HUGOTON ROYALTY TRUST - Quarter Report: 2019 September (Form 10-Q)
Table of Contents
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-Q
☒ | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2019
OR
☐ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
Commission File Number: 1-10476
Hugoton Royalty Trust
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Texas | 58-6379215 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
c/o The Corporate Trustee:
Simmons Bank
2911 Turtle Creek Blvd, Suite 850
Dallas, Texas 75219
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
(855) 588-7839
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
NONE
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if change since last report)
Title of each class |
Trading symbol |
Name of each exchange on which registered | ||
Units of Beneficial Interest | HGTXU | OTCQX |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☑ No ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). Yes ☐ No ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of large accelerated filer, accelerated filer, smaller reporting company, and emerging growth company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act:
Large accelerated filer | ☐ | Accelerated filer | ☐ | |||
Non-accelerated filer | ☑ | Smaller reporting company | ☑ | |||
Emerging growth company | ☐ |
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ☐ No ☑
Indicate the number of units of beneficial interest outstanding, as of the latest practicable date:
Outstanding as of November 1, 2019
40,000,000
Table of Contents
HUGOTON ROYALTY TRUST
FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2019
Page | ||||||
3 | ||||||
PART I. | ||||||
Item 1. |
4 | |||||
5 | ||||||
7 | ||||||
8 | ||||||
9 | ||||||
10 | ||||||
Item 2. |
15 | |||||
Item 3. |
21 | |||||
Item 4. |
21 | |||||
PART II. | ||||||
Item 1. |
22 | |||||
Item 1A. |
22 | |||||
Item 6. |
22 | |||||
23 |
2
Table of Contents
HUGOTON ROYALTY TRUST
The following are definitions of significant terms used in this Form 10-Q:
Bbl | Barrel (of oil) | |
Mcf | Thousand cubic feet (of natural gas) | |
MMBtu | One million British Thermal Units, a common energy measurement | |
net proceeds | Gross proceeds received by XTO Energy from sale of production from the underlying properties, less applicable costs, as defined in the net profits interest conveyances. | |
net profits income | Net proceeds multiplied by the net profits percentage of 80%, which is paid to the Trust by XTO Energy. Net profits income is referred to as royalty income for income tax purposes. | |
net profits interest | An interest in an oil and gas property measured by net profits from the sale of production, rather than a specific portion of production. The following defined net profits interests were conveyed to the Trust from the underlying properties: | |
80% net profits interests - interests that entitle the Trust to receive 80% of the net proceeds from the underlying properties. | ||
underlying properties | XTO Energys interest in certain oil and gas properties from which the net profits interests were conveyed. The underlying properties include working interests in predominantly gas-producing properties located in Kansas, Oklahoma and Wyoming. | |
working interest | An operating interest in an oil and gas property that provides the owner a specified share of production that is subject to all production expense and development costs. |
3
Table of Contents
HUGOTON ROYALTY TRUST
PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
The condensed financial statements included herein are presented, without audit, pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in annual financial statements have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations, although the Trustee believes that the disclosures are adequate to make the information presented not misleading. These condensed financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and the notes thereto included in the Trusts latest Annual Report on Form 10-K. In the opinion of the Trustee, all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair statement of the assets, liabilities and trust corpus of the Hugoton Royalty Trust at September 30, 2019 and the distributable income and changes in trust corpus for the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2019 and 2018 have been included. Distributable income for such interim periods is not necessarily indicative of the distributable income for the full year. The condensed financial statements as of September 30, 2019, and for the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2019 and 2018 have been subjected to a review by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, the Trusts independent registered public accounting firm, whose report is included herein.
4
Table of Contents
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Unitholders of Hugoton Royalty Trust and
Simmons Bank, Trustee:
Results of Review of Interim Financial Statements
We have reviewed the accompanying condensed statement of assets, liabilities and trust corpus of Hugoton Royalty Trust (the Trust) as of September 30, 2019, and the related condensed statements of distributable income and of changes in trust corpus for the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2019 and 2018, including the related notes (collectively referred to as the interim financial statements). Based on our reviews, we are not aware of any material modifications that should be made to the accompanying interim financial statements for them to be in conformity with the modified cash basis of accounting described in Note 1.
We have previously audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the statements of assets, liabilities and trust corpus as of December 31, 2018, and the related statements of distributable income and of changes in trust corpus for the year then ended (not presented herein), and in our report dated March 29, 2019, which included a paragraph describing the modified cash basis of accounting and a paragraph regarding substantial doubt about the Trusts ability to continue as a going concern, we expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements. In our opinion, the information set forth in the accompanying condensed statement of assets, liabilities and trust corpus as of December 31, 2018, is fairly stated, in all material respects, in relation to the statements of assets, liabilities and trust corpus from which it has been derived.
Basis for Review Results
These interim financial statements are the responsibility of the Trusts management. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Trust in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB. We conducted our review in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. A review of interim financial information consists principally of applying analytical procedures and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and accounting matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB, the objective of which is the expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.
Substantial Doubt about the Companys Ability to Continue as a Going Concern
The accompanying interim financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Trust will continue as a going concern. Note 2 of the Trusts audited financial statements as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, and for the years then ended, includes a statement that substantial doubt exists about the Trusts ability to continue as a going concern. Note 2 of the Trusts audited financial statements also discloses the events and conditions, managements evaluation of the events and conditions, and managements plans regarding these matters, including the fact that a reduction in net profits income as a result of excess costs have led to a decline to the expense reserve available to the Trust for the payment of its obligations. Our report on those financial statements includes a paragraph referring to the matters in Note 2 of those financial statements. As indicated in Note 1 of the accompanying interim financial statements, as of September 30, 2019, and for the three-months and nine-months then ended, the events and conditions impacting the Trust have not changed, and as a result, the Trust has stated that substantial doubt exists about the Trusts ability to continue as a going concern. The accompanying interim financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.
5
Table of Contents
Basis of Accounting
As described in Note 1, these financial statements were prepared on the modified cash basis of accounting, which is a comprehensive basis of accounting other than accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Dallas, Texas
November 14, 2019
6
Table of Contents
HUGOTON ROYALTY TRUST
Condensed Statements of Assets, Liabilities and Trust Corpus (Unaudited)
September 30, 2019 |
December 31, 2018 |
|||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||
Cash and short-term investments |
$ | 840,225 | $ | 1,128,157 | ||||
Net profits interests in oil and gas propertiesnet (Note 1) |
| 15,816,990 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
$ | 840,225 | $ | 16,945,147 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
LIABILITIES AND TRUST CORPUS |
||||||||
Distribution payable to unitholders |
$ | | $ | | ||||
Expense reserve (a) |
840,225 | 1,128,157 | ||||||
Trust corpus (40,000,000 units of beneficial interest authorized and outstanding) |
| 15,816,990 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
$ | 840,225 | $ | 16,945,147 | |||||
|
|
|
|
(a) | The expense reserve allows the Trustee to pay its obligations should it be unable to pay them out of the net profits income. |
The accompanying notes to condensed financial statements are an integral part of these statements.
7
Table of Contents
Condensed Statements of Distributable Income (Unaudited)
Three Months Ended September 30 |
Nine Months Ended September 30 |
|||||||||||||||
2019 | 2018 | 2019 | 2018 | |||||||||||||
Net profits income |
$ | | $ | | $ | 369,458 | $ | 1,590,949 | ||||||||
Interest income |
5,717 | 6,700 | 17,629 | 16,455 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total income |
5,717 | 6,700 | 387,087 | 1,607,404 | ||||||||||||
Administration expense |
236,691 | 225,204 | 675,019 | 885,659 | ||||||||||||
Cash reserves withheld (used) for Trust expenses |
(230,974 | ) | (218,504 | ) | (287,932 | ) | 351,705 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Distributable income |
$ | | $ | | $ | | $ | 370,040 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Distributable income per unit (40,000,000 units) |
$ | 0.000000 | $ | 0.000000 | $ | 0.000000 | $ | 0.009251 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes to condensed financial statements are an integral part of these statements.
8
Table of Contents
HUGOTON ROYALTY TRUST
Condensed Statements of Changes in Trust Corpus (Unaudited)
Three Months Ended September 30 |
Nine Months Ended September 30 |
|||||||||||||||
2019 | 2018 | 2019 | 2018 | |||||||||||||
Trust corpus, beginning of period |
$ | 15,681,533 | $ | 15,816,990 | $ | 15,816,990 | $ | 16,379,749 | ||||||||
Amortization of net profits interests |
| | (135,457 | ) | (562,759 | ) | ||||||||||
Impairment of net profits interest (Note 1) |
(15,681,533 | ) | | (15,681,533 | ) | | ||||||||||
Distributable income |
| | | 370,040 | ||||||||||||
Distributions declared |
| | | (370,040 | ) | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Trust corpus, end of period |
$ | | $ | 15,816,990 | $ | | $ | 15,816,990 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes to condensed financial statements are an integral part of these statements.
9
Table of Contents
HUGOTON ROYALTY TRUST
Notes to Condensed Financial Statements (Unaudited)
1. | Basis of Accounting |
The financial statements of Hugoton Royalty Trust (the Trust) are prepared on the following basis and are not intended to present financial position and results of operations in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP):
| Net profits income recorded for a month is the amount computed and paid by XTO Energy Inc., the owner of the underlying properties, to Simmons Bank, as trustee (the Trustee) for the Trust. XTO Energy is a wholly owned subsidiary of Exxon Mobil Corporation. Net profits income consists of net proceeds received by XTO Energy from the underlying properties in the prior month, multiplied by a net profits percentage of 80%. |
| Costs deducted in the calculation of net proceeds for the 80% net profits interests generally include applicable taxes, transportation, marketing and legal costs, production expense, development costs, operating charges and other costs. |
| Net profits income is computed separately for each of the three conveyances under which the net profits interests were conveyed to the Trust. If monthly costs exceed revenues for any conveyance, such excess costs must be recovered, with accrued interest, from future net proceeds of that conveyance and cannot reduce net proceeds from the other conveyances. |
| Interest income and distribution payable to unitholders include interest earned on the previous months investment. |
| Trust expenses are recorded based on liabilities paid and cash reserves established by the Trustee for liabilities and contingencies. |
| Distributions to unitholders are recorded when declared by the Trustee. |
The Trusts financial statements differ from those prepared in conformity with U.S. GAAP because revenues are recognized when received rather than accrued in the month of production, expenses are recognized when paid rather than when incurred and certain cash reserves may be established by the Trustee for contingencies which would not be recorded under U.S. GAAP. This comprehensive basis of accounting other than U.S. GAAP corresponds to the accounting permitted for royalty trusts by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, as specified by Staff Accounting Bulletin Topic 12:E, Financial Statements of Royalty Trusts.
Most accounting pronouncements apply to entities whose financial statements are prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP, directing such entities to accrue or defer revenues and expenses in a period other than when such revenues were received or expenses were paid. Because the Trusts financial statements are prepared on the modified cash basis, as described above, most accounting pronouncements are not applicable to the Trusts financial statements.
10
Table of Contents
Impairment of Net Profits Interest
The Trustee reviews the Trusts net profits interests (NPI) in oil and gas properties for impairment whenever events or circumstances indicate that the carrying value of the NPI may not be recoverable. In general, the Trustee does not view temporarily low prices as an indication of impairment. The markets for crude oil and natural gas have a history of significant price volatility and though prices will occasionally drop significantly, industry prices over the long term will continue to be driven by market supply and demand. If events and circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable, the Trustee would use the estimated undiscounted future net cash flows from the NPI to evaluate the recoverability of the Trust assets. If the undiscounted future net cash flows from the NPI are less than the NPI carrying value, the Trust would recognize an impairment loss for the difference between the NPI carrying value and the estimated fair value of the NPI. The determination as to whether the NPI is impaired requires a significant amount of judgment by the Trustee and is based on the best information available to the Trustee at the time of the evaluation, including information provided by XTO Energy such as estimates of future production and development and operating expenses.
Significantly, during the third quarter of 2019, long term gas prices used to develop projections of future cash flows declined further and excess costs on all three conveyances increased substantially. In light of these facts and circumstances, an impairment trigger event occurred in the third quarter of 2019. An assessment of the forecasted net cash flows for the NPI indicated that the estimated undiscounted future net cash flows from the NPI were below the carrying value of the NPI. During the third quarter of 2019, the NPI was written down to its fair value of zero, resulting in a $15.7 million impairment charged directly to Trust corpus, which does not affect distributable income. The fair value of the NPI was developed using estimates for future oil and gas production attributable to the Trust, future crude oil and natural gas commodity prices published by third-party industry experts (adjusted for basis differentials), estimated taxes, development and operating expenses, and a risk-adjusted discount rate. Impairments recorded for book purposes will not result in a loss for tax purposes for the unitholders until the loss is recognized.
Net profits interests in oil and gas properties
The initial carrying value of the net profits interests of $247,066,951 represents XTO Energys historical net book value for the interests on December 1, 1998, the date of the transfer to the Trust. During the second quarter 2016, the carrying value of the NPI was written down to its fair value of $28,801,000, resulting in an impairment of $57,306,527 charged directly to trust corpus. During the third quarter 2019, the carrying value of the NPI was written down to its fair value of zero, resulting in an impairment of $15,681,533 charged directly to trust corpus. Amortization of the net profits interests is calculated on a unit-of-production basis and charged directly to trust corpus. Accumulated amortization was $174,078,891 as of September 30, 2019 and $173,943,434 as of December 31, 2018.
Liquidity and Going Concern
The accompanying condensed financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Trust will continue as a going concern. Financial statements prepared on a going concern basis assume the realization of assets and the settlement of liabilities in the normal course of business. Increases in excess costs for the Kansas, Oklahoma and Wyoming conveyances have resulted in no net proceeds to the Trust for the last nine months of 2018 and a reduction in the Trusts expense reserve. In March through May of 2019, the Trust received net profits income from the Wyoming conveyance in an amount that covered all of the Trusts administrative expenses and allowed for a partial replenishment of the expense reserve, but there were no funds to distribute to unitholders. The net profits income in these months are not necessarily indicative of future cash inflows for the next 12 months. These conditions raise substantial doubt about the Trusts ability to continue as a going concern as the Trust may not have, based on the current estimated administrative expenses, sufficient cash to meet its obligations during the one year period after the date
11
Table of Contents
the condensed financial statements are issued. Factors attributable to the potential cash shortage are primarily the previously disclosed increase in development costs to drill four horizontal wells in Major County, Oklahoma (actual cost incurred through third quarter 2019 are $27 million net to the Trust) which have created an excess cost position on the Oklahoma conveyance. Additionally, excess cost positions on the Kansas and Wyoming conveyances have resulted in no net proceeds to the Trust from the Kansas conveyance for all of 2018 and 2019 and no net proceeds to the Trust from the Wyoming conveyance for all of 2018 and 2019, with the exception of the March through May distributions. The Trustee has prepared a preliminary budget estimating the administrative expenses for the next 12 months which assumes no cash inflow from either net profits income or from other sources. This budget estimates that the expense reserve will be depleted by approximately April 2020. If either income or expenses differ from the assumptions in the Trustees preliminary budget, this date may be sooner or later than the estimate. Both the Trustee and XTO Energy believe the Trust could obtain additional financing, including by borrowing under one or more debt instruments, in an amount sufficient to pay its obligations for the next year. This outcome would ensure that the Trust could continue as a going concern; however, there is no assurance that such additional financing could be obtained. If the Trust obtains debt financing, any funds borrowed must be repaid in full, including accrued interest, before distributions to unitholders could be made. The Trusts condensed financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.
2. | Development Costs |
The following summarizes actual development costs, development costs deducted in the calculation of net profits income, and the cumulative actual costs compared to the amount deducted for the underlying properties:
Three Months Ended September 30 |
Nine Months Ended September 30 | |||||||||||||||
2019 | 2018 | 2019 | 2018 | |||||||||||||
Cumulative actual costs under (over) the amount deducted - beginning of period |
$ | 2,137,110 | $ | 5,641,612 | $ | 13,913,191 | $ | 537,144 | ||||||||
Actual costs |
(10,414,724 | ) | (975,300 | ) | (30,645,355 | ) | (3,273,332 | ) | ||||||||
Budgeted / actual costs deducted |
8,277,614 | 6,562,500 | 16,732,164 | 13,965,000 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Cumulative actual costs under (over) the amount deducted - end of period |
$ | | $ | 11,228,812 | $ | | $ | 11,228,812 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The monthly deduction is based on the current level of development expenditures, budgeted future development costs and the cumulative actual costs under (over) previous deductions. XTO Energy has advised the Trustee that actual development costs for properties underlying the Kansas and Wyoming net profits interests were charged to the Trust as incurred. XTO has advised the Trustee that actual development costs for the properties underlying the Oklahoma net profits interests were charged to the Trust as incurred once the accrual was fully depleted as of the July 2019 distribution. XTO Energy has advised the Trustee that drilling in Major County, Oklahoma is complete and resulted in cost overruns due to unforeseen expenditures that were charged to the Trust in the third quarter of 2019. XTO Energy has advised the Trustee that 2019 budgeted development costs for the underlying properties are between $2 million and $4 million. The 2019 budget year generally coincides with the Trust distribution months from April 2019 through March 2020. Changes in oil or natural gas prices could impact future development plans on the underlying properties. XTO Energy has advised the Trustee that this monthly deduction will continue to be evaluated and revised as necessary.
12
Table of Contents
3. | Income Taxes |
For federal income tax purposes, the Trust constitutes a fixed investment trust that is taxed as a grantor trust. A grantor trust is not subject to tax at the trust level. Accordingly, no provision for income taxes has been made in the financial statements. The unitholders are considered to own the Trusts income and principal as though no trust were in existence. The income of the Trust is deemed to have been received or accrued by each unitholder at the time such income is received or accrued by the Trust and not when distributed by the Trust. Impairments recorded for book purposes will not result in a loss for tax purposes for the unitholders until the loss is recognized.
All revenues from the Trust are from sources within Kansas, Oklahoma or Wyoming. Because it distributes all of its net income to unitholders, the Trust has not been taxed at the trust level in Kansas or Oklahoma. While the Trust has not owed tax, the Trustee is generally required to file Kansas and Oklahoma income tax returns reflecting the income and deductions of the Trust attributable to properties located in each state, along with a schedule that includes information regarding distributions to unitholders. However, the Trust does not expect to file a Kansas income tax return for the 2019 tax year because it expects to have no revenues, income or deductions in 2019 attributable to properties located in Kansas. The Trust did not file a Kansas income tax return for the 2018 and 2017 tax years for the same reason.
Wyoming does not impose a state income tax.
The Trust could potentially be required to bear a portion of the legal settlement costs arising from the Chieftain settlement. For information on contingencies, including the Chieftain class action, see Note 4 to Condensed Financial Statements. In the event that the Trust is determined to be responsible for such costs, XTO will deduct the costs in its calculation of the net profits income payable to the Trust from the applicable net profits interests. Thus, for unitholders, the legal settlement costs will be reflected through a reduction in net profits income received from the Trust and thus in a reduction in the gross royalty income reported by and taxable to the unitholders. In the event that the Trustee objects to such claimed reductions, the Trustee may also incur legal fees in representing the Trusts interests. For unitholders, such costs would be reflected through an increase in the Trusts administrative expenses, which would be deductible by unitholders in determining the net royalty income from the Trust.
Each unitholder should consult his or her own tax advisor regarding income tax requirements, if any, applicable to such persons ownership of Trust units.
Unitholders should consult the Trusts latest annual report on Form 10-K for a more detailed discussion of federal and state tax matters.
4. | Contingencies |
Litigation
Royalty Class Action and Arbitration
As previously disclosed, XTO Energy advised the Trustee that it reached a settlement with the plaintiffs in the Chieftain class action royalty case. On July 27, 2018 the final plan of allocation was approved by the court. Based on the final plan of allocation XTO Energy has advised the Trustee that it believes approximately $24.3 million in additional production costs should be allocated to the Trust. On May 2, 2018, the Trustee
13
Table of Contents
submitted a demand for arbitration seeking a declaratory judgment that the Chieftain settlement is not a production cost and that XTO Energy is prohibited from charging the settlement as a production cost under the conveyance or otherwise reducing the Trusts payments now or in the future as a result of the Chieftain litigation. The hearing on the claims related to the Chieftain settlement has been rescheduled for January 20, 2020. Other Trustee claims related to disputed amounts on the computation of the Trusts net proceeds for 2014 through 2016 were bifurcated from the issues regarding XTOs right to charge the Chieftain settlement as a production cost and will be heard at a later date, which is still to be determined.
If the approximately $24.3 million allocated portion of the Chieftain settlement results in an adjustment to the Trusts share of net proceeds, it would result in additional excess costs under the Oklahoma conveyance that would likely result in no distributions under the Oklahoma conveyance for several years, or more depending on the results of operations of the underlying properties, while these additional excess costs are recovered.
Other Lawsuits and Governmental Proceedings
Certain of the underlying properties are involved in various other lawsuits and governmental proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business. XTO Energy has advised the Trustee that, based on the information available at this stage of the various proceedings, it does not believe that the ultimate resolution of these claims will have a material effect on the financial position or liquidity of the Trust, but may have an effect on annual distributable income.
Other
Several states have enacted legislation requiring state income tax withholding from payments made to nonresident recipients of oil and gas proceeds. After consultation with its tax counsel, the Trustee believes that it is not required to withhold on payments made to the unitholders. However, regulations are subject to change by the various states, which could change this conclusion. Should amounts be withheld on payments made to the Trust or the unitholders, distributions to the unitholders would be reduced by the required amount, subject to the filing of a claim for refund by the Trust or unitholders for such amount.
14
Table of Contents
5. | Excess Costs |
If monthly costs exceed revenues for any conveyance, such excess costs must be recovered, with accrued interest, from future net proceeds of that conveyance and cannot reduce net proceeds from other conveyances.
The following summarizes excess costs activity, cumulative excess costs balance and accrued interest to be recovered by conveyance:
Underlying | ||||||||||||||||
KS | OK | WY | Total | |||||||||||||
Cumulative excess costs remaining at 12/31/18 |
$ | 896,578 | $ | 15,576,231 | $ | 1,336,456 | $ | 17,809,265 | ||||||||
Net excess costs (recovery) for the quarter ended 3/31/19 |
13,547 | 5,391,871 | (1,336,456 | ) | 4,068,962 | |||||||||||
Net excess costs (recovery) for the quarter ended 6/30/19 |
148,644 | 69,876 | 176,518 | 395,038 | ||||||||||||
Net excess costs (recovery) for the quarter ended 9/30/19 |
361,811 | 7,022,818 | 1,415,623 | 8,800,252 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Cumulative excess costs remaining at 9/30/19 |
1,420,580 | 28,060,796 | 1,592,141 | 31,073,517 | ||||||||||||
Accrued interest at 9/30/19 |
209,742 | 444,206 | 8,228 | 662,176 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total remaining to be recovered at 9/30/19 |
$ | 1,630,322 | $ | 28,505,002 | $ | 1,600,369 | $ | 31,735,693 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NPI | ||||||||||||||||
KS | OK | WY | Total | |||||||||||||
Cumulative excess costs remaining at 12/31/18 |
$ | 717,263 | $ | 12,460,985 | $ | 1,069,165 | $ | 14,247,413 | ||||||||
Net excess costs (recovery) for the quarter ended 3/31/19 |
10,837 | 4,313,496 | (1,069,165 | ) | 3,255,168 | |||||||||||
Net excess costs (recovery) for the quarter ended 6/30/19 |
118,915 | 55,901 | 141,214 | 316,030 | ||||||||||||
Net excess costs (recovery) for the quarter ended 9/30/19 |
289,448 | 5,618,254 | 1,132,499 | 7,040,201 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Cumulative excess costs remaining at 9/30/19 |
1,136,463 | 22,448,636 | 1,273,713 | 24,858,812 | ||||||||||||
Accrued interest at 9/30/19 |
167,794 | 355,365 | 6,583 | 529,742 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total remaining to be recovered at 9/30/19 |
$ | 1,304,257 | $ | 22,804,001 | $ | 1,280,296 | $ | 25,388,554 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the quarter ended September 30, 2019, lower revenues in relation to costs resulted in net excess costs on properties underlying the Kansas, Oklahoma and Wyoming net profits interests.
Underlying cumulative excess costs for the Kansas, Oklahoma and Wyoming conveyances remaining as of September 30, 2019 totaled $31.7 million, including accrued interest of $0.7 million.
Item 2. Trustees Discussion and Analysis.
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the Trustees discussion and analysis contained in the Trusts 2018 Annual Report on Form 10-K, as well as the condensed financial statements and notes thereto included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. The Trusts Annual Report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and all amendments to those reports are available on the Trusts web site at www.hgt-hugoton.com.
15
Table of Contents
Distributable Income
Quarter
For the quarter ended September 30, 2019, net profits income was $0, as compared to $0 for third quarter 2018. No change in net profits income is primarily the result of increased development costs ($1.4 million), lower gas production ($1.2 million), lower gas and oil prices ($1.0 million), increased production expense ($0.7 million) and increased overhead ($0.2 million), partially offset by net excess costs activity ($2.5 million), and higher oil production ($2.0 million). See Net Profits Income below.
After adding interest income of $5,717, deducting administration expense of $236,691, and utilizing $230,974 of the expense reserve to pay Trust expenses, distributable income for the quarter ended September 30, 2019 was $0 or $0.000000 per unit of beneficial interest. Administration expense for the quarter increased $11,487 as compared to the prior year quarter, primarily related to the timing of receipt and payment of Trust expenses and terms of professional services. Changes in interest income are attributable to fluctuations in net profits income and interest rates. For third quarter 2018, distributable income was $0 or $0.000000 per unit.
Distributions to unitholders for the quarter ended September 30, 2019 were:
Record Date |
Payment Date |
Distribution |
||||
July 31, 2019 |
August 14, 2019 |
$ | 0.000000 | |||
August 30, 2019 |
September 16, 2019 |
0.000000 | ||||
September 30, 2019 |
October 15, 2019 |
0.000000 | ||||
|
|
|||||
$ | 0.000000 | |||||
|
|
Nine Months
For the nine months ended September 30, 2019, net profits income was $369,458 compared with $1,590,949 for the same 2018 period. This 77% decrease in net profits income is primarily the result of decreased gas production ($4.1 million), increased development costs ($2.2 million), increased taxes, transportation and other costs ($1.1 million), increased production expenses ($0.9 million) and lower oil prices ($0.7 million), partially offset by higher gas prices ($4.1 million), net excess costs activity ($1.8 million), higher oil production ($1.5 million), and decreased overhead ($0.4 million). See Net Profits Income below.
After adding interest income of $17,629, deducting administration expense of $675,019, and utilizing $287,932 of the expense reserve to pay Trust expenses, distributable income for the nine months ended September 30, 2019 was $0 or $0.000000 per unit of beneficial interest. Administration expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2019 decreased $210,640 as compared to the same 2018 period, primarily related the timing of receipt and payment of Trust expenses and terms of professional services. Changes in interest income are attributable to fluctuations in net profits income and interest rates. For the nine months ended September 30, 2018, distributable income was $370,040 or $0.009251 per unit.
16
Table of Contents
Net Profits Income
Net profits income is recorded when received by the Trust, which is the month following receipt by XTO Energy, and generally two months after oil and gas production. Net profits income is generally affected by three major factors:
- | oil and gas sales volumes, |
- | oil and gas sales prices, and |
- | costs deducted in the calculation of net profits income. |
17
Table of Contents
The following is a summary of the calculation of net profits income received by the Trust:
Three Months |
Nine Months |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Ended September 30 (a) | Increase (Decrease) |
Ended September 30 (a) | Increase (Decrease) |
|||||||||||||||||||||
2019 | 2018 | 2019 | 2018 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Sales Volumes |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gas (Mcf) (b) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Underlying properties |
2,672,338 | 3,337,746 | (20%) | 8,143,162 | 9,729,237 | (16%) | ||||||||||||||||||
Average per day |
29,047 | 36,280 | (20%) | 29,828 | 35,638 | (16%) | ||||||||||||||||||
Net profits interests |
| | | 109,541 | 447,961 | (76%) | ||||||||||||||||||
Oil (Bbls) (b) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Underlying properties |
84,215 | 39,525 | 113% | 156,357 | 120,668 | 30% | ||||||||||||||||||
Average per day |
915 | 430 | 113% | 573 | 442 | 30% | ||||||||||||||||||
Net profits interests |
| | | 249 | 7,627 | (97%) | ||||||||||||||||||
Average Sales Prices |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gas (per Mcf) |
$ | 2.25 | $ | 2.47 | (9%) | $ | 3.22 | $ | 2.69 | 20% | ||||||||||||||
Oil (per Bbl) |
$ | 54.64 | $ | 66.86 | (18%) | $ | 53.80 | $ | 61.17 | (12%) | ||||||||||||||
Revenues |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gas sales |
$ | 6,018,411 | $ | 8,249,425 | (27%) | $ | 26,207,342 | $ | 26,198,075 | | ||||||||||||||
Oil sales |
4,601,214 | 2,642,696 | 74% | 8,411,806 | 7,380,763 | 14% | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Total Revenues |
10,619,625 | 10,892,121 | (3%) | 34,619,148 | 33,578,838 | 3% | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Costs |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Taxes, transportation |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
and other |
2,227,020 | 2,166,680 | 3% | 7,482,909 | 6,118,432 | 22% | ||||||||||||||||||
Production expense |
5,793,859 | 4,942,127 | 17% | 14,920,810 | 13,781,997 | 8% | ||||||||||||||||||
Development costs (c) |
8,277,614 | 6,562,500 | 26% | 16,732,164 | 13,965,000 | 20% | ||||||||||||||||||
Overhead |
3,134,794 | 2,938,519 | 7% | 8,260,296 | 8,719,270 | (5%) | ||||||||||||||||||
Excess costs (d) |
(8,813,662 | ) | (5,717,705 | ) | 54% | (13,238,854 | ) | (10,994,547 | ) | 20% | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Total Costs |
10,619,625 | 10,892,121 | (3%) | 34,157,325 | 31,590,152 | 8% | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Net Proceeds |
| | | 461,823 | 1,988,686 | (77%) | ||||||||||||||||||
Net Profits Percentage |
80% | 80% | 80% | 80% | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Net Profits Income |
$ | | $ | | | $ | 369,458 | $ | 1,590,949 | (77%) | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) | Because of the two-month interval between time of production and receipt of net profits income by the Trust, (1) gas and oil sales for the quarter ended September 30 generally represent production for the period May through July and (2) gas and oil sales for the nine months ended September 30 generally represent production for the period November through July. |
(b) | Gas and oil sales volumes are allocated to the net profits interests by dividing Trust net cash inflows by average sales prices. As gas and oil prices change, the Trusts allocated production volumes are impacted as the quantity of production necessary to cover expenses changes inversely with price. As such, the underlying property production volume changes may not correlate with the Trusts allocated production volumes in any given period. Therefore, comparative discussion of gas and oil sales volumes is based on the underlying properties. |
(c) | See Note 2 to Condensed Financial Statements. |
(d) | See Note 5 to Condensed Financial Statements. |
18
Table of Contents
The following are explanations of significant variances on the underlying properties from third quarter 2018 to third quarter 2019 and from the first nine months of 2018 to the comparable period in 2019:
Sales Volumes
Gas
Gas sales volumes decreased 20% for the third quarter and 16% for the nine-month period as compared with the same 2018 periods primarily due to natural production decline, timing of cash receipts and change to account for a portion of gas sales as residue that were previously accounted for at the wellhead. This change does not affect the net profits income received by the Trust.
Oil
Oil sales volumes increased 113% for the third quarter and 30% for the nine-month period as compared with the same 2018 periods primarily due to oil sales from new wells in Major County, Oklahoma, partially offset by the timing of cash receipts and natural production decline.
The estimated rate of natural production decline on the underlying oil and gas properties is approximately 6% to 8% a year.
Sales Prices
Gas
The third quarter 2019 average gas price was $2.25 per Mcf, a 9% decrease from the third quarter 2018 average gas price of $2.47 per Mcf. For the nine-month period, the average gas price increased 20% to $3.22 per Mcf in 2019 from $2.69 per Mcf in 2018. The third quarter 2019 gas price is primarily related to production from May through July 2019, when the average NYMEX price was $2.50 per MMBtu.
Oil
The third quarter 2019 average oil price was $54.64 per Bbl, an 18% decrease from the third quarter 2018 average oil price of $66.86 per Bbl. For the nine-month period, the average oil price decreased 12% to $53.80 per Bbl in 2019 from $61.17 per Bbl in 2018. The third quarter 2019 oil price is primarily related to production from May through July 2019, when the average NYMEX price was $57.75 per Bbl.
Costs
Taxes, Transportation and Other
Taxes, transportation and other costs increased 3% for the third quarter and 22% for the nine-month period primarily because certain adjustments previously included in gas sales revenue are now recorded in this line item.
Production Expense
Production expense increased 17% for the third quarter primarily because of reporting of expense well work activity previously reported in development costs and other higher operating expenses in Kansas and Wyoming, partially offset by lower operating expenses in Oklahoma. Production expense increased 8% for the nine-month period primarily because of reporting of expense well work activity previously reported in development costs, partially offset by lower labor costs due to timing of charges.
19
Table of Contents
Development Costs
Development costs deducted are based on the current level of development expenditures, budgeted future development costs and the cumulative actual costs under (over) previous deductions. These development costs increased 26% for the third quarter and 20% for the nine-month period as compared with the same 2018 periods. Subsequent to June 30, 2019, XTO Energy has advised the Trustee that the budgeted development cost accrual was fully depleted as of the July 2019 distribution. XTO Energy also had previously advised the Trustee that once the accrual was fully depleted, development costs were charged to the Trust as they are incurred for all conveyances. XTO Energy has advised the Trustee that drilling in Major County, Oklahoma is complete and resulted in cost overruns due to unforeseen expenditures that were charged to the Trust in the third quarter of 2019. XTO Energy has advised the Trustee that this monthly deduction will continue to be evaluated and revised as necessary. For further information on development costs, see Note 2 to Condensed Financial Statements.
Overhead
Overhead increased 7% for the third quarter and decreased 5% for the nine-month period. Overhead is charged by XTO Energy and other operators for administrative expenses incurred to support operations of the underlying properties. Overhead fluctuates based on changes in the active well count and drilling activity on the underlying properties, as well as an annual cost level adjustment based on an industry index.
Excess Costs
If monthly costs exceed revenues for any conveyance, these excess costs must be recovered, with accrued interest, from future net proceeds of that conveyance and cannot reduce net profits income from another conveyance. Underlying cumulative excess costs for the Kansas, Oklahoma and Wyoming conveyances remaining as of September 30, 2019 totaled $31.7 million ($25.4 million NPI), including accrued interest of $0.7 million ($0.5 million NPI). For further information on excess costs, see Note 5 to Condensed Financial Statements.
Contingencies
For information on contingencies, see Note 4 to Condensed Financial Statements.
Forward-Looking Statements
Statements in this report relating to future plans, predictions, production, excess costs, litigation, arbitration, or liquidity, financing or regulatory or court decisions are forward-looking statements. All statements other than statements of historical fact included in this Form 10-Q, including, without limitation, statements regarding the net profits interests, underlying properties, development activities, annual and monthly development, production and other costs and expenses, estimated rates of natural production decline, monthly development cost deductions, oil and gas prices and differentials to NYMEX prices, estimated changes in expenses, supply levels, drilling, workover and restimulation plans, the outcome of litigation or settlement discussions and the impact on Trust proceeds, distributions to unitholders, and industry and market conditions, are forward-looking statements that are subject to risks and uncertainties, including those detailed in Part I, Item 1A of the Trusts Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018, which is incorporated by this reference as though fully set forth herein. XTO Energy and the Trustee assume no duty to update these statements as of any future date.
20
Table of Contents
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk.
Not applicable. Upon qualifying as a smaller reporting company, this information is no longer required.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures.
As of the end of the period covered by this report, the Trustee carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of the Trusts disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Exchange Act Rules 13a-15 and 15d-15. Based upon that evaluation, the Trustee concluded that the Trusts disclosure controls and procedures are effective in recording, processing, summarizing and reporting, on a timely basis, information required to be disclosed by the Trust in the reports that it files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and are effective in ensuring that information required to be disclosed by the Trust in the reports that it files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is accumulated and communicated to the Trustee to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In its evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures, the Trustee has relied, to the extent considered reasonable, on information provided by XTO Energy. There has not been any change in the Trusts internal control over financial reporting during the period covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Trusts internal control over financial reporting.
21
Table of Contents
Royalty Class Action and Arbitration
As previously disclosed, XTO Energy advised the Trustee that it reached a settlement with the plaintiffs in the Chieftain class action royalty case. On July 27, 2018 the final plan of allocation was approved by the court. Based on the final plan of allocation XTO Energy has advised the Trustee that it believes approximately $24.3 million in additional production costs should be allocated to the Trust. On May 2, 2018, the Trustee submitted a demand for arbitration seeking a declaratory judgment that the Chieftain settlement is not a production cost and that XTO Energy is prohibited from charging the settlement as a production cost under the conveyance or otherwise reducing the Trusts payments now or in the future as a result of the Chieftain litigation. The hearing on the claims related to the Chieftain settlement has been rescheduled for January 20, 2020. Other Trustee claims related to disputed amounts on the computation of the Trusts net proceeds for 2014 through 2016 were bifurcated from the issues regarding XTOs right to charge the Chieftain settlement as a production cost and will be heard at a later date, which is still to be determined.
If the approximately $24.3 million allocated portion of the Chieftain settlement results in an adjustment to the Trusts share of net proceeds, it would result in additional excess costs under the Oklahoma conveyance that would likely result in no distributions under the Oklahoma conveyance for several years, or more depending on the results of operations of the underlying properties, while these additional excess costs are recovered.
Other Lawsuits and Governmental Proceedings
Certain of the underlying properties are involved in various other lawsuits and governmental proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business. XTO Energy has advised the Trustee that, based on the information available at this stage of the various proceedings, it does not believe that the ultimate resolution of these claims will have a material effect on the financial position or liquidity of the Trust, but may have an effect on annual distributable income.
There have been no material changes in the risk factors disclosed under Part I, Item 1A of the Trusts Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018.
22
Table of Contents
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
HUGOTON ROYALTY TRUST | ||||||||
By SIMMONS BANK, TRUSTEE | ||||||||
By | /s/ NANCY WILLIS | |||||||
Nancy Willis | ||||||||
Vice President | ||||||||
EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION | ||||||||
Date: November 14, 2019 | By | /s/ DAVID LEVY | ||||||
David Levy | ||||||||
Vice President Upstream Business Services |
23