HOLLY ENERGY PARTNERS LP - Quarter Report: 2007 June (Form 10-Q)
Table of Contents
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
þ | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2007
OR
o | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to .
Commission File Number: 1-32225
HOLLY ENERGY PARTNERS, L.P.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware | 20-0833098 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of | (I.R.S. Employer | |
incorporation or organization) | Identification No.) |
100 Crescent Court, Suite 1600
Dallas, Texas 75201-6915
Dallas, Texas 75201-6915
(Address of principal executive offices)
(214) 871-3555
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
None
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12
months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and
(2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of accelerated filer and large accelerated
filer in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer o | Accelerated filer þ | Non-accelerated filer o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined by Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act).
Yes o No þ
The number of the registrants outstanding common units at July 20, 2007 was 8,170,000.
HOLLY ENERGY PARTNERS, L.P.
INDEX
INDEX
- 2 -
Table of Contents
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains certain forward-looking statements within the meaning
of the federal securities laws. All statements, other than statements of historical fact included
in this Form 10-Q, including, but not limited to, those under Results of Operations and
Liquidity and Capital Resources in Item 2 Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations in Part I are forward-looking statements. These statements
are based on managements beliefs and assumptions using currently available information and
expectations as of the date hereof, are not guarantees of future performance, and involve certain
risks and uncertainties. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in these
forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot assure you that our expectations will prove
correct. Therefore, actual outcomes and results could differ materially from what is expressed,
implied or forecast in these statements. Any differences could be caused by a number of factors,
including, but not limited to:
| Risks and uncertainties with respect to the actual quantities of petroleum products
shipped on our pipelines and/or terminalled in our terminals; |
||
| The economic viability of Holly Corporation, Alon USA, Inc. and our other customers; |
||
| The demand for refined petroleum products in markets we serve; |
||
| Our ability to successfully purchase and integrate additional operations in the future; |
||
| Our ability to complete previously announced pending or contemplated acquisitions; |
||
| The availability and cost of our financing; |
||
| The possibility of reductions in production or shutdowns at refineries utilizing our
pipeline and terminal facilities; |
||
| The effects of current and future government regulations and policies; |
||
| Our operational efficiency in carrying out routine operations and capital construction projects; |
||
| The possibility of terrorist attacks and the consequences of any such attacks; |
||
| General economic conditions; and |
||
| Other financial, operations and legal risks and uncertainties detailed from time to time
in our Securities and Exchange Commission filings. |
Cautionary statements identifying important factors that could cause actual results to differ
materially from our expectations are set forth in this Form 10-Q, including without limitation, in
conjunction with the forward-looking statements included in this Form 10-Q that are referred to
above. When considering forward-looking statements, you should keep in mind the risk factors and
other cautionary statements set forth in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December
31, 2006 in Risk Factors, and in this Form 10-Q in Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations. All forward-looking statements included in this
Form 10-Q and all subsequent written or oral forward-looking statements attributable to us or
persons acting on our behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by these cautionary
statements. The forward-looking statements speak only as of the date made and, other than as
required by law, we undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking
statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.
- 3 -
Table of Contents
Item 1. Financial Statements
Holly Energy Partners, L.P.
Consolidated Balance Sheets
June 30, 2007 | December 31, | |||||||
(Unaudited) | 2006 | |||||||
(In thousands, except unit data) | ||||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||
Current assets: |
||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 11,563 | $ | 11,555 | ||||
Accounts receivable: |
||||||||
Trade |
4,575 | 7,339 | ||||||
Affiliates |
3,891 | 3,518 | ||||||
8,466 | 10,857 | |||||||
Prepaid and other current assets |
938 | 1,212 | ||||||
Total current assets |
20,967 | 23,624 | ||||||
Properties and equipment, net |
156,671 | 160,484 | ||||||
Transportation agreements, net |
55,272 | 56,821 | ||||||
Other assets |
2,279 | 2,644 | ||||||
Total assets |
$ | 235,189 | $ | 243,573 | ||||
LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS EQUITY |
||||||||
Current liabilities: |
||||||||
Accounts payable |
$ | 1,872 | $ | 3,781 | ||||
Accrued interest |
2,932 | 2,941 | ||||||
Deferred revenue |
4,495 | 5,486 | ||||||
Accrued property taxes |
614 | 868 | ||||||
Other current liabilities |
721 | 1,098 | ||||||
Total current liabilities |
10,634 | 14,174 | ||||||
Commitments and contingencies |
| | ||||||
Long-term debt |
181,443 | 180,660 | ||||||
Other long-term liabilities |
970 | 1,550 | ||||||
Minority interest |
11,003 | 10,963 | ||||||
Partners equity (deficit): |
||||||||
Common unitholders (8,170,000 units issued and outstanding) |
174,248 | 176,844 | ||||||
Subordinated unitholders (7,000,000 units issued and outstanding) |
(72,131 | ) | (70,022 | ) | ||||
Class B subordinated unitholders (937,500 units issued and
outstanding) |
23,186 | 23,469 | ||||||
General partner interest (2% interest) |
(94,164 | ) | (94,065 | ) | ||||
Total partners equity |
31,139 | 36,226 | ||||||
Total liabilities and partners equity |
$ | 235,189 | $ | 243,573 | ||||
See accompanying notes.
- 4 -
Table of Contents
Holly Energy Partners, L.P.
Consolidated Statements of Income
(Unaudited)
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2007 | 2006 | 2007 | 2006 | |||||||||||||
(In thousands, except per unit data) | ||||||||||||||||
Revenues: |
||||||||||||||||
Affiliates |
$ | 16,353 | $ | 10,584 | $ | 30,115 | $ | 23,066 | ||||||||
Third parties |
10,778 | 7,943 | 20,888 | 17,899 | ||||||||||||
27,131 | 18,527 | 51,003 | 40,965 | |||||||||||||
Operating costs and expenses: |
||||||||||||||||
Operations |
8,263 | 7,429 | 16,040 | 14,538 | ||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
3,208 | 3,781 | 7,279 | 7,574 | ||||||||||||
General and administrative |
1,275 | 1,289 | 2,562 | 2,513 | ||||||||||||
12,746 | 12,499 | 25,881 | 24,625 | |||||||||||||
Operating income |
14,385 | 6,028 | 25,122 | 16,340 | ||||||||||||
Other income (expense): |
||||||||||||||||
Interest income |
145 | 245 | 330 | 488 | ||||||||||||
Interest expense |
(3,371 | ) | (3,247 | ) | (6,729 | ) | (6,422 | ) | ||||||||
Gain on sale of assets |
1 | | 298 | | ||||||||||||
(3,225 | ) | (3,002 | ) | (6,101 | ) | (5,934 | ) | |||||||||
Income before minority interest |
11,160 | 3,026 | 19,021 | 10,406 | ||||||||||||
Minority interest in Rio Grande Pipeline Company |
(154 | ) | (28 | ) | (581 | ) | (273 | ) | ||||||||
Net income |
11,006 | 2,998 | 18,440 | 10,133 | ||||||||||||
Less general partner interest in net income |
726 | 319 | 1,306 | 646 | ||||||||||||
Limited partners interest in net income |
$ | 10,280 | $ | 2,679 | $ | 17,134 | $ | 9,487 | ||||||||
Net income per limited partner unit -
basic and diluted |
$ | 0.64 | $ | 0.17 | $ | 1.06 | $ | 0.59 | ||||||||
Weighted average limited partners units
outstanding |
16,108 | 16,108 | 16,108 | 16,108 | ||||||||||||
See accompanying notes.
- 5 -
Table of Contents
Holly Energy Partners, L.P.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Unaudited)
Six Months Ended June 30, | ||||||||
2007 | 2006 | |||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Cash flows from operating activities |
||||||||
Net income |
$ | 18,440 | $ | 10,133 | ||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: |
||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
7,279 | 7,574 | ||||||
Minority interest in Rio Grande Pipeline Company |
581 | 273 | ||||||
Amortization of restricted and performance units |
763 | 409 | ||||||
Gain on sale of assets |
(298 | ) | | |||||
(Increase) decrease in current assets: |
||||||||
Accounts receivable trade |
2,764 | (759 | ) | |||||
Accounts receivable affiliates |
(373 | ) | 333 | |||||
Prepaid and other current assets |
274 | 172 | ||||||
Increase (decrease) in current liabilities: |
||||||||
Accounts payable |
(1,909 | ) | 398 | |||||
Accrued interest |
(9 | ) | 32 | |||||
Deferred revenue |
(991 | ) | 3,916 | |||||
Accrued property tax |
(254 | ) | (188 | ) | ||||
Other current liabilities |
(377 | ) | (12 | ) | ||||
Other, net |
572 | 205 | ||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
26,462 | 22,486 | ||||||
Cash flows from investing activities |
||||||||
Additions to properties and equipment |
(1,933 | ) | (3,699 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from sale of assets |
325 | | ||||||
Net cash used for investing activities |
(1,608 | ) | (3,699 | ) | ||||
Cash flows from financing activities |
||||||||
Distributions to partners |
(23,382 | ) | (21,244 | ) | ||||
Purchase of units for restricted grants |
(908 | ) | (512 | ) | ||||
Cash distributions to minority interest |
(540 | ) | (1,200 | ) | ||||
Other |
(16 | ) | | |||||
Net cash used for financing activities |
(24,846 | ) | (22,956 | ) | ||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
||||||||
Increase (decrease) for period |
8 | (4,169 | ) | |||||
Beginning of period |
11,555 | 20,583 | ||||||
End of period |
$ | 11,563 | $ | 16,414 | ||||
See accompanying notes.
- 6 -
Table of Contents
Holly Energy Partners, L.P.
Consolidated Statement of Partners Equity (Deficit)
(Unaudited)
Class B | ||||||||||||||||||||
Common | Subordinated | Subordinated | General Partner | |||||||||||||||||
Units | Units | Units | Interest | Total | ||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Balance December 31, 2006 |
$ | 176,844 | $ | (70,022 | ) | $ | 23,469 | $ | (94,065 | ) | $ | 36,226 | ||||||||
Distributions to partners |
(11,142 | ) | (9,555 | ) | (1,280 | ) | (1,405 | ) | (23,382 | ) | ||||||||||
Purchase of units for
restricted grants |
(908 | ) | | | | (908 | ) | |||||||||||||
Amortization of
restricted and
performance units |
763 | | | | 763 | |||||||||||||||
Net income |
8,691 | 7,446 | 997 | 1,306 | 18,440 | |||||||||||||||
Balance June 30, 2007 |
$ | 174,248 | $ | (72,131 | ) | $ | 23,186 | $ | (94,164 | ) | $ | 31,139 | ||||||||
See accompanying notes.
- 7 -
Table of Contents
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
(Unaudited)
Note 1: Description of Business and Presentation of Financial Statements
Holly Energy Partners, L.P. (HEP) together with its consolidated subsidiaries, is a publicly held
master limited partnership, currently 45% owned by Holly Corporation and its subsidiaries
(collectively Holly). HEP commenced operations July 13, 2004 upon the completion of its initial
public offering. In this document, the words we, our, ours and us refer to HEP unless the
context otherwise indicates.
We operate in one business segment the operation of petroleum pipelines and terminal facilities.
One of Hollys wholly-owned subsidiaries owns a refinery in Artesia, New Mexico, which Holly
operates in conjunction with crude, vacuum distillation and other facilities situated in Lovington,
New Mexico (collectively, the Navajo Refinery). In July 2005, we acquired the two parallel
intermediate feedstock pipelines which connect the Lovington, New Mexico and Artesia, New Mexico
refining facilities. The Navajo Refinery produces high-value refined products such as gasoline,
diesel fuel and jet fuel and serves markets in the southwestern United States and northern Mexico.
We operate refined product pipelines as part of the product distribution network of the Navajo
Refinery. Our terminal operations serving the Navajo Refinery include a truck rack at the Navajo
Refinery and five integrated refined product terminals located in New Mexico, Texas and Arizona.
Another of Hollys wholly-owned subsidiaries owns a refinery located near Salt Lake City, Utah (the
Woods Cross Refinery). Our operations serving the Woods Cross Refinery include a truck rack at
the Woods Cross Refinery, a refined product terminal in Spokane, Washington and a 50% non-operating
interest in product terminals in Boise and Burley, Idaho.
In February 2005, we acquired from Alon USA, Inc. and several of its wholly-owned subsidiaries
(collectively, Alon) four refined products pipelines, an associated tank farm and two refined
products terminals. These pipelines and terminals are located primarily in Texas and transport and
terminal light refined products for Alons refinery in Big Spring, Texas.
Additionally, we own a refined product terminal in Mountain Home, Idaho, and a 70% interest in Rio
Grande Pipeline Company (Rio Grande), which provides transportation of liquid petroleum gases to
northern Mexico.
The consolidated financial statements for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006
included herein have been prepared without audit, pursuant to the rules and regulations of the
United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC). The interim financial statements
reflect all adjustments which, in the opinion of management, are necessary for a fair presentation
of our results for the interim periods. Such adjustments are considered to be of a normal
recurring nature. Although certain notes and other information required by accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America have been condensed or omitted, we believe that
the disclosures in these consolidated financial statements are adequate to make the information
presented not misleading. These consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction
with our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006. Results of operations for interim periods
are not necessarily indicative of the results of operations that will be realized for the year
ending December 31, 2007. Certain reclassifications have been made to prior reported amounts to
conform to current classifications.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
Interpretation No. 48 Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes
In June 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Interpretation No. 48,
Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes. This interpretation clarifies the accounting for
uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an enterprises financial statements by prescribing a
recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and
measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. This interpretation
also provides guidance on
- 8 -
Table of Contents
derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure
and transition. We adopted this standard effective January 1, 2007. The adoption of this standard
did not have a material impact on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
Note 2: Properties and Equipment
June 30, | December 31, | |||||||
2007 | 2006 | |||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Pipelines and terminals |
$ | 196,308 | $ | 195,688 | ||||
Land and right of way |
22,825 | 22,486 | ||||||
Other |
5,294 | 5,267 | ||||||
Construction in progress |
2,745 | 1,539 | ||||||
227,172 | 224,980 | |||||||
Less accumulated depreciation |
70,501 | 64,496 | ||||||
$ | 156,671 | $ | 160,484 | |||||
During the three and six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, we did not capitalize any
interest related to major construction projects.
Note 3: Transportation Agreements
Our transportation agreements consist of the following:
| Costs incurred by Rio Grande in constructing certain pipeline and terminal facilities
located in Mexico, which were then contributed to an affiliate of Pemex, the national oil
company of Mexico. In exchange, Rio Grande received a 10-year transportation agreement
from BP plc (BP). The initial 10-year term of this agreement expired in April 2007 and
was extended for an additional year. This agreement will continue on a year-to-year basis
unless cancelled by either party prior to the end of the previous contract year. The
carrying amount of this asset was fully amortized and retired as of June 30, 2007. |
|
| A portion of the total purchase price of the Alon assets was allocated to the
transportation agreement asset based on an estimated fair value derived under the income
approach. This asset is being amortized over 30 years ending 2035, the 15-year initial
term of the pipelines and terminals agreement with Alon plus the expected 15-year extension
period. |
The carrying amounts of our transportation agreements are as follows:
June 30, | December 31, | |||||||
2007 | 2006 | |||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Rio Grande transportation agreement |
$ | | $ | 20,836 | ||||
Alon transportation agreement |
59,933 | 59,933 | ||||||
59,933 | 80,769 | |||||||
Less accumulated amortization |
4,661 | 23,948 | ||||||
$ | 55,272 | $ | 56,821 | |||||
Note 4: Debt
Credit Agreement
We have a four-year, $100.0 million senior secured revolving credit agreement (the Credit
Agreement) expiring in July 2008. Union Bank of California, N.A. is one of the lenders and serves
as administrative agent under this agreement. As of June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, we had no
amounts outstanding under the Credit Agreement.
- 9 -
Table of Contents
The Credit Agreement is available to fund capital expenditures, acquisitions, and working capital
and for general partnership purposes. Advances under the Credit Agreement that are designated for
working capital are short-term liabilities. Other advances under the Credit Agreement are
classified as long-term liabilities. In addition, the Credit Agreement is available to fund
letters of credit up to a $50.0 million sub-limit. Up to $5.0 million is available to fund
distributions to unitholders.
We have the right to request an increase in the maximum amount of the Credit Agreement, up to
$175.0 million. Such request will become effective if (a) certain conditions specified in the
Credit Agreement are met and (b) existing lenders under the Credit Agreement or other financial
institutions reasonably acceptable to the administrative agent commit to lend such increased
amounts under the agreement.
Our obligations under the Credit Agreement are secured by substantially all of our assets.
Indebtedness under the Credit Agreement is recourse to HEP Logistics Holdings, L.P., our general
partner, and guaranteed by our wholly-owned subsidiaries.
We may prepay all loans at any time without penalty. We are required to reduce all working capital
borrowings under the Credit Agreement to zero for a period of at least 15 consecutive days once
each twelve-month period prior to the maturity date of the agreement.
Indebtedness under the Credit Agreement bears interest, at our option, at either (a) the base rate
as announced by the administrative agent plus an applicable margin (ranging from 0.25% to 1.00%) or
(b) at a rate equal to the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) plus an applicable margin
(ranging from 1.50% to 2.25%). In each case, the applicable margin is based upon the ratio of our
funded debt (as defined in the agreement) to EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation
and amortization, as defined in the Credit Agreement). We incur a commitment fee on the unused
portion of the Credit Agreement at a rate of 0.375% or 0.500% based upon the ratio of our funded
debt to EBITDA for the four most recently completed fiscal quarters. At June 30, 2007, we are
subject to the 0.500% rate on the $100.0 million of the unused commitment on the Credit Agreement.
The agreement matures in July 2008. At that time, the agreement will terminate and all outstanding
amounts thereunder will be due and payable.
The Credit Agreement imposes certain requirements, including: a prohibition against distribution to
unitholders if, before or after the distribution, a potential default or an event of default as
defined in the agreement would occur; limitations on our ability to incur debt, make loans, acquire
other companies, change the nature of our business, enter a merger or consolidation, or sell
assets; and covenants that require maintenance of EBITDA to interest expense ratio and debt to
EBITDA ratio. If an event of default exists under the agreement, the lenders will be able to
accelerate the maturity of the debt and exercise other rights and remedies.
Senior Notes Due 2015
Our senior notes maturing March 1, 2015 are registered with the SEC and bear interest at 6.25%
(Senior Notes). The Senior Notes are unsecured and impose certain restrictive covenants,
including limitations on our ability to incur additional indebtedness, make investments, sell
assets, incur certain liens, pay distributions, enter into transactions with affiliates, and enter
into mergers. At any time when the Senior Notes are rated investment grade by both Moodys and
Standard & Poors and no default or event of default exists, we will not be subject to many of the
foregoing covenants. Additionally, we have certain redemption rights under the Senior Notes.
The $185.0 million principal amount of Senior Notes is recorded at $181.4 million on our
consolidated balance sheets at June 30, 2007. The difference of $3.6 million is due to $2.9
million of unamortized discount and $0.7 million relating to the fair value of the interest rate
swap contract discussed below.
- 10 -
Table of Contents
Interest Rate Risk Management
We have entered into an interest rate swap contract to effectively convert the interest expense
associated with $60.0 million of our 6.25% Senior Notes from a fixed rate to a variable rate. The
interest rate on the $60.0 million notional amount is equal to three-month LIBOR plus an applicable
margin of 1.1575%, which equaled an effective interest rate of 6.56% on $60.0 million of the debt
during the six months ended June 30, 2007. The maturity of the swap contract is March 1, 2015,
matching the maturity of the Senior Notes.
This interest rate swap has been designated as a fair value hedge as defined by SFAS No. 133. Our
interest rate swap meets the conditions required to assume no ineffectiveness under SFAS No. 133
and, therefore, we have used the shortcut method of accounting prescribed for fair value hedges
by Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (SFAS) No. 133. Accordingly, we adjust the
carrying value of the swap to its fair value each quarter, with an offsetting entry to adjust the
carrying value of the debt securities whose fair value is being hedged. We record interest expense
equal to the variable rate payments under the swap.
The fair value of our interest rate swap of $0.7 million and $1.2 million is included in Other
long-term liabilities in our consolidated balance sheets at June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006,
respectively. The offsetting entry to adjust the carrying value of the debt securities whose fair
value is being hedged is recognized as a reduction of Long-term debt on our consolidated balance
sheets at June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006.
Other Debt Information
Six Months Ended | ||||||||
June 30, | ||||||||
2007 | 2006 | |||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Interest on outstanding debt: |
||||||||
Senior Notes, net of interest rate swap |
$ | 5,874 | $ | 5,690 | ||||
Amortization of discount and deferred issuance costs |
607 | 484 | ||||||
Commitment fees |
248 | 248 | ||||||
Net interest expense |
$ | 6,729 | $ | 6,422 | ||||
Cash paid for interest(1) |
$ | 6,259 | $ | 5,906 | ||||
(1) | Net of cash received under our interest rate swap agreement of $1.9 million for the
six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006. |
The estimated fair value of our Senior Notes was $173.0 million at June 30, 2007.
Note 5: Employees, Retirement and Benefit Plans
Employees who provide direct services to us are employed by Holly Logistic Services, L.L.C., a
Holly subsidiary. Their costs, including salaries, bonuses, payroll taxes, benefits, and other
direct costs, are charged to us monthly under certain provisions of an omnibus agreement we entered
into with Holly in July 2004 (the Omnibus Agreement).
These employees participate in the retirement and benefit plans of Holly. Our share of retirement
and benefits costs was $0.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006 and $0.8
million and $0.6 million for the six months ended June 30 2007 and 2006, respectively.
We have adopted a Long-Term Incentive Plan for employees, consultants and directors who perform
services for us. The Long-Term Incentive Plan consists of four components: restricted units,
performance units, unit options and unit appreciation rights.
- 11 -
Table of Contents
On June 30, 2007, we had two types of equity-based compensation, which are described below. The
compensation cost charged against income for these plans was $0.5 million and $0.2 million for the
three months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively, and $0.8 million and $0.4 million for the
six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively. It is currently our policy to purchase
units in the open market instead of issuing new units for settlement of restricted unit grants. At
June 30, 2007, 350,000 units were authorized to be granted under the equity-based compensation
plans, of which 253,255 had not yet been granted.
Restricted Units
Under our Long-Term Incentive Plan, we grant restricted units to selected employees, consultants
and directors who perform services for us, with vesting generally over a period of one to five
years. Although full ownership of the units does not transfer to the recipients until the units
vest, the recipients have distribution and voting rights on these units from the date of grant.
The vesting for certain key executives is contingent upon certain earnings per unit targets being
realized. The fair value of each unit of restricted unit awards was measured at the market price
as of the date of grant and is being amortized over the vesting period, including the units issued
to the key executives, as we expect those units to fully vest.
A summary of restricted unit activity as of June 30, 2007, and changes during the six months ended
June 30, 2007, is presented below:
Weighted- | ||||||||||||||||
Weighted- | Average | Aggregate | ||||||||||||||
Average | Remaining | Intrinsic | ||||||||||||||
Grant-Date | Contractual | Value | ||||||||||||||
Restricted Units | Grants | Fair Value | Term | ($000) | ||||||||||||
Outstanding January 1, 2007 (not vested) |
36,597 | 40.21 | ||||||||||||||
Granted |
19,687 | 46.12 | ||||||||||||||
Forfeited |
(1,555 | ) | 45.94 | |||||||||||||
Vesting and transfer of full ownership to recipients |
(4,170 | ) | 39.45 | |||||||||||||
Outstanding at June 30, 2007 (not vested) |
50,559 | $ | 42.02 | 1.1 years | $ | 2,573 | ||||||||||
There were 4,170 units vested and transferred to recipients during the six months ended June 30,
2007. As of June 30, 2007, there was $0.8 million of total unrecognized compensation costs related
to nonvested restricted unit grants. That cost is expected to be recognized over a
weighted-average period of 1.1 years.
Performance Units
Under our Long-Term Incentive Plan, we grant performance units to selected executives and employees
who perform services for us. These performance units are payable upon meeting the performance
criteria over a service period, and generally vest over a period of three years. The amount
payable under the initial performance grant of 1,514 units in 2005 is based upon our unit price and
upon our total unitholder return during the requisite period as compared to the total unitholder
return of a selected peer group of partnerships. The amount payable under all other performance
unit grants is based upon the growth in distributions per limited partner unit during the requisite
period.
We granted 12,321 performance units to certain officers in February 2007. These units will vest
over a three-year performance period ending December 31, 2009, and are payable in HEP common units.
The number of units actually earned will be based on the growth of distributions to limited
partners over the performance period, and can range from 50% to 150% of the number of performance
units issued. The fair value of these performance units is based on the grant date closing unit
price of $46.12 and will apply to the number of units ultimately awarded.
- 12 -
Table of Contents
A summary of performance units activity as of June 30, 2007 and changes during the six months ended
June 30, 2007 is presented below:
Payable | ||||
Performance Units | In Units | |||
Outstanding at January 1, 2007 (not vested) |
14,015 | |||
Vesting and payment of cash benefit to recipients |
| |||
Granted |
12,321 | |||
Forfeited |
(2,188 | ) | ||
Outstanding at June 30, 2007 (not vested) |
24,148 | |||
There were no payments for performance units vesting during the six months ended June 30,
2007. Based on the weighted average fair value at June 30, 2007 of $47.62, there was $0.6 million
of total unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested performance units. That cost is
expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.9 years.
Note 6: Significant Customers
All revenues are domestic revenues, of which over 90% are currently generated from our three
largest customers: Holly, Alon and BP. The major concentration of our petroleum products pipeline
systems revenue is derived from activities conducted in the southwest United States. The
following table presents the percentage of total revenues generated by each of these three
customers:
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2007 | 2006 | 2007 | 2006 | |||||||||||||
Holly |
60 | % | 57 | % | 59 | % | 56 | % | ||||||||
Alon |
29 | % | 30 | % | 28 | % | 30 | % | ||||||||
BP |
7 | % | 9 | % | 10 | % | 10 | % |
Note 7: Related Party Transactions
Holly
We serve Hollys refineries in New Mexico and Utah under two 15-year pipeline and terminal
agreements. One of these agreements relates to the pipelines and terminals contributed by Holly to
us at the time of our initial public offering and expires in 2019 (Holly PTA). Our other
agreement with Holly relates to the Intermediate Pipelines acquired from Holly in July 2005 and
expires in 2020 (Holly IPA). The substantial majority of our business is devoted to providing
transportation and terminalling services to Holly. The minimum revenue commitments under the Holly
PTA and the Holly IPA increase each year at a rate equal to the percentage change in the producer
price index (PPI), but will not decrease as a result of a decrease in the PPI.
Following the July 1, 2007 PPI rate adjustment, the volume commitments by Holly under the Holly PTA
will produce at least $39.6 million of revenue for the twelve months ending June 30, 2008. Under
the Holly IPA, Holly agreed to transport volumes of intermediate products on the Intermediate
Pipelines that following the July 1, 2007 PPI rate adjustment, will result in minimum funds to us
of $12.8 million for the twelve months ended June 30, 2008.
If Holly fails to meet its minimum revenue commitments in any quarter, it is required to pay us in
cash the amount of any shortfall by the last day of the month following the end of the quarter. A
shortfall payment may be applied as a credit in the following four quarters after Hollys minimum
obligations are met.
Under certain provisions of the Omnibus Agreement that we entered with Holly in July 2004 and
expires in 2019, we pay Holly an annual administrative fee, initially $2.0 million for each of the
three years following the closing of our initial public offering, for the provision by Holly or its
affiliates of various
- 13 -
Table of Contents
general and administrative services to us. Effective July 1, 2007, the annual fee increased to
$2.3 million in accordance with provisions under the agreement. This fee does not include the
salaries of pipeline and terminal personnel or the cost of their employee benefits, such as 401(k),
pension and health insurance benefits, which are separately charged to us by Holly. We also
reimburse Holly and its affiliates for direct expenses they incur on our behalf.
| Pipeline and terminal revenues received from Holly were
$16.4 million and $10.6 million for the three months ended
June 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively, and $30.1 million and
$23.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006,
respectively. These amounts include the revenues received
under the Holly PTA and Holly IPA. |
|
| Holly charged general and administrative services under
the Omnibus Agreement of $0.5 million for the three months
ended June 30, 2007 and 2006 and $1.0 million for the six
months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006. |
|
| We reimbursed Holly for costs of employees supporting our
operations of $2.3 million and $1.8 million for the three
months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively, and $4.6 million and $3.7 million for the six months ended June 30,
2007 and 2006, respectively. |
|
| Holly reimbursed us $24,000 and $40,000 for certain costs
paid on their behalf for the three months ended June 30, 2007
and 2006, respectively, and $98,000 and $96,000 for the six
months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively. |
|
| In the three months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, we
distributed $5.6 million and $5.0 million, respectively, to
Holly as regular distributions on its subordinated units,
common units and general partner interest. We distributed
$11.1 million and $9.8 million to Holly in the six months
ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively. |
|
| Our net accounts receivable from Holly were $3.9 million
and $3.5 million at June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006,
respectively. |
|
| Holly has failed to meet its minimum revenue commitment
for each of the first eight quarters of the Holly IPA. We
have charged Holly $4.1 million for these shortfalls to date,
$0.2 million of which is included in affiliate accounts
receivable at June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006. |
|
| For the three and six months
ended June 30, 2007, our revenues from Holly included $1.1
million and $1.6 million, respectively, of shortfalls billed under the Holly IPA in 2006 as
Holly did not exceed its minimum revenue obligation in any of the subsequent four quarters.
Deferred revenue in the consolidated balance sheets at June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006,
includes $1.5 million and $2.4 million, respectively, relating to the Holly IPA. It is possible
that Holly may not exceed its minimum obligations under the Holly IPA to allow Holly to receive
credit for any of the $1.5 million deferred at June 30, 2007. |
BP
We have a 70% ownership interest in Rio Grande and BP owns the other 30%. Due to the ownership
interest and resulting consolidation, BP is a related party to us.
| BP is the sole customer of Rio Grande. BPs agreement to
ship on the Rio Grande pipeline expired in April 2007 and was
extended for an additional year. This agreement will continue
on a year-to-year basis unless cancelled by either party prior
to the end of the previous contract year. We recorded
revenues from them of $1.8 million and $1.6 million for the
three months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively, and
$4.8 million and $4.0 million for the six months ended June
30, 2007 and 2006, respectively. |
|
| Rio Grande paid distributions to BP of $0.5 million and
$0.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2007 and
2006, respectively, and $0.5 million and $1.2 million for the
six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
|
- 14 -
Table of Contents
| Included in our accounts receivable trade at June 30,
2007 and December 31, 2006 were $0.4 million and $2.1 million,
respectively, which represented the receivable balance of Rio
Grande from BP. |
Alon
We have a 15-year pipelines and terminals agreement with Alon (the Alon PTA), expiring in 2020,
under which Alon has agreed to transport on our pipelines and throughput through our terminals
volumes of refined products that results in a minimum level of annual revenue. The agreed upon
tariffs are increased or decreased annually at a rate equal to the percentage change in PPI, but
not below the initial tariff rate. Following the March 1, 2007 PPI rate adjustment, Alons total
minimum commitment for the twelve months ending December 31, 2007 is $20.8 million.
Alon became a related party when it acquired all of our Class B subordinated units in connection
with our acquisition of assets from them on February 28, 2005.
| We recognized $6.2 million and $5.6 million of revenues
for pipeline transportation and terminalling services under
the Alon PTA and $1.8 million and $1.7 million under a
pipeline capacity lease for the three months ended June 30,
2007 and 2006, respectively. We recognized $10.7 million and
$12.4 million of revenues for pipeline transportation and
terminalling services under the Alon PTA and $3.5 million and
$3.4 million under a pipeline capacity lease for the six
months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively. The
capacity lease agreements have remaining terms from less than
a year up to three years. |
|
| We paid $0.7 million and $0.6 million to Alon for
distributions on our Class B subordinated units for the three
months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively, and $1.3
million and $1.2 million for the six months ended June 30,
2007 and 2006, respectively. |
|
| Included in our accounts receivable trade at June 30, 2007
and December 31, 2006 were $4.4 million and $5.0 million,
respectively, which represented the receivable balance from
Alon. |
|
| For the three and six months
ended June 30, 2007, our revenues from Alon included
$1.5 million of shortfalls
billed under the Alon PTA in 2006 as Alon did not exceed its
minimum revenue obligation in any of the subsequent four
quarters. Deferred revenue in the consolidated balance sheets
at June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006 includes $3.0 million
and $3.1 million, respectively, relating to the Alon PTA. It
is possible that Alon may not exceed its minimum obligations
under the Alon PTA to allow Alon to receive credit for any of
the $3.0 million deferred at June 30, 2007. |
Note 8: Partners Equity and Cash Distributions
Issuances of units
Holly currently holds 7,000,000 of our subordinated units and 70,000 of our common units, which
constitutes a 45% ownership interest in us, including the 2% general partner interest.
Hollys subordinated units have the right to receive distributions of available cash from operating
surplus in an amount equal to the minimum quarterly distribution of $0.50 per quarter, plus any
arrearages in the payment of the minimum quarterly distribution on the common units from prior
quarters, before any distributions of available cash from operating surplus may be made on the
subordinated units. The purpose of the subordinated units is to increase the likelihood that cash
is available for common unit distributions during the subordination period. The subordination
period will extend until the first day of any quarter beginning after June 30, 2009 that each of
the following tests are met: distributions of available cash from operating surplus on each of the
outstanding common units and subordinated units equaled or exceeded the minimum quarterly
distribution for each of the three consecutive, non-overlapping four-quarter periods immediately
preceding that date; the adjusted operating surplus (as defined in its partnership agreement)
generated during each of the three consecutive, non-overlapping
- 15 -
Table of Contents
four-quarter periods immediately preceding that date equaled or exceeded the sum of the minimum
quarterly distributions on all of the outstanding common units and subordinated units during those
periods on a fully diluted basis and the related distribution on the 2% general partner interest
during those periods; and there are no arrearages in payment of the minimum quarterly distribution
on the common units. If the unitholders remove the general partner without cause, the
subordination period may end before June 30, 2009. The Holly subordinated units may convert to
common units on a one-for-one basis when certain conditions are met. The partnership agreement
sets forth the calculation to be used to determine the amount and priority of cash distributions
that the common unitholders, subordinated unitholders and general partner will receive.
Under our registration statement filed with the SEC using a shelf registration process, we may
offer from time to time up to $800.0 million of our securities, through one or more prospectus
supplements that would describe, among other things, the specific amounts, prices and terms of any
securities offered and how the proceeds would be used. Any proceeds from the sale of securities
would be used for general business purposes, which may include, among other things, funding
acquisitions of assets or businesses, working capital, capital expenditures, investments in
subsidiaries, the retirement of existing debt and/or the repurchase of common units or other
securities.
Allocations of Net Income
Net income is allocated between limited partners and the general partner interest in accordance
with the provisions of the partnership agreement. Net income allocated to the general partner
includes any incentive distributions declared in the period. After the amount of incentive
distributions is allocated to the general partner, the remaining net income for the period is
generally allocated to the partners based on their weighted average ownership percentage during the
period.
Cash Distributions
We consider regular cash distributions to unitholders on a quarterly basis, although there is no
assurance as to the future cash distributions since they are dependent upon future earnings, cash
flows, capital requirements, financial condition and other factors. Our Credit Agreement prohibits
us from making cash distributions if any potential default or event of default, as defined in the
Credit Agreement, occurs or would result from the cash distribution.
Within 45 days after the end of each quarter, we will distribute all of our available cash (as
defined in our partnership agreement) to unitholders of record on the applicable record date. The
amount of available cash generally is all cash on hand at the end of the quarter; less the amount
of cash reserves established by our general partner to provide for the proper conduct of our
business, comply with applicable law, any of our debt instruments, or other agreements; or provide
funds for distributions to our unitholders and to our general partner for any one or more of the
next four quarters; plus all cash on hand on the date of determination of available cash for the
quarter resulting from working capital borrowings made after the end of the quarter. Working
capital borrowings are generally borrowings that are made under our revolving Credit Agreement and
in all cases are used solely for working capital purposes or to pay distributions to partners.
We make distributions of available cash from operating surplus for any quarter during any
subordination period in the following manner: firstly, 98% to the common unitholders, pro rata, and
2% to the general partner, until we distribute for each outstanding common unit an amount equal to
the minimum quarterly distribution for that quarter; secondly, 98% to the common unitholders, pro
rata, and 2% to the general partner, until we distribute for each outstanding common unit an amount
equal to any arrearages in payment of the minimum quarterly distribution on the common units for
any prior quarters during the subordination period; thirdly, 98% to the subordinated unitholders,
pro rata, and 2% to the general partner, until we distribute for each subordinated unit an amount
equal to the minimum quarterly distribution for that quarter; and thereafter, cash in excess of the
minimum quarterly distributions is distributed to the unitholders and the general partner based on
the percentages below.
- 16 -
Table of Contents
The general partner, HEP Logistics Holdings, L.P., is entitled to incentive distributions if the
amount we distribute with respect to any quarter exceeds specified target levels shown below:
Marginal Percentage Interest in | ||||||||||
Total Quarterly Distribution | Distributions | |||||||||
Target Amount | Unitholders | General Partner | ||||||||
Minimum Quarterly Distribution |
$0.50 | 98 | % | 2 | % | |||||
First Target Distribution |
Up to $0.55 | 98 | % | 2 | % | |||||
Second Target Distribution |
above $0.55 up to $0.625 | 85 | % | 15 | % | |||||
Third Target distribution |
above $0.625 up to $0.75 | 75 | % | 25 | % | |||||
Thereafter |
Above $0.75 | 50 | % | 50 | % |
The following table presents the allocation of our regular quarterly cash distributions to the
general and limited partners for each period in which declared.
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2007 | 2006 | 2007 | 2006 | |||||||||||||
(In thousands, except per unit data) | ||||||||||||||||
General partner interest |
$ | 227 | $ | 210 | $ | 449 | $ | 416 | ||||||||
General partner incentive distribution |
516 | 264 | 956 | 453 | ||||||||||||
Total general partner distribution |
743 | 474 | 1,405 | 869 | ||||||||||||
Limited partner distribution |
11,101 | 10,309 | 21,977 | 20,375 | ||||||||||||
Total regular quarterly cash distribution |
$ | 11,844 | $ | 10,783 | $ | 23,382 | $ | 21,244 | ||||||||
Cash distribution per unit applicable to
limited partners |
$ | 0.69 | $ | 0.64 | $ | 1.365 | $ | 1.265 | ||||||||
On July 26, 2007, we announced a cash distribution for the second quarter of 2007 of $0.705
per unit. The distribution is payable on all common, subordinated, and general partner units and
will be paid August 14, 2007 to all unitholders of record on August 6, 2007. The aggregate amount
of the distribution will be $12.2 million, including $0.6 million paid to the general partner as an
incentive distribution.
As a master limited partnership, we distribute our available cash, which exceeds our net income
because depreciation and amortization expense represents a non-cash charge against income. The
result is a decline in partners equity since our regular quarterly distributions exceed our
quarterly net income.
Note 9: Supplemental Guarantor/Non-Guarantor Financial Information
Obligations of Holly Energy Partners, L.P. (Parent) under the 6.25% Senior Notes have been
jointly and severally guaranteed by each of its direct and indirect wholly-owned subsidiaries
(Guarantor Subsidiaries). These guarantees are full and unconditional. Rio Grande
(Non-Guarantor), in which we have a 70% ownership interest, is the only subsidiary, which has not
guaranteed these obligations.
The following financial information presents condensed consolidating balance sheets, statements of
income, and statements of cash flows of the Parent, the Guarantor Subsidiaries and the
Non-Guarantor. The information has been presented as if the Parent accounted for its ownership in
the Guarantor Subsidiaries, and the Guarantor Subsidiaries accounted for the ownership of the
Non-Guarantor, using the equity method of accounting.
- 17 -
Table of Contents
Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet | ||||||||||||||||||||
Guarantor | Non- | |||||||||||||||||||
June 30, 2007 | Parent | Subsidiaries | Guarantor | Eliminations | Consolidated | |||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||||||||||||||
Current assets: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 2 | $ | 7,099 | $ | 4,462 | $ | | $ | 11,563 | ||||||||||
Accounts receivable |
| 8,054 | 412 | | 8,466 | |||||||||||||||
Intercompany accounts receivable (payable) |
(109,671 | ) | 109,878 | (207 | ) | | | |||||||||||||
Prepaid and other current assets |
6 | 932 | | | 938 | |||||||||||||||
Total current assets |
(109,663 | ) | 125,963 | 4,667 | | 20,967 | ||||||||||||||
Properties and equipment, net |
| 124,098 | 32,573 | | 156,671 | |||||||||||||||
Investment in subsidiaries |
324,956 | 25,675 | | (350,631 | ) | | ||||||||||||||
Transportation agreements, net |
| 55,272 | | | 55,272 | |||||||||||||||
Other assets |
1,378 | 901 | | | 2,279 | |||||||||||||||
Total assets |
$ | 216,671 | $ | 331,909 | $ | 37,240 | $ | (350,631 | ) | $ | 235,189 | |||||||||
LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS EQUITY |
||||||||||||||||||||
Current liabilities: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Accounts payable |
$ | | $ | 1,480 | $ | 392 | $ | | $ | 1,872 | ||||||||||
Accrued interest |
2,930 | 2 | | | 2,932 | |||||||||||||||
Deferred revenue |
| 4,495 | | | 4,495 | |||||||||||||||
Accrued property taxes |
| 527 | 87 | | 614 | |||||||||||||||
Other current liabilities |
516 | 122 | 83 | | 721 | |||||||||||||||
Total current liabilities |
3,446 | 6,626 | 562 | | 10,634 | |||||||||||||||
Long-term debt |
181,443 | | | | 181,443 | |||||||||||||||
Other long-term liabilities |
643 | 327 | | | 970 | |||||||||||||||
Minority interest |
| | | 11,003 | 11,003 | |||||||||||||||
Partners equity |
31,139 | 324,956 | 36,678 | (361,634 | ) | 31,139 | ||||||||||||||
Total liabilities and partners equity |
$ | 216,671 | $ | 331,909 | $ | 37,240 | $ | (350,631 | ) | $ | 235,189 | |||||||||
Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet | ||||||||||||||||||||
Guarantor | Non- | |||||||||||||||||||
December 31, 2006 | Parent | Subsidiaries | Guarantor | Eliminations | Consolidated | |||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||||||||||||||
Current assets: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 2 | $ | 9,819 | $ | 1,734 | $ | | $ | 11,555 | ||||||||||
Accounts receivable |
| 8,772 | 2,085 | | 10,857 | |||||||||||||||
Intercompany accounts receivable (payable) |
(78,952 | ) | 79,144 | (192 | ) | | | |||||||||||||
Prepaid and other current assets |
203 | 1,009 | | | 1,212 | |||||||||||||||
Total current assets |
(78,747 | ) | 98,744 | 3,627 | | 23,624 | ||||||||||||||
Properties and equipment, net |
| 127,357 | 33,127 | | 160,484 | |||||||||||||||
Investment in subsidiaries |
298,872 | 25,581 | | (324,453 | ) | | ||||||||||||||
Transportation agreements, net |
| 56,271 | 550 | | 56,821 | |||||||||||||||
Other assets |
1,453 | 1,191 | | | 2,644 | |||||||||||||||
Total assets |
$ | 221,578 | $ | 309,144 | $ | 37,304 | $ | (324,453 | ) | $ | 243,573 | |||||||||
LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS EQUITY |
||||||||||||||||||||
Current liabilities: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Accounts payable |
$ | | $ | 3,356 | $ | 425 | $ | | $ | 3,781 | ||||||||||
Accrued interest |
2,941 | | | | 2,941 | |||||||||||||||
Deferred revenue |
| 5,486 | | | 5,486 | |||||||||||||||
Accrued property taxes |
| 726 | 142 | | 868 | |||||||||||||||
Other current liabilities |
516 | 389 | 193 | | 1,098 | |||||||||||||||
Total current liabilities |
3,457 | 9,957 | 760 | | 14,174 | |||||||||||||||
Long-term debt |
180,660 | | | | 180,660 | |||||||||||||||
Other long-term liabilities |
1,235 | 315 | | | 1,550 | |||||||||||||||
Minority interest |
| | | 10,963 | 10,963 | |||||||||||||||
Partners equity |
36,226 | 298,872 | 36,544 | (335,416 | ) | 36,226 | ||||||||||||||
Total liabilities and partners equity |
$ | 221,578 | $ | 309,144 | $ | 37,304 | $ | (324,453 | ) | $ | 243,573 | |||||||||
- 18 -
Table of Contents
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Income | ||||||||||||||||||||
Guarantor | Non- | |||||||||||||||||||
Three months ended June 30, 2007 | Parent | Subsidiaries | Guarantor | Eliminations | Consolidated | |||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Revenues: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Affiliates |
$ | | $ | 16,353 | $ | | $ | | $ | 16,353 | ||||||||||
Third parties |
| 9,258 | 1,820 | (300 | ) | 10,778 | ||||||||||||||
| 25,611 | 1,820 | (300 | ) | 27,131 | |||||||||||||||
Operating costs and expenses: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Operations |
| 7,601 | 962 | (300 | ) | 8,263 | ||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
| 2,851 | 357 | | 3,208 | |||||||||||||||
General and administrative |
739 | 515 | 21 | | 1,275 | |||||||||||||||
739 | 10,967 | 1,340 | (300 | ) | 12,746 | |||||||||||||||
Operating income (loss) |
(739 | ) | 14,644 | 480 | | 14,385 | ||||||||||||||
Equity in earnings of subsidiaries |
14,820 | 356 | | (15,176 | ) | | ||||||||||||||
Interest income (expense) |
(3,075 | ) | (181 | ) | 30 | | (3,226 | ) | ||||||||||||
Gain on sale of assets |
| 1 | | | 1 | |||||||||||||||
Minority interest |
| | | (154 | ) | (154 | ) | |||||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 11,006 | $ | 14,820 | $ | 510 | $ | (15,330 | ) | $ | 11,006 | |||||||||
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Income | ||||||||||||||||||||
Guarantor | Non- | |||||||||||||||||||
Three months ended June 30, 2006 | Parent | Subsidiaries | Guarantor | Eliminations | Consolidated | |||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Revenues: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Affiliates |
$ | | $ | 10,584 | $ | | $ | | $ | 10,584 | ||||||||||
Third parties |
| 6,607 | 1,637 | (301 | ) | 7,943 | ||||||||||||||
| 17,191 | 1,637 | (301 | ) | 18,527 | |||||||||||||||
Operating costs and expenses: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Operations |
| 7,006 | 724 | (301 | ) | 7,429 | ||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
| 2,934 | 847 | | 3,781 | |||||||||||||||
General and administrative |
777 | 510 | 2 | | 1,289 | |||||||||||||||
777 | 10,450 | 1,573 | (301 | ) | 12,499 | |||||||||||||||
Operating income (loss) |
(777 | ) | 6,741 | 64 | | 6,028 | ||||||||||||||
Equity in earnings of subsidiaries |
6,788 | 65 | | (6,853 | ) | | ||||||||||||||
Interest income (expense) |
(3,013 | ) | (18 | ) | 29 | | (3,002 | ) | ||||||||||||
Minority interest |
| | | (28 | ) | (28 | ) | |||||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 2,998 | $ | 6,788 | $ | 93 | $ | (6,881 | ) | $ | 2,998 | |||||||||
- 19 -
Table of Contents
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Income | ||||||||||||||||||||
Guarantor | Non- | |||||||||||||||||||
Six months ended June 30, 2007 | Parent | Subsidiaries | Guarantor | Eliminations | Consolidated | |||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Revenues: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Affiliates |
$ | | $ | 30,115 | $ | | $ | | $ | 30,115 | ||||||||||
Third parties |
| 16,635 | 4,846 | (593 | ) | 20,888 | ||||||||||||||
| 46,750 | 4,846 | (593 | ) | 51,003 | |||||||||||||||
Operating costs and expenses: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Operations |
| 14,878 | 1,755 | (593 | ) | 16,040 | ||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
| 6,074 | 1,205 | | 7,279 | |||||||||||||||
General and administrative |
1,505 | 1,035 | 22 | | 2,562 | |||||||||||||||
1,505 | 21,987 | 2,982 | (593 | ) | 25,881 | |||||||||||||||
Operating income (loss) |
(1,505 | ) | 24,763 | 1,864 | | 25,122 | ||||||||||||||
Equity in earnings of subsidiaries |
26,084 | 1,353 | | (27,437 | ) | | ||||||||||||||
Interest income (expense) |
(6,139 | ) | (330 | ) | 70 | | (6,399 | ) | ||||||||||||
Gain on sale of assets |
| 298 | | | 298 | |||||||||||||||
Minority interest |
| | | (581 | ) | (581 | ) | |||||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 18,440 | $ | 26,084 | $ | 1,934 | $ | (28,018 | ) | $ | 18,440 | |||||||||
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Income | ||||||||||||||||||||
Guarantor | Non- | |||||||||||||||||||
Six months ended June 30, 2006 | Parent | Subsidiaries | Guarantor | Eliminations | Consolidated | |||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Revenues: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Affiliates |
$ | | $ | 23,066 | $ | | $ | | $ | 23,066 | ||||||||||
Third parties |
| 14,488 | 4,006 | (595 | ) | 17,899 | ||||||||||||||
| 37,554 | 4,006 | (595 | ) | 40,965 | |||||||||||||||
Operating costs and expenses: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Operations |
| 13,676 | 1,457 | (595 | ) | 14,538 | ||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
| 5,883 | 1,691 | | 7,574 | |||||||||||||||
General and administrative |
1,489 | 1,021 | 3 | | 2,513 | |||||||||||||||
1,489 | 20,580 | 3,151 | (595 | ) | 24,625 | |||||||||||||||
Operating income (loss) |
(1,489 | ) | 16,974 | 855 | | 16,340 | ||||||||||||||
Equity in earnings of subsidiaries |
17,577 | 637 | | (18,214 | ) | | ||||||||||||||
Interest income (expense) |
(5,955 | ) | (34 | ) | 55 | | (5,934 | ) | ||||||||||||
Minority interest |
| | | (273 | ) | (273 | ) | |||||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 10,133 | $ | 17,577 | $ | 910 | $ | (18,487 | ) | $ | 10,133 | |||||||||
- 20 -
Table of Contents
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows | ||||||||||||||||||||
Guarantor | Non- | |||||||||||||||||||
Six months ended June 30, 2007 | Parent | Subsidiaries | Guarantor | Eliminations | Consolidated | |||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Cash flows from operating activities |
$ | 24,290 | $ | (1,196 | ) | $ | 4,628 | $ | (1,260 | ) | $ | 26,462 | ||||||||
Cash flows from investing activities |
||||||||||||||||||||
Additions to properties and equipment |
| (1,833 | ) | (100 | ) | | (1,933 | ) | ||||||||||||
Proceeds from sale of assets |
| 325 | | | 325 | |||||||||||||||
| (1,508 | ) | (100 | ) | | (1,608 | ) | |||||||||||||
Cash flows from financing activities |
||||||||||||||||||||
Distributions to partners |
(23,382 | ) | | (1,800 | ) | 1,800 | (23,382 | ) | ||||||||||||
Cash distribution to minority interest |
| | | (540 | ) | (540 | ) | |||||||||||||
Purchase of units for restricted grants |
(908 | ) | | | | (908 | ) | |||||||||||||
Other |
| (16 | ) | | | (16 | ) | |||||||||||||
(24,290 | ) | (16 | ) | (1,800 | ) | 1,260 | (24,846 | ) | ||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
||||||||||||||||||||
Increase (decrease) for the period |
| (2,720 | ) | 2,728 | | 8 | ||||||||||||||
Beginning of period |
2 | 9,819 | 1,734 | | 11,555 | |||||||||||||||
End of period |
$ | 2 | $ | 7,099 | $ | 4,462 | $ | | $ | 11,563 | ||||||||||
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows | ||||||||||||||||||||
Guarantor | Non- | |||||||||||||||||||
Six months ended June 30, 2006 | Parent | Subsidiaries | Guarantor | Eliminations | Consolidated | |||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Cash flows from operating activities |
$ | 21,756 | $ | 670 | $ | 2,860 | $ | (2,800 | ) | $ | 22,486 | |||||||||
Cash flows from investing activities additions to
properties and equipment |
| (3,543 | ) | (156 | ) | | (3,699 | ) | ||||||||||||
Cash flows from financing activities |
||||||||||||||||||||
Distributions to partners |
(21,244 | ) | | (4,000 | ) | 4,000 | (21,244 | ) | ||||||||||||
Cash distribution to minority interest |
| | | (1,200 | ) | (1,200 | ) | |||||||||||||
Purchase of
units for restricted grants |
(512 | ) | | | | (512 | ) | |||||||||||||
(21,756 | ) | | (4,000 | ) | 2,800 | (22,956 | ) | |||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
||||||||||||||||||||
Decrease for the period |
| (2,873 | ) | (1,296 | ) | | (4,169 | ) | ||||||||||||
Beginning of period |
2 | 17,770 | 2,811 | | 20,583 | |||||||||||||||
End of period |
$ | 2 | $ | 14,897 | $ | 1,515 | $ | | $ | 16,414 | ||||||||||
Note 10: Proposed Joint Ventures
In February 2007, the HLS board of directors authorized a letter of intent with Plains All American
Pipeline, L.P. (Plains) for HEP to acquire a 25% joint venture interest in a new 95-mile
intrastate pipeline system, now being constructed by Plains, for the shipment of up to 120,000 bpd
of crude oil into the Salt Lake City area. The pipeline would be owned by a new joint venture
company which would be owned 75% by Plains and 25% by HEP. Subject to the actual construction
cost, HEP would purchase its interest for between $22.0 and $25.5 million in the first quarter of
2008, when the new pipeline system is expected to become fully operational.
As
previously announced, Holly has entered into a Memorandum of Understanding with Sinclair Transportation
Company (Sinclair) to jointly build a 12-inch pipeline from Salt Lake City, Utah to Las Vegas,
Nevada, together with terminal facilities in the Cedar City, Utah and north Las Vegas areas (the
UNEV Pipeline).
- 21 -
Table of Contents
Subject to the execution of definitive agreements, Holly will own a 75% interest and Sinclair will
own a 25% interest in the project. We have an understanding with
Holly that we will be the operator and will have an option to
purchase Hollys interest in the project, effective for a 180-day period commencing when the UNEV
Pipeline becomes operational, at a purchase price equal to Hollys share of actual costs, plus
interest at 7% per annum. The initial capacity of the pipeline will be approximately 62,000 bpd,
with the capacity for further expansion to approximately 120,000 bpd. The cost of the pipeline is
expected to be approximately $235.0 million, and the total cost of the project including terminals
is expected to be approximately $300.0 million. Certain preliminary work has already been carried
out on this project by Holly. Construction of this project is currently expected to be completed
by the end of 2008.
- 22 -
Table of Contents
HOLLY ENERGY PARTNERS, L.P.
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
This Item 2, including but not limited to the sections on Results of Operations and Liquidity
and Capital Resources, contains forward-looking statements. See Forward-Looking Statements at
the beginning of Part I.
OVERVIEW
Holly Energy Partners, L.P. (HEP) is a Delaware limited partnership. We own and operate
substantially all of the refined product pipeline and terminalling assets that support the Holly
Corporation (Holly) refining and marketing operations in west Texas, New Mexico, Utah, Idaho and
Arizona and a 70% interest in Rio Grande Pipeline Company (Rio Grande). HEP is currently 45%
owned by Holly.
We operate a system of petroleum product pipelines in Texas, New Mexico and Oklahoma, and
distribution terminals in Texas, New Mexico, Arizona, Utah, Idaho, and Washington. We generate
revenues by charging tariffs for transporting petroleum products through our pipelines and by
charging fees for terminalling refined products and other hydrocarbons, and storing and providing
other services at our terminals. We do not take ownership of products that we transport or
terminal; therefore, we are not directly exposed to changes in commodity prices.
Our revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2007 were $51.0 million and our net income for the
six months ended June 30, 2007 was $18.4 million. Our revenues and net income for the six months
ended June 30, 2006 were $41.0 million and $10.1 million, respectively. Our total operating costs
and expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2007 were $25.9 million, as compared to $24.6
million for the six months ended June 30, 2006.
Agreements with Holly Corporation
We serve Hollys refineries in New Mexico and Utah under two 15-year pipeline and terminal
agreements. One of these agreements relates to the pipelines and terminals contributed by Holly to
us at the time of our initial public offering and expires in 2019 (Holly PTA). Our other
agreement with Holly relates to the Intermediate Pipelines acquired from Holly in July 2005 and
expires in 2020 (Holly IPA). The substantial majority of our business is devoted to providing
transportation and terminalling services to Holly. Following the July 1, 2007 rate adjustment for
the increased producer price index (PPI), the volume commitments by Holly under the Holly PTA
will produce at least $39.6 million of revenue for the twelve months ending June 30, 2008. Under
the Holly IPA, Holly agreed to transport volumes of intermediate products on the intermediate
pipelines that following the July 1, 2007 PPI adjustment will result in minimum funds to us of
$12.8 million for the twelve months ended June 30, 2008. If Holly fails to meet its minimum
revenue commitments in any quarter, it will be required to pay us in cash the amount of any
shortfall by the last day of the month following the end of the quarter. A shortfall payment may
be applied as a credit in the following four quarters after Hollys minimum obligations are met.
Under certain provisions of an omnibus agreement that we entered with Holly in July 2004 and
expires in 2019 (the Omnibus Agreement), we pay Holly an annual administrative fee, initially
$2.0 million for each of the three years following the closing of our initial public offering, for
the provision by Holly or its affiliates of various general and administrative services to us.
Effective July 1, 2007, the annual fee increased to $2.3 million in accordance with provisions
under the agreement. This fee does not include the salaries of pipeline and terminal personnel or
the cost of their employee benefits, such as 401(k), pension and health insurance benefits, which
are separately charged to us by Holly. We also reimburse Holly and its affiliates for direct
expenses they incur on our behalf.
- 23 -
Table of Contents
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (Unaudited)
Income, Distributable Cash Flow and Volumes
The following tables present income, distributable cash flow and volume information for the three
and six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006.
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2007 | 2006 | 2007 | 2006 | |||||||||||||
(In thousands, except per unit data) | ||||||||||||||||
Revenues |
||||||||||||||||
Pipelines: |
||||||||||||||||
Affiliates refined product pipelines |
$ | 9,438 | $ | 6,374 | $ | 17,677 | $ | 13,697 | ||||||||
Affiliates intermediate pipelines |
4,054 | 1,841 | 7,063 | 4,314 | ||||||||||||
Third parties |
9,355 | 6,821 | 18,145 | 15,598 | ||||||||||||
22,847 | 15,036 | 42,885 | 33,609 | |||||||||||||
Terminals and truck loading racks: |
||||||||||||||||
Affiliates |
2,861 | 2,369 | 5,403 | 5,055 | ||||||||||||
Third parties |
1,423 | 1,122 | 2,715 | 2,301 | ||||||||||||
4,284 | 3,491 | 8,118 | 7,356 | |||||||||||||
Total revenues |
27,131 | 18,527 | 51,003 | 40,965 | ||||||||||||
Operating costs and expenses |
||||||||||||||||
Operations |
8,263 | 7,429 | 16,040 | 14,538 | ||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
3,208 | 3,781 | 7,279 | 7,574 | ||||||||||||
General and administrative |
1,275 | 1,289 | 2,562 | 2,513 | ||||||||||||
12,746 | 12,499 | 25,881 | 24,625 | |||||||||||||
Operating income |
14,385 | 6,028 | 25,122 | 16,340 | ||||||||||||
Interest income |
145 | 245 | 330 | 488 | ||||||||||||
Interest expense, including amortization |
(3,371 | ) | (3,247 | ) | (6,729 | ) | (6,422 | ) | ||||||||
Gain on sale of assets |
1 | | 298 | | ||||||||||||
Minority interest in Rio Grande |
(154 | ) | (28 | ) | (581 | ) | (273 | ) | ||||||||
Net income |
11,006 | 2,998 | 18,440 | 10,133 | ||||||||||||
Less general partner interest in net
income, including incentive distributions
(1) |
726 | 319 | 1,306 | 646 | ||||||||||||
Limited partners interest in net income |
$ | 10,280 | $ | 2,679 | $ | 17,134 | $ | 9,487 | ||||||||
Net income per limited partner unit -
basic and diluted (1) |
$ | 0.64 | $ | 0.17 | $ | 1.06 | $ | 0.59 | ||||||||
Weighted average limited partners units
outstanding |
16,108 | 16,108 | 16,108 | 16,108 | ||||||||||||
EBITDA (2) |
$ | 17,440 | $ | 9,781 | $ | 32,118 | $ | 23,641 | ||||||||
Distributable cash flow (3) |
$ | 12,389 | $ | 10,293 | $ | 24,983 | $ | 21,507 | ||||||||
Volumes (bpd) |
||||||||||||||||
Pipelines: |
||||||||||||||||
Affiliates refined product pipelines |
82,571 | 55,793 | 77,494 | 61,151 | ||||||||||||
Affiliates intermediate pipelines |
68,437 | 44,955 | 63,980 | 52,959 | ||||||||||||
Third parties |
64,487 | 52,134 | 64,835 | 64,666 | ||||||||||||
215,495 | 152,882 | 206,309 | 178,776 | |||||||||||||
Terminals and truck loading racks: |
||||||||||||||||
Affiliates |
123,245 | 107,302 | 121,724 | 113,202 | ||||||||||||
Third parties |
53,179 | 41,266 | 50,030 | 44,145 | ||||||||||||
176,424 | 148,568 | 171,754 | 157,347 | |||||||||||||
Total for pipelines and terminal assets (bpd) |
391,919 | 301,450 | 378,063 | 336,123 | ||||||||||||
- 24 -
Table of Contents
(1) | Net income is allocated between limited partners and the general partner interest in
accordance with the provisions of the partnership agreement. Net income allocated to the
general partner includes any incentive distributions declared in the period. Incentive
distributions of $0.5 million and $0.3 million were declared during the three months ended
June 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively, and $1.0 million and $0.5 million during the six
months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively. The net income applicable to the
limited partners is divided by the weighted average limited partner units outstanding in
computing the net income per unit applicable to limited partners. |
|
(2) | Earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA) is calculated
as net income plus (i) interest expense net of interest income and (ii) depreciation and
amortization. EBITDA is not a calculation based upon U.S. generally accepted accounting
principles (U.S. GAAP). However, the amounts included in the EBITDA calculation are
derived from amounts included in our consolidated financial statements. EBITDA should not
be considered as an alternative to net income or operating income, as an indication of our
operating performance or as an alternative to operating cash flow as a measure of
liquidity. EBITDA is not necessarily comparable to similarly titled measures of other
companies. EBITDA is presented here because it is a widely used financial indicator used
by investors and analysts to measure performance. EBITDA is also used by our management
for internal analysis and as a basis for compliance with financial covenants. |
|
Set forth below is our calculation of EBITDA. |
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2007 | 2006 | 2007 | 2006 | |||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 11,006 | $ | 2,998 | $ | 18,440 | $ | 10,133 | ||||||||
Add interest expense |
3,067 | 3,005 | 6,122 | 5,938 | ||||||||||||
Add amortization of discount and
deferred debt issuance costs |
304 | 242 | 607 | 484 | ||||||||||||
Subtract interest income |
(145 | ) | (245 | ) | (330 | ) | (488 | ) | ||||||||
Add depreciation and
amortization |
3,208 | 3,781 | 7,279 | 7,574 | ||||||||||||
EBITDA |
$ | 17,440 | $ | 9,781 | $ | 32,118 | $ | 23,641 | ||||||||
(3) | Distributable cash flow is not a calculation based upon U.S. GAAP. However, the
amounts included in the calculation are derived from amounts separately presented in our
consolidated financial statements, with the exception of maintenance capital expenditures.
Distributable cash flow should not be considered in isolation or as an alternative to net
income or operating income, as an indication of our operating performance or as an
alternative to operating cash flow as a measure of liquidity. Distributable cash flow is
not necessarily comparable to similarly titled measures of other companies. Distributable
cash flow is presented here because it is a widely accepted financial indicator used by
investors to compare partnership performance. We believe that this measure provides
investors an enhanced perspective of the operating performance of our assets and the cash
our business is generating. |
- 25 -
Table of Contents
Set forth below is our calculation of distributable cash flow. |
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2007 | 2006 | 2007 | 2006 | |||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 11,006 | $ | 2,998 | $ | 18,440 | $ | 10,133 | ||||||||
Add
depreciation and
amortization |
3,208 | 3,781 | 7,279 | 7,574 | ||||||||||||
Add amortization of discount and
deferred debt issuance costs |
304 | 242 | 607 | 484 | ||||||||||||
Add
(subtract) increase
(decrease) in
deferred revenue |
(1,896 | ) | 3,432 | (990 | ) | 3,916 | ||||||||||
Subtract
maintenance capital
expenditures* |
(233 | ) | (160 | ) | (353 | ) | (600 | ) | ||||||||
Distributable cash flow |
$ | 12,389 | $ | 10,293 | $ | 24,983 | $ | 21,507 | ||||||||
* | Maintenance capital expenditures are capital expenditures made to replace partially
or fully depreciated assets in order to maintain the existing operating capacity of our
assets and to extend their useful lives. |
June 30, | December 31, | |||||||
2007 | 2006 | |||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Balance Sheet Data |
||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 11,563 | $ | 11,555 | ||||
Working capital |
$ | 10,333 | $ | 9,450 | ||||
Total assets |
$ | 235,189 | $ | 243,573 | ||||
Long-term debt |
$ | 181,443 | $ | 180,660 | ||||
Partners equity |
$ | 31,139 | $ | 36,226 |
As a master limited partnership, we distribute our available cash, which exceeds our net
income because depreciation and amortization expense represents a non-cash charge against income.
The result is a decline in partners equity since our regular quarterly distributions exceed our
quarterly net income.
Results of Operations Three Months Ended June 30, 2007 Compared with Three Months Ended June 30,
2006
Summary
Net income increased by $8.0 million from $3.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2006 to
$11.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2007. The increase in overall earnings was
principally due to an increase in volumes transported on our pipeline systems, the effects of
annual tariff increases on our pipelines and the recognition of certain previously deferred
revenue, offset by an increase in our operating costs and expenses. Approximately $0.7 million of
revenue relating to deficiency payments associated with certain guaranteed shipping contracts was
deferred during the three months ended June 30, 2007. Such revenue will be recognized in future
periods either as payment for shipments in excess of guaranteed levels or when shipping rights
expire unused after a twelve-month period.
Revenues
Revenues increased by $8.6 million from $18.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2006 to
$27.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2007. The increase in revenue was principally
due to an increase in volumes transported on our pipeline systems, the effects of annual tariff
increases on our pipelines and the realization of $2.6 million of certain previously deferred
revenue.
- 26 -
Table of Contents
The large increase in revenues and net income for the three months ended June 30, 2007 as compared
to the same period in 2006 is principally due to significant downtime at all of the refineries
served by our product distribution network in the second quarter of 2006. These refineries,
including Hollys Navajo and Woods Cross refineries and Alons Big Spring refinery, were required
to produce ultra low sulfur diesel fuel (ULSD) by June 2006. To meet this requirement, downtime
at the refineries was required so that ULSD-associated projects could be brought on line.
Additionally, in the second quarter of 2006, Holly completed an expansion of the Navajo refinery.
The tie-in of these new projects coming on line, combined with other refinery maintenance, much of
which was timed in conjunction with the capital projects, resulted in reduced refinery production,
which was the principal factor contributing to a significant volume decrease during the second
quarter of 2006. Since the expansion of Hollys Navajo refinery in mid-year 2006, increased
production has contributed to increased volume shipments on our pipeline systems.
Revenues from the refined product pipelines increased by $5.6 million from $13.2 million for the
three months ended June 30, 2006 to $18.8 million for the three months ended June 30, 2007. This
increase in refined product pipeline revenue is principally due to an increase in the volumes
shipped on our refined product pipeline systems, the effect of the annual tariff increase on
refined product shipments and the realization of $1.5 million of previously deferred revenue as the
contractual period had expired to provide certain pipeline services that had previously been paid
for. Shipments on our refined product pipelines increased to an average of 147.1 thousand barrels
per day (mbpd) for the three months ended June 30, 2007 as compared to 107.9 mbpd for the three
months ended June 30, 2006.
Revenues from the intermediate product pipelines increased by $2.2 million from $1.8 million for
the three months ended June 30, 2006 to $4.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2007. This
increase in intermediate pipeline revenue is principally due to an increase in volumes shipped on
our intermediate pipelines, the effect of the annual increase in the intermediate pipeline tariff
and the realization of $1.1 million of previously deferred revenue as the contractual period had
expired to provide certain pipeline services that had previously been paid for. Shipments on our
intermediate product pipelines increased to an average of 68.4 mbpd for the three months ended June
30, 2007 as compared to 45.0 mbpd for the three months ended June 30, 2006.
Revenues from terminal and truck loading rack service fees increased by $0.8 million from $3.5
million for the three months ended June 30, 2006 to $4.3 million for the three months ended June
30, 2007. Refined products terminalled in our facilities increased to an average of 176.4 mbpd for
the three months ended June 30, 2007 as compared to 148.6 mbpd for the three months ended June 30,
2006.
Operating Costs
Operations expense increased by $0.8 million from the three months ended June 30, 2006 to the three
months ended June 30, 2007. This increase in expense was principally due to an increase in
pipeline and terminal maintenance expense and an increase in the cost of employees who perform
services for us, including the addition of two new senior level executives.
Depreciation and Amortization
Depreciation and amortization decreased by $0.6 million from the three months ended June 30, 2006
to the three months ended June 30, 2007, principally due to a reduction in amortization expense as
a transportation agreement became fully amortized in April 2007.
General and Administrative
General and administrative costs of $1.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2007 were
relatively flat as compared to the three months ended June 30, 2006.
Interest Expense
Interest expense for the three months ended June 30, 2007 totaled $3.4 million, an increase of $0.2
million from $3.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2006. For the three months ended
June 30,
- 27 -
Table of Contents
2007, interest expense consisted of: $3.0 million of interest on our outstanding debt, net of the
impact of the interest rate swap; $0.1 million of commitment fees on the unused portion of the
credit facility; and $0.3 million of amortization of the discount on the senior notes and deferred
debt issuance costs. For the three months ended June 30, 2006, interest expense consisted of:
$2.9 million of interest on our outstanding debt, net of the impact of the interest rate swap; $0.1
million of commitment fees on the unused portion of the credit facility; and $0.2 million of
amortization of the discount on the senior notes and deferred debt issuance costs.
Minority Interest in Earnings of Rio Grande
The minority interest related to the 30% of Rio Grande that we do not own reduced our income by
$0.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2007 as compared to $28,000 for the three months
ended June 30, 2006.
Results of Operations Six Months Ended June 30, 2007 Compared with Six Months Ended June 30, 2006
Summary
Net income increased by $8.3 million from $10.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006 to
$18.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2007. The increase in overall earnings was
principally due to an increase in volumes transported on our pipeline systems, the effects of
annual tariff increases on our pipelines and the recognition of certain previously deferred
revenue, offset by an increase in our operating costs and expenses. Approximately $2.1 million of
revenue relating to deficiency payments associated with certain guaranteed shipping contracts was
deferred during the six months ended June 30, 2007. Such revenue will be recognized in future
periods either as payment for shipments in excess of guaranteed levels or when shipping rights
expire unused after a twelve-month period.
Revenues
Revenues increased by $10.0 million from $41.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006 to
$51.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2007. This increase resulted principally from an
increase in volumes transported on our pipeline systems, the effect of annual tariff increases on
our pipelines systems and the realization of $3.1 million of certain previously deferred revenue.
The large increase in revenues and net income for the six months ended June 30, 2007 as compared to
the same period in 2006 is principally due to significant downtime at all of the refineries served
by our product distribution network in the second quarter of 2006. These refineries, including
Hollys Navajo and Woods Cross refineries and Alons Big Spring refinery, were required to produce
ULSD fuel by June 2006. To meet this requirement, downtime at the refineries was required so that
ULSD-associated projects could be brought on line. Additionally, Holly completed an expansion of
the Navajo refinery. The tie-in of these new projects coming on line, combined with other refinery
maintenance, much of which was timed in conjunction with the capital projects, resulted in reduced
refinery production, which was the principal factor contributing to a significant volume decrease
during the second quarter of 2006. Since the expansion of Hollys Navajo refinery in mid-year
2006, increased production has contributed to increased volume shipments on our pipeline systems.
Revenues from the refined product pipelines increased by $6.5 million from $29.3 million for the
six months ended June 30, 2006 to $35.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2007. This
increase in refined product pipeline revenue is principally due to an increase in volumes shipped
on our refined product pipelines, the effect of the annual tariff increase on refined product
shipments, and the realization of $1.5 million of previously deferred revenue as the contractual
period had expired to provide certain pipeline services that had previously been paid for.
Shipments on our refined product pipelines increased to an average of 142.3 mbpd for the six months
ended June 30, 2007 as compared to 125.8 mbpd for the six months ended June 30, 2006.
Revenues from the intermediate product pipelines increased by $2.8 million from $4.3 million for
the six months ended June 30, 2006 to $7.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2007. This
increase in
- 28 -
Table of Contents
intermediate pipeline revenue is principally due to an increase in volumes shipped on our
intermediate pipelines, the effect of the annual increase in the intermediate pipeline tariff and
the realization of $1.6 million of previously deferred revenue as the contractual period had
expired to provide certain pipeline services that had previously been paid for. Shipments on our
intermediate product pipelines increased to an average of 64.0 mbpd for the six months ended June
30, 2007 as compared to 53.0 mbpd for the six months ended June 30, 2006.
Revenues from terminal and truck loading rack service fees increased by $0.7 million from $7.4
million for the six months ended June 30, 2006 to $8.1 million for the six months ended June 30,
2007. Refined products terminalled in our facilities increased to an average of 171.8 mbpd for the
six months ended June 30, 2007 as compared to 157.3 mbpd for the six months ended June 30, 2006.
Operating Costs
Operations expense increased by $1.5 million from the six months ended June 30, 2006 to the six
months ended June 30, 2007. This increase in expense was principally due to an increase in
pipeline and terminal maintenance expense and an increase in the cost of employees who perform
services for us, including the addition of two new senior level executives.
Depreciation and Amortization
Depreciation and amortization decreased by $0.3 million from the six months ended June 30, 2006 to
the six months ended June 30, 2007, due principally to a reduction in amortization expense, as a
transportation agreement became fully amortized in April 2007, partially offset by depreciation and
amortization on fixed asset additions.
General and Administrative
General and administrative costs increased by less than $0.1 million from the six months ended June
30, 2006 to the six months ended June 30, 2007.
Interest Expense
Interest expense for the six months ended June 30, 2007 totaled $6.7 million, an increase of $0.3
million from $6.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006. For the six months ended June
30, 2007, interest expense consisted of: $5.9 million of interest on our outstanding debt, net of
the impact of the interest rate swap; $0.2 million of commitment fees on the unused portion of the
credit facility; and $0.6 million of amortization of the discount on the senior notes and deferred
debt issuance costs. For the six months ended June 30, 2006, interest expense consisted of: $5.7
million of interest on our outstanding debt, net of the impact of the interest rate swap; $0.2
million of commitment fees on the unused portion of the credit facility; and $0.5 million of
amortization of the discount on the senior notes and deferred debt issuance costs.
Minority Interest in Earnings of Rio Grande
The minority interest related to the 30% of Rio Grande that we do not own reduced our income by
$0.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2007 as compared to $0.3 million for the six months
ended June 30, 2006.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Overview
We have a four-year, $100.0 million senior secured revolving credit agreement (the Credit
Agreement) expiring in July 2008. The Credit Agreement is available to fund capital expenditures,
acquisitions, and working capital and for general partnership purposes. As of June 30, 2007, we
had no amounts outstanding under the Credit Agreement.
- 29 -
Table of Contents
Our senior notes maturing March 1, 2015 are registered with the SEC and bear interest at 6.25%
(Senior Notes). The Senior Notes are unsecured and impose certain restrictive covenants,
including limitations on our ability to incur additional indebtedness, make investments, sell
assets, incur certain liens, pay distributions, enter into transactions with affiliates, and enter
into mergers. At any time when the Senior Notes are rated investment grade by both Moodys and
Standard & Poors and no default or event of default exists, we will not be subject to many of the
foregoing covenants. Additionally, we have certain redemption rights under the Senior Notes.
Under our shelf registration statement, filed September 2, 2005, we may offer from time to time
up to $800.0 million of our securities, through one or more prospectus supplements that would
describe, among other things, the specific amounts, prices and terms of any securities offered and
how the proceeds would be used. Any proceeds from the sale of securities would be used for general
business purposes, which may include, among other things, funding acquisitions of assets or
businesses, working capital, capital expenditures, investments in subsidiaries, the retirement of
existing debt and/or the repurchase of common units or other securities.
We believe our current cash balances, future internally-generated funds and funds available under
our Credit Agreement will provide sufficient resources to meet our working capital liquidity needs
for the foreseeable future. In May 2007, we paid a regular cash distribution for the first quarter
of 2007 of $0.69 on all units, an aggregate amount of $11.9 million. Included in this distribution
was $0.5 million paid to the general partner as an incentive distribution, as the distribution per
unit exceeded $0.55.
Cash and cash equivalents increased by less than $0.1 million during the six months ended June 30,
2007. The cash flows generated from operating activities of $26.5 million were offset by cash
flows used for financing activities of $24.8 million, in addition to cash flows used for investing
activities of $1.6 million. Working capital increased by $0.9 million to $10.3 million during the
six months ended June 30, 2007.
Cash Flows Operating Activities
Cash flows from operating activities increased by $4.0 million from $22.5 million for the six
months ended June 30, 2006 to $26.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2007. This increase
is mainly due to $5.1 million in additional cash collections from our major customers, resulting
principally from increased revenues and shortfall billings, partially offset by miscellaneous
year-over-year changes in collections and payments.
As discussed above, our major shippers are obligated to make deficiency payments to us if we do not
receive certain minimum revenue payments. Certain of these shippers then have the right to
recapture these amounts if future revenues exceed minimum levels. During the first six months of
2007, we received cash payments of approximately $2.7 million under these commitments. We billed
$3.1 million in the first six months of 2006 related to shortfalls produced during the six months
ended June 30, 2006, which expired without recapture and was recognized as revenue in the first six
months of 2007. Another $0.7 million is included in our accounts receivable at June 30, 2007
related to shortfalls produced in the second quarter of 2007.
Cash Flows Investing Activities
Cash flows used for investing activities decreased by $2.1 million from $3.7 million for the six
months ended June 30, 2006 to $1.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2007. Additions to
properties and equipment for the six months ended June 30, 2007 were $1.9 million, a decrease of
$1.8 million from $3.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006. During the six months ended
June 30, 2007, we also received cash proceeds of $0.3 million on the sale of certain assets.
Cash Flows Financing Activities
Cash flows used for financing activities were $24.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2007
as compared to $23.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006. During the first six months
of 2007, we paid cash distributions on all units and the general partner interest in the aggregate
amount of $23.4
- 30 -
Table of Contents
million, an increase of $2.2 million from $21.2 million in distributions paid during the first six
months of 2006. Cash distributions paid to the minority interest owner in Rio Grande was $0.5
million for the six months ended June 30, 2007, as compared to $1.2 million for the six months
ended June 30, 2006.
Capital Requirements
Our pipeline and terminalling operations are capital intensive, requiring investments to maintain,
expand, upgrade or enhance existing operations and to meet environmental and operational
regulations. Our capital requirements have consisted of, and are expected to continue to consist
of, maintenance capital expenditures and expansion capital expenditures. Maintenance capital
expenditures represent capital expenditures to replace partially or fully depreciated assets to
maintain the operating capacity of existing assets. Maintenance capital expenditures include
expenditures required to maintain equipment reliability, tankage and pipeline integrity, and safety
and to address environmental regulations. Expansion capital expenditures represent capital
expenditures to expand the operating capacity of existing or new assets, whether through
construction or acquisition. Expansion capital expenditures include expenditures to acquire assets
to grow our business and to expand existing facilities, such as projects that increase throughput
capacity on our pipelines and in our terminals. Repair and maintenance expenses associated with
existing assets that are minor in nature and do not extend the useful life of existing assets are
charged to operating expenses as incurred.
Each year the Holly Logistic Services, L.L.C. (HLS) board of directors approves our annual capital budget, which specifies capital
projects that our management is authorized to undertake. Additionally, at times when conditions
warrant or as new opportunities arise, special projects may be approved. The funds allocated for a
particular capital project may be expended over a period of years, depending on the time required
to complete the project. Therefore, our planned capital expenditures for a given year consist of
expenditures approved for capital projects included in the current years capital budget as well
as, in certain cases, expenditures approved for capital projects in capital budgets for prior
years.
In February 2007, the HLS board of directors authorized a letter of intent with Plains All American
Pipeline, L.P. (Plains) for HEP to acquire a 25% joint venture interest in a new 95-mile
intrastate pipeline system, now being constructed by Plains, for the shipment of up to 120,000 bpd
of crude oil into the Salt Lake City area. The pipeline would be owned by a new joint venture
company which would be owned 75% by Plains and 25% by HEP. Subject to the actual construction
cost, HEP would purchase its interest for between $22.0 and $25.5 million in the first quarter of
2008, when the new pipeline system is expected to become fully operational. The pipeline will
allow various refiners in the Salt Lake City area, including Hollys Woods Cross refinery, to ship
crude oil into the Salt Lake City area from the Utah terminus of the Frontier Pipeline as well as
crude oil from Wyoming and Utah, which is currently flowing on Plains Rocky Mountain Pipeline.
Our investment in the project is subject to various conditions, including the negotiation and
execution of mutually satisfactory definitive agreements.
We anticipate that our currently planned expenditures for sustaining and maintenance capital as
well as expenditures for smaller capital development projects (including the investment in the Utah
crude oil pipeline project as described in the preceding paragraph) will be funded with existing
cash balances, cash generated by operations and advances under our Credit Agreement.
As
previously announced, Holly
has entered into a Memorandum of Understanding with Sinclair Transportation
Company (Sinclair) to jointly build a 12-inch pipeline from Salt Lake City, Utah to Las Vegas,
Nevada, together with terminal facilities in the Cedar City, Utah and north Las Vegas areas (the
UNEV Pipeline). Subject to the execution of definitive agreements, Holly will own a 75% interest
and Sinclair will own a 25% interest in the project. We have an
understanding with Holly that we will be the operator and will have
an option to purchase Hollys interest in the project, effective for a 180-day period
commencing when the UNEV Pipeline becomes operational, at a purchase price equal to Hollys share
of actual costs, plus interest at 7% per annum. The initial capacity of the pipeline will be
approximately 62,000 bpd, with the capacity for further expansion to approximately 120,000 bpd.
The cost of the pipeline is expected to be approximately $235.0 million, and the total cost of the
project including terminals is expected to be approximately $300.0 million. Certain preliminary
work has already been carried out on this project by Holly. Construction of this project is
currently expected to be completed by the end of 2008.
- 31 -
Table of Contents
The HLS Board of Directors has also approved
a $48.3 million project to expand portions of the
Artesia, New Mexico to El Paso, Texas refined products pipeline and terminal system. The project
includes the replacement of 85 miles of existing
8-inch
pipeline with 12-inch pipeline, additional tankage capacity and other
enhancements to tie into the Kinder Morgan pump station in El Paso, enabling us to transport
increased volumes following the completion of Hollys planned expansion of the Navajo refinery.
The expansion will also allow us to transport up to 10,000 bpd of refinery feedstocks to third
parties in El Paso, Texas. The project is subject to entry into an
agreement with Holly for an increase in our tariffs for pipeline
shipments from the Navajo refinery.
We are also studying several other projects, which are in various stages of analysis.
We expect to use the issuance of common units and/or debt securities as well as borrowing under our
Credit Agreement as the principal means of financing large investments in major capital projects
such as the proposed Salt Lake City to Las Vegas pipeline project described in the preceding
paragraph.
Credit Agreement
We have a four-year, $100.0 million senior secured revolving Credit Agreement expiring in July
2008. Union Bank of California, N.A. is a lender and serves as administrative agent under this
agreement. The Credit Agreement is available to fund capital expenditures, acquisitions, and
working capital and for general partnership purposes. Advances under the Credit Agreement that are
designated for working capital are short-term liabilities. Other advances under the Credit
Agreement are classified as long-term liabilities. In addition, the Credit Agreement is available
to fund letters of credit up to a $50.0 million sub-limit. Up to $5.0 million is available to fund
distributions to unitholders. As of June 30, 2007, we had no amounts outstanding under the Credit
Agreement.
We have the right to request an increase in the maximum amount of the Credit Agreement, up to
$175.0 million. Such request will become effective if (a) certain conditions specified in the
Credit Agreement are met and (b) existing lenders under the Credit Agreement or other financial
institutions reasonably acceptable to the administrative agent commit to lend such increased
amounts under the agreement.
Our obligations under the Credit Agreement are secured by substantially all of our assets.
Indebtedness under the Credit Agreement is recourse to our general partner and guaranteed by our
wholly-owned subsidiaries.
We may prepay all loans at any time without penalty. We are required to reduce all working capital
borrowings under the Credit Agreement to zero for a period of at least 15 consecutive days once
each twelve-month period prior to the maturity date of the agreement.
Indebtedness under the Credit Agreement bears interest, at our option, at either (a) the base rate
as announced by the administrative agent plus an applicable margin (ranging from 0.25% to 1.00%) or
(b) at a rate equal to the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) plus an applicable margin
(ranging from 1.50% to 2.25%). In each case, the applicable margin is based upon the ratio of our
funded debt (as defined in the agreement) to EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation
and amortization, as defined in the Credit Agreement). We incur a commitment fee on the unused
portion of the Credit Agreement at a rate of 0.375% or 0.500% based upon the ratio of our funded
debt to EBITDA for the four most recently completed fiscal quarters. The agreement matures in July
2008. At that time, the agreement will terminate and all outstanding amounts thereunder will be
due and payable.
The Credit Agreement imposes certain requirements, including: a prohibition against distribution to
unitholders if, before or after the distribution, a potential default or an event of default as
defined in the agreement would occur; limitations on our ability to incur debt, make loans, acquire
other companies, change the nature of our business, enter a merger or consolidation, or sell
assets; and covenants that require maintenance of EBITDA to interest expense ratio and debt to
EBITDA ratio. If an event of default exists under the agreement, the lenders will be able to
accelerate the maturity of the debt and exercise other rights and remedies.
- 32 -
Table of Contents
Senior Notes Due 2015
The Senior Notes mature on March 1, 2015 and bear interest at 6.25%. The Senior Notes are
unsecured and impose certain restrictive covenants, including limitations on our ability to incur
additional indebtedness, make investments, sell assets, incur certain liens, pay distributions,
enter into transactions with affiliates, and enter into mergers. At any time when the Senior Notes
are rated investment grade by both Moodys and Standard & Poors and no default or event of default
exists, we will not be subject to many of the foregoing covenants. Additionally, we have certain
redemption rights under the Senior Notes.
The $185.0 million principal amount of Senior Notes is recorded at $181.4 million on our
accompanying consolidated balance sheet at June 30, 2007. The difference is due to the $2.9
million unamortized discount and $0.7 million relating to the fair value of the interest rate swap
contract as further discussed under Risk Management.
Impact of Inflation
Inflation in the United States has been relatively low in recent years and did not have a material
impact on our results of operations for the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006.
A substantial majority of our revenues are generated under long-term contracts that include the
right to increase our rates and minimum revenue guarantees annually for increases in the PPI.
Historically, the PPI has increased an average of 3.9% annually over the past 3 calendar years.
Environmental Matters
Our operation of pipelines, terminals, and associated facilities in connection with the storage and
transportation of refined products is subject to stringent and complex federal, state, and local
laws and regulations governing the discharge of materials into the environment, or otherwise
relating to the protection of the environment. As with the industry generally, compliance with
existing and anticipated laws and regulations increases our overall cost of business, including our
capital costs to construct, maintain, and upgrade equipment and facilities. While these laws and
regulations affect our maintenance capital expenditures and net income, we believe that they do not
affect our competitive position in that the operations of our competitors are similarly affected.
We believe that our operations are in substantial compliance with applicable environmental laws and
regulations. However, these laws and regulations, and the interpretation or enforcement thereof,
are subject to frequent change by regulatory authorities, and we are unable to predict the ongoing
cost to us of complying with these laws and regulations or the future impact of these laws and
regulations on our operations. Violation of environmental laws, regulations, and permits can
result in the imposition of significant administrative, civil and criminal penalties, injunctions,
and construction bans or delays. A discharge of hydrocarbons or hazardous substances into the
environment could, to the extent the event is not insured, subject us to substantial expense,
including both the cost to comply with applicable laws and regulations and claims made by
employees, neighboring landowners and other third parties for personal injury and property damage.
We inspect our pipelines regularly using equipment rented from third-party suppliers. Third
parties also assist us in interpreting the results of the inspections.
Holly has agreed to indemnify us in an aggregate amount not to exceed $15.0 million for ten years
after the closing of our initial public offering on July 13, 2004 for environmental noncompliance
and remediation liabilities associated with the assets initially transferred to us and occurring or
existing before that date, and provide $2.5 million of additional indemnification for the
Intermediate Pipelines acquired in July 2005. Additionally, we entered into an
environmental agreement with Alon with respect to pre-closing environmental costs and liabilities
relating to the pipelines and terminals acquired from Alon in February 2005, where Alon will
indemnify us for ten years subject to a $100,000 deductible and a $20.0 million maximum liability
cap.
- 33 -
Table of Contents
Contamination resulting from spills of refined products and crude oil is not unusual within the
petroleum pipeline industry. Historic spills along our existing pipelines and terminals as a
result of past operations have resulted in contamination of the environment, including soils and
groundwater. Site conditions, including soils and groundwater, are being evaluated at a few of our
properties where operations may have resulted in releases of hydrocarbons and other wastes, none of
which we believe will have a significant effect on our operations as they would be covered under an
environmental indemnification agreement.
An environmental remediation project is in progress currently at our El Paso terminal, the
remaining costs of which are projected to be approximately $2.1 million over the next five years.
Other parties are undertaking remediation projects at our Boise, Burley and Albuquerque terminals,
and we are obligated to pay a portion of these costs at the Albuquerque terminal, but not at the
Boise or Burley terminals. As of June 30, 2007, we estimate the total remaining remediation cost
for the Albuquerque terminal to be insignificant. A remediation project is also under way in New
Mexico concerning a leak on our refined product pipeline from Artesia, New Mexico to Orla, Texas.
As of June 30, 2007, we estimate the remaining cost on this project to be $0.3 million, of which
$0.1 million will be incurred in 2007. Holly has agreed, subject to a $15.0 million limit, to
indemnify us for environmental liabilities related to the assets transferred to us by Holly to the
extent such liabilities existed or arose from operation of these assets prior to the closing of our
initial public offering on July 13, 2004 and are asserted within 10 years after that date. The
Holly indemnification will cover the costs associated with the remediation projects mentioned
above, including assessment, monitoring, and remediation programs.
In the fourth quarter of 2005, we experienced a refined product release near Sweetwater, Texas. As
of June 30, 2007, we estimate that the total remaining remediation cost for this incident to be
insignificant. This occurrence is not subject to indemnification from Alon.
We may experience future releases into the environment from our pipelines and terminals, or
discover historical releases that were previously unidentified or not assessed. Although we
maintain an extensive inspection and audit program designed, as applicable, to prevent, detect and
address these releases promptly, damages and liabilities incurred due to any future environmental
releases from our assets nevertheless have the potential to substantially affect our business.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Our discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon our
consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States. The preparation of these financial statements
requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets,
liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities as
of the date of the financial statements. Actual results may differ from these estimates under
different assumptions or conditions. We consider the following policies to be the most critical to
understanding the judgments that are involved and the uncertainties that could impact our results
of operations, financial condition and cash flows.
Our significant accounting policies are described in Item 7. Managements Discussion and Analysis
of Financial Condition and Operations Critical Accounting Policies in our Annual Report on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006. Certain critical accounting policies that materially
affect the amounts recorded in our consolidated financial statements include revenue recognition,
assessing the possible impairment of certain long-lived assets and assessing contingent liabilities
for probable losses. There have been no changes to these policies in 2007.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
Interpretation No. 48 Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes
In June 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Interpretation No. 48,
Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes. This interpretation clarifies the accounting for
uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an enterprises financial statements by prescribing a
recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and
measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. This interpretation
also provides guidance on
- 34 -
Table of Contents
derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure
and transition. We adopted this standard effective January 1, 2007. The adoption of this standard
did not have a material impact on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
RISK MANAGEMENT
We have entered into an interest rate swap contract to effectively convert the interest expense
associated with $60.0 million of our 6.25% Senior Notes from a fixed rate to variable rates. Under
the swap agreement, we receive 6.25% fixed rate on the notional amount and pay a variable rate
equal to three-month LIBOR plus an applicable margin of 1.1575%. The variable rate being paid on
the notional amount at June 30, 2007 was 6.5175%, including the applicable margin. The maturity of
the swap contract is March 1, 2015, matching the maturity of the Senior Notes.
This interest rate swap has been designated as a fair value hedge as defined by SFAS No. 133. Our
interest rate swap meets the conditions required to assume no ineffectiveness under SFAS No. 133
and, therefore, we have used the shortcut method of accounting prescribed for fair value hedges
by SFAS No. 133. Accordingly, we adjust the carrying value of the swap to its fair value each
quarter, with an offsetting entry to adjust the carrying value of the debt securities whose fair
value is being hedged. We record interest expense equal to the variable rate payments under the
swaps.
The
fair value of the interest rate swap agreement of $0.7 million is included in Other long-term
liabilities in our accompanying consolidated balance sheet at June 30, 2007. The offsetting entry
to adjust the carrying value of the debt securities whose fair value is being hedged is recognized
as a reduction of Long-term debt on our accompanying consolidated balance sheet at June 30, 2007.
The market risk inherent in our debt instruments and positions is the potential change arising from
increases or decreases in interest rates as discussed below.
At June 30, 2007, we had an outstanding principal balance on our unsecured Senior Notes of $185.0
million. By means of our interest rate swap contract, we have effectively converted $60.0 million
of the Senior Notes from a fixed rate to variable rate. For the fixed rate debt portion of $125.0
million, changes in interest rates would generally affect the fair value of the debt, but not our
earnings or cash flows. Conversely, for the variable rate debt portion of $60.0 million, changes
in interest rates would generally not impact the fair value of the debt, but may affect our future
earnings and cash flows. We estimate a hypothetical 10% change in the yield-to-maturity applicable
to our fixed rate debt portion of $125.0 million as of June 30, 2007 would result in a change of
approximately $5.0 million in the fair value of the debt. A hypothetical 10% change in the
interest rate applicable to our variable rate debt portion of $60.0 million would not have a
material effect on our earnings or cash flows.
At June 30, 2007, our cash and cash equivalents included highly liquid investments with a maturity
of three months or less at the time of purchase. Due to the short-term nature of our cash and cash
equivalents, a hypothetical 10% increase in interest rates would not have a material effect on the
fair market value of our portfolio. Since we have the ability to liquidate this portfolio, we do
not expect our operating results or cash flows to be materially affected to any significant degree
by the effect of a sudden change in market interest rates on our investment portfolio.
Our operations are subject to normal hazards of operations, including fire, explosion and
weather-related perils. We maintain various insurance coverages, including business interruption
insurance, subject to certain deductibles. We are not fully insured against certain risks because
such risks are not fully insurable, coverage is unavailable, or premium costs, in our judgment, do
not justify such expenditures.
- 35 -
Table of Contents
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risks
Market risk is the risk of loss arising from adverse changes in market rates and prices. See Risk
Management under Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations for a discussion of market risk exposures that we have with respect to our cash and
cash equivalents and long-term debt. We utilize derivative instruments to hedge our interest rate
exposure, also discussed under Risk Management.
Since we do not own products shipped on our pipelines or terminalled at our terminal facilities we
do not have market risks associated with commodity prices.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
(a) Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures
Our principal executive officer and principal financial officer have evaluated, as required by Rule
13a-15(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act), our disclosure controls
and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e)) as of the end of the period covered by
this quarterly report on Form 10-Q. Based on that evaluation, the principal executive officer and
principal financial officer concluded that the design and operation of our disclosure controls and
procedures are effective in ensuring that information we are required to disclose in the reports
that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported,
within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commissions rules and forms.
(b) Changes in internal control over financial reporting
During the quarter ended June 30, 2007, we implemented a new accounting software system, which
required modifications to our existing system of internal control over financial reporting due to
the technical changes in the accounting software system. We have reviewed our modified internal
controls and believe that they are appropriate and are functioning effectively.
- 36 -
Table of Contents
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal proceedings
We are a party to various legal and regulatory proceedings, none of which we believe will have a
material adverse impact on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
Item 6. Exhibits
12.1*
|
Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges | |
31.1*
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer under Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
31.2*
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer under Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
32.1*
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
32.2*
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
* | Filed herewith |
- 37 -
Table of Contents
HOLLY ENERGY PARTNERS, L.P.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
HOLLY ENERGY PARTNERS, L.P. | ||||
(Registrant) | ||||
By: HEP LOGISTICS HOLDINGS, L.P. its General Partner |
||||
By: HOLLY LOGISTIC SERVICES, L.L.C. its General Partner |
||||
Date: August 3, 2007
|
/s/ P. Dean Ridenour | |||
P. Dean Ridenour | ||||
Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer and Director |
||||
(Principal Accounting Officer) | ||||
/s/ Stephen J. McDonnell | ||||
Stephen J. McDonnell | ||||
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer | ||||
(Principal Financial Officer) |
- 38 -