IMAGEWARE SYSTEMS INC - Annual Report: 2017 (Form 10-K)
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
(Mark One)
[X]
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017
[ ]
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
For the transition period from [____] to [____]
Commission file number 001-15757
IMAGEWARE SYSTEMS INCORPORATED
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware
|
|
33-0224167
|
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
|
|
|
|
10815 Rancho Bernardo Road, Suite 310,
San Diego, CA 92127
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
||
(858) 673-8600
(Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area
Code)
|
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: Common
Stock, par value $0.01 per share
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned
issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes
[ ] No [X]
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file
reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes
[ ] No [X]
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all
reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file
such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements
for the past 90 days. Yes [X] No [ ]
Indicate
by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item
405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be
contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in
definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by
reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment
to this Form 10-K. [ ] Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a
large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated
filer, smaller reporting company or emerging growth company. See
definitions of “large accelerated filer,”
“accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting
company” and "emerging growth company" in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer
|
☐
|
Accelerated filer
|
☒
|
Non–Accelerated filer
|
☐
|
Small reporting company
|
☐
|
|
|
Emerging growth company
|
☐
|
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the
registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period
for complying with any new or revised financial accounting
standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange
Act. ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company
(as defined in Exchange Act Rule 12b-2). Yes
[ ] No [X]
The aggregate market value of the registrant’s common stock
held by non-affiliates of the registrant as of June 30, 2017, the
last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed
second fiscal quarter, as reported on the OTCQB marketplace was
$57,178,319.
This number excludes shares of common stock held by affiliates,
executive officers and directors.
As of March 13, 2018, there were 94,229,505 shares of the
registrant’s common stock outstanding.
IMAGEWARE SYSTEMS, INC.
Form 10-K
For the Year Ended December 31, 2017
Table of Contents
|
|
|
Page
|
|
|
||
|
|||
|
1
|
||
|
16
|
||
|
23
|
||
|
24
|
||
|
24
|
||
|
24
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
25
|
||
|
26
|
||
|
28
|
||
|
48
|
||
|
48
|
||
|
49
|
||
|
49
|
||
|
49
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50
|
||
|
55
|
||
|
62
|
||
|
65
|
||
|
68
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
69
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
CAUTIONARY STATEMENT
This Annual Report contains forward-looking statements
regarding our business, financial condition, results of operations
and prospects. Words such as “expects,”
“anticipates,” “intends,”
“plans,” “believes,” “seeks,”
“estimates” and similar expressions or variations of
such words are intended to identify forward-looking statements, but
are not the exclusive means of identifying forward-looking
statements in this Annual Report. Additionally, statements
concerning future matters such as the development of new products,
sales levels, expense levels and other statements regarding matters
that are not historical are forward-looking
statements.
Although forward-looking statements in this Annual Report
reflect the good faith judgment of our management, such statements
can only be based on facts and factors currently known by us.
Consequently, forward-looking statements are inherently subject to
risks and uncertainties and actual results and outcomes may differ
materially from the results and outcomes discussed in or
anticipated by the forward-looking statements. Factors that could
cause or contribute to such differences in results and outcomes
include without limitation those discussed under the heading
“Risk Factors” in Item 1A, as well as those discussed
elsewhere in this Annual Report. Readers are urged not to place
undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak
only as of the date of this Annual Report. We undertake no
obligation to revise or update any forward-looking statements in
order to reflect any event or circumstance that may arise after the
date of this Annual Report. Readers are urged to carefully review
and consider the various disclosures made in this Annual Report,
which attempt to advise interested parties of the risks and factors
that may affect our business, financial condition, results of
operations and prospects.
PART I
ImageWare Systems, Inc., a Delaware corporation
since 2005 and previously incorporated in California in 1987 as a
Utah corporation, has its principal place of business at 10815
Rancho Bernardo Road, Suite 310, San Diego, California 92127. We
maintain a corporate website at http://www.iwsinc.com.
Our common stock, par value $0.01 per share
(“Common
Stock”), is currently
listed for quotation on the OTCQB marketplace under the symbol
“IWSY.” As used in this Annual Report,
“we,” “us,” “our,” “ImageWare,” “ImageWare
Systems,”
“Company” or “our Company” refers to ImageWare Systems, Inc. and all
of its subsidiaries.
Overview
The Company is a pioneer and leader in the
emerging market for biometrically enabled software-based identity
management solutions. Using those human characteristics that are
unique to us all, the Company creates software that provides a
highly reliable indication of a person’s identity. The
Company’s “flagship” product is the patented IWS
Biometric Engine®. The
Company’s products are used to manage and issue secure
credentials, including national IDs, passports, driver licenses and
access control credentials. The Company’s products also
provide law enforcement with integrated mug shot, fingerprint
LiveScan and investigative capabilities. The Company also provides
comprehensive authentication security software using biometrics to
secure physical and logical access to facilities or computer
networks or internet sites. Biometric technology is now an integral
part of all markets the Company addresses and all of the products
are integrated into the IWS Biometric
Engine.
The Company is also a leading developer of mobile
and cloud-based identity management solutions providing patented
biometric authentication solutions for the enterprise. The Company
delivers next-generation biometrics as an interactive and scalable
cloud-based solution. The Company brings together cloud and mobile
technology to offer multi-factor authentication for smartphone
users, for the enterprise, and across industries. The Company has
introduced a set of mobile and cloud solutions to provide biometric
user authentication, including the GoVerifyID® mobile
application and cloud-based SaaS solutions. These solutions include
GoMobile Interactive (“GMI”), which provides patented, secure, dynamic
messaging. More recently the Company has introduced
GoVerifyID® Enterprise Suite, which provides turnkey
integration with Microsoft Windows, Microsoft Active Directory, and
security products from CA, HPE, IBM, and SAP. These solutions are
marketed and sold to businesses across many industries. For the
healthcare industry, The Company also developed and markets a
patented, FDA-Cleared, biometrically-secured, enterprise-level
platform for patient engagement and medication
adherence.
Historically,
we have marketed our products to government entities at the
federal, state and local levels; however, the emergence of
cloud-based computing, a mobile market that demands increased
security and interoperable systems, and the proven success of our
products in the government markets, has enabled us to enlarge our
target market focus to include the emerging consumer and
non-government enterprise marketplace.
Our biometric technology is a core software
component of an organization’s security infrastructure and
includes a multi-biometric identity management solution for
enrolling, managing, identifying and verifying the identities of
people by the physical characteristics of the human body. We
develop, sell and support various identity management capabilities
within government (federal, state and local), law enforcement,
commercial enterprises, and transportation and aviation markets for
identification and verification purposes. Our IWS Biometric Engine
is a patented biometric identity management software platform for
multi-biometric enrollment, management and authentication, managing
population databases of virtually unlimited sizes. It is hardware
agnostic and can utilize different types of biometric algorithms.
It allows different types of biometrics to be operated at the same
time on a seamlessly integrated platform. It is also offered as a
Software Development Kit (“SDK”) based search engine, enabling developers
and system integrators to implement a biometric solution or
integrate biometric capabilities into existing applications without
having to derive biometric functionality from pre-existing
applications. The IWS Biometric Engine combined with our secure
credential platform, IWS EPI Builder, provides a comprehensive,
integrated biometric and secure credential solution that can be
leveraged for high-end applications such as passports, driver
licenses, national IDs, and other secure
documents.
Our
law enforcement solutions enable agencies to quickly capture,
archive, search, retrieve, and share digital images, fingerprints
and other biometrics as well as criminal history records on a
stand-alone, networked, wireless or web-based platform. We develop,
sell and support a suite of modular software products used by law
enforcement and public safety agencies to create and manage
criminal history records and to investigate crime. Our IWS Law
Enforcement solution consists of five software modules: Capture and
Investigative modules, which provide a criminal booking system with
related databases as well asthe ability to create and print mug
photo/SMT image lineups and electronic mug-books; a Facial
Recognition module, which uses biometric facial recognition to
identify suspects; a Web module, which provides access to centrally
stored records over the Internet in a connected or wireless
fashion; and a LiveScan module, which incorporates LiveScan
capabilities into IWS Law Enforcement providing integrated
fingerprint and palm print biometric management for civil and law
enforcement use. The IWS Biometric Engine is also available to our
law enforcement clients and allows them to capture and search using
other biometrics such as iris or DNA.
Our
secure credential solutions empower customers to create secure and
smart digital identification documents with complete ID systems. We
develop, sell and support software and design systems which utilize
digital imaging and biometrics in the production of photo
identification cards, credentials and identification systems. Our
products in this market consist of IWS EPI Suite and IWS EPI
Builder. These products allow for production of digital
identification cards and related databases and records and can be
used by, among others, schools, airports, hospitals, corporations
or governments. We have added the ability to incorporate multiple
biometrics into the ID systems with the integration of IWS
Biometric Engine to our secure credential product
line.
Our GoVerifyID products support multi-modal
biometric authentication including, but not limited to, face,
voice, fingerprint, iris, palm, and more. All the biometrics can be
combined with or used as replacements for authentication and access
control tools, including tokens, digital certificates, passwords,
and PINS, to provide the ultimate level of assurance,
accountability, and ease of use for corporate networks, web
applications, mobile devices, and PC desktop environments.
GoVerifyID provides patented multi-modal biometric identity
authentication that can be used in place of passwords or as a
strong second factor authentication method. GoVerifyID is provided
as a cloud-based Software-as-a-Service (“SaaS”) solution; thereby, eliminating complex IT
deployment of biometric software and eliminating startup costs.
GoVerifyID works with existing mobile devices, eliminating the need
for specialized biometric scanning devices typically used with most
biometric solutions.
GoVerifyID
was built to work seamlessly with our patented technology
portfolio, including GoMobile Interactive®, the secure dynamic
messaging system, and the ultra-scalable IWS Biometric Engine that
provides anonymous biometric matching and storage. GoVerifyID is
secure, simple to use, and designed to provide instant identity
authentication by engaging with the biometric capture capabilities
of each user’s mobile device. GoVerifyID also provides a
fully open SDK for organizations that require the utmost in
flexibility.
Our
GoVerifyID Enterprise Suite for Windows easily and seamlessly
integrates with a user’s existing Microsoft
ecosystem/infrastructure to support the user’s extended
workforce. GoVerifyID Enterprise Suite secures corporate networks
from end-to-end – both applications and data – on
client, server, and cloud systems with flexible user login policies
to address varied trust requirements. Our GoVerifyID Enterprise
Suite works with the smart devices that the workforce already uses,
including iOS/Android smartphones and tablets.
Our GoVerifyID Enterprise Suite for Windows
provides biometric authentication for the Microsoft ecosystem that
secures enterprise security without compromising agility,
productivity, or user experience. Its comprehensive architecture
offers biometric authentication for the complete range of
enterprise stakeholders, delivering secure enterprise applications
and workspaces to internal employees, partners, suppliers and
vendors, even customers. Out-of-band authentication is provided via
universally available devices, such as smartphones and tablets.
In-band authentication can be enabled via fingerprint readers, iris
scanners, and any Windows Biometric Framework compatible device.
The server component provides easy centralized management of
biometric authentication policies for all users, using a standard
Snap-In to the Microsoft Management Console. It provides greater
user assurance and Single Sign-On (“SSO”) convenience for all corporate systems and
cloud applications. There is no compromise in agility or user
experience.
GoVerifyID Enterprise Suite also provides options
for seamless integration with leading Enterprise Identity and
Access Management (“IAM”) solutions including CA SSO, IBM Security
Access Manager (“ISAM”), SAP Cloud Platform, and HPE’s
Aruba ClearPass. These turnkey integrations provide multi-modal
biometric authentication to replace or augment passwords for use
with enterprise and consumer class systems.
Our
pillphone® Platform:
●
Improves
medication adherence and manages chronic conditions by enriching
the relationship between the care team and the patient via its
enterprise level, mobile communication platform;
●
Digitally
connects healthcare providers with patients and provides support
when the patients are outside of the medical facility;
●
Streamlines
workflows and improves care team communication and collaboration
with the patient by offering personalized, two-way interactive,
secure messaging and real-time remote medication monitoring;
and
●
Encances
the human connection of the care team that is essential for quality
patient-centered care.
Recent Developments
Creation of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock
On September 15, 2017, the Company filed the
Certificate of Designations, Preferences, and Rights of the Series
A Convertible Preferred Stock with the Delaware Division of
Corporations, designating 31,021 shares of the Company’s
preferred stock, par value $0.01 per share, as Series A Convertible
Preferred Stock (“Series A
Preferred”).
Series A Financing and Preferred Stock Exchange
On September 18, 2017, the Company offered and
sold a total of 11,000 shares of Series A Preferred at a purchase
price of $1,000 per share (the “Series A
Financing”), which amount
includes an aggregate total of 875 shares of Series A Preferred
issuable to Neal Goldman, a member of the Company’s Board of
Directors, and S. James Miller, the Company’s Chief Executive
Officer and member of the Board of Directors, in connection with
cash advances of $875,000 previously made to the Company. The net
proceeds to the Company from the Series A Financing were
approximately $10.9 million. Concurrently with the Series A
Financing, the Company entered into Exchange Agreements with
holders of all outstanding shares of the Company’s Series E
Convertible Preferred Stock, all outstanding shares of Series F
Convertible Preferred Stock, and all outstanding shares of Series G
Convertible Preferred Stock (collectively,
“Exchanged
Preferred”), pursuant to
which the holders thereof agreed to cancel their Exchanged
Preferred in exchange for the same number of shares of Series A
Preferred (the “Preferred Stock
Exchange”). As a result
of the Preferred Stock Exchange, the Company issued to the holders
of Exchanged Preferred an aggregate total of 20,021 shares of
Series A Preferred.
As
a result of the Preferred Stock Exchange, on October 19, 2017, the
Company filed Certificates of Elimination with the Delaware
Secretary of State to eliminate the Exchanged
Preferred.
Industry Background
Biometrics and Secure Credential Markets
The identity and access management market is
expected to grow from $7.2 billion in 2015 to $12.78 billion by
2020, at an expected Compound Annual Growth Rate
(“CAGR”) of 12.2%. This growth is based on a
growing demand for compliance management requirements and
increasing trends in mobility devices and applications. The main
drivers are:
●
Banking,
Financial Services & Insurance
●
Telecommunications
●
Public
Sectors
Audit
and regulation compliance is a key driving force in the market; it
is growing at the highest rate and will likely continue to grow
through 2020.
Identity
management solutions are rapidly moving into risk-based programs
focused on enforcement of access control and entitlement
management. The enterprise is achieving major benefits from costs,
but still lacks the capability to manage time-sensitive processes,
including manual approvals and provisioning.
Cloud
services to date, though increasing, still suffer from a perceived
lack of security. However, large enterprises are rapidly adopting
cloud models, especially in centralizing the management of
identities. This adoption is being done by still using on premise
identity management solutions, but also venturing into the cloud as
well. This means that the hybrid model, utilizing both cloud and
in-house identity management solutions, is increasing.
We
believe the biometric identity management market will continue to
grow as the role of biometrics becomes more widely adopted for
enhancing security and complying with government regulations and
initiatives and as biometric capture devices become increasingly
mobile, robust and cost effective. Our biometric and secure
credentialing solutions are meeting the requirements and standards
for true multi-modal biometric identity management systems, as well
as providing scalability to support evolving
functionality.
Some
of the industries that can benefit from biometric-based identity
management and are a major part of our examples
include:
Healthcare
●
Access
to patient health records
●
Sharing
patient records with other staff
●
Remote
access to clinical portals
●
Entering
Certified Physician Order Entry (“CPOE”)
systems
●
Submitting
electronic prescriptions (“e-Rx”)
Banking
●
Login
for online banking
●
Verifying
transactions made on a banking website
●
Mobile
banking apps
●
ATM
access
Retail/e-Commerce
●
Online
store purchases
●
Login
for a mobile store with a mobile device
●
Verifying
purchases on a website or at mobile stores
●
Sending
coupons & offers to mobile devices
Government
●
Airport
security
●
Customs
security
●
Rail
ticketing
●
Internet
access on trains & planes
●
Police
& fire services
●
Armed
forces
Law Enforcement and Public Safety Markets
The
United States law enforcement and public safety markets are
composed of federal, state and local law enforcement
agencies. Our target customers include local police and
sheriff’s departments, primary state law enforcement
agencies, prisons, special police agencies, county constable
offices, and federal agencies such as the Department of Homeland
Security, FBI, DEA and ICE.
In
addition, police agencies in foreign countries have shown interest
in using the full range of IWS Law Enforcement products to meet the
growing need for a flexible yet robust booking/investigative
solution that includes the routine use of IWS Facial Recognition as
well as the ability to use other biometrics. We continue to target
agencies in foreign countries for our biometric and law enforcement
solutions.
Law
enforcement customers require demanding end-to-end solutions that
incorporate robust features and functionalities such as biometric
and secure credentialing capabilities, as well as instant access to
centrally maintained records for real time verification of identity
and privileges. Law enforcement has long used the multiple
biometrics of fingerprint and face in establishing an
individual’s identity record. More recently, law enforcement
is seeking capability to utilize additional biometrics such as iris
and DNA. The Company’s multi-biometric platform product,
the IWS Biometric Engine, allows company customers to use as many
and different biometrics as desired all on a single, integrated
platform.
Agencies
are also moving toward a more shared experience where specific
pieces of suspect/arrest data may be viewed by outside agencies
allowing a suspect’s identity to be quickly defined with the
end goal being the swift apprehension of the subject.
Products and Services
Our
identity management solutions are primarily focused around
biometrics and secure credentials providing complete,
cross-functional and interoperable systems. Our biometric and
secure credentialing products provide complete and interoperable
solutions with features and functions required throughout the
entire identity management life cycle, enabling users the
flexibility to make use of any desired options, such as identity
proofing and enrollment, card issuance, maintenance and access
control. Our solutions offer a significant benefit that one
vendor’s solution is used throughout the various stages, from
establishing an applicant’s verified identity, to issuance of
smart card-based credentials, to the usage and integration to
physical and logical access control systems.
These
solutions improve global communication, the integrity and
authenticity of access control to facilities and information
systems, as well as enhance security, increase efficiency, reduce
identity fraud, and protect personal privacy.
We
categorize our identity management products and services into three
basic markets: (i) Biometrics, (ii) Secure Credential, and (iii)
Law Enforcement and Public Safety. We offer a series of
modular products that can be seamlessly integrated into an
end-to-end solution or licensed as individual
components.
Biometrics
Our
biometric product line consists of the following:
GoMobile InteractiveTM
In July 2013, the Company introduced its mobile
biometric identity management platform, GoMobile InteractiveTM
(“GMI”). Based upon acquired patented
messaging platform technology combined with the Company’s
patented IWS Biometric Engine®, GMI allows global business,
service and content providers to offer users biometric security for
their products, services and content on the Android or iPhone
operating systems. GMI includes a standalone application that can
be used as a turnkey solution, as well as an SDK, enabling
integration with existing mobile applications for Android and
iPhone. Targeted verticals for the product include mobile
banking and value transfer, retail, healthcare and entertainment
services. By supporting multi-modal biometrics on a mobile device,
the Company is able to offer an out-of-band security solution that
is far superior to traditional password or PIN protection, which
are now failing and costing businesses billions of dollars. In
addition, the GMI service supports dynamic information gathering,
allowing clients to learn about their users through the use of
interactive surveys that can be secured using
biometrics.
IWS Biometric Engine
This
is a biometric identity management platform for multi-biometric
enrollment, management and authentication, managing population
databases of unlimited sizes without regard to hardware or
algorithm. Searches can be 1:1 (verification), 1:N
(identification), X:N (investigative) and N:N (database integrity).
IWS Biometric Engine is technology and biometric agnostic, enabling
the use of biometric devices and algorithms from any vendor, and
the support of the following biometric types: finger, face, iris,
hand geometry, palm, signature, DNA, voice, 3D face and retina. IWS
Biometric Engine is a second-generation solution from the Company
that is based on field-proven ImageWare technology solutions that
have been used to manage millions of biometric records since 1997
and is ideal for a variety of applications, including: criminal
booking, background checks (civil and criminal), watch list,
visa/passport and border control (air, land and sea), physical and
logical access control, and other highly-secure identity management
environments. The Company believes that this product will be
very attractive to the emerging commercial and consumer markets as
they deploy biometric identity management systems.
Our
IWS Biometric Engine is scalable, and biometric images and
templates can be enrolled either live or offline. Because it
stores the enrolled images, a new algorithm can be quickly
converted to support new or alternate algorithms and capture
devices. The IWS Biometric Engine is built to be hardware
“agnostic,” and currently supports over 100 hardware
capture devices and over 70 biometric algorithms.
The
IWS Biometric Engine is available as an SDK, as well as a platform
for custom configurations to meet specific customer requirements.
The added suite of products provides government, law enforcement,
border management and enterprise businesses a wide variety of
application-specific solutions that address specific government
mandates and technology standards. It also provides the ability to
integrate into existing legacy systems and expand based upon
specific customer requirements. This enables users to integrate a
complete solution or components as needed. The application suite of
products includes packaged solutions for:
●
HSPD-12 personal identity verification
●
Border management
●
Applicant identity vetting
●
Mobile acquisition
●
Physical access control
●
Single-Sign-On and logical access control
IWS PIV Management
Application. The
Company provides a set of Enterprise Server products within our
complete PIV solution, and these software products supply
server-based features and functions, while the use case for PIV
requires client-based presentation of PIV data and
workflow. The IWS PIV Management Application supplies the
web-based graphical user interface that presents the user or client
interface to the various server functions. Since the
server-based applications perform specific functions for specific
phases of the PIV life cycle, these server-based applications need
to be bound together with additional workflow processes. The
IWS PIV Management Application meets this need with software
modules that interface and interconnect the server-based
applications.
IWS PIV
Middleware. The IWS
PIV Middleware product, which is NIST certified and listed on the
GSA approved product list, is a library of functions that connect a
card reader & PIV card on the hardware side with a software
application. The library implements the specified PIV Middleware
API functions that support interoperability of PIV Cards. This
software has been developed in conformance with the FIPS-201
specification, and the software has been certified by the NIST
Personal Identification Verification Program
(“NPIVP”) Validation Authority as being
compliant.
IWS Background
Server. The IWS
Background Server is a software application designed specifically
for government and law enforcement organizations to support the
first stage of biometric identity management functions such as
identity proofing and vetting. IWS Background Check Server
automatically processes the submission of an applicant’s
demographic and biographic data to investigative bureaus for
background checks prior to issuing a
credential.
IWS Desktop
Security. IWS
Desktop Security is a highly flexible, scalable and modular
authentication management platform that is optimized to enhance
network security and usability. This architecture provides an
additional layer of security to workstations, networks and systems
through advanced encryption and authentication technologies.
Biometric technologies (face, fingerprint, iris, voice or
signature), can be seamlessly coupled with TPM chips to further
enhance corporate security. USB tokens, smart cards and RFID
technologies can also be readily integrated. Additional features include:
●
Support for multiple authentication tools,
including Public Key Infrastructure (“PKI”) within a uniformed platform and
Privilege Management Infrastructure (“PMI”) technology, to provide more
advanced access control services and assure authentication and data
integrity;
●
Integration with IWS Biometric Engine for searching and match
capabilities (1:1, 1:N and X:N);
●
Integration with IWS EPI Builder for the production and management
of secure credentials;
●
Support for both BioAPI and BAPI standards;
●
Supports a Single Sign-On feature that securely manages Internet
Explorer and Windows application ID and password
information;
●
Supports file and folder encryption features; and
●
Supports various operating systems, including Microsoft Windows
2000, Windows XP, and Windows Server 2003.
IWS Biometric Quality
Assessment & Enhancement (“IWS Biometric
IQA&E”). The IWS
Biometric IQA&E is a biometric image enhancement and assessment
solution that assists government organizations with the ability to
evaluate and enrich millions of biometric images automatically,
saving time and costs associated with biometric enrollment while
maintaining image and database integrity.
The IWS Biometric IQA&E improves the accuracy
and effectiveness of biometric template enrollments. The software
may be used stand-alone or in conjunction with the IWS Biometric
Engine. IWS Biometric IQA&E provides automated image quality
assessment with respect to relevant image quality standards from
organizations such as International Civil Aviation Organization,
National Institute of Standards and Technology
(“NIST”), International Organization for Standards
(“ISO”) and American Association of Motor Vehicle
Association (“AAMVA”). IWS Biometric IQA&E also enables
organizations to conduct multi-dimensional facial recognition,
which further enhances accuracy for numerous applications,
including driver licenses, passports and watch
lists.
IWS
Biometric IQA&E automatically provides real-time biometric
image quality analysis and feedback to improve the overall
effectiveness of biometric images, thus increasing the biometric
verification performance, and maintaining database and image data
integrity. IWS Biometric IQA&E provides a complete platform
that includes an image enhancement library for biometric types
including face, finger and iris.
Secure Credential
Our
secure credential products consist of the following:
GoVerifyID®. On
November 14, 2016, the Company introduced GoVerifyID®
Enterprise Suite, a multi-modal,
multi-factor biometric authentication solution for the enterprise
market. An algorithm-agnostic solution, GoVerify ID Enterprise
Suite is an end-to-end biometric platform that seamlessly
integrates with an enterprise’s existing Microsoft
infrastructure, offering businesses a turnkey biometric solution
for quick deployment. The Company feels that this product has the
potential to dramatically accelerate adoption of its biometric
solution due to the worldwide prevalence of enterprise use of the
Microsoft infrastructure. Working across the entire enterprise ecosystem,
GoVerifyID Enterprise Suite offers a consistent user experience and
centralized administration with the highest level of security,
flexibility, and usability. GoVerifyID Enterprise Suite embodies
the following characteristics:
●
Mobile-workforce friendly—With GoVerifyID Enterprise Suite
user authentication logins are possible for a tablet or laptop even
when disconnected from the corporate network. Additionally,
GoVerifyID Enterprise Suite offers a consistent user authentication
experience across all login environments;
●
Hybrid cloud— GoVerifyID
Enterprise Suite is linked from the cloud to an enterprise’s
Microsoft infrastructure and is backward compatible with Windows 7,
8 and 10. Additionally, because the solution is SaaS-based, it can
easily scale to process hundreds of millions of transactions and
store just as many biometrics; and
●
Seamless integration—GoVerifyID Enterprise Suite is a snap-in
to the Microsoft Management console and can be centrally managed at
the server. Additionally, the solution allows for seamless movement
as it integrates with Active Directory using an
organization’s existing Microsoft security
infrastructure.
IWS Card
Management. The IWS
Card Management System (“CMS”) is a comprehensive solution to support
and manage the issuance of smart cards complete with the following
capabilities:
●
Biometric enrollment and identity proofing with Smart Card encoding
of biometrics;
●
Flexible models of central or distributed issuance of
credentials;
●
Customizable card life-cycle workflow managed by the CMS;
and
●
Integration of
the CMS data with other enterprise solutions, such as physical
access control and logical access control (i.e.
Single-Sign-On).
IWS EPI
Suite. This is an ID
software solution for producing, issuing, and managing secure
credentials and personal identification cards. Users can
efficiently manage large amounts of data, images and card designs,
as well as track and issue multiple cards per person, automatically
populate multiple cards and eliminate redundant data entry. IWS EPI
Suite was designed to integrate with our customers’ existing
security and computing infrastructure. We believe that this
compatibility may be an appealing feature to corporations,
government agencies, transportation departments, school boards and
other public institutions.
IWS EPI
Builder. This is an
SDK and a leading secure credential component of identity
management and security solutions, providing all aspects of ID
functionality from image and biometric capture to the enrollment,
issuance and management of secure documents. It contains components
which developers or systems integrators can use to support and
produce secure credentials, including national IDs, passports,
International Civil Aviation Office -compliant travel documents,
smart cards and driver licenses. IWS EPI Builder enables
organizations to develop custom identification solutions or
incorporate sophisticated identification capabilities into existing
applications including the ability to capture images, biometric and
demographic data; enable biometric identification and verification
(1:1 and 1:X); as well as support numerous biometric hardware and
software vendors. It also enables users to add electronic
identification functionality for other applications, including
access control, tracking of time and attendance, point of sale
transactions, human resource systems, school photography systems,
asset management, inventory control, warehouse management,
facilities management and card production
systems.
IWS EPI
PrintFarm. While it
is the last stage of PIV Card Issuance, the PIV smart card printing
process is by no means the least important stage. Production
printing of tens of thousands of PIV cards requires a significant
investment and a well-engineered system. The IWS EPI PrintFarm
software offers a cost-effective, yet high-performance method for
high-volume card printing.
IWS PIV
Encoder. PIV smart
cards must be programmed with specific mandatory data, digital
signatures and programs in order to maintain the interoperability
as well as the security features specified for the cards. The IWS
PIV Encoder could be considered to be a complex device driver that
properly programs the PIV smart cards. The Encoder interacts
with the CMS for data payload elements. It interacts with the
Certificate Authority to encrypt or sign the PIV smart card data
with trusted certificates. Finally, it acts as the
application-level device driver to make the specific PIV smart card
encoding system properly program the smart card, regardless if the
system is a standalone encoding system or one integrated into a
card printer.
Law Enforcement and Public Safety
We believe our integrated suite of software
products significantly reduces the inefficiencies and expands the
capabilities of traditional booking and mug shot systems. Using our
products, an agency can create a digital database of thousands of
criminal history records, each including one or more full-color
facial images, finger and palm prints, biographic text information
and images of other distinctive physical features such as scars,
marks and tattoos (“SMT’s”). This database can be quickly searched
using text queries, or biometric technology that can compare
biometric characteristics of an unknown suspect with those in the
database.
Our
investigative software products can be used to create, edit and
distribute both mug photo and SMT photo lineups of any
size. In addition, electronic mug books display hundreds of
images for a witness to review and from which electronic selections
are made. The Witness View software component records the viewing
of a lineup (mug photo or SMT) detailing the images provided for
viewing along with the image or images selected. In addition to a
printed report, the Witness View module provides a non-editable
executable file (.exe) that may be played on any computer for court
exhibit viewing purposes.
Our
IWS Law Enforcement solution consists of software modules, which
may also be purchased individually. The IWS Law Enforcement Capture
and Investigative modules make up our booking system and database.
Our add-on modules include LiveScan, Facial Recognition, Law
Enforcement Web and Witness View as well as the IWS Biometric
Engine.
IWS Law
Enforcement. IWS Law
Enforcement is a digital booking, identification and investigative
solution that enables users to digitally capture, store, search and
retrieve images and demographic data, including mug shots,
fingerprints and SMT’s. Law enforcement may choose between
submitting fingerprint data directly to the State Automated
Fingerprint Identification System (“AFIS”), FBI criminal repository, or other
agencies as required. Additional features and functionality include
real-time access to images and data, creation of photo lineups and
electronic mug books, and production of identification cards and
credentials. IWS Law Enforcement also uses off-the-shelf
hardware and is designed to comply with open industry standards so
that it can operate on an array of systems ranging from a
stand-alone personal computer to a wide area network. To avoid
duplication of entries, the system can be integrated easily with
several other information storage and retrieval systems, such as a
records/jail management system (“RMS/JMS”) or an automated fingerprint
identification system.
Capture. This
software module allows users to capture and store a variety of
images (facial, SMT and others such as evidence photos) as well as
biographical text information. Each record includes images and text
information in an easy-to-view format made up of fields designed
and defined by the individual agency. Current customers of this
module range from agencies that capture a few thousand mug shots
per year to those that capture hundreds of thousands of mug shots
each year.
LiveScan. This
software module is FBI certified and complies with the FBI
Integrated Automated Fingerprint Identification System
(“IAFIS”) Image Quality Specifications
(“IQS”) while utilizing FBI certified LiveScan
devices from most major vendors. LiveScan allows users to capture
single to ten prints and palm data, providing an integrated
biometric management solution for both civil and law enforcement
use. By adding LiveScan capabilities, law enforcement organizations
further enhance the investigative process by providing additional
identifiers to identify suspects involved in a crime. In
addition, officers no longer need to travel to multiple booking
stations to capture fingerprints and mug shots. All booking
information, including images, may be located at a central
designation and from there routed to the State AFIS or FBI criminal
history record repository.
Investigative. This
software module allows users to search the database created with
IWS Law Enforcement. Officers can conduct text searches in many
fields, including file number, name, alias, distinctive features,
and other information, such as gang membership and criminal
history. The Investigative module creates a catalogue of possible
matches, allowing officers or witnesses to save time by looking
only at mug shots that closely resemble the description of the
suspect. This module can also be used to create a line-up of
similar facial images from which a witness may identify the
suspect.
Facial
Recognition. This
software module uses biometric facial recognition and retrieval
technology to help authorities identify possible suspects. Images
taken from surveillance videos or photographs can be searched
against a digital database of facial images to retrieve any desired
number of faces with similar characteristics. This module can also
be used at the time of booking to identify persons using multiple
aliases. Using biometrics-based technology, the application can
search through thousands of facial images in a matter of seconds,
reducing the time it would otherwise take a witness to flip through
a paper book of facial images that may or may not be similar to the
description of the suspect. The Facial Recognition module then
creates a selection of possible matches ranked in order of
similarity to the suspect, and a percentage confidence level is
attributed to each possible match. The application incorporates
search engine technology, which we license from various facial
recognition algorithm providers.
LE
Web. This software
module enables authorized personnel to access and search agency
booking records stored in IWS Law Enforcement through a standard
web browser from within the agency’s intranet. This module
allows remote access to the IWS Law Enforcement database without
requiring the user to be physically connected to the
customer’s network. This application requires only that the
user have access to the Internet and authorization to access the
law enforcement agency’s intranet.
EPI Designer for Law
Enforcement. The EPI
Designer for LE software is a design solution created for the IWS
Law Enforcement databases based on the IWS EPI Suite
program. This program allows integration with various IWS
databases for the production of unique booking/inmate reports,
wristbands, photo ID cards, Wanted or BOLO fliers, etc., created
from the information stored in booking records. Designs can be
created in minutes and quickly added to the IWS Law Enforcement
system, allowing all users with appropriate permissions immediate
access to the newly added form.
Maintenance and Customer Support
We
offer software and hardware support to our customers. Customers can
contract with us for technical support that enables them to use a
toll-free number to speak with our technical support center for
software support and general assistance 24 hours a day, seven days
a week. As many of our government customers operate around the
clock and perceive our systems as critical to their day-to-day
operations, a very high percentage contract for technical
support. For the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and
2015, maintenance revenues accounted for approximately 62%, 67% and
54% of our total revenues, respectively.
Software Customization and Fulfillment
We
directly employ computer programmers and retain independent
programmers to develop our software and perform quality control. We
provide customers with software that we specifically customize to
operate on their existing computer system. We work directly with
purchasers of our system to ensure that the system they purchase
will meet their unique needs. We configure and test the system
either at our facilities or on-site and conduct any customized
programming necessary to connect the system with any legacy systems
already in place. We can also provide customers with a
complete computer hardware system with our software already
installed and configured. In either case, the customer is provided
with a complete turnkey solution, which can be used immediately.
When we provide our customers with a complete solution including
hardware, we use off-the-shelf computers, cameras and other
components purchased from other companies such as Dell or Hewlett
Packard. Systems are assembled and configured either at our
facilities or at the customer’s location.
Customers
We
have a wide variety of domestic and international customers. Most
of our IWS Law Enforcement customers are government agencies at the
federal, state and local levels in the United States. Our secure
credential products are also being used in Australia, Canada, the
United Arab Emirates, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, Mexico, Colombia, Costa
Rica, Venezuela, Singapore, Indonesia and the Philippines. For the
year ended December 31, 2017, one customer accounted for
approximately 25% or $1,089,000 of total revenue and had $201,000
trade receivables as of the end of the year, as compared to two
customers that accounted for approximately 30% or $1,162,000 of
total revenue and had $78,000 trade receivables as of the end of
the December 31, 2016. For the year ended December 31, 2015, two
customers accounted for approximately 37% or $1,753,000 of total
revenue and had $78,000 trade receivables as of the end of the
year.
Our Strategy
Our
strategy is to provide patented open-architected identity
management solutions including multi-biometric, secure credential
and law enforcement technologies that are stand alone, integrated
and/or bundled with key partners including channel relationships
and large systems integrators such as, United Technology Security,
GCR, Unisys, Lockheed Martin, IBM and Fujitsu, among others. Key
elements of our strategy for growth include the
following:
Fully Exploit the Biometrics, Access Control and Identification
Markets
The establishment of the Department of Homeland Security coupled
with the movement by governments around the world to authenticate
the identity of their citizens, employees and contractors has
accelerated the adoption of biometric identification systems that
can provide secure credentials and instant access to centrally
maintained records for real-time verification of identity and
access (physical and logical) privileges. Using our products, an
organization can create secure credentials that correspond to
records, including images and biographic data, in a digital
database. A border guard or customs agent can stop an individual to
quickly and accurately verify his identity against a database of
authorized persons, and either allow or deny access as required.
Our technology is also standards based and applied to facilitate
activities such as federal identification mandates while complying
with personal identification verification standards such as
HSPD-12, International Civil Aviation Organization standards,
American Association of Motor Vehicle Administrators driver
licenses, voter registration, immigration control and welfare fraud
identification. We believe that these or very similar
standards are applicable in markets throughout the
world.
With
the identity management market growing at a rapid pace, biometric
identifiers are becoming recognized and accepted as integral
components to the identification process in the public and private
sectors. As biometric technologies (facial recognition,
fingerprint, iris, etc.) are adopted, identification systems must
be updated to enable their use in the field. We have built our
solutions to enable the incorporation of one or multiple
biometrics, which can be associated with a record and stored both
in a database and on a card for later retrieval and verification
without regard to the specific hardware employed. We believe
the increasing demand for biometric technology will drive demand
for our solutions. Our identity management products are built
to accommodate the use of biometrics and meet the demanding
requirements across the entire identity life cycle.
Expand Law Enforcement and Public Safety Markets
We intend to use our successful installations with customers such
as the Arizona Department of Public Safety and the San Bernardino
County Sheriff’s Department as reference accounts, and to
market IWS Law Enforcement as a superior technological solution.
Our recent addition of the LiveScan module and support for local
AFIS to our IWS Law Enforcement will enhance its functionality and
value to the law enforcement customer as well as increase the
potential revenue the Company can generate from a system
sale. We primarily sell directly to the law enforcement
community. Our sales strategy is to increase sales to new and
existing customers, including renewing supporting maintenance
agreements. We have also established relationships with large
systems integrators such as Sagem Morpho to OEM our law enforcement
solution utilizing their worldwide sales force. We will focus our
sales efforts in the near term to establish IWS Law Enforcement as
the integrated mug shot and LiveScan system adopted in as many
countries, states, large counties and municipalities as possible.
Once we have a system installed in a region, we intend to then sell
additional systems or retrieval seats to other agencies within the
primary customer’s region and in neighboring regions. In
addition, we plan to market our integrated investigative modules to
the customer, including Facial Recognition, Web and WitnessView. As
customer databases of digital mug shots grow, we expect that the
perceived value of our investigative modules, and corresponding
revenues from sales of those modules, will also
grow.
Software as a Service Business Model
With the advent of cloud-based computing and the
proliferation of smart mobile devices, which allow for reliable
biometric capture and the need to secure access to data, products
and services, the Company believes that the market for
multi-biometric solutions will expand to encompass significant
deployments of biometric systems in the commercial and consumer
markets. The Company therefore intends to leverage the strength of
its experience servicing existing government clients who have
deployed the Company’s products for large populations, as
well as its foundational patent portfolio in the field of
multi-modal biometrics and the fusion of multiple biometric
algorithms, to address the growing commercial and consumer market.
As part of its marketing plan, the Company offered new versions of
its product suite on a Software as a Service
(“SaaS”) model during 2016. This new business
model, which is intended to supplement the Company’s existing
business model, will allow new commercial and consumer clients to
biometrically verify identity in order to access data, products or
services from mobile and desktop devices. As of December 2017, we have received
significant interest and have entered into a number of proof of
concept arrangements with customers and partners who we anticipate
will initiate programs in the first half of
2018.
Mobile Applications
The
Company strengthened its patent portfolio in June 2012 with the
purchase of four U.S. patents relating to wireless technology from
Vocel. These patents, combined with the Company’s existing
foundational patents in the areas of biometric identification,
verification, enrollment and fusion, provide a unique and protected
foundation on which to build interactive mobile applications that
are secured using biometrics.
The combination of our biometric identification technologies and
wireless technologies has led to the development of the IWS
Interactive Messaging System, which is a push application platform
secured by biometrics that transforms mobile devices into a
complete mobile ID, enabling companies to create applications that
allow a range of unprecedented activities, from secure sharing of
sensitive information to biometrically securing a mobile wallet.
Identity authentication, using multi-modal biometrics gives users
the confidence that their personal information is secure while the
push marketing capabilities of the technology allow companies
unparalleled interactivity that can be personalized to the needs
and interests of their customers.
Sales and Marketing
We
market and sell our products through our direct sales force and
through indirect distribution channels, including systems
integrators. As of December 31, 2017, we had sales and account
representatives based domestically in the District of Columbia,
California, Colorado, Oregon and internationally in Mexico.
Geographically, our sales and marketing force consisted of six
persons in the United States, and one person in Mexico as of
December 31, 2017.
Our direct
sales organization is supported by technical experts. Our
technical experts are available by telephone and conduct on-site
customer presentations in support of our sales
professionals.
The
typical sales cycle for IWS Biometric Engine and IWS Law
Enforcement includes a pre-sale process to define the potential
customer’s needs and budget, an on-site demonstration and
conversations between the potential customer and existing
customers. Government agencies are typically required to purchase
large systems by including a list of requirements in a Request for
Proposal, known as an “RFP,” and by allowing several
companies to openly bid for the project by responding to the RFP.
If our response is selected, we enter into negotiations for the
contract and, if successful, ultimately receive a purchase order
from the customer. This process can take anywhere from a few months
to over a year.
Our
Biometric and ID products are also sold to large integrators,
direct via our sales force and to end users through distributors.
Depending on the customer’s requirements, there may be
instances that require an RFP. The sales cycle can vary from a few
weeks to a year.
In
addition to our direct sales force, we have developed relationships
with a number of systems integrators who contract with government
agencies for the installation and integration of large computer and
communication systems. By acting as a subcontractor to these
systems integrators, we are able to avoid the time consuming and
often-expensive task of submitting proposals to government
agencies, and we also gain access to large clients.
We
also work with companies that offer complementary products, where
value is created through product integration. Through teaming
arrangements, we are able to enhance our products and to expand our
customer base through the relationships and contracts of our
strategic partners.
We
plan to continue to market and sell our products internationally.
Some of the challenges and risks associated with international
sales include the difficulty in protecting our intellectual
property rights, difficulty in enforcing agreements through foreign
legal systems and volatility and unpredictability in the political
and economic conditions of foreign countries. We believe we can
work to successfully overcome these challenges.
Competition
The Law Enforcement and Public Safety Markets
Due
to the fragmented nature of the law enforcement and public safety
market and the modular nature of our product suite, we face
different degrees of competition with respect to each IWS Law
Enforcement module. We believe the principal bases on which we
compete with respect to all of our products are:
●
the unique ability to integrate our modular products into a
complete biometric, LiveScan, imaging and investigative
system;
●
our reputation as a reliable systems supplier;
●
the usability and functionality of our products; and
●
the responsiveness, availability and reliability of our customer
support.
Our
law enforcement product line faces competition from other companies
such as DataWorks Plus and 3M. Internationally, there are
often a number of local companies offering solutions in most
countries.
Secure Credential Market
Due
to the breadth of our software offering in the secure credential
market space, we face differing degrees of competition in certain
market segments. The strength of our competitive position is based
upon:
●
our strong brand reputation with a customer base, which includes
small and medium-sized businesses, Fortune 500 corporations and
large government agencies;
●
the ease of integrating our technology into other complex
applications; and
●
the leveraged strength that comes from offering customers software
tools, packaged solutions and web-based service applications that
support a wide range of hardware peripherals.
Our
software faces competition from Datacard Corporation, a privately
held manufacturer of hardware, software and consumables for the ID
market, as well as small, regionally based companies.
Biometric Market
The
market to provide biometric systems to the identity management
market is evolving and we face competition from a number of
sources. We believe that the strength of our competitive position
is based on:
●
our ability to provide a system which enables the enrollment,
management and authentication of multiple biometrics managing
population databases of unlimited sizes;
●
searches can be 1:1 (verification), 1:N (identification), X:N
(investigative), and N:N (database integrity); and
●
the system is technology and biometric agnostic, enabling the use
of biometric devices and algorithms from any vendor, and the
support of the following biometric types: finger, face, iris, hand
geometry, palm, DNA, signature, voice, and 3D face and
retina.
Our
multi-biometric product faces competition from French-based Safran,
Irish-based Daon, 3M and Aware Inc., none of which have offerings
with the scope and flexibility of our IWS Biometric Engine and its
companion suite of products or relevant patent
protection.
Intellectual Property
We
rely on trademark, patent, trade secret and copyright laws and
confidentiality and license agreements to protect our intellectual
property. We have several federally registered trademarks,
including the trademark ImageWare and IWS Biometric Engine, as well
as trademarks for which there are pending trademark registrations
with the United States, Canadian and other International Patent
& Trademark Offices.
We hold several issued patents and have several
other patent applications pending for elements of our products. We
believe we have the foundational patents regarding the use of
multiple biometrics and continue to be an IP leader in the
biometric arena. It is our belief that this intellectual property
leadership will create a sustainable competitive advantage. We
are an early pioneer in the first to file patents related to
multi-modal biometrics and currently are the worldwide leader in
multi-modal biometric patents, with 22 patents worldwide and 19
patents pending. These
technologies allow biometric matching using any type of
biometric modality for identity verification while protecting the
privacy of an individual. It is our belief that such technology
will be critical to providing biometric management solutions for
the consumer market where privacy protection has been a historical
issue and barrier to biometric
adoption.
The
Company strengthened its patent portfolio in June 2012 with the
purchase of four U.S. patents relating to wireless technology from
Vocel. These patents, combined with the Company’s existing
foundational patents in the areas of biometric identification,
verification, enrollment and fusion, provide a unique and protected
foundation on which to build interactive mobile applications that
are secured using biometrics.
We
regard our software as proprietary and retain title to and
ownership of the software we develop. We attempt to protect
our rights in the software primarily through patents and trade
secrets. We have not published the source code of most of our
software products and require employees and other third parties who
have access to the source code and other trade secret information
to sign confidentiality agreements acknowledging our ownership and
the nature of these materials as our trade secrets.
Despite
these precautions, it may be possible for unauthorized parties to
copy or reverse-engineer portions of our products. While our
competitive position could be threatened by disclosure or reverse
engineering of this proprietary information, we believe that
copyright and trademark protection are less important than other
factors, such as the knowledge, ability, and experience of our
personnel, name recognition and ongoing product development and
support.
Our
software products are licensed to end users under a perpetual,
nontransferable, nonexclusive license that stipulates which modules
can be used and how many concurrent users may use them. These
forms of licenses are typically not signed by the licensee and may
be more difficult to enforce than signed agreements in some
jurisdictions.
Research and Development
Our
research and development team consisted of 32, 38 and 32
programmers, engineers and other employees as of December 31, 2017,
2016 and 2015, respectively. We also contract with outside
programmers for specific projects as needed. We spent approximately
$6.0 million, $5.3 million and $4.6 million on research and
development in 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively. We continually
work to increase the speed, accuracy, and functionality of our
existing products. We anticipate that our research and development
efforts will continue to focus on new technology and products for
the identity management markets.
Employees
We
had a total of 64, 69 and 67 full-time employees as of
December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively. Our employees are
not covered by any collective bargaining agreement, and we have
never experienced a work stoppage. We believe that our relations
with our employees are good.
Environmental Regulation
Our
business does not require us to comply with any particular
environmental regulations.
Additional Available Information
We make available, free of charge, at our
corporate website (http://www.iwsinc.com)
copies of our annual reports filed with the United States
Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on
Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, proxy statements,
and all amendments to these reports, as soon as reasonably
practicable after such material is electronically filed with or
furnished to the SEC pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Exchange Act. We also provide copies of our Forms 8-K, 10-K,
10-Q, and proxy statements at no charge to investors upon
request.
All
reports filed by us with the SEC are available free of charge via
EDGAR through the SEC website at www.sec.gov. In addition, the
public may read and copy materials we have filed with the SEC at
the SEC’s Public Reference Room located at 100 F Street,
N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549. The public may obtain
information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by
calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330.
ITEM 1A.
|
RISK FACTORS
|
An investment in our Common Stock involves a high degree of risk.
Before investing in our Common Stock, you should consider carefully
the specific risks detailed in this “Risk Factors”
section and any prospectus or prospectus supplement. If any of
these risks occur, our business, results of operations and
financial condition could be harmed, the price of our Common Stock
could decline, and you may lose all or part of your
investment.
Available cash resources may be insufficient to provide for our
working capital needs for the next twelve months. In the event
such cash resources are insufficient to provide for our working
capital requirements, we will need to raise additional capital to
continue as a going concern.
During
the years ended December 31, 2017, we consummated a public offering
resulting in gross proceeds to the Company of approximately $10.9
million. In addition, during the years ended December 31, 2017 and
2016, we incurred borrowings under the Lines of Credit of
approximately $6,000,000, which amounts are due and payable on
December 31, 2018.
If
we are unable to implement our business plan, we may not generate
sufficient revenue and profit to repay the borrowings under the
Lines of Credit in full when due. As a result, unless the holders
of the notes issued under the Lines of Credit convert any
outstanding balance into shares of Common Stock, we will need to
seek an extension of the maturity date of the Lines of Credit on or
before December 31, 2018. If we are unable to further extend the
maturity date of the Lines of Credit, we will be required to raise
additional capital through debt and/or equity financing to continue
as a going concern. No assurances can be given that any such
financing will be available to us on favorable terms, if at all. At
this time, we do not have any commitments for alternative financing
or for an extension of the maturity date of the Lines of Credit.
The inability to obtain debt or equity financing in a timely manner
and in amounts sufficient to fund repay amounts due under our Lines
of Credit, our operations, if necessary, would have an immediate
and substantial adverse impact on our business, financial condition
and results of operations.
We have a
history of significant recurring losses totaling approximately
$170.5 million at
December 31, 2017, and these losses may continue in the
future.
As of December 31, 2017, we had an accumulated
deficit of approximately $170.5 million,
and these losses may continue in the future. We expect to continue
to incur significant sales and marketing, research and development,
and general and administrative expenses. As a result, we will need
to generate significant revenues to achieve profitability, and we
may never achieve profitability.
Our operating results have fluctuated in the past and are likely to
fluctuate significantly in the future.
Our
operating results have fluctuated in the past. These
fluctuations in operating results are the consequence
of:
●
varying demand for and market acceptance of our technology and
products;
●
changes in our product or customer mix;
●
the gain or loss of one or more key customers or their key
customers, or significant changes in the financial condition of one
or more of our key customers or their key customers;
●
our ability to introduce, certify and deliver new products and
technologies on a timely basis;
●
the announcement or introduction of products and technologies by
our competitors;
●
competitive pressures on selling prices;
●
costs associated with acquisitions and the integration of acquired
companies, products and technologies;
●
our ability to successfully integrate acquired companies, products
and technologies;
●
our accounting and legal expenses; and
●
general economic conditions.
These
factors, some of which are not within our control, will likely
continue in the future. To respond to these and other factors, we
may need to make business decisions that could result in failure to
meet financial expectations. If our quarterly operating results
fail to meet or exceed the expectations of securities analysts or
investors, our stock price could drop suddenly and significantly.
Most of our expenses, such as employee compensation
and inventory, are relatively fixed in the short term.
Moreover, our expense levels are based, in part, on our
expectations regarding future revenue levels. As a result, if our
revenue for a particular period were below our expectations, we
would not be able to proportionately reduce our operating expenses
for that period. Any revenue shortfall would have a
disproportionately negative effect on our operating results for the
period.
We depend upon a
small number of large system sales ranging from $100,000 to in
excess of $2,000,000 and we may fail to achieve one or more large
system sales in the future.
Historically,
we have derived a substantial portion of our revenues from a small
number of sales of large, relatively expensive systems, typically
ranging in price from $100,000 to $2,000,000. If we fail to receive
orders for these large systems in a given sales cycle on a
consistent basis, our business could be significantly harmed.
Further, our quarterly results are difficult to predict because we
cannot predict in which quarter, if any, large system sales will
occur in a given year. As a result, we believe that
quarter-to-quarter comparisons of our results of operations are not
a good indication of our future performance. In some future
quarters, our operating results may be below the expectations of
securities analysts and investors, in which case the market price
of our Common Stock may decrease significantly.
Our lengthy sales
cycle may cause us to expend significant resources for one year or
more in anticipation of a sale to certain customers, yet we still
may fail to complete the sale.
When
considering the purchase of a large computerized identity
management system, potential customers may take as long as eighteen
months to evaluate different systems and obtain approval for the
purchase. Under these circumstances, if we fail to complete a sale,
we will have expended significant resources and received no revenue
in return. Generally, customers consider a wide range of issues
before committing to purchase our products, including product
benefits, ability to operate with their current systems, product
reliability and their own budgetary constraints. While potential
customers are evaluating our products, we may incur substantial
selling costs and expend significant management resources in an
effort to accomplish potential sales that may never occur. In times
of economic recession, our potential customers may be unwilling or
unable to commit resources to the purchase of new and costly
systems.
A significant
number of our customers and potential customers are government
agencies that are subject to unique political and budgetary
constraints and have special contracting requirements, which may
affect our ability to obtain new and retain current government
customers.
A
significant number of our customers are government agencies. These
agencies often do not set their own budgets and therefore have
little control over the amount of money they can spend from
quarter-to-quarter or year-to-year. In addition, these agencies
experience political pressure that may dictate the manner in which
they spend money. Due to political and budgetary processes and
other scheduling delays that may frequently occur relating to the
contract or bidding process, some government agency orders may be
canceled or substantially delayed, and the receipt of revenues or
payments from these agencies may be substantially delayed. In
addition, future sales to government agencies will depend on our
ability to meet government contracting requirements, certain of
which may be onerous or impossible to meet, resulting in our
inability to obtain a particular contract. Common requirements in
government contracts include bonding requirements, provisions
permitting the purchasing agency to modify or terminate at will the
contract without penalty, and provisions permitting the agency to
perform investigations or audits of our business practices, any of
which may limit our ability to enter into new contracts or maintain
our current contracts.
During the year ended December 31, 2017, one customer
accounted for approximately 25% of our total revenues. In the event
of any material decrease in revenue from this customer, or if we
are unable to replace the revenue with additional customers, our
financial condition and results from operations could be materially
and adversely affected.
During the year ended December 31, 2017, one
customer accounted for approximately 25% or
$1,089,000 of
our total revenues. If this customer were to significantly reduce
its relationship with the Company, or in the event the we are
unable to replace the revenue through the sale of our products to
additional customers, our financial condition and results from
operations could be negatively impacted, and such impact would be
material.
We occasionally
rely on systems integrators to manage our large projects, and if
these companies do not perform adequately, we may lose
business.
We
occasionally act as a subcontractor to systems integrators who
manage large projects that incorporate our systems, particularly in
foreign countries. We cannot control these companies, and they may
decide not to promote our products or may price their services in
such a way as to make it unprofitable for us to continue our
relationship with them. Further, they may fail to perform under
agreements with their customers, in which case we might lose sales
to these customers. If we lose our relationships with these
companies, our business, financial condition and results of
operations may suffer.
We are dependent upon third parties for the successful integration
of our products, and/or the launch of our products. Any delay in
the integration of our products, or the launch of third-party
products may materially affect our results from operations and
financial condition.
Our current marketing
strategy involves the distribution of our products through larger
product partners and/or resellers that will either resell our
product alongside theirs, OEM a white label version of our
products, or sell our products fully integrated into their
offerings. Our strategy leaves us largely dependent upon the
successful rollout of our products by our distribution partners. We
have experienced delays in the rollout of our products due to these
factors during the years ended 2016 and 2017, and no assurances can
be given that we will not experience delays in the future. Any
delays negatively affect our results from operations and financial
condition.
If the patents we
own or license, or our other intellectual property rights, do not
adequately protect our products and technologies, we may lose
market share to our competitors and our business, financial
condition and results of operations would be adversely
affected.
Our success depends significantly on our ability
to protect our rights to the technologies used in our products. We
rely on patent protection, trade secrets, as well as a combination
of copyright and trademark laws and nondisclosure, confidentiality
and other contractual arrangements to protect our technology.
However, these legal means afford only limited protection and may
not adequately protect our rights or permit us to gain or keep any
competitive advantage. In addition, we cannot be assured that any
of our current and future pending patent applications will result
in the issuance of a patent to us. The U.S. Patent and Trademark
Office (“PTO”) may deny or require significant narrowing
of claims in our pending patent applications, and patents issued as
a result of the pending patent applications, if any, may not
provide us with significant commercial protection or may not be
issued in a form that is advantageous to us. We could also incur
substantial costs in proceedings before the PTO. These proceedings
could result in adverse decisions as to the claims included in our
patents.
Our
issued and licensed patents and those that may be issued or
licensed in the future may be challenged, invalidated or
circumvented, which could limit our ability to stop competitors
from marketing related products. Additionally, upon expiration of
our issued or licensed patents, we may lose some of our rights to
exclude others from making, using, selling or importing products
using the technology based on the expired patents. We also must
rely on contractual rights with the third parties that license
technology to us to protect our rights in the technology licensed
to us. Although we have taken steps to protect our intellectual
property and technology, there is no assurance that competitors
will not be able to design around our patents. We also rely on
unpatented proprietary technology. We cannot assure you that we can
meaningfully protect all our rights in our unpatented proprietary
technology or that others will not independently develop
substantially equivalent proprietary products or processes or
otherwise gain access to our unpatented proprietary technology. We
seek to protect our know-how and other unpatented proprietary
technology with confidentiality agreements and intellectual
property assignment agreements with our employees. However, such
agreements may not provide meaningful protection for our
proprietary information in the event of unauthorized use or
disclosure or other breaches of the agreements or in the event that
our competitors discover or independently develop similar or
identical designs or other proprietary information. In addition, we
rely on the use of registered and common law trademarks with
respect to the brand names of some of our products. Our common law
trademarks provide less protection than our registered trademarks.
Loss of rights in our trademarks could adversely affect our
business, financial condition and results of
operations.
Furthermore,
the laws of foreign countries may not protect our intellectual
property rights to the same extent as the laws of the United
States. If we fail to apply for intellectual property protection or
if we cannot adequately protect our intellectual property rights in
these foreign countries, our competitors may be able to compete
more effectively against us, which could adversely affect our
competitive position, as well as our business, financial condition
and results of operations.
If third parties
claim that we infringe their intellectual property rights, we may
incur liabilities and costs and may have to redesign or discontinue
selling certain products.
Whether
a product infringes a patent involves complex legal and factual
issues, the determination of which is often uncertain. We face the
risk of claims that we have infringed on third parties’
intellectual property rights. Searching for existing intellectual
property rights may not reveal important intellectual property and
our competitors may also have filed for patent protection, which is
not yet a matter of public knowledge, or claimed trademark rights
that have not been revealed through our availability searches. Our
efforts to identify and avoid infringing on third parties’
intellectual property rights may not always be successful. Any
claims of patent or other intellectual property infringement, even
those without merit, could:
●
increase the cost of our products;
●
be expensive and time consuming to defend;
●
result in us being required to pay significant damages to third
parties;
●
force us to cease making or selling products that incorporate the
challenged intellectual property;
●
require us to redesign, reengineer or rebrand our
products;
●
require us to enter into royalty or licensing agreements in order
to obtain the right to use a third party’s intellectual
property, the terms of which may not be acceptable to
us;
●
require us to indemnify third parties pursuant to contracts in
which we have agreed to provide indemnification to such parties for
intellectual property infringement claims;
●
divert the attention of our management; and
●
result in our customers or potential customers deferring or
limiting their purchase or use of the affected products until the
litigation is resolved.
In
addition, new patents obtained by our competitors could threaten a
product’s continued life in the market even after it has
already been introduced.
If our security measures or those of our third-party data center
hosting facilities, cloud computing platform providers, or
third-party service partners, are breached, and unauthorized access
is obtained to a customer’s data, our data or our IT systems,
or authorized access is blocked or disabled, our services may be
perceived as not being secure, customers may curtail or stop using
our services, and we may incur significant legal and financial
exposure and liabilities.
Our
services involve the storage and transmission of our
customers’ and our customers’ customers’
proprietary and other sensitive data, including financial
information and other personally identifiable information. While we
have security measures in place, they may be breached as a result
of efforts by individuals or groups of hackers and sophisticated
organizations, including state-sponsored organizations or
nation-states. Our security measures could also be compromised by
employee error or malfeasance, which could result in someone
obtaining unauthorized access to, or denying authorized access to
our IT systems, our customers’ data or our data, including
our intellectual property and other confidential business
information. Additionally, third parties may attempt to
fraudulently induce employees or customers into disclosing
sensitive information such as user names, passwords or other
information to gain access to our customers’ data, our data
or our IT systems.
We
take extraordinary measures to ensure identity authentication of
users who access critical IT infrastructure, including but not
limited to, two-factor, multi-factor and biometric identity
verification. This substantially reduces the threat of unauthorized
access by bad actors using compromised user
credentials.
Because
the techniques used to breach, obtain unauthorized access to, or
sabotage IT systems change frequently, grow more complex over time,
and generally are not recognized until launched against a target,
we may be unable to anticipate or implement adequate measures to
prevent against such techniques.
Our
services operate in conjunction with and are dependent on products
and components across a broad ecosystem and, as illustrated by the
recent Spectre and Meltdown threats, if there are security
vulnerabilities in one of these components, a security breach could
occur. In addition, our internal IT systems continue to evolve and
we are often early adapters of new technologies and new ways of
sharing data and communicating internally and with partners and
customers, which increases the complexity of our IT systems. These
risks are mitigated by our ability to maintain and improve business
and data governance policies and processes and internal security
controls, including our ability to escalate and respond to known
and potential risks.
In
addition, our customers may authorize third-party technology
providers to access their customer data, and some of our customers
may not have adequate security measures in place to protect their
data that is stored on our servers. Because we do not control our
customers or third-party technology providers, or the processing of
such data by third-party technology providers, we cannot ensure the
integrity or security of such transmissions or processing.
Malicious third parties may also conduct attacks designed to
temporarily deny customers access to our services.
A
security breach could expose us to a risk of loss or inappropriate
use of proprietary and sensitive data, or the denial of access to
this data. A security breach could also result in a loss of
confidence in the security of our services, damage our reputation,
negatively impact our future sales, disrupt our business and lead
to legal liability. Finally, the detection, prevention and
remediation of known or potential security vulnerabilities,
including those arising from third-party hardware or software may
result in additional direct and indirect costs, for example
additional infrastructure capacity to mitigate any system
degradation that could result from remediation
efforts.
We operate in
foreign countries and are exposed to risks associated with foreign
political, economic and legal environments and with foreign
currency exchange rates.
We
have significant foreign operations. As a result, we are exposed to
risks, including among others, risks associated with foreign
political, economic and legal environments and with foreign
currency exchange rates. Our results may be adversely affected by,
among other things, changes in government policies with respect to
laws and regulations, anti-inflation measures, currency
conversions, collection of receivables abroad and rates and methods
of taxation.
We depend on key personnel, the loss of any of whom could
materially adversely affect future operations.
Our
success will depend to a significant extent upon the efforts and
abilities of our executive officers and other key personnel. The
loss of the services of one or more of these key employees and any
negative market or industry perception arising from the loss of
such services could have a material adverse effect on us and the
trading price of our Common Stock. Our business will also be
dependent upon our ability to attract and retain qualified
personnel. Acquiring and keeping these personnel could prove more
difficult or cost substantially more than estimated and we cannot
be certain that we will be able to retain such personnel or attract
a high caliber of personnel in the future.
We may have additional tax liabilities.
We
are subject to income taxes in the United States. Significant
judgments are required in determining our provisions for income
taxes. In the course of preparing our tax provisions and returns,
we must make calculations where the ultimate tax determination may
be uncertain. Our tax returns are subject to examination by the
Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) and state tax
authorities. There can be no assurance as to the outcome of these
examinations. If the ultimate determination of taxes owed is for an
amount in excess of amounts previously accrued, our operating
results, cash flows, and financial condition could be adversely
affected.
We face competition from companies with greater financial,
technical, sales, marketing and other resources, and, if we are
unable to compete effectively with these competitors, our market
share may decline and our business could be
harmed.
We
face competition from other established companies. A number of our
competitors have longer operating histories, larger customer bases,
significantly greater financial, technological, sales, marketing
and other resources than we do. As a result, our competitors
may be able to respond more quickly than we can to new or changing
opportunities, technologies, standards or client requirements, more
quickly develop new products or devote greater resources to the
promotion and sale of their products and services than we
can. Likewise, their greater capabilities in these areas may
enable them to better withstand periodic downturns in the identity
management solutions industry and compete more effectively on the
basis of price and production. In addition, new companies may
enter the markets in which we compete, further increasing
competition in the identity management solutions
industry.
We
believe that our ability to compete successfully depends on a
number of factors, including the type and quality of our products
and the strength of our brand names, as well as many factors beyond
our control. We may not be able to compete successfully against
current or future competitors, and increased competition may result
in price reductions, reduced profit margins, loss of market share
and an inability to generate cash flows that are sufficient to
maintain or expand the development and marketing of new products,
any of which would adversely impact our results of operations and
financial condition.
Risks Related to Our Securities
Our Common Stock
is subject to “penny stock” rules.
Our
Common Stock is currently defined as a “penny stock”
under Rule 3a51-1 promulgated under the Exchange Act. “Penny
stocks” are subject to Rules 15g-2 through 15g-7 and Rule
15g-9, which impose additional sales practice requirements on
broker-dealers that sell penny stocks to persons other than
established customers and institutional accredited investors. Among
other things, for transactions covered by these rules, a
broker-dealer must make a special suitability determination for the
purchaser and have received the purchaser’s written consent
to the transaction prior to sale. Consequently, these rules may
affect the ability of broker-dealers to sell our Common Stock and
affect the ability of holders to sell their shares of our Common
Stock in the secondary market. To the extent our Common Stock is
subject to the penny stock regulations, the market liquidity for
our shares will be adversely affected.
-21-
Table of Contents
Our stock price
has been volatile, and your investment in our Common Stock could
suffer a decline in value.
There
has been significant volatility in the market price and trading
volume of equity securities, which is unrelated to the financial
performance of the companies issuing the securities. These broad
market fluctuations may negatively affect the market price of our
Common Stock. You may not be able to resell your shares at or above
the price you pay for those shares due to fluctuations in the
market price of our Common Stock caused by changes in our operating
performance or prospects and other factors.
Some
specific factors that may have a significant effect on our Common
Stock market price include:
●
actual or anticipated fluctuations in our operating results or
future prospects;
●
our announcements or our competitors’ announcements of new
products;
●
the public’s reaction to our press
releases, our other public announcements and our filings with the
SEC;
●
strategic actions by us or our competitors, such as acquisitions or
restructurings;
●
new laws or regulations or new interpretations of existing laws or
regulations applicable to our business;
●
changes in accounting standards, policies, guidance,
interpretations or principles;
●
changes in our growth rates or our competitors’ growth
rates;
●
developments regarding our patents or proprietary rights or those
of our competitors;
●
our inability to raise additional capital as needed;
●
substantial sales of Common Stock underlying warrants and preferred
stock;
●
concern as to the efficacy of our products;
●
changes in financial markets or general economic
conditions;
●
sales of Common Stock by us or members of our management team;
and
●
changes in stock market analyst recommendations or earnings
estimates regarding our Common Stock, other comparable companies or
our industry generally.
Our future sales
of our Common Stock could adversely affect its price and our future
capital-raising activities could involve the issuance of equity
securities, which would dilute shareholders’ investments and
could result in a decline in the trading price of our Common
Stock.
We
may sell securities in the public or private equity markets if and
when conditions are favorable, even if we do not have an immediate
need for additional capital at that time. Sales of substantial
amounts of our Common Stock, or the perception that such sales
could occur, could adversely affect the prevailing market price of
our Common Stock and our ability to raise capital. We may issue
additional Common Stock in future financing transactions or as
incentive compensation for our executive management and other key
personnel, consultants and advisors. Issuing any equity securities
would be dilutive to the equity interests represented by our
then-outstanding shares of Common Stock. The market price for our
Common Stock could decrease as the market takes into account the
dilutive effect of any of these issuances. Furthermore, we may
enter into financing transactions at prices that represent a
substantial discount to the market price of our Common Stock. A
negative reaction by investors and securities analysts to any
discounted sale of our equity securities could result in a decline
in the trading price of our Common Stock.
The holders of our
preferred stock have certain rights and privileges that are senior
to our Common Stock, and we may issue additional shares of
preferred stock without stockholder approval that could have a
material adverse effect on the market value of the Common
Stock.
Our Board of Directors has the authority to issue
a total of up to four million shares of preferred stock and to fix
the rights, preferences, privileges, and restrictions, including
voting rights, of the preferred stock, which typically are senior
to the rights of the Common Stockholders, without any further vote
or action by the Common Stockholders. The rights of our Common
Stockholders will be subject to, and may be adversely affected by,
the rights of the holders of the preferred stock that have been
issued, or might be issued in the future. Preferred stock also
could have the effect of making it more difficult for a third party
to acquire a majority of our outstanding voting stock. This could
delay, defer, or prevent a change in control. Furthermore, holders
of preferred stock may have other rights,including economic rights,
senior to the Common Stock. As a result, their existence and
issuance could have a material adverse effect on the market value
of the Common Stock. We have in the past issued, and may from time
to time in the future issue, preferred stock for financing or other
purposes with rights, preferences, or privileges senior to the
Common Stock. As of December 31, 2017, we had two series of
preferred stock outstanding, Series A Convertible Redeemable
Preferred Stock (“Series A
Preferred”) and Series B
Convertible Redeemable Preferred Stock (“Series B
Preferred”).
The
provisions of our Series A Preferred prohibit the payment of
dividends on our Common Stock unless the dividends on our preferred
shares are first paid. In addition, upon a liquidation, dissolution
or sale of our business, the holders of our Series A Preferred will
be entitled to receive, in preference to any distribution to the
holders of Common Stock, initial distributions of $1,000 per share,
plus all accrued but unpaid dividends. As of December 31, 2017, we
had cumulative undeclared dividends on our Series A Preferred of
$0.
The
provisions of our Series B Preferred prohibit the payment of
dividends on our Common Stock unless the dividends on our preferred
shares are first paid. In addition, upon a liquidation, dissolution
or sale of our business, the holders of our Series B Preferred will
be entitled to receive, in preference to any distribution to the
holders of Common Stock, initial distributions of $2.50 per share,
plus all accrued but unpaid dividends. As of December 31, 2017, we
had cumulative undeclared dividends on our Series B Preferred of
approximately $8,000.
Certain
large shareholders may have certain personal interests that may
affect the Company.
As a result of the shares issued to Goldman
Capital Management and related entities controlled by Neal Goldman,
a member of our Board of Directors (together,
“Goldman”), Goldman beneficially owns, in the
aggregate, approximately 40.8%
of the Company’s outstanding voting securities. As
a result, Goldman has the potential ability to exert influence over
both the actions of the Board of Directors and the outcome of
issues requiring approval by the Company’s
shareholders. This concentration of ownership may have effects
such as delaying or preventing a change in control of the Company
that may be favored by other shareholders or preventing
transactions in which shareholders might otherwise recover a
premium for their shares over current market
prices.
Our corporate
documents and Delaware law contain provisions that could
discourage, delay or prevent a change in control of the
Company.
Provisions
in our certificate of incorporation and bylaws may discourage,
delay or prevent a merger or acquisition involving us that our
stockholders may consider favorable. For example, our certificate
of incorporation authorizes preferred stock, which carries special
rights, including voting and dividend rights. With these rights,
preferred stockholders could make it more difficult for a third
party to acquire us.
We
are also subject to the anti-takeover provisions of Section 203 of
the Delaware General Corporation Law. Under these provisions, if
anyone becomes an “interested stockholder,” we may not
enter into a “business combination” with that person
for three years without special approval, which could discourage a
third party from making a takeover offer and could delay or prevent
a change of control. For purposes of Section 203, “interested
stockholder” means, generally, someone owning 15% or more of
our outstanding voting stock or an affiliate of ours that owned 15%
or more of our outstanding voting stock during the past three
years, subject to certain exceptions as described in Section
203.
We do not expect
to pay cash dividends on our Common Stock for the foreseeable
future.
We
have never paid cash dividends on our Common Stock and do not
anticipate that any cash dividends will be paid on the Common Stock
for the foreseeable future. The payment of any cash dividend by us
will be at the discretion of our Board of Directors and will depend
on, among other things, our earnings, capital, regulatory
requirements and financial condition. Furthermore, the terms of our
Series A Preferred and Series B Preferred directly limit our
ability to pay cash dividends on our Common Stock.
None.
Our
corporate headquarters are located in San Diego, California, where
we occupy 9,927 square feet of office space. This facility is
leased through October 2018 at a cost of approximately $30,000 per
month. In addition to our corporate headquarters, we also occupied
the following spaces at December 31, 2017:
●
1,508 square feet in Ottawa, Province of Ontario, Canada, at a cost
of approximately $3,000 per month until the expiration of the lease
on March 31, 2021. This lease was renewed in April 2016 for a
five-year period ending on March 31, 2021. Renewal terms were
substantially unchanged from the existing lease;
●
9,720 square feet in Portland, Oregon, at a cost of approximately
$21,000 per month until the expiration of the lease on December 31,
2021. This lease was renewed in September 2017, resulting in an
additional 1,675 feet, an increase from approximately $18,000 to
approximately $21,000 per month and the extension of the term from
October 2018 to December 2021; and
●
304 square feet of office space in Mexico City, Mexico, at a cost
of approximately $3,000 per month until November 30,
2018.
There is currently no action, suit, proceeding, inquiry or
investigation before or by any court, public board, government
agency, self-regulatory organization or body pending or, to the
knowledge of the executive officers of the Company or any of our
subsidiaries, threatened against or affecting the Company, our
Common Stock, any of our subsidiaries or of the Company’s or
our subsidiaries’ officers or directors in their capacities
as such, in which an adverse decision could have a material adverse
effect.
None.
PART II
ITEM 5.
|
MARKET
FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
|
Market Information
Our
Common Stock does not trade on an established securities exchange.
Our Common Stock is quoted under the symbol “IWSY” on
the OTCQB marketplace. The following table sets forth the high and
low sale prices for our Common Stock for each quarter in 2017 and
2016:
2017 Fiscal Quarters
|
High
|
Low
|
First
Quarter
|
$1.39
|
$0.98
|
Second
Quarter
|
$1.24
|
$0.81
|
Third
Quarter
|
$1.50
|
$0.83
|
Fourth
Quarter
|
$1.62
|
$1.25
|
|
|
|
2016 Fiscal Quarters
|
High
|
Low
|
First
Quarter
|
$1.49
|
$0.85
|
Second
Quarter
|
$1.52
|
$1.06
|
Third
Quarter
|
$1.47
|
$1.12
|
Fourth
Quarter
|
$1.35
|
$0.95
|
Holders
As
of March 8, 2018, we had approximately 198 holders of record of our
Common Stock. A significant number of our shares were held in
street name and, as such, we believe that the actual number of
beneficial owners is significantly higher.
Stock Performance Graph
The
following graph compares the cumulative total shareholder return on
our Common Stock over the five-year period ending December 31, 2017
with the cumulative total returns during the same period on the
NASDAQ Composite Index and the S&P Information Technology
Index. The graph assumes that $100 was invested on
December 31, 2012 in our Common Stock and in the shares
represented by each of the other indices, and that all dividends
were reinvested.
The
stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily
indicative of future stock price performance.
|
12/31/12
|
12/31/13
|
12/31/14
|
12/31/15
|
12/31/16
|
12/31/17
|
ImageWare
Systems, Inc.
|
$106.25
|
$241.25
|
$300.00
|
$162.50
|
$166.25
|
$198.75
|
NASDAQ
Composite Index
|
$115.91
|
$160.32
|
$181.80
|
$192.21
|
$206.63
|
$264.99
|
S&P
Information Technology
|
$114.82
|
$147.47
|
$177.13
|
$187.63
|
$213.61
|
$296.56
|
The stock performance graph above shall not be deemed incorporated
by reference into any filing by us under the Securities Act of
1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, except to the extent that we specifically incorporate such
information by reference, and shall not otherwise be deemed filed
under such Acts.
Dividends
We
have never declared or paid cash dividends on our Common Stock. We
currently intend to retain all available funds and any future
earnings for use in the operation of our business and do not
anticipate paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable future. Any
future determination to declare cash dividends will be made at the
discretion of our Board of Directors and will depend on our
financial condition, results of operations, capital requirements,
general business conditions and other factors that our Board of
Directors may deem relevant.
As
of December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, the Company had cumulative
undeclared dividends of approximately $0 relating to our Series A
Preferred, and $8,000 relating to our Series B
Preferred.
Securities Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation
Plans
For
a discussion of our equity compensation plans, please see Item 11
of this Annual Report.
The
following data has been derived from our audited consolidated
financial statements, including the consolidated balance sheets at
December 31, 2017 and 2016 and the related consolidated statements
of operations for the three years ended December 31, 2017 and
related notes appearing elsewhere in this report. The statement of
operations data for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 and
the balance sheet data as of December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013 are
derived from our audited consolidated financial statements that are
not included in this report. You should read the selected financial
data set forth below in conjunction with “Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations” and our financial statements and related notes
included elsewhere in this report.
Statement of Operations Data:
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
||||
(In
thousands, except share and per share data)
|
2017
|
2016
|
2015
|
2014
|
2013
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product
|
$1,614
|
$1,249
|
$2,192
|
$1,634
|
$2,686
|
Maintenance
|
2,679
|
2,563
|
2,577
|
2,525
|
2,618
|
|
4,293
|
3,812
|
4,769
|
4,159
|
5,304
|
Cost of revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product
|
152
|
243
|
1,117
|
257
|
319
|
Maintenance
|
839
|
827
|
827
|
735
|
771
|
Gross
profit
|
3,302
|
2,742
|
2,825
|
3,167
|
4,214
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
General
and administrative
|
4,192
|
3,722
|
3,437
|
3,818
|
3,378
|
Sales
and marketing
|
2,816
|
3,021
|
2,791
|
2,471
|
2,129
|
Research
and development
|
5,953
|
5,332
|
4,643
|
4,495
|
3,869
|
Depreciation
and amortization
|
68
|
129
|
164
|
179
|
125
|
|
13,029
|
12,204
|
11,035
|
10,963
|
9,501
|
Loss
from operations
|
(9,727)
|
(9,462)
|
(8,210)
|
(7,796)
|
(5,287)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
expense
|
591
|
245
|
447
|
416
|
221
|
Change
in fair value of derivative liabilities
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
4,776
|
Other
income, net
|
(125)
|
(201)
|
(145)
|
(297)
|
(443)
|
Loss
before income taxes
|
(10,193)
|
(9,506)
|
(8,512)
|
(7,915)
|
(9,841)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income
tax expense (benefit)
|
(124)
|
21
|
22
|
25
|
8
|
Net
loss
|
$(10,069)
|
$(9,527)
|
$(8,534)
|
$(7,940)
|
$(9,849)
|
Preferred
dividends
|
(2,400)
|
(1,347)
|
(1,065)
|
(51)
|
(51)
|
Preferred
stock exchange
|
(1,245)
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
Net
loss available to common shareholders
|
$(13,714)
|
$(10,874)
|
$(9,599)
|
$(7,991)
|
$(9,900)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
and diluted loss per common share
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
loss
|
$(0.11)
|
$(0.10)
|
$(0.09)
|
$(0.09)
|
$(0.12)
|
Preferred
dividends
|
(0.03)
|
(0.02)
|
(0.01)
|
—
|
—
|
Preferred
stock exchange
|
(0.01)
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
Basic
and diluted loss per share available to common
shareholders
|
$(0.15)
|
$(0.12)
|
$(0.10)
|
$(0.09)
|
$(0.12)
|
Basic
and diluted weighted-average shares outstanding
|
92,816,723
|
94,426,783
|
93,786,079
|
91,795,971
|
81,231,962
|
Balance Sheet Data:
|
December 31,
|
||||
(In
thousands, except share and per share data)
|
2017
|
2016
|
2015
|
2014
|
2013
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
$7,317
|
$1,586
|
$3,352
|
$218
|
$2,363
|
Accounts
receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts
|
458
|
287
|
349
|
266
|
302
|
Inventory,
net
|
79
|
23
|
46
|
916
|
505
|
Other
current assets
|
163
|
135
|
69
|
86
|
148
|
Total
Current Assets
|
8,017
|
2,031
|
3,816
|
1,486
|
3,318
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property
and equipment, net
|
43
|
93
|
162
|
211
|
245
|
Other
assets
|
35
|
34
|
98
|
153
|
395
|
Intangible
assets, net of accumulated amortization
|
93
|
106
|
117
|
144
|
172
|
Goodwill
|
3,416
|
3,416
|
3,416
|
3,416
|
3,416
|
Total Assets
|
$11,604
|
$5,680
|
$7,609
|
$5,410
|
$7,546
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts
payable
|
$457
|
$425
|
$198
|
$459
|
$486
|
Deferred
revenue
|
1,016
|
1,045
|
1,059
|
1,827
|
1,662
|
Accrued
expenses
|
1,185
|
1,047
|
1,149
|
1,013
|
924
|
Derivative
liabilities
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
57
|
Convertible
lines of credit to related parties, net
|
5,774
|
2,528
|
—
|
—
|
55
|
Total
Current Liabilities
|
8,432
|
5,045
|
2,406
|
3,299
|
3,184
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Convertible
secured notes payable, net of discount
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
1,311
|
—
|
Pension
obligation
|
2,024
|
1,895
|
1,511
|
1,834
|
1,031
|
Total
Liabilities
|
10,456
|
6,940
|
3,917
|
6,444
|
4,215
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders’
Equity (Deficit):
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred
stock, authorized 4,000,000 shares:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series
A Convertible Redeemable Preferred Stock, $0.01 par
value
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
Series
B Convertible Redeemable Preferred Stock, $0.01 par
value
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
Series
E Convertible Redeemable Preferred stock, $0.01 par
value
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
Series
F Convertible Redeemable Preferred stock, $0.01 par
value
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
Series
G Convertible Redeemable Preferred stock, $0.01 par
value
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
Common
Stock, $0.01 par value
|
941
|
917
|
940
|
934
|
874
|
Additional
paid-in capital
|
172,414
|
156,195
|
149,902
|
135,982
|
131,652
|
Treasury
stock, at cost
|
(64)
|
(64)
|
(64)
|
(64)
|
(64)
|
Accumulated
other comprehensive loss
|
(1,664)
|
(1,543)
|
(1,195)
|
(1,594)
|
(830)
|
Accumulated
deficit
|
(170,481)
|
(156,767)
|
(145,893)
|
(136,294)
|
(128,303)
|
Total
Shareholders’ Equity (Deficit)
|
1,148
|
(1,260)
|
3,692
|
(1,034)
|
3,331
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity
(Deficit)
|
$11,604
|
$5,680
|
$7,609
|
$5,410
|
$7,546
|
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our
consolidated financial statements and the related notes and other
financial information appearing elsewhere in this Form 10-K.
Readers are also urged to carefully review and consider the various
disclosures made by us which attempt to advise interested parties
of the factors which affect our business, including (without
limitation) the disclosures made under the captions
“Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations” and “Risk
Factors,” and in the audited consolidated financial
statements and related notes included in this Annual Report on Form
10-K.
Overview
The
Company is a pioneer and leader in the emerging market for
biometrically enabled software-based identity management solutions.
Using those human characteristics that are unique to us all, we
create software that provides a highly reliable indication of a
person’s identity. Our “flagship” product is our
patented IWS Biometric Engine®. Scalable for small city
business or worldwide deployment, our IWS Biometric Engine is a
multi-biometric software platform that is hardware and algorithm
independent, enabling the enrollment and management of unlimited
population sizes. It allows a user to utilize one or more
biometrics on a seamlessly integrated platform. Our products are
used to manage and issue secure credentials, including national
IDs, passports, driver licenses and access control credentials. Our
products also provide law enforcement with integrated mug shot,
LiveScan fingerprint and investigative capabilities. We also
provide comprehensive authentication security software using
biometrics to secure physical and logical access to facilities or
computer networks or Internet sites. Biometric technology is now an
integral part of all markets we address and all of our products are
integrated into the IWS Biometric Engine.
With
the advent of cloud-based computing and the proliferation of smart
mobile devices, which allow for reliable biometric capture and the
need to secure access to data, products and services, the Company
believes that the market for multi-biometric solutions will expand
to encompass significant deployments of biometric systems in the
commercial and consumer markets. The Company therefore intends to
leverage the strength of its experience servicing existing
government clients who have deployed the Company’s products
for large populations, as well as its foundational patent portfolio
in the field of multi-modal biometrics and the fusion of multiple
biometric algorithms, to address the growing commercial and
consumer market.
Our
biometric technology is a core software component of an
organization’s security infrastructure and includes a
multi-biometric identity management solution for enrolling,
managing, identifying and verifying the identities of people by the
physical characteristics of the human body. We develop, sell and
support various identity management capabilities within government
(federal, state and local), law enforcement, commercial
enterprises, and transportation and aviation markets for
identification and verification purposes. Our IWS Biometric Engine
is a patented biometric identity management software platform for
multi-biometric enrollment, management and authentication, managing
population databases of virtually unlimited sizes. It is hardware
agnostic and can utilize different types of biometric algorithms.
It allows different types of biometrics to be operated at the same
time on a seamlessly integrated platform. It is also offered as an
SDK based search engine, enabling developers and system integrators
to implement a biometric solution or integrate biometric
capabilities into existing applications without having to derive
biometric functionality from pre-existing applications. The IWS
Biometric Engine combined with our secure credential platform, IWS
EPI Builder, provides a comprehensive, integrated biometric and
secure credential solution that can be leveraged for high-end
applications such as passports, driver licenses, national IDs, and
other secure documents.
Our
law enforcement solutions enable agencies to quickly capture,
archive, search, retrieve, and share digital images, fingerprints
and other biometrics as well as criminal history records on a
stand-alone, networked, wireless or web-based platform. We develop,
sell and support a suite of modular software products used by law
enforcement and public safety agencies to create and manage
criminal history records and to investigate crime. Our IWS Law
Enforcement solution consists of five software modules: Capture and
Investigative modules, which provide a criminal booking system with
related databases as well as the ability to create and print mug
photo/SMT image lineups and electronic mugbooks; a Facial
Recognition module, which uses biometric facial recognition to
identify suspects; a Web module, which provides access to centrally
stored records over the Internet in a connected or wireless
fashion; and a LiveScan module, which incorporates LiveScan
capabilities into IWS Law Enforcement providing integrated
fingerprint and palm print biometric management for civil and law
enforcement use. The IWS Biometric Engine is also available to our
law enforcement clients and allows them to capture and search using
other biometrics such as iris or DNA.
Our
secure credential solutions empower customers to create secure and
smart digital identification documents with complete ID systems. We
develop, sell and support software and design systems which utilize
digital imaging and biometrics in the production of photo
identification cards, credentials and identification systems. Our
products in this market consist of IWS EPI Suite and IWS EPI
Builder. These products allow for the production of digital
identification cards and related databases and records and can be
used by, among others, schools, airports, hospitals, corporations
or governments. We have added the ability to incorporate multiple
biometrics into the ID systems with the integration of IWS
Biometric Engine to our secure credential product
line.
Our enterprise authentication software includes
the IWS Desktop Security product, which is a comprehensive
authentication management infrastructure solution providing added
layers of security to workstations, networks and systems through
advanced encryption and authentication technologies. IWS Desktop
Security is optimized to enhance network security and usability,
and uses multi-factor authentication methods to protect access,
verify identity and help secure the computing environment without
sacrificing ease-of-use features such as quick login. Additionally,
IWS Desktop Security provides an easy integration with various
smart card-based credentials including the Common Access Card
(“CAC”), Homeland Security Presidential Directive
12 (“HSPD-12”), Personal Identity Verification
(“PIV”) credential, and Transportation Worker
Identification Credential (“TWIC”) with an organization’s access
control process. IWS Desktop Security provides the crucial
end-point component of a Logical Access Control System
(“LACS”), and when combined with a Physical Access
Control System (“PACS”), organizations benefit from a complete
door to desktop access control and security
model.
Critical Accounting Estimates
The discussion and analysis of our consolidated
financial condition and results of operations are based on our
consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in
accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America (“GAAP”). The preparation of these consolidated
financial statements in accordance with GAAP requires us to utilize
accounting policies and make certain estimates and assumptions that
affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the
disclosure of contingencies as of the date of the consolidated
financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and
expenses during a fiscal period. The SEC considers an accounting
policy to be critical if it is important to a company’s
financial condition and results of operations, and if it requires
significant judgment and estimates on the part of management in its
application.
Significant
estimates include the allowance for doubtful accounts receivable,
inventory carrying values, deferred tax asset valuation allowances,
accounting for loss contingencies, recoverability of goodwill and
acquired intangible assets and amortization periods, assumptions
used in the Black-Scholes model to calculate the fair value of
share based payments, assumptions used in the application of fair
value methodologies to calculate the fair value differential of the
Preferred Stock Exchange, revenue and cost of revenues recognized
under the percentage of completion method and assumptions used in
the application of fair value methodologies to calculate the fair
value of pension assets and obligations.
The
following are our critical accounting policies because we believe
they are both important to the portrayal of our financial condition
and results of operations and require critical management judgments
and estimates about matters that are uncertain. If actual results
or events differ materially from those contemplated by us in making
these estimates, our reported financial condition and results of
operations for future periods could be materially
affected.
Revenue
Recognition. Our
revenue recognition policy is significant because our revenue is a
key component of our consolidated results of operations. We
recognize revenue from the following major revenue
sources:
●
Long-term fixed-price contracts involving significant
customization;
●
Fixed-price contracts involving minimal customization;
●
Software licensing;
●
Sales of computer hardware and identification media;
and
●
Post-contract customer support
(“PCS”).
The Company’s revenue recognition policies
are consistent with GAAP including Financial Accounting Standards
Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification
(“ASC”) 985-605, “Software Revenue
Recognition,” ASC
605-35 “Revenue Recognition,
Construction-Type and Production-Type Contracts,” “Securities and Exchange
Commission Staff Accounting Bulletin 104,”
and ASC 605-25,
“Revenue Recognition, Multiple
Element Arrangements.”
Accordingly, the Company recognizes revenue when all of the
following criteria are met: persuasive evidence of an arrangement
exists, delivery has occurred or services have been rendered, the
fee is fixed or determinable, and collectability is reasonably
assured.
The Company recognizes revenue and profit as work
progresses on long-term, fixed-price contracts involving
significant amounts of hardware and software customization using
the percentage of completion method based on costs incurred to
date, compared to total estimated costs upon completion. The
primary components of costs incurred are third party software and
direct labor cost including fringe benefits. Revenues
recognized in excess of amounts billed are classified as current
assets under “Costs and estimated earnings in excess of
billings on uncompleted contracts.” Amounts billed to
customers in excess of revenue recognized are classified as current
liabilities under “Billings in excess of costs and estimated
earnings on uncompleted contracts.” Revenue from contracts
for which the Company cannot reliably estimate total costs, or
there are not significant amounts of customization, are recognized
upon completion. For contracts that
require significant amounts of customization that the Company
accounts for under the completed contract method of revenue
recognition, the Company defers revenue recognition until customer
acceptance is received. For contracts containing either extended or
dependent payment terms, revenue recognition is deferred until such
time as payment has been received by the Company.
The Company also generates
non-recurring revenue from the licensing of its software. Software
license revenue is recognized upon the execution of a license
agreement, upon deliverance, when fees are fixed and determinable,
when collectability is probable and when all other significant
obligations have been fulfilled. The Company also generates revenue
from the sale of computer hardware and identification media.
Revenue for these items is recognized upon delivery of these
products to the customer. The Company’s revenue from periodic
maintenance agreements is generally recognized ratably over the
respective maintenance periods provided no significant obligations
remain and collectability of the related receivable is probable.
Amounts collected in advance for maintenance services are included
in current liabilities under “Deferred
revenues.” Sales tax collected from customers is
excluded from revenue.
Allowance
for Doubtful Accounts. We provide an allowance for our accounts
receivable for estimated losses that may result from our
customers’ inability to pay. We determine the amount of
allowance by analyzing historical losses, customer concentrations,
customer creditworthiness, current economic trends, and the age of
the accounts receivable balances and changes in our customer
payment terms when evaluating the adequacy of the allowance for
doubtful accounts.
Valuation
of Goodwill, Other Intangible and Long-Lived
Assets. The Company
accounts for its intangible assets under the provisions of ASC 350,
“Intangibles - Goodwill and
Other.” In accordance
with ASC 350, intangible assets with a definite life are analyzed
for impairment under ASC 360-10-05 and intangible assets with an
indefinite life are analyzed for impairment under ASC 360. In
accordance with ASC 350, goodwill, or the excess of cost over fair
value of net assets acquired is tested for impairment using a fair
value approach at the “reporting unit” level. A
reporting unit is the operating segment, or a business one level
below that operating segment (referred to as a component) if
discrete financial information is prepared and regularly reviewed
by management at the component level. The Company’s reporting
unit is at the entity level. The Company recognizes an impairment
charge for any amount by which the carrying amount of a reporting
unit’s goodwill exceeds its fair value. The Company uses fair
value methodologies to establish fair values.
We
assess impairment of goodwill and identifiable intangible assets
whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the
carrying value may not be recoverable. Factors we consider
important which could trigger an impairment review include the
following:
●
Significant underperformance relative to historical or expected
future operating results;
●
Significant changes in the manner of our use of the acquired assets
or the strategy of our overall business; and
●
Significant negative industry or economic trends.
The
Company annually, or more frequently if events or circumstances
indicate a need, tests the carrying amount of goodwill for
impairment. The Company performs its annual impairment test in the
fourth quarter of each year. A two-step impairment test is used to
first identify potential goodwill impairment and then measure the
amount of goodwill impairment loss, if any. The first step was
conducted by determining and comparing the fair value, employing
the market approach, of the Company’s reporting units to the
carrying value of the reporting unit. The Company determined that
its only reporting unit is Identity Management. Based on the
results of this impairment test, the Company determined that its
goodwill assets were not impaired as of December 31,
2017.
The
Company evaluates long-lived assets for impairment whenever events
or changes in circumstances indicate their net book value may not
be recoverable. When such factors and circumstances exist, the
Company compares the projected undiscounted future cash flows
associated with the related asset or group of assets over their
estimated useful lives against their respective carrying amount.
Impairment, if any, is based on the excess of the carrying amount
over the fair value, based on market value when available, or
discounted expected cash flows, of those assets and is recorded in
the period in which the determination is made. The Company’s
management currently believes there is no impairment of its
long-lived assets. There can be no assurance, however, that market
conditions will not change or demand for the Company’s
products under development will continue. Either of these could
result in future impairment of long-lived assets.
There
are many management assumptions and estimates underlying the
determination of an impairment loss, and estimates using different,
but reasonable, assumptions could produce significantly different
results. Significant assumptions include estimates of future levels
of revenues and operating expenses. Therefore, the timing and
recognition of impairment losses by us in the future, if any, may
be highly dependent upon our estimates and assumptions. There can
be no assurance that goodwill impairment will not occur in the
future.
Stock-Based
Compensation. At
December 31, 2017, the Company had one stock-based compensation
plan for employees and nonemployee directors, which authorize the
granting of various equity-based incentives including stock options
and restricted stock.
The Company estimates the fair value of its stock
options using a Black-Scholes option-pricing model, consistent with
the provisions of ASC 718, “Compensation – Stock
Compensation.” The fair
value of stock options granted is recognized to expense over the
requisite service period. Stock-based compensation expense for all
share-based payment awards is recognized using the straight-line
single-option method. Stock-based compensation expense is reported
in general and administrative, sales and marketing, engineering and
customer service expenses based upon the departments to which
substantially all of the associated employees report and credited
to additional paid-in capital.
ASC 718 requires the use of a valuation model to
calculate the fair value of stock-based awards. For the years ended
December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, the Company has elected to use
the Black-Scholes option-pricing model, which incorporates various
assumptions including volatility, expected life, and interest
rates. The Company is required to make various assumptions in the
application of the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The Company
has determined that the best measure of expected volatility is
based on the historical weekly volatility of the Company’s
Common Stock. Historical volatility factors utilized in the
Company’s Black-Scholes computations for options granted
during the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 ranged
from 58% to 103%.
The Company has elected to estimate
the expected life of an award based upon the SEC approved
“simplified method” noted under the provisions of Staff
Accounting Bulletin No. 110. The expected term used by the
Company to value the grants issued in 2017, 2016 and 2015 as
computed by this method was 5.17 years. The effect of the
difference between the actual historical expected life and the
simplified method was immaterial. The interest rate used is
the risk-free interest rate and is based upon U.S. Treasury rates
appropriate for the expected term. Interest rates used in the
Company’s Black-Scholes calculations were 2.6% for the years
ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015. Dividend yield is
zero, as the Company does not expect to declare any dividends on
the Company’s common shares in the foreseeable
future.
In
addition to the key assumptions used in the Black-Scholes model,
the estimated forfeiture rate at the time of valuation is a
critical assumption. The Company has estimated an annualized
forfeiture rate of approximately 0% for corporate officers, 4.1%
for members of the Board of Directors and 6.0% for all other
employees. The Company reviews the expected forfeiture rate
annually to determine if that percent is still reasonable based on
historical experience.
Income
Taxes. The Company accounts for
income taxes in accordance with ASC 740, “Accounting for Income
Taxes.” Deferred income taxes are recognized for the tax
consequences related to temporary differences between the carrying
amount of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes
and the amounts used for tax purposes at each year-end, based on
enacted tax laws and statutory tax rates applicable to the periods
in which the differences are expected to affect taxable income. A
valuation allowance is established when necessary based on the
weight of available evidence, if it is considered more likely than
not that all or some portion of the deferred tax assets will not be
realized. Income tax expense is the sum of current income tax plus
the change in deferred tax assets and
liabilities.
ASC
740-10 requires a company to first determine whether it is
more-likely-than-not (defined as a likelihood of more than fifty
percent) that a tax position will be sustained based on its
technical merits as of the reporting date, assuming that taxing
authorities will examine the position and have full knowledge of
all relevant information. A tax position that meets this
more-likely-than-not threshold is then measured and recognized at
the largest amount of benefit that is greater than fifty percent
likely to be realized upon effective settlement with a taxing
authority.
We recognize and measure uncertain tax positions in accordance with
GAAP, pursuant to which we only recognize the tax benefit from an
uncertain tax position if it is more likely than not that the tax
position will be sustained on examination by the taxing
authorities, based on the technical merits of the position. Any tax
benefits recognized in the consolidated financial statements from
such positions are then measured based on the largest benefit that
has a greater than fifty percent likelihood of being realized upon
ultimate settlement. We report a liability for unrecognized tax
benefits resulting from uncertain tax positions taken or expected
to be taken in a tax return. GAAP further requires that a change in
judgment related to the expected ultimate resolution of uncertain
tax positions be recognized in earnings in the quarter of such
change. We recognize interest and penalties, if any, related to
unrecognized tax benefits in income tax
expense.
We
file annual income tax returns in multiple taxing jurisdictions
around the world. A number of years may elapse before an uncertain
tax position is audited and finally resolved. While it is often
difficult to predict the final outcome or the timing of resolution
of any particular uncertain tax position, we believe that our
analysis of income tax reserves reflects the most likely outcome.
We adjust these reserves, if any, as well as the related interest,
in light of changing facts and circumstances. Settlement of any
particular position could require the use of cash.
Significant
judgment is required in evaluating the Company’s uncertain
tax positions and determining the Company’s provision for
income taxes. No assurance can be given that the final tax outcome
of these matters will not be different from that which is reflected
in the Company’s historical income tax provisions and
accruals. The Company adjusts these items in light of changing
facts and circumstances. To the extent that the final tax
outcome of these matters is different than the amounts recorded,
such differences will impact the provision for income taxes in the
period in which such determination is made.
The Internal Revenue Code (the
“Code”) limits the availability of certain tax
credits and net operating losses that arose prior to certain
cumulative changes in a corporation’s ownership resulting in
a change of control of the Company. The Company’s use of
its net operating loss carryforwards and tax credit carryforwards
will be significantly limited because the Company believes it
underwent “ownership changes,” as defined under Section
382 of the Internal Revenue Code, in 1991, 1995, 2000, 2003, 2004,
2011 and 2012, though the Company has not performed a study to
determine the limitation. The Company has reduced its deferred
tax assets to zero relating to its federal and state research
credits because of such limitations. The Company continues to
disclose the tax effect of the net operating loss carryforwards at
their original amount as the actual limitation has not yet been
quantified. The Company has also established a full valuation
allowance for substantially all deferred tax assets due to
uncertainties surrounding its ability to generate future taxable
income to realize these assets. Since substantially all deferred
tax assets are fully reserved, future changes in tax benefits will
not impact the effective tax rate. Management periodically
evaluates the recoverability of the deferred tax assets. If it is
determined at some time in the future that it is more likely than
not that deferred tax assets will be realized, the valuation
allowance would be reduced accordingly at that
time.
Fair-Value
Measurements. The Company accounts for fair value measurements
in accordance with ASC 820, “Fair Value Measurements and
Disclosures,” which
defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair
value in generally accepted accounting principles, and expands
disclosures about fair value
measurements.
ASC
820 establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs
to valuation techniques used to measure fair value. The hierarchy
gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active
markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1 measurements)
and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3
measurements). The three levels of the fair value hierarchy under
ASC 820 are described below:
|
Level 1
|
Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at
the measurement date for identical, unrestricted assets or
liabilities.
|
|
|
|
|
Level 2
|
Applies to assets or liabilities for which there are inputs other
than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for
the asset or liability such as quoted prices for similar assets or
liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical assets
or liabilities in markets with insufficient volume or infrequent
transactions (less active markets); or model-derived valuations in
which significant inputs are observable or can be derived
principally from, or corroborated by, observable market
data.
|
|
|
|
|
Level 3
|
Prices or valuation techniques that require inputs that are both
significant to the fair value measurement and unobservable
(supported by little or no market activity).
|
Assessing
the significance of a particular input to the fair value
measurement requires judgment, considering factors specific to the
asset or liability. Determining whether a fair value
measurement is based on Level 1, Level 2, or Level 3 inputs is
important because certain disclosures are applicable only to those
fair value measurements that use Level 3 inputs. The use of
Level 3 inputs may include information derived through
extrapolation or interpolation which involves management
assumptions.
For
a detailed discussion on the application of these and other
accounting policies, see Note 2 in the Notes to the Consolidated
Financial Statements.
Results of Operations
This
management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition
and results of operations should be read in conjunction with the
consolidated financial statements and related notes contained
elsewhere in this Annual Report.
Comparison of Results for Fiscal Years Ended December 31, 2017,
2016 and 2015
Product Revenue
Net Product Revenue
(dollars in thousands)
|
Year Ended
December 31,
2017
|
$
Change
|
%
Change
|
Year Ended
December 31,
2016
|
$
Change
|
%
Change
|
Year Ended
December 31,
2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Software
and royalties
|
$1,248
|
$391
|
46%
|
$857
|
$(744)
|
(46)%
|
$1,601
|
Percentage of total net product revenue
|
77%
|
|
|
69%
|
|
|
73%
|
Hardware
and consumables
|
$94
|
$26
|
38%
|
$68
|
$34
|
100%
|
$34
|
Percentage of total net product revenue
|
6%
|
|
|
5%
|
|
|
2%
|
Services
|
$272
|
$(52)
|
(16)%
|
$324
|
$(233)
|
(42)%
|
$557
|
Percentage of total net product revenue
|
17%
|
|
|
26%
|
|
|
25%
|
Total
net product revenue
|
$1,614
|
$365
|
29%
|
$1,249
|
$(943)
|
(43)%
|
$2,192
|
Software and royalty revenue increased 46% or
approximately $391,000 during the year ended December 31, 2017 as
compared to the corresponding period in 2016. This increase is due
to higher project related sales of our identity management software
of approximately $397,000, higher sales of boxed identity
management software sold through our distribution channel of
approximately $5,000, higher law enforcement project revenue of
approximately $8,000 offset by lower royalty revenue of
approximately $19,000.
Software
and royalty revenue decreased 46% or approximately $744,000 during
the year ended December 31, 2016 as compared to the corresponding
period in 2015. This decrease is due to lower project related sales
of our identity management software of approximately $542,000,
lower sales of boxed identity management software sold through our
distribution channel of approximately $93,000, lower royalty
revenue of approximately $84,000 and lower law enforcement project
revenue of approximately $25,000.
Revenue from the sale of hardware and consumables
increased 38% or approximately $26,000 during the year ended
December 31, 2017 as compared to the corresponding period in
2016. This increase resulted
from higher sales of hardware and consumables in project
solutions.
During
the 2016 period, revenue from the sale of hardware and consumables
increased 100% or approximately $34,000 as compared to the
corresponding period in 2015. This increase resulted from
higher sales of hardware and consumables in project
solutions.
Services revenue is comprised primarily of
software integration services, system installation services and
customer training. Such revenue decreased 16% or approximately
$52,000 during the year ended December 31, 2017 as compared to the
corresponding period in 2016, due primarily to the
completion of the service element in identity management project
solutions in the 2015 period.
Services revenue decreased 42% or
approximately $233,000 during the year ended December 31, 2016 as
compared to the corresponding period in 2015, due
primarily to the completion
of the service elements in certain identity management project
solutions.
We believe that the period-to-period fluctuations
of identity management software revenue in project-oriented
solutions are largely due to the timing of government procurement
with respect to the various programs we are pursuing. Although
no assurances can be given, based on management’s current
visibility into the timing of potential government procurements and
potential partnerships and current pilot programs, we
believe that we will see an increase in government procurement and
implementations with respect to identity management initiatives
during 2018; however, government procurement initiatives,
implementations and pilots are frequently delayed and extended, as
was the case in the year ended December 31, 2017, and we cannot
predict the timing of such initiatives.
During the year
ended December 31, 2017, we continued our efforts to move the
Biometric Engine into cloud and mobile markets and to expand our
end-user market into non-government sectors including commercial,
consumer and healthcare applications. Our approach to the
markets we serve is to partner with larger integrators as resellers
who have both the infrastructure and resources to sell into the
worldwide market. We rely upon these partners for guidance as to
when they expect revenues for our products to begin to ramp. For
those opportunities that are approaching implementation, we are
being told by our partners that we should expect revenues to
commence in the first quarter of
2018.
Maintenance Revenue
Net Maintenance Revenue
(dollars in thousands)
|
Year Ended
December 31,
2017
|
$
Change
|
%
Change
|
Year Ended
December 31,
2016
|
$
Change
|
%
Change
|
Year Ended
December 31,
2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maintenance
Revenue
|
$2,679
|
116
|
5%
|
$2,563
|
(14)
|
(1)%
|
$2,577
|
Maintenance
revenue was approximately $2,679,000 for the year ended December
31, 2017, as compared to approximately $2,563,000 and $2,577,000
for the corresponding periods in 2016 and 2015,
respectively. For the year ended December 31, 2017, identity
management maintenance revenue was approximately $1,311,000 as
compared to $1,181,000 for the comparable period in 2016. The
increase in identity management maintenance revenue of
approximately $130,000 reflects the expansion of our installed
base. Law enforcement maintenance revenue was approximately
$1,368,000 for the twelve months ended December 2017 as compared to
$1,382,000 for the comparable period in 2016. This decrease of
approximately $14,000 is primarily due to the expiration of certain
law enforcement maintenance contracts.
For
the year ended December 31, 2016, maintenance revenue decreased
approximately $14,000 as compared to the comparable period in 2015.
For the year ended December 31, 2016, identity management
maintenance revenue was approximately $1,181,000 as compared to
$1,114,000 for the comparable period in 2015. The increase in
identity management revenue of approximately $67,000 reflects the
expansion of our installed base. Law enforcement maintenance
revenue was approximately $1,382,000 for the twelve months ended
December 31, 2016 as compared to $1,463,000 for the comparable
period in 2015. This decrease of approximately $81,000 is primarily
due to the expiration of certain law enforcement maintenance
contracts.
We
anticipate growth of our maintenance revenue through the retention
of existing customers combined with the continued expansion of our
installed base resulting from the completion of project-oriented
work, however we cannot predict the timing of this anticipated
growth.
Cost of Product Revenue
Cost of Product
Revenue
(dollars in thousands)
|
Year Ended
December 31,
2017
|
$
Change
|
%
Change
|
Year Ended
December 31,
2016
|
$
Change
|
%
Change
|
Year Ended
December 31,
2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Software
and royalties
|
$39
|
$(39)
|
(50)%
|
$78
|
$(11)
|
(12)%
|
$89
|
Percentage of software and royalty product revenue
|
3%
|
|
|
9%
|
|
|
6%
|
Hardware
and consumables
|
$64
|
$21
|
49%
|
$43
|
$(2)
|
(4)%
|
$45
|
Percentage of hardware and consumables product revenue
|
68%
|
|
|
63%
|
|
|
132%
|
Services
|
$49
|
$(73)
|
(60)%
|
$122
|
$(861)
|
(88)%
|
$983
|
Percentage of services product revenue
|
18%
|
|
|
39%
|
|
|
176%
|
Total
cost of product revenue
|
$152
|
$(91)
|
(37)%
|
$243
|
$(874)
|
(78)%
|
$1,117
|
Percentage of total product revenue
|
9%
|
|
|
20%
|
|
|
51%
|
The
cost of software and royalty product revenue decreased
approximately $39,000 during the year ended December 31, 2017 as
compared to the corresponding period in 2016. The cost of software
and royalty revenue decreased approximately $11,000 during the year
ended December 31, 2016 as compared to the corresponding period in
2015. This decrease is due primarily to decreases in third
party software costs despite higher sales of software. In addition
to changes in costs of software and royalty product revenue caused
by revenue level fluctuations, costs of products can vary as a
percentage of product revenue from period to period depending upon
level of software customization and third-party software license
content included in product sales during a given
period.
The cost of product
revenue for our hardware and consumable sales during the year ended
December 31, 2017 increased approximately $21,000 as compared to
the corresponding period in 2016, due primarily to higher hardware
and consumable revenue of approximately $26,000. During the year ended
December 31, 2016, our cost of product revenue for our hardware and
consumable sales decreased by approximately $2,000, as compared to the
corresponding period in 2015 despite higher hardware and consumable
revenue of approximately $34,000 primarily due to the 2015 period
containing approximately $21,000 in hardware equipment written off
due to substantial doubt as to recoverability.
Cost of services
revenue decreased approximately $73,000 during the year ended
December 31, 2017 as compared to the corresponding period in 2016.
This decrease reflects lower professional service revenue of
approximately $52,000. Costs of service revenue can vary depending
upon the complexity of the project solution and the mix of labor
resources utilized to complete the service
element.
Cost of services revenue decreased 88% or approximately $861,000
during the year ended December 31, 2016 as compared to the
corresponding period in 2015. This decrease reflects higher
professional service revenue of approximately $322,000 due to the
positive impact of non-recurring revenue received from one customer
in the 2015 period combined with higher level and more costly
service resources utilized in the generation of such non-recurring
revenue during the year ended December 31, 2015 as compared to the
corresponding period in 2016. Also contributing to this decrease
was the write-off of $261,000 in capitalized labor costs due to
doubts as to the recoverability of such costs in the 2015 period.
Costs of service revenue can vary depending upon the complexity of
the project solution and the mix of labor resources utilized to
complete the service element.
Cost of Maintenance Revenue
Maintenance cost
of revenue
(dollars in thousands)
|
Year Ended
December
31,
2017
|
$
Change
|
%
Change
|
Year Ended
December
31,
2016
|
$
Change
|
%
Change
|
Year Ended
December
31,
2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
maintenance cost of revenue
|
$839
|
$12
|
1%
|
$827
|
$—
|
0%
|
$827
|
Percentage of total maintenance revenue
|
31%
|
|
|
32%
|
|
|
32%
|
Cost
of maintenance revenue increased approximately $12,000 during the
year ended December 31, 2017 as compared to the corresponding
period in 2016, resulting principally from higher labor costs
driven primarily by the utilization of more expensive labor
resources required to fulfill maintenance contract obligations for
the year ended December 31, 2017 as compared to the corresponding
period in 2016.
Product Gross Profit
Product gross profit
(dollars in thousands)
|
Years Ended
December 31,
2017
|
$
Change
|
%
Change
|
Years Ended
December 31,
2016
|
$
Change
|
%
Change
|
Years Ended
December 31,
2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Software
and royalties
|
$1,209
|
$430
|
55%
|
$779
|
$(733)
|
(48)%
|
$1,512
|
Percentage of software and royalty product revenue
|
97%
|
|
|
91%
|
|
|
94%
|
Hardware
and consumables
|
$30
|
$5
|
20%
|
$25
|
$36
|
327%
|
$(11)
|
Percentage of hardware and consumables product revenue
|
32%
|
|
|
37%
|
|
|
(32)%
|
Services
|
$223
|
$21
|
10%
|
$202
|
$628
|
147%
|
$(426)
|
Percentage of services product revenue
|
82%
|
|
|
61%
|
|
|
(77)%
|
Total
product gross profit
|
$1,462
|
$456
|
45%
|
$1,006
|
$(69)
|
(6)%
|
$1,075
|
Percentage of total product revenue
|
91%
|
|
|
81%
|
|
|
49%
|
Software and royalty gross profit increased 55% or
approximately $430,000 for the year ended December 31, 2017 as
compared to the corresponding period in 2016, due primarily to higher
software and royalty product revenue of approximately $391,000
combined with lower cost of software and royalty revenue of
approximately $39,000. This relationship is reflective of
approximately $339,000 in license revenue with extremely low costs.
In addition to changes in costs of software and royalty product
revenue caused by revenue level fluctuations, costs of products can
vary as a percentage of product revenue from period to period
depending upon level of software customization and third-party
software license content included in product sales during a given
period.
Software and royalty gross profit decreased 48% or
approximately $733,000 for the year ended December 31, 2016, as
compared to the corresponding period in 2015, due primarily to lower
software and royalty product revenue of approximately $744,000. In
addition to changes in costs of software and royalty product
revenue caused by revenue level fluctuations, costs of products can
vary as a percentage of product revenue from period to period
depending upon level of software customization and third-party
software license content included in product sales during a given
period.
Hardware and consumables gross profit increased
approximately $5,000 for the year ended December 31, 2017, as
compared to the 2016 period. This increase resulted
from higher sales of hardware and consumables in project solutions
of approximately $26,000
combined
with corresponding higher cost of hardware and consumables product
revenue of $21,000
for the
year ended December 31, 2017 as compared to the corresponding
period in 2016.
Hardware and consumables gross profit increased
approximately $36,000 for the year ended December 31, 2016, as
compared to the 2015 period. This increase resulted
from lower sales of hardware and consumables in project solutions
of approximately $34,000 combined with corresponding lower cost of
hardware and consumables product revenue of $2,000 for the year ended
December 31, 2016 as compared to the corresponding period in
2015.
Services gross profit increased approximately
$21,000 during the year ended December 31, 2017, as compared to the
corresponding period in 2016, due to lower service
revenue of approximately $52,000 combined with lower cost of
service revenue of approximately $73,000 for the year ended
December 31, 2017 as compared to the corresponding period in
2016. This inverse relationship is cause by the recognition
of certain service revenues in the twelve months ended December 31,
2017 combined with the related costs of these revenues being
written off in 2015 due to significant doubts as to the
recoverability of such costs in the 2015
period.
Services gross profit increased 147% or
approximately $628,000 during the year ended December 31, 2016, as
compared to the corresponding period in 2015, due to lower service
revenue of approximately $233,000 combined with lower cost of
service revenue of approximately $861,000 for the year ended
December 31, 2016 as compared to the corresponding period in
2015. The decrease in service revenue and
uncharacteristically high cost of service revenue in the 2015
period reflect the impact of non-recurring revenue received from
one customer in the 2015 period combined with significant costs
incurred from implementation challenges. The Company’s
contract with this one customer in the 2015 period also included
software product revenue of approximately $440,000,
offset by minimal costs. Also contributing to the services gross
profit increase was the write-off of $261,000 in capitalized
labor costs due to doubts as to the recoverability of such costs in
the 2015 period.
Maintenance Gross Profit
Maintenance gross profit
(dollars in thousands)
|
Year Ended
December
31,
2017
|
$
Change
|
%
Change
|
Year Ended
December
31,
2016
|
$
Change
|
%
Change
|
Year Ended
December
31,
2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
maintenance gross profit
|
$ 1,840
|
$104
|
6%
|
$1,736
|
$(14)
|
(1)%
|
$1,750
|
Percentage of total maintenance revenue
|
69%
|
|
|
68%
|
|
|
68%
|
Gross margins related
to maintenance revenue were 69% and 68% for the years ended
December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. The dollar increase of
approximately $104,000
for the
2017 year as compared to the corresponding 2016 period primarily
resulted from higher maintenance revenue of approximately $116,000
for the year ended December 31, 2017 as compared to the
corresponding period in 2016. Gross margins related to maintenance
revenue were 68% for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015,
respectively, for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015. The
decrease of approximately $14,000 for the 2016 year as compared to
the corresponding 2015 period primarily resulted from lower
maintenance revenue of approximately $14,000 for the year ended
December 31, 2016 as compared to the corresponding period in
2015.
Operating Expense
Operating Expense
(dollars in thousands)
|
Year Ended
December 31, 2017
|
$
Change
|
%
Change
|
Year Ended
December 31, 2016
|
$
Change
|
%
Change
|
Year Ended
December 31, 2015
|
General
and administrative
|
$4,192
|
$470
|
13%
|
$3,722
|
$285
|
8%
|
$3,437
|
Percentage of total net revenue
|
98%
|
|
|
98%
|
|
|
72%
|
Sales
and marketing
|
$2,816
|
$(205)
|
(7)%
|
$3,021
|
$230
|
8%
|
$2,791
|
Percentage of total net revenue
|
66%
|
|
|
79%
|
|
|
59%
|
Research
and development
|
$5,953
|
$621
|
12%
|
$5,332
|
$689
|
15%
|
$4,643
|
Percentage of total net revenue
|
139%
|
|
|
140%
|
|
|
97%
|
Depreciation
and amortization
|
$68
|
$(61)
|
(47)%
|
$129
|
$(35)
|
(22)%
|
$164
|
Percentage of total net revenue
|
2%
|
|
|
3%
|
|
|
3%
|
General and Administrative Expense
General
and administrative expense is comprised primarily of salaries and
other employee-related costs for executive, financial, and other
infrastructure personnel. General legal, accounting and consulting
services, insurance, occupancy and communication costs are also
included with general and administrative expense.
The
dollar increase of approximately $470,000 in general and
administrative expense for the year ended December 31, 2017, as
compared to the corresponding period in 2016, is comprised of the
following major components:
●
Increase in personnel related expense of approximately $170,000 due
to head count increases;
●
Increase
in financing related expenses of approximately
$160,000;
●
Increase
in professional fees including consulting services and contract
services of approximately $27,000 due primarily to
decreases in audit fees of $75,000 offset by increases in legal
fees of approximately $6,000, increases in various consulting,
contract services and corporate expenses of approximately $82,000
and increases in patent related fees of approximately
$14,000;
●
Decrease in stock-based compensation expense of approximately
$59,000; and
●
Increase in travel, insurances, licenses, dues, rent, and office
related costs of approximately $172,000.
The
dollar increase of approximately $285,000 in general and
administrative expense for the year ended December 31, 2016, as
compared to the corresponding period in 2015, is comprised of the
following major components:
●
Increase in personnel related expense of approximately $331,000 due
to head count increases;
●
Decrease in professional fees including
consulting services and contract services of approximately
$101,000 due
primarily to decreases in patent related expenses of approximately
$134,000, decreases in legal fees of approximately $14,000,
decreases in various consulting, contract services and corporate
expenses of approximately $34,000, offset by increases in
public/inventory relation fees of approximately $35,000 and
auditing fees of approximately $46,000;
●
Increase in stock-based compensation expense of approximately
$96,000; and
●
Decrease in travel, insurances, licenses, dues, rent, and office
related costs of approximately $41,000.
We
continue to focus our efforts on achieving additional future
operating efficiencies by reviewing and improving upon existing
business processes and evaluating our cost structure. We believe
these efforts will allow us to continue to gradually decrease our
level of general and administrative expense expressed as a
percentage of total revenue.
Sales and Marketing Expense
Sales and marketing expense consists primarily of the salaries,
commissions, other incentive compensation, employee benefits and
travel expense of our sales, marketing, and business
development.
The dollar decrease in
sales and marketing expense of approximately
$205,000 during the year ended
December 31, 2017, as compared to the corresponding period in 2016,
is primarily comprised of the following major
components:
●
Decrease in personnel related expense of
approximately $45,000 due
primarily to decreases in headcount;
●
Decrease in professional services of approximately $194,000
resulting primarily from decreased utilization of sales
consultants;
●
Increase in contract services and office related expense of
approximately $18,000;
●
Decrease in our Mexico sales office related expense of
approximately $39,000 due primarily to lower contractor utilization
for the year ended December 31, 2017 as compared to the comparable
period in 2016 due to the completion of certain identity management
projects;
●
Increase in travel and trade show expense of approximately $33,000
and increases in advertising due and subscriptions and other
selling expense of approximately $26,000; and
●
Decrease in stock-based compensation of approximately
$4,000.
We
anticipate that the level of expense incurred for sales and
marketing during the year ended December 31, 2018 will increase as
we pursue large project solution opportunities.
The dollar increase in
sales and marketing expense of approximately
$230,000 during the year ended
December 31, 2016, as compared to the corresponding period in 2015,
is primarily comprised of the following major
components:
●
Increase in personnel related expense of
approximately $49,000 due
primarily to increases in headcount;
●
Increase in professional services of approximately $195,000
resulting primarily from increased utilization of sales
consultants;
●
Increase in contract services and office related expense of
approximately $50,000;
●
Decrease in our Mexico sales office related expense of
approximately $65,000 due primarily to lower contractor utilization
for the year ended December 31, 2016 as compared to the comparable
period in 2015 due to the completion of certain identity management
projects;
●
Decrease in travel and trade show expense and other selling expense
of approximately $52,000; and
●
Increase in stock-based compensation of approximately
$53,000.
We
anticipate that the level of expense incurred for sales and
marketing during the year ended December 31, 2017 will increase as
we pursue large project solution opportunities.
Research and Development Expense
Research and development expense consists primarily of salaries,
employee benefits and outside contractors for new product
development, product enhancements, custom integration work and
related facility costs.
Research and
development expense increased approximately
$621,000 for the year ended
December 31, 2017, as compared to the corresponding period in 2016,
due primarily to the following major
components:
●
Decrease
in personnel expenditures of approximately $72,000
due to
the full year effect of several headcount changes combined with
higher levels of capitalized labor for the year ended December 31,
2017 as compared to the comparable period in
2016;
●
Increase in contractor fees and contract services of approximately
$570,000;
●
Decrease in stock-based compensation of
approximately $4,000;
and
●
Increase in office related expense including communications,
engineering tools and supplies, dues and subscriptions and travel
of approximately $127,000.
Research and
development expense increased approximately
$689,000 for the year ended
December 31, 2016, as compared to the corresponding period in 2015,
due primarily to the following major
components:
●
Increase
in personnel expenditures of approximately $702,000
due to
the full year effect of several headcount increases in mid-2015
combined with lower levels of capitalized labor for the year ended
December 31, 2016 as compared to the comparable period in 2015 due
to the completion of certain identity management
projects;
●
Increase in contractor fees and contract services of approximately
$51,000;
●
Increase in stock-based compensation of
approximately $48,000;
and
●
Decrease in office related expense and travel of approximately
$112,000.
Our level of expenditures in research and development reflects our
belief that to maintain our competitive position in markets
characterized by rapid rates of technological advancement, we must
continue to invest significant resources in new systems and
software as well as continue to enhance existing
products.
Depreciation and Amortization
During
the year ended December 31, 2017, depreciation and amortization
expense decreased approximately $61,000 as compared to the
corresponding period in 2016. During the year ended December 31,
2016, depreciation and amortization expense decreased approximately
$35,000 as compared to the corresponding period in 2015. The
relatively small amount of depreciation and amortization in both
periods reflects the relatively small property and equipment
carrying value.
Interest Expense (Income), Net
For
the year ended December 31, 2017, we recognized interest income of
$43,000 and interest expense of $634,000. For the year ended
December 31, 2016, we recognized interest income of $3,000 and
interest expense of $248,000. For the year ended December 31, 2015,
we recognized interest income of $7,000 and interest expense of
$454,000.
Interest
expense for the year ended December 31, 2017 contains the following
components:
●
Approximately $11,000 of amortization expense of deferred financing
fees related to the Lines of Credit;
●
Approximately $198,000 of amortization expense of recognized
beneficial conversion feature related to the Lines of Credit
borrowings; and
●
Approximately $425,000 related to coupon interest on our 8% Line of
Credit borrowings.
Interest
expense for the year ended December 31, 2016 contains the following
components:
●
Approximately $48,000 of amortization expense of deferred financing
fees related to the Lines of Credit;
●
Approximately $97,000 of amortization expense of recognized
beneficial conversion feature related to the Lines of Credit
borrowings; and
●
Approximately $102,000 related to coupon interest on our 8% Line of
Credit borrowings.
Interest
expense for the year ended December 31, 2015 contains the following
components:
●
Approximately $53,000 of amortization expense of deferred financing
fees related to the Lines of Credit;
●
Approximately $385,000 of amortization expense of recognized
beneficial conversion feature related to the Lines of Credit
borrowings;
●
Approximately $12,000 related to coupon interest on our 8% Line of
Credit borrowings; and
●
Approximately $4,000 related to miscellaneous interest
charges.
Other Income
For the year ended
December 31, 2017, we recognized other income of approximately
$125,000 and other expense of
$0. Other income for the year ended December 31, 2017 is
comprised of approximately $75,000 from the write off of
certain accrued expenses due the expiration of the legal statute of
limitations on such liabilities. Other income also includes $50,000
from the sale of one of the Company’s non-utilized
trademarks.
For the year ended
December 31, 2016, we recognized other income of approximately
$201,000 and other expense of
$0. Other income for the year ended December 31, 2016 is
comprised of approximately $201,000 from the write off of certain
accrued expenses due the expiration of the legal statute of
limitations on such liabilities.
For the year ended
December 31, 2015, we recognized other income of approximately
$145,000 and other expense of
$0. Other income for the year ended December 31, 2015 is
comprised of approximately $46,000 relating to the litigation
settlement of certain patent infringement matters in favor of the
Company and approximately $99,000 from the recovery of a previously
written-off accounts receivable.
Income Tax Expense
During
the year ended December 31, 2017, we recorded a net benefit of
approximately $124,000 from income taxes, as compared to an expense
of $21,000 for the year ended December 31, 2016, and expense of
$22,000 for the year ended December 31, 2015.
During
the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, our benefit for income
taxes of $124,000 and tax expense of $21,000, respectively. The tax
benefit reflects the reversal of a prior year accrual related to
foreign taxes which expired due to the expiration of the statute of
limitation on this foreign tax liability. The 2016 tax expense
relates to taxes on income generated in certain foreign
jurisdictions offset by research and development tax credits
generated in certain foreign jurisdictions.
We
have incurred consolidated pre-tax losses during the years ended
December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, and have incurred operating
losses in all prior periods. Management has determined that it is
more likely than not that a tax benefit from such losses will not
be realized. Accordingly, we did not record a benefit for income
taxes for these periods.
Liquidity, Capital Resources and Going Concern
Historically, our
principal sources of cash have included customer payments from the
sale of our products, proceeds from the issuance of common and
preferred stock and proceeds from the issuance of debt, including
our Lines of Credit (defined below). Our principal uses of cash
have included cash used in operations, product development and
payments relating to purchases of property and equipment. We expect
that our principal uses of cash in the future will be for product
development including customization of identity management products
for enterprise and consumer applications, further development of
intellectual property, development of SaaS capabilities for
existing products as well as general working capital and capital
expenditure requirements. We expect that, as our revenues grow, our
sales and marketing and research and development expenses will
continue to grow, albeit at a slower rate and, as a result, we will
need to generate significant net revenues to achieve and sustain
income from operations.
Reliance on Lines of Credit
In March 2013, the Company and Neal Goldman, a
member of the Company’s Board of Directors
(“Goldman”), entered into a line of credit (the
“Goldman Line of
Credit”), as amended,
with available borrowings of up to $5.5 million, and a maturity
date, as amended, of December 31, 2018. Pursuant to the terms and conditions of the
Goldman Line of Credit, as amended, Goldman has the right to
convert the outstanding principal amount due under the terms of the
Goldman Line of Credit, plus any accrued but unpaid interest due
thereunder, into shares of the Company’s Common Stock for
$1.25 per share.
As consideration for the Goldman Line of Credit,
as amended, Goldman was granted warrants to purchase an aggregate
of 1,230,410 shares of the Company’s Common Stock (the
“Line
of Credit Warrants”). The
Goldman Line of Credit Warrants have exercise prices ranging
between $0.95 and $2.25 per share and 177,778 of these warrants
expired unexercised.
The
Company estimated the fair value of the Line of Credit Warrants
using the Black-Scholes option pricing model using the following
assumptions: term of two years, a risk-free interest rate of 2.58%,
a dividend yield of 0%, and volatility between 74% and 79%. The
Company recorded the fair value of the Line of Credit Warrants as a
deferred financing fee of approximately $580,000 to be amortized
over the life of the Goldman Line of Credit.
During
the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company recorded an
aggregate of approximately $11,000 and $48,000, respectively in
deferred financing fee amortization expense which is recorded as a
component of interest expense in the Company’s consolidated
statements of operations.
The Company
has also entered into an unsecured line of credit with Charles
Crocker, a member of the Company’s Board of Directors
(“Crocker”), which, as amended, provides for
available borrowings of up to $500,000 (the
“Crocker LOC”). All amounts due under the terms of
the Crocker LOC, as amended, are convertible into shares of the
Company’s Common Stock for $1.25 per
share.
As the amendments to the Goldman Line of Credit and the Crocker LOC
("Lines of Credit")
resulted in an increase to the borrowing capacity of the Lines of
Credit, the Company adjusted the amortization period of any
remaining unamortized deferred costs and note discounts to the term
of the new arrangement.
The
Company evaluated the Lines of Credit and determined that the
instruments contain a contingent beneficial conversion feature,
i.e. an embedded conversion right that enables the holder to obtain
the underlying Common Stock at a price below market value. The
beneficial conversion feature is contingent as the terms of the
conversion do not permit the Company to compute the number of
shares that the holder would receive if the contingent event occurs
(i.e. future borrowings under the Lines of Credit). The Company has
considered the accounting for this contingent beneficial conversion
feature using the guidance in ASC 470, Debt. The guidance in ASC
470 states that a contingent beneficial conversion feature in an
instrument shall not be recognized in earnings until the
contingency is resolved. The beneficial conversion features of
future borrowings under the Lines of Credit will be measured
using the intrinsic value calculated at the date the contingency is
resolved using the conversion price and trading value of the
Company’s Common Stock at the date the Lines of Credit were
issued (commitment date). Pursuant to borrowings made during the
2015 year, the Company recognized approximately $146,000 in
beneficial conversion feature as debt discount. As a result of the
retirement of all amounts outstanding under the Lines of Credit in
2015, the Company recognized all remaining unamortized debt
discount of approximately $385,000 as a component of interest
expense during the three months ended March 31, 2015. As a result
of $2,650,000 in borrowings under the Lines of Credit during the
year ended December 31, 2016, the Company recorded approximately
$219,000 in debt discount attributable to the beneficial conversion
feature during the year ended December 31, 2016. As a result of
additional borrowings of $3,350,000 under the Lines of Credit
during the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company recorded
approximately $302,000 in debt discount attributable to the
beneficial conversion feature during the year ended December 31,
2017. During the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, the
Company accreted approximately $198,000 and $97,000, respectively,
of debt discount as a component of interest expense.
The
following table sets forth the Company’s activity under its
Lines of Credit for the periods indicated:
Balance
outstanding under Lines of Credit as of December 31,
2015
|
$—
|
Borrowing
under Lines of Credit
|
2,650
|
Repayments
|
—
|
Balance
outstanding under Lines of Credit as of December 31,
2016
|
$2,650
|
Borrowings
under Lines of Credit
|
3,350
|
Repayments
|
—
|
Balance
outstanding under Lines of Credit as of December 31,
2017
|
$6,000
|
-44-
Table of Contents
We
currently do not anticipate generating sufficient revenue and
profit to repay these borrowings in full when due. Therefore,
unless the holders of the Lines of Credit convert any outstanding
balance into shares of Common Stock, we will need to seek an
extension of the maturity date of the Lines of Credit on or before
December 31, 2018. If we are unable to extend the maturity date of
the Lines of Credit, we will be required to raise additional
capital through debt and/or equity financing to continue
operations. No assurances can be given that any such financing will
be available to us on favorable terms, if at all. At this time, we
do not have any commitments for alternative financing or for an
extension of the maturity date of the Lines of Credit.
Going Concern and Management's Plan
At
December 31, 2017, we had a working capital deficit of
approximately $415,000, compared to a working capital deficit of
approximately $3.0 million at December 31, 2016. Our principal
sources of liquidity at December 31, 2017 consisted of cash and
cash equivalents of $7,317,000, compared to available borrowings
under our Lines of Credit of $3,350,000, and approximately
$1,586,000 of cash and cash equivalents at December 31,
2016.
Considering
our projected cash requirements, and assuming we are unable to
generate incremental revenue, our available cash may be
insufficient to satisfy our cash requirements for the next twelve
months from the date of this filing. These factors raise
substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.
To address our working capital requirements, management may seek
additional equity and/or debt financing through the issuance of
additional debt and/or equity securities or may seek strategic or
other transactions intended to increase shareholder value. There
are currently no formal committed financing arrangements to support
our projected cash shortfall, including commitments to purchase
additional debt and/or equity securities, or other agreements, and
no assurances can be given that we will be successful in raising
additional debt and/or equity securities, or entering into any
other transaction that addresses our ability to continue as a going
concern.
In
view of the matters described in the preceding paragraph,
recoverability of a major portion of the recorded asset amounts
shown in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet is dependent
upon continued operations of the Company, which, in turn, is
dependent upon the Company’s ability to continue to raise
capital and generate positive cash flows from operations. However,
the Company operates in markets that are emerging and highly
competitive. There is no assurance that the Company will be able to
obtain additional capital, operate at a profit or generate positive
cash flows in the future.
The
consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments
relating to the recoverability and classification of recorded asset
amounts and classifications of liabilities that might be necessary
should the Company be unable to continue as a going
concern.
Operating Activities
Net
cash used in operating activities was $8,703,000 during the year
ended December 31, 2017 as compared to $7,911,000 during the year
ended December 31, 2016 and $7,183,000 during the year ended
December 31, 2015. During the year ended December 31,
2017, net cash used in operating activities consisted of net loss
of $10,069,000 and an increase in operating cash from changes in
assets and liabilities of $195,000. We also incurred $1,171,000 in
net non-cash costs including $1,151,000 in stock based
compensation, $209,000 in debt issuance cost amortization and debt
discount amortization, $15,000 in provision for losses on accounts
receivable and $68,000 in depreciation and amortization offset by
$272,000 of non-cash income primarily from the write-off of certain
accrued expenses due to the expiration of the statute of
limitations of $222,000 and $50,000 from the sale of one of the
Company’s non-utilized trademarks. During the year ended
December 31, 2017, we used cash of $282,000 from increases in
current assets and generated cash of $477,000 through increases in
current liabilities and deferred revenues, excluding
debt.
During
the year ended December 31, 2016, net cash used in operating
activities consisted of net loss of $9,527,000 and an increase in
operating cash from changes in assets and liabilities of $383,000.
We also incurred $1,235,000 in net non-cash costs including
$1,162,000 in stock-based compensation, $145,000 in debt issuance
cost amortization and debt discount amortization, and $129,000 in
depreciation and amortization offset by $200,000 of non-cash income
primarily from the write-off of certain accrued expenses due to the
expiration of the statute of limitations. During the year ended
December 31, 2016, we generated cash of $35,000
from reductions in current assets and generated cash of
$348,000 through increases in current liabilities and deferred
revenues, excluding debt.
During
the year ended December 31, 2015, net cash used in operating
activities consisted of net loss of $8,534,000 and a decrease in
operating cash from changes in assets and liabilities of $572,000.
We also incurred $1,923,000 in net non-cash costs including
$1,040,000 in stock-based compensation (which includes $80,000 in
warrants modified in lieu of cash as compensation), $438,000
in debt issuance cost amortization and debt discount amortization,
$281,000 related to the write down of capitalized labor inventory
to net realizable value, and $164,000 in depreciation and
amortization. During the year ended December 31, 2015, we generated
cash of $523,000 from reductions in current assets and used
cash of $1,095,000 through reductions in current liabilities and
deferred revenues, excluding debt.
Investing Activities
Net cash provided by
investing activities was $45,000 for the year ended
December 31, 2017, $49,000 for the year ended December 31, 2016 and
$87,000 for the year ended December 31, 2015. For the years ended
December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, we used cash to fund capital expenditures of
computer equipment, software and furniture and fixtures of $5,000,
$49,000 and $87,000, respectively. This level of equipment
purchases resulted primarily from the replacement of older
equipment. For the year ended December 31, 2017, we generated cash
of $50,000 from the sale of one of our non-utilized
trademarks.
Financing Activities
We generated cash of $14,495,000 from financing
activities for the year ended December 31, 2017, as compared to
$6,195,000 for
the year ended December 31, 2016 and $10,337,000 for the year ended
December 31, 2015. During the year ended December 31, 2017, we
generated cash of $11,000,000 from the Series A Financing offset by
$63,000 in offering costs, generated $3,350,000 from borrowings
under the Lines of Credit and generated approximately $259,000 from
the exercise of 369,004 options resulting in the issuance of
369,004 shares of Common Stock. We used cash of approximately
$51,000 for the payment of dividends on our Series B Convertible
Preferred Stock.
During
the year ended December 31, 2016, we generated cash of $2,000,000
from the Series F Financing offset by $21,000 in offering costs,
and $1,625,000 from the Series G Financing, offset by $11,000 in
offering costs, $3,000 from the exercise of 12,626 Common Stock
options and $2,650,000 from borrowings under the Lines of Credit.
We used cash of $51,000 for the payment of dividends on our Series
B Preferred. During the year ended December 31, 2015, we
generated cash of $10,022,000 from the Series E Financing offset by
$67,000 in offering costs, $33,000 from the exercise of 39,705
Common Stock options and $750,000 from borrowings under the Goldman
Line of Credit offset by the repayment of $350,000 under the
Goldman Line of Credit. We used cash of $51,000 for the payment of
dividends on our Series B Preferred.
Debt
At
December 31, 2017, we had approximately $5,774,000 in outstanding
debt, net of unamortized debt discount of approximately $226,000
and in addition we owed approximately $527,000 in related accrued
interest.
Contractual Obligations
Total
contractual obligations and commercial commitments as of December
31, 2017 are summarized in the following table (in
thousands):
|
Payment Due by Year
|
||||
|
Total
|
Less than 1 Year
|
1-3 Years
|
3-5 Years
|
More than 5 Years
|
Operating
lease obligations
|
$1,770
|
$607
|
$847
|
$316
|
$—
|
Advances
(including accrued interest of approximately $527,000) under
related party lines of credit
|
$6,527
|
6,527
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
Total
|
$8,297
|
$7,134
|
$847
|
$316
|
$—
|
Real Property Leases
Our
corporate headquarters are located in San Diego, California where
we occupy 9,927 square feet of office space. This facility is
leased through October 2018 at a cost of approximately $30,000 per
month. In addition to our corporate headquarters, we also occupied
and leased the following spaces at December 31, 2017:
●
1,508 square feet in Ottawa, Province of Ontario, Canada, at a cost
of approximately $3,000 per month until the expiration of the lease
on March 31, 2021. This lease was renewed in April 2016 for a
five-year period ending on March 31, 2021. Renewal terms were
substantially unchanged from the existing lease;
●
9,720 square feet in Portland, Oregon, at a cost of approximately
$21,000 per month until the expiration of the lease on December 31,
2021. This lease was renewed in September 2017, resulting in an
additional 1,675 feet, an increase from approximately $18,000 to
approximately $21,000 per month and the extension of the term from
October 2018 to December 2021; and
●
304
square feet of office space in Mexico City, Mexico, at a cost of
approximately $3,000 per month until
November 30, 2018.
Stock-based Compensation
Stock-based
compensation related to equity options and restricted stock has
been classified as follows in the accompanying consolidated
statements of operations (in thousands):
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
||
|
2017
|
2016
|
2015
|
Cost
of revenue
|
$19
|
$20
|
$15
|
General
and administrative
|
655
|
714
|
618
|
Sales
and marketing
|
220
|
224
|
171
|
Research
and development
|
200
|
204
|
156
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
$1,094
|
$1,162
|
$960
|
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
At
December 31, 2017, we did not have any relationships with
unconsolidated entities or financial partnerships, such as entities
often referred to as structured finance, special purpose or
variable interest entities, which would have been established for
the purpose of facilitating off-balance sheet arrangements or other
contractually narrow or limited purposes. In addition, we did not
engage in trading activities involving non-exchange traded
contracts. As a result, we are not exposed to any financing,
liquidity, market or credit risk that could arise if we had engaged
in such relationships. We do not have relationships and
transactions with persons or entities that derive benefits from
their non-independent relationship with us or our related parties
except as disclosed elsewhere in this Annual Report.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
From time to time, new accounting pronouncements
are issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the
“FASB”), or other standard setting bodies, which
are adopted by us as of the specified effective date. Unless
otherwise discussed, the Company’s management believes the
impact of recently issued standards not yet effective will not have
a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial
statements upon adoption. See Note 2 to these consolidated
financial statements for a detailed discussion of recently issued
accounting pronouncements.
Impact of Inflation
The
primary inflationary factor affecting our operations is labor
costs, and we do not believe that inflation has materially affected
earnings during the past four years. Substantial increases in costs
and expenses, particularly labor and operating expenses, could have
a significant impact on our operating results to the extent that
such increases cannot be passed along to customers and end
users.
Our
business extends to countries outside the United States, and we
intend to continue to expand our foreign operations. As a
result, our revenues and results of operations are affected by
fluctuations in currency exchange rates, interest rates, and other
uncertainties inherent in doing business in more than one
currency. In addition, our operations are exposed to risks
that are associated with changes in social, political, and economic
conditions in the foreign countries in which we operate, including
changes in the laws and policies that govern foreign investment, as
well as, to a lesser extent, changes in United States laws and
regulations relating to foreign trade and investment.
We
had approximately $76,000 and $80,000 in revenue from sources
outside the United States for the years ended December 31, 2017 and
2016, respectively. We made payments in foreign currencies to
fund our foreign operations of approximately $889,000 and $958,000
for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.
Changes in currency exchange rates affect the relative prices at
which we sell our products and purchase goods and
services. Given the uncertainty of exchange rate fluctuations,
we cannot estimate the effect of these fluctuations on our future
business, product pricing, results of operations, or financial
condition. We do not use foreign currency exchange contracts
or derivative financial instruments for hedging or speculative
purposes. To the extent foreign sales become a more
significant part of our business in the future, we may seek to
implement strategies which make use of these or other instruments
in order to minimize the effects of foreign currency exchange on
our business.
ITEM 8.
|
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
|
Our
consolidated financial statements as of and for the years ended
December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 and the report of our independent
registered public accounting firm are included in Item 15 of this
Annual Report.
ITEM 9.
|
CHANGES IN AND
DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL
DISCLOSURE
|
None.
ITEM 9A.
|
CONTROLS AND
PROCEDURES
|
(a) Evaluation of Disclosure
Controls and Procedures
Under the supervision and with the participation
of our Management, including our principal executive officer and
principal financial officer, we conducted an evaluation of the
effectiveness of the design and operations of our disclosure
controls and procedures, as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
(the “Exchange
Act”), as of December 31,
2017. Based on this evaluation, the Company’s Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure
controls and procedures were effective to ensure that information
required to be disclosed in the reports submitted under the
Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within
the time periods specified in SEC rules and forms. In
making this assessment, we used the criteria set forth by the
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission
(2013 framework) in Internal Control—Integrated
Framework.
(b) Management’s Annual
Report on Internal Control over Financial
Reporting.
Our
management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate
internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule
13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act). Our internal control over
financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable
assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes of
accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States.
Because
of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial
reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Therefore, even
those systems determined to be effective can provide only
reasonable assurance of achieving their control
objectives.
Our
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer evaluated the
effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as
of December 31, 2017. In making this assessment, we used the
criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of
the Treadway Commission (2013 framework) in Internal
Control—Integrated Framework. Based on this evaluation, our
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that,
as of December 31, 2017, our internal control over financial
reporting was effective.
Mayer
Hoffman McCann P.C., our independent registered public
accounting firm that audited our consolidated financial statements
included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, has issued an
attestation report on the effectiveness of our internal control
over financial reporting, which report is included in Part IV
below.
(c) Changes
in Internal Controls over Financial Reporting.
The
Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
have determined that there have been no changes, in the
Company’s internal control over financial reporting during
the period covered by this report identified in connection with the
evaluation described in the above paragraph that have materially
affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect,
Company’s internal control over financial
reporting.
ITEM 9B.
|
OTHER INFORMATION
|
Not
applicable.
PART III
ITEM 10.
|
DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
|
The
Board of Directors and executive officers consist of the persons
named in the table below. Each director serves for a one-year term,
until his or her successor is elected and qualified, or until
earlier resignation or removal. Our bylaws provide that the
number of directors shall not be less than four, but no more than
ten. The directors and executive officers are as
follows:
Name
|
|
Age
|
|
Principal Occupation/Position Held With the Company
|
Mr. S. James Miller, Jr.
|
|
64
|
|
Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of
Directors
|
Mr. Wayne Wetherell
|
|
65
|
|
Senior Vice President of Administration, Chief Financial Officer,
Secretary and Treasurer
|
Mr. David Harding
|
|
48
|
|
Senior Vice President, Chief Technical Officer
|
Mr. Robert Brown
|
|
56
|
|
Vice President, Sales and Business Development
|
Mr. David Somerville
|
|
57
|
|
Senior Vice President, Sales and Marketing
|
Mr. David Carey
|
|
73
|
|
Director
|
Mr. Guy Steve Hamm
|
|
70
|
|
Director
|
Mr. David Loesch
|
|
73
|
|
Director
|
Mr. John Cronin
|
|
63
|
|
Director
|
Mr. Neal Goldman
|
|
73
|
|
Director
|
Mr. Charles Crocker
|
|
79
|
|
Director
|
Mr. Dana W. Kammersgard
|
|
62
|
|
Director
|
Mr. Charles Frischer
|
|
51
|
|
Director
|
Mr. Robert T. Clutterbuck
|
|
67
|
|
Director
|
S. James
Miller, Jr. has
served as our Chief Executive Officer since 1990 and Chairman of
the Board since 1996. He also served as our President from 1990
until 2003. From 1980 to 1990, Mr. Miller was an executive
with Oak Industries, Inc., a manufacturer of components for
the telecommunications industry. While at Oak Industries,
Mr. Miller served as a director and as Senior Vice President,
General Counsel, Corporate Secretary and Chairman/President of Oak
Industries’ Pacific Rim subsidiaries. He has a J.D. from the
University of San Diego School of Law and a B.A. from the
University of California, San Diego.
The
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee believes that Mr.
Miller possesses substantial managerial expertise leading the
Company through its various stages of development and growth,
beginning in 1990 when Mr. Miller joined the Company as President
and Chief Executive Officer, and that such expertise is extremely
valuable to the Board of Directors and the Company as it executes
its business plan. In addition, the Board of Directors values the
input provided by Mr. Miller given his legal
experience.
Wayne
Wetherell has served as
our Senior Vice President, Administration and Chief Financial
Officer since May 2001 and additionally as our Secretary and
Treasurer since October 2005. From 1996 to May 2001, he
served as Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer.
From 1991 to 1996, Mr. Wetherell was the Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer of Bilstein Corporation of America, a
manufacturer and distributor of automotive parts. From 1980 to 1990
Mr. Wetherell served in various financial roles culminating as
Director of Financial Planning and Analysis for Oak Industries,
Inc., a manufacturer of components for the telecommunications
industry traded on the NYSE. Mr. Wetherell holds a B.S.
degree in Management and a M.S. degree in Finance from San Diego
State University.
David Harding. Mr. Harding has
served as our Sr. Vice President and Chief Technology Officer since
January 2006. Mr. Harding has more than 25 years of technology
implementation and management experience, is responsible for
strategic design, technology infrastructure and core strategy from
concept through delivery. Before joining us, Mr. Harding was
the Chief Technology Officer at IC Solutions, Inc., where he
was responsible for all technology departments including the
development and management of software development, IT and quality
assurance, as well as their respective hardware, software and human
resource budgets from 2001 to 2003. He was the Chief Technology
Officer at Thirsty.com from 1999 to 2000, the Chief Technology
Officer at Fulcrum Point Technologies, Inc., from 1996 to
1999, and consultant to Access360, which is now part of IBM/Tivoli,
from 1995 to 1996.
Robert
Brown. Mr. Brown has
served as our Vice President – Sales and Business Development
since June 2015. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Brown served
since February 2010 as the principal of Black Diamond Group, a
global consultancy agency representing new technology companies in
connection with their relationship with Microsoft. Prior to
Black Diamond Group, Mr. Brown served as the Director of Business
Development of Ascend Communications. Mr. Brown is a graduate
of Eastern Washington University with a B.S. in Computer
Technology.
David
Somerville has served as our
Senior Vice President of Sales and Marketing since January 2018.
Mr. Somerville has spent over 20 years working in executive,
consulting, and advisory board positions for public and private
companies, supporting the world’s major service providers,
enterprises, and government agencies. Mr. Somerville leads our
Sales and Marketing efforts and is responsible for bringing our
industry leading, patented biometric platforms to mobile and
desktop users around the globe via strategic partnerships and
direct sales. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Somerville held
senior executive sales and business development positions at
leading companies in the cybersecurity industry, including Norse
Networks Inc. from January 2017 to January 2018, Fortscale Inc.
from March 2016 to January 2017, Norse Corporation Inc. from
September 2014 to February 2016, Cloudmark Inc. (now Proofpoint
Inc.) from 2005 to March 2014, and Network Equipment Technologies,
where he has consistently achieved global market leadership
positions in the service provider, enterprise, and government
markets. From April 2014 to September 2014, he served as the
Principal at David Somerville Consulting. Mr. Somerville holds a
Bachelor of Science degree in communications and electronic
engineering with a minor in business studies from Edinburgh Napier
University, Scotland.
David
Carey was appointed to the
Board in February 2006. Mr. Carey is a former Executive
Director of the Central Intelligence Agency. Mr. Carey briefly
served on the Board of Cyberby, Inc., a public company, resigning
in October 2015 and currently is the Chairman of Proxy Boards for
Leonard DRS Technologies and OnPoint Consulting. In addition, heis
a member of the Proxy Board for Informatica Federal Operations,
Inc. as well as the Board of Trimpan, Inc. Mr. Carey also
serves on a number of Advisory Boards. In addition, Mr. Carey
consults with companies both independently and as an affiliate of
the Command Consulting Group. From April 2005 to August
of 2008, Mr. Carey served as Executive Director for Blackbird
Technologies, which provides state-of-the-art IT security
expertise, where he assisted the company with business development
and strategic planning. Prior to joining Blackbird Technologies,
Mr. Carey was Vice President, Information Assurance for Oracle
Corporation from September 2001 to April 2005. In
addition, Mr. Carey worked for the CIA for 32 years until
2001. During his career at the CIA, Mr. Carey held several
senior positions including that of Executive Director, often
referred to as the Chief Operating Officer, or No. 3 person in
the agency, from 1997 to 2001. Before assuming that position,
Mr. Carey was Director of the DCI Crime and Narcotics Center,
the Director of the Office of Near Eastern and South Asian
Analysis, and Deputy Director of the Office of Global Issues.
Mr. Carey is a graduate of Cornell University and the
University of Delaware.
The
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee believes that Mr.
Carey’s experience as a former Executive Director of the CIA,
his experience dealing with IT security matters, and the extensive
contacts gained over his career working within the intelligence and
security community, provide the Board with specialized expertise
that assists the Company in the specific industries in which it
operates.
Guy Steve
Hamm was appointed to the
Board in October 2004. Mr. Hamm served as CFO of Aspen
Holding, a privately held insurance provider, from
December 2005 to February 2007. In 2003, Mr. Hamm retired
from PricewaterhouseCoopers, where he was a national
partner-in-charge of middle market. Mr. Hamm was instrumental
in growing the Audit Business Advisory Services
(“ABAS”) Middle Market practice at
PricewaterhouseCoopers, where he was responsible for $300 million
in revenue and more than 100 partners. Mr. Hamm is a
graduate of San Diego State University.
The
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee believes that Mr.
Hamm’s experience in public accounting, together with his
management experience as a Chief Financial Officer, provide the
Audit Committee of the Board with the expertise needed to oversee
the Company’s finance and accounting professionals, and the
Company’s independent public accountants.
David
Loesch was appointed to
the Board in September 2001 after 29 years of service as
a Special Agent with the Federal Bureau of Investigations
(“FBI”). At the time of his retirement from the
FBI, Mr. Loesch was the Assistant Director in Charge of the
Criminal Justice Information Services Division of the FBI.
Mr. Loesch was awarded the Presidential Rank Award for
Meritorious Executive in 1998 and has served on the board of
directors of the Special Agents Mutual Benefit Association since
1996. He is also a member of the International Association of
Chiefs of Police and the Society of Former Special Agents of the
FBI, Inc. In 1999, Mr. Loesch was appointed by former
Attorney General Janet Reno to serve as one of 15 original members
of the Compact Council, an organization charged with promulgating
rules and procedures governing the use and exchange of criminal
history records for non-criminal justice use. Mr. Loesch
served in the United States Army as an Officer with the 101st
Airborne Division in Vietnam. He holds a Bachelor’s degree
from Canisius College and a Master’s degree in Criminal
Justice from George Washington University. Mr. Loesch continues to
work as a private consultant on criminal justice information
sharing and the use of biometrics to help identify criminals and
individuals of special concern.
The
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee believes that Mr.
Loesch’s extensive service as a Special Agent with the FBI,
together with his knowledge of security issues relevant to the
Company’s products and markets, provides the Company and the
Board of Directors with relevant input regarding the industries in
which the Company competes, and the markets served by the
Company.
John
Cronin was appointed to
the Board in February 2012. Mr. Cronin is currently Managing
Director and Chairman of ipCapital Group, Inc.
(“ipCG”), an intellectual property consulting firm
Mr. Cronin founded in 1998. During his time with ipCG, Mr.
Cronin created both a unique ipCapital System(R) Methodology for
consulting, as well as a world-class licensing and transaction
process, and worked with over 700 companies, including more than
10% of the Fortune 500. Prior to forming ipCG, Mr. Cronin spent
over 17 years at IBM and became its top inventor with over 100
patents and 150 patent publications. He created and ran the IBM
Patent Factory, which was essential in helping IBM become number
one in US patents, and the team that contributed to the startup and
success of IBM’s licensing program. Additionally, Mr. Cronin
serves as a member of the Board of Directors at Vermont Electric
Power Company (“VELCO”), Armor Designs, Inc., Document Security
Systems, and Primal Fusion, Inc., and GraphOn and as a member of
the advisory board for innoPad, Inc. He holds a B.S. and a M.S.in
electrical engineering, and a B.A. degree in Psychology from the
University of Vermont.
The
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee believes that Mr.
Cronin’s experience developing and extracting the value from
intellectual property, and his experience serving on, and advising,
boards of directors, will contribute to deliberations of our Board
of Directors, and assist the Company as it capitalizes on the
opportunities presented by its portfolio of intellectual property
assets.
Neal
Goldman was appointed to the Board in August 2012. Mr.
Goldman is currently president, chief compliance officer and a
director of Goldman Capital Management, Inc., an employee owned
investment advisor that he founded in 1985. Additionally, Mr.
Goldman is Chairman of Charles and Colvard, LTD, a specialty
jewelry company. Mr. Goldman also served as a member of the
Board of Directors and Compensation Committee for Blyth, Inc., a
New York Stock Exchange-listed designer and marketer of home
decorative and fragrance products.
Mr.
Goldman is the Company’s largest shareholder and has
significant investment experience. As a result, the
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee believes that Mr.
Goldman can provide valuable guidance to the Board of Directors as
it seeks to build shareholder value.
Charles
Crocker was appointed to
the Board in September 2012. Mr. Crocker currently serves as
Chairman and CEO of Crocker Capital, a private investment company.
Mr. Crocker also serves as a director of Teledyne Technologies,
Inc. (NYSE:TDY), Bailard, Inc. and Mercator MedSystems. Beyond his
corporate duties, Mr. Crocker serves as a Trustee of the Mary A.
Crocker Trust, the Cypress Lawn Cemetery Association and the Fine
Arts Museums Foundation of San Francisco. Mr. Crocker received his
B.S. degree from Stanford University and M.B.A. from the University
of California, Berkley.
The
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee believes that Mr.
Crocker’s significant experience serving on boards of
directors, together with his investment experience, assists the
Company’s Board of Directors in its deliberations and
contributes to the governance of the Board.
Dana
Kammersgard was appointed to
the Board in May of 2016. Mr. Kammersgard is currently the Executive Vice President, Cloud
Systems and Solutions for Seagate Technology, where he is
responsible for all storage systems related products and
strategies. Prior to joining Seagate Systems in 2015, he served as
the President, CEO and a director of Dot Hill System Corp.
(“Dot
Hill”) since March 2006.
He served as President of Dot Hill from August 2004 to March 2006.
From August 1999 to August 2004, Mr. Kammersgard served as Dot
Hill’s Chief Technical Officer. Mr. Kammersgard was a founder
of Artecon, where he served as a director from its inception in
1984 until the company’s merger with Box Hill Systems Corp.
in August 1999. At Artecon, Mr. Kammersgard served in various
positions, including Secretary and Senior Vice President of
Engineering from March 1998 until August 1999, and as Vice
President of Sales and Marketing from March 1997 until March 1998.
Prior to cofounding Artecon, Mr. Kammersgard was the Director of
Software Development at Calma, a division of General Electric
Company. Mr. Kammersgard holds a B.A. in chemistry from the
University of California, San Diego.
The
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee believes that Mr.
Kammersgard’s engineering and technical experience, coupled
with his senior executive management experience with technology
companies, is valuable to the Company’s Board of Directors
and senior management given the technical issues and marketing
challenges facing the Company.
Charles
Frischer was appointed to the
Board in September of 2017. Mr. Frischer currently
works as self-employed private investor, a role he has occupied
since 2009, and serves as General Partner of LF Partners, LLC.
Previously, he served as a Principal at Zephyr Management, L.P.
from 2005 to 2008. Prior to that, he served as a Senior Vice
President at Capri Capital, where he originated commercial loans,
from 1995 to 2005, and as General Manager of Ericson Memorial
Studios from 1993 to 1994. Mr. Frischer holds a B.A. from Cornell
University.
The
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee believes that Mr.
Frischer’s background with capital markets and public
companies is valuable to the Company’s Board of Directors and
senior management.
Robert T.
Clutterbuck was appointed to
the Board as a Series A Director in September of 2017. Mr.
Clutterbuck is the Founder, and has served as the Managing Director
and Portfolio Manager at Clutterbuck Capital Management LLC, since
2006. Mr. Clutterbuck gained more than 30 years of experience at
McDonald & Company Investments, Inc., where he specialized in
advising affluent clients, professionals and corporate executives
on investment management, financial planning, estate preservation
and wealth transfer strategies. During his time at McDonald &
Company, Mr. Clutterbuck served as Chairman and Chief Executive
Partner of Key Capital Partners, and as Chief Executive Officer of
McDonald Investments Inc. from 2000 to 2002. Prior to 2000, Mr.
Clutterbuck served in several senior management positions within
McDonald Investments Inc., including as Chief Financial Officer and
Executive Managing Director of McDonald & Co. Securities, Inc.,
as Treasurer of McDonald & Co. Investments, Inc., and as
President and Chief Operating Officer of McDonald & Co.
Securities, Inc. Currently, Mr. Clutterbuck serves as an
Independent Director of Westmoreland Resources GP, LLC (NYSE:
WMLP), a position he has held since January 6,
2015. Mr. Clutterbuck holds a
B.A. from Ohio Wesleyan University and an M.B.A from the University
of Pennsylvania Wharton School of
Business.
The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee
believes that Mr. Clutterbuck’s background with capital
markets and public companies is valuable to the Company’s
Board of Directors and senior
management.
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting
Compliance
Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires
our directors and executive officers, and persons who beneficially
own more than 10% of a registered class of our equity securities,
to file with the SEC initial reports of ownership and reports of
changes in ownership of our common stock and other equity
securities. Such persons are required by SEC regulations to furnish
us with copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file.
To our knowledge, based solely
on a review of the copies of such reports furnished to us and
written representations that no other reports were required, during
the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017, all Section 16(a)
filing requirements were complied with in a timely
manner.
Code of Ethics
The Company has adopted a Code of Business Conduct
and Ethics policy that
applies to our directors and employees (including the
Company’s principal executive officer, principal financial
officer, principal accounting officer or controller, or persons
performing similar functions). The Company intends to promptly
disclose (i) the nature of any amendment to this code of ethics
that applies to our principal executive officer, principal
financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller, or
persons performing similar functions and (ii) the nature of any
waiver, including an implicit waiver, from a provision of this code
of ethics that is granted to one of these specified individuals,
the name of such person who is granted the waiver and the date of
the waiver on our website in the future. A copy of our
Code of Business Conduct and Ethics can be obtained from our
website at http://www.iwsinc.com.
Board Leadership Structure
Our
Board of Directors has discretion to determine whether to separate
or combine the roles of Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the
Board. S. James Miller has served in both roles since 1996, and our
Board continues to believe that his combined role is most
advantageous to the Company and our stockholders, as Mr. Miller
possesses in-depth knowledge of the issues, opportunities and risks
facing us, our business and our industry and is best positioned to
fulfill the responsibilities of our Chief Executive Officer, as
well as the Chairman’s responsibility to develop meeting
agendas that focus the Board’s time and attention on the most
critical matters and to facilitate constructive dialogue among
Board members on strategic issues.
In
addition to Mr. Miller’s leadership, the Board maintains
effective independent oversight through a number of governance
practices, including open and direct communication with management,
input on meeting agendas, and regular executive
sessions.
Board Role in Risk Assessment
Management,
in consultation with outside professionals, as applicable,
identifies risks associated with the Company’s operations,
strategies and financial statements. Risk assessment is also
performed through periodic reports received by the Audit Committee
from management, counsel and the Company’s independent
registered public accountants relating to risk assessment and
management. Audit Committee members meet privately in executive
sessions with representatives of the Company’s independent
registered public accountants. The Board also provides risk
oversight through its periodic reviews of the financial and
operational performance of the Company.
Director Independence
Our
Board of Directors has determined that all of its members, other
than Mr. Miller, who serves as the Company’s Chief Executive
Officer, and Mr. Goldman, who beneficially owns
approximately 40.8% of the Company’s common stock, are
“independent” within the meaning of the NASDAQ Stock
Market Rules and SEC rules regarding
independence.
Committees of the Board of Directors
Our
Board of Directors has an Audit Committee, a Compensation Committee
and a Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, each of which
has the composition and responsibilities described
below.
Audit Committee
The Audit Committee provides
assistance to the Board of Directors in fulfilling its legal and
fiduciary obligations in matters involving our accounting,
auditing, financial reporting, internal control and legal
compliance functions by approving the services performed by our
independent accountants and reviewing their reports regarding our
accounting practices and systems of internal accounting controls.
The Audit Committee also oversees the audit efforts of our
independent accountants and takes those actions as it deems
necessary to satisfy it that the accountants are independent of
management. The Audit Committee currently consists of Messrs. Hamm
(Chairman), Carey and Loesch, each of whom is a non-management
member of our Board of Directors. Mr. Hamm is also our Audit
Committee financial expert, as currently defined under current SEC
rules. The Audit Committee met 4 times during the year ended December 31,
2017. We believe that the composition of our Audit
Committee meets the criteria for independence under, and the
functioning of our Audit Committee complies with the applicable
NASDAQ Stock Market Rules and SEC rules and
regulations.
Compensation Committee
The Compensation Committee determines
our general compensation policies and the compensation provided to
our directors and officers. The Compensation Committee also reviews
and determines bonuses for our officers and other employees. In
addition, the Compensation Committee reviews and determines
equity-based compensation for our directors, officers, employees
and consultants and administers our stock option plans. The
Compensation Committee currently consists of Messrs. Carey
(Chairman), Cronin and Goldman, each of whom is a non-management
member of our Board of Directors. The Compensation Committee
met 4 times during the year ended December 31, 2017.
Although Messrs. Carey and Cronin meet the criteria for
independence under the applicable NASDAQ Stock Market Rules and SEC
rules and regulations, Mr. Goldman is not considered independent
under such requirements.
Nominating and
Corporate Governance Committee
The
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is responsible for
making recommendations to the Board of Directors regarding
candidates for directorships and the size and composition of the
Board. In addition, the Nominating and Corporate Governance
Committee is responsible for overseeing our corporate governance
guidelines and reporting and making recommendations to the Board
concerning corporate governance matters. The Nominating and
Corporate Governance Committee currently consists of all the
nonemployee members of the Board. The Nominating and
Corporate Governance Committee met 4 times during the year
ended December 31, 2017.
Indemnification of Officers and Directors
To
the extent permitted by Delaware law, the Company will
indemnify its directors and officers against expenses and
liabilities they incur to defend, settle, or satisfy any civil
or criminal action brought against them on account
of their being or having been Company directors or officers
unless, in any such action, they are adjudged to have acted
with gross negligence or willful
misconduct.
Executive Compensation Discussion and Analysis
Overview of Compensation Program
The
Compensation Committee of our Board of Directors has responsibility
for establishing, implementing and monitoring adherence to our
compensation philosophy. The Board of Directors has delegated to
the Compensation Committee the responsibility for determining our
compensation policies and procedures for senior management,
including the named executive officers, periodically reviewing
these policies and procedures, and making recommendations
concerning executive compensation to be considered by the full
board of directors, when such approval is required under any of our
plans or policies or by applicable laws. The Compensation Committee
also has the principal responsibility for the administration of our
stock plans, including the approval of stock option grants to the
named executive officers.
The
compensation received by our named executive officers in fiscal
year 2017 is set forth in the Summary Compensation Table, below.
For 2017, the named executive officers included: (i) S. James
Miller, Jr., Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive
Officer; (ii) Wayne Wetherell, Senior Vice President, Chief
Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer; (iii) David Harding,
Senior Vice-President and Chief Technical Officer; and (iv) Robert
Brown, Vice President, Sales and Business Development. David
Somerville was appointed as an executive officer of the Company on
January 8, 2018, after the end of the 2017 fiscal year, and thus is
not included in the Summary Compensation Table, below.
Compensation Philosophy
In
general, our executive compensation policies are designed to
recruit, retain and motivate qualified executives by providing them
with a competitive total compensation package based in large part
on the executive’s contribution to our financial and
operational success, the executive’s personal performance and
increases in stockholder value as measured by the price of our
common stock. We believe that the total compensation paid to our
executives should be fair, reasonable and competitive.
We
seek to have a balanced approach to executive compensation with
each primary element of compensation (base salary, variable
compensation and equity incentives) designed to play a specific
role. Overall, we design our compensation programs to allow for the
recruitment, retention and motivation of the key executives and
high-level talent required in order for us to:
●
achieve or exceed our annual financial plan and achieve
profitability;
●
make continuous progression towards achieving our long-term
strategic objectives to be a high-growth company with growing
profitability; and
●
increase our share price to provide greater value to our
stockholders.
Role of Executive Officers in Compensation Decisions
The Compensation
Committee considers action on executive
compensation annually. They discuss their proposed actions
with the Chief Executive Officer and make recommendations for any
changes to the Company’s Board of
Directors. Only the
Compensation Committee and the Board of Directors are authorized to
approve the compensation for any named executive officer. Because
our CEO is also a member of our Board of Directors, he does not
participate in any conversation or approvals related to his
compensation. Compensation of new executives is based on hiring
negotiations between the individuals and our CEO and/or
Compensation Committee.
Elements of Compensation
Consistent
with our compensation philosophy and objectives, we offer executive
compensation packages consisting of the following three
components:
●
base salary;
●
annual incentive compensation (in the form of bonuses or
otherwise); and
●
equity awards pursuant to the terms and
conditions of our 1999 Stock Award Plan (the
“1999
Plan”).
In
each fiscal year, the Compensation Committee determines the amount
and relative weighting of each component for all executives,
including the named executive officers. Base salaries are paid in
fixed amounts and thus do not encourage risk taking. For 2017, we
had no incentive bonus programs.
We
also have issued stock options focusing the recipients on the
achievement of certain short- and longer-term goals and objectives.
The Compensation Committee believes that these awards do not
encourage unnecessary or excessive risk taking because the ultimate
value of the awards is tied to our stock price, and the vesting
schedules align our employees’ interests even more closely
with those of our investors.
Base Salary
Because our compensation philosophy stresses
performance-based awards, base salary is intended to be a smaller
portion of total executive compensation relative to long-term
equity. Therefore, we target executive base salary at the median
level of the compensation guidelines that have been approved by the
Compensation Committee. In addition, the Compensation Committee
takes into account the executive’s scope of responsibility
and significance to the execution of our long-term strategy, past
accomplishments, experience and personal performance and compares
each executive’s base salary with those of the other members
of senior management. The Compensation Committee may give different
weighting to each of these factors for each executive, as it deems
appropriate. The Compensation Committee did not retain a
compensation consultant or determine a compensation peer group for
2017. In 2017, there were no changes to the base salaries paid to our named
executive officers except for
the contractually specified cost of living
adjustments.
Annual Incentive Compensation
The
Compensation Committee has not adopted an executive bonus plan for
2018.
Equity Awards
Although
we do not have a mandated policy regarding the ownership of shares
of common stock by officers and directors, we believe that granting
equity awards to executives and other key employees on an ongoing
basis gives them a strong incentive to maximize stockholder value
and aligns their interests with those of our other stockholders on
a long-term basis. Our 1999 Plan enables us to grant equity awards,
as well as other types of stock-based compensation, to our
executive officers and other employees. Under authority delegated
to it by the board of directors, the Compensation Committee reviews
and approves all equity awards granted to named executive officers
under the 1999 Plan. Typically, the options granted upon the
executive’s hire vest over three years with a third vesting
on the one-year anniversary, and the remainder vesting quarterly
over the next eight quarters. The options granted to executives in
connection with an annual performance review typically begin
vesting on the one-year anniversary of the grant date, and vest
ratably over the following eight quarters. Our general policy is to
grant the options with an exercise price equal to fair market
value, which currently is the closing price of our Common Stock, as
reported by the OTCQB, on the grant date.
We
intend to grant equity awards to achieve retention and
motivation:
●
upon the hiring of key executives and other personnel;
●
annually, when we review progress against corporate and personal
goals; and
●
when we believe that competitive forces or economic conditions
threaten to cause our key executives to lose their motivation
and/or where retention of these key executives is in
jeopardy.
With
the Compensation Committee’s approval, we grant options to
purchase shares of Common Stock when we initially hire executives
and other employees, as a long-term performance incentive. The
Compensation Committee has determined the size of the initial
option grants to newly hired executives with reference to existing
guidelines and hiring negotiations with the individual, in addition
to other relevant information regarding the size and type of
compensation package considered necessary to enable us to recruit,
retain and motivate the executive.
Historically,
no employee was eligible for an annual performance grant until the
employee had worked for us for at least sixty days. The
Compensation Committee reviews the CEO’s and other
executives’ performance and determines whether they should be
granted an option to purchase additional shares. Aside from stock
award grants in connection with annual performance reviews, we do
not have a policy of granting additional awards to executives and,
consequently, the Board of Directors and the Compensation Committee
has not adopted a policy with respect to granting awards in
coordination with the release of material non-public
information.
In
determining the size of equity awards the Compensation Committee
takes into account the executive’s current position with and
responsibilities to us.
Only
the Board of Directors or the Compensation Committee may approve
options or other equity-based compensation to our executives.
However, the Board of Directors has authorized the CEO to approve
option grants to non-executive employees. All such grants must be
consistent with equity incentive guidelines approved by the
Compensation Committee. The exercise price for such grants must be
equal to the most recent closing price of a share of the Common
Stock as reported by the OTCQB on the date of grant.
Going
forward, we intend to continue to evaluate and consider equity
grants to our executives on an annual basis. We expect to consider
potential equity awards for executives at the same time as we
annually review our employees’ performance and determine
whether to award grants for all employees.
Accounting and Tax Considerations
Our Compensation Committee has reviewed the
impact of tax and accounting treatment on the various components of
our executive compensation program. Section 162(m) of the
Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”) generally disallows a tax deduction to
publicly held companies for compensation paid to
“covered” executive officers, to the extent that
compensation paid to such an officer exceeds $1.0 million
during the taxable year. We endeavor to award compensation that
will be deductible for income tax purposes, though other factors
will also be considered. Our Compensation Committee may authorize
compensation payments that do not comply with the exemptions to
Section 162(m) when we believe that such payments are
appropriate to attract and retain executive
talent.
Say-on-Pay
Our stockholders have not yet had the opportunity to provide
feedback on our executive compensation through an advisory vote, as
we have not held an annual meeting of stockholders since 2011, at
which time we were not required to hold a “Say-on-Pay”
vote as we followed the disclosure guidelines of a Smaller
Reporting Company.
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider
Participation
As
of December 31, 2017, the members of our Compensation Committee
were, and currently are, David Carey (Chairman), John Cronin and
Neal Goldman. None of the current or past members of our
Compensation Committee is or has been an officer or employee of our
company. None of our executive officers currently serves, or in the
past year has served, as a member of the compensation committee (or
other board committee performing equivalent functions or, in the
absence of any such committee, the entire board of directors) or
director of any entity that has one or more executive officers
serving on our Compensation Committee or our Board of
Directors.
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT
The
Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed with management
the Compensation Discussion and Analysis provisions to be included
in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2017. Based on this review and discussion, the
Compensation Committee has recommended to the board of directors
that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this
in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2017.
The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors:
|
David Carey (Chairman)
John Cronin
Neal Goldman
|
Summary Compensation Table
The following table sets forth certain information
about the compensation paid or accrued during the years ended
December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 to our Chief Executive Officer and
each of our four most highly compensated executive officers who
were serving as executive officers at December 31, 2017, 2016 and
2015, and whose annual compensation exceeded $100,000 during such
year or would have exceeded $100,000 during such year if the
executive officer were employed by the Company for the entire
fiscal year (collectively the “Named Executive
Officers”).
Name and Principal Position
|
Year
|
Salary
|
Stock Awards
|
Option Awards
(1)(2)
|
All Other
Compensation
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S.
James Miller, Jr.
|
2017
|
$380,076
|
$-
|
$174,125
|
$19,913
|
(3)
|
$574,114
|
Chairman of the Board and
Chief Executive Officer
|
2016
|
$368,938
|
$-
|
$174,185
|
$19,816
|
|
$562,939
|
|
2015
|
$370,284
|
$-
|
$184,850
|
$21,551
|
|
$576,685
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wayne
G. Wetherell
|
2017
|
$211,319
|
$-
|
$57,467
|
$11,715
|
(4)
|
$280,501
|
Senior Vice President
Chief Financial Officer,
|
2016
|
$207,333
|
$-
|
$48,676
|
$11,787
|
|
$267,796
|
Secretary, and Treasurer
|
2015
|
$211,320
|
$-
|
$92,425
|
$13,714
|
|
$317,459
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
David
Harding
|
2017
|
$280,288
|
$-
|
$163,885
|
4,788
|
(5)
|
$448,961
|
Vice President and
Chief Technical Officer
|
2016
|
$242,955
|
$-
|
$150,807
|
$4,105
|
|
$397,867
|
|
2015
|
$234,400
|
$-
|
$154,041
|
$3,768
|
|
$392,209
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Robert Brown (7)
|
2017
|
$208,943
|
$-
|
$176,133
|
1,531
|
(6)
|
$386,607
|
Vice President Sales and
Business Development
|
2016
|
$187,292
|
$-
|
$161,843
|
$1,301
|
|
$350,436
|
|
2015
|
$97,500
|
$-
|
$466,042
|
$253
|
|
$563,795
|
(1)
|
|
All option awards were granted under the 1999 Plan.
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
(2)
|
|
The amounts presented in this column do not reflect the cash value
or realizable value of option grants to the named executive
officers during the year ended December 31, 2017. During the year
ended December 31, 2017, no named executive officer exercised an
option and therefore no value was realized during the reporting
period. The amounts reflect the grant date fair value of
the options awarded in the fiscal year ended December 31,
2017, 2016 and 2015 respectively, in accordance with the provisions
of FASB ASC Topic 718. We have elected to use the
Black-Scholes option-pricing model, which incorporates various
assumptions including volatility, expected life, and interest
rates. We are required to make various assumptions in the
application of the Black-Scholes option-pricing model and have
determined that the best measure of expected volatility is based on
the historical weekly volatility of our common stock. Historical
volatility factors utilized in our Black-Scholes computations range
from 58% to 103%. We have elected to estimate the expected life of
an award based upon the SEC approved “simplified
method” noted under the provisions of Staff Accounting
Bulletin No. 110. The expected term used by the Company during
the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 was 5.9 years. The
difference between the actual historical expected life and the
simplified method was immaterial. The interest rate used is the
risk-free interest rate and is based upon U.S. Treasury rates
appropriate for the expected term. Interest rates used in the
Company’s Black-Scholes calculations for the years ended
December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 was 2.6%. Dividend yield is zero,
as we do not expect to declare any dividends on our common shares
in the foreseeable future. In addition to the key assumptions used
in the Black-Scholes model, the estimated forfeiture rate at the
time of valuation is a critical assumption. We have estimated an
annualized forfeiture rate of 0% for corporate officers, 4.1% for
members of the Board of Directors and 6.0% for all other employees.
We review the expected forfeiture rate annually to determine if
that percent is still reasonable based on historical
experience.
|
|||||||||||||||||||
(3)
|
|
This amount includes premiums on life insurance and disability
insurance of $9,113 and matching 401(k) contributions of
$10,800.
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
(4)
|
|
This amount includes premiums on life insurance and disability
insurance of $3,077 and matching 401(k) contributions of
$8,638.
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
(5)
|
|
This amount includes premiums in life insurance and disability
insurance of $2,888 and matching 401(k) contributions of
$1,900.
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
(6)
|
|
This amount includes premiums on life insurance and disability
insurance of $1,531.
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
(7)
|
|
Mr. Brown joined the Company in June 2015.
|
Grants of
Plan Based Awards
There were no
grants of plan-based awards in 2017 to any named Executive
Officer.
Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal
Year-End
The
following table sets forth information regarding unexercised
options, stock that has not vested and equity incentive awards held
by each of the Named Executive Officers outstanding as of
December 31, 2017:
|
Option Awards
|
Stock Awards
|
||||
Name
|
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options:
Exercisable (#)
|
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options:
Unexercisable (#)
|
Option
Exercise
Price
($)
|
Option
Expiration
Date
|
Number of Shares That Have
Not Vested
(#)
|
Market Value of Shares That Have Not
Vested ($)
|
S.
James Miller, Jr.
|
100,000
|
—
|
$0.20
|
1/27/2019
|
—
|
$—
|
|
183,000
|
—
|
$0.73
|
1/29/2020
|
—
|
$—
|
|
225,000
|
—
|
$1.11
|
3/10/2021
|
—
|
$—
|
|
450,000
|
—
|
$0.92
|
2/2/2022
|
—
|
$—
|
|
100,000
|
—
|
$0.93
|
2/8/2023
|
—
|
$—
|
|
100,000
|
—
|
$1.93
|
10/29/2023
|
—
|
$—
|
|
50,000
|
-
|
$2.29
|
12/15/2024
|
—
|
$—
|
|
112,500
|
37,500
|
$1.73
|
9/14/2025
|
—
|
$—
|
|
125,000
|
175,000
|
$1.37
|
9/20/2026
|
—
|
$—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wayne
G. Wetherell
|
60,000
|
—
|
$0.20
|
1/27/2019
|
—
|
$—
|
|
60,000
|
—
|
$0.73
|
1/29/2020
|
—
|
$—
|
|
100,000
|
—
|
$0.92
|
2/2/2022
|
—
|
$—
|
|
10,000
|
—
|
$1.93
|
10/29/2023
|
—
|
$—
|
|
10,000
|
-
|
$2.29
|
12/15/2024
|
—
|
$—
|
|
56,250
|
18,750
|
$1.73
|
9/14/2025
|
—
|
$—
|
|
31,250
|
43,750
|
$1.37
|
9/20/2026
|
—
|
$—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
David
Harding
|
50,000
|
—
|
$0.20
|
1/27/2019
|
—
|
$—
|
|
80,000
|
—
|
$0.73
|
1/29/2020
|
—
|
$—
|
|
325,000
|
—
|
$0.92
|
2/2/2022
|
—
|
$—
|
|
100,000
|
—
|
$.93
|
2/8/2023
|
—
|
$—
|
|
75,000
|
—
|
$1.93
|
10/29/2023
|
—
|
$—
|
|
50,000
|
-
|
$2.29
|
12/15/2024
|
—
|
$—
|
|
93,752
|
31,248
|
$1.73
|
9/14/2025
|
—
|
$—
|
|
125,000
|
175,000
|
$1.37
|
9/20/2026
|
—
|
$—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Robert
Brown
|
225,000
|
75,000
|
$1.70
|
7/16/2025
|
—
|
$—
|
|
56,250
|
18,750
|
$1.73
|
9/14/2025
|
—
|
$—
|
|
31,250
|
43,750
|
$1.37
|
9/20/2026
|
—
|
$—
|
Employment Agreements
S. James
Miller, Jr. On October 1, 2005, we entered into an
employment agreement with Mr. Miller pursuant to which
Mr. Miller serves as President and Chief Executive Officer,
which agreement is currently set to expire on December 31, 2018.
Historically, Mr. Miller’s employment agreement has been
amended annually to extend the expiration date. The agreement
provides for annual base compensation in the amount of $291,048,
which amount, as a result of cost-of-living adjustments, has
increased to $376,456. Under this agreement, we will reimburse
Mr. Miller for reasonable expenses incurred in connection with
our business. Under the terms of the agreement, Mr. Miller
will be entitled to the following severance benefits if we
terminate his employment without cause or in the event of an
involuntary termination: (i) a lump sum cash payment equal to
twenty-four months base salary; (ii) continuation of
Mr. Miller’s fringe benefits and medical insurance for a
period of three years; and (iii) immediate vesting of 50% of
Mr. Miller’s outstanding stock options and restricted
stock awards. In the event that Mr. Miller’s employment
is terminated within six months prior to or thirteen months
following a change of control (defined below), Mr. Miller is
entitled to the severance benefits described above, except that
100% of Mr. Miller’s outstanding stock options and
restricted stock awards will immediately vest.
Wayne
Wetherell. On October 1, 2005, we entered into an
employment agreement with Mr. Wetherell pursuant to which
Mr. Wetherell will serve as our Chief Financial Officer,
which, as amended, terminated on December 31, 2017. Mr.
Wetherell is paid a semi-monthly base salary of $8.369.
David
Harding. On
May 21, 2007, we entered into a Change of
Control and Severance Benefits Agreement with Mr. David
Harding, our Vice President and Chief Technical Officer. This
agreement was originally for a two-year term, ending on
May 21, 2009; however, the agreement has been amended to
extend the expiration date to December 31, 2018. Under the terms of
the agreement, Mr. Harding is paid a semi-monthly base salary
of $11,458, and is entitled to
the following severance benefits if we terminate his employment
without cause or in the event of an involuntary termination:
(i) a lump sum cash payment equal to six months base salary;
and continuation of Mr. Harding’s medical and
disability insurance for a period of six months. In the event
that Mr. Harding’s employment is terminated within six
months prior to or thirteen months following a change of control
(defined below), Mr. Harding is entitled to the severance
benefits described above, except that 100% of
Mr. Harding’s outstanding stock options and restricted
stock awards will immediately
vest.
For purposes of the above-referenced agreements,
termination for “cause” means the executive’s
commission of a criminal act or an act of fraud, embezzlement,
breach of trust or other act of gross misconduct; violations of
policies or rules of the Company; refusal to follow the direction
given by the Company from time to time or breach of any covenant or
obligation under the above-referenced agreements or other
agreements with the Company; neglect of duty; misappropriation,
concealment, or conversion of any money or property of the Company;
intentional damage or destruction of property of the Company;
reckless conduct which endangers the safety of other persons or
property during the course of employment or while on premises
leased or owned by the Company; or a breach of any obligation or
requirement set forth in the above-referenced agreements. A
“change in control” as used in these agreements
generally means the occurrence of any of the following events:
(i) the acquisition by any person or group of 50% or more of
our outstanding voting stock; (ii) the consummation of a
merger, consolidation, reorganization, or similar transaction other
than a transaction: (1) in which substantially all of the
holders of our voting stock hold or receive directly or indirectly
50% or more of the voting stock of the resulting entity or a parent
company thereof, in substantially the same proportions as their
ownership of the Company immediately prior to the transaction, or
(2) in which the holders of our capital stock immediately
before such transaction will, immediately after such transaction,
hold as a group on a fully diluted basis the ability to elect at
least a majority of the directors of the surviving corporation (or
a parent company); (iii) there is consummated a sale, lease,
exclusive license, or other disposition of all or substantially all
of the consolidated assets of us and our Subsidiaries, other than a
sale, lease, license, or other disposition of all or substantially
all of the consolidated assets of us and our Subsidiaries to an
entity, 50% or more of the combined voting power of the voting
securities of which are owned by our stockholders in substantially
the same proportions as their ownership of the Company immediately
prior to such sale, lease, license, or other disposition;
or (iv) individuals who, on the date the applicable
agreement was adopted by the Board, are Directors (the
“Incumbent
Board”) cease for any
reason to constitute at least a majority of the Directors;
provided,
however, that if the
appointment or election (or nomination for election) of any new
Director was approved or recommended by a majority vote of the
members of the Incumbent Board then still in office, such new
member shall, for purposes of the applicable agreement, be
considered as a member of the Incumbent Board.
Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation
Plans
The
following table provides information as of December 31, 2017
regarding equity compensation plans approved by our security
holders and equity compensation plans that have not been approved
by our security holders:
Plan Category
|
Number of securities to be issued
upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants
and rights
|
Weighted-
Average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants
and rights
|
Number of securities remaining available
for future issuance under equity compensation plans
(excluding securities reflected in
column) (a)
|
|
(a)
|
(b)
|
(c)
|
Equity compensation plans approved by security
holders:
|
|
|
|
1999
Stock Award Plan, as amended and restated
|
6,093,512
|
$1.23
|
100,265
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
6,093,512
|
$1.23
|
100,265
|
Description of Equity Compensation Plans
1999 Stock Option Plan
The 1999 Stock Option Plan was adopted by the Company’s Board of
Directors on December 17, 1999. Under the terms of the 1999 Plan,
the Company could, originally, issue up to 350,000 non-qualified or
incentive stock options to purchase Common Stock of the Company.
Since then, a majority of the Company’s shareholders
subsequently approved an amendment to and restatement of the 1999
Plan to increase the share reserve for issuance to approximately
7.0 million shares of the Company’s Common Stock. The
1999 Plan prohibits the grant of stock option or stock appreciation
right awards with an exercise price less than fair market value of
Common Stock on the date of grant. The 1999 Plan also generally
prohibits the “re-pricing” of stock options or stock
appreciation rights, although awards may be bought-out for a
payment in cash or the Company’s stock. The 1999 Plan permits
the grant of stock-based awards other than stock options, including
the grant of “full value” awards such as restricted
stock, stock units and performance shares. The 1999 Plan permits
the qualification of awards under the plan (payable in either stock
or cash) as “performance-based compensation” within the
meaning of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue
Code.
CEO Pay Ratio
As
required by Item 402(u) of Regulation S-K under the Securities Act
of 1933, as amended, we are providing the following information
regarding the ratio of the annual total compensation of Mr. Miller,
our Chief Executive Officer compared to the median annual total
compensation of our other employees. We consider the pay ratio
specified below to be a reasonable estimate, calculated in a manner
that is intended to be consistent with Item 402(u) of Regulation
S-K.
We
determined our median employee based on our year-to-date
compensation from our Payroll Register for the period ending
December 31, 2017. The employee base included all 63 of our
employees in the United States and Canada. In determining annual
compensation for our Canadian employees, we used a currency
conversion rate of 1 CAD to 0.77940 USD. After we calculated the
annual compensation for all of our employees excepting Mr. Miller,
we sorted the list of employees by their total compensation and
chose the median number.
The
annual total compensation of our median employee (other than Mr.
Miller) for the period ending December 31, 2017 was $90,939.03. Mr.
Miller’s annual total compensation for the same period was
$574,114.
Based
on the foregoing, our estimate of the ratio of the annual total
compensation of the Chief Executive Officer to the median of the
annual compensation for all other employees was 6.3 to
1.
This
pay ratio is a reasonable estimate calculated in a manner
consistent with SEC rules based on our payroll and employment
records and the methodology described above. Because the SEC rules
for identifying the median compensated employee and calculating the
pay ratio based on that employee’s annual total compensation
allow companies to adopt a variety of methodologies, to apply
certain exclusions, and to make reasonable estimates and
assumptions that reflect their compensation practices, the pay
ratio reported by other companies may not be comparable to the pay
ratio reported above, as other companies may have different
employment and compensation practices and may utilize different
methodologies, exclusions, estimates and assumptions in calculating
their own pay ratios.
Director Compensation
Each of our non-employee directors receives equity
compensation in the form of stock options that vest monthly during
the year of service for serving
on the Board of Directors. Board members who also serve on the
Audit Committee receive additional monthly compensation of
$458 for the Chairman and
$208 for the remaining members
of the Audit Committee. Board members who also serve on the
Compensation Committee receive additional monthly compensation of
$417 for the Chairman and
$208 for the remaining members
of the Compensation Committee. The members of the Board
of Directors are also eligible for reimbursement for their expenses
incurred in attending Board meetings in accordance with our
policies. For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017 the total
amounts of compensation to non-employee directors (excluding
reimbursable expenses) was approximately $426,281, which amount was
paid $20,500 in cash with
the remainder paid in
Stock Options of the
Company.
Each
of our non-employee directors is also eligible to receive stock
option grants under the 1999 Plan. Options granted under the 1999
Plan are intended by us not to qualify as incentive stock options
under the Code.
The term of options granted under the 1999 Plan is
ten years. In the event of a merger of us with or into another
corporation or a consolidation, acquisition of assets or other
change-in-control transaction involving us, an equivalent option
will be substituted by the successor corporation;
provided,
however, that we may cancel
outstanding options upon consummation of the transaction by giving
at least thirty (30) days’
notice.
The
following table sets forth the compensation awarded to, earned by,
or paid to each person who served as a director during the year
ended December 31, 2017, other than a director who also served as
an executive officer:
|
|
Fees Earned or
Paid in Cash ($)
|
|
|
Stock
Awards ($)
|
|
|
Option
Awards
($) (1)
|
|
|
All Other Compensation ($)
|
|
|
Total ($)
|
|
|||||
Guy Steve Hamm
|
|
$
|
5,500
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
61,757
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
67,257
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
David Carey
|
|
$
|
7,500
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
61,757
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
69,257
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
David Loesch
|
|
$
|
2,500
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
61,757
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
64,257
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
John Cronin
|
|
$
|
2,500
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
61,757
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
64,257
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Neal Goldman
|
|
$
|
2,500
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
61,757
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
64,257
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charles Crocker
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
61,757
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
61,757
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dana Kammersgard
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
35,239
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
35,239
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mr. Charles Frischer
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mr. Robert T.
Clutterbuck
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
(1)
|
The amounts reflect the grant date fair value of options recognized
as compensation in 2017, in accordance with the provisions of FASB
ASC Topic 718, and thus may include amounts from awards granted
prior to 2017. Assumptions used in the calculation of these amounts
are included in Notes to the Consolidated Financial
Statements.
|
ITEM 12.
|
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND
MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDERS MATTERS
|
As
of March 15, 2018, we had three classes of voting stock
outstanding: (i) Common Stock; (ii) our Series A Preferred; and
(iii) our Series B Preferred. The following tables sets forth
information regarding shares of Series A Preferred, Series B
Preferred and Common Stock beneficially owned as of March 15, 2018
by:
(i)
Each of our officers and directors;
(ii)
All officer and directors as a group; and
(iii)
Each person known by us to beneficially own five percent or more of
the outstanding shares of our Common Stock, Series A Preferred and
Series B Preferred. Percent ownership is calculated based on 31,021
shares of Series A Preferred, 239,400 shares of Series B Preferred
and 94,167,836 shares Common Stock outstanding at December 31,
2017.
Unless
otherwise noted, the addresses of the individuals listed below are
10815 Rancho Bernardo Road, Suite 310, San Diego, California
92127.
Beneficial Ownership of Series A Preferred
Name, Address and Title (if applicable)
|
Series A Convertible
Preferred Stock (2)
|
% Ownership of Class (2)
|
|
|
|
Directors and Named Executive Officers:
(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
S.
James Miller, Jr., Chairman, Chief Executive
Officer
|
100
|
*
|
Neal
Goldman, Director
|
3,133
|
10.1%
|
Robert
T. ClutterBuck, Director
|
2,148
|
6.9%
|
Charles
Frischer, Director
|
3,105
|
10.0%
|
Wayne
Wetherell, SVP of Administration, Chief Financial Officer,
Secretary
|
25
|
*
|
|
|
|
Total
beneficial ownership of directors and officers as a group (13
persons):
|
8,511
|
27.4%
|
5%
Stockholders:
|
|
|
CF
Special Situation Fund I, LP
|
5,605
|
18.1%
|
CAP
1 LLC
|
3,000
|
6.1%
|
* less than 1%
(1)
(2)
|
Each of the Company’s officers and directors who do not hold
shares of Series A Preferred were excluded from this
table.
Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the rules of
the SEC and generally includes voting or investment power with
respect to securities.
|
Beneficial Ownership of Series B Preferred
Name, Address and Title (if applicable) (1)
|
Series B Convertible
Preferred Stock (2)
|
% Ownership of Class (2)
|
Darrelyn
Carpenter
|
28,000
|
12%
|
Frederick
C. Orton
|
20,000
|
8%
|
Howard
Harrison
|
20,000
|
8%
|
Wesley
Hampton
|
16,000
|
7%
|
(1)
|
Each of the Company’s officers and directors who do not hold
shares of Series A Preferred were excluded from this
table.
|
(2)
|
Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the rules of
the SEC and generally includes voting or investment power with
respect to securities.
|
Beneficial Ownership of Common Stock
Name and Address
|
Number of Shares (1)
|
Percent of
Class (2)
|
|
|
|
Directors and Named Executive
Officers
(3):
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. James Miller, Jr., Chairman, Chief
Executive Officer (4)
|
2,415,530
|
2.5%
|
David Carey Director (5)
|
232,522
|
*
|
G. Steve Hamm, Director (6)
|
232,608
|
*
|
David Loesch, Director (7)
|
260,730
|
*
|
Neal Goldman, Director (8)
|
41,355,978
|
40.8%
|
John Cronin, Director (9)
|
193,022
|
*
|
Charles Crocker, Director (10)
|
1,068,022
|
1.1%
|
Dana W. Kammersgard (11)
|
175,838
|
*
|
Robert T. ClutterBuck, Director
(12)
|
2,204,924
|
2.3%
|
Charles Frischer, Director (13)
|
2,978,509
|
3.1%
|
Wayne Wetherell, SVP of Administration, Chief
Financial Officer, Secretary (14)
|
658,411
|
*
|
David Harding, Chief Technical Officer
(15)
|
1,039,168
|
1.1%
|
Robert Brown, Vice President, Sales and Business
Development (16)
|
312,500
|
*
|
|
|
|
Total
beneficial ownership of directors and officers as a group (13
persons):
|
53,127,762
|
48.0%
|
* less than 1%
(1)
|
All entries exclude beneficial ownership of shares issuable
pursuant to options that have not vested or that are not otherwise
exercisable as of the date hereof, or which will not become vested
or exercisable within 60 days of March 15, 2018.
|
(2)
|
Percentages are rounded to nearest one-tenth of one percent.
Percentages are based on 94,229,505 shares of Common Stock
outstanding as of March 15, 2018. Options that are presently
exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of March 15, 2018 are
deemed to be beneficially owned by the stockholder holding the
options for the purpose of computing the percentage ownership of
that stockholder, but are not treated as outstanding for the
purpose of computing the percentage of any other
stockholder.
|
|
|
(3)
|
As of March 15, Mr. Somerville did not beneficially own any shares
of Company Common Stock, and has thus been excluded from this
table.
|
|
|
(4)
|
Includes 75,201 shares held jointly with spouse,
1,483,000 shares issuable upon exercise of stock options, each
exercisable within 60 days of March 15, 2018, and 86,957 shares
issuable upon the conversion of Series A Preferred.
|
|
|
(5)
|
Includes 130,836 shares issuable upon exercise of stock options
exercisable within 60 days of March 15, 2018.
|
|
|
(6)
|
Includes 133,336 shares issuable upon exercise of stock options
exercisable within 60 days of March 15, 2018.
|
|
|
(7)
|
Includes 130,836 shares issuable upon exercise of stock options,
each exercisable within 60 days of March 15, 2018.
|
|
|
(8)
|
Includes 2,724,348 shares issuable upon the conversion of Series A
Preferred and 103,336 shares issuable upon exercise of stock
options, each exercisable within 60 days of March 15, 2018, and
4,400,000 shares issuable upon the conversion of Convertible Notes.
Mr. Goldman exercises sole voting and dispositive power over
38,208,278 shares, and shared voting and dispositive power over
3,147,700 reported shares, of which 3,000,000 shares are owned by
the Goldman Family 2012 GST Trust and 147,700 shares are owed by
The Neal and Marlene Goldman Foundation.
|
|
|
(9)
|
Includes 153,336 shares issuable upon exercise of stock options
exercisable within 60 days of March 15, 2018.
|
|
|
(10)
|
Includes 153,336 shares issuable upon exercise of stock
options exercisable within 60 days of March 15, 2018and 400,000
shares issuable upon the conversion of Convertible
Notes.
|
|
|
(11)
|
Includes 90,338 shares issuable upon exercise of stock options
exercisable within 60 days of March 15, 2018.
|
|
|
(12)
|
Includes 1,867,826 shares issuable upon the conversion of Series A
Preferred and 19,000 shares issuable upon exercise of stock options
exercisable within 60 days of March 15, 2018.
|
|
|
(13)
|
Includes 2,700,000 shares issuable upon the conversion of Series A
Preferred and 19,000 shares issuable upon exercise of stock options
exercisable within 60 days of March 15, 2018.
|
|
|
(14)
|
Includes 21,739 shares issuable upon the conversion of Series A
Preferred and 340,000 shares issuable upon exercise of stock
options exercisable within 60 days of March 15,
2018.
|
|
|
(15)
|
Includes 934,168 shares issuable upon exercise of stock options
exercisable within 60 days of March 15, 2018.
|
|
|
(16)
|
Includes 312,500 shares issuable upon exercise of stock options
exercisable within 60 days of March 15, 2018.
|
ITEM 13.
|
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED
TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE
|
Related Party Convertible Notes
On November 14, 2008, the Company entered into a
series of convertible promissory notes (the
“Related-Party Convertible
Notes”), aggregating
$110,000 with certain officers and members of the Company’s
Board of Directors, including S. James Miller, the Company’s
Chief Executive Officer and Chairman. The Related-Party Convertible
Notes bear interest at 7.0% per annum and were originally due
February 14, 2009. In conjunction with the original issuance of the
Related-Party Convertible Notes in 2008, the Company issued an
aggregate of 149,996 warrants to the note holders to purchase
shares of Common Stock of the Company. The warrants have an
exercise price $0.50 per share and may be exercised at any time
from November 14, 2008 until November 14, 2013. No warrants to
purchase shares of Common Stock were outstanding and exercisable as
of December 31, 2017, and no warrants were issued and outstanding
as of December 31, 2017.
The
Company did not repay the Related-Party Convertible Notes on the
due date. In August 2009, the Company received from the
Related-Party Convertible Note holders a waiver of default and
extension to January 31, 2010 of the maturity date of the
Related-Party Convertible Notes. As consideration for the waiver
and note extension, the Company issued to the Related-Party
Convertible Note holders an aggregate of 150,000 warrants to
purchase shares of the Company’s Common Stock. The warrants
have an exercise price of $0.50 per share and expire on August 25,
2014, of which no warrants to purchase shares of Common Stock were
outstanding and exercisable as of December 31, 201.
On
January 21, 2013, the holders of the Related-Party Convertible
Notes agreed to extend the due date on their respective convertible
notes to be due and payable not later than June 30, 2015, however,
the Related-Party Convertible Notes will be callable at any time,
at the option of the note holder, prior to June 30, 2015. During
the year ended December 31, 2014, holders of Related-Party
Convertible Notes in the principal amount of $85,034 elected to
convert their respective Related-Party Convertible Notes into
154,607 shares of Common Stock.
Lines of Credit
In March 2013, the Company and Neal Goldman, a
member of the Company’s Board of Directors
(“Goldman”), entered into a line of credit (the
“Goldman Line of
Credit”) with available
borrowings of up to $2.5 million. In March 2014, the Goldman Line
of Credit’s borrowing was increased to an aggregate total of
$3.5 million (the “Amendment”). Pursuant to the terms and conditions of
the Amendment, Goldman had the right to convert up to $2.5 million
of the outstanding balance of the Goldman Line of Credit into
shares of the Company’s Common Stock for $0.95 per share. Any
remaining outstanding balance was convertible into shares of
the Company’s Common Stock for $2.25 per
share.
As consideration for the initial Goldman Line of
Credit, the Company issued a warrant to Goldman, exercisable for
1,052,632 shares of the Company’s Common Stock (the
“Line
of Credit Warrant”). The
Goldman Line of Credit Warrant had a term of two years from the
date of issuance and an exercise price of $0.95 per
share. As consideration for entering into the Amendment,
the Company issued to Goldman a second warrant, exercisable for
177,778 shares of the Company’s Common Stock (the
“Amendment
Warrant”). The Amendment
Warrant expired on March 27, 2015 and had an exercise price of
$2.25 per share.
In April 2014, the Company and Goldman entered
into a further amendment to the Goldman Line of Credit to decrease
the available borrowings to $3.0 million (the
“Second
Amendment”). Contemporaneous with the execution
of the Second Amendment, the Company entered into a new unsecured
line of credit with Charles Crocker, a member of the
Company’s Board of Directors (“Crocker”), with available borrowings of up to
$500,000 (the “Crocker LOC”), which amount was convertible into
shares of the Company’s Common Stock for $2.25 per share. As
a result of these amendments, total available borrowings under the
Lines of Credit available to the Company remained unchanged at a
total of $3.5 million. In connection with the Second Amendment,
Goldman assigned and transferred to Crocker one-half of the
Amendment Warrant.
In December 2014, the Company and Goldman entered
into a further amendment to the Goldman Line of Credit to increase
the available borrowing to $5.0 million and extend the maturity
date of the Goldman Line of Credit to March 27, 2017 (the
“Third
Amendment”). Also, as a
result of the Third Amendment, Goldman had the right to convert up
to $2.5 million outstanding principal, plus any accrued but unpaid
interest (“Outstanding
Balance”) into shares of
the Company’s Common Stock for $0.95 per share, the next
$500,000 Outstanding Balance into shares of Common Stock for $2.25
per share and any remaining outstanding balance thereafter into
shares of Common Stock for $2.30 per share. The Third Amendment
also modified the definition of a “Qualified Financing”
to mean a debt or equity financing resulting in gross proceeds to
the Company of at least $5.0 million.
In
February 2015, as a result of the Series E Financing, the Company
issued 1,978 shares of Series E Preferred to Goldman to satisfy
$1,950,000 in principal borrowings under the Goldman Line of Credit
plus approximately $28,000 in accrued interest. As a result of the
Series E Financing, the Company’s borrowing capacity under
the Goldman Line of Credit was reduced to $3,050,000 with the
maturity date unchanged and the Crocker LOC was terminated in
accordance with its terms.
In March 2016, the Company and Goldman entered
into a fourth amendment to the Goldman Line of Credit (the
“Fourth
Amendment”) solely to (i)
increase available borrowings to $5.0 million; (ii) extend the
maturity date to June 30, 2017, and (iii) provide for the
conversion of the outstanding balance due under the terms of the
Goldman Line of Credit into that number of fully paid and
non-assessable shares of the Company’s Common Stock as is
equal to the quotient obtained by dividing the outstanding balance
by $1.25.
Contemporaneous with the execution of the Fourth
Amendment, the Company entered into a new $500,000 Line of Credit
(the “New Crocker
LOC”) with available
borrowings of up to $500,000 with Crocker, which replaced the
original Crocker LOC that terminated as a result of the
consummation of the Series E Financing. Similar to the Fourth
Amendment, the New Crocker LOC with Crocker originally matured
on June 30, 2017, and provides for the conversion of the
outstanding balance due under the terms of the New Crocker LOC into
that number of fully paid and non-assessable shares of the
Company’s Common Stock as is equal to the quotient obtained
by dividing the outstanding balance by $1.25.
On
December 27, 2016, in connection with the consummation of the
Series G Financing, the Company and Goldman agreed to enter
into the
Fifth Amendment (the “Line
of Credit Amendment”) to the Goldman
Line of Credit to provide the Company with the ability to borrow up
to $5.5 million under the terms of the Goldman Line of Credit. In
addition, the Maturity Date, as defined in the Goldman Line of
Credit was amended to be December 31, 2017. The Line of Credit
Amendment was executed on January 23, 2017.
In addition, on January 23, 2017, the Company and Crocker amended
the New Crocker LOC to extend the maturity date thereof to December
31, 2017.
On May 10, 2017, Goldman and Crocker agreed to
further extend the maturity dates of Lines of Credit to December
31, 2018.
The
following table sets forth the Company’s activity under its
Lines of Credit for the periods indicated:
Balance
outstanding under Lines of Credit as of December 31,
2015
|
$—
|
Borrowings
under Lines of Credit
|
2,650
|
Repayments
|
—
|
Balance
outstanding under Lines of Credit as of December 31,
2016
|
$2,650
|
Borrowings
under Lines of Credit
|
3,350
|
Repayments
|
—
|
Balance
outstanding under Lines of Credit as of December 31,
2017
|
$6,000
|
Review, Approval or Ratification of Transactions with Related
Persons
As
provided in the charter of our Audit Committee, it is our policy
that we will not enter into any transactions required to be
disclosed under Item 404 of the SEC’s Regulation S-K unless
the Audit Committee or another independent body of our Board of
Directors first reviews and approves the
transactions.
In
addition, pursuant to our Code of Ethical Conduct and Business
Practices, all employees, officers and directors of ours and our
subsidiaries are prohibited from engaging in any relationship or
financial interest that is an actual or potential conflict of
interest with us without approval. Employees, officers and
directors are required to provide written disclosure to the Chief
Executive Officer as soon as they have any knowledge of a
transaction or proposed transaction with an outside individual,
business or other organization that would create a conflict of
interest or the appearance of one.
ITEM 14.
|
PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND
SERVICES
|
The following table represents aggregate fees
billed to the Company for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2017
and 2016 by Mayer Hoffman McCann
P.C. (“MHM”), the
Company’s independent registered public accounting
firm. MHM leases substantially all its personnel, who work under
the control of MHM shareholders, from wholly owned subsidiaries of
CBIZ, Inc., in an alternative practice
structure.
|
Fiscal Year Ended
|
|
|
2017
|
2016
|
|
|
|
Audit
fees
|
$248,000
|
$202,000
|
|
|
|
Audit-related
fees
|
—
|
—
|
|
|
|
Tax
fees
|
—
|
—
|
|
|
|
All
other fees
|
—
|
—
|
|
|
|
Total
Fees
|
$248,000
|
$202,000
|
The
Audit Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors approved
all fees described above.
Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures.
The
Audit Committee has adopted a policy and procedures for the
pre-approval of audit and non-audit services rendered by our
independent auditor, currently Mayer Hoffman McCann P.C. The policy
generally pre-approves specified services in the defined categories
of audit services, audit-related services, and tax services up to
specified amounts. Pre-approval may also be given as part of the
Audit Committee’s approval of the scope of the engagement of
the independent auditor or on an individual explicit case-by-case
basis before the independent auditor is engaged to provide each
service. The pre-approval of services may be delegated to one or
more of the Audit Committee’s members, but the decision must
be reported to the full Audit Committee at its next scheduled
meeting.
PART
IV
ITEM 15.
|
EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
|
(a)
|
The following documents are filed as part of this Annual
Report:
|
Exhibit No.
|
|
Description
|
|
Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated October 27, 2005 (incorporated
by reference to Annex A to the Company’s Definitive Proxy
Statement on Schedule 14A, filed November 15, 2005).
|
|
|
Certificate of Incorporation (incorporated by reference to Annex B
to the Company’s Definitive Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A,
filed November 15, 2005).
|
|
|
Certificate of Amendment to Certificate of Incorporation
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company's Current
Report on Form 8-K, filed October 14, 2011).
|
|
|
Amended
and Restated Bylaws (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to
the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed February 16,
2017).
|
|
|
Certificate of Designations, Preferences and Rights of the Series E
Convertible Preferred Stock (incorporated by reference to Exhibit
3.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed
February 2, 2015).
|
|
|
Certificate of Designations, Preferences and Rights of the Series F
Convertible Preferred Stock (incorporated by reference to Exhibit
3.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed
September 9, 2016).
|
|
|
Certificate of Designations, Preferences and Rights of the Series G
Convertible Preferred Stock (incorporated by reference to Exhibit
3.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed
December 30, 2016).
|
|
|
Amendment No. 1 to the Certificate of Designations, Preferences and
Rights of the Series E Convertible Preferred Stock (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Company’s Current Report on
Form 8-K, filed December 30, 2016).
|
|
|
Certificate of Designations, Preferences and Rights of the Series A
Convertible Preferred Stock (incorporated by reference to Exhibit
3.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed
September 19, 2017).
|
|
|
Certificate of Elimination of the Series E Convertible Preferred
Stock, Series F Convertible Preferred Stock and Series G
Convertible Preferred Stock (incorporated by reference to Exhibit
3.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed
October 19, 2017).
|
|
|
Certificate
of Amendment to Certificate of Incorporation (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Current Report on
Form 8-K, filed February 13, 2018).
|
|
|
Form of Amendment to Warrant, dated March 21, 2012, (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 4.16 to the Company's Annual Report on Form
10-K, filed April 4, 2012).
|
|
|
Employment Agreement, dated September 27, 2005, between the Company
and S. James Miller (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to
the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed September 30,
2005).
|
|
|
Form of Indemnification Agreement entered into by the Company with
its directors and executive officers (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.4 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form
SB-2 (No. 333-93131), filed December 20, 1999, as
amended).
|
|
|
Amended and Restated 1999 Stock Plan Award (incorporated by
reference to Appendix B of the Company’s Definitive Proxy
Statement on Schedule 14A, filed November 21, 2007).
|
|
|
Form of Stock Option Agreement (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K,
filed July 14, 2005).
|
|
|
2001 Equity Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.2 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB, filed
November 14, 2001).
|
|
|
Securities Purchase Agreement, dated September 25, 2007, by and
between the Company and certain accredited investors (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report
on Form 8-K, filed September 26, 2007).
|
|
Office Space Lease between I.W. Systems Canada Company and GE
Canada Real Estate Equity, dated July 25, 2008 (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.39 to the Company’s Annual Report on
Form 10-K, filed February 24, 2010).
|
|
|
Form of Securities Purchase Agreement, dated August 29, 2008 by and
between the Company and certain accredited investors (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.40 to the Company’s Annual Report
on Form 10-K, filed February 24, 2010).
|
|
|
Change of Control and Severance Benefits Agreement, dated September
27, 2008, between Company and Charles Aubuchon (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.41 to the Company’s Annual Report on
Form 10-K, filed February 24, 2010).
|
|
|
Change of Control and Severance Benefits Agreement, dated September
27, 2008, between Company and David Harding (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.42 to the Company’s Annual Report on
Form 10-K, filed February 24, 2010).
|
|
|
First Amendment to Employment Agreement, dated September 27, 2008,
between the Company and S. James Miller (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.43 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K,
filed February 24, 2010).
|
|
|
Form of Convertible Note dated November 14, 2008 (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.45 to the Company’s Annual Report on
Form 10-K, filed February 24, 2010).
|
|
|
Second Amendment to Employment Agreement, dated April 6, 2009,
between the Company and S. James Miller (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.50 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K,
filed February 24, 2010).
|
|
Office Space Lease between the Company and Allen W. Wooddell, dated
July 25, 2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.54 to the
Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed February 24,
2010).
|
|
|
Third Amendment to Employment Agreement, dated December 10, 2009,
between the Company and S. James Miller (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.60 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K,
filed February 24, 2010).
|
|
|
Securities Purchase Agreement, dated December 12, 2011, by and
between the Company and certain accredited investors (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report
on Form 8-K, filed December 21, 2011).
|
|
|
Note Exchange Agreement, dated December 12, 2011, by and between
the Company and certain accredited investors (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on
Form 8-K, filed December 21, 2011).
|
|
|
Fourth Amendment to Employment Agreement, dated March 10, 2011,
between the Company and S. James Miller, (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.40 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K,
filed January 17, 2012).
|
|
|
Fifth Amendment to Employment Agreement, dated January 31, 2012,
between the Company and S. James Miller, Jr., (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.44 to the Company’s Annual Report on
Form 10-K, filed April 4, 2012.
|
|
|
Employment Agreement, dated January 1, 2013, between the Company
and Wayne Wetherell (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to
the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K, filed March 7,
2013).
|
|
|
Employment Agreement, dated January 1, 2013, between the Company
and David Harding (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the
Company's Current Report on Form 8-K, filed March 7,
2013).
|
|
|
Convertible Promissory Note dated March 27, 2013 issued by the
Company to Neal Goldman (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.41
to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed April 1,
2013).
|
|
|
Amendment to Convertible Promissory Note, dated March 12, 2014
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Current
Report on Form 8-K, filed March 13, 2014).
|
|
|
Note Exchange Agreement, dated January 29, 2015 (incorporated by
reference to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed
February 2, 2015).
|
|
|
Sixth
Amendment to Employment Agreement, by and between S. James Miller
and the Company, dated November 1, 2013 (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K, filed
November 7, 2013).
|
|
|
Seventh Amendment to Employment Agreement, by and between S. James
Miller, Jr. and the Company, dated January 9, 2015 (incorporated by
reference to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed
January 15, 2015).
|
|
|
Second Amendment to Employment Agreement, by and between Wayne
Wetherell and the Company, dated January 9, 2015 (incorporated by
reference to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed
January 15, 2015).
|
|
|
Second
Amendment to Employment Agreement, by and between David E. Harding
and the Company, dated January 9, 2015 (incorporated by reference
to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed January
15, 2015).
|
|
|
Amendment
No. 3 to Convertible Promissory Note, dated December 8, 2014
(incorporated by reference to the Company’s Current Report on
Form 8-K, filed December 10, 2014).
|
|
|
Third
Amendment to Employment Agreement, by and between Wayne Wetherell
and the Company, dated December 14, 2015 (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K, filed
December 21, 2015).
|
|
|
Third
Amendment to Employment Agreement, by and between David E. Harding
and the Company, dated December 14, 2015 (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K, filed
December 21, 2015).
|
|
|
Eighth
Amendment to Employment Agreement, by and between S. James Miller
and the Company, dated December 14, 2015 (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K, filed
December 21, 2015).
|
|
|
Amendment No. 4 to Convertible Promissory Note, dated March 8, 2016
(incorporated by reference to the Company's Current Report on Form
8-K, filed March 10, 2017).
|
|
Convertible Promissory Note, dated March 9, 2016 (incorporated by
reference to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K, filed March
10, 2017).
|
|
|
Form of Securities Purchase Agreement, dated September 7, 2016
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s
Current Report on Form 8-K, filed September 9, 2016).
|
|
|
Amendment No. 5 to Convertible Promissory Note, dated January 23,
2017 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the
Company’s Current Report on Form 10-K, filed January 26,
2017).
|
|
|
Form of Subscription Agreement for Series G Convertible Preferred
Stock (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the
Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed December 30,
2016).
|
|
|
Form of Exchange Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed
December 30, 2016).
|
|
|
Ninth Amendment to Employment Agreement, by and between James
Miller, Jr. and the Company, dated October 20, 2016 (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Current Report
on Form 8-K, filed December 30, 2016).
|
|
|
Fourth
Amendment to Employment Agreement, by and between Wayne Wetherell
and the Company, dated October 20, 2016 (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.4 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K,
filed December 30, 2016).
|
|
|
Fourth Amendment to Employment Agreement, by and between David E.
Harding and the Company, dated October 20, 2016 (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Company’s Current Report on
Form 8-K, dated December 30, 2016).
|
|
|
Amendment No. 2 to Convertible Promissory Note, dated May 10, 2017
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed May 12, 2017).
|
|
|
Amendment No. 6 to Convertible Promissory Note, dated May 10, 2017
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed May 12, 2017).
|
|
|
Form of Subscription Agreement for Series A Convertible Preferred
Stock (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the
Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed September 19,
2017).
|
|
|
Form of Exchange Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed
September 19, 2017).
|
|
|
Fifth Amendment to Employment Agreement, by and between David E.
Harding and the Company, dated February 7, 2018 (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on
Form 8-K, dated February 13, 2018).
|
|
|
Tenth Amendment to Employment Agreement, by and between James
Miller, Jr. and the Company, dated February 8, 2018 (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report
on Form 8-K, dated February 13, 2018).
|
|
|
List of Subsidiaries (incorporated by referenced to Exhibit 21.1 to
the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed February 24,
2010).
|
|
|
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting
Firm.
|
|
|
Certification of CEO as Required by Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14, filed
herewith
|
|
|
Certification of CFO as Required by Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14, filed
herewith.
|
|
|
Certification of CEO and CFO as Required by Rule 13a-14(a) and Rule
15d-14(b) (17 CFR 240.15d-14(b)) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of
Title 18 of the United States Code, filed herewith.
|
|
101.INS
|
|
XBRL Instance Document
|
101.SCH
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema
|
101.CAL
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase
|
101.DEF
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase
|
101.LAB
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase
|
101.PRE
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase
|
SIGNATURES
In
accordance with Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on
its behalf by the undersigned, there unto duly
authorized.
Registrant
Date: March 19, 2018
|
|
ImageWare Systems, Inc.
/s/
S. James Miller, Jr.
|
|
|
S. James Miller, Jr.
|
|
|
Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer),
President
|
Date: March 19, 2018
|
|
/s/
Wayne Wetherell
|
|
|
Wayne Wetherell
|
|
|
Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)
|
In
accordance with the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this Report
has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the
Company and in the capacities and on the dates
indicated.
Date: March 19, 2018
|
|
/s/
S. James Miller, Jr.
|
|
|
S. James Miller, Jr.
|
|
|
Chairman of the Board
|
Date: March 19, 2018
|
|
/s/
David Loesch
|
|
|
David Loesch
|
|
|
Director
|
Date: March 19, 2018
|
|
/s/
Steve Hamm
|
|
|
Steve Hamm
|
|
|
Director
|
|
|
/s/
David Carey
|
Date: March 19, 2018
|
|
David Carey
|
|
|
Director
|
|
|
/s/
John Cronin
|
Date: March 19, 2018
|
|
John Cronin
|
|
|
Director
|
|
|
/s/
Neal Goldman
|
Date: March 19, 2018
|
|
Neal Goldman
|
|
|
Director
|
|
|
/s/
Charles Crocker
|
Date: March 19, 2018
|
|
Charles Crocker
|
|
|
Director
|
|
|
/s/
Dana Kammersgard
|
Date: March 19, 2018
|
|
Dana Kammersgard
|
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/
Robert T. Clutterbuck
|
Date: March 19, 2018
|
|
Robert T. Clutterbuck
|
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/
Charles Frischer
|
Date: March 19, 2018
|
|
Charles Frischer
|
|
|
Director
|
IMAGEWARE SYSTEMS, INC.
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
Page
Number
|
|
|
|
|
F-1
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-4
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-5
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-6
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-7
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-10
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-11
|
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED
PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the
Board of Directors and Shareholders of:
ImageWare Systems, Inc.
Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of
ImageWare Systems, Inc.
(“Company”) as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, and the
related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive
loss, shareholders’ equity (deficit) and cash flows for each
of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2017, and the
related notes (collectively referred to as the “financial
statements”). In our opinion, the financial statements
present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of
the Company as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, and the results of
its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in
the period ended December 31, 2017, in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of
America.
We also
have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public
Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the
Company’s internal control
over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017, based on criteria
established in the 2013 Internal
Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee
of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) and
our report dated March 19, 2018, expressed an unqualified
opinion.
Going Concern Uncertainty
The
accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that
the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note
1 to the financial statements, the Company has incurred recurring
operating losses and is dependent on additional financing to fund
operations. These conditions raise substantial doubt about the
Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.
Management’s plans in regard to these matters are also
described in Note 1 to the financial statements. The financial
statements do not include any adjustments to reflect the possible
future effects on the recoverability and classification of assets
or the amounts and classification of liabilities that may result
from the outcome of this uncertainty.
Basis for Opinion
These
financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the
Company’s financial statements based on our audits. We are a
public accounting firm registered with the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States) ("PCAOB") and are
required to be independent with respect to the Company in
accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable
rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and
the PCAOB.
We
conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB.
Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to
obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements
are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or
fraud.
Our
audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of
material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to
error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those
risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis,
evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial
statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting
principles used and significant estimates made by management, as
well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial
statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis
for our opinion.
/s/
Mayer Hoffman McCann P.C.
We have
served as the Company's auditor since 2011.
San
Diego, California
March 19,
2018
Report of Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm
To the
Board of Directors and Shareholders of:
ImageWare Systems, Inc.
Opinion on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
We have audited ImageWare Systems,
Inc.’s (“Company”) internal control over
financial reporting as of December 31, 2017, based on criteria
established in Internal
Control—Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO criteria). In
our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects,
effective internal control over financial reporting as of December
31, 2017, based on the COSO criteria.
We also
have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public
Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States)
(“PCAOB”), the consolidated balance sheets of the
Company as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, and the related
consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive loss,
shareholders’ equity (deficit) and cash flows for each of the
three years in the period ended December 31, 2017, and our report
dated March 19, 2018, expressed an unqualified opinion on those
financial statements, and included an explanatory paragraph
relating to the uncertainty of the Company’s ability to
continue as a going concern.
Basis for Opinion
The
Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective
internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment
of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting,
included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control
over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express
an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial
reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm
registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with
respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal
securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the
Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We
conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB.
Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to
obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal
control over financial reporting was maintained in all material
respects. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting
included obtaining an understanding of internal control over
financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness
exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating
effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our
audit also included performing such other procedures as we
considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our
audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Definition and Limitations of Internal Control over Financial
Reporting
A
company’s internal control over financial reporting is a
process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America. A
company’s internal control over financial reporting includes
those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance
of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly
reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the
company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are
recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements
in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and
that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only
in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of
the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding
prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or
disposition of the company’s assets that could have a
material effect on the financial statements.
Because
of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial
reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also,
projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods
are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because
of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the
policies or procedures may deteriorate.
/s/
Mayer Hoffman McCann P.C.
San
Diego, California
March 19,
2018
IMAGEWARE SYSTEMS,
INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
|
December 31,
2017
|
December 31,
2016
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
Current
Assets:
|
|
|
Cash
|
$7,317
|
$1,586
|
Accounts
receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $15 and $1 at
December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.
|
458
|
287
|
Inventory,
net
|
79
|
23
|
Other
current assets
|
163
|
135
|
Total
Current Assets
|
8,017
|
2,031
|
|
|
|
Property
and equipment, net
|
43
|
93
|
Other
assets
|
35
|
34
|
Intangible
assets, net of accumulated amortization
|
93
|
106
|
Goodwill
|
3,416
|
3,416
|
Total Assets
|
$11,604
|
$5,680
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
Liabilities:
|
|
|
Accounts
payable
|
$457
|
$425
|
Deferred
revenue
|
1,016
|
1,045
|
Accrued
expenses
|
658
|
945
|
Accrued
interest payable to related parties
|
527
|
102
|
Convertible
lines of credit to related parties, net of discount
|
5,774
|
2,528
|
Total
Current Liabilities
|
8,432
|
5,045
|
|
|
|
Pension
obligation
|
2,024
|
1,895
|
Total
Liabilities
|
10,456
|
6,940
|
|
|
|
Shareholders’
Equity (Deficit):
|
|
|
Preferred
stock, authorized 4,000,000 shares:
|
|
|
Series
A Convertible Redeemable Preferred Stock, $0.01 par value;
designated 31,021 shares, 31,021 shares and 0 shares issued and
outstanding at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively;
liquidation preference $31,021 and $0 at December 31, 2017 and
2016, respectively.
|
|
-
|
Series
B Convertible Redeemable Preferred Stock, $0.01 par value;
designated 750,000 shares, 389,400 shares issued, and 239,400
shares outstanding at December 31, 2017 and 2016; liquidation
preference $620 at December 31, 2017 and 2016.
|
2
|
2
|
Series
E Convertible Redeemable Preferred Stock, $0.01 par value;
designated 12,000 shares, 0 shares and 12,000 shares issued and
outstanding at December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016,
respectively; liquidation preference $0 and $12,000 at December 31,
2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively.
|
-
|
-
|
Series
F Convertible Redeemable Preferred Stock, $0.01 par value;
designated 2,000 shares, 0 shares and 2,000 shares issued and
outstanding at December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016,
respectively; liquidation preference $0 and $2,000 at December 31,
2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively.
|
-
|
-
|
Series
G Convertible Redeemable Preferred Stock, $0.01 par value;
designated 6,120 shares, 0 shares and 6,021 shares issued and
outstanding at December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016,
respectively; liquidation preference $0 and $6,021 at December 31,
2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively.
|
-
|
-
|
Common
Stock, $0.01 par value, 150,000,000 shares authorized; 94,174,540
and 91,853,499 shares issued at December 31, 2017 and 2016,
respectively, and 94,167,836 and 91,846,795 shares outstanding at
December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.
|
941
|
917
|
Additional
paid-in capital
|
172,414
|
156,195
|
Treasury
stock, at cost 6,704 shares
|
(64)
|
(64)
|
Accumulated
other comprehensive loss
|
(1,664)
|
(1,543)
|
Accumulated
deficit
|
(170,481)
|
(156,767)
|
Total
Shareholders’ Equity (Deficit)
|
1,148
|
(1,260)
|
Total Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity
(Deficit)
|
$11,604
|
$5,680
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated
financial statements.
IMAGEWARE SYSTEMS,
INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
||
|
2017
|
2016
|
2015
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
Product
|
$1,614
|
$1,249
|
$2,192
|
Maintenance
|
2,679
|
2,563
|
2,577
|
|
4,293
|
3,812
|
4,769
|
Cost of revenues:
|
|
|
|
Product
|
152
|
243
|
1,117
|
Maintenance
|
839
|
827
|
827
|
Gross
profit
|
3,302
|
2,742
|
2,825
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
General
and administrative
|
4,192
|
3,722
|
3,437
|
Sales
and marketing
|
2,816
|
3,021
|
2,791
|
Research
and development
|
5,953
|
5,332
|
4,643
|
Depreciation
and amortization
|
68
|
129
|
164
|
|
13,029
|
12,204
|
11,035
|
Loss
from operations
|
(9,727)
|
(9,462)
|
(8,210)
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
expense, net
|
591
|
245
|
447
|
Other
income, net
|
(125)
|
(201)
|
(145)
|
Loss
before income taxes
|
(10,193)
|
(9,506)
|
(8,512)
|
|
|
|
|
Income
tax expense (benefit)
|
(124)
|
21
|
22
|
Net
loss
|
$(10,069)
|
$(9,527)
|
$(8,534)
|
Preferred
dividends
|
(2,400)
|
(1,347)
|
(1,065)
|
Preferred
stock exchange
|
(1,245)
|
—
|
—
|
Net
loss available to common shareholders
|
$(13,714)
|
$(10,874)
|
$(9,599)
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted loss per common share — see Note
2:
|
|
|
|
Net
loss
|
$(0.11)
|
$(0.10)
|
$(0.09)
|
Preferred
dividends
|
(0.03)
|
(0.02)
|
(0.01)
|
Preferred
stock exchange
|
(0.01)
|
—
|
—
|
Basic
and diluted loss per share available to common
shareholders
|
$(0.15)
|
$(0.12)
|
$(0.10)
|
Basic
and diluted weighted-average shares outstanding
|
92,816,723
|
94,426,783
|
93,786,079
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated
financial statements.
IMAGEWARE SYSTEMS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE LOSS
(In thousands)
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
||
|
2017
|
2016
|
2015
|
|
|
|
|
Net
loss
|
$(10,069)
|
$(9,527)
|
$(8,534)
|
Other
comprehensive income (loss):
|
|
|
|
Reduction (increase)
in additional minimum pension liability
|
(15)
|
(347)
|
332
|
Foreign
currency translation adjustment
|
(106)
|
(1)
|
67
|
Comprehensive
loss
|
$(10,190)
|
$(9,875)
|
$(8,135)
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated
financial statements.
IMAGEWARE SYSTEMS,
INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
(DEFICIT)
(In thousands, except share amounts)
|
Series A
Convertible,
Redeemable |
Series B
Convertible,
Redeemable
Preferred |
Series E
Convertible,
Preferred |
Series F
Convertible,
Preferred |
Series G
Convertible,
Preferred |
Common
Stock
|
Treasury
Stock
|
Additional Paid-In
|
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
|
Accumulated
|
|
|||||||
|
Shares
|
Amount
|
Shares
|
Amount
|
Shares
|
Amount
|
Shares
|
Amount
|
Shares
|
Amount
|
Shares
|
Amount
|
Shares
|
Amount
|
Capital
|
Loss
|
Deficit
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance
at December 31, 2014
|
-
|
$-
|
239,400
|
$2
|
-
|
$-
|
-
|
$-
|
-
|
$-
|
93,513,854
|
$934
|
(6,704)
|
$(64)
|
$135,982
|
$(1,594)
|
$(136,294)
|
$
(1,034)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance
of Series E Convertible Redeemable Preferred Stock for cash, net of
issuance costs
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
10,022
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
9,955
|
-
|
-
|
9,955
|
Conversion
of related party debt into Series E Convertible Redeemable
Preferred Stock
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
1,978
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
1,978
|
-
|
-
|
1,978
|
Issuance
of Common Stock in payment of Series E Preferred
dividends
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
478,664
|
5
|
-
|
-
|
769
|
-
|
(774)
|
-
|
Issuance
of Common Stock pursuant to cashless warrant exercises
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
45,376
|
1
|
-
|
-
|
(1)
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Issuance
of Common Stock pursuant to option exercises
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
39,705
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
33
|
-
|
-
|
33
|
Recognition
of beneficial conversion feature on convertible debt
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
146
|
-
|
-
|
146
|
Warrants
modified in lieu of cash as compensation
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
80
|
-
|
-
|
80
|
Stock-based
compensation expense
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
960
|
-
|
-
|
960
|
Reduction
in minimum pension liability
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
332
|
-
|
332
|
Foreign
currency translation adjustment
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
67
|
-
|
67
|
Dividends
on preferred stock
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(291)
|
(291)
|
Net
loss
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(8,534)
|
(8,534)
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
|
Series
A
Convertible,
Redeemable |
Series
B
Convertible,
Redeemable
Preferred |
Series
E
Convertible,
Preferred |
Series
F
Convertible,
Preferred |
Series
G
Convertible,
Preferred |
Common
Stock
|
Treasury
Stock
|
Additional
Paid-In
|
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
|
Accumulated
|
|
|||||||
|
Shares
|
Amount
|
Shares
|
Amount
|
Shares
|
Amount
|
Shares
|
Amount
|
Shares
|
Amount
|
Shares
|
Amount
|
Shares
|
Amount
|
Capital
|
Loss
|
Deficit
|
Total
|
Balance at December 31, 2015
|
-
|
$-
|
239,400
|
$2
|
12,000
|
$-
|
-
|
$-
|
-
|
$-
|
94,077,599
|
$940
|
(6,704)
|
$(64)
|
$149,902
|
$(1,195)
|
$(145,893)
|
$3,692
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance
of Series F Convertible Redeemable Preferred Stock for cash, net of
issuance costs
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
2,000
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
1,979
|
-
|
-
|
1,979
|
Issuance
of Series GF Convertible Redeemable Preferred Stock for cash, net
of issuance costs
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
1,625
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
1,614
|
-
|
-
|
1,614
|
Issuance
of Series G Convertible Redeemable Preferred Stock in exchange for
Common Stock
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
4,396
|
-
|
(3,383,830)
|
(34)
|
-
|
-
|
31
|
-
|
-
|
(3)
|
Issuance
of Common Stock pursuant to cashless warrant exercises
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
144,459
|
1
|
-
|
-
|
(1)
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Issuance
of Common Stock pursuant to option exercises
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
12,626
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
3
|
-
|
-
|
3
|
Recognition
of beneficial conversion feature on convertible debt
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
219
|
-
|
-
|
219
|
Stock-based
compensation expense
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
1,162
|
-
|
-
|
1,162
|
Additional
minimum pension liability
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(347)
|
-
|
(347)
|
Foreign
currency translation adjustment
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(1)
|
-
|
(1)
|
Dividends
on preferred stock
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
1,002,645
|
10
|
-
|
-
|
1,286
|
-
|
(1,347)
|
(51)
|
Net
loss
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(9,527)
|
(9,527)
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
IMAGEWARE SYSTEMS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
(DEFICIT)
(In thousands, except share amounts)
(continued)
|
Series
A
Convertible,
Redeemable |
Series
B
Convertible,
Redeemable
Preferred |
Series
E
Convertible,
Preferred |
Series
F
Convertible,
Preferred |
Series
G
Convertible,
Preferred |
Common
Stock
|
Treasury
Stock
|
Additional
Paid-In
|
Accumulated
OtherComprehensive
|
Accumulated
|
|
|||||||
|
Shares
|
Amount
|
Shares
|
Amount
|
Shares
|
Amount
|
Shares
|
Amount
|
Shares
|
Amount
|
Shares
|
Amount
|
Shares
|
Amount
|
Capital
|
Loss
|
Deficit
|
Total
|
Balance
at December 31, 2016
|
-
|
$-
|
239,400
|
$2
|
12,000
|
$-
|
2,000
|
$-
|
6,021
|
$-
|
91,853,499
|
$917
|
(6,704)
|
$(64)
|
$156,195
|
$(1,543)
|
$ (156,767)
|
$(1,260)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance
of Series A Convertible Redeemable Preferred Stock for cash, net of
issuance costs
|
11,000
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
10,937
|
-
|
-
|
10,937
|
Issuance
of Series A Convertible Redeemable Preferred Stock in exchange for
preferred shares
|
20,021
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(12,000)
|
-
|
(2,000)
|
-
|
(6,021)
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
1,245
|
-
|
(1,245)
|
-
|
Issuance
of common stock warrants as compensation
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
57
|
-
|
-
|
57
|
Issuance
of Common Stock pursuant to option exercises
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
369,004
|
4
|
-
|
-
|
255
|
-
|
-
|
259
|
Recognition
of beneficial conversion feature on convertible debt
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
302
|
-
|
-
|
302
|
Stock-based
compensation expense
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
1,094
|
-
|
-
|
1,094
|
Additional
minimum pension liability
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(15)
|
-
|
(15)
|
Foreign
currency translation adjustment
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(106)
|
-
|
(106)
|
Dividends
on preferred stock
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
1,952,037
|
20
|
-
|
-
|
2,329
|
-
|
(2,400)
|
(51)
|
Net
loss
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(10,069)
|
(10,069)
|
Balance
at December 31, 2017
|
31,021
|
$-
|
239,400
|
$2
|
-
|
$-
|
-
|
$-
|
-
|
$-
|
94,174,540
|
$941
|
(6,704)
|
$(64)
|
$172,414
|
$(1,664)
|
$(170,481)
|
$1,148
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
IMAGEWARE SYSTEMS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
||
Cash flows from operating activities
|
2017
|
2016
|
2015
|
Net
loss
|
$(10,069)
|
$(9,527)
|
$(8,534)
|
Adjustments
to reconcile net loss to net cash used by operating
activities:
|
|
|
|
Depreciation
and amortization
|
68
|
129
|
164
|
Amortization
of debt discounts and debt issuance costs
|
209
|
145
|
438
|
Stock-based
compensation
|
1,094
|
1,162
|
960
|
Write
down of capitalized labor inventory to net realizable
value
|
—
|
—
|
281
|
Provision
for losses on accounts receivable
|
15
|
—
|
—
|
Gain
from sale of trademark
|
(50)
|
—
|
—
|
Reduction
in accrued expenses from expiration of statute of
limitations
|
(222)
|
(200)
|
—
|
Warrants
modified/issued in lieu of cash as compensation for
services
|
57
|
—
|
80
|
Change
in assets and liabilities
|
|
|
|
Accounts
receivable
|
(186)
|
62
|
(83)
|
Inventory
|
(56)
|
23
|
589
|
Other
assets
|
(40)
|
(50)
|
17
|
Accounts
payable
|
32
|
227
|
(261)
|
Accrued
expenses
|
359
|
94
|
(76)
|
Deferred
revenue
|
(29)
|
(13)
|
(768)
|
Pension
obligation
|
115
|
37
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
Total
adjustments
|
1,366
|
1,616
|
1,351
|
|
|
|
|
Net
cash used by operating activities
|
(8,703)
|
(7,911)
|
(7,183)
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities
|
|
|
|
Purchase
of property and equipment
|
(5)
|
(49)
|
(87)
|
Proceeds from
sale of trademark
|
50
|
—
|
—
|
Net
cash provided by (used by) investing activities
|
45
|
(49)
|
(87)
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities
|
|
|
|
Proceeds
from line of credit
|
3,350
|
2,650
|
400
|
Proceeds
from exercise of stock options
|
259
|
3
|
33
|
Proceeds
from issuance of preferred stock, net of issuance
costs
|
10,937
|
3,593
|
9,955
|
Dividends
paid to preferred stockholders
|
(51)
|
(51)
|
(51)
|
|
|
|
|
Net
cash provided by financing activities
|
14,495
|
6,195
|
10,337
|
|
|
|
|
Effect
of exchange rate changes on cash
|
(106)
|
(1)
|
67
|
Net
increase (decrease) in cash
|
5,731
|
(1,766)
|
3,134
|
Cash
at beginning of year
|
1,586
|
3,352
|
218
|
Cash
at end of year
|
$7,317
|
$1,586
|
$3,352
|
Supplemental
disclosure of cash flow information:
|
|
|
|
Cash
paid for interest
|
$—
|
$—
|
$1
|
Cash
paid for income taxes
|
$—
|
$—
|
$—
|
Summary
of non-cash investing and financing activities:
|
|
|
|
Conversion
of related party lines of credit balances into Series E
Preferred
|
$—
|
$—
|
$1,978
|
Beneficial
conversion feature of related party lines of credit
|
$302
|
$219
|
$146
|
Accrued
unpaid dividends on Series E Preferred
|
$—
|
$—
|
$240
|
Stock
dividends on Convertible Preferred Stock
|
$2,349
|
$1,296
|
$1,014
|
Issuance
of Common Stock pursuant to cashless warrant exercises
|
$—
|
$1
|
$1
|
Exchange
of Common Stock for Series G Preferred
|
$—
|
$34
|
$—
|
Reduction
(increase) in additional minimum pension
liability
|
$(15)
|
$(347)
|
$332
|
Preferred
stock exchange
|
$1,245
|
$—
|
$—
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated
financial statements.
IMAGEWARE SYSTEMS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 2017, 2016 AND 2015
1. DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS AND OPERATIONS
Overview
As
used in this Annual Report, “we,” “us,”
“our,” “ImageWare,” “ImageWare
Systems,” “Company” or “our Company”
refers to ImageWare Systems, Inc. and all of its subsidiaries.
ImageWare Systems, Inc. is incorporated in the state of Delaware.
The Company is a pioneer and leader in the emerging market for
biometrically enabled software-based identity management solutions.
Using those human characteristics that are unique to us all, the
Company creates software that provides a highly reliable indication
of a person’s identity. The Company’s
“flagship” product is the patented IWS Biometric
Engine®. The Company’s products are used to manage and
issue secure credentials, including national IDs, passports, driver
licenses and access control credentials. The Company’s
products also provide law enforcement with integrated mug shot,
fingerprint LiveScan and investigative capabilities. The Company
also provides comprehensive authentication security software using
biometrics to secure physical and logical access to facilities or
computer networks or internet sites. Biometric technology is now an
integral part of all markets the Company addresses and all of the
products are integrated into the IWS Biometric Engine.
Recent Developments
Creation of Series A
Convertible Preferred Stock
On September 15, 2017, the Company filed the
Certificate of Designations, Preferences, and Rights of the Series
A Convertible Preferred Stock with the Delaware Division of
Corporations, designating 31,021 shares of the Company’s
preferred stock, par value $0.01 per share, as Series A Convertible
Preferred Stock (“Series A
Preferred”). See Note
12, Equity, below, for a description of the Series A
Preferred.
Series A Financing and Preferred Stock Exchange
On September 18, 2017, the Company offered and
sold a total of 11,000 shares of Series A Preferred at a purchase
price of $1,000 per share (the “Series A
Financing”), which amount
includes an aggregate total of 875 shares of Series A Preferred
issuable to Neal Goldman, a member of the Board, and S. James
Miller, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and member of
the Board, in connection with cash advances of $875,000 previously
made to the Company. The net proceeds to the Company from the
Series A Financing were approximately $10.9 million. Concurrently
with the Series A Financing, the Company entered into Exchange
Agreements with holders of all outstanding shares of the
Company’s Series E Convertible Preferred Stock, all
outstanding shares of Series F Convertible Preferred Stock, and all
outstanding shares of Series G Convertible Preferred Stock
(collectively, “Exchanged
Preferred”), pursuant to
which the holders thereof agreed to cancel their Exchanged
Preferred in exchange for the same number of shares of Series A
Preferred (the “Preferred Stock
Exchange”). As a result
of the Preferred Stock Exchange, the Company issued to the holders
of Exchanged Preferred an aggregate total of 20,021 shares of
Series A Preferred.
The
Company evaluated the Preferred Stock Exchange and determined that
the Exchanged Preferred was both an induced conversion and an
extinguishment transaction. Using the guidance in ASC 260-10-S99-2,
Earnings Per Share – SEC Materials – SEC Staff
Announcement: The Effect on the Calculations of Earnings Per Share
for a Period That Includes the Redemption or Induced Conversion of
Preferred Stock and ASC 470-50, Debt – Modifications and
Extinguishments, the Company recorded the fair value differential
of the Exchanged Preferred as adjustments within
Shareholders’ Deficit and in the computation of Net Loss
Available to Common Shareholders in the computation of basic and
diluted loss per share. The Company utilized the services of an
independent third-party valuation firm to perform the computation
of the fair value of the Exchanged Preferred. Based on the fair
value using these methodologies, the Company recorded approximately
$1,245,000 in fair value differential as adjustments within
Shareholders’ Deficit in the Company’s Consolidated
Balance Sheet for the year ended December 31, 2017 and in the
computation of basic and diluted loss per share in the
Company’s Consolidated Statement of Operations for the year
ended December 31, 2017.
As
a result of the Preferred Stock Exchange, on October 19, 2017, the
Company filed Certificates of Elimination with the Delaware
Secretary of State to eliminate the Exchanged
Preferred.
Liquidity, Going Concern and Management’s Plan
Historically, our
principal sources of cash have included customer payments from the
sale of our products, proceeds from the issuance of common and
preferred stock and proceeds from the issuance of debt, including
our Lines of Credit (defined below). Our principal uses of cash
have included cash used in operations, product development and
payments relating to purchases of property and equipment. We expect
that our principal uses of cash in the future will be for product
development including customization of identity management products
for enterprise and consumer applications, further development of
intellectual property, development of Software-as-a-Service
(“SaaS”)
capabilities for existing products as well as general working
capital and capital expenditure requirements. Management expects
that, as our revenues grow, our sales and marketing and research
and development expenses will continue to grow, albeit at a slower
rate and, as a result, we will need to generate significant net
revenues to achieve and sustain income from
operations.
At
December 31, 2017, we had a working capital deficit of
approximately $415,000, compared to a working capital deficit of
approximately $3,014,000 at December 31, 2016. Our principal
sources of liquidity at December 31, 2017 consisted of
approximately $7,317,000 of cash, compared to available borrowings
under our Lines of Credit of $3,350,000, and approximately
$1,586,000 in cash at December 31, 2016.
Considering our projected cash requirements, and
assuming we are unable to generate incremental revenue, our
available cash may be insufficient to satisfy our cash requirements
for the next twelve months from the date of this filing. These
factors raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a
going concern. To address our working capital requirements,
management may seek additional equity and/or debt financing through
the issuance of additional debt and/or equity securities or may
seek strategic or other transactions intended to increase
shareholder value. There are currently no formal committed
financing arrangements to support our projected cash shortfall,
including commitments to purchase additional debt and/or equity
securities, or other agreements, and no assurances can be given
that we will be successful in raising additional debt and/or equity
securities, or entering into any other transaction that addresses
our ability to continue as a going concern.
In
view of the matters described in the preceding paragraph,
recoverability of a major portion of the recorded asset amounts
shown in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet is dependent
upon continued operations of the Company, which, in turn, is
dependent upon the Company’s ability to continue to raise
capital and generate positive cash flows from operations. However,
the Company operates in markets that are emerging and highly
competitive. There is no assurance that the Company will be able to
obtain additional capital, operate at a profit or generate positive
cash flows in the future.
The
consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments
relating to the recoverability and classification of recorded asset
amounts and classifications of liabilities that might be necessary
should the Company be unable to continue as a going
concern.
2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING
POLICIES
Principles of Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include the
accounts of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries. The
Company’s wholly-owned subsidiaries are: XImage Corporation,
a California Corporation; ImageWare Systems ID Group, Inc. a
Delaware corporation (formerly Imaging Technology Corporation);
I.W. Systems Canada Company, a Nova Scotia unlimited liability
company; ImageWare Digital Photography Systems, Inc., LLC a Nevada
limited liability company (formerly Castleworks LLC); Digital
Imaging International GmbH, a company formed under German laws;
and Image Ware Mexico
S de RL de CV, a company formed under Mexican laws.
All significant intercompany
transactions and balances have been eliminated.
Operating Cycle
Assets
and liabilities related to long-term contracts are included in
current assets and current liabilities in the accompanying
consolidated balance sheets, although they will be liquidated in
the normal course of contract completion which may take more than
one operating cycle.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of the consolidated financial
statements in conformity with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America
(“U.S.
GAAP”) requires
management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the
reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of
contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated
financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenue and
expense during the reporting period. Significant estimates include
the allowance for doubtful accounts receivable, inventory carrying
values, deferred tax asset valuation allowances, accounting for
loss contingencies, recoverability of goodwill and acquired
intangible assets and amortization periods, assumptions used in the
Black-Scholes model to calculate the fair value of share based
payments, assumptions used to compute the fair value of the
Exchanged Preferred, revenue and cost of revenues recognized under
the percentage of completion method and assumptions used in the
application of fair value methodologies to calculate the fair value
of pension assets and obligations. Actual results could differ from
estimates.
Accounts Receivable
In
the normal course of business, the Company extends credit without
collateral requirements to its customers that satisfy pre-defined
credit criteria. Accounts receivable are recorded net of an
allowance for doubtful accounts. Accounts receivable are considered
delinquent when the due date on the invoice has passed. The Company
records its allowance for doubtful accounts based upon its
assessment of various factors. The Company considers historical
experience, the age of the accounts receivable balances, the credit
quality of its customers, current economic conditions and other
factors that may affect customers’ ability to pay to
determine the level of allowance required. Accounts
receivable are written off against the allowance for doubtful
accounts when all collection efforts by the Company have been
unsuccessful.
Inventories
Finished
goods inventories are stated at the lower of cost, determined using
the average cost method, or net realizable value. See Note
6.
Property, Equipment and Leasehold Improvements
Property
and equipment, consisting of furniture and equipment, are stated at
cost and are being depreciated on a straight-line basis over the
estimated useful lives of the assets, which generally range from
three to five years. Maintenance and repairs are charged to expense
as incurred. Major renewals or improvements are capitalized. When
assets are sold or abandoned, the cost and related accumulated
depreciation are removed from the accounts and the resulting gain
or loss is recognized. Expenditures for leasehold improvements are
capitalized. Amortization of leasehold improvements is computed
using the straight-line method over the shorter of the remaining
lease term or the estimated useful lives of the
improvements.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
For
certain of the Company’s financial instruments, including
accounts receivable, accounts payable, accrued expenses, deferred
revenues and lines of credit payable to related parties, the
carrying amounts approximate fair value due to their relatively
short maturities.
Revenue Recognition
The
Company recognizes revenue from the following major revenue
sources:
●
Long-term fixed-price contracts involving significant
customization;
●
Fixed-price contracts involving minimal customization;
●
Software licensing;
●
Sales of computer hardware and identification media;
and
●
Post-contract customer support
(“PCS”).
The Company’s revenue recognition policies
are consistent with U.S. GAAP including the Financial Accounting
Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification
(“ASC”) 985-605, “Software Revenue
Recognition,” ASC 605-35
“Revenue Recognition,
Construction-Type and Production-Type Contracts,” “Securities and Exchange
Commission Staff Accounting Bulletin 104,” and ASC 605-25 “Revenue Recognition, Multiple
Element Arrangements.”
Accordingly, the Company recognizes revenue when all of the
following criteria are met: persuasive evidence of an arrangement
exists, delivery has occurred or services have been rendered, the
fee is fixed or determinable, and collectability is reasonably
assured.
The Company recognizes revenue and profit as work
progresses on long-term, fixed-price contracts involving
significant amount of hardware and software customization using the
percentage of completion method based on costs incurred to date
compared to total estimated costs at completion. The primary
components of costs incurred are third party software and direct
labor cost including fringe benefits. Revenues recognized in excess
of amounts billed are classified as current assets under
“Costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings on
uncompleted contracts.” Amounts billed to customers in excess
of revenues recognized are classified as current liabilities under
“Billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings on
uncompleted contracts.” Revenue from contracts for which the
Company cannot reliably estimate total costs or there are not
significant amounts of customization are recognized upon
completion. For contracts that require significant amounts of
customization that the Company accounts for under the completed
contract method of revenue recognition, the Company defers revenue
recognition until customer acceptance is received. For contracts
containing either extended or dependent payment terms, revenue
recognition is deferred until such time as payment has been
received by the Company. The Company also generates non-recurring
revenue from the licensing of its software. Software license
revenue is recognized upon the execution of a license agreement,
upon deliverance, when fees are fixed and determinable, when
collectability is probable, when all other significant obligations
have been fulfilled and the Company has
obtained vendor specific objective evidence
(“VSOE”) of the fair
value of the undelivered element. VSOE of fair value for customer
support services is determined by reference to the price the
customer pays for such element when sold separately; that is, the
renewal rate offered to customers. In those instances when
objective and reliable evidence of fair value exists for the
undelivered items but not for the delivered items, the residual
method is used to allocate the arrangement consideration. Under the
residual method, the amount of arrangement consideration allocated
to the delivered items equals the total arrangement consideration
less the aggregate fair value of the undelivered
items. The Company also
generates revenue from the sale of computer hardware and
identification media. Revenue for these items is recognized upon
delivery of these products to the customer. The Company’s
revenue from periodic maintenance agreements is generally
recognized ratably over the respective maintenance periods provided
no significant obligations remain and collectability of the related
receivable is probable. Pricing of maintenance contracts is
consistent period to period and calculated as a percentage of the
software or hardware revenue. Amounts collected in advance for
maintenance services are included in current liabilities under
“Deferred revenue.” Sales tax collected from customers
is excluded from revenue.
Goodwill
The Company accounts for its intangible assets
under the provisions of ASC 350, “Intangibles - Goodwill and
Other.” In accordance
with ASC 350, intangible assets with a definite life are analyzed
for impairment under ASC 360-10-05 “Property, Plant and
Equipment” and intangible
assets with an indefinite life are analyzed for impairment under
ASC 360 annually, or more often if circumstances dictate. The
Company performs its annual goodwill impairment test in the fourth
quarter of each year, or if required, at the end of each fiscal
quarter. In accordance with ASC 350, goodwill, or the
excess of cost over fair value of net assets acquired is tested for
impairment using a fair value approach at the “reporting
unit” level. A reporting unit is the operating segment, or a
business one level below that operating segment (referred to as a
component) if discrete financial information is prepared and
regularly reviewed by management at the component level. The
Company’s reporting unit is at the entity level. The Company
recognizes an impairment charge for any amount by which the
carrying amount of a reporting unit’s goodwill exceeds its
fair value. The Company uses fair value methodologies to establish
fair values.
The
Company did not record any goodwill impairment charges for the
years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 or 2015.
Intangible and Long-Lived Assets
Intangible
assets are carried at their cost less any accumulated
amortization. Any costs incurred to renew or extend the
life of an intangible or long-lived asset are reviewed for
capitalization. The Company evaluates long-lived assets for
impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate
their net book value may not be recoverable. When such factors and
circumstances exist, the Company compares the projected
undiscounted future cash flows associated with the related asset or
group of assets over their estimated useful lives against their
respective carrying amount. Impairment, if any, is based on the
excess of the carrying amount over the fair value, based on market
value when available, or discounted expected cash flows, of those
assets and is recorded in the period in which the determination is
made. The Company’s management currently believes there is no
impairment of its long-lived assets. There can be no assurance,
however, that market conditions will not change or demand for the
Company’s products under development will continue. Either of
these could result in future impairment of long-lived
assets.
Concentration of Credit Risk
Financial
instruments which potentially subject the Company to concentrations
of credit risk consist principally of cash and trade accounts
receivable. The Company places its cash with high quality financial
institutions and at times during the years ended December 31, 2017
and 2016 exceeded the FDIC insurance limits of $250,000. Sales are
typically made on credit and the Company generally does not require
collateral. The Company performs ongoing credit evaluations of its
customers’ financial condition and maintains an allowance for
doubtful accounts. The Company considers historical experience, the
age of the accounts receivable balances, the credit quality of its
customers, current economic conditions and other factors that may
affect customers’ ability to pay to determine the level of
allowance required. Accounts receivable are presented net of an
allowance for doubtful accounts of approximately $15,000 and $1,000
at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.
For
the year ended December 31, 2017 one customer accounted for
approximately 25% or $1,089,000 of total revenues and had trade
receivables of approximately $201,000 as of the end of the
year. For the year ended December 31, 2016 two customers
accounted for approximately 30% or $1,162,000 of total revenues and
had trade receivables of $78,000 as of the end of the year. For the
year ended December 31, 2015, two customers accounted for
approximately 37% or $1,753,000 of total revenues and $78,000 trade
receivables as of the end of the year.
Stock-Based Compensation
At
December 31, 2017, the Company had one stock-based compensation
plan for employees and nonemployee directors, which authorize the
granting of various equity-based incentives including stock options
and restricted stock.
The Company estimates the fair value of its stock
options using a Black-Scholes option-pricing model, consistent with
the provisions of ASC 718, “Compensation – Stock
Compensation.” The fair
value of stock options granted is recognized to expense over the
requisite service period. Stock-based compensation expense for all
share-based payment awards is recognized using the straight-line
single-option method. Stock-based compensation expense is reported
in operating expenses based upon the departments to which
substantially all of the associated employees report and credited
to additional paid-in-capital. Stock-based compensation expense
related to equity options was approximately $1,094,000, $1,162,000
and $744,000 for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015,
respectively.
ASC
718 requires the use of a valuation model to calculate the fair
value of stock-based awards. The Company has elected to use the
Black-Scholes option-pricing model, which incorporates various
assumptions including volatility, expected life, and interest
rates. The Company is required to make various assumptions in the
application of the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The Company
has determined that the best measure of expected volatility is
based on the historical weekly volatility of the Company’s
Common Stock. Historical volatility factors utilized in the
Company’s Black-Scholes computations for options granted
during the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 ranged from
58% to 103%. The Company has elected to estimate the expected life
of an award based upon the SEC approved “simplified
method” noted under the provisions of Staff Accounting
Bulletin No. 110. The expected term used by the Company during the
years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 was 5.17 years. The
difference between the actual historical expected life and the
simplified method was immaterial. The interest rate used is the
risk-free interest rate and is based upon U.S. Treasury rates
appropriate for the expected term. Interest rates used in the
Company’s Black-Scholes calculations for the years ended
December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 averaged 2.6%. Dividend yield is
zero as the Company does not expect to declare any dividends on the
Company’s common shares in the foreseeable
future.
In
addition to the key assumptions used in the Black-Scholes model,
the estimated forfeiture rate at the time of valuation is a
critical assumption. The Company has adopted the provisions of ASU
2016-09 and will continue to use an estimated annualized forfeiture
rate of approximately 0% for corporate officers, 4.1% for members
of the Board of Directors and 6.0% for all other employees. The
Company reviews the expected forfeiture rate annually to determine
if that percent is still reasonable based on historical
experience.
Restricted
stock units are recorded at the grant date fair value with
corresponding compensation expense recorded ratably over the
requisite service period.
Income Taxes
Current
income tax expense or benefit is the amount of income taxes
expected to be payable or refundable for the current year. A
deferred income tax asset or liability is computed for the expected
future impact of differences between the financial reporting and
tax bases of assets and liabilities and for the expected future tax
benefit to be derived from tax credits and loss carryforwards.
Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance when, in
the opinion of management, it is more likely than not that some
portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be
realized.
Foreign Currency Translation
The
financial position and results of operations of the Company’s
foreign subsidiaries are measured using the foreign
subsidiary’s local currency as the functional currency.
Revenues and expenses of such subsidiaries have been translated
into U.S. dollars at weighted-average exchange rates
prevailing during the period. Assets and liabilities have been
translated at the rates of exchange on the balance sheet date. The
resulting translation gain and loss adjustments are recorded
directly as a separate component of shareholders’ equity,
unless there is a sale or complete liquidation of the underlying
foreign investments. The Company translates foreign currencies of
its German, Canadian and Mexican subsidiaries. The cumulative
translation adjustment, which is recorded in accumulated other
comprehensive loss, decreased approximately $106,000 for the year
ended December 31, 2017, decreased approximately $1,000 for the
year ended December 31, 2016 and increased approximately $67,000
for the year ended December 31, 2015.
Comprehensive Loss
Comprehensive loss consists of net gains and
losses affecting shareholders’ equity that, under generally
accepted accounting principles, are excluded from net loss. For the
Company, the only items are the cumulative translation adjustment
and the additional minimum liability related to the Company’s
defined benefit pension plan, recognized pursuant to ASC 715-30,
“Compensation - Retirement
Benefits - Defined Benefit Plans – Pension.”
Advertising Costs
The
Company expenses advertising costs as incurred. The Company
incurred approximately $45,000 in advertising expenses during the
year ended December 31, 2017, $24,000 in advertising expenses
during the year ended December 31, 2016, and $12,000 during the
year ended December 31, 2015.
Loss Per Share
Basic
loss per common share is calculated by dividing net loss available
to common shareholders for the period by the weighted-average
number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted loss
per common share is calculated by dividing net loss available to
common shareholders for the period by the weighted-average number
of common shares outstanding during the period, adjusted to
include, if dilutive, potential dilutive shares consisting of
convertible preferred stock, convertible notes payable, stock
options and warrants, calculated using the treasury stock and
if-converted methods. For diluted loss per share
calculation purposes, the net loss available to common shareholders
is adjusted to add back any preferred stock dividends in the
consolidated statement of operations for the respective
periods.
(Amounts in thousands, except share and per share
amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
||
Numerator
for basic and diluted loss per share:
|
2017
|
2016
|
2015
|
Net
loss
|
$(10,069)
|
$(9,527)
|
$(8,534)
|
Preferred
dividends
|
(2,400)
|
(1,347)
|
(1,065)
|
Preferred
stock exchange
|
(1,245)
|
—
|
—
|
Net
loss available to common shareholders
|
$(13,714)
|
$(10,874)
|
$(9,599)
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator
for basic loss per share — weighted-average shares
outstanding
|
92,816,723
|
94,426,783
|
93,786,079
|
Effect
of dilutive securities
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
Denominator
for diluted loss per share — weighted-average shares
outstanding
|
92,816,723
|
94,426,783
|
93,786,079
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted loss per share:
|
|
|
|
Net
loss
|
$(0.11)
|
$(0.10)
|
$(0.09)
|
Preferred
dividends
|
(0.03)
|
(0.02)
|
(0.01)
|
Preferred
stock exchange
|
(0.01)
|
—
|
—
|
Net
loss available to common shareholders
|
$(0.15)
|
$(0.12)
|
$(0.10)
|
The
following potential dilutive securities have been excluded from the
computations of diluted weighted-average shares outstanding as
their effect would have been antidilutive:
Potential Dilutive Securities:
|
Common Share Equivalents at December 31, 2017
|
Common Share Equivalents at December 31, 2016
|
Common Share Equivalents at December 31, 2015
|
Convertible
lines of credit
|
5,221,964
|
2,201,903
|
—
|
Convertible
redeemable preferred stock – Series A
|
26,974,783
|
—
|
—
|
Convertible
redeemable preferred stock – Series B
|
46,029
|
46,029
|
46,029
|
Convertible
redeemable preferred stock – Series E
|
—
|
6,315,789
|
6,442,105
|
Convertible
redeemable preferred stock – Series F
|
—
|
1,333,333
|
—
|
Convertible
redeemable preferred stock – Series G
|
—
|
4,014,000
|
—
|
Stock
options
|
6,093,512
|
6,506,843
|
5,376,969
|
Warrants
|
230,000
|
175,000
|
450,000
|
Total
Potential Dilutive Securities
|
38,566,288
|
20,592,897
|
12,315,103
|
Recently Issued Accounting Standards
From time to time, new accounting pronouncements
are issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the
“FASB”), or other standard setting bodies, which
are adopted by us as of the specified effective date. Unless
otherwise discussed, the Company’s management believes the
impact of recently issued standards not yet effective will not have
a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial
statements upon adoption.
FASB ASU No. 2014-09.
In May 2014, FASB issued Accounting
Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with
Customers, which requires an
entity to recognize the amount of revenue to which it expects to be
entitled for the transfer of promised goods or services to
customers. ASU No. 2014-09 will replace most existing revenue
recognition guidance in U.S. GAAP when it becomes effective. In
July 2015, the FASB finalized a one-year deferral of the effective
date of the new standard. For public entities, the deferral results
in the new revenue standard being effective for fiscal years, and
interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December
15, 2017. The core principle of the new guidance is that an entity
should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods
or services to customers in an amount that reflects the
consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in
exchange for those goods or services. Calendar year-end public
companies are therefore required to apply the revenue guidance
beginning in their 2018 interim and annual financial statements.
The standard permits the use of either the retrospective or
modified retrospective transition method. We have adopted this
standard using the modified retrospective transition method during
the first fiscal quarter in 2018.
In
preparation for adoption of the standard, we have analyzed each of
our revenue streams:
●
Long-term fixed-price contracts involving significant
customization;
●
Fixed-price contracts involving minimal customization;
●
Software licensing;
●
Sales of computer hardware and identification media;
and
●
Post-contract customer support
(“PCS”).
Analysis
of the above revenue streams in preparation for the adoption of the
standard resulted in the identification of one of our revenue
contracts requiring the customer to make a fixed payment for a
one-year minimum royalty. Under current GAAP, we recognized the
royalty revenue over the one year. Under the new standard, we will
recognize the minimum royalty fee upon contract
renewal.
Revenue
recognition related to our other arrangements for software
licenses, hardware and identification media, professional services
and maintenance will remain substantially unchanged.
The
Company is still evaluating the effect the standard will have on
its financial statement disclosures.
FASB ASU No.
2016-01. In January 2016, the
FASB issued ASU 2016-01, “Financial
Instruments—Overall – Recognition and Measurement of
Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities.”
The amendments in this ASU address
certain aspects of recognition, measurement, presentation, and
disclosure of financial instruments and apply to all entities that
hold financial assets or owe financial liabilities. The amendments
in this ASU also simplify the impairment assessment of equity
investments without readily determinable fair values by requiring
assessment for impairment qualitatively at each reporting period.
That impairment assessment is similar to the qualitative assessment
for long-lived assets, goodwill, and indefinite-lived intangible
assets. This ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after
December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those fiscal
years, with earlier application permitted for financial statements
that have not been issued. An entity should apply the amendments by
means of a cumulative-effect adjustment to the balance sheet as of
the beginning of the fiscal year of adoption. We have adopted the
provisions of this ASU for our fiscal year beginning January 1,
2018 and the adoption of this standard did not have a significant
impact on our consolidated financial statements.
FASB ASU No.
2016-02. In February 2016, the
FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, “Leases.” This guidance will result in key changes to lease
accounting and will aim to bring leases onto balance sheets to give
investors, lenders, and other financial statement users a more
comprehensive view of a company's long-term financial obligations
as well as the assets it owns versus leases. The new leasing
standard will be effective for fiscal years beginning after
December 15, 2018, and for interim periods within those fiscal
years. The Company is currently evaluating the impact this guidance
will have on our consolidated financial statements and anticipates
commencement of adoption planning in the fourth fiscal quarter of
2018.
FASB ASU No.
2016-08. In March 2016, the
FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No.
2016-08, Revenue from Contracts with
Customers (Topic 606): Principal versus Agent Considerations
(Reporting Revenue Gross versus Net) (“ASU 2016-08”). ASU 2016-08 clarifies
the implementation guidance on principal versus agent
considerations. The guidance includes indicators to assist an
entity in determining whether it controls a specified good or
service before it is transferred to the customers. This guidance is
effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017
including interim periods within those fiscal years. We have
adopted the provisions this ASU in conjunction with our adoption of
ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with
Customers.
FASB ASU No.
2016-10. In April 2016, the
FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No.
2016-10, Revenue from Contracts with
Customers (Topic 606): Identifying Performance Obligations and
Licensing (“ASU
2016-10”). ASU 2016-10 provides further implementation
guidance on identifying performance obligations and also improves
the operability and understandability of the licensing
implementation guidance. This guidance is effective for fiscal
years beginning after December 15, 2017 including interim periods
within those fiscal years. We have adopted the provisions this ASU
in conjunction with our adoption of ASU 2014-09,
Revenue from
Contracts with Customers.
FASB ASU No.
2016-13. In June 2016, the FASB
issued Accounting Standard Update No. 2016-13, Financial
Instruments—Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit
Losses on Financial Instruments. ASU No. 2016-13 changes the impairment model
for most financial assets and certain other instruments. For trade
and other receivables, held-to-maturity debt securities, loans and
other instruments, entities will be required to use a new
forward-looking “expected loss” model that will replace
today’s “incurred loss” model and generally will
result in the earlier recognition of allowances for losses. For
available-for-sale debt securities with unrealized losses, entities
will measure credit losses in a manner similar to current practice,
except that the losses will be recognized as an allowance. This
guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15,
2019 including interim periods within those fiscal years. The
Company is currently evaluating the potential impact of adoption of
this standard on its consolidated financial
statements.
FASB ASU No.
2016-15. In August 2016, the
FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No.
2016-15, Statement
of Cash Flows (Topic 230) Classification
of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash
Payments. ASU
2016-15 eliminates the diversity in practice related to the
classification of certain cash receipts and payments for debt
prepayment or extinguishment costs, the maturing of a zero-coupon
bond, the settlement of contingent liabilities arising from a
business combination, proceeds from insurance settlements,
distributions from certain equity method investees and beneficial
interests obtained in a financial asset securitization. ASU 2016-15
designates the appropriate cash flow classification, including
requirements to allocate certain components of these cash receipts
and payments among operating, investing and financing
activities. This guidance
is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017
including interim periods within those fiscal years.
The
retrospective transition method, requiring adjustment to all
comparative periods presented, is required unless it is
impracticable for some of the amendments, in which case those
amendments would be prospectively as of the earliest date
practicable. We have adopted
the provisions of this ASU for our fiscal year beginning January 1,
2018 and the adoption of this standard did not have a significant
impact on our consolidated financial
statements.
FASB ASU No. 2017-04.
In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU
No. 2017-04, Intangibles – Goodwill
and Other (Topic 350): Simplifying the Test for Goodwill
Impairment. The amendments of this
ASU eliminate step 2 from the goodwill impairment test. The annual,
or interim test is performed by comparing the fair value of a
reporting unit with its carrying amount. The amendments of this ASU
also eliminate the requirements for any reporting unit with a zero
or negative carrying amount to perform a qualitative assessment and
if it fails that qualitative test, to perform step 2 of the
goodwill impairment test. ASU No. 2017-04 is effective for fiscal
years beginning after December 15, 2019. The Company is currently evaluating the potential
impact of adoption of this standard on its consolidated financial
statements.
FASB ASU No.
2017-09. In May 2017,
the FASB issued ASU
No. 2017-09, “Scope
of Modification Accounting,” to reduce
diversity in practice and provide clarity regarding existing
guidance in ASC 718, “Stock
Compensation.” The amendments
in this updated guidance clarify that an entity should apply
modification accounting in response to a change in the terms and
conditions of an entity’s share-based payment awards unless
three newly specified criteria are met. This guidance is effective
for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including
interim periods within that reporting
period. We have adopted
the provisions of this ASU for our fiscal year beginning January 1,
2018 and the adoption of this standard did not have a significant
impact on our consolidated financial
statements.
FASB ASU No. 2017-11.
In July 2017, the FASB issued ASU No
2017-11, “Earnings Per Share (Topic
260); Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity (Topic 480);
Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): (Part I) Accounting for
Certain Financial Instruments with Down Round Features, (Part II)
Replacement of the Indefinite Deferral.” The ASU applies to issuers of financial
instruments with down-round features. It amends (1) the
classification of such instruments as liabilities or equity by
revising the guidance in ASC 815 on the evaluation of whether
instruments or embedded features with down-round provisions must be
accounted for as derivative instruments and (2) the guidance on
recognition and measurement of the value transferred upon the
trigger of a down-round feature for equity-classified instruments
by revising ASC 260. The ASU is effective for public business
entities for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal
years, beginning after December 15, 2018. For all other
organizations, the amendments are effective for fiscal years
beginning after December 15, 2019, and interim periods within
fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2020. Early adoption is
permitted. The Company is
currently evaluating the potential impact of this updated guidance
on its consolidated financial
statements.
3. FAIR VALUE ACCOUNTING
The Company accounts for fair value measurements
in accordance with ASC 820, “Fair Value Measurements and
Disclosures,” which
defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair
value in generally accepted accounting principles, and expands
disclosures about fair value measurements.
ASC
820 establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs
to valuation techniques used to measure fair value. The hierarchy
gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active
markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1 measurements)
and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3
measurements). The three levels of the fair value hierarchy under
ASC 820 are described below:
|
Level 1
|
Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at
the measurement date for identical, unrestricted assets or
liabilities.
|
|
|
|
|
Level 2
|
Applies to assets or liabilities for which there are inputs other
than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for
the asset or liability such as quoted prices for similar assets or
liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical assets
or liabilities in markets with insufficient volume or infrequent
transactions (less active markets); or model-derived valuations in
which significant inputs are observable or can be derived
principally from, or corroborated by, observable market
data.
|
|
|
|
|
Level 3
|
Prices or valuation techniques that require inputs that are both
significant to the fair value measurement and unobservable
(supported by little or no market activity).
|
The
following table sets forth the Company’s financial assets and
liabilities measured at fair value by level within the fair value
hierarchy. As required by ASC 820, assets and liabilities are
classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of input
that is significant to the fair value measurement.
|
Fair Value at December 31, 2017
|
|||
($ in thousands)
|
Total
|
Level 1
|
Level 2
|
Level 3
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
Pension
assets
|
$1,806
|
$1,806
|
$—
|
$—
|
Totals
|
$1,806
|
$1,806
|
$—
|
$—
|
|
Fair Value at December 31, 2016
|
|||
($ in thousands)
|
Total
|
Level 1
|
Level 2
|
Level 3
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
Pension
assets
|
$1,645
|
$1,645
|
$—
|
$—
|
Totals
|
$1,645
|
$1,645
|
$—
|
$—
|
The
Company’s pension assets are classified within Level 1 of the
fair value hierarchy because they are valued using market prices.
The pension assets are primarily comprised of the cash surrender
value of insurance contracts. All plan assets are managed in a
policyholder pool in Germany by outside investment managers. The
investment objectives for the plan are the preservation of capital,
current income and long-term growth of capital.
The Company monitors the activity within each level and any changes
with the underlying valuation techniques or inputs utilized to
recognize if any transfers between levels are
necessary. That determination is made, in part, by
working with outside valuation experts for Level 3 instruments and
monitoring market related data and other valuation inputs for Level
1 and Level 2 instruments.
4. INTANGIBLE ASSETS AND GOODWILL
The Company has intangible assets in the form of
trademarks, trade names and patents. The carrying amount of the
Company’s trademarks and trade names was $0 as of December
31, 2017 and 2016, respectively, which include accumulated
amortization of $347,000 as of December 31, 2017 and 2016.
Amortization expense related to trademarks and tradenames was $0,
$0 and $15,000 for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and
2015, respectively. All intangible assets are amortized over their
estimated useful lives with no estimated residual values. Any costs
incurred by the Company to renew or extend the life of intangible
assets will be evaluated under ASC No. 350, Intangibles – Goodwill
and Other, for proper
treatment.
The
carrying amounts of the Company’s patent intangible assets
were $93,000 and $105,000 as of December 31, 2017 and 2016,
respectively, which includes accumulated amortization of $566,000
and $554,000 as of December 31, 2017 and 2016,
respectively. Amortization expense for patent intangible
assets was $12,000 for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and
2015. Patent intangible assets are being amortized on a
straight-line basis over their remaining life of approximately 8.5
years. There was no impairment of the Company’s intangible
assets during the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and
2015.
The
Company annually, or more frequently if events or circumstances
indicate a need, tests the carrying amount of goodwill for
impairment. The Company performs its annual impairment test in the
fourth quarter of each year. A two-step impairment test is used to
first identify potential goodwill impairment and then measure the
amount of goodwill impairment loss, if any. The first step was
conducted by determining and comparing the fair value, employing
the market approach, of the Company’s reporting unit to the
carrying value of the reporting unit. The Company continues to have
only one reporting unit, Identity Management. Based on the results
of this impairment test, the Company determined that its goodwill
was not impaired during the years ended December 31,
2017, 2016 and 2015.
The
estimated acquired intangible amortization expense for the next
five fiscal years is as follows:
Fiscal Year Ended December 31,
|
Estimated Amortization
Expense
($ in thousands)
|
2018
|
$12
|
2019
|
12
|
2020
|
12
|
2021
|
12
|
2022
|
12
|
Thereafter
|
33
|
Totals
|
$93
|
5. RELATED PARTIES
Lines of Credit with Related Parties
In March 2013, the Company and Neal Goldman, a
member of the Company’s Board of Directors
(“Goldman”), entered into a line of credit (the
“Goldman Line of
Credit”) with available
borrowings of up to $2.5 million. In March 2014, the Goldman Line
of Credit’s borrowing was increased to an aggregate total of
$3.5 million (the “Amendment”). Pursuant to the terms and conditions of
the Amendment, Goldman had the right to convert up to $2.5 million
of the outstanding balance of the Goldman Line of Credit into
shares of the Company’s Common Stock for $0.95 per share. Any
remaining outstanding balance was convertible into shares of
the Company’s Common Stock for $2.25 per
share.
As consideration for the initial Goldman Line of
Credit, the Company issued a warrant to Goldman, exercisable for
1,052,632 shares of the Company’s Common Stock (the
“Line
of Credit Warrant”). The
Goldman Line of Credit Warrant had a term of two years from the
date of issuance and an exercise price of $0.95 per
share. As consideration for entering into the Amendment,
the Company issued to Goldman a second warrant, exercisable for
177,778 shares of the Company’s Common Stock (the
“Amendment
Warrant”). The Amendment
Warrant expired on March 27, 2015 and had an exercise price of
$2.25 per share.
The
Company estimated the fair value of the Line of Credit Warrant
using the Black-Scholes option pricing model using the following
assumptions: term of two years, a risk-free interest rate of 2.58%,
a dividend yield of 0%, and volatility of 79%. The Company recorded
the fair value of the Line of Credit Warrant as a deferred
financing fee of approximately $580,000 to be amortized over the
life of the Goldman Line of Credit. The Company estimated the fair
value of the Amendment Warrant using the Black-Scholes option
pricing model using the following assumptions: term on one year, a
risk-free interest rate of 2.58%, a dividend yield of 0% and
volatility of 74%. The Company recorded the fair value of the
Amendment Warrant as an additional deferred financing fee of
approximately $127,000 to be amortized over the life of the Goldman
Line of Credit.
During
the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company recorded an
aggregate of approximately $11,000 and $48,000, respectively in
deferred financing fee amortization expense which is recorded as a
component of interest expense in the Company’s consolidated
statements of operations.
In April 2014, the Company and Goldman entered
into a further amendment to the Goldman Line of Credit to decrease
the available borrowings to $3.0 million (the
“Second
Amendment”). Contemporaneous with the execution
of the Second Amendment, the Company entered into a new unsecured
line of credit with Charles Crocker, a member of the
Company’s Board of Directors (“Crocker”), with available borrowings of up to
$500,000 (the “Crocker LOC”), which amount was convertible into
shares of the Company’s Common Stock for $2.25 per share. As
a result of these amendments, total available borrowings under the
Lines of Credit available to the Company remained unchanged at a
total of $3.5 million. In connection with the Second Amendment,
Goldman assigned and transferred to Crocker one-half of the
Amendment Warrant.
In December 2014, the Company and Goldman entered
into a further amendment to the Goldman Line of Credit to increase
the available borrowing to $5.0 million and extend the maturity
date of the Goldman Line of Credit to March 27, 2017 (the
“Third
Amendment”). Also, as a
result of the Third Amendment, Goldman had the right to convert up
to $2.5 million outstanding principal, plus any accrued but unpaid
interest (“Outstanding
Balance”) into shares of
the Company’s Common Stock for $0.95 per share, the next
$500,000 Outstanding Balance into shares of Common Stock for $2.25
per share and any remaining outstanding balance thereafter into
shares of Common Stock for $2.30 per share. The Third Amendment
also modified the definition of a “Qualified Financing”
to mean a debt or equity financing resulting in gross proceeds to
the Company of at least $5.0 million.
In
February 2015, as a result of the Series E Financing, the Company
issued 1,978 shares of Series E Preferred to Goldman to satisfy
$1,950,000 in principal borrowings under the Goldman Line of Credit
plus approximately $28,000 in accrued interest. As a result of the
Series E Financing, the Company’s borrowing capacity under
the Goldman Line of Credit was reduced to $3,050,000 with the
maturity date unchanged and the Crocker LOC was terminated in
accordance with its terms.
In March 2016, the Company and Goldman entered
into a fourth amendment to the Goldman Line of Credit (the
“Fourth
Amendment”) solely to (i)
increase available borrowings to $5.0 million; (ii) extend the
maturity date to June 30, 2017, and (iii) provide for the
conversion of the outstanding balance due under the terms of the
Goldman Line of Credit into that number of fully paid and
non-assessable shares of the Company’s Common Stock as is
equal to the quotient obtained by dividing the outstanding balance
by $1.25.
Contemporaneous with the execution of the Fourth
Amendment, the Company entered into a new $500,000 Line of Credit
(the “New Crocker
LOC”) with available
borrowings of up to $500,000 with Crocker, which replaced the
original Crocker LOC that terminated as a result of the
consummation of the Series E Financing. Similar to the
Fourth Amendment, the New Crocker LOC with Crocker originally
matured on June 30, 2017, and provides for the conversion of
the outstanding balance due under the terms of the New Crocker LOC
into that number of fully paid and non-assessable shares of the
Company’s Common Stock as is equal to the quotient obtained
by dividing the outstanding balance by $1.25.
On
December 27, 2016, in connection with the consummation of the
Series G Financing, the Company and Holder agreed to enter
into the
Fifth Amendment (the “Line
of Credit Amendment”) to the Goldman
Line of Credit to provide the Company with the ability to borrow up
to $5.5 million under the terms of the Goldman Line of Credit. In
addition, the Maturity Date, as defined in the Goldman Line of
Credit was amended to be December 31, 2017. The Line of Credit
Amendment was executed on January 23, 2017.
In addition, on January 23, 2017, the Company and Crocker amended
the New Crocker LOC to extend the maturity date thereof to December
31, 2017.
On May 10, 2017, Goldman and Crocker agreed to
further extend the maturity dates of Lines of Credit to December
31, 2018.
As the
aforementioned amendments to the Lines of Credit resulted in an
increase to the borrowing capacity of the Lines of Credit, the
Company adjusted the amortization period of any remaining
unamortized deferred costs and note discounts to the term of the
new arrangement.
The
Company evaluated the Lines of Credit and determined that the
instruments contain a contingent beneficial conversion feature,
i.e. an embedded conversion right that enables the holder to obtain
the underlying Common Stock at a price below market value. The
beneficial conversion feature is contingent as the terms of the
conversion do not permit the Company to compute the number of
shares that the holder would receive if the contingent event occurs
(i.e. future borrowings under the Line of Credit). The Company has
considered the accounting for this contingent beneficial conversion
feature using the guidance in ASC 470, Debt. The guidance in ASC
470 states that a contingent beneficial conversion feature in an
instrument shall not be recognized in earnings until the
contingency is resolved. The beneficial conversion features of
future borrowings under the Line of Credit will be measured
using the intrinsic value calculated at the date the contingency is
resolved using the conversion price and trading value of the
Company’s Common Stock at the date the Lines of Credit were
issued (commitment date). Pursuant to borrowings made during the
2015 year, the Company recognized approximately $146,000 in
beneficial conversion feature as debt discount. As a result of the
retirement of all amounts outstanding under the Lines of Credit in
2015, the Company recognized all remaining unamortized debt
discount of approximately $385,000 as a component of interest
expense during the three months ended March 31, 2015. As a result
of $2,650,000 in borrowings under the Lines of Credit during the
year ended December 31, 2016, the Company recorded approximately
$219,000 in debt discount attributable to the beneficial conversion
feature during the year ended December 31, 2016. During the year
ended December 31, 2016, the Company accreted approximately $97,000
of debt discount as a component of interest expense. At December
31, 2016, unamortized note discount was approximately $122,000. As
a result of an additional $3,350,000 in borrowings under the Lines
of Credit during the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company
recorded approximately $302,000 in debt discount attributable to
the beneficial conversion feature during the year ended December
31, 2017. During the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company
accreted approximately $198,000 of debt discount which is
classified as a component of interest expense. At December 31,
2017, unamortized note discount was approximately
$226,000.
The
following table sets forth the Company’s activity under its
Lines of Credit for the periods indicated:
Balance
outstanding under Lines of Credit as of December 31,
2015
|
$—
|
Borrowing
under Lines of Credit
|
2,650
|
Repayments
|
—
|
Balance
outstanding under Lines of Credit as of December 31,
2016
|
$2,650
|
Borrowings
under Lines of Credit
|
3,350
|
Repayments
|
—
|
Balance
outstanding under Lines of Credit as of December 31,
2017
|
$6,000
|
Series A Preferred Stock
A
member of the Company's Board of Directors and certain members of
management participated in the Series A Preferred Stock financing
on the same terms as all other participants. Management purchased
an aggregate of 125 shares for $125,000 and our Board Member
purchased 855 shares for $855,000.
6. INVENTORY
Inventories of
$79,000 as of December 31, 2017
were comprised of work in process of $53,000 representing direct
labor costs on in-process projects and finished goods of
$26,000 net of reserves for
obsolete and slow-moving items of $3,000.
Inventories of $23,000 as of December 31, 2016 were comprised of
work in process of $19,000 representing direct labor costs on
in-process projects and finished goods of $4,000 net of reserves
for obsolete and slow-moving items of $3,000.
Appropriate consideration is given to obsolescence, excessive
levels, deterioration and other factors in evaluating net
realizable value and required reserve levels.
7. PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT
Property
and equipment at December 31, 2017 and 2016, consists
of:
($ in thousands)
|
2017
|
2016
|
|
|
|
Equipment
|
$946
|
$935
|
Leasehold
improvements
|
11
|
11
|
Furniture
|
102
|
101
|
|
1,059
|
1,047
|
Less
accumulated depreciation
|
(1,016)
|
(954)
|
|
$43
|
$93
|
Total
depreciation expense for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016
and 2015 was approximately $56,000, $117,000 and $137,000,
respectively.
8. ACCRUED EXPENSES
Principal
components of accrued expenses consist of:
($ in thousands)
|
December 31,
2017
|
December 31,
2016
|
|
|
|
Compensated
absences
|
$273
|
$313
|
Wages,
payroll taxes and sales commissions
|
38
|
28
|
Customer
deposits
|
40
|
198
|
Royalties
|
72
|
147
|
Pension
and employee benefit plans
|
5
|
7
|
Professional
services
|
100
|
—
|
Income
and sales taxes
|
27
|
161
|
Dividends
|
34
|
27
|
Other
|
69
|
64
|
|
$658
|
$945
|
9. LINES OF CREDIT
Outstanding
lines of credit consist of the following:
($ in thousands)
|
December
31,
2017
|
December 31,
2016
|
Lines
of Credit with Related Parties
|
|
|
8%
convertible lines of credit. Face value of advances under lines of
credit $6,000 at December 31, 2017 and $2,650 at December 31, 2016.
Discount on advances under lines of credit is $226 at December 31,
2017 and $122 at December 31, 2016. Maturity date is December
31, 2018.
|
$5,774
|
$2,528
|
|
|
|
Total
lines of credit to related parties
|
5,774
|
2,528
|
Less
current portion
|
(5,774)
|
(2,528)
|
Long-term
lines of credit to related parties
|
$—
|
$—
|
For a more detailed discussion of the Company’s Lines of
Credit, see Note 5, Related Parties.
10. INCOME TAXES
The Company accounts for income taxes in
accordance with ASC 740, Accounting for Income
Taxes, (ASC 740). Deferred
income taxes are recognized for the tax consequences related to
temporary differences between the carrying amount of assets and
liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used
for tax purposes at each year-end, based on enacted tax laws and
statutory tax rates applicable to the periods in which the
differences are expected to affect taxable income. A valuation
allowance is established when necessary based on the weight of
available evidence, if it is considered more likely than not that
all or some portion of the deferred tax assets will not be
realized. Income tax expense is the sum of current income tax plus
the change in deferred tax assets and liabilities. The
Company has established a valuation allowance against its deferred
tax asset due to the uncertainty surrounding the realization of
such asset.
ASC
740 requires a company to first determine whether it is
more-likely-than-not (defined as a likelihood of more than fifty
percent) that a tax position will be sustained based on its
technical merits as of the reporting date, assuming that taxing
authorities will examine the position and have full knowledge of
all relevant information. A tax position that meets this
more-likely-than-not threshold is then measured and recognized at
the largest amount of benefit that is greater than fifty percent
likely to be realized upon effective settlement with a taxing
authority. The amount accrued for uncertain tax
positions was zero at December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015,
respectively.
The
Company’s uncertain position relative to unrecognized tax
benefits and any potential increase in these liabilities relates
primarily to the allocations of revenue and costs among the
Company’s global operations and the impact of tax rulings
made during the period affecting its tax positions. The
Company’s existing tax position could result in liabilities
for unrecognized tax benefits. The Company recognizes interest
and/or penalties related to uncertain tax positions in income tax
expense. The amount of interest and penalties accrued as of
December 31, 2017 and 2016 was approximately $10,000 and $12,000,
respectively.
Significant
judgment is required in evaluating the Company’s uncertain
tax positions and determining the Company’s provision for
income taxes. No assurance can be given that the final tax outcome
of these matters will not be different from that which is reflected
in the Company’s historical income tax provisions and
accruals. The Company adjusts these items in light of changing
facts and circumstances. To the extent that the final tax outcome
of these matters is different than the amounts recorded, such
differences will impact the provision for income taxes in the
period in which such determination is made.
The
significant components of the income tax provision are as
follows:
($ in thousands)
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
||
Current
|
2017
|
2016
|
2015
|
Federal
|
$—
|
$—
|
$—
|
State
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
Foreign
|
(124)
|
21
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
State
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
Foreign
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
$(124)
|
$21
|
$22
|
The
principal components of the Company’s deferred tax assets at
December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 are as follows:
($ in thousands)
|
2017
|
2016
|
2015
|
|
|
|
|
Net
operating loss carryforwards
|
$13,734
|
$17,829
|
$15,948
|
Intangible
and fixed assets
|
(28)
|
102
|
220
|
Stock
based compensation
|
1,954
|
2,324
|
1,861
|
Reserves
and accrued expenses
|
38
|
8
|
8
|
Other
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
15,698
|
20,263
|
18,037
|
Less
valuation allowance
|
(15,698)
|
(20,263)
|
(18,037)
|
|
|
|
|
Net
deferred tax assets
|
$—
|
$—
|
$—
|
A
reconciliation of the provision for income taxes to the amount
computed by applying the statutory income tax rates to loss before
income taxes is as follows:
|
2017
|
2016
|
2015
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts
computed at statutory rates
|
$(3,423)
|
$(3,239)
|
$(2,902)
|
State
income tax, net of federal benefit
|
(497)
|
(462)
|
(262)
|
Expiration
of net operating loss carryforwards
|
688
|
1,082
|
695
|
Non-deductible
interest
|
250
|
49
|
149
|
Tax
Act – federal rate change
|
7,276
|
—
|
—
|
Foreign
taxes
|
143
|
362
|
413
|
Other
|
4
|
3
|
5
|
Net
change in valuation allowance on deferred tax assets
|
(4,565)
|
2,226
|
1,924
|
|
|
|
|
|
$(124)
|
$21
|
$22
|
The
Company has established a valuation allowance against its deferred
tax assets due to the uncertainty surrounding the realization of
such assets.
On December 22,
2017 the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the “Act”) was enacted into laws and
the new legislation reduces the corporate tax rate to 21% effective
January 1, 2018. Consequently, the Company remeasured the deferred
tax assets and recorded a decrease in federal tax assets and
valuation allowance of approximately $7,276,000. The Company
believes that the one-time transition tax does not apply because
there were no post-1986 earnings and profits previously deferred
from US income taxes.
At
December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, the Company had federal and state
net operating loss carryforwards, a portion of which may be
available to offset future taxable income for tax purposes. The
federal net operating loss carryforwards expire at various dates
from 2022 through 2037. The state net operating loss carryforwards
expire at various dates from 2030 through 2037.
The Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”) limits the availability of certain tax
credits and net operating losses that arose prior to certain
cumulative changes in a corporation’s ownership resulting in
a change of control of the Company. The Company’s use of its
net operating loss carryforwards and tax credit carryforwards will
be significantly limited because the Company believes it underwent
“ownership changes,” as defined under Section 382 of
the Internal Revenue Code, in 1991, 1995, 2000, 2003, 2004, 2011
and 2012, though the Company has not performed a study to determine
the limitation. The Company has reduced its deferred tax assets to
zero relating to its federal and state research credits because of
such limitations. The Company continues to disclose the tax effect
of the net operating loss carryforwards at their original amount in
the table above as the actual limitation has not yet been
quantified. The Company has also established a full valuation
allowance for substantially all deferred tax assets due to
uncertainties surrounding its ability to generate future taxable
income to realize these assets. Since substantially all deferred
tax assets are fullyreserved, future changes in tax benefits will
not impact the effective tax rate. Management periodically
evaluates the recoverability of the deferred tax assets. If it is
determined at some time in the future that it is more likely than
not that deferred tax assets will be realized, the valuation
allowance would be reduced accordingly at that
time.
Tax returns for the years 2013 through 2017 are
subject to examination by taxing authorities.
11. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Employment Agreements
The
Company has employment agreements with its Chief Executive Officer
and its Chief Technical Officer. The Company may terminate the
agreements with or without cause. Subject to the conditions and
other limitations set forth in each respective employment
agreement, each executive will be entitled to the following
severance benefits if the Company terminates the executive’s
employment without cause or in the event of an involuntary
termination (as defined in the employment agreements) by the
Company or by the executive:
Under
the terms of the agreement, the Chief Executive Officer will be
entitled to the following severance benefits if we terminate his
employment without cause or in the event of an involuntary
termination: (i) a lump sum cash payment equal to twenty-four
months’ base salary; (ii) continuation of fringe benefits and
medical insurance for a period of three years; and (iii) immediate
vesting of 50% of outstanding stock options and restricted stock
awards. In the event that the Chief Executive Officer’s
employment is terminated within six months prior to or thirteen
months following a change of control (as defined in the employment
agreements), the Chief Executive Officer is entitled to the
severance benefits described above, except that 100% of the Chief
Executive Officer’s outstanding stock options and restricted
stock awards will immediately vest.
Under
the terms of the employment agreement with our Chief Technical
Officer, this executive will be entitled to the following severance
benefits if we terminate his employment without cause or in the
event of an involuntary termination: (i) a lump sum cash payment
equal to six months of base salary; and (ii) continuation of their
fringe benefits and medical insurance for a period of six months.
In the event that his employment is terminated within six months
prior to or thirteen months following a change of control (as
defined in the employment agreements), he is entitled to the
severance benefits described above, except that 100% of his
outstanding stock options and restricted stock awards will
immediately vest.
The
employment agreements for the Company’s Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Technical Officer were amended to extend the term
of each executive officer's employment agreement until December 31,
2018.
Litigation
There
is no action, suit, proceeding, inquiry or investigation before or
by any court, public board, government agency, self-regulatory
organization or body pending or, to the knowledge of the executive
officers of the Company or any of our subsidiaries, threatened
against or affecting the Company, our Common Stock, any of our
subsidiaries or of the Company’s or our subsidiaries’
officers or directors in their capacities as such, in which an
adverse decision could have a material adverse effect.
Leases
The
Company’s corporate headquarters are located in San Diego,
California where we occupy 9,927 square feet of office space. This
facility’s lease was renewed in September 2017 through
October 2018 at a cost of approximately $30,000 per month. In
addition to our corporate headquarters, we also occupied the
following spaces at December 31, 2017:
●
1,508 square feet in Ottawa, Province of Ontario, Canada, at a cost
of approximately $3,000 per month until the expiration of the lease
on March 31, 2021. This lease was renewed in April 2016 for a
five-year period ending on March 31, 2021. Renewal terms were
substantially unchanged from the existing lease;
●
9,720 square feet in Portland, Oregon, at a cost of approximately
$21,000 per month until the expiration of the lease on December 31,
2021. This lease was renewed in September 2017 resulting in an
additional 1,675 feet, an increase from approximately $18,000 to
approximately $21,000 per month and the extension of the term from
October 2018 to December 2021; and
●
304 square feet of office space in Mexico
City, Mexico, at a cost of approximately $3,000 per month
until November 30,
2018.
At
December 31, 2017, future minimum lease payments are as
follows:
($ in thousands)
|
|
2018
|
$607
|
2019
|
284
|
2020
|
291
|
2021
|
272
|
2022
|
270
|
Thereafter
|
46
|
Total
|
$1,770
|
Rental
expense incurred under operating leases for the years ended
December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 was approximately $545,000,
$492,000 and $477,000, respectively.
12. EQUITY
The
Company’s Certificate of Incorporation, as amended, authorize
the issuance of two classes of stock to be designated “Common
Stock” and “Preferred Stock”. The Preferred Stock
may be divided into such number of series and with the rights,
preferences, privileges and restrictions as the Board of Directors
may determine.
Series A Convertible Preferred Stock
On
September 15, 2017, the Company filed the Certificate of
Designations of the Series A Preferred with the Delaware Secretary
of State, designating 31,021 shares of the Company’s
preferred stock, par value $0.01 per share, as Series A Preferred.
Shares of Series A Preferred accrue dividends at a rate of 8% per
annum if the Company chooses to pay accrued dividends in cash, and
10% per annum if the Company chooses to pay accrued dividends in
shares of Common Stock. Each share of Series A Preferred has a
liquidation preference of $1,000 per share and is convertible, at
the option of the holder, into that number of shares of the
Company’s Common Stock equal to the Liquidation Preference,
divided by $1.15. Each holder of the Series A Preferred is entitled
to vote on all matters, together with the holders of Common Stock,
on an as converted basis.
Holders of Series A Preferred may elect to convert
shares of Series A Preferred into Conversion Shares at any time. In
the event the volume-weighted average price
(“VWAP”) of the Company’s Common Stock is at
least $2.15 per share for at least 20 consecutive trading days, the
Company may elect to convert one-half of the shares of Series A
Preferred issued and outstanding, on a pro-rata basis, into
Conversion Shares, or, if the VWAP of the Company’s Common
Stock is at least $2.15 for 80 consecutive trading days, the
Company may convert all issued and outstanding shares of Series A
Preferred into Conversion Shares. In addition, in the event of a
Change of Control, the Company will have the option to redeem all
issued and outstanding shares of Series A Preferred for 115% of the
Liquidation Preference per share.
On
September 18, 2017, the Company offered and sold a total of 11,000
shares of Series A Preferred at a purchase price of $1,000 per
share. The total net proceeds to the Company from the Series A
Financing were approximately $10.9 million.
Concurrently with the Series A Financing, the
Company entered into Exchange Agreements with holders of all
outstanding shares of the Company's Series E Convertible Preferred
Stock, all outstanding shares of the Company's Series F Convertible
Preferred Stock and all outstanding shares of the Company's Series
G Convertible Preferred Stock (collectively
“Exchanged
Preferred”) pursuant to
which the holders thereof agreed to cancel their respective shares
of Exchanged Preferred in exchange for shares of Series A
Preferred. As a result of the Preferred Stock Exchange, the Company
issued to the holders of the Exchanged Preferred an aggregate total
of 20,021 shares of Series A
Preferred.
The Company evaluated the Preferred Stock Exchange
and determined that the Preferred Stock Exchange was both an
induced conversion and an extinguishment transaction. Using the
guidance in ASC 260-10-S99-2, Earnings Per Share – SEC
Materials – SEC Staff Announcement: The Effect on the
Calculations of Earnings Per Share for a Period That Includes the
Redemption or Induced Conversion of Preferred Stock and
ASC 470-50, Debt – Modifications and
Extinguishments, the Company
recorded the fair value differential of the Exchanged Preferred as
adjustments within Shareholders’ Deficit and in the
computation of Net Loss Available to Common Shareholders in the
computation of basic and diluted loss per share. The Company
utilized the services an independent third-party valuation firm to
perform the computation of the fair value of the Exchanged
Preferred. Based on the fair value using these methodologies, the
Company recorded approximately $1,245,000 in fair value
differential as adjustments within Shareholders’ Deficit in
the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheet for the year ended
December 31, 2017 and in the computation of basic and diluted loss
per share in the Company’s Consolidated Statement of
Operations for the year ended December 31,
2017.
The Company had 31,021 shares and 0 shares of
Series A Preferred outstanding as of December 31, 2017 and December
31, 2016, respectively. At December 31, 2017, the
Company had cumulative undeclared dividends of $0. There
were no conversions of Series A Preferred into Common Stock during
the year ended December 31, 2017. During the year ended
December 31, 2017, the Company issued the
holders of Series A Preferred 585,058 shares of Common Stock as
payment of dividends due.
Series B Convertible Redeemable Preferred Stock
The Company had 239,400 shares of Series B
Convertible Redeemable Preferred Stock (“Series B
Preferred”) outstanding
as of December 31, 2017 and 2016. At December 31, 2017 and 2016,
the Company had cumulative undeclared dividends of approximately
$8,000 ($0.03 per share). There were no conversions of Series B
Preferred into Common Stock during the years ended December 31,
2017, 2016 and 2015. The Company paid dividends of approximately
$51,000 to the holders of our Series B Preferred in 2017, 2016 and
2015.
Series E Convertible Preferred Stock
On
January 29, 2015, the Company filed the Certificate of Designations
of the Series E Preferred Stock with the Delaware Secretary of
State, designating 12,000 shares of the Company’s preferred
stock, par value $0.01 per share, as Series E Preferred. Shares of
Series E Preferred accrue dividends at a rate of 8% per annum if
the Company chooses to pay accrued dividends in cash, and 10% per
annum if the Company chooses to pay accrued dividends in shares of
Common Stock. Each share of Series E Preferred has a liquidation
preference of $1,000 per share and is convertible, at the option of
the holder, into that number of shares of the Company’s
Common Stock equal to the Liquidation Preference, divided by $1.90.
The Series E Preferred shall be subordinate to and rank junior to
the Company's Series A Preferred, Series B Preferred and all
indebtedness of the Company. Each holder of the Series E Preferred
is entitled to vote on all matters, together with the holders of
Common Stock, on an as converted basis.
Any time after the six-month period following the
issuance date, in the event the arithmetic average of the closing
sales price of the Company’s Common Stock is or was at least
$2.85 for twenty (20) consecutive trading days, the Company may
redeem all or a portion of the Series E Preferred outstanding upon
thirty (30) calendar day's prior written notice (the
“Company's Redemption
Notice”) in cash at a
price per share of Series E Preferred equal to 110% of the
liquidation preference amount plus all accrued and unpaid
dividends. Also, simultaneous with the occurrence of a
change of control transaction, the Company, at its option, shall
have the right to redeem all or a portion of the outstanding Series
E Preferred in cash at a price per share of Series E Preferred
equal to 110% of the liquidation preference amount plus all accrued
and unpaid dividends.
In
February 2015, the Company consummated a registered direct offering
conducted without an underwriter or placement agent. In connection
therewith, the Company issued 12,000 shares of Series E Preferred
to certain investors at a price of $1,000 per share, with each
share convertible into 526.32 shares of the Company’s Common
Stock at $1.90 per share.
On December 29, 2016, the Company filed Amendment
No. 1 to the Certificate of Designations, Preferences and Rights of
the Series E Convertible Preferred Stock (the
“Series E
Amendment”) with the
Delaware Division of Corporations. The Series E Amendment made the
following changes to the Certificate of Designations, Preferences
and Rights of the Series E Convertible Preferred Stock: (i) the
Company may only make dividend payments in cash received from
positive cash flow from operations; (ii) beginning on July 1, 2017,
in the event the Company pays accrued dividend payments in shares
of Common Stock for more than four consecutive quarterly periods,
holders of shares of Series E Preferred will have the right to
immediately appoint two designees to the Company’s Board of
Directors (the “ Director Appointment
Provision ”); (iii)
dividend payments incurred on December 31, 2016 and March 31, 2017
may be paid in shares of Common Stock, without triggering the
Director Appointment Provision; and (iv) the term Permitted
Indebtedness (as defined in the Series E Certificate of
Designations) was revised to cover permitted borrowings of up to
$6.0 million.
The
Company had 0 shares of Series E Preferred outstanding as of
December 31, 2017 as a result of the Preferred Stock Exchange, and
12,000 shares of Series E Preferred outstanding at December 31,
2016. At December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the
Company had cumulative undeclared dividends of $0. There
were no conversions of Series E Preferred into Common Stock during
the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016. For the year ended
December 31, 2017, the Company has issued the holders of Series E
Preferred 822,122 shares of Common Stock as payment of dividends
due. With the payment of the quarterly dividends due September 30,
2017 to the holders of Series E Preferred in shares of Common
Stock, the Director Appointment Provision became effective as of
that date resulting in the Company adding two Board members as of
September 15, 2017.
Series F Convertible Preferred Stock
In September 2016, we filed the Certificate of
Designations, Preferences, and Rights of the Series F Convertible
Preferred Stock (the “Certificate of
Designations”) with the
Delaware Division of Corporations, designating 2,000 shares of our
preferred stock as Series F Convertible Preferred Stock
(“Series F
Preferred”). Shares of
Series F Preferred rank junior to shares of Series A Preferred,
Series B Preferred and Series E Preferred, as well as our existing
indebtedness, and accrue dividends at a rate of 10% per annum,
payable on a quarterly basis in shares of Common
Stock.
Each share of Series F Preferred has a liquidation
preference of $1,000 per share (“Liquidation
Preference”), and is
convertible, at the option of the holder, into that number of
shares of the Company’s Common Stock equal to the Series F
Liquidation Preference, divided by $1.50 (the
“Series F Conversion
Shares”).
Any
time after the six-month period following the issuance date, in the
event the arithmetic average of the closing sales price of the
Company’s Common Stock is or was at least $2.50 for twenty
(20) consecutive trading days, the Company may redeem all or a
portion of the Series F Preferred outstanding upon thirty (30)
calendar days prior written notice in cash at a price per share of
Series F Preferred equal to 110% of the Series F Liquidation
Preference, plus all accrued and unpaid dividends. Also,
simultaneous with the occurrence of a Change of Control transaction
(as defined in the Certificate of Designations), the Company, at
its option, shall have the right to redeem all or a portion of the
outstanding Series F Preferred in cash at a price per share of
Series F Preferred equal to 110% of the Liquidation Preference
Amount plus all accrued and unpaid dividends.
In September 2016, the Company offered and sold
2,000 shares of Series F Preferred for $1,000 per share (the
“Series F
Financing”), resulting in
gross proceeds to the Company of $2,000,000 net of issuance costs
of approximately $21,000.
The Company had 0 shares of Series F Preferred
outstanding as of December 31, 2017 as a result of
the Preferred Stock Exchange, and 2,000 shares of Series F
Preferred at December 31, 2016. At December 31, 2017 and December 31,
2016, the Company had cumulative undeclared dividends of $0. There
were no conversions of Series F Preferred into Common Stock during
the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016. For the year ended
December 31, 2017, the Company has issued the holders of Series F
Preferred 135,855 shares of Common Stock as payment of dividends
due.
Series G Convertible Preferred Stock
In December 27, 2016, the Company filed the
Certificate of Designations, Preferences, and Rights of the Series
G Convertible Preferred Stock with the Delaware Division of
Corporations, designating 6,120 shares of the Company’s
preferred stock, par value $0.01 per share, as Series G Convertible
Preferred Stock (“Series G
Preferred”). Shares of
Series G Preferred rank junior to the Company’s Series A
Preferred, Series B Preferred, Series E Preferred, Series F
Preferred as well as the Company’s existing indebtedness, and
accrue dividends at a rate of 10% per annum, payable on a quarterly
basis in shares of the Company’s common stock, par value
$0.01 per share. Each share of Series G Preferred has a liquidation
preference of $1,000 per share (“Series G Liquidation
Preference”), and is
convertible, at the option of the holder, into that number of
shares of the Company’s Common Stock equal to the Series G
Liquidation Preference, divided by $1.50.
Any
time after the six-month period following the issuance date, in the
event the arithmetic average of the closing sales price of the
Company’s Common Stock is or was at least $2.50 for twenty
(20) consecutive trading days, the Company may redeem all or a
portion of the Series G Preferred outstanding upon thirty (30)
calendar days prior written notice in cash at a price per share of
Series G Preferred equal to 110% of the Series G Liquidation
Preference, plus all accrued and unpaid dividends. Also,
simultaneous with the occurrence of a Change of Control transaction
(as defined in the Certificate of Designations), the Company, at
its option, shall have the right to redeem all or a portion of the
outstanding Series G Preferred in cash at a price per share of
Series G Preferred equal to 110% of the Liquidation Preference
Amount plus all accrued and unpaid dividends.
On December 29, 2016, the Company accepted
subscription forms from certain accredited investors to purchase a
total of 1,625 shares of Series G Preferred for $1,000 per share
(the “Series G
Financing”), resulting in
gross proceeds to the Company of $1,625,000, net of issuance cost
of approximately $11,000. In addition, the Company also received
executed exchange agreements from the Investors pursuant to which
the Company exchanged an aggregate total of 3,383,830 shares of
common stock held by the Investors for an aggregate total of 4,396
shares of Series G Preferred.
The
Company had 0 shares of Series G Preferred outstanding as of
December 31, 2017 as a result of the Preferred Stock Exchange, and
6,021 shares of Series G Preferred at December 31,
2016. At December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the
Company had cumulative undeclared dividends of $0. There
were no conversions of Series G Preferred into Common Stock during
the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016. For the year ended
December 31, 2017, the Company has issued the holders of Series G
Preferred 409,002 shares of Common Stock as payment of dividends
due.
Common Stock
The
following table summarizes outstanding Common Stock activity for
the following periods:
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
Shares
outstanding at December 31, 2014
|
93,507,150
|
Shares issued pursuant to payment of stock dividend on Series E
Preferred
|
478,664
|
Shares issued pursuant to cashless warrants exercised
|
45,376
|
Shares issued pursuant to option exercises
|
39,705
|
Shares
outstanding at December 31, 2015
|
94,070,895
|
Shares issued pursuant to payment of stock dividend on Series E
Preferred
|
950,362
|
Shares issued pursuant to payment of stock dividend on Series F
Preferred
|
48,513
|
Shares issued pursuant to payment of stock dividend on
Series G Preferred
|
3,770
|
Shares issued pursuant to cashless warrants exercised
|
144,459
|
Shares issued pursuant to option exercises
|
12,626
|
Exchange of common shares for Series G
Preferred
|
(3,383,830)
|
Shares
outstanding at December 31, 2016
|
91,846,795
|
Shares issued pursuant to payment of stock dividend on Series A
Preferred
|
585,058
|
Shares issued pursuant to payment of stock dividend on Series E
Preferred
|
822,122
|
Shares issued pursuant to payment of stock dividend on
Series F Preferred
|
135,855
|
Shares issued pursuant to payment of stock dividend on
Series G Preferred
|
409,002
|
Shares issued pursuant to option exercises
|
369,004
|
Shares
outstanding at December 31, 2017
|
94,167,836
|
Warrants
As of December 31, 2017, warrants to purchase
230,000 shares
of Common Stock at prices ranging from $0.80 to $1.17 were
outstanding. All warrants are exercisable as of December 31, 2017
and expire as of September 11, 2019, with the exception of an
aggregate of 150,000 warrants, which become exercisable only upon
the attainment of specified events.
The
following table summarizes warrant activity for the following
periods:
|
Warrants
|
Weighted-
Average
Exercise
Price
|
|
|
|
Balance
at December 31, 2014
|
977,778
|
$1.22
|
Granted
|
—
|
$0.00
|
Expired
/ Canceled
|
(419,444)
|
$1.86
|
Exercised
|
(108,334)
|
$1.01
|
Balance
at December 31, 2015
|
450,000
|
$0.67
|
Exercised
|
(275,000)
|
$0.55
|
Balance
at December 31, 2016
|
175,000
|
$0.84
|
Granted
|
80,000
|
$1.13
|
Expired
/ Canceled
|
(25,000)
|
$1.10
|
Exercised
|
—
|
$—
|
Balance
at December 31, 2017
|
230,000
|
$0.91
|
During
the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company issued an aggregate
of 80,000 warrants to certain members of the Company’s
advisory board. The Company determined the grant date fair value of
these warrants using the Black-Scholes option valuation model and
recorded approximately $57,000 in expense for the year ended
December 31, 2017. The Company used the following assumptions in
the application of the Black-Scholes option valuation model: an
exercise price ranging between $1.09 and $1.17, a term of 2.0
years, a risk-free interest rate of 2.58%, a dividend yield of 0%
and volatility of 59%. Such expense is recorded in the
Company’s consolidated statement of operations as a component
of general and administrative expense. There were no warrants
exercised during the twelve months ended December 31, 2017 and
25,000 warrants expired unexercised during the 2017 year. The
intrinsic value of warrants outstanding as of December 31, 2017 was
approximately $155,000.
13. STOCK-BASED
COMPENSATION
Stock Options
As of December 31, 2017, the Company had one
active stock-based compensation plan: the 1999 Stock Option Plan
(the “1999 Plan”).
1999 Plan
The 1999 Plan was adopted by the Company’s
Board of Directors on December 17, 1999. Under the terms of the
1999 Plan, the Company could, originally, issue up to 350,000
non-qualified or incentive stock options to purchase Common Stock
of the Company. During the year ended December 31, 2014, the
Company subsequently amended and restated the 1999 Plan whereby it
increased the share reserve for issuance to approximately 7.0
million shares of the Company’s Common Stock. The
1999 Plan prohibits the grant of stock option or stock appreciation
right awards with an exercise price less than fair market value of
Common Stock on the date of grant. The 1999 Plan also generally
prohibits the “re-pricing” of stock options or stock
appreciation rights, although awards may be bought-out for a
payment in cash or the Company’s stock. The 1999 Plan permits
the grant of stock-based awards other than stock options, including
the grant of “full value” awards such as restricted
stock, stock units and performance shares. The 1999 Plan permits
the qualification of awards under the plan (payable in either stock
or cash) as “performance-based compensation” within the
meaning of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code. The number
of options issued and outstanding and the number of options
remaining available for future issuance are shown in the table
below. On July 1, 2014, the Company began soliciting written
consents from its shareholders to approve an amendment to the
Company’s 1999 Stock Option Plan to increase the number of
shares authorized for issuance thereunder from approximately 4.0
million to approximately 7.0 million (the
“Amendment”). As
of July 21, 2014, the Company had received written consents
approving the Amendment from over 50% of the Company’s
stockholders. As such, the Amendment was approved. The number of
authorized shares available under the plan for issuance at December
31, 2017 was 6,193,777. The number of available shares under the
plan for issuance at December 31, 2017 was
100,265.
A
summary of the activity under the Company’s stock option
plans is as follows:
|
Options
|
Weighted-
Average
Exercise
Price
|
Weighted-
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Term (Years)
|
Balance
at December 31, 2014
|
4,057,296
|
$1.06
|
6.8
|
Granted
|
2,110,000
|
$1.63
|
—
|
Expired/Cancelled
|
(750,622)
|
$1.86
|
—
|
Exercised
|
(39,705)
|
$0.87
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
Balance
at December 31, 2015
|
5,376,969
|
$1.17
|
6.9
|
Granted
|
1,264,000
|
$1.34
|
—
|
Expired/Cancelled
|
(121,500)
|
$1.29
|
—
|
Exercised
|
(12,626)
|
$0.21
|
—
|
Balance
at December 31, 2016
|
6,506,843
|
$1.21
|
6.6
|
Granted
|
112,500
|
$1.39
|
—
|
Expired/Cancelled
|
(156,827)
|
$1.67
|
—
|
Exercised
|
(369,004)
|
$0.70
|
—
|
Balance
at December 31, 2017
|
6,093,512
|
$1.23
|
5.8
|
At
December 31, 2017, a total of 6,093,512 options were outstanding of
which 5,051,016 were exercisable at a weighted average price of
$1.19 per share with a remaining weighted average contractual term
of approximately 5.3 years. The Company expects that, in
addition to the 5,051,016 options that were exercisable as of
December 31, 2017, another 1,042,496 will ultimately vest resulting
in a combined total of 6,093,512. Those 6,093,512 shares
have a weighted average exercise price of $1.23 and an aggregate
intrinsic value of approximately $2,595,000 as of December 31,
2017. Stock-based compensation expense related to equity options
was approximately $1,094,000, $1,162,000 and $744,000 for the years
ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively.
The weighted-average
grant-date fair value per share of options granted to employees
during the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 was
$0.77, $0.82 and $1.18,
respectively. At December 31, 2017, the total remaining
unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested stock options
amounted to approximately $847,000, which will be
amortized over the weighted-average remaining requisite service
period of 1.3 years.
During
the year ended December 31, 2017, there were 369,004 options
exercised for cash resulting in the issuance of 369,004 shares of
the Company’s Common Stock and proceeds of approximately
$259,000. During the year ended December 31, 2016,
there were 12,626 options exercised for cash resulting in the
issuance of 12,626 shares of the Company’s Common Stock and
proceeds of approximately $3,000.
The intrinsic value of options exercised during
the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 was approximately
$177,000 and $11,000, respectively. The intrinsic value of options
exercisable at December 31, 2017 and 2016 was approximately
$2,388,000 and $1,679,000,
respectively. The intrinsic value of options that vested
during 2017 was approximately $207,000. The aggregate intrinsic
value for all options outstanding as of December 31, 2017 and 2016
was approximately $2,595,000 and $1,744,000,
respectively.
In September 2015, the Company issued an aggregate
of 144,000 options to purchase shares of the Company’s Common
Stock to certain members of the Company’s Board of Directors
in return for their service from January 1, 2016 through December
31, 2016. Such options vest at the rate of 12,000 options per month
on the last day of each month during the 2016 year. The options
have an exercise price of $1.73 per share and a term of 10 years.
Pursuant to this issuance, the Company recorded compensation
expense of approximately $178,000 the twelve months ended December
31, 2016 based on the grant-date fair value of the options
determined using the Black-Scholes option-valuation
model.
In
May 2016, the Company issued an aggregate of 16,000 options to
purchase shares of the Company’s Common Stock to a new member
of the Company’s Board of Directors in return for their
service from May 2016 through December 31, 2016. Such options vest
at the rate of 2,000 options per month on the last day of each
month during the 2016 year. The options have an exercise price of
$1.29 per share and a term of 10 years. Pursuant to this issuance,
the Company recorded compensation expense of approximately $12,000
for the twelve months ended December 31, 2016 based on the
grant-date fair value of the options determined using the
Black-Scholes option-valuation model.
In
September 2016, the Company issued an aggregate of 168,000 options
to purchase shares of the Company’s Common Stock to certain
members of the Company’s Board of Directors in return for
their service from January 1, 2017 through December 31, 2017. Such
options vested at the rate of 14,000 options per month on the last
day of each month during the 2017 year. The options have an
exercise price of $1.37 per share and a term of 10 years. The
Company began recognition of compensation based on the grant-date
fair value ratably over the 2017 requisite service period and
recorded approximately $140,000 in expense. Such expense is
recorded in the Company’s consolidated statement of
operations as a component of general and administrative
expense.
Restricted Stock Awards
There
were no restricted stock awards issued during the years ended
December 31, 2017 and 2016.
In
December 2014, the Company issued 94,116 shares of its Common Stock
to certain members of the Company’s Board of Directors as
compensation for services to be rendered through December
2015. Such shares vested monthly over the 12 months of
2015 with any unvested shares being forfeitable should the Board
members’ service be terminated during 2015. For the year
ended December 31, 2015, the Company recorded approximately
$216,000 as compensation expense related to this stock
issuance.
Stock-based Compensation
Stock-based
compensation related to equity options and restricted stock has
been classified as follows in the accompanying consolidated
statements of operations (in thousands):
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
||
|
2017
|
2016
|
2015
|
Cost
of revenues
|
$19
|
$20
|
$15
|
General
and administrative
|
655
|
714
|
618
|
Sales
and marketing
|
220
|
224
|
171
|
Research
and development
|
200
|
204
|
156
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
$1,094
|
$1,162
|
$960
|
Common Stock Reserved for Future Issuance
The
following table summarizes the Common Stock reserved for future
issuance as of December 31, 2017:
|
Common Stock
|
Convertible
preferred stock – Series A and Series B
|
27,020,812
|
Convertible
lines of credit
|
5,221,964
|
Stock options outstanding
|
6,093,512
|
Warrants
outstanding
|
230,000
|
Authorized for future grant under stock option
plans
|
100,265
|
14. EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLAN
During 1995, the Company adopted a defined
contribution 401(k) retirement plan (the “Plan”). All U.S. based employees aged 21 years
and older are eligible to become participants after the completion
of 60 day's employment. The Plan provides for annual contributions
by the Company of 50% of employee contributions not to exceed 8% of
employee compensation. Effective April 1, 2009, the Plan
was amended to provide for Company contributions on a discretionary
basis. Participants may contribute up to 100% of the annual
contribution limitations determined by the Internal Revenue
Service.
Employees
are fully vested in their share of the Company’s
contributions after the completion of five years of
service. In 2015, the Company authorized contributions of
approximately $119,000 for the 2015 plan year of which $83,000 were
paid prior to December 31, 2015. In 2016, the Company authorized
contributions of approximately $150,000 for the 2016 plan year of
which $111,000 were paid prior to December 31, 2016. In 2017,
the Company authorized contributions of approximately $154,000 for
the 2017 plan year of which $115,000 were paid prior to December
31, 2017.
15. PENSION PLAN
One
of the Company’s dormant foreign subsidiaries maintains a
defined benefit pension plan that provides benefits based on length
of service and final average earnings. The following table sets
forth the benefit obligation, fair value of plan assets, and the
funded status of the Company’s plan; amounts recognized in
the Company’s consolidated financial statements; and the
assumptions used in determining the actuarial present value of the
benefit obligations as of December 31:
($ in thousands)
|
2017
|
2016
|
2015
|
Change in benefit obligation:
|
|
|
|
Benefit
obligation at beginning of year
|
$3,540
|
$3,068
|
$3,488
|
Service
cost
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
Interest
cost
|
64
|
75
|
70
|
Actuarial
(gain) loss
|
(167)
|
542
|
(123)
|
Effect
of exchange rate changes
|
473
|
(114)
|
(356)
|
Effect
of curtailment
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
Benefits
paid
|
(80)
|
(31)
|
(11)
|
Benefit
obligation at end of year
|
3,830
|
3,540
|
3,068
|
|
|
|
|
Change
in plan assets:
|
|
|
|
Fair
value of plan assets at beginning of year
|
1,645
|
1,557
|
1,654
|
Actual
return of plan assets
|
7
|
142
|
40
|
Company
contributions
|
12
|
28
|
34
|
Benefits
paid
|
(80)
|
(31)
|
—
|
Effect
of exchange rate changes
|
222
|
(51)
|
(171)
|
Fair
value of plan assets at end of year
|
1,806
|
1,645
|
1,557
|
Funded
status
|
(2,024)
|
(1,895)
|
(1,511)
|
Unrecognized
actuarial loss (gain)
|
1,629
|
1,831
|
1,413
|
Unrecognized
prior service (benefit) cost
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
Additional
minimum liability
|
(1,629)
|
(1,831)
|
(1,413)
|
Unrecognized
transition (asset) liability
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
Net
amount recognized
|
$(2,024)
|
$(1,895)
|
$(1,511)
|
|
|
|
|
Plan
Assets
|
|
|
|
Pension
plan assets were comprised of the following asset categories at
December 31,
|
|
|
|
Equity
securities
|
5.7%
|
5.7%
|
5.0%
|
Debt
securities
|
86.7%
|
87.2%
|
89.3%
|
Other
|
7.6%
|
7.1%
|
5.7%
|
Total
|
100%
|
100%
|
100%
|
|
|
|
|
Components
of net periodic benefit cost are as follows:
|
|
|
|
Service
cost
|
$—
|
$—
|
$—
|
Interest
cost on projected benefit obligations
|
64
|
75
|
70
|
Expected
return on plan assets
|
(70)
|
(63)
|
(61)
|
Amortization
of prior service costs
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
Amortization
of actuarial loss
|
104
|
73
|
80
|
Net
periodic benefit costs
|
$98
|
$85
|
$89
|
|
|
|
|
The
weighted average assumptions used to determine net periodic benefit
cost for the years ended December 31, were
|
|
|
|
Discount
rate
|
1.9%
|
1.7%
|
2.4%
|
Expected
return on plan assets
|
3.2%
|
4.0%
|
4.0%
|
Rate
of pension increases
|
2.0%
|
2.0%
|
2.0%
|
Rate
of compensation increase
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
The
following discloses information about the Company’s defined
benefit pension plan that had an accumulated benefit obligation in
excess of plan assets as of December 31,
|
|
|
|
Projected
benefit obligation
|
$3,830
|
$3,540
|
$3,068
|
Accumulated
benefit obligation
|
$3,830
|
$3,540
|
$3,068
|
Fair
value of plan assets
|
$1,806
|
$1,645
|
$1,557
|
As
of December 31, 2017, the following benefit payments are expected
to be paid as follows (in thousands):
2018
|
$86
|
2019
|
$87
|
2020
|
$88
|
2021
|
$103
|
2022
|
$105
|
2023
— 2027
|
$676
|
The
Company made contributions to the plan of approximately $12,000
during year 2017, $28,000 during year 2016 and approximately
$34,000 during 2015.
The
investment objectives for the plan are the preservation of capital,
current income and long-term growth of capital. The Company’s
pension assets are classified within Level 1 of the fair value
hierarchy, as defined under ASC 820, because they are valued using
market prices. The pension assets are primarily comprised of the
cash surrender value of insurance contracts. All plan assets are
managed in a policyholder pool in Germany by outside investment
managers. The measurement date used to determine the benefit
information of the plan was January 1, 2018.
16. ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE LOSS
Accumulated other comprehensive income is the
combination of the additional minimum liability related to the
Company’s defined benefit pension plan, recognized pursuant
to ASC 715-30, “Compensation - Retirement
Benefits - Defined Benefit Plans – Pension” and the accumulated gains or losses from
foreign currency translation adjustments. The Company translates
foreign currencies of its German, Canadian and Mexican subsidiaries
into U.S. dollars using the period end exchange rate. Revenue and
expenses were translated using the weighted-average exchange rates
for the reporting period. All items are shown net of
tax.
As
of December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, the components of accumulated
other comprehensive loss were as follows:
($ in thousands)
|
2017
|
2016
|
2015
|
|
|
|
|
Additional
minimum pension liability
|
$(1,353)
|
$(1,338)
|
$(991)
|
Foreign
currency translation adjustment
|
(311)
|
(205)
|
(204)
|
Ending
balance
|
$(1,664)
|
$(1,543)
|
$(1,195)
|
17. QUARTERLY INFORMATION (UNAUDITED)
The
following table sets forth selected quarterly financial data for
2017, 2016 and 2015 (in thousands, except share and per share
data):
|
2017 (by quarter)
|
|||
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
$928
|
$1,060
|
$1,084
|
$1,221
|
Cost
of sales
|
262
|
250
|
231
|
248
|
Operating
expenses
|
3,290
|
3,240
|
3,136
|
3,363
|
Loss
from operations
|
(2,624)
|
(2,430)
|
(2,283)
|
(2,390)
|
Interest
expense (income), net
|
100
|
164
|
178
|
149
|
Other
expense (income), net
|
-
|
(50)
|
(75)
|
-
|
Income
tax expense (benefit)
|
3
|
3
|
4
|
(134)
|
Net
loss
|
$(2,727)
|
$(2,547)
|
$(2,390)
|
$(2,405)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
loss per share:
|
|
|
|
|
Net
loss
|
(0.03)
|
(0.03)
|
(0.03)
|
(0.03)
|
Preferred
dividends
|
(0.01)
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Preferred
stock exchange
|
-
|
-
|
(0.01)
|
-
|
Basic
loss per share to common shareholders
|
(0.04)
|
(0.03)
|
(0.04)
|
(0.03)
|
Basic
weighted-average shares outstanding
|
91,864,174
|
92,539,230
|
93,197,689
|
93,642,074
|
|
2016 (by quarter)
|
|||
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
$1,043
|
$996
|
$848
|
$925
|
Cost
of Sales
|
279
|
275
|
232
|
284
|
Operating
expenses
|
3,028
|
2,995
|
2,955
|
3,226
|
Loss
from Operations
|
(2,264)
|
(2,274)
|
(2,339)
|
(2,585)
|
Interest
expense (income), net
|
11
|
36
|
89
|
109
|
Other
expense (income), net
|
(1)
|
(200)
|
-
|
-
|
Income
tax expense (benefit)
|
3
|
4
|
3
|
11
|
Net
loss
|
$(2,277)
|
$(2,114)
|
$(2,431)
|
$(2,705)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
loss per share:
|
|
|
|
|
Net
loss
|
$(0.03)
|
$(0.02)
|
$(0.03)
|
$(0.03)
|
Preferred
dividends
|
$(0.00)
|
$(0.01)
|
$(0.00)
|
$(0.00)
|
Basic
loss per share to common shareholders
|
$(0.03)
|
$(0.03)
|
$(0.03)
|
$(0.03)
|
Basic
weighted-average shares outstanding
|
94,073,367
|
94,298,567
|
94,550,721
|
94,779,243
|
|
2015 (by quarter)
|
|||
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
$991
|
$1,695
|
$1,181
|
$902
|
Cost
of Sales
|
286
|
798
|
321
|
539
|
Operating
expenses
|
2,641
|
2,660
|
2,813
|
2,921
|
Loss
from Operations
|
(1,936)
|
(1,763)
|
(1,953)
|
(2,558)
|
Interest
expense (income), net
|
437
|
(2)
|
1
|
11
|
Other
expense (income), net
|
(46)
|
—
|
(99)
|
—
|
Income
tax expense (benefit)
|
3
|
6
|
3
|
10
|
Net
loss
|
$(2,330)
|
$(1,767)
|
$(1,858)
|
$(2,579)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
loss per share:
|
|
|
|
|
Net
loss
|
$(0.03)
|
$(0.02)
|
$(0.02)
|
$(0.03)
|
Preferred
dividends
|
$(0.00)
|
$(0.00)
|
$(0.00)
|
$(0.00)
|
Basic
loss per share to common shareholders
|
$(0.03)
|
$(0.02)
|
$(0.02)
|
$(0.03)
|
Basic
weighted-average shares outstanding
|
93,515,640
|
93,674,349
|
93,876,339
|
94,070,895
|
18. SUBSEQUENT
EVENTS
On
February 8, 2018, the Company filed with the Secretary of State of
the State of Delaware a Certificate of Amendment to its Certificate
of Incorporation, as amended, to increase the authorized number of
shares of its Common Stock to 175,000,000 from 150,000,000
shares.
On
January 4, 2018, the Company amended its 1999 Stock Option Plan to
increase the number of shares authorized for issuance thereunder
from approximately 6.2 million to 8.2 million
Subsequent to
December 31, 2017, the Company issued an aggregate of 1,289,000
options to purchase Common Stock at an exercise price of $1.75 per
share as follows: (i) 414,000 options issued to certain members of
the Board of Directors, (ii) 650,000 options issued to certain
members of senior management and (iii) 225,000 options issued to
certain employees. In addition, the Company issued
61,669 shares of Common Stock pursuant to the exercise of 61,669
options resulting in cash proceeds to the Company of approximately
$65,000.
F-39