HOME BANCSHARES INC - Quarter Report: 2010 March (Form 10-Q)
Table of Contents
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, DC 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
þ | Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
For the Quarterly Period Ended March 31, 2010
or
o | Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
For the Transition period from to
Commission File Number: 000-51904
HOME BANCSHARES, INC.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
Arkansas | 71-0682831 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
|
719 Harkrider, Suite 100, Conway, Arkansas | 72032 | |
(Address of principal executive offices) | (Zip Code) |
(501) 328-4770
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Not Applicable
Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a
non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of large accelerated
filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer o | Accelerated filer þ | Non-accelerated filer o | Smaller reporting company o | |||
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the registrants classes of common stock, as
of the latest practical date.
Common Stock Issued and Outstanding: 25,725,160 shares as of May 4, 2010.
HOME BANCSHARES, INC.
FORM 10-Q
March 31, 2010
FORM 10-Q
March 31, 2010
INDEX
Page No. | ||||||||
4 | ||||||||
5 | ||||||||
6-7 | ||||||||
8 | ||||||||
9-34 | ||||||||
35 | ||||||||
36-65 | ||||||||
66-68 | ||||||||
69 | ||||||||
69 | ||||||||
69 | ||||||||
69 | ||||||||
69 | ||||||||
69 | ||||||||
70 | ||||||||
70 | ||||||||
71 | ||||||||
Exhibit List |
||||||||
EX-12.1 | ||||||||
EX-15 | ||||||||
EX-31.1 | ||||||||
EX-31.2 | ||||||||
EX-32.1 | ||||||||
EX-32.2 |
Table of Contents
CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
Some of our statements contained in this document, including matters discussed under the
caption Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation are
forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Forward-looking
statements relate to future events or our future financial performance and include statements about
the competitiveness of the banking industry, potential regulatory obligations, our entrance and
expansion into other markets, our other business strategies and other statements that are not
historical facts. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of performance or results. When we
use words like may, plan, contemplate, anticipate, believe, intend, continue,
expect, project, predict, estimate, could, should, would, and similar expressions,
you should consider them as identifying forward-looking statements, although we may use other
phrasing. These forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties and are based on our
beliefs and assumptions, and on the information available to us at the time that these disclosures
were prepared. These forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties and may not be
realized due to a variety of factors, including, but not limited to, the following:
| the effects of future economic conditions, including inflation, deflation or a continued decrease in residential housing values; | ||
| governmental monetary and fiscal policies, as well as legislative and regulatory changes; | ||
| the risks of changes in interest rates or the level and composition of deposits, loan demand and the values of loan collateral, securities and interest sensitive assets and liabilities; | ||
| the effects of terrorism and efforts to combat it; | ||
| credit risks; | ||
| the effects of competition from other commercial banks, thrifts, mortgage banking firms, consumer finance companies, credit unions, securities brokerage firms, insurance companies, money market and other mutual funds and other financial institutions operating in our market area and elsewhere, including institutions operating regionally, nationally and internationally, together with competitors offering banking products and services by mail, telephone and the Internet; | ||
| the effect of any mergers, acquisitions or other transactions to which we or our subsidiaries may from time to time be a party, including our ability to successfully integrate any businesses that we acquire; and | ||
| the failure of assumptions underlying the establishment of our allowance for loan losses. |
All written or oral forward-looking statements attributable to us are expressly qualified in
their entirety by this Cautionary Note. Our actual results may differ significantly from those we
discuss in these forward-looking statements. For other factors, risks and uncertainties that could
cause our actual results to differ materially from estimates and projections contained in these
forward-looking statements, see the Risk Factors section of our Form 10-K filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on March 5, 2010.
Table of Contents
PART I: FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1: Financial Statements
Home
BancShares, Inc.
Consolidated Balance Sheets
March 31, | December 31, | |||||||
(In thousands, except share data) | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||
Assets |
||||||||
Cash and due from banks |
$ | 36,237 | $ | 39,970 | ||||
Interest-bearing deposits with other banks |
156,772 | 133,520 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
193,009 | 173,490 | ||||||
Federal funds sold |
11,207 | 11,760 | ||||||
Investment securities available for sale |
362,710 | 322,115 | ||||||
Loans receivable not covered by loss share |
1,959,666 | 1,950,285 | ||||||
Loans receivable covered by FDIC loss share |
225,885 | | ||||||
Allowance for loan losses |
(42,845 | ) | (42,968 | ) | ||||
Loans receivable, net |
2,142,706 | 1,907,317 | ||||||
Bank premises and equipment, net |
69,997 | 70,810 | ||||||
Foreclosed assets held for sale not covered by loss share |
17,610 | 16,484 | ||||||
Foreclosed assets held for sale covered by FDIC loss share |
8,672 | | ||||||
FDIC indemnification asset |
88,274 | | ||||||
Cash value of life insurance |
51,019 | 52,176 | ||||||
Investments in unconsolidated affiliates |
1,424 | 1,424 | ||||||
Accrued interest receivable |
14,854 | 13,137 | ||||||
Deferred tax asset, net |
10,072 | 14,777 | ||||||
Goodwill |
53,039 | 53,039 | ||||||
Core deposit and other intangibles |
6,989 | 4,698 | ||||||
Mortgage servicing rights |
872 | 1,090 | ||||||
Other assets |
45,745 | 42,548 | ||||||
Total assets |
$ | 3,078,199 | $ | 2,684,865 | ||||
Liabilities and Stockholders Equity |
||||||||
Deposits: |
||||||||
Demand and non-interest-bearing |
$ | 354,663 | $ | 302,228 | ||||
Savings and interest-bearing transaction accounts |
863,988 | 714,744 | ||||||
Time deposits |
1,002,437 | 818,451 | ||||||
Total deposits |
2,221,088 | 1,835,423 | ||||||
Federal funds purchased |
| | ||||||
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase |
55,403 | 62,000 | ||||||
FHLB borrowed funds |
254,548 | 264,360 | ||||||
Accrued interest payable and other liabilities |
21,360 | 10,625 | ||||||
Subordinated debentures |
47,462 | 47,484 | ||||||
Total liabilities |
2,599,861 | 2,219,892 | ||||||
Stockholders equity: |
||||||||
Preferred stock; $0.01 par value; 5,500,000 shares authorized: |
||||||||
Series A fixed rate cumulative perpetual; liquidation preference
of $1,000 per share; 50,000 shares issued and outstanding at
March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009. |
49,320 | 49,275 | ||||||
Common stock, par value $0.01; shares authorized 50,000,000; shares
issued and outstanding 25,715,528 in 2010 and 25,690,137 in 2009 |
257 | 257 | ||||||
Capital surplus |
363,870 | 363,519 | ||||||
Retained earnings |
63,907 | 51,746 | ||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
984 | 176 | ||||||
Total stockholders equity |
478,338 | 464,973 | ||||||
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
$ | 3,078,199 | $ | 2,684,865 | ||||
See
Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
4
Table of Contents
Home
BancShares, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Income
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||
(In thousands, except per share data) | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||
Interest income: |
||||||||
Loans |
$ | 29,866 | $ | 29,138 | ||||
Investment securities |
||||||||
Taxable |
1,627 | 2,653 | ||||||
Tax-exempt |
1,479 | 1,298 | ||||||
Deposits other banks |
85 | 12 | ||||||
Federal funds sold |
5 | 7 | ||||||
Total interest income |
33,062 | 33,108 | ||||||
Interest expense: |
||||||||
Interest on deposits |
5,295 | 8,118 | ||||||
Federal funds purchased |
| 2 | ||||||
FHLB borrowed funds |
2,177 | 2,390 | ||||||
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase |
94 | 111 | ||||||
Subordinated debentures |
597 | 676 | ||||||
Total interest expense |
8,163 | 11,297 | ||||||
Net interest income |
24,899 | 21,811 | ||||||
Provision for loan losses |
3,100 | 1,000 | ||||||
Net interest income after provision for loan losses |
21,799 | 20,811 | ||||||
Non-interest income: |
||||||||
Service charges on deposit accounts |
3,141 | 3,374 | ||||||
Other service charges and fees |
1,638 | 1,784 | ||||||
Mortgage lending income |
412 | 880 | ||||||
Mortgage servicing income |
160 | 200 | ||||||
Insurance commissions |
347 | 257 | ||||||
Income from title services |
107 | 140 | ||||||
Increase in cash value of life insurance |
428 | 477 | ||||||
Dividends from FHLB, FRB & bankers bank |
126 | 107 | ||||||
Gain on acquisitions |
11,790 | | ||||||
Gain (loss) on sale of premises and equipment, net |
207 | 7 | ||||||
Gain (loss) on OREO, net |
159 | (117 | ) | |||||
Gain (loss) on securities, net |
| | ||||||
Other income |
586 | 476 | ||||||
Total non-interest income |
19,101 | 7,585 | ||||||
Non-interest expense: |
||||||||
Salaries and employee benefits |
8,534 | 8,944 | ||||||
Occupancy and equipment |
2,799 | 2,677 | ||||||
Data processing expense |
862 | 777 | ||||||
Other operating expenses |
6,360 | 6,864 | ||||||
Total non-interest expense |
18,555 | 19,262 | ||||||
Income before income taxes |
22,345 | 9,134 | ||||||
Income tax expense |
7,971 | 2,889 | ||||||
Net income available to all stockholders |
14,374 | 6,245 | ||||||
Preferred stock dividends and accretion of discount on preferred stock |
670 | 566 | ||||||
Net income available to common stockholders |
$ | 13,704 | $ | 5,679 | ||||
Basic earnings per common share |
$ | 0.53 | $ | 0.29 | ||||
Diluted earnings per common share |
$ | 0.53 | $ | 0.28 | ||||
See
Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
5
Table of Contents
Home
BancShares, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders Equity
Three Months Ended March 31, 2010 and 2009
Three Months Ended March 31, 2010 and 2009
Accumulated | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Preferred | Common | Capital | Retained | Comprehensive | ||||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands, except share data) | Stock | Stock | Surplus | Earnings | Income (Loss) | Total | ||||||||||||||||||
Balance at January 1, 2009 |
$ | | $ | 199 | $ | 253,581 | $ | 32,639 | $ | (3,375 | ) | $ | 283,044 | |||||||||||
Comprehensive income: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income |
| | | 6,245 | | 6,245 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other comprehensive income: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Unrealized loss on investment securities
available for sale, net of tax effect of $789 |
| | | | 1,223 | 1,223 | ||||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive income |
7,468 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of 50,000 shares of preferred stock and a
warrant for 144,164 shares of common stock |
49,094 | | 906 | | | 50,000 | ||||||||||||||||||
Accretion of discount on preferred stock |
45 | | | (45 | ) | | | |||||||||||||||||
Net issuance of 5,065 shares of common stock from
exercise of stock options |
| | 39 | | | 39 | ||||||||||||||||||
Tax benefit from stock options exercised |
| | 25 | | | 25 | ||||||||||||||||||
Share-based compensation |
| | (50 | ) | | | (50 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Cash dividends Preferred Stock - 5% |
| | | (521 | ) | | (521 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Cash dividends Common Stock,
$0.06 per share |
| | | (1,192 | ) | | (1,192 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Balances at March 31, 2009 (unaudited) |
49,139 | 199 | 254,501 | 37,126 | (2,152 | ) | 338,813 | |||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive income: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net loss |
| | | 20,561 | | 20,561 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other comprehensive income: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Unrealized gain on investment securities
available for sale, net of tax effect of $1,503 |
| | | | 2,328 | 2,328 | ||||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive income |
22,889 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of 5,692,500 shares of common stock from
public stock offering, net of offering costs
of $5,634. |
| 57 | 107,284 | | | 107,341 | ||||||||||||||||||
Accretion of discount on preferred stock |
136 | | | (136 | ) | | | |||||||||||||||||
Net issuance of 122,045 shares of common stock
from exercise of stock options |
| 1 | 1,351 | | | 1,352 | ||||||||||||||||||
Tax benefit from stock options exercised |
| | 414 | | | 414 | ||||||||||||||||||
Share-based compensation |
| | (31 | ) | | | (31 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Cash dividends Preferred stock - 5% |
| | | (1,874 | ) | | (1,874 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Cash dividends Common Stock, $0.18 per share |
| | | (3,931 | ) | | (3,931 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Balances at December 31, 2009 |
49,275 | 257 | 363,519 | 51,746 | 176 | 464,973 |
See
Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
6
Table of Contents
Home BancShares, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders Equity Continued
Three Months Ended March 31, 2010 and 2009
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders Equity Continued
Three Months Ended March 31, 2010 and 2009
Accumulated Other | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Preferred | Comprehensive | |||||||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands, except share data) | Stock | Common Stock | Capital Surplus | Retained Earnings | Income (Loss) | Total | ||||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive income: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income |
| | | 14,374 | | 14,374 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other comprehensive income: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Unrealized gain on investment securities
available for sale, net of tax effect of $521 |
| | | | 808 | 808 | ||||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive income |
15,182 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Accretion of discount on preferred stock |
45 | | | (45 | ) | | | |||||||||||||||||
Net issuance of 8,291 shares of common stock from
exercise of stock options |
| | 90 | | | 90 | ||||||||||||||||||
Disgorgement of profits |
| | 1 | | | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||
Tax benefit from stock options exercised |
| | 40 | | | 40 | ||||||||||||||||||
Share-based compensation |
| | 220 | | | 220 | ||||||||||||||||||
Cash dividend Preferred Stock - 5% |
| | | (625 | ) | | (625 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Cash dividends Common Stock, $0.06 per share |
| | | (1,543 | ) | | (1,543 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Balances at March 31, 2010 (unaudited) |
$ | 49,320 | $ | 257 | $ | 363,870 | $ | 63,907 | $ | 984 | $ | 478,338 | ||||||||||||
See
Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
7
Table of Contents
Home
BancShares, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Period Ended March 31, | ||||||||
(In thousands) | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||
Operating Activities |
||||||||
Net income |
$ | 14,374 | $ | 6,245 | ||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by
(used in) operating activities: |
||||||||
Depreciation |
1,289 | 1,301 | ||||||
Amortization/accretion |
829 | 658 | ||||||
Share-based compensation |
220 | (50 | ) | |||||
Tax benefits from stock options exercised |
(40 | ) | (25 | ) | ||||
Loss on assets |
(366 | ) | 110 | |||||
Gain on acquisitions |
(11,790 | ) | | |||||
Provision for loan losses |
3,100 | 1,000 | ||||||
Deferred income tax benefit |
4,184 | (1,181 | ) | |||||
Increase in cash value of life insurance |
(428 | ) | (477 | ) | ||||
Originations of mortgage loans held for sale |
(21,307 | ) | (59,049 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from sales of mortgage loans held for sale |
20,701 | 55,132 | ||||||
Changes in assets and liabilities: |
||||||||
Accrued interest receivable |
(1,717 | ) | 265 | |||||
Other assets |
655 | (1,652 | ) | |||||
Accrued interest payable and other liabilities |
3,102 | 5,537 | ||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
12,806 | 7,814 | ||||||
Investing Activities |
||||||||
Net (increase) decrease in federal funds sold |
3,632 | (7,645 | ) | |||||
Net (increase) decrease in loans net, excluding loans acquired |
(15,057 | ) | (16,410 | ) | ||||
Purchases of investment securities available for sale |
(39,552 | ) | (11,020 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from maturities of investment securities available for sale |
30,459 | 33,289 | ||||||
Proceeds from foreclosed assets held for sale |
2,213 | 673 | ||||||
Purchases of premises and equipment, net |
(225 | ) | (499 | ) | ||||
Death benefits received |
1,585 | | ||||||
Acquisition of Centennial Bancshares, Inc., net funds received |
| (3,100 | ) | |||||
Net cash proceeds received in FDIC assisted acquisitions |
71,652 | | ||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities |
54,707 | (4,712 | ) | |||||
Financing Activities |
||||||||
Net increase (decrease) in deposits, net of deposits acquired |
(9,538 | ) | (11,461 | ) | ||||
Net increase (decrease) in securities sold under agreements to repurchase |
(6,597 | ) | (38,911 | ) | ||||
Net increase (decrease) in federal funds purchased |
| | ||||||
Net increase (decrease) in FHLB and other borrowed funds, net of acquired |
(29,822 | ) | (5,148 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from exercise of stock options |
90 | 39 | ||||||
Proceeds from issuance of preferred stock and common stock warrant |
| 50,000 | ||||||
Disgorgement of profits |
1 | | ||||||
Tax benefits from stock options exercised |
40 | 25 | ||||||
Dividends paid on preferred stock |
(625 | ) | (201 | ) | ||||
Dividends paid on common stock |
(1,543 | ) | (1,192 | ) | ||||
Net cash provided by financing activities |
(47,994 | ) | (6,849 | ) | ||||
Net change in cash and cash equivalents |
19,519 | (3,747 | ) | |||||
Cash and cash equivalents beginning of year |
173,490 | 54,168 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents end of period |
$ | 193,009 | $ | 50,421 | ||||
See
Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
8
Table of Contents
Home BancShares, Inc.
Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
(Unaudited)
1. Nature of Operations and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Nature of Operations
Home BancShares, Inc. (the Company or HBI) is a bank holding company headquartered in Conway,
Arkansas. The Company is primarily engaged in providing a full range of banking services to
individual and corporate customers through its wholly owned community bank subsidiary Centennial
Bank (the Bank). During 2009, the Company completed the combination of its former bank charters
into a single charter, adopting Centennial Bank as the common name. The Bank has locations in
central Arkansas, north central Arkansas, southern Arkansas, the Florida Keys, central Florida and
southwestern Florida. The Company is subject to competition from other financial institutions. The
Company also is subject to the regulation of certain federal and state agencies and undergoes
periodic examinations by those regulatory authorities.
A summary of the significant accounting policies of the Company follows:
Operating Segments
Community banking is the Companys only operating segment. No revenues are derived from
foreign countries and no single external customer comprises more than 10% of the Companys
revenues.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and
liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and
expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Material estimates that are particularly susceptible to significant change relate to the
determination of the allowance for loan losses and the valuation of foreclosed assets. In
connection with the determination of the allowance for loan losses and the valuation of foreclosed
assets, management obtains independent appraisals for significant properties.
Principles of Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of HBI and its subsidiaries.
Significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
Reclassifications
Various items within the accompanying financial statements for previous years have been
reclassified to provide more comparative information. These reclassifications had no effect on net
earnings or stockholders equity.
Investments in Unconsolidated Affiliates
The Company has invested funds representing 100% ownership in five statutory trusts which
issue trust preferred securities. The Companys investment in these trusts was $1.4 million at
March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009. Under accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States of America, these trusts are not consolidated.
9
Table of Contents
The summarized financial information below represents an aggregation of the Companys
unconsolidated affiliates as of March 31, 2010 and 2009, and for the three-month period then ended:
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Assets |
$ | 47,424 | $ | 47,424 | ||||
Liabilities |
46,000 | 46,000 | ||||||
Equity |
1,424 | 1,424 | ||||||
Net income |
| |
Acquisition Accounting, Covered Loans and Related Indemnification Asset
Beginning in 2009, the Company accounts for its acquisitions under ASC Topic 805, Business
Combinations, which requires the use of the purchase method of accounting. All identifiable assets
acquired, including loans, are recorded at fair value. No allowance for loan losses related to the
acquired loans is recorded on the acquisition date as the fair value of the loans acquired
incorporates assumptions regarding credit risk. Loans acquired are recorded at fair value in
accordance with the fair value methodology prescribed in ASC Topic 820, exclusive of the
shared-loss agreements with the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC). The fair value
estimates associated with the loans include estimates related to expected prepayments and the
amount and timing of undiscounted expected principal, interest and other cash flows.
Over the life of the acquired loans, the Company continues to estimate cash flows expected to
be collected on individual loans or on pools of loans sharing common risk characteristics and were
treated in the aggregate when applying various valuation techniques. The Company evaluates at each
balance sheet date whether the present value of its loans determined using the effective interest
rates has decreased and if so, recognizes a provision for loan loss in its consolidated statement
of income. For any increases in cash flows expected to be collected, the Company adjusts the amount
of accretable yield recognized on a prospective basis over the loans or pools remaining life.
Because the FDIC will reimburse the Company for certain acquired loans should the Company
experience a loss, an indemnification asset is recorded at fair value at the acquisition date. The
indemnification asset is recognized at the same time as the indemnified loans, and measured on the
same basis, subject to collectability or contractual limitations. The shared-loss agreements on the
acquisition date reflect the reimbursements expected to be received from the FDIC, using an
appropriate discount rate, which reflects counterparty credit risk and other uncertainties.
The shared-loss agreements continue to be measured on the same basis as the related
indemnified loans. Because the acquired loans are subject to the accounting prescribed by ASC Topic
310, subsequent changes to the basis of the shared-loss agreements also follow that model.
Deterioration in the credit quality of the loans (immediately recorded as an adjustment to the
allowance for loan losses) would immediately increase the basis of the shared-loss agreements, with
the offset recorded through the consolidated statement of income. Increases in the credit quality
or cash flows of loans (reflected as an adjustment to yield and accreted into income over the
remaining life of the loans) decrease the basis of the shared-loss agreements, with such decrease
being accreted into income over 1) the same period or 2) the life of the shared-loss agreements,
whichever is shorter. Loss assumptions used in the basis of the indemnified loans are consistent
with the loss assumptions used to measure the indemnification asset. Fair value accounting
incorporates into the fair value of the indemnification asset an element of the time value of
money, which is accreted back into income over the life of the shared-loss agreements.
Upon the determination of an incurred loss the indemnification asset will be reduced by the
amount owed by the FDIC. A corresponding, claim receivable is recorded until cash is received from
the FDIC.
For further discussion of the Companys acquisitions and loan accounting, see Note 2 and Note
5 to the consolidated financial statements.
10
Table of Contents
Interim financial information
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements as of March 31, 2010 and 2009
have been prepared in condensed format, and therefore do not include all of the information and
footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for
complete financial statements.
The information furnished in these interim statements reflects all adjustments, which are, in
the opinion of management, necessary for a fair statement of the results for each respective period
presented. Such adjustments are of a normal recurring nature. The results of operations in the
interim statements are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for any other
quarter or for the full year. The interim financial information should be read in conjunction with
the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Companys 2009 Form 10-K,
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Earnings per Share
Basic earnings per share are computed based on the weighted average number of shares
outstanding during each year. Diluted earnings per share are computed using the weighted average
common shares and all potential dilutive common shares outstanding during the period. The
following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per common share (EPS) for
the three-month period ended March 31:
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Net income available to common stockholders |
$ | 13,704 | $ | 5,679 | ||||
Average shares outstanding |
25,707 | 19,863 | ||||||
Effect of common stock options |
229 | 256 | ||||||
Diluted shares outstanding |
25,936 | 20,119 | ||||||
Basic earnings per common share |
$ | 0.53 | $ | 0.29 | ||||
Diluted earnings per common share |
$ | 0.53 | $ | 0.28 |
Warrants to purchase 144,065 shares of common stock at $26.03 were outstanding at March 31,
2010 and December 31, 2009, but were not included in the computation of diluted EPS because the
exercise prices were greater than the average market price of the common shares.
2. Business Combinations
Acquisition Old Southern Bank
On March 12, 2010, Centennial Bank entered into a purchase and assumption agreement (Old
Southern Agreement) with the FDIC, as receiver, pursuant to which the Bank acquired certain assets
and assumed substantially all of the deposits and certain liabilities of Old Southern Bank (Old
Southern).
Prior to the acquisition, Old Southern operated 7 banking centers in the Orlando, Florida
metropolitan area. Excluding the effects of purchase accounting adjustments, Centennial Bank
acquired $335.4 million in assets and assumed approximately $328.5 million of the deposits of Old
Southern. Additionally, Centennial Bank purchased loans with an estimated fair value of $179.1
million, $3.1 million of foreclosed assets and $30.4 million of investment securities.
11
Table of Contents
In connection with the Old Southern acquisition, Centennial Bank entered into a loss sharing
agreement with the FDIC that covers $282.0 million of assets, based upon the sellers records,
including single family residential mortgage loans, commercial real estate, commercial and
industrial loans, and foreclosed assets (collectively, covered assets). Centennial Bank acquired
other Old Southern assets that are not covered by the loss sharing agreement with the FDIC
including interest-bearing deposits with other banks, investment securities purchased at fair
market value and other tangible assets. Pursuant to the terms of the loss sharing agreement, the
covered assets are subject to a stated loss threshold of $110.0 million whereby the FDIC will
reimburse Centennial Bank for 80% of losses of up to $110.0 million, and 95% of losses in excess of
this amount. Centennial Bank will reimburse the FDIC for its share of recoveries with respect to
losses for which the FDIC paid Centennial Bank a reimbursement under the loss sharing agreement.
The FDICs obligation to reimburse Centennial Bank for losses with respect to covered assets begins
with the first dollar of loss incurred.
The amounts covered by the loss sharing agreement are the pre-acquisition book values of the
underlying covered assets, the contractual balance of unfunded commitments that were acquired, and
certain future net direct costs. The loss sharing agreements applicable to single family
residential mortgage loans provide for FDIC loss sharing and Centennial Bank reimbursement to the
FDIC, in each case as described above, for ten years. The loss sharing agreements applicable to all
other covered assets provide for FDIC loss sharing for five years and Centennial Bank reimbursement
of recoveries to the FDIC for eight years, in each case as described above.
The loss sharing agreement is subject to certain servicing procedures as specified in
agreements with the FDIC. The expected reimbursements under the loss sharing agreements were
recorded as indemnification assets at their estimated fair values of $76.0 million for the Old
Southern Agreement, on the acquisition date. The indemnification assets reflect the present value
of the expected net cash reimbursement related to the loss sharing agreements described above.
Centennial Bank has determined that the acquisition of the net assets of Old Southern
constitute a business combination as defined by the FASB ASC Topic 805, Business Combinations.
Accordingly, the assets acquired and liabilities assumed are presented at their fair values as
required. Fair values were determined based on the requirements of FASB ASC Topic 820, Fair Value
Measurements. In many cases, the determination of these fair values required management to make
estimates about discount rates, future expected cash flows, market conditions and other future
events that are highly subjective in nature and subject to change. These fair value estimates are
considered preliminary, and are subject to change for up to one year after the closing date of the
acquisition as additional information relative to closing date fair values becomes available.
Centennial Bank and the FDIC are engaged in on-going discussions that may impact which assets and
liabilities are ultimately acquired or assumed by Centennial Bank and/or the purchase prices. In
addition, the tax treatment of the FDIC assisted acquisition is complex and subject to
interpretations that may result in future adjustments of deferred taxes as of the acquisition date.
Centennial Bank did not acquire the real estate, banking facilities, furniture and equipment
of Old Southern as part of the purchase and assumption agreement but has the option to purchase
these assets at fair market value from the FDIC. This purchase option expires 90 days after
acquisition date. Fair market values for the real estate, facilities, furniture and equipment will
be based on current appraisals and determined at a later date. Centennial Bank is leasing these
facilities and equipment from the FDIC until current appraisals are received and a final decision
is made.
12
Table of Contents
Old Southern | ||||||||||||
Acquired from | Fair Value | As Recorded | ||||||||||
the FDIC | Adjustments | by HBI | ||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||
Assets |
||||||||||||
Cash and due from banks |
$ | 1,759 | $ | 30,675 | $ | 32,434 | ||||||
Interest-bearing deposits with other banks |
16,563 | | 16,563 | |||||||||
Investment securities |
30,401 | | 30,401 | |||||||||
Federal funds sold |
3,079 | | 3,079 | |||||||||
Loans receivable covered by loss share |
273,166 | (94,101 | ) | 179,065 | ||||||||
Total loans receivable |
273,166 | (94,101 | ) | 179,065 | ||||||||
Bank premises and equipment, net |
44 | | 44 | |||||||||
Foreclosed assets held for sale covered by loss share |
8,781 | (5,821 | ) | 2,960 | ||||||||
FDIC indemnification asset |
| 76,000 | 76,000 | |||||||||
Core deposit intangibles |
| 2,400 | 2,400 | |||||||||
Other assets |
1,505 | 633 | 2,138 | |||||||||
Total assets acquired |
$ | 335,298 | $ | 9,786 | $ | 345,084 | ||||||
Liabilities |
||||||||||||
Deposits |
||||||||||||
Demand and non-interest-bearing |
$ | 25,178 | $ | | $ | 25,178 | ||||||
Savings and interest-bearing transaction accounts |
124,071 | | 124,071 | |||||||||
Time deposits |
179,208 | | 179,208 | |||||||||
Total deposits |
328,457 | | 328,457 | |||||||||
Accrued interest payable and other liabilities |
375 | 6,535 | 6,910 | |||||||||
Total liabilities assumed |
$ | 328,832 | $ | 6,535 | $ | 335,367 | ||||||
Gain on acquisition |
$ | 9,717 | ||||||||||
The following is a description of the methods used to determine the fair values of significant
assets and liabilities presented above.
Cash and due from banks, interest-bearing deposits with other banks and federal funds
sold The carrying amount of these assets is a reasonable estimate of fair value based on the
short-term nature of these assets. The $30.7 million adjustment is the first proforma cash
settlement received from the FDIC on Monday following the closing weekend.
Investment Securities Investment securities were acquired from the FDIC at fair
market value.
Loans Fair values for loans were based on a discounted cash flow methodology that
considered factors including the type of loan and related collateral, classification status, fixed
or variable interest rate, term of loan and whether or not the loan was amortizing, and current
discount rates. The discount rates used for loans are based on current market rates for new
originations of comparable loans and include adjustments for liquidity concerns. The discount rate
does not include a factor for credit losses as that has been included in the estimated cash flows.
Core deposit intangible This intangible asset represents the value of the
relationships that Old Southern had with its deposit customers. The fair value of this intangible
asset was estimated based on a discounted cash flow methodology that gave appropriate consideration
to expected customer attrition rates, cost of the deposit base, and the net maintenance cost
attributable to customer deposits.
Foreclosed assets held for sale These assets are presented at the estimated present
values that management expects to receive when the properties are sold, net of related costs of
disposal.
13
Table of Contents
FDIC indemnification asset This loss sharing asset is measured separately from the
related covered assets as it is not contractually embedded in the covered assets and is not
transferable with the covered assets should Centennial Bank choose to dispose of them. Fair value
was estimated using projected cash flows related to the loss sharing agreements based on the
expected reimbursements for losses and the applicable loss sharing percentages. These cash flows
were discounted to reflect the uncertainty of the timing and receipt of the loss-sharing
reimbursement from the FDIC.
Deposits The fair values used for the demand and savings deposits that comprise the
transaction accounts acquired, by definition equal the amount payable on demand at the acquisition
date. No fair value adjustment was applied for time deposits as the Bank was able to reset deposit
rates to market rates currently offered.
The Companys operating results for the period ended March 31, 2010, include the operating
results of the acquired assets and assumed liabilities for the 19 days subsequent to the March 12,
2010 acquisition date. Due to the significant fair value adjustments recorded, as well as the
nature of the FDIC loss sharing agreement in place, Old Southerns historical results are not
believed to be relevant to the Companys results, and thus no pro forma information is presented.
Acquisition Key West Bank
On March 26, 2010, Centennial Bank, entered into separate purchase and assumption agreements
(Key West Bank Agreement) with the FDIC, as receiver, pursuant to which Centennial Bank acquired
certain assets and assumed substantially all of the deposits and certain liabilities of Key West
Bank (Key West).
Prior to the acquisition, Key West operated one banking center located in Key West, Florida.
Excluding the effects of purchase accounting adjustments, Centennial Bank acquired $96.8 million in
assets and assumed approximately $66.7 million of the deposits of Key West. Additionally,
Centennial Bank purchased loans with an estimated fair value of $46.9 million, $5.7 million of
foreclosed assets and assumed $20.0 million of FHLB advances.
In connection with the Key West acquisition, Centennial Bank entered into loss-sharing
agreements with the FDIC that collectively cover approximately $72.7 million of assets, based upon
the sellers records, which include single family residential mortgage loans, commercial real
estate, commercial and industrial loans and foreclosed assets (covered assets). Centennial Bank
acquired other Key West assets that are not covered by loss sharing agreements with the FDIC
including interest-bearing deposits with other banks and other tangible assets. Pursuant to the
terms of the loss sharing agreements, the covered assets of Key West are subject to a stated loss
threshold of $23.0 million whereby the FDIC will reimburse Centennial Bank for 80% of losses of up
to $23.0 million, and 95% of losses in excess of this amount. Centennial Bank will reimburse the
FDIC for its share of recoveries with respect to losses for which the FDIC paid Centennial Bank a
reimbursement under the loss sharing agreements. The FDICs obligation to reimburse Centennial Bank
for losses with respect to covered assets begins with the first dollar of loss incurred.
The amounts covered by the loss sharing agreements are the pre-acquisition book values of the
underlying covered assets, the contractual balance of unfunded commitments that were acquired, and
certain future net direct costs. The loss sharing agreements applicable to single family
residential mortgage loans provide for FDIC loss sharing and Centennial Bank reimbursement to the
FDIC, in each case as described above, for ten years. The loss sharing agreements applicable to all
other covered assets provide for FDIC loss sharing for five years and Centennial Bank reimbursement
of recoveries to the FDIC for eight years, in each case as described above.
The loss sharing agreement is subject to certain servicing procedures as specified in
agreements with the FDIC. The expected reimbursements under the loss sharing agreements were
recorded as indemnification assets at their estimated fair values of $12.2 million for the Key West
Agreement, on the acquisition date. The indemnification assets reflect the present value of the
expected net cash reimbursement related to the loss sharing agreements described above.
14
Table of Contents
Centennial Bank has determined that the acquisition of the net assets of Key West constitute a
business combination as defined by the FASB ASC Topic 805, Business Combinations. Accordingly, the
assets acquired and liabilities assumed are presented at their fair values as required. Fair values
were determined based on the requirements of FASB ASC Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements. In many
cases, the determination of these fair values required management to make estimates about discount
rates, future expected cash flows, market conditions and other future events that are highly
subjective in nature and subject to change. These fair value estimates are considered preliminary,
and are subject to change for up to one year after the closing date of the acquisition as
additional information relative to closing date fair values becomes available. Centennial Bank and
the FDIC are engaged in on-going discussions that may impact which assets and liabilities are
ultimately acquired or assumed by Centennial Bank and/or the purchase prices. In addition, the tax
treatment of the FDIC assisted acquisition is complex and subject to interpretations that may
result in future adjustments of deferred taxes as of the acquisition date.
Centennial Bank did not acquire the real estate, banking facilities, furniture and equipment
of Key West as part of the purchase and assumption agreement but has the option to purchase these
assets at fair market value from the FDIC. This purchase option expires 90 days after acquisition
date. Fair market values for the real estate, facilities, furniture and equipment will be based on
current appraisals and determined at a later date. Centennial Bank is leasing these facilities and
equipment from the FDIC until current appraisals are received and a final decision is made.
Key West | ||||||||||||
Acquired from | Fair Value | As Recorded | ||||||||||
the FDIC | Adjustments | by HBI | ||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||
Assets |
||||||||||||
Cash and due from banks |
$ | 1,592 | $ | | $ | 1,592 | ||||||
Interest-bearing deposits with other banks |
21,063 | | 21,063 | |||||||||
Loans receivable covered by loss share |
65,256 | (18,315 | ) | 46,941 | ||||||||
Total loans receivable |
65,256 | (18,315 | ) | 46,941 | ||||||||
Foreclosed assets held for sale covered by loss share |
7,412 | (1,700 | ) | 5,712 | ||||||||
FDIC indemnification asset |
| 12,200 | 12,200 | |||||||||
Core deposit intangible |
| 370 | 370 | |||||||||
Other assets |
1,438 | 276 | 1,714 | |||||||||
Total assets acquired |
$ | 96,761 | $ | (7,169 | ) | $ | 89,592 | |||||
Liabilities |
||||||||||||
Deposits |
||||||||||||
Demand and non-interest-bearing |
$ | 4,357 | $ | | $ | 4,357 | ||||||
Savings and interest-bearing transaction accounts |
5,543 | | 5,543 | |||||||||
Time deposits |
56,846 | | 56,846 | |||||||||
Total deposits |
66,746 | | 66,746 | |||||||||
FHLB borrowed funds |
20,010 | | 20,010 | |||||||||
Accrued interest payable and other liabilities |
593 | 170 | 763 | |||||||||
Total liabilities assumed |
$ | 87,349 | $ | 170 | $ | 87,519 | ||||||
Gain on acquisition |
$ | 2,073 | ||||||||||
The following is a description of the methods used to determine the fair values of significant
assets and liabilities presented above.
Cash and due from banks and interest-bearing deposits with other banks The carrying
amount of these assets is a reasonable estimate of fair value based on the short-term nature of
these assets.
15
Table of Contents
Loans Fair values for loans were based on a discounted cash flow methodology
that considered factors including the type of loan and related collateral, classification status,
fixed or variable interest rate, term of loan and whether or not the loan was amortizing, and
current discount rates. The discount rates used for loans are based on current market rates for
new originations of comparable loans and include adjustments for liquidity concerns. The discount
rate does not include a factor for credit losses as that has been included in the estimated cash
flows.
Core deposit intangible This intangible asset represents the value of the
relationships that Key West had with its deposit customers. The fair value of this intangible asset
was estimated based on a discounted cash flow methodology that gave appropriate consideration to
expected customer attrition rates, cost of the deposit base, and the net maintenance cost
attributable to customer deposits.
Foreclosed assets held for sale These assets are presented at the estimated present
values that management expects to receive when the properties are sold, net of related costs of
disposal.
FDIC indemnification asset This loss sharing asset is measured separately from the
related covered assets as it is not contractually embedded in the covered assets and is not
transferable with the covered assets should Centennial Bank choose to dispose of them. Fair value
was estimated using projected cash flows related to the loss sharing agreements based on the
expected reimbursements for losses and the applicable loss sharing percentages. These cash flows
were discounted to reflect the uncertainty of the timing and receipt of the loss sharing
reimbursement from the FDIC.
Deposits The fair values used for the demand and savings deposits that comprise the
transaction accounts acquired, by definition equal the amount payable on demand at the acquisition
date. No fair value adjustment was applied for time deposits because the weighted average interest
rate of Key Wests CDs were at the market rates of similar funding at the time of acquisition.
The Companys operating results for the period ended March 31, 2010, include the operating
results of the acquired assets and assumed liabilities for the 5 days subsequent to the March 26,
2010 acquisition date. Due to the significant fair value adjustments recorded, as well as the
nature of the FDIC loss sharing agreement in place, Key Wests historical results are not believed
to be relevant to the Companys results, and thus no pro forma information is presented.
3. Investment Securities
The amortized cost and estimated market value of investment securities were as follows:
March 31, 2010 | ||||||||||||||||
Available for Sale | ||||||||||||||||
Gross Unrealized | Gross Unrealized | Estimated | ||||||||||||||
Amortized Cost | Gains | (Losses) | Fair Value | |||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
U.S. government-sponsored enterprises |
$ | 101,825 | $ | 131 | $ | (260 | ) | $ | 101,696 | |||||||
Mortgage-backed securities |
105,837 | 2,920 | (1,270 | ) | 107,487 | |||||||||||
State and political subdivisions |
147,651 | 2,439 | (1,006 | ) | 149,084 | |||||||||||
Other securities |
5,778 | | (1,335 | ) | 4,443 | |||||||||||
Total |
$ | 361,091 | $ | 5,490 | $ | (3,871 | ) | $ | 362,710 | |||||||
16
Table of Contents
December 31, 2009 | ||||||||||||||||
Available for Sale | ||||||||||||||||
Gross Unrealized | Gross Unrealized | Estimated | ||||||||||||||
Amortized Cost | Gains | (Losses) | Fair Value | |||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
U.S. government-sponsored enterprises |
$ | 56,439 | $ | 130 | $ | (463 | ) | $ | 56,106 | |||||||
Mortgage-backed securities |
114,464 | 2,813 | (1,690 | ) | 115,587 | |||||||||||
State and political subdivisions |
145,086 | 2,224 | (1,375 | ) | 145,935 | |||||||||||
Other securities |
5,837 | | (1,350 | ) | 4,487 | |||||||||||
Total |
$ | 321,826 | $ | 5,167 | $ | (4,878 | ) | $ | 322,115 | |||||||
Assets, principally investment securities, having a carrying value of approximately $288.2
million and $231.3 million at March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively, were pledged to
secure public deposits and for other purposes required or permitted by law. Also, investment
securities pledged as collateral for repurchase agreements totaled approximately $55.4 million and
$62.0 million at March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively.
During the three-month periods ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, no available for sale securities
were sold.
The amortized cost and estimated fair value of securities at March 31, 2010, by contractual
maturity, are shown below. Expected maturities will differ from contractual maturities because
borrowers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment
penalties.
Available-for-Sale | ||||||||
Amortized | Estimated | |||||||
Cost | Fair Value | |||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Due in one year or less |
$ | 122,359 | $ | 121,552 | ||||
Due after one year through five years |
165,537 | 167,959 | ||||||
Due after five years through ten years |
46,420 | 46,589 | ||||||
Due after ten years |
26,775 | 26,610 | ||||||
Total |
$ | 361,091 | $ | 362,710 | ||||
For purposes of the maturity tables, mortgage-backed securities, which are not due at a single
maturity date, have been allocated over maturity groupings based on anticipated maturities. The
mortgage-backed securities may mature earlier than their weighted-average contractual maturities
because of principal prepayments.
The Company evaluates all securities quarterly to determine if any unrealized losses are
deemed to be other than temporary. In completing these evaluations the Company follows the
requirements of FASB ASC 320, Investments Debt and Equity Securities. Certain investment
securities are valued less than their historical cost. These declines are primarily the result of
the rate for these investments yielding less than current market rates. Based on evaluation of
available evidence, management believes the declines in fair value for these securities are
temporary. The Company does not intend to sell or believe it will be required to sell these
investments before recovery of their amortized cost bases, which may be maturity. Should the
impairment of any of these securities become other than temporary, the cost basis of the investment
will be reduced and the resulting loss recognized in net income in the period the
other-than-temporary impairment is identified.
17
Table of Contents
No securities were deemed by management to have other-than-temporary impairment for the three
month periods ended March 31, 2010, besides securities for which impairment was taken in prior
periods.
For the period ended March 31, 2010, the Company had $3.5 million in unrealized losses, which
have been in continuous loss positions for more than twelve months. Included in the $3.5 million in
unrealized losses are $1.3 million in unrealized losses, which were associated with
government-sponsored securities and government-sponsored mortgage-back securities. Excluding
impairment write downs taken in prior periods, the Companys assessments indicated that the cause
of the market depreciation was primarily the change in interest rates and not the issuers
financial condition, or downgrades by rating agencies. In addition, approximately 79.7% of the
Companys investment portfolio matures in five years or less. As a result, the Company has the
ability and intent to hold such securities until maturity.
The following shows gross unrealized losses and estimated fair value of investment securities
available for sale aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual investment
securities have been in a continuous loss position as of the periods ended March 31, 2010 and
December 31, 2009:
March 31, 2010 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Less Than 12 Months | 12 Months or More | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Fair | Unrealized | Fair | Unrealized | Fair | Unrealized | |||||||||||||||||||
Value | Losses | Value | Losses | Value | Losses | |||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. Government-sponsored
enterprises |
$ | 45,204 | $ | (260 | ) | $ | | $ | | $ | 45,204 | $ | (260 | ) | ||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities |
1,681 | (2 | ) | 6,193 | (1,268 | ) | 7,874 | (1,270 | ) | |||||||||||||||
State and political subdivisions |
9,903 | (90 | ) | 17,180 | (916 | ) | 27,083 | (1,006 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Other securities |
| | 1,405 | (1,335 | ) | 1,405 | (1,335 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 56,788 | $ | (352 | ) | $ | 24,778 | $ | (3,519 | ) | $ | 81,566 | $ | (3,871 | ) | |||||||||
December 31, 2009 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Less Than 12 Months | 12 Months or More | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Fair | Unrealized | Fair | Unrealized | Fair | Unrealized | |||||||||||||||||||
Value | Losses | Value | Losses | Value | Losses | |||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. Government-sponsored
enterprises |
$ | 41,078 | $ | (463 | ) | $ | | $ | | $ | 41,078 | $ | (463 | ) | ||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities |
10,837 | (205 | ) | 4,411 | (1,485 | ) | 15,248 | (1,690 | ) | |||||||||||||||
State and political subdivisions |
10,647 | (146 | ) | 17,957 | (1,229 | ) | 28,604 | (1,375 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Other securities |
| | 1,562 | (1,350 | ) | 1,562 | (1,350 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 62,562 | $ | (814 | ) | $ | 23,930 | $ | (4,064 | ) | $ | 86,492 | $ | ( 4,878 | ) | |||||||||
18
Table of Contents
4: Loans Receivable Not Covered by Loss Share and Allowance for Loan Losses
The various categories of loans not covered by loss share are summarized as follows:
March 31, | December 31, | |||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Real estate: |
||||||||
Commercial real estate loans |
||||||||
Non-farm/non-residential |
$ | 822,252 | $ | 808,983 | ||||
Construction/land development |
363,738 | 368,723 | ||||||
Agricultural |
30,943 | 33,699 | ||||||
Residential real estate loans |
||||||||
Residential 1-4 family |
381,451 | 382,504 | ||||||
Multifamily residential |
63,602 | 62,609 | ||||||
Total real estate |
1,661,986 | 1,656,518 | ||||||
Consumer |
33,206 | 39,084 | ||||||
Commercial and industrial |
231,867 | 219,847 | ||||||
Agricultural |
12,122 | 10,280 | ||||||
Other |
20,485 | 24,556 | ||||||
Loans receivable not covered by loss share |
1,959,666 | 1,950,285 | ||||||
The following is a summary of activity within the allowance for loan losses:
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Balance, beginning of year |
$ | 42,968 | $ | 40,385 | ||||
Additions |
||||||||
Provision charged to expense |
3,100 | 1,000 | ||||||
Net loans charged off |
||||||||
Losses charged to
allowance, net of
recoveries of $497
and $452 for the first
three months of 2010 and
2009, respectively |
3,223 | 563 | ||||||
Balance, March 31 |
$ | 42,845 | 40,822 | |||||
Additions |
||||||||
Provision charged to expense |
10,150 | |||||||
Net loans charged off |
||||||||
Losses charged to
allowance, net of
recoveries of $1,450
for the last nine
months of 2009 |
8,004 | |||||||
Balance, end of year |
$ | 42,968 | ||||||
At March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, accruing loans not covered by loss share delinquent
90 days or more totaled $3.9 million and $2.9 million, respectively. Non-accruing loans not
covered by loss share at March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 were $33.9 million and $37.1 million,
respectively.
The Company did not sell any of the guaranteed portions of SBA loans during the first quarter
of 2010 or 2009.
19
Table of Contents
Mortgage loans held for sale of approximately $5.4 million and $4.8 million at March 31, 2010
and December 31, 2009, respectively, are included in residential 1-4 family loans. Mortgage loans
held for sale are carried at the lower of cost or fair value, determined using an aggregate basis.
Gains and losses resulting from sales of mortgage loans are recognized when the respective loans
are sold to investors. Gains and losses are determined by the difference between the selling price
and the carrying amount of the loans sold, net of discounts collected or paid. The Company obtains
forward commitments to sell mortgage loans to reduce market risk on mortgage loans in the process
of origination and mortgage loans held for sale. The forward commitments acquired by the Company
for mortgage loans in process of origination are not mandatory forward commitments. These
commitments are structured on a best efforts basis; therefore the Company is not required to
substitute another loan or to buy back the commitment if the original loan does not fund.
Typically, the Company delivers the mortgage loans within a few days after the loans are funded.
These commitments are derivative instruments and their fair values at March 31, 2010 and December
31, 2009 were not material.
At March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, non-covered impaired loans totaled $51.9 million and
$44.4 million, respectively. As of March 31, 2010 and 2009, average non-covered impaired loans were
$48.2 million and $36.0 million, respectively. All non-covered impaired loans had designated
reserves for possible loan losses. Reserves relative to non-covered impaired loans were $20.7
million and $16.6 million at March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively. Interest
recognized on non-covered impaired loans during the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 was
approximately $573,000 and $663,000, respectively.
5: Loans Receivable Covered by FDIC Loss Share
The Company evaluated loans purchased in conjunction with the acquisitions of Old Southern and
Key West described in Note 2, Business Combinations, for impairment in accordance with the
provisions of FASB ASC Topic 310-30, Loans and Debt Securities Acquired with Deteriorated Credit
Quality. Purchased covered loans are considered impaired if there is evidence of credit
deterioration since origination and if it is probable that not all contractually required payments
will be collected. The following table reflects the carrying value of all purchased covered
impaired loans as of March 31, 2010 for both the Old Southern and Key West FDIC-assisted
transactions:
Loans | ||||
Receivable | ||||
Covered | ||||
by FDIC | ||||
Loss Share | ||||
(In thousands) | ||||
Real estate: |
||||
Commercial real estate loans |
||||
Non-farm/non-residential |
$ | 77,787 | ||
Construction/land development |
72,133 | |||
Agricultural |
2,895 | |||
Residential real estate loans |
||||
Residential 1-4 family |
43,885 | |||
Multifamily residential |
8,119 | |||
Total real estate |
204,819 | |||
Consumer |
347 | |||
Commercial and industrial |
20,719 | |||
Agricultural |
| |||
Other |
| |||
Total loans receivable covered by FDIC loss share (1) |
$ | 225,885 | ||
(1) | These loans were not classified as nonperforming assets at March 31, 2010 as the loans are accounted for on a pooled basis and the pools are considered to be performing. Therefore, interest income, through accretion of the difference between the carrying amount of the loans and the expected cash flows, is being recognized on all purchased impaired loans. |
20
Table of Contents
The acquired loans were grouped into pools based on common risk characteristics and were
recorded at their estimated fair values, which incorporated estimated credit losses at the
acquisition dates. These loan pools are systematically reviewed by the Company to determine the
risk of losses that may exceed those identified at the time of the acquisition. Techniques used in
determining risk of loss are similar to the Centennial Bank non-covered loan portfolio, with most
focus being placed on those loan pools which include the larger loan relationships and those loan
pools which exhibit higher risk characteristics.
The following is a summary of the covered impaired loans acquired in the acquisitions during
2010 as of the dates of acquisition.
Old Southern | Key West | |||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Contractually required principal and interest at acquisitions |
$ | 301,797 | $ | 100,146 | ||||
Non-accretable difference (expected losses and foregone interest) |
(93,930 | ) | (32,699 | ) | ||||
Cash flows expected to be collected at acquisition |
207,867 | 67,447 | ||||||
Accretable yield |
(28,802 | ) | (20,506 | ) | ||||
Basis in acquired loans at acquisition |
$ | 179,065 | $ | 46,941 | ||||
As of the respective acquisition dates, the preliminary estimates of contractually required
payments receivable, including interest, for all covered impaired loans acquired in the Old
Southern and Key West transactions were $407.9 million. The cash flows expected to be collected as
of the acquisition dates for these loans were $275.3 million, including interest. These amounts
were determined based upon the estimated remaining life of the underlying loans, which includes the
effects of estimated prepayments.
Changes in the carrying amount of the accretable yield for purchased impaired and non-impaired
loans were not deemed material for the three months ended March 31, 2010 for both Old Southern and
Key West.
There were no allowances for loan losses related to the purchased impaired loans at March 31,
2010.
Due to the short time period between the execution of the respective purchase and assumption
agreements and March 31, 2010, certain amounts related to the purchased impaired loans are
preliminary estimates. Additionally, Centennial Bank and the FDIC are engaged in on-going
discussions that may impact which assets and liabilities are ultimately acquired or assumed by
Centennial Bank and/or the purchase prices. The estimated fair values for the purchased impaired
loans were based upon the FDICs estimated data for excluded loans. Centennial Bank anticipates the
final determination of the excluded loans will be completed in the second quarter of 2010 and
expects to finalize its analysis of these loans when this occurs.
21
Table of Contents
6: Goodwill and Core Deposits and Other Intangibles
Changes in the carrying amount and accumulated amortization of the Companys goodwill and core
deposits and other intangibles for the three-month period ended March 31, 2010 and for the year
ended December 31, 2009, were as follows:
March 31, | December 31, | |||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Goodwill |
||||||||
Balance, beginning of period |
$ | 53,039 | $ | 50,038 | ||||
Acquisition of Centennial Bancshares, Inc. |
| 3,100 | ||||||
Charter consolidation |
| (99 | ) | |||||
Balance, end of period |
$ | 53,039 | $ | 53,039 | ||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Core Deposit and Other Intangibles |
||||||||
Balance, beginning of period |
$ | 4,698 | $ | 6,547 | ||||
FDIC-assisted acquisitions |
2,770 | | ||||||
Amortization expense |
(479 | ) | (463 | ) | ||||
Balance, March 31 |
$ | 6,989 | 6,084 | |||||
Amortization expense |
(1,386 | ) | ||||||
Balance, end of year |
$ | 4,698 | ||||||
The carrying basis and accumulated amortization of core deposits and other intangibles at
March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 were:
March 31, | December 31, | |||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Gross carrying amount |
$ | 16,921 | $ | 14,151 | ||||
Accumulated amortization |
9,932 | 9,453 | ||||||
Net carrying amount |
$ | 6,989 | $ | 4,698 | ||||
Core deposit and other intangible amortization was approximately $479,000 and $463,000 for
each of the three-months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009. Including all of the mergers completed,
HBIs estimated amortization expense of core deposits and other intangibles for each of the years
2010 through 2014 is: 2010 $2.2 million; 2011 $1.5 million; 2012 $1.1 million; 2013 $1.1
million; and 2014 $953,000.
Goodwill is tested annually for impairment during the fourth quarter. If the implied fair
value of goodwill is lower than its carrying amount, goodwill impairment is indicated and goodwill
is written down to its implied fair value. Subsequent increases in goodwill value are not
recognized in the financial statements.
7: Deposits
The aggregate amount of time deposits with a minimum denomination of $100,000 was $336.1
million and $482.6 million at March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively. Interest expense
applicable to certificates in excess of $100,000 totaled $2.4 million and $3.6 million for the
three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. As of March 31, 2010 and December 31,
2009, brokered deposits were $53.9 million and $71.0 million, respectively.
22
Table of Contents
Deposits totaling approximately $238.7 million and $206.6 million at March 31, 2010 and
December 31, 2009, respectively, were public funds obtained primarily from state and political
subdivisions in the United States.
8: Securities Sold Under Agreements to Repurchase
From time to time, primarily as a short-term financing arrangement for investment or liquidity
purposes, the Company has entered into repurchase agreements with certain business customers. This
involves the selling of one or more of the securities in the Companys investment portfolio and
by entering into an agreement to repurchase that same security at an agreed upon later date. A
rate of interest is paid by the Company for the subject period of time. At March 31, 2010 and
December 31, 2009, securities sold under agreements to repurchase totaled $55.4 million and $62.0
million, respectively.
9: FHLB Borrowed Funds
The Companys FHLB borrowed funds were $254.5 million and $264.4 million at March 31, 2010 and
December 31, 2009, respectively. All of the outstanding balance for March 31, 2010 and December 31,
2009 includes long-term advances. The FHLB advances mature from the current year to 2025 with fixed
interest rates ranging from 2.020% to 5.076% and are secured by loans and investments
securities. As of March 31, 2010, the Company has four short-term rate advances
associated with the Key West Acquisition with a rates ranging from 0.46% to 0.90%. Expected
maturities will differ from contractual maturities, because FHLB may have the right to call or
prepay certain obligations.
10: Subordinated Debentures
Subordinated Debentures at March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 consisted of guaranteed
payments on trust preferred securities with the following components:
March 31, | December 31, | |||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Subordinated debentures, issued in 2003, due 2033,
fixed
at 6.40%, during the first five years and at a floating
rate
of 3.15% above the three-month LIBOR rate, reset
quarterly, thereafter, currently callable without penalty |
$ | 20,619 | $ | 20,619 | ||||
Subordinated debentures, issued in 2000, due 2030, fixed
at 10.60%, callable in 2010 with a penalty ranging from
5.30% to 0.53% depending on the year of prepayment,
callable in 2020 without penalty |
3,130 | 3,152 | ||||||
Subordinated debentures, issued in 2003, due 2033,
floating rate of 3.15% above the three-month LIBOR
rate, reset quarterly, currently callable without penalty |
5,155 | 5,155 | ||||||
Subordinated debentures, issued in 2005, due 2035, fixed
rate of 6.81% during the first ten years and at a
floating
rate of 1.38% above the three-month LIBOR rate, reset
quarterly, thereafter, callable in 2010 without penalty |
15,465 | 15,465 | ||||||
Subordinated debentures, issued in 2006, due 2036, fixed
rate of 6.75% during the first five years and at a
floating
rate of 1.85% above the three-month LIBOR rate, reset
quarterly, thereafter, callable in 2011 without penalty |
3,093 | 3,093 | ||||||
Total subordinated debt |
$ | 47,462 | $ | 47,484 | ||||
23
Table of Contents
The trust preferred securities are tax-advantaged issues that qualify for Tier 1 capital
treatment subject to certain limitations. Distributions on these securities are included in
interest expense. Each of the trusts is a statutory business trust organized for the sole purpose
of issuing trust securities and investing the proceeds thereof in junior subordinated debentures of
the Company, the sole asset of each trust. The preferred trust securities of each trust represent
preferred beneficial interests in the assets of the respective trusts and are subject to mandatory
redemption upon payment of the junior subordinated debentures held by the trust. The Company wholly
owns the common securities of each trust. Each trusts ability to pay amounts due on the trust
preferred securities is solely dependent upon the Company making payment on the related junior
subordinated debentures. The Companys obligations under the junior subordinated securities and
other relevant trust agreements, in aggregate, constitute a full and unconditional guarantee by the
Company of each respective trusts obligations under the trust securities issued by each respective
trust.
Presently, the funds raised from the trust preferred offerings qualify as Tier 1 capital for
regulatory purposes, subject to the applicable limit, with the balance qualifying as Tier 2
capital.
The Company holds two trust preferred securities which are currently callable without penalty
based on the terms of the specific agreements. The 2009 agreement between the Company and the
Treasury limits our ability to retire any of our qualifying capital. As a result, the notes
previously mentioned are not currently eligible to be paid off.
11: Income Taxes
The following is a summary of the components of the provision for income taxes for the
three-month period ended March 31:
Three Months Ended March 31, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Current: |
||||||||
Federal |
$ | 3,142 | $ | 3,422 | ||||
State |
645 | 648 | ||||||
Total current |
3,787 | 4,070 | ||||||
Deferred: |
||||||||
Federal |
3,523 | (986 | ) | |||||
State |
661 | (195 | ) | |||||
Total deferred |
4,184 | (1,181 | ) | |||||
Provision for income taxes |
$ | 7,971 | $ | 2,889 | ||||
The reconciliation between the statutory federal income tax rate and effective income tax rate
is as follows for the three-month period ended March 31:
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Statutory federal income tax rate |
35.00 | % | 35.00 | % | ||||
Effect of nontaxable interest income |
(2.55 | ) | (5.13 | ) | ||||
Cash value of life insurance |
(0.67 | ) | (1.83 | ) | ||||
State income taxes, net of federal benefit |
3.80 | 3.22 | ||||||
Other |
0.09 | 0.37 | ||||||
Effective income tax rate |
35.67 | % | 31.63 | % | ||||
24
Table of Contents
The types of temporary differences between the tax basis of assets and liabilities and their
financial reporting amounts that give rise to deferred income tax assets and liabilities, and their
approximate tax effects, are as follows:
March 31, | December 31, | |||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Deferred tax assets: |
||||||||
Allowance for loan losses |
$ | 16,567 | $ | 16,760 | ||||
Deferred compensation |
882 | 937 | ||||||
Stock options |
405 | 389 | ||||||
Non-accrual interest income |
1,228 | 1,115 | ||||||
Impairment of investment securities |
39 | 39 | ||||||
Real estate owned |
503 | 504 | ||||||
Unrealized loss on securities |
| | ||||||
Net operating loss carryforward |
| | ||||||
Other |
698 | 633 | ||||||
Gross deferred tax assets |
20,322 | 20,377 | ||||||
Deferred tax liabilities: |
||||||||
Accelerated depreciation on
premises and equipment |
2,325 | 2,501 | ||||||
Unrealized gain on securities |
635 | 114 | ||||||
Core deposit intangibles |
1,621 | 1,823 | ||||||
Gain on acquisition |
4,625 | | ||||||
FHLB dividends |
855 | 850 | ||||||
Other |
189 | 312 | ||||||
Gross deferred tax liabilities |
10,250 | 5,600 | ||||||
Net deferred tax assets |
$ | 10,072 | $ | 14,777 | ||||
12: Common Stock and Stock Compensation Plans
In
September 2009, the Company raised common equity through an underwritten public
offering by issuing 4,950,000 shares of common stock at $19.85. The net proceeds of the offering
after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and offering expenses were $93.3 million. In
October 2009, the underwriters of our stock offering exercised and completed their option to
purchase an additional 742,500 shares of common stock at $19.85 to cover over-allotments. The net
proceeds of the exercise of the over-allotment option after deducting underwriting discounts and
commissions were $14.0 million. The total net proceeds of the offering after deducting underwriting
discounts and commissions and offering expenses were $107.3 million.
On January 16, 2009, we issued and sold, and the United States Department of the Treasury
purchased, (1) 50,000 shares of the Companys Fixed Rate Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock
Series A, liquidation preference of $1,000 per share, and (2) a ten-year warrant to purchase up to
288,129 shares of the Companys common stock, par value $0.01 per share, at an exercise price of
$26.03 per share, for an aggregate purchase price of $50.0 million in cash. Cumulative dividends on
the Preferred Shares will accrue on the liquidation preference at a rate of 5% per annum for the
first five years, and at a rate of 9% per annum thereafter. As a result of the recent public stock
offering, the number of shares of common stock underlying the ten-year warrant held by the
Treasury, has been reduced by half to 144,065 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of
$26.03 per share.
These preferred shares will qualify as Tier 1 capital. The preferred shares will be callable
at par after three years. Prior to the end of three years, the preferred shares may be redeemed
with the proceeds from a qualifying equity offering of any Tier 1 perpetual preferred or common
stock. The Treasury must approve any quarterly cash dividend on our common stock above $0.06 per
share or share repurchases until three years from the date of the investment unless the shares are
paid off in whole or transferred to a third party.
25
Table of Contents
Stock Compensation Plans
The Company has a stock option and performance incentive plan. The purpose of the plan is to
attract and retain highly qualified officers, directors, key employees, and other persons, and to
motivate those persons to improve our business results. This plan provides for the granting of
incentive nonqualified options to purchase up to 1,620,000 of common stock in the Company.
Total unrecognized compensation cost, net of income tax benefit, related to non-vested awards,
which are expected to be recognized over the vesting periods, is approximately $76,000 as of March
31, 2010. The intrinsic value of the stock options outstanding and stock options vested at March
31, 2010 was $11.2 million and $10.9 million, respectively. The intrinsic value of the stock
options exercised during the three-month period ended March 31, 2010 was approximately $118,000.
The table below summarized the transactions under the Companys stock option plans at March
31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 and changes during the three-month period and year then ended,
respectively:
For the Three Months Ended | For the Year Ended | |||||||||||||||
March 31, 2010 | December 31, 2009 | |||||||||||||||
Weighted | Weighted | |||||||||||||||
Average | Average | |||||||||||||||
Exercisable | Exercisable | |||||||||||||||
Shares (000) | Price | Shares (000) | Price | |||||||||||||
Outstanding, beginning of year |
759 | $ | 11.51 | 1,069 | $ | 11.72 | ||||||||||
Granted |
| | | | ||||||||||||
Forfeited/Expired |
| | 183 | 13.12 | ||||||||||||
Exercised |
8 | 10.92 | 127 | 10.95 | ||||||||||||
Outstanding, end of period |
751 | 11.52 | 759 | 11.51 | ||||||||||||
Exercisable, end of period |
711 | $ | 11.05 | 708 | $ | 10.92 | ||||||||||
Stock-based compensation expense for all stock-based compensation awards granted after January
1, 2006, is based on the grant date fair value. For stock option awards, the fair value is
estimated at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. This model requires
the input of highly subjective assumptions, changes to which can materially affect the fair value
estimate. Additionally, there may be other factors that would otherwise have a significant effect
on the value of employee stock options granted but are not considered by the model. Accordingly,
while management believes that the Black-Scholes option-pricing model provides a reasonable
estimate of fair value, the model does not necessarily provide the best single measure of fair
value for the Companys employee stock options. There were no options granted during the
three-months ended March 31, 2010. There were no options granted during the year-ended December 31,
2009. The fair value of each option granted is estimated on the date of grant using the
Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions:
For the Three Months Ended | For the Year Ended | |||
March 31, 2010 | December 31, 2009 | |||
Expected dividend yield
|
Not applicable | Not applicable | ||
Expected stock price volatility
|
Not applicable | Not applicable | ||
Risk-free interest rate
|
Not applicable | Not applicable | ||
Expected life of options
|
Not applicable | Not applicable |
26
Table of Contents
The following is a summary of currently outstanding and exercisable options at March 31, 2010:
Options Outstanding | Options Exercisable | |||||||||||||||||||
Weighted- | ||||||||||||||||||||
Average | ||||||||||||||||||||
Remaining | Weighted- | Weighted- | ||||||||||||||||||
Options | Contractual | Average | Options | Average | ||||||||||||||||
Outstanding | Life (in | Exercise | Exercisable | Exercise | ||||||||||||||||
Exercise Prices | Shares (000) | years) | Price | Shares (000) | Price | |||||||||||||||
$ 5.69 to $6.19 |
3 | 2.22 | $ | 5.88 | 3 | $ | 5.88 | |||||||||||||
$ 6.79 to $7.71 |
166 | 2.58 | 6.85 | 166 | 6.85 | |||||||||||||||
$ 8.64 to $9.55 |
88 | 3.43 | 9.41 | 88 | 9.41 | |||||||||||||||
$10.50 to $10.81 |
47 | 5.31 | 10.59 | 47 | 10.59 | |||||||||||||||
$11.73 to $11.73 |
173 | 6.80 | 11.73 | 173 | 11.73 | |||||||||||||||
$12.20 to $12.20 |
175 | 5.96 | 12.20 | 175 | 12.20 | |||||||||||||||
$18.32 to $19.60 |
55 | 7.44 | 19.03 | 27 | 19.08 | |||||||||||||||
$20.35 to $20.48 |
17 | 7.10 | 20.43 | 9 | 20.42 | |||||||||||||||
$22.36 to $25.01 |
27 | 7.14 | 22.86 | 23 | 22.48 | |||||||||||||||
751 | 711 | |||||||||||||||||||
During the third quarter of 2009, the Company granted 6,400 shares of restricted common stock
to its President and Chief Operating Officer. Due to the death of this officer, these shares of
restricted shares became fully vested. The amount of expense during the first quarter of 2010
associated with the vesting of the 6,400 shares was approximately $144,000. These restricted
shares are also limited by the 2009 agreement between the Company and the Treasury. This Treasury
agreement has additional provisions concerning the transferability of the shares and the
continuation of performing substantial services for the Company.
During the fourth quarter of 2009, the Company granted 4,545 shares of restricted common
stock. The restricted shares will vest equally each year over three years beginning on the third
anniversary of the grant.
During the first quarter of 2010, the Company granted 17,100 shares of restricted common
stock. The restricted shares will vest equally each year over three years beginning on the first
anniversary of the grant. Of the 17,100 shares of restricted stock granted, 13,600 shares are also
limited by the 2009 agreement between the Company and the Treasury. This Treasury agreement has
additional provisions concerning the transferability of the shares and the continuation of
performing substantial services for the Company. Due to the death of the Companys President, 1,600
of restricted shares became fully vested. The amount of expense during the first quarter of 2010
associated with the vesting of the 1,600 shares was approximately $39,000.
27
Table of Contents
13. Non-Interest Expense
The table below shows the components of non-interest expense for three months ended March 31,
2010 and 2009:
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Salaries and employee benefits |
$ | 8,534 | $ | 8,944 | ||||
Occupancy and equipment |
2,799 | 2,677 | ||||||
Data processing expense |
862 | 777 | ||||||
Other operating expenses: |
||||||||
Advertising |
366 | 600 | ||||||
Merger expenses |
1,059 | 742 | ||||||
Amortization of intangibles |
479 | 463 | ||||||
Amortization of mortgage servicing rights |
218 | 147 | ||||||
Electronic banking expense |
477 | 863 | ||||||
Directors fees |
145 | 284 | ||||||
Due from bank service charges |
90 | 100 | ||||||
FDIC and state assessment |
898 | 965 | ||||||
Insurance |
300 | 297 | ||||||
Legal and accounting |
388 | 435 | ||||||
Mortgage servicing expense |
84 | 72 | ||||||
Other professional fees |
313 | 259 | ||||||
Operating supplies |
186 | 213 | ||||||
Postage |
150 | 176 | ||||||
Telephone |
138 | 178 | ||||||
Other expense |
1,069 | 1,070 | ||||||
Total other operating expenses |
6,360 | 6,864 | ||||||
Total non-interest expense |
$ | 18,555 | $ | 19,262 | ||||
14: Concentration of Credit Risks
The Companys primary market area is in central Arkansas, north central Arkansas, northwest
Arkansas, southern Arkansas, central Florida, southwest Florida and the Florida Keys (Monroe
County). The Company primarily grants loans to customers located within these geographical areas
unless the borrower has an established relationship with the Company.
The diversity of the Companys economic base tends to provide a stable lending environment.
Although the Company has a loan portfolio that is diversified in both industry and geographic area,
a substantial portion of its debtors ability to honor their contracts is dependent upon real
estate values, tourism demand and the economic conditions prevailing in its market areas.
15: Significant Estimates and Concentrations
Accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America require disclosure of
certain significant estimates and current vulnerabilities due to certain concentrations. Estimates
related to the allowance for loan losses and certain concentrations of credit risk are reflected in
Note 4, while deposit concentrations are reflected in Note 7.
28
Table of Contents
Although the Company has a diversified loan portfolio, at March 31, 2010 and December 31,
2009, non-covered commercial real estate loans represented 62.1% and 62.1% of gross non-covered
loans and 254.4% and 260.5% of total stockholders equity, respectively. Non-covered residential
real estate loans represented 22.7% and 22.8% of gross loans and 93.0% and 95.7% of total
stockholders equity at March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively.
The current economic environment presents financial institutions with unprecedented
circumstances and challenges which in some cases have resulted in large declines in the fair values
of investments and other assets, constraints on liquidity and significant credit quality problems,
including severe volatility in the valuation of real estate and other collateral supporting loans.
The financial statements have been prepared using values and information currently available to the
Company.
Given the volatility of current economic conditions, the values of assets and liabilities
recorded in the financial statements could change rapidly, resulting in material future adjustments
in asset values, the allowance for loan losses and capital that could negatively impact the
Companys ability to meet regulatory capital requirements and maintain sufficient liquidity.
16: Commitments and Contingencies
In the ordinary course of business, the Company makes various commitments and incurs certain
contingent liabilities to fulfill the financing needs of their customers. These commitments and
contingent liabilities include lines of credit and commitments to extend credit and issue standby
letters of credit. The Company applies the same credit policies and standards as they do in the
lending process when making these commitments. The collateral obtained is based on the assessed
creditworthiness of the borrower.
At March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, commitments to extend credit of $309.1 million and
$299.4 million, respectively, were outstanding. A percentage of these balances are participated out
to other banks; therefore, the Company can call on the participating banks to fund future draws.
Since some of these commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon, the total
commitment amount does not necessarily represent future cash requirements.
Outstanding standby letters of credit are contingent commitments issued by the Company,
generally to guarantee the performance of a customer in third-party borrowing arrangements. The
term of the guarantee is dependent upon the credit worthiness of the borrower some of which are
long-term. The amount of collateral obtained, if deemed necessary, is based on managements credit
evaluation of the counterparty. Collateral held varies but may include accounts receivable,
inventory, property, plant and equipment, commercial real estate and residential real estate.
Management uses the same credit policies in granting lines of credit as it does for
on-balance-sheet instruments. The maximum amount of future payments the Company could be required
to make under these guarantees at March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, is $17.4 million and $15.6
million, respectively.
The Company and/or its subsidiary bank have various unrelated legal proceedings, most of which
involve loan foreclosure activity pending, which, in the aggregate, are not expected to have a
material adverse effect on the financial position and results of operations of the Company.
29
Table of Contents
17: Regulatory Matters
The Bank is subject to a legal limitation on dividends that can be paid to the parent company
without prior approval of the applicable regulatory agencies. Arkansas bank regulators have
specified that the maximum dividend limit state banks may pay to the parent company without prior
approval is 75% of the current year earnings plus 75% of the retained net earnings of the preceding
year. Since, the Bank is also under supervision of the Federal Reserve, they are further limited if
the total of all dividends declared in any calendar year by the Bank exceeds the Banks net profits
to date for that year combined with its retained net profits for the preceding two years. In 2009,
the Company received a dividend for $2.1 million from its banking subsidiary. During the first
three months of 2010, the Company did not request any dividends from its banking subsidiary. As a
result of the additional common equity raised through an underwritten public offering during
September 2009, the Company does not anticipate requesting dividends from its banking subsidiary
during 2010.
The Federal Reserve Boards risk-based capital guidelines include the definitions for (1) a
well-capitalized institution, (2) an adequately-capitalized institution, and (3) and
undercapitalized institution. The criteria for a well-capitalized institution are: a 5% Tier 1
leverage capital ratio, a 6% Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio, and a 10% total risk-based
capital ratio. As of March 31, 2010, the Bank met the capital standards for a well-capitalized
institution. The Companys Tier 1 leverage capital ratio, Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio, and
total risk-based capital ratio were 17.26%, 19.42%, and 20.68%, respectively, as of March 31,
2010.
18: Additional Cash Flow Information
The following is summary of the Companys additional cash flow information during the three
months ended:
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Interest paid |
$ | 8,548 | $ | 11,416 | ||||
Income taxes paid |
3,950 | | ||||||
Assets acquired by foreclosure |
3,180 | 9,424 |
In connection with the Old Southern Acquisition and Key West Acquisition, accounted for by
using the purchase method, the Company acquired approximately $345.1 million and $89.6 million in
assets, assumed $335.4 million and $87.5 million in liabilities, and received net funds of $9.7
million and $2.1 million, respectively during March 2010. The following is a summary of the
Companys additional cash flow information during the three months ended:
Three Months Ended | ||||
March 31, | ||||
2010 | ||||
(In thousands) | ||||
Acquisitions: |
||||
Assets acquired Old Southern |
$ | 345,084 | ||
Liabilities assumed Old Southern |
335,367 | |||
Bargain purchase gain |
$ | 9,717 | ||
Assets acquired Key West |
$ | 89,592 | ||
Liabilities assumed Key West |
87,519 | |||
Bargain purchase gain |
$ | 2,073 | ||
30
Table of Contents
19: Financial Instruments
Effective January 1, 2008, the Company adopted FASB ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and
Disclosures. FASB ASC 820 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and
expands disclosures about fair value measurements. FASB ASC 820 has been applied prospectively as
of the beginning of the period.
FASB ASC 820 defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid
to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement
date. FASB ASC 820 also establishes a fair value hierarchy which requires an entity to maximize
the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value.
The standard describes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value:
Level 1 | Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities | ||
Level 2 | Observable inputs other than Level 1 prices, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in active markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities | ||
Level 3 | Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities |
Available-for-sale securities are the only material instruments valued on a recurring basis
which are held by the Company at fair value. The Company does not have any Level 1 securities.
Primarily all of the Companys securities are considered to be Level 2 securities. These Level 2
securities consist of U.S. government-sponsored enterprises, mortgage-backed securities plus state
and political subdivisions. As of March 31, 2010, Level 3 securities were immaterial.
Impaired loans that are collateral dependent are the only material financial assets valued on
a non-recurring basis which are held by the Company at fair value. Loan impairment is reported when
full payment under the loan terms is not expected. Impaired loans are carried at the fair value of
collateral if the loan is collateral dependent. A portion of the allowance for loan losses is
allocated to impaired loans if the value of such loans is deemed to be less than the unpaid
balance. If these allocations cause the allowance for loan losses to require increase, such
increase is reported as a component of the provision for loan losses. Loan losses are charged
against the allowance when management believes the uncollectability of a loan is confirmed.
Non-covered impaired loans, net of specific allowance, were $31.2 million and $27.8 million as of
March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively. This valuation would be considered Level 3,
consisting of appraisals of underlying collateral.
Foreclosed assets held for sale are the only material non-financial assets valued on a
non-recurring basis which are held by the Company at fair value, less estimated costs to sell. At
foreclosure, if the fair value, less estimated costs to sell, of the real estate acquired is less
than the Companys recorded investment in the related loan, a write-down is recognized through a
charge to the allowance for loan losses. Additionally, valuations are periodically performed by
management and any subsequent reduction in value is recognized by a charge to income. The fair
value of foreclosed assets held for sale is estimated using Level 2 inputs based on observable
market data. As of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the fair value of foreclosed assets held
for sale not covered by loss share, less estimated costs to sell was $17.6 million and $16.5
million, respectively.
Fair Values of Financial Instruments
The following methods and assumptions were used by the Company in estimating fair values of
financial instruments as disclosed in these notes:
Cash and cash equivalents and federal funds sold For these short-term instruments, the
carrying amount is a reasonable estimate of fair value.
31
Table of Contents
Net loans receivable not covered by loss share, net of non-covered impaired loans For
variable-rate loans that reprice frequently and with no significant change in credit risk, fair
values are assumed to approximate the carrying amounts. The fair values for fixed-rate loans are
estimated using discounted cash flow analysis, based on interest rates currently being offered for
loans with similar terms to borrowers of similar credit quality. Loan fair value estimates include
judgments regarding future expected loss experience and risk characteristics.
Net loans receivable covered by FDIC loss share Fair values for loans were based on a
discounted cash flow methodology that considered factors including the type of loan and related
collateral, classification status, fixed or variable interest rate, term of loan and whether or not
the loan was amortizing, and current discount rates. Loans were grouped together according to
similar characteristics and were treated in the aggregate when applying various valuation
techniques. The discount rates used for loans are based on current market rates for new
originations of comparable loans and include adjustments for liquidity concerns. The discount rate
does not include a factor for credit losses as that has been included in the estimated cash flows.
FDIC indemnification asset Although this asset is a contractual receivable from the FDIC,
there is no effective interest rate. The Bank will collect this asset over the next several years.
The amount ultimately collected will depend on the timing and amount of collections and charge-offs
on the acquired assets covered by the loss sharing agreement. While this asset was recorded at its
estimated fair value at acquisition date, it is not practicable to complete a fair value analysis
on a quarterly or annual basis. This would involve preparing a fair value analysis of the entire
portfolio of loans and foreclosed assets covered by the loss sharing agreement on a quarterly or
annual basis in order to estimate the fair value of the FDIC indemnification asset.
Accrued interest receivable The carrying amount of accrued interest receivable approximates
its fair value.
Deposits and securities sold under agreements to repurchase The fair values of demand,
savings deposits and securities sold under agreements to repurchase are, by definition, equal to
the amount payable on demand and therefore approximate their carrying amounts. The fair values for
time deposits are estimated using a discounted cash flow calculation that utilizes interest rates
currently being offered on time deposits with similar contractual maturities.
Federal funds purchased The carrying amount of federal funds purchased approximates its
fair value.
FHLB and other borrowed funds For short-term instruments, the carrying amount is a
reasonable estimate of fair value. The fair value of long-term debt is estimated based on the
current rates available to the Company for debt with similar terms and remaining maturities.
Accrued interest payable The carrying amount of accrued interest payable approximates its
fair value.
Subordinated debentures The fair value of subordinated debentures is estimated using the
rates that would be charged for subordinated debentures of similar remaining maturities.
Commitments to extend credit, letters of credit and lines of credit The fair value of
commitments is estimated using the fees currently charged to enter into similar agreements, taking
into account the remaining terms of the agreements and the present creditworthiness of the
counterparties. For fixed rate loan commitments, fair value also considers the difference between
current levels of interest rates and the committed rates. The fair values of letters of credit and
lines of credit are based on fees currently charged for similar agreements or on the estimated cost
to terminate or otherwise settle the obligations with the counterparties at the reporting date.
The following table presents the estimated fair values of the Companys financial instruments.
The fair values of certain of these instruments were calculated by discounting expected cash flows,
which involves significant judgments by management and uncertainties. Fair value is the estimated
amount at which financial assets or liabilities could be exchanged in a current transaction between
willing parties other than in a forced or liquidation sale. Because no market exists for certain of
these financial instruments and because management does not intend to sell these financial
instruments, the Company does not know whether the fair values shown below represent values at
which the respective financial instruments could be sold individually or in the aggregate.
32
Table of Contents
March 31, 2010 | ||||||||
Carrying | ||||||||
Amount | Fair Value | |||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Financial assets: |
||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 193,009 | $ | 193,009 | ||||
Federal funds sold |
11,207 | 11,207 | ||||||
Loans receivable not covered by loss share, net of non-covered
impaired loans and allowance |
1,885,671 | 1,882,646 | ||||||
Loans receivable covered by FDIC loss share |
225,885 | 225,885 | ||||||
FDIC
indemnification asset |
88,274 | 88,274 | ||||||
Accrued interest receivable |
14,854 | 14,854 | ||||||
Financial liabilities: |
||||||||
Deposits: |
||||||||
Demand and non-interest bearing |
$ | 354,663 | $ | 354,663 | ||||
Savings and interest-bearing transaction accounts |
863,988 | 863,988 | ||||||
Time deposits |
1,002,437 | 1,007,422 | ||||||
Federal funds purchased |
| | ||||||
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase |
55,403 | 55,403 | ||||||
FHLB and other borrowed funds |
254,548 | 255,503 | ||||||
Accrued interest payable |
2,948 | 2,948 | ||||||
Subordinated debentures |
47,462 | 62,042 |
December 31, 2009 | ||||||||
Carrying | ||||||||
Amount | Fair Value | |||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Financial assets: |
||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 173,490 | $ | 173,490 | ||||
Federal funds sold |
11,760 | 11,760 | ||||||
Loans receivable not covered by loss share, net of non-covered
impaired loans and allowance |
1,879,544 | 1,876,544 | ||||||
Accrued interest receivable |
13,137 | 13,137 | ||||||
Financial liabilities: |
||||||||
Deposits: |
||||||||
Demand and non-interest bearing |
$ | 302,228 | $ | 302,228 | ||||
Savings and interest-bearing transaction accounts |
714,744 | 714,744 | ||||||
Time deposits |
818,451 | 823,137 | ||||||
Federal funds purchased |
| | ||||||
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase |
62,000 | 62,000 | ||||||
FHLB and other borrowed funds |
264,360 | 265,246 | ||||||
Accrued interest payable |
3,245 | 3,245 | ||||||
Subordinated debentures |
47,484 | 62,466 |
33
Table of Contents
20: Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In June 2009, FASB issued FASB ASC 860, Transfers and Servicing. The objective of FASB ASC 860
is to improve the relevance, representational faithfulness, and comparability of the information
that a reporting entity provides in its financial statements about a transfer of financial assets;
the effects of a transfer on its financial position, financial performance, and cash flows; and a
transferors continuing involvement in transferred financial assets. FASB ASC 860 shall be
effective as of the beginning of each reporting entitys first annual reporting period that begins
after November 15, 2009, for interim periods within that first annual reporting period, and for
interim and annual reporting periods thereafter. The adoption of ASC 860 did not have a material
effect on the Companys consolidated financial statements.
In June 2009, FASB issued FASB ASC 810, Consolidation. The objective of FASB ASC 810 is to
improve financial reporting by enterprises involved with variable interest entities and to provide
more relevant and reliable information to users of financial statements. FASB ASC 810 shall be
effective as of the beginning of each reporting entitys first annual reporting period that begins
after November 15, 2009, for interim periods within that first annual reporting period, and for
interim and annual reporting periods thereafter. Earlier application is prohibited. The adoption of
ASC 810 did not have a material effect on the Companys consolidated financial statements.
In January 2010, FASB issued an amendment to FASB ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and
Disclosures. The objective of this amendment requires new disclosures regarding significant
transfers in and out of Level 1 and 2 fair value measurements and the reasons for the transfers.
This amendment also requires that a reporting entity should present information separately about
purchases, sales, issuances and settlements, on a gross basis rather than a net basis for activity
in Level 3 fair value measurements using significant unobservable inputs. This amendment also
clarifies existing disclosures on the level of disaggregation, in that the reporting entity needs
to use judgment in determining the appropriate classes of assets and liabilities, and that a
reporting entity should provide disclosures about the valuation techniques and inputs used to
measure fair value for both recurring and nonrecurring fair value measurements for Level 2 and 3.
The new disclosures and clarifications of existing disclosures for ASC 820 are effective for
interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2009, except for the disclosures
about purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements in the rollforward of activity in Level 3 fair
value measurements. Those disclosures are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15,
2010, and for interim periods within those fiscal years. The adoption of ASC 820 did not have a
material effect on the Companys consolidated financial statements.
Presently, the Company is not aware of any other changes from the Financial Accounting
Standards Board that will have a material impact on the Companys present or future financial
statements.
21. Subsequent Events
On April 22, 2010, our Board of Directors declared a 10% stock dividend which will be paid
June 4, 2010 to shareholders of record as of May 14, 2010. Except for fractional shares, the
holders of our common stock will receive 10% additional common stock on June 4, 2010. The common
shareholders will receive cash in lieu of fractional shares.
Subsequent events have been evaluated through the date the financial statements were issued.
34
Table of Contents
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Audit Committee, Board of Directors and Stockholders
Home BancShares, Inc.
Conway, Arkansas
Home BancShares, Inc.
Conway, Arkansas
We have reviewed the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet of Home BancShares, Inc. as
of March 31, 2010 and the related condensed consolidated statements of income, statements of
stockholders equity and cash flows for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2010 and 2009.
These interim financial statements are the responsibility of the Companys management.
We conducted our reviews in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (United States). A review of interim financial information consists principally of
applying analytical procedures to financial data and making inquiries of persons responsible for
financial and accounting matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in
accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, the objective of
which is the expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole.
Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.
Based on our reviews, we are not aware of any material modifications that should be made to the
condensed consolidated financial statements referred to above for them to be in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
We have previously audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2009, and the
related consolidated statements of income, stockholders equity and cash flows for the year then
ended (not presented herein); and in our report dated March 5, 2010, we expressed an unqualified
opinion on those consolidated financial statements. In our opinion, the information set forth in
the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2009, is fairly stated, in
all material respects, in relation to the consolidated balance sheet from which it has been
derived.
/s/ BKD, LLP | ||||
Little Rock, Arkansas
May 10, 2010
May 10, 2010
35
Table of Contents
Item 2: | MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS |
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our Form 10-K, filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on March 5, 2010, which includes the audited financial
statements for the year ended December 31, 2009. Unless the context requires otherwise, the terms
Company, us, we, and our refer to Home BancShares, Inc. on a consolidated basis.
General
We are a bank holding company headquartered in Conway, Arkansas, offering a broad array of
financial services through our wholly owned bank subsidiary. As of March 31, 2010, we had, on a
consolidated basis, total assets of $3.08 billion, loans receivable not covered by loss share of
$1.96 billion, total deposits of $2.22 billion, and stockholders equity of $478.3 million.
We generate most of our revenue from interest on loans and investments, service charges, and
mortgage banking income. Deposits and FHLB borrowed funds are our primary source of funding. Our
largest expenses are interest on our funding sources and salaries and related employee benefits. We
measure our performance by calculating our return on average common equity, return on average
assets, and net interest margin. We also measure our performance by our efficiency ratio, which is
calculated by dividing non-interest expense less amortization of core deposit intangibles by the
sum of net interest income on a tax equivalent basis and non-interest income.
Key Financial Measures
As of or for the Three Months | ||||||||
Ended March 31, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data) | ||||||||
Total assets |
$ | 3,078,199 | $ | 2,586,151 | ||||
Loans receivable not covered by loss share |
1,959,666 | 1,950,285 | ||||||
Loans receivable covered by FDIC loss share |
225,885 | | ||||||
Total deposits |
2,221,088 | 1,836,447 | ||||||
Net income |
14,374 | 6,245 | ||||||
Net income available to common stockholders |
13,704 | 5,679 | ||||||
Basic earnings per common share |
0.53 | 0.29 | ||||||
Diluted earnings per common share |
0.53 | 0.28 | ||||||
Diluted cash earnings per common share (1) |
0.54 | 0.30 | ||||||
Annualized net interest margin FTE |
4.26 | % | 3.93 | % | ||||
Efficiency ratio |
40.12 | 62.12 | ||||||
Annualized return on average assets |
2.12 | 0.97 | ||||||
Annualized return on average common equity |
13.28 | 8.02 |
(1) | See Table 18 Diluted Cash Earnings Per Share for a reconciliation to GAAP for diluted cash earnings per share. |
36
Table of Contents
Overview
Results of Operations for Three Months Ended March 31, 2010 and 2009
Our net income increased 130.2% to $14.4 million for the three-month period ended March 31,
2010, from $6.2 million for the same period in 2009. On a diluted earnings per share basis, our
earnings were $0.53 and $0.28 for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2010 and 2009,
respectively. The $8.1 million increase in net income is primarily associated with an $11.8 million
pre-tax gain on the recent FDIC-assisted acquisitions, a 33 basis point increase in net interest margin,
reduced salaries and employee benefits offset by the higher provision for loan losses and lower
mortgage lending income.
In
addition to the $11.8 million
pre-tax gain on the acquisitions, the Company incurred $1.1 million of
acquisition expenses for the transactions during the first quarter of 2010.
The combined financial impact of these items to the Company on an after-tax
basis is a profit of $6.5 million or $0.25 diluted earnings per common share.
If adjusted for these non core items, the announced profit for the first
quarter of 2010 would reflect core net income of $7.9 million or $0.28
diluted earnings per share.
Our annualized return on average assets was 2.12% for the three months ended March 31, 2010,
compared to 0.97% for the same period in 2009. Our annualized return on average common equity was
13.28% for the three months ended March 31, 2010, compared to 8.02% for the same period in 2009,
respectively. The improvements in annualized return on average assets and annualized return on
average common equity were primarily due to the previously discussed changes in earnings for the
three months ended March 31, 2010, compared to the same period in 2009.
Our annualized net interest margin, on a fully taxable equivalent basis, was 4.26% for the
three months ended March 31, 2010, compared to 3.93% for the same period in 2009. Our ability to
improve pricing on our deposits and hold down the decline of interest rates on earning assets
allowed the Company to expand net interest margin by 33 basis points.
Our efficiency ratio was 40.12% for the three months ended March 31, 2010, compared to 62.12%
for the same period in 2009. This positive progress was primarily due to the gains earned on
acquisitions, our ability to raise net interest margin and the continued improvement of our overall
operations.
Excluding the $6.5 million after-tax combined profit on the first quarter 2010 acquisitions, our core efficiency ratio would have been 51.16%.
Financial Condition as of and for the Period Ended March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009
Our total assets as of March 31, 2010 increased $393.3 million, an annualized growth of 59.4%,
to $3.08 billion from the $2.68 billion reported as of December 31, 2009. Our loan portfolio not
covered by loss share increased slightly by $9.4 million, an annualized growth of 2.0%, to $1.96
billion as of March 31, 2010, from $1.95 billion as of December 31, 2009. Stockholders equity
increased $13.4 million to $478.3 million as of March 31, 2010, compared to $465.0 million as of
December 31, 2009. The increase in assets is primarily associated with asset acquired in our recent
FDIC-assisted acquisitions. The increase in stockholders equity is primarily associated with the
gains on our FDIC-assisted acquisitions plus normal increases in retained earnings. The annualized
growth in stockholders equity for the first three months of 2010 was 11.7%.
As of March 31, 2010, our non-performing non-covered loans slightly improved to $37.8 million,
or 1.93%, of total non-covered loans from $39.9 million, or 2.05%, of total non-covered loans as of
December 31, 2009. The allowance for loan losses as a percent of non-performing loans increased to
113.28% as of March 31, 2010, compared to 107.57% as of December 31, 2009. Non-performing
non-covered loans in Florida were $28.1 million at March 31, 2010 compared to $30.2 million as of
December 31, 2009.
As of March 31, 2010, our non-performing non-covered assets slightly improved to $55.8
million, or 2.03%, of total non-covered assets from $56.8 million, or 2.12%, of total non-covered
assets as of December 31, 2009. Non-performing non-covered assets in Florida were $40.3 million at
March 31, 2010 compared to $40.8 million as of December 31, 2009.
37
Table of Contents
Critical Accounting Policies
Overview. We prepare our consolidated financial statements based on the selection of certain
accounting policies, generally accepted accounting principles and customary practices in the
banking industry. These policies, in certain areas, require us to make significant estimates and
assumptions. Our accounting policies are described in detail in the notes to our consolidated
financial statements in Note 1 of the audited consolidated financial statements included in our
Form 10-K, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
We consider a policy critical if (i) the accounting estimate requires assumptions about
matters that are highly uncertain at the time of the accounting estimate; and (ii) different
estimates that could reasonably have been used in the current period, or changes in the accounting
estimate that are reasonably likely to occur from period to period, would have a material impact on
our financial statements. Using these criteria, we believe that the accounting policies most
critical to us are those associated with our lending practices, including the accounting for the
allowance for loan losses, investments, intangible assets, income taxes and stock options.
Investments. Securities available for sale are reported at fair value with unrealized holding
gains and losses reported as a separate component of stockholders equity and other comprehensive
income (loss). Securities that are held as available for sale are used as a part of our
asset/liability management strategy. Securities that may be sold in response to interest rate
changes, changes in prepayment risk, the need to increase regulatory capital, and other similar
factors are classified as available for sale.
Loans Receivable Not Covered by Loss Share and Allowance for Loan Losses. Substantially all
of our loans receivable not covered by loss share are reported at their outstanding principal
balance adjusted for any charge-offs, as it is managements intent to hold them for the foreseeable
future or until maturity or payoff, except for mortgage loans held for sale. Interest income on
loans is accrued over the term of the loans based on the principal balance outstanding.
The allowance for loan losses is established through a provision for loan losses charged
against income. The allowance represents an amount that, in managements judgment, will be adequate
to absorb probable credit losses on identifiable loans that may become uncollectible and probable
credit losses inherent in the remainder of the loan portfolio. The amounts of provisions for loan
losses are based on managements analysis and evaluation of the loan portfolio for identification
of problem credits, internal and external factors that may affect collectability, relevant credit
exposure, particular risks inherent in different kinds of lending, current collateral values and
other relevant factors.
The allowance consists of allocated and general components. The allocated component relates
to loans that are classified as impaired. For those loans that are classified as impaired, an
allowance is established when the discounted cash flows, or collateral value or observable market
price of the impaired loan is lower than the carrying value of that loan. The general component
covers nonclassified loans and is based on historical charge-off experience and expected loss given
default derived from the Banks internal risk rating process. Other adjustments may be made to the
allowance for pools of loans after an assessment of internal or external influences on credit
quality that are not fully reflected in the historical loss or risking rating data.
Loans considered impaired, under FASB ASC 310-10-35 (formerly SFAS No. 114, Accounting by
Creditors for Impairment of a Loan, as amended by SFAS No. 118, Accounting by Creditors for
Impairment of a Loan-Income Recognition and Disclosures), are loans for which, based on current
information and events, it is probable that the Company will be unable to collect all amounts due
according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. The Company applies this policy even if
delays or shortfalls in payment are expected to be insignificant. The aggregate amount of
impairment of loans is utilized in evaluating the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses and
amount of provisions thereto. Losses on impaired loans are charged against the allowance for loan
losses when in the process of collection it appears likely that such losses will be realized. The
accrual of interest on impaired loans is discontinued when, in managements opinion, the borrower
may be unable to meet payments as they become due. When accrual of interest is discontinued, all
unpaid accrued interest is reversed.
38
Table of Contents
Groups of loans with similar risk characteristics, including individually evaluated loans not
determined to be impaired, are collectively evaluated for impairment based on the groups
historical loss experience adjusted for changes in trends, conditions and other relevant factors
that affect repayment of the loans. Accordingly, the Company does not separately identify
individual consumer and residential loans for impairment measurements.
Loans are placed on non-accrual status when management believes that the borrowers financial
condition, after giving consideration to economic and business conditions and collection efforts,
is such that collection of interest is doubtful, or generally when loans are 90 days or more past
due. Loans are charged against the allowance for loan losses when management believes that the
collectability of the principal is unlikely. Accrued interest related to non-accrual loans is
generally charged against the allowance for loan losses when accrued in prior years and reversed
from interest income if accrued in the current year. Interest income on non-accrual loans may be
recognized to the extent cash payments are received, although the majority of payments received are
usually applied to principal. Non-accrual loans are generally returned to accrual status when
principal and interest payments are less than 90 days past due, the customer has made required
payments for at least six months, and we reasonably expect to collect all principal and interest.
Acquisition Accounting, Covered Loans and Related Indemnification Asset. Beginning in 2009,
the Company accounts for its acquisitions under ASC Topic 805, Business Combinations, which
requires the use of the purchase method of accounting. All identifiable assets acquired, including
loans, are recorded at fair value. No allowance for loan losses related to the acquired loans is
recorded on the acquisition date as the fair value of the loans acquired incorporates assumptions
regarding credit risk. Loans acquired are recorded at fair value in accordance with the fair value
methodology prescribed in ASC Topic 820, exclusive of the shared-loss agreements with the Federal
Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC). The fair value estimates associated with the loans include
estimates related to expected prepayments and the amount and timing of undiscounted expected
principal, interest and other cash flows.
Over the life of the acquired loans, the Company continues to estimate cash flows expected to
be collected on pools of loans sharing common risk characteristics, which are treated in the
aggregate when applying various valuation techniques. The Company evaluates at each balance sheet
date whether the present value of its pools of loans determined using the effective interest rates
has decreased and if so, recognizes a provision for loan loss in its consolidated statement of
income. For any increases in cash flows expected to be collected, the Company adjusts the amount of
accretable yield recognized on a prospective basis over the pools remaining life.
Because the FDIC will reimburse the Company for certain acquired loans should the Company
experience a loss, an indemnification asset is recorded at fair value at the acquisition date. The
indemnification asset is recognized at the same time as the indemnified loans, and measured on the
same basis, subject to collectability or contractual limitations. The shared-loss agreements on the
acquisition date reflect the reimbursements expected to be received from the FDIC, using an
appropriate discount rate, which reflects counterparty credit risk and other uncertainties.
The shared-loss agreements continue to be measured on the same basis as the related
indemnified loans. Because the acquired loans are subject to the accounting prescribed by ASC Topic
310, subsequent changes to the basis of the shared-loss agreements also follow that model.
Deterioration in the credit quality of the loans (immediately recorded as an adjustment to the
allowance for loan losses) would immediately increase the basis of the shared-loss agreements, with
the offset recorded through the consolidated statement of income. Increases in the credit quality
or cash flows of loans (reflected as an adjustment to yield and accreted into income over the
remaining life of the loans) decrease the basis of the shared-loss agreements, with such decrease
being accreted into income over 1) the same period or 2) the life of the shared-loss agreements,
whichever is shorter. Loss assumptions used in the basis of the indemnified loans are consistent
with the loss assumptions used to measure the indemnification asset. Fair value accounting
incorporates into the fair value of the indemnification asset an element of the time value of
money, which is accreted back into income over the life of the shared-loss agreements.
Upon the determination of an incurred loss the indemnification asset will be reduced by the
amount owed by the FDIC. A corresponding, claim receivable is recorded until cash is received from
the FDIC.
39
Table of Contents
Intangible Assets. Intangible assets consist of goodwill and core deposit intangibles.
Goodwill represents the excess purchase price over the fair value of net assets acquired in
business acquisitions. The core deposit intangible represents the excess intangible value of
acquired deposit customer relationships as determined by valuation specialists. The core deposit
intangibles are being amortized over 84 to 114 months on a straight-line basis. Goodwill is not
amortized but rather is evaluated for impairment on at least an annual basis. We perform an annual
impairment test of goodwill and core deposit intangibles as required by FASB ASC 350, Intangibles -
Goodwill and Other in the fourth quarter.
Income Taxes. The Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with income tax accounting
guidance (ASC 740, Income Taxes). The income tax accounting guidance results in two components of
income tax expense: current and deferred. Current income tax expense reflects taxes to be paid or
refunded for the current period by applying the provisions of the enacted tax law to the taxable
income or excess of deductions over revenues. The Company determines deferred income taxes using
the liability (or balance sheet) method. Under this method, the net deferred tax asset or
liability is based on the tax effects of the differences between the book and tax bases of assets
and liabilities, and enacted changes in tax rates and laws are recognized in the period in which
they occur.
Deferred income tax expense results from changes in deferred tax assets and liabilities
between periods. Deferred tax assets are recognized if it is more likely than not, based on the
technical merits, that the tax position will be realized or sustained upon examination. The term
more likely than not means a likelihood of more than 50 percent; the terms examined and upon
examination also include resolution of the related appeals or litigation processes, if any. A tax
position that meets the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold is initially and subsequently
measured as the largest amount of tax benefit that has a greater than 50 percent likelihood of
being realized upon settlement with a taxing authority that has full knowledge of all relevant
information. The determination of whether or not a tax position has met the more-likely-than-not
recognition threshold considers the facts, circumstances and information available at the reporting
date and is subject to the managements judgment. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation
allowance if, based on the weight of evidence available, it is more likely than not that some
portion or all of a deferred tax asset will not be realized.
The Company and its subsidiary file consolidated tax returns. Its subsidiary provides for
income taxes on a separate return basis, and remits to the Company amounts determined to be
currently payable.
Stock Options. In accordance with FASB ASC 718, Compensation Stock Compensation and FASB
ASC 505-50, Equity-Based Payments to Non-Employees, the fair value of each option award is
estimated on the date of grant. The Company recognizes compensation expense for the grant-date
fair value of the option award over the vesting period of the award.
Acquisitions
Acquisition Old Southern Bank
On March 12, 2010, Centennial Bank entered into a purchase and assumption agreement (Old
Southern Agreement) with the FDIC, as receiver, pursuant to which Centennial Bank acquired certain
assets and assumed substantially all of the deposits and certain liabilities of Old Southern Bank
(Old Southern).
Prior to the acquisition, Old Southern operated 7 banking centers in the Orlando, Florida
metropolitan area. Excluding the effects of purchase accounting adjustments, Centennial Bank
acquired $335.4 million in assets and assumed approximately $328.5 million of the deposits of Old
Southern. Additionally, Centennial Bank purchased loans with an estimated fair value of $179.1
million, $3.1 million of foreclosed assets and $30.4 million of investment securities.
See Note 2 Business Combinations to the Consolidated Financial Statements for an additional
discussion for the acquisition of Old Southern.
40
Table of Contents
Acquisition Key West Bank
On March 26, 2010, Centennial Bank, entered into separate purchase and assumption agreements
(Key West Bank Agreement) with the FDIC, as receiver, pursuant to which Centennial Bank acquired
certain assets and assumed substantially all of the deposits and certain liabilities of Key West
Bank (Key West).
Prior to the acquisition, Key West operated one banking center located in Key West, Florida.
Excluding the effects of purchase accounting adjustments, Centennial Bank acquired $96.8 million in
assets and assumed approximately $66.7 million of the deposits of Key West. Additionally,
Centennial Bank purchased loans with an estimated fair value of $46.9 million, $5.7 million of
foreclosed assets and assumed $20.0 million of FHLB advances.
See Note 2 Business Combinations to the Consolidated Financial Statements for an additional
discussion for the acquisition of Key West.
Future Acquisitions
In our continuing evaluation of our growth plans for the Company, we believe properly priced
bank acquisitions can complement our organic growth and de novo branching growth strategies. In
the near term, our principal acquisition focus will be to expand our presence in Florida, Arkansas
and other nearby markets through pursuing FDIC-assisted acquisition opportunities. We are
continually evaluating potential bank acquisitions to determine what is in the best interest of our
Company. Our goal in making these decisions is to maximize the return to our investors.
Branches
We intend to continue to open new (commonly referred to as de novo) branches in our current
markets and in other attractive market areas if opportunities arise. Presently, we are evaluating
additional opportunities but have no firm commitments for any additional de novo branch locations.
During 2010, Centennial Bank entered into two loss sharing agreements with the FDIC. Through
these two transactions, we added a total of eight branch locations in Florida. These branch
locations include three in Orlando, one in Winter Park, two in Longwood, one in Clermont and one in
Key West.
Charter Consolidation
During 2009, we combined the charters of our subsidiary banks into a single charter and
adopted Centennial Bank as the common name. In the fourth quarter of 2008, First State Bank and
Marine Bank consolidated and adopted Centennial Bank as its new name. Community Bank and Bank of
Mountain View were completed in the first quarter of 2009, and Twin City Bank and the original
Centennial Bank finished the process in June of 2009.
All of our banks now have the same name, logo and charter, allowing for a more
customer-friendly banking experience and seamless transactions across our entire banking network.
We remain committed, however, to our community banking philosophy and will continue to rely on
local community bank boards and management built around experienced bankers with strong local
relationships.
Results of Operations
For Three Months Ended March 31, 2010 and 2009
Our net income increased 130.2% to $14.4 million for the three-month period ended March 31,
2010, from $6.2 million for the same period in 2009. On a diluted earnings per share basis, our
earnings were $0.53 and $0.28 for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2010 and 2009,
respectively. The $8.1 million increase in net income is primarily associated with an $11.8 million
pre-tax gain on the recent FDIC-assisted acquisitions, a 33 basis point increase in net interest margin,
reduced salaries and employee benefits offset by the higher provision for loan losses and lower
mortgage lending income.
In
addition to the $11.8 million
pre-tax gain on the acquisitions, the Company incurred $1.1 million of
acquisition expenses for the transactions during the first quarter of 2010.
The combined financial impact of these items to the Company on an after-tax
basis is a profit of $6.5 million or $0.25 diluted earnings per common share.
If adjusted for these non core items, the announced profit for the first
quarter of 2010 would reflect core net income of $7.9 million or $0.28
diluted earnings per share.
41
Table of Contents
Net Interest Income
Net interest income, our principal source of earnings, is the difference between the interest
income generated by earning assets and the total interest cost of the deposits and borrowings
obtained to fund those assets. Factors affecting the level of net interest income include the
volume of earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, yields earned on loans and investments
and rates paid on deposits and other borrowings, the level of non-performing loans and the amount
of non-interest-bearing liabilities supporting earning assets. Net interest income is analyzed in
the discussion and tables below on a fully taxable equivalent basis. The adjustment to convert
certain income to a fully taxable equivalent basis consists of dividing tax-exempt income by one
minus the combined federal and state income tax rate.
The Federal Reserve Board sets various benchmark rates, including the Federal Funds rate, and
thereby influences the general market rates of interest, including the deposit and loan rates
offered by financial institutions. The Federal Funds rate, which is the cost to banks of
immediately available overnight funds, began in 2008 at 4.25%. During 2008, the rate decreased by
75 basis points on January 22, 2008, 50 basis points on January 30, 2008, 75 basis points on March
18, 2008, 25 basis points on April 30, 2008 and 50 basis points to a rate of 1.50% as of October 8,
2008. The rate continued to fall 50 basis points on October 29, 2008 and 75 to 100 basis points to
a low of 0.25% to 0% on December 16, 2008.
Net interest income on a fully taxable equivalent basis increased $3.3 million, or 14.4%, to
$25.9 million for the three-month period ended March 31, 2010, from $22.7 million for the same
period in 2009. This increase in net interest income was the result of a $139,000 increase in
interest income combined with a $3.1 million decrease in interest expense. The $139,000 increase
in interest income was primarily the result of a higher level of earning assets offset by the
repricing of our earning assets in the lower interest rate environment. The higher level of earning
assets resulted in an increase in interest income of $468,000, while the repricing of our earning
assets in the lower interest rate environment resulted in a $329,000 decrease in interest income
for the three-month period ended March 31, 2010. The $3.1 million decrease in interest expense for
the three-month period ended March 31, 2010, is primarily the result of our interest bearing
liabilities repricing in the lower interest rate environment combined with a reduction in our
interest bearing liabilities. The repricing of our interest bearing liabilities in the lower
interest rate environment resulted in a $2.6 million decrease in interest expense. The reduction
of our interest bearing liabilities resulted in lower interest expense of $548,000.
Net interest margin, on a fully taxable equivalent basis, was 4.26% for the three months ended
March 31, 2010 compared to 3.93% for the same period in 2009. Our ability to improve pricing on our
deposits and hold the decline of interest rates on earning assets to a minimum allowed the Company
to expand net interest margin.
42
Table of Contents
Tables 1 and 2 reflect an analysis of net interest income on a fully taxable equivalent basis
for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, as well as changes in fully taxable
equivalent net interest margin for the three-month period ended March 31, 2010, compared to the
same period in 2009.
Table 1: Analysis of Net Interest Income
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||
Interest income |
$ | 33,062 | $ | 33,108 | ||||
Fully taxable equivalent adjustment |
1,050 | 865 | ||||||
Interest income fully taxable equivalent |
34,112 | 33,973 | ||||||
Interest expense |
8,163 | 11,297 | ||||||
Net interest income fully taxable equivalent |
$ | 25,949 | $ | 22,676 | ||||
Yield on earning assets fully taxable equivalent |
5.60 | % | 5.89 | % | ||||
Cost of interest-bearing liabilities |
1.68 | 2.29 | ||||||
Net interest spread fully taxable equivalent |
3.92 | 3.60 | ||||||
Net interest margin fully taxable equivalent |
4.26 | 3.93 |
Table 2: Changes in Fully Taxable Equivalent Net Interest Margin
Three Months Ended | ||||
March 31, | ||||
2010 vs. 2009 | ||||
(In thousands) | ||||
Increase (decrease) in interest income due to change in earning assets |
$ | 468 | ||
Increase (decrease) in interest income due to change in earning asset yields |
(329 | ) | ||
(Increase) decrease in interest expense due to change in interest-bearing liabilities |
548 | |||
(Increase) decrease in interest expense due to change in interest rates paid on
interest-bearing liabilities |
2,586 | |||
Increase (decrease) in net interest income |
$ | 3,273 | ||
43
Table of Contents
Table 3 shows, for each major category of earning assets and interest-bearing
liabilities, the average amount outstanding, the interest income or expense on that amount and the
average rate earned or expensed for the three-month period ended March 31, 2010 and 2009. The table
also shows the average rate earned on all earning assets, the average rate expensed on all
interest-bearing liabilities, the net interest spread and the net interest margin for the same
periods. The analysis is presented on a fully taxable equivalent basis. Non-accrual loans were
included in average loans for the purpose of calculating the rate earned on total loans.
Table 3: Average Balance Sheets and Net Interest Income Analysis
Three Months Ended March 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Average | Income / | Yield / | Average | Income / | Yield / | |||||||||||||||||||
Balance | Expense | Rate | Balance | Expense | Rate | |||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Earnings assets |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest-bearing balances due from banks |
$ | 137,747 | $ | 85 | 0.25 | % | $ | 8,604 | $ | 12 | 0.57 | % | ||||||||||||
Federal funds sold |
7,361 | 5 | 0.28 | 13,846 | 7 | 0.21 | ||||||||||||||||||
Investment securities taxable |
194,329 | 1,627 | 3.40 | 230,762 | 2,653 | 4.66 | ||||||||||||||||||
Investment securities non-taxable |
138,128 | 2,387 | 7.01 | 117,082 | 2,064 | 7.15 | ||||||||||||||||||
Gross loans including covered loans
and indemnification asset |
1,993,626 | 30,008 | 6.10 | 1,966,934 | 29,237 | 6.03 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total interest-earning assets |
2,471,191 | 34,112 | 5.60 | 2,337,228 | 33,973 | 5.89 | ||||||||||||||||||
Non-earning assets |
282,956 | 261,009 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Total assets |
$ | 2,754,147 | $ | 2,598,237 | ||||||||||||||||||||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Liabilities |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest-bearing liabilities |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Savings and interest-bearing
transaction accounts |
$ | 756,412 | $ | 1,084 | 0.58 | % | $ | 667,281 | $ | 1,285 | 0.78 | % | ||||||||||||
Time deposits |
862,437 | 4,211 | 1.98 | 913,504 | 6,833 | 3.03 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total interest-bearing deposits |
1,618,849 | 5,295 | 1.33 | 1,580,785 | 8,118 | 2.08 | ||||||||||||||||||
Federal funds purchased |
44 | | 0.00 | 3,790 | 2 | 0.21 | ||||||||||||||||||
Securities sold under agreement
to repurchase |
53,795 | 94 | 0.71 | 84,730 | 111 | 0.53 | ||||||||||||||||||
FHLB borrowed funds |
247,514 | 2,177 | 3.57 | 280,876 | 2,390 | 3.45 | ||||||||||||||||||
Subordinated debentures |
47,476 | 597 | 5.10 | 47,566 | 676 | 5.76 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total interest-bearing liabilities |
1,967,678 | 8,163 | 1.68 | 11,297 | 2.29 | |||||||||||||||||||
Non-interest bearing liabilities |
1,997,747 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Non-interest bearing deposits |
306,512 | 264,595 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Other liabilities |
12,300 | 7,786 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Total liabilities |
2,286,490 | 2,270,128 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Stockholders equity |
467,657 | 328,109 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Total liabilities and
stockholders equity |
$ | 2,754,147 | $ | 2,598,237 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest spread |
3.92 | % | 3.60 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest income and margin |
$ | 25,949 | 4.26 | % | $ | 22,676 | 3.93 | % | ||||||||||||||||
44
Table of Contents
Table 4 shows changes in interest income and interest expense resulting from changes in volume
and changes in interest rates for the three-month period ended March 31, 2010 compared to the same
periods in 2009, on a fully taxable basis. The changes in interest rate and volume have been
allocated to changes in average volume and changes in average rates, in proportion to the
relationship of absolute dollar amounts of the changes in rates and volume.
Table 4: Volume/Rate Analysis
Three Months Ended March 31, | ||||||||||||
2010 over 2009 | ||||||||||||
Volume | Yield/Rate | Total | ||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||
Increase (decrease) in: |
||||||||||||
Interest income: |
||||||||||||
Interest-bearing balances due from banks |
$ | 84 | $ | (11 | ) | $ | 73 | |||||
Federal funds sold |
(4 | ) | 2 | (2 | ) | |||||||
Investment securities taxable |
(377 | ) | (649 | ) | (1,026 | ) | ||||||
Investment securities non-taxable |
365 | (42 | ) | 323 | ||||||||
Loans receivable |
400 | 371 | 771 | |||||||||
Total interest income |
468 | (329 | ) | 139 | ||||||||
Interest expense: |
||||||||||||
Interest-bearing transaction and savings deposits |
157 | (358 | ) | (201 | ) | |||||||
Time deposits |
(364 | ) | (2,258 | ) | (2,622 | ) | ||||||
Federal funds purchased |
(1 | ) | (1 | ) | (2 | ) | ||||||
Securities sold under agreement to repurchase |
(48 | ) | 31 | (17 | ) | |||||||
FHLB borrowed funds |
(291 | ) | 78 | (213 | ) | |||||||
Subordinated debentures |
(1 | ) | (78 | ) | (79 | ) | ||||||
Total interest expense |
(548 | ) | (2,586 | ) | (3,134 | ) | ||||||
Increase in net interest income |
$ | 1,016 | $ | 2,257 | $ | 3,273 | ||||||
Provision for Loan Losses
Our management assesses the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses by applying the
provisions of FASB ASC 310-10-35 (formerly Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 5,
Accounting for Contingencies and No. 114, Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan).
Specific allocations are determined for loans considered to be impaired and loss factors are
assigned to the remainder of the loan portfolio to determine an appropriate level in the allowance
for loan losses. The allowance is increased, as necessary, by making a provision for loan losses.
The specific allocations for impaired loans are assigned based on an estimated net realizable value
after a thorough review of the credit relationship. The potential loss factors associated with the
remainder of the loan portfolio are based on an internal net loss experience, as well as
managements review of trends within the portfolio and related industries.
During these tough economic times, the Company continues to follow our historical conservative
procedures for lending and evaluating the provision and allowance for loan losses. We have not
and do not participate in higher risk lending such as subprime. Our practice continues to be
primarily traditional real estate lending with strong loan-to-value ratios. While there have been
declines in our collateral value, particularly Florida, these declines have been addressed in our
assessment of the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses.
45
Table of Contents
Generally, commercial, commercial real estate, and residential real estate loans are assigned
a level of risk at origination. Thereafter, these loans are reviewed on a regular basis. The
periodic reviews generally include loan payment and collateral status, the borrowers financial
data, and key ratios such as cash flows, operating income, liquidity, and leverage. A material
change in the borrowers credit analysis can result in an increase or decrease in the loans
assigned risk grade. Aggregate dollar volume by risk grade is monitored on an on-going basis.
Our management reviews certain key loan quality indicators on a monthly basis, including
current economic conditions, delinquency trends and ratios, portfolio mix changes, and other
information management deems necessary. This review process provides a degree of objective
measurement that is used in conjunction with periodic internal evaluations. To the extent that this
review process yields differences between estimated and actual observed losses, adjustments are
made to the loss factors used to determine the appropriate level of the allowance for loan losses.
During the first quarter of 2008, we began to experience a decline in our asset quality,
particularly in the Florida market. In 2009, non-performing non-covered loans were $39.9 million.
As of March 31, 2010, non-performing non-covered loans are $37.8 million.
The provision for loan losses represents managements determination of the amount necessary to
be charged against the current periods earnings, to maintain the allowance for loan losses at a
level that is considered adequate in relation to the estimated risk inherent in the loan portfolio.
Our provision for loan losses increased $2.1 million, or 210.0%, to $3.1 million for the
three-month period ended March 31, 2010, from $1.0 million for the same period in 2009. The net
loans charged off for the three-month period ended March 31, 2010 were $3.2 million compared to
$563,000 for the same period in 2009. The increased provision for loan loss is a result of the
higher charge-offs for 2010. The net charge-offs were $2.5 million and $743,000 for Arkansas and
Florida, respectively.
Non-Interest Income
Total non-interest income was $19.1 million for the three-month period ended March 31, 2010
compared to $7.6 million for the same period in 2009. Our recurring non-interest income includes
service charges on deposit accounts, other service charges and fees, mortgage lending, mortgage
servicing, insurance, title fees, increase in cash value of life insurance and dividends.
Table 5 measures the various components of our non-interest income for the three-month periods
ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively, as well as changes for the three-month period ended
March 31, 2010 compared to the same period in 2009.
46
Table of Contents
Table 5: Non-Interest Income
Three Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||
March 31, | 2010 Change | |||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | from 2009 | ||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Service charges on deposit accounts |
$ | 3,141 | $ | 3,374 | $ | (233 | ) | (6.9 | )% | |||||||
Other service charges and fees |
1,638 | 1,784 | (146 | ) | (8.2 | ) | ||||||||||
Mortgage lending income |
412 | 880 | (468 | ) | (53.2 | ) | ||||||||||
Mortgage servicing income |
160 | 200 | (40 | ) | (20.0 | ) | ||||||||||
Insurance commissions |
347 | 257 | 90 | 35.0 | ||||||||||||
Income from title services |
107 | 140 | (33 | ) | (23.6 | ) | ||||||||||
Increase in cash value of life insurance |
428 | 477 | (49 | ) | (10.3 | ) | ||||||||||
Dividends from FHLB, FRB &
bankers bank |
126 | 107 | 19 | 17.8 | ||||||||||||
Gain on acquisitions |
11,790 | | 11,790 | 100.0 | ||||||||||||
Gain (loss) on sale of premises
and equipment, net |
207 | 7 | 200 | 2,857.1 | ||||||||||||
Gain (loss) on OREO, net |
159 | (117 | ) | 276 | (235.9 | ) | ||||||||||
Gain (loss) on securities, net |
| | | 0.0 | ||||||||||||
Other income |
586 | 476 | 110 | 23.1 | ||||||||||||
Total non-interest income |
$ | 19,101 | $ | 7,585 | $ | 11,516 | 151.8 | % | ||||||||
Non-interest income increased $11.5 million, or 151.8%, to $19.1 million for the three-month
period ended March 31, 2010 from $7.6 million for the same period in 2009. Excluding the gain on
acquisitions, non-interest income for the three-month period ended March 31, 2010 decreased
$274,000 or 3.6% for the same period in 2009. The primary factors that resulted in this decrease
are the declines in mortgage lending income and lower service charges on deposit accounts.
Non-Interest Expense
Non-interest expense consists of salaries and employee benefits, occupancy and equipment, data
processing, and other expenses such as advertising, amortization of intangibles, amortization of
mortgage servicing rights, electronic banking expense, FDIC and state assessment, mortgage
servicing and legal and accounting fees.
47
Table of Contents
Table 6 below sets forth a summary of non-interest expense for the three-month period ended
March 31, 2010 and 2009, as well as changes for the three-month period ended March 31, 2010
compared to the same period in 2009.
Table 6: Non-Interest Expense
Three Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||
March 31, | 2010 Change | |||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | from 2009 | ||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Salaries and employee benefits |
$ | 8,534 | $ | 8,944 | $ | (410 | ) | (4.6 | )% | |||||||
Occupancy and equipment |
2,799 | 2,677 | 122 | 4.6 | ||||||||||||
Data processing expense |
862 | 777 | 85 | 10.9 | ||||||||||||
Other operating expenses: |
||||||||||||||||
Advertising |
366 | 600 | (234 | ) | (39.0 | ) | ||||||||||
Merger and acquisition expenses |
1,059 | 742 | 317 | 42.7 | ||||||||||||
Amortization of intangibles |
479 | 463 | 16 | 3.5 | ||||||||||||
Amortization of mortgage servicing rights |
218 | 147 | 71 | 48.3 | ||||||||||||
Electronic banking expense |
477 | 863 | (386 | ) | (44.7 | ) | ||||||||||
Directors fees |
145 | 284 | (139 | ) | (48.9 | ) | ||||||||||
Due from bank service charges |
90 | 100 | (10 | ) | (10.0 | ) | ||||||||||
FDIC and state assessment |
898 | 965 | (67 | ) | (6.9 | ) | ||||||||||
Insurance |
300 | 297 | 3 | 1.0 | ||||||||||||
Legal and accounting |
388 | 435 | (47 | ) | (10.8 | ) | ||||||||||
Mortgage servicing expense |
84 | 72 | 12 | 16.7 | ||||||||||||
Other professional fees |
313 | 259 | 54 | 20.8 | ||||||||||||
Operating supplies |
186 | 213 | (27 | ) | (12.7 | ) | ||||||||||
Postage |
150 | 176 | (26 | ) | (14.8 | ) | ||||||||||
Telephone |
138 | 178 | (40 | ) | (22.5 | ) | ||||||||||
Other expense |
1,069 | 1,070 | (1 | ) | (0.1 | ) | ||||||||||
Total non-interest expense |
$ | 18,555 | $ | 19,262 | $ | (707 | ) | (3.7 | )% | |||||||
Non-interest expense decreased $707,000, or 3.7%, to $18.6 million for the three-month period
ended March 31, 2010, from $19.3 million for the same period in 2009. This decrease is the result
of our on-going implementation of the efficiency study and recently completed charter
consolidation, particularly in the reduced personnel costs offset by the addition expenses of our
first quarter acquisitions and the normal increase in cost of doing business.
The Board of Directors of the FDIC have increased insured institutions normal recurring
assessment and imposed a special assessment. We are generally unable to control the amount and
timetable for payment of premiums that we are required to pay for FDIC insurance. These increased
assessment fees are in response to the current banking crisis in the United States.
Income Taxes
The provision for income taxes increased $5.1 million, or 175.9%, to $8.0 million for the
three-month period ended March 31, 2010, from $2.9 million as of March 31, 2009. The effective
income tax rate was 35.7% for the three-months ended March 31, 2010, compared to 31.6% for the same
period in 2009, respectively. The primary cause of this increase is the result of our increase is
the $11.8 million gain on acquisitions plus improved earnings of the Company. The Companys
marginal tax rate is 39.225%
48
Table of Contents
Financial Condition as of and for the Period Ended March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009
Our total assets as of March 31, 2010 increased $393.3 million, an annualized growth of 59.4%,
to $3.08 billion from the $2.68 billion reported as of December 31, 2009. Our loan portfolio not
covered by loss share increased slightly by $9.4 million, an annualized growth of 2.0%, to $1.96
billion as of March 31, 2010, from $1.95 billion as of December 31, 2009. Stockholders equity
increased $13.4 million to $478.3 million as of March 31, 2010, compared to $465.0 million as of
December 31, 2009. The increase in assets is primarily associated with asset acquired in our recent
FDIC-assisted acquisitions. The increase in stockholders equity is primarily associated with the
gains on our FDIC-assisted acquisitions plus normal increases in retained earnings. The annualized
growth in stockholders equity for the first three months of 2010 was 11.7%.
Loans Receivable Not Covered by Loss Share
Our non-covered loan portfolio averaged $1.95 billion during the three-month period ended
March 31, 2010. Non-covered loans were $1.96 billion as of March 31, 2010, compared to $1.95
billion as of December 31, 2009, a modest annualized increase of 2.0%. The slow down in loan
growth from our historical expansion rates was not unexpected. Our customers have grown more
cautious in this weaker economy.
The most significant components of the non-covered loan portfolio were commercial real estate,
residential real estate, consumer, and commercial and industrial loans. These non-covered loans are
primarily originated within our market areas of central Arkansas, north central Arkansas, northwest
Arkansas, southern Arkansas, the Florida Keys, and southwest Florida and are generally secured by
residential or commercial real estate or business or personal property within our market areas.
Certain credit markets have experienced difficult conditions and volatility during 2009 and
2010, particularly Florida. The Florida market currently is approximately 92.9% secured by real
estate and 16.2% of our loan portfolio not covered by loss share.
Table 7 presents our loan balances not covered by loss share by category as of the dates
indicated.
Table 7: Loan Portfolio Not Covered by Loss Share
As of | As of | |||||||
March 31, | December 31, | |||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Real estate: |
||||||||
Commercial real estate loans: |
||||||||
Non-farm/non-residential |
$ | 822,252 | $ | 808,983 | ||||
Construction/land development |
363,738 | 368,723 | ||||||
Agricultural |
30,943 | 33,699 | ||||||
Residential real estate loans: |
||||||||
Residential 1-4 family |
381,451 | 382,504 | ||||||
Multifamily residential |
63,602 | 62,609 | ||||||
Total real estate |
1,661,986 | 1,656,518 | ||||||
Consumer |
33,206 | 39,084 | ||||||
Commercial and industrial |
231,867 | 219,847 | ||||||
Agricultural |
12,122 | 10,280 | ||||||
Other |
20,485 | 24,556 | ||||||
Loans receivable not covered by loss share |
1,959,666 | 1,950,285 | ||||||
49
Table of Contents
Non-Covered Commercial Real Estate Loans. We originate non-farm and non-residential loans
(primarily secured by commercial real estate), construction/land development loans, and
agricultural loans, which are generally secured by real estate located in our market areas. Our
commercial mortgage loans are generally collateralized by first liens on real estate and amortized
over a 10 to 20 year period with balloon payments due at the end of one to five years. These loans
are generally underwritten by addressing cash flow (debt service coverage), primary and secondary
source of repayment, the financial strength of any guarantor, the strength of the tenant (if any),
the borrowers liquidity and leverage, management experience, ownership structure, economic
conditions and industry specific trends and collateral. Generally, we will loan up to 85% of the
value of improved property, 65% of the value of raw land and 75% of the value of land to be
acquired and developed. A first lien on the property and assignment of lease is required if the
collateral is rental property, with second lien positions considered on a case-by-case basis.
As of March 31, 2010, non-covered commercial real estate loans totaled $1.22 billion, or 62.1%
of our non-covered loan portfolio, which is comparable to $1.21 billion, or 62.1% of our
non-covered loan portfolio, as of December 31, 2009. Florida non-covered commercial real estate
loans are approximately 10.1% of our non-covered loan portfolio.
Non-Covered Residential Real Estate Loans. We originate one to four family, owner occupied
residential mortgage loans generally secured by property located in our primary market area. The
majority of our non-covered residential mortgage loans consist of loans secured by owner occupied,
single family residences. Non-covered residential real estate loans generally have a loan-to-value
ratio of up to 90%. These loans are underwritten by giving consideration to the borrowers ability
to pay, stability of employment or source of income, debt-to-income ratio, credit history and
loan-to-value ratio.
As of March 31, 2010, non-covered residential real estate loans totaled $445.1 million, or
22.7% of our non-covered loan portfolio, which is comparable to $445.1 million, or 22.8% of our
non-covered loan portfolio, as of December 31, 2009. Florida non-covered residential real estate
loans are approximately 4.9% of our non-covered loan portfolio.
Non-Covered Consumer Loans. Our non-covered consumer loan portfolio is composed of secured
and unsecured loans originated by our banks. The performance of consumer loans will be affected by
the local and regional economy as well as the rates of personal bankruptcies, job loss, divorce and
other individual-specific characteristics.
As of March 31, 2010, our non-covered installment consumer loan portfolio totaled $33.2
million, or 1.7% of our total non-covered loan portfolio, compared to the $39.1 million, or 2.0% of
our non-covered loan portfolio as of December 31, 2009. This decrease is associated with normal
payoffs and pay downs.
Non-Covered Commercial and Industrial Loans. Commercial and industrial loans are made for a
variety of business purposes, including working capital, inventory, equipment and capital
expansion. The terms for commercial loans are generally one to seven years. Commercial loan
applications must be supported by current financial information on the borrower and, where
appropriate, by adequate collateral. Commercial loans are generally underwritten by addressing cash
flow (debt service coverage), primary and secondary sources of repayment, the financial strength of
any guarantor, the borrowers liquidity and leverage, management experience, ownership structure,
economic conditions and industry specific trends and collateral. The loan to value ratio depends on
the type of collateral. Generally speaking, accounts receivable are financed at between 50% and 80%
of accounts receivable less than 60 days past due. Inventory financing will range between 50% and
60% (with no work in process) depending on the borrower and nature of inventory. We require a first
lien position for those loans.
As of March 31, 2010, non-covered commercial and industrial loans outstanding totaled $231.9
million, or 11.8% of our non-covered loan portfolio, compared to $219.8 million, or 11.3% of our
non-covered loan portfolio, as of December 31, 2009. This increase is with an improving loan
demand for this product type.
50
Table of Contents
Total Loans Receivable
Table 8: Total Loans Receivable
As of March 31, 2010
As of March 31, 2010
Loans | Loans | |||||||||||
Receivable Not | Receivable | Total | ||||||||||
Covered by | Covered by FDIC | Loans | ||||||||||
Loss Share | Loss Share | Receivable | ||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||
Real estate: |
||||||||||||
Commercial real estate loans |
||||||||||||
Non-farm/non-residential |
$ | 822,252 | $ | 77,787 | $ | 900,039 | ||||||
Construction/land development |
363,738 | 72,133 | 435,871 | |||||||||
Agricultural |
30,943 | 2,895 | 33,838 | |||||||||
Residential real estate loans |
||||||||||||
Residential 1-4 family |
381,451 | 43,885 | 425,336 | |||||||||
Multifamily residential |
63,602 | 8,119 | 71,721 | |||||||||
Total real estate |
1,661,986 | 204,819 | 1,866,805 | |||||||||
Consumer |
33,206 | 347 | 33,553 | |||||||||
Commercial and industrial |
231,867 | 20,719 | 252,586 | |||||||||
Agricultural |
12,122 | | 12,122 | |||||||||
Other |
20,485 | | 20,485 | |||||||||
Total |
$ | 1,959,666 | $ | 225,885 | $ | 2,185,551 | ||||||
Non-Performing Assets Not Covered by Loss Share
We classify our non-covered problem loans into three categories: past due loans, special
mention loans and classified loans (accruing and non-accruing).
When management determines that a loan is no longer performing, and that collection of
interest appears doubtful, the loan is placed on non-accrual status. Loans that are 90 days past
due are placed on non-accrual status unless they are adequately secured and there is reasonable
assurance of full collection of both principal and interest. Our management closely monitors all
loans that are contractually 90 days past due, treated as special mention or otherwise classified
or on non-accrual status. Generally, non-accrual loans that are 120 days past due without assurance
of repayment are charged off against the allowance for loan losses.
51
Table of Contents
Table 9 sets forth information with respect to our non-performing non-covered assets as of
March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009. As of these dates, all non-performing non-covered
restructured loans are included in non-accrual non-covered loans.
Table 9: Non-performing Assets Not Covered by Loss Share
As of | As of | |||||||
March 31, | December 31, | |||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||
Non-accrual non-covered loans |
$ | 33,907 | $ | 37,056 | ||||
Non-covered loans past due 90 days or more (principal or
interest payments) |
3,915 | 2,889 | ||||||
Total non-performing non-covered loans |
37,822 | 39,945 | ||||||
Other non-performing non-covered assets |
||||||||
Non-covered foreclosed assets held for sale, net |
17,610 | 16,484 | ||||||
Other non-performing non-covered assets |
394 | 371 | ||||||
Total other non-performing non-covered assets |
18,004 | 16,855 | ||||||
Total non-performing non-covered assets |
$ | 55,826 | $ | 56,800 | ||||
Allowance for loan losses to non-performing non-covered loans |
113.28 | % | 107.57 | % | ||||
Non-performing non-covered loans to total non-covered loans |
1.93 | 2.05 | ||||||
Non-performing non-covered assets to total non-covered assets |
2.03 | 2.12 |
Our non-performing non-covered loans are comprised of non-accrual non-covered loans and
non-covered loans that are contractually past due 90 days. Our bank subsidiary recognizes income
principally on the accrual basis of accounting. When loans are classified as non-accrual, the
accrued interest is charged off and no further interest is accrued, unless the credit
characteristics of the loan improves. If a loan is determined by management to be uncollectible,
the portion of the loan determined to be uncollectible is then charged to the allowance for loan
losses.
Since December 31, 2007, the weakened real estate market, particularly in Florida, has and may
continue to increase our level of non-performing non-covered loans. While we believe our allowance
for loan losses is adequate at March 31, 2010, as additional facts become known about relevant
internal and external factors that affect loan collectability and our assumptions, it may result in
us making additions to the provision for loan loss during 2010.
As of March 31, 2010, we had $41.5 million of non-covered restructured loans that are in
compliance with the modified terms and are not reported as past due or non-accrual in Table 9. Of
the $41.5 million in non-covered restructured loans, $12.5 million are also reported as non-covered
impaired loans. Most of these credits are where borrowers have continued to pay as agreed
but negotiated a lower interest rate due to general economic pressures rather than credit specific
pressure. Our Florida market contains $35.3 million of these non-covered restructured loans.
Total foreclosed assets held for sale not covered by loss share were $17.6 million as of March
31, 2010, compared to $16.5 million as of December 31, 2009 for an increase of $1.1 million. The
foreclosed assets held for sale not covered by loss share are comprised of $12.2 million of assets
located in Florida with the remaining $5.4 million of assets located in Arkansas. The Florida
foreclosed assets include two Florida housing developments in the Keys. Each of the two housing
developments has vacant lots and one completed model home. The properties are currently listed for
sale with a broker.
Total non-performing non-covered loans were $37.8 million as of March 31, 2010, compared to
$39.9 million as of December 31, 2009 for a decrease of $2.1 million. The decrease in
non-performing loans is primarily from our Florida market. Non-performing non-covered loans are
$28.1 million in the Florida market.
If the non-accrual non-covered loans had been accruing interest in accordance with the
original terms of their respective agreements, interest income of approximately $534,000 and
$391,000 for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively, would have been
recorded. The interest income recognized on the non-covered non-accrual loans for the three-month
period ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 was considered immaterial.
52
Table of Contents
A loan is considered impaired when it is probable that we will not receive all amounts due
according to the contracted terms of the loans. Impaired loans may include non-performing loans
(loans past due 90 days or more and non-accrual loans) and certain other loans identified by
management that are still performing. As of March 31, 2010, average non-covered impaired loans were
$48.2 million compared to $36.0 million as of March 31, 2009. As of March 31, 2010, non-covered
impaired loans were $51.9 million compared to $44.4 million as of December 31, 2009 for an increase
of $7.5 million. This increase is the result of the underlying value of collateral on non-covered
loans continuing to deteriorate in the current unfavorable economic conditions. As of March 31,
2010, our Florida market accounted for $23.1 million of the non-covered impaired loans.
The Company evaluated loans purchased in conjunction with the acquisitions of Old Southern and
Key West for impairment in accordance with the provisions of FASB ASC Topic 310-30, Loans and Debt
Securities Acquired with Deteriorated Credit Quality. Purchased covered loans are considered
impaired if there is evidence of credit deterioration since origination and if it is probable that
not all contractually required payments will be collected. All loans acquired in these two
transactions were deemed to be covered impaired loans. These loans were not classified as
nonperforming assets at March 31, 2010, as the loans are accounted for on a pooled basis and the
pools are considered to be performing. Therefore, interest income, through accretion of the
difference between the carrying amount of the loans and the expected cash flows, is being
recognized on all purchased impaired loans.
Non-performing loans and impaired loans are defined differently. Some loans may be included
in both categories.
Past Due and Non-Accrual Loans
Table 10 shows the summary of past due and non-accrual loans as of March 31, 2010:
Table 10: Past Due and Non-Accrual Loans
March 31, 2010 | ||||||||||||
Assets Not | Assets Covered | |||||||||||
Covered by | by FDIC | |||||||||||
Loss Share | Loss Share | Total | ||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||
Non-accrual loans |
$ | 33,907 | $ | | $ | 33,907 | ||||||
Loans past due 90 days or more (principal or
interest payments) |
3,915 | 19,317 | 23,232 | |||||||||
Total |
$ | 37,822 | $ | 19,317 | $ | 57,139 | ||||||
The Companys total past due and non-accrual covered loans to total covered loans was 8.6% as
of March 31, 2010.
Allowance for Loan Losses
Overview. The allowance for loan losses is maintained at a level which our management
believes is adequate to absorb all probable losses on loans in the loan portfolio. The amount of
the allowance is affected by: (i) loan charge-offs, which decrease the allowance; (ii) recoveries
on loans previously charged off, which increase the allowance; and (iii) the provision of possible
loan losses charged to income, which increases the allowance. In determining the provision for
possible loan losses, it is necessary for our management to monitor fluctuations in the allowance
resulting from actual charge-offs and recoveries and to periodically review the size and
composition of the loan portfolio in light of current and anticipated economic conditions. If
actual losses exceed the amount of allowance for loan losses, our earnings could be adversely
affected.
As we evaluate the allowance for loan losses, we categorize it as follows: (i) specific
allocations; (ii) allocations for classified assets with no specific allocation; (iii) general
allocations for each major loan category; and (iv) miscellaneous allocations.
53
Table of Contents
Specific Allocations. As a general rule, if a specific allocation is warranted, it is the
result of an analysis of a previously classified credit or relationship. Our evaluation process in
specific allocations includes a review of appraisals or other collateral analysis. These values are
compared to the remaining outstanding principal balance. If a loss is determined to be reasonably
possible, the possible loss is identified as a specific allocation. If the loan is not collateral
dependent, the measurement of loss is based on the expected future cash flows of the loan.
Allocations for Classified Assets with No Specific Allocation. We establish allocations for
loans rated special mention through loss in accordance with the guidelines established by the
regulatory agencies. A percentage rate is applied to each loan category to determine the level of
dollar allocation.
General Allocations. We establish general allocations for each major loan category. This
section also includes allocations to loans, which are collectively evaluated for loss such as
residential real estate, commercial real estate, consumer loans and commercial and industrial
loans. The allocations in this section are based on a historical review of loan loss experience and
past due accounts. We give consideration to trends, changes in loan mix, delinquencies, prior
losses, and other related information.
Miscellaneous Allocations. Allowance allocations other than specific, classified, and general
are included in our miscellaneous section.
Charge-offs and Recoveries. Total charge-offs increased to $3.7 million for the three months
ended March 31, 2010, compared to $1.0 million for the same period in 2009. Total recoveries
increased to $497,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2010, compared to $452,000 for the same
period in 2009. The net charge-offs were $2.5 million and $743,000 for Arkansas and Florida,
respectively. We continue to take a proactive stance on asset quality issues.
54
Table of Contents
Table 11 shows the allowance for loan losses, charge-offs and recoveries as of and for the
three-month period ended March 31, 2010 and 2009.
Table 11: Analysis of Allowance for Loan Losses
Three Months Ended March 31, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||
Balance, beginning of period |
$ | 42,968 | $ | 40,385 | ||||
Loans charged off |
||||||||
Real estate: |
||||||||
Commercial real estate loans: |
||||||||
Non-farm/non-residential |
251 | 156 | ||||||
Construction/land development |
795 | 35 | ||||||
Agricultural |
| | ||||||
Residential real estate loans: |
||||||||
Residential 1-4 family |
778 | 344 | ||||||
Multifamily residential |
| | ||||||
Total real estate |
1,824 | 535 | ||||||
Consumer |
289 | 402 | ||||||
Commercial and industrial |
1,607 | 71 | ||||||
Agricultural |
| | ||||||
Other |
| 7 | ||||||
Total loans charged off |
3,720 | 1,015 | ||||||
Recoveries of loans previously charged off |
||||||||
Real estate: |
||||||||
Commercial real estate loans: |
||||||||
Non-farm/non-residential |
33 | 3 | ||||||
Construction/land development |
| | ||||||
Agricultural |
15 | | ||||||
Residential real estate loans: |
||||||||
Residential 1-4 family |
239 | 293 | ||||||
Multifamily residential |
| | ||||||
Total real estate |
287 | 296 | ||||||
Consumer |
176 | 147 | ||||||
Commercial and industrial |
19 | 8 | ||||||
Agricultural |
| | ||||||
Other |
15 | 1 | ||||||
Total recoveries |
497 | 452 | ||||||
Net loans charged off |
3,223 | 563 | ||||||
Provision for loan losses |
3,100 | 1,000 | ||||||
Balance, March 31 |
$ | 42,845 | $ | 40,822 | ||||
Net charge-offs to average non-covered loans |
0.67 | % | 0.12 | % | ||||
Allowance for loan losses to period end non-covered loans |
2.19 | 2.08 | ||||||
Allowance for loan losses to net charge-offs |
328 | 1,788 |
55
Table of Contents
Allocated Allowance for Loan Losses. We use a risk rating and specific reserve
methodology in the calculation and allocation of our allowance for loan losses. While the allowance
is allocated to various loan categories in assessing and evaluating the level of the allowance, the
allowance is available to cover charge-offs incurred in all loan categories. Because a portion of
our portfolio has not matured to the degree necessary to obtain reliable loss data from which to
calculate estimated future losses, the unallocated portion of the allowance is an integral
component of the total allowance. Although unassigned to a particular credit relationship or
product segment, this portion of the allowance is vital to safeguard against the imprecision
inherent in estimating credit losses.
The changes for the period ended March 31, 2010 in the allocation of the allowance for loan
losses for the individual types of loans are primarily associated with ordinary changes in asset
quality, net charge-offs during 2010 and normal changes in the outstanding loan portfolio for those
products from December 31, 2009.
Table 12 presents the allocation of allowance for loan losses as of March 31, 2010 and
December 31, 2009.
Table 12: Allocation of Allowance for Loan Losses
As of March 31, 2010 | As of December 31, 2009 | |||||||||||||||
Allowance Amount | % of loans (1) | Allowance Amount | % of loans (1) | |||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Real estate: |
||||||||||||||||
Commercial real estate loans: |
||||||||||||||||
Non-farm/non-residential |
$ | 11,967 | 42.0 | % | $ | 13,284 | 41.5 | % | ||||||||
Construction/land development |
9,961 | 18.6 | 9,624 | 18.9 | ||||||||||||
Agricultural |
194 | 1.6 | 284 | 1.7 | ||||||||||||
Residential real estate loans: |
||||||||||||||||
Residential 1-4 family |
11,973 | 19.5 | 10,654 | 19.6 | ||||||||||||
Multifamily residential |
1,680 | 3.2 | 694 | 3.2 | ||||||||||||
Total real estate |
35,775 | 84.9 | 34,540 | 84.9 | ||||||||||||
Consumer |
1,500 | 1.7 | 1,705 | 2.0 | ||||||||||||
Commercial and industrial |
5,145 | 11.8 | 6,067 | 11.3 | ||||||||||||
Agricultural |
190 | 0.6 | 279 | 0.5 | ||||||||||||
Other |
| 1.0 | | 1.3 | ||||||||||||
Unallocated |
235 | | 377 | | ||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 42,845 | 100.0 | % | $ | 42,968 | 100.0 | % | ||||||||
(1) | Percentage of loans in each category to loans receivable not covered by loss share. |
Investments and Securities
Our securities portfolio is the second largest component of earning assets and provides a
significant source of revenue. Securities within the portfolio are classified as held-to-maturity,
available-for-sale, or trading based on the intent and objective of the investment and the ability
to hold to maturity. Fair values of securities are based on quoted market prices where available.
If quoted market prices are not available, estimated fair values are based on quoted market prices
of comparable securities. As of March 31, 2010, we had no held-to-maturity or trading securities.
Securities available-for-sale are reported at fair value with unrealized holding gains and
losses reported as a separate component of stockholders equity as other comprehensive income.
Securities that are held as available-for-sale are used as a part of our asset/liability management
strategy. Securities may be sold in response to interest rate changes, changes in prepayment risk,
the need to increase regulatory capital, and other similar factors are classified as available for
sale. Available-for-sale securities were $362.7 million as of March 31, 2010, compared to $322.1
million as of December 31, 2009. The estimated effective duration of our securities portfolio was
3.0 years as of March 31, 2010.
56
Table of Contents
As of March 31, 2010, $107.5 million, or 29.6%, of our available-for-sale securities were
invested in mortgage-backed securities, compared to $115.6 million, or 35.9%, of our
available-for-sale securities as of December 31, 2009. To reduce our income tax burden, $149.1
million, or 41.1%, of our available-for-sale securities portfolio as of March 31, 2010, was
primarily invested in tax-exempt obligations of state and political subdivisions, compared to
$145.9 million, or 45.3%, of our available-for-sale securities as of December 31, 2009. Also, we
had approximately $101.7 million, or 28.0%, invested in obligations of U.S. Government-sponsored
enterprises as of March 31, 2010, compared to $56.1 million, or 17.4%, of our available-for-sale
securities as of December 31, 2009. The Company does not have any preferred securities
issued by the Federal National Mortgage Association or the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation.
Certain investment securities are valued at less than their historical cost. These declines
are primarily the result of the rate for these investments yielding less than current market rates.
Based on evaluation of available evidence, we believe the declines in fair value for these
securities are temporary. It is our intent to hold these securities to recovery. Should the
impairment of any of these securities become other than temporary, the cost basis of the investment
will be reduced and the resulting loss recognized in net income in the period the other than
temporary impairment is identified.
Table 13 presents the carrying value and fair value of investment securities as of March 31,
2010 and December 31, 2009.
Table 13: Investment Securities
As of March 31, 2010 | ||||||||||||||||
Gross | Gross | |||||||||||||||
Amortized | Unrealized | Unrealized | Estimated | |||||||||||||
Cost | Gains | (Losses) | Fair Value | |||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Available-for-Sale |
||||||||||||||||
U.S. government-sponsored
enterprises |
$ | 101,825 | $ | 131 | $ | (260 | ) | $ | 101,696 | |||||||
Mortgage-backed securities |
105,837 | 2,920 | (1,270 | ) | 107,487 | |||||||||||
State and political subdivisions |
147,651 | 2,439 | (1,006 | ) | 149,084 | |||||||||||
Other securities |
5,778 | | (1,335 | ) | 4,443 | |||||||||||
Total |
$ | 361,091 | $ | 5,490 | $ | (3,871 | ) | $ | 362,710 | |||||||
As of December 31, 2009 | ||||||||||||||||
Gross | Gross | |||||||||||||||
Amortized | Unrealized | Unrealized | Estimated | |||||||||||||
Cost | Gains | (Losses) | Fair Value | |||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Available-for-Sale |
||||||||||||||||
U.S. government-sponsored
enterprises |
$ | 56,439 | $ | 130 | $ | (463 | ) | $ | 56,106 | |||||||
Mortgage-backed securities |
114,464 | 2,813 | (1,690 | ) | 115,587 | |||||||||||
State and political subdivisions |
145,086 | 2,224 | (1,375 | ) | 145,935 | |||||||||||
Other securities |
5,837 | | (1,350 | ) | 4,487 | |||||||||||
Total |
$ | 321,826 | $ | 5,167 | $ | (4,878 | ) | $ | 322,115 | |||||||
57
Table of Contents
Deposits
Our deposits averaged $1.93 billion for the three-month period ended March 31, 2010. Total
deposits increased $385.7 million, or an increase of 21.0%, to $2.22 billion as of March 31, 2010,
from $1.84 billion as of December 31, 2009. Deposits are our primary source of funds. We offer a
variety of products designed to attract and retain deposit customers. Those products consist of
checking accounts, regular savings deposits, NOW accounts, money market accounts and certificates
of deposit. Deposits are gathered from individuals, partnerships and corporations in our market
areas. In addition, we obtain deposits from state and local entities and, to a lesser extent, U.S.
Government and other depository institutions.
Our policy also permits the acceptance of brokered deposits. As of March 31, 2010 and December
31, 2009, brokered deposits were $53.9 million and $71.0 million, respectively. Included in these
brokered deposits are $31.0 million and $36.8 million of Certificate of Deposit Account Registry
Service (CDARS) as of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively. CDARS are deposits we
have swapped our customer with other institutions. This gives our customer the potential for FDIC
insurance of up to $50 million.
The interest rates paid are competitively priced for each particular deposit product and
structured to meet our funding requirements. We will continue to manage interest expense through
deposit pricing and do not anticipate a significant change in total deposits unless our liquidity
position changes. We believe that additional funds can be attracted and deposit growth can be
accelerated through deposit pricing if we experience increased loan demand or other liquidity
needs.
The Federal Reserve Board sets various benchmark rates, including the Federal Funds rate, and
thereby influences the general market rates of interest, including the deposit and loan rates
offered by financial institutions. The Federal Funds rate, which is the cost to banks of
immediately available overnight funds, began in 2008 at 4.25%. During 2008, the rate decreased by
75 basis points on January 22, 2008, 50 basis points on January 30, 2008, 75 basis points on March
18, 2008, 25 basis points on April 30, 2008 and 50 basis points to a rate of 1.50% as of October 8,
2008. The rate continued to fall 50 basis points on October 29, 2008 and 75 to 100 basis points to
a low of 0.25% to 0% on December 16, 2008.
Table 14 reflects the classification of the average deposits and the average rate paid on each
deposit category, which is in excess of 10 percent of average total deposits, for the three-month
period ended March 31, 2010 and 2009.
Table 14: Average Deposit Balances and Rates
Three Months Ended March 31, | ||||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||||
Average Amount | Average Rate Paid | Average Amount | Average Rate Paid | |||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Non-interest-bearing
transaction accounts |
$ | 306,512 | | % | $ | 264,595 | | % | ||||||||
Interest-bearing transaction accounts |
686,490 | 0.60 | 607,731 | 0.79 | ||||||||||||
Savings deposits |
69,922 | 0.42 | 59,550 | 0.64 | ||||||||||||
Time deposits: |
||||||||||||||||
$100,000 or more |
528,190 | 1.96 | 496,037 | 2.97 | ||||||||||||
Other time deposits |
334,247 | 2.01 | 417,467 | 3.10 | ||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 1,925,361 | 1.12 | % | $ | 1,845,380 | 1.78 | % | ||||||||
58
Table of Contents
Securities Sold Under Agreements to Repurchase
During 2008, the U.S. regulatory agencies implemented the Transaction Account Guarantee
Program. Under the Transaction Account Guarantee Program through December 31, 2010, all
non-interest bearing transaction accounts are fully guaranteed by the FDIC for the entire amount in
the account. Coverage under the Transaction Account Guarantee Program is in addition to and
separate from the coverage available under the FDICs general deposit insurance rules. Since
business non-interest bearing accounts currently have unlimited deposit insurance coverage, many of
our business customers have chosen to move their money from repurchase agreements to non-interest
bearing demand accounts to take advantage of this unlimited coverage. As a result, securities sold
under agreements to repurchase decreased $6.6 million, or 10.6%, from $62.0 million as of December
31, 2009 to $55.4 million as of March 31, 2010.
FHLB Borrowed Funds
Our FHLB borrowed funds were $254.5 million and $264.4 million at March 31, 2010 and December
31, 2009, respectively. The outstanding balance for March 31, 2010 includes $20.0 million of
short-term advances and $234.5 million of long-term advances. All of the outstanding balance for
December 31, 2009 was long-term advances. Our remaining FHLB borrowing capacity was $410.9 million
and $418.3 million as of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively. Expected
maturities will differ from contractual maturities, because FHLB may have the right to call or
prepay certain obligations. The March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 remaining FHLB borrowing
capacity is elevated as a result of higher eligibility rates from Centennial Bank (formerly First
State Bank) being applied to the loans of the former charters which collapsed into Centennial Bank
(formerly First State Bank) during 2009. Centennial Bank (formerly First State Bank) will move to
FHLBs Large Financial Institution category in future quarters which will result in the borrowing
capacity being reevaluated and it is projected that the FHLB borrowing capacity will be
approximately 50% lower in the second quarter.
Subordinated Debentures
Subordinated debentures, which consist of guaranteed payments on trust preferred securities,
were $47.5 million as of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009.
Table 15 reflects subordinated debentures as of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, which
consisted of guaranteed payments on trust preferred securities with the following components:
Table 15: Subordinated Debentures
As of | As of | |||||||
March 31, | December 31, | |||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Subordinated debentures, issued in 2003, due 2033, fixed at 6.40%, during the
first five years and at a floating rate of 3.15% above the three-month LIBOR
rate, reset quarterly, thereafter, currently callable without penalty |
$ | 20,619 | $ | 20,619 | ||||
Subordinated debentures, issued in 2000, due 2030, fixed at 10.60%, callable
in 2010 with a penalty ranging from 5.30% to 0.53% depending on the year
of prepayment, callable in 2020 without penalty |
3,130 | 3,152 | ||||||
Subordinated debentures, issued in 2003, due 2033, floating rate of 3.15%
above the three-month LIBOR rate, reset quarterly, currently callable without
penalty |
5,155 | 5,155 | ||||||
Subordinated debentures, issued in 2005, due 2035, fixed rate of 6.81% during
the first ten years and at a floating rate of 1.38% above the three-month
LIBOR rate, reset quarterly, thereafter, callable in 2010 without penalty |
15,465 | 15,465 | ||||||
Subordinated debentures, issued in 2006, due 2036, fixed rate of 6.75%
during the first five years and at a floating rate of 1.85% above the three-month
LIBOR rate, reset quarterly, thereafter, callable in 2011 without penalty |
3,093 | 3,093 | ||||||
Total |
$ | 47,462 | $ | 47,484 | ||||
59
Table of Contents
The trust preferred securities are tax-advantaged issues that qualify for Tier 1 capital
treatment subject to certain limitations. Distributions on these securities are included in
interest expense. Each of the trusts is a statutory business trust organized for the sole purpose
of issuing trust securities and investing the proceeds in our subordinated debentures, the sole
asset of each trust. The trust preferred securities of each trust represent preferred beneficial
interests in the assets of the respective trusts and are subject to mandatory redemption upon
payment of the subordinated debentures held by the trust. We wholly own the common securities of
each trust. Each trusts ability to pay amounts due on the trust preferred securities is solely
dependent upon our making payment on the related subordinated debentures. Our obligations under the
subordinated securities and other relevant trust agreements, in aggregate, constitute a full and
unconditional guarantee by us of each respective trusts obligations under the trust securities
issued by each respective trust.
Presently, the funds raised from the trust preferred offerings qualify as Tier 1 capital for
regulatory purposes, subject to the applicable limit, with the balance qualifying as Tier 2
capital.
The Company holds two trust preferred securities which are currently callable without penalty
based on the terms of the specific agreements. The 2009 agreement between the Company and the
Treasury limits our ability to retire any of our qualifying capital. As a result, the notes
previously mentioned are not currently eligible to be paid off.
Stockholders Equity
Stockholders equity was $478.3 million at March 31, 2010 compared to $465.0 million at
December 31, 2009, an increase of 2.9%. As of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 our common
equity to asset ratio was 13.9% and 15.5%, respectively. Book value per common share was $16.68 at
March 31, 2010 compared to $16.18 at December 31, 2009.
Stock Offering. In September 2009, the Company raised common equity through an
underwritten public offering by issuing 4,950,000 shares of common stock at $19.85. The net
proceeds of the offering after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and offering
expenses were $93.3 million. In October 2009, the underwriters of our stock offering exercised and
completed their option to purchase an additional 742,500 shares of common stock at $19.85 to cover
over-allotments. The net proceeds of the exercise of the over-allotment option after deducting
underwriting discounts and commissions were $14.0 million. The total net proceeds of the offering
after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and offering expenses were $107.3 million.
Troubled Asset Relief Program. On January 16, 2009, we issued and sold, and the United States
Department of the Treasury purchased, (1) 50,000 shares of the Companys Fixed Rate Cumulative
Perpetual Preferred Stock Series A, liquidation preference of $1,000 per share, and (2) a ten-year
warrant to purchase up to 288,129 shares of the Companys common stock, par value $0.01 per share,
at an exercise price of $26.03 per share, for an aggregate purchase price of $50.0 million in cash.
Cumulative dividends on the Preferred Shares will accrue on the liquidation preference at a rate of
5% per annum for the first five years, and at a rate of 9% per annum thereafter. As a result of the
recent public stock offering, the number of shares of common stock underlying the ten-year warrant
held by the Treasury, has been reduced by half to 144,065 shares of our common stock at an exercise
price of $26.03 per share.
These preferred shares will qualify as Tier 1 capital. The preferred shares will be callable
at par after three years. Prior to the end of three years, the preferred shares may be redeemed
with the proceeds from a qualifying equity offering of any Tier 1 perpetual preferred or common
stock. The Treasury must approve any quarterly cash dividend on our common stock above $0.06 per
share or share repurchases until three years from the date of the investment unless the shares are
paid off in whole or transferred to a third party.
Cash Dividends. We declared cash dividends on our common stock of $0.06 per share for the
three-month periods ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The common stock dividend payout
ratio for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 was 10.7% and 19.1%, respectively. The
2009 agreement between the Company and the Treasury limits the payment of dividends on the Common
Stock to a quarterly cash dividend of not more than $0.06 per share.
60
Table of Contents
Repurchase Program. On January 18, 2008, we announced the adoption by our Board of Directors
of a stock repurchase program. The program authorizes us to repurchase up to 1,080,000 shares of
our common stock. Under the repurchase program, there is no time limit for the stock repurchases,
nor is there a minimum number of shares that we intend to repurchase. The repurchase program may be
suspended or discontinued at any time without prior notices. The timing and amount of any
repurchases will be determined by management, based on its evaluation of current market conditions
and other factors. The stock repurchase program will be funded using our cash balances, which we
believe are adequate to support the stock repurchase program and our normal operations. As of
March 31, 2010, we have not repurchased any shares in the program. The 2009 agreement between the
Company and the Treasury limits our ability to repurchase common stock.
Liquidity and Capital Adequacy Requirements
Risk-Based Capital. We as well as our bank subsidiary are subject to various regulatory
capital requirements administered by the federal banking agencies. Failure to meet minimum capital
requirements can initiate certain mandatory and other discretionary actions by regulators that, if
enforced, could have a direct material effect on our financial statements. Under capital adequacy
guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, we must meet specific capital
guidelines that involve quantitative measures of our assets, liabilities and certain
off-balance-sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. Our capital amounts
and classifications are also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators as to components,
risk weightings and other factors.
Quantitative measures established by regulation to ensure capital adequacy require us to
maintain minimum amounts and ratios (set forth in the table below) of total and Tier 1 capital to
risk-weighted assets, and of Tier 1 capital to average assets. Management believes that, as of
March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, we met all regulatory capital adequacy requirements to which
we were subject.
61
Table of Contents
Table 16 presents our risk-based capital ratios as of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009.
Table 16: Risk-Based Capital
As of | As of | |||||||
March 31, | December 31, | |||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||
Tier 1 capital |
||||||||
Stockholders equity |
$ | 478,338 | $ | 464,973 | ||||
Qualifying trust preferred securities |
46,000 | 46,000 | ||||||
Goodwill and core deposit intangibles, net |
(58,072 | ) | (55,590 | ) | ||||
Unrealized (gain) loss on
available-for-sale securities |
(984 | ) | (176 | ) | ||||
Servicing assets |
(87 | ) | (109 | ) | ||||
Total Tier 1 capital |
465,195 | 455,098 | ||||||
Tier 2 capital |
||||||||
Qualifying allowance for loan losses |
30,099 | 27,592 | ||||||
Total Tier 2 capital |
30,099 | 27,592 | ||||||
Total risk-based capital |
$ | 495,294 | $ | 482,690 | ||||
Average total assets for leverage ratio |
$ | 2,695,960 | $ | 2,611,964 | ||||
Risk weighted assets |
$ | 2,395,194 | $ | 2,192,000 | ||||
Ratios at end of period |
||||||||
Leverage ratio |
17.26 | % | 17.42 | % | ||||
Tier 1 risk-based capital |
19.42 | 20.76 | ||||||
Total risk-based capital |
20.68 | 22.02 | ||||||
Minimum guidelines |
||||||||
Leverage ratio |
4.00 | % | 4.00 | % | ||||
Tier 1 risk-based capital |
4.00 | 4.00 | ||||||
Total risk-based capital |
8.00 | 8.00 |
As of the most recent notification from regulatory agencies, our bank subsidiary was
well-capitalized under the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action. To be categorized
as well-capitalized, our banking subsidiary and we must maintain minimum leverage, Tier 1
risk-based capital, and total risk-based capital ratios as set forth in the table. There are no
conditions or events since that notification that we believe have changed the bank subsidiarys
category.
62
Table of Contents
Table 17 presents actual capital amounts and ratios as of March 31, 2010 and December 31,
2009, for our bank subsidiary and us.
Table 17: Capital and Ratios
Minimum To Be Well | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Capitalized Under Prompt | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Minimum Capital | Corrective Action | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Actual | Requirement | Provision | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Amount | Ratio | Amount | Ratio | Amount | Ratio | |||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
As of March 31, 2010 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Leverage ratios: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Home BancShares |
$ | 465,195 | 17.26 | % | $ | 107,809 | 4.00 | % | $ | N/A | N/A | % | ||||||||||||
Centennial Bank |
315,550 | 11.79 | 107,057 | 4.00 | 133,821 | 5.00 | ||||||||||||||||||
Tier 1 capital ratios: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Home BancShares |
$ | 465,195 | 19.42 | % | $ | 95,818 | 4.00 | % | $ | N/A | N/A | % | ||||||||||||
Centennial Bank |
315,550 | 13.26 | 95,189 | 4.00 | 142,783 | 6.00 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total risk-based capital ratios: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Home BancShares |
$ | 495,294 | 20.68 | % | $ | 191,603 | 8.00 | % | $ | N/A | N/A | % | ||||||||||||
Centennial Bank |
345,450 | 14.52 | 190,331 | 8.00 | 237,913 | 10.00 | ||||||||||||||||||
As of December 31, 2009 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Leverage ratios: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Home BancShares |
$ | 455,098 | 17.42 | % | $ | 104,500 | 4.00 | % | $ | N/A | N/A | % | ||||||||||||
Centennial Bank (Formerly FSB) |
266,220 | 10.21 | 104,298 | 4.00 | 130,372 | 5.00 | ||||||||||||||||||
Tier 1 capital ratios: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Home BancShares |
$ | 455,098 | 20.76 | % | $ | 87,687 | 4.00 | % | $ | N/A | N/A | % | ||||||||||||
Centennial Bank (Formerly FSB) |
266,220 | 12.21 | 87,214 | 4.00 | 130,821 | 6.00 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total risk-based capital ratios: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Home BancShares |
$ | 482,690 | 22.02 | % | $ | 175,364 | 8.00 | % | $ | N/A | N/A | % | ||||||||||||
Centennial Bank (Formerly FSB) |
293,665 | 13.47 | 174,411 | 8.00 | 218,014 | 10.00 |
Non-GAAP Financial Measurements
We had $60.0 million, $57.7 million, and $59.2 million total goodwill, core deposit
intangibles and other intangible assets as of March 31, 2010, December 31, 2009 and March 31, 2009,
respectively. Because of our level of intangible assets and related amortization expenses,
management believes diluted cash earnings per share, tangible book value per common share, cash
return on average assets, cash return on average tangible common equity and tangible common equity
to tangible assets are useful in evaluating our company. These calculations, which are similar to
the GAAP calculation of diluted earnings per share, book value, return on average assets, return on
average common equity, and common equity to assets, are presented in Tables 18 through 22,
respectively.
Table 18: Diluted Cash Earnings Per Share
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
(In thousands, except per share data) | ||||||||
GAAP net income available to common stockholders |
$ | 13,704 | $ | 5,679 | ||||
Intangible amortization after-tax |
291 | 281 | ||||||
Cash earnings available to common stockholders |
$ | 13,995 | $ | 5,960 | ||||
GAAP diluted earnings per common share |
$ | 0.53 | $ | 0.28 | ||||
Intangible amortization after-tax |
0.01 | 0.02 | ||||||
Diluted cash earnings per common share |
$ | 0.54 | $ | 0.30 | ||||
63
Table of Contents
Table 19: Tangible Book Value Per Share
As of | As of | |||||||
March 31, | December 31, | |||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data) | ||||||||
Book value per common share: A/B |
$ | 16.68 | $ | 16.18 | ||||
Tangible book value per common share: (A-C-D)/B |
14.35 | 13.93 | ||||||
(A) Total common equity |
$ | 429,018 | $ | 415,698 | ||||
(B) Common shares outstanding |
25,716 | 25,690 | ||||||
(C) Goodwill |
53,039 | 53,039 | ||||||
(D) Core deposit and other intangibles |
6,989 | 4,698 |
Table 20: Cash Return on Average Assets
Three Months Ended March 31, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||
Return on average assets: A/C |
2.12 | % | 0.97 | % | ||||
Cash return on average assets: B/(C-D) |
2.21 | 1.04 | ||||||
(A) Net income available to all stockholders |
$ | 14,374 | $ | 6,245 | ||||
Intangible amortization after-tax |
291 | 281 | ||||||
(B) Cash earnings |
$ | 14,665 | $ | 6,526 | ||||
(C) Average assets |
$ | 2,754,147 | $ | 2,598,237 | ||||
(D) Average goodwill, core deposits and other intangible assets |
58,078 | 57,032 |
Table 21: Cash Return on Average Tangible Common Equity
Three Months Ended March 31, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||
Return on average common equity: A/C |
13.28 | % | 8.02 | % | ||||
Return on average tangible common equity: B/(C-D) |
15.75 | 10.50 | ||||||
(A) Net income available to common stockholders |
$ | 13,704 | $ | 5,679 | ||||
(B) Cash earnings available to common stockholders |
13,995 | 5,960 | ||||||
(C) Average common equity |
418,375 | 287,193 | ||||||
(D) Average goodwill, core deposits and other
intangible assets |
58,078 | 57,032 |
64
Table of Contents
Table 22: Tangible Common Equity to Tangible Assets
As of | As of | |||||||
March 31, | December 31, | |||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||
Equity to assets: B/A |
15.54 | % | 17.32 | % | ||||
Common equity to assets: C/A |
13.94 | 15.48 | ||||||
Tangible common equity to tangible assets: (C-D-E)/(A-D-E) |
12.23 | 13.63 | ||||||
(A) Total assets |
$ | 3,078,199 | $ | 2,684,865 | ||||
(B) Total equity |
478,338 | 464,973 | ||||||
(C) Total common equity |
429,018 | 415,698 | ||||||
(D) Goodwill |
53,039 | 53,039 | ||||||
(E) Core deposit and other intangibles |
6,989 | 4,698 |
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
See Note 20 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for a discussion of certain recently
issued and recently adopted accounting pronouncements.
65
Table of Contents
Item 3: QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Liquidity and Market Risk Management
Liquidity Management. Liquidity refers to the ability or the financial flexibility to manage
future cash flows to meet the needs of depositors and borrowers and fund operations. Maintaining
appropriate levels of liquidity allows us to have sufficient funds available for reserve
requirements, customer demand for loans, withdrawal of deposit balances and maturities of deposits
and other liabilities. Our primary source of liquidity at our holding company is dividends paid by
our bank subsidiary. Applicable statutes and regulations impose restrictions on the amount of
dividends that may be declared by our bank subsidiary. Further, any dividend payments are subject
to the continuing ability of the bank subsidiary to maintain compliance with minimum federal
regulatory capital requirements and to retain its characterization under federal regulations as a
well-capitalized institution.
Our bank subsidiary has potential obligations resulting from the issuance of standby letters
of credit and commitments to fund future borrowings to our loan customers. Many of these
obligations and commitments to fund future borrowings to our loans customers are expected to expire
without being drawn upon, therefore the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent
future cash requirements affecting our liquidity position.
Liquidity needs can be met from either assets or liabilities. On the asset side, our primary
sources of liquidity include cash and due from banks, federal funds sold, available-for-sale
investment securities and scheduled repayments and maturities of loans. We maintain adequate levels
of cash and cash equivalents to meet our day-to-day needs. As of March 31, 2010, our cash and cash
equivalents were $193.0 million, or 6.3% of total assets, compared to $173.5 million, or 6.5% of
total assets, as of December 31, 2009. Our investment securities and federal funds sold were $373.9
million as of March 31, 2010 and $333.9 million as of December 31, 2009.
We may occasionally use our Fed funds lines of credit in order to temporarily satisfy
short-term liquidity needs. We have Fed funds lines with three other financial institutions
pursuant to which we could have borrowed up to $17.5 million on an unsecured basis as of March 31,
2010 and December 31, 2009. These lines may be terminated by the respective lending institutions at
any time.
We also maintain lines of credit with the Federal Home Loan Bank. Our FHLB borrowed funds were
$254.5 million and $264.4 million at March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively. These
outstanding balances include $20.0 million in short-term advances and $234.5 million in long-term
advances. Our FHLB borrowing capacity was $410.9 million and $418.3 million as of March 31, 2010
and December 31, 2009.
We believe that we have sufficient liquidity to satisfy our current operations.
Market Risk Management. Our primary component of market risk is interest rate volatility.
Fluctuations in interest rates will ultimately impact both the level of income and expense recorded
on a large portion of our assets and liabilities, and the market value of all interest-earning
assets and interest-bearing liabilities, other than those which possess a short term to maturity.
We do not hold market risk sensitive instruments for trading purposes. The information provided
should be read in connection with our audited consolidated financial statements.
Asset/Liability Management. Our management actively measures and manages interest rate risk.
The asset/liability committees of the boards of directors of our holding company and bank
subsidiary are also responsible for approving our asset/liability management policies, overseeing
the formulation and implementation of strategies to improve balance sheet positioning and earnings,
and reviewing our interest rate sensitivity position.
66
Table of Contents
One of the tools that our management uses to measure short-term interest rate risk is a net
interest income simulation model. This analysis calculates the difference between net interest
income forecasted using base market rates and using a rising and a falling interest rate scenario.
The income simulation model includes various assumptions regarding the re-pricing relationships for
each of our products. Many of our assets are floating rate loans, which are assumed to re-price
immediately, and proportional to the change in market rates, depending on their contracted index.
Some loans and investments include the opportunity of prepayment (embedded options), and
accordingly the simulation model uses indexes to estimate these prepayments and reinvest their
proceeds at current yields. Our non-term deposit products re-price more slowly, usually changing
less than the change in market rates and at our discretion.
This analysis indicates the impact of changes in net interest income for the given set of rate
changes and assumptions. It assumes the balance sheet remains static and that its structure does
not change over the course of the year. It does not account for all factors that impact this
analysis, including changes by management to mitigate the impact of interest rate changes or
secondary impacts such as changes to our credit risk profile as interest rates change.
Furthermore, loan prepayment rate estimates and spread relationships change regularly.
Interest rate changes create changes in actual loan prepayment rates that will differ from the
market estimates incorporated in this analysis. Changes that vary significantly from the
assumptions may have significant effects on our net interest income.
Interest Rate Sensitivity. Our primary business is banking and the resulting earnings,
primarily net interest income, are susceptible to changes in market interest rates. It is
managements goal to maximize net interest income within acceptable levels of interest rate and
liquidity risks.
A key element in the financial performance of financial institutions is the level and type of
interest rate risk assumed. The single most significant measure of interest rate risk is the
relationship of the repricing periods of earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities. The more
closely the repricing periods are correlated, the less interest rate risk we assume. We use
repricing gap and simulation modeling as the primary methods in analyzing and managing interest
rate risk.
Gap analysis attempts to capture the amounts and timing of balances exposed to changes in
interest rates at a given point in time. As of March 31, 2010 our one-year cumulative repricing gap
was 11.6%. Part of the funds from our 2009 stock offering proceeds and the excess cash from our
two acquisitions during the first quarter of 2010 have yet to be deployed and increased our
one-year cumulative repricing gap by 5.0%. Excluding these non-deployed funds our gap position as
of March 31, 2010 was asset sensitive with a one-year cumulative repricing gap of 6.6%, compared to
8.1% as of December 31, 2009. During these periods, the amount of change our asset base realizes in
relation to the total change in market interest rate exceeds that of the liability base.
We have a portion of our securities portfolio invested in mortgage-backed securities.
Mortgage-backed securities are included based on their final maturity date. Expected maturities may
differ from contractual maturities because borrowers may have the right to call or prepay
obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties.
67
Table of Contents
Table 23 presents a summary of the repricing schedule of our interest-earning assets and
interest-bearing liabilities (gap) as of March 31, 2010.
Table 23: Interest Rate Sensitivity
Interest Rate Sensitivity Period | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
0-30 | 31-90 | 1-2 | 2-5 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Days | Days | 91-180 Days | 181-365 Days | Years | Years | Over 5 Years | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Earning assets |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest-bearing
deposits due
from banks |
$ | 156,772 | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | 156,772 | ||||||||||||||||
Federal funds
sold |
11,207 | | | | | | | 11,207 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investment
securities |
26,886 | 23,066 | 21,059 | 27,081 | 39,490 | 63,513 | 161,615 | 362,710 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Loans
receivable |
614,677 | 147,963 | 231,930 | 388,050 | 399,788 | 388,411 | 14,732 | 2,185,551 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total earning
assets |
809,542 | 171,029 | 252,989 | 415,131 | 439,278 | 451,924 | 176,347 | 2,716,240 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest-bearing
liabilities |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest-bearing
transaction and
savings
deposits |
28,098 | 56,196 | 84,293 | 168,587 | 153,534 | 142,523 | 230,757 | 863,988 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Time deposits |
105,090 | 168,988 | 281,703 | 262,539 | 99,963 | 84,151 | 3 | 1,002,437 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal funds
purchased |
| | | | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Securities sold
under
repurchase
agreements |
47,093 | | | | 1,108 | 3,324 | 3,878 | 55,403 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
FHLB borrowed
funds |
7,111 | 15,024 | 45,036 | 37,163 | 7,535 | 86,851 | 55,828 | 254,548 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subordinated
debentures |
25,782 | 15 | 15 | | | | 21,650 | 47,462 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total interest-
bearing
liabilities |
213,174 | 240,223 | 411,047 | 468,289 | 262,140 | 316,849 | 312,116 | 2,223,838 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest rate
sensitivity gap |
$ | 596,368 | $ | (69,194 | ) | $ | (158,058 | ) | $ | (53,158 | ) | $ | 177,138 | $ | 135,075 | $ | (135,769 | ) | $ | 492,402 | ||||||||||||
Cumulative
interest rate
sensitivity gap |
$ | 596,368 | $ | 527,174 | $ | 369,116 | $ | 315,958 | $ | 493,096 | $ | 628,171 | $ | 492,402 | ||||||||||||||||||
Cumulative rate
sensitive assets
to rate sensitive
liabilities |
379.8 | % | 216.3 | % | 142.7 | % | 123.7 | % | 130.9 | % | 132.9 | % | 122.1 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
Cumulative gap
as a % of total
earning assets |
22.0 | % | 19.4 | % | 13.6 | % | 11.6 | % | 18.2 | % | 23.1 | % | 18.1 | % |
68
Table of Contents
Item 4: CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Article I. Evaluation of Disclosure Controls
Based on their evaluation as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that the disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934) are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in reports that we
file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and
reported within the time periods specified in Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms.
Additionally, our disclosure controls and procedures were also effective in ensuring that
information required to be disclosed in our Exchange Act report is accumulated and communicated to
our management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer to allow timely
decisions regarding required disclosures.
Article II. Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There have not been any changes in the Companys internal controls over financial reporting
during the quarter ended March 31, 2010, which have materially affected, or are reasonably likely
to materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
PART II: OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
There are no material pending legal proceedings, other than ordinary routine litigation
incidental to its business, to which Home BancShares, Inc. or its subsidiaries are a party or of
which any of their property is the subject.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
Other than the risk factor described below resulting from our recent FDIC-assisted
acquisitions, there were no material changes from the risk factors set forth in Part I, Item 1A,
Risk Factors, of our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009. See the discussion of our
risk factors in the Form 10-K, as filed with the SEC. The risks described are not the only risks
facing the Company. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we
currently deem to be immaterial also may materially adversely affect our business, financial
condition and/or operating results.
Our loss sharing agreements with the FDIC limit our ability to enter into certain change of control
transactions, including the sale of significant amounts of our common stock by us or our
shareholders, without the consent of the FDIC.
The loss sharing agreements we entered into with the FDIC in connection with our acquisitions
of Old Southern Bank and Key West Bank require the consent of the FDIC in connection with certain
change of control transactions, including the sale by the Company or by any individual shareholder,
or group of shareholders acting in concert, of shares of our common stock totaling more than 9% of
our outstanding common stock. This requirement could restrict or delay our ability to raise
additional capital to fund acquisition or growth opportunities or for other purposes, or to pursue
a merger or consolidation transaction that management may believe is in the best interest of our
shareholders. This could also restrict or delay the ability of our shareholders to sell a
substantial amount of our shares. In addition, if such a transaction were to occur without the
FDICs consent, we could lose the benefit of the loss-share coverage provided by these agreements
for certain covered assets.
Item 2: Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
Not applicable.
Item 3: Defaults Upon Senior Securities
Not applicable.
Item 4: (Reserved)
69
Table of Contents
Item 5: Other Information
Not applicable.
Item 6: Exhibits
12.1 | Computation of Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges | ||
15 | Awareness of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm | ||
31.1 | CEO Certification Pursuant Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) | ||
31.2 | CFO Certification Pursuant Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) | ||
32.1 | CEO Certification Pursuant 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002 | ||
32.2 | CFO Certification Pursuant 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002 |
70
Table of Contents
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
HOME BANCSHARES, INC. (Registrant) |
||||
Date: May 10, 2010 | /s/ C. Randall Sims | |||
C. Randall Sims, Chief Executive Officer | ||||
Date: May 10, 2010 | /s/ Randy E. Mayor | |||
Randy E. Mayor, Chief Financial Officer | ||||
71