HIBBETT INC - Quarter Report: 2007 November (Form 10-Q)
UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington,
D.C. 20549
FORM
10-Q
(Mark
One)
[ X ] QUARTERLY
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934
For
the
quarterly period
ended: November
3, 2007
or
[ ] TRANSITION
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934
For
the
transition period from: __________________________ to
__________________________
COMMISSION
FILE
NUMBER: 000-20969
HIBBETT
SPORTS, INC.
(Exact
name of registrant as specified in its charter)
DELAWARE
State
or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization
|
20-8159608
(I.R.S.
Employer Identification No.)
|
451
Industrial Lane, Birmingham, Alabama 35211
(Address
of principal executive offices, including zip code)
205-942-4292
(Registrant’s
telephone number, including area code)
NONE
(Former
name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last
report)
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to
be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required
to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements
for
the past 90 days.
Yes
|
X
|
No
|
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of
“accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange
Act. (Check one):
Large
accelerated filer
|
X
|
Accelerated
filer
|
Non-accelerated
filer
|
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes
|
No
|
X
|
Indicate
the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common
stock, as of the latest practicable date.
Shares
of
common stock, par value $.01 per share, outstanding as of December 6, 2007,
were 30,472,718 shares.
HIBBETT
SPORTS, INC.
|
|||
INDEX
|
|||
Page
|
|||
PART
I. FINANCIAL
INFORMATION
|
|||
Item
1.
|
|||
Unaudited
Condensed Consolidated Balance
Sheets at November 3, 2007 and February 3,
2007
|
1
|
||
Unaudited
Condensed Consolidated Statements of
Operations for the Thirteen and Thirty-Nine Weeks Ended
November 3, 2007 and October 28, 2006
|
2
|
||
Unaudited
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash
Flows for the Thirty-Nine Weeks Ended November 3, 2007 and
October 28, 2006
|
3
|
||
Unaudited
Condensed Consolidated Statements of
Stockholders’ Investment at November 3, 2007 and February 3,
2007
|
4
|
||
Notes
to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements
|
5
|
||
Item
2.
|
Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations.
|
18
|
|
Item
3.
|
23
|
||
Item
4.
|
23
|
||
PART
II. OTHER
INFORMATION
|
|||
Item
1.
|
24
|
||
Item
1A.
|
24
|
||
Item
2.
|
24
|
||
Item
3.
|
25
|
||
Item
4.
|
25
|
||
Item
5.
|
25
|
||
Item
6.
|
25
|
||
26
|
A
WARNING ABOUT FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This
document contains “forward-looking
statements” as that term is used in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act
of 1995. Forward-looking statements address future events,
developments and results. They include statements preceded by,
followed by or including words such as “believe,” “anticipate,” “expect,”
“intend,” “plan,” “target” or “estimate.” For example, our
forward-looking statements include statements regarding:
|
·
|
our
anticipated sales, including comparable store net sales changes,
net sales
growth and earnings;
|
|
·
|
our
growth, including our plans to add, expand or relocate stores and
square
footage growth, our market’s ability to support such growth and the
suitability of our distribution
facilities;
|
|
·
|
the
possible effect of pending legal actions and other
contingencies;
|
|
·
|
our
cash needs, including our ability to fund our future capital expenditures
and working capital requirements;
|
|
·
|
our
ability and plans to renew or increase our revolving credit
facility;
|
|
·
|
our
seasonal sales patterns and assumptions concerning customer buying
behavior;
|
|
·
|
our
ability to renew or replace store leases
satisfactorily;
|
|
·
|
our
estimates and assumptions as they relate to preferable tax and
financial
accounting methods, accruals, inventory valuations, dividends,
carrying
amount and liquidity of financial instruments and fair value of
options
and other stock-based compensation as well as our estimates of
economic
and useful lives of depreciable assets and
leases;
|
|
·
|
our
expectations concerning future stock-based award
types;
|
|
·
|
our
expectations concerning employee option exercise
behavior;
|
|
·
|
the
possible effect of inflation and other economic changes on our
costs and
profitability;
|
|
·
|
our
analyses of trends as related to earnings
performance;
|
|
·
|
our
target market presence and its expected impact on our sales
growth;
|
|
·
|
our
expectations concerning vendor level purchases and related discounts;
and
|
|
·
|
our
estimates and assumptions related to income tax liabilities and
uncertain
tax positions.
|
For
a discussion of the risks,
uncertainties and assumptions that could affect our future events, developments
or results, you should carefully consider the risk factors described from
time
to time in our other documents and reports, including the factors described
under “Risk Factors,” “Business” and “Properties” in our Form 10-K
dated April 4, 2007.
Our
forward-looking statements could be
wrong in light of these and other risks, uncertainties and
assumptions. The future events, developments or results described in
this report could turn out to be materially different. We have no
obligation to publicly update or revise our forward-looking statements after
the
date of this report and you should not expect us to do so.
Investors
should also be aware that
while we do, from time to time, communicate with securities analysts and
others,
we do not, by policy, selectively disclose to them any material non-public
information with any statement or report issued by any analyst regardless
of the
content of the statement or report. We do not, by policy, confirm
forecasts or projections issued by others. Thus, to the extent that
reports issued by securities analysts contain any projections, forecasts
or
opinions, such reports are not our responsibility.
You
should assume that the information
appearing in this report is accurate only as of the date it was
issued. Our business, financial condition, results of operations and
prospects may have changed since that date.
INVESTOR
ACCESS TO COMPANY FILINGS
We
make available free of charge on our
website, www.hibbett.com under the heading “Investor Information,” copies
of our Annual Report on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current
Reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant
to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as well
as all
Forms 4 and 5 filed by our executive officers and directors, as soon as the
filings are made publicly available by the Securities and Exchange Commission
on
its EDGAR database at www.sec.gov. In addition to accessing
copies of our reports online, you may request a copy of our Annual Report
on
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended February 3, 2007, at no charge, by writing
to: Investor Relations, Hibbett Sports, Inc., 451 Industrial Lane,
Birmingham, Alabama 35211.
PART
I. FINANCIAL
INFORMATION
ITEM
1.
|
HIBBETT
SPORTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
(in
thousands, except share and per share information)
November
3,
|
February
3,
|
|||||||
ASSETS
|
2007
|
2007
|
||||||
Current
Assets:
|
||||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
$ |
10,751
|
$ |
30,367
|
||||
Short-term
investments
|
292
|
-
|
||||||
Trade
receivables, net
|
1,776
|
1,585
|
||||||
Accounts
receivable, other
|
2,824
|
3,066
|
||||||
Inventories
|
148,513
|
125,240
|
||||||
Prepaid
expenses and other
|
7,037
|
5,024
|
||||||
Deferred
income taxes, net
|
1,637
|
1,607
|
||||||
Total
current assets
|
172,830
|
166,889
|
||||||
Property
and Equipment:
|
||||||||
Land
and building
|
245
|
245
|
||||||
Equipment
|
39,079
|
32,946
|
||||||
Furniture
and fixtures
|
19,986
|
18,846
|
||||||
Leasehold
improvements
|
55,505
|
50,767
|
||||||
Construction
in progress
|
1,194
|
4,417
|
||||||
116,009
|
107,221
|
|||||||
Less
accumulated depreciation and amortization
|
72,486
|
64,648
|
||||||
Total
property and equipment
|
43,523
|
42,573
|
||||||
Non-current
Assets:
|
||||||||
Deferred
income taxes
|
7,242
|
3,217
|
||||||
Other,
net
|
186
|
174
|
||||||
Total
non-current assets
|
7,428
|
3,391
|
||||||
Total
Assets
|
$ |
223,781
|
$ |
212,853
|
||||
LIABILITIES
AND STOCKHOLDERS' INVESTMENT
|
||||||||
Current
Liabilities:
|
||||||||
Accounts
payable
|
$ |
52,592
|
$ |
42,016
|
||||
Accrued
income taxes
|
-
|
5,338
|
||||||
Accrued
payroll expense
|
3,407
|
6,592
|
||||||
Deferred
rent
|
4,046
|
4,228
|
||||||
Other
accrued expense
|
3,321
|
2,287
|
||||||
Total
current liabilities
|
63,366
|
60,461
|
||||||
Non-current
Liabilities:
|
||||||||
Deferred
rent
|
16,540
|
15,715
|
||||||
Accrued
income taxes
|
6,524
|
-
|
||||||
Other
|
78
|
36
|
||||||
Total
non-current liabilities
|
23,142
|
15,751
|
||||||
Stockholders'
Investment:
|
||||||||
Preferred
stock, $.01 par value 1,000,000 shares authorized, no
|
||||||||
shares
issued
|
-
|
-
|
||||||
Common
stock, $.01 par value, 80,000,000 shares authorized,
|
||||||||
36,152,031
and 36,047,732 shares issued at November 3, 2007
|
||||||||
and
February 3, 2007, respectively
|
361
|
360
|
||||||
Paid-in
capital
|
86,723
|
81,916
|
||||||
Retained
earnings
|
173,950
|
151,697
|
||||||
Treasury
stock at cost; 5,276,713 and 4,306,413 shares repurchased
|
||||||||
at
November 3, 2007 and February 3, 2007, respectively
|
(123,761 | ) | (97,332 | ) | ||||
Total
stockholders' investment
|
137,273
|
136,641
|
||||||
Total
Liabilities and Stockholders' Investment
|
$ |
223,781
|
$ |
212,853
|
||||
See
notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial
statements.
1
HIBBETT
SPORTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
(in
thousands, except share and per share information)
Thirteen
Weeks Ended
|
Thirty-Nine
Weeks Ended
|
|||||||||||||||
November
3,
|
October
28,
|
November
3,
|
October
28,
|
|||||||||||||
2007
|
2006
|
2007
|
2006
|
|||||||||||||
Net
sales
|
$ |
129,628
|
$ |
129,658
|
$ |
377,873
|
$ |
360,935
|
||||||||
Cost
of goods sold, including distribution center
|
||||||||||||||||
and
store occupancy costs
|
87,154
|
86,592
|
252,871
|
241,037
|
||||||||||||
Gross
profit
|
42,474
|
43,066
|
125,002
|
119,898
|
||||||||||||
Store
operating, selling and administrative
|
||||||||||||||||
expenses
|
26,898
|
24,757
|
79,512
|
71,584
|
||||||||||||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
3,023
|
2,697
|
9,038
|
8,152
|
||||||||||||
Operating
income
|
12,553
|
15,612
|
36,452
|
40,162
|
||||||||||||
Interest
income
|
91
|
236
|
551
|
691
|
||||||||||||
Interest
expense
|
(3 | ) | (1 | ) | (53 | ) | (24 | ) | ||||||||
Interest
income, net
|
88
|
235
|
498
|
667
|
||||||||||||
Income
before provision for income taxes
|
12,641
|
15,847
|
36,950
|
40,829
|
||||||||||||
Provision
for income taxes
|
4,826
|
5,921
|
14,227
|
15,360
|
||||||||||||
Net
income
|
$ |
7,815
|
$ |
9,926
|
$ |
22,723
|
$ |
25,469
|
||||||||
Basic
earning per share
|
$ |
0.25
|
$ |
0.31
|
$ |
0.73
|
$ |
0.79
|
||||||||
Diluted
earnings per share
|
$ |
0.25
|
$ |
0.31
|
$ |
0.71
|
$ |
0.78
|
||||||||
Weighted
average shares outstanding:
|
||||||||||||||||
Basic
|
31,074,731
|
31,982,045
|
31,312,106
|
32,221,569
|
||||||||||||
Diluted
|
31,553,636
|
32,440,333
|
31,822,506
|
32,742,486
|
See
notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial
statements.
2
HIBBETT
SPORTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Thirty-Nine
Weeks Ended
|
||||||||
November
3,
|
October
28,
|
|||||||
2007
|
2006
|
|||||||
Cash
Flows From Operating Activities:
|
||||||||
Net
income
|
$ |
22,723
|
$ |
25,469
|
||||
Adjustments
to reconcile net income to net cash provided by
|
||||||||
operating
activities:
|
||||||||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
9,038
|
8,152
|
||||||
Deferred
income tax expense (benefit), net
|
1,854
|
(1,166 | ) | |||||
Excess
tax benefit from stock option exercises
|
(517 | ) | (2,374 | ) | ||||
Loss
on disposal of assets, net
|
170
|
347
|
||||||
Stock-based
compensation expense
|
3,159
|
2,105
|
||||||
Changes
in operating assets and liabilities:
|
||||||||
Trade
receivables, net
|
(191 | ) | (37 | ) | ||||
Accounts
receivable, other
|
242
|
(576 | ) | |||||
Inventories
|
(23,129 | ) | (22,071 | ) | ||||
Prepaid
expenses and other current assets
|
(1,217 | ) | (176 | ) | ||||
Accrued
and refundable income taxes
|
(5,644 | ) |
1,986
|
|||||
Other
non-current assets
|
(12 | ) | (42 | ) | ||||
Accounts
payable
|
10,577
|
(3,268 | ) | |||||
Deferred
rent, non-current
|
824
|
1,110
|
||||||
Accrued
expenses
|
(2,289 | ) |
997
|
|||||
Net
cash provided by operating activities
|
15,588
|
10,456
|
||||||
Cash
Flows From Investing Activities:
|
||||||||
(Purchase)
sale of short-term investments, net
|
(292 | ) |
12,725
|
|||||
Capital
expenditures
|
(10,165 | ) | (10,881 | ) | ||||
Proceeds
from sale of property and equipment
|
9
|
33
|
||||||
Net
cash (used in) provided by financing activities
|
(10,448 | ) |
1,877
|
|||||
Cash
Flows From Financing Activities:
|
||||||||
Cash
used for stock repurchases
|
(26,429 | ) | (30,251 | ) | ||||
Excess
tax benefit from stock option exercises
|
517
|
2,374
|
||||||
Proceeds
from options exercised and purchase of shares
|
||||||||
under
the employee stock purchase plan
|
1,156
|
2,340
|
||||||
Net
cash used in financing activities
|
(24,756 | ) | (25,537 | ) | ||||
Net
Decrease in Cash and Cash Equivalents
|
(19,616 | ) | (13,204 | ) | ||||
Cash
and Cash Equivalents, Beginning of Period
|
30,367
|
25,944
|
||||||
Cash
and Cash Equivalents, End of Period
|
$ |
10,751
|
$ |
12,740
|
||||
Supplemental
Disclosures of Cash Flow Information:
|
||||||||
Cash
paid during the period for:
|
||||||||
Interest
|
$ |
53
|
$ |
24
|
||||
Income
taxes, net of refunds
|
$ |
18,016
|
$ |
14,540
|
||||
Supplemental
Schedule of Non-Cash Financing Activities:
|
||||||||
Deferred
board compensation
|
$ |
25
|
$ |
24
|
||||
Shares
awarded to satisfy deferred board compensation
|
918
|
905
|
See
notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial
statements.
3
HIBBETT
SPORTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
(in
thousands, except share information)
Common
Stock
|
Treasury
Stock
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Number
of Shares
|
Amount
|
Paid-In
Capital
|
Retained
Earnings
|
Number
of Shares
|
Amount
|
Total
Stockholders' Investment
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Balance
- January 28, 2006
|
35,734,752
|
$ |
357
|
$ |
75,166
|
$ |
113,624
|
3,127,700
|
$ | (64,374 | ) | $ |
124,773
|
|||||||||||||
Net
income
|
|
|
|
38,073
|
|
|
38,073
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Issuance
of shares from the employee stock purchase plan and the exercise
of stock
options, net of tax benefit $2,539
|
312,980
|
3
|
5,220
|
|
|
|
5,223
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Adjustment
to income tax benefit from exercises of employee stock
options
|
|
|
(1,307 | ) |
|
|
|
(1,307 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Purchase
of shares under the stock repurchase program
|
|
|
|
|
1,178,713
|
(32,958 | ) | (32,958 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Stock-based
compensation
|
|
|
2,837
|
|
|
|
2,837
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Balance
- February 3, 2007
|
36,047,732
|
360
|
81,916
|
151,697
|
4,306,413
|
(97,332 | ) |
136,641
|
||||||||||||||||||
Net
income
|
22,723
|
22,723
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cumulative
effect of adopting FIN No. 48
|
|
|
|
(553 | ) |
|
|
(553 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Cumulative
effect of change in accounting principle, net
|
|
|
|
83
|
|
|
83
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Issuance
of shares from the employee stock purchase plan and the exercise
of stock
options, net of tax benefit $492
|
104,299
|
1
|
1,648
|
|
|
|
1,649
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Purchase
of shares under the stock repurchase program
|
970,300
|
(26,429 | ) | (26,429 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Stock-based
compensation
|
|
|
3,159
|
|
|
|
3,159
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Balance
- November 3, 2007
|
36,152,031
|
$ |
361
|
$ |
86,723
|
$ |
173,950
|
5,276,713
|
$ | (123,761 | ) | $ |
137,273
|
See
notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial
statements.
4
HIBBETT
SPORTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes
to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
1.
|
Basis
of Presentation and Accounting
Policies
|
The
accompanying unaudited condensed
consolidated financial statements of Hibbett Sports, Inc. and its wholly-owned
subsidiaries have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America for interim financial
information and are presented in accordance with the requirements of Form
10-Q
and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include
all of the information and footnotes required by generally accepted accounting
principles for complete financial statements. These financial
statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial
statements and notes thereto for the fiscal year ended February 3,
2007. In our opinion, the unaudited condensed consolidated financial
statements included herein contain all adjustments (consisting primarily
of
normal recurring adjustments and those listed below under “Accounting Changes)
considered necessary for a fair presentation of our financial position as
of
November 3, 2007 and February 3, 2007 and the results of our operations and
cash
flows for the periods presented.
Accounting
Changes
Change
in Accounting Principle –
Inventories
On
February 4, 2007, the first day of
fiscal 2008, we changed our inventory valuation method. Previously,
inventories were principally valued at the lower of cost or market using
the
retail method. Commencing in fiscal 2008, inventories are principally
valued at the lower of cost or market, using the weighted-average cost
method.
Statement
of Financial Accounting
Standards (SFAS) No. 154 (SFAS No. 154), “Accounting Changes and Error
Corrections – A Replacement of APB Opinion No. 20 and FASB Statement No.
3,” requires a retrospective application of changes in accounting
principles. However the effect of this change in accounting principle
for periods prior to fiscal 2008 is not determinable, as the period-specific
information required to value inventory using the weighted-average cost method
is not available for periods prior to February 4, 2007. This change
was recognized as a net increase of $143,000 to inventory, an increase of
$60,000 to deferred tax liabilities and a cumulative effect to retained earnings
of $83,000. This change in valuation method did not have a material
impact on net income or diluted earnings per share.
We
believe the new accounting method of
weighted-average cost is preferable to the retail method of inventory valuation
because it will produce more accurate inventory amounts reported in the balance
sheet and, in turn, more accurate cost of sales in the income
statement. The new JDA Merchandising System has facilitated our
ability to value our inventory on the weighted-average cost method.
Adoption
of FIN No.
48
On
February 4, 2007, we adopted the
provisions of Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Interpretation
No. 48
(FIN No. 48), “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, an Interpretation
of FASB Statement No. 109.” FIN No. 48 clarifies the accounting
for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an enterprise’s financial
statements in accordance with FASB Statement No. 109, “Accounting for Income
Taxes,” by prescribing the financial statement recognition and measurement
of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax
return. Under FIN No. 48, the financial statement effects of a tax
position should initially be recognized when it is more-likely-than-not,
based
on the technical merits, that the position will be sustained upon
examination. A tax position that meets the more-likely-than-not
recognition threshold should initially and subsequently be measured as the
largest amount of tax benefit that has a greater than 50% likelihood of being
realized upon ultimate settlement with a taxing authority.
As
a result of implementing FIN No. 48,
we increased the liability for unrecognized tax benefits by $3,764,000,
increased deferred tax assets by $3,209,000 and reduced retained earnings
as of
February 4, 2007 by $553,000. Our total liability for unrecognized
tax benefits as of February 4, 2007 amounted to $5,684,000.
We
recognized adjustments to our
liability for prior year unrecognized tax benefits of $184,000 during the
third
quarter of fiscal 2008 and $885,000 during the first nine months of fiscal
2008
which increased our current tax provision and increased our liability
balance. As of November 3, 2007, our total liability for unrecognized
tax benefits amounted to $6,524,000 of which $2,736,000 would affect the
effective tax rate if recognized.
We
expect to file accounting method
changes with the Internal Revenue Service before the end of fiscal 2008 which
will result in a reduction of approximately $2.9 million of our liability
for
prior year unrecognized tax benefits.
We
classify interest and penalties
recognized on the liability for unrecognized tax benefits as income tax
expense. The associated amounts included in our total liability for
unrecognized tax benefits were $768,000 as of November 3, 2007 and $567,000
as
of February 4, 2007.
5
The
U.S. Federal statute of limitations
expired during the third quarter of fiscal 2008 for our fiscal 2004 tax
year. Generally, we are not subject to changes in income taxes by
most state taxing jurisdictions for years prior to fiscal 2002.
Seasonality
and Inflation
Our
business follows a seasonal
pattern, with historical peaks during back-to-school and holiday selling
seasons. The seasonality of our operations may lead to significant
fluctuations in certain asset, liability and income statement accounts between
fiscal year-end and subsequent interim periods. Our quarterly results
of operations may also fluctuate significantly as a result of a variety of
factors, including the timing of new store openings, the amount and timing
of
net sales contributed by new stores, retail calendar shifts, the level of
pre-opening expenses associated with new stores, the relative proportion of
new
stores to mature stores, merchandise mix, the addition and timing of tax
holidays offered within our markets, the relative proportion of stores
represented by each of our three store concepts and demand for apparel and
accessories driven by local interest in sporting events.
Although
our operations are influenced
by general economic conditions, we do not believe that inflation has a material
impact on our results of operations as we are generally able to pass along
inflationary increases in costs to our customers.
Business
We
are an operator of sporting goods
retail stores in small to mid-sized markets predominately in the Sunbelt,
Mid-Atlantic and the lower Midwest regions of the United States. Our
fiscal year ends on the Saturday closest to January 31 of each
year. Our merchandise assortment features a core selection of brand
name merchandise emphasizing team sports equipment, athletic apparel and
footwear and related accessories. We complement this core assortment
with a selection of localized apparel and accessories designed to appeal to
a
wide range of customers within each market.
Principles
of Consolidation
The
consolidated financial statements
of our Company include its accounts and the accounts of all wholly-owned
subsidiaries. All significant intercompany balances and transactions
have been eliminated in consolidation. Occasionally, certain
reclassifications are made to conform previously reported data to the current
presentation. Such reclassifications had no impact on total assets,
net income or stockholders’ investment.
Reportable
Segments
Given
the economic characteristics of
our store formats, the similar nature of products offered for sale, the type
of
customers, the methods of distribution and how our Company is managed, our
operations constitute only one reportable segment.
Revenues
from external customers by
product category are impractical for us to report.
Use
of Estimates in the Preparation of Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements
The
preparation of condensed
consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America requires our management
to
make estimates and assumptions that affect (1) the reported amounts of certain
assets and liabilities and disclosure of certain contingent assets and
liabilities at the date of the condensed consolidated financial statements
and
(2) the reported amounts of certain revenues and expenses during the reporting
period. Actual results could differ from those
estimates.
Vendor
Arrangements
We
enter into arrangements with some of
our vendors that entitle us to a partial refund of the cost of merchandise
purchased during the year or reimbursement of certain costs we incur to
advertise or otherwise promote their product. The volume-based
rebates, supported by a vendor agreement, are estimated throughout the year
and
reduce the cost of inventory and cost of goods sold during the
year. This estimate is regularly monitored and adjusted for current
or anticipated changes in purchase levels and for sales activity.
Cash
and Cash Equivalents
We
consider all short-term, highly
liquid investments with original maturities of 90 days or less, including
commercial paper and money market funds, to be cash
equivalents. Amounts due from third party credit card processors for
the settlement of debit and credit card transactions are included as cash
equivalents as they are generally collected within three business
days. Cash equivalents related to credit and debit card transactions
at November 3, 2007 and February 3, 2007 were $1.8 million and $2.2 million,
respectively.
6
Short-Term
Investments
All
investments with original
maturities of greater than 90 days are accounted for in accordance with SFAS
No.
115, “Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity
Securities.” The Company determines the appropriate
classification at the time of purchase. We held approximately $292,000 of
investments in securities at November 3, 2007. We did not hold any
investments in securities
at February 3, 2007. Our investments in securities primarily
consisted of municipal bonds classified as available-for-sale. Investments
in
these securities are recorded at cost, which approximates fair
value. Despite the long-term nature of their stated contractual
maturities,
we believe there is a ready liquid market for these securities. As a result,
there are no cumulative gross unrealized holding gains (losses) or gross
realized gains (losses) from our securities. All income generated from these
securities is recorded as interest income. We continually evaluate
our short-term investments for other than temporary impairment.
Trade
and Other Accounts Receivable
Trade
accounts receivable consists
primarily of amounts due to us from sales to educational institutions and youth
associations. We do not require collateral, and we maintain an
allowance for potential uncollectible accounts based on an analysis of the
aging
of accounts receivable at the date of the financial statements, historical
losses and existing economic conditions, when relevant. The allowance
for doubtful accounts at November 3, 2007 and February 3, 2007 was $56,000
and
$34,000, respectively.
Other
accounts receivable consisted
primarily of tenant allowances due from landlords and cooperative advertising
due from vendors, all of which are deemed to be collectible.
Inventory
Valuation
Lower
of Cost or
Market: Beginning in fiscal 2008, inventory is valued using the
lower of weighted-average cost or market method. Market is determined
based on estimated net realizable value. We regularly review
inventories to determine if the carrying value exceeds realizable value, and
we
record a reserve to reduce the carrying value to net realizable value as
necessary. As of November 3, 2007, the reserve was $0.8
million. There was no amount reserved as of February 3,
2007. A determination of net realizable value requires significant
judgment and estimates.
Previously,
we valued inventories at
the lower of cost or market using the retail inventory method of accounting,
with cost determined on a first-in, first-out basis and market based on the
lower of replacement cost or estimated realizable value.
Shrink
Reserves: We
accrue for inventory shrinkage based on the historical shrink results of our
physical inventories averaged over three years. These estimates are
compared to actual results as physical inventory counts are performed and
reconciled to the general ledger. Store counts are typically
performed on a cyclical basis and the distribution center’s counts are performed
mid-year and in late December or early January every year.
Inventory
Purchase
Concentration: Our business is dependent to a significant degree
upon close relationships with our vendors. Our largest vendor, Nike,
represented approximately 46.3% and 45.7% of our total purchases for the
thirteen weeks ended November 3, 2007 and October 28, 2006,
respectively. Our second largest vendor represented approximately
10.4% and 10.3% of our total purchases while our third largest vendor
represented approximately 8.9% and 6.3% of our total purchases for the thirteen
weeks ended November 3, 2007 and October 28, 2006, respectively.
For
the thirty-nine weeks ended
November 3, 2007 and October 28, 2006, Nike, our largest vendor, represented
approximately 48.4% and 47.1% of our total purchases,
respectively. Our second largest vendor represented approximately
9.4% and 10.0% of our total purchases while our third largest vendor represented
approximately 6.8% and 4.4% or our total purchases, respectively.
Property
and Equipment
Property
and equipment are recorded at
cost. Depreciation on assets is principally provided using the
straight-line method over their estimated service lives (3 to 7 years for
equipment, 7 years for furniture and fixtures and 39 years for buildings) or,
in
the case of leasehold improvements, the shorter of the initial term of the
underlying leases or the estimated economic lives of the improvements (typically
3 to 10 years).
Construction
in progress is normally
comprised of property and equipment related to unopened stores. At
fiscal year ended February 3, 2007, construction in progress was comprised
mostly of system costs associated with the JDA Merchandising
System.
Maintenance
and repairs are charged to
expense as incurred. The cost and accumulated depreciation of assets
sold, retired or otherwise disposed of are removed from property and equipment
and the related gain or loss is credited or charged to income.
Statement
of Position (SOP) 98-1,
“Accounting for the Costs of Computer Software Developed or Obtained for
Internal Use,” provides guidance on accounting for such
costs. SOP 98-1 requires computer software costs that are incurred in
the preliminary project stage to be expensed as incurred. Once the
capitalization criteria of SOP 98-1 have been met, directly attributable
development costs
7
should
be
capitalized. It also provides that upgrade and maintenance costs
should be expensed. Our treatment of such costs is consistent with
SOP 98-1, with the costs capitalized being amortized over the expected useful
life of the software. For the thirteen weeks and thirty-nine weeks
ended November 3, 2007 there were no costs capitalized under SOP
98-1. For the fiscal year ended February 3, 2007 we capitalized
approximately $120,000 under SOP 98-1 associated with the implementation of
our
new merchandising software.
Self-Insurance
Accrual
We
are self-insured for a significant
portion of our health insurance. Liabilities associated with the
risks that are retained by us are estimated, in part, by considering our
historical claims. The estimated accruals for these liabilities could
be affected if future occurrences and claims differ from our
assumptions. To minimize our potential exposure, we carry stop-loss
insurance which reimburses us for losses over $100,000 per covered person per
year or $2.0 million per year in the aggregate. As of November 3,
2007 and February 3, 2007,
the
accrual for these liabilities was $420,000 and $350,000, respectively, and
was
included in accrued expenses in the condensed consolidated balance
sheets.
We
are also self-insured for our
workers’ compensation and general liability insurance up to an established
deductible with a cumulative stop loss. As of November 3, 2007 and
February 3, 2007, the accrual for these liabilities (which is not discounted)
was $200,000 and was included in accrued expenses in the condensed consolidated
balance sheets.
Deferred
Rent from Landlords
Deferred
rent from landlords primarily
consists of step rent and allowances from landlords related to our leased
properties. Step rent represents the difference between actual operating lease
payments due and straight-line rent expense, which is recorded by the Company
over the term of the lease, including the build-out period. This amount is
recorded as deferred rent in the early years of the lease, when cash payments
are generally lower than straight-line rent expense, and reduced in the later
years of the lease when payments begin to exceed the straight-line expense.
Landlord allowances are generally comprised of amounts received and/or promised
to us by landlords and may be received in the form of cash or free rent. These
allowances are part of the negotiated terms of the lease. We record a receivable
from the landlord and a deferred rent liability when the allowances are earned.
This deferred rent is amortized into income (through lower rent expense) over
the term (including the pre-opening build-out period) of the applicable lease,
and the receivable is reduced as amounts are received from the
landlord.
On
our statements of cash flows, the
current and long-term portions of landlord allowances are included as changes
in
cash flows from operations. The current portion is included as a
change in accrued expenses and the long-term portion is included as a change
in
deferred rent, non-current. The liability for the current portion of
unamortized landlord allowances was $3.6 million and $3.1 million, respectively,
at November 3, 2007 and February 3, 2007. The liability for the
long-term portion of unamortized landlord allowances was $13.4 million and
$12.6
million at November 3, 2007 and February 3, 2007, respectively. The
non-cash portion of landlord allowances received is immaterial.
Revenue
Recognition
We
recognize revenue, including gift
card and layaway sales, in accordance with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (SEC) Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) No. 101, “Revenue
Recognition in Financial Statements,” as amended by SAB No. 104,
“Revenue Recognition.”
Retail
merchandise sales occur on-site
in our retail stores. Customers have the option of paying the full purchase
price of the merchandise upon sale or paying a down payment and placing the
merchandise on layaway. The customer may make further payments in installments,
but the entire purchase price for merchandise placed on layaway must be received
by the Company within 30 days. The down payment and any installments are
recorded by us as short-term deferred revenue until the customer pays the entire
purchase price for the merchandise. We recognize revenue at the time
the customer takes possession of the merchandise. Retail
sales are recorded net of returns and discounts and exclude sales
taxes.
The
cost of coupon sales incentives is
recognized at the time the related revenue is recognized by the Company.
Proceeds received from the issuance of gift cards are initially recorded as
deferred revenue. Revenue is subsequently recognized at the time the
customer redeems the gift cards and takes possession of the
merchandise. Unredeemed gift cards are recorded as a current
liability.
It
is not our policy to take unclaimed
layaway deposits and gift cards into income. As of November 3, 2007
and October 28, 2006 there was no breakage revenue recorded in
income. The deferred revenue liability for layaway deposits and
unredeemed gift cards was $1.6 million and $1.8 million at November 3, 2007
and
February 3, 2007, respectively. Any unrecognized breakage revenue is
immaterial. We escheat unredeemed gift cards.
8
Cost
of Goods Sold
We
include inbound freight charges,
merchandise purchases, store occupancy costs and a portion of our distribution
costs related to our retail business in cost of goods sold. Outbound freight
charges associated with moving merchandise to and between stores are included
in
store operating, selling and administrative expenses.
Store
Opening and Closing Costs
New
store opening costs, including
pre-opening costs, are charged to expense as incurred. Store opening costs
primarily include payroll expenses, training costs and straight-line rent
expenses. All pre-opening costs are included in store operating, selling and
administrative expenses as a part of operating expenses.
We
consider individual store closings
to be a normal part of operations and regularly review store performance against
expectations. Costs associated with store closings are recognized at
the time of closing or when a liability has been incurred.
Advertising
We
expense advertising costs when
incurred. We participate in various advertising and marketing
cooperative programs with our vendors, who, under these programs, reimburse
us
for certain costs incurred. A receivable for cooperative advertising
to be reimbursed is recorded as a decrease to expense as advertisements are
run.
The
following table presents the
components of our advertising expense (in thousands):
Thirteen
Weeks Ended
|
Thirty-Nine
Weeks Ended
|
|||||||||||||||
November
3,
|
October
28,
|
November
3,
|
October
28,
|
|||||||||||||
2007
|
2006
|
2007
|
2006
|
|||||||||||||
Gross
advertising costs
|
$ |
1,220
|
$ |
1,024
|
$ |
5,113
|
$ |
4,033
|
||||||||
Advertising
reimbursements
|
(571 | ) | (515 | ) | (3,249 | ) | (2,838 | ) | ||||||||
Net
advertising costs
|
$ |
649
|
$ |
509
|
$ |
1,864
|
$ |
1,195
|
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
We
believe that the carrying amount
approximates fair value for cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments,
receivables and accounts payable, because of the short maturities of those
instruments.
2.
|
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
|
In
February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS
No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial
Liabilities – Including an Amendment of FASB Statement
115.” This statement permits companies to elect to measure
certain assets and liabilities at fair value. At each reporting date
subsequent to adoption, unrealized gains and losses on items for which the
fair
value option has been elected must be reported in earnings. SFAS No.
159 will be effective as of the beginning of the first fiscal year that begins
after November 15, 2007, or February 3, 2008 for our Company. We do
not expect the adoption of SFAS No. 159 to have a significant impact on our
consolidated financial statements.
In
September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS
No. 158, “Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other
Postretirement Plans, an amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106 and
132(R).” SFAS No. 158 requires recognition of the overfunded or
underfunded status of defined benefit postretirement plans as an asset or
liability in the statement of financial position and recognition of changes
in
that funded status in comprehensive income in the year in which the changes
occur. SFAS No. 158 also requires measurement of the funded status of
a plan as of the date of the statement of financial position. SFAS
No. 158 was effective for recognition of the funded status of the benefit plans
for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2006 and is effective for the
measurement date provisions for fiscal years ending after December 15,
2008. The adoption of SFAS No. 158 did not have a material effect on
our consolidated financial statements.
In
September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS
No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements.” SFAS No. 157 defines
fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally
accepted accounting principles and expands disclosures about fair value
measurements; however, it does not expand the use of fair value
measurements. SFAS No. 157 is effective for fiscal years beginning
after November 15, 2007, and interim periods within those fiscal
years. We will implement SFAS No. 157 on February 3, 2008 and
anticipate that the statement will not have a significant impact on our
consolidated financial statements.
9
3. Stock-Based
Compensation Plans
At
November 3, 2007, we had four stock-based compensation plans:
(a)
The 2005 Equity Incentive Plan (Incentive Plan) provides that the Board of
Directors may grant equity awards to certain employees of the Company at
its
discretion. The Incentive Plan was adopted effective July 1, 2005 and
authorizes grants of equity awards of up to 1,233,159 authorized but unissued
shares of common stock. At November 3, 2007, there were 904,482 shares
available for grant under the Incentive Plan.
(b)
The 2005 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (ESPP) allows for qualified employees
to
participate in the purchase of up to 204,794 shares of our common stock at
a
price equal to 85% of the lower of the closing price at the beginning or
end of
each quarterly stock purchase period. The ESPP was adopted effective July
1, 2005. At November 3, 2007, there were 164,407 shares available for
purchase under the ESPP.
(c)
The 2005 Director Deferred Compensation Plan (Deferred Plan) allows non-employee
directors an election to defer all or a portion of their fees into stock
units
or stock options. The Deferred Plan was adopted effective July 1, 2005 and
authorizes grants of stock up to 112,500 authorized but unissued shares of
common stock. At November 3, 2007, there were 110,440 shares available for
grant under the Deferred Plan.
(d)
The 2006 Non-Employee Director Equity Plan (DEP) provides for grants of equity
awards to non-employee directors. The DEP was adopted effective June 1,
2006 and authorizes grants of equity awards of up to 672,975 authorized but
unissued shares of common stock. At November 3, 2007, there were 637,285
shares available for grant under the DEP.
Our
plans allow for a variety of equity
awards including stock options, restricted stock awards, stock appreciation
rights and performance awards. As of November 3, 2007, the Company
had only granted awards in the form of stock options and restricted stock units
(RSUs). RSUs and options to purchase our common stock have been
granted to officers, directors and key employees. Beginning with the
adoption of the Incentive Plan, a greater proportion of the awards granted
to
employees, including executive employees, have been RSUs as opposed to stock
options when compared to grants made in prior years. The annual grant
made for fiscal 2008 to employees consisted solely of RSUs. We also
have awarded RSUs that are performance-based to our named executive officers
and
expect the Board will continue to grant more performance-based awards to key
employees in the future. The terms and vesting schedules for
stock-based awards vary by type of grant and generally vest upon time-based
conditions. Upon exercise, stock-based compensation awards are
settled with authorized but unissued company stock.
The
compensation costs that have been
charged against income for these plans were as follows for the thirteen and
thirty-nine weeks ended November 3, 2007 and October 28, 2006 (in
thousands):
Thirteen
Weeks Ended
|
Thirty-Nine
Weeks Ended
|
||||||||||||
November
3,
|
October
28,
|
November
3,
|
October
28,
|
||||||||||
2007
|
2006
|
2007
|
2006
|
||||||||||
Stock-based
compensation expense by type:
|
|||||||||||||
Stock
options
|
$ |
389
|
$ |
479
|
$ |
1,682
|
$ |
1,562
|
|||||
Restricted
stock awards
|
294
|
160
|
1,377
|
441
|
|||||||||
Employee
stock purchase
|
22
|
22
|
75
|
78
|
|||||||||
Director
deferred compensation
|
7
|
7
|
25
|
24
|
|||||||||
Total
stock-based compensation expense
|
712
|
668
|
3,159
|
2,105
|
|||||||||
Tax
benefit recognized
|
166
|
103
|
819
|
301
|
|||||||||
Stock-based
compensation expense, net of tax
|
$ |
546
|
$ |
565
|
$ |
2,340
|
$ |
1,804
|
In
accordance with SAB No. 107,
“Share-Based Payment,” issued in March 2005, share-based plan expense
has been included in store operating, selling and administrative expense since
it is incentive compensation. Certain other deferred stock
compensation plans are also reflected in store operating, selling and
administrative expense.
10
The
tax benefit recognized in our
condensed consolidated financial statements, as disclosed above, is based on
the
amount of compensation expense recorded for book purposes. The actual
tax benefit realized in our tax return is based on the intrinsic value, or
the
excess of the market value over the exercise or purchase price, of stock options
exercised and restricted stock awards vested during the period. The
actual tax benefit realized for the deductions considered on our tax returns
through November 3, 2007 and October 28, 2006, was from option exercises and
totaled $0.6 million and $2.4 million, respectively. There was no
capitalized stock-based compensation cost.
Stock
Options
Stock
options are granted with an
exercise price equal to the closing market price of our common stock on the
date
of grant. In the period between July 2005 and December 2006, stock
options were granted with an exercise price equal to the closing market price
of
our
common stock on the last trading day preceding the date of
grant. Vesting and expiration provisions vary between equity
plans. Grants awarded to employees under the original 1996 Stock
Option Plan (1996 Plan), as amended, vest over a five year period in equal
installments beginning on the first anniversary of the grant date and expire
ten
years from the date of grant. Grants awarded to employees under the
Incentive Plan vest over a four year period in equal installments beginning
on
the first anniversary of the grant date and expire in eight years from the
date
of grant with the exception of a grant made on August 18, 2005, whose provisions
provided for the five year vesting schedule and ten year term described in
the
1996 Plan. Grants awarded to outside directors under both the DEP and
Director Plan, vest immediately upon grant and expire on the tenth anniversary
of the date of grant.
Following
is the weighted-average fair
value of each option granted during the thirty-nine weeks ended November 3,
2007. The fair value was estimated on the date of grant using the
Black-Scholes pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions
for
the period:
Thirty-Nine
Weeks Ended
|
||||||
Quarter
1
|
Quarter
2
|
Quarter
3
|
||||
August
4,
|
November
3,
|
|||||
May
5, 2007
|
2007
|
2007
|
||||
Grant
date
|
3/19/07
|
3/31/07
|
6/30/07
|
9/30/07
|
||
Weighted
average fair value at grant date
|
$10.56
|
$10.68
|
|
$9.89
|
|
$9.56
|
Expected
option life (years)
|
4.07
|
4.07
|
4.07
|
4.20
|
||
Expected
volatility
|
39.22%
|
39.22%
|
|
36.33%
|
|
41.07%
|
Risk-free
interest rate
|
4.54%
|
4.55%
|
5.00%
|
4.11%
|
||
Dividend
yield
|
None
|
None
|
|
None
|
|
None
|
We
calculate the expected term for our
stock options based on historical employee exercise behavior. The
increase in our stock price in recent years has led to a pattern of earlier
exercise by employees. We also expect the reduction of the
contractual term from 10 years to 8 years to facilitate a pattern of earlier
exercise by employees and to contribute to a gradual decline in the average
expected term in future periods.
The
volatility used to value stock
options is based on historical volatility. We calculate historical
volatility using an average calculation methodology based on daily price
intervals as measured over the expected term of the option. We have
consistently applied this methodology since our adoption of the original
disclosure provisions of SFAS No. 123.
Beginning
with awards granted in the
second quarter of fiscal 2008, we base the risk-free interest rate on the annual
continuously compounded risk-free interest rate with a term equal to the
option’s expected term. Previously, we used the market yield on U.S.
Treasury securities. While the difference between the two rates is
minimal and has only a slight effect on the fair value calculation, we believe
using the annual continuously compounded risk-free rate is more compliant with
SFAS No. 123R. The dividend yield is assumed to be zero since we have
no current plan to declare dividends.
11
Activity
for our option plans during
the thirty-nine weeks ended November 3, 2007 was as follows:
Number
of
Shares
|
Weighted-Average
Exercise Price
|
Weighted-Average
Remaining Contractual Term (Years)
|
Aggregate
Intrinsic Value ($000's)
|
||||||||||
Options
outstanding at February 3, 2007
|
1,387,388
|
$ |
15.46
|
6.61
|
$ |
22,945
|
|||||||
Granted
|
26,086
|
28.31
|
9.87
|
7,511
|
|||||||||
Exercised
|
(68,981 | ) |
30.09
|
||||||||||
Cancelled
|
(3,000 | ) |
22.21
|
||||||||||
Options
outstanding at May 5, 2007
|
1,341,493
|
16.07
|
6.50
|
17,260
|
|||||||||
Granted
|
1,024
|
27.38
|
9.90
|
-
|
|||||||||
Exercised
|
(13,516 | ) |
28.40
|
||||||||||
Cancelled
|
(25,099 | ) |
27.35
|
||||||||||
Options
outstanding at August 4, 2007
|
1,303,902
|
15.87
|
6.23
|
11,654
|
|||||||||
Granted
|
1,130
|
24.80
|
9.91
|
-
|
|||||||||
Exercised
|
(8,581 | ) |
25.74
|
||||||||||
Cancelled
|
(7,544 | ) |
27.09
|
||||||||||
Options
outstanding at November 3, 2007
|
1,288,907
|
$ |
15.85
|
5.99
|
$ |
10,922
|
|||||||
Exercisable
at November 3, 2007
|
823,547
|
$ |
13.38
|
5.67
|
$ |
8,697
|
The
weighted-average grant fair value
of stock options granted during the thirteen weeks ended November 3, 2007 and
October 28, 2006 was $9.56 and $11.01, respectively. The compensation
expense included in store operating, selling and administrative expenses and
recognized during the periods was $0.4 million and $0.5 million, respectively,
before the recognized income tax benefit of $50,000 and $40,000,
respectively.
The
total intrinsic value of stock
options exercised during the thirteen weeks ended November 3, 2007 and October
28, 2006 was $135,000 and $311,000, respectively. The intrinsic value
of stock options is defined as the difference between the current market value
and the grant price. The total cash received from these stock option
exercises during the third quarter of fiscal 2008 and 2007 was $86,000 and
$193,000, respectively.
The
weighted-average grant fair value
of stock options granted during the thirty-nine weeks ended November 3, 2007
and
October 28, 2006 was $10.50 and $12.82, respectively. The
compensation expense included in store operating, selling and administrative
expenses and recognized during the periods was $1.7 million and $1.6 million,
respectively, before the recognized income tax benefit of $0.3 million and
$0.1
million, respectively.
The
total intrinsic value of stock
options exercised during the thirty-nine weeks ended November 3, 2007 and
October 28, 2006 was $1.8 million and $6.2 million, respectively. The
intrinsic value of stock options is defined as the difference between the
current market value and the grant price. The total cash received
from these stock option exercises through the third quarter of fiscal 2008
and
2007 was $0.9 million and $2.0 million, respectively. Receipts
from stock option exercises are included in cash flows from financing activities
as required by SFAS No. 123R. As of November 3, 2007, there was $3.2
million of unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested stock
options. This cost is expected to be recognized over a
weighted-average period of 2.16 years.
Restricted
Stock Awards
Restricted
stock awards are granted
with a fair value equal to the closing market price of our common stock on
the
date of grant with the exception of those granted between August 2005 and
December 2006 which were granted with a fair value equal to the closing market
price of our common stock on the last trading day preceding the date of
grant. Compensation expense is recorded straight-line over the
vesting period. Restricted stock awards generally cliff vest in four
to five years from the date of grant.
12
The
following table summarizes the
restricted stock awards activity under all of our plans during the thirty-nine
week period ended November 3, 2007:
Number
of Awards
|
Weighted-Average
Grant Date Fair Value
|
||||
Restricted
stock awards outstanding at February 3, 2007
|
87,923
|
$ |
29.66
|
||
Granted
|
124,425
|
28.30
|
|||
Vested
|
-
|
-
|
|||
Forfeited
|
(516 | ) |
30.46
|
||
Restricted
stock awards outstanding at May 5, 2007
|
211,832
|
28.86
|
|||
Granted
|
-
|
-
|
|||
Vested
|
-
|
-
|
|||
Forfeited
|
(22,354 | ) |
27.27
|
||
Restricted
stock awards outstanding at August 4, 2007
|
189,478
|
29.05
|
|||
Granted
|
-
|
-
|
|||
Vested
|
-
|
-
|
|||
Forfeited
|
(2,513 | ) |
28.96
|
||
Restricted
stock awards outstanding at November 3, 2007
|
186,965
|
$ |
29.05
|
The
weighted-average grant date fair
value of our RSUs granted was $28.30 and $29.67 for the thirty-nine weeks ended
November 3, 2007 and October 28, 2006, respectively. There were no
restricted stock awards granted during the thirteen weeks ended November 3,
2007
or October 28, 2006. The compensation expense included in store
operating, selling and administrative expenses and recognized during the
comparable thirteen week periods was $0.3 million and $0.2 million,
respectively, before the recognized income tax benefit of $0.1 million and
$60,000, respectively. The compensation expense included in store
operating, selling and administrative expenses and recognized during the
comparable thirty-nine week periods was $1.4 million and $0.4 million,
respectively, before the recognized income tax benefit of $0.5 million and
$0.2
million, respectively.
There
were no restricted stock awards
that vested during the period. The total intrinsic value of our
restricted stock awards outstanding and unvested at November 3, 2007 and October
28, 2006 was $4.3 million and $2.4 million, respectively. As of
November 3, 2007,
there was approximately $3.2 million of total unrecognized compensation cost
related to restricted stock awards. This cost is expected to be
recognized over a weighted-average period of 3.14 years.
Employee
Stock Purchase Plan
The
Company’s ESPP allows eligible
employees the right to purchase shares of our common stock, subject to certain
limitations, at 85% of the lesser of the fair market value at the end of each
calendar quarter (purchase date) or the beginning of each calendar
quarter. Our employees purchased 4,304 shares of common stock at
$21.08 per share through the ESPP during the thirteen weeks ended November
3,
2007. The assumptions used in the option pricing model for the
thirteen weeks ended November 3, 2007 were: (a) expected life of 3 months (.25
years); (b) volatility of 36.3%; (c) risk-free interest rate of 4.75%; and
(d)
dividend yield of 0.0%. The weighted-average grant date fair value of
ESPP options granted during the thirteen weeks ended November 3, 2007 was
$5.57. Our employees purchased 13,221 shares of common stock at an
average price of $22.95 per share during the thirty-nine weeks ended November
3,
2007. The assumptions used in the option pricing model for the
thirty-nine weeks ended November 3, 2007 were: (a) expected life of 3 months
(.25 years); (b) volatility between 36.3% and 41.8%; (c) risk-free interest
rate
between 4.75% and 5.08%; and (d) dividend yield of 0.0%. The
weighted-average grant date fair value of ESPP options granted during the
thirty-nine weeks ended November 3, 2007 was $6.07.
During
the thirteen weeks ended October
28, 2006, our employees purchased 4,331 shares of common stock at $20.32 per
share through the ESPP. The assumptions used in the option pricing
model for the thirteen weeks ended October 28, 2006 were: (a) expected life
of 3
months (.25 years); (b) volatility of 40.7%; (c) risk-free interest rate of
4.93%; and (d) dividend yield of 0.0%. The weighted-average grant
date fair value of ESPP options granted during the thirteen weeks ended October
28, 2006 was $5.07. Our employees purchased 14,206 shares of common
stock at an average price of $21.96 per share during the thirty-nine weeks
ended
October 28, 2006. The assumptions used in the option pricing model
for the thirty-nine weeks ended October 28, 2006 were: (a) expected life of
3
months (.25 years); (b) volatility between 40.7% and 41.0%; (c) risk-free
interest rate between 3.98% and 4.93%; and (d) dividend yield of
0.0%. The weighted-average grant date fair value of ESPP options
granted during the thirty-nine weeks ended October 28, 2006 was
$6.02.
13
The
expense related to the ESPP was
determined using the Black-Scholes option pricing model and the provisions
of
FASB Technical Bulletin (FTB) No. 97-1, “Accounting under Statement 123 for
Certain Employee Stock Purchase Plans with a Look-Back Option,” as amended
by SFAS No. 123R. The compensation expense included in store
operating, selling and administrative expenses and recognized
during the thirteen weeks ended November 3, 2007 and October 28, 2006 was
approximately $22,000 for both periods. The compensation expense
included in store operating, selling and administrative expenses and recognized
during the thirty-nine weeks ended November 3, 2007 and October 28, 2006 was
approximately $75,000 and $78,000, respectively.
Director
Deferred Compensation
Under
the Deferred Plan, outside
non-employee directors can elect to defer all or a portion of their board and
board committee fees into cash, stock options or deferred stock
units. Those fees deferred into stock options are subject to the same
provisions as provided for in the DEP and are expensed and accounted for
accordingly. Director fees deferred into our common stock are
calculated and expensed each calendar quarter by taking total fees earned during
the calendar quarter and dividing by the closing price on the last day of the
calendar quarter, rounded to the nearest whole share. The total
annual retainer, board and board committee fees for non-employee directors
that
are not deferred into stock options, but which includes amounts deferred into
stock units under the Deferred Plan, are expensed as incurred in all periods
presented. A total of 292 and 277 stock units were deferred under
this plan during the third quarter of fiscal 2008 and fiscal 2007,
respectively. A total of 918 and 905 stock units were deferred under
this plan through the third quarter of fiscal 2008 and fiscal 2007,
respectively.
The
compensation expense included in
store operating, selling and administrative expenses and recognized during
each
of the thirteen weeks ended November 3, 2007 and October 28, 2006 was
approximately $7,000 before the recognized income tax benefit of approximately
$3,000 in each period. The compensation expense included in store
operating, selling and administrative expenses and recognized during the
thirty-nine weeks ended November 3, 2007 and October 28, 2006 was approximately
$25,000 and $24,000, respectively, before the recognized income tax benefit
of
approximately $10,000 and $9,000, respectively.
4.
|
Earnings
Per Share
|
The
computation of basic earnings per
share (EPS) is based on the number of weighted-average common shares outstanding
during the period. The computation of diluted EPS is based on the
weighted-average number of shares outstanding plus the incremental shares that
would be outstanding assuming exercise of dilutive stock options and issuance
of
restricted stock. The number of incremental shares is calculated by
applying the treasury stock method. The following table sets forth
the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share:
Thirteen
Weeks Ended
|
Thirty-Nine
Weeks Ended
|
||||||||||||||
November
3,
|
October
28,
|
November
3,
|
October
28,
|
||||||||||||
2007
|
2006
|
2007
|
2006
|
||||||||||||
Net
income, in thousands
|
$ |
7,815
|
$ |
9,926
|
$ |
22,723
|
$ |
25,469
|
|||||||
Weighted-average
number of common
|
|||||||||||||||
shares
outstanding
|
31,074,731
|
31,982,045
|
31,312,106
|
32,221,569
|
|||||||||||
Effect
of dilutive securities:
|
|||||||||||||||
Stock
options
|
416,542
|
445,425
|
443,936
|
498,941
|
|||||||||||
Restricted
stock units
|
62,363
|
12,863
|
66,464
|
21,976
|
|||||||||||
Weighted-average
number of common
|
|||||||||||||||
shares
outstanding and dilutive securities
|
31,553,636
|
32,440,333
|
31,822,506
|
32,742,486
|
|||||||||||
Earnings
per share:
|
|||||||||||||||
Basic
|
$ |
0.25
|
$ |
0.31
|
$ |
0.73
|
$ |
0.79
|
|||||||
Dilutive
|
$ |
0.25
|
$ |
0.31
|
$ |
0.71
|
$ |
0.78
|
In
calculating diluted earnings per
share for the thirteen weeks and thirty-nine weeks ended November 3, 2007
options to purchase 279,681 shares of common stock were outstanding as of
the
end of the period, but were not included in the computation of diluted earnings
per share due to their anti-dilutive effect. In calculating diluted
earnings per share for the thirteen and thirty-nine weeks ended October 28,
2006, options to purchase 448,976 shares of common stock were outstanding
as of
the end of the period, but were not included in the computation of diluted
earnings per share due to their anti-dilutive effect.
14
5. Stock
Repurchase Plan
In
August 2004, our Board of Directors
(The Board) authorized a plan to repurchase our common stock. The
Board has subsequently authorized increases to this plan with a current
authorization effective August 2006 of $150.0 million. Stock
repurchases may be made in the open market or in negotiated transactions until
February 2, 2008, with the amount and timing of repurchases dependent on market
conditions and at the discretion of our management.
We
repurchased 242,900 of our common
stock during the thirteen weeks ended November 3, 2007 at a cost of $5.7
million. For the thirty-nine weeks ended November 3, 2007, we
repurchased 970,300 shares of our common stock at a cost of $26.4 million
bringing the total shares repurchased to 5,276,713 shares at a cost of $123.8
million.
In
November 2007, subsequent to the
third quarter, our Board of Directors increased its authorization to repurchase
our common stock by an additional $100.0 million to $250.0 million and extended
its authorization through January 30, 2010. After considering past
stock repurchases, approximately $126.2 million of the total authorization
remained for future stock repurchases at November 3, 2007.
6.
|
Properties
|
We
currently lease all of our existing
650 store locations and expect that our policy of leasing rather than owning
will continue as we continue to expand. Our leases typically provide
for terms of five to ten years with options on our part to
extend. Most leases also contain a kick-out clause if projected sales
levels are not met and an early termination/remedy option if
co-tenancy and exclusivity provisions are violated. We believe that
this leasing strategy enhances our flexibility to pursue various expansion
opportunities resulting from changing market conditions and to periodically
re-evaluate store locations. Our ability to open new stores is
contingent upon locating satisfactory sites, negotiating favorable leases,
recruiting and training qualified management personnel and the availability
of market relevant inventory.
As
current leases expire, we believe
that we will be able to either obtain lease renewals for present store locations
or to obtain leases for equivalent or better locations in the same general
area. For the most part, we have not experienced any significant
difficulty in either renewing leases for existing locations or securing leases
for suitable locations for new stores. Based primarily on our belief
that we maintain good relations with our landlords, that most of our leases
are
at approximate market rents and that generally we have been able to secure
leases for suitable locations, we believe that our lease strategy will not
be
detrimental to our business, financial condition or results of
operations.
Our
corporate offices and our retail
distribution center are leased under an operating lease. We also own
a small warehouse located in Birmingham, Alabama that houses inventory for
educational institutions and youth associations.
As
recently as late August 2007, we
discussed plans to open a second distribution center in or around Dallas, Texas
within the next 12 months. However, with an additional investment in
our current distribution center, additional warehousing space in Birmingham
for
new store accumulation and the larger number of new store opportunities in
our
core states and the lower Midwest, we believe our current distribution center
is
suitable to support our anticipated growth over the next few years.
We
currently operate 650 stores in 23
contiguous states. Of these stores, 218 are located in malls and 432
are located in strip centers which are generally the centers of commerce and
which are usually anchored by a Wal-Mart store. Over the last several
years, we have
typically concentrated our store base growth in the most dominant strip center
within the market we target.
7.
|
Accounting
for the Impairment of Long-Lived
Assets
|
We
continually evaluate whether events
and circumstances have occurred that indicate the remaining balance of
long-lived assets and intangibles may be impaired and not
recoverable. Our policy is to recognize any impairment loss on
long-lived assets as a charge to current income when certain events or changes
in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of the assets may not be
recoverable. Impairment is assessed considering the estimated
undiscounted cash flows over the asset’s remaining life. If estimated
cash flows are insufficient to recover the investment, an impairment loss is
recognized based on a comparison of the cost of the asset to fair value less
any
costs of disposition.
8.
|
Commitments
and Contingencies
|
Lease
Commitments.
We
lease the premises for our retail
sporting goods stores under non-cancelable operating leases having initial
or
remaining terms of more than one year. The leases typically provide for terms
of
five to ten years with options on our part to extend. Many of our leases contain
scheduled increases in annual rent payments and the majority of our leases
also
require us to pay common area maintenance, insurance and real estate taxes.
Additionally, many of the lease agreements contain tenant improvement
allowances, rent holidays and/or rent escalation clauses (contingent rentals).
For purposes of recognizing incentives and minimum rental expenses on a
straight-line basis over the terms of the leases,
15
we
use
the date of initial possession to begin amortization, which is generally when
we
enter the space and begin to make improvements in preparation of our intended
use.
Most
of our retail store leases contain
provisions that allow for early termination of the lease if certain
predetermined annual sales levels are not met. Generally, these provisions
allow
the lease to be terminated between the third and fifth year of the lease. Should
the lease be terminated under these provisions, in some cases, the unamortized
portion of any landlord allowances related to that property would be payable
to
the landlord.
We
also lease certain computer
hardware, office equipment and transportation equipment under non-cancelable
operating leases having initial or remaining terms of more than one
year.
During
the thirty-nine weeks ended
November 3, 2007, we increased our lease commitments by a net of 37 retail
stores, one short-term warehousing location and various office and
transportation equipment. The retail stores have initial lease
termination dates between January 2012 and November 2017. At November
3, 2007, the future minimum lease payments, excluding maintenance, insurance
and
real estate taxes, for our current operating leases and including the net 37
store operating leases added during the thirty-nine weeks ended November 3,
2007, were as follows (in thousands):
Remaining
Fiscal 2008
|
$
|
8,780
|
|
Fiscal
2009
|
37,310
|
||
Fiscal
2010
|
|
32,180
|
|
Fiscal
2011
|
25,477
|
||
Fiscal
2012
|
|
19,186
|
|
Fiscal
2013
|
13,888
|
||
Thereafter
|
|
28,117
|
|
TOTAL
|
$
|
164,938
|
Additionally,
in February 1996, we
entered into a sale-leaseback transaction to finance our distribution center
and
office facilities. In December 1999, the related operating lease was
amended to include the fiscal 2000 expansion of these
facilities. This lease will expire in December 2014.
Incentive
Bonuses
Specified
officers and employees of our
Company are entitled to incentive bonuses, primarily based on net earnings
of
our Company or particular operations thereof. At November 3, 2007 and
February 3, 2007, there was $1.0 million and $2.1 million of bonus related
expense included in accrued expenses.
In
addition, starting in March 2006,
the Compensation Committee (Committee) of the Board of Directors of our Company
began placing performance criteria on awards of RSUs to our named executive
officers under the Incentive Plan. The performance criterion is
primarily tied to performance targets with respect to future sales and Company
profit over a specified period of time. These performance-based
awards of RSUs are being expensed under the provisions of SFAS No. 123R and
assume that the performance conditions set within will be met. We
expect the Committee to continue to place performance criteria on awards of
RSUs
to our named executive officers.
Legal
Proceedings and Other Contingencies.
In
October 2005, three former employees
filed a lawsuit in Mississippi federal court alleging they are owed back wages
for overtime because they were improperly classified as exempt salaried
employees. They also alleged other wage and hour violations. The suit asked
the
court to certify the case as a collective action under the Fair Labor Standards
Act on behalf of all similarly situated employees. We dispute the allegations
of
wrongdoing in this complaint and have vigorously defended ourselves in this
matter. However, the parties have negotiated a settlement and the court has
now
ruled to certify the collective action in accordance with the negotiated
settlement. We have begun to make some initial distributions, and at
November 3, 2007, we have estimated that the remaining liability related to
this
matter is $600,000. Accordingly, we have accrued $600,000 as a
current liability on our condensed consolidated balance sheet. At
October 28, 2006, no loss amount was accrued because a loss was not considered
probable or estimable.
We
are also party to other legal
proceedings incidental to our business. We do not believe that any of these
matters will, individually or in the aggregate, have a material adverse effect
on our business or financial condition. We cannot give assurance, however,
that
one or more of these lawsuits will not have a material adverse effect on our
results of operations for the period in which they are resolved.
From
time to time, we enter into
certain types of agreements that require us to indemnify parties against third
party claims under certain circumstances. Generally these agreements relate
to:
(a) agreements with vendors and suppliers under which we may
provide
16
customary
indemnification to our vendors and suppliers in respect of actions they take
at
our request or otherwise on our behalf; (b) agreements to indemnify vendors
against trademark and copyright infringement claims concerning merchandise
manufactured specifically for or on behalf of the Company; (c) real estate
leases, under which we may agree to indemnify the lessors from claims arising
from our use of the property; and (d) agreements with our directors, officers
and employees, under which we may agree to indemnify such persons for
liabilities arising out of their relationship with us. The Company has director
and officer liability insurance, which, subject to the policy’s conditions,
provides coverage for indemnification amounts payable by us with respect to
our
directors and officers up to specified limits and subject to certain
deductibles.
9. Income
Taxes
Our
effective tax rate is based on
expected income, statutory tax rates and tax planning opportunities available
in
the various jurisdictions in which we operate. For interim financial
reporting, we estimate the annual tax rate based on projected taxable income
for
the full year and record a quarterly income tax provision in accordance with
the
anticipated annual rate. As the year progresses, we refine the
estimates of the year’s taxable income as new information becomes available,
including year-to-date financial results. This continual estimation
process often results in a change to our expected effective tax rate for the
year. When this occurs, we adjust the income tax provision during the
quarter in which the change in estimate occurs so that the year-to-date
provision reflects the expected annual tax rate. Significant judgment
is required in determining our effective tax rate and in evaluating our tax
positions.
In
accordance with SFAS No. 109, we
recognize deferred tax assets and liabilities based on the difference between
the financial statement carrying amounts and the tax basis of assets and
liabilities. Deferred tax assets represent items to be used as a tax
deduction or credit in future tax returns for which we have already properly
recorded the tax benefit in the income statement. At least quarterly,
we assess the likelihood that the deferred tax assets balance will be
recovered. We take into account such factors as prior earnings
history, expected future earnings, carryback and carryforward periods and tax
strategies that could potentially enhance the likelihood of a realization of
a
deferred tax asset. To the extent recovery is not more likely than
not, a valuation allowance is established against the deferred tax asset,
increasing our income tax expense in the year such determination is
made.
Additionally,
due to the adoption of
FIN No. 48 (as described in Note 1), we have revised our policy on income taxes
with respect to accounting for uncertain tax positions. We consider
our policy on income taxes to be a critical accounting policy due to the
significant level of estimates, assumptions and judgments and its potential
impact on our consolidated financial statements.
We
adopted FIN No. 48 effective
February 4, 2007. In accordance with FIN No. 48, we recognize a tax
benefit associated with an uncertain tax position when, in our judgment, it
is
more likely than not that the position will be sustained upon examination by
a
taxing authority. For a tax position that meets the
more-likely-than-not recognition threshold, we initially and subsequently
measure the tax benefit as the largest amount that we judge to have a greater
than 50% likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement with a taxing
authority. Our liability associated with unrecognized tax benefits is
adjusted periodically due to changing circumstances, such as the progress of
tax
audits, case law developments and new or emerging legislation. Such
adjustments are recognized entirely in the period in which they are
identified. Our effective tax rate includes the net impact of changes
in the liability for unrecognized tax benefits and subsequent adjustments as
considered appropriate by management.
A
number of years may elapse before a
particular matter for which we have recorded a liability related to an
unrecognized tax benefit is audited and finally resolved. The number
of years with open tax audits varies by jurisdiction. While it is
often difficult to predict the final outcome or the timing of resolution of
any
particular tax matter, we believe our liability for unrecognized tax benefits
is
adequate. Favorable settlement of an unrecognized tax benefit could
be recognized as a reduction in our effective tax rate in the period of
resolution. Unfavorable settlement of an unrecognized tax benefit
could increase the effective tax rate and may require the use of cash in the
period of resolution. Our liability for unrecognized tax benefits is
generally presented as non-current. However, if we anticipate paying
cash within one year to settle an uncertain tax position, the liability is
presented as current.
We
classify interest and penalties
recognized on the liability for unrecognized tax benefits as income tax
expense.
17
Overview
Hibbett
Sports, Inc. operates sporting
goods stores in small to mid-sized markets, predominantly in the Sunbelt,
Mid-Atlantic and the lower Midwest. Our stores offer a broad
assortment of quality athletic equipment, footwear and apparel with a high
level
of customer service. As of November 3, 2007, we operated a total of
650 retail stores composed of 628 Hibbett Sports stores, 18 Sports Additions
athletic shoe stores and 4 Sports & Co. superstores in 23
states.
Our
primary retail format and growth
vehicle is Hibbett Sports, a 5,000 square-foot store located in dominant strip
centers which are usually anchored by a Wal-Mart store and in enclosed
malls. Over the last several years, we have concentrated and expect
to continue our store base growth in strip centers versus enclosed
malls. We believe Hibbett Sports stores are typically the primary
sporting goods retailer in their markets due to the extensive selection of
quality branded merchandise and a high level of customer service. We
do not expect that the average size of our stores opening in fiscal 2008 will
vary significantly from the average size of stores opened in fiscal
2007.
We
historically have comparable store
sales increases in the low to mid-single digit range, and we plan to increase
total company-wide square footage by approximately 13% in fiscal
2008. We believe total sales percentage growth will be in the low to
mid single digits in fiscal 2008 due to the timing of new store openings and
the
unfavorable calendar comparison of 52- versus 53-weeks last year as noted
below. Over the past several years, we have
increased our product margin due to improved vendor discounts, fewer retail
reductions, increased efficiencies in logistics and favorable leveraging of
store occupancy costs. We expect a slight improvement in product margin in
fiscal 2008 attributable to improved vendor discounts offset by
markdowns.
Due
to our increased sales, we have
historically leveraged our store operating, selling and administrative
expenses. Based on projected sales, we expect operating, selling and
administrative expense rates to increase in fiscal 2008 due to the movement
of
certain stock option expense into fiscal 2008 and the new store cost related
to
approximately 18 additional new stores over fiscal 2007. We also
expect to continue to generate sufficient cash to enable us to expand and
remodel our store base, to provide capital expenditures for both distribution
center and technology upgrade projects and to repurchase shares of our common
stock through the stock repurchase plan.
As
recently as late August 2007, we
discussed plans to open a second distribution center in or around Dallas, Texas
within the next 12 months. However, with an additional investment in
our current distribution center, additional warehousing space in Birmingham
for
new store accumulation and the larger number of new store opportunities in
our
core states and the lower Midwest, we believe our current distribution center
is
suitable to support our anticipated growth over the next few years.
Hibbett
maintains a merchandise
management system that allows us to identify and monitor
trends. However, this system does not produce generally accepted
accounting principle (GAAP) financial information by product
category. Thus it is impracticable to provide GAAP net sales by
product category.
Hibbett
operates on a 52- or 53-week
fiscal year ending on the Saturday nearest to January 31 of each year. The
consolidated statements of operations for fiscal year ended February 2, 2008,
will include 52 weeks of operations, while the fiscal year ended February 3,
2007 included 53 weeks of operations. We have operated as a public
company and have been incorporated under the laws of the State of Delaware
since
October 6, 1996.
18
Results
of Operations
The
following table sets forth
condensed consolidated statements of operations items expressed as a percentage
of net sales for the periods indicated:
Thirteen
Weeks Ended
|
Thirty-Nine
Weeks Ended
|
|||||||||||||||
November
3,
|
October
28,
|
November
3,
|
October
28,
|
|||||||||||||
2007
|
2006
|
2007
|
2006
|
|||||||||||||
Net
sales
|
100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | ||||||||
Cost
of goods sold, including distribution
|
||||||||||||||||
and
store occupancy costs
|
67.2
|
66.8
|
66.9
|
66.8
|
||||||||||||
Gross
profit
|
32.8
|
33.2
|
33.1
|
33.2
|
||||||||||||
Store
operating, selling and
|
||||||||||||||||
administrative
expenses
|
20.8
|
19.1
|
21.0
|
19.8
|
||||||||||||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
2.3
|
2.1
|
2.4
|
2.3
|
||||||||||||
Operating
income
|
9.7
|
12.0
|
9.7
|
11.1
|
||||||||||||
Interest
income
|
0.1
|
0.2
|
0.1
|
0.2
|
||||||||||||
Interest
expense
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
||||||||||||
Interest
income, net
|
0.1
|
0.2
|
0.1
|
0.2
|
||||||||||||
Income
before provision for income taxes
|
9.8
|
12.2
|
9.8
|
11.3
|
||||||||||||
Provision
for income taxes
|
3.7
|
4.6
|
3.8
|
4.3
|
||||||||||||
Net
income
|
6.0 | % | 7.7 | % | 6.0 | % | 7.1 | % |
Note: Columns
may not foot due to rounding.
Thirteen
Weeks Ended November 3, 2007 Compared to Thirteen Weeks Ended October 28,
2006
Net
sales. Net
sales remained essentially flat decreasing $31,000, or 0.02%, to $129.6 million
for the thirteen weeks ended November 3, 2007 from $129.7 million for the
comparable period in the prior year. The following factors helped
define this quarter:
|
·
|
We
opened 18 Hibbett Sports stores and closed 2 in the thirteen weeks
ended
November 3, 2007. New stores and stores not in the comparable
store net sales calculation increased $8.1 million during the thirteen
week period.
|
|
·
|
We
experienced a 6.6% decrease in comparable store net sales for the
thirteen
weeks ended November 3, 2007. Lower comparable store net sales
offset the increase in net sales attributable to new stores. We
attribute this decrease to the shift in our retail calendar as a
result of
the 53rd
week in fiscal 2007 compared to the normal 52-week
year. Comparable store, comparable week sales for the thirteen
weeks ended November 3, 2007 compared to the thirteen weeks ended
November
4, 2006 increased 1.2%.
|
The
decrease in comparable store sales
on a fiscal basis was primarily attributable to the shift in the retail calendar
that changed the timing of some of our tax free holiday shopping days into
the
second quarter compared to the third quarter last year.
We
experienced the following
performance trends in the thirteen week period:
|
·
|
Athletic
performance apparel performed well across all genders (men’s, women’s and
children’s) led by Under Armour, Nike and Adidas. Accessories
such as socks, backpacks and vendor bags were strong performers in
the
quarter.
|
|
·
|
Urban
and licensed apparel underperformed through the third
quarter. Urban apparel has been trending down for several
quarters and we have taken steps to improve our mix to become more
fashionable. Licensed apparel underperformed relative to the
underperformance of teams in our market on the
field.
|
|
·
|
Footwear
and cleats were up mid-single digits led by kids
footwear. Strong performers included Nike, New Balance, Asics
and Adidas. Classics and urban footwear continued its downward
trend.
|
19
Comparable
store net sales data for the
period reflects sales for our traditional format Hibbett Sports and Sports
Additions stores open throughout the period and the corresponding period of
the
prior fiscal year. If a store remodel or relocation results in the
store being closed for a significant period of time, its sales are removed
from
the comparable store base until it has been open a full 12
months. During the thirteen weeks ended November 3, 2007, 557 stores
were included in the comparable store sales comparison. Our four
Sports & Co. stores are not and have never been included in the comparable
store net sales comparison because we have not opened a superstore since
September 1996 nor do we have plans to open additional superstores in the
future.
Gross
profit. Cost
of goods sold includes the cost of inventory, occupancy costs for stores and
occupancy and operating costs for the distribution center. Gross
profit was $42.5 million, or 32.8% of net sales, in the thirteen weeks ended
November 3, 2007, compared with $43.1 million, or 33.2% of net sales, in the
same period of the prior fiscal year. Our decrease in gross profit
was due primarily to the deleveraging of store occupancy and distribution
expense, offset by an improvement in product gross
margin. Distribution expense experienced increases in data processing
and fuel costs. Occupancy expense saw its largest increase in rental
expense as a percent to sales due to total sales volume and more opened stores
this year versus last year. Product gross margin improved due to
favorable inventories and a reduction in our obsolescence reserve.
Store
operating, selling and
administrative expenses. Store operating, selling and
administrative expenses were $26.9 million, or 20.8% of net sales, for the
thirteen weeks ended November 3, 2007, compared to $24.8 million, or 19.1%
of
net sales, for the comparable period a year ago. We attribute this
increase to the following factors:
|
·
|
Salary
and benefit costs increased in our stores by 100 basis points, resulting
primarily from flat sales, while slightly decreasing at the administrative
level.
|
|
·
|
Net
advertising expenses increased 11 basis points as we increased our
advertising efforts for new and low performing stores and to combat
sluggish sales. Inventory counting expenses increased 14 basis
points due to more scheduled counts and higher inventory
levels. Bank card fees increased 13 basis points as we are
experiencing higher credit and debit card
transactions.
|
|
·
|
Slightly
offsetting the increases above were decreases in new store costs
and
freight and shipping expenses.
|
Depreciation
and
amortization. Depreciation and amortization as a percentage of
net sales was 2.3% in the thirteen weeks ended November 3, 2007 compared to
2.1%
for the comparable period a year ago. The weighted-average lease term
of new store leases added during the thirteen weeks ended November 3, 2007
compared to those added during the thirteen weeks ended October 28, 2006,
decreased in lease terms at 6.81 years compared to 7.46 years,
respectively. We attribute the increase in depreciation expense as a
percent to sales to the shorter lease terms as well as the information systems
placed in service as of February 4, 2007.
Provision
for income
taxes. Provision for income taxes as a percentage of net sales
was 3.7% in the thirteen weeks ended November 3, 2007, compared to 4.6% for
the
thirteen weeks ended October 28, 2006. The combined federal, state
and local effective income tax rate as a percentage of pre-tax income was 38.2%
and 37.4% for the thirteen weeks ended November 3, 2007 and October 28, 2006,
respectively. The increase in rate over last year is primarily the
result of permanent differences related to incentive stock options and related
employee exercise behavior, higher state tax rates and the adoption of FIN
No.
48.
Thirty-Nine
Weeks Ended November 3, 2007 Compared to Thirty-Nine Weeks Ended October 28,
2006
Net
sales. Net
sales increased $16.9 million, or 4.7%, to $377.9 million for the thirty-nine
weeks ended November 3, 2007 from $360.9 million for the comparable period
in
the prior year. We attribute this increase to the following
factors:
|
·
|
We
opened 44 Hibbett Sports stores and closed 7 in the thirty-nine weeks
ended November 3, 2007. New stores and stores not in the
comparable store net sales calculation increased $25.4 million during
the
thirty-nine week period.
|
|
·
|
We
experienced a 2.5% decrease in comparable store net sales for the
thirty-nine weeks ended November 3, 2007. We attribute this
decrease to the shift in our retail calendar as a result of the 53rd
week in
fiscal 2007 compared to the normal 52-week year. Comparable
store, comparable week sales for the thirty-nine weeks ended November
3,
2007 compared to the thirty-nine weeks ended November 4, 2006 decreased
1.2%.
|
The
decrease in comparable store sales
on a fiscal basis was primarily attributable to a weak market in our urban
consumer, especially in our urban enclosed mall locations coupled with the
overall weakness in our industry.
We
experienced the following
performance trends in the thirty-nine week period:
|
·
|
Athletic
performance apparel was up mid-single digits, led by kid’s activewear
which was up double digits. Key vendors were Under Armour, Nike
and Adidas.
|
|
·
|
Team
equipment and licensed apparel are performing below expectations
year-to-date.
|
|
·
|
Kid’s
footwear and cleats continue to perform well led by Nike, New Balance,
Adidas and Asics while classics and urban footwear
underperformed.
|
|
·
|
Strip
center stores continue to outperform enclosed mall
stores.
|
20
Comparable
store net sales data for the
period reflects sales for our traditional format Hibbett Sports and Sports
Additions stores open throughout the period and the corresponding period of
the
prior fiscal year. If a store remodel or relocation results in the
store being closed for a significant period of time, its sales are removed
from
the comparable store base until it has been open a full 12
months. During the thirty-nine weeks ended November 3, 2007, 527
stores were included in the comparable store sales comparison. Our
four Sports & Co. stores are not and have never been included in the
comparable store net sales comparison because we have not opened a superstore
since September 1996 nor do we have plans to open additional superstores in
the
future.
Gross
profit. Cost
of goods sold includes the cost of inventory, occupancy costs for stores and
occupancy and operating costs for the distribution center. Gross
profit was $125.0 million, or 33.1% of net sales, in the thirty-nine weeks
ended
November 3, 2007, compared with $119.9 million, or 33.2% of net sales, in the
same period of the prior fiscal year. The slight decrease in gross
profit was due primarily to some deleveraging of store and occupancy costs
and
distribution expense offset by improved product margins. Store
occupancy expenses saw its largest increase in rental
expense. Distribution expense experienced increases primarily in data
processing costs resulting from contract labor costs to support information
technology upgrades and projects.
Store
operating, selling and
administrative expenses. Store operating, selling and
administrative expenses were $79.5 million, or 21.0% of net sales, for the
thirty-nine weeks ended November 3, 2007, compared to $71.6 million, or 19.8%
of
net sales, for the comparable period a year ago. We attribute this
increase to the following factors:
|
·
|
Stock-based
compensation accounted for 25 basis points, primarily because of
the
movement of certain grant dates into the first quarter as compared
to a
year ago.
|
|
·
|
Salary
and benefit costs increased in our stores by 61 basis points while
decreasing slightly at the administrative level. Net
advertising expenses increased 16 basis points due primarily to increased
advertising efforts for new and low performing stores. Data
processing costs also increased by 10 basis points as we supported
the new
JDA Merchandising System.
|
|
·
|
Slightly
offsetting the increases above were decreases in new store costs
and
business insurance as a percent to
sales.
|
Depreciation
and
amortization. Depreciation and amortization as a percentage of
net sales was 2.4% in the thirty-nine weeks ended November 3, 2007 compared
to
2.3% for the comparable period a year ago. The weighted-average lease
term of new store leases added through November 3, 2007 compared to those added
through October 28, 2006, decreased in lease terms at 6.88 years compared to
7.37 years, respectively. We attribute the increase in depreciation
expense as a percent to sales to the shorter lease terms as well as the
information systems placed in service as of February 4, 2007.
Provision
for income
taxes. Provision for income taxes as a percentage of net sales
was 3.8% in the thirty-nine weeks ended November 3, 2007, compared to 4.3%
for
the thirty-nine weeks ended October 28, 2006. The combined federal,
state and local effective income tax rate as a percentage of pre-tax income
was
38.5% and 37.6% for the thirty-nine weeks ended November 3, 2007 and October
28,
2006, respectively. The increase in rate over last year is primarily
the result of permanent differences related to incentive stock options and
related employee exercise behavior, higher state tax rates and the adoption
of
FIN No. 48.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
Our
capital requirements relate
primarily to stock repurchases, working capital requirements and new store
openings. Our working capital requirements are somewhat seasonal in
nature and typically reach their peak near the end of the third and the
beginning of the fourth quarters of our fiscal year. Historically, we
have funded our cash requirements primarily through our cash flow from
operations and occasionally from borrowings under our revolving credit
facilities.
Our
statements of cash flows are
summarized as follows (in thousands):
Thirty-Nine
Weeks Ended
|
||||||||
November
3,
|
October
28,
|
|||||||
2007
|
2006
|
|||||||
Net
cash provided by operating activities:
|
$ |
15,588
|
$ |
10,456
|
||||
Net
cash (used in) provided by investing activities:
|
(10,448 | ) |
1,877
|
|||||
Net
cash used in financing activities:
|
(24,756 | ) | (25,537 | ) | ||||
Net
decrease in cash and cash equivalents
|
$ | (19,616 | ) | $ | (13,204 | ) |
Operating
Activities.
Cash
flow from operations is seasonal
in our business. Typically, we use cash flow from operations to
increase inventory in advance of peak selling seasons, such as pre-Christmas
and
back-to-school. Inventory levels are reduced in connection with
higher sales
21
during
the peak selling seasons and this inventory reduction, combined with
proportionately higher net income, typically produces a positive cash
flow.
Net
cash provided by operating
activities was $15.6 million for the thirty-nine weeks ended November 3, 2007
compared with net cash provided by operating activities of $10.5 million for
the
thirty-nine weeks ended October 28, 2006. The largest uses of cash
during the period resulted from an increase in inventory of $23.1 million and
prepaid expenses of $1.2 million combined with a decrease of $5.6 million in
accrued and refundable income taxes. Offsetting this use of cash was
an increase in accounts payable of $10.6 million, net income of $22.7 million
and non-cash charges, including depreciation and amortization expense of $9.0
million and stock-based compensation expense of $3.2 million.
Investing
Activities.
Cash
used in investing activities in
the thirty-nine weeks ended November 3, 2007 totaled $10.4
million. Net purchases of short-term investments were $0.3 million
compared to net redemptions of short-term investments of $12.7 million as of
October 28, 2006. Capital expenditures used $10.2 million of cash in
the thirty-nine weeks ended November 3, 2007. We use cash in
investing activities to build new stores and remodel or relocate existing
stores. Furthermore, net cash used in investing activities includes
purchases of information technology assets and expenditures for our distribution
facility and corporate headquarters.
We
opened 44 new stores and relocated
and/or remodeled 10 existing stores during the thirty-nine weeks ended November
3, 2007 as compared to opening 49 new stores and relocating and/or remodeling
4
existing store during the thirty-nine weeks ended October 28, 2006.
We
estimate the cash outlay for capital
expenditures in fiscal 2008 will be approximately $18.5 million, which relates
to the opening of 86 to 90 new stores, remodeling of selected existing stores,
information technology upgrades and enhancements and various improvements at
our
headquarters and distribution center. Of the total budgeted dollars for capital
expenditures for fiscal 2008, we anticipate that approximately 76% will be
related to the opening of new stores and remodeling and or relocating existing
stores. Approximately 12% will be related to improvements in our
distribution center and on information technology with the remaining 12% related
primarily to loss prevention tools, office space improvements, information
technology, equipment and automobiles.
Financing
Activities.
Net
cash used in financing activities
was $24.8 million in the thirty-nine weeks ended November 3, 2007 compared
to
$25.5 million in the prior year period. The cash fluctuation as
compared to the same period last fiscal year was primarily the result of the
repurchase of our common stock. In the thirty-nine weeks ended
November 3, 2007 we expended $26.4 million on repurchases of our common stock
compared to $30.3 million for the thirty-nine weeks ended October 28,
2006. Financing activities also consisted of proceeds from
transactions in our common stock and the excess tax benefit from the exercise
of
incentive stock options. As stock options are exercised, we will
continue to receive proceeds and expect a tax deduction; however, the amounts
and timing cannot be predicted.
At
November 3, 2007, we had one
unsecured revolving credit facility that allows borrowings up to $30.0 million
and which renews annually in August. Under the provisions of this facility,
we
can draw down funds when our main operating account falls below $100,000. The
facility does not require a commitment or agency fee nor are there any covenant
restrictions. We plan to renew this facility as it expires and do not anticipate
any problems in doing so; however, no assurance can be given that we will be
granted a renewal or terms which are acceptable to us. As of November
3, 2007, we did not have any debt outstanding under this facility.
At
October 28, 2006, we had two
unsecured revolving credit facilities that allowed borrowings up to $15.0
million and $10.0 million and which renewed annually in
November. Under the provisions of these facilities, we could draw
down funds when our main operating account fell below
$100,000. Neither facility required a commitment or agency fee nor
were there any covenant restrictions. In November 2006, we renewed
the facility that allowed borrowings up to $15.0 million and elected not to
renew the second facility. As of October 28, 2006, we did not have
any debt outstanding under any of our facilities.
Based
on our current operating and
store opening plans and management’s plans for the repurchase of our common
stock, we believe that we can fund our cash needs for the foreseeable future
through cash generated from operations and, if necessary, through periodic
future borrowings against our credit facility.
Off-Balance
Sheet Arrangements
We
have not provided any financial
guarantees as of November 3, 2007.
We
have not created, and are not party
to, any special-purpose or off-balance sheet entities for the purpose of raising
capital, incurring debt or operating our business. We do not have any
arrangements or relationships with entities that are not consolidated into
the
financial statements.
22
Quarterly
and Seasonal Fluctuations
We
have historically experienced and
expect to continue to experience seasonal fluctuations in our net sales and
operating income. Our net sales and operating income are typically higher in
the
fourth quarter due to sales increases during the holiday selling season.
However, the seasonal fluctuations are mitigated by the strong product demand
in
the spring and back-to-school sales periods. Our quarterly results of operations
may also fluctuate significantly as a result of a variety of factors, including
the timing of new store openings, the occurrence and timing of tax holidays
within our states of operation, shifts in the retail calendar, the amount and
timing of net sales contributed by new stores, the level of pre-opening expenses
associated with new stores, the relative proportion of new stores to mature
stores, merchandise mix and demand for team-specific merchandise driven by
local
interest in various sporting events.
Our
financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows are subject to market risk from interest rate
fluctuations on our credit facility which bears an interest rate that varies
with LIBOR, prime or quoted cost of funds rates.
At
November 3, 2007, we did not have
any debt outstanding under our credit facility. There were three and
fifty-nine days during the thirteen and thirty-nine weeks ended November 3,
2007, respectively, where we incurred borrowings against our credit facility
for
an average borrowing of $2.9 million and $5.1 million,
respectively. The maximum borrowing was $5.8 million for the thirteen
weeks and $13.5 million for the thirty-nine weeks ended November 3, 2007 with
a
weighted-average interest rate of 6.05% for both periods.
At
October 28, 2006, we had no
borrowings outstanding under our credit facilities. There were two
days during the thirteen week period ended October 28, 2006 where we incurred
borrowings against our credit facilities for an average and maximum borrowing
of
$0.3 million and $0.4 million, respectively, and a weighted average interest
rate of 6.12%. There were twelve days during the thirty-nine week
period ended October 28, 2006, where we incurred borrowings against our credit
facilities for an average borrowing of approximately $1.7 million. Of
these twelve days, the maximum amount outstanding was approximately $3.3 million
and the weighted average interest rate was 6.12%.
A
10% increase or decrease in market
interest rates would not have a material impact on our financial condition,
results of operations or cash flows.
ITEM
4.
|
Evaluation
of Disclosure Controls and Procedures.
We
maintain disclosure controls and
procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed
in our Securities Exchange Act reports is recorded, processed, summarized and
reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange
Commission’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and
communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required
disclosure.
Our
Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer have evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation
of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act) as of November 3,
2007. Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer have concluded that, as of November 3, 2007, our disclosure
controls and procedures were effective.
Changes
in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting.
We
have not identified any changes in
our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period
ended November 3, 2007, that materially affected, or are reasonably likely
to
materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
23
PART
II. OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM
1.
|
In
October 2005, three former employees
filed a lawsuit in Mississippi federal court alleging negligence and various
violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). The violations
alleged that the Company improperly classified certain employees as exempt
salaried employees and that we owe back wages for overtime as a result of the
alleged misclassification. The suit asked the court to certify the
case as a collective action under the FLSA on behalf of all similarly situated
former and current employees. Plaintiffs sought to recover overtime
pay, liquidated damages, declaratory relief and attorneys’ fees. The
parties have negotiated a settlement and the court has ruled to certify the
collective action in accordance with the negotiated settlement.
While
we believe that these employees
are and have been properly classified as exempt employees under the FLSA and
that the actions described above are not appropriate for collective action
treatment, no assurances could be given that we would be successful in that
defense on the merits or otherwise, and, if unsuccessful, the resolution(s)
could have had a material adverse effect on our results of operations and our
financial statements as a whole in the period of resolution. At
November 3, 2007, we have estimated that the remaining liability related to
this
settlement is $600,000. Accordingly, we have accrued $600,000 as a
current liability on our condensed consolidated balance sheet. At
October 28, 2006, no loss amount was accrued because a loss was not considered
probable or estimable.
We
are also a party to other legal
actions and claims arising in the ordinary course of business. We
believe, based upon information currently available, that such other litigation
and claims, both individually and in the aggregate, will be resolved without
a
material effect on our results of operations and our financial statements as
a
whole in the period of resolution. However, litigation involves an
element of uncertainty and future developments could cause these actions or
claims to have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and our
financial statements as a whole in the period of resolution.
If
the Company believes that a loss is
both probable and estimable for a particular matter, the loss is accrued in
accordance with the requirements of SFAS No. 5. With respect to any
matter, we could change our belief as to whether a loss is probable or
estimable, or our estimate of loss, at any time. Even though we
may not believe a loss is probable or estimable, it is reasonably possible
that
we could suffer a loss with respect to that matter in the future.
ITEM
1A.
|
In
addition to the “Warning About
Forward-Looking Statements” in the introduction and other information set forth
in this report, you should carefully consider the disclosure in Part I, “Item
1A. Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended February 3, 2007, as filed on April 4, 2007 with the SEC, discussing
factors which could materially affect our business, financial condition or
future results. There have not been material changes in such factors
since such filing.
The
following table presents our stock
repurchase activity for the thirteen weeks ended November 3, 2007:
ISSUER
PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES (1)
Period
|
Total
Number of Shares Purchased
|
Average
Price per Share
|
Total
Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced
Programs
|
Approximate
Dollar Value of Shares that may yet be Purchased Under the Programs
(2)
|
||||||||
As
of August 4, 2007
|
5,033,813
|
$ |
23.46
|
5,033,813
|
$ |
31,914,000
|
||||||
August
5, 2007 to September 1, 2007
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
31,914,000
|
||||||||
September
2, 2007 to October 6, 2007
|
10,000
|
26.84
|
10,000
|
31,645,000
|
||||||||
October
7, 2007 to November 3, 2007
|
232,900
|
23.21
|
232,900
|
26,239,000
|
||||||||
Quarter
Ended November 3, 2007
|
242,900
|
23.36
|
242,900
|
|
||||||||
TOTAL
since inception
|
5,276,713
|
$ |
23.45
|
5,276,713
|
$ |
126,239,000
|
24
(1)
|
In
August 2004, the Board of Directors authorized a plan to repurchase
our
common stock. The Board of Directors has subsequently authorized
increases
to this plan with a current authorization effective August 2006 of
$150.0
million. The current authorization expires on February 2,
2008.
|
(2)
|
In
November 2007, the Board of Directors increased the maximum authorization
under such plan by $100.0 million to $250.0 million and extended
the
repurchase date through January 2010. Under this new
authorization, we have approximately $126.2 million available for
stock
repurchase as of November 3, 2007.
|
ITEM
3.
|
None.
None.
ITEM
5.
|
None.
ITEM
6.
|
Exhibit
No.
|
||
10.1
|
Credit
Agreement between the Company and Regions Bank, dated as of August
29,
2007; incorporated by reference as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Form
8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 29,
2007.
|
|
31.1
|
*
|
Rule
13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive
Officer
|
31.2
|
*
|
Rule
13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Financial
Officer
|
32.1
|
*
|
Section
1350 Certification of Chief Executive Officer
|
32.2
|
*
|
Section
1350 Certification of Chief Financial Officer
|
*
|
Filed
Within
|
25
Pursuant
to the requirements of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report
to
be signed on its behalf by the undersigned duly authorized.
HIBBETT
SPORTS, INC.
|
||
By:
|
/s/
Gary A. Smith
|
|
Gary
A. Smith
|
||
Vice
President & Chief Financial Officer
|
||
Date: December
13, 2007
|
(Principal
Financial Officer and Chief Accounting
Officer)
|
26
Exhibit
Index
Exhibit
No.
|
||
10.1
|
Credit
Agreement between the Company and Regions Bank, dated as of August
29,
2007; incorporated by reference as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Form
8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 29,
2007.
|
|
31.1
|
*
|
Rule
13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive
Officer
|
31.2
|
*
|
Rule
13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Financial
Officer
|
32.1
|
*
|
Section
1350 Certification of Chief Executive Officer
|
32.2
|
*
|
Section
1350 Certification of Chief Financial Officer
|
*
|
Filed
Within
|
27