HEIDRICK & STRUGGLES INTERNATIONAL INC - Annual Report: 2009 (Form 10-K)

Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

Commission File No. 0-25837

HEIDRICK & STRUGGLES INTERNATIONAL, INC.

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)

233 South Wacker Drive, Suite 4200, Chicago, Illinois 60606-6303

(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)

(312) 496-1200

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.    Yes  ¨    No  x

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 of Section 15(d) of the Act.    Yes  ¨    No  x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes  ¨    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definition of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large Accelerated Filer  ¨    Accelerated Filer  x    Non-Accelerated Filer  ¨    Smaller Reporting Company  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes  ¨    No  x

The aggregate market value of the registrant’s Common Stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant on June 30, 2009 was approximately $308,113,600 based upon the closing market price of $18.25 on that date of a share of Common Stock as reported on the Nasdaq Global Stock Market. As of February 22, 2010, there were 17,075,266 shares of the Company’s Common Stock outstanding.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Portions of the registrant’s definitive Proxy Statement for its Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on May 27, 2010, are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Form 10-K.

Table of Contents

HEIDRICK & STRUGGLES INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Table of Contents

PART I

ITEM 1. BUSINESS

Overview

Heidrick & Struggles International, Inc. (“Heidrick & Struggles”) is a premier leadership advisory firm providing executive search and leadership consulting services. We help our clients build leadership teams by facilitating the recruitment, management and deployment of senior executives. Focusing on top-level services offers us several advantages that include access to and influence with key decision makers, increased potential for recurring search and consulting engagements, higher fees per search, enhanced brand visibility, and leveraged global footprint, which create added barriers to entry for potential competitors. Working at the top of client organizations also allows us to attract and retain high-caliber consultants.

In addition to executive search, we provide a range of leadership consulting services to clients. These services include succession planning, executive assessment, talent retention management, executive development, transition consulting for newly appointed executives, and M&A human capital integration consulting.

Heidrick & Struggles has been a leadership advisor for more than 56 years. We provide our services to a broad range of clients through the expertise of 359 consultants located in 40 countries throughout the world as of December 31, 2009. For many of our clients, our global access to and knowledge of regional and functional markets and candidate talent is an important differentiator of our business. We provide our executive search services on a retained basis, recruiting senior executives whose first year base salary and bonus averaged approximately $300,000 in 2009 on a worldwide basis. Our clients include the following:

The executive search industry is highly fragmented, consisting of several thousand executive search firms worldwide. Executive search firms are generally separated into two broad categories: retained and contingency. Retained executive search firms fulfill their clients’ senior leadership needs by identifying potentially qualified candidates and assisting clients in evaluating and assessing these candidates. Retained executive search firms generally are compensated for their services regardless of whether the client employs a candidate identified by the search firm and are generally retained on an exclusive basis. Retained executive search firms normally charge a fee for their services equal to approximately one-third of the first year’s total compensation for the position being filled. In contrast, contingency search firms are compensated only upon successfully placing a recommended candidate.

We are a retained executive search firm. Our search process typically consists of the following steps:

1

Table of Contents

Available Information

We maintain an Internet website at http://www.heidrick.com. Our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and amendments to these reports are available free of charge on this site as soon as reasonably practicable after the reports are filed with or furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission. We also post news releases on our financial results, investor presentations and other documents containing additional information related to our company on this site. Our Internet website and the information contained in or accessible from our website are for informational purposes only and are not incorporated into this annual report on Form 10-K.

Organization

Our organizational structure, which is arranged by geography and industry/functional practices, is designed to enable us to better understand our clients’ cultures, operations, business strategies, industries and regional markets for executive talent.

Geographic Structure.    We provide senior-level executive search and leadership consulting services to our clients worldwide through a network of more than 70 offices in 40 countries. Major locations are staffed with consultants, research associates, administrative assistants and other support staff. Administrative functions are centralized where possible, although certain support and research functions are situated regionally because of variations in local requirements.

Our worldwide network includes affiliate relationships in Finland, South Africa, Turkey and Portugal. We have no financial investment in these affiliates but receive licensing fees from them for the use of our name and our databases. Licensing fees are less than 1% of our net revenue.

Industry Practices.    We report and operate our executive search business in seven broad industry groups: Financial Services, Consumer, Industrial, Technology, Life Sciences, Business and Professional Services and Education and Social Enterprise. These industry categories and their relative sizes, as measured by net revenue for 2009 are as follows:

Within each broad industry group are a number of industry sub sectors. Consultants often specialize in one or more sub sectors to provide clients with market intelligence and candidate knowledge specific to their industry. For example, within the Financial Services sector our business is diversified among a number of industry sub sectors including Asset & Wealth Management, Consumer Financial Services, Investment Banking and Capital Markets, Insurance, Private Equity/Venture Capital, and Real Estate.

2

Table of Contents

We service our clients through unified global executive search teams who specialize in industry practices. This go-to-market strategy allows us to better leverage our global diversity and market intelligence to provide better client service. Each client is served by one global account team, which we believe is a key differentiator from our competition.

Functional Practices.    Our executive search consultants also specialize in searches for specific “C-level” functional positions, which are roles that generally report directly to the chief executive officer. These include chief financial officers, chief information officers, chief legal officers, chief marketing officers and chief human resources officers.

Our Global Functional Practices include CEO & Board of Directors; Chief Information Officers; Chief Sales Officers; Chief Marketing Officers; Financial Officers; Chief Human Resources Officers; Legal, Risk & Compliance; Real Estate; Research & Development; and Supply Chain & Transportation.

Our team of executive search consultants may service clients from any one of our offices around the world. For example, an executive search for a chief financial officer of an industrial company located in the United Kingdom may involve a consultant in the United Kingdom with an existing relationship with the client, another executive search consultant in the United States with expertise in our Industrial practice and a third executive search consultant with expertise in recruiting chief financial officers. This same industrial client may also engage us to perform skill-based assessments for each of its senior managers, which could require the expertise of one of our leadership advisory consultants trained in this service.

Information by Geographic Segment

Americas.    As of December 31, 2009, we had 166 executive search consultants in our Americas segment, which includes the United States, Canada, Mexico and Latin America. Our Americas segment generated approximately 51% of our worldwide net revenue in 2009. The largest offices in this region, as defined by net revenue, are located in New York, Chicago and San Francisco.

Europe.    As of December 31, 2009, we had 116 executive search consultants in our European segment, which includes the Middle East and Africa. Our European segment generated approximately 30% of our worldwide net revenue in 2009. Our offices in the United Kingdom, Germany and France produced the highest levels of net revenue in this segment.

Asia Pacific.    As of December 31, 2009, we had 77 executive search consultants in the Asia Pacific segment. This segment generated approximately 19% of our worldwide net revenue in 2009. Australia, China (including Hong Kong), and Singapore produced the highest levels of net revenue in this segment.

For financial information relating to each geographic segment, see Note 20, Segment Information, in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Seasonality

There is no discernible seasonality in our business, although as a percentage of total annual net revenue, the first quarter is typically the lowest. Revenue and operating income have historically varied by quarter and are hard to predict from quarter to quarter. In addition, the volatility in the global economy impacts our quarterly revenue and operating income. On average, the variance between the highest and lowest amount of quarterly net revenue, as expressed as a percentage of annual net revenue, is approximately 5 percentage points.

3

Table of Contents

Clients and Marketing

Our consultants market the firm’s executive search and leadership consulting services through two principal means: targeted client calling and industry networking with clients and referral sources. These efforts are supported by proprietary databases, which provide our consultants with information as to contacts made by their colleagues with particular referral sources, candidates and clients. In addition, we benefit from a significant number of referrals generated by our reputation for high quality service and successfully completed assignments, as well as repeat business resulting from our ongoing client relationships.

Either by agreement with the clients or to maintain strong client relationships, executive search firms generally refrain from recruiting employees of a client, and possibly other entities affiliated with that client, for a specified period of time but typically not more than one year from the commencement of a search. We seek to mitigate any adverse effects of these off-limits arrangements by strengthening our long-term relationships, allowing us to communicate our belief to prospective clients that we can conduct searches without these off-limits arrangements impeding the quality of our work.

No single client accounted for more than 2% of our net revenue in 2009, 2008 or 2007. Our top ten clients in 2009, 2008 and 2007 in aggregate accounted for less than 9% of total net revenue.

Information Management Systems

We rely on technology to support our consultants and staff in the search process. Our technology infrastructure consists of internally developed databases containing candidate profiles and client records, coupled with online services and industry reference sources. We use technology to manage and share information on current and potential clients and candidates, to communicate to both internal and external constituencies and to support administrative functions.

Professional Staff and Employees

Our professionals are generally categorized either as consultants or associates. Associates assist consultants by providing research support, coordinating candidate contact and performing other engagement-related functions. As of December 31, 2009, we had 1,400 full-time equivalent employees, of whom 359 were executive search consultants, 349 were associates and 692 were other search, support and corporate staff.

In each of the past five years, no single consultant accounted for a material portion of our net revenue. We recruit our consultants from other executive search or human capital firms, or in the case of executive search, consultants new to search who have worked in industries or functions represented by our practices. In the latter case, these are often seasoned executives with extensive contacts and outstanding reputations who are entering the search profession as a second career and who we train in our techniques and methodologies. We are not a party to any collective bargaining agreement, and we consider relations with our employees to be good.

Competition

The executive search industry is highly competitive. While we face competition to some degree from all firms in the industry, we believe our most direct competition comes from four established global retained executive search firms that conduct searches primarily for the most senior-level positions within an organization. In particular, our competitors include Egon Zehnder International, Korn/Ferry International, Russell Reynolds Associates, Inc. and Spencer Stuart & Associates. To a lesser extent, we also face competition from smaller boutique and Internet-based firms that specialize in certain regional markets or industry segments. Each firm with which we compete is also a competitor in the marketplace for effective consultants.

Overall, the search industry has relatively few barriers to entry. Higher barriers exist, however, for global retained executive search firms like ours that focus primarily on conducting searches for senior-level positions

4

Table of Contents

that can provide leadership consulting services at the senior level. At this level, clients rely more heavily on a search firm’s reputation, global access and the experience level of its consultants. We believe that the segment of executive search in which we compete is more quality-sensitive than price-sensitive. As a result, we compete on the level of service we offer, reflected by our client services specialties and, ultimately, by the quality of our search results. We believe that our emphasis on senior-level executive search, the depth of experience of our search consultants and our global presence enable us to compete favorably with other executive search firms.

Competition in the leadership consulting services markets in which we operate are highly fragmented, with no universally recognized market leaders.

5

Table of Contents

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

Our executive officers as of March 1, 2010 are as follows:

There are no family relationships between any executive officer or director. The following information sets forth the business experience for at least the past five years for each of our executive officers as of March 1, 2010:

L. Kevin Kelly was elected Chief Executive Officer and a Director in September 2006. He was elected President in May 2007. Previously, Mr. Kelly was President, Europe, Middle East, Africa and Asia Pacific from March 2005 to September 2006; Regional Managing Partner, Asia Pacific from September 2002 to March 2005; and Office Managing Partner, Tokyo from February 2002 to September 2002. He joined us in 1997.

K. Steven Blake joined us in July 2005, when he was elected General Counsel and Secretary. He was elected Executive Vice President in January 2007. Previously, Mr. Blake was General Counsel of Aquion Partners, LP from 2001 to 2005; and Associate General Counsel for General Electric Capital Corporation from 1998 to 2001.

Richard J. Caldera joined us in May 2008, when he was elected Executive Vice President and Chief Human Resources Officer. Previously, Mr. Caldera was Senior Vice President, Human Resources, Mergers and Acquisitions, for the Healthcare Sector at Royal Philips Electronics N.V. from 2004 to 2008; Senior Vice President, Human Resources, at Skanska AB from 2002 to 2004; and Vice President and Senior Human Resources Officer, Global Operations at CNA Financial Corporation from 1998 to 2002.

Charles G. Davis was elected Managing Partner, Global Practices in December 2008. Previously, Mr. Davis was Regional Managing Partner, Asia Pacific from September 2006 to April 2009; Office Managing Partner, Sydney, Australia, since January 2006; and Managing Partner of the Chief Information Officer Practice in Asia Pacific since October 2002. Previously, Mr. Davis was Managing Partner of the Technology and Business and Professional Services Practices in Asia Pacific from April 1999 to December 2005. He joined us in 1998.

Scott J. Krenz joined us in August 2008, when he was elected Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. Previously, Mr. Krenz was Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer at Navigant Consulting from 2007 to 2008; Chief Financial Officer at Sapient Corporation from 2004 to 2006; and held senior finance positions of increasing responsibility at Electronic Data Systems Corporation (EDS) from 1985 to 2004.

6

Table of Contents

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

In addition to other information in this Form 10-K, the following risk factors should be carefully considered in evaluating our business because such factors may have a significant impact on our business, operating results, cash flows and financial condition. As a result of the risks set forth below and elsewhere in this Form 10-K, and the risks discussed in our other Securities and Exchange Commission filings, actual results could differ materially from those projected in any forward-looking statements.

We depend on attracting and retaining qualified consultants.

Our success depends upon our ability to attract and retain consultants who possess the skills and experience necessary to fulfill our clients’ needs. Our ability to hire and retain qualified consultants could be impaired by any diminution of our reputation, decrease in compensation levels relative to our competitors or modifications of our total compensation philosophy or competitor hiring programs. If we cannot attract, hire and retain qualified consultants, our business, financial condition and results of operations may suffer.

We may not be able to prevent our consultants from taking our clients with them to another firm.

Our success depends upon our ability to develop and maintain strong, long-term relationships with our clients. Although we work on building these relationships between our firm and our clients, in many cases, one or two consultants have primary responsibility for a client relationship. When a consultant leaves one executive search firm and joins another, clients who have established relationships with the departing consultant may move their business to the consultant’s new employer. We may also lose clients if the departing consultant has widespread name recognition or a reputation as a specialist in executing searches in a specific industry or management function. Historically, we have not experienced significant revenue loss from this potential client portability. If we fail to limit departing consultants from moving business to another employer, our business, financial condition and results of operations may be adversely affected.

Our success depends on our ability to maintain our professional reputation and brand name.

We depend on our overall professional reputation and brand name recognition to secure new engagements and hire qualified consultants. Our success also depends on the individual reputations of our consultants. We obtain many of our new engagements from existing clients or from referrals by those clients. A client who is dissatisfied with our work can adversely affect our ability to secure new engagements. If any factor hurts our reputation, including poor performance, we may experience difficulties in competing successfully for both new engagements and qualified consultants. Failure to maintain our professional reputation and brand name could seriously harm our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Because our clients may restrict us from recruiting their employees we may be unable to fill existing executive search assignments.

Clients frequently require us to refrain from recruiting certain of their employees when conducting executive searches on behalf of other clients. These restrictions generally remain in effect for no more than one year following the commencement of an engagement. However, the specific duration and scope of the off-limits arrangements depend on the length of the client relationship, the frequency with which the client engages us to perform searches, the number of assignments we have performed for the client and the potential for future business with the client.

If a prospective client believes that we are overly restricted by these off-limits arrangements from recruiting the employees of our existing clients, these prospective clients may not engage us to perform their executive searches, and as a result, our business, financial condition and results of operations may suffer.

7

Table of Contents

We face aggressive competition.

The global executive search industry is extremely competitive and highly fragmented. We compete with other large global executive search firms, smaller specialty firms, and more recently with Internet-based firms. Specialty firms can focus on regional or functional markets or on particular industries. Some of our competitors may possess greater resources, greater name recognition and longer operating histories than we do in particular markets or practice areas. There are limited barriers to entry into the search industry and new search firms continue to enter the market. Many executive search firms that have a smaller client base may be subject to fewer off-limits arrangements. In addition, our clients or prospective clients may decide to perform executive searches using in-house personnel. Finally, competitors sometimes reduce their fees in order to attract clients and increase market share. Because we typically do not discount our fees, we may experience some loss of net revenue. We may not be able to continue to compete effectively with existing or potential competitors. Our inability to meet these competitive challenges could have an adverse impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We rely heavily on information management systems.

Our success depends upon our ability to store, retrieve, process and manage substantial amounts of information. To achieve our goals, we must continue to improve and upgrade our information management systems. We may be unable to license, design and implement, in a cost-effective and timely manner, improved information systems that allow us to compete effectively. In addition, business process reengineering efforts may result in a change in software platforms and programs. Such efforts may result in an acceleration of depreciation expense over the shortened expected remaining life of the software and present transitional problems. In addition, if we experience any interruptions or loss in our information processing capabilities, our business, financial condition and results of operations may suffer.

We face the risk of liability in the services we perform.

We are exposed to potential claims with respect to the executive search process. A client could assert a claim for violations of off-limits arrangements, breaches of confidentiality agreements or professional malpractice. The growth and development of our other leadership advisory services brings with it the potential for new types of claims. In addition, candidates and client employees could assert claims against us. Possible claims include failure to maintain the confidentiality of the candidate’s employment search or for discrimination or other violations of the employment laws or malpractice. In various countries, we are subject to data protection laws impacting the processing of candidate information. We maintain professional liability insurance in amounts and coverage that we believe are adequate; however, we cannot guarantee that our insurance will cover all claims or that coverage will always be available. Significant uninsured liabilities could have a negative impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Our multinational operations may be adversely affected by social, political, legal and economic risks.

We generate substantial revenue outside the United States. We offer our services through offices in 40 countries around the world. We are exposed to the risk of changes in social, political, legal and economic conditions inherent in international operations, which could have a significant impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations. In particular, we conduct business in countries where the legal systems, local laws and trade practices are unsettled and evolving. Commercial laws in these countries are sometimes vague, arbitrary and inconsistently applied. Under these circumstances, it is difficult for us to determine at all times the exact requirements of such local laws. If we fail to comply with local laws, our business, financial condition and results of operations could suffer. In addition, the global nature of our operations poses challenges to our management, and financial and accounting systems. Failure to meet these challenges could seriously harm our business, financial condition and results of operations.

8

Table of Contents

A significant currency fluctuation between the U.S. dollar and other currencies could adversely impact our operating income.

With our operations in the Americas, Europe and Asia Pacific, we conduct business using various currencies. As we typically transact business in the local currency of our subsidiaries, our profitability may be impacted by the translation of foreign currency financial statements into U.S. dollars. Significant long-term fluctuations in relative currency values, in particular an increase in the value of the U.S. dollar against foreign currencies, could have an adverse effect on our profitability and financial condition.

We may not be able to align our cost structure with net revenue.

We must ensure that our costs and workforce continue to be in proportion to demand for our services. Failure to align our cost structure and headcount with net revenue could adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

Our net revenue may be affected by adverse economic conditions.

Periods of slowed economic activity, such as that currently being experienced, can adversely affect our net revenue. In particular, current volatility in the capital markets can affect our net revenue in the Financial Services industry group. If economic conditions fail to improve, our business, financial condition and results of operations could suffer.

The global financial crisis could adversely affect the financial position of our clients.

The ongoing financial crisis has tightened credit markets and lowered liquidity levels. Some of our clients may experience serious financial problems due to reduced access to credit and lower revenues resulting in their inability to meet their payment obligation to us.

We may not be able to generate sufficient profits to realize the benefit of our net deferred tax assets.

We establish valuation allowances against deferred tax assets when there is insufficient evidence that we will be able to realize the benefit of these deferred tax assets. We reassess the realizability of the deferred tax assets as facts and circumstances dictate. If after future assessments of the realizability of the deferred tax assets, we determine that a lesser or greater allowance is required, we record a reduction or increase to the income tax expense and the valuation allowance in the period of such determination.

Our inability to successfully integrate consultants hired through acquisitions may have an adverse effect on our business.

We may continue to grow through selective acquisitions, however, we may not be able to identify appropriate acquisition candidates, consummate acquisitions on satisfactory terms or integrate the acquired businesses effectively and profitably into our existing operations. Our future success will depend in part on our ability to complete the integration of acquisitions successfully into our operations. Failure to successfully integrate new employees and complementary businesses may adversely affect our profitability by creating operating inefficiencies that could increase operating expenses as a percentage of net revenues and reduce operating income. Further, after any acquisition, the acquired businesses’ clients may choose not to move their business to us causing an adverse affect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We may experience impairment of our goodwill and other intangible assets.

Periodically, we perform assessments of the carrying value of our goodwill and other intangible assets. In performing these assessments, we must make assumptions regarding the estimated fair value of our goodwill and other intangible assets. These assumptions include estimates of future market growth and trends, forecasted revenue and costs, capital investments, discount rates, and other variables. If the current weakened economic conditions continue to negatively impact our financial performance, we may fail to achieve our projected operating results and may need to record an impairment charge related to goodwill or other indefinite-lived intangible assets.

9

Table of Contents

Any resulting impairment loss could have an adverse impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We have anti-takeover provisions that make an acquisition of us difficult and expensive.

Anti-takeover provisions in our Certificate of Incorporation, our Bylaws and the Delaware laws make it difficult and expensive for someone to acquire us in a transaction which is not approved by our Board of Directors. Some of the provisions in our Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws include:

These provisions could discourage an acquisition attempt or other transaction in which stockholders could receive a premium over the current market price for the common stock.

Our ability to access additional credit could be limited.

In the current economic environment, banks can be expected to strictly enforce the terms of our credit agreement. Although we are currently in compliance with the financial covenants of our revolving credit facility, a further deterioration of economic conditions may negatively impact our business resulting in our failure to comply with these covenants in the future, which could limit our ability to borrow funds under our credit facility. In such circumstances, we may not be able to secure alternative financing or may only be able to do so at significantly higher costs.

ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

None.

ITEM 2. PROPERTIES

Our corporate headquarters is located in Chicago, Illinois. We have offices in major metropolitan areas in 40 countries around the world. All of our offices are leased. We do not own any real estate. The aggregate square footage of office space under lease was approximately 758,000 as of December 31, 2009. These office leases call for future minimum lease payments of approximately $203.6 million and have terms that expire between 2010 and 2024, exclusive of renewal options that we can exercise. Approximately 111,000 square feet of office space has been sublet to third parties.

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

We have contingent liabilities from various pending claims and litigation matters arising in the ordinary course of our business, some of which involve claims for damages that may be substantial in amount. Some of these matters are covered by insurance. Although our ultimate liability in these matters cannot be determined, based upon information currently available, we believe the ultimate resolution of such claims and litigation will not have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations or liquidity.

Contingencies

During the fourth quarter of 2005, a European country commenced a tax audit for the years 2001 through 2004, including an examination of our arrangement with professional service companies that provide consulting services to us. On November 24, 2006, the examining tax authority issued a final assessment in the amount for

10

Table of Contents

€4.3 million (equivalent to $6.1 million at December 31, 2009), consisting of unpaid withholding tax, plus unpaid Value Added Tax (“VAT”). No penalty was included in this assessment. We appealed this final assessment, and the enforcement of the assessment was suspended until a final determination of all appeals. We provided a bank guarantee to the tax authority in the amount of the final assessment plus post-assessment interest as required by local law. See Note 5, Restricted Cash and Note 21, Guarantees.

On March 4, 2009, we received notification that our appeal with respect to the withholding tax portion of the assessment had been decided in our favor, thereby canceling that assessment. On September 8, 2009, we were notified that the March 4, 2009 ruling was definitive and final. We have recovered approximately €4.1 million of the original €5.7 million bank guarantee related to the withholding tax appeal, and we are seeking to recover appeal-related expenses from the tax authority. On November 24, 2009, we received notification that our appeal with respect to the VAT portion of the assessment had been decided in our favor, thereby canceling that assessment. We are still waiting for the Court to notify us that the VAT ruling is definitive and final. The balance of the guarantee related to the VAT appeal (estimated at approximately €1.5 million) will remain in place pending receipt of the definitive and final ruling.

UK Employee Benefits Trust

On January 27, 2010, HM Revenue & Customs (“HMRC”) in the United Kingdom notified us that it was challenging the tax treatment of certain of our contributions in the United Kingdom to an Employee Benefits Trust (“EBT”) between 2002 and 2008. HMRC alleges that these contributions should have been subject to Pay As You Earn (“PAYE”) tax and Class 1 National Insurance Contributions (“NIC”) in the United Kingdom; and HMRC is proposing an adjustment to our payroll tax liability for the affected years. The aggregate amount of HMRC’s proposed adjustment is approximately £3.9 million (equivalent to $6.3 million at December 31, 2009). We have appealed the proposed adjustment. At this time, we believe that the likelihood of an unfavorable outcome with respect to the proposed adjustment is not probable and the potential amount of any loss cannot be reasonably estimated. We also believe that the amount of any final adjustment, if any, would not be material to our financial condition.

ITEM 4. RESERVED

11

Table of Contents

PART II

Market for Registrant’s Common Equity

Our common stock is listed on the Nasdaq Global Stock Market under the symbol “HSII.” The following table sets forth the high and low stock price per share of the common stock for the periods indicated, as reported on the Nasdaq Global Stock Market.

As of February 22, 2010, the last reported price on the Nasdaq Global Stock Market for our common stock was $29.09 per share, and there were 125 stockholders of record of the common stock.

12

Table of Contents

Performance Graph

We have presented below a graph which compares the cumulative total stockholder return on our common shares with the cumulative total stockholder return of the Standard & Poor’s SmallCap 600 Index and the Standard & Poor’s Composite 1500 Human Resource and Employment Services Index. Cumulative total return for each of the periods shown in the performance graph is measured assuming an initial investment of $100 on December 31, 2004.

The stock price performance depicted in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future price performance. This graph will not be deemed to be filed as part of this Form 10-K and will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference by any general statement incorporating this Form 10-K into any filing by us under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except to the extent we specifically incorporate this information by reference.

Comparison of Five-Year Cumulative Total Return*

Comparison is among Heidrick & Struggles, the S&P SmallCap 600 Index and the S&P Composite 1500 Human Resource & Employment Services Index. The S&P Composite 1500 Human Resource & Employment Services Index includes 13 companies in related businesses, including Heidrick & Struggles.

Dividends

Since September 2007, we have paid a quarterly cash dividend of $0.13 per share as approved by our Board of Directors. In 2009, the total cash dividend paid was $0.52 per share.

13

Table of Contents

The following table outlines the record date, payment date and amount of quarterly cash dividends paid during 2008 and 2009:

Cash dividends payable of $2.2 million related to the fourth quarter 2009 cash dividend, which was paid in the first quarter of 2010, and cash dividends payable of $2.1 million related to the fourth quarter 2008 cash dividend, which was paid in the first quarter of 2009, are accrued in the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.

In connection with the quarterly cash dividend, we also pay a dividend equivalent on outstanding restricted stock units. The amounts related to the dividend equivalent payments for restricted stock units are accrued over the vesting period and paid upon vesting. In 2009 and 2008, we paid $0.6 million and $0.2 million, respectively, in dividend equivalent payments.

Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

The following table provides information related to our purchase of common shares for the quarter ended December 31, 2009. For further information of our share repurchase activity, see “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Liquidity and Capital Resources.”

On May 24, 2006, our Board of Directors authorized management to repurchase shares of our common stock with an aggregate purchase price up to $50 million. We purchased 1,132,073 shares of our common stock for $50 million under the May 2006 authorization, which was completed during the third quarter of 2007.

On May 24, 2007, our Board of Directors authorized management to repurchase shares of our common stock with an aggregate purchase price up to $50 million. We purchased 1,403,738 shares of our common stock for $50 million under the May 2007 authorization, which was completed during the first quarter of 2008.

14

Table of Contents

On February 8, 2008, our Board of Directors authorized management to repurchase shares of our common stock with an aggregate purchase price up to $50 million. We intend from time to time and as business conditions warrant, to purchase shares of our common stock on the open market or in negotiated or block trades. No time limit has been set for completion of this program. As of December 31, 2008, we purchased 951,160 shares of our common stock under the February 2008 authorization for a total of $27.2 million. As of December 31, 2009 and 2008, $22.8 million remains available under this authorization.

15

Table of Contents

ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

The selected financial data presented below have been derived from our audited consolidated financial statements. The data as of December 31, 2009 and 2008 and for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007 are derived from the audited current and historical consolidated financial statements, which are included elsewhere in this Form 10-K. The data as of December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005 and for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005 are derived from audited historical consolidated financial statements, which are not included in this report. The data set forth is qualified in its entirety by, and should be read in conjunction with, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” the audited consolidated financial statements, the notes thereto, and the other financial data and statistical information included in this Form 10-K.

16

Table of Contents

Notes to Selected Financial Data:

17

Table of Contents

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations as well as other sections of this annual report on Form 10-K contain forward-looking statements. The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 provides a safe harbor for forward-looking statements. The forward-looking statements are based on current expectations, estimates, forecasts and projections about the industry in which we operate and management’s beliefs and assumptions. Forward-looking statements may be identified by the use of words such as “expects,” “anticipates,” “intends,” “plans,” “believes,” “seeks,” “estimates,” “projects,” “forecasts,” and similar expressions. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve certain known and unknown risks, uncertainties and assumptions that are difficult to predict. Actual outcomes and results may differ materially from what is expressed, forecasted or implied in the forward-looking statements. Factors that may affect the outcome of the forward-looking statements include, among other things, our ability to attract and retain qualified executive search consultants; further declines in the global economy and our ability to execute successfully through business cycles; the timing, speed or robustness of any future economic recovery; increased collectibility risk due to financial performance of our clients; social or political instability in markets where we operate, the impact of foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations; price competition; the ability to forecast, on a quarterly basis, variable compensation accruals that ultimately are determined based on the achievement of annual results; our ability to realize our tax loss carryforwards; the timing of the establishment or reversal of valuation allowance on deferred tax assets; the mix of profit and loss by country; an impairment of our goodwill and other intangible assets; delays in the development and/or implementation of new technology and systems; and the ability to meet and achieve the expected savings resulting from cost-reduction initiatives and restructuring activities. For more information on the factors that could affect the outcome of forward-looking statements, see Risk Factors in Item 1A of this Form 10-K. We caution the reader that the list of factors may not be exhaustive. We undertake no obligation to update publicly any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

Executive Overview

Our Business

We are a premier leadership advisory firm providing executive search and leadership consulting services. We help our clients build leadership teams by facilitating the recruitment, management and deployment of senior executives. Focusing on top-level services offers us several advantages that include access to and influence with key decision makers, increased potential for recurring search consulting engagements, higher fees per search, enhanced brand visibility, and leveraged global footprint, which create added barriers to entry for potential competitors. Working at the top of client organizations also allows us to attract and retain high-caliber consultants.

In addition to executive search, we provide a range of leadership consulting services to clients. These services include succession planning, executive assessment, talent retention management, executive development, transition consulting for newly appointed executives, and M&A human capital integration consulting.

We provide our services to a broad range of clients through the expertise of 359 consultants located in 40 countries throughout the world as of December 31, 2009. Our executive search services are provided on a retained basis. Revenue before reimbursements of out-of-pocket expenses (“net revenue”) consists of retainers and indirect expenses billed to clients. Typically, we are paid a retainer for our executive search services equal to approximately one-third of the estimated first year compensation for the position to be filled. In addition, if the actual compensation of a placed candidate exceeds the estimated compensation, we often are authorized to bill the client for one-third of the excess. Indirect expenses are calculated as a percentage of the retainer with certain dollar limits per search.

18

Table of Contents

Key Performance Indicators

We manage and assess Heidrick & Struggles’ performance through various means, with the primary financial and operational measures including net revenue growth, operating income, operating margin, consultant headcount, confirmation trends, consultant productivity, and average revenue per executive search.

Revenue growth is driven by a combination of an increase in executive search wins and leadership consulting projects, higher consultant productivity, higher average revenue per search or project and the hiring of additional consultants. With the exception of compensation expense, incremental increases in revenue do not necessarily result in proportional increases in costs, particularly operating and administrative expenses, thus potentially improving operating margins.

The number of consultants, confirmation trends, number of searches or projects completed, productivity levels and the average revenue per executive search will vary from quarter to quarter, affecting revenue growth and operating margin.

Our Compensation Model

At the consultant level, individuals are largely rewarded for their performance based on a system that directly ties a significant portion of their compensation to the amount of net revenue for which they are responsible. Credit towards the variable portion of a consultant’s compensation is earned by generating net revenue for winning and executing work. Each quarter, we review and update the expected annual performance of all consultants and accrue variable compensation accordingly. The amount of variable compensation that is accrued for each consultant is based on a tiered payout model. The more net revenue that is generated by the consultant, the higher the percentage credited towards the consultant’s variable compensation and thus accrued by our company as expense. The mix of individual consultants who generate the revenue can significantly affect the total amount of compensation expense recorded and thus operating margins. This bonus is discretionary and is based on company-wide profitability targets approved by the Human Resources and Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors. As a result, the variable portion of the compensation expense may fluctuate significantly from quarter to quarter.

In 2008, we changed the deferral arrangement of bonuses for consultants and management globally. The portion of the bonus previously deferred into restricted stock units was changed into deferred cash, which is paid ratably over a three-year period. A premium of 10% was applied to the bonus amount deferred in 2008. The portion of the bonus that is deferred varies between 10% and 15% depending on the employee’s level or position. The compensation expense related to the amounts being deferred is recognized on a graded vesting attribution method over the requisite service period, which for 2008, began on January 1, 2008 and will continue through the final payment date in March 2012. For 2008, the deferral date was in the first quarter of 2009.

In 2009, we continued with the bonus cash deferral arrangement for consultants only but did not apply a premium to the amount deferred in 2009. The compensation expense related to the amounts being deferred is recognized on a graded vesting attribution method over the requisite service period, which for 2009, began on January 1, 2009 and will continue through the final payment date in March 2013. For 2009, the deferral date is in the first quarter of 2010. These amounts are recorded in accrued salaries and employee benefits and other non-current liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. We will continue to grant restricted stock units under other existing programs.

2009 Overview

Consolidated net revenue of $395.7 million decreased 35.8% or $220.3 million in 2009, compared to 2008. Net revenue declined 35.9% in the Americas, 40.7% in Europe and 25.3% in Asia Pacific. Consultant productivity measured by net revenue per consultant was $1.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2009 compared to $1.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2008. Average revenue per executive search was $101,000 for the year ended December 31, 2009 compared to $122,600 for the year ended December 31, 2008.

19

Table of Contents

Operating loss as a percentage of net revenue was 6.8% in 2009 compared to operating income as a percentage of net revenue of 9.0% in 2008 primarily as a result of a decrease in net revenue of 35.8% and restructuring and impairment charges of $26.7 million, offset by decreases in salaries and employee benefits expense of 35.3%, general and administrative expenses of 7.4% and other operating income of $1.7 million. Salaries and employee benefits expense as a percentage of net revenue increased from 70.7% in 2008 to 71.2% in 2009. General and administrative expenses as a percentage of net revenue increased from 20.3% in 2008 to 29.3% in 2009.

We ended the year with a combined cash and cash equivalents balance of $123.0 million, a decrease of $111.5 million compared to a combined cash and cash equivalents balance of $234.5 million at December 31, 2008. We pay the majority of bonuses in the first quarter following the year in which they were earned. Employee bonuses are accrued throughout the year and are based on the Company’s performance and the performance of the individual employee. In early 2010, we expect to pay approximately $47 million related to the 2009 bonus accruals.

2010 Outlook

We are currently forecasting 2010 net revenue of between $440 million and $480 million and an operating margin of between 4 and 6 percent, for the year ending December 31, 2010. However, continued macroeconomic uncertainty and volatility in the capital markets necessarily mean that our current forecasts could change materially during 2010.

Results of Operations

The following table summarizes, for the periods indicated, the results of operations (in thousands):

20

Table of Contents

The following table summarizes, for the periods indicated, our selected statements of operations data as a percentage of revenue before reimbursements (net revenue):

We operate our executive search and leadership consulting services in three geographic regions: the Americas; Europe, which includes the Middle East and Africa; and Asia Pacific.

For segment purposes, reimbursements of out-of-pocket expenses classified as revenue and restructuring and impairment charges are reported separately and, therefore, are not included in the results of each geographic region. We believe that analyzing trends in revenue before reimbursements (net revenue), analyzing operating expenses as a percentage of net revenue, and operating income (loss) excluding restructuring and impairment charges and other operating income more appropriately reflects our core operations. By segment, the restructuring and impairment charges recorded in 2009 were $13.3 million in the Americas, $9.5 million in Europe, $2.4 million in Asia Pacific and $1.5 million in Corporate. The other operating income of $1.7 million was recorded in the European region.

21

Table of Contents

The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, our revenue and operating income (loss) by segment (in thousands):

2009 Compared to 2008

Total revenue.    Consolidated total revenue decreased $230.1 million, or 35.7%, to $414.7 million in 2009 from $644.9 million in 2008. The decrease in total revenue was due to the decrease in revenue before reimbursements (net revenue).

Revenue before reimbursements (net revenue).    Consolidated net revenue decreased $220.3 million, or 35.8%, to $395.7 million in 2009 from $615.9 million in 2008. The negative impact of exchange rate fluctuations resulted in approximately 3 percentage points of the decline in 2009. Net revenue declined in all regions and industry groups. In 2009, the number of confirmed executive searches decreased 24.1% to 3,651 from 4,812 in 2008. The number of consultants decreased to 359 as of December 31, 2009 compared to 419 as of December 31, 2008. Productivity, as measured by annualized net revenue per consultant, decreased to $1.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2009 from $1.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2008, and average revenue per executive search decreased to $101,000 for the year ended December 31, 2009 compared to $122,600 for the year ended December 31, 2008.

Net revenue in the Americas was $201.5 million in 2009, a decrease of $112.9 million, or 35.9% from $314.4 million in 2008. The negative impact of exchange rate fluctuations in Canada and Latin America resulted in less than 1 percentage point of the decline in 2009. Net revenue in Europe was $119.4 million in 2009, a decrease of $82.0 million, or 40.7% from $201.5 million in 2008. The negative impact of exchange rate fluctuations resulted in approximately 6 percentage points of the decline in 2009. Net revenue in Asia Pacific was $74.7 million in 2009, a decrease of $25.4 million, or 25.3% from $100.0 million in 2008. The negative impact of exchange rate fluctuations resulted in approximately 2 percentage points of the decline in 2009.

Salaries and employee benefits.    Consolidated salaries and employee benefits expense decreased $153.8 million, or 35.3%, to $281.5 million in 2009 from $435.3 million in 2008. The decrease in salaries and employee

22

Table of Contents

benefits expense is primarily a result of a $105.9 million decrease in performance-related compensation expense related to lower net revenue and operating margin in 2009. Additionally, fixed compensation expense decreased by $47.9 million primarily related to the two workforce reductions, base salary reductions and a decrease in severance expense of $3.8 million in 2009 as compared to 2008. At December 31, 2009 we had 1,400 total employees, down 20.0% compared to 1,751 total employees at December 31, 2008.

As a percentage of net revenue, salaries and employee benefits expense increased to 71.2% in 2009 from 70.7% in 2008. Although we implemented various cost savings initiatives in 2009, this percentage increase reflects a more rapid decline in our revenue than the reductions in our cost structure. Excluding a positive impact of $11.4 million due to exchange rate fluctuations, which we believe provides a better comparison of operational performance, consolidated salaries and employee benefits expense decreased by approximately 32.7% versus 35.3% as reported in 2009 compared to 2008.

General and administrative expenses.    Consolidated general and administrative expenses decreased $9.3 million, or 7.4%, to $115.8 million in 2009 from $125.1 million in 2008. The decrease primarily reflects savings of $12.5 million associated with cost containment initiatives, a $2.6 million decrease in bad debt expense and a $1.4 million decrease in premise related costs. The decrease was partially offset by higher fees for professional services of $6.4 million of which $5.1 million is related to a process improvement project aimed at increasing operational effectiveness and efficiency. Additionally, we wrote-off $0.8 million of costs related to a software development project and $0.4 million of software and maintenance agreement costs associated with VisualCV, Inc. during 2009. Infrastructure and other operating expenses increased by $0.8 million in 2009 as compared to 2008.

As a percentage of net revenue, general and administrative expenses increased to 29.3% in 2009 from 20.3% in 2008. Although we implemented various cost savings initiatives in 2009, this percentage increase reflects a more rapid decline in our revenue than the reductions in our cost structure. Excluding a positive impact of $4.7 million due to exchange rate fluctuations, which we believe provides a better comparison of operational performance, consolidated general and administrative expenses decreased by approximately 3.7% versus 7.4% as reported in 2009 compared to 2008.

Restructuring and impairment charges.    In 2009, we recorded restructuring charges of $22.9 million in connection with initiatives to reduce overall costs and improve operational efficiencies. These charges relate to severance and other employee-related costs associated with reductions in our workforce of 363 employees globally and included 75 executive search consultants. By segment, the restructuring charges recorded in 2009 were $9.5 million in the Americas, $9.5 million in Europe, $2.4 million in Asia Pacific and $1.5 million in Corporate. Additionally, during 2009 we recorded an adjustment of $0.3 million in Europe related to a previously restructured office. As a result of our workforce reductions in January and May 2009 and continued business and economic uncertainty, we performed an evaluation of the remaining client relationship intangible asset associated with our 2006 acquisition of Highland Partners. Based on this analysis, we recorded an impairment charge related to the Americas region of $3.8 million in 2009. Additionally, we recorded an impairment charge of $0.2 million on our client relationship asset associated with our acquisition of Ray and Berndtson Sp. z o. o.

Other operating income.    As a result of significantly lower than expected 2009 revenue production from consultants acquired in the Ray and Berndtson Sp. z o. o acquisition and uncertainty regarding their future performance, we performed a fair value assessment of the potential future earnout payments under the purchase agreement. This assessment resulted in a €1.1 million (equivalent to $1.7 million at December 31, 2009) reduction to the original earnout accrual. Under the purchase method of accounting for business combinations, we recognized the fair value adjustment as other operating income in the Consolidated Statement of Operations.

Operating income (loss).    Our consolidated operating loss was $26.7 million in 2009 compared to operating income of $55.5 million in 2008. The operating loss is primarily due to a decrease in net revenue of $220.3 million and restructuring and impairment charges of $26.7 million, offset by decreases in salaries and

23

Table of Contents

employee benefits expense of $153.8 million, general and administrative expenses of $9.3 million, and other operating income of $1.7 million. The reductions made to salaries and employee benefits and continued savings in general and administrative expenses did not keep pace with the sharp decline in net revenue.

For segment purposes, restructuring and impairment charges and other operating income are not included in operating income (loss) by geographic region. We believe that analyzing trends in operating income (loss) excluding restructuring and impairment charges and other operating income more appropriately reflects our core operations.

Each region experienced significant declines in revenue partially offset by a decrease in salary and employee benefits expense and general and administrative expenses. The decrease in salaries and employee benefits expense is due to a decrease in performance-related compensation expense due to lower net revenue and operating margin for 2009, a decrease in fixed salaries related to the workforce and salary reductions in 2009 and lower search support staff costs. The decrease in general and administrative expenses is due to cost containment initiatives including a reduction in travel expenses offset by higher fees for professional services in 2009 compared to 2008.

In the Americas, operating income decreased $27.3 million to $18.5 million in 2009 compared to $45.8 million in 2008. The decrease is due to lower net revenue of $112.9 million offset by an $82.0 million decrease in salaries and employee benefits expense and a $3.6 million decrease in general and administrative expenses.

In Europe, operating income decreased $21.8 million to $2.7 million in 2009 compared to $24.5 million in 2008. The decrease is due to lower net revenue of $82.0 million offset by a $51.5 million decrease in salaries and employee benefits expense and an $8.7 million decrease in general and administrative expenses.

In Asia Pacific, operating income decreased $5.8 million to $9.5 million in 2009 compared to $15.3 million in 2008. The decrease is due to lower net revenue of $25.4 million offset by a $17.5 million decrease in salaries and employee benefits expense and a $2.1 million decrease in general and administrative expenses.

Corporate expenses increased $2.3 million in 2009 to $32.4 million from $30.1 million in 2008. The increase was primarily the result of a $5.1 million increase in general and administrative expenses, offset by a $2.8 million decrease in compensation expense. The $5.1 million increase in general and administrative expense is due to a $6.1 million increase in professional service fees offset by $1.0 million of cost containment initiatives and other operating and infrastructure expenses. The increase in professional service fees is primarily related to a process improvement project aimed at increasing operational effectiveness and efficiency. Additionally, we wrote off $0.8 million of costs related to a software development project. The $2.8 million decrease in compensation expense is primarily due to a reduction in performance-related compensation expense related to lower net revenue and operating margin for 2009. The savings were offset by a $0.5 million write-off of capitalized salaries expense related to a software development project.

Net non-operating income (expense).    Net non-operating expense was $3.0 million in 2009 compared to net non-operating income $6.7 million in 2008.

Net interest income in 2009 was $1.2 million, compared to $5.1 million in 2008. The decrease in net interest income as compared to 2008 is due to a lower cash balance and lower interest rates.

Net other non-operating expense was $4.2 million in 2009, compared to net other non-operating income of $1.6 million in 2008. The 2009 non-operating loss primarily reflects the write-off of our investment in VisualCV, Inc. of $3.0 million. The 2008 non-operating income primarily reflects $1.0 million resulting from the recognition of previously capitalized exchange gains due to our 2008 sale of the Portugal business. The remaining other non-operating income (expense) in 2009 and 2008 consists of realized and unrealized gains and losses on our cost and equity method investments and exchange gains and losses on cash and intercompany balances, which are denominated in currencies other than the functional currency and are not considered permanent in nature.

24

Table of Contents

Income taxes.    In 2009, we reported a loss before taxes of $29.7 million and recorded an income tax benefit of $8.8 million. Our effective income tax benefit rate for 2009 was 29.6%.

In 2008, we reported income before taxes of $62.3 million and recorded an income tax provision of $23.2 million. The effective tax rate for 2008 was 37.2%.

2008 Compared to 2007

Total revenue.    Consolidated total revenue decreased $3.4 million, or 0.5%, to $644.9 million in 2008 from $648.3 million in 2007. The decrease in total revenue was due to the decrease in revenue before reimbursements (net revenue).

Revenue before reimbursements (net revenue).    Consolidated net revenue decreased $3.8 million, or 0.6%, to $615.9 million in 2008 from $619.7 million in 2007. The positive impact of exchange rate fluctuations offset the decrease by approximately one percentage point in 2008. Net revenue increased in the Asia Pacific region but was more than offset by declines in net revenue in the Americas and European regions in 2008. Revenue growth achieved by the Technology, Life Sciences, Industrial, Education and Social Enterprise, and Business and Professional Services industry practice groups partially offset declines in the Financial Services and Consumer practice groups. In 2008, the number of confirmed executive searches decreased 5.7% to 4,812 from 5,102 in 2007. The number of consultants increased to 419 as of December 31, 2008 compared to 386 as of December 31, 2007. Productivity, as measured by annualized revenue per consultant, decreased to $1.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2008 from $1.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2007, while the average revenue per executive search increased to $122,600 for the year ended December 31, 2008 compared to $114,900 for the year ended December 31, 2007.

Net revenue in the Americas was $314.4 million in 2008, a decrease of $19.2 million, or 5.7%, from $333.6 million in 2007. The Technology, Education and Social Enterprise and Life Sciences industry groups achieved year-over-year net revenue growth, but this growth only partially offset declines in the other industry groups. The positive impact of exchange rate fluctuations in Canada and Latin America offset the decrease by less than one percentage point in 2008. Net revenue in Europe was $201.5 million in 2008, a decrease of $6.0 million, or 2.9%, from $207.5 million in 2007. The Consumer, Life Sciences, Technology, Industrial and Education and Social Enterprise industry groups achieved net revenue growth compared to 2007, but this growth was more than offset by declines in the Financial Services and Business and Professional Services industry groups. The positive impact of exchange rate fluctuations offset the decrease in net revenue by approximately one percentage point in 2008. In Asia Pacific, net revenue was $100.0 million in 2008, an increase of $21.4 million, or 27.3%, from $78.6 million in 2007. The positive impact of exchange rate fluctuations resulted in an increase in revenue of approximately 4 percentage points year over year. Every industry group in this region achieved net revenue growth, but the Industrial, Financial Services, and Business and Professional Services industry groups were the primary drivers of growth for 2008.

Salaries and employee benefits.    Consolidated salaries and employee benefits expense increased $16.4 million, or 3.9%, to $435.3 million in 2008 from $419.0 million in 2007. The increase in salaries and employee benefits expense was primarily a result of $11.1 million in higher fixed salary expense for search support staff and $2.1 million in severance costs, offset by a $1.8 million decrease in other salaries and employee benefits-related expenses. Stock-based compensation expense also increased $5.0 million year over year, as a result of 2008 being the first year in which we incurred the cumulative three year impact of the previously deferred restricted stock unit bonus awards.

As a percentage of net revenue, salaries and employee benefits expense increased to 70.7% in 2008 from 67.6% in 2007. Excluding a negative impact of $3.1 million due to exchange rate fluctuations, which we believe provides a better comparison of operational performance, consolidated salaries and employee benefits expense decreased by approximately 3% versus 4% as reported in 2008 compared to 2007.

25

Table of Contents

General and administrative expenses.    Consolidated general and administrative expenses increased $3.9 million, or 3.2%, to $125.1 million in 2008 from $121.2 million in 2007. The increase was primarily related to $6.5 million of premise-related costs for new offices and lease renewals for existing offices and a $3.7 million increase in bad debt expense, offset by a $0.5 million decrease in other infrastructure and operating expenses. The net increases were partially offset by several items recorded in 2007 that did not recur in 2008, including $2.7 million of legal costs incurred for litigation related to our hiring of certain Whitney Group consultants in the Asia Pacific region, fees for professional services of $2.1 million related to certain consulting assignments in Europe that required third party expertise, and $1.0 million of expense related to the impairment of a client relationship intangible asset.

As a percentage of net revenue, general and administrative expenses increased to 20.3% in 2008 from 19.6% in 2007. Exchange rate fluctuations had a minimal impact on general and administrative expenses for the year ended December 31, 2008 compared to the year ended December 31, 2007.

Operating income.    Our consolidated operating income was $55.5 million in 2008 compared to $79.5 million in 2007 a decrease of 30.1%. The decrease in consolidated operating income of $24.0 million was primarily due to increases in salaries and benefits expense of $16.4 million and in general and administrative expenses of $3.9 million and a decrease in revenue of $3.8 million.

In the Americas, operating income decreased $21.7 million to $45.8 million in 2008 from $67.5 million in 2007. The decrease was due to lower net revenue of $19.2 million and increases in general and administrative expenses of $3.0 million, offset by a decrease in salaries and employee benefits expense of $0.5 million. The increase in general and administrative expenses primarily relates to a $3.6 million increase in premise related expenses and lease renewals for existing offices primarily in New York and an increase in bad debt expense of $0.9 million, offset by a $1.0 million impairment of a client relationship intangible asset in 2007. The increase in salaries and employee benefits expense was primarily related to higher fixed salaries for associates and search support staff.

In Europe, operating income decreased $7.4 million in 2008, to $24.5 million, from $31.9 million in 2007. The decrease was due to lower net revenue of $6.0 million and an increase in general and administrative expenses of $2.0 million offset by a decrease in salaries and employee benefits expense of $0.6 million. The increase in general and administrative expenses primarily reflects a $2.4 million increase in bad debt expenses, a $0.3 million increase in premise-related costs and a $1.4 million increase in other operating and infrastructure expenses offset by $2.1 million in professional services fees related to certain consulting assignments which required third party expertise in 2007. The decrease in salaries and employee benefits expense was due a decrease in performance-related compensation expense due to lower net revenue and operating margin levels partially offset by higher fixed salaries for search support staff and stock-based compensation expense. Severance-related expenses decreased by $1.1 million during 2008 as compared to 2007.

In Asia Pacific, operating income was $15.3 million in 2008, a decrease of $0.6 million, compared to $15.9 million in 2007. The decrease in operating income was a result of increases of $19.0 million in salaries and employee benefits expense and $3.0 million in general and administrative expenses offset by higher net revenue of $21.4 million. The increase in salaries and employee benefits expense represents planned investments to grow the region, including a 16.9% increase in year-over-year headcount, $3.2 million of increased year-over-year sign-on bonus expense and amortization of other minimum guarantee bonuses, $1.9 million of increased stock-based compensation expense and $1.9 million of increased support staff leverage costs. The increase in general and administrative expenses was primarily due to increased infrastructure costs of $3.4 million related to new and existing offices. The remaining increase was due to higher general spending resulting from overall growth in the region in 2008 as compared to 2007, offset by $2.7 million of expense incurred in 2007 for litigation related to our hiring of certain Whitney Group consultants in the region.

26

Table of Contents

Corporate expenses decreased $5.7 million in 2008, to $30.1 million from $35.8 million in 2007. The decrease was primarily the result of a $4.3 million decrease in general and administrative expenses and a $1.4 million decrease in compensation expense. The decrease in general and administrative expenses was due to lower professional services expenses and lower travel and entertainment-related expenses in 2008 due to cost containment initiatives and also reflects the absence of $2.5 million in costs related to the worldwide consultants’ meeting that was held in the second quarter of 2007. The decrease in compensation-related expenses was primarily due to lower fixed salary expense.

Net non-operating income.    Net non-operating income decreased $0.9 million in 2008 to $6.7 million compared to $7.6 million in 2007.

Net interest income in 2008 was $5.1 million, compared to $8.0 million for 2007. The decrease in net interest income as compared to 2007 is due to lower investment balances and lower interest rates.

Net other non-operating income was $1.6 million in 2008, compared to net other non-operating expense of $0.4 million in 2007. As a result of the sale of our Portugal business during the second quarter, we recognized previously capitalized exchange gains, which resulted in other non-operating income of $1.0 million. The remaining non-operating income of $0.6 million primarily consists of exchange gains and losses on cash and intercompany balances, which are denominated in currencies other than the functional currency and are not considered permanent in nature.

Income taxes.    In 2008, we reported income before taxes of $62.3 million and recorded an income tax provision of $23.2 million. The effective tax rate for 2008 was 37.2%.

In 2007, we reported income before taxes of $87.1 million and recorded an income tax provision of $30.7 million. The effective tax rate for 2007 was 35.2%. This rate reflects a benefit of $7.3 million associated with the reversal of valuation allowance on foreign tax credits.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

General.    We continually evaluate our liquidity requirements, capital needs and availability of capital resources based on our operating needs. We believe that our existing cash balances together with the funds expected to be generated from operations and funds available under our committed revolving credit facility will be sufficient to finance our operations for the foreseeable future, as well as to finance the cash payments associated with our restructuring charges and cash dividends.

We pay the non-deferred portion of annual bonuses in the first quarter following the year in which they are earned. Employee bonuses are accrued throughout the year and are based on our performance and the performance of the individual employee.

In 2008, we changed the deferral arrangement of bonuses for consultants and management globally. The portion of the bonus previously deferred into restricted stock units was changed into deferred cash, which is paid ratably over a three-year period. A premium of 10% was applied to the bonus amount deferred in 2008. The portion of the bonus that is deferred varies between 10% and 15% depending on the employee’s level or position. The compensation expense related to the amounts being deferred is recognized on a graded vesting attribution method over the requisite service period, which for 2008, began on January 1, 2008 and will continue through the final payment date in March 2012. For 2008, the deferral date was in the first quarter of 2009.

In 2009, we continued with the bonus cash deferral arrangement for consultants only but did not apply a premium to the amount deferred in 2009. The compensation expense related to the amounts being deferred is recognized on a graded vesting attribution method over the requisite service period, which for 2009, began on January 1, 2009 and will continue through the final payment date in March 2013. For 2009, the deferral date is in the first quarter of 2010. These amounts are recorded in accrued salaries and employee benefits and other non-current liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. We will continue to grant restricted stock units under other existing programs.

27

Table of Contents

Lines of credit.    Since October 2006, we have had a committed unsecured revolving credit facility (the “Facility”). As a result of the restructuring charge recorded in the first quarter of 2009, we were not in compliance with one of the financial covenants of the Facility at March 31, 2009. We entered into an amendment (the “Amendment”) to the Facility. Among other things, the Amendment amended the pricing grid contained in the definition of “Applicable Rate” set forth in the Facility to better reflect prevailing market rates applicable to loans extended under the financial tests set forth therein, amended the definition of “Commitment” to reduce the aggregate commitment of the lenders from $100 million to $75 million, amended the definition of EBITDA and EBITDAR as they relate to the financial covenants, waived compliance with one of the financial covenants for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2009, and amended one of the financial covenants for 2009.

Under the Facility, we may borrow U.S. dollars, euros, or other major traded currencies as agreed by the banks. Borrowings under the Facility bear interest at the existing Alternate Base Rate or LIBOR plus a spread as determined by our leverage ratio. A facility fee is charged even if no portion of the Facility is used. The Facility expires in October 2011.

There were no borrowings outstanding under the Facility at December 31, 2009 or 2008, nor were there any borrowings during the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008. During 2009 and 2008, we were in compliance with the financial covenants of the Facility and no event of default existed.

Cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments.    Cash and cash equivalents at December 31, 2009 were $123.0 million, a decrease of $111.5 million compared to $234.5 million at December 31, 2008. We expect to pay approximately $47 million in bonuses in early 2010.

Certain reclassifications have been made to prior year financial information to conform to current year presentations, which have no effect on the Consolidated Statements of Operations for any prior periods presented.

Cash from operating activities.    In 2009, cash used in operating activities was $72.7 million, principally reflecting our net loss of $20.9 million, cash bonus payments and the associated payroll taxes of approximately $127 million and restructuring payments of $25.0 million.

In 2008, cash provided by operating activities was $51.3 million, principally reflecting our net income of $39.1 million and other non-cash charges offset by decreases in accrued expenses, income taxes recoverable and other assets and liabilities.

In 2007, cash provided by operating activities was $112.9 million, principally reflecting our net income plus an increase in bonus related accruals and other non-cash charges, less the payment of cash bonuses of approximately $98 million in March 2007.

Cash from investing activities.    Cash used in investing activities was $23.9 million in 2009, primarily due to acquisition earn-out payments of $12.8 million, the Ray & Berndtson Sp z o.o acquisition of $2.6 million, capital expenditures of $12.3 million and $1.3 million related to the second payment associated with our 2008 purchase of an equity method investment.

Cash used in investing activities was $6.6 million in 2008, primarily as a result of cash paid for acquisitions of $14.8 million, capital expenditures of $13.4 million, and purchases of cost and equity method investments of $2.8 million, offset by net proceeds from sales of short-term investments of $22.3 million and proceeds from the sale of a business of $1.6 million.

Cash provided by investing activities was $38.1 million in 2007, primarily as a result of net proceeds from sales and purchases of short-term investments of $51.1 million offset by capital expenditures of $8.0 million, $2.2 million for the purchase of a cost method investment, $1.3 million paid in connection with the acquisition of RentonJames and a $1.8 million increase in restricted cash.

28

Table of Contents

Capital expenditures were $12.3 million, $13.4 million, and $8.0 million in 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively. Capital expenditures in 2009 were primarily related to the consolidation and relocation of our New York and London offices and ongoing capital expenditures. We anticipate that our capital expenditures for 2010 will be approximately $25.5 million to $28.0 million, which primarily reflects office build outs in London, Chicago, Paris and Washington D.C. and investments in a new IT search system, as well as ongoing capital expenditures.

Cash from financing activities.    Cash used in financing activities in 2009 was $11.5 million primarily due to $9.3 million of quarterly cash dividends to shareholders and $3.4 million of payments for employee tax withholdings on equity transactions offset by $1.2 million of proceeds from stock options exercised during the year.

Cash used in financing activities in 2008 was $64.7 million primarily as a result of repurchasing $48.1 million of our common stock, $8.8 million of quarterly cash dividends to shareholders and $8.8 million of payments for employee tax withholdings on equity transactions offset by $0.9 million of proceeds from stock options exercised during the year.

Cash used in financing activities in 2007 was $47.7 million primarily as a result of the repurchase of $67.8 million of our common stock and $2.3 million of quarterly cash dividends to shareholders and $5.0 million of payments for employee tax withholdings on equity transactions, offset by $19.4 million of proceeds from stock options exercised during the year and $8.0 million of tax benefits associated with the exercise or vesting of equity awards.

On May 24, 2006, our Board of Directors authorized management to repurchase shares of our common stock with an aggregate total amount up to $50 million. We purchased 1,132,073 shares of our common stock for $50 million under the May 2006 authorization, which was completed during the third quarter of 2007.

On May 24, 2007, our Board of Directors authorized management to repurchase shares of our common stock with an aggregate total amount up to $50 million. We purchased 1,403,738 shares of our common stock for $50 million under the May 2007 authorization, which was completed during the first quarter of 2008.

On February 8, 2008, our Board of Directors authorized management to repurchase shares of our common stock with an aggregate total amount up to $50 million. We intend from time to time and as business conditions warrant, to purchase shares of our common stock on the open market or in negotiated or block trades. No time limit has been set for completion of this program. As of December 31, 2008, we purchased 951,160 shares of our common stock under the February 2008 authorization for a total of $27.2 million. As of December 31, 2009 and 2008, $22.8 million remains available under this authorization.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements.    We do not have material off-balance sheet arrangements, special purpose entities, trading activities of non-exchange traded contracts or transactions with related parties.

Contractual obligations.    The following table presents our known contractual obligations as of December 31, 2009 and the expected timing of cash payments related to these contractual obligations (in millions):

29

Table of Contents

In addition to the contractual obligations included in the above table, we have liabilities related to certain employee benefit plans. These liabilities are recorded in our Consolidated Balance Sheet at December 31, 2009. The obligations related to these employee benefit plans are described in Note 13, Employee Benefit Plans, and Note 14, Pension Plan and Life Insurance Contract. As the timing of cash disbursements related to these employee benefit plans is uncertain, we have not included these obligations in the above table. The table excludes our liability for uncertain tax positions including accrued interest and penalties, which totaled $4.8 million as of January 1, 2009 and $4.5 million as of December 31, 2009, since we cannot predict with reasonable reliability the timing of cash settlements to the respective taxing authorities.

Subsequent Developments

In January 2010, HM Revenue & Customs (“HMRC”) in the United Kingdom notified us that it was challenging the tax treatment of certain contributions the United Kingdom had made to an Employee Benefit Trust (“EBT”). See Item 3, Legal Proceedings, for a discussion of the legal proceedings.

Application of Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

General.    Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations is based upon our Consolidated Financial Statements, which have been prepared using accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP). Our significant accounting policies are discussed in Note 2, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. The preparation of these financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. Management bases its estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. If actual amounts are ultimately different from previous estimates, the revisions are included in our results of operations for the period in which the actual amounts become known.

An accounting policy is deemed to be critical if it requires an accounting estimate to be made based on assumptions about matters that are highly uncertain at the time the estimate is made, and if different estimates that reasonably could have been used, or changes in the accounting estimates that are reasonably likely to occur periodically, could materially impact the financial statements. Management believes the following critical accounting policies reflect its more significant estimates and assumptions used in the preparation of the Consolidated Financial Statements:

Revenue recognition.    Revenue before reimbursements for out-of-pocket expenses (“net revenue”) is recognized when earned and realizable and therefore when the following criteria have been met: (a) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists; (b) services have been rendered; (c) the fee to our client is fixed or determinable; and (d) collectibility is reasonably assured. Net revenue consists of retainers and indirect expenses billed to clients. Typically, we are paid a retainer for our executive search services equal to approximately one-third of the estimated first year compensation of the position to be filled. If actual compensation of the placed candidate exceeds the estimated compensation, we are generally authorized to bill the client for one-third of the excess. Net revenue from executive search engagements is recognized over the expected average period of performance, in proportion to the estimated personnel time incurred to fulfill our obligations under the arrangements. Net revenue in excess of the retainer, resulting from actual compensation of the placed candidate exceeding estimated compensation, is recognized upon completion of the executive search when the amount of the additional fee is known. Our assumptions about the duration of the time and extent of efforts for search teams to complete our services in an executive search engagement require significant judgment as these variables have fluctuated in the past and are expected to continue to do so. These assumptions are updated annually or whenever conditions exist to indicate that more frequent updates are necessary.

30

Table of Contents

Restructuring charges.    We account for restructuring charges by recognizing a liability at fair value when the costs are incurred.

Inherent in these accruals are estimates concerning vacancy periods, expected sublease income, and costs to terminate the leases. These accruals are periodically updated to reflect information concerning the commercial real estate markets in which the offices are located. We believe that the accounting estimate related to accruals for the consolidation and closing of offices is a critical accounting estimate because it is highly susceptible to changes in the commercial real estate markets and the local regional economic factors where this leased office space is located.

Income taxes.    Determining the consolidated provision for income tax expense, income tax liabilities and deferred tax assets and liabilities involves judgment. As a global company, we calculate and provide for income taxes in each of the tax jurisdictions in which we operate. This involves estimating current tax exposures in each jurisdiction as well as making judgments regarding the recoverability of deferred tax assets. Tax exposures can involve complex issues and may require an extended period to resolve. Changes in the geographic mix or estimated level of annual income before taxes can affect the overall effective tax rate.

We apply an estimated annual effective tax rate to our cumulative quarterly operating results to determine the provision for income tax expense. In the event there is a significant unusual or infrequent item recognized in our quarterly operating results, the tax attributable to that item is recorded in the interim period in which it occurs.

No deferred tax liabilities have been recorded for U.S. income taxes and foreign withholding taxes related to undistributed foreign earnings that are planned to be indefinitely reinvested. If future events, including material changes in estimates of cash, working capital and long-term investment requirements, necessitate that these earnings be distributed, an additional provision for taxes may apply, which could materially affect our future effective tax rate.

As a matter of course, we are regularly audited by various taxing authorities, and sometimes these audits result in proposed assessments where the ultimate resolution may result in our owing additional taxes. We establish reserves on uncertain tax return positions that do not meet the more likely than not recognition criteria. We evaluate these reserves each quarter and adjust the reserves and the related accrued interest in light of changing facts and circumstances regarding the uncertainty of realizing tax benefits, such as the ultimate settlement of tax audits or the expiration of a statute of limitations. We believe the estimates and assumptions used to support our evaluation of tax benefit realization are reasonable. However, final determinations of prior-year tax liabilities, either by settlement with tax authorities or expiration of statutes of limitations, could be materially different than estimates reflected in assets and liabilities and historical income tax provisions. The outcome of these final determinations could have a material effect on our income tax provision, net income, or cash flows in the period in which that determination is made. We believe our tax positions comply with applicable tax law and that we have adequately provided for any known tax reserves.

Goodwill and other intangible assets.    We review goodwill for impairment annually and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying value of an asset may not be recoverable. The goodwill impairment test compares the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount, including goodwill. If the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value, goodwill of the reporting unit would be considered impaired. To measure the amount of the impairment loss, the implied fair value of a reporting unit’s goodwill is compared to the carrying amount of that goodwill. If the carrying amount of a reporting unit’s goodwill exceeds the implied fair value of that goodwill, an impairment loss is recognized in an amount equal to that excess. The implied fair value of goodwill is determined in the same manner as the amount of goodwill recognized in a business combination is determined. The fair value of each of our reporting units was determined using a combination of valuation techniques, including a discounted cash flow methodology and comparable public company methodology, with the assistance of an independent valuation firm.

31

Table of Contents

The discounted cash flow approach is dependent on a number of factors including estimates of future market growth and trends, forecasted revenue and costs, capital investments, appropriate discount rates, certain assumptions to allocate shared assets and liabilities, and other variables to calculate the carrying values for each of our reporting units. We base our fair value estimates on assumptions we believe to be reasonable, but which are unpredictable and inherently uncertain. Actual future results may differ from those estimates. These assumptions are updated annually, at a minimum, to reflect information concerning our reportable segments.

Additionally, we review long-lived assets, such as property, equipment, and purchased intangibles subject to amortization for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to estimated undiscounted future cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. If the carrying amount of an asset exceeds its estimated future cash flows, an impairment charge, equal to the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset exceeds the fair value of the asset, is recognized.

We believe that the accounting estimate related to goodwill and other intangible asset impairment is a critical accounting estimate because the assumptions used are highly susceptible to changes in the operating results and cash flows of our reportable segments.

Allowance for doubtful accounts.    Accounts receivable from our customers are recorded at the invoiced amount and do not bear interest. The allowance for doubtful accounts is our best estimate of the amount of probable credit losses in existing accounts receivable balances. We determine the allowance for doubtful accounts through an analysis of several factors, including the aging of our accounts receivable, historical write-off experience, and specific account analyses. We consider current and projected economic conditions and historical trends when determining the allowance for doubtful accounts. Actual collections of accounts receivable could differ from our estimates due to changes in future economic or industry conditions or specific customers’ financial condition.

The allowance for doubtful accounts is recorded as a reduction in revenue to the extent the provision relates to fee adjustments and other discretionary pricing adjustments. To the extent the provision relates to a customer’s inability to make required payments on accounts receivables, the provision is recorded within operating expenses.

Stock-based compensation.    We measure our stock-based compensation costs based on the grant date fair value of the awards and recognize these costs in the financial statements over the requisite service period. We apply a forfeiture rate to our share-based awards that represents our best estimate of the amount of awards that will be forfeited. Our estimate is based on our historical experience and specific analysis. We review our forfeiture rate quarterly or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate our estimate may need to be revised. Actual forfeitures could differ from our estimates due to changes in retention rates of our employee population.

Recently Adopted Financial Accounting Standards

On January 1, 2008, we adopted new accounting guidance on fair value measurements for certain financial assets and liabilities. This new guidance defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. See Note 7, Fair Value Measurements, for additional information regarding our fair value measurements for financial assets and liabilities. On January 1, 2009, we adopted the new guidance for nonfinancial assets, such as goodwill and long-lived assets, and nonfinancial liabilities. The adoption on January 1, 2009 for non-financial assets and liabilities did not have a material impact on our financial condition or results of operations.

On January 1, 2009, we adopted new accounting guidance on business combinations. The new guidance requires that all business combinations be accounted for by applying the acquisition method. Under the

32

Table of Contents

acquisition method, the acquirer recognizes and measures the identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, and any contingent consideration and contractual contingencies, as a whole, at their fair values as of the acquisition date. It further requires that acquisition-related costs be recognized separately from the acquisition and expensed as incurred, restructuring costs generally be expensed in periods subsequent to the acquisition date, and changes in accounting for deferred tax asset valuation allowances and acquired income tax uncertainties after the measurement period be recorded against income tax expense. The adoption of this new guidance impacted our accounting treatment for the Ray & Berndtson Sp. z o. o acquisition in 2009.

On January 1, 2009, we adopted new accounting guidance on noncontrolling interests in consolidated financial statements. The guidance changes the accounting and reporting for minority interests, which will be classified as noncontrolling interests and included as a component of equity. The adoption of this new guidance changed our accounting and reporting for noncontrolling interests on a prospective basis. Currently, we do not have any material noncontrolling interests.

On June 30, 2009, we adopted new accounting guidance on subsequent event disclosure requirements, which establishes standards of accounting for and disclosure of events or transactions that occur after the balance sheet date but before financial statements are issued or available to be issued. The addition of these disclosure requirements did not have a material impact on our financial condition or results of operations. See Note 23, Subsequent Events, for the required disclosures.

On July 1, 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued “The FASB Accounting Standards Codification^TM and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles a replacement of FASB Statement No. 162,” which we adopted on the effective date September 30, 2009. This issuance serves as the source of authoritative accounting principles recognized by the FASB to be applied by nongovernmental entities in the preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America. All guidance contained in the Codification carries an equal level of authority. The Codification supersedes all non-SEC accounting and reporting standards. All other nongrandfathered non-SEC accounting literature not included in the Codification became nonauthoritative. Upon adoption of the Codification, we eliminated all references to accounting standards issued prior to the effective date.

On December 31, 2009, we adopted new accounting guidance on employers’ disclosures about pensions and other post retirement benefits which provides guidance on an employers’ disclosures about plan assets of a defined benefit pension or other post-retirement plan. We are required to disclose additional information about how investment decisions are made, the major categories of plan assets and the fair-value techniques and inputs used to measure plan assets. The addition of these disclosure requirements did not have a material impact on our financial condition or results of operations. See Note 14, Pension Plan and Life Insurance Contract, for the required disclosures.

33

Table of Contents

Quarterly Financial Information

The following table sets forth certain financial information for each quarter of 2009 and 2008. The information is derived from our quarterly consolidated financial statements which are unaudited but which, in the opinion of management, have been prepared on the same basis as the audited annual consolidated financial statements included in this document. The consolidated financial data shown below should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto. The operating results for any quarter are not necessarily indicative of results for any future period.

34

Table of Contents

ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Currency market risk.    With our operations in the Americas, Europe and Asia Pacific we conduct business using various currencies. Revenue earned in each country is generally matched with the associated expenses incurred, thereby reducing currency risk to earnings. However, because certain assets and liabilities are denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar, changes in currency rates may cause fluctuations in the valuation of such assets and liabilities. As the local currency of our subsidiaries has generally been designated as the functional currency, we are affected by the translation of foreign currency financial statements into U.S. dollars. A 1% change in the average exchange rate for currencies of all foreign countries in which we operate would have increased or decreased our 2009 net loss by approximately $0.1 million. For financial information by geographic segment, see Note 20, Segment Information, in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

35

Table of Contents

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

HEIDRICK & STRUGGLES INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

36

Table of Contents

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Board of Directors and Stockholders

Heidrick & Struggles International, Inc.:

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Heidrick & Struggles International, Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity and comprehensive income (loss), and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2009. We also have audited the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Company’s management is responsible for these consolidated financial statements, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements and an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audits of the consolidated financial statements included examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Heidrick & Struggles International, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2009, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.

KPMG LLP

Chicago, Illinois

March 1, 2010

37

Table of Contents

HEIDRICK & STRUGGLES INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(In thousands, except share amounts)