of public equity securities with some additional funding from other traditional financing sources, including term notes until such time that funds provided by operations are sufficient to fund working capital requirements. There is no guarantee that additional capital or debt financing will be available when and to the extent required, or that if available, it will be on terms acceptable to us. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty. The “Going Concern Qualification” might make it substantially more difficult to raise capital.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

The Company believes that the following critical policies affect the Company’s more significant judgments and estimates used in preparation of the Company’s financial statements.

The Company prepares its financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America. These principals require management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Management believes that these estimates are reasonable and have been discussed with the Board; however, actual results could differ from those estimates.

The Company issues restricted stock to consultants for various services and employees for compensation. Cost for these transactions are measured at the fair value of the consideration received or the fair value of the equity instruments issued, whichever is measurable more reliably measurable. The value of the Common Stock is measured at the earlier of: (i) the date at which a firm commitment for performance by the counterparty to earn the equity instruments is reached or (ii) the date at which the counterparty's performance is complete.

The Company issues options and warrants to consultants, directors, and officers as compensation for services. These options and warrants are valued using the Black-Scholes model, which focuses on the current stock price and the volatility of moves to predict the likelihood of future stock moves. This method of valuation is typically used to accurately price stock options and warrants based on the price of the underlying stock.

17

Long-lived assets such as property, equipment and identifiable intangibles are reviewed for impairment whenever facts and circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. When required impairment losses on assets to be held and used are recognized based on the fair value of the asset. The fair value is determined based on estimates of future cash flows, market value of similar assets, if available, or independent appraisals, if required. If the carrying amount of the long-lived asset is not recoverable from its undiscounted cash flows, an impairment loss is recognized for the difference between the carrying amount and fair value of the asset. When fair values are not available, The Company estimates fair value using the expected future cash flows discounted at a rate commensurate with the risk associated with the recovery of the assets. The Company did not recognize any impairment losses for any periods presented.

Fair value estimates used in preparation of the financial statements are based upon certain market assumptions and pertinent information available to management. The respective carrying value of certain on-balance-sheet financial instruments approximated their fair values. These financial instruments include cash, accounts payable, note payable and due to related parties. Fair values were assumed to approximate carrying values for these financial instruments since they are short-term in nature and their carrying amounts approximate fair values or they are receivable or payable on demand.

Revenue Recognition

Revenue is derived from the placement of temporary workers.  The Company recognizes revenue when it is realized or realizable and estimable in accordance with ASC 605, “Revenue Recognition”.  The Company will recognize revenue only when all of the following criteria have been met:

·

Persuasive evidence for an agreement exists;

·

Service has been provided;

·

The fee is fixed or determinable; and,

·

Collection is reasonably assured.

Capital Resources.

We had no material commitments for capital expenditures as of July 31, 2016.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

The Company has no off-balance sheet arrangements as of July 31, 2016.

ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.

We do not hold any derivative instruments and do not engage in any hedging activities.

18

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA.

INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

19

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of Grasshopper Staffing, Inc.:

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Grasshopper Staffing, Inc.  (the “Company”)  as of July 31, 2016, and the related consolidated statement of operations, statement of changes in stockholders’ deficit and cash flows for the year then ended. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. We were not engaged to perform an audit of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Grasshopper Staffing, Inc. as of July 31, 2016 and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year ended July 31, 2016 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern.  As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company has sustained significant net losses and cash flow deficiencies. Those conditions raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans regarding those matters are described in Note 2. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

/s/ RBSM LLP

New York, NY

July 18, 2017

F-1

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Board of Directors and Stockholders of

Grasshopper Staffing, Inc.

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Grasshopper Staffing, Inc. as of July 31, 2015 and the related consolidated statement of operations, changes in stockholders’ deficiency, and cash flows for the year ended July 31, 2015. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management.  Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.  We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Grasshopper Staffing, Inc. as of July 31, 2015, and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for the year then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern.  As shown in the accompanying consolidated financial statements, the Company has significant net losses and cash flow deficiencies. Those conditions raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans regarding those matters are described in Note 2. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

/s/ Stevenson & Company CPAS LLC

Stevenson & Company CPAS LLC

Tampa, Florida

November 23, 2016

F-2

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-3

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-4

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-5

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-6

GRASSHOPPER STAFFING, INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

JULY 31, 2016 and JULY 31, 2015

NOTE 1 - NATURE OF OPERATIONS

Grasshopper Staffing Inc (the “Company”), formally Tomichi Creek Outfitters, was formed in the state of Nevada on June 25, 2013 and its year-end is July 31.

On March 2, 2015, the Company entered into a Business Acquisition Agreement and share exchange under which it acquired the business and assets of Grasshopper Staffing Inc (“Grasshopper Colorado”), formed in the state of Colorado on January 13, 2015. The exchange for $10,651 was represented by 250,000 shares of the Company’s common stock in exchange for all of the outstanding shares of Grasshopper Colorado. The assets purchased include the logo and website, office supplies and office furniture. Grasshopper Colorado is operating as a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company and is now the primary operation of its business.

Grasshopper Colorado was founded as a solution to the staffing needs presented in the blossoming cannabis industry in Colorado. Grasshopper Colorado is an agency that serves the Colorado's cannabis employment needs by providing employee recruiting, training, securing proper credentials and ensuring compliance with the ever-changing local and state laws. Grasshopper Colorado specializes in providing budtenders, trimmers, janitorial, security, payroll, armored transport, edible production, infusion specialists, grow consultants, irrigation, retail sales, IT solutions, web design, and event services.

NOTE 2 - GOING CONCERN

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in conformity with GAAP, which contemplates continuation of the Company as a going concern.  The Company has a history of losses, an accumulated deficit, has negative working capital and has not generated cash from its operations to support meaningful ongoing operations. In view of these matters, the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern is dependent upon advancement of operations and to achieve a level of profitability. The Company intends on financing its future development activities and its working capital needs largely from the sale of public equity securities with some additional funding from other traditional financing sources, including term notes until such time that funds provided by operations are sufficient to fund working capital requirements. The financial statements of the Company do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of recorded assets, or the amounts and classifications of liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.

NOTE 3 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Basis of Presentation

The consolidated financial statements of the Company have been prepared using the accrual basis of accounting in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“U.S. GAAP”).

The consolidated financial statements include the Company’s accounts and those of the Company’s wholly-owned subsidiary. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated.

Reclassifications

Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to current period presentation.

F-7

GRASSHOPPER STAFFING, INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

JULY 31, 2016 and JULY 31, 2015

NOTE 3 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)

Use of Estimates

The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Significant estimates in the accompanying consolidated financial statements include the estimates of useful lives for depreciation.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

The Company considers highly liquid investments that are readily convertible to known amounts of cash with original maturities of three months or less to be cash equivalents.

Accounts Receivable

Accounts receivable represent amounts due from customers in the ordinary course of business from sales activities The Company uses the allowance method for recognizing bad debts. When an account is deemed uncollectible, it is written off against the allowance. At July 31, 2016 and 2015, the Company wrote off $4,396 and $0 to the allowance.

Property and Equipment

Property and equipment are stated at cost, net of accumulated depreciation. Expenditures for major additions and improvements are capitalized while minor replacements and maintenance and repairs, which do not improve or extend the life of such assets, are charged to operations as incurred. Disposals are removed at cost less accumulated depreciation, and any resulting gain or loss is reflected in the statement of operations.  Depreciation is calculated using the straight-line method which depreciates the assets over the estimated useful lives of the depreciable assets ranging from five to seven years.

Long-lived assets such as property, equipment and identifiable intangibles are reviewed for impairment at least annually or whenever facts and circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable.  When required, impairment losses on assets to be held and used are recognized based on the fair value of the asset.  The fair value is determined based on estimates of future cash flows, market value of similar assets, if available, or independent appraisals, if required.  If the carrying amount of the long-lived asset is not recoverable, an impairment loss is recognized for the difference between the carrying amount and fair value of the asset.  The Company did not recognize any impairment losses for any periods presented.

Intangible Assets

Intangible assets with definite useful lives are recorded on the basis of cost and are amortized on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives. The Company uses a useful life of 3 years for website development. The Company evaluates the remaining useful life of intangible assets annually to determine whether events and circumstances warrant a revision to the remaining amortization period. If the estimate of the intangible asset’s remaining useful life is changed, the remaining carrying amount of the intangible asset will be amortized prospectively over that revised remaining useful life. At July 31, 2016, no revision to the remaining amortization period of the intangible assets was made.

F-8

GRASSHOPPER STAFFING, INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

JULY 31, 2016 and JULY 31, 2015

NOTE 3 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset, or paid to transfer a liability, in an orderly transaction between market participants. A fair value hierarchy has been established for valuation inputs that gives the highest priority to quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs. The fair value hierarchy is as follows:

Level 1 Inputs - Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the reporting entity has the ability to access at the measurement date.

Level 2 Inputs - Inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. These might include quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability (such as interest rates, volatilities, prepayment speeds, credit risks, etc.) or inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by market data by correlation or other means.

Level 3 Inputs - Unobservable inputs for determining the fair values of assets or liabilities that reflect an entity's own assumptions about the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the assets or liabilities.

Financial instruments consist of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable and borrowings. The fair value of current financial assets and current financial liabilities approximates their carrying value because of the short-term maturity of these financial instruments.

Revenue Recognition

Revenue is derived from the placement of temporary workers.  The Company recognizes revenue when it is realized or realizable and estimable in accordance with ASC 605, “Revenue Recognition”.  The Company will recognize revenue only when all of the following criteria have been met:

·

Persuasive evidence for an agreement exists;

·

Service has been provided;

·

The fee is fixed or determinable; and,

·

Collection is reasonably assured.

Advertising

Advertising costs are expensed as incurred. As of July 31, 2016 and July 31, 2015, no advertising costs have been incurred.

Basic Net Loss Per Common Share

Basic net loss per common share is computed by dividing the loss available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Dilutive loss per share reflects the potential dilution of securities that could share in the losses of the Company. Because the Company does not have any potentially dilutive securities, the accompanying presentation is only of basic loss per share.

F-9

GRASSHOPPER STAFFING, INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

JULY 31, 2016 and JULY 31, 2015

NOTE 3 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)

Stock Based Compensation

The Company accounts for the grant of restricted stock awards in accordance with ASC 718, “Compensation-Stock Compensation.” ASC 718 requires companies to recognize in the statement of operations the grant-date fair value of equity based compensation. The expense is recognized over the period during which the employee is required to provide service in exchange for the compensation.  Any remaining unrecognized balance will be recognized ratably over the life of the vesting period and is a reduction of stockholders' equity.

The Company accounts for non-employee share-based awards in accordance with the measurement and recognition criteria of ASC 505-50 “Equity-Based Payments to Non-Employees.”

Income Taxes

Under ASC 740, “Income Taxes,” deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to temporary differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. Valuation allowances are established when it is more likely than not that some or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. As of July 31, 2016 there were no deferred taxes due to the uncertainty of the realization of net operating loss or carry forward prior to expiration.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

The Company has reviewed the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) accounting pronouncements and interpretations thereof that have effectiveness dates during the periods reported and in future periods. The Company has carefully considered the new pronouncements that alter previous generally accepted accounting principles and does not believe that any new or modified principles will have a material impact on the corporation’s reported financial position or operations in the near term. The applicability of any standard is subject to the formal review of our financial management and certain standards are under consideration.

In January 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2016­01, which amends the guidance in U.S. GAAP on the classification and measurement of financial instruments. Changes to the current guidance primarily affect the accounting for equity investments, financial liabilities under the fair value option, and the presentation and disclosure requirements for financial instruments. In addition, the ASU clarifies guidance related to the valuation allowance assessment when recognizing deferred tax assets resulting from unrealized losses on available for sale debt securities. The new standard is effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2017, and upon adoption, an entity should apply the amendments by means of a cumulative effect adjustment to the balance sheet at the beginning of the first reporting period in which the guidance is effective. Early adoption is not permitted except for the provision to record fair value changes for financial liabilities under the fair value option resulting from instrument specific credit risk in other comprehensive income. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting this guidance.

In March 2016, the FASB issued an Accounting Standards Update (ASU) “ASU 2016 - 09 Improvements to Employee Share­Based Payment Accounting” which is intended to improve the accounting for employee share­based payments. The ASU simplifies several aspects of the accounting for share­based payment award transactions, including; the income tax consequences, classification of awards as either equity or liabilities, and the classification on the statement of cash flows. The new standard is effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2016, and upon adoption, an entity should apply the amendments by means of a cumulative­effect adjustment to the balance sheet at the beginning of the first reporting period in which the guidance is effective. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting this guidance.

F-10

GRASSHOPPER STAFFING, INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

JULY 31, 2016 and JULY 31, 2015

NOTE 3 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)

In April 2016, the FASB issued an Accounting Standards Update (ASU) “ASU 2016 - 10 Revenue from Contract with Customers: identifying Performance Obligations and Licensing”. The amendments in this Update clarify the two following aspects (a) contracts with customers to transfer goods and services in exchange for consideration and (b) determining whether an entity’s promise to grant a license provides a customer with either a right to use the entity’s intellectual property (which is satisfied at a point in time) or a right to access the entity’s intellectual property (which is satisfied over time). The amendments in this Update are intended to reduce the degree of judgement necessary to comply with Topic 606. This guidance has no effective date as yet. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting this guidance.

In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016­15, "Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments." ASU 2016­15 is intended to reduce diversity in practice in how certain transactions are classified in the statement of cash flows. ASU 2016­15 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within those fiscal years, with early adoption permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting this guidance.

In November 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. (“ASU”) 2016­20, an amendment to Accounting Standards Update No. 2014­09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606). This ASU addressed several areas related to contracts with customers. This topic is not yet effective and will become effective with Topic 606. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting this guidance.

In January 2017, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. (“ASU”) 2017­02, an amendment to Topic 805, Business Combinations. The amendments in this Update clarify the definition of a business with the objective of adding guidance to assist entities with evaluating whether transactions should be accounted for as acquisitions (or disposals) of assets or businesses. The amendments in this Update affect all reporting entities that must determine whether they have acquired or sold a business. The amendments in this Update provide a more robust framework to use in determining when a set of assets and activities is a business. The amendments in this Update apply to annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017. The amendments in this Update should be applied prospectively on or after the effective date. No disclosures are required at transition. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting this guidance.

In January 2017, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. (“ASU”) 2017­04, an amendment to Topic 350, Intangibles - Goodwill and Other, an entity no longer will determine goodwill impairment by calculating the implied fair value of goodwill by assigning the fair value of a reporting unit to all of its assets and liabilities as if that reporting unit had been acquired in a business combination. Because these amendments eliminate Step 3 from the goodwill impairment test, they should reduce the cost and complexity of evaluating goodwill for impairment. An entity should apply the amendments in this Update on a prospective basis. The amendments in this Update are effective for Goodwill impairment tests in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019. Early adoption is permitted for interim or annual goodwill impairment tests performed on testing dates after January 1, 2017. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting this guidance.

Any new accounting standards, not disclosed above, that have been issued or proposed by FASB that do not require adoption until a future date are not expected to have a material impact on the financial statements upon adoption.

F-11

GRASSHOPPER STAFFING, INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

JULY 31, 2016 and JULY 31, 2015

NOTE 4 - PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT

Property and equipment consisted of the following at July 31, 2016 and 2015:

Depreciation expense for the years ended July 31, 2016 and 2015 was $961 and $472 respectively.

NOTE 5 - INTANGIBLE ASSETS

Intangible assets consisted of the following at July 31, 2016 and 2015:

Amortization expense for the years ended July 31, 2016 and 2015 was $1,671 and $822 respectively.

NOTE 6 - ACCOUNTS PAYABLE AND ACCRUED EXPENSES

Accounts payable and accrued expenses consist of the following at July 31, 2016 and 2015:

NOTE 7 - PAYROLL LIABILITIES

The Company has past due payroll liabilities due to the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) for unpaid payroll taxes, penalties and interest for 2015 and 2016. The original unpaid payroll taxes to the IRS for these periods totaled $32,966.

As of July 31, 2016, the past due balance due to the IRS, including penalties, interest, and fees, totaled $51,618. During the year ended July 31, 2016 the Company incurred $9,539 in penalties and interest from the IRS. Subsequent to year end, on February 10, 2017, the Company paid back $10,116 of the outstanding liability, interest and penalties related to the March 31, 2016 tax period. The Company is working with the IRS to negotiate a payment plan for the remaining balance due.

F-12

GRASSHOPPER STAFFING, INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

JULY 31, 2016 and JULY 31, 2015

NOTE 8 - FACTORING ARRANGEMENTS

On April 13, 2016, the Company entered into a revenue-based factoring agreement with TUV Investments LLC (“TUV”), pursuant to which for consideration of $20,000 the Company agreed to sell, assign and transfer all of the Company’s future receipts until the repayment of the agreed upon purchase price of $27,600 is paid in full pursuant to specified repayment terms.  The repayment terms provide, that the Company shall pay TUV the greater of an authorized daily debit (ACH withdrawal) of $199 on each available banking day, or 14% of the Company’s daily receipts until the $27,600 is paid in full. The Company has recognized all expenses related to this agreement in the aggregate total of $8,305 as factoring expenses on the date of the agreement.  The obligations of the Company and its subsidiaries under the Factoring Agreement are secured by substantially all the assets of the Company and its subsidiaries.  As of July 31, 2016, this agreement has an outstanding balance of $13,740.

On May 6, 2016, the Company entered into a revenue-based factoring agreement with Merchant Cash Advance Fund One (“Merchant”), pursuant to which for consideration of $7,500 the Company agreed to sell, assign and transfer all of the Company’s future receipts until the repayment of the agreed upon purchase price of $10,875 is paid in full pursuant to specified repayment terms.  The repayment terms provide, that the Company shall pay Merchant the greater of an authorized daily debit (ACH withdrawal) of $108 on each available banking day, or 5% of the Company’s daily receipts until the $10,875 is paid in full. The Company has recognized all expenses related to this agreement in the aggregate total of $3,774 as factoring expenses on the date of the agreement.  The obligations of the Company and its subsidiaries under the Factoring Agreement are secured by substantially all the assets of the Company and its subsidiaries.  As of July 31, 2016, this agreement has an outstanding balance of $5,691.

On May 6, 2016, the Company entered into a revenue-based factoring agreement with Samson Horus (“Samson”), pursuant to which for consideration of $7,500 the Company agreed to sell, assign and transfer all of the Company’s future receipts until the repayment of the agreed upon purchase price of $10,875 is paid in full pursuant to specified repayment terms. The repayment terms provide, that the Company shall pay Samson the greater of an authorized daily debit (ACH withdrawal) of $108 on each available banking day, or 5% of the Company’s daily receipts until the $10,875 is paid in full. The Company has recognized all expenses related to this agreement in the aggregate total of $4,475 as factoring expenses on the date of the agreement.  The obligations of the Company and its subsidiaries under the Factoring Agreement are secured by substantially all the assets of the Company and its subsidiaries.  As of July 31, 2016, this agreement has an outstanding balance of $5,591.

NOTE 9 - CONCENTRATIONS

The following table sets forth information as to each customer that accounted for 10% or more of the Company’s revenues for the years ended July 31, 2016 and 2015. At July 31, 2016, three customers accounted for 62% of the Company’s total revenue.

NOTE 10 - INCOME TAXES

The Company files corporate income tax returns in the United States (federal), Nevada and Colorado. The Company is subject to federal, state and local income tax examinations by tax authorities through inception.

F-13

GRASSHOPPER STAFFING, INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

JULY 31, 2016 and JULY 31, 2015

NOTE 10 - INCOME TAXES (continued)

The Company's tax expense differs from the "expected" tax expense for Federal income tax purposes (computed by applying the United States Federal tax rate of 34% and State tax rate net of federal benefit of 3.01% and 0.00% to income before taxes related to operations in Colorado and Nevada, respectfully), as follows:

The tax effects of temporary differences that give rise to the Company’s net deferred tax assets as of July 31, 2016 and 2015 are as follows:

The Company has approximately $454,000 of net operating losses (“NOL”) carried forward to offset taxable income, if any, in future years which expire commencing in fiscal 2036. In assessing the realization of deferred tax assets, management considers whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will be realized. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income during the periods in which those temporary differences become deductible. Management considers the scheduled reversal of deferred tax liabilities, projected future taxable income and tax planning strategies in making this assessment. Based on the assessment, management has established a full valuation allowance against all deferred tax asset relating to NOLs for every period because it is more likely than not that all of the deferred tax asset will not be realized. The tax returns for 2013 through 2016 remain open for inspection by federal and state taxing authorities.  Utilization of the NOL’s may be limited under IRC certain 382 due to ownership changes.

NOTE 11 - RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

In support of the Company’s efforts and cash requirements, it has relied on advances from related parties until such time that the Company can support its operations or attains adequate financing through sales of its equity or traditional debt financing. There is no formal written commitment for continued support by shareholders. Amounts represent advances or amounts paid in satisfaction of liabilities. The advances are considered temporary in nature and have not been formalized by a promissory note. As of July 31, 2016 and July 31, 2015, members of management have loaned the Company $121,935 and $16,671, respectively. The loans are payable on demand and carry no interest.

In addition, the Company has accrued expenses related to the January 15, 2016 consulting and advisory agreement (See Note 12).  As of July 31, 2016 and 2015, the Company has accrued $103,742 and $0, respectively in monthly retainer fees and travel expenses related to this agreement.

The amounts and terms of the above transactions may not necessarily be indicative of the amounts and terms that would have been incurred had comparable transactions been entered into with independent third parties.

F-14

GRASSHOPPER STAFFING, INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

JULY 31, 2016 and JULY 31, 2015

NOTE 12 - CAPITAL STOCK

The Company is authorized to issue an aggregate of 200,000,000 common shares with a par value of $0.001 per share. No preferred shares have been authorized or issued. At July 31, 2016 and July 31, 2015, the Company had 26,287,500 and 16,425,000 common shares issued and outstanding, respectively.

On March 2, 2015, the Company entered into a Business Acquisition Agreement and share exchange under which the Company acquired the business and assets of Grasshopper Colorado in exchange for $10,651, which was represented by 250,000 shares of common stock in exchange for 100% of the Grasshopper Colorado’s common shares. The acquisition resulted in a change in management control, therefore, the investment in the subsidiary value has been eliminated.

Shares Issued for Services:

On June 12, 2015, the Company's Board of Directors approved the issuance of 3,175,000 shares of common stock to various employees and consultants. The fair market value of the shares was $1,301,750 at the date of grant, of which $322,533 was recognized as an expense in the year ended July 31, 2015. The remaining balance of $979,217 was recorded to additional paid in capital and is being amortized over the life of the employment agreements (15 - 18 months).  The Company has recorded $921,133 of consulting expense for the year ended July 31, 2016 related to these agreements.

On August 3, 2015, the Company entered into a one-year consulting agreement with Acorn Management Partners, LLC.  Under the terms of the agreement, the Company paid compensation of $12,500 for the first month and $10,000 a month thereafter and issued 375,000 shares of the Company’s common stock on August 24, 2015 valued at $146,213.  In addition, as per the agreement, the Company was to issue $75,000 in common stock to be priced at the closing bid price of the last trading day of the previous period during both the third and fourth three-month period. This agreement was terminated on December 3, 2015 and as a result, the additional $150,000 in common stock will not be issued.  As of the date of termination, the Company had paid Acorn Management an aggregate total of $36,500.  The remaining $6,000 due to Acorn was satisfied through the issuance of warrants as per the agreement dated March 29, 2016 (see below).

On August 10, 2015, the Company entered into a second consulting agreement with Acorn Management Partners, LLC, with no termination date, for 1,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock that were authorized to be issued on August 5, 2015 and were issued on August 24, 2015. Under the terms of the agreement, the stock is considered to be fully earned on the date of issuance.  The shares were valued at the date of authorization at $0.3889 per share or $389,900.

On January 15, 2016, the Company entered into a three-year consulting and advisory agreement with Platinum Equity Advisors, LLC, a related party. Compensation consists of a monthly retainer fee of $20,000. In addition, for services rendered through January 15, 2016, the Company issued on February 15, 2016, 8,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at a value of $0.35 per share or $2,788,000. The first month’s retainer was offset by $8,000 for the shares issued, resulting in a reduction of accounts payable and the remainder will be amortized over the life of the agreement. For the year ended July 31, 2016, the Company has recorded $503,389 in consulting expense related to this agreement resulting in an unamortized portion amounting to $2,284,611.

Shares Issued for Working Capital:

On September 28, 2015, the Company issued 50,000 shares of common stock at $0.20 per share for gross proceeds for working capital of $10,000.

On September 28, 2015, the Company issued 37,500 shares of common stock at $0.20 per share for gross proceeds for working capital of $7,500.

F-15

GRASSHOPPER STAFFING, INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

JULY 31, 2016 and JULY 31, 2015

NOTE 12 - CAPITAL STOCK (continued)

Warrants:

On October 28, 2015, the Company entered into a one-year consulting agreement with Caro Capital LLC. Under the terms of the agreement, the Company made a commitment of $2,500 per month for nine months, until the Company closed on financing. As the agreement terminated on February 18, 2016 and no financing was raised, the Company does not owe the consultant any cash compensation and therefore no accrual is shown on the balance sheet.  According to the terms of the agreement, upon execution the Company is to issue 200,000 warrants for share of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of 0.001 per share for a total purchase price of $200.  In addition, the Company is to issue, and the consultant is to purchase, 200,000 additional warrants per quarter (up to 800,000 warrants in total).  As of January 31, 2016 the Company has issued 400,000 warrants and recorded $127,609 in consulting fees related to the fair value of the warrants.  On February 10, 2016, the Company terminated the agreement dated October 28, 2015 with Caro Capital LLC.  As a result of the termination of the agreement, the 400,000 warrants were cancelled.  On February 10, 2016, 400,000 shares of common stock with a market value of $0.32 per share or $128,000 were issued by the Company as compensation for four months of service.

On March 29, 2016, the Company agreed to issue 6,000,000 warrants to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock as satisfaction of $6,000 in compensation that was owed to Acorn Management Partners, LLC. The warrants have an exercise price of $0.01 and expire ten years from the date of issuance.  The warrants were valued using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model and a fair value of approximately $3,200,000 was expensed.

The fair value of the warrants issued and the significant assumptions used to determine those fair values, using a Black-Scholes option-pricing model are as follows:

A summary of the Company’s warrant activity during the years ended July 31, 2016 ad 2015 is presented below:

As of July 31, 2016, there are no options outstanding to acquire any additional shares of common stock of the Company.

F-16

GRASSHOPPER STAFFING, INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

JULY 31, 2016 and JULY 31, 2015

NOTE 13 - COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Legal Matters

In the normal course of business, the Company may become a party to litigation matters involving claims against the Company. The Company's management is unaware of any pending or threatened assertions and there are no current matters that would have a material effect on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

The Company’s operations are subject to significant risks and uncertainties including financial, operational and regulatory risks, including the potential risk of business failure.

Operating Leases

The company’s executive offices are located at 200 S Victoria Ave, Pueblo, Co 81003.  The property is leased on a month to month basis with a monthly rental payment of $800.

NOTE 14 - SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

The Company follows the guidance in Sections 855-10-50 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for the disclosure of subsequent events. The Company has evaluated the period after the balance sheet date up through the date of filing, which is the date that the consolidated financial statements were issued, and determined that, there were no subsequent events or transactions that required recognition or disclosure in the consolidated financial statements.

F-17

ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE.

On March 6, 2017, Stevenson & Company CPAs, LLP (“Stevenson”) informed the Company that Stevenson was resigning, effective immediately, as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm. Stevenson resigned because Stevenson declined to stand for re-appointment.

During the fiscal year ended July 31, 2015 and in the subsequent interim period through March 6, 2017, there were (i) no “disagreements” (as that term is described in Item 304(a)(1)(iv) of Regulation S-K and the related instructions) between the Company and Stevenson on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure, or auditing scope or procedure, which disagreements, if not resolved to the satisfaction of Scrudato, would have caused Scrudato to make reference to the subject matter of such disagreements in its reports on the consolidated financial statements for such years, and (ii) no “reportable events” (as that term is described in Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K).

Stevenson’s reports on the consolidated financial statements of the Company for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015 did not contain any adverse opinion or disclaimer of opinion, and were not qualified or modified as to uncertainty, audit scope or accounting principles.

On March 7, 2017, the Board of Directors of the Company engaged RBSM, LLP (“RBSM”) as the Company’s new independent registered public accounting firm.

During the fiscal years ended July 31, 2015 and 2014 and in the subsequent interim period through March 7, 2017, neither the Company nor anyone acting on its behalf consulted RBSM regarding either (i) the application of accounting principles to a specified transaction, either completed or proposed; or the type of audit opinion that might be rendered with respect to the consolidated financial statements of the Company, and neither a written report nor oral advice was provided to the Company by RBSM that RBSM concluded was an important factor considered by the Company in reaching a decision as to any accounting, auditing or financial reporting issue or (ii) any matter that was either the subject of a “disagreement” (as that term is used in Item 304(a)(1)(iv) of Regulation S-K and the related instructions) or a “reportable event” (as that term is defined in Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K).

ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.

(a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Our management, with the participation of our President and Chief Financial Officer, carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of our “disclosure controls and procedures” (as defined in the Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15-d-15(e)) as of the end of the period covered by this report (the “Evaluation Date”). Based upon that evaluation, the chief executive and chief financial officer concluded that as of the Evaluation Date, our disclosure controls and procedures are ineffective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act (i) is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms and (ii) is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our chief executive and chief financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

(b) Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act). Our management assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of July 31, 2016. Based on such evaluation, our CEO and Principal Financial Officer concluded that, as of December 31, 2016, our internal controls over financial reporting were not effective.

In making this assessment, our management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission in Internal Control-Integrated Framework. Our management has concluded that, as of July 31, 2016, our internal control over financial reporting is not effective based on these criteria. Material weaknesses noted by our management include lack of a functioning audit committee; lack of a majority of outside directors on our board of directors, resulting in ineffective oversight in the establishment and monitoring of required internal controls and procedures; inadequate segregation of duties consistent with control objectives and affecting the functions of authorization, recordkeeping, custody of assets, and reconciliation; and, management dominated by a single individual/small group without adequate compensating controls.

20

This annual report does not include an attestation report of our registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management’s report was not subject to attestation by our registered public accounting firm pursuant to temporary rules of the SEC that permit us to provide only management’s report in this annual report.”

(c) Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting, as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act, during our most recently completed fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION

None.

PART III

ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE.

The following table sets forth information concerning our officers and directors as of the date hereof.  The directors of the Company serve until their successors are elected and shall qualify. Executive officers are elected by the Board of Directors and serve at the discretion of the directors.

Set forth below is a brief description of the background and business experience of each of our executive officers and directors.

Melanie Osterman, President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, age 63

Ms. Osterman has over 20 years’ experience in management experience in multiple fields of employment.  Form 2005 until her present position, she was business development director for Security Title Insurance for ten years. She was in charge of all aspects of customer relations and training employees and customers on regulations in the industry. She also served as marketing and business development in the highly regulated banking industry at Pueblo Bank & Trust. She brings that experience to the highly regulated cannabis industry and has been a key player in gaining both state and national exposure in the media for Grasshopper Staffing, Inc.

Jeremy Gindro, Director, age 26

Mr. Gindro is the sole Director of the Company.  From September 1, 2005 through Present, Mr. Gindro has been a big game guide for individuals and groups of hunters.  From May 2008 through Present, Mr. Gindro is employed as a Supervisor working for Jim Gindro Construction, Pueblo, Colorado.  His responsibilities include operating heavy machinery including back hoes and bobcats to dig foundations for new homes, septic tanks, and underground utilities lines and piping for new and existing homes. Mr. Gindro is also instrumental in procuring new business for the Company and supervising all phases of the rough build-out of single family structures.

Involvement in Certain Legal Proceedings

To the best of the Company’s knowledge, none of the Company’s directors or executive officers has, during the past ten years:

·

been convicted in a criminal proceeding or been subject to a pending criminal proceeding (excluding traffic violations and other minor offenses);

·

had any bankruptcy petition filed by or against the business or property of the person, or of any partnership, corporation or business association of which he was a general partner or executive officer, either at the time of the bankruptcy filing or within two years prior to that time;

21

·

been the subject of any order, judgment, or decree, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, of any court of competent jurisdiction or federal or state authority, permanently or temporarily enjoining, barring, suspending or otherwise limiting, his involvement in any type of business, securities, futures, commodities, investment, banking, savings and loan, or insurance activities, or to be associated with persons engaged in any such activity;

·

been found by a court of competent jurisdiction in a civil action or by the SEC or the Commodity Futures Trading Commission to have violated a federal or state securities or commodities law, and the judgment in such civil action has not been reversed, suspended, or vacated;

·

been the subject of, or a party to, any federal or state judicial or administrative order, judgment, decree, or finding, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, relating to (i) an alleged violation of any federal or state securities or commodities law or regulation, (ii) any law or regulation respecting financial institutions or insurance companies including, but not limited to, a temporary or permanent injunction, order of disgorgement or restitution, civil money penalty or temporary or permanent cease-and-desist order, or removal or prohibition order, or (iii) any law or regulation prohibiting mail or wire fraud or fraud in connection with any business entity; or

·

been the subject of, or a party to, any sanction or order, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, of any self-regulatory organization (as defined in Section 3(a)(26) of the Exchange Act), any registered entity (as defined in Section 1(a)(29) of the Commodity Exchange Act), or any equivalent exchange, association, entity or organization that has disciplinary authority over its members or persons associated with a member.

Except as set forth in the Company’s discussion below in “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence”, none of the Company’s directors or executive officers has been involved in any transactions with the Company or any of the Company’s directors, executive officers, affiliates, or associates which are required to be disclosed pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Commission.

Term of Office

The Company’s directors are elected by the Company’s stockholders for a one-year term until the next annual general meeting of the Company’s stockholders, or until removed by the stockholders in accordance with the Company’s bylaws. The Company’s officers are appointed by the Board and hold office until removed by the Board.

Code of Ethics

The Company does not currently have a code of ethics, and because the Company has only limited business operations and only three officers and six directors, the Company believes that a code of ethics would have limited utility. The Company intends to adopt such a code of ethics as the Company’s business operations expand and the Company has more employees.

Board Committees

As we only have one board member and given our limited operations, we do not have separate or independent audit or compensation committees. Our Board of Directors has determined that it does not have an “audit committee financial expert,” as that term is defined in Item 407(d)(5) of Regulation S-K. In addition, we have not adopted any procedures by which our shareholders may recommend nominees to our Board of Directors.

ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION.

The following table summarizes all compensation recorded by us in the past two years for:

·

our principal executive officer or other individual serving in a similar capacity,

·

our two most highly compensated executive officers other than our principal executive officer who were serving as executive officers at July 31, 2016 as that term is defined under Rule B-7 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

·

up to two additional individuals for whom disclosure would have been required but for the fact that the individual was not serving as an executive officer at July 31, 2016.

22

Summary Compensation Table

-------

(1)

Ms. Osterman has served as our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer since May 2015.  She received 850,000 shares of the Company’s common stock as compensation.

(2)

Ms. Wick served as our Chief Executive Officer from March 2015 until May 2015.

(3)

Mr. Gindro served as our Chief Executive Officer from June 2013 until February 2015.

Director Compensation

We do not currently pay any cash fees to our directors, nor do we pay director’s expenses in attending board meetings.

Executive Employment Agreements

Melanie Osterman and the Company signed an agreement dated May 8, 2015, which Ms. Osterman received 850,000 shares of the Company’s common stock in return for duties as Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer.

ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS.

The following table sets forth certain information as of July 18, 2017 regarding the number and percentage of our Common Stock (being our only voting securities) beneficially owned by each officer, director, each person (including any “group” as that term is used in Section 13(d)(3) of the Exchange Act) known by us to own 5% or more of our Common Stock, and all officers and directors as a group.

23

(1)

The address of our executive officer, director and beneficial owner Grasshopper Staffing, Inc., 200 South Victoria Avenue, Pueblo, CO 81003

(2)

As used in this table, “beneficial ownership” means the sole or shared power to vote, or to direct the voting of, a security, or the sole or share investment power with respect to a security (i.e., the power to dispose of, or to direct the disposition of a security).

(3)

Unless otherwise indicated, we have been advised that all individuals or entities listed have the sole power to vote and dispose of the number of shares set forth opposite their names. For purposes of computing the number and percentage of shares beneficially owned by a security holder, any shares which such person has the right to acquire within 60 days of July 18, 2017 are deemed to be outstanding, but those shares are not deemed to be outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage ownership of any other security holder. We currently do not maintain any equity compensation plans. As of July 18, 2017, there were 26,287,500 shares issued and outstanding.

(4)

Represents 1,375,000 shares of Common Stock held by Platinum Equity Advisors, LLC and 6,000,000 shares of Common Stock issuable under warrants currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of July 18, 2017.

Changes in Control

We are not aware of any arrangements that may result in “changes in control” as that term is defined by the provisions of Item 403(c) of Regulation S-K.

ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE.

In support of the Company’s efforts and cash requirements, it has relied on advances from related parties until such time that the Company can support its operations or attains adequate financing through sales of its equity or traditional debt financing. There is no formal written commitment for continued support by shareholders. Amounts represent advances or amounts paid in satisfaction of liabilities. The advances are considered temporary in nature and have not been formalized by a promissory note. As of July 31, 2016 and July 31, 2015, members of management have loaned the Company $121,935 and $16,671, respectively. The loans are payable on demand and carry no interest.

On January 15, 2016, the Company entered into a three-year consulting and advisory agreement with Platinum Equity Advisors, LLC, a related party. Compensation consists of a monthly retainer fee of $20,000. In addition, for services rendered through January 15, 2016, the Company issued on February 15, 2016, 8,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at a value of $0.35 per share or $2,788,000. The first month’s retainer was offset by $8,000 for the shares issued, resulting in a reduction of accounts payable and the remainder will be amortized over the life of the agreement. For the year ended July 31, 2016, the Company has recorded $503,389 in consulting expense related to this agreement resulting in an unamortized portion amounting to $2,284,611.

In addition, the Company has accrued expenses related to the January 15, 2016 consulting and advisory agreement (See Note 12).  As of July 31, 2016 and 2015, the Company has accrued $103,742 and $0, respectively in monthly retainer fees and travel expenses related to this agreement.

The amounts and terms of the above transactions may not necessarily be indicative of the amounts and terms that would have been incurred had comparable transactions been entered into with independent third parties.

Director Independence

We currently have no independent directors. Because our common stock is not currently listed on a national securities exchange, we have used the definition of “independence” of The NASDAQ Stock Market to make this determination. NASDAQ Listing Rule 5605(a)(2) provides that an “independent director” is a person other than an officer or employee of the company or any other individual having a relationship that, in the opinion of the company’s board of directors, would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director. The NASDAQ listing rules provide that a director cannot be considered independent if:

24

·

the director is, or at any time during the past three years was, an employee of the company;

·

the director or a family member of the director accepted any compensation from the company in excess of $120,000 during any period of 12 consecutive months within the three years preceding the independence determination (subject to certain exclusions, including, among other things, compensation for board or board committee service);

·

a family member of the director is, or at any time during the past three years was, an executive officer of the company;

·

the director or a family member of the director is a partner in, controlling stockholder of, or an executive officer of an entity to which the company made, or from which the company received, payments in the current or any of the past three fiscal years that exceed 5% of the recipient’s consolidated gross revenue for that year or $200,000, whichever is greater (subject to certain exclusions);

·

the director or a family member of the director is employed as an executive officer of an entity where, at any time during the past three years, any of the executive officers of the company served on the compensation committee of such other entity; or-

·

The director or a family member of the director is a current partner of the company’s outside auditor, or at any time during the past three years was a partner or employee of the company’s outside auditor, and who worked on the company’s audit.

The Company does not currently have a separately designated audit, nominating, or compensation committee.

ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES.

The following table sets forth the aggregate fees billed for each of the last two fiscal years for professional services rendered by the principal accountant for the audit of the Company’s annual financial statements and review of financial statements included in the Company’s quarterly reports or services that are normally provided by the accountant in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements for those fiscal years.

25

PART IV

ITEM 15. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

* Included herewith

26

SIGNATURES

In accordance with Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

In accordance with the Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

27