Imunon, Inc. - Quarter Report: 2007 June (Form 10-Q)

Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2007

or

For the transition period from              to             

Commission file number 000-14242

CELSION CORPORATION

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)

(410) 290-5390

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large Accelerated filer:  ¨            Accelerated filer:  ¨             Non-accelerated filer:  x

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).  Yes  ¨    No  x

As of July 20, 2007 the Registrant had outstanding 10,831,917 shares of Common Stock, $.01 par value.

Table of Contents

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Table of Contents

PART I

FINANCIAL INFORMATION

3

Table of Contents

CELSION CORPORATION

BALANCE SHEETS

June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006

ASSETS

4

Table of Contents

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY / (DEFICIT)

See accompanying notes.

5

Table of Contents

CELSION CORPORATION

STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(Unaudited)

See accompanying notes.

6

Table of Contents

CELSION CORPORATION

STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Unaudited)

See accompanying notes

7

Table of Contents

CELSION CORPORATION

STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Unaudited)

8

Table of Contents

CELSION CORPORATION

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

For the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2007 and 2006

Note 1. Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited condensed financial statements of Celsion Corporation (which we sometimes refer to as “Celsion”, the “Company”, “we” or “us”) have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring accruals considered necessary for a fair presentation, have been included in the accompanying unaudited financial statements. Operating results for the three and six month period ended June 30, 2007 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for any other interim period(s) or for any full year. For further information, refer to the financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 27, 2007.

Note 2. Common Stock Outstanding and Per Share Information

Basic earnings per share is computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted earnings per share is computed after adjusting the denominator of the basic earnings per share computation for the effects of all dilutive potential common shares outstanding during the period. The dilutive effects of options, warrants and their equivalents are computed using the treasury stock method.

For the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2006, 19,500 and 77,181 options and warrants have been excluded, respectively, from the calculation of diluted earnings per share as their effect would be anti-dilutive. The total number of outstanding warrants and options for the periods ended June 30, 2007 and 2006 were 2,011,986 and 2,248,597, respectively.

Information relating to the calculation of earnings per share is summarized as follows:

9

Table of Contents

Note 3. New Accounting Pronouncements

In June 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Interpretation 48 “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes – An Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109” (“Interpretation 48”) which clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in accordance with FASB Statement 109, Accounting for Income Taxes. This interpretation prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken in a tax return. The interpretation also provides guidance on de-recognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting for interim periods, disclosure and transition and is effective for periods beginning after December 31, 2006. The Company has substantial net operating loss carry-forwards that are fully reserved and that are available to reduce its future taxable income. As a result, the adoption of Interpretation 48 did not have an effect on the Company’s results of operations, financial condition or liquidity.

In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued SFAS No. 157 “Fair Value Measurements”, which defines fair value, establishes a framework for consistently measuring fair value under generally accepted accounting principles, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 will be effective for the Company on January 1, 2008 and is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s financial statements.

In February 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued SFAS No. 159 “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities – including an amendment of FASB Statement No. 115”. SFAS No. 159 permits entities to choose to measure eligible items at fair value at specified election dates and report unrealized gains and losses on items for which the fair value option has been elected in earnings at each subsequent reporting date. SFAS No. 159 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007 and is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s financial statements.

Note 4. Stock Based Compensation

Employee Stock Options

The Company has long-term compensation plans that permit the granting of incentive awards in the form of stock options. Generally, the terms of these plans require that the exercise price of the options may not be less than the fair market value of Celsion’s Common Stock on the date the options are granted. Options generally vest over various time frames or upon milestone accomplishments. Some vest immediately. Others vest over a period between one and five years. The Company’s options generally expire ten years from the date of the grant.

2001 Stock Option Plan

The purpose of the 2001 Plan is to promote long-term growth and profitability of Celsion by providing key associates with incentives to improve stockholder value and to contribute to the growth and financial success of Celsion and to enable the Company to attract, retain and reward the best available persons for positions of substantial responsibility. The 2001 Plan permitted the granting of stock options (including nonqualified stock options and incentive stock options qualifying under Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code) and stock appreciation rights or any combination of the foregoing. During the year that ended December 31, 2006, 21,336 options were canceled or expired. During the six months ended June 30, 2007, 4,333 options were canceled or expired. All canceled and expired options under the 2001 Plan become available for issue under the 2004 Plan.

2004 Stock Incentive Plan

The purpose of the 2004 Plan is to promote the long-term growth and financial success of the Company and enable the Company to attract, retain and reward the best available persons for positions of substantial responsibility. The 2004 Plan permits the granting of awards in the form of incentive stock options, restricted stock, restricted stock units, stock appreciation rights, phantom stock, and performance awards, or in any combination of the foregoing. During the year that ended December 31, 2006, 63,823 options were canceled or expired. During the six months ended June 30, 2007, 714,000 options were issued, 666 options were exercised and 126,501options were canceled or expired. On June 30, 2007 options to purchase 94,680 shares were available from the 741,834 shares authorized under the 2004 Plan.

2007 Stock Incentive Plan

On June 13, 2007, the Company adopted the Celsion Corporation 2007 Stock Incentive Plan (the “2007 Plan”). The purpose of the 2007 Plan is to promote the long-term growth and profitability of the Company by providing incentives to

10

Table of Contents

improve stockholder value and enable the Company to attract, retain and reward the best available persons for positions of substantial responsibility. The 2007 Plan permits the granting of awards in the form of incentive stock options, nonqualified stock options, restricted stock, restricted stock units, stock appreciation rights, phantom stock, and performance awards, or in any combination of the foregoing. During the six months ended June 30, 2007, no options were issued, canceled or expired under the plan. On June 30, 2007, options to purchase 1,000,000 shares were authorized and available under the 2007 Plan. All canceled and expired options under the 2001 Plan and the 2004 Plan become available for issue under the 2007 Plan.

Options Issued to Consultants for Services

The Company enters into agreements with consultants in which the consultants receive stock options in exchange for services. Generally, the terms of these plans require that the exercise price of the options may not be less than the fair market value of Celsion’s Common Stock on the date the options are granted. Options generally vest over various time frames or upon milestone accomplishments. Some vest immediately. Others vest over a period between one and five years. The Company’s options generally expire ten years from the date of the grant There were no options granted to non-employees for the six months ended June 30, 2007.

A summary of the Company’s Common Stock option and warrant activity and related information is as follows:

11

Table of Contents

The following is additional information with respect to options outstanding at June 30, 2007

For all of the Company’s stock-based compensation plans, the fair value of each grant was estimated at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. Black-Scholes utilizes assumptions related to volatility, the risk-free interest rate, the dividend yield and employee exercise behavior. Expected volatilities utilized in the model are based on historical volatility of the Company’s stock price. The risk free interest rate is derived from values assigned to U.S. Treasury strips as published in the Wall Street Journal in effect at the time of grant. The model incorporates exercise, pre-vesting and post-vesting forfeiture assumptions based on analysis of historical data. The expected life of the fiscal 2007 grants was generated using the simplified method as allowed under Securities and Exchange Commission Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 107.

Stock based compensation expense totaled $225,179 and $368,727 during the three and six months ended June 30, 2007 and $200,852 and $557,283 during the three and six months ended June 30, 2006. Stock based compensation is recognized ratably over the requisite service period for all awards. Unrecognized stock based compensation expense related to stock options totaled $1,574,554 at June 30, 2007 while the unrecognized stock based compensation expense related to non-vested restricted stock awards was $119,602 at June 30, 2007.

Note 5. Note Receivable

On January 16, 2006, Celsion contributed to its wholly-owned subsidiary, Celsion (Canada) Limited (“Canada”), all of the Company’s assets relating to its Adaptive Phased Array (“APA”) technology for the treatment of breast cancer. Also on that date, the Company entered into a Stock Purchase Agreement with the Company’s founder and former officer and director, Dr. Augustine Y. Cheung, whereby the Company sold to Dr. Cheung all of the issued and outstanding shares of capital stock of Canada. The Company also agreed to provide certain services to Canada pursuant to a Transition Services Agreement between the Company and Canada.

Under the Stock Purchase Agreement, all of the capital stock of Canada was transferred to Dr. Cheung in exchange for a promissory note made by Dr. Cheung in favor of the Company in the principal amount of $1,500,000 to be paid over a period of up to 78 months and secured by a pledge of 100,536 shares of Celsion common stock owned by Dr. Cheung and his wife and the commitment of Canada to pay a 5 % royalty on the net sales of certain products sold by and patent royalties received by Canada and its successors and assigns, of up to $18,500,000.

The terms of the note receivable only specify an interest charge in the event that scheduled payments are in arrears. The $1,500,000 note was therefore discounted at the prime rate in effect January 16, 2006 (7.25%) plus 1.0%, or 8.25%, and the balance, net of discount, of $1,146,428 was recorded in the financial statements above. Interest income of $40,054 and $38,907 was recorded in the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively.

Note 6. Advances under Celsion (Canada) Limited Transition Services Agreement

In conjunction with the sale of Canada, a Transition Services Agreement was entered into whereby (i) Celsion sublet space in the Company’s offices for use by Canada to carry on its business, for a period of up to six (6) months from the date of the agreement; (ii) Celsion provided administrative support services as needed in the operation of Canada’s business for the period of the sublease and (iii) advanced funds to pay salary and health and dental insurance of each of certain employees of Canada and the expenses reasonably incurred in connection with the operation of Canada’s business up to $100,000 for the shorter of the period ending June 30, 2006 or the date of closing by Canada of a transaction involving the merger of Canada into a newly created Canadian Capital Pool Company and a simultaneous funding through a private placement of shares under terms approved by the Toronto Stock Exchange (the “Canada Transaction”). Within ten days after the closing of the Canada Transaction, Canada will pay the Company all amounts due under the Transition Services Agreement.

12

Table of Contents

The Transition Services Agreement was amended on March 28, 2006 to advance Canada an additional $200,000 to fund reasonable operating expenses. This additional advance is repayable under the same terms as the Transition Services Agreement. However, in the event of default, Dr. Cheung will forgo payments due under a consulting agreement between Celsion and Dr. Cheung dated January 16, 2006. The cumulative balance advanced under the Transition Services Agreement, as amended, at June 30, 2007 was $615,457.

The Canada Transaction did not close by December 31, 2006. Based on discussions with Canada management, Celsion management established that diligent efforts were being made by Canada management to close the Canada Transaction on a timely basis and agreed to extend the due date for repayment of the loan to the earlier of the closing of the Canada Transaction or June 30, 2007. Canada has not closed the transaction nor has it paid the amounts due. Accordingly, the Company has placed an allowance of $415,457 against the amounts due. The remaining balance of $200,000 is secured by amounts due under a consulting agreement between Dr. Cheung and the Company. The remaining payments due under the contract ($200,000) were suspended effective July 17, 2006 until all amounts due under the Transition Services Agreement have been paid by Canada. In the event that Canada defaults, the $200,000 remaining to be paid to Dr. Cheung will forfeited.

Note 7. Investment in Celsion China, Ltd.

On December 15, 2003, the Company announced the formation of a joint venture with Asia Pacific Life Science Group, Ltd., a group of Hong Kong-based investors, to develop our technologies and distribute our products in Greater China. Celsion acquired 45.65% of the equity of Celsion China, Ltd. for $200,000 on February 5, 2004.

On January 12, 2006, Celsion acquired a further 25.65% of the equity of Celsion China, Ltd. from Asia Pacific Life Science Group, Ltd for $25,000 increasing Celsion’s total equity position to 71.3%.

An additional cash advance in the amount of $84,123 in the form of a loan was made to Celsion China, Ltd. on January 27, 2006.

Celsion terminated its interest in Celsion China, Ltd. on May 9, 2006. The loan write-off, other receivable write-off and final dissolution expenses related to Celsion China, Ltd. were recorded as a loss on investment in Celsion China, Ltd. of $207,687.

Note 8. Licensing Agreement

Celsion entered into a Distribution Agreement with Boston Scientific Corporation (“Boston Scientific” or “BSC”) on January 20, 2003 pursuant to which the Company granted Boston Scientific exclusive rights to market and distribute the Prolieve system and its component parts for the treatment of BPH in all territories other than China, Taiwan, Hong Kong, Macao, Mexico and Central and South America. The agreement was terminated upon the sale of the Prolieve assets to Boston Scientific on June 21, 2007 (as more fully described in Note 11). The Distribution Agreement had a seven-year term commencing on February 21, 2004. The parties previously shared gross sales (less costs and expenses) attributable to the product.

Celsion received a $4,000,000 licensing fee under the Distribution Agreement $2,000,000 of which was placed in an interest bearing escrow account for a period of 36 months ending February 21, 2007 for payment of any legal expenses, settlements, license fees, royalties, damages or judgments incurred by Celsion or Boston Scientific in connection with any patent litigation related to alleged infringement of third party patents. Interest on the funds was retained in the escrow account and accrued to the benefit of Celsion. The balance remaining in the escrow was released to Celsion on February 20, 2007 and applied to settlement of a patent infringement lawsuit with American Medical Systems, Inc. and AMS Research Corporation (together referred to as “AMS”).

The Company recognized the licensing fee at a rate of $47,619 per month over the seven-year term of the Distribution Agreement which began February 21, 2004. Upon the sale of the Prolieve assets on June 21, 2007, the remaining balance of the fee was recorded as income and included in the gain on the sale of the Prolieve assets during the quarter ended June 30, 2007.

13

Table of Contents

Note 9. Inventory

Inventory was comprised of Prolieve Thermodilatation^® system control units, parts inventory and associated disposable treatment kits. All inventory was transferred to Boston Scientific upon the sale of the Prolieve assets on June 21, 2007. Inventory was stated at the lower of cost or market. Inventory on hand at June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006 was as follows:

Note 10. Loan Payable

On August 8, 2005, Celsion and Boston Scientific entered into the First Amendment to the Transaction Agreement (the “First Amendment”) pursuant to which BSC agreed to lend the Company up to $15,000,000 (the “Loan”) to be evidenced by one or more convertible secured promissory notes. The first installment of $6,000,000 was disbursed on August 17, 2005. The second and third installments, each of $4,500,000, were disbursed on February 2, 2006, and July 28, 2006 respectively.

Interest was due on the first to occur of (i) February 20, 2009, (ii) upon repayment of the principal amount in full, (iii) upon BSC’s exercise of its option to purchase certain assets and technology or (iv) on conversion of the principal amount plus accrued interest, if any, to shares of the Company’s common stock. The Company had the right to prepay the loan at any time without penalty.

The principal balance of the Loan, together with accrued interest, was repaid upon the closing of the sale of the Prolieve assets to BSC on June 21, 2007.

Note 11. Discontinued Operations

On April 17, 2007, the Company and Boston Scientific entered into an asset purchase agreement to reflect the exercise by Boston Scientific of its option to purchase all of the Prolieve assets of the Company (the “Asset Purchase Agreement”). The Board of Directors of the Company approved the Asset Purchase Agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby, and the Company’s stockholders ratified the sale at the annual meeting on June 13, 2007. Pursuant to the Asset Purchase Agreement, Boston Scientific has purchased the Prolieve assets for an aggregate purchase price of $60 million, subject to reduction in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Asset Purchase Agreement. The transaction was closed on June 21, 2007, and the Company recorded a gain on the sale in the amount of $48 million.

As previously disclosed, the Company and Boston Scientific entered into a Transaction Agreement effective January 20, 2003 (the “Transaction Agreement”) pursuant to which Boston Scientific would make equity investments in the Company through the purchase of Company common stock upon attainment of specified milestones by the Company. As of June 30, 2007, Boston Scientific owned 7.88% of the Company’s common stock.

As part of the consideration in the Transaction Agreement, the Company granted Boston Scientific an exclusive option to purchase the Prolieve assets for a price equal to the greater of $60 million or a multiple of sales, exercisable for a period of five years and expiring in February 2009. As previously disclosed, on August 8, 2005, the Company and Boston Scientific entered into the First Amendment pursuant to which Boston Scientific agreed to lend the Company up to $15 million to be evidenced by one or more convertible secured promissory notes (the “Notes”). The first installment of $6 million was disbursed on August 17, 2005, the second and third installments, each of $4.5 million, were disbursed on February 2, 2006, and July 28, 2006 respectively. The First Amendment also fixed the purchase option price at $60 million (eliminating the multiple).

The Asset Purchase Agreement reflects the agreement by the the Company and Boston Scientific to further modify the terms of the purchase option granted to Boston Scientific on January 20, 2003 and amended on August 8, 2005. The

14

Table of Contents

revised terms provide for the aggregate purchase price of $60 million to be paid in three installments consisting of $30 million at closing on June 20, 2007 and $15 million on each of the first and second anniversaries of the closing. The revised terms also provided that the $30 million first installment was reduced at closing by approximately $17 million, representing the principal and accrued interest due on the Notes. In addition to the other indemnification provisions, such as indemnification for breaches of representations, warranties and covenants contained in the Asset Purchase Agreement, the Company will indemnify Boston Scientific for a period of two years from the closing, in an amount up to $15 million of incurred costs, in the event of unforeseen intellectual property claims related to the Prolieve assets.

The foregoing description of the Asset Purchase Agreement does not purport to be complete and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the complete terms of the Asset Purchase Agreement and Second Amendment to Transaction Agreement, by and between the Company and Boston Scientific, dated April 17, 2007, copies of which were included as Exhibits 10.1 and 10.2, respectively, to the Company’s Form 8-K which was filed on April 18, 2007 and are incorporated herein by reference.

Note 12. Contingencies

Legal Settlement

On April 27, 2006, American Medical Systems, Inc. and AMS Research Corporation (together referred to as “AMS”) filed suit in the U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota alleging infringement of two patents of AMS resulting from our manufacture, use and sale of the Prolieve Thermodilatation system. The complaint sought injunctive relief against the alleged infringement, unspecified trebled damages, plaintiff costs, expenses and attorney fees. On September 1, 2006, AMS amended the complaint alleging that Prolieve infringed upon two additional AMS patents.

On February 7, 2007, Celsion entered into an agreement with AMS that settled the patent dispute. Under the settlement terms, Celsion paid a licensing fee and a royalty based on sales of its Prolieve product to acquire a product license to AMS’ patents for the use of microwave energy to treat BPH and prostatitis. The agreement ended litigation between the two parties. The agreement was reached with the concurrence of BSC in accordance with the Transaction Agreement between BSC and Celsion dated January 21, 2003 which granted BSC an option to purchase the Prolieve assets and which required that Celsion obtain BSC’s approval prior to entering into agreements related to the Prolieve business.

Purchase Commitment

Sanmina-SCI (“Sanmina”) and Celsion entered into a Medical Product Manufacturing Services Agreement on April 2, 2003 for the production of the Company’s Prolieve Thermodilatation control units. This agreement was assigned to Boston Scientific upon the closing of the sale of the Prolieve assets on June 21, 2007. It was stipulated in the agreement that Celsion may from time to time require Sanmina to acquire component inventories in excess of the then current demand. Any such inventory of components purchased and held by Sanmina would be designated as “excess” inventory, and Celsion would be responsible to reimburse Sanmina for the delivered cost of those components. Beginning October 1, 2005, Celsion was paying a 1.5% monthly inventory carrying charge in lieu of payment in full.

Forward-Looking Statements

Statements and terms such as “expect”, “anticipate”, “estimate”, “plan”, “believe” and words of similar import regarding the Company’s expectations as to the development and effectiveness of its technologies, the potential demand for our products, and other aspects of our present and future business operations, constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Although we believe that our expectations are based on reasonable assumptions within the bounds of our knowledge of our industry, business and operations, we cannot guarantee that actual results will not differ materially from our expectations. In evaluating such forward-looking statements, readers should specifically consider the various factors contained in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 including, without limitation, unforeseen changes in the course of research and development activities and in clinical trials; possible changes in cost and timing of development and testing, capital structure, and other financial items; changes in approaches to medical treatment; introduction of new products by others; possible acquisitions of other technologies, assets or businesses; and possible actions by customers,

15

Table of Contents

suppliers, competitors and regulatory authorities. These and other risks and uncertainties could cause actual results to differ materially from those indicated by such forward-looking statements, including those set forth in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Risk Factors” contained in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006.

The discussion of risks and uncertainties set forth in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and in our most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K as well as in other filings with the SEC, is not necessarily a complete or exhaustive list of all risks facing the Company at any particular point in time. We operate in a highly competitive, highly regulated and rapidly changing environment and our business is in a state of evolution. Therefore, it is likely that new risks will emerge, and that the nature and elements of existing risks will change, over time. It is not possible for management to predict all such risk factors or changes therein, or to assess either the impact of all such risk factors on our business or the extent to which any individual risk factor, combination of factors, or new or altered factors, may cause results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statement. We disclaim any obligation to revise or update any forward-looking statement that may be made from time to time by us or on our behalf.

Overview

Celsion is a biotechnology company dedicated to furthering the development and commercialization of oncology drugs including tumor-targeting treatments using focused heat energy in combination with heat activated drug delivery. We are currently engaged in the development of treatment systems using a combination of heat and drugs developed on our proprietary heat activated liposomal technology platform. Our first drug, ThermoDox^®, an encapsulation of doxorubicin, a common oncology drug, in our heat activated liposome, is in clinical studies for the treatment of liver cancer and breast cancer. In 1989, we obtained premarketing approval (“PMA”) from the FDA to use our microwave-based Microfocus 1000 heat therapy system on surface and subsurface tumors in conjunction with radiation therapy. We marketed this system until 1995. From 1995 until early in 2004, we engaged in research and development of new treatment systems. On January 16, 2006, we transferred all of our rights to the Microfocus 1000, together will all associated technology, to Celsion Canada LLC and on the same day sold all the stock of Celsion Canada to our founder and former officer and director, Dr. Augustine Cheung. On February 19, 2004, we obtained a PMA for the Prolieve Thermodilatation System for the treatment of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH). From 2004 through 2007, Prolieve was marketed and sold through our commercial distributor, Boston Scientific. On June 21, 2007, we sold all of our Prolieve assets to Boston Scientific Corporation.

Development pipeline

Our pipeline presently consists of the following product, in the indicated stage of development:

While the Company is currently funded from the available cash resources, we anticipate that in the longer term revenues will be generated from licensing fees paid for our technologies by pharmaceutical manufacturers and royalties generated from eventual product sales to major institutional health care providers. In the event that such licensing fees are not forthcoming funding will be generated from sale of our equity securities.

16

Table of Contents

From 1995 to 2004, we generated only minimal revenues and have funded our operations primarily through private placements of our equity securities. During 2004, following FDA premarketing approval of the Prolieve Thermodilatation system, we received a one-time licensing fee of $4 million under our agreement with Boston Scientific, the former distributor of our Prolieve system. Since receipt of the PMA, sales of Prolieve products have generated revenues of approximately $29 million. The sale of the Prolieve assets to BSC, along with raising additional equity, is anticipated to generate sufficient funding until such time as we are able to complete development and testing of, and gain necessary regulatory approvals for, one or more of our products.

Our principal costs consist of:

Our research and development activities, pre-clinical tests and clinical trials, and the manufacturing, marketing and labeling of each of our products, are subject to extensive regulation by the FDA. We may not bring to market any product in the U.S. without approval, in the form of a premarketing approval from the FDA. We are currently conducting basic research and development activities, pursuing prototype products through clinical testing and regulatory approval. Our ultimate objective is to commercialize those products to generate a return on investment for our stockholders through one of several means including: (a) selling products directly to end users; (b) selling products through a distributor; or (c) licensing the technology to third parties and generating income through royalties and milestone payments.

Recent Events

On February 7, 2007, Celsion entered into an agreement with AMS that settled the patent dispute. Under the settlement terms, Celsion paid a licensing fee and will pay a royalty based on sales of its Prolieve product to acquire a product license to AMS’ patents for the use of microwave energy to treat BPH and prostatitis. The agreement ended litigation between the two parties The agreement was reached with the concurrence of BSC in accordance with the Transaction Agreement between BSC and Celsion dated January 21, 2003 which granted BSC an option to purchase the Prolieve assets and which required that Celsion obtain BSC’s approval prior to entering into agreements related to the Prolieve business.

In February 2007, the Company initiated a confirmatory Phase I dose escalation study of our RFA and our single vial formulation of ThermoDox treatment regimen. The study is currently being performed at the Cleveland Clinic Foundation and at North Shore Long Island Jewish Health System. The first patient in this study was treated during February 2007. This study is not expected to impact the timing of the Phase III liver study.

On March 12, 2007, the Board of Directors of Celsion appointed Dr. Augustine Chow as a member of the Board of Directors of the Company. Dr. Chow was appointed a class one director, and the Board of Directors resolved to expand the Board of Directors from six to seven members.

On June 21, 2007, the Company closed the previously announced sale of its Prolieve assets to Boston Scientific, The sale was previously disclosed on a Form 8-K filed by the Company on April 18, 2007.

The Prolieve Assets were sold to Boston Scientific for an aggregate purchase price of $60 million payable in three installments consisting of $30 million at closing and $15 million on each of the first and second anniversaries of the closing. In addition to the other indemnification provisions, such as indemnification for breaches of representations, warranties and covenants contained in the Asset Purchase Agreement, the Company agreed to indemnify Boston Scientific for a period of two years from the closing, in an amount up to $15 million of incurred costs, in the event of unforeseen intellectual property claims related to the Prolieve Assets. The $30 million payable at closing was reduced by approximately $17 million, representing the principal and accrued interest due on promissory notes previously issued by the Company to Boston Scientific, and certain royalty payments to AMS under the Settlement and License Agreement dated as of February 7, 2007.

The foregoing description of the Asset Purchase Agreement does not purport to be complete and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the complete terms of the Asset Purchase Agreement, a copy of which is attached to the Form 8-K filed by the Company on April 18, 2007 and is incorporated herein by reference.

17

Table of Contents

On June 13, 2007 Dr. Lawrence Olanoff resigned his membership of the Board of Directors due to time constraints imposed by his position as President and Chief Operating Officer of Forest Laboratories Inc. (NYSE: FRX).

Results of Operations

Comparison of Three Months Ended June 30, 2007 and 2006.

The increase of $941,887, or 67%, in research and development expense during the second quarter of 2007 in comparison to the second quarter of 2006 was due to:

The $553,608, or 50%, increase in general and administrative expense during the quarter ended June 30, 2007 as compared to the comparable period during 2006 was attributable to:

18

Table of Contents

Net interest expense for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 was $196,909 compared to $83,904 for the quarter ended June 30, 2006. This change was due to higher interest rates and higher loan balances due under the loan from Boston Scientific.

Other expense for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 was $415,457 compared to $329,143 for the quarter ended June 30, 2006. The entire amount for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 represented an allowance for bad debts while the amounts in the prior year represented losses incurred by Celsion China and adjustments related to the Celsion Canada transaction.

The discontinued operations reflect the income and expense of Prolieve division. These assets were sold to Boston Scientific on June 21, 2007 for $60 million. A gain of $48 million was recorded on the sale. See note 11 to the financial statements for further detail.

Comparison of Discontinued Operations for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 and 2006.

Net sales for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 were $2,893,330, an increase of $2,587,540 or 846%, compared to $305,790 for the quarter ended June 30, 2006. Product sales consisted of sales of our Prolieve products and were comprised of two elements – sales of control units and sales of disposable catheter kits, all to our exclusive distributor, Boston Scientific. The increase in revenues during the quarter ended June 30, 2007 compared to the quarter ended June 30, 2006 reflects the fact that sales were suspended in the second quarter of 2006 due to a voluntary recall of the Prolieve products.

The gross margin for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 was $1,410,964, or 48.8% of sales compared to loss of $346,083 for the quarter ended June 30, 2006. The increase in gross margin percentage was the result of the voluntary recall of the Prolieve products in the second quarter of 2006 which temporarily suspended sales.

The decrease of $135,185, or 23%, in research and development expense during the second quarter of 2007 in comparison to the quarter ended June 30, 2006 was due to:

19

Table of Contents

The increase in net income of $49,632,153 for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 compared to the quarter ended June 30, 2006 was the result of the items above together with the gain on the sale of the Prolieve assets of $48,029,793. The net income for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 also included a provision for income taxes of $274,000 which represents the estimated net tax liability (alternative minimum tax) due to the sale of the Prolieve assets.

Comparison of Six Months Ended June 30, 2007 and 2006.

The increase of $1,035,525, or 34%, in research and development expense during the six months ended June 30, 2007 comparison to the six months ended June 30, 2006 was due to:

The $703,872, or 31%, increase in general and administrative expense during the six months ended June 30, 2007 as compared to the comparable period during 2006 was attributable to:

20

Table of Contents

Net interest expense in the six months ended June 30, 2007 was $364,393 compared to $129,359 for the six months ended June 30, 2006. This change was due to higher interest rates and higher loan balances due under the loan from Boston Scientific.

Other expense for the six months ended June 30, 2007 was $415,457 compared to other income of $753,018 for the six months ended June 30, 2006. The entire amount for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 represented an allowance against amounts due from Celsion Canada under the Transition Services Agreement while the income in the first six months of 2006 principally represented a gain on the sale of Celsion Canada of $1,011,923 which was offset by a loss on Celsion China of $250,843.

The discontinued operations reflect the income and expense of Prolieve division. These assets were sold to Boston Scientific on June 21, 2007 for $60 million. A gain of $48 million was recorded on the sale. See note 11 to the financial statements for further detail.

Comparison of Discontinued Operations for the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006.