ICAD INC - Quarter Report: 2008 September (Form 10-Q)
UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON,
D.C. 20549
FORM
10-Q
(Mark
One)
x |
QUARTERLY
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF
1934
|
For
the
quarterly period ended September
30, 2008
OR
o |
TRANSITION
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF
1934
|
For
the
transition period from
to
________________
Commission
file number 1-9341
iCAD,
Inc.
(Exact
name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware
|
02-0377419
|
|
(State
or other jurisdiction
of
incorporation or organization)
|
(I.R.S.
Employer Identification No.)
|
98
Spit Brook Road, Suite 100, Nashua, NH
|
03062
|
|
(Address
of principal executive offices)
|
(Zip
Code)
|
(603)
882-5200
(Registrant's
telephone number, including area code)
Not
Applicable
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to
be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required
to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirement
for
the past 90 days. YES x
NO
¨.
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.
See
the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller
reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large
Accelerated filer ¨
|
Accelerated
filer x
|
Non-accelerated
filer ¨
|
Smaller
reporting company ¨
|
(do
not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act) YES ¨
NO
x.
As
of the
close of business on October 30, 2008 there were 45,343,508 shares outstanding
of the registrant 's Common Stock, $.01 par value.
iCAD,
INC.
INDEX
PAGE
|
|||
PART
I
|
FINANCIAL
INFORMATION
|
||
Item
1
|
Financial
Statements (unaudited)
|
||
Consolidated
Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2008 and December 31,
2007
|
4
|
||
Consolidated
Statements of Operations for the three and nine month periods ended
September 30, 2008 and 2007
|
5
|
||
Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows for the nine month periods ended September
30,
2008 and 2007
|
6
|
||
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements
|
7-15
|
||
Item
2
|
Management's
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
|
16-23
|
|
Item
3
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
|
24
|
|
Item
4
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
24
|
|
PART
II
|
OTHER
INFORMATION
|
||
Item
2
|
Unregistered
Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
|
25
|
|
Item
6
|
Exhibits
|
25
|
|
Signatures |
26
|
3
iCAD,
INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
Consolidated
Balance Sheets
(unaudited)
|
September 30,
|
December 31,
|
|||||
2008
|
2007
|
||||||
Assets (Note 2)
|
|||||||
Current
assets:
|
|||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
$
|
11,049,682
|
$
|
4,348,729
|
|||
Trade
accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful
|
|||||||
accounts
of $50,000 in 2008 and 2007
|
6,016,104
|
6,483,618
|
|||||
Inventory,
net
|
1,813,523
|
1,798,243
|
|||||
Prepaid
and other current assets
|
559,679
|
320,169
|
|||||
Total
current assets
|
19,438,988
|
12,950,759
|
|||||
Property
and equipment:
|
|||||||
Equipment
|
3,763,567
|
3,512,557
|
|||||
Leasehold
improvements
|
75,590
|
71,611
|
|||||
Furniture
and fixtures
|
356,497
|
330,077
|
|||||
Marketing
assets
|
234,140
|
323,873
|
|||||
4,429,794
|
4,238,118
|
||||||
Less
accumulated depreciation and amortization
|
2,761,510
|
2,369,590
|
|||||
Net
property and equipment
|
1,668,284
|
1,868,528
|
|||||
Other
assets:
|
|||||||
Deposits
|
63,194
|
63,194
|
|||||
Patents,
net of accumulated amortization
|
21,977
|
68,269
|
|||||
Customer
relationships, net of accumuated amortization
|
242,833
|
-
|
|||||
Technology
intangibles, net of accumulated amortization
|
7,401,480
|
3,115,843
|
|||||
Tradename,
net of accumulated amortization
|
130,200
|
148,800
|
|||||
Goodwill
|
43,515,285
|
43,515,285
|
|||||
Total
other assets
|
51,374,969
|
46,911,391
|
|||||
Total
assets
|
$
|
72,482,241
|
$
|
61,730,678
|
|||
Liabilities
and Stockholders' Equity
|
|||||||
Current
liabilities:
|
|||||||
Accounts
payable
|
$
|
1,809,829
|
$
|
2,010,717
|
|||
Accrued
salaries and other expenses
|
3,079,179
|
3,461,422
|
|||||
Deferred
revenue
|
2,129,772
|
1,674,005
|
|||||
Convertible
loans payable to related parties
|
-
|
2,793,382
|
|||||
Convertible
loans payable to non-related parties
|
-
|
684,559
|
|||||
Total
current liabilities
|
7,018,780
|
10,624,085
|
|||||
Convertible
revolving loans payable to related party
|
-
|
2,258,906
|
|||||
Total
liabilities
|
7,018,780
|
12,882,991
|
|||||
Commitments
and contingencies
|
|||||||
Stockholders'
equity:
|
|||||||
Common
stock, $ .01 par value: authorized 85,000,000 shares; issued 45,411,384
in
2008 and 39,239,208 in 2007; outstanding 45,343,508 in 2008 and 39,171,332
in 2007
|
454,113
|
392,392
|
|||||
Additional
paid-in capital
|
147,574,151
|
135,055,418
|
|||||
Accumulated
deficit
|
(81,614,539
|
)
|
(85,649,859
|
)
|
|||
Treasury
stock at cost (67,876 shares)
|
(950,264
|
)
|
(950,264
|
)
|
|||
Total
Stockholders' equity
|
65,463,461
|
48,847,687
|
|||||
Total
liabilities and stockholders' equity
|
$
|
72,482,241
|
$
|
61,730,678
|
See
accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
4
iCAD,
Inc.
Consolidated
Statements of Operations
(unaudited)
Three Months
|
Nine Months
|
||||||||||||
September 30,
|
September 30,
|
||||||||||||
2008
|
2007
|
2008
|
2007
|
||||||||||
Revenue
|
|||||||||||||
Products
|
$
|
10,322,512
|
$
|
5,458,776
|
$
|
25,654,259
|
$
|
15,993,182
|
|||||
Service
and supplies
|
871,119
|
800,765
|
2,520,877
|
2,518,581
|
|||||||||
Total
revenue
|
11,193,631
|
6,259,541
|
28,175,136
|
18,511,763
|
|||||||||
Cost
of revenue
|
|||||||||||||
Products
|
1,588,501
|
1,010,884
|
4,014,143
|
2,962,174
|
|||||||||
Service
and supplies
|
193,451
|
237,121
|
639,834
|
712,652
|
|||||||||
Total
cost of revenue
|
1,781,952
|
1,248,005
|
4,653,977
|
3,674,826
|
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Gross
margin
|
9,411,679
|
5,011,536
|
23,521,159
|
14,836,937
|
|||||||||
Operating
expenses:
|
|||||||||||||
Engineering
and product development
|
1,905,841
|
1,129,345
|
4,818,645
|
3,327,644
|
|||||||||
Marketing
and sales
|
3,340,072
|
2,620,827
|
8,533,061
|
7,923,032
|
|||||||||
General
and administrative
|
1,942,582
|
1,816,657
|
5,726,819
|
5,319,963
|
|||||||||
Total
operating expenses
|
7,188,495
|
5,566,829
|
19,078,525
|
16,570,639
|
|||||||||
Income
(loss) from operations
|
2,223,184
|
(555,293
|
)
|
4,442,634
|
(1,733,702
|
)
|
|||||||
Interest
expense - net
|
27,610
|
114,752
|
210,314
|
329,891
|
|||||||||
Net
income (loss) before provision for income taxes
|
$
|
2,195,574
|
$
|
(670,045
|
)
|
$
|
4,232,320
|
$
|
(2,063,593
|
)
|
|||
Provision
for income taxes
|
101,000
|
-
|
197,000
|
-
|
|||||||||
Net
income (loss)
|
2,094,574
|
(670,045
|
)
|
4,035,320
|
(2,063,593
|
)
|
|||||||
Preferred
dividend
|
-
|
11,880
|
-
|
67,760
|
|||||||||
Net
income (loss) attributable to common stockholders
|
$
|
2,094,574
|
$
|
(681,925
|
)
|
$
|
4,035,320
|
$
|
(2,131,353
|
)
|
|||
Net
income (loss) per share
|
|||||||||||||
Basic
|
$
|
0.05
|
$
|
(0.02
|
)
|
$
|
0.10
|
$
|
(0.06
|
)
|
|||
Diluted
|
$
|
0.04
|
$
|
(0.02
|
)
|
$
|
0.09
|
$
|
(0.06
|
)
|
|||
Weighted
average number of shares used
|
|||||||||||||
in
computing income (loss) per share
|
|||||||||||||
Basic
|
42,953,932
|
38,707,772
|
40,487,297
|
38,076,299
|
|||||||||
Diluted
|
46,578,716
|
38,707,772
|
45,241,275
|
38,076,299
|
See
accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
5
iCAD,
Inc.
Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows
(unaudited)
Nine Months
|
Nine Months
|
||||||
September 30, 2008
|
September 30, 2007
|
||||||
Cash
flows from operating activities:
|
|||||||
Net
Income (loss)
|
$
|
4,035,320
|
$
|
(2,063,593
|
)
|
||
Adjustments
to reconcile net income (loss)
|
|||||||
to
net cash provided by (used for) operating activities:
|
|||||||
Depreciation
|
677,170
|
740,871
|
|||||
Amortization
|
640,689
|
539,255
|
|||||
Loss
on disposal of assets
|
20,982
|
17,680
|
|||||
Stock
based compensation
|
1,354,635
|
855,533
|
|||||
Non-cash
interest expense associated with discount
|
|||||||
on
convertible loans payable
|
22,059
|
22,059
|
|||||
Changes
in operating assets and liabilities:
|
|||||||
Accounts
receivable
|
584,514
|
(436,804
|
)
|
||||
Inventory
|
(15,280
|
)
|
1,199,446
|
||||
Prepaid
and other current assets
|
(239,510
|
)
|
(145,978
|
)
|
|||
Accounts
payable
|
(368,336
|
)
|
(1,215,468
|
)
|
|||
Accrued
interest
|
181,082
|
341,189
|
|||||
Accrued
salaries and other expenses
|
276,079
|
(198,016
|
)
|
||||
Deferred
revenue
|
455,767
|
171,650
|
|||||
Total
adjustments
|
3,589,851
|
1,891,417
|
|||||
Net
cash provided by (used for) operating activities
|
7,625,171
|
(172,176
|
)
|
||||
Cash
flows from investing activities:
|
|||||||
Additions
to property and equipment
|
(534,214
|
)
|
(449,682
|
)
|
|||
Acquisition
of CAD Sciences
|
(2,000,000
|
)
|
-
|
||||
Net
cash used for investing activities
|
(2,534,214
|
)
|
(449,682
|
)
|
|||
Cash
flows from financing activities:
|
|||||||
Issuance
of common stock for cash
|
1,868,902
|
1,231,327
|
|||||
Payment
of convertible notes payable
|
(258,906
|
)
|
-
|
||||
Payment
of note payable
|
-
|
(375,000
|
)
|
||||
Net
cash provided by financing activities
|
1,609,996
|
856,327
|
|||||
Increase
in cash and equivalents
|
6,700,953
|
234,469
|
|||||
Cash
and equivalents, beginning of period
|
4,348,729
|
3,623,404
|
|||||
Cash
and equivalents, end of period
|
$
|
11,049,682
|
$
|
3,857,873
|
|||
Supplemental
disclosure of cash flow information:
|
|||||||
Interest
paid
|
$
|
55,598
|
$
|
8,743
|
|||
Non-cash
items from investing and financing activities:
|
|||||||
Fair
market value of iCAD common stock issued to acquire
|
|||||||
assets
of CAD Sciences
|
$
|
3,000,000
|
$
|
-
|
|||
Conversion
of convertible notes payable and related accrued
|
|||||||
interest
into Common Stock
|
$
|
6,356,917
|
$
|
-
|
|||
Accrued
dividends on convertible preferred stock
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
67,760
|
See
accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
6
iCAD,
INC.
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
September
30, 2008
(1) |
Basis
of Presentation and Significant Accounting
Policies
|
Reference
should be made to iCAD, Inc.'s (“iCAD”, “Company”, “we”, “our” or “us”) Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 for a comprehensive
summary of significant accounting policies.
The
accompanying consolidated financial statements of the Company have been prepared
in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States
of America. In the opinion of management, these unaudited interim consolidated
financial statements reflect all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring
adjustments, necessary for a fair presentation of the financial position at
September 30, 2008, the results of operations for the three and nine month
periods ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, and cash flows for the nine month
periods ended September 30, 2008 and 2007. Although the Company believes that
the disclosures in these financial statements are adequate to make the
information presented not misleading, certain information normally included
in
the footnotes prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles in the United States of America has been omitted as permitted by
the
rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. The
accompanying financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited
financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report
on Form 10−K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on March 17, 2008. The results for the three
and nine month periods ended September 30, 2008 are not necessarily indicative
of the results that may be expected for the fiscal year ending December 31,
2008, or any future period. Interim period amounts are not necessarily
indicative of the results of operations for the full fiscal year.
(2) |
Financing
Arrangements
|
Loan
and Security Agreement
On
June
30, 2008, the Company entered into a Loan and Security Agreement (the “RBS Loan
Agreement”) with RBS Citizens, N.A. (“RBS”). The Loan Agreement replaces the
prior Revolving Loan and Security Agreement with Mr. Robert Howard, the
Company’s former Chairman of the Board of Directors. The RBS Loan Agreement
established a secured revolving credit facility with a line of credit of up
to
$5,000,000. The borrowing base under the RBS Loan Agreement is limited to 80%
of
eligible accounts receivable or, if adjusted EBITDA (EBITDA is defined in the
agreement as earnings before interest expense, income tax expense, depreciation,
amortization and SFAS 123R stock option expense) for the quarter is greater
than
or equal to $1,250,000, then the Company shall not be subject to a restriction
as to availability of credit upon the borrowing base.
7
iCAD,
INC.
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
September
30, 2008
(2) |
Financing
Arrangements (continued)
|
Loan
and Security Agreement (continued)
In
this
event, the Company shall be subject to compliance with a Total Funded Debt
to
Adjusted EBITDA covenant. As of September 30, 2008, the Company had
approximately $5,000,000 of available borrowing capacity. Unless earlier repaid,
all amounts due and owing under the RBS Loan Agreement are required to be repaid
on June 30, 2009, the stated termination date of the RBS Loan Agreement.
The
RBS
Loan Agreement contains certain financial and non-financial covenants relating
to the Company. The RBS Loan Agreement also contains certain events of default.
Amounts due under the RBS Loan Agreement and the related Revolving Note (the
“Revolving Note”) dated June 30, 2008, may be prepaid at any time, in whole or
in part, at the option of the Company, provided, however, that for any portion
of the loan accruing interest as a “LIBOR Rate Loan” (as defined in the RBS Loan
Agreement), the Company is responsible to pay any LIBOR Breakage Fee as defined
and further described in the Revolving Note. All amounts outstanding under
the
RBS Loan Agreement and the associated Revolving Note will bear interest, at
the
Company’s option, at a fluctuating per annum rate of interest equal to (i) Prime
Rate (as defined in the Revolving Note) plus one-half of one percent or (ii)
the
Adjusted LIBOR Rate (as defined in the Revolving Note) plus the LIBOR Rate
Margin (as defined in the Revolving Note).
In
connection with the RBS Loan Agreement and the Revolving Note, the Company
has
entered into a Negative Pledge Agreement dated June 30, 2008. Pursuant to the
Negative Pledge Agreement, the Company agreed, among other things, (i) not
to
incur any liens, other than as permitted under the RBS Loan Agreement, with
respect to the Company’s intellectual property and (ii) not to sell or assign,
other than for fair consideration in the ordinary course of business, the
Company’s intellectual property. In addition, the Company assigned all its
assets to RBS wherever located and whether now owned or hereafter acquired,
including, without limitation, all inventory, machinery, equipment, fixtures
and
other goods.
Convertible
Revolving Loan Payable to Related Party
The
Company had a Revolving Loan and Security Agreement (the "Prior Loan Agreement")
with Mr. Robert Howard, the former Chairman of the Board of Directors of the
Company, under which Mr. Howard had agreed to advance funds, or to provide
guarantees of advances made by third parties in an amount up to $5,000,000.
As a
condition to, and simultaneously with, the execution of the RBS Loan Agreement,
on June
8
iCAD,
INC.
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
September
30, 2008
(2) |
Financing
Arrangements (continued)
|
Convertible
Revolving Loan Payable to Related Party (continued)
30,
2008,
the unpaid principal amount and accrued interest of the Prior Loan Agreement,
was extinguished as follows: (1) a total of $2,000,000 principal amount under
the Prior Loan Agreement, together with $351,917 of accrued and unpaid interest
on such principal amount, was converted by Mr. Howard into 1,622,012 shares
of
the Company’s common stock at $1.45 per share and (2) the remaining principal
balance under the Prior Loan Agreement of $258,906, together with accrued and
unpaid interest of $55,598 on such principal amount, was paid in cash to Mr.
Howard. The outstanding indebtedness under the Prior Loan Agreement has
therefore, been fully repaid and satisfied and the Prior Loan Agreement was
terminated as of June 30, 2008.
Convertible
Loans Payable to Related Parties
On
June
19, 2006, the Company and Dr. Lawrence Howard, who subsequently became a
director and is currently the Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Company,
entered into a Note Purchase Agreement with respect to the purchase by Dr.
Howard from the Company of an aggregate of $200,000 principal amount of a 7%
Convertible Note of the Company due June 19, 2008 (the “Howard Note”) at a
purchase price of $200,000. Interest on the Howard Note was payable on the
due
date. On June 19, 2008, the $200,000 principal amount under the Howard Note,
together with $28,000 of accrued and unpaid interest on such principal amount,
was converted by Dr. Howard into 152,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at
$1.50 per share conversion price as set forth in the Howard Note. The Howard
Note has, therefore, been fully repaid and satisfied and was terminated as
of
June 19, 2008.
On
June
20, 2006, the Company and Mr. Kenneth Ferry, the Company’s Chief Executive
Officer, entered into a Note Purchase Agreement with respect to the purchase
by
Mr. Ferry from the Company of an aggregate of $300,000 principal amount of
a 7%
Convertible Note of the Company due June 20, 2008 (the “Ferry Note”) at a
purchase price of $300,000. Interest on the Ferry Note was payable on the due
date. On June 20, 2008, the $300,000 principal amount under the Ferry Note,
together with $42,000 of accrued and unpaid interest on such principal amount,
was converted by Mr. Ferry into 228,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at
$1.50 per share conversion price as set forth in the Ferry Note. The Ferry
Note
has, therefore, been fully repaid and satisfied and was terminated as of June
20, 2008.
9
iCAD,
INC.
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
September
30, 2008
(2) |
Financing
Arrangements (continued)
|
Convertible
Loans Payable to Related Parties (continued)
On
September 12, 14 and 19, 2006 the Company entered into Note Purchase Agreements
with respect to the purchase from the Company of a total of $2,300,000 principal
amount of its 7.25% Convertible Promissory Notes (the “Notes”) by directors,
former directors, officers and employees of the Company, including the
following: Mr. Robert Howard (as to $1,350,000), former Chairman of the Board
and director of the Company, Mr. James Harlan (as to $300,000), former director
of the Company and Dr. Elliott Sussman (as to $100,000), a director of the
Company, Mr. Steven Rappaport (as to $300,000) who subsequently became and
is
currently a director of the Company and Dr. Lawrence Howard (as to $100,000)
who
subsequently became a director and is currently Chairman of the Board and a
director of the Company, and $50,000 by each of the following executive officers
and/or employees of the Company: Mr. Jeffrey Barnes, Ms. Stacey Stevens and
Ms.
Annette Heroux. The Notes were due two years from the date of issue. On
September 12, 14 and 19, 2008, the total principal amount of $2,300,000 under
the Notes, together with $333,500 of accrued and unpaid interest on such
principal amount, were converted into 1,549,117 shares of the Company’s common
stock at $1.70 per share conversion price as set forth in the Notes. The Notes
have, therefore, been fully repaid and satisfied and were terminated as of
September 12, 14 and 19, 2008, respectively.
Convertible
Loans Payable to Non-Related Parties
On
September 19, 2006 the Company entered into Note Purchase Agreements with
respect to the purchase from the Company of an aggregate of $700,000 principal
amount of its 7.25% Convertible Promissory Note (the “September Notes”) by two
accredited outside investors, pursuant to Note Purchase Agreements between
the
Company and each of the investors. The loans were evidenced by the September
Notes issued by the Company in favor of the non-related parties. The September
Notes were due two years from the date of issue. On September 19, 2008, the
total principal amount of $700,000 under the September Notes, together with
$101,500 of accrued and unpaid interest on such principal amount, were converted
into 471,471 shares of the Company’s common stock at $1.70 per share. The
September Notes have, therefore, been fully repaid and satisfied and were
terminated as of September 19, 2008.
10
iCAD,
INC.
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
September
30, 2008
(3) |
Earning
per Share
|
The
Company’s basic earnings per share is computed by dividing net profit or loss
available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of shares of
common stock outstanding for the period and, if there are dilutive securities,
diluted earnings per share is computed by including common stock equivalents
outstanding for the period in the denominator. Common stock equivalents include
shares issuable upon the exercise of stock options, convertible notes and
warrants, net of shares assumed to have been purchased with the proceeds, using
the treasury stock method. A summary of the Company’s calculation of
earnings per share is as follows:
Three Months Ended
|
Nine Months Ended
|
||||||||||||
September 30,
|
September 30,
|
||||||||||||
2008
|
2007
|
2008
|
2007
|
||||||||||
Net
income (loss)
|
$
|
2,094,574
|
$
|
(670,045
|
)
|
$
|
4,035,320
|
$
|
(2,063,593
|
)
|
|||
Less
preferred dividends
|
-
|
(11,880
|
)
|
-
|
(67,760
|
)
|
|||||||
Net
income (loss) available to common shareholders – basic
|
$
|
2,094,574
|
$
|
(681,925
|
)
|
$
|
4,035,320
|
$
|
(2,131,353
|
)
|
|||
Add
interest relating to convertible loans payable
|
38,868
|
-
|
238,488
|
-
|
|||||||||
Net
income (loss) available to common shareholders – diluted
|
$
|
2,133,442
|
$
|
(681,925
|
)
|
$
|
4,273,808
|
$
|
(2,131,353
|
)
|
|||
Basic
shares used in the calculation of earnings per share
|
42,953,932
|
38,707,772
|
40,487,297
|
38,076,299
|
|||||||||
Effect
of dilutive securities:
|
|||||||||||||
Stock
options
|
1,917,916
|
-
|
1,720,431
|
-
|
|||||||||
Restricted
stock
|
244,592
|
-
|
68,233
|
-
|
|||||||||
Convertible
loans payable
|
1,462,276
|
-
|
2,965,314
|
-
|
|||||||||
Stock
warrants
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||
Diluted
shares used in the calculation of earnings per share
|
46,578,716
|
38,707,772
|
45,241,275
|
38,076,299
|
|||||||||
Net
income (loss) per share :
|
|||||||||||||
Basic
|
$
|
0.05
|
$
|
(0.02
|
)
|
$
|
0.10
|
$
|
(0.06
|
)
|
|||
Diluted
|
$
|
0.04
|
$
|
(0.02
|
)
|
$
|
0.09
|
$
|
(0.06
|
)
|
The
following table summarizes the number of shares of common stock for securities
that were not included in the calculation of diluted net income (loss) per
share
because such shares are antidilutive:
Three Months Ended
|
Nine Months Ended
|
||||||||||||
September 30,
|
September 30,
|
||||||||||||
2008
|
2007
|
2008
|
2007
|
||||||||||
Stock
options
|
965,266
|
5,585,535
|
1,931,322
|
5,585,535
|
|||||||||
Restricted
stock
|
5,000
|
375,000
|
5,000
|
375,000
|
|||||||||
Stock
warrants
|
1,003,311
|
1,003,311
|
1,003,311
|
1,003,311
|
|||||||||
Convertible
Revolving Promissory Note
|
-
|
1,465,041
|
-
|
1,465,041
|
|||||||||
Convertible
loans payable
|
-
|
2,098,039
|
-
|
2,098,039
|
|||||||||
1,973,577
|
10,526,926
|
2,939,633
|
10,526,926
|
11
iCAD,
INC.
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
September
30, 2008
(4) |
Stock-Based
Compensation
|
The
Company follows the provisions of Statement No. 123R, Share-Based
Payment
(“SFAS
123R”) and Staff Accounting Bulletin 107 ("SAB 107") for all share-based
compensation that was not vested as of January 1, 2006. The Company adopted
SFAS 123R using a modified prospective application, as permitted under SFAS
123R. Accordingly, prior period amounts have not been restated. Under this
application, the Company is required to record compensation expense for all
awards granted after the date of adoption and for the unvested portion of
previously granted awards that remain outstanding at the date of adoption.
The
Company issued 504,736 stock options and 564,750 shares of restricted stock
in
the nine months ended September 30, 2008. The options granted during the nine
months of 2008 had a weighted average exercise price of $2.46. The weighted
average fair value of options granted during the nine month period ended
September 30, 2008 was $1.08 and was estimated on the grant date using the
Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following weighted average
assumptions: expected volatility of 62.8%, expected term of 3.5 years, risk-free
interest rate of 3.02%, and expected dividend yield of 0%. Expected volatility
is based on peer group volatility, also using the Company’s historical
volatility within the peer group. The average expected life was calculated
using
the simplified method under SAB 107. The risk-free rate is based on the rate
of
U.S. Treasury zero-coupon issues with a remaining term equal to the expected
life of option grants. The Company recorded $1,354,635 for share-based
compensation in accordance with SFAS 123R for the nine months ended September
30, 2008.
For
the
same period in 2007, the Company issued 1,045,840 stock options and 375,000
shares of restricted stock. The options granted during the first nine months
of
2007 had a weighted average exercise price of $2.84. The weighted average fair
value of options granted during the nine month period ended September 30, 2007
was $1.86 and was estimated on the grant date using the Black-Scholes
option-pricing model with the following weighted average assumptions: expected
volatility of 62.8%, expected term of 3.5 years, risk-free interest rate of
4.72%, and expected dividend yield of 0%. Expected volatility was based on
peer
group volatility, also using the Company’s historical volatility within the peer
group. The average expected life was calculated using the simplified method
under SAB 107. The risk-free rate is based on the rate of U.S. Treasury
zero-coupon issues with a remaining term equal to the expected life of option
grants. The Company recorded $855,533 for share-based compensation in accordance
with SFAS 123R for the nine months ended September 30, 2007.
12
iCAD,
INC.
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
September
30, 2008
(4) |
Stock-Based
Compensation (continued)
|
As
of
September 30, 2008 there was approximately $3,828,546 of total unrecognized
compensation cost related to unvested options and restricted stock. That cost
is
expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of three years.
The
Company’s aggregate intrinsic value of options outstanding at September 30, 2008
was $4,303,860.
(5) |
Fair
Value Measurements
|
Effective
January 1, 2008, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards (“SFAS”) No. 157, “Fair
Value Measurements”
(“SFAS
157”). In February 2008, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”)
issued FASB Staff Position, FAS 157-2, “Effective Date of FASB Statement
No. 157”, which provides a one year deferral of the effective date of SFAS
157 for non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities, except those that
are recognized or disclosed in the financial statements at fair value at least
annually. Therefore, the Company has adopted the provisions of SFAS 157 with
respect to its financial assets and liabilities only. SFAS 157, establishes
a
framework for measuring fair value under generally accepted accounting
principles and enhances disclosures about fair value measurements. Fair value
is
defined under SFAS 157 as the exchange price that would be received for an
asset
or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most
advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between
market participants on the measurement date. Valuation techniques used to
measure fair value under SFAS 157 must maximize the use of observable inputs
and
minimize the use of unobservable inputs. The standard describes a fair value
hierarchy based on three levels of inputs, of which the first two are considered
observable and the last unobservable, that may be used to measure fair value
which are the following:
§
|
Level
1 - Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or
liabilities.
|
§
|
Level
2 - Inputs other than Level 1 that are observable, either directly
or
indirectly, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities;
quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that
are
observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for
substantially the full term of the assets or
liabilities.
|
§
|
Level
3 - Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market
activity
and that are significant to the fair
value.
|
A
financial instrument’s level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the
lowest level of any input that is significant to the fair value measurement.
13
iCAD,
INC.
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
September
30, 2008
(5) |
Fair
Value Measurements (continued)
|
The
adoption of this statement did not have a material impact on the Company’s
consolidated results of operations and financial condition.
In
accordance with SFAS 157, the Company’s financial assets that are measured at
fair value on a recurring basis as of September 30, 2008 are cash equivalents.
The cash equivalents are measured using Level 1 inputs.
(6) |
Commitments
and Contingencies
|
In
July
2007, a dissolved former Canadian subsidiary of the Company, CADx Medical
Systems Inc. (“CADx Medical”), received a tax re-assessment of approximately
$6,800,000 from the Canada Revenue Agency (“CRA”) resulting from CRA’s audit of
CADx Medical’s Canadian federal tax return for the year ended December 31, 2002.
The Company believes that it will not be liable for the re-assessment against
CADx Medical and no accrual was recorded as of September 30, 2008. The Company
responded to the notice outlining its grounds of objection with respect to
the
re-assessment. The CRA responded acknowledging receipt of the correspondence
and
advised that they intend to schedule a review on the matter.
(7) |
Income
Taxes
|
Effective
January 1, 2007, the Company adopted the provisions of FASB Interpretation
No.
48, "Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes—an interpretation of FASB
Statement No. 109" ("FIN 48"). At September 30, 2008, the Company had no
material unrecognized tax benefits and no adjustments to liabilities or
operations were required under FIN 48. The Company does not expect that the
unrecognized tax benefits will materially increase within the next twelve
months. The Company did not recognize any interest or penalties related to
uncertain tax positions at September 30, 2008. The Company files United States
federal income tax returns and income tax returns in various state and local
jurisdictions. The Company currently is not under examination by the Internal
Revenue Service or other jurisdictions for any tax years. The Company’s
effective income tax rate was 6% for the nine months ended September 30, 2008
and no income tax expense was provided for the nine month period ended September
30, 2007. The effective income tax rate is based upon the estimated income
for
the year. For the nine month period ended September 30, 2008, the effective
tax
rate varied from the statutory tax rate principally due to federal and state
net
operating loss carryforwards available.
14
iCAD,
INC.
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
September
30, 2008
(8) |
Asset
Acquisition
|
On
July
18, 2008, the Company completed the acquisition of substantially all of the
assets of 3TP LLC dba CAD Sciences, a New York limited liability company (”CAD
Sciences”) pursuant to an Asset Purchase Agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”)
dated June 20, 2008 between the Company and the Seller.
In
accordance with the terms of the Purchase Agreement, the purchase price of
$5,000,000 paid by the Company to CAD Sciences consisted of (i) $2,000,000
in
cash and (ii) $3,000,000 in stock comprised of 1,086,957 restricted shares
of
the Company’s common stock (“shares”).
Simultaneously
with the closing of the transactions contemplated by the Purchase Agreement,
the
Company entered into an Escrow Agreement by and among the Company, CAD Sciences
and U.S. Bank National Association (the “Escrow Agreement”) pursuant to which
271,740 of the shares were deposited by the parties into an escrow account
for a
period of up to one year to secure CAD Sciences’s indemnity obligations to the
Company under the Purchase Agreement. The Escrow Agreement provides that, of
the
escrowed shares, 181,160 shares will be held in escrow for 6 months and the
remaining escrow shares will be held in escrow for one year, in each case
subject to earlier disbursement (in accordance with the terms of the Escrow
Agreement) to the Company in satisfaction of any indemnification obligations
arising under the terms of the Purchase Agreement.
The
purchase price of $5,000,000 plus $167,448 in acquisition costs incurred, has
been allocated to net assets acquired based upon an appraisal of their fair
values, but the allocation is subject to further adjustment.
The
following is a summary of the preliminary allocation of the total purchase
price
based on the estimated fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities
assumed as of the date of the asset acquisition and the amortizable lives of
the
intangible assets:
Amortizable
|
|
||||||
|
|
Amount
|
|
Life
|
|||
Accounts
Receivable
|
$
|
117,000
|
|||||
Property
and equipment
|
25,009
|
||||||
Technology
asset
|
4,853,881
|
10
Years
|
|||||
Customer
relationships
|
242,833
|
10
Years
|
|||||
Warranty
liabilities
|
(71,275
|
)
|
|||||
Purchase
price
|
$
|
5,167,448
|
15
Item
2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results
of
Operations
"Safe
Harbor" Statement under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of
1995:
Certain
information included in this Item 2 and elsewhere in this Form 10-Q that are
not
historical facts contain forward looking statements that involve a number of
known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that could cause the
actual results, performance or achievements of the Company to be materially
different from any future results, performance or achievement expressed or
implied by such forward looking statements. These risks and uncertainties
include, but are not limited to, uncertainty of future sales levels, protection
of patents and other proprietary rights, the impact of supply and manufacturing
constraints or difficulties, product market acceptance, possible technological
obsolescence of products, increased competition, litigation and/or government
regulation, changes in Medicare reimbursement policies, competitive factors,
the
effects of a decline in the economy in markets served by the Company and other
risks detailed in the Company’s other filings with the Securities and Exchange
Commission. The words “believe”, “demonstrate”, “intend”, “expect”, “estimate”,
“anticipate”, “likely”, “seek”, “should” and similar expressions identify
forward-looking statements. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance
on
those forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date the statement
was made.
Results
of Operations
Overview
iCAD
is
an industry-leading provider of advanced image analysis and workflow solutions
that enable radiologists and other healthcare professionals to better serve
patients by identifying pathologies and pinpointing cancer earlier. iCAD offers
a comprehensive range of high-performance, expandable Computer-Aided Detection
(CAD) systems and workflow solutions for mammography (film-based, digital
radiography (DR) and computed radiography (CR), Magnetic Resonance Imaging
(MRI), and Computed Tomography (CT)). Currently available in more than 2,200
healthcare centers worldwide, iCAD’s solutions aid in the early detection of the
most prevalent cancers including breast, prostate and colon cancer. Early
detection of cancer is the key to better prognosis, less invasive and lower
treatment costs, and higher survival rates. Performed as an adjunct to
mammography screening, CAD has quickly become the standard of care in breast
cancer detection, helping radiologists improve clinical outcomes while enhancing
workflow. Computer-enhanced breast and prostate MRI analysis streamlines case
interpretation workflow and generates more robust information for more effective
patient treatment. CAD for mammography screening is also reimbursable in the
United States under federal and most third-party insurance programs. Since
receiving FDA approval for the Company’s first breast cancer detection product
in January 2002, over twenty two hundred of our CAD systems have been placed
in
mammography practices worldwide. iCAD is the only stand alone company offering
CAD solutions for the early detection of breast cancer.
16
In
late
2005, the Company began to see a shift in sales from its film based analog
CAD
technology to its digital CAD technology. This shift has been primarily fueled
by the results reported in 2005 in the New England Journal of Medicine from
the
American College of Radiology Imaging Network’s (ACRIN) Digital Mammographic
Imaging Screening Trial (DMIST). The trial showed that there was no difference
in accuracy between the two modalities for screening asymptomatic women in
general. But for three subgroups of women (which represent over 60% of the
population), digital mammography performed better than film-based analog
mammography. Additionally, digital mammography offers better clinical images
combined with significant workflow improvements for the radiologist. CAD
technology is more often purchased for use with digital mammography equipment
than is purchased for use with analog mammography equipment.
iCAD’s
CAD mammography products have been shown to detect up to 72 percent of the
cancers that biopsy proved were missed on the previous mammogram, an average
of
15 months earlier. Our advanced pattern recognition technology analyzes images
to identify patterns and then uses sophisticated mathematical analysis to mark
suspicious areas.
The
Company intends to apply its core competencies in pattern recognition and
algorithm development in disease detection. Our focus is on the development
and
marketing of cancer detection products for disease states where there are
established or emerging protocols for screening as a standard of care. iCAD
expects to pursue development or acquisition of products for select disease
states where it is clinically proven that screening has a significant positive
impact on patient outcomes, where there is an opportunity to lower health care
costs, where screening is non-invasive or minimally invasive and where public
awareness is high. Virtual colonoscopy (CTC) is a technology that has evolved
rapidly in recent years. We expect that the market for virtual colonoscopy
will
grow. The anticipated growth is due to the increased demand for the procedures
for early detection of colon cancer, combined with the recent results of the
National CT Colonography Trial demonstrating that CTC is highly accurate for
the
detection of intermediate and large polyps and that the accuracy of CTC is
similar to colonoscopy. CT Colonography or CTC is emerging as an alternative
imaging procedure for evaluation of the colon. The Company has developed a
product for computer aided detection of polyps in the colon using CTC and is
currently in clinical trials. Colorectal cancer has been shown to be
highly preventable with early detection and removal of polyps.
The
Company’s CAD systems include proprietary algorithm and other technology
together with standard computer and display equipment. CAD systems for the
film-based analog mammography market also include a radiographic film digitizer,
manufactured by the Company and others for the digitization of film-based
medical images. In July 2008, the Company acquired pharmaco-kinetic based CAD
products that aid in the interpretation of contrast enhanced MRI images of
the
breast and prostate and expects to begin marketing these products in the fourth
quarter of 2008.
The
Company’s headquarters are located in southern New Hampshire, with manufacturing
and contract manufacturing facilities in New Hampshire and Massachusetts and
research and development facilities in Ohio and New York.
17
Critical
Accounting Policies
The
Company’s discussion and analysis of its financial condition, results of
operations, and cash flows are based on our consolidated financial statements,
which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States. The preparation of these financial statements
requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts
of
assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent
assets and liabilities. On an on-going basis, we evaluate these estimates,
including those related to accounts receivable allowance, inventory valuation
and obsolescence, intangible assets, income taxes, warranty obligations,
contingencies and litigation. Additionally, we use assumptions and estimates
in
calculations to determine stock-based compensation. We base our estimates on
historical experience and on various other assumptions that we believe to be
reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for
making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are
not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these
estimates under different assumptions or conditions.
The
Company’s critical accounting policies are set forth in its Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007. The Company believes
that
revenue recognition is a critical accounting policy because it is governed
by
multiple complex accounting rules, however there are no significant estimates
or
assumptions used in recording the Company’s revenue.
Quarter
Ended September 30, 2008 compared to Quarter Ended September 30, 2007 and Nine
Months Ended September 30, 2008 compared to Nine Months Ended September 30,
2007
Revenue.
Revenue
for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2008 was $11,193,631
and $28,175,136, respectively, compared with revenue of $6,259,541 and
$18,511,763 for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2007.
In
the nine month period ended September 30, 2008, sales of iCAD’s digital
solutions increased $8,998,207 or 78.9% to $20,403,283, compared to sales of
$11,405,076 in the nine month period in 2007.
The
increase in revenue for the nine month period ended September 30, 2008, was
due
primarily to the substantial increase in digital CAD revenue during the second
and third quarters of 2008. The Company’s digital revenue for the third quarter
of 2008 increased $4,165,847 or 104.4%, to $8,155,673, compared to sales of
$3,989,826 in the same period in 2007. These increases are due primarily to
the
release, during the second quarter of 2008, of the Company’s SecondLook Digital
CAD for sale with Fujifilm Computed Radiography for Mammography
(“FCRm”)
systems, as well as an increase in business from the Company’s other OEM
customers due to the continued increased global demand for Full Field Digital
Mammography (FFDM) systems and digital CAD technology for the detection of
breast cancer.
On
April
4, 2008 the Company announced that its SecondLook®
Digital
CAD system for mammography received approval from the U.S. Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) for sale with Fuji’s
FCRm
systems.
SecondLook Digital for
FCRm
is the
first CAD product approved and available in the U.S. for use with computer
radiography.
18
Sales
of
iCAD’s film based product revenue increased 47.5% or $697,889 in the third
quarter of 2008, to $2,166,839 in 2008 compared to $1,468,950 in the third
quarter of 2007, and an increase of 14.4% or $662,870 for the nine month period
ended September 30, 2008, to $5,250,976 in 2008, compared to $4,588,106 in
the
same period of 2007. While the transition to digital technology has a
significant positive impact on overall performance, the film based products
are
a mature product line. However, film based product revenue has benefited from
demand for the Company’s TotalLook product that is used for digitizing film
based prior mammography exams for comparative reading with current mammography
exams. In addition, a new version of the Company’s TotalLook product, the
TotalLook Mammo Advantage, was introduced late in the first quarter of 2008
and
the Company has received favorable customer feedback to this
product.
Service
and supply revenue increased 8.8% in the third quarter of 2008, to $871,119
compared to $800,765 in the third quarter in 2007 and an increase of 0.1% or
$2,296, from $2,518,581 to $2,520,877 for the nine month period ended September
30, 2008, compared to the same nine month period in 2007. The increase in the
Company’s service revenue for the nine month period ended September 30, 2008 is
due primarily to increased service contract revenue on the Company’s digital and
TotalLook products.
Three months ended September 30,
|
|||||||||||||
2008
|
2007
|
Change
|
% Change
|
||||||||||
Digital revenue
|
$
|
8,155,673
|
$
|
3,989,826
|
$
|
4,165,847
|
104.4
|
%
|
|||||
Analog
revenue
|
2,166,839
|
1,468,950
|
697,889
|
47.5
|
%
|
||||||||
Service
& supply revenue
|
871,119
|
800,765
|
70,354
|
8.8
|
%
|
||||||||
Total
revenue
|
$
|
11,193,631
|
$
|
6,259,541
|
$
|
4,934,090
|
78.8
|
%
|
Nine months ended September 30,
|
|||||||||||||
2008
|
2007
|
Change
|
% Change
|
||||||||||
Digital revenue
|
$
|
20,403,283
|
$
|
11,405,076
|
$
|
8,998,207
|
78.9
|
%
|
|||||
Analog
revenue
|
5,250,976
|
4,588,106
|
662,870
|
14.4
|
%
|
||||||||
Service
& supply revenue
|
2,520,877
|
2,518,581
|
2,296
|
0.1
|
%
|
||||||||
Total
revenue
|
$
|
28,175,136
|
$
|
18,511,763
|
$
|
9,663,373
|
52.2
|
%
|
Gross
Margin. Gross
margin increased to 84.1% and 83.5% for the three and nine month periods ended
September 30, 2008 compared to 80.1% in the same three and nine month periods
in
2007. This 4.0% and 3.4% increase in gross margin for the three and nine month
periods of 2008 is primarily attributable to increased volume of the Company’s
digital products which have a higher gross margin than its film based products
which include more hardware components and the realization of some component
cost reductions and some average selling price increases.
Engineering
and Product Development. Engineering
and product development costs for the three and nine month periods ended
September 30, 2008 increased by $776,496 or 68.8% and $1,491,001 or 44.8%,
respectively, from $1,129,345 and $3,327,644 in 2007 to $1,905,841 and
$4,818,645, respectively, in 2008. The increase in engineering and product
development costs during the three and nine month periods ended September 30,
2008 was primarily due to an increase in personnel and related costs of $467,000
and $1,009,000, respectively, resulting from staff increases to support the
Company’s new product development efforts, $162,000 and $327,000, respectively,
in subcontracting services relating primarily to the clinical trials for its
CT
Colon product, and approximately $106,000 in amortization expense relating
to
the asset acquisition of CAD Sciences in the third quarter of 2008.
19
Marketing
and Sales. Marketing
and sales expense for the three and nine month periods ended September 30,
2008
increased by $719,245 or 27.4% and $610,029 or 7.7%, respectively, from
$2,620,827 and $7,923,032 in 2007 to $3,340,072 and $8,533,061 in 2008. The
increase in marketing and sales expense for the three month period ending
September 30, 2008 was primarily attributable to a $709,000 increase in
personnel, sales commission and related expenses and
rebranding cost associated with our new MRI CAD products of $100,000, offset
by
decreases in consulting and subcontracted services of $137,000. The
increase in marketing and sales expense for the nine month period ended
September 30, 2008, primarily resulted from an increase in personnel, sales
commission and related expenses of
$934,000,
travel expenses of $139,000 and rebranding cost associated with our new MRI
CAD
products of $100,000, offset by decreases in consulting and subcontracted
services of $336,000 and warranty costs of $247,000.
General
and Administrative. General
and administrative expenses for the three and nine month periods ended September
30, 2008 increased by $125,925 or 6.9% and $406,856 or 7.6%, respectively,
from
$1,816,657 and $5,319,963 in 2007 to $1,942,582 and $5,726,819 in 2008,
respectively. The increase in general and administrative expense during the
three month period ended September 30, 2008 was due primarily to an increase
in
stock based compensation expense of approximately $91,000, increases in
wage related and fringe benefit expenses of $92,000, offset by a decrease in
legal expenses of $72,000. For the nine month period ended September 30, 2008
the increase was primarily due to an increase in stock based compensation
expense of approximately $418,000 and wage related and fringe benefit expense
of
$273,000, offset by a decrease in legal fees of $146,000, recruiting fees of
$71,000 and travel expenses of $78,000.
Interest
Expense.
Net
interest expense for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2008
decreased from $114,752 and $329,891, respectively, in 2007 to $27,610 and
$210,314 in 2008. This decrease is due primarily to the extinguishment of the
Company’s outstanding convertible loans during the second and third quarters of
2008 and the decrease in the interest rate on the Company’s Prior Loan Agreement
with Mr. Robert Howard which bore interest at the prime rate plus 1%. The
interest rate decreased from approximately 9.25% in the first six months of
2007
to approximately 6.25% in the comparable period of 2008.
Provision
for Income Taxes. The
provision for income taxes for the three and nine month periods ended September
30, 2008 of $101,000 and $197,000, respectively, consists of an estimate for
federal alternative minimum tax expense and various state income taxes based
upon the estimated effective income tax rate for the full fiscal
year.
Net
Income/(Loss). As
a
result of the foregoing, the Company recorded net income of $2,094,574 or $0.05
per basic share for the three month period ended September 30, 2008 on revenue
of $11,193,631 compared to a net loss of ($670,045) or ($0.02) per basic share
on revenue of $6,259,541 for the three months ended September 30, 2007. The
net
income for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 was $4,035,320 or $0.10
per
basic share on revenue of $28,175,136, compared to a net loss of ($2,063,593)
or
($0.06) per basic share on revenue of $18,511,763 for the nine months ended
September 30, 2007.
20
Backlog.
The
Company’s product backlog (excluding service and supplies) and deferred
installation revenue as of September 30, 2008 totaled approximately $1,587,000
as compared to product backlog of $1,716,000 as of September 30, 2007. It is
expected that the majority of the product backlog at September 30, 2008 will
be
shipped within the current fiscal year. Backlog as of any particular period
should not be relied upon as indicative of the Company’s net revenues for any
future period as a large amount of the Company’s product is booked and shipped
within the same quarter.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
The
Company believes that its current liquidity and capital resources are sufficient
to sustain operations through at least the next 12 months, primarily due to
cash
on hand, cash expected to be generated from continuing operations, as well
as
the availability of a credit line under the RBS Loan Agreement. At
this
point in time, our liquidity has not been materially impacted by the recent
and
unprecedented disruption in the current capital and credit markets and we do
not
expect that it will be materially impacted in the near future. We will continue
to closely monitor our liquidity and the capital and credit
markets.
The
RBS
Loan Agreement replaces the Prior Loan Agreement with Mr. Robert Howard,
the Company’s former Chairman of the Board of Directors, which was fully repaid
and terminated on June 30, 2008. The RBS Loan Agreement established a secured
revolving credit facility with a line of credit of up to $5,000,000. The
borrowing base under the RBS Loan Agreement is limited to 80% of eligible
accounts receivable or,
if
adjusted EBITDA (EBITDA is defined in the agreement as earnings before interest
expense, income tax expense, depreciation, amortization and SFAS 123R stock
option expense) for the quarter is greater than or equal to $1,250,000, then
the
Company will not be subject to a restriction as to availability of credit upon
the borrowing base. In this event, the Company will be subject to compliance
with a Total Funded Debt to Adjusted EBITDA covenant. As
of
September 30, 2008, the Company had $5,000,000 of available borrowing capacity.
Unless earlier repaid, all amounts due and owing under the RBS Loan Agreement
are required to be repaid on June 30, 2009, the stated termination date of
the
RBS Loan Agreement.
The
RBS
Loan Agreement contains certain financial and non-financial covenants relating
to the Company. The RBS Loan Agreement also contains certain events of default.
Amounts due under the RBS Loan Agreement and the related Revolving Note made
by
the Company in favor of RBS, may be prepaid at any time, in whole or in part,
at
the option of the Company, provided, however, that for any portion of the loan
accruing interest as a “LIBOR Rate Loan” (as defined the in the RBS Loan
Agreement), the Company is responsible to pay any LIBOR Breakage Fee as defined
and further described in the Revolving Note. All amounts outstanding under
the
RBS Loan Agreement and the associated Revolving Note will bear interest, at
the
Company’s option, at a fluctuating per annum rate of interest equal to (i) Prime
Rate (as defined in the Revolving Note) plus one-half of one percent or (ii)
the
Adjusted LIBOR Rate (as defined in the Revolving Note) plus the LIBOR Rate
Margin (as defined in the Revolving Note).
In
connection with the RBS Loan Agreement and the Revolving Note, the Company
has
entered into a Negative Pledge Agreement dated June 30, 2008 and made in favor
of RBS. Pursuant to the Negative Pledge Agreement, the Company agreed, among
other things, (i) not to incur any liens, other than as permitted under the
RBS
Loan Agreement, with respect to the Company’s intellectual property and (ii) not
to sell or assign, other than for fair consideration in the ordinary course
of
business, the Company’s intellectual property. In addition, the Company assigned
all its assets to RBS wherever located and whether now owned or hereafter
acquired, including, without limitation, all inventory, machinery, equipment,
fixtures and other goods.
21
The
Company's ability to generate cash adequate to meet its future capital
requirements will depend primarily on operating cash flow. If sales or cash
collections are reduced from current expectations, or if expenses and cash
requirements are increased, the Company may require additional financing.
At
September 30, 2008 the Company had current assets of $19,438,988, current
liabilities of $7,018,780 and working capital of $12,420,208. The ratio of
current assets to current liabilities was 2.8:1
Net
cash
provided by operating activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2008
was $7,625,171, compared to net cash used of $172,176 for the same period in
2007. The cash provided by operating activities for the nine months ended
September 30, 2008 resulted from the net income of $4,035,320, a decrease in
accounts receivable of $584,514 and increases in accrued expenses and deferred
revenue totaling $912,928, plus non-cash items including, depreciation,
amortization, loss on disposal of assets and interest expense associated with
discount on convertible loans payable all totaling $1,360,900 and stock based
compensation of $1,354,635 offset by increases in inventory of $15,280 and
other
current assets of $239,510, and a decrease in accounts payable of
$368,336.
The
net
cash used for investing activities for the nine months ended September 30,
2008
was $2,534,214 compared to net cash used for investing activities of $449,682
for the same period in 2007. The net cash used for investing activities during
2008 consisted of additions to property and equipment of $534,214 and $2,000,000
for the acquisition of assets of CAD Sciences.
Net
cash
provided by financing activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2008
was $1,609,996, compared to net cash provided by financing activities of
$856,327 for the same period in 2007. The cash provided by financing activities
during 2008 was due to cash received from the issuance of common stock relating
to the exercise of stock options totaling $1,868,902, offset by the payment
of
convertible notes payable in the amount of $258,906.
Contractual
Obligations
The
following table summarizes, for the periods presented, the Company’s future
estimated cash payments under existing contractual obligations at September
30,
2008.
Payments due by period
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Total
|
Less than 1
year
|
1-3 years
|
3-5 years
|
5+ years
|
|||||||||||
Lease
Obligations*
|
$
|
1,378,958
|
$
|
213,072
|
$
|
945,566
|
$
|
220,320
|
$
|
-
|
||||||
Total
Contractual Obligations
|
$
|
1,378,958
|
$
|
213,072
|
$
|
945,566
|
$
|
220,320
|
$
|
-
|
*
The
Company’s lease obligations is shown net of sublease amounts.
22
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
In
May
2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 162, The
Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles.
This
statement identifies the sources of accounting principles and the framework
for
selecting the principles to be used in the preparation of financial statements
that are presented in conformity with generally accepted accounting
principles in the United States. This statement is effective 60 days
following the SEC’s approval of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board
amendments to AU Section 411, The
Meaning of Present Fairly in Conformity with Generally Accepted Accounting
Principles.
We do
not expect SFAS No. 162 to have a material impact on our consolidated financial
statements.
On
January 1, 2008, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards (“SFAS”) No. 157, Fair Value Measurements. This Statement defines
fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value, and expands
disclosures about fair value measurements. It clarifies that fair value is
the
price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability
in
an orderly transaction between market participants in the market in which the
reporting entity transacts. This Statement does not require any new fair value
measurements, but rather, it provides enhanced guidance to other pronouncements
that require or permit assets or liabilities to be measured at fair value.
The
adoption of this standard only resulted in additional disclosure requirements
and had no impact on the Company’s financial condition or results of operation.
See Note 5 of the unaudited consolidated financial statements for further
information regarding the fair value of the Company’s financial
instruments.
In
December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141 (Revised 2007), “Business
Combinations” (“SFAS 141R”). SFAS 141R retains the fundamental requirements in
Statement 141 that the acquisition method of accounting (which Statement 141
called the purchase method) be used for all business combinations and for an
acquirer to be identified for each business combination. SFAS 141R requires
an
acquirer to recognize the assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, and any
non-controlling interest in the acquiree at the acquisition date, to be measured
at their fair values as of that date, with limited exceptions specified in
the
Statement. That replaces Statement 141’s cost-allocation process, which required
the cost of an acquisition to be allocated to the individual assets acquired
and
liabilities assumed based on their estimated fair values. SFAS 141R retains
the
guidance in Statement 141 for identifying and recognizing intangible assets
separately from goodwill. SFAS 141R will now require acquisition costs to be
expensed as incurred, restructuring costs associated with a business combination
must generally be expensed prior to the acquisition date and changes in deferred
tax asset valuation allowances and income tax uncertainties after the
acquisition date (including prior acquisitions) generally will affect income
tax
expense. SFAS 141R applies prospectively to business combinations for which
the
acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting
period beginning on or after December 15, 2008 except for income taxes, as
noted
above. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the adoption of SFAS
141R on its consolidated financial statements.
In
February 2007, the FASB issued Statement No. 159, “The Fair Value Option
for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities” (“SFAS 159”), including an
amendment of FASB Statement No. 115, which allows an entity to elect to
record financial assets and liabilities at fair value upon their initial
recognition on a contract-by-contract basis. Subsequent changes in fair value
would be recognized in earnings as the changes occur. SFAS 159 also
establishes additional disclosure requirements for these items stated at fair
value. SFAS 159 is effective as of the beginning of an entity’s first
fiscal year that begins after November 15, 2007. The Company did not elect
to adopt the fair value option under this statement.
23
Item
3. Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
Not
applicable.
Item 4. Controls
and Procedures
The
Company, under the supervision and with the participation of its management,
including its principal executive officer and principal financial officer,
evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of its disclosure
controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report.
Based on this evaluation, the principal executive officer and principal
financial officer concluded that the Company's disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934
(”Exchange Act”) were effective at the reasonable level of assurance.
A
control
system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable,
not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met.
Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are
resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative
to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems,
no
evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues
and instances of fraud, if any, within the Company have been detected. Because
of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system, misstatements
due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected. The Company conducts
periodic evaluations to enhance, where necessary its procedures and
controls.
The
Company’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer conducted
an evaluation of the Company's internal control over financial reporting (as
defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f)) to determine whether any changes in
internal control over financial reporting occurred during the quarter ended
September 30, 2008, that have materially affected or which are reasonably likely
to materially affect internal control over financial reporting. Based on that
evaluation, there has been no such change during such period.
24
PART
II OTHER INFORMATION
Item
2.
Unregistered
Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.
During
the quarter ended September 30, 2008 the Company issued an aggregate of
2,020,588 shares of its unregistered common stock at a price of $1.70 per share
upon conversion of an aggregate of $3,435,000 of principal and interest owed
to
a total of ten individuals consisting of three directors, two executive
officers, an employee and two former directors, (one of whom is a principal
stockholder of the Company) and two accredited outside investors. No
remuneration was paid or given to any party for soliciting the conversion of
the
amounts due under the Company’s 7.25% Convertible Promissory Notes. All of the
common stock issuances were made in private transactions and the certificates
issued to related parties representing the shares, contained legends regarding
restriction on transfer under the Securities Act of 1933 (“Act”). The shares of
common stock were issued under exemptions from registration under Sections
3(a)(9) and/or 4(2) of the Act.
The
following table represents information with respect to purchases of common
stock
made by the Company during the three months ended September 30,
2008:
Month of purchase
|
Total number
of shares
purchased (1)
|
Average
price paid
per share
|
Total number of
shares purchased
as part of
publicly
announced plans
or programs
|
Maximum dollar
value of shares
that may yet be
purchaed under
the plans or
programs
|
|||||||||
July 1 – July 31,
2008
|
14,990
|
$
|
2.84
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
||||||
August
1 – August 31, 2008
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
||||||
September
1 - September 30, 2008
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
||||||
Total
|
14,990
|
$
|
2.84
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
(1) Represents
shares of common stock surrendered to the Company to pay employee withholding
taxes due upon the vesting of restricted stock.
Item
6.
Exhibits
Description
|
||
31.1
|
Certification
of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002.
|
|
31.2
|
Certification
of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002.
|
|
32.1
|
Certification
of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002.
|
|
32.2
|
Certification
of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002.
|
25
Signatures
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant
has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto
duly authorized.
iCAD,
Inc.
|
||
(Registrant)
|
||
Date:
November 7, 2008
|
By:
|
/s/
Kenneth M. Ferry
|
Kenneth
M. Ferry
|
||
President,
Chief Executive Officer,
|
||
Director
|
||
Date:
November 7, 2008
|
By:
|
/s/
Darlene M. Deptula-Hicks
|
Darlene
M. Deptula-Hicks
|
||
Executive
Vice President of Finance
|
||
and
Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer
|
26