HEIDRICK & STRUGGLES INTERNATIONAL INC - Quarter Report: 2007 June (Form 10-Q)

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

For the transition period from          to         

Commission File Number 0-25837

HEIDRICK & STRUGGLES INTERNATIONAL, INC.

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)

233 South Wacker Drive-Suite 4200

Chicago, Illinois

60606-6303

(Address of Principal Executive Offices)

(312) 496-1200

(Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code)

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months, and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer ¨            Accelerated filer x            Non-accelerated filer ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

As of July 30, 2007, there were 18,165,542 shares of the Company’s common stock outstanding.

HEIDRICK & STRUGGLES INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

INDEX

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Consolidated Financial Statements

HEIDRICK & STRUGGLES INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(In thousands, except share amounts)

The accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements.

1

HEIDRICK & STRUGGLES INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(In thousands, except share amounts)

The accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements.

2

HEIDRICK & STRUGGLES INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(In thousands, except per share amounts)

(Unaudited)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

3

HEIDRICK & STRUGGLES INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY AND

COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

(In thousands)

(Unaudited)

The accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements.

4

HEIDRICK & STRUGGLES INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(In thousands)

(Unaudited)

The accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements.

5

Heidrick & Struggles International, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(All tables in thousands, except per share amounts)

(Unaudited)

The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements of Heidrick & Struggles International, Inc., and subsidiaries (the “Company”), included herein have been prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue and expenses. Actual results could differ from those estimates. In the opinion of management, the financial statements reflect all adjustments, which are of a normal recurring nature, necessary to present fairly the Company’s financial position, results of operations, stockholders’ equity and cash flows. These financial statements and notes are to be read in conjunction with the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the SEC on March 15, 2007.

A complete listing of the Company’s significant accounting policies is discussed in Note 2, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the SEC on March 15, 2007.

Recently Issued Financial Accounting Standards

In June 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued FASB Interpretation No. 48 “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes– an interpretation of FASB Statement 109” (“FIN 48”). FIN 48 establishes a single model to address accounting for uncertain tax positions. FIN 48 clarifies the accounting for income taxes by prescribing a minimum recognition threshold a tax position is required to meet before being recognized in the financial statements. FIN 48 also provides guidance on derecognition, measurement classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition. Upon adoption as of January 1, 2007, the Company increased its existing reserves for uncertain tax positions by $0.2 million, largely related to an increase in non-U.S. income tax matters. This increase was recorded as a cumulative effect adjustment to retained earnings. For additional information, see Note 10, Income Taxes.

In June 2006, the FASB ratified the Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) consensus on EITF Issue No. 06-3, “How Taxes Collected From Customers and Remitted to Governmental Authorities Should Be Presented in the Income Statement (That Is, Gross versus Net Presentation)” (“EITF 06-3”). The scope of EITF 06-3 includes any tax assessed by a governmental authority that is directly imposed on a revenue-producing transaction between a seller and a customer, and allows for the adoption of an accounting policy of presenting taxes either on a gross basis within revenue or on a net basis. The Company collects various value added taxes on executive search and leadership consulting services, which have been and continue to be accounted for on a net basis. The Company adopted EITF 06-3 on January 1, 2007, the required effective date. The adoption of EITF 06-3 did not have an effect on the Company’s financial condition or results of operations.

In September 2006, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements” (“SFAS No. 157”). SFAS No. 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 is effective as of January 1, 2008. The Company is currently evaluating the impact that the adoption of SFAS No. 157 will have on the Company’s financial condition and results of operations.

In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities-Including an amendment of SFAS No. 115” (“SFAS No. 159”), to permit entities to choose to elect, at specified election dates, to measure eligible financial instruments at fair value. SFAS No. 159 is effective

6

as of January 1, 2008, with early adoption permitted if the Company chooses to apply the provisions of SFAS No. 157. The Company is currently evaluating the impact that the adoption of SFAS No. 159 may have on the Company’s financial condition and results of operations.

The Company accounts for stock-based compensation in accordance with SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004), “Share-Based Payment” (“SFAS No. 123R”), which was adopted January 1, 2006 using the modified prospective method.

A summary of information with respect to share-based compensation is as follows:

Restricted Stock Units

Restricted stock unit activity for the six months ended June 30, 2007:

As of June 30, 2007, there was $39.3 million of pre-tax total restricted stock unit compensation expense related to nonvested awards not yet recognized, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 2.1 years.

Non-qualified Stock Options

Activity for non-qualified stock options for the six months ended June 30, 2007:

7

As of June 30, 2007, there was $1.7 million of pre-tax total stock option compensation expense related to nonvested awards not yet recognized, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 1.2 years.

Additional information pertaining to non-qualified stock options:

The Company deposited $7.9 million in a U.S dollar bank account during the fourth quarter of 2006 in support of a $7.5 million bank guarantee related to a tax audit in a European country. The bank deposit of $7.9 million is higher than the guarantee due to the bank’s requirement of a higher cash collateral deposit. The Company earns a market rate of interest on this cash deposit, which is reviewed quarterly. The $7.5 million bank guarantee is determined based upon the tax audit assessment of €4.3 million (equivalent to $5.8 million) plus future accrued interest on that assessment amount. See Note 13, Commitments and Contingencies, for a discussion of the tax audit.

Upon review of the terms of the restrictions of the use of the pledged cash, the Company has reported these funds as restricted cash on the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006. The restricted cash is reflected in non-current assets based on the terms of the guarantee which require that it be renewed annually until the results of the tax audit are settled. At this time, the Company is not able to determine when a settlement will be reached.

In the second quarter of 2007, the restricted cash balance includes $1.2 million of lease guarantees and deposits. In accordance with the terms of the lease agreements, the cash balances are restricted through the term of the lease.

In 2006, the Company recorded $27.7 million of goodwill, substantially all of which is expected to be deductible for income tax purposes, and $12.8 million of identifiable intangible assets related to the acquisition of Highland Partners, and has allocated these amounts to the Americas, Europe and Asia Pacific regions. During the first six months of 2007, the Company recorded $1.3 million of adjustments to the initial purchase price allocation as a result of the final settlement of certain liabilities that were based on estimates recorded at the time of acquisition.

In 2007, the Company recorded $0.8 million of goodwill and $0.4 million of identifiable intangible assets related to the acquisition of RentonJames, a privately held executive search and leadership consultancy boutique based in New Zealand. These amounts have been recorded in the Asia Pacific region. The acquisition was funded from existing cash for $1.2 million. The previous owners of RentonJames, who are now Heidrick & Struggles employees, will be eligible to receive earnout payments up to $3.0 million based on achievement of certain revenue metrics in 2007, 2008 and 2009 such that the total purchase price will not exceed $4.0 million.

8

The purchase price allocation and resulting goodwill and identifiable intangible assets recorded at June 30, 2007 could change as a result of the finalization of certain purchase price accounting adjustments. The Company does not believe these changes would be material.

Goodwill

Changes in the carrying amount of goodwill by segment for the six months ended June 30, 2007 are as follows:

Other Intangible Assets

The carrying amount of amortizable intangible assets and the related accumulated amortization are as follows:

During 2006, the Company recorded $12.8 million of intangible assets related to the acquisition of Highland Partners, consisting of client relationships of $10.4 million amortized over 13 years; candidate database of $1.8 million amortized over 6 years; non-compete agreements of $0.2 million amortized over 3 years; and backlog of $0.4 million which was completely amortized during the fourth quarter of 2006.

During 2007, the Company recorded $0.4 million of intangible assets related to the acquisition of RentonJames, consisting entirely of client relationships amortized over 12 years.

Intangible amortization expense for the three months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006 was $0.6 million and $0.2 million, respectively. Intangible amortization expense for the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006 was $1.2 million and $0.5 million, respectively. The estimated intangible amortization expense is approximately $2.4 million for fiscal years 2007, 2008 and 2009, $2.0 million for fiscal year 2010 and $1.7 million for fiscal year 2011. These amounts are based on intangible assets recorded as of June 30, 2007 and actual amortization expense could differ from these estimates as a result of future acquisitions and other factors.

9

The Company maintains a pension plan for certain employees in Germany. The pensions are individually fixed euro amounts that vary depending on the function and the eligible years of service of the employee.

The components of net periodic benefit cost are as follows:

The pension benefits are fully reinsured through a group insurance contract with Victoria Lebensversicherung AG. The change in the fair value of these assets approximates the net periodic benefit cost for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007.

A reconciliation of the basic and diluted earnings per common share, and the shares used in the computation, are as follows:

Options to purchase 0.6 million shares of common stock that were outstanding at June 30, 2006, were not included in the respective computation of diluted earnings per share as the exercise prices of these options were greater than the average market price of the common shares.

10

Changes in the accrual for restructuring charges for the six months ended June 30, 2007 are as follows:

The Company expects that cash outlays over the next twelve months related to restructuring charges accrued at June 30, 2007 will be $2.9 million. The remaining accrued restructuring charges of $7.9 million, principally for contractual lease obligations net of sublease income, are expected to be paid over the remaining lease terms of vacated properties, which extend through 2013.

The realized and unrealized gains (losses), net of consultants’ share of the gains (losses) and other costs, arising from the equity and warrant portfolio are as follows:

11

In determining the quarterly provision for income taxes, the Company uses an estimated annual effective tax rate based on expected annual income by jurisdiction, statutory tax rates, and tax planning opportunities available in the various jurisdictions in which the Company operates. The impact of significant discrete items is separately recognized in the quarter in which they occur.

In the second quarter of 2007, the Company reported income before taxes of $21.5 million and recorded an income tax provision of $0.5 million. The Company’s effective tax rate for the second quarter of 2007 was 2.3%, which is significantly lower than the estimated annual effective tax rate before discrete items of 39.1% as a result of releasing the valuation allowance associated with foreign tax credits, and the Company’s ability to benefit from these credits in the future. The recent significant improvement in the financial performance of the Company’s foreign branches has allowed the Company to benefit from these foreign tax credits. These items resulted in a net tax benefit in the quarter of $8.5 million.

For the first six months of 2007, the Company reported income before taxes of $39.9 million and recorded an income tax provision of $8.8 million. The Company’s effective tax rate for the six months ended June 30, 2007 was 22.0%. This rate was lower than the estimated annual effective tax rate before discrete items of 39.1% primarily due to the discrete items recorded in the second quarter of 2007 as discussed above.

In the second quarter of 2006, the Company reported income before taxes of $16.2 million and recorded an income tax provision of $5.8 million resulting in an effective tax rate of 36.0%.

For the first six months of 2006, the Company reported income before taxes of $26.8 million and recorded an income tax provision of $10.5 million. The Company’s effective tax rate for the six months ended June 30, 2006 was 39.2%. This rate was higher than the estimated annual effective tax rate before discrete items of 36.0% primarily due to non-cash tax adjustments recorded in the first six months of 2006 as a result of the Company’s transition from deducting foreign income taxes paid to claiming them as a credit in 2006.

In June 2006, the FASB issued FIN 48 which establishes a single model to address accounting for uncertain tax positions. FIN 48 clarifies the accounting for income taxes by prescribing a minimum recognition threshold a tax position is required to meet before being recognized in the financial statements. FIN 48 also provides guidance on derecognition, measurement classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition. Upon adoption as of January 1, 2007, the Company increased its existing reserves for uncertain tax positions by $0.2 million, largely related to an increase in non-U.S. income tax matters. This increase was recorded as a cumulative effect adjustment to retained earnings.

As of January 1, 2007, the Company had $5.8 million of unrecognized tax benefits. If recognized, approximately $5.6 million, net of federal tax benefits, would be recorded as a component of income tax expense. There have been no significant changes to these amounts during the quarter ended June 30, 2007.

12

In many cases the Company’s uncertain tax positions are related to tax years that remain subject to examination by the relevant taxable authorities. The following table summarizes these open tax years by major jurisdiction:

(1) Includes federal as well as state and local jurisdictions, as applicable.

The Company is currently under audit by several U.S. state and local jurisdictions and several foreign jurisdictions. It is likely that the examination phase of several of these audits will conclude in 2007. Additionally, there are several statutes of limitation expected to close within the next 12 months. It is reasonably possible that a reduction of up to $1.7 million in the unrecognized tax benefits may occur by June 30, 2008.

Estimated interest and penalties related to the underpayment of income taxes are classified as a component of the provision for income taxes in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. Accrued interest and penalties were $1.3 million as of January 1, 2007.

13

The Company operates its executive search and leadership consulting services in three geographic regions: the Americas, which includes the United States, Canada, Mexico and Latin America; Europe, which includes the Middle East and Africa; and Asia Pacific.

For segment purposes, reimbursements of out-of-pocket expenses classified as revenue are reported separately and therefore are not included in the net revenue by geographic region. The Company believes that analyzing trends in revenue before reimbursements (net revenue) and analyzing operating expenses as a percentage of net revenue more appropriately reflects the Company’s core operations.

The revenue, operating income, depreciation and amortization, and capital expenditures, by segment, are as follows:

14

The identifiable assets, and goodwill and other intangible assets, by segment, are as follows:

The Company has provided a bank guarantee to a European country’s tax authority in approximately the amount of the tax authority’s audit assessment plus future interest as required by law. The amount of this bank guarantee is $7.5 million. The bank guarantee is determined based upon the tax audit assessment plus future accrued interest. See Note 4, Restricted Cash.

The Company has issued guarantees supporting the payment of obligations of certain subsidiaries in Europe and Asia Pacific for office leases. The guarantees were made to secure the respective lease agreements and are for the term of the lease agreements, which extend through 2013. For each guarantee issued, should the subsidiary default on a lease payment, the Company would have to perform under the guarantee. The maximum amount of

15

undiscounted payments the Company would be required to make in the event of default on all outstanding guarantees is $1.5 million as of June 30, 2007. No amount has been accrued for the Company’s obligation under these guaranty arrangements as no event of default exists.

Litigation

The Company has various pending claims and litigation matters arising in the course of its business, some of which involve claims for damages that are substantial in amount. Some of these matters are covered by insurance. Although the Company’s ultimate liability in these matters cannot be determined, based upon information currently available, the Company believes the ultimate resolution of such claims and litigation will not have a material adverse effect on its financial condition, results of operations or liquidity.

Contingencies

During the fourth quarter of 2005, a European country commenced a tax audit that is ongoing for the years 2001 through 2004, including an examination of the Company’s arrangement with professional service companies that provide consulting services to the Company. On November 24, 2006, the examining tax authority issued a final assessment in the amount of €4.3 million (equivalent to $5.8 million). No penalty has been included in this assessment. This final assessment has been appealed by the Company and the enforcement of the assessment has been suspended until a final determination of the appeal. The Company has provided a bank guarantee to the tax authority in the amount of the final assessment as required by local law. See Note 4, Restricted Cash and Note 12, Guarantees. At this time, the Company believes that the likelihood of an unfavorable outcome is not probable and that the potential amount of any loss cannot be reasonably estimated. The Company also believes that the amount of a final assessment, if any, would not be material to the Company’s financial condition.

16

This Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations as well as other sections of this quarterly report on Form 10-Q contain forward-looking statements. The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 provides a safe harbor for forward-looking statements. The forward-looking statements are based on current expectations, estimates, forecasts and projections about the industry in which we operate, and management’s beliefs and assumptions. Forward-looking statements may be identified by the use of words such as “expects,” “anticipates,” “intends,” “plans,” “believes,” “seeks,” “estimates,” “projects,” “forecasts,” and similar expressions. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve certain known and unknown risks, uncertainties and assumptions that are difficult to predict. Actual outcomes and results may differ materially from what is expressed, forecasted or implied in the forward-looking statements. Factors that may affect the outcome of the forward-looking statements include, among other things, our ability to attract and retain qualified executive search consultants; the condition of the economies in the United States, Europe, or elsewhere; social or political instability in markets in which we operate; the impact of foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations; price competition; the ability to forecast, on a quarterly basis, variable compensation accruals that ultimately are determined based on the achievement of annual results; delays or difficulties in integrating Highland Partners search operations; our ability to achieve the planned cost savings from our cost reduction initiatives; our ability to sublease or assign unused office space; our ability to realize our tax loss carryforwards; the timing of any deferred tax asset valuation allowance reversals; the mix of profit or loss by country; an impairment of our goodwill and other intangible assets; and delays in the development and/or implementation of new technology and systems. For more information on the factors that could affect the outcome of forward-looking statements, refer to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 under Risk Factors in Item 1. We caution the reader that the list of factors may not be exhaustive. We undertake no obligation to update publicly any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

Executive Overview

Our Business

We are a leading provider of executive search and leadership consulting services. We help our clients build leadership teams by facilitating the recruitment, management and deployment of senior executives for their executive management and board positions. Focusing on top-level services offers us several advantages that include access to, and influence with, key decision makers, increased potential for recurring search consulting engagements, higher fees per search, enhanced brand visibility, and global footprint, which create added barriers to entry for potential competitors. Working at the top of client organizations also allows us to attract and retain high-caliber consultants.

In addition to executive search, we provide a range of leadership consulting services to clients. These services include succession planning, top team effectiveness, executive assessment, talent management, executive development, and M&A human capital effectiveness.

We provide our services to a broad range of clients through the expertise of 398 consultants located in 26 countries throughout the world. Our executive search services are provided on a retained basis. Revenue before reimbursements of out-of-pocket expenses (“net revenue”) consists of retainers and indirect expenses billed to clients. Typically, we are paid a retainer for our executive search services equal to approximately one-third of the estimated first year compensation for the position to be filled. In addition, if the actual compensation of a placed candidate exceeds the estimated compensation, we often are authorized to bill the client for one-third of the excess. Indirect expenses are calculated as a percentage of the retainer with certain dollar limits per search. For leadership consulting services, we are paid an agreed upon fee on a project basis.

Key Performance Indicators

We manage and assess Heidrick & Struggles’ performance through various means, with the primary financial and operational measures including net revenue growth, operating income, operating margin, consultant headcount,

17

new search confirmation trends, consultant productivity measured as revenue per consultant, and average fee per executive search.

Revenue growth is driven by a combination of additional consultants, an increase in executive searches, higher productivity levels and higher average fees per search or service. With the exception of compensation expense, incremental increases in revenue do not necessarily result in proportionate increases in costs, particularly operating and administrative expenses, thus potentially improving operating margins.

The number of consultants, confirmation trends, number of searches completed, productivity levels and the average fee per search will vary from quarter to quarter, affecting revenue growth and operating margin.

Our Compensation Model

Our compensation model closely aligns the interests of our consultants, our Company and our shareholders. Consultants are rewarded for individual performance based on a system that directly ties compensation to the amount of net revenue for which the consultant is responsible. Each quarter, we review and update the expected annual performance and compensation accruals for our consultants. At the group and company level, variable compensation is based, and thus recorded, on our performance against revenue and profitability targets approved by the Human Resources and Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors. As a result, the variable portion of compensation expense may fluctuate significantly from quarter to quarter.

Recent Developments

In May 2007, Richard I. Beattie was elected Non-Executive Chairman of our Board of Directors. Mr. Beattie succeeds Thomas J. Friel who retired as Chairman on May 24, 2007. Mr. Beattie has served on our Board since 2002 and is currently Chairman of Simpson Thacher & Bartlett, LLP and has practiced law at that firm since 1968. He also serves on the board of Harley-Davidson, Inc.

2007 Outlook

Based on the first six months of 2007 results, we are increasing our 2007 full-year guidance for net revenue of between $580 million and $595 million, up from our previous guidance of between $560 million and $580 million initially provided in March 2007. This updated guidance represents growth in net revenue over 2006 levels of approximately 21 percent to 24 percent and reflects our goal to accelerate revenue growth. We continue to target a 2007 full-year operating margin of approximately 13 percent.

Following the non-cash tax benefit in the 2007 second quarter related to the reversal of a valuation allowance against foreign tax credits, net income and earnings per share are expected to reflect a full-year effective tax rate of between 35 percent and 42 percent. This guidance also reflects our tax planning strategy and current expectation to incorporate our UK branch in the 2007 fourth quarter. Quarterly and full-year tax rate estimates can be significantly impacted by country-level results and can vary significantly by reporting period, as well as by discrete items that require immediate recognition in a particular quarter.

Results of Operations

We operate our executive search and leadership consulting services in three geographic regions: the Americas, Europe, and Asia Pacific.

For segment purposes, reimbursements of out-of-pocket expenses classified as revenue are reported separately and therefore are not included in the net revenue by geographic region. We believe that analyzing trends in revenue before reimbursements (net revenue) and analyzing operating expenses as a percentage of net revenue more appropriately reflect our core operations.

18

The following table summarizes, for the periods indicated, the results of our operations as a percentage of revenue before reimbursements (net revenue):