IMMERSION CORP - Quarter Report: 2014 June (Form 10-Q)

Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(MARK ONE)

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2014

OR

For the transition period from              to             

Commission file number 000-27969

IMMERSION CORPORATION

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

30 Rio Robles, San Jose, California 95134

(Address of principal executive offices)(Zip Code)

(408) 467-1900

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes  ¨    No  x

Number of shares of common stock outstanding at July 24, 2014: 28,559,337.

Table of Contents

IMMERSION CORPORATION

INDEX

2

Table of Contents

PART I

FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

IMMERSION CORPORATION

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)

(Unaudited)

See accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

3

Table of Contents

IMMERSION CORPORATION

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

(In thousands, except per share amounts)

(Unaudited)

See accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

4

Table of Contents

IMMERSION CORPORATION

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(In thousands)

(Unaudited)

See accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

5

Table of Contents

IMMERSION CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

June 30, 2014

(Unaudited)

Description of Business

Immersion Corporation (the “Company”) was incorporated in 1993 in California and reincorporated in Delaware in 1999. It is an intellectual property (“IP”) and technology licensing company focused on the creation, design, development, and licensing of innovations and technologies that allow people to use their sense of touch more fully when operating a wide variety of digital devices.

Principles of Consolidation and Basis of Presentation

The condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Immersion Corporation and its wholly-owned subsidiaries: Immersion Canada Inc.; Immersion International, LLC; Immersion Medical, Inc.; Immersion Japan K.K.; Immersion Ltd.; Immersion Software Ireland Ltd.; Haptify, Inc.; and Immersion (Shanghai) Science & Technology Company, Ltd. All intercompany accounts, transactions, and balances have been eliminated in consolidation.

The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) for interim financial information and with the instructions for Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X and, therefore, do not include all information and footnotes necessary for a complete presentation of the financial position, results of operations, and cash flows, in conformity with GAAP. These condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013. In the opinion of management, all adjustments consisting of only normal and recurring items necessary for the fair presentation of the financial position and results of operations for the interim periods presented have been included.

The results of operations for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2014 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year.

Segment Information

The Company develops, licenses, and supports a wide range of software and IP that more fully engage users’ sense of touch when operating digital devices. The Company focuses on the following target application areas: mobility and consumer electronics, automotive, gaming, commercial and industrial, and medical. The Company’s chief operating decision maker (“CODM”) is the Chief Executive Officer. The CODM allocates resources to and assesses the performance of the Company using information about its revenue and operating loss as one operating and reporting segment.

Intangible Assets

During the fourth quarter 2013, the Company elected to change its method of accounting for external patent-related costs associated with its internally developed patents and trademarks. Prior to the change the Company capitalized the external legal, filing, continuation or annuity fees associated with patent and trademark applications. These costs were amortized on a straight-line basis over their estimated economic useful lives which were generally ten years from the date of issuance. Under the current method of accounting, external patent-related costs are expensed as incurred and classified as general and administrative expenses in the Company’s condensed consolidated statement of income consistent with the classification of internal legal costs associated with internally developed patents and trademarks. Costs

6

Table of Contents

associated with acquired patents and other intangible assets continue to be capitalized as incurred. These costs are amortized utilizing the straight-line method, which approximates the pattern of consumption over the estimated useful lives of the respective assets, generally ten years.

In accordance with Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 250, “Accounting Changes and Error Corrections,” the change in accounting method has been retrospectively applied to all prior periods presented herein. Comparative financial statements of prior years have been adjusted to apply the new method retrospectively.

Revenue Recognition

The Company recognizes revenues in accordance with applicable accounting standards, including ASC 605-10-S99, “Revenue Recognition” (“ASC 605-10-S99”); ASC 605-25, “Multiple Element Arrangements” (“ASC 605-25”); and ASC 985-605, “Software-Revenue Recognition” (“ASC 985-605”). The Company derives its revenues from three principal sources: royalty and license fees, development contract and service fees, and, previously, product sales. As described below, management judgments, assumptions, and estimates must be made and used in connection with the revenue recognized in any accounting period. Material differences may result in the amount and timing of revenue for any period based on the judgments and estimates made by management. Specifically, in connection with each transaction, the Company must evaluate whether: (i) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, (ii) delivery has occurred, (iii) the fee is fixed or determinable, and (iv) collectibility is probable. The Company applies these criteria as discussed below.

Royalty and license revenue — The Company licenses its patents and software to customers in a variety of industries such as mobility, gaming, automotive, and medical devices. Certain of these are variable fee arrangements where the royalties earned by the Company are based on unit or sales volumes of the respective licensees. The Company also enters into fixed license fee arrangements. The terms of the royalty agreements generally require licensees to give notification of royalties due to the Company within 30 – 45 days of the end of the quarter during which their related sales occur. As the Company is unable to reliably estimate the licensees’ sales in any given quarter to determine the royalties due to it, the Company recognizes royalty revenues based on royalties reported by licensees and when all revenue recognition criteria are met. Certain royalties are based upon customer shipments or revenues and could be subject to change and may result in out of period adjustments. The Company recognizes fixed license fee revenue for licenses when earned under the terms of the agreements, which is generally recognized on a straight-line basis over the expected term of the license.

7

Table of Contents

Development, services, and other revenue — Development, services, and other revenue are composed of engineering services (engineering services and/or development contracts), and in limited cases, post contract customer support (“PCS”). Engineering services revenues are recognized under the proportional performance accounting method based on physical completion of the work to be performed or completed performance method. A provision for losses on contracts is made, if necessary, in the period in which the loss becomes probable and can be reasonably estimated. Revisions in estimates are reflected in the period in which the conditions become known. To date, such losses have not been significant. Revenue from PCS is typically recognized over the period of the ongoing obligation, which is generally consistent with the contractual term.

Multiple element arrangements — The Company enters into multiple element arrangements in which customers purchase time-based non-exclusive licenses that cannot be resold to others, which include a combination of software and/or IP licenses, engineering services, and in limited cases PCS. For arrangements that are software based and include software and engineering services, the services are generally not essential to the functionality of the software, and customers may purchase engineering services to facilitate the adoption of the Company’s technology, but they may also decide to use their own resources or appoint other engineering service organizations to perform these services. For arrangements that are in substance subscription arrangements, the entire arrangement fee is recognized ratably over the contract term, subject to any limitations related to extended payment terms. For arrangements involving upfront fees for services and royalties earned by the Company based on unit or sales volumes of the respective licensees, and the services are performed ratably over the arrangement or front-end loaded; the upfront fees are recognized ratably over the contract term and royalties based on unit or sales volume are recognized when they become fixed and determinable. As the Company is unable to reliably estimate the licensees’ sales in any given quarter to determine the royalties due to it, the Company recognizes per unit or sales volume driven royalty revenues based on royalties reported by licensees and when all revenue recognition criteria are met.

Product sales — The Company recognizes revenue from the sale of products and the license of associated software, if any, and expenses all related costs of products sold, once delivery has occurred and customer acceptance, if required, has been achieved. The Company typically grants to customers a warranty that guarantees the products will substantially conform to the Company’s current specifications for generally three to twelve months from the delivery date pursuant to the terms of the arrangement. Historically, warranty-related costs have not been significant.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2014-09 “Revenue from Contracts with Customers: Topic 606” (“ASU 2014-09”) which will supersede the current revenue recognition requirements in Topic 605, Revenue Recognition, and most industry-specific guidance. The core principle of ASU 2014-09 is that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. Further, the guidance requires improved disclosures to help users of financial statements better understand the nature, amount, timing, and uncertainty of revenue that is recognized. ASU 2014-09 is effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, and permits companies to either apply the requirements retrospectively to all prior periods presented, or apply the requirements in the year of adoption, through a cumulative adjustment. The Company is required to adopt ASU 2014-09 as of January 1, 2017, and is in the process of determining the method of adoption and evaluating the impact on its consolidated financial statements.

Cash Equivalents and Short-term Investments

The financial instruments of the Company measured at fair value on a recurring basis are cash equivalents and short-term investments.

8

Table of Contents

The Company’s fixed income available-for-sale securities consist of high quality, investment grade securities. The Company values these securities based on pricing from pricing vendors, who may use quoted prices in active markets for identical assets (Level 1) or inputs other than quoted prices that are observable either directly or indirectly (Level 2) in determining fair value.

The types of instruments valued based on quoted market prices in active markets include most money market securities. Such instruments are generally classified within Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy.

The types of instruments valued based on quoted prices in markets that are less active, broker or dealer quotations, or alternative pricing sources with reasonable levels of price transparency are generally classified within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy and include most U.S. treasury securities and most investment-grade corporate commercial paper.

The types of instruments valued based on unobservable inputs which reflect the reporting entity’s own assumptions or data that market participants would use in valuing an instrument are generally classified within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.

Financial instruments measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013 are classified based on the valuation technique in the table below:

The above table excludes $4.7 million of cash held in banks.

The above table excludes $4.1 million of cash held in banks.

9

Table of Contents

Short-term Investments

The contractual maturities of the Company’s available-for-sale securities on June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013 were all due within one year.

10

Table of Contents

Intangible amounts have been impacted by the Company’s change in accounting method for the treatment of external patent and trademark costs. The Company no longer capitalizes external legal, filing, and continuation or annuity fees associated with patent and trademark applications. Under the current method of accounting, these types of external patent-related costs are expensed as incurred and classified as general and administrative expenses in the Company’s condensed consolidated statement of income consistent with the treatment of internal legal expenses. Costs associated with purchased patents and other intangible assets continue to be capitalized as incurred. See Note 1 to the condensed consolidated financial statements for additional information regarding this change in accounting method.

11

Table of Contents

The Company amortizes its intangible assets related to purchased patents, over their estimated useful lives, generally 10 years from the purchase date. Amortization of intangibles was as follows:

The table below includes estimated remaining annual amortization expense for purchased patents as of June 30, 2014.

12

Table of Contents

Long-term deferred revenue consisted of the following:

Deferred revenue for Sony Computer Entertainment represents deferred license revenue where payments have been received in advance of revenue recognition.

Stock Options and Awards

The Company’s equity incentive program is a long-term retention program that is intended to attract, retain, and provide incentives for talented employees, consultants, officers, and directors and to align stockholder and employee interests. The Company may grant options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted stock units (“RSUs”), performance shares, performance units, and other stock-based or cash-based awards to employees, officers, directors, and consultants. Under this program, stock options may be granted at prices not less than the fair market value on the date of grant for stock options. These options generally vest over four years and expire from five to ten years from the date of grant. Restricted stock generally vests over one year. RSUs generally vest over three years. Awards granted other than an option or stock appreciation right reduce the common stock shares available for grant under the program by 1.75 shares for each share issued.

Employee Stock Purchase Plan

The Company has an Employee Stock Purchase Plan (“ESPP”). Under the ESPP, eligible employees may purchase common stock through payroll deductions at a purchase price of 85% of the lower of the fair market value of the Company’s stock at the beginning of the offering period or the purchase date. Participants may not purchase more than 2,000 shares in a six-month offering period or purchase stock having a value greater than $25,000 in any calendar year as measured at the beginning of the offering period. A total of 1,000,000 shares of common stock have been reserved for issuance under the ESPP. As of June 30, 2014, 537,110 shares had been purchased since the inception of the ESPP in 1999. Under ASC 718-10, the ESPP is considered a compensatory plan and the Company is required to recognize compensation cost related to the fair value of the award purchased under the ESPP. Shares purchased under the ESPP for the six months ended June 30, 2014 are listed below. Shares purchased under the ESPP for the six months ended June 30, 2013 are 16,003. The intrinsic value listed below is calculated as the difference between the market value on the date of purchase and the purchase price of the shares.

13

Table of Contents

Summary of Standard Stock Options

The following table sets forth the summary of standard option activity under the Company’s stock option plans for the six months ended June 30, 2014 and year ended December 31, 2013:

The aggregate intrinsic value is calculated as the difference between the exercise price of the underlying awards and the quoted price of the Company’s common stock for the options that were in-the-money.

Information regarding these standard stock options outstanding at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013 is summarized below:

14

Table of Contents

Summary of Market Condition Based Stock Options

In 2014 the Company began granting options that are subject to both time-based vesting and a market condition. For these options, the closing price of the Company stock must exceed a certain level for a number of trading days within a specified timeframe or the options will be cancelled before the seven year life of the options. The following table sets forth the summary of the market-based option activity under the Company’s stock option plans for the six months ended June 30, 2014:

The aggregate intrinsic value is calculated as the difference between the exercise price of the underlying awards and the quoted price of the Company’s common stock for the options that were in-the-money.

Information regarding these market condition based stock options outstanding at June 30, 2014 is summarized below:

15

Table of Contents

Summary of Restricted Stock Units

RSU activity for the six months ended June 30, 2014 and year ended December 31, 2013 was as follows:

Information regarding RSUs outstanding at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013 is summarized below:

16

Table of Contents

Summary of Restricted Stock Awards

Restricted stock award activity for the six months ended June 30, 2014 and year ended December 31, 2013 was as follows:

Stock Plan Assumptions

The assumptions used to value option grants under the Company’s stock plans were as follows:

17

Table of Contents

Compensation Costs

Total stock-based compensation recognized in the condensed consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income is as follows:

As of June 30, 2014, there was $8.3 million related to stock options, restricted stock awards, and RSUs of unrecognized compensation cost, adjusted for estimated forfeitures, granted to the Company’s employees and directors. This cost will be recognized over an estimated weighted-average period of approximately 3.12 years for standard options, 3.67 years for market condition based options, 1.75 years for RSUs, and 0.93 years for restricted stock awards. Total unrecognized compensation cost will be adjusted for future changes in estimated forfeitures.

Comprehensive Income

In February 2013, the FASB ratified ASU 2013-02 “Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Reporting of Amounts Reclassified Out of Comprehensive Income” (“ASU 2013-02”). ASU 2013-02 requires entities to disclose additional information about items reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income (“AOCI”) including AOCI balances by component and significant items reclassified out of AOCI. ASU 2013-02 was effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2012, and was applied prospectively.

18

Table of Contents

The changes in accumulated other comprehensive income are included in the table below.

Stock Repurchase Program

On November 1, 2007, the Company announced its Board of Directors’ authorized the repurchase of up to $50 million of the Company’s common stock (“Stock Repurchase Program”). The Company may repurchase its stock for cash in the open market in accordance with applicable securities laws. The timing of and amount of any stock repurchase will depend on share price, corporate and regulatory requirements, economic and market conditions, and other factors. The stock repurchase authorization has no expiration date, does not require the Company to repurchase a specific number of shares, and may be modified, suspended, or discontinued at any time.

During the three and six months ended June 30, 2014, the Company repurchased 10,875 and 616,294 shares for $109,000 and $7.0 million at an average cost of $10.03 and $11.34, respectively, net of transaction costs, through open market repurchases. These amounts are classified as treasury stock on the Company’s condensed consolidated balance sheet. The program currently remains available with approximately $12.4 million that may yet be purchased under it. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 there were no stock repurchases under this program.

Income tax provisions consisted of the following:

19

Table of Contents

The provision for income tax for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 resulted primarily from the Company’s federal and foreign tax recognized at statutory rates, adjusted for the tax impact of nondeductible permanent items including stock-based compensation and foreign withholding taxes. The income tax provision for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 is primarily as a result of foreign taxes and foreign withholding tax expense.

In July 2013, the FASB ratified ASU 2013-11, “Presenting an Unrecognized Tax Benefit (“UTB”) When a Net Operating Loss Carryforward Exists” (“ASU 2013-11”). ASU 2013-02 provides that an UTB, or a portion thereof, should be presented in the financial statements as a reduction to a deferred tax asset for a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit carryforward, except to the extent that a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit carryforward is not available at the reporting date to settle any additional income taxes that would result from disallowance of a tax position, or the tax law does not require the entity to use, and the entity does not intend to use, the deferred tax asset for such purpose, then the unrecognized tax benefit should be presented as a liability. ASU 2013-11 was effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2013, and may be applied retrospectively. The impact was not significant on the Company’s condensed consolidated results of operations and financial condition.

As of June 30, 2014, the Company had unrecognized tax benefits under ASC 740 “Income Taxes”, of approximately $1.7 million including interest of $69,000. The total amount of unrecognized tax benefits that would affect the Company’s effective tax rate, if recognized, was $268,000. There were no material changes in the amount of unrecognized tax benefits during the six months ended June 30, 2014. The Company expects to release reserves and record a tax benefit due to the expiration of applicable statutes of limitations during the next twelve months. The Company’s policy is to account for interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions as a component of income tax provision.

Net deferred income taxes were $35.8 million as of June 30, 2014, consisting primarily of federal net operating loss carryforwards and timing differences between book and tax. Because the Company had net operating loss and credit carryforwards, there are open statutes of limitations in which federal, state, and foreign taxing authorities may examine the Company’s tax returns for all years from 1998 through the current period.

The Company maintains a valuation allowance of $7.1 million against deferred tax assets, including state and certain foreign deferred tax assets. The Company has determined there is not sufficient evidence to support the release of the valuation allowance against these state and foreign deferred tax assets.

Basic net income per share is computed using the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period, excluding unvested restricted stock and RSUs. Diluted net income per share is based upon the weighted average common shares outstanding for the period plus dilutive potential shares including unvested restricted stock, RSUs, and stock options using the treasury stock method. The following is a reconciliation of the numerators and denominators used in computing basic and diluted net income per share:

20

Table of Contents

For the three months and six months ended June 30, 2014, options to purchase approximately 1.6 million and 1.5 million shares of common stock, respectively, with exercise prices greater than the average fair market value of the Company’s stock of $10.85 and $11.03 per share, respectively, were not included in the calculation because the effect would have been anti-dilutive.

For the three months and six months ended June 30, 2013, options to purchase approximately 1.1 million and 865,000 shares of common stock, respectively, with exercise prices greater than the average fair market value of the Company’s stock of $12.79 and $10.39 per share, respectively, were not included in the calculation because the effect would have been anti-dilutive.

In re Immersion Corporation Securities Litigation

In September and October 2009, various putative shareholder class action and derivative complaints were filed in federal and state court against the Company and certain current and former Company directors and officers.

On September 2, 2009, a securities class action complaint was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California against the Company and certain of its current and former directors and officers. Over the following five weeks, four additional class action complaints were filed. (One of these four actions was later voluntarily dismissed.) The securities class action complaints name the Company and certain current and former Company directors and officers as defendants and allege violations of federal securities laws based on the Company’s issuance of allegedly misleading financial statements. The various complaints assert claims covering the period from May 2007 through July 2009 and seek compensatory damages allegedly sustained by the purported class members.

21

Table of Contents

On December 21, 2009, these class actions were consolidated by the court as In Re Immersion Corporation Securities Litigation. On the same day, the court appointed a lead plaintiff and lead plaintiff’s counsel. Following the Company’s restatement of its financial statements, the lead plaintiff filed a consolidated complaint on April 9, 2010. Defendants moved to dismiss the action on June 15, 2010 and that motion was granted with leave to amend on March 11, 2011. The lead plaintiff filed an amended complaint on April 29, 2011. Defendants moved to dismiss the amended complaint on July 1, 2011. On December 16, 2011, the motion to dismiss was granted with prejudice and on December 19, 2011, judgment was entered in favor of defendants. On January 13, 2012, the plaintiffs filed a notice of appeal to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. In May 2012, plaintiff filed his opening appeals brief. On July 13, 2012, the Company filed its response brief. On September 4, 2012, plaintiff filed his reply. The Court heard oral argument on February 12, 2014 and took the matter under submission.

Other Contingencies

From time to time, the Company receives claims from third parties asserting that the Company’s technologies, or those of its licensees, infringe on the other parties’ IP rights. Management believes that these claims are without merit. Additionally, periodically, the Company is involved in routine legal matters and contractual disputes incidental to its normal operations. In management’s opinion, the resolution of such matters will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s condensed consolidated financial condition, results of operations, or liquidity.

In the normal course of business, the Company provides indemnifications of varying scope to customers against claims of IP infringement made by third parties arising from the use of the Company’s IP, technology, or products. Historically, costs related to these guarantees have not been significant, and the Company is unable to estimate the maximum potential impact of these guarantees on its future results of operations.

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q includes forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). The forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties. Forward-looking statements are identified by words such as “anticipates,” “believes,” “expects,” “intends,” “may,” “will,” and other similar expressions. However, these words are not the only way we identify forward-looking statements. In addition, any statements, which refer to expectations, projections, or other characterizations of future events, or circumstances, are forward-looking statements. Actual results could differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements as a result of a number of factors, including those set forth below in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and “Risk Factors”, those described elsewhere in this report, and those described in our other reports filed with the SEC. We caution you not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this report, and we undertake no obligation to update these forward-looking statements after the filing of this report. You are urged to review carefully and consider our various disclosures in this report and in our other reports publicly disclosed or filed with the SEC that attempt to advise you of the risks and factors that may affect our business.

OVERVIEW

We are a premier IP and technology licensing company focused on the creation, design, development, and licensing of patented haptic innovations and technologies that allow people to use their sense of touch more fully when operating a wide variety of digital devices. Our mission is to transform user experiences through groundbreaking innovations and technologies designed to provide unique and customizable touch feedback effects, excite the senses in games, videos and music, restore mechanical feel by providing

22

Table of Contents

intuitive and unmistakable confirmation, improve safety by overcoming distractions, and expand usability when audio and visual feedback are ineffective or inefficient. While we believe that our innovations are broadly applicable, we are currently focusing our marketing and business development activities on the following target markets: mobile communications and consumer electronics, automotive, gaming, commercial and industrial, and medical. We manage these market areas under one operating and reportable segment.

In our target markets, we license our software and IP to manufacturers for use in products sold under their own brand names. We and our wholly-owned subsidiaries hold more than 1,700 issued or pending patents in the U.S. and other countries, covering a wide range of digital technologies, including many of the ways in which touch-related technology can be incorporated into and between hardware products, systems software, application software and digital content.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES

Our discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon our condensed consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with GAAP. The preparation of these condensed consolidated financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues, expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. On an ongoing basis, we evaluate our estimates and assumptions, including those related to revenue recognition, stock-based compensation, short-term investments, patents and intangible assets, income taxes, contingencies, and litigation. We base our estimates and assumptions on historical experience and on various other factors that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates and assumptions.

We believe the following are our most critical accounting policies as they require our significant judgments and estimates in the preparation of our condensed consolidated financial statements:

Revenue Recognition

We recognize revenues in accordance with applicable accounting standards, including Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 605-10-S99, “Revenue Recognition” (“ASC 605-10-S99”); ASC 605-25, “Multiple Element Arrangements” (“ASC 605-25”); and ASC 985-605, “Software-Revenue Recognition” (“ASC 985-605”). We derive our revenues from three principal sources: royalty and license fees, development contract and service fees, and, previously, product sales. As described below, management judgments and estimates must be made and used in connection with the revenue recognized in any accounting period. Material differences may result in the amount and timing of our revenue for any period based on the judgments and estimates made by our management. Specifically, in connection with each transaction, we must evaluate whether: (i) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, (ii) delivery has occurred, (iii) the fee is fixed or determinable, and (iv) collectibility is probable. We apply these criteria as discussed below.

23

Table of Contents

Royalty and license revenue — We license our patents and software to customers in a variety of industries such as mobility, gaming, automotive, and medical devices. Certain of these are variable fee arrangements where the royalties earned by us are based on unit or sales volumes of the respective licensees. We also enter into fixed license fee arrangements. The terms of the royalty agreements generally require licensees to give notification of royalties due to us within 30 – 45 days of the end of the quarter during which their related sales occur. As we are unable to reliably estimate the licensees’ sales in any given quarter to determine the royalties due to us, we recognize royalty revenues based on royalties reported by licensees and when all revenue recognition criteria are met. Certain royalties are based upon customer shipments or revenues and could be subject to change and may result in out of period adjustments. We recognize fixed license fee revenue for licenses when earned under the terms of the agreements, which is generally recognized on a straight-line basis over the expected term of the license.

Development, services, and other revenue — Development, services, and other revenue are composed of engineering services (engineering services and/or development contracts), and in limited cases, PCS. Engineering services revenues are recognized under the proportional performance accounting method based on physical completion of the work to be performed or completed performance method. A provision for losses on contracts is made, if necessary, in the period in which the loss becomes probable and can be reasonably estimated. Revisions in estimates are reflected in the period in which the conditions become known. To date, such losses have not been significant. Revenue from PCS is typically recognized over the period of the ongoing obligation, which is generally consistent with the contractual term.

Multiple element arrangements — We enter into multiple element arrangements in which customers purchase time-based non-exclusive licenses that cannot be resold to others, which include a combination of software and/or IP licenses, engineering services, and in limited cases PCS. For arrangements that are software based and include software and engineering services, the services are generally not essential to the functionality of the software, and customers may purchase engineering services to facilitate the adoption of our technology, but they may also decide to use their own resources or appoint other engineering service organizations to perform these services. For arrangements that are in substance subscription arrangements, the entire arrangement fee is recognized ratably over the contract term, subject to any limitations related to extended payment terms. For arrangements involving upfront fees for services and royalties earned by us based on unit or sales volumes of the respective licensees, and the services are performed ratably over the arrangement or front-end loaded; the upfront fees are recognized ratably over the contract term and royalties based on unit or sales volume are recognized when they become fixed and determinable. As we are unable to reliably estimate the licensees’ sales in any given quarter to determine the royalties due to us, we recognize per unit or sales volume driven royalty revenues based on royalties reported by licensees and when all revenue recognition criteria are met.

Product sales — We recognize revenue from the sale of products and the license of associated software, if any, and expense all related costs of products sold, once delivery has occurred and customer acceptance, if required, has been achieved. We typically grant our customers a warranty which guarantees that our products will substantially conform to our current specifications for generally three to twelve months from the delivery date pursuant to the terms of the arrangement. Historically, warranty-related costs have not been significant.

Stock-based Compensation — Stock-based compensation cost is measured at the grant date based on the fair value of the award and is recognized as expense on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period, which is the vesting period.

Valuation and amortization methods — We use the Black-Scholes-Merton option pricing model (“Black-Scholes model”), single-option approach to determine the fair value of standard stock options and ESPP shares. All share-based payment awards are amortized on a straight-line basis over the requisite service periods of the awards, which are generally the vesting periods. Stock-based compensation expense

24

Table of Contents

recognized at fair value includes the impact of estimated forfeitures. We estimate future forfeitures at the date of grant and revise the estimates if necessary, in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from these estimates. The determination of the fair value of stock-based payment awards on the date of grant using an option-pricing model is affected by our stock price as well as assumptions regarding a number of complex and subjective variables. These variables include actual and projected employee stock option exercise behaviors that impact the expected term, our expected stock price volatility over the term of the awards, risk-free interest rate, and expected dividends.

We use the Monte-Carlo Simulation model to value our stock options with a market condition. Valuation techniques such as a Monte-Carlo Simulation model have been developed to value path-dependent awards. The Monte-Carlo Simulation model is a generally accepted statistical technique used, in this instance, to simulate a range of future stock prices for the Company.

The Black-Scholes model was developed for use in estimating the fair value of traded options that have no vesting restrictions and are fully transferable, characteristics not present in our option grants and ESPP shares. Existing valuation models, including the Black-Scholes model and the Monte-Carlo Simulation model, may not provide reliable measures of the fair values of our stock-based compensation. Consequently, there is a risk that our estimates of the fair values of our stock-based compensation awards on the grant dates may bear little resemblance to the actual values realized upon the exercise, expiration, early termination, or forfeiture of those stock-based payments in the future. Certain stock-based payments, such as employee stock options, may expire and be worthless or otherwise result in zero intrinsic value as compared to the fair values originally estimated on the grant date and reported in our financial statements. Alternatively, value may be realized from these instruments that are significantly higher than the fair values originally estimated on the grant date and reported in our financial statements. There currently is no market-based mechanism or other practical application to verify the reliability and accuracy of the estimates stemming from these valuation models, nor is there a means to compare and adjust the estimates to actual values.

If factors change and we employ different assumptions for estimating stock-based compensation expense in future periods, or if we decide to use a different valuation model, the future periods may differ significantly from what we have recorded in the current period and could materially affect our operating results.

See Note 8 to the condensed consolidated financial statements for further information regarding stock-based compensation.

Accounting for Income Taxes

We use the asset and liability method of accounting for income taxes. Under this method, income tax expense is recognized for the amount of taxes payable or refundable for the current year. In addition, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the expected future tax consequences of temporary differences between the financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities, and for operating losses and tax credit carryforwards. Valuation allowances are established when necessary to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount expected to be realized and are reversed at such time that realization is believed to be more likely than not.

Our judgments, assumptions, and estimates relative to the current provision for income tax take into account current tax laws, our interpretation of current tax laws, and possible outcomes of current and future audits conducted by foreign and domestic tax authorities. We have established reserves for income taxes to address potential exposures involving tax positions that could be challenged by tax authorities. Although we believe our judgments, assumptions, and estimates are reasonable, changes in tax laws or our interpretation of tax laws and any future tax audits could significantly impact the amounts provided for income taxes in our condensed consolidated financial statements.

Our assumptions, judgments, and estimates relative to the value of a deferred tax asset take into account predictions of the amount and category of future taxable income, such as income from operations or capital gains income. Actual operating results and the underlying amount and category of income in future years could render inaccurate our current assumptions, judgments, and estimates of recoverable net

25

Table of Contents

deferred tax assets. Any of the assumptions, judgments, and estimates mentioned above could cause our actual income tax obligations to differ from our estimates, thus materially impacting our financial position and results of operations.

See Note 10 to the condensed consolidated financial statements for further information concerning income taxes.

Short-term Investments

Our short-term investments consist primarily of U.S. treasury bills and government agency securities purchased with an original or remaining maturity of greater than 90 days on the date of purchase. We classify all debt securities with readily determinable market values as “available-for-sale”. Even though the stated maturity dates of these debt securities may be one year or more beyond the balance sheet date, we have classified all debt securities as short-term investments as they are available for current operations and reasonably expected to be realized in cash or sold within one year. These investments are carried at fair market value, and using the specific identification method, any unrealized gains and losses considered to be temporary in nature are reported as a separate component of other comprehensive income within stockholders’ equity.

For debt securities in an unrealized loss position, we are required to assess whether (i) we have the intent to sell the debt security or (ii) it is more likely than not that we will be required to sell the debt security before its anticipated recovery. If either of these conditions is met, an other-than-temporary impairment on the security must be recognized in earnings equal to the entire difference between its fair value and amortized cost basis.

For debt securities in an unrealized loss position which are deemed to be other-than-temporary where neither of the criteria in the paragraph above are present, the difference between the security’s then-current amortized cost basis and fair value is separated into (i) the amount of the impairment related to the credit loss (i.e., the credit loss component) and (ii) the amount of the impairment related to all other factors (i.e., the non-credit loss component). The credit loss component is recognized in earnings. The non-credit loss component is recognized in accumulated other comprehensive loss. The credit loss component is the excess of the amortized cost of the security over the best estimate of the present value of the cash flows expected to be collected from the debt security. The non-credit component is the residual amount of the other-than-temporary impairment.

When calculating the present value of expected cash flows to determine the credit loss component of the other-than-temporary impairment, we estimate the amount and timing of projected cash flows on a security-by-security basis. These calculations reflect our expectations of the performance of the underlying collateral and of the issuer to meet payment obligations as applicable. The expected cash flows are discounted using the effective interest rate of the security prior to any impairment. The amortized cost basis of a debt security is adjusted for credit losses recorded to earnings. The difference between the cash flows expected to be collected and the new cost basis is accreted to investment income over the remaining expected life of the security.

Further information about short-term investments may be found in Note 2 to the condensed consolidated financial statements.

Patents and Intangible Assets

Intangible assets with finite useful lives are amortized and intangible assets with indefinite lives are not amortized but rather are tested at least annually for impairment.

We have acquired patents and other intangible assets. In addition, we internally develop and license IP and software, and when possible, we protect our IP and software with patents and trademarks. During the fourth quarter 2013, we changed our method of accounting for external patent-related costs associated with our internally developed patents and trademarks. Prior to the change we capitalized the external legal, filing, and continuation or annuity fees associated with patent and trademark applications. These costs were amortized on a straight-line basis over their estimated economic useful lives which were generally 10 years from the date of issuance. Under the current method of accounting, external patent-related costs are expensed as incurred and classified as general and administrative expenses in our condensed consolidated

26

Table of Contents

statement of income, consistent with the classification of internal legal costs associated with internally developed patents and trademarks. Costs associated with the purchase of patents continue to be capitalized as before. These costs are amortized utilizing the straight-line method, which approximates the pattern of consumption over the estimated useful lives of the respective assets, generally ten years. See Note 1 to the condensed consolidated financial statements for additional information regarding this change in accounting method.

The above listing is not intended to be a comprehensive list of all of our accounting policies. In many cases, the accounting treatment of a particular transaction is specifically dictated by GAAP, with no need for management’s judgment in its application. There are also areas in which management’s judgment in selecting any available alternative would not produce a materially different result.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE THREE MONTHS AND SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2014 AND 2013

The following discussion and analysis includes our results of operations for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013.

Overview

Total revenue increased by 16% for the three months ended June 30, 2014 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2013, driven by a 16% increase in royalty and license revenue. The increase in royalty and license revenue for the three month period was primarily due to increased revenue from our gaming and mobility licensees along with increases from our medical and automotive licensees as well. Total revenue increased by 13% for the six months ended June 30, 2014 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2013 driven by a 13% increase in royalty and license revenue. The increase in royalty and license revenue for the six month period was primarily due to increased revenue from our gaming licensees along with increases from our medical and automotive licensees; partially offset by a decrease in revenue from our mobility licensees, mainly due to decreased revenue of approximately $2 million resulting from an overlapping receipt of both tail revenue and new revenue under an agreement that expired and was subsequently renewed in the three months ended March 2013 that did not recur in 2014.

Our net income was $169,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2014 as compared to net income of $466,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2013. The decrease in net income was primarily due to increased operating expenses of $2.0 million mainly due to higher general and administrative expenses driven by increased litigation and other legal expenses, partially offset by increased gross profit of $1.7 million resulting primarily from additional royalty and license revenue. Sales and marketing and research and development expenses also contributed to the operating expense increase compared to the prior year three month period. Our net income was $2.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2014 as compared to a net income of $2.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013. The decrease in net income was primarily due to a higher provision for income taxes of $1.1 million and increased operating expenses of $2.3 million mainly due to increased sales and marketing expenses, research and development expenses, and general and administrative expenses primarily due to increased compensation, benefits, and other related costs; partially offset by increased gross profit of $3.3 million resulting primarily from additional royalty and license revenue.

In 2014, we expect royalty and license revenue, mainly from our mobility and gaming lines of business, to be the major component of our revenue as our technology continues to be included in more of our licensees’ products, and as we continue to execute our patent licensing program relating to Basic Haptics. IP litigation may cause us to expend significant financial resources in the future and may have an adverse effect on the results of our operations. Additionally, our success could be limited by various factors, including global economic conditions, the timely release of our new products and our licensees’ products, continued market acceptance of our products and technology, and the introduction of new products by existing or new competitors. For a further discussion of these and other risk factors, see Part II, Item 1A – “Risk Factors.”

27

Table of Contents

Three Months Ended June 30, 2014 Compared to Three Months Ended June 30, 2013

Royalty and license revenue — Royalty and license revenue is composed of royalties earned on sales by our licensees and license fees charged for our IP. The increase in royalty and license revenue for the three months ended June 30, 2014 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2013 was primarily due to increases in royalty and license revenue from our mobility and gaming licensees and to a lesser extent increases from our automotive and medical licensees.

Variable royalty revenue based on shipping volumes and per unit prices increased to $3.9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2014 from $3.8 million for the three months ended June 30, 2013, due to an increased level of sales by our mobility and automotive customers, partially offset by a decreased level of sales by our gaming and medical customers. Fixed payment license revenue increased to $7.7 million for the three months ended June 30, 2014 from $6.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2013, due to the increased license fees from gaming, mobility and medical licensees.

Royalty and license revenue from gaming customers increased by 23%, primarily due to the sale of gaming console products that have incorporated our technology and which were released to the market in the fourth quarter of 2013, including the Sony PlayStation 4. Revenue from gaming customers can fluctuate based upon consumer gaming preferences, the timing of introductions of new gaming console systems, and the timing of new products from third party peripheral makers that are our licensees.

Royalty and license revenue from mobility customers increased by 15%, primarily due to increased revenue from the new licensees in China and the U.S. from whom we did not receive any revenue in the year-ago period. Partially offsetting this increase was a decrease in revenue from our mobility customers in Japan due to a consolidation in the market. We anticipate that the mobility line of business will continue to be of primary importance as mobile device manufacturers continue to recognize the value of our IP and technology and as we expand our presence in Asia.

Royalty and license revenue from medical customers increased by 14%, primarily due to increased license fees from licensees.

28

Table of Contents

Royalty and license revenue from automotive customers increased by 9%, due to our technology being incorporated in an increased volume of vehicles sold by our licensees.

We expect royalty and license revenue to be the major component of our future revenue as our technology continues to be included in more products and as we continue our efforts to monetize our IP. We typically experience seasonally higher revenue from our gaming and mobility customers due to the reporting of holiday sales in the first calendar quarter compared to other calendar quarters. As we have entered into license agreements that include recurring fixed payments to us, we expect that the effect of seasonality may be less in 2014 and in future years.

Product sales — Product sales decreased as we discontinued selling all products as of December 31, 2013. We will have no future product sales and will focus on licensing our software and patents going forward.

Development, services, and other revenue — Development, services, and other revenue is composed of primarily of development work, implementation support, and other contract engineering services provided to customers. Development, services, and other revenue increased mainly due to an increase in ongoing engineering services for new and legacy mobility customers. We continue to focus our engineering resources on development efforts that leverage our existing sales and channel distribution capabilities. Accordingly, we do not expect development, services, and other revenue to be a significant part of total revenues in the future.

We categorize our geographic information into three major regions: North America, Europe and Asia. In the three months ended June 30, 2014, revenue generated in North America, Europe and Asia represented 31%, 2% and 67% of total revenue, respectively, compared to 21%, 8% and 71% of total revenues, respectively, for the three months ended June 30, 2013. The shift in revenues among regions was mainly due to an increase in royalty and license revenue in North America primarily due to an increase from our gaming and mobility licensees. This was offset by a decrease in royalty and license revenue in Europe which was primarily due to decreased revenue from our gaming licensees. The increase in royalty and license revenue in Asia from our gaming and mobility licensees was relatively less than the increase in North America, resulting in a decrease in the percentage of revenue attributed to Asia as a part of total revenue.

Six Months Ended June 30, 2014 Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2013

Royalty and license revenue — The increase in royalty and license revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2014 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2013 was primarily due to increased revenue from our gaming licensees and to a lesser extent from our medical and automotive licensees partially offset by a decrease in revenue from our mobility licensees.

Variable royalty revenue based on shipping volumes and per unit prices increased to $11.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2014 from $11.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013, due to an increased level of sales by our gaming licensees, partially offset by decreased revenue of approximately $2 million resulting from an overlapping receipt of both tail revenue and new revenue under an agreement that expired and was subsequently renewed in the first six months of 2013 that did not recur in 2014. Fixed payment license increased to $15.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2014 from $12.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013, due to increased fees from gaming, mobility and medical licensees.

Royalty and license revenue from gaming customers increased by 63%, primarily due to the sale of new gaming console products that have incorporated our technology which were released to the market in the fourth quarter of 2013, including the Sony PlayStation 4. Revenue from gaming customers can fluctuate based upon consumer gaming preferences, the timing of introductions of new gaming console systems, and the timing of new products from third party peripheral makers that are our licensees.

Royalty and license revenue from medical customers increased by 26%, primarily due to an increased volume of units sold by these customers and increased fees from licensees.

29

Table of Contents

Royalty and license revenue from automotive customers increased by 16%, due to our technology being incorporated in an increased volume of vehicles sold by our licensees.

Royalty and license revenue from mobility customers decreased by 4%, primarily due to decreased revenue of approximately $2 million resulting from an overlapping receipt of both tail revenue and new revenue under an agreement that expired and was subsequently renewed in the six months ended June 2013 that did not recur in 2014. Partially offsetting this decrease was additional revenue from new customer contracts in China and the U.S.

Product sales — Product sales decreased as we discontinued selling all products as of December 31, 2013. We will have no future product sales and will focus on licensing our software and patents going forward.

Development, services, and other revenue — Development, services, and other revenue increased mainly due to an increase in ongoing engineering services for new and legacy mobility customers. We continue to focus our engineering resources on development efforts that leverage our existing sales and channel distribution capabilities. Accordingly, we do not expect development, services, and other revenue to be a significant part of total revenues in the future.

We categorize our geographic information into three major regions: North America, Europe and Asia. In the six months ended June 30, 2014, revenue generated in North America, Europe and Asia represented 33%, 4% and 63% of total revenues, respectively, compared to 26%, 4% and 70% of total revenues, respectively, for the six months ended June 30, 2013. The shift in revenues among regions was mainly due to an increase in royalty and license revenue in North America offset by a slight decrease in royalty and license revenue in Europe. The increase in royalty and license revenue in North America was primarily due to an increase from our gaming and mobility licensees. The decrease in royalty and license revenue from Europe was primarily due to decreased revenue from our gaming licensees; partially offset by increased revenue from our automobile licensees. The increase in royalty and license revenue in Asia from our gaming and mobility licensees was relatively less than the increase in North America, resulting in a decrease in the percentage of revenue attributed to Asia as a part of total revenue.

Cost of Revenues — Our cost of revenues consists primarily of labor related costs for development, services, and other revenue; as well as direct materials, contract manufacturing, and other overhead costs for product sales. The discontinuation of all product sales as of December 31, 2013 was the major contributor to the reduction of cost of revenues for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 as compared to the three and six months ended 2013. Future costs of revenues will be limited to costs for development, services, and other revenue.

30

Table of Contents