HUTTIG BUILDING PRODUCTS INC - Quarter Report: 2007 June (Form 10-Q)

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

Form 10-Q

QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2007

Commission file number 1-14982

HUTTIG BUILDING PRODUCTS, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

(314) 216-2600

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer  ¨    Accelerated filer  x    Non-accelerated filer  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes  ¨    No  x

The number of shares of Common Stock outstanding on June 30, 2007 was 20,961,809 shares.

2

HUTTIG BUILDING PRODUCTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(UNAUDITED)

(In Millions, Except Share and Per Share Data)

See notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements

3

HUTTIG BUILDING PRODUCTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(In Millions)

See notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements

4

HUTTIG BUILDING PRODUCTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(In Millions, Except Share and Per Share Data)

See notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements

5

HUTTIG BUILDING PRODUCTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

(UNAUDITED)

(In Millions)

See notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements

6

HUTTIG BUILDING PRODUCTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(UNAUDITED)

(In Millions)

See notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements

7

HUTTIG BUILDING PRODUCTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(UNAUDITED)

The unaudited interim consolidated financial statements of Huttig Building Products, Inc. (the “Company” or “Huttig”) were prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles and reflect all adjustments (including normal recurring accruals) which, in the opinion of management, are considered necessary for the fair presentation of the results for the periods presented. These statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006.

The consolidated results of operations and resulting cash flows for the interim periods presented are not necessarily indicative of the results that might be expected for the full year. Due to the seasonal nature of Huttig’s business, operating profitability is usually lower in the Company’s first and fourth quarters than in the second and third quarters.

Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation.

The Company recognized approximately $0.9 million in non-cash stock-based compensation in both the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006. During the first six months of 2007, the Company granted approximately 241,750 shares of restricted stock and 19,845 restricted stock units, at a combined weighted average fair market value of $6.39, under its 2005 Executive Incentive Compensation Plan and 2005 Non-Employee Director’s Restricted Stock Plan, respectively. The restricted shares vest in three equal installments on the first, second and third anniversaries of the grant date and the restricted stock units vest on the first anniversary of the grant date. The unearned compensation expense is being amortized into expense on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period for the entire award. As of June 30, 2007, the total compensation expense not yet recognized related to all outstanding restricted stock/unit awards and non-vested options was approximately $2.3 million and $0.3 million, respectively.

Debt consisted of the following at June 30, 2007, December 31, 2006 and June 30, 2006 (in millions):

Credit Agreement — On October 20, 2006, the Company entered into a five-year $160.0 million asset based senior secured revolving credit facility (“credit facility”). Borrowing availability under the credit facility is based on eligible accounts receivable and inventory. The Company has the right to add a real estate component to increase borrowing availability, but not in excess of the $160.0 million commitment. Additionally, the credit facility includes an option to request an increase in the size of the facility by up to an additional $40.0 million, subject to certain conditions and approvals. The Company must also pay a fee in the range of 0.25% to 0.32% per annum on the average daily-unused amount of the revolving credit commitment. The entire unpaid balance under the credit facility is due and payable on October 20, 2011, the maturity date of the credit agreement.

At June 30, 2007, under the credit facility the Company had revolving credit borrowings of $42.9 million outstanding at a weighted average interest rate of 6.49%, letters of credit outstanding totaling $5.2 million, primarily for health and workers’ compensation insurance, and $82.1 million of additional borrowing capacity. In addition, the Company had $2.3 million of capital lease and other obligations outstanding at June 30, 2007.

8

The borrowings under the credit facility are collateralized by substantially all of the Company’s assets and are subject to certain operating limitations applicable to a loan of this type, which, among other things, place limitations on indebtedness, liens, investments, mergers and acquisitions, dispositions of assets, cash dividends and transactions with affiliates. The financial covenant in the credit facility is limited to a fixed charge coverage ratio to be tested only when excess borrowing availability is less than $25.0 million and on a pro forma basis prior to consummation of certain significant business transactions outside the Company’s ordinary course of business and prior to increasing the size of the facility.

The Company carries insurance policies on insurable risks with coverage and other terms that it believes to be appropriate. The Company generally has self-insured retention limits and has obtained fully insured layers of coverage above such self-insured retention limits. Accruals for self-insurance losses are made based on claims experience. Liabilities for existing and unreported claims are accrued when it is probable that future costs will be incurred and can be reasonably estimated.

The Company is subject to federal, state and local environmental protection laws and regulations. The Company’s management believes the Company is in compliance, or is taking action aimed at assuring compliance, with applicable environmental protection laws and regulations. However, there can be no assurance that future environmental liabilities will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s consolidated financial condition or results of operations.

Huttig has been identified as a potentially responsible party in connection with the clean up of contamination at a formerly owned property in Montana that was used for the manufacture of wood windows and at a currently-owned facility in Prineville, Oregon, in connection with the clean up of petroleum hydrocarbons and PCP discovered in soil and groundwater at these facilities. As of June 30, 2007, the Company had accrued approximately $0.8 million for future costs of remediating these sites. However, until a final remedy is selected by the respective state departments of environmental quality, management cannot estimate the top of the range of loss or cost to Huttig of the final remediation order.

In addition, some of the Company’s current and former distribution centers are located in areas of current or former industrial activity where environmental contamination may have occurred, and for which the Company, among others, could be held responsible. The Company currently believes that there are no material environmental liabilities at any of its distribution center locations.

The Company accrues expenses for contingencies when it is probable that an asset has been impaired or a liability has been incurred and management can reasonably estimate the expense. Contingencies for which the Company has recorded accruals include environmental, product liability and other legal matters. Based on management’s assessment of the most recent information available, management currently does not expect any of these contingencies to have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position or cash flow. It is possible, however, that future results of operations for any particular quarter or annual period and our financial condition could be materially affected by changes in assumptions or other circumstances related to these matters.

Earnings per share have been calculated using the following share information (in thousands):

9

For the six months ended June 30, 2007, all outstanding stock options and all non-vested restricted shares were anti-dilutive. For the six months ended June 30, 2006 stock options to purchase 300,000 shares were anti-dilutive. For the three months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, stock options to purchase 278,000 and 320,000 shares, respectively, were anti-dilutive. For each period, the stock options and non-vested restricted shares that were anti-dilutive were not included in the computations of diluted income per share amounts.

In 2007, the Company closed its Hauppauge, New York, Dothan, Alabama, and Spokane, Washington branches and sold certain assets of its Green Bay, Wisconsin branch. The Company recorded $2.7 million in net operating charges from branch closures and from severance associated with other reductions in force in the caption “Operating expenses” on its consolidated statement of operations for the six months ended June 30, 2007. The Company also recorded $1.0 million in net inventory losses related to branch closures in the caption “Cost of sales” on its consolidated statement of operations for the six months ended June 30, 2007. At June 30, 2007, the Company has recorded $1.6 million related to accrued severance and remaining building lease rentals (net of anticipated sublease rentals) on closed facilities that will be paid out over the terms of the various leases through 2009 primarily in “Other accrued liabilities” on the balance sheet.

Branch Closure Reserve and Other Accrued Severance: (in millions)

Huttig adopted FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes (“FIN 48”), on January 1, 2007. As a result of the implementation, the Company recognized a $0.4 million decrease to liabilities for uncertain tax positions. This decrease was accounted for as an increase to the beginning balance of retained earnings on the balance sheet. Including the cumulative effect decrease to liabilities for uncertain tax positions, at the beginning of 2007, Huttig had approximately $0.4 million of unrecognized tax benefits, all of which, if recognized, would affect the effective income tax rate in any future periods.

In connection with the adoption of FIN 48, the Company will include interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions in income tax expense. Currently, the Company has $0.4 million of unrecognized tax benefits and $0.2 million of accrued interest related to uncertain tax positions included in “Other non-current liabilities” on the balance sheet.

Huttig and its subsidiaries are subject to U.S. federal income tax as well as income tax of multiple state jurisdictions. The Company has substantially concluded all U.S. federal income tax matters for years through 2002 and for 2004, and is currently not under examination by the Internal Revenue Service. Open tax years related to state jurisdictions remain subject to examination but are not considered material.

As of June 30, 2007, there have been no material changes to the liabilities for uncertain tax positions. The Company does not expect any significant increases or decreases to its unrecognized tax benefits within 12 months of this reporting date.

The Company recorded a net $0.2 million after tax loss from discontinued operations primarily for environmental and litigation expenses associated with previously reported discontinued operations in the six months ended June 30, 2007.

10

ITEM 2 — MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Overview

Huttig is a distributor of building materials used principally in new residential construction and in home improvement, remodeling, and repair work. We distribute our products through 38 distribution centers serving 44 states and sell primarily to building materials dealers, national buying groups, home centers and industrial users, including makers of manufactured homes.

The following table sets forth our sales from continuing operations, by product classification as a percentage of total sales:

Industry Conditions

Various factors historically have caused our results of operations to fluctuate from period to period. These factors include levels of construction, home improvement and remodeling activity, weather, prices of commodity wood, steel and petroleum-based products, fuel costs, interest rates, competitive pressures, availability of credit and other local, regional and national economic conditions. Many of these factors are cyclical or seasonal in nature. We anticipate that fluctuations from period to period will continue in the future. Our first quarter and fourth quarter are generally adversely affected by winter weather patterns in the Midwest and Northeast, which typically result in seasonal decreases in levels of construction activity in these areas. Because much of our overhead and expenses remain relatively fixed throughout the year, our operating profits tend to be lower during the first and fourth quarters.

We believe we have the product offerings, warehouse and support facilities, personnel, systems infrastructure and financial and competitive resources necessary for continued business success. Our future revenues, costs and profitability, however, are all likely to be influenced by a number of risks and uncertainties, including those discussed under “Cautionary Statement” below.

Critical Accounting Policies

We prepare our consolidated financial statements in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, which require management to make estimates and assumptions. Management bases these estimates and assumptions on historical results and known trends as well as management forecasts. Actual results could differ from these estimates and assumptions. See our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 in Part II, Item 7—“Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations-Critical Accounting Policies.”

11

Results of Operations

Three Months Ended June 30, 2007 Compared to the Three Months Ended June 30, 2006

Net sales from continuing operations were $239.5 million, which were $55.8 million, or approximately 19%, lower than 2006. Second quarter 2007 results reflect a drop in housing starts to an average annualized rate of approximately 1.5 million compared to approximately 1.9 million in the second quarter of 2006. We continue to anticipate decreased housing starts in 2007 versus 2006 based on the current level of housing activity and industry forecasts for 2007.

By product, sales decreased in the millwork, general building products and wood products categories. Millwork sales decreased 25% to $117.4 million. General building products sales decreased 7% to $88.7 million. Other wood products, mostly commodity products, decreased 28% to $23.1 million and engineered wood sales were down 24% to $10.3 million.

Gross margin decreased 19% to $45.7 million, or 19.1% of sales, as compared to $56.4 million or 19.0% of sales in the prior year period. As compared to the prior year second quarter, gross margin as a percentage of sales benefited from a more favorable mix of higher margin non-direct sales, which was partially offset by higher customer rebates and a less favorable product mix of millwork sales.

Operating expenses decreased 12% to $43.8 million, or 18.3% of sales, in the 2007 second quarter, compared to $49.7 million, or 16.8% of sales, in the 2006 second quarter. Operating expenses in the 2007 second quarter reflect decreased personnel costs of $3.8 million compared to the 2006 second quarter primarily due to lower employee headcount partially offset by increased medical benefit costs. Non-personnel expenses decreased $2.1 million in the 2007 second quarter, as compared to the 2006 second quarter, due primarily to lower infrastructure levels following our restructuring actions.

In the 2007 second quarter, we incurred net charges of $0.1 million in gross margin and $0.3 million in operating expenses, primarily related to inventory liquidations and other shutdown expenses associated with our previously announced branch closures and the sale of certain assets of our distribution business in Green Bay, Wisconsin. In addition, we recognized a gain of $1.0 million on the sale of our Spokane, Washington facility.

Net interest expense decreased to $1.2 million in the second quarter from $1.3 million in the prior year second quarter primarily from decreased borrowing levels partially offset by higher interest rates.

Income taxes as a percentage of pre-tax income for the three months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006 were approximately 35% and 38%, respectively.

As a result of the foregoing factors, the operating profit from continuing operations was $2.9 million in the 2007 second quarter as compared to an operating profit of $6.7 million from continuing operations in 2006 second quarter. Net income from continuing operations was $1.1 million, or $0.05 per diluted share, in the 2007 second quarter, as compared to net income from continuing operations of $3.3 million, or $0.16 per diluted share, in the 2006 second quarter.

Six Months Ended June 30, 2007 Compared to the Six Months Ended June 30, 2006

Net sales from continuing operations were $461.9 million, which were $115.5 million, or approximately 20%, lower than 2006. The results for the six months ended June 30, 2007 reflect a drop in housing starts to an average annualized rate of approximately 1.5 million compared to approximately 2.0 million in the first six months of 2006. As indicated above, we continue to anticipate decreased housing starts in 2007 versus 2006 based on the current level of housing activity and industry forecasts for 2007.

By product, sales decreased in the millwork, general building products and wood products categories. Millwork sales decreased 24% to $232.7 million. General building products sales decreased 9% to $165.8 million. Other wood products, mostly commodity products, decreased 29% to $44.3 million and engineered wood sales were down 24% to $19.1 million.

Gross margin decreased 21% to $87.5 million, or 18.9% of sales, as compared to $111.1 million or 19.2% of sales in the prior year period. The six months ended June 30, 2007 results reflect the liquidation and write-down of inventory at closed branches of $1.0 million. These items impacted gross margin percentage by approximately 0.2%. Also as compared to the prior year, gross margin as a percentage of sales benefited from a more favorable mix of higher margin non-direct sales, which was partially offset by a decrease in vendor rebates earned and a less favorable product mix of millwork sales.

Operating expenses decreased 10% to $89.9 million, or 19.5% of sales, in the six months ended June 30, 2007, compared to $99.5 million, or 17.2% of sales, in the first six months of 2006. Operating expenses in the 2007 period include $2.7 million

12

of expenses, primarily severance, lease termination and asset impairment, associated with the shut down and consolidation of three branches during 2007. Excluding the branch shut down and branch consolidation expenses, operating expenses in the first six months of 2007 reflect decreased personnel costs of $8.0 million compared to the 2006 period primarily due to lower employee headcount partially offset by higher medical benefit costs. In addition, excluding the branch shut down and branch consolidation expenses, non-personnel expenses decreased $4.3 million in the first six months of 2007, as compared to the 2006 first six months, due primarily to lower infrastructure levels following our restructure activities.

In the six months ended June 30, 2007, we recognized gains of $0.5 million on the sale of our Grand Rapids, MI facility and $1.0 million on the sale of our Spokane, WA facility.

Net interest expense was $2.3 million in both the first six months of 2007 and 2006 with lower debt levels being offset by increased interest rates.

Income taxes as a percentage of pre-tax income (loss) for the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006 were approximately 34% and 38%, respectively.

As a result of the foregoing factors, the operating loss from continuing operations was ($0.9) million in the first six months of 2007 as compared to an operating profit of $11.6 million from continuing operations in first six months of 2006. Net loss from continuing operations was ($2.1) million, or ($0.10) per diluted share, in the first six months of 2007, as compared to net income of $5.7 million from continuing operations, or $0.28 per diluted share, in the first six months of 2006.

Discontinued Operations

We recorded a net $0.2 million after-tax loss from discontinued operations primarily for environmental and litigation expenses associated with previously reported discontinued operations in the six months ended June 30, 2007.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

We depend on cash flow from operations and funds available under our revolving credit facility to finance seasonal working capital needs, capital expenditures and any acquisitions that we may undertake. Our working capital requirements are generally greatest in the second and third quarters, which reflect the seasonal nature of our business. The second and third quarters are also typically our strongest operating quarters, largely due to more favorable weather throughout many of our markets compared to the first and fourth quarters. We typically generate cash from working capital reductions in the fourth quarter of the year and build working capital during the first quarter in preparation for our second and third quarters. We also maintain significant inventories to meet rapid delivery requirements of our customers and to enable us to obtain favorable pricing, delivery and service terms with our suppliers. At June 30, 2007, December 31, 2006 and June 30, 2006, inventories constituted approximately 39%, 39% and 41% of our total assets, respectively. We also closely monitor operating expenses and inventory levels during seasonally affected periods and, to the extent possible, manage variable operating costs to minimize seasonal effects on our profitability.

Operations. Cash used in operating activities decreased $31.1 million to $0.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2007 from $31.5 million for the first six months of 2006. Accounts receivable increased by $15.4 million in the first six months of 2007 compared to an increase of $22.3 million in the first six months of 2006. Days sales outstanding decreased to 34.1 days at June 30, 2007 compared to 34.6 days at June 30, 2006 based on annualized sales for the respective immediately preceding quarter. Inventory increased by $4.8 million in the 2007 first six months compared to an increase of $34.7 million in the 2006 first six months. Annualized inventory turns, calculated as the ratio of annualized cost of goods sold for each three-month period ended June 30 divided by the average of the beginning and ending inventory balances for each such three-month period, were 7.5 turns at both June 30, 2007 and June 30, 2006. Accounts payable increased by $18.5 million and $15.1 million in the six-month periods ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively.

Investing. In the six-month period ended June 30, 2007, net cash provided from investing activities was $0.9 million, as compared to $6.3 million of net cash used in investing activities in the six-month period ended June 30, 2006. The Company received proceeds of $2.9 million as a result of our sales of the Spokane, WA and Grand Rapids, MI facilities. In addition, the six months ended June 30, 2007 reflect cash used in investing activities of $2.0 million related to capital expenditures primarily to purchase computer software necessary to upgrade our enterprise resource planning system and to purchase machinery and equipment at multiple branch locations compared to $6.4 million in capital expenditures in the first six months of 2006.

Financing. Cash provided from financing activities for the first six months of 2007 primarily reflects $0.9 million received from the exercise of employee stock options partially offset by a $0.4 million decrease in net borrowings. Cash provided from financing activities for the first six months of 2006 primarily reflects a $36.9 million increase in net borrowings and $1.0 million received from the exercise of employee stock options.

13

Credit Agreement — On October 20, 2006, we entered into a five-year $160.0 million asset based senior secured revolving credit facility (“credit facility”). Borrowing availability under the credit facility is based on eligible accounts receivable and inventory. We have the right to add a real estate component to increase borrowing availability, but not in excess of the $160.0 million commitment. Additionally, the credit facility includes an option to request an increase in the size of the facility by up to an additional $40.0 million, subject to certain conditions and approvals. We must also pay a fee in the range of 0.25% to 0.32% per annum on the average daily-unused amount of the revolving credit commitment. The entire unpaid balance under the credit facility is due and payable on October 20, 2011, the maturity date of the credit agreement.

At June 30, 2007, under the credit facility, we had revolving credit borrowings of $42.9 million outstanding at a weighted average interest rate of 6.49%, letters of credit outstanding totaling $5.2 million, primarily for health and workers’ compensation insurance, and $82.1 million of additional borrowing capacity. In addition, we had $2.3 million of capital lease and other obligations outstanding at June 30, 2007.

The borrowings under the credit facility are collateralized by substantially all of our assets and are subject to certain operating limitations applicable to a loan of this type, which, among other things, place limitations on indebtedness, liens, investments, mergers and acquisitions, dispositions of assets, cash dividends and transactions with affiliates. The financial covenant in the credit facility is limited to a fixed charge coverage ratio to be tested only when excess borrowing availability is less than $25.0 million and on a pro forma basis prior to consummation of certain significant business transactions outside our ordinary course of business and prior to increasing the size of the facility.

We believe that cash generated from our operations and funds available under our credit facility will provide sufficient funds to meet our currently anticipated short-term and long-term liquidity and capital expenditure requirements.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

In addition to funds available from operating cash flows, and bank credit agreements as described above, we use operating leases as a principal off-balance sheet financing technique. Operating leases are employed as an alternative to purchasing certain property, plant and equipment. See our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 in Part II, Item 7—“Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations-Commitments and Contingencies.”

Contingencies

We carry insurance policies on insurable risks with coverage and other terms that we believe to be appropriate. We generally have self-insured retention limits and have obtained fully insured layers of coverage above such self-insured retention limits. Accruals for self-insurance losses are made based on claims experience. Liabilities for existing and unreported claims are accrued when it is probable that future costs will be incurred and can be reasonably estimated.

We are subject to federal, state and local environmental protection laws and regulations. Our management believes we are in compliance, or are taking action aimed at assuring compliance, with applicable environmental protection laws and regulations. However, there can be no assurance that future environmental liabilities will not have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial condition or results of operations.

We have been identified as a potentially responsible party in connection with the clean up of contamination at a formerly owned property in Montana that was used for the manufacture of wood windows and at a currently-owned facility in Prineville, Oregon, in connection with the clean up of petroleum hydrocarbons and PCP discovered in soil and groundwater at these facilities. As of June 30, 2007, we have accrued approximately $0.8 million for future costs of remediating these sites. However, until a final remedy is selected by the respective state departments of environmental quality, management cannot estimate the top of the range of loss or cost to us of the final remediation order.

In addition, some of our current and former distribution centers are located in areas of current or former industrial activity where environmental contamination may have occurred, and for which we, among others, could be held responsible. We currently believe that there are no material environmental liabilities at any of our distribution center locations.

We accrue expenses for contingencies when it is probable that an asset has been impaired or a liability has been incurred and management can reasonably estimate the expense. Contingencies for which we have made accruals include environmental, product liability and other legal matters. Based on management’s assessment of the most recent information available,

14

management currently does not expect any of these contingencies to have a material adverse effect on our financial position or cash flow. It is possible, however, that future results of operations for any particular quarter or annual period and our financial condition could be materially affected by changes in assumptions or other circumstances related to these matters.

New Accounting Procurements

In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities – Including an amendment of FASB Statement No. 115,” which permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value. SFAS No. 159 is effective as of the beginning of an entity’s first fiscal year that begins after November 15, 2007. We are currently evaluating if we will elect the fair value option for any of our eligible financial instruments and other items.

Cautionary Statement

Certain statements in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contain “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, including but not limited to statements regarding:

The words or phrases “will likely result,” “are expected to,” “will continue,” “is anticipated,” “estimate,” “project” or similar expressions identify “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.

These statements present management’s expectations, beliefs, plans and objectives regarding our future business and financial performance. These forward-looking statements are based on current projections, estimates, assumptions and judgments, and involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties. There are a number of factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied in the forward-looking statements. These factors include, but are not limited to, the following:

15

Additional information concerning these and other factors that could materially affect our results of operations and financial condition are included in our most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K. We disclaim any obligation to publicly update or revise any of these forward-looking statements.

16

ITEM 3 — QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

We have exposure to market risk as it relates to effects of changes in interest rates. We had debt outstanding at June 30, 2007 under our credit facility of $42.9 million.

All of our debt under our revolving credit facility accrues interest at a floating rate basis. If market interest rates for LIBOR had been different by an average of 1% for the six months ended June 30, 2007, our interest expense and income before taxes would have changed by $0.3 million. These amounts are determined by considering the impact of the hypothetical interest rates on our borrowing cost. This analysis does not consider the effects of any change in the overall economic activity that could exist in such an environment. Further, in the event of a change of such magnitude, management may take actions to further mitigate its exposure to the change. However, due to the uncertainty of the specific actions that would be taken and their possible effects, the sensitivity analysis assumes no changes in our financial structure.

We are subject to periodic fluctuations in the price of wood, steel commodities, petrochemical-based products and fuel. Profitability is influenced by these changes as prices change between the time we buy and sell the wood, steel or petrochemical-based products. Profitability is influenced by changes in prices in fuel. In addition, to the extent changes in interest rates affect the housing and remodeling market, we would be affected by such changes.

ITEM 4 – CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures – The Company, under the supervision and with the participation of our Disclosure Committee and management, including our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934). Based upon that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective as of June 30, 2007 in all material respects in (a) causing information required to be disclosed by us in reports that we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 to be recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms and (b) causing such information to be accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Changes in Internal Control of Financial Reporting – There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended June 30, 2007, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

17

PART II – OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1 — LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

See Note 4 – Contingencies of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 1 for information on legal proceedings in which the Company is involved. See also Part I, Item 3-“Legal Proceedings” in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006.

ITEM 4 — SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

We held our Annual Meeting of Shareholders on April 23, 2007. At the Annual Meeting, shareholders elected the following directors for terms of office expiring in 2010.

Pursuant to the terms of the Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting, proxies received were voted, unless authority was withheld, in favor of the election of the four directors named above.

After the Annual Meeting, the term of office as director of the Company of each of the following directors continued: R.S. Evans, J. Keith Matheney, Steven A. Wise, Dorsey R. Gardner, Philippe J. Gastone, Michael A. Lupo, and Delbert H. Tanner.

A proposal to approve the adoption of an amendment and restatement of our 2005 Executive Equity Incentive Plan to increase the number of shares of common stock reserved for issuance by 750,000 shares was approved, receiving 12,633,237 votes FOR and 2,056,355 votes AGAINST, with 87,556 ABSTENTIONS.

A proposal to ratify the appointment of KPMG LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2007 was approved, receiving 16,882,073 votes FOR and 105,472 votes AGAINST, with 57,693 ABSTENTIONS.

ITEM 6 — EXHIBITS

18

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

19

EXHIBIT INDEX

20