HURCO COMPANIES INC - Quarter Report: 2010 July (Form 10-Q)
UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington,
D.C. 20549
FORM
10-Q
(Mark
One)
x
|
Quarterly
report pursuant to section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 for the quarterly period ended July 31, 2010
or
|
¨
|
Transition
report pursuant to section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 for the transition period from _________ to
_________.
|
Commission
File No. 0-9143
HURCO
COMPANIES, INC.
(Exact
name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Indiana
|
35-1150732
|
|
(State
or other jurisdiction of
|
(I.R.S.
Employer Identification Number)
|
|
incorporation
or organization)
|
||
One
Technology Way
|
||
Indianapolis, Indiana
|
46268
|
|
(Address
of principal executive offices)
|
(Zip
code)
|
Registrant’s
telephone number, including area
code (317)
293-5309
Indicate
by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be
filed by Sections 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the
preceding 12 months, and (2) has been subject to the filing requirements for the
past 90 days:
Yes x No
¨
Indicate
by check mark whether the Registrant has submitted electronically and posted on
its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be
submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this
chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
Registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes ¨ No
¨
Indicate
by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a small reporting
company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,”
“accelerated filer,” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large
accelerated filer ¨
|
Accelerated
filer x
|
Non-accelerated
filer ¨
(Do not check if a smaller
reporting company)
|
Smaller
reporting company ¨
|
Indicate
by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange
Act). Yes ¨ No
x
The
number of shares of the Registrant's common stock outstanding as of September 1,
2010 was 6,440,851.
HURCO
COMPANIES, INC.
July 2010
Form 10-Q Quarterly Report
Table
of Contents
Part
I - Financial Information
|
||
Item
1.
|
Financial
Statements
|
|
Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Operations
Three
and nine months ended July 31, 2010 and 2009
|
3
|
|
Condensed
Consolidated Balance Sheets
As
of July 31, 2010 and October 31, 2009
|
4
|
|
Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Three
and nine months ended July 31, 2010 and 2009
|
5
|
|
Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders' Equity
Nine
months ended July 31, 2010 and 2009
|
6
|
|
Notes
to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
|
7
|
|
Item
2.
|
Management's
Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition
and Results of Operations
|
16
|
Item
3.
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
|
23
|
Item
4.
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
25
|
Part
II - Other Information
|
||
Item
1.
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
26
|
Item
1A.
|
Risk
Factors
|
26
|
Item
5.
|
Other
Information
|
26
|
Item
6.
|
Exhibits
|
27
|
Signatures
|
28
|
2
PART
I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item
1.
|
FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
|
HURCO
COMPANIES, INC.
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In thousands, except per share
data)
Three
Months Ended
|
Nine
Months Ended
|
|||||||||||||||
July 31
|
July
31
|
|||||||||||||||
2010
|
2009
|
2010
|
2009
|
|||||||||||||
(Unaudited)
|
(Unaudited)
|
|||||||||||||||
Sales
and service fees
|
$ | 26,474 | $ | 19,039 | $ | 71,178 | $ | 67,835 | ||||||||
Cost
of sales and service
|
21,815 | 13,788 | 57,862 | 48,822 | ||||||||||||
Gross
profit
|
4,659 | 5,251 | 13,316 | 19,013 | ||||||||||||
Selling,
general and administrative expenses
|
6,994 | 7,200 | 20,757 | 22,747 | ||||||||||||
Operating
loss
|
(2,335 | ) | (1,949 | ) | (7,441 | ) | (3,734 | ) | ||||||||
Interest
expense
|
21 | 6 | 43 | 33 | ||||||||||||
Interest
income
|
24 | 36 | 49 | 185 | ||||||||||||
Investment
income
|
4 | 3 | 12 | 32 | ||||||||||||
Other
(income) expense, net
|
55 | (133 | ) | 448 | (1,828 | ) | ||||||||||
Loss
before taxes
|
(2,383 | ) | (1,783 | ) | (7,871 | ) | (1,722 | ) | ||||||||
Benefit
for income taxes
|
(1,210 | ) | (552 | ) | (3,289 | ) | (564 | ) | ||||||||
Net
loss
|
$ | (1,173 | ) | $ | (1,231 | ) | $ | (4,582 | ) | $ | (1,158 | ) | ||||
Losses
per common share
|
||||||||||||||||
Basic
|
$ | (0.18 | ) | $ | (0.19 | ) | $ | (0.71 | ) | $ | (0.18 | ) | ||||
Diluted
|
$ | (0.18 | ) | $ | (0.19 | ) | $ | (0.71 | ) | $ | (0.18 | ) | ||||
Weighted
average common shares outstanding
|
||||||||||||||||
Basic
|
6,441 | 6,434 | 6,441 | 6,425 | ||||||||||||
Diluted
|
6,441 | 6,434 | 6,441 | 6,425 |
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed consolidated financial
statements.
3
HURCO
COMPANIES, INC.
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In
thousands, except share and per-share data)
July 31
2010
|
October 31
2009 |
|||||||
(Unaudited)
|
(Audited)
|
|||||||
ASSETS
|
||||||||
Current
assets:
|
||||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
$ | 45,189 | $ | 28,782 | ||||
Accounts
receivable, net
|
14,276 | 13,988 | ||||||
Refundable
taxes
|
796 | 7,121 | ||||||
Inventories,
net
|
51,027 | 60,281 | ||||||
Deferred
income taxes, net
|
2,532 | 2,670 | ||||||
Derivative
assets
|
1,287 | 376 | ||||||
Other
|
8,221 | 5,046 | ||||||
Total
current assets
|
123,328 | 118,264 | ||||||
Non-current
assets:
|
||||||||
Property
and equipment:
|
||||||||
Land
|
782 | 782 | ||||||
Building
|
7,116 | 7,116 | ||||||
Machinery
and equipment
|
14,768 | 14,995 | ||||||
Leasehold
improvements
|
2,042 | 2,021 | ||||||
24,708 | 24,914 | |||||||
Less
accumulated depreciation and amortization
|
(12,800 | ) | (11,802 | ) | ||||
11,908 | 13,112 | |||||||
Software
development costs, less accumulated amortization
|
6,093 | 6,503 | ||||||
Investments
and other assets, net
|
6,284 | 6,864 | ||||||
$ | 147,613 | $ | 144,743 | |||||
LIABILITIES
AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
|
||||||||
Current
liabilities:
|
||||||||
Accounts
payable
|
$ | 20,561 | $ | 8,262 | ||||
Accrued
expenses and other
|
6,786 | 9,025 | ||||||
Accrued
warranty expenses
|
1,183 | 1,286 | ||||||
Derivative
liabilities
|
1,516 | 2,234 | ||||||
Total
current liabilities
|
30,046 | 20,807 | ||||||
Non-current
liabilities:
|
||||||||
Deferred
income taxes, net
|
2,592 | 2,570 | ||||||
Deferred
credits and other
|
929 | 990 | ||||||
Total
liabilities
|
33,567 | 24,367 | ||||||
Shareholders’
equity:
|
||||||||
Preferred
stock: no par value per share, 1,000,000 shares authorized,
no shares issued
|
— | — | ||||||
Common
stock: no par value, $.10 stated value per share, 13,250,000 shares
authorized, 6,440,851 shares issued and outstanding,
respectively
|
644 | 644 | ||||||
Additional
paid-in capital
|
52,098 | 52,003 | ||||||
Retained
earnings
|
64,986 | 69,568 | ||||||
Accumulated
other comprehensive loss
|
(3,682 | ) | (1,839 | ) | ||||
Total
shareholders’ equity
|
114,046 | 120,376 | ||||||
$ | 147,613 | $ | 144,743 |
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed consolidated financial
statements.
4
HURCO
COMPANIES, INC.
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In
thousands)
Three
Months Ended
|
Nine
Months Ended
|
|||||||||||||||
July 31
|
July 31
|
|||||||||||||||
2010
|
2009
|
2010
|
2009
|
|||||||||||||
(Unaudited)
|
(Unaudited)
|
|||||||||||||||
Cash
flows from operating activities:
|
||||||||||||||||
Net
income (loss)
|
$ | (1,173 | ) | $ | (1,231 | ) | $ | (4,582 | ) | $ | (1,158 | ) | ||||
Adjustments to
reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by (used for)
operating activities:
|
||||||||||||||||
Provision
for doubtful accounts
|
(74 | ) | 329 | (263 | ) | 845 | ||||||||||
Changes
in deferred income taxes
|
473 | 217 | (310 | ) | (1,029 | ) | ||||||||||
Equity
in (income) loss of affiliates
|
(27 | ) | 125 | 154 | 213 | |||||||||||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
978 | 846 | 2,811 | 2,451 | ||||||||||||
Foreign
currency (gain) loss
|
1,030 | (4,366 | ) | 4,614 | (5,227 | ) | ||||||||||
Unrealized
(gain) loss on derivatives
|
1,457 | 1,232 | 622 | 5,248 | ||||||||||||
Stock-based
compensation
|
46 | 72 | 95 | 186 | ||||||||||||
Change
in assets and liabilities:
|
||||||||||||||||
(Increase)
decrease in accounts receivable and refundable taxes
|
4,078 | 3,442 | 3,675 | 19,337 | ||||||||||||
(Increase)
decrease in inventories
|
(1,034 | ) | 2,905 | 6,379 | 6,405 | |||||||||||
Increase
(decrease) in accounts payable
|
7,805 | (3,672 | ) | 12,454 | (21,185 | ) | ||||||||||
Increase
(decrease) in accrued expenses
|
(782 | ) | (1,925 | ) | (1,849 | ) | (11,231 | ) | ||||||||
Net
change in derivative assets and liabilities
|
(733 | ) | (153 | ) | (1,772 | ) | 3,502 | |||||||||
Other
|
(2,272 | ) | 874 | (3,120 | ) | (2,065 | ) | |||||||||
Net
cash provided by (used for) operating activities
|
9,772 | (1,305 | ) | 18,908 | (3,708 | ) | ||||||||||
Cash
flows from investing activities:
|
||||||||||||||||
Proceeds
from sale of property and equipment
|
7 | 24 | 42 | 245 | ||||||||||||
Purchase
of property and equipment
|
(188 | ) | (169 | ) | (437 | ) | (1,497 | ) | ||||||||
Sale
of investments
|
— | — | — | 6,674 | ||||||||||||
Software
development costs
|
(310 | ) | (472 | ) | (805 | ) | (1,463 | ) | ||||||||
Other
investments
|
73 | (7 | ) | 56 | (901 | ) | ||||||||||
Net
cash provided by (used for) investing activities
|
(418 | ) | (624 | ) | (1,144 | ) | 3,058 | |||||||||
Cash
flows from financing activities:
|
||||||||||||||||
Proceeds
from exercise of common stock options
|
— | 43 | — | 43 | ||||||||||||
Net
cash provided by financing activities
|
— | 43 | — | 43 | ||||||||||||
Effect
of exchange rate changes on cash
|
(183 | ) | 732 | (1,357 | ) | 909 | ||||||||||
Net
increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
9,171 | (1,154 | ) | 16,407 | 302 | |||||||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
36,018 | 27,850 | 28,782 | 26,394 | ||||||||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at end of period
|
$ | 45,189 | $ | 26,696 | $ | 45,189 | $ | 26,696 |
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed consolidated financial
statements.
5
HURCO
COMPANIES, INC.
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
For
the nine months ended July 31, 2010 and 2009
(In
thousands, except
shares
issued and outstanding)
|
Common
stock
|
Additional
|
Accumulated
other
comprehensive
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Shares
issued
&
outstanding
|
Amount
|
paid-in
capital
|
Retained
earnings
|
income
(loss)
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Balances,
October 31, 2008
|
6,420,851 | $ | 642 | $ | 51,690 | $ | 71,889 | $ | (744 | ) | $ | 123,477 | ||||||||||||
Net
loss
|
— | — | — | (1,158 | ) | — | (1,158 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Translation
of foreign currency financial statements
|
— | — | — | — | 2,070 | 2,070 | ||||||||||||||||||
Realized
gains on derivative instruments reclassified into operations, net of tax
of $11
|
— | — | — | — | 17 | 17 | ||||||||||||||||||
Unrealized
loss on derivative instruments, net of tax of ($2,184)
|
— | — | — | — | (3,546 | ) | (3,546 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Reversal
of unrealized loss on investments, net
of tax
|
— | — | — | — | 202 | 202 | ||||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive
loss
|
— | — | — | — | — | (2,415 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Exercise
of common stock options
|
20,000 | 2 | 41 | — | — | 43 | ||||||||||||||||||
Stock-based
compensation expense
|
— | — | 186 | — | — | 186 | ||||||||||||||||||
Balances,
July 31, 2009 (Unaudited)
|
6,440,851 | $ | 644 | $ | 51,917 | $ | 70,731 | $ | (2,001 | ) | $ | 121,291 | ||||||||||||
Balances,
October 31, 2009
|
6,440,851 | $ | 644 | $ | 52,003 | $ | 69,568 | $ | (1,839 | ) | $ | 120,376 | ||||||||||||
Net
loss
|
— | — | — | (4,582 | ) | — | (4,582 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Translation
of foreign currency financial statements
|
— | — | — | — | (2,262 | ) | (2,262 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Realized
losses on derivative instruments reclassified into operations, net of tax
of $(61)
|
— | — | — | — | (99 | ) | (99 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Unrealized
gain on derivative instruments, net of tax of $319
|
— | — | — | — | 518 | 518 | ||||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive
loss
|
— | — | — | — | — | (6,425 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Stock-based
compensation expense
|
— | — | 95 | — | — | 95 | ||||||||||||||||||
Balances,
July 31, 2010 (Unaudited)
|
6,440,851 | $ | 644 | $ | 52,098 | $ | 64,986 | $ | (3,682 | ) | $ | 114,046 |
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed consolidated financial
statements.
6
NOTES TO CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
1.
|
GENERAL
|
The
unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of
Hurco Companies, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries. As used in
this report, and unless the context indicates otherwise, the terms “we”, “us”,
“our” and similar language refer to Hurco Companies, Inc. and its consolidated
subsidiaries. We design and produce computerized machine tools, interactive
computer control systems and software for sale through our distribution network
to the worldwide metal cutting market. We also provide software options,
computer control upgrades, accessories and replacement parts for our products,
as well as customer service and training support.
The
condensed financial information as of July 31, 2010 and for the three and nine
months ended July 31, 2010 and July 31, 2009 is unaudited; however, in our
opinion, the interim data includes all adjustments, consisting only of normal
recurring adjustments, necessary to present fairly our consolidated financial
position, results of operations, changes in shareholders’ equity and cash flows
at the end of the interim periods. We suggest that you read these
condensed consolidated financial statements in conjunction with the financial
statements and the notes thereto included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the year ended October 31, 2009.
Certain
amounts in the 2009 condensed consolidated financial statements have been
reclassified to conform to the July 31, 2010 presentation. These classifications
had no effect on the previously reported net income (loss).
2.
|
DERIVATIVE
INSTRUMENTS AND HEDGING ACTIVITIES
|
On
February 1, 2009, we adopted FASB guidance related to disclosures about
derivative instruments and hedging activities. The adoption of this
guidance has not had a material impact on our consolidated financial position or
results of operations, but does require increased disclosure of our derivative
and hedging activities, including how derivative and hedging activities affect
our consolidated financial statements. These disclosures are provided
below.
We are
exposed to certain market risks relating to our ongoing business operations,
including foreign currency risk, interest rate risk and credit
risk. We manage our exposure to these and other market risks through
regular operating and financing activities. Currently, the only risk
that we manage through the use of derivative instruments is foreign currency
risk.
We
operate on a global basis and are exposed to the risk that our financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows could be adversely affected by
changes in foreign currency exchange rates. To reduce the potential
effects of foreign exchange rate movements on our net equity investment in one
of our foreign subsidiaries, gross profit and net earnings, we enter into
derivative financial instruments in the form of foreign exchange forward
contracts with a major financial institution. We are primarily
exposed to foreign currency exchange rate risk with respect to transactions and
net assets denominated in Euros, Pounds Sterling, Canadian Dollars, South
African Rand, Singapore Dollars and New Taiwan Dollars.
We record
all derivative instruments as assets or liabilities at fair value.
Derivatives Designated as
Hedging Instruments
We enter
into foreign currency forward exchange contracts periodically to hedge certain
forecasted inter-company sales and purchases denominated in foreign currencies
(the Pound Sterling, Euro and New Taiwan Dollar). The purpose of
these instruments is to mitigate the risk that the U.S. Dollar net cash inflows
and outflows resulting from sales and purchases denominated in foreign
currencies will be adversely affected by changes in exchange
rates. These forward contracts have been designated as cash flow
hedge instruments, and are recorded in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
at fair value in Derivative assets and Derivative liabilities. The
effective portion of the gains and losses resulting from the changes in the fair
value of these hedge contracts are deferred in Accumulated other comprehensive
loss and recognized as an adjustment to Cost of sales and service in the period
that the corresponding inventory sold that is the subject of the related hedge
contract is recognized, thereby providing an offsetting economic impact against
the corresponding change in the U.S. Dollar value of the inter-company sale or
purchase being hedged. The ineffective portion of gains and losses
resulting from the changes in the fair value of these hedge contracts is
reported in Other (income) expense, net immediately. We perform
quarterly assessments of hedge effectiveness by verifying and documenting the
critical terms of the hedge instrument and determining that forecasted
transactions have not changed significantly. We also assess on
a quarterly basis whether there have been adverse developments regarding the
risk of a counterparty default.
7
We had
forward contracts outstanding as of July 31, 2010, denominated in Euros, Pounds
Sterling and New Taiwan Dollars with set maturity dates ranging from August 2010
through July 2011. The contract amounts, expressed at forward rates
in U.S. Dollars at July 31, 2010, were $20.4 million for Euros, $5.2 million for
Pounds Sterling and $22.1 million for New Taiwanese
Dollars. At July 31, 2010, we had approximately $42,000
of losses, net of tax, related to cash flow hedges deferred in Accumulated other
comprehensive loss. Of this amount, $275,000 represents unrealized
losses, net of tax, related to cash flow hedge instruments that remain subject
to currency fluctuation risk. The majority of these deferred losses
will be recorded as an adjustment to Cost of sales and service in periods
through July 2011, when the corresponding inventory that is the subject of the
related hedge contract is sold, as described above.
We are
also exposed to foreign currency exchange risk related to our investment in net
assets in foreign countries. To manage this risk, we have
maintained a forward contract with a notional amount of €3.0
million. We designated this forward contract as a hedge of our net
investment in Euro denominated assets. We selected the forward method
under FASB guidance related to the accounting for derivatives instruments and
hedging activities. The forward method requires all changes in the fair value of
the contract to be reported as a cumulative translation adjustment in
Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax, in the same manner as the
underlying hedged net assets. This forward contract matured on
November 24, 2009 and we entered into a new forward contract for the same
notional amount that is set to mature in November 2010. At July 31,
2010, we had $23,000 of realized losses and $343,000 of unrealized gains, net of
tax, recorded as cumulative translation adjustments in Accumulated other
comprehensive loss related to this forward contract.
Derivatives Not Designated
as Hedging Instruments
We also
enter into foreign currency forward exchange contracts to protect against the
effects of foreign currency fluctuations on receivables and payables denominated
in foreign currencies. These derivative instruments are not designated as hedges
under FASB guidance and, as a result, changes in their fair value are reported
currently as Other (income) expense, net in the Condensed Consolidated
Statements of Operations consistent with the transaction gain or loss on the
related receivables and payables denominated in foreign currencies.
We had
forward contracts outstanding as of July 31, 2010, in Euros, Pounds Sterling,
Canadian Dollars, South African Rand, Singapore Dollars and New Taiwan Dollars
with set maturity dates ranging from August 2010 through March
2011. The amounts of these contracts at forward rates in U.S. Dollars
at July 31, 2010 for Euros, Pounds Sterling, Canadian Dollars, South African
Rand, New Taiwan Dollars and Singapore Dollars totaled $18.9
million.
8
Fair Value of Derivative
Instruments
We
recognize the fair value of derivative instruments as assets and liabilities on
a gross basis on our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. As of
July 31, 2010 and October 31, 2009, all derivative instruments were recorded at
fair value on the balance sheets as follows (in thousands):
2010
|
|
2009
|
|||||||||
Balance
sheet
|
Fair
|
Balance
sheet
|
Fair
|
||||||||
Derivatives
|
location
|
value
|
location
|
value
|
|||||||
Designated
as hedging instruments:
|
|||||||||||
Foreign
exchange forward contracts
|
Derivative
assets
|
$ | 1,256 |
Derivative
assets
|
$ | 74 | |||||
Foreign
exchange forward contracts
|
Derivative liabilities
|
$ | 1,147 |
Derivative liabilities
|
$ | 1,246 | |||||
Not designated as hedging instruments:
|
|||||||||||
Foreign
exchange forward contracts
|
Derivative
assets
|
$ | 31 |
Derivative
assets
|
$ | 302 | |||||
Foreign
exchange forward contracts
|
Derivative
liabilities
|
$ | 369 |
Derivative
liabilities
|
$ | 988 |
Effect of Derivative
Instruments on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets and Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity and
Operations
Derivative
instruments had the following effects on our Condensed Consolidated Balance
Sheets and Condensed Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity
and Operations during the three months ended July 31, 2010 and 2009 (in
thousands):
Derivatives
|
Amount of gain (loss)
recognized in other
comprehensive loss
Three months ended July 31,
|
Location of gain (loss)
reclassified from other
comprehensive loss
|
Amount of gain (loss)
reclassified from other
comprehensive loss
Three months ended July 31,
|
||||||||||||||
2010
|
2009
|
2010
|
2009
|
||||||||||||||
Designated
as hedging instruments:
(Effective
portion)
|
|||||||||||||||||
Foreign
exchange forward contracts
– Intercompany sales/purchases |
$ | (803 | ) | $ | (3,135 | ) |
Cost
of sales and service
|
$ | ( 39 | ) | $ | 687 | |||||
Foreign
exchange forward contract
–
Net investment
|
$ | 81 | $ | (300 | ) |
As a
result of the global recession we had to close hedge contracts before maturity
due to forecasted reductions in production and sales. Those contracts
closed early were deemed ineffective for financial reporting purposes and as a
result we recognized a gain of $27,000 for the three months ended July 31, 2010,
and a gain of $225,000 for the three months ended July 31, 2009.
Location
of gain (loss)
|
Amount
of gain (loss)
|
|||||||||
Derivatives
|
recognized in operations
Three months ended July 31,
|
recognized in operations
Three months ended July 31,
|
||||||||
2010
|
2009
|
|||||||||
Not
designated as hedging instruments:
|
||||||||||
Foreign
exchange forward contracts
|
Other
(income) expense, net
|
$ | (41 | ) | $ | (2,484 | ) |
9
Derivative
instruments had the following effects on our Condensed Consolidated Balance
Sheets and Condensed Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity
and Operations during the nine months ended July 31, 2010 and 2009 (in
thousands):
Derivatives
|
Amount of gain (loss)
recognized in other
comprehensive loss
Nine months ended July 31,
|
Location of gain (loss)
reclassified from other
comprehensive loss
|
Amount of gain (loss)
reclassified from other
comprehensive loss
Nine months ended July 31,
|
||||||||||||||
2010
|
2009
|
2010
|
2009
|
||||||||||||||
Designated
as hedging instruments:
(Effective
portion)
|
|||||||||||||||||
Foreign
exchange forward contracts
–
Intercompany sales/purchases
|
$ | 837 | $ | (5,730 | ) |
Cost
of sales and service
|
$ | (160 | ) | $ | 28 | ||||||
Foreign
exchange forward contract
–
Net investment
|
$ | 482 | $ | (448 | ) |
As a
result of the global recession we had to close hedge contracts before maturity
due to forecasted reductions in production and sales. Those contracts
closed early were deemed ineffective for financial reporting purposes and as a
result we recognized a loss of $38,000 for the nine months ended July 31, 2010,
and a gain of $2.7 million for the nine months ended July 31, 2009.
Location
of gain (loss)
|
Amount
of gain (loss)
|
|||||||||
Derivatives
|
recognized
in operations
Nine
months ended July 31,
|
recognized
in operations
Nine
months ended July 31,
|
||||||||
2010
|
2009
|
|||||||||
Not
designated as hedging instruments:
|
||||||||||
Foreign
exchange forward contracts
|
Other
(income) expense,
net
|
$ | 1,293 | $ | (3,592 | ) |
3.
|
STOCK
OPTIONS
|
In March
2008, we adopted the Hurco Companies, Inc. 2008 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2008
Plan”), which allows us to grant awards of stock options, Stock Appreciation
Rights settled in stock (SARs), restricted shares, performance shares and
performance units. The 2008 Plan replaced the 1997 Stock Option and
Incentive Plan (the “1997 Plan”) which expired in March 2007. The
Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors has authority to determine the
officers, directors and key employees who will be granted awards; designate the
number of shares subject to each award; determine the terms and conditions upon
which awards will be granted; and prescribe the form and terms of award
agreements. We have granted stock options under both plans which are
currently outstanding. No stock option may be exercised more than ten
years after the date of grant or such shorter period as the Compensation
Committee may determine at the date of grant. The total number of
shares of our common stock that may be issued as awards under the 2008 Plan is
750,000. The market value of a share of our common stock, for
purposes of the 2008 Plan, is the closing sale price as reported by the Nasdaq
Global Select Market on the date in question or, if not a trading day, on the
last preceding trading date.
On
December 18, 2009, the Compensation Committee granted a total of 30,000 stock
options under the 2008 Plan to four executive employees. The fair
value of the options was estimated on the date of grant using a Black-Scholes
valuation model with assumptions for expected volatility based on the historical
volatility of our common stock of 65%, expected term of the options, dividend
yield rate of 0% and a risk-free interest rate of 2.3% based upon the five-year
U.S. Treasury yield as of the date of grant. The options vest over a
three-year period beginning one year from the date of grant. Based
upon the foregoing factors, the grant date fair value of the stock options was
determined to be $8.29 per share.
10
On May
13, 2010, the Compensation Committee granted a total of 20,000 stock options
under the 2008 Plan to four executive employees. The fair value of
the options was estimated on the date of grant using a Black-Scholes valuation
model with assumptions for expected volatility based on the historical
volatility of our common stock of 63%, expected term of the options, dividend
yield rate of 0% and a risk-free interest rate of 2.3% based upon the five-year
U.S. Treasury yield as of the date of grant. The options vest over a
three-year period beginning one year from the date of grant. Based
upon the foregoing factors, the grant date fair value of the stock options was
determined to be $9.90 per share.
During
the first nine months of fiscal 2010 and 2009, we recorded approximately $95,000
and $186,000, respectively, of stock-based compensation expense related to
grants under the plans. As of July 31, 2010, there was approximately
$514,000 of total unrecognized stock-based compensation cost that we expect to
recognize by the end of fiscal 2014.
A summary
of stock option activity for the nine-month period ended July 31, 2010, is as
follows:
Stock
options
|
Weighted
average
exercise
price
|
|||||||
Outstanding
at October 31, 2009
|
65,369 | $ | 24.11 | |||||
Options
granted
|
50,000 | 16.14 | ||||||
Options
exercised
|
— | — | ||||||
Options
cancelled
|
— | — | ||||||
Outstanding
at July 31, 2010
|
115,369 | $ | 20.66 |
Summarized
information about outstanding stock options as of July 31, 2010, those are
already vested and those that are expected to vest, as well as stock options
that are currently exercisable, are as follows:
Options already
vested and expected
to vest
|
Options currently
exercisable
|
|||||||
Number
of outstanding options
|
115,369 | 51,369 | ||||||
Weighted
average remaining contractual life (years)
|
8.10 | 6.11 | ||||||
Weighted
average exercise price per share
|
$ | 20.66 | $ | 26.62 | ||||
Intrinsic
value
|
$ | 111,000 | $ | 21,000 |
The
intrinsic value of a stock option is calculated as the difference between the
stock price as of July 31, 2010 and the exercise price of the
option.
11
4.
|
EARNINGS
(LOSSES) PER SHARE
|
Basic
earnings (losses) per common share are based on the weighted average number of
shares of our common stock outstanding during the period. Diluted
earnings (losses) per common share give effect to shares underlying outstanding
stock options using the treasury method when applied to our basic earnings
(losses) per share. The following table presents a reconciliation of
our basic and diluted earnings (losses) per share computation:
Three months ended
July 31,
|
Nine months ended
July 31,
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(in thousands, except per share
amount)
|
2010
|
2009
|
2010
|
2009
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Basic
|
Diluted
|
Basic
|
Diluted
|
Basic
|
Diluted
|
Basic
|
Diluted
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net
loss
|
$ | (1,173 | ) | $ | (1,173 | ) | $ | (1,231 | ) | $ | (1,231 | ) | $ | (4,582 | ) | $ | (4,582 | ) | $ | (1,158 | ) | $ | (1,158 | ) | ||||||||
Weighted
average shares outstanding
|
6,441 | 6,441 | 6,434 | 6,434 | 6,441 | 6,441 | 6,425 | 6,425 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Assumed
issuances under stock options plans
|
— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
6,441 | 6,441 | 6,434 | 6,434 | 6,441 | 6,441 | 6,425 | 6,425 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Loss
per share
|
$ | (0.18 | ) | $ | (0.18 | ) | $ | (0.19 | ) | $ | (0.19 | ) | $ | (0.71 | ) | $ | (0.71 | ) | $ | (0.18 | ) | $ | (0.18 | ) |
5.
|
ACCOUNTS
RECEIVABLE
|
Accounts
receivable are net of allowances for doubtful accounts of $546,000 as of July
31, 2010 and $809,000 as of October 31, 2009.
6.
|
INVENTORIES
|
Inventories,
priced at the lower of cost (first-in, first-out method) or market, are
summarized below (in thousands):
July 31, 2010
|
October 31, 2009
|
|||||||
Purchased
parts and sub-assemblies
|
$ | 15,583 | $ | 14,961 | ||||
Work-in-process
|
9,208 | 3,559 | ||||||
Finished
goods
|
26,236 | 41,761 | ||||||
$ | 51,027 | $ | 60,281 |
7.
|
SEGMENT
INFORMATION
|
We
operate in a single segment: industrial automation systems. We design and
produce interactive computer control systems and software and computerized
machine tools for sale through our own distribution network to the worldwide
metal-working market. We also provide software options, control upgrades,
accessories and replacement parts for our products, as well as customer service
and training support.
8.
|
GUARANTEES
AND WARRANTIES
|
From time
to time, our subsidiaries guarantee third party payment obligations in
connection with the sale of machines to customers that use
financing. We follow FASB guidance for accounting for contingencies
with respect to these guarantees. As of July 31, 2010, we had
34 outstanding third party payment guarantees totaling approximately $1.8
million. The terms of these guarantees are consistent with the underlying
customer financing terms. Upon shipment of a machine, the customer
has the risk of ownership. The customer does not obtain title, however, until it
has paid for the machine. A retention of title clause allows us to
recover the machine if the customer defaults on the financing. We accrue for
potential liabilities under these guarantees when we believe a loss is probable
and can be estimated.
12
We
provide warranties on our products with respect to defects in material and
workmanship. The terms of these warranties are generally one year for machines
and shorter periods for service parts. We recognize a reserve with
respect to this obligation at the time of product sale, with subsequent warranty
claims recorded against the reserve. The amount of the warranty reserve is
determined based on historical trend experience and any known warranty issues
that could cause future warranty costs to differ from historical
experience. A reconciliation of the changes in our warranty reserve
is as follows (in thousands):
Nine months ended
|
||||||||
July 31, 2010
|
July 31, 2009
|
|||||||
Balance,
beginning of period
|
$ | 1,286 | $ | 2,536 | ||||
Provision
for warranties during the period
|
1,285 | 611 | ||||||
Charges
to the reserve
|
(1,329 | ) | (1,534 | ) | ||||
Impact
of foreign currency translation
|
(59 | ) | 22 | |||||
Balance,
end of period
|
$ | 1,183 | $ | 1,635 |
9.
|
COMPREHENSIVE
LOSS
|
A
reconciliation of our net income (loss) to comprehensive loss is as follows (in
thousands):
Three months ended
|
||||||||
July 31, 2010
|
July 31, 2009
|
|||||||
Net
loss
|
$ | (1,173 | ) | $ | (1,231 | ) | ||
Translation
of foreign currency financial statements
|
(645 | ) | 2,005 | |||||
Realized
(loss) gain on derivative instruments reclassified into operations, net of
tax
|
(24 | ) | 425 | |||||
Unrealized
loss on derivative instruments, net of tax
|
(497 | ) | (1,940 | ) | ||||
Comprehensive
loss
|
$ | (2,339 | ) | $ | (741 | ) |
10.
|
DEBT
AGREEMENTS
|
We are
party to an unsecured domestic credit agreement that provides us with a $15.0
million unsecured revolving credit facility and maximum outstanding letters of
credit of $3.0 million. The domestic credit agreement also provides
for a separate uncommitted demand credit facility in the amount of 100.0 million
New Taiwan Dollars. We also have a £1.0 million revolving credit
facility in the United Kingdom and a €1.5 million revolving credit facility in
Germany. The domestic and United Kingdom facilities mature on December 7,
2012. The revolving credit facility in Germany does not have an
expiration date.
Borrowings
under the domestic facility may be used for general corporate purposes and bear
interest at a floating rate, based either on LIBOR or the prime rate, plus an
applicable margin. The domestic credit agreement restricts our ability to
declare and pay dividends, incur additional indebtedness other than under this
facility and make acquisitions whenever we have a cumulative net loss for the
most recent four consecutive quarters and for so long thereafter as the
cumulative loss continues. These restrictions are currently in effect
as we have a cumulative net loss for the most recent four consecutive
quarters. The domestic credit agreement contains a financial covenant that
requires no less than a 1:00 to 1:00 ratio of excess cash (defined as cash minus
debt) to an annualized net loss (defined as a net loss for the two most recent
consecutive quarters multiplied by two). After achieving cumulative
income for four consecutive quarters we are required to maintain a ratio of 0.5
to 1.0 of total indebtedness to the sum of total indebtedness and net
worth.
As of
July 31, 2010 and October 31, 2009, we had no debt or borrowings outstanding
under any of our credit facilities and no outstanding letters of
credit. As of July 31, 2010, we had unutilized credit facilities of
$21.6 million available for either direct borrowings or commercial letters of
credit.
13
11.
|
INCOME
TAXES
|
Our
unrecognized tax benefits were $195,000 as of July 31, 2010 and $670,000 as of
October 31, 2009, and in each case included accrued
interest. During the third quarter of fiscal 2010, we
recorded a benefit for income taxes of $495,000 due to the expiration of
statutes of limitations on uncertain tax benefits which resulted in an increase
in our effective tax rate for the three and nine months ended July 31, 2010
compared to same periods in prior year.
We
recognize accrued interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits as
components of our income tax provision. We believe our unrecognized
tax positions meet the minimum statutory threshold to avoid payment of penalties
and, therefore, no tax penalties have been estimated. As of July 31,
2010, the gross amount of interest accrued, reported in Accrued expenses and
other, was approximately $16,000, which did not include the federal tax benefit
of interest deductions.
We file
U.S. federal and state income tax returns, as well as tax returns in several
foreign jurisdictions. The statutes of limitations with respect to
unrecognized tax benefits will expire between July 2011 and August
2013.
12.
|
FINANCIAL
INSTRUMENTS
|
The
carrying amounts for our trade receivables and payables approximate their fair
values. We also have financial instruments in the form of foreign
currency forward exchange contracts. The U.S. Dollar equivalent
notional amount of these contracts was $71.2 million and $50.8 million at July
31, 2010 and October 31, 2009, respectively. The fair value of
Derivative assets recorded on our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets at July
31, 2010 and October 31, 2009 was $1.3 million and $376,000,
respectively. The fair value of Derivative liabilities recorded on
our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets at July 31, 2010 and October 31, 2009
was $1.5 million and $2.2 million, respectively.
The
future value of our foreign currency forward exchange contracts and the related
currency positions are subject to offsetting market risk resulting from foreign
currency exchange rate volatility. The counterparties to these
contracts are substantial and creditworthy financial institutions. We
do not consider the risks of counterparty non-performance to be
material.
On
November 1, 2008, we adopted FASB guidance related to fair value measurements as
it relates to financial assets and liabilities recorded on a recurring
basis.
This
guidance established a three-tier fair value hierarchy, which categorizes the
inputs used in measuring fair value. These tiers include: Level 1,
defined as observable inputs, such as quoted prices in active markets; Level 2,
defined as inputs other than quoted prices in active markets that are either
directly or indirectly observable; and Level 3, defined as unobservable inputs
in which little or no market data exist, therefore requiring an entity to
develop its own assumptions. In accordance with this guidance, the
following table represents the fair value hierarchy for our financial assets and
liabilities measured at fair value as of July 31, 2010 and October 31, 2009 (in
thousands):
Assets
|
Liabilities
|
|||||||||||||||
July 31,
2010
|
October 31,
2009
|
July 31,
2010
|
October 31,
2009
|
|||||||||||||
Level 1
|
||||||||||||||||
Deferred
Compensation
|
$ | 621 | $ | 642 | $ | - | $ | - | ||||||||
Level 2
|
||||||||||||||||
Derivatives
|
$ | 1,287 | $ | 376 | $ | 1,516 | $ | 2,234 | ||||||||
Total
|
$ | 1,908 | $ | 1,018 | $ | 1,516 | $ | 2,234 |
14
Included
in Level 1 assets are mutual fund investments under a nonqualified deferred
compensation plan. We estimate the fair value of these investments on
a recurring basis using market prices which are readily
available. Included as Level 2 fair value measurements are
derivative assets and liabilities related to hedged and unhedged gains and
losses on foreign currency forward exchange contracts entered into with a third
party. We estimate the fair value of these derivatives on a recurring
basis using foreign currency exchange rates obtained from active
markets.
15
Item
2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND
ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
EXECUTIVE
OVERVIEW
Hurco
Companies, Inc. is an industrial technology company operating in a single
segment. We design and produce computerized machine tools, featuring
our proprietary computer control systems and software, for sale through our own
distribution network to the worldwide metal cutting market. We also
provide software options, control upgrades, accessories and replacement parts
for our products, as well as customer service and training support.
The
following overview is intended to provide a brief explanation of the principal
factors that have contributed to our recent financial
performance. This overview is intended to be read in conjunction with
the more detailed information included in our unaudited financial statements
that appear elsewhere in this report.
Until the
recent global recession, we had experienced a period of sustained growth in
sales and earnings due to the strong worldwide demand for machine tools, the
expansion of our product line to include higher-priced and higher-margin
products, increased customer acceptance of our products, and the strength of our
selling and manufacturing operations outside the United States. Since
the end of fiscal 2008, our operational performance has been adversely affected
by the global economic recession and its lingering effects on the market for
machine tools.
The
market for machine tools is international in scope. We have both
significant foreign sales and foreign manufacturing
operations. During the first nine months of fiscal 2009,
approximately 68% of our revenues were attributable to customers located outside
of North America. During the first nine months of fiscal 2010, 73% of
our revenues were attributable to foreign customers. This increase in
foreign revenues is driven by increased market demand in the Asia Pacific region
where we sell more of our entry level, lower-priced VM series machines and where
competitive price pressures exist. Due to the continued economic
conditions in Europe we have seen a reduction in our sales to that region where
we typically sell our higher performance VMX series machines at higher prices
and margins. We sell our products through more than 100 independent
agents and distributors in countries throughout North America, Europe and
Asia. We also have our own direct sales and service organizations in
Canada, China, France, Germany, Italy, Poland, Spain, Singapore, South Africa,
the United Kingdom and certain parts of the United States. The vast
majority of our machine tools are manufactured to our specifications primarily
by our wholly owned subsidiary in Taiwan, Hurco Manufacturing Limited
(HML). Machine castings and components to support HML’s production
are manufactured at our facility in Ningbo, China. We also
manufacture machine tools for the Chinese market at the Ningbo
plant.
Our sales
to foreign customers are denominated, and payments by those customers are made,
in the prevailing currencies—primarily the Euro and Pound Sterling—in the
countries in which those customers are located. Our product costs are incurred
and paid primarily in the New Taiwan Dollar and the U.S.
Dollar. Changes in currency exchange rates may have a material effect
on our operating results and consolidated balance sheets as reported under U.S.
Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. For example, when the U.S.
Dollar weakens in value relative to a foreign currency, sales made, and expenses
incurred, in that currency when translated to U.S. Dollars for reporting in our
financial statements, are higher than would be the case when the U.S. Dollar is
stronger. In our comparison of period-to-period results, we discuss
the effect of currency translation on those results including the increases or
decreases in those results as reported in our financial statements (which
reflect translation to U.S. Dollars at exchange rates prevailing during the
period covered by those financial statements) and also the effect that changes
in exchange rates had on those results.
Our high
levels of foreign manufacturing and sales also subject us to cash flow risks due
to fluctuating currency exchange rates. We seek to mitigate those
risks through the use of various derivative instruments – principally foreign
currency forward exchange contracts.
16
In
response to the global recession, beginning in the fourth quarter of fiscal
2008, we implemented various cost saving initiatives to reduce expenses while
staying committed to our strategic plan of product innovation and penetration of
developing markets.
During
the third quarter of fiscal 2010, sales were 39% above those in the third
quarter of fiscal 2009. Orders for the third quarter of fiscal 2010
were 56% higher than the third quarter of fiscal 2009. Based upon our
current inventory position and order level, we have started increasing our
production levels to be in line with the current trend of increasing order
demand.
RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS
Three Months Ended July 31,
2010 Compared to Three Months Ended July 31, 2009
Sales and Service
Fees. Sales and service fees for the third quarter of fiscal
2010 totaled $26.5 million, an increase of $7.4 million, or 39%, from the third
quarter of fiscal 2009. The effect of a stronger U.S. Dollar when
translating foreign sales to U.S. Dollars for financial reporting purposes had
an unfavorable impact of approximately 7%, or $1.3 million, on the
period-to-period comparison.
The
following tables set forth net sales (in thousands) by geographic region and
product category for the third quarter of 2010 and 2009,
respectively:
Net Sales and Service Fees by Geographic Region
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Three months ended July 31,
|
Change
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
2010
|
2009
|
Amount
|
%
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
North
America
|
$ | 7,208 | 27.2 | % | $ | 5,809 | 30.5 | % | $ | 1,399 | 24.1 | % | ||||||||||||
Europe
|
15,896 | 60.1 | % | 11,777 | 61.9 | % | 4,119 | 35.0 | % | |||||||||||||||
Asia
Pacific
|
3,370 | 12.7 | % | 1,453 | 7.6 | % | 1,917 | 131.9 | % | |||||||||||||||
Total
|
$ | 26,474 | 100.0 | % | $ | 19,039 | 100.0 | % | $ | 7,435 | 39.1 | % |
The third
quarter increase in sales was primarily driven by increased demand for vertical
machining centers in all sales regions, with the largest percentage increase in
the Asia Pacific region. Compared to the third quarter of fiscal 2009, unit
shipments for the third quarter of fiscal 2010 increased in North America by
25%, in Europe by 38%, and in the Asia Pacific sales region by
123%. The increase in the Asia Pacific region during the third
quarter of fiscal 2010 was primarily the result of increased shipments in China
and India of our entry-level, lower-priced VM series machines and increased
market demand in the other Asia Pacific territories.
Net Sales and Service Fees by Product Category
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Three months ended July 31,
|
Change
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
2010
|
2009
|
Amount
|
%
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Computerized
Machine Tools
|
$ | 22,020 | 83.2 | % | $ | 15,552 | 81.7 | % | $ | 6,468 | 41.6 | % | ||||||||||||
Service
Fees, Parts and Other
|
4,454 | 16.8 | % | 3,487 | 18.3 | % | 967 | 27.7 | % | |||||||||||||||
Total
|
$ | 26,474 | 100.0 | % | $ | 19,039 | 100.0 | % | $ | 7,435 | 39.1 | % |
Unit
shipments of computerized machine tools during the third quarter of fiscal 2010
increased by 46% from the corresponding period in fiscal 2009.
Orders. New order bookings in
the third quarter of fiscal 2010 were $28.0 million, an increase of $10.1
million, or 56%, from the same period in fiscal 2009. Orders
increased in North America by $2.5 million, or 45%, in Europe by $4.3 million,
or 38%, and in Asia Pacific by $3.3 million, or 285%, in each case as compared
to the third quarter of fiscal 2009. The increase in orders reflected
higher demand in China and India for our entry-level, lower-priced VM series
machines and increased demand in the other Asia Pacific
territories. The impact of currency translation on new orders booked
in fiscal 2010 was consistent with its impact on sales.
17
Gross
Profit. Hurco’s gross profit for the third quarter of fiscal
2010 was 18%, compared to 28% for the same period in fiscal 2009. The
decrease in profit as a percentage of sales was the result of machines sold
during the period which were produced at a time of lower production levels that
resulted in higher production costs per machine which increased this period’s
cost of sales. Also contributing to the decrease was a product mix
that included a greater amount of our entry-level, lower margin machines that
were in high demand in the Asia Pacific region where competitive pricing
pressure also exists.
Operating
Expenses. Selling, general and administrative expenses were
$7.0 million for the third quarter of fiscal 2010, a decrease of $206,000, or
3%, from the same period of fiscal 2009. The decrease reflected the benefit of
cost reduction initiatives and the favorable effect of a stronger U.S. dollar in
the third quarter of fiscal 2010 when translating foreign operating expenses to
U.S. dollars for financial reporting purposes, partially offset by an increase
in sales commissions.
Operating Income
(Loss). The operating loss for the third quarter of fiscal
2010 was $2.3 million compared to an operating loss of $1.9 million for the same
period in fiscal 2009. The increase in the operating loss
year-over-year was primarily the result of machines sold during the period which
were produced at a time of lower production levels that resulted in higher
production costs per machine which increased this period’s cost of
sales. Also contributing to the decrease was a product mix that
included a greater amount of our entry-level, lower margin machines that were in
high demand in the Asia Pacific region where competitive pricing pressure also
exists.
Other (Income) Expense,
Net. The decrease in other income of $188,000 for the third
quarter of fiscal 2010 compared to the same period in fiscal 2009 was primarily
due to a reduction of $225,000 in net realized gains on hedge contracts closed
before maturity during the third quarter of fiscal 2009 as a result of
forecasted reductions in production and sales.
Income Taxes. Our
effective tax rate for the third quarter of fiscal 2010 was 51% in comparison to
31% for the same period in fiscal 2009. We recorded a benefit for income taxes
during the third quarter of fiscal 2010 of approximately $1.2 million compared
to a benefit of $552,000 for the same period in fiscal 2009. The increase in the
effective tax rate relates primarily to the recognition of tax benefits of
$495,000 for uncertain tax positions due to expiration of statutes of
limitations.
Nine Months Ended July 31,
2010 Compared to Nine Months Ended July 31, 2009
Sales and Service
Fees. Sales and
service fees for the nine months ended July 31, 2010, totaled $71.2 million, an
increase of $3.3 million, or 5%, from the corresponding period in
2009. Currency translation had a favorable impact on sales for the
first nine months of fiscal 2010 of approximately 2%, or $1.1 million compared
to the same period of fiscal 2009.
The
following tables set forth net sales (in thousands) by geographic region and
product category for the first nine months of 2010 and 2009,
respectively:
Net Sales and Service Fees by Geographic Region
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Nine months ended July 31,
|
Change
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
2010
|
2009
|
Amount
|
%
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
North
America
|
$ | 19,114 | 26.8 | % | $ | 21,618 | 31.9 | % | $ | (2,504 | ) | (11.6 | )% | |||||||||||
Europe
|
43,254 | 60.8 | % | 42,879 | 63.2 | % | 375 | 0.9 | % | |||||||||||||||
Asia
Pacific
|
8,810 | 12.4 | % | 3,338 | 4.9 | % | 5,472 | 164.0 | % | |||||||||||||||
Total
|
$ | 71,178 | 100.0 | % | $ | 67,835 | 100.0 | % | $ | 3,343 | 4.9 | % |
The
increase in sales was primarily driven by higher demand for vertical machining
centers in the Asia Pacific region. Unit shipments for the first nine
months of fiscal 2010 decreased in North America by 27%, increased in Europe by
1% and increased in the Asia Pacific sales region by 212% compared to the same
period in fiscal 2009. The increased sales in the Asia Pacific region
during the first nine months of fiscal 2010 were primarily the result of
increased shipments in China and India of our entry-level, lower-priced VM
series machines and increased demand in the other Asia Pacific
territories.
18
Net Sales and Service Fees by Product Category
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Nine months ended July 31,
|
Change
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
2010
|
2009
|
Amount
|
%
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Computerized
Machine Tools
|
$ | 58,793 | 82.6 | % | $ | 56,019 | 82.6 | % | $ | 2,774 | 5.0 | % | ||||||||||||
Service
Fees, Parts and Other
|
12,385 | 17.4 | % | 11,816 | 17.4 | % | 569 | 4.8 | % | |||||||||||||||
Total
|
$ | 71,178 | 100.0 | % | $ | 67,835 | 100.0 | % | $ | 3,343 | 4.9 | % |
Unit
shipments of computerized machine tools during the first nine months of fiscal
2010 increased by 6% from the corresponding period in fiscal 2009.
Orders. New order bookings in
the first nine months of fiscal 2010 were $79.2 million, an increase of $18.6
million, or 31%, from the same period in fiscal 2009. Orders
increased in North America by $2.9 million, or 16%, in Europe by $7.0 million,
or 18%, and in the Asia Pacific region by $8.7 million, or 316%, compared to the
same period of fiscal 2009. The increase in orders reflected higher
demand in China and India for our entry-level, lower-priced VM series machines
and increased demand in the other Asia Pacific territories. The
impact of currency translation on new orders booked in fiscal 2010 was
consistent with its impact on sales.
Gross
Profit. Hurco’s gross profit for the first nine months of
fiscal 2010 was 19%, compared to 28% for the same period in fiscal
2009. The decrease in profit as a percentage of sales was the result
of machines sold during the period which were produced at a time of lower
production levels that resulted in higher production costs per machine which
increased this period’s cost of sales. Also contributing to the
decrease was a product mix that included a greater amount of our entry-level,
lower margin machines that were in high demand in the Asia Pacific region where
competitive pricing pressure also exists.
Operating
Expenses. Selling, general and administrative expenses were
$20.8 million for the first nine months of fiscal 2010, a decrease of $2.0
million, or 9%, from the same period of fiscal 2009. The decrease reflected
lower sales commissions and the benefit of cost reduction initiatives, partially
offset by the unfavorable effect of a weaker U.S. Dollar in fiscal 2010 when
translating foreign operating expenses to U.S. Dollars for financial reporting
purposes.
Operating Income
(Loss). The operating loss for the first nine months of fiscal
2010 was $7.4 million compared to an operating loss of $3.7 million for the same
period in fiscal 2009. The increase in the operating loss
year-over-year was primarily the result of machines sold during the period which
were produced at a time of lower production levels that resulted in higher
production costs per machine which increased this period’s cost of
sales. Also contributing to the decrease was a product mix that
included a greater amount of our entry-level, lower margin machines that were in
high demand in the Asia Pacific region where competitive pricing pressure also
exists.
Other (Income) Expense,
Net. The decrease in other income of $2.3 million for the
first nine months of fiscal 2010 compared to the same period in fiscal 2009 was
primarily due to a reduction of $2.7 million in net realized gains on hedge
contracts closed before maturity during fiscal 2009 as a result of forecasted
reductions in production and sales.
Income Taxes. Our
effective tax rate for the first nine months of fiscal 2010 was 42% in
comparison to 33% for the same period in fiscal 2009. We recorded a
benefit for income taxes during the first nine months of fiscal 2010 of
approximately $3.3 million compared to a benefit of $564,000 for the same period
in fiscal 2009. The increase in the effective tax rate relates
primarily to the recognition of tax benefits of $495,000 for uncertain tax
positions due to the expiration of statutes of limitations.
19
LIQUIDITY
AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
At July
31, 2010, our cash balance was $45.2 million, compared to $28.8 million at
October 31, 2009. Approximately 76% of the $45.2 million of cash is
in U.S. Dollars. The balance is held outside the U.S. in the local
currencies of our various foreign entities and is subject to fluctuations in
currency exchange rates.
Working
capital, excluding cash and cash equivalents, was $48.1 million at July 31,
2010, compared to $68.7 million at October 31, 2009.
Inventories
were $51.0 million at July 31, 2010, compared to $60.3 million at October 31,
2009. The $9.3 million decrease was due to a combination of lower
production levels and an increase in market demand which decreased finished
goods inventory by $15.5 million or 37%. As a result of the recent
increase in orders, we have started increasing production to meet current order
levels and reduce our backlog. This increase in production has
increased work-in-process inventory by $5.6 million, or 159%. We
continue to evaluate changes in production levels due to changes in customer
demand.
We
believe our cash resources will permit us to stay committed to our strategic
plan of product innovation and targeted penetration of developing markets
despite the lingering effects of the recent global recession. During
the current recession we significantly reduced our production levels and
implemented cost saving initiatives. We are increasing our production
as demand for machine tools increases. However, we may face
challenges due to the continuing economic uncertainties in Europe and the U.S.,
our largest markets and the longer term effect of a stronger U.S. Dollar against
the Euro.
Capital
expenditures during the first nine months of fiscal 2010 were primarily for
implementation of operating systems and software development
costs. We funded these expenditures with cash flow from
operations.
Although
we have not made any significant acquisitions in the recent past and we have no
present plans for acquisitions, we continue to receive and review information on
businesses and assets, including intellectual property assets, which are
available for purchase. Because we have had four consecutive quarters
of net losses, our domestic credit agreement has restrictions on us making
acquisitions, declaring and paying dividends, and incurring additional
indebtedness. These restrictions will remain in effect as long as
this cumulative loss position exists.
NEW
ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
In
January 2010, the FASB issued guidance to improve disclosures about fair value
measurements. Reporting entities will have to provide information
about movements of assets among Levels 1 and 2; and a reconciliation of
purchases, sales, issuance, and settlements of activity valued with a Level 3
method, of the three-tier fair value hierarchy established by previous FASB
guidance. The guidance also clarifies the existing requirements for fair value
measurement disclosures as it relates to each class of assets and liabilities.
The guidance was effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning
after December 15, 2009 for Level 1 and 2 disclosure requirements and after
December 15, 2010 for Level 3 disclosure requirements. We adopted this
guidance in the third quarter of fiscal 2010 and it did not have a material
impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In
February 2010, the FASB issued various non-substantive amendments to the FASB
Codification that do not fundamentally change existing GAAP; however, certain
amendments altered the application of GAAP as it relates to derivatives and
income taxes. The amended guidance was effective beginning in the first interim
or annual period beginning after the release date, except for certain
amendments. We adopted this guidance in the third quarter of fiscal 2010 and it
did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial
statements.
On
February 2010, the FASB issued amendments to certain recognition and
disclosure requirements. This guidance removes the requirement that SEC filers
disclose the date through which subsequent events have been evaluated. This
amendment alleviates potential conflicts between previous guidance and the SEC’s
requirements. The guidance became effective upon issuance and we adopted this
guidance during the first quarter of fiscal 2010.
20
CRITICAL
ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Our
accounting policies, which are described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the fiscal year ended October 31, 2009, require management to make significant
estimates and assumptions using information available at the time the estimates
are made. These estimates and assumptions significantly affect various reported
amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues, and expenses. If our future
experience differs materially from these estimates and assumptions, our results
of operations and financial condition would be affected. There were no material
changes to our critical accounting policies during the first nine months of
fiscal 2010.
CONTRACTUAL
OBLIGATIONS AND COMMITMENTS
There
have been no material changes related to contractual obligations and commitments
from the information provided in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal
year ended October 31, 2009.
OFF
BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS
From time
to time, our subsidiaries guarantee third party payment obligations in
connection with the sale of machines to customers that use
financing. We follow FASB guidance for accounting for contingencies
with respect to these guarantees. As of July 31, 2010, we had
34 outstanding third party payment guarantees totaling approximately $1.8
million. The terms of these guarantees are consistent with the underlying
customer financing terms. Upon shipment of a machine, the customer has the risk
of ownership. The customer does not obtain title, however, until it has paid for
the machine. A retention of title clause allows us to recover the
machine if the customer defaults on the financing. We accrue for potential
liabilities under these guarantees when we believe a loss is probable and can be
estimated.
CAUTIONARY
STATEMENT CONCERNING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
Certain
statements made in this report constitute “forward-looking statements” within
the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.
Forward-looking statements are subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties
and other factors that may cause our actual results, performance or achievements
to be materially different from those expressed or implied by the statements.
These risks, uncertainties and other factors include:
|
·
|
The
impact of continuing economic uncertainty on demand for our products,
particularly in Europe and the
U.S.;
|
|
·
|
The
cyclical nature of the machine tool
industry;
|
|
·
|
The
risks of our international
operations;
|
|
·
|
The
limited number of our manufacturing
sources;
|
|
·
|
The
effects of changes in currency exchange
rates;
|
|
·
|
Our
dependence on new product
development;
|
|
·
|
The
need to make technological
advances;
|
|
·
|
Competition
with larger companies that have greater financial
resources;
|
|
·
|
Changes
in the prices of raw materials, especially steel and iron
products;
|
|
·
|
Possible
obsolescence of our technology;
|
|
·
|
Acquisitions
that could disrupt our operations and affect operating
results;
|
|
·
|
Impairment
of our assets;
|
|
·
|
The
need to protect our intellectual property
assets;
|
|
·
|
The
impact of the continuing downturn in the global
economy;
|
|
·
|
The
impact of ongoing disruptions in the credit markets on our investment
securities; and
|
|
·
|
The
effect of the loss of key
personnel.
|
We
discuss these and other important risks and uncertainties that may affect our
future operation in Part I, Item 1A – Risk Factors in our most recent Annual
Report on Form 10-K and may update that discussion in Part II, Item 1A – Risk
Factors in this report or a Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q we file
hereafter.
21
Readers
are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking
statements. While we believe the assumptions on which the
forward-looking statements are based are reasonable, there can be no assurance
that these forward-looking statements will prove to be accurate. This cautionary
statement is applicable to all forward-looking statements contained in this
report.
22
Item
3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE
DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Interest Rate
Risk
Interest
on borrowings on our bank credit agreements are tied to prevailing U.S. and
European interest rates. At July 31, 2010, there were no outstanding
borrowings under our bank credit agreements.
Foreign Currency Exchange
Risk
In fiscal
2009, we derived more than 70% of our revenues from foreign
markets. All of our computerized machine tools and computer control
systems, as well as certain proprietary service parts, are sourced by our
U.S.-based engineering and manufacturing division and re-invoiced to our foreign
sales and service subsidiaries, primarily in their functional
currencies.
Our
products are sourced from foreign suppliers or built to our specifications by
either our wholly owned subsidiary in Taiwan or an affiliated contract
manufacturer. Our purchases are predominantly in foreign currencies and in some
cases our arrangements with these suppliers include foreign currency risk
sharing agreements, which reduce (but do not eliminate) the effects of currency
fluctuations on product costs. The predominant portion of the exchange rate risk
associated with our product purchases relates to the New Taiwan
Dollar.
We enter
into foreign currency forward exchange contracts from time to time to hedge the
cash flow risk related to forecasted inter-company sales and purchases
denominated in, or based on, foreign currencies (primarily the Euro, Pound
Sterling, and New Taiwan Dollar). We also enter into foreign currency forward
exchange contracts to protect against the effects of foreign currency
fluctuations on receivables and payables denominated in foreign currencies. We
do not speculate in the financial markets and, therefore, do not enter into
these contracts for trading purposes.
Forward
contracts for the sale or purchase of foreign currencies as of July 31, 2010,
which are designated as cash flow hedges under FASB guidance related to
accounting for derivative instruments and hedging activities were as
follows:
Notional
Amount
|
Weighted
Avg.
|
Contract Amount at
Forward Rates in
U.S. Dollars
|
|||||||||||||||
Forward Contracts
|
in Foreign
Currency
|
Forward
Rate
|
Contract
Date
|
July 31,
2010
|
Maturity Dates
|
||||||||||||
Sale
Contracts:
|
|||||||||||||||||
Euro
|
15,650,000 | 1.3124 | 20,538,687 | 20,416,813 |
August
2010 – July 2011
|
||||||||||||
Pound
Sterling
|
3,330,000 | 1.5312 | 5,098,803 | 5,222,178 |
August
2010 – July 2011
|
||||||||||||
Purchase
Contracts:
|
|||||||||||||||||
New
Taiwan Dollar
|
700,000,000 | 31.06 | * | 22,534,733 | 22,091,397 |
August
2010 – July
2011
|
*NT
Dollars per U.S. Dollar
23
Forward
contracts for the sale or purchase of foreign currencies as of July 31, 2010,
which were entered into to protect against the effects of foreign currency
fluctuations on receivables and payables and are not designated as hedges under
this guidance denominated in foreign currencies, were as follows:
Contract Amount at
Forward Rates in
U.S. Dollars
|
|||||||||||||||||
Forward Contracts
|
Notional
Amount in
Foreign
Currency
|
Weighted
Avg.
Forward
Rate
|
Contract
Date
|
July 31,
2010
|
Maturity Dates
|
||||||||||||
Sale
Contracts:
|
|||||||||||||||||
Euro
|
6,391,071 | 1.2636 | 8,075,757 | 8,341,141 |
August
2010 – October 2010
|
||||||||||||
Pound
Sterling
|
420,162 | 1.5611 | 655,913 | 659,444 |
August
2010
|
||||||||||||
Canadian
Dollar
|
564,005 | .9792 | 552,274 | 547,864 |
September
2010
|
||||||||||||
Singapore
Dollar
|
2,047,912 | .7132 | 1,460,510 | 1,506,835 |
March
2011
|
||||||||||||
South
African Rand
|
2,452,988 | .1346 | 330,172 | 331,642 |
October
2010
|
||||||||||||
Purchase
Contracts:
|
|||||||||||||||||
New
Taiwan Dollar
|
239,342,513 | 31.85 | * | 7,514,896 | 7,492,023 |
August
2010 – September
2010
|
* NT
Dollars per U.S. Dollar
We are
also exposed to foreign currency exchange risk related to our investment in net
assets in foreign countries. To manage this risk, we entered
into a forward contract with a notional amount of €3.0 million. We
designated this forward contract as a hedge of our net investment in Euro
denominated assets. We selected the forward method under FASB
guidance related to the accounting for derivatives instruments and hedging
activities. The forward method requires all changes in the fair value of the
forward to be reported as a cumulative translation adjustment in Accumulated
other comprehensive loss, net of tax, in the same manner as the underlying
hedged net assets. This forward contract matured on November 24, 2009
and we entered into a new forward contract for the same notional amount that is
set to mature in November 2010. At July 31, 2010, we had $23,000 of
realized losses and $343,000 of unrealized gains, net of tax, recorded as
cumulative translation adjustments in Accumulated other comprehensive loss
related to this forward contract.
Forward
contracts for the sale or purchase of foreign currencies as of July 31, 2010,
which are designated as net investment hedges under this guidance were as
follows:
Notional
Amount
|
Weighted
Avg.
|
Contract Amount at
Forward Rates in
U.S. Dollars
|
|||||||||||||||
Forward Contracts
|
in Foreign
Currency
|
Forward
Rate
|
Contract
Date
|
July 31,
2010
|
Maturity Date
|
||||||||||||
Sale
Contracts:
|
|||||||||||||||||
Euro
|
3,000,000 | 1.4896 | 4,468,800 | 3,914,670 |
November
2010
|
24
Item
4. CONTROLS AND
PROCEDURES
We
carried out an evaluation under the supervision and with participation of
management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer,
of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and
procedures as of July 31, 2010, pursuant to Rule 13a-15(b) under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Based upon that evaluation, our
management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer,
concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the
evaluation date.
There
were no changes in our internal controls over financial reporting during the
quarter ended July 31, 2010 that materially affected, or are reasonably likely
to materially affect, our internal control over financial
reporting.
25
PART
II - OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. LEGAL
PROCEEDINGS
We are
involved in various claims and lawsuits arising in the normal course of our
business. We believe it is remote that any of these claims will have
a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position or results of
operations.
Item 1A. RISK
FACTORS
There
have been no material changes from the risk factors disclosed in Part I, Item 1A
– Risk Factors in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended October 31,
2009.
Item
5. OTHER
INFORMATION
During
the period covered by this report, the Audit Committee of our Board of Directors
engaged our independent registered public accounting firm to perform non-audit,
tax planning services. This disclosure is made pursuant to Section
10A9(i)(2) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as added by Section 202 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
26
Item
6.
|
EXHIBITS
|
31.1
|
Certification
by the Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to Rule 13a-15(b) under the
Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
|
|
31.2
|
Certification
by the Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to Rule 13a-15(b) under the
Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
|
|
32.1
|
Certification
by the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
32.2
|
Certification
by the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002.
|
27
SIGNATURES
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto
duly authorized.
HURCO
COMPANIES, INC.
|
|
By:
|
/s/ John G. Oblazney
|
John
G. Oblazney
|
|
Vice
President and
|
|
Chief
Financial Officer
|
|
By:
|
/s/ Sonja K. McClelland
|
Sonja
K. McClelland
|
|
Corporate
Controller and
|
|
Principal
Accounting Officer
|
September
3, 2010
28