Imunon, Inc. - Quarter Report: 2006 September (Form 10-Q)

Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2006

or

Commission file number 000-14242

CELSION CORPORATION

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)

10220-L Old Columbia Road, Columbia, Maryland 21046-2364

(Address of Principal Executive Offices) (Zip Code)

(410) 290-5390

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large Accelerated filer:  ¨    Accelerated filer:  ¨    Non-accelerated filer:  x

Indicate by checkmark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes  ¨    No  x

As of November 8, 2006 the Registrant had outstanding 10,785,658 shares of Common Stock, $.01 par value.

Table of Contents

EXHIBITS

-2-

Table of Contents

PART I

FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements and Notes.

Index to Financial Statements

-3-

Table of Contents

CELSION CORPORATION

BALANCE SHEETS

September 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005

ASSETS

-4-

Table of Contents

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ (DEFICIT) EQUITY

See accompanying notes

-5-

Table of Contents

CELSION CORPORATION

STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (unaudited)

See accompanying notes

-6-

Table of Contents

CELSION CORPORATION

STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (unaudited)

-7-

Table of Contents

CELSION CORPORATION

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(UNAUDITED)

For the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2006 and 2005

Note 1. Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited condensed financial statements of Celsion Corporation (which we sometimes refer to as Celsion, the Company, we, us or our) have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring accruals considered necessary for a fair presentation, have been included in the accompanying unaudited financial statements. Operating results for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2006 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for any other interim period(s) or for any full year. For further information, refer to the financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005.

Note 2. Common Stock Outstanding and Per Share Information

For the three month and nine month periods ended September 30, 2006 and September 30, 2005, per share data is based on the weighted average number of shares of common stock, par value $0.01 per share (Common Stock), outstanding during the respective periods. Outstanding warrants and options that can be converted into Common Stock and non-vested common stock are not included, as their effect is anti-dilutive. On February 27, 2006 the Company affected a 15:1 reverse stock split and the 2005 share data has been adjusted accordingly. The total number of outstanding warrants and options for the periods ended September 30, 2006 and September 30, 2005 were 2,230,114 and 2,282,190 respectively. The number of outstanding non-vested common stock for the periods ended September 30, 2006 and September 30, 2005 were 45,854 and none respectively.

Note 3. New Accounting Pronouncements

In November 2004, the Financial Accounting Standard Board (FASB) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 151, Inventory Costs. SFAS No. 151 amends Accounting Research Bulletin No. 43, Chapter 4, to clarify that abnormal amounts of idle facility expense, freight, handling costs and wasted materials (spoilage) should be recognized as current-period charges. In addition, SFAS No. 151 requires that allocation of fixed production overhead to inventory be based on the normal capacity of the production facilities. The Company was required to adopt SFAS No. 151 beginning January 1, 2006. SFAS No. 151 has not had a material impact on the Company’s results of operations, financial position and cash flow.

On December 16, 2004 the FASB issued SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004), “Share-Based Payment” (“SFAS 123(R)”), which is a revision of SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-based Compensation.” SFAS 123(R) supersedes APB Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees” and amends SFAS No. 95, “Statement of Cash Flows.” Generally, the approach in SFAS 123(R) is similar to the approach described in SFAS 123. However, SFAS 123(R) requires all share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options, to be recognized in the determination of net income based on their fair values. The Company adopted SFAS 123(R) effective January 1, 2006.

SFAS 123(R) permits public companies to adopt its requirements using one of two methods: (1) a “modified prospective” approach or (2) a “modified retrospective” approach. Under the modified

-8-

Table of Contents

prospective approach, compensation cost is recognized beginning with the effective date based on (a) the requirements of SFAS 123(R) for all share based payments granted after the effective date and (b) the requirements of SFAS 123(R) for all awards granted to employees prior to the effective date of SFAS 123(R) that remain unvested on the effective date. The modified retrospective approach includes the requirements of the modified prospective approach, but also permits entities to restate, based on the amounts previously recognized under SFAS 123 for purposes of pro forma disclosures, either all prior periods presented or prior interim periods of the year of adoption. The Company adopted the modified prospective approach. As permitted by SFAS 123, the Company accounted for share-based payments to employees using APB Opinion No. 25’s intrinsic value method, and, as such, generally recognized no compensation cost for employee stock options in fiscal 2005. Accordingly, the adoption of the fair value method will have a significant impact on our results of operations, although it will have no impact on our overall financial position.

The effects of the adoption of SFAS 123(R) on the Company’s results of operations and financial position are dependent upon a number of factors, including the number of employee stock options outstanding and unvested, the number of stock-based awards which may be granted in the future, the life and vesting features of stock-based awards which may be granted in the future, the future market value and volatility of the Company’s stock, movements in the risk free rate of interest, award exercise and forfeiture patterns, and the valuation model used to estimate the fair value of each award. In addition, the Company intends to utilize non-vested stock units as a component of its ongoing employee incentive-based compensation plan. These awards generally are recorded at fair value, equal to the quoted market price of the Company’s common stock on the date of issuance, and this amount is subsequently amortized ratably over the vesting period of the shares of non-vested stock held by the employee. The Company estimates the adoption of SFAS 123(R) will increase compensation expense in the range of $1.0 to $1.75 million for the year ending December 31, 2006, of which $1.0 million represents estimated compensation expense for options issued and outstanding at December 31, 2005 and the remainder represents estimated compensation expense for anticipated option issuances. The fair value accounting of stock options resulted in an expense for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 of $254,730 and $812,013 for the nine months ended September 30, 2006.

SFAS 123(R) also requires the benefits of tax deductions in excess of recognized compensation cost to be reported as a financing cash flow, rather than as an operating cash flow. Because the Company does not recognize the benefit of tax deductions in excess of recognized compensation cost due to its net operating loss position, it is expected that this change will have no impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

Note 4. Fair Value Accounting for Stock Plans

Employee Stock Options

The Company has long-term compensation plans that permit the granting of incentive awards in the form of stock options. Generally, the terms of these plans require that the exercise price of the options may not be less than the fair market value of Celsion’s Common Stock on the date the options are granted. Options generally vest over various time frames or upon milestone accomplishments. Some vest immediately. Others vest over a period between one and five years. The options generally expire ten years from the date of the grant.

2001 Stock Option Plan

The purpose of the 2001 Plan is to promote long-term growth and profitability of Celsion Corporation by providing key associates with incentives to improve stockholder value and to contribute to the growth and financial success of Celsion and to enable the company to attract, retain and reward the best available persons for positions of substantial responsibility. The 2001 Plan permitted the granting of stock options

-9-

Table of Contents

(including nonqualified stock options and incentive stock options qualifying under Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code) and stock appreciation rights or any combination of the foregoing. During the year that ended December 31, 2005, 38,920 options were canceled or expired. During the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2006, 15,557 and 21,336 options were canceled or expired, respectively. All canceled and expired options under the 2001 Plan become available for issue under the 2004 Plan.

2004 Stock Incentive Plan

The purpose of the 2004 Plan is to promote the long-term growth and financial success of the Company and enable the Company to attract, retain and reward the best available persons for positions of substantial responsibility. The 2004 Plan permits the granting of awards in the form of incentive stock options, restricted stock, restricted stock units, stock appreciation rights, phantom stock, and performance awards, or in any combination of the foregoing. On September 30, 2006 options to purchase 471,185 shares were available from the 737,501 authorized under the 2004 Plan.

During the quarter ended March 31, 2006 the Company issued 48,223 shares of non-vested common stock at a market price of $4.08. Since the grant of non-vested common stock relates to future service, the total compensation expense of $196,799 will be recognized ratably over the service period. Since the initial issue some 2,369 share have been cancelled leaving a balance of 45,854 shares. The expense recognized for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 was $110,424.

Options Issued to Non-Employees for Services

The Company enters into agreements with consultants in which the consultants receive stock options in exchange for services. Generally, the terms of these plans require that the exercise price of the options may not be less than the fair market value of Celsion’s Common Stock on the date the options are granted. Options generally vest over various time frames or upon milestone accomplishments. Some vest immediately. Others vest over a period between one and five years. The options generally expire ten years from the date of the grant. There were no options granted to non-employees for the period ended September 30, 2006.

A summary of the Company’s Common Stock option activity and related information is as follows:

-10-

Table of Contents

Following is additional information with respect to options outstanding at September 30, 2006:

For all of the Company’s stock-based compensation plans, the fair value of each grant was estimated at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. Black-Scholes utilizes assumptions related to volatility, the risk-free interest rate, the dividend yield and employee exercise behavior. Expected volatilities utilized in the model are based on historical volatility of the Company’s stock price. The risk free interest rate is derived from values assigned to U.S. Treasury strips as published in the Wall Street Journal in effect at the time of grant. The model incorporates exercise, pre-vesting and post-vesting forfeiture assumptions based on analysis of historical data. The expected life of the fiscal 2006 grants was generated using the simplified method as allowed under Securities and Exchange Commission Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 107.

The Company has long-term compensation plans that permit the granting of incentive awards in the form of stock options. Prior to fiscal 2006, the Company applied the intrinsic value method as outlined in the APB Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees,” and related interpretations in accounting for stock options granted. No compensation expense was recognized in the accompanying consolidated financial statements of earnings prior to fiscal 2006. The following table illustrates the effect on net income and earnings per share for periods presented prior to fiscal 2006, if the Company had applied the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS 123 to its stock-based employee plans.

-11-

Table of Contents

Note 5. Note Receivable and Note Receivable Interest

On January 16, 2006, Celsion contributed to its wholly-owned subsidiary, Celsion (Canada) Limited (“Canada”), all of the Company’s assets relating to its Adaptive Phased Array (“APA”) technology for the treatment of breast cancer. Also on that date, the Company entered into a Stock Purchase Agreement with the Company’s founder and former officer and director, Dr. Augustine Y. Cheung, whereby the Company sold to Dr. Cheung all of the issued and outstanding shares of capital stock of Canada. The Company also agreed to provide certain services to Canada pursuant to a Transition Services Agreement between the Company and Canada.

Under the Stock Purchase Agreement, all of the capital stock of Canada was transferred to Dr. Cheung in exchange for a promissory note made by Dr. Cheung in favor of the Company in the principal amount of $1,500,000 to be paid over a period of up to 78 months and secured by a pledge of 100,536 shares of Celsion common stock owned by Dr. Cheung and his wife and the commitment of Canada to pay a 5 percent royalty on the net sales of certain products sold by and patent royalties received by Canada and its successors and assigns, of up to $18,500,000.

The terms of the note receivable only specify an interest charge in the event that scheduled payments are in arrears. The value of the $1,500,000 note was therefore discounted at the prime rate in effect January 16, 2006 (7.25%) plus 1.0%, or 8.25%, and the calculated net present value of $1,146,428 was recorded in the financial statements. During the three months ended June 30, 2006 Celsion adjusted the note reducing the net present value from $1,146,428 to $1,049,509 and recording a charge against net income of $96,919. This reduction reflects Dr. Cheung’s agreement to forgo a bonus payment due under his employment contract in respect to his employment for 2005. Interest for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 was recorded in the amount of $60,502. The next scheduled payment is due June 30, 2008 with additional payments due every six months thereafter through December 31, 2010.

-12-

Table of Contents

Note 6: Loan Receivable

In conjunction with the sale of Celsion (Canada) Limited, a Transition Services Agreement was entered into whereby Celsion sublet space in the Company’s offices for use by Canada to carry on its business, for a period of up to six (6) months from the date of the agreement; provided administrative support services as needed in the operation of Canada’s business for the period of the sublease and advanced funds to pay salary and health and dental insurance of each of certain employees of Canada and, in addition, expenses reasonably incurred in connection with the operation of Canada’s business up to $100,000 for the shorter of the period ending June 30, 2006 or the date of closing by Canada of a transaction involving the merger of Canada into a newly created Canadian Capital Pool Company and a simultaneous funding through a private placement of shares under terms approved by the Toronto Stock Exchange (the “Canada Transaction”). The Canada Transaction did not close by June 30, 2006. Based on discussions with Canada management, Celsion management established that diligent efforts were being made by Canada management to close the Canada Transaction on a timely basis and agreed to extend the due date for repayment of the loan to the earlier of the closing of the Canada Transaction or December 31. 2006. Within ten days after the closing of the Canada Transaction, Canada will pay the Company all amounts due under the Transition Services Agreement. If Canada fails to close the Canada Transaction, Celsion has the right to sell the 100,536 shares of stock being held as collateral.

The Transition Services Agreement was amended on March 28, 2006 to advance Celsion (Canada) Limited an additional $200,000 to fund reasonable operating expenses. This additional advance is repayable under the same terms as the Transition Services Agreement. However, in the event of default, Dr. Cheung will forgo payments due under a consulting agreement between Celsion Corporation and Dr. Cheung dated January 16, 2006. The cumulative balance advanced under the Transition Services Agreement, as amended, at September 30, 2006 was $571,200.

Note 7. Investment in Celsion China, Ltd.

On December 15, 2003 the Company announced the formation of a joint venture with Asia Pacific Life Science Group, Ltd., a group of Hong Kong-based investors, to develop our technologies and distribute our products in Greater China. Celsion acquired 45.65% of the equity of Celsion China Ltd for $200,000 on February 5, 2004.

On January 12, 2006 Celsion acquired a further 25.65% of the equity of Celsion China Ltd. from Asia Pacific Life Science Group, Ltd for $25,000 increasing Celsion’s total equity position to 71.3%.

An additional cash advance in the amount of $84,123 in the form of a loan was made to Celsion China, Ltd. on January 27, 2006.

Celsion Corporation terminated its interest in Celsion China Ltd. on May 9, 2006, and has recorded the loan write-off, other receivable write-off and final dissolution expenses related to Celsion China, Ltd. as a loss on investment in Celsion China Ltd.

-13-

Table of Contents

The financial records of Celsion China, Ltd. as of December 31, 2005 reflected the following:

Celsion Corporation’s balance sheet at December 31, 2005 reflects the investment in Celsion China in the account entitled “Investment in Celsion China, Ltd.,” the components of which are as follows:

Note 8. Licensing Agreement

The Distribution Agreement dated January 21, 2003 between Celsion Corporation and Boston Scientific Corporation (BSC or Boston Scientific) entitled Celsion to a $4,000,000 licensing fee, effective upon the occurrence of certain events, in return for granting BSC a seven-year, royalty-free, exclusive right to market, distribute, import, export, use, sell and offer to sell Celsion’s Prolieve Thermodilatation^® system worldwide, with the exception of China, Taiwan, Hong Kong, Macao, Mexico and Central and South America. All of the conditions were met, and we received cash from BSC during the quarter ended March 31, 2004 in the amount of $2,000,000. The remaining $2,000,000 was placed in an escrow account, pursuant to the terms of the Distribution Agreement. The Company is recognizing the licensing fee, at the rate of approximately $47,600 per month, over the seven-year term of the Distribution Agreement.

The escrow is designed to provide available funds for payment in the event of any legal expenses, settlements, license fees, royalties, damages or judgments incurred by Celsion or Boston Scientific in connection with any patent litigation related to alleged infringement of third party patents occurring during the 36-month term of the escrow. The escrow is held in an interest-bearing account, with interest accruing for the benefit of Celsion, but subject to the escrow. All amounts held in the account at the end of the term of the escrow are payable to Celsion. However, Celsion bears full responsibility for payment of claims subject to the escrow in excess of available escrowed funds.

-14-

Table of Contents

Note 9. Inventory

Inventory is comprised of Prolieve Thermodilatation system control units, parts inventory and associated disposable treatment kits. Inventory is stated at the lower of cost or market. Inventory on hand at September 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005 was as follows:

Note 10. Loan Payable

On August 8, 2005 we entered into a loan agreement with BSC whereby BSC will lend the Company up to $15 million. The loan, which has a term expiring on February 20, 2009 and bears interest at a rate of prime plus 1 percent, has been disbursed in three installments. The first installment, in the amount of $6 million, was disbursed on August 17, 2005. The second installment, in the amount of $4.5 million, was disbursed on February 2, 2006. The third installment, in the amount of $4.5 million, was disbursed on July 28, 2006. Interest is due on the first to occur of:

The Company has the right to prepay the loan at any time without penalty.

The principal balance of this loan, together with all accrued and unpaid interest, is due and payable in full on February 29, 2009. At September 30, 2006 the accrued and unpaid interest to date was $923,115.

Note 11. Treasury Stock

On February 27, 2006, the Company affected a 15:1 reverse stock split of the Company’s issued and outstanding shares of common stock (the “Common Stock”). As of that date, each fifteen shares of the Company’s issued and outstanding shares of Common Stock were automatically combined, converted and changed into one share of Common Stock of the Company (the “Reverse Split”). No fractional shares were issued as a result of the Reverse Split. Instead, the Company paid cash in lieu of fractional shares based on the average closing price of the Company’s Common Stock for the five trading days prior to the effective date of the Reverse Split. Unless otherwise noted herein, all share numbers and per share financial information in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q is provided on a post-reverse stock split basis.

-15-

Table of Contents

Note 12. Contingencies

Purchase Commitment

Sanmina-SCI (“Sanmina”) and Celsion entered into a Medical Product Manufacturing Services Agreement on April 2, 2003 for the production of the Company’s Prolieve Thermodilatation control units. It is stipulated in this agreement that Celsion may from time to time require Sanmina to acquire component inventories in excess of current demand. Any such inventory of components purchased and held by Sanmina will be designated as “excess” inventory; Celsion is responsible to reimburse Sanmina for the delivered cost of those components. As of September 30, 2006 Celsion and Sanmina have valued the excess components at $255,418. In lieu of payment in full, Celsion, beginning October 1, 2005, is paying a 1.5% monthly inventory carrying charge. The amount paid in the nine months ended September 30, 2006 was $38,690.

Legal Costs

On April 27, 2006 American Medical Systems, Inc. and AMS Research Corporation (together referred to as “AMS”) filed suit in the U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota alleging infringement of two patents of AMS resulting from our manufacture, use and sale of the Prolieve Thermodilatation system. The suit is captioned American Medical Systems, Inc. and AMS Research Corporation vs. Celsion Corporation, Case no. 0:06-cv-01606-JMR-FLN. The complaint seeks injunctive relief against the alleged infringement, unspecified trebled damages, plaintiff costs, expenses and attorney fees. Celsion believes the suit is without merit and will defend its case vigorously.

On September 1, 2006 AMS amended the compliant alleging that Prolieve infringes two additional AMS patents.

The U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota dismissed the patent infringement lawsuit filed by AMS against Celsion Corporation for lack of personal jurisdiction on September 27, 2006. A new suit was filed on September 28, 2006 against Celsion by AMS in the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware, where both companies are incorporated, alleging that Celsion’s Prolieve Thermodilatation System infringes the patents previously asserted in the Minnesota suit.

Under the licensing agreement with Boston Scientific an escrow account was established during March 2004. The escrow is designed to provide available funds for payment in the event of any legal expenses, settlements, license fees, royalties, damages or judgments incurred by Celsion or Boston Scientific in connection with any patent litigation related to alleged infringement of third party patents occurring during the 36-month term of the escrow. The escrow is held in an interest-bearing account, with interest accruing for the benefit of Celsion, but subject to the escrow. All amounts held in the escrow account at the end of the term (March 2007) are payable to Celsion. However, Celsion bears full responsibility for payment of claims in excess of available escrowed funds.

Legal expenses in the amount of $543,365 have been incurred for the nine months ended September 30, 2006. The Company and Boston Scientific have requested and received disbursements in the amount of $115,108 and $20,865, respectively. Celsion intends to request disbursement for additional costs, as they become due.

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

Forward-Looking Statements

Statements and terms such as “expect”, “anticipate”, “estimate”, “plan”, “believe” and words of similar import regarding the Company’s expectations as to the development and effectiveness of its technologies, the potential demand for our products, and other aspects of our present and future business operations,

-16-

Table of Contents

constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Although we believe that our expectations are based on reasonable assumptions within the bounds of our knowledge of our industry, business and operations, we cannot guarantee that actual results will not differ materially from our expectations. In evaluating such forward-looking statements, readers should specifically consider the various factors contained in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005 including, without limitation: the impact of potentially significant expenses to defend the AMS patent infringement lawsuit described in Part II, Item 1 of this Quarterly Report; the possibility that our common stock could be delisted from The American Stock Exchange as a result of the failure to comply with applicable listing standards; unforeseen changes in the course of research and development activities and in clinical trials; possible changes in cost and timing of development and testing, capital structure, and other financial items; changes in approaches to medical treatment; introduction of new products by others; possible acquisitions of other technologies, assets or businesses; and possible actions by customers, suppliers, competitors and regulatory authorities. These and other risks and uncertainties could cause actual results to differ materially from those indicated by such forward-looking statements, including those set forth in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Risk Factors” contained in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005.

The discussion of risks and uncertainties set forth in this Report and in our most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K as well as in other filings with the SEC, is not necessarily a complete or exhaustive list of all risks facing the Company at any particular point in time. We operate in a highly competitive, highly regulated and rapidly changing environment and our business is in a state of evolution. Therefore, it is likely that new risks will emerge, and that the nature and elements of existing risks will change, over time. It is not possible for management to predict all such risk factors or changes therein, or to assess either the impact of all such risk factors on our business or the extent to which any individual risk factor, combination of factors, or new or altered factors, may cause results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statement. We disclaim any obligation to revise or update any forward-looking statement that may be made from time to time by us or on our behalf.

Overview

Celsion is a biotechnology company dedicated to furthering the development and commercialization of oncology drugs including tumor-targeting treatments using focused heat energy in combination with heat activated drug delivery. In 1989, we obtained premarketing approval (PMA) from the FDA to use our microwave-based Microfocus 1000 heat therapy system on surface and subsurface tumors in conjunction with radiation therapy. We marketed this system until 1995. From 1995 until early in 2004 we engaged in research and development of new treatment systems. On February 19, 2004, we obtained a PMA for our Prolieve Thermodilatation system for the treatment of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH) and thereafter our marketing partner, Boston Scientific, commenced commercial sales of the Prolieve system. In addition, we are engaged in the development of treatment systems using a combination of heat and ThermoDox^TM , our proprietary heat activated liposomal encapsulation of doxorubicin, for the treatment of liver cancer and breast cancer.

-17-

Table of Contents

Development pipeline

Our pipeline presently consists of the following products, in the indicated stages of development:

We anticipate that, in the near term (up to 12 months), the source of our revenues will be from sales of our Prolieve^® system and related disposables. In the longer term (beyond 12 months), we expect to seek to develop new revenue streams from our current work with Duke University in targeted drug delivery systems. We anticipate that revenues will come from the licensing of these technologies to pharmaceutical manufacturers and from eventual sales to major institutional health care providers who would employ these technologies to deliver drug regimens throughout the body or from the sale of one or more of these technologies.

From 1995 to 2004, we generated only minimal revenues and have funded our operations primarily through private placements of our equity securities. During 2004, following FDA premarketing approval of our Prolieve Thermodilatation system, we received a one-time licensing fee of $4 million under our agreement with Boston Scientific, the distributor of our Prolieve system. Since receipt of the PMA, in February, 2004 sales of Prolieve products generated revenues to us of $21.6 million. Until such time as we are able to complete development and testing of, and gain necessary regulatory approvals for, one or more of our other products, sales of Prolieve products will represent our only source of revenue. We presently do not have any committed sources of financing. Therefore, we are reliant on revenues from the sale of our Prolieve products and from funds generated through the sale of our securities to fund our ongoing operations.

The Prolieve system consists of a microwave generator and conductors, along with a computer and computer software programs that control the focusing and application of heat (control units), plus a specially designed, single-use catheter kit. We expect to continue to generate revenues from sales of control units and catheter kits to Boston Scientific. Under our agreement with Boston Scientific, we are entitled to receive our costs plus 50% of the “profit” for each control unit—measured as the difference between our costs and Boston Scientific’s selling price (determined in accordance with the agreement) for each control unit—and 50% of the revenue generated by Boston Scientific from the sale of catheter kits, for which Celsion bears the cost of goods sold. During the introduction of the Prolieve system, we anticipate that sales of both control units and catheter kits will increase. However, over time we expect that sales will level off.

-18-

Table of Contents

Our principal costs consist of:

Our research and development activities, pre-clinical tests and clinical trials, and the manufacturing, marketing and labeling of each of our products are subject to extensive regulation by the FDA. We may not bring to market any product in the U.S. without approval, in the form of a premarketing approval from the FDA. We received such premarketing approval for our Prolieve system on February 19, 2004. We are currently conducting basic research and development activities, pursuing prototype products through clinical testing and regulatory approval. Our ultimate objective is to commercialize those products to generate a return on investment for our stockholders through one of several means including:

During the quarter ended June 30, 2006, Celsion conducted a voluntary “Class II” recall related to its disposable catheter kit in order to correct a manufacturing issue that could cause the catheter to fail to reach operating pressure during a treatment. An investigation by the Company of the new catheter kit manufacturer revealed issues in the manufacturing process and in one of the components that resulted in the performance failure. The Company has since corrected both issues and filed a supplement with the FDA to approve the change in the manufacturing process. A Class II recall is a situation in which use of the product in question may cause temporary or medically reversible adverse health consequences or where the probability of serious adverse health consequences is remote. Shipments of disposable catheter kits began again in August 2006.

Recent Events

On September 7, 2006 Lawrence Olanoff, M.D, Ph.D., President and Chief Executive Officer, tendered his resignation effective October 6, 2006. Anthony P. Deasey, Celsion’s Executive Vice President, Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer was named Interim President and Chief Executive Officer of Celsion during the transitional period while a permanent Chief Executive Officer is recruited.

Gary W. Pace, Ph.D. and Kris Venkat, Ph.D., members of Celsion’s Board of Directors, will actively assist executive management during the transition period. Both Drs. Pace and Venkat have extensive pharmaceutical development and business expertise to contribute to this effort. As part of the goal of establishing a separate oncology drug development business, and advancing the current drug development program, William Hahne, M.D., who was Vice President Clinical and Medical Affairs, was promoted to the newly established position of Vice President of Research and Development. Anthony P. Deasey also assumed the position of President of the Prolieve Division.

As of October 16, 2006 the Company had enrolled 21 patients in its ThermoDox/RFA liver cancer Phase I study. Celsion is conducting the study in collaboration with the National Institutes of Health (“NIH”) and Queen Mary’s Hospital, Hong Kong, and is aggressively recruiting patients eligible for enrollment in the study both at the NIH and Queen Mary’s Hospital. The Company believes this study is close to determining the dose which triggers dose-limiting toxicity as defined in the protocol.

-19-

Table of Contents

Celsion has provided a research grant in the amount of $500,000 to Duke University and is providing clinical supplies of ThermoDox to support a Phase I, open label study of the safety and pharmacokinetics in Recurrent Chest Wall Breast Cancer patients. To date, Duke has enrolled and initiated treatment in six patients.

Results of Operations

Comparison of Three Months Ended September 30, 2006 and Three Months Ended September 30, 2005

Net sales for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 were $4,122,908, an increase of $917,079 or (29%), compared to $3,205,829 in the quarter ended September 30, 2005. Product sales consist of sales of our Prolieve products and are comprised of two elements – sales of control units and sales of disposable catheter kits, all to our exclusive distributor, Boston Scientific Corporation. The increase in revenues during the quarter ended September 30, 2006 compared to the quarter ended September 30, 2005, was the result of continued sales growth of the Prolieve product and was achieved despite the fact that the Company was unable to ship product during the period July 1, 2006 to August 10, 2006, as a result of a product recall. Sales in the quarter were positively affected by the impact of sales to Boston Scientific required to re-build its warehouse inventory.

The gross margin for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 was $2,219,764 or (53.9%) of sales compared to $1,019,189 or (31.8%) of sales for the quarter ended September 30, 2005. The increase in gross margin percentage is the result of a cost reduction due to transfer of the production of the disposable Prolieve catheter kit to a new supplier.

The increase of $43,707 or (2%) in research and development expense during the quarter compared to the quarter ended September 30, 2005 was due to a number of factors including:

-20-

Table of Contents

These increases were offset by:

The $39,501 or (5%) increase in general and administrative expense during the quarter ended September 30, 2006 compared to the comparable period during 2005 was due to a number of factors including:

These increases were offset by:

The increase in the gross profit generated from the sale of Prolieve products ($1,200,575), offset by an increase in operating expenses of $83,208, resulted in a decrease in the loss from operations for the three-month period ended September 30, 2006 of $1,117,367 or 54%, to $967,250 from $2,084,617 in the comparable period during the prior fiscal year.

Net interest in the quarter ended September 30, 2006 was an expense of $167,432 compared to income of $10,227 for the quarter ended September 30, 2005. This change was due to funding the business with a loan from Boston Scientific which closed on August 8, 2005.

Other income for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 was $143,534 compared to $120,525 for the quarter ended September 30, 2005, an increase of $23,009, primarily due to non-recurrence of a loss in 2005 on the investment in Celsion China Ltd.

The net loss for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 was $991,148 compared to $1,953,865 for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 a decrease of $962,717 principally due to the increase in gross margin.

-21-

Table of Contents

Comparison of Nine Months Ended September 30, 2006 and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2005

Net sales for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 were $6,775,117, a decrease of $1,197,215 or (15%), compared to $7,972,332 for the nine months ended September 30, 2005. Product sales consist of sales of our Prolieve products and are comprised of two elements – sales of control units and sales of disposable catheter kits, all to our exclusive distributor, Boston Scientific Corporation. The decrease in revenues in the period was principally due to an interruption in the supply of product caused by a product recall due to manufacturing defects occurring during a change in the manufacturing process due to the transition to a new supplier of our disposable Prolieve catheter kit.

The gross margin for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 was $2,465,598 or (36.4%) compared to $2,587,136 or (32.5%) of sales for the nine months ended September 30, 2005. Year to date gross margin as a percentage of sales is lower than the current quarter gross margin due to costs incurred in scrapping returned and recalled product.

The decrease of $90,592, or (1%) in research and development expense during the nine months ended September 30, 2006 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2005 was due primarily to a number of factors including:

-22-

Table of Contents

These decreases were offset by:

The $294,608 or (11%) increase in general and administrative expense during the nine months ended September 30, 2006 as compared to the comparable period during 2005 was attributable to a number of factors including:

These increases were offset by:

The net increase of $204,016 in operating expenditures during the nine months ended September 30, 2006 when compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2005, combined with the charges associated with the product recall, resulted in an increase in the loss from operations for the nine month period ended September 30, 2006 of $325,554 or 5%, to $7,384,145 from $7,058,591 in the comparable period during the prior fiscal year.

Net interest in the nine months ended September 30, 2006 was an expense of $296,792 compared to income of $135,466 for the nine months ended September 30, 2005. This change was due to funding the business with a loan from Boston Scientific which closed on August 8, 2005.

Other income for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 was $1,183,469 compared to $361,970 for the nine months ended September 30, 2005, an increase of $821,499 principally due to a gain of $1,011,923 on the sale of the stock of Celsion (Canada) Limited on January 16, 2006.

The net loss for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 was $6,497,468 compared to $6,561,155 for the nine months ended September 30, 2005, a decrease of $63,687 principally due to the gain on the sale of Celsion (Canada) Limited offset by the increased interest expense on the Boston Scientific loan and costs associated with the product recall.

-23-

Table of Contents

Financial Condition, Liquidity and Capital Resources

Celsion’s core business activity is the development of products to treat cancer and other diseases and to commercialize those products to generate a return on investment for its stockholders through one of several means including:

This business model will generate uneven cash flows, inasmuch as continuing development expenditures will not necessarily be matched by revenues from one of the above sources. In the event that annual development expenditures are not covered by current revenues, funding will be provided from other sources including any cash on hand, revenues provided as above, income generated from licensing agreements and debt or equity funding raised in the capital markets.

Since inception, our expenses have significantly exceeded our revenues, resulting in an accumulated deficit of $89,400,052 at September 30, 2006. We have incurred negative cash flows from operations since our inception and have funded our operations primarily through the sale of equity securities. As of September 30, 2006, we had total current assets of $16,586,579, including cash and short term investments of $10,372,878, compared with current liabilities of $3,507,832, resulting in a working capital surplus of $13,078,747. As of December 31, 2005 we had $8,313,430 in cash and short term investments and total current assets of $12,841,104 compared with current liabilities of $3,885,463, which resulted in working capital of $8,955,641 at the fiscal year end.

Net cash used in the Company’s operating activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 was $6,145,099 compared to $7,151,285 for the nine months ending September 30, 2005. This net cash requirement was funded from cash on hand at the beginning of the year, together with the second and third installments of a loan from Boston Scientific totaling $9 million. Under the loan agreement, which was effective on August 8, 2005, Boston Scientific agreed to lend the Company up to $15 million, disbursed in three installments. The first installment, in the amount of $6 million, was disbursed on August 17, 2005. The second installment of $4.5 million was disbursed on February 2, 2006 and the third installment of $4.5 million was disbursed on July 28, 2006. The loan, which has a term expiring on February 20, 2009 and bears interest at a rate of prime plus 1 percent is due on the first to occur of:

The Company has the right to prepay the loan at any time without penalty.

Boston Scientific may at any time convert in whole or in part the outstanding principal plus accrued interest into shares of the Company’s common stock at a minimum conversion price of $9.15 per share. Additionally, Boston Scientific may apply the outstanding principal plus accrued interest toward the option exercise price if Boston Scientific decides to exercise the option granted by the Company. The option granted by the Company gives Boston Scientific the right to purchase for $60 million the assets and

-24-

Table of Contents

technology relating to the manufacture, marketing, sale, distribution and/or research and development of products using thermal therapy for the treatment of BPH. There can be no assurance when, if ever, Boston Scientific will exercise its right to purchase. In the event that Boston Scientific does exercise its option, the Company will receive an immediate infusion of cash but will cease to receive revenues from the sale of Prolieve systems and related disposables.

In the nine months ended September 30, 2006 total assets and total liabilities and shareholder equity increased by $3,408,094 to $19,317,535 compared to $15,909,441 at December 31, 2005. The increase was due to a number of factors including:

The increases were offset by:

The increase in total liabilities and stockholder equity was due to a number of factors including:

These increases were offset by:

Additionally, the escrow account license fee balance was reclassified from other assets to current assets due to the expiration of the 36 month escrow period set for March, 2007. Costs of $135,973 have been disbursed from the escrow account during the quarter ended September 30, 2006.

For fiscal year 2006, we expect to expend approximately $10,000,000 to commercialize our Prolieve system and for clinical testing of liver cancer and breast cancer treatment systems, as well as for corporate

-25-

Table of Contents

overhead, all of which we expect to fund from funds on hand and revenues anticipated from the sale of our Prolieve system and related disposables. The foregoing is an estimate, based upon assumptions as to the scheduling of institutional clinical research and testing personnel, the timing of clinical trials and other factors, not all of which are fully predictable.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure about Market Risk.

Our loan from Boston Scientific Corporation bears interest at a variable rate; therefore changes in prevailing interest rates would impact the amount owed under such loans. A one percentage point fluctuation in interest rates would not have a material impact.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

We have carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures, as that term is defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Based on that evaluation, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that as of September 30, 2006, which is the end of the period covered by this report, our disclosure controls and procedures are effective.

There has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting identified in connection with the evaluation required by paragraph (d) of Rule 13a-15 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, that occurred during the quarter ended September 30, 2006 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

-26-

Table of Contents

PART II

OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

As previously disclosed in our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on May 3, 2006, and on Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on May 11, 2006, on April 27, 2006 American Medical Systems, Inc. and AMS Research Corporation (together referred to as “AMS”) filed suit in the U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota alleging infringement of two patents of AMS resulting from our manufacture, use and sale of the Prolieve Thermodilatation system. The suit is captioned American Medical Systems, Inc. and AMS Research Corporation vs. Celsion Corporation, Case no. 0:06-cv-01606-JMR-FLN. The complaint seeks injunctive relief against the alleged infringement, unspecified trebled damages, plaintiff costs, expenses and attorney fees. Celsion believes the suit is without merit and will defend its case vigorously.

On September 1, 2006 AMS amended the compliant alleging that Prolieve infringes two additional AMS patents.

On September 27, 2006, the U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota dismissed the patent infringement lawsuit filed by American Medical Systems, Inc. (AMS) against us for lack of personal jurisdiction. On September 28, 2006, AMS filed a new suit against us in the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware, where both companies are incorporated (case no. CA-06-606 (SLR)), alleging that our Prolieve Thermodilation System infringes the patents previously asserted in the Minnesota suit. The complaint seeks injunctive relief against alleged infringement, unspecified trebled damages, plaintiff costs, expenses and attorney fees.

Item 1A. Risk Factors.

In addition to the other information set forth in this report, you should carefully consider the factors discussed in Part I, “Item 1A. Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005, which could materially affect our business, financial condition or future results. The risks described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K are not the only risks facing our Company. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem to be immaterial also may materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and/or operating results.

If we fail to regain compliance with AMEX’s continued listing standards, our Common Stock may be delisted, which would be likely to have a material adverse effect on the price of our common stock.

On June 15, 2006, we received a letter from the American Stock Exchange (“AMEX”) notifying us that, based on our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2006, we are not in compliance with the continued listing standards set forth in the AMEX Company Guide in that our shareholder’s equity is less than $4,000,000 and we had losses from continuing operations and/or net losses in three of our four most recent fiscal years and that shareholders’ equity was less than $6,000,000 and losses from continuing operations and/or net losses were incurred in the last five fiscal years. At the request of AMEX, on July 13, 2006, we submitted a plan advising AMEX of actions we have taken, and will take, to bring us into compliance with the continued listing standards within a maximum of 18 months from June 14, 2006.

On August 31, 2006, we received a letter from AMEX notifying us that based upon a review of our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2006, we are not in compliance with an additional continued listing standard in that our shareholders’ equity is less than $2,000,000 and we had losses from continuing operations and/or net losses in two of our three most recent fiscal years. AMEX also notified us on August 31, 2006 that it has accepted our plan of compliance and that our plan makes a

-27-

Table of Contents

reasonable demonstration of our ability to regain compliance with the continued listing standards. In connection with the acceptance of our plan, AMEX has granted us an extension until December 14, 2007 to regain compliance with the continued listing standards. AMEX will allow us to maintain our AMEX listing through the plan period, subject to periodic review of our progress by the AMEX staff. If we are not in compliance with the continued listing standards or do not make progress consistent with our plan during the plan period, AMEX may then initiate delisting proceedings. The failure to maintain listing of our Common Stock on AMEX would be likely to have a material adverse effect on the market and the market price for our Common Stock.

Item 6. Exhibits.

-28-

Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

November 8, 2006

-29-

Table of Contents

Exhibit Index

-30-