InCapta, Inc. - Quarter Report: 2017 June (Form 10-Q)

U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

☒   QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 2017

OR

☐   TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM ______________ TO ______________

COMMISSION FILE NUMBER: 000-29113

INCAPTA INC.

(Exact Name of Company as Specified in its Charter)

(619) 798-9284

(Company’s Telephone Number)

(Former Name, Former Address, and Former Fiscal Year, if Changed Since Last Report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Company was required to file such reports), and (2) been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days: Yes ☒   No ☐.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate website, if any, every interactive data file required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ☒  No ☐.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and emerging growth company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act:

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial reporting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act: Yes ☐  No ☒.

As of August 21, 2017, the Company had 695,361,644 shares of common stock issued and outstanding.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.

INCAPTA, INC.

(formerly known as TBC Global News Network, Inc.)

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

INCAPTA, INC.

(formerly known as TBC Global News Network, Inc.)

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(unaudited)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

INCAPTA, INC.

(formerly known as TBC Global News Network, Inc.)

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT)

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2016 AND 2015

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

INCAPTA, INC.

(formerly known as TBC Global News Network, Inc.)

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(unaudited)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

INCAPTA, INC.

(formerly known as TBC Global News Network, Inc.)

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2017 AND 2016

(Unaudited)

NOTE 1 – NATURE OF BUSINESS

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial statements of InCapta, Inc. a Nevada corporation (“Company”), have been prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). The information furnished herein reflects all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals and adjustments) that are, in the opinion of management, necessary to fairly present the operating results for the respective periods. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally present in annual consolidated financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“US GAAP”) were omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations. These consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and footnotes included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC. The results for the six months ended June 30, 2017, are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the year ending December 31, 2017.

The Company has redirected its efforts toward the cloud television market and has launched two cloud television networks, World Drone Recreation Aviators (wdra.tv and wdra.club) and Leading Edge Radio Network (leadingedgeradio.tv). Each network develops its own channel(s) content and works with the Company to ensure that their viewers receive it. The Company continues development of its online movie channel which will feature video on demand and a 24 hour a day streaming internet TV station providing limited free content and a subscriber based business model along with potential revenue generating video on demand programming. The online news and video news bureau in association with Leading Edge Radio Network is advancing on schedule and completion is expected by year-end. Leading Edge Radio TV continues developing a venue for new and experienced radio and TV broadcasters to host their own programs via Internet TV and radio through Mancuso Martin Productions. Leading Edge Radio Network and Mancuso Martin Productions continue strategic partnership opportunities involving radio, Internet TV and movies with the Company. The Company has also entered into discussions with Mancuso Martin Productions for screenplay properties through its production division that include seven screenplays featuring suspense thrillers, horror, comedy, romance and sports themed movies. The Company has entered into preliminary discussions for the creation of a professional line of golf balls and golf equipment in order to facilitate long term objectives of the design of a professional line of golf balls, gloves, golf shoes and apparel which will be sold direct to consumer through a proprietary marketing program, eliminating the need for brick and mortar retailing and keeping the Company overhead low.

All common stock share numbers reflect a 3,000 to 1 reverse split of the common stock effective on April 27, 2015, and a 19,000 to 1 reverse split of the common stock effective on August 8, 2016.

On September 3, 2015, the Company completed an acquisition agreement (“Acquisition Agreement”) under which the Company acquired all of the equity interests of Stimulating Software, LLC, a Florida limited liability company, the acquisition of all the common stock of Inner Four, Inc., a Florida corporation, and all of the common and preferred stock of Play Celebrity Games, Inc., a Delaware corporation.

Effective on October 21, 2015, the Company filed a Certificate of Amendment with the Nevada Secretary of State to change its name from “TBC Global News Network, Inc.” to “InCapta, Inc.”

NOTE 2 – SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

The summary of significant accounting policies of the Company is presented to assist in understanding the Company’s financial statements. The financial statements and notes are representations of the Company’s management, which is responsible for their integrity and objectivity. These accounting policies conform to generally accepted accounting principles and have been consistently applied in the preparation of the financial statements.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Because of the use of estimates inherent in the financial reporting process, actual results could differ significantly from those estimates.

Revenue Recognition

The Company recognizes revenue using four sources: Media consulting, to online television clients, monthly fees for online cloud television networks, website store revenue sharing and revenue sharing of membership fees with clients. The Company’s revenue recognition policies comply with Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) ASC 605, Revenue Recognition. Revenue is recognized when the following four criteria are met: (i) persuasive evidence that arrangement exists, (ii) services has occurred, (iii) the price is fixed and determinable and (iv) collectability is reasonably assured.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

The Company maintains cash balances in non-interest-bearing accounts that currently do not exceed federally insured limits. For the purpose of the statements of cash flows, all highly liquid investments with an original maturity of year or less are considered to be cash equivalents. As of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, there were no cash equivalents except cash of $3,216 and $1,497, respectively.

Prepaid Expenses

Prepaid expenses consist of payment for consulting fees in advance.

Stock Subscription Receivable

During the year ended December 31, 2016, the holder of 6,500,000 stock options exercised those options and the Company recorded a receivable in the amount of $975,000. The remaining balance of $848,760 is recorded as a stock subscription receivable and is presented in the accompanying financial statements as a contra-equity account. During the six months ended June 30, 2017, the Company determined that the remaining balance of $848,670 was not collectible and wrote off the entire balance to additional paid in capital as this is deemed to be a capital transaction.

Income Taxes

The Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 740, “Income Taxes.” ASC Topic 740 requires a company to use the asset and liability method of accounting for income taxes, whereby deferred tax assets are recognized for deductible temporary differences, and deferred tax liabilities are recognized for taxable temporary differences. Temporary differences are the differences between the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and their tax bases. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance when, in the opinion of management, it is more likely than not that some portion, or all of, the deferred tax assets will not be realized. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are adjusted for the effects of changes in tax laws and rates on the date of enactment.

Under ASC Topic 740, a tax position is recognized as a benefit only if it is “more likely than not” that the tax position would be sustained in a tax examination, with a tax examination being presumed to occur. The amount recognized is the largest amount of tax benefit that is greater than 50% likely of being realized on examination. For tax positions not meeting the “more likely than not” test, no tax benefit is recorded. The adoption had no effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

In accordance with ASC Topic 360, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets,” long-lived assets such as property and equipment and intangible assets subject to amortization, are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset group may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets groups to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset group to estimated undiscounted future cash flows expected to be generated by the asset group. If the carrying amount of an asset group exceeds its estimated future cash flows, an impairment charge is recognized by the amount by which the carrying amount of an asset group exceeds fair value of the asset group. No impairment charge was taken during the six months ended June 30, 2017 or 2016.

Net Loss Per Share

Basic net loss per share is computed by dividing net loss by the weighted-average number of outstanding shares of common stock during the period. Diluted net loss per share is computed by dividing the weighted-average number of outstanding shares of common stock, including any potential common shares outstanding during the period, when the potential shares are dilutive. Potential common shares consist primarily of incremental shares issuable upon the assumed exercise of stock options and warrants to purchase common stock using the treasury stock method. The calculation of diluted net loss per share gives effect to common stock equivalents; however, potential common shares are excluded if their effect is anti-dilutive. During the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, there were $397,087 and $183,088, respectively, of convertible debentures that were convertible into 675,753,523 and 50,660 shares of common shares that excluded since to their effect is anti-dilutive as a result of the net losses incurred during the periods.

Stock-Based Compensation

The Company records stock-based compensation in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718, “Compensation – Stock Compensation.” FASB ASC Topic 718 requires companies to measure compensation cost for stock-based employee compensation at fair value at the grant date and recognize the expense over the employee’s requisite service period. The Company recognizes in the statement of operations the grant-date fair value of stock options and other equity-based compensation issued to employees and non-employees. Common stock granted to employees and consultants is valued based on the market value of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant.

Derivative Financial Instruments

The Company evaluates all of its agreements to determine if such instruments have derivatives or contain features that qualify as embedded derivatives. For derivative financial instruments that are accounted for as liabilities, the derivative instrument is initially recorded at its fair value and is then re-valued at each reporting date, with changes in the fair value reported in the consolidated statements of operations. For stock-based derivative financial instruments, the Company uses a weighted average Black-Scholes-Merton option-pricing model to value the derivative instruments at inception and on subsequent valuation dates. The classification of derivative instruments, including whether such instruments should be recorded as liabilities or as equity, is evaluated at the end of each reporting period. Derivative instrument liabilities are classified in the balance sheet as current or non-current based on whether or not net-cash settlement of the derivative instrument could be required within 12 months of the balance sheet date. As of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the Company’s only derivative financial instrument were embedded conversion feature associated with convertible debentures due to certain provisions that allow for a change in the conversion price and a warrant that to contains certain provisions that allow for a change in the exercise price if securities are issued at a price per share below the exercise price.

Fair Value Measurements.

ASC Topic 820, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosure,” defines fair value as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. ASC Topic 820 also establishes a fair value hierarchy that distinguishes between (1) market participant assumptions developed based on market data obtained from independent sources (observable inputs) and (2) an entity’s own assumptions about market participant assumptions developed based on the best information available in the circumstances (unobservable inputs). The fair value hierarchy consists of three broad levels, which gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3). The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are described below:

Fair value estimates discussed herein are based upon certain market assumptions and pertinent information available to management as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016.

The Company uses Level 2 inputs for its valuation methodology for its derivative liability as its fair value was determined by using the Black-Scholes-Merton pricing model based on various assumptions. The Company’s derivative liability is adjusted to reflect fair value at each period end, with any increase or decrease in the fair value being recorded in results of operations as adjustments to fair value of derivatives.

At June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the Company identified the following liability that is required to be presented on the balance sheet at fair value:

Recent Pronouncements.

In January 2017, the FASB issued an Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2017-01, “Business Combinations (Topic 805) Clarifying the Definition of a Business.” The amendments in this update clarify the definition of a business with the objective of adding guidance to assist entities with evaluating whether transactions should be accounted for as acquisitions or disposals of assets or businesses. The definition of a business affects many areas of accounting including acquisitions, disposals, goodwill, and consolidation. The guidance is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017 and should be applied prospectively on or after the effective date. The Company is in the process of evaluating the impact of this accounting standard update.

In November 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-18, “Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Restricted Cash”, which requires restricted cash to be presented with cash and cash equivalents on the statement of cash flows and disclosure of how the statement of cash flows reconciles to the balance sheet if restricted cash is shown separately from cash and cash equivalents on the balance sheet. ASU No. 2016-18 is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, with early adoption permitted. The Company is in the process of evaluating the impact of this accounting standard update on its financial statements.

In October 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-16, “Income Taxes (Topic 740): Intra-Entity Transfer of Assets Other than Inventory,” which requires the recognition of the income tax consequences of an intra-entity transfer of an asset, other than inventory, when the transfer occurs. ASU No. 2016-16 is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018, with early adoption permitted. The Company is in the process of evaluating the impact of this accounting standard update on its financial statements.

In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-15, “Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230), Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments.” ASU No. 2016-15 provides guidance for targeted changes with respect to how cash receipts and cash payments are classified in the statements of cash flows, with the objective of reducing diversity in practice. ASU No. 2016-15 is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, with early adoption permitted. The Company is in the process of evaluating the impact of this accounting standard update on its statements of cash flows.

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-09, “Stock Compensation (Topic 718), Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting.” ASU No. 2016-09, which amends several aspects of accounting for employee share-based payment transactions including the accounting for income taxes, forfeitures, and statutory tax withholding requirements, and classification in the statement of cash flows. ASU No. 2016-09 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016 and interim periods within annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016, with early adoption permitted. The adoption of this ASU did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, “Leases (Topic 842).” ASU No. 2016-02 requires lessees to recognize lease assets and lease liabilities on the balance sheet and requires expanded disclosures about leasing arrangements. ASU 2016-02 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018 and interim periods in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, with early adoption permitted. The Company is in the process of evaluating the impact of this accounting standard update on its financial statements.

In August 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-15, “Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern,” which provides guidance on determining when and how to disclose going-concern uncertainties in the financial statements.  ASU No. 2014-15 requires management to perform interim and annual assessments of an entity's ability to continue as a going concern within one year of the date the financial statements are issued.  An entity must provide certain disclosures if conditions or events raise substantial doubt about the entity's ability to continue as a going concern.  ASU No. 2014-15 is effective for annual periods ending after December 15, 2016, and interim periods thereafter.  Early adoption is permitted.  The adoption of this ASU did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements.

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers.”  ASU No. 2014-09 is a comprehensive revenue recognition standard that will supersede nearly all existing revenue recognition guidance under current U.S. GAAP and replace it with a principle-based approach for determining revenue recognition.  ASU No. 2014-09 will require that companies recognize revenue based on the value of transferred goods or services as they occur in the contract.  This ASU also will require additional disclosure about the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from customer contracts, including significant judgments and changes in judgments and assets recognized from costs incurred to obtain or fulfill a contract.  ASU No. 2014-09 is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017.   Early adoption is permitted only in annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods therein.  Entities will be able to transition to the standard either retrospectively or as a cumulative-effect adjustment as of the date of adoption.  The Company is in the process of evaluating the impact of ASU No. 2014-09 on the Company's financial statements and disclosures.

NOTE 3 – CONVERTIBLE NOTES PAYABLE, INCLUDING RELATED PARTY

Convertible notes payable at June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 consist of the following:

During the six months ended June 30, 2017, the Company issued convertible notes in the aggregate principal amount of $295,750, with original issue discounts of $19,250. Due to the variable conversion price associated with these convertible notes, the Company has determined that the conversion feature is considered derivative liabilities. The embedded conversion feature was initially calculated to be $743,375, which is recorded as a derivative liability as of the date of issuance. The derivative liability was first recorded as a debt discount up to the face amount of the convertible notes of $295,750, with the remainder being charge as a financing cost during the period. The debt discount is being amortized over the terms of the convertible notes. The Company recognized interest expense of $223,370 during the six months ended June 30, 2017 related to the amortization of the debt discount.

A rollfoward of the convertible notes payable from December 31, 2016 to June 30, 2017 is below:

NOTE 4 – SHORT TERM NOTE

On March 17, 2015, the Company entered into a promissory note with Peter Lambert for a loan of $25,000 that became due on June 15, 2015. The loan carries an interest at the rate of $55 per day. On June 12, 2015, the parties amended this promissory note so that the loan was extended and will accrue interest at $55 per day until this note is paid in full. As of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, there was $46,139 and $36,184 interest accrued on the loan respectively.

NOTE 5 – DERIVATIVE LIABILITY

The convertible notes discussed in Note 3 have a conversion price that is variable based on a percentage of the Company’s stock price which results in this embedded conversion feature being recorded as a derivative liability.

The fair value of the derivative liability is recorded and shown separately under current liabilities. Changes in the fair value of the derivative liability is recorded in the statement of operations under other income (expense).

The Company uses a weighted average Black-Scholes-Merton option-pricing model with the following assumptions to measure the fair value of derivative liability at June 30, 2017:

The following table represents the Company’s derivative liability activity for the period ended June 30, 2017:

NOTE 6 – RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

At June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the Company’s CEO (former CEO at June 30, 2017), Mr. Fleming, has a balance of $49,024 and $40,320, respectively, owed to him under “due to officers” for the transfer of assets, consulting fees and various out of pocket expenses.

On February 5, 2016, the Company issued 1,184 restricted shares of common stock in connection with the September 3, 2015 acquisition agreement to Team AJ, LLC.

As various times between August 5, 2015 and December 31, 2016, Mr. Acunto loaned the Company a total of $64,589 (which is set forth in convertible note payable). These notes bear interest at the rate of 4% per annum; $2,510 in interest has been accrued on these notes as of December 31, 2016. During the year ended December 31, 2016, $4,990 of these loans were repaid. The principal amount outstanding at June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 was $59,559.

On August 9, 2016, the Company issued 100,000,000 restricted shares of common stock to Mr. Fleming, the Company’s President, for services rendered and to be rendered to the Company.

On May 25, 2017, the Company issued 30,000,000 restricted shares of common stock to the Company’s new CEO, Mr. Gregory Martin, for services rendered and to be rendered to the Company.

Starting January 1, 2017 through May 31, 2017, Mr. Fleming is accruing a consulting fee of $10,000 a month under a written agreement with the Company.

During the year ended December 31, 2016, the holder of 6,500,000 stock options exercised those options and the Company recorded a receivable in the amount of $975,000. The remaining balance of $848,760 is recorded as a stock subscription receivable and is presented in the accompanying financial statements as a contra-equity account. During the six months ended June 30, 2017, the Company determined that the remaining balance of $848,670 was not collectible and wrote off the entire balance to additional paid in capital as this is deemed to be a capital transaction.

NOTE 7 – GOING CONCERN

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. The Company’s liabilities significantly exceed its assets, certain notes payable are in default and the Company has generated minimal revenue. This raises substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern. Without realization of additional capital, it would be unlikely for the Company to continue as a going concern. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from this uncertainty.

The Company’s activities to date have been supported by debt and equity financing. It has sustained losses in all previous reporting periods with an accumulated deficit of $137,305,401 as of June 30, 2017. Management continues to seek funding from its shareholders and other qualified investors to pursue its business plan. In the alternative, the Company may be amenable to a sale, merger or other acquisition in the event such transaction is deemed by management to be in the best interests of the shareholders.

NOTE 8 – COMMON STOCK

Anne Morrison was granted an option from the Company on August 8, 2016 under the Company’s 2016 Stock and Option Plan in payment for consulting services rendered by her to the Company. The Company’s board of directors approved this compensation (by unanimous written consent) on August 8, 2016. This option was exercised at $0.15 per share. The Company received $126,240 over a period of eight months as result of the exercise of this option. During the six months ended June 30, 2017, the Company determined that the remaining balance of $848,670 was not collectible and wrote off the entire balance to additional paid in capital as this is deemed to be a capital transaction.

On April 27, 2015, the Company completed a 3,000 to 1 reverse split of its issued and outstanding shares of common stock and on August 8, 2016 completed a 19,000 to 1 reverse split of its issued and outstanding shares of common stock. All shares and per share information in the accompanying financial statements has been retroactively restated to reflect these two reverse stock splits.

During the six months ended June 30, 2017, the Company issued shares of its common stock as follows:

 NOTE 9 – SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

Subsequent to June 30, 2017, the Company has issued 491,347,199 shares of common stock for the conversion of debt.

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.

The following management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations is based upon, and should be read in conjunction with, our unaudited financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this Form 10-Q, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.

Forward Looking Statements

Information in this Form 10-Q contains “forward looking statements” within the meaning of Rule 175 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Rule 3b-6 of the Securities Act of 1934, as amended. When used in this Form 10-Q, the words “expects,” “anticipates,” “believes,” “plans,” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. These are statements that relate to future periods and include, but are not limited to, statements regarding the adequacy of cash, expectations regarding net losses and cash flow, statements regarding growth, the need for future financing, dependence on personnel, and operating expenses.

Forward-looking statements are subject to certain risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those projected. These risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, those discussed below. These forward-looking statements speak only as of the date hereof. The Company expressly disclaims any obligation or undertaking to release publicly any updates or revisions to any forward-looking statements contained herein to reflect any change in expectations with regard thereto or any change in events, conditions or circumstances on which any such statement is based.

Overview

The Company continues development of its online movie channel, a 24 hour a day streaming internet TV station, and the further development of its online news and video news bureau in association with Leading Edge Radio Network and Mancuso Martin Productions.

Discussions with the Company and Mancuso Martin Productions on a comedy screenplay in development are on schedule as previously reported and the potential acquisition of seven additional screenplays as previously disclosed remains viable and ongoing. The Company continues to develop revenue share agreements and strategic partnership opportunities with radio, TV, movie and entertainment companies.

The Company has an interest in a weekly internet television show, “The Car Flip Guys” which focuses on how two young guys started and developed their own company with assistance from the Company. Additionally, The Car Flip Guys restoration of a 1971 Ford Mustang is on time and expected to preview the automobile for sale at auction or privately and we believes it will report income in the upcoming quarter from the sale of the vehicle.

Discussions continue regarding a golf ball and equipment company which is scheduled to debut in 2018. The golf company plans to feature two professional lines of golf balls for amateurs and professionals, golf gloves, golf clubs, golf shoes, apparel and accessories. Although the Company will not establish a brick and mortar operation, it believes that U.S. and worldwide golf courses, off course pro-shops and various retailers would be interested in picking up the brand, due in part to the science of the golf balls, performance, golf shafts and other components. Additionally, the Company believes that certain designers who the Company expects to be involved with the Company and the Company’s unique marketing plan will set the Company apart from its competitors. The Company’s current CEO is also an experienced former professional golfer with numerous contacts from the various tours including the PGA, Web.com, Champions Tour, and LPGA Tours, respectively.

The Company believes that attracting additional capital is likely to create desired results.

Results of Operations

The Company had revenue of $2,080 for the three months ended June 30, 2017 compared to $12,442 for the three months ended June 30, 2016. The Company had revenue of $2,097 for the six months ended June 30, 2017 compared to $32,648 for the six months ended June 30, 2016. These decreases were due to the refocusing of the Company towards Cloud Television, television production and movie production.

The Company had general and administrative expenses of $265,949 for the three months ended June 30, 2017 compared to $148,850 for the three months ended June 30, 2016, an increase of $117,099 or approximately 79%. The Company had general and administrative expenses of $2,259,126 for the six months ended June 30, 2017 compared to $5,682,125 for the six months ended June 30, 2016, a decrease of $3,422,999 or approximately 60%. This principal reasons for the decrease during the six months ended June 30, 2017 was due to the lower consulting fees in 2017 compared to 2016. The Company normally pays its consultants in shares of Company common stock. The increase during the three months ended June 30, 2017 was due to common stock issued to an officer of the Company valued at $150,000 in May 2017. There were no such issuances during the three months ended June 30, 2016.

The Company had interest and financing costs of $181,835 for the three months ended June 30, 2017 compared to $104,341 for the three months ended June 30, 2016, an increase of $77,494 or approximately 74%. The Company had interest and financing costs of $749,121 for the six months ended June 30, 2017 compared to $245,637 for the six months ended June 30, 2016, an increase of $503,484 or approximately 205%. These increases were due to the financing costs of $706,939 associated with the new convertible debentures entered into in 2017.

The Company had a net loss of $505,101 for the three months ended June 30, 2017 compared to $200,774 for the three months ended June 30, 2016, an increase of $304,327 or approximately 152%. The Company had a net loss of $1,623,600 for the six months ended June 30, 2017 compared to $8,077,748 for the six months ended June 30, 2016, a decrease of $6,454,148 or approximately 80%. These increases/decreases were due to factors described above.

Operating Activities

The net cash used in operating activities was $274,781 for the six months ended June 30, 2017 compared to $93,386 for the six months ended June 30, 2016, an increase of $181,395 or approximately 194%. This increase is attributed to many changes from period to period in our current assets and liabilities.

Financing Activities

Net cash provided by financing activities was $276,500 for the three months ended June 30, 2017 compared to $92,377 for the six months ended June 30, 2016, an increase of $184,123 or approximately 199%. This increase resulted primarily from obtaining new convertible notes during the period.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

As of June 30, 2017, the Company had total current assets of $34,216 and total current liabilities of $1,407,097, resulting in a working capital deficit of $1,372,881. The cash and cash equivalents were $3,216 as of June 30, 2017.

Whereas the Company has been successful in the past in raising capital, no assurance can be given that these sources of financing will continue to be available to it and/or that demand for equity/debt instruments will be sufficient to meet its capital needs, or that financing will be available on terms favorable to the Company. The financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.

If funding is insufficient at any time in the future, the Company may not be able to take advantage of business opportunities or respond to competitive pressures, or may be required to reduce the scope of planned product development and marketing efforts, any of which could have a negative impact on business and operating results. In addition, insufficient funding may have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition, which could require it to:

To the extent that the Company raises additional capital through the sale of equity or convertible debt securities, the issuance of such securities may result in dilution to existing stockholders. If additional funds are raised through the issuance of debt securities, these securities may have rights, preferences and privileges senior to holders of common stock and the terms of such debt could impose restrictions on the Company’s operations. Regardless of whether cash assets prove to be inadequate to meet the Company’s operational needs, the Company may seek to compensate providers of services by issuance of stock in lieu of cash, which may also result in dilution to existing stockholders.

Inflation

The impact of inflation on costs and the ability to pass on cost increases to the Company’s customers over time is dependent upon market conditions. The Company is not aware of any inflationary pressures that have had any significant impact on operations over the past quarter, and the Company does not anticipate that inflationary factors will have a significant impact on future operations.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

The Company does not maintain off-balance sheet arrangements nor does it participate in non-exchange traded contracts requiring fair value accounting treatment.

Critical Accounting Policies

The SEC has issued Financial Reporting Release No. 60, “Cautionary Advice Regarding Disclosure About Critical Accounting Policies” (“FRR 60”), suggesting companies provide additional disclosure and commentary on their most critical accounting policies. In FRR 60, the Commission has defined the most critical accounting policies as the ones that are most important to the portrayal of a company’s financial condition and operating results, and require management to make its most difficult and subjective judgments, often as a result of the need to make estimates of matters that are inherently uncertain. Based on this definition, the Company’s most critical accounting policies include: (a) use of estimates; (b) impairment of long-lived assets; and (c) derivative financial instruments. The methods, estimates and judgments the Company uses in applying these most critical accounting policies have a significant impact on the results the Company reports in its financial statements.

The preparation of financial statements requires the Company to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. On an on-going basis, the Company evaluates these estimates, including those related to revenue recognition and concentration of credit risk. The Company bases its estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that is believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

In accordance with Accounting Standards Codification Topic 360, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets,” long-lived assets such as property and equipment and intangible assets subject to amortization, are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset group may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets groups to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset group to estimated undiscounted future cash flows expected to be generated by the asset group. If the carrying amount of an asset group exceeds its estimated future cash flows, an impairment charge is recognized by the amount by which the carrying amount of an asset group exceeds fair value of the asset group. At December 31, 2015, the Company evaluated its long-lived assets and determined that they had been impaired and took a charge to earnings of $4,478,142. At December 31, 2016, the Company evaluated its long-lived assets and determined that no impairment was necessary.

The Company evaluates all of its agreements to determine if such instruments have derivatives or contain features that qualify as embedded derivatives. For derivative financial instruments that are accounted for as liabilities, the derivative instrument is initially recorded at its fair value and is then re-valued at each reporting date, with changes in the fair value reported in the consolidated statements of operations. For stock-based derivative financial instruments, the Company uses a weighted average Black-Scholes-Merton option-pricing model to value the derivative instruments at inception and on subsequent valuation dates. The classification of derivative instruments, including whether such instruments should be recorded as liabilities or as equity, is evaluated at the end of each reporting period. Derivative instrument liabilities are classified in the balance sheet as current or non-current based on whether or not net-cash settlement of the derivative instrument could be required within 12 months of the balance sheet date. The Company’s only derivative financial instrument were embedded conversion feature associated with convertible debentures due to certain provisions that allow for a change in the conversion price and a warrant that to contains certain provisions that allow for a change in the exercise price if securities are issued at a price per share below the exercise price.

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Not applicable.

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

The Company maintains disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) and Rule 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in its periodic reports filed under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to management, including the principal executive officer/principal financial officer, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

As of the end of the period covered by this report, the Company’s management carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of the principal executive officer/principal financial officer, of disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) and Rule 15d-15(e) of the Exchange Act). Based upon the evaluation, the principal executive officer/principal financial officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were not effective at a reasonable assurance level to ensure that information required to be disclosed by it in the reports that the Company files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. In addition, the principal executive officer/principal financial officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were not effective at a reasonable assurance level to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports that the Company files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including the principal executive officer/principal financial officer, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Inherent Limitations of Control Systems

Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, will be or have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, and/or by management override of the control. The design of any system of controls also is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions; over time, controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, and/or the degree of compliance with the policies and procedures may deteriorate. Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective internal control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

There have not been any changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the three months ended June 30, 2017 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

PART II – OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS.

On June 1, 2017, the Company entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement with Power Up Lending Group Ltd, a Virginia corporation (the “Lender”), pursuant to which the Company issued to the Lender a Convertible Promissory Note in the principal amount of $23,000 (the “Note”). The Note accrued interest at 12% per annum and matures on March 15, 2018. The Lender has the right at any time from 180 days of entering into the Note to convert part of the outstanding and unpaid principal amount of the Note into shares of Common Stock (with certain restrictions) The conversion price is 58% multiplied by the market price and “market price” means the average of the lowest three trading prices (as reported on the OTC Markets) for Common Stock during the ten trading day period ending on the latest complete trading day prior to conversion.

The sale of these securities was made pursuant to Rule 506(b) of Regulation D promulgated by the SEC under the Securities Act. The Lender was an “accredited investor” as defined in Rule 501(a) of Regulation D. The Lender acknowledged appropriate investment representations with respect to the issuances of the Note and consented to the imposition of restrictive legends upon the certificates representing the conversion shares. The Lender had a significant preexisting relationship to the Company prior to the transaction and the Note was not issued as a result of any general solicitation. The Lender was afforded the opportunity to ask questions of the Company’s management and to receive answers concerning the terms and conditions of the investments. No selling commissions or other remuneration were paid in connection with the sale of these securities.

ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION.

The disclosure contained in Item 2 of Part II herein is incorporated by reference herein.

On August 1, 2017, the sole director appointed Jason Alpers, Joshua Merritt, and Ean Martin to serve as directors of the Company. There are no arrangements or understandings between the new directors and any other persons, pursuant to which each director was selected as a director of the Company. None of the directors who were appointed were appointed to any committees of the board of directors and, at the present time, there are no plans to appoint any of the new directors to any committee.

Ean Martin is the son of Gregory Martin, the Company’s Chairman, CEO, and President. Ean Martin is the owner of The Car Flip Guys and the Company has entered into an Revenue Sharing Agreement with The Car Flip Guys for 50% of the gross revenues The Car Flip Guys derive from the TV Show, "The Car Flip Guys" with such revenue including the ultimate goal of selling each car they acquire, restore and sell at 50% of gross revenues as well shared with the Company.

On May 26, 2017, the Company entered into a Revenue Share Agreement with The Car Flip Guys for the purpose of filming a TV show entitled, "The Car Flip Guys." The Company will derive revenue under a 50% - 50% revenue share agreement between the companies in two distinct arenas, including potential revenue from TV viewership and the sale of classic automobiles upon their being restored. Ean Martin is the son of Gregory Martin, who is Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of InCapta, Inc.

On May 26, 2017, the Company entered into a Revenue Share Agreement with Banana Box Wholesale Grocery for the purpose of filming a TV show, "Secret Savings on Groceries." The Company will derive revenue under a 50% - 50% revenue share agreement between the companies in two distinct arenas, including potential revenue from TV viewership and the acquisition of new customers in the wholesale grocery business, nationwide. Gregory Martin is the CEO and Chairman of the Board of the Company, owns Banana Box Wholesale Grocery, and is majority owner of Mancuso Martin Productions.

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Company has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

20