HG Holdings, Inc. - Annual Report: 2005 (Form 10-K)
UNITED
STATES
|
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
|
Washington,
D.C. 20549
|
FORM
10-K
|
ANNUAL
REPORT
PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
|
OF
THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
For
the fiscal year
ended December 31, 2005
Commission
file
number 0-14938
STANLEY
FURNITURE COMPANY, INC.
(Exact
name of
Registrant as specified in its Charter)
Delaware 54-1272589
|
(State
or
other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) (I.R.S.
Employer Identification No.)
|
1641
Fairystone Park Highway, Stanleytown, VA 24168
|
(Address
of
principal executive offices, Zip
Code)
|
Registrant’s
telephone number, including area code: (276)
627-2000
Securities
registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None
Securities
registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
Common
Stock,
par value $.02 per share
(Title
of
Class)
Indicate
by check
mark if the Registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule
405
of the Securities Act: Yes ( ) No (x)
Indicate
by check
mark if the Registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section
13 or
Section 15(d) of the Act: Yes ( ) No (x)
Indicate
by check
mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file
such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the
past
90 days: Yes (x) No ( )
Indicate
by check
mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation
S-K
(Section 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be
contained, to the best of Registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or
information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K
or any amendment to this Form 10-K. ( )
Indicate
by check
mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer,
or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large
accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act
Large
accelerated
filer ( ) Accelerated filer (x) Non-accelerated filer ( )
Indicate
by check
mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the
Exchange Act): Yes ( ) No (x)
Aggregate
market
value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates of
the
Registrant based on the closing price on July 2, 2005: $300
million.
Indicate
the number
of shares outstanding of each of the Registrant’s classes of common stock as of
January 27, 2006:
Common
Stock, par value $.02 per share 12,252,000
|
(Class
of
Common Stock) Number
of
Shares
|
Documents
incorporated by reference: Portions of the Registrant’s Proxy Statement for our
Annual Meeting of Stockholders scheduled for April 19, 2006 are incorporated
by
reference into Part III.
TABLE
OF
CONTENTS
Part 1 | Page | |||
Item
1
|
Business
|
3
|
||
Item
1A
|
Risk
Factors
|
6
|
||
Item
1B
|
Unresolved
staff comments
|
7
|
||
Item
2
|
Properties
|
8
|
||
Item
3
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
8
|
||
Item
4
|
Submission
of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
|
8
|
Part
II
Item
5
|
Market
for
Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder
|
|||
Matters
and
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
|
10
|
|||
Item
6
|
Selected
Financial Data
|
12
|
||
Item
7
|
Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
|
|||
and
Results
of Operations
|
13
|
|||
Item
7A
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risks
|
19
|
||
Item
8
|
Consolidated
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
|
19
|
||
Item
9
|
Changes
in
and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting
|
|||
and
Financial
Disclosure
|
19
|
|||
Item
9A
|
Controls
and
Procedures
|
19
|
||
Item
9B
|
Other
Information
|
19
|
Part
III
Item
10
|
Directors
and
Executive Officers of the Company
|
20
|
||
Item
11
|
Executive
Compensation
|
20
|
||
Item
12
|
Security
Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and
|
|||
Management
and Related Stockholder Matters
|
20
|
|||
Item
13
|
Certain
Relationships and Related Transactions
|
20
|
||
Item
14
|
Principal
Accounting Fees and Services
|
20
|
Part
IV
Item
15
|
Exhibits
and
Financial Statement Schedule
|
20
|
Signatures
|
25
|
|
Index
to
Consolidated Financial Statements and Schedule
|
F-1
|
|
Stanley
Furniture Company, Inc.
PART
I
Item
1. Business
General
We
are a leading designer and manufacturer of residential wood furniture
exclusively targeted at the upper-medium price range. We offer diversified
product lines across all major style and product categories within this price
range. This product depth and extensive style selection makes us a complete
wood
furniture resource for retailers in our price range and allows us to respond
more quickly to shifting consumer preferences. We have established a broad
distribution network that includes independent furniture stores, department
stores and regional furniture chains. To provide our products and support this
broad distribution network, we have implemented a blended operating strategy
combining efficient and flexible manufacturing processes with offshore sourcing
of component parts and finished goods. We incorporate selected imported
component parts and finished items in our product line to lower costs, provide
design flexibility and offer a better value to our customers. We emphasize
continuous improvement in our manufacturing and sourcing processes to enable
us
to continue providing competitive advantages to our customers, such as quick
delivery, reduced inventory investment, high quality and value.
Products
and Styles
Our
product
offerings cover all major design categories and include dining room, bedroom,
home office, home entertainment, accent tables and youth furniture marketed
as
Young America®. Recently we expanded our Young America® offerings to include
infant furniture marketed as Young America Baby™. We believe that the diversity
of our product lines enables us to anticipate and respond quickly to changing
consumer preferences and provides retailers a complete wood furniture resource
in the upper-medium price range. We believe that our products represent good
value and that the quality and style of our furniture compare favorably with
more premium-priced products.
We
provide products in a variety of woods, veneers and finishes. Our products
are
designed to appeal to a broad range of consumers and cover all major style
categories including American and European traditional, contemporary/modern,
transitional and cottage designs.
We
design and develop new product styles each year to replace discontinued items
or
styles and, if desired, to expand product lines. Our product design process
begins with marketing personnel identifying customer preferences and
conceptualizing product ideas, which generally consist of a group of related
furniture pieces. A variety of sketches are produced, usually by Company
designers, from which prototype furniture pieces are built prior to full-scale
production. We consult with our marketing personnel, sales representatives
and
selected customers throughout this process and introduce our new product styles
primarily at the fall and spring international furniture markets.
Distribution
We
have developed a broad domestic and international customer base and sell our
furniture through approximately 60 independent sales representatives to
independent furniture retailers, department stores and regional furniture
chains. Representative customers in alphabetical order include, Beverly Hall
Furniture Galleries, Carson Pirie Scott & Co., Furnitureland South, Gorman’s
Furniture, Jordan’s Furniture, Louis Shanks, Marshall Field’s, Nebraska
Furniture Mart, Raymour & Flanigan, Robb & Stucky, Rooms To Go Kids,
Schneiderman’s Furniture and Treasures Furniture. We believe this broad network
reduces exposure to regional recessions, and allows us to capitalize on emerging
channels of distribution. We offer tailored marketing programs to address each
channel of distribution.
The
general
marketing practice followed in the furniture industry is to exhibit products
at
international and regional furniture markets. In the spring and fall of each
year, a seven-day furniture market is held in High Point, North Carolina, which
is attended by most buyers and is regarded by the industry as the international
market. We utilize approximately 63,000 square feet of showroom space at the
High Point market to introduce new products, increase sales of our existing
products and test ideas for future products.
We
sold to approximately 3,200 customers during 2005 and approximately 4% of our
sales in 2005 were to international customers. No single customer accounted
for
more than ten percent of our sales in 2005. No material part of the business
is
dependent upon a single customer, the loss of which would have a material effect
on our business. The loss of several major customers could have a material
impact on our business.
Manufacturing
and Offshore Sourcing
Our
manufacturing
strategy combines offshore sourcing with domestic manufacturing. Domestic
manufacturing operations complement our product and distribution strategy by
emphasizing continuous improvement in quality and customer responsiveness while
reducing costs. These manufacturing processes produce smaller, more frequent
and
cost-effective runs. We focus on identifying and eliminating manufacturing
bottlenecks and waste, employing statistical process control and, in turn,
adjusting manufacturing schedules on a daily basis, using cellular manufacturing
in the production of components and improving our relationships with suppliers
by establishing primary supplier relationships. In addition, a key element
of
our manufacturing processes is to involve all Company personnel, from hourly
associates to management, in the improvement of the manufacturing processes
by
encouraging and responding to ideas to improve quality and to reduce
manufacturing lead times. Furthermore, each of our manufacturing facilities
is
focused on compatible products to improve quality and lower production
costs.
We
also integrate the sourcing of selected component parts and finished items
with
our domestic manufacturing operations to further enhance our product and
distribution strategy. We acquire selected finished items and component parts
from a limited number of offshore suppliers who can meet our quality
specifications, production efficiency and scheduling requirements. Approximately
32% of our sales volume in 2005 came from products sourced from six countries
with China representing the largest volume. We anticipate this percentage to
be
about 35% in 2006.
We
operate manufacturing facilities in North Carolina and Virginia consisting
of an
aggregate of approximately 3.2 million square feet. We consider our facilities
to be generally modern, well-equipped and well-maintained.
We
shipped customer orders within 14 days on average during 2005. We schedule
production of our various styles based upon actual and anticipated orders.
To
support our delivery performance, we maintain a higher inventory level of
sourced products compared to those we manufacture. Consequently, finished goods
inventory levels have increased from historical levels as the proportion of
our
sales from sourced products has increased. Since we ship customer orders on
average in 14 days, the size of our backlog is not necessarily indicative of
our
long-term operations. Our backlog of unshipped orders was $16.9 million at
December 31, 2005 and $20.6 million at December 31, 2004.
Raw
Materials
The
principal
materials used in manufacturing our products include lumber, veneers, plywood,
particle board, hardware, glue, finishing materials, glass products, laminates,
fabrics and metals. We use a variety of species of lumber, including cherry,
oak, ash, poplar, pine and maple. Our five largest raw material suppliers
accounted for approximately 26% of our purchases in 2005. We believe that our
sources of supply for these materials are adequate and that we are not dependent
on any one supplier.
Competition
We
ranked 16th
among the largest
furniture manufacturers in North America based on 2004 sales, according to
Furniture/Today,
a trade
publication. The furniture industry is highly competitive and includes a large
number of foreign and domestic manufacturers, none of which dominates the
market. In addition, competition has significantly increased from foreign
manufacturers in countries such as China and Vietnam which have lower production
costs. The markets in which we compete include a large number of relatively
small manufacturers; however, certain competitors have substantially greater
sales volumes and financial resources compared to us. Competitive factors in
the
upper-medium price range include style, price, quality, delivery, design,
service and durability. We believe that our manufacturing processes, our
sourcing strategy, long-standing customer relationships and customer
responsiveness, consistent support of existing diverse product lines that are
high quality and good value, and our experienced management are competitive
advantages.
Associates
At
December 31, 2005, we employed approximately 2,500 associates. None of our
associates are represented by a labor union. We consider our relationship with
our associates to be good.
Trademarks
Our
trade names
represent many years of continued business, and we believe these names are
well
recognized and associated with excellent quality and styling in the furniture
industry. We own a number of trademarks and design patents, none of which are
considered to be material.
Governmental
Regulations
We
are subject to federal, state and local laws and regulations in the areas of
safety, health and environmental protection. Compliance with these laws and
regulations has not in the past had any material effect on our earnings, capital
expenditures, or competitive position. However, the effect of such compliance
in
the future cannot be predicted. We believe that we are in material compliance
with applicable federal, state and local safety, health and environmental
regulations.
Forward-Looking
Statements
Certain
statements
made in this report are not based on historical facts, but are forward-looking
statements. These statements can be identified by the use of forward-looking
terminology such as “believes,” “estimates,” “expects,” “may,” “will,” “should,”
or “anticipates,” or the negative thereof or other variations thereon or
comparable terminology, or by discussions of strategy. These statements reflect
our reasonable judgment with respect to future events and are subject to risks
and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from
those in the forward-looking statements. Such risks and uncertainties include
competition in the furniture industry including competition from lower-cost
foreign manufacturers, disruptions in offshore sourcing including those arising
from supply or distribution disruptions or those arising from changes in
political, economic and social conditions, as well as laws and regulations,
in
China or countries from which we source products, international trade policies
of the United States and countries from which we source products, manufacturing
realignment, the inability to raise prices in response to inflation and
increasing costs, the cyclical nature of the furniture industry, the inability
to obtain sufficient quantities of quality raw materials in a timely manner,
failure to anticipate or respond to changes in consumer tastes and fashions
in a
timely manner, business failures or loss of large customers, environmental
compliance costs, and extended business interruption at manufacturing
facilities.
Available
Information
Our
principal
Internet address is www.stanleyfurniture.com. We make available free of charge
on this web site our annual, quarterly and current reports, and amendments
to
those reports, as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file
such material with, or furnish it to, the Securities and Exchange
Commission.
In
addition, you may request a copy of these filings (excluding exhibits) at no
cost by writing, telephoning, faxing or e-mailing us at the following address,
telephone number, fax number or e-mail address.
Stanley
Furniture
Company, Inc.
1641
Fairystone
Park Highway
Stanleytown,
Virginia 24168
Attention:
Mr.
Douglas I. Payne
Telephone:
276-627-2000
Fax:
276-629-5114
Or
e-mail your
request to: Investor@Stanleyfurniture.com
Item
1A. Risk
Factors
Our
results of operations and financial condition can be adversely affected by
numerous risks. You should carefully consider the risk factors detailed below
in
conjunction with the other information contained in this document. Should any
of
these risks actually materialize, our business, financial condition, and future
prospects could be negatively impacted.
We
may
not be able to sustain current sales and earnings due to the actions and
strength of our competitors. The
furniture
industry is very competitive and fragmented. We compete with many domestic
and
foreign manufacturers. Competition from foreign producers has increased
dramatically in the past few years, with more than half of all residential
wood
furniture sold in the United States coming from imports. These foreign producers
typically have lower selling prices due to their lower operating costs. Some
competitors have greater financial resources than we have and often offer
extensively advertised, well-recognized, branded products. As a result, we
are
continually subject to the risk of losing market share, which may lower our
sales and earnings.
As
a
result of our increased reliance on foreign sourcing:
· |
Our
ability to service customers could be adversely affected and result
in
lower sales and earnings. Our
sourcing
partners may not supply goods that meet our manufacturing, quality
or
safety specifications, in a timely manner and at an acceptable price.
We
may reject goods that do not meet our specifications and either
manufacture internally or find alternative sourcing arrangements
at a
higher cost, or may be forced to discontinue the product. Also, delivery
of goods from our foreign sourcing partners may be delayed for reasons
not
typically encountered with domestic manufacturing or sourcing, such
as
shipment delays caused by customs or labor issues.
|
· |
Changes
in political, economic, and socail conditiopns, as well as laws and
regulations, in China or other coountries from which we source products
could adversely affcet us. Foreign sourcing is subject to
polictical and social instability in China and other countries where
our
sourcing partners are located. This could make it more difficult
for us to
service our customers. Also, significant fluctuations of
foreign exchange rates against the value of the U.S. dollar could
increase costs and decrease earnings. In addition, an outbreak of
avian flu or similar epidemic in Asia or elsewhere may lower
our sales and earnings by disrupting our supply chain in the
countries impacted.
|
· |
International
trade policies of the United States and countries from which we source
products could adversely affect us.
Imposition
of trade sanctions relating to imports, taxes, import duties and
other
charges on imports could increase our costs and decrease our
earnings.
|
Manufacturing
realignment could result in a decrease in our earnings.
We
review our
domestic manufacturing operations and foreign sourcing program on an ongoing
basis. Certain individual products or product lines may be
shifted from
being domestically produced to being sourced and as a result we may reduce
our
domestic capacity. Manufacturing realignments could result in a decrease in
our
earnings.
We
may
not be able to maintain or to raise prices in response to inflation and
increasing costs. Future
market and
competitive pressures may prohibit us from raising prices to offset increased
raw material costs, freight costs and other inflationary items. This could
lower
our earnings.
We
may
not be able to sustain current sales and earnings due to economic downturns.
The
furniture
industry historically has been cyclical in nature and has fluctuated with
economic cycles. During economic downturns, the furniture industry tends to
experience longer periods of recession and greater declines than the general
economy. We believe that the industry is significantly influenced by economic
conditions generally and particularly by consumer behavior and confidence,
the
level of personal discretionary spending, housing activity, demographics, and
credit availability. These factors not only affect the ultimate consumer, but
also impact furniture retailers, which are our primary customers. As a result,
an economic downturn could lower our sales and earnings.
We
may
not be able to obtain sufficient quantities of quality raw materials in a timely
manner, which could result in a decrease in our sales and earnings.
Because
we are
dependent on outside suppliers for all of raw material needs, we must obtain
sufficient quantities of quality raw materials from our suppliers at acceptable
prices and in a timely manner. We have no long-term supply contracts with our
key suppliers. Unfavorable fluctuations in the price, quality and availability
of these raw materials could negatively affect our ability to meet demands
of
our customers and could result in a decrease in our sales and
earnings.
Failure
to anticipate or respond to changes in consumer tastes and fashions in a timely
manner could result in a decrease in our sales and
earnings.
Residential
furniture is a highly styled product and is subject to rapidly changing consumer
trends and tastes. If we are unable to predict or respond to changes in these
trends and tastes in a timely manner, we may lose sales and have to sell excess
inventory at reduced prices. This could lower our sales and earnings
Business
failures, or the loss, of large customers could result in a decrease in our
future sales and earnings. Although
we have no
customers that individually represent 10% or more of our total annual sales,
the
possibility of business failures, or the loss, of large
customers
could result in a decrease of our future sales and earnings. Lost sales may
be
difficult to replace and any amounts owed to us may become uncollectible.
Future
environmental costs could reduce our earnings.
We are subject to
federal and state environmental regulations that govern the release of
pollutants into the water and air, the disposal and management of toxic wastes
and substances and the cleanup of hazardous sites. The timing and ultimate
magnitude of costs for environmental compliance are difficult to predict and
could reduce our earnings.
Extended
business interruption at our manufacturing facilities could result in reduced
sales. Furniture
manufacturing creates large amounts of highly flammable wood dust. Additionally,
we utilize other highly flammable materials such as varnishes and solvents
in
our manufacturing processes and are therefore subject to the risk of losses
arising from explosions and fires. Our inability to fill customer orders during
an extended business interruption could negatively impact existing customer
relationships resulting in market share decreases.
Item
1B. Unresolved
staff
comments
None
Item
2. Properties
Set
forth below is
certain information with respect to our principal properties. We believe that
all these properties are well maintained and in good condition. All of our
plants are equipped with automatic sprinkler systems and modern fire protection
equipment, which we believe are adequate. All facilities set forth below are
active and operational. Production capacity and extent of utilization of our
facilities are difficult to quantify with certainty because maximum capacity
and
utilization varies periodically depending upon the product being manufactured,
the amount of component parts and finished items outsourced and the utilization
of the labor force at the facility. In this context, we estimate that our
facilities operated at approximately 70% to 75% of capacity in 2005, principally
on a one shift basis. We believe available capacity at our facilities together
with the integration of selected imported component parts and finished items
will be adequate to expand production to meet anticipated product
requirements.
Approximate
|
Owned
|
|||||
Facility
Size
|
or
|
|||||
Location
|
Primary
Use
|
(Square
Feet)
|
Leased
|
|||
Stanleytown,
VA
|
Manufacturing
and Corporate Headquarters
|
1,721,000
|
Owned
|
|||
Martinsville,
VA
|
Manufacturing
|
300,000
|
Owned
|
|||
Lexington,
NC
|
Manufacturing
|
635,000
|
Owned
|
|||
Robbinsville,
NC
|
Manufacturing
|
562,100
|
Owned
|
|||
High
Point,
NC
|
Showroom
|
63,000
|
Leased
|
|||
Martinsville,
VA
|
Warehouse
|
400,000
|
Leased
|
Item
3. Legal
Proceedings
In
the normal course of business, we are involved in claims and lawsuits none
of
which currently, in our opinion, will have a material adverse affect on our
consolidated financial statements.
Item
4. Submission
of
Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
None.
Executive
Officers of the Registrant
Our
executive
officers and their ages as of January 1, 2006 are as follows:
Name
|
Age
|
Position
|
||
Jeffrey
R.
Scheffer
|
50
|
Chairman,
President and Chief Executive
Officer
|
||
Douglas
I.
Payne
|
47
|
Executive
Vice President - Finance and
|
||
Administration
and Secretary
|
||||
Philip
D.
Haney
|
51
|
Executive
Vice President - Marketing/Sales
|
||
Stanley
Collections
|
||||
R.
Glenn
Prillaman
|
34
|
Senior
Vice
President - Marketing/Sales
|
||
Young
America®
|
||||
Robert
A.
Sitler, Jr.
|
45
|
Vice
President - Global Sourcing
|
Jeffrey
R.
Scheffer
has been Chairman
of the Board of Directors since April 2005 and Chief Executive Officer since
December 2002. Mr. Scheffer has been President since April 2001. He also served
as Chief Operating Officer from April 2001 to December 2002. Prior to his
employment with us, Mr. Scheffer served as President of American Drew, a
furniture manufacturer, for five years.
Douglas
I.
Payne has
been Executive
Vice President - Finance and Administration since April 2001. Mr. Payne
previously held the position of Senior Vice President - Finance and
Administration since December 1996. He was our Vice President of Finance and
Treasurer from September 1993 to December 1996. Prior to that time, Mr. Payne
held various financial management positions since his employment by us in 1983.
Mr. Payne has been our Secretary since 1988.
Philip
D.
Haney
has been Executive
Vice President - Marketing/Sales - Stanley Collections since August 2003. Mr.
Haney previously held the position of Executive Vice President - Marketing
and
Sales since his employment by us in October 2002. Prior to his employment with
us, Mr. Haney served as President of Karastan Rug and Home from August 2002
to
October 2002 and was Senior Vice President, Marketing and Sales at Karastan
from
1998 to August 2002.
R.
Glenn
Prillaman
has been Senior
Vice President - Marketing/Sales - Young America® since August 2003. Mr.
Prillaman previously held the position of Vice President - Product Manager
since
January 2002. Mr. Prillaman held various management positions in product
development for Young America® since June 1999. Mr. Prillaman is the son of
Albert L. Prillaman who serves as lead director on the Board of
Directors.
Robert
A.
Sitler, Jr.
has been Vice
President - Global Sourcing since September 2005. Mr. Sitler previously held
the
positions of Senior Vice President - Operations from November 2003 until
September 2005 and Vice President - Manufacturing Services from November 2001
until November 2003. Prior to that time, Mr. Sitler held various management
positions in credit, manufacturing, human resources, supply management and
global sourcing since his employment with us in 1985.
PART
II
Item
5. Market
for
Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and
Issuer
Purchases
of
Equity Securities
Our
common stock is
quoted on the Nasdaq Stock Market (“Nasdaq”) under the symbol STLY.
The
table below
sets forth the high and low sales prices per share, for the periods indicated,
as reported by Nasdaq, adjusted to reflect a two-for-one stock split,
distributed in the form of a stock dividend on June 6, 2005.
2005
|
2004
|
||||||||||||||||||
Dividends
|
Dividends
|
||||||||||||||||||
High
|
Low
|
Paid
|
High
|
Low
|
Paid
|
||||||||||||||
First
Quarter
|
$
|
26.85
|
$
|
21.61
|
$
|
.06
|
$
|
20.21
|
$
|
15.77
|
$
|
05
|
|||||||
Second
Quarter
|
24.49
|
19.14
|
.06
|
22.73
|
19.06
|
.05
|
|||||||||||||
Third
Quarter
|
30.89
|
23.16
|
.06
|
24.19
|
19.22
|
.05
|
|||||||||||||
Fourth
Quarter
|
26.59
|
19.31
|
.06
|
23.98
|
20.85
|
.05
|
As
of January 30, 2006, we have approximately 3,300 beneficial stockholders. In
January 2006, our Board of Directors revised our dividend policy to increase
our
annual dividend to $.32 per share. Our dividend policy is subject to review
and
revision by the Board of Directors and any future payments will depend upon
our
financial condition, our capital requirements and earnings, as well as other
factors the Board of Directors may deem relevant. Our ability to pay dividends
and repurchase our common stock is restricted under certain loan covenants.
See
Note 3 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Issuer
Purchases of Equity Securities
The
following table
represents share repurchase activity for the fourth quarter ended December
31,
2005:
Period
|
Total
number
of Shares purchased
|
Average
price
paid
Per
share
|
Total
number
of
shares
purchased
as
part of
publicly
announced
plans
or
programs
|
Maximumnumber
(or approximate dollar value) of shares that
may
yet be
purchased
under
the
plans or
programs
(a)
|
October
2 to
November 5, 2005
|
274,400
|
$
|
21.04
|
274,400
|
$
|
14,388,713
|
|||||||
November
6 to
December 3, 2005
|
309,760
|
23.32
|
309,760
|
$
|
7,164,381
|
||||||||
December
4 to
December 31, 2005
|
$
|
7,164,381
|
|||||||||||
Total
|
584,160
|
$
|
22.25
|
584,160
|
(a)
|
On
January
30, 2006, we announced that our Board of Directors increased our
stock
repurchase authorization by an additional $10 million. We previously
announced on each of April 27, 2005 and October 17, 2005 that our
Board of
Directors had increased our stock repurchase authorization by an
additional $10 million. The total amount authorized as of January
31, 2006
is $17.2 million. Consequently, we may purchase our common stock,
from
time to time, either directly or through agents, in the open market,
through negotiated purchases or otherwise, at prices and on terms
satisfactory to us.
|
Equity
Compensation Plan Information
The
following table
summarizes our equity compensation plans as of December 31, 2005:
Number
of
Shares
to
be issued
upon
exercise
of
outstanding
options,
warrants
and
rights
|
Weighted
average
exercise
price
of
outstanding
options,
warrants
And
rights
|
Number
of
shares
remaining
available
for
future
issuance
under
equity
compensation
plans
|
||||||||
Equity
compensation plans
|
||||||||||
approved
by
stockholders
|
655,128
|
|
$14.94
|
347,276
|
||||||
Equity
compensation plans
|
||||||||||
not
approved
by stockholders(1)
|
200,000
|
|
$13.94
|
|||||||
Total
|
855,128
|
|
$14.71
|
347,276
|
||||||
(1)Represents
a one
time option grant to Jeffrey R. Scheffer, in connection with his employment
as
our
President and
Chief Operating Officer in April 2001.
Item
6. Selected
Financial Data
Years
Ended December 31,
|
|||||||||||||||||||
2005
|
2004
|
2003
|
2002
|
2001
|
|||||||||||||||
|
(in
thousands, except per share data)
|
||||||||||||||||||
Income Statement Data: | |||||||||||||||||||
Net
sales
|
$
|
333,646
|
$
|
305,815
|
$
|
265,263
|
$
|
243,547
|
$
|
238,292
|
|||||||||
Cost
of sales
|
251,937
|
230,174
|
203,410
|
184,967
|
185,326
|
||||||||||||||
Restructuring
and related charges(1)
|
3,548
|
2,290
|
|||||||||||||||||
Gross
profit
|
81,709
|
75,641
|
61,853
|
55,032
|
50,676
|
||||||||||||||
Selling,
general and administrative
|
|||||||||||||||||||
expenses
|
44,267
|
40,953
|
35,637
|
32,671
|
30,482
|
||||||||||||||
Unusual
charge(2)
|
2,800
|
||||||||||||||||||
Restructuring
and related charges(1)
|
733
|
||||||||||||||||||
Operating
income
|
37,442
|
34,688
|
26,216
|
22,361
|
16,661
|
||||||||||||||
Other
income
(expense) net
|
288
|
188
|
203
|
219
|
(47
|
)
|
|||||||||||||
Interest
expense, net
|
1,825
|
2,343
|
2,748
|
3,090
|
4,007
|
||||||||||||||
Income
before
income taxes
|
35,905
|
32,533
|
23,671
|
19,490
|
12,607
|
||||||||||||||
Income
taxes
|
12,674
|
11,744
|
8,521
|
6,919
|
4,286
|
||||||||||||||
Net
income
|
$
|
23,231
|
$
|
20,789
|
$
|
15,150
|
$
|
12,571
|
$
|
8,321
|
|||||||||
Basic
Earnings Per Share:(3)
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Net
income
|
$
|
1.82
|
$
|
1.65
|
$
|
1.20
|
$
|
.95
|
$
|
.63
|
|||||||||
Weighted
average shares
|
12,766
|
12,574
|
12,651
|
13,218
|
13,220
|
||||||||||||||
Diluted
Earnings Per Share:(3)
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Net
income
|
$
|
1.77
|
$
|
1.59
|
$
|
1.17
|
$
|
.93
|
$
|
.61
|
|||||||||
Weighted
average shares(4)
|
13,154
|
13,099
|
12,923
|
13,564
|
13,800
|
||||||||||||||
Cash
dividends paid per share (3) (5)
|
$
|
.24
|
$
|
.20
|
$
|
.10
|
|||||||||||||
Balance
Sheet and Other Data:
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Cash
|
$
|
12,556
|
$
|
7,632
|
$
|
2,509
|
$
|
9,227
|
$
|
1,955
|
|||||||||
Inventories
|
69,961
|
73,658
|
54,638
|
54,158
|
49,522
|
||||||||||||||
Working
capital
|
91,200
|
88,567
|
64,455
|
62,944
|
51,271
|
||||||||||||||
Total
assets
|
190,488
|
188,888
|
164,203
|
172,485
|
163,003
|
||||||||||||||
Long-term
debt including
|
|||||||||||||||||||
current
maturities
|
11,428
|
15,685
|
22,700
|
29,614
|
37,053
|
||||||||||||||
Stockholders’
equity(4)
|
132,749
|
127,265
|
102,558
|
99,687
|
87,294
|
||||||||||||||
Capital
expenditures
|
$
|
4,986
|
$
|
1,718
|
$
|
1,243
|
$
|
1,037
|
$
|
4,172
|
|||||||||
Stock
repurchases:
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Shares
(3)
|
1,057
|
1,132
|
317
|
172
|
|||||||||||||||
Total
cost
|
$
|
22,993
|
$
|
14,788
|
$
|
3,066
|
$
|
1,973
|
(1) We
recorded
restructuring and related charges in 2002 of $3.5 million (or $.17 per diluted
share) and $3.0
million (or
$.15 per diluted share) in 2001 for the closure of a manufacturing facility.
(2) In
2001, we
recorded a $2.8 million (or $.13 per diluted share) charge to write off amounts
due from a major
customer.
(3)
Amounts have been retroactively
adjusted to reflect the two-for-one stock split, distributed in the form of
a
stock dividend, On June 6, 2005.
(4) In
2002, we issued
49,000 shares of our common stock to the Stanley Retirement Plan.
(5) No
dividends were
paid on common stock prior to 2003.
Item
7. Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
The
following
discussion should be read in conjunction with the Selected Financial Data and
the Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes.
Overview
Over
the past few
years the residential wood furniture industry has experienced a surge in low
cost imported products, primarily from China. Imports have grown dramatically
in
the past few years and according to industry sources it is estimated that
imports now account for over half of all residential wood furniture sold in
the
United States.
In
response to this trend we developed a blended strategy of combining our domestic
manufacturing capabilities with an offshore sourcing program and realigned
our
manufacturing capacity. We incorporate selected imported component parts and
finished items in our product line to lower costs, provide design flexibility,
and offer a better value to our customers. Sourced products increased to
approximately 32% of our sales in 2005 compared to 28% in 2004. We anticipate
this percentage will be about 35% in 2006.
The
increase in
offshore sourcing created excess capacity in our manufacturing facilities which
caused us to reduce and realign manufacturing capacity. We closed a
manufacturing facility in 2002 (our former West End, North Carolina factory)
and
reduced operations at another manufacturing facility in 2003. We have realigned
production so that each of our current manufacturing facilities is focused
on
specific product lines of compatible products to improve quality and lower
production costs.
These
actions
reduced our manufacturing capacity by approximately 15% to 20%. We operated
at
approximately 70% to 75% of this reduced capacity in 2005. We are maintaining
our manufacturing capacity at this level to provide protective capacity for
improved demand and to buffer supply chain disruptions on certain imported
products.
We
will continue to evaluate our manufacturing capacity needs considering offshore
sourcing opportunities, current and anticipated demand for our products, overall
market conditions and other factors we consider relevant. Should further
capacity reductions become necessary, this could cause asset impairment or
other
restructuring charges in the future.
Results
of
Operations
The
following table
sets forth the percentage relationship to net sales of certain items included
in
the Consolidated Statements of Income:
|
For
the Years Ended
|
|||||||||
|
December
31, 2005
|
|||||||||
2005
|
2004
|
2003
|
||||||||
Net
sales
|
100.0
|
%
|
100.0
|
%
|
100.0
|
%
|
||||
Cost
of
sales
|
75.5
|
75.3
|
76.7
|
|||||||
Gross
profit
|
24.5
|
24.7
|
23.3
|
|||||||
Selling,
general and administrative expenses
|
13.3
|
13.4
|
13.4
|
|||||||
Operating
income
|
11.2
|
11.3
|
9.9
|
|||||||
Other
income,
net
|
.1
|
.1
|
|
|||||||
Interest
income
|
.1
|
|||||||||
Interest
expense
|
.6
|
.8
|
1.0
|
|||||||
Income
before
income taxes
|
10.8
|
10.6
|
8.9
|
|||||||
Income
taxes
|
3.8
|
3.8
|
3.2
|
|||||||
Net
income
|
7.0
|
%
|
6.8
|
%
|
5.7
|
%
|
2005
Compared to
2004
Net
sales increased
$27.8 million, or 9.1%, in 2005 compared to 2004. The increase was due primarily
to higher average selling prices and to a lesser extent higher unit volume.
Industry sales trends were positive in 2005; however, it appears that sales
trends slowed in the latter part of the year, starting in late third
quarter.
Gross
profit margin
for 2005 decreased to 24.5% from 24.7% in 2004. Gross profit margin in 2005
was
negatively impacted by inflation in raw materials, wages, employee benefits,
energy costs, freight costs and tariffs imposed on wooden bedroom furniture
imported from China. Operating inefficiencies in 2005 compared to 2004 also
contributed to the lower gross profit margins. Partially offsetting these higher
costs were increased selling prices. We continue to experience inflationary
pressures in raw materials, compensation cost, energy and freight
costs.
Selling,
general
and administrative expenditures increased $3.3 million in 2005. This increase
resulted from higher selling expenses directly attributable to the increase
in
sales, additional warehouse expense and increased compensation cost. Warehouse
expense increased as a result of increased usage at our leased warehouse due
to
increased shipments of sourced product in 2005 compared to 2004.
As
a result of the above, operating income as a percentage of net sales was 11.2%
for 2005, compared to 11.3% for 2004.
Interest
expense
for 2005 decreased primarily due to lower average debt levels. Interest income
increased during 2005 due to higher amounts of cash.
The
effective tax
rate for 2005 is 35.3%, compared to 36.1% for 2004. The decrease in the
effective tax rate is a result of the “American Jobs Creation Act of 2004” which
allows for a deduction based on qualified domestic production activities. We
expect a modest decline in our effective tax rate as this deduction is phased
in
over the next six years. Our effective tax rate for 2006 is expected to be
in
the range of 35.0% to 35.3%.
2004
Compared to
2003
Net
sales increased
$40.6 million, or 15.3%, in 2004 compared to 2003. The increase was due
primarily to higher unit volume and to a lesser extent higher average selling
prices. While industry sales trends improved in 2004, we believe most of our
growth came from market share gains.
Gross
profit margin
for 2004 increased to 24.7% from 23.3% in 2003. Higher gross profit margin
in
2004 was primarily due to higher production levels at our domestic facilities
and savings from sourcing initiatives. Inflation in raw materials, wages,
employee benefits, energy costs and tariffs imposed on wooden bedroom furniture
imported from China were offset with modest price increases.
Selling,
general
and administrative expenses as a percentage of net sales were 13.4% for both
2004 and 2003. Selling, general and administrative expenditures increased in
2004 by $5.3 million. This increase resulted from higher selling expenses
directly attributable to the increase in sales (including additional warehouse
expense), increased bonus expense due to higher earnings and cost incurred
to
comply with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. These increases were partially
offset by a $334,000 net reversal of bad debt expense in 2004 due to a reduction
in accounts receivable from certain customers experiencing financial
difficulties compared to a net reversal of $20,000 in 2003.
As
a result of the above, operating income as a percentage of net sales was 11.3%
for 2004, compared to 9.9% for 2003.
Interest
expense
for 2004 decreased primarily due to lower average debt levels.
The
effective tax
rate for 2004 was 36.1% which was comparable to the 2003 effective tax
rate.
Financial
Condition, Liquidity and Capital Resources
Sources
of
liquidity include cash on hand, cash from operations and amounts available
under
a $25.0 million credit facility. These sources have been adequate for day-to-day
expenditures, debt payments, purchases of our stock, capital expenditures and
payment of cash dividends to stockholders. We expect these sources of liquidity
to continue to be adequate for the future.
Working
capital,
excluding cash and current maturities of long-term debt, decreased $3.7 million
during 2005 to $81.5 million from $85.2 million in 2004. The decrease was
primarily due to lower inventories.
With
the increase
of $10.0 million in our authorization to repurchase shares of our common stock
by the Board of Directors on January 30, 2006, approximately $17.2 million
is
currently authorized. Consequently, we may, from time to time, either directly
or through agents, repurchase our common stock in the open market, through
negotiated purchases or otherwise, at prices and on terms satisfactory to us.
Depending on market prices and other relevant conditions, such purchases may
be
discontinued at any time. The Board of Directors increased the annual dividend
policy to $.32 per share on January 30, 2006.
Cash
generated from
operations was $32.8 million in 2005 compared to $10.5 million in 2004 and
$14.3
million in 2003. The increase in 2005 was due to higher cash collections from
customers due to higher sales, partially offset by higher payments to suppliers
and employees primarily to fund higher production, increased purchases of
sourced product and higher selling and administrative expenses. The decrease
in
2004 compared to 2003 was due to higher payments to suppliers and employees,
partially offset by higher cash collections from customers. Payments to
suppliers and employees increased in 2004 compared to 2003, primarily to fund
increased purchases of sourced products, higher production and higher selling
and administrative expenses.
Net
cash used by
investing activities was $5.0 million in 2005 compared to $1.9 million in 2004
and $1.3 million in 2003, respectively. Capital expenditures in 2005 consisted
of normal machinery and equipment purchases and approximately $700,000 was
used
to improve the manufacturing flow and expand warehouse space at one of our
facilities. Over the past three years, capital expenditures were lower due
to
the relocation of a significant portion of machinery and equipment from a
facility we closed in 2002 to other facilities in lieu of normal replacements.
Capital expenditures for 2005 have returned to more historic levels at
approximately $5.0 million and we expect 2006 to remain at about this level.
As
both our sales and the proportion of sourced goods increased, our need for
additional warehouse space has increased. We are currently renting space to
accommodate our needs, but continue to evaluate long-term solutions which could
result in additional future capital expenditures.
Net
cash used by
financing activities was $22.9 million, $3.5 million and $19.7 million in 2005,
2004 and 2003, respectively. In 2005 and 2003, cash from operations and proceeds
from the exercise of stock options provided funds for the purchase and
retirement of our common stock, senior debt payments and cash dividends. In
2004, cash from operations and proceeds from the exercise of stock options
provided funds for senior debt payments and cash dividends. Over the last three
years $37.8 million was used to purchase 2.2 million shares of our common stock
in the open market at an average price of $17.26.
At
December 31, 2005, long-term debt including current maturities was $11.4
million. Debt service requirements are $2.9 million in both 2006 and 2007 and
$1.4 million in each 2008, 2009 and 2010. As of December 31, 2005, approximately
$25.0 million of borrowings were available under a revolving credit facility
and
cash on hand was $12.6 million.
The
following table
sets forth our contractual cash obligations and other commercial commitments
at
December 31, 2005: (in thousands)
Payment
due or commitment expiration
|
|||||
Less
Than
|
Over
|
||||
Total
|
1
year
|
1-3
years
|
3-5
years
|
5
years
|
|
Contractual
cash obligations:
|
|||||
Long-term
debt
|
$11,428
|
$2,857
|
$4,285
|
$2,857
|
$1,429
|
Postretirement
benefits other than pensions(1)
|
2,865
|
296
|
568
|
568
|
1,433
|
Fixed
interest payment on long-term debt
|
2,105
|
759
|
899
|
397
|
50
|
Operating
leases
|
2,602
|
872
|
1,303
|
427
|
|
Total
contractual cash obligations
|
$19,000
|
$4,784
|
$7,055
|
$4,249
|
$2,912
|
Other
commercial commitments:
|
|||||
Letters
of
credit
|
$
3,681
|
$3,681
|
(1) The
’83
Group
Annuity Mortality tables were used in estimating future benefit payments, and
the health care cost trend rate for determining payments is 9.5% for 2005 and
gradually declines to 5.5% in 2010 where it is assumed to remain constant for
the remaining years.
Our
pension plan is
frozen and under current valuations holds sufficient assets to cover future
benefit obligations. Therefore, we do not currently anticipate any cash funding
needs to meet minimum required funding thresholds.
Critical
Accounting Policies
We
have chosen accounting policies that are necessary to accurately and fairly
report our operational and financial position. Below are the critical accounting
policies that involve the most significant judgments and estimates used in
the
preparation of our consolidated financial statements.
Allowance
for
doubtful accounts - We maintain an allowance for doubtful receivables for
estimated losses resulting from the inability of trade customers to make
required payments. We provide an allowance for specific
customer
accounts
where collection is doubtful and also provide an allowance for other accounts
based on historical collection and write-off experience. Judgment is critical
because some customers have historically experienced financial difficulties.
As
the financial condition of these customers and the related receivable balances
change, the level of such allowances will be reevaluated.
Inventory
valuation
- Inventory is valued at the lower of cost or market. Cost for all inventories
is determined using the first-in, first-out (FIFO) method. We evaluate our
inventory to determine excess or slow moving items based on current order
activity and projections of future demand. For those items identified, we
estimate our market value or net sales value based on current trends. Those
items having a net sales value less than cost are written down to their net
sales value. This process recognizes projected inventory losses when they become
evident rather than at the time they are sold.
Long-lived
assets -
Property, plant and equipment is reviewed for possible impairment when events
indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable.
Assumptions and estimates used in the evaluation of impairment may affect the
carrying value of long-lived assets, which could result in impairment charges
in
future periods. Depreciation policy reflects judgments on the estimated useful
lives of assets.
Tax
contingencies -
Tax contingencies are recorded to address potential exposures involving tax
positions we have taken that could be challenged by taxing authorities. These
potential exposures result from the varying applications of statutes, rules,
regulations and interpretations. Our tax contingencies contain assumptions
based
on past experiences and judgments about potential actions by taxing
jurisdictions. The ultimate resolution of these matters may be greater or less
than the amount that we have provided.
Pension
costs - Our
pension expense is developed from actuarial valuations. Inherent in these
valuations are key assumptions, including discount rates used to determine
the
present value of future benefit payments and expected return on plan assets,
which are usually updated on an annual basis at the beginning of each year.
We
consider current market conditions, including changes in interest rates, in
making these assumptions. Changes in pension costs may occur in the future
due
to changes in these assumptions. The key assumptions used in developing 2005
net
pension costs were a discount rate of 5.5% and an expected return on plan assets
of 6.5% compared to 6.0% and 6.5% for the discount rate and expected return
on
plan assets, respectively, in 2004. In establishing our expected return on
plan
assets assumption, we review asset allocation considering plan maturity and
develop return assumptions based on different asset classes adjusting for plan
operating expenses. Actual asset over/under performance compared to expected
returns will respectively decrease/increase unrecognized loss. The change in
the
unrecognized loss will change amortization cost in upcoming periods. A one
percentage point change in the expected return assumption in the current year
would have resulted in a change in pension expense of $155,000.
The
discount rate
is established by comparing the projection of expected benefit payments, using
an assumption that 100% of participants will elect to receive a lump sum payment
upon retirement and participants currently receiving annuities will continue
to
receive benefits through a life annuity, to the Citigroup Pension Discount
Curve
(published monthly) as of December 31. The expected benefit payments are
discounted by each corresponding discount rate on the yield curve. Once the
present value of the string of benefit payments is established, we solve for
the
single spot rate to apply to all obligations of the plan that will match the
previously determined present value.
The
Citigroup
Pension Discount Curve is constructed beginning with a U.S. Treasury par curve
that reflects the entire Treasury and STRIPS market. From the Treasury curve,
Citibank produces a double -A corporate par curve by adding option-adjusted
spreads that are drawn from the double-A corporate sector of the Citigroup
Broad
Investment-Grade Bond Index. Finally, from the double-A corporate par curve,
Citigroup derives the spot rates that constitute the Pension Discount Curve.
For
payments beyond 30 years we extend the curve assuming that the discount rate
derived in year 30 is extended to the end of the plan’s payment
expectations.
Self-Insurance
- We
are self-insured for certain claims related to medical insurance and workers’
compensation. We maintain stop loss coverage with third party insurers to limit
our total exposure. The self-insurance liability represents an estimate of
the
ultimate cost of claims incurred and unpaid as of the balance sheet date. The
estimated liability is established based upon analysis of historical data and
is
reviewed on a quarterly basis to ensure that the liability is appropriate.
If
actual claims differ from our estimates, our financial results could be
impacted.
Tariffs
imposed on
wooden bedroom furniture imported from China - Tariff expense is based on the
most current rates published by the Department of Commerce. These rates are
potentially subject to an administrative review process starting approximately
one year after the publication date. The final amounts will depend on whether
administrative reviews are performed and the outcome of those reviews, if any,
on the vendors we purchase from. Consequently, any significant adjustments
to
these tariff rates could have a material impact on our financial
results.
We
do not have transactions or relationships with “special purpose” entities, and
we do not have any off balance sheet financing other than normal operating
leases primarily for showroom, warehousing space and certain technology
equipment.
Continued
Dumping and Subsidy Offset Act
The
Continued
Dumping and Subsidy Offset Act (CDSOA) provides for distribution of monies
collected by U.S. Customs from antidumping cases to qualifying domestic
producers where the domestic producers have continued to invest in their
technology, equipment and people. We received $29,000 in CDSOA payments in
2005.
The World Trade Organization (WTO) has ruled that such payments violate
international trade rules and the U.S. Trade Representative appealed this
ruling; however, the WTO upheld the ruling. Legislation is pending in the U.
S.
Congress to repeal CDSOA distributions to qualifying domestic producers for
tariffs collected after September 30, 2007.
According
to U.S.
Customs and Border Protection, as of October 1, 2005, approximately $116,900,000
has been collected in tariffs and is potentially available for distribution
under CDSOA to injured domestic manufacturers in connection with the case
involving wooden bedroom furniture imported from China. These funds are subject
to adjustment as the amount of the actual duties is determined retrospectively
after the results of any annual administrative reviews conducted by the U.S.
Department of Commerce. Further, certain importers have appealed the initial
findings of the anti-dumping order to the Court of International Trade and
favorable rulings for these importers could reduce the amount of duties
ultimately available for distribution. These funds are not available for
distribution until all legal appeals and administrative reviews have been
completed. Consequently, the amount ultimately available for distribution in
this case during 2006 will depend on amounts collected through December 31,
2005
and the result of any administrative reviews and pending legal appeals. Also,
any amount we may receive will depend on our percentage allocation, which is
based on our qualifying expenditures in relation to the qualifying expenditures
of other injured domestic producers requesting distribution for the relevant
time periods under CDSOA. Our percentage allocation for payments received in
2005 was approximately 20%. In view of the uncertainties associated with this
program, we are unable to predict the amounts, if any, we may receive in 2006
or
thereafter under CDSOA. However, assuming CDSOA distributions continue, these
distributions could be material depending on the results of legal appeals and
administrative reviews, and our actual percentage allocation.
New
Accounting Standards
In
November 2004,
the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of Financial
Accounting Standard No. 151, “Inventory Costs”. The new Statement amends
Accounting Research Bulletin No. 43, Chapter 4, “Inventory Pricing,” to clarify
the accounting for abnormal amounts of idle facility expense, freight, handling
costs, and wasted material. This Statement requires that those items be
recognized as current-period charges and requires that allocation of fixed
production overheads to the cost of conversion be based on the normal capacity
of the production facilities. This Statement is effective for fiscal years
beginning after June 15, 2005. We do not expect adoption of this Statement
to
have a material impact on our financial condition or results of
operations.
In
December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 (revised 2004), “Share-Based
Payment.” This Statement replaces FASB Statement No. 123 and supersedes
APB Opinion No. 25. Statement No. 123(R) will require the fair value of
all stock option awards issued to employees to be recorded as an expense over
the related vesting period. The Statement also requires the recognition of
compensation expense for the fair value of any unvested stock option awards
outstanding at the date of adoption. See Note 1 of the Notes to the
Consolidated Financial Statements, “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies”,
for the pro-forma effect on our net income and earnings per share of applying
SFAS No. 123(R). The Securities and Exchange Commission has ruled that FAS
123(R) is now effective for public companies for annual periods that began
after
June 15, 2005. Accordingly, we will adopt FAS 123(R) in the first quarter of
2006.
In
May 2005, The Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of Financial
Accounting Standard No. 154, “Accounting Changes and Error Corrections.” The
Statement applies to all voluntary changes in accounting principle and to
changes required by an accounting pronouncement that do not include explicit
transition provisions. SFAS No. 154 requires that changes in accounting
principle be retroactively applied, instead of including the cumulative effect
in the income statement. The correction of an error will continue to require
financial statement restatement. A change in accounting estimate will continue
to be accounted for in the period of change and in subsequent periods, if
necessary. SFAS No. 154 is effective for fiscal years beginning
after
December
31, 2005.
We do not expect the adoption of this Statement to have a material impact on
our
financial condition or results of operations.
Item
7A. Quantitative
and
Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risks
Our
obligation
under the revolving credit facility bears interest at a variable rate;
therefore, changes in prevailing interest rates impact our borrowing costs.
A
one-percentage point fluctuation in market interest rates would not have had
a
material impact on earnings in 2005. None of our foreign sales or purchases
are
denominated in foreign currency and we do not have any foreign currency hedging
transactions. While our foreign purchases are denominated in U.S. dollars,
a
relative decline in the value of the U.S. dollar could result in an increase
in
the cost of our component parts and finished items obtained from offshore
sourcing and reduce our earnings, unless we are able to increase our prices
for
these items to reflect any such increased cost.
Item
8. Financial
Statements and Supplementary Data
The
consolidated
financial statements and schedule listed in items 15(a)(1) and (a)(2) hereof
are
incorporated herein by reference and are filed as part of this
report.
Item
9. Changes
in and
Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial
Disclosure
None.
Item
9A. Controls
and
Procedures
Conclusion
Regarding the Effectiveness of Disclosure Controls and
Procedures
Under
the
supervision and with the participation of our management, including our
principal executive officer and principal financial officer, we conducted an
evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures, as such term is defined
under Rule 13a-15(e) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as
amended (the Exchange Act). Based on this evaluation, our principal executive
officer and our principal financial officer concluded that our disclosure
controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered
by
this annual report.
Management’s
Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Our
management is
responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over
financial reporting, as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f).
Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including
our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, we conducted
an
evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting
based on the framework in Internal
Control-Integrated Framework
issued by the
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on
our
evaluation under the framework in Internal
Control - Integrated Framework,
our management
concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective
as of
December 31, 2005.
Our
management’s
assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting
as of December 31, 2005 has been audited by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an
independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report which
is included herein.
Changes
in
Internal Controls over Financial Reporting
There
were no
changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during
the fourth quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely
to
materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
Item
9B. Other
Information
None.
PART
III
Item
10. Directors
and
Executive Officers
Information
related
to our directors is set forth under the caption “Election of Directors” of our
proxy statement (the “2006 Proxy Statement”) for our annual meeting of
shareholders scheduled for April 19, 2006. Such information is incorporated
herein by reference.
Information
relating to compliance with section 16(a) of the Exchange Act is set forth
under
the caption “Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance” of our
2006 Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference.
Information
relating to the Board of Directors determinations concerning whether a member
of
the Audit Committee of the Board is a “financial expert” as that term is defined
under Item 401(h) of Regulation S-K is set forth under the caption “Board and
Board Committee Information” of our 2006 Proxy Statement and is incorporated
herein by reference.
Information
concerning our executive officers is included in Part I of this report under
the
caption “Executive Officers of the Company.”
We
have adopted a code of ethics that applies to our associates, including the
principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting
officer or controller, or person performing similar functions. Our code of
ethics is posted on our website at stanleyfurniture.com.
Item
11. Executive
Compensation
Information
relating to our executive compensation is set forth under the caption
“Compensation of Executive Officers” of our 2006 Proxy Statement. Such
information is incorporated herein by reference.
Item
12. Security
Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder
Matters
Our
information
relating to this item is set forth under the caption “Security Ownership of
Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters” of our
2006 Proxy Statement. Such information is incorporated herein by
reference.
Item
13. Certain
Relationships and Related Transactions
Our
information
relating to this item is set forth under the caption “Compensation of Executive
Officers - Employment Agreements and Related Transactions” of our 2006 Proxy
Statement. Such information is incorporated herein by reference.
Item
14. Principal
Accounting Fees and Services
Our
information
relating to this item is set forth under the caption “Independent Registered
Public Accountants” of our 2006 Proxy Statement. Such information is
incorporated herein by reference.
PART
IV
Item
15. Exhibits
and
Financial Statement Schedule
(a) Documents
filed as
a part of this Report:
(1)
|
The
following consolidated financial statements are included in this
report on
Form 10-K:
|
Report
of
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
|
|
Consolidated
Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2005 and 2004
|
|
Consolidated
Statements of Income for each of the three years in the period ended
December 31, 2005
|
|
Consolidated
Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity for each of the three years
in the period ended December 31, 2005
|
|
Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flow for each of the three years in the period
ended
December 31, 2005
|
|
Notes
to
Consolidated Financial Statements
|
|
(2)
|
Financial
Statement Schedule:
|
Schedule
II -
Valuation and Qualifying Accounts for each of the three years in
the
period ended December 31, 2005
|
|
(b)
|
Exhibits:
|
3.1
|
The
Restated
Certificate of Incorporation of the Registrant (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 3.1 to the Registrant’s Form 10-Q (Commission File No. 0-14938)
for the quarter ended July 2, 2005).
|
3.2
|
By-laws
of
the Registrant as amended (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3
to the
Registrant’s Form 10-Q (Commission File No. 0-14938) for the quarter ended
September 27, 2003).
|
4.1
|
The
Certificate of Incorporation and By-laws of the Registrant as currently
in
effect (incorporated by reference to Exhibits 3.1 and 3.2
hereto).
|
4.2
|
Note
Purchase
and Private Shelf Agreement, dated as of June 29, 1995, among the
Registrant, The Prudential Insurance Company of America and the affiliates
of Prudential who become Purchasers as defined therein (incorporated
by
reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrant’s Form 8-K (Commission File No.
0-14938) filed December 2, 1997).
|
4.3
|
Letter
Amendment, dated October 14, 1996, to Note Agreements, dated February
15,
1994 and June 29, 1995, between the Registrant and The Prudential
Insurance Company of America (incorporated by reference to Exhibit
4.1 to
the Registrant’s Form 10-Q (Commission File No. 0-14938) for the quarter
ended September 29, 1996).
|
4.4
|
Letter
Amendment, dated June 16, 1997, to Note Agreements, dated February
15,
1994 and June 29, 1995, between the Registrant and The Prudential
Insurance Company of America (incorporated by reference to Exhibit4.1
to
the Registrant’s Statement on Form 8-K (Commission File No. 0-14938) filed
July 9, 1997).
|
4.5
|
Amendment,
dated as of May 10, 1999, to Note Agreements, dated February 15,
1994 and
June 29, 1995, between the Registrant and The Prudential Insurance
Company
of America (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrant’s
Form 10-Q (Commission File No. 0-14938) for the quarter ended June
26,
1999).
|
4.6
|
Private
Shelf
Agreement dated as of September 8, 1999, as amended as of April 26,
2001,
among the Registrant, The Prudential Insurance Company of America
and the
affiliates of Prudential who became purchasers as defined therein
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrant’s Form 10-Q
(Commission File No 0-14938) for the quarter ended June 30,
2001).
|
10.1
|
Employment
Agreement made as of January 1, 1991 between Albert L. Prillaman
and us
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Form 10-K
(Commission File No. 0-14938) for the year ended December 31,
1991).(2)
|
10.2
|
Supplemental
Retirement Plan of Stanley Furniture Company, Inc., as restated effective
January 1, 1993 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 to the
Registrant’s Form 10-K (Commission File No. 0-14938) for the year ended
December 31, 1993).(2)
|
10.3
|
First
Amendment to Supplemental Retirement Plan of Stanley Furniture Company,
Inc., effective December 31, 1995, adopted December 15, 1995 (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to the Registrant’s Form 10-K (Commission
File No. 0-14938) for the year ended December 31,
1995).(2)
|
10.4
|
Stanley
Interiors Corporation Deferred Compensation Capital Enhancement Plan,
effective January 1, 1986, as amended and restated effective August
1,
1987 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.12 to the Registrant’s
Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Commission File No. 0-14938),
No.
33-7300).(2)
|
10.5
|
1994
Stock
Option Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.18 to the
Registrant’s Form 10-K (Commission File No. 0-14938) for the year ended
December 31, 1994).(2)
|
10.6
|
Employment
Agreement dated as of June 1, 1996, between Douglas I. Payne and
the
Registrant (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s
Form 10-Q (Commission File No. 0-14938) for the quarter ended June
30,
1996).(2)
|
10.7
|
Amendment
No.
1, dated as of October 1, 1996, to the Employment Agreement, dated
as of
January 1, 1991, between the Registrant and Albert L. Prillaman
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Registrant’s Form 10-Q
(Commission File No. 0-14938) for the quarter ended September 29,
1996).(2)
|
10.8
|
2000
Incentive Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit
A to the
Registrant’s Proxy Statement (Commission File No. 0-14938) for the special
meeting of stockholders held on August 24, 2000).(2)
|
10.9
|
Amendment
No.
1 to The Stanley Furniture Company, Inc. 1994 Stock Option Plan dated
as
of July 1, 2000 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the
Registrant’s Form 10-Q (Commission File No. 0-14938) for the quarter ended
September 30, 2000).(2)
|
10.10
|
Employment
Agreement made as of April 9, 2001 between Jeffrey R. Scheffer and
the
Registrant (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s
Form 10-Q (Commission File No. 0-14938) for the quarter ended June
30,
2001).(2)
|
10.11
|
Option
Agreement, dated April 30, 2001, between the Registrant and Jeffrey
R.
Scheffer (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s
Form 10-Q (Commission File No. 0-14938) for the quarter ended September
29, 2001).(2)
|
10.12
|
Agreement,
dated April 25, 2002, between Stanley Furniture Company, Inc. and
Albert
L. Prillaman (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.2 to the
Registrant’s Form 8-K (Commission File No. 0-14938) filed on April 25,
2002).(2)
|
(2)
|
Management
contract or compensatory
plan
|
10.13
|
Second
Amendment to Supplemental Retirement Plan of Stanley Furniture Company,
Inc. effective January 1, 2002 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.33
to the Registrant’s Form 10-K (Commission File No. 0-14938) for the year
ended December 31, 2002).(2)
|
10.14
|
Second
Amendment, dated March 1, 2003, to the Employment Agreement, dated
January
1, 1991, between the Registrant and Albert L. Prillaman (incorporated
by
reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Form 10-Q (Commission File
No. 0-14938) for the quarter ended March 29, 2003).(2)
|
10.15
|
First
Amendment, dated March 1, 2003, to the Employment Agreement, dated
April
9, 2001, between the Registrant and Jeffrey R. Scheffer (incorporated
by
reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant’s Form 10-Q (Commission File
No. 0-14938) for the quarter ended March 29, 2003).(2)
|
10.16
|
Credit
Agreement, dated August 29, 2003, between the Registrant and SouthTrust
Bank (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Form
10-Q (Commission File No. 0-14938) for the quarter ended September
27,
2003).
|
10.17
|
First
amendment, dated April 23, 2004, to the revolving credit facility
dated
August 29, 2003, between the registrant and SouthTrust Bank (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Form 10-Q (Commission
File No. 0-14938) for the quarter ended June 26, 2004).
|
10.18
|
2005
Incentive Compensation Award, dated as of December 15, 2004, from
the
Registrant to Jeffrey R. Scheffer (incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.21 to the Registrant’s Form 10-K (Commission File No. 0-14938) for the
year ended December 31, 2004).(2)
|
10.19
|
2005
Incentive Compensation Award, dated as of December 15, 2004, from
the
Registrant to Douglas I. Payne (incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.22
to the Registrant’s Form 10-K (Commission File No. 0-14938) for the year
ended December 31, 2004). (2)
|
10.20
|
Form
of Stock
Option Award under 2000 Incentive Plan (ISO) (incorporated by reference
to
Exhibit 10.23 to the Registrant’s Form 10-K (Commission File No. 0-14938)
for the year ended December 31, 2004). (2)
|
10.21
|
Form
of Stock
Option Award under 2000 Incentive Plan (ISO/NSO) (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.24 to the Registrant’s Form 10-K (Commission File
No. 0-14938) for the year ended December 31, 2004). (2)
|
10.22
|
Form
of Stock
Option Award under 2000 Incentive Plan (Directors) (incorporated
by
reference to Exhibit 10.25 to the Registrant’s Form 10-K (Commission File
No. 0-14938) for the year ended December 31, 2004). (2)
|
10.23
|
Second
Amendment dated June 15, 2005, to the revolving credit facility dated
August 29, 2003, between the Registrant and Wachovia Bank (incorporated
by
reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Form 8-K (Commission File
No. 0-14938) filed on June 16, 2005).
|
10.24
|
Third
Amendment, dated as of April 26, 2005, to the Employment Agreement
between
the Registrant and Albert L. Prillaman (incorporated by reference
to
Exhibit 10.01 to the Registrant’s Form 8-K (Commission File No. 0-14938)
filed May 2, 2005). (2)
|
10.25
|
Non-Competition
Agreement, dated as of December 14, 2005, between the Registrant
and
Albert L. Prillaman (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to
the
Registrant’s Form 8-K (Commission File No. 0-14938) filed on December 19,
2005). (2)
|
(2)
|
Management
contract or compensatory plan
|
21
|
List
of
Subsidiaries(1)
|
23
|
Consent
of
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP(1)
|
31.1
|
Certification
by Jeffrey R. Scheffer, our Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to
18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act
of 2002.(1)
|
31.2
|
Certification
by Douglas I. Payne, our Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to 18
U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act
of 2002.(1)
|
32.1
|
Certification
by Jeffrey R. Scheffer, our Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to
18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act
of 2002.(1)
|
32.2
|
Certification
by Douglas I. Payne, our Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to 18
U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act
of 2002.(1)
|
(1)
|
Filed
Herewith
|
SIGNATURES
Pursuant
to the
requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
the
Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on our behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
STANLEY
FURNITURE COMPANY, INC.
|
||
February
3,
2006
|
By: /s/Jeffrey
R.
Scheffer
|
|
Jeffrey
R.
Scheffer
|
||
Chairman
|
||
President
and
Chief Executive Officer
|
Pursuant
to the
requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed
below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities
and on the dates indicated.
Signature
|
Title
|
Date
|
||
/s/Jeffrey
R. Scheffer
(Jeffrey
R.
Scheffer)
|
Chairman
and
President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal
Executive Officer)
|
February
3,
2006
|
||
/s/Douglas
I. Payne
(Douglas
I.
Payne)
|
Executive
Vice President - Finance and
Administration and Secretary
(Principal Financial and
Accounting Officer)
|
February
3,
2006
|
||
/s/Robert
G. Culp, III
(Robert
G.
Culp, III)
|
Director
|
February
3,
2006
|
||
/s/Michael
P. Haley
(Michael
P.
Haley)
|
Director
|
February
3,
2006
|
||
/s/Thomas
L. Millner
(Thomas
L.
Millner)
|
Director
|
February
3,
2006
|
||
/s/T.
Scott McIlhenny, Jr.
(T.
Scott
McIlhenny, Jr.)
|
Director
|
February
3,
2006
|
||
/s/Albert
L. Prillaman
(Albert
L.
Prillaman)
|
Director
|
February
3,
2006
|
STANLEY
FURNITURE
COMPANY, INC.
ANNUAL
REPORT ON
FORM 10-K
FOR
THE YEAR ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 2005
INDEX
TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Consolidated
Financial Statements
|
Page
|
Report
of
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
|
F2
|
Consolidated
Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2005 and 2004
|
F4
|
Consolidated
Statements of Income for each of the three years in the
period
|
|
ended
December 31, 2005
|
F5
|
Consolidated
Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity for each of
the
|
|
three
years
in the period ended December 31, 2005
|
F6
|
Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows for each of the three years in the
|
|
period
ended
December 31, 2005
|
F7
|
Notes
to
Consolidated Financial Statements
|
F8
|
Financial
Statement Schedule
|
|
Schedule
II -
Valuation and Qualifying Accounts for each of the three
|
|
years
in the
period ended December 31, 2005
|
S1
|
Report
of
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To
the Board of Directors and Stockholders of Stanley Furniture Company,
Inc:
We
have completed integrated audits of Stanley Furniture Company, Inc.’s 2005 and
2004 consolidated financial statements and of its internal control over
financial reporting as of December 31, 2005 and an audit of its 2003
consolidated financial statements in accordance with the standards of the Public
Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Our opinions on Stanley
Furniture Company Inc.’s 2005, 2004 and 2003 consolidated financial statements
and on its internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005,
based on our audits, are presented below.
Consolidated
financial statements and financial statement schedule
In
our opinion, the consolidated financial statements listed in the accompanying
index present fairly,
in all
material respects, the financial position of Stanley Furniture Company, Inc.
and
its subsidiaries at December 31, 2005 and 2004, and the results of their
operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended
December 31, 2005 in
conformity with
accounting principles generally
accepted in the
United States of America. In addition, in our opinion,
the
financial statement schedule listed in the accompanying index presents
fairly, in
all material respects, the information set forth therein when read in
conjunction with the related consolidated financial statements. These financial
statements and financial statement schedule are the responsibility of the
Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express
an opinion
on these financial statements and financial statement schedule based
on
our
audits. We conducted our audits of these statements in accordance with the
standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).
Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable
assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit of financial statements includes examining, on a test
basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial
statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates
made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our
opinion.
Internal
control
over financial reporting
Also,
in our
opinion, management’s assessment, included in Management’s Report on Internal
Control Over Financial Reporting appearing under Item 9A, that the Company
maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December
31, 2005 based
on criteria
established in Internal
Control - Integrated Framework issued
by the
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO), is
fairly stated, in all material respects, based on those criteria. Furthermore,
in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective
internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005, based on
criteria established in Internal
Control - Integrated Framework
issued by the
COSO. The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal
control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness
of
internal control over financial reporting. Our responsibility is to express
opinions on management’s assessment and on the effectiveness of the
Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We
conducted our audit of internal control over financial reporting in accordance
with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United
States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial
reporting was maintained in all material respects. An audit of internal control
over financial reporting includes obtaining an understanding of internal control
over financial reporting, evaluating management’s assessment, testing and
evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control, and
performing such other procedures as we consider necessary in the circumstances.
We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinions.
A
company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting
and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance
with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over
financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain
to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly
reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company;
(ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as
necessary to permit preparation of financial statements
in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts
and
expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with
authorizations of management and directors of the company; and
(iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection
of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that
could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because
of its
inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent
or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness
to
future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate
because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the
policies or procedures may deteriorate.
PricewaterhouseCoopers
LLP
Richmond,
Virginia
January
30,
2006
STANLEY
FURNITURE COMPANY, INC.
CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEETS
(in
thousands,
except share data)
|
December
31, 2005
|
||||||
2005
|
2004
|
||||||
ASSETS
|
|||||||
Current
assets:
|
|||||||
Cash
|
$
|
12,556
|
$
|
7,632
|
|||
Accounts
receivable, less allowances of $1,566 and $1,961
|
36,957
|
36,036
|
|||||
Inventories:
|
|||||||
Finished
goods
|
52,609
|
52,646
|
|||||
Work-in-process
|
7,609
|
8,449
|
|||||
Raw
materials
|
9,743
|
12,563
|
|||||
Total
inventories
|
69,961
|
73,658
|
|||||
Prepaid
expenses and other current assets
|
1,435
|
1,585
|
|||||
Deferred
income taxes
|
2,462
|
2,414
|
|||||
Total
current
assets
|
123,371
|
121,325
|
|||||
Property,
plant and equipment, net
|
50,744
|
51,342
|
|||||
Goodwill
|
9,072
|
9,072
|
|||||
Other
assets
|
7,301
|
7,149
|
|||||
Total
assets
|
$
|
190,488
|
$
|
188,888
|
|||
LIABILITIES
|
|||||||
Current
liabilities:
|
|||||||
Current
maturities of long-term debt
|
$
|
2,857
|
$
|
4,257
|
|||
Accounts
payable
|
16,405
|
16,056
|
|||||
Accrued
salaries, wages and benefits
|
11,144
|
10,573
|
|||||
Other
accrued
expenses
|
1,765
|
1,872
|
|||||
Total
current
liabilities
|
32,171
|
32,758
|
|||||
Long-term
debt, exclusive of current maturities
|
8,571
|
11,428
|
|||||
Deferred
income taxes
|
10,164
|
10,742
|
|||||
Other
long-term liabilities
|
6,833
|
6,695
|
|||||
Total
liabilities
|
57,739
|
61,623
|
|||||
Commitments
and Contingencies
|
|||||||
STOCKHOLDERS’
EQUITY
|
|||||||
Common
stock,
$.02 par value, 25,000,000 shares authorized,
|
|||||||
12,252,000
and 12,830,004 shares issued and outstanding
|
245
|
257
|
|||||
Capital
in
excess of par value
|
10,207
|
||||||
Retained
earnings
|
132,682
|
116,952
|
|||||
Accumulated
other comprehensive loss
|
(178
|
)
|
(151
|
)
|
|||
Total
stockholders’ equity
|
132,749
|
127,265
|
|||||
Total
liabilities and stockholders’ equity
|
$
|
190,488
|
$
|
188,888
|
The
accompanying
notes are an integral part
of
the consolidated
financial statements.
STANLEY
FURNITURE COMPANY, INC.
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(in
thousands,
except per share data)
For
the Years
Ended
|
||||||||||
December
31,
|
||||||||||
2005
|
2004
|
2003
|
||||||||
Net
sales
|
$
|
333,646
|
$
|
305,815
|
$
|
265,263
|
||||
Cost
of
sales
|
251,937
|
230,174
|
203,410
|
|||||||
Gross
profit
|
81,709
|
75,641
|
61,853
|
|||||||
Selling,
general and administrative expenses
|
44,267
|
40,953
|
35,637
|
|||||||
Operating
Income
|
37,442
|
34,688
|
26,216
|
|||||||
Other
income,
net
|
288
|
188
|
203
|
|||||||
Interest
income
|
358
|
43
|
48
|
|||||||
Interest
expense
|
2,183
|
2,386
|
2,796
|
|||||||
Income
before
income taxes
|
35,905
|
32,533
|
23,671
|
|||||||
Income
taxes
|
12,674
|
11,744
|
8,521
|
|||||||
Net
income
|
$
|
23,231
|
$
|
20,789
|
$
|
15,150
|
||||
Earnings
per
share:
|
||||||||||
Basic
|
$
|
1.82
|
$
|
1.65
|
$
|
1.20
|
||||
Diluted
|
$
|
1.77
|
$
|
1.59
|
$
|
1.17
|
||||
Weighted
average shares outstanding:
|
||||||||||
Basic
|
12,766
|
12,574
|
12,651
|
|||||||
Diluted
|
13,154
|
13,099
|
12,923
|
|||||||
Cash
dividends declared and paid
|
||||||||||
per
common
share
|
$
|
.24
|
$
|
.20
|
$
|
.10
|
The
accompanying
notes are an integral part
of
the consolidated
financial statements.
STANLEY
FURNITURE COMPANY, INC.
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
For
each of the
three years in the period ended December 31, 2005
(in
thousands,
except per share data)
Accumulated
|
|||||||||||||
Capital
in
|
Stock
|
Other
|
|||||||||||
Common
Stock
|
Excess
of
|
Option
|
Retained
|
Comprehensive
|
|||||||||
Shares
|
Amount
|
Par
Value
|
Loans
|
Earnings
|
Loss
|
Total
|
|||||||
Balance
at January 1, 2003
|
13,138
|
$263
|
$14,641
|
$(16)
|
$
84,799
|
$
99,687
|
|||||||
Net
income
|
15,150
|
15,150
|
|||||||||||
Minimum
pension liability, net of
|
|||||||||||||
deferred
income tax benefit of
$40
|
$ (65)
|
(65)
|
|||||||||||
Comprehensive
income
|
15,085
|
||||||||||||
Purchase
and retirement of stock
|
(1,132)
|
(22)
|
(14,758)
|
(8)
|
(14,788)
|
||||||||
Exercise
of stock options
|
396
|
8
|
2,341
|
2,349
|
|||||||||
Tax
benefit on exercise of stock options
|
1,475
|
1,475
|
|||||||||||
Stock
option loan payments
|
11
|
11
|
|||||||||||
Dividends
paid, $0.10 per share
|
(1,261)
|
(1,261)
|
|||||||||||
Balance
at December 31, 2003
|
12,402
|
249
|
3,699
|
(5)
|
98,680
|
(65)
|
102,558
|
||||||
Net
Income
|
20,789
|
20,789
|
|||||||||||
Minimum
pension liability, net of
|
|||||||||||||
deferred
income tax benefit of
$53
|
(86)
|
(86)
|
|||||||||||
Comprehensive
income
|
20,703
|
||||||||||||
Exercise
of stock options
|
428
|
8
|
5,030
|
5,038
|
|||||||||
Tax
benefit on exercise of stock options
|
1,478
|
1,478
|
|||||||||||
Stock
option loan payments
|
5
|
5
|
|||||||||||
Dividends
paid, $0.20 per share
|
(2,517)
|
(2,517)
|
|||||||||||
Balance
at December 31, 2004
|
12,830
|
257
|
10,207
|
116,952
|
(151)
|
127,265
|
|||||||
Net
Income
|
23,231
|
23,231
|
|||||||||||
Minimum
pension liability, net of
|
|||||||||||||
deferred
income tax
benefit of $17
|
(27)
|
(27)
|
|||||||||||
Comprehensive
income
|
23,204
|
||||||||||||
Exercise
of stock options
|
469
|
9
|
6,353
|
6,362
|
|||||||||
Stock
awards
|
10
|
244
|
244
|
||||||||||
Tax
benefit on exercise of stock options
|
1,748
|
1,748
|
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Purchase
and retirement of stock
|
(1,057)
|
(21)
|
(18,552)
|
(4,420)
|
(22,993)
|
||||||||
Dividends
paid, $0.24 per share
|
(3,081)
|
(3,081)
|
|||||||||||
Balance
at December 31, 2005
|
12,252
|
$245
|
$132,682
|
$(178)
|
$132,749
|
The
accompanying
notes are an integral part
of
the consolidated
financial statements.
STANLEY
FURNITURE COMPANY, INC
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in
thousands)
For the Years Ended
|
||||||||||
December
31,
|
||||||||||
2005
|
2004
|
2003
|
||||||||
Cash
flows
from operating activities:
|
||||||||||
Cash
received
from customers
|
$
|
333,233
|
$
|
300,429
|
$
|
263,211
|
||||
Cash
paid to
suppliers and employees
|
(287,559
|
)
|
(278,509
|
)
|
(236,334
|
)
|
||||
Interest
paid, net
|
(1,792
|
)
|
(2,387
|
)
|
(2,793
|
)
|
||||
Income
taxes
paid
|
(11,080
|
)
|
(9,061
|
)
|
(9,740
|
)
|
||||
Net
cash
provided by operating activities
|
32,802
|
10,472
|
14,344
|
|||||||
Cash
flows
from investing activities:
|
||||||||||
Capital
expenditures
|
(4,986
|
)
|
(1,718
|
)
|
(1,243
|
)
|
||||
Other,
net
|
(33
|
)
|
(135
|
)
|
(104
|
)
|
||||
Net
cash used
by investing activities
|
(5,019
|
)
|
(1,853
|
)
|
(1,347
|
)
|
||||
Cash
flows
from financing activities:
|
||||||||||
Purchase
and
retirement of common stock
|
(22,993
|
)
|
(14,788
|
)
|
||||||
Repayment
of
senior notes
|
(4,257
|
)
|
(7,015
|
)
|
(6,914
|
)
|
||||
Dividends
paid
|
(3,081
|
)
|
(2,517
|
)
|
(1,261
|
)
|
||||
Proceeds
from
exercise of stock options
|
6,362
|
5,043
|
2,360
|
|||||||
Proceeds
from
insurance policy loans
|
1,110
|
993
|
888
|
|||||||
Net
cash used
by financing activities
|
(22,859
|
)
|
(3,496
|
)
|
(19,715
|
)
|
||||
Net
increase
(decrease) in cash
|
4,924
|
5,123
|
(6,718
|
)
|
||||||
Cash
at
beginning of year
|
7,632
|
2,509
|
9,227
|
|||||||
Cash
at end
of year
|
$
|
12,556
|
$
|
7,632
|
$
|
2,509
|
Reconciliation
of
net income to net cash provided by
operating
activities:
Net
income
|
$
|
23,231
|
$
|
20,789
|
$
|
15,150
|
||||
Adjustments
to reconcile net income to net cash
|
||||||||||
provided
by
operating activities:
|
||||||||||
Depreciation
|
5,582
|
5,524
|
5,623
|
|||||||
Amortization
|
88
|
98
|
160
|
|||||||
Deferred
income taxes
|
(609
|
)
|
(1,324
|
)
|
(463
|
)
|
||||
Other,
net
|
2
|
(3
|
)
|
2
|
||||||
Changes
in
assets and liabilities:
|
||||||||||
Accounts
receivable
|
(921
|
)
|
(5,916
|
)
|
(2,288
|
)
|
||||
Inventories
|
3,697
|
(19,020
|
)
|
(480
|
)
|
|||||
Prepaid
expenses and other current assets
|
(1,415
|
)
|
1,586
|
403
|
||||||
Accounts
payable
|
349
|
5,461
|
(2,791
|
)
|
||||||
Accrued
salaries, wages and benefits
|
815
|
1,062
|
(270
|
)
|
||||||
Other
accrued
expenses
|
1,641
|
470
|
(977
|
)
|
||||||
Other
assets
|
248
|
66
|
57
|
|||||||
Other
long-term liabilities
|
94
|
1,679
|
218
|
|||||||
Net
cash provided by
operating activities
|
$
|
32,802
|
$
|
10,472
|
$
|
14,344
|
||||
Supplemental
disclosure of cash flow information:
|
||||||||||
Non-cash
financing activities:
|
||||||||||
Stock
awards
|
$
|
244
|
The
accompanying
notes are an integral part
of
the consolidated
financial statements
STANLEY
FURNITURE COMPANY, INC.
NOTES
TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. Summary
of
Significant Accounting Policies
Organization
and
Basis of Presentation
The
consolidated
financial statements include Stanley Furniture Company, Inc. and our
wholly owned
subsidiaries. All significant inter-company accounts and transactions have
been
eliminated. We are a leading designer and manufacturer of wood furniture
exclusively targeted at the upper-medium price range of the residential
market.
We
operate in one
business segment. Substantially all revenues result from the sale of residential
furniture products in the United States. Substantially all trade accounts
receivable are due from retailers in this market, which consists of a large
number of entities with a broad geographical dispersion.
Revenue
Recognition
Sales
are
recognized when products are shipped to customers. Revenue includes amounts
billed to customers for shipping. Costs to warehouse and prepare goods for
shipping to customers are expensed and recorded in selling, general and
administrative expenses and amounted to $6.6 million, $5.0 million and $3.4
million in 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively.
Inventories
Inventories
are
valued at the lower of cost or market. Cost for all inventories is determined
using the first-in, first-out (FIFO) method.
Property,
Plant
and Equipment
Depreciation
of
property, plant and equipment is computed using the straight-line method based
upon the estimated useful lives. Gains and losses related to dispositions and
retirements are included in income. Maintenance and repairs are charged to
income as incurred; renewals and betterments are capitalized. Assets
are reviewed
for possible impairment when events indicate that the carrying amount of an
asset may not be recoverable. Assumptions and estimates used in the evaluation
of impairment may affect the carrying value of property, plant and equipment,
which could result in impairment charges in future periods. Depreciation policy
reflects judgments on the estimated useful lives of assets.
Capitalized
Software Cost
We
amortize
purchased computer software costs using the straight-line method over the
estimated economic lives of the related products of five years. Unamortized
cost
at December 31, 2005 and 2004 was $191,000 and $241,000, respectively, and
is
included in other assets.
Income
Taxes
Deferred
income
taxes are determined based on the difference between the consolidated financial
statement and income tax bases of assets and liabilities using enacted tax
rates
in effect in the years in which the differences are expected to reverse.
Deferred tax expense represents the change in the deferred tax asset/liability
balance. Income tax credits are reported as a reduction of income tax expense
in
the year in which the credits are generated.
Fair
Value of
Financial Instruments
The
fair value of
our long-term debt is estimated using a discounted cash flow analysis based
on
the incremental borrowing rates currently available to us for loans with similar
terms and maturities. At December 31, 2005, the fair value is not materially
different than our carrying value. The fair value of trade receivables, trade
payables and letters of credit approximate the carrying amount because of the
short maturity of these instruments.
STANLEY
FURNITURE COMPANY, INC.
NOTES
TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
1. Summary
of
Significant Accounting Policies (continued)
Pension
Plans
Our
funding policy
is to contribute to all qualified plans annually an amount equal to the normal
cost and a portion of the unfunded liability, but not to exceed the maximum
amount that can be deducted for federal income tax purposes.
Earnings
per
Common Share
Basic
earnings per
share is computed based on the average number of common shares outstanding.
Diluted earnings per share reflects the increase in average common shares
outstanding that would result from the assumed exercise of outstanding stock
options, calculated using the treasury stock method.
Stock
Options
We
apply Accounting
Principles Board Opinion No. 25 in accounting for stock options and disclose
the
fair value of options granted as permitted by Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 123. No stock-based compensation cost is reflected in net income,
as all options granted under those plans had an exercise price equal to the
market value of the common stock at date of grant and the number of shares
awarded was fixed at the grant date.
The
estimated per
share weighted-average fair value of stock options granted during 2005, 2004
and
2003 was $9.30, $7.56 and $5.73, respectively, on the date of grant. A risk-free
interest rate of 4.36%, 4.0% and 3.9% for 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively,
a
volatility rate of 30% to 50% with an expected life of 5 to 8 years and a
dividend yield of approximately 1%, was assumed in estimating the fair
value.
The
following table
summarizes the pro forma effects assuming compensation cost for such awards
had
been recorded based upon the estimated fair value (in thousands, except per
share data):
2005
|
2004
|
2003
|
||||||||
Net
income as
reported
|
$
|
23,231
|
$
|
20,789
|
$
|
15,150
|
||||
Deduct:
Total
stock-based compensation expense
|
||||||||||
determined
under fair value based method for all
|
||||||||||
awards,
net
of related tax effects
|
628
|
1,801
|
1,618
|
|||||||
Pro
forma net
income
|
$
|
22,603
|
$
|
18,988
|
$
|
13,532
|
||||
Earnings
per
share:
|
||||||||||
Basic
- as
reported
|
$
|
1.82
|
$
|
1.65
|
$
|
1.20
|
||||
Basic
- pro
forma
|
$
|
1.77
|
$
|
1.51
|
$
|
1.07
|
||||
Diluted
- as
reported
|
$
|
1.77
|
$
|
1.59
|
$
|
1.17
|
||||
Diluted
- pro
forma
|
$
|
1.72
|
$
|
1.47
|
$
|
1.06
|
Goodwill
On
January 1, 2002,
we adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 142, (“SFAS 142”),
“Goodwill and Other Tangible Assets”. In accordance with SFAS 142, we
discontinued goodwill amortization and tested goodwill of $9.1 million for
impairment as of December 31, 2005 and 2004 determining that no impairment
loss
was necessary. We will continue to test goodwill for impairment at least
annually.
STANLEY
FURNITURE COMPANY, INC.
NOTES
TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
1. Summary
of
Significant Accounting Policies (continued)
Tariffs
imposed
on wooden bedroom furniture imported from China
Tariff
expense is
based on the most current rates published by the Department of Commerce. These
rates are potentially subject to an administrative review process starting
approximately one year after the publication date. The final amounts will depend
on whether administrative reviews are performed and the outcome of those
reviews, if any, on the vendors we purchase from.
Use
of Estimates
The
preparation of
consolidated financial statements in conformity with generally accepted
accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions
that
affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and
accompanying notes. Changes in such estimates may affect amounts reported in
future periods.
2. Property,
Plant and Equipment
Depreciable
|
||||||||||
lives
|
(in
thousands)
|
|||||||||
(in
years)
|
2005
|
2004
|
||||||||
Land
and
buildings
|
20
to 50
|
$
|
39,894
|
$
|
38,775
|
|||||
Machinery
and
equipment
|
5
to 12
|
77,693
|
74,846
|
|||||||
Office
furniture and equipment
|
3
to 10
|
1,916
|
2,386
|
|||||||
Property,
plant and equipment, at cost
|
119,503
|
116,007
|
||||||||
Less
accumulated depreciation
|
68,759
|
64,665
|
||||||||
Property,
plant and equipment, net
|
$
|
50,744
|
$
|
51,342
|
3. |
Debt
|
(in
thousands)
|
|||||||
2005
|
2004
|
||||||
7.57%
Senior
note due through June 30, 2005
|
$
|
1,400
|
|||||
7.43%
Senior
notes due through November 18, 2007
|
$
|
2,857
|
4,285
|
||||
6.94%
Senior
notes due through May 3, 2011
|
8,571
|
10,000
|
|||||
Total
|
11,428
|
15,685
|
|||||
Less
current
maturities
|
2,857
|
4,257
|
|||||
Long-term
debt, exclusive of current maturities
|
$
|
8,571
|
$
|
11,428
|
At
December 31,
2005, no borrowings were outstanding under a revolving credit facility that
provides for maximum borrowings of $25.0 million and matures in August 2007.
Interest is payable monthly at the reserve adjusted LIBOR plus .50% per annum
(4.9% on December 31, 2005) or, at our option, prime minus 1.0% (6.25% on
December 31, 2005). We utilize letters of credit to collateralize certain
insurance policies and inventory purchases. Outstanding letters of credit at
December 31, 2005 were $3.7 million.
The
above loan
agreements require us to maintain certain financial covenants. Our ability
to
pay dividends with respect to our common stock and to repurchase our common
stock is restricted to $25.0 million plus 50% of our consolidated net earnings,
adjusted for net cash proceeds received by us from the sale of our stock and
the
amount of payments for redemption, purchase or other acquisition of our capital
stock, subsequent to January 1, 1999. At December 31, 2005, these covenants
limit funds available to pay dividends and repurchase our common stock to $28.1
million.
Annual
principal
requirements are $2.9 million in both 2006 and 2007 and $1.4 million in each
2008, 2009 and 2010.
STANLEY
FURNITURE COMPANY, INC.
NOTES
TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
4. Income
Taxes
The
provision for
income taxes consists of (in thousands):
2005
|
2004
|
2003
|
||||||||
Current:
|
||||||||||
Federal
|
$
|
12,198
|
$
|
10,943
|
$
|
8,190
|
||||
State
|
1,101
|
1,005
|
794
|
|||||||
Total
current
|
13,299
|
11,948
|
8,984
|
|||||||
Deferred:
|
||||||||||
Federal
|
(543
|
)
|
(177
|
)
|
(400
|
)
|
||||
State
|
(82
|
)
|
(27
|
)
|
(63
|
)
|
||||
Total
deferred
|
(625
|
)
|
(204
|
)
|
(463
|
)
|
||||
Income
taxes
|
$
|
12,674
|
$
|
11,744
|
$
|
8,521
|
A
reconciliation of
the difference between the federal statutory income tax rate and the effective
income tax rate follows:
2005
|
2004
|
2003
|
||||||||
Federal
statutory rate
|
35.0
|
%
|
35.0
|
%
|
35.0
|
%
|
||||
State
tax,
net of federal benefit
|
2.5
|
2.5
|
2.6
|
|||||||
State
tax
credits and adjustments
|
(.7
|
)
|
(1.0
|
)
|
(1.0
|
)
|
||||
Increase
in
cash surrender value
|
||||||||||
of
life
insurance policies
|
(.9
|
)
|
(.9
|
)
|
(1.0
|
)
|
||||
Deduction
for
qualified domestic
|
||||||||||
production
activities
|
(.5
|
)
|
||||||||
Other,
net
|
(.1
|
)
|
.5
|
.4
|
||||||
Effective
income tax rate
|
35.3
|
%
|
36.1
|
%
|
36.0
|
%
|
The
income tax
effects of temporary differences that comprise deferred tax assets and
liabilities at December 31 follow (in thousands):
2005
|
2004
|
||||||
Current
deferred tax assets (liabilities):
|
|||||||
Accounts
receivable
|
$
|
599
|
$
|
750
|
|||
Employee
benefits
|
1,732
|
1,676
|
|||||
Other
accrued
expenses
|
131
|
(12
|
)
|
||||
Net
current
deferred tax asset
|
$
|
2,462
|
$
|
2,414
|
|||
Noncurrent
deferred tax liabilities:
|
|||||||
Property,
plant and equipment
|
$
|
9,937
|
$
|
10,522
|
|||
Employee
benefits
|
227
|
220
|
|||||
Net
noncurrent deferred tax liability
|
$
|
10,164
|
$
|
10,742
|
5. Stockholders’
Equity
On
April 26, 2005,
the Board of Directors declared a two-for-one stock split effected in the form
of a 100% stock dividend distributed on June 6, 2005. All share and per share
amounts for all periods presented have been adjusted to reflect the stock split.
At the April 26, 2005 stockholders meeting, stockholders approved an amendment
to the Company’s certificate of incorporation increasing the number of
authorized shares of common stock from 10 million to 25 million.
STANLEY
FURNITURE COMPANY, INC.
NOTES
TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED
5. Stockholders’
Equity (continued)
For
the three years
ending December 31, 2005, we have used $37.8 million of cash to purchase 2.2
million shares of our common stock on the open market at an average price of
$17.26. On January 30, 2006, the Board of Directors increased our stock
repurchase authorization by an additional $10.0 million bringing the total
amount authorized to $17.2 million.
In
addition to
common stock, authorized capital includes 1,000,000 shares of “blank check”
preferred stock. None was outstanding during the three years ended December
31,
2005. The Board of Directors is authorized to issue such stock in series and
to
fix the designation, powers, preferences, rights, limitations and restrictions
with respect to any series of such shares. Such “blank check” preferred stock
may rank prior to common stock as to dividend rights, liquidation preferences
or
both, may have full or limited voting rights and may be convertible into shares
of common stock.
Basic
and diluted
earnings per share are calculated using the following share data (in
thousands):
2005
|
2004
|
2003
|
||||||||
Weighted
average shares outstanding
|
||||||||||
for
basic
calculation
|
12,766
|
12,574
|
12,651
|
|||||||
Effect
of
stock options
|
388
|
525
|
272
|
|||||||
Weighted
average shares outstanding
|
||||||||||
For
diluted
calculation
|
13,154
|
13,099
|
12,923
|
6. Stock
Compensation Plans
Our
stock option
plans provide for the granting of stock options and stock awards up to an
aggregate of 5,000,000 shares of common stock to key employees and to our
non-employee directors. The exercise price may not be less than the fair market
value of our common stock on the grant date. Granted options generally vest
20%
annually and have a maximum life of 10 years. At December 31, 2005, 347,276
shares were available for future grants and awards.
Stock
option
activity for the three years ended December 31, 2005 follows:
Number
|
Weighted-Average
|
||||||
of
shares
|
Exercise
Price
|
||||||
Outstanding
at January 1, 2003
|
2,145,512
|
$
|
11.70
|
||||
Lapsed
|
(120,000
|
)
|
13.17
|
||||
Exercised
|
(395,512
|
)
|
5.94
|
||||
Granted
|
8,000
|
10.95
|
|||||
Outstanding
at December 31, 2003
|
1,638,000
|
12.98
|
|||||
Exercised
|
(428,600
|
)
|
11.76
|
||||
Granted
|
8,000
|
19.50
|
|||||
Outstanding
at December 31, 2004
|
1,217,400
|
13.45
|
|||||
Exercised
|
(469,000
|
)
|
13.57
|
||||
Granted
|
106,728
|
24.09
|
|||||
Outstanding
at December 31, 2005
|
855,128
|
$
|
14.71
|
The
average life of
outstanding options at December 31, 2005 is 5.7 years. Stock options exercisable
at December 31, 2005 are 763,928 shares with a weighted-average exercise price
of $13.79 per share.
In
addition, 10,000
shares of common stock with a fair market value of $24.43 was awarded to key
employees in 2005.
STANLEY
FURNITURE COMPANY, INC.
NOTES
TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
7. Employee
Benefits Plans
Defined
Contribution Plan
We
maintain a
defined contribution plan covering substantially all of our employees and make
discretionary matching and profit sharing contributions. The total plan cost,
including employer contributions, was $1.7 million in 2005, $1.7 million in
2004
and $1.5 million in 2003.
Pension
Plans
Benefits
do not
accrue under our pension plans after 1995. The financial status of the plans
at
December 31 follows (in thousands):
2005
|
2004
|
||||||||||||
Stanley
|
Supple-
|
Stanley
|
Supple-
|
||||||||||
Retirement
|
mental
|
Retirement
|
mental
|
||||||||||
Plan
|
Plan
|
Plan
|
Plan
|
||||||||||
Change
in
benefit obligation:
|
|||||||||||||
Beginning
benefit obligation
|
$
|
15,602
|
$
|
2,056
|
$
|
14,571
|
$
|
1,891
|
|||||
Interest
cost
|
828
|
111
|
861
|
112
|
|||||||||
Actuarial
loss
|
709
|
48
|
1,436
|
139
|
|||||||||
Benefits
paid
|
(2,942
|
)
|
(131
|
)
|
(1,266
|
)
|
(86
|
)
|
|||||
Ending
benefit obligation
|
14,197
|
2,084
|
15,602
|
2,056
|
|||||||||
Change
in
plan assets:
|
|||||||||||||
Beginning
fair value of plan assets
|
15,766
|
15,117
|
|||||||||||
Actual
return
on plan assets
|
930
|
1,615
|
|||||||||||
Employer
contributions
|
1,500
|
131
|
300
|
86
|
|||||||||
Benefits
paid
|
(2,942
|
)
|
(131
|
)
|
(1,266
|
)
|
(86
|
)
|
|||||
Ending fair value of plan assets | 15,254 | 15,766 | |||||||||||
Funded
status
|
1,057
|
(2,084
|
)
|
163
|
(2,056
|
)
|
|||||||
Unrecognized
loss
|
5,264
|
288
|
5,895
|
244
|
|||||||||
Net
amount
recognized
|
$
|
6,321
|
$
|
(1,796
|
)
|
$
|
6,058
|
$
|
(1,812
|
)
|
|||
Amount
recognized in the consolidated balance sheet:
|
|||||||||||||
Prepaid
(accrued) benefit cost
|
$
|
6,321
|
$
|
(2,084
|
)
|
$
|
6,058
|
$
|
(2,056
|
)
|
|||
Accumulated
other comprehensive loss
|
288
|
244
|
|||||||||||
Net
amount
recognized
|
$
|
6,321
|
$
|
(1,796
|
)
|
$
|
6,058
|
$
|
(1,812
|
)
|
We
made cash
contributions of $1.5 million in 2005 and $300,000 in 2004 to the Stanley
Retirement Plan. The Plan is fully funded; therefore, no contributions are
required to be deposited in 2006.
STANLEY
FURNITURE COMPANY, INC.
NOTES
TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
7. Employee
Benefits Plans (continued)
We
maintain an
investment policy for the management of the assets of The Stanley Retirement
Plan. The objective of this policy is to build a structured portfolio designed
to achieve the most desirable balance between investment return and asset
protection by investing in equities of high quality companies and in high
quality fixed income securities which are broadly balanced and represent all
market sectors. The investment structure provides the necessary liquidity for
payment of retirement benefits. The target allocation and the actual allocation
for assets of The Stanley Retirement Plan at December 31, 2005 and December
31,
2004, the measurement date, are as follows:
Target
|
Percentage
of
Assets
|
|||||||||
Allocation
|
2005
|
2004
|
||||||||
Equity
|
30
to 90%
|
|
60.3%
|
|
58.3%
|
|
||||
Fixed
income
|
30
to 60%
|
|
30.0
|
26.2
|
||||||
Other
|
3
to 25%
|
|
9.7
|
15.5
|
||||||
Total
|
100.0%
|
|
100.0%
|
|
The
benefit
obligation of the Supplemental Plan, a nonqualified plan, exceeded the accrued
benefit cost at December 31, 2005. The net accrued benefit cost of the
Supplemental Plan includes a minimum pension liability of $288,000 and $244,000
at December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
Components
of
pension cost follow (in thousands):
2005
|
2004
|
2003
|
||||||||
Interest
cost
|
$
|
939
|
$
|
973
|
$
|
1,028
|
||||
Expected
return on plan assets
|
(1,009
|
)
|
(967
|
)
|
(958
|
)
|
||||
Net
amortization and deferral
|
437
|
460
|
573
|
|||||||
Net
cost
|
367
|
466
|
643
|
|||||||
Settlement
expense
|
985
|
372
|
682
|
|||||||
Total
expense
|
$
|
1,352
|
$
|
838
|
$
|
1,325
|
The
assumptions
used to determine the plans’ financial status and pension cost
were:
2005
|
2004
|
2003
|
||||||||
Discount
rate
for funded status
|
5.50%
|
5.50%
|
6.00%
|
|||||||
Discount
rate
for pension cost
|
5.50%
|
6.00%
|
6.50%
|
|||||||
Return
on
assets
|
6.50%
|
6.50%
|
6.50%
|
Estimated
future
benefit payments are $1.2 million in 2006, $1.5 million in 2007, $1.3 million
in
2008, $1.6 million in 2009, $1.3 million in 2010 and a total of $6.5 million
from 2011 through 2015.
STANLEY
FURNITURE COMPANY, INC.
NOTES
TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
7. Employee
Benefits Plans (continued)
Our
pension expense
is developed from actuarial valuations. Interest rates used in these valuations
are key assumptions, including discount rates used in determining the present
value of future benefit payments and expected return on plan assets, which
are
reviewed and updated on an annual basis at the beginning of each year. We are
required to consider current market conditions, including changes in interest
rates, in making assumptions. In establishing our expected return on assets
assumption, we review asset allocation considering plan maturity and develop
return assumptions based on different asset classes adjusting for plan operating
expenses. The return assumptions are established after reviewing historical
returns of broader market indexes, as well as historical performance of the
investments of The Stanley Retirement Plan.
Postretirement
Benefits Other Than Pensions
We
provide health
care benefits to eligible retired employees between the ages of 55 and 65 and
provide life insurance benefits to eligible retired employees from age 55 until
death. The plan’s financial status at December 31, the measurement date, follows
(in thousands):
2005
|
2004
|
||||||
Change
in
benefit obligation:
|
|||||||
Beginning
benefit obligation
|
$
|
3,111
|
$
|
3,233
|
|||
Service
cost
|
88
|
67
|
|||||
Interest
cost
|
183
|
174
|
|||||
Actuarial
(gain) loss
|
160
|
(203
|
)
|
||||
Plan
participants’ contributions
|
159
|
142
|
|||||
Benefits
paid
|
(403
|
)
|
(302
|
)
|
|||
Ending
benefit obligation
|
3,298
|
3,111
|
|||||
Change
in
plan assets:
|
|||||||
Beginning
fair value of plan assets
|
|||||||
Employer
contributions
|
244
|
160
|
|||||
Plan
participants’ contributions
|
159
|
142
|
|||||
Benefits
paid
|
(403
|
)
|
(302
|
)
|
|||
Ending fair value of plan assets | |||||||
Funded
status
|
(3,298
|
)
|
(3,111
|
)
|
|||
Unrecognized
net loss
|
962
|
868
|
|||||
Unrecognized
transition obligation
|
914
|
1,044
|
|||||
Accrued
benefit cost
|
$
|
(1,422
|
)
|
$
|
(1,199
|
)
|
Components
of net
periodic postretirement benefit cost were (in thousands):
2005
|
2004
|
2003
|
||||||||
Service
cost
|
$
|
88
|
$
|
67
|
$
|
58
|
||||
Interest
cost
|
183
|
174
|
187
|
|||||||
Amortization
of transition obligation
|
130
|
130
|
130
|
|||||||
Amortization
of net actuarial loss
|
66
|
40
|
53
|
|||||||
Net
periodic
postretirement benefit cost
|
$
|
467
|
$
|
411
|
$
|
428
|
STANLEY
FURNITURE COMPANY, INC.
NOTES
TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
7. Employee
Benefits Plans (continued)
The
weighted-average discount rates used in determining the actuarial present value
of the projected benefit obligation was 5.5% in 2005 and 2004, and 6.0% in
2003.
Assumed
health care
cost trend rates at December 31:
2005
|
2004
|
2003
|
||||||||
Health
care
cost assumed trend rate for next year
|
9.5%
|
|
10.0%
|
|
8.5%
|
|
||||
Rate
that the
cost trend rate gradually declines to
|
5.5%
|
|
5.5%
|
|
5.0%
|
|
||||
Year
that the
rate reaches the rate it is assumed to
|
||||||||||
remain
at
|
2010
|
2010
|
2011
|
An
increase or
decrease in the assumed health care cost trend rate of one percentage point
in
each future year would affect the accumulated postretirement benefit obligation
at December 31, 2005 by approximately $194,000 and the annual postretirement
benefit cost by approximately $24,000.
Estimated
future
benefit payments are $296,000 in 2006, $284,000 in 2007, $284,000 in 2008,
$288,000 in 2009, 280,000 in 2010 and a total of $1,433,000 from 2011 through
2015.
Since
the
postretirement benefits other than pension do not cover any benefits after
age
65, the Medicare Prescription Drug Act will have no impact on the benefits
provided under this plan.
Deferred
Compensation
We
have a deferred
compensation plan, funded with life insurance policies, which permitted certain
management employees to defer portions of their compensation and earn a fixed
rate of return. No deferrals have been made since 1991. The accrued liabilities
relating to this of $1.7 million at December 31, 2005 and 2004 are included
in
accrued salaries, wages and benefits and other long-term liabilities. The cash
surrender value, net of policy loans, is included in other assets. Policy loan
interest of $1.2 million, $1.0 million and $911,000 was charged to interest
expense in 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively.
8. Commitments
and Contingencies
We
lease warehouse
space, showroom space and certain technology equipment. Rental expenses charged
to operations were $3.5 million, $2.3 million and $1.3 million in 2005, 2004
and
2003, respectively. Future minimum lease payments are approximately as follows:
2006 - $872,000; 2007 - $743,000; 2008 - $560,000 and 2009 -
$427,000.
In
the normal
course of business, we are involved in claims and lawsuits, none of which
currently, in management’s opinion, will have a material adverse affect on our
Consolidated Financial Statements.
STANLEY
FURNITURE COMPANY, INC.
NOTES
TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
9. New
Accounting Standards
In
November 2004,
the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of Financial
Accounting Standard No. 151, “Inventory Costs”. The new Statement amends
Accounting Research Bulletin No. 43, Chapter 4, “Inventory Pricing,” to clarify
the accounting for abnormal amounts of idle facility expense, freight, handling
costs, and wasted material. This Statement requires that those items be
recognized as current-period charges and requires that allocation of fixed
production overheads to the cost of conversion be based on the normal capacity
of the production facilities. This Statement is effective for fiscal years
beginning after June 15, 2005. The adoption of this Statement is not expected
to
have a material impact on our financial condition or results of
operations.
In
December 2004,
the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 123 (revised 2004), “Share-Based Payment.” This
Statement replaces FASB Statement No. 123 and supersedes APB Opinion No.
25. Statement No. 123(R) will require the fair value of all stock option
awards issued to employees to be recorded as an expense over the related vesting
period. The Statement also requires the recognition of compensation
expense for the fair value of any unvested stock option awards outstanding
at
the date of adoption. See Note 1 for the pro-forma effect on our net
income and earnings per share of applying SFAS No. 123(R). The Securities and
Exchange Commission has ruled that FAS 123(R) is now effective for public
companies for annual periods that began after June15, 2005. Accordingly, we
will
adopt FAS 123(R) in the first quarter of 2006.
In
May 2005, The Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of Financial
Accounting Standard No. 154, “Accounting Changes and Error Corrections.” The
Statement applies to all voluntary changes in accounting principle and to
changes required by an accounting pronouncement that do not include explicit
transition provisions. SFAS No. 154 requires that changes in accounting
principle be retroactively applied, instead of including the cumulative effect
in the income statement. The correction of an error will continue to require
financial statement restatement. A change in accounting estimate will continue
to be accounted for in the period of change and in subsequent periods, if
necessary. SFAS No. 154 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December
31, 2005. We do not expect the adoption of this Statement to have a material
impact on our financial condition or results of operations.
10. |
Quarterly
Results of Operations (Unaudited)
|
(in
thousands,
except per share data)
2005
Quarters:
|
First
|
Second
|
Third
|
Fourth
|
|||||||||
Net
Sales
|
$
|
82,950
|
$
|
83,635
|
$
|
85,615
|
$
|
81,446
|
|||||
Gross
profit
|
20,465
|
20,632
|
20,484
|
20,128
|
|||||||||
Net
income
|
5,760
|
5,827
|
5,802
|
5,842
|
|||||||||
Net
income per share:
|
|||||||||||||
Basic
|
$
|
.45
|
$
|
.45
|
$
|
.45
|
$
|
.47
|
|||||
Diluted
|
.43
|
.44
|
.44
|
.46
|
|||||||||
Dividend
paid per share
|
.06
|
.06
|
.06
|
.06
|
|||||||||
2004
Quarters:
|
|||||||||||||
Net
sales
|
$
|
71,520
|
$
|
72,223
|
$
|
78,803
|
$
|
83,269
|
|||||
Gross
profit
|
17,221
|
18,246
|
19,414
|
20,760
|
|||||||||
Net
income
|
4,607
|
5,211
|
5,285
|
5,686
|
|||||||||
Net
income
per share:
|
|||||||||||||
Basic
|
$
|
.37
|
$
|
.42
|
$
|
.42
|
$
|
.45
|
|||||
Diluted
|
.36
|
.40
|
.40
|
.43
|
|||||||||
Dividend
paid
per share
|
.05
|
.05
|
.05
|
.05
|
STANLEY
FURNITURE
COMPANY, INC.
SCHEDULE
II -
VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
For
each of the
Three Years in the Period Ended December 31, 2005
(in
thousands)
Column
A
|
Column
B
|
Column
C
|
Column
D
|
Column
E
|
||||
Charged
|
||||||||
Balance
at
|
(Credited)
|
Balance
|
||||||
Beginning
|
to
Costs
&
|
at
End
of
|
||||||
Descriptions
|
Of
Period
|
Expenses
|
Deductions
|
Period
|
||||
2005
|
||||||||
Doubtful
receivables
|
$1,050
|
$(213)
|
$187(a)
|
$650
|
||||
Discounts,
returns,
|
||||||||
and
allowances
|
911
|
5(b)
|
|
916
|
||||
$1,961
|
$
(208)
|
$187
|
$1,566
|
|||||
2004
|
||||||||
Doubtful
receivables
|
$1,842
|
$(334)
|
$458(a)
|
$1,050
|
||||
Discounts,
returns,
|
||||||||
and
allowances
|
704
|
207(b)
|
|
911
|
||||
$2,546
|
$(127)
|
$458
|
$1,961
|
|||||
2003
|
||||||||
Doubtful
receivables
|
$2,053
|
$(20)
|
$191(a)
|
$1,842
|
||||
Discounts,
returns,
|
||||||||
and
allowances
|
580
|
124(b)
|
|
704
|
||||
$2,633
|
$104
|
$191
|
$
2,546
|
(a)
Uncollectible
receivables written-off, net of recoveries.
(b)
Represents net
increase (decrease) in the reserve.