HireQuest, Inc. - Annual Report: 2018 (Form 10-K)
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
☑
|
ANNUAL
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF 1934
|
|
For the fiscal year ended December 28, 2018
or
☐
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
Commission file number: 000-53088
COMMAND CENTER, INC.
|
(Exact
Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)
|
Washington
|
|
91-2079472
|
(State
of other jurisdiction of incorporation or
organization)
|
|
(I.R.S.
Employer Identification No.)
|
3609 S. Wadsworth Blvd., Suite 250, Lakewood, CO
|
|
80235
|
(Address
of Principal Executive Offices)
|
|
(Zip
Code)
|
Registrant’s
Telephone Number, including Area Code: (866) 464-5844
|
|
Securities
Registered Pursuant to Section 12(b) of the
Act: None
|
|
Securities
Registered Pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: Common
Stock, par value $0.001
|
(Title
of Class)
|
Indicate
by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as
defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ☐
No☑
|
|
Indicate
by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports
pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.
Yes ☐ No☑
|
|
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such
shorter period that the registrant was required to file such
reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for
the past 90 days. Yes ☑ No ☐
|
|
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically
every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to
Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 229.405 of this chapter) during
the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to submit such files). Yes ☑
No ☐
|
|
Indicate by check
mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of
Regulation S-K (§229.405 of this chapter) is not contained
herein, and will not be contained, to the best of
registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information
statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K
or any amendment to this Form
10-K. ☐
|
|
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated
filer ☐ , accelerated filer ☐ ,
non-accelerated filer ☐ , smaller reporting
company ☑ , or an emerging growth
company ☐ (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange
Act).
|
|
If an
emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant
has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying
with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided
pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange
Act. ☐
|
|
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined
in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).
Yes ☐·No☑
|
|
The
aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity
held by non-affiliates, computed by reference to the price at which
the common equity was last sold, as of the last business day of the
second fiscal quarter, June 29, 2018, was approximately
$16,500,000.
|
As of
April 9, 2019, there were 4,629,331 common shares of the
registrant’s common stock outstanding.
The
following document is incorporated by reference into Parts I, II,
III, and IV of this report: None.
|
Command Center, Inc.
2018 Annual Report on Form 10-K
Table of Contents
|
|
Page
|
3
|
||
6
|
||
12
|
||
12
|
||
12
|
||
14
|
||
|
|
|
14
|
||
15
|
||
15
|
||
19
|
||
20
|
||
37
|
||
37
|
||
37
|
||
|
|
|
39
|
||
45
|
||
48
|
||
50
|
||
50
|
||
|
|
|
51
|
||
51
|
||
|
52
|
Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
This
Annual Report on Form 10-K (this "Form 10-K") may contain
forward-looking statements. These statements relate to our
expectations for future events and future financial performance.
Generally, the words “intend,” “expect,”
“anticipate,” “estimate,” or
“continue” and similar expressions identify
forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements involve
risks and uncertainties, and future events and circumstances could
differ significantly from those anticipated in the forward-looking
statements. These statements are only predictions. In addition to
other factors discussed in this Form 10-K,
some of the important factors that could cause actual results to
differ from those discussed in the forward-looking statements
include risk factors described in Item 1A of this Form 10-K.
Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these
forward-looking statements. Although we believe that the
expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are
reasonable, we cannot guarantee future results, levels of activity,
performance or achievements. Our expectations, beliefs, or
projections may not be achieved or accomplished. We do not, nor
have we authorized any other person to, assume responsibility for
the accuracy and completeness of the forward-looking statements. We
undertake no duty to update any of the forward-looking statements
after the date of this Form 10-K,
whether as a result of new information, future events, or
otherwise, except as required by law. You are advised to consult
further disclosures we may make on related subjects in our filings
with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or the
SEC.
PART I
Item 1. Business
Introduction and General Background
Command
Center, Inc. ("Command Center,” the “Company,”
“CCI,” “we,” "us," or “our”) is
a staffing company, operating primarily in the manual on-demand
labor segment of the staffing industry. In 2018, we employed
approximately 32,000 employees and provided services to
approximately 3,600 customers, primarily in the
industrial/manufacturing/warehousing, construction, hospitality,
transportation, and retail industries. Our customers range in size
from small businesses to large corporate enterprises. All of our
temporary staff, whom we refer to as "field team members," are
employed by us. Most of our work assignments are short-term, and
many are filled on little advanced notice from our customers. In
addition to short and longer-term temporary work assignments, we
sometimes recruit and place workers in temp-to-hire
positions.
As of
April 9, 2019, we owned and operated 67 on-demand labor locations,
or branches, across 22 states. We currently operate as Command
Center, Inc., and we are also known in some locations as Command
Labor. All financial information is consolidated and reported in
our consolidated financial statements. Our corporate headquarters
is located in Lakewood, Colorado.
In
prior years we were organized as Command Staffing, LLC. We were
organized as a limited liability company in December 2002 and
commenced operations in 2003 as a franchisor of on-demand labor
businesses. In November 2005, Temporary Financial Services, Inc., a
public company, acquired the assets of Command Staffing, LLC and
Harborview Software, Inc., an affiliated company that owned the
software used in the operation of our on-demand labor branches. The
transaction was accounted for as if Command Staffing, LLC was the
accounting acquirer, and our name changed to Command Center,
Inc.
Industry Overview
The
on-demand labor industry has developed based on the business need
for flexible staffing solutions. Many businesses operate in a
cyclical production environment and find it difficult to staff
according to their changing business requirements. Companies also
desire a way to temporarily replace full-time employees when absent
due to illness, vacation, or unplanned termination. On-demand labor
offers customers the opportunity to immediately respond to changes
in staffing needs, reduce the costs associated with recruiting and
interviewing, eliminate unemployment and workers’
compensation exposure, and draw from a larger pool of potential
employees.
The
on-demand labor industry continues to develop specialized market
segments that reflect the diverse needs of the businesses it
serves. Technical skills, prior work history, duration of
assignment, and drug and background check requirements vary among
industries and customers. We operate primarily within the
short-term, semi-skilled and unskilled segments of the on-demand
labor industry. We endeavor to customize our services according to
the unique opportunities and assets presented by each of our
branches, while leveraging our overall size when possible. This
approach reduces our overhead costs, improves economies of scale,
establishes procedural uniformity and internal controls, and
creates a predictable internal environment for our field team
members.
Business
Strategic Growth Opportunities: We continue to
improve our network of on-demand labor branches. We supply a
quality workforce and we strive to consistently match the right
field team members to the right jobs. We have 67 locally-managed
branches throughout the United States that serve as trusted
partners to businesses and job seekers alike. Customers,
representing a variety of industries, trust us to learn their
business and to plan ahead to address their dynamic staffing needs.
Job seekers trust us to understand their complete employment
picture and place them in on-demand, temporary, temp-to-hire, or
permanent placement positions where they can grow, thrive, and
provide immediate value. The total number of branches open and
operating increased from 66 at the end of fiscal year 2017 to 67 at
the end of fiscal year 2018. In 2019, we plan to continue our
strategy of carefully balancing branch expansion against return on
investment at existing locations. In doing so, we expect to
concentrate our revenue growth efforts primarily on sales growth
within our existing branch structure, while possibly opening new
branches in areas that present exceptional opportunities, and
looking for acquisitions that will expand our existing operational
footprint. In all of our growth opportunities, we continue to
emphasize the fundamentals of our business: sell to quality
accounts, increase margins where possible, and provide exceptional
customer service.
On-demand Labor Branch Operations: In 2018, we
continued to focus on the basics of our business: service
consistency and excellence, margin improvement, cost containment,
sales effectiveness, and company culture. We concentrated on these
measures to improve profitability and solidify the groundwork for
future growth.
Our
branches are often located in proximity to concentrated commercial
and industrial areas typically with access to public transportation
and other services that are important to our field team members. We
have developed a branch demographic model to identify and qualify
potential future locations.
Our
operations are managed by in-branch personnel, area managers, and
corporate management. Where appropriate, business development
specialists are employed to help drive business to our branches.
Our compensation plans for branch personnel, area managers, and
other sales personnel are designed to secure and retain the
qualified individuals needed to meet our business, financial, and
growth objectives. Our personnel practices are designed to attract,
screen, hire, train, support, and retain qualified personnel at all
levels of our organization. We propagate best practices from our
higher performing branches across all operating groups to produce
consistent execution and improvements in company-wide
performance.
Our Temporary Staff, or Field Team Members: Field
team members are our product and our key asset. Our success is
highly dependent on our ability to attract, motivate, and reward
our field team members. We have invested in numerous programs
designed to create a long-term relationship with top-performing
field team members. These programs include health insurance, bonus
programs, safety rewards, longevity programs, and training
programs.
The
pool of qualified and available field team members varies by
location. For most of our branches, the supply of field team
members is sufficient and diverse enough to meet current customer
needs. However, in some locations, field team member availability
is a limiting factor. We continue to seek additional field team
members through internet postings, newspaper advertisements,
printed flyers, branch displays, career fairs, and
word-of-mouth.
Our Customers: In 2018, we serviced
approximately 3,600 customers across a variety of industries. Our
10 largest customers accounted for approximately 25% of our revenue
in 2018. Additionally, at December 28, 2018, 12.9% of total
accounts receivable was due from a single customer. The top
industries we served were industrial/manufacturing/warehousing,
construction, hospitality, transportation, and retail. In 2017, we
serviced approximately 3,200 customers in these same industries and
our 10 largest customers accounted for approximately 23% of our
revenue.
Our Marketing Strategy: We have adapted our sales
process to respond to our customers’ needs and significant
time constraints. Our customers are focused on their own business
requirements and rely on us to respond quickly and effectively with
smart solutions to their current challenges. Our unique sales
process starts by learning about customers and facilitating
conversations where we offer support and contribute to a growing
relationship. Together, we create an action plan that draws on our
core competencies and solves our customers’ needs. Once we
have resolved one need, we consistently strive to meet additional
needs as presented. Many of our existing customers are served by
multiple branches, across multiple cities, and in many cases,
across multiple states. We have tailored programs to specifically
address the needs of these national accounts and plan to
continue our efforts to expand our national accounts relationships
in the years ahead.
Our Workers’ Compensation Coverage: In
accordance with state laws, we provide our workforce with
workers’ compensation insurance. Currently, we are covered
under a large deductible policy with ACE American Insurance
Company, or ACE, where we have primary responsibility for claims
under the policy. Under our current policy, which has been in place
since April 1, 2014, we are responsible for covered losses and
expenses up to $500,000 per incident. Amounts in excess of $500,000
are the responsibility of ACE. From April 1, 2012 through March 31,
2014, we were covered under a large deductible policy issued by
Dallas National Insurance, who changed their name to Freestone
Insurance Company, or Freestone, in 2014. Under this prior policy,
we are responsible for covered losses and expenses up to $350,000
per incident. Amounts in excess of $350,000 were the responsibility
of Freestone; however, due to the current insolvency and
liquidation of Freestone (as set forth in more detail in the below
Risk Factors), any payments required to be made above this amount,
if any, will likely be paid by a state guaranty fund in the
jurisdiction where the injury occurred.
For
workers’ compensation claims originating in Washington and
North Dakota, we pay workers’ compensation insurance premiums
and obtain full coverage under mandatory state-administered
programs. Our liability associated with claims in these states is
limited to our premium payments.
Our Safety Program: To protect our workforce and
help control workers’ compensation insurance rates, we
maintain several company-wide safety programs designed to increase
safety awareness. We provide safety training through videos, safety
testing, and basic and remedial instruction. Branch managers
conduct periodic job site safety inspections on new and existing
jobs to ensure that our field team members are working in a safe
environment. We encourage safe work behavior through an incentive
program that rewards our field team members for working accident
free by allowing them to purchase safety and other items by using
earned points. We also encourage our field team members to report
unsafe working conditions. Branch managers also learn risk
management and proper safety protocols when attending training
sessions at our corporate office or elsewhere. We regularly
evaluate the risk profile of the work we undertake on an ongoing
basis and sometimes restrict classes of work in order to manage
risk appropriately.
Our Seasonality: Some of the industries in which
we operate are subject to seasonal fluctuation. Many of the jobs
filled by field team members are outdoors and generally performed
during the warmer months of the year. As a result, activity
increases in the spring and continues at higher levels through
summer, then begins to taper off during fall and through winter.
Seasonal fluctuations are typically less in the more temperate
parts of the United States, where many of our branches are located.
Fluctuations in seasonal business affect financial performance from
period to period. Severe weather in any of our locations for
prolonged periods has the potential to impair our business within
these geographies, given the outdoor nature of many of our
assignments.
Our Competition: The manual labor sector of the
on-demand labor industry in which we operate is largely fragmented
and highly competitive, with low barriers to entry. Our competitors
range in size from small, local or regional operators with five or
fewer locations to large, multi-national operations with hundreds
of locations.
The
primary competitive factors in our market segment include price,
the ability to timely provide the requested workers, and overall
quality of service. Secondary factors include worker quality and
performance, efficiency, the ability to meet the
business-to-business vendor requirements, name recognition,
established reputation, and customer relationships. While barriers
to entry are low, businesses operating in this sector of the
on-demand labor industry do require access to significant working
capital, particularly in the spring and summer when seasonal
staffing requirements are highest. Lack of working capital can be a
significant impediment to growth for small, local, and regional
on-demand labor providers. In addition, increasing government
regulation is also a barrier to entry as many smaller firms cannot
profitably comply with the administrative burden of the new
regulations.
Our Trademarks and Trade Names: We have
registered “Command,” “Command Center,”
“Command Staffing,” “Command Labor,”
“Real Jobs for Real People,” “Bakken
Staffing,” and “Exceeding Expectations Every
Time,” as service marks with the U.S. Patent and Trademark
Office.
Our Intellectual Property: We have proprietary
software systems in place to handle most aspects of our operations,
including field team member dispatch activities, invoicing,
accounts receivable, and payroll. Our software systems also provide
internal control over our operations, and allow us to produce
internal management reports necessary to track the financial
performance of individual branches. We refine our systems and
processes based on the feedback we receive from management and
others within the Company in order to adequately track and manage
individual branches. Our proprietary software systems are not
patented and are not licensed to, or used by, any other
organization. We have invested in off-site back-up and storage
systems that we believe provide reasonable protections for our
electronic information systems against breakdowns as well as other
disruptions and other unauthorized intrusions.
Our Real Property: We lease the real property for our
corporate office and of all of our branch locations. All of these
properties are leased at market rates that vary depending on
location. Each branch is between 1,000 and 5,000 square feet,
depending on location and market conditions. We believe that our
corporate office and each of the branch locations are adequate for
our current needs.
Our Employees: We currently employ a staff of
approximately 30 at our corporate headquarters in Lakewood,
Colorado, of which approximately 30 are full-time employees. The
number of employees at our corporate headquarters is not expected
to significantly increase over the next year. We also employ
approximately 200 field operations staff in our various branches,
of which approximately 180 are full-time employees. During 2018, we
employed approximately 32,000 field team members. We are the
employer of record for our field team members, and as such,
are responsible for collecting withholding taxes and for paying
employer contributions for social security, unemployment tax,
workers’ compensation, other insurance programs, and all
other governmental requirements imposed on employers, including any
imposed by state and local governments or regulatory agencies. In
addition to completing Form I-9 required by the Department of
Homeland Security, we also verify the identity and work eligibility
of each new employee through the federal E-Verify
system.
Environmental Concerns: Because we are a service
business, federal, state, or local laws that regulate the discharge
of materials into the environment do not impact our
business.
Available Information: We make the following items
available, free of charge, through the investor section of our
website: annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form
10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and all amendments to those
reports. These reports are available as soon as reasonably
practicable after such material is electronically filed with or
furnished to the SEC. Charters adopted by the Audit, Compensation,
and Nominating and Governance Committees of our Board of Directors,
as well as our Corporate Governance Guidelines, Standards of Ethics
and Business Conduct, and Policy on Roles and Responsibilities of
the Chairperson of the Board are also available through the
investor section of our website. Our website address
is: www.commandonline.com. The information
contained on our website, or on other websites linked to our
website, is not part of this Form
10-K.
Any
materials we file with the SEC may be read and copied at the
SEC’s Public Reference Room, located at 100 F Street, N.E.,
Washington, D.C. 20549, on official business days during the hours
of 10:00 am to 3:00 pm. Information on the operation of the Public
Reference Room may be obtained by calling the SEC at
1-800-732-0330. The SEC maintains a website that contains reports,
proxy and information statements, and other information regarding
issuers that file electronically with the SEC at http://www.sec.gov.
Hire Quest Merger
Agreement: On April 7, 2019, the Company, CCNI
One, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company (“Merger
Sub 1”), Command Florida, LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of
the Company (“Merger Sub 2”), and Hire Quest Holdings,
LLC (“Hire Quest”), entered into an Agreement and Plan
of Merger (the “Merger Agreement”), providing for the
acquisition of Hire Quest by the Company. The Merger Agreement
provides that, upon the terms and subject to the conditions set
forth in the Merger Agreement, (i) Merger Sub 1 will be merged with
and into Hire Quest (the “First Merger”), with Hire
Quest being the surviving entity (the “First Surviving
Company”), and (ii) immediately following the First Merger,
the First Surviving Company will be merged with and into Merger Sub
2 (the “Second Merger” and, together with the First
Merger, the “Merger”), with Merger Sub 2 being the
surviving entity (the “Surviving Company”). Upon
completion of the Merger and subject to shareholder approval, the
Company will change its name to HireQuest, Inc. In addition, the
Merger Agreement contemplates that the Company will commence a
self-tender offer to purchase up to 1,500,000 shares of its common
stock at share price of $6.00 per share (the
“Offer”).
Hire Quest is a trusted name in temporary staffing. Hire Quest
provides the back-office support team for Trojan Labor and Acrux
Staffing franchised branch locations across the United States.
Trojan Labor provides temporary staffing services which includes
general labor, industrial, and construction personnel. Acrux
Staffing provides temporary staffing services which includes
skilled, semi-skilled and general labor industrial personnel, as
well as clerical and secretarial personnel.
Subject to the terms and conditions of the Merger Agreement, which
has been approved by the Board of Directors of the Company and the
members of Hire Quest, if the Merger is completed, all of the
ownership interests in Hire Quest will be converted into the right
to receive an aggregate number of shares of the Company’s
common stock representing 68% of the shares of the Company’s
common stock outstanding immediately after the effective time of
the Merger but prior to giving effect to the purchase of the
Company’s common stock pursuant to the Offer. The
Merger Agreement requires Hire Quest’s net tangible assets at
closing to be at least $14 million.
The Company and Hire Quest have made customary representations,
warranties and covenants in the Merger Agreement. Subject to
certain exceptions, each of the Company and Hire Quest is required,
among other things, to conduct its business in the ordinary course
in all material respects during the interim period between the
execution of the Merger Agreement and the closing of the Merger.
The Company is required to seek shareholder approval of (i) the
amendment of the Company’s articles of incorporation to
increase the authorized shares of Company’s common stock and
to change the name of the Company to “HireQuest, Inc.”,
(ii) the issuance of shares of common stock pursuant to the Merger
Agreement and the related change of control of the Company pursuant
to Nasdaq listing rules, and (iii) the conversion of the Company
from a Washington corporation to a Delaware corporation. The
Company will call and hold a shareholders meeting seeking to obtain
such approvals. The
Company will distribute proxy statements to shareholders of record
containing additional details regarding the
Merger.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
Our common stock value and our business, results of
operations, cash flows and financial condition are subject to
various risks, including, but not limited to those set forth below.
If any of the following risks actually occur, our common stock,
business, results of operations, cash flows and financial condition
could be materially adversely affected. In such case, the value of
your investment could decline and you may lose all or part of the
money you paid to buy our common stock. These risk factors should
be carefully considered together with the other information in this
Form 10-K, including the risks and uncertainties described under
the heading “Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking
Statements.”
We are
vulnerable to fluctuations in the general economy. The
staffing needs of our customers vary greatly with the overall
condition of the economy. Even though the economy is currently
experiencing a period of growth, there is a risk that conditions
will change, and that the future economic climate will become more
volatile, or uncertain. This could have a material adverse effect
on our business and operating results. During periods of weak
economic growth or economic contraction, the demand for staffing
services typically declines. When demand drops, our business is
typically impacted unfavorably as we experience a decrease of our
revenue but our selling and administrative expense base may not
decline as quickly as revenues. In periods of decline, we can only
reduce selling and administrative expenses to a certain level
without negatively impacting the long-term potential of our branch
network and brands. Additionally, during economic downturns
companies may slow the rate at which they pay their vendors, or
they may become unable to pay their obligations. If our customers
become unable to pay amounts owed to us, or pay us more slowly,
then our cash flow and profitability may suffer. Deterioration of
general economic conditions could have an adverse material effect
on our business, financial condition, and results of
operations.
We are vulnerable to downturns in regional and local
economies. As of April 9,
2019, we own and operate 67 branches across 22 states. As such, we
are subject to regional and local economic conditions in many
markets. Additionally, our new branches are sometimes placed in
metropolitan areas where we have one or more existing branches,
increasing our exposure to future economic weakness in those local
areas. Deterioration in regional and local economic conditions in
the areas in which we operate could have a material adverse impact
on our business, financial condition and results of
operations.
We rely on a number of key customers and if we lose any one of
these customers, our revenues may decline. Although we have a significant number of customers
in each of the geographic markets that we operate in, we rely on
certain key customers for a significant portion of our revenues. In
2018, our 10 largest customers accounted for approximately 25% of
our revenue. In 2017, our 10 largest customers accounted for
approximately 23% of our revenue. In the future, a small number of
customers may represent a significant portion of our total revenues
in any given period. These customers may not consistently use our
services at a particular rate over any subsequent period. The loss
of any of these customers could adversely affect our revenues and
profitability.
We are vulnerable to seasonal fluctuations with lower demand in the
fall and winter months. Revenues generated from
branches in markets subject to seasonal fluctuations will be less
stable and may be lower than in other markets. Locating branches in
highly seasonal markets involves higher risks. Our individual
branch revenue can fluctuate significantly on both a quarter over
quarter and year over year basis, depending on the local economic
conditions and need for temporary labor services in the local
economy. One of our goals is to increase the diversity of customers
and industries we service at both the branch and the company level.
This will reduce the potential negative impact of an economic
downturn in any one industry or region. To the extent that we
consider opening new branches, we intend to select branch locations
with a view to maximizing total long-term return on our investment
in branches, personnel, marketing, and other fixed and sunk costs.
However, there can be no assurance that our profitability will not
be adversely affected by low returns on investment in certain
highly-seasonal markets. Weather can also have a significant impact
on our operations as there is typically lower demand for staffing
services during adverse weather conditions in the winter
months.
The market for our common stock is limited and our stockholders may
have difficulty reselling their shares when desired or at
attractive market prices. Our stock price and our
listing may make it more difficult for our stockholders to resell
shares when desired or at attractive prices. Our Company stock
trades on the NASDAQ stock exchange. Our common stock has continued
to trade in low volumes and at low prices. On December 7, 2017, we
effected a 1-for-12 reverse stock split of our common and preferred
stock which also affected our trading volume. Some investors view
low-priced stocks as unduly speculative and therefore not
appropriate candidates for investment. Many brokerage firms and
institutional investors have internal policies prohibiting the
purchase or maintenance of positions in low-priced
stocks.
“Penny
stock” rules may make buying or selling our securities
difficult and impact liquidity. Trading in our
securities may be subject to the SEC’s “penny
stock” rules. The SEC has adopted regulations that generally
define a penny stock to be any equity security that has a market
price of less than $5.00 per share, subject to certain exceptions.
These rules require that any broker-dealer who recommends our
securities to persons other than prior customers and accredited
investors must, prior to the sale, make a special written
suitability determination for the purchaser and receive the
purchaser's written agreement to execute the transaction. Unless an
exception is available, the regulations require, prior to any
transaction involving a penny stock, the delivery of a disclosure
schedule explaining the penny stock market and the risks associated
with trading in the penny stock market. In addition, broker-dealers
must disclose commissions payable to both the broker-dealer and the
registered representative, and current quotations for the
securities they offer. The additional burdens imposed upon
broker-dealers by these requirements may discourage broker-dealers
from recommending transactions in our securities, which could
severely limit the liquidity of our securities and consequently
adversely affect the market price for our
securities.
Loss of key management personnel could negatively affect our
business. We have a small management team and
we are highly dependent on principal members of our management
team to operate our business. The loss of any key employee, or the
loss of one of our executives, could have a material adverse effect
on our business. While any key executive and management
changes are carefully considered to ensure business continuity and
performance, there is no way to estimate the potential impact of
such changes. On April 1, 2018, our previous CEO of five-years was
replaced by our current CEO. Following the replacement of key
personnel, including our CEO, it may take new employees substantial
time and efforts to develop important expertise and knowledge. Our
future performance depends on our continued ability to identify,
recruit, motivate, and retain key management personnel at all
levels. The failure to attract and retain key management personnel
could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial
condition, and results of operations.
If we lose members of our Board of Directors, our ability to manage
our business could be impaired. We have a highly talented board
of directors and there are periodic changes to the board for a
variety of business and personal reasons, including to ensure an
optimal mix of experience and expertise. In January 2018, two
members of our Board of Directors resigned, one of which was the
chairman. While we were able to appoint replacement board members,
it may take these new board members substantial time and efforts to
regain the previous directors’ expertise and knowledge. Our
future performance also depends on our continued ability to
identify, recruit, motivate, and retain board members. The failure
to attract and retain board members could have a material adverse
effect on our business, financial condition, and results of
operations.
Difficulty in attracting, developing, and retaining qualified
branch personnel could negatively affect our
business. We rely significantly on the performance and
productivity of our branch managers and business development
specialists to help drive new business. Each branch manager has
primary responsibility for managing the operations of the
individual branch, including recruiting workers, daily dispatch of
personnel, collection of accounts receivable, and overall customer
service. To combat a typically high turnover rate for branch
managers in the on-demand labor industry, we continue to develop
and refine our training and compensation plans to encourage
employee retention. There is no assurance that our training and
compensation plans will reduce turnover in this
position.
Loss of key personnel could negatively affect our
business. The loss of any key executive or manager
could have a material adverse effect on our business. Our future
performance also depends on our ability to identify, recruit,
motivate, and retain key management personnel. The failure to
attract and retain key management personnel could have a material
adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of
operations.
Unavailability of a reliable pool of field team members may
negatively impact our business. On-demand labor
companies must continually attract reliable temporary workers to
meet customer needs. We compete for such workers with other
temporary labor businesses, as well as with actual and potential
customers, some of which seek to fill positions directly with
regular or field team members. In addition, our customers sometimes
hire our field team members into permanent positions. From time to
time, during peak periods and/or in certain geographic regions, we
may experience shortages of available temporary
workers.
We are dependent upon the continued availability of workers'
compensation insurance. We maintain workers'
compensation insurance as required by state laws. Few insurance
carriers provide workers' compensation coverage for staffing
companies in the manual labor market, and the insurance market may
tighten even further in the future. We cannot be certain that we
will be able to obtain adequate levels of insurance with acceptable
terms, coverages, deductibles and collateral requirements. In all
of the states in which we operate, we cannot engage in business
without workers' compensation insurance. In order to obtain
coverage, we are required to post collateral with the carrier in
the form of cash or a letter of credit from our lender. The carrier
can retain this collateral for extended periods of time, and
increase the amount of such collateral.
Increased workers’ compensation insurance premiums could
negatively affect operating results. Workers’
compensation expenses and the related liability accrual are based
on our actual claims experience. Currently, as we have throughout
most of our corporate history, we maintain a high deductible
workers’ compensation insurance policy. Our current
workers’ compensation policy has a deductible limit of
$500,000 per incident, and our workers’ compensation policy
immediately prior to April 2014 has a deductible limit of $350,000
per incident. For the years prior to April 2011, our policy has a
deductible limit of $250,000 per person. As a result, we are
substantially self-insured. Our management training and safety
programs aim to minimize both the frequency and severity of
workers’ compensation insurance claims, but a large number of
claims, or a small number of significant claims, could require
substantial payments. We can provide no assurance that we will be
able to successfully limit the frequency and severity of our
workers’ compensation claims, or that our insurance premiums
and costs will not increase substantially. Higher costs for
workers’ compensation coverage, if incurred, will have a
material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and
results of operations.
Increased competition in our highly competitive industry may impact
our ability to retain customers or market share. We
operate in a highly competitive industry with low barriers to
entry. We face competition from a wide variety of companies ranging
in size from large, multi-national corporations to small, local
sole proprietors. This causes extensive pricing pressure, and there
can be no assurance that we will be able to retain customers or
market share going forward, nor that we will be able to maintain
profitability or current profit margins.
We may not be able to recover collateral deposits we have placed
with our workers’ compensation insurance carrier.
Historically our workers’ compensation insurance carriers
have required collateral deposits to secure our payment of claims
up to the amount of our policy deductible. For the two-year period
ending March 31, 2014, Dallas National Insurance, now known as
Freestone Insurance Company, or Freestone, provided our
workers’ compensation insurance coverage under a high
deductible ($350,000 per incident) policy. Under the terms of the
policy, we were required to provide cash collateral of $1.8 million
as security for payment of claims up to the policy deductible. In
April 2014, the Insurance Commissioner of the State of Delaware
placed Freestone in receivership due to concerns about
Freestone’s financial condition. In August 2014, the
receivership was converted into a liquidation proceeding. In late
2015, we filed timely proofs of claim with the Receiver for return
of our collateral deposits, one filed as a priority claim and one
as a general claim. Based on available information, the company
determined it is more likely than not that our priority claim will
be treated in a similar manner as other creditors, resulting in the
priority claim having little to no value. Accordingly, the reserve
on this asset was reduced in 2018 by approximately $1.5 million,
resulting in a net carrying amount of $260,000. In the event the
company receives substantially less than our reasonably estimated
amount, there may be a material negative effect on our financial
statements.
Changes in financial accounting standards or practices may cause
adverse, unexpected financial reporting fluctuations and affect our
reported results of operations. We are required to
prepare our financial statements in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles in the United States, or U.S. GAAP,
which is periodically revised and/or expanded. From time to time,
we are required to adopt new or revised accounting standards issued
by recognized authoritative bodies, including the Financial
Accounting Standards Board, or the FASB, and the SEC. It is
possible that we may be required to adopt future accounting
standards which may require additional changes to the current
accounting treatment that we apply to our financial statements and
may also require us to make significant changes to our reporting
systems. Such changes could result in a material adverse impact on
our business, results of operations, and financial
condition.
The delay between the time we pay our temporary workers and other
creditors and the time we collect from our customers
requires debt
refinancing to provide working
capital. Field team members are typically paid on the
same day the services are performed, while customers are generally
billed on a weekly basis with seven-day payment terms. We currently
have an account purchase agreement with Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.,
which allows us to sell eligible accounts receivable for 90% of the
invoiced amount on a full recourse basis up to the facility
maximum, or $14.0 million. When the receivable is collected, the
remaining 10% is paid to us, less applicable fees and interest. The
term of the agreement is through April 7, 2020. The cancelation of
the account purchase agreement would have a material adverse effect
on our liquidity, cash flows, and results of
operations.
The delay between the time we pay our temporary workers and the
time we collect from our customers requires aggressive management
of our credit risk and places pressure on working
capital. Pressure on our working capital requires that
we manage the resulting credit risk. The magnitude of the risk
varies with general economic conditions. We believe that write-offs
for doubtful accounts can be maintained at commercially acceptable
levels without the need to resort to unduly intrusive credit
management practices that could interfere with customer acquisition
and retention. Nevertheless, there can be no assurance that our
ability to achieve and sustain profitable operations will not be
adversely affected by losses from doubtful accounts or customer
relations problems arising from our efforts to manage credit
risk.
Limitations in our receivables financing agreements negatively
impact our liquidity. Under our account purchase
agreement with Wells Fargo Bank, our borrowing base is limited to
the lesser of: (1) 90% of acceptable accounts as defined in the
agreement, or (2) $14.0 million. Our collateral requirements with
our workers' compensation insurance carrier are secured by a $6.2
million letter of credit from our lender. The amount of the letter
of credit results in a reduction to our borrowing base, currently
reducing funds otherwise available to us by $6.2 million. This
limitation on our liquidity may result in our inability to expand
or to sustain our operations, which could result in a material
adverse impact on our business.
Increased employee expenses could adversely affect our
operations. We are required to comply with all
applicable federal, state, and local laws and regulations relating
to employment, including verification of eligibility for
employment, occupational safety and health laws, wage and hour
requirements, employment insurance, and equal opportunity
employment laws. Costs and expenses related to these requirements
are a significant operating expense and may increase as a result of
changes in such laws or regulations requiring employers to provide
specified employee benefits (such as health insurance), increases
in the minimum wage or the level of existing benefits, or the
lengthening of periods for which unemployment benefits are
available. We cannot assure that we will be able to increase fees
charged to our customers to offset any increased costs and
expenses, and higher costs may have a material adverse effect on
our business, financial condition, and results of
operations.
Failure to maintain adequate financial and management processes and
controls could lead to errors in our financial
reporting. If our management is unable to certify the
effectiveness of our internal controls, including those of our
third party vendors, or if material weaknesses in our internal
controls are identified, we could be subject to regulatory scrutiny
and a loss of public confidence. In addition, if we do not maintain
adequate financial and management personnel, processes, and
controls, we may not be able to accurately report our financial
performance on a timely basis, which could cause our stock price to
fall.
We will continue to be impacted by new or existing laws and
regulations relating to employment. In addition to
federal and state laws and regulations, many counties and cities
have become active in regulating various aspects of employment,
including minimum wages, paid sick leave, application forms and
background checks, and required notices to employees, among others.
As a staffing company and large employer with a wide geographical
footprint, we are often faced with new legal requirements. Although
we believe that we will be able to maintain appropriate compliance
procedures, there is no assurance that our efforts will always be
timely or effective, or that we will be able to recover the
increased cost of new legal requirements through timely pricing
increases to our customers.
We may incur additional tax liabilities that exceed our
estimates. We are subject to federal taxes and a
multitude of state and local taxes. We are regularly subject to
audit by tax authorities. Although we believe our tax estimates are
reasonable, the final determination of tax audits and any related
litigation could be materially different from our historical tax
provisions and accruals. The results of an audit or litigation
could materially harm our business. The taxing authorities of the
jurisdictions in which we operate may challenge our methodologies
for determining tax liabilities, or change their laws, which could
increase our effective tax rate and negatively affect our financial
position and results of operations.
We may incur additional costs and regulatory risks relating to new
laws regulating the hiring of undocumented
workers. In
addition to federal laws, the statutes of several states regulate
employer practices relating to the identification and eligibility
to work of new hires. We have implemented procedures intended to
meet all of these requirements. We process information on each new
employee through the federal government’s E-Verify system.
Although we believe that we are in compliance and we will be able
to maintain appropriate procedures, we cannot assure that our
compliance will not be flawed or delayed because of the large
number of temporary personnel that we employ. In some cases, the
penalties for noncompliance are punitive. Regulatory requirements
imposed on employers and enforcement actions relating to
immigration status of employees are expected to increase. If we are
not able to maintain appropriate compliance procedures, our
operations would be materially and adversely affected.
We will incur additional costs and regulatory risks relating to the
impact of health care reform upon our business and failure to
comply with such rules and regulations could materially harm our
business. The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and
the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010, or
collectively, the Health Care Reform Laws, include various
health-related provisions that took effect in 2015 and 2016,
including the requirement that most individuals have health
insurance and establishing new regulations on health plans.
Although the Health Care Reform Laws do not mandate that employers
offer health insurance, beginning in 2016 tax penalties are
assessable on large employers which do not offer health insurance
that meets certain affordability or benefit requirements. Providing
such additional health insurance benefits to our qualifying
temporary workers, or the payment of tax penalties if such coverage
is not provided, will increase our costs. The economic impact of
the Health Care Reform Laws to us is not yet known. It is likely
that the Health Care Reform Laws will be revised or rewritten
pursuant to proposed legislation. The requirements and the cost
impact of revisions to existing laws, Health Care Reform Laws, or
new health care legislation is unknown. Under both the present laws
and proposed legislation, if we are unable to raise the rates we
charge our customers to cover the costs of these programs, such
increases in costs could materially harm our business.
We may be exposed to employment-related claims and costs from field
team members, customers, or third parties that could materially
adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of
operations. We are in the business of employing people
and placing them in the workplaces of other businesses. As the
employer of record, we are at risk for claims brought by our field
team members, such as wage and hour claims, discrimination and
harassment actions and workers' compensation claims. We are also at
risk for liabilities alleged to have been caused by our field team
members (such as claims relating to personal injuries, property
damage, immigration status, misappropriation of funds or property,
violation of environmental laws, or criminal activity). Significant
instances of these types of issues may impact our customers’
perception of us and may have a negative effect on our results of
operations. The risk is heightened because we do not have control
over our customers’ workplace or direct supervision of our
field team members. If we are found liable for the actions or
omissions of our field team members or our customers, and adequate
insurance coverage is not available, our business, financial
condition, and results of operations could be materially and
adversely affected.
Competitive factors may require us to absorb increases in operating
costs, and we may lose volume as a result. We expect to
raise prices for our services in amounts sufficient to offset
increased costs of services, operating costs, and cost increases
due to inflation, regulatory requirements and to improve our return
on invested capital. However, competitive factors may require us to
absorb cost increases, which would have a negative effect on our
operating margins. Even if we are able to increase costs as
desired, we may lose volume to competitors willing to service
customers at a lower price.
We face competition from companies that have greater resources than
we do and we may not be able to effectively compete with these
companies. There are several very large full-service
and specialized temporary labor companies competing in national,
regional and local markets. Many of these competitors have
substantially greater financial and marketing resources than we
have. Price competition in the staffing industry is intense and we
expect this level of competition to remain high and to increase in
the future. Competition could have a material adverse effect on our
business, financial condition, and results of operations. There is
also a risk that competitors, perceiving our lack of capital
resources, may undercut our prices or increase promotional
expenditures in our strongest markets in an effort to force us out
of business.
Improper disclosure of employee and customer data could result in
liabilities and harm our reputation. In the course of
our business, we collect, store, use, and transmit information
about our employees and customers. Protecting the privacy of this
information is critical to our business. We have established a
system of controls for safeguarding the security and privacy of our
data. Our security controls may not, in every case, be adequate to
prevent unauthorized internal or external intrusions into our
systems and improper disclosure of personal data and confidential
information relating to our employees, our customers or our
business. The regulations relating to the security and privacy of
information are increasingly prevalent and demanding. The failure
to adequately protect private information could expose us to claims
from employees and customers and regulatory actions, harm our
reputation, and have a material adverse effect on our business,
financial condition, and results of operations. Additional security
measures we may take to address customer or employee concerns may
cause higher operating expenses.
Cyberattacks or other breaches of our technology hardware and
software, as well as risks associated with compliance and data
privacy could have an adverse effect on our systems, our service to
our customers, our reputation, our competitive position, and
financial results. Our ability to manage our operations
successfully is critical to our success. Our business relies on our
ability to electronically gather, compile, process, store and
distribute data and other information. Unintended interruptions or
failures resulting from computer and telecommunications failures,
equipment or software malfunction, power outages, catastrophic
events, security breaches (such as unauthorized access by hackers),
social engineering schemes, unauthorized access, errors in usage by
our employees, computer viruses, ransomware or malware, and other
events could harm our business. While we have taken measures
to minimize the impact of these problems, the proper functioning of
these systems is critical to our business operations. Any security
breach or failure in our computer equipment, systems or data could
result in the interruption of our business operations, tarnish our
reputation, and expose us to damages and litigation.
Our directors, officers and current principal stockholders own a
large percentage of our common stock and could limit other
stockholders’ influence over corporate
decisions. As of April
9, 2019, our directors, officers and current
stockholders holding more than 5% of our common stock collectively
beneficially own, in the aggregate, approximately 38% of our
outstanding common stock. As a result, these stockholders acting
together, may be capable of controlling most matters requiring
stockholder approval, including the election of directors, approval
of mergers, and other significant corporate transactions. This
concentration of ownership may have the effect of delaying or
preventing a change in control. The interests of these stockholders
may not always coincide with our corporate interests or the
interests of our other stockholders, and they may act in a manner
with which some stockholders may not agree or that may not be in
the best interests of all stockholders.
We will likely be party, from time to time, to various legal
proceedings, lawsuits, and other claims arising in the ordinary
course of our business. In the ordinary course of
business, we are subject to a variety of legal proceedings,
lawsuits and claims. We anticipate that disputes may arise in the
future relating to contract, employment, labor relations, and other
matters that could result in litigation or arbitration. These
proceedings could divert the attention of our management team and
result in costly or unfavorable outcomes. Any such litigation could
result in substantial expense and reduced profits, harm our
reputation, create inability to obtain certain insurance, and have
a materially adverse impact on our business and financial
condition. Also see Item 3
“Legal Proceedings”.
Our customer contracts contain termination provisions that could
decrease our future revenues and earnings. Most of our
customer contracts are either day-to-day or can be terminated by
the customer on short or no notice without penalty. Our customers
are, therefore, not contractually obligated to continue to do
business with us in the future. This creates uncertainty with
respect to the revenues and earnings we may recognize with respect
to our customer contracts.
We have a history of net losses. Although we have
recorded a net profit in several of our most recent fiscal years,
as of December 28, 2018, we have an accumulated deficit of
approximately $36 million. We have incurred net losses in many of
our fiscal years since inception. We may incur additional operating
losses. We make no assurance that our revenue will increase or that
we will be profitable in any future period.
If our goodwill is impaired, we will record an additional non-cash
charge to our results of operations and the amount of the charge
may be material. At least annually, or whenever events
or circumstances arise indicating impairment may exist, we review
goodwill for impairment as required by U.S. GAAP. In June 2016, we
purchased substantially all of the assets of Hanwood Arkansas, LLC,
an Arkansas limited liability company, and Hanwood Oklahoma, LLC,
an Oklahoma limited liability company. Together these companies
operated as Hancock Staffing, or Hancock, from branches located in
Little Rock, Arkansas and Oklahoma City, Oklahoma. In connection
with our 2016 acquisition of Hancock, we identified and recognized
$1.3 million in goodwill that we added to the carrying amount of
$2.5 million from the acquisition of Disaster Recovery Services
after the write-off. The resulting carrying amount of
$3.8 million could change if there are future changes in our
capital structure, cost of debt, interest rates, capital
expenditure levels, ability to perform at levels that were
forecasted, or a permanent change to our market capitalization. In
the future, we may need to further reduce the carrying amount of
goodwill by taking an additional non-cash charge to our results of
operations. Such a charge would have the effect of reducing
goodwill with a corresponding impairment expense and may have a
material effect upon our reported results. The additional expense
may reduce our reported profitability or increase our reported
losses in future periods and could negatively affect the market for
our securities, our ability to obtain other sources of capital, and
may generally have a negative effect on our future
operations.
ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF
COMMENTS
None.
ITEM 2. DESCRIPTION OF
PROPERTIES
We
presently lease office space for our corporate headquarters in
Lakewood, Colorado. We also lease the property for all of our
current branch locations. All of these branches are leased at
market rates that vary in amount, depending on location. Most of
our branch leases have terms that extend over three to five years.
The majority of our leases have cancellation provisions that allow
us to cancel with 90 days' notice. Other leases have been in
existence long enough that the term has expired and we are
currently occupying the premises on month-to-month tenancies. For
additional information related to our operating leases
see Note 9 –
Commitments and Contingencies in our notes to the
consolidated financial statements.
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
Freestone Insurance Company Liquidation: From April 2012
through March 2014, our workers’ compensation insurance
coverage was provided by Dallas National Insurance, which changed
its corporate name to Freestone Insurance Company in 2013 (Dallas
National Insurance and Freestone Insurance Company are collectively
referred to as “Freestone”). Under the terms of these
insurance policies, we were required to provide cash collateral of
$900,000 per year, for a total of $1.8 million, as a non-depleting
fund to secure our payment up to the deductible amount on claims
occurring within the respective policy years.
From
July 2008 through March 2011, our workers’ compensation
coverage was provided under an agreement with AMS Staff Leasing II,
through its master workers’ compensation policy with
Freestone. During this time period, we deposited approximately
$500,000 with an affiliate of Freestone for collateral related to
the coverage provided to the company through AMS Staff Leasing II
and its policy with Freestone.
In
April 2014, the Insurance Commissioner of the State of Delaware
placed Freestone in receivership due to concerns about its
financial condition. In August 2014, the receivership was converted
to a liquidation proceeding. In late 2015, we filed timely proofs
of claim with the Receiver demonstrating our claimed right to
return of the company’s collateral deposits. One proof of
claim is filed as a priority claim seeking return of the full
amount of our collateral deposits. The other proof of claim is a
general claim covering non-collateral items. If it is ultimately
determined by the court that our claim is not a priority claim, or
if there are insufficient assets in the liquidation to satisfy the
priority claims, we may not receive any or all of our
collateral.
During
the second quarter of 2015 and the first quarter of 2016, after
evaluating information known at each point in time regarding the
Freestone receivership, it became apparent there was significant
uncertainty related to the collectability of the $500,000 deposit
previously placed under the AMS Staff Leasing II agreement related
to our insurance coverage from July 2008 through March 2011.
Because of this, we recorded a reserve of $250,000 in each of those
quarters, thereby fully reserving this deposit.
In late
May 2017, the Receiver filed a petition with the court, proposing a
plan as to how the Receiver would identify and pay collateral to
all insureds that paid cash collateral to Freestone. In the
petition, the Receiver acknowledged receiving only $500,000 of our
collateral. Of the $500,000 acknowledged, the Receiver proposed to
return only approximately $6,000 to us. In response to additional
information provided to and sought from the Receiver by us and by
others, the Receiver has withdrawn the initial petition,
acknowledging possible inaccuracies.
As part
of our review of first quarter 2018 financial results, the
company’s management and board of directors reviewed the
likelihood of collecting the remaining $1.8 million of collateral
paid to Freestone for policy years beginning in April of 2012 and
continuing through March of 2014. Based on court filings and other
available information, it was determined that it is more likely
than not that our priority claim will be treated in a similar
manner as other creditors, resulting in the priority claim having
little to no value. We believe that our recovery, if any, of the
deposits placed with Freestone and its affiliates will be the
greater of: (i) the amount determined and allowed resulting from a
tracing analysis of our collateral deposits; or (ii) the amount we
would receive in distribution as a general unsecured claimant based
on the amount of our collateral deposit.
Therefore,
we reasonably estimate the high end of the amount the company might
possibly recover through the receivership process is approximately
20% of the $1.8 million deposit amount. Accordingly, for the first
quarter of 2018, the reserve on this asset was reduced by
approximately $1.5 million, resulting in a net carrying amount of
$260,000. This amount is consistent with our current evaluation of
the Freestone receivership matter.
In July
2018, the Receiver filed with the Delaware Court of Chancery the
Second Accounting setting forth Freestone’s estimated assets
and liabilities for the period January 1, 2016, through December
31, 2016. The Second Accounting does not clarify the issues with
respect to collateral claims, priorities or return of collateral.
In the accounting, the Receiver reports total assets consisting of
cash and cash equivalents of $87.8 million as of December 31, 2016,
and estimated liabilities of $252.0 million.
Presently,
the Receiver has not put forth an amended or new petition regarding
its position as to precisely how cash collateral claimants should
be treated. Therefore, our stated reasonable estimate is the best
guidance we can offer as to the ultimate outcome of this matter. In
the event the Company receives substantially less than our
reasonably estimated amount, there may be a material negative
effect on our financial statements.
Other
than the Freestone litigation described above, on occasion, we may
be involved in legal matters arising in the ordinary course of our
business. While management believes that such matters are currently
insignificant, matters arising in the ordinary course of business
for which we are, or could become involved in litigation, may have
a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or
results of operations in the future.
ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY
DISCLOSURE
Not
applicable.
PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S
COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF
EQUITY SECURITIES
Reverse Stock Split
In
December 2017, we filed an amendment to our Articles of
Incorporation and effected a 1-for-12 reverse stock split of our
common and preferred stock, effective as of the close of business
on December 7, 2017, whereby 60,615,549 shares of our common stock
were exchanged for 5,051,542 newly issued common shares. Under the
terms of the reverse stock split, fractional shares issuable to
stockholders were cashed out, resulting in a reverse split slightly
more than 1-for-12 in the aggregate. All stock prices, per share
amounts, and number of shares in this Form 10-K have been
retroactively adjusted to reflect the 1-for-12 reverse stock split,
resulting in the transfer of approximately $56,000 from common
stock to additional paid in capital at December 29, 2017 and
December 30, 2016.
Market Information
Our
common stock is listed on the NASDAQ Stock Exchange under the
symbol “CCNI.” The following table shows the high and
low sales prices for the common stock for the quarterly period
indicated for the last two fiscal years:
|
High
|
Low
|
Fourth Quarter,
2018
|
$5.91
|
$3.55
|
Third Quarter,
2018
|
6.30
|
5.14
|
Second Quarter,
2018
|
6.40
|
5.35
|
First Quarter,
2018
|
6.49
|
5.32
|
Fourth Quarter,
2017
|
6.12
|
4.80
|
Third Quarter,
2017
|
5.40
|
3.72
|
Second Quarter,
2017
|
4.44
|
3.96
|
First Quarter,
2017
|
5.04
|
4.20
|
Holders of the Corporation’s Capital Stock
At
April
9, 2019, we had approximately 205 stockholders of
record. This figure does not reflect persons or entities that hold
their stock in nominee or “street” name through various
brokerage firms.
Dividends
No cash
dividends have been declared on our common stock to date and, at
present, we do not anticipate paying a cash dividend on our common
stock in the foreseeable future.
Equity Compensation Plan Information
Pursuant
to Item 201(d) of Regulation S-K, “Securities Authorized for
Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans,” we are providing
the following information summarizing information about our equity
compensation plans as of December 28, 2018. All share numbers have
been updated for the 1-for-12 reverse stock split of the
Company’s common stock effective as of December 7,
2017.
Plan
category
|
Number of
securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options and
rights
|
Weighted average
exercise price of outstanding options, warrants, and
rights
|
Number of
securities remaining available for future
issuance
|
Equity compensation
plans approved by security holders
|
160,831
|
$5.86
|
296,530
|
Our
Command Center, Inc. 2016 Employee Stock Incentive Plan was adopted
by our Board of Directors on September 29, 2016 and approved by our
stockholders at the 2016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders on November
17, 2016. We have previously provided the material terms of such
plan.
Transfer Agent and Registrar
Our
transfer agent is Continental Stock Transfer & Trust, located
at 17 Battery Street, 8th Floor, New York, New York,
10004.
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
In
September 2017, our Board of Directors authorized a $5.0 million
three-year repurchase plan of our common stock. This plan replaces
the previously implemented plan, which was put in place in April
2015. During 2018 we purchased approximately 324,000 shares of
common stock at an aggregate price of approximately $1.8 million
resulting in an average price of $5.65 per share under the plan.
These shares were then retired. During 2017 we purchased
approximately 69,000 shares of common stock at an aggregate price
of approximately $374,000 resulting in an average price of $5.45
per share under the plan. These shares were then retired. We have
approximately $2.8 million remaining under the repurchase plan as
of December 28, 2018. For additional information related to our
stock repurchase see Note 6
– Stockholders’ Equity in our notes to the
consolidated financial statements. The table below summarizes our
common stock purchased during the fourth quarter of
2018.
|
Total shares
purchased
|
Average price
per share
|
Total number of
shares purchased as part of publicly announced
plan
|
Approximate
dollar value of shares that may be purchased under the
plan
|
September 29, 2018
to October 26, 2018
|
12,642
|
$5.51
|
883,435
|
$2,888,566
|
October 27, 2018 to
November 23, 2018
|
14,153
|
4.40
|
897,588
|
2,826,254
|
November 24, 2018
to December 28, 2018
|
7,258
|
4.05
|
904,846
|
2,796,828
|
Total
|
34,053
|
|
|
|
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL
DATA
As a
“smaller reporting company,” as defined by Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act and in Item 10(f)(1) of Regulation S-K, we are
electing scaled disclosure reporting obligations and therefore are
not required to provide the information requested by this
Item.
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND
ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITIONS AND RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS
The
following discussion reviews significant factors with respect to
our financial condition at December 28, 2018, and results of
operations for the fiscal years ended December 28, 2018 and
December 29, 2017. This discussion should be read in conjunction
with the consolidated financial statements, notes, tables, and
selected financial data presented elsewhere in this Form
10-K.
Our
discussion and analysis contains forward-looking statements that
are provided to assist in the understanding of anticipated future
financial performance. However, such performance involves risks and
uncertainties that may cause actual results to differ materially
from those discussed in such forward-looking statements. A
cautionary statement regarding forward-looking statements is set
forth under the caption “Special Note Regarding
Forward-Looking Statements” immediately prior to Item 1 of
this Form 10-K. This discussion and analysis should be considered
in light of such cautionary statements and the risk factors
disclosed elsewhere in this Form
10-K.
The
following table reflects operating results from 2018 and 2017 (in
thousands, except per share amounts and percentages). Percentages
indicate line items as a percentage of total revenue. The table
serves as the basis for the narrative discussion that
follows.
|
Fifty-two weeks ended
|
|||
|
December 28, 2018
|
December 29, 2017
|
||
Revenue
|
$97,389
|
100.0%
|
$98,072
|
100.0%
|
Cost
of staffing services
|
72,450
|
74.4%
|
72,642
|
74.1%
|
Gross
profit
|
24,939
|
25.6%
|
25,430
|
25.9%
|
Selling,
general and administrative expenses
|
23,434
|
24.1%
|
21,347
|
21.8%
|
Depreciation
and amortization
|
324
|
0.3%
|
386
|
0.4%
|
Income
from operations
|
1,181
|
1.2%
|
3,697
|
3.8%
|
Interest
expense and other financing expense
|
2
|
0.0%
|
12
|
0.0%
|
Net income before
income taxes
|
1,179
|
1.2%
|
3,685
|
3.8%
|
Provision for
income taxes
|
205
|
0.2%
|
2,006
|
2.0%
|
Net
income
|
$974
|
1.0%
|
$1,679
|
1.7%
|
Non-GAAP
data
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted
EBITDA
|
$4,074
|
4.2%
|
$4,240
|
4.3%
|
Because
we use adjusted EBITDA to evaluate our financial performance, we
reconcile it to net income, which is the most comparable financial
measure calculated and presented in accordance with U.S.
GAAP.
|
Fifty-two weeks ended
|
|
|
December 28, 2018
|
December 29, 2017
|
Net
income
|
$974
|
$1,679
|
Interest
expense
|
2
|
12
|
Provision
for income taxes
|
205
|
2,006
|
Depreciation
and amortization
|
324
|
386
|
Non-cash
compensation
|
395
|
157
|
Reserve
for workers' compensation deposit
|
1,540
|
-
|
Other
non-recurring expense
|
634
|
-
|
Adjusted
EBITDA
|
$4,074
|
$4,240
|
Earnings
before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, non-cash
compensation, and certain non-recurring charges, or adjusted
EBITDA, is a non-GAAP measure that represents our net income before
interest expense, income tax expense, depreciation and
amortization, non-cash compensation, and certain nonrecurring
charges. We utilize adjusted EBITDA as a financial measure as
management believes investors find it a useful tool to perform more
meaningful comparisons and evaluations of past, present, and future
operating results. We believe it is a complement to net income and
other financial performance measures. Adjusted EBITDA is not
intended to represent net income as defined by generally accepted
accounting principles in the United States, or U.S. GAAP, and such
information should not be considered as an alternative to net
income or any other measure of performance prescribed by U.S.
GAAP.
We use
adjusted EBITDA to measure our financial performance because we
believe interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, non-cash
compensation, and certain non-recurring charges bear little or no
relationship to our operating performance. By excluding interest
expense, adjusted EBITDA measures our financial performance
irrespective of our capital structure or how we finance our
operations. By excluding taxes on income, we believe adjusted
EBITDA provides a basis for measuring the financial performance of
our operations excluding factors that are beyond our control. By
excluding depreciation and amortization expense, adjusted EBITDA
measures the financial performance of our operations without regard
to their historical cost. By excluding non-cash compensation,
adjusted EBITDA provides a basis for measuring the financial
performance of our operations excluding the value of our stock and
stock option awards. In addition, by excluding certain
non-recurring charges, adjusted EBITDA provides a basis for
measuring financial performance without non-recurring charges. For
all of these reasons, we believe that adjusted EBITDA provides us,
and investors, with information that is relevant and useful in
evaluating our business.
However,
because adjusted EBITDA excludes depreciation and amortization, it
does not measure the capital we require to maintain or preserve our
fixed assets. In addition, because adjusted EBITDA does not reflect
interest expense, it does not take into account the total amount of
interest we pay on outstanding debt, nor does it show trends in
interest costs due to changes in our financing or changes in
interest rates. Adjusted EBITDA, as defined by us, may not be
comparable to adjusted EBITDA as reported by other companies that
do not define adjusted EBITDA exactly as we define the
term.
Results of Operations
Fifty-two weeks ended December 28, 2018
Summary of Operations: Revenue was $97.4 million in
2018, compared to $98.1 million in 2017, a decrease of
approximately $683,000, or 0.7%. This decrease is primarily related
to lower revenue in the second and third quarter of 2018 due to
higher than normal turnover in sales positions and some seasonality
in the periods.
Our
branches serve a wide variety of customers and industries across 22
states. Our individual branch revenue can fluctuate significantly
on both a quarter-over-quarter and year-over-year basis depending
on the local economic conditions and need for temporary labor
services in the local economy. One of our goals is to increase the
diversity of customers and industries we service at both the branch
and the company level. We believe this will reduce the potential
negative impact of an economic downturn in any one industry or
region.
Cost of Staffing Services: Cost of staffing services
was 74.4% of revenue in 2018, compared to 74.1% in 2017, an
increase of 0.3%. This relative increase was due to higher
compensation paid to our field team members related to competitive
forces in a tightening labor market, as well as increases in
minimum wages in some states in which we operate. We also saw a
relative increase in workers’ compensation insurance costs,
which can fluctuate as a result of changes to the mix of work
performed during the year, changes in our claims history and
ongoing claims management, and changes in actuarial assumptions.
These increases were partially offset by a relative decrease in our
state unemployment insurance costs as we have continued to actively
manage this part of our business.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses, or
SG&A: SG&A was
approximately $23.4 million in 2018, compared to $21.3 million in
2017, an increase of approximately $2.1 million. This increase is
due to several non-recurring charges that occurred in 2018. These
non-recurring charges include a $1.5 million impairment of our
workers’ compensation deposit in receivership, executive
severance of approximately $565,000, a one-time $100,000 expense
related to the settlement of the 2018 proxy contest, and other
legal and professional fees of approximately $167,000. These
non-recurring expenses total approximately $2.4 million, or 10% of
our SG&A. Other increases in SG&A included an increase in
recruiting costs, employee medical benefits, stock based
compensation, and payroll and payroll related taxes. These other
increases were offset by decreases in bad debt expense, and a
refund of our workers’ compensation risk pool deposit in
excess of what was recorded of approximately
$198,000.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
We
believe that our cash flow from operations, working capital
balances at December 28, 2018, and access to our account purchase
agreement, will be sufficient to fund anticipated operations
through March 2020.
At
December 28, 2018, our current assets exceeded our current
liabilities by approximately $14.0 million. Included in current
assets is cash of approximately $8.0 million, and trade accounts
receivable of approximately $9.0 million. Included in current
liabilities are accrued wages and benefits of approximately $1.2
million, and the current portion of workers’ compensation
claims liability of approximately $1.0 million.
Our
current financing agreement is an account purchase agreement with
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., which allows us to sell eligible accounts
receivable for 90% of the invoiced amount on a full recourse basis
up to the facility maximum, or $14.0 million at December 28, 2018.
When the receivable is collected, the remaining 10% is paid to us,
less applicable fees and interest. The liability related to this
account purchase agreement facility was approximately $399,000 and
$854,000 at December 28, 2018 and at December 29, 2017,
respectively. The term of the agreement is through April 7, 2020
and bears interest at the Daily One Month London Interbank Offered
Rate plus 2.50% per annum. At December 28, 2018 the effective
interest rate was 5.02%. Interest is payable on the actual amount
advanced. Additional charges include an annual facility fee equal
to 0.50% of the facility threshold in place and lockbox fees. As
collateral for repayment of any and all obligations, we granted
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. a security interest in all of our property
including, but not limited to, accounts receivable, intangible
assets, contract rights, investment property, deposit accounts, and
other such assets. We also have an outstanding letter of credit
under this agreement in the amount of $6.2 million which reduces
the amount of funds otherwise made available to us under this
agreement. As of December 28, 2018 we had approximately $2,000 of
availability on this facility.
Operating Activities: Net cash provided by
operating activities totaled approximately $2.6 million in 2018,
compared to $4.7 million in 2017. Operating activity in 2018
included net income of approximately $1.0 million, an increase in
the reserve on our workers’ compensation risk pool deposit in
receivership of approximately $1.5 million, a decrease of
approximately $359,000 in prepaid expense, deposits, and other
assets, and a decrease in accounts receivable of approximately
$282,000. These were offset by a decrease of approximately $526,000
in accrued wages and benefits and a decrease of approximately
$343,000 in accounts payable. Operating activity in 2017 included
net income of approximately $1.7 million, a decrease of
approximately $1.7 million in our deferred tax asset, a decrease of
approximately $683,000 in accounts receivable, an increase of
approximately $503,000 in other current liabilities, and a decrease
of approximately $578,000 in prepaid workers’ compensation.
These were offset by a decrease of approximately $758,000 in our
workers’ compensation claims liability and a decrease of
approximately $199,000 in accounts payable.
Investing Activities: Net cash used in investing
activities totaled approximately $117,000 in 2018, compared to
approximately $104,000 in 2017. Investing activity in both years
related primarily to the purchase of equipment.
Financing Activities: Net cash used in financing
activities totaled approximately $2.3 million in 2018, compared to
net cash provided by financing activities of approximately $90,000
in 2017. Financing activities in 2018 included $1.8 million used to
purchase treasury stock and net cash used to decrease our account
purchase facility of approximately $455,000. Financing activity in
2017 included net cash provided by our account purchase facility of
approximately $465,000 and $375,000 used to purchase treasury
stock.
Critical Accounting Policies
Management's
discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of
operations are based upon our financial statements, which have been
prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP. The preparation of these
financial statements requires management to make estimates and
judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities,
revenues and expenses and the related disclosure of contingent
assets and liabilities. Management bases its estimates and judgments on
historical experience and on various other factors that are
believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of
which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying value
of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other
sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under
different assumptions or conditions.
Management believes that the following accounting policies are the
most critical to aid in fully understanding and evaluating our
reported financial results, and they require management’s
most difficult, subjective, or complex judgments, resulting from
the need to make estimates about the effect of matters that are
inherently uncertain. For additional information
related to our critical accounting policies see Note 1 – Summary of Significant
Accounting Policies in our notes to the consolidated
financial statements.
Workers’ Compensation Reserves: In
accordance with the terms of our workers’ compensation
liability insurance policy, we maintain reserves for workers’
compensation claims to cover our cost of all claims. We use third
party actuarial estimates of the future costs of the claims and
related expenses discounted by a 5% present value interest rate to
determine the amount of our reserves. We evaluate the reserves
quarterly and make adjustments as needed. If the actual cost of the
claims incurred and related expenses exceed the amounts estimated,
additional reserves may be required.
Accounts Receivable and Allowance for Doubtful
Accounts: Accounts receivable are carried at
their estimated recoverable amount, net of allowances. The
allowance for doubtful accounts is determined based on historical
write-off experience, age of receivable, other qualitative factors
and extenuating circumstances, and current economic data and
represents our best estimate of the amount of probable losses on
our accounts receivable. The allowance for doubtful accounts is
reviewed monthly, and past due balances are written-off when it is
probable that the receivable will not be collected. Our allowance
for doubtful accounts was approximately $113,000 and $282,000 at
December 28, 2018 and December 29, 2017, respectively.
Goodwill and Intangible Assets: Goodwill
represents the excess purchase price over the fair value of
identifiable assets received attributable to business acquisitions
and combinations. Goodwill is measured for impairment at least
annually and whenever events and circumstances arise that indicate
impairment may exist, such as a significant adverse change in the
business climate. In assessing the value of goodwill, an entity
compares the carrying amount of a reporting unit to its fair value.
If the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value,
an entity is required to recognize an impairment charge to goodwill
equal to that difference, up to the carrying value of goodwill. We
assess goodwill for impairment on an annual basis as of the last
day of our fiscal year.
Intangible
assets with definite lives are amortized over the estimated useful
lives and are reviewed for impairment at lease annually and
whenever events and circumstances arise that indicate impairment
may exist.
Income Taxes: We account for income taxes under
the liability method, whereby deferred income tax liabilities or
assets at the end of each period are determined using the enacted
tax rate expected to be in effect when the taxes are actually paid
or recovered. A valuation allowance is recognized on deferred tax
assets when it is more likely than not that some or all of these
deferred tax assets will not be realized. Our policy is to
prescribe a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the
recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to
be taken in a tax return.
We have
analyzed our filing positions in all jurisdictions where we are
required to file returns and found no positions that would require
a liability for unrecognized income tax positions to be recognized.
In the event that we are assessed penalties and/or interest,
penalties will be charged to other financing expense and interest
will be charged to interest expense.
Share-Based
Compensation: Periodically,
we issue common shares or options to purchase our common shares to
our officers, directors, employees, or other parties. Compensation
expense for these equity awards are recognized straight-line over
the service period, based on the fair value on the grant date. We
recognize compensation expense for only the portion of options that
are expected to vest, rather than record forfeitures when they
occur. If the actual number of forfeitures differs from those
estimated by management, additional adjustments to compensation
expense may be required in the future periods. We determine the
fair value of equity awards using the Black-Scholes valuation model
for stock options and the quoted market price for stock
awards.
Impairment of Long-lived Asset: We review the
carrying values of our long-lived assets, including property, plant
and equipment, and intangible assets whenever events or changes in
circumstances indicate that such carrying values may not be
recoverable. Long-lived assets are carried at historical cost if
the projected cash flows from their use will recover their carrying
amounts on an undiscounted basis without considering interest. If
projected cash flows are less than their carrying value, the
long-lived assets are reduced to their estimated fair value.
Considerable judgement is required to project such cash flows and,
if required, estimate the fair value of the impaired long-lived
assets.
ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE
DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
We are
a “smaller reporting company” as defined by Regulation
S-K and as such, we are not providing the information contained in
this item pursuant to Regulation S-K.
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND
SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting
Firm
To the
Stockholders and Board of Directors of
Command
Center, Inc.
Lakewood,
Colorado
Opinion on the Consolidated Financial Statements
We have
audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Command
Center, Inc. (the “Company”) as of December 28, 2018,
the related consolidated statement of income, stockholders' equity,
and cash flows for the fifty-two weeks ended December 28, 2018 and
the related notes (collectively referred to as the “financial
statements”). In our opinion, the financial statements
referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the
financial position of the Company as of December 28, 2018, and the
results of its operations and its cash flows for the fifty-two
weeks ended December 28, 2018, in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of
America.
Basis for Opinion
The
Company's management is responsible for these financial statements.
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s
financial statements based on our audits. We are a public
accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”) and are
required to be independent with respect to the Company in
accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable
rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and
the PCAOB.
We
conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB.
Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to
obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements
are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud.
The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to
perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting.
As part of our audit we are required to obtain an understanding of
internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose
of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's
internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express
no such opinion.
Our
audit included performing procedures to assess the risks of
material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to
error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those
risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis,
evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial
statements. Our audit also included evaluating the accounting
principles used and significant estimates made by management, as
well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial
statements. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis
for our opinion.
/s/
Plante & Moran, PLLC
We have
served as the Company’s auditor since 2017.
Denver,
Colorado
April
9, 2019
Report of Independent Public Accounting Firm
To the Shareholders and Board of Directors of
Command Center, Inc.
Lakewood, Colorado
OPINION ON THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of
Command Center, Inc. (the “Company”) as of
December 29, 2017, and the related consolidated statement of
income, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows, for the
fifty-two weeks ended December 29, 2017, and the related notes
(collectively referred to as the “financial
statements”).
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present
fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the
Company as of December 29, 2017, and the results of its
operations and its cash flows for the fifty-two weeks ended
December 29, 2017, in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America.
BASIS FOR OPINION
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the
PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits
to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial
statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error
or fraud.
/s/ EKS&H LLLP
March 29, 2018
Denver, Colorado
Command Center, Inc.
Consolidated Balance Sheets
|
December 28,
2018
|
December 29,
2017
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
Current
assets
|
|
|
Cash
|
$7,934,287
|
$7,768,631
|
Restricted
cash
|
69,423
|
12,853
|
Accounts
receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts
|
9,041,361
|
9,394,376
|
Prepaid expenses,
deposits, and other assets
|
380,930
|
740,280
|
Prepaid workers'
compensation
|
212,197
|
167,597
|
Current portion of
workers' compensation deposits
|
-
|
99,624
|
Total current
assets
|
17,638,198
|
18,183,361
|
Property and
equipment, net
|
329,255
|
372,145
|
Deferred
taxes
|
1,079,908
|
721,602
|
Workers'
compensation risk pool deposit, less current portion,
net
|
193,984
|
201,563
|
Workers'
compensation risk pool deposit in receivership, net
|
260,000
|
1,800,000
|
Goodwill and other
intangible assets, net
|
3,930,900
|
4,085,576
|
Total
assets
|
$23,432,245
|
$25,364,247
|
LIABILITIES
AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
|
|
|
Current
liabilities
|
|
|
Accounts
payable
|
$219,945
|
$563,402
|
Account purchase
agreement facility
|
398,894
|
853,562
|
Other current
liabilities
|
821,142
|
898,809
|
Accrued wages and
benefits
|
1,218,699
|
1,503,688
|
Current portion of
workers' compensation claims liability
|
1,003,643
|
1,031,500
|
Total current
liabilities
|
3,662,323
|
4,850,961
|
Workers'
compensation claims liability, less current portion
|
878,455
|
917,497
|
Total
liabilities
|
4,504,778
|
5,768,458
|
Commitments and
contingencies (Note 9)
|
|
|
Stockholders'
equity
|
|
|
Preferred stock -
$0.001 par value, 416,666 shares authorized; none
issued
|
-
|
-
|
Common stock -
$0.001 par value, 8,333,333 shares authorized; 4,680,871 and
4,993,672 shares issued and outstanding, respectively
|
4,681
|
4,994
|
Additional paid-in
capital
|
54,536,852
|
56,211,837
|
Accumulated
deficit
|
(35,650,066)
|
(36,621,042)
|
Total stockholders'
equity
|
18,891,467
|
19,595,789
|
Total liabilities
and stockholders' equity
|
$23,432,245
|
$25,364,247
|
Command Center, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Income
|
Fifty-two weeks ended
|
|
|
December 28, 2018
|
December 29, 2017
|
Revenue
|
$97,388,820
|
$98,072,198
|
Cost
of staffing services
|
72,450,295
|
72,641,609
|
Gross
profit
|
24,938,525
|
25,430,589
|
Selling,
general and administrative expenses
|
23,433,198
|
21,347,681
|
Depreciation
and amortization
|
323,852
|
386,413
|
Income
from operations
|
1,181,475
|
3,696,495
|
Interest
expense and other financing expense
|
2,116
|
11,619
|
Net income before
income taxes
|
1,179,359
|
3,684,876
|
Provision for
income taxes
|
205,072
|
2,005,528
|
Net
income
|
$974,287
|
$1,679,348
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share:
|
|
|
Basic
|
$0.20
|
$0.33
|
Diluted
|
$0.20
|
$0.33
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding:
|
|
|
Basic
|
4,853,000
|
5,043,254
|
Diluted
|
4,855,019
|
5,105,006
|
Command Center, Inc.
Consolidated Statement of Changes in Stockholders’
Equity
|
Common
stock
|
Additional
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
paid-in
|
Accumulated
|
stockholders'
|
|
|
Shares
|
Par
value
|
capital
|
deficit
|
equity
|
Balance
at December 30, 2016
|
5,052,888
|
$5,053
|
$56,430,206
|
$(38,300,390)
|
$18,134,869
|
Common
stock issued for services
|
9,583
|
10
|
49,690
|
-
|
49,700
|
Stock-based
compensation
|
-
|
-
|
107,090
|
-
|
107,090
|
Common
stock purchased and retired
|
(68,799)
|
(69)
|
(375,149)
|
-
|
(375,218)
|
Net
income for the year
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
1,679,348
|
1,679,348
|
Balance
at December 29, 2017
|
4,993,672
|
4,994
|
56,211,837
|
(36,621,042)
|
19,595,789
|
Common
stock issued for services
|
10,973
|
11
|
62,425
|
-
|
62,436
|
Stock-based
compensation
|
-
|
-
|
332,089
|
-
|
332,089
|
Common
stock purchased and retired
|
(323,774)
|
(324)
|
(1,828,829)
|
-
|
(1,829,153)
|
Cumulative
effect of accounting change
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(3,311)
|
(3,311)
|
Effective
repurchase of stock options
|
|
|
(240,670)
|
-
|
(240,670)
|
Net
income for the year
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
974,287
|
974,287
|
Balance
at December 28, 2018
|
4,680,871
|
$4,681
|
$54,536,852
|
$(35,650,066)
|
$18,891,467
|
Command Center, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flow
|
Fifty-two weeks ended
|
|
|
December 28, 2018
|
December 29, 2017
|
Cash flows from operating activities
|
|
|
Net
income
|
$974,287
|
$1,679,348
|
Adjustments
to reconcile net income to net cash provided by
operations:
|
|
|
Depreciation
and amortization
|
323,852
|
386,413
|
Provision
for bad debt
|
71,278
|
209,805
|
Stock
based compensation
|
332,089
|
156,790
|
Deferred
taxes
|
(358,306)
|
1,666,043
|
Reserve
on workers' compensation risk pool deposit in
receivership
|
1,540,000
|
-
|
Cumulative
effect of accounting change
|
(3,311)
|
-
|
Common
stock issued for services
|
62,436
|
-
|
Gain
on disposition of property and equipment
|
(9,383)
|
-
|
Changes
in operating assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
Accounts
receivable
|
281,737
|
683,273
|
Prepaid
expenses, deposits, and other assets
|
359,350
|
(106,665)
|
Prepaid
workers' compensation
|
(44,600)
|
578,100
|
Accounts
payable
|
(343,457)
|
(198,875)
|
Other
current liabilities
|
(77,667)
|
502,883
|
Accrued
wages and benefits
|
(525,659)
|
(63,897)
|
Workers'
compensation risk pool deposits
|
107,203
|
12,153
|
Workers'
compensation claims liability
|
(66,899)
|
(757,703)
|
Net
cash provided by operating activities
|
2,622,950
|
4,747,668
|
Cash flows from investing activities
|
|
|
Purchase
of property and equipment
|
(158,578)
|
(103,665)
|
Proceeds
from the sale of property and equipment
|
41,675
|
-
|
Net
cash used in investing activities
|
(116,903)
|
(103,665)
|
Cash flows from financing activities
|
|
|
Net
change in account purchase agreement facility
|
(454,668)
|
465,282
|
Purchase
of treasury stock
|
(1,829,153)
|
(375,218)
|
Net
cash (used in) provided by financing activities
|
(2,283,821)
|
90,064
|
Net increase in cash
|
222,226
|
4,734,067
|
Cash and restricted cash, beginning of period
|
7,781,484
|
3,047,417
|
Cash and restricted cash, end of period
|
$8,003,710
|
$7,781,484
|
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash activities
|
|
|
Effective
purchase of vested stock options
|
240,670
|
-
|
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information
|
|
|
Interest
paid
|
3,503
|
11,620
|
Income
taxes paid
|
18,227
|
522,525
|
Reconciliation of cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
Cash
|
$7,934,287
|
$7,768,631
|
Restricted
cash
|
69,423
|
12,853
|
Total cash and restricted
cash
|
$8,003,710
|
$7,781,484
|
Command Center, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
NOTE 1 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING
POLICIES
Description of Business: Command Center, Inc.
("Command Center,” the “Company,”
“CCI,” “we,” "us," or “our”) is
a leading provider of on-demand labor in the staffing industry. Our
customers are primarily small to mid-sized businesses in the
industrial/manufacturing/warehousing, construction, hospitality,
transportation, and retail industries. At December 28, 2018 we
operated 67 branches in 22 states. Our corporate headquarter is in
Lakewood, Colorado.
Basis of Presentation: The consolidated financial
statements include the accounts of Command Center and all
wholly-owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany balances
and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. The
consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes are
prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America, or U.S.
GAAP.
Use of Estimates: The preparation of consolidated
financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires us to
make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of
assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and
liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements
and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the
reporting period. Actual results could differ from those
estimates.
Revenue
Recognition: On
December 30, 2017, we adopted new revenue recognition guidance
using the modified retrospective method for all open contracts and
related amendments. Results for reporting periods beginning after
December 30, 2017 are presented under the new revenue recognition
guidance, while prior period amounts were not adjusted and continue
to be reported in accordance with historic accounting guidance. The
adoption of this new guidance did not have a material impact on our
consolidated financial statements.
We account for revenue when both parties to the contract have
approved the contract, the rights and obligations of the parties
are identified, payment terms are identified, and collectability of
consideration is probable. Our primary source
of revenue is from providing temporary contract labor to our
customers. Revenue is recognized at the time we satisfy our
performance obligation. Our contracts have a single performance
obligation, which is the transfer of services. Because our
customers receive and consume the benefits of our services
simultaneously, our performance obligations are typically satisfied
when our services are provided. Revenue is reported net of customer
credits, discounts, and taxes collected from customers that are
remitted to taxing authorities. Our customers are invoiced every
week and we do not require payment prior to the delivery of
service. Substantially all of our contracts include payment terms
of 30 days or less and are short-term in nature. Because of our
payment terms with our customers, there are no significant contract
assets or liabilities. We do not extend payment terms beyond one
year.
|
Fifty-two weeks ended
|
|||
|
December 28, 2018
|
December 29, 2017
|
||
Industrial,
manufacturing and warehousing
|
$34,207,786
|
35.1%
|
$33,495,618
|
34.2%
|
Construction
|
18,462,347
|
19.0%
|
19,988,048
|
20.4%
|
Hospitality
|
16,480,095
|
16.9%
|
18,304,637
|
18.7%
|
Transportation
|
15,322,125
|
15.7%
|
14,046,085
|
14.3%
|
Retail
and Other
|
12,916,467
|
13.3%
|
12,237,810
|
12.4%
|
Total
|
$97,388,820
|
100.0%
|
$98,072,198
|
100.0%
|
Cost of Staffing Services: Cost of services
includes the wages of field team members, related payroll taxes,
workers’ compensation expenses, and other direct costs of
services. We do not include branch level costs in this calculation
such as rent, branch manager salary, or other branch level
operating expenses.
Accounts Receivable and Allowance for Doubtful
Accounts: Accounts receivable are carried at
their estimated recoverable amount, net of allowances. The
allowance for doubtful accounts is determined based on historical
write-off experience, age of receivable, other qualitative factors
and extenuating circumstances, and current economic data and
represents our best estimate of the amount of probable losses on
our accounts receivable. The allowance for doubtful accounts is
reviewed each period and past due balances are written-off when it
is probable that the receivable will not be collected. Our
allowance for doubtful accounts was approximately $113,000 and
$282,000, at December 28, 2018 and December 29, 2017,
respectively.
Property and Equipment: Property and equipment
are recorded at cost. We compute depreciation using the
straight-line method over the estimated useful lives, typically
three to five years. Leasehold improvements are capitalized and
amortized over the shorter of the non-cancelable lease term or
their useful lives. Repairs and maintenance are expensed as
incurred. When assets are sold or retired, cost and accumulated
depreciation are eliminated from the consolidated balance sheet and
gain or loss is reflected in the consolidated statement of
income.
Workers’ Compensation Reserves: In
accordance with the terms of our workers’ compensation
liability insurance policy, we maintain reserves for workers’
compensation claims to cover our cost of all claims. We use third
party actuarial estimates of the future costs of the claims and
related expenses discounted by a 5% present value interest rate to
determine the amount of our reserves. We evaluate the reserves
quarterly and make adjustments as needed. If the actual cost of the
claims incurred and related expenses exceed the amounts estimated,
additional reserves may be required.
Goodwill and Intangible Assets: Goodwill
represents the excess purchase price over the fair value of
identifiable assets received attributable to business acquisitions
and combinations. Goodwill is measured for impairment at least
annually and whenever events and circumstances arise that indicate
impairment may exist, such as a significant adverse change in the
business climate. In assessing the value of goodwill, an entity
compares the carrying amount of a reporting unit to its fair value.
If the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value,
an entity is required to recognize an impairment charge to goodwill
equal to that difference, up to the carrying value of goodwill. We
assess goodwill for impairment on an annual basis as of the last
day of our fiscal year.
Intangible
assets with definite lives are amortized over the estimated useful
lives and are reviewed for impairment at lease annually and
whenever events and circumstances arise that indicate impairment
may exist.
Income Taxes: We account for income taxes under
the liability method, whereby deferred income tax liabilities or
assets at the end of each period are determined using the enacted
tax rate expected to be in effect when the taxes are actually paid
or recovered. A valuation allowance is recognized on deferred tax
assets when it is more likely than not that some or all of these
deferred tax assets will not be realized. Our policy is to
prescribe a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the
recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to
be taken in a tax return.
We have
analyzed our filing positions in all jurisdictions where we are
required to file returns, and found no positions that would require
a liability for unrecognized income tax positions to be recognized.
In the event that we are assessed penalties and/or interest,
penalties will be charged to other financing expense and interest
will be charged to interest expense.
Earnings per Share: Basic earnings per share is
calculated by dividing net income or loss available to common
stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares
outstanding, and does not include the impact of any potentially
dilutive common stock equivalents. Diluted earnings per share
reflect the potential dilution of securities that could share in
our earnings through the conversion of common shares issuable via
outstanding stock warrants, and/or stock options. We had common
stock equivalents outstanding to purchase 160,831 and 254,995
shares of common stock at December 28, 2018 and December 29,
2017, respectively. If we incur losses in the periods presented, or
if conversion into common shares is anti-dilutive, basic and
dilutive earnings per share are equal.
Diluted
common shares outstanding were calculated using the Treasury Stock
Method and are as follows:
|
December 28, 2018
|
December 29, 2017
|
Weighted
average number of common shares used in basic net income per common
share
|
4,853,000
|
5,043,254
|
Dilutive
effects of stock options
|
2,019
|
61,752
|
Weighted
average number of common shares used in diluted net income per
common share
|
4,855,019
|
5,105,006
|
Share-Based Compensation: Periodically, we issue
common shares or options to purchase our common shares to our
officers, directors, employees, or other parties. Compensation
expense for these equity awards are recognized straight-line over
the service period, based on the fair value on the grant date. We
recognize compensation expense for only the portion of options that
are expected to vest, rather than record forfeitures when they
occur. If the actual number of forfeitures differs from those
estimated by management, additional adjustments to compensation
expense may be required in the future periods. We determine the
fair value of equity awards using the Black-Scholes valuation model
for stock options and the quoted market price for stock
awards.
Advertising Costs: Advertising costs consist
primarily of print and other promotional activities. We expense
advertisements as incurred and totaled approximately $32,000 and
$33,000 during the fiscal years ended December 28, 2018 and
December 29, 2017, respectively.
Concentrations: At December 28, 2018, 27.4% of
total accounts payable were due to two vendors and 12.9% of total
accounts receivable was due from a single customer. At December 29,
2017, 44.8% of total accounts payable were due to two vendors and
11.8% of total accounts receivable was due from a single
customer.
Impairment of Long-lived Asset: We review the
carrying values of our long-lived assets, including property, plant
and equipment, and intangible assets whenever events or changes in
circumstances indicate that such carrying values may not be
recoverable. Long-lived assets are carried at historical cost if
the projected cash flows from their use will recover their carrying
amounts on an undiscounted basis without considering interest. If
projected cash flows are less than their carrying value, the
long-lived assets are reduced to their estimated fair value.
Considerable judgement is required to project such cash flows and,
if required, estimate the fair value of the impaired long-lived
assets.
Fair Value of
Financial Instruments: We carry financial
instruments on the consolidated balance sheet at the fair value of
the instruments as of the consolidated balance sheet date. At the
end of each period, management assesses the fair value of each
instrument and adjusts the carrying value to reflect its
assessment. At December 28, 2018 and December 29, 2017, the
carrying values of our account purchse agreement, accounts
receivable, and accounts payable approximated their fair values due
to relatively short maturities.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements: In February
2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board, or FASB, issued
Accounting Standards Update, or ASU, 2016-02 amending the existing
accounting standards for lease accounting and requiring lessees to
recognize a right-of-use asset and a corresponding lease
liabilities for all leases with a term of more than 12 months,
including those classified as operating leases. Both the asset and
liability will initially be measured at the present value of the
future minimum lease payments, with the asset being subject to
adjustments such as initial direct costs. This ASU is
effective for annual periods, and interim periods within those
annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2018.
During the third quarter of 2018, the
FASB issued updated guidance that provides companies with the
option to apply a practical expedient that allows adoption of the
provisions of the new lease accounting guidance prospectively, with
a cumulative-effect adjustment recorded to retained earnings upon
the date of adoption. We have elected to adopt the standard using
the practical expedient provided in the third quarter and
adopt the guidance prospectively on
the effective date. As a result of adopting this standard, we
expect to recognize a right -of-use asset and lease liability of
approximately $2.1 million. We do not expect the adoption of
this standard to have a material impact on expense
recognition.
In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13, “Financial
Instruments – Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of
Credit Losses on Financial Instruments.” The standard
significantly changes how entities will measure credit losses for
most financial assets and certain other instruments that are not
measured at fair value through net income. The standard will
replace todays “incurred loss” approach with an
“expected loss” model for instruments measured at
amortized cost. For available-for-sale securities, entities will be
required to record allowances rather than reduce the carrying
amount, as they do today under the other-than-temporary impairment
model. It also simplifies the accounting model for purchased
credit-impaired debt securities and loans. This guidance is
effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2019, and
interim periods therein. Early adoption is permitted for annual
periods beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim periods
therein. We are currently evaluating the impact of the new guidance
on our consolidated financial statements and related
disclosures.
In November 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-18, “Statement of
Cash Flows (Topic 230) Restricted Cash.” The new guidance
requires that the reconciliation of the beginning-of-period and
end-of-period amounts shown in the statement of cash flows include
restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents. If restricted cash
is presented separately from cash and cash equivalents on the
balance sheet, companies will be required to reconcile the amounts
presented on the statement of cash flows to the amounts on the
balance sheet. Companies also need to disclose information about
the nature of the restrictions. This guidance is effective for
fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, and the interim
periods within those fiscal years. We adopted this guidance during
the first quarter of 2017.
In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board, or FASB,
issued new revenue recognition guidance under Accounting Standards
Update, or ASU, 2014-09 that supersedes the existing revenue
recognition guidance under U.S. GAAP. The new standard focuses on
creating a single source of revenue guidance for revenue arising
from contracts with customers for all industries. The objective of
the new standard is for companies to recognize revenue when it
transfers the promised goods or services to its customers at an
amount that represents what the company expects to be entitled to
in exchange for those goods or services. The new standard became
effective for us beginning December 30, 2017. We implemented the
standard using the modified retrospective approach which recognized
the cumulative effect of application on that date. As a result of
adopting this new standard, we made an adjustment that increased
Revenue on our Consolidated Statement of Income and decreased
Accumulated deficit on our Consolidated Balance Sheet by
approximately $3,000. We have applied the guidance in this new
standard to all contracts at the date of initial
application.
In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-04, “Intangibles
– Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Simplifying the Test for
Goodwill Impairment.” The new guidance simplifies the
subsequent measurement of goodwill by eliminating the requirement
to perform a Step 2 impairment test to compute the implied fair
value of goodwill. Instead, companies will only compare the fair
value of a reporting unit to its carrying value (Step 1) and
recognize an impairment charge for the amount by which the carrying
amount exceeds the reporting unit’s fair value; however, the
loss recognized may not exceed the total amount of goodwill
allocated to that reporting unit. Additionally, an entity should
consider income tax effects from any tax-deductible goodwill on the
carrying amount of the reporting unit when measuring the goodwill
impairment loss, if applicable. This amended guidance is effective
for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after December 15,
2019, with early adoption permitted for interim or annual goodwill
impairment tests performed on testing dates after January 1,
2017. We adopted this guidance during our fiscal year
2018.
Other accounting standards that have been issued by the Financial
Accounting Standards Board or other standards-setting bodies are
not expected to have a material impact on our financial position,
results of operations, and cash flows. For the period ended
December 28, 2018, the adoption of other accounting standards had
no material impact on our financial positions, results of
operations, or cash flows.
NOTE 2 – PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT
The
following table summarizes the book value of our assets and
accumulated depreciation and amortization:
|
December 28, 2018
|
December 29, 2017
|
Leasehold
improvements
|
$289,576
|
$268,586
|
Vehicles
and machinery
|
73,955
|
100,467
|
Furniture
and fixtures
|
127,992
|
127,992
|
Computer
hardware and licensed software
|
634,117
|
502,309
|
Accumulated
depreciation and amortization
|
(796,385)
|
(627,209)
|
Total
property and equipment, net
|
$329,255
|
$372,145
|
Depreciation
and amortization expense related to property and equipment totaled
approximately $169,000 and $165,000 during the fiscal years
ended December 28, 2018 and December 29, 2017,
respectively.
NOTE 3 – GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS
At
least annually, or whenever events or circumstances arise
indicating an impairment may exist, we review goodwill for
impairment. We are a single reporting unit consisting of purchased
on-demand labor branches, thus the analysis is conducted for the
Company as a whole. Our goodwill represents the consideration given
for acquisitions in excess of the fair value of identifiable assets
received. No provision has been made for an impairment loss as of
December 28, 2018 or December 29, 2017.
The
following table reflects our purchased goodwill and finite-lived
intangible assets.
|
December 28, 2018
|
December
29, 2017
|
||||
|
Gross
|
Accumulated
amortization
|
Net
|
Gross
|
Accumulated
amortization
|
Net
|
Goodwill
|
$3,777,568
|
$-
|
$3,777,568
|
$3,777,568
|
$-
|
$3,777,568
|
Finite-lived
intangible assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer
relationships
|
430,984
|
(277,652)
|
153,332
|
430,984
|
(170,597)
|
260,387
|
Non-compete
agreements
|
228,580
|
(228,580)
|
-
|
228,580
|
(180,959)
|
47,621
|
Total
finite-lived intangible assets
|
659,564
|
(506,232)
|
153,332
|
659,564
|
(351,556)
|
308,008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total goodwill
and intangible assets
|
$4,437,132
|
$(506,232)
|
$3,930,900
|
$4,437,132
|
$(351,556)
|
$4,085,576
|
Amortization
expense related to intangible assets totaled approximately $155,000
and $221,000 during the fiscal years ended December 28, 2018
and December 29, 2017, respectively.
The
following table reflects estimated future amortization expenses of
intangible assets with definite lives as of December 28,
2018:
Year
|
Obligation
|
2019
|
$107,746
|
2020
|
44,894
|
Thereafter
|
-
|
Total
|
$152,640
|
NOTE 4 – ACCOUNT PURCHASE AGREEMENT & LINE OF CREDIT
FACILITY
In May
2016, we signed an account purchase agreement with our lender,
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., which allows us to sell eligible accounts
receivable for 90% of the invoiced amount on a full recourse basis
up to the facility maximum, or $14.0 million on December 28, 2018
and December 29, 2017. When the receivable is paid by our
customers, the remaining 10% is paid to us, less applicable fees
and interest. Eligible accounts receivable are generally defined to
include accounts that are not more than ninety days past
due.
Pursuant
to this agreement, we owed approximately $399,000 and $854,000 at
December 28, 2018 and December 29, 2017, respectively. The current
agreement bears interest at the Daily One Month London Interbank
Offered Rate plus 2.50% per annum. At December 28, 2018 the
effective interest rate was 5.02%. Interest is payable on the
actual amount advanced. Additional charges include an annual
facility fee equal to 0.50% of the facility threshold in place and
lockbox fees. As collateral for repayment of any and all
obligations, we granted Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. a security interest
in our all of our property including, but not limited to, accounts
receivable, intangible assets, contract rights, deposit accounts,
and other such assets. The agreement requires that the sum of our
unrestricted cash plus net accounts receivable must at all times be
greater than the sum of the amount outstanding under the agreement
plus accrued payroll and accrued payroll taxes. At December 28,
2018 and December 29, 2017 we were in compliance with this
covenant.
As of
December 28, 2018, we have a letter of credit with Wells Fargo for
approximately $6.2 million that secures our obligations to our
workers’ compensation insurance carrier and reduces the
amount available to us under the account purchase agreement. For
additional information related to this letter of credit,
see Note 5 –
Workers’ Compensation Insurance and
Reserves.
NOTE 5 – WORKERS’ COMPENSATION INSURANCE AND
RESERVES
In
April 2014, we changed our workers’ compensation carrier to
ACE American Insurance Company, or ACE, in all states in which we
operate other than Washington and North Dakota. The ACE policy is a
large deductible policy where we have primary responsibility for
all claims made. ACE provides insurance for covered losses and
expenses in excess of $500,000 per incident. Under this large
deductible program, we are largely self-insured. Per our
contractual agreements with ACE, we must provide a collateral
deposit of $6.2 million, which is accomplished through a letter of
credit under our account purchase agreement with Wells Fargo. For
workers’ compensation claims originating in Washington and
North Dakota, we pay workers’ compensation insurance premiums
and obtain full coverage under mandatory state government
administered programs. Our liability associated with claims in
these jurisdictions is limited to the payment of premiums, which
are based upon the amount of payroll paid within the particular
state. Accordingly, our consolidated financial statements reflect
only the mandated workers’ compensation insurance premium
liability for workers’ compensation claims in these
jurisdictions.
From
April 2012 to March 2014, our workers’ compensation coverage
was obtained through Dallas National Insurance in all states in
which we operate, other than Washington and North Dakota. During
this time period, Dallas National changed its corporate name to
Freestone Insurance Company, or Freestone. The Freestone coverage
was a large deductible policy where we have primary responsibility
for claims under the policy. Freestone provided insurance for
covered losses and expenses in excess of $350,000 per incident. Per
our contractual agreements with Freestone, we made payments of $1.8
million as a non-depleting deposit as collateral for our
self-insured claims. See Note
9 – Commitments and Contingencies, for additional
information on cash collateral provided to Freestone and the
likelihood of its return to the company.
From
April 2011 to March 2012, our workers’ compensation coverage
was obtained through Zurich American Insurance Company, or Zurich,
in all states in which we operate, other than Washington and North
Dakota. The policy with Zurich was a guaranteed cost plan under
which all claims are paid by Zurich. Zurich provided workers’
compensation coverage in all states in which we operate other than
Washington and North Dakota.
Prior
to Zurich, our workers’ compensation coverage
was provided under an agreement with AMS Staff Leasing II, or AMS,
through its master workers’ compensation policy with
Freestone. The AMS
agreement provided coverage in all states in which we operate,
excluding Washington and North Dakota. The AMS coverage was a large
deductible policy where we have primary responsibility for claims
under the policy. Under the AMS agreement, we made payments into a
risk pool fund to cover claims within our self-insured layer. Per
our contractual agreements for this coverage, we were originally
required to maintain two deposits, one in the amount of $500,000
and one in the amount of $215,000. At December 28, 2018, our
deposits with AMS were approximately $483,000 and $192,000,
respectively, and at December 29, 2017, our deposits with AMS were
approximately $483,000 and $215,000, respectively.
Prior
to AMS, our workers’ compensation carrier was American
International Group, Inc., or AIG, in all states in which we
operate, other than Washington and North Dakota. The AIG coverage
was a large deductible policy where we have primary responsibility
for claims under the policy. Under the AIG policies, we made
payments into a risk pool fund to cover claims within our
self-insured layer. At December 29, 2017, our risk pool deposit
with AIG was approximately $100,000 and was fully refunded in May,
2018.
As part
of our large deductible workers’ compensation programs, our
carriers require that we collateralize a portion of our future
workers’ compensation obligations in order to secure future
payments made on our behalf. This collateral is typically in the
form of cash and cash equivalents. At December 28, 2018, we had net
cash collateral deposits of approximately $194,000. With the
addition of the $6.2 million letter of credit, our cash and
non-cash collateral totaled approximately $6.4 million at December
28, 2018.
Workers’
compensation expense for field team members is recorded as a
component of our cost of services and consists of the following
components: changes in our self-insurance reserves as determined by
our third party actuary, actual claims paid, insurance premiums and
administrative fees paid to our workers’ compensation
carrier(s), and premiums paid to mandatory state government
administered programs. Workers’ compensation expense for our
temporary workers totaled approximately $3.8 million and $3.7
million for the fiscal years ended December 28, 2018 and December
29, 2017, respectively.
The
following reflects the changes in our workers’ compensation
deposits and our workers’ compensation claims liability
during the fiscal years ended December 28, 2018 and December 29,
2017:
|
December 28, 2018
|
December 29, 2017
|
Workers’ Compensation Deposits
|
|
|
Workers’
compensation deposits available at the beginning of the
period
|
$301,187
|
$313,340
|
Deposits
refunded
|
(107,203)
|
-
|
Deposits
applied to payment of claims during the period
|
-
|
(12,153)
|
Deposits
available for future claims at the end of the period
|
$193,984
|
$301,187
|
|
|
|
Workers’ Compensation Claims Liability
|
|
|
Estimated
future claims liabilities at the beginning of the
period
|
$1,948,997
|
$2,706,701
|
Claims
paid during the period
|
(1,850,913)
|
(2,246,367)
|
Additional
future claims liabilities recorded during the period
|
1,784,014
|
1,488,663
|
Estimated
future claims liabilities at the end of the period
|
$1,882,098
|
$1,948,997
|
The
workers’ compensation risk pool deposits are classified as
current and non-current assets on the consolidated balance sheet
based upon management’s estimate of when the related claims
liabilities will be paid. The deposits have not been discounted to
present value in the accompanying consolidated financial
statements. All liabilities associated with our workers’
compensation claims are fully reserved on our consolidated balance
sheet.
NOTE 6 – STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Stock Repurchase: In September 2017, our Board of
Directors authorized a $5.0 million three-year repurchase plan of
our common stock. This plan replaces the previously announced plan,
which was put in place in April 2015. During 2018, we repurchased
approximately 324,000 shares of our common stock at an aggregate
price of approximately $1.8 million, resulting in an average price
of $5.65 per share. During 2017 we repurchased approximately 69,000
shares of our common stock at an aggregate price of approximately
$374,000, resulting in an average price of $5.45 per share. These
shares were then retired. As of December 28, 2018, we had
approximately $2.8 million remaining under the plan. We have no
obligation to repurchase our shares. The table below summarizes our
common stock purchased during 2018:
|
Total shares
purchased
|
Average price
per share
|
Total number of
shares purchased as part of publicly announced plan
|
Approximate
dollar value of shares that may be purchased under the
plan
|
December 30, 2017
to January 26, 2018
|
4,820
|
$5.75
|
585,892
|
$4,598,243
|
January 27, 2018 to
February 23, 2018
|
10,541
|
5.83
|
596,433
|
4,536,840
|
February 24, 2018
to March 30, 2018
|
7,100
|
5.62
|
603,533
|
4,496,949
|
March 31, 2018 to
April 27, 2018
|
34,310
|
5.67
|
637,843
|
4,302,379
|
April 28, 2018 to
May 25, 2018
|
26,382
|
5.77
|
664,225
|
4,150,262
|
May 26, 2018 to
June 29, 2018
|
42,900
|
5.66
|
707,125
|
3,907,442
|
June 30, 2018 to
July 27, 2018
|
36,275
|
6.03
|
743,400
|
3,688,744
|
July 28, 2018 to
August 24, 2018
|
57,400
|
5.69
|
800,800
|
3,361,906
|
August 25, 2018 to
September 28, 2018
|
69,993
|
5.77
|
870,793
|
2,958,257
|
September 29, 2018
to October 26, 2018
|
12,642
|
5.51
|
883,435
|
2,888,566
|
October 27, 2018 to
November 23, 2018
|
14,153
|
4.40
|
897,588
|
2,826,254
|
November 24, 2018
to December 28, 2018
|
7,258
|
4.05
|
904,846
|
2,796,828
|
Total
|
323,774
|
|
|
|
NOTE 7 – STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION
Stock Incentive Plan: Our 2008 Stock Incentive
Plan, which permitted the grant of up to 533,333 shares of our
common stock, expired in January 2016. Outstanding awards continue
to remain in effect according to the terms of the plan and the
award documents. On November 17, 2016, our stockholders approved
the Command Center, Inc. 2016 Stock Incentive Plan, under
which our Compensation Committee is authorized to issue awards for
up 500,000 shares over the 10-year life of the plan. Pursuant
to awards under these plans, there were approximately 76,000 and
191,000 options vested at December 28, 2018 and December 29, 2017,
respectively.
In July
2018, our Board of Directors authorized a restricted stock grant of
approximately 48,000 shares, valued at $300,000, to our six
non-employee directors. These shares vest in equal installments at
each grant date anniversary over the following two years.
During
2018, we granted 117,500 stock options to certain members of our
board and an officer of the Company. During 2017, we granted
approximately 75,000 stock options to certain officers and an
employee of the Company. The options were granted with an exercise
price equal to the fair market value on the date of grant, ten year
life and vesting over three years from the date of grant. The fair
value of each option award is estimated on the date of grant using
the Black-Scholes pricing model and expensed over the vesting
period. Expected volatility is based on historical annualized
volatility of our stock. The expected term of options granted
represents the period of time that options granted are expected to
be outstanding. The risk-free rate is based upon the U.S. Treasury
yield curve in effect at the time of grant. Currently we do not
foresee the payment of dividends in the near term. The assumptions
used to calculate the fair value are as follows:
|
2018
|
2017
|
Expected term
(years)
|
5.8
|
5.8
|
Expected
volatility
|
59.4% - 59.8%
|
61.5%
|
Dividend
yield
|
0.0%
|
0.0%
|
Risk-free
rate
|
2.1% - 2.4%
|
1.1%
|
The
following table summarizes our stock options outstanding at
December 30, 2016, and changes during the fiscal years ended
December 28, 2018 and December 29, 2017. The majority of the
expired options in 2018 were issued to our former CEO and
subsequently cancelled pursuant to the severance agreement with
him.
|
Number of shares under options
|
Weighted average exercise price per share
|
Weighted average grand date fair value
|
Outstanding,
December 30, 2016
|
208,166
|
$4.40
|
2.87
|
Granted
|
74,997
|
5.13
|
2.65
|
Forfeited
|
(834)
|
8.04
|
4.53
|
Expired
|
(27,334)
|
5.32
|
3.96
|
Outstanding,
December 29, 2017
|
254,995
|
4.49
|
6.48
|
Granted
|
117,500
|
5.67
|
3.15
|
Forfeited
|
(42,187)
|
5.61
|
2.96
|
Expired
|
(169,477)
|
3.74
|
2.47
|
Outstanding,
December 28, 2018
|
160,831
|
5.86
|
3.18
|
The
following table reflects a summary of our non-vested stock options
outstanding at December 30, 2016 and changes during the fiscal
years ended December 28, 2018 and December 29, 2017:
|
Number of
options
|
Weighted
average exercise price per share
|
Weighted
average grant date fair value
|
Non-vested,
December 30, 2016
|
53,126
|
$4.81
|
$2.98
|
Granted
|
74,997
|
4.49
|
5.68
|
Vested
|
(63,750)
|
5.47
|
2.86
|
Forfeited
|
(834)
|
8.04
|
4.53
|
Non-vested,
December 29, 2017
|
63,539
|
5.47
|
2.86
|
Granted
|
117,500
|
5.67
|
3.15
|
Vested
|
(54,329)
|
5.65
|
3.11
|
Forfeited
|
(42,187)
|
5.61
|
2.96
|
Non-vested,
December 28, 2018
|
84,523
|
5.56
|
3.05
|
The
following table summarizes information about our stock options
outstanding on, and reflects the intrinsic value recalculated based
on the closing price of our common stock of $3.77 at, December 28,
2018:
|
Number of
options
|
Weighted
average exercise price per share
|
Weighted
average remaining contractual life (years)
|
Aggregate
intrinsic value
|
Outstanding
|
160,831
|
$5.86
|
8.6
|
$318,652
|
Exercisable
|
76,308
|
6.18
|
7.8
|
-
|
The
following table summarized information about our stock options
outstanding, and reflects the weighted average contractual life at
December 28, 2018:
|
Outstanding
options
|
Vested
options
|
||
Range
of exercise prices
|
Number
of shares outstanding
|
Weighted
average contractual life
|
Number
of shares exercisable
|
Weighted
average contractual life
|
$4.80 - 7.00
Range
|
144,582
|
9.2
|
60,059
|
9.2
|
$7.01 - 8.76
Range
|
16,249
|
2.9
|
16,249
|
2.9
|
Share-based
compensation expense relating to the issuance of stock options
totaled approximately $332,000 and $157,000 during the fiscal years
ended December 28, 2018 and December 29, 2017, respectively.
Share-based
compensation expense relating to the issuance of stock grants
totaled approximately $62,000 during the fiscal year ended December
28, 2018. As of December 28, 2018, there was unrecognized
share-based compensation expense totaling approximately $425,000
relating to non-vested options and restricted stock grants that
will be recognized over the next 2.5 years.
NOTE 8 – INCOME TAX
On
December 22, 2017, the U.S. government enacted comprehensive tax
legislation commonly referred to as the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, or
the Tax Act. The Tax Act made broad and complex changes to the U.S.
tax code that affected our fiscal years ended December 29, 2017 and
December 28, 2018, including, but not limited to, (1) reducing the
U.S. federal corporate tax rate to 21%; (2) eliminating the
corporate alternative minimum tax, or AMT, and changing how
existing AMT credits can be realized; (3) creating the base erosion
anti-abuse tax, or BEAT, a new minimum tax; (4) creating a new
limitation on deductible interest expense; (5) changing rules
related to uses and limitations of net operating loss carryforwards
created in tax years beginning after December 31, 2017; (6) bonus
depreciation that will allow for full expensing of qualified
property; and (7) imposing limitations on the deductibility of
certain executive compensation. In connection with our initial
analysis of the impact of the Tax Act, we recorded an additional
tax expense of approximately $349,000 in the fourth quarter of
2017. This expense is primarily due to remeasurement of our net
deferred tax assets at the enacted rate of 21% compared to the
previous rate of 34%.
The
provision for deferred income taxes is comprised of the
following:
|
December 28,
2018
|
December 29,
2017
|
Current:
|
|
|
Federal
|
$473,964
|
$126,487
|
State
|
89,414
|
212,998
|
Deferred:
|
|
|
Federal
|
(211,514)
|
1,586,296
|
State
|
(146,792)
|
79,747
|
Provision for
income taxes
|
$205,072
|
$2,005,528
|
Deferred
income taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences
between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for
financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax
purposes. Significant components of our deferred taxes are as
follows:
|
December 28,
2018
|
December 29,
2017
|
Deferred
Tax Assets and Liabilities
|
|
|
Workers'
compensation claims liability
|
$469,040
|
$481,299
|
Depreciation/amortization
|
59,260
|
42,227
|
Bad debt
reserve
|
28,037
|
69,622
|
Deferred
Rent
|
17,610
|
21,235
|
Accrued
vacation
|
36,202
|
49,030
|
Impairment of
workers' comp deposit
|
383,786
|
-
|
Stock based
compensation
|
35,700
|
-
|
State net operating
loss carryforward
|
45,805
|
-
|
Other
|
4,468
|
-
|
AMT
Credit
|
-
|
58,189
|
Total deferred tax
asset
|
$1,079,908
|
$721,602
|
Management
estimates that our combined federal and state tax rates was
approximately 17.8% for 2018, net of federal benefit on state
income taxes. The items accounting for the difference between
income taxes computed at the statutory federal income tax rate and
the income taxes reported on the statements of income are as
follows:
|
December 28,
2018
|
December 29,
2017
|
||
Income tax expense
based on statutory rate
|
$247,665
|
21.0%
|
$1,252,858
|
34.0%
|
Permanent
differences
|
11,633
|
1.0%
|
46,939
|
1.3%
|
State income taxes
expense net of federal taxes
|
(45,329)
|
-3.8%
|
220,326
|
6.0%
|
Remeasurement of
net deferred tax asset at 21%
|
-
|
0.0%
|
349,240
|
9.5%
|
Stock based
compensation
|
-
|
0.0%
|
36,411
|
1.0%
|
Other
|
(8,897)
|
-0.8%
|
99,754
|
2.7%
|
Total taxes on
income
|
$205,072
|
17.4%
|
$2,005,528
|
54.5%
|
We have
analyzed our filing positions in all jurisdictions where we are
required to file income tax returns and found no positions that
would require a liability for unrecognized income tax benefits to
be recognized. We include interest and penalties as interest
expense on the consolidated financial statements.
NOTE 9 – COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Freestone Insurance Company Liquidation: From April 2012
through March 2014, our workers’ compensation insurance
coverage was provided by Dallas National Insurance, which changed
its corporate name to Freestone Insurance Company in 2013 (Dallas
National Insurance and Freestone Insurance Company are collectively
referred to as “Freestone”). Under the terms of these
insurance policies, we were required to provide cash collateral of
$900,000 per year, for a total of $1.8 million, as a non-depleting
fund to secure our payment up to the deductible amount on claims
occurring within the respective policy years.
From
July 2008 through March 2011, our workers’ compensation
coverage was provided under an agreement with AMS Staff Leasing II,
through its master workers’ compensation policy with
Freestone. During this time period, we deposited approximately
$500,000 with an affiliate of Freestone for collateral related to
the coverage provided to the company through AMS Staff Leasing II
and its policy with Freestone.
In
April 2014, the Insurance Commissioner of the State of Delaware
placed Freestone in receivership due to concerns about its
financial condition. In August 2014, the receivership was converted
to a liquidation proceeding. In late 2015, we filed timely proofs
of claim with the Receiver demonstrating our claimed right to
return of the company’s collateral deposits. One proof of
claim is filed as a priority claim seeking return of the full
amount of our collateral deposits. The other proof of claim is a
general claim covering non-collateral items. If it is ultimately
determined by the court that our claim is not a priority claim, or
if there are insufficient assets in the liquidation to satisfy the
priority claims, we may not receive any or all of our
collateral.
During
the second quarter of 2015 and the first quarter of 2016, after
evaluating information known at each point in time regarding the
Freestone receivership, it became apparent there was significant
uncertainty related to the collectability of the $500,000 deposit
previously placed under the AMS Staff Leasing II agreement related
to our insurance coverage from July 2008 through March 2011.
Because of this, we recorded a reserve of $250,000 in each of those
quarters, thereby fully reserving this deposit.
In late
May 2017, the Receiver filed a petition with the court, proposing a
plan as to how the Receiver would identify and pay collateral to
all insureds that paid cash collateral to Freestone. In the
petition, the Receiver acknowledged receiving only $500,000 of our
collateral. Of the $500,000 acknowledged, the Receiver proposed to
return only approximately $6,000 to us. In response to additional
information provided to and sought from the Receiver by us and by
others, the Receiver has withdrawn the initial petition,
acknowledging possible inaccuracies.
As part
of our review of first quarter 2018 financial results, the
company’s management and board of directors reviewed the
likelihood of collecting the remaining $1.8 million of collateral
paid to Freestone for policy years beginning in April of 2012 and
continuing through March of 2014. Based on court filings and other
available information, it was determined that it is more likely
than not that our priority claim will be treated in a similar
manner as other creditors, resulting in the priority claim having
little to no value. We believe that our recovery, if any, of the
deposits placed with Freestone and its affiliates will be the
greater of: (i) the amount determined and allowed resulting from a
tracing analysis of our collateral deposits; or (ii) the amount we
would receive in distribution as a general unsecured claimant based
on the amount of our collateral deposit.
Therefore,
we reasonably estimate the high end of the amount the company might
possibly recover through the receivership process is approximately
20% of the $1.8 million deposit amount. Accordingly, for the first
quarter of 2018, the reserve on this asset was reduced by
approximately $1.5 million, resulting in a net carrying amount of
$260,000. This amount is consistent with our current evaluation of
the Freestone receivership matter.
In July
2018, the Receiver filed with the Delaware Court of Chancery the
Second Accounting setting forth Freestone’s estimated assets
and liabilities for the period January 1, 2016, through December
31, 2016. The Second Accounting does not clarify the issues with
respect to collateral claims, priorities or return of collateral.
In the accounting, the Receiver reports total assets consisting of
cash and cash equivalents of $87.8 million as of December 31, 2016,
and estimated liabilities of $252,000,000.
Presently,
the Receiver has not put forth an amended or new petition regarding
its position as to precisely how cash collateral claimants should
be treated. Therefore, our stated reasonable estimate is the best
guidance we can offer as to the ultimate outcome of this matter. In
the event the company receives substantially less than our
reasonably estimated amount, there may be a material negative
effect on our financial statements.
Operating leases: We presently lease office
space for our corporate headquarters in Lakewood, Colorado. We own
all of the office furniture and equipment used in our corporate
headquarters. We also lease the facilities for all of our branch
locations. All of these facilities are leased at market rates that
vary in amount depending on location. Each branch is between 1,000
and 5,000 square feet, depending on location and market conditions.
Most of our branch leases have terms that extend over three to five
years. Some of the leases have cancellation provisions that allow
us to cancel with 90 days' notice. Other leases have been in
existence long enough that the term has expired and we are
currently occupying the premises on month-to-month tenancies. Below
are the minimum lease obligations as of December 28,
2018:
Year
|
Obligation
|
2019
|
$1,116,737
|
2020
|
778,512
|
2021
|
295,769
|
2022
|
106,265
|
2023
|
24,038
|
Thereafter
|
-
|
Total
|
$2,321,321
|
Lease
expense totaled approximately $1.5 million and $1.4 million for the
fiscal years ended December 28, 2018 and December 29, 2017,
respectively.
Legal Proceedings: From time to time we are involved in
various legal proceedings. We believe that the outcome of these
proceedings, even if determined adversely, will not have a material
adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of
operations. There have been no material changes in our legal
proceedings since December 28, 2018. Legal costs related to
contingencies are expensed as incurred.
NOTE 10 – SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
Hire Quest Merger
Agreement: On April 7, 2019, the Company, CCNI
One, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company (“Merger
Sub 1”), Command Florida, LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of
the Company (“Merger Sub 2”), and Hire Quest Holdings,
LLC (“Hire Quest”), entered into an Agreement and Plan
of Merger (the “Merger Agreement”), providing for the
acquisition of Hire Quest by the Company. The Merger Agreement
provides that, upon the terms and subject to the conditions set
forth in the Merger Agreement, (i) Merger Sub 1 will be merged with
and into Hire Quest (the “First Merger”), with Hire
Quest being the surviving entity (the “First Surviving
Company”), and (ii) immediately following the First Merger,
the First Surviving Company will be merged with and into Merger Sub
2 (the “Second Merger” and, together with the First
Merger, the “Merger”), with Merger Sub 2 being the
surviving entity (the “Surviving Company”). Upon
completion of the Merger and subject to shareholder approval, the
Company will change its name to HireQuest, Inc. In addition, the
Merger Agreement contemplates that the Company will commence a
self-tender offer to purchase up to 1,500,000 shares of its common
stock at share price of $6.00 per share (the
“Offer”).
Hire Quest is a trusted name in temporary staffing. Hire Quest
provides the back-office support team for Trojan Labor and Acrux
Staffing franchised branch locations across the United States.
Trojan Labor provides temporary staffing services which includes
general labor, industrial, and construction personnel. Acrux
Staffing provides temporary staffing services which includes
skilled, semi-skilled and general labor industrial personnel, as
well as clerical and secretarial personnel.
Subject to the terms and conditions of the Merger Agreement, which
has been approved by the Board of Directors of the Company and the
members of Hire Quest, if the Merger is completed, all of the
ownership interests in Hire Quest will be converted into the right
to receive an aggregate number of shares of the Company’s
common stock representing 68% of the shares of the Company’s
common stock outstanding immediately after the effective time of
the Merger but prior to giving effect to the purchase of the
Company’s common stock pursuant to the Offer. The
Merger Agreement requires Hire Quest’s net tangible assets at
closing to be at least $14 million.
The Company and Hire Quest have made customary representations,
warranties and covenants in the Merger Agreement. Subject to
certain exceptions, each of the Company and Hire Quest is required,
among other things, to conduct its business in the ordinary course
in all material respects during the interim period between the
execution of the Merger Agreement and the closing of the Merger.
The Company is required to seek shareholder approval of (i) the
amendment of the Company’s articles of incorporation to
increase the authorized shares of Company’s common stock and
to change the name of the Company to “HireQuest, Inc.”,
(ii) the issuance of shares of common stock pursuant to the Merger
Agreement and the related change of control of the Company pursuant
to Nasdaq listing rules, and (iii) the conversion of the Company
from a Washington corporation to a Delaware corporation. The
Company will call and hold a shareholders meeting seeking to obtain
such approvals. The
Company will distribute proxy statements to shareholders of record
containing additional details regarding the
Merger.
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH
ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
Effective
October 1, 2018, our independent registered public accounting firm
EKS&H LLLP, or EKS&H, combined with Plante Moran PLLC, or
Plante Moran. As a result of this transaction, on October 1, 2018,
EKS&H resigned as our independent registered public accounting
firm. Concurrent with their resignation, our audit committee
approved the engagement of Plante Moran as our new independent
registered public accounting firm.
EKS&H’s
report on our consolidated financial statements as of and for the
fiscal year ended December 29, 2017 did not contain any adverse
opinion or a disclaimer of opinion, nor was it qualified or
modified as to uncertainty, audit scope or accounting principles.
During our most recent fiscal year ended December 28, 2018, and
through October 1, 2018, we have not had any disagreement with
EKS&H on any matter of accounting principles or practices,
financial statement disclosure or auditing scope or procedures,
which disagreement, if not resolved to EKS&H’s
satisfaction, would have caused EKS&H to make reference to the
subject matter of the disagreement in their report on our
consolidated financial statements. In addition, during our most
recent fiscal year ended December 28, 2018, and through October 1,
2018, there were no “reportable events” as that term is
defined in Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K.
We have
not consulted Plante Moran on any matter relating to either (i) the
application of accounting principles to a specific transaction,
either completed or contemplated, or the type of audit opinion that
might be rendered on our financial statements or (ii) any matter
that was the subject of a disagreement (as that term is defined in
Item 304(a)(1)(iv) of Regulation S-K and the related instructions)
or a "reportable event" (as that term is defined in Item
304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K) for the fiscal year ended December
29, 2017.
We
provided EKS&H and Plante Moran each with a copy of this
disclosure prior to its filing with the Securities and Exchange
Commission, and requested that EKS&H and Plante Moran review
this disclosure for accuracy and completeness.
ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND
PROCEDURES
(a) Evaluation of disclosure
controls and procedures. Our Chief Executive Officer, or CEO, and our
Chief Financial Officer, or CFO, evaluated our disclosure controls
and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under
the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange
Act")), prior to the filing of this Form 10-K. Based on that
evaluation, our CEO and CFO concluded that, as of December 28,
2018, our disclosure controls and procedures were
effective.
(b) Management's report on
internal control over financial reporting. Our management, including our CEO and CFO,
is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal
control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f). Our management
conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal
control over financial reporting based on the framework
in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued
by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission. Based on our evaluation under the framework
in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013), our
management concluded that our internal control over financial
reporting was effective as of December 28,
2018.
(c) Changes in internal controls
over financial reporting. There were no changes in our internal
control over financial reporting during our most recently completed
fiscal quarter that materially affected, or are reasonably likely
to materially affect, our internal control over financial
reporting.
ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION
None.
PART III
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS,
AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
The
names and ages and positions of our directors and executive
officers are listed below along with their business experience
during the past five years. The business address of all executive
officers of the Company is 3609 S. Wadsworth Blvd., Suite 250,
Lakewood Colorado 80235. All of these individuals are citizens of
the United States. Our Board of Directors currently consists of
seven directors. Directors are elected at the annual meeting of
stockholders to serve until they resign or are removed, or are
otherwise disqualified to serve, or until their successors are
elected and qualified. Executive officers are appointed by the
Board. No family relationships exist among any of our directors or
executive officers.
Richard K. Coleman, Jr
|
Chief Executive Officer, President, and Director
|
Cory Smith
|
Chief Financial Officer
|
Brendan Simaytis
|
Executive Vice President, Secretary, and General
Counsel
|
JD Smith
|
Co-chairman of the Board
|
R. Rimmy Malhotra
|
Co-chairman of the Board
|
Steven Bathgate
|
Director
|
Steven P. Oman
|
Director
|
Galen Vetter
|
Director
|
Lawrence F. Hagenbuch
|
Director
|
Richard K. Coleman, Jr., age 62, was appointed as our
President, Chief Executive Officer, and a Director on April 1,
2018. Mr. Coleman has deep experience serving in senior executive
positions and on various public company boards, and has gained
extensive expertise in business development and operations. He is
also currently Chairman of Hudson Global Inc., a global talent
solutions company, and has been a director of Hudson since May
2014. Previously, Mr. Coleman served as Principal Executive Officer
of Crossroads Systems, Inc., a global provider of data archive
solutions, from August 2017 to March 2018, and as the
company’s President and CEO from May 2013 to July 2017. Mr.
Coleman has served in a variety of senior operational roles,
including CEO of Vroom Technologies, Inc., Chief Operating Officer
of MetroNet Communications, and President of US West Long Distance.
He also has held significant officer-level positions with Frontier
Communications, Centex Telemanagement, and Sprint Communications.
He formerly served as a director of: Ciber, Inc. from April 2014 to
December 2017, a leading global information technology company;
Crossroads Systems, Inc. from April 2013 to July 2017, a global
provider of data archive solutions; NTS, Inc. from December 2012 to
June 2014, a broadband services and telecommunications company;
Aetrium Incorporated from January 2013 to April 2014, a recognized
world leader in the global semiconductor industry; and On Track
Innovations Ltd. from December 2012 to April 2014, one of the
pioneers of cashless payment technology. Mr. Coleman has served as
an Adjunct Professor of Leadership and Management for Regis
University, and is a guest lecturer on leadership and ethics for
Denver University. Mr. Coleman has a Master of Business
Administration degree from Golden Gate University and is a graduate
of the United States Air Force Communications System Officer
School. He has a Bachelor of Science degree from the United States
Air Force Academy and has also completed leadership, technology,
and marketing programs at Kansas University, UCLA, and Harvard
Business School.
Cory Smith, age 43, was appointed as our Chief
Financial Officer on July 31, 2017. Mr. Smith was previously
employed by Command Center from 2010 through 2015, serving as our
Controller during the final two years of his tenure. Before
rejoining Command Center, he was employed by Southeast Staffing
beginning in 2015, where he served as the Vice President of
Finance. From 2005 to 2010, Mr. Smith worked as a Certified Public
Accountant, primarily performing attestation work. Mr. Smith
graduated cum laude from Lewis-Clark State College with a Bachelor
of Science in Business Administration.
Brendan Simaytis, age 45, was appointed Executive Vice
President and General Counsel on July 1, 2018, and also serves as
the Company’s Secretary. He has been employed with the
company since 2011, primarily as a corporate attorney.
Beginning in May of 2017, he served as Corporate Secretary and
Associate General Counsel. During the course of his
employment, Mr. Simaytis has become versed in all aspects of the
Company’s business and operations, and he has involvement and
oversight of various functions within the Company. Before
joining Command Center, he worked litigating personal injury,
property and contractual claims in Missouri and Illinois on behalf
of large and small corporate clients while at Williams Venker &
Sanders, LLC, a civil litigation law firm in St. Louis,
Missouri. He then worked in private practice in Coeur
d’Alene, Idaho, representing both businesses and individuals
in a variety of matters. Mr. Simaytis graduated with a
Bachelor of Arts from Northern Illinois University and a Juris
Doctor from Western Michigan University Cooley Law School. He
is admitted to practice in Missouri, Illinois and
Idaho.
JD Smith, age 48, has been a member of our Board of
Directors since December 10, 2012. Mr. Smith has worked in real
estate investment, construction and development since 1982.
Currently, Mr. Smith is the owner of Real Estate Investment
Consultants, LLC, a turnkey investment service firm serving all
sectors of real estate and investment and development businesses.
He also serves as chairman of the Board of Directors of iCore
Connect, Inc., a publicly-held New York-based company and provider
of comprehensive healthcare communications solutions. From 2008
until 2012 he was Director of Development for CP Financial, a
venture capital firm based in Scottsdale, Arizona. From 1993 until
2008 he developed over two dozen projects in the Phoenix Metro
Area, acting through his companies JD Investments, Inc., The High
Sonoran Group, Inc., and JD Smith Development, LLC. In 1990 he
formed his first operating company to buy and maintain residential
rental properties and obtained his real estate license. In 1993 he
graduated from Arizona State University with a Bachelor’s of
Science degree in Real Estate.
R. Rimmy Malhotra, age 43, was appointed to our Board of Directors on
April 6, 2016. From 2013 to the present, Mr. Malhotra has served as
the Managing Member and Portfolio Manager for the Nicoya Fund LP, a
private investment partnership. Previously, from 2008 to 2013 he
served as portfolio manager of the Gratio Values Fund, a mutual
fund registered under the Investment Act of 1940. Prior to this, he
was an Investment Analyst at a New York based hedge fund. He earned
an MBA in Finance from The Wharton School and a Master’s
degree in International Relations from the University of
Pennsylvania where he was a Lauder Fellow. Mr. Malhotra holds
undergraduate degrees in Computer Science and Economics from Johns
Hopkins University.
Steven Bathgate, age 64,
has over 35 years of security industry experience, particularly
with microcap companies. He was appointed to our Board of Directors
in 2016. In 1995 he founded GVC Capital LLC and he is the Senior
Managing Partner of that firm. GVC Capital is an investment banking
firm located in Denver, Colorado, focusing primarily on providing
comprehensive investment banking services to undervalued microcap
companies. Prior to founding GVC Capital, Mr. Bathgate was CEO of
securities firm Cohig & Associates in Denver from 1985 to 1995
and was previously Managing Partner, Equity Trading, at Wall Street
West. He was previously a director for Global Healthcare REIT and
Bluebook International, Inc. Mr. Bathgate received a Bachelor of
Science in Finance from the University of Colorado, Leeds School of
Business.
Steven P. Oman, age 70, has been a member of our Board of
Directors since March 16, 2018. Mr. Oman is currently a partner in
the law firm Provident Law, PLLC, located in Scottsdale, Arizona,
and has held this position since June of 2015. Mr. Oman has been a
practicing attorney for over 43 years, primarily in areas of
business, real estate and estate planning. Prior to his work at
Provident Law, he was a sole practitioner for many years in
Scottsdale, Arizona, for the Law Office of Steven P. Oman. Mr. Oman
has also served as a director and officer of other publicly-held
companies, including Alanco Technologies, Inc., and Photocomm,
Inc., providing various services and products over the years,
including satellite-based technology, photovoltaics and oil
industry water disposal facilities. Mr. Oman received his Bachelor
of Mechanical Engineering degree in 1970 from the University of
Minnesota, Institute of Technology, and his J.D. from William
Mitchell College of Law, St. Paul, Minnesota in 1975. Mr. Oman is a
member of the State Bar of Arizona and the Maricopa County Bar
Association.
Galen Vetter, age 67, was appointed to our Board of
Directors in April 2018. He brings significant senior executive
management and board experience to Command Center, along with
accounting and financial expertise. Mr. Vetter served as president
of Rust Consulting, Inc. from December 2008 to May 2012, as global
chief financial officer of Franklin Templeton Investment Funds from
April 2004 to November 2008 and in numerous roles at RSM LLP from
June 1973 to March 2004. Since January 2009 Mr. Vetter has served
as a member on the Advisory Board of Directors of Land
O’Lakes, Inc. Since 2013 he has served as a director of
Alerus Financial, Inc. Mr. Vetter is a licensed certified
public accountant (inactive). He received his Bachelor of
Science degree from the University of Northern Iowa. Mr.
Vetter has had extensive exposure to the analysis of financial
statements and financial reporting matters and qualifies as an
“audit committee financial expert” under SEC
guidelines.
Lawrence F. Hagenbuch, age 52, was appointed to our Board of Directors in
April 2018. He brings extensive operations and board experience to
Command Center, along with expertise in the creation of innovative
marketing and planning strategies. Mr. Hagenbuch is currently a
Managing Director with Huron Consulting. Mr. Hagenbuch served on
the board of directors and the audit and compensation committees of
the publicly traded firm Remy International from 2008 until the
sale of the company in 2015. He currently serves on the board of
directors of the publicly traded company Arotech. Mr. Hagenbuch has
served in senior management positions at J. Hilburn, Alix Partners,
GE / GE capital, and American National Can. Mr. Hagenbuch began his
professional career in the United States Navy. Mr. Hagenbuch earned
an undergraduate degree in engineering from Vanderbilt University
on a full Navy ROTC scholarship. He later earned an MBA from the
Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania. Mr. Hagenbuch
currently serves as a founding board member of the veteran’s
service charity, Soldiers Who Salsa.
Corporate Governance Policies and Code of Ethics
We have
adopted a Standard of Ethics and Business Conduct, Corporate
Governance Guidelines, and a Policy on Roles and Responsibilities
of the Chairman of the Board. Those policies are available on our
website at www.commandonline.com and in print
to any stockholder upon request at no charge. Requests should be
addressed to: Secretary, Command Center, Inc., 3609 S. Wadsworth
Blvd., Suite 250, Lakewood, CO 80235.
The
Standards of Ethics and Business Conduct is applicable to all
directors, officers and employees of Command Center. To date,
there have been no waivers under our Standards of Ethics and
Business Conduct. We intend to disclose future amendments to, or
waivers from, our Standards of Ethics and Business Conduct on our
website within four business days following the date of such
amendment or waiver.
Committees of the Board of Directors
Our
Board of Directors established three standing committees and a
special committee to facilitate and assist the Board in the
execution of its responsibilities. The committees are the Audit
Committee, the Compensation Committee, the Nominating and
Governance Committee, and the Strategic Alternatives Committee. The
composition and function of each of our committees complies with
the rules of the SEC that are currently applicable to us and we
intend to comply with additional exchange listing requirements to
the extent that they become applicable to us in the future. The
Board has also adopted charters for the Audit Committee,
Compensation Committee and Nominating and Governance Committee.
Charters for these committees are available on our website
at www.commandonline.com. The charter of each committee is
also available in print to any stockholder upon request at no
charge. The table below shows current membership for each of the
standing Board committees and the special Board
committee.
Audit Committee
|
|
Compensation Committee
|
|
Nominating and Governance Committee
|
|
Strategic Alternatives Committee
|
Galen Vetter (Chair)
|
|
Lawrence F. Hagenbuch (Chair)
|
|
JD Smith (Chair)
|
|
R. Rimmy Malhotra (Chair)
|
Lawrence F. Hagenbuch
|
|
R. Rimmy Malhotra
|
|
Steven P. Oman
|
|
Steven Bathgate
|
Steven P. Oman
|
|
Steven Bathgate
|
|
Galen Vetter
|
|
JD Smith
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lawrence F. Hagenbuch
|
Audit Committee: Galen Vetter (Chairman),
Lawrence F. Hagenbuch, and Steven P. Oman currently serve on the
Audit Committee. The Audit Committee met on four occasions in 2018
and reviewed our quarterly filings and our annual filing and audit.
Additional discussions among committee members outside of meetings
were held to discuss the audit process and the preparation and
review the consolidated financial statements.
Our
Board of Directors has determined that Galen Vetter qualifies as an
“audit committee financial expert” as defined under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the applicable rules of the
NASDAQ Capital Market. All the members of the Audit Committee are
financially literate pursuant to the NASDAQ Listing Rules. Each of
the members of the Audit Committee met and meets the independence
standards for independent directors under the NASDAQ Listing
Rules.
The Audit Committee’s responsibilities
include:
a)
appointing,
determining funding for, evaluating, and replacing of, and
assessing the independence of our independent registered public
accounting firm;
b)
reviewing
and discussing with management and the independent registered
public accounting firm our annual and quarterly financial
statements and related disclosures;
c)
pre-approving
auditing and permissible non-audit services, and the terms of such
services, to be provided by our independent registered public
accounting firm;
d)
coordinating
the oversight and reviewing the adequacy of our internal controls
over financial reporting;
e)
establishing
policies and procedures for the receipt and retention of accounting
related complaints and concerns;
f)
preparing
the audit committee report required by Securities and Exchange
Commission rules to be included in our annual proxy statement;
and
g)
monitoring
compliance with our Code of Ethics
Compensation Committee: Lawrence F. Hagenbuch
(Chairman), R. Rimmy Malhotra, and Steven Bathgate currently serve
on the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee met on
six occasions in 2018. The Compensation Committee is comprised of
three non-employee directors. Each of the members of the
Compensation Committee met and meets the independence standards for
independent directors under the NASDAQ Listing Rules.
The Compensation Committee oversees our executive compensation
program, establishes our compensation philosophy and policies, and
administers our compensation plans. The Compensation
Committee generally reviews the compensation programs applicable to
executive officers on an annual basis. In setting
compensation levels for a particular executive, the Committee takes
into consideration the proposed compensation package as a whole and
each element individually, as well as the executive's past and
expected future contributions to our business.
The Committee has the authority to engage its own independent
advisors to assist in carrying out its
responsibilities. No such advisors are currently
engaged. The Compensation
Committee did not use an advisor to assist it in determining
executive compensation for our 2018 fiscal
year. Executive management of the Company is
actively involved in determining appropriate compensation and
making recommendations to the Compensation Committee for its
consideration.
Nominating and Governance Committee: JD Smith
(Chairman), Steven P. Oman, and Galen Vetter currently serve
on the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. The
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee met on three
occasions in 2018. Each of the members of the Nominating and
Governance Committee met and meets the independence standards for
independent directors under the NASDAQ Listing Rules.
The
Nominating and Governance Committee Charter grants such Committee
the authority to determine the skills and qualifications required
of directors and to develop criteria to be considered in selecting
potential candidates for Board membership. Neither the Committee
nor the Board has established any minimum qualifications for
nominees, but the Board does consider the composition of the Board
as a whole, the requisite characteristics (including independence,
diversity, experience in industry, finance, administration and
operations) of each candidate, and the skills and expertise of its
current members, while taking into account the overall operating
efficiency of the Board and its committees.
The Nominating and Governance Committee’s responsibilities
include, but are not limited to:
a)
developing
and recommending to the Board criteria for Board and committee
membership;
b)
establishing
procedures for identifying and evaluating director candidates
including nominees recommended by stockholders;
c)
identifying
individuals qualified to become Board members;
d)
recommending
to the Board the persons to be nominated for election as directors
and to each of the Board’s committees; and
e)
overseeing
the evaluation of the effectiveness of the organization of the
Board, including its committees, and the Board’s
performance.
Special Committee: In February 2017, our Board
established the Strategic Alternatives Committee as a special
committee. R. Rimmy Malhotra (Chairman), Steven Bathgate, JD Smith,
and Lawrence F. Hagenbuch currently serve on the Committee. The
Committee is empowered to identify and evaluate strategic
opportunities available to the Company. The Committee has engaged
the services of an investment banking firm to assist the Committee
in fulfilling this assignment. Each of the members of the Strategic
Alternatives Committee met and meets the independence standards for
independent directors under the NASDAQ Listing Rules.
Director Nominations
The
Board of Directors nominates directors for election at each annual
meeting of stockholders and appoints new directors to fill
vacancies when they arise. The Nominating and Governance Committee
has the responsibility to identify, evaluate, recruit and recommend
qualified candidates to the Board of Directors for nomination or
election.
One of
the Board of Directors’ objectives in evaluating director
nominations is to ensure that its membership is composed of
experienced and dedicated individuals with a diversity of
backgrounds, perspectives and skills. The Nominating and Governance
Committee will select nominees for director based on their
character, judgment, diversity of experience, business acumen, and
ability to act on behalf of all stockholders. We do not have a
formal diversity policy, however, the Nominating and Governance
Committee endeavors to have a Board representing diverse viewpoints
as well as diverse expertise at policy-making levels in many areas,
including business, accounting and finance, marketing and sales,
legal, government affairs, regulatory affairs, business
development, technology and in other areas that are relevant to our
activities.
The
Nominating and Governance Committee believes that nominees for
director should have experience, such as those mentioned above,
that may be useful to the Company and the Board of Directors, high
personal and professional ethics and the willingness and ability to
devote sufficient time to carry out effectively their duties as
directors. The Nominating and Governance Committee believes it is
appropriate for at least one, and, preferably, multiple, members of
the Board of Directors to meet the criteria for an “audit
committee financial expert” as defined by rules of the SEC,
and for a majority of the members of the Board of Directors to meet
the definition of “independent director” as defined by
the NASDAQ Listing Rules. The Nominating and Governance Committee
also believes it is appropriate for key members of our management
to participate as members of the Board of Directors. Prior to each
annual meeting of stockholders, the Nominating and Governance
Committee identifies nominees first by evaluating the current
directors whose term will expire at the annual meeting and who are
willing to continue in service. These candidates are evaluated
based on the criteria described above, including as demonstrated by
the candidate’s prior service as a director, and the needs of
the Board of Directors with respect to the particular talents and
experience of its directors. In the event that a director does not
wish to continue in service, the Nominating and Governance
Committee determines not to re-nominate the director, a vacancy is
created on the Board of Directors as a result of a resignation, an
increase in the size of the Board or other event, the Committee
will consider various candidates for Board membership, including
those suggested by the Committee members, by other Board members,
by any executive search firm engaged by the Committee or by
stockholders.
On
September 5, 2017, our Board of Directors approved and adopted an
amendment, effective as of such date, to our amended and restated
bylaws. The amendment added Article 3.8, which is an advance notice
provision for director nominations and stockholder proposals. A
stockholder who wishes to suggest a prospective nominee for the
Board of Directors should notify Command Center’s Secretary
in writing and include any supporting material the stockholder
considers appropriate. Information to be in the notice includes (i)
the name, age, business address and residence address for the
nominee, (ii) the principal occupation or employment of each such
nominee, (iii) the number of shares of capital stock of the
corporation which are owned of record and beneficially by each such
nominee (if any), (iv), such other information concerning each such
nominee as would be required to be disclosed in a proxy statement
soliciting proxies for the election of such nominee as a director
in an election contest (even if an election contest is not
involved) or that is otherwise required to be disclosed, under
Section 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder, (v) the
consent of the nominee to being named in the proxy statement as a
nominee and to serve as a director if elected, and (vi) as to the
Proposing Stockholder: (A) the name and address of the Proposing
Stockholder as they appear on the corporation’s books and of
the beneficial owner, if any, on whose behalf the nomination is
being made, (B) the class and number of shares of the corporation
which are owned by the Proposing Stockholder (beneficially and of
record) and owned by the beneficial owner, if any, on whose behalf
the nomination is being made, as of the date of the Proposing
Stockholder’s notice, and a representation that the Proposing
Stockholder will notify the Corporation in writing of the class and
number of such shares owned of record and beneficially as of the
record date for the meeting promptly following the later of the
record date or the date notice of the record date is first publicly
disclosed, (C) a description of any agreement, arrangement or
understanding with respect to such nomination between or among the
Proposing Stockholder and any of its affiliates or associates, and
any others (including their names) acting in concert with any of
the foregoing, and a representation that the Proposing Stockholder
will notify the corporation in writing of any such agreement,
arrangement or understanding in effect as of the record date for
the meeting promptly following the later of the record date or the
date notice of the record date is first publicly disclosed, (D) a
description of any agreement, arrangement or understanding
(including any derivative or short positions, profit interests,
options, hedging transactions, and borrowed or loaned shares) that
has been entered into as of the date of the Proposing
Stockholder’s notice by, or on behalf of, the Proposing
Stockholder or any of its affiliates or associates, the effect or
intent of which is to mitigate loss to, manage risk or benefit of
share price changes for, or increase or decrease the voting power
of the Proposing Stockholder or any of its affiliates or associates
with respect to shares of stock of the corporation, and a
representation that the Proposing Stockholder will notify the
Corporation in writing of any such agreement, arrangement or
understanding in effect as of the record date for the meeting
promptly following the later of the record date or the date notice
of the record date is first publicly disclosed, (E) a
representation that the Proposing Stockholder is a holder of record
of shares of the corporation entitled to vote at the meeting and
intends to appear in person or by proxy at the meeting to nominate
the person or persons specified in the notice, and (F) a
representation whether the Proposing Stockholder intends to deliver
a proxy statement and/or form of proxy to holders of at least the
percentage of the corporation’s outstanding capital stock
required to approve the nomination and/or otherwise to solicit
proxies from stockholders in support of the nomination. Submission
of a prospective nominee must comply with the requirements set
forth in the Company's Bylaws.
Stockholder
nominations must be made in accordance with the procedures outlined
in, and must include the information required by, our Bylaws and
must be addressed to: Secretary, Command Center, Inc., 3609 S.
Wadsworth Blvd., Suite 250, Lakewood, CO 80235. Stockholders can
obtain a copy of our Bylaws by writing to the Secretary at this
address.
Stockholder Communications with the Board of Directors
If a
stockholder wishes to communicate with the Board of Directors, he
or she may send any communication in writing to: Secretary, Command
Center, Inc., 3609 S. Wadsworth Blvd., Suite 250, Lakewood, CO
80235. The stockholder should include his or her name and address
in the written communication and indicate whether he or she is a
stockholder of Command Center. The Secretary will review any
communication received from a stockholder, and all material
communications from stockholders will be forwarded to the
appropriate director or directors or Committee of the Board of
Directors based on the subject matter.
Director
Compensation
The
following table summarizes the cash, equity awards, and all other
compensation earned by each of our non-employee directors during
the fiscal year ended December 28, 2018. Directors who are also
officers are included in the Summary Executive Compensation Table
below.
Name
|
Fees earned or paid in cash
|
Share awards (1)
|
Option awards (2)
|
Total
|
JD
Smith
|
$39,445
|
$64,225
|
$-
|
$103,670
|
R. Rimmy
Malhotra
|
38,720
|
64,225
|
26,730
|
129,675
|
Steven
Bathgate
|
32,316
|
64,225
|
26,730
|
123,271
|
Steven P.
Oman
|
23,683
|
52,373
|
-
|
76,055
|
Galen
Vetter
|
24,672
|
51,582
|
-
|
76,254
|
Lawrence F.
Hagenbuch
|
21,504
|
51,582
|
-
|
73,086
|
John Schneller
(3)
|
17,321
|
14,225
|
-
|
31,546
|
Richard Finlay
(4)
|
11,364
|
-
|
-
|
11,364
|
John Stewart
(5)
|
11,537
|
-
|
-
|
11,537
|
Total
|
$220,562
|
$362,436
|
$53,460
|
$636,459
|
1)
This column
represents the grant date fair value of shares awarded to each
non-employee director in 2018 in accordance with U.S. GAAP. The
amounts were calculated using the closing price of our stock on the
grant date.
2)
This column
represents the grant date fair value of options awarded to each
non-employee director in 2018 in accordance with U.S.
GAAP.
3)
Served as director
until July 12, 2018.
4)
Served as director
until January 22, 2018.
5)
Served as director
and Chairman of the Board until January 16, 2018.
Narrative to Director Compensation Table
The
Compensation Committee recommends and the Board of Directors
determines the compensation for our directors, based on industry
standards and our financial situation. During 2018, we paid each of
our independent directors a base amount of $25,000 as an annual
retainer, paid on a quarterly basis, and granted each independent
director 8,026 restricted shares of our common stock which vest in
equal installments at each grant date anniversary over the next two
years. In addition, each Co-Chairman of the Board receives an
additional $5,000 annual retainer, the Chairman of the Audit
Committee receives an additional $6,500 annual retainer, and each
Chairman of the Compensation Committee and the Nominating and
Governance Committee receives an additional $5,000 annual retainer.
Non-chairman members of the Audit committee receive an additional
$3,500 annual retainer, and non-chairman members of all other
committees receive an additional $2,500 annual
retainer.
Attendance at Meetings
During
2018, our Board of Directors held fifteen meetings and acted by
unanimous written consent on seven occasions. During 2017, our
Board of Directors held twelve meetings and acted by unanimous
written consent on four occasions. Each member attended at least
75% of the meetings of the Board and committees on which he or she
served during his or her term of office. Directors are expected to
attend the Company’s meetings of stockholders, absent unusual
circumstances. Last year’s annual meeting of stockholders was
attended by all of our directors.
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting
Compliance
Section
16(a) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
requires our officers, directors, and beneficial owners of more
than 10% any of our equity securities to timely file certain
reports regarding ownership of and transactions in our securities
with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Copies of the required
filings must also be furnished to us. We became subject to the
requirements of Section 16(a) on February 8, 2008. Section 16(a)
compliance was required during the fiscal year ended December 28,
2018. Based solely on a review of Forms 3, 4 and 5 and
amendments thereto furnished to us pursuant to Rule 16a-3(e)
under the Exchange Act during 2018, we believe that, during 2018,
the filing requirements under Section 16(a) of the Exchange
Act were satisfied.
Indebtedness of Management
No
director or executive officer or nominee for director, or any
member of the immediate family of such has been indebted to the
Company during the past year.
Officer and Director Legal Proceedings
There
are no legal proceedings involving our officers or
directors.
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE
COMPENSATION
Role of Executive Officers in Executive Compensation
The
Compensation Committee is charged with reviewing executive
compensation and making recommendations to the Board of Directors
based upon their review and analysis. None of our executive
officers currently serve as a member of the compensation committee
of any entity that has one or more executive officers serving as an
independent director on our Board of Directors or Compensation
Committee.
Summary Compensation Table
The
following tables provide a summary of information about
compensation expensed or accrued by us during the fiscal years
ended December 28, 2018, and December 29, 2017 for (a) our Chief
Executive Officer, (b) our former Chief Executive Officer, (c)
our Chief Financial Officer, (d) our Executive Vice President and
General Counsel, and (e) our former Executive Vice President and
General Counsel; collectively, the Named Executive Officers or
NEOs. Columns required by SEC rules are omitted where there is no
amount to report.
Name and Principal Position
|
|
Year
|
Salary
|
Bonus
|
Option awards (6)
|
All other compensation
|
Total
|
Richard K. Coleman, Jr. (1)
|
|
2018
|
$243,750
|
$100,000
|
$316,335
|
297(7)
|
$660,382
|
President,
Chief Executive Officer, and Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cory Smith (2)
|
|
2018
|
172,500
|
23,763
|
-
|
27,728(8)
|
223,991
|
Chief
Financial Officer
|
|
2017
|
63,462
|
-
|
12,450
|
-
|
75,912
|
Brendan Simaytis (3)
|
|
2018
|
196,250
|
35,644
|
-
|
90(7)
|
231,984
|
Executive
Vice President and General Counsel
|
|
2017
|
176,077
|
40,000
|
62,941
|
-
|
279,018
|
Frederick Sandford (4)
|
|
2018
|
68,750
|
-
|
-
|
697,664(9)
|
766,414
|
Former
Chief Executive Officer and Director
|
|
2017
|
275,000
|
-
|
62,251
|
-
|
337,251
|
Ronald Junck (5)
|
|
2018
|
171,363
|
59,407
|
-
|
20,155(10)
|
250,925
|
Former
Executive Vice President and General Counsel
|
|
2017
|
206,538
|
-
|
75,391
|
-
|
281,929
|
1)
Mr. Coleman was
appointed Chief Executive Officer on April 1, 2018.
2)
Mr. Smith was
appointed Chief Financial Officer on July 22, 2017.
3)
Mr. Simaytis was
appointed Executive Vice President and General Counsel on July 1,
2018.
4)
Mr.
Sandford’s tenure as an officer ended on March 31,
2018.
5)
Mr. Junck’s
tenure as an officer ended on May 25, 2018.
6)
Refer to Note 7
– Stock-based Compensation in the Notes to the Consolidated
Financial Statements for assumptions used to determine option
value.
7)
Other compensation
is for Company sponsored life insurance.
8)
Mr. Smith’s
other compensation is for reimbursable relocation expenses and
Company sponsored life insurance.
9)
Mr.
Sandford’s other compensation is for severance and Company
sponsored life insurance.
10)
Mr. Junck's other
compensation is for consulting fees and Company sponsored life
insurance.
Narrative to Summary Compensation Table
Summary of Executive Employment
Agreements: On March
31, 2019 we entered into an Executive Employment Agreement with
Richard K. Coleman, Jr., the Company's Chief Executive Officer,
effective as of April 1, 2019. This agreement provides for Mr.
Coleman to continue serving as our Chief Executive Officer during
an initial six month term and to receive an annual base salary of
$325,000. Mr. Coleman will be eligible for a performance bonus
during the initial term, and a lump sum payment equal to $200,000
at the closing of a change of control transaction, under certain
conditions.
On June 29, 2018, we entered into an Executive Employment Agreement
with Cory Smith, the Company’s Chief Financial Officer,
effective as of July 1, 2018. This agreement provides for Mr. Smith
to continue serving as the Company’s Chief Financial Officer
during an initial one-year term and to receive an annual base
salary of $180,000. Mr. Smith will also be eligible for an
performance bonus during the initial
term, and a lump sum payment of $50,000 in the event of a change of
control, as defined by the agreement, during the term or within six
months following the term. If Mr. Smith’s employment is
terminated by us without cause within 12 months following a change
of control, Mr. Smith will be entitled to receive his base salary
for the greater of six months or the time remaining in the current
term of the agreement.
On June 29, 2018, we entered into an Executive Employment Agreement
with Brendan Simaytis, the Company’s Executive Vice President
and General Counsel, effective as of July 1, 2018. This agreement
provides for Mr. Simaytis to continue serving as the
Company’s Executive Vice President and General Counsel during
an initial one-year term and to receive an annual base salary of
$200,000. Mr. Simaytis will also be eligible for an performance bonus during the initial
term, and a lump sum payment of $50,000 in the event of a change of
control, as defined by the agreement, during the term or within six
months following the term. If Mr. Simaytis’s employment
is terminated by us without cause within 12 months following a
change of control, Mr. Simaytis will be entitled to receive his
base salary for the greater of six months or the time remaining in
the current term of the agreement.
On March 28, 2018, we entered into a severance agreement with our
former Chief Executive Officer Frederick Sandford. Pursuant to this
severance agreement, we mutually agreed to terminate Mr.
Sandford’s employment as of March 31, 2018, 11:59 p.m. In
addition, Mr. Sandford agreed to resign as a member of our Board of
Directors and from all other positions with Command Center, also
effective at 11:59 p.m. on March 31, 2018. In return, we agreed to
pay Mr. Sandford $275,000 severance, an amount equal to 105% of the
value of Mr. Sandford’s unexercised options whether vested or
not, and $25,000 to cover his legal fees. All unexercised options
were terminated and cancelled as a result.
On May 25, 2018, we entered into a severance agreement and a
consulting agreement with our former Vice President
and General counsel Ronald L. Junck. Pursuant to the severance
agreement, we will pay Mr. Junck severance in the amount of $75,000
over the course of four months in regular installments, pay all
accrued but unused vacation time, and his participation in the
Company’s health insurance plans will continue through May
31, 2018. Pursuant to the consulting agreement, Mr. Junck will
provide consulting services to the Company commencing June 1, 2018,
and continuing through July 31, 2018, for a $10,000 monthly
fee.
All our
executive officers receive expense reimbursement for business
travel and participation in employee benefits programs made
available during the term of employment.
Summary of the Executive Bonus Program
The 2018 plan was established by our Compensation Committee, in
conjunction with our Board of Directors and input from management,
through our current executive employments agreements. The plan sets
out a goal and incentives for management upon achievement of which
management will be awarded cash. This goal represents our business
focus for the 2018 fiscal year and strives to align our business
focus with the interests of our stockholders.
The plan provides for a bonus pool to be created in an amount equal
to 15% of our 2018 adjusted EBITDA exceeding $3 million. This pool
will be distributed to members of our executive management, with
50% of the pool going to our Chief Executive Officer, Richard K.
Coleman, Jr., 25% going to our Chief Financial Officer, Cory Smith,
and 25% going to our Executive Vice President and General Counsel,
Brendan Simaytis.
Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End
The
following table shows grants of options outstanding on December 28,
2018, the last day of our last completed fiscal year, to each of
the NEOs named in the Summary Compensation Table.
Name
|
|
Grant
date
|
Number of
securities underlying unexercised options
exercisable
|
Number of
securities underlying unexercised options
unexercisable
|
Option
exercise price
|
Option expiration date
|
Richard K. Coleman,
Jr.
|
|
4/1/2018
|
42,143
|
57,857
|
$5.70
(1) |
3/31/2028
|
Cory
Smith
|
|
9/29/2017
|
2,083
|
2,083
|
5.40
(2) |
9/28/2027
|
Brendan
Simaytis
|
|
9/22/2017
|
8,333
|
8,333
|
4.80
(2) |
9/21/2027
|
|
|
9/29/2017
|
3,125
|
3,125
|
5.40
(2) |
9/28/2027
|
1)
These options vest
25% at the date of grant with the remaining 75% vesting in equal,
monthly increments of the first day of each of the following 35
months.
2)
These options vest
in four equal installments, 25% at the date of grant, and 25% at
each grant date anniversary over the following three
years.
Payments upon Termination and Change in Control
The
following is a summary setting forth potential severance payments
and benefits provided for our current NEOs valued as of December
28, 2018.
Richard
K. Coleman, Jr., President and Chief Executive
Officer
|
Involuntary Termination without Cause
(1)
|
Termination for Change in
Control
|
Death
|
Disability
|
Base
Salary
|
$231,250
|
$-
|
$-
|
$-
|
Bonus (2)
|
80,539
|
200,000
|
-
|
-
|
Total
|
$311,789
|
$200,000
|
$-
|
$-
|
1)
Includes base salary through the end of the current
term.
2)
Includes
2018 performance bonus and change in control bonus. The change in
control bonus is an amount equal to $200,000 reduced by any payment
made pursuant to the 2018 performance
bonus.
Cory Smith, Chief Financial Officer
|
Involuntary Termination without Cause
(1)
|
Termination for Change in Control
(1)
|
Death (1)
|
Disability (1)
|
Base
Salary
|
$90,000
|
$90,000
|
$90,000
|
$90,000
|
Bonus (2)
|
40,270
|
90,270
|
-
|
-
|
Total
|
$130,270
|
$180,270
|
$90,000
|
$90,000
|
1)
Includes base salary
through the end of the current term, or 6
months.
2)
Includes 2018 performance bonus and change in control
bonus.
Brendan Simaytis, Executive Vice President and General
Counsel
|
Involuntary Termination without Cause
(1)
|
Termination for Change in Control
(1)
|
Death (1)
|
Disability (1)
|
Base
Salary
|
$100,000
|
$100,000
|
$100,000
|
$100,000
|
Bonus (2)
|
40,270
|
90,270
|
-
|
-
|
Total
|
$140,270
|
$190,270
|
$100,000
|
$100,000
|
1)
Includes base salary
through the end of the current term, or 6
months.
2)
Includes 2018 performance bonus and change in control
bonus.
Payments Made Upon Any Termination: Regardless of the
manner in which an NEOs employment terminates, the executive is
entitled to receive amounts earned during his term of employment.
Such amounts include: earned but unpaid salary through the date of
termination; non-equity incentive compensation earned and payable
prior to the date of termination; option grants received which have
already vested and are exercisable prior to the date of termination
(subject to the terms of the applicable option agreements) and
unused vacation pay.
Payments Made Upon Involuntary Termination Without
Cause: In the case of Mr. Coleman, he will continue to
receive his base salary for the remainder of the then-current term.
In the case of Mr. Smith and Mr. Simaytis, each will continue to
receive their base salary through the end of the current term or
six months, whichever is longer.
Payments Made Upon a Change in Control: Some NEO’s
employment agreement contains change in control provisions. The
benefits, in addition to the items listed under the heading
“Payments Made Upon Any Termination” above include the
vesting of all outstanding stock options.
In the
case of Mr. Smith and Mr. Simaytis, each will continue to receive
their base salary through the end of the current term or six
months, whichever is longer.
Payments Made Upon Death or Permanent Disability: In
the event of the death or permanent disability of an NEO, the
executive or personal representative or estate, as applicable,
would receive, in addition to the items listed under the heading
“Payments Made Upon Any Termination” above the vesting
of all outstanding stock options.
In the
case of Mr. Smith and Mr. Simaytis, each will continue to receive
their base salary through the end of the current term or six
months, whichever is longer.
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN
BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER
MATTERS
The
following tables set forth information regarding (a) the ownership
of any non-management person known to us to own more than five
percent of any class of our voting common stock, and (b) the number
and percentage of our shares of common stock held by each director,
each of the named executive officers and directors and officers as
a group. Percentages of ownership have been calculated based
upon 4,680,871 shares of common stock issued and outstanding
as of December 28, 2018.
Security Ownership of Non-Management Owners
Name and address of Beneficial Owner
|
|
Title of class
|
Amount and nature of beneficial ownership
(1)
|
Percent of class
|
Jerry Smith (2)
|
|
Common
Stock
|
479,725
|
10.2%
|
Barbara Rydesky (3)
|
|
Common
Stock
|
555,253
|
11.9%
|
Ephraim Fields (4)
|
|
Common
Stock
|
340,782
|
7.3%
|
1)
Beneficial
ownership is calculated in accordance with Rule 13d-3(d)(1) of the
Exchange Act, and includes shares held outright, shares held by
entity(s) controlled by NEOs and/or Directors, and shares issuable
upon exercise of options or warrants which are exercisable on or
within 60 days of April
9, 2019.
2)
The number of
shares comprising Mr. Smith’s beneficial ownership is based
upon the written representations of his legal
counsel. Mr. Smith’s
address is: care of
Command Center, Inc., 3609 S Wadsworth Blvd., Suite 250 Lakewood,
CO 80235.
3)
The number of
shares comprising Mrs. Rydesky’s beneficial ownership is
based upon the written representations of Barbara Rydesky. Mrs.
Rydesky’s address is: 3238 Pine Lake Road, Orchard Lake, MI
48234.
4)
The number of
shares comprising Mr. Fields' beneficial ownership, over which Mr.
Fields has sole voting and sole dipositive power, is based upon the
Schedule 13G/A filed by Ephraim Fields on February 11, 2019. Mr.
Fields' address is: care of Echo Lake Capital, 501 Madison Avenue,
Floor 12A, New York, NY 10022.
Security Ownership of Management
Name and
address of Beneficial Owner (1)
|
|
Title of class
|
Amount and nature of beneficial ownership
(2)
|
Percent of class
|
Richard K. Coleman, Jr. (3)
|
|
Common
Stock
|
55,000
|
1.2%
|
Brendan Simaytis (4)
|
|
Common
Stock
|
17,958
|
*
|
Cory Smith (5)
|
|
Common
Stock
|
3,333
|
*
|
JD Smith (6)
|
|
Common
Stock
|
42,274
|
*
|
Steven P. Oman (7)
|
|
Common
Stock
|
8,442
|
*
|
R. Rimmy Malhotra (8)
|
|
Common
Stock
|
140,510
|
3.0%
|
Steven Bathgate (9)
|
|
Common
Stock
|
114,445
|
2.4%
|
Galen Vetter (10)
|
|
Common
Stock
|
10,581
|
*
|
Lawrence F. Hagenbuch (11)
|
|
Common
Stock
|
2,278
|
*
|
All
Officers and Directors as a group (nine persons)
|
|
Common
Stock
|
394,821
|
8.4%
|
Ron
Junck (12)
|
|
Common
Stock
|
121,685
|
2.6%
|
Frederick
Sandford (13)
|
|
Common
Stock
|
16,250
|
*
|
*
Indicates ownership of less than 1.0%
1)
The
address of the NEOs and Directors is: care of Command
Center, Inc., 3609 S Wadsworth Blvd, Suite 250 Lakewood, CO
80235.
2)
Beneficial ownership is calculated in accordance
with Rule 13d-3(d)(1) of the Exchange Act, and includes shares held
outright, shares held by entities controlled by NEOs and/or
Directors, and shares issuable upon exercise of options or warrants
which are exercisable on or within 60 days of
April
9,
2019.
3)
Options
to purchase shares.
4)
Includes
6,500 shares held outright and options to purchase 11,458
shares.
5)
Includes
1,250 shares held outright and options to purchase 2,083
shares.
6)
Includes
30,191 shares held outright and options to purchase 12,083
shares.
7)
Shares
held outright.
8)
Includes
12,191 shares held outright, 123,944 shares held indirectly through
the Nicoya Fund, and options to purchase 4,375 shares. The shares
held by the Nicoya Fund are directly owned by the Nicoya Fund LLC,
a Delaware limited liability company. This reporting person is the
managing member and a co-owner of Nicoya Capital LLC, which is the
managing member and owner of the Nicoya Fund.
9)
Includes
27,155 shares held outright, 82,915 shares held indirectly,
including 66,666 by Mr. Bathgate’s spouse, 7,916 by the
Bathgate Family Partnership and 8,333 by Viva Co., LLC, and options
to purchase 4,375 shares.
10)
Includes
8,303 shares held outright and 2,278 shares held indirectly by
Vetter Community Resources, LLC.
11)
Shares
held outright.
12)
Includes 112,762 shares held outright, and 8,923 shares held
indirectly through Inland Empire Temporary Staffing Services LLC of
which Mr. Junck is a member.
13)
Shares held outright.
Equity Compensation Plans
At the
annual meeting of stockholders held on November 17, 2016, the
stockholders approved the adoption of the Command Center, Inc. 2016
Stock Incentive Plan (the "2016 Plan"). The 2008 Stock Incentive
Plan expired in January 2016, except as to awards that remain
outstanding under such plan.
Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation
Plans.
As of
December 28, 2018, we had one equity compensation plan, namely the
2016 Plan, approved by the stockholders on November 17, 2016.
Pursuant to the 2016 Plan, the Compensation Committee is authorized
to issue awards for up to 500,000 common shares over the 10-year
life of the 2016 Plan. Currently, there have been approximately
192,000 options and approximately 11,000 common shares granted
under the 2019 Plan.
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND
RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE
There
were no related party transactions during 2018 or
2017.
None of
our executive officers serve as a member of the Board of Directors
or Compensation Committee, or other committee serving an equivalent
function, of any other entity that has one or more of its executive
officers serving as a member of our Board of Directors or
Compensation Committee. None of the current members of our
Compensation Committee, nor any of their family members, has ever
been our employees.
Related Person Transactions Policy and Procedures
As set
forth in the written charter of the Audit Committee, any related
person transaction involving a Company director or executive
officer must be reviewed and approved by the Audit Committee. Any
member of the Audit Committee who is a related person with respect
to a transaction under review may not participate in the
deliberations or vote on the approval or ratification of the
transaction. Related persons include any director or executive
officer, certain stockholders and any of their “immediate
family members” (as defined by SEC regulations). In addition,
the Board of Directors determines on an annual basis which
directors meet the definition of independent director under the
NASDAQ Listing Rules and reviews any director relationship that
would potentially interfere with his or her exercise of independent
judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a
director.
Director Independence
Our
Board of Directors affirmatively determines the independence of
each director and nominee for election as a director in accordance
with certain criteria, which include all elements of independence
set forth in the related Securities and Exchange Commission Rules
and Regulations and the NASDAQ Listing Rules. As part of the Board
Committee meetings, and as they feel necessary or appropriate at
full Board meetings, the independent directors routinely meet in
executive session without management or any non-independent
directors present.
Based
on these standards and information provided by our Board of
Directors and officers, our Board of Directors determined that
Steven Bathgate, R. Rimmy Malhotra, JD Smith, Steven P. Oman, Galen
Vetter, and Lawrence F. Hagenbuch, all non-employee directors, are
independent and have no material relationship with the Company,
except as directors and as stockholders of the
Company.
ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND
SERVICES
The
Board of Directors selected Plante & Moran, PLLC ("Plante
Moran") as the independent registered public accounting firm to
examine our consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year
ended December 28, 2018. The Board of Directors selected EKS&H
LLLP ("EKS&H") as the independent registered public accounting
firm to examine our consolidated financial statements for the
fiscal year ended December 29, 2017.
The
following table summarizes the fees that Plante Moran and EKS&H
charged us for the listed services during 2018 and
2017:
Type of fee
|
2018
|
2017
|
Audit fee (1)
|
$110,245
|
$56,611
|
Audit related fees (2)
|
-
|
-
|
Tax fees (3)
|
-
|
-
|
All other fees (4)
|
-
|
-
|
|
$110,245
|
$56,611
|
1)
Audit fees consist
of fees billed for professional services provided in connection
with the audit of the Company’s consolidated financial
statements and reviews of our quarterly consolidated financial
statements.
2)
Audit related fees
consist of assurance and related services that include, but are not
limited to, internal control reviews, attest services not required
by statute or regulation and consultation concerning financial
accounting and reporting standards, and not reported under
“Audit fees.”
3)
Tax fees consist of
the aggregate fees billed for professional services for tax
compliance, tax advice, and tax planning. These services include
preparation of federal income tax returns.
4)
All other fees
consist of fees billed for products and services other than the
services reported above.
Our
Audit Committee reviewed the audit and tax services rendered by
Plante Moran and concluded that such services were compatible with
maintaining the auditors’ independence. All audit, non-audit,
tax services, and other services performed by our independent
accountants are pre-approved by our Audit Committee to assure that
such services do not impair the auditors’ independence from
us. We do not use Plante Moran for financial information system
design and implementation. These services, which include designing
or implementing a system that aggregates source data underlying the
financial statements, or generates information that is significant
to our financial statements, are provided internally. We do not
engage Plante Moran to provide compliance outsourcing
services.
PART IV
ITEM 15. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL
STATEMENT SCHEDULES
Documents
filed as part of this Form 10-K or incorporated by
reference:
1)
Our consolidated
financial statements can be found in Item 8 of this Form
10-K.
2)
Consolidated
Financial Statement Schedules (omitted because they are either not
required, are not applicable, or the required information is
disclosed in the notes to the consolidated financial statements or
related notes).
3)
The following
exhibits are filed with this Annual Report on Form 10-K or
incorporated by reference:
Exhibit No.
|
Description
|
Articles of Incorporation.
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Form SB-2, as filed May
7, 2001.
|
|
Amendment to the Articles
of Incorporation. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to Form
8-K, as filed November 16, 2005.
|
|
Amendment to the Articles
of Incorporation. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.3 to Form
S-1, as filed January 14, 2008.
|
|
Amended and Restated
Bylaws, as of September 5, 2017. Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 3.4 to Form 8-K as filed on September 8, 2017.
|
|
Amendment to the Articles
of Incorporation. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.5 to Form
8-K, as filed December 7, 2017.
|
|
Form of Common Stock Share
Certificate. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Form S-1
as filed January 14, 2008.
|
|
Executive Employment
Agreement with Richard K. Coleman, Jr. Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K as filed on April 2, 2018.
|
|
Executive Employment
Agreement with Cory Smith. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.2 to Form 8-K as filed on July 6, 2018.
|
|
Executive Employment
Agreement with Brendan Simaytis. Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.3 to Form 8-K as filed on July 6, 2018.
|
|
Command Center, Inc. 2016
Stock Incentive Plan. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4
included as Appendix B to Form DEF 14A as filed October 11,
2016.
|
|
Account Purchase Agreement
by and between Command Center, Inc. and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.,
dated May 12, 2016. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to
Form 10-Q as filed on May 15, 2017.
|
|
Executive Severance
Agreement with Frederick Sandford dated March 28, 2018.
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to Form 8-K as filed on
April 3, 2018.
|
|
Executive Severance
Agreement with Ronald L. Junck dated May 25, 2018. Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.7 to Form 8-K as filed on June 1,
2018.
|
|
Settlement agreement with Ephraim Fields, Echo Lake Capital, Keith
Rosenbloom, Lawrence F. Hagenbuch, Randall Bort, and Sean Gelston
dated April 16, 2018. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 to
Form 8-K as filed on April 18, 2018.
|
|
Executive Employment
Agreement with Richard K. Coleman, Jr. Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.9 to Form 8-K as filed on April 4, 2019.
|
|
Standard of Ethics and
Business Conduct. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 14.1 to Form
10-K as filed on April 11, 2017.
|
|
List of Subsidiaries (filed
herewith).
|
|
Consent of Plante Moran
(filed herewith).
|
|
Consent of EKS&H (filed
herewith).
|
|
Certification of Chief
Executive Officer-Section 302 Certification (filed
herewith).
|
|
Certification of Chief
Financial Officer-Section 302 Certification (filed
herewith).
|
|
Certification of Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted in Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 (filed herewith).
|
|
101.INS
|
XBRL Instance Document
(filed herewith).
|
101.SCH
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension
Schema Document (filed herewith).
|
101.CAL
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension
Calculation Linkbase Document (filed herewith).
|
101.DEF
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension
Definition Linkbase Document (filed herewith).
|
101.LAB
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension
Label Linkbase Document (filed herewith).
|
101.PRE
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension
Presentation Linkbase Document (filed herewith).
|
ITEM 16. FORM 10-K SUMMARY
None.
SIGNATURES
In
accordance with Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, the
registrant caused this Form 10-K to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
COMMAND
CENTER, INC.
/s/ Richard K. Coleman, Jr.
|
|
Richard K. Coleman, Jr.
|
|
April
9, 2019
|
Signature
|
|
Printed Name
|
|
Date
|
President, Chief Executive Officer, Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Cory Smith
|
|
Cory Smith
|
|
April
9, 2019
|
Signature
|
|
Printed Name
|
|
Date
|
Chief Financial Officer
|
|
|
|
|
POWER OF ATTORNEY
Each person whose individual signature appears below hereby
authorizes and appoints Richard K. Coleman, Jr. and Cory Smith, and
each of them, with full power of substitution and resubstitution
and full power to act without the other, as his true and lawful
attorney-in-fact and agent to act in his name, place and stead and
to execute in the name and on behalf of each person, individually
and in each capacity stated below, and to file any and all
amendments to this annual report on Form 10-K and to file the same,
with all exhibits thereto, and other documents in connection
therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting
unto said attorneys-in-fact and agents, and each of them, full
power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing,
ratifying and confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact and agents
or any of them or their or his substitute or substitutes may
lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue
thereof.
In
accordance with the Exchange Act, this Form 10-K has been signed
below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in
the capacities and on the dates indicated.
/s/ JD Smith
|
|
JD Smith
|
|
April
9, 2019
|
Signature
|
|
Printed Name
|
|
Date
|
Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ R. Rimmy Malhotra
|
|
R. Rimmy Malhotra
|
|
April
9,
2019
|
Signature
|
|
Printed Name
|
|
Date
|
Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Steven Bathgate
|
|
Steven Bathgate
|
|
April
9,
2019
|
Signature
|
|
Printed Name
|
|
Date
|
Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Seven P. Oman
|
|
Steven P. Oman
|
|
April
9,
2019
|
Signature
|
|
Printed Name
|
|
Date
|
Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Galen Vetter
|
|
Galen Vetter
|
|
April
9,
2019
|
Signature
|
|
Printed Name
|
|
Date
|
Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Lawrence F. Hagenbuch
|
|
Lawrence F. Hagenbuch
|
|
April
9,
2019
|
Signature
|
|
Printed Name
|
|
Date
|
Director
|
|
|
|
|
52