HireQuest, Inc. - Quarter Report: 2017 March (Form 10-Q)
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
☑QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2017
OR
☐TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from to
Commission file number: 000-53088
COMMAND CENTER, INC.
(Exact
Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)
Washington
|
|
91-2079472
|
(State
of other jurisdiction of incorporation or
organization)
|
|
(I.R.S.
Employer Identification No.)
|
3609 S Wadsworth Blvd., Suite 250
Lakewood CO
|
|
80235
|
(Address
of Principal Executive Offices)
|
|
(Zip
Code)
|
(866) 464-5844
(Registrant's
Telephone Number, including Area Code).
Indicate
by check mark whether the Registrant (1) filed all reports required
to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period
that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has
been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes ☑ No ☐
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically
and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive
Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405
of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to submit and post such files).
Yes ☑ No ☐
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer,
an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, smaller reporting
company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of
“large accelerated filer,” “accelerated
filer”, “smaller reporting company” and "emerging
growth company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check
one):
Large accelerated filer
|
☐
|
Accelerated filer
|
☐
|
Non-accelerated
filer
|
☐
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
Smaller reporting company
|
☒
|
|
|
Emerging
growth company
|
☐
|
If an
emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant
has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying
with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided
pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.
☐
Indicate
by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined
in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act)
Yes ☐ No ☑
APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE ISSUERS:
Number
of shares of issuer's common stock outstanding at May
12, 2017:
60,634,650
FORM 10-Q
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
Page
|
|
|
|
|
Item 1.
|
Financial Statements
|
3
|
|
Consolidated Condensed Balance Sheets as of March 31, 2017 and
December 30, 2016
|
3
|
|
Consolidated Condensed Statements of Income for the Thirteen weeks
ended March 31, 2017 and March 25, 2016
|
4
|
|
Consolidated Condensed Statement of Changes in Stockholders’
Equity
|
5
|
|
Consolidated Condensed Statements of Cash Flows for the Thirteen
weeks ended March 31, 2017 and March 25, 2016
|
6
|
|
Notes to Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements
|
7
|
Item 2.
|
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations
|
15
|
Item 3.
|
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market
Risk
|
18
|
Item 4.
|
Controls and Procedures
|
18
|
|
|
|
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 1.
|
Legal Proceedings
|
18
|
Item 1A.
|
Risk Factors
|
18
|
Item 2.
|
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of
Proceeds
|
18
|
Item 3.
|
Default on Senior Securities
|
18
|
Item 4.
|
Mine Safety Disclosure
|
18
|
Item 5.
|
Other Information
|
18
|
Item 6.
|
Exhibits
|
19
|
Signatures
|
|
20
|
2
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
Command Center, Inc.
|
March
31,
|
December
30,
|
|
2017
|
2016
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
Current
Assets
|
|
|
Cash
|
$3,751,904
|
$3,022,741
|
Restricted
cash
|
1,469
|
24,676
|
Accounts
receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $918,270 and
$899,395, respectively
|
9,467,745
|
10,287,456
|
Prepaid expenses,
deposits, and other
|
571,633
|
631,873
|
Prepaid
workers’ compensation
|
280,790
|
745,697
|
Other
receivables
|
705,050
|
115,519
|
Current portion of
workers’ compensation risk pool deposits
|
404,312
|
404,327
|
Total
Current Assets
|
15,182,903
|
15,232,289
|
Property and
equipment, net
|
399,432
|
432,857
|
Deferred tax
asset
|
2,200,153
|
2,316,774
|
Workers’
compensation risk pool deposits, less current portion,
net
|
2,006,813
|
2,006,813
|
Goodwill and other
intangible assets, net
|
4,252,102
|
4,307,611
|
Total
Assets
|
$24,041,403
|
$24,296,344
|
Liabilities
and Stockholders’ Equity
|
|
|
Current
Liabilities
|
|
|
Accounts
payable
|
398,955
|
762,277
|
Checks issued and
payable
|
98,837
|
98,837
|
Other current
liabilities
|
482,403
|
297,089
|
Accrued wages and
benefits
|
1,428,349
|
1,567,585
|
Current portion of
workers’ compensation premiums and claims
liability
|
1,050,205
|
1,101,966
|
Total
Current Liabilities
|
3,458,749
|
3,827,754
|
Long-Term
Liabilities
|
|
|
Workers’
compensation claims liability, less current portion
|
1,526,441
|
1,604,735
|
Total
Liabilities
|
4,985,190
|
5,432,489
|
Commitments and
Contingencies (See Note 10)
|
|
|
Stockholders’
Equity
|
|
|
Preferred stock -
$0.001 par value, 5,000,000 shares authorized, none issued and
outstanding
|
-
|
-
|
Common stock -
100,000,000 shares, $0.001 par value, authorized; 60,634,650 shares
issued and outstanding
|
60,634
|
60,634
|
Additional
paid-in-capital
|
56,384,531
|
56,374,625
|
Accumulated
deficit
|
(37,388,952)
|
(37,571,404)
|
Total
Stockholders’ Equity
|
19,056,213
|
18,863,855
|
Total
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
|
$24,041,403
|
$24,296,344
|
|
||
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated
condensed financial statements.
|
3
Command Center, Inc.
Consolidated Condensed Statements of Income
(Unaudited)
|
Thirteen
|
Thirteen
|
|
Weeks
Ended
|
Weeks
Ended
|
|
March 31,
2017
|
March 25,
2016
|
Revenue
|
$22,348,249
|
$19,066,524
|
Cost of staffing
services
|
16,610,015
|
14,349,976
|
Gross
profit
|
5,738,234
|
4,716,548
|
Selling, general,
and administrative expenses
|
5,343,607
|
5,171,825
|
Depreciation and
amortization
|
95,550
|
39,334
|
Income (loss) from
operations
|
299,077
|
(494,611)
|
Interest expense
and other financing expense
|
4
|
40,381
|
Net income (loss)
before income taxes
|
299,073
|
(534,992)
|
Provision for
income taxes
|
116,621
|
3,769
|
Net income
(loss)
|
$182,452
|
$(538,761)
|
|
|
|
Earnings
per share:
|
|
|
Basic
|
$0.00
|
$(0.01)
|
Diluted
|
$0.00
|
$(0.01)
|
|
|
|
Weighted
average shares outstanding:
|
|
|
Basic
|
60,634,650
|
64,169,712
|
Diluted
|
61,365,419
|
64,169,712
|
|
|
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated
condensed financial statements.
|
4
Command Center, Inc.
Consolidated Condensed Statement of Changes in Stockholders’
Equity
(Unaudited)
|
Common
Stock
|
Additional
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
Par
Value
|
Paid-in-
Capital
|
Deficit
|
Total
|
Balance
at December 30, 2016
|
60,634,650
|
$60,634
|
$56,374,625
|
$(37,571,404)
|
$18,863,855
|
Stock-based
compensation expense
|
-
|
-
|
9,906
|
-
|
9,906
|
Net income for the
period
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
182,452
|
182,452
|
Balance
at March 31, 2017
|
60,634,650
|
$60,634
|
$56,384,531
|
$(37,388,952)
|
$19,056,213
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated
condensed financial statements.
|
5
Command Center, Inc.
Consolidated Condensed Statements of Cash Flows
(Unaudited)
|
Thirteen
|
Thirteen
|
|
Weeks
Ended
|
Weeks
Ended
|
|
March 31,
2017
|
March 25,
2016
|
Cash
flows from operating activities
|
|
|
Net income
(loss)
|
$182,452
|
$(538,761)
|
Adjustments to
reconcile net income to net cash provided by
operations:
|
|
|
Depreciation and
amortization
|
95,550
|
39,334
|
Bad debt
expense
|
18,875
|
29,267
|
Stock based
compensation
|
9,906
|
131,901
|
Deferred tax
asset
|
116,621
|
-
|
Changes in assets
and liabilities:
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
– trade
|
800,836
|
(392,522)
|
Prepaid
workers’ compensation
|
464,907
|
338,042
|
Other
receivables
|
-
|
(60,000)
|
Prepaid expenses,
deposits, and other
|
146,087
|
(40,478)
|
Workers’
compensation risk pool deposits
|
15
|
240,885
|
Accounts
payable
|
(363,322)
|
(55,560)
|
Checks issued and
payable
|
-
|
(280,325)
|
Other current
liabilities
|
185,314
|
(99,002)
|
Accrued wages and
benefits
|
(139,236)
|
(449,002)
|
Workers’
compensation premiums and claims liability
|
(130,055)
|
(667,220)
|
Net cash (used in)
provided by operating activities
|
1,387,950
|
(1,803,441)
|
Cash
flows from investing activities
|
|
|
Purchase of
property and equipment
|
(92,463)
|
(3,738)
|
Net cash used in
investing activities
|
(92,463)
|
(3,738)
|
Cash
flows from financing activities
|
|
|
Changes to account
purchase agreement facility
|
(589,531)
|
(479,616)
|
Purchase of
treasury stock
|
-
|
(220,499)
|
Net cash used in
financing activities
|
(589,531)
|
(700,115)
|
Net
increase (decrease) in cash
|
705,956
|
(2,507,294)
|
Cash
and restricted cash at beginning of period
|
3,047,417
|
7,629,424
|
Cash
and restricted cash at end of period
|
$3,753,373
|
$5,122,130
|
|
|
|
Supplemental
disclosure of cash flow information
|
|
|
Interest
paid
|
$4
|
$40,381
|
Income taxes
paid
|
$912
|
$3,769
|
|
|
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated
condensed financial statements.
|
6
Command Center, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements
NOTE 1 – BASIS OF
PRESENTATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The
accompanying unaudited consolidated condensed financial statements
have been prepared by Command Center, Inc. ("Command Center,”
the “Company,” “CCI,” “we,”
"us," or “our”) in accordance with U.S. generally
accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) for interim
financial reporting and rules and regulations of the Securities and
Exchange Commission. Accordingly, certain information and footnote
disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in
accordance with GAAP have been condensed or omitted. In the opinion
of our management, all adjustments, consisting of only normal
recurring accruals, necessary for a fair presentation of the
financial position, results of operations, and cash flows for the
fiscal periods presented have been included.
These
financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited
financial statements and related notes included in our Annual
Report filed on Form 10-K for the year ended December 30, 2016. The
results of operations for the thirteen weeks ended March 31, 2017
are not necessarily indicative of the results expected for the full
fiscal year, or for any other fiscal period.
Consolidation: The consolidated financial statements include
the accounts of Command Center and all of our wholly-owned
subsidiaries. All significant intercompany balances and
transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
Use of Estimates: The preparation of consolidated
financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires us to make
estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of
assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and
liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements
and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the
reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Significant estimates include the provision for doubtful accounts,
workers’ compensation risk pool deposits, and workers’
compensation claims liability.
Cash: Cash consists of demand deposits, including
interest-bearing accounts with original maturities of three months
or less, held in banking institutions and a trust
account.
Concentrations: At March 31, 2017, 11.4% of our revenue was
attributable to a single customer. No single customer represented
more than 10% of our revenue for the quarter ended March 25,
2016. At March 31, 2017,
two vendors accounted for 23.3% and 10.8% of our accounts payable
balance. At December 30,
2016, 20.6% of accounts payable were due to a single
vendor.
Fair Value Measures: Fair value is the price that would
be received to sell an asset, or paid to transfer a liability, in
the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or
liability in an ordinary transaction between market participants on
the measurement date. Our policy on fair value measures requires us
to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of
unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. The policy
establishes a fair value hierarchy based on the level of
independent, objective evidence surrounding the inputs used to
measure fair value. A financial instrument’s categorization
within the fair value hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of
input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The policy
prioritizes the inputs into three levels that may be used to
measure fair value:
Level
1: Applies to assets or liabilities for which there are quoted
prices in active markets for identical assets or
liabilities.
Level
2: Applies to assets or liabilities for which there are inputs
other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or
liability such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities
in active markets; quoted prices for identical assets or
liabilities in markets with insufficient volume or infrequent
transactions (less active markets); or model-derived valuations in
which significant inputs are observable or can be derived
principally from, or corroborated by, observable market
data.
Level
3: Applies to assets or liabilities for which there are
unobservable inputs to the valuation methodology that are
significant to the measurement of the fair value of the assets or
liabilities.
Our
financial instruments consist principally of a contingent
liability. For additional information see Note 10 – Commitments and
Contingencies.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements: In August 2014, the
Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued
Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2014-15 requiring
management to evaluate whether there are conditions or events,
considered in the aggregate, that raise substantial doubt about the
entity’s ability to continue as a going concern, which is
currently performed by the external auditors. Management is
required to perform this assessment for both interim and annual
reporting periods and must make certain disclosures if it concludes
that substantial doubt exists. This ASU was effective in the fourth
quarter of 2016. The adoption of this guidance did not have a
material effect on our financial statements.
7
In May
2014, the FASB issued new revenue recognition guidance under ASU
2014-09 that will supersede the existing revenue recognition
guidance under U.S. GAAP. The new standard focuses on creating a
single source of revenue guidance for revenue arising from
contracts with customers for all industries. The objective of the
new standard is for companies to recognize revenue when it
transfers the promised goods or services to its customers at an
amount that represents what the company expects to be entitled to
in exchange for those goods or services. In July 2015, the FASB
deferred the effective date by one year (ASU 2015-14). This ASU
will now be effective for annual periods, and interim periods
within those annual periods, beginning on or after December 15,
2017. Early adoption is permitted, but not before the original
effective date of December 15, 2016. Since the issuance of the
original standard, the FASB has issued several other subsequent
updates including the following: 1) clarification of the
implementation guidance on principal versus agent considerations
(ASU 2016-08); 2) further guidance on identifying performance
obligations in a contract as well as clarifications on the
licensing implementation guidance (ASU 2016-10); 3) rescission of
several SEC Staff Announcements that are codified in Topic 605 (ASU
2016-11); and 4) additional guidance and practical expedients in
response to identified implementation issues (ASU 2016-12). The new
standard will be effective for us beginning January 1, 2018 and we
expect to implement the standard with the modified retrospective
approach, which recognizes the cumulative effect of application
recognized on that date. We are evaluating the impact of adoption
on our consolidated results of operations, consolidated financial
position and cash flows.
In
February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02 amending the existing
accounting standards for lease accounting and requiring lessees to
recognize lease assets and lease liabilities for all leases with
lease terms of more than 12 months, including those classified as
operating leases. Both the asset and liability will initially be
measured at the present value of the future minimum lease payments,
with the asset being subject to adjustments such as initial direct
costs. Consistent with current U.S. GAAP, the presentation of
expenses and cash flows will depend primarily on the classification
of the lease as either a finance or an operating lease. The new
standard also requires additional quantitative and qualitative
disclosures regarding the amount, timing and uncertainty of cash
flows arising from leases in order to provide additional
information about the nature of an organization’s leasing
activities. This ASU is effective for annual periods, and interim
periods within those annual periods, beginning after December 15,
2018 and requires modified retrospective application. Early
adoption is permitted. We are currently evaluating the impact of
the new guidance on our consolidated financial statements and
related disclosures.
In
March 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2016-09
amending several aspects of share-based payment accounting. This
guidance requires all excess tax benefits and tax deficiencies to
be recorded in the income statement when the awards vest or are
settled, with prospective application required. The guidance also
changes the classification of such tax benefits or tax deficiencies
on the statement of cash flows from a financing activity to an
operating activity, with retrospective or prospective application
allowed. Additionally, the guidance requires the classification of
employee taxes paid when an employer withholds shares for
tax-withholding purposes as a financing activity on the statement
of cash flows, with retrospective application required. This ASU
was effective for the fourth quarter of 2016. The adoption of this
guidance did not have a material effect on our financial
statements.
In
March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-08, Revenue from Contracts
with Customers (Topic 606): Principal versus Agent Considerations
(Reporting Revenue Gross versus Net) (“ASU
2016-08”). ASU 2016-08 does not change the core principle of
Topic 606 but clarifies the implementation guidance on principal
versus agent considerations. ASU 2016-08 is effective for the
annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2017. We
are currently assessing the potential impact of ASU 2016-08 on our
consolidated financial statements and results of
operations.
In
November 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-18, “Statement of
Cash Flows (Topic 230) Restricted Cash.” The new guidance
requires that the reconciliation of the beginning-of-period and
end-of-period amounts shown in the statement of cash flows include
restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents. If restricted cash
is presented separately from cash and cash equivalents on the
balance sheet, companies will be required to reconcile the amounts
presented on the statement of cash flows to the amounts on the
balance sheet. Companies will also need to disclose information
about the nature of the restrictions. The guidance is effective for
fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, and the interim
periods within those fiscal years. The adoption of this guidance
did not have a material effect on our financial
statements.
Other
accounting standards that have been issued by the Financial
Accounting Standards Board or other standards-setting bodies are
not expected to have a material impact on our financial position,
results of operations and cash flows. For the period ended March
31, 2017, the adoption of other accounting standards had no
material impact on our financial positions, results of operations,
or cash flows.
8
NOTE 2 – EARNINGS PER SHARE
Basic
earnings per share is calculated by dividing net income or loss
available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of
common shares outstanding, and does not include the impact of any
potentially dilutive common stock equivalents. Diluted earnings per
share reflect the potential dilution of securities that could share
in our earnings through the conversion of common shares issuable
via outstanding stock options and stock warrants, except where
their inclusion would be anti-dilutive. Total outstanding common
stock equivalents at March 31, 2017 and March 25, 2016, were
2,366,500 and 3,633,500 respectively.
Diluted
common shares outstanding were calculated using the treasury stock
method and are as follows:
|
Thirteen
|
Thirteen
|
|
Weeks
Ended
|
Weeks
Ended
|
|
March 31,
2017
|
March 25,
2016
|
Weighted average
number of common shares used in basic net income per common
share
|
60,634,650
|
64,169,712
|
Dilutive effects of
stock options
|
730,769
|
-
|
Weighted average
number of common shares used in diluted net income per common
share
|
61,365,419
|
64,169,712
|
NOTE
3 – ACCOUNT
PURCHASE AGREEMENT & LINE OF CREDIT FACILITY
Our
current financing agreement is an account purchase agreement which
allows us to sell eligible accounts receivable for 90% of the
invoiced amount on a full recourse basis up to the facility
maximum, $14 million on March 31, 2017 and December 30, 2016. When
the account is paid by our customers, the remaining 10% is paid to
us, less applicable fees and interest. Eligible accounts receivable
are generally defined to include accounts that are not more than
ninety days past due.
Pursuant
to this agreement, at March 31, 2017, there was approximately
$703,000 that was owed to us and at December 30, 2016, there was
approximately $114,000 that was owed to us and included in Other
receivables on the Consolidated Condensed Balance
Sheet.
In May
2016, we signed a new account purchase agreement with our lender,
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. The current agreement bears interest at the
Daily One Month London Interbank Offered Rate plus 2.5% per annum.
At March 31, 2017, the effective interest rate was 3.5%. Interest
is payable on the actual amount advanced. Additional charges
include an annual facility fee equal to 0.50% of the facility
threshold in place and lockbox fees. As collateral for repayment of
any and all obligations, we granted Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. a
security interest in all of our property including, but not limited
to, accounts receivable, intangible assets, contract rights,
deposit accounts, and other such assets. Under our account purchase
agreement, our borrowing base is limited to 90% of acceptable
accounts as defined in the agreement, less the amount of
outstanding letters of credit. At March 31, 2017, the amount
available to us under the Wells Fargo agreement was approximately
$92,000.
As of
March 31, 2017, we had a $5.7 million letter of credit with Wells
Fargo that secures our obligations to our workers’
compensation insurance carrier and reduces the amount available to
us under the account purchase agreement. For additional information
related to this letter of credit see Note 6 – Workers’ Compensation
Insurance and Reserves. On April 7, 2017, this letter of
credit was increased to $6.0 million.
The
agreement requires that the sum of our unrestricted cash plus net
accounts receivable must at all times be greater than the sum of
the amount outstanding under the agreement plus accrued payroll and
accrued payroll taxes. At March 31, 2017, and December 30, 2016, we
were in compliance with this covenant.
NOTE 4 – ACQUISITION
On June
3, 2016, we purchased substantially all the assets of Hanwood
Arkansas, LLC, an Arkansas limited liability company, and Hanwood
Oklahoma, LLC, an Oklahoma limited liability company. Together
these companies operated as Hancock Staffing
(“Hancock”) from stores located in Little Rock,
Arkansas and Oklahoma City, Oklahoma. We acquired all of the assets
used in connection with the operation of the two staffing stores.
In addition, we assumed liabilities for future payments due under
the leases for the two stores, amounts owed on motor vehicles
acquired, and the amount due on their receivables factoring
line.
9
The
aggregate consideration paid for Hancock was $2,617,185, paid as
follows: (i) cash of $1,980,000; (ii) an unsecured one-year
holdback obligation of $220,000; and (iii) assumed liabilities of
$417,185.
In
connection with the acquisition of Hancock, we identified and
recognized an intangible asset of $659,564 representing customer
relationships and employment agreements/non-compete agreements. The
customer relationships are being amortized on a straight line basis
over their estimated life of four (4) years, the non-compete
agreement is amortized over its two-year term. During the quarter
ended March 31, 2017, we recognized amortization expense of
approximately $56,000. At March 31, 2017, the intangible asset
balance, net of accumulated amortization, was
$474,534.
The
final purchase accounting is still being finalized; however, the
following table summarizes the estimated fair values of the assets
acquired and liabilities assumed at the date of acquisition, which
have now been recorded in the financial statements as of March 31,
2017:
Assets:
|
|
Current
assets
|
$587,833
|
Fixed
assets
|
92,220
|
Intangible
assets
|
659,564
|
Goodwill
|
1,277,568
|
|
$2,617,185
|
Liabilities:
|
|
Current
liabilities
|
$637,185
|
Net purchase
price
|
$1,980,000
|
The
following table summarizes the pro forma operations had the
entities been acquired at the beginning of 2016 in the Consolidated
Statements of Income (in thousands):
|
Thirteen
|
|
Weeks
Ended
|
|
March 25,
2016
|
Revenue
|
$21,001
|
|
|
Net income before
income tax
|
$(13)
|
Income
tax
|
$101
|
Net
income
|
$(114)
|
NOTE 5 – GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS
Goodwill
and other intangible assets are stated net of accumulated
amortization. The following table summarizes the goodwill and
intangible asset balances:
|
March
31,
2017
|
December
30,
2016
|
Goodwill
|
$3,777,568
|
$3,777,568
|
Intangible
assets
|
659,564
|
659,564
|
Accumulated
amortization
|
(185,030)
|
(129,521)
|
Goodwill and other intangible assets, net |
$4,252,102
|
$4,307,611
|
Total
amortization expense for the thirteen weeks ended March 31, 2017
was $55,509. There was no amortization expense for the thirteen
weeks ended March 25, 2016.
NOTE 6 – WORKERS' COMPENSATION INSURANCE AND
RESERVES
On
April 1, 2014, we changed our workers’ compensation carrier
to ACE American Insurance Company (“ACE”) in all states
in which we operate other than Washington and North Dakota. The ACE
insurance policy is a large deductible policy where we have primary
responsibility for all claims made. ACE provides insurance for
covered losses and expenses in excess of $500,000 per incident.
Under this high deductible program, we are largely self-insured.
Per our contractual agreements with ACE, we must provide a
collateral deposit of $6.0 million, which is accomplished through a
letter of credit under our Account Purchase Agreement with Wells
Fargo. For workers’ compensation claims originating in
Washington and North Dakota, we pay workers’ compensation
insurance premiums and obtain full coverage under mandatory state
government administered programs. Generally, our liability
associated with claims in these jurisdictions is limited to the
payment of premiums. In the past, we also obtained full coverage in
the state of New York under a policy issued by the State Fund of
New York. Accordingly, our consolidated financial statements
reflect only the mandated workers’ compensation insurance
premium liability for workers’ compensation claims in these
jurisdictions.
From
April 1, 2012 to March 31, 2014, our workers’ compensation
carrier was Dallas National Insurance in all states in which we
operate other than Washington, North Dakota and New York. The
Dallas National coverage was a large deductible policy where we
have primary responsibility for claims under the policy. Dallas
National provided insurance for covered losses and expenses in
excess of $350,000 per incident. Per our contractual agreements
with Dallas National, we made payments into, and maintain a balance
of $1.8 million as a non-depleting deposit as collateral for our
self-insured claims. During the period, Dallas National arranged
with Companion Insurance (now Sussex Insurance) to underwrite
coverage in California and South Dakota. As a result of this
arrangement, Sussex Insurance continues to hold a collateral
deposit advanced by us of $215,00.
10
From
April 1, 2011 to March 31, 2012, our workers’ compensation
coverage was obtained through Zurich American Insurance Company
(“Zurich”). The policy with Zurich was a guaranteed
cost plan under which all claims are paid by Zurich. Zurich
provided workers’ compensation coverage in all states in
which we operate other than Washington and North
Dakota.
Prior
to Zurich, we maintained workers’ compensation policies
through AMS Staff Leasing II (“AMS”) for coverage in
the non-monopolistic jurisdictions in which we operate. The AMS
coverage was a large deductible policy where we have primary
responsibility for claims under the policy. Under the AMS policies,
we made payments into a risk pool fund to cover claims within our
self-insured layer. Per our contractual agreements for this
coverage, we were originally required to maintain a deposit in the
amount of $500,000. At March 31, 2017, our deposit with AMS was
approximately $480,000.
For the
two-year period prior to May 13, 2008, our workers’
compensation coverage was obtained through policies issued by AIG.
At March 31, 2017, our risk pool deposit with AIG was approximately
$400,000.
As part
of our large deductible workers’ compensation programs, our
carriers require that we collateralize a portion of our future
workers’ compensation obligations in order to secure future
payments made on our behalf. This collateral is typically in the
form of cash and cash equivalents. At March 31, 2017 and December
30, 2016, we had net cash collateral deposits of approximately $2.4
million. With the addition of the $5.7 million letter of credit,
our cash and non-cash collateral totaled approximately $8.1 million
at March 31, 2017. The letter of credit increased to $6.0 million
on April 7, 2017. The workers’ compensation risk pool
deposits total $2.4 million as of March 31, 2017, consisting of a
current portion of $0.4 million and a long-term portion of $2.0
million. The long-term portion of the risk pool deposits is net of
an allowance of $0.5 million, which is determined to be impaired.
This allowance is to reserve for the possibility that we would not
recover all of our risk pool deposits that we placed with our
former workers’ compensation insurance carrier, Freestone
Insurance (formerly Dallas National Insurance Company). Freestone
Insurance was placed in receivership by the State of Delaware in
2014. We continue to believe that we have a priority claim for the
return of our collateral. However, the amount that will ultimately
be returned to us is still uncertain. See Note 10 – Commitments and
Contingencies, for additional information on cash collateral
provided to Freestone Insurance Company.
Workers’
compensation expense for temporary workers is recorded as a
component of our cost of services and consists of the following
components: changes in our self-insurance reserves as determined by
our third party actuary, actual claims paid, insurance premiums and
administrative fees, and premiums paid in monopolistic
jurisdictions. Workers’ compensation expense for our
temporary workers totaled approximately $0.8 million for each of
the thirteen week periods ended March 31, 2017 and March 25,
2016.
The
workers’ compensation risk pool deposits are classified as
current and non-current assets on the consolidated balance sheet
based upon management’s estimate of when the related claims
liabilities will be paid. The deposits have not been discounted to
present value in the accompanying consolidated financial
statements. All liabilities associated with our workers’
compensation claims are fully reserved on our consolidated balance
sheet.
NOTE 7 – STOCK BASED COMPENSATION
Employee Stock Incentive Plan: Our 2008 Stock
Incentive Plan expired in January 2016. Outstanding awards continue
to remain in effect according to the terms of the plan and the
award documents. The 2008 Stock Incentive Plan permitted the grant
of up to 6.4 million stock options in order to motivate, attract
and retain the services of employees, officers and directors, and
to provide an incentive for outstanding performance. Pursuant to
awards under this plan, there were 2,104,000 and 1,860,500 vested
at March 31, 2017 and December 30, 2016, respectively. As of March
31, 2017, we had one equity compensation plan, namely the
Command Center, Inc. 2016 Stock
Incentive Plan, approved by the shareholders on November 17,
2016. Pursuant to the 2016 Plan, the Compensation Committee is
authorized to issue awards for up to 6.0 million shares over the 10
year life of the plan. Currently, there have been no awards granted
under this plan.
11
The
following table summarizes our stock options outstanding at
December 30, 2016 and changes during the period ended March 31,
2017:
|
Number
of
|
Weighted
Average
|
Weighted
Average
|
|
Shares
Under
|
Exercise
Price
|
Grant Date
Fair
|
|
Options
|
Per
Share
|
Value
|
Outstanding
December 30, 2016
|
2,498,000
|
$0.36
|
$0.24
|
Granted
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Forfeited
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Expired
|
(131,500)
|
0.41
|
0.33
|
Exercised
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Outstanding March
31, 2017
|
2,366,500
|
$0.36
|
$0.23
|
The
following table summarizes our non-vested stock options outstanding
at December 30, 2016, and changes during the period ended March 31,
2017:
|
|
Weighted
Average
|
Weighted
Average
|
|
Number
of
|
Exercise
Price
|
Grant Date
Fair
|
|
Options
|
Per
Share
|
Value
|
Non-vested December
30, 2016
|
637,500
|
$0.40
|
$0.27
|
Granted
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Vested
|
(375,000)
|
0.13
|
0.10
|
Forfeited
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Non-vested March
31, 2017
|
262,500
|
$0.69
|
$0.37
|
The
following table summarizes information about our stock options
outstanding, and reflects the intrinsic value recalculated based on
the closing price of our common stock at March 31,
2017:
|
|
|
Weighted
Average
|
|
|
|
Weighted
Average
|
Remaining
|
Aggregate
|
|
Number of
Shares
|
Exercise
Price
|
Contractual
Life
|
Intrinsic
|
|
Under
Options
|
Per
Share
|
(years)
|
Value
|
Outstanding
|
2,366,500
|
$0.36
|
5.08
|
$279,000
|
Exercisable
|
2,104,000
|
$0.32
|
5.14
|
$279,000
|
Options Outstanding
|
|
Options Exercisable
|
||||||
Range of exercise prices
|
|
Number of Shares Outstanding
|
|
Weighted Average Contractual Life
|
|
Number of Shares Exercisable
|
|
Weighted Average Contractual Life
|
0.20 – 0.41
|
|
1,686,500
|
|
3.75
|
|
1,686,500
|
|
4.22
|
0.67 – 0.73
|
|
680,000
|
|
1.33
|
|
417,500
|
|
0.92
|
|
|
2,366,500
|
|
5.08
|
|
2,104,000
|
|
5.14
|
Under
the employment agreement entered into with our CFO on September 2,
2016, we are obligated to award to her unvested options to acquire
500,000 shares of Command Center common stock. When granted, the
options will vest in four equal installments of 125,000 shares
each. As of March 31, 2017, and also as of the date of this report,
the options have not yet been granted.
NOTE 8 – STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Stock Repurchase: In April 2015, the Board of
Directors authorized a $5.0 million three year repurchase of our
common stock. During the thirteen weeks ended March 31, 2017, we
did not purchase any shares of common under the plan. We have
approximately $2.1 million remaining under the plan.
12
NOTE 9 – INCOME TAX
Deferred
income taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences
between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for
financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax
purposes. Significant components of our deferred taxes generally
consists of net operating loss, accrued vacation, workers’
compensation claims liability, depreciation, bad debt reserve,
deferred rent, stock compensation, charitable contributions, AMT
credit, and other accruals.
NOTE 10 – COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
We
presently lease office space for our corporate headquarters in
Lakewood, Colorado. In April 2015, we executed the lease on this
facility for a sixty-four month term, beginning September 1, 2015
and expiring December 31, 2020, with an option to renew for two
additional five-year extensions. We currently pay approximately
$11,142 per month for our office space with annual increases of
approximately 3% which include typical triple net charges for
property taxes, insurance and maintenance. We own all of the office
furniture and equipment used in our corporate
headquarters.
We also
lease the facilities for all of our store locations. All of these
facilities are leased at market rates that vary in amount depending
on location. Each store is between 1,000 and 5,000 square feet,
depending on location and market conditions.
Operating leases: We lease store facilities,
vehicles, and equipment. Most of our store leases have terms that
extend over three to five years. Some of the leases have
cancellation provisions that allow us to cancel with 90 days'
notice. Other leases have been in existence long enough that the
term has expired and we are currently occupying the premises on
month-to-month tenancies. Minimum lease obligations for the next
five fiscal years as of March 31, 2017, are:
|
Operating
Lease
|
Year
|
Obligation
|
2017 (9
months)
|
$619,324
|
2018
|
585,774
|
2019
|
385,785
|
2020
|
217,950
|
2021
|
-
|
Thereafter
|
-
|
|
$1,808,833
|
Total
lease expense for each of the fiscal quarters ended March 31, 2017
and March 25, 2016, was approximately $0.4 million.
Legal Proceedings: From time to time we are involved in
various legal proceedings. We believe that the outcome of these
proceedings, even if determined adversely, will not have a material
adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of
operations. There have been no material changes in our legal
proceedings since March 31, 2017.
Freestone Insurance Company Liquidation: For the
two-year period prior to April 1, 2014, our workers’
compensation insurance coverage was provided by Dallas National
Insurance under a high deductible policy in which we are
responsible for the first $350,000 per incident. During this time
period, Dallas National changed its corporate name to Freestone
Insurance Company. Under the terms of the policy we were required
to provide cash collateral of $900,000 per year for a total of $1.8
million, as a non-depleting fund to secure our payment of
anticipated claims up to the policy deductible. We are ultimately
responsible for paying costs of claims that occur during the term
of the policy, up to the deductible amount. In January 2014,
Freestone Insurance provided written confirmation to us that it
continued to hold $1.8 million of Command funds as collateral and
stated that an additional $200,000 was held at another insurance
provider for a total of $2.0 million. In April 2014, the State of
Delaware placed Freestone Insurance in receivership due to concerns
about its financial condition. On August 15, 2014, the receivership
was converted to a liquidation proceeding. The receiver distributed
pending individual claims for workers’ compensation benefits
to the respective state guaranty funds for administration. In many
cases, the state guaranty funds have made payments directly to the
claimants. In other situations we have continued to pay claims that
are below the deductible level and we are not aware of any pending
claims from this time period that exceed or are likely to exceed
our deductible.
From
about July 1, 2008 until April 1, 2011, in most states our
workers’ compensation coverage was provided under an
agreement with AMS Staff Leasing II, through a master policy with
Dallas National. During this time period, we deposited
approximately $500,000 with an affiliate of Dallas National for
collateral related to the coverage through AMS Staff Leasing II.
Claims that remain open from this time period have also been
distributed by the receiver to the state guaranty funds. In one
instance, the State of Minnesota has denied liability for payment
of a workers’ compensation claim that arose in 2010 and is in
excess of our deductible. In the first quarter of 2016 we settled
the individual workers’ compensation case and we ultimately
withdrew our legal challenge to the state's denial of
liability.
13
During
the second quarter of 2015, the receiver requested court
authorization to disburse funds to the state guaranty funds. We and
other depositors of collateral with Freestone objected and asked
the court to block the disbursements until a full accounting of the
assets and liabilities of Freestone is provided. Distribution of
funds by the receiver to the state guaranty funds remains on hold.
As a result of these developments, during the second quarter of
2015 and the first quarter of 2016 we recorded reserves of $250,000
on the deposit balance, for a total reserve of $500,000. We review
these deposits at each balance sheet date and as of March 31, 2017,
we did not need to make an adjustment to our deposit
balance.
On July
5, 2016, the receiver filed the First Accounting for the period
April 28, 2014 through December 31, 2015, with the Delaware Court
of Chancery. The First Accounting does not clarify the issues with
respect to the collateral claims, priorities and return of
collateral. In the accounting, the Receiver reports total assets
consisting of cash and cash equivalents of $87.7 million as of
December 31, 2015.
In late
2015, we filed timely proofs of claim with the receiver. One proof
of claim is filed as a priority claim seeking return of the full
amount of our collateral deposits. The other proof of claim is a
general claim covering non-collateral items. We believe that our
claim to the return of our collateral is a priority claim in the
liquidation proceeding and that our collateral should be returned
to us. However, if it is ultimately determined that our claim is
not a priority claim or if there are insufficient assets in the
liquidation to satisfy the priority claims, we may not receive any
or all of our collateral.
In
April 2017, the Chancery Court in the state of Delaware entered an
order directing the receiver to file the collateral procedure
petition with the court on or before Friday, May 26, 2017. The
collateral procedure petition is described in the order as a
“petition to seek approval of the procedure for administering
claims against the Freestone estate for collateral allegedly held
by Freestone.”
NOTE 11 – SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
14
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations
Forward Looking Statements: This Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q contains “forward-looking statements” within the
meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.
Forward-looking statements include statements regarding industry
trends, our future financial position and performance, business
strategy, revenues and expenses in future periods, projected levels
of growth and other matters that do not relate strictly to
historical facts. These statements are often identified by words
such as “may,” “will,” “seeks,”
“anticipates,” “believes,”
“estimates,” “expects,”
“projects,” “forecasts,”
“plans,” “intends,” “continue,”
“could,” “should” or similar expressions or
variations. These statements are based on the beliefs and
expectations of our management based on information currently
available. Such forward-looking statements are not guarantees of
future performance and are subject to risks and uncertainties that
could cause actual results to differ materially from those
contemplated by forward-looking statements. Important factors
currently known to our management that could cause or contribute to
such differences include, but are not limited to, those referenced
in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 30,
2016 under Item 1A “Risk Factors.” We undertake no
obligation to update any forward-looking statements as a result of
new information, future events or otherwise.
Overview
We are
a staffing company operating primarily in the manual on-demand
labor segment of the staffing industry. Our customers range in size
from small businesses to large corporations. All of our field team
members are employed by us. Most of our work assignments are short
term, and many are filled with little notice from our customers. In
addition to short and longer term temporary work assignments, we
recruit and place workers in temp-to-hire positions.
At May
12, 2017, we owned
and operated 65 on-demand labor stores in 21
states.
Results of Operations
The
following table reflects operating results for the thirteen week
period ended March 31, 2017 compared to the thirteen week period
ended March 25, 2016 (in thousands, except per share amounts and
percentages) and serves as the basis for the narrative that
follows. Percentages indicate line items as a percentage of total
revenue.
|
Thirteen weeks
ended
|
Thirteen weeks
ended
|
||
|
March 31 ,
2017
|
March 25,
2016
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating
revenue
|
$22,348
|
|
$19,067
|
|
Cost of staffing
services
|
16,610
|
74.3%
|
14,350
|
75.3%
|
Gross
Profit
|
5,738
|
25.7%
|
4,717
|
24.7%
|
Selling, general,
and administrative expenses
|
5,343
|
23.9%
|
5,172
|
27.1%
|
Depreciation and
amortization
|
96
|
0.4%
|
40
|
0.2%
|
Income (loss) from
operations
|
299
|
1.3%
|
(495)
|
(2.6%)
|
Interest expense
and other financing expense
|
-
|
0.0%
|
40
|
0.2%
|
Net income (loss)
before taxes
|
299
|
1.3%
|
(535)
|
(2.8%)
|
Provision for
income taxes
|
117
|
0.5%
|
4
|
0.0%
|
Net income
(loss)
|
$182
|
0.8%
|
$(539)
|
(2.8%)
|
Non-GAAP
data
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA
|
$395
|
1.8%
|
$(455)
|
(2.4%)
|
Adjusted
EBITDA
|
$405
|
1.8%
|
$(73)
|
(0.4%)
|
Use of non-GAAP Financial Measures
Earnings
before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, or EBITDA,
is a non-GAAP measure that represents net income attributable to us
before interest expense, income tax (benefit) expense, depreciation
and amortization. Adjusted earnings before interest, taxes,
depreciation and amortization, non-cash compensation, and certain
non-recurring expenses, or Adjusted EBITDA, is a non-GAAP measure
that represents net income attributable to us before interest
expense, income tax (benefit) expense, depreciation and
amortization, non-cash compensation and certain non-recurring
expenses, including reserve for workers’ compensation
deposit. We utilize EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA as financial
measures as management believes investors find them to be useful
tools to perform more meaningful comparisons of past, present and
future operating results and as a means to evaluate our results of
operations. We believe these metrics are useful complements to net
income and other financial performance measures. EBITDA and
Adjusted EBITDA are not intended to represent net income as defined
by U.S. GAAP, and such information should not be considered as an
alternative to net income or any other measure of performance
prescribed by GAAP.
15
We use
EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA to measure our financial performance
because we believe interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization,
non-cash compensation and certain non-recurring charges, including
a reserve for workers’ compensation deposit, bear little or
no relationship to our operating performance. By excluding interest
expense, EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA measure our financial
performance irrespective of our capital structure or how we finance
our operations. By excluding taxes on income, we believe EBITDA and
Adjusted EBITDA provide a basis for measuring the financial
performance of our operations excluding factors that our stores
cannot control. By excluding depreciation and amortization expense,
EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA measure the financial performance of our
operations without regard to their historical cost. By excluding
stock based compensation, Adjusted EBITDA provides a basis for
measuring the financial performance of our operations. In addition,
by excluding certain nonrecurring charges, Adjusted EBITDA provides
a basis for measuring financial performance without unusual
nonrecurring charges. For all of these reasons, we believe that
EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA provide us and investors with
information that is relevant and useful in evaluating our
business.
However,
because EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA exclude depreciation and
amortization, they do not measure the capital we require to
maintain or preserve our fixed assets. In addition, EBITDA and
Adjusted EBITDA do not reflect interest expense, and do not take
into account the total amount of interest we pay on outstanding
debt, nor do they show trends in interest costs due to changes in
our financing or changes in interest rates. EBITDA and Adjusted
EBITDA, as defined by us, may not be comparable to EBITDA and
Adjusted EBITDA as reported by other companies that do not define
EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA exactly as we define those terms.
Because we use EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA to evaluate our financial
performance, we reconcile them to net income, which is the most
comparable financial measure calculated and presented in accordance
with GAAP.
The
following is a reconciliation of net income to EBITDA and Adjusted
EBITDA (in thousands) for the periods presented:
|
Thirteen
|
Thirteen
|
|
Weeks
Ended
|
Weeks
Ended
|
|
March 31,
2017
|
March 25,
2016
|
Net income
(loss)
|
$182
|
$(539)
|
Adjustments:
|
|
|
Interest expense
and other financing expense
|
-
|
40
|
Depreciation and
amortization
|
96
|
40
|
Provision for
income taxes
|
117
|
4
|
EBITDA
|
395
|
(455)
|
Non-cash
compensation
|
10
|
132
|
Reserve for
workers’ compensation deposit
|
-
|
250
|
Adjusted
EBITDA
|
$405
|
$(73)
|
Thirteen Weeks Ended March 31, 2017, compared to the Thirteen Weeks
Ended March 25, 2016
Summary of Operations: Revenue for the thirteen weeks ended
March 31, 2017, was $22.3 million, an increase of approximately
$3.2 million or 17.2%, from $19.1 million for the thirteen weeks
ended March 25, 2016.
On June
3, 2016, we acquired the assets of Hancock. For the quarter ended
March 31, 2017, revenue from the Hancock stores was approximately
$1.7 million or 7.5% of our revenue for the fiscal quarter. Revenue
for the quarter ended March 31, 2017, from our stores in North
Dakota increased $63,000 or 3.3% to $2.0 million from $1.9 million
for the quarter ended March 25, 2016. Revenue from our remaining
stores (excluding Hancock and North Dakota) for the quarter ended
March 31, 2017, was $18.7 million, an increase of $1.6 million or
9.0% compared to the quarter ended March 25, 2016.
Cost of Staffing Services: Cost of staffing services for the
thirteen weeks ended March 31, 2017, was $16.6 million, an increase
of approximately $2.2 million or 15.7%, from $14.4 million for the
thirteen weeks ended March 25, 2016. The increase in cost of
staffing services coincides with our increase in revenue described
above.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses, or SG&A:
SG&A expenses for the thirteen weeks ended March 31, 2017,
increased to $5.3 million from $5.2 million for the thirteen weeks
ended March 25, 2016. As a percentage of revenue, SG&A expenses
for the thirteen weeks ended March 31, 2017, was 23.9% compared to
27.1% for the thirteen weeks ended March 25, 2016. The primary
drivers for the decrease as a percentage of revenue were a decrease
in salaries expense as a percentage of revenue of approximately 1%,
despite salaries expense increasing by approximately $200,000,
stock based compensation decrease as a percentage of revenue by
approximately 1%, or $120,000, and office expenses decrease as a
percentage of revenue by approximately 1%, or
$100,000.
16
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Operating Activities: Cash provided by operating
activities totaled $1.4 million during the thirteen weeks ended
March 31, 2017, as compared to cash used by activities of
approximately $1.8 million for the corresponding thirteen week
period in 2016. The significant changes in cash provided by
operating activities include the net income for the thirteen weeks
ended March 31, 2016, of approximately $182,000 compared to the net
loss of approximately $539,000 for the prior year. Accounts
receivable decreased approximately $801,000 during the thirteen
week period ended March 31, 2017, compared to a $393,000 increase
in 2016. Prepaid workers’ compensation decreased
approximately $465,000 during the thirteen week period ended March
31, 2017, compared to a decrease of approximately $338,000 in 2016.
Uses of cash in operating activities during the thirteen weeks
ended March 31, 2017, included approximately $363,000 in accounts
payable, $139,000 in accrued wages and benefits, and $130,000 in
workers’ compensation premiums and claims liability. Cash
used in operating activities during the corresponding thirteen
weeks in 2016 included approximately $280,000 checks issued and
payable, $449,000 accrued wages and benefits, and $667,000
workers’ compensation premiums and claims
liability.
Investing Activities: Cash used in investing
activities totaled approximately $92,000 for the thirteen weeks
ended March 31, 2017 compared to $4,000 in 2016. In both periods
cash was used to purchase additional property and
equipment.
Financing Activities: Cash used in financing activities
totaled approximately $590,000 and $700,000 during the first
thirteen weeks of 2017 and 2016, respectively, and in both periods
these uses of cash relate to a reduction in the amount outstanding
in our account purchase agreement with Wells Fargo. In addition, we
purchased and retired approximately $220,000 in treasury stock
during the first quarter of 2016. There were no purchases of
treasury stock in the first quarter of 2017.
17
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market
Risk
Command
Center is a “smaller reporting company” as defined by
Regulation S-K and as such, is not providing the information
contained in this item pursuant to Regulation S-K.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
(a)
Evaluation of disclosure controls
and procedures. Our Chief Executive Officer and the Chief
Financial Officer evaluated our disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities
and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), prior to
the filing of this Form 10-Q. Based on that evaluation, our CEO and
CFO concluded that, as of March 31, 2017, our disclosure controls
and procedures were effective.
(b)
Changes in internal controls over
financial reporting. There have not been any changes in our
internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended
March 31, 2017, which have materially affected, or are reasonably
likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial
reporting.
PART II. OTHER
INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
From
time to time we are involved in various legal proceedings. We
believe that the outcome of these proceedings, even if determined
adversely, will not have a material adverse effect on our business,
financial condition or results of operations.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
Except
as discussed below, there have been no material changes from the
risk factors we previously disclosed in our annual report on Form
10-K for the year ended December 30, 2016 filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on April 11, 2017.
We rely on a number of key customers and if we lose any one of
these customers, our revenues may decline.
Although
we have a significant number of customers in each of the geographic
markets that we operate in, we rely on certain key customers for a
significant portion of our revenues. At March 31, 2017, one
customer represented 11.4% of revenues. In the future, a small
number of customers may represent a significant portion of our
total revenues in any given period. These customers may not
consistently use our services at a particular rate over any
subsequent period. The loss of any of these customers could
adversely affect our revenues.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of
Proceeds
None
Item 3. Default on Senior Securities
In the
quarter ended March 31, 2017, we did not issue any unregistered
securities.
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosure
Not
applicable.
Item 5. Other Information
None.
18
Item 6. Exhibits
Exhibit No.
|
|
Description
|
10.1
|
|
Account
Purchase Agreement by and between Command Center, Inc. and Wells
Fargo Bank. N.A., dated May 12, 2016.
|
|
Certification
of Frederick Sandford, Chief Executive Officer of Command Center,
Inc. pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) as adopted pursuant to Section 302
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
|
Certification
of Colette Pieper, Chief Financial Officer of Command Center, Inc.
pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
|
Certification
of Frederick Sandford, Chief Executive Officer of Command Center,
Inc. pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted in Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
|
Certification
of Colette Pieper, Chief Financial Officer of Command Center, Inc.
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted in Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
101.INS
|
|
XBRL
Instance Document
|
101.SCH
|
|
XBRL
Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
|
101.CAL
|
|
XBRL
Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
|
101.DEF
|
|
XBRL
Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
|
101.LAB
|
|
XBRL
Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
|
101.PRE
|
|
XBRL
Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document
|
____________________
19
Signatures
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf
by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized
Command Center, Inc.
/s/ Frederick Sandford
|
|
President
and CEO
|
|
Frederick
Sandford
|
|
May 15,
2017
|
Signature
|
|
Title
|
|
Printed
Name
|
|
Date
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Colette Pieper
|
|
Principal
Accounting Officer
|
|
Colette
Pieper
|
|
May 15,
2017
|
Signature
|
|
Title
|
|
Printed
Name
|
|
Date
|
20