HELEN OF TROY LTD - Quarter Report: 2007 May (Form 10-Q)
UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON,
D.C. 20549
FORM
10-Q
T
|
QUARTERLY
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES ACT OF
1934
|
|
For
the quarterly period ended May 31, 2007
|
||
or
|
||
£
|
TRANSITION
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT
|
|
OF
1934
|
||
For
the transition period from ________ to ________
|
Commission
file number: 001-14669
HELEN
OF TROY LIMITED
(Exact
name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Bermuda
|
74-2692550
|
|
(State
or other jurisdiction of
|
(I.R.S.
Employer
|
|
incorporation
or organization)
|
Identification
No.)
|
|
Clarenden
House
Church
Street
Hamilton,
Bermuda
|
|
|
(Address
of principal executive offices)
|
||
1
Helen of Troy Plaza
|
||
El
Paso, Texas
|
79912
|
|
(Registrant’s
United States Mailing Address)
|
(Zip
Code)
|
(915)
225-8000
(Registrant’s
telephone number, including area code)
[Not
Applicable]
(Former
name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last
report)
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to
be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required
to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements
for
the past 90 days. Yes T
No
£
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated
filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act (Check
one):
Large
accelerated filer £
|
Accelerated
filer T
|
Non-accelerated
filer £
|
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes £
No
T
Indicate
the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes of common
stock, as of the latest practicable date.
Class
|
Outstanding
at July 5, 2007
|
|
Common
Shares, $0.10 par value per share
|
30,391,606
shares
|
HELEN
OF TROY LIMITED AND SUBSIDIARIES
INDEX
- FORM 10-Q
Page
|
|||||
PART
I.
|
FINANCIAL
INFORMATION
|
||||
Item
1
|
Financial
Statements (Unaudited)
|
||||
Consolidated
Condensed Balance Sheets
|
|||||
as
of May 31, 2007 and February 28, 2007
|
3
|
||||
Consolidated
Condensed Statements of Income
|
|||||
for
the Three Months Ended
|
|||||
May
31, 2007 and May 31, 2006
|
4
|
||||
Consolidated
Condensed Statements of Cash Flows
|
|||||
for
the Three Months Ended
|
|||||
May
31, 2007 and May 31, 2006
|
5
|
||||
Consolidated
Condensed Statements of Comprehensive Income
|
|||||
for
the Three Months Ended
|
|||||
May
31, 2007 and May 31, 2006
|
6
|
||||
Notes
to Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements
|
7
|
||||
Item
2
|
Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
|
||||
and
Results of Operations
|
27
|
||||
Item
3
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
|
39
|
|||
Item
4
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
42
|
|||
PART
II.
|
OTHER
INFORMATION
|
||||
Item
1
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
43
|
|||
Item
1A
|
Risk
Factors
|
44
|
|||
Item
2
|
Unregistered
Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
|
44
|
|||
Item
6
|
Exhibits
|
45
|
|||
Signatures
|
46
|
-2-
PART
I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM
1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
HELEN
OF TROY LIMITED AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated
Condensed Balance Sheets
(in
thousands, except shares and par
value)
|
|||||||
May
31,
|
February
28,
|
||||||
2007
|
2007
|
||||||
(unaudited)
|
|||||||
Assets
|
|||||||
Current
assets:
|
|||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
$
|
29,169
|
$
|
35,455
|
|||
Temporary
investments
|
30,250
|
55,750
|
|||||
Trading
securities, at market value
|
134
|
189
|
|||||
Receivables
- principally trade, less allowance of $1,075 and $1,002
|
111,500
|
115,896
|
|||||
Inventories
|
156,214
|
144,070
|
|||||
Prepaid
expenses and other assets
|
11,105
|
8,379
|
|||||
Deferred
income tax benefits
|
11,009
|
13,479
|
|||||
Total
current assets
|
349,381
|
373,218
|
|||||
Property
and equipment, at cost less accumulated depreciation of $37,891
and
$35,325
|
95,405
|
96,669
|
|||||
Goodwill
|
212,496
|
201,002
|
|||||
Trademarks,
net of accumulated amortization of $232 and $230
|
166,909
|
158,061
|
|||||
License
agreements, net of accumulated amortization of $16,313 and
$15,953
|
26,002
|
26,362
|
|||||
Other
intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization of $4,975 and
$4,561
|
16,573
|
14,653
|
|||||
Tax
certificates
|
25,144
|
25,144
|
|||||
Other
assets
|
11,040
|
11,163
|
|||||
Total
assets
|
$
|
902,950
|
$
|
906,272
|
|||
Liabilities
and Stockholders' Equity
|
|||||||
Current
liabilities:
|
|||||||
Current
portion of long-term debt
|
$
|
10,000
|
$
|
10,000
|
|||
Accounts
payable, principally trade
|
34,471
|
37,779
|
|||||
Accrued
expenses and current liabilities
|
52,940
|
62,384
|
|||||
Income
taxes payable
|
25,660
|
24,924
|
|||||
Total
current liabilities
|
123,071
|
135,087
|
|||||
Long-term
compensation liabilities
|
1,285
|
2,095
|
|||||
Long-term
income taxes payable
|
9,313
|
-
|
|||||
Deferred
income tax liability
|
894
|
1,673
|
|||||
Long-term
debt, less current portion
|
240,000
|
240,000
|
|||||
Total
liabilities
|
374,563
|
378,855
|
|||||
Commitments
and contingencies (See Notes 3, 12, 14, 15 and 18)
|
|||||||
Stockholders'
equity:
|
|||||||
Cumulative
preferred shares, non-voting, $1.00 par. Authorized 2,000,000 shares;
none
issued
|
-
|
-
|
|||||
Common
shares, $.10 par. Authorized 50,000,000 shares; 30,328,456 and
30,286,406
shares issued
and outstanding
|
3,033
|
3,029
|
|||||
Additional
paid-in-capital
|
89,867
|
94,951
|
|||||
Retained
earnings
|
435,209
|
431,003
|
|||||
Accumulated
other comprehensive income
|
278
|
(1,566
|
)
|
||||
Total
stockholders' equity
|
528,387
|
527,417
|
|||||
Total
liabilities and stockholders' equity
|
$
|
902,950
|
$
|
906,272
|
See
accompanying notes to consolidated condensed financial
statements.
|
-3-
HELEN
OF TROY LIMITED AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
||
Consolidated
Condensed Statements of Income (unaudited)
|
(in
thousands, except per share data)
|
|||||||
Three
Months Ended May 31,
|
|||||||
2007
|
2006
|
||||||
Net
sales
|
$
|
140,170
|
$
|
130,441
|
|||
Cost
of sales
|
80,152
|
72,500
|
|||||
Gross
profit
|
60,018
|
57,941
|
|||||
Selling,
general, and administrative expense
|
45,717
|
47,025
|
|||||
Operating
income
|
14,301
|
10,916
|
|||||
Other
income (expense):
|
|||||||
Interest
expense
|
(4,113
|
)
|
(4,506
|
)
|
|||
Other
income, net
|
1,254
|
790
|
|||||
Total
other income (expense)
|
(2,859
|
)
|
(3,716
|
)
|
|||
Earnings
before income taxes
|
11,442
|
7,200
|
|||||
Income
tax expense (benefit):
|
|||||||
Current
|
592
|
939
|
|||||
Deferred
|
733
|
(418
|
)
|
||||
Net
earnings
|
$
|
10,117
|
$
|
6,679
|
|||
Earnings
per share:
|
|||||||
Basic
|
$
|
0.33
|
$
|
0.22
|
|||
Diluted
|
$
|
0.32
|
$
|
0.21
|
|||
Weighted
average common shares used in computing net earnings per
share
|
|||||||
Basic
|
30,294
|
30,022
|
|||||
Diluted
|
32,035
|
31,460
|
See
accompanying notes to consolidated condensed financial
statements.
|
-4-
HELEN
OF TROY LIMITED AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
|||
Consolidated
Condensed Statements of Cash Flows (unaudited)
|
(in
thousands)
|
|||||||
Three
Months Ended May 31,
|
|||||||
2007
|
2006
|
||||||
Cash
flows from operating activities:
|
|||||||
Net
earnings
|
$
|
10,117
|
$
|
6,679
|
|||
Adjustments
to reconcile net earnings to net cash (used) / provided by operating
activities:
|
|||||||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
3,524
|
3,880
|
|||||
Provision
for doubtful receivables
|
73
|
(228
|
)
|
||||
Share-based
compensation expense
|
190
|
187
|
|||||
Unrealized
(gain) / loss - trading securities
|
55
|
(60
|
)
|
||||
Deferred
taxes, net
|
583
|
(458
|
)
|
||||
Gain
on the sale of property, plant and equipment
|
-
|
(422
|
)
|
||||
Changes
in operating assets and liabilities, net of effects of
acquisitions
|
|||||||
Accounts
receivable
|
11,772
|
(6,722
|
)
|
||||
Inventories
|
(3,718
|
)
|
4,382
|
||||
Prepaid
expenses and other assets
|
(4,228
|
)
|
(2,845
|
)
|
|||
Other
assets
|
(408
|
)
|
(298
|
)
|
|||
Accounts
payable
|
(3,298
|
)
|
2,352
|
||||
Accrued
expenses and current liabilities
|
(7,843
|
)
|
(6,046
|
)
|
|||
Income
taxes payable
|
(1,909
|
)
|
542
|
||||
Net
cash provided by operating activities
|
4,910
|
943
|
|||||
Cash
flows from investing activities:
|
|||||||
Capital,
license, trademark, and other intangible expenditures
|
(1,111
|
)
|
(1,700
|
)
|
|||
Acquisitions
of business
|
(36,500
|
)
|
-
|
||||
Proceeds
from the sale of property, plant and equipment
|
-
|
666
|
|||||
Purchase
of temporary securities
|
(57,350
|
)
|
(15,000
|
)
|
|||
Sale
of temporary securities
|
82,850
|
15,000
|
|||||
Net
cash used by investing activities
|
(12,111
|
)
|
(1,034
|
)
|
|||
Cash
flows from financing activities:
|
|||||||
Proceeds
from debt
|
-
|
7,660
|
|||||
Proceeds
from exercise of stock options, including related tax
benefits
|
864
|
143
|
|||||
Share-based
compensation tax benefit
|
51
|
40
|
|||||
Net
cash provided by financing activities
|
915
|
7,843
|
|||||
Net
(decrease) / increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
(6,286
|
)
|
7,752
|
||||
Cash
and cash equivalents, beginning of period
|
35,455
|
18,320
|
|||||
Cash
and cash equivalents, end of period
|
$
|
29,169
|
$
|
26,072
|
|||
Supplemental
cash flow disclosures:
|
|||||||
Interest
paid
|
$
|
3,847
|
$
|
3,707
|
|||
Income
taxes paid (net of refunds)
|
$
|
2,516
|
$
|
396
|
See
accompanying notes to consolidated condensed financial
statements.
|
-5-
HELEN
OF TROY LIMITED AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
||
Consolidated
Condensed Statements Of Comprehensive Income
(unaudited)
|
(in
thousands)
|
|||||||
Three
Months Ended May 31,
|
|||||||
2007
|
2006
|
||||||
Net
earnings, as reported
|
$
|
10,117
|
$
|
6,679
|
|||
Other
comprehensive income (loss), net of tax:
|
|||||||
Cash
flow hedges - Interest Rate Swaps
|
1,941
|
-
|
|||||
Cash
flow hedges - Foreign Currency
|
(97
|
)
|
(922
|
)
|
|||
Comprehensive
income
|
$
|
11,961
|
$
|
5,757
|
See
accompanying notes to consolidated condensed financial
statements.
|
-6-
HELEN
OF TROY LIMITED AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
May
31, 2007
Note
1 - Basis
of Presentation
In
our
opinion, the accompanying consolidated condensed financial statements contain
all adjustments (consisting of only normal recurring adjustments) necessary
to
present fairly our consolidated financial position as of May 31, 2007 and
February 28, 2007, and the results of our consolidated operations for the three
month
periods
ended May 31, 2007 and 2006. The same accounting policies are followed in
preparing quarterly financial data as are followed in preparing annual data.
Due
to
the seasonal nature of our business, quarterly revenues, expenses, earnings
and
cash flows are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected
for the full fiscal year. While we believe that the disclosures presented are
adequate and the consolidated condensed financial statements are not misleading,
these statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial
statements and the notes included in our latest annual report on Form 10-K,
and
our other reports on file with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(“SEC”).
We
have
reclassified certain prior-period amounts, and in some cases provided additional
information in our consolidated condensed financial statements and accompanying
footnotes to conform to the current period’s presentation. These
reclassifications have no impact on previously reported net
earnings.
In
these
consolidated condensed financial statements, accompanying footnotes, and
elsewhere in this report, amounts shown are in thousands of U.S. Dollars, except
as otherwise indicated.
Note
2 - New
Accounting Pronouncements
New
Accounting Standards Currently Adopted
Effects
of Misstatements
- In
September 2006, the SEC issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 108, “Considering
the Effects of Prior Year Misstatements when Quantifying Misstatements in
Current Year Financial Statements” (“SAB 108”). SAB 108 provides guidance on how
prior year misstatements should be taken into consideration when quantifying
misstatements in current year financial statements for purposes of determining
whether the current year’s financial statements are materially misstated. SAB
108 permits registrants to record the cumulative effect of initial adoption
by
recording the necessary “correcting” adjustments to the carrying values of
assets and liabilities as of the beginning of that year with the offsetting
adjustment recorded to the opening balance of retained earnings, only if
material under the dual method. We were not required to record any adjustments
upon the application of SAB 108.
Uncertainty
in Income Taxes
- In
July 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued
Interpretation 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes—An Interpretation
of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 109” (“FIN 48”). FIN 48
clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an
enterprise’s financial statements, and prescribes a recognition threshold and
measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement
of
a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. FIN 48 also
provides guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties,
accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition. The provisions of
FIN
48 are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006. We adopted
the provisions of FIN 48 at the beginning of the first quarter of fiscal 2008,
and the details of our adoption of FIN 48 are described in Note 12.
-7-
New
Accounting Standards Subject to Future Adoption
Liability
Recognition on Endorsement Split-Dollar Life Insurance Arrangements
-
In June
2006, the EITF reached a consensus on EITF Issue No. 06-4 ("EITF 06-4"),
"Accounting for Deferred Compensation and Postretirement Benefit Aspects of
Endorsement Split-Dollar Life Insurance Arrangements," which requires the
application of the provisions of SFAS No. 106 (“SFAS 106”), “Employers’
Accounting for Postretirement Benefits Other Than Pensions” to endorsement
split-dollar life insurance arrangements. SFAS 106 would require us to recognize
a liability for the discounted future benefit obligation that we will have
to
pay upon the death of the underlying insured employee. An endorsement-type
arrangement generally exists when the Company owns and controls all incidents
of
ownership of the underlying policies. EITF 06-4 is currently effective for
fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2007. We have certain life insurance
policies which may be subject to the provisions of this new pronouncement and
are currently determining the effect, if any, the adoption of EITF 06-4 will
have on our financial statements.
Fair
Value Measurements
- In
September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS 157 “Fair Value Measurements.” This
Statement defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value
in generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), and expands disclosures
about fair value measurements. This Statement applies under other accounting
pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements. Accordingly,
this
Statement does not require any new fair value measurements, but will potentially
require additional disclosures regarding existing fair value measurements we
currently report. This Statement is effective for financial statements issued
for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, and interim periods within
those fiscal years. We are currently determining the effect, if any, this
pronouncement will have on our financial statements.
Fair
Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial
Liabilities
- In
February 2007, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No.159 “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities -
Including an amendment of FASB Statement No. 115” (“SFAS 159”). SFAS 159 permits
entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other
items
at fair value that are not currently required to be measured at fair value.
SFAS
159 also established presentation and disclosure requirements designed to
facilitate comparisons that choose different measurement attributes for similar
types of assets and liabilities. This Statement is effective for financial
statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, and
interim periods within those fiscal years. We are currently determining the
effect, if any, this pronouncement will have on our financial
statements.
Liability
Recognition on Collateral Assignment Split-Dollar Life Insurance Arrangements
-
In
March 2007, the EITF reached a consensus on EITF Issue No. 06-10 ("EITF 06-10"),
"Accounting for Deferred Compensation and Postretirement Benefit Aspects of
Collateral Assignment Split-Dollar Life Insurance Arrangements," which provides
guidance to help companies determine whether a liability for the postretirement
benefit associated with a collateral assignment split-dollar life insurance
arrangement should be recorded in accordance with either SFAS 106 (if, in
substance, a postretirement benefit plan exists), or Accounting Principles
Board
Opinion No. 12 (if the arrangement is, in substance, an individual deferred
compensation contract). EITF 06-10 also provides guidance on how a company
should recognize and measure the asset in a collateral assignment split-dollar
life insurance contract. EITF 06-10 is effective for fiscal years beginning
after December 15, 2007. We have certain life insurance policies which may
be
subject to the provisions of this new pronouncement and are currently
determining the effect, if any, the adoption of EITF 06-10 will have on our
financial statements.
From
time
to time, new accounting pronouncements are issued by the FASB or other standards
setting bodies that we adopt as of the specified effective date. Unless
otherwise discussed, we believe that the impact of recently issued standards
that are not yet effective are either not applicable to the Company at this
time, or will not have a material impact on our consolidated condensed financial
statements upon adoption.
-8-
Note
3 - Litigation
Securities
Class Action Litigation - Class
action lawsuits have been filed and consolidated into one action against the
Company, Gerald J. Rubin, the Company’s Chairman of the Board, President and
Chief Executive Officer, and Thomas J. Benson, the Company’s Chief Financial
Officer, on behalf of purchasers of publicly traded securities of the Company.
The Company understands that the plaintiffs allege violations of Sections 10(b)
and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as amended (the “Exchange
Act”), and Rule 10b-5 thereunder, on the grounds that the Company and the two
officers engaged in a scheme to defraud the Company’s shareholders through the
issuance of positive earnings guidance intended to artificially inflate the
Company’s share price so that Mr. Rubin could sell almost 400,000 of the
Company’s common shares at an inflated price. The plaintiffs are seeking
unspecified damages, interest, fees, costs, an accounting of any alleged insider
trading proceeds, and injunctive relief, including an accounting of and the
imposition of a constructive trust and/or asset freeze on the defendants’
alleged insider trading proceeds. The class period stated in the complaint
was
October 12, 2004 through October 10, 2005.
The
lawsuit was brought in the United States District Court for the Western District
of Texas. The Company intends to defend the foregoing lawsuit vigorously, but,
because the lawsuit is still in the preliminary stages, the Company cannot
predict the outcome and is not currently able to evaluate the likelihood of
success or the range of potential loss, if any, that might be incurred in
connection with the action. However, if the Company were to lose on any issues
connected with the lawsuit or if the lawsuit is not settled on favorable terms,
the judgement or settlement may have a material adverse effect on the Company's
consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows. There
is
a risk that such litigation could result in substantial costs and divert
management’s attention and resources from its business, which could adversely
affect the Company's business. The Company carries insurance that provides
an
aggregate coverage of $20 million after a self-insured retention of $500
thousand for the period during which the claims were filed, but cannot evaluate
at this time whether such coverage will be adequate to cover losses, if any,
arising out of the lawsuit.
On
May
15, 2006, the Company filed a motion to dismiss the aforementioned lawsuit
citing numerous deficiencies with the claims asserted in the lawsuit. On May
24,
2007, the motion to dismiss was denied. The discovery phase of the litigation
is
now underway.
Other
Matters -
We
are
involved in various other legal claims and proceedings in the normal course
of
operations. We believe the outcome of these matters will not have a material
adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations,
or
liquidity.
Note
4 - Earnings
per Share
Basic
earnings per share is computed based upon the weighted average number of shares
of common stock outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share is
computed based upon the weighted average number of shares of common stock plus
the effects of dilutive securities. The number of dilutive securities was
1,740,309 and 1,437,418 for the three month periods ended May 31, 2007 and
2006,
respectively. All dilutive securities during these periods consisted of stock
options issued under our stock option plans. There were options to purchase
common shares that were outstanding but not included in the computation of
earnings per share because the exercise prices of such options were greater
than
the average market prices of our common shares. These options totaled 284,379
and 908,580 at May 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
-9-
Note
5 - Segment
Information
In
the
tables that follow, we present two segments: Personal Care and Housewares.
Our
Personal Care segment’s products include hair dryers, straighteners, curling
irons, hairsetters, women’s shavers, mirrors, hot air brushes, home hair
clippers and trimmers, paraffin baths, massage cushions, footbaths, body
massagers, brushes, combs, hair accessories, liquid hair styling products,
men’s
fragrances, men’s deodorants, foot powder, body powder, and skin care products.
Our Housewares segment reports the operations of OXO International (“OXO”) whose
products include kitchen tools, cutlery, bar and wine accessories, household
cleaning tools, tea kettles, trash cans, storage and organization products,
hand
tools, gardening tools, kitchen mitts and trivets, barbeque tools, and
rechargeable lighting products. We use outside manufacturers to produce our
goods. Both our Personal Care and Housewares segments sell their products
primarily through mass merchandisers, drug chains, warehouse clubs, catalogs,
grocery stores and specialty stores. In addition, the Personal Care segment
sells extensively through beauty supply retailers and wholesalers.
The
accounting policies of our segments are the same as those described in the
summary of significant accounting policies in Note 1 to the consolidated
financial statements in our 2007 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
The
following tables contain segment information for the periods covered by our
consolidated condensed statements of income:
THREE
MONTHS ENDED MAY 31, 2007 AND 2006
|
||||||||||
(in
thousands)
|
||||||||||
May
31, 2007
|
|
Personal
Care
|
|
Housewares
|
|
Total
|
||||
Net
sales
|
$
|
106,812
|
$
|
33,358
|
$
|
140,170
|
||||
Operating
income
|
8,872
|
5,429
|
14,301
|
|||||||
Capital,
license, trademark and other intangible expenditures
|
314
|
797
|
1,111
|
|||||||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
2,368
|
1,156
|
3,524
|
May
31, 2006
|
Personal
Care
|
Housewares
|
Total
|
|||||||
Net
sales
|
$
|
105,324
|
$
|
25,117
|
$
|
130,441
|
||||
Operating
income
|
6,192
|
4,724
|
10,916
|
|||||||
Capital,
license, trademark and other intangible expenditures
|
1,182
|
518
|
1,700
|
|||||||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
2,619
|
1,261
|
3,880
|
The
following tables contain net assets allocable to each segment for the periods
covered by our consolidated condensed balance sheets:
IDENTIFIABLE
NET ASSETS AT MAY 31, 2007 AND FEBRUARY 28,
2007
|
(in
thousands)
|
||||||||||
|
|
Personal
Care
|
|
Housewares
|
|
Total
|
||||
May
31, 2007
|
$
|
560,374
|
$
|
342,576
|
$
|
902,950
|
||||
February
28, 2007
|
554,295
|
351,977
|
906,272
|
Operating
income for each operating segment is computed based on net sales, less cost
of
goods sold and any selling, general, and administrative expenses ("SG&A")
associated with the segment. The selling, general, and administrative expenses
used to compute each segment's operating income are comprised of SG&A
directly associated with the segment, plus overhead expenses that are allocable
to the operating segment.
-10-
During
the first quarter of fiscal 2007, we completed the transition of our Housewares
segment’s operations to our internal operating systems and our new distribution
facility in Southaven, Mississippi. In the last quarter of fiscal 2007, we
completed the consolidation of our domestic appliance inventories into the
same
facility.
Throughout
fiscal 2007, we conducted an evaluation of our shared cost allocation
methodology given the structural and process changes that were taking place
in
our operations, and changed our methodology in the first quarter of fiscal
2008.
We believe the new method better reflects the economics of our newly
consolidated operations. The table below summarizes the expense allocations
made
to the Housewares segment for the three months ended May 31, 2007 compared
to
the same period in the previous year. Some of these expenses were previously
absorbed by the Personal Care segment.
Housewares
Segment Expense Allocation
|
(in
thousands)
|
|||||||
Three
Months Ended May 31,
|
|||||||
2007
|
2006
|
||||||
Distribution
and sourcing expense
|
$
|
2,854
|
$
|
1,427
|
|||
Other
operating and corporate overhead expense
|
1,326
|
998
|
|||||
Total
allocated expenses
|
$
|
4,180
|
$
|
2,425
|
|||
Expense
allocation as a percentage of net sales:
|
|||||||
Distribution
and sourcing expense
|
8.6%
|
|
5.7%
|
|
|||
Other
operating and corporate overhead expense
|
4.0%
|
|
4.0%
|
|
|||
Total
allocated expenses
|
12.5%
|
|
9.7%
|
|
Note 6 - Property and Equipment
A
summary
of property and equipment is as follows:
PROPERTY
AND EQUIPMENT
|
(in
thousands)
|
||||||||||
Estimated
|
||||||||||
Useful
Lives
|
May
31,
|
February
28,
|
||||||||
(Years)
|
2007
|
2007
|
||||||||
Land
|
-
|
$
|
9,537
|
$
|
9,537
|
|||||
Building
and improvements
|
10
- 40
|
62,917
|
62,666
|
|||||||
Computer
and other equipment
|
3
- 10
|
41,388
|
41,265
|
|||||||
Molds
and tooling
|
1
- 3
|
7,281
|
6,538
|
|||||||
Transportation
equipment
|
3
- 5
|
3,957
|
3,912
|
|||||||
Furniture
and fixtures
|
5
- 15
|
8,005
|
7,815
|
|||||||
Construction
in process
|
-
|
211
|
261
|
|||||||
133,296
|
131,994
|
|||||||||
Less
accumulated depreciation
|
(37,891
|
)
|
(35,325
|
)
|
||||||
Property
and equipment, net
|
$
|
95,405
|
$
|
96,669
|
We
recorded depreciation of $2,566 and $2,428 for the three
month
periods ended May 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
Note
7 - Intangible
Assets
We
do not
record amortization expense on goodwill or other intangible assets that have
indefinite useful lives. Amortization expense is recorded for intangible assets
with definite useful lives. We also perform an annual impairment review of
goodwill and other intangible assets. Any asset deemed to be impaired is to
be
written down to its fair value. We completed our annual impairment test during
the first quarter of fiscal 2008, and have determined that none of our goodwill
or other intangible assets were impaired at that time.
-11-
The following table discloses information regarding the carrying amounts and associated accumulated amortization for all intangible assets and indicates the operating segments to which they belong:
INTANGIBLE
ASSETS
|
(in thousands) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
May
31, 2007
|
February
28, 2007
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Type
/ Description
|
|
Segment
|
|
Estimated
Life
|
|
Gross
Carrying
Amount
|
|
Accumulated
Amortization (if Applicable)
|
|
Net
Carrying Amount
|
|
Gross
Carrying Amount
|
|
Accumulated
Amortization (if Applicable)
|
|
Net
Carrying Amount
|
|||||||||
Goodwill:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
OXO
|
Housewares
|
Indefinite
|
$
|
166,131
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
166,131
|
$
|
165,934
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
165,934
|
|||||||||||
All
other goodwill
|
Personal
Care
|
Indefinite
|
46,365
|
-
|
46,365
|
35,068
|
-
|
35,068
|
|||||||||||||||||
212,496
|
-
|
212,496
|
201,002
|
-
|
201,002
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Trademarks:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
OXO
|
Housewares
|
Indefinite
|
75,554
|
-
|
75,554
|
75,554
|
-
|
75,554
|
|||||||||||||||||
Brut
|
Personal
Care
|
Indefinite
|
51,317
|
-
|
51,317
|
51,317
|
-
|
51,317
|
|||||||||||||||||
All
other - definite lives
|
Personal
Care
|
[1]
|
|
338
|
(232
|
)
|
106
|
338
|
(230
|
)
|
108
|
||||||||||||||
All
other - indefinite lives
|
Personal
Care
|
Indefinite
|
39,932
|
-
|
39,932
|
31,082
|
-
|
31,082
|
|||||||||||||||||
167,141
|
(232
|
)
|
166,909
|
158,291
|
(230
|
)
|
158,061
|
||||||||||||||||||
Licenses:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Seabreeze
|
Personal
Care
|
Indefinite
|
18,000
|
-
|
18,000
|
18,000
|
-
|
18,000
|
|||||||||||||||||
All
other licenses
|
Personal
Care
|
8
- 25 Years
|
24,315
|
(16,313
|
)
|
8,002
|
24,315
|
(15,953
|
)
|
8,362
|
|||||||||||||||
42,315
|
(16,313
|
)
|
26,002
|
42,315
|
(15,953
|
)
|
26,362
|
||||||||||||||||||
Other:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Patents,
customer lists and non-compete agreements
|
Housewares
|
2
- 14 Years
|
19,313
|
(4,938
|
)
|
14,375
|
19,214
|
(4,561
|
)
|
14,653
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Personal
Care
|
3
- 8 Years
|
2,235
|
(37
|
)
|
2,198
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
||||||||||||||||
21,548
|
(4,975
|
)
|
16,573
|
19,214
|
(4,561
|
)
|
14,653
|
||||||||||||||||||
Total
|
$
|
443,500
|
$
|
(21,520
|
)
|
$
|
421,980
|
$
|
420,822
|
$
|
(20,744
|
)
|
$
|
400,078
|
[1]
Includes one fully amortized trademark and one trademark with an
estimated
life of 30 years
|
-12-
The
following table summarizes the amortization expense attributable to intangible
assets for the three month periods ending May 31, 2007 and 2006, as well as
our
latest estimate of amortization expense for the fiscal years ending the last
day
of February 2008 through 2013.
AMORTIZATION
OF INTANGIBLES
|
(in thousands) | ||||
Aggregate
Amortization Expense
|
||||
For
the three months ended
|
||||
May
31, 2007
|
$
|
776
|
||
May
31, 2006
|
$
|
815
|
||
Estimated
Amortization Expense
|
||||
For
the fiscal years ended
|
||||
February
2008
|
$
|
3,276
|
||
February
2009
|
$
|
3,100
|
||
February
2010
|
$
|
3,056
|
||
February
2011
|
$
|
2,372
|
||
February
2012
|
$
|
2,224
|
||
February
2013
|
$
|
2,190
|
NOTE 8 - Acquisitions And New Trademark License Agreements
Belson
Products Acquisition - Effective
May 1, 2007, we acquired certain assets and liabilities of Belson Products
(“Belson”), the professional salon division of Applica Consumer Products, Inc.
for a cash purchase price of $36,500 plus the assumption of estimated
liabilities. This transaction was accounted for as a purchase of a business
and
was paid for out of available cash on hand. Belson is a supplier of personal
care products to the professional salon industry. Belson markets its
professional products to major beauty suppliers and other major distributors
under brand names including Belson®, Belson Pro®, Gold ‘N Hot®, Curlmaster®,
Premiere®, Profiles®, Comare®, Mega Hot®, and Shear Technology®. Products
include electrical hair care appliances, spa products and accessories,
professional brushes and combs, and professional styling shears. Belson products
are principally distributed throughout the United States, as well as Canada
and
the United Kingdom. We believe that Belson’s portfolio of professional salon
products, in addition to our existing Helen of Troy professional products,
will
continue to strengthen our leadership position in the professional distribution
channels.
Net
assets acquired consist principally of accounts receivable, finished goods
inventories, goodwill, patents, trademarks, tradenames, product design
specifications, production know-how, certain fixed assets, distribution rights
and customer lists, a covenant not-to-compete, less certain customer related
operating accruals and liabilities. The following schedule presents the initial
net assets of Belson acquired at closing:
Belson
Products - Net Assets Acquired on May 1,
2007
|
(in
thousands)
|
||||
Accounts
receivable, net
|
$
|
7,449
|
||
Inventories
|
8,426
|
|||
Fixed
assets
|
139
|
|||
Trademarks,
goodwill and other intangible assets
|
22,381
|
|||
Total
assets acquired
|
38,395
|
|||
Less:
Current liabilities assumed
|
(1,895
|
)
|
||
Net
assets acquired
|
$
|
36,500
|
We
are in
the process of completing our analysis of the economic lives of the assets
acquired and appropriate allocation of the initial purchase price. Based on
our
preliminary analysis, we believe that a significant portion of the purchase
price will be allocated to assets having indefinite economic lives. We expect
to
complete our analysis during fiscal 2008.
Bed
Head® by TIGI and Toni&Guy®
-
On
December 6, 2006, we entered into licensing arrangements with MBL/TIGI Products,
L.P. and MBL/Toni&Guy Products L.P. for the use of the Bed Head® by TIGI and
Toni&Guy® trademarks for personal care products in the Western Hemisphere.
We plan on introducing a line of hair care appliance products under the Bed
Head® by TIGI and Toni&Guy® brand names that eventually will include hair
dryers, hair styling irons and straighteners, hot air brushes, hair setters,
combs, brushes and hair care accessories, as well as a variety of other personal
care products. We have begun marketing in the United States, and plan to market
in the remainder of the Western Hemisphere. Initial domestic product shipments
began during the first fiscal quarter of 2008.
-13-
Candela®
Acquisition - On
September 25, 2006, we acquired all rights to trademarks, certain patents,
formulas, tooling and production processes to Vessel, Inc.’s rechargeable
lighting products under various brand names, including Candela®. The products
will be sold by our Housewares segment. We believe the acquired trademarks
have
indefinite economic lives. The following schedule presents the assets acquired
at closing and management’s purchase price allocation:
Assets
Acquired from Vessel, Inc.
|
(in
thousands)
|
||||
Trademarks
|
$
|
354
|
||
Patents
|
120
|
|||
Fixed
Assets
|
26
|
|||
Total
assets acquired
|
$
|
500
|
Note
9 - Short
Term Debt
We
entered into a five year Revolving Credit Agreement (“Revolving Line of Credit
Agreement”), dated as of June 1, 2004, with Bank of America, N.A. and other
lenders. Borrowings under the Revolving Line of Credit Agreement accrue interest
equal to the higher of the Federal Funds Rate plus 0.50 percent or Bank of
America's prime rate. Alternatively, upon timely election by the Company,
borrowings accrue interest based on the respective 1, 2, 3, or 6-month LIBOR
rate plus a margin of 0.75 percent to 1.25 percent based upon the "Leverage
Ratio" at the time of the borrowing. The "Leverage Ratio" is defined by the
Revolving Line of Credit Agreement as the ratio of total consolidated
indebtedness, including the subject funding on such date to consolidated
earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization ("EBITDA") for
the period of the four consecutive fiscal quarters most recently ended. The
credit line allows for the issuance of letters of credit up to $10,000. We
incur
loan commitment fees at a current rate of 0.30 percent per annum on the unused
balance of the Revolving Line of Credit Agreement and letter of credit fees
at a
current rate of 1.125 percent per annum on the face value of the letter of
credit. On June 7, 2007, we gave notice to permanently reduce our Revolving
Line
of Credit Agreement from $75,000 to $50,000. Outstanding letters of credit
reduce the borrowing limit dollar for dollar. During fiscal 2007, we did not
draw on the Revolving Line of Credit. As of May 31, 2007, there were no
revolving loans and $1,260 of open letters of credit outstanding against this
facility.
The
Revolving Line of Credit Agreement requires the maintenance of certain
debt/EBITDA, fixed charge coverage ratios, and other customary covenants.
Certain covenants, as of the latest balance sheet date, limit our total
outstanding indebtedness from all sources to no more than 3.5 times the latest
twelve months’ trailing EBITDA. These covenants effectively limited our ability
to incur no more than $66,923 of additional debt from all sources, including
draws on our Revolving Line of Credit Agreement. The agreement is
unconditionally guaranteed, on a joint and several basis, by the parent company,
Helen of Troy Limited, and certain subsidiaries. Any amounts outstanding under
the Revolving Line of Credit Agreement will mature on June 1, 2009. As of May
31, 2007, we were in compliance with the terms of this agreement.
Note
10 - Accrued
Expenses and Current Liabilities
A
summary
of accrued expenses was as follows:
ACCRUED
EXPENSES AND CURRENT LIABILITIES
|
(in
thousands)
|
|||||||
May
31,
|
February
28,
|
||||||
2007
|
2007
|
||||||
Accrued
discounts and allowances
|
$
|
22,573
|
$
|
25,054
|
|||
Accrued
compensation
|
3,632
|
8,889
|
|||||
Accrued
advertising
|
9,145
|
9,269
|
|||||
Accrued
interest
|
2,917
|
2,833
|
|||||
Accrued
royalties
|
1,214
|
2,549
|
|||||
Accrued
professional fees
|
1,430
|
1,218
|
|||||
Accrued
benefits and payroll taxes
|
1,388
|
1,438
|
|||||
Accrued
freight
|
1,297
|
1,390
|
|||||
Accrued
property, sales and other taxes
|
1,351
|
831
|
|||||
Foreign
currency contracts
|
789
|
616
|
|||||
Interest
rate swaps
|
-
|
1,501
|
|||||
Other
|
7,204
|
6,796
|
|||||
Total
Accrued Expenses and Current Liabilities
|
$
|
52,940
|
$
|
62,384
|
-14-
Note
11 - Product
Warranties
The
Company's products are under warranty against defects in material and
workmanship for a maximum of two years. We have established accruals to cover
future warranty costs of approximately $5,856 and $6,450 as of May 31, 2007
and
February 28, 2007, respectively. We estimate our warranty accrual using
historical trends, which we believe are the most reliable method by which we
can
estimate our warranty liability.
The
following table summarizes the activity in the Company's accrual for the three
month
period
ended May 31, 2007 and fiscal year ended February 28, 2007:
ACCRUAL
FOR WARRANTY RETURNS
|
(in
thousands)
|
|||||||
May
31, 2007 |
February
28, 2007 |
||||||
(Three
Months)
|
(Year)
|
||||||
Balance
at the beginning of the period
|
$
|
6,450
|
$
|
7,373
|
|||
Additions
to the accrual
|
5,607
|
18,080
|
|||||
Reductions
of the accrual - payments and credits issued
|
(6,201
|
)
|
(19,003
|
)
|
|||
Balance
at the end of the period
|
$
|
5,856
|
$
|
6,450
|
Note
12 - Income
Taxes
Hong
Kong Income Taxes
- On May
10, 2006, the Inland Revenue Department (the “IRD”) of Hong Kong and the Company
reached a settlement regarding tax liabilities for the fiscal years 1995 through
1997. This agreement was subsequently approved by the IRD’s Board of Review. For
those tax years, we agreed to an assessment of approximately $4,019 including
estimated penalties and interest. Our consolidated financial statements at
May
31, 2006 and February 28, 2006 included adequate provisions for this liability.
As a result of this tax settlement, in the first quarter of fiscal 2007, we
reversed $192 of tax provision previously established and recorded $279 of
associated interest. During the second quarter of fiscal 2007, the liability
was
paid with $3,282 of tax reserve certificates and the balance in
cash.
For
the
fiscal years 1998 through 2003, the IRD has assessed a total of $25,461 (U.S.)
in tax on certain profits of our foreign subsidiaries. Hong Kong is seeking
to
levy taxes on income earned from certain activities previously conducted
in Hong
Kong. Negotiations with the IRD regarding these issues and their settlement
are
ongoing, and it is unclear at this time when they will be resolved.
In
connection with the IRD's tax assessment for the fiscal years 1998 through
2003,
we have purchased tax reserve certificates in Hong Kong totaling $25,144.
Tax
reserve certificates represent the prepayment by a taxpayer of potential
tax
liabilities. The amounts paid for tax reserve certificates are refundable
in the
event that the value of the tax reserve certificates exceeds the related
tax
liability. These certificates are denominated in Hong Kong dollars and are
subject to the risks associated with foreign currency fluctuations.
If
the
IRD were to successfully assert the same position for fiscal years after
fiscal
year 2003, the resulting assessment could total $18,673 (U.S.) in taxes for
fiscal years 2004 and 2005. Although the final resolution of the proposed
adjustments is uncertain and involves unsettled areas of the law, based on
currently available information, we have provided for our best estimate of
the
total probable tax liability for this matter. While the resolution of the
issue
may result in tax liabilities that are significantly higher or lower than
the
reserves established for this matter, management currently believes that
the
resolution will not have a material effect on our consolidated financial
position or liquidity. However, an unfavorable resolution could have a material
effect on our consolidated results of operations or cash flows in the quarter
in
which an adjustment is recorded or the tax is due or paid.
-15-
Effective
March 2005, we had concluded the conduct of all operating activities in Hong
Kong that we believe were the basis of the IRD’s assessments. Over the course of
the prior year, the Company had moved these activities to China and Macao.
The
Company established a Macao offshore company (“MOC”) and began operating from
Macao in the third quarter of fiscal 2005. As a MOC, we have been granted an
indefinite tax holiday and currently pay no taxes.
United
States Income Taxes
- The
IRS is auditing our U.S. consolidated federal tax returns for fiscal years
2003
and 2004 and has provided notice of proposed adjustments of $5,953 to taxes
for
the years under audit. The Company is vigorously contesting these adjustments.
Although the ultimate outcome of the dispute with the IRS cannot be predicted
with certainty, management is of the opinion that adequate provisions for taxes
in those years have been made in our consolidated financial statements.
The
IRS
recently began an examination of the U.S. consolidated federal tax return for
fiscal year 2005. The audit is in the preliminary stages and, to date, no
adjustments have been proposed.
Income
Tax Provisions
- We
must make certain estimates and judgments in determining income tax expense
for
financial statement purposes. These estimates and judgments must be used in
the
calculation of certain tax assets and liabilities because of differences in
the
timing of recognition of revenue and expense for tax and financial statement
purposes. We must assess the likelihood that we will be able to recover our
deferred tax assets. If recovery is not likely, we must increase our provision
for taxes by recording a valuation allowance against the deferred tax assets
that we estimate will not ultimately be recoverable. As changes occur in our
assessments regarding our ability to recover our deferred tax assets, our tax
provision is increased in any period in which we determine that the recovery
is
not probable.
In
1994,
we engaged in a corporate restructuring that, among other things, resulted
in a
greater portion of our income not being subject to taxation in the United
States. If such income were subject to U.S. federal income taxes, our effective
income tax rate would increase materially. The American Jobs Creation Act of
2004 (the “AJCA”), included an anti-inversion provision that denies certain tax
benefits to companies that have reincorporated outside the United States after
March 4, 2003. We completed our reincorporation in 1994; therefore, our
transaction is grandfathered by the AJCA, and we expect to continue to benefit
from our current structure.
-16-
Uncertainty
in Income Taxes
- The
calculation of our tax liabilities involves dealing with uncertainties in the
application of other complex tax regulations. We recognize liabilities for
anticipated tax audit issues in the United States and other tax jurisdictions
based on our estimate of whether, and the extent to which, additional taxes
will
be due. If we ultimately determine that payment of these amounts are not
probable, we reverse the liability and recognize a tax benefit during the period
in which we determine that the liability is no longer probable. We record an
additional charge in our provision for taxes in the period in which we determine
that the recorded tax liability is less than we expect the ultimate assessment
to be.
Effective
March 1, 2007, we adopted FIN 48, which provides guidance for the recognition,
derecognition and measurement in financial statements of tax positions taken
in
previously filed tax returns or tax positions expected to be taken in tax
returns. FIN 48 requires an entity to recognize the financial statement impact
of a tax position when it is more likely than not that the position will be
sustained upon examination. If the tax position meets the more-likely-than-not
recognition threshold, the tax effect is recognized at the largest amount of
the
benefit that has
greater than a fifty percent likelihood of being realized upon ultimate
settlement. FIN 48 also provides guidance for classification, interest and
penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure, and transition. FIN 48
requires that a liability created for unrecognized tax benefits shall be
presented as a liability and not combined with deferred tax liabilities or
assets.
Upon
adopting FIN 48, we recorded a $12,055 increase in the liability for
unrecognized tax benefits (including interest and penalties), and corresponding
reductions to retained earnings and additional paid-in-capital in the amounts
of
$5,911 and $6,144, respectively. Amounts charged against additional
paid-in-capital related to the tax effect of stock compensation expense that
was
originally recorded as an increase to paid-in-capital.
Upon
adoption of FIN 48, we had approximately $39,387 of total gross unrecognized
tax
benefits, of which $32,913 would impact the effective tax rate, if recognized.
With the adoption of FIN 48, we recognize interest and penalties accrued related
to unrecognized tax benefits in the provision for income taxes. Included in
our
total gross unrecognized tax benefits we had approximately $4,783 accrued for
penalties and $307 accrued for interest, net of tax benefits. We file income
tax
returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction, and various states and foreign
jurisdictions. As of March 1, 2007, tax years under examination or still subject
to examination by major tax jurisdictions, for our most significant subsidiaries
were as follows:
Jurisdicton
|
Examinations
in Process
|
Open
Years
|
||||||
Hong
Kong
|
1998-
2003
|
2004
|
-
|
2007
|
||||
Mexico
|
-
None -
|
2003
|
-
|
2007
|
||||
United
Kingdom
|
2005
|
2006
|
-
|
2007
|
||||
United
States
|
2003-
2005
|
2006
|
-
|
2007
|
We
anticipate that it is reasonably possible that the total amount of unrecognized
tax benefits may materially change by the end of fiscal 2008 due to issues
pending settlement with the IRS. Depending on the outcome of the settlement
negotiations, estimates including accrued penalties and interest, net of tax
benefits where applicable, range from a $7,600 decrease to a $11,600
increase in unrecognized tax benefits.
-17-
Note
13 - Long
Term-Debt
A
summary
of long-term debt was as follows:
LONG
TERM DEBT
|
(in
thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Range
of Interest Rates
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Original
Date Borrowed
|
Quarter
Ended May 31, 2007
|
Fiscal
2007
|
Latest
Rate Payable
|
Matures
|
May
31,
2007
|
February
28,
2007
|
||||||||||||||||
$40,000
unsecured Senior Note Payable at a
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
fixed
interest rate of 7.01%. Interest payable
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
quarterly,
principal of $10,000 payable
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
annually
beginning on January 2005.
|
01/96
|
7.01
|
%
|
7.01%
|
|
7.01
|
%
|
01/08
|
$
|
10,000
|
$
|
10,000
|
||||||||||
$15,000
unsecured Senior Note Payable at a
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
fixed
interest rate of 7.24%. Interest payable
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
quarterly,
principal of $3,000 payable
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
annually
beginning on July 2008.
|
07/97
|
7.24
|
%
|
7.24%
|
|
7.24
|
%
|
07/12
|
15,000
|
15,000
|
||||||||||||
$100,000
unsecured floating interest rate 5
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Year
Senior Notes. Interest set and payable
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
quarterly
at three-month LIBOR plus 85 basis
|
5.37%
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
points.
Principal is due at maturity. Notes
|
to
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
can
be prepaid without penalty. (1)
|
06/04
|
5.89
|
%
|
6.35%
|
|
5.89
|
%
|
06/09
|
100,000
|
100,000
|
||||||||||||
$50,000
unsecured floating interest rate 7
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Year
Senior Notes. Interest set and payable
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
quarterly
at three-month LIBOR plus 85 basis
|
5.37%
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
points.
Principal is due at maturity. Notes can
|
to
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
be
prepaid without penalty. (1)
|
06/04
|
5.89
|
%
|
6.35%
|
|
5.89
|
%
|
06/11
|
50,000
|
50,000
|
||||||||||||
$75,000
unsecured floating interest rate 10
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Year
Senior Notes. Interest set and payable
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
quarterly
at three-month LIBOR plus 90 basis
|
5.42%
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
points.
Principal is due at maturity. Notes can
|
to
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
be
prepaid without penalty. (1)
|
06/04
|
6.01
|
%
|
6.40%
|
|
6.01
|
%
|
06/14
|
75,000
|
75,000
|
||||||||||||
250,000
|
250,000
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Less
current portion of long-term debt
|
(10,000
|
)
|
(10,000
|
)
|
||||||||||||||||||
Long-term
debt, less current portion
|
$
|
240,000
|
$
|
240,000
|
(1) Floating
interest rates have been hedged with interest rate swaps to effectively fix
interest rates as discussed later in this note.
-18-
On
September 28, 2006, we entered into interest rate hedge agreements in
conjunction with our outstanding unsecured floating interest rate $100,000,
5
year; $50,000, 7 year; and $75,000, 10 year Senior Notes (the “swaps”). The
swaps are a hedge of the variable LIBOR rates used to reset the floating rates
on the Senior Notes.
The
swaps
effectively fix the interest rates on the 5, 7 and 10 Year Senior Notes at
5.89,
5.89 and 6.01 percent, respectively, beginning September 29, 2006. Under our
swaps, we agree with other parties to exchange quarterly the difference between
fixed-rate and floating-rate interest amounts calculated by reference to
notional amounts that perfectly match our underlying debt. Under these swap
agreements, we pay the fixed rates and receive the floating rates. The swaps
settle quarterly and terminate upon maturity of the related debt. The swaps
are
considered cash flow hedges because they are intended to hedge, and are
effective as a hedge, against variable cash flows.
All
of
our long-term debt is unconditionally guaranteed by either the parent company,
Helen of Troy Limited, and/or certain subsidiaries on a joint and several basis
and has customary covenants covering Debt/EBITDA ratios, fixed charge coverage
ratios, consolidated net worth levels, and other financial requirements. Certain
covenants as of the latest balance sheet date, limit our total outstanding
indebtedness from all sources to no more than 3.5 times the latest twelve months
trailing EBITDA. These covenants effectively limited our ability to incur no
more than $66,923 of additional debt from all sources, including draws on our
Revolving Line of Credit Agreement. Additionally, our debt agreements restrict
us from incurring liens on any of our properties, except under certain
conditions. As of May 31, 2007, we are in compliance with all the terms of
these
agreements.
-19-
The
following table contains a summary of the components of our interest expense
for
the periods covered by our consolidated condensed statements of
income:
INTEREST
EXPENSE
|
(in
thousands)
|
|||||||
Three
Months Ended May 31,
|
|||||||
2007
|
2006
|
||||||
Interest
and commitment fees
|
$
|
4,098
|
$
|
4,317
|
|||
Deferred
finance costs
|
182
|
189
|
|||||
Interest
rate swap settlements
|
(167
|
)
|
-
|
||||
Total
interest expense
|
$
|
4,113
|
$
|
4,506
|
Note
14 - Contractual
Obligations
Our
contractual obligations and commercial commitments, as of May 31, 2007 were:
PAYMENTS
DUE BY PERIOD - TWELVE MONTHS ENDED MAY
31:
|
(in
thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
2008
|
|
2009
|
|
2010
|
|
2011
|
|
2012
|
|
After
|
|
|||||||||
|
|
Total
|
|
1
year
|
|
2
years
|
|
3
years
|
|
4
years
|
|
5
years
|
|
5
years
|
||||||||
Term
debt - fixed rate
|
$
|
25,000
|
$
|
10,000
|
$
|
3,000
|
$
|
3,000
|
$
|
3,000
|
$
|
3,000
|
$
|
3,000
|
||||||||
Term
debt - floating rate (1) (2)
|
225,000
|
-
|
-
|
100,000
|
-
|
50,000
|
75,000
|
|||||||||||||||
Long-term
incentive plan payouts
|
2,614
|
1,611
|
843
|
160
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||||||||
Interest
on floating rate debt (1)
|
56,226
|
13,343
|
13,343
|
7,943
|
7,453
|
4,753
|
9,391
|
|||||||||||||||
Interest
on fixed rate debt
|
3,861
|
1,553
|
896
|
679
|
462
|
244
|
27
|
|||||||||||||||
Open
purchase orders
|
80,096
|
80,096
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||||||||
Minimum
royalty payments
|
69,713
|
2,636
|
6,840
|
8,393
|
8,110
|
7,800
|
35,934
|
|||||||||||||||
Advertising
and promotional
|
72,921
|
9,237
|
5,797
|
7,542
|
7,199
|
7,366
|
35,780
|
|||||||||||||||
Operating
leases
|
11,692
|
1,915
|
1,170
|
1,236
|
928
|
943
|
5,500
|
|||||||||||||||
Open
letters of credit pending settlement
|
1,063
|
1,063
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||||||||
Other
|
250
|
250
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||||||||
Total
contractual obligations
|
$
|
548,436
|
$
|
121,704
|
$
|
31,889
|
$
|
128,953
|
$
|
27,152
|
$
|
74,106
|
$
|
164,632
|
(1) |
The
future obligation for interest on our variable rate debt has historically
been estimated assuming the rates in effect as of the end of the
latest
fiscal quarter on which we are reporting. As mentioned above in Note
13,
on September 28, 2006, the Company entered into interest rate hedge
agreements in conjunction with its outstanding unsecured floating
interest
rate $100,000, 5 year; $50,000, 7 year; and $75,000, 10 year Senior
Notes
(the “swaps”). The swaps are a hedge of the variable LIBOR rates used to
reset the floating rates on the Senior Notes. The swaps effectively
fix
the interest rates on the 5, 7 and 10 year Senior Notes at 5.89,
5.89 and
6.01 percent, respectively, beginning September 29, 2006. Accordingly,
the
future interest obligations related to this debt has been estimated
using
these rates. On
June 8, 2007, we amended our interest rate swap agreement, concurrent
with
a notice to prepay $25,000 of our $100,000 5 year floating rate Senior
notes, reducing the notional amount of the swap contracts from $100,000
to
$75,000, and recording a gain of $163 upon the liquidation of our
position
in $25,000 of swaps. The gain will be recorded as a component of
“Interest
expense” for the fiscal quarter ending August 31, 2007. The remaining
interest rate swaps are considered highly effective and will continue
to
be accounted for as cash flow
hedges.
|
-20-
(2) |
On
June 8, 2007, we gave notice to prepay $25,000 of our $100,000, 5
year
floating rate Senior Notes without penalty. This prepayment was made
on
June 29, 2007. The amount prepaid will reduce the amount due in June
2009
from $100,000 to $75,000.
|
We
lease
certain facilities, equipment and vehicles under operating leases, which expire
at various dates through fiscal 2017. Certain of the leases contain escalation
clauses and renewal or purchase options.
Rent
expense related to our operating leases was $675 and $1,073 for the three
month
periods ended May 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
Note
15 - Foreign
Currency Contracts and Interest Rate Swaps
Our
functional currency is the U.S. Dollar. By operating internationally, we are
subject to foreign currency risk from transactions denominated in currencies
other than the U.S. Dollar ("foreign currencies"). Such transactions include
sales, certain inventory purchases and operating expenses. As a result of such
transactions, portions of our cash, trade accounts receivable, and trade
accounts payable are denominated in foreign currencies. During the three
month
periods
ended May 31, 2007 and 2006, we transacted approximately 15 percent of our
net
sales in foreign currencies. These sales were primarily denominated in the
British Pound, the Euro, the Canadian Dollar, the Brazilian Real and the Mexican
Peso. We make most of our inventory purchases from the Far East and use the
U.S.
Dollar for such purchases.
We
identify foreign currency risk by regularly monitoring our foreign
currency-denominated transactions and balances. Where operating conditions
permit, we reduce foreign currency risk by purchasing most of our inventory
with
U.S. Dollars and by converting cash balances denominated in foreign currencies
to U.S. Dollars.
We
also
hedge against foreign currency exchange rate-risk by using a series of forward
contracts designated as cash flow hedges to protect against the foreign currency
exchange risk inherent in our forecasted transactions denominated in currencies
other than the U.S. Dollar. In these transactions, we execute a forward currency
contract that will settle at the end of a forecasted period. Because the size
and terms of the forward contract are designed so that its fair market value
will move in the opposite direction and approximate magnitude of the underlying
foreign currency’s forecasted exchange gain or loss during the forecasted
period, a hedging relationship is created. To the extent we forecast the
expected foreign currency cash flows from the period the forward contract is
entered into until the date it will settle with reasonable accuracy, we
significantly lower or materially eliminate a particular currency’s exchange
risk exposure over the life of the related forward contract.
For
transactions designated as foreign currency cash flow hedges, the effective
portion of the change in the fair value (arising from the change in the spot
rates from period to period) is deferred in other comprehensive income. These
amounts are subsequently recognized in "Selling, general, and administrative
expense" in the consolidated statements of income in the same period as the
forecasted transactions close out over the remaining balance of their terms.
The
ineffective portion of the change in fair value (arising from the change in
the
difference between the spot rate and the forward rate) is recognized in the
period it occurred. These amounts are also recognized in "Selling, general,
and
administrative expense" in the consolidated statements of income. We do not
enter into any forward exchange contracts or similar instruments for trading
or
other speculative purposes.
During
the third quarter of fiscal 2007, we decided to manage our floating rate debt
using interest rate swaps (the “swaps”). We entered into three interest rate
swaps that converted an aggregate notional principal of $225,000 from floating
interest rate payments under our 5, 7 and 10 year Senior Notes to fixed interest
rate payments ranging from 5.89 to 6.01 percent. In these transactions, we
executed three contracts to pay fixed rates of interest on an aggregate notional
principal amount of $225,000 at rates ranging from 5.04 to 5.11 percent while
simultaneously receiving floating rate interest payments set at 5.35 percent
as
of May 31, 2007 on the same notional amount. The fixed rate side of the swap
will not change over the life of the swap. The floating rate payments are reset
quarterly based on three month LIBOR. The resets are concurrent with the
interest payments made on the underlying debt. These swaps are used to reduce
the Company’s risk of the possibility of increased interest costs; however,
should interest rates drop significantly, we could also lose the benefit that
floating rate debt can provide in a declining interest rate
environment.
-21-
The
swaps
are considered highly effective. Unrealized gains and losses related to the
swaps, net of related tax effects are reported as a component of “Accumulated
other comprehensive income” and will not be reclassified into earnings until the
conclusion of the hedge. A partial net settlement occurs quarterly concurrent
with interest payments made on the underlying debt. The settlement is the net
difference between the fixed rates payable and the floating rates receivable
over the quarter under the swap contracts. The settlement is recognized as
a
component of "Interest expense" in the consolidated statements of
income.
The
following table summarizes the various foreign currency contracts and interest
rate swap contracts we designated as cash flow hedges that were open at May
31,
2007 and February 28, 2007:
CASH
FLOW HEDGES
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
May
31, 2007
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Contract
|
Currency
to
|
Notional
|
Contract
|
Range of Maturities
|
Spot
Rate at Contract
|
Spot
Rate at May 31,
|
Weighted
Average Forward Rate
|
Weighted
Average Forward Rate at May 31,
|
Market
Value of the Contract in U.S. Dollars
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Type
|
Deliver
|
Amount
|
Date
|
From
|
To
|
Date
|
2007
|
at
Inception
|
2007
|
(Thousands)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Foreign
Currency Contracts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
Sell
|
|
Pounds
|
|
|
£10,000,000
|
|
|
5/12/2006
|
|
|
12/14/2007
|
|
|
2/14/2008
|
|
|
1.8940
|
|
|
1.9796
|
|
|
1.9010
|
|
|
1.9709
|
|
|
($699
|
)
|
|
Sell
|
|
Pounds
|
|
|
£5,000,000
|
|
|
11/28/2006
|
|
|
12/11/2008
|
|
|
1/15/2009
|
|
|
1.9385
|
|
|
1.9796
|
|
|
1.9242
|
|
|
1.9550
|
|
|
($154
|
)
|
|
Sell
|
|
Pounds
|
|
|
£5,000,000
|
|
|
4/17/2007
|
|
|
2/17/2009
|
|
|
8/17/2009
|
|
|
2.0000
|
|
|
1.9796
|
|
|
1.9644
|
|
|
1.9517
|
|
|
$64
|
|
|
Subtotal
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($789
|
)
|
Interest
Rate Swap Contracts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Swap
|
|
Dollars
|
|
|
$100,000,000
|
|
|
9/28/2006
|
|
6/29/2009
|
(Pay
fixed rate at 5.04%, receive floating rate at 5.35%)
|
$359
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
Swap
|
|
Dollars
|
|
|
$50,000,000
|
|
|
9/28/2006
|
|
6/29/2011
|
(Pay
fixed rate at 5.04%, receive floating rate at 5.35%)
|
|
$330
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Swap
|
|
Dollars
|
|
|
$75,000,000
|
|
|
9/28/2006
|
|
6/29/2014
|
(Pay
fixed rate at 5.11%, receive floating rate at 5.35%)
|
|
$750
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Subtotal
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$1,439
|
|
Fair
Value of Cash Flow Hedges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$650
|
|
February
28, 2007
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Contract
|
Currency
to
|
Notional
|
Contract
|
Range
of Maturities
|
Spot
Rate at Contract
|
Spot
Rate at Feb. 28,
|
Weighted
Average Forward Rate at
|
Weighted
Average Forward Rate at
|
Market
Value of the Contract in U.S. Dollars
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Type
|
Deliver
|
Amount
|
Date
|
From
|
To
|
Date
|
2007
|
Inception
|
Feb.
28, 2007
|
(Thousands)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Foreign
Currency Contracts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
Sell
|
|
Pounds
|
|
|
£10,000,000
|
|
|
5/12/2006
|
|
|
12/14/2007
|
|
|
2/14/2008
|
|
|
1.8940
|
|
|
1.9636
|
|
|
1.9010
|
|
|
1.9543
|
|
|
($533
|
)
|
|
Sell
|
|
Pounds
|
|
|
£5,000,000
|
|
|
11/28/2006
|
|
|
12/11/2008
|
|
|
1/15/2009
|
|
|
1.9385
|
|
|
1.9636
|
|
|
1.9242
|
|
|
1.9408
|
|
|
($83
|
)
|
|
Subtotal
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($616
|
)
|
Interest
Rate Swap Contracts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Swap
|
|
Dollars
|
|
|
$100,000,000
|
|
|
9/28/2006
|
|
6/29/2009
|
(Pay
fixed rate at 5.04%, receive floating rate at 5.36%)
|
|
($326
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||||
Swap
|
|
Dollars
|
|
|
$50,000,000
|
|
|
9/28/2006
|
|
6/29/2011
|
(Pay
fixed rate at 5.04%, receive floating rate at 5.36%)
|
|
($342
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||||
Swap
|
|
Dollars
|
|
|
$75,000,000
|
|
|
9/28/2006
|
|
6/29/2014
|
(Pay
fixed rate at 5.11%, receive floating rate at 5.36%)
|
|
($833
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||||
Subtotal
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($1,501
|
)
|
Fair
Value of Cash Flow Hedges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($2,117
|
)
|
The
Company is exposed to credit risk in the event of non-performance by the other
party (a large financial institution) to its current existing forward and swap
contracts. However, the Company does not anticipate non-performance by the
other
party.
Note
16 - Repurchase
of Helen of Troy Shares
During
the quarter ended August 31, 2003, our Board of Directors approved a resolution
authorizing the purchase, in open market or through private transactions, of
up
to 3,000,000 common shares over an initial period extending through May 31,
2006. On April 25, 2006, our Board of Directors approved a resolution to extend
the existing plan to May 31, 2009. During the fiscal quarters ended May 31,
2007
and 2006, respectively, we did not repurchase any common shares. From September
1, 2003 through May 31, 2007, we have repurchased 1,563,836 shares at a total
cost of $45,612, or an average price per share of $29.17. An additional
1,436,164 shares remain authorized for purchase under this plan.
-22-
Note
17 - Share-Based
Compensation Plans
The
Company has equity awards outstanding under four share-based compensation plans.
The plans consist of two employee stock option and restricted stock plans,
a
non-employee director stock option plan, and an employee stock purchase plan.
The plans are generally administered by the Compensation Committee of the Board
of Directors, consisting of non-employee directors.
Under
stock option and restricted stock plans adopted in 1994 and 1998, as amended
(the "1994 Plan" and the "1998 Plan," respectively), we have reserved a total
of
14,750,000 common shares for issuance to key officers and employees. Under
these
plans, we grant options to purchase our common shares at a price equal to or
greater than the fair market value on the grant date. Both plans contain
provisions for incentive stock options, non-qualified stock options and
restricted share grants. Generally, options granted under the 1994 Plan and
the
1998 Plan become exercisable immediately or over one-, four-, or five-year
vesting periods and expire on dates ranging from seven to ten years from the
date of grant. As of May 31, 2007, 238,786 shares remained available for issue
under the 1998 plan and options for 6,685,808 common shares were outstanding
under these plans. The 1998 Plan will terminate in August of 2008.
Under
a
stock option plan for non-employee directors (the "Directors’ Plan") adopted in
fiscal 1996, we reserved a total of 980,000 of our common shares for issuance
to
non-employee members of the Board of Directors. We granted options under the
Directors' Plan at a price equal to the fair market value of our common shares
at the date of grant. Options granted under the Directors' Plan vest one year
from the date of issuance and expire ten years after issuance. The Directors’
Plan expired by its terms on June 6, 2005. As of May 31, 2007, options for
260,000 common shares were outstanding under this plan.
Under
an
employee stock purchase plan (the "Stock Purchase Plan"), we have reserved
a
total of 500,000 common shares for issuance to our employees, nearly all of
whom
are eligible to participate. Under the terms of the Stock Purchase Plan,
employees authorize the withholding of up to 15 percent of their wages or
salaries to purchase our common shares. The purchase price for shares acquired
under the Stock Purchase Plan is equal to the lower of 85 percent of the share’s
fair market value on either the first day of each option period or the last
day
of each period. No shares were issued during the fiscal quarter ended May 31,
2007, and as of that date, 307,386 shares remained available for future issue
under the plan. The Stock Purchase Plan will terminate in July of
2008.
-23-
The
Company recorded stock-based compensation expense in selling, general and
administrative expense for the three months ended May 31, 2007 and 2006,
respectively, as follows:
SHARE
BASED PAYMENT EXPENSE
(in
thousands, except per share data)
|
|||||||
Three
Months Ended May 31,
|
|||||||
2007
|
|
2006
|
|||||
Stock
options
|
$
|
190
|
$
|
187
|
|||
Employee
stock purchase plan
|
-
|
-
|
|||||
Share-based
payment expense
|
$
|
190
|
$
|
187
|
|||
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
Share-based
payment expense, net of income tax benefits of $51 and $40
|
|||||||
for
the three months ended May 31, 2007 and 2006,
respectively.
|
$
|
139
|
$
|
147
|
|||
Earnings
per share impact of share based payment expense:
|
|||||||
Basic
|
$
|
0.00
|
$
|
0.00
|
|||
Diluted
|
$
|
0.00
|
$
|
0.00
|
The
fair
value of all share-based payment awards are estimated using the Black-Scholes
option pricing model with the following assumptions and weighted average fair
values for the three month
periods
ended May 31, 2007 and 2006:
FAIR
VALUE OF AWARDS AND ASSUMPTIONS USED
|
|||||||
Three
Months Ended May 31,
|
|||||||
2007
|
|
2006
|
|||||
Weighted
average fair value of grants (in
dollars)
|
$
|
9.23
|
$
|
8.22
|
|||
Risk
free interest rate
|
4.65
|
%
|
4.32
|
%
|
|||
Dividend
yield
|
0.00
|
%
|
0.00
|
%
|
|||
Expected
volatility
|
37.21
|
%
|
40.21
|
%
|
|||
Weighted
average expected life (in
years)
|
3.89
|
4.32
|
The
following describes how certain assumptions affecting the estimated fair value
of options or discounted employee share purchases (“share based payments”) are
determined. The risk-free interest rate is based on U.S. Treasury securities
with maturities equal to the expected life of the share based payments. The
dividend yield is computed as zero because the Company has not historically
paid
dividends nor does it expect to at this time. Expected volatility is based
on a
weighted average of the market implied volatility and historical volatility
over
the expected life of the underlying share based payments. The Company uses
its
historical experience to estimate the expected life of each stock-option grant
and also to estimate the impact of exercise, forfeitures, termination and
holding period behavior for fair value expensing purposes.
Employee
share purchases vest immediately at the time of purchase. Accordingly, the
fair
value award associated with their discounted purchase price is expensed at
the
time of purchase.
-24-
A
summary
of option activity as of May 31, 2007, and changes during the three months
then
ended is as follows:
SUMMARY
OF STOCK OPTION ACTIVITY
(in
thousands, except contractual term and per share
data)
|
||||||||||||||||
Weighted
|
||||||||||||||||
Average
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
Weighted
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
Average
|
|
Contractual
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
Grant
Date
|
|
Term
|
|
Intrinsic
|
|
|||||
|
|
Options
|
Price
|
Fair
Value
|
(in
years)
|
Value
|
||||||||||
Outstanding
at February 28, 2007
|
6,751
|
$
|
15.01
|
$
|
5.57
|
3.87
|
$
|
56,211
|
||||||||
Granted
|
245
|
26.14
|
||||||||||||||
Exercised
|
(42
|
)
|
(18.23
|
)
|
336
|
|||||||||||
Forfeited
/ expired
|
(8
|
)
|
(16.10
|
)
|
||||||||||||
Outstanding
at May 31, 2007
|
6,946
|
$
|
15.39
|
$
|
5.70
|
3.78
|
$
|
83,162
|
||||||||
Exerciseable
at May 31, 2007
|
6,378
|
$
|
14.75
|
$
|
5.47
|
3.41
|
$
|
80,439
|
A
summary
of non-vested option activity as of May 31, 2007, and changes during the three
month period then ended is as follows:
NON-VESTED
STOCK OPTION ACTIVITY
(in thousands, except per share data) | |||||||
Weighted
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|||
Non-Vested
|
|
Grant
Date
|
|
||||
|
|
Options
|
Fair
Value
|
||||
Outstanding
at February 28, 2007
|
344
|
$
|
7.41
|
||||
Granted
|
245
|
9.23
|
|||||
Vested
or forfeited
|
(21
|
)
|
(5.04
|
)
|
|||
Outstanding
at May 31, 2007
|
568
|
$
|
8.28
|
A
summary
of the Company’s total unrecognized share-based compensation cost as of May 31,
2007 is as follows:
UNRECOGNIZED
SHARE BASED COMPENSATION EXPENSE
(in thousands, except weighted average expense period data) | |||||||
Weighted
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
Period
of Expense
|
|
||
|
|
Unearned
|
|
Recognition
|
|
||
|
|
Compensation
|
|
(in
months)
|
|||
Stock
options
|
$
|
3,794
|
49.5
|
-25-
Note
18 - Prepayment
of Debt, Reduction of Revolving Line of Credit Commitment and Associated
Transactions
On
June
8, 2007, we gave notice to prepay $25,000 of our $100,000, 5 year floating
rate
Senior Notes without penalty. This prepayment was made on June 29, 2007. On
June
8, concurrent with the notice to prepay, we amended a related interest rate
swap
agreement, reducing the notional amount of the swap contracts from $100,000
to
$75,000, and recording a gain of $163 upon the liquidation of our position
in
$25,000 of swaps. The gain will be recorded as a component of “Interest expense”
for the fiscal quarter ending August 31, 2007. The remaining interest rate
swaps
are considered highly effective and will continue to be accounted for as cash
flow hedges.
Also,
on
June 7, 2007, based upon a review of our expected cash flows, we gave notice
to
permanently reduce our Revolving Line of Credit Agreement commitment by $25,000
to $50,000. The reduction of the commitment will result in a proportionate
decline in the future cost of associated commitment fees under the
facility.
In
connection with the prepayment of debt and the reduction of our Revolving Line
of Credit, we will write off $282 in associated unamortized deferred finance
fees. This expense will be recorded as a component of “Interest expense” for the
fiscal quarter ending August 31, 2007.
-26-
ITEM 2. |
MANAGEMENT'S
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS
|
This
discussion contains a number of forward-looking statements, all of which are
based on current expectations. Actual results may differ materially due to
a
number of factors, including those discussed in Part I, Item 3. "Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk", "Information Regarding Forward
Looking Statements", Part II, Item 1A, “Risk Factors” and in the Company's most
recent Annual Report on Form 10-K. This discussion should be read in conjunction
with our consolidated condensed financial statements included under Part I,
Item
1 of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended May 31,
2007.
OVERVIEW
OF THE QUARTER'S ACTIVITIES:
Our
first
fiscal quarter of each year is our seasonal low point in terms of overall
activity, with sales tending
to average approximately 20 percent of the year's total on a historical basis.
Our second fiscal quarter is normally characterized by stable sales between
June
and the first half of July with increasing sales in the second half of July
through August as we build towards a peak shipping season in the third quarter.
We
evaluate opportunities to grow our business and brand portfolio by acquiring
well-recognized brands from larger consumer products companies, as well as
other
brands from smaller private companies. Historically, the brands we have
purchased from larger consumer products companies have a track record of support
and brand development. We believe that at the time we acquired them they were
considered “non-core” by their previous owners and did not benefit from focused
management or strong marketing support. When we acquire brands from smaller
private companies, we usually do so because we believe they have been
constrained by the limited resources of their prior owners. After acquiring
a
brand, we seek to increase its sales, market share and distribution in both
existing and new channels. We pursue this growth through increased spending
on
advertising and promotion, new marketing strategies, improved packaging and
formulations, and innovative new products.
Effective
May 1, 2007, we acquired certain assets and liabilities of Belson Products
(“Belson”), the professional salon division of Applica Consumer Products, Inc.
for a cash purchase price of $36,500
plus the assumption of certain liabilities.
This
transaction was accounted for as a purchase of business and was paid for out
of
available cash on hand. Belson is a supplier of personal care products to the
professional salon industry. Belson markets its professional products to major
beauty suppliers and other major distributors under brand names, including
Belson®, Belson Pro®, Gold ‘N Hot®, Curlmaster®, Premiere®, Profiles®, Comare®,
Mega Hot®, and Shear Technology®. Products include electrical hair care
appliances, spa products and accessories, professional brushes and combs, and
professional styling shears. Belson products are principally distributed
throughout the United States, as well as Canada and the United Kingdom. We
are
currently integrating the Belson operation into our business structure and
systems and expect to have the integration substantially completed by the end
of
the current fiscal year. We
believe that Belson’s portfolio of professional salon products, in addition to
our existing Helen of Troy professional products, will continue to strengthen
our leadership position in the professional distribution channels.
After
a
year of focus on our domestic distribution infrastructure, we believe we are
now
starting to see the benefits of our investment. Our overall distribution cost
as
a percentage of net sales was 5.2% for the fiscal quarter ended May 31, 2007
compared to 6.2% for the fiscal quarter ended May 31, 2006. Domestic
distribution will continue to remain an area of focus in fiscal 2008 as we
determine the best long-term strategy for managing the additional inventory
we
acquired through the Belson
acquisition.
In
the
first fiscal quarter of 2008, we began efforts to streamline our supply
chain and simplify new product development procedures, particularly in our
Far
East operations. In the Personal Care segment, we are evaluating the sourcing
of
certain fragrance and grooming products in China. In the Housewares segment,
we
are gradually transitioning some of our U.S. based sourcing infrastructure
to
our existing supply chain operations in the Far East. Over the long term, we
believe these efforts are opportunities to improve our cost structure while
maintaining our commitment to offer high quality, affordability, and effective
customer service with the products we ship. However, we do not expect to realize
any material cost savings through these efforts during fiscal 2008.
-27-
Highlights
of the three months ended May 31, 2007 follow:
· |
Consolidated
net sales for the fiscal quarter ended May 31, 2007 increased 7.5
percent
to $140,170 compared to $130,441 for the same period last year. Our
Housewares segment contributed $8,241 or 6.3 percentage points to
net
sales growth, while our Personal Care segment contributed $1,488
or 1.2
percentage points of net sales growth. Our Housewares segment’s first
fiscal quarter performance compares to a weak first fiscal quarter
in the
prior fiscal year when distribution center shipping issues resulted
in an
estimated loss of between $4.5 to $5 million in net sales for the
prior
year fiscal quarter. A portion of these sales were subsequently
shipped in the second fiscal quarter of the prior
year.
|
· |
Consolidated
gross profit margin as a percentage of net sales for the fiscal quarter
ended May 31, 2007 decreased 1.6 percentage points to 42.8 percent
compared to 44.4 percent for the same period last year. Gross margins
in
our core personal care appliance category were relatively flat when
compared to the same period last year. Gross margins in grooming,
skin
care, and hair products, and brushes, combs, and accessories categories
were lower when compared to the same period last year due to the
impact of
higher raw materials costs combined with pricing pressures, including
increased customer incentives. Gross margins for the Housewares segment
were lower due primarily to product mix shifts and higher cost of
goods.
|
· |
Selling,
general and administrative expense as a percentage of net sales for
the
fiscal quarter ended May 31, 2007 decreased 3.5 percentage points
to 32.6
percent compared to 36.1 percent for the same period last year. The
improvement for the three months ended May 31, 2007 compared to the
same
period last year is mostly due to an improved distribution cost structure,
outbound freight cost improvements, and lower information technology
outsourcing costs.
|
· |
Our
financial position continues to strengthen when compared to our financial
position at May 31, 2006. Total assets increased 4.0 percent, or
$34,456
to $902,950 at May 31, 2007 when compared with May 31, 2006. Our
working
capital position improved $28,179 to $226,310 at May 31, 2007 compared
with May 31, 2006. Total current and long-term debt outstanding at
May 31,
2007 was $250,000 compared to $272,634 outstanding at May 31, 2006.
Total
stockholders’ equity was $528,387 at May 31, 2007 compared to $481,515 at
May 31, 2006.
|
-28-
RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS
Comparison
of fiscal quarter ended May 31, 2007 to the same period ended May 31,
2006.
The
following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, our selected operating
data, in U.S. dollars, as a percentage of net sales, and as a year-over-year
percentage change.
SELECTED
OPERATING DATA
(dollars in thousands) | |||||||||||||||||||
Quarter
Ended May 31,
|
%
of Net Sales
|
||||||||||||||||||
2007
|
2006
|
$
Change
|
%
Change
|
2007
|
2006
|
||||||||||||||
Net
sales
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Personal
Care Segment
|
$
|
106,812
|
$
|
105,324
|
$
|
1,488
|
1.4%
|
|
76.2%
|
|
80.7%
|
|
|||||||
Housewares
Segment
|
33,358
|
25,117
|
8,241
|
32.8%
|
|
23.8%
|
|
19.3%
|
|
||||||||||
Total
net sales
|
140,170
|
130,441
|
9,729
|
7.5%
|
|
100.0%
|
|
100.0%
|
|
||||||||||
Cost
of sales
|
80,152
|
72,500
|
7,652
|
10.6%
|
|
57.2%
|
|
55.6%
|
|
||||||||||
Gross
profit
|
60,018
|
57,941
|
2,077
|
3.6%
|
|
42.8%
|
|
44.4%
|
|
||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Selling,
general, and administrative
expense
|
45,717
|
47,025
|
(1,308
|
)
|
-2.8%
|
|
32.6%
|
|
36.1%
|
|
|||||||||
Operating
income
|
14,301
|
10,916
|
3,385
|
31.0%
|
|
10.2%
|
|
8.4%
|
|
||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Other
income (expense):
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Interest
expense
|
(4,113
|
)
|
(4,506
|
)
|
393
|
-8.7%
|
|
-2.9%
|
|
-3.5%
|
|
||||||||
Other
income, net
|
1,254
|
790
|
464
|
58.7%
|
|
0.9%
|
|
0.6%
|
|
||||||||||
Total
other income (expense)
|
(2,859
|
)
|
(3,716
|
)
|
857
|
-23.1%
|
|
-2.0%
|
|
-2.8%
|
|
||||||||
Earnings
before income taxes
|
11,442
|
7,200
|
4,242
|
58.9%
|
|
8.2%
|
|
5.5%
|
|
||||||||||
Income
tax expense
|
1,325
|
521
|
804
|
154.3%
|
|
0.9%
|
|
0.4%
|
|
||||||||||
Net
earnings
|
$
|
10,117
|
$
|
6,679
|
$
|
3,438
|
51.5%
|
|
7.2%
|
|
5.1%
|
|
Consolidated
Sales
Consolidated
net sales for the first fiscal quarter ending May 31, 2007 increased 7.5 percent
to $140,170 compared with $130,441 for the same period last year. Core business
growth (business owned and operated over the same fiscal period last year)
contributed $6,276, or 4.8 percent, to consolidated net sales growth while
new
product acquisitions contributed $3,453, or 2.7 percent, to our consolidated
net
sales growth for the fiscal quarter ending May 31, 2007. New product
acquisitions consisted of one month’s net sales of Belson
line of
professional appliances, acquired as of May 1, 2007, and a small amount of
royalty revenue from our Candela® line of portable cordless lighting products.
The following table sets forth the impact acquisitions had on our net
sales:
IMPACT
OF ACQUISITION ON NET SALES
(in thousands) | |||||||
Three
Months Ended May 31,
|
|||||||
2007
|
2006
|
||||||
Prior
year's net sales for the same period
|
$
|
130,441
|
$
|
127,392
|
|||
Components
of net sales change
|
|||||||
Core
business net sales change
|
6,276
|
3,049
|
|||||
Net
sales from acquisitions (non-core business net sales)
|
3,453
|
-
|
|||||
Change
in net sales
|
9,729
|
3,049
|
|||||
Net
sales
|
$
|
140,170
|
$
|
130,441
|
|||
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
Total
net sales growth
|
7.5%
|
|
2.4%
|
|
|||
Core
business net sales change
|
4.8%
|
|
2.4%
|
|
|||
Net
sales change from acquisitions (non-core business net sales
change)
|
2.7%
|
|
0.0%
|
|
-29-
During
the three month
periods
ended May 31, 2007 and 2006, we transacted approximately 15 percent of our
net
sales in foreign currencies. These sales were primarily denominated in the
British Pound, the Euro, the Canadian Dollar, the Brazilian Real and the Mexican
Peso. The
overall net impact of foreign currency changes was to provide
approximately $830 and $188 of additional sales in U.S. dollars for
the
quarters ended May 31, 2007
and
2006, respectively.
Segment
Net Sales:
Personal
Care Segment
- Net
sales
in the segment for the first fiscal quarter increased 1.4 percent to $106,812
compared with $105,324 for the same period last year. Appliances net sales
were
up, offset by declines in grooming, skin care, and hair products, and brushes,
combs, and accessories.
Domestically,
we operate in mature markets where we compete on product innovation, price,
quality and customer service. We continuously adjust our product mix, pricing
and marketing programs to try to maintain, and in some cases, acquire more
retail shelf space. Changes in product mix are generally allowing us to realize
higher average unit prices, which offset in some categories, unit volume
decreases. Over the last year, the prices of raw materials such as copper,
steel, plastics and alcohol have experienced significant increases. We continue
to evaluate the need to raise prices with our customers and have already put
certain increases into effect. In some cases, we have been successful raising
prices to our customers, or passing cost increases on by moving customers to
newer product models with enhancements that justify a higher price. In other
cases, we have not been successful. Sales price increases and product
enhancements can have long lead times before their impact is realized. We also
continue to evaluate sourcing alternatives for our grooming, skin care, and
hair
products, but do not expect to experience any significant impact of any sourcing
changes that may be made during this fiscal year. The extent to which we will
be
able to continue with price increases or achieve improved sourcing costs, and
the timing and the ultimate impact of such changes on net sales and cost of
sales is uncertain. Accordingly, we have experienced margin pressure in this
segment, particularly within grooming, skin care, and hair products, and
brushes, combs, and accessories categories.
· |
Appliances.
Products in this group include hair dryers, straighteners, curling
irons,
hairsetters, women’s shavers, mirrors, hot air brushes, home hair clippers
and trimmers, paraffin baths, massage cushions, footbaths and body
massagers. Net sales for the three month period ended May 31, 2007
increased approximately 5.4 percent over the same period in the prior
year.
|
For
the
quarter, increases in unit sales volume contributed approximately 5.1 percent
to
net sales growth while increases in average selling prices contributed 0.3
percent to net sales growth. Average unit selling prices were lower than we
would have expected primarily due to the impact of the newly acquired Belson
appliance lines, which currently sell at lower retail price points overall
than
our existing professional appliances. A higher percentage of Belson’s sales are
on a direct import basis. Direct import sales have lower unit sales prices
and
lower gross margins, which are expected due to the lower selling, general,
and
administrative expense associated with this type of
distribution.
Appliance
sales during the first fiscal quarter were positively impacted by sales under
both our Bed Head® and Fusion Tools™ appliance brands, which where not available
for shipment during the fiscal quarter ended May 31, 2006. These professional
grade appliances sold at significantly higher price points than our more
traditional retail appliances and contributed to our higher average unit selling
price. Sales of our Hot Tools® appliances, were also up significantly for the
first fiscal quarter when compared to same period last year.
Revlon®,
Vidal Sassoon®, Hot Tools®, Dr. Scholl's®, Bed Head®, Gold ‘N Hot®, Fusion
Tools™, Wigo®, Sunbeam®, and Health o Meter® were key selling brands in this
line.
Grooming,
Skin Care, and Hair Products.
Products in this line include liquid hair styling products, men’s fragrances,
men’s deodorants, foot powder, body powder, and skin care products. Our
grooming, skin care, and hair care portfolio includes the Brut®, Sea Breeze®,
Vitalis®, Condition® 3-in-1, Ammens®, Final Net® and Skin Milk® brand names. Net
sales for the three month period ended May 31, 2007 decreased approximately
2.8
percent when compared against the same period in the prior year.
-30-
For
the
quarter, increases in unit sales volume contributed approximately 4.1 percent
to
net sales growth offset by a 6.9 percent decline in average unit selling prices.
Most of the unit volume sales increase in this line for the first fiscal quarter
came from our Latin American region. Unit growth continued to result from the
performance of Brut® throughout the region. Average unit selling prices in Latin
America have been decreasing due to the impact of promotional price allowances
being granted as we seek to expand market share throughout the region. Domestic
net sales for the quarter, while experiencing modest overall unit volume
increases were negatively impacted by the discontinuance of the Sea Breeze®
Naturals line with certain key customers and the associated sales returns and
allowances granted to retailers as a result.
· |
Brushes,
Combs, and Accessories.
Net sales for the three month period ended May 31, 2007 decreased
21.8
percent when compared to the same period in the prior year. A combination
of sluggish sales in the mass retail channel, the discontinuance
of a
private label program with a large drug retailer and the loss of
placement
with a key distributor were significant contributing factors to the
decline. BED HEAD® by TIGI products began to ship during the fiscal
quarter ended May 31, 2007. We believe BED HEAD® sales, while not yet
significant, will provide opportunities for additional sales in this
product category.
|
Vidal
Sassoon®, Revlon® and Karina® were the key selling brands in this line.
Housewares
Segment -
Our
Housewares segment reports the operations of OXO International (“OXO”) whose
products include kitchen tools, cutlery, bar and wine accessories, household
cleaning tools, tea kettles, trash cans, storage and organization products,
hand
tools, gardening tools, kitchen mitts and trivets, barbeque tools, and
rechargeable lighting products.
Net
sales
in the segment for the first fiscal quarter increased 32.8 percent to $33,358
compared with $25,117 for the same period last year. Our Housewares segment’s
first fiscal quarter performance compares to a weak first fiscal quarter in
the
prior fiscal year when distribution center shipping issues resulted in an
estimated loss of between $4.5 to $5 million in net sales for prior year fiscal
quarter. A portion of these sales were subsequently shipped in the
second fiscal quarter of the prior year.
For
the
quarter, increases in unit sales volume contributed approximately 21.7 percent
to net sales growth while increases in average selling prices contributed 11.1
percent to net sales growth. Unit prices increased during the quarter because
the Houseware segment’s business has been expanding its product mix to include
higher priced goods, such as trash cans, tea kettles, and hand tools. Unit
volumes increased primarily due to improved distribution execution,
growth with existing accounts, and our continued expansion of net sales in
the
United Kingdom and Japan. OXO Good Grips®, OXO SoftWorks® and OXO Steel® were
the key selling sub-brands in this product group.
We
expect
shipments of our new Good Grips® POP modular line of food storage containers and
a re-staged line of Candela® portable, cordless, rechargeable table and
counter-top ambience lighting products to begin during the third quarter of
fiscal 2008.
Consolidated
Gross Profit Margins
Consolidated
gross profit, as a percentage of sales for the three month period ended May
31,
2007, decreased 1.6 percentage points to 42.8 percent compared to 44.4 percent
for the same period in the prior year. Margins in our core personal care
appliance category were relatively flat when compared to the same period last
year. Margins in grooming, skin care, and hair products, and brushes, combs,
and
accessories categories were lower when compared to the same period last year
primarily due to the impact of higher raw materials costs combined with pricing
pressures, including increased customer incentives. Margins for the Housewares
segment were lower due to product mix shifts and higher cost of
goods.
-31-
Selling,
general, and administrative expense
Selling,
general and administrative expense as a percentage of net sales for the fiscal
quarter ended May 31, 2007 decreased 3.5 percentage points to 32.6 percent
compared to 36.1 percent for the same period last year. The improvement for
the
three months ended May 31, 2007 when compared to the same period last year
is
mostly due to an improved distribution cost structure, outbound freight cost
improvements, and lower information technology outsourcing costs.
Operating
Income by Segment:
The
following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, our operating income
by
segment, as a percentage of net sales, and as a year-over-year percentage
change:
OPERATING
INCOME BY SEGMENT
(dollars in thousands) | |||||||||||||||||||
Quarter
Ended May 31,
|
%
of Segment Net Sales
|
||||||||||||||||||
2007
|
2006
|
$
Change
|
%
Change
|
2007
|
2006
|
||||||||||||||
Personal
Care
|
$
|
8,872
|
$
|
6,192
|
$
|
2,680
|
43.3%
|
|
8.3%
|
|
5.9%
|
|
|||||||
Housewares
|
5,429
|
4,724
|
705
|
14.9%
|
|
16.3%
|
|
18.8%
|
|
||||||||||
Total
operating income
|
$
|
14,301
|
$
|
10,916
|
$
|
3,385
|
31.0%
|
|
10.2%
|
|
8.4%
|
|
Operating
income for each operating segment is computed based on net sales, less cost
of
goods sold and any selling, general, and administrative expenses ("SG&A")
associated with the segment. The SG&A used to compute each segment's
operating income are comprised of SG&A directly associated with the segment,
plus overhead expenses that are allocable to the operating segment.
During
the first quarter of fiscal 2007, we completed the transition of our Housewares
segment’s operations to our internal operating systems and our new distribution
facility in Southaven, Mississippi. In the last quarter of fiscal 2007, we
completed the consolidation of our domestic appliance inventories into the
same
new facility.
Throughout
fiscal 2007, we conducted an evaluation of our shared cost allocation
methodology given the structural and process changes that were taking place
in
our operations, and changed our methodology in the first quarter of fiscal
2008.
We believe the new method better reflects the economics of our newly
consolidated operations. The table below summarizes the expense allocations
made
to the Housewares segment for the three months ended May 31, 2007 compared
to
the same period in the previous year. Some of these expenses were previously
absorbed by the personal care segment.
Housewares
Segment Expense Allocation
(in thousands) | |||||||
Three
Months Ended May 31,
|
|||||||
2007
|
2006
|
||||||
Distribution
and sourcing expense
|
$
|
2,854
|
$
|
1,427
|
|||
Other
operating and corporate overhead expense
|
1,326
|
998
|
|||||
Total
allocated expenses
|
$
|
4,180
|
$
|
2,425
|
|||
|
|||||||
Expense
allocation as a percentage of net sales:
|
|||||||
Distribution
and sourcing expense
|
8.6%
|
|
5.7%
|
|
|||
Other
operating and corporate overhead expense
|
4.0%
|
|
4.0%
|
|
|||
Total
allocated expenses
|
12.5%
|
|
9.7%
|
|
-32-
Interest
expense and other income / expense
Interest
expense for the three month period ended May 31, 2007 decreased to $4,113
compared to $4,506 for the same period in the prior year. The decrease in
interest expense was principally the result of:
· |
Lower
amounts of debt outstanding in the first quarter of fiscal 2008;
and
|
· |
In
the first quarter of fiscal 2007, we expensed $279 of interest in
connection with a Hong Kong tax settlement.
|
As
discussed elsewhere in this report, at the end of the third quarter of fiscal
2007, we entered into interest rate swap agreements to effectively fix interest
rates on most of our floating rate debt.
Other
income, net for the three month period ended May 31, 2007 was $1,254 compared
to
$790 for the same period in the prior year. The following table sets forth,
for
the periods indicated, the key components of other income and expense, as a
percentage of net sales, and as a year-over-year percentage change:
OTHER
INCOME (EXPENSE)
(dollars
in thousands)
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Quarter
Ended May 31,
|
%
of Net Sales
|
||||||||||||||||||
2007
|
2006
|
$
Change
|
%
Change
|
2007
|
2006
|
||||||||||||||
Interest
income
|
$
|
1,082
|
$
|
289
|
$
|
793
|
*
|
0.8%
|
|
0.2%
|
|
||||||||
Unrealized
gains (losses on) securities
|
(55
|
)
|
60
|
(115
|
)
|
*
|
0.0%
|
|
0.0%
|
|
|||||||||
Miscellaneous
other income
|
227
|
441
|
(214
|
)
|
-48.4%
|
|
0.2%
|
|
0.3%
|
|
|||||||||
Total
other income (expense)
|
$
|
1,254
|
$
|
790
|
$
|
464
|
58.7%
|
|
0.9%
|
|
0.6%
|
|
*
Calculation is not meaningful
Interest
income was higher for the three months ended May 31, 2007, when compared to
the
same period last year due to combined effects of higher levels of temporarily
invested cash and higher interest rates earned.
Miscellaneous
other income for the three month period ended May 31, 2006, included a $422
gain
from the sale of 3.9 acres of raw land adjacent to our El Paso, Texas office
and
distribution center.
Income
tax expense
Income
tax expense for the three month period ended May 31, 2007 was 11.6 percent
of
earnings before income taxes versus 7.2 percent of earnings before income taxes
for the same period in the prior year. The difference in rates was due to the
impact for the quarter ended May 31, 2006, of the reversal of a $192 of tax
provision previously established in connection with a Hong Kong tax settlement.
This had the effect of lowering that quarter’s tax expense by approximately 2.7
percent. Also, in the fiscal quarter ended May 31, 2007 we had more income
in
higher tax rate jurisdictions.
-33-
FINANCIAL
CONDITION, LIQUIDITY, AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Selected
measures of our liquidity and capital resources as of May 31, 2007 and May
31,
2006 are shown below:
SELECTED MEASURES OF OUR LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES | |||||||
Three
Months Ended May 31,
|
|||||||
2007
|
2006
|
||||||
Accounts
Receivable Turnover (Days) (1)
|
71.0
|
75.1
|
|||||
Inventory
Turnover (Times) (1)
|
2.3
|
1.8
|
|||||
Working
Capital (in
thousands)
|
$
|
226,310
|
$
|
198,131
|
|||
Current
Ratio
|
2.8
: 1
|
2.6
: 1
|
|||||
Ending
Debt to Ending Equity Ratio (2)
|
47.3
|
%
|
56.6
|
%
|
|||
Return
on Average Equity (1)
|
10.5
|
%
|
9.9
|
%
|
(1) |
Accounts
receivable turnover, inventory turnover, and return on average equity
computations use 12-month trailing sales, cost of sales, or net income
components as required by the particular measure. The current and
four
prior quarters' ending balances of accounts receivable, inventory,
and
equity are used for the purposes of computing the average balance
component as required by the particular
measure.
|
(2) |
Total
debt is defined as all debt outstanding at the balance sheet date.
This
includes the sum of the following lines when they appear on our
consolidated condensed balance sheets: "Revolving line of credit",
"Current portion of long-term debt", and "Long-term debt, less current
portion."
|
Operating
Activities
Our
combined balance of cash and temporary investments was $59,419 at May 31, 2007,
compared to $91,205 at February 28, 2007. Operating activities provided $4,910
of cash during the first three months of fiscal 2008, compared to $943 of cash
provided during the same period in fiscal 2006. The increase in operating cash
flow was primarily due to the improved inventory and receivables management
in
our core business.
Accounts
receivable decreased $4,396 to $111,500 as of May 31, 2007, compared to $115,896
at the end of fiscal 2007. Accounts receivable turnover improved to 71.0 days
at
May 31, 2007 from 75.1 days at May 31, 2006. This calculation is based on a
rolling five quarter accounts receivable balance. Accounts receivable turnover
continued to improve due to our continued emphasis on aggressive management
of
collections and sales allowances, and operating efficiencies we have gained
as a
result of our Global Enterprise Resource Planning system.
Inventories
increased $12,144 to $156,214 as of May 31, 2007, compared to $144,070 at the
end of fiscal 2007. We acquired $8,426 of inventory in the acquisition of
Belson, as discussed elsewhere in this report. Despite the Belson acquisition,
inventory turnover improved to 2.3 at May 31, 2007 compared to 1.8 at May 31,
2006 due primarily to improved inventory management and higher inventories
in
the prior year quarter resulting from our warehouse transition.
Working
capital increased to $226,310 at May 31, 2007, compared to $198,131 at May
31,
2006. Our current ratio increased to 2.8:1 at May 31, 2007 compared to 2.6:1
at
May 31, 2006. The
improvements in our working capital position over the past year is the result
of
the strength of our cash flow, improved receivables and inventory management,
which allowed us over the latest twelve months to use $43,205 of cash for
business and trademark acquisitions, pay down $22,634 of debt, and increase
our
cash and temporary investments by $33,347.
-34-
Investing
Activities
Investing
activities used $12,111 of cash during the three months ended May 31, 2007.
Listed below are some significant highlights of our investing
activities:
· |
We
spent $605 on molds and tooling, $271 on information technology
infrastructure, and $136 for recurring additions and/or replacements
of
fixed assets in the normal and ordinary course of
business.
|
· |
We
spent $36,500 in cash to acquire accounts receivable, inventory,
trademarks, goodwill and intangible assets of the Belson
business.
|
· |
We
spent $99 on patent cost registrations for our Housewares
segment.
|
· |
We
liquidated $25,500 of temporary cash investments, primarily for use
in the
acquisition of Belson.
|
Financing
Activities
Financing
activities provided $915 of cash during the three months ended May 31, 2007.
Highlights of those activities follow.
· |
Employees
exercised 42,050 options for common shares providing $767 of cash
and $97
in related tax benefits.
|
· |
We
recorded $51 of deferred tax benefits associated with the share-based
compensation expense as cash flow from financing activities under
the line
entitled “Share-based compensation tax benefit” in our consolidated
condensed statement of cash flow.
|
Our
ability to access our Revolving Line of Credit facility is subject to our
compliance with the terms and conditions of the credit facility and long-term
debt agreements, including financial covenants. The financial covenants require
us to maintain certain Debt/EBITDA ratios, fixed charge coverage ratios,
consolidated net worth levels, and other financial requirements. Certain
covenants as of May 31, 2007, limit our total outstanding indebtedness from
all
sources to no more than 3.5 times the latest twelve months trailing EBITDA.
These covenants effectively limited our ability to incur no more than $66,923
of
additional debt from all sources, including draws on our Revolving Line of
Credit Agreement. Additionally, our debt agreements restrict us from incurring
liens on any of our properties, except under certain conditions. In the event
we
were to default on any of our other debt, it would constitute a default under
our credit facilities as well. As of May 31, 2007, we are in compliance with
the
terms of the various credit agreements.
-35-
Contractual
Obligations:
Our
contractual obligations and commercial commitments, as of May 31, 2007 were:
PAYMENTS
DUE BY PERIOD - TWELVE MONTHS ENDED MAY 31:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
(in
thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
2008
|
2009
|
2010
|
2011
|
2012
|
After
|
|||||||||||||||||
Total
|
1
year
|
2
years
|
3
years
|
4
years
|
5
years
|
5
years
|
||||||||||||||||
Term
debt - fixed rate
|
$
|
25,000
|
$
|
10,000
|
$
|
3,000
|
$
|
3,000
|
$
|
3,000
|
$
|
3,000
|
$
|
3,000
|
||||||||
Term
debt - floating rate (1) (2)
|
225,000
|
-
|
-
|
100,000
|
-
|
50,000
|
75,000
|
|||||||||||||||
Long-term
incentive plan payouts
|
2,614
|
1,611
|
843
|
160
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||||||||
Interest
on floating rate debt (1)
|
56,226
|
13,343
|
13,343
|
7,943
|
7,453
|
4,753
|
9,391
|
|||||||||||||||
Interest
on fixed rate debt
|
3,861
|
1,553
|
896
|
679
|
462
|
244
|
27
|
|||||||||||||||
Open
purchase orders
|
80,096
|
80,096
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||||||||
Minimum
royalty payments
|
69,713
|
2,636
|
6,840
|
8,393
|
8,110
|
7,800
|
35,934
|
|||||||||||||||
Advertising
and promotional
|
72,921
|
9,237
|
5,797
|
7,542
|
7,199
|
7,366
|
35,780
|
|||||||||||||||
Operating
leases
|
11,692
|
1,915
|
1,170
|
1,236
|
928
|
943
|
5,500
|
|||||||||||||||
Open
letters of credit pending settlement
|
1,063
|
1,063
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||||||||
Other
|
250
|
250
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||||||||
Total
contractual obligations
|
$
|
548,436
|
$
|
121,704
|
$
|
31,889
|
$
|
128,953
|
$
|
27,152
|
$
|
74,106
|
$
|
164,632
|
(1) |
The
future obligation for interest on our variable rate debt has historically
been estimated assuming the rates in effect as of the end of the
latest
fiscal quarter on which we are reporting. As mentioned above in Note
13,
on September 28, 2006, the Company entered into interest rate hedge
agreements in conjunction with its outstanding unsecured floating
interest
rate $100,000, 5 year; $50,000, 7 year; and $75,000, 10 year Senior
Notes
(the “swaps”). The swaps are a hedge of the variable LIBOR rates used to
reset the floating rates on the Senior Notes. The swaps effectively
fix
the interest rates on the 5, 7 and 10 year Senior Notes at 5.89,
5.89 and
6.01 percent, respectively, beginning September 29, 2006. Accordingly,
the
future interest obligations related to this debt has been estimated
using
these rates. On
June 8, 2007, we amended our interest rate swap agreement, concurrent
with
a notice to prepay $25,000 of our $100,000 5 year floating rate Senior
notes, reducing the notional amount of the swap contracts from $100,000
to
$75,000, and recording a gain of $163 upon the liquidation of our
position
in $25,000 of swaps. The gain will be recorded as a component of
“Interest
expense” for the fiscal quarter ending August 31, 2007. The remaining
interest rate swaps are considered highly effective and will continue
to
be accounted for as cash flow
hedges.
|
(2) |
On
June 8, 2007, we gave notice to prepay $25,000 of our $100,000, 5
year
floating rate Senior Notes without penalty. This prepayment was made
on
June 29, 2007. The amount prepaid will reduce the amount due in June
2009
from $100,000 to $75,000.
|
Off-Balance
Sheet Arrangements:
We
have
no existing activities involving special purpose entities or off-balance sheet
financing.
Current
and Future Capital Needs:
As
of May
31, 2007, we have no outstanding
borrowings and $1,260 of open letters of credit against our Revolving Line
of
Credit Facility, nor have we needed to draw on this facility thus far during
the
current fiscal year. As mentioned in Note 18 in the accompanying consolidated
condensed financial statements, On June 8, 2007, we gave notice to prepay
$25,000 of our $100,000, 5 year floating rate Senior Notes without penalty.
This
prepayment was made June 29, 2007. Also, on June 7, 2007, based upon a review
of
our expected cash flows, we gave notice to permanently reduce our five year
$75,000 Revolving Line of Credit Agreement commitment by $25,000 to $50,000.
The
reduction of the commitment will result in a proportionate decline in the future
cost of associated commitment fees under the facility.
-36-
Based
on
our current financial condition and current operations, we believe that cash
flows from operations and available financing sources will continue to provide
sufficient capital resources to fund the Company's foreseeable short and
long-term liquidity requirements. We expect our capital needs to stem primarily
from the need to purchase sufficient levels of inventory, to carry normal levels
of accounts receivable on our balance sheet, to fund normal levels of capital
expenditure, to continue to enhance our North American distribution and
logistics capabilities, and to continue to expand the scope of our operations
in
selected European, Asian and Latin American markets. Over the longer term,
we
expect we will have sufficient capability to repay maturities of our fixed
and
floating rate debt through a combination of cash generated from operations,
the
issuance of additional common shares, and the proceeds of associated new
financings.
The
Company may elect to repurchase additional shares of its common stock from
time
to time based upon its assessment of its liquidity position and market
conditions at the time, and subject to limitations contained in its debt
agreements.
We
continue to evaluate acquisition opportunities on a regular basis and may
augment our internal growth with acquisitions of complementary businesses or
product lines. We may finance acquisition activity with available cash, the
issuance of common shares, or with additional debt, depending upon the size
and
nature of any such transaction and the status of the capital markets at the
time
of such acquisition.
CRITICAL
ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The
SEC
defines critical accounting policies as "those that are both most important
to
the portrayal of a company's financial condition and results, and require
management's most difficult, subjective or complex judgments, often as a result
of the need to make estimates about the effect of matters that are inherently
uncertain."
Other
than the Company’s adoption of FIN 48, as described below and in the Note 12 to
the consolidated condensed financial statements, there have been no material
changes to the Company’s critical accounting policies from the information
provided in Part II, Item 7. “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations”, under the heading “Critical Accounting
Policies” in our latest Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended February
28, 2007.
Income
Taxes
-
Effective March 1, 2007, we adopted FIN 48. See “Note 12: Taxes” in the Notes to
Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements of this Form 10-Q for further
discussion.
We
must
make certain estimates and judgments in determining income tax expense for
financial statement purposes. These estimates and judgments must be used in
the
calculation of certain tax assets and liabilities because of differences in
the
timing of recognition of revenue and expense for tax and financial statement
purposes. We must assess the likelihood that we will be able to recover our
deferred tax assets. If recovery is not likely, we must increase our provision
for taxes by recording a valuation allowance against the deferred tax assets
that we estimate will not ultimately be recoverable. As changes occur in our
assessments regarding our ability to recover our deferred tax assets, our tax
provision is increased in any period in which we determine that the recovery
is
not probable.
In
addition, the calculation of our tax liabilities requires us to account for
uncertainties in the application of complex tax regulations. As a result of
the
implementation of FIN 48, we recognize liabilities for uncertain tax positions
based on the two-step process prescribed within the interpretation. The first
step is to evaluate the tax position for recognition by determining if the
weight of available evidence indicates that it is more likely than not that
the
position will be sustained on audit based upon its technical merits, including
resolution of related appeals or litigation processes, if any. The second step
requires us to estimate and measure the tax benefit as the largest amount
that has greater than a 50% likelihood of being realized upon ultimate
settlement. It is inherently difficult and subjective to estimate such amounts,
as this requires us to determine the probability of various possible outcomes.
We reevaluate these uncertain tax positions on a quarterly basis. This
evaluation is based on factors including, but not limited to, changes in facts
or circumstances, changes in tax law, effectively settled issues under audit,
historical experience with similar tax matters, guidance from our tax advisors,
and new audit activity. A change in recognition or measurement would result
in
the recognition of a tax benefit or an additional charge to the tax provision
in
the period in which the change occurs.
-37-
For
a
more comprehensive list of our accounting policies, we encourage you to read
Note 1 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, accompanying the
consolidated financial statements included in our latest annual report on Form
10-K for the year ended February 28, 2007. Note 1 in the consolidated financial
statements included with Form 10-K contains several other policies, including
policies governing the timing of revenue recognition, that are important to
the
preparation of our consolidated financial statements, but do not meet the SEC's
definition of critical accounting policies because they do not involve
subjective or complex judgments.
NEW
ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
See
Note
2 - New Accounting Pronouncements, in the accompanying consolidated condensed
financial statements, for a discussion of the status and potential impact of
new
accounting pronouncements.
-38-
ITEM
3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET
RISK
Changes
in interest rates and currency exchange rates are our primary financial market
risks. Fluctuation in interest rates causes variation in the amount of interest
that we can earn on our available cash and the amount of interest expense we
incur on our short-term and long-term borrowings. Interest on our long-term
debt
outstanding as of May 31, 2007 is both floating and fixed. Fixed rates are
in
place on $25,000 of senior notes at rates ranging from 7.01 percent to 7.24
percent.
Floating
rates are in place on $225,000 of debt. Interest rates on these notes are reset
as described in Note 13 to our consolidated condensed financial statements.
Interest rates during the latest fiscal quarter on these notes ranged from
6.20
to 6.26 percent. During
the third quarter of fiscal 2007, the Company decided to actively manage most
of
its floating rate debt using interest rate swaps. The Company entered into
three
interest rate swaps that convert an aggregate notional principal of $225,000
from floating interest rate payments under its 5, 7 and 10 year Senior Notes
to
fixed interest rate payments ranging from 5.89 to 6.01 percent. In these
transactions, we executed three contracts to pay fixed rates of interest on
an
aggregate notional principal amount of $225,000 at rates currently ranging
from
5.04 to 5.11 percent while simultaneously receiving floating rate interest
payments currently set at 5.35 percent as of May 31, 2007 on the same notional
amount. The fixed rate side of the swap will not change over the life of the
swap. The floating rate payments are reset quarterly based on three month LIBOR.
The resets are concurrent with the interest payments made on the underlying
debt. These swaps are used to reduce the Company’s risk of the possibility of
increased interest costs; however, should interest rates drop significantly,
we
could also lose the benefit that floating rate debt can provide in a declining
interest rate environment.
These
levels of debt, the future impact of any draws against our Revolving Line of
Credit Agreement, whose interest rates can vary with the term of each draw,
and
the uncertainty regarding the level of future interest rates, increases our
risk
profile.
Because
we purchase a majority of our inventory using U.S. Dollars, we are subject
to
minimal short-term foreign exchange rate risk in purchasing inventory. However,
long-term declines in the value of the U.S. Dollar could subject us to higher
inventory costs. Such an increase in inventory costs could occur if foreign
vendors were to react to such a decline by raising prices. Sales in the United
States are transacted in U.S. Dollars. The majority of our sales in the United
Kingdom are transacted in British Pounds, in France and Germany is transacted
in
Euros, in Mexico is transacted in Pesos, in Brazil is transacted in Reals,
and
in Canada is transacted in Canadian Dollars. When the U.S. Dollar strengthens
against other currencies in which we transact sales, we are exposed to foreign
exchange losses on those sales because our foreign currency sales prices are
not
adjusted for currency fluctuations. When the U.S. Dollar weakens against those
currencies, we realize foreign currency gains.
During
the three month periods ended May 31, 2007 and 2006, we transacted approximately
15 percent, of our net sales in foreign currencies. For the three month periods
ended May 31, 2007 and 2006, we incurred net foreign exchange gains of $651
and
$316, respectively.
We
hedge
against foreign currency exchange rate risk by entering into a series of forward
contracts designated as cash flow hedges to protect against the foreign currency
exchange risk inherent in our forecasted transactions denominated in certain
currencies other than the U.S. Dollar. In these transactions, we execute a
forward currency contract that will settle at the end of a forecasted period.
Because the size and terms of the forward contract are designed so that its
fair
market value will move in the opposite direction and approximate magnitude
of
the underlying foreign currency’s forecasted exchange gain or loss during the
forecasted period, a hedging relationship is created. To the extent we forecast
the expected foreign currency cash flows from the period the forward contract
is
entered into until the date it will settle with reasonable accuracy, we
significantly lower or materially eliminate a particular currency’s exchange
risk exposure over the life of the related forward contract.
-39-
For
transactions designated as cash flow hedges, the effective portion of the change
in the fair value (arising from the change in the spot rates from period to
period) is deferred in Other Comprehensive Income. These amounts are
subsequently recognized in "Selling, general, and administrative expense" in
our
consolidated statements of income in the same period as the forecasted
transactions close out over the remaining balance of their terms. The
ineffective portion of the change in fair value (arising from the change in
the
difference between the spot rate and the forward rate) is recognized in the
period it occurred. These amounts are also recognized in "Selling, general,
and
administrative expense" in our consolidated statements of income. Our cash
flow
hedges, while executed in order to minimize our foreign currency exchange rate
risk, do subject us to fair value fluctuations on the underlying contracts.
We
do not enter into any forward exchange contracts or similar instruments for
trading or other speculative purposes.
The
following table summarizes the various foreign currency contracts and interest
rate swap contracts we designated as cash flow hedges that were open at May
31,
2007 and February 28, 2007:
CASH
FLOW HEDGES
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
May
31, 2007
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Contract
|
Currency
to
|
Notional
|
Contract
|
Range of Maturities
|
Spot
Rate at Contract
|
Spot
Rate at May 31,
|
Weighted
Average Forward Rate
|
Weighted
Average Forward Rate at May 31,
|
Market
Value of the Contract in U.S. Dollars
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Type
|
Deliver
|
Amount
|
Date
|
From
|
To
|
Date
|
2007
|
at
Inception
|
2007
|
(Thousands)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Foreign
Currency Contracts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
Sell
|
|
Pounds
|
|
|
£10,000,000
|
|
|
5/12/2006
|
|
|
12/14/2007
|
|
|
2/14/2008
|
|
|
1.8940
|
|
|
1.9796
|
|
|
1.9010
|
|
|
1.9709
|
|
|
($699
|
)
|
|
Sell
|
|
Pounds
|
|
|
£5,000,000
|
|
|
11/28/2006
|
|
|
12/11/2008
|
|
|
1/15/2009
|
|
|
1.9385
|
|
|
1.9796
|
|
|
1.9242
|
|
|
1.9550
|
|
|
($154
|
)
|
|
Sell
|
|
Pounds
|
|
|
£5,000,000
|
|
|
4/17/2007
|
|
|
2/17/2009
|
|
|
8/17/2009
|
|
|
2.0000
|
|
|
1.9796
|
|
|
1.9644
|
|
|
1.9517
|
|
|
$64
|
|
|
Subtotal
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($789
|
)
|
Interest
Rate Swap Contracts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Swap
|
|
Dollars
|
|
|
$100,000,000
|
|
|
9/28/2006
|
|
6/29/2009
|
(Pay
fixed rate at 5.04%, receive floating rate at 5.35%)
|
|
$359
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Swap
|
|
Dollars
|
|
|
$50,000,000
|
|
|
9/28/2006
|
|
6/29/2011
|
(Pay
fixed rate at 5.04%, receive floating rate at 5.35%)
|
|
$330
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Swap
|
|
Dollars
|
|
|
$75,000,000
|
|
|
9/28/2006
|
|
6/29/2014
|
(Pay
fixed rate at 5.11%, receive floating rate at 5.35%)
|
|
$750
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Subtotal
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$1,439
|
|
|
Fair
Value of Cash Flow Hedges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$650
|
|
February
28, 2007
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Contract
|
Currency
to
|
Notional
|
Contract
|
Range of Maturities
|
Spot
Rate at Contract
|
Spot
Rate at Feb. 28,
|
Weighted
Average Forward Rate at
|
Weighted
Average Forward Rate at
|
Market
Value of the Contract in U.S. Dollars
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Type
|
Deliver
|
Amount
|
Date
|
From
|
To
|
Date
|
2007
|
Inception
|
Feb
28, 2007
|
(Thousands)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Foreign
Currency Contracts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
Sell
|
|
Pounds
|
|
|
£10,000,000
|
|
|
5/12/2006
|
|
|
12/14/2007
|
|
|
2/14/2008
|
|
|
1.8940
|
|
|
1.9636
|
|
|
1.9010
|
|
|
1.9543
|
|
|
($533
|
)
|
|
Sell
|
|
Pounds
|
|
|
£5,000,000
|
|
|
11/28/2006
|
|
|
12/11/2008
|
|
|
1/15/2009
|
|
|
1.9385
|
|
|
1.9636
|
|
|
1.9242
|
|
|
1.9408
|
|
|
($83
|
)
|
|
Subtotal
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($616
|
)
|
Interest
Rate Swap Contracts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Swap
|
|
Dollars
|
|
|
$100,000,000
|
|
|
9/28/2006
|
|
6/29/2009
|
(Pay
fixed rate at 5.04%, receive floating rate at 5.36%)
|
|
($326
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||||
Swap
|
|
Dollars
|
|
|
$50,000,000
|
|
|
9/28/2006
|
|
6/29/2011
|
(Pay
fixed rate at 5.04%, receive floating rate at 5.36%)
|
|
($342
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||||
Swap
|
|
Dollars
|
|
|
$75,000,000
|
|
|
9/28/2006
|
|
6/29/2014
|
(Pay
fixed rate at 5.11%, receive floating rate at 5.36%)
|
|
($833
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||||
Subtotal
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($1,501
|
)
|
Fair
Value of Cash Flow Hedges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($2,117
|
)
|
We
expect
that as currency market conditions warrant, and our foreign denominated
transaction exposure grows, we will continue to execute additional contracts
in
order to hedge against certain potential foreign exchange losses. The Company
is
exposed to credit risk in the event of non-performance by the other party (a
large financial institution) to its current existing forward and swap contracts.
However, the Company does not anticipate non-performance by the other
party.
-40-
INFORMATION
REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
Certain
written and oral statements made by our Company and subsidiaries of our Company
may constitute "forward-looking statements" as defined under the Private
Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. This includes statements made in
this
report, in other filings with the SEC, in press releases, and in certain other
oral and written presentations. Generally, the words "anticipates", "believes",
"expects", "plans", "may", "will", "should", "seeks", "estimates", “project”,
"predict", "potential", "continue", "intends", and other similar words identify
forward-looking statements. All statements that address operating results,
events or developments that we expect or anticipate will occur in the future,
including statements related to sales, earnings per share results, and
statements expressing general expectations about future operating results,
are
forward-looking statements and are based upon the Company’s current expectations
and various assumptions. The Company believes there is a reasonable basis for
its expectations and assumptions, but there can be no assurance that the Company
will realize its expectations or that the Company's assumptions will prove
correct. Forward-looking statements are subject to risks that could cause them
to differ materially from actual results. Accordingly, the Company cautions
readers not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements. We believe
that these risks include but are not limited to the risks described in Part
1,
“Item 1A. Risk Factors” of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
February 28, 2007 and risks otherwise described from time to time in our SEC
reports as filed. The Company undertakes no obligation to publicly update or
revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information,
future events, or otherwise.
-41-
ITEM
4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
EVALUATION
OF DISCLOSURE CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Our
management, under the supervision and with the participation of our Chief
Executive Officer (CEO) and Chief Financial Officer (CFO), has evaluated the
effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as defined in Rule
13a-15(e) promulgated under the Exchange Act as of the end of the period covered
by this report. Management has concluded that our disclosure controls and
procedures are effective to ensure that information we are required to disclose
in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is accumulated and
communicated to management, including the CEO and CFO, as appropriate to allow
timely decisions regarding required disclosure and is recorded, processed,
summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules
and forms.
Our
management, including the CEO and CFO, does not expect that our disclosure
controls or our internal control over financial reporting will prevent all
error
and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well designed and operated,
can
provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the control system’s
objectives will be met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect
the
fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must
be
considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in
all
control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that
all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the company have
been
detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in
decision-making can be faulty and that breakdowns can occur because of simple
error or mistake. Controls can also be circumvented by the individual acts
of
some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management override
of
the controls. The design of any system of controls is based in part on certain
assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance
that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential
future conditions. Over time, controls may become inadequate because of changes
in conditions or deterioration in the degree of compliance with policies or
procedures. Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control
system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected.
In
the
process of our evaluation, among other matters, we considered the existence
of
any “significant deficiencies” or “material weaknesses” in our internal control
over financial reporting, and whether we had identified any acts of fraud
involving personnel with a significant role in our internal control over
financial reporting. In the professional auditing literature, “significant
deficiencies” are referred to as “reportable conditions,” which are deficiencies
in the design or operation of controls that could adversely affect our ability
to record, process, summarize and report financial data in the financial
statements. Auditing literature defines “material weakness” as a particularly
serious reportable condition in which the internal control does not reduce
to a
relatively low level the risk that misstatements caused by error or fraud may
occur in amounts that would be material in relation to the financial statements
and the risk that such misstatements would not be detected within a timely
period by employees in the normal course of performing their assigned functions.
CHANGES
IN INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
In
connection with the evaluation described above, we identified no change in
our
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during our fiscal
quarter ended May 31, 2007, that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial
reporting.
-42-
PART
II. OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM
1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
Securities
Class Action Litigation - Class
action lawsuits have been filed and consolidated into one action against the
Company, Gerald J. Rubin, the Company’s Chairman of the Board, President and
Chief Executive Officer, and Thomas J. Benson, the Company’s Chief Financial
Officer, on behalf of purchasers of publicly traded securities of the Company.
The Company understands that the plaintiffs allege violations of Sections 10(b)
and 20(a) of the Exchange Act, and Rule 10b-5 thereunder, on the grounds that
the Company and the two officers engaged in a scheme to defraud the Company’s
shareholders through the issuance of positive earnings guidance intended to
artificially inflate the Company’s share price so that Mr. Rubin could sell
almost 400,000 of the Company’s common shares at an inflated price. The
plaintiffs are seeking unspecified damages, interest, fees, costs, an accounting
of any alleged insider trading proceeds, and injunctive relief, including an
accounting of and the imposition of a constructive trust and/or asset freeze
on
the defendants’ alleged insider trading proceeds. The class period stated in the
complaint was October 12, 2004 through October 10, 2005.
The
lawsuit was brought in the United States District Court for the Western District
of Texas. The Company intends to defend the foregoing lawsuit vigorously, but,
because the lawsuit is still in the preliminary stages, the Company cannot
predict the outcome and is not currently able to evaluate the likelihood of
success or the range of potential loss, if any, that might be incurred in
connection with the action. However, if the Company were to lose on any issues
connected with the lawsuit or if the lawsuit is not settled on favorable terms,
the judgement or settlement may have a material adverse effect on the Company's
consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows. There
is
a risk that such litigation could result in substantial costs and divert
management’s attention and resources from its business, which could adversely
affect the Company's business. The Company carries insurance that provides
an
aggregate coverage of $20 million after a self-insured retention of $500
thousand for the period during which the claims were filed, but cannot evaluate
at this time whether such coverage will be adequate to cover losses, if any,
arising out of the lawsuit.
On
May
15, 2006, the Company filed a motion to dismiss the aforementioned lawsuit
citing numerous deficiencies with the claims asserted in the lawsuit. On May
24,
2007, the motion to dismiss was denied. The discovery phase of the litigation
is
now underway.
Hong
Kong Income Taxes
- On May
10, 2006, the IRD and the Company reached a settlement regarding tax liabilities
for the fiscal years 1995 through 1997. This agreement was subsequently approved
by the IRD’s Board of Review. For those tax years, we agreed to an assessment of
approximately $4,019 including estimated penalties and interest. Our
consolidated financial statements at May 31, 2006 and February 28, 2006 included
adequate provisions for this liability. As a result of this tax settlement,
in
the first quarter of fiscal 2007, we reversed $192 of tax provision previously
established and recorded $279 of associated interest. During the second quarter
of fiscal 2007, the liability was paid with $3,282 of tax reserve certificates
and the balance in cash.
For
the
fiscal years 1998 through 2003, the IRD has assessed a total of $25,461 (U.S.)
in tax on certain profits of our foreign subsidiaries. Hong Kong is seeking
to
levy taxes on income earned from certain activities previously conducted in
Hong
Kong. Negotiations with the IRD regarding these issues and their settlement
are
ongoing, and it is unclear at this time when they will be resolved.
In
connection with the IRD's tax assessment for the fiscal years 1998 through
2003,
we have purchased tax reserve certificates in Hong Kong totaling $25,144. Tax
reserve certificates represent the prepayment by a taxpayer of potential tax
liabilities. The amounts paid for tax reserve certificates are refundable in
the
event that the value of the tax reserve certificates exceeds the related tax
liability. These certificates are denominated in Hong Kong dollars and are
subject to the risks associated with foreign currency fluctuations.
-43-
If
the
IRD were to successfully assert the same position for fiscal years after fiscal
year 2003, the resulting assessment could total $18,673 (U.S.) in taxes for
fiscal years 2004 and 2005. Although the final resolution of the proposed
adjustments is uncertain and involves unsettled areas of the law, based on
currently available information, we have provided for our best estimate of
the
total probable tax liability for this matter. While the resolution of the issue
may result in tax liabilities that are significantly higher or lower than the
reserves established for this matter, management currently believes that the
resolution will not have a material effect on our consolidated financial
position or liquidity. However, an unfavorable resolution could have a material
effect on our consolidated results of operations or cash flows in the quarter
in
which an adjustment is recorded or the tax is due or paid.
Effective
March 2005, we had concluded the conduct of all operating activities in Hong
Kong that we believe were the basis of the IRD’s assessments. Over the course of
the prior year, the Company had moved these activities to China and Macao.
The
Company established a Macao offshore company (“MOC”) and began operating from
Macao in the third quarter of fiscal 2005. As a MOC, we have been granted an
indefinite tax holiday and currently pay no taxes.
United
States Income Taxes -
The IRS
is auditing our U.S. consolidated federal tax returns for fiscal years 2003
and
2004 and has provided notice of proposed adjustments of $5,953 to taxes for
the
years under audit. The Company is vigorously contesting these adjustments.
Although the ultimate outcome of the dispute with the IRS cannot be predicted
with certainty, management is of the opinion that adequate provisions for taxes
in those years have been made in our consolidated financial statements.
The
IRS
recently began an examination of the U.S. consolidated federal tax return for
fiscal year 2005. The audit is in the preliminary stages and, to date, no
adjustments have been proposed.
Other
Matters -
We
are
involved in various other legal claims and proceedings in the normal course
of
operations. We believe the outcome of these matters will not have a material
adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations,
or
liquidity.
ITEM
1A. RISK FACTORS
The
ownership of our common shares involves a number of risks and uncertainties.
In
evaluating the Company and our business before making an investment decision
regarding our securities, potential investors should carefully consider the
risk
factors and uncertainties described in Part 1, "Item 1A. Risk Factors" of our
latest Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended February 28, 2007. Since
the publication or our Annual report on Form 10-K, there have been no material
changes in our risk factors from those disclosed therein.
ITEM
2. UNREGISTERED
SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
During
the quarter ended August 31, 2003, our Board of Directors authorized us to
purchase, in the open market or through private transactions, up to 3,000,000
shares of our common stock over a period extending to May 31, 2006. On April
25,
2006, our Board of Directors approved a resolution to extend the existing plan
to May 31, 2009. During the three month periods ended May 31, 2007 and 2006,
respectively, we did not repurchase any common shares. From September 1, 2003
through May 31, 2007, we have repurchased 1,563,836 shares at a total cost
of
$45,611,690 or an average share price of $29.17. An additional 1,436,164 shares
are authorized for purchase under this plan.
-44-
ITEM
6. EXHIBITS
(a) |
Exhibits
|
31.1 |
Certification
of the Chief Executive Officer required by Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule
15d-14(a) pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002.
|
31.2 |
Certification
of the Chief Financial Officer required by Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule
15d-14(a) pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002.
|
32 |
Joint
certification of the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial
Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002.
|
-45-
SIGNATURES
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant
has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto
duly authorized.
HELEN
OF TROY LIMITED
(Registrant)
|
||
|
|
|
Date: July
10, 2007
|
/s/
Gerald J. Rubin
|
|
Gerald
J. Rubin
|
||
Chairman
of the Board, Chief Executive Officer, President, Director
and
Principal Executive Officer
|
Date: July
10, 2007
|
/s/
Thomas J. Benson
|
|
Thomas
J. Benson
|
||
Senior
Vice-President
and
Chief Financial Officer
|
Date: July
10, 2007
|
/s/
Richard J. Oppenheim
|
|
Richard
J. Oppenheim
|
||
Financial
Controller
and
Principal Accounting
Officer
|
-46-
Index
to Exhibits
31.1* |
Certification
of the Chief Executive Officer required by Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule
15d-14(a) pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002.
|
31.2* |
Certification
of the Chief Financial Officer required by Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule
15d-14(a) pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002.
|
32**
|
Joint
Certification of the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial
Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002.
|
* | Filed herewith. | |
** | Furnished herewith. |
-47-