HENNESSY ADVISORS INC - Quarter Report: 2012 June (Form 10-Q)

HENNESSY ADVISORS INC - Quarter Report: 2012 June (Form 10-Q)

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Form 10-Q

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

x	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the Quarterly Period Ended June 30, 2012

¨	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the Transition Period From to

Commission File Number 000-49872

HENNESSY ADVISORS, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


California		68-0176227
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(IRS Employer Identification No.)

7250 Redwood Blvd., Suite 200 Novato, California		94945
(Address of principal executive office)		(Zip Code)

(415) 899-1555

(Issuer’s telephone number)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x

As of July 5, 2012 there were 5,759,857 shares of common stock issued and outstanding.

HENNESSY ADVISORS, INC.

INDEX


		Page Number
PART I.	Financial Information

Item 1.	Unaudited Condensed Financial Statements

	Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2012 (unaudited) and September 30, 2011		3

	Statements of Income for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 (unaudited)		4

	Statement of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity for the nine months ended June 30, 2012 (unaudited)		5

	Statements of Cash Flows for the nine months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 (unaudited)		6

	Notes to Unaudited Condensed Financial Statements		7

Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations		17

Item 4.	Controls and Procedures		31

PART II.	Other Information

Item 6.	Exhibits		31

Signatures			32

- 2 -

Hennessy Advisors, Inc.

Balance Sheets

(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)


	June 30, 2012			September 30, 2011
	(Unaudited)
Assets
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	8,587		$	8,362
Investments in marketable securities, at fair value		6			6
Investment fee income receivable		568			548
Prepaid expenses		126			236
Deferred income tax asset		157			163
Other current assets		14			19

Total current assets		9,458			9,334

Property and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation of $320 and $396, respectively		104			136
Management contracts		22,358			22,284
Investment in the Hennessy Micro Cap Growth Fund, LLC, at fair value		407			323
Other assets, net of accumulated amortization of $112 and $107, respectively		45			60

Total assets	$	32,372		$	32,137

Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
Current liabilities:
Accrued liabilities and accounts payable	$	690		$	873
Income taxes payable		20			—
Deferred rent		92			24
Bank loan		625			625

Total current liabilities		1,427			1,522

Long-term debt		1,458			1,927
Deferred income tax liability		4,354			3,848

Total liabilities		7,239			7,297

Commitments and Contingencies (Note 9)
Stockholders’ equity:
Adjustable rate preferred stock, $25 stated value, 5,000,000 shares authorized: zero shares issued and outstanding		—			—
Common stock, no par value, 15,000,000 shares authorized:
5,759,857 shares issued and outstanding at June 30, 2012 and 5,741,451 at September 30, 2011		9,579			9,567
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		(105	)		(189	)
Retained earnings		15,659			15,462

Total stockholders’ equity		25,133			24,840

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	32,372		$	32,137

See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed financial statements

- 3 -

Hennessy Advisors, Inc.

Statements of Income

(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)

(Unaudited)


	Three Months ended June 30,				Nine Months ended June 30,
	2012		2011		2012			2011
Revenue
Investment advisory fees	$	1,523	$	1,709	$	4,591		$	5,200
Shareholder service fees		192		214		570			646
Other		—		—		—			5

Total revenue		1,715		1,923		5,161			5,851

Operating expenses
Compensation and benefits		552		574		1,672			1,731
General and administrative		345		393		1,280			1,385
Mutual fund distribution		131		163		422			497
Sub-advisor fees		132		152		414			487
Amortization and depreciation		23		24		69			78

Total operating expenses		1,183		1,306		3,857			4,178

Operating income		532		617		1,304			1,673

Interest expense		12		15		39			49
Other expense (income), net		—		—		(1	)		(1	)

Income before income tax expense		520		602		1,266			1,625

Income tax expense		217		250		565			675

Net income	$	303	$	352	$	701		$	950

Earnings per share:
Basic	$	0.05	$	0.06	$	0.12		$	0.17

Diluted	$	0.05	$	0.06	$	0.12		$	0.17

Weighted average shares outstanding:
Basic		5,697,740		5,688,901		5,741,653			5,726,633

Diluted		5,706,122		5,700,878		5,750,423			5,737,943

See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed financial statements

- 4 -

Hennessy Advisors, Inc.

Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity

Nine Months Ended June 30, 2012

(In thousands, except share data)

(Unaudited)


	Common Shares			Common Stock			Retained Earnings			Other Comprehensive Loss			Total Stockholders’ Equity
Balance at September 30, 2011		5,741,451		$	9,567		$	15,462		$	(189	)	$	24,840
Net Income		—			—			701			—			701
Dividends paid		—			—			(504	)		—			(504	)
Unrealized gain on investment in Hennessy Micro Cap Growth Fund, LLC		—			—			—			84			84
Director stock options exercised		5,000			15			—			—			15
Employee and director restricted stock vested		22,103			—			—			—			—
Repurchase of vested restricted stock for employee tax withholding		(8,697	)		(24	)		—			—			(24	)
Deferred restricted stock unit compensation		—			43			—			—			43
Tax effect of RSU vesting		—			(22	)		—			—			(22	)

Balance at June 30, 2012		5,759,857		$	9,579		$	15,659		$	(105	)	$	25,133

See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed financial statements

- 5 -

Hennessy Advisors, Inc.

Statements of Cash Flows

(Unaudited)


	Nine Months Ended June 30,
	2012			2011
	(In thousands)
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income	$	701		$	950
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		69			78
Deferred income taxes		512			522
Tax effect from restricted stock unit vesting		(22	)		(54	)
Restricted stock units repurchased for employee tax withholding		(24	)		(5	)
Deferred restricted stock unit compensation		43			139
Unrealized gain on marketable securities		—			(1	)

(Increase) decrease in operating assets:
Investment fee income receivable		(20	)		5
Prepaid expenses		110			81
Other current assets		5			4
Other assets		10			(1	)
Increase (decrease) in operating liabilities:
Accrued liabilities and accounts payable		(183	)		(279	)
Income taxes		20			(18	)
Deferred rent		68			(37	)

Net cash provided by operating activities		1,289			1,384

Cash flows used in investing activities:
Purchases of property and equipment		(32	)		(42	)
Payments related to acquisition of management contracts		(74	)		—

Net cash used in investing activities		(106	)		(42	)

Cash flows provided by (used in) financing activities:
Principal payments on bank loan		(469	)		(417	)
Proceeds from exercise of director stock options		15			—
Dividend payments		(504	)		(801	)

Net cash used in financing activities		(958	)		(1,218	)

Net increase in cash and cash equivalents		225			124
Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the period		8,362			8,054

Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the period	$	8,587		$	8,178

Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:
Unrealized gain on investment	$	84		$	83

Cash paid for:
Income taxes	$	65		$	230

Interest	$	40		$	48

See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed financial statements

- 6 -

Hennessy Advisors, Inc.

Notes to Unaudited Condensed Financial Statements

(1) Basis of Financial Statement Presentation

The accompanying condensed balance sheet as of September 30, 2011, which has been derived from audited financial statements, and the unaudited interim condensed financial statements as of June 30, 2012 have been prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and include the accounts of Hennessy Advisors, Inc. (the “Company”). Certain information and footnote disclosures, normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations. In the opinion of management, the financial statements reflect all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair presentation of the financial position at June 30, 2012, the operating results for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2012 and June 30, 2011, and the cash flows for the nine months ended June 30, 2012 and June 30, 2011. These financial statements and notes should be read in conjunction with the Company’s audited financial statements and notes thereto for the year ended September 30, 2011, included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

The operating activities of the Company consist of providing investment advisory and shareholder services to nine open-end mutual funds (collectively the “Hennessy Funds”), six of which also have institutional share classes; and investment advisory services to one non-registered private pooled investment fund, the Hennessy Micro Cap Growth Fund, LLC. The Company serves as investment advisor for all classes of the Hennessy Cornerstone Growth Fund, the Hennessy Focus 30 Fund, the Hennessy Cornerstone Large Growth Fund, the Hennessy Cornerstone Value Fund, the Hennessy Select Large Value Fund, the Hennessy Select SPARX Japan Fund, the Hennessy Select SPARX Japan Smaller Companies Fund, the Hennessy Total Return Fund, the Hennessy Balanced Fund, and the Hennessy Micro Cap Growth Fund, LLC.

(2) Management Contracts

As of June 30, 2012, Hennessy Advisors had contractual management agreements with Hennessy Funds, Inc. for the Hennessy Balanced Fund and the Hennessy Total Return Fund; with Hennessy Mutual Funds, Inc. for all classes of the Hennessy Cornerstone Growth Fund, the Hennessy Cornerstone Value Fund, and the Hennessy Focus 30 Fund; with Hennessy Funds Trust for all classes of the Hennessy Cornerstone Large Growth Fund and the Hennessy Select Large Value Fund; and with Hennessy SPARX Funds Trust for all classes of the Hennessy Select SPARX Japan Fund and the Hennessy Select SPARX Japan Smaller Companies Fund.

The management agreements for the Hennessy Funds are renewed annually by (1) the board of directors or trustees of the applicable investment company or by a majority vote of the outstanding shares of the applicable fund and (2) by the vote of a majority of the directors or trustees of the applicable investment company who are not parties to the management agreement and are disinterested directors or trustees. These management agreements were renewed by the Board of Directors of Hennessy Funds, Inc. and Hennessy Mutual Funds, Inc. and by the Board of Trustees of Hennessy Funds Trust and Hennessy SPARX Funds Trust on March 7, 2012 for a period of one year.

- 7 -

Other than non-renewal, two other circumstances might lead to termination of the management agreements: (1) the assignment of a management agreement to another advisor automatically terminates the agreement (assignment includes an “indirect assignment” by transferring a controlling block of our common stock); and (2) the termination of the agreement by the Company or by one of the Hennessy Funds’ investment companies upon 60 days’ prior written notice.

Under the terms of the management agreements, each fund bears all expenses incurred in its operation that are not specifically assumed by Hennessy Advisors, the administrator or the distributor. Hennessy Advisors bears the expense of providing office space, shareholder servicing, fulfillment, clerical and bookkeeping services and maintaining books and records of the Hennessy Funds.

The Company waives its investment advisory fees to comply with contractual expense ratio limitations for the Hennessy Funds’ institutional class shares. The fee waivers are calculated daily by the funds’ accountants at US Bancorp Fund Services, LLC and are charged to expense monthly by the Company as an offset to revenue. The fees are deducted from the management fee income, and are deducted from the funds received from the funds’ accountants in the subsequent month.

In the past, fees have only been waived based on contractual obligations. However, the Company regularly analyzes the fees and has the right to waive fees at its discretion to compete with other mutual funds with lower expense ratios. Any decision to waive fees would not apply to previous periods, but would apply on a going forward basis. As of June 30, 2012, the Company has never voluntarily waived fees, and has no current intention to voluntarily waive fees.

Hennessy Advisors is also the Managing Member of the Hennessy Micro Cap Growth Fund, LLC (the “Micro Cap Fund”). Hennessy Advisors will serve as the Managing Member until its resignation or removal. The Managing Member may voluntarily resign with 30 days’ prior written notice to the other members or 60 days’ prior written notice if there is not then a remaining Managing Member. At any time, the Managing Member may designate an additional Managing Member or designate a successor Managing Member with no further consent or approval required from the other members. The Managing Member may be removed at any time, with or without cause, by the vote of the other members owning a majority-in-interest of the capital accounts of the “Disinterested Members,” defined as members other than members who are the Managing Member or affiliates of the Managing Member.

Under the terms of the management agreement for the Micro Cap Fund, the Managing Member bears all organizational expenses (defined as expenses incurred in connection with and directly related to the formation, qualification and funding of the Micro Cap Fund), but the Micro Cap Fund bears all of its operating, investment and other expenses. However, the Managing Member is responsible for the ordinary and extraordinary costs of administering the Micro Cap Fund, including any placement fees incurred in connection with the offering of interests in the Micro Cap Fund.

Hennessy Advisors, as the Managing Member of the Micro Cap Fund, has the right to reduce or waive the management fee or incentive allocation (as defined in Note 5) chargeable to any member’s account without the consent of or notice to any other member.

- 8 -

As of June 30, 2012, no triggering events or changes in circumstances occurred that indicated potential impairment of the management contracts.

(3) Investment in the Hennessy Micro Cap Growth Fund, LLC

On October 30, 2007, Hennessy Advisors invested $0.5 million in the Micro Cap Fund. The investment currently represents approximately 28.9% of the total subscriptions in the Micro Cap Fund. The Micro Cap Fund is a limited liability company for which Hennessy Advisors is the Managing Member.

The investment is classified as an available-for-sale security, is included on the balance sheet at fair market value and is accounted for using the equity method. The fair market value of the investment at June 30, 2012 was $0.4 million.

The accounting method the Company uses for its equity investments is generally dependent upon the influence the Company has over the investee. If there are investments where the Company can exert control over the financial and operating policies of the investee, which generally exists if there is a 50% or greater voting interest (the Company’s ownership in the Micro Cap Fund is approximately 28.9%), the investee will be consolidated into the Company’s financial statements. Further, as managing member of an investee, the Company is generally presumed to control the investee (and should consolidate the investee into the Company’s financial statements) unless this presumption is overcome because members of the investee other than the Company and its affiliates have the substantive ability to dissolve the investee or otherwise remove the Company as the managing member without cause. After considering the above with respect to the investment in the Micro Cap Fund and the Financial Accounting Standards Board’s (FASB) guidance on investment in equity and variable interests, the Company determined that the Micro Cap Fund should not be consolidated because the Company’s investment is less than 50% of the total investment, the Company can be removed from its position as Managing Member at any time, with or without cause, by the vote of the other members owning a majority-in-interest of the capital accounts of the “Disinterested Members,” and the Company does not have a controlling financial interest in the Micro Cap Fund as the Company has no obligation to absorb gains or losses.

(4) Bank Loan

On March 11, 2004, Hennessy Advisors secured financing from US Bank National Association to acquire the management contracts for certain Lindner Funds. The loan has been amended several times, most recently on September 27, 2010. As of June 30, 2012, the outstanding balance of $2.1 million requires 39 monthly payments in the amount of $52,083 plus interest at the bank’s prime rate (currently 3.25%, in effect since December 17, 2008) less one percent (effective interest rate of 2.25%) and is secured by the Company’s assets. The final installment of the then outstanding principal and its interest are due September 30, 2015. The loan agreement includes certain reporting requirements and loan covenants requiring the maintenance of certain financial ratios. The Company is in compliance as of June 30, 2012.

In connection with securing the financing discussed above, Hennessy Advisors incurred loan costs in the amount of $31,250, which are being amortized on a straight-line basis over 60 months. These costs are included in other assets on the balance sheet, net of accumulated amortization.

- 9 -

(5) Investment Advisory and Shareholder Service Fee Revenue

Investment advisory and shareholder services, which are the Company’s primary sources of revenue, are recorded when earned. The Company receives investment advisory fees monthly at an annual rate of 0.74% of the average daily net assets of the Hennessy Cornerstone Growth Fund, the Hennessy Focus 30 Fund, the Hennessy Cornerstone Large Growth Fund, and the Hennessy Cornerstone Value Fund; at an annual rate of 0.85% of the average daily net assets of the Hennessy Select Large Value Fund; at an annual rate of 1.00% of the Hennessy Select SPARX Japan Fund; and at an annual rate of 1.20% of the Hennessy Select SPARX Japan Smaller Companies Fund. The annual advisory fee for the Hennessy Balanced Fund and the Hennessy Total Return Fund is 0.60%, and the annual advisory fee for the Micro Cap Fund is 2.0% of the aggregate capital accounts of the members, but no management fee is charged to the capital account of the Company.

The Company has delegated the day-to-day portfolio management of the Hennessy Select Large Value Fund, the Hennessy Select SPARX Japan Fund and the Hennessy Select SPARX Japan Smaller Companies Fund (the “Select Funds”) to sub-advisors. Hennessy Advisors pays RBC Global Asset Management (U.S.) Inc. at an annual rate of 0.35% of the average daily net assets of the Hennessy Select Large Value Fund; and Hennessy Advisors pays SPARX Asset Management Co., Ltd. at an annual rate of 0.35% of the average daily net assets of the Hennessy Select SPARX Japan Fund and of 0.20% of the average daily net assets of the Hennessy Select SPARX Japan Smaller Companies Fund.

Fees are earned for shareholder support services provided for each of the original class shares of the nine Hennessy Funds. The shareholder service fees are charged at an annual rate of 0.1% of average daily net assets.

In the Micro Cap Fund, an additional “incentive allocation” can potentially be earned on any member’s balance, other than the Company’s balance. The allocation is determined at the end of each calendar quarter as 20% of the amount by which net profits (defined as the amount by which the net asset value on the last day of a period exceeds the net asset value on the commencement of the same period), if any, exceed the positive balance, if any, of a member’s loss carryforward (defined as a memorandum account kept for each member having an initial balance of zero that is increased by the net loss, if any, allocated to each member for each calendar period). The incentive fee is calculated and earned on the last day of the quarter, at which point it would be recognized in accordance with FASB guidance on revenue recognition, which specifies that the following criteria must be met for revenue recognition: persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery has occurred or the service has been rendered, the fee is fixed and determinable, and collectability is probable. The incentive income is not subject to any clawback provisions that would require us to return fees to investors. There was no incentive fee earned in the nine months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011.

- 10 -

(6) Income Taxes

The following is our tax position at June 30, 2012 and 2011:


	6/30/2012		6/30/2011
Current
Federal	$	52,600	$	165,000
State		22,000		42,500

		74,600		207,500

Deferred
Federal		392,700		410,900
State		97,800		56,200

		490,500		467,100

Total	$	565,100	$	674,600

The tax effects of temporary differences that give rise to significant portions of deferred tax assets and liabilities as of June 30, 2012 and September 30, 2011 are presented below:


	6/30/2012			9/30/2011
Current deferred tax assets:
Accrued compensation	$	27,500		$	53,100
Deferred rent		29,900			9,500
State taxes		7,500			20,400
Charitable Contribution Carryover		92,300			80,400

Total deferred tax assets		157,200			163,400

Noncurrent deferred tax liabilities:
Net operating loss		44,800			42,000
Property and equipment		600			(9,500	)
Management contracts		(4,399,800	)		(3,880,500	)

Total deferred tax liabilities		(4,354,400	)		(3,848,000	)

Net deferred tax liabilities	$	(4,197,200	)	$	(3,684,600	)

The Company files U.S. federal and state tax returns and has determined that its major tax jurisdictions are the United States and California. The tax years ended in 2007 through 2010 remain open and subject to examination by the appropriate governmental agencies in the U.S., and the 2004 through 2010 tax years remain open in California.

The Company’s effective tax rates for the nine months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, were 44.6% and 41.5%, respectively, and differ from the federal statutory rate of 34% primarily due to the effects of state income taxes. The effective tax rate for the current period ended June 30, 2012 is abnormally high due to a non-recurring revaluation of the Company's state deferred tax liabilities to reflect a higher blended state tax rate.

- 11 -

(7) Earnings per Share and Dividends per Share

Basic earnings per share are determined by dividing net earnings by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding, while diluted earnings per share are determined by dividing net earnings by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding adjusted for the dilutive effect of common stock equivalents.

There were 439,738 common stock equivalents, consisting of unexercised options, excluded from the per share calculation for the nine months ended June 30, 2012 because they were anti-dilutive. There were 653,175 common stock equivalents, consisting of unexercised options and unvested Restricted Stock Units (“RSUs”), excluded from the per share calculation for the nine months ended June 30, 2011 because they were anti-dilutive.

Quarterly cash dividends of $0.025, $0.03125 and $0.03125 per share, respectively, were paid on December 8, 2011 to shareholders of record as of November 15, 2011; on March 1, 2012 to shareholders of record as of February 7, 2012; and on June 8, 2012 to shareholders of record as of May 18, 2012.

(8) Stock-Based Compensation

On May 2, 2001, the Company established an omnibus incentive plan (the Plan) providing for the issuance of options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, performance awards, and stock loans for the purpose of attracting and retaining executive officers and key employees. The maximum number of shares which may be issued under the Plan is 25% of the outstanding common stock of the Company, subject to adjustment by the compensation committee of the Board of Directors. The 25% limitation does not invalidate any awards made prior to a decrease in the number of outstanding shares, even though such awards have resulted or may result in shares constituting more than 25% of the outstanding shares being available for issuance under the Plan. Shares available under the Plan which are not awarded in one particular year may be awarded in subsequent years. The compensation committee of the Board of Directors has the authority to determine the awards granted under the Plan, including among other things, the individuals who receive the awards, the times when they receive them, vesting schedules, performance goals, whether an option is an incentive or nonqualified option and the number of shares to be subject to each award. However, no participant may receive options or stock appreciation rights under the Plan for an aggregate of more than 75,000 shares in any calendar year. The exercise price and term of each option or stock appreciation right is fixed by the compensation committee except that the exercise price for each stock option which is intended to qualify as an incentive stock option must be at least equal to the fair market value of the stock on the date of grant and the term of the option cannot exceed 10 years. In the case of an incentive stock option granted to a 10% shareholder, the exercise price must be at least 110% of the fair market value on the date of grant and cannot exceed five years. Incentive stock options may be granted only within ten years from the date of adoption of the Plan. The aggregate fair market value (determined at the time the option is granted) of shares with respect to which incentive stock options may be granted to any one individual, which stock options are exercisable for the first time during any calendar year, may not exceed $100,000. An optionee may, with the consent of the compensation committee, elect to pay for the shares to be received upon exercise of their options in cash or shares of common stock or any combination thereof.

- 12 -

The exercise price of all options granted under the Plan was equal to the market price of the underlying common stock on the grant date and all options were granted and fully vested on the grant date. There were no options granted during the nine months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011.

Under the Plan, participants may be granted RSUs, representing an unfunded, unsecured right to receive a Company common share on the date specified in the recipient’s award. The Company issues new shares for shares delivered for RSU recipients. The RSUs granted under the Plan vest over four years, at a rate of 25 percent per year. The Company recognizes compensation expense on a straight-line basis over the four-year vesting term of each award. There were no RSUs granted during the nine months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011. RSU activity for the nine months ended June 30, 2012 was as follows:


	Restricted Stock Unit Activity Nine Months Ended June 30, 2012
	Number of Restricted Share Units			Weighted Fair Value Per Share Each Date
Non-vested Balance at September 30, 2011		15,949		$	5.28
Granted		—			—
Vested (1)		(11,706	)		3.73
Forfeited		—			—

Non-vested Balance at June 30, 2012		4,243		$	2.66

(1)

The restricted stock units vested includes partially vested shares. Shares of common stock have not been issued for the partially vested shares, but the related compensation costs have been expensed. Additionally, some of the shares issued in the current year were partially vested (and expensed) in the prior fiscal year. There were 13,406 shares of common stock issued for restricted stock units vested (net of shares repurchased for tax withholding) in the nine months ended June 30, 2012.

- 13 -


	Restricted Stock Unit Compensation Nine Months Ended June 30, 2012
	(In Thousands)
Total expected compensation expense related to Restricted Stock Units	$	2,152
Compensation Expense recognized as of June 30, 2012		(2,141	)

Unrecognized compensation expense related to RSU’s at June 30, 2012	$	11

As of June 30, 2012, there was $0.01 million of total RSU compensation expense related to non-vested awards not yet recognized, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average vesting period of 4 months.

(9) Commitments and Contingencies

The Company’s headquarters is located in leased office space under a single non-cancelable operating lease at 7250 Redwood Blvd., Suite 200, in Novato, California. There were no other commitments or contingencies as of June 30, 2012.

On March 1, 2012, the Company signed an amended lease agreement for the Novato office space extending the lease term through June 30, 2014 with an option for an additional two years thereafter. The amendment includes $0.11 million of free rent at the beginning of the new term, and subsequently a cost of $1.95 per square foot, which is a decrease from $2.05 per square foot prior to the lease amendment. Effective April 1, 2013, there is a rent increase to $2.05 per square foot. The straight-line rent expense through March 31, 2014, the end of the lease amendment, is $1.67 per square foot, or $0.02 million per month.

(10) Fair Value Measurements

In September, 2006, the FASB issued new standard “Fair Value Measurements,” which was effective for our fiscal year 2009. In February, 2008, the FASB issued a new standard which delayed the effective date for all non-financial assets and liabilities, except those that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a recurring basis, to the fiscal year beginning after November 15, 2008 (our fiscal year 2010). The Company adopted the fair value measurement for all financial and non-financial assets and liabilities as of October 1, 2009. Based on the scope of the new accounting guidance, all of the non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities on the Company’s balance sheet are excluded from the new accounting guidance. The standard defines fair value as “the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date.” It also establishes a fair value hierarchy consisting of the following three “levels” that prioritize the inputs to the valuation techniques used to measure fair value:

•

Level 1 - quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that are accessible at the measurement date.

- 14 -

•

Level 2 - from other than quoted market prices that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly (namely, similar assets or from markets that are not active).

•

Level 3 - unobservable and shall be used to measure fair value to the extent that observable inputs are not available (namely, reflecting an entity’s own assumptions).

Based on the definitions, the following table represents the Company’s assets categorized in the level 1 to 3 hierarchies as of June 30, 2012:


	Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date (amounts in thousands)
	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
Money market fund deposits	$	8,172	$	—	$	—	$	8,172
Mutual fund investments		6		—		—		6
Investment in domestic equities		—		407		—		407

Total	$	8,178	$	407	$	—	$	8,585

Amounts included in:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	8,172	$	—	$	—	$	8,172
Investments in marketable securities		6		—		—		6
Investment in the Hennessy Micro Cap Fund		—		407		—		407

Total	$	8,178	$	407	$	—	$	8,585

(11) New Accounting Pronouncements

In May 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued accounting updates to Accounting Standards Codification 820, Fair Value Measurements Topic – Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP, which provide clarifying guidance on how to measure fair value and additional disclosure requirements. The amendments prohibit the use of blockage factors at all levels of the fair value hierarchy and provide guidance on measuring financial instruments that are managed on a net portfolio basis. Additional disclosure requirements include transfers between Levels 1 and 2; and for Level 3 fair value measurements, a description of our valuation processes and additional information about unobservable inputs impacting Level 3 measurements. The updates are effective interim periods beginning after December 15, 2011 and will be applied prospectively. The adoption of this guidance did not have an impact on the Company’s financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

- 15 -

05,” Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Presentation of Comprehensive Income,” to effectively defer only those changes in Update 2011-05 that relate to the presentation of reclassification adjustments out of accumulated other comprehensive income. The guidance provided by this update becomes effective for annual periods beginning on or after December 15, 2011 (the Company’s fiscal year 2013). The adoption of this standard is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

In February 2012, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued amendments to Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2011-04 “Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in US GAAP and IFRS.” The amendments change the wording used to describe the requirements in US GAAP for measuring fair value and for disclosing information about fair value requirements and are a result of the joint efforts by the FASB and the IASB to develop a single, converged fair value framework on how to measure fair value and what disclosures to provide about fair value measurements. The guidance provided by this update becomes effective for interim and annual periods beginning on or after December 15, 2011 (the Company’s prior fiscal quarter). The adoption of this standard did not impact the Company’s financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

There have been no other significant changes in the Company’s critical accounting policies and estimates during the nine months ended June 30, 2012 as compared to what was previously disclosed in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2011 as filed with the SEC on December 9, 2011.

(12) Comprehensive Income

Comprehensive income includes all changes in equity during a period except those that resulted from investments by or distributions to the Company’s stockholders. Other comprehensive income (loss) refers to revenues, expenses, gains and losses that, under GAAP, are included in comprehensive income, but excluded from net income as these amounts are recorded directly as an adjustment to stockholders’ equity. The Company’s other comprehensive income is composed of unrealized gains on its investment in the Micro Cap Fund. The components of comprehensive income consisted of the following (in thousands):


	Nine Months Ended June 30,
	2012		2011
Net income attributable to stockholders	$	701	$	950

Other comprehensive income
Unrealized gain on investment		84		83

Total other comprehensive income		84		83

Total comprehensive income	$	785	$	1,033

- 16 -

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Forward Looking Statements

Certain statements in this report are forward-looking within the meaning of the federal securities laws. Although management believes that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, future levels of activity, performance or achievements cannot be guaranteed. Additionally, management does not assume responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of these statements. There is no regulation requiring an update of any of the forward-looking statements after the date of this report to conform these statements to actual results or to changes in our expectations.

Our business activities are affected by many factors, including, without limitation, redemptions by mutual fund shareholders, general economic and financial conditions, movement of interest rates, competitive conditions, industry regulation, fluctuation in the stock market, and others, many of which are beyond the control of our management.

Statements regarding the following subjects are forward-looking by their nature:

•

our business strategy, including our ability to identify and complete future acquisitions;

•

market trends and risks;

•

our assumptions about changes in the market place, especially with the extreme volatility in the global and US financial markets;

•

our estimates for future performance;

•

our estimates regarding anticipated revenues and operating expenses; and

•

our ability to retain the mutual fund assets we currently manage.

Although we seek to maintain cost controls, a significant portion of our expenses are fixed and do not vary greatly. As a result, substantial fluctuations in our revenue can directly impact our net income from period to period.

- 17 -

Overview

We derive our operating revenue from investment advisory fees and shareholder service fees paid to us by the Hennessy Funds. These fees are calculated as a percentage of the average daily net assets in our mutual funds and vary from fund to fund. The fees we receive fluctuate with changes in the total net asset value of the assets in our mutual funds, which are affected by our investment performance, redemptions, completed acquisitions of management agreements, market conditions and the success of our marketing efforts. Average assets under management were $798.5 million and $904.3 million for the nine months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

Total assets under management were $821.4 million as of June 30, 2012. Our total assets under management have decreased since June 30, 2011, due to net outflows. The following table illustrates the changes in assets under management from June 30, 2011 through June 30, 2012:


	Assets Under Management At Each Quarter End, June 30, 2011 through June 30, 2012
	6/30/2011			9/30/2011			12/31/2011			3/31/2012			6/30/2012
	(In Thousands)
Beginning assets under management	$	915,830		$	882,597		$	749,310		$	780,950		$	814,944
Organic inflows		19,221			63,907			32,172			28,167			80,366
Redemptions		(53,860	)		(64,510	)		(64,137	)		(75,389	)		(40,381	)
Market appreciation (depreciation)		1,406			(132,684	)		63,605			81,216			(33,523	)

Ending assets under management	$	882,597		$	749,310		$	780,950		$	814,944		$	821,406

The principal asset on our balance sheet, management contracts – net of accumulated amortization, represents the capitalized costs incurred in connection with the acquisition of management agreements. As of June 30, 2012, this asset had a net balance of $22.4 million.

The principal liability on our balance sheet is the bank debt incurred in connection with the acquisition of management contracts. As of June 30, 2012, this liability had a balance of $2.1 million.

- 18 -

Results of Operations

The following table displays items in the statements of operations as dollar amounts and as percentages of total revenue for the three months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011:


	Three Months Ended June 30,
	2012					2011
	(In thousands, except percentages)
	Amounts		Percent of Total Revenue			Amounts		Percent of Total Revenue
Revenue:
Investment advisory fees	$	1,523		88.8	%	$	1,709		88.9	%
Shareholder service fees		192		11.2			214		11.1
Other		—		—			—		—

Total revenue		1,715		100.0			1,923		100.0

Operating expenses:
Compensation and benefits		552		32.2			574		29.8
General and administrative		345		20.1			393		20.4
Mutual fund distribution		131		7.6			163		8.5
Sub-advisor fees		132		7.7			152		7.9
Amortization and depreciation		23		1.4			24		1.3

Total operating expenses		1,183		69.0			1,306		67.9

Operating income		532		31.0			617		32.1
Interest expense		12		0.7			15		0.8
Other income		—		—			—		—

Income before income tax expense		520		30.3			602		31.3
Income tax expense		217		12.6			250		13.0

Net income	$	303		17.7	%	$	352		18.3	%

Revenues: Total revenue decreased 10.8% to $1.7 million in the three months ended June 30, 2012, due to decreased average assets under management. Investment advisory fees decreased 10.9% to $1.5 million in the three months ended June 30, 2012, and shareholder service fees decreased 10.3% to $0.2 million in the three months ended June 30, 2012. The decrease in investment advisory and shareholder service fees is due to decreased average daily net assets in our mutual funds.

- 19 -

Average daily net assets in our mutual funds for the three months ended June 30, 2012 decreased by $84.3 million, or 9.4%, to $809.2 million from $893.5 million in the prior comparable period. The decrease in total assets under management from June 30, 2011, the end of the prior period, to the current period ended June 30, 2012 is mainly attributable to net outflows. The largest net outflows were from the Hennessy Cornerstone Value Fund ($24.0 million) and the Hennessy Select Large Value Fund ($16.6 million).

About 26.4% of the total average daily net assets ($216.5 million) for the period are concentrated in the Hennessy Cornerstone Growth Fund. All of the largest funds generate revenue at a rate of 0.84% of daily average assets, except for the Hennessy Select Large Value Fund, which generates revenue at a rate of 0.95% of daily average assets. However, the Company pays a sub-advisor fee of 0.35% of daily average assets of the Hennessy Select Large Value Fund, which reduces the net income generated by the fund for the Company.

Total net assets in our mutual funds decreased by $61.2 million, or 6.9%, as of June 30, 2012, from $882.6 million as of June 30, 2011, the end of the prior period. The $61.2 million decrease in net mutual fund assets is attributable to net outflows of $39.8 million and market depreciation of $21.4 million. Redemptions as a percentage of assets under management decreased from an average of 2.0% per month to 1.7% per month during the same period due to decreased outflows.

The net outflows are due to investors remaining apprehensive of the equity markets.

Redemptions from the funds were due, among other factors, to the following:

Due to the continued slow growth in our overall economy, the turmoil globally, and the lack of clarity from the U.S. Government on several important issues (taxes, healthcare, and regulation), it appears investors are not quite eager to jump back in and invest in mutual funds to the same extent they have in the past, and many continue to redeem their mutual fund investments.

- 20 -

Domestic unemployment continues to register at about 8 percent or higher as more than 15 million Americans look for work. Companies will continue to spend money on internal infrastructure, initiate and pay dividends, buy back their stock, and make acquisitions, and all of these practices are good for the stock market, but they do not create jobs.

However, we are confident that the overall economic environment is beginning to see signs of improvement, and investors have begun to return to investing in domestic equity funds (demonstrated by the net inflows we’ve experienced in our Funds in the past two months). Corporate earnings before tax were at an all-time high last year, and while many corporations may not see record growth in the coming year, we believe that corporate profits in the U.S. will remain strong.

In the past, the Company has been obligated to waive fees to comply with contractual expense ratio limitations for all classes of shares, but now only has contractual expense ratio limitations for institutional class shares. The Company does not normally waive fees (other than for institutional class shares), nor does it anticipate waiving fees, on a voluntary basis. There is no impact on the financial statements for the three months ended June 30, 2012.

Although the Company may earn incentive income on the Micro Cap Fund, the Company did not earn incentive income for the three months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011.

Operating Expenses: Total operating expenses decreased 9.4% to $1.2 million in the three months ended June 30, 2012, from $1.3 million in the prior comparable period. The decrease is due to decreases in all expense categories. As a percentage of total revenue, total operating expenses increased by 1.1% to 69.0% in the three months ended June 30, 2012, as compared to 67.9% in the prior comparable period.

Compensation and Benefits: Compensation and benefits decreased 3.8% to $0.55 million in the three months ended June 30, 2012, from $0.57 million in the prior comparable period. The decrease resulted primarily from decreased RSU compensation expense as awards continue to vest and no new awards have been granted. As a percentage of total revenue, compensation and benefits increased by 2.4% to 32.2% for the three months ended June 30, 2012, compared to 29.8% in the prior comparable period.

General and Administrative Expenses: General and administrative expense decreased 12.2% to $0.35 million in the three months ended June 30, 2012, from $0.39 million in the prior comparable period. The decrease resulted primarily from a decrease in office rent due to the transition of our trading headquarters from Stamford, Connecticut to our main headquarters in Novato, California. As a percentage of total revenue, general and administrative expense decreased by 0.3% to 20.1% in the three months ended June 30, 2012, from 20.4% in the prior comparable period.

Mutual Fund Distribution Expenses: Distribution expense decreased 19.6% to $0.13 million in the three months ended June 30, 2012, from $0.16 million in the prior comparable period. As a percentage of total revenue, distribution expense decreased by 0.9% to 7.6% for the three months ended June 30, 2012, compared to 8.5% in the prior comparable period.

- 21 -

The mutual fund distribution expense consists of fees paid for our mutual funds to be offered on various financial “platforms.” The platforms allow consumers to purchase shares from numerous mutual fund companies through a single location, which provides those customers with a single statement of investments and a single source for mutual fund information and customer service. When our funds are purchased through one of these platforms, such as Charles Schwab, Fidelity, TD Ameritrade or Morgan Stanley Smith Barney, the platform typically charges us an asset based fee which is recorded in “mutual fund distribution expense” in our statement of operations. The fees increase or decrease in line with the value of the funds held on the platforms, which can be affected by inflows, outflows and market impact.

The decreased costs in the current period are due to a decrease in the value of average assets held through mutual fund platforms such as Charles Schwab, Fidelity and TD Ameritrade. For the three months ended June 30, 2012, the value of the mutual funds held on Charles Schwab (the platform to which we pay over half of our total mutual fund distribution fees) decreased by 12.6% from the prior comparable period.

The incremental assets purchased through the mutual fund platforms are not as profitable as those purchased in direct shareholder accounts due to the participation fees paid on assets held in the various mutual fund platforms. All of our funds are impacted by activity on the financial platforms as they are all available on several platforms.

Sub-advisor Fee Expense: Sub-advisor fee expense decreased 13.2% to $0.13 million in the three months ended June 30, 2012, from $0.15 million in the prior comparable period. The decrease is a result of a decrease in sub-advised assets in the current period, mainly due to net outflows. As a percentage of total revenue, sub-advisor fee expense decreased by 0.2% to 7.7% for the three months ended June 30, 2012, compared to 7.9% in the prior comparable period.

Amortization and Depreciation Expense: Amortization and depreciation decreased 4.2% to $0.023 million in the three months ended June 30, 2012, from $0.024 million in the prior comparable period. As a percentage of total revenue, amortization and depreciation expense increased by 0.1% to 1.4% for the three months ended June 30, 2012, compared to 1.3% in the prior comparable period.

Interest Expense: Interest expense decreased by 20.0% from the prior comparable period due to payments of $0.6 million on the principal loan balance since the prior comparable period. As a percentage of total revenue, interest expense decreased by 0.1% to 0.7% for the three months ended June 30, 2012, compared to 0.8% in the prior comparable period.

Income Taxes: The provision for income taxes decreased 13.2% to $0.22 million in the three months ended June 30, 2012, from $0.25 million in the prior comparable period. The change is due to decreased income before tax in the current period.

Net Income: Net income decreased by 13.9% to $0.30 million in the three months ended June 30, 2012, from $0.35 million in the prior comparable period, as a result of the factors discussed above.

- 22 -

The following table displays items in the statements of operations as dollar amounts and as percentages of total revenue for the nine months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011:


	Nine Months Ended June 30,
	2012						2011
	(In thousands, except percentages)
	Amounts			Percent of Total Revenue			Amounts			Percent of Total Revenue
Revenue:
Investment advisory fees	$	4,591			89.0	%	$	5,200			88.9	%
Shareholder service fees		570			11.0			646			11.0
Other		—			—			5			0.1

Total revenue		5,161			100.0			5,851			100.0

Operating expenses:
Compensation and benefits		1,672			32.4			1,731			29.6
General and administrative		1,280			24.8			1,385			23.7
Mutual fund distribution		422			8.2			497			8.5
Sub-advisor fees		414			8.0			487			8.3
Amortization and depreciation		69			1.3			78			1.3

Total operating expenses		3,857			74.7			4,178			71.4

Operating income		1,304			25.3			1,673			28.6

Interest expense		39			0.9			49			0.9
Other income		(1	)		(0.1	)		(1	)		(0.0	)

Income before income tax expense		1,266			24.5			1,625			27.7

Income tax expense		565			10.9			675			11.5

Net income	$	701			13.6	%	$	950			16.2	%

Revenues: Total revenue decreased 11.8% to $5.2 million in the nine months ended June 30, 2012, due to decreased average assets under management. Investment advisory fees decreased 11.7% to $4.6 million in the nine months ended June 30, 2012, and shareholder service fees decreased 11.8% to $0.57 million in the nine months ended June 30, 2012. The decrease in investment advisory and shareholder service fees is due to decreased average daily net assets in our mutual funds.

Average daily net assets in our mutual funds for the nine months ended June 30, 2012 decreased by $105.8 million, or 11.7%, to $798.5 million from $904.3 million in the prior comparable period. The decrease in total assets under management from June 30, 2011, the end of the prior period, to the current period ended June 30, 2012 is mainly attributable to net outflows. The largest net outflows were from the Hennessy Cornerstone Value Fund ($24.0 million) and the Hennessy Select Large Value Fund ($16.6 million).

- 23 -

About 23.9% of the total average daily net assets ($193.3 million) for the period are concentrated in the Hennessy Cornerstone Growth Fund. All of the largest funds generate revenue at a rate of 0.84% of daily average assets, except for the Hennessy Select Large Value Fund, which generates revenue at a rate of 0.95% of daily average assets. However, the Company pays a sub-advisor fee of 0.35% of daily average assets of the Hennessy Select Large Value Fund, which reduces the net income generated by the fund for the Company.

Total net assets in our mutual funds decreased by $61.2 million, or 6.9%, as of June 30, 2012, from $882.6 million as of June 30, 2011, the end of the prior period. The $61.2 million decrease in net mutual fund assets is attributable to net outflows of $39.8 million and market depreciation of $21.4 million. Redemptions as a percentage of assets under management decreased from an average of 3.2% per month to 2.5% per month during the same period due to decreased outflows.

The net outflows are due to investors remaining apprehensive of the equity markets.

Redemptions from the funds were due, among other factors, to the following:

- 24 -

Although the Company may earn incentive income on the Micro Cap Fund, the Company did not earn incentive income for the nine months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011.

Operating Expenses: Total operating expenses decreased 7.7% to $3.9 million in the nine months ended June 30, 2012, from $4.2 million in the prior comparable period. The decrease is due to decreases in all expense categories. As a percentage of total revenue, total operating expenses increased by 3.3% to 74.7% in the nine months ended June 30, 2012, as compared to 71.4% in the prior comparable period.

Compensation and Benefits: Compensation and benefits decreased 3.4% to $1.67 million in the nine months ended June 30, 2012, from $1.73 million in the prior comparable period. The decrease resulted primarily from decreased RSU compensation expense as awards continue to vest and no new awards have been granted. As a percentage of total revenue, compensation and benefits increased by 2.8% to 32.4% for the nine months ended June 30, 2012, compared to 29.6% in the prior comparable period.

General and Administrative Expenses: General and administrative expense decreased 7.6% to $1.28 million in the nine months ended June 30, 2012, from $1.39 million in the prior comparable period. The decrease resulted primarily from a decrease in office rent due to the transition of our trading headquarters from Stamford, Connecticut to our main headquarters in Novato, California. As a percentage of total revenue, general and administrative expense increased by 1.1% to 24.8% in the nine months ended June 30, 2012, from 23.7% in the prior comparable period.

Mutual Fund Distribution Expenses: Distribution expense decreased 15.1% to $0.42 million in the nine months ended June 30, 2012, from $0.50 million in the prior comparable period. As a percentage of total revenue, distribution expense decreased by 0.3% to 8.2% for the nine months ended June 30, 2012, compared to 8.5% in the prior comparable period.

- 25 -

The decreased costs in the current period are due to a decrease in the value of average assets held through mutual fund platforms such as Charles Schwab, Fidelity and TD Ameritrade. For the nine months ended June 30, 2012, the value of the mutual funds held on Charles Schwab (the platform to which we pay over half of our total mutual fund distribution fees) decreased by 12.9% from the prior comparable period.

Sub-advisor Fee Expense: Sub-advisor fee expense decreased 15.0% to $0.41 million in the nine months ended June 30, 2012, from $0.49 million in the prior comparable period. The decrease is a result of a decrease in sub-advised assets in the current period, mainly due to net outflows. As a percentage of total revenue, sub-advisor fee expense decreased by 0.3% to 8.0% for the nine months ended June 30, 2012, compared to 8.3% in the prior comparable period.

Amortization and Depreciation Expense: Amortization and depreciation decreased 11.5% to $0.07 million in the nine months ended June 30, 2012, from $0.08 million in the prior comparable period. As a percentage of total revenue, amortization and depreciation expense remained the same at 1.3% compared to the prior comparable period.

Interest Expense: Interest expense decreased by 20.4% from the prior comparable period due to payments of $0.6 million on the principal loan balance since the prior comparable period. As a percentage of total revenue, interest expense remained the same at 0.9% compared to the prior comparable period.

Income Taxes: The provision for income taxes decreased 16.3% to $0.57 million in the nine months ended June 30, 2012, from $0.68 million in the prior comparable period. The change is due to decreased income before tax in the current period.

Net Income: Net income decreased by 26.2% to $0.7 million in the nine months ended June 30, 2012, from $1.0 million in the prior comparable period, as a result of the factors discussed above.

- 26 -

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In May 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued accounting updates to Accounting Standards Codification 820, Fair Value Measurements Topic — Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP, which provide clarifying guidance on how to measure fair value and additional disclosure requirements. The amendments prohibit the use of blockage factors at all levels of the fair value hierarchy and provide guidance on measuring financial instruments that are managed on a net portfolio basis. Additional disclosure requirements include transfers between Levels 1 and 2; and for Level 3 fair value measurements, a description of our valuation processes and additional information about unobservable inputs impacting Level 3 measurements. The updates are effective interim periods beginning after December 15, 2011 and will be applied prospectively. The adoption of this guidance did not have an impact on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

In December 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2011-12. The amendments in this Update supersede certain pending paragraphs in Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-05,” Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Presentation of Comprehensive Income,” to effectively defer only those changes in Update 2011-05 that relate to the presentation of reclassification adjustments out of accumulated other comprehensive income. The guidance provided by this update becomes effective for annual periods beginning on or after December 15, 2011 (our fiscal year 2013). The adoption of this standard is not expected to have a material impact on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

In February 2012, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued amendments to Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2011-04 “Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in US GAAP and IFRS.” The amendments change the wording used to describe the requirements in US GAAP for measuring fair value and for disclosing information about fair value requirements and are a result of the joint efforts by the FASB and the IASB to develop a single, converged fair value framework on how to measure fair value and what disclosures to provide about fair value measurements. The guidance provided by this update becomes effective for interim and annual periods beginning on or after December 15, 2011 (our prior fiscal quarter). The adoption of this standard did not impact our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

Critical Accounting Policies

Accounting policies, methods, and estimates are an integral part of the financial statements prepared by management and are based upon management’s current judgments. Those judgments are normally based on knowledge and experience with regard to past and current events and assumptions about future events. Certain accounting policies, methods, and estimates are particularly sensitive because of their significance to the financial statements and because of the possibility that future events affecting them may differ markedly from management’s current judgment.

Our operating revenues consist of contractual management and shareholder service fees. We earn our management fees through portfolio management of our mutual funds and private pooled equity fund, and we earn our shareholder service fees by assisting customers in purchases, sales,

- 27 -

distribution and customer service. The revenues are earned and calculated daily by our fund accountant. In accordance with the FASB guidance on revenue recognition, the fees are recognized monthly by the Company. Our contractual agreements provide persuasive evidence that an arrangement exists with fixed and determinable fees, and the services are rendered daily. The collectability is probable as the fees are received from our fund accountant in the month subsequent to the month in which the services are provided.

The management agreements acquired by the Company are considered intangible assets with an indefinite life. In June 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued the FASB guidance “Intangibles—Goodwill and Other.” It states that goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite useful lives are not amortized, but are tested at least annually for impairment. We fully implemented the provisions of the FASB guidance on October 1, 2002, at which time we ceased amortization of these intangible assets. Impairment analysis is conducted annually and coincides with our annual financial reporting. Additionally, we make a quarterly assessment to determine if a triggering event has occurred.

In conducting the annual impairment analysis, the future revenues are calculated as a percent of assets under management based on our existing management agreements with the Hennessy Funds. The future expenses are based on projections of our current expenses, adjusted for changes in the assets under management. For example, variable expenses such as platform fees and sub-advisor fees grow in direct proportion with our assets under management. Other semi-variable expenses, such as office rent and professional services, grow at a rate slower than the growth in assets under management. Specifically, the projected revenues and expenses are based on assumptions about the growth of our assets under management. Since our management contracts have an indefinite life, the projections of revenues and expenses in theory are calculated into perpetuity. The actual values, however, were calculated over the future 15 years, and the value developed for the periods beyond the 15 year forecast is reflected in the terminal value calculation. Ultimately, growth rates of equities over the long-term were used in estimating future rates, primarily based on the consistent tendency of returns to center about the 11% range, as evidenced by S&P 500 returns since inception. In addition, studies have concluded that in general, flows into various mutual fund groups are highly correlated with market performance, which suggests the Hennessy Funds will average reasonable inflows over the future 15 years in response to market appreciation.

With the help of an independent valuation firm, management measured the fair value of the management contracts by incorporating their estimates and assumptions into a projection of future revenues, based in part upon estimates of assets under management growth and client attrition, and expenses. Based on the analysis, we concluded that projected revenues exceed projected expenses by an amount that is greater than the current carrying value of the management contracts. We therefore concluded that the management contract assets are not impaired as of September 30, 2011. We continually evaluate whether events or circumstances have occurred that indicate the management contracts may be impaired. If future valuations in the marketplace decline, the valuation of management agreements acquired may become impaired and net earnings would be negatively impacted by the resulting impairment adjustment. As of June 30, 2012, no triggering events or circumstances occurred that indicated potential impairment of the management contracts.

- 28 -

The costs related to the Company’s acquisition of management contracts are capitalized as incurred. The costs are defined as an ‘intangible asset’ per FASB standard “Intangibles — Goodwill and Other.” The acquisition costs include legal fees, fees for soliciting shareholder approval and a percent of asset costs to acquire the management contracts. The amounts are included in the management contract asset totaling $22.4 million as of June 30, 2012.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

We continually review our capital requirements to ensure that we have sufficient funding available to support our growth strategies. Management anticipates that cash and other liquid assets on hand as of June 30, 2012 will be sufficient to meet our short-term capital requirements. To the extent that liquid resources and cash provided by operations are not adequate to meet long-term capital requirements, management plans to raise additional capital through debt or equity markets. There can be no assurance that we will be able to borrow funds or raise additional equity.

Total assets under management as of June 30, 2012 were $821.4 million, which was an increase of $72.1 million, or 9.6%, from September 30, 2011. The primary source of our revenue, liquidity and cash flow are our fees, which are based on and generated by our average assets under management. Property and equipment and management agreements acquired totaled $22.4 million as of June 30, 2012. We also invested $0.5 million in the Micro Cap Fund on October 30, 2007 (fair market value of $0.4 million as of June 30, 2012). We intend to keep this investment, decreasing our short-term liquidity. Our remaining assets are very liquid, consisting primarily of cash and receivables derived from mutual fund asset management activities. As of June 30, 2012, we had cash and cash equivalents of $8.6 million.

On June 6, 2012, Neil Hennessy, Chief Executive Officer and President of Hennessy Advisors, Inc., announced that Hennessy Advisors, Inc. signed a definitive agreement with FBR Fund Advisers, Inc. to purchase the assets related to the management of the entire family of ten FBR Funds (“The FBR Funds”). The FBR Funds currently have assets exceeding $1.9 billion. The acquisition transaction is expected to be completed before the end of our first quarter of fiscal year 2013 (December 31, 2012), subject to regulatory review and the approval of the FBR Funds’ shareholders. The acquisition will be funded through an additional bank loan. All costs related to the acquisition ($0.04 million as of June 30, 2012) will be capitalized, but the costs will be expensed, adversely effecting earnings, if the acquisition is not approved by a vote of the shareholders of the FBR Funds.

- 29 -

The following table summarizes key financial data relating to our liquidity and use of cash for the nine months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011:


	For the Nine Months Ended June 30, (unaudited, in thousands)
	2012			2011
Cash flow data:
Operating cash flows	$	1,289		$	1,384
Investing cash flows		(106	)		(42	)
Financing cash flows		(958	)		(1,218	)

Net increase in cash and cash equivalents	$	225		$	124

The $0.1 million decrease in cash provided by operating activities is mainly due to a $0.25 million decrease in net income in the current period, partly offset by $0.1 million increase in deferred rent due to rent abatement negotiated as part of the renewed office lease.

The increase in cash used in investing activities is due to $0.04 million paid to merge the Hennessy Cornerstone Growth Fund, Series II into the Hennessy Cornerstone Growth Fund in October, 2011, and $0.04 million paid as part of the ongoing acquisition of the FBR Funds.

The decrease in cash used in financing activities is due to a decrease in dividends paid to shareholders in the current period. In the prior period, we paid an annual dividend of $0.51 million in addition to quarterly dividend of $0.29 million as we were transitioning to quarterly dividends. In the current period, we paid quarterly dividends of $0.50 million to shareholders.

Our Bank Loan: We have an outstanding bank loan with U.S. Bank National Association. We incurred $7.9 million of indebtedness in connection with acquiring the management agreements for the Lindner Funds and an additional $6.7 million of indebtedness in connection with acquiring the management agreement for The Henlopen Fund. The indebtedness we incurred to acquire the management agreement of The Henlopen Fund was rolled into a single loan with the indebtedness we incurred to acquire the management agreements of the Lindner Funds. On September 27, 2010, we amended the loan to borrow an additional $2.0 million, which bears interest at U.S. Bank National Association’s prime rate, as set by U.S. Bank National Association from time to time, less one percent (2.25% as of December 17, 2008) and is secured by the Company’s assets. The loan was amended to require 60 monthly payments in the amount of $52,083 plus interest, with the final installment of the then outstanding principal and interest due on September 30, 2015. The loan agreement includes certain reporting requirements and loan covenants requiring the maintenance of certain financial ratios. We are in compliance with our loan covenants as of June 30, 2012. As of June 30, 2012, we have $2.1 million currently outstanding under our bank loan.

- 30 -

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

An evaluation was performed by management of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as of June 30, 2012. Based on that evaluation, management, including the Company’s principal executive and principal financial officers, concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective.

There has been no change in the internal control over financial reporting identified in connection with the evaluation required by paragraph (d) of Rules 13a-15 and 15d-15 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 that occurred during the Company’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

Part II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 6.

Exhibits


2.0		Asset Purchase Agreement, dated as of June 6, 2012, between Hennessy Advisors, Inc. and FBR Fund Advisers, Inc.(1)*

31.1		Rule 13a-14a Certification of the Chief Executive Officer

31.2		Rule 13a-14a Certification of the Chief Financial Officer

32.1		Written Statement of the Chief Executive Officer, Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350

32.2		Written Statement of the Chief Financial Officer, Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350

101**		Financial statements from the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Hennessy Advisors, Inc. for the quarter ended June 30, 2012, filed on August 2, 2012, formatted in XBRL: (i) the Condensed Statements; (ii) the Condensed Balance Sheets; (iii) the Condensed Statement of Cash Flows; and (iv) the Notes to Unaudited Condensed Financial Statements, tagged in detail.

(1)	Incorporated by reference from the Company’s Form 8-K (SEC File No. 000-49872) filed June 8, 2012.

*	The related schedules to the agreement are not being filed herewith. The registrant agrees to furnish supplementally a copy of any such schedules to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request.

In accordance with Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, the information in these exhibits shall not be deemed to be “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to liability under that section, and shall not be incorporated by reference into any registration statement or other document filed under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, except as expressly set forth by specific reference in such filing.

- 31 -

Signatures

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized:


	HENNESSY ADVISORS, INC.

Date: August 2, 2012	By:	/s/ Teresa M. Nilsen
		Teresa M. Nilsen, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary

- 32 -

EXHIBIT INDEX


2.0		Asset Purchase Agreement, dated as of June 6, 2012, between Hennessy Advisors, Inc. and FBR Fund Advisers, Inc.(1)*

31.1		Rule 13a-14a Certification of the Chief Executive Officer

31.2		Rule 13a-14a Certification of the Chief Financial Officer

32.1		Written Statement of the Chief Executive Officer, Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350

32.2		Written Statement of the Chief Financial Officer, Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350

101**		Financial statements from the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Hennessy Advisors, Inc. for the quarter ended June 30, 2012, filed on August 2, 2012, formatted in XBRL: (i) the Condensed Statements; (ii) the Condensed Balance Sheets; (iii) the Condensed Statement of Cash Flows; and (iv) the Notes to Unaudited Condensed Financial Statements, tagged in detail.

(1)	Incorporated by reference from the Company’s Form 8-K (SEC File No. 000-49872) filed June 8, 2012.

*	The related schedules to the agreement are not being filed herewith. The registrant agrees to furnish supplementally a copy of any such schedules to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request.

- 33 -

Large Accelerated Filer

Accelerated Filer

Non-accelerated Filer

Smaller Reporting Company