HURCO COMPANIES INC - Annual Report: 2007 (Form 10-K)
UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington,
D.C. 20549
FORM
10-K
(Mark
One)
T
|
Annual
report pursuant to Section
13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 for the fiscal
year
ended October 31,
2007or
|
£
|
Transition
report pursuant to
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 for
the
transition period from _________ to
_________.
|
Commission
File No.
0-9143
HURCO
COMPANIES,
INC.
(Exact
name of registrant as specified
in its charter)
Indiana
|
35-1150732
|
|||
(State
or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
|
(I.R.S.
Employer Identification Number)
|
|||
One
Technology Way
|
||||
Indianapolis,
Indiana
|
46268
|
|||
(Address
of principal executive offices)
|
(Zip
code)
|
Registrant’s
telephone number, including
area code (317)
293-5309
Securities
registered pursuant to
Section 12(b) of the Act:
|
None
|
|
Securities
registered pursuant to
Section 12(g) of the Act:
|
Common
Stock, No Par Value
|
|
(Title
of
Class)
|
Indicate
by check mark if the registrant
is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the
Securities
Act. Yes £ No T
Indicate
by check mark if the registrant
is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section
15(d). Yes £ No T
Indicate
by check mark whether the
registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or
15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months, and
(2)
has been subject to the filing requirements for at least the past 90 days. Yes T No £
Indicate
by check mark if disclosure of
delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained
herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge,
in
definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part
III
of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. T
Indicate
by check mark whether the
registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer or a
non-
accelerated
filer. See definition of
“accelerated filer” and “large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange
Act.
Large
accelerated filer
£
|
Accelerated
filer T
|
Non-accelerated
filer £
|
Indicate
by check mark whether the
registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange
Act). Yes £ No T
The
aggregate market value of the
registrant’s voting stock held by non-affiliates as of April 30, 2007 (the last
day of our most recently completed second quarter) was
$281,851,000.
The
number of shares of the registrant’s
common stock outstanding as of January 8, 2008 was
6,392,220.
DOCUMENTS
INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE:
Portions of the registrant’s Proxy Statement for its 2008 Annual Meeting of
Shareholders (Part III).
1
Disclosure
Concerning Forward-looking Statements
Certain
statements made in this annual report on form 10-K may constitute
“forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities
Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements
involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may
cause
our actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different
from
any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such
forward-looking statements. These factors include the risks
identified in Item 1A.
PART
I
Item1.
|
BUSINESS
|
General
Hurco
Companies, Inc. is an industrial technology company. We design,
manufacture and sell computerized machine tools to companies in the metal
working industry through a worldwide sales, service and distribution
network. Although our computer control systems and software products
are proprietary, they predominantly use industry standard personal computer
components. Our computer control systems and software products are
primarily sold as integral components of our computerized machine tool
products. As used in this report, the words “we”, “us” and “our”
refer to Hurco Companies, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries.
Since
our
founding in 1968, we have been a leader in the introduction of interactive
computer control systems that automate manufacturing processes and improve
productivity in the metal parts manufacturing industry. Hurco pioneered the
application of microprocessor technology and conversational programming software
for use on machine tools. We have concentrated on designing
“user-friendly” computer control systems that can be operated by both skilled
and unskilled machine tool operators and yet are capable of instructing a
machine to perform complex tasks. The combination of microprocessor
technology and patented interactive, conversational programming software
in our
computer control systems enables operators on the production floor to quickly
and easily create a program for machining a particular part from a blueprint
or
computer-aided design file and immediately begin machining that
part.
Our
executive offices and principal design and engineering operations are
headquartered in Indianapolis, Indiana. Sales, application
engineering and service offices are located in Indianapolis, Indiana;
Mississauga, Canada; High Wycombe, England; Munich, Germany; Paris, France;
Milan, Italy; Singapore and Taichung, Taiwan. We also have a
representative sales office in Shanghai, China, and a technical center in
Shenzhen, China. Distribution facilities are located in Los Angeles,
California, Venlo, the Netherlands, and Singapore, and our principal
manufacturing facility is located in Taiwan. In November 2006, we
registered a distribution company in India and throughout 2007 we established
distributor relationships that enable us to sell our products throughout
India. As part of our plan to increase capacity and reduce
manufacturing costs, we also opened a new manufacturing facility in Ningbo,
China. This facility currently focuses on machining castings and
components to support our manufacturing operation in Taiwan. In the
future, the Ningbo facility can be expanded to include sub-assembly
operations. Eventually, machines designed specifically for the
Chinese market will be produced at the Ningbo facility.
Our
strategy is to design, manufacture and sell to the global metalworking market
a
comprehensive line of computerized machine tools that incorporate our
proprietary, interactive computer control technology. Our technology
is designed to enhance the machine tool user's productivity through ease
of
operation and higher levels of machine performance (speed, accuracy and surface
finish quality). We use an open system software architecture that
permits our computer control systems and software to be produced using standard
PC hardware. We have emphasized a “user-friendly” design that employs both
interactive conversational and graphical programming software. Each year
we have
expanded our product offering to meet customer needs, which has led us to
design
and manufacture more complex machining centers with advanced
capabilities. We utilize a disciplined approach to strategically
enter new geographic markets, as appropriate. Our introduction of
new, technologically advanced products, combined with our expansion into
new
markets, has resulted in our significant growth over the last several
years. In addition to this strong organic growth, our recent
performance and current financial strength also provide us with the capability
to pursue opportunistic acquisitions that are consistent with our strategic
focus on expanding our product line and entering new markets.
2
Industry
Machine
tool products are considered capital goods, which makes them part
of an industry that has historically been highly
cyclical.
Although,
industry association data for the U.S. machine tool market is available,
that
market accounts for only 11% of worldwide consumption. Reports available
for the U.S. machine tool market include:
|
·
|
United
States Machine Tool Consumption – generated by the Association for
Manufacturing Technology and American Machine Tool Distributor
Association, this report includes metal cutting machines of all
types and
sizes, including segments in which we do not compete
|
|
·
|
Purchasing
Manager’s Index - developed by the Institute for Supply
Management and reports activity levels in U.S. manufacturing
plants that purchase machine tools
|
|
·
|
Capacity
Utilization of Manufacturing Companies – issued by the Federal
Reserve Board
|
A
limited
amount of information for foreign markets is available, and different
reporting methodologies are used by various countries. Machine tool
consumption data published by Gardner Publications, Inc., calculates machine
tool consumption annually by country. It is important to note that data
for foreign countries is based on government reports that may lag six to
twelve
months and therefore is unreliable for forecasting purposes.
Demand
for capital equipment can fluctuate during periods of changing economic
conditions. Manufacturers and suppliers of capital goods, such as Hurco,
are often the first to experience these changes in demand. Additionally,
since our order backlog is approximately 60 days, it is difficult to
estimate demand with any reasonable certainty. Therefore, we do not have
the
benefit of relying on the common leading indicators that are available to
many
other industries for market analysis and forecasting purposes.
3
Products
Our
core
products consist of general purpose computerized machine tools for the metal
cutting industry. These are, principally, vertical machining centers
(mills) and turning centers (lathes), with which our proprietary software
and
computer control systems are fully integrated. We also produce computer control
systems and related software for press brake applications that are sold as
retrofit control systems. Additionally, we produce and
distribute software options, control upgrades, hardware accessories and
replacement parts for our machine tool product lines and provide operator
training and support services to our customers.
The
following table sets forth the contribution of each of our product groups
to our
total sales and service fees during each of the past three fiscal
years:
Net
Sales and Service Fees by Product Category
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars
in thousands)
|
Year
ended October 31,
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
2007
|
2006
|
2005
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Continuing
Products and Services
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Computerized
Machine Tools
|
$ | 165,832 | 88.2 | % | $ | 128,946 | 86.8 | % | $ | 107,313 | 85.5 | % | ||||||||||||
Computer
Control Systems and Software *
|
5,291 | 2.8 | % | 4,694 | 3.2 | % | 4,129 | 3.3 | % | |||||||||||||||
Service
Parts
|
12,096 | 6.4 | % | 10,494 | 7.0 | % | 9,991 | 8.0 | % | |||||||||||||||
Service
Fees
|
4,828 | 2.6 | % | 4,383 | 3.0 | % | 4,076 | 3.2 | % | |||||||||||||||
Total
|
$ | 188,047 | 100 | % | $ | 148,517 | 100 | % | $ | 125,509 | 100 | % |
*
Amounts shown do
not
include computer control systems sold as integrated components of computerized
machine tools.
Computerized
Machine Tools – Machining Centers
We
design, manufacture and sell computerized machine tools equipped with a fully
integrated interactive computer control system. During fiscal 2007 our twin
touch-screen control console and our single touch-screen control console
were
shipped with our new WinMax®
software. Our computer control system enables a machine tool operator
to
create complex two-dimensional or three-dimensional machining programs directly
from an engineering drawing or computer aided design geometry file. An operator
with little or no machine tool programming experience can successfully create
a
program with minimal training and begin machining the part in a short period
of
time. The control features an operator console with a liquid crystal
display (LCD), and incorporates an upgradeable personal computer (PC) platform
using a Pentium®*
class
processor with solid rendering graphical programming. In addition,
WinMax®
has a Windows®**
based
operating system to enable users to improve shop floor flexibility and software
productivity. File management, process control, networking, and combining
programming formats are enhanced with the new WinMax®
control
software.
In
the
intensely competitive global manufacturing marketplace, significant increases
in
productivity are being derived from control and software technologies. Companies
using computer controlled machine tools are better able to:
|
·
|
maximize
the efficiency of their human resources
|
|
·
|
continue
to expand their capability of making more advanced and complex
parts from
a wide range of materials and multiple processes
|
|
·
|
maintain
the ability to incorporate fast moving changes in technology into
their
operations to keep their competitive edge
|
|
·
|
continue
to integrate themselves into the global supply chain of their customers
by
supporting small to medium lot sizes for “just in time” initiatives
|
*Pentium®
is a
registered trademark of Intel Corporation.
**Windows®
is a
registered trademark of Microsoft Corporation.
4
Our
Windows®**
based
control facilitates our ability to meet these customer needs. Companies are
finding that the familiar Windows®**
operating system coupled with the Hurco conversational style of program creation
means that their operators are capable of creating and editing part programs
without the overhead of specialized computer aided design and computer aided
manufacturing programmers. With the ability to transfer most computer aided
design data directly into a Hurco program, programming time becomes minutes
instead of hours.
Products
today are being designed to meet the demand for machining complex parts with
greater part accuracies. Our proprietary controls with WinMax®
software
and Pentium®*
processors are capable of processing the large amounts of data required for
these parts to be processed at world-class speeds and accuracies. We continue
to
add technology to our control design as it becomes available.
Our
offering of machining centers, currently equipped with either a twin
touch-screen or single touch-screen control console, consists of the following
four product lines:
VM
Product Line
The
VM
product line consists of moderately priced vertical machining centers for
the
entry-level market. Their design premise of a machining center with a large
work
cube and a small footprint optimizes the use of available floor space. The
VM
line consists of four models in three sizes with X-axis (horizontal) travels
of
26, 40, and 50 inches. The base prices of the VM machines range from $40,000
to
$80,000.
VMX
Product Line
The
VMX
product line consists of higher performing vertical machining centers aimed
at
manufacturers that require greater part accuracy. It is our signature product
line. The VMX line consists of 14 models in seven sizes with X-axis travels
of
24, 30, 40, 50, 60, 64, and 84 inches. The base prices of VMX machines range
from $50,000 to $200,000.
Five-Axis
and Horizontal Machining Centers
The
Five-Axis and Horizontal product line is targeted at manufacturers seeking
to
produce complex multi-sided parts in a single setup. Purchasing one of these
machining centers can yield significant productivity gains for operations
that
previously processed each side of a part individually. The Five-Axis
and Horizontal product line in 2007 consisted of four models, three vertical
cutting machines and one horizontal cutting machine. The base prices
of the five-axis and horizontal machines range from $160,000 to
$180,000.
TM/TMM
Product Line
Since
its
introduction in fiscal 2005, we have continued to expand the TM turning center
(horizontal slant-bed lathe) product line. The TM series is designed for
entry-level job shops and contract manufacturers seeking efficient processing
of
small to medium lot sizes. The TM is offered in three models with chucks
of 6,
8, and 10 inches respectively. In September 2006, we further enhanced the
capability of the TM turning centers with the addition of “live” or powered
tooling on the lathe turret. Designated as the TMM product line, these machines
allow our customers to complete a number of secondary milling, drilling and
tapping operations, while the part is still held in the chuck after the turning
operations are complete. This ability to “mill/turn” or “multi-task” on the same
machine in a single setup can provide significant productivity gains. Two
TMM
models with this capability are being offered. The base prices of the
TM/TMM machines range from $40,000 to $85,000.
*Pentium®
is a
registered trademark of Intel Corporation.
**Windows®
is a
registered trademark of Microsoft Corporation.
5
Computer
Control Systems and Software
The
following machine tool computer control systems and software products are
sold
directly to end-users and/or to original equipment manufacturers.
Autobend®
Autobend®
computer
control systems are applied to metal bending press brake machines that
form
parts from sheet metal and steel plate. They consist of a
microprocessor-based computer control and back gauge (an automated gauging
system that determines where the bend will be made). We have
manufactured and sold the Autobend®
product
line since 1968. We currently market two models of our Autobend®
computer
control systems for press brake machines, in combination with six different
back
gauges, through distributors to end-users as retrofit units for installation
on
existing or new press brake machines, as well as to original equipment
manufacturers and importers.
Software
Products
In
addition to our standard computer control features, we offer software option
products for two-dimensional and three-dimensional programming. These
products are sold to users of our computerized machine tools equipped with
our
twin touch-screen or single touch-screen consoles
featuring WinMax®
control
software. The options include: Swept Surface, SelectSurface Finish
Quality (SFQ), DXF Transfer, UltiNetTM,
UltiPocketTM,
Conversational Part and Tool Probing, and Advanced Verification
Graphics.
Our
Swept
Surface software option simplifies programming of 3D contours and significantly
reduces programming time. SelectSurface Finish Quality (SFQ) lets the customer
control surface finish quality and run time in one easy step.
The
DXF
Transfer software option can substantially increase operator productivity
because it eliminates manual data entry of part features by transferring
AutoCADTM
drawing
files directly into the Hurco computer control or into our desktop programming
software, WinMax Desktop.
UltiNetÔ
is a networking software
option used by our customers to transfer part design and manufacturing
information to computerized machine tools at high speeds and to network
computerized machine tools within the customer's manufacturing
facility.
UltiPocketTM
automatically calculates the tool path around islands, eliminating the arduous
task of plotting these shapes. Islands can also be rotated, scaled
and repeated.
Conversational
Part and Tool Probing options permit the computerized dimensional measurement
of
machined parts and the associated cutting tools. This “on-machine”
technique improves the throughput of the measurement process when compared
to
traditional “off-machine” approaches.
The
Advanced Verification Graphics
feature significantly reduces both scrap and programming time because it
provides customers with three-dimensional, solid rendering of the part including
dynamic rotation. This feature allows a customer to view the rendered part
from
any angle without needing to redraw it.
Parts
and
Service
Our
service organization provides installation, warranty, operator training and
customer support for our products on a worldwide basis. In the United
States, our principal distributors have primary responsibility for machine
installation and warranty service and support for product sales. Our
service organization also sells software options, computer control upgrades,
accessories and replacement parts for our products. Our after-sales
parts and service business strengthens our customer relationships and provides
continuous information concerning the evolving requirements of
end-users.
6
Manufacturing
Our
manufacturing strategy is based on sourcing of our modular designed components
from a network of contract suppliers and sub-contractors who manufacture
our
components in accordance with our proprietary design, quality standards and
cost
specifications. This has enabled us to lower our production costs, reduce
our
working capital per sales dollar, and increase our worldwide manufacturing
capacity without significant incremental investment in capital equipment
or
personnel.
Our
computerized metal cutting machine tools are manufactured to our specifications
primarily by our wholly owned subsidiary in Taiwan, Hurco Manufacturing Limited
(HML). This subsidiary has increased our overall capacity and reduced
our dependence on other manufacturers. In addition, we have a
relationship with a contract machine manufacturer in Taiwan that produces
certain models included in our product line. Both of these companies conduct
final assembly operations and are supported by a network of sub-contract
suppliers of components and sub-assemblies. In 2006, we opened a new
manufacturing facility in Ningbo, China that focuses on the machining of
castings and components to support production in Taiwan. In the
future, we can expand the Ningbo facility to include sub-assembly
operations. Eventually, we expect that machines designed specifically
for the Chinese market will be produced at the Ningbo facility.
We
have a
contract manufacturing agreement for computer control systems with Hurco
Automation, Ltd., a Taiwanese company in which we have a 35% ownership
interest. This company produces all of our computer control systems
to our specifications, sources industry standard computer components and
our
proprietary parts, performs final assembly, and conducts test
operations.
We
work
closely with our wholly owned subsidiaries, contract manufacturer, key component
suppliers, and our minority-owned affiliate to ensure that their production
capacity will be sufficient to meet the projected demand for our machine
tool
products. We continue to consider additional contract manufacturing
resources to increase our long term capacity. Many of the key components
used in
our machines can be sourced from multiple suppliers. However, any prolonged
interruption of operations or significant reduction in the capacity or
performance capability of our Taiwanese manufacturing facilities, or key
component suppliers could have a material adverse effect on our
operations.
Marketing
and Distribution
We
sell
our products through more than 170 independent agents and distributors in
countries throughout North America, Europe and Asia. Although some of
our distributors may carry competitive products, the Hurco line is the primary
line for the majority of our distributors globally. We also have
direct sales personnel in Canada, England, France, Germany, Italy, Singapore
and
China, which are among the world's principal machine tool consuming
countries.
Approximately
89% of the worldwide demand for computerized machine tools and computer control
systems is outside the United States. In fiscal 2007, more than
two-thirds of our revenues were from overseas customers. No single
end-user or distributor of our products accounted for more than 5% of our
total
sales and service fees.
The
end-users of our computerized machine tools are precision tool, die and mold
manufacturers, independent metal parts manufacturers, and specialized production
application or prototype departments within large manufacturing
companies. Industries served include aerospace, defense, medical
equipment, energy, automotive/transportation, electronics and computer
equipment.
Our
computerized machine tool software options and accessories are sold primarily
to
end-users. We sell our AutobendÒ
computer control systems to original equipment manufacturers of new machine
tools who integrate them with their own products prior to the sale of those
products to their own customers, to retrofitters of used machine tools who
integrate them with those machines as part of the retrofitting operation,
and to
end-users who have an installed base of machine tools, either with or without
related computer control systems.
7
Demand
We
believe that advances in industrial technology and the related demand for
automated process improvements drive demand for our products.
Other
factors affecting demand
include:
|
·
|
the
need to continuously improve
productivity and shorten cycle
time
|
|
·
|
an
aging machine tool installed
base that will require replacement with more advanced and efficient
technology created by shorter product life
cycles
|
|
·
|
the
industrial development of
emerging markets in Asia and Eastern
Europe
|
|
·
|
the
declining supply of skilled
machinists
|
Demand
for our products is also highly dependent upon economic conditions and the
general level of business confidence, as well as such factors as production
capacity utilization and changes in governmental policies regarding tariffs,
corporate taxation, and other investment incentives. By marketing and
distributing our products on a worldwide basis, we seek to reduce the impact
of
adverse changes in economic conditions that might occur in a particular
geographic region.
Competition
We
compete with many other machine tool producers in the United States and foreign
markets. Most of our competitors are larger and have greater
financial resources than our company. In the United States and
European metal cutting markets, major competitors include Haas Automation,
Inc.,
Daewoo, Miltronics, Deckel Maho Gildemeister Group (DMG), Hardinge Inc. and
MAG
Industrial Automation Systems. There are also a large number of other
foreign manufacturers, including Okuma Machinery Works Ltd., Mori Seiki Co.,
Ltd., Masak and Matsuura Machinery Corporation.
We
strive
to compete effectively by incorporating into our products unique, patented
software, and other proprietary features that offer enhanced productivity,
technological capabilities and ease of use. We offer our products in
a range of prices and capabilities to target a broad potential
market. We also believe that our competitiveness is aided by our
reputation for reliability and quality, our strong international sales and
distribution organization, and our extensive customer service
organization.
Intellectual
Property
We
consider our products to be proprietary. Various features of our
control systems and machine tools employ technologies covered by patents
that
are material to our business. We also own additional patents covering
new technologies that we have acquired or developed, and that we are planning
to
incorporate into our control systems in the future.
Research
and
Development
Non-capitalized
research and development expenditures for new products and significant product
improvements were $3.1 million, $2.5 million and $2.4 million in fiscal 2007,
2006, and 2005, respectively. In addition, we recorded expenditures
of $1.2 million in 2007, $2.1 million in 2006, and $1.2 million in 2005,
related
to software development projects that were capitalized.
Employees
We
had
approximately 380 full-time employees at the end 2007, none of whom are covered
by a collective-bargaining agreement or represented by a union. We
have experienced no employee-generated work stoppages or disruptions and
we
consider our employee relations to be satisfactory.
8
Geographic
Areas
Financial
information about geographic areas is set forth in Note 14 of Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements.
The
risks
of doing business on a global basis are set forth in Item 1A.
Backlog
For
information on orders and backlog,
see Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operation.
Availability
of Reports and
Other Information
Our
website is www.hurco.com. We
make available on this website, free of charge, access to our annual, quarterly
and current reports and other documents filed by us with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (SEC) as soon as reasonably practical after the filing
date. These reports can also be obtained at the SEC’s Public
Reference Room at 100 F Street, NE Washington, DC 20549.
Item
1A.
|
RISK
FACTORS
|
In
this
section we describe a number of risks related to our business. The
risks and uncertainties described below or elsewhere in this report are not
the
only ones to which we are exposed. Additional risks and uncertainties not
presently known and/or risks we currently deem immaterial may also adversely
affect our business and operations. If any of the developments included in
the
following risks were to occur, our business, financial condition, results
of
operations, cash flows or prospects could be materially adversely
affected.
The
cyclical nature of our business causes fluctuations in our operating results.
The
machine tool industry is highly cyclical and changes in demand can occur
abruptly in the geographic markets we serve. As a result of this cyclicality,
we
have experienced in the past, and expect to experience in the future,
significant fluctuations in our sales, which will affect our results of
operations and financial condition.
Our
international operations pose additional risks that may adversely impact
sales
and earnings.
During
the fiscal year ended October 31, 2007, more than two-thirds of our revenues
were derived from sales to customers located outside the United
States. We also have manufacturing facilities and assets located
outside of the United States. These international operations are
subject to a number of risks, including:
|
·
|
trade
barriers
|
|
·
|
regional
economic uncertainty
|
|
·
|
differing
labor regulation
|
|
·
|
risk
of governmental expropriation
|
|
·
|
domestic
and foreign customs and tariffs
|
|
·
|
current
and changing regulatory environments affecting the importation
and
exportation of products and raw materials
|
|
·
|
difficulty
in obtaining distribution support
|
|
·
|
difficulty
in staffing and managing widespread operations
|
|
·
|
differences
in the availability and terms of financing
|
|
·
|
political
instability and unrest
|
|
·
|
risks
of changes in taxes
|
|
·
|
tax
implications from repatriation of funds
|
9
Quotas,
tariffs, taxes or other trade barriers could require us to change manufacturing
sources, reduce prices, increase spending on marketing or product development,
withdraw from or not enter certain markets or otherwise take actions that
could
be adverse to us. Also, in some foreign jurisdictions, we may be
subject to laws limiting the right and ability of entities organized or
operating therein to pay dividends or remit earnings to affiliated companies
unless specified conditions are met. These factors may adversely
affect our future operating results. All of our products are shipped
from our manufacturing facility in Taiwan from the Port of Taichung to three
ports of destination: Los Angeles, California, Venlo, Netherlands, and
Singapore. Changes in customs requirements, as a result of national
security or other constraints put upon these ports, may also have an adverse
impact on our future operating results.
We
depend on limited sources for our products.
Our
wholly owned subsidiary in Taiwan, Hurco Manufacturing Ltd. (HML), produces
over
98% of our machine tools. Any interruption in manufacturing at HML
would have an adverse effect on our financial operating
results. Interruption in manufacturing at HML could result from a
change in the political environment or a natural disaster, such as an
earthquake, typhoon, or tsunami. Any interruption with our contract manufacturer
or one of our key component suppliers may also have an adverse effect on
our
operating results and our financial condition.
Fluctuations
in the exchange rates between the U.S. Dollar and any of several foreign
currencies could increase our costs or decrease our revenue.
Our
international sales divisions generate more than two-thirds of our revenues,
which are received in several foreign currencies, primarily the Euro and
Pound
Sterling. Therefore, our results of operations and financial condition are
affected by fluctuations in exchange rates between these currencies and the
U.S.
Dollar, both for purposes of actual conversion and financial reporting purposes.
In addition, payments for components incorporated into our products are made
in
the New Taiwan Dollar. We hedge our foreign currency exposure with
the purchase of forward exchange contracts. Hedge contracts only mitigate
the
impact of changes in foreign currency rates that occur during the term of
the
related hedge contract period. Refer to Note 1 of Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements for the impact of translation of foreign
currencies and hedging on the consolidated financial statements.
Our
competitive position and prospects for growth may be diminished if we are
unable
to develop and introduce new and enhanced products on a timely basis that
are
accepted in the market.
The
machine tool industry is subject to technological change, evolving industry
standards, changing customer requirements, and improvements in and expansion
of
product offerings. Our ability to anticipate changes in technology, industry
standards, customer requirements and product offerings by competitors, and
to
develop and introduce new and enhanced products on a timely basis that are
accepted in the market, will be significant factors in maintaining or improving
our competitive position and growth prospects. If the technologies or
standards used in our products become obsolete or fail to gain widespread
commercial acceptance, our business would be materially adversely affected.
Although we believe that we have the technological capabilities to remain
competitive, developments by others may render our products or technologies
obsolete or noncompetitive.
We
compete with larger companies that have greater financial resources, and
our
business could be harmed by competitors’ actions.
The
markets in which our products are sold are extremely competitive and highly
fragmented. In marketing our products, we compete with other manufacturers
in
terms of quality, reliability, price, value, delivery time, service and
technological characteristics. We compete with a number of U.S., European
and
Asian competitors, most of which are larger, have substantially greater
financial resources, and are supported by governmental or financial institution
subsidies. While we believe our product lines compete effectively, our financial
resources are limited compared to those of most of our competitors’, making it
challenging to remain competitive.
10
Fluctuation
of the price of raw materials, especially steel and iron, could adversely
affect
our sales, costs and profitability.
We
manufacture products with a high iron and steel content for which worldwide
prices have increased significantly. The availability and price for these
and
other raw materials are subject to volatility due to worldwide supply and
demand
forces, speculative actions, inventory levels, exchange rates, production
costs,
and anticipated or perceived shortages. In some cases, those cost increases
can
be passed on to customers in the form of price increases; in other cases
they
cannot. If the prices of raw materials increase and we are not able to charge
our customers higher prices to compensate, it would adversely affect our
results
of operations.
Due
to future changes in technology, changes in market demand, or changes in
market
expectations, portions of our inventory may become obsolete or
excess.
The
technology within our products changes and generally new versions of machines
are brought to market in three to five year cycles. The phasing out of an
old
product involves estimating the amount of inventory to hold to satisfy the
final
demand for those machines and to satisfy future repair part needs. Based
on
changing customer demand and expectations of delivery times for repair parts,
we
may find that we have either obsolete or excess inventory on hand. Because
of
unforeseen future changes in technology, market demand, or competition, we
might
have to write off unusable inventory, which may adversely affect our results
of
operations.
We
may make acquisitions that could disrupt our operations and harm our operating
results.
We
may
seek to expand our product offerings or the markets we serve by acquiring
other
companies, product lines, technologies, and personnel. Acquisitions
involve numerous risks, including the following:
|
·
|
difficulties
integrating the operations, technologies, products, and personnel
of the
acquired companies
|
|
·
|
diversion
of management’s attention from normal daily operations of the business
|
|
·
|
potential
difficulties completing projects associated with in-process research
and
development
|
|
·
|
difficulties
entering markets in which we have no or limited prior experience,
especially when competitors in such markets have stronger market
positions
|
|
·
|
initial
dependence on unfamiliar supply chains or relatively small supply
partners
|
|
·
|
insufficient
revenues to offset increased expenses associated with acquisitions
|
|
·
|
the
potential loss of key employees of the acquired companies
|
Acquisitions
may also cause us to:
|
·
|
issue
common stock that would dilute our current shareholders’ percentage
ownership
|
|
·
|
assume
liabilities
|
|
·
|
record
goodwill and non-amortizable intangible assets that will be subject
to
impairment testing on a regular basis and potential periodic impairment
charges
|
|
·
|
incur
amortization expenses related to certain intangible assets
|
|
·
|
incur
large and immediate write-offs, and restructuring and other related
expenses
|
|
·
|
become
subject to litigation
|
Mergers
and acquisitions are inherently risky. No assurance can be given that our
acquisitions will be successful. Further, no assurance can be given that
acquisitions will not adversely affect our business, operating results, or
financial condition. Failure to manage and successfully integrate acquisitions
could harm our business and operating results in a material way. Even when
an
acquired company has already developed and marketed products, there can be
no
assurance that product enhancements will be made in a timely manner or that
pre-acquisition due diligence will identify all possible issues that might
arise
with respect to such products.
11
Risks
related to new product development also apply to acquisitions. For additional
information, please see the risk factor above entitled, “Due to future changes
in technology, changes in market demand, or changes in market expectations,
portions of our inventory may become obsolete or excess.”
Intangible
or other assets may become impaired requiring us to record a significant
charge
to earnings.
Under
U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, we review our assets for
impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying
value
may not be recoverable. Intangible assets and our investment
accounted for under the equity method are required to be tested for impairment
at least annually. We may be required to record a significant charge
to earnings in our financial statements for the period in which any impairment
of these assets is determined. This may adversely affect our results
of operations. To date we have not taken a significant charge for an
impairment of assets.
Our
continued success depends on our ability to protect our intellectual
property.
Our
future success depends in part upon our ability to protect our intellectual
property. We rely principally on nondisclosure agreements, other
contractual arrangements, trade secret law, trademark and patent law, to
protect
our intellectual property. However these measures may be inadequate
to protect our intellectual property from infringement by others or prevent
misappropriation of our proprietary rights. In addition, the laws of
some foreign countries do not protect proprietary rights to the same extent
as
do U.S. laws. Our inability to protect our proprietary information
and enforce our intellectual property rights through infringement proceedings
could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition
and
results of operations.
The
unplanned loss of current members of our senior management team and other
key
personnel may adversely affect our operating results.
The
unexpected loss of senior management or other key personnel could impair
our
ability to carry out our business plan. We believe that our future success
will
depend in part on our ability to attract and retain highly skilled and qualified
personnel. The loss of senior management or other key personnel may adversely
affect our operating results as we incur costs to replace the departed personnel
and potentially lose opportunities in the transition of important job
functions.
Item
1B.
|
UNRESOLVED
STAFF
COMMENTS
|
None.
12
Item
2
|
PROPERTIES
|
The
following table sets forth the
location, size and principal use of each of our facilities:
Location
|
Square
Footage
|
|
Principal
Uses
|
||
Indianapolis,
Indiana
|
165,000
|
(1)
|
Corporate
headquarters, design and
engineering, product testing, sales and marketing, application
engineering
and customer service
|
||
Los
Angeles, California
|
13,000
|
Warehouse,
distribution, sales,
application engineering and customer service
|
|||
Mississauga,
Canada
|
3,600
|
Sales,
application engineering and
customer service
|
|||
|
|||||
High
Wycombe, England
|
12,000
|
Sales,
application engineering and
customer service
|
|||
Paris,
France
|
4,700
|
Sales,
application engineering and
customer service
|
|||
Munich and
Rodermark,
Germany
|
25,000
|
Sales,
application engineering and
customer service
|
|||
Milanand
Venice,
Italy
|
7,400
|
Sales,
application engineering and
customer service
|
|||
Singapore
|
3,000
|
Sales,
application engineering and
customer service
|
|||
Shanghai,
China
|
1,200
|
Sales,
application engineering and
customer service
|
|||
Taichung,
Taiwan
|
193,000
|
Manufacturing
|
|||
Ningbo,
China
|
31,000
|
Manufacturing
|
(1)
|
Approximately
50,000 square feet
is leased to a third-party under a lease, which expires April 30,
2010.
|
We
own
the Indianapolis facility and lease all other facilities. The leases
have terms expiring at various dates ranging from April 2008 to April
2014. We believe that all of our facilities are well maintained and
are adequate for our needs now and in the foreseeable future. We do
not believe that we would experience any difficulty in replacing any of the
present facilities if any of our leases were not renewed at
expiration.
Item
3.
|
LEGAL
PROCEEDINGS
|
We
are
involved in various claims and lawsuits arising in the normal course of
business. We do not expect any of these claims, individually or in
the aggregate, to have a material adverse effect on our financial position
or
results of operations.
13
Item
4.
|
SUBMISSION
OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY
HOLDERS
|
None.
Executive
Officers of the Registrant
Executive
officers are elected each year
by the Board of Directors at the first board meeting following the Annual
Meeting of Shareholders to serve during the ensuing year and until their
respective successors are elected and qualified. There are no family
relationships between any of our executive officers or between any of them
and
any of the members of the Board of Directors.
The
following information sets forth as
of October 31, 2007, the name of each executive officer and his or her age,
tenure as an officer, principal occupation and business experience for the
last
five years:
Name
|
Age
|
Position(s)
with the Company
|
||
Michael
Doar
|
52
|
Chairman
of the Board and Chief Executive
Officer
|
||
James
D.
Fabris
|
56
|
President
and Chief Operating
Officer
|
||
John
G.
Oblazney
|
39
|
Vice
President, Secretary,
Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
|
||
Sonja
K.
McClelland
|
36
|
Corporate
Controller, Assistant
Secretary
|
Michael
Doar was elected
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer on November 14,
2001. Mr. Doar had held various management positions with Ingersoll
Milling Machine Company from 1989 until 2001. Mr. Doar has been a
director of Hurco since 2000.
James
D.
Fabris was elected President and Chief Operating Officer on November 14,
2001. Mr. Fabris served as Executive Vice President - Operations from
November 1997 until his current appointment and previously served as a Vice
President of Hurco since February 1995.
John
G.
Oblazney was elected Vice President, Secretary, Treasurer and Chief Financial
Officer in September 2006. Prior to joining us, Mr. Oblazney served
as the Chief Financial Officer of Carrier Corporation’s Light Commercial
Business, a division of United Technologies Corporation, since December 2005.
Prior to that, Mr. Oblazney served in various other financial positions with
Carrier Corporation from 2000 to 2005. Prior to joining Carrier
Corporation, Mr. Oblazney was employed for six years with Cooper Industries
and
employed three years by an international public accounting firm.
Sonja
K. McClelland has been employed by
Hurco since September 1996 and was elected Corporate Controller, Assistant
Secretary in November 2004. Ms. McClelland served as Corporate
Accounting Manager from September 1996 to 1999, then as Division Controller
for
Hurco USAfrom
September 1999 to November
2004. Prior to joining Hurco, Ms. McClelland was employed for three
years by an international public accounting firm.
14
PART
II
Item
5.
|
MARKET
FOR THE REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
ANDISSUER
PURCHASES OF EQUITY
SECURITIES
|
Our
common stock is traded on the Nasdaq Global Select Market under the symbol
“HURC”. The following table sets forth the high and low sale prices
of the shares of our common stock for the periods indicated, as reported
by the
Nasdaq Global Select Market.
2007
|
2006
|
|||||||||||||||
Fiscal
Quarter Ended:
|
High
|
Low
|
High
|
Low
|
||||||||||||
January
31
|
$ | 33.18 | $ | 24.61 | $ | 35.30 | $ | 17.74 | ||||||||
April
30
|
47.86 | 33.07 | 37.47 | 23.75 | ||||||||||||
July
31
|
56.28 | 39.12 | 32.98 | 20.42 | ||||||||||||
October
31
|
60.44 | 39.77 | 29.26 | 19.80 |
At
January 8, 2008, the closing price of
our common stock on the Nasdaq Global Select Market was
$39.02.
We
do not
currently pay dividends on our common stock and intend to continue to retain
earnings for working capital, and capital expenditures.
There
were 192 holders of record of our common stock as of January 8,
2008.
During
the period covered by this report, we did not sell any equity securities
that
were not registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended.
The
disclosure under the caption “Equity Compensation Plan Information” is included
in Item 12.
15
Item
6.
|
SELECTED
FINANCIAL
DATA
|
The
Selected Financial Data presented below has been derived from our consolidated
financial statements for the years indicated and should be read in conjunction
with the consolidated financial statements and related notes set forth elsewhere
herein and Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations.
Year
Ended October 31
|
||||||||||||||||||||
2007
|
2006
|
2005
|
2004
|
2003
|
||||||||||||||||
Statement
of Operations Data:
|
(Dollars
in thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Sales
and service fees
|
$ |
188,047
|
$ |
148,517
|
$ |
125,509
|
$ |
99,572
|
$ |
75,532
|
||||||||||
Gross
profit
|
71,082
|
53,325
|
42,558
|
30,298
|
20,822
|
|||||||||||||||
Selling,
general and administrative expenses
|
40,124
|
30,697
|
26,057
|
21,401
|
18,749
|
|||||||||||||||
Restructuring
expense (credit) and other expense, net
|
--
|
--
|
--
|
465
|
(124 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Operating
income
|
30,958
|
22,628
|
16,501
|
8,432
|
2,197
|
|||||||||||||||
Interest
expense (income)
|
(65 | ) |
259
|
355
|
468
|
658
|
||||||||||||||
Net
income
|
20,889
|
15,479
|
16,443
|
6,269
|
462
|
|||||||||||||||
Earnings
per common share- diluted
|
3.24
|
2.42
|
2.60
|
1.04
|
0.08
|
|||||||||||||||
Weighted
average common shares outstanding-diluted
|
6,440
|
6,397
|
6,336
|
6,026
|
5,582
|
As
of October 31
|
||||||||||||||||||||
2007
|
2006
|
2005
|
2004
|
2003
|
||||||||||||||||
Balance
Sheet Data:
|
(Dollars
in thousands)
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Current
assets*
|
$ |
139,265
|
$ |
103,434
|
$ |
73,818
|
$ |
56,472
|
$ |
42,390
|
||||||||||
Current
liabilities
|
63,215
|
44,340
|
30,761
|
30,125
|
20,154
|
|||||||||||||||
Working
capital*
|
76,050
|
59,094
|
43,057
|
26,347
|
22,236
|
|||||||||||||||
Current
ratio
|
2.2
|
2.3
|
2.4
|
1.9
|
2.1
|
|||||||||||||||
Total
assets*
|
163,781
|
125,545
|
94,114
|
73,446
|
57,958
|
|||||||||||||||
Non-current
liabilities*
|
2,963
|
5,830
|
4,409
|
4,866
|
9,063
|
|||||||||||||||
Total
debt
|
--
|
4,010
|
4,136
|
4,600
|
9,222
|
|||||||||||||||
Shareholders’
equity
|
97,603
|
75,375
|
58,944
|
38,455
|
28,741
|
*Certain
information for prior year has
been reclassified to reflect current year presentation.
16
Item
7.
|
MANAGEMENT'S
DISCUSSION AND
ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL
CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS
|
EXECUTIVE
OVERVIEW
Hurco
Companies, Inc., is an industrial technology company operating in a single
segment. We design and produce computerized machine tools, featuring
our proprietary computer control systems and software, for sale through our
own
distribution network to the worldwide metal cutting market. We also
provide software options, control upgrades, accessories and replacement parts
for our products, as well as customer service and training support.
Our
computerized metal cutting machine tools are manufactured in Taiwan to our
specifications by our wholly owned subsidiary, Hurco Manufacturing Limited
(HML), and an affiliate. We sell our products through more than 170
independent agents and distributors in countries throughout North America,
Europe and Asia. We also have our own direct sales and service
organizations in Canada, England, France, Germany, Italy, Singapore and
China.
The
machine tool industry is highly cyclical and changes in demand can occur
abruptly. There was a significant decline in global demand that
continued through the fourth quarter of fiscal 2003. During the
downturn, we took actions to discontinue the production and sale of
underperforming products, refocused on our core product lines and significantly
reduced our operating costs. We also began introducing new product
models in late fiscal 2002 and have continued this process. The
primary drivers of our operational performance in the past three years have
been
improved worldwide demand for our products and increasing acceptance of our
expanded product line.
Approximately
89% of worldwide demand for machine tools comes from outside the United
States. During fiscal 2006 and 2007, more than two-thirds of our
revenues were attributable to customers located abroad. Our sales to
foreign customers are denominated, and payments by those customers are made
in
the prevailing currencies—primarily the Euro and Pound Sterling—in the countries
in which those customers are located, and our product costs are incurred
and
paid primarily in the New Taiwan Dollar and the U.S. Dollar. Changes
in currency exchange rates may have a material effect on our operating results
and consolidated balance sheets as reported under U.S. Generally Accepted
Accounting Principles. For example, when a foreign currency increases
in value relative to the U.S. Dollar, sales made (and expenses incurred)
in that
currency, when translated to U.S. Dollars for reporting in our financial
statements, are higher than would be the case when that currency has a lower
value relative to the U.S. Dollar. In our comparison of
period-to-period results, we discuss not only the increases or decreases
in
those results as reported in our financial statements (which reflect translation
to U.S. Dollars at prevailing exchange rates), but also the effect that changes
in exchange rates had on those results. For additional information on the
impact
of translation of foreign currencies and our hedging practices, see Note
1 of
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Our
high
levels of foreign manufacturing and sales also subject us to cash flow risks
due
to fluctuating currency exchange rates. We seek to mitigate those
risks through the use of various derivative instruments – principally foreign
currency forward exchange contracts.
The
volatility of demand for machine tools can significantly impact our working
capital requirements and, therefore, our cash flow from operations and our
operating profits. Because our products are produced in Taiwan,
manufacturing and ocean transportation lead times require that we schedule
machine tool production based on forecasts of customer orders for a future
period of four or five months. We continually monitor order activity
levels and adjust future production schedules to reflect changes in demand,
but
a significant unexpected decline in customer
orders
from forecasted levels can temporarily increase our finished goods inventories
and our use of working capital.
17
Results
of
Operations
The
following table presents, for the fiscal years indicated, selected items
from
the Consolidated Statements of Income expressed as a percentage of worldwide
sales and service fees and the year-to-year percentage changes in the dollar
amounts of those items.
Percentage
of Revenues
|
Year-to-Year
% Change
|
|||||||||||||||||||
2007
|
2006
|
2005
|
Increase
(Decrease)
|
|||||||||||||||||
07
vs. 06
|
06
vs. 05
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Sales
and service fees
|
100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 26.6 | % | 18.3 | % | ||||||||||
Gross
profit
|
37.8 | % | 35.9 | % | 33.9 | % | 33.3 | % | 25.3 | % | ||||||||||
Selling,
general and Administrative expenses
|
21.3 | % | 20.7 | % | 20.7 | % | 30.7 | % | 17.8 | % | ||||||||||
Operating
income
|
16.5 | % | 15.2 | % | 13.1 | % | 36.8 | % | 37.1 | % | ||||||||||
Interest
expense (income)
|
(0.03 | %) | 0.2 | % | 0.3 | % | (125.1 | %) | (27.0 | %) | ||||||||||
Net
income
|
11.1 | % | 10.4 | % | 13.1 | % | 35.0 | % | (5.9 | %) |
Fiscal
2007 Compared to
Fiscal 2006
Sales
and Service Fees. Sales
and service fees for fiscal 2007 were the highest in our 39-year history,
totaling $188.0 million, an increase of $39.5 million, or 26.6%, over fiscal
2006. Of this increase, $28.5 million was attributable to operational
growth and approximately $11.0 million was due to the favorable effects of
a
weakening U.S. dollar on currency translation. Computerized machine
tool sales, which also were the highest in our history, totaled $165.8 million,
an increase of 28.6% from the $128.9 million recorded in 2006, primarily
driven
by strong worldwide demand for our products and an increase in the percentage
of
sales attributable to higher price machines as a result of our expanded product
line.
Net
Sales and Service Fees by
Geographic Region
The
following table sets forth net sales and service fees by geographic region
for
the years ended October 31, 2007 and 2006 (in thousands):
October
31,
|
Increase
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
2007
|
2006
|
Amount
|
%
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Americas
|
$ |
52,133
|
27.7 | % | $ |
50,563
|
34.0 | % | $ |
1,570
|
3.1 | % | ||||||||||||
Europe
|
125,446
|
66.7 | % |
87,735
|
59.1 | % |
37,711
|
43.0 | % | |||||||||||||||
Asia
Pacific
|
10,468
|
5.6 | % |
10,219
|
6.9 | % |
249
|
2.4 | % | |||||||||||||||
Total
|
$ |
188,047
|
100.0 | % | $ |
148,517
|
100.0 | % | $ |
39,530
|
26.6 | % |
In
the
Americas, sales and service fees increased 3.1% primarily due to improved
mix as
unit sales volumes decreased by 4.7% a result of general weakening in demand
for
the domestic machine tool market.
European
sales and service fees increased by 43.0%, which includes a favorable impact
due
to changing currency rates of $10.5 million, or 11.9%. Unit sales
increased by 28.0% in fiscal 2007 compared to fiscal 2006 as a result of
a
strong European market and continued expansion into eastern European
markets. The remaining 15.0% of growth in European sales and service
fees was primarily derived by continued demand for our higher end VMX product
line.
Sales
and
service fees in the Asia Pacific region increased by 2.4%, due to increased
volume of larger higher priced machines, partially offset by a 10.1% decline
in
overall unit volume. The effect of a weaker U.S. Dollar when
translating foreign sales for financial reporting purposes had a favorable
impact of approximately $539,000, or 5.3%, on this region’s sales comparison for
the full year.
18
Net
Sales and Service Fees by Product
Category
The
following table sets forth net sales and service fees by product category
for
the years ended October 31, 2007 and 2006 (in thousands):
October
31,
|
Increase
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
2007
|
2006
|
Amount
|
%
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Computerized
Machine Tools
|
$ |
165,832
|
88.2 | % | $ |
128,946
|
86.8 | % | $ |
36,886
|
28.6 | % | ||||||||||||
Service
Fees, Parts and Other
|
22,215
|
11.8 | % |
19,571
|
13.2 | % |
2,644
|
13.5 | % | |||||||||||||||
Total
|
$ |
188,047
|
100.0 | % | $ |
148,517
|
100.0 | % | $ |
39,530
|
26.6 | % |
Sales
of computerized machine tools
totaled $165.8 million in fiscal 2007, an increase of $36.9 million, or 28.6%,
primarily driven by a strong European market and continued demand for our
higher
end VMX product line.
Orders
and
Backlog. New order bookings in fiscal 2007, were $199.0
million, an increase of $44.2 million, or 28.6%, over the prior
year. New order bookings increased by 6.1%, 43.6% and 5.2% in the
Americas, Europe and Asia Pacific, respectively. Europe was the
primary contributor to the increased orders, driven by a strong market,
expansion into new markets and favorable product mix. Unit orders
increased 26.1% in Europe and decreased by 6.7% and 10.7% in North America
and
Asia Pacific, respectively. The reduction in North America was
primarily due to a general weakening in demand for the domestic machine tool
market, while Asia Pacific orders were down slightly due to continued
development of the selling channels in China and India. Orders for
fiscal 2007 compared to fiscal 2006 were favorably affected by approximately
$11.7 million, or 7.5%, due to changes in currency exchange
rates. Backlog was $29.4 million at October 31, 2007, compared to
$16.1 million at October 31, 2006. We do not believe backlog is a
useful measure of past performance or indicative of future
performance. Backlog orders as of October 31, 2007 are expected to be
fulfilled in fiscal 2008.
Gross
Margin. Gross margin for fiscal 2007 was 37.8%, an increase
over the 35.9% margin realized in the corresponding 2006 period, reflecting
the
impact of higher sales and improved mix.
Operating
Expenses. Selling, general and administrative expenses for
fiscal 2007 of $40.1 million increased $9.4 million, or 30.7%, from those
of
fiscal 2006 and includes the unfavorable effect of currency translation of
$1.5
million, or 5.0%. The increase was attributable to a $571,000
increase in product development expenses, a $4.5 million increase in global
sales and marketing expenditures and a $4.4 million increase in general and
administrative expenses. The increased global sales and marketing
expenditures include increased expenses for local trade shows, increased
European agent sales commissions and marketing expenses for expansion of
sales
into emerging markets. General and administrative expenses increased
primarily as a result of incentive compensation, incremental healthcare related
benefits, and increases in other miscellaneous administrative
expenses.
Operating
Income. Operating income for fiscal 2007 totaled $31.0
million, or 16.5% of sales, compared to $22.6 million or 15.2% of sales,
in
fiscal 2006.
Other
Income
(Expense). Other income (expense), net in fiscal 2007 relates
primarily to increased income from investments in minority-owned contract
manufacturers in Taiwan accounted for under the equity method, tax deferred
income earned on investments of cash, and currency exchange gains on
inter-company receivables and payables denominated in foreign currencies,
net of
gains or losses on related forward contracts.
19
Provision
for Income
Taxes. The effective tax rate for fiscal 2007 was 36.2%,
compared to 33.0% for the same period in the prior year. The 2006
lower effective tax rate was primarily due to a deduction generated from
a
change in tax code.
Net
Income. Net
income for fiscal 2007 was $20.9 million, or $3.24 per share, which is an
increase of 35.0% over fiscal 2006 net income of $15.5 million, or $2.42
per
share.
Fiscal
2006 Compared to
Fiscal 2005
Sales
and Service Fees. Sales
and service fees for fiscal 2006 were $148.5 million, an increase of $23.0
million, or 18.3%, over fiscal 2005, of which $24.6 million was attributable
to
operational growth offset by approximately $1.6 million of unfavorable effects
of currency translation. Computerized machine tool sales totaled
$128.9 million, an increase of 20.2% from the $107.3 million recorded in
2005,
primarily driven by strong worldwide demand for our
products. Approximately $4.0 million, or 17.6%, of the increase in
sales of computerized machine tools was the result of sales of our lathe
machine
line, which we introduced in the first quarter of fiscal 2005.
Net
Sales and Service Fees by
Geographic Region
The
following table sets forth net sales and service fees by geographic region
for
the years ended October 31, 2006 and 2005 (in thousands):
October
31,
|
Increase
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
2006
|
2005
|
Amount
|
%
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Americas
|
$ |
50,563
|
34.0 | % | $ |
43,194
|
34.4 | % | $ |
7,369
|
17.1 | % | ||||||||||||
Europe
|
87,735
|
59.1 | % |
75,225
|
59.9 | % |
12,510
|
16.6 | % | |||||||||||||||
Asia
Pacific
|
10,219
|
6.9 | % |
7,090
|
5.7 | % |
3,129
|
44.1 | % | |||||||||||||||
Total
|
$ |
148,517
|
100.0 | % | $ |
125,509
|
100.0 | % | $ |
23,008
|
18.3 | % |
In
the
Americas, sales and service fees increased $7.4 million, or 17.1%, due to
the
growth of our VM product line combined with continued demand for our higher
end
VMX product line and incremental sales of the lathe product
line. Lathe unit shipments increased 15.0% in fiscal 2006 compared to
fiscal 2005. Unit shipments of vertical machining centers (which
exclude lathes) increased approximately 28.1% in fiscal 2006 compared to
16.8%
for similar products in the United States as reported by the Association
for
Manufacturing Technology.
In
Europe, our sales and service fees increased by $12.5 million, or 16.6%,
which
includes an unfavorable impact due to changes in currency rates of $1.8 million
or 2.4%. Unit sales increased 19.2% when comparing fiscal 2006 to
2005.
Sales
and
service fees in the Asia Pacific region were not significantly affected by
changes in currency exchange rates, but did reflect improved activity in
Asian
markets. Shipments of our lathe product line increased 9.0% and
shipments of vertical machining centers increased 48.7% in fiscal 2006 compared
to fiscal 2005.
20
Net
Sales and Service Fees by Product
Category
The
following table sets forth net sales and service fees by product category
for
the years ended October 31, 2006 and 2005 (in thousands):
October
31,
|
Increase
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
2006
|
2005
|
Amount
|
%
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Computerized Machine
Tools
|
$ |
128,946
|
86.8 | % | $ |
107,313
|
85.5 | % | $ |
21,633
|
20.2 | % | ||||||||||||
Service
Fees, Parts and Other
|
19,571
|
13.2 | % |
18,196
|
14.5 | % |
1,375
|
7.6 | % | |||||||||||||||
Total
|
$ |
148,517
|
100.0 | % | $ |
125,509
|
100.0 | % | $ |
23,008
|
18.3 | % |
Sales
of
computerized machine tools totaled $128.9 million in fiscal 2006, an increase
of
$21.6 million, or 20.2%, primarily driven by strong worldwide demand for
our
existing products. Approximately $4.0 million of the increase in
sales of computerized machine tools was a result of sales of our lathe machine
line, which was introduced in the first quarter of fiscal 2005.
Orders
and
Backlog. New order bookings for fiscal 2006 totaled $154.8
million, an increase of $31.9 million, or 26.0%, as compared to $122.9 million
recorded in fiscal 2005. New order bookings increased by 17.6%, 27.4%
and 63.3% in the Americas, Europe and Asia Pacific,
respectively. Unit orders were also strong in all geographic regions
in fiscal 2006. Unit orders increased 33.4%, 29.4% and 66.7% in North America,
Europe and Asia Pacific, respectively. Orders for fiscal 2006
compared to fiscal 2005 were unfavorably affected by approximately $1.7 million
due to changes in currency exchange rates. Backlog was $16.1 million at October
31, 2006, compared to $10.0 million at October 31, 2005. We do not
believe backlog is a useful measure of past performance or indicative of
future
performance. Backlog orders as of October 31, 2006 are expected to be
fulfilled in fiscal 2007.
Gross
Margin. Gross margin for fiscal 2006 was 35.9%, an increase
over the 33.9% margin realized in the corresponding 2005 period, due principally
to the increased sales volume.
Operating
Expenses. Selling, general and administrative expenses for
fiscal 2006 of $30.7 million increased $4.6 million, or 17.6%, from those
of
fiscal 2005. The increase was primarily due to a $2.6 million
increase in global sales and marketing expenditures and a $2.0 million increase
in general and administrative expenses. The increased global sales
and marketing expenditures include increased expenses for local and
international trade shows, increased European agent sales commissions and
marketing expenses for expansion of sales into emerging markets. The principal
factor contributing to the increase in general and administrative expenses
was
consulting and audit fees for compliance with the internal control-reporting
requirement of Section 404 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002, which became
applicable to us in fiscal 2006.
Operating
Income. Operating income for fiscal 2006 totaled $22.6
million, or 15.2% of sales, compared to $16.5 million or 13.1% of sales,
in the
prior year.
Other
Income
(Expense). Other income (expense), net decrease in fiscal 2006
relates primarily to currency exchange losses on inter-company receivables
and
payables denominated in foreign currencies, net of gains or losses on related
forward contracts.
Provision
for Income
Taxes. We incurred income tax expense of $7.6 million in
fiscal 2006. In contrast we had no income tax expense in 2005
primarily due to the utilization of net operating loss carryforwards of
approximately $9.8 million.
Net
Income. Net
income for fiscal 2006 was $15.5 million, or $2.42 per share, compared to
$16.4
million, or $2.60 per share, in the prior year. The improvement in
net income was primarily due to increased sales of our computerized machine
tools and improved gross margins, partially offset by increased operating
expenses and tax provision.
21
Liquidity
and Capital
Resources
At
October 31, 2007, we had cash and cash equivalents of $39.8 million compared
to
$29.8 million at October 31, 2006. Approximately 58.0% of the $39.8
million of cash and cash equivalents is denominated in U.S.
Dollars. The remaining balances are denominated in the local
currencies of our various foreign entities and are subject to fluctuations
in
currency exchange rates.
Working
capital, excluding cash and short-term debt, was $36.3 million at October
31,
2007, compared to $29.4 million at October 31, 2006. The increase in
working capital relates to higher inventory levels to support increased order
volume, particularly for our larger machines. We expect our operating working
capital requirements will increase in fiscal 2008 as our sales and service
fees
increase. We will fund these increased requirements with cash flow
from operations and borrowings under our bank credit
facilities. Capital expenditures were $4.5 million in fiscal 2007,
$3.3 million in fiscal 2006, and $3.0 million in fiscal 2005. Capital
expenditures were primarily for an integrated computer system, software
development projects and purchases of equipment related to expansion of our
manufacturing facilities. We funded these expenditures with cash flow
from operations.
As
of
October 31, 2007 we had no debt or borrowings outstanding under our domestic
and
European bank credit facilities. The $4.0 million mortgage balance
outstanding as of October 31, 2006 was paid in full on April 30,
2007.
On
December 7, 2007, we entered into a new domestic credit agreement that provides
us with a $30.0 million unsecured revolving credit facility and a separate
letter of credit facility in the amount of 100.0 million New Taiwan
Dollars. On the same day, we entered into a Taiwan revolving credit
agreement of 100.0 million New Taiwan Dollars which is an uncommitted demand
credit facility. In the event the Taiwan facility is not available, the Taiwan
letter of credit facility from the domestic agreement would enable us to
provide
credit enhancement to a replacement lender in Taiwan. We also entered into
a
£1.0 million revolving facility agreement in the United Kingdom. The new
domestic facility and U.K. facility will mature on December 7, 2012. The
new
domestic agreement and new U.K. agreement replace our prior agreements, which
would have matured on January 31, 2008. We incurred no early termination
or prepayment penalties in connection with replacement of these prior
facilities. See Note 4 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for
further
discussions on debt.
On
July
12, 2007, we filed a registration statement on Form S-3 with the SEC utilizing
the “shelf” registration process. The registration statement was
declared effective on July 26, 2007. This registration statement
allows us to offer and sell a variety of securities, including common stock,
preferred stock, warrants, depositary shares and debt securities, up to an
aggregate amount of $200.0 million, if and when authorized by the Board of
Directors.
Although
we have not made any significant acquisitions in the recent past, we continue
to
receive information on businesses and assets, including intellectual property
assets that are being sold. Should attractive opportunities arise, we
believe that our earnings, cash flow from operations, borrowings under our
bank
credit facilities, and the sale of securities from our shelf registration
would
provide sufficient resources to finance a possible acquisition.
22
Contractual
Obligations and
Commitments
The
following is a table of contractual obligations and commitments as of October
31, 2007 (all amounts in thousands):
Payments
Due by
Period
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Total
|
Less
than 1 Year
|
1-3
Years
|
3-5
Years
|
More
than 5 Years
|
||||||||||||||||
Operating
Leases
|
$ |
4,162
|
$ |
1,710
|
$ |
1,683
|
$ |
761
|
$ |
8
|
||||||||||
Deferred
Credits and Other
|
1,007
|
--
|
--
|
--
|
1,007
|
|||||||||||||||
Total
|
$ |
5,169
|
$ |
1,710
|
$ |
1,683
|
$ |
761
|
$ |
1,015
|
In
addition to the contractual obligations and commitments disclosed above,
we also
have a variety of other obligations for the procurement of materials and
services, none of which subject us to any material non-cancelable
commitments. While some of these obligations arise under long-term
supply agreements, we are not committed under these agreements to accept
or pay
for requirements that are not needed to meet our production needs. We
have no material minimum purchase commitments or “take-or-pay” type agreements
or arrangements.
We
expect
capital spending in fiscal 2008 to be approximately $5.6 million, which includes
investments for further expansion of our manufacturing operations, capitalized
software and costs to continue implementation of our integrated computer
system.
Off
Balance Sheet
Arrangements
From
time
to time, our subsidiaries guarantee third party payment obligations in
connection with the sale of machines to customers that use
financing. At October 31, 2007, 54 such guarantees were outstanding
totaling approximately $1.6 million. Upon shipment, the customer has
the risk of ownership. The customer does not obtain title until the
machine is paid in full. We believe that the proceeds obtained from
liquidation of the machine would cover any payments required by the
guarantee.
Critical
Accounting
Estimates
Our
discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations
is
based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared
in
accordance with U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. The
preparation of financial statements in conformity with those accounting
principles require us to make judgments and estimates that affect the amounts
reported in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying
notes. Those judgments and estimates have a significant effect on the
financial statements because they result primarily from the need to make
estimates about the effects of matters that are inherently
uncertain. Actual results could differ from those
estimates. We frequently re-evaluate our judgments and estimates that
are based upon historical experience and on various other assumptions that
are
believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. We have evaluated
our significant accounting estimates and disclosed them in Note 1 of the
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements.
23
Item
7a.
|
QUANTITATIVE
AND
QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET
RISKS
|
Interest
Rate
Risk
We
had no
borrowings outstanding under our bank credit facilities at October 31, 2007
and
have not borrowed from our bank credit facilities since February
2005. Note 4 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements set forth
the interest rates related to our current credit facilities.
Foreign
Currency Exchange
Risk
In
fiscal
2007, more than two-thirds of our revenues, including export sales, were
derived
from foreign markets. All of our computerized machine tools and
computer control systems, as well as certain proprietary service parts, are
sourced by our U.S.-based engineering and manufacturing division and re-invoiced
to our foreign sales and service subsidiaries, primarily in their functional
currencies.
Our
products are sourced from foreign suppliers or built to our specifications
by
our wholly owned subsidiary in Taiwan or overseas contract
manufacturer. These purchases are predominantly in foreign currencies
and in some cases our arrangements with these suppliers include foreign currency
risk sharing agreements, which reduce (but do not eliminate) the effects
of
currency fluctuations on product costs. The predominant portion of
our exchange rate risk associated with product purchases relates to the New
Taiwan Dollar.
We
enter
into foreign currency forward exchange contracts from time to time to hedge
the
cash flow risk related to forecasted inter-company sales and forecasted
inter-company and third party purchases denominated in, or based on, foreign
currencies (primarily the Euro, Pound Sterling and New Taiwan
Dollar). We also enter into foreign currency forward exchange
contracts to protect against the effects of foreign currency fluctuations
on
receivables and payables denominated in foreign currencies. We do not
speculate in the financial markets and, therefore, do not enter into these
contracts for trading purposes.
Forward
contracts for the sale or purchase of foreign currencies as of October 31,
2007
which are designated as cash flow hedges under SFAS No. 133 were as
follows:
Contract
Amount at Forward Rates in U.S. Dollars
|
||||||||||
Forward
Contracts
|
Notional
Amount in Foreign Currency
|
Weighted
Avg. Forward Rate
|
Contract
Date
|
October
31, 2007
|
Maturity
Dates
|
|||||
Sale
Contracts:
|
||||||||||
Euro
|
34,000,000
|
$1.3728
|
$46,675,200
|
$49,308,127
|
Nov
2007-Oct 2008
|
|||||
Sterling
|
3,985,000
|
$1.9926
|
$ 7,940,511
|
$ 8,236,052
|
Nov
2007-Oct 2008
|
|||||
Purchase
Contracts:
|
||||||||||
New
Taiwan Dollar
|
895,000,000
|
32.33*
|
$27,683,266
|
$28,060,651
|
Nov
2007-Oct 2008
|
*NT
Dollars per U.S. Dollar
24
We
also
enter into foreign currency forward exchange contracts to protect against
the
effects of foreign currency fluctuations on receivables and payables denominated
in foreign currencies. These derivative instruments are not
designated as hedges under SFAS 133, “Accounting Standards for Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities.” The forward contracts for the
sale or purchase of those currencies related to receivables and payables
as of
October 31, 2007 are as follows:
Contract
Amount at Forward Rates in U.S. Dollars
|
||||||||||
Forward
Contracts
|
Notional
Amount in Foreign Currency
|
Weighted
Avg. Forward Rate
|
Contract
Date
|
October
31, 2007
|
Maturity
Dates
|
|||||
Sale
Contracts:
|
||||||||||
Euro
|
16,677,079
|
$1.4187
|
$23,659,772
|
$24,168,767
|
Nov
2007-Dec 2007
|
|||||
Singapore
Dollar
|
10,247,257
|
$1.4887
|
$ 6,883,359
|
$ 7,105,725
|
Nov
2007-Jan 2008
|
|||||
Sterling
|
1,535,391
|
$2.0417
|
$ 3,134,808
|
$ 3,190,363
|
Nov
2007-Dec 2007
|
|||||
Purchase
Contracts:
|
||||||||||
New
Taiwan Dollar
|
555,390,000
|
32.37*
|
$17,157,553
|
$17,259,035
|
Nov
2007-Jan 2008
|
* NT
Dollars per U.S. Dollar
25
Management’s
Annual Report on
Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
To the
Shareholders
and
Board
of
Directors
of
Hurco
Companies, Inc.:
Management
of Hurco Companies, Inc. (the “Company”), has assessed the effectiveness of
internal controls over financial reporting as of October 31, 2007, based
on
criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission
(COSO). Management is responsible for these financial statements,
for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and
for its
assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial
reporting.
Because
of its inherent limitations, the Company’s internal control over financial
reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections
of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk
that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or
that
the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may
deteriorate.
In
management’s opinion, the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting
as of October 31, 2007, are effective based on the criteria specified
above.
Our
independent registered accounting firm, Crowe Chizek and Company LLC, who
also
audited our consolidated financial statements, audited the effectiveness
of our
internal control over financial reporting. Crowe Chizek and Company
LLC has issued their attestation report, which is included in Part II, Item
8 of
this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
/s/
Michael Doar
Michael
Doar,
Chairman
of the Board & Chief Executive Officer
/s/
John
G. Oblazney
John
G.
Oblazney,
Vice
President & Chief Financial Officer
/s/
Sonja
K. McClelland
Sonja
K.
McClelland
Corporate
Controller, Assistant Secretary
(Principal
Accounting Officer)
Indianapolis,
Indiana
January
10, 2008
26
Item
8.
|
FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
AND SUPPLEMENTARY
DATA
|
Report
of Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm
To the
Shareholders
and
Board
of
Directors
of
Hurco
Companies, Inc.
We
have
audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Hurco Companies,
Inc.
and Subsidiaries as of October 31, 2007 and 2006, and the related
consolidated statements of income, changes in shareholders’ equity and cash
flows for the years ended October 31, 2007 and 2006. In
connection with our audits of the consolidated financial statements, we also
have audited the consolidated financial statement schedule as it relates
to the
fiscal year 2007 and 2006 information which is listed in the index under
Item
15. We also have audited the Company’s internal control over
financial reporting as of October 31, 2007, based on criteria established
in
Internal Control – Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Hurco Companies,
Inc. management is responsible for these financial statements and the financial
statement schedule, for maintaining effective internal control over financial
reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control
over
financial reporting included in the accompanying management’s annual report on
internal control over financial reporting. Our responsibility is to
express an opinion on these financial statements and the financial statement
schedule and an opinion on the company’s internal control over financial
reporting based on our audits.
We
conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require
that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about
whether
the financial statements are free of material misstatement and whether effective
internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material
respects. Our audits of the financial statements included examining,
on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the
financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant
estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting
included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial
reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing
and
evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based
on
the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other
procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We
believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our
opinions.
A
company's internal control over financial reporting is a process designed
to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting
and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance
with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. A company's
internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures
that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail,
accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets
of
the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded
as
necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with
U.S.
generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures
of
the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management
and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding
prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition
of the company's assets that could have a material effect on the financial
statements.
Because
of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may
not
prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation
of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls
may
become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of
compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
27
In
our
opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present
fairly,
in all material respects, the financial position of Hurco Companies, Inc
and
Subsidiaries as of October 31, 2007 and 2006, and the results of their
operations and their cash flows for the years ended October 31, 2007 and
2006 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States of America. Also, in our opinion, the related consolidated
financial statement schedule as it relates to the fiscal year 2007 and 2006
information, when considered in relation to the basic 2007 and 2006 consolidated
financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all material
respects, the information set forth therein. Also, in our opinion,
Hurco Companies, Inc. and Subsidiaries maintained, in all material respects,
effective internal control over financial reporting as of October 31, 2007,
based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued
by
the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission
(COSO).
/s/Crowe
Chizek and Company LLC
Indianapolis,
Indiana
January
10, 2008
28
Report
of Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm
To the
Shareholders
and
Board
of
Directors
of
Hurco
Companies, Inc.:
In
our
opinion, the consolidated financial statements listed in the accompanying
index appearing under Item 15(a)(1) present fairly, in all material
respects, the results of operations and cash flows of Hurco Companies, Inc.
and
its subsidiaries for the year ended October 31, 2005 in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America. In addition, in our opinion, the financial statement
schedule listed in the accompanying index appearing under Item 15(a) (2)
presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein
when read in conjunction with the related consolidated financial
statements. These financial statements and financial statement
schedule are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and
financial statement schedule based on our audits. We conducted our
audit of these statements in accordance with the standards of the Public
Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require
that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether
the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit
includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and
disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles
used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall
financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides
a reasonable basis for our opinion.
/s/PricewaterhouseCoopers
LLP
Indianapolis,
Indiana
January
18, 2006
29
HURCO
COMPANIES,
INC.
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF
INCOME
Year
Ended October 31
|
||||||||||||
2007
|
2006
|
2005
|
||||||||||
(Dollars
in thousands, except per share amounts)
|
||||||||||||
Sales
and service
fees
|
$ | 188,047 | $ | 148,517 | $ | 125,509 | ||||||
Cost
of sales and service
|
116,965 | 95,192 | 82,951 | |||||||||
Gross
profit
|
71,082 | 53,325 | 42,558 | |||||||||
Selling,
general and administrative expenses
|
40,124 | 30,697 | 26,057 | |||||||||
Operating
income
|
30,958 | 22,628 | 16,501 | |||||||||
Interest
expense (income)
|
(65 | ) | 259 | 355 | ||||||||
Earnings
from equity investments
|
1,048 | 865 | 418 | |||||||||
Other
income (expense), net
|
694 | (120 | ) | (482 | ) | |||||||
Income
before income taxes
|
32,765 | 23,114 | 16,082 | |||||||||
Provision
for (benefit from) income taxes (Note 6)
|
11,876 | 7,635 | (361 | ) | ||||||||
Net
income
|
$ | 20,889 | $ | 15,479 | $ | 16,443 | ||||||
Earnings
per common share – basic
|
$ | 3.27 | $ | 2.45 | $ | 2.66 | ||||||
Weighted
average common shares outstanding – basic
|
6,382 | 6,317 | 6,171 | |||||||||
Earnings
per common share – diluted
|
$ | 3.24 | $ | 2.42 | $ | 2.60 | ||||||
Weighted
average common shares outstanding – diluted
|
6,440 | 6,397 | 6,336 |
The
accompanying notes are an
integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
30
HURCO
COMPANIES,
INC.
CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE
SHEETS
ASSETS
As
of October
31
|
||||||||
2007
|
2006
|
|||||||
Current
assets:
|
(Dollars
in thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
$ | 39,760 | $ | 29,846 | ||||
Accounts
receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts of $751 in
2007 and $635 in 2006
|
25,645 | 22,248 | ||||||
Inventories
|
61,121 | 43,343 | ||||||
Deferred
tax assets, net
|
8,258 | 5,320 | ||||||
Other
|
4,481 | 2,677 | ||||||
Total
current assets
|
139,265 | 103,434 | ||||||
Property
and equipment:
|
||||||||
Land
|
776 | 761 | ||||||
Building
|
7,135 | 7,234 | ||||||
Machinery
and equipment
|
13,629 | 12,952 | ||||||
Leasehold
improvements
|
1,473 | 1,147 | ||||||
23,013 | 22,094 | |||||||
Less
accumulated depreciation and amortization
|
(11,617 | ) | (12,944 | ) | ||||
11,396 | 9,150 | |||||||
Software
development costs, less accumulated amortization
|
5,960 | 5,580 | ||||||
Investments
and other assets
|
7,160 | 7,381 | ||||||
$ | 163,781 | $ | 125,545 | |||||
LIABILITIES
AND SHAREHOLDERS’
EQUITY
|
||||||||
Current
liabilities:
|
||||||||
Accounts
payable
|
$ | 33,056 | $ | 24,482 | ||||
Accounts
payable-related parties
|
2,430 | 2,123 | ||||||
Accrued
expenses and other
|
25,280 | 15,673 | ||||||
Accrued
warranty expenses
|
2,449 | 1,926 | ||||||
Current
portion of long-term debt
|
-- | 136 | ||||||
Total
current liabilities
|
63,215 | 44,340 | ||||||
Non-current
liabilities:
|
||||||||
Long-term
debt
|
-- | 3,874 | ||||||
Deferred
tax liability, net
|
1,956 | 1,431 | ||||||
Deferred
credits and other
|
1,007 | 525 | ||||||
2,963 | 5,830 | |||||||
Commitments
and contingencies
(Notes 10 and 11)
|
||||||||
Shareholders’
equity:
|
||||||||
Preferred
stock: no par value per share, 1,000,000 shares authorized, no
shares
issued
|
-- | -- | ||||||
Common
stock: no par value, $.10 stated value per share, 12,500,000 shares
authorized, 6,392,220 and 6,346,520 shares issued and outstanding
in 2007
and 2006, respectively
|
639 | 635 | ||||||
Additional
paid-in capital
|
50,971 | 50,011 | ||||||
Retained
earnings
|
49,369 | 28,480 | ||||||
Accumulated
other comprehensive income (loss)
|
(3,376 | ) | (3,751 | ) | ||||
Total
shareholders’ equity
|
97,603 | 75,375 | ||||||
$ | 163,781 | $ | 125,545 |
The
accompanying notes are an
integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
31
HURCO
COMPANIES,
INC.
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CASH
FLOWS
Year
Ended October 31
|
||||||||||||
2007
|
2006
|
2005
|
||||||||||
Cash
flows from operating
activities:
|
(Dollars
in thousands)
|
|||||||||||
Net
income
|
$ |
20,889
|
$ |
15,479
|
$ |
16,443
|
||||||
Adjustments
to reconcile net income to Net cash provided by operating
activities:
|
||||||||||||
Provision
for doubtful accounts
|
116
|
(207 | ) |
119
|
||||||||
Deferred
Tax Provision
|
1,216
|
491
|
(4,389 | ) | ||||||||
Equity
in income of affiliates
|
(1,048 | ) | (865 | ) | (418 | ) | ||||||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
2,106
|
1,504
|
1,331
|
|||||||||
Tax
benefit from exercise of stock options (prior to Adoption of
SFAS
123(R)
|
--
|
--
|
1,146
|
|||||||||
Change
in assets/liabilities
|
||||||||||||
(Increase)
decrease in accounts receivable
|
(1,742 | ) | (1,312 | ) | (3,606 | ) | ||||||
(Increase)
decrease in inventories
|
(14,116 | ) | (12,726 | ) | (660 | ) | ||||||
Increase
(decrease) in accounts payable
|
7,821
|
9,318
|
(1,191 | ) | ||||||||
Increase
(decrease) in accrued expenses
|
6,474
|
3,423
|
2,653
|
|||||||||
Other
|
(7,523 | ) | (1,059 | ) |
549
|
|||||||
Net
cash provided by operating
activities
|
14,193
|
14,046
|
11,977
|
|||||||||
Cash
flows from investing
activities:
|
||||||||||||
Proceeds
from sale of property and equipment
|
--
|
16
|
--
|
|||||||||
Purchase
of property and equipment
|
(3,325 | ) | (1,212 | ) | (1,879 | ) | ||||||
Software
development costs
|
(1,185 | ) | (2,089 | ) | (1,161 | ) | ||||||
Change
in restricted cash
|
--
|
--
|
277
|
|||||||||
Other
proceeds (investments)
|
1,898
|
(335 | ) |
224
|
||||||||
Net
cash used for investing
activities
|
(2,612 | ) | (3,620 | ) | (2,539 | ) | ||||||
Cash
flows from financing
activities:
|
||||||||||||
Advances
on bank credit facilities
|
--
|
--
|
4,977
|
|||||||||
Repayments
on bank credit facilities
|
--
|
--
|
(5,124 | ) | ||||||||
Repayments
of term debt
|
--
|
--
|
(200 | ) | ||||||||
Repayment
of first mortgage
|
(4,010 | ) | (126 | ) | (117 | ) | ||||||
Tax
benefit from exercise of stock options
|
298
|
744
|
--
|
|||||||||
Proceeds
from exercise of common stock options
|
186
|
562
|
797
|
|||||||||
Net
cash provided by (used for)
financing activities
|
(3,526 | ) |
1,180
|
333
|
||||||||
Effect
of exchange rate changes
on cash
|
1,859
|
681
|
(461 | ) | ||||||||
Net
increase in
cash
|
9,914
|
12,287
|
9,310
|
|||||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at
beginning of year
|
29,846
|
17,559
|
8,249
|
|||||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at
end of year
|
$ |
39,760
|
$ |
29,846
|
$ |
17,559
|
||||||
Supplemental
disclosures:
|
||||||||||||
Cash
paid for:
|
||||||||||||
Interest
|
$ |
157
|
$ |
314
|
$ |
331
|
||||||
Income
taxes
|
$ |
9,971
|
$ |
3,920
|
$ |
1,509
|
||||||
The
accompanying notes are an
integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
32
HURCO
COMPANIES,
INC.
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN
SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
Common
Stock
|
Additional
|
Accumulated
Other
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars
in thousands, except
Shares Issued and Outstanding)
|
Shares
Issued
&
Outstanding
|
Amount
|
Paid-In
Capital
|
Retained
Earnings
(Deficit)
|
Comprehensive
Income
(Loss)
|
Total
|
||||||||||||||||||
Balances,
October 31,
2004
|
6,019,594 | $ | 602 | $ | 46,778 | $ | (3,442 | ) | $ | (5,483 | ) | $ | 38,455 | |||||||||||
Net
income
|
-- | -- | -- | 16,443 | -- | 16,443 | ||||||||||||||||||
Translation
of foreign currency financial statements
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | (838 | ) | (838 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Unrealized
gain of derivative instruments, net of tax
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | 2,941 | 2,941 | ||||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive
income
|
18,546 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Exercise
of common stock options
|
200,626 | 20 | 777 | -- | -- | 797 | ||||||||||||||||||
Tax
benefit from exercise of stock options
|
-- | -- | 1,146 | -- | -- | 1,146 | ||||||||||||||||||
Balances,
October 31,
2005
|
6,220,220 | 622 | 48,701 | 13,001 | (3,380 | ) | 58,944 | |||||||||||||||||
Net
income
|
-- | -- | -- | 15,479 | -- | 15,479 | ||||||||||||||||||
Translation
of foreign currency financial statements
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | 1,288 | 1,288 | ||||||||||||||||||
Unrealized
loss of derivative instruments, net of tax
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | (1,659 | ) | (1,659 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive
income
|
15,108 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Exercise
of common stock options
|
126,300 | 13 | 549 | -- | -- | 562 | ||||||||||||||||||
Tax
benefit from exercise of stock options
|
-- | -- | 744 | -- | -- | 744 | ||||||||||||||||||
Stock-based
compensation expense
|
-- | -- | 17 | -- | -- | 17 | ||||||||||||||||||
Balances,
October 31,
2006
|
6,346,520 | 635 | 50,011 | 28,480 | (3,751 | ) | 75,375 | |||||||||||||||||
Net
income
|
-- | -- | -- | 20,889 | -- | 20,889 | ||||||||||||||||||
Translation
of foreign currency financial statements
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | 2,568 | 2,568 | ||||||||||||||||||
Unrealized
loss of derivative instruments, net of tax
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | (2,193 | ) | (2,193 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive
income
|
21,264 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Exercise
of common stock options
|
45,700 | 4 | 182 | -- | -- | 186 | ||||||||||||||||||
Tax
benefit from exercise of stock options
|
-- | -- | 298 | -- | -- | 298 | ||||||||||||||||||
Stock-based
compensation expense
|
-- | -- | 480 | -- | -- | 480 | ||||||||||||||||||
Balances,
October 31,
2007
|
6,392,220 | $ | 639 | $ | 50,971 | $ | 49,369 | $ | (3,376 | ) | $ | 97,603 | ||||||||||||
The
accompanying notes are an
integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
33
HURCO
COMPANIES,
INC.
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
1. SUMMARY
OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Consolidation. The
consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Hurco Companies,
Inc.
(an Indiana corporation) and its wholly owned and controlled
subsidiaries. We have a 35% ownership interest in one affiliate
accounted for using the equity method. Our investment in that
affiliate was approximately $2.4 million and $2.0 million as of October 31,
2007
and 2006, respectively. Our investment is included in Investments and Other
Assets on the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets. Intercompany
accounts and transactions have been eliminated.
Statements
of Cash
Flows. We consider all highly liquid investments purchased
with maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents. Cash
flows from hedges are classified consistent with the items being
hedged.
Translation
of Foreign
Currencies. All balance sheet accounts of non-U.S.
subsidiaries are translated at the exchange rate as of the end of the year
and
recorded as a component of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
in
shareholders' equity. Income and expenses are translated at the
average exchange rates during the year. Cumulative foreign currency
translation adjustments as of October 31, 2007, were a net loss of $732,000
and
are included in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss). These foreign
currency translation adjustments are recorded net of tax as they relate to
permanent investments in international subsidiaries. Foreign currency
transaction gains and losses are recorded as income or expense as
incurred.
Hedging. We
periodically enter into foreign currency forward exchange contracts to hedge
certain forecasted inter-company sales and forecasted inter-company and third
party purchases of product denominated in foreign currencies (primarily Pound
Sterling, Euro and New Taiwan Dollar). The purpose of these
instruments is to mitigate the risk that the U.S. Dollar net cash inflows
and
outflows resulting from the sales and purchases denominated in foreign
currencies will be adversely affected by changes in exchange
rates. These forward contracts have been designated as cash flow
hedge instruments, and are recorded in the Consolidated Balance Sheets at
fair
value in Other Current Assets and Accrued Expenses. Gains and losses
resulting from changes in the fair value of these hedge contracts are deferred
in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) and recognized as an adjustment
to cost of sales in the period that the sale of the related hedged item is
recognized, thereby providing an offsetting economic impact against the
corresponding change in the U.S. Dollar value of the inter-company sale or
purchase item being hedged.
At
October 31, 2007, we had approximately $2.6 million of losses, net of tax,
related to cash flow hedges deferred in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income
(Loss). Of this amount, $1.6 million represents unrealized losses, net of
tax,
related to future cash flow hedge instruments that remain subject to currency
fluctuation risk. These deferred losses will be recorded as an
adjustment to Cost of Sales in the periods through October 31, 2008, in which
the sale of the related hedged item is recognized, as described
above. At October 31, 2006, we had $448,000 of losses, net of tax,
related to cash flow hedges deferred in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income
(Loss). Net losses on cash flow hedge contracts, which we
reclassified from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) to Cost of
Sales, were $1.9 million for the period ended October 31, 2007, compared
to net
gains of $698,000 and net losses of $747,000 reclassified in the periods
ending
October 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
34
HURCO
COMPANIES,
INC.
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS – Continued
We
also
enter into foreign currency forward exchange contracts to protect against
the
effects of foreign currency fluctuations on receivables and payables denominated
in foreign currencies. These derivative instruments are not
designated as hedges under SFAS 133, “Accounting Standards for Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities” (SFAS 133) and, as a result, changes in fair
value are reported currently as Other Expense, Net in the Consolidated
Statements of Income consistent with the transaction gain or loss on the
related
foreign denominated receivable or payable and non-hedged foreign currency
gains
and losses. Such net transaction gain was $19,000 for the year ended
October 31, 2007, compared to net transaction losses of $423,000 and $476,000
for the years ended October 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
Inventories. Inventories
are stated at the lower of cost or market, with cost determined using the
first-in, first-out method.
Property
and
Equipment. Property and equipment are carried at cost. Any
impairment would be recognized based on an assessment of future operations
(including cash flows) to ensure that assets are appropriately valued.
Depreciation and amortization of assets are provided primarily under the
straight-line method over the shorter of the estimated useful lives or the
lease
terms as follows:
Number
of Years
|
||
Building
|
40
|
|
Machines
|
7-10
|
|
Shop
and office equipment
|
3-7
|
|
Leasehold
improvements
|
3-40
|
Total
depreciation expense for the years ended October 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005
was
$1.4 million, $1.1 million, and $1.0 million, respectively.
Revenue
Recognition. We recognize revenue from sales of our machine
tool systems upon delivery of the product to the customer, which is normally
at
the time of shipment, because persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists,
delivery has occurred, the selling price is fixed and determinable and
collectibility is reasonably assured. In certain foreign locations,
we retain title after shipment under a “retention of title” clause solely to
protect collectibility. The retention of title is similar to UCC filings
in the
United States and provides the creditor with additional rights to the machine
if
the customer fails to pay. Revenue recognition at the time of
shipment is appropriate in this instance as long as all risks of ownership
have
passed to the buyer. Our computerized machine tools are general-purpose computer
controlled machine tools that are typically used in stand-alone operations.
Transfer of ownership and risk of loss are not contingent upon contractual
customer acceptance. Prior to shipment, we test each machine to ensure the
machine’s compliance with standard operating specifications as listed in our
sales literature.
Depending
upon geographic location, after shipment a machine may be installed at the
customer’s facilities by a distributor, independent contractor or Hurco service
technician. In most instances where a machine is sold through a
distributor, Hurco has no installation involvement. If sales are
direct or through sales agents, Hurco will typically complete the machine
installation, which consists of the reassembly of certain parts that were
removed for shipping and the re-testing of the machine to ensure that it
is
performing within the standard specifications. We consider the
machine installation process inconsequential and perfunctory.
Service
fees from maintenance contracts are deferred and recognized in earnings on
a pro
rata basis over the term of the contract. Sales related to software
products are recognized when shipped in conformity with American Institute
of
Certified Public Accountants’ Statement of Position 97-2.
35
HURCO
COMPANIES,
INC.
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS – Continued
Software
Revenue
Recognition. The software does not require production,
modification or customization. At the time of shipment, persuasive evidence
of
an arrangement exists, delivery has occurred, the selling price is fixed
and
determinable and collectibility is reasonably assured.
Product
Warranty. Expected future product warranty expense is recorded
when the product is sold. See Note 11 of Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements on further discussion of warranties.
Research
and Development
Costs. The costs associated with research and development
programs for new products and significant product improvements are expensed
as
incurred and are included in Selling, General and Administrative
Expenses. Research and development expenses totaled $3.1 million,
$2.5 million, and $2.4 million, in fiscal 2007, 2006, and 2005,
respectively.
Costs
incurred to develop computer software products and significant enhancements
to
software features of existing products to be sold or otherwise marketed are
capitalized, after technological feasibility is established. Software
development costs are amortized to Cost of Sales on a straight-line basis
over
the estimated product life of the related software, which ranges from three
to
five years. We capitalized costs of $1.2 million in 2007, $2.1
million in 2006, and $1.2 million in 2005 related to software development
projects. Amortization expense was $702,000, $363,000, and $329,000,
for the years ended October 31, 2007, 2006, and 2005,
respectively. Accumulated amortization at October 31, 2007 and 2006
was $3.7 million and $3.0 million, respectively. Any impairment of
the carrying value of the capitalized software development costs would be
recognized based on an assessment of future operations (including cash flows)
to
ensure that assets are appropriately valued.
Estimated
amortization expense for the existing amortizable intangible assets for the
years ending October 31, is as follows:
Fiscal
Year
|
Amortization
Expense
|
|||
2008
|
$ | 1,175 | ||
2009
|
1,375 | |||
2010
|
1,275 | |||
2011
|
1,275 | |||
2012
|
825 |
Earnings
Per
Share. Basic and diluted earnings per common share are based
on the weighted average number of our shares of common stock
outstanding. Diluted earnings per common share give effect to
outstanding stock options using the treasury method. The impact of
stock options on weighted average shares for the years ended October 31,
2007,
2006 and 2005 was 58,000, 80,000, and 165,000 respectively.
Income
Taxes. We
record income taxes under SFAS 109 “Accounting for Income
Taxes.” SFAS 109 utilizes the liability method for computing deferred
income taxes.
36
HURCO
COMPANIES,
INC.
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS – Continued
In
the
ordinary course of global business, there are transactions and calculations
where the ultimate tax outcome is uncertain. The calculation of tax
liabilities involves dealing with uncertainties in the application of complex
tax laws. We recognize potential liabilities for anticipated tax
audit issues in the U.S. and other tax jurisdictions based on an estimate
of the
ultimate resolution of whether, and the extent to which, additional taxes
will
be due. We have not provided any U.S. income taxes on the
undistributed earnings of our foreign subsidiaries or equity method investments
based upon our determination that such earnings will be indefinitely
reinvested. Although we believe the estimates are reasonable, no
assurance can be given that the final outcome of these matters will not be
different than what is reflected in the historical income tax provisions
and
accruals. Such differences could have a material impact on the income
tax provision and operating results in the period in which such determination
is
made.
As
part
of our financial process, we must assess the likelihood that our deferred
tax
assets can be recovered. If recovery is not likely, the provision for
taxes must be increased by recording a reserve in the form of a valuation
allowance for the deferred tax assets that are estimated not to be ultimately
recoverable. In the process, certain relevant criteria are evaluated
including the existence of deferred tax liabilities that can be used to absorb
deferred tax assets, the taxable income in prior carryback years that can
be
used to absorb net operating losses and credit carrybacks, and taxable income
in
future years. Our judgment regarding future profitability may change
due to future market conditions, changes in U.S. or international tax laws
and
other factors. These changes, if any, may require material
adjustments to these deferred tax assets and an accompanying reduction or
increase in net income in the period when such determinations are
made.
In
addition to the risks to the effective tax rate described above, the effective
tax rate reflected in forward-looking statements is based on current enacted
tax
law. Significant changes during the year of enacted tax law could
materially affect these estimates.
Estimates. The
preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. Generally Accepted
Accounting Principles requires us to make estimates and assumptions that
affect
the reported amounts presented and disclosed in our consolidated financial
statements. Significant estimates and assumptions in these consolidated
financial statements require the exercise of judgment and are used for, but
not
limited to, allowance for doubtful accounts, estimates of future cash flows
and
other assumptions associated with intangible and long-lived asset impairment
tests, useful lives for depreciation and amortization, warranty programs,
income
taxes and deferred tax valuation allowances, lease classification, and
contingencies. Due to the inherent uncertainty involved in making
estimates, actual results reported in future periods may be different from
these
estimates.
Stock
Based Compensation -
Prior to fiscal 2006, we applied the provisions of Accounting Principles
Board
(APB) Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees,” in accounting
for stock-based compensation. As a result, no compensation expense
was recognized for stock options granted with exercise prices equivalent
to the
fair market value of the stock on the date of grant. In fiscal 2006
we adopted SFAS No. 123(R), “Share Based Payment,” using the modified
prospective method. We began applying the provisions of SFAS No.
123(R) to option grants, as well as to the nonvested portion of outstanding
options granted before that date. Compensation expense is determined
at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes valuation model. We
recorded $480,000 and $17,000 of compensation expense during the fiscal years
ending October 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively for vested options. We
expect to record additional compensation expense of approximately $57,000
per
quarter, ratably, through the fourth quarter of fiscal 2009 for the options
granted in November 2006.
37
HURCO
COMPANIES,
INC.
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS – Continued
The
adoption of this pronouncement had no effect on compensation cost recorded
in
fiscal 2005 related to stock options, which will continue to be disclosed
on a
pro forma basis only.
(in
thousands, except per share data)
|
2005
|
|||
Net
income, as
reported
|
$ | 16,443 | ||
Deduct:
Total stock-based employee compensation expense determined under
fair
value based method for all awards, net of related tax
effects
|
(23 | ) | ||
Pro
forma net income
|
$ | 16,420 | ||
Earnings
(loss) per
share:
|
||||
Basic
as reported
|
$ | 2.66 | ||
Basic
pro forma
|
$ | 2.66 | ||
Diluted
as reported
|
$ | 2.60 | ||
Diluted
pro forma
|
$ | 2.59 |
As
of
October 31, 2007, there were no outstanding non-qualified options that had
been
granted outside of the 1997 plan to current members of the Board of
Directors.
Reclassifications
Certain
prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current year
presentation. These changes had no impact on previously reported net income
or
shareholders' equity.
2.
|
BUSINESS
OPERATIONS
|
Nature
of
Business. We design and manufacture computer control systems,
software and computerized machine tools for sale through our own distribution
system to the worldwide machine tool industry.
The
end
market for our products consists primarily of precision tool, die and mold
manufacturers, independent job shops, and specialized short-run production
applications within large manufacturing operations. Industries served
include: aerospace, defense, medical equipment, energy,
automotive/transportation, electronics and computer industries. Our
products are sold through independent agents and distributors in countries
throughout North America, Europe and Asia. We also maintain direct
sales operations in Canada, England, France, Germany, Italy, Singapore and
China.
Credit
Risk. We
sell products to customers located throughout the world. We perform
ongoing credit evaluations of customers and generally do not require
collateral. Allowances are maintained for potential credit
losses. Concentration of credit risk with respect to trade accounts
receivable is limited due to the large number of customers and their dispersion
across many geographic areas. Although a significant amount of trade
receivables are with distributors primarily located in the United States,
no
single distributor or region represents a significant concentration of credit
risk.
Manufacturing
Risk. Our
wholly owned subsidiary in Taiwan, Hurco Manufacturing Ltd. (HML), produces
over
98% of our machine tools. Any interruption in manufacturing at HML
would have an adverse effect on our financial operating
results. Interruption in manufacturing at HML could result from a
change in the political environment or a natural disaster, such as an
earthquake, typhoon, or tsunami. Any interruption with our contract manufacturer
or one of our key component suppliers may also have an adverse effect on
our
operating results and our financial condition.
38
HURCO
COMPANIES,
INC.
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS – Continued
3.
|
INVENTORIES
|
Inventories
as of October 31, 2007 and 2006 are summarized below (in
thousands):
2007
|
2006
|
|||||||
Purchased
parts and sub assemblies
|
$ | 10,956 | $ | 7,645 | ||||
Work-in-process
|
11,692 | 7,608 | ||||||
Finished
goods
|
38,473 | 28,090 | ||||||
$ | 61,121 | $ | 43,343 |
4.
|
DEBT
AGREEMENTS
|
As
of
October 31, 2007 we had no debt or borrowings outstanding under our domestic
and
European bank credit facilities. The $4.0 million mortgage balance
outstanding as of October 31, 2006 was paid in full on April 30, 2007. As
of
October 31, 2007 and 2006, we had $1,081,000 and $262,000, respectively,
of
outstanding letters of credit issued to non-U.S. suppliers for inventory
purchase commitments. As of October 31, 2007, we had unutilized
credit facilities of $11.2 million available for either direct borrowings
or
commercial letters of credit.
Domestic
Bank Credit
Facility. We had no borrowings outstanding under our domestic
bank credit facility at October 31, 2007 and 2006. Interest on the
domestic bank credit facility was at rates ranging from 6.75% to 7.5% at
October
31, 2007 and from 6.0% to 7.5% at October 31, 2006.
Effective
October 26, 2004, we amended our $8.0 million domestic bank credit agreement
to
extend the maturity date to January 31, 2008, and convert it to an unsecured
facility except for a continuation of the pledge of stock of two
subsidiaries. Borrowings may be made in U.S. Dollars, Euros or Pounds
Sterling. Interest on all outstanding borrowings is payable at LIBOR
for the respective currency plus an applicable margin, or, at our option,
the
bank’s prime rate plus a specified margin based on the ratio of our Total Funded
Debt to EBITDA (Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization)
ratio, as follows:
Ratio
of Total Funded Debt/EBITDA ratio
|
LIBOR
Margin
|
Prime
Margin
|
||
Greater
than 3.0
|
2.75%
|
0.0%
|
||
Greater
than 2.5 and less than or equal to 3.0
|
2.0%
|
(.25%)
|
||
Greater
than 2.0 and less than or equal to 2.5
|
1.5%
|
(.50%)
|
||
Less
than or equal to 2.0
|
1.0%
|
(.75%)
|
The
ratio
of our Total Funded Debt to EBITDA at October 31, 2007 was 0.0, as we had
no
debt outstanding. The applicable margin is adjusted on the first day
of the month following the month after each quarter end. The
availability under the facility is not limited by a borrowing base, unless
the
ratio exceeds 3.0.
The
agreement requires that Maximum Consolidated Total Indebtedness to Consolidated
Total Capitalization, as defined in the agreement, not exceed 0.275 to 1.0
and
our fixed charge coverage ratio not be less than 1.25 to 1.0. The
agreement also requires that we have positive net income for the four previous
quarters.
European
Bank Credit Facility.
The terms and conditions of the October 2004 domestic bank credit
facility amendment also apply to the revolving credit and overdraft facility
for
our U.K. subsidiary.
39
HURCO
COMPANIES,
INC.
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS – Continued
On
January 11, 2006, we renewed this credit facility with a European bank for
€1.5
million. The termination date is unspecified. Interest on
the facility is payable at a floating rate, 7.75% at October 31,
2007. Although the facility is uncollateralized, the bank reserves
the right to require collateral in the event of increased risk
evaluation. We had no borrowings outstanding under this facility at
October 31, 2007 and 2006.
On
December 7, 2007, we entered into a new domestic credit agreement that provides
us with a $30.0 million unsecured revolving credit facility and a separate
letter of credit facility in the amount of 100.0 million New Taiwan
Dollars. On the same day, we entered into a Taiwan revolving credit
agreement of 100.0 million New Taiwan Dollars which is an uncommitted demand
credit facility. In the event the Taiwan facility is not available, the Taiwan
letter of credit facility from the domestic agreement would enable us to
provide
credit enhancement to a replacement lender in Taiwan. We also entered into
a
£1.0 million revolving credit facility in the United Kingdom.
The
new
domestic and U.K. facilities, which mature on December 7, 2012, replace our
prior agreements, which would have matured on January 31, 2008. We
incurred no early termination or prepayment penalties in connection with
replacement of these prior facilities.
Borrowings
under the new domestic facility may be used for general corporate purposes
and
will bear interest at a LIBOR-based rate or an alternate base rate, in each
case, plus an applicable margin determined by reference to the ratio of the
interest-bearing debt and obligations and the undrawn face amount of all
letters
of credit outstanding, on a consolidated basis, to consolidated EBITDA.
Based on the most recent determination of that ratio, the applicable margin
under the new domestic facility will be less than it would have been under
the
prior facility. The new domestic facility contains customary affirmative
and
negative covenants and events of default for an unsecured commercial bank
credit
facility, including, among other things, limitations on consolidations, mergers
and sales of assets. The financial covenants contained in this agreement
are a
minimum quarterly consolidated net income covenant and a covenant establishing
a
maximum ratio of consolidated total indebtedness to total indebtedness and
net
worth. Other covenants contained in the agreement are not materially different
from those contained in the prior facility, except that it no longer includes
covenants relating to collateral and minimum collateral valuations, as the new
domestic facility is unsecured. The fixed charge coverage ratio, minimum
consolidated net worth financial covenants, and the borrowing base restrictions
that were part of the prior facility are not included in the new domestic
agreement and are no longer applicable.
5.
|
FINANCIAL
INSTRUMENTS
|
The
carrying amounts for trade receivables and payables approximate their fair
values. Long-term debt, including the current portion, is estimated
based on quoted market prices for similar issues or on current rates offered
to
us for debt with the similar terms and maturities and is stated at fair
value.
We
also
have financial instruments in the form of foreign currency forward exchange
contracts as described in Note 1 of Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements. The U.S. Dollar equivalent notional amount of these
contracts was $133.1 million and $112.7 million at October 31, 2007 and 2006,
respectively. The net fair value of derivative assets recorded in
Other Current Assets at October 31, 2007 and 2006 was $485,000 and $49,000,
respectively. The net fair value of derivative liabilities recorded
in Accrued Expenses at October 31, 2007 and 2006 was $3.7 million and $810,000,
respectively. Current market prices were used to estimate the fair
value of the foreign currency forward exchange contracts.
40
HURCO
COMPANIES,
INC.
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS - Continued
The
future value of the foreign currency forward exchange contracts and the related
currency positions are subject to offsetting market risk resulting from foreign
currency exchange rate volatility. The counterparties to these
contracts are substantial and creditworthy financial institutions. We
do not consider either the risk of counterparty non-performance or the economic
consequences of counterparty non-performance as material risks.
6.
|
INCOME
TAXES
|
Deferred
tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the difference between
the
amounts used for financial reporting purposes and tax basis of assets and
liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which the
differences are expected to reverse. Significant components of our
deferred tax assets and liabilities at October 31, 2007 and 2006 were as
follows
(in thousands):
October
31
|
||||||||
2007
|
2006
|
|||||||
Tax
effects of future tax deductible items related to:
|
||||||||
Current:
|
||||||||
Inter-company
profit in inventory
|
$ | 5,176 | $ | 3,307 | ||||
Derivative
liabilities
|
1,820 | 189 | ||||||
Accrued
inventory reserves
|
991 | 968 | ||||||
Accrued
warranty expenses
|
158 | 136 | ||||||
Deferred
compensation
|
214 | 185 | ||||||
Other
accrued expenses
|
280 | 547 | ||||||
Total
current deferred tax assets
|
8,639 | 5,332 | ||||||
Non-current:
|
||||||||
Other
|
224 | -- | ||||||
Goodwill
|
-- | 54 | ||||||
Total
deferred tax assets
|
8,863 | 5,386 | ||||||
Tax
effects of future taxable differences related to:
|
||||||||
Current:
|
||||||||
Derivative
assets
|
(369 | ) | -- | |||||
Other
|
(12 | ) | -- | |||||
Total
current deferred tax liabilities
|
(381 | ) | -- | |||||
Non-current:
|
||||||||
Accelerated
tax deduction and other tax over book deductions related to property,
equipment and software
|
(2,730 | ) | (2,552 | ) | ||||
Total
deferred tax liabilities
|
(3,111 | ) | (2,552 | ) | ||||
Net
tax effects of temporary differences
|
5,752 | 2,834 | ||||||
Tax
effects of carryforward benefits:
|
||||||||
U.S.
federal and state net operating loss carryforwards,
|
-- | 34 | ||||||
Foreign
net operating loss carryforwards, with no expiration
|
600 | 1,033 | ||||||
U.S.
federal and state general business tax credits
|
-- | 100 | ||||||
Tax
effects of carryforwards
|
600 | 1,167 | ||||||
Tax
effects of temporary differences and carryforwards, net
|
6,352 | 4,001 | ||||||
Less
valuation allowance
|
50 | 112 | ||||||
Net
deferred tax asset
|
$ | 6,302 | $ | 3,889 |
41
HURCO
COMPANIES,
INC.
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS - Continued
Except
as
indicated above, our carryforwards and tax credits expire at specific future
dates and utilization of certain carryforwards and tax credits are limited
to
specific amounts each year. Realization is entirely dependent upon
generating sufficient future earnings in specific tax jurisdictions prior
to the
expiration of the loss carryforwards and tax credits. Net operating
losses utilized were approximately $1.8 million in 2007 and approximately
$3.2
million in 2006.
We
operate in a highly cyclical industry and incurred significant operating
losses
in fiscal 2001 and 2002 for which a valuation allowance was
maintained. During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2005, after examining
a number of factors, including historical results and near term earning
projections, this valuation allowance was reduced to $221,000. The
valuation allowance on our remaining deferred tax assets at the end of fiscal
2007 is $50,000.
In
the
fiscal year ended October 31, income (loss) before income taxes and the
provision (benefit) for income taxes consisted of the following:
Income
(loss) before income taxes (in thousands):
|
Year
Ended October 31
|
|||||||||||
2007
|
2006
|
2005
|
||||||||||
Domestic
|
$ | 20,463 | $ | 13,688 | $ | 9,834 | ||||||
Foreign
|
12,302 | 9,426 | 6,248 | |||||||||
$ | 32,765 | $ | 23,114 | $ | 16,082 | |||||||
The
provision for income taxes consists of:
|
||||||||||||
Current:
|
||||||||||||
Federal
|
$ | 8,304 | $ | 4,306 | $ | 3,457 | ||||||
State
|
986 | 1,053 | 279 | |||||||||
Foreign
|
3,802 | 2,767 | 2,259 | |||||||||
13,092 | 8,126 | 5,995 | ||||||||||
Deferred:
|
||||||||||||
Federal
|
(1,657 | ) | (787 | ) | (4,685 | ) | ||||||
State
|
-- | -- | (553 | ) | ||||||||
Foreign
|
441 | 296 | (1,118 | ) | ||||||||
(1,216 | ) | (491 | ) | (6,356 | ) | |||||||
$ | 11,876 | $ | 7,635 | $ | (361 | ) | ||||||
Differences
between the effective tax rate and U.S. federal income tax rate
were (in
thousands):
|
||||||||||||
Tax
at U.S. statutory rate
|
$ | 11,468 | $ | 7,858 | $ | 5,468 | ||||||
Effect
of tax rates of international jurisdictions In excess (less than)
of U.S.
statutory rates
|
38 | (37 | ) | 81 | ||||||||
State
income taxes
|
798 | 883 | 279 | |||||||||
Deferred
tax asset valuation adjustment
|
62 | 109 | (2,342 | ) | ||||||||
Utilization
of net operating loss carryforwards
|
-- | -- | (3,740 | ) | ||||||||
Permanent
items
|
259 | (632 | ) | (155 | ) | |||||||
Others
|
(749 | ) | (546 | ) | 48 | |||||||
Provision
for (benefit from) income taxes
|
$ | 11,876 | $ | 7,635 | $ | (361 | ) |
We
have
not provided any U.S. income taxes on the undistributed earnings of our foreign
subsidiaries or equity method investments based upon our determination that
such
earnings will be indefinitely reinvested. Estimated undistributed earnings
of
foreign investments and subsidiaries at October 31, 2007 are approximately
$27.8
million. In the event these earnings are later distributed to the U.S., such
distributions could result in additional U.S. tax that may be offset, at
least
in part by associated foreign tax credits.
42
HURCO
COMPANIES,
INC.
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS - Continued
7.
|
EMPLOYEE
BENEFITS
|
We
have
defined contribution plans that include a majority of our employees, under
which
our contributions are discretionary. The purpose of these plans is
generally to provide additional financial security during retirement by
providing employees with an incentive to save throughout their
employment. Our contributions to the plans are based on employee
contributions or compensation. Our contributions totaled $460,200,
$382,300, and $243,800, for the years ended October 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005,
respectively.
We
also
have life insurance agreements with our executive officers. In fiscal 2005,
we
purchased the insurance policies from the executive officers. The
insurance premiums we paid will be repaid from the cash surrender value of
the
policies when the policies are terminated or exercised.
8.
|
STOCK
OPTIONS
|
In
March
2007, the 1997 Stock Option and Incentive Plan, which allowed us to grant
awards
of options to purchase shares of our common stock, stock appreciation rights,
restricted shares and performance shares, expired and we may no longer make
awards under this plan. Options granted under the plan prior to March
2007 remain exercisable for a period up to ten years after the date of grant
and
vest in equal annual installments as specified by the Compensation Committee
of
our Board of Directors at the time of grant. The exercise price of
options intended to qualify as incentive stock options may not be less than
100%
of the fair market value of a share of common stock on the date of
grant. During fiscal 2007, options to purchase 45,700 shares were
exercised resulting in cash proceeds of approximately
$186,700. During fiscal 2006, options to purchase 126,300 shares were
exercised resulting in cash proceeds of approximately $562,500. The
tax benefit from the exercise of stock options was approximately $298,000
and
$744,000 for fiscal 2007 and 2006, respectively.
Effective
November 1, 2005, we adopted SFAS No. 123(R), “Share Based Payment,” using the
modified prospective method, and began applying its provisions to all options
granted as well as to the nonvested portion of previously granted options
outstanding at that date. Compensation expense is determined at the
date of grant using the Black-Scholes valuation model.
On
November 16, 2006, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors granted
options with respect to 40,000 shares under the 1997 Plan to certain employees
and directors. The fair value of options awarded was estimated on the
date of grant using a Black-Scholes valuation model with assumptions for
expected volatility based on the historical volatility of the Company’s stock of
110%, contractual term of the options of ten years and a risk-free interest
rate
based upon a three-year U.S. Treasury yield as of the date of grant of
4.7%. The options granted to employees vest in three equal annual
installments and the directors’ options were granted with immediate vesting as
of the date of grant.
The
weighted-average fair value of options granted during fiscal 2007 was $22.84
and
$24.97 for employees and directors, respectively. We recorded
$480,000 and $17,000 of stock-based compensation expense during the fiscal
year
ending October 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively for options granted under
the
1997 Plan. We expect to record additional compensation expense of
approximately $57,000 per quarter, ratably, over the next two
years. Prior to fiscal 2007, no stock options had been granted since
fiscal 2002.
43
HURCO
COMPANIES,
INC.
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS - Continued
A
summary
of the status of the options as of October 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005 and the
related activity for the year is as follows:
Shares
Under Option*
|
Weighted
Average Exercise Price Per Share
|
|||||||
Balance
October 31, 2004
|
403,053 | $ | 3.71 | |||||
Granted
|
|
-- | -- | |||||
Cancelled
|
|
-- | -- | |||||
Expired
|
(2,000 | ) | 2.15 | |||||
Exercised
|
(185,653 | ) | 3.82 | |||||
Balance
October 31, 2005
|
215,400 | $ | 3.63 | |||||
Granted
|
-- | -- | ||||||
Cancelled
|
-- | -- | ||||||
Expired
|
(400 | ) | 2.15 | |||||
Exercised
|
(126,300 | ) | 4.45 | |||||
Balance
October 31, 2006
|
88,700 | $ | 2.46 | |||||
Granted
|
40,000 | 26.69 | ||||||
Cancelled
|
-- | -- | ||||||
Expired
|
-- | -- | ||||||
Exercised
|
(45,700 | ) | 4.08 | |||||
Balance
October 31, 2007
|
83,000 | $ | 13.24 |
*
Does
not include non-qualified
options granted to the Board of Directors outside of the 1990 Stock Option
Plan
and 1997 Stock Option and Incentive Plan which expired or were exercised
as of
December 2004.
The
total
intrinsic value of stock options exercised during the twelve months ended
October 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005 was approximately $2.4 million, $2.7 million
and
$2.6 million respectively.
As
of
October 31, 2007, the total intrinsic value of outstanding stock options
already
vested and expected to vest was $3.6 million. The intrinsic value of options
that are outstanding and exercisable as of October 31, 2007 was $3.0
million. Stock options outstanding and exercisable on October 31,
2007, are as follows:
Range
of Exercise Prices Per Share
|
Shares
Under Option
|
Weighted
Average Exercise Price Per Share
|
Weighted
Average Remaining Contractual Life in Years
|
|||||||||||
Outstanding
|
||||||||||||||
$ | 2.125 – 5.125 | 45,500 | $ | 2.15 | 2.3 | |||||||||
5.813 – 8.250 | -- | -- | -- | |||||||||||
26.690 | 37,500 | $ | 26.69 | 4.1 | ||||||||||
$ | 2.125 – 26.690 | 83,000 | $ | 13.24 | 4.1 | |||||||||
Exercisable
|
||||||||||||||
$ | 2.125 – 5.125 | 45,500 | $ | 2.15 | -- | |||||||||
5.813 – 8.250 | -- | -- | -- | |||||||||||
26.690 | 17,500 | $ | 26.69 | -- | ||||||||||
$ | 2.125 – 26.690 | 63,000 | $ | 8.97 | -- |
44
HURCO
COMPANIES,
INC.
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS - Continued
On
November 15, 2007, the Board of Directors of the Company adopted the 2008
Equity
Incentive Plan and directed that it be submitted to the shareholders for
consideration at the 2008 annual meeting of shareholders.
9. RELATED
PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Prior
to
August 16, 2007, we owned approximately 24% of one of our Taiwanese-based
contract manufacturers, Quaser Machine Tools, Inc. This investment
was accounted for using the equity method and was included in Investments
and
Other Assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. On August 16, 2007,
we entered into a contract for the sale of our shares for $2.1 million, which
was approximately our carrying value. The sale closed during the
fourth quarter of 2007. We did not recognize any material gain or
loss as a result of this transaction. As a result of this sale, we
recognized a liability of $740,000 related to the tax gain on the sale of
the
investment. Purchases of product from this contract manufacturer
totaled $3.4 million, $2.0 million and $2.7 million for the years ended October
31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively. Sales of product to this
contract manufacturer were $176,000, $70,000 and $117,000 in fiscal 2007,
2006
and 2005 respectively. Trade payables to this contract manufacturer
were $857,000 at October 31, 2007, and $256,000 at October 31,
2006. Trade receivables were $37,000 at October 31, 2007, and $32,000
at October 31, 2006.
As
of
October 31, 2007, we owned 35% of Hurco Automation, Ltd. (HAL), a Taiwan
based
company. HAL’s scope of activities includes the design, manufacture,
sales and distribution of industrial automation products, software systems
and
related components, including control systems and components produced under
contract for sale exclusively to us. We are accounting for this
investment using the equity method. The investment of $2.4 million
and $2.0 million at October 31, 2007 and 2006 is included in Investments
and
Other Assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Purchases of product
from this supplier amounted to $11.7 million, $10.5 million and $7.7 million
in
2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively. Sales of product to this supplier
were $1.9 million, $2.0 million and $1.8 million for the years ended October
31,
2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively. Trade payables to HAL were $2.4
million and $1.9 million at October 31, 2007 and 2006,
respectively. Trade receivables from HAL were $426,000 and $235,000
at October 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
Summary
financial information for these two related parties is as follows:
(in
thousands)
|
2007
(1)
|
2006
|
2005
|
|||||||||
Net
Sales
|
$ | 58,053 | $ | 58,286 | $ | 50,896 | ||||||
Gross
Profit
|
10,061 | 10,932 | 8,947 | |||||||||
Operating
Income
|
3,757 | 4,209 | 2,676 | |||||||||
Net
Income
|
3,467 | 3,727 | 2,313 | |||||||||
Current
Assets
|
$ | 36,945 | $ | 27,903 | $ | 21,553 | ||||||
Non-current
Assets
|
10,636 | 7,684 | 1,824 | |||||||||
Current
Liabilities
|
18,785 | 20,156 | 14,857 |
(1)
Financial
information for Quaser Machine Tools for fiscal 2007 includes financial
information through the date of sale.
45
HURCO
COMPANIES,
INC.
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS – Continued
10.
|
CONTINGENCIES
AND
LITIGATION
|
We
are
involved in various claims and lawsuits arising in the normal course of
business. We do not expect any of these claims, individually or in
the aggregate, to have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial
position or results of operations.
11.
|
GUARANTEES
|
During
fiscal 2003, we adopted Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB)
Interpretation No. 45 (“FIN 45”), “Guarantor’s Accounting and Disclosure
Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness
of
Others, an interpretation of FASB Statements No. 5, 57 and 107 and Rescission
of
FASB Interpretation No. 34.” FIN 45 clarifies the requirements of
FASB Statement No. 5, Accounting for Contingencies, relating to the guarantor’s
accounting for, and disclosures of, the issuance of certain types of
guarantees.
From
time
to time, our subsidiaries guarantee third party payment obligations in
connection with the sale of certain machines to customers that use
financing. At October 31, 2007, we had 54 outstanding third party
guarantees totaling approximately $1.6 million. The terms of our subsidiaries
guarantees are consistent with the underlying customer financing terms. Upon
shipment, the customer has the risk of ownership. The customer does not obtain
title until the machine is paid in full. A retention of title clause allows
us
to obtain the machine if the customer defaults on the lease. We
believe that the proceeds obtained from liquidation of the machine would
cover
any payments required by the guarantee.
We
provide warranties on our products with respect to defects in material and
workmanship. The terms of these warranties are generally one year for machines
and shorter periods for service parts. We recognize a reserve with
respect to this obligation at the time of product sale, with subsequent warranty
claims recorded against the reserve. The amount of the warranty reserve is
determined based on historical trend experience and any known warranty issues
that could cause future warranty costs to differ from historical
experience. A reconciliation of the changes in our warranty reserve
is as follows (in thousands):
10/31/07
|
10/31/06
|
|||||||
Balance,
beginning of period
|
$ | 1,926 | $ | 1,618 | ||||
Provision
for warranties during the period
|
2,459 | 2,139 | ||||||
Charges
to the accrual
|
(2,087 | ) | (1,893 | ) | ||||
Impact
of foreign currency translation
|
151 | 62 | ||||||
Balance,
end of period
|
$ | 2,449 | $ | 1,926 |
46
HURCO
COMPANIES,
INC.
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS – Continued
12.
|
OPERATING
LEASES
|
We
lease
facilities, certain equipment and vehicles under operating leases that expire
at
various dates through 2014. Future payments required under operating
leases as of October 31, 2007, are summarized as follows (in
thousands):
2008
|
$ | 1,710 | ||
2009
|
1,044 | |||
2010
|
639 | |||
2011
|
414 | |||
Thereafter
|
355 | |||
Total
|
$ | 4,162 |
Lease
expense for the years ended October 31, 2007, 2006, and 2005 was $2.3 million,
$1.9 million, and $1.8 million, respectively.
We
recorded approximately $180,000 of lease income during fiscal 2007 from
subletting 50,000 square feet of our Indianapolis facility. The
sublease expires on April 30, 2010.
47
HURCO
COMPANIES,
INC.
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS - Continued
13.
|
QUARTERLY
HIGHLIGHTS
(Unaudited)
|
First
Quarter
|
Second
Quarter
|
Third
Quarter
|
Fourth
Quarter
|
|||||||||||||
2007
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
||||||||||||||||
Sales
and service fees
|
$ | 46,878 | $ | 42,494 | $ | 48,555 | $ | 50,120 | ||||||||
Gross
profit
|
17,324 | 16,349 | 18,417 | 18,992 | ||||||||||||
Gross
profit margin
|
37.0 | % | 38.5 | % | 37.9 | % | 37.9 | % | ||||||||
Selling,
general and administrative expenses
|
9,250 | 9,405 | 10,228 | 11,241 | ||||||||||||
Operating
income
|
8,074 | 6,944 | 8,189 | 7,751 | ||||||||||||
Provision
(benefit) for income taxes
|
2,998 | 2,764 | 3,659 | 2,455 | ||||||||||||
Net
income
|
5,395 | 4,680 | 5,163 | 5,651 | ||||||||||||
Income
per common share – basic
|
$ | 0.85 | $ | 0.73 | $ | 0.81 | $ | 0.88 | ||||||||
Income
per common share – diluted
|
$ | 0.84 | $ | 0.73 | $ | 0.80 | $ | 0.88 | ||||||||
First
Quarter
|
Second
Quarter
|
Third
Quarter
|
Fourth
Quarter
|
|||||||||||||
2006
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
||||||||||||||||
Sales
and service fees
|
$ | 31,894 | $ | 36,861 | $ | 36,597 | $ | 43,164 | ||||||||
Gross
profit
|
10,927 | 13,179 | 12,835 | 16,384 | ||||||||||||
Gross
profit margin
|
34.3 | % | 35.8 | % | 35.1 | % | 38.0 | % | ||||||||
Selling,
general and administrative expenses
|
6,296 | 7,140 | 7,392 | 9,869 | ||||||||||||
Operating
income
|
4,631 | 6,039 | 5,443 | 6,515 | ||||||||||||
Provision
(benefit) for income taxes
|
1,618 | 2,250 | 1,646 | 2,120 | ||||||||||||
Net
Income
|
3,033 | 3,929 | 3,802 | 4,714 | ||||||||||||
Income
per common share – basic
|
$ | 0.49 | $ | 0.62 | $ | 0.60 | $ | 0.75 | ||||||||
Income
per common share – diluted
|
$ | 0.48 | $ | 0.62 | $ | 0.59 | $ | 0.74 |
48
HURCO
COMPANIES,
INC.
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS - Continued
14.
|
SEGMENT
INFORMATION
|
We
operate in a single segment: industrial automation equipment. We
design and produce interactive computer control systems and software and
computerized machine tools for sale through our own distribution network
to the
worldwide metal working market. We also provide software options,
control upgrades, accessories and replacement parts for our products, as
well as
customer service and training support.
We
sell
our products through more than 170 independent agents and distributors in
countries throughout North America, Europe and Asia. The Hurco line
is the primary line for the majority of our distributors globally even though
some may carry competitive products. We also have our own direct
sales personnel in Canada, England, France, Germany, Italy, Singapore and
China,
which are among the world's principal machine tool consuming
countries. During fiscal 2007, no distributor accounted for more than
5% of our sales and service fees. Approximately 89% of
the worldwide demand for computerized machine tools and computer control
systems
comes from outside the U.S. In fiscal 2007, more than two-thirds of
our revenues were from overseas customers and no single end-user of our products
accounted for more than 5% of our total sales and service fees.
The
following table sets forth the contribution of each of our product groups
to our
total sales and service fees during each of the past three fiscal years (in
thousands):
Net
Sales and Service Fees by
Product Category
|
Year
ended October
31,
|
|||||||||||
2007
|
2006
|
2005
|
||||||||||
Computerized
Machine Tools
|
$ | 165,832 | $ | 128,946 | $ | 107,313 | ||||||
Computer
Control Systems and Software *
|
5,291 | 4,694 | 4,129 | |||||||||
Service
Parts
|
12,096 | 10,494 | 9,991 | |||||||||
Service
Fees
|
4,828 | 4,383 | 4,076 | |||||||||
Total
|
$ | 188,047 | $ | 148,517 | $ | 125,509 |
*Amounts
shown do not include computer control systems and software sold as an integrated
component of computerized machine systems.
The
following table sets forth revenues by geographic area, based on customer
location, for each of the past three fiscal years were (in
thousands):
Revenues
by Geographic
Area
|
Year
Ended October
31
|
|||||||||||
2007
|
2006
|
2005
|
||||||||||
Americas
|
$ | 50,010 | $ | 48,711 | $ | 42,968 | ||||||
Germany
|
58,860 | 39,764 | 36,039 | |||||||||
United
Kingdom
|
19,326 | 16,089 | 11,917 | |||||||||
France
|
11,019 | 9,107 | 7,949 | |||||||||
Other
Europe
|
35,245 | 22,113 | 18,112 | |||||||||
Total
Europe
|
124,450 | 87,073 | 74,017 | |||||||||
Asia
|
12,493 | 11,866 | 7,161 | |||||||||
Other
Foreign
|
1,094 | 867 | 1,363 | |||||||||
Total
Foreign
|
138,037 | 99,806 | 82,541 | |||||||||
$ | 188,047 | $ | 148,517 | $ | 125,509 |
49
HURCO
COMPANIES,
INC.
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS - Continued
Long-lived
tangible assets by geographic area were (in thousands):
As
of October
31
|
||||||||||||
2007
|
2006
|
2005
|
||||||||||
United
States
|
$ | 7,795 | $ | 8,308 | $ | 8,034 | ||||||
Foreign
countries
|
5,489 | 2,934 | 3,117 | |||||||||
$ | 13,284 | $ | 11,242 | $ | 11,151 |
15.
|
NEW
ACCOUNTING
PRONOUNCEMENTS
|
In
July
2006, the FASB released Interpretation No. 48 “Accounting for Uncertainty in
Income Taxes,” an interpretation of FASB Statement No.109 which clarifies the
accounting and reporting for uncertainties in income taxes. The
interpretation prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute
for
the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken
or
expect to be taken in a tax return. FIN No. 48 also provides guidance
on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim
periods, disclosure and transition. We will be required to adopt and
report the impact of FIN No. 48 in the first quarter of fiscal year
2008. Although we will not adopt this Statement until first quarter
2008, we have assessed the potential impact and conclude that the adoption
will
not have a material effect on the consolidated financial
statements.
During
2006, the FASB released Statement No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements”, a new
standard which provides further guidance on using fair value to measure assets
and liabilities, the information used to measure fair value and the effect
of
fair value measurements on earnings. Statement 157 applies whenever
other standards require (or permit) assets or liabilities to be measured
at fair
value, but does not expand the use of fair value in any new
circumstances. We will be required to adopt and report the impact of
Statement 157 in the first quarter of fiscal year 2008. Although we
will not adopt this Statement until first quarter 2008, we have assessed
the
potential impact and conclude that the adoption will not have a material
effect
on the consolidated financial statements.
In
February 2007, the FASB released Statement No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for
Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities”, a new standard that permits an
entity to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other
items
at fair value. The objective of this statement is to improve
financial reporting by providing entities with the opportunity to mitigate
volatility in reported earnings caused by measuring related assets and
liabilities differently without having to apply complex hedge accounting
provisions. Statement No. 159 is effective in the first quarter of
fiscal 2008. Although we will not adopt this Statement until first
quarter 2008, we have assessed the potential impact and conclude that the
adoption will not have a material effect on the consolidated financial
statements.
In
September 2006, the Securities and Exchange Commission staff issued Accounting
Bulletin No. 108, “Considering the Effects of Prior Year Misstatements when
Quantifying Misstatements in Current Year Financial Statements” (SAB
108). SAB 108 was issued in order to eliminate the diversity in
practice surrounding how public companies quantify financial statement
misstatements. SAB 108 requires that registrants quantify errors
using both a balance sheet and income statement approach and evaluate whether
either approach results in a misstated amount that, when all relevant
quantitative and qualitative factors are considered, is material. We
adopted the provisions of this Bulletin during fiscal 2007 and the adoption
did
not have a material effect on the consolidated financial
statements.
50
Item
9.
|
CHANGES
IN AND
DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL
DISCLOSURES
|
None.
Item
9A.
|
CONTROLS
AND
PROCEDURES
|
We
carried out an evaluation under the supervision and with participation of
management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer,
of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls
and
procedures as of October 31, 2007 pursuant to Rule 13a-15(b) under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Based upon that
evaluation, our management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer, concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures
were
effective as of the evaluation date.
There
have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that
occurred during the fourth quarter of the fiscal year ended October 31, 2007
that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect,
our internal control over financial reporting.
51
Item
9B.
|
OTHER
INFORMATION
|
During
the fourth quarter of fiscal 2007, the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors
did not engage our independent registered public accounting firm to perform
any
non-audit services. This disclosure is made pursuant to Section
10A(i)(2) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as added by Section 202
of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
The
following graph illustrates the cumulative total shareholder return on Hurco
common stock for the five-year period ended October 31, 2007, as compared
to the
Russell 2000 and a peer group consisting of traded securities for U.S. companies
in the same three digit SIC group as Hurco (SIC 3540-3549 – Metal Working
Machinery and Equipment). The comparisons in this table are required
by the SEC and are not intended to forecast or be indicative of possible
future
performance of Hurco common stock.
|
|
|
10/02
|
10/03
|
10/04
|
10/05
|
10/06
|
10/07
|
Hurco
Companies,
Inc.
|
100.00
|
165.81
|
924.52
|
1150.32
|
1681.29
|
3683.87
|
|
Russell
2000
|
100.00
|
143.37
|
160.18
|
179.53
|
215.40
|
235.37
|
|
Peer
Group
|
100.00
|
108.67
|
173.68
|
185.05
|
192.99
|
237.90
|
*The
stock price performance
included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price
performance
52
PART
III
Item
10.
|
DIRECTORS
AND
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE
REGISTRANT
|
The
information required by this item is hereby incorporated by reference to
the
definitive proxy statement for our 2008 annual meeting of shareholders except
that the information required by Item 10 regarding our executive officers
is
included herein under a separate caption at the end of Part I.
Item
11.
|
EXECUTIVE
COMPENSATION
|
The
information required by this item is hereby incorporated by reference to
the
definitive proxy statement for our 2008 annual meeting of
shareholders.
Item
12.
|
SECURITY
OWNERSHIP OF
CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER
MATTERS
|
Except
for the information concerning equity compensation plans, the information
required by this item is hereby incorporated by reference to the definitive
proxy statement for our 2008 annual meeting of shareholders.
Equity
Compensation Plan
Information
The
following table gives information about our common stock that may be issued
upon
the exercise of options, warrants and rights under all of our existing equity
compensation plans as of October 31, 2007:
Plan
Category
|
Number
of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options,
warrants
and rights (a) (#)
|
Weighted-average
exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights (b)
($)
|
Number
of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity
compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column (a))
(c)
(#)
|
|||||||||
Equity
compensation plans approved by security holders
|
83,000 | $ | 13.24 | -- | ||||||||
Equity
compensation plans not approved by security holders
|
-- | -- | -- | |||||||||
Total
|
83,000 | $ | 13.24 | -- |
As
of
October 31, 2007, there were no outstanding non-qualified options that had
been
granted outside of any plans approved by our shareholders.
Item
13.
|
CERTAIN
RELATIONSHIPS
AND RELATED
TRANSACTIONS
|
The
information required by this item is hereby incorporated by reference to
the
definitive proxy statement for our 2008 annual meeting of
shareholders.
53
Item
14.
|
PRINCIPAL
ACCOUNTANT
FEES AND SERVICES
|
The
information required by this item is hereby incorporated by reference to
the
definitive proxy statement for our 2008 annual meeting of
shareholders.
PART
IV
Item
15.
|
EXHIBITS
AND FINANCIAL
STATEMENT SCHEDULES
|
(a)
|
1.
|
Financial
Statements. The following consolidated financial
statements of Registrant are included herein under Item 8 of Part
II:
|
||
Page
|
||||
Report
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm – Crowe Chizek and
Company LLC
|
27
|
|||
Report
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm – PricewaterhouseCoopers
LLP
|
29
|
|||
Consolidated
Statements of Income – years ended October 31, 2007, 2006 and
2005
|
30
|
|||
Consolidated
Balance Sheets – as of October 31, 2007 and 2006
|
31
|
|||
Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows – years ended October 31, 2007, 2006 and
2005
|
32
|
|||
Consolidated
Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity – years ended October 31,
2007, 2006 and 2005
|
33
|
|||
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements
|
34
|
|||
2.
|
Financial
Statement Schedule. The following financial statement schedule
is included in this Item.
|
|||
Page
|
||||
Schedule
II - Valuation and Qualifying Accounts and Reserves
|
55
|
|||
All
other financial statement schedules are omitted because they are
not
applicable or the required information is included in the consolidated
financial statements or notes thereto.
|
||||
(b)
|
Exhibits
|
|||
Exhibits
being filed with this Form 10-K or incorporated herein by reference
are
listed on page 56.
|
|
54
Schedule
II - Valuation and
Qualifying Accounts and Reserves
for
the years ended October 31, 2007,
2006, and 2005
(Dollars
in thousands)
Description
|
Balance
at Beginning of Period
|
Charged
to Costs and Expenses
|
Charged
To Other Accounts
|
Deductions
|
Balance
At End Of Period
|
|||||||||||||||
Allowance
for doubtful Accounts for the year ended:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
October
31, 2007
|
$ | 635 | $ | 128 | -- | $ | 12 | (1) | $ | 751 | ||||||||||
October
31, 2006
|
$ | 842 | $ | (227 | ) | -- | $ | (20 | )(2) | $ | 635 | |||||||||
October
31, 2005
|
$ | 723 | $ | 169 | -- | $ | 50 | (3) | $ | 842 | ||||||||||
Accrued
warranty expenses For the year ended:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
October
31, 2007
|
$ | 1,926 | $ | 2,610 | -- | $ | 2,087 | $ | 2,449 | |||||||||||
October
31, 2006
|
$ | 1,618 | $ | 2,201 | -- | $ | 1,893 | $ | 1,926 | |||||||||||
October
31, 2005
|
$ | 1,750 | $ | 1,646 | -- | $ | 1,778 | $ | 1,618 |
(1)
|
Receivable
write-offs of $20,000, net of cash recoveries on accounts previously
written off of $8,000.
|
(2)
|
Receivable
write-offs of $5,000, net of cash recoveries on accounts previously
written off of $25,000.
|
(3)
|
Receivable
write-offs of $50,000, net of cash recoveries on accounts previously
written off of $0.
|
55
EXHIBITS
INDEX
Exhibits
Filed. The following exhibits are filed with this
report:
Summary
compensation table.
|
|
Statement
re: computation of per share earnings.
|
|
Subsidiaries
of the Registrant.
|
|
Consent
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm, Crowe Chizek
and Company
LLC.
|
|
Consent
of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP.
|
|
Certification
by the Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to Rule 13a-15(b) under
the
Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
|
|
Certification
by the Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to Rule 13a-15(b) under
the
Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
|
|
Certification
by the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
Certification
by the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
Exhibits
Incorporated by
Reference. The following exhibits are incorporated into this
report:
3.1
|
Amended
and Restated Articles of Incorporation of the Registrant, incorporated
by
reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Registrant's Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended July 31, 2000.
|
3.2
|
Amended
and Restated By-Laws of the Registrant as amended through September
27,
2006, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Registrant’s Current
Report on Form 8-K filed on September 27, 2006.
|
10.2
|
Credit
Agreement dated as of December 7, 2007, between Hurco Companies,
Inc. And
JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.1 to
Current Report on Form 8-K filed December 12, 2007.
|
10.3*
|
Employment
Agreement between the Registrant and John G. Oblazney dated January
12,
2007, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended October 31,
2006.
|
10.4*
|
Employment
Agreement between the Registrant and James D. Fabris dated November
18,
1997, incorporated by reference as Exhibit 10.15 to the Registrant's
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended January 31,
1998.
|
10.5*
|
Employment
Agreement between the Registrant and Michael Doar dated November
13, 2001,
incorporated by reference as Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant’s Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q dated January 31, 2002.
|
10.6*
|
Amended
1997 Stock Option and Incentive Plan incorporated by reference
as Exhibit
10 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed for the quarter
ended July 31, 2005.
|
*
|
The
indicated exhibit is a management contract, compensatory plan or
arrangement required to be listed by Item 601 of Regulation
S-K.
|
56
SIGNATURES
Pursuant
to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of
1934, the Registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf
by
the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, this 10th day of January
2008.
HURCO COMPANIES, INC. | |||
By:
|
/s/
John G. Oblazney
|
||
John G. Oblazney
|
|||
Vice-President,
Secretary,
|
|||
Treasurer
and
|
|||
Chief
Financial Officer
|
57
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has
been
signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in
the
capacities and on the dates indicated:
Signature
and Title(s)
|
Date
|
|
/s/
Michael Doar
|
January
10,
2008
|
|
Michael Doar,
Chairman of the Board, Chief
Executive Officer and Director of Hurco Companies,
Inc.
|
||
(Principal
Executive
Officer)
|
||
/s/
John G. Oblazney
|
January
10,
2008
|
|
John G. Oblazney
|
||
Vice-President,
|
||
Secretary,
Treasurer and Chief
Financial Officer of Hurco Companies, Inc.
|
||
(Principal
Financial
Officer)
|
||
/s/
Sonja K. McClelland
|
January
10,
2008
|
|
Sonja K. McClelland
|
||
Corporate
Controller, Assistant
Secretary of Hurco Companies, Inc.
|
||
(Principal
Accounting
Officer)
|
/s/
Stephen H. Cooper
|
January
10,
2008
|
|
Stephen H. Cooper,
Director
|
||
/s/
Robert W. Cruickshank
|
January
10,
2008
|
|
Robert W. Cruickshank,
Director
|
||
/s/
Philip James
|
January
10,
2008
|
|
Philip James,
Director
|
||
/s/
Michael P. Mazza
|
January
10,
2008
|
|
Michael
P. Mazza, Director
|
||
/s/
Richard T. Niner
|
January
10,
2008
|
|
Richard T. Niner,
Director
|
||
/s/
O. Curtis Noel
|
January
10,
2008
|
|
O.
Curtis Noel,
Director
|
||
/s/
Charlie Rentschler
|
January
10,
2008
|
|
Charlie Rentschler,
Director
|
58