ICAD INC - Quarter Report: 2008 June (Form 10-Q)
UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON,
D.C. 20549
FORM
10-Q
(Mark
One)
x QUARTERLY
REPORT
PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE
ACT OF 1934
For
the
quarterly period ended June
30, 2008
OR
o TRANSITION
REPORT
PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE
ACT OF 1934
For
the
transition period from ________________
to
________________
Commission
file number 1-9341
iCAD,
Inc.
(Exact
name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware
|
02-0377419
|
|
(State
or other jurisdiction
|
(I.R.S.
Employer Identification No.)
|
|
of
incorporation or organization)
|
||
98
Spit Brook Road, Suite 100, Nashua, NH
|
03062
|
|
(Address
of principal executive offices)
|
(Zip
Code)
|
(603)
882-5200
(Registrant's
telephone number, including area code)
Not
Applicable
(Former
name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last
report)
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to
be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required
to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirement
for
the past 90 days. YES x
NO
o.
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.
See
the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller
reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large
Accelerated filer o
|
Accelerated
filer x
|
Non-accelerated
filer o
|
Smaller
reporting company o
|
(do
not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act) YES o
NO
x.
As
of the
close of business on August 6, 2008 there were 41,420,985 shares outstanding
of
the registrant 's Common Stock, $.01 par value.
iCAD,
INC.
INDEX
PAGE
|
|||
PART
I
|
FINANCIAL
INFORMATION
|
||
Item
1
|
Financial
Statements (unaudited)
|
||
Consolidated
Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2008 and
December 31, 2007
|
3
|
||
Consolidated
Statements of Operations for the three
and six month periods ended June 30, 2008 and
2007
|
4
|
||
Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows for the six month
periods ended June 30, 2008 and 2007
|
5
|
||
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements
|
6-14
|
||
Item
2
|
Management's
Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations
|
15-22
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item
3
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
|
23
|
|
Item
4
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
23
|
|
PART
II
|
OTHER
INFORMATION
|
||
Item
2
|
Unregistered
Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
|
23
|
|
Item
4
|
Submission
of Matters to a Vote of Security Holder
|
24
|
|
Item
6
|
Exhibits
|
24
|
|
Signatures
|
26
|
2
iCAD,
INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
Consolidated
Balance Sheets
(unaudited)
June 30,
|
December 31,
|
||||||
|
2008
|
2007
|
|||||
Assets
(Note 2)
|
|||||||
Current
assets:
|
|||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
$
|
7,120,057
|
$
|
4,348,729
|
|||
Trade
accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of
$50,000 in
2008 and 2007
|
6,162,126
|
6,483,618
|
|||||
Inventory,
net
|
2,122,156
|
1,798,243
|
|||||
Prepaid
and other current assets
|
645,977
|
320,169
|
|||||
Total
current assets
|
16,050,316
|
12,950,759
|
|||||
Property
and equipment:
|
|||||||
Equipment
|
3,565,479
|
3,512,557
|
|||||
Leasehold
improvements
|
71,611
|
71,611
|
|||||
Furniture
and fixtures
|
341,280
|
330,077
|
|||||
Marketing
assets
|
323,873
|
323,873
|
|||||
4,302,243
|
4,238,118
|
||||||
Less
accumulated depreciation and amortization
|
2,726,453
|
2,369,590
|
|||||
Net
property and equipment
|
1,575,790
|
1,868,528
|
|||||
Other
assets:
|
|||||||
Deposits
|
63,194
|
63,194
|
|||||
Patents,
net of accumulated amortization
|
29,207
|
68,269
|
|||||
Technology
intangibles, net of accumulated amortization
|
2,807,802
|
3,115,843
|
|||||
Tradename,
net of accumulated amortization
|
136,400
|
148,800
|
|||||
Goodwill
|
43,515,285
|
43,515,285
|
|||||
Total
other assets
|
46,551,888
|
46,911,391
|
|||||
Total
assets
|
$
|
64,177,994
|
$
|
61,730,678
|
|||
Liabilities
and Stockholders' Equity
|
|||||||
Current
liabilities:
|
|||||||
Accounts
payable
|
$
|
1,784,070
|
$
|
2,010,717
|
|||
Accrued
salaries and other expenses
|
2,547,928
|
3,461,422
|
|||||
Deferred
revenue
|
2,074,885
|
1,674,005
|
|||||
Convertible
loans payable to related parties
|
2,297,794
|
2,793,382
|
|||||
Convertible
loans payable to non-related parties
|
694,853
|
684,559
|
|||||
Total
current liabilities
|
9,399,530
|
10,624,085
|
|||||
Convertible
revolving loans payable to related party
|
-
|
2,258,906
|
|||||
Total
liabilities
|
9,399,530
|
12,882,991
|
|||||
Commitments
and contingencies
|
|||||||
Stockholders'
equity:
|
|||||||
Common
stock, $ .01 par value: authorized 85,000,000 shares; issued 41,378,854
in
2008 and 39,239,208 in 2007; outstanding 41,310,978 in 2008 and
39,171,332
in 2007
|
413,788
|
392,392
|
|||||
Additional
paid-in capital
|
139,024,054
|
135,055,418
|
|||||
Accumulated
deficit
|
(83,709,114
|
)
|
(85,649,859
|
)
|
|||
Treasury
stock at cost (67,876 shares)
|
(950,264
|
)
|
(950,264
|
)
|
|||
Total
Stockholders' equity
|
54,778,464
|
48,847,687
|
|||||
Total
liabilities and stockholders' equity
|
$ |
64,177,994
|
$
|
61,730,678
|
See
accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
3
iCAD,
INC.
Consolidated
Statements of Operations
(unaudited)
Three Months Ended
|
Six Months Ended
|
||||||||||||
June 30,
|
June 30,
|
||||||||||||
2008
|
2007
|
2008
|
2007
|
||||||||||
Revenue
|
|||||||||||||
Products
|
$
|
9,677,125
|
$
|
5,263,732
|
$
|
15,331,748
|
$
|
10,534,406
|
|||||
Service
and supplies
|
872,364
|
841,004
|
1,649,757
|
1,717,816
|
|||||||||
Total
revenue
|
10,549,489
|
6,104,736
|
16,981,505
|
$
|
12,252,222
|
||||||||
Cost
of revenue
|
|||||||||||||
Products
|
1,470,227
|
947,172
|
2,425,642
|
1,951,290
|
|||||||||
Service
and supplies
|
263,614
|
271,021
|
446,383
|
475,531
|
|||||||||
Total
cost of revenue
|
1,733,841
|
1,218,193
|
2,872,025
|
2,426,821
|
|||||||||
Gross
margin
|
8,815,648
|
4,886,543
|
14,109,480
|
9,825,401
|
|||||||||
Operating
expenses:
|
|||||||||||||
Engineering
and product development
|
1,503,595
|
1,133,424
|
2,912,804
|
2,198,299
|
|||||||||
Marketing
and sales
|
2,809,466
|
2,793,446
|
5,192,989
|
5,302,205
|
|||||||||
General
and administrative
|
1,935,891
|
1,689,951
|
3,784,237
|
3,503,306
|
|||||||||
Total
operating expenses
|
6,248,952
|
5,616,821
|
11,890,030
|
11,003,810
|
|||||||||
Income
(loss) from operations
|
2,566,696
|
(730,278
|
)
|
2,219,450
|
(1,178,409
|
)
|
|||||||
Interest
expense - net
|
84,098
|
109,333
|
182,705
|
215,139
|
|||||||||
Net
income (loss) before provision for income taxes
|
$
|
2,482,598
|
$
|
(839,611
|
)
|
$
|
2,036,745
|
$
|
(1,393,548
|
)
|
|||
Provision
for income taxes
|
96,000
|
-
|
96,000
|
-
|
|||||||||
Net
income (loss)
|
2,386,598
|
(839,611
|
)
|
1,940,745
|
(1,393,548
|
)
|
|||||||
Preferred
dividend
|
-
|
26,830
|
-
|
55,880
|
|||||||||
Net
income (loss) attributable to common stockholders
|
$
|
2,386,598
|
$
|
(866,441
|
)
|
$
|
1,940,745
|
$
|
(1,449,428
|
)
|
|||
Net
income (loss) per share
|
|||||||||||||
Basic
|
$
|
0.06
|
$
|
(0.02
|
)
|
$
|
0.05
|
$
|
(0.04
|
)
|
|||
Diluted
|
$
|
0.06
|
$
|
(0.02
|
)
|
$
|
0.05
|
$
|
(0.04
|
)
|
|||
Weighted
average number of shares used in computing income (loss) per
share
|
|||||||||||||
Basic
|
39,308,978
|
38,035,094
|
39,240,427
|
37,755,330
|
|||||||||
Diluted
|
44,635,496
|
38,035,094
|
44,179,709
|
37,755,330
|
See
accompanying notes to consolidated financial
statements.
4
iCAD,
INC.
Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows
(unaudited)
Six Months Ended
|
Six Months Ended
|
||||||
June 30, 2008
|
June 30, 2007
|
||||||
Cash
flows from operating activities:
|
|||||||
Net
income (loss)
|
$
|
1,940,745
|
$
|
(1,393,548
|
)
|
||
Adjustments
to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by (used for)
operating activities:
|
|||||||
Depreciation
|
458,829
|
505,284
|
|||||
Amortization
|
359,503
|
359,504
|
|||||
Loss
on disposal of assets
|
-
|
11,145
|
|||||
Stock
based compensation
|
816,643
|
492,608
|
|||||
Non-cash
interest expense associated with discount on convertible loans
payable
|
14,706
|
14,706
|
|||||
Changes
in operating assets and liabilities:
|
|||||||
Accounts
receivable
|
321,492
|
(337,524
|
)
|
||||
Inventory
|
(323,913
|
)
|
732,418
|
||||
Other
current assets
|
(325,808
|
)
|
(101,832
|
)
|
|||
Accounts
payable
|
(226,647
|
)
|
(805,127
|
)
|
|||
Accrued
interest
|
142,214
|
223,263
|
|||||
Accrued
salaries and other expenses
|
(601,534
|
)
|
(549,285
|
)
|
|||
Deferred
revenue
|
400,880
|
238,559
|
|||||
Total
adjustments
|
1,036,365
|
783,719
|
|
||||
Net
cash provided by (used for) operating activities
|
2,977,110
|
(609,829
|
)
|
||||
Cash flows from investing activities: | |||||||
Additions
to property and equipment
|
(198,348
|
)
|
(368,250
|
)
|
|||
Net
cash used for investing activities
|
(198,348
|
)
|
(368,250
|
)
|
|||
Cash
flows from financing activities:
|
|||||||
Issuance
of common stock for cash
|
251,472
|
1,146,445
|
|||||
Payment
of convertible notes payable
|
(258,906
|
)
|
-
|
||||
Payment
of note payable
|
-
|
(375,000
|
)
|
||||
Net
cash (used for) provided by financing activities
|
(7,434
|
)
|
771,445
|
||||
Increase
(decrease) in cash and equivalents
|
2,771,328
|
(206,634
|
)
|
||||
Cash
and equivalents, beginning of period
|
4,348,729
|
3,623,404
|
|||||
Cash
and equivalents, end of period
|
$
|
7,120,057
|
$
|
3,416,770
|
|||
Supplemental
disclosure of cash flow information:
|
|||||||
Interest
paid
|
$
|
55,598
|
$
|
8,743
|
|||
Non-cash
items from investing and financing activities:
|
|||||||
Conversion
of convertible notes payable into Common Stock
|
$
|
2,500,000
|
$
|
-
|
|||
Accrued
dividends on convertible preferred stock
|
$
|
-
|
$ | 55,880 |
See
accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
5
iCAD,
INC.
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
June
30, 2008
(1) |
Basis
of Presentation and Significant Accounting
Policies
|
Reference
should be made to iCAD, Inc.'s (“iCAD”, “Company”, “we”, “our” or “us”) Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 for a comprehensive
summary of significant accounting policies.
The
accompanying consolidated financial statements of the Company have been prepared
in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States
of America. In the opinion of management, these unaudited interim consolidated
financial statements reflect all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring
adjustments, necessary for a fair presentation of the financial position at
June
30, 2008, the results of operations for the three and six month periods ended
June 30, 2008 and 2007, and cash flows for the six month periods ended June
30,
2008 and 2007. Although the Company believes that the disclosures in these
financial statements are adequate to make the information presented not
misleading, certain information normally included in the footnotes prepared
in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States
of
America has been omitted as permitted by the rules and regulations of the
Securities and Exchange Commission. The accompanying financial statements should
be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements and notes thereto
included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10−K for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2007 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March
17,
2008. The results for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2008 are
not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the fiscal
year ending December 31, 2008, or any future period. Interim period amounts
are
not necessarily indicative of the results of operations for the full fiscal
year.
(2) |
Financing
Arrangements
|
Loan
and Security Agreement
On
June
30, 2008, the Company entered into a Loan and Security Agreement (the “RBS Loan
Agreement”) with RBS Citizens, N.A. (“RBS”). The Loan Agreement replaces the
prior Revolving
Loan and Security Agreement (the "Prior Loan Agreement") with Mr. Robert Howard,
the Company’s former Chairman of the Board of Directors. The
RBS
Loan Agreement established a secured revolving credit facility with a line
of
credit of up to $5,000,000. The borrowing base under the RBS Loan Agreement
is
limited to 80% of eligible accounts receivable. As of June 30, 2008, the Company
had approximately $4,700,000 of available borrowing capacity. Unless earlier
repaid, all amounts due and owing under the RBS Loan Agreement are required
to
be repaid on June 30, 2009, the stated termination date of the RBS Loan
Agreement.
6
iCAD,
INC.
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
June
30, 2008
(2) |
Financing
Arrangements (continued)
|
Loan
and Security Agreement (continued)
The
RBS
Loan Agreement contains certain financial and non-financial covenants relating
to the Company. The RBS Loan Agreement also contains certain events of default.
Amounts due under the RBS Loan Agreement and the related Revolving Note (the
“Revolving Note”) dated June 30, 2008, may be prepaid at any time, in whole or
in part, at the option of the Company, provided, however, that for any portion
of the loan accruing interest as a “LIBOR Rate Loan” (as defined in the RBS Loan
Agreement), the Company is responsible to pay any LIBOR Breakage Fee as defined
and further described in the Revolving Note. All amounts outstanding under
the
RBS Loan Agreement and the associated Revolving Note will bear interest, at
the
Company’s option, at a fluctuating per annum rate of interest equal to (i) Prime
Rate (as defined in the Revolving Note) plus one-half of one percent or (ii)
the
Adjusted LIBOR Rate (as defined in the Revolving Note) plus the LIBOR Rate
Margin (as defined in the Revolving Note).
In
connection with the RBS Loan Agreement and the Revolving Note, the Company
has
entered into a Negative Pledge Agreement dated June 30, 2008. Pursuant to the
Negative Pledge Agreement, the Company agreed, among other things, (i) not
to
incur any liens, other than as permitted under the RBS Loan Agreement, with
respect to the Company’s intellectual property and (ii) not to sell or assign,
other than for fair consideration in the ordinary course of business, the
Company’s intellectual property. In addition, the Company assigned all its
assets to RBS wherever located and whether now owned or hereafter acquired,
including, without limitation, all inventory, machinery, equipment, fixtures
and
other goods.
Convertible
Revolving Loan Payable to Related Party
The
Company had a Revolving Loan and Security Agreement (the "Prior Loan Agreement")
with Mr. Robert Howard, the former Chairman of the Board of Directors of the
Company, under which Mr. Howard had agreed to advance funds, or to provide
guarantees of advances made by third parties in an amount up to $5,000,000.
As
a
condition to, and simultaneously with, the execution of the RBS Loan Agreement,
on June 30, 2008, the unpaid principal amount and accrued interest of the Prior
Loan Agreement, was extinguished as follows: (1) a total of $2,000,000 principal
amount under the Prior Loan Agreement, together with $351,917 of accrued and
unpaid interest on such principal amount, was converted by Mr. Howard into
1,622,012 shares of the Company’s common stock at $1.45 per share and (2) the
remaining principal balance under the Prior Loan Agreement of $258,906, together
with accrued and unpaid interest of $55,598 on such principal amount, was paid
in cash to Mr. Howard. The outstanding indebtedness under the Prior Loan
Agreement has therefore, been fully repaid and satisfied and the Prior Loan
Agreement was terminated as of June 30, 2008.
7
iCAD,
INC.
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
June
30, 2008
(2) |
Financing
Arrangements (continued)
|
Convertible
Loans Payable to Related Parties
On
June
19, 2006, the Company and Dr. Lawrence Howard, who subsequently became Director
and is currently the Chairman of the Board of Director of the Company, entered
into a Note Purchase Agreement with respect to the purchase by Dr. Howard from
the Company of an aggregate of $200,000 principal amount of a 7% Convertible
Note of the Company due June 19, 2008 (the “Howard Note”) at a purchase price of
$200,000. Interest on the Howard Note was payable on the due date. On June
19,
2008, the $200,000 principal amount under the Howard Note, together with $28,000
of accrued and unpaid interest on such principal amount, was converted by Dr.
Howard into 152,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at $1.50 per share.
The
Howard Note has, therefore, been fully repaid and satisfied and was terminated
as of June 19, 2008.
On
June
20, 2006, the Company and Mr. Kenneth Ferry, the Company’s Chief Executive
Officer, entered into a Note Purchase Agreement with respect to the purchase
by
Mr. Ferry from the Company of an aggregate of $300,000 principal amount of
a 7%
Convertible Note of the Company due June 20, 2008 (the “Ferry Note”) at a
purchase price of $300,000. Interest on the Ferry Note was payable on the due
date. On June 20, 2008, the $300,000 principal amount under the Ferry Note,
together with $42,000 of accrued and unpaid interest on such principal amount,
was converted by Mr. Ferry into 228,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at
$1.50 per share. The
Ferry
Note has, therefore, been fully repaid and satisfied and was terminated as
of
June 20, 2008.
On
September 12, 14 and 19, 2006 the Company entered into Note Purchase Agreements
with respect to the purchase from the Company of a total of $2,300,000 principal
amount of its 7.25% Convertible Promissory Notes (the “Notes”) by directors,
officers and employees of the Company, including the following: Mr. Robert
Howard (as to $1,350,000), former Chairman of the Board and director of the
Company, Mr. James Harlan (as to $300,000), former director of the Company
and
Dr. Elliott Sussman (as to $100,000), director of the Company, Mr. Steven
Rappaport (as to $300,000) who subsequently became and is currently a director
of the Company and Dr. Lawrence Howard (as to $100,000) who subsequently became
a director and is currently Chairman of the Board and director of the Company,
and $50,000 by each of the following executive officers and/or employees of
the
Company: Mr. Jeffrey Barnes, Ms. Stacey Stevens and Ms. Annette Heroux. The
Notes are due two years from the date of issue subject to the right of the
Company to prepay the Notes and the right of the holders of the Notes to
accelerate payment of their respective Notes upon the Company filing for or
being adjudicated bankrupt or insolvent. The holders
8
iCAD,
INC.
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
June
30, 2008
(2) |
Financing
Arrangements (continued)
|
Convertible
Loans Payable to Related Parties (continued)
of
the
Notes may convert the principal and accrued and unpaid interest under the Notes
into shares of the Company’s common stock at a price of $1.70 per share, which
conversion price is subject to adjustment under certain circumstances such
as
common stock splits, or combinations or common stock dividends. The Note issued
to Mr. Steven Rappaport on September 19, 2006 in the principal amount of
$300,000 was issued with a conversion price below the market price of $1.80
per
share on the date of the Note and the Company recorded a discount to Note
Payables of $17,647 to reflect the beneficial conversion feature. This loan
is
recorded on the balance sheet at its face value net of the discount at June
30,
2008 of $2,206 at $297,794.
Convertible
Loans Payable to Non-Related Parties
On
September 19, 2006 the Company entered into Note Purchase Agreements with
respect to the purchase from the Company of an aggregate of $700,000 principal
amount of its 7.25% Convertible Promissory Note (the “September Notes”) by two
accredited outside investors, pursuant to Note Purchase Agreements between
the
Company and each of the investors. The loans are evidenced by the September
Notes issued by the Company in favor of the non-related parties. The September
Notes mature two years from the date of issue subject to the right of the
Company to prepay the September Notes and the right of the holders of the
September Notes to accelerate payment of their respective September Notes upon
the Company filing for or being adjudicated bankrupt or insolvent. The holders
of the September Notes may convert the principal and accrued and unpaid interest
under the September Notes into shares of the Company’s common stock at a price
of $1.70 per share, which conversion price is subject to adjustment under
certain circumstances such as common stock splits, or combinations or common
stock dividends. The September Notes issued on September 19, 2006 in the
aggregate principal amount of $700,000 were issued with a conversion price
below
the market price of $1.80 per share on the date of the September Notes and
the
Company recorded a discount to Note Payables of $41,177 to reflect the
beneficial conversion feature. These loans are recorded on the balance sheet
at
June 30, 2008 at $694,853, which represents their face value net of the discount
of $5,147.
9
iCAD,
INC.
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
June
30, 2008
(3) |
Earning
per Share
|
The
Company’s basic earnings per share is computed by dividing net profit or loss
available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of shares of
common stock outstanding for the period and, if there are dilutive securities,
diluted earnings per share is computed by including common stock equivalents
outstanding for the period in the denominator. Common stock equivalents include
shares issuable upon the exercise of stock options, convertible notes and
warrants, net of shares assumed to have been purchased with the proceeds, using
the treasury stock method. A summary of the Company’s calculation of
earnings per share is as follows:
Three Months Ended
June 30,
|
Six Months Ended
June 30,
|
||||||||||||
2008
|
2007
|
2008
|
2007
|
||||||||||
Net
income (loss)
|
$
|
2,386,598
|
$
|
(839,611
|
)
|
$
|
1,940,745
|
$
|
(1,393,548
|
)
|
|||
Less
preferred dividends
|
-
|
(26,830
|
)
|
(55,880
|
)
|
||||||||
Net
income (loss) available to common shareholders - basic
|
$
|
2,386,598
|
$
|
(866,441
|
)
|
$
|
1,940,745
|
$
|
(1,449,428
|
)
|
|||
Add
interest relating to convertible loans payable
|
79,893
|
-
|
173,570
|
-
|
|||||||||
Net
income (loss) available to common shareholders - diluted
|
$
|
2,470,696
|
$
|
(866,441
|
)
|
$
|
2,123,450
|
$
|
(1,449,428
|
)
|
|||
Basic
shares used in the calculation of earnings per share
|
39,308,978
|
38,035,094
|
39,240,427
|
37,755,330
|
|||||||||
Effect
of dilutive securities:
|
|||||||||||||
Stock
options
|
1,545,516
|
-
|
1,180,134
|
-
|
|||||||||
Restricted
stock
|
58,834
|
-
|
14,705
|
-
|
|||||||||
Convertible
loans payable
|
3,722,168
|
-
|
3,744,443
|
-
|
|||||||||
Stock
warrants
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||
Diluted
shares used in the calculation of earnings per share
|
44,635,496
|
38,035,094
|
44,179,709
|
37,755,330
|
|||||||||
Net
income (loss) per share :
|
|||||||||||||
Basic
|
$
|
0.06
$
|
(0.02
|
)
|
$
|
0.05
$
|
(0.04
|
)
|
|||||
Diluted
|
$
|
0.06
$
|
(0.02
|
)
|
$
|
0.05
$
|
(0.04
|
)
|
The
following table summarizes the number of shares of common stock for securities
that were not included in the calculation of diluted net income (loss) per
share because such shares are antidilutive:
Three
Months Ended
|
Six
Months Ended
|
||||||||||||
June
30,
|
June
30,
|
||||||||||||
2008
|
2007
|
2008
|
2007
|
||||||||||
Stock
options
|
1,813,655
|
5,057,362
|
1,988,844
|
5,057,362
|
|||||||||
Restricted
stock
|
-
|
-
|
855,000
|
-
|
|||||||||
Stock
warrants
|
1,003,311
|
1,003,311
|
1,003,311
|
1,003,311
|
|||||||||
Convertible
Revolving Promissory Note
|
-
|
1,441,848
|
-
|
1,441,848
|
|||||||||
Convertible
loans payable
|
-
|
2,098,039
|
-
|
2,098,039
|
|||||||||
Convertible
Series A Preferred Stock
|
-
|
460,000
|
-
|
460,000
|
|||||||||
Convertible
Series B Preferred Stock
|
-
|
527,500
|
-
|
527,500
|
|||||||||
2,816,966
|
10,588,060
|
3,847,155
|
10,588,060
|
10
iCAD,
INC.
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
June
30, 2008
(4) |
Stock-Based
Compensation
|
The
Company follows the provisions of
Statement No. 123R, Share-Based
Payment
(“SFAS
123R”)
and
Staff Accounting Bulletin 107 ("SAB 107") for all share-based compensation
that
was not vested as of January 1, 2006. The Company adopted SFAS No. 123R
using a modified prospective application, as permitted under SFAS No. 123R.
Accordingly, prior period amounts have not been restated. Under this
application, the Company is required to record compensation expense for all
awards granted after the date of adoption and for the unvested portion of
previously granted awards that remain outstanding at the date of adoption.
The
Company issued 351,123 stock options and 533,250 shares of restricted stock
in
the six months ended June 30, 2008. The options granted during the six months
of
2008 had a weighted average exercise price of $2.17. The weighted average fair
value of options granted during the six month period ended June 30, 2008 was
$0.95 and was estimated on the grant date using the Black-Scholes option-pricing
model with the following weighted average assumptions: expected volatility
of
62.8%, expected term of 3.5 years, risk-free interest rate of 2.98%, and
expected dividend yield of 0%. Expected volatility is based on peer group
volatility, also using the Company’s historical volatility within the peer
group. The average expected life was calculated using the simplified method
under SAB 107. The risk-free rate is based on the rate of
U.S.
Treasury zero-coupon issues with a remaining term equal to the expected life
of
option grants. The Company recorded
$816,643 for share-based compensation in accordance with SFAS 123R.
For
the
same period in 2007, the
Company issued 363,056 stock options. The options granted during the first
six
months of 2007 had a weighted average exercise price of $3.88. The weighted
average fair value of options granted during the six month period ended June
30,
2007 was $1.85 and was estimated on the grant date using the Black-Scholes
option-pricing model with the following weighted average assumptions: expected
volatility of 62.8%, expected term of 3.5 years, risk-free interest rate of
4.70%, and expected dividend yield of 0%. Expected volatility was based on
peer
group volatility, also using the Company’s historical volatility within the peer
group. The average expected life was calculated using the simplified method
under SAB 107. The risk-free rate is based on the rate of
U.S.
Treasury zero-coupon issues with a remaining term equal to the expected life
of
option grants. The Company recorded
$492,608 for share-based compensation in accordance with SFAS 123R.
As
of
June 30, 2008 there was approximately
$4,059,958 of
total
unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested options and restricted stock.
That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period
of three years.
11
iCAD,
INC.
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
June
30, 2008
(5) |
Fair
Value Measurements
|
Effective
January 1, 2008, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards (“SFAS”) No. 157, “Fair
Value Measurements”
(“SFAS
157”). In February 2008, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”)
issued FASB Staff Position, FAS 157-2, “Effective Date of FASB Statement
No. 157”, which provides a one year deferral of the effective date of SFAS
157 for non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities, except those that
are recognized or disclosed in the financial statements at fair value at least
annually. Therefore, the Company has adopted the provisions of SFAS 157 with
respect to its financial assets and liabilities only. SFAS 157, establishes
a
framework for measuring fair value under generally accepted accounting
principles and enhances disclosures about fair value measurements. Fair value
is
defined under SFAS 157 as the exchange price that would be received for an
asset
or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most
advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between
market participants on the measurement date. Valuation techniques used to
measure fair value under SFAS 157 must maximize the use of observable inputs
and
minimize the use of unobservable inputs. The standard describes a fair value
hierarchy based on three levels of inputs, of which the first two are considered
observable and the last unobservable, that may be used to measure fair value
which are the following:
§
|
Level
1- Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or
liabilities.
|
§
|
Level
2 - Inputs other than Level 1 that are observable, either directly
or
indirectly, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities;
quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that
are
observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for
substantially the full term of the assets or
liabilities.
|
§
|
Level
3 - Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market
activity
and that are significant to the fair
value
|
A
financial instrument’s level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the
lowest level of any input that is significant to the fair value measurement.
12
iCAD,
INC.
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
June
30, 2008
(5) |
Fair
Value Measurements (continued)
|
The
adoption of this statement did not have a material impact on the Company’s
consolidated results of operations and financial condition.
In
accordance with SFAS 157, the Company’s financial assets that are measured at
fair value on a recurring basis as of June 30, 2008 are cash equivalents. The
cash equivalents are measured using level one inputs.
(6) |
Commitments
and Contingencies
|
In
July
2007, a dissolved former Canadian subsidiary of the Company, CADx Medical
Systems Inc. (“CADx Medical”), received a tax re-assessment of approximately
$6,800,000 from the Canada Revenue Agency (“CRA”) resulting from CRA’s audit of
CADx Medical’s Canadian federal tax return for the year ended December 31, 2002.
The Company believes that it will not be liable for the re-assessment against
CADx Medical and no accrual was recorded as of June 30, 2008. The Company
responded to the notice outlining its grounds of objection with respect to
the
re-assessment. The CRA responded acknowledging receipt of the correspondence
and
advised that they intend to schedule a review on the matter.
(7) |
Income
Taxes
|
Effective
January 1, 2007, the Company adopted the provisions of FASB Interpretation
No.
48, "Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes—an interpretation of FASB
Statement No. 109" ("FIN 48"). At June 30, 2008, the Company had no material
unrecognized tax benefits and no adjustments to liabilities or operations were
required under FIN 48. The Company does not expect that the unrecognized tax
benefits will materially increase within the next twelve months. The Company
did
not recognize any interest or penalties related to uncertain tax positions
at
June 30, 2008. The Company files United States federal income tax returns and
income tax returns in various state and local jurisdictions. The Company
currently is not under examination by the Internal Revenue Service or other
jurisdictions for any tax years. The Company’s effective income tax rate was 6%
for the six months
13
iCAD,
INC.
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
June
30, 2008
(7) |
Income
Taxes (continued)
|
ended
June 30, 2008 and no income tax expense was provided for the six month period
ended June 30, 2007. The effective income tax rate is based upon the estimated
income for the year. For the six month period ended June 30, 2008, the effective
tax rate varied from the statutory tax rate principally due to federal and
state
net operating loss carryforwards available.
(8) |
Subsequent
Events
|
On
July
18, 2008, the Company completed
the acquisition of substantially all of the assets of 3TP LLC dba CAD Sciences,
a New York limited liability company (the “Seller”)
pursuant
to an Asset Purchase Agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”) dated June 20, 2008
between the Company and the Seller.
In
accordance with the terms of the Purchase Agreement, the purchase price of
$5,000,000 paid by the Company to the Seller consisted of (i) $2,000,000 in
cash
and (ii) $3,000,000 in stock comprised of 1,086,957 restricted shares of the
Company’s common stock (“Shares”).
Simultaneously
with the closing of the transactions contemplated by the Purchase Agreement,
the
Company entered into an Escrow Agreement by and among the Company, the Seller
and U.S. Bank National Association (the “Escrow Agreement”) pursuant to which
271,740 of the Shares were deposited by the parties into an escrow account
for a
period of up to one year to secure the Seller’s indemnity obligations to the
Company under the Purchase Agreement. The Escrow Agreement provides that, of
the
escrowed Shares, 181,160 Shares will be held in escrow for 6 months and the
remaining escrow Shares will be held in escrow for one year, in each case
subject to earlier disbursement (in accordance with the terms of the Escrow
Agreement) to the Company in satisfaction of any indemnification obligations
arising under the terms of the Purchase Agreement.
14
Item
2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results
of
Operations
"Safe
Harbor" Statement under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of
1995:
Certain
information included in this Item 2 and elsewhere in this Form 10-Q that are
not
historical facts contain forward looking statements that involve a number of
known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that could cause the
actual results, performance or achievements of the Company to be materially
different from any future results, performance or achievement expressed or
implied by such forward looking statements. These risks and uncertainties
include, but are not limited to, uncertainty of future sales levels, protection
of patents and other proprietary rights, the impact of supply and manufacturing
constraints or difficulties, product market acceptance, possible technological
obsolescence of products, increased competition, litigation and/or government
regulation, changes in Medicare reimbursement policies, competitive factors,
the
effects of a decline in the economy in markets served by the Company and other
risks detailed in the Company’s other filings with the Securities and Exchange
Commission. The words “believe”, “demonstrate”, “intend”, “expect”, “estimate”,
“anticipate”, “likely”, “seek”, “should” and similar expressions identify
forward-looking statements. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance
on
those forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date the statement
was made.
Results
of Operations
Overview
iCAD
is
an industry-leading provider of computer aided detection solutions (“CAD”) that
enable radiologists and other healthcare professionals to better serve patients
by identifying pathologies and pinpointing cancer earlier. Early detection
of
cancer is the key to better prognosis, less invasive and lower treatment costs,
and higher survival rates. Performed as an adjunct to mammography screening,
CAD
has quickly become the standard of care in breast cancer detection, helping
radiologists improve clinical outcomes while enhancing workflow. CAD for
mammography screening is also reimbursable in the United States under federal
and most third-party insurance programs. Since receiving FDA approval for the
Company’s first breast cancer detection product in January 2002, over twenty two
hundred of our CAD systems have been placed in mammography practices worldwide.
iCAD is the only stand alone company offering CAD solutions for the early
detection of breast cancer.
In
late
2005, the Company began to see a shift in sales from its film based analog
CAD
technology to its digital CAD technology. This shift has been primarily fueled
by the results reported in 2005 in the New England Journal of Medicine from
the
American College of Radiology Imaging Network’s (ACRIN) Digital Mammographic
Imaging Screening Trial (DMIST). The trial showed that there was no difference
in accuracy between the two modalities for screening asymptomatic women in
general. But for three subgroups of women (which represent over 60% of the
population), digital mammography performed better than film-based analog
mammography. Additionally, digital mammography offers better clinical images
combined with significant workflow improvements for the radiologist. CAD
technology is more often purchased for use with digital mammography equipment
than is purchased for use with analog mammography equipment. The Company
believes that the shift to digital CAD technology will continue and as such
it
will continue to have a positive impact on the Company’s overall financial
performance, primarily because as the number of facilities converting to full
field digital mammography systems continues to grow, the recent release of
the
Company’s CAD product for use with Computed Radiography (CR), and the Company
expects to realize higher revenue of its digital products due to the higher
adoption rate of digital CAD technology as compared to analog CAD technology
and
from higher gross margins realized on the Company’s digital
products.
15
iCAD’s
CAD products have been shown to detect up to 72 percent of the cancers that
biopsy proved were missed on the previous mammogram, an average of 15 months
earlier. Our advanced pattern recognition technology analyzes images to identify
patterns and then uses sophisticated mathematical analysis to mark suspicious
areas.
The
Company intends to apply its core competencies in pattern recognition and
algorithm development in disease detection. Our focus is on the development
and
marketing of cancer detection products for disease states where there are
established or emerging protocols for screening as a standard of care. iCAD
expects to pursue development of products for select disease states where it
is
clinically proven that screening has a significant positive impact on patient
outcomes, where there is an opportunity to lower health care costs, where
screening is non-invasive or minimally invasive and where public awareness
is
high. Virtual colonoscopy (CTC) is a technology that has evolved rapidly in
recent years. We expect that the market for virtual colonoscopy will grow.
The
anticipated growth is due to the increased demand for the procedures for early
detection of colon cancer, combined with the recent results of the National
CT
Colonography Trial demonstrating that CTC is highly accurate for the detection
of intermediate and large polyps and that the accuracy of CTC is similar to
colonoscopy. CT Colonography or CTC is emerging as an alternative imaging
procedure for evaluation of the colon. The Company is developing a product
for
computer aided detection of polyps in the colon using CTC and is currently
in
clinical trials. Colorectal cancer has been shown to be highly preventable
with early detection and removal of polyps.
The
Company’s CAD systems include proprietary algorithm technology together with
standard computer and display equipment. CAD systems for the film-based analog
mammography market also include a radiographic film digitizer, manufactured
by
the Company and others for the digitization of film-based medical images. The
Company’s headquarters are located in southern New Hampshire, with manufacturing
and contract manufacturing facilities in New Hampshire and Massachusetts and
research and development facilities in Ohio and with the acquisition of CAD
Sciences also in New York.
Critical
Accounting Policies
The
Company’s discussion and analysis of its financial condition, results of
operations, and cash flows are based on our consolidated financial statements,
which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States. The preparation of these financial statements
requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts
of
assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent
assets and liabilities. On an on-going basis, we evaluate these estimates,
including those related to accounts receivable allowance, inventory valuation
and obsolescence, intangible assets, income taxes, warranty obligations,
contingencies and litigation. Additionally, we use assumptions and estimates
in
calculations to determine stock-based compensation. We base our estimates on
historical experience and on various other assumptions that we believe to be
reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for
making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are
not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these
estimates under different assumptions or conditions.
16
The Company’s critical accounting policies are set forth in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007. The Company believes that revenue recognition is a critical accounting policy because it is governed by multiple complex accounting rules, however there are no significant estimates or assumptions used in recording the Company’s revenue.
Quarter
Ended June 30, 2008 compared to Quarter Ended June 30, 2007 and Six Months
Ended
June 30, 2008 compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2007
Revenue.
Revenue
for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2008 was $10,549,489 and
$16,981,505, respectively, compared with revenue of $6,104,736 and $12,252,222
for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2007. In the six month period
ended June 30, 2008, sales of iCAD’s digital solutions increased $4,832,361 or
65.2% to $12,247,611, compared to sales of $7,415,250 in the six month period
in
2007.
The
increase in revenue for the six month period ended June 30, 2008, was due
primarily to the substantial increase in digital CAD revenue during the second
quarter 2008. The Company’s digital revenue for the second quarter of 2008
increased $4,000,065 or 101.0%, to $7,961,945, compared to sales of $3,961,880
in the same period in 2007. These increases are due primarily to the release,
during the second quarter of 2008, of the Company’s SecondLook Digital CAD for
sale with Fujifilm Computed Radiography for Mammography (“FCRm”)
systems, as well as an increase in business from the Company’s other OEM
customers due to the continued increased global demand for Full Field Digital
Mammography (FFDM) systems and digital CAD technology for the detection of
breast cancer.
On
April
4, 2008 the Company announced that its SecondLook®
Digital
CAD system for mammography received approval from the U.S. Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) for sale with Fuji’s
FCRm
systems.
SecondLook Digital for
FCRm
is the
first CAD product approved and available in the U.S. for use with computer
radiography.
Sales
of
iCAD’s film based product revenue increased 31.7% or $413,328 in the second
quarter of 2008, to $1,715,180 in 2008 compared to $1,301,852 in the second
quarter of 2007, and a decrease of 1.1% or $35,019 for the six month period
ended June 30, 2008, to $3,084,137 in 2008, compared to $3,119,156 in the same
period of 2007. While the transition to digital technology has a significant
positive impact on overall performance, the film based products are a mature
product line. However, film based product revenue has benefited from demand
for
the Company’s TotalLook product that is used for digitizing film based prior
mammography exams for comparative reading with current mammography exams. In
addition, a new version of the Company’s TotalLook product, the TotalLook Mammo
Advantage, was introduced late in the first quarter of 2008 and the Company
has
received favorable customer feedback to this product in the second quarter
of
2008.
17
Service
and supply revenue increased 3.7% in the second quarter of 2008, to $872,364
compared to $841,004 in the second quarter in 2007 and decreased 4.0% or
$68,059, from $1,717,816 to $1,649,757 for the six month period ended June
30,
2008, compared to the same six month period in 2007. The decrease in the
Company’s service revenue for the six month period ended June 30, 2008 is due
primarily to a reduction in time and material billings for repair services
and
related parts sales due in part to certain of its older film based analog
products no longer being supported, offset by increased service contract revenue
on the Company’s digital and TotalLook products.
Three
months ended June 30,
|
|||||||||||||
2008
|
2007
|
Change
|
% Change
|
||||||||||
Digital
revenue
|
$
|
7,961,945
|
$
|
3,961,880
|
$
|
4,000,065
|
101.0
|
%
|
|||||
Analog
revenue
|
1,715,180
|
1,301,852
|
413,328
|
31.7
|
%
|
||||||||
Service
& supply revenue
|
872,364
|
841,004
|
31,360
|
3.7
|
%
|
||||||||
Total
revenue
|
$
|
10,549,489
|
$
|
6,104,736
|
$
|
4,444,753
|
72.8
|
%
|
Six
months ended June 30,
|
|||||||||||||
2008
|
2007
|
Change
|
% Change
|
||||||||||
Digital
revenue
|
$
|
12,247,611
|
$
|
7,415,250
|
$
|
4,832,361
|
65.2
|
%
|
|||||
Analog
revenue
|
3,084,137
|
3,119,156
|
(35,019
|
)
|
-1.1
|
%
|
|||||||
Service
& supply revenue
|
1,649,757
|
1,717,816
|
(68,059
|
)
|
-4.0
|
%
|
|||||||
Total
revenue
|
$
|
16,981,505
|
$
|
12,252,222
|
$
|
4,729,283
|
38.6
|
%
|
Gross
Margin. Gross
margin increased to 83.6% and 83.1% for the three and six month periods ended
June 30, 2008 compared to 80.0% and 80.2%, respectively, in the same three
and
six month periods in 2007. This 3.6% and 2.9% increase in gross margin for
the
three and six month periods of 2008 is primarily attributable to increased
volume of the Company’s digital products which have a higher gross margin than
its film based products which include more hardware components and the
realization of some component cost reductions.
Engineering
and Product Development. Engineering
and product development costs for the three and six month periods ended June
30,
2008 increased by $370,171 or 32.7% and $714,505 or 32.5%, respectively, from
$1,133,424 and $2,198,299 in 2007 to $1,503,595 and $2,912,804, respectively,
in
2008. The increase in engineering and product development costs during the
three
and six month periods ended June 30, 2008 was primarily due to an increase
in
personnel and related costs of approximately $278,000 and $544,000,
respectively, resulting from staff increases to support the Company’s new
product development and approximately $106,000 and $131,000, respectively,
in
subcontracting services relating primarily to the clinical trials for its CT
Colon product.
18
Marketing and Sales. Marketing and sales expense for the three month period ended June 30, 2008 increased slightly by $16,020 or 0.6%, from $2,793,446 in 2007 to $2,809,466 in 2008. Marketing and sales expense for the six month period ended June 30, 2008 decreased $109,216 or 2.1%, from $5,302,205 in 2007 to $5,192,989 in 2008. The increase in marketing and sales expense for the three month period ending June 30, 2008, is primarily attributable to a $184,000 increase in personnel and related costs offset by primarily by a decrease of $108,000 in consulting and subcontracted services and $51,000 in travel expenses. The decrease in marketing and sales expense for the six month period ended June 30, 2008, primarily resulted from an increase in personnel and related expenses of $238,000 offset by decreases in consulting and subcontracted services of $198,000, warranty costs of $74,000, travel expenses of $42,000 and recruiting expenses of $33,000.
General
and Administrative. General
and administrative expenses for the three and six month periods ended June
30,
2008 increased by $245,940 or 14.6% and $280,931 or 8.0%, respectively, from
$1,689,951 and $3,503,306 in 2007 to $1,935,891 and $3,784,237 in 2008,
respectively. The increase in general and administrative expense during the
three month period ended June 30, 2008 was due primarily to an increase in
stock
based compensation expense of approximately $191,000 and increases in wage
related and fringe benefit expenses of $66,000. For the six month period ended
June 30, 2008 the increase was primarily due to an increase in stock based
compensation expense of approximately $327,000 and consulting and investor
relations expenses of $100,000, offset by a decrease in recruiting fees of
$79,000 and legal expense of $73,000.
Interest
Expense.
Net
interest expense for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2008
decreased from $109,333 and $215,139, respectively, in 2007 to $84,098 and
$182,705 in 2008. This decrease is due primarily to the decrease in the interest
rate on the Company’s Prior Loan Agreement with Mr. Robert Howard which bore
interest at the prime rate plus 1%. The interest rate decreased from
approximately 9.25% in the first six months of 2007 to approximately 6.25%
in
the comparable period of 2008.
Provision
for Income Taxes. The
provision for income taxes of $96,000 for the 2008 periods, consists of an
estimate for federal alternative minimum tax expense and various state income
taxes based upon the estimated effective income tax rate for the full fiscal
year.
Net
Income/(Loss). As
a
result of the foregoing, the Company recorded net income of $2,386,598 or $0.06
per basic share for the three month period ended June 30, 2008 on revenue of
$10,549,489 compared to a net loss of ($839,611) or ($0.02) per basic share
on
revenue of $6,104,736 for the three months ended June 30, 2007. The net income
for the six months ended June 30, 2008 was $1,940,745 or $0.05 per basic share
on revenue of $16,981,505, compared to a net loss of ($1,393,548) or ($0.04)
per
basic share on revenue of $12,252,222 for the six months ended June 30, 2007.
Backlog.
The
Company’s product backlog (excluding service and supplies) as of June 30, 2008
totaled approximately $2,665,716 as compared to $1,568,541 as of June 30, 2007
and $1,996,352 at March 31, 2008. It is expected that the majority of the
backlog at June 30, 2008 will be shipped within the current fiscal year. Backlog
as of any particular period should not be relied upon as indicative of the
Company’s net revenues for any future period as a large amount of the Company’s
product is booked and shipped within the same quarter.
19
Liquidity and Capital Resources
The
Company believes that its current liquidity and capital resources are sufficient
to sustain operations through at least the next 12 months, primarily due to
cash
expected to be generated from continuing operations, as well as the availability
of a credit line under the RBS Loan Agreement. The RBS Loan Agreement replaces
the Prior Revolving Loan and Security Agreement with Mr. Robert Howard, the
Company’s former Chairman of the Board of Directors, which was fully repaid and
terminated on June 30, 2008. The RBS Loan Agreement established a secured
revolving credit facility with a line of credit of up to $5,000,000. The
borrowing base under the RBS Loan Agreement is limited to 80% of eligible
accounts receivable. As of June 30, 2008, the Company had approximately
$4,700,000 of available borrowing capacity. Unless earlier repaid, all amounts
due and owing under the RBS Loan Agreement are required to be repaid on June
30,
2009, the stated termination date of the RBS Loan Agreement.
The
RBS
Loan Agreement contains certain financial and non-financial covenants relating
to the Company. The RBS Loan Agreement also contains certain events of default.
Amounts due under the RBS Loan Agreement and the related Revolving Note made
by
the Company in favor of RBS, may be prepaid at any time, in whole or in part,
at
the option of the Company, provided, however, that for any portion of the loan
accruing interest as a “LIBOR Rate Loan” (as defined the in the RBS Loan
Agreement), the Company is responsible to pay any LIBOR Breakage Fee as defined
and further described in the Revolving Note. All amounts outstanding under
the
RBS Loan Agreement and the associated Revolving Note will bear interest, at
the
Company’s option, at a fluctuating per annum rate of interest equal to (i) Prime
Rate (as defined in the Revolving Note) plus one-half of one percent or (ii)
the
Adjusted LIBOR Rate (as defined in the Revolving Note) plus the LIBOR Rate
Margin (as defined in the Revolving Note).
In
connection with the RBS Loan Agreement and the Revolving Note, the Company
has
entered into a Negative Pledge Agreement dated June 30, 2008 and made in favor
of RBS. Pursuant to the Negative Pledge Agreement, the Company agreed, among
other things, (i) not to incur any liens, other than as permitted under the
RBS
Loan Agreement, with respect to the Company’s intellectual property and (ii) not
to sell or assign, other than for fair consideration in the ordinary course
of
business, the Company’s intellectual property. In addition, the Company assigned
all its assets to RBS wherever located and whether now owned or hereafter
acquired, including, without limitation, all inventory, machinery, equipment,
fixtures and other goods.
The
Company's ability to generate cash adequate to meet its future capital
requirements will depend primarily on operating cash flow. If sales or cash
collections are reduced from current expectations, or if expenses and cash
requirements are increased, the Company may require additional financing.
At
June
30, 2008 the Company had current assets of $16,050,316, current liabilities
of
$9,399,530 and working capital of $6,650,786. The ratio of current assets to
current liabilities was 1.7:1
20
Net
cash
provided by operating activities for the six months ended June 30, 2008 was
$2,977,110, compared to net cash used of $609,829 for the same period in 2007.
The cash provided by operating activities for the six months ended June 30,
2008
resulted from the net income of $1,940,745, a decrease in accounts receivable
of
$321,492 and increases in accrued interest and deferred revenue totaling
$543,094, plus non-cash items including, depreciation, amortization, and
interest expense associated with discount on convertible loans payable of
$833,038 and stock based compensation of $816,643, offset by increases in
inventory of $323,913 and other current assets of $325,808, and a decrease
in
accounts payable of $226,647 and accrued expenses of $601,534.
The
net
cash used for investing activities, consisted of additions to property and
equipment for the six month period ended June 30, 2008, was $198,348 compared
to
$368,250 for the comparable period in 2007.
Net
cash
used for financing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2008 was $7,434,
compared to net cash provided by financing activities of $771,445 for the same
period in 2007. The cash used for financing activities during 2008 was due
to
cash received from the issuance of common stock relating to the exercise of
stock options and conversion of loans payable offset by the payment of the
convertible notes payable in the amount of $258,906.
Contractual
Obligations
The
following table summarizes, for the periods presented, the Company’s future
estimated cash payments under existing contractual obligations at June 30,
2008.
Contractual
Obligations
|
Payments
due by period
|
|||||||||||||||
Less
than 1
|
||||||||||||||||
Total
|
year
|
1-3
years
|
3-5
years
|
5+
years
|
||||||||||||
Convertible
loans payable to related parties
|
$
|
2,297,794
|
$
|
2,297,794
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
||||||
Convertible
loans payable to investors
|
$
|
694,853
|
$
|
694,853
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
||||||
Lease
Obligations*
|
$
|
1,390,653
|
$
|
224,767
|
$
|
945,566
|
$
|
220,320
|
$
|
-
|
||||||
Other
Obligations
|
$
|
21,505
|
$
|
21,505
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
||||||
Interest
Obligation**
|
$
|
435,000
|
$
|
435,000
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
||||||
Total
Contractual Obligations
|
$
|
4,839,805
|
$
|
3,673,919
|
$
|
945,566
|
$
|
220,320
|
$
|
-
|
*
The
Company’s lease obligations is shown net of sublease amounts.
**Represents
interest under the Convertible Promissory Note agreements at the rate of 7.25%.
21
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In
May
2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 162, The
Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles.
This
statement identifies the sources of accounting principles and the framework
for
selecting the principles to be used in the preparation of financial statements
that are presented in conformity with generally accepted accounting
principles in the United States. This statement is effective 60 days
following the SEC’s approval of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board
amendments to AU Section 411, The
Meaning of Present Fairly in Conformity with Generally Accepted Accounting
Principles.
We do
not expect SFAS No. 162 to have a material impact on our consolidated financial
statements.
On
January 1, 2008, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards (“SFAS”) No. 157, Fair Value Measurements. This Statement defines
fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value, and expands
disclosures about fair value measurements. It clarifies that fair value is
the
price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability
in
an orderly transaction between market participants in the market in which the
reporting entity transacts. This Statement does not require any new fair value
measurements, but rather, it provides enhanced guidance to other pronouncements
that require or permit assets or liabilities to be measured at fair value.
The
adoption of this standard only resulted in additional disclosure requirements
and had no impact on the Company’s financial condition or results of operation.
See Note 5 of the unaudited consolidated financial statements for further
information regarding the fair value of the Company’s financial
instruments.
In
December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141 (Revised 2007), “Business
Combinations” (“SFAS 141R”). SFAS 141R retains the fundamental requirements in
Statement 141 that the acquisition method of accounting (which Statement 141
called the purchase method) be used for all business combinations and for an
acquirer to be identified for each business combination. SFAS 141R requires
an
acquirer to recognize the assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, and any
non-controlling interest in the acquiree at the acquisition date, to be measured
at their fair values as of that date, with limited exceptions specified in
the
Statement. That replaces Statement 141’s cost-allocation process, which required
the cost of an acquisition to be allocated to the individual assets acquired
and
liabilities assumed based on their estimated fair values. SFAS 141R retains
the
guidance in Statement 141 for identifying and recognizing intangible assets
separately from goodwill. SFAS 141R will now require acquisition costs to be
expensed as incurred, restructuring costs associated with a business combination
must generally be expensed prior to the acquisition date and changes in deferred
tax asset valuation allowances and income tax uncertainties after the
acquisition date (including prior acquisitions) generally will affect income
tax
expense. SFAS 141R applies prospectively to business combinations for which
the
acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting
period beginning on or after December 15, 2008 except for income taxes, as
noted
above. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the adoption of SFAS
141R on its consolidated financial statements.
In
February 2007, the FASB issued Statement No. 159, “The Fair Value Option
for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities” (“SFAS 159”), including an
amendment of FASB Statement No. 115, which allows an entity to elect to
record financial assets and liabilities at fair value upon their initial
recognition on a contract-by-contract basis. Subsequent changes in fair value
would be recognized in earnings as the changes occur. SFAS 159 also
establishes additional disclosure requirements for these items stated at fair
value. SFAS 159 is effective as of the beginning of an entity’s first
fiscal year that begins after November 15, 2007. The Company did not elect
to adopt the fair value option under this statement.
22
Item
3. Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
Not
applicable.
Item 4. Controls
and Procedures
The
Company, under the supervision and with the participation of its management,
including its principal executive officer and principal financial officer,
evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of its disclosure
controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report.
Based on this evaluation, the principal executive officer and principal
financial officer concluded that the Company's disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934
(”Exchange Act”) were effective at the reasonable level of assurance.
A
control
system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable,
not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met.
Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are
resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative
to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems,
no
evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues
and instances of fraud, if any, within the Company have been detected. Because
of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system, misstatements
due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected. The Company conducts
periodic evaluations to enhance, where necessary its procedures and
controls.
The
Company’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer conducted
an evaluation of the Company's internal control over financial reporting (as
defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f)) to determine whether any changes in
internal control over financial reporting occurred during the quarter ended
June
30, 2008, that have materially affected or which are reasonably likely to
materially affect internal control over financial reporting. Based on that
evaluation, there has been no such change during such period.
PART
II OTHER INFORMATION
Item
2.
Unregistered
Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.
During
the quarter ended June 30, 2008 the Company issued the following shares of
its
unregistered common stock: (i) 1,622,012 shares to Mr. Robert Howard upon
conversion of amounts owed to him by the Company under the Prior Loan Agreement;
(ii) 152,000 shares to Dr. Lawrence Howard upon conversion of amounts owed
to
him by the Company under the Howard Note and (iii) 228,000 shares to Mr. Kenneth
Ferry upon conversion of amounts owed to him by the Company under the Ferry
Note. No commission or other remuneration was paid or given to any party for
soliciting the conversion of the amounts due under the Prior Loan Agreement,
the
Howard Note or the Ferry Note, all of the common stock issuances were made
in
private transactions and the certificates representing the shares contained
legends regarding restriction on transfer under the Securities Act of 1933
(“Act”). The shares of common stock were issued under exemptions from
registration under Sections 3(a)(9) and/or 4(2) of the Act.
23
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.
At
the
Company’s Annual Meeting of Stockholders held on June 17, 2008 the stockholders
of the Company entitled to vote at the meting voted to elect the seven
individuals named below to serve as directors of the Company to hold office
until the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held in 2009 and until their
successors have been duly elected and qualified.
The
votes
cast by stockholders with respect to the election of directors were as
follows:
Votes
Cast
|
Votes
|
|||
Director
|
"For"
|
Withheld
|
||
Dr.
Lawrence Howard
|
36,795,018
|
168,112
|
||
Kenneth
Ferry
|
36,862,077
|
101,053
|
||
Rachel
Brem, M.D.
|
35,747,592
|
1,215,538
|
||
Steven
Rappaport
|
36,721,663
|
241,467
|
||
Maha
Sallam
|
36,862,332
|
100,798
|
||
Elliot
Sussman, M.D.
|
35,747,792
|
1,215,338
|
||
Anthony
Ecock
|
36,868,077
|
95,053
|
Item
6.
Exhibits
Exhibit No.
|
Description
|
|
2.1*
|
Asset
Purchase Agreement dated as of June 20, 2008 between the Registrant
and
3TP LLC dba CAD Sciences(1)
|
|
10.1
|
Escrow
Agreement dated as of July 18, 2008 by and among the Registrant,
3TP LLC
dba CAD Sciences and U.S. Bank National Association (1)
|
|
Loan
and Security Agreement dated as of June 30, 2008 by and between the
Registrant and RBS Citizens, N.A. (2)
|
||
10.3
|
Revolving
Note dated as of June 30, 2008 made by the Registrant in favor of
RBS
Citizens, N.A. (2)
|
|
10.4
|
Negative
Pledge Agreement dated June 30, 2008 by the Registrant as accepted
by RBS
Citizens, N.A.(2)
|
24
10.5
|
Employment
Agreement entered into as of June 1, 2008 between the Registrant
and Kenneth Ferry.
|
|
10.6
|
Employment
Agreement entered into as of June 1, 2008 between the Registrant
and
Darlene Deptula-Hicks.
|
|
10.7
|
Employment
Agreement entered into as of June 1, 2008 between the Registrant
and
Jeffrey Barnes.
|
|
10.8
|
Employment
Agreement entered into as of June 1, 2008 between the Registrant
and
Stacey Stevens.
|
|
10.9
|
Employment
Agreement entered into as of June 1, 2008 between the Registrant
and
Jonathan Go.
|
|
|
||
31.1
|
Certification
of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002.
|
|
31.2
|
Certification
of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002.
|
|
32.1
|
Certification
of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002.
|
|
32.2
|
|
Certification
of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002.
|
(1)
Incorporated by reference to the exhibit filed with the Registrant’s Current
Report on Form 8-K for the event dated July 18, 2008.
(2)
Incorporated by reference to the exhibit filed with the Registrant’s Current
Report on Form 8-K for the event dated June 30, 2008.
*
The Registrant has omitted certain schedules and exhibits pursuant to Item
601(b)(2) of Regulation S-K and shall furnish supplementally to the SEC copies
any of the omitted schedules and exhibits upon request by the SEC.
25
Signatures
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant
has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto
duly authorized.
|
iCAD,
Inc.
|
|||
(Registrant)
|
||||
Date: August
8, 2008
|
By:
|
/s/
Kenneth M. Ferry
|
||
Kenneth
M. Ferry
|
||||
President,
Chief Executive Officer,
|
||||
|
Director
|
|||
Date: August 8,
2008
|
By:
|
/s/
Darlene M. Deptula-Hicks
|
||
Darlene
M. Deptula-Hicks
|
||||
Executive
Vice President of Finance
|
||||
and
Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer
|
26