HUGOTON ROYALTY TRUST - Quarter Report: 2009 June (Form 10-Q)

Unassociated Document

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

Form 10-Q

x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2009

¨ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Commission File Number: 1-10476

Hugoton Royalty Trust

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Texas		58-6379215
(State or other jurisdiction of		(I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization)		Identification No.)

U.S. Trust, Bank of America
Private Wealth Management
P.O. Box 830650, Dallas, Texas		75283-0650
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)

(877) 228-5083

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

NONE

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if change since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ¨ No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act (check one):

Large accelerated filer þ	Accelerated filer ¨
Non-accelerated filer ¨ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)	Smaller reporting company ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 12b-2). Yes o No þ

Indicate the number of units of beneficial interest outstanding, as of the latest practicable date:

Outstanding as of July 1, 2009

40,000,000

HUGOTON ROYALTY TRUST

FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 2009

	TABLE OF CONTENTS

		Page

	Glossary of Terms	3

PART I.	FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1.	Financial Statements	4

	Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm	5

	Condensed Statements of Assets, Liabilities and Trust Corpus at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008	6

	Condensed Statements of Distributable Income for the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2009 and 2008	7

	Condensed Statements of Changes in Trust Corpus for the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2009 and 2008	8

	Notes to Condensed Financial Statements	9

Item 2.	Trustee’s Discussion and Analysis	13

Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk	18

Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	19

PART II.	OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1A.	Risk Factors	20

Item 6.	Exhibits	20

	Signatures	21

HUGOTON ROYALTY TRUST

GLOSSARY OF TERMS

The following are definitions of significant terms used in this Form 10-Q:

Bbl	Barrel (of oil)

Mcf	Thousand cubic feet (of natural gas)

MMBtu	One million British Thermal Units, a common energy measurement

net proceeds	Gross proceeds received by XTO Energy from sale of production from the underlying properties, less applicable costs, as defined in the net profits interest conveyances

net profits income	Net proceeds multiplied by the net profits percentage of 80%, which is paid to the trust by XTO Energy. “Net profits income” is referred to as “royalty income” for tax reporting purposes.

net profits interest	An interest in an oil and gas property measured by net profits from the sale of production, rather than a specific portion of production. The following defined net profits interests were conveyed to the trust from the underlying properties:

	80% net profits interests - interests that entitle the trust to receive 80% of the net proceeds from the underlying properties.

underlying properties	XTO Energy’s interest in certain oil and gas properties from which the net profits interests were conveyed. The underlying properties include working interests in predominantly gas-producing properties located in Kansas, Oklahoma and Wyoming.

working interest	An operating interest in an oil and gas property that provides the owner a specified share of production that is subject to all production expense and development costs

HUGOTON ROYALTY TRUST

PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements.

The condensed financial statements included herein are presented, without audit, pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in annual financial statements have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations, although the trustee believes that the disclosures are adequate to make the information presented not misleading. These condensed financial statements should be read in conjunction with the trust’s financial statements and the notes thereto included in the trust’s Annual Report on Form 10-K. In the opinion of the trustee, all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, necessary to present fairly the assets, liabilities and trust corpus of the Hugoton Royalty Trust at June 30, 2009 and the distributable income and changes in trust corpus for the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 have been included. Distributable income for such interim periods is not necessarily indicative of the distributable income for the full year.

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

Bank of America, N.A., as Trustee

for the Hugoton Royalty Trust:

We have reviewed the accompanying condensed statement of assets, liabilities and trust corpus of the Hugoton Royalty Trust as of June 30, 2009 and the related condensed statements of distributable income and changes in trust corpus for the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2009 and 2008. These condensed financial statements are the responsibility of the trustee.

We conducted our review in accordance with standards established by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). A review of interim financial information consists principally of applying analytical procedures to financial data and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and accounting matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the objective of which is the expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.

The accompanying condensed financial statements are prepared on a modified cash basis as described in Note 1 which is a comprehensive basis of accounting other than accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Based on our review, we are not aware of any material modifications that should be made to the condensed financial statements referred to above for them to be in conformity with the basis of accounting described in Note 1.

We have previously audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the statement of assets, liabilities and trust corpus of the Hugoton Royalty Trust as of December 31, 2008, and the related statements of distributable income and changes in trust corpus for the year then ended (not presented herein), included in the trust’s 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K, and in our report dated February 25, 2009, we expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements. In our opinion, the information set forth in the accompanying condensed statement of assets, liabilities and trust corpus as of December 31, 2008 is fairly stated, in all material respects, in relation to the statement of assets, liabilities and trust corpus included in the trust’s 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K from which it has been derived.

KPMG LLP

Fort Worth, Texas

July 20, 2009

HUGOTON ROYALTY TRUST

Condensed Statements of Assets, Liabilities and Trust Corpus

	June 30,		December 31,
	2009		2008
	(Unaudited)
ASSETS

Cash and short-term investments	$	1,859,440	$	1,145,840

Net profits interests in oil and gas properties - net (Note 1)		144,358,176		146,722,015

	$	146,217,616	$	147,867,855

LIABILITIES AND TRUST CORPUS

Distribution payable to unitholders	$	1,859,440	$	1,145,840

Trust corpus (40,000,000 units of beneficial interest authorized and outstanding)		144,358,176		146,722,015

	$	146,217,616	$	147,867,855

The accompanying notes to condensed financial statements are an integral part of these statements.

HUGOTON ROYALTY TRUST

Condensed Statements of Distributable Income (Unaudited)

	Three Months Ended				Six Months Ended
	June 30				June 30
	2009		2008		2009		2008

Net profits income	$	4,537,110	$	33,899,248	$	10,314,535	$	55,935,102

Interest income		136		18,965		268		42,751

Total income		4,537,246		33,918,213		10,314,803		55,977,853

Administration expense		273,526		363,293		585,723		653,773

Distributable income	$	4,263,720	$	33,554,920	$	9,729,080	$	55,324,080

Distributable income per unit (40,000,000 units)	$	0.106593	$	0.838873	$	0.243227	$	1.383102

The accompanying notes to condensed financial statements are an integral part of these statements.

HUGOTON ROYALTY TRUST

Condensed Statements of Changes in Trust Corpus (Unaudited)

	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
	June 30						June 30
	2009			2008			2009			2008

Trust corpus, beginning of period	$	145,526,964		$	153,688,416		$	146,722,015		$	155,820,033

Amortization of net profits interests		(1,168,788	)		(2,674,650	)		(2,363,839	)		(4,806,267	)

Distributable income		4,263,720			33,554,920			9,729,080			55,324,080

Distributions declared		(4,263,720	)		(33,554,920	)		(9,729,080	)		(55,324,080	)

Trust corpus, end of period	$	144,358,176		$	151,013,766		$	144,358,176		$	151,013,766

The accompanying notes to condensed financial statements are an integral part of these statements.

HUGOTON ROYALTY TRUST

Notes to Condensed Financial Statements (Unaudited)

1.	Basis of Accounting

The financial statements of Hugoton Royalty Trust are prepared on the following basis and are not intended to present financial position and results of operations in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”):

Net profits income recorded for a month is the amount computed and paid by XTO Energy Inc., the owner of the underlying properties, to Bank of America, N.A., as trustee for the trust. Net profits income consists of net proceeds received by XTO Energy from the underlying properties in the prior month, multiplied by a net profits percentage of 80%.

Costs deducted in the calculation of net proceeds for the 80% net profits interests generally include applicable taxes, transportation, marketing and legal costs, production expense, development costs, operating charges and other costs.

Net profits income is computed separately for each of three conveyances under which the net profits interests were conveyed to the trust. If monthly costs exceed revenues for any conveyance, such excess costs must be recovered, with accrued interest, from future net proceeds of that conveyance and cannot reduce net proceeds from the other conveyances.

Trust expenses are recorded based on liabilities paid and cash reserves established by the trustee for liabilities and contingencies.

Distributions to unitholders are recorded when declared by the trustee.

The trust’s financial statements differ from those prepared in conformity with U.S. GAAP because revenues are recognized when received rather than accrued in the month of production, expenses are recognized when paid rather than when incurred and certain cash reserves may be established by the trustee for contingencies which would not be recorded under U.S. GAAP. This comprehensive basis of accounting other than U.S. GAAP corresponds to the accounting permitted for royalty trusts by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, as specified by Staff Accounting Bulletin Topic 12:E, Financial Statements of Royalty Trusts.

Most accounting pronouncements apply to entities whose financial statements are prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP, directing such entities to accrue or defer revenues and expenses in a period other than when such revenues were received or expenses were paid. Because the trust’s financial statements are prepared on the modified cash basis, as described above, most accounting pronouncements are not applicable to the trust’s financial statements.

companies to: (a) report the independence and qualifications of its reserves preparer or auditor; (b) file reports when a third party is relied upon to prepare reserves estimates or conducts a reserves audit; and (c) report oil and gas reserves using an average price based upon the prior 12-month period rather than year-end prices. The new disclosure requirements are effective for financial statements for fiscal years ending on or after December 31, 2009. The effect of adopting the SEC rule has not been determined, but it is not expected to have a significant effect on the trust’s reported financial position or distributable income.

The initial carrying value of the net profits interests of $247,066,951 represents XTO Energy’s historical net book value for the interests on December 1, 1998, the date of the transfer to the trust. Amortization of the net profits interests is calculated on a unit-of-production basis and charged directly to trust corpus. Accumulated amortization was $102,708,775 as of June 30, 2009 and $100,344,936 as of December 31, 2008.

2.	Development Costs

The following summarizes actual development costs, budgeted development costs deducted in the calculation of net profits income, and the cumulative actual costs compared to the amount deducted:

	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
	June 30						June 30
	2009			2008			2009			2008
Cumulative actual costs under (over) the amount deducted - beginning of period	$	(3,594,645	)	$	1,432,611		$	(7,314,084	)	$	(675,754	)
Actual costs		(906,768	)		(7,953,439	)		(9,187,329	)		(17,095,074	)
Budgeted costs deducted		5,000,000			11,250,000			17,000,000			22,500,000
Cumulative actual costs under the amount deducted - end of period	$	498,587		$	4,729,172		$	498,587		$	4,729,172

The development cost deduction was maintained at $3.75 million from the January 2008 distribution through the August 2008 distribution. Due to higher than anticipated costs, the monthly development cost deduction was increased to $4.0 million beginning with the September 2008 distribution and was maintained at that level through the March 2009 distribution. As a result of decreased development activity and the revised 2009 development budget, the development cost deduction was decreased to $2.0 million beginning with the April 2009 distribution and was further reduced to $1.0 million beginning with the June 2009 distribution. The monthly deduction is based on the current level of development expenditures, budgeted future development costs and the cumulative actual costs under (over) previous deductions.

XTO Energy has advised the trustee that revised total 2009 budgeted development costs for the underlying properties are approximately $10.0 million to $12.0 million. The 2009 budget year generally coincides with the trust distribution months from April 2009 through March 2010. The monthly development cost deduction will be reevaluated by XTO Energy and revised as necessary, based on the 2009 budget and the timing and amount of actual expenditures.

3.	Contingencies

Litigation

On October 17, 1997, an action, styled United States of America ex rel. Grynberg v. Cross Timbers Oil Company, et al., was filed in the United States District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma by Jack J. Grynberg on behalf of the United States under the qui tam provisions of the U.S. False Claims Act against XTO Energy. Grynberg alleges that XTO Energy underpaid royalties on natural gas produced from federal leases and lands owned by Native Americans in amounts in excess of 20% as a result of mismeasuring the volume of natural gas, incorrectly analyzing its heating content and improperly valuing the natural gas. Grynberg seeks treble damages for the unpaid royalties (with interest, attorney’s fees and expenses), civil penalties between $5,000 and $10,000 for each violation of the U.S. False Claims Act, and an order for XTO Energy to cease the allegedly improper measuring practices. This lawsuit against XTO Energy and similar lawsuits filed by Grynberg against more than 300 other companies was consolidated in the United States District Court for Wyoming. In October 2002, the court granted a motion to dismiss Grynberg’s royalty valuation claims, and Grynberg’s appeal of this decision was dismissed for lack of appellate jurisdiction in May 2003. In response to a motion to dismiss filed by XTO Energy and other defendants, in October 2006 the district judge held that Grynberg failed to establish the jurisdictional requirements to maintain the action against XTO Energy and other defendants and dismissed the actions for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Grynberg filed an appeal of this decision to the United States Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals. In March 2009, the Tenth Circuit affirmed the trial court’s dismissal of the case. Grynberg is seeking review of the Tenth Circuit’s decision with the United States Supreme Court. While XTO Energy is unable to predict the final outcome of this case or estimate the amount of any possible loss, it has informed the trustee that it believes that the allegations of this lawsuit are without merit and intends to vigorously defend the action. However, an order to change measuring practices or a related settlement could adversely affect the trust by reducing net proceeds in the future by an amount that is presently not determinable, but, in XTO Energy management’s opinion, is not currently expected to be material to the trust’s annual distributable income, financial position or liquidity.

An amended petition for a class action lawsuit, Beer, et al. v. XTO Energy Inc., was filed in January 2006 in the District Court of Texas County, Oklahoma by certain royalty owners of natural gas wells in Oklahoma and Kansas. The plaintiffs allege that XTO Energy has not properly accounted to the plaintiffs for the royalties to which they are entitled and seek an accounting regarding the natural gas and other products produced from their wells and the prices paid for the natural gas and other products produced, and for payment of the monies allegedly owed since June 2002, with a certain limited number of plaintiffs claiming monies owed for additional time. XTO Energy removed the case to federal district court in Oklahoma City. A hearing on the class certification was conducted in October 2008. At the class certification hearing, the plaintiffs sought to certify a class of royalty owners whose wells were connected to a processing plant owned by a subsidiary of XTO Energy in the Hugoton Field, with two sub-classes consisting of owners in Oklahoma and Kansas. In March 2009, the District Court granted the motion to certify the class. The plaintiffs have not alleged in their petition an amount that they are seeking. XTO Energy has informed the trustee that it believes that it has strong defenses to this lawsuit and intends to vigorously defend its position. However, if XTO Energy ultimately makes any settlement payments or receives a judgment against it, the trust will bear its 80% share of such settlement or judgment related to production from the underlying properties. Additionally, if a judgment or settlement increases the amount of future payments to royalty owners, the trust would bear its proportionate share of the increased payments through reduced net proceeds. XTO Energy has informed the trustee that, although the amount of any reduction in net proceeds is not presently determinable, in its management’s opinion, the amount is not currently expected to be material to the trust’s annual distributable income, financial position or liquidity. It could, however, result in the costs exceeding revenues on the properties underlying the Oklahoma and Kansas net profit interests for one or more monthly distributions, depending on the size of the judgment or settlement and the net proceeds being paid at the time a judgment or settlement is paid.

In September 2008, a class action lawsuit was filed against XTO Energy styled Wallace B. Roderick Revocable Living Trust, et al. v. XTO Energy Inc. in the District Court of Kearny County, Kansas. XTO Energy removed the case to federal court in Wichita, Kansas. The plaintiffs allege that XTO Energy has improperly taken post-production costs from royalties paid to the plaintiffs from wells located in Kansas, Oklahoma and Colorado. The plaintiffs also seek to represent all royalty owners in these three states as a class. The plaintiff’s claims overlap the claims made by the plaintiffs in the Beer case as to certain properties. XTO Energy has answered and denied all claims. XTO Energy has informed the trustee that it believes that XTO Energy has strong defenses to this lawsuit and intends to vigorously defend its position. However, if XTO Energy ultimately makes any settlement payments or receives a judgment against it, the trust will bear its 80% share of such settlement or judgment related to production from the underlying properties. Additionally, if the judgment or settlement increases the amount of future payments to royalty owners, the trust would bear its proportionate share of the increased payments through reduced net proceeds. XTO Energy has informed the trustee that, although the amount of any reduction in net proceeds is not presently determinable, in its management’s opinion, the amount is not currently expected to be material to the trust’s annual distributable income, financial position or liquidity. It could, however, result in the costs exceeding revenues on the properties underlying the Oklahoma and Kansas net profit interests for one or more monthly distributions, depending on the size of the judgment or settlement and the net proceeds being paid at the time a judgment or settlement is paid.

Certain of the underlying properties are involved in various other lawsuits and certain governmental proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business. XTO Energy has advised the trustee that it does not believe that the ultimate resolution of these claims will have a material effect on trust annual distributable income, financial position or liquidity.

Other

Several states have enacted legislation to require state income tax withholding from nonresident recipients of oil and gas proceeds. After consultation with its state tax counsel, XTO Energy has advised the trustee that it believes the trust is not subject to these withholding requirements. However, regulations could be issued by the various states which could change this conclusion. Should the trust be required to withhold state taxes, distributions to the unitholders would be reduced by the required amount, subject to the unitholder’s right to file a state tax return to claim any refund due.

4.	Excess Costs

Costs exceeded revenues by $853,468 ($682,774 net to the trust) on properties underlying the Wyoming net profits interests in November and December 2007. Limited pipeline capacity for shipping from the Rocky Mountain region and excess regional supply led to significantly lower realized regional gas prices for production. These lower gas prices caused costs to exceed revenues on properties underlying the Wyoming net profits interests, however, these excess costs did not reduce net proceeds from the remaining conveyances. XTO Energy advised the trustee that with the onset of winter demand and the completion of the first phase of a major pipeline expansion in January 2008, Rocky Mountain gas prices increased and the excess costs, plus accrued interest of $10,090 ($8,072 net to the trust), were fully recovered by February 2008.

Item 2. Trustee’s Discussion and Analysis.

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the trustee’s discussion and analysis contained in the trust’s 2008 annual report, as well as the condensed financial statements and notes thereto included in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q. The trust’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and all amendments to those reports are available on the trust’s web site at www.hugotontrust.com.

Distributable Income

Quarter

For the quarter ended June 30, 2009, net profits income was $4,537,110, as compared to $33,899,248 for second quarter 2008. This 87% decrease in net profits income is primarily the result of lower oil and gas prices and lower oil and gas production, partially offset by lower development costs and lower taxes, transportation and other costs. See “Net Profits Income” on the following page.

After adding interest income of $136 and deducting administration expense of $273,526, distributable income for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 was $4,263,720, or $0.106593 per unit of beneficial interest. Changes in interest income are attributable to fluctuations in net profits income and interest rates. Administration expense for the quarter was lower than the prior year quarter primarily because of the timing of expenditures. For second quarter 2008, distributable income was $33,554,920, or $0.838873 per unit. Distributions to unitholders for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 were:

		Distribution
Record Date	Payment Date	per Unit
April 30, 2009	May 14, 2009	$	0.030901
May 29, 2009	June 12, 2009		0.029206
June 30, 2009	July 14, 2009		0.046486
		$	0.106593

Six Months

For the six months ended June 30, 2009, net profits income was $10,314,535 compared with $55,935,102 for the same 2008 period. This 82% decrease in net profits income is primarily the result of lower oil and gas prices and lower oil and gas production, partially offset by lower development costs and lower taxes, transportation and other costs. See “Net Profits Income” on the following page.

After adding interest income of $268 and deducting administration expense of $585,723, distributable income for the six months ended June 30, 2009 was $9,729,080, or $0.243227 per unit of beneficial interest. Changes in interest income are attributable to fluctuations in net profits income and interest rates. Administration expense for the first six months of 2009 was lower than in the first six months of 2008 primarily because of the timing of expenditures. For the six months ended June 30, 2008, distributable income was $55,324,080, or $1.383102 per unit.

Net Profits Income

Net profits income is recorded when received by the trust, which is the month following receipt by XTO Energy, and generally two months after oil and gas production. Net profits income is generally affected by three major factors:

oil and gas sales volumes,

oil and gas sales prices, and

costs deducted in the calculation of net profits income.

The following is a summary of the calculation of net profits income received by the trust:

	Three Months									Six Months
	Ended June 30 (a)						Increase			Ended June 30 (a)						Increase
	2009			2008			(Decrease)			2009			2008			(Decrease)
Sales Volumes
Gas (Mcf) (b)
Underlying properties		6,462,737			7,100,086			(9	)%		13,573,002			14,267,674			(5	)%
Average per day		72,615			78,890			(8	)%		74,989			78,394			(4	)%
Net profits interests		1,421,757			3,861,217			(63	)%		2,875,683			6,938,696			(59	)%

Oil (Bbls) (b)
Underlying properties		69,193			94,807			(27	)%		133,811			169,028			(21	)%
Average per day		777			1,053			(26	)%		739			929			(20	)%
Net profits interests		18,718			50,066			(63	)%		33,207			84,931			(61	)%

Average Sales Prices
Gas (per Mcf)	$	2.96		$	8.26			(64	)%	$	3.48		$	7.37			(53	)%
Oil (per Bbl)	$	40.38		$	102.16			(60	)%	$	42.59		$	98.69			(57	)%

Revenues
Gas sales	$	19,100,449		$	58,622,294			(67	)%	$	47,296,640		$	105,120,701			(55	)%
Oil sales		2,794,176			9,685,436			(71	)%		5,698,493			16,681,879			(66	)%

Total Revenues		21,894,625			68,307,730			(68	)%		52,995,133			121,802,580			(56	)%

Costs
Taxes, transportation and other		3,029,840			5,986,350			(49	)%		6,815,720			11,439,921			(40	)%
Production expense		5,583,928			6,324,110			(12	)%		11,111,916			12,394,124			(10	)%
Development costs (c)		5,000,000			11,250,000			(56	)%		17,000,000			22,500,000			(24	)%
Overhead		2,609,469			2,373,210			10	%		5,174,328			4,686,099			10	%
Excess Costs (d)		-			-			-			-			863,558			(100	)%

Total Costs		16,223,237			25,933,670			(37	)%		40,101,964			51,883,702			(23	)%

Net Proceeds		5,671,388			42,374,060			(87	)%		12,893,169			69,918,878			(82	)%

Net Profits Percentage		80	%		80	%					80	%		80	%

Net Profits Income	$	4,537,110		$	33,899,248			(87	)%	$	10,314,535		$	55,935,102			(82	)%

(a)

Because of the two-month interval between time of production and receipt of net profits income by the trust, (1) oil and gas sales for the quarter ended June 30 generally represent production for the period February through April and (2) oil and gas sales for the six months ended June 30 generally represent production for the period November through April.

(b)

Oil and gas sales volumes are allocated to the net profits interests based upon a formula that considers oil and gas prices and the total amount of production expense and development costs. Changes in any of these factors may result in disproportionate fluctuations in volumes allocated to the net profits interests. Therefore, comparative discussion of oil and gas sales volumes is based on the underlying properties.

(c)	See Note 2 to Condensed Financial Statements.

(d)	See Note 4 to Condensed Financial Statements.

The following are explanations of significant variances on the underlying properties from second quarter 2008 to second quarter 2009 and from the first six months of 2008 to the comparable period in 2009:

Sales Volumes

Gas

Gas sales volumes decreased 9% for the second quarter as compared with the same 2008 period primarily because of natural production decline and the timing of cash receipts, partially offset by increased production from new wells and workovers. Gas sales volumes decreased 5% for the six-month period as compared with the same 2008 period primarily because of natural production decline, partially offset by increased production from new wells and workovers and the timing of cash receipts.

Oil

Oil sales volumes decreased 27% for the second quarter and 21% for the six-month period as compared with the same 2008 periods primarily because of natural production decline and the timing of cash receipts, partially offset by increased production from new wells and workovers.

Sales Prices

Gas

The second quarter 2009 average gas price was $2.96 per Mcf, a 64% decrease from the first quarter 2008 average gas price of $8.26 per Mcf. For the six-month period, the average gas price decreased 53% to $3.48 per Mcf in 2009 from $7.37 per Mcf in 2008. Due to concerns of oversupply from shale gas development, declining demand due to the U.S. recession and increased gas storage, gas prices have declined. Prices will continue to be affected by the level of North American production, weather, oil prices, the U.S. economy, storage levels and import levels of liquified natural gas. Natural gas prices are expected to remain volatile. The second quarter 2009 gas price is primarily related to production from February through April 2009, when the average NYMEX price was $4.05 per MMBtu. The average NYMEX price for May and June 2009 was $3.43 per MMBtu. At July 14, 2009, the average NYMEX futures price for the following twelve months was $4.86 per MMBtu. Recent trust gas prices have averaged approximately 28% lower than the NYMEX price.

Oil

The second quarter 2009 average oil price was $40.38 per Bbl, a 60% decrease from the second quarter 2008 average oil price of $102.16 per Bbl. The year-to-date average oil price decreased 57% to $42.59 per Bbl in 2009 from $98.69 per Bbl in 2008. Lower demand as a result of the global economic situation and rising crude oil supplies caused oil prices to decline in the first quarter of 2009. However, signs of possible economic improvement have resulted in higher recent oil prices. Oil prices are expected to remain volatile. The second quarter 2009 oil price is primarily related to production from February through April 2009, when the average NYMEX price was $46.01 per Bbl. The average NYMEX price for May and June 2009 was $64.51 per Bbl. At July 14, 2009, the average NYMEX futures price for the following twelve months was $63.91 per Bbl. Recent trust oil prices have averaged approximately 12% lower than the NYMEX price.

Costs

Taxes, Transportation and Other

Taxes, transportation and other decreased 49% for the quarter and 40% for the six-month period primarily because of decreased production taxes related to lower oil and gas revenues, partially offset by increased other deductions.

Production

Production expense decreased 12% for the quarter and 10% for the six-month period primarily because of decreased repairs and maintenance, fuel and location costs, partially offset by mechanical and marketing rebates included in 2008 and increased compressor costs. In addition, decreased production expense for the six-month period was partially offset by increased labor costs.

Development

Development costs deducted in the calculation of net profits income are based on the development budget. These development costs decreased 56% for the second quarter and 24% for the six-month period primarily because of decreased development activity. During the first half of 2009, two wells were completed on the underlying properties and two wells were pending completion at June 30.

As of December 31, 2008, cumulative actual costs exceeded cumulative budgeted costs deducted by approximately $7.3 million. In calculating net profits income, XTO Energy deducted budgeted development costs of $5 million for the quarter and $17 million for the six-month period. After considering actual development costs of $0.9 million for the quarter and $9.2 million for the six-month period, cumulative budgeted costs deducted exceeded actual costs by approximately $0.5 million at June 30, 2009.

XTO Energy has advised the trustee that revised total 2009 budgeted development costs for the underlying properties are approximately $10.0 million to $12.0 million. The 2009 budget year generally coincides with the trust distribution months from April 2009 through March 2010. The monthly development cost deduction is currently $1.0 million. The monthly development cost deduction will be reevaluated by XTO Energy and revised as necessary, based on the 2009 budget and the timing and amount of actual expenditures. See Note 2 to Condensed Financial Statements.

Overhead

Overhead increased 10% for the quarter and six-month period primarily because of the annual rate adjustment based on an industry index.

Excess Costs

Pending Securities and Exchange Commission Rule

In December 2008, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) released Final Rule, Modernization of Oil and Gas Reporting. The new disclosure requirements include provisions that permit the use of new technologies to determine proved reserves if those technologies have been demonstrated empirically to lead to reliable conclusions about reserves volumes. The new requirements also will allow companies to disclose their probable and possible reserves to investors. In addition, the new disclosure requirements require companies to: (a) report the independence and qualifications of its reserves preparer or auditor; (b) file reports when a third party is relied upon to prepare reserves estimates or conducts a reserves audit; and (c) report oil and gas reserves using an average price based upon the prior 12-month period rather than year-end prices. The new disclosure requirements are effective for financial statements for fiscal years ending on or after December 31, 2009. The effect of adopting the SEC rule has not been determined, but it is not expected to have a significant effect on the trust’s reported financial position or distributable income.

Forward-Looking Statements

This Form 10-Q includes “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. All statements other than statements of historical fact included in this Form 10-Q, including, without limitation, statements regarding the net profits interests, underlying properties, development activities, annual and monthly development, production and other costs and expenses, oil and gas prices and differentials to NYMEX prices, supply levels, future drilling, workover and restimulation plans, distributions to unitholders and industry and market conditions, are forward-looking statements that are subject to risks and uncertainties which are detailed in Part I, Item 1A of the trust’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, which is incorporated by this reference as though fully set forth herein. Although XTO Energy and the trustee believe that the expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements are reasonable, neither XTO Energy nor the trustee can give any assurance that such expectations will prove to be correct.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk.

There have been no material changes in the trust’s market risks from the information disclosed in Part II, Item 7A of the trust’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 other than the addition of the market risk described below:

Currently, cash held by the trustee as a reserve for liabilities and for the payment of expenses and distributions to unitholders is invested in Bank of America, N.A. certificates of deposit which are backed by the good faith and credit of Bank of America, N.A., but are only insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation up to $250,000. Each unitholder should independently assess the creditworthiness of Bank of America, N.A. For more information about the credit rating of Bank of America, N.A., please refer to its periodic filings with the SEC. The trust does not lend money and has limited ability to borrow money, which the trustee believes limits the trust’s risk from the current tightening of credit markets. The trust’s future royalty income, however, may be subject to risks relating to the creditworthiness of the operators of the underlying properties and other purchasers of crude oil and natural gas produced from the underlying properties, as well as risks associated with fluctuations in the price of crude oil and natural gas. See “Item 1A — Risk Factors — Cash held by the trustee is not fully insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, and future royalty income may be subject to risks relating to the creditworthiness of third parties.” Information contained in Bank of America, N.A.’s periodic filings with the SEC is not incorporated by reference into this quarterly report on Form 10-Q and should not be considered part of this report or any other filing that the trust makes with the SEC.

Item 4.

Controls and Procedures.

As of the end of the period covered by this report, the trustee carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of the trust’s disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Exchange Act Rules 13a-15 and 15d-15. Based upon that evaluation, the trustee concluded that the trust’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective in recording, processing, summarizing and reporting, on a timely basis, information required to be disclosed by the trust in the reports that it files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and are effective in ensuring that information required to be disclosed by the trust in the reports that it files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is accumulated and communicated to the trustee to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In its evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures, the trustee has relied, to the extent considered reasonable, on information provided by XTO Energy. There has not been any change in the trust’s internal control over financial reporting during the period covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the trust’s internal control over financial reporting.

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.

Not applicable.

Item 1A. Risk Factors.

Except as set forth below, there have been no material changes in the risk factors disclosed under Part I, Item 1A of the trust’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.

Cash held by the trustee is not fully insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, and future royalty income may be subject to risks relating to the creditworthiness of third parties.

Currently, cash held by the trustee as a reserve for liabilities and for the payment of expenses and distributions to unitholders is invested in Bank of America, N.A. certificates of deposit which are backed by the good faith and credit of Bank of America, N.A., but are only insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation up to $250,000. Each unitholder should independently assess the creditworthiness of Bank of America, N.A. For more information about the credit rating of Bank of America, N.A., please refer to its periodic filings with the SEC. The trust does not lend money and has limited ability to borrow money, which the trustee believes limits the trust’s risk from the current tightening of credit markets. The trust’s future royalty income, however, may be subject to risks relating to the creditworthiness of the operators of the underlying properties and other purchasers of crude oil and natural gas produced from the underlying properties, as well as risks associated with fluctuations in the price of crude oil and natural gas. Information contained in Bank of America, N.A.’s periodic filings with the SEC is not incorporated by reference into this quarterly report on Form 10-Q and should not be considered part of this report or any other filing that the trust makes with the SEC.

Items 2 through 5.

Not applicable.

Item 6.

Exhibits.

(a)

Exhibits.

Exhibit Number

and Description

(15)

Awareness letter of KPMG LLP

(31)

Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification

(32)

Section 1350 Certification

(99)

Items 1A, 7 and 7A to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for Hugoton Royalty Trust filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 25, 2009 (incorporated herein by reference)

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

	HUGOTON ROYALTY TRUST
	By BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., TRUSTEE


	By	/s/ Nancy G. Willis
		Nancy G. Willis
		Vice President


	XTO ENERGY INC.


Date: July 21, 2009	By	/s/ Louis G. Baldwin
		Louis G. Baldwin
		Executive Vice President
		and Chief Financial Officer