ICAD INC - Quarter Report: 2015 March (Form 10-Q)

Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2015

OR

For the transition period from                      to                     

Commission file number 001-09341

iCAD, Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

(603) 882-5200

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Not Applicable

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirement for the past 90 days.    YES  x    NO  ¨.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    YES  x    NO  ¨.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act)    YES  ¨    NO  x.

As of the close of business on May 5, 2015 there were 15,669,239 shares outstanding of the registrant’s Common Stock, $.01 par value.

Table of Contents

iCAD, Inc.

INDEX

2

Table of Contents

iCAD, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets

(Unaudited)

(In thousands except for share data)

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

3

Table of Contents

iCAD, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations

(Unaudited)

(In thousands except for per share data)

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

4

Table of Contents

iCAD, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(unaudited)

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

5

Table of Contents

iCAD, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

March 31, 2015

Note 1 - Basis of Presentation and Significant Accounting Policies

The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements of iCAD, Inc. and subsidiaries (“iCAD” or the “Company”) have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“US GAAP”). In the opinion of management, these unaudited interim consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair presentation of the financial position of the Company at March 31, 2015, the results of operations of the Company for the three month period ended March 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively, and cash flows of the Company for the three month period ended March 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively. Although the Company believes that the disclosures in these financial statements are adequate to make the information presented not misleading, certain information normally included in the footnotes prepared in accordance with US GAAP has been omitted as permitted by the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). The accompanying financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014 filed with the SEC on March 13, 2015. The results for the three month period ended March 31, 2015 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2015, or any future period.

Revenue Recognition

The Company recognizes revenue primarily from the sale of products and from the sale of services and supplies. Revenue is recognized when delivery has occurred, persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, fees are fixed or determinable and collectability of the related receivable is probable. For product revenue, delivery has occurred upon shipment provided title and risk of loss have passed to the customer. Services and supplies revenue are considered to be delivered as the services are performed or over the estimated life of the supply agreement.

The Company recognizes revenue from the sale of its digital, film-based CAD and cancer therapy products and services in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Update No. 2009-13, “Multiple-Deliverable Revenue Arrangements” (“ASU 2009-13”) and ASC Update No. 2009-14, “Certain Arrangements That Contain Software Elements” (“ASU 2009-14”) and ASC 985-605, “Software” (“ASC 985-605”). Revenue for the sale of certain CAD products is recognized in accordance with ASC 840 “Leases” (“ASC 840”). For multiple element arrangements, revenue is allocated to all deliverables based on their relative selling prices. In such circumstances, a hierarchy is used to determine the selling price to be used for allocating revenue to deliverables as follows: (i) vendor-specific objective evidence of fair value (“VSOE”), (ii) third-party evidence of selling price (“TPE”), and (iii) best estimate of the selling price (“BESP”). VSOE generally exists only when the deliverable is sold separately and is the price actually charged for that deliverable. The process for determining BESP for deliverables without VSOE or TPE considers multiple factors

6

Table of Contents

iCAD, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

March 31, 2015

including relative selling prices; competitive prices in the marketplace, and management judgment; however, these may vary depending upon the unique facts and circumstances related to each deliverable.

The Company uses customer purchase orders that are subject to the Company’s terms and conditions or, in the case of an Original Equipment Manufacturer (“OEM”) are governed by distribution agreements. In accordance with the Company’s distribution agreements, the OEM does not have a right of return, and title and risk of loss passes to the OEM upon shipment. The Company generally ships Free On Board shipping point and uses shipping documents and third-party proof of delivery to verify delivery and transfer of title. In addition, the Company assesses whether collection is probable by considering a number of factors, including past transaction history with the customer and the creditworthiness of the customer, as obtained from third party credit references.

If the terms of the sale include customer acceptance provisions and compliance with those provisions cannot be demonstrated, all revenue is deferred and not recognized until such acceptance occurs. The Company considers all relevant facts and circumstances in determining when to recognize revenue, including contractual obligations to the customer, the customer’s post-delivery acceptance provisions, if any, and the installation process.

The Company has determined that iCAD’s digital, and film based sales generally follow the guidance of FASB ASC Topic 605 “Revenue Recognition” (“ASC 605”) as the software has been considered essential to the functionality of the product per the guidance of ASU 2009-14. Typically, the responsibility for the installation process lies with the OEM partner. On occasion, when iCAD is responsible for product installation, the installation element is considered a separate unit of accounting because the delivered product has stand-alone value to the customer. In these instances, the Company allocates revenue to the deliverables based on the framework established within ASU 2009-13. Therefore, the installation and training revenue is recognized as the services are performed according to the BESP of the element. Revenue from the digital and film based equipment, when there is installation, is recognized based on the relative selling price allocation of the BESP, when delivered.

Revenue from certain CAD products is recognized in accordance with ASC 985-605. Sales of this product include training, and the Company has established VSOE for this element. Product revenue is determined based on the residual value in the arrangement, and is recognized when delivered. Revenue for training is deferred and recognized when the training has been completed.

The Company recognizes post contract customer support revenue together with the initial licensing fee for certain MRI products in accordance with ASC 985-605-25-71.

Sales of the Company’s Therapy segment products typically include a controller, accessories, source agreements and services. The Company allocates revenue to the deliverables in the arrangement based on the BESP in accordance with ASU 2009-13.

7

Table of Contents

iCAD, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

March 31, 2015

Product revenue is generally recognized when the product has been delivered and service and source revenue is typically recognized over the life of the service and source agreement. The Company includes the following in service and supplies revenue: the sale of physics and management services, the lease of electronic brachytherapy equipment, development fees, supplies and the right to use the Company’s AxxentHub software. Physics and management services revenue and development fees are considered to be delivered as the services are performed or over the estimated life of the agreement. The Company typically bills items monthly over the life of the agreement except for development fees, which are generally billed in advance or over a 12 month period and the fee for treatment supplies which is generally billed in advance.

The Company defers revenue from the sale of certain service contracts and recognizes the related revenue on a straight-line basis in accordance with ASC Topic 605-20, “Services”. The Company provides for estimated warranty costs on original product warranties at the time of sale.

Cost of Revenue

Cost of revenue consists of the costs of products purchased for resale, costs relating to service including personnel costs for physicists, management services and radiation therapists, costs of service contracts to maintain equipment after the warranty period, product installation, training, customer support, certain warranty repair costs, inbound freight and duty, cost of supplies, manufacturing, warehousing, material movement, inspection, scrap, rework, amortization, depreciation and in-house product warranty repairs.

In September 2014, the Company reclassified depreciation previously included in product and service cost of revenue to amortization and depreciation as a separate component of cost of revenue. For the three months ended March 31, 2014, approximately $331,000 was reclassified to conform to current period classification. Included in cost of revenue related to the Medical Device Excise tax is approximately $199,000 and $179,000, for the three months ended March 31, 2015 and March 31, 2014, respectively.

Segments

The Company reports the results of two segments, Cancer Detection (“Detection”) and Cancer Therapy (“Therapy”). The Detection segment consists of our advanced image analysis and workflow products. The Therapy segment consists of our radiation therapy (“Axxent”) products, physics and management services, development fees, supplies, and the right to use the AxxentHub software platform.

8

Table of Contents

iCAD, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

March 31, 2015

Note 2 - Loss per Common Share

The Company’s basic net loss per share is computed by dividing net loss by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding for the period.

A summary of the Company’s calculation of net loss per share is as follows (in thousands except per share amounts):

The shares of the Company’s common stock, issuable upon the exercise of stock options and warrants and vesting of restricted stock that were excluded from the calculation of diluted net loss per share because their effect would have been antidilutive is as follows:

Note 3 – Acquisition of DermEbx and Radion

On July 15, 2014, the Company entered into two Asset Purchase Agreements, one with Radion, Inc. (“Radion”) the other with DermEbx, a series of Radion Capital Partners LLC (“DermEbx”) (the “Acquisition”). Pursuant to the Asset Purchase Agreement with DermEbx, the Company purchased substantially all of the assets of DermEbx, including all of DermEbx’s intellectual property and customer contracts. The Company paid the following consideration to DermEbx: (i) $1,600,000 in cash and (ii) 600,000 restricted

9

Table of Contents

iCAD, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

March 31, 2015

shares of the Company’s common stock, $0.01 par value per share. The 600,000 restricted shares are subject to the following provisions; 25% was locked up until the date that was two trading days after the Company announced its fourth quarter 2014 earnings, which occurred on March 2, 2015; 30% of the shares shall be locked up for a period of 24 months from the date of the agreement; and 30% of the shares shall be locked up for a period of 36 months from the date of the agreement. In addition the Company delivered the remaining 15%, or 90,000, of the restricted shares to US Bank, N.A., as escrow agent, to be held in escrow for a period of 18 months pursuant to the terms of an escrow agreement. The 90,000 escrow shares will act as the source of payment for the indemnification of the Company by DermEbx under the DermEbx Asset Purchase Agreement.

Pursuant to the terms of the Asset Purchase Agreement with Radion, the Company purchased substantially all of the assets of Radion, including all of Radion’s intellectual property and customer contracts. The Company paid the following consideration to Radion: (i) $2,382,000 in cash which included $182,000 payoff of an existing note payable and (ii) the issuance to Radion of 600,000 restricted shares of the Company’s common stock. The 600,000 restricted shares are subject to the following provisions; 25% of the shares were locked up until the date that is two trading days after the Company announces its fourth quarter 2014 earnings, which occurred on March 2, 2015; 30% of the shares shall be locked up for a period of 24 months from the date of the agreement; and 30% of the shares shall be locked up for a period of 36 months from the date of the agreement. In addition the Company delivered the remaining 15% or 90,000 of the restricted shares to US Bank, N.A., as escrow agent, to be held in escrow for a period of 18 months pursuant to the terms of an escrow agreement. The 90,000 escrow shares will act as the source of payment for the indemnification of the Company by Radion under the Radion Asset Purchase Agreement.

As a result of the acquisitions of the assets of DermEbx and Radion the Company now offers solutions that enable dermatologists and radiation oncologists to develop, launch and manage their eBx programs for the treatment of non-melanoma skin cancer, which we believe will provide opportunities to drive additional revenues in our Cancer Therapy segment. We do not anticipate significant synergies from this business; however we were able to consolidate the business operations of DermEbx and Radion in our San Jose, California facility. Prior to the acquisition, the Sellers represented one of the Company’s significant customers in the Therapy segment. The Company recognized approximately $0.7 million of Therapy product revenue and approximately $0.2 million of Therapy service revenue, for a total of $0.9 million related to Sellers, in the quarter ended March 31, 2014.

The amounts allocated to purchased and developed software, customer relationships, trade names, employee non-compete agreements and backlog were estimated primarily through the use of discounted cash flow valuation techniques. Appraisal assumptions utilized under these methods include a forecast of estimated future net cash flows, as well as discounting the future net cash flows to their present value. Acquired intangible assets are being amortized over the estimated useful lives as set forth in the following table. The following

10

Table of Contents

iCAD, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

March 31, 2015

is a summary of the preliminary allocation of the total purchase price based on the estimated fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed as of the date of the acquisition and the amortizable lives of the intangible assets:

The assets obtained in the acquisition of DermEbx and Radion and the resulting revenues are included in the Therapy segment and, accordingly, the goodwill resulting from the preliminary purchase price allocation is included in goodwill of the Therapy segment.

The goodwill of approximately $6.3 million is deductible for income tax purposes.

The unaudited proforma operating results for the Company for the three months ended March 31, 2014, assuming the acquisition of the assets of DermEbx and Radion occurred as of January 1, 2014 are as follows (in thousands except per share amounts):

Note 4 – Inventory

The components of inventory, net of allowance for obsolete, unmarketable or slow-moving inventories, are summarized as follows:

11

Table of Contents

iCAD, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

March 31, 2015

Note 5 – Long Term Debt

On March 31, 2015, the Company repaid in full the aggregate amount outstanding under the Deerfield Facility Agreement, dated as of December 29, 2011 (as amended, supplemented or otherwise modified to the date hereof, the “Facility Agreement”), by and among the Company, Deerfield Private Design Fund II, L.P., Deerfield Private Design International II, L.P., and Deerfield Special Situations Fund, L.P. and, for itself and as assignee of the obligations held by Deerfield Special Situations Fund International Master Fund, L.P. The Facility Agreement and related documents were terminated as of March 31, 2015. The Facility Agreement was to mature on December 29, 2016 and was able to be repaid prior to the maturity date at the Company’s option without penalty or premium. On March 31, 2015, the Company used cash on hand to pay the $11.25 million outstanding principal amount due under the Facility Agreement and approximately $162,000 in accrued and unpaid interest on such principal amount.

The Company recorded a loss on the extinguishment of debt of approximately $1.7 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2015.

The following amounts compose interest expense included in our consolidated statement of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014: (in thousands)

Cash interest expense represents the amount of interest paid in cash under the Facility Agreement which represents the interest of 5.75% on the Facility Agreement for the three months ended March 31, 2015, Non-cash amortization is the amortization of the discount on the Facility Agreement. The amortization of debt costs relates to the costs incurred with the financing, which is primarily a facility fee and a finder’s fee that were capitalized and

12

Table of Contents

iCAD, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

March 31, 2015

are being expensed using the effective interest method. The amortization of the settlement obligation represents the interest associated with the settlement agreements for both Carl Zeiss Meditec AG and Hologic, Inc (see Note 8). Interest expense capital lease represents interest related to the capital lease as described in Note 6.

Note 6 – Lease Commitments

Operating leases

Facilities are leased under operating leases expiring at various dates through September, 2017. Certain of these leases contain renewal options. Rent expense under operating leases was $165,000 and $162,000 for the three month period ended March 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively.

Future minimum lease payments as of March 31, 2015 under operating leases are as follows: (in thousands)

Capital leases

The Company entered into a capital lease agreement for the purchase of certain equipment in August 2013 for approximately $409,000. Under the guidance of ASC Topic 840, “Leases” (“ASC 840”) the Company determined that the lease was a capital lease as it contained a bargain purchase option whereby the Company has the option to buy the equipment for $1 at the end of the lease term. Accordingly, the equipment has been capitalized and a liability has been recorded. The equipment cost of $409,000 is reflected as property and equipment in the balance sheet and is being depreciated over its useful life.

In connection with the Acquisition, the Company assumed two separate equipment lease obligations with payments totaling approximately $2.6 million through May, 2017. The leases were determined to be capital leases and accordingly the equipment was capitalized and a liability of $2.5 million was recorded. As of March 31, 2015, the outstanding liability for the acquired equipment leases was approximately $2.2 million.

13

Table of Contents

iCAD, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

March 31, 2015

Future minimum lease payments under all outstanding capital leases are as follows: (in thousands)

Kamal Gogineni is an employee of one of the Company’s subsidiaries and a beneficial owner of more than 5% of the Company’s common stock. Additionally, Mr. Gogineni is a significant shareholder of Radion Capital Partners (“RCP”). RCP was the lessor under a lease between RCP and DermEbx (the “Lease”). In connection with the Company’s acquisition of assets of Radion and DermEbx that closed in July 2014, one of the assets and obligations that the Company acquired was the Lease. Pursuant to the Lease, the Company is obligated to pay a total of $1.0 million as of March 31, 2015 and the liability is included in the minimum lease payments above, with annual payments of $574,000 for the remainder of 2015, $396,000 in 2016 and $76,000 in 2017.

Note 7 - Stock-Based Compensation

The Company follows the guidance in ASC Topic 718, “Compensation – Stock Compensation”, (“ASC 718”).

Options granted under the Company’s stock incentive plans were valued utilizing the Black-Scholes model using the following assumptions and had the following fair values:

As of March 31, 2015 unrecognized compensation cost related to unexercisable options and unvested restricted stock and the weighted average remaining period is as follows:

The Company’s aggregate intrinsic value for stock options and restricted stock outstanding is as follows (in thousands):

14

Table of Contents

iCAD, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

March 31, 2015

Note 8 - Commitments and Contingencies

Foreign Tax Claim

In July 2007, a dissolved former Canadian subsidiary of the Company, CADx Medical Systems Inc. (“CADx Medical”), received a tax re-assessment of approximately $6,800,000 from the Canada Revenue Agency (“CRA”) resulting from CRA’s audit of CADx Medical’s Canadian federal tax return for the year ended December 31, 2002. In February 2010 the CRA reviewed the matter and reduced the tax re-assessment to approximately $703,000, excluding interest and penalties. The Company believes that it is not liable for the re-assessment against CADx Medical and no accrual has been recorded for this matter as of March 31, 2015.

Settlement Obligations

In connection with the acquisition of Xoft, the Company recorded a royalty obligation pursuant to a settlement agreement entered into between Xoft and Hologic in August 2007. Xoft received a nonexclusive, irrevocable, perpetual, worldwide license, including the right to sublicense certain Hologic patents, and a non-compete covenant as well as an agreement not to seek further damages with respect to the alleged patent violations. In return, the Company has a remaining obligation to pay a minimum annual royalty payment to Hologic, of $250,000 payable through 2016. In addition to the minimum annual royalty payments, the litigation settlement agreement with Hologic also provided for payment of royalties based upon a specified percentage of future net sales on any products that utilize the licensed rights. The estimated fair value of the patent license and non-compete covenant is $100,000 and is being amortized over the then estimated remaining useful life of approximately six years. In addition, a liability has been recorded within accrued expenses and long-term settlement cost for future payment and for future minimum royalty obligations totaling $423,000. The Company recorded interest expense of approximately $18,000 and $24,000 in the three months ended March 31, 2015 and March 31, 2014, respectively, related to this obligation.

In December, 2011, the Company agreed to a settlement related to the litigation with Carl Zeiss Meditec AG. The Company is obligated to pay $0.5 million in June 2015 and $0.5 million in June 2017, for an aggregate remaining total of $1.0 million. As of March 31, 2015, the remaining liability recorded within accrued expenses and long-term settlement cost for future payment and for future minimum royalty obligations is $867,000. The Company recorded interest expense of approximately $28,000 in the three months ended March 31, 2015 and March 31, 2014, respectively, related to this obligation.

15

Table of Contents

iCAD, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

March 31, 2015

Other Commitments

The Company is obligated to pay approximately $2.3 million for firm purchase obligations to suppliers for future product deliverables.

Litigation

The Company is a party to various legal proceedings and claims arising out of the ordinary course of its business. Although the final results of all such matters and claims cannot be predicted with certainty, the Company currently believes that there are no current proceedings or claims pending against it of which the ultimate resolution would have a material adverse effect on its financial condition or results of operations. However, should we fail to prevail in any legal matter or should several legal matters be resolved against us in the same reporting period, such matters could have a material adverse effect on our operating results and cash flows for that particular period. In all cases, at each reporting period, the Company evaluates whether or not a potential loss amount or a potential range of loss is probable and reasonably estimable under ASC 450, Contingencies. Legal costs are expensed as incurred.

Note 9 - Fair Value Measurements

The Company follows the provisions of ASC Topic 820, “Fair Value Measurement and Disclosures”, (“ASC 820”). This topic defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value under US GAAP and enhances disclosures about fair value measurements. Fair value is defined under ASC 820 as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. Valuation techniques used to measure fair value under ASC 820 must maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. The standard describes a fair value hierarchy based on three levels of inputs, of which the first two are considered observable and the last unobservable, that may be used to measure fair value which are the following:

A financial instrument’s level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of any input that is significant to the fair value measurement.

16

Table of Contents

iCAD, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

March 31, 2015

Our financial instruments include cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable and certain accrued liabilities and our notes payable. The carrying amounts of our cash and cash equivalents (which are composed primarily of deposit and overnight sweep accounts), accounts receivable, accounts payable and certain accrued liabilities approximate fair value due to the short maturity of these instruments. The carrying value of our notes payable approximates fair value due to the market rate of the stated interest rate.

The Company’s assets that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis relate to the Company’s money market accounts.

The Company’s money market funds are included in cash and cash equivalents in the accompanying balance sheets, and are considered a Level 1 investment as they are valued at quoted market prices in active markets.

The following table sets forth the Company’s assets and liabilities which are measured at fair value on a recurring basis by level within the fair value hierarchy.

Items Measured at Fair Value on a Nonrecurring Basis

Certain assets, including our goodwill, are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis. These assets are recognized at fair value when they are deemed to be impaired. We did not consider any assets to be impaired during the three months ended March 31, 2015.

Note 10 - Income Taxes

The provision for income taxes was $79,000 and $53,000, in the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively. The income tax provision relates primarily to state taxes. At March 31, 2015, the Company had no material unrecognized tax benefits and no adjustments to liabilities or operations were required under ASC 740, “Income Taxes”. The Company does not expect that the unrecognized tax benefits will materially increase

17

Table of Contents

iCAD, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

March 31, 2015

within the next twelve months. The Company did not recognize any interest or penalties related to uncertain tax positions at March 31, 2015. The Company files United States federal income tax returns and income tax returns in various states and local jurisdictions. The Company’s three preceding tax years remain subject to examination by federal and state taxing authorities. In addition, because the Company has net operating loss carry-forwards, the Internal Revenue Service and state jurisdictions are permitted to audit earlier years and propose adjustments up to the amount of net operating loss generated in those years. The Company is not under examination by any federal or state jurisdiction for any tax years.

Note 11 - Goodwill

In accordance with FASB ASC Topic 350-20, “Intangibles - Goodwill and Other”, (“ASC 350-20”), the Company tests goodwill for impairment on an annual basis and between annual tests if events and circumstances indicate it is more likely than not that the fair value of the Company is less than the carrying value of the Company.

Factors the Company considers important, which could trigger an impairment of such asset, include the following:

The Company’s Chief Operating Decision Maker (“CODM”) is the Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”). The two segments and reporting units are Cancer Detection (“Detection”) and Cancer Therapy (“Therapy”). Each segment generates revenue from the sale of medical equipment and related services and/or sale of supplies.

The Company performed the annual impairment assessment at October 1, 2014 and compared the fair value of each of reporting unit to its carrying value as of this date. Fair value of each reporting unit exceeded the carry value by approximately 315% for the Detection reporting unit and 255% for the Therapy reporting unit. The carrying values of the reporting units were determined based on an allocation of our assets and liabilities through specific allocation of certain assets and liabilities, to the reporting units and an apportionment of the remaining net assets based on the relative size of the reporting units’ revenues and operating expenses compared to the Company as a whole. The determination of reporting units also requires management judgment.

18

Table of Contents

iCAD, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

March 31, 2015

We would record an impairment charge if such an assessment were to indicate that the fair value of a reporting unit was less than the carrying value. When we evaluate potential impairments outside of our annual measurement date, judgment is required in determining whether an event has occurred that may impair the value of goodwill or intangible assets. We utilize either discounted cash flow models or other valuation models, such as comparative transactions and market multiples, to determine the fair value of our reporting unit. We make assumptions about future cash flows, future operating plans, discount rates, comparable companies, market multiples, purchase price premiums and other factors in those models. Different assumptions and judgment determinations could yield different conclusions that would result in an impairment charge to income in the period that such change or determination was made.

We determined the fair values for each reporting unit using a weighting of the income approach and the market approach. For purposes of the income approach, fair value is determined based on the present value of estimated future cash flows, discounted at an appropriate risk adjusted rate. We use our internal forecasts to estimate future cash flows and include an estimate of long-term future growth rates based on our most recent views of the long-term forecast for each segment. Accordingly, actual results can differ from those assumed in our forecasts. Our discount rate of approximately 17% is derived from a capital asset pricing model and analyzing published rates for industries relevant to our reporting units to estimate the cost of equity financing. We use discount rates that are commensurate with the risks and uncertainty inherent in the respective businesses and in our internally developed forecasts.

In the market approach, we use a valuation technique in which values are derived based on market prices of publicly traded companies with similar operating characteristics and industries. A market approach allows for comparison to actual market transactions and multiples. It can be somewhat limited in its application because the population of potential comparable publicly-traded companies can be limited due to differing characteristics of the comparative business and ours, as well as the fact that market data may not be available for divisions within larger conglomerates or non-public subsidiaries that could otherwise qualify as comparable, and the specific circumstances surrounding a market transaction (e.g., synergies between the parties, terms and conditions of the transaction, etc.) may be different or irrelevant with respect to our business.

We corroborated the total fair values of the reporting units using a market capitalization approach; however, this approach cannot be used to determine the fair value of each reporting unit value. The blend of the income approach and market approach is more closely aligned to our business profile, including markets served and products available. In addition, required rates of return, along with uncertainties inherent in the forecast of future cash flows, are reflected in the selection of the discount rate. Equally important, under the blended approach, reasonably likely scenarios and associated sensitivities can be developed for alternative future states that may not be reflected in an observable market price. We assess each valuation methodology based upon the relevance and availability of the data at the time we perform the valuation and weight the methodologies appropriately.

19

Table of Contents

iCAD, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

March 31, 2015

A roll forward of goodwill activity by reporting unit is as follows:

Note 12 – Segment Reporting

In accordance with FASB Topic ASC 280, “Segments”, operating segments, are defined as components of an enterprise that engage in business activities for which discrete financial information is available and regularly reviewed by the chief operating decision maker (“CODM”) in deciding how to allocate resources and assess performance.

The Company’s CODM is the Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”). Each segment generates revenue from the sale of medical equipment and related services and/or sale of supplies. The Company has determined there are two segments, Cancer Detection (“Detection”) and Cancer Therapy (“Therapy”).

The Detection segment consists of our advanced image analysis and workflow products, and the Therapy segment consists of our radiation therapy (“Axxent”) products, and related services. The primary factors used by our CODM to allocate resources are based on revenues, gross profit, operating income, and earnings or loss before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization, and other specific and non-recurring items (“Adjusted EBITDA”) of each segment. Included in segment operating income are stock compensation, amortization of technology and depreciation expense. There are no intersegment revenues.

We do not track our assets by operating segment and our CODM does not use asset information by segment to allocate resources or make operating decisions.

20

Table of Contents

iCAD, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

March 31, 2015

Segment revenues, gross profit, segment operating income or loss, and a reconciliation of segment operating income or loss to GAAP loss before income tax is as follows (in thousands):

Note 13 - Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09 “Revenue from Contracts with Customers” (ASU 2014-09), which amends ASC 605 “Revenue Recognition” and creates a new Topic 606 “Revenue from Contracts with Customers.” This update provides guidance on how an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. Upon initial application, the provisions of this update are required to be applied retrospectively to each prior reporting period presented or retrospectively with the cumulative effect of initially applying this update recognized at the date of initial application. This update also expands the disclosure requirements surrounding revenue recorded from contracts with customers. This update is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2016. We are currently evaluating the effect of this update on our financial statements and have not yet determined the method of initial application we will use.

Note 14 - Subsequent Event

In April 2015, the Company purchased the VuComp M-Vu Breast Density software for a purchase price of $1.7 million, which was paid in cash at closing.

21

Table of Contents

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

“Safe Harbor” Statement under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995: Certain information included in this Item 2 and elsewhere in this Form 10-Q that are not historical facts contain forward looking statements that involve a number of known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that could cause the actual results, performance or achievements of the Company to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievement expressed or implied by such forward looking statements. These risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, uncertainty of future sales and expense levels, protection of patents and other proprietary rights, the impact of supply and manufacturing constraints or difficulties, regulatory changes and requirements applicable to our products, product market acceptance, possible technological obsolescence of products, increased competition, integration of the acquired businesses, the impact of litigation and/or government regulation, changes in Medicare reimbursement policies, competitive factors, the effects of a decline in the economy in markets served by the Company and other risks detailed in the Company’s other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The words “believe”, “plan”, “intend”, “expect”, “estimate”, “anticipate”, “likely”, “seek”, “should”, “would”, “could” and similar expressions identify forward-looking statements. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on those forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date the statement was made.

Results of Operations

Overview

iCAD delivers innovative cancer detection and radiation therapy solutions and services that enable clinicians to find and treat cancers earlier and while enhancing patient care. iCAD offers a comprehensive range of upgradeable computer aided detection (CAD) and workflow solutions to support rapid and accurate detection of breast, prostate and colorectal cancers. iCAD’s Xoft® Axxent® Electronic Brachytherapy (eBx®) System® is a painless, non-invasive technology that delivers high dose rate, low energy radiation, which targets cancer while minimizing exposure to surrounding healthy tissue. The Xoft System is FDA cleared and CE marked for use anywhere in the body, including treatment of non-melanoma skin cancer, early-stage breast cancer and gynecological cancers. The comprehensive iCAD technology platforms include advanced hardware and software as well as management services designed to support cancer detection and radiation therapy treatments.

The Company has grown primarily through acquisitions including CADx, Qualia Computing, CAD Sciences, Xoft and DermEbx and Radion. The recent acquisition extends the Company’s position as a larger player in the oncology market, including the components that enable dermatologists and radiation oncologists to develop, launch and manage their electronic brachytherapy (“eBx”) programs for the treatment of non-melanoma skin cancer.

In the Detection segment, our industry-leading solutions include advanced image analysis and workflow solutions that enable healthcare professionals to better serve patients by identifying pathologies and pinpointing the most prevalent cancers earlier, a comprehensive range of high-performance, upgradeable Computer-Aided Detection (CAD) systems and workflow solutions for mammography, Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and Computed Tomography (CT).

22

Table of Contents

The Company intends to continue the extension of its superior image analysis and clinical decision support solutions for mammography, MRI and CT imaging. iCAD believes that advances in digital imaging techniques, such as 3D mammography, should bolster its efforts to develop additional commercially viable CAD/advanced image analysis and workflow products. In April 2015, the Company acquired the M-Vu Breast Density software, which we expect to be integrated with our CAD products. The purchase price was $1.7 million which was paid in cash at closing.

In the Therapy segment the Company offers an isotope-free cancer treatment platform technology. The Xoft Electronic Brachytherapy System (“Xoft eBx”) can be used for the treatment of early- stage breast cancer, endometrial cancer, cervical cancer and skin cancer. We believe the Xoft eBx system platform indications represent strategic opportunities in the United States and International markets to offer differentiated treatment alternatives. In addition, the Xoft eBx system generates additional recurring revenue for the sale of consumables and related accessories which will continue to drive growth in this segment. With the acquisition of DermEbx and Radion the Company now offers solutions that enable dermatologists and radiation oncologists to develop, launch and manage their eBx programs for the treatment of non-melanoma skin cancer.

The Company’s headquarters are located in Nashua, New Hampshire, with manufacturing and contract manufacturing facilities in New Hampshire and Massachusetts and an operations, research, development, manufacturing and warehousing facility in San Jose, California, which now includes the operations of Xoft, Radion and DermEbx.

Critical Accounting Policies

The Company’s discussion and analysis of its financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows are based on the Company’s consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. On an on-going basis, the Company evaluates these estimates, including those related to accounts receivable allowance, inventory valuation and obsolescence, intangible assets, income taxes, warranty obligations, contingencies and litigation. Additionally, the Company uses assumptions and estimates in calculations to determine stock-based compensation. The Company bases its estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that it believes to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. For a comprehensive list of the Company’s critical accounting policies, reference should be made to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014 filed on March 13, 2015.

23

Table of Contents

Three months ended March 31, 2015 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2014

Revenue: (in thousands)

Three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014:

Total revenue for the three month period ended March 31, 2015 was $13.2 million compared with revenue of $8.5 million for the three month period ended March 31, 2014, an increase of approximately $4.7 million, or 55.2%. The increase in revenue was due to a $4.1 million increase in Therapy revenue and an increase in Detection revenues of approximately $0.6 million.

Detection product revenue increased by approximately $0.8 million from $2.1 million to $2.9 million or 39.2% in the three months ended March 31, 2015 as compared to the three months ended March 31, 2014. The increase is due primarily to an increase in CAD revenue of approximately $0.6 million and an increase in MRI revenue of $0.2 million.

Detection service and supplies revenue decreased approximately $196,000 from $2.1 million in the three months ended March 31, 2014 to $1.9 million in the three months ended March 31, 2015. Service and supplies revenue reflects the sale of service contracts to our installed base of customers. The decrease in service and supplies revenue is due primarily to the decrease in OEM service contracts. Service and supplies revenue related to our installed base of customers can vary from quarter to quarter.

Therapy product revenue was approximately $1.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2015 as compared to $2.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2014. Revenue from the sale of our Axxent eBx systems can vary due to an increase or decrease in the number of units sold which can cause a significant fluctuation in product revenue in the period. Product revenue for the three months ended March 31, 2015 consists primarily of sales for use in the treatment of non-melanoma skin cancers as well as systems sold for use in intra-operative radiation therapy (“IORT”) market.

Therapy service and supplies revenue increased approximately $5.1 million from $2.2 million in the three months ended March 31, 2014 to $7.3 million for the three months ended March 31,

24

Table of Contents

2015. The increase in Therapy service and supplies revenue is due primarily an expanded service offering as a result of the acquisitions the assets of Radion and DermEbx which represented approximately $4.9 million of revenue in the current quarter. An additional $0.4 million is due to the increase in the installed base and associated source and service agreement revenues combined with disposable applicators which result from increased procedure volumes offset by a loss of DermEbx and Radion revenue of $242,000. We expect service and supplies revenue for our electronic brachytherapy products and dermatology solutions to increase as patient treatment volumes and our installed base of electronic brachytherapy systems increases.

In July 2014, we acquired the assets of DermEbx and Radion, each of which was a Therapy customer. For the three months ended March 31, 2014 we recognized approximately $724,000 of Therapy product revenue and $242,000 of Therapy service and supplies revenue, for a total of approximately $1.0 million, related specifically to these two customers.

Cost of Revenue and Gross Profit: (in thousands)

Gross profit for the three month period ended March 31, 2015 was $9.4 million, or 70.8% of revenue as compared to $5.9 million or 69.6% of revenue in the three month period ended March 31, 2014. Gross profit percent changes are primarily due to changes in the mix of business, consulting costs related to non-recurring engineering revenue, additional manufacturing investments and amortization of acquired intangibles.

25

Table of Contents

Operating Expenses: (in thousands)

Operating expenses increased by approximately $2.5 million or 39.5% in the three months ended March 31, 2015. The primary driver for the increase was the additional personnel related to the acquisition of DermEbx and Radion. We expect operating expenses to fluctuate as we continue to invest in our business to help drive growth in the market. These investments will be primarily in marketing and sales.

Engineering and Product Development. Engineering and product development costs for the three month period ended March 31, 2015 increased by $0.4 million or 21.2%, from $1.9 million in 2014 to $2.3 million in 2015. Therapy engineering and product development increased $0.4 million from $0.9 million in the three months ended March 31, 2014 to $1.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2015. The increase in Therapy engineering and product development costs was due primarily to increases in salaries, consulting and clinical costs. Detection engineering and product development costs remained at $1.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and the three months ended March 31, 2015.

Marketing and Sales. Marketing and sales expenses increased by $1.2 million or 47.8%, from $2.6 million in the three month period ended March 31, 2014 to $3.8 million in the three month period ended March 31, 2015. Therapy marketing and sales expense increased $1.0 million from $1.8 million in the three months ended March 31, 2014 to $2.8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2015. The increase in Therapy marketing and sales expenses was due primarily to

26

Table of Contents

increases in salaries and wages, consulting, trade shows and travel. These increases reflect continued investment in the Therapy segment. In January 2015, the Company incurred $275,000 of severance payments in the Therapy segment marketing and sales. Detection marketing and sales costs increased slightly by $0.2 million from $0.8 million in the three months ended March 31, 2014 to $1.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2015.

General and Administrative. General and administrative expenses increased by $0.5 million from $1.7 million in the three month period ended March 31, 2014 to $2.2 million in the three month periods ended March 31, 2015. The increase was due primarily to increases in personnel legal, accounting, consulting, travel and stock compensation expense.

Amortization and Depreciation. Amortization and depreciation is primarily related to acquired intangible assets and depreciation related to machinery and equipment. Amortization and depreciation increased by $369,000 from $251,000 in the three month period ended March 31, 2014 to $620,000 in the three month period ended March 31, 2015. The increase in expense was due to amortization of the acquired intangible assets related to the acquisition.

Other Income and Expense: (in thousands)

Loss on extinguishment of debt. The loss of $1.7 million from the extinguishment of debt represents the loss associated with the payoff of the Deerfield facility agreement, which has now been terminated. On March 31, 2015, the Company paid $11.25 million which represented the entire obligation. The loss on extinguishment represents the unamortized discount on the Facility agreement, and the write-off of the deferred debt costs. The Facility Agreement was to mature on December 29, 2016 and was able to be repaid at the Company’s option without penalty or premium.

Gain from change in fair value of warrants. The loss of $1.1 million from the change in fair value of the warrants for the period ended March 31, 2014, resulted from change in the fair value of the warrants under the binomial lattice based valuation methodology, due primarily to changes in the Company’s stock price, and volatility which are the key assumptions in determining the value of the warrants. On April 30, 2014, the warrants were exercised in full and the Company issued 450,000 shares of common stock.

Interest expense. Interest expense of $507,000 decreased by $310,000 or 37.9% for the three month period ended March 31, 2015 as compared to interest expense of $817,000 in the three month period ended March 31, 2014. The reduction in interest expense is due primarily to the reduction in interest related to the revenue purchase agreement that was terminated in April 2014. Interest related to the Hologic and Zeiss settlement obligations was $45,000 in the three months ended March 31, 2015 as compared to $52,000 in the same period in 2014.

27

Table of Contents

Interest income. Interest income of $9,000 and $4,000 for the three month periods ended March 31, 2015, and 2014, respectively, reflects income earned from our money market accounts.

Tax expense. Tax expense of $79,000 and $53,000 for the three month periods ended March 31, 2015, and 2014, respectively is due primarily to state non-income and franchise based taxes.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

We believe that our current liquidity and capital resources are sufficient to sustain operations through at least the next 12 months, primarily due to cash on hand. Our projected cash needs include planned capital expenditures, lease and settlement commitments, and other long-term obligations.

As of March 31, 2015, the Company had cash and cash equivalents of $20.3 million, current assets of $33.9 million, current liabilities of $18.0 million and working capital of $15.9 million. The ratio of current assets to current liabilities was 1.88:1. On March 31, 2015 the Company paid $11.2 million to repay the Deerfield facility agreement. The Company believes that there are financing sources available with better terms than the Facility Agreement. In April 2015, we purchased the M-Vu Breast Density software for a purchase price of $1.7 million, which was paid in cash at closing.

Net cash used for operating activities for the three month period ended March 31, 2015 was $168,000, compared to net cash used for operating activities of $1.7 million for the three month period ended March 31, 2014. The cash used for operating activities for the three month period ended March 31, 2015 resulted primarily from uses of cash due to working capital changes resulting from increases in accounts receivable and inventory and decreases in accrued expenses. We expect that cash used for or provided by operating activities may fluctuate in future periods as a result of a number of factors, including fluctuations in our operating results, specifically the timing of when we recognize revenue, our accounts receivable collections and the timing of other payments.

The net cash used for investing activities for the three month period ended March 31, 2015 was $0.5 million. The Company used approximately $534,000 for purchases of property and equipment. Cash used for investing activities of $217,000 in the three month period ended March 31, 2014 consisted primarily of purchases of property and equipment.

Net cash used for financing activities for the three month period ended March 31, 2015 was $11.2 million as compared to net cash provided by financing activities of $28.4 million for the three month period ended March 31, 2014. The net cash used of $11.2 million represents the repayment of the Deerfield facility agreement. The cash provided by financing activities reflects the underwritten offering in March 2014 of 2.76 million shares at approximately $11.00 per share, with net proceeds of $28.2 million after deducting offering expenses and underwriting discounts.

28

Table of Contents

Contractual Obligations

The following table summarizes, for the periods presented, our future estimated cash payments under existing contractual obligations (in thousands).

Operating lease obligations are the minimum payments due under these obligations. Capital lease obligations represent the principal payments due under the respective leases.

Settlement obligations represent the minimum payments attributable to the obligations related primarily to Zeiss and Hologic.

Other commitments represent firm purchase obligations to suppliers for future product deliverables.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

See Note 13 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

29

Table of Contents

We believe we are not subject to material foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations, as substantially all of our sales and expenses are denominated in the U.S. dollar. We do not hold derivative securities and have not entered into contracts embedded with derivative instruments, such as foreign currency and interest rate swaps, options, forwards, futures, collars or warrants, either to hedge existing risks or for speculative purposes.

Our management, with the participation of our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on this evaluation, as of March 31, 2015, the principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”) were effective at the reasonable level of assurance.

A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the Company have been detected. Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected. We conduct periodic evaluations to enhance, where necessary our procedures and controls.

Our principal executive officer and principal financial officer conducted an evaluation of our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f)) to determine whether any changes in internal control over financial reporting occurred during the quarter ended March 31, 2015, that have materially affected or which are reasonably likely to materially affect internal control over financial reporting. Based on that evaluation, there has been no such change during such period.

30

Table of Contents

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

Please refer to the detailed discussion regarding litigation set forth in Note 8 of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in this Form 10-Q.

The Company is involved in various legal matters that are in the process of litigation or settled in the ordinary course of business. Although the final results of all such matters and claims cannot be predicted with certainty, we believe that the ultimate resolution of all such matters and claims will not have a material adverse effect on our financial condition. However, such matters could have a material adverse effect on our operating results and cash flows for a particular period.

Item 1A. Risk Factors:

We operate in a changing environment that involves numerous known and unknown risks and uncertainties that could materially adversely affect our operations. Our risk factors are described in Part I, Item 1A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC for the year ended December 31, 2014 as filed with the SEC on March 13, 2015. There have been no material changes in the risks affecting iCAD since the filing of our Form 10K.

31

Table of Contents

32

Table of Contents

Signatures

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

33