HUGOTON ROYALTY TRUST - Quarter Report: 2018 September (Form 10-Q)
Table of Contents
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-Q
☒ | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2018
OR
☐ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
Commission File Number: 1-10476
Hugoton Royalty Trust
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Texas | 58-6379215 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
c/o The Corporate Trustee:
Simmons Bank
2911 Turtle Creek Blvd, Suite 850
Dallas, Texas 75219
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
(855) 588-7839
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
NONE
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if change since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☒ No ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). Yes ☐ No ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of large accelerated filer, accelerated filer, smaller reporting company, and emerging growth company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act (check one):
Large accelerated filer | ☐ | Accelerated filer | ☒ | |||
Non-accelerated filer | ☐ | Smaller reporting company | ☒ | |||
Emerging growth company | ☐ |
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 12b-2). Yes ☐ No ☒
Indicate the number of units of beneficial interest outstanding, as of the latest practicable date:
Outstanding as of November 1, 2018
40,000,000
Table of Contents
Table of Contents
HUGOTON ROYALTY TRUST
The following are definitions of significant terms used in this Form 10-Q:
Bbl |
Barrel (of oil) |
Mcf |
Thousand cubic feet (of natural gas) |
MMBtu |
One million British Thermal Units, a common energy measurement |
net proceeds |
Gross proceeds received by XTO Energy from sale of production from the underlying properties, less applicable costs, as defined in the net profits interest conveyances |
net profits income |
Net proceeds multiplied by the net profits percentage of 80%, which is paid to the Trust by XTO Energy. Net profits income is referred to as royalty income for income tax purposes. |
net profits interest |
An interest in an oil and gas property measured by net profits from the sale of production, rather than a specific portion of production. The following defined net profits interests were conveyed to the Trust from the underlying properties: |
80% net profits interestsinterests that entitle the Trust to receive 80% of the net proceeds from the underlying properties. |
underlying properties |
XTO Energys interest in certain oil and gas properties from which the net profits interests were conveyed. The underlying properties include working interests in predominantly gas-producing properties located in Kansas, Oklahoma and Wyoming. |
working interest |
An operating interest in an oil and gas property that provides the owner a specified share of production that is subject to all production expense and development costs |
3
Table of Contents
HUGOTON ROYALTY TRUST
PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements.
The condensed financial statements included herein are presented, without audit, pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in annual financial statements have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations, although the Trustee believes that the disclosures are adequate to make the information presented not misleading. These condensed financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and the notes thereto included in the Trusts latest Annual Report on Form 10-K. In the opinion of the Trustee, all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair statement of the assets, liabilities and trust corpus of the Hugoton Royalty Trust at September 30, 2018 and the distributable income and changes in trust corpus for the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2018 and 2017 have been included. Distributable income for such interim periods is not necessarily indicative of the distributable income for the full year. The condensed financial statements as of September 30, 2018, and for the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2018 and 2017 have been subjected to a review by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, the Trusts independent registered public accounting firm, whose report is included herein.
4
Table of Contents
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Unitholders of Hugoton Royalty Trust and
Simmons Bank, Trustee:
Results of Review of Financial Statements
We have reviewed the accompanying condensed statement of assets, liabilities and trust corpus of Hugoton Royalty Trust (the Trust) as of September 30, 2018, and the related condensed statements of distributable income and of changes in trust corpus for the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, including the related notes (collectively referred to as the interim financial statements). Based on our reviews, we are not aware of any material modifications that should be made to the accompanying interim financial statements for them to be in conformity with the modified cash basis of accounting described in Note 1.
We have previously audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the statements of assets, liabilities and trust corpus as of December 31, 2017, and the related statements of distributable income and of changes in trust corpus for the year then ended (not presented herein), and in our report dated March 12, 2018, which included a paragraph describing the modified cash basis of accounting, we expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements. In our opinion, the information set forth in the accompanying condensed statement of assets, liabilities and trust corpus as of December 31, 2017, is fairly stated, in all material respects, in relation to the statements of assets, liabilities and trust corpus from which it has been derived.
Basis for Review Results
These interim financial statements are the responsibility of the Trusts management. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Trust in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB. We conducted our review in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. A review of interim financial information consists principally of applying analytical procedures and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and accounting matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB, the objective of which is the expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.
Basis of Accounting
As described in Note 1, these financial statements were prepared on the modified cash basis of accounting, which is a comprehensive basis of accounting other than accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Dallas, TX
November 6, 2018
5
Table of Contents
HUGOTON ROYALTY TRUST
Condensed Statements of Assets, Liabilities and Trust Corpus (Unaudited)
September 30, 2018 |
December 31, 2017 |
|||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||
Cash and short-term investments |
$ | 1,351,705 | $ | 1,433,640 | ||||
Net profits interests in oil and gas properties - net (Note 1) |
15,816,990 | 16,379,749 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
$ | 17,168,695 | $ | 17,813,389 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
LIABILITIES AND TRUST CORPUS |
||||||||
Distribution payable to unitholders |
$ | | $ | 433,640 | ||||
Expense reserve (a) |
1,351,705 | 1,000,000 | ||||||
Trust corpus (40,000,000 units of beneficial interest authorized and outstanding) |
15,816,990 | 16,379,749 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
$ | 17,168,695 | $ | 17,813,389 | |||||
|
|
|
|
(a) | The expense reserve allows the Trustee to pay its obligations should it be unable to pay them out of the net profits income. The Trustee increased the expense reserve in light of the activity described in Note 2 and Note 4 to Condensed Financial Statements. |
The accompanying notes to condensed financial statements are an integral part of these statements.
6
Table of Contents
HUGOTON ROYALTY TRUST
Condensed Statements of Distributable Income (Unaudited)
Three Months Ended September 30 |
Nine Months Ended September 30 |
|||||||||||||||
2018 | 2017 | 2018 | 2017 | |||||||||||||
Net profits income |
$ | | $ | 688,252 | $ | 1,590,949 | $ | 4,236,724 | ||||||||
Interest income |
6,700 | 2,091 | 16,455 | 4,616 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total income |
6,700 | 690,343 | 1,607,404 | 4,241,340 | ||||||||||||
Administration expense |
225,204 | 193,023 | 885,659 | 707,060 | ||||||||||||
Cash reserves withheld (used) for Trust expenses |
(218,504 | ) | | 351,705 | | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Distributable income |
$ | | $ | 497,320 | $ | 370,040 | $ | 3,534,280 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Distributable income per unit (40,000,000 units) |
$ | 0.000000 | $ | 0.012433 | $ | 0.009251 | $ | 0.088357 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes to condensed financial statements are an integral part of these statements.
7
Table of Contents
HUGOTON ROYALTY TRUST
Condensed Statements of Changes in Trust Corpus (Unaudited)
Three Months Ended September 30 |
Nine Months Ended September 30 |
|||||||||||||||
2018 | 2017 | 2018 | 2017 | |||||||||||||
Trust corpus, beginning of period |
$ | 15,816,990 | $ | 20,063,091 | $ | 16,379,749 | $ | 26,885,503 | ||||||||
Amortization of net profits interests |
| (1,480,209 | ) | (562,759 | ) | (8,302,621 | ) | |||||||||
Distributable income |
| 497,320 | 370,040 | 3,534,280 | ||||||||||||
Distributions declared |
| (497,320 | ) | (370,040 | ) | (3,534,280 | ) | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Trust corpus, end of period |
$ | 15,816,990 | $ | 18,582,882 | $ | 15,816,990 | $ | 18,582,882 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes to condensed financial statements are an integral part of these statements.
8
Table of Contents
HUGOTON ROYALTY TRUST
Notes to Condensed Financial Statements (Unaudited)
1. | Basis of Accounting |
The financial statements of Hugoton Royalty Trust (the Trust) are prepared on the following basis and are not intended to present financial position and results of operations in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP):
- | Net profits income recorded for a month is the amount computed and paid by XTO Energy Inc., the owner of the underlying properties, to Simmons Bank, as trustee (the Trustee) for the Trust. XTO Energy is a wholly owned subsidiary of Exxon Mobil Corporation. Net profits income consists of net proceeds received by XTO Energy from the underlying properties in the prior month, multiplied by a net profits percentage of 80%. |
- | Costs deducted in the calculation of net proceeds for the 80% net profits interests generally include applicable taxes, transportation, marketing and legal costs, production expense, development costs, operating charges and other costs. |
- | Net profits income is computed separately for each of the three conveyances under which the net profits interests were conveyed to the Trust. If monthly costs exceed revenues for any conveyance, such excess costs must be recovered, with accrued interest, from future net proceeds of that conveyance and cannot reduce net proceeds from the other conveyances. |
- | Interest income and distribution payable to unitholders include interest earned on the previous months investment. |
- | Trust expenses are recorded based on liabilities paid and cash reserves established by the Trustee for liabilities and contingencies. |
- | Distributions to unitholders are recorded when declared by the Trustee. |
The Trusts financial statements differ from those prepared in conformity with U.S. GAAP because revenues are recognized when received rather than accrued in the month of production, expenses are recognized when paid rather than when incurred and certain cash reserves may be established by the Trustee for contingencies which would not be recorded under U.S. GAAP. This comprehensive basis of accounting other than U.S. GAAP corresponds to the accounting permitted for royalty trusts by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, as specified by Staff Accounting Bulletin Topic 12:E, Financial Statements of Royalty Trusts.
Most accounting pronouncements apply to entities whose financial statements are prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP, directing such entities to accrue or defer revenues and expenses in a period other than when such revenues were received or expenses were paid. Because the Trusts financial statements are prepared on the modified cash basis, as described above, most accounting pronouncements are not applicable to the Trusts financial statements.
9
Table of Contents
Impairment of Net Profits Interest
The Trustee reviews the Trusts net profits interests (NPI) in oil and gas properties for impairment whenever events or circumstances indicate that the carrying value of the NPI may not be recoverable. In general, the Trustee does not view temporarily low prices as an indication of impairment. The markets for crude oil and natural gas have a history of significant price volatility and though prices will occasionally drop significantly, industry prices over the long term will continue to be driven by market supply and demand. If events and circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable, the Trustee would use the estimated undiscounted future net cash flows from the NPI to evaluate the recoverability of the Trust assets. If the undiscounted future net cash flows from the NPI are less than the NPI carrying value, the Trust would recognize an impairment loss for the difference between the NPI carrying value and the estimated fair value of the NPI. The determination as to whether the NPI is impaired requires a significant amount of judgment by the Trustee and is based on the best information available to the Trustee at the time of the evaluation. During the quarter ended September 30, 2018, excess costs on properties attributable to the NPI have continued to accumulate, primarily due to the increase in the development budget for the active drilling of four horizontal wells in Major County, Oklahoma, with completion currently scheduled for early 2019 (see Note 5 to Condensed Financial Statements).There was no impairment of the NPI during the quarter ended September 30, 2018.
Net profits interests in oil and gas properties
The initial carrying value of the net profits interests of $247,066,951 represents XTO Energys historical net book value for the interests on December 1, 1998, the date of the transfer to the Trust. During the second quarter 2016, the carrying value of the NPI was written down to its fair value of $28,801,000, resulting in an impairment of $57,306,527 charged directly to trust corpus. Amortization of the net profits interests is calculated on a unit-of-production basis and charged directly to trust corpus. Accumulated amortization was $173,943,434 as of September 30, 2018 and $173,380,675 as of December 31, 2017.
2. | Development Costs |
The following summarizes actual development costs, budgeted development costs deducted in the calculation of net profits income, and the cumulative actual costs compared to the amount deducted for the underlying properties:
Three Months Ended September 30 |
Nine Months Ended September 30 |
|||||||||||||||
2018 | 2017 | 2018 | 2017 | |||||||||||||
Cumulative actual costs under (over) the amount deducted - beginning of period |
$ | 5,641,612 | $ | (83,055 | ) | $ | 537,144 | $ | 56,243 | |||||||
Actual costs |
(975,300 | ) | (434,911 | ) | (3,273,332 | ) | (1,774,209 | ) | ||||||||
Budgeted costs deducted |
6,562,500 | 760,000 | 13,965,000 | 1,960,000 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Cumulative actual costs under (over) the amount deducted - end of period |
$ | 11,228,812 | $ | 242,034 | $ | 11,228,812 | $ | 242,034 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The monthly deduction is based on the current level of development expenditures, budgeted future development costs and the cumulative actual costs under (over) previous deductions. XTO Energy has advised the Trustee that 2018 budgeted development costs for the underlying properties are between $25 million and $30 million. The 2018 budget year generally coincides with the Trust distribution months from April 2018 through
10
Table of Contents
March 2019. Changes in oil or natural gas prices could impact future development plans on the underlying properties. XTO Energy has advised the Trustee that this monthly deduction will continue to be evaluated and revised as necessary.
3. | Income Taxes |
For federal income tax purposes, the Trust constitutes a fixed investment trust that is taxed as a grantor trust. A grantor trust is not subject to tax at the trust level. Accordingly, no provision for income taxes has been made in the financial statements. The unitholders are considered to own the Trusts income and principal as though no trust were in existence. The income of the Trust is deemed to have been received or accrued by each unitholder at the time such income is received or accrued by the Trust and not when distributed by the Trust. Impairments recorded for book purposes will not result in a loss for tax purposes for the unitholders until the loss is recognized.
All revenues from the Trust are from sources within Kansas, Oklahoma or Wyoming. Because it distributes all of its net income to unitholders, the Trust has not been taxed at the trust level in Kansas or Oklahoma. While the Trust has not owed tax, the Trustee is generally required to file Kansas and Oklahoma income tax returns reflecting the income and deductions of the Trust attributable to properties located in each state, along with a schedule that includes information regarding distributions to unitholders. However, the Trust does not expect to file a Kansas income tax return for the 2018 tax year because it expects to have no revenues, income or deductions in 2018 attributable to properties located in Kansas. The Trust did not file a Kansas income tax return for the 2017 and 2016 tax years for the same reason.
Wyoming does not impose a state income tax.
The Trust could potentially be required to bear a portion of the legal settlement costs arising from the Chieftain settlement. For information on contingencies, see Note 4 to Condensed Financial Statements. In the event that the Trust is determined to be responsible for such costs, XTO will deduct the costs in its calculation of the net profits income payable to the Trust from the applicable net profits interests. Thus, for unitholders, the legal settlement costs will be reflected through a reduction in net profits income received from the Trust and thus in a reduction in the gross royalty income reported by and taxable to the unitholders. In the event that the Trustee objects to such claimed reductions, the Trustee may also incur legal fees in representing the Trusts interests. For unitholders, such costs would be reflected through an increase in the Trusts administrative expenses, which would be deductible by unitholders in determining the net royalty income from the Trust.
Each unitholder should consult his or her own tax advisor regarding income tax requirements, if any, applicable to such persons ownership of Trust units.
Unitholders should consult the Trusts latest annual report on Form 10-K for a more detailed discussion of federal and state tax matters.
4. | Contingencies |
In December 2010, a royalty class action lawsuit was filed against XTO Energy styled Chieftain Royalty Company v. XTO Energy Inc. in Coal County District Court, Oklahoma. XTO Energy removed the case to federal court in the Eastern District of Oklahoma. The plaintiffs allege that XTO Energy wrongfully deducted fees from royalty payments on Oklahoma wells, failed to make diligent efforts to secure the best terms available for the sale of gas and its constituents, and demanded an accounting to determine whether they have been fully and fairly paid gas royalty interests. The case was certified as a class action in April 2012, then decertified in July 2013.
11
Table of Contents
XTO Energy advised the Trustee that in December 2017, it reached a tentative settlement with the plaintiffs for $80 million and an additional $750 thousand for costs to administer the settlement following final approval. In March 2018, XTO Energy advised the Trustee that it believed the portion of the settlement that relates to the Trust could be as much as $20 million, but the settlement allocable to the Trust could not be finally determined until after the judge approved the plaintiffs final plan of allocation. On July 27, 2018, plaintiffs submitted their final plan of allocation which was approved by the court on the same date. Based on the final plan of allocation XTO Energy has advised the Trustee that it believes approximately $24.3 million in additional production costs should be allocated to the Trust. On May 2, 2018, the Trustee submitted a demand for arbitration styled Simmons Bank (successor to Southwest Bank and Bank of America, N.A.) vs. XTO Energy Inc. (the Arbitration) through the American Arbitration Association seeking a declaratory judgment that the Chieftain settlement is not a production cost and that XTO Energy is prohibited from charging the settlement as a production cost under the conveyance or otherwise reducing the Trusts payments now or in the future as a result of the Chieftain litigation. In the Arbitration, the Trustee also made claims for disputed amounts on the computation of the Trusts net proceeds for 2014 through 2016 in excess of $5 million. XTO Energy filed its answer denying the Trustees claims. The Arbitration panel has been selected. Claims related to the Chieftain settlement are tentatively scheduled for a final hearing beginning in March 2019. The remaining claims related to the computation of the Trusts net proceeds were bifurcated and will be heard at a later date, which is still to be determined.
If the approximately $24.3 million allocated portion of the Chieftain settlement results in an adjustment to the Trusts share of net proceeds, it would result in additional excess costs under the Oklahoma conveyance that would likely result in no distributions under the Oklahoma conveyance for several years while these additional excess costs are recovered.
Certain of the underlying properties are involved in various other lawsuits and governmental proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business. XTO Energy has advised the Trustee that it does not believe that the ultimate resolution of these claims will have a material effect on the financial position or liquidity of the Trust, but may have an effect on annual distributable income.
Other
Several states have enacted legislation requiring state income tax withholding from payments made to nonresident recipients of oil and gas proceeds. After consultation with its tax counsel, the Trustee believes that it is not required to withhold on payments made to the unitholders. However, regulations are subject to change by the various states, which could change this conclusion. Should amounts be withheld on payments made to the Trust or the unitholders, distributions to the unitholders would be reduced by the required amount, subject to the filing of a claim for refund by the Trust or unitholders for such amount.
5. | Excess Costs |
If monthly costs exceed revenues for any conveyance, such excess costs must be recovered, with accrued interest, from future net proceeds of that conveyance and cannot reduce net proceeds from other conveyances.
12
Table of Contents
The following summarizes excess costs activity, cumulative excess costs balance and accrued interest to be recovered by conveyance:
Underlying | ||||||||||||||||
KS | OK | WY | Total | |||||||||||||
Cumulative excess costs remaining at 12/31/17 |
$ | 771,556 | $ | | $ | | $ | 771,556 | ||||||||
Net excess costs (recovery) for the quarter ended 3/31/18 |
72,191 | | 32,365 | 104,556 | ||||||||||||
Net excess costs (recovery) for the quarter ended 6/30/18 |
20,283 | 4,665,654 | 486,350 | 5,172,287 | ||||||||||||
Net excess costs (recovery) for the quarter ended 9/30/18 |
90,361 | 5,145,818 | 481,526 | 5,717,705 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Cumulative excess costs remaining at 9/30/18 |
954,391 | 9,811,472 | 1,000,241 | 11,766,104 | ||||||||||||
Accrued interest at 9/30/18 (a) |
146,901 | | 11,042 | 157,943 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total remaining to be recovered at 9/30/18 |
$ | 1,101,292 | $ | 9,811,472 | $ | 1,011,283 | $ | 11,924,047 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NPI | ||||||||||||||||
KS | OK | WY | Total | |||||||||||||
Cumulative excess costs remaining at 12/31/17 |
$ | 617,246 | $ | | $ | | $ | 617,246 | ||||||||
Net excess costs (recovery) for the quarter ended 3/31/18 |
57,752 | | 25,892 | 83,644 | ||||||||||||
Net excess costs (recovery) for the quarter ended 6/30/18 |
16,226 | 3,732,523 | 389,080 | 4,137,829 | ||||||||||||
Net excess costs (recovery) for the quarter ended 9/30/18 |
72,289 | 4,116,655 | 385,221 | 4,574,165 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Cumulative excess costs remaining at 9/30/18 |
763,513 | 7,849,178 | 800,193 | 9,412,884 | ||||||||||||
Accrued interest at 9/30/18 (a) |
117,521 | | 8,833 | 126,354 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total remaining to be recovered at 9/30/18 |
$ | 881,034 | $ | 7,849,178 | $ | 809,026 | $ | 9,539,238 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) | XTO has advised the Trustee that it has determined not to accrue interest on the OK excess costs balance at this time. |
For the quarter ended September 30, 2018, lower gas prices in relation to costs resulted in net excess costs on properties underlying the Kansas net profits interests. Increased budgeted development costs caused costs to exceed revenues on properties underlying the Oklahoma net profits interests. Lower gas prices and increased budgeted development costs caused costs to exceed revenues on properties underlying the Wyoming net profits interests.
Underlying cumulative excess costs for the Kansas, Oklahoma and Wyoming conveyances remaining as of September 30, 2018 totaled $11.9 million, including accrued interest of $0.2 million.
Item 2. Trustees Discussion and Analysis.
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the Trustees discussion and analysis contained in the Trusts 2017 Annual Report on Form 10-K, as well as the condensed financial statements and notes thereto included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. The Trusts Annual Report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and all amendments to those reports are available on the Trusts web site at www.hgt-hugoton.com.
13
Table of Contents
Distributable Income
Quarter
For the quarter ended September 30, 2018, net profits income was $0, as compared to $688,252 for third quarter 2017. This 100% decrease in net profits income is primarily the result of increased budgeted development costs ($4.6 million), lower gas prices ($1.0 million), lower gas and oil production ($0.5 million), increased production expense ($0.3 million) and increased taxes, transportation and other costs ($0.1 million), partially offset by net excess costs activity ($5.0 million), and higher oil prices ($0.8 million). See Net Profits Income below.
After adding interest income of $6,700 and deducting administration expense of $225,204, and reducing the cash reserve $218,504 for the payment of trust expenses, distributable income for the quarter ended September 30, 2018 was $0, or $0.000000 per unit of beneficial interest. Administration expense for the quarter increased $32,181 as compared to the prior year quarter, primarily related to an increase in legal fees and the timing of receipt and payment of Trust expenses and terms of professional services. Changes in interest income are attributable to fluctuations in net profits income and interest rates. For third quarter 2017, distributable income was $497,320, or $0.012433 per unit.
Distributions to unitholders for the quarter ended September 30, 2018 were:
Record Date |
Payment Date |
Distribution per Unit | ||||
July 31, 2018 |
August 14, 2018 | $ | 0.000000 | |||
August 31, 2018 |
September 17, 2018 | 0.000000 | ||||
September 28, 2018 |
October 15, 2018 | 0.000000 | ||||
|
|
|||||
$ | 0.000000 | |||||
|
|
Nine Months
For the nine months ended September 30, 2018, net profits income was $1,590,949 compared with $4,236,724 for the same 2017 period. This 62% decrease in net profits income is primarily the result of increased budgeted development costs ($9.6 million), lower gas prices ($2.0 million), decreased gas production ($1.7 million), and increased production expenses ($0.7 million), partially offset by net excess costs activity ($9.8 million), higher oil prices ($1.4 million), and increased oil production ($0.1 million), and decreased taxes, transportation and other costs ($0.1 million). See Net Profits Income below.
After adding interest income of $16,455 and deducting administration expense of $885,659, and increasing the expense reserve by $351,705, distributable income for the nine months ended September 30, 2018 was $370,040, or $0.009251 per unit of beneficial interest. Administration expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2018 increased $178,599 as compared to the same 2017 period, primarily related to an increase in legal fees. Changes in interest income are attributable to fluctuations in net profits income and interest rates. For the nine months ended September 30, 2017, distributable income was $3,534,280, or $0.088357 per unit.
14
Table of Contents
Net Profits Income
Net profits income is recorded when received by the Trust, which is the month following receipt by XTO Energy, and generally two months after oil and gas production. Net profits income is generally affected by three major factors:
- | oil and gas sales volumes, |
- | oil and gas sales prices, and |
- | costs deducted in the calculation of net profits income. |
15
Table of Contents
The following is a summary of the calculation of net profits income received by the Trust:
Three Months Ended September 30 (a) |
Increase (Decrease) |
Nine Months Ended September 30 (a) |
Increase (Decrease) |
|||||||||||||||||||||
2018 | 2017 | 2018 | 2017 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Sales Volumes |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gas (Mcf) (b) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Underlying properties |
3,337,746 | 3,557,852 | (6 | %) | 9,729,237 | 10,497,894 | (7 | %) | ||||||||||||||||
Average per day |
36,280 | 38,672 | (6 | %) | 35,638 | 38,454 | (7 | %) | ||||||||||||||||
Net profits interests |
| 229,435 | (100 | %) | 447,961 | 1,286,934 | (65 | %) | ||||||||||||||||
Oil (Bbls) (b) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Underlying properties |
39,525 | 40,990 | (4 | %) | 120,668 | 119,291 | 1 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Average per day |
430 | 446 | (4 | %) | 442 | 437 | 1 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Net profits interests |
| 4,000 | (100 | %) | 7,627 | 21,221 | (64 | %) | ||||||||||||||||
Average Sales Prices |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gas (per Mcf) |
$ | 2.47 | $ | 2.81 | (12 | %) | $ | 2.69 | $ | 2.94 | (9 | %) | ||||||||||||
Oil (per Bbl) |
$ | 66.86 | $ | 43.96 | 52 | % | $ | 61.17 | $ | 46.29 | 32 | % | ||||||||||||
Revenues |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gas sales |
$ | 8,249,425 | $ | 10,006,965 | (18 | %) | $ | 26,198,075 | $ | 30,827,132 | (15 | %) | ||||||||||||
Oil sales |
2,642,696 | 1,801,955 | 47 | % | 7,380,763 | 5,521,410 | 34 | % | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Total Revenues |
10,892,121 | 11,808,920 | (8 | %) | 33,578,838 | 36,348,542 | (8 | %) | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Costs |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Taxes, transportation and other |
2,166,680 | 2,079,613 | 4 | % | 6,118,432 | 6,269,314 | (2 | %) | ||||||||||||||||
Production expense |
4,942,127 | 4,618,468 | 7 | % | 13,781,997 | 12,934,692 | 7 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Development costs (c) |
6,562,500 | 760,000 | 763 | % | 13,965,000 | 1,960,000 | 613 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Overhead |
2,938,519 | 2,961,087 | (1 | %) | 8,719,270 | 8,650,612 | 1 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Excess costs (d) |
(5,717,705 | ) | 529,437 | N/A | (10,994,547 | ) | 1,238,019 | N/A | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Total Costs |
10,892,121 | 10,948,605 | (1 | %) | 31,590,152 | 31,052,637 | 2 | % | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Net Proceeds |
| 860,315 | (100 | %) | 1,988,686 | 5,295,905 | (62 | %) | ||||||||||||||||
Net Profits Percentage |
80% | 80% | 80% | 80% | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Net Profits Income |
$ | | $ | 688,252 | (100 | %) | $ | 1,590,949 | $ | 4,236,724 | (62 | %) | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) | Because of the two-month interval between time of production and receipt of net profits income by the Trust, (1) gas and oil sales for the quarter ended September 30 generally represent production for the period May through July and (2) gas and oil sales for the nine months ended September 30 generally represent production for the period November through July. |
(b) | Gas and oil sales volumes are allocated to the net profits interests by dividing Trust net cash inflows by average sales prices. As gas and oil prices change, the Trusts allocated production volumes are impacted as the quantity of production necessary to cover expenses changes inversely with price. As such, the underlying property production volume changes may not correlate with the Trusts allocated production volumes in any given period. Therefore, comparative discussion of gas and oil sales volumes is based on the underlying properties. |
(c) | See Note 2 to Condensed Financial Statements. |
(d) | See Note 5 to Condensed Financial Statements. |
16
Table of Contents
The following are explanations of significant variances on the underlying properties from third quarter 2017 to third quarter 2018 and from the first nine months of 2017 to the comparable period in 2018:
Sales Volumes
Gas
Gas sales volumes decreased 6% for the third quarter and 7% for the nine-month period primarily because of natural production decline.
Oil
Oil sales volumes decreased 4% for the third quarter and increased 1% for the nine-month period primarily because of natural production decline and the timing of cash receipts.
The estimated rate of natural production decline on the underlying oil and gas properties is approximately 6% to 8% a year.
Sales Prices
Gas
The third quarter 2018 average gas price was $2.47 per Mcf, a 12% decrease from the third quarter 2017 average gas price of $2.81 per Mcf. For the nine-month period, the average gas price decreased 9% to $2.69 per Mcf in 2018 from $2.94 per Mcf in 2017. The third quarter 2018 gas price is primarily related to production from May through July 2018, when the average NYMEX price was $2.90 per MMBtu.
Oil
The third quarter 2018 average oil price was $66.86 per Bbl, a 52% increase from the third quarter 2017 average oil price of $43.96 per Bbl. For the nine-month period, the average oil price increased 32% to $61.17 per Bbl in 2018 from $46.29 per Bbl in 2017. The third quarter 2018 oil price is primarily related to production from May through July 2018, when the average NYMEX price was $69.36 per Bbl.
Costs
Taxes, Transportation and Other
Taxes, transportation and other costs increased 4% for the third quarter primarily because of increased gas deductions related to additional gathering fees and increased production taxes related to higher oil revenues, partially offset by decreased production taxes related to lower gas revenues. Taxes, transportation and other costs decreased 2% for the nine-month period primarily because of decreased production taxes related to lower gas revenues and decreased property taxes, partially offset by increased gas deductions related to additional gathering fees and increased production taxes related to higher oil revenues.
Production Expense
Production expense increased 7% for the third quarter primarily because of increased repairs and maintenance, partially offset by decreased field goods and services and environmental costs. Production expense increased 7% for the nine-month period primarily because of increased repairs and maintenance, partially offset by decreased other field goods and services and environmental costs.
17
Table of Contents
Development Costs
Development costs deducted are based on the current level of development expenditures, budgeted future development costs and the cumulative actual costs under (over) previous deductions. These development costs increased 763% for the third quarter and 613% for the nine-month period, primarily due to the increase in the development budget for the active drilling of four horizontal wells in Major County, Oklahoma, with completion currently scheduled for early 2019. The monthly development cost deduction will be reevaluated by XTO Energy and revised as necessary. For further information on development costs, see Note 2 to Condensed Financial Statements.
Overhead
Overhead decreased 1% for the third quarter and increased 1% for the nine-month period. Overhead is charged by XTO Energy for administrative expenses incurred to support operations of the underlying properties. Overhead fluctuates based on changes in the active well count and drilling activity on the underlying properties, as well as an annual cost level adjustment based on an industry index.
Excess Costs
If monthly costs exceed revenues for any conveyance, these excess costs must be recovered, with accrued interest, from future net proceeds of that conveyance and cannot reduce net profits income from another conveyance. Underlying cumulative excess costs for the Kansas, Oklahoma and Wyoming conveyances remaining as of September 30, 2018 totaled $11.9 million ($9.5 million NPI), including accrued interest of $0.2 million ($0.1 million NPI). For further information on excess costs, see Note 5 to Condensed Financial Statements.
Marketing
XTO Energy has advised the Trustee that, effective April 1, 2017, Cross Timbers Energy Services, Inc. (CTES), a wholly owned marketing subsidiary of XTO Energy, has assigned all gas sales contracts for production from the underlying properties to XTO Energy. XTO Energy sells gas directly to third parties. XTO Energy has advised the Trustee that there are no changes to the terms of the contracts related to the assignment and no impact on Trust distributions.
For further information regarding natural gas sales from the underlying properties to affiliates of XTO Energy, see Significant Properties, under Item 2, Properties and Note 7 to the Financial Statements under Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data of the Trusts Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017.
Contingencies
For information on contingencies, see Note 4 to Condensed Financial Statements.
Forward-Looking Statements
Statements in this report relating to future plans, predictions, events, or regulatory or court decisions are forward-looking statements. All statements other than statements of historical fact included in this Form 10-Q, including, without limitation, statements regarding the net profits interests, underlying properties, development activities, annual and monthly development, production and other costs and expenses, monthly development cost deductions, oil and gas prices and differentials to NYMEX prices, supply levels, drilling, workover and re-stimulation plans, the outcome of litigation
18
Table of Contents
or settlement discussions and the impact on Trust proceeds, distributions to unitholders, and industry and market conditions, are forward-looking statements that are subject to risks and uncertainties, including those detailed in Part I, Item 1A of the Trusts Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017, which is incorporated by this reference as though fully set forth herein. XTO Energy and the Trustee assume no duty to update these statements as of any future date.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk.
Not applicable. Upon qualifying as a smaller reporting company, this information is no longer required.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures.
As of the end of the period covered by this report, the Trustee carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of the Trusts disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Exchange Act Rules 13a-15 and 15d-15. Based upon that evaluation, the Trustee concluded that the Trusts disclosure controls and procedures are effective in recording, processing, summarizing and reporting, on a timely basis, information required to be disclosed by the Trust in the reports that it files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and are effective in ensuring that information required to be disclosed by the Trust in the reports that it files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is accumulated and communicated to the Trustee to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In its evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures, the Trustee has relied, to the extent considered reasonable, on information provided by XTO Energy. There has not been any change in the Trusts internal control over financial reporting during the period covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Trusts internal control over financial reporting.
19
Table of Contents
PART II - OTHER INFORMATION
In December 2010, a royalty class action lawsuit was filed against XTO Energy styled Chieftain Royalty Company v. XTO Energy Inc. in Coal County District Court, Oklahoma. XTO Energy removed the case to federal court in the Eastern District of Oklahoma. The plaintiffs allege that XTO Energy wrongfully deducted fees from royalty payments on Oklahoma wells, failed to make diligent efforts to secure the best terms available for the sale of gas and its constituents, and demanded an accounting to determine whether they have been fully and fairly paid gas royalty interests. The case was certified as a class action in April 2012, then decertified in July 2013.
XTO Energy advised the Trustee that in December 2017, it reached a tentative settlement with the plaintiffs for $80 million and an additional $750 thousand for costs to administer the settlement following final approval. In March 2018, XTO Energy advised the Trustee that it believed the portion of the settlement that relates to the Trust could be as much as $20 million, but the settlement allocable to the Trust could not be finally determined until after the judge approved the plaintiffs final plan of allocation. On July 27, 2018, plaintiffs submitted their final plan of allocation which was approved by the court on the same date. Based on the final plan of allocation XTO Energy has advised the Trustee that it believes approximately $24.3 million in additional production costs should be allocated to the Trust. On May 2, 2018, the Trustee submitted a demand for arbitration styled Simmons Bank (successor to Southwest Bank and Bank of America, N.A.) vs. XTO Energy Inc. (the Arbitration) through the American Arbitration Association seeking a declaratory judgment that the Chieftain settlement is not a production cost and that XTO Energy is prohibited from charging the settlement as a production cost under the conveyance or otherwise reducing the Trusts payments now or in the future as a result of the Chieftain litigation. In the Arbitration, the Trustee also made claims for disputed amounts on the computation of the Trusts net proceeds for 2014 through 2016 in excess of $5 million. XTO Energy filed its answer denying the Trustees claims. The Arbitration panel has been selected. Claims related to the Chieftain settlement are tentatively scheduled for a final hearing beginning in March 2019. The remaining claims related to the computation of the Trusts net proceeds were bifurcated and will be heard at a later date, which is still to be determined.
If the approximately $24.3 million allocated portion of the Chieftain settlement results in an adjustment to the Trusts share of net proceeds, it would result in additional excess costs under the Oklahoma conveyance that would likely result in no distributions under the Oklahoma conveyance for several years while these additional excess costs are recovered.
Certain of the underlying properties are involved in various other lawsuits and governmental proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business. XTO Energy has advised the Trustee that it does not believe that the ultimate resolution of these claims will have a material effect on the financial position or liquidity of the Trust, but may have an effect on annual distributable income.
Higher production expense and/or development costs, without concurrent increases in revenue, will directly decrease the net proceeds payable to the Trust. Certain claimed production expenses by XTO Energy may reduce or eliminate distributions to unitholders for extended periods of time.
Production expense and development costs are deducted in the calculation of the Trusts share of net proceeds. Accordingly, higher or lower production expense and development costs, without concurrent changes in revenue, will directly decrease or increase the amount received by the Trust. If development costs and production expense for underlying properties in a particular state exceed the production proceeds from the
20
Table of Contents
properties (as was the case with respect to the properties underlying the Kansas net profits interest for all of 2016 and 2017, and the first three quarters of 2018, and with respect to the properties underlying the Wyoming net profits interests for all of 2016, the first three quarters of 2017, and the first three quarters of 2018, and with respect to the properties underlying the Oklahoma net profits interest, the second and third quarters of 2018), the Trust will not receive net profits income for those properties until future net proceeds from production in that state exceed the total of the excess costs plus accrued interest during the deficit period. Development activities may not generate sufficient additional revenue to repay the costs. Additionally, XTO Energy has advised the Trustee that total budgeted development costs for the underlying properties are between $25 million and $30 million for the period April 2018 through March 2019 which could continue to exceed revenues for the underlying conveyance. See Item 1 Financial Statements (Unaudited) Notes to Condensed Financial Statements Note 2 Development Costs for additional information.
As described in Note 4 Contingencies to the Notes to Financial Statements, XTO Energy has advised the Trustee that it believes a portion of the settlement it has reached in the Chieftain Royalty Company v. XTO Energy Inc. class action lawsuit relates to the Trust. On July 27, 2018, plaintiffs submitted their final plan of allocation which was approved by the court on the same date. XTO Energy has advised the Trustee that it believes approximately $24.3 million in additional production costs should be allocated to the Trust. The Trustee has submitted a demand for arbitration and the arbitration panel has been selected. Claims related to the Chieftain settlement are tentatively scheduled for a final hearing beginning in March 2019. The remaining claims related to the computation of the Trusts net proceeds were bifurcated and will be heard at a later date, which is still to be determined. If the approximately $24.3 million allocated portion of the Chieftain settlement results in an adjustment to the Trusts share of net proceeds, it would result in additional excess costs under the Oklahoma conveyance that would likely result in no distributions under the Oklahoma conveyance for several years while these additional excess costs are recovered. See Item 1 Financial Statements (Unaudited) Notes to Condensed Financial Statements Note 4 Contingencies for additional information.
There may not be an active market for the Trust units.
On August 27, 2018, the Trust units were delisted from the NYSE and began to be quoted on the OTCQX, which is maintained by the OTC Market Group Inc., under the symbol HGTXU. Trading on the OTCQX is often characterized as thin with sporadic fluctuations in price and the availability of buyers or sellers of a security. No assurance can be given that an active trading market for our Trust units will further develop or continue. The Trust units will likely be subject to greater volatility and lower trading volumes than when the Trust units were listed on the New York Stock Exchange. This could depress the trading price of the Trust units and make it more difficult to purchase, dispose of or obtain accurate quotations as to the value of the Trust units. We currently expect the Trust units will continue to trade on the OTCQX.
21
Table of Contents
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
HUGOTON ROYALTY TRUST By SIMMONS BANK, TRUSTEE | ||||||
By | /S/ NANCY WILLIS | |||||
Nancy Willis Vice President | ||||||
EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION | ||||||
Date: November 6, 2018 | By | /S/ DAVID LEVY | ||||
David Levy Vice President - Upstream Business Services |
22