HOME BANCSHARES INC - Quarter Report: 2011 September (Form 10-Q)
Table of Contents
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, DC 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
þ | Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
For the Quarterly Period Ended September 30, 2011
or
o | Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
For the Transition period from to
Commission File Number: 000-51904
HOME BANCSHARES, INC.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
Arkansas | 71-0682831 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of | (I.R.S. Employer | |
incorporation or organization) | Identification No.) | |
719 Harkrider, Suite 100, Conway, Arkansas | 72032 | |
(Address of principal executive offices) | (Zip Code) |
(501) 328-4770
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Not Applicable
Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a
non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of large accelerated
filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer o | Accelerated filer þ | Non-accelerated filer o | Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the registrants classes of common stock, as
of the latest practical date.
Common Stock Issued and Outstanding: 28,268,186 shares as of October 31, 2011.
HOME BANCSHARES, INC.
FORM 10-Q
September 30, 2011
FORM 10-Q
September 30, 2011
INDEX
Page No. | ||||||||
4 | ||||||||
4 | ||||||||
4 | ||||||||
5 | ||||||||
6-7 | ||||||||
8 | ||||||||
9-35 | ||||||||
36 | ||||||||
37-71 | ||||||||
71-73 | ||||||||
74 | ||||||||
74 | ||||||||
74 | ||||||||
74 | ||||||||
74 | ||||||||
74 | ||||||||
75 | ||||||||
75 | ||||||||
76 | ||||||||
EX-12.1 | ||||||||
EX-15 | ||||||||
EX-31.1 | ||||||||
EX-31.2 | ||||||||
EX-32.1 | ||||||||
EX-32.2 | ||||||||
EX-101 INSTANCE DOCUMENT | ||||||||
EX-101 SCHEMA DOCUMENT | ||||||||
EX-101 CALCULATION LINKBASE DOCUMENT | ||||||||
EX-101 LABELS LINKBASE DOCUMENT | ||||||||
EX-101 PRESENTATION LINKBASE DOCUMENT | ||||||||
EX-101 DEFINITION LINKBASE DOCUMENT |
Exhibit List | ||
12.1
|
Computation of Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges | |
15
|
Awareness of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm | |
31.1
|
CEO Certification Pursuant to 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) | |
31.2
|
CFO Certification Pursuant to 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) | |
32.1
|
CEO Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 | |
32.2
|
CFO Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 | |
101
|
XBRL Documents |
Table of Contents
CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
Some of our statements contained in this document, including matters discussed under the
caption Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation are
forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Forward-looking
statements relate to future events or our future financial performance and include statements about
the competitiveness of the banking industry, potential regulatory obligations, our entrance and
expansion into other markets, our other business strategies and other statements that are not
historical facts. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of performance or results. When we
use words like may, plan, contemplate, anticipate, believe, intend, continue,
expect, project, predict, estimate, could, should, would, and similar expressions,
you should consider them as identifying forward-looking statements, although we may use other
phrasing. These forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties and are based on our
beliefs and assumptions, and on the information available to us at the time that these disclosures
were prepared. These forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties and may not be
realized due to a variety of factors, including, but not limited to, the following:
| the effects of future economic conditions, including inflation or a continued decrease in commercial real estate and residential housing values; | ||
| governmental monetary and fiscal policies, as well as legislative and regulatory changes; | ||
| the impact of the recently enacted Dodd-Frank financial regulatory reform act and regulations to be issued thereunder; | ||
| the risks of changes in interest rates or the level and composition of deposits, loan demand and the values of loan collateral, securities and interest sensitive assets and liabilities; | ||
| the effects of terrorism and efforts to combat it; | ||
| credit risks; | ||
| the effects of competition from other commercial banks, thrifts, mortgage banking firms, consumer finance companies, credit unions, securities brokerage firms, insurance companies, money market and other mutual funds and other financial institutions operating in our market area and elsewhere, including institutions operating regionally, nationally and internationally, together with competitors offering banking products and services by mail, telephone and the Internet; | ||
| the effect of any mergers, acquisitions or other transactions to which we or our subsidiaries may from time to time be a party, including our ability to successfully integrate any businesses that we acquire; | ||
| the failure of assumptions underlying the establishment of our allowance for loan losses; and | ||
| the failure of assumptions underlying the estimates of the fair values for our covered assets and FDIC indemnification receivable. |
All written or oral forward-looking statements attributable to us are expressly qualified in
their entirety by this Cautionary Note. Our actual results may differ significantly from those we
discuss in these forward-looking statements. For other factors, risks and uncertainties that could
cause our actual results to differ materially from estimates and projections contained in these
forward-looking statements, see the Risk Factors section of our Form 10-K filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on March 10, 2011.
Table of Contents
PART I: FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1: Financial Statements
Home BancShares, Inc.
Consolidated Balance Sheets
September 30, | December 31, | |||||||
(In thousands, except share data) | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||
Assets |
||||||||
Cash and due from banks |
$ | 48,748 | $ | 49,927 | ||||
Interest-bearing deposits with other banks |
104,053 | 237,605 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
152,801 | 287,532 | ||||||
Federal funds sold |
3,670 | 27,848 | ||||||
Investment securities available for sale |
610,522 | 469,864 | ||||||
Loans receivable not covered by loss share |
1,826,373 | 1,892,374 | ||||||
Loans receivable covered by FDIC loss share |
511,326 | 575,776 | ||||||
Allowance for loan losses |
(54,508 | ) | (53,348 | ) | ||||
Loans receivable, net |
2,283,191 | 2,414,802 | ||||||
Bank premises and equipment, net |
89,894 | 81,939 | ||||||
Foreclosed assets held for sale not covered by loss share |
16,541 | 11,626 | ||||||
Foreclosed assets held for sale covered by FDIC loss share |
32,183 | 21,568 | ||||||
FDIC indemnification asset |
201,211 | 227,258 | ||||||
Cash value of life insurance |
52,422 | 51,970 | ||||||
Accrued interest receivable |
15,038 | 16,176 | ||||||
Deferred tax asset, net |
21,998 | 18,586 | ||||||
Goodwill |
59,663 | 59,663 | ||||||
Core deposit and other intangibles |
9,325 | 11,447 | ||||||
Other assets |
73,707 | 62,367 | ||||||
Total assets |
$ | 3,622,166 | $ | 3,762,646 | ||||
Liabilities and Stockholders Equity |
||||||||
Deposits: |
||||||||
Demand and non-interest-bearing |
$ | 479,512 | $ | 392,622 | ||||
Savings and interest-bearing transaction accounts |
1,143,335 | 1,108,309 | ||||||
Time deposits |
1,262,202 | 1,460,867 | ||||||
Total deposits |
2,885,049 | 2,961,798 | ||||||
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase |
62,407 | 74,459 | ||||||
FHLB borrowed funds |
142,901 | 177,270 | ||||||
Accrued interest payable and other liabilities |
24,339 | 27,863 | ||||||
Subordinated debentures |
44,331 | 44,331 | ||||||
Total liabilities |
3,159,027 | 3,285,721 | ||||||
Stockholders equity: |
||||||||
Preferred stock; $0.01 par value; 5,500,000 shares authorized: |
||||||||
Series A fixed rate cumulative perpetual; liquidation
preference of $1,000 per share; zero shares issued or outstanding at
September 30, 2011; 50,000 shares issued and outstanding at December
31, 2010. |
| 49,456 | ||||||
Common stock, par value $0.01; shares authorized 50,000,000;
shares issued and outstanding 28,259,044 in 2011 and
28,452,411 in 2010 |
283 | 285 | ||||||
Capital surplus |
425,852 | 432,962 | ||||||
Retained earnings (deficit) |
28,218 | (6,079 | ) | |||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
8,786 | 301 | ||||||
Total stockholders equity |
463,139 | 476,925 | ||||||
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
$ | 3,622,166 | $ | 3,762,646 | ||||
See Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. 4
Table of Contents
Home BancShares, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Income
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||
(In thousands, except per share data) | 2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||||||||||
Interest income: |
||||||||||||||||
Loans |
$ | 39,199 | $ | 35,673 | $ | 117,844 | $ | 98,675 | ||||||||
Investment securities |
||||||||||||||||
Taxable |
2,429 | 1,802 | 6,793 | 5,364 | ||||||||||||
Tax-exempt |
1,546 | 1,492 | 4,617 | 4,471 | ||||||||||||
Deposits other banks |
84 | 92 | 331 | 258 | ||||||||||||
Federal funds sold |
1 | 3 | 9 | 13 | ||||||||||||
Total interest income |
43,259 | 39,062 | 129,594 | 108,781 | ||||||||||||
Interest expense: |
||||||||||||||||
Interest on deposits |
5,638 | 6,319 | 17,884 | 17,486 | ||||||||||||
FHLB borrowed funds |
1,250 | 1,854 | 3,768 | 6,113 | ||||||||||||
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase |
120 | 137 | 384 | 349 | ||||||||||||
Subordinated debentures |
539 | 599 | 1,620 | 1,796 | ||||||||||||
Total interest expense |
7,547 | 8,909 | 23,656 | 25,744 | ||||||||||||
Net interest income |
35,712 | 30,153 | 105,938 | 83,037 | ||||||||||||
Provision for loan losses |
| 3,000 | 1,250 | 9,850 | ||||||||||||
Net interest income after provision for loan losses |
35,712 | 27,153 | 104,688 | 73,187 | ||||||||||||
Non-interest income: |
||||||||||||||||
Service charges on deposit accounts |
3,638 | 3,551 | 10,428 | 10,275 | ||||||||||||
Other service charges and fees |
2,489 | 1,816 | 7,375 | 5,353 | ||||||||||||
Mortgage lending income |
783 | 760 | 2,089 | 1,822 | ||||||||||||
Mortgage servicing income |
| | | 314 | ||||||||||||
Insurance commissions |
428 | 248 | 1,505 | 904 | ||||||||||||
Income from title services |
126 | 98 | 327 | 353 | ||||||||||||
Increase in cash value of life insurance |
323 | 330 | 849 | 1,106 | ||||||||||||
Dividends from FHLB, FRB & bankers bank |
184 | 151 | 506 | 419 | ||||||||||||
Gain on acquisitions |
| | | 9,334 | ||||||||||||
Gain on sale of SBA loans |
| | 259 | 18 | ||||||||||||
Gain (loss) on sale of premises and equipment, net |
6 | 2 | 79 | 221 | ||||||||||||
Gain (loss) on OREO, net |
69 | (1,063 | ) | (1,032 | ) | (1,308 | ) | |||||||||
Gain (loss) on securities, net |
5 | (37 | ) | 5 | (37 | ) | ||||||||||
FDIC indemnification asset |
1,314 | 1,895 | 4,614 | 2,631 | ||||||||||||
Other income |
595 | 556 | 2,123 | 1,767 | ||||||||||||
Total non-interest income |
9,960 | 8,307 | 29,127 | 33,172 | ||||||||||||
Non-interest expense: |
||||||||||||||||
Salaries and employee benefits |
10,691 | 9,637 | 32,449 | 27,251 | ||||||||||||
Occupancy and equipment |
3,562 | 3,264 | 10,923 | 9,036 | ||||||||||||
Data processing expense |
1,185 | 848 | 3,607 | 2,664 | ||||||||||||
Other operating expenses |
8,298 | 7,545 | 24,474 | 19,888 | ||||||||||||
Total non-interest expense |
23,736 | 21,294 | 71,453 | 58,839 | ||||||||||||
Income before income taxes |
21,936 | 14,166 | 62,362 | 47,520 | ||||||||||||
Income tax expense |
7,624 | 4,606 | 21,788 | 16,122 | ||||||||||||
Net income available to all stockholders |
14,312 | 9,560 | 40,574 | 31,398 | ||||||||||||
Preferred stock dividends and accretion of discount
on preferred stock |
488 | 670 | 1,828 | 2,010 | ||||||||||||
Net income available to common stockholders |
$ | 13,824 | $ | 8,890 | $ | 38,746 | $ | 29,388 | ||||||||
Basic earnings per common share |
$ | 0.48 | $ | 0.32 | $ | 1.36 | $ | 1.04 | ||||||||
Diluted earnings per common share |
$ | 0.48 | $ | 0.31 | $ | 1.35 | $ | 1.03 | ||||||||
See Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. 5
Table of Contents
Home BancShares, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders Equity
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2011 and 2010
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2011 and 2010
Accumulated | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Retained | Other | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Earnings | Comprehensive | |||||||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands, except share data) | Preferred Stock | Common Stock | Capital Surplus | (Deficit) | Income (Loss) | Total | ||||||||||||||||||
Balance at January 1, 2010 |
$ | 49,275 | $ | 257 | $ | 363,519 | $ | 51,746 | $ | 176 | $ | 464,973 | ||||||||||||
Comprehensive income: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income |
| | | 31,398 | | 31,398 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other comprehensive income: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Unrealized gain on investment securities
available for sale, net of tax
effect of $3,872 |
| | | | 5,995 | 5,995 | ||||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive income |
37,393 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Accretion of discount on preferred stock |
136 | | | (136 | ) | | | |||||||||||||||||
Net issuance of 156,069 shares of common stock
from
exercise of stock options |
| 2 | 1,411 | | | 1,413 | ||||||||||||||||||
Disgorgement of profits |
| | 11 | | | 11 | ||||||||||||||||||
Tax benefit from stock options exercised |
| | 863 | | | 863 | ||||||||||||||||||
Share-based compensation |
| | 324 | | | 324 | ||||||||||||||||||
Cash dividend Preferred Stock - 5% |
| | | (1,875 | ) | | (1,875 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Cash dividends Common Stock, $0.1625 per share |
| | | (4,623 | ) | | (4,623 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Stock dividend Common Stock 10% |
| 25 | 66,540 | (66,576 | ) | | (11 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Balances at September 30, 2010 (unaudited) |
49,411 | 284 | 432,668 | 9,934 | 6,171 | 498,468 | ||||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive income: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income |
| | | (13,807 | ) | | (13,807 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Other comprehensive income: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Unrealized loss on investment securities
available for sale, net of tax
effect of $(3,792) |
| | | | (5,870 | ) | (5,870 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive income |
(19,677 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Accretion of discount on preferred stock |
45 | | | (45 | ) | | | |||||||||||||||||
Net issuance of 18,829 shares of common stock
from exercise of stock options |
| 1 | 141 | | | 142 | ||||||||||||||||||
Tax benefit from stock options exercised |
| | 101 | | | 101 | ||||||||||||||||||
Share-based compensation |
| | 52 | | | 52 | ||||||||||||||||||
Cash dividends Preferred stock - 5% |
| | | (625 | ) | | (625 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Cash dividends Common Stock, $0.054 per share |
| | | (1,536 | ) | | (1,536 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Balances at December 31, 2010 |
49,456 | 285 | 432,962 | (6,079 | ) | 301 | 476,925 |
See Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. 6
Table of Contents
Home BancShares, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders Equity Continued
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2011 and 2010
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders Equity Continued
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2011 and 2010
Accumulated | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Retained | Other | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Earnings | Comprehensive | |||||||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands, except share data) | Preferred Stock | Common Stock | Capital Surplus | (Deficit) | Income (Loss) | Total | ||||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive income: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income |
| | | 40,574 | | 40,574 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other comprehensive income: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Unrealized gain on investment securities
available for sale, net of tax
effect of $5,478 |
| | | | 8,485 | 8,485 | ||||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive income |
49,059 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Repurchase of 50,000 shares of preferred stock
and common stock warrant |
(50,000 | ) | | (2,206 | ) | 906 | | (51,300 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Accretion of discount on preferred stock |
544 | | | (544 | ) | | | |||||||||||||||||
Net issuance of 24,477 shares of common stock
from
exercise of stock options |
| | 227 | | | 227 | ||||||||||||||||||
Repurchase of common stock |
| (2 | ) | (5,542 | ) | | | (5,544 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Tax benefit from stock options exercised |
| | 126 | | | 126 | ||||||||||||||||||
Share-based compensation |
| | 285 | | | 285 | ||||||||||||||||||
Cash dividends Preferred stock - 5% |
| | | (1,286 | ) | | (1,286 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Cash dividends Common Stock, $0.188 per share |
| | | (5,353 | ) | | (5,353 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Balances at September 30, 2011 (unaudited) |
$ | | $ | 283 | $ | 425,852 | $ | 28,218 | $ | 8,786 | $ | 463,139 | ||||||||||||
See Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. 7
Table of Contents
Home BancShares, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Period Ended September 30, | ||||||||
(In thousands) | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||
Operating Activities |
||||||||
Net income |
$ | 40,574 | $ | 31,398 | ||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by (used in)
operating activities: |
||||||||
Depreciation |
4,943 | 3,945 | ||||||
Amortization/(accretion) |
489 | 52 | ||||||
Share-based compensation |
285 | 324 | ||||||
Tax benefits from stock options exercised |
(126 | ) | (863 | ) | ||||
(Gain) loss on assets |
645 | 969 | ||||||
Gain on acquisitions |
| (9,334 | ) | |||||
Provision for loan losses |
1,250 | 9,850 | ||||||
Deferred income tax effect |
(8,890 | ) | 2,100 | |||||
Increase in cash value of life insurance |
(849 | ) | (1,106 | ) | ||||
Originations of mortgage loans held for sale |
(82,239 | ) | (94,415 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from sales of mortgage loans held for sale |
85,562 | 79,856 | ||||||
Changes in assets and liabilities: |
||||||||
Accrued interest receivable |
1,138 | (2,132 | ) | |||||
Other assets |
19,326 | 9,913 | ||||||
Accrued interest payable and other liabilities |
(3,398 | ) | 5,397 | |||||
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities |
58,710 | 35,954 | ||||||
Investing Activities |
||||||||
Net (increase) decrease in federal funds sold |
24,178 | 14,039 | ||||||
Net (increase) decrease in loans net, excluding loans acquired |
79,214 | 10,019 | ||||||
Purchases of investment securities available for sale |
(262,286 | ) | (113,721 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from maturities of investment securities available for sale |
132,044 | 107,855 | ||||||
Proceeds from sale of investment securities available for sale |
566 | 5,539 | ||||||
Proceeds from foreclosed assets held for sale |
26,738 | 14,879 | ||||||
Proceeds from sale of SBA loans |
4,524 | 268 | ||||||
Sale of mortgage servicing portfolio |
| 225 | ||||||
Purchases of premises and equipment, net |
(12,819 | ) | (7,722 | ) | ||||
Death benefits received |
700 | 1,585 | ||||||
Net cash proceeds received in FDIC-assisted acquisitions |
| 160,587 | ||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities |
(7,141 | ) | 193,553 | |||||
Financing Activities |
||||||||
Net increase (decrease) in deposits, net of deposits acquired |
(76,749 | ) | (90,829 | ) | ||||
Net increase (decrease) in securities sold under agreements to repurchase |
(12,052 | ) | 11,015 | |||||
Net increase (decrease) in FHLB and other borrowed funds, net of acquired |
(34,369 | ) | (107,642 | ) | ||||
Retirement of subordinated debentures |
| (3,252 | ) | |||||
Proceeds from exercise of stock options |
227 | 1,413 | ||||||
Repurchase of common stock |
(5,544 | ) | | |||||
Repurchase of preferred stock and common stock warrant |
(51,300 | ) | | |||||
Disgorgement of profits |
| 11 | ||||||
Tax benefits from stock options exercised |
126 | 863 | ||||||
Dividends paid on preferred stock |
(1,286 | ) | (1,875 | ) | ||||
Dividends paid on common stock |
(5,353 | ) | (4,634 | ) | ||||
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
(186,300 | ) | (194,930 | ) | ||||
Net change in cash and cash equivalents |
(134,731 | ) | 34,577 | |||||
Cash and cash equivalents beginning of year |
287,532 | 173,490 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents end of period |
$ | 152,801 | $ | 208,067 | ||||
See Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. 8
Table of Contents
Home BancShares, Inc.
Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
1: Nature of Operations and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Nature of Operations
Home BancShares, Inc. (the Company or HBI) is a bank holding company headquartered in Conway,
Arkansas. The Company is primarily engaged in providing a full range of banking services to
individual and corporate customers through its wholly owned community bank subsidiary Centennial
Bank (the Bank). The Bank has locations in central Arkansas, north central Arkansas, southern
Arkansas, the Florida Keys, central Florida, southwestern Florida and the Florida Panhandle. The
Company is subject to competition from other financial institutions. The Company also is subject to
the regulation of certain federal and state agencies and undergoes periodic examinations by those
regulatory authorities.
A summary of the significant accounting policies of the Company follows:
Operating Segments
Operating segments are components of an enterprise about which separate financial information
is available that is evaluated regularly by the chief operating decision maker in deciding how to
allocate resources and in assessing performance. The Bank is the only significant subsidiary upon
which management makes decisions regarding how to allocate resources and assess performance. Each
of the branches of the Bank provide a group of similar community banking services, including such
products and services as commercial, real estate and consumer loans, time deposits, checking and
savings accounts. The individual bank branches have similar operating and economic characteristics.
While the chief decision maker monitors the revenue streams of the various products, services and
branch locations, operations are managed and financial performance is evaluated on a Company-wide
basis. Accordingly, all of the community banking services and branch locations are considered by
management to be aggregated into one reportable operating segment, community banking.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and
liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and
expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Material estimates that are particularly susceptible to significant change relate to the
determination of the allowance for loan losses, the valuation of foreclosed assets, the valuations
of covered loans and the related indemnification asset. In connection with the determination of the
allowance for loan losses and the valuation of foreclosed assets, management obtains independent
appraisals for significant properties.
Principles of Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of HBI and its subsidiaries.
Significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
Reclassifications
Various items within the accompanying consolidated financial statements for previous years
have been reclassified to provide more comparative information. These reclassifications had no
effect on net income or stockholders equity.
9
Table of Contents
Loans Receivable Not Covered by Loss Share and Allowance for Loan Losses
Loans receivable not covered by loss share that management has the intent and ability to hold
for the foreseeable future or until maturity or payoff are reported at their outstanding principal
balance adjusted for any charge-offs, deferred fees or costs on originated loans. Interest income
on loans is accrued over the term of the loans based on the principal balance outstanding. Loan
origination fees and direct origination costs are capitalized and recognized as adjustments to
yield on the related loans.
The allowance for loan losses is established through a provision for loan losses charged
against income. The allowance represents an amount that, in managements judgment, will be adequate
to absorb probable credit losses on existing loans that may become uncollectible and probable
credit losses inherent in the remainder of the loan portfolio. The amounts of provisions to the
allowance for loan losses are based on managements analysis and evaluation of the loan portfolio
for identification of problem credits, internal and external factors that may affect
collectability, relevant credit exposure, particular risks inherent in different kinds of lending,
current collateral values and other relevant factors.
The allowance consists of allocated and general components. The allocated component relates
to loans that are classified as impaired. For those loans that are classified as impaired, an
allowance is established when the discounted cash flows, or collateral value or observable market
price of the impaired loan is lower than the carrying value of that loan. The general component
covers non-classified loans and is based on historical charge-off experience and expected loss
given default derived from the Banks internal risk rating process. Other adjustments may be made
to the allowance for pools of loans after an assessment of internal or external influences on
credit quality that are not fully reflected in the historical loss or risking rating data.
Loans considered impaired, under FASB ASC 310-10-35, are loans for which, based on current
information and events, it is probable that the Company will be unable to collect all amounts due
according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. The aggregate amount of impairment of
loans is utilized in evaluating the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses and amount of
provisions thereto. Losses on impaired loans are charged against the allowance for loan losses when
in the process of collection it appears likely that such losses will be realized. The accrual of
interest on impaired loans is discontinued when, in managements opinion, the collection of
interest is doubtful, or generally when loans are 90 days or more past due. When accrual of
interest is discontinued, all unpaid accrued interest is reversed. Interest income is subsequently
recognized only to the extent cash payments are received in excess of principal due. Loans are
returned to accrual status when all the principal and interest amounts contractually due are
brought current and future payments are reasonably assured.
Groups of loans with similar risk characteristics are collectively evaluated for impairment
based on the groups historical loss experience adjusted for changes in trends, conditions and
other relevant factors that affect repayment of the loans.
Loans are placed on non-accrual status when management believes that the borrowers financial
condition, after giving consideration to economic and business conditions and collection efforts,
is such that collection of interest is doubtful, or generally when loans are 90 days or more past
due. Loans are charged against the allowance for loan losses when management believes that the
collectability of the principal is unlikely. Accrued interest related to non-accrual loans is
generally charged against the allowance for loan losses when accrued in prior years and reversed
from interest income if accrued in the current year. Interest income on non-accrual loans may be
recognized to the extent cash payments are received, but payments received are usually applied to
principal. Non-accrual loans are generally returned to accrual status when principal and interest
payments are less than 90 days past due, the customer has made required payments for at least six
months, and the Company reasonably expects to collect all principal and interest.
10
Table of Contents
Trouble Debt Restructurings
The Company accounts for troubled debt restructurings (TDRs) using ASC Topic 310-40, Troubled
Debt Restructurings by Creditors. Restructuring of a debt constitutes a troubled debt
restructuring if the Company, for economic or legal reasons related to the debtors financial
difficulties, grants a concession to the debtor that it would not otherwise consider. Common
concessions granted to borrowers include interest rate and/or term modifications. As a result, the
Bank will work with the borrower to prevent further difficulties, and ultimately to improve the
likelihood of recovery on the loan. All TDRs are considered to be impaired loans.
A loan modification does not result in a TDR unless the borrower is in financial difficulty
and a concession has been granted. In determining whether a concession has been granted, the
Company takes into account the extent to which the nature and amount of any additional collateral
or guarantees received as part of the modifications do not serve as adequate compensation for other
terms of the restructuring. If the additional collateral or guarantees received adequately
compensate the Company for the concessions granted, the loan is not classified as a TDR.
Interim financial information
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements as of September 30, 2011 and 2010
have been prepared in condensed format, and therefore do not include all of the information and
footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for
complete financial statements.
The information furnished in these interim statements reflects all adjustments, which are, in
the opinion of management, necessary for a fair statement of the results for each respective period
presented. Such adjustments are of a normal recurring nature. The results of operations in the
interim statements are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for any other
quarter or for the full year. The interim financial information should be read in conjunction with
the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Companys 2010 Form 10-K,
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Earnings per Share
Basic earnings per common share are computed based on the weighted average number of shares
outstanding during each year. Diluted earnings per common share are computed using the weighted
average common shares and all potential dilutive common shares outstanding during the period. The
following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per common share (EPS) for
the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30:
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Net income available to stockholders |
$ | 13,824 | $ | 8,890 | $ | 38,746 | $ | 29,388 | ||||||||
Average shares outstanding |
28,434 | 28,403 | 28,464 | 28,334 | ||||||||||||
Effect of common stock options |
199 | 241 | 201 | 246 | ||||||||||||
Diluted shares outstanding |
28,633 | 28,644 | 28,665 | 28,580 | ||||||||||||
Basic earnings per common share |
$ | 0.48 | $ | 0.32 | $ | 1.36 | $ | 1.04 | ||||||||
Diluted earnings per common share |
$ | 0.48 | $ | 0.31 | $ | 1.35 | $ | 1.03 |
11
Table of Contents
2: Business Combinations
Acquisition Old Southern Bank
On March 12, 2010, Centennial Bank entered into a purchase and assumption agreement (Old
Southern Agreement) with the FDIC, as receiver, pursuant to which Centennial Bank acquired certain
assets and assumed substantially all of the deposits and certain liabilities of Old Southern Bank
(Old Southern).
Prior to the acquisition, Old Southern operated 7 banking centers in the Orlando, Florida
metropolitan area. The Company has kept open all of these locations except for one location in
downtown Orlando. Including the effects of purchase accounting adjustments, Centennial Bank
acquired $342.6 million in assets and assumed approximately $328.5 million of the deposits of Old
Southern. Additionally, Centennial Bank purchased covered loans with an estimated fair value of
$179.1 million, $3.0 million of foreclosed assets and $30.4 million of investment securities.
See Note 2 Business Combinations of Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (SEC) in March 2011 for additional discussion related to the acquisition of Old
Southern.
Acquisition Key West Bank
On March 26, 2010, Centennial Bank, entered into a purchase and assumption agreement (Key West
Bank Agreement) with the FDIC, as receiver, pursuant to which Centennial Bank acquired certain
assets and assumed substantially all of the deposits and certain liabilities of Key West Bank (Key
West).
Prior to the acquisition, Key West operated one banking center located in Key West, Florida.
Including the effects of purchase accounting adjustments, Centennial Bank acquired $89.6 million in
assets and assumed approximately $66.7 million of the deposits of Key West. Additionally,
Centennial Bank purchased covered loans with an estimated fair value of $46.9 million, $5.7 million
of foreclosed assets and assumed $20.0 million of FHLB advances.
See Note 2 Business Combinations of Form 10-K filed with the SEC in March 2011 for
additional discussion related to the acquisition of Key West.
Acquisition Coastal Community Bank and Bayside Savings Bank
On July 30, 2010, Centennial Bank entered into separate purchase and assumption agreements
with the FDIC (collectively, the Coastal-Bayside Agreements), as receiver for each bank, pursuant
to which Centennial Bank acquired the loans and certain assets and assumed the deposits and certain
liabilities of Coastal Community Bank (Coastal) and Bayside Savings Bank (Bayside), respectively.
These two institutions had been under common ownership of Coastal Community Investments, Inc.
Prior to the acquisition, Coastal and Bayside operated 12 banking centers in the Florida
Panhandle area. Including the effects of purchase accounting adjustments, Centennial Bank acquired
$436.8 million in assets and assumed approximately $424.6 million of the deposits of Coastal and
Bayside. Additionally, Centennial Bank purchased covered loans with an estimated fair value of
$200.6 million, non-covered loans with an estimated fair value of $4.1 million, $9.6 million of
foreclosed assets and $18.5 million of investment securities.
See Note 2 Business Combinations of Form 10-K filed with the SEC in March 2011 for
additional discussion related to the acquisition of Coastal and Bayside.
12
Table of Contents
Acquisition Wakulla Bank
On October 1, 2010, Centennial Bank entered into a purchase and assumption agreement with the
FDIC, as receiver, pursuant to which Centennial Bank acquired the performing loans and certain
assets and assumed substantially all of the deposits and certain liabilities of Wakulla Bank
(Wakulla).
Prior to the acquisition, Wakulla operated 12 banking centers in the Florida Panhandle.
Including the effects of purchase accounting adjustments, Centennial Bank acquired approximately
$377.9 million in assets and assumed approximately $356.2 million in deposits of Wakulla.
Additionally, Centennial Bank purchased performing covered loans of approximately $148.2 million,
performing non-covered loans with an estimated fair value of $17.6 million, $45.9 million of
marketable securities and $27.6 million of federal funds sold.
See Note 2 Business Combinations of Form 10-K filed with the SEC in March 2011 for
additional discussion related to the acquisition of Wakulla.
Acquisition Gulf State Community Bank
On November 19, 2010, Centennial Bank entered into a purchase and assumption agreement with
the FDIC, as receiver, pursuant to which Centennial Bank acquired the loans and certain assets and
assumed substantially all of the deposits and certain liabilities of Gulf State Community Bank
(Gulf State).
Prior to the acquisition, Gulf State operated 5 banking centers in the Florida Panhandle.
Including the effects of purchase accounting adjustments, Centennial Bank acquired approximately
$118.2 million in assets and assumed approximately $97.7 million in deposits of Gulf State.
Additionally, Centennial Bank purchased covered loans with an estimated fair value of $41.2
million, non-covered loans with an estimated fair value of $1.7 million, $4.7 million of foreclosed
assets and $10.8 million of investment securities.
See Note 2 Business Combinations of Form 10-K filed with the SEC in March 2011 for
additional discussion related to the acquisition of Gulf State.
FDIC-Assisted Acquisitions Other Matters
The Companys operating results for 2010, include the operating results of the acquired assets
and assumed liabilities subsequent to the respective acquisition dates. Due to the significant fair
value adjustments recorded, as well as the nature of the FDIC loss sharing agreements in place,
historical results are not believed to be relevant to the Companys results, and thus no pro forma
information is presented.
In an FDIC-assisted acquisition, we acquire certain assets and assume certain liabilities of
the former institution under a loss share agreement with the FDIC. Any regulatory agreements or
orders that existed for the former institution do not apply to the assuming institution. We, as the
assuming institution, are evaluated separately by our regulators and any weaknesses of the former
institution are considered in the separate evaluation. Also, the loss share agreement helps to
mitigate any weaknesses that may have existed in the former institution.
13
Table of Contents
3: Investment Securities
The amortized cost and estimated market value of investment securities were as follows:
September 30, 2011 | ||||||||||||||||
Available for Sale | ||||||||||||||||
Gross Unrealized | Gross Unrealized | |||||||||||||||
Amortized Cost | Gains | (Losses) | Estimated Fair Value | |||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
U.S. government-sponsored enterprises |
$ | 295,765 | $ | 4,085 | $ | (58 | ) | $ | 299,792 | |||||||
Mortgage-backed securities |
125,974 | 4,323 | (3 | ) | 130,294 | |||||||||||
State and political subdivisions |
160,035 | 6,190 | (29 | ) | 166,196 | |||||||||||
Other securities |
14,291 | | (51 | ) | 14,240 | |||||||||||
Total |
$ | 596,065 | $ | 14,598 | $ | (141 | ) | $ | 610,522 | |||||||
December 31, 2010 | ||||||||||||||||
Available for Sale | ||||||||||||||||
Gross Unrealized | Gross Unrealized | |||||||||||||||
Amortized Cost | Gains | (Losses) | Estimated Fair Value | |||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
U.S. government-sponsored enterprises |
$ | 198,248 | $ | 977 | $ | (1,932 | ) | $ | 197,293 | |||||||
Mortgage-backed securities |
113,557 | 2,820 | (300 | ) | 116,077 | |||||||||||
State and political subdivisions |
154,706 | 1,458 | (2,457 | ) | 153,707 | |||||||||||
Other securities |
2,858 | | (71 | ) | 2,787 | |||||||||||
Total |
$ | 469,369 | $ | 5,255 | $ | (4,760 | ) | $ | 469,864 | |||||||
Assets, principally investment securities, having a carrying value of approximately $370.4
million and $268.0 million at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively, were pledged
to secure public deposits and for other purposes required or permitted by law. Also, investment
securities pledged as collateral for repurchase agreements totaled approximately $62.4 million and
$74.5 million at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively.
During the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2011 $561,000 of available
for sale securities were sold. The gross realized gains on these sales totaled approximately
$5,000. The income tax expense/benefit to net security gains and losses was 39.225% of the gross
amounts.
During the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2010 approximately $5.6
million of available for sale securities were sold. The gross realized gains and losses on these
sales totaled approximately $34,000 and $1,000 respectively. The income tax expense/benefit to net
security gains and losses was 39.225% of the gross amounts.
The amortized cost and estimated fair value of securities at September 30, 2011, by
contractual maturity, are shown below. Expected maturities will differ from contractual maturities
because issuers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment
penalties.
14
Table of Contents
Available-for-Sale | ||||||||
Amortized | Estimated | |||||||
Cost | Fair Value | |||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Due in one year or less |
$ | 249,870 | $ | 252,399 | ||||
Due after one year through five years |
247,072 | 253,423 | ||||||
Due after five years through ten years |
74,110 | 78,419 | ||||||
Due after ten years |
25,013 | 26,281 | ||||||
Total |
$ | 596,065 | $ | 610,522 | ||||
For purposes of the maturity tables, mortgage-backed securities, which are not due at a single
maturity date, have been allocated over maturity groupings based on anticipated maturities. The
mortgage-backed securities may mature earlier than their weighted-average contractual maturities
because of principal prepayments.
The Company evaluates all securities quarterly to determine if any unrealized losses are
deemed to be other than temporary. In completing these evaluations the Company follows the
requirements of FASB ASC 320, Investments Debt and Equity Securities. Certain investment
securities are valued less than their historical cost. These declines are primarily the result of
the rate for these investments yielding less than current market rates. Based on evaluation of
available evidence, management believes the declines in fair value for these securities are
temporary. The Company does not intend to sell or believe it will be required to sell these
investments before recovery of their amortized cost bases, which may be maturity. Should the
impairment of any of these securities become other than temporary, the cost basis of the investment
will be reduced and the resulting loss recognized in net income in the period the
other-than-temporary impairment is identified.
During the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2011, no securities were deemed to
have other-than-temporary impairment besides securities for which impairment was taken in prior
periods.
For the period ended September 30, 2011, the Company had $42,000 in unrealized losses, which
have been in continuous loss positions for more than twelve months. Excluding impairment write
downs taken in prior periods, the Companys assessments indicated that the cause of the market
depreciation was primarily the change in interest rates and not the issuers financial condition,
or downgrades by rating agencies. In addition, approximately 83.4% of the Companys investment
portfolio matures in five years or less. As a result, the Company has the ability and intent to
hold such securities until maturity.
The following shows gross unrealized losses and estimated fair value of investment securities
available for sale, aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual investment
securities have been in a continuous loss position as of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010:
September 30, 2011 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Less Than 12 Months | 12 Months or More | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Fair | Unrealized | Fair | Unrealized | Fair | Unrealized | |||||||||||||||||||
Value | Losses | Value | Losses | Value | Losses | |||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. government-sponsored
enterprises |
$ | 18,578 | $ | (40 | ) | $ | 2,058 | $ | (18 | ) | $ | 20,636 | $ | (58 | ) | |||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities |
4,094 | (3 | ) | | | 4,094 | (3 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
State and political subdivisions |
960 | (5 | ) | 1,348 | (24 | ) | 2,308 | (29 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Other securities |
9,761 | (51 | ) | | | 9,761 | (51 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 33,393 | $ | (99 | ) | $ | 3,406 | $ | (42 | ) | $ | 36,799 | $ | (141 | ) | |||||||||
15
Table of Contents
December 31, 2010 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Less Than 12 Months | 12 Months or More | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Fair | Unrealized | Fair | Unrealized | Fair | Unrealized | |||||||||||||||||||
Value | Losses | Value | Losses | Value | Losses | |||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. government-sponsored
enterprises |
$ | 126,862 | $ | (1,932 | ) | $ | | $ | | $ | 126,862 | $ | (1,932 | ) | ||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities |
27,427 | (300 | ) | | | 27,427 | (300 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
State and political subdivisions |
57,272 | (1,970 | ) | 4,069 | (487 | ) | 61,341 | (2,457 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Other securities |
| | 2,667 | (71 | ) | 2,667 | (71 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 211,561 | $ | (4,202 | ) | $ | 6,736 | $ | (558 | ) | $ | 218,297 | $ | (4,760 | ) | |||||||||
4: Loans Receivable Not Covered by Loss Share and Allowance for Loan Losses
The various categories of loans not covered by loss share are summarized as follows:
September 30, | December 31, | |||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Real estate: |
||||||||
Commercial real estate loans |
||||||||
Non-farm/non-residential |
$ | 744,749 | $ | 805,635 | ||||
Construction/land development |
366,926 | 348,768 | ||||||
Agricultural |
26,683 | 26,798 | ||||||
Residential real estate loans |
||||||||
Residential 1-4 family |
353,110 | 371,381 | ||||||
Multifamily residential |
59,974 | 59,319 | ||||||
Total real estate |
1,551,442 | 1,611,901 | ||||||
Consumer |
40,225 | 51,642 | ||||||
Commercial and industrial |
170,695 | 184,014 | ||||||
Agricultural |
35,238 | 16,549 | ||||||
Other |
28,773 | 28,268 | ||||||
Loans receivable not covered by loss share |
$ | 1,826,373 | $ | 1,892,374 | ||||
16
Table of Contents
The following tables present the balance in the allowance for loan losses for the three-month
and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2011, and the allowance for loan losses and recorded
investment in loans based on portfolio segment by impairment method as of September 30, 2011.
Allocation of a portion of the allowance to one type of loans does not preclude its availability to
absorb losses in other categories.
Three Months Ended September 30, 2011 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Construction/ | Commercial Real | Residential | Commercial | Consumer | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Land Development | Estate | Real Estate | & Industrial | & Other | Unallocated | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Allowance for loan losses: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Beginning balance |
$ | 11,318 | $ | 19,141 | $ | 14,324 | $ | 7,119 | $ | 2,450 | $ | 2,432 | $ | 56,784 | ||||||||||||||
Loans charged off |
(3,166 | ) | (645 | ) | (1,778 | ) | (140 | ) | (641 | ) | | (6,370 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Recoveries of loans previously
charged off |
741 | 41 | 2,030 | 1,161 | 121 | | 4,094 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Net loans recovered (charged off) |
(2,425 | ) | (604 | ) | 252 | 1,021 | (520 | ) | | (2,276 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Provision for loan losses |
(850 | ) | 4,258 | (1,748 | ) | (1,704 | ) | 62 | (18 | ) | | |||||||||||||||||
Balance, September 30 |
$ | 8,043 | $ | 22,795 | $ | 12,828 | $ | 6,436 | $ | 1,992 | $ | 2,414 | $ | 54,508 | ||||||||||||||
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2011 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Construction/ | Commercial Real | Residential | Commercial | Consumer | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Land Development | Estate | Real Estate | & Industrial | & Other | Unallocated | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Allowance for loan losses: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Beginning balance |
$ | 12,002 | $ | 17,247 | $ | 14,297 | $ | 6,357 | $ | 1,022 | $ | 2,423 | $ | 53,348 | ||||||||||||||
Loans charged off |
(3,397 | ) | (665 | ) | (2,562 | ) | (292 | ) | (2,636 | ) | | (9,552 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Recoveries of loans previously
charged off |
747 | 204 | 2,278 | 5,777 | 456 | | 9,462 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Net loans recovered (charged off) |
(2,650 | ) | (461 | ) | (284 | ) | 5,485 | (2,180 | ) | | (90 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Provision for loan losses |
(1,309 | ) | 6,009 | (1,185 | ) | (5,406 | ) | 3,150 | (9 | ) | 1,250 | |||||||||||||||||
Balance, September 30 |
$ | 8,043 | $ | 22,795 | $ | 12,828 | $ | 6,436 | $ | 1,992 | $ | 2,414 | $ | 54,508 | ||||||||||||||
As of September 30, 2011 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Construction/ | Commercial Real | Residential | Commercial | Consumer | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Land Development | Estate | Real Estate | & Industrial | & Other | Unallocated | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Allowance for loan losses: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Period end amount allocated to: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Loans individually evaluated for
impairment |
$ | 4,301 | $ | 17,174 | $ | 8,981 | $ | 3,510 | $ | 918 | $ | | $ | 34,884 | ||||||||||||||
Loans collectively evaluated for
impairment |
3,742 | 5,621 | 3,847 | 2,926 | 1,074 | 2,414 | 19,624 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Balance, September 30 |
$ | 8,043 | $ | 22,795 | $ | 12,828 | $ | 6,436 | $ | 1,992 | $ | 2,414 | $ | 54,508 | ||||||||||||||
Loans receivable: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Period end amount allocated to: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Loans individually evaluated for
impairment |
$ | 17,050 | $ | 84,746 | $ | 26,752 | $ | 10,175 | $ | 1,945 | $ | | $ | 140,668 | ||||||||||||||
Loans collectively evaluated for
impairment |
349,876 | 686,686 | 386,332 | 160,520 | 102,291 | | 1,685,705 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Balance, September 30 |
$ | 366,926 | $ | 771,432 | $ | 413,084 | $ | 170,695 | $ | 104,236 | $ | | $ | 1,826,373 | ||||||||||||||
As of September 30, 2011, no loans acquired with deteriorated credit quality have required a provision for loan loss. |
17
Table of Contents
The following tables present the balance in the allowance for loan losses for the year ended
December 31, 2010, and the recorded investment in allowance for loan losses and loans based on
portfolio segment by impairment method as of December 31, 2010. Allocation of a portion of the
allowance to one type of loans does not preclude its availability to absorb losses in other
categories.
As of December 31, 2010 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Construction/ | Commercial Real | Residential | Commercial | Consumer | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Land Development | Estate | Real Estate | & Industrial | & Other | Unallocated | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Allowance for loan losses: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Beginning balance |
$ | 9,624 | $ | 13,568 | $ | 11,348 | $ | 6,067 | $ | 1,984 | $ | 377 | $ | 42,968 | ||||||||||||||
Loans charged off |
(1,113 | ) | (858 | ) | (3,550 | ) | (3,315 | ) | (1,983 | ) | | (10,819 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Recoveries of loans previously
charged off |
55 | 851 | 416 | 39 | 424 | | 1,785 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Net loans recovered (charged off) |
(1,058 | ) | (7 | ) | (3,134 | ) | (3,276 | ) | (1,559 | ) | | (9,034 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Provision for loan losses |
2,343 | 424 | 5,666 | 902 | 807 | (292 | ) | 9,850 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Balance, September 30 |
10,909 | 13,985 | 13,880 | 3,693 | 1,232 | 85 | 43,784 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Loans charged off |
(9,161 | ) | (15,847 | ) | (7,181 | ) | (20,912 | ) | (533 | ) | | (53,634 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Recoveries of loans previously
charged off |
| 17 | 76 | 11 | 94 | | 198 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Net loans recovered (charged off) |
(9,161 | ) | (15,830 | ) | (7,105 | ) | (20,901 | ) | (439 | ) | | (53,436 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Provision for loan losses |
10,254 | 19,092 | 7,522 | 23,565 | 229 | 2,338 | 63,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Balance, end of year |
$ | 12,002 | $ | 17,247 | $ | 14,297 | $ | 6,357 | $ | 1,022 | $ | 2,423 | $ | 53,348 | ||||||||||||||
Period end amount allocated to: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Loans individually evaluated for
impairment |
$ | 7,602 | $ | 9,912 | $ | 9,843 | $ | 2,625 | $ | 438 | $ | | $ | 30,420 | ||||||||||||||
Loans collectively evaluated for
impairment |
4,400 | 7,335 | 4,454 | 3,732 | 584 | 2,423 | 22,928 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Balance, end of year |
$ | 12,002 | $ | 17,247 | $ | 14,297 | $ | 6,357 | $ | 1,022 | $ | 2,423 | $ | 53,348 | ||||||||||||||
Loans receivable: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Period end amount allocated to: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Loans individually evaluated for
impairment |
$ | 25,556 | $ | 69,010 | $ | 35,077 | $ | 16,939 | $ | 1,136 | $ | | $ | 147,718 | ||||||||||||||
Loans collectively evaluated for
impairment |
323,212 | 763,423 | 395,623 | 167,075 | 95,323 | | 1,744,656 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Balance, end of year |
$ | 348,768 | $ | 832,433 | $ | 430,700 | $ | 184,014 | $ | 96,459 | $ | | $ | 1,892,374 | ||||||||||||||
As of December 31, 2010, no loans acquired with deteriorated credit quality have required a provision for loan loss. |
18
Table of Contents
The following is an aging analysis for the non-covered loan portfolio as of September 30, 2011
and December 31, 2010:
September 30, 2011 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Accruing | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Loans | Loans | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Loans | Loans | Past Due | Past Due | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Past Due | Past Due | 90 Days | Total | Current | Total Loans | 90 Days | ||||||||||||||||||||||
30-59 Days | 60-89 Days | or More | Past Due | Loans | Receivable | or More | ||||||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Real estate: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial real estate loans |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Non-farm/non-residential |
$ | 5,491 | $ | 1,595 | $ | 5,028 | $ | 12,114 | $ | 732,635 | $ | 744,749 | $ | | ||||||||||||||
Construction/land development |
244 | 770 | 1,752 | 2,766 | 364,160 | 366,926 | 50 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Agricultural |
| | 939 | 939 | 25,744 | 26,683 | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Residential real estate loans |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Residential 1-4 family |
1,053 | 2,022 | 14,310 | 17,385 | 335,725 | 353,110 | 277 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Multifamily residential |
| | | | 59,974 | 59,974 | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Total real estate |
6,788 | 4,387 | 22,029 | 33,204 | 1,518,238 | 1,551,442 | 327 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Consumer |
702 | 218 | 1,928 | 2,848 | 37,377 | 40,225 | 105 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial and industrial |
57 | 138 | 1,808 | 2,003 | 168,692 | 170,695 | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Agricultural and other |
383 | 15 | 2,089 | 2,487 | 61,524 | 64,011 | 2,049 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 7,930 | $ | 4,758 | $ | 27,854 | $ | 40,542 | $ | 1,785,831 | $ | 1,826,373 | $ | 2,481 | ||||||||||||||
December 31, 2010 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Accruing | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Loans | Loans | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Loans | Loans | Past Due | Past Due | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Past Due | Past Due | 90 Days | Total | Current | Total Loans | 90 Days | ||||||||||||||||||||||
30-59 Days | 60-89 Days | or More | Past Due | Loans | Receivable | or More | ||||||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Real estate: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial real estate loans |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Non-farm/non-residential |
$ | 1,903 | $ | 4,833 | $ | 16,535 | $ | 23,271 | $ | 782,364 | $ | 805,635 | $ | | ||||||||||||||
Construction/land development |
5,055 | | 6,809 | 11,864 | 336,904 | 348,768 | 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Agricultural |
| | 220 | 220 | 26,578 | 26,798 | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Residential real estate loans |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Residential 1-4 family |
1,513 | 2,354 | 16,530 | 20,397 | 350,984 | 371,381 | 535 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Multifamily residential |
| 2,887 | 5,122 | 8,009 | 51,310 | 59,319 | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Total real estate |
8,471 | 10,074 | 45,216 | 63,761 | 1,548,140 | 1,611,901 | 536 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Consumer |
154 | 60 | 1,342 | 1,556 | 50,086 | 51,642 | 34 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial and industrial |
283 | 395 | 2,943 | 3,621 | 180,393 | 184,014 | 8 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Agricultural and other |
156 | 20 | 1 | 177 | 44,640 | 44,817 | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 9,064 | $ | 10,549 | $ | 49,502 | $ | 69,115 | $ | 1,823,259 | $ | 1,892,374 | $ | 578 | ||||||||||||||
Non-accruing loans not covered by loss share at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 were
$25.4 million and $48.9 million, respectively.
The Company did not sell any of the guaranteed portions of SBA loans during the three-month
month period ended September 30, 2011. During the nine-month period ended September 30, 2011, the
Company sold $4.2 million of the guaranteed portion of certain SBA loans, which resulted in a gain
of approximately $259,000. The Company did not sell any of the guaranteed portions of SBA loans
during the three-month month period ended September 30, 2010. The Company sold $250,000 of the
guaranteed portions of SBA loans during the nine-month period ended September 30, 2010, resulting
in a gain of $18,000.
19
Table of Contents
Mortgage loans held for sale of approximately $10.7 million and $14.0 million at September 30,
2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively, are included in residential 1-4 family loans. Mortgage
loans held for sale are carried at the lower of cost or fair value, determined using an aggregate
basis. Gains and losses resulting from sales of mortgage loans are recognized when the respective
loans are sold to investors. Gains and losses are determined by the difference between the selling
price and the carrying amount of the loans sold, net of discounts collected or paid. The Company
obtains forward commitments to sell mortgage loans to reduce market risk on mortgage loans in the
process of origination and mortgage loans held for sale. The forward commitments acquired by the
Company for mortgage loans in process of origination are not mandatory forward commitments. These
commitments are structured on a best efforts basis; therefore the Company is not required to
substitute another loan or to buy back the commitment if the original loan does not fund.
Typically, the Company delivers the mortgage loans within a few days after the loans are funded.
These commitments are derivative instruments and their fair values at September 30, 2011 and
December 31, 2010 were not material.
The following is a summary of the non-covered impaired loans as of September 30, 2011 and
December 31, 2010:
September 30, 2011 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Allocation | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Unpaid Contractual | Total Recorded | of Allowance for | Average Recorded | Interest | Average Recorded | Interest | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Principal Balance | Investment | Loan Losses | Investment | Recognized | Investment | Recognized | ||||||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Real estate: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial real estate loans |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Non-farm/non-residential |
$ | 64,143 | $ | 59,147 | $ | 16,775 | $ | 52,523 | $ | 802 | $ | 45,901 | $ | 1,974 | ||||||||||||||
Construction/land development |
21,117 | 20,942 | 4,301 | 19,669 | 276 | 18,945 | 787 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Agricultural |
598 | 598 | 399 | 598 | | 598 | 10 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Residential real estate loans |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Residential 1-4 family |
23,228 | 20,366 | 6,366 | 20,673 | 188 | 19,832 | 515 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Multifamily residential |
6,586 | 6,586 | 2,615 | 7,045 | 84 | 7,154 | 266 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Total real estate |
115,672 | 107,639 | 30,456 | 100,508 | 1,350 | 92,430 | 3,552 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Consumer |
1,178 | 1,178 | 918 | 1,622 | 8 | 1,286 | 34 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial and industrial |
11,324 | 9,573 | 3,510 | 11,109 | 140 | 11,575 | 528 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Agricultural and other |
| | | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 128,174 | $ | 118,390 | $ | 34,884 | $ | 113,239 | $ | 1,498 | $ | 105,291 | $ | 4,114 | ||||||||||||||
December 31, 2010 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Allocation | ||||||||||||||||||||
Unpaid Contractual | Total Recorded | of Allowance for | Average Recorded | Interest | ||||||||||||||||
Principal Balance | Investment | Loan Losses | Investment | Recognized | ||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Real estate: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial real estate loans |
||||||||||||||||||||
Non-farm/non-residential |
$ | 40,078 | $ | 36,884 | $ | 9,697 | $ | 18,366 | $ | 1,922 | ||||||||||
Construction/land development |
19,617 | 17,282 | 7,602 | 14,272 | 823 | |||||||||||||||
Agricultural |
598 | 598 | 215 | 120 | 40 | |||||||||||||||
Residential real estate loans |
||||||||||||||||||||
Residential 1-4 family |
20,894 | 18,416 | 6,884 | 17,137 | 602 | |||||||||||||||
Multifamily residential |
7,251 | 7,251 | 2,959 | 5,149 | 325 | |||||||||||||||
Total real estate |
88,438 | 80,431 | 27,357 | 55,044 | 3,712 | |||||||||||||||
Consumer |
658 | 658 | 438 | 799 | | |||||||||||||||
Commercial and industrial |
11,284 | 11,208 | 2,625 | 6,218 | 749 | |||||||||||||||
Agricultural and other |
| | | | | |||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 100,380 | $ | 92,297 | $ | 30,420 | $ | 62,061 | $ | 4,461 | ||||||||||
20
Table of Contents
All of the Companys non-covered impaired loans have a specific allocation of the allowance
for loan losses, with the exception of certain TDRs where the discounted cash flows under the
restructuring are greater than or equal to those under the original terms of the loan. Interest
recognized on non-covered impaired loans during the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010
was approximately $4.1 million and $1.9 million, respectively. The amount of interest recognized
on non-covered impaired loans on the cash basis is not materially different than the accrual basis.
Credit Quality Indicators. As part of the on-going monitoring of the credit quality of the
Companys loan portfolio, management tracks certain credit quality indicators including trends
related to (i) the risk rating of loans, (ii) the level of classified loans, (iii) net charge-offs,
(iv) non-performing loans and (v) the general economic conditions in Florida and Arkansas.
The Company utilizes a risk rating matrix to assign a risk rating to each of its loans. Loans
are rated on a scale from 1 to 8. A description of the general characteristics of the 8 risk
ratings are as follows:
| Risk rating 1 Excellent. Loans in this category are to persons or entities of unquestionable financial strength, a highly liquid financial position, with collateral that is liquid and well margined. These borrowers have performed without question on past obligations, and the Bank expects their performance to continue. Internally generated cash flow covers current maturities of long-term debt by a substantial margin. Loans secured by bank certificates of deposit and savings accounts, with appropriate holds placed on the accounts, are to be rated in this category. | ||
| Risk rating 2 Good. These are loans to persons or entities with strong financial condition and above-average liquidity that have previously satisfactorily handled their obligations with the Bank. Collateral securing the Banks debt is margined in accordance with policy guidelines. Internally generated cash flow covers current maturities of long-term debt more than adequately. Unsecured loans to individuals supported by strong financial statements and on which repayment is satisfactory may be included in this classification. | ||
| Risk rating 3 Satisfactory. Loans to persons or entities with an average financial condition, adequate collateral margins, adequate cash flow to service long-term debt, and net worth comprised mainly of fixed assets are included in this category. These entities are minimally profitable now, with projections indicating continued profitability into the foreseeable future. Closely held corporations or businesses where a majority of the profits are withdrawn by the owners or paid in dividends are included in this rating category. Overall, these loans are basically sound. | ||
| Risk rating 4 Watch. Borrowers who have marginal cash flow, marginal profitability or have experienced an unprofitable year and a declining financial condition characterize these loans. The borrower has in the past satisfactorily handled debts with the Bank, but in recent months has either been late, delinquent in making payments, or made sporadic payments. While the Bank continues to be adequately secured, margins have decreased or are decreasing, despite the borrowers continued satisfactory condition. Other characteristics of borrowers in this class include inadequate credit information, weakness of financial statement and repayment capacity, but with collateral that appears to limit exposure. Included in this category are loans to borrowers in industries that are experiencing elevated risk. | ||
| Risk rating 5 Other Loans Especially Mentioned (OLEM). A loan criticized as OLEM has potential weaknesses that deserve managements close attention. If left uncorrected, these potential weaknesses may result in deterioration of the repayment prospects for the asset or in the institutions credit position at some future date. OLEM assets are not adversely classified and do not expose the institution to sufficient risk to warrant adverse classification. | ||
| Risk rating 6 Substandard. A loan classified as substandard is inadequately protected by the sound worth and paying capacity of the borrower or the collateral pledged. Loss potential, while existing in the aggregate amount of substandard loans, does not have to exist in individual assets. |
21
Table of Contents
| Risk rating 7 Doubtful. A loan classified as doubtful has all the weaknesses inherent in a loan classified as substandard with the added characteristic that the weaknesses make collection or liquidation in full, on the basis of currently existing facts, conditions, and values, highly questionable and improbable. These are poor quality loans in which neither the collateral, if any, nor the financial condition of the borrower presently ensure collectability in full in a reasonable period of time; in fact, there is permanent impairment in the collateral securing the loan. | ||
| Risk rating 8 Loss. Assets classified as loss are considered uncollectible and of such little value that the continuance as bankable assets is not warranted. This classification does not mean that the asset has absolutely no recovery or salvage value, but rather, it is not practical or desirable to defer writing off this basically worthless asset, even though partial recovery may occur in the future. This classification is based upon current facts, not probabilities. Assets classified as loss should be charged-off in the period in which they became uncollectible. |
The Companys classified loans include loans in risk ratings 6, 7 and 8. The following is a
presentation of classified non-covered loans by class as of September 30, 2011 and December 31,
2010:
September 30, 2011 | ||||||||||||||||
Risk Rated 6 | Risk Rated 7 | Risk Rated 8 | Classified Total | |||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Real estate: |
||||||||||||||||
Commercial real estate loans |
||||||||||||||||
Non-farm/non-residential |
$ | 40,526 | $ | 5 | $ | | $ | 40,531 | ||||||||
Construction/land development |
3,138 | | | 3,138 | ||||||||||||
Agricultural |
939 | | | 939 | ||||||||||||
Residential real estate loans |
||||||||||||||||
Residential 1-4 family |
22,366 | 189 | | 22,555 | ||||||||||||
Multifamily residential |
5,139 | | | 5,139 | ||||||||||||
Total real estate |
72,108 | 194 | | 72,302 | ||||||||||||
Consumer |
2,198 | | | 2,198 | ||||||||||||
Commercial and industrial |
9,771 | 46 | | 9,817 | ||||||||||||
Agricultural and other |
90 | | | 90 | ||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 84,167 | $ | 240 | $ | | $ | 84,407 | ||||||||
December 31, 2010 | ||||||||||||||||
Risk Rated 6 | Risk Rated 7 | Risk Rated 8 | Total | |||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Real estate: |
||||||||||||||||
Commercial real estate loans |
||||||||||||||||
Non-farm/non-residential |
$ | 31,806 | $ | 5,483 | $ | | $ | 37,289 | ||||||||
Construction/land development |
11,665 | 934 | | 12,599 | ||||||||||||
Agricultural |
994 | | | 994 | ||||||||||||
Residential real estate loans |
||||||||||||||||
Residential 1-4 family |
23,801 | 740 | | 24,541 | ||||||||||||
Multifamily residential |
11,170 | | | 11,170 | ||||||||||||
Total real estate |
79,436 | 7,157 | | 86,593 | ||||||||||||
Consumer |
1,350 | | | 1,350 | ||||||||||||
Commercial and industrial |
3,588 | 55 | | 3,643 | ||||||||||||
Agricultural |
1 | 2 | | 3 | ||||||||||||
Other |
143 | | | 143 | ||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 84,518 | $ | 7,214 | $ | | $ | 91,732 | ||||||||
22
Table of Contents
Loans may be classified, but not considered impaired, due to one of the following reasons: (1)
The Company has established minimum dollar amount thresholds for loan impairment testing. All loans
over $250,000 that are rated 5 or worse are individually assessed for impairment on a quarterly
basis. Loans rated 6 8 that fall under the threshold amount are not individually tested for
impairment and therefore are not included in impaired loans; (2) of the loans that are above the
threshold amount and tested for impairment, after testing, some are considered to not be impaired
and are not included in impaired loans.
The following is a presentation of non-covered loans by class and risk rating as of September
30, 2011 and December 31, 2010:
September 30, 2011 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Risk | Risk | Risk | Risk | Risk | Classified | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Rated 1 | Rated 2 | Rated 3 | Rated 4 | Rated 5 | Total | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Real estate: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial real estate loans |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Non-farm/non-residential |
$ | 49 | $ | 16 | $ | 367,805 | $ | 288,728 | $ | 47,620 | $ | 40,531 | $ | 744,749 | ||||||||||||||
Construction/land development |
55 | | 94,229 | 252,787 | 16,717 | 3,138 | 366,926 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Agricultural |
| | 6,450 | 19,294 | | 939 | 26,683 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Residential real estate loans |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Residential 1-4 family |
282 | 101 | 214,556 | 106,951 | 8,665 | 22,555 | 353,110 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Multifamily residential |
| | 38,074 | 15,068 | 1,693 | 5,139 | 59,974 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Total real estate |
386 | 117 | 721,114 | 682,828 | 74,695 | 72,302 | 1,551,442 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Consumer |
9,579 | 905 | 17,470 | 8,508 | 1,565 | 2,198 | 40,225 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial and industrial |
7,066 | 1,101 | 72,975 | 77,119 | 2,617 | 9,817 | 170,695 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Agricultural and other |
73 | 1,504 | 28,924 | 33,098 | 322 | 90 | 64,011 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 17,104 | $ | 3,627 | $ | 840,483 | $ | 801,553 | $ | 79,199 | $ | 84,407 | $ | 1,826,373 | ||||||||||||||
December 31, 2010 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Risk | Risk | Risk | Risk | Risk | Classified | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rated 1 | Rated 2 | Rated 3 | Rated 4 | Rated 5 | Total | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | - | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Real estate: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial real estate loans |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Non-farm/non-residential |
$ | 398 | $ | 22 | $ | 440,990 | $ | 292,391 | $ | 34,545 | $ | 37,289 | $ | 805,635 | |||||||||||||||||
Construction/land development |
16 | | 74,887 | 244,133 | 17,133 | 12,599 | 348,768 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Agricultural |
| | 19,315 | 6,196 | 293 | 994 | 26,798 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Residential real estate loans |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Residential 1-4 family |
245 | 12 | 242,036 | 92,998 | 11,549 | 24,541 | 371,381 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Multifamily residential |
| | 28,539 | 17,915 | 1,695 | 11,170 | 59,319 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total real estate |
659 | 34 | 805,767 | 653,633 | 65,215 | 86,593 | 1,611,901 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Consumer |
14,355 | 3,093 | 15,232 | 17,360 | 252 | 1,350 | 51,642 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial and industrial |
7,967 | 668 | 81,012 | 75,138 | 15,586 | 3,643 | 184,014 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Agricultural and other |
144 | 1,270 | 36,029 | 7,223 | 5 | 146 | 44,817 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 23,125 | $ | 5,065 | $ | 938,040 | $ | 753,354 | $ | 81,058 | $ | 91,732 | $ | 1,892,374 | |||||||||||||||||
23
Table of Contents
The following is a presentation of non-covered TDRs by class as of September 30, 2011:
September 30, 2011 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rate | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Number | Pre-Modification | Rate | Term | & Term | Post-Modification | |||||||||||||||||||
of Loans | Outstanding Balance | Modification | Modification | Modification | Outstanding Balance | |||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Real estate: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial real estate loans |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Non-farm/non-residential |
27 | $ | 40,225 | $ | 24,481 | $ | 5,398 | $ | 5,760 | $ | 35,639 | |||||||||||||
Construction/land development |
7 | 11,737 | 7,659 | 34 | 3,702 | 11,395 | ||||||||||||||||||
Agricultural |
1 | 598 | 598 | | | 598 | ||||||||||||||||||
Residential real estate loans |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Residential 1-4 family |
15 | 10,740 | 3,859 | 125 | 771 | 4,755 | ||||||||||||||||||
Multifamily residential |
2 | 4,586 | 3,693 | | | 3,693 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total real estate |
52 | 67,886 | 40,290 | 5,557 | 10,233 | 56,080 | ||||||||||||||||||
Commercial and industrial |
4 | 517 | 115 | | 178 | 293 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total |
56 | $ | 68,403 | $ | 40,405 | $ | 5,557 | $ | 10,411 | $ | 56,373 | |||||||||||||
The following is a presentation of non-covered TDRs on non-accrual status because they are
not in compliance with the modified terms:
September 30, 2011 | ||||||||
Number of Loans | Recorded Balance | |||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Real estate: |
||||||||
Commercial real estate loans |
||||||||
Non-farm/non-residential |
2 | $ | 1,642 | |||||
Construction/land development |
1 | 113 | ||||||
Agricultural |
1 | 598 | ||||||
Residential real estate loans |
||||||||
Residential 1-4 family |
6 | 2,602 | ||||||
Multifamily residential |
| | ||||||
Total real estate |
10 | 4,955 | ||||||
Commercial and industrial |
1 | 10 | ||||||
Total |
11 | $ | 4,965 | |||||
24
Table of Contents
5: Loans Receivable Covered by FDIC Loss Share
The Company evaluated loans purchased in conjunction with the acquisitions of Old Southern,
Key West, Coastal-Bayside, Wakulla and Gulf State described in Note 2, Business Combinations, for
impairment in accordance with the provisions of FASB ASC Topic 310-30, Loans and Debt Securities
Acquired with Deteriorated Credit Quality. Purchased covered loans are considered impaired if there
is evidence of credit deterioration since origination and if it is probable that not all
contractually required payments will be collected. The following table reflects the carrying value
of all purchased covered impaired loans as of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 for the
Companys FDIC-assisted transactions:
September 30, | December 31, | |||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Real estate: |
||||||||
Commercial real estate loans |
||||||||
Non-farm/non-residential |
$ | 189,558 | $ | 208,678 | ||||
Construction/land development |
117,143 | 127,340 | ||||||
Agricultural |
3,413 | 5,454 | ||||||
Residential real estate loans |
||||||||
Residential 1-4 family |
158,701 | 180,914 | ||||||
Multifamily residential |
9,010 | 9,176 | ||||||
Total real estate |
477,825 | 531,562 | ||||||
Consumer |
454 | 498 | ||||||
Commercial and industrial |
32,183 | 42,443 | ||||||
Agricultural |
| 63 | ||||||
Other |
864 | 1,210 | ||||||
Loans receivable covered by FDIC loss share (1) |
$ | 511,326 | $ | 575,776 | ||||
(1) | These loans were not classified as nonperforming assets at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, as the loans are accounted for on a pooled basis and the pools are considered to be performing. Therefore, interest income, through accretion of the difference between the carrying amount of the loans and the expected cash flows, is being recognized on all purchased impaired loans. |
25
Table of Contents
The acquired loans were grouped into pools based on common risk characteristics and were
recorded at their estimated fair values, which incorporated estimated credit losses at the
acquisition dates. These loan pools are systematically reviewed by the Company to determine
material changes in cash flow estimates from those identified at the time of the acquisition.
Techniques used in determining risk of loss are similar to the Centennial Bank non-covered loan
portfolio, with most focus being placed on those loan pools which include the larger loan
relationships and those loan pools which exhibit higher risk characteristics.
Changes in the carrying amount of the accretable yield for purchased impaired and non-impaired
loans were as follows for the period ended September 30, 2011 for the Companys FDIC-assisted
acquisitions.
Carrying Amount of | ||||||||
Accretable Yield | Loans | |||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Balance at beginning of period |
$ | 86,712 | $ | 575,776 | ||||
Reforecasted future interest payments for loan pools |
50,129 | | ||||||
Adjustments to yield |
2,942 | | ||||||
Income accreted |
(29,106 | ) | 29,106 | |||||
Payments received, gross |
| (93,556 | ) | |||||
Balance at end of period |
$ | 110,677 | $ | 511,326 | ||||
The loan pools were evaluated by the Company and are currently forecasted to have a slower
run-off than originally expected. As a result, the Company has reforecast the total accretable
yield expectations for those loan pools by $50.1 million. This updated forecast does not change
the expected weighted average yields on the loan pools.
Three pools evaluated by the Company were determined to have a materially projected credit
improvement. As a result of this improvement, the Company will recognize approximately $2.9
million as an adjustment to yield over the life of the loans. Improvements in credit quality
decrease the basis in the related indemnification assets. This positive event will reduce the
indemnification asset by approximately $2.2 million. This $2.2 million will be amortized
symmetrically offsetting the $2.9 million. This will result in approximately $730,000 of pre-tax
net income being recognized going forward.
No pools evaluated by the Company were determined to have experienced impairment in the
estimated credit quality or cash flows. There were no allowances for loan losses related to the
purchased impaired loans at September 30, 2011.
6: Deposits
The aggregate amount of time deposits with a minimum denomination of $100,000 was $739.1
million and $845.2 million at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively. Interest
expense applicable to certificates in excess of $100,000 totaled $2.9 million and $2.4 million for
the three months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010. Interest expense applicable to certificates in
excess of $100,000 totaled $9.3 million and $7.9 million for the nine months ended September 30,
2011 and 2010, respectively. As of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, brokered deposits were
$112.9 million and $98.9 million, respectively.
Deposits totaling approximately $246.0 million and $267.6 million at September 30, 2011 and
December 31, 2010, respectively, were public funds obtained primarily from state and political
subdivisions in the United States.
26
Table of Contents
7: Securities Sold Under Agreements to Repurchase
At September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, securities sold under agreements to repurchase
totaled $62.4 million and $74.5 million, respectively. For the three month periods ended September
30, 2011 and September 30, 2010, securities sold under agreements to repurchase daily weighted
average totaled $66.6 million and $68.6 million, respectively. For the nine month periods ended
September 30, 2011 and September 30, 2010, securities sold under agreements to repurchase daily
weighted average totaled $68.6 million and $61.4 million, respectively.
8: FHLB Borrowed Funds
The Companys FHLB borrowed funds were $142.9 million and $177.3 million at September 30, 2011
and December 31, 2010, respectively. All of the outstanding balance at September 30, 2011 and
December 31, 2010 were long-term advances. The FHLB advances mature from the current year to 2025
with fixed interest rates ranging from 2.020% to 4.898% and are secured by loans and investments
securities. Expected maturities will differ from contractual maturities, because FHLB may have the
right to call or prepay certain obligations.
Additionally, the Company had $135.0 million and $179.1 million at September 30, 2011 and
December 31, 2010, respectively, in letters of credit under a FHLB blanket borrowing line of
credit, which are used to collateralize public deposits at September 30, 2011 and December 31,
2010, respectively.
9: Income Taxes
The following is a summary of the components of the provision (benefit) for income taxes for
the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30:
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Current: |
||||||||||||||||
Federal |
$ | 5,171 | $ | 4,262 | $ | 25,900 | $ | 11,449 | ||||||||
State |
1,331 | 1,196 | 4,778 | 2,573 | ||||||||||||
Total current |
6,502 | 5,458 | 30,678 | 14,022 | ||||||||||||
Deferred: |
||||||||||||||||
Federal |
1,310 | (373 | ) | (7,531 | ) | 2,087 | ||||||||||
State |
(188 | ) | (479 | ) | (1,359 | ) | 13 | |||||||||
Total deferred |
1,122 | (852 | ) | (8,890 | ) | 2,100 | ||||||||||
Provision for income taxes |
$ | 7,624 | $ | 4,606 | $ | 21,788 | $ | 16,122 | ||||||||
The reconciliation between the statutory federal income tax rate and effective income tax rate
is as follows for the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30:
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||
Statutory federal income tax rate |
35.00 | % | 35.00 | % | 35.00 | % | 35.00 | % | ||||||||
Effect of nontaxable interest income |
(2.75 | ) | (4.14 | ) | (2.90 | ) | (3.65 | ) | ||||||||
Cash value of life insurance |
(0.52 | ) | (0.82 | ) | (0.48 | ) | (0.81 | ) | ||||||||
State income taxes, net of federal benefit |
3.39 | 2.56 | 3.56 | 3.54 | ||||||||||||
Other |
(0.36 | ) | (0.08 | ) | (0.24 | ) | (0.15 | ) | ||||||||
Effective income tax rate |
34.76 | % | 32.52 | % | 34.94 | % | 33.93 | % | ||||||||
27
Table of Contents
The types of temporary differences between the tax basis of assets and liabilities and their
financial reporting amounts that give rise to deferred income tax assets and liabilities, and their
approximate tax effects, are as follows:
September 30, 2011 | December 31, 2010 | |||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Deferred tax assets: |
||||||||
Allowance for loan losses |
$ | 21,407 | $ | 20,879 | ||||
Deferred compensation |
1,042 | 1,742 | ||||||
Stock options |
331 | 324 | ||||||
Real estate owned |
5,430 | 7,041 | ||||||
Loan discounts |
61,904 | 62,269 | ||||||
Tax basis premium/discount on acquisitions |
14,463 | 14,682 | ||||||
Deposits |
464 | 1,163 | ||||||
Other |
7,253 | 6,206 | ||||||
Gross deferred tax assets |
112,294 | 114,306 | ||||||
Deferred tax liabilities: |
||||||||
Accelerated depreciation on premises and
equipment |
2,255 | 2,341 | ||||||
Unrealized gain on securities |
5,672 | 194 | ||||||
Core deposit intangibles |
1,394 | 2,101 | ||||||
Indemnification asset |
78,925 | 89,142 | ||||||
FHLB dividends |
876 | 867 | ||||||
Other |
1,174 | 1,075 | ||||||
Gross deferred tax liabilities |
90,296 | 95,720 | ||||||
Net deferred tax assets |
$ | 21,998 | $ | 18,586 | ||||
10: Common Stock and Compensation Plans
During the first quarter of 2011, the Company granted 24,156 shares of restricted common
stock. The restricted shares will vest equally each year over three years beginning on the first
anniversary of the grant. Of the 24,156 shares of restricted stock granted, 19,906 shares are also
limited by the 2009 agreement between the Company and the United States Department of Treasury (the
Treasury). This Treasury agreement has additional provisions concerning the transferability of the
shares and the continuation of performing substantial services for the Company. As a result of the
Company repurchasing all 50,000 shares of its Series A Preferred Stock in July 2011 which the
Company issued to the Treasury this limitation has been removed. The amount of annual pre-tax
expense during 2011 through 2013 associated with the issuance of this restricted stock will be
approximately $172,000 per year.
During the third quarter of 2011, the Company utilized a small portion of its previously
approved stock repurchase program. This program authorized the repurchase of 1,188,000 shares of
the Companys common stock. For the period beginning August 8, 2011 and ending September 30, 2011,
the Company repurchased a total of 250,000 shares with a weighted average stock price of $22.15.
The repurchased shares will be used to fulfill a proposed future restricted stock award program for
the Companys management team. The third quarter earnings were used to fund this repurchase.
28
Table of Contents
11: Non-Interest Expense
The table below shows the components of non-interest expense for the three and nine months
ended September 30, 2011 and 2010:
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Salaries and employee benefits |
$ | 10,691 | $ | 9,637 | $ | 32,449 | $ | 27,251 | ||||||||
Occupancy and equipment |
3,562 | 3,264 | 10,923 | 9,036 | ||||||||||||
Data processing expense |
1,185 | 848 | 3,607 | 2,664 | ||||||||||||
Other operating expenses: |
||||||||||||||||
Advertising |
1,033 | 532 | 3,046 | 1,351 | ||||||||||||
Merger expenses |
| 1,653 | 11 | 2,970 | ||||||||||||
Amortization of intangibles |
705 | 674 | 2,122 | 1,736 | ||||||||||||
Amortization of mortgage servicing rights |
| | | 436 | ||||||||||||
Electronic banking expense |
682 | 495 | 2,038 | 1,468 | ||||||||||||
Directors fees |
230 | 176 | 594 | 502 | ||||||||||||
Due from bank service charges |
119 | 142 | 378 | 335 | ||||||||||||
FDIC and state assessment |
1,062 | 908 | 3,213 | 2,792 | ||||||||||||
Insurance |
447 | 309 | 1,226 | 905 | ||||||||||||
Legal and accounting |
367 | 426 | 1,276 | 1,170 | ||||||||||||
Mortgage servicing expense |
| 4 | | 164 | ||||||||||||
Other professional fees |
522 | 385 | 1,504 | 1,066 | ||||||||||||
Operating supplies |
260 | 226 | 871 | 619 | ||||||||||||
Postage |
243 | 167 | 730 | 481 | ||||||||||||
Telephone |
234 | 240 | 756 | 530 | ||||||||||||
Other expense |
2,394 | 1,208 | 6,709 | 3,363 | ||||||||||||
Total other operating expenses |
8,298 | 7,545 | 24,474 | 19,888 | ||||||||||||
Total non-interest expense |
$ | 23,736 | $ | 21,294 | $ | 71,453 | $ | 58,839 | ||||||||
12: Concentration of Credit Risks
The Companys primary market areas are in central Arkansas, north central Arkansas, southern
Arkansas, central Florida, southwestern Florida, the Florida Panhandle and the Florida Keys. The
Company primarily grants loans to customers located within these geographical areas unless the
borrower has an established relationship with the Company.
The diversity of the Companys economic base tends to provide a stable lending environment.
Although the Company has a loan portfolio that is diversified in both industry and geographic area,
a substantial portion of its debtors ability to honor their contracts is dependent upon real
estate values, tourism demand and the economic conditions prevailing in its market areas.
29
Table of Contents
13: Significant Estimates and Concentrations
Accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America require disclosure of
certain significant estimates and current vulnerabilities due to certain concentrations. Estimates
related to the allowance for loan losses and certain concentrations of credit risk are reflected in
Note 4, while deposit concentrations are reflected in Note 6.
Although the Company has a diversified loan portfolio, at September 30, 2011 and December 31,
2010, non-covered commercial real estate loans represented 62.3% and 62.4% of gross non-covered
loans and 245.8% and 247.7% of total stockholders equity, respectively. Non-covered residential
real estate loans represented 22.6% and 22.8% of gross non-covered loans and 89.2% and 90.3% of
total stockholders equity at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively.
The current economic environment presents financial institutions with unprecedented
circumstances and challenges which in some cases have resulted in large declines in the fair values
of investments and other assets, constraints on liquidity and significant credit quality problems,
including severe volatility in the valuation of real estate and other collateral supporting loans.
The financial statements have been prepared using values and information currently available to the
Company.
Given the volatility of current economic conditions, the values of assets and liabilities
recorded in the financial statements could change rapidly, resulting in material future adjustments
in asset values, the allowance for loan losses and capital that could negatively impact the
Companys ability to meet regulatory capital requirements and maintain sufficient liquidity.
14: Commitments and Contingencies
In the ordinary course of business, the Company makes various commitments and incurs certain
contingent liabilities to fulfill the financing needs of their customers. These commitments and
contingent liabilities include lines of credit and commitments to extend credit and issue standby
letters of credit. The Company applies the same credit policies and standards as they do in the
lending process when making these commitments. The collateral obtained is based on the assessed
creditworthiness of the borrower.
At September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, commitments to extend credit of $266.2 million
and $257.9 million, respectively, were outstanding. A percentage of these balances are participated
out to other banks; therefore, the Company can call on the participating banks to fund future
draws. Since some of these commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon, the total
commitment amount does not necessarily represent future cash requirements.
Outstanding standby letters of credit are contingent commitments issued by the Company,
generally to guarantee the performance of a customer in third-party borrowing arrangements. The
term of the guarantee is dependent upon the credit worthiness of the borrower some of which are
long-term. The amount of collateral obtained, if deemed necessary, is based on managements credit
evaluation of the counterparty. Collateral held varies but may include accounts receivable,
inventory, property, plant and equipment, commercial real estate and residential real estate.
Management uses the same credit policies in granting lines of credit as it does for
on-balance-sheet instruments. The maximum amount of future payments the Company could be required
to make under these guarantees at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, is $23.2 million and
$18.7 million, respectively.
The Company and/or its subsidiary bank have various unrelated legal proceedings, most of which
involve loan foreclosure activity pending, which, in the aggregate, are not expected to have a
material adverse effect on the financial position and results of operations of the Company.
30
Table of Contents
15: Regulatory Matters
The Bank is subject to a legal limitation on dividends that can be paid to the parent company
without prior approval of the applicable regulatory agencies. Arkansas bank regulators have
specified that the maximum dividend limit state banks may pay to the parent company without prior
approval is 75% of the current year earnings plus 75% of the retained net earnings of the preceding
year. Since the Bank is also under supervision of the Federal Reserve, it is further limited if the
total of all dividends declared in any calendar year by the Bank exceeds the Banks net profits to
date for that year combined with its retained net profits for the preceding two years. During 2010
and the first six months of 2011, the Company did not request any dividends from its banking
subsidiary. As a result of the Company repurchasing all 50,000 shares of its Series A Preferred
Stock and the related common stock warrant in July 2011 for approximately $51.7 million, the
Company requested approximately $28.4 million during the third quarter of 2011 in dividends from
its banking subsidiary. This dividend is equal to approximately 75% of the current year earnings
through August 31, 2011 from its banking subsidiary.
The Federal Reserve Boards risk-based capital guidelines include the definitions for (1) a
well-capitalized institution, (2) an adequately-capitalized institution, and (3) and
undercapitalized institution. The criteria for a well-capitalized institution are: a 5% Tier 1
leverage capital ratio, a 6% Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio, and a 10% total risk-based
capital ratio. As of September 30, 2011, the Bank met the capital standards for a
well-capitalized institution. The Companys Tier 1 leverage capital ratio, Tier 1 risk-based
capital ratio, and total risk-based capital ratio were 12.07%, 16.21%, and 17.47%, respectively,
as of September 30, 2011.
16: Additional Cash Flow Information
The following is summary of the Companys additional cash flow information during the
three-month and nine-month periods ended:
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Interest paid |
$ | 7,784 | $ | 9,281 | $ | 24,396 | $ | 17,728 | ||||||||
Income taxes paid |
13,650 | 1,700 | 29,000 | 9,050 | ||||||||||||
Assets acquired by foreclosure |
15,959 | 1,797 | 41,206 | 8,670 |
17: Financial Instruments
FASB ASC 820 Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures defines fair value as the price that
would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction
between market participants at the measurement date. FASB ASC 820 also establishes a fair value
hierarchy which requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of
unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. The standard describes three levels of inputs that
may be used to measure fair value:
Level 1 | Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities | ||
Level 2 | Observable inputs other than Level 1 prices, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities | ||
Level 3 | Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities |
31
Table of Contents
Available-for-sale securities are the only material instruments valued on a recurring basis
which are held by the Company at fair value. The Company does not have any Level 1 securities.
Primarily all of the Companys securities are considered to be Level 2 securities. These Level 2
securities consist of U.S. government-sponsored enterprises, mortgage-backed securities plus state
and political subdivisions. As of September 30, 2011, Level 3 securities were immaterial.
Impaired loans that are collateral dependent are the only material financial assets valued on
a non-recurring basis which are held by the Company at fair value. Loan impairment is reported when
full payment under the loan terms is not expected. Impaired loans are carried at the net
realizable value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent. A portion of the allowance
for loan losses is allocated to impaired loans if the value of such loans is deemed to be less than
the unpaid balance. If these allocations cause the allowance for loan losses to require increase,
such increase is reported as a component of the provision for loan losses. Loan losses are charged
against the allowance when management believes the uncollectability of a loan is probable.
Non-covered impaired loans, net of specific allowance, were $83.5 million and $61.9 million as of
September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively. This valuation is considered Level 3,
consisting of appraisals of underlying collateral. The Company reversed approximately $200,000 of
accrued interest receivable when non-covered impaired loans were put on non-accrual status during
the nine months ended September 30, 2011.
Foreclosed assets held for sale are the only material non-financial assets valued on a
non-recurring basis which are held by the Company at fair value, less estimated costs to sell. At
foreclosure, if the fair value, less estimated costs to sell, of the real estate acquired is less
than the Companys recorded investment in the related loan, a write-down is recognized through a
charge to the allowance for loan losses. Additionally, valuations are periodically performed by
management and any subsequent reduction in value is recognized by a charge to income. The fair
value of foreclosed assets held for sale is estimated using Level 3 inputs based on appraisals of
underlying collateral. As of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the fair value of
foreclosed assets held for sale not covered by loss share, less estimated costs to sell was $16.5
million and $11.6 million, respectively.
Fair Values of Financial Instruments
The following methods and assumptions were used by the Company in estimating fair values of
financial instruments as disclosed in these notes:
Cash and cash equivalents and federal funds sold For these short-term instruments, the
carrying amount is a reasonable estimate of fair value.
Loans receivable not covered by loss share, net of non-covered impaired loans and allowance
For variable-rate loans that reprice frequently and with no significant change in credit risk, fair
values are assumed to approximate the carrying amounts. The fair values for fixed-rate loans are
estimated using discounted cash flow analysis, based on interest rates currently being offered for
loans with similar terms to borrowers of similar credit quality. Loan fair value estimates include
judgments regarding future expected loss experience and risk characteristics.
Loans receivable covered by FDIC loss share Fair values for loans are based on a discounted
cash flow methodology that considered factors including the type of loan and related collateral,
classification status, fixed or variable interest rate, term of loan and whether or not the loan
was amortizing, and current discount rates. Loans were grouped together according to similar
characteristics and were treated in the aggregate when applying various valuation techniques. The
discount rates used for loans are based on current market rates for new originations of comparable
loans and include adjustments for liquidity concerns. The discount rate does not include a factor
for credit losses as that has been included in the estimated cash flows.
32
Table of Contents
FDIC indemnification asset Although this asset is a contractual receivable from the FDIC,
there is no effective interest rate. The Bank will collect this asset over the next several years.
The amount ultimately collected will depend on the timing and amount of collections and charge-offs
on the acquired assets covered by the loss sharing agreement. While this asset was recorded at its
estimated fair value at acquisition date, it is not practicable to complete a fair value analysis
on a quarterly or annual basis. This would involve preparing a fair value analysis of the entire
portfolio of loans and foreclosed assets covered by the loss sharing agreement on a quarterly or
annual basis in order to estimate the fair value of the FDIC indemnification asset.
Accrued interest receivable The carrying amount of accrued interest receivable approximates
its fair value.
Deposits and securities sold under agreements to repurchase The fair values of demand,
savings deposits and securities sold under agreements to repurchase are, by definition, equal to
the amount payable on demand and therefore approximate their carrying amounts. The fair values for
time deposits are estimated using a discounted cash flow calculation that utilizes interest rates
currently being offered on time deposits with similar contractual maturities.
FHLB and other borrowed funds For short-term instruments, the carrying amount is a
reasonable estimate of fair value. The fair value of long-term debt is estimated based on the
current rates available to the Company for debt with similar terms and remaining maturities.
Accrued interest payable The carrying amount of accrued interest payable approximates its
fair value.
Subordinated debentures The fair value of subordinated debentures is estimated using the
rates that would be charged for subordinated debentures of similar remaining maturities.
Commitments to extend credit, letters of credit and lines of credit The fair value of
commitments is estimated using the fees currently charged to enter into similar agreements, taking
into account the remaining terms of the agreements and the present creditworthiness of the
counterparties. For fixed rate loan commitments, fair value also considers the difference between
current levels of interest rates and the committed rates. The fair values of letters of credit and
lines of credit are based on fees currently charged for similar agreements or on the estimated cost
to terminate or otherwise settle the obligations with the counterparties at the reporting date.
The following table presents the estimated fair values of the Companys financial instruments.
The fair values of certain of these instruments were calculated by discounting expected cash flows,
which involves significant judgments by management and uncertainties. Fair value is the estimated
amount at which financial assets or liabilities could be exchanged in a current transaction between
willing parties other than in a forced or liquidation sale. Because no market exists for certain of
these financial instruments and because management does not intend to sell these financial
instruments, the Company does not know whether the fair values shown below represent values at
which the respective financial instruments could be sold individually or in the aggregate.
33
Table of Contents
September 30, 2011 | ||||||||
Carrying | ||||||||
Amount | Fair Value | |||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Financial assets: |
||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 152,801 | $ | 152,801 | ||||
Federal funds sold |
3,670 | 3,670 | ||||||
Loans receivable not covered by loss share, net of non-covered
impaired loans and allowance |
1,688,359 | 1,673,488 | ||||||
Loans receivable covered by FDIC loss share |
511,326 | 511,326 | ||||||
FDIC indemnification asset |
201,211 | 201,211 | ||||||
Accrued interest receivable |
15,038 | 15,038 | ||||||
Financial liabilities: |
||||||||
Deposits: |
||||||||
Demand and non-interest bearing |
$ | 479,512 | $ | 479,512 | ||||
Savings and interest-bearing transaction accounts |
1,143,335 | 1,143,335 | ||||||
Time deposits |
1,262,202 | 1,268,988 | ||||||
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase |
62,407 | 62,407 | ||||||
FHLB and other borrowed funds |
142,901 | 151,277 | ||||||
Accrued interest payable |
2,264 | 2,264 | ||||||
Subordinated debentures |
44,331 | 47,451 |
December 31, 2010 | ||||||||
Carrying | ||||||||
Amount | Fair Value | |||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Financial assets: |
||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 287,532 | $ | 287,532 | ||||
Federal funds sold |
27,848 | 27,848 | ||||||
Loans receivable not covered by loss share, net of non-covered
impaired loans and allowance |
1,777,149 | 1,770,147 | ||||||
Loans receivable covered by FDIC loss share |
575,776 | 575,776 | ||||||
FDIC indemnification asset |
227,258 | 227,258 | ||||||
Accrued interest receivable |
16,176 | 16,176 | ||||||
Financial liabilities: |
||||||||
Deposits: |
||||||||
Demand and non-interest bearing |
$ | 392,622 | $ | 392,622 | ||||
Savings and interest-bearing transaction accounts |
1,108,309 | 1,108,309 | ||||||
Time deposits |
1,460,867 | 1,463,922 | ||||||
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase |
74,459 | 74,459 | ||||||
FHLB and other borrowed funds |
177,270 | 179,851 | ||||||
Accrued interest payable |
3,004 | 3,004 | ||||||
Subordinated debentures |
44,331 | 48,162 |
34
Table of Contents
18: Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In July 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-20, Receivables (Topic 310) Disclosures about
the Credit Quality of Financing Receivables and the Allowance for Credit Losses. ASU 2010-20
requires entities to provide disclosures designed to facilitate financial statement users
evaluation of (i) the nature of credit risk inherent in the entitys portfolio of financing
receivables, (ii) how that risk is analyzed and assessed in arriving at the allowance for credit
losses and (iii) the changes and reasons for those changes in the allowance for credit losses.
Disclosures must be disaggregated by portfolio segment, the level at which an entity develops and
documents a systematic method for determining its allowance for credit losses, and class of
financing receivable, which is generally a disaggregation of portfolio segment. The required
disclosures include, among other things, a rollforward of the allowance for credit losses as well
as information about modified, impaired, non-accrual and past due loans and credit quality
indicators. The Company adopted the period end disclosures provisions of the new authoritative
guidance under ASC Topic 310 in the reporting period ending December 31, 2010. Adoption of the new
guidance did not have an impact on the Companys statements of income and financial condition. The
Company adopted the disclosures provisions of the new authoritative guidance about activity that
occurs during a reporting period on January 1, 2011; the adoption did not have an impact on the
Companys statements of income and financial condition. The disclosures related to loans modified
in a troubled debt restructuring were effective for the reporting periods ending after June 15,
2011. The Company adopted the troubled debt restructuring disclosures during the quarter ended June
30, 2011 and the adoption had no impact on the Companys statements of income and financial
condition.
In April 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-02, Receivables (Topic 310) A Creditors
Determination of Whether a Restructuring is a Troubled Debt Restructuring. ASU 2011-02 amended
prior guidance to provide assistance in determining whether a modification of the terms of a
receivable meets the definition of a troubled debt restructuring. The new authoritative guidance
provides clarification for evaluating whether a concession has been granted and whether a debtor is
experiencing financial difficulties. The new authoritative guidance was effective for the
reporting periods after June 15, 2011 and was applied retrospectively to restructurings occurring
on or after January 1, 2011. Adoption of the new guidance had no significant impact on the
Companys statements of income and financial condition.
In September 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-08, IntangiblesGoodwill and Other (Topic
350) Testing Goodwill for Impairment. ASU 2011-08 simplifies how entities test goodwill for
impairment by providing entities with the option of first performing a qualitative assessment on
none, some, or all of its reporting units to determine whether further quantitative impairment
testing is necessary. An entity may also bypass the qualitative assessment for any reporting unit
in any period and proceed directly to the quantitative impairment test. The new authoritative
guidance is effective for annual and interim goodwill impairment tests performed for fiscal years
beginning after December 15, 2011, with early adoption permitted. The Company does not expect the
adoption of the amended accounting guidance will have a material effect on Companys consolidated
financial statements.
Presently, the Company is not aware of any other changes from the Financial Accounting
Standards Board that will have a material impact on the Companys present or future financial
statements.
35
Table of Contents
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Audit Committee, Board of Directors and Stockholders
Home BancShares, Inc.
Conway, Arkansas
Home BancShares, Inc.
Conway, Arkansas
We have reviewed the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet of Home BancShares, Inc. as
of September 30, 2011 and the related condensed consolidated statements of income for the
three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2011 and September 30, 2010 and condensed
consolidated statements of stockholders equity and cash flows for the nine-month periods ended
September 30, 2011 and 2010. These interim financial statements are the responsibility of the
Companys management.
We conducted our reviews in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (United States). A review of interim financial information consists principally of
applying analytical procedures to financial data and making inquiries of persons responsible for
financial and accounting matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in
accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, the objective of
which is the expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole.
Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.
Based on our reviews, we are not aware of any material modifications that should be made to the
condensed consolidated financial statements referred to above for them to be in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
We have previously audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2010, and the
related consolidated statements of income, stockholders equity and cash flows for the year then
ended (not presented herein); and in our report dated March 10, 2011, we expressed an unqualified
opinion on those consolidated financial statements. In our opinion, the information set forth in
the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2010, is fairly stated, in
all material respects, in relation to the consolidated balance sheet from which it has been
derived.
/s/ BKD, LLP
Little Rock, Arkansas
November 8, 2011
November 8, 2011
36
Table of Contents
Item 2:
|
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS |
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our Form 10-K, filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on March 10, 2011, which includes the audited financial
statements for the year ended December 31, 2010. Unless the context requires otherwise, the terms
Company, us, we, and our refer to Home BancShares, Inc. on a consolidated basis.
General
We are a bank holding company headquartered in Conway, Arkansas, offering a broad array of
financial services through our wholly owned bank subsidiary, Centennial Bank. As of September 30,
2011, we had, on a consolidated basis, total assets of $3.62 billion, loans receivable of $2.34
billion, total deposits of $2.89 billion, and stockholders equity of $463.1 million.
We generate most of our revenue from interest on loans and investments, service charges, and
mortgage banking income. Deposits and FHLB borrowed funds are our primary sources of funding. Our
largest expenses are interest on our funding sources and salaries and related employee benefits. We
measure our performance by calculating our return on average common equity, return on average
assets, and net interest margin. We also measure our performance by our efficiency ratio, which is
calculated by dividing non-interest expense less amortization of core deposit intangibles by the
sum of net interest income on a tax equivalent basis and non-interest income.
Key Financial Measures
As of or for the Three Months | As of or for the Nine Months | |||||||||||||||
Ended September 30, | Ended September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands, except per | ||||||||||||||||
share data) | ||||||||||||||||
Total assets |
$ | 3,622,166 | $ | 3,392,137 | $ | 3,622,166 | $ | 3,392,137 | ||||||||
Loans receivable not covered by loss share |
1,826,373 | 1,955,263 | 1,826,373 | 1,955,263 | ||||||||||||
Loans receivable covered by FDIC loss share |
511,326 | 408,239 | 511,326 | 408,239 | ||||||||||||
Total deposits |
2,885,049 | 2,564,436 | 2,885,049 | 2,564,436 | ||||||||||||
Total stockholders equity |
463,139 | 498,468 | 463,139 | 498,468 | ||||||||||||
Net income |
14,312 | 9,560 | 40,574 | 31,398 | ||||||||||||
Net income available to common stockholders |
13,824 | 8,890 | 38,746 | 29,388 | ||||||||||||
Basic earnings per common share |
0.48 | 0.32 | 1.36 | 1.04 | ||||||||||||
Diluted earnings per common share |
0.48 | 0.31 | 1.35 | 1.03 | ||||||||||||
Diluted earnings per common share excluding
intangible amortization (1) |
0.50 | 0.33 | 1.40 | 1.07 | ||||||||||||
Annualized net interest margin FTE |
4.75 | % | 4.35 | % | 4.68 | % | 4.30 | % | ||||||||
Efficiency ratio |
49.23 | 52.14 | 50.09 | 47.82 | ||||||||||||
Annualized return on average assets |
1.56 | 1.15 | 1.48 | 1.38 | ||||||||||||
Annualized return on average common equity |
12.00 | 7.81 | 11.67 | 9.06 |
(1) | See Table 16 Diluted Earnings Per Share Excluding Intangible Amortization for a reconciliation to GAAP for diluted earnings per share excluding intangible amortization. |
37
Table of Contents
Overview
Results of Operations for Three Months Ended September 30, 2011 and 2010
Our net income increased 49.7% to $14.3 million for the three-month period ended September 30,
2011, from $9.6 million for the same period in 2010. On a diluted earnings per share basis, our
earnings were $0.48 and $0.31 for the three-month periods ended September 30, 2011 and 2010,
respectively. The $4.8 million increase in net income is primarily associated with increased
additional net interest income resulting from our 2010 FDIC-assisted acquisitions combined with a
40 basis point increase in net interest margin, no provision for loan losses as a result of
improved asset quality for the third quarter of 2011, no merger related expenses for the third
quarter 2011 and gain on sale of OREO in the third quarter of 2011 when compared to the OREO loss
in the third quarter of 2010 offset by the expected reduction in income from FDIC indemnification
accretion and increased costs associated with the asset growth.
Our annualized return on average assets was 1.56% for the three months ended September 30,
2011, compared to 1.15% for the same period in 2010. Our annualized return on average common
equity was 12.00% for the three months ended September 30, 2011, compared to 7.81% for the same
period in 2010, respectively. The improvements in our ratios from 2010 to 2011 are consistent with
the previously discussed changes in earnings for the three months ended September 30, 2011,
compared to the same period in 2010.
Our annualized net interest margin, on a fully taxable equivalent basis, was 4.75% for the
three months ended September 30, 2011, compared to 4.35% for the same period in 2010. Our ability
to improve pricing on our loan portfolio and interest bearing deposits allowed the Company to
expand net interest margin. Our FDIC-assisted acquisitions have helped improve the yield on the
loan portfolio. For the three months ended the effective yield on non-covered loans and covered
loans was 6.49% and 7.20%, respectively.
Our efficiency ratio was 49.23% for the three months ended September 30, 2011, compared to
52.14% for the same period in 2010. The improvement in the efficiency ratio is primarily
associated with increased additional net interest income resulting from our 2010 FDIC-assisted
acquisitions combined with a 40 basis point increase in net interest margin, no merger related
expenses for the third quarter 2011 and gain on sale of OREO in the third quarter of 2011 when
compared to the OREO loss in the third quarter of 2010 offset by the expected reduction in income
from FDIC indemnification accretion and increased costs associated with the asset growth.
Results of Operations for Nine Months Ended September 30, 2011 and 2010
Our net income increased 29.2% to $40.6 million for the nine-month period ended September 30,
2011, from $31.4 million for the same period in 2010. On a diluted earnings per share basis, our
earnings were $1.35 and $1.03 for the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2011 and 2010,
respectively. During the first nine months of 2010, the Company acquired Old Southern Bank, Key
West Bank, Coastal Community Bank and Bayside Savings Bank in FDIC-assisted acquisitions. These
transactions resulted in a $9.3 million pre-tax gain on acquisitions and $3.0 million of merger and
acquisition expenses for the first nine months of 2010. Excluding the financial impact of these
two items, the Company would have reported $27.5 million or $0.89 diluted earnings per share for
the first nine months of 2010. Excluding these items, our net income increased $13.0 million or
47.4% which was a result primarily associated with our increase in net interest income from the
additional earning assets obtained in our FDIC-assisted transactions combined with a 38 basis point
improvement in net interest margin, reduced provision for loan losses as a result of improving
asset quality for 2011 plus new income from FDIC indemnification accretion offset by increased
costs associated with the asset growth.
Our annualized return on average assets was 1.48% for the nine months ended September 30,
2011, compared to 1.38% for the same period in 2010. Our annualized return on average common
equity was 11.67% for the nine months ended September 30, 2011, compared to 9.06% for the same
period in 2010, respectively. Excluding the financial impact of the net acquisition gains for the
first nine months of 2010; our annualized return on average assets and annualized return on average
common equity was 1.21% and 7.87%, respectively. This reflects an improvement in our ratios from
2010 to 2011 consistent with the previously discussed changes in earnings for the nine months ended
September 30, 2011, compared to the same period in 2010.
38
Table of Contents
Our annualized net interest margin, on a fully taxable equivalent basis, was 4.68% for the
nine months ended September 30, 2011, compared to 4.30% for the same period in 2010. Our ability
to improve pricing on our loan portfolio and interest bearing deposits allowed the Company to
expand net interest margin. Our FDIC-assisted acquisitions have helped improve the yield on the
loan portfolio. For the nine months ended the effective yield on non-covered loans and covered
loans was 6.49% and 7.02%, respectively.
Our efficiency ratio was 50.09% for the nine months ended September 30, 2011, compared to
47.82% for the same period in 2010. Excluding the financial impact of the net acquisition gains
for the first nine months of 2010; our efficiency ratio was 49.18%. While we were able to improve
net interest income and improve our net interest margin by 38 basis points plus new income from
FDIC indemnification accretion the lack of progress in our ratio from 2010 to 2011 primarily
resulted from the cost increases associated with our newly acquired FDIC-assisted branches.
Financial Condition as of and for the Period Ended September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010
Our total assets as of September 30, 2011 decreased $140.5 million, an annualized reduction of
5.0%, to $3.62 billion from the $3.76 billion reported as of December 31, 2010. Our loan portfolio
not covered by loss share decreased by $66.0 million, an annualized reduction of 4.7%, to $1.83
billion as of September 30, 2011, from $1.89 billion as of December 31, 2010. Our loan portfolio
covered by loss share decreased by $64.5 million, an annualized reduction of 15.0%, to $511.3
million as of September 30, 2011, from $575.8 million as of December 31, 2010. Stockholders
equity decreased $13.8 million to $463.1 million as of September 30, 2011, compared to $476.9
million as of December 31, 2010. Common stockholders equity was $463.1 million at September 30,
2011 compared to $427.5 million at December 31, 2010, an increase of $35.7 million. The decrease in
assets is primarily associated with historically low loan demand and payoffs in our non-covered and
covered loan portfolios. The decrease in stockholders equity is primarily associated with the
Company repaying the TARP funds during the third quarter of 2011 offset by the $49.1 million of
comprehensive income less the $6.6 million of dividends paid for 2011 and the $5.5 million used to
repurchase 250,000 shares of common stock. The annualized decline in stockholders equity for the
first nine months of 2011 was 3.9%.
As of September 30, 2011, our non-performing non-covered loans decreased to $27.9 million, or
1.53%, of total non-covered loans from $49.5 million, or 2.62%, of total non-covered loans as of
December 31, 2010. The allowance for loan losses as a percent of non-performing loans increased to
195.69% as of September 30, 2011, compared to 107.77% as of December 31, 2010. Non-performing
non-covered loans in Arkansas were $8.6 million at September 30, 2011 compared to $23.4 million as
of December 31, 2010. Non-performing non-covered loans in Florida were $19.2 million at September
30, 2011 compared to $26.1 million as of December 31, 2010.
As of September 30, 2011, our non-performing non-covered assets improved to $44.6 million, or
1.55%, of total non-covered assets from $61.2 million, or 2.08%, of total non-covered assets as of
December 31, 2010. Non-performing non-covered assets in Arkansas were $20.4 million at September
30, 2011 compared to $28.7 million as of December 31, 2010. Non-performing non-covered assets in
Florida were $24.2 million at September 30, 2011 compared to $32.5 million as of December 31, 2010.
Critical Accounting Policies
Overview. We prepare our consolidated financial statements based on the selection of certain
accounting policies, generally accepted accounting principles and customary practices in the
banking industry. These policies, in certain areas, require us to make significant estimates and
assumptions. Our accounting policies are described in detail in the notes to our consolidated
financial statements in Note 1 of the audited consolidated financial statements included in our
Form 10-K, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
39
Table of Contents
We consider a policy critical if (i) the accounting estimate requires assumptions about
matters that are highly uncertain at the time of the accounting estimate; and (ii) different
estimates that could reasonably have been used in the current period, or changes in the accounting
estimate that are reasonably likely to occur from period to period, would have a material impact on
our financial statements. Using these criteria, we believe that the accounting policies most
critical to us are those associated with our lending practices, including the accounting for the
allowance for loan losses, acquisition accounting for covered loans and related indemnification
asset, investments, intangible assets, income taxes and stock options.
Investments. Securities available for sale are reported at fair value with unrealized holding
gains and losses reported as a separate component of stockholders equity and other comprehensive
income (loss). Securities that are held as available for sale are used as a part of our
asset/liability management strategy. Securities that may be sold in response to interest rate
changes, changes in prepayment risk, the need to increase regulatory capital, and other similar
factors are classified as available for sale.
Loans Receivable Not Covered by Loss Share and Allowance for Loan Losses. Substantially all
of our loans receivable not covered by loss share are reported at their outstanding principal
balance adjusted for any charge-offs, as it is managements intent to hold them for the foreseeable
future or until maturity or payoff, except for mortgage loans held for sale. Interest income on
loans is accrued over the term of the loans based on the principal balance outstanding.
The allowance for loan losses is established through a provision for loan losses charged
against income. The allowance represents an amount that, in managements judgment, will be adequate
to absorb probable credit losses on identifiable loans that may become uncollectible and probable
credit losses inherent in the remainder of the loan portfolio. The amounts of provisions for loan
losses are based on managements analysis and evaluation of the loan portfolio for identification
of problem credits, internal and external factors that may affect collectability, relevant credit
exposure, particular risks inherent in different kinds of lending, current collateral values and
other relevant factors.
The allowance consists of allocated and general components. The allocated component relates
to loans that are classified as impaired. For those loans that are classified as impaired, an
allowance is established when the discounted cash flows, or collateral value or observable market
price of the impaired loan is lower than the carrying value of that loan. The general component
covers non-classified loans and is based on historical charge-off experience and expected loss
given default derived from the Banks internal risk rating process. Other adjustments may be made
to the allowance for pools of loans after an assessment of internal or external influences on
credit quality that are not fully reflected in the historical loss or risking rating data.
Loans considered impaired, under FASB ASC 310-10-35, are loans for which, based on current
information and events, it is probable that the Company will be unable to collect all amounts due
according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. The Company applies this policy even if
delays or shortfalls in payment are expected to be insignificant. The aggregate amount of
impairment of loans is utilized in evaluating the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses and
amount of provisions thereto. Losses on impaired loans are charged against the allowance for loan
losses when in the process of collection it appears likely that such losses will be realized. The
accrual of interest on impaired loans is discontinued when, in managements opinion the collection
of interest is doubtful, or generally when loans are 90 days or more past due. When accrual of
interest is discontinued, all unpaid accrued interest is reversed. Interest income is subsequently
recognized only to the extent cash payments are received in excess of principal due. Loans are
returned to accrual status when all the principal and interest amounts contractually due are
brought current and future payments are reasonably assured.
Groups of loans with similar risk characteristics are collectively evaluated for impairment
based on the groups historical loss experience adjusted for changes in trends, conditions and
other relevant factors that affect repayment of the loans.
40
Table of Contents
Loans are placed on non-accrual status when management believes that the borrowers financial
condition, after giving consideration to economic and business conditions and collection efforts,
is such that collection of interest is doubtful, or generally when loans are 90 days or more past
due. Loans are charged against the allowance for loan losses when management believes that the
collectability of the principal is unlikely. Accrued interest related to non-accrual loans is
generally charged against the allowance for loan losses when accrued in prior years and reversed
from interest income if accrued in the current year. Interest income on non-accrual loans may be
recognized to the extent cash payments are received, although the majority of payments received are
usually applied to principal. Non-accrual loans are generally returned to accrual status when
principal and interest payments are less than 90 days past due, the customer has made required
payments for at least six months, and we reasonably expect to collect all principal and interest.
Acquisition Accounting, Covered Loans and Related Indemnification Asset. The Company accounts
for its acquisitions under ASC Topic 805, Business Combinations, which requires the use of the
purchase method of accounting. All identifiable assets acquired, including loans, are recorded at
fair value. No allowance for loan losses related to the acquired loans is recorded on the
acquisition date as the fair value of the loans acquired incorporates assumptions regarding credit
risk. Loans acquired are recorded at fair value in accordance with the fair value methodology
prescribed in ASC Topic 820, exclusive of the shared-loss agreements with the Federal Deposit
Insurance Corporation (FDIC). The fair value estimates associated with the loans include estimates
related to expected prepayments and the amount and timing of undiscounted expected principal,
interest and other cash flows.
Over the life of the acquired loans, the Company continues to estimate cash flows expected to
be collected on pools of loans sharing common risk characteristics, which are treated in the
aggregate when applying various valuation techniques. The Company evaluates at each balance sheet
date whether the present value of its pools of loans determined using the effective interest rates
has decreased and if so, recognizes a provision for loan loss in its consolidated statement of
income. For any increases in cash flows expected to be collected, the Company adjusts the amount of
accretable yield recognized on a prospective basis over the pools remaining life.
Because the FDIC will reimburse the Company for certain acquired loans should the Company
experience a loss, an indemnification asset is recorded at fair value at the acquisition date. The
indemnification asset is recognized at the same time as the indemnified loans, and measured on the
same basis, subject to collectability or contractual limitations. The shared-loss agreements on the
acquisition date reflect the reimbursements expected to be received from the FDIC, using an
appropriate discount rate, which reflects counterparty credit risk and other uncertainties.
The shared-loss agreements continue to be measured on the same basis as the related
indemnified loans. Because the acquired loans are subject to the accounting prescribed by ASC Topic
310, subsequent changes to the basis of the shared-loss agreements also follow that model.
Deterioration in the credit quality of the loans (immediately recorded as an adjustment to the
allowance for loan losses) would immediately increase the basis of the shared-loss agreements, with
the offset recorded through the consolidated statement of income. Increases in the credit quality
or cash flows of loans (reflected as an adjustment to yield and accreted into income over the
remaining life of the loans) decrease the basis of the shared-loss agreements, with such decrease
being accreted into income over 1) the same period or 2) the life of the shared-loss agreements,
whichever is shorter. Loss assumptions used in the basis of the indemnified loans are consistent
with the loss assumptions used to measure the indemnification asset. Fair value accounting
incorporates into the fair value of the indemnification asset an element of the time value of
money, which is accreted back into income over the life of the shared-loss agreements.
Upon the determination of an incurred loss the indemnification asset will be reduced by the
amount owed by the FDIC. A corresponding claim receivable is recorded until cash is received from
the FDIC.
Intangible Assets. Intangible assets consist of goodwill and core deposit intangibles.
Goodwill represents the excess purchase price over the fair value of net assets acquired in
business acquisitions. The core deposit intangible represents the excess intangible value of
acquired deposit customer relationships as determined by valuation specialists. The core deposit
intangibles are being amortized over 48 to 114 months on a straight-line basis. Goodwill is not
amortized but rather is evaluated for impairment on at least an annual basis. We perform an annual
impairment test of goodwill and core deposit intangibles as required by FASB ASC 350, Intangibles -
Goodwill and Other in the fourth quarter.
41
Table of Contents
Income Taxes. The Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with income tax accounting
guidance (ASC 740, Income Taxes). The income tax accounting guidance results in two components of
income tax expense: current and deferred. Current income tax expense reflects taxes to be paid or
refunded for the current period by applying the provisions of the enacted tax law to the taxable
income or excess of deductions over revenues. The Company determines deferred income taxes using
the liability (or balance sheet) method. Under this method, the net deferred tax asset or
liability is based on the tax effects of the differences between the book and tax bases of assets
and liabilities, and enacted changes in tax rates and laws are recognized in the period in which
they occur.
Deferred income tax expense results from changes in deferred tax assets and liabilities
between periods. Deferred tax assets are recognized if it is more likely than not, based on the
technical merits, that the tax position will be realized or sustained upon examination. The term
more likely than not means a likelihood of more than 50 percent; the terms examined and upon
examination also include resolution of the related appeals or litigation processes, if any. A tax
position that meets the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold is initially and subsequently
measured as the largest amount of tax benefit that has a greater than 50 percent likelihood of
being realized upon settlement with a taxing authority that has full knowledge of all relevant
information. The determination of whether or not a tax position has met the more-likely-than-not
recognition threshold considers the facts, circumstances and information available at the reporting
date and is subject to the managements judgment. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation
allowance if, based on the weight of evidence available, it is more likely than not that some
portion or all of a deferred tax asset will not be realized.
The Company and its subsidiary file consolidated tax returns. Its subsidiary provides for
income taxes on a separate return basis, and remits to the Company amounts determined to be
currently payable.
Acquisitions
Acquisition Old Southern Bank
On March 12, 2010, Centennial Bank entered into a purchase and assumption agreement (Old
Southern Agreement) with the FDIC, as receiver, pursuant to which Centennial Bank acquired certain
assets and assumed substantially all of the deposits and certain liabilities of Old Southern Bank
(Old Southern).
Prior to the acquisition, Old Southern operated 7 banking centers in the Orlando, Florida
metropolitan area. The Company has kept open all of these locations except for one location in
downtown Orlando. Including the effects of purchase accounting adjustments, Centennial Bank
acquired $342.6 million in assets and assumed approximately $328.5 million of the deposits of Old
Southern. Additionally, Centennial Bank purchased covered loans with an estimated fair value of
$179.1 million, $3.0 million of foreclosed assets and $30.4 million of investment securities.
See Note 2 Business Combinations of Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (SEC) in March 2011 for additional discussion related to the acquisition of Old
Southern.
Acquisition Key West Bank
On March 26, 2010, Centennial Bank, entered into a purchase and assumption agreement (Key West
Bank Agreement) with the FDIC, as receiver, pursuant to which Centennial Bank acquired certain
assets and assumed substantially all of the deposits and certain liabilities of Key West Bank (Key
West).
Prior to the acquisition, Key West operated one banking center located in Key West, Florida.
Including the effects of purchase accounting adjustments, Centennial Bank acquired $89.6 million in
assets and assumed approximately $66.7 million of the deposits of Key West. Additionally,
Centennial Bank purchased covered loans with an estimated fair value of $46.9 million, $5.7 million
of foreclosed assets and assumed $20.0 million of FHLB advances.
See Note 2 Business Combinations of Form 10-K filed with the SEC in March 2011 for
additional discussion related to the acquisition of Key West.
42
Table of Contents
Acquisition Coastal Community Bank and Bayside Savings Bank
On July 30, 2010, Centennial Bank entered into separate purchase and assumption agreements
with the FDIC (collectively, the Coastal-Bayside Agreements), as receiver for each bank, pursuant
to which Centennial Bank acquired the loans and certain assets and assumed the deposits and certain
liabilities of Coastal Community Bank (Coastal) and Bayside Savings Bank (Bayside), respectively.
These two institutions had been under common ownership of Coastal Community Investments, Inc.
Prior to the acquisition, Coastal and Bayside operated 12 banking centers in the Florida
Panhandle area. Including the effects of purchase accounting adjustments, Centennial Bank acquired
$436.8 million in assets and assumed approximately $424.6 million of the deposits of Coastal and
Bayside. Additionally, Centennial Bank purchased covered loans with an estimated fair value of
$200.6 million, non-covered loans with an estimated fair value of $4.1 million, $9.6 million of
foreclosed assets and $18.5 million of investment securities.
See Note 2 Business Combinations of Form 10-K filed with the SEC in March 2011 for
additional discussion related to the acquisition of Coastal and Bayside.
Acquisition Wakulla Bank
On October 1, 2010, Centennial Bank entered into a purchase and assumption agreement with the
FDIC, as receiver, pursuant to which Centennial Bank acquired the performing loans and certain
assets and assumed substantially all of the deposits and certain liabilities of Wakulla Bank
(Wakulla).
Prior to the acquisition, Wakulla operated 12 banking centers in the Florida Panhandle.
Including the effects of purchase accounting adjustments, Centennial Bank acquired approximately
$377.9 million in assets and assumed approximately $356.2 million in deposits of Wakulla.
Additionally, Centennial Bank purchased performing covered loans of approximately $148.2 million,
performing non-covered loans with an estimated fair value of $17.6 million, $45.9 million of
marketable securities and $27.6 million of federal funds sold.
See Note 2 Business Combinations of Form 10-K filed with the SEC in March 2011 for
additional discussion related to the acquisition of Wakulla.
Acquisition Gulf State Community Bank
On November 19, 2010, Centennial Bank entered into a purchase and assumption agreement with
the FDIC, as receiver, pursuant to which Centennial Bank acquired the loans and certain assets and
assumed substantially all of the deposits and certain liabilities of Gulf State Community Bank
(Gulf State).
Prior to the acquisition, Gulf State operated 5 banking centers in the Florida Panhandle.
Including the effects of purchase accounting adjustments, Centennial Bank acquired approximately
$118.2 million in assets and assumed approximately $97.7 million in deposits of Gulf State.
Additionally, Centennial Bank purchased covered loans with an estimated fair value of $41.2
million, non-covered loans with an estimated fair value of $1.7 million, $4.7 million of foreclosed
assets and $10.8 million of investment securities.
See Note 2 Business Combinations of Form 10-K filed with the SEC in March 2011 for
additional discussion related to the acquisition of Gulf State.
43
Table of Contents
FDIC-Assisted Acquisitions
The acquisitions of Old Southern Bank, Key West Bank, Coastal Community Bank, Bayside Savings
Bank, Wakulla Bank and Gulf State Community Bank are seen as attractive by Home BancShares. The
transactions provide the ability to expand into opportunistic markets and increase market share in
Florida. The transactions are anticipated to be profitable due to the pricing associated with the
acquired loan portfolio and the establishment of the indemnification asset. The ability to add
immediate deposit growth helps to supplement organic deposit growth. Also, reduction in the
duplication of efforts and centralization of functions within the organizations is expected to lead
to increased efficiencies and increased profitability. Should the acquired markets not perform as
expected, the losses associated with the covered assets significantly exceed expectations or the
operational efforts required to integrate the acquisitions and manage the loss share require
significantly more resources than anticipated, the overall financial performance of the acquired
institutions may not reach expectations which may adversely affect the overall financial
performance of our Company.
FDIC-Assisted Acquisitions True Up
Our purchase and assumption agreements in connection with our FDIC-assisted acquisitions allow
the FDIC to recover a portion of the loss share funds previously paid out under the indemnification
agreements in the event losses fail to reach the expected loss under a claw back provision. Should
the markets associated with any of the banks we acquired through FDIC-assisted transactions perform
better than initially projected, the Bank is required to pay this clawback (or true-up) payment
to the FDIC on a specified date following the tenth anniversary of such acquisition (the True-Up
Measurement Date).
Specifically, in connection with the Old Southern and Key West acquisitions, such true-up
payments would be equal to 50% of the excess, if any, of (i) 20% of a stated threshold of $110.0
million in the case of Old Southern and $23.0 million in the case of Key West, less (ii) the sum of
(A) 25% of the asset premium (discount) plus (B) 25% of the Cumulative Shared Loss Payments
(defined as the aggregate of all of the payments made or payable to Centennial Bank minus the
aggregate of all of the payments made or payable to the FDIC) plus (C) the Period Servicing Amounts
for any twelve-month period prior to and ending on the True-Up Measurement Date (defined as the
product of the simple average of the principal amount of shared loss loans and shared loss assets
(other than shared loss securities) at the beginning and end of such period times 1%).
In connection with the Coastal-Bayside, Wakulla and Gulf State acquisitions, the true-up
payments would be equal to 50% of the excess, if any, of (i) 20% of an intrinsic loss estimate of
$121.0 million in the case of Coastal, $24.0 million in the case of Bayside, $73.0 million in the
case of Wakulla and $35.0 million in the case of Gulf State, less (ii) the sum of (A) 20% of the
net loss amount (the sum of all losses less the sum of all recoveries on covered assets) plus (B)
25% of the asset premium (discount) plus (C) 3.5% of the total loans subject to loss sharing under
the loss sharing agreements as specified in the schedules to the agreements.
Future Acquisitions
In our continuing evaluation of our growth plans for the Company, we believe properly priced
bank acquisitions can complement our organic growth and de novo branching growth strategies. In
the near term, our principal acquisition focus will be to expand our presence in Florida, Arkansas
and other nearby markets through pursuing additional FDIC-assisted acquisition opportunities and
non FDIC-assisted bank acquisitions. While we seek to be a successful bidder to the FDIC on one or
more additional failed depository institutions within our targeted markets, there is no assurance
that we will be the winning bidder on other FDIC-assisted transactions.
We will continue evaluating all types of potential bank acquisitions to determine what is in
the best interest of our Company. Our goal in making these decisions is to maximize the return to
our investors.
44
Table of Contents
Branches
We intend to continue to open new (commonly referred to as de novo) branches in our current
markets and in other attractive market areas if opportunities arise. Presently, we are evaluating
additional opportunities but have no firm commitments for any additional de novo branch locations.
During 2010, Centennial Bank entered into six loss sharing agreements with the FDIC. Through
these six transactions, the Company has added a net total of thirty-six branch locations in
Florida. These branch locations include one in the Florida Keys, six in the Greater Orlando MSA,
and twenty-nine in the Florida Panhandle, which contains seven locations in the Panama City MSA and
ten locations in the Tallahassee MSA. Additionally, one legacy branch in Duck Key was closed
during the fourth quarter of 2010.
During our FDIC-assisted acquisitions, the Company initially kept open all branch locations of
the failed institutions. Upon acquisition, the Company has 90 days to determine its desire not to
retain certain branch locations and an additional 90 days to complete the branch closure. The
Company has subsequently evaluated all of the branch locations acquired from the FDIC-assisted
acquisitions. As a result of the evaluation process for cost saving opportunities as part of our
aspirations to maximize efficiencies, the Company notified the FDIC of its desire not to acquire
certain branch locations. During the first quarter of 2011, the Company completed seven strategic
branch closures. These include one branch in Port St. Joe and one grocery store branch in each of
the Crawfordville and Blountstown locations. The remaining four strategic branch closures during
the first quarter were branches associated with the acquisition of Gulf State Community Bank in
2010. The Company completed one additional branch closure during the second quarter associated
with the Gulf State acquisition. The Company believes it has the appropriate infrastructure to
service its acquired customer base with the branches retained.
Results of Operations
For Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2011 and 2010
Our net income increased 49.7% to $14.3 million for the three-month period ended September 30,
2011, from $9.6 million for the same period in 2010. On a diluted earnings per share basis, our
earnings were $0.48 and $0.31 for the three-month periods ended September 30, 2011 and 2010,
respectively. The $4.8 million increase in net income is primarily associated with increased
additional net interest income resulting from our 2010 FDIC-assisted acquisitions combined with a
40 basis point increase in net interest margin, no provision for loan losses as a result of
improved asset quality for the third quarter of 2011, no merger related expenses for the third
quarter 2011 and gain on sale of OREO in the third quarter of 2011 when compared to the OREO loss
in the third quarter of 2010 offset by the expected reduction in income from FDIC indemnification
accretion and increased costs associated with the asset growth.
Our net income increased 29.2% to $40.6 million for the nine-month period ended September 30,
2011, from $31.4 million for the same period in 2010. On a diluted earnings per share basis, our
earnings were $1.35 and $1.03 for the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2011 and 2010,
respectively. During the first nine months of 2010, the Company acquired Old Southern Bank, Key
West Bank, Coastal Community Bank and Bayside Savings Bank in FDIC-assisted acquisitions. These
transactions resulted in a $9.3 million pre-tax gain on acquisitions and $3.0 million of merger and
acquisition expenses for the first nine months of 2010. Excluding the financial impact of these
two items, the Company would have reported $27.5 million or $0.89 diluted earnings per share for
the first nine months of 2010. Excluding these items, our net income increased $13.0 million or
47.4% which was a result primarily associated with our increase in net interest income from the
additional earning assets obtained in our FDIC-assisted transactions combined with a 38 basis point
improvement in net interest margin, reduced provision for loan losses as a result of improving
asset quality for 2011 plus new income from FDIC indemnification accretion offset by increased
costs associated with the asset growth.
45
Table of Contents
Net Interest Income
Net interest income, our principal source of earnings, is the difference between the interest
income generated by earning assets and the total interest cost of the deposits and borrowings
obtained to fund those assets. Factors affecting the level of net interest income include the
volume of earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, yields earned on loans and investments
and rates paid on deposits and other borrowings, the level of non-performing loans and the amount
of non-interest-bearing liabilities supporting earning assets. Net interest income is analyzed in
the discussion and tables below on a fully taxable equivalent basis. The adjustment to convert
certain income to a fully taxable equivalent basis consists of dividing tax-exempt income by one
minus the combined federal and state income tax rate.
The Federal Reserve Board sets various benchmark rates, including the Federal Funds rate, and
thereby influences the general market rates of interest, including the deposit and loan rates
offered by financial institutions. The Federal Funds rate, which is the cost to banks of
immediately available overnight funds, began in 2008 at 4.25%. During 2008, the rate decreased by
75 basis points on January 22, 2008, 50 basis points on January 30, 2008, 75 basis points on March
18, 2008, 25 basis points on April 30, 2008 and 50 basis points to a rate of 1.50% as of October 8,
2008. The rate continued to fall 50 basis points on October 29, 2008 and 75 to 100 basis points to
a low of 0.25% to 0% on December 16, 2008, where the rate has remained.
Net interest income on a fully taxable equivalent basis increased $5.6 million, or 17.9%, to
$36.8 million for the three-month period ended September 30, 2011, from $31.2 million for the same
period in 2010. This increase in net interest income was the result of a $4.2 million increase in
interest income combined with a $1.4 million decrease in interest expense. The $4.2 million
increase in interest income was primarily the result of a higher level of earning assets combined
with improved pricing of our earning assets. The higher level of earning assets resulted in an
increase in interest income of $2.0 million, while the repricing of our earning assets resulted in
a $2.3 million increase in interest income for the three-month period ended September 30, 2011.
The $1.4 million decrease in interest expense for the three-month period ended September 30, 2011,
is primarily the result of our interest bearing liabilities repricing in the lower interest rate
environment offset by an increase in our interest bearing liabilities. The repricing of our
interest bearing liabilities in the lower interest rate environment resulted in a $1.4 million
decrease in interest expense. The higher level of our interest bearing liabilities resulted in
additional interest expense of $47,000.
Net interest income on a fully taxable equivalent basis increased $23.0 million, or 26.7%, to
$109.3 million for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2011, from $86.2 million for the same
period in 2010. This increase in net interest income was the result of a $20.9 million increase in
interest income combined with a $2.1 million decrease in interest expense. The $20.9 million
increase in interest income was primarily the result of a higher level of earning assets combined
with improved pricing of our earning assets. The higher level of earning assets resulted in an
increase in interest income of $14.8 million, while the repricing of our earning assets resulted in
a $6.1 million increase in interest income for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2011. The
$2.1 million decrease in interest expense for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2011, is
primarily the result of our interest bearing liabilities repricing in the lower interest rate
environment offset by an increase in our interest bearing liabilities. The repricing of our
interest bearing liabilities in the lower interest rate environment resulted in a $4.8 million
decrease in interest expense. The higher level of our interest bearing liabilities resulted in
additional interest expense of $2.7 million.
Net interest margin, on a fully taxable equivalent basis, was 4.75% and 4.68% for the three
and nine months ended September 30, 2011 compared to 4.35% and 4.30% for the same periods in 2010,
respectively. The Company has worked diligently to improve pricing on the loan portfolio and
interest bearing deposits during this lower rate environment. Our ability to improve pricing plus
the growth associated with our FDIC-assisted acquisitions allowed the Company to expand net
interest margin. For the third quarter of 2011, the effective yield on non-covered loans and
covered loans was 6.49% and 7.20%, respectively. For the nine months ended the effective yield on
non-covered loans and covered loans was 6.49% and 7.02%, respectively.
46
Table of Contents
Tables 1 and 2 reflect an analysis of net interest income on a fully taxable equivalent basis
for the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, as well as changes in
fully taxable equivalent net interest margin for the three-month and nine-month periods ended
September 30, 2011, compared to the same period in 2010.
Table 1: Analysis of Net Interest Income
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Interest income |
$ | 43,259 | $ | 39,062 | $ | 129,594 | $ | 108,781 | ||||||||
Fully taxable equivalent adjustment |
1,112 | 1,084 | 3,337 | 3,201 | ||||||||||||
Interest income fully taxable equivalent |
44,371 | 40,146 | 132,931 | 111,982 | ||||||||||||
Interest expense |
7,547 | 8,909 | 23,656 | 25,744 | ||||||||||||
Net interest income fully taxable equivalent |
$ | 36,824 | $ | 31,237 | $ | 109,275 | $ | 86,238 | ||||||||
Yield on earning assets fully taxable equivalent |
5.72 | % | 5.58 | % | 5.70 | % | 5.58 | % | ||||||||
Cost of interest-bearing liabilities |
1.12 | 1.45 | 1.16 | 1.56 | ||||||||||||
Net interest spread fully taxable equivalent |
4.60 | 4.13 | 4.54 | 4.02 | ||||||||||||
Net interest margin fully taxable equivalent |
4.75 | 4.35 | 4.68 | 4.30 |
Table 2: Changes in Fully Taxable Equivalent Net Interest Margin
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||
2011 vs. 2010 | 2011 v. 2010 | |||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Increase (decrease) in interest income due to change in earning assets |
$ | 1,968 | $ | 14,801 | ||||
Increase (decrease) in interest income due to change in earning asset yields |
2,257 | 6,148 | ||||||
(Increase) decrease in interest expense due to change in interest-bearing
liabilities |
(47 | ) | (2,714 | ) | ||||
(Increase) decrease in interest expense due to change in interest rates
paid on
interest-bearing liabilities |
1,409 | 4,802 | ||||||
Increase (decrease) in net interest income |
$ | 5,587 | $ | 23,037 | ||||
47
Table of Contents
Table 3 shows, for each major category of earning assets and interest-bearing
liabilities, the average amount outstanding, the interest income or expense on that amount and the
average rate earned or expensed for the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2011
and 2010. The table also shows the average rate earned on all earning assets, the average rate
expensed on all interest-bearing liabilities, the net interest spread and the net interest margin
for the same periods. The analysis is presented on a fully taxable equivalent basis. Non-accrual
loans were included in average loans for the purpose of calculating the rate earned on total loans.
Table 3: Average Balance Sheets and Net Interest Income Analysis
Three Months Ended September 30, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Average | Income / | Yield / | Average | Income / | Yield/ | |||||||||||||||||||
Balance | Expense | Rate | Balance | Expense | Rate | |||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Earnings assets |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest-bearing balances due from
banks |
$ | 147,296 | $ | 84 | 0.23 | % | $ | 177,230 | $ | 92 | 0.21 | % | ||||||||||||
Federal funds sold |
1,895 | 1 | 0.21 | 4,674 | 3 | 0.25 | ||||||||||||||||||
Investment securities taxable |
431,913 | 2,429 | 2.23 | 212,083 | 1,802 | 3.37 | ||||||||||||||||||
Investment securities non-taxable |
148,995 | 2,506 | 6.67 | 145,355 | 2,414 | 6.59 | ||||||||||||||||||
Loans receivable |
2,346,663 | 39,351 | 6.65 | 2,312,684 | 35,835 | 6.15 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total interest-earning assets |
3,076,762 | 44,371 | 5.72 | 2,852,026 | 40,146 | 5.58 | ||||||||||||||||||
Non-earning assets |
551,584 | 449,710 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Total assets |
$ | 3,628,346 | $ | 3,301,736 | ||||||||||||||||||||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Liabilities |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest-bearing liabilities |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Savings and interest-bearing
transaction accounts |
$ | 1,126,746 | $ | 1,214 | 0.43 | % | $ | 892,232 | $ | 1,388 | 0.62 | % | ||||||||||||
Time deposits |
1,288,919 | 4,424 | 1.36 | 1,211,551 | 4,931 | 1.61 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total interest-bearing deposits |
2,415,665 | 5,638 | 0.93 | 2,103,783 | 6,319 | 1.19 | ||||||||||||||||||
Federal funds purchased |
| | 0.00 | | | 0.00 | ||||||||||||||||||
Securities sold under agreement
to repurchase |
66,562 | 120 | 0.72 | 68,595 | 137 | 0.79 | ||||||||||||||||||
FHLB borrowed funds |
148,641 | 1,250 | 3.34 | 211,792 | 1,854 | 3.47 | ||||||||||||||||||
Subordinated debentures |
44,331 | 539 | 4.82 | 46,623 | 599 | 5.10 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total interest-bearing liabilities |
2,675,199 | 7,547 | 1.12 | 2,430,793 | 8,909 | 1.45 | ||||||||||||||||||
Non-interest bearing liabilities |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Non-interest bearing deposits |
464,760 | 346,105 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Other liabilities |
28,823 | 23,688 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Total liabilities |
3,168,782 | 2,800,586 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Stockholders equity |
459,564 | 501,150 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Total liabilities and
stockholders equity |
$ | 3,628,346 | $ | 3,301,736 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest spread |
4.60 | % | 4.13 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest income and margin |
$ | 36,824 | 4.75 | % | $ | 31,237 | 4.35 | % | ||||||||||||||||
48
Table of Contents
Table 3: Average Balance Sheets and Net Interest Income Analysis
Nine Months Ended September 30, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Average | Income / | Yield / | Average | Income / | Yield / | |||||||||||||||||||
Balance | Expense | Rate | Balance | Expense | Rate | |||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Earnings assets |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest-bearing balances due from
banks |
$ | 188,456 | $ | 331 | 0.23 | % | $ | 153,071 | $ | 258 | 0.23 | % | ||||||||||||
Federal funds sold |
6,735 | 9 | 0.18 | 12,835 | 13 | 0.14 | ||||||||||||||||||
Investment securities taxable |
382,011 | 6,793 | 2.38 | 207,867 | 5,364 | 3.45 | ||||||||||||||||||
Investment securities non-taxable |
150,587 | 7,480 | 6.64 | 140,301 | 7,228 | 6.89 | ||||||||||||||||||
Loans receivable |
2,392,102 | 118,318 | 6.61 | 2,167,223 | 99,119 | 6.11 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total interest-earning assets |
3,119,891 | 132,931 | 5.70 | 2,681,297 | 111,982 | 5.58 | ||||||||||||||||||
Non-earning assets |
555,009 | 358,047 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Total assets |
$ | 3,674,900 | $ | 3,039,344 | ||||||||||||||||||||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Liabilities |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest-bearing liabilities |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Savings and interest-bearing
transaction accounts |
$ | 1,120,279 | $ | 4,045 | 0.48 | % | $ | 837,181 | $ | 3,777 | 0.60 | % | ||||||||||||
Time deposits |
1,346,247 | 13,839 | 1.37 | 1,027,432 | 13,709 | 1.78 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total interest-bearing deposits |
2,466,526 | 17,884 | 0.97 | 1,864,613 | 17,486 | 1.25 | ||||||||||||||||||
Federal funds purchased |
| | 0.00 | 25 | | 0.00 | ||||||||||||||||||
Securities sold under agreement
to repurchase |
68,601 | 384 | 0.75 | 61,428 | 349 | 0.76 | ||||||||||||||||||
FHLB borrowed funds |
152,619 | 3,768 | 3.30 | 234,152 | 6,113 | 3.49 | ||||||||||||||||||
Subordinated debentures |
44,331 | 1,620 | 4.89 | 47,181 | 1,796 | 5.09 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total interest-bearing liabilities |
2,732,077 | 23,656 | 1.16 | 2,207,399 | 25,744 | 1.56 | ||||||||||||||||||
Non-interest bearing liabilities |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Non-interest bearing deposits |
437,964 | 330,238 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Other liabilities |
27,385 | 18,650 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Total liabilities |
3,197,426 | 2,556,287 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Stockholders equity |
477,474 | 483,057 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Total liabilities and
stockholders equity |
$ | 3,674,900 | $ | 3,039,344 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest spread |
4.54 | % | 4.02 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest income and margin |
$ | 109,275 | 4.68 | % | $ | 86,238 | 4.30 | % | ||||||||||||||||
49
Table of Contents
Table 4 shows changes in interest income and interest expense resulting from changes in volume
and changes in interest rates for the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2011
compared to the same period in 2010, on a fully taxable basis. The changes in interest rate and
volume have been allocated to changes in average volume and changes in average rates, in proportion
to the relationship of absolute dollar amounts of the changes in rates and volume.
Table 4: Volume/Rate Analysis
Three Months Ended September 30, | Nine Months Ended September 30, | |||||||||||||||||||||||
2011 over 2010 | 2011 over 2010 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Volume | Yield/Rate | Total | Volume | Yield/Rate | Total | |||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Increase (decrease) in: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest income: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest-bearing balances due from
banks |
$ | (17 | ) | $ | 9 | $ | (8 | ) | $ | 62 | $ | 11 | $ | 73 | ||||||||||
Federal funds sold |
(1 | ) | (1 | ) | (2 | ) | (7 | ) | 3 | (4 | ) | |||||||||||||
Investment securities taxable |
1,391 | (764 | ) | 627 | 3,475 | (2,046 | ) | 1,429 | ||||||||||||||||
Investment securities non-taxable |
61 | 31 | 92 | 517 | (265 | ) | 252 | |||||||||||||||||
Loans receivable |
534 | 2,982 | 3,516 | 10,754 | 8,445 | 19,199 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total interest income |
1,968 | 2,257 | 4,225 | 14,801 | 6,148 | 20,949 | ||||||||||||||||||
Interest expense: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest-bearing transaction and
savings deposits |
313 | (487 | ) | (174 | ) | 1,117 | (849 | ) | 268 | |||||||||||||||
Time deposits |
301 | (808 | ) | (507 | ) | 3,692 | (3,562 | ) | 130 | |||||||||||||||
Federal funds purchased |
| | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Securities sold under agreement to
repurchase |
(4 | ) | (13 | ) | (17 | ) | 40 | (5 | ) | 35 | ||||||||||||||
FHLB borrowed funds |
(534 | ) | (70 | ) | (604 | ) | (2,029 | ) | (316 | ) | (2,345 | ) | ||||||||||||
Subordinated debentures |
(29 | ) | (31 | ) | (60 | ) | (106 | ) | (70 | ) | (176 | ) | ||||||||||||
Total interest expense |
47 | (1,409 | ) | (1,362 | ) | 2,714 | (4,802 | ) | (2,088 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Increase (decrease) in net interest income |
$ | 1,921 | $ | 3,666 | $ | 5,587 | $ | 12,087 | $ | 10,950 | $ | 23,037 | ||||||||||||
Provision for Loan Losses
Our management assesses the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses by applying the
provisions of FASB ASC 310-10-35. Specific allocations are determined for loans considered to be
impaired and loss factors are assigned to the remainder of the loan portfolio to determine an
appropriate level in the allowance for loan losses. The allowance is increased, as necessary, by
making a provision for loan losses. The specific allocations for impaired loans are assigned based
on an estimated net realizable value after a thorough review of the credit relationship. The
potential loss factors associated with the remainder of the loan portfolio are based on an internal
net loss experience, as well as managements review of trends within the portfolio and related
industries.
During these tough economic times, the Company continues to follow our historical conservative
procedures for lending and evaluating the provision and allowance for loan losses. We have not
and do not participate in higher risk lending such as subprime. Our practice continues to be
primarily traditional real estate lending with strong loan-to-value ratios. While there have been
declines in our collateral value, particularly Florida, these declines have been addressed in our
assessment of the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses.
50
Table of Contents
Generally, commercial, commercial real estate, and residential real estate loans are assigned
a level of risk at origination. Thereafter, these loans are reviewed on a regular basis. The
periodic reviews generally include loan payment and collateral status, the borrowers financial
data, and key ratios such as cash flows, operating income, liquidity, and leverage. A material
change in the borrowers credit analysis can result in an increase or decrease in the loans
assigned risk grade. Aggregate dollar volume by risk grade is monitored on an on-going basis.
Our management reviews certain key loan quality indicators on a monthly basis, including
current economic conditions, delinquency trends and ratios, portfolio mix changes, and other
information management deems necessary. This review process provides a degree of objective
measurement that is used in conjunction with periodic internal evaluations. To the extent that this
review process yields differences between estimated and actual observed losses, adjustments are
made to the loss factors used to determine the appropriate level of the allowance for loan losses.
Our Company is primarily a real estate lender in Arkansas and Florida. As such we are subject
to declines in asset quality when real estate prices fall during a recession. The recent recession
has harshly impacted the real estate market in Florida. During 2008, many real estate values
declined in the 20 plus percent range in Florida. The Florida real estate prices have continued to
decline but the rate of decline has slowed down. The Arkansas economy in our markets has been
stable over the past several years with no boom or bust. As a result, the Arkansas economy has
fared much better with only low single digit declines in real estate values annually since 2008.
During the first quarter of 2008, we began to experience a decline in our asset quality,
particularly in the Florida market. In 2008, non-performing non-covered loans started the year at
$3.3 million but ended each year at $29.9 million, $39.9 million and $49.5 million for 2008, 2009
and 2010, respectively. As of September 30, 2011, non-performing non-covered loans has improved
downward to $27.9 million.
The provision for loan losses represents managements determination of the amount necessary to
be charged against the current periods earnings, to maintain the allowance for loan losses at a
level that is considered adequate in relation to the estimated risk inherent in the loan portfolio.
No provision was recorded for the three-month period ended September 30, 2011, compared to $3.0
million recorded during the same period in 2010. Our provision for loan losses decreased $8.6
million, or 87.3% to $1.3 million for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2011, from $9.9
million for the same period in 2010. The net loans charged off for the three-month period ended
September 30, 2011 were $2.3 million compared to net loans charged off of $2.8 million for the same
period in 2010. The net loans charged-off for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2011 were
$90,000 compared to $9.0 million for the same period in 2010. The decreased provision for loan
loss during the third quarter is a result of the decline in net charge-offs for the three-month
period ended September 30, 2011 plus improved asset quality for the third quarter of 2011. The
decreased provision for loan loss for 2011 is a result of the Company being in a low net charge off
position for the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2011 versus a greater net charge-off
position during 2010 plus improving asset quality for 2011. The net charge-offs were approximately
$708,000 for Arkansas and approximately $1.6 million for Florida for the three-months ended
September 30, 2011. The net recoveries were approximately $2.7 million for Arkansas and net
charge-offs were approximately $2.7 million for Florida for the nine-months ended September 30,
2011.
Non-Interest Income
Total non-interest income was $10.0 million and $29.1 million for the three-month and
nine-month periods ended September 30, 2011 compared to $8.3 million and $33.2 million for the same
periods in 2010, respectively. Excluding the gain on acquisitions during the first nine months of
2010, non-interest income was $23.8 million for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2010. Our
recurring non-interest income includes service charges on deposit accounts, other service charges
and fees, mortgage lending, insurance, title fees, increase in cash value of life insurance,
dividends and FDIC indemnification accretion.
51
Table of Contents
Table 5 measures the various components of our non-interest income for the three-month and
nine-month periods ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, as well as changes for the
three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2011 compared to the same period in 2010.
Table 5: Non-Interest Income
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
September 30, | 2011 Change | September 30, | 2011 Change | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | from 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | from 2010 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Service charges on deposit accounts |
$ | 3,638 | $ | 3,551 | $ | 87 | 2.5 | % | $ | 10,428 | $ | 10,275 | $ | 153 | 1.5 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Other service charges and fees |
2,489 | 1,816 | 673 | 37.1 | 7,375 | 5,353 | 2,022 | 37.8 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage lending income |
783 | 760 | 23 | 3.0 | 2,089 | 1,822 | 267 | 14.7 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage servicing income |
| | | 0.0 | | 314 | (314 | ) | (100.0 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Insurance commissions |
428 | 248 | 180 | 72.6 | 1,505 | 904 | 601 | 66.5 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Income from title services |
126 | 98 | 28 | 28.6 | 327 | 353 | (26 | ) | (7.4 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Increase in cash value of life insurance |
323 | 330 | (7 | ) | (2.1 | ) | 849 | 1,106 | (257 | ) | (23.2 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Dividends from FHLB, FRB &
bankers bank |
184 | 151 | 33 | 21.9 | 506 | 419 | 87 | 20.8 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gain on acquisitions |
| | | 0.0 | | 9,334 | (9,334 | ) | (100.0 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Gain on sale of SBA loans |
| | | 0.0 | 259 | 18 | 241 | 1,338.9 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gain (loss) on sale of premises
and equipment, net |
6 | 2 | 4 | 200.0 | 79 | 221 | (142 | ) | (64.3 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Gain (loss) on OREO, net |
69 | (1,063 | ) | 1,132 | (106.5 | ) | (1,032 | ) | (1,308 | ) | 276 | (21.1 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Gain (loss) on securities, net |
5 | (37 | ) | 42 | (113.5 | ) | 5 | (37 | ) | 42 | (113.5 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
FDIC indemnification accretion |
1,314 | 1,895 | (581 | ) | (30.7 | ) | 4,614 | 2,631 | 1,983 | 75.4 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Other income |
595 | 556 | 39 | 7.0 | 2,123 | 1,767 | 356 | 20.1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total non-interest income |
$ | 9,960 | $ | 8,307 | $ | 1,653 | 19.9 | % | $ | 29,127 | $ | 33,172 | $ | (4,045 | ) | (12.2 | )% | |||||||||||||||
Non-interest income increased $1.7 million, or 19.9%, to $10.0 million for the three-month
period ended September 30, 2011 from $8.3 million for the same period in 2010. The primary factors
that resulted in this increase are new income from additional service charges and fees associated
with growth from our FDIC-assisted acquisitions and gain on sale of OREO in the third quarter of
2011 when compared to the OREO loss in the third quarter of 2010 offset by the expected reduction
in income from FDIC indemnification accretion.
Non-interest income excluding gains on acquisitions increased $5.3 million, or 22.2%, to $29.1
million for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2011 from $23.8 million for the same period
in 2010. The primary factors that resulted in this increase are new income from FDIC
indemnification accretion and additional service charges and fees associated with growth from our
FDIC-assisted acquisitions. Included in other income is a first quarter 2011 $308,000 gain from
life insurance proceeds of a former bank director.
Because the FDIC will reimburse us for certain acquired loans should we experience a loss, an
indemnification asset was recorded at fair value at the acquisition date. The difference between
the fair value recorded at the acquisition date and the gross reimbursements expected to be
received from the FDIC are accreted into income over the life of the indemnification asset using an
appropriate discount rate, which reflects counterparty credit risk and other uncertainties.
Because of this time value of money type accretion, the accretion amounts are expected to be higher
in initial periods and decline during future periods.
Non-Interest Expense
Non-interest expense consists of salaries and employee benefits, occupancy and equipment, data
processing, and other expenses such as advertising, amortization of intangibles, amortization of
mortgage servicing rights, electronic banking expense, FDIC and state assessment, mortgage
servicing and legal and accounting fees.
52
Table of Contents
Table 6 below sets forth a summary of non-interest expense for the three-month and nine-month
periods ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, as well as changes for the three-month and nine-month
periods ended September 30, 2011 compared to the same period in 2010.
Table 6: Non-Interest Expense
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
September 30, | 2011 Change | September 30, | 2011 Change | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | from 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | from 2010 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Salaries and employee benefits |
$ | 10,691 | $ | 9,637 | $ | 1,054 | 10.9 | % | $ | 32,449 | $ | 27,251 | $ | 5,198 | 19.1 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Occupancy and equipment |
3,562 | 3,264 | 298 | 9.1 | 10,923 | 9,036 | 1,887 | 20.9 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Data processing expense |
1,185 | 848 | 337 | 39.7 | 3,607 | 2,664 | 943 | 35.4 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other operating expenses: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Advertising |
1,033 | 532 | 501 | 94.2 | 3,046 | 1,351 | 1,695 | 125.5 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Merger and acquisition expenses |
| 1,653 | (1,653 | ) | (100.0 | ) | 11 | 2,970 | (2,959 | ) | (99.6 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Amortization of intangibles |
705 | 674 | 31 | 4.6 | 2,122 | 1,736 | 386 | 22.2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amortization of mortgage
servicing rights |
| | | 0.0 | | 436 | (436 | ) | (100.0 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Electronic banking expense |
682 | 495 | 187 | 37.8 | 2,038 | 1,468 | 570 | 38.8 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Directors fees |
230 | 176 | 54 | 30.7 | 594 | 502 | 92 | 18.3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Due from bank service charges |
119 | 142 | (23 | ) | (16.2 | ) | 378 | 335 | 43 | 12.8 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
FDIC and state assessment |
1,062 | 908 | 154 | 17.0 | 3,213 | 2,792 | 421 | 15.1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Insurance |
447 | 309 | 138 | 44.7 | 1,226 | 905 | 321 | 35.5 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Legal and accounting |
367 | 426 | (59 | ) | (13.8 | ) | 1,276 | 1,170 | 106 | 9.1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage servicing expense |
| 4 | (4 | ) | (100.0 | ) | | 164 | (164 | ) | (100.0 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Other professional fees |
522 | 385 | 137 | 35.6 | 1,504 | 1,066 | 438 | 41.1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating supplies |
260 | 226 | 34 | 15.0 | 871 | 619 | 252 | 40.7 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Postage |
243 | 167 | 76 | 45.5 | 730 | 481 | 249 | 51.8 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Telephone |
234 | 240 | (6 | ) | (2.5 | ) | 756 | 530 | 226 | 42.6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Other expense |
2,394 | 1,208 | 1,186 | 98.2 | 6,709 | 3,363 | 3,346 | 99.5 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total non-interest expense |
$ | 23,736 | $ | 21,294 | $ | 2,442 | 11.5 | % | $ | 71,453 | $ | 58,839 | $ | 12,614 | 21.4 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Non-interest expense increased $2.4 million, or 11.5%, to $23.7 million for the three-month
period ended September 30, 2011, from $21.3 million for the same period in 2010. Non-interest
expense increased $12.6 million, or 21.4%, to $71.5 million for the nine-month period ended
September 30, 2011, from $58.8 million for the same period in 2010. Excluding the merger and
acquisition expenses, non-interest expense increased $15.6 million or 27.9%. This increase is
primarily the result of the additional operating costs associated with the branch locations
acquired from the FDIC-assisted transactions in during 2010 and the normal increase in cost of
doing business. We acquired 37 branch locations since we began acquiring FDIC-assisted bank in
March of 2010 closing one in 2010 and eight during the first nine months of 2011.
Income Taxes
The provision for income taxes increased $3.0 million, or 65.5%, to $7.6 million for the
three-month period ended September 30, 2011, from $4.6 million as of September 30, 2010. The
provision for income taxes increased $5.7 million, or 35.1%, to $21.8 million for the nine-month
period ended September 30, 2011, from $16.1 million as of September 30, 2010. The effective income
tax rate was 34.8% and 34.9% for the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2011,
compared to 32.5% and 33.9% for the same periods in 2010. The primary cause of this increase is
the result of our higher earnings at our marginal tax rate of 39.225%.
53
Table of Contents
Financial Condition as of and for the Period Ended September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010
Our total assets as of September 30, 2011 decreased $140.5 million, an annualized reduction of
5.0%, to $3.62 billion from the $3.76 billion reported as of December 31, 2010. Our loan portfolio
not covered by loss share decreased by $66.0 million, an annualized reduction of 4.7%, to $1.83
billion as of September 30, 2011, from $1.89 billion as of December 31, 2010. Our loan portfolio
covered by loss share decreased by $64.5 million, an annualized reduction of 15.0%, to $511.3
million as of September 30, 2011, from $575.8 million as of December 31, 2010. Stockholders
equity decreased $13.8 million to $463.1 million as of September 30, 2011, compared to $476.9
million as of December 31, 2010. Common stockholders equity was $463.1 million at September 30,
2011 compared to $427.5 million at December 31, 2010, an increase of $35.7 million. The decrease in
assets is primarily associated with historically low loan demand and payoffs in our non-covered and
covered loan portfolios. The decrease in stockholders equity is primarily associated with the
Company repaying the TARP funds during the third quarter of 2011 offset by the $49.1 million of
comprehensive income less the $6.6 million of dividends paid for 2011 and the $5.5 million used to
repurchase 250,000 shares of common stock. The annualized decline in stockholders equity for the
first nine months of 2011 was 3.9%.
Loans Receivable Not Covered by Loss Share
Our non-covered loan portfolio averaged $1.81 billion and $1.84 billion during the three-month
and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2011. Non-covered loans were $1.83 billion as of
September 30, 2011, compared to $1.89 billion as of December 31, 2010, an annualized decrease of
4.7%. The slowdown in loan growth from our historical expansion rates was not unexpected. Our
customers have grown more cautious in this weaker economy.
The most significant components of the non-covered loan portfolio were commercial real estate,
residential real estate, consumer, and commercial and industrial loans. These non-covered loans are
primarily originated within our market areas of central Arkansas, north central Arkansas, southern
Arkansas, the Florida Keys and southwest Florida, and are generally secured by residential or
commercial real estate or business or personal property within our market areas. We have only made
a limited amount of new loan originations within our central Florida and the Florida Panhandle
markets entered into in 2010 as a result of our FDIC-assisted acquisitions. However, we did
acquire $23.3 million of non-covered loans located in the Florida Panhandle market during our 2010
FDIC acquisitions.
Certain credit markets have experienced difficult conditions and volatility during 2009, 2010
and the first nine months of 2011, particularly Florida. The Florida market currently is
approximately 87.9% secured by real estate and 16.8% of our loan portfolio not covered by loss
share.
54
Table of Contents
Table 7 presents our loan balances not covered by loss share by category as of the dates
indicated.
Table 7: Loan Portfolio Not Covered by Loss Share
As of | As of | |||||||
September 30, 2011 | December 31, 2010 | |||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Real estate: |
||||||||
Commercial real estate loans: |
||||||||
Non-farm/non-residential |
$ | 744,749 | $ | 805,635 | ||||
Construction/land development |
366,926 | 348,768 | ||||||
Agricultural |
26,683 | 26,798 | ||||||
Residential real estate loans: |
||||||||
Residential 1-4 family |
353,110 | 371,381 | ||||||
Multifamily residential |
59,974 | 59,319 | ||||||
Total real estate |
1,551,442 | 1,611,901 | ||||||
Consumer |
40,225 | 51,642 | ||||||
Commercial and industrial |
170,695 | 184,014 | ||||||
Agricultural |
35,238 | 16,549 | ||||||
Other |
28,773 | 28,268 | ||||||
Loans receivable not covered by loss share |
$ | 1,826,373 | $ | 1,892,374 | ||||
Non-Covered Commercial Real Estate Loans. We originate non-farm and non-residential loans
(primarily secured by commercial real estate), construction/land development loans, and
agricultural loans, which are generally secured by real estate located in our market areas. Our
commercial mortgage loans are generally collateralized by first liens on real estate and amortized
over a 15 to 25 year period with balloon payments due at the end of one to five years. These loans
are generally underwritten by assessing cash flow (debt service coverage), primary and secondary
source of repayment, the financial strength of any guarantor, the strength of the tenant (if any),
the borrowers liquidity and leverage, management experience, ownership structure, economic
conditions and industry specific trends and collateral. Generally, we will loan up to 85% of the
value of improved property, 65% of the value of raw land and 75% of the value of land to be
acquired and developed. A first lien on the property and assignment of lease is required if the
collateral is rental property, with second lien positions considered on a case-by-case basis.
As of September 30, 2011, non-covered commercial real estate loans totaled $1.14 billion, or
62.3% of our non-covered loan portfolio, compared to $1.18 billion, or 62.4% of our non-covered
loan portfolio, as of December 31, 2010. This decrease is primarily related to normal loan pay
downs combined with limited loan demand. Florida non-covered commercial real estate loans are
approximately 10.1% of our non-covered loan portfolio.
Non-Covered Residential Real Estate Loans. We originate one to four family, owner occupied
residential mortgage loans generally secured by property located in our primary market area. The
majority of our non-covered residential mortgage loans consist of loans secured by owner occupied,
single family residences. Non-covered residential real estate loans generally have a loan-to-value
ratio of up to 90%. These loans are underwritten by giving consideration to the borrowers ability
to pay, stability of employment or source of income, debt-to-income ratio, credit history and
loan-to-value ratio.
As of September 30, 2011, non-covered residential real estate loans totaled $413.1 million, or
22.6% of our non-covered loan portfolio, compared to $430.7 million, or 22.8% of our non-covered
loan portfolio, as of December 31, 2010. This decrease is primarily related to normal loan pay
downs combined with limited loan demand. Florida non-covered residential real estate loans are
approximately 4.6% of our non-covered loan portfolio.
Non-Covered Consumer Loans. Our non-covered consumer loan portfolio is composed of secured
and unsecured loans originated by our banks. The performance of consumer loans will be affected by
the local and regional economy as well as the rates of personal bankruptcies, job loss, divorce and
other individual-specific characteristics.
55
Table of Contents
As of September 30, 2011, our non-covered installment consumer loan portfolio totaled $40.2
million, or 2.2% of our total non-covered loan portfolio, compared to the $51.6 million, or 2.7% of
our non-covered loan portfolio as of December 31, 2010. This decrease is associated with normal
payoffs and pay downs combined with limited loan demand. Florida non-covered consumer loans are
approximately 1.1% of our non-covered loan portfolio.
Non-Covered Commercial and Industrial Loans. Commercial and industrial loans are made for a
variety of business purposes, including working capital, inventory, equipment and capital
expansion. The terms for commercial loans are generally one to seven years. Commercial loan
applications must be supported by current financial information on the borrower and, where
appropriate, by adequate collateral. Commercial loans are generally underwritten by addressing cash
flow (debt service coverage), primary and secondary sources of repayment, the financial strength of
any guarantor, the borrowers liquidity and leverage, management experience, ownership structure,
economic conditions and industry specific trends and collateral. The loan to value ratio depends on
the type of collateral. Generally speaking, accounts receivable are financed at between 50% and 80%
of accounts receivable less than 60 days past due. Inventory financing will range between 50% and
60% (with no work in process) depending on the borrower and nature of inventory. We require a first
lien position for those loans.
As of September 30, 2011, non-covered commercial and industrial loans outstanding totaled
$170.7 million, or 9.3% of our non-covered loan portfolio, compared to $184.0 million, or 9.7% of
our non-covered loan portfolio, as of December 31, 2010. This decrease is primarily related to
normal loan pay downs combined with limited loan demand. Florida non-covered commercial and
industrial loans are approximately 0.63% of our non-covered loan portfolio.
Total Loans Receivable
Table 8: Total Loans Receivable
As of September 30, 2011
As of September 30, 2011
Loans | Loans | |||||||||||
Receivable | Receivable | Total | ||||||||||
Not Covered by | Covered by FDIC | Loans | ||||||||||
Loss Share | Loss Share | Receivable | ||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||
Real estate: |
||||||||||||
Commercial real estate loans |
||||||||||||
Non-farm/non-residential |
$ | 744,749 | $ | 189,558 | $ | 934,307 | ||||||
Construction/land development |
366,926 | 117,143 | 484,069 | |||||||||
Agricultural |
26,683 | 3,413 | 30,096 | |||||||||
Residential real estate loans |
||||||||||||
Residential 1-4 family |
353,110 | 158,701 | 511,811 | |||||||||
Multifamily residential |
59,974 | 9,010 | 68,984 | |||||||||
Total real estate |
1,551,442 | 477,825 | 2,029,267 | |||||||||
Consumer |
40,225 | 454 | 40,679 | |||||||||
Commercial and industrial |
170,695 | 32,183 | 202,878 | |||||||||
Agricultural |
35,238 | | 35,238 | |||||||||
Other |
28,773 | 864 | 29,637 | |||||||||
Total |
$ | 1,826,373 | $ | 511,326 | $ | 2,337,699 | ||||||
56
Table of Contents
Non-Performing Assets Not Covered by Loss Share
We classify our non-covered problem loans into three categories: past due loans, special
mention loans and classified loans (accruing and non-accruing).
When management determines that a loan is no longer performing, and that collection of
interest appears doubtful, the loan is placed on non-accrual status. Loans that are 90 days past
due are placed on non-accrual status unless they are adequately secured and there is reasonable
assurance of full collection of both principal and interest. Our management closely monitors all
loans that are contractually 90 days past due, treated as special mention or otherwise classified
or on non-accrual status.
Table 9 sets forth information with respect to our non-performing non-covered assets as of
September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010. As of these dates, all non-performing non-covered
restructured loans are included in non-accrual non-covered loans.
Table 9: Non-performing Assets Not Covered by Loss Share
As of | As of | |||||||
September 30, | December 31, | |||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||
Non-accrual non-covered loans |
$ | 25,373 | $ | 48,924 | ||||
Non-covered loans past due 90 days or more (principal or
interest payments) |
2,481 | 578 | ||||||
Total non-performing non-covered loans |
27,854 | 49,502 | ||||||
Other non-performing non-covered assets |
||||||||
Non-covered foreclosed assets held for sale, net |
16,541 | 11,626 | ||||||
Other non-performing non-covered assets |
222 | 77 | ||||||
Total other non-performing non-covered assets |
16,763 | 11,703 | ||||||
Total non-performing non-covered assets |
$ | 44,617 | $ | 61,205 | ||||
Allowance for loan losses to non-performing non-covered loans |
195.69 | % | 107.77 | % | ||||
Non-performing non-covered loans to total non-covered loans |
1.53 | 2.62 | ||||||
Non-performing non-covered assets to total non-covered assets |
1.55 | 2.08 |
Our non-performing non-covered loans are comprised of non-accrual non-covered loans and
accruing non-covered loans that are contractually past due 90 days. Our bank subsidiary recognizes
income principally on the accrual basis of accounting. When loans are classified as non-accrual,
the accrued interest is charged off and no further interest is accrued, unless the credit
characteristics of the loan improve. If a loan is determined by management to be uncollectible, the
portion of the loan determined to be uncollectible is then charged to the allowance for loan
losses. The Florida franchise contains approximately 69.1% and 52.7% of our non-performing
non-covered loans as of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively.
Total non-performing non-covered loans improved to $27.9 million as of September 30, 2011,
compared to the $49.5 million as of December 31, 2010. As of September 30, 2011 and December 31,
2010, non-performing non-covered loans are $19.2 million and $26.1 million in the Florida market,
respectively.
During the first quarter we reached the end of the high season in the Florida Keys, and it was
the best season in recent history in terms of tourism. As a result, we had several Keys credits
that performed in a manner that we were able to return them onto an accruing basis in the first
quarter, and this reduced our non-performing loans. In addition, through the completion of the
legal process, we moved two Arkansas relationships in the first quarter from non-performing to
non-covered foreclosed assets held for sale. The positive reduction of non-performing non-covered
loans in the first quarter was $16.0 million. We have continued to experience improvement in
non-performing loans and non-performing assets in the second and third quarters of 2011.
57
Table of Contents
While we believe our allowance for loan losses is adequate at September 30, 2011, as
additional facts become known about relevant internal and external factors that affect loan
collectability and our assumptions, it may result in us making additions to the provision for loan
losses during the fourth quarter of 2011 or during 2012.
Restructuring of a debt constitutes a troubled debt restructuring (TDR) if the Company, for
economic or legal reasons related to the debtors financial difficulties, grants a concession to
the debtor that it would not otherwise consider. Common concessions granted to borrowers include
interest rate and/or term modifications. As a result, the Bank will work with the borrower to
prevent further difficulties, and ultimately to improve the likelihood of recovery on the loan.
A loan modification does not result in a TDR unless the borrower is in financial difficulty
and a concession has been granted. In determining whether a concession has been granted, the
Company takes into account the extent to which the nature and amount of any additional collateral
or guarantees received as part of the modifications do not serve as adequate compensation for other
terms of the restructuring. If the additional collateral or guarantees received adequately
compensate the Company for the concessions granted, the loan is not classified as a TDR.
In this current real estate crisis that the nation in general and Florida in particular has
been experiencing, it has become more common to restructure or modify the terms of certain loans
under certain conditions. In those circumstances it may be beneficial to restructure the terms of a
loan and work with the borrower for the benefit of both parties, versus forcing the property into
foreclosure and having to dispose of it in an unfavorable and depressed real estate market. Only
non-performing restructured loans are included in our non-performing non-covered loans. As of
September 30, 2011, we had $51.4 million of non-covered restructured loans that are in compliance
with the modified terms and are not reported as past due or non-accrual in Table 9. Our Florida
market contains $29.7 million of these non-covered restructured loans.
To facilitate this process, a loan modification that might not otherwise be considered may be
granted resulting in classification as a troubled debt restructuring. These loans can involve loans
remaining on non-accrual, moving to non-accrual, or continuing on an accrual status, depending on
the individual facts and circumstances of the borrower. Generally, a non-accrual loan that is
restructured remains on non-accrual for a period of six months to demonstrate that the borrower can
meet the restructured terms. However, performance prior to the restructuring, or significant events
that coincide with the restructuring, are considered in assessing whether the borrower can pay the
new terms and may result in the loan being returned to an accrual status after a shorter
performance period. If the borrowers ability to meet the revised payment schedule is not
reasonably assured, the loan will remain in a nonaccrual status.
The majority of the Banks loan modifications relate to commercial lending and involve
reducing the interest rate, changing from a principal and interest payment to interest-only, a
lengthening of the amortization period, or a combination of some or all of the three. In addition,
it is common for the Bank to seek additional collateral or guarantor support when modifying a loan.
The Bank continues to work with borrowers who are experiencing financial difficulties, 91.2% and
82.2% of all restructured loans are performing to the terms of the restructure as of September 30,
2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively.
Total foreclosed assets held for sale not covered by loss share were $16.5 million as of
September 30, 2011, compared to $11.6 million as of December 31, 2010, for an increase of $4.9
million. The foreclosed assets held for sale not covered by loss share are comprised of $4.9
million of assets located in Florida with the remaining $11.6 million of assets located in
Arkansas. During 2011, we have only had three large foreclosed properties greater than $1.0
million. We had one large foreclosed housing development loan in the Florida Keys, one large
multi-family property in central Arkansas and currently have one large development loan in
northwest Arkansas in foreclosure.
During April 2011, we sold the large foreclosed housing development in the Florida Keys. The
carrying value of this non-covered property was $4.0 million, and it sold for $2.8 million
resulting in a $1.2 million loss for the second quarter of 2011.
58
Table of Contents
During September 2011, we sold the large multi-family property in central Arkansas that was
placed in foreclosed assets during the second quarter of 2011. The carrying value of this
non-covered property was $3.7 million, and it sold for $5.7 million. Because this property was
settled within 90 days of foreclosure, the $2.0 million difference is reflected as a recovery in
the allowance for loan losses.
The large development loan in northwest Arkansas was moved into foreclosed assets during the
first quarter of 2011. The carrying value of this non-covered foreclosed property is $3.6 million.
The losses on these loans were addressed during the fourth quarter of 2010. No additional
charge-offs were needed when these loans were moved into foreclosed assets during 2011. The
Company does not currently anticipate any additional losses on these properties. No other
foreclosed assets held for sale not covered by loss share have a carrying value greater than $1.0
million.
At September 30, 2011, total foreclosed assets held for sale were $48.7 million. Table 10
shows the summary of foreclosed assets held for sale as of September 30, 2011.
Table 10: Total Foreclosed Assets Held For Sale
September 30, 2011 | ||||||||||||
Not Covered by | Covered by FDIC | |||||||||||
Loss Share | Loss Share | Total | ||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||
Commercial real estate loans |
||||||||||||
Non-farm/non-residential |
$ | 7,779 | $ | 8,258 | $ | 16,037 | ||||||
Construction/land development |
5,631 | 13,914 | 19,545 | |||||||||
Agriculture |
| 599 | 599 | |||||||||
Residential real estate loans |
||||||||||||
Residential 1-4 family |
3,131 | 9,412 | 12,543 | |||||||||
Multifamily residential |
| | | |||||||||
Total |
$ | 16,541 | $ | 32,183 | $ | 48,724 | ||||||
If the non-accrual non-covered loans had been accruing interest in accordance with the
original terms of their respective agreements, interest income of approximately $462,000 and
$616,000 for the three-month periods ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively and $1.8
million for both the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively would have
been recorded. The interest income recognized on the non-covered non-accrual loans for the
three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 was considered immaterial.
A loan is considered impaired when it is probable that we will not receive all amounts due
according to the contracted terms of the loans. Impaired loans may include non-performing loans
(loans past due 90 days or more and non-accrual loans) and certain other loans identified by
management that are still performing. Additionally, all TDRs are considered impaired loans. As of
September 30, 2011, average non-covered impaired loans were $105.3 million compared to $54.5
million as of September 30, 2010. As of September 30, 2011, non-covered impaired loans were $118.4
million, compared to $92.3 million as of December 31, 2010, for an increase of $26.1 million. This
increase is the result of the underlying value of collateral on non-covered loans continuing to
deteriorate in the current unfavorable economic conditions, particularly in the fourth quarter of
2010. As of September 30, 2011, our Florida market accounted for $52.7 million of the non-covered
impaired loans.
59
Table of Contents
We evaluated loans purchased in conjunction with the acquisitions of Old Southern, Key West
and Coastal-Bayside, Wakulla and Gulf State for impairment in accordance with the provisions of
FASB ASC Topic 310-30, Loans and Debt Securities Acquired with Deteriorated Credit Quality.
Purchased covered loans are considered impaired if there is evidence of credit deterioration since
origination and if it is probable that not all contractually required payments will be collected.
All loans acquired in these six transactions were deemed to be covered impaired loans. These loans
were not classified as nonperforming assets at September 30, 2011, as the loans are accounted for
on a pooled basis and the pools are considered to be performing. Therefore, interest income,
through accretion of the difference between the carrying amount of the loans and the expected cash
flows, is being recognized on all purchased impaired loans.
Non-performing loans and impaired loans are defined differently. Some loans may be included
in both categories.
Past Due and Non-Accrual Loans
Table 11 shows the summary non-accrual loans as of September 30, 2011:
Table 11: Total Non-Accrual Loans
September 30, 2011 | ||||||||||||
Not | ||||||||||||
Covered by | Covered by FDIC | |||||||||||
Loss Share | Loss Share | Total | ||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||
Non-accrual loans |
||||||||||||
Commercial real estate loans |
||||||||||||
Non-farm/non-residential |
$ | 5,028 | $ | | $ | 5,028 | ||||||
Construction/land development |
1,702 | | 1,702 | |||||||||
Agricultural |
939 | | 939 | |||||||||
Residential real estate loans |
||||||||||||
Residential 1-4 family |
14,033 | | 14,033 | |||||||||
Multifamily residential |
| | | |||||||||
Total real estate |
21,702 | | 21,702 | |||||||||
Consumer |
1,823 | | 1,823 | |||||||||
Commercial and industrial |
1,808 | | 1,808 | |||||||||
Agricultural |
| | | |||||||||
Other |
40 | | 40 | |||||||||
Total non-accrual loans |
$ | 25,373 | $ | | $ | 25,373 | ||||||
Table 12 shows the summary of accruing past due loans 90 days or more as of September 30,
2011:
60
Table of Contents
Table 12: Total Loans Accruing Past Due 90 Days or More
September 30, 2011 | ||||||||||||
Not | ||||||||||||
Covered by | Covered by FDIC | |||||||||||
Loss Share | Loss Share | Total | ||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||
Non-accrual loans |
||||||||||||
Commercial real estate loans |
||||||||||||
Non-farm/non-residential |
$ | | $ | 30,894 | $ | 30,894 | ||||||
Construction/land development |
50 | 48,823 | 48,873 | |||||||||
Agricultural |
| 335 | 335 | |||||||||
Residential real estate loans |
||||||||||||
Residential 1-4 family |
277 | 37,618 | 37,895 | |||||||||
Multifamily residential |
| | | |||||||||
Total real estate |
327 | 117,670 | 117,997 | |||||||||
Consumer |
105 | 232 | 337 | |||||||||
Commercial and industrial |
| 5,942 | 5,942 | |||||||||
Agricultural |
| | | |||||||||
Other |
2,049 | 30 | 2,079 | |||||||||
Total loans past due 90 days or more |
$ | 2,481 | $ | 123,874 | $ | 126,355 | ||||||
The Companys total past due and non-accrual covered loans to total covered loans was 24.2% as
of September 30, 2011.
Allowance for Loan Losses
Overview. The allowance for loan losses is maintained at a level which our management
believes is adequate to absorb all probable losses on loans in the loan portfolio. The amount of
the allowance is affected by: (i) loan charge-offs, which decrease the allowance; (ii) recoveries
on loans previously charged off, which increase the allowance; and (iii) the provision of possible
loan losses charged to income, which increases the allowance. In determining the provision for
possible loan losses, it is necessary for our management to monitor fluctuations in the allowance
resulting from actual charge-offs and recoveries and to periodically review the size and
composition of the loan portfolio in light of current and anticipated economic conditions. If
actual losses exceed the amount of allowance for loan losses, our earnings could be adversely
affected.
As we evaluate the allowance for loan losses, we categorize it as follows: (i) specific
allocations; (ii) allocations for classified assets with no specific allocation; (iii) general
allocations for each major loan category; and (iv) miscellaneous allocations.
Specific Allocations. As a general rule, if a specific allocation is warranted, it is the
result of an analysis of a previously classified credit or relationship. Typically, when it becomes
evident through the payment history or a financial statement review that a loan or relationship is
no longer supported by the cash flows of the asset and/or borrower and has become collateral
dependent, we will use appraisals or other collateral analysis to determine if collateral
impairment has occurred. The amount or likelihood of loss on this credit may not yet be evident, so
a charge-off would not be prudent. However, if the analysis indicates that an impairment has
occurred, then a specific allocation will be determined for this loan. If our existing appraisal is
outdated or the collateral has been subject to significant market changes, we will obtain a new
appraisal for this impairment analysis. The majority of the Companys impaired loans are collateral
dependent at the present time, so third-party appraisals were used to determine the necessary
impairment for these loans. Cash flow available to service debt was used for the other impaired
loans. This analysis is performed each quarter in connection with the preparation of the analysis
of the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses, and if necessary, adjustments are made to the
specific allocation provided for a particular loan.
61
Table of Contents
For collateral dependent loans, we do not consider an appraisal outdated simply due to the
passage of time. However, if market or other conditions have deteriorated and we believe that the
current market value of the property is not within approximately 20% of the appraised value, we
will consider the appraisal outdated and order a new appraisal for the impairment analysis. The
recognition of any provision or related charge-off on a collateral dependent loan is either through
annual credit analysis or, many times, when the relationship becomes delinquent. If the borrower is
not current, we will update our credit and cash flow analysis to determine the borrowers repayment
ability. If we determine this ability does not exist and it appears that the collection of the
entire principal and interest is not likely, then the loan could be placed on non-accrual status.
In any case, loans are classified as non-accrual no later than 105 days past due. If the loan
requires a quarterly impairment analysis, this analysis is completed in conjunction with the
completion of the analysis of the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses. Any exposure
identified through the impairment analysis is shown as a specific reserve on the individual
impairment. If it is determined that a new appraisal is required, it is ordered and will be taken
into consideration during the next completion of the impairment analysis.
Between the receipt of the original appraisal and the updated appraisal, we monitor the loans
repayment history and subject the loan to examination by our internal loan review. If the loan is
over $1.0 million, our policy requires an annual credit review. In addition, we update all
financial information and calculate the global repayment ability of the borrower/guarantors.
In estimating the net realizable value of the collateral, management may deem it appropriate
to discount the appraisal based on the applicable circumstances. In such case, the amount charged
off may result in loan principal outstanding being below fair value as presented in the appraisal.
As a general rule, when it becomes evident that the full principal and accrued interest of a
loan may not be collected, or by law at 105 days past due, we will reflect that loan as
nonperforming. It will remain nonperforming until it performs in a manner that it is reasonable to
expect that we will collect the full principal and accrued interest.
When the amount or likelihood of a loss on a loan has been determined, a charge-off should be
taken in the period it is determined. If a partial charge-off occurs, the quarterly impairment
analysis will determine if the loan is still impaired, and thus continues to require a specific
allocation.
Allocations for Criticized and Classified Assets not Individually Evaluated for Impairment.
We establish allocations for loans rated special mention through loss in accordance with the
guidelines established by the regulatory agencies. A percentage rate is applied to each loan
category to determine the level of dollar allocation.
General Allocations. We establish general allocations for each major loan category. This
section also includes allocations to loans, which are collectively evaluated for loss such as
residential real estate, commercial real estate, consumer loans and commercial and industrial
loans. The allocations in this section are based on a historical review of loan loss experience and
past due accounts. We give consideration to trends, changes in loan mix, delinquencies, prior
losses, and other related information.
Miscellaneous Allocations. Allowance allocations other than specific, classified, and general
are included in our miscellaneous section.
Charge-offs and Recoveries. Total charge-offs increased to $6.4 million for the three months
ended September 30, 2011, compared to $3.0 million for the same period in 2010. Total charge-offs
decreased to $9.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011, compared to $10.8 million
for the same period in 2010.
The third quarter of 2011 charge-offs primarily represent loans which had already been fully
reserved with specific reserve allocations. More specifically, in the third quarter we charged off
approximately $5.3 million on loans that were eligible for a specific reserve and the allocation on
those loans totaled approximately $7.0 million.
62
Table of Contents
Total recoveries increased to $4.1 million for the three months ended September 30, 2011,
compared to $217,000 for the same period in 2010. Total recoveries increased to $9.5 million for
the nine months ended September 30, 2011, compared to $1.8 million for the same period in 2010. For
the three months ended September 30, 2011, the net charge-offs were $708,000 for Arkansas and net
charge-offs were $1.6 million for Florida. For the nine months ended September 30, 2011, the net
recoveries were $2.7 million for Arkansas and net charge-offs were $2.7 million for Florida. During
2011, we have had four large recoveries greater than $1.0 million related to debt settlement. These
recoveries range from $1.3 million to $3.0 million and total $7.7 million of the $9.5 million
recovered during 2011.
The charge-offs, recoveries and net charge-offs are reflective of the proactive stance we take
on asset quality issues.
We have not charged off an amount less than what was determined to be the fair value of the
collateral as presented in the appraisal for any period presented. Loans partially charged-off are
placed on non-accrual status until it is proven that the borrowers repayment ability with respect
to the remaining principal balance can be reasonably assured. This is usually established over a
period of 6-12 months of timely payment performance.
See Note 4 Loans Receivable Not Covered by Loss Share and Allowance for Loan Losses to the
Consolidated Financial Statements for an analysis of the allowance for loan losses.
Allocated Allowance for Loan Losses. We use a risk rating and specific reserve methodology in
the calculation and allocation of our allowance for loan losses. While the allowance is allocated
to various loan categories in assessing and evaluating the level of the allowance, the allowance is
available to cover charge-offs incurred in all loan categories. Because a portion of our portfolio
has not matured to the degree necessary to obtain reliable loss data from which to calculate
estimated future losses, the unallocated portion of the allowance is an integral component of the
total allowance. Although unassigned to a particular credit relationship or product segment, this
portion of the allowance is vital to safeguard against the imprecision inherent in estimating
credit losses.
The changes for the period ended September 30, 2011 and the year ended December 31, 2010 in
the allocation of the allowance for loan losses for the individual types of loans are primarily
associated with changes in the ASC 310 calculations, both individual and aggregate, and changes in
the ASC 450 calculations. These calculations are affected by changes in individual loan
impairments, changes in asset quality, net charge-offs during the period and normal changes in the
outstanding loan portfolio, as well any changes to the general allocation factors due to changes
within the actual characteristics of the loan portfolio.
63
Table of Contents
Table 13 presents the allocation of allowance for loan losses as of September 30, 2011 and
December 31, 2010.
Table 13: Allocation of Allowance for Loan Losses
As of September 30, 2011 | As of December 31, 2010 | |||||||||||||||
Allowance Amount | % of loans(1) | Allowance Amount | % of loans(1) | |||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Real estate: |
||||||||||||||||
Commercial real estate loans: |
||||||||||||||||
Non-farm/non-residential |
$ | 22,213 | 40.8 | % | $ | 16,874 | 42.6 | % | ||||||||
Construction/land development |
8,043 | 20.1 | 12,002 | 18.5 | ||||||||||||
Agricultural |
582 | 1.5 | 373 | 1.4 | ||||||||||||
Residential real estate loans: |
||||||||||||||||
Residential 1-4 family |
9,763 | 19.3 | 11,065 | 19.6 | ||||||||||||
Multifamily residential |
3,065 | 3.3 | 3,232 | 3.1 | ||||||||||||
Total real estate |
43,666 | 85.0 | 43,546 | 85.2 | ||||||||||||
Consumer |
1,669 | 2.2 | 815 | 2.7 | ||||||||||||
Commercial and industrial |
6,436 | 9.3 | 6,357 | 9.7 | ||||||||||||
Agricultural |
323 | 1.9 | 207 | 0.9 | ||||||||||||
Other |
| 1.6 | | 1.5 | ||||||||||||
Unallocated |
2,414 | | 2,423 | | ||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 54,508 | 100.0 | % | $ | 53,348 | 100.0 | % | ||||||||
(1) | Percentage of loans in each category to loans receivable not covered by loss share. |
Investments and Securities
Our securities portfolio is the second largest component of earning assets and provides a
significant source of revenue. Securities within the portfolio are classified as held-to-maturity,
available-for-sale, or trading based on the intent and objective of the investment and the ability
to hold to maturity. Fair values of securities are based on quoted market prices where available.
If quoted market prices are not available, estimated fair values are based on quoted market prices
of comparable securities. As of September 30, 2011, we had no held-to-maturity or trading
securities.
Securities available-for-sale are reported at fair value with unrealized holding gains and
losses reported as a separate component of stockholders equity as other comprehensive income.
Securities that are held as available-for-sale are used as a part of our asset/liability management
strategy. Securities may be sold in response to interest rate changes, changes in prepayment risk,
the need to increase regulatory capital, and other similar factors are classified as available for
sale. Available-for-sale securities were $610.5 million as of September 30, 2011, compared to
$469.9 million as of December 31, 2010. The estimated effective duration of our securities
portfolio was 1.7 years as of September 30, 2011.
As of September 30, 2011, $130.3 million, or 21.3%, of our available-for-sale securities were
invested in mortgage-backed securities, compared to $116.1 million, or 24.7%, of our
available-for-sale securities as of December 31, 2010. To reduce our income tax burden, $166.2
million, or 27.2%, of our available-for-sale securities portfolio as of September 30, 2011, was
primarily invested in tax-exempt obligations of state and political subdivisions, compared to
$153.7 million, or 32.7%, of our available-for-sale securities as of December 31, 2010. Also, we
had approximately $299.8 million, or 49.1%, invested in obligations of U.S. Government-sponsored
enterprises as of September 30, 2011, compared to $197.3 million, or 42.0%, of our
available-for-sale securities as of December 31, 2010.
64
Table of Contents
Certain investment securities are valued at less than their historical cost. These declines
are primarily the result of the rate for these investments yielding less than current market rates.
Based on evaluation of available evidence, we believe the declines in fair value for these
securities are temporary. It is our intent to hold these securities to recovery. Should the
impairment of any of these securities become other than temporary, the cost basis of the investment
will be reduced and the resulting loss recognized in net income in the period the other than
temporary impairment is identified.
See Note 3 Investment Securities to the Consolidated Financial Statements for the carrying
value and fair value of investment securities.
Deposits
Our deposits averaged $2.88 billion and $2.90 billion for the three-month and nine-month
periods ended September 30, 2011, respectively. Total deposits decreased $76.7 million, or a
decrease of 3.5%, to $2.89 billion as of September 30, 2011, from $2.96 billion as of December 31,
2010. Deposits are our primary source of funds. We offer a variety of products designed to attract
and retain deposit customers. Those products consist of checking accounts, regular savings
deposits, NOW accounts, money market accounts and certificates of deposit. Deposits are gathered
from individuals, partnerships and corporations in our market areas. In addition, we obtain
deposits from state and local entities and, to a lesser extent, U.S. Government and other
depository institutions.
Our policy also permits the acceptance of brokered deposits. As of September 30, 2011 and
December 31, 2010, brokered deposits were $112.9 million and $98.9 million, respectively. Included
in these brokered deposits are $51.5 million and $51.3 million of Certificate of Deposit Account
Registry Service (CDARS) as of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively. CDARS are
deposits we have swapped our customer with other institutions. This gives our customer the
potential for FDIC insurance of up to $50 million.
The interest rates paid are competitively priced for each particular deposit product and
structured to meet our funding requirements. We will continue to manage interest expense through
deposit pricing. We may allow higher rate deposits to run off during this current period of limited
loan demand. We believe that additional funds can be attracted and deposit growth can be realized
through deposit pricing if we experience increased loan demand or other liquidity needs.
The Federal Reserve Board sets various benchmark rates, including the Federal Funds rate, and
thereby influences the general market rates of interest, including the deposit and loan rates
offered by financial institutions. The Federal Funds rate, which is the cost to banks of
immediately available overnight funds, began in 2008 at 4.25%. During 2008, the rate decreased by
75 basis points on January 22, 2008, 50 basis points on January 30, 2008, 75 basis points on March
18, 2008, 25 basis points on April 30, 2008 and 50 basis points to a rate of 1.50% as of October 8,
2008. The rate continued to fall 50 basis points on October 29, 2008 and 75 to 100 basis points to
a low of 0.25% to 0% on December 16, 2008, where the rate has remained.
65
Table of Contents
Table 14 reflects the classification of the average deposits and the average rate paid on each
deposit category, which is in excess of 10 percent of average total deposits, for the three-month
and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2011 and 2010.
Table 14: Average Deposit Balances and Rates
Three Months Ended September 30, | ||||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||||
Average Amount | Average Rate Paid | Average Amount | Average Rate Paid | |||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Non-interest-bearing transaction accounts |
$ | 464,761 | | % | $ | 346,105 | | % | ||||||||
Interest-bearing transaction accounts |
991,807 | 0.44 | 809,717 | 0.63 | ||||||||||||
Savings deposits |
134,939 | 0.33 | 82,515 | 0.46 | ||||||||||||
Time deposits: |
||||||||||||||||
$100,000 or more |
758,804 | 1.33 | 706,707 | 1.41 | ||||||||||||
Other time deposits |
530,115 | 1.40 | 504,844 | 1.90 | ||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 2,880,426 | 0.78 | % | $ | 2,449,888 | 1.02 | % | ||||||||
Nine Months Ended September 30, | ||||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||||
Average Amount | Average Rate Paid | Average Amount | Average Rate Paid | |||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Non-interest-bearing transaction accounts |
$ | 437,964 | | % | $ | 330,238 | | % | ||||||||
Interest-bearing transaction accounts |
990,613 | 0.49 | 761,305 | 0.62 | ||||||||||||
Savings deposits |
129,666 | 0.40 | 75,876 | 0.44 | ||||||||||||
Time deposits: |
||||||||||||||||
$100,000 or more |
794,364 | 1.27 | 573,766 | 1.70 | ||||||||||||
Other time deposits |
551,883 | 1.53 | 453,666 | 1.89 | ||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 2,904,490 | 0.82 | % | $ | 2,194,851 | 1.07 | % | ||||||||
Securities Sold Under Agreements to Repurchase
We enter into short-term purchases of securities under agreements to resell (resale
agreements) and sales of securities under agreements to repurchase (repurchase agreements) of
substantially identical securities. The amounts advanced under resale agreements and the amounts
borrowed under repurchase agreements are carried on the balance sheet at the amount advanced.
Interest incurred on repurchase agreements is reported as interest expense. Securities sold under
agreements to repurchase decreased $12.1 million, or 21.6%, from $74.5 million as of December 31,
2010 to $62.4 million as of September 30, 2011.
66
Table of Contents
FHLB Borrowed Funds
Our FHLB borrowed funds were $142.9 million and $177.3 million at September 30, 2011 and
December 31, 2010, respectively. All of the outstanding balance for September 30, 2011 and December
31, 2010 were issued as long-term advances. Our remaining FHLB borrowing capacity was $472.0
million and $383.6 million as of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively. Expected
maturities will differ from contractual maturities, because FHLB may have the right to call or
prepay certain obligations.
Subordinated Debentures
Subordinated debentures, which consist of guaranteed payments on trust preferred securities,
were $44.3 million as of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010.
The trust preferred securities are tax-advantaged issues that qualify for Tier 1 capital
treatment subject to certain limitations. Distributions on these securities are included in
interest expense. Each of the trusts is a statutory business trust organized for the sole purpose
of issuing trust securities and investing the proceeds in our subordinated debentures, the sole
asset of each trust. The trust preferred securities of each trust represent preferred beneficial
interests in the assets of the respective trusts and are subject to mandatory redemption upon
payment of the subordinated debentures held by the trust. We wholly own the common securities of
each trust. Each trusts ability to pay amounts due on the trust preferred securities is solely
dependent upon our making payment on the related subordinated debentures. Our obligations under the
subordinated securities and other relevant trust agreements, in aggregate, constitute a full and
unconditional guarantee by us of each respective trusts obligations under the trust securities
issued by each respective trust.
Presently, the funds raised from the trust preferred offerings qualify as Tier 1 capital for
regulatory purposes, subject to the applicable limit, with the balance qualifying as Tier 2
capital.
The Company holds $41.2 million of trust preferred securities which are currently callable
without penalty based on the terms of the specific agreements. The 2009 agreement between the
Company and the Treasury limited our ability to retire any of our qualifying capital. As a result,
of the Company repurchasing in July 2011 all 50,000 shares of its Series A preferred stock which
the Company issued to the Treasury this limitation has been removed.
Stockholders Equity
Stockholders equity was $463.1 million at September 30, 2011 compared to $476.9 million at
December 31, 2010, a decrease of 3.9%. As of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 our equity to
asset ratio was 12.8% and 11.4%, respectively. Book value per share was $16.39 at September 30,
2011 compared to $15.02 at December 31, 2010.
Common Stock Cash Dividends. We declared cash dividends on our common stock of $0.08 and
0.0545 per share for the three-month periods ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 and $0.189 and
$0.163 per share for the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The
common stock dividend payout ratio for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 was 13.2%
and 14.7%, respectively. The 2009 agreement between the Company and the Treasury limited the
payment of dividends on the Common Stock to a quarterly cash dividend of not more than $0.0545 per
share. As a result of the Company repurchasing all 50,000 shares of its Series A Preferred Stock in
July 2011, which the Company issued to the Treasury, this limitation has been removed.
Stock Repurchase Program. During the third quarter of 2011, the Company utilized a small
portion of its previously approved stock repurchase program. This program authorized the repurchase
of 1,188,000 shares of the Companys common stock. For the period beginning August 8, 2011 and
ending September 30, 2011, the Company repurchased a total of 250,000 shares with a weighted
average stock price of $22.15. The Company believes the stock repurchased at this price is an
excellent investment. The repurchased shares will be used to fulfill a proposed future restricted
stock award program for the Companys management team. The third quarter earnings were used to fund
this repurchase.
67
Table of Contents
Liquidity and Capital Adequacy Requirements
Risk-Based Capital. We as well as our bank subsidiary are subject to various regulatory
capital requirements administered by the federal banking agencies. Failure to meet minimum capital
requirements can initiate certain mandatory and other discretionary actions by regulators that, if
enforced, could have a direct material effect on our financial statements. Under capital adequacy
guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, we must meet specific capital
guidelines that involve quantitative measures of our assets, liabilities and certain
off-balance-sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. Our capital amounts
and classifications are also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators as to components,
risk weightings and other factors.
Quantitative measures established by regulation to ensure capital adequacy require us to
maintain minimum amounts and ratios (set forth in the table below) of total and Tier 1 capital to
risk-weighted assets, and of Tier 1 capital to average assets. Management believes that, as of
September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, we met all regulatory capital adequacy requirements to
which we were subject.
Table 15 presents our risk-based capital ratios as of September 30, 2011 and December 31,
2010.
Table 15: Risk-Based Capital
As of | As of | |||||||
September 30, | December 31, | |||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||
Tier 1 capital |
||||||||
Stockholders equity |
$ | 463,139 | $ | 476,925 | ||||
Qualifying trust preferred securities |
43,000 | 43,000 | ||||||
Goodwill and core deposit intangibles, net |
(67,745 | ) | (69,609 | ) | ||||
Unrealized (gain) loss on available-for-sale securities |
(8,786 | ) | (301 | ) | ||||
Total Tier 1 capital |
429,608 | 450,015 | ||||||
Tier 2 capital |
||||||||
Qualifying allowance for loan losses |
33,399 | 33,948 | ||||||
Total Tier 2 capital |
33,399 | 33,948 | ||||||
Total risk-based capital |
$ | 463,007 | $ | 483,963 | ||||
Average total assets for leverage ratio |
$ | 3,560,601 | $ | 3,703,818 | ||||
Risk weighted assets |
$ | 2,650,816 | $ | 2,696,406 | ||||
Ratios at end of period |
||||||||
Leverage ratio |
12.07 | % | 12.15 | % | ||||
Tier 1 risk-based capital |
16.21 | 16.69 | ||||||
Total risk-based capital |
17.47 | 17.95 | ||||||
Minimum guidelines |
||||||||
Leverage ratio |
4.00 | % | 4.00 | % | ||||
Tier 1 risk-based capital |
4.00 | 4.00 | ||||||
Total risk-based capital |
8.00 | 8.00 |
As of the most recent notification from regulatory agencies, our bank subsidiary was
well-capitalized under the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action. To be categorized
as well-capitalized, our banking subsidiary and we must maintain minimum leverage, Tier 1
risk-based capital, and total risk-based capital ratios as set forth in the table. There are no
conditions or events since that notification that we believe have changed the bank subsidiarys
category.
68
Table of Contents
Non-GAAP Financial Measurements
We had $69.0 million, $71.1 million, and $68.1 million total goodwill, core deposit
intangibles and other intangible assets as of September 30, 2011, December 31, 2010 and September
30, 2010, respectively. Because of our level of intangible assets and related amortization
expenses, management believes diluted earnings per share excluding intangible amortization,
tangible book value per common share, return on average assets excluding intangible amortization,
return on average tangible common equity excluding intangible amortization and tangible common
equity to tangible assets are useful in evaluating our company. These calculations, which are
similar to the GAAP calculation of diluted earnings per share, book value, return on average
assets, return on average common equity, and common equity to assets, are presented in Tables 16
through 20, respectively.
Table 16: Diluted Earnings Per Share Excluding Intangible Amortization
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||
(In thousands, except per share data) | ||||||||||||||||
GAAP net income available to common stockholders |
$ | 13,824 | $ | 8,890 | $ | 38,746 | $ | 29,388 | ||||||||
Intangible amortization after-tax |
429 | 410 | 1,290 | 1,055 | ||||||||||||
Earnings available to common stockholders
excluding intangible amortization |
$ | 14,253 | $ | 9,300 | $ | 40,036 | $ | 30,443 | ||||||||
GAAP diluted earnings per common share |
$ | 0.48 | $ | 0.31 | $ | 1.35 | $ | 1.03 | ||||||||
Intangible amortization after-tax |
0.02 | 0.02 | 0.05 | 0.04 | ||||||||||||
Diluted earnings per common share excluding
intangible amortization |
$ | 0.50 | $ | 0.33 | $ | 1.40 | $ | 1.07 | ||||||||
Table 17: Tangible Book Value Per Share
As of | As of | |||||||
September 30, 2011 | December 31, 2010 | |||||||
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data) | ||||||||
Book value per common share: A/B |
$ | 16.39 | $ | 15.02 | ||||
Tangible book value per common share: (A-C-D)/B |
13.95 | 12.52 | ||||||
(A) Total common equity |
$ | 463,139 | $ | 427,469 | ||||
(B) Common shares outstanding |
28,259 | 28,452 | ||||||
(C) Goodwill |
59,663 | 59,663 | ||||||
(D) Core deposit and other intangibles |
9,325 | 11,447 |
69
Table of Contents
Table 18: Return on Average Assets Excluding Intangible Amortization
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Return on average assets: A/C |
1.56 | % | 1.15 | % | 1.48 | % | 1.38 | % | ||||||||
Return on average assets excluding
intangible amortization: B/(C-D) |
1.64 | 1.22 | 1.55 | 1.46 | ||||||||||||
(A) Net income available to all stockholders |
$ | 14,312 | $ | 9,560 | $ | 40,574 | $ | 31,398 | ||||||||
Intangible amortization after-tax |
429 | 410 | 1,290 | 1,055 | ||||||||||||
(B) Earnings excluding intangible amortization |
$ | 14,741 | $ | 9,970 | $ | 41,864 | $ | 32,453 | ||||||||
(C) Average assets |
$ | 3,628,346 | $ | 3,301,736 | $ | 3,674,900 | $ | 3,039,344 | ||||||||
(D) Average goodwill, core deposits and
other intangible assets |
69,333 | 65,584 | 70,031 | 61,151 |
Table 19: Return on Average Tangible Common Equity Excluding Intangible Amortization
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Return on average common equity: A/C |
12.00 | % | 7.81 | % | 11.67 | % | 9.06 | % | ||||||||
Return on average tangible common equity
excluding intangible amortization: B/(C-D) |
14.59 | 9.55 | 14.32 | 10.92 | ||||||||||||
(A) Net income available to common stockholders |
$ | 13,824 | $ | 8,890 | $ | 38,746 | $ | 29,388 | ||||||||
(B) Earnings available to common stockholders excluding
intangible amortization |
14,253 | 9,300 | 40,036 | 30,443 | ||||||||||||
(C) Average common equity |
456,974 | 451,767 | 443,784 | 433,719 | ||||||||||||
(D) Average goodwill, core deposits and other intangible assets |
69,333 | 65,584 | 70,031 | 61,151 |
Table 20: Tangible Common Equity to Tangible Assets
As of | As of | |||||||
September 30, 2011 | December 31, 2010 | |||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||
Equity to assets: B/A |
12.79 | % | 12.68 | % | ||||
Common equity to assets: C/A |
12.79 | 11.36 | ||||||
Tangible common equity to tangible assets: (C-D-E)/(A-D-E) |
11.09 | 9.65 | ||||||
(A) Total assets |
$ | 3,622,166 | $ | 3,762,646 | ||||
(B) Total equity |
463,139 | 476,925 | ||||||
(C) Total common equity |
463,139 | 427,469 | ||||||
(D) Goodwill |
59,663 | 59,663 | ||||||
(E) Core deposit and other intangibles |
9,325 | 11,447 |
70
Table of Contents
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
See Note 18 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for a discussion of certain recently
issued and recently adopted accounting pronouncements.
Item 3: QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Liquidity and Market Risk Management
Liquidity Management. Liquidity refers to the ability or the financial flexibility to manage
future cash flows to meet the needs of depositors and borrowers and fund operations. Maintaining
appropriate levels of liquidity allows us to have sufficient funds available for reserve
requirements, customer demand for loans, withdrawal of deposit balances and maturities of deposits
and other liabilities. Our primary source of liquidity at our holding company is dividends paid by
our bank subsidiary. Applicable statutes and regulations impose restrictions on the amount of
dividends that may be declared by our bank subsidiary. Further, any dividend payments are subject
to the continuing ability of the bank subsidiary to maintain compliance with minimum federal
regulatory capital requirements and to retain its characterization under federal regulations as a
well-capitalized institution.
Our bank subsidiary has potential obligations resulting from the issuance of standby letters
of credit and commitments to fund future borrowings to our loan customers. Many of these
obligations and commitments to fund future borrowings to our loans customers are expected to expire
without being drawn upon, therefore the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent
future cash requirements affecting our liquidity position.
Liquidity needs can be met from either assets or liabilities. On the asset side, our primary
sources of liquidity include cash and due from banks, federal funds sold, available-for-sale
investment securities and scheduled repayments and maturities of loans. We maintain adequate levels
of cash and cash equivalents to meet our day-to-day needs. As of September 30, 2011, our cash and
cash equivalents were $152.8 million, or 4.2% of total assets, compared to $287.5 million, or 7.6%
of total assets, as of December 31, 2010. Our investment securities and federal funds sold were
$614.2 million as of September 30, 2011 and $497.7 million as of December 31, 2010.
We may occasionally use our Fed funds lines of credit in order to temporarily satisfy
short-term liquidity needs. We have Fed funds lines with three other financial institutions
pursuant to which we could have borrowed up to $35.0 million on an unsecured basis as of September
30, 2011 and December 31, 2010. These lines may be terminated by the respective lending
institutions at any time.
We also maintain lines of credit with the Federal Home Loan Bank. Our FHLB borrowed funds were
$142.9 million and $177.3 million at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively. All of
the outstanding balances were issued as long-term advances. Our FHLB borrowing capacity was $472.0
million and $383.6 million as of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010.
We believe that we have sufficient liquidity to satisfy our current operations.
Market Risk Management. Our primary component of market risk is interest rate volatility.
Fluctuations in interest rates will ultimately impact both the level of income and expense recorded
on a large portion of our assets and liabilities, and the market value of all interest-earning
assets and interest-bearing liabilities, other than those which possess a short term to maturity.
We do not hold market risk sensitive instruments for trading purposes. The information provided
should be read in connection with our audited consolidated financial statements.
Asset/Liability Management. Our management actively measures and manages interest rate risk.
The asset/liability committees of the boards of directors of our holding company and bank
subsidiary are also responsible for approving our asset/liability management policies, overseeing
the formulation and implementation of strategies to improve balance sheet positioning and earnings,
and reviewing our interest rate sensitivity position.
71
Table of Contents
One of the tools that our management uses to measure short-term interest rate risk is a net
interest income simulation model. This analysis calculates the difference between net interest
income forecasted using base market rates and using a rising and a falling interest rate scenario.
The income simulation model includes various assumptions regarding the re-pricing relationships for
each of our products. Many of our assets are floating rate loans, which are assumed to re-price
immediately, and proportional to the change in market rates, depending on their contracted index.
Some loans and investments include the opportunity of prepayment (embedded options), and
accordingly the simulation model uses indexes to estimate these prepayments and reinvest their
proceeds at current yields. Our non-term deposit products re-price more slowly, usually changing
less than the change in market rates and at our discretion.
This analysis indicates the impact of changes in net interest income for the given set of rate
changes and assumptions. It assumes the balance sheet remains static and that its structure does
not change over the course of the year. It does not account for all factors that impact this
analysis, including changes by management to mitigate the impact of interest rate changes or
secondary impacts such as changes to our credit risk profile as interest rates change.
Furthermore, loan prepayment rate estimates and spread relationships change regularly.
Interest rate changes create changes in actual loan prepayment rates that will differ from the
market estimates incorporated in this analysis. Changes that vary significantly from the
assumptions may have significant effects on our net interest income.
Interest Rate Sensitivity. Our primary business is banking and the resulting earnings,
primarily net interest income, are susceptible to changes in market interest rates. It is
managements goal to maximize net interest income within acceptable levels of interest rate and
liquidity risks.
A key element in the financial performance of financial institutions is the level and type of
interest rate risk assumed. The single most significant measure of interest rate risk is the
relationship of the repricing periods of earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities. The more
closely the repricing periods are correlated, the less interest rate risk we assume. We use
repricing gap and simulation modeling as the primary methods in analyzing and managing interest
rate risk.
Gap analysis attempts to capture the amounts and timing of balances exposed to changes in
interest rates at a given point in time. Our gap position as of September 30, 2011 was asset
sensitive with a one-year cumulative repricing gap of 10.6%. During these periods, the amount of
change our asset base realizes in relation to the total change in market interest rate exceeds that
of the liability base.
We have a portion of our securities portfolio invested in mortgage-backed securities.
Mortgage-backed securities are included based on their final maturity date. Expected maturities may
differ from contractual maturities because borrowers may have the right to call or prepay
obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties.
72
Table of Contents
Table 21 presents a summary of the repricing schedule of our interest-earning assets and
interest-bearing liabilities (gap) as of September 30, 2011.
Table 21: Interest Rate Sensitivity
Interest Rate Sensitivity Period | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
0-30 | 31-90 | 91-180 | 181-365 | 1-2 | 2-5 | Over 5 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Days | Days | Days | Days | Years | Years | Years | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Earning assets |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest-bearing
deposits due
from banks |
$ | 104,053 | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | 104,053 | ||||||||||||||||
Federal funds
sold |
3,670 | | | | | | | 3,670 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investment
securities |
51,597 | 60,427 | 52,044 | 87,507 | 93,330 | 89,662 | 175,955 | 610,522 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Loans
receivable |
531,277 | 224,938 | 302,810 | 470,117 | 414,833 | 306,845 | 86,879 | 2,337,699 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total earning
assets |
690,597 | 285,365 | 354,854 | 557,624 | 508,163 | 396,507 | 262,834 | 3,055,944 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest-bearing
liabilities |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest-bearing
transaction and
savings
deposits |
41,410 | 82,819 | 124,229 | 248,456 | 215,483 | 215,500 | 215,438 | 1,143,335 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Time deposits |
127,195 | 154,612 | 252,237 | 440,456 | 180,397 | 107,205 | 100 | 1,262,202 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal funds
purchased |
| | | | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Securities sold
under
repurchase
agreements |
53,046 | | | | 1,248 | 3,744 | 4,369 | 62,407 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
FHLB borrowed
funds |
24 | 47 | 71 | 12,158 | 30,294 | 10,715 | 89,592 | 142,901 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subordinated
debentures |
25,773 | 3,093 | | | | | 15,465 | 44,331 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total interest-
bearing
liabilities |
247,448 | 240,571 | 376,537 | 701,070 | 427,422 | 337,164 | 324,964 | 2,655,176 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest rate
sensitivity gap |
$ | 443,149 | $ | 44,794 | $ | (21,683 | ) | $ | (143,446 | ) | $ | 80,741 | $ | 59,343 | $ | (62,130 | ) | $ | 400,768 | |||||||||||||
Cumulative
interest rate
sensitivity gap |
$ | 443,149 | $ | 487,943 | $ | 466,260 | $ | 322,814 | $ | 403,555 | $ | 462,898 | $ | 400,768 | ||||||||||||||||||
Cumulative rate
sensitive assets
to rate sensitive
liabilities |
279.1 | % | 200.0 | % | 153.9 | % | 120.6 | % | 120.2 | % | 119.9 | % | 115.1 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
Cumulative gap
as a % of total
earning assets |
14.5 | % | 16.0 | % | 15.3 | % | 10.6 | % | 13.2 | % | 15.1 | % | 13.1 | % |
73
Table of Contents
Item 4: CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Article I. Evaluation of Disclosure Controls
Based on their evaluation as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that the disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934) are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in reports that we
file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and
reported within the time periods specified in Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms.
Additionally, our disclosure controls and procedures were also effective in ensuring that
information required to be disclosed in our Exchange Act report is accumulated and communicated to
our management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer to allow timely
decisions regarding required disclosures.
Article II. Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There have not been any changes in the Companys internal controls over financial reporting
during the quarter ended September 30, 2011, which have materially affected, or are reasonably
likely to materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
PART II: OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
There are no material pending legal proceedings, other than ordinary routine litigation
incidental to its business, to which Home BancShares, Inc. or its subsidiaries are a party or of
which any of their property is the subject.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
There were no material changes from the risk factors set forth in Part I, Item 1A, Risk
Factors, of our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010. See the discussion of our risk
factors in the Form 10-K, as filed with the SEC. The risks described are not the only risks facing
the Company. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently
deem to be immaterial also may materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and/or
operating results.
Item 2: Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
Not applicable.
Item 3: Defaults Upon Senior Securities
Not applicable.
Item 4: (Reserved)
74
Table of Contents
Item 5: Other Information
Not applicable.
Item 6: Exhibits
12.1 | Computation of Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges* |
|||
15 | Awareness of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm* |
|||
31.1 | CEO Certification Pursuant Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)* |
|||
31.2 | CFO Certification Pursuant Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)* |
|||
32.1 | CEO Certification Pursuant 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002* |
|||
32.2 | CFO Certification Pursuant 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002* |
|||
101.INS | XBRL Instance Document* |
|||
101.SCH | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document* |
|||
101.CAL | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document* |
|||
101.LAB | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document* |
|||
101.PRE | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document* |
|||
101.DEF | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document* |
* | Filed herewith |
75
Table of Contents
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
HOME BANCSHARES, INC.
(Registrant)
(Registrant)
Date: November 8, 2011 | /s/ C. Randall Sims | |||
C. Randall Sims, Chief Executive Officer | ||||
Date: November 8, 2011 | /s/ Randy E. Mayor | |||
Randy E. Mayor, Chief Financial Officer | ||||
76